TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Flamehazr444 Archive

View 0 posts and 49 comments by Flamehazr444 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-1

But would yall salute the Ukrainian woman that goes stoically to feed her mother and siblings? You ignore or hate women who are paragons of masculine traits but also cry when all women aren’t forced to be you? What do you want?
/r/MensRights25/04/26 09:54 PM
-3

Except that wasn’t my goal at all. This is horrible and we should view it with contempt, but OP’s fighting ghosts. There are women in this conflict too. Rich men sent them to die too. Gender and feminism have nothing to do with this. Also not sure how allowing half the population to enlist “cherry picking.”
/r/MensRights25/04/26 09:43 PM
-2

What’s crazy is yall are using this persons horrible reality to try insult feminism somehow. If this is true this is unconscionable and exactly why you oppose all fascism at all times. How did feminism connect?
/r/MensRights25/04/26 08:34 PM
-5

You know women served in the Russian military before American women served in ours right? So there are women that signed up for this conflict. Also you ever heard of Debra Sampson? America’s mulan that fought in the revolution and was vouched for by Paul Revere.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 08:30 PM
-6

Haha! Strong, independent young lady.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 07:48 PM
-3

Booom! Perfect response to that persons dumb-ish. I have a shirt that say “You wouldn’t have to defend your daughters if you properly raised your sons.”
/r/MensRights07/03/26 06:15 PM
-11

Ha. Thats pretty funny. And not untrue. World needs new management
/r/MensRights26/02/26 11:52 AM
1

Also Scientologists force their members to do a ritual/process called “auditing” when you confess your deepest secrets that they record to use for blackmail. Not setting up any trick, it was right there in front of you. This is common knowledge.
/r/MensRights04/12/25 10:53 PM
1

Who are you, the host of Fresh and Fit? What shit stained corner of the manosphere did that “wisdom” come from? But seriously, why do you need that to be true? Not asking why you think it’s true, why do you NEED it to be true? Because it’s not. What do you gain from thinking about women this way?
/r/MensRights04/12/25 10:50 PM
-8

What “war?” Seeking equal representation under the law and the right to self determine and self express is a war to you?
/r/MensRights04/12/25 09:09 PM
3

Oh yeah, women are always talking about wanting men who are open and emotionally available, but that’s just so they can trap em! Every woman is a trained Scientologist collecting blackmail while pretending to support you! Um no. Just no.
/r/MensRights04/12/25 09:06 PM
0

Amen! That’s what dudes on here don’t get and it blows my mind! Your problems are real, your pain is real, the feminazi agenda ain’t!
/r/MensRights04/12/25 08:29 PM
-13

Then break up? You’re with the wrong person? Why is it her fault you’re dating someone you don’t like? My partner vents about work and drama less than she does stuff like Kaiju No. 8’s s2 finale or politics. Find the right person or accept you’re settling and stop complaining.
/r/MensRights04/12/25 08:25 PM
-14

Wow bro, virgin or divorced? Been dating women for nigh on 20yrs and have yet to have a woman turn on me during her period. Pretty sure if you have, it’s because you’re a pain 100% of the time but the 3-5 days she’s on the mend she doesn’t have patience for it.
/r/MensRights04/12/25 08:01 PM
0

Ma’am, you hate yourself so much don’t you? You’re a misogynist queer woman with an NB partner and you spew this garbage? I don’t have an argument for you only pity.
/r/MensRights03/12/25 01:39 AM
0

Wow, you wasted a lot of time on a thing I didn’t read. Anyway, interact with more women, understand that this place is an echo chamber, and try to remember that feminism is about lifting up women, not tearing down men.
/r/MensRights03/12/25 01:27 AM
-1

Oh honey, no. No. If you really care about victims you’d acknowledge men commit 80% of violent crimes and 75% of white collar crimes. Men make victims. Ignoring the power dynamic at play and blaming women for all your problems is just self serving and childish. And do you not see the blatant hypocrisy in “empathy for victims, not identities” but your goal is to “addressing social issues MEN face.” You’re LARPing as someone who understands social issues but you’re really just parroting progressiv…
/r/MensRights02/12/25 02:03 PM
-2

I think you misread the question. Feminists/progressives have those things. Men’s rights guys only have excuses and shit posts about women wanting to have what they have.
/r/MensRights02/12/25 01:28 PM
0

Complaining about random things and equality. It’s so fun. I can imagine that women and the majority of men that don’t agree with me are wrong for wanting women to have what I could have had a generation ago but can’t now because other men took it from me. And I don’t get laid.
/r/MensRights02/12/25 01:26 PM
-15

Ha, this is funny. It’s sardonic yall.
/r/MensRights18/11/25 06:16 PM
2

There’s no way on earth that if any of this is true, the cheating happened the way that was said. I’m poly, my gf doesn’t talk about the dick she gets to this level and it’s not an admission of guilt. Also the other man was a porn star specifically.
/r/MensRights17/11/25 03:28 PM
2

You know…most ppl have no time or interest in “shit tests.” Seems like you’re over estimating the thought that goes into shit behavior.
/r/MensRights17/11/25 03:22 PM
1

Why are you crying about someone from 20yrs ago? This is not a French art house film where any lost love is worth opining over. You think she still thinks about that guys dick? No. No she doesn’t. But u do. Just be happy for her. Better yet, be nothing for her and download the MeetUp app. Meet friends, find plutonic joy in every sense.
/r/MensRights17/11/25 03:20 PM
2

Yeah I agree. I think your point is well stated and while I can nitpick some details (I DO NOT want men locked up without cause, women who are raped CAN go back to their abuser) I whole heartedly agree with it. I was just arguing that a person’s sexual history in general shouldn’t be considered when deciding a defendant’s guilt. Personal interactions however are definitely relevant. They don’t DECIDE it, you can call someone for sex and change your mind, but I agree a jury should be able to weig…
/r/MensRights13/11/25 08:35 PM
1

Pass. I’ll take the L. You put a source up for review, got mad when it didn’t support your point and got mad at me for citing it because the point is “women were asked about a woman talking about women proves men aren’t listened to.” You’re all over the place. Like, you think the left is which are the feminists aren’t against domestic violence? “Vulnerability as a way to…blah” isn’t even close to a point I made. Dispositive’s good though. New word for me.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 08:23 PM
0

We have reached detente sir. I will forgo the vernacular of the previous generation while proclaiming that we aligned in this matter and have no use for further hostility or barbs.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 07:32 PM
-4

Also this doesn’t really undercut my argument at all. Even if say nursing or social work is mostly women, if men own the hospital/company, men do the managing, and men control the wealth generated from these fields the number of women doesn’t count for much.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 06:51 PM
-2

Um, did you read the article? It’s at least partly arguing against the premise Andrews’ is putting forth. “Helen Andrews’ “Great Feminization” hypothesis would benefit from a little more of the concrete, data-driven analysis that she thinks working women neglect. If she is worried that “the rule of law will not survive the legal profession becoming majority female,” why have industries already dominated by women (pharmacy, veterinary medicine) not collapsed.”
/r/MensRights13/11/25 06:46 PM
1

And I’m gonna need a source on evidence that “they’ve knowingly lied before” is inadmissible in court. The assertion is ridiculous on its face. Like, you’re saying that categorically, in all legal cases proof that someone lied isn’t admissible? Or do you think just in SA cases?
/r/MensRights13/11/25 06:34 PM
1

“Prior to the 1970s, marital rape was legal in every US state and only first became partially outlawed in Michigan and Delaware in 1974, then wholly outlawed in South Dakota and Nebraska in 1975.[1][2] The court case Oregon v. Rideout in 1978 was the first in which someone stood trial for raping their spouse while they lived together. By 1993, marital rape was a crime nationwide.[3] Still, in the 1990s, most states continued to differentiate between the way marital rape and non-marital rape were…
/r/MensRights13/11/25 06:23 PM
1

Alternate theory (the correct one) SA was never taken seriously so things that were assaults were dismissed and campaigns of reform have taken the shame away from making accusations and let survivors (regardless of gender) feel like there was a point to going to court. For example SA of a spouse historically wasn’t a crime but has been made one relatively recently. It’s not that rules were changed to make more things assault, assault was happening the whole time and it was just let go. Also that…
/r/MensRights13/11/25 06:10 PM
2

Oooh, good catch. “Unless proven guilty?” No! OJ Simpson!
/r/MensRights13/11/25 05:47 PM
0

You see the problem with your argument right? Having sexual encounters/relationships can only count as reckless if SA is a possibility. If men weren’t likely to r8pe a woman then no amount of protected sex wud be dangerous. Also proof of lying (full on perjury once it gets to court) is completely separate from the sexual history. Proof of past false allegations of any kind would be considered if client were provably a virgin.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 05:35 PM
2

Cool. WOULD you respond to the argument? Also, I spelled it that way on purpose so it doesn’t really cut me to have that corrected.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 05:20 PM
-10

If you let someone borrow your car, then they steal it, can you not say that was a different circumstance and therefore a crime? If they had sex before but said no the one time that’s being discussed in court, that’s it, that’s a wrap, that’s a r8pe!
/r/MensRights13/11/25 04:37 PM
-6

What do you mean? I’m just a male feminist that supports and works with DV/SA survivors. One of my roles involves getting them legal reps. I know how these cases go. Let me just ask, how wud a woman’s sexual history affect whether the men were guilty or not? And how wud that play out with another violent crime. Wud your driving history affect someone stealing your car?
/r/MensRights13/11/25 04:27 PM
-8

Wait. I admit I didn’t fully read the article, mea culpa, but you’re kidding right? They say they weren’t given a fair trial cus they cudnt ask the victims their body count or sex history? You’re out of your mind. You don’t do that with any other kind of assault. “You say I strangled you huh? How many other ppl strangled you? Do ppl often want to beat you up?” How wud that line of questioning affect the culpability for THEIR actions?
/r/MensRights13/11/25 04:09 PM
-10

Women are in charge because the male hegemony that holds power cares about women? Isn’t it more likely that men like you are in charge and they just disagree with you?
/r/MensRights13/11/25 04:01 PM
2

Is this a troll post? They’re putting on an organized campaign to make a survivors life worse? Even if the one case is fake (I doubt it) there’s no way that if they do this to multiple women they will ALWAYS be right. Should we harass the victims of car jackings or stabbings?
/r/MensRights13/11/25 03:59 PM
-2

I'm confused. What's y'all's problem here? Ive had a partner ask this. I've had multiple female partners want to hold my dick while I pee. You get weirdly curious and a sexual partner is an easy and safe way to explore that curiosity. Besides, the poster is just remarking on a pattern they've noticed. I'm assuming part of why they ask partners now is cus the ones in the past were so scared. I'm curious now too. Why wud you be so scared for a sexual partner to see your body? Lastly, "No means, No…
/r/MensRights13/11/25 03:11 PM
-1

I’m confused. What's y'all's problem here? Ive had a partner ask this. I've had multiple female partners want to hold my dick while I pee. You get weirdly curious and a sexual partner is an easy and safe way to explore that curiosity. Besides, the poster is just remarking on a pattern they've noticed. I'm assuming part of why they ask partners now is cus the ones in the past were so scared. I'm curious now too. Why wud you be so scared for a sexual partner to see your body? Lastly, "No means, No…
/r/MensRights13/11/25 02:52 PM
0

…she doesn’t tho. She just wants to see it briefly. So why are you mad at her?
/r/MensRights13/11/25 12:39 PM
1

Look, I’m not trying to insult you or take you down a peg at all. I was just taught that if you’re going to be anything, be self aware. And honestly, with love, it’s kinda sad when some hates others for the negative thing they also do.
/r/MensRights13/11/25 12:13 PM
-1

No. But seriously, you’re on a Reddit about male “oppression.” She’s saying that individual interactions she’s had aren’t equitable for whatever reason (agree or don’t that’s fine), but you’re the one complaining about systemic “mistreatment.” Like I get it, you’ve seen ppl use that “Did you stretch…” line and everyone clapped, but respond to my point. You brought up oppression, you are on a Reddit about you being “oppressed,” don’t you think it’s hypocritical to attack her for the thing you are…
/r/MensRights13/11/25 12:01 PM
0

How do you know? You don’t know what she looks like or anything about her. I don’t either, but based on this, why wudnt that be appealing?
/r/MensRights13/11/25 11:50 AM
-18

Wait…do you not see the irony of your statement? You’re the one who brought up oppression? She’s just curious about a pattern she noticed. You’re on a Reddit about male oppression. Also you DEF wanna see women’s buttholes.
/r/MensRights12/11/25 01:56 PM
-16

Have you never had sex? Or at least not doggy? Cus you don’t just see it in your peripheral. Also your peripheral is not right in front of you. Now…you know there’s a such thing as anal porn right? Like folks like to do more than glance at women’s butt holes. You act like an interest in your partners butt hole is a weird, degrading fetish, not a natural consequence of sexual attraction or a want for intimacy. Also she having sex with them. They’ve given “access” to their body. If you go to a mus…
/r/MensRights12/11/25 01:53 PM
-7

I’m confused. What’s y’all’s problem here? Ive had a partner ask this. I’ve had multiple female partners want to hold my dick while I pee. You get weirdly curious and a sexual partner is an easy and safe way to explore that curiosity. Besides, the poster is just remarking on a pattern they’ve noticed. I’m assuming part of why they ask partners now is cus the ones in the past were so scared. I’m curious now too. Why wud you be so scared for a sexual partner to see your body? Lastly, “No means, No…
/r/MensRights12/11/25 01:27 PM
-48

What on earth are you talking about? She literally, unashamed, admitted to having multiple partners. Also what does that have to do with anything?
/r/MensRights12/11/25 01:18 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter