TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FloranHunter Archive

View 0 posts and 1,351 comments by FloranHunter on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,351 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Thanks! Somehow I hadn't heard anything about this. None was presented. It's from a source, sources who fear for their safety, bla bla bla, the exact same stuff you see here in the Feminist/MRA community. Hahaha. I'm glad I still get a kick out of SJW projection.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 11:33 PM
2

This shit isn't even passive aggression, it's outright aggression. It's just also immensely deceptive and variously not-straight-forward.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 05:43 AM
1

Fuck man that comment needs to be a post. That's the most machiavellian shit. Way the fuck worse than sleeping around for material and social benefit - that's uncommon but straight-forward. Using several modes of attack to destroy competition like that requires someone to be cold. I wouldn't be surprised if she's an actual sociopath.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 05:39 AM
2

On the back: Department of Redundancy Department
/r/MensRights21/08/14 05:31 AM
1

Do you feel shame that you speak in public when you cannot differentiate between celebration and grim expectation?
/r/MensRights21/08/14 05:30 AM
1

More of a motte & bailey.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 05:27 AM
1

How much influence do they have? I never hear them given any credence. With feminism and the zionists, there's a lot of backlash against even mild criticism by anyone that matters and memetic attacks all the fuck over even against people that don't matter.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 05:26 AM
1

Hell they've even invaded the Tabletop (Pen & Paper RPG) community with their SJW nonsense. Care to elaborate?
/r/MensRights21/08/14 05:25 AM
1

The amazing thing about feminist-enforced censorship is that not only must it eventually produce a massive backlash but that the MRM is going to ride that backlash into the mainstream. We're one of the very few (only?) progressive movements outright refusing to offer fealty to the feminist movement's dominant narratives.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 05:23 AM
1

Fully General Counterargument Putting vaker's level of self-awareness at roughly feminist levels.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 01:13 AM
4

Does it bother you at all that you jump to purely political speech when you could instead try to actually understand how people fail to think usefully?
/r/TheRedPill20/08/14 07:49 AM
1

The RP thing is to face up to the fact that there isn't enough food so someone must go hungry. The BP thing is to avoid thinking about the impending starvation until it's upon you and yours. How you face reality is largely unrelated to TRP so long as you don't fall into any other pleasant delusions like favoring women more than they're worth*, trusting others to be more altruistic than you should, etc. * This applies to all classifications of people, including oneself, but I cover the most commo…
/r/TheRedPill20/08/14 04:50 AM
2

Ben Franklin effect A person who has done or completed a favor for someone is more likely to do another favor for that person than they would be if they had received a favor from that person. Similarly, one who harms another is more willing to harm them again than the victim is to retaliate. AKA the more the neurotypical seek empathic connection with a psychopath, the more they seek the empathic connection with a psychopath. This may be the least of the factors with a noticeable effect but it's …
/r/TheRedPill20/08/14 04:39 AM
5

I'm not sure if your standards for women are higher than mine or my standards of hygiene are higher than yours.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/14 06:32 AM
1

From a very brief look at her game, all she needs to know to make that is is fucking html. Which isn't a programming language and has IDEs that greatly simplify its development.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/14 06:30 AM
3

I'd prefer students started with C. It is less immediately fun. Beginners aren't going to be writing games on day 1. However it does teach what the computer is actually doing and doesn't force you to simultaneously learn higher level concepts like object oriented programming. I strongly prefer python as a beginner language. The first steps are to learn how to think like a programmer. The concepts you learn learning C are necessary but superfluous at the stage where e.g. the notion of linear prog…
/r/MensRights19/08/14 06:22 AM
1

Professor, but this use of recursion is inherently less memory-friendly than a simple for loop But if it's set up for tail-call recursion then it's compiled to be identical to a for loop... and if I'm not mistaken, all for loops can be turned into tail-call recursive functions. This has been an example.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 06:04 AM
1

Well they definitely should teach in python over java for introductory courses because the number of things you need to ignore to get started with java is much more numerous than with python. The syntax of python is also more intuitive for those well-versed in natural language.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 05:58 AM
1

Perhaps the tap will be bladed.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 05:55 AM
1

She responded to you after saying she was done. You controlled that conversation.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 05:53 AM
2

Empathy meaning they'd be forced to feel as others do. That's crap for anyone that needs to fire others. Much better is to coolly understand others such that you can make them move to your design.
/r/TRPOffTopic17/08/14 06:28 AM
1

If it's honest then it's at best describing what he wish he wife had done.
/r/TheRedPill14/08/14 03:07 AM
2

That percentage is useless without the rate for male engineers. I know it's lower but still.
/r/TheRedPill13/08/14 07:19 AM
1

The incentives are there.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 05:16 AM
6

Yeah doesn't change my stance. When yours is the unestablished opinion, you suppose free speech because it protects you and your agenda. This is the situation of feminists in the past. Today feminism is the established opinion and all criticism of feminism is unestablished. Predictably, feminists are against free speech.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 04:40 AM
7

Probably not "always". I suspect feminists become anti-free speech as soon as free speech started protecting their detractors instead of them.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 04:29 AM
1

No, guys can get away with a bit by acting stupid. People don't look on you with any kind of favor from it but it will the I'm-so-clever asshole off your back.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/14 05:44 AM
3

Come on now. You tried to signal your superior intellect and failed. Rally and try again later.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/14 05:43 AM
1

ma·nip·u·late məˈnipyəˌlāt/Submit verb 2. control or influence (a person or situation) cleverly, unfairly, or unscrupulously. "the masses were deceived and manipulated by a tiny group" synonyms: control, influence, use/turn to one's advantage, exploit, maneuver, engineer, steer, direct, gerrymander; More Emphasis mine. source: google See also: this.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/14 04:31 AM
-2

No, he's right. The law is saner than feminists in this case.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 12:30 AM
11

I highly doubt that nuclear families are particular important. More like, nuclear families are the smallest familial units that still raise children well. Extended families are more normal for humans and seemed to have done well for our entire history up until the early- to -mid-1900s.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 11:55 PM
19

A primer would be a good resource to direct people since "read the sidebar" rarely works. It would also provide newbies a place to skim to get back on track.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 11:47 PM
3

Oh, and she said it's a lot of fun to act dumb because you can pretty much get away with doing/saying anything because people just assume you're ignorant. Obviously not to the same extent but this works as a guy too.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 11:29 PM
2

Of course they do. Most people love to follow a strong leader. There's almost nothing non-manipulative about leadership. What people dislike is feeling powerless and feeling like a fool.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 11:27 PM
2

Well, that and the strawman they generate when they read what's here. Throwing those people off is part of why we use crass language here.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 11:25 PM
8

I wish they'd do that in America.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 06:12 PM
3

What actually happens is being see "relationship trouble" and pattern-match it to "couples counseling". No original thought actually takes place - that already happened by the people that started promoting couples therapy in the first place.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 07:27 AM
5

Your misspelling makes this some dark humor!
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 07:22 AM
7

But you make that for 5 years then, depending on your expenses, you aren't going to do much better than breaking even. And you spent 9 years getting all the way back to where you started.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 07:19 AM
2

They weren't immense sacrifices but for a substantial time my dad definitely got the better deal even as women look at things. Still, overall my dad sacrificed more. Just not at the same time as my mother.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 06:09 AM
5

There's a lot to be said about this actually. The highest SMV women I know don't sacrifice anything at all for others. Even mild encroachments on their time, wealth and status are met with resistance and equitable trade is demanded. Other women sacrifice to various degrees. From what I've seen of my parents, a woman's level of sacrifice seems to follow how enamored she is with a man. There's little or no social demand for women to sacrifice anything for their man (only their children) so most wo…
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 05:32 AM
3

Notably, people can't tell the difference between egalitarian and misogynistic men - the assumption whenever a man isn't "benevolently" sexist is that he hates women. This is true of female and male observers though I don't recall the political alignment of the test subjects.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 05:18 AM
2

It's the usual mix you expect when a lot of people want the attention of a few people like with celebrities: attention and stuff whether you want them or not. It's definitely a position of greater power though and unlikely celebrity, gamers can just do something else if you don't like it.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 04:50 AM
3

Machiavelli, known as one of the greatest callous schemers of all time This isn't true. He's known for this sort of behavior because he wrote openly about how power actually worked. It's notable that he seemed to prefer republics even though everyone knows him for writing about the behavior of power in principalities in The Prince. This is all aside from your actual point though.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 04:33 AM
-1

That doesn't matter very much. All public corporations are required to represent shareholders' interests. Meaning they have to maximize profit. Maximizing profit over everything else, including the long-term survival of humanity, is commonly called evil. It doesn't really matter who is in charge since they only occupy a role. Failure to fit into that role means being removed from it. The real problem is that public corporations exist. Which is where individual culpability really comes to a head:…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 04:18 AM
5

Yeah, if she made comparable sacrifices. Somehow I doubt it.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 03:44 AM
12

This is the most cynical thing I have ever read. Excellent!
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 03:40 AM
1

Fair enough. I was thinking that deflecting responsibility was more akin to scapegoating then abandoning ship since that absolves both responsibility and consequences, up to a point.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/14 03:18 AM
8

I think the big difference is in how the woman approaches the relationship. If she actually looks at it as a partnership then classifying each person's accomplishments as a mutual accomplishment is good - it causes incentives toward unity. If she instead looks at her husband as her tool then it's bad - her incentive is as a parasite. You can tell the difference because when things go poorly, the good woman takes responsibility and the bad woman deflects responsibility to her man.
/r/TheRedPill09/08/14 10:15 PM
1

I don't disagree but I really just meant that i could have used someone wise in the ways that I am not. I have a friend I can call but this seemed too trivial while with a wife it would just be describing my day after work.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 07:29 AM
1

Literally millions of years where the best tool at her female ancestors' disposal was your male ancestors. Oh, mechanism? Body language, baseline skepticism in the limited domain of human intent and will, and an immense quantity of data on you informing her intuition.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 07:23 AM
5

This reminds me of a rule of writing: you can break the rules only when you have mastered them. Here, this means you could do something like (fake) drop a woman when carrying her only she knows in her gut that you did so intentionally. I'm not sure when dropping a woman like that would make sense but still the concept applies. Mmm maybe more lucidly: if you fuck up in anything at all and try to play it off as a joke, you can't get away with it unless you have enough other indicators of competenc…
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 07:18 AM
2

I say to start with the personal stuff first - do your own thing and invite her along, improve yourself, lift, etc. Give her some time to see that you are suddenly behaving differently. Don't brag about it or even mention it except in passing - but start getting some results. Once she sees that you're serious and making progress on yourself, and you begin to feel that progress, then she will be more receptive to coming along with you. As an aside: this is actually true of everybody. People will …
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 07:13 AM
1

This would make more sense in /r/asktrp.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 07:11 AM
1

But I do mean a standard of behavior and motivations, and an understanding of what is and is not acceptable. I honestly don't think this is a good thing for everyone. Most people, yes, give them ethics as a heuristic. But I think everyone with an inclination toward wisdom should know that even though you fall back on heuristics so you don't become a monster, deeper understanding necessarily breaks those rules. This is the same reason I advocate consequentialism with a heavy emphasis on human fal…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 07:07 AM
19

Seriously. The conscientious course of action, if a woman won't accept LTR-without-one-sided-legal-contract, is to cut her from the bulk or entirety of your life and focus on raising SMV and finding a better woman. A year of reduced pussy frequency starting now is so so so so much better than over a decade of indentured servitude a decade from now. Or put another way: be a man and do the rational thing.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 07:01 AM
27

The willful ignorance is astonishing. Not surprising but dammit if I'm not astonished that people in general really are this stupid.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 06:54 AM
0

Right. Jokes can just be jokes but this was a calculated political move.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 06:46 AM
0

For politics the wife always provides me with invaluable advice. I tell her what is happening, and she can usually identify they person who is not trust worthy. I then do further investigations and she is usually correct. See this shit would have helped me today. In retrospect, the manipulation was obvious. God damn it.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 06:44 AM
0

Our culture's zeitgeist is firmly pro-female and anti-male. While you're very much correct, the path to equality from where we are now is paved in statements like /u/JihadDerp's and specifically egalitarian statements. Not that the folks here are generally in favor of egalitarianism but for now, at least, they're working toward it.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 06:38 AM
1

How many women have that much force of personality? Virtually no men do and the outskirts of ability tend to be occupied by men. He wasn't a directly productive individual but what he did was rare and difficult.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 06:32 AM
3

You can probably add the Iroquois to that dynamic, if a little modified. The women held property but men did not. If my native friend is to be believed, women also controlled the materials needed for full-scale war. Men held positions of leadership. AKA women were involved in material trade (if not a true market) and men held social trade. I first heard of the concept about a year ago from a book called Debt: The First 5,000 Years. It's from a mainstream publisher, but the author still made it f…
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 06:30 AM
1

No one who thinks they are so smart hours around telling you that. They demonstrate it. Yup. Hell, done right, you can even fake high intelligence to most people by being entirely comfortable in your intellect and occasionally expressing high intelligence even if it takes you comparably longer to formulate.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 06:20 AM
1

Which is sad because women are virtually always prettier and more socially competent and aware. If only feminists didn't venerate masculine attributes and ways to power...
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 06:17 AM
3

I recognize that I don't know much here but how smart do doctors really need to be? Most of what doctors seem to do is just be a biological expert system. The manual stuff can mostly be done by nurses, at least for general practitioners. The trickier stuff and research really really needs smart people but otherwise, isn't a good memory enough?
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 06:15 AM
1

This begs the question: do feminist brains break at rape jokes because they can't differentiate between serious and non-serious speech?
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 06:09 AM
0

Fascinating. Women Sometimes Provoke Men Into Violence Why don't you believe that's literally true?
/r/MensRights07/08/14 06:07 AM
1

Yes, many. Even though it's common sense, there are even people here that don't believe that a man, when abused by a woman, can snap and become violent.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 06:05 AM
3

It's also 100% true. Obviously so, given the word "some". More than that, it's frequently true: women are about as abusive as men but when they provoke men, their shit gets fucked up worse than when men provoke women. Most of the time. Rhetorically speaking, just being honest is probably more useful than pandering. Almost everyone that's heard of this sub hears about it from feminists and well over 99% of feminists spread outright lies about what MRAs believe anyway. Pandering at best makes newc…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 06:03 AM
1

It is important, at the same time, to ensure that you adhere to a code of ethics, and have an internal source of shame when you break that code, and to self-correct. I'll delete this if you had a rhetorical purpose but otherwise: This isn't strictly necessary. Just having a strong sense of self - and I mean strong, not just "oh yeah I found myself" - eliminates the need for a code of ethics or shame because you self-correct anyway.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 06:00 AM
3

His description of monarchy isn't wrong but causally speaking, fathers don't call their daughters princess because of statism. Their statism is unrelated.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 05:54 AM
3

more intuitive I've heard this but it strikes me as a huge signal that the speaker is a fool. Anyone that's put effort into introspection knows that intuition can pick up a lot but ultimately depends on what you've learned. Yet some women assign mystic powers to their intuition. I sincerely doubt women have better intuition than men so much as other women tell them they do.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 05:49 AM
1

Or put another way, we have such a mercenary (individualist) culture that it matters way the fuck less than human norm.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 05:47 AM
1

You're missing the point but that's still pretty cool.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 05:45 AM
12

Huh. That's fucking weird.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 05:44 AM
2

This is why I don't consider it villainous to point out that men actually do have a higher average IQ than women - unadjusted for gender since the scores of women are raised to force an equal mean. IQ tests, especially in the higher end, favor mental traits at which men excel. IQ still tells us a lot about a person's mental aptitude but not enough to justify saying calling one person smart and another stupid because those adjectives have more meaning than can be derived from IQ alone.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 05:43 AM
6

The differences in average IQ between men and women are small in magnitude and inconsistent in direction I think they're overstating the inconsistency. At least in the later section, they brought up multiple studies but only one found adult women to have a higher average IQ. Also while not strong evidence, before wikipedia invited feminist bias participation, the IQ article simply stated that men had a higher average IQ but scores were adjusted to eliminate this. So I think it's likely that any …
/r/MensRights07/08/14 05:35 AM
3

Right? Oh, a second date. Fun. You pay for another meal and she still isn't fucking you. There's almost no chance she's actually an interesting enough person for her conversation to be worth both your time and whatever money you spent (aka your time).
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 03:09 AM
1

I suspect it's usually jealousy. Their daughter is still young so she is still approaching her SMV peak. Women rationalize it but they know that the younger version of them can land any man that they can plus much, much better men.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 02:59 AM
1

Yep as a child of a single mother she tried to recreate the relationship dynamic with me and lashed out for no reason at times. Holy shit. My mother never did this but her female friend actually started to... I mean, I don't know why I was able to hold frame w/ her crying and me being 14 but holy shit am I glad my mother put a stop to that before I broke from her more advanced tactics. It didn't occur to me how meaningful it was for my mother to use my young age as the reason her friend needed t…
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 02:57 AM
1

I mean, they can, but the former hooker I know sure as shit didn't like any of her johns. If anything it's probably why she outright hates men. Yet still she's highly charismatic.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 02:52 AM
1

If you have any reasons to believe that you may have some residual guilt, do report her to the police, or a responsible parent or family member. Keep in mind that her friends and family will likely harass you for "getting her in trouble". Seriously.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 02:48 AM
2

Women attempt much more than men This isn't actually known. It's a bullshit statistic. I reckon it's probably true of the type of attention-seeking and impermanent types of suicide women attempt but for men, we load a gun but don't quite pull the trigger. You don't get your stomach pumped for that but you came closer to ending it than advil-popper the liver-killer.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 02:47 AM
1

I suspect that women raised by single fathers are actually better LTR prospects than women raised by a mother, with or without a father. Assuming the father isn't a card-carrying feminist, it's one of the only ways to seriously reduce the influence of feminine entitlement on children. Mothers could do this too but don't because their 5 closest friends determine most of their beliefs and personality.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 02:44 AM
1

I'd be interested in your perspective if you self-posted here. I know that women are generally more open around other women so you likely have some insights we won't get anywhere else.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 02:39 AM
1

Huh? If he acted like the father to her kid then he's likely on hook for child support. Biology only matters if there isn't a wealthier man to rationalize robbing.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 02:31 AM
1

If anything, he's a particularly nice guy. I would have just neglected to respond, leaving her in the dark.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 02:30 AM
1

Just to try to break the monotony, I would crack some joke about something. They would look at me like I was crazy or undisciplined or something, to be able to divert my attention away from the rows of numbers long enough to act like a human for second. I wasn't fucking around. I was pulling my load and doing my share. And outside of school, those guys end up doing the boring-as-shit work while more personable guys, that management and executives actually wants to talk to (or at least can stand)…
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 02:05 AM
1

Hey now, I'm the product of my mother wanting to tie down my father. Which is pretty funny, actually. She told me that my father told her that having his children would tie him down. A decade later I asked him and he told me that he did not phrase it that way and definitely not with that intent.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 01:59 AM
1

How alpha was your dad? Like, biological dad.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 01:57 AM
1

To make italics, surround text with single asterisks. Double for bold.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 01:52 AM
3

Perhaps in another time and place, taking a run with a single mom had some value due to the fact that society would have shamed her into humility. Today men are expected to support single mothers and fatherless children. Most still don't be that only fuels the misandry fires. In the past, as you say, she would have been humble. More from material need than shame, I suspect, but still enough to genuinely view her new man as a good person.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 01:51 AM
109

Funny how much respect we give their tears when they are fake, and how little we get when ours are real. Holy shit dude. Write more!
/r/TheRedPill05/08/14 06:59 AM
1

Just conjecture but I doubt it's as soul-sucking since a whore is someone you don't love and whom never loved you.
/r/TheRedPill30/07/14 03:18 AM
7

Feminism is a particular social movement. Women's rights activism is not a particular movement. For instance, suffragettes weren't necessarily feminists but they were women's rights activists. The distinction is valuable because a lot of people, especially MRAs, distinguish between what feminists claim to support (gender equality) and feminist praxis. The "I don't need feminism because" fad is an example of women supporting women's rights but opposing feminism. Feminists nearly universally deny …
/r/MensRights30/07/14 03:13 AM
3

I second this. It's possible for a healthy man to not want sex for six months into a relationship but it's grossly improbable. Hell it's unlikely for women to not want sex for six months, when you include wanting sex with men other than their SO.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 08:22 AM
3

Only well past the wall. Most women experience very little rejection until they hit high 20's to low 30's because before then, they could be passive and still have an active sex life if they wanted. Obviously some women are unattractive or shut-ins and so know how to deal with rejection but it's likely you don't want to be with them or you wouldn't meet them anyway. So if you want to date 40 year old women then you're golden.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 08:19 AM
1

How much statistics do women's and various minorities' studies majors need to take?
/r/MensRights28/07/14 08:15 AM
2

The corollary is that you need to work your ass off so you can walk away with little risk of being much worse off. The first advice given to men seeking the red pill isn't "lift" for no reason - and it applies to all aspects of life.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/14 08:06 AM
5

45%
/r/TRPOffTopic28/07/14 05:56 AM
4

I look at neckbeards about the same as I look at women that don't shave (legbeards): I don't care. People that do care are almost always fucktards in one way or another. They're people that, instead of ignoring people they aren't attracted to, go out of their way to say nasty things to. They're bullies. This doesn't include people that just express their relevant opinion but does include either Kyro540 or the people he's saying MRAs need to deal with or cater to. That being said, at least neckbe…
/r/MensRights28/07/14 05:45 AM
1

Those replacements wouldn't work for the women I know since many are quite happy without being what I'd call sane.
/r/TheRedPill28/07/14 02:35 AM
7

Or it's a sign of the use of colloquialisms. It is a thought-terminating cliche though. Like how the previous generation said that women understand men but men can't understand women. It's untrue but men choose to believe it because other men tell them it's true and abdicates their responsibility to find the truth.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/14 09:42 PM
-6

My experience leads to me believe that women are sane if they have a strong man to absorb the crazy. Such men are by necessity alpha and therefore usually fairly RP, if ignorant about the notion of RP vs BP. Fathers today are usually BP so girls are crazy when young*. When they leave home, even if they had an RP father they are in the absence of strong men since those men are usually slutting it up with the crazy chicks. Of course I mean crazy in the colloquial sense. It's actually not great ter…
/r/TheRedPill27/07/14 09:35 PM
11

I know a few sane women. 100% of them have a strong man in their lives.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/14 09:25 PM
15

She also needs to consider where she's meeting men.
/r/RedPillWomen27/07/14 07:56 PM
8

It seems odd that a woman's testimony counts for more than a man's. Don't feminists protest the exact reverse in poor Islamic countries?
/r/MensRights27/07/14 04:45 AM
2

That's what it looked like to me too. They were clearly either idiots or drunk as well since, as Menadian said, they didn't protect him as they guided him away... but still, they weren't rough with him.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/14 04:39 AM
2

people are in MRAs I, for one, am really two little people stacked vertically. Both favor bold language because my audience either understands the context of generalizations or are too stupid to be convinced with reason.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 04:37 AM
-2

Acting to defend pride is just another way common men make themselves the tools of sociopaths.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 04:31 AM
2

PS- Love is one of those words that can't be defined and has different meanings for everyone. Similar to words like beauty, dating, morals etc. Apparently also true of the word deserves. I don't think emotional attachments of any sort are subject to duty. Also I consider love to be an emotional attachment.
/r/RedPillWomen24/07/14 08:38 AM
5

On the other hand, I fucked up little things as a child but teachers loved me so I got away with it. A lot of smart boys are restless because they're poorly suited to feminized education. Honestly I wish I were less well-suited to such bullshit but such is life.
/r/TheRedPill23/07/14 03:12 AM
19

It won't always be so but right now, being an MRA virtually guarantees knowing more about feminism than 90% of feminists. You don't become an MRA without rejecting feminism at some point but almost no feminists rejected the MRM to find feminism. Overcoming a belief is uncommon and difficult but reaffirming a belief is common and easy.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 03:07 AM
2

edit: Didn't realize you aren't the guy I responded to. You do realize people have had success for a long time without needing to see the world in the exact binary fashion of TRP or TBP - so why do you need to? You're mistaken in believing that I see it as a binary but that wasn't why you said this anyway... you're just deflecting. I mean, where is the evidence for TRP? It's entirely anecdotal Most of the evidence comes from implementing RP ideas in ones life. Field reports and the like are stil…
/r/TheRedPill21/07/14 12:38 AM
2

You're surprisingly cogent so maybe this will help one of us: do you have rational reasons to reject TRP in favor of TBP? It's something I'm looking for but haven't had much chance to find... Most BPers are firm in their beliefs because they don't see sufficient evidence to even begin to question them. Naturally this is a gigantic hump since confirmation bias, among others, makes this evidence quota ridiculously large. Most of my deviations from social norms are due to me forcing myself to justi…
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 10:22 PM
4

Only a little. I'm way more impressed she actually made this video. It's directly counter to her personal interests and those of all marriageable women, which likely includes all of her friends.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 12:16 AM
14

Maybe following the "OMG misogyny in tech" trend?
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 12:07 AM
8

Rogers was pure BP so no, he is nothing like TRP. It doesn't matter that his views were superficially similar. BTW you have a tell in that you equate anti-feminism with hating women.
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 12:06 AM
7

It's like my anxiety was based around my past beliefs without realising it I suspect the neuroticism you see in tumblrinas is also the result of cognitive dissonance. Their subconscious clearly knows something's wrong but they keep up the narrative that other people are the problem. This never even approaches a solution so their anxiety grows into hysteria.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/14 07:56 PM
7

I don't know about direct SMV reduction but the people you spend your time with affect your personality. If he's the sort to complain instead of solve then at best you gain no motivation from interacting with him... most likely, you lose some. If he were the sort to make things happen then you'd gain that motivation too.
/r/TheRedPill19/07/14 07:51 PM
1

Right. It's the law-abiding men that suffer the most here.
/r/MensRights19/07/14 07:48 PM
4

Sounds like you're too weak-willed to act the way you believe you should act. The first step is to articulate exactly what you are choosing. It sounds like you are only considering the next few months to a year so that's all I'm considering here. Options: Dump her and fuck those other women. You get novelty and lose commitment perks. She gets hurt. Fuck all of the women. You get novelty and might lose commitment perks. She gets hurt worse. Commit to her. You don't get novelty but you keep commit…
/r/askTRP18/07/14 03:36 AM
6

Not really. Pedo hysterics is principally a gender problem because men are villainized and men are the principal victims. Children and women also suffer quite a bit from useless fear and reduced positive male involvement. It does for sure feed into the prison-industrial complex but that really just makes the dynamic worse for men. If there was no imprisonment associated with pedo hysteria then accused men would still be ostracized - they'd just also still be free.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 02:49 AM
32

It is a little strange how women are the only oppressed group in America that the law treats better than their oppressors.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 02:37 AM
3

For symmetry: it's like calling someone anti-woman instead of pro-life for their views on abortion. The abortion "debate" helped me break out of my naive view that the people that agreed with me (and that I agreed with) were right because they were good at being right and so everyone else was bad at being right.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 11:17 PM
2

Do you have a particular epistemology that you use to tell truth from illusion? Your argument is that some epistemology is necessary and has to do a good job of differentiating truth from falsehood. It's a pretty basic argument but it's fair to bring up when someone's calling you delusional :) . Some people say they use science as their epistemology but that's really a process and a culture; science's epistemology is empiricism. The strength of my belief in many RP ideas is ultimately rooted in …
/r/askTRP15/07/14 09:44 AM
3

He's talking about people that are too busy to waste time in pointless pursuit of shallow and fleeting validation. I'm talking about people that get validation elsewhere. There's a lot of overlap but there are busy people that don't get validated and people that get validated but still have plenty of free time.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 09:18 AM
16

"Male dominated x caused woman to behave badly" is an ad hoc hypothesis to support the theory that sexual violence of any sort and degree is the result of men or "the patriarchy". This is one of the ways that a belief held in faith is protected against contrary evidence.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 04:18 AM
1

Bond is based on chance that someone will run though, right? So that doesn't mean much. They just don't think she'll run. The really fucked up part is that they're right: she is in much less danger from the courts than him.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 04:13 AM
25

The reality is that competent people, those who have a goal and follow it, simply don't have the time to post sexy social media photos in order to fish for validation. Also such people are already validated from their actions so they don't need to seek validation from their appearance.
/r/TheRedPill15/07/14 04:02 AM
6

If she was with her other friends and thought it would be funny to get the boy to touch her breasts then I see it as harmless, but considering they were alone it makes it more sinister than that. Huh. This might not be very simple since my reaction is exactly the opposite: if it were with a group then I'd see it as sexual but also dehumanizing, fucking with his sexuality when he gets older. One-on-one it's more intimate. There's a pretension of it being "just a joke" when it's a group but that's…
/r/MensRights09/07/14 05:58 AM
11

What's shocking is that that scenario is logically consistent with the way that court so far is handling this.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 05:54 AM
1

My only serious disagreement is that not all date rape is a mistake. I do like the idea of dropping the term all together in favor of "rape" and "mistake sex" though: it's either rape or not-rape so there's no need to invent a term for intermediate connotations. It doesn't look like that's what she's advocating for though.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 04:01 AM
1

You could counter by dismissing their completely unjustified speculation as completely unjustified speculation. They don't sound smart enough to do anything but screech in response so research isn't going to help you counter anything.
/r/askTRP07/07/14 02:49 AM
5

Asshole and confidence aren't synonyms. If anything, being genuine requires way more confidence than being an asshole. You have to trust that your weakness won't be exploited or that you can deal if it is. I get what you're saying though.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 01:21 AM
36

They get sympathetic to women for wanting what they know they shouldn't, stopping all critical thought dead cold. It's hard to see the pedestal because sometimes it hides behind thought-terminating thoughts.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 11:10 PM
2

Learn one game or another. No matter what, you need to learn to act dominant. Assholes dominate but so can other behavior sets.
/r/TheRedPill06/07/14 11:07 PM
3

as it would also further suggest that women aren't disadvantaged when it comes to wages Rather it suggests that wages are a poor indicator of advantage and disadvantage in wealth.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 05:12 PM
8

Make sure to post the kickstarter here.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 07:42 PM
2

The etymology here is hilarious. What kind of holy day does one get from sucking two dozen dicks?
/r/TheRedPill05/07/14 07:01 PM
2

Really it sounds like she was enacting a humiliation fetish. An essentially valueless reward is (or should be) calculated to enhance her perverse pleasure.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/14 02:37 AM
2

It's not a huge difference to me but I'm much the same: competence in women is sexy. Not as sexy as a nice ass but still relevant. In the masculine dual-mating strategy, competence is sexy in wives but not plates.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/14 01:48 AM
6

That's my thought. She could just be saying that she wants to try exhibitionism, public sex and/or BDSM. Seeing as she's saying it's "like modeling", she isn't particularly emotionally mature so it's pretty likely she doesn't know how to talk plainly about what she wants.
/r/askTRP02/07/14 05:24 AM
4

guilt machine Indie band name 2014.
/r/askTRP02/07/14 05:21 AM
1

last several years You're a liar. This sub isn't that old. Since you're also a sociopath, that isn't very surprising. What is surprising is that you think a blatant, trivial lie like that wouldn't raise any flags to your genuineness.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/14 03:12 AM
3

We don't have a talent gap, we have a realistic employer gap. Just last year it was revealed that Apple, Google, and Intel had colluded illegally to supress tech-worker wages. 1[1] 2[2] 3[3] Well shit man nevermind. I was pulling from my experience that I am certain of in my job since I am involved in hiring decisions but if there's evidence of your stronger assertion then for sure I'm wrong. Or highly likely anyway. Thanks for informing me!
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 05:10 AM
9

Can't overemphasize this. The worst breakup (not divorce) I ever saw was a girl freaking out about her non-exclusive boyfriend seeing other women. No ability to deal with her jealousy.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/14 06:37 PM
3

And yet doing so is an extremely strong move. You can say complete bullshit and the other party can't retaliate... even if they're reporting a legitimate event and you lied. Don't get caught, obviously. Rereading what I wrote I'd like to say that I don't advocate these per se. They're just tools you sometimes need. Their efficacy is a testament to how advantaged women are in social conflict.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/14 05:31 AM
4

If it were about the kids then they'd absolutely disclose for 1) medical reasons and 2) so each kid has a shot at knowing their genetic father.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/14 05:21 AM
12

It still shocks me that most women lack the empathy to realize how big a deal paternity is to men precisely because we really can't know. The selective pressure has got to have had some effect on us at a genetic level since paternity has been relevant for our species' entire existence. And even if it didn't, it's hugely relevant to each man's legacy.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/14 05:18 AM
1

I know this is insensitive but I find that really interesting. Do you know why you feel pathetic crying alone in your room or on your bed?
/r/TheRedPill24/06/14 05:02 AM
1

I'm reasonably certain that ta-rp was saying literally exactly that. A general "we".
/r/TheRedPill24/06/14 04:38 AM
3

Yup. Women use many destructive tactics in their power games but most work just as well for men. You can't garner sympathy against a woman without far more social capital than her but you can work the bureaucracy, use shame, use inclusion and exclusion, etc. Basically just Machiavellian plays that women are already heavily socialized to excel at. Plus they don't anticipate a man using them!
/r/TheRedPill24/06/14 04:37 AM
3

I've always had a horrible time doing this because best and worst are too easy to extrapolate to absurd scenarios. For anyone with my problem, I solved it by instead guessing the probabilities of each event and their respective reward & risk. It makes it easier to filter out scenarios that are low probability and carry little reward or risk.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 05:13 AM
15

People project what they think about and cheaters think about cheating. So do people who are cheated on a lot in the past.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 01:31 AM
12

Even the MRM doesn't actually talk about rape, it talks about false accusations Which is unfortunately since male rape victims are glossed over and even laughed at.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 07:01 PM
2

Emotional black hole shuts that shit down cold.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/14 06:55 AM
17

Relevant statistic: The majority of women who admitted they still hadn't found the perfect partner despite being married believed this was because they were still attracted to other men. So the majority of a third of women don't remotely understand female attraction.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/14 05:10 AM
3

This is also why dogs of untrained owners are aggressive and ineffectual. It's a universal dynamic.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/14 02:19 AM
8

A hot girl is just as likely to have an awesome personality as a fattie, if not more so. Seriously though, it's not like I haven't given unattractive girls the benefit of the doubt in this arena but they're usually just sad. The rare unattractive woman is happy. Hot girls? Often happy and the women with the best personalities I've ever met have all been hot. Probably a feedback effect. If you're sad you overeat which makes you unattractive which makes you sad. Conversely if you're attractive the…
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 04:14 PM
9

1-2 points happens a lot but I've only seen 3+ when it's interracial. "Minorities" and white girls don't seem to be on equal footing when it comes to how they perceive SMV. Supposedly the same is true of white guys and asian girls in asia.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 04:10 PM
3

No sense of causality...surely the divorce gave the ex-husband the wake-up call he needed to work to improve himself. Solipsism plain and simple. She doesn't see other people as deep enough to face inner turmoil and reach a resolution that isn't directly guided by her. In his story she's the trigger to him fixing his life. That doesn't look like that in her story so she doesn't see it at all.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 04:08 PM
3

Beta bucks is desirable when the State isn't there to act as a replacement. Female attraction doesn't change but priorities and incentives do.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 03:31 PM
2

So... present as low value at work. Like how feminists bitch about women needing to do. This shit is hilarious man. Is there anything about feminism that isn't at least partially projection?
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 04:32 AM
3

Nearly ANY girl, or guy, can easily be a 6.5-7 if they workout. (At least in America.) Yup. I have exactly that girl in mind. Nothing really going on physically except that she's in excellent shape. Pushed her from about a 4 to almost a 7.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 04:28 AM
7

Unfortunately, this seems to be human nature. Rationality is hard-won for our species.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 04:27 AM
20

Well honestly, traits of a good homemaker and mother are also valuable to men looking to settle down. A master's degree is just not among the accomplishments of a woman that makes her attractive to the vast majority of men.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 04:20 AM
4

Damn straight. The most I feel is trepidation because there's a high chance she'll fuck up the vibe over something stupid because she can't reconcile her education with reality.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 04:17 AM
6

Kind of. If you're in a poor society and you're a woman looking to snag a beta with a good salary then you want to get some higher education. Maybe not a phd but a bachelor's or master's is good. The trick is that you are one of the few women among many men for years so you can snag a husband before he graduates and finds that he's actually desirable to women below his present economic class.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 04:13 AM
11

so who wants to tell her that it's only gonna get worse? I'd better enjoy yelling at her for feeling entitled to sex. It's not true but it's a perfect mirror of the Douchebag Nice Guy trope.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 04:10 AM
13

A commenter said something interesting: [-] trail22 5 Points 19:10:20, 18 June I think you are the female equivalent of the nice guy. The nice guy sees what they themselves would want in a partner and tries to be that. You are what you would want; not what he actually wants. Also there are are plenty of guys on this subreddit who are successful and smart that can't find women including doctors and business owners. Believe me; when I see a pretty girl and smile; no women knows I am smart and succ…
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 04:09 AM
22

Can't blame her for taking what's offered but you can blame her for rationalizing his and her motives.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 04:06 AM
1

Haha yeah. Truth is you're probably right. I'm just pretty sure I didn't fuck anyone before I turned 7.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/14 06:46 AM
2

wrong
/r/TheRedPill18/06/14 06:32 AM
3

Well they are MRA-adjacent: anti-MRA. Kind of like the author... oh god Moviebob hates women and is going to hunt them down for not sleeping with him! By his own logic this is true. This must be a last cry for help oh god
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:54 AM
6

Not a very good one since the husband 1) married, 2) doesn't work on improving his own value to others and 3) is still with a woman he doesn't find attractive.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:52 AM
1

Also make sure you see the judge after lunch. I forget the exact difference but there's a significant rise in leniency when the judge is not longer hungry.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:50 AM
1

It's rhetorically meant to create a false dichotomy even if it logically didn't do so.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:36 AM
2

Given how closely he mirrored anti-gay arguments and that that subreddit specifically permits devil's advocates, it's likely he was not expressing his own beliefs. I've done the same in /r/CMV. Sadly even the people in that subreddit frequently don't understand that people can say things they don't believe. edit: this is pretty funny. You ask him if he's autistic but you're the one incapable of recognizing when someone says something they don't literally believe. That isn't necessarily an autist…
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:31 AM
1

Toronto seems like an interesting place. I keep hearing about it for good and bad things. It's got a heavy radical feminist presence and enough men's rights presence to host talks and apparently even progressive enough that psychiatrists are taking steps to help men.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:28 AM
2

I expect "pussy pass" to be the phrasing that takes off but I agree that it's a shitty name.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:24 AM
1

To be fair, giveupitscrazy is referring to a single sentencing. While gender and race have similar effects on sentencing, a single scenario can be predicted to affect all men equally if it's egregious or benign enough since this is binary: "got away with it" or not. Black men would for sure get more time and less likely to get a plea deal than white men but they could all get some punishment.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:20 AM
4

Oh come on people! Free speech and due process are enemies of progress. This bit of poem exemplifies the right way of thinking: The rule of law, in complex times, Has proved itself deficient. We much prefer the rule of men! It's vastly more efficient. In times such as ours we need to quickly silence the bigoted misogynist rapists roaming our streets and campuses or they'll oppress our world under the iron fist of patriarchy. That we also live under today.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 05:17 AM
6

Most people have at least some form anyway. I was born with a strain but no one cares because it's not one of the ones people freak out about.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/14 04:59 AM
1

Yes because saying sad things to people not themselves affected by a tragedy does any good for anyone except the people saying those things because they get to feel like they're good people even when they don't actually improve anyone's lives. Like yourself.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 06:53 AM
7

see: Elliot Rogers' victims
/r/MensRights17/06/14 06:51 AM
1

The last statistic about child support for multiple children is what makes your conclusion that the average child support payment is about $50. more a month than it should be incorrect. You didn't multiply the annual child rearing costs by the number of children being supported. Good point but it's not clear if the $430 is per child or total. The wording does suggest total though. Unfortunately their source link is broken. The next problem with your conclusion is assuming child support obligatio…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 02:48 AM
6

Cool. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_of_raising_a_child Assuming we're talking about the lower end because most people are in there, the average for dual-parent is 169,080 per child for 18 years. Per year that's 9393. Per month that's 783. Half of that is 391. For lower class single-child households it's 364. I'm guessing you got $350 a month from the anti-MRA article that pops up first when googling "average child support". If you look in the linked pdf, it's from 1990-1992 updated to 2004 d…
/r/MensRights15/06/14 08:17 PM
8

if the same person also says the same of men on mother's day
/r/MensRights15/06/14 07:57 PM
7

Even little things would help; like telling girls in sex ed that an erection in no way implies consent.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 07:55 PM
2

Just recording that you paid more in basic supplies and child-specific costs would justify the child support if I were auditing. Recording down to the ounce of milk is silly but recording that you paid three times as much in groceries would be reasonable. The goal here is to ensure that child support isn't being abused, not fuck with the custodial parent. Ideally you'd just pay for child things with a card designated for that and use mint.com or something to compile the report. Things like rent …
/r/MensRights15/06/14 07:49 PM
1

She should given that she survived on public support for some period of her life and that's primarily fed by men.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 07:38 PM
7

And to think my sister told me verbatim that she will never feel sorry for males about inequities like these because they have such an upper hand in life. And she's the most reasonable of the lot of them. Sorry bro but she isn't very reasonable. For a feminist, yes, incredibly reasonable but there are many women that are much more reasonable.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 06:41 PM
3

Sure, so long as she plays second fiddle. We don't need to be another social movement appropriated by feminism. All the good intentions in the world don't change the reality of feminist praxis. It's reasonable but misguided feminists like squirrel that sell people on a toxic movement.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 07:01 AM
4

Really it's about youth. A young woman only has to have basic hygiene, not be obese, not disfigured and not actually hide her youth and the greater majority of men will be attracted to her. The best men will demand she not be overweight but this still leaves her the upper-tier betas. Getting married is harder but few enough young women want long-term relationships until they hit the wall so the number of thirsty betas makes this easy for young women. Old women need to try much harder even to get…
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 11:23 PM
2

That works until she realizes that yes, you are all bluster. The underlying reality is that divorce favors the woman economically and if she's young then she can fuck a lot of alphas then marry a new beta if she wants. Hell even if she's not that young she can still find some beta.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 11:06 PM
2

That's doubtful. Capitalism has a short but bloody and oppressive history. Christianity has a long, blood and oppressive history. An ideology based on those two tenets - especially since they're inherently incompatible - is unlikely to provide anything useful.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:44 PM
1

Wouldn't surprise me.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 11:57 AM
3

Feminists grossly misapply marxism to gender relations. You have to first prove that capitalist-worker relations can be usefully mapped to male-female relations before you can extrapolate fucking anything that isn't utter nonsense but THEY NEVER DO THAT! Seriously, power over generations is maintained by capital but not by gender because men have daughters and women have sons. Race works the same way as capital to a lesser degree but more spread-out because it's inherited but the benefits and co…
/r/MensRights14/06/14 11:08 AM
1

Really though, most of both the left and right are tools. It's inevitable even among the radicals. But that shit isn't inherent to the underlying assumptions and intentions. It's like baptism: has nothing really to do with the important bits of the belief structure but are along for the ride.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:56 AM
2

The actual political parties you mean in the US. Everywhere and everywhen else, libertarian means left-libertarian. It's only in America that libertarianism is remotely compatible with capitalism. The wikipedia article does a good job of summarizing http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:49 AM
4

Historically "libertarian" refers to left-libertarianism. The American version of libertarianism is perverse to libertarians everywhere else in the world. Specifically though: the Left is against hierarchy and the Right is in favor of hierarchy. Left-libertarians believe that individual rights are central to the destruction of hierarchy and therefore coercion. Right-libertarians believe the same but also believe that economic coercion either doesn't exist under idealized capitalism or isn't coer…
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:46 AM
3

TBH you're right. The Right's narrative is still severely harmful to men but there's open-mindedness about the issues that could eventually foster positive changes. The Left is even now still being more heavily infected with feminism so there won't be anything there for at least a decade.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:42 AM
5

Ironically, I used to be on the left, but the constant hatred on men pushed me away. So misandry is in some part responsible for my current political position. I disassociate with the Left for exactly this reason but I'm still a socialist. The biggest effect is the coup de grace on my belief that maybe it's possible for a vanguard party to do the right thing. I know what kind of people make up the majority of the radical Left in a capitalist society. Those fuckers must never hold power.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:39 AM
2

while feminists are almost universally on the (extreme) left, that does not mean that everyone on the left supports feminism. Bullshit. Most feminists are liberals and liberals are barely left of center. Actual "extreme" leftists are universally socialists.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 10:35 AM
1

Having gone to an extremely progressive high school, I can say the actual mindset is to grab onto new ideas to find out which ones make the world better. Actual progressive thought is looked at as idealistic or not worth considering yet. Which is sad, really. The failure is that ideas aren't judged on the right criteria. This isn't really a problem with liberal or leftist thought so much as with the particular culture surrounding it. Assumptions aren't questioned. It's why I loathe the feminist …
/r/TheRedPill13/06/14 04:43 AM
1

It reduces the birthrate.
/r/MensRights12/06/14 09:23 AM
51

most are too shortsighted to see men as an investment More of a modern phenomenon. Young women almost always fail to recognize if a man is a good investment or even care but older women coach them to marry a man that will be a useful husband. Or they did until the State's collective extraction of male labor for female entitlement reduced the necessity.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/14 08:56 AM
3

I read somewhere that childhood trauma from molestation tends to manifest only after realizing that molestation occurred. The trauma isn't in the act but in the victim's reaction to the narrative surrounding the act. Like how they're now a victim.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/14 08:51 AM
1

During my childhood the adjective "nice" was always used when you had nothing to say about a person. They're boring but not actively unpleasant.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 10:46 AM
1

I maintain frame by remembering that people respond to incentives. Give into a tantrum and you have to deal with more tantrums. Someone does something intending to benefit me? Reward it even if it's not useful or is a minor break in my moral beliefs.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 10:44 AM
1

I hold a strong stance against the existence of Thor in particular. So much so that it defines my identity.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 04:56 AM
2

Not sure if we are thinking of the same event but he was raping this one woman repeatedly. He had his men bring her to him. IIRC it was actually her children he murdered in place of the Stark boys. In the show he just fucked the wildling woman and she duped him.
/r/TheRedPill09/06/14 03:59 AM
6

I have a trick for identifying the male hamster: when you start constructing a narrative explaining events, flip your preferred outcome and see if you are equally good at explaining that too. Then you know you're just rationalizing. Big thing I realized is that there aren't good reasons for most of what I do. Reasons are bullshit most of the time... just politics and narrative. It's why planning and even Machiavelliansm are crucial skills: you won't act for any reason at all if you don't plan.
/r/TheRedPill09/06/14 02:33 AM
4

They don't show it in the show but he's also a rapist. When not in power he seduces or pays women but when he had the capacity for force himself on the prettiest woman in the area, he did so.
/r/TheRedPill09/06/14 02:25 AM
12

Ha! I saw a girl on facebook say the same thing. Seriously though, how fucked can you be to get wet for someone that hunts down and kills women for basically no reason at all? That's like a guy getting off on Lorena Bobbitt. Fucking RP man.
/r/TheRedPill09/06/14 02:22 AM
2

It might have originally happened but this is old enough that this specific retelling is completely fabricated.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/14 07:04 AM
2

In the short-term, they're bullies with all of the social backing. In the long term, we live in a divorce rape culture.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/14 04:45 PM
2

That is what they believe, aye. That there is no patriarchy to dismantle makes this equivalent to never ever helping men but there's no easy way to get a feminist to even address that possibility with an open mind.
/r/MensRights05/06/14 02:24 AM
1

What I've seen is that unilateral violence is mostly even between man->woman and woman->man. Reciprocal violence made up the other 50%. IIRC women initiated something like 70% of reciprocal violence though.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/14 02:04 AM
6

Used to be MR rebuffed attempts by new members to work with feminists on feminism's terms since that has for decades meant nothing gets done for men and boys. Now? Those comments don't get lambasted. Fucking shame.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 05:10 PM
1

Wait. Shit. Did that start feminism's universal appeal to authority/oppression olympics?
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 04:54 PM
2

There's also the 50th law, though I haven't yet read it.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 09:20 AM
2

The facts are that women are safer than men both as victims and perpetrators: courts are ludicrously lenient and most men won't even defend themselves against a woman for rational fear of being further victimized by white knights inside and outside the law. Can't tell women this but it does mean you can dismiss them when they generalize instead of focus on specific events.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 08:22 AM
1

I'd bet money on exactly this.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 08:14 AM
2

Do those fucking school officials really not know that children believe their fathers to be mighty?
/r/MensRights04/06/14 08:13 AM
9

Tangent but wtf? the master’s tools will never dismantle the master’s house. That makes no sense.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 06:36 AM
1

Some have that mentality of "loving themselves as they are" I find that these guys add a good vibe to mellow parties.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 06:31 AM
5

One of us. One of us...
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 06:25 AM
2

Also with health.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/14 07:32 AM
5

Sadness is a habit. Happiness is a habit.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/14 05:45 AM
2

White knights are the clueless of the romantic world: they adhere to ideals with devotion even when it's irrational of them to do so.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/14 05:44 AM
5

I use the word "supplicating" even though "too nice" is functionally identical. Gotta avoid those cached thoughts.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/14 05:34 AM
7

Both of which can be almost completely offset by making more money on average than short men.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/14 05:33 AM
4

Yup, young men are more fertile. It doesn't really matter all that much since you can just fuck more or use modern technology, unlike with women where their fertility decreases then ceases.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/14 05:31 AM
0

Plus at that point they can take greater risks because they have a husband in his career prime to fall back on.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/14 05:30 AM
1

What is necessary as part of the transitional phase? How can goods and services be distributed without prices or a coercive central agency? I don't know. I'm not a communist. I advocate market socialism. You lose almost all of the coercion of capitalism while retaining competition and efficient price calculation.
/r/TheRedPill03/06/14 05:18 AM
4

Without making any of my own judgments: few dog owners harbor hostility toward dogs but dogs are not treated as equals.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 04:43 AM
1

:DDDDD
/r/TheRedPill02/06/14 04:39 AM
1

Feminism the rhetoric masks feminism the ideology and feminism the movement.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/14 04:05 AM
2

It's good to recognize how much cooler I am than you. I'm happy to see you making peace with your role.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/14 03:07 AM
3

That would mean that she's in a good mood so she's projecting good qualities on others or just focusing on the good.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 10:23 PM
1

If by counterattack you mean "break narrative; enter one where you're favored".
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 10:23 PM
1

I don't remember specifically where I read it but I thought Margaery did fuck at least one woman? It's still projection of Cersei's part since she doesn't have any reason to believe this though.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 10:21 PM
2

I just realized that throwing disparate pay grade professions together when manufacturing a pay gap statistic does not account for opportunity cost or the cost of education. There's just so many layers of bullshit to unravel!
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 06:51 PM
-1

coercive central agency are doomed to fail Anything with this is as far from communist as possible. Libertarianism is more communist than a coercive central agency, and that's saying something. But that's not really us disagreeing over the actual world, just definitions.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 06:50 PM
7

This is good. Break narrative and throw it back on them. If they aren't green then they'll have something trite to throw back again but it does move the discussion further out of their comfort zone.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 08:42 AM
10

I disagree. I only ever see that retort from people that are uncomfortable with the questions you raise because it casts doubt on some belief they won't let themselves doubt. They aren't openly trolling or cleanly shutting down the conversation, they're saying to everyone watching, themselves and you: "You are so wrong that your beliefs aren't even worth considering." It's a silencing tactic that bolsters the ego. To have a constructive conversation, you need some way to lower their heresy defen…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 08:41 AM
4

Copied from above in case you aren't rereading the thread: This is the logical but TERRIBLE advice. Negating a narrative is accepting it as valid and just disagreeing. You have to reframe into territory that favors your position. You are advocating only a step above "yuh-huh. nuh-uh. yUH-huh!" even though are you 100% correct. You just can not depend on ANYONE that says "it's not our job to educate you" to actually engage in constructive discussion. That is not what they are there for and in no …
/r/MensRights01/06/14 08:21 AM
8

This is the logical but TERRIBLE advice. Negating a narrative is accepting it as valid and just disagreeing. You have to reframe into territory that favors your position. You are advocating only a step above "yuh-huh. nuh-uh. yUH-huh!" even though are you 100% correct. You just can not depend on ANYONE that says "it's not our job to educate you" to actually engage in constructive discussion. That is not what they are there for and in no way are they going to ascend to that level when they are an…
/r/MensRights01/06/14 08:18 AM
3

13 years is on the high end. I take it she's specializing in something requiring a ton more training? Looking at the numbers, suddenly women dominating pediatrics makes sense.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 07:08 AM
3

I'm not a libertarian in the U.S. sense but your extrapolation is wrong: dismantling the state does not necessarily mean devolving into might-makes-right. There are other ways of organizing human populations than endowing a social entity (aka its functionaries) with a monopoly on justified force.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 07:03 AM
1

It's kind of like pure communism being a proven failure: shit never actually happened but the rhetoric is useful for the big players on both sides so almost everyone plays along.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 07:00 AM
1

Suits impress chicks only if the chick doesn't see a lot of men in suits. If she's from money, or she mingles in high society a suit will not impress her the same it will some other chick still not desensitized to seeing suits. Makes sense. Those women are also going to know more reliable indicators of wealth and class so flip flops and jeans won't impress them either. Maybe if someone tailors their game for that specific class of women. But it seems like unless you are actually of the 1% (or ma…
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 06:57 AM
2

you will only be bumped to first class if you're dressed well Not applicable here but I was bumped when I was a child. For all I know I was well-dressed for a child but it's dubious. Does this happen often?
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 06:49 AM
2

those awful rolling briefcases with wheels Hah I was just thinking that today. Glad my sense of style is getting out of atrocious.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 06:47 AM
7

More often then not, they come off as creepy or socially unaware. IF you can't play the power game called social interaction -when its rather clear that our entire lives are shaped by it- you're demonstrating that you either lack either consciousness or intelligence (particularly EQ).but This is what is communicated but not always what is happening. To add to the list of underlying causes: some betas and even some women are not incompetent so much as harbor grossly misguided ethics. To a suffici…
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 03:22 AM
2

All true but when a person describes someone as nice it almost always really means that they don't know anything substantial about them but want to say something positive, such as when trying to reject a guy without hurting him. Here, women don't know Max well because when a woman uses an emotional tampon like Max, she does not reciprocate. He's also boring to women so they don't even listen when he does speak.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 03:14 AM
11

It's basic tingle theory with a lot of fluff to disarm beta ego defense.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 03:08 AM
1

A promiscuous man is more likely than a non-promiscuous man to have promiscuous sons. Promiscuous men sleep around more, having more children in total. For a woman to have a slutty father's son is to have half of her genetic material impregnating many women.
/r/MensRights31/05/14 11:18 PM
1

On a second thought - who exactly do they mimic then? One of my hypotheses is that women sexual select for men that other women sexually select for. Circular but that's fine - it just needs a catalyst cause to run wild. Like peacock tails on peacocks or large breasts on women, they are primary for competing in the sexual market atop natural selection and secondarily and by proxy for natural selection: peacock tails signalling sufficient fitness to throw resources away and large breasts signallin…
/r/TheRedPill31/05/14 10:44 PM
1

I dont think any women is low risk enough to consider marriage. Likely true of you but this all depends on the weights a person gives to various outcomes. FWIW your conclusion is also true of me but there are married men who made that choice rationally.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/14 07:27 PM
14

Women seem to take it way the fuck more seriously. Little boys are told to man the fuck up when they are called names or even physically bullied. Little girls get authority to deal with it or use covert or social means to strike back. Maybe this is why women raised by men seem less neurotic? They learned to deal with bullshit instead of add more to the pile.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/14 07:25 PM
1

My mom tried to but I don't think she really understood how to get from her intuition of what makes men attractive to actually explaining it to a boy. Unfortunately my dad was barely any more articulate even to himself; despite walking the alpha walk he talked the beta talk and actually believed it, at least when it comes to how women ought to be treated.
/r/askTRP31/05/14 07:18 PM
9

I think she's actually right about how most women see unstereotypically geeky guys. If they're going to date a geek then they want to accessorize a geek, not a person with geeky hobbies. That means you have to enjoy all of the classic geek activities like superhero comics, star trek and fixing computers. Actually geeky girls don't have this problem with geeky guys. They might do the same for non-geeks though.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/14 09:52 PM
1

https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/bitstream/handle/10012/6958/Yeung_Amy.pdf?sequence=1
/r/TheRedPill30/05/14 07:43 PM
1

And he’s right to be embarrassed, the emails display the worst of the ‘bro’ mentality that continues to contribute to the marginalization of women in Silicon Valley. Author outs himself as a moron. More at eleven. Because no, there is no "'bro' mentality" in silicon valley.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/14 05:16 AM
7

I must concede, tho, that the main difference between Alpha and betas is the following one: women want to be mistreated as objects by Alpha, while betas want to mistreat women. These two arrows are opposed and, what's more, betas want to mistreat women because women want to be mistreated by Alpha, but not by betas. That's bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/14 05:12 AM
12

Plus it's really easy to claim negs are "verbal abuse of women". All women without exception are special, they must be treated with respect at all times and are to be worshipped by men, in case you didn't get the femmimemo. Anything less is abuse, especially if a woman's feeeeels are somehow hurt by a man. I'd like to take this time to point out that this is supported by at least one study: people (men and women) cannot tell the difference between egalitarian and misogynistic men - they are both…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/14 05:10 AM
1

Good question.
/r/askTRP29/05/14 03:33 AM
1

...maybe. Shit, what are you implying, here? That my post-sex persona is so on-key that the person they meet the next time, before the sex, is turning them off?! I;m not him but he could be implying that post-sex you seem like a long-term catch so she wants to rewind to before fucking you so she can go through the provider script aka not fucking until the 3rd date or so, so you don't think she's a slut. Obviously doesn't work since you aren't retarded but hope springs eternal.
/r/askTRP29/05/14 03:29 AM
10

It's more like 70% male and while the userbase skews to low SMV, it isn't that pronounced.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/14 02:27 AM
1

evolution dictates that basketball players will continue getting better Only insofar as basketball stars outbreed non-basketball stars or good basketball players outbreed bad basketball players. Condoms seem to have drastically reduced that advantage.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/14 02:26 AM
5

I suspect the rearing of adolescents is trained rather than innate since most fathers in the West today suck at it too.
/r/TheRedPill27/05/14 02:20 AM
1

even being discussed here Pretty sure it's entirely because feminists are blaming this subreddit and the manosphere in general.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/14 09:16 PM
1

it seems like he was missing that person in his life that could translate reality to him Yup. His father gave him The Secret.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/14 08:37 PM
1

FB picture weight Funny to think about how many nanograms such a thing actually weighs.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/14 08:26 PM
16

This feels a little contrived but I think there's something to develop from this theory.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 11:53 AM
5

I already know a few answers to this one, but I'm curious to hear your take on it. What would the advice be? If I were giving this advice to a woman: Be fit, pleasant and generally reduce your man's psychic strain. Don't flirt with other men or put yourself in compromising positions. If your interest is motherhood then show that you'd be a good mother. Recognize that you don't really want him to change into a more "stable" or "respectable" man; you want to want him to be your perception of socia…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 11:37 AM
2

You literally CANNOT make this up. Honestly? This is exactly what I'd imagine if I thought about them at all. This behavior is ubiquitous among feminists. They've been doing it against MRAs for years now and many events over the years confirm that even famous feminists -no anonymity - do this as a standard procedure to generate sympathy. It isn't even interesting by itself. But an admin actually admitting it? I never expected that!
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 08:43 AM
3

men's rights activist
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 08:36 AM
9

It's a bit more complicated than that. He isn't selfish so much as short-sighted: he's unaware that there are consequences to handing power to feminists and consequences to the cultural changes feminism effects.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 08:34 AM
2

It's sad that he is so ignorant of human relationship dynamics. If he really wanted her to be happier, he'd be less of a pushover so she'd have more attractive men in her life. Instead he did the obvious but wrong thing.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 08:28 AM
14

Superficially it seems that way because most people can't tell the difference between TRP and PUA but there is a huge difference: in TRP, shortcuts are derided and PUA (and Cosmo) are all about shortcuts.The first advice to anyone seeking to gain control over their life is to lift weights because it comes with a host of physical and mental benefits. Cosmo doesn't tell women how to attract and keep the men they want because that advice is not pleasant.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 08:17 AM
8

Others have responded about how almost perfectly anti-red pill this man's actions were so I'll focus on the context of your post: Those people are fools and should be disregarded by everyone, including themselves and you. They literally cannot be more wrong yet they speak.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 04:34 AM
7

The difference is that TRP would say that all women are inherently bad and try to use you so you should just manipulate them instead They'd say that people as a whole will never care about men as they do women so the MRM's tactic of appealing to fairness and egalitarianism is useless. Some also just consider all complaints to be whining. The former is at least possible (though I have never seen sufficient evidence) but the latter is just moronic. There are men in TRP that hate women but the endo…
/r/MensRights25/05/14 03:54 AM
19

You going to respond to the cited studies that aren't through an interest group or just the one you can dismiss offhand for potential political bias?
/r/MensRights25/05/14 12:48 AM
5

He's just rephrasing "you can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it drink"
/r/TheRedPill24/05/14 11:09 PM
30

It's actually closer to 50% than 40%. The trick is not to use sources that are heavily biased, like yours. Not all bias is people being emotional. Here, you are using "justice" (crime, presumably) statistics. It ought to be immediately obvious to you, though it actually isn't, that men vastly underreport their domestic violence victimization. Among the many reasons including shame and a complete lack of social support, there's the reality that a man calling the police on a woman for beating him …
/r/MensRights24/05/14 10:46 PM
19

I reckon it's less about what feminism added to women's educations and more about what it took away, in true sociopath manner: girls today don't learn from adult men or women how they need to act to get an attractive, loving husband because feminism made it taboo to discuss feminine failings and how to please men instead of basely manipulate them.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/14 10:06 PM
31

In societies where men are actually privileged, a female witnesses, even to their own rape, are considered less than a male witness. Here in the West it's opposite except this bias is implicit instead of encoded in law.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/14 09:53 PM
10

To the best of my knowledge, 2x isn't (or wasn't) particularly censorious. But now that it's a default I expect feminists to work harder to radicalize the sub.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 08:19 PM
22

mostly they dislike MRAs and certainly the subreddit lacks an MRA tilt
/r/MensRights24/05/14 08:15 PM
19

yup. keyword is "credible". Internet threats are 99%+ trashtalk and therefore not credible
/r/MensRights24/05/14 08:15 PM
2

I wish I had enough for a full post. I only saw a couple of instances of my family's matriarch overtly controlling but they were at least extremely similar: isolate and make sure everyone else (even their spouse, in one case) does the same. She's more Machiavellian than you might expect since a girl's manipulation isn't enough unless she drops an f-bomb. It takes a woman's.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/14 08:05 PM
1

Thanks for the insight.
/r/TheRedPill24/05/14 07:57 PM
3

It is sort of amazing how much temporary SMV raises when you are in a bunch of pictures with attractive women.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/14 05:54 AM
7

My linguistics is rudimentary but it seems like a quirk of English that we attribute causality like that: "All of the good men are taken." We think "if good man -> taken" even though the actual meaning is just sets: the set of good men is a subset of taken men. This research of course shows that the actual causality is "if taken -> good man". I wonder if we can fuck with this further? "All good women are chaste."* We think "if you are a good woman then you will choose to be chaste" but it could …
/r/TheRedPill23/05/14 05:53 AM
2

political theory ... Women are so illogical not even education can redeem them, it's hilarious and yet, disappointing too. I read shit like this and wonder WTF people supposedly learn in political science and shit. Do they like not even touch on the basics of how to manipulate people when teaching the science (or "science") of people manipulating each other?
/r/TheRedPill23/05/14 05:39 AM
12

this is what TRP is about beyond sexual strategy, opening your mind to all manner of madness, it's a fucking jungle out there and shit is crazy This is one of the few places where I encounter radically different opinions from people that can actually argue back.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/14 05:35 AM
1

Risk-aversion works well when risks are real. In the civilized world, very little can incite a man to murder you. It's still fairly easy to become ostracized but there are so many people so disconnected that there is always another clique to join. So yes, ignore your inner beta: he's a dumbass unless you're dealing with a gang or warlord.
/r/TheRedPill23/05/14 03:32 AM
5

The source of the friendzoners-are-rapists meme, as far as I can tell, was Jezebel putting a hit piece out on beta orbiters so women feel justified in abusing them.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 06:50 AM
5

The technical explanations out of the way, it means you are being censored by the reddit admins. Don't worry though: they believe themselves to be open-minded and pro-free speech.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 06:35 AM
1

Thank you.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 06:31 AM
3

I'd like to add that it takes some practice to look at women as impassionately as you do men so holding them to the same standard is difficult at first.
/r/askTRP22/05/14 04:40 AM
1

When delegating, are women appreciably less dependable?
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 04:36 AM
3

The way modern matriarchies work (extended families headed by a dominant woman), everyone falls in line or is ostracized. I highly suspect the women are under more pressure to obey than are the men but that may be because men are almost always slightly aloof; the matriarch controls most of the men through their ties to the women (wives, mothers, sisters, cousins). Sadly I don't know how modern patriarchies work because I've never been around one for more than a couple of days, as a child without…
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 04:35 AM
4

Voting is the use of proxy force to exert ones will on the collective in an equal but not necessarily equitable way. It keeps people from outright attacking each other. Crucially, it gives the illusion of choice so people more easily learn to ignore the grossly unfair constraints and impositions put upon them by people will tens of thousands to millions of times more power than is granted by a vote. Suffrage will never be delegated to the people that make the best decisions because sociopaths an…
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 04:30 AM
3

Most people will give you anything that costs them little, including secrets, and all you have to do is ask. No trickery is needed.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 04:12 AM
2

How the fuck does an MBA not negotiate their salary? Sounds like a solid test of how good a student they actually were. It's a mistake to attribute everything to biology or culture, It's a shame academic and popular culture completely throw out the possibility of biological differences. Although it is clear that university admissions tests under predict females' abilities They know for a fact that female teachers give female students better grades than male students for identical work. Or they s…
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 04:03 AM
2

A decade ago I got in an argument with a feminist over the definition of the word chauvinism. I was right, obviously, but that should have been a red flag for me.
/r/TheRedPill22/05/14 03:36 AM
4

Aye. After a certain point - and this is pretty low point - happiness comes from within. External factors change the highs and lows but baseline happiness is learned and can be trained. No amount of attention can make an unhappy person happy for long so it becomes an addiction cycle. They need more and more and more attention so even maintaining a high level is unsatisfying. I reckon this contributes to female depression but I think the main factor is the lack of strong men causing women anxiety…
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 05:11 AM
1

IIRC he blew up and was honest about his intentions vis-a-vis manipulating feminists for sex and profit. Probably ended his career.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 02:12 AM
2

Somewhere along the line, most women learn the basics of tribal politics while most men do not. Possibly our respective strategies don't work equally well in civilized life. Like, a man cannot be vindictive because he will suffer severe negative consequences but a woman can because, aside from the substantial pussy pass, the law and society care more about punches than rumors even though the latter are usually much worse.
/r/TheRedPill21/05/14 02:06 AM
0

Equality an fairness are the result of stability. This is not remotely true. Which timeline are you from? In mine, the Dark Ages lasted centuries with very little "external" change. The lord-peasant relationship was grossly unequal and only sporadically fair. Stability is the result of effective authority. It would be interesting to see strong evidence in favor of one of our theories. Cognitive Dissonance. If you deal with such things as "optimism" and "pessimism" or describe any of your thought…
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 02:51 AM
1

I haven't encountered any better in development or associated departments (QA, devops, etc) that I can personally verify but ostensibly several women at my company are competent. The only two I've directly worked with are not though.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 02:43 AM
1

reddit tip: Use the greater-than sign to quote and put extra newlines between stanzas.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/14 02:41 AM
1

You let slip one of their names.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/14 08:19 AM
3

So gender roles are borne of economic dynamics born from sex differences. Men violently thugging, seeking to dominate everything - but especially women - is a feminist fabrication the third wavers save for discussions instead of PR pieces. The second wavers were more honest and internally consistent. Here's a starting point: individual liberty in an economy where cooperation isn't crucial causes economic inequality because free exchange means that the most useful party does disproportionately be…
/r/TheRedPill19/05/14 08:16 AM
11

People say that but I know more real female nerds than fake ones. It's the fake ones that are attention whores so everyone sees them. They're also usually cuter since they're manipulating instead of just existing in nerdy pursuits, a culture justifiably known for poor personal hygiene and presentation.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/14 07:30 AM
15

Gotta find a woman intent on doing something meaningful with her life instead of spinning the wheels of mortality in greater and greater contrived achievement in popularity.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/14 07:27 AM
31

Why would the surviving men be trying to kill each other? Each has literally millions of women that want them. Organisms fight when they occupy the same niche but usually not too much if they aren't resource-constrained. Is food and water enough of a problem that even men fight when they can easily get many women to give them resources in exchange for attention?
/r/TheRedPill19/05/14 07:23 AM
1

Absolutely. I wish I had answers with my analysis!
/r/TheRedPill19/05/14 06:11 AM
3

Unfortunately there is a strong correlation between number of sex partners (for women) and divorce. Since divorce is extremely costly to a man, a man must be extremely careful if he chooses to get married. That means discounting all women with many sex partners. This wouldn't be a problem if marriage were rationally handled but it's not: the male penalties are still as high as when a woman was fucked without a husband.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/14 12:06 AM
4

People spit on tradition until they are faced with marriage or parenthood. Playing around is fine until it's permanent. The mistake so many make is to believe that their choices don't effect their future selves.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/14 12:03 AM
4

Also apparently girls can't tell that fake tans look atricious.
/r/TheRedPill19/05/14 12:00 AM
0

To elaborate: this is literally true. Research has shown that people believe an egalitarian man to be a misogynist unless he actually explicitly claims to be egalitarian. In contrast, benevolently sexist men are viewed more favorably. If women can't tell the difference between being treated fairly and being hated then they've never experienced hatred.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/14 11:23 PM
3

The difference between someone with 120 IQ and 170 IQ is very small relative to the gap between someone with 120 IQ and 70 IQ. Are you sure? I don't know enough to be certain but my assumption was that while the 120-70 gap is noticeable to almost everyone, that's because almost everyone is above 70. To someone with a 170 iq, the 120-170 gap would appear just as large.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/14 11:12 PM
11

Gotta have someone to be the group punching bag. If she did start shaping up then her "friends" would push her back into bad habits. She needs to fix her life without dubious support.
/r/TheRedPill18/05/14 10:49 PM
2

Waylandyr has my meaning. I admit my wording was ambiguous.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 09:18 AM
2

The solipsism model applies: if your economic class is above them then you're a shitlord. Equal or below then economic class isn't as important, shitlord!
/r/MensRights18/05/14 02:18 AM
1

Does it matter? Why does this dynamic displease you?
/r/MensRights18/05/14 01:44 AM
7

I like these articles. They help destroy my faith in humanity. Experts advising against male babysitters on extremely dubious grounds? This helps destroy my bias to believe that authority conveys competence.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 01:42 AM
3

It's one of the few overlaps between the motivations of both feminism and religious extremism.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 01:40 AM
3

Women are the only oppressed minority in the history of humankind with a higher quality of life than their oppressors. Yes, feminists are stupid enough to believe that this exception does not bare examination: it's self-evident.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 01:36 AM
2

A clear case of ad hoc hypothesis: no matter what the facts, privilege goes to rich white able-bodied neurotypical Christian cis men, and all subsets thereof.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 01:35 AM
2

Well no, he'd be out on bail then he'd plead.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 01:32 AM
1

He worked himself into offense because he believes that harm to someone else should be harm to himself. A misguided solidarity with women, especially here.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 08:52 PM
20

There's no other way to interpret the hamster than to read between the lines. There's no straight talk there.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 08:40 PM
16

This is because false accusations are instinctive power plays and the weak don't instinctively make power plays against the strong.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/14 04:39 AM
-1

I agree that shadow banning for "brigading" (real or imagined) is bullshit but shadow banning isn't all bad. It's good for making botting more difficult.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 06:38 AM
3

So they talk down about other men they're attracted to, in an effort to convince themselves and others that they're not actually attracted to these other men. But they are. Be wary when your woman talks down about other men. That means that she's noticed him and he has her attention. That means she's trying to rationalize and find a reason why she's not attracted, because she's feeling attraction. Men that a woman is not attracted to are invisible. They don't exist in her world. She barely notic…
/r/TheRedPill15/05/14 05:53 AM
14

Not even time-wasting, I've felt dirty after sex (I'm male). She wasn't attractive and I wouldn't have done it sober. Still not rape though (sadly, not obvious to feminists).
/r/TheRedPill15/05/14 02:05 AM
1

You can tell the author has never actually talked to an equalist before because she thinks "reverse-sexism" is a thing to anyone but feminists. Falsehood in art.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 01:44 AM
1

This may be perfect.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/14 05:00 AM
6

/r/mensrants maybe?
/r/TheRedPill13/05/14 02:43 AM
2

Well that's depressing.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/14 05:50 AM
1

More on #4: people WANT you to start shit. That's what initiative and bravery are. Making drama is not usually desired by itself but you can't improve the world without pissing people off.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/14 05:48 AM
0

If you don't show basic human nurturing then the people close to you will pick up on you being a sociopath, which can fuck up your ability to seduce them.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/14 05:46 AM
2

If done right it's extremely effective. It's reciprocation. When you give someone a gift, they feel the strong need to give you one in return. Salesmen will give someone a small gift then ask to show you their product or survey-takers will give a small gift then ask you to take their survey. It's even more effective than outright paying for surveys. Naturally betas do this all wrong. First, they give gifts to people callous to them: women, especially hot women. Second, they pretend that the gift…
/r/TheRedPill12/05/14 05:42 AM
9

Too much trust somewhere. I'm not sure if it's psychiatrists, medical doctors overstepping their bounds, drug companies cutting deals or advocating, or what. But somewhere, some entity or entities did not deserve trust and yet parents and teachers trusted them to drug children.
/r/TheRedPill12/05/14 04:34 AM
1

I couldn't read all of it. This is what /r/cringe should be.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/14 10:12 PM
2

Ah, right. Newfags conflating all memes as image macros messing it up for everybody else. Thanks for clarifying.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/14 07:15 PM
3

Yeah I meant that it will catch on.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/14 07:14 PM
1

My bad.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/14 07:12 PM
4

My interpretation: Their examples of professions seem really off. Like, middle managers aren't CEOs lacking social opportunities. If we ignore their examples of professions then most (TRP) betas we see in the wild are deltas: Alpha = TRP Alpha - in upper class Beta = TRP Alpha - in lower class Gamma = TRP Alpha - "rogue" or whatever Delta = TRP Beta - standard Omega = TRP Beta - neckbeard In this mapping, all Psychological is with respect to women. Lots of deltas are betas or gammas except in ho…
/r/TheRedPill11/05/14 08:40 AM
1

All that social structure around them that a gamma lacks.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/14 08:26 AM
9

Not sure what you are asking so I'll answer twice: A meme is life an information lifeform. It lives in minds and travels by word, text, image, etc. The meme here is the notion that women act badly because they are not held accountable. I have seen it more and more recently so I suspect it will blow up in a few months. Why I think it will blow up: MRAs will likely latch onto the idea and feminists will respond that the patriarchy is why women aren't held accountable. The back-and-forth could hit …
/r/TheRedPill11/05/14 03:12 AM
7

Projection is extremely motherfucking common. Almost all of modern feminism's statements about men are straight projection of what women and especially female feminists do.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/14 02:47 AM
5

Also, seeing as society will hold men to account and make them take responsibility for fucking up, there's some kind of cultural insurance. Whereas if a woman changes her mind or decides not to make good on her promises, she is free to shirk them in such a way, potentially fucking you over, and nobody will bat an eyelid. I suspect this meme will have an impact in a few months.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/14 02:45 AM
2

This sounds obvious to me now and I question why I am making this thread Obvious in retrospect.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/14 02:33 AM
4

The same is true of me to a lesser degree. I didn't even realize how stifling PC adherence was until here.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/14 02:31 AM
3

There's some outright whining but I have difficulty separating the whining from my bias against men complaining.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/14 02:29 AM
0

That is what you said so it's good that he said you said it. Said.
/r/TheRedPill11/05/14 12:47 AM
18

It's a mix. Most MRAs are bluepill. Some are not.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/14 08:26 PM
1

Wow.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/14 06:34 PM
1

Majority of. I shouldn't have used such an abused word.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 06:33 PM
2

Too much focus on the fall of the nuclear family. The nuclear family has always been a disaster. The extended family and close associates living as a family unit is much more stable. The nuclear family is just some shit we threw together in an economic upturn since a) we had the wealth for it and b) it's a reststop in the rise of extremely individualism. People here don't attack their assumptions enough. No, being better at this than 90% of humanity is not enough: we can do far better. Always be…
/r/TheRedPill09/05/14 05:54 AM
2

I don't particularly care that most here regard sociopathy has beneficial for alphas but I agree with you on the ideal alpha, for myself. I also agree that fuck (most of) neoliberalism.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/14 05:26 AM
1

Rad, thanks.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:00 AM
6

Fucking identity politics. Somehow acceptance became exclusion.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/14 03:52 AM
1

If your premise is correct then it's actually worse. These 90:10 populations are a subset of the total relevant population. Most men don't care how things work either.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/14 03:49 AM
4

All of the girls I knew in college that started intending to major in CS switched to something softer in their first year. I get that CS61A is a weed-out course but it's also incredibly fucking interesting.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/14 03:48 AM
2

And who told you that? A feminist?
/r/TheRedPill09/05/14 03:41 AM
5

My thoughts: the language here is vague. "Being told what to do" can merely mean that he spoke without a rising inflection in his voice. It could mean he would beat her when she disobeyed. Likely it means he made confident requests of her and didn't break frame when she shit tests him by ingenuously refusing.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/14 03:38 AM
2

Some of the RP ideas work for gay men since they do still interact with women. The basic idea behind raising SMV is true of gay men as well even though the gay community already disseminates that information. I'd guess that understanding fag hags helps young gay men save their time and energy.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/14 03:28 AM
2

The whole "omg gaslighting" craze most of a year ago was totally projection. Gaslighting is heavily employed by women. The only men that really gaslight are dark triad. They're fucking most women so most women would encounter it (apex fallacy ftw) but most men don't mentally push women enough, let alone gaslight them.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/14 03:19 AM
6

On the plus side, Eliot's mother is cast as a bad person and Eliot is cast as romantically broken due to her parents.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/14 03:16 AM
7

I let them know that if they get pregnant, I'll pay for an abortion Scam: fake pregnancy to get money for abortion. Buy expensive purse. Show off purse to friends while discussing how stupid men are.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/14 03:12 AM
3

Close male friendship is dead for most men in our culture but it serves a purpose.
/r/TheRedPill09/05/14 03:08 AM
3

So they're literally disenfranchising the majority of the white male student body? Pendulums do eventually swing back, you know.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 04:46 AM
1

Sadly, racists are rarely that obvious in mixed company. Back when this sub was being invaded* by white rights people, you couldn't always tell when someone was being racist or just a bit clumsy with their writing. * I am being unkind with my word choice but I don't like them and I can't think of a better word for "briefly often frequented".
/r/MensRights08/05/14 04:42 AM
14

There's this smugness now that I can't quite place, and it exists firmly in feminist groups, or sometimes just groups of women who would not immediately identify as feminist. What little I have directly experienced of all-female groups (I'm male) shows this too. I have some conjecture I'd like to share. You would know better than me if I'm far off base or not. In out culture it is understood that women are better than men. Most women are socially above most men even though some men are socially …
/r/MensRights08/05/14 04:37 AM
1

His wording precludes the possibility that he is speaking of her actions making her subhuman because he says "if this subhuman female is guilty" (bolding is mine). He does not say "if this female is guilty, she's subhuman and then I hope [...]". These sentences do differ in meaning even if you and 14 other people can't tell. It turns out that he did not intend that meaning but I can't preclude racism just because I find it distasteful. And no, I'm not protecting her. I'm determining if I should …
/r/MensRights08/05/14 03:22 AM
2

Thanks.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 03:13 AM
-11

I originally downvoted you for racism but your history is very anti-racist. When you call her subhuman, you do so in the context of possible guilt, not definite guilt. Do you mean that she would be subhuman if guilty?
/r/MensRights06/05/14 05:36 AM
4

While women are rarely the people doing the approaching, I'm pretty sure that women also respond better to "I have a girlfriend" than "I'm not interested." They'd take it better but unfortunately this would make them more interested in you.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 04:21 AM
1

An excellent story about bullying and superpowers that touches on how school administrations protect bullies.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 04:10 AM
8

Lifting.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/14 03:44 AM
1

Rich men are better off. Pretty sure poor (/ugly/short/boring) men aren't technically men so technically the author is correct.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/14 05:14 AM
2

1 More women in the workforce HAS yielded a stronger economy -- the gains of which are almost exclusively had by the upper class. More women in the workforce means more labor competition means lower wages. 2 Other research shows the exact opposite. I don't know enough to judge. 3 ... and has fought tooth-and-nail to maintain existing discrimination and create new discrimination whenever it helps women. 4 Trivial. Much bigger is the benefit to non-wolf alphas. 5 Yes. 6 Wow. 7 They actually did do…
/r/TheRedPill05/05/14 05:11 AM
1

I agree with most of what you said. However, I do not think that you can really measure the housekeeping and childcare costs on paper. If you aren't going to compare dislike things in some way then there's no conversation. Rate it at completely useless or worth more than any paid labor. It becomes a political question and political questions are resolved by force - either overt or implied. Not only is there the lost opportunity cost in the woman's job... but also the man is able to invest more t…
/r/TheRedPill05/05/14 03:23 AM
1

They aren't earning that money though. Housekeeping and childcare only amounts to about as much as a full income for poor people and poor women work. Hell, many middle class families even have maids. They aren't very expensive if you aren't a complete slob. If the wife had the potential for a career comparable to her husband's then I agree with you. Her opportunity cost is not insubstantial. That is incredibly rare however: men vastly outnumber women in almost all of the most productive fields. …
/r/TheRedPill05/05/14 02:37 AM
6

Leto Atreides I was the first non-rapist male ever because the Bene Gesserit are all women.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 06:11 AM
1

Focus on changing your external stimuli. vacuu mentioned nofap and paleo, which are good, but you can also change your environment by removing distractions from your work desk, emptying your fridge of shit food, etc. Most of willpower is focus control and most of focus control is avoiding distractions in the first place.
/r/askTRP04/05/14 04:00 AM
3

Bears don't do rhetoric. Their culture's pre-Classical.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 07:38 AM
3

That's the thing, modern marriage no longer stabilizes families. In fact, it actively de-stabilizes them. It's like no one with any kind of real power has ever heard of game theory or economics.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 07:37 AM
1

Shit, feminist definition of rape adjusted for men (bullshit + envelopment is rape) and men are raped as much as women IN THE GENERAL POPULATION. Prison rape is a whole other thing on top of that.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 07:36 AM
2

Men are and have always been at greater risk than women. Feminists bring up mass rape following a conquest like oh damn see how oppressed women are but the fucking men were all killed. Then they say being raped is worse than dying because you ain't around to feel it... fuck them telling rape victims to suicide. Heartless hoes.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 07:35 AM
2

You can listen to her on the character of a woman but do not listen to a word she says about what makes a woman want a man. Unless she's a rare RP woman, she will feed you BS. Yes, even to her son. Myself, my mother only started giving me good advice when I was old enough to not listen to her anymore. When I was younger she gave me the kind of advice my female peers today give me. Fucking shame.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 07:28 AM
0

Oh I getcha now.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 07:22 AM
-2

Yeah it hits them in the ego. Fact is only rare people are competent enough to attack TRP just because it harms their livelihood. Everyone else is just reacting to teh feelz.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 05:45 AM
3

Don't these lawmakers realize that in 5 years these women are going to be jobless? Or that they'll not be competent enough, putting people's life at risk? If we were a rational oligarchy like China, maybe.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 05:43 AM
1

I honestly think that women who study engineering understand men better and are less of a cunt. I've seen this too. It's not perfect but the only MRA woman I personally know is a serious engineer. As much as the pussypass has undoubtedly helped her, I wouldn't be at all surprised if she could've succeeded as a man. Not as nice an internship (holy shit that was cushy) but still some good shit.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 05:41 AM
5

The only people I have seen that have had breakdowns have all been women Men might also hide it better. We know damn well no one gives a damn if we have a hard time. A woman can broadcast her difficulty and no one despises her for it.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 05:38 AM
2

They derive no reproductive fitness from it and it's hard. Male engineers at least can get a kid or two out of a wall crasher. A non-ugly woman can always find a man to partially or fully support them.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 05:37 AM
17

misogyny "Higher" but still incredibly low. Fact is very very very few men hate women. There's a lot of other disparaging beliefs but hatred is maybe 1% of the male population. I doubt it's that high. Now feminine hatred of men? That shit's common. It's socially endorsed by the women's lobby feminism. I know several women that hate men and not a single man that hates women.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 05:35 AM
1

Gotta embrace memetics.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 05:31 AM
15

You racist motherfucker. You should be ashamed of your self.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 05:30 AM
-1

The natural rate is more like 50% actually. Still with women strongly favoring economically useless degrees.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 05:26 AM
1

I think any person that's book smart without a hardwired social handicap like autism can become red pill. That's basically Nietzsche.
/r/askTRP01/05/14 12:57 AM
1

I don't believe everyone knows they are playing a game, so I don't know if that changes your paradigm of "everyone manipulates" or not. Very few people let themselves admit that they are playing a game but no, that doesn't change my belief that everyone manipulates. Most people just do it by instinct and are varying degrees of incompetent because of this. Though now that I think about it, people on the autism spectrum actually may not manipulate. I'm too low-arousal to even contemplate the idea …
/r/TheRedPill30/04/14 09:46 AM
1

Eh. I personally know three Machiavellians (including myself) and none score very high in psychopathy nor orbit better Machiavellians*. All are looking out primarily for themselves but highly value productive friendships. I have met other Machiavellians though. One for sure is exactly as you describe: he had a weak orbiter and would have fucked me over without giving a hint of a damn. The orbiter was a shitty M but was clearly trying... poorly. Others were mostly hustlers on the street trying to…
/r/TheRedPill30/04/14 07:15 AM
1

You said "someone who I consider dumb". I don't know you so I don't know how smart you are. If you're stupid enough then someone you consider dumb could be stupid enough that no, they can't be red pill. Conversely you could be smart and yes, average people (dumb to smart-you) can be red pill. Or put another way: you need to better define what you mean by dumb. (I don't mean any disrespect.)
/r/askTRP30/04/14 06:53 AM
3

That depends on how smart you are.
/r/askTRP30/04/14 05:08 AM
0

I don't know enough about China to say if they were ever communist. They sure as shit are not presently communist. If anything they're a oligarchical technocracy. North Korea was never communist. I'm not sure if Cuba is legitimately socialist or not since they do have a clear ruling party but I can't tell if they are kept in power because dissidents all leave/are kicked out (leaving only pro-party people) or they are despotic. And, of course, for how, if you call yourself a nazi today, you can e…
/r/TheRedPill30/04/14 04:25 AM
3

I don't think it's too hard to figure out when someone is Machiavellian. It's just not a big deal: they will manipulate you but if they are too stupid to seek net positive outcomes then they are shit friends you should dump anyway. So far I've avoided the psychopathic or narcissistic Machiavellians that I've noticed since they've all been too stupid (or thought me too stupid) to be subtle about trying to get me to act against my interests. They tend to be friends of my stupider friends.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/14 04:00 AM
4

I personally think most of psychopathy is a bad thing to have even if it does get you laid. Narcissism and Machiavellianism are good though. So long as you are rational when detachedly evaluating your self, your narcissism only makes you happier and more successful. Most of Machiavellianism is amoral in most moral systems and almost all are amoral in consequentialist morality. A high capacity for manipulating others is leadership. You can do it for the good of your self, your people, or people i…
/r/TheRedPill30/04/14 03:46 AM
1

I use a more general term for "urge" but basically yeah, we're machines with utility functions and heuristics running on error-prone hardware. Free will is a dual fiction: social so we can morally punish wrongdoing and personal so we can recursively adjust our "urges". Douglas Hofstadter was written a bit about this strange loops.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/14 03:41 AM
1

Hardly.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/14 03:35 AM
2

I've only seen 1, 2 and 3. 5 seems like more of a hoe thing and 4 is downright sociopathic.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/14 03:35 AM
1

as sexual assault can be as much as seeing a man streaking Even so, that statistic is fabricated. A non-trivial portion of the women surveyed to produce the 1 in 4 statistic did not consider themselves victims. The wording they used was awkward if not outright intended to inflate their numbers.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/14 03:28 AM
-2

Not all of their data is actually very new but it is wonderful that this is getting traction outside of MRA blogs. Maybe some day feminists won't be able to silence male rape victims in the MSM.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/14 03:25 AM
24

Women just. Don't. Get. It. Despite rhetoric to the contrary, very few women empathize with men to anything above a very trivial degree.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/14 03:21 AM
5

Her phrasing reads to her and other girls as being unrelated to alpha fux beta bux. She hasn't examined her motivations enough nor empathized with men enough to understand what she's actually saying. BP men can't tell either.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/14 03:19 AM
9

Some of the stuff even absolute strangers will start saying amazes me. You can actually flat-out ask strangers for intimate details about their lives and they will usually tell you. If you share a friend or are otherwise introduced and amicable then there is very little they won't share.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/14 03:16 AM
0

Luckily dietary cholesterol has no bearing on blood cholesterol Bullshit. I have zero dietary cholesterol and incredibly low blood cholesterol. That ain't even weird. You need to get your facts from someone credible.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 04:37 AM
2

I was attacked when I was a teenager. She was just mad that I wouldn't give her my lunch money (seriously). This was a grown-ass woman too, not some kid bully.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 04:00 AM
1

I would call those racism and sexism. Same as keeping certain people out of stores/bars/etc. Feminists disagree, obviously, but I also consider them the most sexist people in the first world.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 03:49 AM
1

Yes, there are many distractions from the central issue. Abortion, gun control, etc.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 02:57 AM
1

Hint: whenever you hear the phrase "communist state", someone is lying to you about something being communist. The USSR was not remotely communist. The reason you believe they are is solely propaganda: the USSR wanted everyone to consider them communist for their ability to control and influence their people and third parties and the US wanted everyone to believe the USSR was communist so they could control and influence their people and third parties. Seriously. Communism is explicitly stateles…
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 02:56 AM
1

Aside from the press, nearly all of the people I know in the SF Bay Area are against socialism. Usually they like the idea but think it's unworkable so they are instead liberal.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 02:52 AM
1

But also rare. The conditions that need to be met for common law marriage, in almost all regions, are difficult to meet. For one, you usually have to present yourselves as married. But this can change with legislation. At some point feminists will campaign for either wide-spread common law marriage or some other way to force men to give their wealth to women at the present or heightened rate. It will be interesting to hear their rationalizations.
/r/TheRedPill29/04/14 02:51 AM
1

Liberals are right-of-center everywhere but here so no, they aren't leftists. No one that promotes the interests of capital over the general population is a leftist no matter how far left of you they appear.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/14 04:23 AM
8

No way. The tech people in the SF Bay Area are NOT leftists. They're almost exclusively middle and upper-middle class. Libertarianism and liberalism are typical. Right now there's class conflict in SF about this because the tech folks are pushing out the current residents.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 10:42 PM
4

She quits her job because you can't make her work. Then she divorces you and gets full alimony, possibly (though rarely) for life. To lesser degrees, women choose more pleasant jobs with better work-life balance but less pay. I'm not actually against short-term alimony based on actual earning potential and considers the man's lifestyle in addition to the woman's since, well, divorced men living in shitty apartments is not a stereotype for no reason. It's just not how family court actually works.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 09:33 PM
1

It is possible that common law marriage will go from basically a non-issue to being the norm.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 09:22 PM
3

It isn't a serious concern. Just look up the law in your region before moving in with a woman.
/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 09:19 PM
1

The woman needed financial support and the man wanted to start a family Hell, having and raising children was a capital investment for most men because most men farmed.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/14 09:01 AM
5

Paternity is something women really have no clue about.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/14 08:39 AM
8

At least in the female oriented subs we have the guts to hear other people's opinions and discuss them, whether or not we agree with them Every single feminist forum, including all subreddits, censors anything remotely related to the red pill and even mensrights. Those are very much female-oriented subs. In contrast, this subreddit does not ban outsiders. The mods give them a tag discouraging them from posting... but you can just ignore it. Actually, you're so completely wrong that I suspect you…
/r/TheRedPill25/04/14 05:04 AM
1

Haha awesome. Modern-day "why buy the cow when you get the milk for free."
/r/TheRedPill25/04/14 04:58 AM
3

Men are legal second-class citizens in several ways but affirmative action has such a minor effect that it's not useful to bring up. Bring up the insane sentencing gap or how family court bias is an unequivocal human rights violation against men and a harm to children because terrible mothers are given preference over good fathers.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 04:51 AM
10

There's always one of two reactions: "but what about teh womenz?!" and "you're right! but feminists agree with you!" I'm not sure which is worse.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/14 03:19 AM
1

Lesbians.
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 08:00 AM
19

Pretty much. But in the past, women benefited more from coupling with betas. Now they can get into their 30's without needing to actually fuck a beta. Longer if they have a cat predilection. Hunter-gatherer women wouldn't get enough gifts to live on and usually couldn't acquire enough on their own. Not to mention predators. Alphas are the men that women want to fuck just to fuck. That also makes alpha sons (also, usually, the sons of alphas) a way for women to spread their genes much further tha…
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 07:26 AM
6

Feminine with a good man's sense of loyalty.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 06:59 AM
1

Rhetoric. Not even once.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 06:58 AM
6

To the BP world it's taboo to think. The study also showed more factors that the BP world denies or refuses to consider.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 06:57 AM
1

While true, it's less fair than most people assume the law to be so I bet most women don't realize they can do that until they talk to a lawyer.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 06:57 AM
6

Ugh, you mean Captain Transphobia!
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 06:42 AM
7

Luckily for humanity, betas often compete for women by working. The one guy would be leading while most of the other men work.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 06:40 AM
1

No shit. "Right" and "wrong" (meaning truth and untruth) are absolutes but those absolutes cannot be known with perfect certainty. Socrates was wrong about almost everything interesting he believed but he still did better than random. Similarly, Newton was wrong about almost everything interesting but still did better than random. Just a lot better than Socrates. Being "less right" is another way of saying he was wrong. Which was my point, whooshing by apparently 2 people, given my downvote coun…
/r/TheRedPill23/04/14 05:31 AM
-2

So was Issac Newton.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 04:42 AM
4

Even if they aren't forced to fight, there's no reason they can't be forced to labor for the State. That's what men who don't fight do, if they aren't imprisoned for it.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 03:53 AM
3

The reverse is more-or-less applause lights.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 03:44 AM
2

Probably far before that too. Slutting it up is a good strategy so long as it's kept on the DL, even for hunter-gatherers. Hell, abortifacients have been around for a very long time so one could theoretically carousel without even having children.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 03:19 AM
8

One thing I love about this sub is that that is partially intentional. PC drones are kept away by non-PC language as sure as if this were a private sub but it's still open to open-minded folks.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 03:17 AM
1

How stupid does a person have to be to try to pass these off as sexist? They're all "be polite", tailored for women on dates. Most are extremely easy to adapt to men as well.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 03:14 AM
6

I believe davinox is suggesting men in their 30's marry women in their 20's, before they sleep around much if at all.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 02:52 AM
0

Gotta hook 'em while they're young
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 02:49 AM
3

My mom used to say that to me every single time I said I was bored.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 02:45 AM
4

That makes sense. I'm still in the process of kicking myself whenever I do that. It's trying to relate to the other person and forgetting that if they cared they'd ask.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 02:45 AM
6

"Im so bored, entertain me" This is word-for-word what I've said to women in the past.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 02:43 AM
9

Damn I wish I could bullshit at your level.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 02:40 AM
7

Heh, yeah. All of the romantically successful feminist men I know are at least 6 foot. Most are 6'6" or over. I don't know any short romantically successful feminist men.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 02:38 AM
2

Yes definitely. The author has the right general idea but a suboptimal solution.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 02:33 AM
1

Yes.
/r/TheRedPill22/04/14 02:33 AM
3

No idea. Adhering to the paleo diet almost always involves the naturalist fallacy because it's equating natural (or, often, a stereotype of what's natural) with good. The actual optimum diet can and almost certainly does include some processed foods and GMOs. But shit like french fries and soda pop are worse than eschewing all processed foods and just eating paleo.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/14 07:11 AM
1

There's also a wide variety. Inuits survived from eating organs since they lacked plants.
/r/TheRedPill21/04/14 06:25 AM
1

Oh, I know it was understandable. I was just seeking to improve my writing. That link helps hella. Thanks!
/r/askTRP21/04/14 04:02 AM
5

I wholly disagree with #1 but not the author's intent with it. Death is just entropy. It wins in the end but that end can be far away. 4 is the naturalist fallacy. We do know that whole foods are almost always superior to processed foods but that isn't hard-and-fast. The problem with "science" saying this-and-that is that it isn't science saying shit - it's science journalism. You need to read scientific studies, avoiding all soft motherfuckers if you want the truth. That being said, eating pale…
/r/TheRedPill21/04/14 03:08 AM
1

Any grammar nazis around? I think this is a case for a semicolon: Women talk; men do. but I'm not sure.
/r/askTRP20/04/14 11:54 PM
4

The way we group people by race is largely arbitrary. For instance: there's no particular reason for all Asians to be considered one race. The same is even more true of Blacks, with their higher genetic diversity (in Africa) than other races. I'm not sure if subgroups of e.g. Asians are closer to subgroups of e.g. Africans than other Asians but it seems likely given that border populations heavily intermix. I don't know what SJWs actually mean but that's why I consider race to be a social constr…
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 07:16 PM
2

Kitbutz are more interesting a case study how unsustainable gender neutrality is. A whole society dedicated to eradicating gender roles (and Patriarchy) and the women decided they greatly preferred domestic chores. Kind of like how women in college make choices that piss feminists off.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 07:09 PM
9

Damn bro the Jonah Hill bit is fucking cogent.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 07:03 PM
-1

Also a lot of feminism. Their flavor is more useful than US feminism but it's still got the misandry. More crazies but also more genuine egalitarians. According to what I've read from Swedish men, anyway.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 07:00 PM
4

After living near college students for most of a decade, they're still hot but the intelligence of college students is overrated. The principal discriminator is their parents, not their innate abilities. For the vast majority, that is. The most intelligent people I've ever met - way smarter than me - have all been students. They've also all been STEM, including the women.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 06:58 PM
7

I have family in both CA and the midwest and the midwest is way fatter. Still not overall amazing but damn if there aren't as many 200+ women in california. Even older ones.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 06:55 PM
6

A great way of looking at it is treating every girl as if she's ugly or so-so until you make the decision that it's be a good idea to try and flirt or build rapport. Way harder said than done because women are like art - when beautiful, you can't not feel her/its impact.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 06:53 PM
6

Only to a small degree. To a much greater degree I notice how inflated are the egos of most unattractive women. They can be with a guy much hotter or better than them and still act like they're doing him a favor. Actually, a woman's ego when dealing with men seems to have very little to do with her actual value to men.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 06:52 PM
3

"You're so cute when you act like you're upset" (amused mastery) Ooh, good. It forces her to conform to your narrative (frame) or escalate the shit test. ...though it now occurs to me that that's true of every method of dealing with shit tests. Holy shit.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 08:29 AM
2

Wait, Bushido? I get the others (excellent short list btw) but how's that relate?
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 06:48 AM
1

What is happiness? The feeling that power is growing, that resistance is overcome. The ways men acquire this feeling define our life's goals. For some this is control of others. For some, control of environment. Still others, knowledge or wisdom.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 06:45 AM
2

It's not so much the emotions that cause trouble as your reactions to them, but this difference isn't so obvious until you do some practice. Once you get good you'll still have negative thoughts etc but you won't get aboard the train as it were. Thank you. I haven't been able to come up with a way to articulate this. Still not quite right but a damn sight better than my attempts.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 03:59 AM
0

First of all in real life at least I don't encounter feminist women much at all, seems like most of them are on the internet yelling shit. College campus and surrounding town. Even the family-oriented Christian women are feminist. Can't comment on your other points.
/r/TheRedPill20/04/14 01:43 AM
1

Associating with people like this lowers the fuck out of your own value. Does that matter at a comic con? Any alpha is going to have astronomical value at those venues.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/14 08:23 PM
4

I'm pretty sure bronies aren't doing it for the women.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/14 08:21 PM
2

Almost all of the hot geek girls I know aren't involved in the geek community except online.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/14 08:18 PM
5

In most contexts, yes. Unfortunately the perception of no genius-level difference is used to justify declaiming STEM as gender biased, as well as used to justify demanding equal representation of the sexes in politics both national and organizational.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/14 07:23 PM
15

Men and women have equal average IQs, meaning that the middle hump of the bell curve is in the same spot. This isn't /r/mensrights. You can say that the average female IQ is in fact lower than the average male IQ. It isn't a lot lower but it's sufficiently different that most IQ tests fudge the results to eliminate sex differences.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/14 07:20 PM
6

Drop the notion that language isn't nearly always some kind of political. Most people tell their half-truths by using weaselly language and stick to only what offends the least likely to use their power in offense; they stick to being PC. We don't do that here: our half-truths are in generalizations and being more offensive than we believe because it keeps PC drones out. AKA it's rhetoric and we know it.
/r/TheRedPill19/04/14 04:56 AM
2

The usual answer here is that you teach a young woman to be a good wife, not find one that figured it out on her own. Not having any personal experience with this, I can't say this works. I can say that I find it highly improbably that a 26 year old woman will have learned how to be a good wife without guidance.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 08:36 PM
1

Change it for your children or for all children? NordlichenUbermensch (whose name is amazing btw) is right about your children. For all children, you need to get rationality in school. Gotta sneak it past the theists and feminists but it's not too hard to apply smoke & mirrors.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 06:51 PM
6

You know how cocky serfs can be.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 06:49 PM
5

Ha, well, in the past they've always been able to talk about me me me me me me me and guys have been fine with it. Now that what they want creeps men out, it doesn't work but they lack the social intelligence to actually read male interest in real time.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 06:48 PM
1

The average lie is apparently about 2 inches.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 06:46 PM
2

By "relatively recently" I meant two decades or so ago, lol. My dad's description of school was much more brutal and hierarchical than mine. We had clear cliques and some men and women were cooler and more desirable than others but the jocks didn't go around beating kids up.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 06:43 PM
3

I'd have fucked the girls that wanted to fuck me but I was far too fucking weak to make that shit happen. The sex is not just for its own sake either: I'd have been much happier in high school and so would have done better. Since I already did well, I'd be making way more money right now. Oddly, my pasttimes were mostly fine. I learned valuable skills. I would have kept up my lifting though and done it way more... that died my junior year.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 06:38 PM
1

I'm basing this off of what one said so the actual base reason may be wildly different.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 06:01 PM
2

Man I don't have the damn thing. Used to be that got posted on every /r/mensrights paygap post, of which there have been far too many. Anyway, I was being facetious: the study I'm referencing was restricted to the urban workforce, where college graduates go young college graduates are mostly women.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 06:00 PM
2

Hahaha awesome thanks!
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 05:59 PM
2

Mine too but I'm in my 20's. How old are you?
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 05:59 PM
2

So basically a scientific subdiscpline existing solely to introduce a bias to counter the present male bias. Not a rationalist reformation built on neuroscience to eradicate bias. A fucking pendulum.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 07:43 AM
2

tl;dr of the internet, from bbs on.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 07:38 AM
5

Downvoted because srsly take this down and get a lawyer. They're gonna tell you not to post these details online and the sooner the better.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 07:37 AM
1

Not sure how much of a shoe-in she seemed. I figured it was roughly 50-50 her and Barack. One way or another, the Democrats were going to run a non-white male. Turned out Barack was an amazing candidate if not necessarily president so they got what they wanted.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 07:33 AM
4

Got any more images like that? Fucking loved it.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 07:31 AM
3

Not sure about Australia but in the US, at least, it's effectively a minor crime to murder a cyclist with a car. Juries won't convict for vehicular manslaughter, presumably because they feel like they could make the same mistake/"mistake".
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 07:29 AM
2

I was thinking about this yesterday. Alpha and beta are labels we give to collections of behaviors that roughly correlate to strength and weakness of character. A person can be strong and benevolent and strong and mean but in our world, there aren't many opportunities to be seen as strong and benevolent and many to be seen as strong and mean. All most women want for sex is a strong man.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 07:27 AM
3

No, single urban women just out of college outearn single men by 8%.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 07:21 AM
25

We teach Newtonian physics before we teach either relativity. I do agree that it is dangerous but it's unfortunately the only reliable strategy for this venue. At least, that I know.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 06:02 AM
1

I guessed her as not a gold digger because seriously, she's not going to get a wealthy guy without trickery. I WAY overestimated her intelligence.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 05:50 AM
9

That's basically one of the reasons women who actually wear burkas like them: men can't tell you from ugly so they treat you fairly neutrally. Less distraction for the men and more egalitarian treatment for the women. Burkas seem extreme to me but they do help overcome biology.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 05:46 AM
4

Women hate sluts because they fear their men will be seduced away. Men love sluts and hate Casanovas, which women adore.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 05:42 AM
1

popular men are popular because everyone likes them Isn't that only true relatively recently? I read an article a yearish ago that remarked that the most popular high school boys today are the well-liked ones, not the douchebags. I'm not old enough to know either way, myself.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 05:39 AM
4

This is especially true for women who were not good looking when they were young, they feel that life is unfair and they got cheated because they never got to experience being attractive. The book "The Scarlet Letter" has a scene that is exactly this. The ugly and old women calling for more punishment of the adulteress while the pretty young pregnant woman calls for leniency.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 05:37 AM
50

there are a lot more "nurse types" than TRP says there are Keep in mind that TRP's tone is largely rhetorical. Almost all new guys benefit more from black-or-white statements than shades of gray because they still haven't tamed their hamster.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 05:32 AM
1

Kind of like how in The Ant Bully you see the main character in the start get picked on by the bigger bully and he immediately begins to torture the smaller ants as an outlet for the frustration and to try and appear big. That's a possibility. I was interpreting the trend as traditionally nerdy behavior now being cool but the dynamic of nerdiness stayed: the cool kids ostracize the nerdy kids. Modern nerds are mostly posers.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 05:15 AM
1

Actually, my statement can be interpreted two ways: superpowers are both normal and uncommon AND superpowers are uncommon but bullied teenage girls getting them is normal. The latter is true.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 05:13 AM
1

TIL WordGirl
/r/MensRights18/04/14 05:10 AM
1

Today it is possible to build distributed credibility using PGP and trust networks. Even when it probably shouldn't be, all information one can learn in university is available online somewhere. There are funding models that can be used to produce art (in this case, lectures) available for general use by the public while still paying artists: the various forms of crowd funding. Tight feedback loops are amazing educational tools. There's a reason there are proportionally so many self-taught maste…
/r/MensRights17/04/14 05:51 AM
2

I completely agree: let's strip women of their immense advantage in courts of law. The feminists will put every effort into preventing this but fuck 'em.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 05:46 AM
6

My town had posters up that said literally this. Those that don't believe it either keep quiet or promote lies because they want the pendulum to swing further.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 05:38 AM
11

There is a deep irony in modern nerds belittling people who watch My Little Pony. I know that this isn't necessarily what happened here but it's a very striking trend online.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 05:34 AM
1

You may enjoy Worm. The premise: a bullied teenage girl gets superpowers in a world where this is normal but uncommon. What makes this story unique is that almost everything that happens - including the superpowers - makes sense. The author plays with a lot of themes related to bullying, including how poorly authority deals with it.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 05:27 AM
3

You may enjoy Worm. The premise: a bullied teenage girl gets superpowers in a world where this is normal but uncommon. What makes this story unique is that almost everything that happens - including the superpowers - makes sense. The author plays with a lot of themes related to bullying, including how poorly authority deals with it.
/r/MensRights17/04/14 05:27 AM
1

Lol. Awesome.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 05:18 AM
1

(copied from above) Sorry, there's little chance I'll be able to track it down and there isn't much reason to: every other week someone here makes an accurate post about Buddhism as it relates to TRP. One of the most recent is that Buddhism teaches outcome independence as the cessation of "desire".
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 05:18 AM
1

Sorry, there's little chance I'll be able to track it down and there isn't much reason to: every other week someone here makes an accurate post about Buddhism as it relates to TRP. One of the most recent is that Buddhism teaches outcome independence as the cessation of "desire".
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 05:18 AM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nash_equilibrium Hell, game theory in general. Naive selifishness is only one strategy and gets the shit kicked out of it against effective cooperation.
/r/TheRedPill17/04/14 05:08 AM
1

On the journey of ridding oneself of ones delusions, there's an interesting phenomenon: at some point - usually sooner - you resist losing a delusion because it's part of how you define yourself. Yet there is another point - usually later - that you rid yourself of your delusion of self. At that point other delusions are much easier to eliminate. Unfortunately it's almost always in this order, not the easier one. Such is life.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 08:33 AM
1

Doesn't that fuck with your focus and the character of your thoughts? The angle I tilt my head, down to the degree, has an effect for me.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 08:27 AM
1

Why 20k instead of 10k, like other skills?
/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 08:26 AM
2

I contend that ego death involves more than just silencing the mind. Silencing the mind is one of the first steps and not the last.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 08:25 AM
1

I think he's talking about a different type of ego. You're speaking of the ego in the psychologist sense and I think OP is talking about it in the Buddhist sense.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 08:24 AM
1

I can't articulate exactly what is meant by ego death but I can offer some partial descriptions. If you hear a voice in your head when you think then you have an inner narrative. It isn't always judging you and others but it often is. For some it cruelly attacks its host. For most it's a mixture of good and bad. It's the noise of your brain and it's always yammering. Ego death sees this voice chill the fuck out. Usually it completely quiets. This also happens in the early stages of learning to m…
/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 08:22 AM
1

Ego death's only made me euphoric. I've never done psychadelics though so I imagine one needs to be more careful with them.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 08:01 AM
1

What I got from this is that women are losers because they demand recompense for being offended while men deal with it.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 06:52 AM
17

Excellent. The more mainstream the hatred, the sooner the men's rights movement will gain mainstream acceptance. At some point a critical mass of people will be aware that feminists have been lying about almost everything about MRAs - leading them to realizing that feminists lie about almost everything else as well.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 06:48 AM
1

He is, as stated elsewhere, a bully. He even plays on in The Guild. There at least it's funny because it's a fantasy.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 06:41 AM
2

Anyone is welcome to criticize my views but at least come up with a cogent and convincing argument. This drivel isn't worthy of consideration. Sometimes I daydream about people that can do this.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 06:39 AM
1

Sadly, even /u/wil :(
/r/MensRights16/04/14 06:37 AM
17

She has batted 0's about MRAs before. The only way for someone to be this wrong this consistently is to actually be a liar.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 06:34 AM
0

Are you confused? Both SolaireAstora and I are atheists. He was linking to AtheismPlus, the feminist shitheels of atheism. They reject religion because it's patriarchal, not because it's false.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 05:40 AM
1

Are you trolling or do you seriously not understand my comment?
/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 05:38 AM
1

Thanks.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 05:32 AM
4

Some of this struck a chord with me. Because i wasn't asserting myself, i was too passive and laid back My biggest problem growing up and even today and not just in romance. I know how to make people like me and how to get shit done but I have a really hard time demanding. TRP has helped more than anything else but damn, it's a long road. while being laid back is good for some circumstances it isn't all that good for trying to woo a girl) Damn straight. "Laid-back" is how most people have descri…
/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 05:30 AM
21

My journey never had a distinct BP-RP switch but the closest is probably finding this place during a slew of /r/mensrights why-do-you-hate-trp? threads. Someone outlined buddhist principles as they apply to TRP that were actually correct. With that I knew there was at least some truth to find here but I found a lot. Kind of related: the single most useful thing I learned here is frame. I've manipulated my frame while alone plenty but never knew how to do so around others. Any place that teaches …
/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 05:17 AM
1

Sometimes apparently serious errors are non-issues or don't matter until in production (or even months after launch) so they can be ignored in the meantime. That's only like 5% of the time though.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 07:28 AM
1

Chrome is replacing it as the good alternative to IE and IE has made immense strides in being not terrible. Firefox is losing its niche.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 07:25 AM
2

That bitch. Github is amazing and has done amazing things for plugins of many tools.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 07:24 AM
2

It's a capitalist enterprise so all authority - and responsibility - flows from the top. If a subordinate fucks up then the superior fucked up. Everyone not in the chain of command is not at fault though so if that's what you meant by "business in general" then nevermind.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 07:23 AM
1

Not sure how well that helps actually getting a job (like favor like: you need dat paper because HR lady must justify her paper) but it definitely makes you a better worker.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 07:21 AM
2

I assume they only show quotes that agree with their narrative so: how do the other boys see this? What about the girls?
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 07:08 AM
20

That would be a 40% chance of a false positive, right? sauce
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 07:04 AM
2

A few LWer, I see.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 06:59 AM
2

I'm not sure women can't do all of that. They just overwhelmingly don't because they lack the correct adversity and/or education/upbringing. Margaret Thatcher one such outlier: she was STEM then became a lawyer (barrister because lol UK) then became PM of the fucking UK for like forever.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 05:45 AM
1

good thing. Ha. Hate those guys. They're atheist because they hate religion, not because they love truth. And I wish that sentence were rhetoric.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 05:38 AM
2

People can't empathize with feelings if they haven't experienced anything even remotely like it. Good point. The level of imagination and solid reasoning ability required to simulate another person's very different perspective is far out of reach of most people. After reading 48 laws of power, I rank the best con artists as perhaps of the few with this ability.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 05:36 AM
1

I'm going to cheat a little bit and let you in on a secret: treating ignorant newbies with rudeness weeds out the sort of people that can't take criticism. You haven't earned any respect here so you don't deserve to be treated with any leniency. You failed to lurk moar and then bitched when called out on it. That's weak. But on the positive side, if you stick around here and harbor a measure of humility, you will get over it. Also: Reddit Is Fun provides the sidebar in the (I) button at top, whe…
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 05:28 AM
1

Heheh. They get virtual commitment of "an" alpha by replacing the particular cock with a new one each night.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 05:22 AM
3

The content itself is indeed extremely bluepill. The memes that further blue our culture are incubated by the same people that teach gender studies classes. That being said, you are right about its effects. It's kind of like DARE drug education: you either become staunchly anti-drug or you smell the bullshit and become resistant to anti-drug beliefs, including well-founded ones.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 05:21 AM
5

Silver lining: she thought your genes were great enough to steal!
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 05:18 AM
3

A guy that doesn't grovel is a guy that could be worthy. Shit-tests provide further evidence.
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 04:43 AM
10

They did at least check her credibility first. There's no way to know how well they did that but at least we aren't at hair-trigger massive loss of male rights. That being said, I'd refuse the test unless I was actually possibly implicated, like if I personally knew her, worked where she was (allegedly) assaulted, etc.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 04:39 AM
4

The bias is in calling "military career possibilities" a male privilege without mentioning that those choices come with a non-choice: selective service. That women are excluded from the draft due to the very reasons they are excluded from military advancement then they couldn't use the military as an example of male privilege. By leaving it out, squiddybiscuit is showing immense bias.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 07:10 AM
1

And there we have it folks, all PIV sex is automatically rape. Pretty much. She wrote a lot of words but said nothing. Not once did she address "consent" or "taking advantage" nor that men that are "predators" in her eyes are usually probably just themselves drunk and horny, like her.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/14 11:22 PM
1

Female privilege is not facing romantic rejection. Again. Retarded. Female privilege is being the catered-to demographic for almost all mass media. That isn't a privilege, fuckhead. That's an emotional reaction. Female privilege is forcing men to work for them under threat of imprisonment. Forced labor definitely isn't slavery though. Straight up wrong. Like literally backwards - as a woman, you can take a trip to Utah and ditch your baby, no questions asked. Has no fucking idea what "man up" is…
/r/TheRedPill13/04/14 11:11 PM
4

Those are just the metrics that support your position. You even let out the draft when discussing military careers (how can you not see your own bias when it's that glaring? Damn...) and quality of life is a wide metric that you do not elaborate upon. That women outlive men by a significant margin and are overall less likely to kill themselves are pointed refutations of your belief.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 10:46 PM
1

Bonobos are apes. Monkeys and apes aren't species. I'm not aware of any recent* pre-agricultural culture that has economic classes. The closest thing is a tribe's chief but usually he still works for almost all of his resources and is more like an elected judge than a ruler. This varies a lot by culture but I'm not aware of any that formed distinct classes. It's clearly in our DNA to express alpha, beta and other traits in this vein. The particular set of beta traits we express and how we expres…
/r/TheRedPill13/04/14 07:30 PM
0

You can take drugs instead of experiencing your own weird, long winding path to enlightenment On that note, take ecstasy and pay close attention to your thoughts and emotions. The interplay differs from a sober mind but not as you might expect. Actual enlightenment is more similar to a mind on e than the standard person's sober mind.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/14 09:04 AM
6

Fucking triggers are a real thing. Fuck feminists for piggy-backing on the trauma of war veterans and rape victims (and a smattering of others). These people need help and sympathy, not I'm-so-bored-I'm-going-to-pretend-I'm-broken-AKA-special.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/14 08:49 AM
8

Alpha male is to chaste female as beta male is to slut. Women don't hate betas. They just don't respect them.
/r/askTRP13/04/14 07:45 AM
51

If young women are coming out to oppose feminism it is because they have not yet begun to encounter the disadvantages that await them in later life, she said. AKA they haven't yet hit the wall and lost their pussy advantage.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/14 12:56 AM
11

The tone would be fine except both lists are mildly hostile to men. "Women take their hair seriously" in the first and "men's egos are fragile" in the second.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/14 12:52 AM
5

NEVER be critical of your wife in public. There is NEVER an excuse for this. If you have an issue with your wife, discuss it with her, not your buddies at the golf course. For a given value of "public", this isn't bad advice. Unfortunately that value is not "your buddies at the golf course." NEVER refer to keeping your own children as “babysitting.” They’re your kids and you are their father … it’s not babysitting, it’s called being a father. Isn't this overwhelmingly a female habit? Anyway, I d…
/r/TheRedPill13/04/14 12:50 AM
2

OMG can you even empirical metric?
/r/MensRights12/04/14 11:31 PM
3

Advantage because that's what it is. Privilege both implies and denotes more than mere advantage.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 11:30 PM
3

You did a really good job accusing her of kissing him after she said she only almost did. I'd have taken it literally but, from everything she said after, it's obvious you were dead on.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/14 09:01 PM
2

Good point! Somehow I missed identifying that feeling despite working to overcome it in a roundabout way. Thanks.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/14 08:42 PM
2

Free will is a question with no answer. I've never found someone that can concretely describe what they actually mean by "free will" without it being obviously false or trivial. Free will is just a meme that lets individuals change for the best and societies punish (provide negative incentive and remove undesirables) without guilt.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/14 06:48 PM
5

It is quite possible Blue Pill is not even an evolutionary strategy, but simply a stupid accident of history. A runaway myth, or maybe a political tool that long outlived its creators. This is my suspicion. I don't know how pre-agricultural men were but beta traits seem too well-designed to make the bulk of men subservient as workhorses and warriors for the elite. Pre-agriculture, there was no elite - just one class. While what I just said is functionally true, there are caveats: Some societies …
/r/TheRedPill12/04/14 06:45 PM
13

I'd amend your thesis to say that alphas realized that betas have nothing to work for without pussy and female love. You attract women but women are shit at extremely hard work and projecting violence so you need men too. So you convince your women to get with men that you can control. Now classes exist and you're in the upper echelon.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/14 06:29 AM
6

That level of effectiveness is only available to the more attractive women. It's not available to any but the very very most attractive men though (like < 1%) so your point stands.
/r/TheRedPill12/04/14 06:20 AM
3

I heard the college gender ratio was about 1:1 before the G.I. bill, when men flooded higher education. Any truth to that?
/r/TheRedPill12/04/14 06:19 AM
1

This seems to be how my parents' peer group operated. My dad had a lot of female friends. He just happened to have fucked half of them. Doesn't stop them from being friends decades later.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 08:05 AM
1

Acquaintances, really. Definition of friendship varies, of course.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 07:57 AM
1

Amazingly I know several women that do get it. In motherfucking America. They're also all dating high-SMV men with at least a strong mixture of alpha qualities. This is still only about 1% of the women I know.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 07:55 AM
1

Usually they assume you're an orbiter, yeah. From observing a friend of mine's large number of female friends, I suspect higher SMV men are much less likely to be categorized as an orbiter except by the stupidest of women.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 07:54 AM
3

That is one way to describe the fulfillment of a utility function. But she'd be better off if she trained her utility functions to better serve her long-term goals.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 07:34 AM
5

The best thing about this thesis is the cornucopia of sources and empirical data. /s
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 07:28 AM
7

Feminist say: feminism get you laid! See? Feminism helps men ;) Man remarks: feminism did not get me laid Feminist say: feminism is not about getting laid, misogynist!
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 07:20 AM
9

Won't date men that can use abstract reasoning.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 07:15 AM
24

One reason why children and teenagers should see naked adults (in non-sexual contexts).
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 07:14 AM
1

Not directly relevant but this could be decentralized and apply across forums.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 03:42 AM
0

Seeing this post, I immediately looked to see if you'd be doing that. I'd appreciate it in the sidebar.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 03:40 AM
1

I don't disagree with your point but from what I understand (no sauce on-hand), dressing like a slut has little to do with the incidence of rape. Extremely relevantly, walking like a victim is what singles women out for rape.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 03:37 AM
1

Sociopaths are not evil people, they just think about things differently. For example, you will have a very hard time convincing me to volunteer at a soup kitchen, because logically I will conclude that I can do far more good by working my day job and donating the money or hiring someone to help the poor. I highly discount the value of "the feels". It would greatly disturb me to do something like volunteer at a soup kitchen when I know I can provide better help simply giving money. I first reali…
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 03:34 AM
2

It involves either courage or suppressing habit. Courage is principally masculine but suppressing habit is logical.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 03:21 AM
2

Partially it's due to feminist conditioning making them think women ought to make the first move about as much as men, halting the male hamster on an incorrect but otherwise reasonable ground. The rest is just being a pussy though. Men fear rejection as much as women, before they get used to it. Women just never get used to it.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 03:18 AM
2

The impetus remains regardless but, to elaborate: immense wealth disparity exacerbates that behavior, along with displays of wealth.
/r/TheRedPill10/04/14 02:58 AM
2

She tried to set him up and you want him to act like it's a neutral conversation?
/r/askTRP09/04/14 08:40 AM
2

Ok cool, so they don't have a word for desire as we use it. They're referring to attachment, craving, etc. Not desire in the sense of seeking or preferring a particular outcome nor passion in the sense of intense emotion.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 06:33 AM
1

Good point.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 05:38 AM
1

Wikipedia's description of desire in the Buddhist sense jives with my interpretation, for what that's worth.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 05:38 AM
2

Do you have a link that explains what they mean by "desire-passion?" What Buddha saw as "desire-passion" in this context is central to my point. Thanks for responding.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 05:34 AM
4

It teaches that desire is wrong No! No fault on your part but this was translated very fucking badly. You can decipher the actual meaning by reading a bit about what is meant by "desire". He talks about attachment. Desire causes you to latch onto something so when it's gone, you are distraught, sad, angry, whatever. You react negatively to it. The correct translation is to practice outcome independence. Now, this is what Buddha (Siddhartha) believed. He also didn't believe in a soul yet Tibetan …
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 05:12 AM
1

It took surprisingly little practice for me to learn to default to looking people in the eyes when I lie. That itself is a tell, of course.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 04:59 AM
2

Interesting. Perhaps this is also part of why men prefer feminine women: we feel more masculine in the presence of its inverse.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 04:58 AM
1

From what I can tell, it's absurdly popular with college-going guys.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 04:50 AM
3

Aww. Makes me think of the little sister (redhead)'s face in this scene of Frozen.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 04:46 AM
8

I have a very alpha friend. At first I thought his girlfriend just happened to share his outlook and demeanor. He got a new girlfriend and, lo and behold, her outlook and demeanor now match his.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 04:45 AM
3

Many a man has thought that he would get a girl because they liked the same music, books, tv, ideology, whatever. It just doesn't work that way. Damn straight. In high school, this girl I knew was gushing about how awesome this guy (my friend) was. Her list almost perfectly described me. The real reason she wanted to bone him - he was tall, dressed cool (for high school...), and was older - were not spoken aloud.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 04:44 AM
3

Down to a point, you may be right. Men are definitely going to build shelter and otherwise make their lives easier. Grand projects might not exist or be much rarer.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 04:40 AM
5

Is there a way to access the link of a redditlog post? The only links appear to the signin junk and the [-] buttons.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 04:23 AM
3

I sometimes compare this to measuring how much workers and owners produce and concluding that the proletariat are exploiting the bourgeoisie*. It doesn't matter that workers do the most work when the owners reap the profits. Comparing salary is effectively equivalent since male wealth transfers to women through common marriage wealth, alimony, child support, and - this is a big one - taxation. * To avoid any argument here, pretend Marx was right or something. This is mostly useful as a rhetorica…
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 04:21 AM
3

Or in other words, men pioneer burgeoning fields.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 04:14 AM
5

The sad thing is that high school mathematics isn't even entertaining. It's almost all rote application of formulas. This changes a bit in calculus but not by much. Talking to my friend that's an actual mathematician, it's like even the most boring-sounding stuff is actually really interesting because he has to approach things with so much creativity. Plus the way of breaking down functions is fascinating for me.
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 04:11 AM
2

My wife started college as a pre-med major, then decided to become a teacher instead. She says it's because she worked as a tutor one summer and fell in love with the idea of working with kids. The real reason is that majoring in biology is just the beginning. She'd have had to prepare for and take the MCATs, apply for med school, pass med school, do a residency, and really bust her ass. Or she could make straight A's throughout college, be done with school in 4 years, get a job in a field that …
/r/TheRedPill09/04/14 04:09 AM
1

Wait, does viagra actually turn men on? I was under the impression it just gets one hard. That's enough for men to engage in sex but isn't equivalent to being horny.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 05:50 AM
2

Haha no I haven't. This one used to threaten to spit at me whenever I got near though.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 05:49 AM
2

Yeah, homosexuality doesn't work that way. That's pretty much how transgenderism works though.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 04:37 AM
1

It's reciprocal about half the time.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 04:31 AM
3

Somehow, some way, it's a man's fault.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 04:31 AM
2

Interesting notion. In a world where no one (that you date) has any frame control, the "red pill lesbian" is queen.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 04:26 AM
4

"Cat fights" can be really fucking brutal. I don't think women have a culture, or perhaps an instinct, of non-lethal dominance displays. Men will fight with fists but avoid nut shots, weapons, and maiming because that way, so does the other guy. This is similarly true of animals that do dominance displays: they won't use claws or piece arteries with their teeth.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 04:24 AM
3

Are we not arguing over whether or not MRAs are right to consider lived experience to be as valid as rigorous empirical studies?
/r/MensRights08/04/14 02:56 AM
1

Physical differences between men and women and social differences in how we're treated. Namely that women have a hard time physically coercing men and men have a hard time socially coercing women. Relatively. I didn't mention drunken rape because neither sex has a great advantage there. The crucial difference is in how strongly I believe (and present my beliefs) and that my beliefs are backed by at least plausible reasoning. lawsofmurray provided no reasoning behind his beliefs. Since they are i…
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 02:55 AM
1

Are there any non-trivial problems that couldn't be solved by someone (not necessarily the wife or children) just not caring?
/r/MensRights08/04/14 02:49 AM
1

They use shitty definitions of rape, even for the women.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 02:45 AM
9

MRAs will be damned if they acknowledge the lived experience of women paints men as domineering in society Maybe when they can produce some facts their opinions can be worth listening to. To be clear, I am saying that a person's lived experience, when considering generalities (aka not how specific individuals act), is worthless. If you were abused as a child then you think child abuse is a bigger problem than it is. If you were raised in a loving home then you think child abuse is a smaller prob…
/r/MensRights07/04/14 07:24 AM
6

A couple of ugly, poorly-dressed guys online wore fedoras. Someone said this was what MRAs look like and it caught on. It's just the cool kids bullying those they can get away with bullying.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 07:15 AM
3

I think he is. I thought the rates were more like a 3:1 ratio so I must be thinking of either serious violence or murder. Or my memory is faulty, of course.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 07:14 AM
3

I don't think they're capable of that level of cunning. You have to get over blind hatred to dissect your enemies to that level. More likely they see all attempts at pro-male spaces as vile and just attribute anything negative to them that they can, until something sticks. Radfem (and even moderate fem) blogs routinely get less than half (and sometimes even 0%) of their facts about MRA and related people's beliefs correct. They aren't aiming for accuracy. All TGMP needs to be called hate-mongeri…
/r/MensRights07/04/14 07:04 AM
15

Sure. Throughout human prehistory, tribe/race/ethnicity was the biggest factor. People have always been distrustful and dehumanizing of foreigners. Once class appeared, class and tribe/race/ethnicity have competed for first. Globalization (and the internet) bring the peoples closer together, reducing racism and related prejudices in the long run (cycles of tension and acceptance). Globalization under capitalism also intensifies class distinction because capitalism invariably stratifies wealth an…
/r/MensRights07/04/14 06:58 AM
7

On the plus side, she's not evil. Not a fucking high bar, not being evil, but he could always date a serial killer...
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 04:57 AM
2

Rape festivals sound like the sacking of a town just after conquest, back in most of human history and the third world of today.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 04:56 AM
1

But women are disproportionately victims of rape in civilian society Got a study that shows that? Or is this just common sense? "It is known" my ass. Women probably are the greater majority of rape victims but all our evidence to that effect is weak. We know (because scientific method) that men forget their victimization at four times the rate of women, in the case of childhood molestation. When it comes to threaten-you-with-a-knife rape, I'd be surprised if women were anywhere near as much as m…
/r/TheRedPill07/04/14 04:53 AM
3

Standard operating procedure: projection. Marriage is a shit deal for men so women tout how amazing it is for men and how terrible it is for women. Notice how every point is trivial, neutral or something women also benefit from: Trivial: name change kids bear your name Neutral: changes her home Benefits her: builds a home with you has children by pregnancy gets fat (indulged in food) Only leaving her family may actually be a serious negative for her but the man only invariably does the same. Now…
/r/MensRights07/04/14 12:22 AM
1

Maybe you were a saint in a past life so your karma's out of whack - in a good way.
/r/askTRP06/04/14 11:04 PM
1

Humans are just about the only species that doesn't operate exactly like that. Women actually compete for men - a complete novelty in the animal kingdom. If a woman doesn't benefit an alpha man, he nexts her. In other societies this extended to children as well.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/14 07:30 PM
8

Also when women are offended a significant portion will campaign against you. When men are offended most suck it up.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/14 07:17 PM
6

Trying to be as far removed from direct experience as humanly possible.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/14 07:15 PM
2

The app was actually to look at yourself looking at tit pictures. Though presumably it showed the tits as well.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/14 07:14 PM
7

This would be useful as a full post.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/14 07:12 PM
1

But viagra does work on women. Just analogous to how it works on men: increased bloodflow in the clit. This source is mostly speculative but empirical evidence suggests it does enhance sex.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/14 07:10 PM
6

This is /r/mensrights. You can safely read between the lines that Thorrtun's comment is saying exactly that men can't just leave.
/r/MensRights06/04/14 05:41 AM
7

You could try getting used to this being a sub about men relating to women rather than a sub on human psychology. Men wanting everything is irrelevant to the discussion at hand. Gender-neutrality of language would be nice but doesn't add anything particularly worth having.
/r/TheRedPill06/04/14 03:57 AM
29

Poor diet doesn't help either.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/14 11:55 PM
1

I can't find anything credible proving or even suggesting that gay men have more estrogen than straight men. If they did then they would be more* feminine though. * Physically anyway. Probably mentally too but I didn't read anything to that effect.
/r/askTRP05/04/14 11:47 PM
1

There's nothing about homosexuality that makes it especially feminine. That's mostly stereotype since the flamboyant gay man was easily made iconic because it's so distinctive. I think even that is mostly a reaction to cultural norms. I'm interested in hearing your reasoning behind homosexuality being unnatural. Natural selection seems to predict homosexuality[1], making it natural. Not amazing evidence but discusses some prior work that shows some interesting patterns, like homosexuality in mal…
/r/askTRP05/04/14 09:33 PM
1

Dammit. This makes far too much sense.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/14 05:17 PM
7

Bitching away, to stifle her own bad conscience So on point.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/14 06:54 AM
18

The mods are censoring all comments, even neutral ones or ones calling for evidence.
/r/MensRights04/04/14 05:20 AM
9

What exactly prevents structuring a corporation as a federation of smallish corporations? Aside from the annual $800 or w/e per license.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/14 05:10 AM
9

After the South Park episode I looked into it and yeah, Mormonism's secular aspects are pretty great. Makes me wish I could believe or fake it well enough, sometimes.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/14 05:08 AM
5

It turns out that a civilization-wide mantra of victimhood and empowerment almost completely purges guilt from subsequent generations.
/r/TheRedPill04/04/14 05:07 AM
19

Trigger warnings are stimuli that cause a panic attack from PTSD. The fuckheads of the tumblrverse have done actual victims a disservice.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 02:25 AM
1

Yup.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 02:20 AM
1

Hahaha that's fucking great.
/r/TheRedPill03/04/14 02:19 AM
2

No, I (correctly) assumed you were giving simplified advice. I disagree that it's optimal in this context. Obviously I could be wrong and he will take the positive and ignore or at least later lose the negative.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 08:05 AM
36

Girls love making their men jealous, its like gives them a natural high or something. Controlling something more powerful than yourself.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 06:49 AM
2

This would be the RP "fight for her". Some Sun Tzu shit.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 06:49 AM
11

People who do consulting work learn this FAST or drop out. Clients are merciless about scope creep. Too many designers and coders allow little un-agreed-upon changes for fixed-cost jobs that inevitably expands into hours of work, lowering hourly pay to absolute shit levels. This shit is even true of big companies dealing with larger companies. Fuckers will demand anything and everything, including impossibilities and completely uncontrollable externalities.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 06:47 AM
1

Ah, thanks.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 05:20 AM
1

RM? I bought all of the stories of "abuse" by her ex husband hook line and sinker Sucks. I'm lucky one of my mom's boyfriends (surprise: the engagement didn't last) told me about his experience with that bullshit.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 04:43 AM
2

While I disagree with your apparent position, I agree that this thread is being uncharacteristically moralistic and that self interest must be considered. Too much BP thinking is centered around naive selflessness.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 04:26 AM
8

The list of women you can show weakness in front of without negative consequences: Your mother. Sadly that isn't even true of all mothers.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 04:22 AM
1

Male provision, I'd like to point out, that they get from men at the barrel of a gun, with the State as proxy.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 04:20 AM
2

There isn't a single mother around who doesn't have a pitiful tale of woe and sorrow about how awful and "abusive" her ex was. In most cases, it's all bullshit. That pissed me off at first but you know, even though it's strictly bullshit (as generalizations are), I don't have enough of a sample to really argue. I'm only angry because my mother was single. I'm certain she didn't say anything that bad about my father since her very BP white-knight fiance (that took like, what, three months?) would…
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 03:57 AM
-1

Nothing, absolutely nothing is more important than your health Normally I ignore statements like this because their rhetorical effects are worth the inaccuracy. Here though I can't. Only for sociopaths and others lacking any meaningful direction in life is it true that health is the most important thing. As economically useful as it is to model people as perfectly selfish, most real humans care about something more than themselves even if they are utterly incompetent at doing anything about it.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 03:43 AM
0

I was dating a Ukrainian girl, and when talking about race she would insist that I was a "white-person". I suspect because there is less social programming in these countries. I learned in high school that hispanic girls do NOT like to be called white even if their ancestry is almost all Spanish. They also don't like to be called native american but the reactions were more along the lines of "that's a weird thought" than offense. From your comment, maybe my comments would've gone better if I wer…
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 03:33 AM
1

Also learn the difference between LTR preferences and hook-up preferences. It was a "D'oh!" moment for me when I read "alpha fucks beta bucks" described as a dual sexual strategy. Such a simple idea with a lifetime of semi-frequent examples that almost never deviate and it works for both sexes both in reverse and very differently.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 03:22 AM
1

apologizing doesn't absolve her of guilt. Or maybe that's just me, but typically I've never apologized for something and then been like "well it's all good now!" What ever happened to penance?
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 03:14 AM
2

Fair enough.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/14 02:09 AM
1

Keep in mind that her friends heavily influence her choices. Way more than your friends influence yours.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/14 05:09 AM
7

It's completely valid to discuss the impact of science and technology on gender relations. Where the authors failed is with actually doing that with a heaping of female chauvinism.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 09:49 AM
6

I can't find anything suggesting that the editors defended that statement. Both the page Talk and the general project feminism Talk pages don't mention it (by ctrl-f) and the diffs I looked at don't show it being reverted though I go only got through around half of them.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 09:46 AM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarianism_in_the_United_States#History I suppose you disregard anything Chomsky says on principle.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/14 07:05 AM
2

Maybe I hit the one PC thing about /r/theredpill? lol
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 08:25 PM
2

Right but at least some non-whites don't want to be lumped in with others just because they're non-white since their experiences do and did widely differ. I know since I asked.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 08:25 PM
1

I realize now that my comment was ambiguous. My meaning was essentially that most people do mistake marketing slogans for reality.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 08:23 PM
1

It is clear that the goal of feminism is not equality but the subjugation of men to women Don't mistake your perspective as obvious or common.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 10:02 AM
3

I figured it was just a variation of colored. Thanks. As an aside, I am getting hammered with downvotes tonight.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 09:59 AM
8

You're probably right.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 06:58 AM
2

Ah, makes sense. Thanks.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 06:54 AM
3

I have talked to and read the writings of a schizophrenic. That reads like a schizophrenic's writing. Obviously this isn't proof but I am highly skeptical.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 06:52 AM
2

What you wrote is that AmericanOcelot should eschew evidence because it would make him believe a certain way. Did you instread mean to say that leftists don't read evidence?
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 06:48 AM
4

They're also less aggressive so they're easier to exploit. If you undervalue yourself then you don't demand raises then your employer makes a few grand (or even way more) extra per employee. It adds up.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 06:46 AM
1

The blue pill thrust is obedience and power through sacrifice. Betas mean more tools and less competition.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 06:44 AM
11

IMO black women don't age well but I suspect that's my own peculiarity.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 06:40 AM
3

An 80:1 ratio would actually be a bit shy of 99%. 1 - (1/(80 + 1))
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 06:38 AM
2

I also don't note race. It would come off as incredibly weird to do so even when I lived in almost solely white areas.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 06:34 AM
-6

It strikes me as odd to call Indian women "women of color" since they didn't go through any of the same struggles as did American blacks. I did have a professor that thought of herself that way but I don't know how blacks feel about this.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 06:30 AM
-1

edit: It occurred to me that propaganda's influence on what people think of as socialism may be having a critical role in our disagreement. The USSR was capitalist for most of its existence despite being described by both the USSR and the US (and others, I imagine) as socialist or communist. In the USSR, only the Party had control over the means of production. You can't have State socialism without some form of functional democracy. edit (cont.): The US wanted a boogieman in socialism and the US…
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 04:00 AM
-1

...yes they are. That's what libertarian means like everywhere but the US.
/r/TheRedPill30/03/14 01:14 AM
0

Is this a joke? Vague and ambiguous mean basically the same thing. No, they aren't. If some phrase has exactly (for instance) two meanings but a sentence doesn't differentiate then it's ambiguous. If some phrase could mean many things but they're uncertain or otherwise non-definite then it's vague. Socialism is ambiguous because there are definite limits to what is can mean. No matter how you twist it, if workers don't control their means of production then it isn't socialism. In contrast, freed…
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 11:43 PM
-2

They are related but communism is more specific. Feminism results in women's liberation but women's liberation isn't necessarily feminist. Actually both of these are about logical inclusion. Communism is socialist but not all socialism is communist and feminism is women's liberation but women's liberation isn't always feminist.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 11:10 PM
-8

Socialism isn't communism and women's liberation doesn't even necessarily relate to feminism.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 09:05 PM
1

The DMV is not socialist because it is not a means of production.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 09:03 PM
-3

Usually people are saying that e.g. the USSR is not communist. Communism is more specific than socialism and outright cannot involve a State. Also, "public ownership of the means of production" is not vague, it's ambiguous. There are many ways to structure socialism and most can co-exist. Just anarcho-capitalism in most ways.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 09:01 PM
2

Libertarians are socialists everywhere except America where the word was corrupted. Forced redistribution of wealth isn't a socialist idea, it's a totalitarian one. Socialism means that the workers - the people that actually create wealth - control the means of production - the tools they use to create wealth. Forced redistribution is a hack job capitalists tack on to the State to keep the workers from revolting.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 07:43 PM
0

Socialism isn't really a form of government, it's a form of economy. Forced redistribution isn't even necessarily socialist.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 07:42 PM
14

an european Should be "a european". The choice of "a" or "an" depends on how a word sounds, not how it's spelled. Yes, that is insane.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 07:40 PM
0

Which is ridiculous since there's no material basis for men being the bourgeoisie and women being the proletariat. Surprise-surprise: rich folk have children of both genders.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/14 07:38 PM
2

This is some Deep Wisdom shit. And no, that is not a compliment.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/14 05:00 PM
2

I recommend getting close enough male friendship(s) that you can open up to them when you must.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/14 04:58 PM
1

Not really. More happiness is found in being emotionally uninvested in any particular outcome. How this can be combined with intense passion is difficult to express but luckily it can be.
/r/TheRedPill28/03/14 04:55 PM
1

Attraction isn't a choice. Cheating because a hotter woman came along is a choice. It's more akin to saying to a woman "If you get fat, men won't be attracted to you anymore."
/r/TheRedPill28/03/14 04:53 PM
13

What on earth gave you that impression? Someone threatens you, you call the police AKA state violence.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 04:39 PM
1

Odd that I fall in love so intensely but never have control problems. So far each time I've been hopelessly beta but that was my baseline.
/r/TheRedPill27/03/14 07:52 AM
1

Men/women always get the partner they deserve. Often this is much less than what they think they deserve. Women settle and hate the person they settled for. Men don't know and don't want to know that they don't know how to deal with women. Excellent.
/r/TheRedPill27/03/14 07:45 AM
1

Could be. It drastically alters libido in some women.
/r/TheRedPill27/03/14 04:22 AM
1

Yeah. I can't tell if you think I'm arguing with me or you're agreeing and moving the conversation in the same direction each time.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 07:16 AM
1

A low bar by the standards of hypotheses people share with each other but a very high bar relative to the entire hypothesis space. That isn't saying much though, as you say :P
/r/MensRights26/03/14 02:58 AM
1

Oh lol I'm over-analyzing then.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 05:21 PM
2

Is that true? My understanding is that most ruling classes are organized as families, usually with male heads. I'd expect the "1%" in these cases to be much closer to gender-agnostic. Maybe with a slight push in favor of men due to social climbing and purges since AFAIK only men have ever reached heights so far above the status quo. I'm thinking of Genghis Khan and Alexander the Great rather than Queen Elizabeth, who worked within the status quo to effect her change.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 05:59 AM
5

It's basically the same for wealthy men as well except men principally achieve wealth through birth.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 05:54 AM
2

I had considered that women would see men as less threatening once they see male behavior from the male perspective but I hadn't considered that female fear of male sexuality would be reduced by something like that. Thank you.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 05:52 AM
1

I think it incredibly likely that that is only one component. There are a lot of altered factors from this change that likely reduce sexual assault report rates that aren't mutually exclusive. Women seeing men as human and so reporting less, being worried about how their male comrades will perceive them for reporting (both frivolously and truthfully), having to live with their abusers, their male bunkmates having their backs so abusive men are kept in check, women being humanized to men due to a…
/r/MensRights25/03/14 05:50 AM
1

Care to elaborate or just sling shit?
/r/MensRights25/03/14 05:45 AM
3

In other words, evopsych produces hypotheses consistent with evolution. There are many hypotheses consistent with evolution but only one fully true one.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 05:39 AM
2

So basically he was poly in the sense that he engaged in frequent threesomes?
/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 04:07 AM
11

A woman saying you do x all the time just means that x displeased her. It doesn't even need to be a turnoff. Shaming her once for being massively inconsiderate will still get her to say you guilt-trip her all the time. Remember: feelz.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 04:06 AM
6

despite all their rhetoric of saying men are afraid of commitment, it is they who are so quick to give up on their own commitments and abandon their men in searches of greener pastures. Which is why smart men do avoid commitment. Women can't be trusted to stick with their man when they have the material option to stray.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 04:03 AM
2

Non-fertile women are still useful to others. Most matriarchs are both. If nothing else, childless aunts act as childcare. Old women can also work, benefiting others as specialization and trade do. They have in the past and do today. With less government siphoning money from men to women this would be more pronounced.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/14 06:55 PM
1

It's, like, karmically balanced. Not fair though.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/14 05:49 PM
8

Men invented high heels to better ride stirrup'd horses. It then expanded into general fashion. Then women adopted them. Men also invented corsets for their own use before women picked them up. The problem with corsets wasn't that they were difficult to take off (bodices were too, to a degree) but that they fucked a person up by deforming them. That applied to both men and women. I'll bet she also spells "women" as "womyn" because she can't etymology.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/14 05:37 PM
0

"sleight of hand"
/r/TheRedPill22/03/14 05:26 PM
2

Yup. I did hate my last job, in the end, and avoided talking about it with coworkers until almost a year into my present job. I think that might have been a mistake even then.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/14 05:25 PM
-2

Most feminists are pretty harmless. They're just given to herd mentality as feminism is popular.
/r/TheRedPill22/03/14 05:19 PM
1

/r/dogecoin
/r/TheRedPill21/03/14 06:45 AM
2

One word: fashion Ah. Ugg boots and fads. Check any female dominated reddit. Still not sure what you mean but you've prompted a possibility: fluency without content is like using scientific words without scientific rigor. A facade.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/14 03:25 AM
1

I mean the men's rights movement. Men's rights are harmed as a consequence of upholding the status quo. Sorry for the accidental misdirection. The usual vehicle of attack is attacking activists and activism. Every SRS person I know IRL smears the men's rights movement and the notion that men are seriously put out in any way. Articles online are universally lies; Jezebel's articles especially are so wrong that they'd have to know the truth to miss it so thoroughly.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 03:22 AM
2

I don't subscribe to it even though ostensibly it's in my interests precisely because it's too depressing.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/14 03:19 AM
6

That's damn weird! Sucks :(
/r/MensRights19/03/14 05:41 AM
4

Almost everyone in SRS actively campaign to denigrate men's rights. They're not powerful but they are numerous and loud.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 05:41 AM
2

Many feminist atheists are atheist because they hate Christianity (it's patriarchal). Most other atheists are atheist because religion is unsupported by evidence. Hateful atheists are entirely capable of violence. Most of it's like OP experienced though, with social attacks instead of physical. They are cowards.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 05:38 AM
9

The vast majority of the atheists I know are wholly disinterested in atheism+ and very few have even heard of it. I'm guessing meetup.com's demographics skew toward liberal college students.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 05:33 AM
1

From what I can tell, the top two factors the determine victimization are availability and presenting oneself as a victim. Feminism preaches neither.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 05:24 AM
3

Holy fuck you're right. friendship without trust Women betraying their "best" friends is cliche. opinion without risk When you can yell "misogynist!", argument holds little risk. It isn't PC to disagree with a woman. change without aesthetics Not sure what this means. age without values The shit advice older women give younger women competes in destructiveness with the advice they give young men. Yup. food without nourishment The American condition. Fuck fast food. power without fairness Oh god.…
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 05:18 AM
1

While I am personally against lying in this case, you aren't convincing. I also don't think it's male hamstering.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 05:07 AM
2

That isn't solipsism. You are looking for a wolf alpha. So there is hope!
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 04:57 AM
1

Like others have said, it's a tool and therefore inherently neutral. I don't personally condone cheating but I understand why it occurs. Nor do I feel better or worse about men or women cheating.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 04:53 AM
0

Women ARE physically scared most of their lives. One day I'll grok this, dammit. Being scared when the facts (and thus, rational thought) dictate that one is safe. I just don't know if I can do so without losing what little baseline respect I maintain for others. Or even if I should.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 04:51 AM
9

Remember that anything a woman says (especially an expression of emotion!) cannot be used analytically as a statement of fact. Girls will say all kinds of shit. Ignore what they say, watch what they do. Even when I was BP I considered what women say they want to be an irrelevant footnote. Recently I said as much and the other party flipped their shit. Apparently even this modicum of RP wisdom is taboo.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 04:44 AM
5

I bet women would be far more emotionally "safe" if they had the same emotional support as men aka null to slight.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 04:41 AM
8

It still depends on the state. 17.9 is young enough in many states. Dragontitz likely lives in such a state.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 04:36 AM
4

Whenever considering why a person acts as they do, I first consider how they benefit. People frequently deviate from this but it's an excellent baseline.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 04:34 AM
1

The comments at least should mention it if the zeitgeist considers female-male rape to be rape.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 04:33 AM
40

A 16 year old knows damn well, from the get-go, that fucking a 8 year old is severely fucked up. She'd have to be - and I mean this literally - retarded to think otherwise. (not that you're saying otherwise but a 16 year old man would get fucked hard for fucking an 8 year old girl).
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 04:32 AM
67

It is if you're a woman. You wouldn't realize it though.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 04:31 AM
1

That's another extreme though. The most I plan on doing is once a month, maybe once every two months. 20 in 6 months is crazy. I imagine one would be depressed as shit by default.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 04:27 AM
2

It's not your students that are a concern. The SJWs of reddit will destroy your career if they can.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 05:22 PM
5

For years I thought when people complained about blacks they were really complaining about black culture.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 04:04 AM
1

I'm arguing against java, not C. C is an excellent language to learn early (though I'd actually recommend assembly).
/r/TheRedPill18/03/14 03:07 AM
-2

You are just combative as shit. I mention lisp because it's the oppose of java in many ways. If you like verbosity and programming in the very specific way java requires then you very likely don't like lisp. Vice-versa as well. Whether you're in the Turing or Church camp isn't that important in the end of the day but it means we won't agree on particulars like language choice or programming style.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/14 11:10 PM
-2

Most of those concepts you mention aren't particularly useful. Seeing as you mention java and C and not lisp, I'm thinking we won't agree no matter how long we argue.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/14 10:15 PM
1

The author is overcomplicating things. The way to outsmart the Dunning-Kruger effect is to learn to project confidence regardless of actual competence AKA act.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/14 05:04 PM
6

Most atheists reject religion for the wrong reasons. Feminists seem to principally do so out of rejection of patriarchy. Youths often do so to rebel. Many people reject religion due to arguments dissecting its pieces. A handful reject religion because disbelief is the correct default position.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/14 05:00 PM
2

What advantage is java giving over python? Python is much more concise and almost as powerful. It's poor teaching to get students in the habit of ignoring code they don't understand because helloworld.java necessitates writing "public static void main". C though is necessary. I'd actually recommend assembly language instead of C because memory layout and pointers is much more obvious.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/14 06:41 AM
5

Python's an excellent introductory language but you're right, a person HAS to learn C or something roughly equivalent to gain the necessary breadth to actually understand computation.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/14 06:21 AM
2

Not directly, no. I tried to train a couple but so far it hasn't worked out. (I realize you're being rhetorical.)
/r/TheRedPill16/03/14 06:17 AM
1

Those companies have excellent QA.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/14 06:15 AM
3

Feminism is an absolute delight when I ignore its effects and only consider how fantastic a PR job they've done. Somehow the women's lobby managed to convince almost everyone that it's the people's lobby. Fantastic job.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/14 06:13 AM
8

I wonder if there's a single HR person anywhere that knows the answer.
/r/TheRedPill16/03/14 06:11 AM
4

It was removed. You can look through the history to find it. Here's the diff: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Fertilisation&diff=599802770&oldid=599802550
/r/MensRights16/03/14 04:10 AM
1

I'm not sure exactly which ages they are talking about (inclusive or exclusive) but it sounds like they are sampling people of the ages where most girls are the most attractive they will ever be while boys are nowhere near their peak.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 01:41 AM
2

Reject the assumption that such decisions have anything what-so-ever to do with fairness.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 12:38 AM
3

That would be the point where suicide bombing is rational and humanitarian.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 12:32 AM
0

On the plus side, she cut away the bullshit about prison being rehabilitative.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 12:31 AM
2

I don't know about lesbian rape but lesbian relationships are at least as violent as straight relationships. Gay relationships are the least violent.
/r/MensRights16/03/14 12:30 AM
1

Ah. Thanks.
/r/TheRedPill15/03/14 11:39 PM
1

Damn! He deleted his comment before I got a chance to read it. What did he call me, if you don't mind?
/r/TheRedPill15/03/14 11:20 PM
3

PS. This is not an attempt at a "women are bitches" joke It would be a good lead-in though!
/r/TheRedPill15/03/14 11:19 PM
11

How on earth does someone fail to meet a man-hating feminist at feminist gatherings? It's not even an unlikely lie about feminists - if you hate men, feminist is your social movement of choice. Even if feminist weren't anti-male this would be so.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 09:02 PM
1

Likely they make TBP-only accounts to keep us from doxxing them. Projection, obviously.
/r/TheRedPill15/03/14 06:40 PM
20

I was under the impression that negging was principally about signaling to a woman that you're higher status than her. Not that undermining self-esteem doesn't work but that's very clearly a negative act since it drags others down.
/r/TheRedPill15/03/14 06:27 PM
3

Aside: I dreaded going to work, for fear of being treated like a child by individuals who had children my age and couldn’t distinguish between an employee and their kids. I'm glad I keep forgetting that some people fail so thoroughly as parents that they treat their adult children as incompetents.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 06:56 AM
0

When used by women it's virtually always vulgar manipulation. When used by men it's often actually constructive advice. Men that aren't getting their cues from women, that is.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 06:49 AM
1

Only the hilarious ones!
/r/TheRedPill15/03/14 05:33 AM
5

A person can become happy by pretending to be happy. The same is true of (non-clinical) depression. Your baseline emotional state is a habit and habits are molded by action. If you need a springboard: the first step to changing your actions is to change your environment. Examples: If you can't focus then clear your workspace of all clutter. If you are fat then remove all unhealthy and/or high-calorie snacks from your home. If you are unhappy then cut ties with your unhappy friends. Despite aspir…
/r/TheRedPill15/03/14 03:57 AM
1

Oh no, but not SRS. Pity the wretches addicted to self-righteousness and drama. And since we were okay with young women, clearly we are promoting sexualization of even younger women or some shit. Logical fallacy: slippery slope. It's also rhetorically powerful because hedging in the right moment can have a huge effect. It's like "where there's smoke there's fire" thinking but direct. I don't know how to combat it without destroying the liars' reputations. Anyways, they started pulling a dox out …
/r/TheRedPill13/03/14 06:16 AM
5

Yeah, that's rape. Knowingly fucking someone too drunk to form memories without good reason to believe they're OK with it (like an ongoing relationship and no contrary statements) is where "too drunk to consent" lies. The key here is that she's way less drunk than him and he's drunk enough to not be able to reliably resist.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/14 02:49 AM
20

Marriage isn't a bond between two human beings. It's a bond between the State and two human beings.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/14 02:43 AM
3

Do you have details? I thought I was banned here but it turned out to just be a tag.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 09:08 AM
37

The dark triad is cultivates by many RPers and otherwise considered a good thing yet SRSisters are far more machiavellian, narcissistic, and psychopathic as a group than almost everyone here and certainly everyone here, collectively. They're also far better at maintaining cognitive dissonance since they wrap it all in their Moral Crusade. Seriously. How many RPers have even tried (nevermind succeeded) to destroy someone's life because of disagreeable things they said online? SRSisters have succe…
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 04:59 AM
1

Right, hypoagency. Sadly, feminists extensively promote hypoagency in women and hyperagency in men. It would be strange if they weren't hypocrites though.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 04:48 AM
1

People cannot tell the difference between a misogynist (hostile sexism) and an egalitarian (no sexism) unless explicitly told that an egalitarian man is egalitarian. A study was done that found this though I don't remember its power. So yes, women are so used to being treated better than men that they think being treated like a man is the same as being hated. That's how privileged they are.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 04:42 AM
1

I answered all of those questions as strongly agree. They just asked if it's wise. I can't imagine someone being like "oh this blackmail is unwise to even remember!" Even if you don't intend to ever use it, shit could go very wrong and that bit of blackmail saves lives. Throwing out perfectly serviceable tools that aren't weighing you down is just fucking stupid.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 04:36 AM
1

They only have so much precision. If you scored perfect then you have more than everyone who scored less. I'm not sure how they would represent that percentage-wise though. Either they'd ignore everyone with scores identical to yours or scoring 100% would show you the percentage of people that also scored 100%. They probably did the former since you saw 100% but it's possible that <0.5% (yes, percent) of people scored 100% so it rounded your percentile up to 100%.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 04:33 AM
1

I managed 2% on Psychopathy. I've been putting in effort over the past year to be more antisocial. I did score high on machiavellianism though.
/r/TheRedPill11/03/14 04:28 AM
8

We don't really need women's support all that much though. So long as we can prevent more malicious legislation and build our own support networks, it's fine. It would be nice to repeal some of the worst feminist legislation but a solid dose of MGTOW ameliorates it.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 11:31 PM
5

Excellent! All they've done is raise awareness of the MRM. Until feminism breaks, MRAs in the MSM will only be strawmen. That's ok. It still drives membership.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 11:29 PM
3

That was actually quite smart. She was speaking to a group of women at the time. All this shows is that she's willing to pander. Not exactly news for a politician.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 11:27 PM
6

I would be ok with Hillary for the simple reason that it shuts down any glass ceiling discussions Somehow I doubt merely having a woman as the single most powerful individual on the planet is sufficient to shut down glass ceiling discussions. It'll just move to percentage of representation like it has in Europe.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 11:26 PM
1

True.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 06:57 AM
2

Teaching is socially useful, at least.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 04:40 AM
2

This would be far more depressing if I hadn't already swallowed the red pill. Almost devastating, depending on how fast my rationalization shields popped up.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 04:39 AM
3

From a skim, they all look true. They're also incredibly basic. Good for people who are presently very weak-minded.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 04:34 AM
1

Depends on their male role models. If they're raised in most of America then yeah, father figures are uncommon and their mother would be BP so he will be too, with high probability.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 04:31 AM
5

I'm inclined to agree with you because that seems to be a pattern in successful human societies: fathers get involved with their sons when they start being useful. Around eight years of age should be enough but twelve is a good number. A father should still be available enough to act as a role model though. I'm not sure how best to design a father-daughter relationship. I get the impression from those I know that strong father-daughter interaction throughout childhood is useful.
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 04:29 AM
4

That's what I mean. He was mocking people who communicate by conveying feeling by framing his statement with the facade of "I feel" but actually conveying information (you're incompetent at writing SQL).
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 04:24 AM
2

I thought that was the point of his statement...
/r/TheRedPill09/03/14 12:28 AM
1

Downvote me to hell ya pseudoscience faggots Fuck you. You're right about the rest though.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/14 04:07 AM
8

I don't know about porn stars making millions. I highly doubt that they're making enough money to retire from in the small amount of time that these women are relevant in the porn industry. I'd venture that even if they did, they wouldn't save anywhere near enough. Only young women are successful in porn and young people rarely handle money well.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/14 04:01 AM
1

No you don't. Just make sure to tilt your head the correct amount (slightly up).
/r/askTRP07/03/14 06:45 AM
1

Heh, this may explain why one of the more self-aware women I know thinks she has a blood sugar problem when it's incredibly unlikely. She's really just moody from hunger or perhaps lack of food-induced endorphins.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/14 06:34 AM
4

It's said here that women have a dual mating strategy: beta bux and alpha fux. It's also so that men have a dual mating strategy: wife and girlfriends.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/14 11:04 PM
2

Actually, men are less fertile with age*. Less likely to impregnate and more birth defects. But still a man can father healthy children in his 80's. Men cycle through sperm quickly but women only have one or so eggs per month. The gender-specificity is in the particular ways fertility declines with age in that women decline until a hard cutoff while men taper off. * Yes, they adjusted for the women's age. First thing I checked.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/14 08:07 PM
1

Thanks!
/r/TheRedPill02/03/14 01:21 AM
4

Thanks for your much-needed insight.
/r/TheRedPill02/03/14 01:00 AM
6

I know more MtF women that use bitcoin than women-born-women that use bitcoin. I am dead serious.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/14 11:07 PM
2

Player haters.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/14 11:06 PM
6

Not that any of this matters anyway, we all know Dogecoin is the future. Damn straight son.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/14 11:05 PM
2

Yeah you buy bitcoin to get into it. Technically you can mine it too but that's highly specialized now.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/14 11:03 PM
1

There aren't any feminist spaces that aren't censored.
/r/TheRedPill01/03/14 10:12 AM
2

Once a year at this point but my friend told me I could do monthly. Thanks for the info!
/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 09:12 AM
3

Ah, I figured that comment was a redpiller of the community.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 08:30 AM
2

Monthly rotation.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 08:26 AM
1

I get way more intense when I focus on something and completely oblivious to everything else. Not sure how that factors in here.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 08:25 AM
1

Ha, exactly what I was thinking when I saw that.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 08:24 AM
1

I'm not sure how they actually differ, going by the definitions google provides. My assumption is that greed is the hunger for more utility without caring about how it affects others while envy is the hunger to deny others something more than the desire to possess it oneself, though possession is still secondary.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 08:23 AM
1

No, that's fine. I don't want to get too engrossed in anything redditesque or I'll drown in it :) I agree with you about sympathy and empathy inspiring each other. Not absolutely but they do seem to cause each other. Personally I think I am more prone to feel empathy than sympathy since that's how I approach my self but they do bleed over anyway.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 08:19 AM
2

No worries.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 08:16 AM
1

It's actually very helpful for me to articulate my thoughts in writing. Otherwise I more often fail to notice where I'm making utterly unfounded assumptions.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/14 08:16 AM
0

No, sympathy can be the feeling pity or sorrow at another's misfortune. The others' emotions are irrelevant, just their circumstances. Sympathy can also just mean empathy though. Anyway, since I can't read that study I can't comment on whether or not it's saying what you claim it's saying.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/14 06:38 PM
1

Huh? I read about an ancient philosopher's beliefs. They were pretty good ones too. Plus I had to think to figure out how his beliefs actually map to reality. I don't consider that a waste at all.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/14 06:36 PM
2

Teenagers aren't really children. That we today infantilize them is really beside the point.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 07:48 AM
1

Heheheheheheheheh. It's been brought to court. Sperm-jacking is completely legal in the US.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/14 05:57 AM
2

He said sympathy, not empathy.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/14 05:55 AM
0

It's a stretch to say he proposed quantum mechanics, especially since he used it to explain the existence of free will. QM doesn't do that. It doesn't make the world any less mechanical. Just not deterministic*. Causality remains and free will has no place to retreat except as how humans model themselves and perhaps others. I can agree with the evolution and molecule claims. He got evolution critically wrong in that he denied the birth of new species but he did postulate natural selection. Natur…
/r/TheRedPill25/02/14 05:45 AM
0

Several people have told me that Baghavad Gita is an amazing text but I don't get a damn thing out of it. Is there a particular annotation you use or am I just broken in this way?
/r/TheRedPill25/02/14 05:33 AM
3

Nothing but she's unlikely to be seeking out genuine friendship. Most women's platonic relationships with unrelated men are not real friendships in the sense that men have them. There's little give-and-take. Mostly she takes and he gives. You can befriend women but you do have to filter out the shitheads more than you do with men.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/14 05:19 AM
2

Hahahaha... me too.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/14 05:14 AM
1

Can confirm.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/14 05:13 AM
2

We don't disagree. I was speculating on why women both gang up on men and fight among themselves.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/14 03:04 AM
2

I thought we were ignoring SRS subreddits.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 01:12 AM
1

You feel guilt because you are disobeying your programming aka social conditioning. Guess what? You were programmed to be used. At best a bluepill man is a treasured tool. Usually, he's disposable. That guilt is some manipulative bullshit intent only on hurting you for the benefit of others. Also, learn stoicism. You can control your emotions to an immense degree. You just need practice to first learn how to control not suppress emotions and second honing that control.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/14 12:54 AM
-1

Tit-for-tat, however, is an extremely viable long-term strategy for solving the iterative prisoner's dilemma.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/14 12:51 AM
-1

Tit-for-tat, however, is an extremely viable long-term strategy for solving the iterative prisoner's dilemma.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/14 12:51 AM
0

Tit-for-tat, however, is an extremely viable long-term strategy for solving the iterative prisoner's dilemma.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/14 12:50 AM
3

Wouldn't it be thin from all that running in place?
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 10:48 PM
3

There has been research showing that women side with women against men. I'm not sure of the exact circumstances they used but my guess is that the Sisterhood is only active when there's an explicit disagreement where siding against men is an option. If women are fighting over a man then there is no Sisterhood. If there are no men then there is no Sisterhood.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 10:44 PM
3

Can confirm.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 10:42 PM
8

My tentative hypothesis is that they put way too much stock in words. When the hamster merely acts wrongly, they support it. When the hamster speaks wrongly (eg asking for an open relationship, not just cheating then crying about it) they don't support it.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 10:42 PM
43

Her cardinal sin: greed. She had a boyfriend, an apartment, money enough to vacation for months. But that wasn't enough for her: she needed to fuck more guys. Party harder. It blinded her to the conditions of her wealth: principally fidelity. Ah well.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 10:37 PM
7

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=meXzynCCT0I#t=160
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 10:25 PM
7

full video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gAYL5H46QnQ
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 10:16 PM
6

Rationalization, esp. a woman's rationalizing her behavior as justified. also: lurk moar or read the sidebar
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 10:14 PM
1

Haha yeah. It's cool though.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 09:56 PM
9

Sure. I am glad you gave me the context. I was accusatory only because I wanted you to engage instead of leaving. Not that I know jack shit about you - that's just how people seem to act.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 02:57 AM
11

That's marginally better but in no way makes her out to be anything but a misandrist. Thanks for the source.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 01:00 AM
10

Hmm. I don't see any of that context you say exists so I don't trust you.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 12:19 AM
1

Most of these aren't bad but this is clearly written by a woman, judging by #11.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 12:18 AM
1

shitredditsays. There's is a scummy and bitter place of social justice bullies. Just ignore KJL13.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 12:10 AM
1

While I agree, I do think other types of attraction are crucial. I purposefully told a shitty joke and still got laughs from a woman who was already attracted to me, like, an hour ago.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 12:08 AM
4

Louis CK at least had some groupies. He did an AMA where he described turning down a young woman because he saw a girl that reminded him of his daughter. Turns out that girl was on reddit. Or lying. Whatever.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 12:06 AM
2

I think social proof might factor in more than physical beauty though. I've made women laugh their asses off even when I was incredibly unattractive but I was known to be funny and others (aka men) were laughing. There's variation, of course. The most solipsistic woman I know only ever laughed at my attractive friend's comments but he was never funny, just insulting. She just couldn't grasp that he was being mean to her... which is of course funny in its own way.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 12:05 AM
1

Congratulations.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 12:03 AM
2

Bonobos are way more open about sex though. They use it to calm aggression and shit. Here, sex is still done in private. I haven't actually read The Way of Men though so you may be accurate.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 12:01 AM
2

It is exactly a matriarchy. Women control the households and maternity is more important than paternity. Feminists fucked up the definition of patriarchy but these terms still mean something.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 11:58 PM
1

No more commas for you.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 11:54 PM
3

[meta] You can either show a link or show writing e.g. "Got a good chuckle out of this." Reddit doesn't allow both.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 11:52 PM
22

True, they don't explicitly believe that. They implicitly do in all of their significant actions.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 11:47 PM
3

Agree. But don't discount the fact that the reason men approach women in the first place is because they liked what they saw, not "I bet she has a nice personality!" Absolutely. That's because women, especially attractive women, never have the need to develop the skill to be charming; they flirt through life based on their looks. Absolutely.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 11:45 PM
2

Your actually isn't a contradiction to my statements though. They're not even really related. Excellent TIL though. Any sauce?
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 11:23 PM
6

Before you've met the girl, yes. Girls can be charming though. They're just overwhelmingly not.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 11:22 PM
1

Here's where I brag that my mom was RP but sadly, I never listened to her. Fucking feminist indoctrination.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 10:22 PM
1

Well shit, I wouldn't go to them solo either but that's due to needing someone to help protect/hold the good booze. Seriously, they only serve pisswater.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 10:20 PM
4

"Like" is an oversimplification. Women side with women against men. Men side with women against men.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 10:16 PM
4

Oh definitely, I'd go with your rhetoric when talking to most women. Subtlety requires an existing foundation to build off of.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 10:03 PM
0

That strikes me as so odd though. Obama has acted exactly as I expected him to: pure status quo.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 09:53 PM
12

Actually, beauty is not solely skin-deep. Most of it is but some women have a way about them that is way more intense than otherwise equally attractive women. On the high end I'd rate it 2 SMV points but it's at least a 1. Even more-so, depressed women are unattractive. I know two women that look damn near identical but only one is attractive.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 09:47 PM
4

My mind always goes to celebrities when I hear women bitch about getting so much attention that a lot of it is unwanted.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 09:44 PM
4

If I wrote such a letter, it would read "You go, brother!" Bitching about others' good fortune is such shit.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 09:42 PM
1

It isn't a universal problem. My office has only mild drama. Most of the women are winners in life so that may be a factor.
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 09:38 PM
2

Wasn't there a woman who like took care of him or something that became hot for him?
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 09:35 PM
1

I take it she was in one of the few states where 16 wasn't legal?
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 09:23 PM
1

The big distinction I promoting is that capitalism and the free market are wholly separate concepts. Free market socialism has the social mobility of free market capitalism without the drawback of separating people into owner and labor classes. There would still be difference in individual and family wealth though. If a person is way more productive than others then they'd still be way wealthier than others. But being the son of someone useful would confer way less benefit than it does under cap…
/r/TheRedPill19/02/14 06:02 PM
0

"Change yourself" has such negative connotations. How about "work out", "learn to tell humorous stories", and "learn to confidently speak your mind". Like it or not, women are sexual and respond to specific cues, same as men (though the cues themselves differ). If you look at exercise and social skills as temporary to gain attention in the dating scene meat market then you would only succeed at short-term relationships/ONS. It doesn't at all sound like that is your intent. Doing things that you …
/r/MensRights19/02/14 05:52 PM
1

Why would they? Democracy is mob rule and feminists control the narrative.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/14 05:45 PM
1

Then he derides the (at the time) vice president for just being someone that wants a fancy title aka a name for himself. "For some people it's the size of the chair."
/r/TheRedPill19/02/14 05:43 PM
1

I don't see free market socialism being that oppressive. Wealth would be too spread out to form meaningful classes. Free market capitalism would be that oppressive though.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/14 05:41 PM
0

That at least is somewhat plausible.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 05:38 PM
2

5 Having sons reduces the likelihood of divorce Their explanation is that men stick around more when they have sons because men who did so reproduced more. This seems confused because it's overwhelmingly women that initiate divorce. This may not have been true historically (I don't have the numbers) but I don't get the impression that the author has really thought this through. They're just using stereotypes ("common sense") to build theories to explain what they observe. It's bullshit.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 07:57 AM
4

That sounds like State Socialism. It failed spectacularly in Russia (fucking Stalin) but milder forms pervade the rest of Europe.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 07:52 AM
1

Heh, point. What I mean to say is that some guys I respect here absolutely cannot work well under women while several others, including myself, do just fine. I find this surprising.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 07:49 AM
0

The men were quiet, staring, almost looked scared to move You're discouraged from moving around more than a little bit or the dancers disengage. I imagine the bouncers will throw you out if it gets beyond that point but I haven't seen it.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 07:47 AM
1

Actually that's exactly how humans evolved. The limiter on our reproduction was resources, not wombs. The change happened during the agricultural revolution, which hasn't occurred long enough ago to make a significant change in our genetics. Consider that women compete for men. This is almost a unique feature of humankind.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 07:45 AM
4

Not exactly. The government MASSIVELY subsidizes women, especially single mothers. They still can't get everything they want or possibly need with it but women no longer need a man to survive. This causes a corresponding massive devaluation of unattractive but socially useful (aka has an ok or better job) men. In the past, women needed men or they starved or were vulnerable to violence. This is no longer the case.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 07:43 AM
4

Not sure how welcome /r/theredpill advice is here (I know it fluctuates a bit) but that's really bad advice. If a woman won't hang out with you for free then she doesn't really like you. But she (or some other girl) could like you. You just need to become desirable in the ways women actually appreciate.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 07:37 AM
2

It's interesting to consider those through the lens of great men of history. Bear alphas instigate radical change while wolf alphas maintain and grow. Bull alphas are courtiers if they're at all politically relevant. Perhaps this is why democracies elect and strongly encourage wolf alphas but occasionally empower a bear alpha and become a dictatorship.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 07:26 AM
3

Many women have that killer instinct - they will take you for everything you have and then toss you aside while hunting for their next mark. Possibly because they can trivially find someone who will tell them how wonderful they are and how terrible their mark was.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 07:18 AM
3

No, just normal. Like Cgn38 said.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 07:13 AM
2

Right, you're thinking of the free market, not capitalism.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 07:11 AM
2

Seriously though, a woman would have gotten far less time, if any. I present the infamous Lorena Bobbitt as evidence.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 07:06 AM
1

I love HoC because it puts me in a powerful frame of mind. It doesn't dampen my compassion but it does make me much more calculating.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 06:58 AM
4

Ah, well, I'm a left-libertarian. Also I know very little about NVC, praxeology, and general-semantics. Myself I'm a fan of empirical rationalism/Bayesian rationalism. As such I'm also strongly in favor of naked truth with the understanding that all beliefs are imperfect certainties.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 06:57 AM
11

Holy shit that was hilarious.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 06:47 AM
1

Manipulating her with her own mismanaged feelings. I love this phrase.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 06:45 AM
3

I too would enjoy reading that.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 06:43 AM
2

What I'm getting from this subthread is that some guys can get female superiors to like them and some guys can't.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 06:42 AM
1

How is that harder? Fucking charm her. d_rok is dead on.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 06:39 AM
1

If you want tax benefits so badly then form a corporation. Hahaha. "Smith Inc."
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 06:31 AM
1

How legally binding is marriage (to a woman) anyway? Moral though yeah, there's that.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 06:29 AM
13

Yup! Most people in the RP are somewhat (right-)libertarian.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 06:07 AM
2

She didn't want someone like him raising her children I never considered that. Interesting. Actually, most of what you say here is new to me. For him power is a drug I've been eager to learn why Frank wanted so much power. Especially the temporary power of the executive branch. Power as its own end as a rational pursuit is just confusing to me. But irrational or fundamental to his will makes sense.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 06:06 AM
1

Haha. When that happened I thought the owner sent her to spy on him. He was spying on him via camera, afterall.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 06:02 AM
5

Their relationship is definitely at least partly open. I can't say more without spoilers tho :/
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 06:01 AM
13

Here, though, that's a mainstream idea. Let's try this: capitalism is oppressive.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 05:36 AM
2

Wait, really? Maybe this is a man I can respect.
/r/TheRedPill16/02/14 12:59 AM
2

I can't speak to most of this article but the basic motives of white knights described therein are correct. White knights, as boys and men, seek social approval and elevation. In our society it's women that dispense them.
/r/TheRedPill16/02/14 12:34 AM
4

The article is more precise than that.
/r/TheRedPill16/02/14 12:32 AM
5

Haha. Note how when discussing why white women don't reply, they are neutral. When they discuss why white men don't reply, they call them self absorbed.
/r/TheRedPill16/02/14 12:14 AM
0

I thought you were wrong but I looked up the definition of assault. Groping lacks any intent to harm so it isn't assault. It's sexual battery at worst.
/r/TheRedPill16/02/14 12:01 AM
2

He could mean battlefield but that would weaken the poetry of his words. It sounds like he might have been a fascist. It would make sense that a fascist, as a hardcore statist, would revere war in particular rather than battle in general. I still think he means battle in general but I am not as sure anymore.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/14 11:28 PM
0

This is getting a bit far afield. My fault though. that doesn't mean "get better at deception" True. It is however necessary to learn to act contrary to ones present nature in order to improve. That's the very heart of habit change. I do advocate people get better at deception as a pragmatic matter even if they only use it for clear and present good (as opposed to ill or theoretically good ends). The blanket policy of honesty is something I took to heart as a child and it's only caused pain for …
/r/TheRedPill15/02/14 11:15 PM
6

I'm glad I overheard a conversation about myself once where an adult I respected said I needed to be more aggressive. He definitely wasn't advocating violence, either: he knew that a man must be willing to confront others to be happy in life. Sadly, English doesn't have a good word for positive aggression. Google claims it includes violent behavior inherently. Sad that our language lacks in this area.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/14 09:17 PM
0

How about body tone? A dancer's ass is just the woman's ass enhanced. Not a replacement. The sort of Game TRP espouses is much the same, really. Enhance your personality. This isn't PUA. Props for consistency BTW.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/14 09:13 PM
0

What throws people off is he's half-Japanese, so he gets a lot of attention. He's very good at continuing conversation, throwing in offbeat hypothetical situations and digging into personal questions with girls. His mystery and moodiness is undeniably attractive to women. Haha I know this guy's virtual twin.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/14 08:27 AM
2

The existence of this subreddit as rather strong evidence that at least many men here do not see everyone else as competition in "everyway"[sic].
/r/TheRedPill15/02/14 05:16 AM
1

As someone else here said, they're flinging shit until something sticks. They don't need to bother actually reading anything here to formulate effective insults when TRP is new enough that they can still hope to brute force an effective counter-meme.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/14 05:14 AM
1

dont actually know what is being advocated This is overwhelmingly true. They may also view the world as sugar and spice and everything nice but they definitely don't know jack shit about what people outside their sphere actually fucking believe. The removed view of facts is almost always heavily corrupted. Have you ever witnessed or participated in an event firsthand then later read about it? Even short pieces have multiple errors. Usually most are minor. The AskReddit post that mentions /r/ther…
/r/TheRedPill15/02/14 05:10 AM
0

Even if they were right it would be stupid for them to try to disprove the red pill. You disparage the minority belief when yours is the majority belief. To treat it with the respect of reason is to make it appear equal to onlookers.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/14 05:03 AM
0

Game isn't any more deceptive than makeup yet it deceives men into overestimating a woman's beauty.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/14 04:37 AM
8

It's something no feminist anywhere understands: places like /r/theredpill are safe spaces for some people. Feminist safe spaces are not safe spaces for the vast majority of men nor many women.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/14 04:24 AM
-1

I noticed that too. It's just natural for people to tack on extra adjectives to a strawman. When you divorce your conception from fact, a little more or less racism here-or-there doesn't consciously register as significant.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/14 04:23 AM
1

Then that's perceptive of you. I don't agree with everything you've written here (as you are now aware) but most of it is very good.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/14 04:28 PM
1

Whether or not hierarchy is beneficial isn't important, is it? High schools are extremely hierarchical but it serves no purpose. Humans seem to create hierarchies in a vacuum. Though admittedly high school is a strange enough place that it's unlikely that it's a bad example.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/14 04:11 PM
2

I'm not convinced either way if women are necessarily less logical than men. I am however convinced that women presently overwhelmingly lie to themselves and others about what they actually want in men because telling the truth would cause other women and some men to turn on them. The vogue morality is one of female purity and high naturedness, not base animal attraction. But base animal attraction never wanes as culture changes.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/14 04:08 PM
3

Nothing he said is novel in the animal kingdom, where humanity is eternally tied despite our pretensions. His problem is that he's actually managed to undershoot reality - a novel feat. You should read Robert Greene's 48 Laws of Power. Greene does a much more thorough job of explaining OP's points, with historical examples. If you don't want to learn the 48 Laws of Power (according to Greene) then you of course needn't. But even if you are a good man, you will be well-served knowing how bad men …
/r/TheRedPill14/02/14 03:51 PM
0

I read it as a minor distillation of 48 Laws of Power.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/14 03:39 PM
0

You know in your heart what you must do.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/14 03:38 PM
4

It is however extremely stupid. Maybe not beta but not in the spirit of self-improvement either.
/r/TheRedPill14/02/14 08:13 AM
1

It's a damn hypothetical.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/14 05:25 PM
8

That would be the point of this subthread. Women decreasingly offer anything but sex in a relationship - but already give out sex without commitment.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/14 05:21 PM
2

Most women don't even know about 6' looks like. 5'10" guys and above say they're 6' and girls aren't exactly measuring men.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/14 06:44 AM
2

Archer and the rest of ISIS use Krav Maga.
/r/TheRedPill13/02/14 06:38 AM
0

He fulfilled the role of non-breeding uncle extremely well. He still passed on his genes because the children he raised are his blood kin.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/14 09:49 AM
4

A woman loses weight, causing her sexual attraction (sexual market value aka SMV) to rise. Now she's way hotter than her boyfriend. She either dumps her boyfriend immediately or gets with a hotter guy and then dumps her boyfriend. She lies to herself and everyone else, spinning a story. Small sample: Her now-ex-boyfriend was an asshole. They grew apart. Their relationship grew dull and she needed more excitement. Whatever bullshit incompatibility/obstacle was there from the start suddenly matter…
/r/TheRedPill12/02/14 09:46 AM
3

You probably treat a 5 like you are already her alpha without even realizing it Well shit, you're right. Thanks!
/r/TheRedPill12/02/14 09:37 AM
2

Yup. It's not an approximation of a Turing machine.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/14 06:21 PM
1

Classic totorox!
/r/TheRedPill11/02/14 06:09 PM
1

Totally. When I first saw it I thought the daughter was massively ungrateful. While she is that, she's also right: her father's behavior fucked her up. She ties herself to the first alpha that wants her even though he's a drug dealer.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/14 02:52 AM
1

He does die happy though.
/r/TheRedPill11/02/14 02:51 AM
1

I suspect this is the actual reason. STDs and junk are good, rational reasons. Unfortunately this also discounts them because human decisions are overwhelmingly emotional decisions.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/14 08:29 AM
15

American Beauty is a story about a beta becoming alpha. There's a shitload more RP stuff going on in it though. Especially listen to what his daughter says about her father's influence on her - fucking revelation man.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/14 07:37 AM
11

I can imagine guys and girls texting an ugly celebrity just to get attention from someone "important" but yeah, guys wouldn't be texting Hillary Clinton out of lust.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/14 07:33 AM
5

That makes me incredibly sad every time I remember it happened.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/14 07:24 AM
40

Written by women, even. I suppose them making Don a broken personality underneath his alpha exterior gave them free reign to actually write a man they want to fuck.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/14 01:47 AM
2

Exactly. RPW might have a discussion of how men manipulate women but in TRP it isn't relevant unless it's a guide on how to do it, not defend against it. How men manipulate other men would be useful here though, albeit marginally. It would make more sense to just read 48 Laws of Power.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/14 01:44 AM
1

The US Revolution was also a revolution against an entrenched system of inequality. Also, class is real. Patriarchy, as feminists envision it, is fantasy. Money is a store of power that passes down generations, producing actual strata. Patriarchy can't do that because men have female children that get more-or-less the same inherited power as male children.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/14 01:40 AM
2

No, you get what you can take. The difference is immense. The rich overwhelmingly do not earn their wealth. Usually they inherit it. Occasionally they did something extremely useful to others and get rich.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/14 01:39 AM
1

Fair. I look forward to the write-up.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/14 01:37 AM
2

None of them seem to offer any contrary evidence. It's all about how this and that is a "biotruth" but they don't actually offer alternative hypotheses. They sure as shit don't try to prove social conditioning. [-] FelisEros 179 Points 15:08:39, 7 February That women naturally hate each other for being "competition". Hate may be too strong a word but women are in competition with each other. This is incredibly interesting since humans are one of the very very few species where women compete for …
/r/TheRedPill08/02/14 08:35 AM
0

Fucking meditate.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/14 08:30 AM
4

tax You're describing state socialism. Anarcho-syndicalism and even just a worker cooperative majority bypasses that bullshit while dramatically reducing inequality. Unfortunately central planning and socialism grew to prominence together so people think they're synonymous.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/14 06:28 AM
10

The point of my comment is that there are different kinds of socialism. They embodied the worst kind while the men embodied the best.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/14 06:14 AM
4

The men didn't have any leaders? That means they didn't have a hierarchy, just a collective. Did they form a hierarchy once they gained a few female members? It's interesting because it means that general male hierarchy (not just during specific missions like hunting) may be due to female interference, not inherently male.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/14 06:08 AM
8

Actually... The women couldn't get anything done because they demanded consensus for everything. When it came time for competitions, wouldn't the female strategy then be useful? They'd vote as a bloc against the men who would vote piecemeal. Or so I guess.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/14 06:04 AM
4

It shows you care. Women may not understand but other men, at least, do.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/14 06:02 AM
10

The only culture I have experienced where genders seem significantly different is Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jewish/Israeli culture Can you elaborate on this? It's extremely interesting.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/14 06:00 AM
2

or they would have invaded the other island Hahahahahahaha. That is wonderful. Thank you.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/14 05:57 AM
2

They really didn't need leaders but they DID need a mechanism to keep bullshit out. Leaders can do that though.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/14 05:55 AM
19

A little off-topic but y'all might find this interesting. The way the men acted on that island is exactly how (good) worker cooperatives work - everyone is personally responsible for the whole but operates independently. People fill out niches as they need to. This is also how startups work. The way the women acted was more like state socialism - everyone is collectively but not individually responsible for the whole. So no one took any initiative so nothing got done.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/14 05:50 AM
2

Question: Would penance work as a substitute for nexting? Obviously you'd need impeccable frame control but a sufficiently terrible penance would provide very strong negative reinforcement. Of course this drastically alters the power of the relationship in favor of the man but that's virtually always the most stable relationship dynamic anyways.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/14 05:27 AM
1

I completely agree. But I'd side with abolishing all alimony over the present situation if those were the only options.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/14 05:19 AM
2

Feminists want women to be equal to men but don't recognize 80% of men as men. So in feminist utopia, all women occupy the top 60% of society and 80% of men occupy the bottom 40%. Seriously though, feminism is not a self-critical movement. It can't ever kill itself: it has to be killed by an external force.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/14 05:17 AM
1

Isn't shitlord an anti-gay slur? I mean originally, not what SRS uses it for.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/14 05:14 AM
1

It definitely helps others. Before finding the manosphere I was definitely going to marry. Now I know how retarded that would be, at least in the West.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/14 05:13 AM
1

Are you sure you aren't just thinking about stupid psychopaths? Most people, if they lacked a moral compass, would be extremely incompetent criminals. Hell, most criminals are pathetic. The vast majority of people navigate their lives by taking cues from others. If they try to branch out then they overwhelmingly fail. If they continue at it then they can become great but criminals don't get to fuck up very many times before their lives are fucked. A successful criminal needs to either be trained…
/r/TheRedPill07/02/14 06:36 AM
1

How is that not Red Pill? It would be red pill if the reality of sexual politics were as the show presents it since red pill is whatever is true. But it's just another lie.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/14 06:12 AM
1

confidence generated by status My best guess is that women are attracted to indicators of high status. Confidence, social proof, and explicit signs of status (aka actually having high status) all count. As for wealth: I think you're right. I'm getting a bit too evo-psych without considering the evidence. As far as I can tell, women don't get hot for resource providers. They seek them out for resources and to elevate themselves over their female peers but aren't actually turned on by it.
/r/TheRedPill06/02/14 03:35 AM
1

That doesn't sound like bargaining. Bargaining would be self-improving in the expectation that you'll find and keep a unicorn. Your description of bargaining sounds more like depression.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/14 08:52 AM
2

It's sad that this is necessary. Stable relationships of any sort require balancing measures to maintain cohesion. Otherwise a small change will sever the relationship. Women in marriage can walk away but they can also emotionally withdraw, go ballistic, and involve social and/or legal controls, all without being on the losing end (relatively speaking) of relationship severance. If men take measures short of walking away then the woman can always walk away and the man loses. If he walks away fir…
/r/TheRedPill04/02/14 09:02 AM
1

She is Mab, Queen of the Winter Court.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/14 08:49 AM
1

The German title sounds way better. "Manipulated" is currently a strong word but "domesticated" is more meaningful for me.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/14 08:48 AM
1

Apparently that's rhetorically useful but I don't see how it isn't obvious to everyone that "you can't do X" means "I don't want you if you do X". People must be inferring a coercive relationship from the get-go. Which, duh, of course they are. Most people believe or pretend to believe that men can dominate women at will. That the police will arrest non-violent men obviously beaten by their wives is merely evidence and can be safely ignored.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/14 08:45 AM
1

I agree with your point, however I would say that instead of saying male visual appearance is not important, it seems more like being good looking has to be earned if you're a guy, whereas if you're Female, you just ARE beautiful, regardless of if you look like a 50-year-old rotting horse head or not. Steven Colbert earned his good-looking tag here cause he makes a lot of money and is famous. Another good example is Benedict Cumberbatch. He looks like a fucking alien but all of a sudden women ar…
/r/TheRedPill04/02/14 08:29 AM
3

Excellent point.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/14 08:15 AM
11

They actually don't believe in free speech. They mock it as "freeze peach". Free speech is only advocated by those lacking dominion over discourse and by those that consider the long-term effects of their actions. Feminists dominate discourse and are not long-term thinkers of any note so of course they attack free speech. Free speech seems to come about when different ideologies are forced to co-exist since no one ideology dominates.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/14 08:05 AM
3

Yeah... reverence belongs to people, institutions, etc that are in some way great. Defaulting to that for women is another way of saying "put the pussy on a pedestal".
/r/TheRedPill04/02/14 08:01 AM
2

Interestingly, Sparta appears to have been egalitarian (for spartan citizens, not helots): link. This is only wikipedia but the picture they paint, probably unintentionally, is of a shared will to power for the State. Men would let other men impregnate their wives to bear better sons! Crazy. You can't get that kind of arrangement without a strong shared will.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/14 07:59 AM
1

women everywhere Especially white women everywhere.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/14 07:51 AM
2

Girls couldn't graduate middle school unless they could do 20 pull-ups. This is the least believable absurdity you've listed. There's no way feminists would impose demands upon women. They'll shame them for staying home to raise their children but they still make sure such women make bank in divorce court.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/14 07:48 AM
3

Queen Isabella I of Castile was pretty important. She gave us the Spanish Inquisition plus a bunch of other important things like funding Columbus's exploration and therefore helping those subsequent genocides. Whenever feminists spew nonsense on how little power women have had but women with power would do good, I remember Isabella I.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/14 07:44 AM
3

To be fair, they've been rewriting history for decades now.
/r/TheRedPill04/02/14 07:35 AM
1

Stick to OCEAN. It's empirically grounded.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/14 03:41 AM
10

I still wouldn't call it irrevocable consent but it is a good policy for women to avoid separating from the group in an intimate setting with a guy they don't intend to fuck. There just aren't better ways to prove non-consent.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/14 03:28 AM
5

I'm not aware of any rigorous testing that would prove the theory of frame I've been figuring out from reading here but this phenomenon you mention does make sense in its terms. Being RP means having a strong frame. When two people interact, the will behind the stronger frame alters the will behind the weaker frame. A red pill man's frame is much stronger than the vast majority of people, including women, so a woman in a relationship with a red pill man would become more red pill herself.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/14 09:33 PM
21

Nowhere does she consider that lowering standards of proof would harm non-rapist men. She is right about the difficulty in proving non-consent but fails to consider that women, being human, overwhelmingly lie when convenient.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/14 09:28 PM
4

This really belongs in asktrp, not here.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/14 09:24 PM
4

Being tall and athletic doesn't make one alpha... They just raise SMV.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/14 08:05 PM
8

Wouldn't Harry have been a better provider though? What with being rich and all.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/14 08:04 PM
3

That... makes Hermione sound an awful lot like my childhood. To my credit I've thrown out blind adherence to rules but damn if this wasn't exactly me: I also get a powerful impression that very early in childhood, Hermione learned to reflect back to her parents the sort of intelligent, “responsible” projection which has enabled them to effectively cut her loose to raise herself. And they have largely treated her as an honorary adult ever since, displaying a level of trust in her that I think is …
/r/TheRedPill02/02/14 08:03 PM
2

Yes they do...
/r/TheRedPill02/02/14 07:32 PM
6

No, you worded it fine. The OP set a trend of deriding any nice-seeming advice so others are following suit. In another thread you'd have been upvoted.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/14 07:25 PM
5

Offense is taken, not given. Damn straight.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/14 07:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter