TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FortunatoFTW Archive

View 0 posts and 80 comments by FortunatoFTW on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

That shurf comes across as a politically motivated piece of shit who doesn't care about justice, just appearing "tuff on crime."
/r/MensRights17/08/14 01:22 AM
11

Um.... It's a comment on several other articles with the genders swapped. Not really something worth getting upset about- the links are at the bottom of the page.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 12:23 AM
0

I may have worked in trade fields for too long; all I could think was how obvious it was that she had no clue what she was doing with that pipe.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 11:11 PM
5

What? Link?
/r/MensRights09/08/14 10:27 PM
5

I'm not. I'm saying that her thoughts will be found as delusional the more openly she expresses them to an audience outside of the feminist one. Like I said, no one outside of the delusional wing of feminism- which is to say roughly 99% of the vocal ones- take the patriarchy nonsense seriously. I hope she keeps saying that crap openly to a larger audience. It will do more damage to her reputation than anything else.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 04:11 PM
24

Meh. It's Jessica Valenti. You can't really expect her not to say stupid shit. Thing is that she identifies herself as a moron even to the mainstream audience that otherwise tends to give feminism a pass the second that she uses the word patriarchy. I'm surprised that it took her until the fourth paragraph to use it. Nobody seriously believes that we live in a patriarchy outside of the delusional wing of feminists.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 03:22 PM
6

This is ridiculous. Hopefully she can be charged with filing a false criminal report- she needs to be punished for wasting resources on an obviously frivolous complaint.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 06:05 PM
1

Ah. Then yeah, the guys are idiots
/r/MensRights02/08/14 02:29 PM
1

I only watched the intro, but honestly if they've got the money this is probably much less risky than marriage. You don't pay an escort to have sex with you- you pay her to leave afterwards (Charlie Sheen?).
/r/MensRights02/08/14 02:42 AM
4

My thoughts on this always return to wondering why, if this is such a great idea, they aren't making this the standard for consent everywhere instead of just in college? Could it be that they don't want to have to live under this law themselves? Honestly, while I think that the dipshit senator who is pushing this bill is just a pandering fool, I don't doubt that the groups working behind the scene on this are hoping that it will further reduce male enrollment in higher education.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 03:18 PM
3

He wasn't jailed on a rape charge. He was jailed- justifiably- on the charge of official misconduct. There is nothing whatsoever in this article that indicates the city (and let's be honest, this shitbag is looking to get paid) should be named in a lawsuit. There really isn't anything in here that indicates that the intoxicated chick did not believe that she had been raped. I would have a difficult time concluding that there wasn't enough evidence to warrant an indictment and trial on the charge…
/r/MensRights01/08/14 05:21 AM
2

Wow. As shrill as that screed was I'm absolutely amazed that anyone at all pays any attention to good ol' Becky. What a moron.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 04:33 AM
6

Meh. I'd say that better advice would be to tell men to watch for any signs that the woman they're involved with believes this kind of horse shit. If she does- run. Move out of town and change your name if you have to, but the kind of creature that came up with this will never be capable of being a decent human being, let alone a life companion.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 04:18 AM
3

He might not of raped her, but he sounds like a shitbag: ...Moreno testified that he flirted and cuddled in her bed while Mata slept on the couch.....admitted he placed a phony 911 call about a sleeping vagrant to provide an excuse for one of the visits. He spent nine months in jail for official misconduct- I hardly think that qualifies as excessive. Great, you didn't rape her. You just fucked off your job and placed a fake emergency call with the apparent intention of either getting laid or set…
/r/MensRights01/08/14 01:19 AM
6

Considering the naked dishonesty in the way that she reviewed that Hitman game, I simply don't believe that she has ever even received any threats.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 07:30 PM
9

Seriously, what I find hilarious about this is the naked narcissism. Who- besides a narcissist- honestly thinks that it's cool to just go "I'm smart" (nothing to back it up) "I'm creative" (no evidence presented) etc. Let alone the completely ludicrous concept of the patriarchy attacking her at every step. I really don't understand how the people that come up with this crap aren't too embarrassed to put out there exactly how vapid their argument really is.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 04:10 PM
2

I've heard that whole argument on women being allowed to choose the father of their child based on who they want it to be even if they know that the man they choose isn't the biological father and doesn't want to be responsible for a kid, but it always read as satire to me. Anyone think this is a real thing, or that it's widespread if it is? (Outside of countries that outlaw paternity tests)
/r/MensRights31/07/14 03:10 PM
1

If you're right: 1) yeah, that's fair. 2) I've read a hell of a lot more articles from this source than I thought.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 01:15 PM
1

That was much more towards creepy than funny. They need some better writers.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 12:45 PM
2

Basically, it seems like all the criticism of him boils down to thinking that he is endorsing date rape and mild pedophilia.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 11:49 PM
3

In other words, you have no evidence to suggest that GHB being used as a date rape drug is widespread or a serious problem. If you have no statistics and no evidence that it has actually being used, I'm not sure why you're posting. The opinion of any law enforcement agency without supporting evidence is the last thing that I would trust concerning any kind of crime rate increasing; it's in their interest to keep the public scared. Since you don't appear to have any evidence beyond a few people o…
/r/MensRights30/07/14 05:06 PM
0

Not sure what your point is. Like I said, alcohol is the number one date rape drug. They didn't give any stats on how frequently anything was used, but outside of fearmongering and anecdotal accounts, I have seen nothing whatsoever to indicate that GHB has ever been widely used.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 03:02 PM
0

Your own link lists alcohol- not GHB as the most common date rape drug. Alcohol is considered the number 1 'date rape' or 'substance facilitated sexual assault' drug They only mention in passing one perpetrator who commonly used GHB to commit sexual assault- for whatever reason they didn't give a name or details, but I'm guessing it was this guy. Point is that it has happened a few times, but nowhere near enough to justify some of the hysteria surrounded by it.
/r/MensRights30/07/14 02:29 PM
2

Pretty good marketing campaign- let's not confuse the issue and pretend it's some kind of societal message or that she's breaking down barriers. One of my favorite shirts in high school was a hot pink 17th Street Surf Shop shirt, and I also had a weird looking pink patterned shirt. In no way was I breaking down barriers or any of that nonsense- this was in '84-'86. The only people deluded enough to think this is accomplishing anything are the social justice warriors.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 01:31 PM
8

Never. Our judicial system is much more emotion based than most of us realize. If you watch any of the trash TV shows like 48 hours or Dateline NBC when they follow a case (sorry if I have the names wrong- I haven't had a TV in about three years) you can't help but notice how often someone gets convicted without any real evidence. In some cases it boils down to the prosecution laying out its "theory" based on nothing more that what they perceive as a defendant having opportunity and motive. They…
/r/MensRights26/07/14 02:38 AM
4

It's pretty simple really, the patriarchy= the devil and feminism= Christianity. I haven't really worked out the entire spectrum of saints according to orthodox feminism, but I'm quite certain that Andrea Dworkin, Catherine McKinnon, Valerie Solanas, and the crazy Australian broad that thinks all women should aspire to be pedophiles are among them.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 02:26 AM
2

Wow. I'll be honest- I've never given any thought or care at all to being circumcised. Mine was done in a nice clean room by a doctor with sterile equipment and it hasn't had any effect on my sense of self at all. But that was some barbaric shit right there.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 12:47 AM
2

Best I can tell, it means that lesbians should stop sleeping with TERFs. Or maybe transwomen should stop sleeping with TERFs.... I'm pretty sure it's calling for a sexual boycott of TERFs by someone.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 02:48 PM
5

My point is that I doubt that they charge women for an entrance physical- not that I doubt they give them for free to men. If you're telling me that you know this to be true, OK, I'm guessing you know considerably more than I do on this subject. I'm going off of my experience in the military and charging potential recruits for medical services is pretty much unthinkable here.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 02:19 PM
2

Something something internalized misogyny.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 12:07 PM
16

I have a difficult time believing that women are charged for an entrance physical (I assume that's what we're talking about) and men aren't. That wouldn't seem to make any sense at all.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 12:05 PM
6

Skimming this, it didn't seem like they were so much defending her as defending their right to be outraged over everything while denying men the right to be offended by anything. It's amazing how many feminist arguments seem to boil down to "but it's different when we do it."
/r/MensRights25/07/14 08:16 AM
77

This is truly the dumbest strategy that I have ever seen among feminists; "let's feign outrage when somebody offers suggestions on how we can mitigate our risk of becoming victims. Instead, we'll pretend that simply telling criminals not to commit crimes will result in no crimes being committed." Certainly brilliant.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 12:13 AM
3

/r/thathappened
/r/MensRights23/07/14 01:57 AM
1

But..... But.... rape isn't about sex. I know because feminism says so.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 02:00 AM
3

Tumblr SJWs summed up in one cartoon.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 12:51 AM
2

Let's see..... Single eyewitness account...... stereotypically piggish behavior on the part of a dude..... No pictures...... Published on a blog that at first glance seems dedicated to bashing men..... The obviously 100% true nature of this anecdote might fit better into /r/thatHappened/
/r/MensRights17/07/14 08:05 AM
3

I certainly see the parallels; the holy writ of feminism states that women are oppressed and men have it easy. Any contradictory evidence is seen as heresy- they're still pushing the wage gap myth despite all the evidence against it. Heretics who dare suggest that the sun doesn't actually revolve around the earth are shunned and ridiculed from the safety of the echo chamber and loudly berated with quotes from the prophets. Some of them function on the same level as the Takfiri running around and…
/r/MensRights13/07/14 11:40 PM
14

I think that what he's saying is that feminism is a religion.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 05:14 PM
1

I disagree that it gives them an edge- at least outside of their own little circles.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 04:58 PM
3

I don't think that playing their version of buzzword bingo is going to help in any way. I also don't really think that too many people outside of the outrage battalions give a whole lot of credence to the whole "mansplaining" meme. Most of us just view it for what it is; an immature attempt to stifle conversation coupled with a phony word that a few idiots think sounded cute.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 04:57 PM
8

It's Buzzfeed- the only reason that they posted this is so their outrage battalion can feed on it. I got as far into the comments as the requisite "they need to educate themselves about what feminism really is" line. I think it was the second comment. I'm guessing that educating themselves means coming to understand that they really are victims of the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights12/07/14 12:28 AM
12

Reading through that.... It reads too perfectly stereotypical of tumblerina feminism. If it's real, she's an absolutely reprehensible person, but my gut says it's a troll.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 04:19 PM
3

I haven't read the book, but marriage today simply doesn't make sense for a man. It's gotten to the point where my friend's 70 year old father told me point blank that he would never advise a young man to get married today. There's no incentive to do it and a lot of incentives not to.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 02:35 PM
2

I'd highly recommend against that. Self defense isn't likely to be considered a legitimate justification if he strikes a woman; it's the way that things are in this country. Most of it anyway. Anectdotal: I had a friend in college who was married to batshit crazy. She had repeatedly attacked him for various perceived transgressions. On one occasion she jumped on his back while he was trying to leave and he flipped her. Both parties agreed that this was what happened. He still went to jail, anger…
/r/MensRights09/07/14 07:56 AM
3

You misspelled "shit."
/r/MensRights09/07/14 06:37 AM
2

Um...... Is this the nutjob that supports that whole tiered verbal consent thing? The one that claimed that being asked for a kiss really got her hot? Yeah, who cares what she thinks about anything. Also, good luck convincing anyone with an IQ above room temperature that a gendered term is actually egalitarian and in any way interested in addressing problems unique to men.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 06:36 AM
7

Once, you talked to a moron.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 07:53 AM
10

Maybe not "every 5 seconds," but affirmative tiered consent is a real thing in feminist theory among those that have never had sex with anything that didn't require batteries. To the best of my knowledge this first came up at Antioch College somewhere around 1994- and was more or less universally derided. The standard that they adopted was something to the effect of requiring verbal consent for each step further up the intimacy staircase- I actually talked to their campus attorney about this whe…
/r/MensRights30/06/14 06:47 AM
3

Sounds a lot like trolling to me.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 05:57 AM
2

Dafuq'd I just read?
/r/MensRights30/06/14 05:09 AM
6

In Britain: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/10660612/Women-are-almost-42-per-cent-more-likely-to-take-sick-days-than-men.html In the U.S. http://www.stltoday.com/lifestyles/health-med-fit/health/health-matters/u-s-workers-on-average-take-off-sick-days-a/article_83544c26-0317-11e0-9662-00127992bc8b.html It's one of those things that are for some reason believed because "everyone knows it's true." Facts don't really play a part in that narrative (like many others).
/r/MensRights29/06/14 06:37 PM
2

That made me laugh. Thanks.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 06:28 PM
5

Unless the emblem that they're using is a drunken middle aged woman trying to relive her misspent youth, I don't really see the problem. Cougar means big cat. The slang term means a female creeper. Pretty sure their helmets aren't going to depict the latter term. This may be the dumbest thing that I've ever heard in terms of catering to someone's perceived (I seriously doubt that there are actually women that would be offended by this) sensibilities.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 07:10 PM
1

Thanks. A little better, but I still don't quite have the hang of it.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 08:39 AM
1

Wow, formatting really got screwed up on that when I hit save.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 06:30 AM
5

1) from what I've seen (I'm new here) that is usually referring to what is read on feminist sites. 2) Dunno. Sorry. I doubt that demographics are readily available for what is largely an online thing. 3) I haven't seen any evidence that points to a large disparity in wages FOR THE SAME JOB. There have been numerous articles in mainstream publications debunking this- especially the 77 cent (or whatever it is these days) figure. 4) I think that it is a gross oversimplification to suggest that ther…
/r/MensRights28/06/14 06:29 AM
0

You aren't even tilting at a windmill; you're tilting at the wind. Have fun with that, I've wasted enough time on the subject.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 04:09 AM
0

False accusations... against a dead woman.... When you don't even know if they're false...... are a human rights issue... Seems legit.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 02:49 AM
2

Maybe I don't understand the point of this post; I've never heard of her before this, but my understanding is that this is a female author being accused by her own daughter. How exactly would this be a men's issue? Do I have something incorrect?
/r/MensRights28/06/14 02:20 AM
4

It's kind of weird to me that they are acting like this is needed to establish that war crimes were committed. There are videos of Iraqi Soldiers on their knees, in a line, with their hands and feet zip tied, and the murderers (who are not in frame) are calmly walking down the line and shooting them in the back of the head (I think that it was on liveleak, but couldn't swear to it). There isn't "evidence" of war crimes- there is proof. What can or should be done about it, I don't really know. I'…
/r/MensRights27/06/14 05:50 PM
4

What? If everything happened as described, I think life in prison with no possibility of parole. I don't really know why they felt the need to ensure that we knew the race of everyone involved, nor her status as a virgin though. That is, by any standard, a heinous crime.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 09:04 AM
2

On further review..... Sounds like a great way to doxx people. Get them to friend you on FB...... Whether or not you are telling the truth- which I don't know- This is a bizarre tactic. These kinds of things are better dealt with through an attorney then through a FB mudslinging festival. If you are telling the truth, you will absolutely not win in that environment. Nor are your friends in that community likely to think nothing of a bunch of new friends coming rushing to your defense. If they're…
/r/MensRights26/06/14 11:47 PM
5

This. Only this. Read nothing else and do this. Don't even finish reading this comment before you talk to a lawyer.
/r/MensRights26/06/14 11:41 PM
1

This talks about the issues with the study. There's way too much for me to try to give a tl;dr version, but the abstract sums up the ideology behind it pretty well: "Abstract: Advocacy research on sexual assault tends to inflate the scope of rape and emphasizes the perverse behavior of men. Statistics on rape are mostly exaggerated under the misguided belief that doing so would result in collective action against the assailants and, hence, mitigate the problem." http://www.d.umn.edu/cla/faculty/…
/r/MensRights25/06/14 07:37 PM
1

For more information on the dynamics and exactly how corrupted the system is, there's a movie called Divorce Corp. They sum up how messed up the system is, but make it sound like both men and women are effected equally. It was available on youtube just a couple of weeks ago, but apparently isn't any more. If you can find it, it's worth watching.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 02:13 PM
1

I think that this always comes down to conflating MGTOW, PUA, Red Pill, and MRM under the banner of mens rights in the mind of the public. I've been on one site that- by any reasonable standard- would be considered to hate women that called itself a MGTOW site (yeah, I get it NAMGTOWALT). I don't think that I ever saw women referred to as anything other than "Axe wounds" on that site. While I haven't seen anything that I would consider hatred of women on any reputable MRM site, in the mind of th…
/r/MensRights24/06/14 08:32 PM
1

I understand completely. I occasionally "grow a beard" but only when I'm in a position that allows it, and for the same reason- fuck shaving. I could let it grow out now, over the summer, but I'd have to shave it off before my first clinical in August. Mustaches, however, are allowed. I am working on an absolutely horrid display of subnasal facial hair. It looks absolutely awful in addition to being an impediment to eating soup. Which I guess is kinda the point. I've never seen facial hair as a …
/r/MensRights24/06/14 05:12 AM
1

I think that there's a difference between being concerned about men's rights and making a conscious effort to treat men and women exactly alike; we aren't alike. The vast majority of women would be horrified if I spoke to them and treated them the way that was considered normal either in the army or on a jobsite. I think that sort of thing is kinda irrelevant minutia. Nor (at least in the case of what I'm talking about) do I think it's a matter of better or worse- just different.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 01:18 AM
3

I think that was the Hofstra University rape case. I don't think that she was ever charged with anything either.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 11:39 PM
4

Becoming?
/r/MensRights23/06/14 07:17 PM
28

The whole problem with this is that sex is not sufficiently codified. Even with the whole "enthusiastic consent" standard it still boils down to one person's word against another's. This is clearly insufficient evidence to present in a court of law- and I think that we can all agree that every sexual act should be undertaken in a manner that ensures consent can be demonstrated in a courtroom. To that end, we need to get out of the dark ages notion that sex should be a spontaneous expression of "…
/r/MensRights23/06/14 05:34 PM
2

Made me laugh. There are a lot more important things to get upset about- no matter where your priorities lie.
/r/MensRights23/06/14 07:07 AM
1

If your name is on the lease, I'd suspect that you have to continue paying that amount regardless. But, yeah- like everyone else has said you should talk to a lawyer ASAP and try to set up some kind of shared custody plan.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 06:52 PM
1

Something like that. It says in the story that her (now) husband was arrested in 2012 for allegedly assaulting her before the wedding. He was released due to lack of evidence. At least she got arrested for this. Hopefully she'll also draw some real punishment, but I wouldn't bet on it.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 02:19 AM
3

If he weren't a flag officer he'd have wound up in jail. Odds are pretty good that he played some part in doling out punishment for comparable offenses by subordinates at some point in his career, very likely ending a few careers before they got started. I don't know what this has to do with men's rights, and I'd guess that if you think it somehow relates to the MRM you haven't ever served and don't know how these things are typically handled (this is not intended as an insult- just to state tha…
/r/MensRights21/06/14 06:32 PM
11

Unfortunately, in the mind of the public groups like that ARE the face of men's rights. Which I think is his point. Or you're right and it's a troll.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 05:15 PM
9

No way in hell should she have charges dropped. She should have a conviction on her record even if there is no real punishment- this chick is clearly a danger to herself and others.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 05:04 AM
15

This is a pretty poor issue to post here, IMHO. Trying to use it to illustrate any kind of point concerning men's issues seems a little silly. FFS- how do you think that most people would react to finding out you tried to convince them that you KILLED THEIR CHILD just for the lulz? It's really hard for me to believe that there isn't something seriously wrong with him- and anyone that is using this incident as an illustration of any kind of gender politics.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 04:42 AM
1

It's a little more complicated than some have stated here. The numbers are bunk, but they aren't just pulled out of someone's ass. They phrase questions in a way that are likely to elicit a desired response and based on these responses they (the "researchers") determine whether or not the answers indicate that the woman has been sexually assaulted. There's also a tendency to conflate rape and sexual assault; thus a college student getting groped by a drunken frat boy would be reported in these s…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 11:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter