TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Forward-Razzmatazz18 Archive

View 4 posts and 46 comments by Forward-Razzmatazz18 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

And what would be the course of action for convincing these institutions? And I imagine the problem/injustice solved would be discrimination/ those fields not being made for men, right? I'm just inquiring, I'm not trying to dismiss your idea, I hope it didn't come across like that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/05/23 06:43 PM
1

"Loud, strong, unfeeling, and heroic". Sounds like the expectations a soldier might go through. "Dominant", maybe not, but still.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/23 11:09 PM
6

Of course they affect everyone, but saying "primary" is kind of insane, especially with that reasoning, as I explained in my post. I mean, are men the primary victims of war? They lose their thinkers, their doers, and their self-sustainers in combat. I understand your point about practicality, but it's not necessarily impossible to demand these things. Movements also exist in Kenya, Nigeria, South Africa and India. Besides, if we focus on practicality, then what about other situations in which m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/23 10:15 PM
1

https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2022/02/08/1047588035/marital-rape-india To this day, it is legal for a man to rape his wife in India. Also, until R v R, it was legal in Britain.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/23 07:56 PM
3

I feel like it would be good to establish some international organization surrounding men's issues, or just like, a council of men. There are definitely common global issues faced by many/most men, as well as traits, personalities and habits. There are already men's advocacy organization centers in the Western world, India, and seemingly even some African countries, so maybe they could be federated.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/23 09:38 PM
1

Why did you think that? There are millions of gang members in the world(most of them men), and I imagine millions of victims(most of them men). With that big of a sample size, and given that there's also a bias in criminal court sentencing, it seems impossible for that to be a fluke.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/03/23 09:01 PM
1

Oh, jeez, I'm sorta French but I guess I mixed my e's up. Thanks.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/23 11:10 PM
1

​ Okay, much appreciated.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/23 02:01 PM
1

Do you have any ideas for how to relate words or text and court decisions with levels and types of bias? I'm unsure with this.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/23 01:28 AM
1

Fair point. I especially should've considered that noone likes jury duty. Clumsy me. But I still view it as social action(in this I mean general taking action in something that involves other people, whatever that may be), but I was thinking of voire dir, which means that only some of the randomly selected people will actually serve on a jury. A job would also be "social action" because it is in the economy, a social construct. Sorry I didn't make my definitions clear. Since I consider being on …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/02/23 12:09 AM
1

Do you have any experience coding or building a semantic web?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/23 10:31 PM
1

It's like, you get to do more things in the economy, e.g. it's easier to get a job. That's what I meant by opportunity. It could be something like male vs female jurors for example. It wouldn't be the focus though, you're right to say it's not the main application.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/23 10:29 PM
1

It would mean like being paid at least SLIGHTLY more(I know what you're thinking, but even after, there's still a small discrepancy that adds up with the other things, and just because women work less hours, doesn't necessarily mean there isn't bias, see r/economics FAQ: Gender wage gap), being given more powerful positions sometimes, and the like. Basically "more lefts, more rights". It doesn't always apply(not all men get this), but when it does, I feel it's usually in men's favor. Feel free t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/23 09:57 PM
1

Thank you.. I have the outline and think i can put in the common cultural stereotypes, but I don't know how to build a semantic web.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/02/23 09:52 PM
2

It seems she did at least provide seemingly decent strategic planning: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joan_of_Arc#Orl%C3%A9ans See siege of Orleans and Loire campaign, as well as the first paragraph of Coronation and Siege of Paris P.S. I'm not trying to defend the topic of the post, I haven't seen her be much of a feminist figure in my experience, just as a French and Catholic one and also thus (*sigh*) a Front Nationale one.
/r/MensRights29/01/23 12:03 AM
1

That wasn't the point, she says she doesn't want to hate men in the title.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/10/22 12:20 AM
3

1.4 isn't 100% more, it's 40% more.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/22 02:33 AM
1

Okay, but if someone believes in a patriarchy, even if they're wrong, and thinks that patriarchy causes these issues, that doesn't mean they don't think these issues are part of sexism against men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/22 12:55 AM
1

I don't think they'd say it's sexism against women, I think they'd say it's CAUSED by sexism against women. Which seems reasonable, although maybe not true. It being part of or caused by the patriarchy does not devalue the affect it has on men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/10/22 12:43 AM
1

Eventually, yes. I think they mean a yearly rate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/10/22 08:08 PM
1

This only works if you assume my argument isn't true. What makes someone "feminist" but the definition?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/10/22 10:34 PM
1

How did she not do research?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/10/22 12:30 AM
1

Well, maybe some of them aren't feminist groups in the first place, as the "other" feminist groups are saying.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/22 10:40 PM
-9

Well I mean, it's not always a fallacy. If I claimed to be Scottish, without any Scottish heritage, ancestors or cultural/social connection, and then voiced my opinion as a Scottish person on independence from the UK, one could quite reasonably come up to me and say "no, you're not a true Scotsman". Similarly, if someone doesn't meet the definition of a feminist, it's quite reasonable to say they aren't one, regardless if they self-describe themselves as one.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/22 08:57 PM
1

The rules prohibit harassment based on "identity OR vulnerability" not "vulnerable identity". They shouldn't have responded like that, imo.
/r/MensRights16/10/22 08:07 PM
1

One could say that this policy in Ukraine is absurd because it "sends men to war while their wives stay home in safety". I mean, they don't literally stay home, they have to flee, but I don't see this being different for men if the reverse were true.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 06:09 PM
1

I don't get periods, have generally more points to spend on my startingattributes and get other perks only men get. In exchange, I'm the onethat does most of the fighting. Okay, not getting periods is kind of a biological privilege I suppose, but a literal draft being equivalent to that? You also referred to the "other perks only men get" but which ones of those were you thinking of?
/r/MensRights15/10/22 06:07 PM
1

I mean LITERALLY the entire post is about how the reverse happens as well, and how the reverse isn't justified. And also, that's not exactly what people are advocating. People seem to want either BOTH sexes conscripted, or neither.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 06:05 PM
1

You can argue that it's not unfair because men are stronger, but if it does simply disregard the value of men, I don't think saying "so what if it's unfair" is a very good response.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 06:03 PM
6

That makes sense.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 06:01 PM
9

Are you saying this in the sense that you morally believe it, or that is the societal way of how people are valued?
/r/MensRights15/10/22 05:29 PM
1

Has Sargon of Akkad actually called Muslim men rapists? When was that?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/22 05:16 PM
1

It doesn't seem they were trying to say that the false accusation didn't matter, just trying to perhaps explain why the woman/girl cheated. It could maybe imply that Indian men are violent, though, so I sort of understand the idea of this post.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/10/22 05:15 PM
1

I wouldn't say that's unfortunate, I'd say it's only fair for a society that has multiple issues, if you want one agenda, that agenda must be one of compromise. I still think this could be a good idea though, perhaps.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 05:02 PM
1

Unless it's about the "more effective in war" part, but I don't really understand the "so what if it's not fair" part.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 04:51 PM
1

I mean, you make it sound bad(and of course people having to fight in war is always bad), but you have yet to explain how it would be worse than the reverse.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 04:50 PM
1

By that metric women who choose not to have children should have their lives valued less? ​ I specifically said "in theory, it's not about the value of the life of the woman", so no.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 04:48 PM
1

In theory, it's not about the value of the life of the woman, but the value of the life of the women and children, in theory protected mostly by the woman.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 02:16 PM
1

Yes life ISN'T necessarily fair, but almost by definition, the idea of "fairness" is that if you have the OPPORTUNITY to change it, you should.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 02:06 PM
1

I mean, the women might be privileged, but they(or at least those specific ones) aren't the ones who created the system. It's kind of like how you don't(in theory, at least) blame white people for an unfair system, even though they're the ones who benefit from it.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 01:53 PM
1

I mean, it's sexist in the sense that you're focusing on one gender, but you're not trying to DECREASE the quality of life or rights for the other gender.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 01:50 PM
1

Well, one could say that those self-described followers are not followers, as they do not fit the definition of one.
/r/MensRights15/10/22 01:49 PM
1

How come you think that ALMOST ANY crime against a woman will be classified as motivated by misogyny?
/r/MensRights15/10/22 01:43 PM
1

He had me until "men are meant to be expendable". Like, what does that mean? I kind of don't want to know.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 05:18 PM
1

Man! Thanks for bringing these issues to light. We need to seriously look at deep, institutional problems that ignore injustices. I gotta say though, I kinda respect Dr. Koss for actually holding herself accountable and answering these questions.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 12:35 PM
1

But what they're saying is that since people already protect their daughters and hold their sons accountable, we should also do the reverse, not saying that we SHOULDN'T do the former.
/r/MensRights24/07/22 11:59 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter