TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FelineQuinine Archive

View 2 posts and 157 comments by FelineQuinine on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

There's a difference between "20 years experience" and one year of experience 20 times
/r/MensRights10/04/20 01:12 AM
2

Homicide.
/r/MensRights10/04/20 01:09 AM
2

I mean that women (seemingly proportionally more than men) often are more cautious of inappropriate objectification in terms of sexual harassment and manipulation Sounds like the pathological rape fantasy ubiquitous in feminist rape culture. So wouldn't it make sense that people should stand up for those issues? Not really. You don't help people with phobias by pretending their responses are reasonable.
/r/MensRights07/04/20 11:35 AM
2

I think people shouldn’t be having sex while drunk. I also think people shouldn’t get drunk. I fully support your ability for you, personally, to choose not to do those things. I likewise fully support the ability of other people to choose differently for themselves according to their own personal peferences. If both people are in that situation, it’s not rape. If one person is drunk and the other isn’t, it’s rape. So, by your standards, if you get drunk and then drag a sober person into the bus…
/r/MensRights07/04/20 10:44 AM
8

my mother is physically disabled so I needed to help her shop While the gender bigotry angle probably won't have any legal traction, there's a pretty valid ADA complaint here if you're in the US.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 10:20 PM
7

Also I don’t believe that if two drunk people have enthusiastic sex, rape occurs. If one person is drunk and the other is sober, rape occurs. It doesn’t matter what gender the drunk person is. Drunk people can’t consent to sex. First: make up your mind. Second: advocating nonsense like this to a group full of people who have had drunk consensual sex is a quick way to destroy your credibility. Third: the difference between drunk consensual sex and drunk nonconsensual sex is consent. The feminist …
/r/MensRights06/04/20 08:09 AM
3

That's an interesting way of saying genital mutilation remains legal in every state.
/r/MensRights06/04/20 07:57 AM
17

Treasury interception is on behalf of the States. The "stimulus" will be redirected to the State, not your ex. It may (or may not) then be forwarded on to your ex. Point being: it is the State that is the enemy of parents and children. If you and your ex are on great terms and both have the best interests of the child at heart, that's great, you can fight the State together to protect the child and each other. If not... well, best interests of the State is probably gonna win.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 10:45 PM
4

Using data from the 2017 CDC NISVS State Report... In the prior 12 months... 1.473m women were "raped", 0.219m men were "raped", 1.715m men were "made-to-penetrated". (The 12 month prevalence for "made-to-penetrate" for women was, of course, zero.) That's 1.934m male victims and 1.473m female victims. 56.77% of rape victims are male.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 10:25 PM
2

No I don't believe feminism has done that. Your belief is incorrect. Having discovered you believed something incorrect, do you repair your belief systems to incorporate these new facts or do you insist that the politically and institutionally powerful forms of feminism are the lunatic fringe while you, unnoticed, espouse True Scottish Feminism?
/r/MensRights04/04/20 11:46 AM
1

Do you think that men are oppressed, whether systematically or otherwise? There are a number of problems that disproportionately affect men, yes. Who do you think “has it worse”: men, women, or do you think we both have it rough equally? If everyone is equally "oppressed", do we congratulate ourselves on a job well done, pack up and go home? In specific cases of how to apportion limited resources for maximum helpful effects, this might be a useful question. In Big Picture terms, it's irrelevant.…
/r/MensRights04/04/20 04:21 AM
3

An Analysis of Reasons for the Disparity in Wages Between Men and Women. This is the original 2009 report for the Dept. of Labor that kicked off "muh wage gap". Prime quotes: "the raw wage gap continues to be used in misleading ways to advance public policy agendas without fully explaining the reasons behind the gap" "it is not possible now, and doubtless will never be possible, to determine reliably whether any portion of the observed gender wage gap is not attributable to factors that compensa…
/r/MensRights03/04/20 05:56 PM
8

Note that the "stimulus" is being sent out, it's just being intercepted and redirected to the State. That is, parents who were struggling prior to this shit, who were forced to choose between keeping their kids fed or keeping current on child support, will not be able to use this money to feed their children. Guess those kids don't deserve to eat.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 05:38 PM
1

Petition to repeal Section 1 and Section 2 of the Sexual Offenses Act 2003, as parliament has repeatedly opined that Section 4(4) fully covers the described offenses and the redundancy of having Section 1 and Section 2 may be confusing to the public, police, and prosecutors.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 10:09 AM
1

I'm sure they (the States) did and followed the path that gets them (the States) the most money. That it's bad for children is probably just seen as a fringe benefit, the real focus is the best interests of the State.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 06:47 AM
1

Dead people aren't (supposed to be) getting the $1200 CoViD-19 payment, anyway, so State government won't be stealing food from children's mouths since the money wouldn't have been going out in any way where they might've otherwise benefitted from it. What point were you trying to make, dipshit?
/r/MensRights03/04/20 06:44 AM
1

understanding the reason people fall behind with payments The Incentive Payments to States are bigger if people fall behind with payments. No further understanding of individual circumstances is necessary, the system is designed to have zero checks and balances to protect noncustodial parents or their children and can be expected to be harmful to children's interests and to facilitate domestic abuse.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 04:51 AM
1

No parent should be forced to choose between keeping their kids fed and keeping current on child support, but it happens and I don't fault those parents in the least for prioritizing their children over their ex or the State.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 04:37 AM
1

I guess those children don't deserve to eat.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 04:23 AM
1

Which may be a fantastic way to get compensated for employer retaliation.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 02:18 AM
4

Do MRAs perceive transgender women as benefitting from such privilege? If a transwoman is generally percieved as a woman (i.e., is able to "pass") then, yes, I would expect her to be able to exploit female hypoagency, gynocentrism, etc. Are there any thoughts on why most sex changes are Male-to-Female, not Female-to-Male? Women have many more options for gender expression. E.g. a woman who prefers to wear pants probably isn't going to get a lot of social friction that will make her feel that the…
/r/MensRights28/03/20 01:35 AM
5

Y'all have an anonymous reporting system, though you may need to use some of the other complaint/grievance resources mentioned further down the page if you don't think this has safety implications.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 12:46 AM
1

Seems like a bad idea. Because your employer has created and is creating a hostile workplace environment.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 12:35 AM
2

Given the large gender disparities in law enforcement and prosecution, there is a pretty valid case to be made that base rate criminality is similar regardless of gender. It may merely be that female criminals, and their victims, are less likely to see justice done. There is also the less hypothetical observation that criminal vs. victim has disproportionately male victims regardless of the criminal's gender. That is female criminals predominantly target male victims, too. So there would not app…
/r/MensRights28/03/20 12:29 AM
6

No parent should be forced to choose between feeding their children or paying child support. "Contempt of Court" is the appropriate response when the court is contemptible.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 11:36 PM
0

Have you considered registering a complaint with the relevant oversight agencies about your employer creating a hostile workplace environment?
/r/MensRights27/03/20 11:28 PM
1

Women can be sure they're taking care of their own kids on account of knowing whether a child has come out of their vagina. This doesn't change throughout history nor is it a "quite recent" "power play".
/r/MensRights27/03/20 10:51 PM
5

"although they may be the loudest in the room, doesn’t mean they accurately represent the movement"
/r/MensRights27/03/20 12:32 PM
1

Fidelity, monogamy, chastity, etc. are concepts that improve women's odds of being able to convince a man to support her and her children.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 12:13 PM
7

Obligatory GWW quote.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 12:06 PM
9

A male feminist is a dude who read what feminists have imagined about men in their most demented hate fantasies and said to himself "Oh, that is so me."
/r/MensRights27/03/20 12:04 PM
1

That's not how it's supposed to work, I'll give you that much.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 11:25 AM
1

is it your understanding that denying qualified immunity for a government employee, it shields the employing government institution from any liability? No. I'll assume the rest of your comment is error carried forward, then?
/r/MensRights27/03/20 11:23 AM
10

Unless the sexual predatrix, the girlfriend, and/or your friend are big fans of feminist rape culture and coherent thinking, any attempts to point out the double standard are likely to fall on deaf ears.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 08:34 AM
4

Next you'll be saying Cory in the House isn't anime.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 01:36 AM
7

Previously you had a deep pocket institution solely responsible. Now you have a deep pocket institution "and" an individual sharing responsibility. Probable compensation, all else being equal, has decreased.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 01:32 AM
19

This will most likely be used to shift responsibility from the schools to the individual administrators, thus reducing or eliminating the restorative compensation available to the victims.
/r/MensRights27/03/20 12:58 AM
1

Due to reasons I gave above I can not agree to your idea. None of your reasons above address the idea. Forcing someone into 9 months of pregnancy [....] Is not the idea. Many women, even if they identify as "pro-choice", also state that they personally cannot see themselves choosing abortion. Those women in scenario #3 (or #1, for that matter) should continue to have the option of LPS. And in #3 you get a win-win, same as #4,, since you have a consenting biological parent ready to take sole resp…
/r/MensRights27/03/20 12:25 AM
1

#3 should also have the option for the woman to not abort, but still exercise legal parental surrender, leaving the (willing and consenting) father as the sole parent.
/r/MensRights26/03/20 11:32 PM
1

A rich white man isn't going to raise the issues of a poor black man, or a woman in crisis, or a transgender man. I'm sorry to hear you're so incapable of empathy that you believe this to be the case for everyone.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 12:08 AM
1

there is an undeniable utility in having a degree of balance in representation of race, religion, sex, and gender when it comes to institutions of power [X] Doubt. Religion I could see, just because that's the only one people choose, and thus there is some reliability of religions being proxies for differing approaches or points of view.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 10:48 PM
1

I suspect she's probably trying to ease him into it.
/r/MensRights13/03/20 07:49 AM
8

POSITION: Men have problems. They deserve to be fixed. MensRights: "They" refers to the problems. MensLib: "They" refers to the men. Bonus MensLib: "Fixed" is the veterinary euphemism.
/r/MensRights12/03/20 11:53 PM
2

What else have you tried? What sort of results have you had with topical steroid ointment and gradual stretching?
/r/MensRights11/03/20 07:39 PM
7

Being the majority of human trafficking victims. But not the majority of human trafficking survivors.
/r/MensRights11/03/20 07:37 PM
2

How do I explain the problem with the "historical oppression" narrative to first graders? You could try translating some of the dynamics historically trotted out as proof of oppressive patriarchy into parent-child relations and ask if they'd agree they're oppressing their parents. e.g., Do your parents make sure you have food, clothing, shelter, etc.? Are they oppressing you? Do they cook for you, clean up after you, etc.? Are you oppressing them? That brings me do Question Two: Is a first grade…
/r/MensRights11/03/20 07:23 PM
1

That article seems like it's on the edge of violating the FCC rules for clearly identifying "native advertising".
/r/MensRights11/03/20 04:33 PM
1

In the US, there are certain jobs for which it is illegal to participate in a general worker strike. It's generally things associated with "keeping the lights on", literally and figuratively. They are worked predominantly by men.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 03:39 PM
1

Oh, like that one journalist dude back in ye olde #GamerGate days.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 10:25 AM
26

Y'think these people just distributed the first piece of CP they found, or do you think they browsed a bit, telling themselves it was for a good cause...
/r/MensRights08/03/20 06:00 AM
3

What were you trying to link to? This?
/r/MensRights08/03/20 05:38 AM
2

You are more likely to be forced to use lethal force to defend yourself and stop a crime committed by someone known to you than be attacked by a complete stranger, though.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 05:34 AM
3

She wasn't "upfront about dealbreakers" because she knows that many people would agree that her dealbreaker is indeed a dealbreaker and immediately stop dating her. Including people for whom the dealbreaker would not have otherwise been an issue in the relationship.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 03:10 AM
1

Seems unrelated to the name/topic of the sub. So, basically, another example of reddit being incapable of fostering civil discourse in shared spaces and reacting by attacking various human and civil rights principles rather than fixing their shit.
/r/MensRights08/03/20 01:04 AM
2

So... GANG WEED BOTTOM TEXT memes?
/r/MensRights08/03/20 12:32 AM
5

Is it a fan sub for the dude from Despicable Me?
/r/MensRights08/03/20 12:17 AM
1

admit that Valerie Solanas - who wrote the Society for Cutting Up Men (SCUM) manifesto was "satirical" too. I think the ability to claim her writing about murdering men was merely satirical went out the window with the, y'know, attempting to murder men.
/r/MensRights07/03/20 01:46 AM
1

men have always dominated women since the dawn of time Men have always dominated men since the dawn of time. Men have always supported women since the dawn of time. [...]
/r/MensRights07/03/20 12:00 AM
1

Obligatory gww quote: So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching the courses, influencing the public policies, and the massive, well-funded feminist organizations with thousands and thousands of members all of whom call themselves feminists... they are not "real feminists". That's not just "no true Scotsman". That's delusional self d…
/r/MensRights06/03/20 07:37 AM
0

I find it delightful you're so engaged, but you still seem to be missing the forest for the trees.. Try it out with StatCan data for average usual weekly hours by gender and Hourly wages, full time workers (which is already reduced to a gender ratio, but is derived from the average usual weekly pay by gender). Spoiler: America's Hat StatCan data is 'coincidentally' also parity +/- 2%, just as with BLS data from Canada's Pants.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 04:39 AM
1

The CFOI methodology as described is not limited to "full-time and year-round". The replication in the other comment using 2019 data confirms the methodology. You dont think that bit is relevant to this discussion? Considering that's not relevant to the 77¢/$1 and that's been the focus of this discussion, no, that's not relevant to this discussion. Recap: >>>> There's 8.4mg of Vitamin C in apples according to google. >>> ACKSHUALLY, google says there's 51.1mg in oranges. >> [...] I'm not talking…
/r/MensRights06/03/20 03:55 AM
0

Ayy, now there's something to discuss. ...which CONSAD did pretty exhaustively 11 years ago.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 02:52 AM
0

You used 77 cents in your graphic. You should know where that number comes from. It comes from the hours worked. There is no addition outside source for the 77¢/$1. That the raw gender wage gap expected from the gender hours-worked gap and raw gender wage gap from additional outside sources are often similar is the point.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 02:00 AM
0

[An Analysis of Reasons for the Disparity in Wages Between Men and Women](https://www.shrm.org/hr-today/public-policy/hr-public-policy-issues/Documents/Gender Wage Gap Final Report.pdf) prepared by CONSAD for the Department of Labor in 2009 is the original primary source that kicked off Muh Wage Gap. Some choice quotes: "the raw wage gap continues to be used in misleading ways to advance public policy agendas without fully explaining the reasons behind the gap" "When the ratio is calculated for …
/r/MensRights06/03/20 01:16 AM
1

You're giving Muh Wage Gap woozle too much credit. The "raw wage gap" is simply a matter of how the dollars payed out by all employers to all employees is split between genders, e.g., for every 1.77x dollars paid to employees, 0.77x of those dollars go to female employees, 1.00x of those dollars go to male employees. And yes, a single first-pass adjustment for something as simple as how much life&labor men and women sell to employers is 100+% sufficient to account for Muh Wage Gap. The added 77¢…
/r/MensRights06/03/20 12:15 AM
4

The graphic is directly from the official BLS CFOI chart pack (w/ addition of the 77¢/$1 part). The chart packs have been discontinued/removed as of 2020, but you can still find the underlying data in spreadsheet form.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 11:27 PM
2

Judging by the stories told in AskReddit threads on this topic, a rather more common MO for rapists is to rely on (the threat of) false accusations to coerce compliance from the victim during the rape and to silence him afterwards.
/r/MensRights05/03/20 05:23 AM
9

Her only real counter-argument to his position is her statement about women being the ones who are mostly raped, which isn't even true if you take into account male-on-male rape in prison. It isn't even true if you take into account the most common type of female-on-male rape. Using data from the 2017 CDC NISVS State Report: 97.3% of 1.473m female victims of "Rape" have only male perpetrators. 86.5% of 0.219m male victims of "Rape" have only male perpetrators. 78.5% of 1.715m male victims of "Ma…
/r/MensRights05/03/20 04:23 AM
1

What are the ages of everyone?
/r/MensRights05/03/20 03:09 AM
1

How much discussion and mutual agreement was there about the first three?
/r/MensRights05/03/20 02:48 AM
2

For a long time the official CFOI chart pack had a slide that showed hours worked and number of injuries by gender in the form of two pie charts. Like so. (I've added the 77¢/$1, the rest is directly from BLS). They stopped doing that in 2019 (2018 data year) and I suppose I was trying to back-calculate it from the data that was released. This more recent comment has better sources for those exact numbers, and might have the data tables for the graph you're talking about.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 08:00 PM
1

Equal Occupational Fatality Day 2008 occurs on June 22nd this year.
/r/MensRights04/03/20 12:45 PM
2

A lot of the current-day "feminist" discussion will have terms and concepts that originated in Men's Rights show up. I have zero expectation of this being properly credited. Most likely, once MRA frsming has slowly and inexorably taken over the gender equality conversation, you'll have feminists saying "See, we told you Feminism helps men!"
/r/MensRights03/03/20 05:54 PM
1

What are some things I can say to combat that?? "OK Bigot."
/r/MensRights01/03/20 03:50 PM
1

That's a weird way of saying single mothers are fueling knife crime.
/r/MensRights29/02/20 01:16 PM
2

Always archive hate blogs rather than linking them, so they cannot profit off bigotry.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 06:52 PM
1

Sexually harassing someone because you hunger for a relationship and/or want them to love you doesn't make it not sexual harassment.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 06:36 PM
1

Link 1: "drawn from 94,146 filicide arrests tabulated over a 32-year period" > arrests e.g., Dad calls the police because mom's beating a child to death. Police arrive and promptly arrest dad i.a.w. their Duluth Model derived training. Link2: "Focusing on 1,612 children under age 18 that were killed by their parents between 1961 and 2011, regional and temporal trends in the gender of accused are examined" > accused See: Female Offenders in Canada, which closely mirrors the findings of Estimating…
/r/MensRights28/02/20 06:33 PM
1

None of what you described sounds particularly mean-spirited. Oh wow look at Betty Crocker over here, these actually taste decent This is a compliment. Wow miykael13, nothing better to do when you get home? This is a jealous compliment. did your girlfriend actually make these? This is a compliment. you didn’t buy these from a store did you? This is a compliment. It's weird, kinda shitty, sometimes backhanded, compliments, but that's how this shit works. At least that's my reading of it.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 03:26 PM
1

What else do you think it could be?
/r/MensRights28/02/20 06:08 AM
1

Were you subscribed to the subreddit? Pretty sure the default settings when a sub is switched to private gives the pre-existing userbase permissions to keep on keeping on. Speaking of "request it", though, seems like an intentionally abandoned/squatted subreddit namespace should be transferrable by the FAQ of /RedditRequest.
/r/MensRights28/02/20 02:56 AM
1

Use a better title.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 08:29 AM
1

You're probably thinking of Thomas James Ball. He was not a victim of this type of fraud and reproductive abuse, AFAIK, and his self-immolation on the steps of the Keene, NH, courthouse was a protest of he family court rackets that enable, and in some cases directly perpetrate, domestic violence and child abuse.
/r/MensRights27/02/20 03:00 AM
1

Well yeah, but these are only points a non-Catholic could make! There are translations of Ex21:22-25 in English that predate the Protestants by several centuries. Catholic dogma is that a soul comes into existence at the moment the egg is fertilised, I believe. Furthermore (as you know) Catholic dogma holds that abortion at any stage is ethically the same as murder. And who are mere Catholics to contradict the Word of God? (By which I may mean both the Bible and the Creation that the Lord, your …
/r/MensRights26/02/20 08:42 AM
1

Surely this is a bit of an extreme case scenario though? You can find people selling positive pregnancy tests (and/or pregnant women's urine) in pretty much any/every military town in my experience. Go check Australian craigslist (gumtree? kijiji?) and you can probably find a few ads you can report right now (assuming they've been banned). There are also "prank" pregnancy tests that are always positive. Or various things you can add to your own urine to get a (false) positive result. how is she …
/r/MensRights26/02/20 08:08 AM
1

The majority of fertilized embryos don't implant, anyway, so seems a bit daft for an omnipotent being to make a fuss about the percentage being tweaked a few points. Particularly since ol' universal superbeing could just make your BC fail if it was important. Or, y'know, specify that the consequences for beating a pregnant woman, resulting in an induced miscarriage, being more than a fine of however-many shekels.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 07:27 AM
1

The red flag here is if she says you aren't allowed in to hear what the doctor tells her. Under HIPAA, pregnancy status is Protected Health Information and, technically, you aren't allowed to hear what the doctor tells her, unless the Covered Entity (i.e., the doctor, in this example) has been specifically and explicitly instructed to disclose the information to a third party. HHS slapped a few organizations with PHI violations (and rather large fines) related to nonpatients being in the room (w…
/r/MensRights26/02/20 01:27 AM
1

Contraceptively, women have gone to extraordinary lengths in order to give men a condom free experience. Sorry. No. Women are obsessed with filthy creampie sex.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 01:02 AM
2

Why would male birth control be so much more complicated? I mean it couldn't be much more complicated than female birth control. The pill: puts your body into fake early pregnancy state. You don't ovulate because your body thinks you're already pregnant. Oh, just have to convince men's bodies they're pregnant. Why had no one though of this before! Cyclic hormonal birth control may also function by changing the surface activity of endometrial tissue so successful implantation of an embryo is impo…
/r/MensRights26/02/20 12:39 AM
1

Note: in the UK, a rapist penetrating her vagina with the victim's penis without his consent is not legally recognized as the crime of "Rape", so please do not refer to rapists who rape children in the UK as "Rapists". The correct legal term for women who rape children in the UK is Causing-sexual-activity-without-consent-ist. Or "csawcist", for short, perhaps.
/r/MensRights26/02/20 12:14 AM
1

There are literally browser plugins that can do this for you.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 08:07 AM
1

Pretty much any article about a schoolmarm raping a boy will have people in the comments sharing their child rape fantasies.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 01:22 AM
2

"a society or environment whose prevailing social attitudes have the effect of normalizing or trivializing sexual assault and abuse"
/r/MensRights23/02/20 12:45 AM
2

Only in reference to women raping children, perhaps.
/r/MensRights23/02/20 12:38 AM
1

Using data from the 2017 CDC NISVS State Report: 97.3% of 1.473m female victims of "Rape" have only male perpetrators. 86.5% of 0.219m male victims of "Rape" have only male perpetrators. 78.5% of 1.715m male victims of "Made-to-Penetrate" have only female perpetrators. (The 12-month estimate for number of female victims of "Made-to-Penetrate" is zero.) From this we can see that 50.3% of rape victims fall into "Made-to-Penetrate" and are thus excluded from the CDC's NISVS discussion of "Rape". Fr…
/r/MensRights23/02/20 12:32 AM
1

Where's your school? Who produced it? Can you link us to an online version? If not, have you read it and can you review the contents?
/r/MensRights20/02/20 05:22 AM
1

The FBI recently changed their definition of 'rape' to include men 'made to penetrate' Source?
/r/MensRights20/02/20 03:31 AM
1

for some reason "domestic violence" is cited as a cause of death in only 131 cases. Up until 2019 the category/code that's now used for "Domestic Violence" was named "Lover's Quarrel". A lot of things that might have been recorded under LQ/DV circumstances instead ended up in "Argument", "Other Felony Involved", "Other Circumstances", and "Unknown Circumstances". Weirder still, according to this table the greatest proportion of "domestic violence" victims had just a non-family relationship ("acq…
/r/MensRights19/02/20 01:54 PM
1

Which don't really affect men, because men don't have abortion rights. +1 to W count stands
/r/MensRights19/02/20 09:32 AM
1

The abortion laws only really affect women. Abortion Rights. W1:M0. And any rights in Family Court are usually given to women. Parental Rights. W2:M0. Really more interested in hearing the supposed rights men have that women don't.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 09:14 AM
1

There's a slide from a machine learning and artificial intelligence conference that basically asserts that if your algorithm has demographic disparities in its output that can only be because you've coded your bigotry into the algorithm and/or the input data... it can never be attributed to demographic subpopulations being different.
/r/MensRights19/02/20 04:54 AM
1

Various official Acts passed by the European Union government seem to be totally in thrall to feminist hate ideology, though. They may not be especially well recieved by the general public of the various EU member states, but it doesn't seem like the grumblings are loud enough to prevent the bigotry from being made institutional.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 04:41 AM
1

Familiarize yourself with 42USC658a, it's various code interactions, and the systemic outcomes it will produce. If you're feelin' moxy, reference it against RICO.
/r/MensRights18/02/20 03:49 AM
2

That one /girlwriteswhat quote seems relevant: So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching the courses, influencing the public policies, and the massive, well-funded feminist organizations with thousands and thousands of members all of whom call themselves feminists... they are not "real feminists". That's not just "no true Scotsman".…
/r/MensRights16/02/20 11:05 PM
1

Ah, the "women's choices and actions shouldn't matter" brand of equality.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 05:55 AM
1

what makes you less manly? Giving a shit what other people think. what makes you a man? Me.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 05:04 AM
1

Contact the local code enforcement office and ask if a public business not having a men's restroom violates health&safety regulations and/or building codes.
/r/MensRights13/02/20 02:25 AM
1

How is support for the (semitic, btw) people of Palestine anti-semitism?
/r/MensRights13/02/20 12:48 AM
1

When it comes to matters outside of the law, I have to disagree and stand by my point ["it's a man's word"]. I can't fault you for not seeing that the world is patriarchal; you're a man, after all. As a woman who has been treated as a second class citizen by virtue of my sex, I can assure you of that unfortunate fact. Lotta times, in my experience, when a woman has complained about being treated like a "second class citizen", what's happened to her is that she was treated to the tiniest bit of e…
/r/MensRights12/02/20 09:12 AM
1

Imagine working less, retiring sooner, and living longer... and the response being that, gosh, it's so tragic, here, have some more of other people's money.
/r/MensRights12/02/20 08:29 AM
1

"You go first."
/r/MensRights12/02/20 01:47 AM
1

Men: Majority of rape victims. Majority of violent crime victims. Majority of suicides. Majority of fatal occupational injuries. Conditional right to vote. Lower life expectancy. Higher retirement age. Lower pay relative to hours worked. Genital mutilation remains legal globally. Net taxpayers. Large gender disparities in criminal justice. Large gender disparities in family courts. Large gender disparities in educational attainment. Exclusion from various institutional assistance programs on the…
/r/MensRights12/02/20 01:36 AM
1

/u/SslimReaperr 107 points 8 hours ago some men out there truly genuinely believe being falsely accused is WORSE than being raped. Considering men are the only ones out there likely to have experienced both, you should probably take a seat and listen rather than speak about something for which you have no experience. It is also often the case that rapists will rely on (threat of) false accusations to coerce compliance from the victim during the rape and keep them silent afterwards. So, for many …
/r/MensRights12/02/20 01:22 AM
1

Listen, dude. It's pretty straightforward. If you keep saying pro-Nazi things, people are going to "claim" you're pro-Nazi. Simple as. No idea why defenders of the socialismilieu have such trouble with this concept.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 09:30 PM
1

Okay, but that still is a lot of effort to spend on something that is essentially meaningless. Its purpose is to highlight the usage of "manosphere" with the same intent. Oh and Nazis were right wing and Fascist, they were Socialist in name only and hostile to Socialism. So you're right, they are unrelated. Again, I know you're upset to have the grandeur of the vision of your homeboy Hitler sullied by association with other members of the socialismilieu, but most people give about s much shit ab…
/r/MensRights10/02/20 01:05 PM
1

I know what you are getting at I don't think you do. The Nazis, were not part of some "socialismilieu". Considering 'socialismilieu' exists as an anti-word intended to conflate unrelated things and reduce understanding and that you've responded to angrily defend Nazis from being tarred by association with other movements in the socialismilieu, yes, National Socialism is definitely part of the socialismilieu.
/r/MensRights10/02/20 09:50 AM
4

Did you establish consensus for your edit on the Talk page for the article prior to editing?
/r/MensRights10/02/20 08:47 AM
1

> ACKSHUALLY Nobody gives a shit about how the antisemites in the socialismilieu pretend to be different from each other. Also, /s Also, whoosh.gif
/r/MensRights10/02/20 08:12 AM
2

WSJ endorsing the worst mutations of 'Red Pill Theory' just because it's been gender swapped. Honk. Honk.
/r/MensRights08/02/20 06:27 PM
2

From Nazi Death Camps to Soviet Pogroms, a data driven sketch of the socialismilieu.
/r/MensRights08/02/20 06:21 PM
10

Hey now. Several of the 165k members of \/r\/feminism might have tried to address the facts. They just had their posts censored by the mods.
/r/MensRights07/02/20 12:11 AM
1

Hello! Welcome to your first day on the internet! Don't believe everything you read.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 04:55 PM
1

Not seeing that he "held it against her constantly". If you keep demanding someone trust you and they keep telling you the reasons they don't trust you... that's you bringing it up constantly, not them.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 03:14 PM
1

This is probably the first 30 days. I.e., at the end of the 30 days, he'll be offered a chance to produce the $1M. If he doesn't, he goes back for another 30 days. Repeat indefinitely.
/r/MensRights06/02/20 03:07 PM
1

I dont think cops would sanction me visiting a man I'd had arrested and put in the lock-up for purposes of sexual penetration. The examples are examples of the threat of violence rapists pose to coerce the rape victim into compliance during the attack and/or silence after the fact. I agree prevention would be better but DV has not been at all satisfactorily prevented so far. Both men and women are getting badly injured and killed every year in the thousands. However women are mainly the casualti…
/r/MensRights03/02/20 12:49 PM
1

Unless I had a gun I can't imagine how I could force a man to unwillingly put his penis in my vagina by means of "violence" (if you will pardon my frankness). You could place a phone call and men in policeman costumes (often with guns, incidentally) will come to lock your victim in a cage. If you and your victim are both in University, you could use a helpful, online, anonymous reporting tool to falsely accuse him of rape and have him expelled and forcibly removed and barred from campus. You can…
/r/MensRights03/02/20 08:22 AM
1

In Nova Scotia, no less. "I can barely feed myself." Yeah, no shit, really?
/r/MensRights03/02/20 07:28 AM
1

I am not your lawyer and this is not legal advice. You should consult with an attorney qualified to practice law in your jurisdiction who is familiar with the relevant code and courts for your area. Nova Scotia Provincial Child Support Guidelines Canadian Federal Child Support Guidelines - Look-up Table Will child support go down now that I have another mouth to feed? I can barely feed myself. Child support amounts are generally determined by taking the nonresidential parent's income and using a…
/r/MensRights03/02/20 07:15 AM
1

could he not push the woman off him? And risk injuring her? Giving her physical evidence to prove her false accusation he raped her? how would she manage to get his penis inside her vagina unless he consented? Violence and/or threat of violence to coerce compliance. That said I think this issue - can a woman rape a man- is a good issue to illustrate the potential dubiousness of claims of neat gender "symmetry" when it comes to discussing the question of how female violence against men lines up a…
/r/MensRights03/02/20 12:54 AM
1

Physical arousal, ejaculation, and orgasm are mediated by a spinal bounce reflex. Men who have spinal cord injuries that have separated their genitals from the rest of the nervous system, but leave the reflex undamaged, are able to get erections, ejaculate, etc. without involvement from the parts of the nervous system where consciousness manifests. Women have equivalent purely anatomical responses to genital stimulation. "The review examines whether unsolicited or non-consensual sexual stimulati…
/r/MensRights02/02/20 03:25 AM
1

MRAs refuse to acknowledge the vast majority of people mocking male sexual assault are males. I suspect the vast majority of males who mock male sexual assault victims are probably sexual assault victims. Minimizing their own sexual assault experiences, retconning them into wanted/consensual encounters, telling other victims the lies they tell themselves, are some of the only effective ways victims have of dealing with their experiences of sexual assault. A specific way you approach repairing th…
/r/MensRights02/02/20 02:02 AM
1

The specifics of the policy appear to absolutely allow non-diverse companies, just not non-diverse companies that are white and male. A non-diverse company that was exclusively white and female or exclusively a single non-white race and male would apparently be fine under the described policy.
/r/MensRights25/01/20 09:15 AM
1

Yes, people do this. It's a dysfunctional coping strategy. If you can recreate the experience under circumstances where you know it's consensual, maybe it could've been consensual that first time, too, and thus you're not a victim of rape. Right? Not a real one, at least. Please?
/r/MensRights25/01/20 03:34 AM
1

77.4% of homicide victims being male doesn't address the claim being made, so, yeah, sure, you're providing TRUEFACTS, but they are only tangentially related to the topic of the thread. You'd need to take something like the FBI expanded homicide data for sex of perpetrator and victim to work out what gender combinations are over or under represented and by how much. Disproportion based solely on the data itself: MPMV is 0.9944, MPFV is 1.0575, FPMV is 1.0242, and FPFV is 0.8866. Disproportion re…
/r/MensRights25/01/20 01:04 AM
1

"Prof. Starr emphasized that it is not possible to "prove" gender discrimination with data like hers... that disparate treatment may be one of the causes of this gap." ...and if you remove the disparate treatment, whether the cause is gender discrimination or benevolent sexism, you, kind of refeshingly, end up at a baserate criminality for each gender that's near parity. There is less accountability placed on women, when women are not seen as equals to their male counterparts. Gender malagency i…
/r/MensRights21/01/20 02:56 AM
0

Ugh, I tried not to, but this steaming pile is right there in my inbox every time I check. Women are still paid less and less likely to be promoted for similar work performance (or better) than male peers. While it is true that only 44-45% of the money paid by employers goes to women (i.e., if employers pay out $1.77x, $1x goes to men and $0.77x goes to women), something as simple as a first-pass adjustment for number of hours worked is sufficient to (more than) erase the apparent "gender wage g…
/r/MensRights20/01/20 07:19 AM
1

Feminism is about equal rights of sexes/genders. Discussions here tend to focus more on institutionally powerful and politically relevant manifestations of feminist hate ideology rather than "equality, tho" True Scottish Feminism. I'm sure the rest of your comment is very interesting, but would probably be more relevant to /MensLib, /TheRedPill, or other feminist hatesub.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 04:59 AM
1

Your reply would make more sense in the thread about the justifiability of "having a go at an unarmed person with a WEAPON". A self-defense reaction that, in hindsight, is factually disproportionate may nonetheless be reasonably justified because as the attack is occurring the defender does not have the benefit of hindsight. Reasonable people forced to defend themselve simply want the attack to stop as quickly as possible. It is not reasonable to expect, much less obligate, the victim to conside…
/r/MensRights20/01/20 04:24 AM
6

Given the people the Women's March has selected for keynotes and other endorsed positions, it would be reasonable to expect the majority of attendees to be either ignorant of the issues or in gleeful malicious agreement with the hate ideology it represents.
/r/MensRights19/01/20 06:13 AM
1

Trying to shift focus on who to blame rather than understanding the root causes is counterproductive and dysfunctional. Relatedly: "Victim blaming" is something victims do to themselves. It refers to the endless cycle of WhatIf-ing about shit that has no reasonable connection to the negative event or that are matters of random contingency rather than deliberate agency. Taking responsibility for your choices and actions is not victim blaming. Other people holding you accountable for your choices …
/r/MensRights19/01/20 05:04 AM
1

We all want to be treated equally. People prefer to have the nicest home in a shitty neighborhood rather than an objectively nicer home that is below-average in it's nicer neighborhoods. Nah, humans want to be treated better than their peers. Equality is the consolation prize. People are willing to settle for it, but it's not what they want (unless the alternative is even worse, personally, than equality). It's kind of interesting to note that a high degree of specialization and social balkaniza…
/r/MensRights19/01/20 01:46 AM
1

So... The Future is Female: The Book. Let's just say that feminist have not welcomed the book very positively and did not encourage a fellow female writter very much... Well, yeah! Can't have someone spilling the beans and laying out the plan for the genocide of 45% of humanity in pop-novel form.
/r/MensRights18/01/20 10:07 AM
1

the same way as you shove or kick a piece furniture that's annoying. I, and I believe non-abusive people in general, do not shove or kick furniture that's annoying. Actually, "furniture that's annoying" is kind of a weird concept. I'm pointing this out because when you've been in abusive relationships for a long time, you can start to perceive abusive thought-proceses and behaviors as a normal and expected part of interacting with people. You may not understand why people seem to suddenly stop w…
/r/MensRights18/01/20 04:08 AM
1

Suppose you hear the sounds of someone breaking into your home. Maybe they're there to nick your easily portable valuables and skedaddle; maybe they're there to murderape everyone in the house. You are not obligated to give the person invading your home the benefit of the doubt prior to exercising your human right to protect yourself (and/or your loved ones). It may subsequently be discovered they were unarmed. Hell, it may turn out that it was all a completely harmless misunderstanding that end…
/r/MensRights18/01/20 03:24 AM
1

🍪
/r/MensRights17/01/20 10:00 AM
1

Can you link to the repost?
/r/MensRights17/01/20 09:56 AM
1

Succinctly: To maintain a difference between your internal and external emotional state. The original prototype example, vis-a-vis paid work, is greeting customers with a smile and cheerful disposition regardless of what may be happening in your real life. Feminists come by the term via their ongoing pants-on-head appropriation of military clinical PTSD/cPTSD terminology (where they've also acquired "victim blaming", "triggers", etc. and then reframed them to produce maximal dysfunction) where i…
/r/MensRights17/01/20 09:26 AM
1

Legal Parental Surrender. Using "paternal" can give the false impression that women wouldn't have rights to LPS or that gender equal reproductive rights is something that only affects men.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 04:22 AM
1

You take responsibility for a potential child when you [...] have sex. So the usual anti-abortion argument... Can you offer an explanation for why you oppose gender equal reproductive rights?
/r/MensRights17/01/20 03:55 AM
1

Sounds like you may have just described child abuse, but didn't recognize it because the perpetrator was a woman and/or the victim was male.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 03:19 AM
1

I've noticed /stentorian46 around the sub posting these kinds of non sequitur comments demanding to be spoonfed and then abruptly dropping out of the conversation.
/r/MensRights17/01/20 03:14 AM
1

The quote sounds like Judicial Speak for "the legislature fucked up in not considering the scenario present in the case at hand".
/r/MensRights15/01/20 09:10 PM
3

Feminism is mostly an amalgamation of conspiracy theory (e.g. The Patriarchy) and rape fantasy.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 05:48 AM
1

Women are competitive about other things. Go read some mumsnet archives.
/r/MensRights12/01/20 01:30 AM
2

It's less a matter of whether it's possible and more straightforwardly that it just hasn't been done (yet). They cannot provide you with copies of records they do not have.
/r/MensRights11/01/20 01:50 AM
1

"Well, I can't give you that information. That is a HIPPA violation. The only way you can know the sex of the baby is if I give it to mom and she gives it to you." 45CFR164.524(c)(3)(ii) "If an individual's request for access directs the covered entity to transmit the copy of protected health information directly to another person designated by the individual, the covered entity must provide the copy to the person designated by the individual. The individual's request must be in writing, signed …
/r/MensRights10/01/20 04:41 AM
1

Start asking if they offer "lingamic massage".
/r/MensRights10/01/20 02:44 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter