TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Florient Archive

View 95 posts and 358 comments by Florient on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2985

UnconfirmedFlorient/r/MensRights15/07/18 04:40 PM
2293

DiscriminationFlorient/r/MensRights20/02/19 03:07 AM
2252

Social IssuesFlorient/r/MensRights28/04/16 04:01 AM
712

IntactivismFlorient/r/MensRights11/06/18 04:15 AM
284

Social IssuesFlorient/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:57 AM
227

Florient/r/MensRights16/04/19 04:04 PM
223

Legal RightsFlorient/r/MensRights30/10/19 06:34 AM
173

FeminismFlorient/r/MensRights26/01/19 02:12 PM
172

FeminismFlorient/r/MensRights04/06/18 05:10 PM
133

False AccusationFlorient/r/MensRights11/06/16 03:44 PM
110

Social IssuesFlorient/r/MensRights19/06/16 03:06 PM
105

IntactivismFlorient/r/MensRights16/04/16 07:23 PM
97

GeneralFlorient/r/MensRights27/04/16 02:39 AM
76

DiscriminationFlorient/r/MensRights01/11/19 07:35 PM
62

Florient/r/MensRights27/03/19 01:56 PM
60

GeneralFlorient/r/MensRights26/05/16 01:55 AM
57

DiscriminationFlorient/r/MensRights09/07/18 04:04 PM
51

Global IssuesFlorient/r/MensRights10/04/19 12:42 AM
50

FeminismFlorient/r/MensRights02/09/16 08:47 PM
46

Activism/SupportFlorient/r/MensRights17/04/16 12:06 AM
44

False AccusationFlorient/r/MensRights03/02/19 01:00 AM
44

GeneralFlorient/r/MensRights10/06/16 08:08 PM
43

Florient/r/MensRights13/07/16 07:57 AM
41

IntactivismFlorient/r/MensRights21/01/19 02:21 PM
40

Social IssuesFlorient/r/MensRights19/04/16 11:53 PM
40

GeneralFlorient/r/MensRights22/06/16 04:46 PM
39

UnconfirmedFlorient/r/MensRights15/11/18 05:08 AM
30

Social IssuesFlorient/r/MensRights25/04/16 05:45 PM
29

DiscriminationFlorient/r/MensRights24/02/19 04:08 PM
28

Activism/SupportFlorient/r/MensRights17/04/16 07:36 PM
28

Legal RightsFlorient/r/MensRights08/08/19 06:52 AM
26

False AccusationFlorient/r/MensRights27/10/18 07:24 PM
26

QuestionsFlorient/r/MensRights13/05/16 09:36 PM
26

GeneralFlorient/r/MensRights01/10/18 05:27 PM
25

GeneralFlorient/r/MensRights08/06/16 08:54 PM
21

FeminismFlorient/r/MensRights11/06/16 04:14 PM
20

Social IssuesFlorient/r/MensRights11/10/16 08:31 AM
20

GeneralFlorient/r/MensRights03/05/16 01:19 PM
19

GeneralFlorient/r/MensRights26/05/16 07:30 PM
19

Social IssuesFlorient/r/MensRights11/10/19 06:59 PM
19

Social IssuesFlorient/r/MensRights02/10/18 05:54 AM
18

Florient/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/10/19 07:00 PM
18

FeminismFlorient/r/MensRights03/06/16 05:33 PM
17

Activism/SupportFlorient/r/MensRights21/05/16 04:52 PM
16

Social IssuesFlorient/r/MensRights07/01/19 09:34 PM
16

GeneralFlorient/r/MensRights22/06/16 02:41 PM
15

Social IssuesFlorient/r/MensRights10/06/16 02:37 PM
14

GeneralFlorient/r/MensRights15/06/16 09:30 PM
14

IntactivismFlorient/r/MensRights18/04/16 02:24 AM
14

GeneralFlorient/r/MensRights27/04/16 08:20 PM
13

Legal RightsFlorient/r/MensRights21/01/19 02:31 PM
12

GeneralFlorient/r/MensRights29/05/16 11:56 PM
12

Activism/SupportFlorient/r/MensRights27/05/16 04:04 PM
11

FeminismFlorient/r/MensRights22/06/19 02:24 PM
10

GeneralFlorient/r/MensRights23/07/16 07:59 AM
10

GeneralFlorient/r/MensRights28/10/18 03:04 AM
10

Social IssuesFlorient/r/MensRights12/07/16 11:02 PM
9

Florient/r/MensRights03/09/16 12:27 AM
9

QuestionsFlorient/r/MensRights24/05/16 08:42 PM
9

IntactivismFlorient/r/MensRights05/05/16 03:23 PM
9

DiscriminationFlorient/r/MensRights05/05/16 02:52 AM
8

FeminismFlorient/r/MensRights09/06/16 11:56 PM
7

Social IssuesFlorient/r/MensRights28/06/16 03:01 AM
7

GeneralFlorient/r/MensRights04/05/16 05:25 PM
6

Social IssuesFlorient/r/MensRights07/07/16 04:03 AM
6

Activism/SupportFlorient/r/MensRights01/06/16 09:08 PM
6

GeneralFlorient/r/MensRights10/06/19 03:36 AM
6

GeneralFlorient/r/MensRights25/04/16 02:13 AM
6

Social IssuesFlorient/r/MensRights21/06/16 09:25 PM
5

QuestionsFlorient/r/MensRights24/06/16 07:57 PM
5

GeneralFlorient/r/MensRights20/05/16 06:48 PM
5

FeminismFlorient/r/MensRights27/07/16 07:00 AM
4

Activism/SupportFlorient/r/MensRights20/04/16 08:59 PM
4

GeneralFlorient/r/MensRights27/07/16 08:11 AM
3

GeneralFlorient/r/MensRights26/04/16 07:21 PM
3

Social IssuesFlorient/r/MensRights19/06/16 04:47 PM
3

GeneralFlorient/r/MensRights22/06/16 01:13 AM
2

GeneralFlorient/r/MensRights10/06/16 03:36 PM
2

Social IssuesFlorient/r/MensRights22/05/16 12:39 AM
1

FeminismFlorient/r/MensRights21/06/19 11:54 PM
1

HumourFlorient/r/MensRights19/01/19 12:16 AM
1

Social IssuesFlorient/r/MensRights11/06/16 10:44 PM
1

Social IssuesFlorient/r/MensRights14/12/18 04:39 PM
0

FeminismFlorient/r/MensRights10/06/16 12:53 AM
0

Social IssuesFlorient/r/MensRights27/09/16 09:34 PM
0

GeneralFlorient/r/MensRights26/05/16 01:26 AM
0

FeminismFlorient/r/MensRights10/09/16 07:32 AM
0

FeminismFlorient/r/MensRights02/06/16 08:46 AM
0

Activism/SupportFlorient/r/MensRights06/06/16 01:36 AM
0

GeneralFlorient/r/MensRights28/07/16 05:18 AM
0

Social IssuesFlorient/r/MensRights26/06/16 06:15 PM
0

GeneralFlorient/r/MensRights04/06/16 07:01 AM
0

GeneralFlorient/r/MensRights08/07/16 08:47 PM
0

GeneralFlorient/r/MensRights05/05/16 12:36 AM
0

IntactivismFlorient/r/MensRights30/06/16 12:42 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
16

This guy went to hospital for brain damage because 3 women assaulted him and he 'wouldnt hit them back'. i would have hit them back. i dont care if you have a vagina, i dont want brain damage, its your fault if you assault me and im not going to let you hurt me.
/r/MensRights07/11/19 05:18 PM
86

This is what a feminist society would look like. I find it impossible to believe a ( year old girl would be left alone like that.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 06:46 PM
1

i actually like the poster though, i mean tis true and giving men fair warning about the reality of the situation. its honest. and will also make people think and question it
/r/MensRights17/10/19 01:44 PM
2

There's a complete doublethink when it comes to this, and whether or not saying 'men and and women are biologically different' is sexist. It's hypocritical because the same people who say it's a sexist gender stereotype to say women are physically weaker are the ones who would call for this change- why? What is the difference that justifies the change?
/r/MensRights14/10/19 03:22 PM
6

this is a step towards dehumanizing white men and creating them as an 'other' class. like scary, separate people who are to be feared. like, how is it acceptable to do this? its outrageous
/r/MensRights11/10/19 03:45 PM
2

this is something that is "normalized", or even seen as comedic, but very much a valid form of controlling behavior
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/09/19 09:36 PM
3

"How dare you touch women" this attitude is just crazy even win stories were a woman blatantly is assaulting/harming a man. like we are just supposed to "accept" physical harm.
/r/MensRights15/09/19 03:52 PM
1

it's insane that a male being assaulted by a woman has to be more concerned about the comfort and safety of his attacker than about his own.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 02:54 PM
7

this is what happens when "white male" is conditioned as a separate and lesser class than "regular" people
/r/MensRights30/08/19 04:56 PM
2

No, deadliness is absolutely not a stat. What does it mean? Is it time to death from diagnosis? Is it overall mortality? Long term survival? Morality rate? Mortality only in downtown Chicago when mercury is in retrograde? Who the hell knows. Specific, technical words that convey precise meaning exist. Deadliness is not one of them. This is ridiculous, you know exactly what's meant by "deadliness" in this context, total number of deaths. your trying to derail the debate with semantics. Oh man, yo…
/r/MensRights24/08/19 05:43 AM
2

Answer the question. You have not answered before. If prostate cancer has a relatively low mortality rate and high survival rate compared to other cancers, then how is it the second biggest cancer killer of men?
/r/MensRights24/08/19 05:43 AM
4

You're jsut going in circles and not making any sense. You did NOT quote me correctly, you intentionally tried to change what i had said. let try and do this another way" If prostate cancer has such a high mortality rate compared to other cancers, then how is it possible for it to be the second biggest cancer killer of men?
/r/MensRights24/08/19 05:30 AM
4

No, it isn't. And "how deadly" doesn't mean anything at all. how many people die from cancer definitely means something...that is what it means. what are you talking about? So no, you specifically said more serious cases are more numerous than most other cancers. Which as you can see from the reply I made is not true. no, not what i said. i said number of cases that result in death are more common than number of cases that result in death for other cancers, with mathematically must be true if pr…
/r/MensRights24/08/19 05:00 AM
4

Deadliness doesn't mean anything at all here. It's absoulutely not a statistic. It's a buzzword, clickbait, etc. what?? this is ridiculous, how can deadliness not mean anything when talking about cancer deaths?? that makes no sense...of course its a statistic, its a measurement of many people die from a type of cancer... Actually, for this you still want to look at long term survival rather than annual mortality rate. No you wouldn't, if you wanted to save the greatest number of lives you'd look…
/r/MensRights24/08/19 04:56 AM
4

Yes, it does. That's why total number of deaths is such a misleading number, because it falsely paints a disease as much more threatening than it actually is. What? This makes absolutely no sense at all, there's nothing "false" about the total number of deaths, that's literally the most pure statistic you can have. Total number of deaths reflects the overall chance a person has of dying from something (in this case prostate cancer) how can it possible not? (me): "Prostate cancer is the second bi…
/r/MensRights24/08/19 04:42 AM
5

No, it's really not Yes, it really is. Total number of deaths is absolutely the best way to measure how deadly a cancer is... but 5 year survival is a more practical and useful stat for a variety of reasons. And no, advaned prostate cancer is ~10% of new diagnoses, or about 17.5k. That's less than cancers of tongue, colon, rectum, liver/biliary, pancreas, lung, skin, bladder, kidney, non hodgkin lymphoma, leukemia, etc. That's not what I said, I said prostate cancer has a higher total number of …
/r/MensRights24/08/19 04:00 AM
4

the vast majority of men are diagnosed above age 65 & live for decades with the disease. But this doesn't take into account the fact that because the prevalence is so much higher, the total number of deaths might be still higher, despite the majority of cases being slow growing. It's this- just because there also happen to be a large number of less serious cases doesn't somehow diminish or "negate" the more serious and deadly cases. If those slowly growing cases never happened, the mortality rat…
/r/MensRights24/08/19 03:43 AM
5

Would you rather have pancreatic cancer (5 year survival 7%), or glioblastoma (5%) or ovarian (40%), or cervical (66%), or breast (90%) or prostate(96%)? It's a straight up fact that you are more likely to die with a prostate cancer than from one This is a bad way of looking at it, this ignores the prevalence and the total risk a person has of doing from a particular cancer in their lifetime. As you see from the OP post, prostate cancer kills 31,000 a year, cervical cancer kills 4200. Cervical c…
/r/MensRights24/08/19 02:57 AM
6

While prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer deaths, the actual mortality rate of prostate cancer is pretty low. The total number of deaths is the more relevant bit. The mortality rate isn't really the best way to measure a cancer because you have to compare the sample size to- prostate cancer is like this because slower growing cases are very common, but the more serious cases are still more numerous than most other cancers. On average, 90+% of prostate cancers are local or regio…
/r/MensRights24/08/19 02:54 AM
5

And don't forget, men are not protected from sexual assault under law. And it was feminist groups who campaigned against the exclusion. So when they ask "oh, why are MRAs always talking against feminist"? this would be an example of feminist groups directly working against equality, unlike MRAs.
/r/MensRights23/08/19 04:01 PM
2

I’d be wary of his coverage of trump; it’s usually dishonest and disingenuous just like this segment was
/r/MensRights20/08/19 02:21 PM
3

As noted, I think it's extremely unlikely they even tried to measure how many hugs each study participant received every week, or how emotionally spontaneous they felt they were allowed to be . come on, those things arent gonna cause a 500% increase. it looked at lifestyle factors such as smoking, diet, exercise, work, etc. the much more improtant factors
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/08/19 07:21 PM
4

I don't call myself left or right or anything else; I take a look at the facts of things and decide what I think about it. It's gotten so screwed up with SJWs being how they are, there's no truly comfortable place.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/19 08:24 PM
48

Things like this seem small, but they are small steps in conditioning people to be "ok" with discriminating against males. Why don't men have their own bathroom? Why not make both bathrooms gender neutral? What psychological effect will this have on children? Why will they think males don't get their own bathroom? It seems like a silly issue but it's bigger and potentially more harmful than it appears. It's a gradual process of dehumanization
/r/MensRights17/08/19 09:55 PM
3

virtually all rough sleepers in the UK are white males because the councils have been taken over by feminist ideologies who push intentionally manipulative and disingenuous guidelines for housing that make it impossible for a white male to qualify. it's done purely out of hate and spite, and you can tell that just by looking at the attitude here. why would they be laughing? what is funny about this? the man giving the rude and dismissive response was the assistant mayor for housing! he should kn…
/r/MensRights17/08/19 05:24 PM
1

This seems small, but it's not- it's a small step towards a larger trend of conditioning people to see men as "lesser", it;'s dehumanizing/demoralizing tactic. It suggests that men don't deserve their own bathroom, like they are a lower status of person.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 04:52 PM
1

shes a psychopath without the charm of kamala. she just sees it as a play. smart move actually, but i dont think people will buy it
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/19 02:21 AM
6

oh, absolutely. i think it'll inevitably come to a head; the SJW ponerology would never have a legitimate MRA wing, but regular people will eventually notice. i think there's a large segment of people on the so called "alt right" who are really just fleeing from the SJW toxicity. they are labeled "reactionaries" which isnt really fair because of the connotation, but somewhat true because that is what's happening i see things as much murkier than others do...it's not really a binary right vs left…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/19 06:22 AM
9

Ok I like it in theory, she’s a self described intersectional feminist...do you trust it? I think it’ll be like a menslib thing
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/19 03:04 AM
5

this is what feminist culture is. it is fostering a mentality of hate and extremeism against men
/r/MensRights08/08/19 08:23 PM
13

menslib restricts what men can express based on how well it aligns with feminist theory. feminists talk about "toxic masculinity" being how men cant express themselves, but then try to dictate what men should and shouldnt be allowed to say in a space for men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/19 09:21 PM
0

MRAs will always be attacked, the SJW movement is a ponerology- a network of psychopaths. They have completely infiltrated the left and never operate in good faith.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/19 04:30 AM
2

he and his sub are very disappointing. vastly overrated and very minimally intellectual, IMO
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/19 03:24 PM
1

it seems like the incel "phenomena" is mostly an online thing, rather than something common in the real world. ive never seen or heard about it except from other people talking about it
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/08/19 02:04 AM
5

IMO, we shouldnt use the word "retard" like this
/r/MensRights29/07/19 10:49 PM
5

This is awful, and if done without consent, it was sexual assault.
/r/MensRights28/07/19 12:39 AM
9

you'd want to avoid menslib IMO, it's a "pro feminist" sub to the degree where criticizing feminism isnt allowed. feminism basically "controls" the sub. i'd say social media. twitter, facebook, just test the waters, make mild observations and see how people react. work little things into convos with friends, see what they think. build from there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/19 08:41 AM
7

I don’t think it matters, it’s not the point. You wouldnt say it’s ok to cut off a finger because cutting a hand off is worse, would you? MGM can cause death, permanent loss of function, and is , by definition , mutilation. All that needs to be said IMO
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/07/19 05:55 PM
3

There's definitely a degree of intentionally disingenuous organization behind it; you always see people using exactly the same phrases and analogies in a way that's impossible to be organic. People are learning "scripted lines" and than repeating them elsewhere. There's a name for this kind of social manipulation, it's called milieu control Milieu control involves the control of communication within a group environment, that also may (or may not) result in a significant degree of isolation from …
/r/MensRights18/07/19 07:05 AM
8

The title is exactly right; they have scripted lines to use during debates. “I no longer wish to continue this discussion “ is a common one, when they know they are losing. They know facts and logic are overwhelmingly on our side, so fair and discussion is against their interests.
/r/MensRights17/07/19 03:20 PM
1

There is still a gap. A woman working and earning the same as a man and retiring at 65 will get the same pension as the man, while retiring at 60 will get the pension proportionally reduced. But there is the choice that a man doesn't have; and even if a woman retires at the same age as a man, a man still has a shorter life expectancy (at any age) so the point stands. You're also not accounting for the factor of how work can contribute to an earlier death; men don't have the option of retiring ea…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/19 04:03 PM
0

which is why I've grown to secretly despise women, perhaps men even more. I'd be careful there, that's unhealthy thinking. and the MRM is anti-misogyny, so that way of thinking would be against we were are about. think of it in relative terms. imagine how many people are affected by terrible things, and have been in history. things worse than theyare now-slavery, genocides, etc...they could hate everyone else, but if you were from the country reasonable for those things, would you feel personall…
/r/MensRights13/07/19 03:05 PM
26

Along the way, she asked women a question: “What do we need men for?” How about the vast majority of farming, physical labor, factory work, sanitation, etc. wtf does this even mean?
/r/MensRights02/07/19 11:21 PM
7

this is more than a joke; it's a reflection of how society is accepting of violence against men. people wouldnt tolerate this ifthe genders werereversed, but this is considered "funny"
/r/MensRights22/06/19 02:31 PM
1

I listed 3 areas of evidence that have overwhelming historical evidence and plenty of remnants today. In fact the evidence is so overwhelming I question your sincerity here. It seems more like a rhetorical move to push the burden of proof on to some strawman of a feminist. Except a modern day snap shot, say in the US, would not reflect "male privilege" as described by feminists in sensible way. It's grossly impractical and one-dimensional train of thought. I would recommend you spend more time b…
/r/MensRights21/06/19 11:39 PM
1

None of this is true. That is arguable. But you're implicitly accepting my point and making the claim that the intent is there but implemented badly. Are we actually disagreeing? The intent is NOT always there, and even so, that is not a sufficient reason to oppose an MRM. It's up to feminism to decide what men's issues are and how they should be addressed, especially when the track record for such has been so poor, it calls into question the intent. They can make the case based on historical an…
/r/MensRights21/06/19 10:56 PM
9

Word count doesn't speak to the context of what is being said, the accuracy and said posts, etc. So it's a useless metric to measure two subs of very different size and moderation policies. Menslib removes posts that aren't aligned with feminist theory; how can that be a sub for "mens liberation"? Why should a women's movement dictate the words used by a men's movement? And by what metric is the author using for his conclusions? When he interprets what usage tendencies of certain words imply, wh…
/r/MensRights19/06/19 08:12 AM
11

I mean his presentation of the data and the following interpretations. From reading either the study or his post on ML it’s screamingly obvious that the authors have a bias. Just look at his comments in the thread. To say that ML addresses gender roles more than MR just because of higher frequency of use is very disingenuous. Even if ML has more instances of the words physically being typed, is the context accurate or productive? Talking about something more or less doesn’t mean the quality of d…
/r/MensRights19/06/19 07:37 AM
7

No. His presentation and analysis of the data is very flawed So in order to make the point that a scientist is biased, the onus is on you to say "this is the piece of evidence that the guy overlooked" or "this is the alternate hypothesis that didn't get considered." No, there are other ways to demonstrate bias. In his case, it's selective intepretation. A reasonable analysis wouldn't favor ML over MR. It's a very disingenuous and cherry picked piece of work.
/r/MensRights19/06/19 06:52 AM
8

the author is posting in menslib now; he very clearly has a biased against MR. go read the thread there, he posted it
/r/MensRights19/06/19 06:33 AM
6

IMO the theory of “patriarchy” is a very incomplete description for that reason, it’s so not so black and white as “who is in positions of authority .” It’s a very incomplete concept.
/r/MensRights14/06/19 05:14 PM
10

She sexually assaulted a child...a man sleeping with a woman who had too much to drink would be given multiple years for rape, but not her, who did something much worse?
/r/MensRights06/06/19 02:18 PM
25

Honestly, an absurd argument. The population of the world is over 7 billion. Any continent could be lost tomorrow and we'd still have far more people than we need for the "survival of the species." A man on low food rations can survive, but a woman that's pregnant can lose the child if not healthy. Not a reason not to feed men. Now this may seem unfair but in a disaster women are more important than men due to their ability to have children. Not relevant in any scenario where the human populatio…
/r/MensRights22/05/19 07:56 PM
16

if we lived in a system designed to benefit men, then why is it that: boys perform worse in school and are given lower grades for the same work men are less likely to attend university men have a higher unemployment rate men are more likely to be homeless men receiver longer prison sentences for the same crime. in what society is the privileged class treated more harshly? in many countries, men have a higher pension age and are forced to work longer so it doesnt hold up logically
/r/MensRights12/05/19 03:21 PM
16

the MRM is politically neutral, and nothing to do with liberal or conservative. i think there are two reasons why people make this assumption: anti-MRAs try and paint the MRM a certain way and associate us with the "alt right" feminists/SJWs are undeniably on the side of liberal parties/politicians, so there will be inevitable overlap overall i really like how the MRM stays neutral and pure to what we are, a mens movement
/r/MensRights12/05/19 03:03 PM
2

menopause is not an equivalent of low testosterone. its not even close,actually, low T can be debilitating to a vastly more significantly degree
/r/MensRights11/05/19 11:21 PM
7

She loves false narratives and disingenuous wordplay. No one here is against safer workplace, we are against false accusations and undue gender biases!
/r/MensRights11/05/19 06:55 PM
1

Society as a whole seems to be slowing waking up. Even if people still fall for anti-MRM propaganda, they still feel that something is “off.”
/r/MensRights11/05/19 06:51 PM
5

A woman killing a white man in the UK? Probation.
/r/MensRights11/05/19 06:48 PM
26

It's inherently biased and one sided, it's based of assumptions about feminist theory being 100% true as if it's scientific fact
/r/MensRights11/05/19 06:26 AM
4

two tiered justice system
/r/MensRights11/05/19 04:04 AM
6

Feminism is a women's movement, and it's not up to them to decide what male issues are, and how they should be addressed. It's about them. We need a MRM that actually addresses on male issues based on the lived male experience
/r/MensRights11/05/19 04:03 AM
41

Just to note, Denmark is one of the countries with male only conscription, it's definitely a country with MR issues.
/r/MensRights10/05/19 01:37 PM
6

They just make this stuff up; they write theories and use their own papers as if they are academic sources. It's absurd.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 03:15 PM
3

Good. False accusations *do happen, much more commonly than feminists say. They can send someone to prison, and rapists are often targeted for violence in prison. A false accusation is a very serious crime that can cause great harm. It's not to say rape accusations should be taken less seriously, feminists have made it a nonsensical zero-sum game.
/r/MensRights09/05/19 03:13 PM
4

Yes! There are many female MRAs. Karen Straughn and Cassie Jaye are two notable examples.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 02:58 PM
17

It's so hypocritical. Why do feminists get to "decide" that a men's movement doesn't deserve a voice? Why do they get to decide that we can't present our own issues, especially since feminists ignore them?
/r/MensRights08/05/19 02:53 PM
12

Cassie Jaye is awesome, what she did opened her to criticism, but she did it anyway because it was right.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 06:34 PM
34

Men are paying the same tuition, this is inexcusable. We live in a time where blatant sexism against men is just accepted, it's just men are second class citizens.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 06:33 PM
27

It's presented as fact, but it's not. Feminists just invent these theories and buzzterms, and then expect conversations to just happen as if they are inherently true. That's not how it works.
/r/MensRights07/05/19 06:32 PM
4

Some of the countries that are considered to be the most "feminist" or "gender neutral" practice male only conscription, like Austria and Finland. It always seems crazy to me, how to people not notice this discrepancy? How does it not stand out to people? when feminists always talk about wanting to "abolish gender roles", yet ignore conscription?
/r/MensRights06/05/19 02:23 PM
14

We don't, it's one of the ways they smear us. they've created a completely fictional premise of the "alt right" and label anyone who goes against their narrative
/r/MensRights06/05/19 04:20 AM
3

did you not read my comment? that's why I specifically said, it wouldn't be blatant seizure or theft, it would be via taxation, fees, etc. I literally justsaid that
/r/MensRights04/05/19 04:25 PM
5

But back on point. What is there to suggest that the assets of men will be seized and distributed to women? Please, just give me something The pattern of behavior from feminist groups and individuals. Obviously I can't send you evidence of something that hasn't happened yet; it is given, given her ideology, a plausible enough likelihood to feel concern. Again, we don't really have to debate it because we'll find out soon enough. I think its more likely than not to happen. It'll be something subt…
/r/MensRights04/05/19 04:20 PM
24

its funny how feminists enforce gender roles when it's beneficial to women
/r/MensRights04/05/19 04:10 PM
14

you'd cant be serious.... lets start with your own country. feminist protested against equal pension age. And yes, I read the article and understand the argument, it doesn't work me and I disagree with it because IMO it doesn't make sense. This is feminists directly protesting equity under law. it's now the legal standard to exempt women from prison for many crimes that men would receive prison for. again, I've read the arguments and understand and sympathize with them, but they simply do not wo…
/r/MensRights04/05/19 04:09 PM
8

Do you really not see the moderndaySJW feminist movement as a radical and toxic movement? look at past examples of bias laws feminists have supported. protests against equal pension ages. protests against alimony reform. protests against exclusion of men for protection of rape laws. extreme rhetoric from mainstream figures, student union leaders, university officers, etc, to killwhite men, ban white men from speaking, etc. it's so blatantly obvious if you look objectively, im honestly not even s…
/r/MensRights04/05/19 03:33 PM
3

Obviously he can't give you a link to prove a prediction of the future. We're saying what we believe is likely to happen in the future, we don't the evidence now. It's conjecture, and IMO a reasonable one.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 03:16 PM
3

He's already explained, and if you "disagree" you haven't been paying attention. A feminist being in office is what we see to suggest seizure of assets, going by past patterns of radical and toxic behavior and ideology. Put the pieces together. In either case, wait and see, my guess is within a year it'll happen. Save this comment, if you like.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 03:15 PM
4

Feminism is now in power. I wouldn't be surprised to see laws of mandatory seizure or transference of male assets, under the guise of a "redistribution" plan or something.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 03:13 PM
5

"We don't need an Mens rights movement because feminism addresses male issues and patriarchy to." No.
/r/MensRights04/05/19 03:12 PM
10

Caning in Singapore is used for males only
/r/MensRights03/05/19 11:01 PM
8

If the genders for this were reversed, it would be considered a major social issue. Feminists would say it's the most significant male privilege of all, and demand massive government action and funding for research.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 10:17 PM
7

Men in the UK have to wait longer until they can retire, and are punished more harshly for the same crime. IMO they are entitled to it.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 07:43 PM
50

Statistically, he is wrong. Girls already receiver higher grades for the same work. Men are less likely to attend university, more likely to be unemployed, and more likely to be homeless. There's no actual evidence or data that women in the West have harder lives. In fact, data would suggest that the opposite if true.
/r/MensRights03/05/19 05:55 PM
178

We should raise money for her to have a televised speech; we can stream it here to. Provide her a shirt saying "this is what a feminist looks like", we can make up shirts with her picture and quotes on it.
/r/MensRights30/04/19 05:06 AM
6

agreed. trump was/is the anti-SJW choice. they are literally fascist and psychopathic and MUST be stopped. id rather live in castros cuba than an total SJW world
/r/MensRights17/04/19 02:07 AM
1

this is the wrong place, the MRM is no connected to incel movements in anyway
/r/MensRights31/03/19 04:20 AM
23

well i dont agree with that, id vote for a woman if i preferred her as the candidate
/r/MensRights20/02/19 06:47 AM
33

This being MR, I’d like to keep the political/partisan element out. It’s the gendered comment this post is about
/r/MensRights20/02/19 04:25 AM
1

You've triggered the hambeasts at AMR with this post. a badge of honor
/r/MensRights19/02/19 06:45 AM
8

And the social norm is for men to be expected to stand and give seats to women because women's comfort is valued over men's
/r/MensRights13/02/19 03:40 PM
6

But the failure of the GS to improve programs isn’t the fault of the BSA. And to now have girl o my troops in BSA, when at the same time complaining about the “misogyny” of boy only troops, it’s extremely hypocritical
/r/MensRights10/02/19 08:34 AM
10

But why the need to integrate the BSA to begin with? Why not form activities and troops with the Girl Scouts for the girls who wanted those activities? They obviously had the number/interest
/r/MensRights10/02/19 05:28 AM
1

It's what holding an invisible SJW brain would look like.
/r/MensRights08/02/19 04:04 AM
31

What she did is what feminists say is the equivalent of FGM. She's being praised and called the victim, it's disgusting.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 02:54 AM
21

This is going to get worse in an increasingly SJW society, hostility against men. female entitlement under law, no prison or arrest for crimes, etc.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 09:05 PM
16

we cant do that, we have to be the ones to call this out and try and help the problem
/r/MensRights26/01/19 02:32 PM
4

why not?
/r/MensRights22/01/19 06:31 PM
8

We already are; men's issues affect men of every race, we look at the gendered aspects of said issues
/r/MensRights22/01/19 02:54 PM
15

it removes the frenulum, ridged band, and majority of meissners corpsucles.
/r/MensRights21/01/19 03:00 PM
3

collegiate male bias do you not read very well? saying thisdoesnt make any sense, what do you mean by "collegiate male bias?" think about it, college graduates earn more money than non-graduates. if there are more women than men with college degrees, it would make sense that women earn more than men on average. this is one reason why we see this trend. it starts from grade school, and carries on throughout high school. lower grades and a higher dropout rate in high school obviously leads to lowe…
/r/MensRights12/01/19 02:45 AM
2

its definitely not blaming women as a whole; its the toxic SJW ideology that encourages thoughts like this tweet/post whatever it is
/r/MensRights06/01/19 01:45 AM
2

of course, but I bet they disproportionately do. and what I said was "this is what a feminist looks like", which is true.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 10:09 PM
9

This is what a feminist looks like.
/r/MensRights05/01/19 03:19 PM
1

again, you seem to have not read the post As for the health insurance vs car insurance comparison, one difference is, health care is considered more of a basic need that every human is entitled to. There is no such assumption regarding driving a car. try actually reading the post, see if you can spot where you're going wrong. I can highlight for you if you still have difficulty
/r/MensRights29/12/18 03:25 PM
2

did you not read my post? I literally broke down why: Men choose to drive recklessly due to our higher propensity to take risks. This causes us as a whole to be a statistically more risky insurance customer and thus the business chooses to charge us more Is not a sensible argument for higher rates. You are basically arguing that women should be forced to pay more than what they should have to in order to subsidize the recklessness of men. That is basically the same as telling businesses to hire …
/r/MensRights29/12/18 03:24 PM
1

its like you didn't even read the post. Consider that this argument used to be the justification for charging women higher health insurance, but recently, it was made illegal to do so...so if it's a valid argument there, why isn't a valid argument for car insurance? Secondly, consider how that argument would apply to a man working minimum wage- he cannot possibly be earning more than a woman working in the same position. address these points.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 01:32 PM
1

This is not discrimination, as market forces would cause men to shift to the cheapest insurance policy. Respectfully, did you even read OPs post? the entire post is deconstructing the very argument that you gave. weret he genders reversed, the justifications wouldn't be accepted, and the reasoning isn't fair or sound to apply at an individual level. if men get in higher accidents, charge higher rates retroactively. its discrimination by any reasonable metric.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 01:29 PM
19

psychopath eyes, learn to spot them and you can start recognizing them instantly. 1-2% of the population.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 01:18 PM
5

that's not a valid comparison. there are zero restrictions on job choice on an individual level except for special forces, .001% of the population. car insurance rates are not, and are applied by absolute default. so, one is a default; one is not. that's a rather significant differences.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 12:18 AM
66

Feminists talk about how female sexuality is ignored and people don't understand the female body, but its the other way around...doctors are given the job of performing an irreversible surgical technique on baby boys reproductive organs without even being trained on how just imagine SJW nurses and doctors being assigned to circumcisions, making it more painful for fun... ther are NO standards for it, its absolutely crazy
/r/MensRights21/12/18 11:37 PM
5

but are you vodkakitty?
/r/MensRights03/12/18 01:56 AM
9

Men have been conscripted to die as teenagers for the same time; men have always been the primary victims of violence. We also know you're vodkakitty.
/r/MensRights03/12/18 01:04 AM
2

IMO its crazy that one half of the population is expected to just let themselves get hurt if someone from the other half of the population decides to attack them. throwing glass at someones face could cause permanent injury- why shouldn't I be able to stop them? why should I have to prioritize me attackers comfort over my safety?
/r/MensRights11/11/18 10:10 PM
0

that's true, but its not true that trump didn't send aid, because he did: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/hurricane-maria-water-bottles-puerto-rico_us_5b9980eee4b0511db3e8ec3f https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-09-28/mountains-of-aid-languish-on-docks-in-storm-stricken-san-juan as trump said, PRs infrastructure was old and outdated. the media accused him of "blaming" them, but that's not blame, its just how it was. it will take time to rebuild properly. even new jersey hasn't full…
/r/MensRights06/11/18 09:49 PM
1

looking at your post history..oh boy have you brainwashed into believing a perspective that isn't true. you know things like saying trump ignored Puerto rico after the hurricane and his tax cuts didn't help the middle class are lies, right?
/r/MensRights04/11/18 08:52 PM
2

So? The point stands, whether or not the judge was a man is irrelevant.
/r/MensRights15/10/18 08:03 PM
1

you think you're making a point of telling me to talk to women as if im a misogynist and don't, right?
/r/MensRights08/10/18 05:35 AM
2

the words and actions of mainstream feminist organizations suggest otherwise. feminists protested equal pension ages in the uk, conscription in Norway, for example. feminists promote gendered domestic violence laws that discrimination against male victims. feminists have suggested separate legal systems for women and closing womens prisons entirely. mostly, feminism wouldn't fight against the very existence of a mens rights group, unless they opposed mens rights. if they wanted equality, they wo…
/r/MensRights08/10/18 05:23 AM
4

Ford listed 3 witnesses, and all 3 failed to corroborate her claims Ford couldn't remember how she got home, despite only having 1 beer not ONE other person remembers the party, or house, or event. the other 2 accusers had no proof and their stories quickly feel apart. it is objectively obvious that the accusations are not true.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 05:20 AM
1

Russia also has male only conscription, and a higher state pension age for men. why do you ignore those when analyzing the state of Russian gender equality?
/r/MensRights08/10/18 05:15 AM
6

Did you not read the post? OP worries about false accusations, which happen all the time. So your comment, logically, doesn't have a foot to stand on.
/r/MensRights08/10/18 05:14 AM
5

I think its absurd how men are expected to just hit their attacker hurt them. why? why should I be more concerned about my attackers safety and comfort than my own?
/r/MensRights29/09/18 05:17 PM
1

I don't believe the new accusations either. they realize the first one isn't being believed, so they invented a second. very transparent and obvious imo
/r/MensRights24/09/18 03:57 PM
3

Don't give feminists an inch on this topic. Shut down any counters they have- it isn't about them, it isn't related to FGM, and it isn't a sensible debate.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 12:48 AM
1

Actually, rates of more aggressive cases are on the source
/r/MensRights10/08/18 12:33 AM
1

Rates of aggressive prostate cancer are on the rise
/r/MensRights10/08/18 12:32 AM
1

This is misleading. Prostrate cancer still kills a higher number of men in younger age brackets relative to other cancers. It’s kust that there are so many cases, the mean is skewed. By the raw number of deaths is higher in anyway. Personally I don’t think you can justify spending less to research the health of the gender that dies younger.
/r/MensRights10/08/18 12:29 AM
1

Yeah, the MRM really isn't about talking about "jews" like that. This isn't the place for it.
/r/MensRights08/08/18 03:25 AM
12

yo get out of here with that, we don't support views like that here
/r/MensRights07/08/18 09:39 PM
1

This is your last post because you are uncomfortable with how I am so easily dismantling you and embarrassing you on this thread :) You write nonsense for people to come back and read, and you think making it read well will make people think it's true. But it's nothing. Also, I didn't say that. You're talking about someone else.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 05:56 PM
2

It is very obvious and transparent that you have anti social personality disorder and are not here in good faith. Part of the defection of the psychopath is being unable to comprehend how ineffective they are at conversing in an adequately typical manner- being of inferior mind, it is difficult for you to write without your defection being immediately evident.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 05:55 PM
1

Ah, you're ASPD. You all sound the same, such is your defection :) It must be a shame knowing your brain is broken- does it bother you knowing you were born less? That you're so easily manipulated? That people can instantly read the weakness in your eyes and know not to see you seriously? That would bother me immensely. I feel sorry for you. That's a false statement. And its easily disproven in less than a minute on google. No, that is NOT correct. Googling does NOT prove that false rape accusat…
/r/MensRights06/08/18 05:50 PM
7

Oh! Manipulative anti MRM trolls are coordinating another attack! How nice. It's very sensible in this context, actually. Mansplaining is often brought up in conversations to dismiss any opinion that goes against a feminist narrative, beyond the sensible context of the definition you provided. Even if that is the technical definition, that is not how the word is used in practice exclusively.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 05:47 PM
9

The fact that the red pill documentary is considered hate speech or pro-discrimination is beyond absurd- what is hateful about it? What is untrue? It's an excellent documentary, as far as I concerned the more people see it, the better.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 01:08 AM
2

Yeah, sorry but this isn't a comment that belongs here
/r/MensRights17/07/18 06:24 PM
1

That's...blatantly untrue. There are many signs that have obviously been printed; scroll through any pictures of similar marches, or others from this march, and you will see such signs. You saying that now makes you question whether or not you are having this discussion in good faith. It is extremely obvious by . There isn't even room for discussion here, and you know it.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 11:24 PM
1

Her left hand would be holding the bottom corner. The fuzziness is in line with the mixed focus of other points in the picture; there are lots of spots you could point to that look a little blurry. I’ve looked at it closely, I don’t see that it looks fake.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 08:13 PM
1

Lots of comments insisting that it's fake...based on what, exactly? Where is the evidence that it's fake? I honestly don't see anything unusually when I look at it.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 03:32 PM
1

I have a good graphics on my laptop and I just zoomed in and studied it and I don't see that at all...can you be a little bit more detailed?
/r/MensRights16/07/18 03:31 PM
0

People think this is a point but it isn't- psychopaths (the core of SJW feminism) don't have attachment or feelings towards family members either, that brain of the brain simply isn't wired in psychopaths.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 06:39 AM
3

Really? What do they say? You should post a picture here!
/r/MensRights16/07/18 06:26 AM
8

The anti trump march in London this past friday
/r/MensRights16/07/18 06:26 AM
6

You’re being disingenuous and manipulative, and you know it. Your comment is nothing and doesn’t make any sense. There’s literally no reason to assume this picture is fake, and your comment just doesn’t make any sense. You’re here because you’re an anti MRA using the same (boring) word tricks and manipulations SJWs do. In your own words, explain what your comment actually means. We know it’s not organic, you didn’t just “come up” with it, you learn what to say from somewhere else and repeat it.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 06:25 AM
4

Why does that make it fake? Different people having different signs...so what?
/r/MensRights16/07/18 03:09 AM
18

Mass execution.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 03:08 AM
5

In what way? Not saying you're wrong, but what about it makes you think so? I don't see it.;
/r/MensRights16/07/18 03:08 AM
18

But what proof is there that this isn't real?
/r/MensRights16/07/18 03:07 AM
9

Sorry, but in what way is Trump promoting fascism? You're falling for media propaganda, I'm surprised an MRA wouldn't catch that. I don't think this should be a political sub or pro/anti trump in anyway, but consider who is behind these anti trump marches and protests, and dislikes him the most- SJWs. That should tell you what you need to know. This picture is from the anti-trump march. That's the kind of sign that side supports- ban white men. That's the side you want to be on?
/r/MensRights15/07/18 10:07 PM
15

Not saying you're wrong, but I can absolutely believe they'd have a sign like this, it's how they think. There must be thousands of pictures of the March somewhere where this sign would come up, we'll see.
/r/MensRights15/07/18 07:39 PM
2

Careful with how you word that comment, someone might screenshot and edit it out of context.
/r/MensRights10/07/18 02:34 AM
7

The reality of male privilege- you have to just "take" violence, even if it isn't your fault. And feminists really think it's because of misogyny that no one will date them?
/r/MensRights01/07/18 05:46 PM
10

And just a reminder, feminism claims to "help men to" but is the primary force preventing this issue being discussed. They use FGM to derail the conversation, even though it should have nothing to do with the conversation.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 07:12 PM
3

The irony and lack of self awareness to use “mansolaining” seriously in this article...
/r/MensRights12/06/18 04:16 PM
2

What it is is feminism is controlled by psychopaths, the true SHW type has anti social personality disorder so do not feel any empathy.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 02:59 PM
4

Considering their attitudes towards men, who can be surprised?
/r/MensRights05/06/18 08:45 PM
1

Right, but what you said was entirely nonsense and incoherent, so I counted it as failure.
/r/MensRights05/06/18 12:52 AM
14

Psychopaths are unable to understand how a normal thought process feels like. Their defection leads to arrogance, and blatant mistakes.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 06:06 PM
29

This is not really about the uniform, it's more psychological subversion. It's subconsciously conditioning the idea that boys are lesser people by blatant and non-sensible treatment. It's part of a million little states towards the true second class citizenship feminists aspire to
/r/MensRights04/06/18 02:49 PM
1

Lol nah, I'd say OP took your argument apart piece by piece and dismantled your argument pretty well. You failed to address the study on childhood cancers, which more or less wrapped the argument up.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 02:19 PM
3

Interesting, can you elaborate?
/r/MensRights02/06/18 08:59 AM
1

Different classes of citizenry. Men are the lower class. So if a disabled man can't find a disabled spot, he has to walk longer because he's a man?
/r/MensRights02/06/18 08:55 AM
3

Oh, on the contrary, they know what they are doing, they are intentionally disingenuous.
/r/MensRights01/06/18 06:08 AM
7

It's incredibly hypocritical for the same ideology that invented the term "mansplaining" to say that a men's movement should only be allowed to operate under the rules of a women's movement
/r/MensRights01/06/18 03:11 AM
2

In a way, I think this could be great- this may be exactly the sort of push needed to make people realize how dangerous and wrong feminism is, and how necessary and right MRAs are. When every bit is introduced the idea at the age of 14, I suspect MRA ranks to swell. This is pure bigotry and hate indoctrination, and its very hard to convince people to see it as anything but.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 08:01 AM
11

What? No it's not, there are millions of boys without access to healthcare and education, and it's not nearly as disproportionate towards girls as feminist claim.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 03:23 AM
11

The "never hit a woman" societal rule has resulted in women feeling immune to use violence, as there is no incentive not to.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 07:01 PM
1

I would have assumed it's very obvious that any MRA strongly opposes Hillary Clinton, yes?
/r/MensRights27/09/16 09:48 PM
3

1/3 of Americans Aren't caucasian, a fraction that's only going to grow. And "dodgy Mexicans?" Man, that's exactly the kind of racist-sounding thing I'm talking about. Many caucasians, myself included, are very put off by this sort of thing, and by how Trump speaks. The MRA movement is supposed to be the movement of absolute equity, fairness, and true social justice. I like to believe that we're the ideology of the moral high ground, and I don't want to see that b become tainted.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 09:46 PM
1

There can be a tremendous amount of lobbying and pressuring however, and outside factors can definitely affect sentencing, such as in the cases for OJ, the officer who killed Michael Brown, etc.
/r/MensRights16/09/16 05:17 PM
4

Awesome. I bet feminists pushed hard for the reduced sentence.
/r/MensRights13/09/16 02:24 AM
1

huh? sorry but what is that and what does it have to do with me?
/r/MensRights10/09/16 04:27 PM
-1

What do you do with evil people? I think you have to destroy them.
/r/MensRights03/09/16 04:46 AM
2

This is because feminists in the UK fought to create what's essentially a separate legal system for women, and they're working on closing all women's prisons outright.
/r/MensRights03/09/16 04:28 AM
11

Well she isn't and OBJ is a top 5 NFL receiver who is out of her league. So what's the problem.
/r/MensRights03/09/16 04:26 AM
1

The necessary reaction will be a difficult one to convince enough people to do. But I'm ready and willing.
/r/MensRights03/09/16 04:25 AM
1

You should start something up where you are!
/r/MensRights03/09/16 12:36 AM
4

But why do they want to?
/r/MensRights03/09/16 12:14 AM
2

I once walked around London with a large sign, right down Southwark....the looks and comments I got, man.
/r/MensRights06/08/16 02:07 PM
15

These feminists are true sociopaths, truly evil. They go out of their way to hurt efforts to help male victims....why? What's the benefit?
/r/MensRights06/08/16 02:03 PM
6

Maybe what we can do about it is on the streets rather than online.
/r/MensRights06/08/16 01:52 PM
1

yes, but they're doing so in a way that at least acknowledges that MRAs are sometimes absoutely dead on and unfairly criticized, and that feminists are often completely wrong and very arrogant about it. watch it, i'd be curious to see what you think. its better if you start from the beginning but it gets rreally good in season 2
/r/MensRights28/07/16 05:49 AM
1

making her look ridiculous, completing lampooning an archtypical SJW type.
/r/MensRights28/07/16 05:36 AM
1

except feminism does directly counter balance men's wellbeing- fighting to make it much harder for men to get employment, or to allow women impunity for commiting crimes against men, is directly hurting me. hillary's plan of automatic lesser jail sentences for women hurts me becasue now a woman thinks "theres nothing to deter me from robbing that guy at gunpoint, or committing fraud and wiping out a mans life savings, because at most ill get a few months and community service." same goes for som…
/r/MensRights28/07/16 03:59 AM
1

Yea, watching the whole thing, it could almost be seen as pro-circ, or at the very least, not exactly mocking. Maybe not the best taste, but I can't see Mila going for mocking it like that.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 07:04 AM
3

I'm literally watching the show now, it's great. Overall the writers take a very south park approach, take no prisoners. They mock MRAs but they mock feminists to.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 06:54 AM
5

Radical political feminism is very well organized in the UK. They completely control the council system in London, which is why virtually 100% of homeless people you see on the streets are white men, and its impossible for white men to get into housing or shelters. And it was a feminist MP who tried passing the homelessness fine last year. https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jun/05/hackney-council-drops-threat-to-fine-rough-sleepers These people are sociopaths and truly evil. They have no c…
/r/MensRights14/07/16 06:37 AM
1

Are you from Los Angeles?
/r/MensRights13/07/16 08:06 PM
31

unwanted or uninvited physical or verbal contact or engagement, So, it's legal for woman to approach men, but illegal for men to approach women? And would this apply to a man asking a woman directions? Also, filming in public place- it's legal, but can a woman now demand that a man stop filming her? Would it be legal to record a female police officer abusing her power? This is really scary, what will the world be like for men in 20 years if this isn't stopped?
/r/MensRights13/07/16 08:01 PM
1

Nothing online as of yet, we're not "officially" launching until Sept. 1, which will coincide with the announcement of the UCLA and USC student unions. For now, we're really just testing the waters, circulating our name a bit, introducing ourselves, build a bit a mystique . Build it up almost like you would a movie, this is hollywood after all!
/r/MensRights13/07/16 04:41 PM
1

We don't have anything public online yet, we're starting low key. We will though, you can bank on that.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 02:51 PM
3

This movie will be a bomb, critics will hate it, the cast and feminists bloggers will blame misogyny, and society will inch one step closer to realizing how delusional they are.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 07:22 PM
1

Perfectly put.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 06:51 PM
6

SJWs are trying to turn men into the monsters they claim we are. Pass laws to make us unemployable, teach children that we're evil from school, turn us into second class that people distrust- it becomes socially acceptable to bully white male children in school, see homeless white men on the street as being "where they belong", white men banned from hospitals....this happens over decades, and it'd started.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 04:52 PM
3

And of course, feminists won't say a word about it. Because they do not care about body autonomy or equality. Feminism is literally the opposite of anti-sexism ad bigotry.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 05:38 AM
2

I see your point, but looking at her history she doesn't seem remotely feminist. She supported the equality act which was flawed, but had this measure Employment where there are cultural sensitivities (such as a documentary where male victims of domestic violence need to be interviewed by a male researcher, or a gay men's domestic violence helpline). She also undid a particularly feminist-esqe piece of policy Harriet Harmen installed, and anyone who undoes work by Harmen isn't working for femini…
/r/MensRights11/07/16 04:45 PM
1

This is what feminists do at their conferences and organizations- they teach young women in university to join government agencies and rise to positions of power so they can do things like this.Feminism should be seen like a political party in how they operate.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 02:59 PM
4

I like Theresa May. She says the things she has to say, like women earning less (which lets not forget, on paper, is still true) because she has to talk like a politician and "play the game", so to speak. The fact that she acknowledge this part: f you’re a white, working-class boy, you’re less likely than anybody else to go to university. says it all to me. Would a feminist or anybody remotely pro-feminism EVER say that under ANY circumstances?
/r/MensRights11/07/16 02:55 PM
3

Eh, I think that sounds like her giving necessary lip-service. She's smart and knows she has to play the game. I like her, personally.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 02:53 PM
1

The doublethink and hypocrisy of this is beyond outrage. It's literally exactly the opposite of "gender equal" and "equal rights", she's essentially suggesting changes in law and police procedure entire based on gender rather than circumstances. Women would be able to commit domestic abuse against men with legal impunity. It's pure evil, and really shows that feminism is nothing more than a hate group.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 02:50 PM
1

This is why I'm always saying it wouldn't be hard for us to do the same thing in return, all we need is better organization and coordination.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 02:41 PM
1

In reality ,this is when we're told we're not being hired. I've been told TWICE "We aren't hiring males."
/r/MensRights11/07/16 02:40 PM
3

Feminists don't realize how transparent they are. It's obvious that they're doing this because they are cowards and they know they'd never win a fair debate.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 02:38 PM
2

That's a good point, students should organize a motion to the title IX office.
/r/MensRights10/07/16 04:00 PM
11

So I've talked to a Compsi student from ASU, and this is somewhat misleading. The course cse205 has over 500 spots, this is for only one class of 40 people for that course. The other courses are all open.
/r/MensRights10/07/16 05:51 AM
31

A clear violation of title IX. Male students pay the same tuition, why shouldn't they have the same access to services.
/r/MensRights10/07/16 12:39 AM
2

Anyone can take action to prevent being victims of crime! It's just ridiculous, what's wrong with common sense tips to avoid being raped/mugged/robbed/killed? I take steps to avoid confrontation, why should it be any different for this?
/r/MensRights10/07/16 12:36 AM
36

The Duluth Model is completely broken. O no, it works exactly the way feminists designed it to.
/r/MensRights10/07/16 12:04 AM
6

Black men fair worse in virtually every category *life expectancy *graduation rates *homicide rate *employment *homelessness So yes, I'd say it's a very valid connection, and the men's rights movement does far more for black lives than feminism or BLM does.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 10:00 PM
-1

Check my comment history. I'm the furthest thing from an SJW.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 09:05 PM
29

This why I ignore feminists who whine about gender roles and misogyny. They clearly don't care and bring it upon themselves.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 05:36 PM
23

And this is such a key problem in the black community, yet another way feminism only hurts blacks in the US, and BLM is a fraud.
/r/MensRights07/07/16 02:03 AM
2

The most extreme branch of the new SJW-feminism is radical lesbianism....now this doesn't mean any woman who is lesbian, it's a very small sect of tumblr-sorts, who have become so delusional from spending time in their echo-chamber where killing and hating males is ok, that we get things like this.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 11:29 PM
15

This story could be a definition of female privilege.
/r/MensRights05/07/16 01:23 AM
4

I've this debate with feminists before. They love pushing the "prostate cancer is deadly" because they love to misrepresent the facts. Prostate cancer is the biggest cancer killer of nonsmoking men. Yes the survival rate is high, but because the cancer is so common, the number of deaths is still high relative to other cancers. It's like how 10% of 1000 is more than 50% of 100, even though 50% is a larger percent than 10%. Prostate grows slowly, yes, but starts young, so by the late 60s men are d…
/r/MensRights03/07/16 03:50 PM
4

Female privilege.
/r/MensRights01/07/16 03:38 AM
2

It's both a happy thing to see male victims of domestic abuse receive recognition, and sad that we consider it a pleasant surprise. The really sad thing is that feminists would probably protest.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 04:17 AM
5

And not a single feminist protest. I wonder why?
/r/MensRights29/06/16 12:42 AM
2

So, what explains males having lower grades in every subject at every age, a lower graduation rate, and a higher unemployment rate? In a way, these kinds of articles are almost encouraging because it shows how petty, ridiculous and intellectually hollow feminism is.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 12:20 AM
22

Because that's not the kind of sexism they mean, they're only referring to sexism that's inconvenient for them persoanlly.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 02:04 PM
6

That's true, because the stronger immune system can backfire in rare cases.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 01:11 AM
3

Yes, men feel the same cold or flu worse than women do, so if you have the same cold as your wife, you will feel worse. http://www.iflscience.com/health-and-medicine/man-flu-appears-be-real-estrogen-helps-women-fend-virus/
/r/MensRights26/06/16 12:54 AM
24

Actually, science suggests yes, although it's strange- a study suggests flu vaccines are less effective for men with higher levels of testosterone. https://consumer.healthday.com/infectious-disease-information-21/flu-news-314/testosterone-may-undermine-flu-shot-s-effectiveness-for-men-683335.html However, it's interesting to note that you almost NEVER hear about NFL players missing games due to illness, and indeed, former NFL players recount that they almost never got sick during their careers, …
/r/MensRights26/06/16 12:39 AM
4

This is very true.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 12:24 AM
-2

The arrogance of modern day feminism is simply mind blowing.
/r/MensRights26/06/16 12:07 AM
127

O definitely. Women are more empathetic, more intelligent, better readers, more altruistic...all because of science. Show a study that suggests the reverse is true, and suddenly it's misogyny and patriarchy. It's a convenient tool of feminism.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 09:15 PM
1

That's my theory to.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 08:18 PM
1

I know what globalism is means, but I'm not sure what the relationship is to SJWism.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 08:17 PM
0

Interesting, can you elaborate a bit?
/r/MensRights24/06/16 08:08 PM
0

And the question is, under Hillary's "gendered prison reforms", does this include female rapists?
/r/MensRights23/06/16 07:56 PM
2

Very good read, thank you.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 04:16 PM
1

That won't save the dead.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 01:15 AM
3

Men who worked long hours had a higher incidence of arthritis, but none of the other chronic diseases. Because the rates are already so much higher for men to begin with. Basic rule of arithmetic exponential property.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 05:30 AM
5

It's obvious you're not an MRA.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 12:20 AM
2

Do you honestly not realize how obvious it is that you're not an MRA, and posting this to make us look bad. Please stop, you're not intelligent.
/r/MensRights20/06/16 12:10 AM
3

Feminist: "Because they are weaker!" Me: "...o....really? What do you mean by that?" Feminist: ......
/r/MensRights19/06/16 10:21 PM
4

Pregnant women are a bit different, you really can't risk any physical harm to the baby. You did the right thing.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 07:15 PM
11

This is why "never hit a girl" needs to stop, immediately. I'm sure feminists would defend these two girls, and in fact these two girls probably identify as feminists- but how would they feel if this happened to their own son or brother?
/r/MensRights19/06/16 02:08 PM
3

Feminists will say you can't blame them for conservative males holding old-school trends of thinking that female rapists arent "real rapists." Ok, fine. But I CAN blame feminists for suppressing efforts to raise awareness for male rape victims, such as in stories like this.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 03:03 AM
7

The website was rebuked by members of the Harvard community who spoke to the Washington Free Beacon. “I find it heavily biased in favor of the women who are accusers,” Harvey Mansfield, a Harvard professor of government and expert on political philosophy, said in an email. “These accusers are labelled ‘survivors’ as if what they say of the incident must be presumed true; and those they accuse are the ones who ‘caused the harm’ rather than referred to as the accused.” Good, glad to see reasonable…
/r/MensRights16/06/16 09:12 PM
1

I still don't think pushing in favor of drafting women is the way to go, I'd rather abolish the draft.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 09:09 PM
5

No, but she's celebrating it. She tweeted "all BFs should be forced to read this"
/r/MensRights11/06/16 05:58 PM
1

All evidence is overwhelmingly in our favor, it's only a matter of time until things come to a head.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 05:45 PM
4

The line "if you break my heart, I'll break your face." and just google the authors twitter. it'll become obvious very quickly.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 04:35 PM
6

Well, when student union officers are lauded for posting "kill white men", what do you expect?
/r/MensRights11/06/16 04:26 PM
7

Feminists in power will be the END of the world, in actuality.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 03:45 PM
4

Ridiculous. If people don't put a stop this, in 20 years it'll just be the norm to for women to make more for the same job (which is NOT what's happening in reverse.)
/r/MensRights11/06/16 02:39 PM
1

What leak?
/r/MensRights11/06/16 03:43 AM
1

O I agree, that's exactly my point....have exactly the same thing and switch genders, and feminists would make a massive deal of it.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 08:23 PM
58

Well it's possible that the design is supposed to be a tongue-in-cheek way of being sympathetic to how father's day is neglected through humor.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 07:04 PM
7

We shouldn't tolerate this story being buried and forgotten about. We should make this a big deal, it's bullshit that these things are allowed to happen, and it won't change until someone steps up to challenge it.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 06:39 PM
13

We should MAKE it get as much attention as the Brock Turner case.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 06:36 PM
0

Actually you're right about Wiig, she was great in Walter Mitty. But not the others though.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 06:13 PM
5

The main is t he quality of actors. Amy Schmuer is like a freshman drama student at NYU who barely gets Cs.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 04:38 PM
1

Actually, in most Western countries young women actually earn MORE than their male counterparts. So while THE wage gap is a hoax, A wage gap is certainly real.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 04:19 PM
2

O I'm not saying it's a particular big deal, especially in the grand scheme of things. We all know we hardly need to look for things to be offended by. I guess my point is that the scene wasn't really offensive, it's that if the genders were reversed, it suddenly would be., and we'd have to hear about how the show is misogynsitic, encourages violence against women, etc. That's what slightly annoys me.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 04:11 PM
16

And the thing, rather than coming across as a serious political message, it's just going to be a farce that tries to be funny by insulting men the whole time. And I bet there are going to be several scenes of violence against men.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 04:06 PM
11

I do. I absolutely despise the fact that women are casted for these kinds of roles solely because they're women and that caters to a certain target group. Actually, you're right. It doesn't help women to do something like this, it just cheapens it. The quality of the movie will be low (which feminists will blame on misogyny), and it will only turn people off from "women movies." It's ridiculous.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 04:04 PM
7

They want the indoctrination to start young, train boys to associate maleness with badness.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 03:25 PM
25

People are waking up to this really quickly, just look at the comments. Plenty of men have experience with violent girlfriends or drunken women in public and are starting to get why "never hit a woman ever" is from an outdated era.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 02:29 PM
88

I've never seen anyone oppose this movie because the actors are female, it's just because the actors are bad and the script sounds stupid. If the ghostbusters were Jessica Chastain, Viola Davis, Angelina Jolie and Brie Larson, I'd be very excited about it. Instead you have these B list comedy losers. But hey, let them shoot themselves in the foot. They keep insulting half the population on a regular basis, I can't imagine that's going to improve what should already be a shitty showing at the box…
/r/MensRights10/06/16 02:25 PM
0

I'm not suggesting you're advocating anything, I'm just saying how I think things are. dumb college chicks. That mostly IS what radical SJW feminism is.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 06:29 AM
1

Can you link me that?? That's unbelievable
/r/MensRights10/06/16 05:08 AM
10

She'll probably get 3 weeks probation.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 04:57 AM
0

Who caused a great deal of damage before being beaten. Sure, after curfews for young men, higher tax rates for men, community service for female murderers and mandatory feminist courses starting from kindergarten and few million preventable prostate cancer deaths might finally provoke society to thrown feminism out, but personally, I'd rather not wait that long.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 04:06 AM
1

William Shatner is awesome.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 03:56 AM
1

SOOO many things explain the wage gap: male billionaires and male prisoners earning zero but who aren't counted offset the mean. men work manual labor jobs which earn more than minimum wage jobs job choice, such as stated in this article. in some countries, higher male pension ages, meaning men spend a higher percentage of their career in the older years which earn more than younger years than women do (because people usually earn more per year at age 62 than age 22, due to promotions.)
/r/MensRights10/06/16 03:21 AM
1

Sometimes, the madness of feminism can be most amusing.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 03:17 AM
2

Really grateful for your support! I honestly think this is a very good community to hang around. Others have suggested the honey badgers, they're really great, I would definitely recommend looking into them!
/r/MensRights10/06/16 03:16 AM
1

What these types of things are are really indoctrination seminars.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 03:12 AM
0

You might have also noticed this: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/4gsbm0/so_hillary_has_just_announced_that_women_will/
/r/MensRights10/06/16 03:09 AM
-1

Well, it's my honest opinion that the MRM is far too conservative in it's approach. Maybe I just think about this all too much, but I don't think we do enough. You'll see in my post history numerous calls for better organization and more direct action, because that is what we need. You'll regret being so passive sooner rather than later.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 02:59 AM
0

We'll win because we're right Said all the dead opponents of history's worst tyrants.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 02:48 AM
1

I promise it's not.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 02:48 AM
-2

We're better simply by virtue of the motivation for our actions. We're attacked by bad people, we should use any means necessary to defend ourselves. The biggest criticism I have of fellow MRAs is you all act as if this isn't a war. It IS, and make no mistake, your livelihoods are at stake. We AREN'T doing exactly the same thing, because we aren't going out of our way to hurt people for being born a certain way, nor do we hate people for being born a certain way. That's what makes us different, …
/r/MensRights10/06/16 02:35 AM
1

I'm doing it with serious intentions. So I don't think it's what's colloquially known as trolling, IMHO.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 02:20 AM
1

Well guys, that's not really "trolling"...I'm trying to expose feminists for what they are, this was an attempt- and successful one, IMO- at that very thing.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 02:10 AM
-1

I was fucking around, yes, but how do you know the other person was? And it wasnt really "fucking around", I was doing it with serious intent.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 01:52 AM
0

Yes, the "You".
/r/MensRights10/06/16 01:48 AM
0

I just had it, about 15 minutes ago.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 01:21 AM
1

I WANT to believe you, so how can you know for sure?
/r/MensRights10/06/16 01:06 AM
0

Sadly I don't think so.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 12:56 AM
1

On page 8, and already it's fantastic, puts it into words so well! Thank you
/r/MensRights10/06/16 12:39 AM
6

If men are at highest RISK, then it would appear that screening women is less important, and a waste of resources that could be going to men, the group at highest risk That sounds like the logic feminists use to keep homeless men out of public housing and to keep domestic violence against men quasi legal. I don't want to go down that road.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 11:51 PM
4

No it's great, I just think both men AND women should be screened, because, of course, as an MRA I believe in equality for all.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 11:28 PM
2

I know you think this is how MRAs really think. Let me just educate you, since I think you mean well, but are just very ignorant. Feminism is a hate group. They pose as a force for good, but in reality, the modern day SJW feminism branch is bigoted, hateful, and ignorant. MRAs are just good people who want high quality of life and equality for all. I often say we are the perfect model of what a successful society looks like (at least morally, MY ideal society is a transhumanistic society), and t…
/r/MensRights08/06/16 09:32 PM
3

This how we know feminism is both evil and extremely dangerous. It's really getting to a tipping point. The worst part is, by halting the advancement of science, feminists are hurting BILLIONS of people, including every woman on the planet. They really are insane. I just don't understand how this happened? How did such an awful movement become so powerful and attract so many members?
/r/MensRights07/06/16 03:09 AM
1

The deaths of innocent people is something that doesn't bother feminists.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 01:47 AM
1

O, I have no plans on ruining the movie. Actually, in the long run we'd actually HELP the movie.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 01:52 AM
6

This is the kind of thing that's going to start happening more and more at an accelerated rate.
/r/MensRights05/06/16 02:33 PM
3

That's why I'd love to go to Hollywood and become a known MRA actor. I'd light it up in interviews, god TMZ would go crazy and perez would hate me, lol.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 11:11 PM
19

The comments here are a little disappointing, we shouldn't be making snide or mocking remarks. But it says a lot about ingrained misandry that I A. Was expecting graffiti all over it B. Feel uncomfortable about this, despite knowing it's the very thing I support.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 06:00 PM
5

Well, from what I say it seems like most of the "general population" DOES see the stupidity of stuff like this. So I'll follow Sun Tzu and leave my enemy be to make mistakes.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 05:42 PM
1

Feminists like her support violence against men, it's no surprise.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 05:23 PM
4

Great piece, articles like this give me a sense of hope that maybe this new radical form of feminism doesn't pose too much of a threat, because it will inevitably destroy itself from within and people realize what it really is.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 05:20 PM
1

Thanks, just did
/r/MensRights02/06/16 08:43 AM
2

Interesting, I've been doing some googling and found some VERY curious threads and comment sections about it. It seems like what you suggested might have happened did indeed actually happen.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 04:37 AM
0

Not a MRA but " Then how would you know?
/r/MensRights30/05/16 04:36 AM
2

I definitely see it as something that's a force for good, and improvement.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 01:14 AM
1

That's exactly what this is for, that's what we should put together.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 01:04 AM
2

Here! We should start threads for certain cities and regions where people can PM and exchange contact info.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 01:04 AM
1

Haha we'll decide that when we get there, could be cool though!
/r/MensRights28/05/16 01:03 AM
2

I think the first thing to do is connect as many people a possible to the conversation, then organize by location.....get people to exchange emails with others in their area.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 01:02 AM
-1

Honestly, it's 50/50. I grew up democratic and "feel" like a liberal, but I support republicans to keep feminists out. I pro gay marriage and pro abortion though.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 04:05 AM
-5

Which is why Alexander's empire fell apart. We need to base support by political considerations to.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 03:16 AM
2

I've noticed that to. R/mensrights should be the moral, ethical, and intellectual triumph of social movements. That's the standard we need to work towards.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 03:06 AM
1

Interesting...but I have to say, my first reaction to that is "there are socialist feminists who are anti-SJW?"
/r/MensRights26/05/16 02:07 AM
15

It's what feminism is. Sexist, arrogant, entitled, selfish, hateful.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 02:03 AM
2

The nature of engrained passive misandry in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 05:49 PM
5

Good.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 04:54 PM
18

I'd be willing to bet that she identifies as a feminist.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 01:04 AM
6

Jeez, that's crazy. Classic feminist logic.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 03:19 AM
1

He thought Michigan st was going to beat bama last year, when they were in fact blown out 38-0 Other Holtz picks include: FSU to beat Oregon in the 2015 CFP game. (lost 59-20) Notre Dame to beat Alabama in the 2013 BCSCG (lost 42-12) duke to beat FSU in the 2013 ACCCG (lost 45-7) Clemson to beat FSU in 2013 (lost 51-14) Oregon to beat ohio st in the 2015 CFP championship (lost 42-20) He predicted tim tebow would win a superbowl within his first 3 years in Denver, he called Trent Richardson " a s…
/r/MensRights05/05/16 02:49 AM
1

Winning doesn't mean Trump wins, so much as it means the MRM get's more positive publicity. WE can still win even if Hillary wind the election....in fact, Hillary winning might even be better for us.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 08:05 PM
1

O I completely agree, and that's why I don't mean we back Trump, we just use all the noise that's going to happen.
/r/MensRights04/05/16 08:04 PM
3

It'll be a issue when women realize they can rob and assault men with practical impunity.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 01:51 PM
5

This is because single men can't qualify for public housing or benefits (thanks to feminist design.)
/r/MensRights28/04/16 01:42 PM
1

I thought about that. If this happens, there will be very little deterrence for women committing relatively minor first time offensive. Even a non-violent bank robbery is pretty much safe for a woman in this scenario. I expect the female crime rate to skyrocket, and the economy will take a major hit. Major civil rest may very will occur in the next 10 years, if not sooner.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 01:40 PM
5

If I had to guess, this platform is either going to be a push against mandatory arrest policies, or towards an even more biased domestic violence arrest model. I'm going to guess the latter.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 01:38 PM
118

This is why I'm saying we need a strong, street level reaction NOW , before it's too late. I'm constantly making signs that I print out and hang up. We should ALL be doing that.
/r/MensRights28/04/16 04:27 AM
2

Actually, I'm an actor, but I've been thinking about writing a book that's half autobiographical, and half about MRA/feminism.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 09:22 PM
1

It's supposed to be a working class neighborhood sometime around the first or second world war, and it's the neighborhood men having a "town meeting." They don't actually any real influence in the war, it's the modern day equivalent of a small town's city council. Also, the narrator is about 12ish, which affects her POV. But thanks!
/r/MensRights27/04/16 08:53 PM
2

Thank you! Shame the community at large doesn't seem to agree.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 08:51 PM
4

It's not, I just wrote it now.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 08:34 PM
4

I'd be willing to bet that the women doing the sexual harassment identify as feminists/SJWs.
/r/MensRights27/04/16 08:19 PM
2

Actually.....tbh I watched this one getting angry because I was anticipating the worse. But it really isn't that bad...the audience didn't seem to laugh all that hard, like they were a bit unsure. The loudest laughers were male.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 02:35 AM
1

Ok, any suggestions?
/r/MensRights21/04/16 12:32 AM
1

I wish I was in a position to agree, but morally, I cannot let myself neglect an opportunity to vote to prevent Hillary Clinton from becoming president. Half of that may just be self-preservation, but so be it.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 09:27 PM
0

I made an men's rights poster for Bernie Sanders/Anti-Clinton. I think MRAs should be very actively behind Bernie Sanders....not because I particularly like him, but if Clinton wins rad-fems and SJWs will be in power, and I see that as something that we MUST prevent. Here it is: http://imgur.com/VE6Y963 Any thoughts? It's just a rough draft.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 08:59 PM
0

It's relevant because those movements and all sjws are offshoots of and/or controlled by feminists. Pawns and recruiting pools. Their foot soldiers, if you will.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 05:38 AM
2

Most people, including women, are inherently anti-feminist and pro-MRA, simply by virtue of being decent people. Feminism is only the "mainstram ideology" because of trickery and smoke & mirror tactics. But most women have brothers, fathers, husbands, and sons. They don't hate men like feminists do.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 12:22 AM
0

This will be the norm in society in feminism and SJW culture saturates youth culture. Women's violence against men is a staple of feminism.
/r/MensRights20/04/16 12:18 AM
2

You NEVER see women, even young and healthy women, give up their seats for elderly or disabled men. Ever. Men are SO more much courteous and polite and public transportation, it's ridiculous. But these kinds of things are good, it will start showing the public just how crazy and delusional feminists really are. Feminists are getting so delusional and arrogant, they don't realize how they came across. They really do much of our work for us.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 11:59 PM
1

Been thinking about that, I completely agree.
/r/MensRights19/04/16 09:14 PM
2

Definitely.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 09:37 PM
2

The more I've been thinking about it, the more I agree, especially with the first part. Thanks!
/r/MensRights18/04/16 03:54 PM
3

I see them! Thank you :)
/r/MensRights18/04/16 01:23 PM
2

What makes me so angry about this is that these are the same women who likely use violence and abuse against their own husbands. Feminists have an entitled to violence against men that's quite scary.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 12:16 AM
3

This is great, mental health awareness for men is greatly lacking.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 12:11 AM
2

Thank you very much, I typed those up quickly so I missed the mistakes. Will definitely be more careful in the future!
/r/MensRights17/04/16 10:54 PM
2

O completely understand, we can never be too careful. It's a mad world we live in where we're the bad guys, but it seems that's how it is.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 10:33 PM
2

Thanks! This is great! I'll use it for sure.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 09:39 PM
1

I have, yes. I post fliers.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 09:26 PM
1

Which is exactly why we need to do something to make people talk about it. Imagine if w got 200 people in NYC to go out at midnight and put hundreds of fliers EVERYWHERE- subway cars, telephone poles, literally flooding Manhatten with them, so the next morning, people wake up and it's every where. People going to work see subway cars with windows peppered, then more on the sidewalk, etc. Come up with a logo or phrase or name that would be on every one, and then people see it one day in a Burger …
/r/MensRights17/04/16 09:26 PM
2

Ok, interesting. Where you having a medical issue such as phimosis corrected? Was our frenulum removed? How long ago was this? Sorry if the questions are a bit personal, I understand if you'd rather not answer.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 09:23 PM
3

here's an example of one i had saved. i printed a few different versions, i might go out tonight and see if there are any left. but if you guys really want, next time i go out, ill film myself posting them and put it on youtube! http://imgur.com/Hc1uj6J
/r/MensRights17/04/16 07:33 PM
2

This is getting worrying. We;re seriously getting close to the point of no return. We need to start fighting back before it's too late.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 06:33 PM
1

Well, we aren't doing enough.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 06:32 PM
2

I certainly understand, but if you follow my posting history I think you'll see I'm a good representative
/r/MensRights17/04/16 03:25 PM
6

Haha already am. Going around taping signs in bathrooms. Its Saturday night and it's very crowed, so I suspect people are seeing then!
/r/MensRights17/04/16 04:55 AM
2

Well, I don't want to waste time. I'm an MRA, and it seems like now is as good of a time as any to do something. I don't know who that user is, and I hardly see how suggesting we make fliers makes me an "agent provacateur." Yea, I want to provoke us into action, I'm sick of losing all the time.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 01:11 AM
1

NOW is disgusting. They also fought against alimony reform in Florida. Many elderly men are forced to go without healthcare because of permanent alimony. The proposed reform was simple a minor adjustment to fix extreme cases - such as the 73 man with Alzheimers being forced to go without care because his medicade and pension were going to his ex wife - and NOW opposed it. It's things like this that confirm the worst feminists truly are awful people.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 12:45 AM
0

I don't think we can ignore it though. I read that circumcision study, and feminists are actually using bogus research to change the scientific standard. It's going to get really bad when the SJW generation gets the age where they are the doctors and politicians. We need to do something, and now.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 12:20 AM
1

Thank you, reading now!
/r/MensRights16/04/16 08:38 PM
3

I must have missed it, I lurk every few days around the subreddit but I just made this account today and I didn't see a circumcision study recently, do you have the link by any chance? Thanks in advance!
/r/MensRights16/04/16 07:52 PM
3

That just seems absurd....how could someone POSSIBLY not know whether they were a rapist or not? For me, its obvious...I know it's something I would never, ever do because it's just a horrible thing to do and I would absolute detest it. How could anyone not know??
/r/MensRights16/04/16 07:40 PM
5

I think we should do things like print fliers and post them around campuses. Information on things like male victims of domestic violence, circumcision, conscription, men's health, etc. It doesn't cost much to print out so 25 pieces of paper and just hang them around common areas. It wouldn't be a bad idea to coordinate that type of thing, IMO.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 07:27 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter