TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Flavius_Stilicho Archive

View 5 posts and 371 comments by Flavius_Stilicho on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

But, leftists also deserve credit for the creation and expansion of egalitarianism. Ergo feminism. Political equality is fine and dandy. "social" equality is a bunch of made-up nonsense.
/r/MensRights30/01/17 05:07 PM
1

Thought police. Thats all it is
/r/MensRights30/01/17 05:05 PM
8

Because she is selling her pussy to the highest bidder
/r/MensRights27/01/17 05:25 PM
2

Spelled "spelt" wrong
/r/MensRights27/01/17 01:00 AM
3

I guess we are not FUCKING white males.....
/r/MensRights25/01/17 03:02 PM
1

quality can’t be achieved by treating everyone equally." Ponder that
/r/MensRights24/01/17 08:35 PM
5

Because, despite their attack on "toxic masculinity", they still expect men to be strong and self-sufficient.
/r/MensRights23/01/17 11:28 PM
1

I have no problem with traditional gender roles or with the idea of men being masculine.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 11:58 PM
1

And the nonbreaching party is never entitled to damages.
/r/MensRights14/01/17 05:21 PM
6

Vagtalking
/r/MensRights13/01/17 02:25 PM
22

There is a legal difference between being intoxicated and being incapacitated due to alcohol such that you are incapable of giving consent. If you are not incapacitated (passed out or blacked out drunk) then you are responsible for your own actions while intoxicated. The difference is that the law says you can still form the requisite mental state to consent when you are intoxicated...even if your judgment (which led you to consent) is impaired.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 09:26 PM
11

endangers other peoples' lives So does drunken sex, when you later claim it was rape. I do think we should hold people accountable for their drunken bedroom escapades to some degree To "some" degree? There is a legal difference between being intoxicated and being incapacitated due to alcohol such that you are incapable of giving consent. If you are not incapacitated (passed out or blacked out drunk) then you are responsible for your own actions while intoxicated.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 09:25 PM
7

My first thought exactly.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 02:48 PM
10

People laugh about pc culture but the effects are real.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 04:48 PM
4

Not "Anti" either. I just want people to be accurate and not called a "fedora neckbeard" because I wear a trilby hat
/r/MensRights06/01/17 11:45 PM
4

I have both tribly's and fedoras, but am partial to English scali (driving) caps, which I was wearing back in the 90s, when you could get them only from goodwill.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 10:11 PM
5

pisses me off no one knows the distinction between a fedora and trilby hat.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 09:28 PM
1

Woah buddy. I am not "anti-christian." I have no high horse. But it well documented that the early christian church was violent and "converted" most of the roman world through violence, threats of violence or confiscation of property. I agree that the catholic monks in the "dark ages" kept the beacon of civilization going....but that does not make up for what the early Christians did. Hell, even St. Augustine wrote that violence was an acceptable means of conversion. And yes, the world WAS a vio…
/r/MensRights06/01/17 08:44 PM
1

Theodisius was a few after---after Constantine's son's had multiple civil wars and the goths destroyed the eastern army. Theodisius and the Bishop of Milan were ruthless in their persecution of paganism and Arianism.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 08:41 PM
1

I don't disagree with your notion that Nicene Christianity was a re-branded take on the cult of Sol Invictus with Christian iconography and lexicon. Constantine made Christianity the state religion but had issued an edict of toleration. Theodisius encouraged the violent suppression of paganism by said Christians.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 07:53 PM
3

I never understood the "problem" with gentrification. People are always bitching about improving and "revitalizing" the inner cities and bringing businesses back. Gentrification does that. Then they bitch the city isn't affordable and has lost its "character."--So, really, they want to keep inner cities crime ridden dilapidated ghettos.
/r/MensRights06/01/17 02:56 PM
1

I agree. I was repeating what is in the video The fact that an article or item of news includes one particular subset of men is no reason not to discuss it on a men's forum. Or are we only allowed to discuss news affecting men who are persons of color?
/r/MensRights05/01/17 10:03 PM
1

Give the recent level of vitriol against "straight white men", it is appropriate. The girl mocks the tortured boy for "crying like a little bitch"
/r/MensRights05/01/17 09:38 PM
1

Girls kidnapping a disabled boy and torturing him has nothing to do with mens rights?
/r/MensRights05/01/17 05:37 PM
7

Being seduced now = rape. Jesus. H. Tapdancing Christ. They really just want people not to have sex.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 03:37 PM
1

While not at all exhaustive, see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christian_persecution_of_paganism_under_Theodosius_I Also, read "The Closing of The Western Mind"
/r/MensRights05/01/17 02:53 PM
1

Yes, as a matter of fact i have studied early christian movements and their use of violence in late antiquity, particularly during the reign of Theodisius. I was raised catholic myself and have and respect a lot of deeply religious friends...but none of that changes the fact that the early christians were quite violent and shut down or destroyed pagan roman temples, aristotles philosphy schools, and what remained of the library of alexandria. St. Nicholas condoned many such acts.
/r/MensRights05/01/17 02:35 PM
2

Am adjunct. Have nephew in college as well.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 11:35 PM
4

Past participants shared this about their experience with the Men’s Project: “I realized vulnerability can be a choice you make actively. You can choose not to identify with certain types of masculinity and identify with parts you want to. I feel like when masculinity becomes a choice as opposed to something people are telling you to do, you live such a better life” UW’s Men’s Project begins with an off-campus overnight retreat on Saturday, October 3rd and follows with six weekly 2-hour on-campu…
/r/MensRights04/01/17 08:05 PM
6

If you want to assume the worst without reason Have you been on a state run college campus lately? I would be shocked if this is anything other than what I described.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 08:03 PM
10

How does that NOT sound like a lecture. I bet dollars to donuts that the class is nothing more than elaborate attempt to further feminize men and discredit, disparage, and modify behaviors to abolish traditional masculine qualities. It may be fully driven by men, may not. "Toxic masculinity" is just newspeak for man = bad.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 07:43 PM
9

Hardly. It sounds like a bunch of feminist profs lecturing men about "appropriate displays of masculinity."
/r/MensRights04/01/17 05:26 PM
7

Contrary to Hollywood "turn-the-other-cheek", martyrdom image, Christians have historically been quite comfortable with violence. My hobby is late roman history, so I am aware. The Book "The Closing of The Western Mind" is quite good describing both the physical violence and institutional pushback on "free thinking" that occurred. The parallels are obvious, only we are dealing with a secular "religion" this tine.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 04:38 PM
19

I just want to be left alone to raise my family in peace and not have the school system brainwash my kid into hating himself or thinking he is an attack helicopter.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 04:06 PM
23

It is really the internal destruction of western civilization. The SJWs are just as militant and ridiculous as the early christians. We are still in the "social pressure" phase, but soon enough expect violence to enforce conformity and "right thinking" to become mandatory.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 03:29 PM
3

It's like people don't know how to be adults anymore. Why would they? They have been coddled their entire life. They get a bad grade, mom calls the teacher. Get a disciplinary violation, dad's on the phone to their attorney. Complete lack of personal responsibility or any idea that actions have consequences.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 03:25 PM
83

Women telling men how to "properly" be a man. FLip the fucking script.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 03:13 PM
1

More "original sin" gibberish being handed down on high from the cathedral.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 03:51 PM
4

"crushing on" When did people stop writing English?
/r/MensRights03/01/17 03:17 PM
2

A few years ago I gave my new secretary a pretty good review, save for "does not meet expectations" as to "attitude" and "follows direction", noting that she is very defense and gets angry and argumentative when i point out errors instead of seeking to correct them. She proceeded to argue with me for 15 minutes about these remarks and insisted they were false and sexist. She then went to HR. I had recorded the entire conversation on my phone. Management wanted to fire her for insubordination. Bu…
/r/MensRights03/01/17 03:14 PM
2

Fuck them, because they are going to fuck you. Is the inarguable reality of our world. No shit man.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 03:10 PM
5

In the first round nearly all women flunked out due to hip and back issues from carrying the heavy 80+ lbd pack
/r/MensRights30/12/16 08:05 PM
4

SOME concerns?
/r/MensRights30/12/16 08:02 PM
1

She "fell pregnant"? WTF?
/r/MensRights30/12/16 04:56 PM
21

Again...why should i be responsible for someone else's "feelings"? Thats their business.
/r/MensRights30/12/16 04:43 PM
1

Maybe because men and women have a different sense of humour?
/r/MensRights29/12/16 07:21 PM
2

MALES: WHY CAN’T WE SYMPATHISE? Gender is not just an equality issue, but a diversity issue. Although differences are celebrated in every other field, in the social sciences, gender differences are denied or played down. We aren’t supposed to generalize about gender, because – in general – men and women are the same, supposedly. However as human beings, most people intuitively recognise that although men and women share many similarities, we are different in important ways. For example, as descr…
/r/MensRights29/12/16 06:44 PM
3

So, you are critical because of the expression on his face?
/r/MensRights29/12/16 02:55 AM
1

I mean the "myth" is that "if a girl initiates sex ("hooking up") a guy can assume she wants to have sex." What the fuck else are you supposed to "assume" when a girl pulls your dick out and starts sucking it?/......that she really wants to cuddle? Its like they believe actively engaging in a behavior doesn't constitute consent.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 02:00 AM
5

So he should have just run out of the classroom? What could he do about it at that point? He maintained calm in front of the school children, finished the story, and then dealt with the crisis.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 01:58 AM
6

Right, like its wrong to be proud of your country and want to protect its traditions and culture.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 01:06 AM
5

Are you seriously arguing that President Bush was personally aware of the 9/11 attack and just said "fuck it, I am going to read to some kids"? I am not a Bushie and opposed both of the recent wars, but come on!
/r/MensRights29/12/16 01:05 AM
1

If a girl initiates kissing or hooking up, she should not be surprised if a guy assumes she wants to have sex. Why is this unreasonable?
/r/MensRights28/12/16 04:07 PM
4

Amen
/r/MensRights27/12/16 05:43 PM
1

Well, obviously PONG is a metaphor for the patriarchy because two giant shafts are physically assaulting a vagina hole and passing it between them. You lose if you can't control it.
/r/MensRights23/12/16 05:11 PM
2

TL;DR: Shut the Fuck Up
/r/MensRights23/12/16 05:10 PM
2

awesome
/r/MensRights22/12/16 11:09 PM
2

Everything is oppression. You just have to point it out
/r/MensRights22/12/16 09:35 PM
6

Sad but true
/r/MensRights22/12/16 09:32 PM
1

As a matter of law they cannot consent, period, even if, in fact they purported to. Even ignoring the age issue, they were plied with alcohol and xanax, a combination which frequently causes people to black out.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 08:07 PM
11

They are not capable of forming the requisite mental thoughts to consent at their age. That is why we have statutory rape laws. Or, are you going to argue all those little boys that the priests plied with wine "consented"
/r/MensRights22/12/16 07:03 PM
12

According to cops, Byndloss and her codefendants “engaged in sexual acts” with the victims, who were 14, 13, and 12 at the time. Byndloss, investigators alleged, transported the minors to the home where they later drank vodka and gin, took Xanax, and had sex. “Everyone pretty much had sex with everyone,” the 13-year-old victim told police. The 12-year-old victim told cops, “Everyone was taking pictures and recording the sex acts with their cell phones.” How is that NOT rape!
/r/MensRights22/12/16 06:56 PM
3

$1000 she raises him as a gender/queer trans, LBTQXYRASGDF
/r/MensRights22/12/16 03:54 PM
1

Or, you take off your coat and roll up your sleeves and do it.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 10:17 PM
1

My wife can't understand why I would do it myself when we (she) paid for AAA. ---ongoing fight in our marriage. She seems to believe that people are incapable of doing things unless they have a degree, are certified, or are charging money as "professionals."
/r/MensRights19/12/16 10:10 PM
3

MYTHS???? HOW many confirmed cases of these do we need to see?
/r/MensRights19/12/16 10:08 PM
2

Right, it was an extra-legal remedy because the daughter was considered the property of the father and a pater familia could really "do no wrong" as to that which eh controlled.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 03:49 PM
2

A father literally could have his daughter killed for committing adultery.
/r/MensRights19/12/16 03:22 PM
1

low job being given on the 7th. week* FIFY
/r/MensRights14/12/16 04:24 PM
2

There is no more or less about it. THEY is fucking plural..end of story. It's more reasonable to adopt a colloquially used version of an already established word than to shoehorn one that's barely used by a fraction of the relevant population. No, whats more reasonable is to not have a language police that make up and mandate the use of words to pacify an extraordinarily small percentage of people.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 10:07 PM
1

It's often colloquially used as a singular neutral pronoun. But its grammatically incorrect.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 04:11 PM
2

If sex is the big factor if your relationship continues ..... Why women can't understand that this is true in MOST relationships.., or at least it is the "big factor" for men, is beyond me.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 03:41 PM
3

They will. Nice thing about federal civil rights laws is they have fee-shifting provisions. You get 1 or 2 high profile wins or settlements, and lawyers will be chomping at the bit.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 03:35 PM
2

Well, she's a dude, so........
/r/MensRights12/12/16 03:33 PM
1

Where is Hugh Mungos?
/r/MensRights09/12/16 11:13 PM
7

Being inquisitive; questioning authority; taking the initiative; creative problem solving are all looked down on. You must be still, silent, memorize, and repeat the approves answer or else go on drugs for ADHD.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 08:16 PM
1

Spot fucking on
/r/MensRights02/12/16 12:38 AM
2

What is "IDC"?
/r/MensRights01/12/16 07:45 PM
1

I know a gal who "loves to travel" and is always going on 2-3 week trips to Europe with her girlfriends while her husband is at home working. I kind of want to just tell the guy.......
/r/MensRights01/12/16 07:43 PM
2

Most girls who wont cheat will emphasize the fact that they have boyfriends, too. And you think that is because they are trying to avoid cheating???? I can't count how many girls/women have told me: "We aren't doing thing." or "I would totally never cheat" and then who later were all over me. Its called giving their fragile psyche's deniability. They didn't really "want to"; they were just "swept off their feet" in the moment. Anytime a woman friend says "I am not having sex with you"; she is th…
/r/MensRights01/12/16 07:41 PM
2

Its not paranoia if he's right, you d.b.
/r/MensRights01/12/16 07:37 PM
1

Could see where this was headed in the 90s, but no one dared admit this is what they wanted. While I was a social pariah for exposing libertarian views in college, I wasn thrown out on false rape charges and there were stillsome non pc profs in the hard sciences and econ.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 03:03 PM
1

You are a tool of the patriarchy trying to oppress this poor free spirit with your "traditional"--i.e. misogynist--views. If she cannot and does not wish to care for the child, she should be encouraged to have a post-term abortion performed.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 07:50 PM
3

I operate in the land of what is and how people actually act, not what they claim to be doing. Feminism stopped being about equality a long time ago.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 06:30 PM
1

Abandoning your kid and sending him away in order to play the field and party is an acceptable option now? Welcome to modern feminism, where every girl deserves to be a whore in a consequence free world.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 06:21 PM
2

I love how the definition of "hate" now includes: 1) disagreeing with x; 2) disliking x; 3) choosing not to associate with x; 4) having values and standards different from x---none of which require ill-will or a desire to do harm or malice. This is not just a problem with the gender war, but the broader progressive conflagration under which you either accept the values of those in power or be branded as some kind of "-ist" or "-phobe"
/r/MensRights27/10/16 06:10 PM
2

What the hell do intentions matter when the reality is what it is?
/r/MensRights27/10/16 06:07 PM
2

Me too, because i never claimed to speak for a whole gender.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 10:01 PM
3

everyone who rightfully thinks your a fucking asshole for judging their sex lives Having standards and a functional understanding of social history and the ability to perceive the consequences of unrestrained promiscuity does not make me an asshole. It makes me a realist and utilitarian.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 10:52 PM
3

You have a very interesting definition of "prude." Prude. a person who is or claims to be easily shocked by matters relating to sex or nudity. I am far from "shocked" by sexual matters. I do not think sex is "dirty" or "shameful"--which is the common, accepted meaning of prude. I'm judging you for shit talking people like me who make different sexual choices then you do. Fine, judge away. I have the same right to judge back. Societal standards relating to sex do not exist in a vacuum and are not…
/r/MensRights20/10/16 10:50 PM
1

Its funny you mention "controlling." No one is advocating making being a slut illegal. But by trying to remove all social stigma associated with such, you and your ilk are, in effect, "controlling" everyone else and forcing a paradigm of the secular humanist sex cult onto society. Go be a slut. No skin off my back. But don't expect or require me to condone or approve it or pretend it doesn't have adverse societal consequences
/r/MensRights20/10/16 10:43 PM
2

acting like a judgemental prude I am not a prude. I think sex is great and healthy in the confines of a committed relationship or the occasional one-night stand/hook-up. But, pretending that fucking everything in sight for 10+ years has no effect on a person's psyche or ability to pairbond is sticking your head in the sand. The fact that I do not glorify promiscuity and subscribe to the modern sex cult does not make me a "prude."
/r/MensRights20/10/16 10:40 PM
1

I am not acting "like I am better." I am exercising my freedom of association. sex positive I don't do SJW newspeak. s a huge dick move, one that sex positive MRAs like me will have to clean up after. You make no sense. It is everyone else that is stuck "cleaning up after" the thousands of failed marriages caused by unrestricted hypergammy.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 10:34 PM
2

Making preferences which exclude sluts illegal? Trying to overcome the innate revulsion most men have in marrying a slut. Its another way of coercing men to provide for them when they otherwise wouldn't. They want to, and have, made it socially acceptable to fuck everything in sight in their 20s and then expect a man in his 30s to give up 50+% of his salary to pay for her. They want to eat their cake (sex) and have it (virtue) as well. Its a means of reverse shaming men who are otherwise unattra…
/r/MensRights20/10/16 08:22 PM
2

Because a good deal of men don't want to marry used-up whores who are incapable of loyalty and pairbonding.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 08:18 PM
1

Right does not = ability. Right means the absence of a legal restriction preventing you from doing so.
/r/MensRights20/10/16 08:13 PM
1

I'd wipe my ass with it first
/r/MensRights17/10/16 02:20 PM
1

It is not simply about reading the material. It is about bring able to discus it in class and participate an exchange of ideas. Iagree with you as far as blind grading papers or finals. That is why participation grade is limited to 10%
/r/MensRights15/10/16 03:07 PM
1

As a former professor, I disagree. Students who come prepared to every class and participate in the discussion deserve a higher grade than those that dont do the homework and show up drunk/stoned and refuse to participate in the discussion
/r/MensRights14/10/16 02:59 PM
1

They will get him on something else. He is now on their undesireables list.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 02:58 PM
1

Your TDLR is inaccurate. See the post above yours.
/r/MensRights14/10/16 02:54 PM
5

Yeah, and how does one operating in an environment when 1/2 the women want consent forms pre-authorized in triplicate before you can speak to them and the other half want men to "man up" and grab em by the pussy?
/r/MensRights13/10/16 04:07 PM
10

Too accurate
/r/MensRights13/10/16 04:06 PM
5

In a relationship as a woman I am already doing so much work. Well, then, maybe, he is not the right girl for you princess? I am cleaning up his shit, I am buying clothes and makeup and spending hours looking good before dates, I am reminding him to use a napkin at the restaurant (apparently we are not teaching men this growing up????), telling him it’s his mom’s birthday, etc, etc, etc AD NAUSEUM trying to "fix" this creten and turn him into my idea of prince charming Have fun with that. That w…
/r/MensRights13/10/16 04:05 PM
0

Well, I would need to disagree with you on that given the number of random hookups I had in my youth that did not involve "getting to know" females....often just a look and a wink.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 07:38 PM
2

his behaviour isn't illegal now Really? Using a standardized pronoun should be a criminal act because some people have a mental disease and their brains dont match their parts?
/r/MensRights12/10/16 07:16 PM
-3

2016: The year making a pass at someone became sexual assault.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 07:08 PM
-1

So you always ask a girl permission to kiss her in advance?
/r/MensRights12/10/16 07:08 PM
0

If you feel that most people brag about sexual molestation Its not molestation if people do not object. He specifically said women "let him do it" because of his status.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 07:07 PM
4

the beauty industry Because making men more effeminate is just what we need. [edit: /s]
/r/MensRights12/10/16 07:04 PM
6

Frighteningly accurate
/r/MensRights12/10/16 05:09 PM
26

Jesus christ. Its not even parody anymore. The world is literally upside down. This shit is a religion and these investigation are witchhunts. Its the exact same type of people running these things and the same methodology..the only thing different is the ideology used to justify it.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 04:17 PM
2

That makes no sense. They dont take the time offered because it is not enough?
/r/MensRights12/10/16 04:14 PM
4

Men are "scared" because they don;t enjoy the pussy pass. If they take time off work for [whatever reason] and their projects/clients go bad, no one cares that they were on leave or WHY. Men are expected to get shit done and be responsible.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 02:18 PM
1

Your fail to recognize your inherent privilege. Anti-male comments are not on the same level as misogynistic comments because men have power. Just like only white folks can be racist, only men can be sexist. /s
/r/MensRights10/10/16 07:31 PM
1

But, but, but....UBI will save everything. Then we will all live in a happy world where we can all paint, play music and explore our creative side. /s
/r/MensRights10/10/16 07:29 PM
1

Justice should be tempered with mercy. Justice is not justice unless it is consistently and evenly applied without passion. No male teacher would get "mercy" under similar circumstances.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 02:23 PM
22

This guy CLs
/r/PussyPassDenied10/10/16 02:01 PM
1

I would say much more blatant in the last 3 yeas or so. I used to listen on my morning ride, as it is the only "pure news" on the radio....but, I just cant stand it anymore, esp. their "life/culture" pieces--i dont want to hear about about lesbian potmakers in botswana
/r/MensRights06/10/16 06:21 PM
2

No...they are totally in the bag for Hillary and are all-in on the SJW, radical feminist, secular humanist agenda.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 05:04 PM
8

"It's quite simple, really: if you are going to put on a production set in a particular place with a particular cultural context, then you need to reflect that with the ethnicity of actors," one student had complained, Thats funny. A local school district here just got sued for discrimination for not casting an african american girl as part of the german family in sound of music.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 06:15 PM
1

Maybe I just really like tits?
/r/MensRights03/10/16 09:12 PM
1

And your evidence that universities are using this "feminist definition" is...? See every university the in USA utilizing the expanded definition of "rape" under the pretense of Title IX compliance. This includes enforcing the "affirmative consent" doctrine which swaps the burden of proof, and agreeing that intoxication = rape and regret = rape. Perhaps the definition of rape in the UK is different, but in most states in the USA, rape is defined as some variation of "forcible sexual relations wi…
/r/MensRights01/10/16 01:11 AM
1

Legal definition does not = feminist definition My overall point was that you cannot rape someone "on accident" and therefore it is ridiculous to hold a class to "teach boys how to avoid raping someone"
/r/MensRights30/09/16 11:27 PM
3

At this point, you are simply being obstructionist and argumentative. The proposition is evident from the face of the text and is implicitly incorporated into the conclusions thereof.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 05:33 PM
3

She is citing to them as authorities.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 04:48 PM
6

RIGHT HERE: . Fourth, traditional ethics overrates culturally masculine traits like “independence, autonomy, intellect, will, wariness, hierarchy, domination, culture, transcendence, product, asceticism, war, and death,” while it underrates culturally feminine traits like “interdependence, community, connection, sharing, emotion, body, trust, absence of hierarchy, nature, immanence, process, joy, peace, and life.” Fifth, and finally, it favors “male” ways of moral reasoning that emphasize rules,…
/r/MensRights30/09/16 03:41 PM
1

but a woman struggling isn't a mens rights issue. It is when her male comrades would be dead because she couldn't clear a room in a timely fashion.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 03:13 PM
4

Did you read the linked article above? Its right there in black and white. Also, its a basic tenet of difference feminism. Liberal feminism aimed to make society and law gender-neutral, since it saw recognition of gender difference as a barrier to rights and participation within liberal democracy, while difference feminism held that gender-neutrality harmed women "whether by impelling them to imitate men, by depriving society of their distinctive contributions, or by letting them participate in …
/r/MensRights30/09/16 03:10 PM
5

As the brits say...Capital Idea, Brilliant.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 12:23 PM
3

And now "independence" and "intellect" are inherently masculine? My feminist grandmother is rolling in her grave!
/r/MensRights30/09/16 12:19 PM
7

You are talking in circles. Are you telling me that if ethicists generally classify intellect as a masculine trait, that it's not an issue of sexism unless them women actually do have less intellect? No FEMINISTS generally classify intellect /reason/logic/objectivity as a masculine trait. She is complaining that there are the default objectives because SHE BELIEVES they are inherently male. The implicit and false underlying assumption in this critique (which she will never admit) is that women a…
/r/MensRights30/09/16 12:17 PM
11

As the default sex, men perhaps have more difficulty understanding that their viewpoint is a viewpoint, and not objective reality. Feminists dispute that there IS an objective reality. Really, the point of this piece is that trying to be objective and rationale is inherently MALE and therefore bad. This article is simply a dressed up justification for the superiority of "women's intuition" over reason and logic.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 12:14 PM
3

If a "yes" can be revoked, why can't a "no" be as well?
/r/MensRights29/09/16 11:46 PM
5

I am sure that will be a thing. After all, they consider it "rape" to trying and "convince" someone to sleep with you (which, really, isn;t that the whole point of dating/courtship?). So, it would make sense that trying to persuade someone to agree with your viewpoint is "raping you views onto me."
/r/MensRights29/09/16 04:39 PM
3

Need to make it shorter, more crude: STOP THINKING WITH YOUR VAG STOP VAG THINKING STOP VAGSPLAINING
/r/MensRights29/09/16 03:20 PM
23

The aim of the classes was to make students aware of the definition of rape and how to avoid raping someone That right there is the problem. You cannot "rape" someone by accident. Rape requires an intent to violate someone against their will. Really, the term "rape" is almost as meaningless as "racist" right now, as it seems everything is rape.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 03:17 PM
2

Most reasonable people would interpret being asked by a girl to go back to her apartment, her providing wine, and then leading you into her room as an invitation for sex. The fact she regrets was she did in the morning is not the fault of the young man.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 08:19 PM
2

If you go to the doctor for a physical exam, you "consent" to having fingers shoved up your ass. You don't WANT to do it. You don't LIKE it. You feel BAD about it afterwards, but you CONSENTED to have a doctor put his fingers up your stinkhole. As a lawyer, I am very concerned with the shifting definition of consent.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 01:33 PM
2

Mansplainin cis-male shitlord
/r/MensRights22/09/16 10:20 PM
18

Feminists have blurred the distinction between DESIRE and CONSENT. People CONSENT to do all sorts of shit they don't WANT or DESIRE to do for a variety of reasons...to please another, to get an advantage, or due to peer pressure/etc. CONSENT without DESIRE does not equal rape.
/r/MensRights22/09/16 10:18 PM
3

Anyone got a translation?
/r/MensRights22/09/16 02:47 PM
3

She complains that her husband was a workaholic Probably the reason she divorced him. Can't seem to make the connection between all that work and the size of the alimony check though, amirite?
/r/MensRights19/09/16 02:05 PM
2

How is he to defend himself? They dont care. Fee fees must be validated/
/r/MensRights12/09/16 01:49 PM
1

We are fast approaching a culture in which almost all heterosexual sex is seen as rape. And that is the goal.
/r/MensRights12/09/16 01:43 PM
1

I don't expect her to say "no" in the slightest. Most women I mix with seem more modernised than that, so I've never experienced that behaviour. I am 40, and when I was dating, there was a lot of "she protests to much" going on. "Ok, i'll come in....but only for 1 drink" (right).
/r/MensRights07/09/16 03:43 PM
1

I would want a girl to stop if I said no - in fact, I have been in a position when she did not stop and it was very uncomfortable. I have been in a similar situation. The problem here is that you cannot objectively define "consent." A "no" can be said affirmatively, or coyishly with lustuous eyes. Someone can say "yes, ok" but not "really want it." A woman can say "we really shouldn't you know," but still engage in intercourse. My point is there are hundreds of verbal and non-verbal cues that ar…
/r/MensRights07/09/16 03:41 PM
1

Imo, while it may well be physical consent in a logical manner, it's still hard to decide whether the kissing is consent to kiss you, or whether you can go further. If she says no to sex and then kisses you, consent to have sex is not implicit. That is not what I am talking about. I am referring to a situation where she at first plays coy but then enthusiastically kisses you and proceeds to actively participate in further endeavors. Obviously, if she gives an assertive "stop, I don't want to do …
/r/MensRights07/09/16 03:38 PM
2

How about women lying that they are on the pill or that "you don;t need a condom." I didn't consent to the clap.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 01:49 PM
6

Right, so if a guy picks up a girl in a rented car with is only nice suit, and spends his entire week's earnings on the date, and then after sex, she finds out that she was in fact "slumming it"--that is rape? How about: "well, i wouldn't have had sex with you if I had known you just blew the entire football fraternity last weekend."
/r/MensRights07/09/16 01:48 PM
1

Yeah, I new what you were referring to. Most "white-collar" jobs are "salary-man" jobs, unless you are in sales or happen to be one of the top-dogs.---i.e., you are owned by your employer.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 01:45 PM
2

Exactly. The pre-emptory "no", but with a sly smirk and lustful eyes is a test to see if you really want her.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 01:33 PM
1

You are operating under the paradigm that sex is something women GIVE to men rather than something both individuals engage in. If she says "no" but continues to participate...actions speak louder than words.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 01:26 PM
1

And what is physical consent? If a girl says "no" and you kiss her enthusiastically, and she returns the kiss enthusiastically, then that is "physical consent." What pisses me off is we have been raised on movies of women saying "No James", and then giving in to their lustful passions. We expect women to say "no" at first to protect their virtue.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 01:24 PM
2

then there's no possible way to tell if someone got "raped" either. Yes there is..."listen and believe."
/r/MensRights07/09/16 01:20 PM
1

if a woman likes a man, she'll have sex with him eventually. if she doesnt, then why the fuck are they at a place together that they can have sex, ie someone's bedroom or in an apartment alone together? Thank you. As my grandmother said..."nothing is open at 2:00 a.m. except legs." This is were women need to take responsibility for their own actions. If you are at a party in college and a guy invites you into his room afterwards for an "after-party", what do you think is going to happen? If you …
/r/MensRights07/09/16 01:19 PM
1

I have relayed this before, but one of my best sexual experiences as a youngster was with a lifelong friend. After we were out drinking, we came back to my apt., and the heat was off. She scrawled in my bed, saying "we are definitely not having sex...I am just so cold. Well.....that "definitely not having sex" turned into definitely having sex in 10 minutes without any further verbal communications.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 01:15 PM
3

There's very little upside to being a salary man, but the cost hasn't changed. Working for someone else is for suckers....sadly that includes me.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 01:10 PM
2

they're going create the very rape culture that they falsely say exists Thats the point.....if everything is rape, then there is a "rape culture" that requires drastic changes in law and policy to be fought.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 01:09 PM
3

And how is obtaining verbal consent not communicating? So, now, Yes means No?
/r/MensRights07/09/16 01:08 PM
3

Thank you!
/r/MensRights07/09/16 01:07 PM
13

Why is anything even remotely sexual automatically equated with rape Because all sex is rape... ---silly cis-male shitlord
/r/MensRights07/09/16 01:04 PM
5

Maybe this will get women interested in playing with balls after work?
/r/MensRights07/09/16 01:02 PM
1

I don;t disagree. Each society has established norms and social constructs that we all operate under.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 03:31 PM
2

Interesting that (according to J. Caesar) ancient Celtic males actually shared wives within a family, with the offspring "belonging" to the first husband.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 02:40 PM
11

They act like it is the cucked husband's fault for "forming a bond" when he mis-believed he was the father. "Haha...you formed a bond....no out from child support for you!"
/r/MensRights02/09/16 02:37 PM
1

The scientific method incorporates masculine features such as the objectification of nature. Scientific knowledge is masculine in its neglect of women’s experience and its adoption of paradigms built on assumptions of competition and hierarchy. So, there is no objective truth and science is bad because it ignores fee fees?
/r/MensRights01/09/16 01:36 PM
3

They couldn't just leave it at "unconscious" could they. It will be interesting to see if defense attorneys can mount constitutional vagueness challenge to this law, as how is a person supposed to be able to tell if someone is intoxicated to the point of being unable to give consent legally when she consents, in fact
/r/MensRights01/09/16 01:35 PM
2

Well, we all have been the victim of one or two women who just wanted the free meal and drinks, but I think your comment is a over-generalization and not reflective of reality.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:48 PM
2

An attack helicopter ride.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 02:45 PM
1

Many attorneys will take these cases on a contingency fee basis due to the fee shifting under Title IX. My original statement was: Many attorneys will take these cases on a contingency fee basis due to the fee shifting under Title IX. I said nothing about "new developments."
/r/MensRights30/08/16 06:30 PM
2

You asked for my source supporting the assertion that Title IX includes fee shifting. I provided a citation to the statute that grants such authority. I don't know what more you want?
/r/MensRights30/08/16 05:55 PM
1

I agree. But reverse the roles and you would get roasted for trying to be "controlling" of a woman's spending.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 02:38 PM
3

Why is it, 100% of these chicks who explain "consent" always always ALWAYS act as if people are too stupid to understand what it means? Because you DON"T understand what it means--according to their crazy religion. This is why they want rape cases decided by specially educated indoctrinated judges rather than juries. Because people don't understand due to patriarchy. These are the same people who believe in "accidental rape."
/r/MensRights30/08/16 02:36 PM
5

Because we needed a term to express the ridiculous notion that your gender is not based on your chromosomes and that there is no "normal" or "default" anymore.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 02:32 PM
13

Can't even read. Literally: Born with a penis = evil and oppressive. We must atone for our original sin of being male.
/r/MensRights30/08/16 02:31 PM
1

Well, it "takes a village".....
/r/MensRights30/08/16 02:29 PM
1

42 U.S.C. sec. 1988: (b) Attorney’s fees In any action or proceeding to enforce a provision of sections 1981, 1981a, 1982, 1983, 1985, and 1986 of this title, title IX of Public Law 92–318 [20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.], the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 [42 U.S.C. 2000bb et seq.], the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 [42 U.S.C. 2000cc et seq.], title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.], or section 13981 of this title, the court, in its …
/r/MensRights30/08/16 02:21 PM
-1

Legitimately raped tttttTRIIGGGGeeeered.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 07:20 PM
7

Not a problem, because "listen and believe," all accused ARE guilty.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 07:19 PM
16

She has no money. What's the point in suing if she has zero money or assets? As my torts professor used to say: A million dollar judgment and $3.50 in cash will get you a bus ticket.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 07:17 PM
4

Many attorneys will take these cases on a contingency fee basis due to the fee shifting under Title IX.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 07:16 PM
2

Note the not-so-subtle subtext: You can be "raped" even if you "willingly gave it up" because you had a dissatisfying experience.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 02:20 PM
6

yep. or "upset".
/r/MensRights26/08/16 04:59 PM
5

Everything is about them and their fee fees. Not "ok, how can I improve and contribute" its "why do you have to be so MEAN"
/r/MensRights26/08/16 03:55 PM
34

We had a young intern over the summer who was "triggered" by criticism/correction of her writing (which was shit). How she will ever get a job is anyone's guess.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 02:23 PM
4

"I won't fuck you because 'we aren't 20 anymore', but if you get some somewhere else then you are a disgusting perv who 'can't keep it in his pants'" and, if you get caught strumming the ole banjo, then, well, you are a special kind of disgusting. --They really don't understand that sex is a bodily function to men.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 02:21 PM
2

There are times when a spanking IS justified. Its part of parenting. If you choose not to spank, fine, but I am not abusing my child for an occasional corrective swat. There is nothing wrong with it.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 01:40 PM
2

Yeah you're so evolved going from hitting a child with a weapon to doing so with your bare hands and really hitting someone over clothes, how petty are you? . . . . you're only doing it because you know you won't get punched in the face. Again, you speak as if I am doing it will some level of maliciousness. It is simply one tool on the corrective discipline ladder (verbal correction, time-outs, confined to room, toys taken away). It happens rarely, but there are times when it is needed. I am "on…
/r/MensRights26/08/16 01:29 PM
2

agree
/r/MensRights26/08/16 02:49 AM
2

I will try and simplify. US children are protected and coddled in their little perfect bubbles and protected by their helicopter parents. They then go away to college (university) with no self- control, self-respect, or ability to use judgment. The drinking age in the US is 21, so many students (jocks excluded) have not really "experimented with alcohol" until college. So, you have a bunch of sheltered, insecure kids, experiencing freedom for the first time, combined with an inability to hold th…
/r/MensRights25/08/16 09:33 PM
6

No, see, then problem is not that guys aren't flirting with her...its that attractive guys are not doing so. Notice how the exotic foreigner is given such high regard.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 09:22 PM
5

Not at all. I take no pleasure in spanking my son. I don't like to do it, and I don't do it out of anger or frustration. I do it for a specific purpose and only to get attention. 1 swat over clothes....unlike my father who loved to flog me bare assed with his belt and my mother with her wooden spoon and would literally hit me until all the anger was out of them.
/r/MensRights25/08/16 09:00 PM
5

There is nothing wrong with an occasional and deserved swat on a child's rear as a form of discipline or breaking a tantrum
/r/MensRights25/08/16 08:54 PM
1

CANT. EVEN. READ. "Where was this broad when I was 16"?
/r/MensRights24/08/16 03:50 PM
9

Blocked by paywall. Anyone have text?
/r/MensRights24/08/16 03:47 PM
1

Dr Buss said: "Affairs serve as a form of mate insurance, keeping a back-up mate should a switch become warranted in the future.’ "A regular mate may cheat, defect, die, or decline in mate value.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 11:17 PM
0

YEp, pretty much.
/r/MensRights22/08/16 06:44 PM
-1

To all the articles asking: "Where have all the good men gone" there needs to be the response: "Where have all the faithful women gone"?
/r/MensRights22/08/16 05:51 PM
1

Women cheat as insurance in case their man cheats or leaves them....ummmm, o.k. Giving that cheating is likely to result in the man leaving, that doesn't seem like a valid theory,
/r/MensRights22/08/16 05:26 PM
2

Men are walking ATMS
/r/MensRights19/08/16 02:40 PM
3

Not agreeing or disagreeing, except to point out "found innocence" is a misnomer. My point is what is stated.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 05:58 PM
2

The simple fact that someone was found innocent is not sufficient to claim a false accusation. Thats the rub. The court system does not FIND innocence. It just determines guilt. Not guilty does not = a determination of innocence by a jury as a matter of fact; it just means that the legal PRESUMPTION of innocence was not overcome.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 04:49 PM
3

These "ivy league" schools have dropped all pretense of providing a classical liberal arts education. It is pure social justice indoctrination now,
/r/MensRights17/08/16 02:18 PM
12

Same attitude as those who are critical of boys in school who report sexual assault by a female teacher: "He was getting lucky; why did he have to go and ruin good thing." --as if all men are supposed to be mindless pussy hunters and slay any piece they stumble upon. But, yet again, the womyns are entitled to sex when they want it; for men, thats "rape culture."
/r/MensRights17/08/16 02:06 PM
10

Free legal lesson for the day: Its a violation of ethical codes and the federal rules of evidence to delete documents if there is a "reasonable likelihood of litigation." However, if documents are destroyed pursuant to a routine document retention policy, there is no violation. Except, that once a party is on notice of threatened litigation, they must place a "litigation hold" and suspend any document retention policy.,
/r/MensRights17/08/16 02:03 PM
2

This whole thing look like another calculated attack on family units. Bingo
/r/MensRights16/08/16 03:03 PM
4

People called us crazy, and tin-foil hat reactionaries, but it will not be long before we see an organized push for pedos.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 03:02 PM
3

How does one obtain consent if they cannot a priori speak?
/r/MensRights16/08/16 02:05 PM
8

These cases are really infuriating. They remind me on an incident that happened in my HS. There was a new "hot" chemistry teacher our junior year; his first year teaching. Girls fawned over him. One girl in particular had the hots for him and would shamelessly flirt with him in class and wear inappropriate clothing. She went to see him for "extra help" after school. She propositioned him and he refused. But, she had been bragging to all of her friends about how she was going to sleep with the te…
/r/MensRights15/08/16 05:19 PM
36

Didn't you get the memo. Women can't do anything bad to men because of patriarchy. Thus, even when they objectify or oppress men it isn't oppression or objectification because "women lack institutional power" over men. Same warped logic that says racial minorities can't be racist.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 05:11 PM
2

Hey. I got my ass beat by my bully. But I landed a punch and put his head in a glass mirror first. He stopped bullying me not because I "won" the fight, but because I was no longer an easy target and knew I would fight back. Thankfully, I went to school during a time when we were allowed to handle things this way. This guy was a notorious bully and the incident happened in the gym locker room. The gym teachers saw it and reported that I was just defending myself (which I was). He got expelled fo…
/r/MensRights15/08/16 04:57 PM
3

So, the answer to whether you will be able to find a woman who treats you "as a human instead of a wallet" is basically no. Goldworthy
/r/MensRights15/08/16 03:54 PM
1

He is obviously there for status and prestige. By acknowledging he is supporting Trump, he has decreased his status and prestige, as it probably makes his wife look bad in her social circle.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 03:51 PM
1

Very happy I was in HS before Facebook. MySpace, and whatnot existed. Didn't even have email or cell phones until college.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 01:49 AM
1

How is this enforceable? How can it ever be proved where someone's eyes were focused?
/r/MensRights14/08/16 02:20 PM
3

If you are "weak" you will be bullied to death. This is not a matter of policy preference. It is a fact. I was bullied extensively in school until I had the courage to fight back and punch the bully who was extorting money from me and giving me atomic wedgies in the hallway.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 02:17 PM
7

Modern tyranny comes in the form of Delores Umbridge,
/r/MensRights12/08/16 09:02 PM
2

From a feminist point of view, a jury is twelve men and women respectively seeped in privilege and rape culture and suffering from internalized misogyny, so we can't have them making the decision. Aptly stated.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 09:01 PM
2

What they want is trial by a judge "trained"--i.e. indoctrinated--in modern regret=rape theory.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 09:00 PM
3

Whats not "fair" is refusing to teach boys in ways in which boys learn and by insisting they conform their behavior to feminine standards or else load em up with drugs until they do.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 08:45 PM
6

I do not understand the obsession with "verbalizing feelings." My feelings are my own. I do not WANT to share them and I am not interested in hearing about yours.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 02:30 PM
6

"To be good men, they were told, they must become reliable providers, emotionally stoic, logical, solution oriented, and aggressive.” Damn straight.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 02:28 PM
2

There is literally nothing you can do to "ensure" you wont be the victim of ANY crime. The world is not "safe." YOU are responsible for your own well-being. Not making dumb decisions reduces the risk of bad things, but shit still happens.
/r/MensRights11/08/16 01:56 PM
1

FUCK YOU I WON'T DO WHAT YOU TELL ME!
/r/MensRights11/08/16 01:47 PM
1

Its "dumb" when you are making an comparison for purposes of an ad hominen attack to end/avoid an argument. It is not numb if you are studying methodologies of persuasion of mass movements and not similarities of tactics and language employed.
/r/MensRights10/08/16 07:09 PM
2

Called "slumming it." Was the "victim" or "beneficiary" (depending on how you look at it) when I was a poor student working in a factory. Same reason the housewife will fuck the plumber and pool-boy, but wont co cavorting around with them in public.
/r/MensRights10/08/16 07:07 PM
1

Yes, this is just anecdotal and may be "confirmation bias," but I know several female attorneys who have low-earner husbands, some who work part-time, some who are "Mr. Mom"; they have zero respect for their husbands. Go out for a drink with them and all they do is bitch and moan how their husbands are lazy, don't work enough, and require her to "bring home the bacon." Several of these acquaintances are die hard feminists, so it is hilarious listening to this. Having met these husbands, they ten…
/r/MensRights10/08/16 07:03 PM
1

Women explaining why men do things = ok Men explaining anything to women = "mansplaining"
/r/MensRights10/08/16 06:55 PM
1

When we objectify men, their economic and professional power isn’t reduced or threatened,” Hah. Ok for us, but not for you!
/r/MensRights10/08/16 06:04 PM
3

As an attorney, this is very concerning. I can easily see a feminist filing a bar complaint based on an aggressive cross-examination of an alleged rape victim; or, a complaint being filed due to expressing an unpopular opinion during a CLE presentation or panel discussion (although this is less likely as most smart people with "controversial views" keep their mouths shut for fear of professional "shaming").
/r/MensRights10/08/16 04:28 PM
1

Well, duh.
/r/MensRights10/08/16 04:23 PM
1

Well, its a NEWS REPORT. They are supposed to be professionals and they are getting their jollies rubbing down a guy on national TV.
/r/MensRights10/08/16 03:47 PM
2

Most of those women may not have sexually attracted to Cosby, but the potential benefit of his favor at that point in his career would have been enough of an incentive for them to do the deed anyway. But workplace sexual harassment is now classified as rape. Didn't you get the memo?
/r/MensRights10/08/16 01:49 PM
1

Same attitude as the girls who walk around with shirts so low their nipples show..."Look at my books"/"My eyes are here"
/r/MensRights09/08/16 10:48 PM
2

And nary an instance of eye rape.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 10:23 PM
1

You are ignoring the increasing number of instances in which women report "rape" that they "feel" is rape--e.g., the present case---, but is not, in fact, a criminal offense.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 09:15 PM
2

We have been in an "Empire" since 1945
/r/TheRedPill09/08/16 07:55 PM
1

Curving, or anything objectively verifiable is a tool of the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 06:51 PM
3

And the takeaway from this is going to be ... 'We need to dumb down Calculus!' No, you just dont give tests or grades, because that makes the females "anxious" "self-conscious" and such practices simply reinforce the ever present toxic masculinity of the entrenched patriarchy. Girls must be allowed to demonstrate their emotional intelligence of math problems by writing essays describing how the questions makes them feel in relation to their victim-status.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 06:50 PM
2

Who would have thought that liberated, educated women would make life choices that are not the same as men? I guess that is more evidence of the patriarchy. Until these women learn to make the right feminist choices, oppression still exists.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 06:49 PM
1

What does a "happy marriage" mean according to this author? One in which there are no disputes? Such a marriage may be "happy", but it is certainly not "healthy." "Yes maming" your wife is a perfect recipe for financial ruin, self-loathing, and eventual divorce.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 05:20 PM
1

You can institute all the "policies" you want. Men will still be discriminated against for taking family leave.
/r/MensRights09/08/16 04:55 PM
-10

Sorry, being a man is not compatible with being a whiny-ass emo cry-baby.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 11:47 PM
1

To be a little more clear: If all you are doing is banging, then you are doing it wrong.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 11:30 PM
1

Interesting perspective. As a gen x'er, I am not sure I agree with you on all points. They use sex to their advantage. They always have. It is just that in previous generations there were social constraints that limited a woman's ability to do so, or provided consequences for doing so. Maybe they would see sex as men see it, instead of having their minds warped which leads to the modern day "rape crisis" where women's regret equals rape because they believe their sex is so valuable. It's not. It…
/r/MensRights02/08/16 11:21 PM
1

Already posted
/r/MensRights02/08/16 10:13 PM
7

You don't understand how the legal profession works. You work 60+ hours a week. Saturdays are usually mandatory. Last minute assignments are not uncommon at all. An unexpected issue comes up at trial; there is a new wrinkle in a closing, etc. or, the client calls on 5 pm friday and demands a contract by monday morning---all VERY typical things. A "good associate" is one who drops everything and says how high when the boss says jump.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 09:36 PM
9

This is what pisses me off. She flirts with him. Shows him sexy pictures, asks him to show her his chambers. What did she THINK was going to happen? If she didn't want to have sex or fool around with him, them she should have done any of those things. Don;t people have any common sense left. If you invite someone back to your place after a night of drinking, that is interpreted as a sign of sexual interest. (Not saying that it gives you the right to DEMAND sex). Sounds like the guy stopped when …
/r/MensRights02/08/16 09:34 PM
6

No. I need it at noon on Saturday so I can review it Saturday afternoon, and send a draft to the client before it is finalized and filed on Monday.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 09:25 PM
1

That's the end of the story. Supervisors don't really care about the specific hours you work, the number of hours you work, your gender, your haircut, your attitude; all they care about is whether or not your doing the work you were hired to do (and more broadly, whether or not you bring more value to the business than you cost). That is simply not true. Employers DO care about WHEN your work gets done. When the work gets done is often as important as HOW it gets done. And, many offices still ha…
/r/MensRights02/08/16 09:22 PM
11

the best way to tackle the wage gap is by implementing policies that make all hours equally valuable But all hours are not "equally valuable", particularly in a client-service industry. No, its not good enough that you get me the report at 7:00 pm, after you have attended to your children, I need it at 5:00pm to send to the client. Client wants it at 5, he gets it at 5. If you have more important things to do, thats your problem, not mine. Produce or get the fuck out.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 09:19 PM
5

are not at the office at key moments.......Goldin's argument is that, A is not necessarily a bad worker and that companies should try to reduce the influence working long hours has to career progression. But "good" or "bad" merely addresses "competence"--not ability to produce results WHEN THEY ARE NEEDED. The associate who can give me a motion when I ask for it at noon on Saturday is much more valuable to me then one who turns it in on Monday morning.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 09:17 PM
2

Hey, the teacher said it, so it must be true? I had this problem in my history civics class. The teacher would give us multiple choice questions, claiming there was only 1 "correct" answer, but there were always several possible "correct" answers because of unstated conditions in the questions themselves--usually things the teacher had not thought of...as in "well, 'c' would be correct if conditions a & B were present", but the teacher never even thought of A & B and would get pissed anytime I w…
/r/MensRights02/08/16 09:14 PM
3

I haven't met many adult women who are curious about the world This is why I didn't marry until I was 33. My wife was the first woman I met who I could discuss classical literature, enjoyed going to the theater or symphony and encouraged philosophical discussion, and was happy to attend free lectures/community classes with me. Nearly all the women I dated prior to her were content to watch friends, sex and the city, and go get their nails done.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 08:55 PM
1

This fits perfectly with my childhood experiences.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 08:52 PM
1

Boys need fathers. Boys and the ability to be "on their own" to figure things out themselves. Handing everything to them on a silver platter in a regimented fashion with instruction to regurgitate it is not interesting.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 08:51 PM
2

This rings so true. Its very sad that teachers are simply trained in "education theory." Most have little expertise or comprehension of the underlying subject matter (math excluded). I had a western civ teacher that knew nothing outside the textbook. Anytime I would ask questions she would tell me to stop being a "show off" and just memorize the answer in the book.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 08:49 PM
1

I don't have a justification for why women are backing off sex, Pretty simple: Despite the best efforts of 3rd wave feminism and pop culture to convince them that fucking randoms is the way to happiness, most women want emotional commitment from a man and are not satisfied or "empowered" by being a slutty tinderalla.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 08:39 PM
5

In law, your pay is tied directly to your ability to generate fees. When you are young, unless you are really connected, the only way to generate more fees is to bill more hours. Hence, if you chose to work fewer hours, you will generate fewer fees, and, in turn, be paid less.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 08:35 PM
3

longer hours don't necessarily mean more efficiency. No shit. But clients are still willing to pay me for my 11th hour of the day at the same rate as my first and would much rather pay for me than for me to bring on someone else to help.
/r/MensRights02/08/16 08:33 PM
11

Its SO UNFAIR! I mean, just because Joe works 3 times more hours than I do doesn't mean he should get paid more! Thats sexist! The firms fail to recognize the intangible and emotional intelligence resources that women bring to the table that cannot be quantified. And, so what that Joe will reliably be there at 6:30 everynight. Just because I have a social life doesn't mean I should be penalized. ---they literally think like this
/r/MensRights02/08/16 07:56 PM
2

No one cares about your feelings. Welcome to adulthood
/r/MensRights02/08/16 07:54 PM
15

"The gender gap in pay would be considerably reduced and might even vanish if firms did not have an incentive to disproportionately reward individuals who worked long hours and worked particular hours."
/r/MensRights02/08/16 07:50 PM
1

I think its bullshit and used by an excuse by people who never learned formal grammar. Grammar is used to establish a "common understanding."
/r/MensRights27/07/16 02:08 PM
1

You just became black for the jokes, right?
/r/MensRights27/07/16 02:06 PM
3

I have one of those as well. But, I find an ammo bag is nice for carying my wallet, phone, keys, and camera. I also have a "tactical utility bag"--marketed towards conceal/carry shooters, that is a little bigger and has ton's of compartments. This is great for when I am out with my 2-yr old and need to bring extra diapers, a changing pad and binks.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 09:19 PM
4

That is why you need to get a military surplus ammo or musette bag.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 04:46 PM
1

less likely? Who the hell shaves their pits other than swimmers?
/r/MensRights22/07/16 02:54 AM
10

Top Comment: Something that never seems to get mentioned is the fact that so many women just keep egging their partners on and on and on and on and on until they can't take the psychological abuse any more, lose their cool and snap ! Most men would rather go ten rounds with Mike Tyson than put up with the mental torment that their partners give them !! Now - I'm not suggesting it's ok to hit women but it's ALWAYS the male's fault and you never ever hear what happens before the incident ! If wome…
/r/MensRights22/07/16 02:47 AM
1

Hmmm: Married, getting sex. Just got mom flowers for her b-day Work 90+ hours a week. Black Yep, bored white guy that can't get laid and hates his mom!
/r/MensRights22/07/16 12:32 AM
1

You don't say......
/r/MensRights22/07/16 12:30 AM
1

...and those are bad things?
/r/MensRights21/07/16 04:52 PM
1

This happened to a college friend of mine. He found out when she was 3. The court ruled he has assumed responsibility and formed a bond with the child, so he could not contest paternity.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 04:47 PM
1

Well, she won't be getting hired. ....crying over red ink....really?
/r/MensRights21/07/16 04:27 PM
2

They are talking about "women only" public spaces on campus as "safe spaces", which implies that any space where men are allowed are "dangerous."
/r/MensRights21/07/16 04:23 PM
2

A few weeks ago, one of our summer interns claimed she was being "triggered" because I critiqued the piss poor writing assignment she turned in.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 04:02 PM
7

People need to get rid of the looney idea that anyone is entitled to a "safe space." Grow the fuck up.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 02:19 PM
5

Its simple. According to the feminists, the only thing that matters is what she claims to have said and what she FELT. There are making it de facto unlawful to challenge the credibility of the accuser, because we always have to "believe."
/r/MensRights20/07/16 03:41 PM
5

Sowell is one based mofo
/r/MensRights19/07/16 02:55 PM
3

I have become disillusioned by this subreddit. There seems to be a generational or philosophical divergence and the sub now seems to be populated by adolescents or young adults who buy into/operate under a feminist/pc worldview even while purportedly opposing the anti-male feminist agenda. Instead of pushing back against the ideological basis for the modern suppression of everything male, many here seem to operate under a feminist "special snowflake" syndrome and simply want the same benefits/pr…
/r/MensRights19/07/16 02:35 PM
1

Don't know what you mean by "internet lawyer." If you are questioning my veracity, I can assure you I have been practicing law for 15 years and have spent time as a prosecutor, defense attorney, and now civil litigation attorney. I do not subscribe to your utilitarian concept of morality.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 01:44 PM
2

Many things that are morally wrong are legal. Many things that are illegal are not morally wrong.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 11:16 PM
3

You are mixing logical cause, moral culpability, and legal responsibility. And, as an attorney, I can tell you that the law has jack all to do with right and wrong. It is merely the tools by which we maintain the current societal order.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 11:14 PM
2

Do you feel it acceptable that adults can blame their choices and behaviors on external triggers as you suggest? I do not. Feelings and subjective notions of "agency" are irrelevant. If I walk around Harlem with a sign saying "I hate n!ggers", I am going to be assaulted. Doesn't make it morally right, but i nonetheless am partially "at fault." Same as if a lady wears a low cut blouse showing her ample cleavage and then castigates me for looking at what she put in plain sight. Right and wrong hav…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 10:18 PM
1

I don't think you understand what responsible means! He is using "responsible" in a epistemological or logical sense, not a moral one. You are "responsible" for something if your behavior was a but-for cause of the event. I.e. "The accident would not have happened but-for my decision to take this route."
/r/MensRights18/07/16 10:15 PM
-1

Here is the elephant in the room. In the absence of some form of incapacitation or physical coercion, no prosecutor will ever be able to convince a jury that what OP described was done "without consent," as, despite his verbal protestations, he acquiesced to the physical act. 9/10 jurors would conclude that, in the end, he agreed to it, because if he had not, he could have physically stopped it from happening.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 08:56 PM
-3

If she is on top of him and physically holding him down, then yes a crime has occurred. Your mugging example is imminently distinguishable due to the presence of a deadly weapon and use or threat of use of force. Your example would be more apt if someone walked up to you on the street and simply said "give me your wallet" in a non-threatening manner. If there was no threat, use of force, or display of force, no prosecutor would charge that.
/r/MensRights18/07/16 06:50 PM
-4

Yes, females can rape. But, this poster did not indicate he was in any way incapacitated, disabled, or physically coerced. He was in his parent's house. He could have gotten up and walk away. Ultimately, I read OP's story as one of someone being pressured to do something they didn't want to do, but they went ahead with it anyways. That is not rape. Characterizing it as such gives power to the regret = rape individuals or those who claim they were "too scared" to take responsibility for their own…
/r/MensRights18/07/16 03:47 PM
1

Well, in many places "massage therapists" are not permitted to touch genitals or perform any acts that entire sexual gratification.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 04:01 PM
2

Hey....read the entire thread: I wasn't aware rub and tugs were legal in the UK The stigma of a man going to one is not the same as a woman.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 04:00 PM
3

Wasn't aware they were legal
/r/MensRights15/07/16 02:00 AM
9

Yeah, and not a good idea to inquire if one "fancies a fag."
/r/MensRights14/07/16 08:14 PM
6

Over here, we call that her cooter. Fanny is an ass.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 08:10 PM
8

Good to know. Is that masseuse classified then as a sex worker or massage therapist?
/r/MensRights14/07/16 06:58 PM
21

How is this not prostitution?
/r/MensRights14/07/16 05:44 PM
1

You can change pitch, but you will still have the end-of-sentence inflection, numerous "likes", use of "I just feel", and other tell-tale signs of the millennial female
/r/MensRights14/07/16 01:08 PM
1

I am not making it a race thing. I am making fun of her for making it a race thing.
/r/MensRights02/07/16 01:28 AM
5

Picture screams penis envy.
/r/MensRights01/07/16 09:27 PM
1

I am so tired of this cunny. She texted the guy that she wanted him to fuck her in the ass and then when he did, its rape? What the actual Fuck?
/r/MensRights01/07/16 02:41 PM
8

I am so confused. She claims to be a "woman of color." But, I thought Asians weren't oppressed minorities because you know, they follow cultural norms and get good grades.
/r/MensRights01/07/16 02:38 PM
1

as I have said, there's a difference between somebody consenting to sex and having drugs while doing it and somebody slipping it into their drink without their knowledge. On that, we can agree.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 07:53 PM
2

Seeing as I believe in free will/choice, it is hard for me to understand. Adults should voluntarily be able to consume whatever substances they want, but should be held responsible for their own actions. I am not talking about someone blacked out, unmoving. I am talking about the relatively common occurrence of of partying it up and using drugs and alcohol to throw off inhibitions. The fact someone takes drugs to have a good time does not mean they are incapable of consenting to have sex.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 07:50 PM
3

I don't know about you, but I have not seen any testimony in the federal case, nor has there been a conviction. I am not just going to assume he is guilty because of an echo chamber
/r/MensRights24/06/16 07:45 PM
3

Why is it a "grey" area. If they are not legally incapacitated, intoxication does not negate consent.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 07:44 PM
5

Though if they're taking the drugs willingly and don't mind having sex that's a grey area. Isn't that a normal Saturday evening in college....it was, as far as I can remember.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 07:42 PM
1

I go back to the Chris Rock standup routine where he compares single parenthood to driving a car with your feet. Sure, you can do it; that doesn't make it a good idea.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 02:25 PM
5

I'm not going into another fucking English 101 class . . . having to write a paper about the plight of Guatemalan feminist banana farmers in the Sixties under the Dole Banana Regeim Would be funny if it were a joke; sadly, it is not.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 03:10 PM
1

the answer of course is: depends how she feels about it the next day. Ding ding ding ding
/r/MensRights20/06/16 07:13 PM
2

In a free society not subject to religious codes of conduct, anything that is legal is "ok." You subject beliefs as to "ok" are just t hat--your subjective beliefs. You have no right to enforce your view of what is "ok" on other people.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 11:07 PM
3

Because you seem to believe that some paranoid teenager's subjective viewpoints about what is "creepy" should dictate my ability to act in a free society.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 10:49 PM
3

Whole point is men should not be accused of engaging in criminal behavior for engaging in conduct that it perfectly legal and that has a legitimate reason, irrespective of the fee-fees of the person who is "offended."
/r/MensRights17/06/16 10:39 PM
3

If you want to argue for the sake of arguing that's fine, but if you dont think cheating is bad the law doesn't forbid it then that's all I need to know. I never said that or agreed to it. "Cheating" is different in that you have made a promise to the other person to do not so. I have made no promise not to photograph anyone in public.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 10:34 PM
10

but that one fact alone doesn't make her a hypocrite. Actually it does; she engaged in the exact same behavior she was condemning. but it's kind of like how punching someone is illegal, but defending yourself from assault with a punch is legal. False equivalency. Even IF he was filming her, he was not harming her. She did not act in "defense" of anything. She acted out of vengeance and retribution to publicly shame him. If you insist on the assault analogy, it is as if she sidestepped a punch an…
/r/MensRights17/06/16 10:06 PM
7

doesn't automatically make it ok "Ok" according to whom? Is there some SJW, do-gooder board I need to check with before engaging in legal behavior that someone, somewhere may not think is "ok"? Besides, I though social conventions were just tools of the elite patriarchy to control other people? /s What ever happened to "do your own thing man?; Be a rebel; against all authority", etc., etc.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 09:52 PM
10

Oh, so its okay to lump people into groups based on preconceived notions and then have separate standards of behavior and expectations for said groups? How about people not make assumptions about other people, treat other people as individuals, and if you are that concerned ask the person to stop doing what you find "creepy."
/r/MensRights17/06/16 09:48 PM
5

Example: I find the religious nuts who stand on the corner outside my office every morning trying to hand out their literature to be assholes/douches, etc. To someone of their religion, they are doing gods work and should be lauded. Your own personal opinions on what is "proper" does not equate to some form of objective social more.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 09:44 PM
2

IOW: My opinion on social etiquette and behavior are absolutely correct and anyone with a different opinion is a [insert derogatory name here]
/r/MensRights17/06/16 09:41 PM
12

Hell, I find the half the people walking around on the college campus in my town to be "creepy" = barely any clothes, face piercings galore, tat sleeves, colored hair----that doesn't give me the right to publically shame them or call the cops.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 09:39 PM
18

Same type of argumentation used by SJWs all the time: "What do you mean you are against [x policy]?; how bad do you want [y group] to be oppressed." "What do you mean you think you should have due process before a campus tribunal; how badly do you want to rape coeds"? [Edit: don't know why there is a downvote on this. This is the precise form of sophistry used by SJWs: Make false equivalency, followed by a non-sequitur that implicitly accusers the other some verbotten viewpoint/behavior to discr…
/r/MensRights17/06/16 09:37 PM
12

How do you not get this. I film my son in the park, at swimming pools. Often other kids are in the frame; or I will see a particularly compelling moment will another child in the foreground and shoot. That is not illegal. Its called an artistic hobby. No different than if I were painting on the beach and included the sunbathers I saw in my expression. I film all kinds of things in public: Ice cream man giving cone to kid on a hot day; kids at the park with balloons; people on the beach; a couple…
/r/MensRights17/06/16 09:28 PM
7

When did I ever define "ok"? I don't even know what that means. I deal with rude assholes all day. The world is filled with them. That doesn't give me the right to call the cops and ruin their lives because I took offense at something they did. Besides, you are missing the point: A man should not be labelled a "creep" for engaging in legal behavior based on another person's unfounded, paranoid assumptions for the motivations behind the behavior. Personally, I have had the cops called on my for p…
/r/MensRights17/06/16 09:21 PM
22

Ironic that she took a picture of the guy without his consent to publicly accuse him of being a pervert for taking a picture of her without her consent.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 09:16 PM
28

But the girls dont know that!...and THAT is the point. Girls are training to think any man with a camera MUST be a creepy that is filming them, when there is almost always a "non-creepy" explanation.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 09:15 PM
6

How do you know someone is filming YOU specifically?
/r/MensRights17/06/16 09:14 PM
5

Should be top comment. Very Succinct.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 09:11 PM
16

So, if I am filing my nephew playing at the splash pad and there are girls running nearby, that makes me a "creep"? I have to ask every patron there for permission? I think not.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 09:10 PM
2

Yes
/r/MensRights17/06/16 09:09 PM
1

YES
/r/MensRights17/06/16 09:09 PM
31

I can do it for whatever reason I want. Maybe I am on vacation filming an interesting building or sunset. Maybe I am doing a film project for school. Maybe I am just testing out my phone. The law is clear, a person has no reasonable expectation of privacy on a public street/public venue. can be considered creep Which is the whole fucking problem. Recording the public is not "creepy"; it is part of our first amendment rights.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 09:08 PM
27

Just because it isn't illegal, doesn't mean it's okay for you to do. Actually, yes it does. If something is not illegal you are free to do it. We live in a free country after all. if its old man > young girl, creepy Except that young girls incorrectly assume that anytime a man has a camera/phone pointed in their general direction they must be filming or "creeping". There have been a number of stories where some dude is just holding up his phone to read or is taking a picture of something nearby.…
/r/MensRights17/06/16 08:56 PM
21

""Teenage girl posts photo on Facebook of man she thought was looking at her." It is not illegal to take video or photos of people in public. People like you are why I had the cops called on me for shooting my son in the park.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 08:28 PM
3

Its really amazing. The modern day western woman acts like carbon-copy of Elaine from Seinfield---dating someone new every other week throughout her 20s and 30s, dumping them for trivial reasons or moving on to "greener pastures"--and then wakes up at age 40 and realizes that she is no longer attractive to the men she wants to date and that most of the guys she dated and rejected are now married to younger women.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 03:11 PM
34

Not to be confused with section 4.2 sub (b), "raping you with his eyes."
/r/MensRights17/06/16 02:56 PM
8

Well, maybe thats because there is no "Mr. Right" or "Ms. Right." There is: "Mr./Ms. who I like and am combatable with and for whom I am willing to overlook their imperfections in exchange for emotional support, stability, family, and social standing." Girls need to be told there are no "prince charmings" and to stop building up their lists of 550 qualifications a man needs to be considered "worthy" of marriage. It used to be that if you weren't downright ugly, had a decent job, were pleasant, a…
/r/MensRights17/06/16 02:21 PM
35

No.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 02:17 PM
93

So what would guilty be? He was "creepy"
/r/MensRights17/06/16 02:16 PM
5

I do not understand how feminists can overcome the cognitive dissonance between: Marriage is an evil tool of the patriarchy that oppresses women. Young men are just using women as sex objects because they have no intent of "manning up" and marrying them. Once marriage has indeed dwindled to a point where females can no longer use divorce judgments to transfer a man's wealth, I wonder what ingenuous system they will come up with to do so? I know, because of the historic patriarchy and lower earni…
/r/MensRights10/06/16 07:11 PM
2

All of this is truth
/r/MensRights10/06/16 07:08 PM
3

Its "divined" because there is no way to read Title IX and conclude these regulations are required to implement it. This is the Dept. of Ed. literally making up laws with no congressional authorization. I suspect a great many of these will be thrown out on due process grounds, esp. the one about punishment before a finding of guilt and not allowing an exonerated student back on campus.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 06:55 PM
14

A good lawyer knows the law; A great lawyer knows the judges. Ain't that the truth.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 06:46 PM
1

No. That sounds like a horny drunk guy going into his room with an ugly and all his friends banging on the door saying "don't do it man"
/r/MensRights02/06/16 07:00 PM
1

That is because it is two separate, but related ideas crammed together. Hence the reason the author should have employed the semi-colon.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 06:26 PM
7

But, “if the victim truly believed it to be nonconsensual [sex],” Bruno said, “then expelling her was the right decision. All about the victim's subjective beliefs.
/r/MensRights01/06/16 03:43 PM
3

I thought it was used to mean "players"
/r/MensRights27/05/16 09:06 PM
1

Not rare at all. Common divorce situation when a man works and there are kids involved. Man needs to work hard to provide for wife and kids. Wife gets upset man is working so much. Wife cheats, blames husband. Divorce ensures. Wife takes kids, abhorrent maintenance payments, and leaves dad estranged from his kids living in a 1 bedroom apartment drinking and contemplating suicide. Seen it with more than a few friends.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 09:04 PM
2

he rate is per married couples; the marriage rate may be going down but they're still measuring the rate by examining the same number of married people. At least that's how I understand it to work. Yes, the rate is much lower if you look at both first marriages; it is lower even still for first marriages of college educated adults.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 09:02 PM
2

You're essentially using the same logic, but in reverse. I see you have successfully identified a millennial MRA.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 09:01 PM
3

A divorce should just be the separation of two people once joined. It should not result in the destruction or diminishing of one or the other of the two. Agree. There should be a presumption of 50/50 child placement; 50/50 marital asset split, and no maintenance unless the non-working spouse can demonstrate reasonable attempts to look for employment, and only then for a reasonable period needed to retrain.
/r/MensRights27/05/16 09:00 PM
6

Where is there racism?
/r/MensRights27/05/16 08:57 PM
4

Women now REPORT cheating more than men. I would venture to guess actual percentages have not changed...just those willing to admit it because "yay, female empowerment"
/r/TheRedPill27/05/16 04:43 PM
-6

The guy in this cartoon is married to a bitch woman and that's the main thing. FIFY
/r/MensRights27/05/16 03:46 PM
3

DONT GO TO LAW SCHOOL Even if you can find a job, the profession sucks. You will become a divorced, depressed, alcoholic.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 09:36 PM
2

The solution I have favored since the late 90s is that when using an indefinite personal pronoun, the sex of the author should be used.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/16 09:31 PM
8

Right. The only evidence that matters is what she says. Everything else is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 09:53 PM
3

Funny. I was at the salon last night getting my son's haircut. The women in the chair next to him was complaining very loudly to her stylist about her husband....loud enough for the whole room to hear. Her list of "complaints": He is great at supporting us financially, but is always working and never home (perhaps that is because one must work to support a family) He is so "controlling" because he makes her pick up her clothes and hang her coat in the closet. She can't just throw clothing on the…
/r/MensRights19/05/16 02:14 PM
3

He's an ex-cop. Sounds like he pissed someone off in local law enforcement who framed him.
/r/MensRights16/05/16 11:33 PM
1

I get that, but how to they trace it to her? What is the significance of her refusing to "open the profile" ?
/r/MensRights16/05/16 10:29 PM
1

How could should she send messages back and forth from her account if she was sending them through a dummy account? I guess I do not understand how they connected her to the dummy account.
/r/MensRights16/05/16 05:10 PM
2

Next move to expand the rape shield laws to prohibit questioning the alleged victim about pre and post-coitus activities.
/r/MensRights16/05/16 05:03 PM
1

So, really, this presumes all sex is rape unless you can prove otherwise.
/r/MensRights16/05/16 05:03 PM
2

Well...was the MILF mother the mastermind behind this operation? The laptop is then taken from my sons hands, passed back to Carly and she is then asked to load up the profile of the person sending the messages. The person sending the messages had the same name and profile picture of my son. Carly then said no, the principal then asked why she wouldn't and then Carly yelled out, "I won't, I do not want to!". Can someone explain this?
/r/MensRights16/05/16 04:55 PM
7

I call out the rape cake analogy. M: you want some chocolate cake W: No, I am on a diet, it will make me fat and feel bad about myself M: But, its double fudge chocolate with frosting and rum cream. Everyone else had it and loved it. W: I better not..... M: Come on..just try a little bite W: Well, I don;t really want to, but ok....but dont tell anyone else I had some = RAPECAKE
/r/MensRights12/05/16 03:28 PM
2

Thanks. I would just call that being a traditionalist.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 07:27 PM
4

WTF is a "demi-sexual"?
/r/MensRights11/05/16 06:54 PM
7

Because that would be discriminatory. See, we need to be inclusive and allow women into men's spaces. But, we also need to remove "toxic masculinity" from said spaces. No need to segregate when you force men to act like women.
/r/MensRights09/05/16 04:16 PM
1

Recantations don't have a lot of value in court Because "credibility" is a jury issue. By having the witness come back and say "I was lying", the court would be overturning a finding of credibility made by the jury.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 08:20 PM
9

Nice thing here is the fact that the school did not punish her when she admitted to engaging in patty fingers. Clear case of discrimination in enforcement of the standards.
/r/MensRights03/05/16 08:16 PM
8

Well, seeing as womyn can't be rapists.....
/r/MensRights02/05/16 08:17 PM
13

Putting women in charge of local zoning boards results in cookie cutter neighborhoods, three to four levels of aesthetic review committees for any improvements, and Delores Umbridge-like enforcement of infractions as simply as not keeping your blinds drawn. The women on these committees are what our mothers used to call "busy-bodies"; their life goal is to control how others live.
/r/MensRights02/05/16 02:47 PM
10

I would say most modern western women view hetero marriages in this fashion
/r/MensRights02/05/16 02:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter