TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Fortspucking Archive

View 20 posts and 852 comments by Fortspucking on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
2798

Edu./Occu.Fortspucking/r/MensRights15/11/17 12:59 PM
62

DiscriminationFortspucking/r/MensRights24/04/18 07:33 PM
54

DiscriminationFortspucking/r/MensRights31/01/18 01:54 AM
46

Social IssuesFortspucking/r/MensRights10/08/17 06:07 PM
45

FeminismFortspucking/r/MensRights19/12/17 07:55 AM
45

Social IssuesFortspucking/r/MensRights18/11/17 01:55 PM
29

Anti-MRMFortspucking/r/MensRights09/01/18 12:13 AM
26

Social IssuesFortspucking/r/MensRights21/12/17 06:41 AM
17

HumourFortspucking/r/MensRights08/02/18 01:18 AM
16

Marriage/ChildrenFortspucking/r/MensRights07/02/18 11:48 PM
15

Social IssuesFortspucking/r/MensRights18/12/17 08:19 AM
12

Social IssuesFortspucking/r/MensRights21/11/17 07:33 PM
11

Social IssuesFortspucking/r/MensRights11/08/17 02:55 PM
10

Edu./Occu.Fortspucking/r/MensRights22/01/18 12:04 AM
4

Edu./Occu.Fortspucking/r/MensRights04/08/17 02:56 PM
4

Social IssuesFortspucking/r/MensRights06/08/17 04:15 AM
3

Edu./Occu.Fortspucking/r/MensRights02/08/17 01:28 AM
2

Edu./Occu.Fortspucking/r/MensRights12/08/17 03:30 PM
1

Fortspucking/r/MensRights09/08/17 04:43 AM
0

Fortspucking/r/MensRights12/08/17 10:37 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Women make around 85% of the consumer buying decisions. Women are more susceptible to flattery. Women can be counted on not to walk away from shitty jobs if they have kids.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 11:44 AM
2

Feminism expressly had as a focus the weakening of men. Now they get to see how much damage weak men can do. They refused to honor men, now they have to deal with supremely dishonorable men.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 11:41 AM
1

Pretty white girl who gets it sucking up the attention. It's a cottage industry now. Fails to help men.
/r/MensRights19/12/25 11:30 PM
18

Oh yay, another pretty white girl absorbing attention by "getting it" about men's issues. It's a cottage industry on YouTube.
/r/MensRights22/10/25 10:11 PM
70

Women make around 85% of the consumer decisions. While not all women are swayed by pandering, the ones simple enough to be the targets of advertisers are.
/r/MensRights17/10/25 06:34 AM
19

Just another attractive white woman soaking up attention by telling us how she gets it. It's a cottage industry.
/r/MensRights05/10/25 11:25 PM
20

Women make around 85% of the consumer decisions. While not all women are swayed by pandering, the ones simple enough to be the targets of advertisers are.
/r/MensRights03/10/25 05:40 AM
14

I'm a big fan of Karen Straughan, but a lot of these are just reaction videos with unoriginal talking points.
/r/MensRights26/09/25 03:00 AM
65

Yet another attractive white woman telling us how she gets it and is going to bat for us. There's just a fucking squadron of them out there, soaking up the attention.
/r/MensRights25/09/25 09:56 PM
62

I'm suspicious of this squadron of young attractive white women pandering to men's issues. So well argued, so sassy. At the very least it feels like making bank off of suffering.
/r/MensRights22/09/25 05:01 AM
1

I'm sorry but this squadron of sassy white women pandering to wounded males for the bucks is just another female con.
/r/MensRights19/09/25 12:02 AM
3

This reminded me of a great National Lampoon book entitled "The Job of Sex." https://www.iliadbooks.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/thejobofsex-scaled.jpg I've always felt insulted by this "do me, and have a big tool" attitude. Just a grown up (or not) version of little princess.
/r/MensRights16/09/25 12:46 PM
17

Men use language to avoid fists. Women use language to injure, since they can't do as much damage with fists.
/r/MensRights04/09/25 07:42 AM
1

It's girls that hit the Disney stores and moms that hit the stores in the Disney parks. Boys are on Steam.
/r/MensRights24/08/25 09:16 PM
7

Women make something like 80%+ of all consumer spending decisions. The person most likely to veto spending decisions is the primary breadwinner. Who is the hardest to buy for in the family? Usually the dad. By portraying them as dumb, feckless, etc, they plant the notion that the male's opinion shouldn't matter.
/r/MensRights09/08/25 07:09 AM
3

Noting that throughout history, many of the wisest and most enlightened men have opted to live separately from women and in personal poverty. There is a lot of freedom in not being "husband material" and it will be hard to get men back in harness now they've gotten used to not being in it.
/r/MensRights07/09/19 05:45 AM
3

Modern feminism, a Shakepearean tragicomedy, entitled: "The Shaming of the True."
/r/MensRights07/09/19 05:41 AM
7

I've been thinking about this, the tendency for women to avoid being cast in any sort of unflattering light. I've been pondering how feminism is kind of a sociological Photoshop, always casting women in the best possible pose and lighting.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 10:53 AM
1

Just my opinion, but using their moment of triumph as an occasion to complain about pay is not very good PR.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 10:00 AM
1

The result is that women graduating from this program will be viewed as inferior to the males, due to favoritism.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 09:29 AM
1

With friends like Gillibrand, men do not need enemies. She says she wants to clorox the white house when she gets elected. I'm ok with her being elected cleaning lady if that's her focus.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 02:34 PM
1

Expense and repressiveness will sooner or later result in alternative, inexpensive and hugely disruptive educational models. Dropping one's life, going into debt, and taking unwanted courses in what is basically a medieval institution based on being near a pile of books....that is so indefensible in this age.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 02:21 PM
2

Yeah, that's exactly what Martin Luther had in mind when he did those church door post-its.
/r/MensRights11/08/19 01:42 PM
2

This is what critical thinking is for. CT101: False equivalency.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 10:35 PM
1

About a tenth of one percent of what masculinity produces, I imagine--even if this were true. I read recently that Teen Vogue isn't being read by teens any more since they went full on SJW.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 10:14 PM
3

If it was all male, they would complain about "authoritarian bias."
/r/MensRights23/05/19 10:05 PM
20

What are the odds that a male executive, having busted their ass through school and then advancement in the workplace, is going to be moved by shaming by some random feminist poseur? And how long will this shit fly in business, which, you know, is about making money, not about losing valuable executives through spurious accusations.
/r/MensRights23/05/19 12:33 AM
1

In the immortal words of the bug from MIB: "Your proposal is, uhh, acceptable!"
/r/MensRights23/05/19 12:30 AM
1

The black part trumped the woman part this time.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 08:49 PM
1

I agree, and I thought she was a more canny politician than to do this.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 08:46 PM
3

Yeah, she's so clearly wrong I didn't feel I had to address that ;-)
/r/MensRights22/05/19 09:37 AM
12

I'm tempted to think she is just cynically pandering to get women's vote, but people made that mistake with Trump as well. I find things to admire about Ms. Harris, but I will never vote a feminist into power.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 09:21 AM
5

The nuclear family is a feature of 20th century capitalism, which invaded and broke apart the true family structure, which is extended and has roots in a location. The nuclear family is by nature unstable, since there simply isn't the kind of support families need. Nuclear families were more convenient for shifting people around to where business needed them, uprooting them from their history and connection to place. Now Capitalism has invaded and broken apart even the nuclear family into a coll…
/r/MensRights22/05/19 09:18 AM
16

Duh, the whole fucking thing was created by a man. No worries, ladies, there's the Handmaid's Tale for you.
/r/MensRights22/05/19 12:33 AM
1

This is straight up saying that men's discomfort is invalid, wrong. What makes women uncomfortable is central, even if it's just an imagined situation; what makes men uncomfortable--even when there is real risk--should be discounted. Clear case of sexism.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 10:55 AM
1

I thought the MRM was supposed to be a bit better than common troll crap. You're no help at all.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 06:13 AM
1

Go ahead and make memes, just don't rep them as the original work of the artist.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 05:55 AM
-5

Sez me. I follow the comic and this is a fake. Also, you can take it up with Jeph Jacques when he gets around to you. Since I just tweeted the post to the creator of the comic.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 04:40 AM
-7

This is not a real version of that comic. This should be made plain.
/r/MensRights20/05/19 04:30 AM
2

"Welcome to astonishment when you find out your circlejerk opinions are not effective in the real world."
/r/MensRights19/05/19 03:37 AM
1

He's wealthy enough that he could spank 'em in court, ala Gawker.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 03:36 AM
1

If I woke up at age 20 tomorrow, I'd book one asap.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 03:20 AM
5

I've only watched the older Handmaid's Tale movie, but from what I gather, the story, if inverted, works well as a projection of the feminist agenda for men.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 07:13 PM
29

When feminists are going on about how mistreated and innocent women are, I think: Do they not understand that we all know a lot of women, and that some of these women we know are assholes, villains, liars and thieves? Such a con game.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 07:10 PM
504

Not a word about how an unfounded accusation can cost a career and reputation that took a lifetime to build. Instead of demanding of men, where's the discussion of what women actually have to offer?
/r/MensRights18/05/19 11:36 AM
1

That's a common stand of the pro-life people. Feminists are at core all about having two sets of rules.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 04:16 AM
1

That's a common stand of the pro-life people. Feminists are at core all about having two sets of rules.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 04:16 AM
9

A male teaching self-responsibility and rejection of victimhood is of course a target for SJWs.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 12:42 AM
1

Karen Straughan does a brilliant job, as always, on the historical origins of male disposability and the difficulty women have in caring about the lives of powerless men. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vp8tToFv-bA&t=4s
/r/MensRights17/05/19 03:31 PM
34

Most people who are pro-life are women. . What to do with them?
/r/MensRights17/05/19 07:40 AM
7

So somehow being pro-life is a white supremicist stand now? Actual demographics have 50% of all whites as pro-life but also 44% of all non-whites are pro-life. https://news.gallup.com/poll/244709/pro-choice-pro-life-2018-demographic-tables.aspx
/r/MensRights16/05/19 05:01 PM
1

Only recently have women had any meaningful amounts of power in Western business and government. Therefore, the ways in which they abuse power are not as generally present to public awareness as those of men, which are well documented. Generations of women who had proscribed and sacrificial lives were accorded a lot of sentimental slack in recognition of this. Modern women are still trading on that sentiment, but they are burning through it like a sailor on leave. The social and monetary cost of…
/r/MensRights15/05/19 03:37 AM
3

So far in discussions of Milano's stand, I have seen zero mentions of the fact that more than half of the people who are anti-abortion are women.
/r/MensRights15/05/19 02:59 AM
1

"....you got me on my knees..."
/r/MensRights14/05/19 01:46 PM
1

That is extremely high praise indeed. I have cleared my calendar for some blush time.
/r/MensRights14/05/19 06:28 AM
3

I believe that women who make statements like this have a deeply held belief, maybe from generations before her, that her words have no weight or consequences.
/r/MensRights13/05/19 10:21 PM
3

I think you got some straw in your hair after that rant.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 11:57 PM
378

It has come to feminists' notice that groups of enthusiastic men with an idea will bust their ass to make it happen and frequently end up with hugely successful enterprises where there was nothing before. They feel this must be stopped, due to being insufficiently flattering towards women.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 11:47 PM
5

Ignoring the fact that a sizeable portion of citizens against abortions are women... From Wikipedia, U.S. stats: "More recently, sociologist Ziad Munson studied the characteristics of both activists and non-activists who considered themselves anti-abortion. The anti-abortion activists of Munson's sample were 93% white, 57% female, 66% Catholic, and 71% had a college degree. Of non-activists who considered themselves anti-abortion, Munson found that 83% were white, 52% were female, 45% were Catho…
/r/MensRights12/05/19 07:31 AM
1

As if no women are opposed to abortion. Misandry and politics doesn't work.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 07:18 AM
11

Gradually, as it continues to disappear, women may come to understand how much of the comfort, safety, convenience and wealth in their lives comes from the inherent goodness, decency, productiveness and generosity of men. They're already at peak whore to get men's attentions, often. What will they do to get the goodwill of men back?
/r/MensRights12/05/19 07:16 AM
163

This...and the recent call from Alyssa Milano to strike against men by withholding sex....you would think there were never any women in all those anti-abortion protests or among the constituents of the leaders proposing these laws.
/r/MensRights12/05/19 06:59 AM
6

Thats factual. Feminists consider an attack on them as an attack on all women, and anything said unflattering about any woman as an attack on feminism. Has nothing to do with the actual purpose of the various men's organizations/philosophies.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 01:27 PM
5

It's best to ignore feminists on this issue. MGTOW, MensRights,Incels,JordanPeterson,RedPill, and so on...the ONLY common thread is that they offer perspectives that are unflattering to women.
/r/MensRights08/01/19 01:17 PM
1

Men are great at inventing disruptive strategies when we don't get what we need. Colleges are a remnant of Medieval culture; in a digital age, clumping together around libraries and dropping one's life and going into hock when the information and expertise is available cheaply is stupid. I'm pretty sure new methods of organized pedagogy that are local and more individualized are going to crystallize--and be invented by men, just like those other wildly successful disruptive creations, like the t…
/r/MensRights07/01/19 08:04 AM
1

This sounds like a good cover story for why she has no straight male friends.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 02:56 PM
0

Sexual assault aside, Weinstein getting himself attached to over 225 movies must have left quite a number of people feeling fucked over and abused. The guy is a brute, but a lot of people were happy to have the brute in their corner as well. It's easy to imagine him raping women and them still kissing his ass to keep their careers going. But if this acquittal takes the witch-hunt atmosphere down a few notches, that's not a bad thing.
/r/MensRights05/08/18 02:38 PM
4

This article is aimed at female readers, and therefore takes pains to present the issue in the most flattering and sympathetic light possible, right up to the edge of fiction. I had a male housemate who was a high functioning borderline...only person I could imagine killing. They're really hard to treat and create emotional chaos for anyone close to them, making everyone around them feel guilty and question their reality.
/r/PussyPassDenied29/07/18 10:55 AM
1

A lot of atrocities have been excused as being for "preservation of peace."
/r/MensRights18/07/18 10:38 AM
8

This is a gambit to immediately put the focus back on women, in line with the gynocentric focus of feminism.
/r/MensRights10/07/18 04:04 AM
5

I'm always bemused by feminists locating all the source of abuse at the male half of the gender. Ignoring that we all have women in our lives who are abusive, who are liars, who are just plain assholes.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 06:44 AM
6

We also need to teach women not to avoid unflattering information like a vampire avoiding sunlight.
/r/MensRights26/06/18 06:40 AM
10

This. Women have had increased power in the world only a few decades, and it's going to take a while before there is general recognition of the ways women can abuse power without knowing it. The challenges that face women are still real, and women didn't unilaterally invent the idea of male disposability. We're all learning and healing together.
/r/MensRights16/06/18 05:14 PM
1

Just a stupid idea. Glad she did it for what it illustrates.
/r/PussyPassDenied12/06/18 02:20 AM
1

"The Future is Female" "Slut-Shaming" "Rape Culture" "Toxic Masculinity." Feminism is buoyed up by buzz-phrases that never reach the ground in terms of real-world phenomena.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 04:51 PM
2

I can see businesses lining up to endorse a large drop in productivity. Mhm.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 04:48 PM
2

Building from an argument that male proceptivity is a socialized phenomenon invalidates every other part of the argument. Would that feminists could be treated to the sex drive of a healthy young male for a few weeks.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 04:45 PM
1

I'm guessing that a higher percentage of men than women are more oriented towards earning and investing than spending. Who is the hardest person in the family to buy for?
/r/MensRights12/05/18 04:14 PM
4

It's not slavery if you're passionate about what you're doing and feel called to that as your life's purpose. For them, everything else is secondary and they want to do it as long as they can. If it's just a job, it doesn't feed a person spiritually in the same way and needs to be balanced with other aspects of life for health and happiness.
/r/MensRights09/05/18 09:03 AM
3

No.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 08:38 AM
30

They cost as much to train, and take up a spot that could have been taken by a male who would have worked long hours for decades.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 05:37 AM
9

This woman coldly let a man sit in jail for a quarter of a century. I'm guessing she had a story she told herself and believed enough to take her mind off it.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 05:33 AM
2

The list of men who were strong supporters of feminism who have been tossed out grows longer. There doesn't seem to be any awareness that the loss of these men will cost women, and discourage other men from carrying their feminist banner in future. Women cannot expect to be given positions of power and leadership if they cannot moderate and find ways to work with useful people in spite of their errors.
/r/MensRights08/05/18 05:30 AM
3

A similar calculus is in play for black neighborhoods that are dangerous. Businesses don't set up shop there. What is unfair is that health insurance is the same for males and females, though females cost the companies considerably more, so that males subsidize them.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 02:56 PM
1

Um, they have actual stats going back decades about the driving habits of males vs females. Males drive more recklessly until they're around 25 when the rates go down. It's not prejudice when there's hard evidence.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 02:47 PM
4

Who is the hardest person in the family to buy for? Old dad. Cuz he makes the money and in previous times he had the final say on expenditures. So ads undermine his power in the family to his wife and children so they don't listen to him and his foolish goals for investing for the long term, but instead load up at the mall, where most of the shops are for women and children.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 09:26 AM
13

I'm more of an observer than a progressive activist, but I'm an old guy and watched the dynamism of the 1960's social progress go down the shitter when feminists withdrew support from anything that didn't concern their personal rights.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 09:20 AM
2

Males take more risks. They have more accidents. It's math, in this case, not prejudice. Of course there are crazy women drivers and really great male ones, so the unfairness is applying the math to the whole gender. But, it's their business and that's how they run it.
/r/MensRights05/05/18 09:17 AM
3

Well, for young men, there are street gangs. Then prison.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 09:45 PM
7

I would guess that he didn't want the appearance of having only male TA's, which would have left him open for PC police investigation.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 07:14 PM
13

Places like the Boy Scouts, the YMCA (now full of pregnant mothers doing yoga) and the Boys Clubs of America (Now Boys and Girls Clubs) were originally created as wholesome places for young boys to form into honorable and skilled men. The loss of those spaces means that boys will seek bonding and initiation in less savory ways if at all. It may turn out that the most effective and well developed men will be criminals.
/r/MensRights02/05/18 07:11 PM
4

Seems to be no limit on the backgrounding of boys in these times. Well young fellas, there's always gangs, right?
/r/MensRights02/05/18 04:08 PM
1

"Iron John" Robert Bly "King, Warrior, Magician, Lover," Robert Moore "Fire in the Belly" Sam Keen
/r/MensRights01/05/18 10:11 AM
3

I have compassion for their situation, but no respect for their response to it. The only sane and empowered way to live is to take responsibility for your life, no matter what cards you're dealt. If you can't get laid, then save up your money and get a hooker, or beat off and reflect on the financial advantages of celibacy. That said, I think the special hatred feminists have for incels is that their self-pity and victimhood reminds them of their own.
/r/MensRights01/05/18 10:00 AM
2

He makes a good point, but I could see ol' Cagney learning on the job quickly. :-)
/r/MensRights01/05/18 09:56 AM
3

Here is a powerful video on the subject by the estimable Karen Straughan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vp8tToFv-bA
/r/MensRights27/04/18 12:46 PM
4

It causes genuine alarm in women to think that they can't automatically hurl men at danger. It's a deep fear from thousands of years of this needing to be the case.
/r/MensRights27/04/18 04:04 AM
2

Very nice people can have pretty creepy fantasies; sweet housewives write some eye-watering erotica on adult sites. I don't think Cosby could have made so many people love him if there wasn't that genuine goodness to him. He fucked up believing that his celebrity gave him permission to act out his kinks on real people with real damaging consequences. Carl Jung coined the term "inflation" where a person feels like they have godlike powers. You see it all the time, but mostly the damage is done to…
/r/MensRights27/04/18 04:02 AM
5

I sometimes wish that, a while after puberty, women could be given a treatment that allowed them to experience the sex drive of a healthy young male for a few days. They might understand that men are controlling their sexual urges 24/7, and that it is disrespectful to not take that into consideration.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 05:38 PM
23

She's young and she's been taught that she's lovable no matter what she does, with the shadow part of that being that her words and actions don't count for much in the world.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 05:35 PM
1

Krusty, the conniving Jew, Burns the sociopathic billionaire, his closeted assistant, the fighty Scots groundskeeper, the mama's boy principal, the fat neckbeard comic guy...everyone comes off poorly. Called satire.
/r/MensRights26/04/18 05:32 PM
1

I'm a low income retiree, and use the local community dental clinic. One hundred percent staffed by women.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 08:59 AM
1

My MA entailed study of depth psychology, esp. Jung. I'm guessing he would point to the myth of Artemis, the warrior virgin in her woods, who, upon feeling intruded upon by a hunter that wandered in, turned him into a beast so his fellows would kill him. I'm guessing if a woman is feeling kind of bad about herself, maybe from an excess of fucking around, then hooking into a virgin mythology by accusing and putting all the negative sexuality onto men would be mighty attractive. I see Artemis girl…
/r/MensRights25/04/18 08:56 AM
1

Being creeped out is an internal process, no necessarily an accurate response to external events. A lot of women get a perverse pleasure out of feeling menaced. I remember my stepfather taking out his teeth and chasing my little female cousins around growling, and them squealing and giggling in mock terror. And then I think of guys on death row, heinous motherfuckers, genuine creeps, with big ol fanclubs of women. Not to deny that there are creeps and that feelings can be accurate, but not a har…
/r/MensRights25/04/18 08:49 AM
1

One factor that seems to be backgrounded is that the West went from a producing economy to a finance and consumer economy. Women do 80% of the consumer spending, and pandering to them showed up in TV and movies while husbands--previously the deciding vote on spending--were pictured as dopey ineffectual children who could be ignored.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 08:44 AM
1

Ah, yes, Trump's ladies are such good examples of this.
/r/MensRights25/04/18 08:28 AM
21

If these spaces are challenged in court and there is a precedent set, it cannot be for just the one gender.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 08:04 PM
29

This, of course, leaves open the legal possibility of men's only workspaces as well.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 07:34 PM
1

I see that and I want to post a composite picture of all of Trump's bevy of lady assholes with the caption: "Like These?"
/r/MensRights21/04/18 04:40 PM
1

So, the future is female, is it? All will be solved when women run things? Just a few problems with that assertion.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 02:00 AM
2

I don't imagine white males are collecting in heaps around the door trying to get into this collection of goofy, maudlin, gossip-mongering tripe.
/r/MensRights16/03/18 01:58 AM
12

I think when guys have been holding in their feelings and finally get a place to vent, it comes out rough and ugly. And later on, if they're wiser, their thinking becomes fairer.
/r/MensRights08/03/18 05:32 PM
1

OMG, remember what effect the Parental Advisory Panel had on limiting mature lyrics in music! Um, not much. SPLC can be ignored....the only people that will pay it creedence are already inside the feminist echo chamber.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 03:54 PM
3

Paglia's Venn radius overlaps with feminism, but it's huge, and shares space with many other disciplines, interests, and skills--notably among them, critical thinking.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 03:17 PM
3

Rigorously challenge their rationale for existing in the first place.
/r/MensRights28/02/18 02:45 AM
1

The problematic word is "blame," which is almost always an unhelpful concept. People take issue with feminists refusing to allow rape victims to be seen as implicated in what happened through unwise actions and choices. Critics of feminists say that this disempowers women by saying that nothing they do can have an effect on what happens to them.
/r/MGTOW223/02/18 05:52 PM
1

Oh, you're a lazy thinker....
/r/MensRights11/02/18 11:09 PM
5

Fine then, lady. Have it yourself.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 09:21 PM
2

https://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss_2?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=stevia+water+sweetener
/r/MGTOW11/02/18 08:56 PM
1

You can't have mercy if you have no power to harm, it's true.
/r/MGTOW11/02/18 08:47 PM
3

I said living. And comparing Trump to Lincoln is fucking disgusting. And to deny that Trump lies when the proof is anywhere you care to look represents denial as the least suspect of your motives.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 08:46 PM
1

Seventy-one.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 08:26 PM
1

The death toll is mounting.
/r/MGTOW11/02/18 08:12 PM
6

It's actually coming from a position of power, traditionally. The man is acknowledged to be the more powerful of the two, but he bends to support her, to offer to be the strength she can build a home and family on. You know, historical meaning. Now, not so much.
/r/MGTOW11/02/18 08:09 PM
1

When the President is the most widely reviled and lampooned human currently living? I'd say that's a big fat yes.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 08:01 PM
2

Hard to see this coming to reality, given that neither men nor women prefer women leaders, and women are not known for supporting other women in inferior positions.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 07:49 PM
7

Well, he does lie even when the truth would be better. Having him spout male empowerment slogans does men no favors.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 07:46 PM
7

As women are discovering and trying to figure out how to use yang wisely (and currently failing out loud) it is an opportunity for men to discover and utilize the immense power of yin and to watch how the Tao addresses all strife and chaos and brings eventual harmony.
/r/MGTOW11/02/18 07:45 PM
3

Psychology Today investigation into women wearing make-up: Four out of five major points were about impressing men. https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/meet-catch-and-keep/201502/5-research-backed-reasons-we-wear-makeup Buzzfeed quiz of women why they wear makeup: Zero admitted it had anything to do with attracting men. That level of dishonesty is pervasive. https://www.buzzfeed.com/augustafalletta/stop-saying-women-wear-makeup-to-get-dudes?utm_term=.ooq0l5yKX#.esoLWx08Q
/r/MGTOW11/02/18 07:37 PM
4

Women don't objectify men, though, heh. There is not much else more de-individuating than a uniform.
/r/MGTOW11/02/18 07:15 PM
2

The most powerful woman I've ever known personally always drove home the point that if you don't acknowledge your support, you will eventually be in trouble and fail.
/r/MGTOW11/02/18 06:47 PM
18

Well, the truth doesn't care who says it.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 06:42 PM
27

Women, as they gain more power, need to learn to separate justice from vendetta, which is a mid-sized Buick model, I believe.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 06:40 PM
1

thanks for the tip. I've been on and off as a subscriber to MGTOW because of the spite, but illogical raw anger venting is also part of the process sometimes, if it can be moderated so that it doesn't become the general character of the sub.
/r/MGTOW11/02/18 06:34 PM
1

If you don't feel like doing anything, meditation is the most useful way to do that. Everything in life will go away in the end, so it's all what we make of it or don't. But, you know, the universe is pretty damned playful if you get in tune with it.
/r/MGTOW11/02/18 07:28 AM
0

Well, insult then. This sub gets enough shit for being anti-women, and I'd like to keep it in business.
/r/MGTOW11/02/18 03:40 AM
1

Functional patriarchy is no longer a factor, and mostly Western society is allied against the worst of it. What exists is a lot of extra support for men in the areas of political and business power, partly through tradition and partly because it's useful, since they do the lion's share of accomplishments.
/r/MensRights11/02/18 03:39 AM
0

Your posts seem pretty trollish, to me. MGTOW isn't about hating women, it's about personal freedom in a time of chaos when women's natural inclinations are not suited to the amount of power they have been given.
/r/MGTOW11/02/18 01:32 AM
77

Both are just roles she's playing to garner attention. Blank slate. Look at the eyes.
/r/MGTOW10/02/18 05:00 PM
1

Thanks I learned that from a really powerful woman.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 02:42 PM
1

Getting to a high level of competency in a video game requires a lot of work, thought, strategy, and perseverence. Very transferrable skills. And high level raiding takes a high level of interpersonal cooperation and communication. A top level game provides the player with an environment that is the product of much planning, creativity, and learning. Not the same as vegging to Netflix at all.
/r/MGTOW10/02/18 02:15 AM
1

Actually, men playing video games has spawned an international sports business and, as we have fewer jobs in the real world, they may be showing us how to have rewarding and enjoyable lives online with each other with real world results. Men make shit, and usually everything new they make is over the objection of women and unimaginative people. Thirty years ago it was guys playing with their transistors and wires and ham radios, and now, trillions of dollars of wealth created, and the former sco…
/r/MGTOW10/02/18 12:16 AM
14

Because you dissemble constantly doesn't make you complex, it just obfuscates the basic bitch you actually are.
/r/MGTOW10/02/18 12:08 AM
4

Girls don't mature faster. There are plenty of adult feminists who basically have a pre-adolescent emotional attitude toward males. What girls do is stop being playful and impulsive and become more obedient and docile. That's submissive, not mature.
/r/MensRights10/02/18 12:05 AM
14

Feminism is always looking for new areas to set up shop.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 08:53 PM
16

Women say shit like that because they don't think they count. Women who value themselves value their words.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 08:53 PM
11

A certain percentage of men have always been outside the main game. What's new is how much dysfunction is happening between the sexes, necessitating social support for the greater numbers of men who find themselves needing to choose this lifestyle for personal preservation, even if it's not a perfect fit for their nature.
/r/MGTOW09/02/18 08:50 PM
78

Interestingly, the male accuser is not anonymous.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 12:25 PM
59

Children are really expensive in the U.S. in our gangster economy and our protection racket medical system. All the alarm seems to be that economic growth will slow, the sole concern of the people at the top, the people who started the warfare against men, using feminists as useful idiots.
/r/MGTOW09/02/18 12:24 PM
31

Way to go!
/r/MGTOW09/02/18 05:35 AM
45

Having the other gender take your jobs. Wow, wonder how that feels?
/r/MGTOW09/02/18 04:20 AM
6

Home-built ones are still very crude. Much room for improvement. https://vignette.wikia.nocookie.net/southpark/images/a/a8/FatButtandPancakeHead06.jpg/revision/latest?cb=20100418055907
/r/MGTOW09/02/18 04:17 AM
11

The complaint will be against the male ideal of competition.
/r/MGTOW09/02/18 04:15 AM
15

He expresses care and affection for the well-being of young men. It's in rare supply these days.
/r/MensRights09/02/18 03:45 AM
3

If the police aren't handling it, it's not worth my concern.
/r/MGTOW09/02/18 03:02 AM
13

Shallow Hal without the male.
/r/MGTOW09/02/18 02:53 AM
2

Light jacket https://i.ytimg.com/vi/IdzhjBLjHsk/maxresdefault.jpg
/r/MGTOW08/02/18 10:28 PM
3

Yeah, the remake is a lot better than the original made for TV one.
/r/MGTOW08/02/18 10:26 PM
5

I love this description of wise men in the Tao Te Ching...for me it describes a lot about being MGTOW: "The ancient masters were subtle, mysterious, profound, responsive. The depth of their knowledge is unfathomable. Because it is unfathomable, All we can do is describe their appearance. Watchful, like men crossing a winter stream. Alert, like men aware of danger. Courteous, like visiting guests. Yielding like ice about to melt. Simple, like uncarved blocks of wood. Hollow, like caves. Opaque, l…
/r/MGTOW08/02/18 09:57 PM
3

We have a couple billionaires having a great time and working their asses off, not the grim miserable types who usually sit on their stocks and fuck others over. For some, who have a good idea what they want to do with money, putting in the effort pays off. For me, with no particular drive to accomplish much, unhooking from the social expectation of how to live seemed a very useful savings of energy.
/r/MGTOW08/02/18 09:51 PM
5

Lifelong lazy man. Getting rich usually requires work, but MGTOW makes getting along ok much easier. Bonus is that if you're just getting by, you're not a target for scams, male or female.
/r/MGTOW08/02/18 07:45 PM
11

Being ok with solitude is like having a goldmine in your backyard; it saves endless problems and griefs. And I think personal economics classes should start with a chapter called "This is your hand. Use it and you will save so much money."
/r/MGTOW08/02/18 07:36 PM
8

They see it as a zero sum game; anything that takes the focus off women and girls is to be attacked.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 07:18 PM
1

There is a strong combination of instinct to carry on the species and the mythology of marriage and family which permeates the culture, even as the reality is now different on the ground. Were we in a time of less upheaval, and men and women were actually socialized according to their true natures, marriage and family would be desirable.
/r/MGTOW08/02/18 07:01 PM
9

It's asinine to think that warrior mentality and gentlemanly mentality can coexist. There's a reason for camp followers, prostitution in military towns and raping of captured populations. Shakespeare did a less crude description in "Much Ado About Nothing:" "O, my lord, When you went onward on this ended action, I look'd upon her with a soldier's eye, That liked, but had a rougher task in hand Than to drive liking to the name of love: But now I am return'd and that war-thoughts Have left their p…
/r/MGTOW08/02/18 06:57 PM
7

Thank you for the good link. I appreciate the interpretation. Some people seem to manage complex and materialistic lives in a light and happy way; I've never been one of those. So many problems just never arise when life is uncluttered.
/r/MGTOW08/02/18 04:37 PM
4

http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/when-we-instantly-believe-women-we-invite-them-to-lie/20874#.Wnx6WqinFqM
/r/MensRights08/02/18 04:28 PM
11

A little late...I'm 71, retired psych professor. Here's a salient podcast, if you're interested. http://www.spiked-online.com/newsite/article/when-we-instantly-believe-women-we-invite-them-to-lie/20874#.Wnx6WqinFqM
/r/MensRights08/02/18 04:27 PM
1

The "O" in MGTOW...means you define it your own self. It's an inside job, first and foremost.
/r/MGTOW08/02/18 10:26 AM
85

Ideally it's not a fight, just an unhooking, no drama, no big deal. I love the Tao Te Ching as an example of how to behave. Going one's own way is so easy that others will be upset and say you're cheating. Keeping a low profile with nothing to prove is a path with so much freedom. https://terebess.hu/english/tao/gia.html (I especially love Chapter 20.)
/r/MGTOW08/02/18 10:21 AM
7

I always thought that Titanic was a bit of a snuff movie; young woman basically lives the life that the male was supposed to live. This maybe explains why it was so popular with girls.
/r/MGTOW08/02/18 10:02 AM
75

Open invitation for women to lie with impunity and be believed. Whatever trust is left between men and women would evaporate faster than moth piss off a lightbulb.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 09:56 AM
16

You're not supposed to notice they're overweight. All princesses.
/r/MGTOW08/02/18 06:44 AM
3

Well, that's why we should listen to people, to assess for ourselves what is good stuff and what is bs that we can use to fertilize the good stuff :-)
/r/MensRights08/02/18 04:50 AM
3

https://www.instagram.com/p/Be5yOWKAumo/?taken-by=itspeteski
/r/PussyPassDenied08/02/18 04:38 AM
15

The whole #MentorHer thread in Twitter just completely ignores any possible threat to men in the situation or any actions that might mitigate it. Again, disposable men, and if accused, they deserve it. Feminists deserve a mighty backlash if only to wake them up to their unconscious disdain for men.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/02/18 03:58 AM
9

Wouldn't mentoring women involve an unacceptable amount of mansplaining? And if the amount is too high, does it count as assault?
/r/MensRights08/02/18 03:32 AM
5

Net loss for some chunky girls, who will remain unporked.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 03:23 AM
24

Speech isn't dangerous. His worthwhile ideas can be useful and his bad ones can be inspected and discarded. This just feeds the liberal no-platform hysteria.
/r/MensRights08/02/18 01:21 AM
8

The gender formerly known as pronounceable.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 11:50 PM
11

Apparently, nothing a woman could do would bring adverse publicity.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 11:36 PM
33

He was trying to be PC but there is no PC way for a man to correct a woman, of course.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 09:38 PM
2

Soon that will be easily done, and in this case, necessary.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 08:37 PM
1

Hmm, maybe if enough stuff becomes taboo, new perversions will arise and people will leave kids alone...
/r/MensRights07/02/18 08:36 PM
25

The Bohemian Club is an all male exclusive club that has met for nearly 150 years. People have complained endlessly and protested, ect. but it's legal, and so is this Finnish one. In the case of the Bohemian Club, it has been a couple thousand elite men getting together out of the spotlight to just be silly asses. I'm guessing it will be the same with the women's retreat. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bohemian_Club
/r/MensRights07/02/18 06:55 PM
3

He's gonna have sooo much ramen!
/r/MensRights07/02/18 06:46 PM
0

Forewarned is forearmed.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 06:15 AM
2

If you throw a bucket of piss up in the air and it lands on you, that's not a backlash, that's gravity.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 06:13 AM
0

It was pointed out elsewhere that the "keep it in your pants" argument is basically the pro-life argument when directed at women.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 05:59 AM
39

It will be interesting to see the legal fallout when men are ordered to mentor or work alone with women now they've been handed a hugely dangerous legal weapon, requiring those men to deal daily with the possibility that they could be escorted off the premises before end of day if the woman decides she doesn't like him. I can see this going to court.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 05:26 AM
18

This is a decision for the penis wearer, to be made when they are of age to decide for themselves.
/r/MensRights07/02/18 12:56 AM
6

Combination of the prospect of some pricey defamation payouts plus most of the accusations not resulting in prosecutions. Kind of like the dog finally caught the mail truck.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 03:03 PM
5

Male privilege is simply the support a society gives to those who get the majority of shit done.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 02:37 PM
7

Women have the power they have because they have been useful idiots, driving consumer economics and splitting labor against itself. As women start causing serious economic risks, they'll be suppressed as easily as they were empowered, through a new sentimentality of domesticity.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 01:45 AM
26

Episodes like this will hopefully erode the sentimentality that causes institutions to take the woman's part, once it becomes associated with large financial losses.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 01:14 AM
54

This is the kind of stuff that got us Trump for a president. She was campaigning to be president of women of the world, and kids, and some gays.
/r/MensRights06/02/18 12:54 AM
1

Ahem...cockroaches.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 03:07 PM
6

Really smart women saying really dumb shit. Men and women, being mammals, are not equal sexually and never will be; men enjoy looking at women, women enjoy the company of men who can provide resources. Built in. Not an accident.
/r/MensRights04/02/18 05:03 AM
5

The pussy hats were pretty much knitted by the people that wore them, but women are the primary targets of advertising and PR, since they do the majority of retail purchasing. This explains why men are downgraded in advertising, since they are often the ones least swayed by it.
/r/MensRights03/02/18 09:04 PM
5

They should learn from the Church that repression only ends up creating a whole new set of entertaining perversions.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 06:55 PM
36

I'm imagining techno monasteries in the future, where men can live well together enjoying shared resources and freedom from drama.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 12:08 PM
4

Of course there are dumb weak women. There are dumb weak men. "Woman" is not a noun that includes the meanings strong and smart.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 03:46 AM
9

All those headlines, and no mention that the suspect is a girl.
/r/MensRights02/02/18 03:44 AM
1

I'm an American. What else is new?
/r/MensRights02/02/18 01:06 AM
2

Trump is not my friend. Feminism is not my friend. Trump not supporting feminism does not m him my friend. Sorry about your imagination.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 07:43 PM
5

Also implies that women know how to raise good men, which is refuted by the stats on sons of single mothers.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 07:37 PM
2

Wasps don't start forest fires. That doesn't make them my friends.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 07:35 PM
1

If you think of all the men who back up these women as musicians, designers, roadies etc etc etc, and then think of Ed with his ass hanging out behind a little guitar and repeater...more white men lost than won!
/r/MensRights01/02/18 07:29 PM
0

Only probably fucking up, staying with the conclusion you're jumping to.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 10:03 AM
3

It certainly doesn't, on the face of it, suggest any bias towards women. Perhaps other means are necessary to ascertain whether this actually exists in the real world or just in the feelings of the women employees. It's not up to the BBC to prove bias.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 07:56 PM
3

Being attractive is fine if it's for other women, but having appreciative males nearby is unacceptable to them. It's interesting how many of the projects of feminism end up affecting attractive women even more than men.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 07:02 PM
99

They see no cognitive dissonance in it, probably because cognition didn't come into it very strongly.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 12:57 PM
28

Any time my ex-wife didn't want to hear the content of what I was trying to communicate, she attacked the way I was saying it, and, of course, there was no correct way to say it, because she didn't want anything I said to upset her. Women win lots of skirmishes that way, right up until they lose their partner.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 11:55 AM
1

Talk about wearing shit-colored glasses.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 11:50 AM
9

The song was multiple times more popular than the song the women wanted to win. Responding sexually to a woman's body is an animal response, not an objectifying one. And the physical reality of a healthy shapely body is far more real than the ego, which most spiritual traditions assert is a fiction, a collection of social narratives. Furthermore, there is nothing but affection and honest lust in the song, which is depicted as mutual anyway. A joyful song, hugely popular, won over a collection of…
/r/MensRights31/01/18 11:46 AM
234

Right. It certainly doesn't suggest that women are unfairly underpaid as a group.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 11:42 AM
837

"BBC has identified 188 individuals who could get a pay rise, but 98 of these are men and 90 are women." https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/jan/30/bbc-pay-review-claims-no-evidence-of-gender-bias
/r/MensRights31/01/18 06:09 AM
19

Ho ho ho!
/r/MensRights31/01/18 04:32 AM
22

Not surprised. Any healthy woman wants to be desired like that.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 02:41 AM
2

Even though he's male (probably) they should have listened to Yoda.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 02:15 AM
35

A frank song about enjoying a woman's body. Most viewed, most listened to on Spotify, but somehow it's sexist that it won because the women wanted it so bad. Do they not see how small this makes them look?
/r/MensRights31/01/18 01:56 AM
8

Seems more likely the year the shaming stopped working, much like overly applied pesticide makes for resistance. Trump is a great example of a shameproof bug. At some point people are gonna start shrugging when the fingers are pointed, which will be fucked for real abuse victims,.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 01:50 AM
6

Overall the resentment leaks out at Reductress, but I give them points for some frank and hilarious lampooning of women's issues.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 12:51 AM
1

Oh, they're both wonderful movies, and she's not portrayed in any way that's porno; she's a brilliant actress and both roles were hugely appealing, but a pedo confuses childlike love and sex.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 08:24 PM
572

There's a NYT video of how the song was made, and the co-writer was trying to keep Sheeran from writing that line, wanting something more PC "you are not just your body," but Sheeran went with his instincts, which was to be true to what was actually going on, and it obviously resonated. Sexual attraction is not politically correct. Video: https://www.nytimes.com/video/arts/music/100000005469604/ed-sheeran-shape-of-you.html Also I call stinky funky horseshit that her son said any such thing.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 01:57 PM
1

Perhaps a badge of some sort, sown on their jackets?
/r/MensRights29/01/18 11:09 PM
2

How about ignored? Will that work for you? Because that's what happens to every woman who talks incessantly eventually.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 10:42 PM
2

http://cdn.ebaumsworld.com/mediaFiles/picture/2235368/84046009.jpg
/r/MensRights29/01/18 10:23 PM
11

Amazing what you can get away with when you are fairly certain you won't be slugged.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 10:07 PM
9

Feminists are in denial about what a big part being a feminist had to do with Hillary losing. She ran for the office of president of women of the world, and even with all her brains and qualifications, people chose Trump.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 09:52 PM
2

She is awesome, and I hope she gives courage to others. As the ex-spouse of a woman who developed, along with her friends, false satanic abuse memory syndrome when it was popular, I have no illusions about how memories can be coached.
/r/MensRights29/01/18 09:40 PM
2

Allow us to help with your rape suit by um...raping you again...
/r/MensRights29/01/18 06:22 PM
1

I wonder how many men are skipping college because--apart from the hostile environment-- it's such a shit financial and time investment, and instead getting training and education from other sources.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 11:22 PM
1

It is just idiocy to try to make general rules about situations that can be radically different between any two people, dependent upon interior emotional reactions and responses.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 11:17 PM
2

With respect, not badgering, but getting the information they need, including DNA materials if appropriate. Failure to do this from over-solicitiousness could cause the case to fall through from lack of thoroughness. We can have the most enlightened and compassionate and fair society imaginable, but once a woman and a man get alone, it's gonna come down to investigating both of them, unless you throw due process out the window.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 11:06 PM
2

Who else will they get information from if it was just the male and the female alone? And what keeps the accused from being scared as well, given the current torrent of accusations?
/r/MensRights28/01/18 10:58 PM
12

It should be investigated the first time, yes. Believed? Nah.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 10:36 PM
1

How dare she not march in lockstep with all the feminists! What's the world coming to when a woman has a mind of her own?
/r/MensRights28/01/18 08:14 PM
2

Feminists alienating men and not breeding is natural selection at its finest.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:49 PM
2

They fire Clarkson, he gets a 1000% pay raise from Amazon. They replace Paul Hollywood with Noel Fielding, and Hollywood gets a 400% pay raise. Look for other valuable men to be shopping shows to commercial outlets.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:41 PM
2

Portman recently said that her first fan mail was a pedophilic sex fantasy. Not hard to guess why, since her two breakout roles were basically pedo bait: "Leon" and "Beautiful Girls" in which she plays a tween with a heavy crush on a 30 something neighbor turning on her charm 1000 percent. An amazing showcase for her talent, but also the stuff pedo dreams are made of.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:35 PM
3

Or they could look at the huge pay raise the former Top Gear presenters got from Amazon and start shopping shows around in the private sector. https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/jeremy-clarksons-amazon-deal-worth-6335059
/r/MensRights28/01/18 06:28 PM
1

Might as well say that Satan is causing it. Makes as much factual sense.
/r/MensRights28/01/18 05:53 AM
1

These figures go a long way towards the way women are pandered to and men are demeaned in advertising. When the West switched from a productive economy to a consumer economy, women became the celebrities, and men...you know the ones who are so hard to by for, because they don't seem to need much...became portrayed as idiots or assholes, not to be paid attention to. We may be at a tipping point, though, as women are becoming a financial drag lately, shutting down studios, businesses, leaders, and…
/r/MensRights27/01/18 09:42 AM
2

Standard stupid bully tactic. Can't win with reason so go right to violence.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 09:30 AM
1

Step one; white men are disempowered and removed from positions of power and responsibility. Step two: China eats our ramen.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 09:11 AM
1

At some point they are going to have to realize what so many men have realized before they bailed in a relationship...for some women there is simply never enough; they will always demand more.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 09:03 AM
1

These people work in the public perception business. They're protecting their careers in public and privately honing their resumes, looking to follow the old Top Gear presenters into a less uptight work environment.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 09:01 AM
2

The reason why women march in thousands, why they travel in squads, why they rush to mob and brigade together is that individually they frequently have almost no courage individually in the presence of a centered and confident man. This is awful PR for women trying to take power, so it's denied and smokescreened at every opportunity. #metoo is a desperate, though tacit, admission that many women simply cannot handle themselves when they're alone with a man, and want the state to be chaperone.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 08:51 AM
2

The costs of this crusade are mounting, in talent, in lost business and careers, in thousands of support staff losing work as leaders step down, movies flop, shows are canceled, and money meant for salaries goes to pay for lawsuits. Women have a tendency to flip out so they win all the little battles and then are astonished when they lose the wars.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 08:48 AM
6

....and then went home to update their resumes. They must have seen how the former Top Gear presenters did better for themselves outside the BBC. https://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/jeremy-clarksons-amazon-deal-worth-6335059
/r/MensRights27/01/18 08:43 AM
1

Burning cars in 3...2....
/r/MensRights27/01/18 08:34 AM
1

Cuz nobody else is.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 08:34 AM
4

"syndrome that forces her to seek attention." That covers mass murderers as well. She did the damage.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 06:44 AM
5

If she had done actual journalism, she would have talked to women there who were having a ball, women who appreciated the good pay and didn't mind the attention, women who were hoping to make contacts with powerful men, and women who were seeking sugar daddies.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 06:40 AM
1

The touching wasn't really her beef target, it was rich white guys.
/r/MensRights27/01/18 04:17 AM
1

I think guys could just stand around the stand eating pizza or chocolate croissants.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 08:29 PM
2

Those guys are really glad to do it, no doubt... /s
/r/MensRights26/01/18 08:15 PM
3

If the reporter had actually been doing journalism rather than a hit piece on wealthy white males, she might have found that a lot of these women hoped for contacts, for maybe a sugar daddy, or at least 150 pounds towards the rent for easy work..
/r/MensRights25/01/18 08:53 PM
5

So...there's a serious lack of women in comedy? Never mind that comedy has been a male province going back to jesters and fools. There are people paying attention, and like cats to a laptop, when there is public attention, women want to be there.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 08:44 PM
10

If men were 10% of the human race, soon 50% of women would be fighting each other to bear them sons, while enslaving the other 50%.
/r/MensRights25/01/18 12:51 AM
4

If a man is going his own way, there is no need to watch out for him, is there? Keep fluffing that straw...
/r/MGTOW23/01/18 06:57 AM
2

Men's Rights has nothing to do with it. This is a lazy slander.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 06:53 AM
1

I think monastic cultures have a lot to teach men about being free and having a great life. I'm wondering if it is possible to make a religion for males, technology based instead of mysticism, and exempt from laws that require diversity.
/r/MGTOW23/01/18 01:36 AM
1

.....#closethewallet
/r/MGTOW23/01/18 01:32 AM
3

closeyourwallet.
/r/MGTOW23/01/18 01:26 AM
5

Learning to be ok by yourself and developing an appreciation for the value of solitude is like discovering a goldmine in your back yard that nobody can take from you.
/r/MGTOW23/01/18 01:16 AM
3

Males are violent and must be beaten until they stop! Women are used to nobody taking their words seriously so they can say whatever they want. As they gain political power, their words will be held accountable, just like men's.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 01:03 AM
1

The term started out as a wiseass way to refer to the negative facets of masculinity and somehow grew into a concept that is too often applied to masculinity as a whole. It's insulting.
/r/MensRights23/01/18 12:28 AM
1

This is the big ol' black shadow of feminism and the current #metoo hubbub...a tendency towards mercilessness and lack of all proportion or sense of meted justice. The capacity of women in groups for viciousness is only hinted at by Black Friday riots and teen idols barely escaping being torn apart. With a sense of righteous purpose in their heads, a mob of women is something to be feared indeed.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 06:42 AM
1

The next girl along could have gone crazy for exactly the same moves as Aziz put on "Grace."
/r/MensRights21/01/18 06:38 AM
8

Pushing back is just what they're looking for, so they can feel all brave and put upon. Standing back, going about our business and supporting each other, and letting women find out their limitations and sort out their issues with power seems to be a better solution. As it is, nothing men assert can be heard in a positive way by these women...they're indoctrinated and feel entitled to be ruthless. Women are using aggression, so men this time can find a lot of use for judo, for skillful moves, no…
/r/MensRights21/01/18 06:13 AM
9

Women freezing on the street, men at home watching the game or playing video games. Women: "We've got 'em on the run now, ladies!"
/r/MensRights20/01/18 10:12 PM
1

Check out the sidebar on the main subreddit page. Lots of good info there.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 08:54 PM
0

What, is he her mom now?
/r/MensRights19/01/18 08:48 PM
10

Women have not become more like men. They're roleplaying and making society look away from all the ways they're not like men, to bend the rules, lighten the load, change the job site, etc. The male roles are just another outfit in their mental wardrobe. They can do this because they are quite flexible in their self image and enjoy putting on different looks and acts. This doesn't work very well for men, who tend to build themselves up through long work and then use that self to be useful and acc…
/r/MensRights19/01/18 08:45 PM
2

Much like other religions.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 08:41 PM
3

A war among women is how they're going to get themselves sorted out, since they've invalidated the opinions of men.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 06:31 PM
10

They're men--how can they be innocent?
/r/MensRights19/01/18 01:59 PM
1

Why is a Vogon in that job anyway?
/r/MensRights19/01/18 01:53 PM
1

Well, yeah. Children are the future. Have some and mother them properly.
/r/MensRights19/01/18 01:45 PM
4

That's it, idiot. I'm blocking you.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 10:55 PM
2

Wow. That conclusion has some major bootmarks on it. There's a world of difference between personal grooming, especially if it helps fit into a prejudiced society that prefers straight hair, and the appropriation and systematic obscuring of the origins of most of the original art forms the US has given to the world.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 10:31 PM
3

Here's some frank discussion by a female employer about the extra hassles of having female employees: https://clarissasblog.com/2014/05/14/i-dont-want-to-hire-women/
/r/MensRights18/01/18 09:55 PM
-1

A cosmetic procedure is a fairly harmless thing, and god help us, the eighties were full of white people sporting afros... Totally unlike the ripping off of blues, jazz, dance and pretty much everything else original that's come out of black America, with no attribution and little or no renumeration.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 09:29 PM
3

I haven't seen the full film and don't have a lot of interest, but from what I've read, the men are there, they are just devoid of much in the way of positive qualities.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 09:05 PM
8

Lol, in the actual periods her movies are set in, women got raped routinely. Nice to live in a fantasy world when you're rich and pretty enough that you don't need tits.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 06:31 PM
4

A good article by about Ronan Farrow that shoots holes in Dylan's story, and paints Woody in a far fairer light, if anyone wants to stop scoldilocksing. https://ronanfarrowletter.wordpress.com/2018/01/04/moses-farrow-speaks-out/
/r/MensRights18/01/18 06:29 PM
3

Um, yeah, unless they were into it, say if they were submissive, in which case his moves could have turned them on. But, why miss a chance to scold and be the "good" gender?
/r/MensRights18/01/18 02:16 PM
1

I doubt they'd mention such a thing publicly, as it would further damage their brand. In private, I'm pretty sure some have wised the fuck up.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 01:59 PM
1

Oh, don't. I've still had my share of awful experiences. I just never showed up with flowers and chocolates and stars in my eyes and a full wallet.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 01:52 PM
7

I'm guessing this guy was raised to be "not like most men," and has discovered that he has all the capacities of any man, probably from trying to repress natural horniness only to have it come out in an awkward way. The good news is that he has all the capacities for good and for usefulness that a man possesses as well.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 08:23 AM
6

This is all somehow the doing of the Patriarchy, of course... /s
/r/MensRights18/01/18 05:19 AM
18

If it was just met with conductance, it wouldn't work at all.
/r/MensRights18/01/18 03:38 AM
6

My first exposure to girls was as a sailor in Japan, where, in addition to bar girls, I dated a couple of high school girls. Spoiled me for US girls for life.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 08:45 PM
0

One woman's trash is another woman's treasure, honey.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 07:18 PM
7

In pretty much every discussion of rape, sexual assault, etc., the speaker is very careful to affirm how gravely bad these things are and how much punishment is deserved. Why do they need to affirm this so much? Because the only thing, in most cases, that separates sexual assault or even date rape from sexy funtime is that the one person isn't going for it. This locates a whole area of legal jeopardy at the inner experience of one of the partners, regardless of the experience or intent of the ot…
/r/MensRights17/01/18 11:14 AM
2

It's easy to imagine this as damage control, to make "Grace" the one bad sheep, and try to distract people from wondering what the percentage of #metoo accusers are also self-centered cognitive infants.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 08:19 AM
1

The language and tone of the protests are operatic and predictable. Outrage is beginning to be really boring.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 06:58 AM
5

The videos and writings of Karen Straughan are quite eloquent and thorough in discussing why people are anti-feminist. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ut2VVAW0MwM
/r/MensRights17/01/18 06:49 AM
13

Man's gotta work. It's clear to all that he's doing it for his career. You know, like the women that blew Weinstein.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 06:42 AM
5

Sucks that he's got to do damage control when he should be naming and shaming her, if not suing.
/r/MensRights17/01/18 12:09 AM
12

Well, that's me told, then, isn't it? You can believe in your map as strongly as you wish, but if it doesn't match the territory, you're going to run into stuff.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 04:01 PM
15

Because men are usually discounted as woman haters when they critique feminism, and also because Karen knows her shit and argues clearly and to the point.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 03:42 PM
11

I'll let a woman talk for me then: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DMhAFH2O0pc --edited with different video
/r/MensRights16/01/18 03:34 PM
21

My analogy was not carelessly chosen. Feminism as commonly practiced today, shows dogmatic features of a religion, particularly a belief in Patriarchy and all of the excesses that are excused as part of the fight against this monster. Feminism shows little regard for the many areas of life where men are more at risk, and functions as a PR operation to mask and minimize areas where women do not come off in a flattering light.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 02:54 PM
74

I'm 71, and have never seen verbal harassment of women at male work sites, except in movies.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 02:49 PM
6

It is a repudiation of any responsibility on the part of women to keep themselves safe, to put all the onus on men to protect them regardless of what they look like, where they go, and how much they get intoxicated. Basically Victorian protectionism with tattoos.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 01:14 PM
31

No more than a belief in goodness makes one a Christian.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 01:11 PM
1

Detractors of this tweet war have posited that a lot of the #metoo protests involved just this sort of situation; this article provides them a concrete example.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 06:20 AM
3

Picturing a long line of mimes.
/r/MensRights16/01/18 06:17 AM
13

They'll be pretty damned shocked when the lawsuits commence.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 02:30 PM
5

I'm guessing that a fair number of the #metoo mob have some kind of emotional block, where they have a pre-pubescent aversion to the opposite sex and are using feminism to cover it up.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 08:33 AM
1

Oh, I think society will find good uses for us aside from being beasts of burden for harpies.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 08:31 AM
0

Of course, a non-blinkered takeaway is that people preferred someone as bad as Trump to a woman who appeared to be compaigning to be president/savior of women and children of the world pretty much exclusively..oh and some gays.
/r/MensRights14/01/18 07:57 AM
6

Driver seemed to be an intelligent person, too. Guess it was just the directing. -edited for grammar.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 11:19 PM
1

Much admiration, added to what she already gets from me.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 07:15 PM
3

The subject is really the continuing demonization of Woody Allen, because it's making feminists crazy that they can't seem to bring him down no matter how hard they accuse.
/r/MensRights13/01/18 03:55 AM
20

Emma Watson discussing women's rights is like a triple lottery winner discussing financial planning.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 10:56 PM
8

Hope they'll get the dimwit mediocre craven dolt they deserve.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 07:24 PM
2

If you work at a job in an industry that was conceived, built and is maintained mainly by men, it's probably going to reflect that gender. This is not a deliberate slight to women, though, of course, many experience it that way, being allowed breathtaking amounts of self-centeredness by our popular culture.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 02:19 PM
26

Totally discounting how many women have had plum roles in Woody Allen films that furthered their careers. Without "Mighty Aphrodite," people would just know Mira Sorvino as Paul's daughter. The western female impulse to look as innocent and good as possible in any situation keeps them from being as productive as they might be otherwise. Looking for a woman honest enough to acknowledge Allen's strong roles for women...Diane Keaton, at least? -edited for spelling
/r/MensRights12/01/18 02:14 PM
4

He made a lot of money for a lot of people. Wanted his name on as many pictures as he could, and his spooge in as many trophy women as he could; driven, aggressive, shameless. Same guy, same ego.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 02:45 AM
21

Beats a sexual assault charge. If Top Gear's Clarkson had touched a boob instead of smacking a male producer in the face, there would be no Grand Tour on Amazon. Weird.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 03:03 PM
3

About Milo: The truth doesn't care who says it.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 11:26 AM
1

Thanks for the heads-up. I enjoyed several articles on the site and have added it to my daily news folder.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 11:24 AM
3

Feminists probably hate mature and sexually healthy women like Deneuve more than they hate men. It sure seems like they are the eventual recipients of the blowback feminists incite.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 07:46 AM
2

Soon just the word tr***er will be triggering.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 07:41 AM
1

Williams was investing in a reputation as a team player. Wahlberg was protecting his brand.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 07:38 AM
5

I worked for years at a company where most of the bosses were women, where it was friendly and there was not much undermining, once the one queen bee was sent on her way. Oh, and also, the company lost money every year and went through CEO's almost annually.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 07:35 AM
10

Says the person who owes a large portion of her success to her facial structure.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 07:00 AM
3

Her pretty face and big eyes have gotten her through easy so far; I guess she's betting on them swaying the judge and jury.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 06:50 AM
1

Much like conversations about communism in China... Original NYT article: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/05/opinion/golden-globes-metoo.html?_r=0
/r/MensRights11/01/18 06:19 AM
7

Hmm, your forceful statements would be interesting if you had some assessments to link to that are somewhat as reputable as those who say the science and his conclusions from it are largely correct.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 06:08 AM
12

Fine. Just don't ask for political power.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 10:45 PM
3

99 other women is a bit more than several.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 10:40 PM
6

By all being silent, they shared some condemnation. By speaking, they would have presented individual targets. Pretty sure they had been advised by their handlers beforehand.
/r/MensRights10/01/18 01:06 PM
1

Ohh, you be a sasshole, sister!
/r/MensRights09/01/18 04:33 PM
2

There will be something after it, always is. This one has a lot of juice because it's drawn some blood. It has a lot of potential to backfire amazingly; we'll see.
/r/MensRights09/01/18 12:41 AM
4

I think for many women, all the drama is its own reward. Lots of people agitated and babbling....big fun! Then there's simple revenge for real and imagined slights and for the discomfort of having to fit in to a world largely imagined, built, and maintained by men, while denying that fact.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 11:48 PM
4

LOL, Hollywood fakery. What part of "show business" was she unclear about? Counting down til her own past turds start floating to the surface. Only guilty people crusade this viciously.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 11:41 PM
44

Seems like he's done his due diligence. Should be an interesting suit.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 09:48 PM
5

By 2020 most actresses will be mo-cap played by Andy Serkis.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 01:50 PM
1

The mainstream press in the past embraced eugenics, prohibition, cigarettes as a healthy habit, rounding up Japanese, and many other dumb ideas that have passed on. Watching how they back away from this one should be interesting.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 09:53 AM
1

I see nothing wrong with the quid pro quo for willing actresses, other than us getting saddled with watching mediocre actresses in parts beyond their talents. Weinstein's shittiness was in trying for trophies, for ungettable women, and using coercion to make it happen. In other words, being a ruthless fucking closer, which he was in business, but taking that into the bedroom. Fuck him, and double fuck him for being a symbol that feminists can tar other men with.
/r/MensRights08/01/18 09:22 AM
6

Oh, Rolling Stone, have you learned nothing? As if anyone fixed anything while denying their part in the problem. We've been through this before, when women were breaking up barrooms filled with righteousness and femininity--while in their purses were vials of morphine and cocaine. Then men started AA, and removed the stigma from alcoholism, and, would you believe it? Women started coming out of their pantries where they'd been hitting the sherry. It's an infantile view of femininity to equate i…
/r/MensRights07/01/18 12:12 PM
1

Standard internet precautions here as everywhere else about giving info out. If you liked "The Red Pill," then the videos of Girl Writes What, aka Karen Straughan, I can recommend highly. She builds strong arguments with real logic and can give you a richer picture of the gender world you're entering. https://www.youtube.com/user/girlwriteswhat/playlists?disable_polymer=1
/r/MensRights07/01/18 08:19 AM
10

I wish I had been warned about my last wife.
/r/MensRights07/01/18 08:15 AM
7

This is straight up propaganda level stuff.
/r/MensRights05/01/18 06:52 PM
14

And the ability to listen endlessly about how they need to change...
/r/MensRights05/01/18 06:42 PM
31

I just realized the other day that her job description is literally drama queen.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 05:44 PM
7

She deserves the man who fits this description.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 09:41 PM
19

Article this week in Huffpost "Many Faces of Opioid Addiction:" Only shows women. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/america-on-opioids-dispatches_us_59dbe9d9e4b0208970cf222a
/r/MensRights03/01/18 05:21 PM
18

I've been watching marches for 60 years. They feel good at the time, but don't accomplish much. A general walkout by men would definitely get some attention, though.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 04:12 AM
2

(#ohyoupoordears)
/r/MensRights03/01/18 02:15 AM
13

We can't largely ignore the needs of boys and project all of the crappy stuff onto them, and treat them as defective girls in school and then suddenly, as they reach dating age, expect them to be perfect gentlemen. Boys learn from adult men, and they are largely systematically segregated from them as they grow up. And most adult men have become shy about displaying their masculinity as well, from years of disdain and defamation of their gender.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 02:13 AM
1

I think the principle of innocent until proven guilty has been so solidly engraved in our laws and constitution precisely because the first impulse is to follow the mob; the temptation is especially great when things are uncertain and confusing. Like the head giant in Harry Potter, the impulse is just to kill 'em to simplify things. I do wonder if we've become too stupid to survive as a nation. Social media has put our impulsivity and stupidity on steroids. A principle of social anthropology is …
/r/MensRights02/01/18 05:17 PM
-1

A big fuck you to all the men who didn't choose to be the recipient of her nudity and to need to deal with arousal they can't act on. And a touch does not merit slugging.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 12:29 PM
1

The rationale is insane, the motive is malicious perfidy and greed.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 10:12 AM
2

Oh, if I was worth what Trump is worth, I can guarantee my past would rise up for a payday in some form or other. I certainly don't think people should be--and I include Trump and Weinstein in this--punished in any way by the government for anything they are not convicted of by the courts. What employers and media do with accusations is not under that kind of constraint, and a whiff of bad PR has ended the careers of many good people, going back forever. Perhaps this time will be remembered as n…
/r/MensRights02/01/18 05:31 AM
5

These are not powerful women. They are valued employees with a lot of social media followers. Powerful is 235 producing credits: Weinstein. Making Schindler's List and Jurassic Park simultaneously: Spielberg. Making Star Wars on a shoestring and basically inventing the digital special effects business: Lucas. Power lies with the investors, the boards of directors, the advertising tie-ins, the box office, the foreign market, the streaming market. Until something big changes, men will build and wo…
/r/MensRights02/01/18 03:22 AM
-2

I meant it's her money and not Hillary's. I think it's a fine way to spend money, personally. Rape needs to be proved, but Trump certainly has been abusive to women.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 03:14 AM
4

Well, it's her money.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 01:32 AM
26

Feminism is, to a great degree, a PR enterprise. Anything that does not show women in a flattering light is ignored or discounted. Nobody ever went broke from flattering women, and feminism is a very profitable enterprise indeed.
/r/MensRights02/01/18 12:18 AM
3

That was a long shower. Your hands must have been wrinkly :-)
/r/MensRights02/01/18 12:15 AM
3

Ugh, her.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 10:22 PM
24

Demanding stuff is not a powerful position. Creating stuff, as in United Artists, is powerful. Make some studios, ladies, and compete if you can.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 10:15 PM
1

Well, the two other alternatives, i.e. no swarthy foreigners, or everyone together with possible gang assaults, aren't winners either.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 10:13 PM
3

Yeah, that's the feminism talking. He thinks he's a bad dog, and not just a regular old guy.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 10:09 PM
3

Males like variety. Women are attracted to males with power and money. Tale as old as time.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 03:31 PM
24

I wouldn't know. The Young Men's Christian Association pool is usually full of women.
/r/MensRights01/01/18 12:21 PM
59

Maybe the Satan you think you're looking at, lady, is the Satan you're looking with.
/r/MensRights31/12/17 02:01 PM
33

In the past, women could just flip out and make enough noise that men would find a solution, since they had all the political power. It is dawning on women that men can't fix this for them, since it's their own relationship to power and the truth at issue. It's going to be messy, because women have had to rely on dissembling constantly to negotiate the world of men, and to always appear in the best light they could manage. As a man, I feel like my best course is to set my goals, and refrain from…
/r/MensRights30/12/17 01:53 PM
191

Seems like women will be the ones to rein in feminism, since people seem to have a better bullshit filter for their own gender.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 12:23 PM
3

It seems like the people who are most negatively affected by feminism's advances are traditional women, attractive women, feminine women. I don't think this is unintended. So many feminists are people who for one reason or another are losers in the traditional mating games.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 07:59 AM
19

The brilliant thing about MGTOW is the "O" part. No agreement, no organization, no philosophy needed. Some will support you, some won't. Always your own choice though.
/r/MensRights30/12/17 02:57 AM
1

I'm guessing before the show is halfway through, the sheer awkwardness of this move is going to be apparent to everyone and they'll have to carry on being obviously stupid through to the end.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 11:30 PM
1

I haven't seen him live but I've watched the video of the Dublin Multiply show several times. I'm a 71 year old guy, veteran of San Francisco music scene and I'm blown away by the guy's talent, spirit, courage, work ethic, and generosity. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lR3vIjAZDnM
/r/MensRights29/12/17 09:28 AM
1

Hmm, let's see you knock out a stadium with a tiny guitar and loop pedals like Ed Sheeran. No? I thought not.
/r/MensRights29/12/17 06:25 AM
9

When they hit 35, many of these same women will go to the other side of the argument, suddenly seeing the "immorality" of it all.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 06:48 PM
7

We have laws against rape, police and courts, and sophisticated methods of investigation. Since we have these things, I feel no obligation to give a shit about what happens sexually to women I don't personally know or about ways to "fix" the problem of harassment that has taken place in the past.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 07:08 PM
1

I'd be interested if there was a way to gather statistics on men using free or inexpensive non-accredited educational resources online to adequately support their career goals. Traditional college was always a squandering of time--but now it's a huge financial waste as well.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 06:50 PM
2

Probably this drove a few viewers to Karen's videos, where they might have gotten exposed to her deadly accurate and eloquent dissection of feminism.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 06:43 PM
38

Investigate yes, believe, no. But, unlike what feminists assert, they are loathe to let a guilty person go. A few multi-million dollar payouts for wrongful imprisonment have made them a bit more circumspect in the face of feminist pleas for white knighthood.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 10:56 PM
1

Thanks, I'll check it out.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 04:13 PM
1

Yeah, wise women will understand that #metoo has a couple meanings.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 03:48 PM
1

Awesome quote!
/r/MensRights26/12/17 03:08 PM
8

Yeah, poor men with their impaired critical thinking--which they invented.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 02:45 PM
2

Physically, yes. TV and movies understand that audiences eat up situations of female emotional suffering, and every day the wrongs against women are on the front page of the major news outlets.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 02:37 PM
11

The spending power of women as well as the insecurity of many of them has driven media and entertainment to make this faustian bargain to always paint women in the best light and to portray men as dolts or monsters, short circuiting their vote in spending decisions. Faustian because many women have bought into the pandering and have become unappeasable ego monsters, and the culture is eventually going to have to set boundaries against their excesses, which won't be pretty, but I, for one, will b…
/r/MensRights26/12/17 02:33 PM
5

Was a joke alluding to the cognitive immaturity of feminists.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 02:26 PM
5

Yep, that should fix things right up.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 02:25 PM
1

The costs of trying to appease feminists keep growing; now they are absurd, leading one to wonder just how many lawsuits and malpractice awards and disruption of business and education have to happen before there is some general realization that it will never be enough. Feminists will wake up the next day after a win and decide something else is wrong. Endlessly, because they can't ever get enough of what they don't really want.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 01:41 PM
6

I was taking a pee and decided that white knights and male feminists in general were cognitive pedophiles, and I grinned a lot.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 01:32 PM
7

Fine, go recruit them out of social science departments; we have enough of those already.
/r/MensRights26/12/17 06:47 AM
6

If you're in a corrupt system, all of your efforts get subverted to support the dominant belief systems. Refusing to participate is actually the most powerful action you can take, provided you do positive things for yourself and others with your freedom.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 11:08 PM
9

They write this stuff because some women eat it up. Some women expect positive reinforcement for their behavior no matter how immoral or hurtful, and for some journalists, the customer is always right.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 09:49 AM
10

My last wife developed fantasies of childhood satanic abuse when her friends did; wrote a poem to a woman's newspapers about her projections on me as a monster, which got me fired the next day... I haven't touched a woman since 1995 though I've sexted with some in Second Life, which was safe fun.
/r/MensRights25/12/17 01:48 AM
12

Women don't get found out because if their husband is taking care of things economically, they'll not fall in love with their side guy.
/r/MensRights24/12/17 11:20 PM
2

Here's a poor lady in need of support; maybe you can have her for a personal assistant! http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/las-vegas-woman-charged-gunning-roommates-51971460
/r/MensRights24/12/17 05:06 PM
68

Sure, just give back the right to vote, speak, assemble, and own property. We'll take care of you inoffensive harmless little darlings.
/r/MensRights24/12/17 09:01 AM
11

If comparative uselessness is a virtue, then sure.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 08:35 PM
14

Yeah, men have the capacity to be violent. All of us. Also all of women. Men get held to the standard of the worst of us, while violent and abusive women are usually excused.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 02:43 PM
1

No joy in a soy boy toy.
/r/MensRights23/12/17 06:06 AM
2

If there is a spot on every video I watch, then I need to clean the screen.
/r/MGTOW22/12/17 02:48 PM
6

Pretty weird since Episode IV-VI was about initiation into righteous manhood based on timeless myths, and Episode I-III was about how that could fail without the right conditions. So now we're condemning maleness in general?
/r/MensRights22/12/17 05:02 AM
19

Once a man and a woman are alone, unless there is video or audio recording, it doesn't matter what the laws are; you either let some rapists go free, or jail innocent men without due process. The rest is posturing.
/r/MensRights22/12/17 04:59 AM
2

That was yesterday's entry in this same series.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 07:52 AM
2

They shouldn't let Vogons hold office in the first place. They try to read poetry at office parties.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 02:19 AM
19

I want to see 'em try to come after Gandalf.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 12:58 AM
2

Yeah, it's ok to condemn men in general, but my friend is one of the "good ones," so this is getting out of hand.
/r/MensRights21/12/17 12:57 AM
1

That's up to the individual... There is no general one size fits all solution. The whole conversation about this is built on concepts that don't fit with reality.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 09:51 PM
2

Help them realize, if they are open to it, that each gender has benefits and liabilities. If they aren't open to it, use your breath for better purposes. Here's some alternate stats: http://www.realsexism.com/
/r/MensRights20/12/17 01:37 PM
2

Yeah, it was incomplete and sloppy of me to just mention the socialization element. It's innate for us to want to keep women safe and healthy to birth and raise the next generation for the maintenance of the community. That's 400K years of tribal living that has shaped our brains and emotions. I do think the challenge now for men, now that they don't need to be cogs or cannon fodder, is to learn to care for ourselves. And the challenge for women, now that they have political power and equal say …
/r/MensRights20/12/17 09:53 AM
-1

A lot of the women accusers already have had their careers wind down and seem to be trying to revive them with the publicity or to score some punishment bucks. Looking at you, crazy Rose.
/r/MensRights20/12/17 12:06 AM
3

That's why I'm on this site and participating all I can. From small beginnings. It used to be functional for men to be ready to sacrifice themselves with no thanks for the good of the tribe/village/nation. We're not needed for that and it's time that we were emancipated to explore and express ourselves for ourselves and for each other. I believe men will create a post-capitalist society out of our innate curiosity and drive.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 09:17 PM
3

I prefer my women hard-boiled.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 09:14 PM
7

Well and eloquently argued. It seems women, at least for now, will need to lead in the fight against the excesses of feminism. Years ago, as a chubby middle aged professor, I well remember retreating to my office to eat lunch just to spare the effort of averting my gaze constantly from the undergraduate rites of spring.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 09:03 PM
1

Guilt, manipulation, social pressure.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 08:27 PM
9

Awesome contribution! Thanks.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 08:27 PM
3

Try not to stay with "can't." Best get some counselling or some literature on anger management. You can learn to switch the script and stop giving assholes free rent in your head. You can learn to do it as a free man, or have another opportunity in prison.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 05:19 PM
120

Men are not socialized to be sympathetic to their own gender, but to women. And women are sympathetic to their own gender. This can leave decent men with no one on their side.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 05:16 PM
5

Feminism is a haven for women who are phobic about men, and about sex with men. If that's the case, then anything that suggests sex with men looks and feels like rape.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 04:44 PM
2

It's scary indeed, because guilty people with low self esteem do bad shit, because they've taken on that projection onto themselves. It could end up being a nightmare for women.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 04:43 PM
9

Whatever you focus on becomes more important to you, fills up the foreground of life. Find better stuff to focus on.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 04:39 PM
3

Here's a non-Buzzfeed article about it: https://www.teenvogue.com/story/womens-march-cofounder-sexual-misconduct
/r/MensRights19/12/17 12:58 PM
4

I've never taken 9 minutes in my life.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 04:56 AM
1

A lot of women equate empowerment as having everyone hustling to make them feel safe and cared about. That's all these things are for.
/r/MensRights19/12/17 04:52 AM
0

Maybe someday they'll be able to actually be in the house...
/r/MensRights19/12/17 04:50 AM
1

Wow you pulled that right out of the air. I meant no such thing. Smells like a standard talking point.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 07:02 PM
9

Letting women off the hook even when they say yes, because it wasn't an experience that lived up to hopes. Not helping!
/r/MensRights18/12/17 08:21 AM
9

I watch a lot of British panel shows, and, based on the jokes that fly there that wouldn't fly here, they're not as totally smothered.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 03:38 AM
8

Short answer: No. Long answer: Nope. Not in print, anyway. Privately, lots of heads nodding. Best stand aside as feminists abuse their power in the name of standing up to abuse of power.
/r/MensRights18/12/17 03:33 AM
1

Men don't need to be instructed about every little thing.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 11:58 PM
17

I used to think it was just because women do most of the retail purchasing, but I'm coming to believe that the world is overwhelming to many of them without the historical protection of home and community they evolved in, and they need bolstering at every turn to not freak out in a world men made and run.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 09:56 PM
8

Somehow I suspect down the road this is all going to make the Rolling Stone debacle look tiny and tame.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 09:51 PM
0

If you're wearing a moustache and I say that it's obscene, that doesn't make you wrong. It means that I have added a moral spin to my preferences. Men pursue women, always have. Mostly that's been understood and only recently have feminists whomped up the fantasy that it is a social programming and not in any way evolutionary, so therefore social stigma is all that's needed to eradicate the behavior. And also they believe they have the right to ignore the evolutionary bent of women to seek out a…
/r/MensRights17/12/17 09:03 PM
7

As usual, zero recognition of the complicity of women in these situations, the hordes of women who swarm and groom (yeah, I said it!) and pander to powerful men. At some point the discrepancy will not be ignoreable. Two sides to every story--unless you're a feminist.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 09:01 PM
0

What if it's something that the male gender of most mammals do, which is being proceptive? Men will push for sex, always have and always will.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 02:44 PM
8

As the GOP made a faustian bargain with racists and fascists, the Dems made that bargain with feminists as women gained social power when the US switched from a production economy to a consumption one and women began to be pandered to and flattered at every turn. Since, like the GOP, there was a bedrock of bullshit built in, things just keep spinning further out of control . The old powerful democratic leaders have been replaced by nice but largely ineffective men and gynocentric women. They can…
/r/MensRights17/12/17 09:06 AM
6

Milano hasn't got the heft to knock Matt Damon out of his orbit. People that see his movies won't be swayed by this.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 12:17 AM
2

It's a nice inconsequential thing to bitch about that's seasonal.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 10:59 PM
1

Perfect.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 10:57 PM
3

In the past, women could get their way by being unreasonable until men fixed things for them to stop the irritation. This is impractical now because women have political power and with that comes the expectation of reasonableness and compromise, and in addition, if the target of their shit-flipping is men, there is a limit to which other men will be able to fix this. Finally, if misbehavior is observed in the majority of a gender, then it is simply behavior, and the problem lies with the accuser…
/r/MensRights16/12/17 09:58 PM
2

Men cause problems because solving problems causes other problems. Sitting and bitching just causes problems but doesn't solve them. If men were 10% of the race, then 100% of the women would be under their thumb, with no men to protect them from this.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 09:41 PM
9

They'll find that men will be difficult to get lined up to kill, but they're welcome to do more of their share of the grunt work and problem solving that keeps things going. Men cause more problems because getting things done creates other problems. If you're sitting and bitching, you're not causing the problems, but you're sure not helping.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 09:20 PM
56

No point in a mother poisoning her child, or faking cancer or a pregnancy either. What a predictable dimwit. Such courage, blindsiding an 80 year old man when that was not what he was there to discuss.
/r/MensRights16/12/17 09:01 PM
15

Being attracted to sexual characteristics of the opposite sex is precisely normal heterosexuality. Perversity is when you shame that.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 02:33 PM
14

From Hillary on down, feminists are confused that they are not handed political power when they are concerned about only half of the population.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 02:28 PM
9

Raised as a slave with a greedy master, torn from his mother, possessed of power he hasn't the character to control, deeply insecure, groomed by Palpatine to be arrogant, and all they see is sexual predator. SMFH.
/r/MensRights15/12/17 02:25 PM
3

What can you possibly get a woman who is wealthy, famous, and beautiful for Christmas? Oh, victim sympathy! Never can get too much of that!
/r/MensRights15/12/17 06:26 AM
5

If you keep changing up what is expected of men, of course they will look like they are bumbling; it's a sucker's game, designed like much of feminist thinking, to flatter women who are otherwise losers in the general genetic game.
/r/MensRights14/12/17 01:12 AM
1

And...this is why matriarchies are rare.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 08:03 PM
8

Gotta have a man around to project all their shadow onto. Cuz feminists are a big ol bunch of posers, for sure.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 02:08 PM
1

Cronkite, yeah. Lauer et al? Not seeing the father there.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 02:05 PM
46

Gosh, you mean institutionalized shaming is unpopular? Hope the media finds out.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 01:34 AM
3

Pretty sure male gamers spend a lot more money on games and rigs; that's a pretty lucrative market to tap if they can get women into it.
/r/MensRights13/12/17 01:33 AM
1

Happens often enough that there's even a DSM-IV diagnosis: Munchausen's by Proxy.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 10:27 PM
6

You could order that special drink from the bar...oh wait, that's just for women...
/r/MensRights12/12/17 08:39 PM
6

Would be a service to the male to hear these so it stays just one date.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 06:38 PM
4

Why women don't rule; they mean girl each other and lose effectiveness.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 06:37 PM
23

Live by innuendo, die by innuendo. Bullshit stinks no matter who's flinging it.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 06:35 PM
18

It's not a backlash. It's a sensible response. Calling it a backlash just adds to the misandry.
/r/MensRights12/12/17 06:11 AM
2

It's an inside job. You focus on women you admire and would defend because of who they are, not because of their genital assignment. May I offer as a starter, Ms. Tai Wilkenfeld, an amazing bass player who I would take a knife for. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXv54DfJ3bI
/r/MensRights12/12/17 06:03 AM
25

So much of feminist complaint comes back to projection, doesn't it?
/r/MensRights11/12/17 04:32 PM
2

No default. That's like saying should the default position with african americans be criminal or innocent.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 04:30 PM
2

I think we should stop using the word trigger, because it rhymes with N****r, and could be being used as code for racist jokes! /s
/r/MensRights11/12/17 04:28 PM
10

If a woman walks around with that attitude towards men, she is bound to meet a high percentage of angry ones.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 01:59 PM
62

The most charitable view of this tendency of some women is that they don't really take themselves or the impact they have on the world seriously. They see men as having all the power and themselves as powerless little bystanders whose words will have no effect other than to amuse. The women who have had their accounts suspended on Twitter for saying all men are scum--they are astonished that they are being included in the rules, as if, since they were women, their words were not to be taken seri…
/r/MensRights11/12/17 01:54 PM
12

Some women think that being "sans merci" makes them a "belle dame." (Apologies to John Keats) They're just being assholes.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 01:52 PM
2

Men get power for access to sex, because women are attracted to power. Henry Kissinger, for example, is about as ugly as a wart, and a war criminal. Here are the women he dated: Henry Kissinger has been in relationships with Samantha Eggar (1972 - 1973), Jill St. John (1971), Joanna Barnes (1970), Candice Bergen (1970), Gina Lollobrigida, Marlo Thomas and Barbara Walters. To characterize this situation as one created exclusively by males is a black-tongued, cynical and destructive lie, designed …
/r/MensRights11/12/17 01:43 PM
2

And men need to find ways to support each other that go beyond advice to toughen up. I'm leaning toward looking at monastic cultures through the ages to see if there are elements that could be brought into male organizations, apart from, you know, fucking boys and whipping their own backs. I think pursuing spiritual goals would inoculate men from many of the pitfalls of the gender conflicts. A slender wallet and a dick kept securely in one's pants can keep a man out of a lot of trouble.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 01:27 PM
12

When women had no political power and were dependent on men addressing problems, social tantrums and unreasonableness had usefulness, namely irritating men enough that they acted in ways that would calm women down. Now that women have political agency there is need for alliances, compromise, and reason, and this kind of moral panic just harms everyone.
/r/MensRights11/12/17 03:59 AM
10

You like stats? Here's some stats for you. http://www.realsexism.com/
/r/MensRights11/12/17 03:43 AM
42

I guess that would include police, so that the only men out would be unpoliced curfew breakers. Looks like they thought this through about as well as could be expected.
/r/MensRights10/12/17 05:32 PM
1

Depends on the circumstances. A drunk cougar: no. A waitress aiming for a higher tip: sketchy. A cheek-pinching female relative in a cloud of cologne: part of the price of family. Co-worker at an office party: time to take protective cover among others.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 11:47 PM
2

Sitting there, warm and safe surrounded by the creations of men, protected by them, and spared backbreaking labor by their willingness to undertake it. And they say men don't grow up.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 05:07 PM
2

Men's issues psychologist Robert Moore used to begin his lectures by bellowing in his southern accent, "A nice man is an oxymoron!" The word "nice" was originally an insult. The deal is that men with functioning sex drives are motivated to pursue and catch women (or men if that's their bent) for sex. The ones who pretend they are not are the ones to watch carefully.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 05:04 PM
4

The results should be interesting, since a majority of women would rather work under the supervision of men rather than women.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 05:00 PM
11

Can feminists honestly be thinking that men will enthusiastically support this purge? Or even the female staffers who passionately defended Franken? This was a stupid battle to have won and will cost them a lot of previous allies.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 04:58 PM
1

You have a point. I have been far less susceptible to shaming from women all my life (though I felt guilty about it) than most men. I remember when I was 16 and my mother got it that she couldn't shame me any further, that it didn't work. She went into hysterics and by the time I was 17 I was in the Navy, having been treated as a non-person in my home. I was a terrible sailor, but I'm grateful I had that structure while I matured for a while.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 08:42 AM
1

I'm wondering if monastic life will arise again for men. To live in such a way that they offer nothing to women and are protected by a spiritual framework that can't be assailed.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 08:36 AM
1

Acknowledging the extent to which they owe their safety, health, and security to the creations and maintenance of men just freaks feminists out, and they try to shut down any viewpoint that doesn't belittle and deny men's contributions or characterize them as toxic.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 05:46 AM
2

Karen Straughan does a great job in one of her videos laying out how women have an own-gender prejudice that men don't have. Men are socialized to protect women and not have much in the way of solidarity with other men. This might be due for a change, as men find themselves ever more cautious about being in any way vulnerable to women.
/r/MensRights09/12/17 05:42 AM
3

And got me lucrative speaking gigs!
/r/MensRights08/12/17 04:12 PM
3

Yep, totally not dependent on the entire infrastructure of the society and economy built and maintained by men.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 03:06 PM
1

By 2020, 50% of female roles will be motion performance animation. So much less hassle.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 02:43 PM
28

Ironic that a movement all about stopping abuse of power is massively abusing that power. When you point a finger, there are three pointing back at you. Feminist shaming is like an antibiotic that wipes out the helpful microbes, leaving the field clear for the superbugs.
/r/MensRights08/12/17 04:17 AM
14

MGTOWs though, they're just women hatrz
/r/MensRights08/12/17 02:14 AM
4

Yep. Republicans know something about men that Democrats forgot some time back. Men are supposed to be useful. Nice is a plus. Republicans keep Trump and Moore because they're useful. Dems are tossing useful men away because they're not nice enough.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 09:38 PM
3

This is a brilliant and elegantly argued essay. I take issue only with her agreement with Hanna Rosin about modern life having no use for men. Men will create the next thing, they always do. Then when it is successful, women will complain about being left out. The modern world that women feel so comfortable in was created by men. If there are no jobs that need their strength, they will generate contests and honors for them. Men are generative, and that fire does not go out.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 06:35 PM
1

Maybe she needed a couple months to brush her hair ;-)
/r/MensRights07/12/17 03:49 PM
1

As usual, her argument is devastatingly solid, fair, and eloquent.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 03:48 PM
1

In going after male elites by actions that throw male non-elites under the bus, feminists are ensuring that they will not have the political base to acquire power. No one will hand power to people who write off half of the populace.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 03:27 PM
1

"Hey, you with the penis. Stand there while we rub all of this Harvey Weinstein stink all over you. That's a good boy!"
/r/MensRights07/12/17 03:23 PM
1

Women lie about anything that will get them sympathetic attention: Cancer, pregnancy, rape, employment unfairness...fuck, there's even a whole psychiatric diagnosis for women poisoning their children for attention and sympathy--Munchausen's By Proxy. Women eat up sympathy and pity. It's what fuels dozens of advice columns and daytime TV shows.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 03:20 PM
1

Men can live far more simply than women. Perhaps if large numbers of us slip out of the harness and live simple non-materialistic lives, women will start wondering why the lights and heat aren't on and the roof is leaking and criminals own the streets.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 02:54 PM
-1

I think males just don't have the same kind sensitivity towards boundary issues. For instance, if you're not eating, try google images for "passed out drunk prank."
/r/MensRights07/12/17 02:44 PM
11

One of the more powerful women I've ever known personally said that if you don't acknowledge your support, you are in deep shit. Feminists ignore the extent to which female empowerment is supported by males like Franken, and if they alienate all their male allies, deep shit is where they will reside.
/r/MensRights07/12/17 02:43 PM
1

Perhaps they sense what that old adage says: "When you point a finger, there are three pointing back at you." "Me Too" can also be an admission of projection, of being guilty of differing kinds of abuse of power--such as characterizing a fumbled flirtation as an assault.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 09:26 AM
1

"me too" is works as an admission of projection. Given that so much of the #metoo hysteria amounts to abuse of power, this is accurate.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 09:18 AM
2

I hope his supply of male guests dries right up.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 09:05 AM
1

I hope he starts having trouble getting male guests, since he's now on record for sucker-punching them this way.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 08:50 AM
4

First, we stop giving women money. A large part of why women feel so entitled is that they represent the lion's share of retail spending and the media bends over backwards to flatter them and broadcast their complaints. Men need to stop handing money over to women.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 08:44 AM
7

They remind me of the old Communist purge show-trials, criminalizing anyone who wasn't sufficiently indoctrinated. And yes, the recent John Oliver sucker-punch of Dustin Hoffman makes me feel ill. I hope his supply of male guests dries up after this. Preening little shit.
/r/MensRights06/12/17 08:40 AM
1

I agree and do believe that the process men are going through is unlearning the social programming to be cannon fodder and to take off the provider harness to be free to express and create for themselves and other men without being stigmatized as cowardly, shiftless or, in some negative way, gay.
/r/MensRights28/11/17 01:13 PM
1

Jessica Jones, and before her Buffy, are nice examples of this. Both able to kick all the ass but somehow they're big ol victims cuz men. I've seen other good examples of this but can't remember them atm.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 06:56 PM
1

Marketing.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 06:49 PM
1

Interestingly, lesbian relationships have a higher than average domestic violence incidence.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 06:45 PM
3

Feminists are useful idiots for the elites. By alienating men of their own social class they short circuit the instinct to protect wife and family that was so effective during the labor movements of the past. After feminism, and two income earners, men had less drive to make sure they were treated fairly, since men are programmed not to fight for themselves, just others.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 06:43 PM
2

And then they wonder why men don't have instant empathy for their grievances.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 06:39 PM
2

Hogwash. First off it's been very well examined, beginning with Freud's work on sex and aggression and so on. And the idea that you can discuss one gender's sexuality without depicting it in relationship to the other is asinine. Finally, like so many other feminist clickbait articles, it assumes the feminine is the correct gender.
/r/MensRights27/11/17 06:32 PM
2

Yeah, it's called The Competence Club.
/r/PussyPassDenied23/11/17 01:58 AM
1

Heh, I just assumed that was one of the many slang words I don't know.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 04:09 AM
3

New hashtag I'm proposing for this kind of complaint: (#ohyoupoordear)
/r/MensRights21/11/17 02:49 PM
5

The foolishness of painting men as "the enemy," is the possibility that you will end up with men as your enemies; that will suck for women.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 02:49 PM
8

We'll be trashed no matter what. Might as well say what we feel even if it's harsh.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 02:39 PM
3

That's actually really good advice.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 11:01 AM
2

Oh yeah, I read recently about female suicide bombers that managed not to blow themselves up. So I guess male competence, in both constructive and destructive enterprises is preferable to female fecklessness?
/r/MensRights21/11/17 09:40 AM
1

Creep is more often than not in the opinion of the beholder. To hold someone responsible for one's own reaction when that person meant no malice is an invitation to endless mindfuckery.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 09:37 AM
1

Eight hour meals are a single man's friend. Get a crockpot and a good recipe book, and a rice steamer besides.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 09:33 AM
0

For every star that gets shot down, there are dozens to hundreds of industry support professionals who are affected. The cost is already in the millions. And the defamation suits haven't even started yet.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 09:31 AM
3

Along with the familiar jeering sarcasm about how men shouldn't complain but just accept that they're unilaterally at fault.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 09:29 AM
7

This is one of several lengthy essays I've read recently that discuss men's growing reticence to be alone with women but avoid discussing false accusations. Avoiding feminist criticism, probably.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 09:19 AM
3

It's kind of the natural response when all men are being tarred with the same brush. So the point of this is to not interrupt while we're shaming all of you.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 08:37 AM
1

Sue 'em, Charlie.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 08:35 AM
1

I can imagine the defamation lawsuits being drawn up right now. Would be interesting if it weren't so useless.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 08:35 AM
3

Franken's mistake was thinking he was dealing with a grownup.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 08:19 AM
10

If all men are trash, then no men are trash. Just men.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 09:47 AM
12

Sounds like you were responding appropriately to a douchebag move, but you think it was less appropriate because the d-bag was a woman. If you would have responded the same way to a man, then misogyny wasn't involved.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 10:24 AM
5

That's is a statement worth some fair debate. But will shouted down.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 10:15 AM
1

Using the breast cancer scam model.
/r/MensRights19/11/17 10:12 AM
4

Ripley, killing the zenomorph mother with the loader is seen as being a badass. She didn't invent, build or probably know how to maintain it. The film kills all the men and celebrates the woman using their tech like it was her own. Hollywood feminism. Same scene using magic: Molly Weasley, a powerful witch, devoted wife and mother, kills the fuck out of Bellatrix using her own power and her passion for those she loves and wants to protect. That's real feminine power, the kind feminists have talk…
/r/MensRights19/11/17 10:11 AM
6

If you live close to a city. I'm a vet, and the local clinic is good for GP and flu shots, but everything else is a 100 mile round trip..so I use medicaid-medicare.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 02:24 PM
21

Wow, I wasn't aware of the stark difference in what is provided to women and not to men in the ACA. Thanks Obama, not.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 01:56 PM
2

Textbook gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights18/11/17 09:04 AM
11

Watch "The Red Pill" by Cassie Jaye, and if possible incorporate it into your presentation.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 03:19 PM
3

Women in groups without men don't get a lot done. I've been happy to not get into harness for women for years though. The truth is that women are total noobs at politics, having only been at it for a few generations, and are hilariously unaware of how clueless they are, like most overconfident incompetent beginners.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 03:13 PM
9

The path to MRA is well trodden by former male feminists, beginning with Warren Farrell, who started out on the board of directors of NOW, and ended up seeing sense and helping so many men with their red pill process.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 03:11 PM
8

It's a huge heads up to men who consider themselves allies to feminists. No ovaries, no mercy. People are looking at masses of women wanting men's lives and careers destroyed just because of accusations and saying, "oh yeah, we need more of these in our congress and courtrooms--not."
/r/MensRights16/11/17 10:42 PM
4

And a pony.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 10:40 PM
11

And for FFS don't give 'em money. The biggest reason they're getting listened to is that they are the major retail spenders, spend emotionally, and hold a grudge forever.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 10:38 PM
3

A massive heads up to men who see themselves as allies to feminism. Under the bus in a nano-second... Better put in an extra large order for red pills this month.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 07:04 PM
2

Wow, that is the best public service burn I could ever imagine.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 02:51 PM
9

Nice point!
/r/MensRights16/11/17 02:40 PM
114

She says she misses being seen, but the stuff she talks about is not her, it's sexual sign stimulus to actually enhance her, and to give her power she doesn't naturally have. She is understanding clearly what women have to lose in a feminist world. How boring that she has to actually bring value to her interactions beyond being a bauble.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 12:38 PM
3

Since feminism has become a cultlike religion for many, some articles of faith cannot be questioned.
/r/MensRights16/11/17 04:53 AM
1

After only 2 decades they got right on this!
/r/MensRights16/11/17 03:02 AM
3

Tell people they're trash and they'll live up to your fucking expectations, you dimwit. (Edit: Referring to the article writer, not the poster.) Refuse to honor men and you'll be up to your ass in dishonorable men. That's how this planet works. Sheesh.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 12:28 PM
3

Somehow the fact of the power that women have through their natural and enhanced attractiveness gets dropped out of discussion of power in sexual situations.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 10:09 AM
7

So all those male chefs are outliers and freaks? Men don't cook and clean because they don't give a shit about those things. That's why most straight male bachelor homes are scruffy. Find a guy whose place matches your idea of cleanliness and date him. Don't expect a guy to change and get enthusiastic about chores to please you. He'll just start disliking you as well as the chores.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 10:06 AM
6

Just the implication that the rest of the house is hers.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 10:02 AM
0

"Lights out" is kind of a hard response to defend.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 05:30 PM
6

He's done well selling tickets directly online, and has the resources to record himself at some venue. The people calling for him to be strung up are ridiculously over-reacting to ride the mob for clicks and views.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 05:26 PM
2

Seems like this guy just sucked these words out of his thumb. They don't cover the territory at all.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 05:24 PM
3

My point is that a vagina is a spectacle whereas a penis is seen as an assault. It's just a dick. They didn't lose any health or mental faculties. It was obnoxious of him but way out of proportion to the towering biblical fingerpointing. It's just a dick. They were adult women. He asked first. They could have said no. He admitted it was wrong and a mistake. He apologised. They still want him to be punished with his whole reputation and career. It's weird and stupid that it's this big a deal.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 08:19 AM
4

They're seeking to make it the state religion, and courts of inquisition are part of that.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 08:02 AM
1

Most of us are raised to be possible cannon fodder, to not think of sticking up for our gender. Historically, men have been just a faceless resource to throw at industry or war to serve the rulers, and could only find any honor at home for being fathers and providers. Now of course that's largely gone, and women, being the main source of retail spending, are pandered to while men are still supposed to give themselves over to support the culture uncomplainingly. It genuinely freaks people out to …
/r/MensRights14/11/17 07:28 AM
2

It's fascinating to watch the articles claiming that he hasn't done enough and that somehow what he did was so far beyond decency--you know, doing the same thing that young girls do on cam for spending money--that he cannot be forgiven and absolutely should not have a career. I do not like this man very much but I will buy a ticket to the next concert he does, using direct over the net payments as he has successfully done in the past. People are confused about sexuality in these weird times and …
/r/MensRights14/11/17 07:22 AM
3

This woman has caused so much damage. Created a generation of useful idiots, dividing working class so that the corporatocracy could exploit everyone with ease.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 07:16 AM
5

Standard feminist accusation talking points based on their skewed version of reality.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 01:45 AM
2

I think the whole #metoo moral panic stinks so much of victimhood that I wouldn't want to be associated with it. If there were legal methods to address what happened, then I would have done that long ago. Publicly complaining just to defame is only inviting the same back to me.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 01:42 AM
3

That just gives them ammo to continue with the shushing and shaming and victimhood.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 01:30 AM
3

The goal is to divide and conquer, to keep men and women from coming together to address the real problem of depressed wages and wealth inequality.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 01:28 AM
3

It's interesting that lots of young ladies are earning spending money in their bedrooms doing on cam the exact analog of what Louis CK did with those women, but somehow he's a pig pervert degenerate.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 08:01 PM
2

Bite 'em Darla!
/r/MensRights13/11/17 07:58 PM
9

I wonder whether some western version of this will become popular as men find less rewards from work and marriage. Relative poverty and mutual support of men would be a very healthy lifestyle, perhaps combined with farming or some craft guilds.
/r/MGTOW13/11/17 01:14 PM
7

Yep. Here's a very lucid discussion of how its going and the likely destructive consequences by Karen Straughan. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w__PJ8ymliw
/r/MensRights13/11/17 11:07 AM
36

Karen Straughan produced a really good video in which she clarified why men don't stick up for themselves. They're socialized to protect women and children and to defend them from other men. Male solidarity is an uncomfortable position in response to women and even can feel unmanly and cowardly to us.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 10:46 AM
2

Nope; not sure where you got that idea. Maybe reread what I said. The feminist collected some of the dumber statements by girls wanting MRA attention. I don't agree with her, though. By being little dummies, they give feminists ammunition.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 11:06 AM
2

News flash, dumb people come in two genders. I'm not in the business of empowering women, whatever that happens to mean this week. What you propose is pandering, coddling, cossetting, flattering. All disempowering things to commit on a naive, not too bright girl looking for attention. I respect those who deserve it, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights06/09/17 09:36 AM
4

Here's a feminist who collected a bunch of them to make fun of: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=50YhygwBxgI
/r/MensRights06/09/17 06:47 AM
3

Um, have you ever seen/been someone doing a verbal book report in class with only the vaguest idea of what's in the book? It sounds like that. Also, they're made up and posing.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 01:21 PM
3

This sort of biased governance by feminists undermines all sorts of other progressive agendas and results in the election of more hardline conservatives, as we have seen here in the U.S..
/r/MensRights05/09/17 12:24 PM
5

I'm thinking of the recent flaming of Joss Whedon, who needs nothing from feminism and has all the sex he wants, but has done a lot for feminists; who have insisted on taking the side of his bitter ex-wife instead.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:50 AM
49

Whole lot of men's jobs feminists are not lobbying for, aren't there?
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:45 AM
14

That's a good point, though I have seen some girls on youtube rather cluelessly parroting MRA talking points just for the attention. Still, the truth doesn't give a shit who says it, does it?
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:24 AM
61

I think there are some awesome spokeswomen for men's rights, and can say ideas that can be heard by other women more easily than if they were said by men. We should not be like feminists and avoid torpedoing our allies from the other gender.
/r/MensRights05/09/17 04:08 AM
1

Considering that there are more women than men in the world, this is a pretty low percentage of what's been invented. Which means this is an exercise in condescending flattery.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 03:12 PM
173

Feminists are very expensive staff for universities these days.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 01:38 PM
50

Totally ignoring no-fault divorce, which is mostly initiated by women, increasing the risk of marriage for men for loss of resources and offspring.
/r/MensRights04/09/17 12:01 PM
1

Very graphic one in the original Girl With The Dragon Tattoo, but it's revenge for the same and the guy, like most in that series, is a caricature of a bad man.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 09:23 PM
2

Men's rights are not just for the brave and strong, though. They're most important when men are at risk, when they are usually ignored completely.
/r/MensRights03/09/17 02:00 AM
3

Depends on the terms of their license to to business as a VC firm, and the tax structure they're subject to, among probably other arcane elements of the biz.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 07:57 AM
2

So much of feminism is really social makeup, arranging things to show women in the most flattering light and to conceal any perceived flaws. In that way it's like a religion, chiefly to calm, soothe and console; just another social drug.
/r/MensRights02/09/17 06:15 AM
1

Also a refreshing dessert idea on these hot summer days!
/r/MensRights02/09/17 02:23 AM
2

Organizations are encountering the edge where sensitivity must give way to practicality. It’s practical to have a physically safe environment with some agreed upon standards for civility. It’s impractical to attempt to ensure that everyone “feels safe.” It’s practical to strive to make sure prejudice doesn’t keep groups from full participation. It’s impractical to hobble one or more groups because of perceived historical advantage. It’s practical to strengthen the mission of the organization by …
/r/MensRights01/09/17 03:07 PM
5

I've watched all of Girl Writes What's videos and been fascinated and engaged. For some reason, I can't sit through a single Honey Badger podcast. I guess I feel presentations and video essays are more engaging than discussions.
/r/MensRights01/09/17 03:03 PM
4

When I became an adult, I looked at fatherhood and went "nope." Fortunately I live in a time when I didn't need to join the foreign legion or a monastery. And there's porn!
/r/MensRights31/08/17 10:24 PM
1

Someone send Ronda Rousey over to get her attention.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 08:03 PM
2

I'm not sure if it's an innate thing or comes from being very protected and cared for as kids. I know that when I am in the market, very often a woman will be blocking the aisle and is completely unaware of people behind her until someone speaks up. Men seem to have some attention on the people around them; maybe this is because they've been in fights or maybe it has to do with the spacial awareness thing. Women have lived lives of much greater comparative safety than men and perhaps this is a g…
/r/MensRights31/08/17 07:35 PM
7

Zero regrets. And they think of themselves as the moral gender. Ladies, if you wonder where all the good men have gone, here's a clue for you.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 07:13 PM
248

I'm not going to jump to conclusions.....until the end of this sentence.
/r/MensRights31/08/17 07:02 PM
1

wow, it's just a picture.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 07:42 PM
19

Calling him a "little man" triggers a reduction in concern. Oh, he's just a little man. Not a child, not an infant. Little man can take it.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 09:43 AM
6

Jack up prices 15%, then, 2. Take 12% off for the ladies, who do most of the shopping anyway.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 06:45 AM
3

Yeah, cuz Sociology tries to be scientific, drawing conclusions from actual data, not cherry-picking and generating false data to fit a biased narrative.
/r/MensRights30/08/17 04:39 AM
1

I keep my account so people know I'm alive. All feeds are hidden though. If I'm interested in a particular friend, I'll check their feed. Minimal time and impact.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 02:32 PM
1

The helping hand strikes again.
/r/MensRights29/08/17 01:39 AM
2

She's just earning her pay, doing the job of imagining problems that feminist theory can supposedly fix.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 07:42 PM
1

Here's the deal: When women get in the picture in real life, things get safer and more comfortable. That's really great, but it doesn't make for compelling entertainment. That measure where two women are talking about something other than men? It can be seen anywhere in any cafe, and it's nice, but people won't buy tickets to see it.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 07:40 PM
-7

Lots of good points. Her support of Trump is indefensible no matter what her political leanings. The man has no values except self dealing. To include him in with what she supports weakens her argument, which is eloquently stated and has a lot of truth. This was done back in April. I wonder if she still supports Trump.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 02:46 PM
1

And those of us with no-good mothers? Try finding a card for a mother that isn't totally sympathetic. Can't. Lots of jokey dad's cards though.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 10:26 AM
5

So inspiring to see all those feminists out helping people to safety...oh, wait.
/r/MensRights28/08/17 09:27 AM
3

Men go on strike, and their world falls to shit.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 12:37 AM
1

That's because, like a lot of feminists of her ilk, she would rather slander men than admit how admirable the best of us are, and how much the quality of her life is due to the inventions, constructions and maintenance of men. Honor misers, and they deserve the dishonorable men they attact.
/r/MensRights26/08/17 12:35 AM
7

Henceforth to be referred to by feminists as "rape survivor."
/r/MensRights24/08/17 05:26 PM
9

Misogyny is a label that feminists stick on anything that doesn't in the moment reflect well on their pile of horseshit critique of society. The same people will be defending the same thing for a different expedient purpose the next week.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 12:35 AM
3

I'm talking about the guy who fixed the first Toy Story when it was about to be in the trash. Who made Keanu an action star when he doctored the script for Speed. Whose Firefly series was cancelled by Fox after 11 episodes and yet has a cult following over a decade later. And you can read the reviews for The Avengers yourself on Rotten Tomatoes, where it has a rare "fresh" rating, something very few action movies get. https://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/marvels_the_avengers You may dislike the man,…
/r/MensRights24/08/17 12:32 AM
0

Your opinion is yours to have. Name-calling just makes you look stupid.
/r/MensRights24/08/17 12:26 AM
19

Doing her child/ren no favors by letting her stay with them.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 06:36 PM
2

Yeah, reduce one of the most talented screenwriters and directors to a meme. To belittle is to be little is an aphorism that works for SJWs as well, though they don't get it.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 06:34 PM
4

Weapons grade bolognium, to quote the immortal Qbert J Farnsworth.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 06:28 PM
1

Heh, Firefly has a hugely devoted fanbase...and yeah, the Avengers movies, esp the first one, brilliantly stitch together the various stories to make a team...not just my opinion, but generally held among critics that he did a fantastic job with the script and direction. And you're leaving out Buffy, which actually has whole college courses built around study of the show. But you of course are entitled to your opinion.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 01:11 PM
1

http://www.businessinsider.com/joss-whedon-cowrote-toy-story-2014-9
/r/MensRights23/08/17 03:21 AM
0

http://imgur.com/nYVkqXx
/r/PussyPassDenied23/08/17 03:04 AM
1

Those vienna sausages won't wrap themselves.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 02:35 AM
16

Woman accuses rape. Woman is proved a liar. Feminists refer to her after as rape survivor.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 02:34 AM
8

Well, she's entitled to ask; but if she tears her shirt and plays victim, she's entitled to scorn as well.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 02:32 AM
1

Who somehow accidentally directed some of the highest grossing and most intelligent blockbuster movies as well as several beloved TV shows. The only people that give a shit about his shortcomings are SJW's and they don't go to Marvel movies much.
/r/MensRights23/08/17 02:23 AM
5

Also a writer for the original Toy Story (Sid was his idea) and most of the dialogue for Speed. His wife was happy to "cover for him" when he was spouting the feminist line, but last year he issued a public invitation to change the tone of blame in feminism to something more gender equal. Bad Joss, must be purged.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 07:43 PM
3

Women are the apex consumers in our culture, and the customer is always right. Stupid kneejerk feminism appeals to just the kind of uncritical target that advertisers are aiming for.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 03:16 PM
3

Even then, Ford's characters were meant to be tongue in check; and the women in those movies were mostly powerful in their own right.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 03:14 PM
8

Whedon went public to critique feminism at a conference last year. This has the exact vibe of an excommunication, including the immediate folding of the Whedonesque website. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3NLbHi7Xd8
/r/MensRights22/08/17 03:11 PM
19

These types of articles appeal to the low critical thinking women who advertisers love.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 11:07 AM
1

This is where he went off the feminist reservation. So of course he had to go. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3NLbHi7Xd8
/r/MensRights22/08/17 08:25 AM
0

A primary goal of feminism is to monkeywrench standard sex roles, as well as marriage and the family unit.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 03:35 AM
10

To get good people to do shitty things, takes religion, as they say.
/r/MensRights22/08/17 03:25 AM
19

It's pretty disgusting that someone who was proved not a victim of sexism can keep all her credibility as a spokesperson against sexism. Maybe she should get a mattress too.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 07:36 PM
2

Here's where Whedon went off the feminist reservation and set himself up for purging. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3NLbHi7Xd8
/r/MensRights21/08/17 12:17 PM
5

Ah, but a gorgeous young woman has her own power, something feminists like to skip over. A stunning young woman for a hydrocephalic balding dwarf who is a director seems like a match in power to me. Also, the girls who fucked the married man are never called to account, are they?
/r/MensRights21/08/17 12:14 PM
10

If you have a dick and associate with feminists, sooner or later they'll fuck you over. They just can't keep men as allies; it's so much more gratifying to be victims. Meanwhile, no heroine that a woman thought up has ever been as popular or had such a following as Buffy. So there's that. And his ex can dine out on pity for a few weeks.
/r/MensRights21/08/17 01:52 AM
1

Feminism has their Andrea Dworkins, and that doesn't invalidate them.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 05:15 AM
1

The only thing that covers the spectrum of men's issues and the alt-right is that they're all men who've been shamed and scapegoated. Some responses are more appropriate than others.
/r/MensRights20/08/17 12:12 AM
8

Yep...we've been in harness for always...if women want to do all the work, ok, fine. Some guaranteed income and men will just go ahead and invent the next things women will complain about being left out of.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 06:52 PM
7

In a culture that is experimenting with how to get the most out of men for the least respect and honor, deciding not to participate isn't exactly a sign of mental illness.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 05:36 PM
2

This reminds me so much of those clueless anti-drug campaigns with their lists of "street slang" to watch out for, lumping all drug users together. Stupid moral panic.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 05:32 PM
1

It's like when Cannabis was considered a gateway drug, and people were forced to hang with hard drug users to get it. We need to get MRA out of this narrative. Cassie Jaye's "The Red Pill" is a good first step.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 03:29 AM
7

This reminds me of when Cannabis was considered the gateway drug to harder stuff, and users were pushed into company with hard drug users and exposed that way. A self-fulfilling prophecy. Which is why the 60's were so threatening to the drug enforcement people, since they switched the narrative. Same thing needs to happen with MRA...out of the closet and into the streets.
/r/MensRights19/08/17 03:27 AM
8

Only way feminists can get people to spend money on 'em.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 06:36 PM
1

Of course boys can like butterflies. Who discovered and classified most of them, and published the results?
/r/MensRights18/08/17 03:23 PM
4

Always the exclusion of women from considerations of violent behavior. It's a huge falsehood, easy to expose, and yet they persist.
/r/MensRights18/08/17 04:10 AM
6

Who's gonna do the killing? Women? They'd never be effective and half of them would be hustling the men off to fuck 'em.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 07:11 PM
2

Trying to make sure everyone "feels safe" is a fool's errand and a legal liability.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 11:37 PM
2

Yeah, that useless shit that makes your life safe and clean and convenient.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 05:55 PM
6

I guess Deconstructionism didn't fuck things up quite enough...
/r/MensRights16/08/17 05:53 PM
16

And now for what men want.....crickets
/r/MensRights16/08/17 05:52 PM
4

Lost me at "whining." Fork cough.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 04:31 PM
6

Yep. In addition, it plays to the feminine impulse to hide anything unflattering, from farts to pedophilia. The position of CEO or Senator isn't so much desired for the actual work as it is because it would be a great outfit, another "look" in women's social closet.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 04:29 PM
3

If you get it that the goal is always to take the most self-flattering position, then feminism makes a kind of sense.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 01:53 PM
2

The dark shadow of feminism is the scorn and unconcern they hold for the plight of men who offer them nothing. They hiss at anything that highlights this.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 03:55 AM
17

There's always this tone of surprise that women could be vengeful and violent. They were front and center for hangings and public punishments, and major fulminators of public panic and riot.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 03:48 AM
2

Ah well, you're all set then.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 03:45 AM
3

Nah, he's got solid facts and I hope he wins some defamation money.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 09:26 PM
1

The crucial failure of having a two party system is that each has to have a big enough tent that they will include positions that are completely objectionable to a large percentage of members, thus alienating them. They either half-heartedly support their party or they go independent, currently a huge fraction of the US voting population. Better to have many parties, which have to form coalitions, but which are supported strongly by their members.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 08:12 PM
2

Do your own research. Start here: https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2017/02/15/the-stupendously-dishonest-tucker-carlson/?utm_term=.335b83c784c1
/r/MensRights15/08/17 08:09 PM
1

Some peace of mind..
/r/MensRights15/08/17 05:53 PM
0

The nastiest, most brutal fight I've ever personally witnessed--I mean teeth flying across the room-- was a gay man beating on his lover in public. Zero restraint. Still freaks me to remember it.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 05:37 PM
5

Flattering insecure women by putting men down is a major income generator for all media and those who put profit over good journalism do it every chance they get. Women do most of the retain purchasing, so getting those eyeballs of dumb and insecure women is a winner for them.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 05:27 PM
9

I'm for civil rights, good unions, responsible taxation, and a non-aggressive military stance towards the world. Like so many, I don't have a party to represent me.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 05:23 PM
-1

I know the truth doesn't care who says it, but I just can't stand this man. He's damaged so much with his bullshit.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 12:16 PM
3

Something about all this male science on which my whole life depends doesn't feel right when it concerns my beliefs: The classic fundamentalist position.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 12:12 PM
13

Without achievements, men are not sexualized in the eyes of women. That's why they do it. Women get sex whether or not they achieve anything. There are 10 Beckhams prancing around Taylor Swift on stage, and they will never be lusted after in the same way. It's admirable as hell when a beautiful woman gets great at something besides showing up.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 05:39 AM
1

That pony is out of the barn and gone, isn't it. I can't get a woman to make me a sandwich, but I can usually get a pretty competent blowjob. Let's hear it for progress.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 09:12 PM
2

Women's bodies; women's choices. Men's bodies; threatening and must be watched and controlled!
/r/MensRights14/08/17 09:10 PM
7

I learn more sitting on my ass in my bedroom on the internet in a couple evenings than I did in a month of coursework in college. We need new models of credentialing and remote course participation. Dropping your life and running up debts to be near a pile of books and getting taught by TAs is a fools game any more.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 09:06 PM
1

The Left began to lose power right around the time second wave feminism stopped supporting it.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 08:27 PM
4

Rape accusations so much of the time are a he said-she said situation. Very hard to prove without corroborating evidence, and the assaulted understand this and don't come forward. This is part of the motivation of the Title IX letter that lessened the evidence necessary to get the accused away from the university and the accuser, but that's had big problems. Most of the estimates of rape occurances are done by people who have an investment in there being a problem, and are usually inflated. Not …
/r/MensRights13/08/17 09:47 PM
1

More feminist stupidity, further alienating any possible allies among men. The world she lives in is invented, built and maintained by men, and would fall apart without them.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 06:35 PM
2

Women tend to hide their less attractive traits--from farts to alcohol and drug addiction to pedophilia--very expertly. And often they project their own ugly urges into anti-male propaganda, the way closeted gays will go after gay issues. They don't handle being pointed out for their issues. This is the energy behind the fat-shaming and slut-shaming protests. No way to hide these issues from being generally known, so they want to remove all stigma from them to ease their panic at not being the m…
/r/MensRights13/08/17 06:24 PM
3

Since men are many more times more likely to be homeless, these are the places where they can get clean and change clothes, and can occupy a bathroom for an extended period of time. My local library has a problem with the homeless doing this, but they don't lock it, because public space.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 04:19 PM
5

You can make a workplace that is physically safe and meets standards of civility. Doable. If you try to make a workplace where everyone feels safe, you've handed people of ill will a bludgeon to grab power with.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 04:05 PM
1

In addition, I'm a lifelong democrat in Northern California in a county that went 75% for Clinton. Many in the MRM are liberals.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 03:49 PM
3

Kinda hoping Peter Thiel, the guy who backed Hulk Hogan against Gawker, might sic his legal guys on Gizmodo, and maybe others, behalf of Damore.
/r/MensRights13/08/17 03:11 AM
4

And yet, my local YMCA is full of pregnant mothers, and the YWCA has no facilities, is only a feminist political unit.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 02:46 PM
1

Well, Dr. Watson, I see no sign of scat anywhere here.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 02:44 PM
15

She sits there smugly in the middle of a world and a civilization largely conceived of, built and maintained by men, and accuses them of laziness because they don't make time for the things she deems important.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 07:41 AM
5

Yeah, that'll really work as a precedent when the teacher is a male. Not.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 06:07 AM
15

Director and crew bust ass to make a cinematic masterpiece about one of the shining moments of males defending their country including its women and children. Feminists: Yeah--but. Their project is to cast males in the most unflattering light, and anything that refutes that is up for complaint.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 04:00 AM
1

That was my freakin point.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 02:59 AM
1

Traditionally, the dead one rots.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 01:10 AM
3

Google is in the business of selling ads. The majority of retail spending in the US is done by women. Customer is always right.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 11:24 PM
8

Tone of sympathy and understanding for the woman cheaters, curled lip and disapproval for the alpha male cheaters. Aimed at women, who make up the majority of retail business.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 11:22 PM
1

They go right to the gadflies and death threats to avoid the Warren Farrells and Erin Pizzis and Karen Straughans.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 10:32 PM
1

Fine, go live in caves and gather fucking berries to live on.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 08:50 PM
8

LOL, she's sitting there spouting this stuff, literally farting through silk and enjoying the safety, convenience and dependability of a world conceived, built, and maintained by men. Such bullshit.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 08:48 PM
1

Underneath all that intellectual bafflegab is a pre-adolescent experience of boys are icky. Maturity in women entails surrender and receptivity in sex, at least in heterosexual sex. There may some antagonism at the beginning, portrayed often in movies as a merry war, but eventually there needs to be a surrender on the part of a woman. Feminism covers for immature women.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 08:44 PM
5

Trying to wring justice from a person's internal emotional state is a fool's game. Sex requires a surrender at some point. This is a phobia for most feminists, so all male proceptivity looks like rape to them.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 05:51 PM
1

Stoogle.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 05:44 PM
3

MGTOWs can still contribute to society...just not as husbands or boyfriends.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 05:41 PM
1

Feminism has shamed masculinity sufficiently that only the shameproof males thrive in politics. Like overuse of pesticide or antibiotics. Trump as superbug.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 03:25 PM
1

Well, considering she was by all polls supposed to win, she really didn't. She sounded like she was running for president of women girls and LBGT's excusively.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 03:23 PM
1

Intellectual thuggery is so cute when women do it. Like sweet girls kicking homeless men with their dainty Doc Martins.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 03:22 PM
5

Throughout history large numbers of men have withdrawn from traditional roles. They were called monks. Somehow civilization thrived. Civilization that trades on the virtual slavery of one gender will not last, though.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 03:10 PM
3

Man, if he gets a lot of money, think of all the sports stars who've had their butts grabbed! A total legal ATM!
/r/MensRights11/08/17 03:03 PM
3

Feminism as vanity mirror.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 11:37 AM
2

Men should refrain from taking the shitty hard jobs as well until women are represented equally.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 02:42 AM
5

They can walk home then, and live in a cave, since men mostly conceived, invented, built and maintain the world they are safe enough to be in the streets singing, as well as the recording equipment they're using to slander with.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 02:41 AM
2

If someone is phobic about the sexuality of males in general, then any male interest looks rapey to them.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 02:38 AM
2

Speaking truth is not whining. Pointing out unfairness, injustice, slander, and systematic exclusion of one of the genders from compassionate rearing is not whining.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 01:10 AM
1

Well, lawlessness. And increased danger for women as men lose the expectation of fairness from them.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 01:08 AM
2

That's a phenomenon where when something is important to you, it gets foregrounded and you see it everywhere. There are films and TV that are less pandering, but more independent films, not studio stuff. https://tastedive.com/ Plug in a movie you like and this site will find others like it. I plugged in "Dances With Wolves," and it came up with several other good movies with strong and non-apologetic male leads.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 09:23 PM
2

There's a difference between victim blaming and victim implication. Feminists want to obfuscate any implication a woman has that contribute to the circumstances leading to an alleged sexual assault.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 08:06 PM
1

Considering that men conceived, invented, built and maintain a huge percentage of the infrastructure, technology and resources that make up that cafe, the tax should go the other way. Especially since a large percentage of what men earn goes to women, who do something like 80% of the retail spending.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 07:50 PM
1

Women, having less political power in the past, made up for it by going deep into rage, accessing their emotional power to overwhelm logic. Now that they have political power, this is very problematic.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 06:23 PM
9

She's encouraging women to do some stuff that could really blow up in their faces, legally. Also she uses the word "justice." Cue Inigo Montoya
/r/MensRights10/08/17 06:16 PM
5

It occurred to me that feminists hate the idea of false accusation because that is what holds their whole body of ideas together.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 03:10 PM
5

Men used to organize and fight, even in the face of brutal thugs, to get better pay and conditions because it was for their wives and families. They don't have that same motivation any more. Divide and conquer.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 03:09 PM
45

They still had to have a go at men for simply requesting their legal rights, as if it was some sort of character flaw.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 03:07 PM
2

Reeks of anti-male bias, and I hope she gets called out on it.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 09:14 AM
1

Doing her bit to prove that the species "asshole" has two genders.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 02:02 AM
2

Feminists are the useful idiots, and the result of pandering to women for decades since they are the apex retail spenders. Along with that is the denigration of husbands and fathers, who are more likely to refrain from impulse buying.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 03:58 PM
1

I have a guess that he was sick of the corporate culture and set a lawsuit trap for Google. He already had retained a lawyer, I read, and may even have something else lined up.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 03:49 PM
1

Well, she was a model. She might have died without new shoes daily, and they had to keep her alive for the ransom.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 01:43 PM
9

Women control around 80% of all consumer spending. The customer is always right, remember?
/r/MensRights09/08/17 01:43 PM
1

So they're averaging out all women. However all men account for less than 25% of retail spending, the rest is by women. Which means, on average, men have already paid the women more than enough and they should be treating the men, since much of the money women spend is given them by men.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 03:50 AM
2

Well, their old campaign "Look at the Dockers on that chick!" didn't go over too well.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 02:50 AM
14

Oh fuck, it's a Vogon. She's gonna read poetry!
/r/MensRights08/08/17 11:19 PM
1

Cafe, built by men, heated and lighted by the labor of men, probably building and furnishings designed by men, electronics invented by men, food largely farmed and trucked by men. And while some reduced version of the pay gap might exist, the fact is that women control +75% of retail spending. Statistically a good portion of what is spent in the cafe by women was earned by men.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 10:40 PM
1

I had the thought today that the reason feminists deny false accusation is that much of their viewpoints are based on them. So they flip tf out when their logic is scrutinized.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 10:35 PM
3

Pick your battles. See if you can get info on different professors prior to the class. Don't sportfuck.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 08:29 PM
23

Feminism: Endless new ways of saying shaddup.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 07:39 PM
12

It's not an error. It's deliberate, as is the complete dismissal of the MRM by most of these outlets every time it is discussed. Current feminism trades on false accusations and statements, and raises hell if anyone starts looking closely at them.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 07:37 PM
14

I just realized today that a possible reason feminists deny the existence of false accusations is because so much of their worldview is held together by false accusations, from patriarchy theory, the myth of "male domination" of hard sciences, to the pay gap. They are never ready for their closeup, because false accusation is the duct tape that holds their shit together.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 07:23 PM
1

Yep, total hands-off discussing the prejudices of female teaching staff.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 02:30 PM
5

Fucking hate that they call it a manifesto, as if he was the Unibomber. It was an essay.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 01:36 PM
2

You're lucky you didn't get brigaded.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 01:33 PM
3

They never said not to be dumb.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 12:48 PM
1

Here you go: https://myunion.edu/
/r/MensRights08/08/17 12:45 PM
2

I gather the tendency has been to omit the actual scientific findings and references when the media has bothered to reproduce the actual essay at all.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 11:37 AM
5

The idea that people need to drop their lives, move somewhere to be close to piles of books in an age when all the tools for learning are easily and cheaply available on the internet, is outmoded at best. The college experience, once rigorous and challenging, has become years of high priced partying and sitting hungover listening to a bored T.A. rehashing some secondhand notes while on instagram. A far more useful enterprise would be communities of online learners gathering the skills and inform…
/r/MensRights08/08/17 11:33 AM
44

Different, not inferior. By all accounts a sincere and thought out piece of writing, not an "anti-diversity screed," as it has been called. Hope it starts a real conversation, because I hate seeing dynamic economy boosting, inventive industries pussyfooting around to try to please people who will never stop finding ways to be victims.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 03:49 AM
2

Stoogle.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 03:44 AM
4

Having been married to a huge victim and false childhood abuse accuser which morphed into satanic abuse accusations when all her girlfriends decided to do it, I'm under no illusions now about the tendency to aggressively call out anyone and everyone as abusers in order to feel some kind of self worth. The Greeks understood this with the myth of Artemis, the virgin goddess, who, when a hunter accidentally wandered into her grove, turned him into a beast so his fellow hunters would kill him. There…
/r/MensRights08/08/17 12:42 AM
9

If you want allies and converts to the ideas you value, best not to start out calling them a retard. And no, I only have an MA, but I did a lot of extracurricular work in foolishness.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 10:02 PM
8

Women are the engine of retail sales and the customer is always right.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 09:04 PM
1

Not ruined...you are invited by life on a quest to find and express your authentic self. Be brave and bold, even if in tiny steps.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 06:50 PM
4

I admire Google News for putting the link to that stat right under the link to the article focusing on girl's suicides.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 06:49 PM
1

I read this as a public way to cover his ass, to avoid later finger pointing when he eventually has to hire a man to fill the position.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 02:06 PM
1

With apologies to Wm Shakespeare: The Shaming of the True.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 09:01 AM
20

Yeah, a dick can change a woman into a mother, and pregnancy changes her body forever. In the past, unwanted pregnancy could result in ostracism and even death, so yeah, virginity used to be valued. Here's the thing though: Virginity was valued in the past because it cost something: chastity. A big part of the hullabaloo over rape culture is feminists trying to re-inflate the value of the vagina even when its got a lot of miles on it.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 08:54 AM
7

As a tall white male, I've experienced expectations and invitations to take the lead that seem to be based on social norms--whether I wanted them or not. I've been made chair of a committee while I was out to the bathroom, lol. As a dedicatedly lazy person, it could be a bit irritating. I take issue with the word privilege though. Every role has its plusses and minuses. Perhaps the way has been made clear for me in some ways, but often that way involved taking more responsibility and giving up f…
/r/MensRights07/08/17 08:48 AM
2

Also the Fiomengo Files https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL9Tr55auoYdrzUqr6eiDF52ZgbcZ5KugW
/r/MensRights07/08/17 08:27 AM
3

I think it will be interesting if women are not called upon to be consumers whether they will still be pandered to the same way.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 04:29 AM
8

Again, zero mention of any liability for the woman.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 01:33 AM
8

Maybe they could consider that men built, plumbed and wired the place, built the furniture that their asses sit on, and probably farmed the food they serve.....
/r/MensRights07/08/17 01:00 AM
4

Females control 80% of the retail spending in this country. And they're easier to control/govern. http://www.realsexism.com/
/r/MensRights06/08/17 11:05 PM
3

If feminists could be treated to the sex drive of a healthy young male for a month, they would quickly get it that culture is all about preventing rape...
/r/MensRights06/08/17 04:43 PM
1

Not mentioning that male suicides are triple the rate and have been rising in the same fucking curve over the last few years! Here's the actual graph: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/66/wr/mm6630a6.htm
/r/MensRights06/08/17 04:13 AM
1

Should be interesting to see the fallout if men die because the only ambulance nearby was a pink one.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 11:16 PM
10

If a rape is unreported, where is the stat coming from? So many inflated stats about rape, there should be some definitive studies that need to be used as guidelines.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 04:30 PM
27

Textbook bigotry. If applied to any other group of people it would be glaringly obvious.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 02:17 PM
4

Lol, thousands of replies now, with example after example of false accusations and the legal punishments.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 02:06 AM
4

That's all you need to do. It's not much better in any other country; yours is better than most.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 01:48 AM
6

Yep, zero concern for falsely accused. Not even mentioned. Fortunately, the endowment departments of Universities are no longer convinced this is a good plan as the lawsuits mount up.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 01:46 AM
2

Bars charge women less to attract women who then attract men. That's smart business. This cafe will attract roomfuls of grumpy unattractive feminists.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 10:10 PM
2

They charge women more for health insurance in many cases, since women use services a lot more than men. There is a move to make charges the same for both genders, which insurers are concerned will cause men to bail on insurance. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/19/health/policy/women-still-pay-more-for-health-insurance-data-shows.html
/r/MensRights04/08/17 09:53 PM
2

So much more PC than a simple "ladies' drinks half-off," which has been around forever. It's still just marketing. They'll learn that feminists are cheapskates, though.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 03:04 PM
11

Default sexuality of females is seen as romantic. Default for males, assault. Can't tell you how many bodice ripper books were on women's desks at my last job, but a guy getting caught with a porn page open would have been canned.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 03:01 PM
1

Perhaps the endowment departments of the universities would tend to disagree, since they've become payout machines from all the falsely accused's lawsuits.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 02:58 PM
7

Even a smart person can be brainwashed.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 01:24 PM
3

Him: Let's compromise! I'll leave you and you can go to Hawaii. As Luke Skywalker, Atty at Law sez: May Divorce be with you!
/r/MensRights04/08/17 03:45 AM
25

FFS x infinity.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 02:33 AM
3

Tested. Diagnosed. Qualified psychologist. I hold a MA in educational psychology myself, and have studied the field.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 02:31 AM
2

Didn't know about that. Is this a friendly suggestion? Kinda don't think so.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 10:26 PM
13

Females in peril are guaranteed clicks/eyeballs. If they're white, that is.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 07:32 PM
2

Yeah, I was faking it when I was kicked out of school in the second grade for being retarded and spent my entire childhood in military academy, despite having a 143 IQ....fuck this guy. I used to like telling this story to my students at university.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 07:30 PM
3

The reason we constantly hear about the three main issues of women, i.e. pay, glass ceiling, and DV, is because those are the only issue where women might possibly have a disadvantage.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 05:16 PM
16

Hard to buy into seeing a woman with upper arms having the circumference of the near end of a baseball bat knocking a guy out cold. The conditioned response to seeing a woman that size in that situation is to expect her to be in deep trouble. It's better if she has superpowers, ala Buffy or Jessica Jones. But Black Widow etc. give me repetitive stress injuries from having to suspend so much disbelief.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 05:13 PM
9

The Greek myth of Artemis, the virgin warrior who turns a hunter that happens to piss her off into a stag to have his companions murder him. That's the rush of accusatory power and the self-flattery of virgin huntress that they get caught up in. Then they're so surprised when the blowback happens.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 04:51 PM
6

Just another article pandering to spinsters, keeping them in the stores spending money.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 04:32 PM
5

Well, I can't see anything much of a blowback coming from this. The malice is just dripping from this article.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 08:56 PM
6

What's never brought up is that over 75% of all consumer purchases are made by women. That means either they are robbing banks or that men are giving them a substantial portion of their earnings.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 02:39 PM
6

It's important for the lazier Western women, who are the most pampered class of people in history, to still feel that they are targets of some historical global injustice....otherwise they would be compelled to give back to others and to honor what men have given them, instead of being so breathtakingly self-centered.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 01:29 PM
57

Enjoy a good-sized dent in your endowment, USC. Cuz it's coming.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 01:17 PM
2

She's looking forward to not have to appreciate men for anything.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 04:43 AM
1

The lack of concern for men losing jobs is possibly calculated to infuriate.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 01:29 AM
42

Refuse to honor men, and you will eventually end up with only dishonorable men.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 11:18 PM
1

Well Warren Farrell was on the board of directors of NOW; Joss Whedon is not a stupid man so this might be a wake-up call for him. To be fair his mother was a feminist and raised him that way. SJW's are basically cowards choosing enemies who are the least threatening and avoiding those who are the real problem.
/r/MensRights18/06/17 07:13 PM
1

Well as they say the truth doesn't care who speaks it.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 09:10 PM
0

That was a crappy and unwise thing to say.
/r/MensRights17/06/17 06:27 PM
2

We should not rest until woman's genitals are accorded the same honor and seriousness as men's! /s
/r/MensRights17/06/17 06:00 PM
9

She managed to make all her points without saying that the film itself was well done.
/r/MensRights16/06/17 01:49 AM
2

Thinks is kind of overstating it. (⋟﹏⋞)
/r/MensRights16/06/17 01:43 AM
6

This shit really needs to stop. There is no need to invade every male-only space on earth. A male only frat house is the best way for men to avoid false assault charges as well.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 10:41 PM
3

http://she-conomy.com/report/marketing-to-women-quick-facts Interestingly, these facts never accompany the supposed wage disparity stats.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 09:08 PM
1

Yeah, cherry-pick the questions for a desired result. And actually far more men are assaulted on the street than women.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 09:03 PM
5

Yep. And when people suggest ways women could be safer, feminists often flip the fuck out, as though it was the world's responsibility to make things everywhere as safe as their bedroom. And the fact is, that most women will not put up with the risks, physical demands, and daily bullshit that men will to earn their living, but so often the feminine impulse is to avoid unflattering facts.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 08:52 PM
5

" Mothers lash out because they’re frustrated, angry and feel despair. They want the noise to stop, the pain to stop and they don’t know what to do. We are in denial and it’s harming children." Yeah, maybe a lot of the time. But sometimes they're just cruel assholes.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 08:49 PM
119

Turned off does not equal scared.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 08:23 PM
3

Well, it's a pedestal, isn't it? And the fall can be hard. Madonna/Slut split. And women know that they are no Madonnas, and are afraid that if they are not, then they're sluts, and blame society, mostly men, for their inner struggle.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 03:49 PM
26

If women hope to share political power in anything like equal measure, they need to show that they can be rational and just, something that only a minority of them do in the public sphere.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 03:34 PM
12

Before AA popularized the idea of alcoholism as a medical problem, it was seen as a moral problem and a male problem. The Women's Christian Temperance Movement was very effective at preaching this, while many of them carried bottles of potent tonics in their handbags while breaking up bars. Only when men, initially in secret (hence Anonymous) helped each other escape the shaming and doctors attested to it being a medical issue, then women came out of the cupboard, so to speak and joined. The imp…
/r/MensRights15/06/17 03:16 PM
1

One lie always leads to another. Men are not the reason they're unhappy, just a target to vent on. In fact, women who are happy and are winning are damaged much more by feminism than men.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 03:05 PM
1

This is actually a pretty wise move towards dissipating lingering prejudice towards the fraternity. Me, I'd go for blackjack and hookers!
/r/MensRights15/06/17 12:44 PM
1

How not to be body-shamed: Accept your own body and don't give others any power over that. If you like being fat, might as well be jolly.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 12:38 PM
2

Perhaps maybe finding other things to be proud of in him besides the fatness of his wallet or job title?
/r/MensRights15/06/17 12:18 PM
1

I wish they would stop referring to him as O'Queef...it's a slander to the noble queef.
/r/MensRights15/06/17 12:03 PM
1

Yeah, good guy, but they made him into an idiot-looking doofus when all the women looked like real humans. https://lumiere-a.akamaihd.net/v1/images/open-uri20150422-20810-zrf9we_f23a69b6.jpeg
/r/MensRights15/06/17 11:45 AM
2

Or find someone in town. Cue Officer and a Gentleman theme ;-)
/r/MensRights14/06/17 07:56 PM
2

Me, when I watched Brave, where literally every male character in it is a buffoon, and her little brothers are turned into animals and nobody even gave a shit. Or Wreck-it Ralph where Ralph is whacked in some way or other almost continuously and the butch soldier woman falls for the little fixit guy after he punches himself silly. And there is one female at the bad guy group... I could go on...
/r/MensRights14/06/17 07:50 PM
8

If getting people axed for perceived sexism is the only kind of power you're bringing to the table, you're not an asset.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 04:14 PM
1

Yay, party at Phi Kappa Psi, with hookers and blackjack....um, never mind.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 03:57 PM
3

Yeah, there used to be men only gyms too, called the YMCA, which is now full of pregnant mothers. And the Boy's Clubs, which are now the Boys and Girls clubs. Because a men-only organization is suspect.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 01:03 PM
1

I don't see why at this point he doesn't just haul his old butt and his money to a non-extradition country and fax everyone the finger. He's in a lose-lose situation no matter what.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 01:01 PM
3

Pick your battles, and your friends wisely. Lots of wised up women around, though they're quiet about it. Like any racket, feminism requires dupes, and like all oppressive regimes, the capitalist oligarchy is happiest when it is dividing and conquering. Learn all you can, about society and about yourself and what you truly want. Best of luck.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 12:53 PM
7

I haven't looked at or smiled at a child in so many years... The only reason I am cared for at all is that I'm a veteran.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 12:39 PM
1

From a PBS special on mental health and prison. Because the numbers were a bit lower for men, they felt free to show it as a women's problem. In state prisons, 73 percent of women and 55 of men have at least one mental health problem In federal prisons, 61 percent of women and 44 percent of men In local jails, 75 percent of women and 63 percent of men. http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/numbers-mental-illness-behind-bars/
/r/MensRights14/06/17 12:37 PM
5

I think the most powerful weapon against the abuses of feminism is women who have been harmed this way, (cf. Cassie Jaye, Girl Writes What, Christine Hoff Summers and the Honey Badgers), since feminist propaganda gives abundant excuses for tuning out the voices and concerns of men when they are expressed by men. Also, feminists getting their asses handed to them in court is a strong deterrent. http://www.charlotteobserver.com/news/local/crime/article155254404.html
/r/MensRights14/06/17 12:01 PM
3

When people pretend they don't have power, then they have no sense of the damage they can do with it. When they believe they are weak, they fuck others up with no guilt.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 11:42 AM
15

Getting a new context going in social consciousness is really difficult at first, like making a new crystalline structure in chemistry. But once it has been successfully created, it becomes easier to replicate. Interestingly, it becomes easier to replicate anywhere. The Red Pill film is a really potent map towards this new context showing up, and maybe the very potency is freaking people out. Gandhi once observed that every movement goes through four stages: First they ignore you; then they abus…
/r/MensRights14/06/17 11:36 AM
8

There should be a wiki for all of these to link to when someone starts yelling "believe her." Include all the stuff women get busted for that are attention grabbers, such as fake cancer, Munchausen's By Proxy, etc. etc. (╯°□°）╯︵ ┻━┻
/r/MensRights14/06/17 11:23 AM
5

At home or in the world, a lot of women primarily express themselves by looking for stuff to change, whether it needs to or not. It gives the illusion of importance and purpose.
/r/MensRights14/06/17 12:37 AM
2

Creativity and excellence are always the best revenge.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 09:37 PM
1

Everything in her twitter feed is directed toward women. Today is see a doctor day, and she encouraged people to do a well woman clinic. So, men, disregard this, I guess. I hope she wakes the fuck up.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 09:21 PM
14

Got a bunch of level 110 toons in WoW, friends around the world in Second Life, and a full recording studio. What you got, sonny?
/r/MensRights13/06/17 09:18 PM
1

Wreck-it Ralph, if you watch the violence absorbed by the males, as well as the hero allowing himself to stay in the bad guy role...well, I enjoyed the movie but winced a lot as well.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 07:13 PM
1

Girls buy the merchandise.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 07:12 PM
15

I also wonder how many men these days are doing a cost-benefit analysis of college and finding other ways to get education and training that doesn't leave them hamstrung financially.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 07:10 PM
1

I have a MA in Psych, have taught at the university level and have years in recovery counselling. You don't know what you're talking about. And you're wrong about the VA.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 07:08 PM
1

You think they wrap the soldiers' egos in gauze and hand them teddy bears at the VA? Taking responsibility and moving off victimhood is a powerful recovery tool. Not talking theory here. I came from a hugely traumatic childhood and was a sopping mess until I got some proper care, none of which consisted of handwringing or demonizing my caregivers. Feminism, in the area of rape, is not helping women. The primary focus is gaining power and resources by demonizing men, which is why they flip their …
/r/MensRights13/06/17 07:02 PM
16

I think any 18 year old male should be free to have it done. Otherwise, it's abusive, a bronze-age ritual holdover.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 05:40 PM
-1

I do wish Elam would tone down his shit. It gives easy ammo to people who want their prejudices confirmed.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 05:38 PM
1

Not shaming...alerting people to their own responsibility is the opposite of shaming. As for AA's track record, it's too early to say. I've only been sober for 35 years as have almost all my friends from when I started.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 05:35 PM
3

Fuck yes. In AA people would come in sniveling about how the cops were so unfair, how they got a bum rap. And they would be pulled up short with the question: "Would this have happened if you weren't fucking drunk?" And the power of answering this truthfully was that they got to get sober and not run afoul of the law. There are rapists out there. There will always be rapists unless feminism gets their wish of gelding and thinning humanity of males. Screaming victim blame and having slut walks et…
/r/MensRights13/06/17 02:54 PM
22

I notice how Gamergate keeps getting referred to as this huge ugly hate group as if that was settled fact in most media. They do the same thing with MRA. It's lazy and slanderous.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 02:46 PM
1

I don't think that it automatically makes them an innocent virgin who was snatched out of her parent's bedroom. Blame no. Implicated, fuck yes.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 02:40 PM
737

I've been around since 1946, and I don't remember Wonder Woman being a blip on the female radar until the 1960's or later. Boys bought the comics.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 02:34 PM
12

This explains the 44 point difference between the critical rating and the audience enjoyment on Rotten Tomatoes :-) (20--64)
/r/MensRights13/06/17 02:28 PM
1

Yep...the Greeks put it into the myth of Artemis, who turned the hunter into a stag so his men would kill him. And since Artemis was the virgin goddess, the buzz that comes from the accusation is this lovely illusion of purity and innocence when just a few minutes before she was barfing into her purse in the Uber.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 02:23 PM
3

Well, she would become insta-martyr, for one thing, and who knows what sort of craziness around "intimidating other victims" would ensue. Bottom line, everyone knows she's a mental basket case and nobody would come away looking good about it.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 11:59 AM
5

Well, yeah, because, uh...patriarchy.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 04:22 AM
37

Oh yeah, it's easy to know that because of all the charity events, races, pledge drives...not.
/r/MensRights13/06/17 04:20 AM
5

Men's rights, is like early, legitimate feminism, a recognition of iniquities that everyone has just accepted and a movement to raise awareness and change the social contract so males being treated unfairly are not invisible, ignored, disdained.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 02:44 PM
6

From Wikipedia: "Evander Holyfield was born on October 19, 1962, in the mill town of Atmore, Alabama. The youngest of nine children, Holyfield was much younger than his other siblings and was born from a different father.[4] Holyfield's family later moved to Atlanta where he was raised in the crime-ridden Bowen Homes Housing Projects.[5]" Sounds like his mother was the only stable parent.
/r/MensRights12/06/17 12:27 AM
1

When I was young, 50 years ago, it was easy to get a sandwich made for me, but hard to get a competent blowjob. Things have changed on that front, and one of those things is easier for me to do for myself.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 11:28 PM
7

Similar dynamic of prejudice, definitely.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 05:01 PM
21

Men need to start shooting pictures of women spreading their legs, taking up seats with their bags, etc. and getting them out there.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 05:00 PM
3

Oh, but feminism says that women don't do awful things just for the attention. Somehow her boyfriend must have manipulated her into doing this, for sure!
/r/MensRights11/06/17 10:05 AM
2

She needed a card with a higher number on it.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 06:10 AM
1

Respect is earned. I respect awesome women, tolerate basic ones, and disdain the assholes.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 06:03 AM
2

The men in those countries will not just accept foreigners coming in and unilaterally rewriting the social contract. That's delusional thinking. It's a boneheaded simplistic project.
/r/MensRights11/06/17 06:01 AM
1

Wow, what body orifice did you pull that out of?
/r/MensRights11/06/17 01:21 AM
11

Stories about women being treated unfairly are dependable click magnets.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 04:54 PM
15

Her books are incredibly well developed, intricately plotted across 7 books and with amazing character arcs. Also a lot funnier than the movies. It's just unfortunate that she's swallowed feminist kool-aid to a certain degree, because one of the things that made her books so popular was that the boys she wrote about were full of life and adventure and not at all correct. Though it seems she created them so that Hermione could scold them, maybe.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 04:51 PM
49

Well, she did say she created Hermione Granger from her own life, and I guess the tendency to be the self-righteous know-it-all remains. Insults have been gendered on both sides for centuries. Linking them to a despised political group is a slippery slope argument and a slur in its own right.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 12:52 PM
1

Ooh, a word problem! If a teacher shags 3 students and it's a second offense, but it's a female, what is the amount of time she'll serve?
/r/MensRights10/06/17 10:52 AM
6

And of course the men in those countries will just take this nicely, as foreigners come in and unilaterally rewrite their social contract.
/r/MensRights10/06/17 04:27 AM
1

Blowberta the blowbot.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 11:53 PM
1

Change happens, slowly but it happens.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 01:07 PM
1

Fame helps sell albums and movies. It doesn't help solve scientific problems. Advocating for the shallowest kind of recognition isn't wise.
/r/MensRights09/06/17 12:25 PM
4

Walmart Woman.
/r/MensRights08/06/17 12:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter