TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FireReadyAim Archive

View 0 posts and 180 comments by FireReadyAim on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

Welcome to the real world reddit, where people post blatant lies with a "source" that doesn't confirm their story in the hopes that others will believe them without clicking through. (they will)
/r/MensRights18/04/17 03:59 PM
3

or at least not to a hundredth the degree The rest has been addressed pretty well, but this is exactly why I can never agree with third wave feminists. You agree that men experience the exact same things that you mentioned are a problem, but you don't act like it's a problem. These are things that should be unacceptable no matter what, not just when they happen to women.
/r/MensRights03/07/13 07:54 PM
-2

I think you're confusing bitterness with bemusement. I could not care less that most of the posts in this subreddit are butthurt whinging by people who aren't looking for a solution. P.S. - Yes, I know what bemusement means.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 09:18 PM
-3

Irrelevant post, meet JabCross. Oh, nevermind, I see that you two have already met.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 07:51 PM
-5

It's not all unwarranted bitterness, but it's still bitterness.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 04:37 PM
-21

You won't get far with that thinking here. This subreddit has two purposes. Being bitter Being bitter
/r/MensRights08/03/13 03:23 PM
3

Poe's law at work.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 06:16 PM
12

I love how everything she says is framed in phrases like "not that I've ever heard of" or as a rhetorical question, because she didn't bother to educate herself at all before shitting out a page of stupidity.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 03:31 PM
13

I think you're underestimating Connecticut, and English professors.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 03:30 PM
9

Most of the people pushing for removal are doing so because it's a bad article that needs to be started from scratch, not because the topic is bad.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 05:16 PM
211

It's a pretty bad article. Make it better if you want to help save it.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 05:27 AM
2

(lower) Judges can not and should not enforce laws selectively. If there's no room for interpretation on the law, which I suspect there is not, the judge has no choice but to enforce it.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 02:42 PM
1

The traditional response to this, and it's not entirely without merit, is that men are not typically held to the standards of men in video games.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 06:38 AM
84

targeted by feminists for who knows what reason She's sex-positive. That's a pretty good reason for a certain type of feminist to target her.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:34 PM
6

My point was that if you have not read and comprehended the entire article you are not in a position to know which information is unnecessary.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 06:07 PM
40

Here's a thought: If you are too stupid or lazy to read a "wordy and expansive" encyclopedia entry, you need to stay the fuck away from editing articles. To be clear, I completely believe that the wordiness of some articles does them a disservice and they should be pared down some (without losing content) but if you want to be the person to pare them down you have to read and comprehend all of the existing words.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 02:25 PM
3

I'm not sure if you are aware, but a certain subset of jokes are based on being offensive.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 01:56 PM
19

And now the egg is on their face, because being a shitty person and taking everybody's money and running deserves harassment.
/r/MensRights24/02/13 06:47 AM
2

If "diversity" to you is people who have different parts between their legs and are different colours, you are useless, racist, and sexist. Those traits should be insignificant. The problem here is that any policy that moves away from selecting editors based on anonymous merit will result in an inferior editorial staff. E: also, if you want to encourage true diversity, have candidates write about their life experiences and upbringing, and put some weight on that. I completely understand why it's…
/r/MensRights23/02/13 05:20 PM
13

You went to a shitty accountant.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 09:33 PM
6

If this is some kind of wacky meta trolling, you should get an award. If it's not, you should be institutionalized.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 06:49 PM
8

trigger warning? are you serious?
/r/MensRights17/02/13 10:04 PM
24

Wait what are you even talking about? SRS literally stands for ShitRedditSays. /r/ShitRedditSays is the original.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 04:26 PM
1

Interest and fees only apply if he owes. But even writing a program that calculated a running total would be trivial. E: basically I understand that it's a little more complicated, but not a lot more.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 01:08 AM
0

It's not. A man had a bad thing happen to him, maybe, so we have to get out our pitchforks!!!!
/r/MensRights16/02/13 09:43 PM
4

Okay, I am going to completely ignore whether or not this is a men's rights issue because I am pretty sure it's just a government incompetence issue. How the fuck does it take more than 30 seconds to audit that? Child support is very straight forward unless the payments get adjusted, in which case it's only fairly straight forward. Every n days one parent owes the other parent x dollars until the child is 18. x/n is the daily cost. Friends of the Court has a record of the payments, and they have…
/r/MensRights16/02/13 08:52 PM
0

I don't need to win if you haven't made an argument at all, which is apparently the case.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 04:33 PM
0

So your argument that the free market is bad is that there are laws making the market less free? Got it.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 10:12 PM
2

Free market. Take your money somewhere else you god damn baby. This has nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 05:03 PM
2

Gawker doesn't even pretend to be a news outlet, but people still treat it as one, which is a lot scarier.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 03:34 PM
1

People take Gawker seriously.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 03:33 PM
4

daily mail is not news. Stop treating it like it is.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 07:25 PM
5

so the tl;dr for her 3rd version of events is that they were having consensual sex and then he decided to put it in her pooper, which she didn't say no to, but didn't care for, and this justifies brutally murdering him? Lol.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 06:21 PM
4

A better definition of dumb might be dedicating what must have been countless hours to writing that article that A: is largely wrong and B: nobody gave a shit about.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 09:05 PM
8

I want a girlfriend who wouldn't make this list I think that pretty much covers it.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 08:59 PM
8

The truth is less than useless in court.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 12:49 AM
7

Obligated no... well at least no more obligated than a guy would be to say, shave his beard if that is what his gf preferred. Technically no one is really obligated to do anything. This has always been my interpretation when people ask this question. People who are in a relationship and touch each other are both obligated to groom themselves in a way that is acceptable to their partner. Nobody is going to make you shave your legs, or your beard, or your asscrack, but somebody might dump you and/…
/r/MensRights24/01/13 01:50 AM
117

good ol' RES. http://i.imgur.com/TUiRgOM.png
/r/MensRights23/01/13 02:52 AM
0

I dislike singular "they" a great deal. he/she and his/her are my preference when trying to preemptively shut people the fuck up.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 08:09 AM
2

I mean, technically, all people are potential rapists, though I imagine that quadriplegics and infants would have a lot of trouble to actually rape anyone.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 06:14 PM
0

I was making a joke, champ.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 03:43 PM
5

tl;dr: black people are rapists
/r/MensRights20/01/13 05:01 AM
7

That was pretty much what I took away from it. It's a dumb website probably run by a sad person, but there's no reason it should be shut down, and it's certainly not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 10:13 PM
17

Privacy violations? In case you weren't aware, the root word of privacy is "private". This is all information gathered from profiles that are either publicly visible, or visible after making a completely free OKC account.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 08:16 PM
26

Without even reading the article (I am super drunk) I can tell you what is keeping women out of the video game industry: they aren't stupid (or passionate, if you're feeling generous) enough to want to work 100-120 hour weeks for sometimes months at a time for shit pay.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 07:48 AM
7

Man, thanks for the reminder - I'm way behind to meet my rape and murder quota for the month. I need to get to work. I already missed my quota two months ago, so I'm on probation; if I'm not careful I might have my patriarchy card taken away.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 11:07 PM
2

Are you secretly garret dillahunt?
/r/MensRights14/01/13 03:38 PM
2

No it wouldn't. Not when the victim is family. Naming the defendant effectively also names the victim. Most reputable publications have the sense to realize that it's not hard to connect the dots between "jeffrey goldstein of Michigan rapes daughter" and "anna goldstein, daughter of jeffrey goldstein of Michigan".
/r/MensRights12/01/13 08:15 AM
5

That's not justice.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 08:12 AM
53

Its almost as though rape isn't exclusively committed by either men or women, but maybe, just maybe, rapists rape. It's almost as if criminals don't just do what they're told.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 08:40 PM
0

I passed economics.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 12:06 AM
0

In this scenario, the person who sold me the $50 bill paid $30 for my $20 bill. Get it? It wasn't free. Saving money in the long run is utterly unrelated to arbitrarily paying $30 over the face value of a banknote.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 09:17 PM
1

In what possible world is "free" relative? It's an absolute word.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 05:03 PM
-7

What should be illegal? Being too inept to carefully follow instructions? I agree.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 04:02 PM
98

Nothing is free.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 04:00 PM
63

"A man who has a lot of sex is regarded as a stud, but a woman who has a lot of sex is regarded as a slut." Only vaguely related, but I enjoy Jim Jefferies's (humorous) take on this: "Being a slut is fuckin' easy. Being a stud is fuckin' hard. I've seen plenty of fat ugly sluts. I've never seen a fat ugly stud."
/r/MensRights29/12/12 05:41 PM
1

whom is used when it refers to the object of the sentence, in this case, the Mr. Banks story. The subject of the sentence is the MRA, which is what the "who" refers to. I hope this doesn't sound too spergy, just trying to be helpful.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 03:24 AM
2

In addition to dishes and dirty clothes, my bed also features a number of books, charging electronics, and notepads. Being a bachelor is great.
/r/MensRights29/12/12 02:11 AM
1

Only correcting you because of the context of your post. An MRA who is a good writer
/r/MensRights28/12/12 10:34 PM
5

Doesn't matter to me if 2% is accurate. That means that 2 in 100 rape accusations are made up. 2 people in 100 who could end up just like this kid and have done absolutely nothing wrong except associate with a piece of human garbage like Wanetta Gibson.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 10:33 PM
10

She doesn't even have to give back the 1.5 million dollars her and her lawyer got from the city thanks to her lies. The 1.5 million she spent half of while on public assistance. What a fucking piece of trash.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 10:31 PM
4

But guys, false rape accusations don't real, remember? This can't possibly have happened! On a more serious note, the part that left me absolutely seething was that he can get, at most, $200,000. So it turns out that 5 years of his life gone forever is worth less than 30% of ~30 minutes of fabricated suffering by that awful woman.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 10:31 PM
0

That's the experience I had as well. (the dick cop part, not the getting hit with an ESW part.) While I am not advocating arming teachers, per se, I do find it peculiar that people believe it to be a completely absurd thing to allow teachers with CHLs to carry in school when they're already allowed to carry in a number of other places with a lot of children present.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 05:40 PM
2

Absolutely. As anyone who has attended a public school with a police officer regularly present will tell you, the officer will find ways to be a nuisance the 99.9999% of the time that nobody is being shot. More importantly though, it's insanely expensive and not necessarily terribly effective.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 04:46 PM
25

The NRA's eventual position on the matter was also terrible.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 03:56 AM
9

Your assumption that all feminists are the same is exactly the problem. It's not true, and it's not constructive. Similarly, all MRAs are not the same. For example, I'm quite sure that I am nothing like you.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 08:12 AM
1

He who fights with monsters might take care, lest he thereby become a monster. Revenge doesn't really have a happy ending.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 08:44 AM
1

Agreed. My point is this: that makes this a medical malpractice/legal system issue. A basic men's rights litmus test is this: Is <bad thing> possible/happening because the person it's happening to is a man? The answer here is a resounding "No". A female surgeon/GP/whatever could easily perform a vasectomy, and then she'd be the person opening herself up to a lawsuit.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 04:20 PM
2

Asshole is gender neutral. Presumably it was a woman, but it doesn't change he story.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 12:58 AM
-4

This is not at all a men's rights issue. Some asshole sued some surgeon somewhere and ruined his life after he performed a vasectomy, this doctor heard about it, and isn't willing to risk having the same happen to him. The problem here is that anybody can and will sue anybody else for any reason.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 10:14 PM
2

It's a bit over-exaggerated and reinforced by cultural stereotypes Yes, that's kind of how jokes work.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 04:24 PM
2

That's so far beyond false. My friend withdrew from all of his classes two different semesters and still finished his degree on the government's dime.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 02:43 AM
6

Oh bloo blee bloo I screwed around and wasted all of the money the government gave me and now I might be punished for it. This is terrible and obviously because I'm a man. Spoilers: mistakes have consequences.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 01:57 AM
3

Your comment is ironic because ArchangelFuhkEsarhes's use of "ironic" wasn't really wrong. recovering_PMO's ahem suggestion to use "hypocritical" instead may have fit better, but that's about it.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 02:10 PM
12

My favourite part is that she assumes that all MRAs are extremists, and then assumes that most feminists are not.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:24 PM
8

Is it really so offensive to some people to imagine that men suffer too? Yes. Because attention is a zero sum game, and attention is what college freshman (taking a guess here) who talk about gender issues want.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 04:38 PM
17

Shut the fuck up.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 03:40 PM
1

False. The knife hand is reserved for DIs.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 07:38 AM
0

Yes, it certainly should be a respectable community, but it's an uphill battle that few really even want to fight. Get a bunch of people together who all agree with each other on a divisive issue, see how much thought provoking discussion happens.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 03:18 PM
-2

It just fosters circlejerking. Welcome to Reddit. I'm really not sure what else to say.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 03:10 PM
-1

It's like me saying, a majority of rapes are committed by males, OH MEN! Many people say exactly that, which was precisely Thievishmetal77's point.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:50 PM
5

Today you're learning a valuable lesson: not everything famous people say is accurate.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:48 PM
3

Based on context it's pretty clear he meant "biased towards women"
/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:40 PM
0

Man, I didn't know you were insane. People like you are why MRAs are either thought of as extremists or idiots. (you are both)
/r/MensRights10/12/12 02:38 PM
7

80k/year as a web designer is on the high end (for jobs that aren't in the bay area) - definitely not the pay a dabbler would start off at.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 01:50 AM
1

Nobody is going to extradite over child support. It's not a federal issue - the US would never even request extradition.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 01:48 AM
26

Bitcoins are pretty volatile, and also quite a new currency. Were I a man in my 50s trying to flee the country and find stability elsewhere, I wouldn't be in a hurry to dump my life savings into them.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 06:05 PM
28

It's baffling to me that after she chooses to move, you're the one who is punished for it.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 05:04 PM
67

Have you considered the benefits of having your entire savings issued to you in the form of a bank check, and then wiring it all via money order to a numbered account and then moving to another country?
/r/MensRights08/12/12 03:44 PM
2

It's fun that being drunk apparently justifies stabbing somebody, but not raping somebody. Apparently only men choose to drink to excess, so only they have to be held responsible for their actions when they do.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 10:13 PM
7

I also hate jokes.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 09:06 PM
0

You realize this is on the same level of "Why isn't it MAIL PERSON?!?!?!?!" right?
/r/MensRights02/12/12 01:12 AM
3

I guess you missed the part where I said that most of those situations would apply to both genders?
/r/MensRights30/11/12 01:54 PM
2

I cannot think of a single legitimate reason to avoid going to the police regarding a sexual assault that you have already publicly accused a person of. To be clear, I totally get why people are reticent to talk about being sexually assaulted, but... she's already talked about it.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 09:59 PM
184

A lot of these really depend on the two most important rules, and I think probably go both ways: be attractive don't be unattractive
/r/MensRights29/11/12 07:50 PM
11

It's pretty funny/sad that you need a police report to get the insurance company to write you a check for a $100 ipod, but it is not necessary to file charges before getting a person expelled from university for rape.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 07:11 PM
2

This does have the silver lining of obliterating the claim that men who say "Don't dress that way if you don't want to be raped" are sexist - turns out they're probably just assholes.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 12:34 AM
14

You make jokes - Jezebel wrote basically the same article within the last few days.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 03:58 AM
8

If you are labeling it mutilation, as do I, then by the very definition it is physically dangerous. When is mutilation not dangerous? This is absolutely the most ludicrous line of logic I have seen in my entire life.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 03:45 AM
9

[people] think they should just 'man up' and deal with it. Which is amusingly one of the issues men face.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 09:14 PM
-7

I do. Because any statement suggesting that the man was in any way in the wrong in this subreddit will be met with every attempt to silence you.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 07:49 PM
1

Let me know how that argument works out for you in court.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 01:33 AM
0

You need to remember that the average person doesn't know how to vote let alone think. And you need to remember that that doesn't change the validity of the rules.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 12:41 AM
0

No. Assuming you aren't trolling me, consider this: When you enter a fine dining establishment, you implicitly agree to behave in a certain fashion. Nobody has to explain to you that you aren't allowed to get violently drunk, or sing karaoke, or fart loudly as you walk past another table, and nobody has to ask you to sign a contract agreeing to not do that shit. If you fail to maintain a certain level of decorum, you will be asked to leave. Also, back on the topic of the Violence Against Women A…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 08:24 PM
1

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/implicit?s=t
/r/MensRights19/11/12 06:48 PM
-1

Yes all rules are made-up you stupid fuck. The laws are rules we've all implicitly agreed to by living in our particular society. Go say useless shit somewhere else.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 02:01 PM
2

I would like to meet a person who believes anyone has ever contested her "right" to let her body hair run wild. Are there police in NYC just running around arresting people for having leg hair? I personally would be less interested in dating her because I think that body hair is gross, (mine too) but unless I'm dating her... who the fuck cares what I think?
/r/MensRights19/11/12 12:07 AM
2

They aren't called Jezbians for nothing.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 12:00 AM
0

What the actual fuck.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 11:56 PM
0

Because the answer to your question is irrelevant given the information I provided. Can't really say that I am surprised to see you all behaving just like feminists though. "Someone doesn't want to help men, crucify them!"
/r/MensRights18/11/12 01:38 PM
-7

The irony is, of course, that your comment is nothing but redirection.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 04:33 AM
-4

No, but if you'd like I can explain to you that charities are private organizations and should be free to help precisely whoever the fuck they want to. If we go ahead and take the belief that charities shouldn't be allowed to exclude people who need help to its logical end, organizations that collect money for scholarships for minorities should be obligated to buy condoms for people in Nigeria, right? They need the help, you can't discriminate!
/r/MensRights18/11/12 03:54 AM
-10

i mean for christ sake, freaking charity should not discriminate against the needy! This I disagree with entirely. Different problems are important to different people. Of course, it'd be lovely to see more shelters dedicated to men and their needs.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 01:53 AM
1

Taco Bell has been good at social media for a while.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 05:54 PM
12

And then that single genetic person would get a particular virus she is vulnerable to and the species would go extinct.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 03:39 PM
9

Well, assuming perfect asexual reproduction (as in, no mutations) it'd just result in clones of the parents. There would, presumably, still be some level of mutation, but no mixing of genetic material. Every time a "line" of people died off, that genetic material would leave the gene pool forever, and there wouldn't really be an effective way to create new genetic material.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 03:19 PM
66

I'm sure all of those STRONG WOMEN would find a way to reproduce asexually. They don't need men for anything, remember? Edit: Although, asexual reproduction would probably still result in extinction due to lack of genetic diversity.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 02:55 PM
131

So if we eliminate male privilege AND things that are unfair to women apparently it's not okay for anyone to ask anyone out.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 01:55 PM
10

Or shorter. Or they're accurate. Who knows! I own two pairs of jeans because I'm a disgusting slob, one is 29x30, one is 32x30. The first pair fits well around the waist and is too long, the other is a little tight around the waist and the length is good.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 02:39 AM
0

I've already answered all of your questions at least one. Read my responses again, or don't, I don't care.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 02:18 PM
-1

Oh boy you gave one example from each gender, I guess I'm 100% wrong and women always pay less than men for insurance. Bill and Susan live next door to each other, and they're both looking for car insurance. They've been driving the same amount of time, are the same age, let's say 24, and have the same model and size of car. Their driving histories are identical in terms of claims and accidents, etc. At present, Bill would still have to pay more than Susan because he is a man. Explain why this i…
/r/MensRights14/11/12 04:44 AM
0

Being the victim of a confidence scheme is quite literally caused by being stupid. It's not like being raped or something. The whole point is that you hand over the money willingly because you aren't smart or clever enough to see that you're being cheated. Edit: I am not arguing, nor do I believe that those people deserved to be ripped off, just that the assertion that they are stupid is most likely an accurate one; At the very least it's not a wholly inaccurate assertion to make.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 04:10 AM
-1

How retarded do you have to be to fail to understand that on paper gender is just another risk factor? It doesn't matter if I addressed it directly. "male = .05% higher chance of causing xyz type of claim" is different in NO WAY from "lives on 3rd street = .05% higher chance of causing xyz type of claim" or "Has had an accident in the past = .05% higher chance of causing xyz type of claim". Don't blame the insurance company, blame facts. Also I still don't know why the fuck you think a good male…
/r/MensRights14/11/12 04:07 AM
-1

Perhaps, but why should a careful male driver pay more than a shitty female driver? What the fuck are you even talking about now? Do you have any idea how insurance rates work? Your demographic is a starting point, not the end point. Do you not understand that all 16 year old men do not pay the exact same insurance premiums? Risk management and actuarial analysis 101, just for you: I'm starting an insurance company, I know that I need to offset the risk of potential payouts over a given period o…
/r/MensRights14/11/12 03:21 AM
-1

You've clearly missed the extremely basic fact that insurance is based on risk management. It does not matter how carefully you drive; the only way to completely guarantee that you will never make a claim is to not drive, and that's why that's the only way (in most states) to avoid having insurance premiums based on the best available data. If you invent a way to see the future I'm sure insurance companies will be very interested. How can you still not understand that equal pricing is not actual…
/r/MensRights14/11/12 01:20 AM
7

Being equal in the eyes of the law is the very definition of equality of opportunity.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 12:09 AM
1

I agree that it's something worth working towards in the sense that people should be able to achieve without being held back, but really what that amounts to is equality of opportunity. The simple fact is that some people are better than others. No matter how badly various support structures hamstring the best and prop up the worst, that fact will not change. Furthermore, not everybody even wants the same outcome, so at best you railroad people into an "equal" life that is still more enjoyable f…
/r/MensRights12/11/12 11:31 PM
17

Not all drivers HAVE a driving history. Especially since the women in the article are 18. Insurance companies do base fees on driving history, but they also base it on what they believe they can expect you to cost them in the future. One serious accident will offset a LIFETIME of insurance premiums, so it actually does not matter that you haven't been in an accident in 5 years. Unless you can show that you'll never be in a collision, which you can't, your past is only so useful in estimating fut…
/r/MensRights12/11/12 08:52 PM
11

Perhaps you should learn how actuarial analysis and risk management work.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 07:12 PM
17

The funny thing is that it's not even actual equality - previously women's rates were lower because as a demographic they cost the insurance company less money. Women get into more accidents, but they're usually minor fender benders. The accidents men get into result in death and destruction and fireballs. Equality of outcome is the shittiest, most illogical goal for a society to have.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 06:38 PM
1

It's entirely possible that he was just not interested in having sex. While I agree that's very important for a couple to agree on sex (and money) in order for the relationship to work, my point was really the disparity in how people react.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 03:19 PM
4

I do not see where (presumably) she is going with that. Is she saying that men are assumed to be much smarter than women and exercise common sense in potentially dangerous situations without being told to do so?
/r/MensRights11/11/12 07:12 PM
1

So not only were you in the chair force, but you're a bigot too? This is too good.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 12:34 AM
1

If it were something that really happened, yes, I'd think that.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 06:51 PM
29

I'm 100% onboard the spite plan. Just re-write the essay bigger and better than it was before.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 03:00 AM
0

I went to war for your right to express this dribble? Based on the fact that you don't realize that the word you wanted was "drivel", I am going to go out on a limb and guess that you went to war because you are stupid, and couldn't think of anything else to do after every college rejected you. I have a new hypothesis: they excluded you because you're a huge whiny pussy, and not a very likable person. I'll also do you the solid of spelling out my earlier comment: The question I attributed to you…
/r/MensRights09/11/12 10:23 PM
1

You're the one crying because you didn't get included, so... Also, I'd check your reading comprehension skills.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 05:51 PM
0

"waaaaa, waaaaa, why isn't the world fair?" Who gives a shit? It's not.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 01:58 PM
1

I think a lot of people would have an issue with me if I did that, since it'd have to be somebody else's kid.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 05:53 AM
1

I could probably fit a small child into my messenger bag with room left for my laptop and charger.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 05:44 AM
2

That pretty well conveys why those should be appointed and not elected positions.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 05:17 AM
2

For sure, but I think we should HEAVILY discourage the trope of "I'm being excluded because of my gender!" because that's what gets extreme feminists into trouble. If there are other possible explanations for your problem, explore them. I think it's safe to say that we here all recognize the damage that women who fall back to "You're only doing this because I'm a woman!" whenever they don't get their way are doing to their movement. I don't want us to fall victim to the same thing.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 07:41 PM
9

It's entirely possible that you were met with resistance because you're an outsider, not because you're a man. If it's something that is important to you, I'd suggest giving it some time.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 10:57 PM
2

Bankrupt the bitch. She's crazy, and abused the legal system to punish you for unknown reasons. I can't imagine you'll have a lot of trouble demonstrating that she knowingly abused the legal system, which should turn the courts against her.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 10:40 PM
3

why the FUCK would I go out with a guy who wasn't interested enough in me to pay for the first date? Why the FUCK would a guy want to date someone who believes she is entitled to having the first date paid for? I am just so put off by the idea of an adult man in my social class trying to nickel-and-dime me on a first date. Really shows how much you have missed the point. The trend of men paying for dates started when women rarely worked, and if they did, it was part time, so the man would pretty…
/r/MensRights07/11/12 06:39 AM
1

Nobody wants to be at a club that only has dudes in it. No club wants to have only dudes in it, because (straight) guys do not shower other guys in expensive drinks. The sort of customers clubs are looking to attract want to be in a place with a good ratio of men:women, so they have to let in a good ratio of men:women. If the bar was completely filled with women they would stop letting women in, but that doesn't really happen. Same reason many clubs have a different cover charge for men and wome…
/r/MensRights07/11/12 06:22 AM
5

Oh I know, she's definitely crazy and wrong. I was just being pedantic.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 06:46 AM
16

Child sexual abuse is a different crime. Before a certain age consent is irrelevant, for exactly the reason you were getting at. While we basically punish statutory rape because as a society we like to demonize sex, I think that most people accept that teenagers are cognizant of what they are doing, and at least have some grasp of the potential consequences, even if they ignore them. Before puberty, on the other hand, I think it's generally accepted that consent can't really be given in a meanin…
/r/MensRights06/11/12 06:00 AM
79

I mean... technically 100% of people who are "victims" of statutory rape are "asking for it". If they weren't voluntary participants it'd be a different charge.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 02:03 AM
2

While I see what you're getting at, Napkin math is more than enough when the numbers are so widely disparate. In order for me to have reached the wrong conclusion, my math would have to be off by 11,000%.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 11:22 PM
1

Looking to it for inspiration and comparing the two are different. I think it's fucking retarded that "should we treat these human beings like human beings?" is even a discussion that needs to be had, but that doesn't justify the positions some people have taken.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 08:07 PM
2

Even if we scale it up for the population of the world. US population in 2005 was ~290m, world population was maybe 6.3b. If domestic violence in the US is a reasonable sample of domestic violence in the world, perhaps 25,000 women were killed by it in 2005. Half-assedly adjusting for population growth, perhaps 150,000 over 5 years. Yep, I'd say that's pretty close to 16.5 million! Unless we assume she is saying that more women died in domestic violence cases than women died in WWI, in which cas…
/r/MensRights05/11/12 07:19 PM
25

That's right up there with gay rights activists comparing their plight with that of black people in the 60s in terms of being offensive. While I absolutely think that gay people should have the same legal rights as straight people, if you can have a parade where you are wearing nothing but daisy dukes and glitter and the reaction from onlookers is, at worst, "Ugh, that's annoying.", you're not that goddamn oppressed. Until there are fire hoses and attack dogs, that comparison is off-limits.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 07:13 PM
3

I don't really understand the purpose of her trying. It's not as if the men's group is assigned as the "better" group. It's the group for men. Am I wrong in assuming that ski races are determined by finishing time? If the men race on the same course, she will know if she beat them or not anyway.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 03:19 PM
1

I wish the writer of that blog had learned to copy-edit and spellcheck.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 03:15 PM
1

Yeah, because the sociopolitical climate is exactly the same as it was when discrimination based on race was legal. /s
/r/MensRights05/11/12 03:08 PM
1

When I first went there I was like "BBQ in a gas station, what could go wrong, hah!" and then I basically immediately had to eat my words. (and a second sandwich)
/r/MensRights05/11/12 02:00 PM
1

Realistically all that would do is ensure that bigoted idiots (separate traits) can't run businesses. People of all races would FLEE from a place with listed price differences for <minority>.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 07:39 AM
1

Yelp is horseshit. They hide/bury any business that won't pay them.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 07:37 AM
1

When I was living in Houston I mostly ate BBQ at Goode Co. and Rudy's.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 07:35 AM
2

If that's true, that's completely retarded. Fucking call it a "large" and "small" portion and let people decide how hungry they are.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 07:34 AM
9

The title should really be "Don't date narcissistic sociopaths" There are plenty of single moms out there who aren't even looking for a father for their child, necessarily. Just because she has a kid doesn't mean she doesn't want companionship, or is a bad person. I am also incredibly angry that that shithead is allowed to be a judge.
/r/MensRights05/11/12 07:21 AM
-1

If he's any good at the subject matter he can convey things in a way that is easy to understand.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 05:34 PM
1

Curious about your cooking claim, though. Anecdotally, I can name at least 5 famous, extremely successful non-guy fieri (and critically well received) male chefs, and not a single female one, though I am sure they exist.
/r/MensRights03/11/12 02:35 AM
13

It's completely meaningless. Consent can be withdrawn at any time, technically. If I say I'm for it, sign the contract, record the video interview, whatever, and then as soon as we start I change my mind, the "contract" is invalid and if you continue I'm being raped. That's why you don't have sex with crazies.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 04:49 PM
1

While I am completely in favour of allowing so-called "financial abortions" your argument is not a good one. It's not so much that an abortion allows a woman to avoid responsibility, it's that there's no longer a need for anyone to be responsible for the child, so it's a non-issue. If the child is born, somebody has to be responsible for it, so the issue becomes more complex.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 04:00 PM
27

I have not never once seen a penis (that didn't belong to me) and thought anything but "I'd prefer if I weren't looking at that penis."
/r/MensRights01/11/12 02:19 PM
1

"He's just acting that way because the social worker is around!" It's extremely easy to create a certain perception by firing the first shot, especially in any situation where emotions run high.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 04:26 AM
1

"Hello, 911? my ex-boyfriend, he just sniffle he threatened to hit our son! I'm scared." Bam, visitation rights gone until if/when he proves in court that he didn't do that, and she can make the same call next month.
/r/MensRights31/10/12 10:25 PM
3

OP: Unless you want to raise a kid alone(if you can successfully spend more money than her in court to win custody), or raise a kid around a mother who is batshit crazy, I highly recommend pushing for abortion. If you don't fight her tooth and nail she will get custody, so if you aren't financially capable of fighting for and caring for the kid, your choices are either abortion or seeing how fucked up the kid has gotten on your supervised weekend visits. Food for thought: if she's this chaotic a…
/r/MensRights31/10/12 09:40 PM
6

Clicked the link saw "alllie is an ignored user". Feels good.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 08:45 PM
37

I know women exactly like that. It could be trolling, but it's not like those people do not exist.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 01:27 PM
1

I don't necessarily agree with FountainheadShrugged (an obvious troll) but everyone who upvoted you like it was a legitimate comparison is dumber than FountainheadShrugged is.
/r/MensRights25/10/12 02:04 PM
11

I have the answer for you: It's super easy to think whatever you want when you just make things up that back your position. See: religion, North Korea. Facts are just another tool of oppression wielded by The Patriarchy™.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 11:41 PM
3

A most acceptable reason. That's a bummer.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 05:09 PM
3

Looks like you better fire 23 people who are good at their jobs and hire 23 randos off the street who probably don't even want to work in finance.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 01:49 PM
4

Well you're pretty dumb for not going into a career you wanted because somebody called you a fag.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 01:47 PM
29

Well, just contextually, false reports of rape are worse than false reports of other crimes because the stigma associated with it doesn't go away and it's often hard to prove. If I get accused of stealing and I can prove that I don't have the shit I am accused of stealing, people just move on. The accuser pays my lawyer, everything is fine. If I get accused of raping someone, my life is pretty much over before I even get to court. Also the more gender-neutral reason that evidence exists at least…
/r/MensRights20/10/12 09:02 PM
1

I meant ethically, not legally. Obviously legally it's an (intentionally) muddled load of indeterminable bullshit.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 06:48 PM
1

But it actually is black and white. If a person attacks you, defend yourself.
/r/MensRights20/10/12 06:00 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter