TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Frosty-Gate-8094 Archive

View 0 posts and 4,484 comments by Frosty-Gate-8094 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 4,484 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Probably, they (CPS) wanted to put up the child for adoption and had some suitable parents interested. So they negotiated the deal with your friend. Considering the fact that his ex-wife was unfit to get any custody, they were free to put the child for adoption. It's unlikely that they would have destroyed your friend's life. If he kept his parental rights, he would have probably needed to accept custody at some point, and pay child support to the mother, plus other expenses. It would have been …
/r/MensRights13/11/24 08:31 AM
2

4B movement, or no 4B movement, men who were not getting any sex will not get any sex anyways. As per a study, 60% men between 18-30 are sexless. Do you think any sex-strike affects them? These men are also more likely to be right-oriented. The 40% men who are getting sex, will probably get it less, but they are more likely to be liberal as you already pointed out. So, nothing of value is lost. The women who are going on sex-strike will also not be 18 year old virgins. Most of the 4B hippies wil…
/r/MensRights13/11/24 08:24 AM
7

Well then you have no right to blame men who voted for Trump either. These men chose a president who promises lower inflation, better wages, and safer borders (from where MEN come, not bears). You chose bears, so tell those bears to vote for your favourite candidate. You have no right to tell men whom to vote. Men have free will too. My vote, my choice!!!
/r/MensRights13/11/24 08:16 AM
1

There is no alternative. Marriage laws are treated as default laws.. so not even a prenup will protect you. Yes, it will give you some protection (in terms of pre-existing assets, investment, family inheritance), but in most cases default laws prevalent in your area will apply. If the woman is good, it can work out. But it has the odds of coin-toss. Many people can fake it until they get the ring. Foreign women are good in their own country. Those who approach you are clearly doing it for money/…
/r/MensRights11/03/24 10:49 AM
1

Correct. Clitoris is basically a precursor for male penis, and in a girl embryo, it remains small and underdeveloped. The female orgasm is only possible because, both penis and clitoris have same neural structures and connections. So, women basically inherit the ability to orgasm as an afterthought. The variability in orgasm is also due to variation in other genital structure. Particularly, the distance between vagina and clitoris. Technically, all women have clitoris, so all women can 'potentia…
/r/MensRights29/08/23 06:17 AM
9

I gave-up on marriage and kids almost a decade ago. And have never been happier. I do date. But i don't keep any expectations. 2 coffee dates and a dinner date that ended quickly, is something i would take as a win. The trash took itself out! I prefer my solitude. So, going for a few months without date doesn't bother me much. That's pretty much how I spent my life from 15-16 to 28 yrs. You have to make peace with that fact. People generally get hurt when they have long-term goals/expectations. …
/r/MensRights28/08/23 06:57 AM
19

Its not that women have hard time cumming. It's just that they tend to have a greater variability in their genital anatomy. That's because, evolution 'selects for' male orgasm, but female orgasm isn't necessary for pregnancy. So, over generations subtle variations begin to accumulate. This change is resisted in men, because men that can't orgasm are selected-out of the gene pool. In some species, orgasm stimulates ovulation. (In estrous cycle). But humans are primates. We have menstrual cycle. W…
/r/MensRights28/08/23 06:46 AM
30

Ejaculation is 'selected for' in males. If you don't cum, you don't ejaculate. So, you will not be able to bear any kids. (Your germline ends at that). So, over millions of years of evolution, natural selection weeds-out males that cannot ejaculate. This selective-pressure doesn't act in females. Females can get pregnant even if she doesn't cum. So, naturally there will be more variability in female orgasm. This not only applies to humans, but almost all mammalian species. Having said that, some…
/r/MensRights28/08/23 06:32 AM
1

What is your custody share? If you both share 50-50 or 30-70 custody, i don't think you are obligated to pay anything more than 10% of your take home pay. (as she also works and earns enough) If you don't have primary custody, and the support is calculated accordingly (which appears to be the case as per your numbers), then I'd advise you to stop spending money on your kid. I mean, not on things like clothes/gifts/etc, but things like daycare, insurance, other essential spendings. The CS is calc…
/r/MensRights11/08/23 07:06 AM
9

As a man who has been approached a fair number of times, I ll say women (who approach men) typically fall into one of three categories. Those who are cute/have a good game, Those who have no game/awkward/inexperienced, and Those who are creeps. I think, most men too fall in these categories. Whether a man likes a woman who is approaching him, depends on which category she falls into. Numerically speaking, most will be rejected. But unfortunately, about half of men are desperate simps who will li…
/r/MensRights11/08/23 06:53 AM
5

He made a logical decision... Even if he had fought, he wouldn't have got any custody until the protection order remained in force. (Which is indefinitely). All is not lost with the kids. He still has enough time to get their lives back on track. His youngest is only 16, how many of us really had our lives sorted at that age? Once his kids are 18+, he can still rebuild relationship with them and have a positive effect on their lives. He is already doing that with his daughter. It's easier to tak…
/r/MensRights03/07/23 10:16 AM
3

Who said i am sexless? I do get action about once a week on an average... Pretty much same as most married men. But I keep it to that-- casual.. No marriage no kids, i am very clear about that.. I don't think i m conventionally attractive, but i do give-off that 'stable guy' vibes. Mid-thirties, good job, don't smoke/drink/any other addictions, no run-ins with authorities, generally pleasant to socialize with... I don't carry a label on my head that i will never marry.. Girls who get with me, ev…
/r/MensRights17/05/23 02:09 AM
5

Ya, i was wondering the same.. How can these men be so foolish to put their passport details into birth certificate of a child he doesn't even know!!! The mother can legally claim child support from the father.... Which can easily be a few thousand pounds per month.. Not worth the risk for just 8-10k.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 02:13 PM
-4

Exactly!! This is the reason why divorce rate is >50%.. most men have no idea about women's psychology. They think they will get married and everything will be hunky-dory. But in reality, they are blindsided by divorce. And taken to cleaners in the court. That's because most men can never understand women. There is no point in trying to understand them either... Be nice to them. They aren't bad.. but don't invite a woman and govt into your personal life. (AKA marriage).. Keep that outdoors, and …
/r/MensRights16/05/23 02:03 PM
1

Doesn't really matter... Modern 21st century gives you enough 'alternatives' to physical sex.. So, men who are single aren't really missing out on anything much. Once you start getting used to that lifestyle, you don't really feel the need for a woman. Yes, they come and go.. When they are around, they are fun too.. But there is no need to marry one. Single life is bliss.. Women can have a piece of it, if they want. But they can't ask for 50% of it.. That's when i say no.
/r/MensRights16/05/23 01:57 PM
19

Women in-general do not care whether men in their 20s sexless or not.. At that age, they want to have fun, so even one willing party-boy is enough to meet their needs. Generally it's late 20s or 30s when they start getting annoyed that men are not committing or interested in serious dating.. The truth is that, men who were mostly single in their early life are now accustomed to that lifestyle. (Like you, even me for that matter). I don't resent my life though. I am grateful that i remained singl…
/r/MensRights16/05/23 08:21 AM
2

This!! Achraf Hakimi did the same by sending all this salary into mother's account. He actually won in divorce.. OP's father should do the same. Make sure that he does it sufficiently in advance (before divorce) so that he is legally in the clear.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 02:22 PM
3

I haven't been a feminist since a decade, but what changed my views is when feminists in my country opposed a gender neutral rape law. The law commission had made it more stringent but removed all the gender biased language. Feminists in my country opposed it and got the previous gender biased language back. (While conveniently keeping the other stringent provisions).. The end result is that adult men in my country can be legally raped by woman. With no legal statute to punish them. The day that…
/r/MensRights15/05/23 02:10 PM
2

My country doesn't have draft. But my advice to anyone being drafted against his will, is to turn the turret towards your own base, set it on automatic mode and hit fire.. Then run away.. They will hunt you down, but you would have been killed either ways. At least, this way your death wouldn't go to waste.
/r/MensRights15/05/23 01:56 PM
2

The incentive was that, during good and peaceful times, men would be treated better by the society. And in return, when tough time arrives, men would step-up and save the society.(even sacrificing themselves in the process.) Not all men stepped up, but generally, enough of men did. Remember that women had to sacrifice a lot to have kids and keep the society going. Men didn't have it this tough, but when bad times arrived, men had to step up. Sacrifice themselves and save enough women and childre…
/r/MensRights15/05/23 10:15 AM
5

Have you seen any Hollywood 'hero' movie lately buddy? There is not even one which portrays men are 'hero'.. In fact, the message we get is that women are equally (perhaps more) capable of being heroes.. Women are more willing than men to sacrifice themselves for society. And women are rarely bad or weak in these movies. If society wants to portray women as heroes. (And i admit it, they are really). Then let's also put those expectations on women. For once in our history, it's time for women to …
/r/MensRights15/05/23 08:35 AM
3

symptoms of a lot of systemic issues that men and boys face Of course.. so, the gender-biased rape laws also a reason for toxic masculinity? How about gender-biased domestic violence laws? And also the practice of removing the man from the shared household by police, even when there is clear evidence of wife being the perpetrator. Is the demand for misogyny being made a hate-crime (with no such demand against misandry) also an example of toxic-masculinity? Nobody is telling feminism to solve men…
/r/MensRights15/05/23 07:54 AM
1

One of major reasons women don't orgasm during sex is because of variations in anatomy... Slight variation in anatomy happens to all organs. Some have longer fingers, some have short stubby fingers. Some have larger ear lobes, some have extra fingers, etc... Some degree of variations happens among all humans.. These variations also exist in our private parts. (Genitalia). Nature tolerates minor variations as long as it doesn't interfere in the 'function' of the organ. this is where the crux lies…
/r/MensRights09/05/23 08:26 AM
4

Well said. There was another study before covid which showed that the no#1 preference of women while looking for job is 'work-life balance '. Whereas for men, it's 'monetary compensation'. Men are willing to sacrifice their personal life for higher pay. Women are less likely to be so.. This is even true for high end professionals like actors/sportspersons. That pretty much explains most of the pay-gap.
/r/MensRights07/05/23 02:32 PM
1

I do date.. but never co-workers.. I am not that attractive, so i don't really get cold-approached in the wild.. Most of the women who approach me are through friends and family circles or coworkers.. So, i guess they fairly know about my background and general social status. I don't go around rejecting everyone. I am not a jerk. But co-workers.. it's certainly a no-go. Especially when i know that i don't have a long-term plan in mind. When it eventually breaks-up.. the fallout will be unmanagea…
/r/MensRights06/05/23 05:44 PM
1

Do you believe that rapes are real too? Do you believe that 1 in 3 women experience sexual assault in their lifetime? Then you shouldn't be surprised to know that this is real too.. Most sexual assaults start pretty much this way. Now that the genders are reversed, it suddenly becomes fake. isn't it?
/r/MensRights05/05/23 04:54 PM
4

I have 3-4 coworkers who tried to flirt with me in the past but were rejected. They took it fairly well.. I think ~6/10 women usually take rejection well.. It hurts their ego alright, but most do not lash out. (I think the statistics would be similar for men too). I am 36, in a well-earning job, single, never married with no kids. So, it's fairly common for women to think that I am good catch.. Except that i would never get married. Of course, they don't know that. So when they ask (not for marr…
/r/MensRights05/05/23 04:49 PM
12

Wanted to say exactly this... The reason they shame age-gap relationships is because it deprives middle aged women from dating their choice of men... Feminism as a movement is mostly dominated by older, single women, so it makes sense why they are so against it... They don't just shame men. They shame younger women too for dating these older men. It's a type of negative-competition... I liked that you pointed out evolution. Evolution is full of such examples where organisms resort to negative-co…
/r/MensRights05/05/23 04:22 PM
3

I'm not planning on using it against her but I don't know what her strategy will be in court. My strategy is that I want the judge to know that all I want is to live my life and include my son, mum and grandparents in that life as well. No buddy.. That's the biggest mistake you will be making. A court is not a place to take moral high-ground. It's not upto you to judge what's fair or unfair. It's the duty of the judge. So, you present all the facts that you know. And also the evidence for them..…
/r/MensRights05/05/23 06:55 AM
2

Exactly... These are the same simps and incels which even feminists hate... Most guys have never experienced unwanted sexual attention and how distressing it actually is... Those guys who have got such attention and most girls (who anyways get it) can empathize with the poor boy who is the real victim here.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 06:35 AM
2

You can choose to withdraw now as well... That will not affect the custody status.. Because you already have 50-50 custody, it's unlikely that courts will change it.. unless they find something substantial. So, stick to your demands of removing all additional costs over and above child support. Your financial demands are completely reasonable. And don't worry about losing custody. You will never lose custody if you are making your CS payments on time. You can simply refuse to pay anything above …
/r/MensRights05/05/23 06:30 AM
6

I think the reason they give officially was that it will break up families... So, according their logic.. Cheating doesn't break families, But exposing the cheater breaks families. Kudos to their intellectual capacity!! That's why I made the comment about stupid decisions... The logic is as fallible as their whole society.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 05:38 AM
6

It was a rumour. That was false. There was no person who directly accused him. A bunch of bullies came together to cook up the story. Which spread within the campus... It's a clear case of ill-intentions. The school should have addressed the issue. But they only investigated the accusations and found them to be false. But didn't do anything to stop it. Or identify the miscreants.
/r/MensRights05/05/23 05:34 AM
28

Stupid decisions have even more stupid reasonings... I don't even want to know it.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 03:20 PM
24

Wanting marriage doesn't make you any more of an adult than someone not wanting marriage. Getting married is a personal choice. 'my life, my choice ' No woman is 'entitled' to marriage.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 10:19 AM
69

Actually they are illegal in France. In India, they are legal. And can be ordered if the husband produces enough proof of infidelity. Moreover, unlike in most of west, the court usually doesn't order child support if the child is proven to be non-related to husband. Although it may still depend on circumstances of divorce.
/r/MensRights04/05/23 10:01 AM
19

I don't think feminism is the 'actual' reason why marriage is in decline... Marriage was always an unfair institution to both genders, but particularly unfair towards men. And that is the case from the beginning. Yes, men used to work in the past and women did not. But the kind of work, that was worth a penny, was mostly hard labour, manual and often dangerous work. Even if women had a choice, they would not work in those jobs. Staying home and looking after kids was the 'safer' option. There we…
/r/MensRights04/05/23 09:56 AM
1

My sensible and balanced approach to life is what allowed me to question 15 years of feminist indoctrination that i faced right from elementary school. (And overcome it) You wouldn't find such approach from feminists. A gender-swapped comment on a feminist sub would have been down-voted to hell. If you don't believe me than try it yourself.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 04:42 PM
1

It was left in your work browser history. If it's shared with others, then she would have eventually found out about it anyways. It can be argued that you deliberately left it there so that she finds out. (Not the case but certainly a possibility). As far her smell and looks are concerned, it has nothing to do with sexual harrasment. As a victim of sexual assault myself, i can tell you one thing... SA/sexual harrasment are never about attraction or desire. They are about control. Yes, men are se…
/r/MensRights01/05/23 04:36 PM
11

There must be criminal liability for this . Not a mere statement. School failed to protect its student from bullying that directly contributed to his death.. Policy changes is a pure eyewash. Unless people go to jail for causing negligent deaths, nothing will change. It was a boarding school. In my country, sections of custodial death will apply in this particular case. Good enough to send the warden and principal for a few years in jail.
/r/MensRights01/05/23 02:52 PM
6

It was your work tablet. And although you claim that you used ChatGPT, its reasonable that they think you wrote it yourself. Considering how a 'spicy' story written by GPT would look like, it does qualify as sexual harrasment... Play stupid games win stupid prizes.. You'll probably escape cheap here. But remember this as a life lesson.. And if you ever consider marriage in future, then beware that the risk is half your assets and future income.. Way worse odds than what you up-against right now.…
/r/MensRights26/04/23 04:41 PM
6

Discovery of electricity and the widespread availability of cozy air-conditioned jobs.. Women have always worked throughout history. But they were less in numbers because most jobs were outdoor/risky/or hard physical labour jobs. The moment cozy jobs became available, women flocked to them in large numbers.. Even historically, women have always outnumbered men in jobs that are less physically demanding. That's where the word 'spinster' comes from.. Spinning wheel was boring, low skill and low pa…
/r/MensRights13/04/23 06:51 AM
77

One of primary reasons why single women buy more homes is that, they tend to buy smaller homes.. usually sufficient only for her and a guest may be.. (reflects in the study data too) Whereas men are expected to buy a large house, which should accommodate himself, as well as, his wife and future kids. So, men tend to delay house purchase. This also applies to single men, as they will consider the size of house with future family in mind.. Also, wife is more likely to retain the shared housed post…
/r/MensRights13/04/23 06:44 AM
3

Technically OP qualifies as transgender. Not a bigot or incel.. In case you think people changing their gender become bigots, then you are the biggest bigot in this scenario.
/r/MensRights31/03/23 07:31 AM
2

I think same happens when women get promotion. The risk of divorce increases by 50% if wife gets promotion. No such correlation exists if husband is promoted.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 08:44 AM
5

Stats about sexual assault on men isn't hidden. It's not even maintained... If a boy/man goes to file a police complaint, he is either laughed at or shooed away. (Or both).
/r/MensRights30/03/23 08:42 AM
7

They are paying attention because universities have been paying hefty compensations for students who have been falsely punished in the past... Nearly 50% decisions of these Kangaroo courts are reversed when challenged in actual courts.. It's obviously a big drain on the exchequer. And what's worse is that, the money goes to MEN. Now, the latter, is definitely a good enough reason to change the rules, isn't it?
/r/MensRights30/03/23 08:35 AM
-6

In USA, u might have to pay CS with 50-50 custody too if one spouse is earning significantly more (which seems to be the case with you.) Unlike what 'no-recognition' said, child support doesn't depend on the judge. It depends on share of custody and mutual incomes. It depends on your local laws too. So if there is no CS for 50-50 custody in your place. That's great news!
/r/MensRights25/03/23 10:50 AM
1

Since day 1...
/r/MensRights24/03/23 03:39 PM
44

All feminists. Including you, if you think you are a feminist. (You may believe in equal rights to all genders. Even I do. But, that makes you NOT a feminist. Because feminists don't believe that men should have equal rights.)
/r/MensRights23/03/23 06:15 AM
1

The world may not be fair.. but courts are supposed to be. Judiciary is one of the pillars of democracy... The courts were fair in ordering her child support... So she better pay up..
/r/MensRights23/03/23 06:11 AM
4

What is woman's responsibility then? Cooking and cleaning for him? So why didn't the court order his ex to cook and clean from him and their kid everyday? Court ordered her to pay child support. So, she better pay up. Or come back and cook and clean for them.. (I would prefer the first option. But you want traditional gender roles back.. and second one should be fair according to you.)
/r/MensRights21/03/23 09:02 AM
4

Correct.. In a lot of those 'wrong convictions', the man was often forced to confess a plea deal.. (Bryan Adams is a case-in-point). Men with fewer resources who can't afford good lawyers were naturally more affected. In other words - black men.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 06:35 AM
10

It's pretty much the same in all cultures and all periods in past.. The king was often influenced and manipulated by his queen. You can read it in folklore, ancient books and even modern historical/fantasy movies like GoT. Women have always held the soft-power in our society... For men, the competition is to reach the top position in society. For women, the competition is to be with the man who is at the top. (Or who likely reach the top in near future). Present society is set up such a way that…
/r/MensRights17/03/23 06:29 AM
1

Exactly!! What will happen is that men at the top position (top 1-3%) will try to subdue resistance from other men.. With female and some male votes in their favour, this can be easily done. Those men at the bottom will slowly get dejected and dropping out.. As the contribution from the bottom of the pyramid trickles down to low levels, the whole system will eventually collapse under its own weight. My guess is that it should take about 2-3 generations to take it's full effect.. The verdict will…
/r/MensRights16/03/23 09:44 AM
3

He has bigger things to worry about than 'dating'. His kid is no#1 out of them.. His reputation comes pretty high up there too. He didn't get anything substantial after going on those dates anyways. (Other than losing reputation). He said he paid for all dates. So, technically speaking, he isn't losing anything by not dating.. Instead, saving some money and time.. Honestly, not dating sounds like a fair deal... After all, what exactly OP is losing out on anyways?
/r/MensRights16/03/23 09:22 AM
2

Yes, it is libel.. but problem is the social media. Most of these SM, like Facebook, Twitter, you tube, etc do not take the responsibility of the content posted by individuals. So, even though OP can sue them for libel, FB will just hide behind the argument that they aren't responsible for the 'content'... In my country, the govt has passed a bill to hold all social media criminally liable for their content.. But in most of west, including US, the content of SM is at the whims of their moderator…
/r/MensRights16/03/23 09:14 AM
3

What he said is that, women go for cohabitation relationships when they are the higher earner. But if the man is the higher earner, they pressurize him for marriage... So, in both cases, (marriage or cohabitation), the relationship benefits the woman..
/r/MensRights12/03/23 05:34 PM
4

If she is unemployed, there is nothing they can do. If it was the father, they would have put him in the jail. But they won't arrest her. Only time they will go after her, if you ever apply for state welfare. In that case, they will pressurize her to pay you all dues. But I don't think you are eligible for state welfare, so no action will be taken. Dile the motion for garnishing her salary, hopefully it will pay back in future.
/r/MensRights09/03/23 06:40 AM
6

In my country there is something called as 'right to be forgotten'. Although it's not a statutory law, many judgements have been passed to erase online details of people who have been acquitted by courts in the past.. Talk to your lawyer and see if you can get your case related details erased from the public database.. I think most democratic countries will have some provisions to do so..
/r/MensRights06/03/23 08:16 AM
1

False allegations aren't treated same as sexual assault. By law. If SA was proven, the accused would have got 20 years jail time. You aren't complaining that she didn't get 20 years RI, are you? Personally, i would prefer false accusations to be treated same criminally as SA. I would have preferred if she had got 20 years in jail. But alas the law doesn't say that. So be it! For now!!!
/r/MensRights05/03/23 02:51 AM
1

You can get 50-50 custody.. And if she abuses the kids, then there is CPS. This will also give you a leverage to get 100% custody.. There is no reason to stay married to a rapist!!
/r/MensRights03/02/23 08:05 AM
18

Then they should be paid accordingly as well..
/r/MensRights03/02/23 08:02 AM
3

You dont stay in a marriage with someone who raped you... Lying about BC is considered rape in some jurisdictions.. No wonder he divorced her after such a betrayal.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 08:44 AM
4

Whats the fault of the father? Lying about BC is considered rape in some countries. Will you stay married to someone who raped you? No wonder he divorced his lying wife. Men being ordered to pay child support to their rapist isnt that uncommon. So he is still paying for her crime.
/r/MensRights01/02/23 08:42 AM
3

Tax breaks only work if your wife is SAHM or earns significantly less. For equal-earning spouses, there is actually a TAX PENALTY. But in case of SAHM/low earning wife, you will lose 50% assets and will have to pay alimony and/or child support. (even in 50-50 custody). So, whatever 'tax benefits' you earned will be lost 10-fold over in divorce. So, marrying for tax-benefits is a purely stupid choice. In both scenarios, the higher earner (read husband) ends up losing.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 08:20 AM
3

A better option is turn ur turrets towards your own military leaders. Once they realise what 'pain in the ass' draftees can be, they will automatically stop it.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 08:14 AM
5

Exactly! I live a M***W lifestyle as well. Nobody really judges you beyond a certain point. Both my sisters drop my nephews and niece to my place once in a while. And they enjoy it too. Surprisingly, both my nephews have started noticing the perks of my lifestyle and openly say that they will never have a GF/wife. (They are only 6 and 9 respectively, so it may change in the future, of course). The gist is that, M***W lifestyle is naturally attractive to men. We just dont have enough precedents t…
/r/MensRights31/01/23 07:37 AM
1

Same can be said in sports. Why women groups are demanding equal pay then? Why cant they accept that men's sports are faster, more competitive and hence attracts more viewers? Women are already there in most militaries. Nobody is questioning women's presence here. Irrespective of your personal views, you will have to fight alongside women. (including all the disadvantages you mentioned). The question is of compulsory service. If the latter is fair for men, then its certainly fair for women too.
/r/MensRights31/01/23 07:09 AM
1

All these 'disadvantages' do not stop women from demanding equal pay in sports. or in jobs. It doesnt stop the 'diversity quotas' in politics and film industry.. Why only does it matter the in military? If women can compete in sports as well as men. If women can outperform men in demanding action sequences. They can surely learn to operate weapons.. Modern weapons are mostly semiautomatic or mechanised. It doesnt require brute strength. If a woman fighter pilot can be equal to a male fighter pil…
/r/MensRights31/01/23 06:59 AM
14

Too late for it.. I think you havent got the 'gender equality memo'. There is nothing that men can do but women cant. Fighting in military is just one of those things.
/r/MensRights30/01/23 10:40 AM
6

https://m.timesofindia.com/india/activists-join-chorus-against-gender-neutral-rape-laws/articleshow/18840879.cms https://www.m.jpost.com/israel/womens-groups-cancel-law-charging-women-with-rape Tell that to these feminists..
/r/MensRights18/01/23 10:24 AM
2

I dont understand this obsession with chores. I stay alone, and will never marry or cohabitate.. Its takes hardly 2-3 hours per day, for me to cooking, cleaning, laundry and a bit of routine maintenance.. I sometimes i get comments from girls I bring home, that my wardrobe needs better organisation, kitchen sink needs more cleaning, etc. I dont bother. I stay healthy and find what i need in 2 minutes.. Do you one more thing? Despite of all the complains, they still don't mind having s*x with me.…
/r/MensRights17/01/23 10:05 AM
3

I agree with them. But the fact remains that feminism itself is responsible for lack of male role models for today's young men and boys... Feminism drove away fathers from their families. Traditionally, the 'male role model' was father (or grandfather in some cultures). Without role models, men are going astray. 'Rights without responsibility, power without accountability'.. That phrase describes feminism perfectly. This comment is another way they are shrugging-off their responsibilities.
/r/MensRights17/01/23 09:44 AM
2

The lack of male-role model is a genuine issue... But its not the responsibility of 'feminists' to define or portray what that 'role-model' should be.. There is enough misinformation in the media.. What feminists dont understand is that, a boy cannot be TOLD how his male-role-model should be... Men lead by example.. Boys see successful role-models in their life and follow them.. Actions speak louder than words. Traditionally, this role was played by the father. (Or grandfather in some cultures).…
/r/MensRights17/01/23 09:39 AM
8

MRM is way ahead in India due to two major reasons.. No. 1- Laws are extremely biased against men. Its so obvious, that it doesnt take long for an average adult man to figure out thats they are unfair. No. 2- Active involvement of women in MRM. About 30-40% MRAs in india are women. In fact, women are in top leadership position in most MRA groups in India. (Vastav foundations, SIFF, etc).
/r/MensRights16/01/23 09:30 AM
25

https://womensagenda.com.au/latest/single-child-free-women-out-earn-single-child-free-men/ Statistics say otherwise. Single childless women outearn men. The gap begins to appear after she has her first child (20% decrease in median income).
/r/MensRights09/01/23 07:22 AM
1

This is not a domestic abuse scenario.. So you are unlikely to get legal help.. You can try counselling and other stuff to gets things in order.. I agree with others that you should take a DNA test to confirm paternity and then file for 50-50 custody... Your domestic situation with your GF is unlikely to improve, but it can worsen much more... Plan for separation and an amicable co-parenting plan.. One of you might have to pay child support depending on your incomes... Thats why better confirm w…
/r/MensRights02/01/23 07:17 AM
3

Women aren't stupid.. They are smart enough, not to choose to work in jobs like powergrid, firecrew, sanitation workers, because those jobs are dangerous and filthy. In presence of men, they just tell men to do those jobs. Or shame them if they refuse. If men disappear, women will just look at each other's faces hoping to put that responsibility on some gullible female they can catch-hold of. Its not that they cant do the job. Its about who will take a bullet for good of community? Who will bell…
/r/MensRights31/12/22 12:26 PM
1

So many relationships are broken because they don’t want to be married. So many relationships get broken even after marriage (divorce-the elephant in the room again)... Relationships that are going to break up, will break up eventually anyways. Marriages just delay the inevitable, and makes it 100x costlier to break up. When you get married it eventually becomes into a relationship where it’s not just out of love but to be well, partners whether it’s in a household for children or even just busi…
/r/MensRights31/12/22 11:51 AM
0

They dont, thats why I hate feminists.. But, in principle, feminism is supposed to be about gender-equality (at least so they claim)... My stance is that, marriage is inherently an institution which relies on unequal roles of genders. So, for true gender-equality, marriage needs to go obsolete. As I said already, people will always find a way to live in harmony. Marriage or not. But that harmony will be based on equality, not gender-roles.
/r/MensRights31/12/22 11:39 AM
0

You mean, I am exactly like 'feminists' in the sense i want all genders to be treated equally? Then, of course, I am exactly like them.. The problem is that most feminists dont want men to be treated equally.. But yes, I believe in gender-equality. (Feminism or otherwise).. Feminism has nothing to do with marriage. Marriage is inherently anti-feminist. So, they have their own reasons to oppose it.. If your point is that 'marriage is bad for women too, and they should also avoid it'.. Then I abso…
/r/MensRights30/12/22 11:50 AM
1

I used the word partner for non-married buddy, and 'spouse' for married partner.. The social benefits, you mentioned, can be obtained from a good buddy or close relative. If you are married, your spouse (either gender) takes up that role. But that doesn't mean unmarried people do not have a social circle. The idea that you need a married spouse to take care of you in difficult situations, is so regressive. Like we are back into 1950s. Yes, for (some) married people their spouse is a great suppor…
/r/MensRights30/12/22 09:11 AM
2

Exactly! Dismissing one side doesnt improve the circumstances of other. That's exactly what feminism has been doing for over 100 years. Everytime there is a discussion of men's issue, you people whine that women in some war-torn countries are treated worse. I just pointed out that men in those same countries are treated ever worse.. You are complaining about girls being denied education there. I am complaining about boys being sent to war-front to take bullets.. 'Dismissing one side to improve c…
/r/MensRights30/12/22 06:02 AM
1

You mentioned advantages of having a partner... Indeed humans are social animals and having partner/social company makes us happy. No rocket science in that.. BUT where is the need that the said partner should be your married spouse? Or even of opposite gender for that matter? Your partner can be your best buddy, your parent(s), sibling, or even office colleague.. Are you so narrow minded that only a married spouse counts as 'partner' in your definition? We aren't in 1950s my friend!!!! I do not…
/r/MensRights29/12/22 09:43 AM
2

This thread is discussing about countries that try to find balance between rights of men and women.. The person who you replied to clearly mentioned the issue when you compare women rights in oppressive regimes, that men's issues are completely ignored.. Oppressive regimes are oppressive to everyone..men too. The countries where women are removed from eduction and jobs, teenage boys are used as human shields.. They don't get formal education either. They get madrassa education which is equally u…
/r/MensRights29/12/22 08:25 AM
2

There is no dilemma.. Your default position should be 'not to help'. If she needs help she will ask. Then its upto your discretion whether to help or not. Personally I ll not help unless I am asked. Or I getting paid for it. (My job for example)... If I am busy or otherwise unable to, I ll politely decline the request or suggest someone who can help. That's it! I do not owe any favours to random strangers. Overthinking it doesn't help. People will accuse you of 100 different things. Who cares? P…
/r/MensRights29/12/22 07:51 AM
2

What they did what gender-profiling. Which would led to calls off boycott if done against any other gender (except male).. Let alone gender, it would be instant 'cancel' if you replace the word gender with anything else.(religious/racial/nationality).. Being suspicious of child traffickers is a good thing. But OP didnt do anything suspicious. They 'profiled' him based on his gender alone.. If you can't understand that, why the hell are you posting on an MRA forum?
/r/MensRights29/12/22 07:43 AM
0

Women are capable of working when cozy, air-conditioned desk jobs are available.. (Which is the case in west). Most of these war-torn countries do not have organised industry. (Even if they had in past, they got destroyed in the war). Jobs there are hard physical labour jobs. Even in western countries, such jobs are manned by men 90-95% of times. Foreign investment is non-existent.. Even if women get educated there, they will be working low-paying service jobs (something the feminists complain a…
/r/MensRights28/12/22 07:56 AM
7

The conditions in those countries aren't such that jobs are cozy.. Most of the men there have to do hard physical labour or dangerous jobs to keep the roof over their head.. Staying at home and cooking/watching kids is a much safer and comfortable option. Men have to literally beg,borrow or steal to keep his family fed. And punishment for even minor crimes are way harsher.. Beheading, chopping-off limbs isn't uncommon. Yes, conditions of women in these countries is bad, no doubt. But conditions …
/r/MensRights28/12/22 07:28 AM
18

You think women's reaction to men doing 'anything' is bad? Just try doing 'nothing'... Society's reaction to men doing 'nothing' is way harsher than their reaction to men doing anything...
/r/MensRights28/12/22 07:07 AM
1

Yes exactly.. It had (and still has) immense benefits for the 'society'. Its benefits the 'society' at the expense of the individuals.. Marriage wasn't designed to benefit individuals.. Humans survived as tribes even before marriage was invented. What marriage (and religion in-general) did was to organise small tribes into a large society.. The only way this could be done is to take away individual freedom and handover the authority to a higher being (God)... Even without marriage, humanity woul…
/r/MensRights28/12/22 07:02 AM
1

Marriage isn't bad by itself.. Its the divorce that is bad.. Its just happens that marriage comes with a ~50% risk of divorce. And they are a package-deal. Marriage doesnt offer any benefit to a man, that he cant earn or get by himself.. There are easier and far less risky options to get pretty much every benefit that marriage can provide.. But if you dont marry, you can avoid divorced with 100% certainty. Thats the biggest advantage of never getting married. All the potential benefits of marria…
/r/MensRights27/12/22 09:48 AM
1

It has always been so. Thats why marriage survived for thousands of years despite of being a shitty institution. Feminists always project traditional marriage as an institution that is oppressive to women. While, that is true, it is also oppressive to men.. The idea that you can earn money, protect ur children and wife, and do some household chords (In return for steady sex, and cooking and cleansing) may sound attractive to some men.. But remember that this happened in a traditional world. Wher…
/r/MensRights27/12/22 09:35 AM
1

Exactly.. This will be a dream come true for men who get transported to the 'so called' safe place.. By the time these men return, the power grids would have shut down, water supply disrupted, transport systems would have come to a complete halt. Although hospitals will be still 'manned' (read womanned), they will soon stop functioning due to lack of electricity and water. Garbage will be all over place, sewage lines will be choked and overflowing.. The men, when they see all this, would rather …
/r/MensRights27/12/22 08:53 AM
11

She said that men will be teleported to a safe place for twenty four hrs and then return back safely to the same place.. This the approximate timeline of events that will unfurl in the intermittent period.... 00:00 hrs- men disappear and teleported to a safe place. 00:01 hrs- Women start rejoicing after initial shock subsides. They start partying, walking dogs and whatever else they claim miss doing..lol. 03:00 hrs - Power grids begin to run-out of fuel for energy. Massive country-wide powercuts…
/r/MensRights27/12/22 08:45 AM
3

Exactly!! Men are figuring out on their own with experience. (Or experience of other older men.). Humans have survived with our intellectual adaptation for million years. Scientific method is a fairly recent phenomenon. (300-400 years). But for almost our entire history, people survived with generational knowlege and shared wisdom.. People predicted seasons, animal and plant behavior, natural calamities, eclipses and even arrival of comets to surprising precision.. Figuring out that marriage is …
/r/MensRights23/12/22 06:20 AM
2

Its workplace safety an MRA issue? Especially considering over 90% workplace fatalities are male. Also, professional failure is no.2 cause of male suicide. (Second only to breakup/divorce)...
/r/MensRights22/12/22 09:06 AM
15

Its going to backfire eventually.. Its just a matter of time before a bunch of men stop getting married (or getting into serious relationship)... The present push will ensure that those men are better-off than married as well as divorced men. Once that cultural shift happens, it will be unstoppable. Men will simply emulate the more successful and happier men in the society. (That is never married, single men)... Also a lot of parents will start advising their son to avoid, or at least be extra c…
/r/MensRights22/12/22 08:52 AM
5

I had conversation with a troll a few days back on this subreddit itself.. All I did was support a guy (15) who had posted about never getting married. I supported this (the boy's) view and provided statistics about how marriage (and particularly divorse) affects men negatively... Not a single mention about women. The troll finally snapped and called me a woman-hater and incel.. I pointed out that I didnt even mention women in my whole argument, and he (the troll) is the one obsessed with women …
/r/MensRights21/12/22 02:12 AM
33

Yes, and feminism kills more people than 'incel movement'. Yet the latter is called terrorism while former is celebrated and given billions in taxpayer's money!!!
/r/MensRights21/12/22 01:59 AM
3

I am late thirties, but never got judged for being unmarried and childless.. I am very clear that I'll never get married. And often tell it early in the dating period. So may be I never reach a point where I ll be judged for my singlehood. Despite of telling this to women, you will be surprised how many women stick around for months or even years, although I dont go that far very often, hoping that I'll change my mind. Most are actually decent girls, whom I would have married if I had met them b…
/r/MensRights20/12/22 01:02 PM
3

It depends on how the genders see 'singlehood'. This is from my personal experience, as a man in mid-thirties dating casually, that women consider singlehood differently than men. A few girls have said to me that 'she is single for 6 years (<insert any reasonably large time period>) since broke up with her last serious BF'. And when I ask to clarify that she didn't date anyone, she will say that 'oh! I had many casual flings and some fun during girls night out, but nothing serious'... For a man …
/r/MensRights20/12/22 12:53 PM
15

Start refusing to do any work that is not 'officially assigned' to you. If anyone tell u to, tell them to contact your superviser. If your supervised tells you, then ask them whether its above your alloted work and will you get compensation.. Yes, they might fire you, but then they will have to find a replacement who will be ready to the amount of work you do with same pay. Highly unlikely!!
/r/MensRights20/12/22 07:09 AM
9

100% men will never stay childless. And you dont need marriage, or even stable relationships, to have babies.. Babies will be born, dont worry!
/r/MensRights19/12/22 07:41 AM
5

I mean, those who say they are anti-abortion, will change their mind in case of an unplanned pregnancy. Statistically, more women are pro-life than men.
/r/MensRights19/12/22 07:39 AM
1

Global average is ~30% for divorce. And it's brought down mainly by India which has huge population and very low divorce rates.. Its higher in developed countries vs developing countries.. (That distinction is made by UN, not me. I have no idea whats so underdeveloped about these countries). I am bringing drunken driving stats because everyone pretty much agrees that drunken driving is bad (to the point of being illegal).. Even though the risk of dying is about 0.01%... Vs 50% divorce risk. That…
/r/MensRights19/12/22 06:50 AM
14

I am an MRA and strictly against feminism, but I 100% support abortion. My only take on it is that, men should also be given similar statutory period for 'paper abortion'.. An view which maintains the gender-neutrality. Being MRA isn't synonymous with anti-abortion... As long as abortion laws are implemented in gender-neutral ways!!
/r/MensRights19/12/22 06:29 AM
5

Exactly! I was always a pro-choice (still am), but I dated a girl in my early twenties who vehemently said she is strictly against abortions.. It was a casual conversation, but it sent a chill up my spine.. From that day onwards, I was extra cautious with the birth control (an habit I still keep to-date). Everyone is against abortion, until u/or ur GF gets pregnant..!
/r/MensRights19/12/22 06:24 AM
27

Being single and content makes men happy. Being single makes women miserable.. If they actually start encouraging singlehood among men, then in a few generations, the world will be left with only single men. The govt and society knows it.. Its very difficult to convince men in face of such gaslighting. Only thing you can do is 'lead by example'. Once men see being single and childless is a viable choice, more men will follow.. Once the process starts, its unstoppable.. One man at a time!!!
/r/MensRights19/12/22 06:15 AM
0

Women? I thought we are discussing about marriage, divorce and paternity laws and how it (adversely) affects MEN. You seem to be too obsessed with women to logically discuss the topic with your reptilian braun repeatedly falling back to its primitive instincts.. Marriage is bad deal for men, regardless of how women are. But an incel like you can barely think beyond sex and women, can he?
/r/MensRights16/12/22 06:58 PM
0

Being married is sufficient to prove paternity. DNA test isn't used to rebut paternity in family court. Its only used to 'establish paternity'. Once paternity is established, it cannot be revoked. Paternity can be established by one of the several ways.. Presumptive paternity - if he was married to the mother or separated within last 300 days. He signed AoP. Played a significant role as father in child life. Adopted the child at any stage. DNA test isn't required for any of these. Once paternity…
/r/MensRights16/12/22 06:28 PM
0

No they don't. The 'best interest of the child' doctrine makes sure that the presumptive father is held responsible for CS unless the actual biological father is found. (The mother will never reveal his name, why will she?) Presumptive paternity can be revoked only if bio father is found and willing to take parental responsibility. There is 60 day window to challenge acknowledgement of paternity but its unlikely that the defrauded father would ever have enough time to file for that challenge.. T…
/r/MensRights16/12/22 06:14 PM
0

That line you are quoting applies to unmarried couples. For married couples, the proof of marriage itself is sufficient to prove paternity. Dont give half quoted lines without context.. The context is clear if you read the whole article. Once Acknowledgement of paternity is signed by the man, paternity is established. Even DNA test wont absolve him of child support. Presumption of paternity doesn't only apply to married couples. It also applies to divorced couples if child is born within 300 day…
/r/MensRights16/12/22 06:03 PM
0

https://www.findlaw.com/family/paternity/chronology-establishing-paternity.http Quote "When a child is born to a married couple, a legal presumption arises that the husband is the child's father." First line in the link I posted. You lost the challenge.. Now have some dignity and accept your failure gracefully.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 05:54 PM
-1

The legal system in general, and family law courts specifically, do not operate in the ways you conjecture. The numbers I mentioned (obtained from US law website itself), present an opposite picture to your conjecture.. Common law marriage and equitable property laws may not apply in every situation, but they do apply in enough of them.. Moreover, other laws that apply to marriage (DV laws, paternity laws, child support laws) apply to cohabitation anyways. There is no point in waiting to figure …
/r/MensRights16/12/22 05:48 PM
0

No, as per the law, having a kid makes you 'responsible' for his mother too.. In fact, the courts do not even care for the kids wellbeing. They are ok giving the custody to an abusive mother so thar they can milk the last drop child support from the father. As per the law, child support isn't even based on biological paternity. Husband is the default father of any affair baby during the marriage.. Paternity fraud is absolutely legal and even encouraged by courts.. All the more reason never to ge…
/r/MensRights16/12/22 04:17 PM
0

'common-law marriage' is indeed legal only 8 states in US. But its legal in many other countries including Canada, about half of Europe, Brazil, etc.. And as you mentioned, the 'equitable property law' applies regardless of whether common law marriage applies to you or not. So, mere cohabitation or having kids is suffient to hook a man up.. In general, the govt doesnt want to take responsibility of destitute women and bastard children. So, they will find a man (any man) to be made a scapegoat. T…
/r/MensRights16/12/22 02:21 PM
3

Divorce rate in pretty much the entire 'so-called' developed world is close to or above 50%. Only India has a rate lower than 1%. (And the most misandrist divorce laws). A few middle eastern countries come between 10-30%.. No developed country has a divorce rate less than 30%. I used US statistics because its easily available.. The road safety statistics aren't much different in other countries too. The fatality rate on autobahn (Germany) also is similar to what I mentioned. Now please dont tell…
/r/MensRights16/12/22 02:06 PM
1

Those are not blind numbers.. As per US road safety statistics, the probability of death in road traffic accidents is about 0.5 for every 1 million miles travelled. Alcohol increases the risk of accident by 4-25 times (depending on level).. Which brings it to 2-12.5 per million miles risk of dying in car accident.. Most people drive only a few miles to reach home. Let's take the average to be 10 miles.. So the risk of dying in drunken driving comes to around 0.002-0.012.5% per trip. (Way less th…
/r/MensRights16/12/22 12:05 PM
7

Its not irrational fear.. The 'fear' is absolutely real. 50% risk of divorce. 85-90% risk of losing ur assets and kids after divorce. 90% probability of paying CS after divorce... These are not negligible numbers.. Compare that to drinking and driving. The probability of meeting with an accident while drunken driving is less than 1%. But we all prohibit drunken driving. Just because some idiot reached home safe despite of drunken driving, doesn't mean its safe to drink and drive. Same goes for m…
/r/MensRights16/12/22 09:35 AM
3

Its not irrational fear.. The 'fear' is absolutely real. 50% risk of divorce. 85-90% risk of losing ur assets and kids after divorce. 90% probability of paying CS after divorce... These are not negligible numbers.. Compare that to drinking and driving. The probability of meeting with an accident while drunken driving is less than 1%. But we all prohibit drunken driving. Just because some idiot reached home safe despite of drunken driving, doesn't mean its safe to drink and drive. Same goes for m…
/r/MensRights16/12/22 09:34 AM
2

If you think false accusation is bad enough.. Just remember that 11% divorcing men admit to being falsely accused during divorce proceedings. (Usually domestic violence/cruelty/child abuse/etc)... The chances of FA are way higher in marriages. And the DV laws also apply to cohabitating couples.. So, beware of that too.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 09:30 AM
-1

There is nothing called as 'catholic marriage'. All marriages are 'legal marriages' and have legal implications.. Even a catholic marriage with no legal sanction, will be viewed as 'common-law marriage' if divorce happens. If you are catholic, you are free to practice ur religion. But if you marry, the state marriage laws apply to you regardless of ur religious stance.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 09:25 AM
1

The bio-mother might still be liable to pay child support. So, she may retain the rights if she pays up.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 10:09 AM
1

Unlikely.. Natural birth is free of cost and (relatively) risk free. There will be some high-profile couples using artificial wombs. But 99% of humanity will reproduce by conventional way. Simply due to the prohibitive costs. Artificial wombs will be a boon to single men and gay men though.. But how much affordable it is for them? Only time will tell.
/r/MensRights14/12/22 10:07 AM
2

Nice buddy.. Progress is going to be slow and steady.. Hopefully justice will prevail!!
/r/MensRights14/12/22 10:04 AM
2

Open minded women aren't 'feminists'. Trust me! I wont ever marry, but I date girls for few months to years.. Most of them do agree with MRM guess (to a limited extent at least).. These are actually the decent ones, who would be worth marrying-to... Despite of that, I dont change my views on marriage.. My decision to never marry, has nothing to do with women. Its because, I dont think I can trust the institution and its laws anymore.. I have personally realised that about 60-70% women are actual…
/r/MensRights14/12/22 10:01 AM
2

Pretty much same thing happened with religion.. It started on a good note (thousands of years ago), but some people in powerful position started abusing their powers and discriminating against others.. Eventually it got replaced by better and more accurate 'scientific method'.. Something similar is now happening to feminism (only faster)... Another point, drawing parallels between feminism as a neo-religion... Those who live by the sword, one day perish by it.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 07:08 AM
1

Which statement? The links take you to news articles from verified sources. They describe the 'ACTIONS' of feminist groups. That too, not just 'any' feminist groups. Groups that are recieving millions of dollars as funding from both pvt and govt sources. Why should I believe in the empty words of an internet nobody? I have plenty of evidence to suggest that govt approved feminists groups actually fight against gender-equality. May be you should lecture them what is 'real feminism'. (Whatever tha…
/r/MensRights12/12/22 06:34 AM
2

It wont happen that easily.. Yes, men are opting out of marriage. And the number is only increasing. BUT.. The men who stay unmarried are usually poor and working class men. Also, black men are more likely to unmarried than white men.. So, overall speaking, the men who have more money and who are in powerful position (in society) are still likely to be married men.. Men opting out will eventually bring about a social change, for sure.. Whether it will be better, or more oppressive, for men is di…
/r/MensRights09/12/22 09:10 AM
1

Look at how seriously paternity fraud is taken by the society. It would have been the same if men were the predominant (or exclusive) victims of rape.
/r/MensRights09/12/22 08:49 AM
13

It takes time. The society wont collapse in a day, or even a generation.. It will takes decades, may be even centuries, for it to happen.. The seeds that we are sowing will start bearing its fruits by the end of this century.. That if, climate change hasn't already destroyed us by then.. My main point is that, its a slow process. As more men become aware, more will walk away.. Our job is to spread awareness about laws and social situation. One man at a time!
/r/MensRights09/12/22 08:14 AM
1

Lets just keep name-calling and shaming-language aside, and talks about facts.. If you can call me asshole, I can call you an hypocrite.. 99% people who give excuse about religion, do not follow it's principles themselves. Religion doesnt just recommend 'marriage', it demands dozens of other virtues along with it. Things like purity, virginity, devotion towards ur spouse, faithfulness, duty, and many more.. People who give excuse of religion for justifying marriage, do not even posses half of th…
/r/MensRights09/12/22 08:01 AM
1

I said feminists do not fight for gender-neutral rape laws. I have no idea whether you are feminist or not, or what you support. Ur personal views aren't the views of feminists in-general. These are couple of examples, to back my statement. I bet you will plenty more evidence if you dig up! https://m.jpost.com/israel/womens-groups-cancel-law-charging-women-with-rape/amp https://m.timesofindia.com/india/activists-join-chorus-against-gender-neutral-rape-laws/articleshow/18840879.cm's
/r/MensRights09/12/22 07:43 AM
1

Value, by definitions, is attained by consistency.. The $100 bill you carry in your pocket, wont have any value if there is no consistency in what people agree its value is.. The only reason the bill has value is because, anybody who sees the bill, instantly agrees that it has a value of $100. The same applies to marriage. It indeed has legal value, because everyone pretty much agrees what that 'legal value' is.. Religious value, is pretty much non-existent. Just because someone says he/she valu…
/r/MensRights06/12/22 07:56 AM
1

Co-operation between sexes implies going black to 'traditional roles'. Not getting married doesnt mean you dont engage with other people (of either gender) in a co-operative manners. You do co-operate with people of all genders. Co-operation between people is gender-neutral term. 'Cooperation between sexes' is inherently a gendered term. Which implies traditional gender roles will be played. No matter how those roles are shared, the man always gets the shorter end of the stick. You can co-operat…
/r/MensRights06/12/22 07:25 AM
0

Tell the feminists in your country to fight for a gender neutral rape law. May be you might change your mind what 'equality' means for them.. (And as far as I know, feminism fights for 'equity' not equality. The two terms aren't exactly the same)
/r/MensRights06/12/22 07:07 AM
6

Who wants traditional roles? I am happy that today, as a man, I dont have to slave out myself to take care of wife and kids. I cannot be forced to fight a war I never signed up for. I am not expected to put my life in danger for other women if I choose not to. Life as a man is way better than it was 100 years ago. All you need to do is make sure, that your dont sign any one-sided contract with the govt (AKA marriage) or do anything that put you into common law marriage.. If you are single, child…
/r/MensRights06/12/22 07:04 AM
1

People only care about 'legal aspect' of marriage because that is only aspect that is enforceable.. 'The wrath of God if they broke the vows' never became a reality. (And honestly it never was). People who cheat, abandon their kids, and commit paternity, fraud are rewarded with child support and alimony.. If this is how 'wrath of God' starts getting manifested, then it was just a matter of time before people lost faith in marriage. Its not just about hedonistic pleasure. Its about simple concept…
/r/MensRights06/12/22 06:58 AM
1

Well its pretty easy to know what the courts will do in any divorce situation, because the laws are pretty well defined. You can just google ur local marriage/community laws to get a fair idea.. Of course, your lawyer might find a loophole around some of them, but so can her lawyer. But laws remain pretty stable, and easy to interpret if you read them.. As far as religious value of marriage is concerned, then sorry to say, but marriage indeed has no value.. In fact, in my another comment on this…
/r/MensRights06/12/22 06:46 AM
1

I think some women do make it clear very early.. As early as second/third date. But most of them stay hoping that 'you will change ur mind'. I do make it clear that I dont believe in the institution of marriage.. But I find that most women stick around. They either think I ll change my mind or Men actually not wanting marriage aren't that common. So, when women do encounter such men, they have a hard time believing that he 'actually doesnt want marriage'. Some take it personally thinking that yo…
/r/MensRights05/12/22 09:44 AM
2

Marriage has no spiritual or religious value.. The only value it has is 'LEGAL'. If your wife cheats on you and has an affair baby. And you go to jesus, (or any other god that you worship), and tell him to punish her, will your God do it? But if the husband abandons the same wife and the baby (who is not biologically his), the wife can still go to the court. And guess what the courts will do? They will give the house to the wife, and order the husband to pay her alimony and (guess what) child su…
/r/MensRights05/12/22 09:32 AM
2

Marriage was never a religious, sacred, spiritual experience in its original form. Marriage evolved in different human societies, at different times, and independently. The main purpose of marriage was parental responsibility (specifically paternity) and handing over of inheritance and legacy. Without marriage, men will have sex with any random woman who is willing, and abandon the kids.. If this is allowed to happen, the society/tribe will be doon become full of bastard fatherless children.. (I…
/r/MensRights05/12/22 09:21 AM
2

My point was that, the 'higher divorce rates in younger people' line is often sold as a selling-point to younger people so as to encourage casual-relationships in younger people.. While its true that getting married too early is bad. But waiting too long doesnt fare any better.. In order to marry in that 'sweet-spot', you need to marry by 27-28.. Which means you need to zero-in on your potential spouse at least by 23-24 (assuming a couple of years of dating and 1 year of engagement).. Its not th…
/r/MensRights04/12/22 01:45 PM
1

Divorce doesnt make you unclean or immoral.. What it does is that, it comes with a huge monetary penalty. The penalty often applies to both partners, but numbers suggest that men are often harder hit financially than women. Second drawback of divorce is losing kids.. (You cannot divide them 50-50).... Again, men are likely to lose custody in 80% cases, and pay CS support in 85-90% cases.. Divorce isn't a big issue, if the divorce rates are low.. But they are a whopping 50% at present. Thats larg…
/r/MensRights03/12/22 11:10 AM
1

let's only look at fail states and make our life decisions based on that. Looking at failures and learning our lessons from it is basic human nature. The first 10 rocket launches were spectacular failures.. But if we hadn't learnt from them, we would have never reached the moon. Looking at failures doesnt make you a foolish. Average people learn from successes. Smart people learn from failures. many, many, many wildly successful and upliftingly fulfilling relationships or even the ones that didn…
/r/MensRights02/12/22 10:33 AM
1

Who talks about marriage on the date buddy? (Unless you want to scare your date away). I dont want marriage, but I takes weeks or months to actually say that in dating.. I do give subtle hints early on like saying 'I have no plans of settling down/will move to new city if I get a job opportunity/etc'. But explicitly saying 'I'll never marry' comes later in relationship.. Surprisingly, most women stay hoping that 'I will change my mind'. Its only years later when you want to move on or refuse to …
/r/MensRights02/12/22 09:42 AM
2

'Young marriage are more likely to end in divorce' is a half-lie/half truth. The real data suggests that the lowest divorce rates occurs when people marry between 25-30 years.. The divorce rates start increasing as you move to either side of this sweet spot. So, divorce rates do not decrease for first marriages, the older you get.. They decrease upto a certain age and then start to rise again. So, experience doesn't make you a better partner.. People in their 40s have higher divorce rate ls than…
/r/MensRights02/12/22 09:22 AM
3

That depends on the time when you are born. Buying the milk in a supermarket and storing it in refrigerator is pretty easy today. But if you were born in 19th century, then it would have been much cheaper to own and maintain a cow than buying milk.. Even if you could afford to buy milk, there is no guarantee it will remain fresh until you get back home from the market on foot/bullock-cart. Thats exactly the issue with marriage.. Its not whether marriage is useful or not.. The main point is that,…
/r/MensRights02/12/22 09:13 AM
1

The clear aggressor in pretty much all wars are men. That is the exact point I was trying to make here. If you see from the aggressor's perspective, he/she will be able to justify the war.. Most of wars in human history have been fought over territorial or humanitarian reasons. There is always an aggressor, but the aggressor (in his version) is trying to right an actual/percieved wrong. If both parties come to an amicable solution then wars wont exist. Will you give-up a portion of the territory…
/r/MensRights02/12/22 08:56 AM
0

More people going to fertility clinic may be down to the fact that human fertility, in general, is on a decline.. Male sperm count has fallen by 53% in last 50 years.. More and more women are having kids into their late 30s and 40s.. Its pretty obvious why more people need fertility therapy nowadays.. That has nothing to do with more people wanting kids..
/r/MensRights02/12/22 08:40 AM
1

You dont need to have an accurate view of women to get to his conclusion. You just need an accurate view of laws and family courts as they stand presently... The latter is very easy to achieve. Just log into the official govt website for marriage and custody laws and go through some prominent judgments of last few years.. Do it yourself, and tell me what picture it paints in your mind. (For bonus info, you can go through the data of divorces, percentage share of custody, and alimony/child suppor…
/r/MensRights02/12/22 08:28 AM
1

The sub getting banned didnt reduce the number of men that dont want to marry/or have kids. In fact, as per this study, its doubling and tripling... MGTOW was never a movement or a subreddit.. Its an idea every man is born with. Its the society that forces and culturally programmes men into marriage.. And it makes sense, why society does so. Because the societies that couldn't achive that, have long gone extinct!!
/r/MensRights02/12/22 08:19 AM
21

who causes those wars Thats the most stupid question.. Wars never have a single cause or person tp be blamed. Most wars are multifactorial, and both parties will often be able justify their position. Take the ukraine-russia war for example. Ukraine will say they are not to be blamed, as Russia attacked crimea and ukrainians are just defending themselves. Russia will say that crimea was their integral part, which was forcefully taken away due to NATO interference and soviet division. NATO will al…
/r/MensRights21/11/22 09:23 AM
24

100% men will never go MGTOW.. In fact, I ll consider it a win, if even 10% men in the world do... Thats far from mutually assured destruction. 90% of men are more than sufficient to sustain humanity. MGTOW is about saving yourself from gynocentric laws. By not getting entangled into them (aka never marry/cohabitate/have kids). Humanity will move-on.. If anything, it may force our society to change some of the gynocentric laws, but its highly unlikely. In most likely scenario, society will simpl…
/r/MensRights02/11/22 09:15 PM
1

Then why are divorce rates higher for second marriage? If the man cannot learn from his first marriage, what chances are there that he will learn it the first time?
/r/MensRights28/10/22 05:49 PM
2

You dont have to pity them. They aren't losing anything... Neil Armstrong doesnt pity other human beings because they never got a chance to land on the moon.. You can be happy even if you never land on the moon.. That doesn't mean landing on the moon is a bad choice.. But choosing a different career path is not a bad choice either.. You are happy with your life. And they (including me) are happy with their lives. To each his own.. You dont need to pity anybody.. But i still pity those 50% of the…
/r/MensRights28/10/22 05:37 PM
1

Somebody has made a comparison to Russian Roulette. Even if u have 5 empty chambers and 83% chance of success, its still not 'worth the risk'. The 1/6 chance of being shot with a bullet is good enough deterrence for prevent any sane person from choosing to play the game. Even if prize money is millions of dollars. In case of marriage, the chances of failure are much higher (close to 50%). And potential benefits are nowhere near a million dollars. Yes there are good women out there, (just like em…
/r/MensRights28/10/22 05:32 PM
1

Yes, and biologically speaking the role of males is to donate sperms (DNA)... It doesnt really matter how that sperm is donated. So, a man doesnt need to marry or have kids to pass his DNA. He can just donate his sperms. Or find a girl who is ready to have his kids regardless of commitment. (43% babies born out-of-wedlock in USA now).. So, there are plenty of men passing their DNA and having kids. Dont worry, our species wont go extinct.. Its only that men will find better and better ways to hav…
/r/MensRights28/10/22 05:13 PM
1

Essentially the reason they censor and ban M***W. The equivalent of women refusing to have kids is men reding marriage and LTR. If women try to do the former, they will be treated the same they are treating men that stand for the 'bachelor movement'.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 04:23 PM
1

I already pointed out that people can fake their behavior until they get what they want. If truly there are some predefined 'subtle signs' then they would be known to women too. (Including those women who want to fake it). How will you catch a woman who is deliberately faking those signs? The present divorce rate is ~50%. So, its safe to presume that nearly 50% men never learn those 'subtle signs' that you are referring to. And divorce rates for second and third marriages is even higher. So, its…
/r/MensRights23/10/22 06:09 PM
1

Needles cant fake their appearance. Humans can fake their behavior until they get what they want. (Marriage in this case). After that... the real personality of the person becomes clear. But its too late as now the daddy govt is involved. So, doesnt matter who is the 'liar' in this case. The law is only in the favour of the wife. (Of course you can divorce them. But not without 50% assets penalty.) Human personality can also change over years. Or get influenced by various factors that i have alr…
/r/MensRights22/10/22 08:35 AM
6

Daughter is definitely at fault here. More than anyone else. Being under fear and lying is one thing, but she had plenty of opportunities to tell the truth. She should have spoken up when her step brother was being arrested. 'I was too afraid' isn't a valid excuse for the damage she has done. It was not simply 'an innocent lie'.
/r/MensRights21/10/22 10:45 AM
1

I think you missed the zeist of my comment. I'll repeat, marriage is a contract between 'three' parties, not two parties.. Govt being the third and most powerful party, will invariably dictate the terms and conditions of marriage. I agree that partner's upbringing is important... But there are more things than just parents, that influences a person's life. Teachers (particularly feminists teachers), media, govt policies, legal counsellors. You cant control every aspect of marriage. Moreover, mar…
/r/MensRights21/10/22 08:28 AM
2

Yes you are a team indeed. But a team with 3 parties, not two. With govt being the third and most powerful party in the deal (AKA marriage). And we all know whose side govt and family courts take in case of a marital dispute. May be you got lucky and got a good wife. But i bet it took you several years (post-marriage) to figure out that she is a god wife. There are plenty of women who fake it until they get 'the ring'. After that the law gets involved. Even if she didn't fake it, she can still g…
/r/MensRights19/10/22 03:51 PM
2

Ya, its 39% in some studies. But that number comes from short period studies.. (Generally 5 years). About 29% first marriages end by 5th year. The rest of the number is a projection of this data... The actual number of first marriages that end by 20th year, is about 48-52%. And if you include more years, the figure will go even higher. According US data, the average duration of marriage in USA is 8 years. Long term follow up studies aren't that common. So, you can interpret the data the way you …
/r/MensRights18/10/22 05:42 PM
2

I am atheist. But I am surprised at how well-designed this situation appears to be. Humans are the biggest threat to this planet's biosphere today. We are using too much energy, and spewing out too much waste (CO2 and other compounds) that we will soon damage the ecosystem beyond repair. Nature had to get rid of humans in some way..(to protect the biosphere). But we have surpassed most of the ways nature could do that task too. Disease? -- almost impossible. Even a pandemic will not eliminate hu…
/r/MensRights18/10/22 05:17 PM
29

This is a warning to all men who are reading this. If a stranger woman offers you 'free sex', then be highly suspicious. Honey-trapping and extortion are the likely motive. And if they get caught, they will spin it against you. Not all police officers will be as impartial as these ones!
/r/MensRights18/09/22 04:30 PM
1

I agree with the first part. (I am an atheist so second part is irrelevant to me). It true that nature drugs both men and women to stay together and raise kids. That's the whole purpose of romance. The problem is that the society (both religion and law) expect people to stay together for life and take care of each other. And when that doesn't happen (because-nature) the society gets the law involved and punishes the man. Probably because it doesnt want to take care of destitute ladies and bastar…
/r/MensRights06/09/22 07:14 AM
1

In Canada you are considered 'default married' (common law marriage) even if you cohabit for 6 months.. https://www.nationalpost.com/news/canada/no-home-or-kids-together-but-couple-still-spouses-appeal-court-rules/wcm/90a5dbfd-f0f9-4690-8525-e5e3205f50a6/amp/ This man had to pay 50k/month alimony to woman he didn't even cohabit with. That's the law buddy. You are too naive to understand the consequences. i will gladly provide for her if she ever needs a break from her job or something Of course …
/r/MensRights06/09/22 07:06 AM
12

The classic giveaway -You both are 20 years old. At that age she isn't looking for a 'provider'. She is looking to have fun. Your relationship will be all 'rosy' till the fun lasts. When she gets older, or the hormone rush ends, the reality will dawn. Its too early to call it a 'great relationship'. Most of the horror divorce stories you read here, start-off at wonderful relationships too. Its the end result (divorce) that is horrible. And nobody here complains about bad women. There are bad wom…
/r/MensRights02/09/22 04:12 PM
14

Spot on! The 'greater number of men are single' data comes from narrowing down the study population. (Typically they hide the fact that its greater number of men in a particular age group. 18-35 or 20-40, etc) Overall, greater number of adult women are single than men. This makes logical sense too, as there are more women than men in most countries. And most studies confirm that men are more likely to be 'voluntarily single' than women. Even among younger age groups. The most common reason for s…
/r/MensRights13/08/22 02:45 PM
1

No, the law punishes people who do illegal things, not unethical things. Exactly... The laws themselves are biased.. That's why men need to protect themselves from biased laws. Paternity fraud- absolutely legal. F on M - legal unless there is penetration. Parental alienation - legal. False allegations - legal and encouraged. These are a few 'unethical' things done exclusively (or predominantly) by women. But can have devastating effect on a mans life, career, family, finances, mental wellbeing a…
/r/MensRights27/07/22 06:22 AM
1

In india you cant be kept in police custody for more than 14 days. (Usually its only 2-3 days until bail hearing). Once the accused is brought for courts appearance, he is usually sent to judicial custody (if bail is denied). Police need to give substantial reasons to keep his ongoing-custody. (Judicial custody is same as jail. But police has no access to interrogate the accused without court's permission).
/r/MensRights19/07/22 06:55 AM
1

~61%. 20% are kids.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 06:51 AM
2

https://policyadvice.net/insurance/insights/homelessness-statistics/ 0.17% of us population is homeless. 61% are boys and men. 20% are children.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 06:51 AM
11

Both women and men, in general, can be untrustworthy. But the law punishes only men who do unethical things. Women get a free pass. Its not about hating women. Its about protecting yourself from anti-male biased laws.. That's why this forum exists. That's what trolls like you don't want to accept.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 06:35 AM
6

What's so ridiculous about it? In which world is it mandatory to have dinners with stranger women to make profit in your business? It may apply to certain media or celebrity level jobs. But for most white collar jobs, deals can be done just fine with zoom meetings, corporate presentations and business meetings (which are attended by your whole team).. Rarely you need one-on-one dinners or lunches to seal deals.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 06:32 AM
3

Doesn't matter. Remember that for women, 'attention' is what is 'porn' to men. It doesn't matter whether you have GF or not, doesn't matter whether she finds you attractive or not, what matters is that she enjoys the 'attention'. You probably didn't mean it in a sexual way, but she 'perceived' it that way, because 'that's what she wanted'. She retorted because its her way of rationalising it. (Either she finds you unattractive or because you are 'unavailable'). If she found you attractive and yo…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 06:20 AM
1

Actually Canada has a law protecting gender identity. One of the trolls had posted in a reply to my comment. https://www.canada.ca/en/department-justice/news/2016/05/gender-identity-and-gender-expression.html So, the employer can certainly be sued under this law.. I think your friend has a good chance if getting a hefty compensation.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 07:21 AM
6

Instead of challenging it in court, better option is to not support the laws until it has gender-neutral wordings and provisions. Proposed laws can and do undergo ammendment before being voted for. Its better to demand a gender-neutral law from the onset, instead of supporting an biased law in the hope of making it neutral later on.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 07:14 AM
4

I have said it before and will say it again. Conscription laws are OUTDATED. They come from the mediaeval gunpowder era, where you can just give a gun in the hands of an rookie citizen and he could effective fight at the level of an elite longbowman/archer. The initial guns were just aim-and-hit type and had a range similar to a longbowman. But needed far less training and expertise. So, you could just draft any rookie.. But todays warfare has become highly modernized and sophisticated. Militari…
/r/MensRights18/07/22 07:05 AM
8

Rape is 'sex without consent'. So if a woman drugs a man and then rides his c**k (most men get spontaneous erections in sleep), then it will not qualify as 'rape' as per the legal definition. Even though in every sense, it is rape. In rapes where man is the victim, this is the commonest form of rape. 1 in 6 men and 1 in 4 woman report being sexually abused at some point in their life. Usually by a relative or partner. This definition virtually rules out 98% F on M rapes. It does pick up M on M r…
/r/MensRights18/07/22 06:51 AM
2

Isn't the issue of 'violence against women' a feminist issue? Then why you have a problem when MRAs raise the issue of 'violence against men'?
/r/MensRights11/07/22 04:30 AM
19

I wouldn't be surprised to see them acting violently against men too. Especially against young boys, who may not be able to defend against an adult femcel.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 09:46 AM
27

If they were lesbian, why would they be celibate? (They can just ask each other out) Its a group of women who self-identify as femcels. (Female-incels i suppose)
/r/MensRights08/07/22 09:37 AM
4

Next time video record it and file for divorce. Go for full custody giving the excuse that 'she is abusive and a danger to the child'. Yes, go full nuclear.... You may not succeed in getting full custody, but with overwhelming evidence, she will force to mediate. You have a good chance of getting at least 50-50 custody... You can try and salvage the marriage. But keep evidence. And speak up about this abuse in therapy/counselling that the courts will inevitably order... Your priority now should …
/r/MensRights07/07/22 03:24 PM
6

He was talking about masturbation you troll! Uncircumcised men can masturbate with hand alone. Circumcised men need hand+lubricant. (Sometimes additional tools depending on nerve damage and scar tissue)
/r/MensRights07/07/22 09:05 AM
1

Ya.. That's how equality looks like to men.. Being told we have all rights and, at the same time, denied basic human rights like gender neutral rape and DV laws and bodily autonomy. Its obvious why some MRAs are happy about it.. I certainly agree that this is not the kind of 'equality' we wanted. But its equality nevertheless. This gives us the opportunity to sit down and debate 'equality' so that next time we fight for equal rights.. We do so for everybody regardless of their gender. (Or we hav…
/r/MensRights07/07/22 05:32 AM
1

Attractive women are the ones who are more willing for casual sex. (This is from my personal experience so it may be biased).... If she isn't interested, then walk away... If you ask 10 of them, at least one will say yes. (Now, she probably has said yes to 10 other guys too. But why are you bothered? Its all about casual sex after all.) As i said, walking away is the key. It gives you the opportunity to try it on next girl. If you get stuck to one girl, you will have limited options..
/r/PurplePillDebate07/07/22 05:10 AM
10

Its not that men are keeping their mouth shut... A lot of them do speak up. But they are silenced by the society (and often by other men). They often use coercive methods to silence you like violence, threats, shaming tactics and sometimes false allegations. One of the reason MRM has come into prominence in recent times is because a lot of women are now speaking up. And some of them are in high enough positions to oppose the 'coercive' lobby. Yes, the same freedom of women, that feminists fought…
/r/MensRights07/07/22 04:37 AM
7

But the rich kid (women) has been blaming the poor kid (men) for decades and calling them oppressors.. The right that was taken away from women, is a right men never had. (And still don't.) Does it make them equal? Certainly yes. Is this the equality MRAs wanted? No. The truth is, the rich kid is still blaming the poor kid for loss of their father's job.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 07:04 AM
5

The issue is that the 'rich kid' in this case was going around telling everyone that the 'poor kid' has more shoes (more rights) and we should spend money and efforts to raise the standard of the rich kid to poor kid's level by further denying shoes to the poor kid.... And this has been going on since last 50 years... Finally, the father of the rich kid lost job and they are still blaming the poor kid for his job-loss... That's is exactly what is happening. Is it a win? Probably not. Is it fair?…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 06:58 AM
1

Because beta is forced to invest his resources into kids that aren't his... Evolutionary speaking, he will not pass his genes to next generation and will be lost to the gene-pool. Throughout humankind, men who who passed their genes were the ones who made sure that its his kid he is investing in. (There were no DNA tests back then). Naturally, men don't like to be beta. Its a sure shot way of getting eliminated from the gene pool.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/22 06:38 AM
1

Men who are obsessed with N-count aren't encouraged by the society. They are shamed and belittled.. But women who want to 'settle-down' after enjoying her younger years is often encouraged to lie and deceive the guy about her past. As i mentioned in my original comment too, the dual-mating strategy itself isn't bad. Its the societal shaming of men, for 'adapting' to it, that is bad. In a world where majority women follow 'double standards' in dating, men will optimize their strategy to 'alpha fu…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/07/22 06:30 AM
9

My questions were specific. Is the rape law truly gender neutral? If it is, where will I find a similar cohort of F on M rapists? Which section under rape law can F on M be punished? I am not saying that male rapists don't exist. I am saying that you found rapists tp be overwhelmingly male because the rape law is biased and doesn't punish female on M rapists. Thats why your opinion is based on biased observations, hence its not representative of 'all rapists'. Just like you said a lot of girls w…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 06:11 AM
32

Its false rape because the girl has admitted that nothing happened between them. Its a clear case of false-allegation and extortion....
/r/MensRights06/07/22 06:01 AM
10

Parents have no right to make a cosmetic decisions for boys.. Unless medically indicated, infant circumcision is genital mutilation. If they are making that decision, then the boy doesn't have a 'choice' over his bodily decisions..
/r/MensRights06/07/22 05:39 AM
6

Then why is infant male-genital mutilation legal? (FGM is banned)
/r/MensRights06/07/22 05:37 AM
11

In your long essay you missed the important part... Why do you think all 'convicted' marines were males? It could be down to only men being rapists, or down to another sinister reason 'the rape law is biased against men''. It doesn't recognise F on M rape as rape. Your friend only heard the stories of male convicts. This is classical confirmations bias. Yes, there are rapists. And there are laws protecting women (only women mind you) from rape.. That's what this sub stands for. Gender-neutral la…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 05:27 AM
11

Me too is NOT gender neutral. And even if it was, it a modern example of 'mob justice'. A barbaric practice our ancestors abandoned millennia ago. Jonny Depp got justice in the court-of-law. (A democratically defined process). Not by me too. Me too was the reason he suffered so much and lost his income and reputation. Me too doesn't get any credit here. And it would get the blame, but Amber Heard deserves most of the blame anyways.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 05:02 AM
27

Me too is the modern example of 'mob justice'. Its something that our tribal ancestors used to see as justice... Its ironic that after 10k+ years of social development, humanity is going back to its tribal ways...
/r/MensRights06/07/22 04:58 AM
5

Its not the women's standards that is the problem.. it is their 'double-standards' that is the real problem. Women usually have different standards for different men. One for the casual-relationship (alpha fix) and other for marriage/LTR (beta bux). Which, in itself, isn't a bad. But the dynamics clearly favours the 'alpha'. Which gives no incentive for men to persue 'beta' strategy. But the society keeps shaming men and trying to project 'beta bux' as some kind of 'honorable sacrifice'. And men…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/22 03:49 PM
1

Majority of women on PPD are in their late 20s to early 30s, that's when marriage is at its 'most attractive' to her. Women want marriage only when they are ready to settle-down and have kids. Thereby ensuring that her kids will be 'provided-for'. (Not necessarily by the biological father.) This is an inherent disadvantage to men in monogamy. They might end-up providing for a kid that's not biologically his. Religion got around it by enforcing strict gender-norms and traditional restriction on w…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/22 10:02 AM
5

I disagree. As a MGTOW, one thing I have learnt is getting casual sex is very easy. You don't have to manipulate or lie to get it. You just have to ask for it bluntly and be prepared to accept no and walk away. (That ability to walk-away is the key). This is more likely to work with younger women. Generally because, they aren't really looking to settle-down yet.. But it works with older women too. If she is looking for something serious, she will say no, and you walk away.. In fact, a lot of the…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/22 09:50 AM
3

They actually have an ultra-right part (VOX) which is leveraging on the mend agenda.. It was irrelevant only a few elections ago, but is gaining popularity recently..... I personally don't like its other views. But it may have a significant power in spain soon.
/r/PussyPassDenied05/07/22 07:20 AM
1

Humanity has survived because of our inherent altruistic nature. That probably might the last thing standing between feminism and utter destruction of our civilisation. I hope we don't run out of time for that to happen. This is an old comment of mine, but makes sense in present context too.... Its the natural altruism of humanity that would ultimately restore the balance.. Its the reason we went from stone-cutters to space-dwellers in a few thousand years. The feminist hegemony will come to an …
/r/MensRights05/07/22 06:28 AM
6

In my country its 20 weeks, which are extendable to 24 weeks if there is fetal or maternal complication... After 24 weeks its only available for non-viable fetus or if maternal life is in danger.. (In case of rape, its available for 20 weeks. After that ypu need special court's permission to abort.)
/r/MensRights05/07/22 06:14 AM
3

So, you want to justify hanging the grandson for the crimes comitted by his grandfather? What democracy in the world would support that ridiculous stance? You are standing ona thin-ice with that stance. The men you are blaming it on, are long dead. The boys of today have no part in 'historical wrongdoings'. They cannot be punished for crimes of their forefathers. As far as women, being reduced to nursing babies and homemaking is concerned, they did that because home was the safest place to be...…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 06:10 AM
4

Feminism was never meant to help men... It only aims to help women. That too a small minority of 'elite' women.. It doesn't care of anyone else..
/r/MensRights05/07/22 05:22 AM
1

Unreasonable expectations are put on men in dating as well.. Men are 'expected' to make the first move. Men are expected to her out. Men are expected to pay on dates. Men are expected to propose. Lets compensate for it by telling women to ask-out and pay on dates.. Lets end toxic-musculinity.. Hurray! Sounds ridiculous right? That's how your concept of 'telling men to be less manly' sounds like. Its like telling cats to be less agile. Telling dogs to be dishonest. And telling elephants to be sli…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 05:16 AM
5

We don't hate circumcision... We only hate infant male circumcision, that is what I would refer to as 'male-genital mutilation'. With reference to the available medical research, circumcision can, at best, be classified as a cosmetic procedure. (equivalent to nose piercing, vulvoplasty, etc). Hence, circumcision should be allowed only for compelling medical indications. (Making it a surgical procedure, like appendicectomy for example). Routine MGM at birth should be banned. As far as circumcisio…
/r/MensRights05/07/22 05:05 AM
2

Ok I understand... I thought you were talking about twoX
/r/MensRights05/07/22 04:56 AM
1

MGM should not be allowed in the first place, unless there is a compelling medical indication. No human being has to lose their life because of a cosmetic procedure.. Let alone a newborn baby.. One procedure-related death is a sufficient reason to ban such a barbaric practice..
/r/MensRights05/07/22 04:50 AM
1

By 'enough people' if you mean 'feminists', then NO THANKS. Don't need votes of misandrists for mens issues.. Feminists will never vote for the good of men.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 09:16 AM
3

The same rules will apply to victims who are men too. The top comment has a reference to Nicolle Ryan case.. She hired a hitman to kill her ex-husband and then used his 'abusive past' as a defense.. So, a victims past cannot be used as a defense by the accused. But it doesn't apply when the victim is a man and accused is a woman.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 09:13 AM
4

So, 'incel energy' is pardonable when the incels are female?
/r/MensRights01/07/22 07:36 AM
4

Exactly! That's why feminism can never be trusted with gender-equality. Good that you are willing to admit this fact.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 07:35 AM
3

I don't really care about women losing rights or not. But plenty of them are blaming men, so I have a right to defend men. (Pointing towards their own hypocrisy is my way of defending it. Whether you like it or not is none of my business). The overturning may even have its ramifications of MRM. Some of demands like banning MGM and financial abortion may get into focus as well. But I am keeping my fingers-crossed for now. The effect on MRM is unpredictable for now. Wait and watch approach is bett…
/r/MensRights29/06/22 12:57 PM
2

OP gave an example of a TV series which indeed glorifies it.. I am taking his statement on face-value. If you have seen the series in question, then you may change my view. If you haven't, then its not my problem. You probably don't know what we are discussing about.. You can go back to your favourite subreddits which discuss the topics of your interests. Don't troll here.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 12:51 PM
2

Plenty of non-religious people, even atheists, see it as a killing. There are plenty of people on either side of religion spectrum who think circumcision is barbaric as well.. Why is it still allowed then?
/r/MensRights29/06/22 12:48 PM
3

It applies if your justification to killing an unborn human being is 'my body, my choice'.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 11:16 AM
1

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/11/19/growing-share-of-childless-adults-in-u-s-dont-expect-to-ever-have-children/ 27% males vs 16% females. More than half (56%) said they simply do not want kids. Those who gave the reason, most common reason was medical, followed by financial. I cant find the older study. But one done in 2020, also said 25% americans do not want kids. (The articles do not mention the gender break-up, but would be similar ratio)
/r/MensRights29/06/22 11:14 AM
1

If you cannot see how you have a common enemy to fight at the moment, you cannot use your enemy to accomplish your own goals. Feminism is the enemy of mens rights.. Not conservatives.. Conservatives will do what it takes to protect their 'beliefs'. For that they will trample rights of everyone, men included.. But before feminism came, they were mostly fair. Yes, conservative principles were shitty, but they were shitty towards everybody. Not specifically men. Doesn't that make them enemy of mens…
/r/MensRights29/06/22 09:04 AM
35

That is the reason why feminists are asking for 'gender quota' in politics and corporate culture. Because, most of such bigoted women will never be able to attain high-positions with merit alone.. Someone will figure out her true nature, at some point, and halt her progress through the corporate ladder. But gender-quotas allows them to by-pass that natural safety-net.. That is the reason we should always oppose gender-quotas or any such divisive tactics. So that people who reach powerful positio…
/r/MensRights29/06/22 07:49 AM
1

Thats what I had pointed out in ny comment.. The male equivalent of a sex-strike is a 'marriage strike'. (Something that MGTOW advocates for). Both genders know exactly what they bring to the relationship table. Women bring sex and fertility. Men bring resources and protection. When threatened, each one withdraws what they provide. MGTOW is not sex-strike. Its marriage/relationship strike. But principally its equivalent to sex strike, but with genders flipped.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 06:52 AM
1

What is the part of reality that 'a man can refuse to be the father to a baby he didn't consent to have' that is impossible? Perpetual motions machines and FTL travel are physically impossible. (They aren't illegal anyways. You can out ur money into a research if you want. The patent dept even accepts applications with merit.) A man can absolutely refuse to be a father to any baby he didn't consent to. The law only obligated him to pay CS. It is no way inconceivable to change the law.. After all…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 06:47 AM
1

There is no law that says men cant get pregnant. Some transgender people do get pregnant, before or after transition, to have a baby... So, yes, men can and do get pregnant.. There is no law prohibiting it. Child support is also a part of the law. Without this law, there is no obligation for a man to pay any maintainance to his child. The man can choose to run-away. So, if the law can be written once, it can be modified too. Same as abortions. Abortions were universally banned before they became…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 06:42 AM
3

She admitted it on social media. Whether it was a joke or not, is not your decision to make. The action was absolutely fair.. Why are you giving excuses for someone else's actions? Do you know her personally?
/r/MensRights29/06/22 06:33 AM
1

MRM tried to make peace with feminists back in 1980s onwards.. They didn't agree. So some former feminists (Warren Ferrel) founded the Mens liberation movement. (The original one. Not the subreddit). Guess what the feminists did? They barged-in saying 'feminism is for men too', hijacked the movement and diluted it to the point of irrelevance.. That's why MRA was born. There is no making peace with feminists. The history has its lessons to teach. Those who dont learn from history, are bound to re…
/r/MensRights29/06/22 06:30 AM
3

Glorifying infidelity and victim-blaming the cheated-on spouse is recent (feminist) phenomenon. Most cultures were heavy handed against adultery.. Some even awarded death sentence to cheaters.. Yes, infidelity is ancient. But glorifying it is a recent phenomenon.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 06:21 AM
1

I agree that the demographic flip is a huge red flag. But this may also be down to heavy feminist censorship.. (One possible confounding factor). This is evident on r/childfree too, where most posters are female. But most studies (including pew research) suggest that about 20% F and 30% M under 35 are childfree. So, in general population, men are 50% more likely to be childfree than women. But it doesn't reflect in the subreddit. (I am childfree too. But I ll never post there. They will just go …
/r/MensRights29/06/22 06:10 AM
2

You are right. Sildenafil was originally developed as anti-angina medication. But the trails were discontinued due to higher mortality among trail subjects and the risk of sudden cardiac death. Sildenafil is no longer used for cardiac disease. (In fact, its use in erectile dysfunction is also contraindicated if patient has heart disease). Newer, safer analogues of sildenafil (like tadalafil) are used in cardiac conditions..
/r/MensRights29/06/22 06:01 AM
6

Doesn't matter which drug. Racial and political profiling of patient is against medical ethics..
/r/MensRights29/06/22 05:55 AM
16

A similar proportion of women are pro-life too. So what's your point? He clearly meant 'feminists' with 'they' not women. There are plenty of women who hate abortions.. My sister hates it. And she isn't even a religious person.. The idea of a mother killing her own baby is disgusting to a lot of women. (And justifiably so, I think.)
/r/MensRights29/06/22 04:59 AM
8

So is circumcision. Its not about hygiene, its about preventing masturbation.. (Thereby forcing men into unfair deal called 'marriage'). Of course, with modern lubricants its not that difficult for a circumcised man to masturbate. But it would be almost impossible without lubricants... And the pressure to marry is almost gone due to easily available casual sex. But the main reason circumcision was done in the past was to prevent masturbation.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 04:55 AM
5

Frenulum tear during first time sex isn't that uncommon. Its the male-equivalent of hymenal bleeding that most women experience when they lose their virginity. (Although its much less common). Using circumcision to prevent frenulum tear is like doing routine hymenectomy for all newborn girls. Its ridiculous (and FGM)! Like losing virginity in girls, frenular bleeding is usually mild and stops with little pressure.. Just because you freaked out doesn't mean its abnormal or life. threatening..
/r/MensRights29/06/22 04:47 AM
12

Feminists should have zero say in circumcision. Irrespective of whether its USA or any other country. Circumcision has nothing to do with women rights. So its not a feminist issue.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 04:40 AM
1

Its not about scheme. Its about law. If its legal, schemes will develop over time.. The question is about legal 'equality'.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 12:31 PM
1

I already stated in my first comment that, financial abortion would be valid only of done within statutory time limit. (Which, for convenience, I would prefer to be 2-3 weeks less than the limit for medical abortion. That is 16-24 weeks). Its not an option to abandon an already born baby. For that you have other options like adoption/safe heaven laws. The term 'abortion' only applies to fetus. After the childbirth, it would be adoption. Which is already available to parents.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 12:29 PM
2

There are non-sexual ways to have babies. I ll just donate my sperms to a clinic and whoever wants to take them can take... Nothing bad will happen to humanity. Don't worry!
/r/MensRights28/06/22 09:37 AM
2

There are lot of 'right things' these same people aren't on-board with. Male only draft. Gender-neutral rape and DV laws. Infant genital mutilation.. Male victims of rape being ordered child support. Free pass to false accusers. Non-biological men being ordered child support, despite DNA evidence... If these 'rightfully pissed' people actually fought for 'right' things, this day would never have come. Abortion rights have nothing to do with men. (At least so I have been told.). Not my fight, not…
/r/MensRights28/06/22 09:35 AM
9

The male equivalent is MGTOW. And they are already around for quite a while. Its ironic that, when your rights are taken away, both sexes resort to the same strategy... Turns out, men and women are more similar than different. Isn't it?
/r/MensRights28/06/22 09:28 AM
13

Marriage is a monogamous institution. So, yes sex is a part of the deal. And no one signs up to bring politics into their bedroom... Not having sex due to medical or physical reasons is perfectly acceptable. But if you bring politics into your bedroom, then you should also be ready to face the consequences of your decision.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 09:06 AM
3

I ll agree john here. Sex for money isn't rape. It would qualify as prostitution. How many prostitutes, do you think, actually 'enjoy' sex? Most do not enjoy. They simply do it for money. Yet there are prostitutes pretty much in every corner of the world. (And the avg prostitute cost way less than $1000). So, I wouldn't be surprised to find an equivalent number straight men ready to have paid sex with gay men. Majority of men wont. The same way majority of women are against prostitution. But it …
/r/MensRights28/06/22 08:58 AM
1

Giving the option to financial abortion 'after the child is born' is ridiculous. It can only be allowed while the legal status of the child is still 'fetus'. That is before viability.. The onus is on the putative father to approach the appropriate authorities to get the paperwork done. As I said in another comment. There will be plenty of NGOs, non-profit organizations, and charities that will quickly cash-in. (Consider the male equivalent of planned parenthood). Within a few decades, it will al…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/06/22 05:12 AM
1

That wouldn't be a big issue in the long-run. When abortions were first legalized, they weren't as safe and easy as today.. There were serious risks like infection, permanent/temporary infertility and even maternal death. But with medical advances they have become safe and convenient. Organizations like 'planned parenthood' offer free abortion services. And they are openly advertised in maternity clinics. Once financial abortions become legal, a lot of organisations and NGOs will offer free/subs…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 05:28 PM

There is an easy way to implement it.. Put a statutory time limit on paper abortion, similar to abortion. (Preferably 2-4 weeks less so that the mother gets time to undergo abortion in case she doesn't want to continue as single mother). Once signed, paper abortion is irreversible and irrevocable. The man gets no legal rights as father, even if he reappears later in child's life. He also has no say in subsequent adoption or care of the kid. Once the statutory time limit is over, he cannot financ…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/06/22 05:18 PM
6

Last time I had a conversation with a feminist, it was with the mod of Menslib. I had posted the a comment asking for gender-neutral rape laws. With a link to articles describing how feminist organisations opposed proposed gender neutral rape laws in some countries. (Namely India, UK, Israel, S. Korea). I was called an 'incel' and my comment was removed. (It was shadow banned that's why I gad that conversation).
/r/MensRights27/06/22 03:49 PM
14

It wasn't a problem until it came down to 'a man can be a woman'. When women wanted to be 'men', the feminists as well as the society supported them. They called 'gender' a 'social construct'. The whole transgender movement stemmed from these notions. Nobody had any issue with it, until... 'Men could become women'. In a world where only men get all the privileges. Where only women are 'oppressed'. Why will any man want to become a 'woman' and choose an 'oppressed life'? And why will feminists tr…
/r/MensRights27/06/22 12:58 PM
22

The only reason she could talk about sex-strike is because she was married. (My prayers are with her poor husband!). You should dare her to convince an 18 years old single party-girl to go on a sex-strike. If she can convince even 3 out of 10 such girls, I ll support her 'sex-strike' wholeheartedly.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 10:11 AM
2

Exactly! This clearly seems to be racially motivated vendetta politics. The local police should investigate it thoroughly. Hopefully the BLM activists catch of wind of it too.
/r/MensRights27/06/22 10:06 AM
1

It is the same way fat-shaming is a 'feminist' issue... Technically both should not be in a political movement. But if its good for goose, then its good for the gander!
/r/MensRights27/06/22 09:56 AM
2

One of the advantages of not getting dates in young age is that you get into your 30s single. That's when you are mature enough to not let any 'random' women into your life. And old enough to understand the 'perils' of marriage. (Often first-hand experience, seeing some of your own friends getting divorced). That's when the bliss of being single and independent begins to sink-in. As a man, who was also ignored till mid-twenties by all girls, the freedom and independence is something I wont trade…
/r/MensRights27/06/22 09:51 AM
-1

She isn't a regular poster here. And most of her posts are on r-teengers... Are you seriously judging a teenage girl for the quality of her posts? At least she isn't trolling. Unlike a lot of 'paid imposters' out here. Who only post to troll. She may not be aware of the real mens issues yet. But eventually she will be. Considering her age, I am glad that at least she has the critical thinking to question the mainstream narrative. Most of the youth today (both genders) are too indoctrinated to ev…
/r/MensRights27/06/22 09:17 AM
2

If they are blaming us then we should call them misandrists or femcels... Not support their man-hatred. Makes sense? (Hope you the sarcasm in first half of my statement)
/r/MensRights27/06/22 08:02 AM
2

The impact is exactly as intended. The society has been telling boys for decades that 'my body, my choice' doesn't apply to men. Naturally most men will not support such a biased notion. If feminists had stood up against the religious brigade against circumcision, a lot of men would have stood-up against religious brigade for abortion rights too. The court decision is a win for religious brigade. The same one that supports circumcision. This is what happens when a movement constantly alienates h…
/r/MensRights27/06/22 07:14 AM
14

Banning abortion is also a law now. So, why are u so upset?
/r/MensRights27/06/22 07:05 AM
6

Do you support financial abortion? Where were the feminists when Men have been demanding for rights to 'financial abortion' and 'no child-support obligations towards non-biological child'? I am not against abortion. But as long as men do not get equal say / financial abortion rights, it doesn't really affect men. Not my circus, not my monkeys! Bye bye!
/r/MensRights27/06/22 07:02 AM
1

De-transitioning is not always possible. Especially in surgically transitioned patients. De-transitioning rates will always be lower than total number people who regret transitioning. That's why 'regret' rates are higher among post-surgery patients. There are other causes of regret too, like body-image issues. And not satisfied with the final cosmetic outcome etc.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 05:43 AM
1

Freedom and security This comes at cost. 90% of victims of violent crimes are men. 99% victims of war are men. Men have more freedom, because men pay price for that freedom. Men also take more risks, which predisposed them to violence, but gives a false sense of 'freedom'. As a man, I control when encounters happen with women That's ridiculous. If a woman wants to approach a man, nothing stops her from doing so. How is 'being lazy to approach' considered a disadvantage? Most men will call this a…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/06/22 06:52 AM
7

This! Most girls can put an act for 1-2 years till you put a ring on it. Even those who are (initially) genuine can change after marriage or childbirth. The truth is that, marriage as an institution is on the decline in the west... It is better to never get married. And if want an alternative, just cohabitate with a legally binding document. Provide her and your future kids with insurances and equity to cover-up any unforseen loses. And move-along. The biggest problem with marriage is that, its …
/r/MensRights23/06/22 06:21 AM
0

There are lots of trans people who regret the transitioning. I don't know much about the subreddit. (It could a troll sub Idk). But research shows that about 4-11% people regret transitioning. The regret is higher for surgery, than only hormone therapy. (The former is irreversible)
/r/MensRights23/06/22 06:08 AM
5

I’ve read many accounts of sperm donor kids successfully getting records about who their biological father is despite guarantees this information would be kept confidential. That is one of the main reasons for shortage of sperm donors in UK.. The law got passed in 2006 (I guess?), so the first donor-kid will get the right to know their father by 2024. A lot of young men donate sperms at very young age. They eventually get married and have family later in life. The thought that, some random perso…
/r/MensRights23/06/22 06:00 AM
6

Most girls tell their BF what to and what not to wear. There was a recent relationship advice thread, where the GF didn't want her BF to have a moustache (which he took 1 month to grow). Nobody called her 'controlling'. Infact, most comments were saying that she a right to tell her BF whether he should have a moustache or not, and 'my body, my choice' doesn't apply in relationships... (But it does apply when she wants an abortion. How convenient!)
/r/MensRights23/06/22 05:47 AM
12

They also don't like gender-neutral rape, DV and marriage/custody laws. The list is endless!
/r/MensRights23/06/22 04:05 AM
4

I think male-feminist is a more appropriate word to describe him than 'in***'.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 02:10 PM
1

Most women choose not to persue STEM because they want to 'get married' and 'have babies' by early to mid-thirties, at least. A timeline that is fundamentally incompatible with any high-paying STEM field. Statistically men and women are almost equal in stem fields. Nearly 90-95% nurses are women. Which comprises over 50% of on-ground personel in medical field. This alone makes the medical field by-far a female dominated field. (Enough to keep the ratio M:F close to 50:50 in STEM). Similarly, the…
/r/MensRights21/06/22 06:18 AM
-1

If there are no biological differences, and transpeople were given puberty blockers and hormone therapy, then why should it matter what 'biological sex' they were born with? Even by olympic guidelines, all trans athletes aren't allowed in women's sports. Only those who satisfy certain criteria (as laid and updated by the comittee).
/r/MensRights21/06/22 06:07 AM
3

So don't participate in activism. Leave this sub. (And your beloved feminist subs too).
/r/MensRights21/06/22 05:59 AM
18

That depends on what you define 'misogynists'. Men who point out to bad behavior of women ≠misogynist. Men who oppose feminism ≠ misogynist. Men who attack misandrists ≠ misogynist. Men/women who hate or spread hatred towards women (key word 'women' not feminists) = misogynist..
/r/MensRights21/06/22 05:58 AM
5

There is no trade-off. "No free man shall be imprisoned, punished or otherwise harmed except by the lawful judgement of his peers". This statement is from magna carta, one of founding principles of democracy. This trade-off cannot be allowed in a democracy. And the day its allowed, the democracy will begin its inevitable collapse.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 03:00 PM
30

Rape laws are like that in 60-70% countries.. Similar laws prevail in UK, India, Brazil amd most of commonwealth countries. Where do you think '99% rapists are men' statistics come from? It is based on the same gender-biased laws. If rape laws were truly gender-neutral, the distribution would be close to 60-70% M-F.
/r/MensRights20/06/22 02:43 PM
1

Just ignore her. And if she says anything sexist or sexual to ypu, just report to the HR. And if they don't take any action, just quit your company, join another company and two years later make a twitter post with 'me too' tagging your ex-company and the harrasser.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 04:36 PM
3

I am technically a MGTOW. But I haven't sworn-off women. I do date around on short-term basis. I keep shifting my work cities due to my work (every 3-4 yrs), so it makes it easy to say that I am not 'looking for long-term' or 'not looking to settle down'. Most women I have met are wonderful. In fact, if you ask me top 10 people I can count on, 5 of them would be women. (That includes my mother and two sisters). You don't have swear-off women. You just have to swear-off marriage. Which, I think, …
/r/MensRights17/06/22 04:03 PM
1

Feminism would have reached this far if men didn't stand for 'equality'...
/r/MensRights17/06/22 02:17 PM
2

Why do you think that? People don't marry randomly. A lot of this like religiousness, similar culture, similar career all get factored in. People marry other people reasonably similar to them.. The good people just tend to stay married once they get married. They are removed from the dating pool. Even if we start 50-50 proportion, the good people that get married, stay married. So, most of the remaining 50% people who are unmarried after 30, would be comprised of people who didn't bother to marr…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/22 05:24 AM
2

Because your wife is a reasonable parent. The problem arises when you are dealing with wacko women. The courts sides with the woman, regardless of whether she is reasonable or crazy. Most are reasonable. But enough of them are crazy. The biggest problem is there is no way to identify the good ones from bad ones. The bad ones pretend to be 'good' until they get the ring. Then the govt gets involved, and we know with whom the courts will side. Honestly, there are crazy men too. Roughly in equal pr…
/r/MensRights15/06/22 05:00 AM
5

Now reframe the question with daughter being 38 and the man being 48.. Suddenly the 10+ age difference seems small, doesn't it?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 10:01 AM
1

Then he will die in a few years leaving her with all the 'inheritance'. The benefits and loses go both ways.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 10:00 AM
8

Its the same thing as height-gap couples.. Women whine and cry about having to date short men everywhere on internet. But in real life, most couples are 'height-matched'. That means the guy is at similar height or slightly taller than the girl. If you read internet, you will think all girls go after tall guys. Some do, and are very vocal about it. But most date guys who are close to her in height..... Its rare to see huge height gap couple in real life. Same goes for age-gap couples.. The only e…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 09:57 AM
2

This behavior has evolutionary advantages.. Millions of years ago, forest fires were a nuisance.. (They still are to most animals). But a 'douchebag' caveman decided to tame that fire and use it for our advantage. The idea was almost certainly recieved negatively by his fellows tribesmen. It ran the risk of burning their whole village down. But it proved to be the greatest discovery of humankind. Same thing when we invented the wheel, metallurgy, etc. Galileo was outcast by the church and jailed…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 09:45 AM
1

Feminism was apty supported by simp politicians and religious leaders. Although a lot of women support MRM, they aren't in high enough positions to affect a political change... We will have to wait and watch.. Or just withdraw from the society and let the welfare system collapse without taxpayers.. Either ways, feminism loses. Whether humanity wins or loses, depends on how the scenario plays out.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 07:38 AM
25

Its funny in some way. Men get killed in the war... Nobody cares. Boys' genitalia are mutilated routinely.. Nobody cares. Men get raped, baby trapped.. Nobody cares. Paternity fraud...nobody cares. Male suicide .. Nobody cares.. Sexual and domestic violence against men.. Nobody cares... Male fertility starts decreasing... Suddenly all alarms bells start ringing! Guess which gender is most objectified in the western society today?
/r/MensRights14/06/22 07:28 AM
1

Average age of marriage is 29 for men. So, ~50% are married by 29. That means they met their 'wife' somewhere in early to mid twenties. (Assuming reasonable progression of the relationship). So, 50% of those 80% marriage definitely have a 'low count'. The other 30% may be struggling in dating. Not necessarily virgin, but probably do not have much options anyways. And to top it off, I can guarantee that closer to 90% of men WOULD have casual sex with women if they could, and a lot of it. That's y…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 05:27 AM
2

Ya true. Neither do most men. But generally people who are left single after 30s are those who slept around. This increases the red pill bias. Same reason women complain about 'where are good men'. The good men and good women are usually married to each other. The older you get, the less good people will be in your dating pool.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 05:18 AM
3

If 20% men have multiple partners, then rest of the 80% men would have no partners, or a few monogamous partners in the past. The same is the case with women. Most don't 'sleep around'. Most women find their life partners by 25, and average age for women at marriage is 27 in USA. Most people who are monogamous, do find a partner by 30. If you aren't married by then, then either you were very unlucky or you didn't bother to find a partner anyways. Marriage is a crap because of laws and family cou…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/06/22 05:13 AM
1

Not exactly.. People date people with similar mindset. High 'count' men prefer high 'count' women. And vice versa. People with lower counts often tend to be more religious. Again, religion is also an important factor in dating. You can call it 'missed opportunity' in terms of short-term dating. But for long-term dating, a lot more important factors need to be taken into account over 'mere opportunity'. Things like compatibility, faithfulness, and similar outlook towards relationship are importan…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/22 05:50 PM
4

Most of those women who are in relationship or married at 30, are mostly the ones who didn't 'sleep around' in their 20s.. It takes 4-5 years to start a relationship from scratch, date a bit, stay together long enough and eventually get married.. Most women (and men) who are married at 30, probably started dating their spouse in late teens or early twenties.. Yes, there are exemptions. But this is a general guideline to having a monogamous long-term relationship..
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/22 05:40 PM
1

You are partially correct. Men who have multiple partners in the past, usually do not care about the 'count' of their present partner. But men who didn't have much sexual success in their 20s (voluntarily or otherwise) do care for their partner's count. Now you do the math. How many men really end up having multiple partners in their 20s. Hardly 10-20%. So 80% do care about their partner's 'count'. Whether you like it or not. That fact would not change.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/22 05:35 PM
1

I'm pretty sure most men would be pretty fucking mad if laws were created that told him what to do with his body. How would you feel about forced vasectomy? How about male-only conscription? How about male victims of statutory rape being ordered CS. BY LAW! What about non-biological fathers (paternity fraud victims) being ordered CS? What about infant male genital mutilation being legal? Where does the body-autonomity go now?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/22 05:26 PM
2

Sending nudes is punishable under law. Making false accusations and slandering a man's name on social media (without proof) isn't punishable under law.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/22 05:20 PM
3

Decrease in marriage rates may be an important factor in rise in male happiness. In 1972, ~72% american men above 18 yrs were married. Today, its just 49%.... This factor may well be pivotal in rise in male happiness.. (Its enough to offset the negative effect of other factors like decrease in median wage, greater unemployment rates, and decrease in college education among men.)
/r/MensRights13/06/22 02:27 PM
3

And as it turns out...we men are doing just fine in the happiness department. In fact, American men are HAPPIER now than we were in the 70s There is a 'single reason' why men are happier today than in 70s. Marriage rates have dropped by over 50% in last 50 years. In 1972, 72% american men over 18 were married. Today, its just 49%. No wonder, men are happier today. Society and feminists have worked hard to remove the single cause of unhappiness in men. (All other causes of male unhappiness have a…
/r/MensRights13/06/22 02:19 PM
3

Not just one-sided story. She used her 'gender-card' as well... I am sorry, but no man in history can pull that off using his gender alone.
/r/MensRights13/06/22 02:03 PM
2

Feminism is rampant with misandry all day long. Yet it recieves billions of dollars of taxpayers money as funding... So, misandry is acceptable? But misogyny is bad? This tells me a lot about the society.. The laws have been in existence for decades. Nobody seems to have ammended them... The reason why it is so, would be pretty obvious once you know the fact I mentioned. (How society tolerates misandry and actively funds it)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/22 03:28 AM
1

The very fact that you are on reddit, that means you haven't deleted 'social media'. Technically, reddit is also a form of social media.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 01:58 PM
11

I don't think egalitarianism and feminism are anywhere close to being 'similar'... I think anybody who believes in gender-equality would agree with gender-neutral laws, equal shared parenting laws, banning of all forms of infant genital mutilations (male and female), reforms in family court laws, non-bio parents and rape victims being exempt from hold support. And equal protection of all DV and SA victims irrespective of gender. The truth is feminists have actively lobbied for gender-biased laws…
/r/MensRights12/06/22 01:54 PM
2

If men stop dating down. They will die single. Which is fine for me. But are more men willing to live the bachelor life?
/r/MensRights12/06/22 12:21 PM
6

Because there are 2 billion children in the world. But you only raise 1or 2 that are 'biologically yours'. If its ok to raise any random kid, then why do hospitals follow strict paper-trail to make sure kids aren't interchanged in the nursery? The only exception here would be 'voluntary adoption'. The keyword here is 'voluntary'. Not fraud or deception!
/r/MensRights12/06/22 06:58 AM
7

Doesn't matter! Once the matter was settled the court, she had no right to publically accuse him. If she wanted a review, she can file an appeal. Extra-judicial Mob justice isn't legal in democratic countries.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 06:51 AM
3

There are lot of amoral things in the society that are absolutely legal.. Paternity fraud is legal. Courts even order the man to pay CS even when he has DNA proof showing he isn't the bio-father. False accusations are amoral. But legal. A society that tolerates these things shouldn't complain about 'amorality' of TRP. TRP wouldn't even have been a thing, if the society hadn't stooped-low to such depths in it's amorality.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 06:33 AM
1

Class-for-class women in the west are better than men of the same class.. Rich women are better off than rich men. Poor women are better than poor men. Homeless women get more support than homeless men. Black women are treated better than black men. White women are treated better than white men. Asian women are treated better than asian men. (In west). Single moms get better treatment and more welfare than single fathers. Even, Violent and criminal women are also treated better than criminal men…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 05:50 AM
1

Even if rad fems think sex is binary... (Which is also the scientific consensus in general), there still exists TWO SEXES. So, gender equality should consider the interests, disadvantages and sufferings of BOTH GENDERS. The evidence I gave points towards the opposite. No mistakes were made. Feminists did that (lobbied for gender biased laws) because they believe in that ideology. If it was a mistake, they would have accepted it by now and corrected it. Muslims who support terrorists are terroris…
/r/MensRights12/06/22 04:15 AM
1

People who are pushing for curbs on women in middle east are not 'feminists'. I gave examples of 'feminists' who lobbied for gender-biased laws. They are sponsored by govt. And drawing international as well as national funds in the name of 'feminism'. Why are the so-called 'true feminists' silent on misappropriation of their funds? And the misuse of it's name? Feminists are funding and shielding radicals within it. That makes all (or most of) feminists radicals. Same logic as terrorism. If there…
/r/MensRights11/06/22 04:57 AM
134

Don't femsplain here.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 04:43 AM
4

Honestly that's not issue here.. The clue lies in OP's post "she is out-of-my-league". OP himself has a lot of insecurities here. And his GF triggered those insecurities.. If my GF thinks the most attractive part of me is a 'safe option' then I would leave too. OP was harsh because he was triggered. His GF may not be an asshole here. But neither is OP. He would be better off leaving this relationship for good. His GF then can choose another 'safe' option after that.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 04:30 AM
1

The problem is there are also 3 women who will be making false-accusations to 'settle scores'. Shouldn't there be a law against this?
/r/MensRights11/06/22 04:15 AM
1

The groups that argued against gender neutral laws were mainstream taxpayer funded 'feminist' groups.. I have linked 3 countries from 3 different continents (India, USA, Spain). You gave example of one country. (Canada). Which recently passed a bill to provide covid-unemployment aid to women only. Canadian govt itself doesn't follow its laws. If the groups I linked were 'radical feminists' why rest of the feminists are funding and shielding them? Why feminists (whichever ones you call as 'true f…
/r/MensRights11/06/22 04:12 AM
2

The articles are 'evidence' of actions of mainstream taxpayer funded feminists... Actions speak louder that words.. If I have to choose between a feminist sponsored outdated book and on-ground action of feminists, the choice would be obvious..
/r/MensRights11/06/22 04:05 AM
9

You dont need to convince her for the test. Just maintain that you two never had sex.. (I believe that's the truth). Rest of the things, ur lawyer will take care of. They will ask you where were you on the said day and time. Reveal only verifiable facts. If you mention a place and cant prove it, they will use it against you.. If its a remote date, you can simply tell that you don't recollect the exact place. The burden is on her to prove the paternity or even whether you two had sex. So deny bot…
/r/MensRights10/06/22 10:01 AM
2

There are lots of female incels. Most of them are concentrated among feminists.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 09:47 AM
3

You don't need books to see what real feminism is. Just read the articles I have linked.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 09:45 AM
1

I have already posted it before, but thus sounds like an apt reply to the muslim analogy. https://m.timesofindia.com/india/activists-join-chorus-against-gender-neutral-rape-laws/articleshow/18840879.cms https://www.britannica.com/event/Violence-Against-Women-Act https://evaw-global-database.unwomen.org/fr/countries/europe/spain/2004/constitutional-act-1-2004-of-28-december--on-integrated-protection-measures-against-gender-violence I am talking about taxpayer funded feminists organisations direct…
/r/MensRights10/06/22 09:43 AM
2

Women complain when we close the lid too. They have a problem with it coz they gave to 'touch' the seat/lid to open with. Not with the position of lid/seat itself. So, closing both also pisses them off. Although, that's the most hygeinic thing to do.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 08:35 AM
1

That's because you live in a western country. Only 1-2% muslim population.. Go to a country with 90% muslims and the only people brandishing guns there would be muslims. Look at the videos of taliban.. You will find plenty of muslims 'showing their guns and storming the capital'. All humans are violent and dangerous. Not just white. Your comment tells us about your own racist mindset. If you make the video of violence, then majority people in that video would be the local majority. Its your bigo…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 07:23 AM
1

All people marry thinking that their marriage will last forever. But ~50% end-up in divorce anyways. A man who has insight to choose a good woman, can still be deceived by a lying wife. And if he has the maturity to maintain a marriage (plus the insight) then he also has the maturity to understand that its a one-sided deal. Statistically it takes less hardwork to look after yourself, then to look after 4-5 people. Whichever way you look at it, marriage is a shitty deal.. Of course you can have a…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/06/22 07:15 AM
3

What about muslim terrorists who also kill based on their emotions.. Recent Karachi suicide attack was conducted by a woman (look it up). Only racist and sexist people like you can assign gender/race/religion to violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 10:35 AM
1

Go and read my reply in the original thread. There are links to the actions of taxpayer funded feminists groups. Its not my responsibility to fix feminism. Have a look at their actions. Come up with an action plan how this can be fixed. And then we will discuss how we can 'work together'.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 10:10 AM
1

I did reply to OP. With the message that contains evidence of how taxpayer funded feminist organizations lobbied against gender neutral rape and DV laws in some countries. (With actual link to the articles.) Guess what! OP didn't reply. My reply shatters the illusion that feminists want to help mens issues. (They actually lobby against male-friendly laws). So they didn't reply. Now go and find your evidence that feminists do indeed want to help. (My reply is still there in the thread if you look…
/r/MensRights09/06/22 10:02 AM
1

There is nothing to communicate with feminists. Why will they fight for mens issues?
/r/MensRights09/06/22 09:31 AM
1

OP's post was about feminist. Its literally in the title.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 09:18 AM
2

Happy marriages do not fall-out of thin air. They need a lot of hard work and efforts.(and resources) And sometimes after doing all this, your spouse can one day just leave you for 'no-fault' of yours and take your kids and 50% assets. Hard work and smart planning can make you happy regardless of marriage. But marriage is the only thing that can make a hardworking, smart-planning man broke. And sad You don't need marriage to have kids, anyways. That's biology 101!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 09:16 AM
1

Ok.. Prove that I am making a 'blanket statement'. Get any feminist subreddit to accept your stance on making rape and DV laws gender neutral. There dozens of them. You can find 'any two'. If even two of the dozens feminist subreddits do not agree with your stance, then it proves that my 'blanket' statement has some weightage. Definitely more weightage then your empty talks.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 09:07 AM
3

I have already communicated and told by feminists that they don't address mens issues. I don't need some 'imposter' to speak from their behalf. If you think that they would 'work together', then the burden is on you to prove it.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 07:22 AM
0

I agree with OP here. You don't need all that to be happy or successful. You can be happy on your own. With friends, with family (spouse and children are not only 'family'), or even an animal companion. Meeting new people, and doing new things doesn't require a romantic partner. Its only when you stop persuing relationships and become truly happy with yourself, is the time ypu realize that romantic relationships are such a 'waste of time'. As single, bachelor I have much more time to myself. To …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 07:09 AM
3

Prove your statement. Then we will discuss 'ways' of working together. You know the truth. Feminists don't want to address mens issues. Just admit it.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 06:51 AM
3

You are yet to prove that feminists want to work together for mens issues. You cannot work with people who don't want to work with you. So, don't waste my time. Come back with the proof. And we will definitely see what areas we can have a collaboration in.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 06:50 AM
2

There is a lot of incel behavior on feminist subs too. The only difference is that those incels are females!
/r/MensRights09/06/22 06:40 AM
3

I didn't tell you to post about fathers rights or male prostate health. Gender neutral rape law is a 'gender equality' issue. Not a male specific issue. I told you post a gender neutral subject on feminist subreddit. You don't even have the 'balls' to do it... So, stop talking about working together with them.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 06:06 AM
3

Ok prove it that feminists want to work together with MRAs. Post about gender neutral rape and DV laws on feminist subreddit and come back to tell what response you get. Why are you so afraid to face the truth?
/r/MensRights09/06/22 06:03 AM
7

Perhaps he is using white emojis coz he is white. What's your objection to that? Why are you being racist?!
/r/MensRights09/06/22 06:00 AM
3

You talked about 'working together'. Not me. I don't care what feminists do. They can fix their own problems. There is nothing to 'work together' with them.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 05:56 AM
3

'Working together' implies that feminists also 'work-together' for mens issues. I didn't even tell you to change the laws. Just post about changing 'certain' laws to make them gender-neutral on a feminist subreddit. And you got 'cold feet' by even the thought of doing that. Now tell me, who is afraid of working together? Why should MRM work with feminists if they are not even on-board with the issues we raise? Let alone actually do something about these issues. You know exactly what feminists wa…
/r/MensRights09/06/22 05:53 AM
5

The most important support base for feminism are the simp-male-feminists. The day it loses that support, feminism will begin its journey into the oblivion. There are signs that it might have already begun!
/r/MensRights09/06/22 05:20 AM
5

Partially disagree. As a MGTOW, I can tell that most men are completely unaware that a woman can literally destroy his life.. So, when it does happen, it hits like a train. They are submissive because popular media portrays it to be a healthy relationship-dynamic. (It isn't except on silver screen). Men who are truly aware that a woman can destroy their life, do not get married. (Or at least vet carefully or demand prenup.)
/r/MensRights09/06/22 04:46 AM
3

Go and prove that you are here to work together. Post about passing gender neutral rape and DV laws, in countries that do not have them neutral (>75% tp be frank), on any feminist subreddit. Lets see how many feminists truly want to 'work together'... Do tell me what answer you get!
/r/MensRights09/06/22 04:12 AM
7

So, you want to say that a feminist comes here to argue, but doesn't have time to read a coherent argument with factual data and links? Then why did they come here? To troll!
/r/MensRights09/06/22 04:09 AM
11

This sub is shitting on you, and you aren't a woman.. We attack femimists. Not women. There are plenty of female posters here who get top votes. You wont even know they are women, unless you ask them.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 04:06 AM
2

This is a copy paste of another of my comments here https://m.timesofindia.com/india/activists-join-chorus-against-gender-neutral-rape-laws/articleshow/18840879.cms https://www.britannica.com/event/Violence-Against-Women-Act https://evaw-global-database.unwomen.org/fr/countries/europe/spain/2004/constitutional-act-1-2004-of-28-december--on-integrated-protection-measures-against-gender-violence "No I was talking about taxpayer funded feminists organisations directly or indirectly supported by ele…
/r/MensRights09/06/22 04:04 AM
2

There is a difference between 'not asking' and 'not seeking'. Women don't ask men out because they are afraid of rejection.. Its a well known fact that women don't take rejection very well. And women asking men out isn't that rare as internet makes it out to be. Its about 30-70 distribution. Its less common, but far from 'rare'... Women also employ a lot of 'indirect' ways of asking out. Like peer pressure, 'setting-up' by friends and families and casually asking during social gatherings.. I am …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 03:48 AM
14

https://m.timesofindia.com/india/activists-join-chorus-against-gender-neutral-rape-laws/articleshow/18840879.cms https://www.britannica.com/event/Violence-Against-Women-Act https://evaw-global-database.unwomen.org/fr/countries/europe/spain/2004/constitutional-act-1-2004-of-28-december--on-integrated-protection-measures-against-gender-violence No I was talking about taxpayer funded feminists organisations directly or indirectly supported by elected democratic govts. All muslims are not terrorists…
/r/MensRights08/06/22 09:35 AM
2

My point was that, both women and men have worked hard throughout human history. During our early agriculture-based economy days, most of the work in field and animal husbandry was unpaid. People worked in the field, and ate what they grew. (Or slaughtered animals that they raised). As economy grew more complex, people started to monetize niche skills. Obviously, the skills that could be monetized were laborious, dangerous, or rare ones. Men also ventured on risky tasks to gain money or precious…
/r/MensRights08/06/22 07:38 AM
2

I agree that women entering workforce did reduce the median wages... But you should also examine the root cause, why women started entering workforce in the first place. This mainly comes down to electrification of world, availability of household gadgets which reduce or eliminate housework, and growth of fast food or ready to eat meals... The role of woman in house is now minimal, and mostly limited to first 2-3 years of kid's life. So, it makes sense that women work and help out their spouses.…
/r/MensRights08/06/22 05:04 AM
25

Feminists have opposed gender neutral rape, DV and draft laws in almost every country where a neutral law was proposed. Doesn't sound like 'equality for both genders' to me!
/r/MensRights08/06/22 04:53 AM
28

I have been called incel for demanding gender-neutral rape laws. And guess on which sub? Menslib!
/r/MensRights08/06/22 04:51 AM
1

https://www.womenalliance.org/no-to-female-conscription/ Norwegian feminists actually opposed gender-neutral draft.. Norway doesn't have neutral draft 'because of' feminists. It has gender-neutral draft 'despite of' feminists.. Idk about Canada. But feminists have opposed gender neutral draft in many countries, including USA. (They have also opposed gender neutral rape and DV laws). The very fact that some countries gave gender-neutral laws is a sign that society still believes in 'equality' ove…
/r/MensRights08/06/22 04:45 AM
3

You didn't specify 'exactly how' the society will harm MGTOW... Yes, if a man becomes violent or commits crimes, then may be they can. But what if a MGTOW just goes about his business, pays his bills, and entertains himself in his free time? Its inconceivable that a democratic society will legitimately harm him. (Unless they are willing to break laws). Breaking laws may work with a few individuals (FBI does it all day!). But once the number of such men becomes substantial, that would be impossib…
/r/MensRights08/06/22 04:20 AM
5

We just want gender neutral laws for sexual offences, (including rape), Domestic violence, draft, genital mutilation. Also, gender neutral family and marriage laws, equal custody and child support laws. Child support to be based strictly on DNA reports or adoption papers (where voluntary adoption is applicable). And equal right to abortion for all genders.. In case physical abortion is not viable option, then financial abortion. If you want to know why we oppose feminism. Well that is because fe…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 02:51 PM
2

We just want gender neutral laws for sexual offences, (including rape), Domestic violence, draft, genital mutilation. Also, gender neutral family and marriage laws, equal custody and child support laws. Child support to be based strictly on DNA reports or adoption papers (where voluntary adoption is applicable). And equal right to abortion for all genders.. In case physical abortion is not viable option, then financial abortion. If you want to know why we oppose feminism. Well that is because fe…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 02:44 PM
1

We just want gender neutral laws for sexual offences, (including rape), Domestic violence, draft, genital mutilation. Also, gender neutral family and marriage laws, equal custody and child support laws. Child support to be based strictly on DNA reports or adoption papers (where voluntary adoption is applicable). And equal right to abortion for all genders.. In case physical abortion is not viable option, then financial abortion. If you want to know why we oppose feminism. Well that is because fe…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 02:38 PM
1

We just want gender neutral laws for sexual offences, (including rape), Domestic violence, draft, genital mutilation. Also, gender neutral family and marriage laws, equal custody and child support laws. Child support to be based strictly on DNA reports or adoption papers (where voluntary adoption is applicable). And equal right to abortion for all genders.. In case physical abortion is not viable option, then financial abortion. If you want to know why we oppose feminism. Well that is because fe…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 02:37 PM
1

We just want gender neutral laws for sexual offences, (including rape), Domestic violence, draft, genital mutilation. Also, gender neutral family and marriage laws, equal custody and child support laws. Child support to be based strictly on DNA reports or adoption papers (where voluntary adoption is applicable). And equal right to abortion for all genders.. In case physical abortion is not viable option, then financial abortion. If you want to know why we oppose feminism. Well that is because fe…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 02:36 PM
1

We just want gender neutral laws for sexual offences, (including rape), Domestic violence, draft, genital mutilation. Also, gender neutral family and marriage laws, equal custody and child support laws. Child support to be based strictly on DNA reports or adoption papers (where voluntary adoption is applicable). And equal right to abortion for all genders.. In case physical abortion is not viable option, then financial abortion. If you want to know why we oppose feminism. Well that is because fe…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 02:36 PM
8

I read your post.. And I also commented in favor of your son's teacher who actually helped to make an early diagnosis of a learning difficulty in your son.. That thread has lots of very balanced comments.. Unfortunately feminist trolls are a problem on this sub. I have been directly messaged by a mod to disengaged from discussion with a (probably) troll account. A lot of them are sponsored by reddit to simply argue with posters back-and-forth. This increases reddit's user-engagement. Thereby giv…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 02:13 PM
1

Cheating isn't biologically beneficial. It is beneficial, only under circumstances where most other pairs (>90%) are monogamous.. If everyone is cheating, people will stop practicing monogamy. And you will have society similar to other mammalian species. The male mates and forgets, and the female raises the kids alone or with a bunch of other females. The increased male-male competition then leads to highly aggressive and territorial males. This exactly a bad thing, because almost all mammalian …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 10:46 AM
1

Male only draft is not opposed by feminists.. Feminist did oppose the draft when gender-neutral draft was proposed recently. But as soon as it was kept male-only, feminists went completely silent Infant circumcision is a religious practice. And religion is founded in 'patriarchy'... So, circumcision is 'patriarchal'. I don't see feminists (who whine and cry about patriarchy all day) opposing male genital mutilation. I didn't complain about men paying 'child support'. My point was specifically ab…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 09:14 AM
2

Quote. "Voluntary termination of parenthood also typically removes the terminating parent's responsibility to support the child, as their adoptive parents will likely do so." "The court will seldom accept a voluntary termination of parental rights if an adoption is not already in the works, unless there is some sort of extreme circumstance. This is because the child has a right to support from the parent" Termination of rights is not possible unless adoptive parents are taking over. Otherwise he…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 06:51 AM
5

This a lie. And misinformation. Anybody reading this, please understand that signing-off parental responsibilities will only take your rights (as father) away. It will not absolve you of child support. The only time you wont have to pay CS, is if the child is adopted or if some other man signs-up as the father.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 06:47 AM
11

Do you think women collectively can harm a group of men who aren't even participating in dating? Are you delusional? Women can harm a man (both physically or financially) only if that man is, or at some point in past was, in a romantic relationship with her. Because other simp men would jump onto him without any evidence. If he was free and single, no woman can harm him. Any BS she cooks up will be seen as lies and she will either go to jail or mental asylum. MGTOW is the best defence against a …
/r/MensRights07/06/22 06:36 AM
1

Lets examine some of the 'toxic gender-roles culturally imposed on men'. Shall we? Male-only draft. Infant male circumcision without their consent. Expectation that men or boys will face danger and protect women/girls. Men being shamed into raising non-biological kids. Husband being forced to pay child support for non-biological kids despite DNA evidence. Height shaming, body shaming of men. Shaming of boys who choose not to pursue financial roles, instead choose what they like. (Video games, po…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 06:29 AM
1

Humans reproduction is socially engineered. In the natural world, humans might not even be monogamous if there wasn't a cultural pressure of monogamy.. (Monogamy is culturally selected for. Absent monogamy, you will have dozens of women in the tribe raising bastard kids. The increased resource burden and chaos that ensues, will lead to such society devolving into internal conflict or war. Monogamous societies survive long-term. There is no biological incentive for either gender to be monogamous.…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 06:15 AM
28

I my opinion, your son's teacher's opinion was correct. Unable to differentiate between b and d is a sign of dyslexia. Its not a mental disorder. Its just a different way our brain processes symbols. So, the boy gets confused between similar looking symbols. (Spoken language is intact)... He will require a learning assistant until he learns to adapt to his 'learning difficulty'. The teacher's judgement was spot-on. And you should also thank her for making an early diagnosis so that your son gets…
/r/MensRights06/06/22 07:32 AM
3

I am MGTOW and I agree that having 'I don't care' attitude does make you more attractive to date. But that's not the aim of MGTOW at all. The extra attention you get is actually more of an annoyance than convenience to me. Yes, I do date occasionally, but its strictly short-term. And I am honest about it. MGTOW doesn't exist because dating is difficult or risky. It exists because the end-goals of dating (LTR/kids/marriage+divorce) are all risky and unpredictable.. If your ultimate goal is beauti…
/r/MensRights06/06/22 07:13 AM
1

3rd and 4th wave feminism, in short..
/r/MensRights06/06/22 06:54 AM
2

Toxic masculinity is a sexist term invented by misandrist feminists. There is toxic behavior, regardless of gender. Its the feminists who have attached a gendered term to toxic behavior. (The same feminists who are otherwise promoting gender-neutral language in sports and UN website... Ahh! The hypocrisy)
/r/MensRights06/06/22 06:53 AM
1

MRA doesn't gaslight the world by saying its egalitarian.. You were gaslighting. So the burden is on you to prove that feminism is egalitarian. The evidence I gave, clearly shows that it isn't egalitarian. I specifically pointed at the action of taxpayer funded feminist organizations. The Indian MRA that you are willing to 'point-at' better be a taxpayer funded MRA organisation.. Pointing to fringe elements doesn't do any favor to your argument!
/r/MensRights06/06/22 05:41 AM
1

The masses have and always will be the authority as they have the power to change this control should they do please. Feminism has been in existence for over hundred years. If the masses truly wanted to make it to an egalitarian movement, they would have done it by now. Better option is to let feminism be what it is, and start another movement for mens rights. If you truly want a unified gender-equality movement, then may be you can start a third 'egalitarian' movement but, I don't think its fea…
/r/MensRights06/06/22 05:36 AM
1

They might have been. The DV case never went to trail. But JD was still labelled a 'wife beater' in a publically sponsored news paper. That's how male victims are treated in case of mutual DV cases. This case highlights it in an exemplary manner. 75-80% DV cases are reciprocal. In most of the cases, the abuse of the male partner is never recognised. JD and AH were awful to each other. But so are 80% couples with DV history.. But who gets punished more often? What does media say about DV abuse? I…
/r/MensRights03/06/22 06:54 AM
1

The law is equal to everybody. If a 20 yr woman doesn't want to get jailed for 20 years, then she shouldn't commit a crime. Instead of playing her 'gender card'.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 06:45 AM
1

https://m.timesofindia.com/india/activists-join-chorus-against-gender-neutral-rape-laws/articleshow/18840879.cms No feminism actively lobbies for anti-male biased laws. Any progress MRM makes is quickly neutralised by feminism itself..
/r/MensRights03/06/22 06:37 AM
2

Explain this. https://m.timesofindia.com/india/activists-join-chorus-against-gender-neutral-rape-laws/articleshow/18840879.cms These are govt sponsored feminist groups they are talking about!
/r/MensRights03/06/22 06:29 AM
4

So, who is the authority on feminism then? The mods or the members? The answer is obvious the ones who control the 'narrative'. These same feminists then go on other subreddits (including this subreddit) and claim that 'feminism is about equality. And we are 'mysogynist' because we don't support feminism'. The truth is that, feminism isn't about equality at all. It is about women issues (bordering on female superiority). That's the narrative on r-feminism. And pretty everywhere in mainstream med…
/r/MensRights03/06/22 06:08 AM
3

Male victims will never be believed unless he has millions to spend on a lawyer... Do you really think they care for male victims? If they did, this trial wouldn't even have existed.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 06:00 AM
8

They did settle their divorce in 2018 (for 5 millions) and walked away.. But AH's hystrionic personality came in the way. She published a 'me too' article indirectly blaming JD of abuse and he lost a lot of contracts. There was no walking away from that. Walking away also means keep your mouth shut in public.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 05:57 AM
1

No they accusations have to be done with malice, that doesn't make them necessarily untrue. If that ground is sufficient to win defamation suit, then over 50% #me too accusations would also result in millions of dollars of settlements. Its easy to prove that the allegations were made with 'malice'. But as long as they are true, they are protected as 'victims of SA'. To win you would also have to prove that allegations were false or at least without sufficient grounds. That's what JD proved in co…
/r/MensRights03/06/22 05:54 AM
0

That's exactly the mainstream feminist narrative when it comes to DV. 'That abuse is one-sided and men are always the perpetrators.' That's the narrative that has been shattered by the trial. That's why you said it would be 'damaging' to abuse victims. When in reality, 40-50% abuse victims are male, and its inconceivable how this trial is damaging to male victims.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 05:49 AM
1

I think this entire case has been nothing but damaging to any abuse victims. No. Its a blessing for the real abuse victims.. Especially male victims, who are often falsely labelled as perpetrators by their abusive (the real abuser) partners. This trail highlights a lots of flaws within our DV laws and support system.. Particularly (but not limited to) its anti-male bias.
/r/MensRights03/06/22 05:34 AM
2

https://m.timesofindia.com/india/activists-join-chorus-against-gender-neutral-rape-laws/articleshow/18840879.cms This was my moment.. They literally legalized F on M rape in India. (Its not a crime under any section). Passive inaction can still be forgiven. But feminists actively lobby for anti-male gender biased laws. VAWA and Duluth law in USA. DV law in Spain. Conscription in 50% countries.. The evidence is overwhelming!
/r/MensRights03/06/22 05:29 AM
2

If you don't know how to evaluate a scientific study, then please don't give others lectures.. The primary objective of the study was to determine whether 'therapy' plus 'financial aid' (either individually or in combination) decreases recurrent crime rates in previous criminals. It was found to reduce recurrence of crime by 50%... That's objective. There is no doubt about this result. And its a randomised controlled trial, so its a level 1B evidence. Quite stong evidence to be easily discounted…
/r/MensRights02/06/22 09:04 AM
3

Same thing was said to jews by nazi supporters. We all know how it ended!
/r/MensRights02/06/22 08:45 AM
2

Quote "By interviewing friends and relatives of each participant who died, the authors also determined the cause of death. They identified only 26 violent deaths. And even when they modeled what would happen to their results if they plugged in “good” outcomes for missing control group members and “bad” outcomes for missing treatment group members, the positive treatment effect for therapy-plus-cash largely remained." Merely 26 violent deaths doesn't mean there wasn't a reduction in crime... The …
/r/MensRights02/06/22 07:53 AM
6

Feminism is modern Nazism.. Feminism itself poses biggest threat to entire humanity, not just a bunch of school-kids.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 06:53 AM
1

They have taken it into account.. Only 26 were 'violent' deaths. Most of them died of natural causes. And even accounting for violent deaths, the positive results were still present in final evaluation. The difference was also observed in performance in 'interactive moral-choice based games' that the test subjects were evaluated upon.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 06:48 AM
4

Exactly. Alimony made perfect sense in a world where man worked and earned, and woman (daughter/wife) took care of domestic duties. In case the earning man dies or abandons her, she will be left destitute. Obviously the society didn't want a bunch of destitute women and children to feed. So, they forced the man to pay her maintainance/alimony.. In the modern world, where both man and woman have the same potential to earn, alimony makes no sense. Even if she chooses not to work, its her own choic…
/r/MensRights02/06/22 06:38 AM
10

Well, the society 'assumes' that men are 'violent' and 'rapists'... Even though 99% men aren't anything like that. What is your stance then? Should the 'society' have a better attitude or should men change their behavior? Ask yourself the question! Same yardstick applies when society 'assumes' women are liars. Now that the shoe is on other foot, it hurts, right? That's what this sub has been saying for years, and people like you still cant stop trolling. That's the irony!
/r/MensRights02/06/22 05:59 AM
1

I believe Johnny’s attorneys succeeded in getting the jury to overlook the key issue of Freedom of Speech Ah! Freedom of speech!! Something that the liberals trampled and cut in tiny pieces. After all that they have done to FoS, they have no right to hide-behind such an excuse.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 05:15 AM
2

Go and tell this to feminists who lobbied against proposed gender neutral rape law in India and got it overturned so that it still remains anti-male. https://m.timesofindia.com/india/activists-join-chorus-against-gender-neutral-rape-laws/articleshow/18840879.cms PS:- Its absolutely legal for a woman to rape an adult man in India. SA law and other sex crime related laws also use gender biased language.
/r/MensRights01/06/22 07:44 AM
1

Haven't you seen a female cat in heat? Females seeking males to mate isn't that uncommon in nature, as you or society thinks it is. Females do not even have to actively seek-out males in most cases. 92-96% mammalian species have perceptible ovulation. That means females display an easily recognisable sign during ovulation. (Pheromones, colour change of genitalia in bonobos, etc). So males do not randomly seek-out females in nature. They seek out females who are already in heat. (In contrast to c…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/22 07:34 AM
3

Because laws aren't gender neutral in half the countries.. And even where they are neutral, victims like Depp are treated as perpetrators and jailed just because of their gender... This trial highlights this FACT!. That's why feminists are complaining. Because feminism doesn't care for DV victims if they are men.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 09:31 AM
4

This 'damage control' is being done because of fear of losing a large part of their funding. This trail has highlighted male DV victims.. So, female-only DV support NGO (99% are female-only anyways) will soon have their funds diverted. This fake-sympathy is just to maintain that facade.. On ground, the leopard never changes its spots!
/r/MensRights27/05/22 07:17 AM
2

We are against intimate partner violence where women are perpetrators and men are the victims.. Feminists and mainstream media 'conveniently' neglect this subset of DV victims.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 07:09 AM
4

Imperfect victim is just another term for 'false accuser'.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 07:08 AM
3

False accusations and character assassination is a 'type' of domestic violence. And should be recognised as such... How many ex-spouses go about spreading rumours about their ex-partners? Its far too common. The only reason feminists keep it hushed-up, is because it primarily affects male-victims. (But certainly not exclusively. Plenty of women suffer from FAs too.)
/r/MensRights26/05/22 05:00 AM
1

This trial brought forward a 'new' type of domestic violence in the limelight.... 'False-accusations, slandering and character-assassination'. Something that was well-known in MRM circles, but is now open to public domain as well. Its he said-she said somewhat. But she is the one who went public about it and led to Depp's cancellation... This case highlights a lots of issues that MRM has been demanding to be fixed for decades. Its not hurting DV victims. On the contrary, its helping the victims …
/r/MensRights26/05/22 04:56 AM
3

There are plenty of women who tell the guy that 'I am on pill' and still gets pregnant. And refuses to abort. Guess what the courts do? Make the man pay CS. If this action by a govt and moral authority is fair according to you, then the men's action is way less immoral than that!
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/22 09:08 AM
3

If that was the case, porn-addiction wont be a thing. Biggest sex organ in the body is brain. If you can mimick the psychological and physical response of real sex, you can easily trick the brain into satiety. That's what porn does. And many other psychoactive drugs do. That's why they cause addiction... As technology evolves, we will have better and more realistic replacement for porn.. You really think its that difficult?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/22 08:33 AM
1

I agree! It wont be a bad thing for individual men and women. But for the society, it could be really bad. Most western societies rely on welfare system to maintain the utopia. Low birth rates means fewer taxpayers for next generation. (And an ageing population). At some point, the welfare system will collapse and will have a domino-effect on the society. How this scenario plays out is difficult to predict. But it wont be all 'sunshine' for sure. That's why a lot of govts are panicking about low…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/22 08:25 AM
2

He probably doesn't date minors.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/22 08:05 AM
1

Actually the girls who are truly 'no ONS/FWB' type aren't on dating apps. Most find relationship early and stay committed. The ones who are on dating apps are the ones regretting it. Hence put it up in their profile. But in fact, they have been doing it all their adult life, and will do it with you if you play your cards right.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/22 06:52 AM
6

Exactly this! TRP doesn't bad-mouth women. It just presents basic human nature in a straight-forward, blatant manner. Without the sugar-coating the 'society' tries to encrust upon it. At the most basic level, TRP is raw human nature. The society tries to censor it, because if the truth gets out, the utopian society we have built-upon on lies, will collapse in a few generations..
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/22 06:48 AM
-1

Sex can be replaced by technology.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/22 06:39 AM
1

Men just have to be better at living alone and taking care of themselves.. Technology will find a way to satisfy our sex needs. And you don't have to worry about kids if you dont have them in the first place... If the trend of last 2 centuries continues, the lifestyle of even the most bottom-tier men will be better than average men of today. Its just that they will be unmarried and no kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/05/22 06:37 AM
20

There is nothing you can do to get rid of the baby... Financial abortion is no going to be reality until your kid is an adult (if at all it happens). So, you will have to pay CS regardless. Your best option is to break-up with her. Ask for a at-birth DNA test, and sign the birth certificate accordingly. (If you are the bio-father). If its the latter, file for a 50-50 custody and agree for CS support. (Depending on both your income). If you aren't happy, you dont have to stay in the relationship.…
/r/MensRights24/05/22 07:41 AM
3

When you are used to 'privilege' equality seems like 'oppression'. Both, the comment you replied to and OP post, are examples where women were treated exactly 'equal'. But they didn't seem to like it!
/r/MensRights24/05/22 07:29 AM
7

Feminists have actually lobbied against gender-neutral rape/DV/other laws in various countries. They even got proposed gender neutral rape laws overturned (back to anti-male biased status), in some countries. Israel, India, are prime examples. But they are many more. https://m.timesofindia.com/india/activists-join-chorus-against-gender-neutral-rape-laws/articleshow/18840879.cms https://www.feminist.com/resources/explainer/violence-against-women-act.html This is a copy-paste of one of my recent c…
/r/MensRights24/05/22 07:23 AM
5

That's the vetting process a lot of women talk about. Those men who wait willingly are the ones worth being in LTR with... The bigger issue here is that, a lot of women have no idea how to get a man to commit without dangling 'sex' as a carrot. Most men will be ready to wait forever (even after taking the hook-up culture in account) as long the woman is genuinely 'waiting for the right man' and can show that she is 'invested' in a non-sexual manner. Men do it by being 'chivalrous'. Women have th…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/22 08:57 AM
9

In no democracy you are allowed to hang the grandson for a murder comitted by his grandfather.. So go away with your bigoted thinking.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 08:42 AM
2

Men cant walk away from child support either. Even if he was raped or the baby is not biologically his... I am, in principle, against abortion ban. But I wont fight for getting it legalized either. That's what I was told before, that men shouldn't have a say in abortion. Well, I don't have a say now. Let feminists fight it out. I'll support feminists in this if, and only if, feminists support financial abortion as well.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 06:26 PM
4

Feminists have actually lobbied against gender-neutral rape/DV/other laws in various countries. They even got proposed gender neutral rape laws overturned (back to anti-male biased status), in some countries. Israel, India, are prime examples. But they are many more. https://m.timesofindia.com/india/activists-join-chorus-against-gender-neutral-rape-laws/articleshow/18840879.cms https://www.feminist.com/resources/explainer/violence-against-women-act.html
/r/MensRights22/05/22 03:38 PM
0

Does he have a choice. He can tell her to stop. If she continues then its harassment. If he never told her no, it wouldn't be stalking. I didn't say what she is doing is correct, or ethical. But stalking is a too strong word to be used here..
/r/MensRights22/05/22 03:24 PM
2

Some jurisdictions consider even cohabitation as common-law-marriage. (Period being as short as 6 months in Canada.) So, if you want to avoid marriage, be mindful of common-law marriage too. As far as prenup is concerned, it helps if you have lots of premarital property or inheritance. Self-earned assets after marriage still come under 'communal property' so will be shared 50-50 regardless of prenup. Child custody, CS and alimony cannot be stipulated in prenup. So, yes, prenup does provide 'some…
/r/MensRights21/05/22 06:17 AM
3

Yes. A junior kissed me from behind during a office party. You will find the details if you go far enough back into my post history. Basically her (2 female) colleagues whisked her away, and apologised on her behalf. The guys were either laughing or completely oblivious to what happened. (But I am pretty sure they would have whooped my a++ if the genders were reversed.)
/r/MensRights21/05/22 06:03 AM
29

No way. And there should be a mechanism to recover any child support previously paid for that child. (I wouldn't go as far as forcing her to compensate for 'years lost/cost of upbringing'. But if CS was paid, then it should be fully refunded. with interest!)
/r/MensRights21/05/22 05:58 AM
11

Exactly! This isn't stalking. He is 'playing along'. (Although it is unclear whether he ever told her to stop.) If he is playing along, then it wouldn't be called stalking. Its stalking only if she continues harassing him even after he told her to stop.
/r/MensRights21/05/22 05:55 AM
3

Arranged by elders in the tribe. Usually the men get an 'initiation-ritual' to get assimilated into the tribe. And then they are assigned a girl. (Sometimes gets to choose, but even that is rare). The girl doesn't have much choice. She either agrees or gets abandoned by the tribe. Which is effectively a death sentence if you are a young teenage girl in the wild.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 07:44 AM
1

How is tribe cohesion going to work if all your women are basically slaves/captives? It still works. I have replied to another guy, you can go through this thread if you are interested. In tribes, coupling/marriages are often arranged by elders (who are mostly dominant male leaders). This happens just as boys and girls come-of-age. They barely have any say in it. Either they agree and stay in the tribe. Or get abandoned by the tribe. The 'arrangement' may be within same tribe or a neighbouring f…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 07:27 AM
1

Males of other species rarely approach females. They just eliminate other males and guard a large territory. (Often using violence). The females have estrous-cycle. When they come in 'heat' they seek out males and mate... Other times, they will ignore the male-approach. The male just guards its territory and mates with all females in his territory. Only 25-30% males ever pass their genes. Compared to 80% females.. Menstrual cycles (which are seen in primates) is rare in mammalian kingdom. The ma…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 07:18 AM
2

The scenario I described is the extreme one... But even in the most common scenario, men do not 'approach' or 'woo' women. This behavior in very well documented in still surviving remote tribes. If left in wilderness, human often form small tribes, of a few hundreds strong. Often led by a bunch of dominant and experienced men. The marriages/coupling within tribe is often arranged by the elders even before the boys and girls are teenagers. They don't get a 'say' in it. Sometimes marriages can occ…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 07:11 AM
5

That's too much of an idealized scenario. In the real tribal world, men never 'approached women'. They just barged-in, killed off all the men and boys in the tribe, and then, raped and enslaved all the women. Those women who resisted, were also killed. That's why human societies have always been patriarchal. Because you need strong men to protect your tribe from invasion. Men approaching women is a complete 'social-conditioning', which got popular fairly recently with the advent of literature an…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 09:21 AM
2

There is a difference between medical procedure and mutilation. Removing someone's appendix because they developed appendicitis is a 'medical procedure'. (Irrespective of age) But removing someone's healthy appendix just to prevent a future episode of appendicitis is butchery. And when its done to non-consenting infants, its mutilation.. Appendix is also a vestigial organ. But we don't remove it in all infants unless it develops a problem. When the procedure is justified...
/r/MensRights17/05/22 05:57 AM
6

All circumcision is not genital mutilation. Only when its done to infant and juvenile boys does it become MGM. Circumcision of consenting adult men is equivalent to elective labiaplasty. Both should be legal and voluntary.
/r/MensRights17/05/22 05:51 AM
3

Prostitution is called the 'oldest profession'. Some of the historical scriptures, thousands of years old, are dedicated to porn. (Kamasutra). All this happened even before capitalism was invented.. So, much for feminist propaganda!
/r/MensRights16/05/22 08:04 AM
7

Its not about what you like and what you don't. Some people like puffed-up lips, they can go to a plastic surgeon and get a lip-job. There is nothing wrong in that. Its a cosmetic procedure. Anyone can get it done. As long as they are consenting adult. That's the key! Circumcision is effectively a cosmetic procedure. So, any adult man can get circumcised, even for religion reasons. Nobody cares!. What we are against is infant circumcision. (That's what we call MGM). There is nothing wrong with a…
/r/MensRights16/05/22 08:00 AM
2

The attrition rates of girls and boys dropping out from school is pretty similar. The most significant factor for school-attrition is poverty. (Not gender) The govt has already taken care of that by providing free education upto 10th grade under right to education act. The reason a lot of girls do not persue college education after 18 yrs, is due to early marriage. The legal age of marriage in India is 18 for girls. The govt is trying to raise it to 21 (to make it at par with boys). Guess who is…
/r/MensRights16/05/22 07:25 AM
7

Men invented more than women because men are willing to die for their inventions.. 28 men died in different accidents attempting powered-flight. Eventually the Wright brothers built upon that knowledge to build the first aeroplane. The lessons they learnt were written in the blood of the men who came before them. Women invent things less often because they do not take equal amount of risks. The first woman scientist to get nobel prize (Madam Curie) also died from leukemia caused by radiation. (S…
/r/MensRights16/05/22 07:13 AM
1

In UK it is.. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2022/04/16/staring-tube-could-prosecuted-says-top-detective/#:~:text=Staring%20on%20the%20London%20Underground,(BTP)%20officer%20has%20said. The original post is from UK too.
/r/MensRights13/05/22 05:48 PM
3

Sexual harassment of men at workplace is a MRM issue. What defines SA is a whole different matter.. If staring is SA, then calling someone 'bald c**t' certainly qualifies as SA. Be careful what you wish for feminists!
/r/MensRights13/05/22 07:34 AM
2

No.. Its equivalent to calling a woman 'a fat c**t' which technically would still qualify a sexual harassment. I don't agree with the judgement, but that's where our society is heading right now. Just enjoy the decline!
/r/MensRights13/05/22 07:27 AM
21

0.4 per million kms chance of dying in car crash in USA. 50% chance of getting a divorce in USA. Now you do the math about which risk is greater. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Monthly-crash-rates-crashes-per-million-vehicle-km-and-average-number-of-casualties-per_fig2_284903283
/r/MensRights13/05/22 07:17 AM
8

Exactly this! Make-up is a result of women-to-women competition. And I think it results mainly because women are socialized to act passively in dating. That means, the man is the one usually 'asking-out'. So, a woman needs to stand-out from the crowd in order to be 'asked out'. Whereas men do the asking out, so they need to be better at 'communication skills' and 'confidence' in addition to being attractive too.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 01:00 PM
9

The article is based on a university funded study. OP isn't saying that women evade taxes deliberately... He is pointing out to the FACT that the welfare system, in general, is structured in a way that benefits women way more than it does to men. There are more homeless men than women, but the homeless shelters give priority to women and children. Same thing was done when COVID-related unemployment benefits were announced. Women and single-mom were top of the priority... The War aid and disaster…
/r/MensRights09/05/22 12:43 PM
8

Unmarried men earn less than married men, but they also receive less welfare benefits than any other group... 'Net taxes' refers to total taxes paid minus any govt benefits received in-return. Unmarried men hardly receive any welfare. But unmarried women, especially single mothers, receive a lot of benefits. So, men overall (both married as well as unmarried) pay more 'net taxes' than women.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 12:36 PM
3

As u/Play_Muted as said, both men and women secrete oxytocin and dopamine after sex. Its just that the ratio differs in the two genders. Women secrete them at ~50-50 ratio. Whereas men do at ~80-20 ratio. (With dopamine being predominant). So, whereas women can bond more easily with partner, men need to have frequent sex with same partner to get bonded. That's why women generally report lower satisfaction with casual sex than men do. (Although both genders aren't fully satisfied with casual sex …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 10:10 AM
9

Divorce rate is ~50%... Half of the men who marry get divorced and reach their old age alone anyways.. But they lose 50% of their assets and retirement savings in the process. Those men who go MGTOW will probably reach the same state a typical divorced man reaches, but will have 50% extra money than he would otherwise have had. Isn't a bad deal, if you ask me.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 09:36 AM
10

https://lulz.com/its-true-only-men-pay-tax/ This is a study done in New Zealand, but pretty much resembles what you would expect in America.. Its not only that women pay less taxes over their lifetimes, but also they receive more welfare/insurance benefits over their lifetime.. So, men are net 'payers' and women are net 'recievers' of taxes.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 09:25 AM
1

That's pretty much what happened to feminism too... But it doesn't seem to get the same hate. Does it?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 09:12 AM
3

Enforcement is a different issue. She can still deny to pay CS. In that case, he will have to petition the court for unpaid CS. The court will then order her employer to garnish her salary. Because she is a high-earner, this can be done easily. What the courts wont do is put her in jail. This happens when the man has been ordered to pay CS but refuses or isn't employed/earns under-table. If a woman does the latter, she wont be jailed or have to pay. But a person earning valid salary, will just g…
/r/MensRights09/05/22 04:28 AM
1

More than that, I hope the father gets to see the child before its too late. If a reasonable time has passed after adoption, the father wont be able get the child back, even with DNA test. There is already a precedence regarding such a case. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/07/paternity-registry/396044/
/r/MensRights09/05/22 04:24 AM
1

Ya.. That's what I fear! That's why I said, he needs to take 'specific' steps. Its (putative father's registry) something that feminists deliberately hide from getting any publicity. The only reason its maintained is to shrug-off legal responsibility in case the bio-father sues the adoption agency at a later date. The aim of maintaining the registry is to skip legal liabilities, not to help fathers.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 04:17 AM
2

The OP poster hasn't mentioned anything about their gender/ sexual orientation/ or personal sexual life.. There is nothing to suggest that they are 'incel'.. As per that word, they would have to be celibate. No such information is available in the OP.
/r/MensRights09/05/22 04:10 AM
3

The term 'misogynist' has now become synonymous with 'anti-feminist'. But there is a major difference between the two.. Anti-feminist is someone who disagrees with political and financial policies of feminism. He may not necessarily hate women. But feminists use that term to silence anyone who opposes them. Even when he has many valid points. Its now a silencing static to silence opposition to feminism. No different from how Nazis did to jews.
/r/MensRights08/05/22 10:12 AM
15

Honestly speaking, she got roasted there in the comment thread. (A lot of down-voted comments have been removed, so idk what they had said.) There is very little chance for her to escape CS. The father knows she is pregnant, and he will come after the child. If she tries to escape CS, it will only make her look bad infront of the family court judge. She will anyways pay CS, but the more she resists, the more she will end-up paying.
/r/MensRights08/05/22 10:08 AM
91

She cant escape CS.. If he registers in putative father registry, he will still be notified of the child anonymously.. He can then choose to take the DNA test and if proven father, he will be able to halt the adoption proceedings. This will put the mother in a terrible position.. Safe heaven laws aren't designed for mother to put the baby away from 'willing father'... If he is the proven father, (she will have to declare that either she doesn't know the father or father is unwilling), she will b…
/r/MensRights08/05/22 09:46 AM
1

True, but there's no way to examine that There is a way to examine that. Take out no-fault divorce and bring back at-fault divorce. And introduce a 5 percentage point penalty (against the final settlement) for each fault. Those who want no-fault divorce can still do so, but endure a 5-10% penalty too. This way, couple will be forced to take their marriage vows seriously. Instead of running-away at the first sign of trouble.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 05:21 AM
2

Ah! You described a typical male-feminist. Now you why I have zero respect for male-feminists? Just go through this post to get an answer.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 05:14 AM
2

A lot BC methods are already covered. And the feminists will make sure that the list keeps increasing. As far as male BC methods go... They would always be cheaper than 18 years of child support. So, no BC can be 'too expensive' for a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 04:51 AM
15

I agree. The Japanese birth-rate issue is more complicated than just 'men helping out at home'. Gender-roles in Japanese community are strictly enforced. The man has to surrender almost his entire salary to wife, who has the responsibility to spend it on family. (Not just kids, but elderly parents, and more). With ageing population, these roles are tough and toxic to either genders. The reason hikkimori men (herbivore men) is so common because their culture enforces politeness. So, you wpn't see…
/r/MensRights07/05/22 01:40 PM
2

Unlikely. BC methods will remain fully legal. Male BC pill and other temporary methods (VASAgel) are also on thr horizon. BC methods will never go away.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 01:28 PM
1

Chivalry is a gender neutral term... The basic human decency (I mentioned above) is expected from all 'humans' not just men-only. Its not that women are so weak that they cant help an old man or a little boy.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 01:24 PM
2

Wrong! It wont affect men at all.. Yes, in the long-run, our demands like financial abortion, and legal revocation of paternity if proven by DNA negative test, will have lower chances of succeeding. But to think that abortion laws will take away any rights from men is absurd. Men never had any abortion right to begin with. You can't lose something you don't have.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 01:16 PM
1

As long your definition is gender-neutral. Chivalry in practice, implies men doing a favor towards women (usually but not exclusively women). The same standards of chivalry aren't applied equally to both genders (paying for dates for example.). Your definition applies to 'general politeness' expected from every person. But when you apply dating practices to it, it becomes a toxic gender- norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 10:27 AM
2

'Good person' is a gender-neutral term. Chivalry implies that men should serve women and women are 'entitled' to get favours from men. (Although the original meaning of Chivalry had nothing to do with women). Its simply a sexist term that infantizes women and enforces gender norms on men. I think our society has progressed far beyond for it to be of any relevance.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 10:21 AM
2

The problem is that some people feel 'entitled' to this general politeness. Holding the door open, paying for dates or helping someone carry a heavy load are kind gestures. Its nice if someone does it for it.... That's politeness. But when people start thinking that they are entitled to such 'kindness' that is when it becomes toxic social norm.. That's what modern Chivalry is. A toxic gender- norm which is incompatible with gender-equality.. General politeness is expected from everyone. Even wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 10:11 AM
3

No. Being a polite person specifically for women is 'simping'. Having basic human decency is expected from both genders.. So, if you kind show gestures for random people, you are a good person. But if you do it for women, while trashing men, then you are a simp. Eg: If you think you should help a lady carry a heavy load, then you should do the same even for a man. (Old man, homeless man, teenage boy, etc). That's chivalry. (Helping the weak and needy). It doesn't mention gender specifically, eve…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 07:43 AM
2

That includes you I suppose.. I don't agree with you, so your statement doesn't include me.. But it includes you, assuming you agree with your own statement..
/r/MensRights06/05/22 07:03 AM
14

Trolls don't get chivalry.. They get a reality-check!
/r/MensRights06/05/22 06:58 AM
13

Does she appreciate the women who makes sandwiches for their husbands? Does she appreciate women who give-up their 'careers' to be a SAHM? Gender-roles look bad on either side of gender. Feminism doesn't appreciate it when women make the choices which conforms to feminine gender-roles.. So should it be when it comes to male-gender roles.. Even if men do voluntarily, it is still part of the 'social-construct' and an example of internalised misandry. (The male equivalent of internalised misogyny- …
/r/MensRights06/05/22 06:57 AM
1

I don't have to 'assume' what feminists are. I KNOW WHAT THEY ARE. Last time I gave you evidence of how feminists lobbied against proposed 'gender-neutral rape law' in different countries. (And got it overturned in a few of them). I know how 'pro mens rights' you are anyways... Thanks for concern trolling. Now go back to your feminist subreddit and post a screenshot of my comment. (On the plus-side it may give food-for-thought to some moderate ones)
/r/MensRights05/05/22 04:49 PM
1

Feminists were opposing it. They lost because they do not have enough simp-politicians to support them. Feminism has always been supported by simp-men throughout history.. That is its primary 'power source'. It losing its steam is as sign that its running out of simp-supply. As it runs out of male support, it loses its steam. (Technically its still not a win for mens rights.. That's why I said its a neutral thing. Not necessarily a good thing for MRM)
/r/MensRights05/05/22 04:16 PM
4

Why should women support our rights if we don't support theirs? That is exactly the reason why the SCOTUS ruling got passed. Because men are now refusing to support women. That's what happens when feminism demonized men for decades. 90% women don't support MRM anyways. So nothing will change for MRM. Don't worry about us!
/r/MensRights04/05/22 07:01 PM
5

Feminists will never ally with MRAs.. There is nothing to ally with them. Let them fight for women's rights and let MRAs fight for mens rights..
/r/MensRights04/05/22 06:57 PM
2

One of the main reasons the SCOTUS ruling went through was because feminism is losing a significant portion of men's support. But the feminists wont learn. They will double-down on their efforts on demonizing men and calling it 'male-privilege'. The ruling is a backwards step for MRM too, but I don't think it will have any effect on men's right issues anyways.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 06:54 PM
8

The SCOTUS ruling is a backwards step for MRM. This will further weaken our stance on financial abortion. Its not that we were anywhere close to getting it, but we at least had a valid demand. The SCOTUS ruling will further harm basic MRA demands too.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 06:50 PM
1

People still have dozens of option to avoid pregnancy even today. So, the casual sex rate will not decrease even if abortion is banned. People will just become responsible with BC methods.. (Which is good thing in my opinion).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 10:30 AM
0

Do you have any idea how greeks used to perform abortions? Most ancient abortions involved surgical extraction or inserting 'herbs' into the uterus.. Both were dangerous and potentially fatal procedures. (Before antibiotics and bacterial sterilization techniques invented.) But casual sex was still fairly common despite of the risks. Casual sex is a result of natural sexual desires of both sexes. It has nothing to do with abortion. The idea that women will suddenly become 'chaste' because there i…
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 10:28 AM
1

That's why he is your BF. If he was earning twice as much as you, he would have been your husband. (Assuming he is foolish enough to marry in todays times).
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 10:17 AM
0

Men date down all the time. So, 9/10 men can date 6/10 or 7/10.. That's why men who are bottom 20% are almost always without a partner. Because the bottom 20% women wouldn't date them anyways. And men who are 20-50th percentile are usually okay with dating such women.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 10:16 AM
1

https://www.kiplinger.com/personal-finance/603298/women-who-make-more-than-their-husbands-should-watch-out Divorce rate go up by 50% if wife is the breadwinner. https://www.businessinsider.com/research-shows-women-more-likely-get-divorced-after-promotion-2020-2 Promotion almost doubles the risk of divorce. But only wife's promotion.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 10:12 AM
3

No he cant, coz he has sold his balls to the feminists... LOL!
/r/MensRights04/05/22 09:50 AM
4

The issue is that, half of those 95% rapists are women who rape other men (and boys). But these same feminists protect these 'rapists' by lobbying for gender-biased rape laws.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 09:24 AM
1

And around half of those 95% rapists are women. Against whom, there is not even a law that criminalizes female-rapists.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 09:22 AM
5

Women had a choice to fight for survival too.. Fighting for survival is a choice... If you lose you are killed. That's what happens in war. Women were raped, men were killed. Both are equally bad. Gengis Khan was an oppressor, no doubt. But he oppressed all his opponents, not just women. You are giving only one side of history that suits your narrative. Truth is that, both men and women were oppressed by dictators throughout history. Women do not have a 'monopoly' at being the victims of oppress…
/r/MensRights04/05/22 09:17 AM
3

'Oppression' means being forced to fight a war against your will. Oppression means being forced to pay child support to a kid not biologically yours. Oppression means being for to pay CS to your rapist. Now take your calculator and figure-out how many women have been 'oppressed'.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 09:11 AM
2

Without draft, most countries wouldn't have the confidence to start a war.. Look at the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Most of the Russian soldiers are draftees. Do you think Russia would have started the conflict if they didn't have draft? How confident would they have been? Military draft leads to more wars, not less wars... As far as 'needing a draft if your country is invaded' argument goes, I call it BS. Modern military weapons are too complex to be operated by a rookie-draftee... Imagine the dan…
/r/MensRights04/05/22 09:03 AM
21

Do you really think women care about 'abortions' while having casual sex? No. They only care about their 'tingles'. Men and women will have casual sex as long as humanity persists. Casual sex was fairly common even before birth control and abortions were available. They became 'legal' much later.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 08:03 AM
0

If all women are with people more attractive than them who tf are 10/10 women going to date? The men who are attractive+rich.. (Eg. Sportstars)... This isn't even surprising if you see the GFs of most rich superstars.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 07:55 AM
0

Women value looks as much as men do. Its just that they aren't very truthful about it. If you ask a woman what kind of man she likes, she will say combination of funny, confident, responsible, ambitious, etc. What she doesn't tell you, is that, she likes all these qualities in a men she already finds 'attractive'. If the man isn't 'attractive enough', he stands no chance. Unless he can compensate his 'lack of attraction' with money. Which is the only other substitute. No other quality will compe…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 07:48 AM
1

They compared the incomes in the same dating pool. So, if they took the average of NY career women income, then they must have also compared it to average NY men's income. Who also earn higher than average american men. Yes, I agree that single, childless women (the study population I guess) earn similar to men. The keyword here is 'similar'.. Its highly unlikely that they earn 58% more than their NY male-counterparts.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 07:40 AM
1

We are generally welcoming of women here. The only ones who get hostile treatment are the ones who identify as 'feminists'.(regardless of their gender). There is a general distrust towards feminists within MRAs. Although, the reason is multifactorial, but the main cause is because feminism actively undermines men's issues and downplays them. The original men's movement was the mens liberation movement. (Not the subreddit, i am talking about the 1980s mens lib movement). Feminists quickly overtoo…
/r/MensRights03/05/22 06:25 AM
3

Actually we all should be thankful to FDS subreddit for helping men see the real face of modern dating. The kind of girl you encountered on OKC were dime-a-dozen even before FDS came into existence.. But now we all know how to identify such manipulators. Hopefully more men will see it and avoid manipulation and trouble of online dating.
/r/MensRights03/05/22 06:13 AM
1

Considering the 'gender-pay gap' the average men in their pool probably earns 17% more than these women anyways. 58% higher than those men actually translates into ~175-180% of the average income of these women. Unless you agree that the 'eligible men' in their dating pool actually earn less than these women. (Which is highly unlikely).
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 06:07 AM
1

So it makes a prenup virtually useless in over 75% of divorce disputes.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 06:03 AM
2

The marriages where husband makes significantly more than wife has actually lower divorce rates.. I know that everyone 'settles'. But the divorce rates go up only when woman 'settles'. But not when men do. That's the difference!
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 05:21 AM
4

Prenup cannot waive-off alimony anyways. It also cannot protect assets acquired after marriage. Child support and custody also cannot be specified in prenup.. This makes a prenup virtually useless in over 75% of divorce disputes. (which center around custody and CS/alimony in majority of cases).
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/22 04:51 PM
4

https://www.nypost.com/2019/09/06/broke-men-are-hurting-american-womens-marriage-prospects/ Quote. "They found that a woman’s made-up hubby makes 58 percent more money than the current lineup of eligible bachelors." Women want hubby to make 58% more.. That's far from 'at least as much as she does'. Some women do marry men who earn less, but that makes her feel she 'settled' for him. Marriages where women earn more have higher divorce rates. And if she gets a promotion, this rates further goes-up…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/22 04:47 PM
1

The original pay-gap data published in 1977, compared the 'average' salaries of full-time male vs female employees.. It did not account for the difference in jobs, hours worked, overtime and experience of employees. And it still came to about 20%. If you match the above confounding factors, you will find that women actually earn 3-5% more than men. (As discovered by Google). There is no wage gap. Earnings gap exists because men and women choose different fields and subcategories within the same …
/r/MensRights02/05/22 02:47 PM
8

There is a difference between under-reported. And unpunished. What we are saying is that domestic violence and sexual abuse against men (by women) goes unpunished even when reported. And often the man is put in jail, by default, until there is evidence against his partner. (Who was the actual perpetrator)
/r/MensRights02/05/22 07:34 AM
1

Your word 'relationship' is very vague in your question.. Will I have 'relationship' with someone I will never have or had sex with? Absolutely!! I have relationships with my father, mother, 2 sisters a few best buddies I never had sex with, nor am I planning to. Nearly 90% people a normal person has relationship with in his lifetime, they wont have sex with anyways.. But if you asking whether I'll have a romantic relationship with someone, then by definition it should involve sex.. Otherwise it…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/05/22 05:12 AM
24

That's your problem right here! You are ready to donate your hard-earned money for 'helping battered women' but then come here to troll on one of the few subreddits which helps 'battered men'. We aren't even asking for your money. Just to show solidarity with abused men.. But alas, you dont have the 'balls' to stand-up for men (including yourself)... No wonder male-feminists need medications for erection. Coz they don't even have 'balls to stand-up for themselves'. (Pun intended!)
/r/MensRights01/05/22 06:31 PM
2

Better option.. Do not have a fiance or cohabitation partner at all.. I work 8-9 hrs/day.. Do cleaning and cooking all by myself.. And still have 1 hr for gym and 2 hrs for video games... Honestly, with modern gadgets, you don't really need someone to do housework for you.. Housework being such-a-burden is a classic feminist myth. Its just a scaring tactic to tell men that they 'need' women. (Newsflash! You don't!).
/r/MensRights01/05/22 06:20 PM
3

If you aren't getting equal pay, then may be you are not working hard enough... Or work in a poorly paid specialization.. May be you should change your job instead of ranting here on reddit!
/r/MensRights01/05/22 06:14 PM
5

I think there should be a statutory limit for financial abortion, the same way there is one for medical termination. (I think its 24 weeks in USA depending on state). So, financial abortion should have 2-3 weeks lower than the limit for medical abortion. This way, the mother gets sufficient time to consider whether she wants to abort or continue the pregnancy knowing that she will be a single mother.. As this choice is hers, it will also be her sole responsibility..
/r/MensRights29/04/22 06:55 AM
3

I think at present we should focus on the right of non-biological fathers (paternity fraud victims) and male-rape victims to revoke paternity and not pay child support. This demand is much more reasonable and has a high likelihood of being accepted by the society. Once that is achieved, we can demand financial abortions. In a society where male rape victims are ordered child support, the odds of financial abortion being passed as law are next to nil.
/r/MensRights29/04/22 06:47 AM
1

Women's cosmetic products are more expensive because you can literally fool women into buying things they don't need or use, by simply making a fancy advertisement.. To sell men a product, you need to have some substance. Nivea men and Nivea women both are equally ineffective, but women flock to buy them by seeing some fancy ad. Men don't. Thereby decreasing the demand and driving-down the prices. Simple demand and supply economics buddy!
/r/MensRights29/04/22 06:05 AM
13

They were criminals and should be treated as such.. I don't think feminism taught them to be sexual predators... The problem is feminists (including you) are trying to defend sexual predators here. Just because they are girls.. That's why feminism gets the blame. Feminism isn't responsible for their crime. (The same way patriarchy isn't responsible for any crime comitted by men). Feminism is responsible for defending their (girls') crime. Criminals are responsible for their own actions.
/r/MensRights29/04/22 05:59 AM
4

It makes her a 'no prospect' which technically is a bad prospect if you are on a date with her.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/22 09:19 AM
1

Its not about self-esteem. A lot of men are shamed if they act assertively. If he ends a date because he thinks she isn't interested, there is a good chance she will put-up a social media post about him slandering his name and dating profile. And everyone will blame him to be the villain. As a bonus, he will get a few death-threats and rape-threats too.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/22 09:17 AM
5

If its the latter, than its outside the company's jurisdiction anyways.. Its the duty of cops to catch him drunk-driving if he is returning from a pvt party.. None of the business of the company.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 07:12 AM
15

One of the main reason these things are happening is because more and more women are paying alimony. So, they are now putting barriers for 'men' from getting alimony. Same goes for 50-50 custody.. Once enough men start becoming SAHDs or take time-off work for their kids.. The preference given to the 'primary parent' in custody will disappear. Just watch-out for it.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 07:08 AM
1

Okay, because you actually said different in hour original comment, but you probably meant sex anyways. Ya I agree I made a mistake.. Even the study I linked was done in Asian men, so idk how representative it is. Asian women are usually less height-obsessed than western women. (So, it may have a different result if done in western men). But the longietivity in short men is an established fact. We how do you think we fix this? I already suggested how to do it. Better support to men in family cou…
/r/MensRights28/04/22 06:34 AM
5

Biased raped laws and DV laws are passed by govt and often lobbied by feminists (VAWA for example)... This is the very definition of 'organized assault' on mens rights.. If you are so concerned, why don't you lobby for gender-neutral laws? Why feminists are so scared of gender neutral laws? If all women are 'innocent', no woman should fear neutral laws. After all, laws do not punish 'innocent' people. Or do they?
/r/MensRights28/04/22 06:17 AM
3

MRA is reactionary to feminism lobbying for gender-biased rape and DV laws like VAWA. Mens liberation movement was the original branch of feminism that tried to raise these issues. But the other feminists silenced them and drove them into oblivion. That's why MRA was born. And the only reason it survives is because of its anti-feminism stance. Otherwise feminists would have done the same to MRA as what they did to mens liberation movement.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 06:13 AM
2

Actual feminism is fine. Actual feminists lobbied for gender-biased rape laws in several countries and opposed proposed gender neutral rape and DV laws. (Including in Australia). Which part for this is fine?
/r/MensRights28/04/22 06:10 AM
1

https://scientificscarsdalian.org/846/health/do-short-people-actually-live-longer/#:~:text=Researchers%20have%20also%20found%20that,who%20played%20between%201946%2D2010. https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/health-and-families/health-news/short-men-are-likely-to-live-longer-because-they-carry-the-longevity-gene-scientists-reveal-9356759.html https://www.joe.co.uk/amp/sex/short-men-have-more-sex-according-to-science-307903 Short men living longer is a scientifically established fact. The othe…
/r/MensRights28/04/22 04:31 AM
1

I think MRM has way bigger issues to deal with that heightism.. Biased rape and SA laws, violation of due processes for male victims of SA as well as false allegations, paternity fraud, genital mutilation, draft and biased family courts and marriage laws.. Male suicide is a blanket issue, that covers your hieghtism. However, height isn't even among top 10 reasons for male suicide. (Financial pressure and relationship breakdown are the top two). In fact, studies show that short men actually live …
/r/MensRights28/04/22 03:29 AM
2

As u/KDulius has said, we don't judge people for what is there between their legs (that's what feminists do). We judge people for what is there between their ears. Your ideas matter. Not your gender. And its clear we don't agree with your ideas..
/r/MensRights28/04/22 03:17 AM
1

He is a troll. I just taunted him with his own line of attack... Read his reply to my comment... Since when MRM became a sexual-liberation movement? MRM is about equal rights to men. You can do whatever legal within those rights, as long as the rights are equal to both genders..
/r/MensRights28/04/22 03:11 AM
1

MRM is about freeing men from traditional gender-roles.. That includes roles imposed on men in 1960s and on both sides of that period. It has nothing to do with sexual dynamics.. Feminism is about sexual dynamics, not MRM. We want equal rights, that it. As long as both genders have equal rights, they can do whatever that is legal. People who break the law should be punished after due process in the court.
/r/MensRights28/04/22 03:09 AM
1

How it will solve the two issues I described?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/22 02:38 AM
0

If you haven't had sex, you technically qualify as 'incel'.... This sub is for MRAs. I do have sympathy for incels, but this discussion isn't very relevant to you. I think.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 02:36 AM
9

Women are definitely on our side. Feminists??? Not even a chance. Not even if their life depends on it.. No feminist can be of MRM side, not even a male-feminist.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 02:10 AM
9

He didn't say 'females'. Get over your delusion!
/r/MensRights27/04/22 02:08 AM
11

I tried working with feminists... Guess what?!! IT FAILED. The same feminists then opposed a gender-neutral rape law in my country and lobbied to get the gendered language back. (Govt sponsored organizations. Not random radical feminists). You cannot work with feminists. They do not support equal rights for men. That fact is not gonna change.
/r/MensRights26/04/22 07:33 AM
3

The only issue I have with your post is with your stance of trying to 'convince' feminists.. See bud, feminism hates men who ask for equal rights.. Whether feminists accept that or try to sugar-coat it or justify it by giving historical (or third world country) excuse, depends to on type of feminist you are dealing with. But at the end of the day, we have nothing to prove to feminists.. They will never accept that men deserve equal rights. Our job is to convince the society. And if the society a…
/r/MensRights26/04/22 07:25 AM
1

But you still wont have a solution that works.... Either hypergamy is false or men should never marry.. There is no middle way. The laws will always remain in women's favour... I didn't even say anything against women yet. (Only accepted hypergamy which you seem to agree with too). But my 'solution' still makes sense. You don't have to hate women to come to that conclusion. You just have to accept two things. 1. Women always prefer a 'better' man. Not equal man. (Hypergamy). 2. If marriage or LT…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/22 06:30 AM
2

OP is going to be signing the birth certificate. Which is a legal document... Mere 'trust' is not enough to sign a legal document.. Once signed paternity cannot be revoked.. Once you bring legality into the matter, you are bringing the govt into your personal life. Even if OP trusts his wife, he still has zero reason to trust the govt... So, if you are signing a legal document, you have every right to double and triple-check. Nothing to do with his wife.. This is between the state and OP. and th…
/r/MensRights26/04/22 06:22 AM
1

Yes. But also I don’t believe traditional marriage is practiced that much. Yes, but laws still treat marriage along traditional lines... In a world where women are breadwinners 40% of times, how else do you explain men paying alimony 93% of times. And child support 85-90% times. 46% of non-custodial women default on child support vs 27% non-custodial men. Men are also 50% less likely to get CS even when they are the custodial father. As I said, the laws are and will remain gynocentric. There is …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 02:40 PM
1

MGTOW in simplest form means to avoid LTR and marriage. Which is the logical outcome of accepting the raw female nature + gynocentric laws.. You yourself accepted that you hate them. Talking about it and warning other men is not bitching.. But the society will never accept men who tell the truth and warn others, offering the only solution that actually works.. Why? Because their solution works. Do you have any better solution? then please suggest.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 01:50 PM
1

I agree. The problem is that the traditional model of marriage itself is obsolete. It made sense when women were not allowed to work or didn't have adequate work opportunities. But in a world where women are competing (and even preferred over men) in workplaces, the traditional model becomes a burden on the sole-earner... And when such a marriage breaks apart, the 'breadwinner' is the one who loses everything. Including custody of his kids. This is what that gives marriage it's bad name. Its not…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 01:36 PM
2

'Tradition' also explains women doing majority of child care and housework. Then why people on this subreddit are so against it? So 'tradition' is ok when it benefits women. But if it benefits men, its a 'patriarchal' problem and 'oppression'. Isnt it?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 01:20 PM
2

First dates usually sets up the tone for the relationship.. Obviously there is no study on 'second' and 'third' dates.. But most people here are experienced enough to tell that men pay on majority of dates (above 75% easily). If women earn almost same as men, it still doesn't explain the discrepancy.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 01:13 PM
20

Knowing the paternity of your child is the right of every father. (Also its the right of the child to know their bio-father). This alone is a good enough reason.. Stop shaming men who ask for proof of paternity.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 01:06 PM
18

If you are the 'legal' father of the child, you don't need the mother's consent to do DNA test. So you can easily get it done secretly... But beware that it will eventually come out and may have irreversible implications on your marriage. Ideally, this should be discussed around the same time you guys plan for baby. (Assuming its a planned baby). But anyways, now you do what calms your nerves. But it may have unforseen results...
/r/MensRights25/04/22 01:02 PM
6

I am not in support of such a future... I'll be happy with a future where marriage has become completely obsolete. And both men and women are free to persue the kind of relationships they want. There is no pressure on anybody to have relationships at all. And singlehood is celebrated in men, as much as it is done in women.. Of course, women can choose to fight wars or surrender whatever they prefer. Who cares? If enemies invade a country, its highly unlikely they will invade it for men, anyways.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 12:57 PM
1

Less than 25% of members of Menslib are men. How can a group focussed on 'mens rights' do not even have adequate male-representation?
/r/MensRights25/04/22 08:27 AM
2

We don't live in 'history'. We live in present. And presently men are more oppressed than women. Nobody has the right to punish grandson for the crimes of the grandfather. The 'historical oppressors' are all dead. The present generation of men have no role in historical oppression. So, justifying present ill treatment of men by society for some 'historical' reasons is pure misandry. And bigotry. Nothing justifies bigotry
/r/MensRights25/04/22 08:23 AM
-1

Go and tell this to Will Smith whom these feminists are celebrating.
/r/MensRights25/04/22 08:10 AM
1

This surely rules-out Will Smith (point#1) whom all feminists are celebrating so much. So much for feminist hypocrisy!!
/r/MensRights25/04/22 08:09 AM
1

I said 50-50 contribution. Where did ypu read I don't want to contribute. I don't have problem with paying 100% for dating too. I have enough extra cash... The problem is with cohabitation or marriage. There is a difference between some money for fun and paying half of your income and assets.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 07:30 AM
2

Ok explain how men can commit 'maternity fraud'?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 08:57 AM
2

'Manipulation is not a bad thing' when it happens to men. That is what you mean. If this manipulation was directed towards women, the whole society would have been up-in-arms about it... There would have been marches and protests to get laws passed against such manipulators. And any man who tried to speak against it would have been blamed for 'masplaining' or 'toxic masculinity'. But just because it happens to men, you have the freedom to call it a 'good thing'.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 08:19 AM
5

They acknowledge these facts, but don't really accept them. There is a whole group of RP guys that acknowledges this fact and go their own way. The problem is that society still hates them. Accepting RP facts wholeheartedly only leads to one logical outcome-- MGTOW! There is no way you can change female-nature. And the laws will always remain gynocentric to protect the female drive for hypergamy.. That means men who engage with woman on any long-term level will stand to lose big when she jumps t…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 08:09 AM
4

Then how do you explain the numbers where 80-85% men pay child support. And 93-95% alimony payers are men? If they were earning 50-50 during marriage, why only men pay alimony and CS after divorce? Even in 50-50 custody scenario.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:05 AM
5

https://www.money.com/valentines-day-men-pay-first-date Well this study proves otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 07:03 AM
8

Better option is for men to not marry at all... That's what most men say on the internet.. 'Do not marry. Marriage is a bad deal'. Men are not desperate. The falling marriage rates over last 3-4 decades tells a very different story. Men are learning. Its just that the momentum built-up by religious and cultural influence has allowed marriage to still remain a desirable option.. But in just 2 generations, marriage rates are already below 50% and falling. Its just a matter of another generation or…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 04:50 AM
3

How many women paid 50% for the dates? If women earn almost equal amount, then why do 90% of them still expect the man to pay? And why would he think the situation would be any different after marriage? If you paying nearly everything during dating process, its likely that you will pay for everything after marriage too. She will just save-up her money and bail once she has saved enough.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 04:38 AM
1

So, in short, women are given free the same services that men have to fight the authorities for. And there is still a possibility of you being rejected or directed to another place where a sub-optimal service is being provided. If one gender has to jump through hoops to get services which other gender gets by-default, then how is not violation of their human rights?
/r/MensRights24/04/22 03:02 AM
2

POSCO (anti pedophilia law) in India is gender neutral. (Made so in 2019). Being the older person, the girl is presumed guilty under POSCO act... But the gynocentric police and feminist activists have put the blame on the boy.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 02:54 AM
1

Working for money is slavery then. /s
/r/MensRights24/04/22 02:33 AM
2

Organization of men precisely what the feminists try to prevent.. Any male-only group is either quickly infiltrated by feminists or, if they refuse to follow their toe-line, then they are called incels/terrorists. Feminists will never allow MRM to organise.
/r/MensRights24/04/22 02:32 AM
1

Early waves of feminism did enormous good for our society and we can agree is still needed in 3rd world countries were women are denied opportunities. One of the top posts right now is a about 12 yr old boy getting arrested after a 17 yr girl got pregnant in India. In 2013, feminists in India lobbied against a gender-neutral rape law and got it overturned to keep it biased against men. Do you really think 3rd world countries need feminism? When they have bigger issues like terrorism and communal…
/r/MensRights24/04/22 02:14 AM
1

OP is from UK not Canada. And even Canada still has gendered scholarship programmes, affirmative actions and a few months back passed a bill specifically to support 'single-mothers'. (Note that it excludes single-fathers based on their gender)... So.. Whatever 2017 bill you are claiming, it doesn't seem to get implemented uniformly anyways..
/r/MensRights23/04/22 07:38 AM
2

In strict literary terms you are right. Sex is biological. Gender is a social phenomenon. But most people use them interchangeably. If you go through the original post, OP doesn't seem to differentiate gender and sex in the same context that you meant. Does that mean society treats all genders equally? Certainly not. Because it doesnt explain gender biased draft. Gender biased rape law. VAWA law. Laws are a social phenomenon. So in a gender-equal society, biased laws should not exists. Concept o…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 04:20 PM
4

the vast majority of what was believed to be biological gender differences were actually just socially enforced ones. If society collapses, women would be right back in the same position, we are physically weaker and that’s the law of the jungle. Your own statements prove the point I was making in my last comment. The roles were not socially enforced. The roles were assigned to genders because that was the best way the society could function. For most of human history, there was no government or…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 12:59 PM
4

Yes, but the average male-personality and female-personality are different. There is considerable overlap (because humans display very low level of dimorphism) , but there is considerable difference between the two averages.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 12:20 PM
1

Tall, handsome men existed throughout history. But they were forced to be monogamous or die single in the traditional world. Imagine the Knight, or a high ranking military officer in the middle ages. They were all monogamous. In fact, it was embedded in their honour-code (Chivalry). FDS works only in traditional circumstances. It wont work in modern world. Being stand-offish will further reduce your dating prospects. FDS would have probably failed even in a traditional world, due to their stand-…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 12:15 PM
5

Sexual dimorphism evolved over 700 millions years ago. No human societies existed back then.. To call the differences 'social construct' the societies should have pre-dated sexual dimorphism. I think you do not understand basic 'causality'. Cause preceeds effect. Biology (cause) preceeds social construct (effect).. If you social construct theory has to be considered anything other than 'flat-earth hypothesis' you will have to prove that social behavior predated biological behavior. Your clock is…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 09:36 AM
4

Mental differences already exists between the two sexes. This is common knowledge. Merely because OP said they don't exist wont make the behavioral-differences disappear. Of course, they aren't absolute. Some women display masculine behaviours, and some men display feminine behavior.. But on an average, men display masculine behavior more frequently than women. (Vice-versa for feminine behavior). (The same way as some women are tall and some men are short. But on an average, men are taller than …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 09:22 AM
6

Yes. The differences are small. Mainly because humans actually show less sexual-dimorphism than other species. Probably because we rely on tools rather than brute strength for success. But these differences definitely exist. To call them 'social construct' is absurd. They become apparent only in competitive environment like sports, games (like chess) and of course mating.. In its simplest form, mating is a competitive process too. Where you have to out-compete other potential mates to your indiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 08:19 AM
2

There is no biological imperative to have kids.. Our brains have evolved to have a basic sex drive. In the natural environment, sex leads to babies.... The drive to have babies isn't independent of the drive for sex. The problem is that, humans are not prepared to live in a world where sex and reproduction has been separated. Modern world with its BC methods separates the two. Men who sleep around, are still acting on their biological imperatives. Its just that the technology prevents any 'accid…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 07:42 AM
1

Men who want long-term relationship have a plethora of options. A dating strategy should aim to make you 'stand-out' among the crowd. So that you get chosen over other 100 people they can choose from. I don't see how FDS helps a woman stand-out among potential other women who are 'just cool' and 'fun to be around'. (Compare that to TRP which tells men to be confident, earn money and build up muscles... Something that will make them stand-out among the crowd of men. How does FDS achieve that?)
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 07:34 AM
1

Actually a strategy like FDS can theoretically work in a 'traditional world'. A world where women vet-out bad men and gravitate towards the 'nice guys' who are goal directed, earn well and do not sleep-around. But the problem is that the modern world is not like that at all. Most women have zero vetting skills. And by the time they implement the FDS strategies, they are a bit too old. At this point, they are facing competition from younger women who aren't using these vetting-strategies... So, m…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 07:29 AM
1

Prenups aren't valid in all countries.. (Eg. In UK). In countries that they are valid, there are stringent criteria like two attorneys, notorized, 6 month waiting period before marriage. They can become invalid for long-term marriages or if kids are involved (over 10 yrs in Canada for example). And most importantly, the usual sore-points of divorce (custody, alimony, CS) cannot be pre-stipulated in a prenup. They are determined by the judge. Prenup does not protect property acquired during marri…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 07:16 AM
19

Its a stupid and unscientific take. 'Gender is a social contruct' means than gender should have come-into existence after societies were established. Which is wrong. Sex on earth evolved ~700-650 million years ago. Way before human societies got established (10-15k yrs ago). The differences in sexes is called sexual-dimorphism. Which is displayed by 90% of sexually reproducing species including worms and microscopic organisms. You will not deny the fact that men on-average are taller, heavier, h…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 06:48 AM
0

Yes. I agree. I gave the example of marriage because its obvious. You can extend it to application and interview as well. Where you are expected to pay for all the meals and costs of interviews. (Even if you are rejected). And your job applications can be harshly rejected and can even lead to you being labelled a 'creep' and end-up in Jail if the company doesn't like your resume.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 06:30 AM
1

Its mandated by law buddy. That's what 'being married' means. That you owe her 50% of your assets and income. And if you divorce, you will pay her alimony and child support. (Even if the kids aren't biologically yours).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 06:26 AM
0

NO! Telling people that their happiness depends on another person is an 'AWFUL ADVICE'. What's wrong in being happy with yourself? If you aren't happy with yourself, nobody else can make you happy. And if you already are happy, you don't really need anybody else to make you happy anyways.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 06:20 AM
1

Its absolute cap that that relationships cannot be a source of happiness. Relationships can definitely be a big source of happiness. Nobody says that relationships cannot be a source of happiness. But there are two points against telling lonely men to pursue happiness.. No # 1 point: Relationship aren't the only way to be happy. You can be happy single. Can have a network of family and friends that give you company and social-life. Human are social animals and we need other people to be happy. B…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 06:05 AM
3

No. Men in relationship (especially marriage) are treated worse than an employee. Imagine a job where you are expected to invest 50% of your past, present, and future income (including retirement savings). Half of your assets. And if you quit, you will have to pay 20-25% of your future earnings to your company. And, you can be fired with no-fault of yours, but still end up losing your assets and pay your future earnings. Effectively, this is what marriage is for the average man. I'd rather have …
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 05:38 AM
1

https://www.forbes.com/sites/traversmark/2020/04/16/your-height-has-a-big-impact-on-your-salary-new-research-seeks-to-understand-why This an actual research which confirms what they said. The average salary goes up by 1.3% for every centimeter in height.... So, unless you can provide a counter research or a valid criticism, their point seems valid.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 05:28 AM
1

You are not being discriminated against when someone says “that’s not welcome here” I’m trying to understand what specifically makes you feel harmed. I care about that perspective and the dialog around it. Its difficult to believe these two statements are coming from the same person. You are either delusional or a troll. Either ways, there is nothing fruitful that come out of discussion with a troll. So, you move-on. You said you are a feminist. This is not a feminist space. So, go and discuss y…
/r/MensRights22/04/22 05:16 AM
1

You said it doesn't harm you. So move-on. None of your business how it affects me, if it affects me at all. It harms me so I'll discuss it. Either you provide a solution or go to a forum which discusses issues relevant to you. If this discussion isn't relevant to you, then you don't belong here. So move-on!
/r/MensRights21/04/22 04:30 PM
1

Well if it doesn't cause any harm to you, then YOU MOVE-ON. It causes harm to me. So I'll discuss the issues. If it doesn't doesn't affect you then go somewhere else where the issues relevant to you are being discussed. You aren't providing anything useful to the discussion anyways.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 03:42 PM
2

You can provide your perspective without specifying your gender too. Discrimination against 'everybody' is the real harm. The same companies don't shut down hate against men by women and other men (like you). That's the problem we are discussing here.. Your input doesn't seem to provide a solution for that.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 03:01 PM
2

Ya.. Will definitely register there. After reddit banned mgtow2 I installed the app. So I dont get PM's. Will get there...
/r/MensRights21/04/22 02:56 PM
3

You won't get any respect here for being a man. That's the difference between MRM and feminism. We judge people for what is there between their ears, not for what is there between their legs. Your thinking matters, not your gender. If you are feminist, you will not get any respect here. Irrespective of your gender.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 09:21 AM
2

I already registered there. With the same username. (I didn't provide an intro--that should give u the hint which place I mean).
/r/MensRights21/04/22 09:07 AM
6

The point I wanted to make is that, the 'sexism' you mentioned is deeply rooted within feminism too. It's just that it's directed against men instead. A lot of these laws I mentioned have been advocated for by feminists. (VAWA for example. Gender biased rape laws in some countries. Feminists promote infant MGM too.) The reason MRAs take anti-feminist stance is because feminism is inherently anti-male. That doesn't mean we are against women's rights. It just means we want to deplatform feminism f…
/r/MensRights21/04/22 09:05 AM
1

US I guess. If you compare to Asian countries, it would be leftist.
/r/MensRights21/04/22 08:56 AM
4

Ya. But if you tell men to avoid marriage, they will immediately get defensive or label you a misogynist or incel.. Most men marry despite knowing the risks because they think the woman they are marrying is 'different'. But if they have other alternative ways of enjoying life, then some men will follow those ways. You only need to show that way. By making an example of yourself. When boys see a single successful bachelor, they will follow you. Nothing succeeds like success.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 07:36 PM
1

I don't think I implied that MRM is leftist. I think its more of a 'centrist' movement. But attracts people from all across the political spectrum. Generally people have a view that this is a far-right movement... Which is obviously false. At best MRM is a liberal, centrist (or slightly right-leaning) movement.. Most here are pro-choice too.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 07:33 PM
5

I am not talking about 'general problems'. I am talking about LAWS which affect all of us. Including me. Luckily I am not circumcised because my parents had more brains that our so-called intelligent leaders.. But everything else affects me. And all men who come under these laws.. Of course, I can avoid some of them, like marriage and cohabitation (which I do), but some things like conscription are unavoidable.. Discrimination of women at workplace is against the law. As far as expertise is bein…
/r/MensRights20/04/22 07:21 PM
3

Nice to see our old mod here...
/r/MensRights20/04/22 07:02 PM
27

I'm a woman who believes she should be allowed to go to work without being told I'm lesser, having my expertise scrutinized, and having everyone walk on eggshells around me because I might be offended. To me that is feminism I am man, who should be able to be born without the fear of my genitals beings mutilated at birth.. Go to work or any public place without the fear of being raped by a woman. (Which is legal in my country for a woman to rape an adult man). If I marry or cohabitate, I want to…
/r/MensRights20/04/22 02:47 PM
23

I'm wildly aware of the toxic side of feminism. He is telling you to post in an official feminism subreddit.. You know what to expect there. Try raising it an 'feminist event'. Or a public feminist forum sponsored by govt. You know what to expect.. The issue he is highlighting is not the toxic side of feminism.. Its the whole feminism movement. Your post will never be received positively even in taxpayer-funded feminist spaces meant for domestic violence. Even if they acknowledge it, they will s…
/r/MensRights20/04/22 02:27 PM
2

https://m.timesofindia.com/india/activists-join-chorus-against-gender-neutral-rape-laws/articleshow/18840879.cms This is the reason. Feminists advocate for anti-male biased laws. I can give you 100s of examples across all countries. But this one drives the point home.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 02:05 PM
24

I had posted this comment on mgtow2 once, but it still make sense here. The goal of MGTOW should not be encourage men to give-up on marriage. Its obviously the best solution, but it goes directly against our social-conditioning, religious views, and even biological imperatives. The goal should be provide an alternative to the 'traditional societal model' of life. To set an example that a man can live happy and fulfilling life even without marriage or kids. If a viable alternative exists, combine…
/r/MensRights20/04/22 01:56 PM
19

MRAs are fighting for financial abortion and getting non-bio fathers relieved of CS payments. By 'fellow travellers' if you mean conservatives, then I am sorry to blow your bubble, but most here do not lean conservative. MRM does overlap with some conservative views. But conservatives are not, and never will be, on-board with a lot of MRM issues like MGM, gender neutral draft, gender-neutral rape and DV laws, financial abortions, etc.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 01:22 PM
14

Merely commenting here or posting a post will get you insta ban on many subreddits. (r-offmychest for example). Some mods may ban you manually after going through ur comment history. Commenting here will also ban you from a direct reply on 'ask feminist sub'. Their sub rules only allow 'feminist' to post a direct reply.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 01:17 PM
1

It was developed in 2018. The initial trails were promising. 'All the information' is a vague term. The study subjects injected in 2018, will be checked for reversibility in 2023-25. Unless reversibility is proven, it cannot be marketed as 'safe'. The reversibility is the biggest difference between vasagel and other permanent sterilization methods. Unless reversibility is demonstrated in the long-run, it cannot be approved by FDA.
/r/MensRights20/04/22 01:09 PM
2

I think you haven't been legally accused. But only rumours are being spread by your (presumed) bullies. (I am assuming this from the wordings of your post). Your best course of action is to strike first... Collect evidence of their bullying and file a complaint against them to the school. If the bullying is of sexual nature, then you can use title IX complaint as well. In the complaint, mention that they are threatening you with false accusations. (This will deem any subsequent complain by them …
/r/MensRights19/04/22 07:27 AM
2

The article is written by a feminist, in a pro-feminist publication. There is absolutely no reason to believe that it is written with best interests of men in mind.. Gender-gap closing is a good thing. And if this drives-down marriage and/or birth rates then its even better thing. As women make progress in their careers, men are finally getting relieved of the responsibility of being the 'provider and protector'. Men are finally being relieved of our traditional gender-roles. If it has side-effe…
/r/MensRights19/04/22 07:19 AM
7

I wonder why I haven't been banned from there, although I always post here.. May be their algorythm haven't found me.. Yet.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 06:00 AM
0

Although you are down-voted, I agree with you partially. Hiring a photographer or taking photos with the right angles and lighting is the key. Many girls have said that I look better in-person than I do in my photos. (I don't really use dating apps. The photos they mention are usually from my social media profiles and stuff). But I can imagine how poorly shot photos in your dating profile can mess-up your overall attractiveness. Having said that, dating apps are horrible. Human brains are simply…
/r/MensRights19/04/22 05:57 AM
9

Honestly, what else did he expect from a 20 yr old? That's why red pill knowledge is important for men. At 20, she isn't looking forward to 'settling down'. She wanted 'some fun' and she got it. OP is too idealistic. At 26, he isn't getting a virgin. So, there is no point in 'staying a virgin'. He should explore and get more experience in dating before committing to his 'first GF'. People are correctly pointing out that he is being too naive. Yes, he was definitely led-on by the girl. But an ave…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 06:48 AM
1

My advice to a 59 yr man who is struggling with dating would be to give-it-up. AND invest in his retirement. And buy a retirement home (or a yatch/farmhouse if he is rich enough) and enjoy his twilight years. Do you really think he needs a woman (for LTR) in last 15-20 yrs of his life? The only ones who he will attract at this age are the ones who are interested in getting some 'inheritance'.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 06:23 AM
9

Its still under trial. The reversibility hasn't been fully tested yet. (Its a long term injection, so it will be 5-7 years before the reversibility is fully tested in long-term). If successful, it will be a game-changer for birth control. Indian patenting laws will also allow it to be way cheaper than what would have been, if an American company had developed it.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 05:44 AM
13

You know, after browsing through some pro-feminist male advocate pages i finally realised what my problem with them is. All male issues they acknowledge are purely psychological. All of them. You didn't go deep enough. Here are some of the male-issues feminist discuss. -paternity leave. -men doing less childcare. -male suicide rates. -male child abuse. There are more, along the same lines. But you can see the pattern here. Feminists discuss only those men-issues which when solved will either dir…
/r/MensRights18/04/22 04:47 AM
0

Exactly! Mine ends with four digits too!.. OP will call me a troll. Lol!
/r/MensRights18/04/22 04:24 AM
2

When women ask for women-only spaces, its not called 'sexism'. In fact, such spaces are funded by the govt with taxpayer's money. But suddenly some men building a male-only space with their own money, becomes an issue. People have a right to get their own safe-space with their own-money. None of the business of anybody else. Especially that of feminists.
/r/MensRights18/04/22 04:22 AM
15

Everyone wants a safe-space. Its not the 'privilege' of only women to have safe-spaces.. Feminists hate men. Having feminist women in a male-only space will destroy the mental health of these men. They want safe-space. They got it. Women can build their own network. Who cares!
/r/MensRights18/04/22 04:15 AM
1

Morality is flexible. What is moral for you, may be immoral for me. And vice-versa. Morality is a grey area. And its not uniform across all people or cultures. But laws are uniform and apply to all citizens of a given country.. So, if I have to follow some 'standard', I would prefer a legal standard over a moral standard.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 06:34 PM
1

https://www.news.liverpool.ac.uk/2016/02/25/are-women-more-attracted-to-dark-and-brooding-men 2016 study. But it still holds true. Women are attracted to dark-traid traits. Especially for short-term relationships.. (Which is what you see in colleges.)
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/22 08:17 AM
1

The laws were passed over 50 years ago. Most of the members of this subreddit weren't even born back-then. 'Its not a good thing' is a vague statement... The statement is legally incorrect. And morally, it depends on your views. (Particularly religious views). Religion is 'patriarchy'. I think the society is fighting to 'destroy' it. There is no reason for us to uphold the principles of 'patriarchy' anymore.. Especially the ones that harm men. (And women alike)
/r/MensRights17/04/22 07:54 AM
2

I guessed from his first post that he was from India. Good that he escaped... I feel bad for the girl too. She got manipulated into premarital sex (by her as well as OPs parents) and now OP also dumped her. Being an adult, she should have known better. But it wasn't her fault entirely either.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 06:54 AM
3

The problem is that, if you mention incel culture to boys, they will google it up and end up watching more incel content.. The solution is to remove misandry and 'boy hatred' from school. The article itself mentions, that videos get recommended to boys by 'algorythm'. You cannot gaslight boys forever. The reason men agree with red pill ideology, is because it aligns with their personal experience.. It speaks the truth. 'An extreme version of the truth'- Yes. But the truth nevertheless. Feminist …
/r/MensRights17/04/22 06:28 AM
4

Ahh! Late 20s to early 30s... The typical age they transform into Karen!
/r/MensRights17/04/22 06:12 AM
3

https://m.timesofindia.com/india/activists-join-chorus-against-gender-neutral-rape-laws/articleshow/18840879.cms The law was proposed gender-neutral by a 'MAN'. (Justice Lodha committee). It was lobbied against and overturned by feminists.. Bigots like you hide behind the 'wooden shield of patriarchy' to cover up for crimes of feminism. The problem is feminism. Not male leaders.. Who are way better than feminists any day.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 06:07 AM
1

The whole purpose of inventing birth control and abortion rights was to allow people to have sex without worrying about having a kid. So, your point doesn't make sense. Its 50 years too late for that! Birth control methods can fail. But this isn't a case of failed BC. She deliberately lied about taking pills. That's reproductive coercion. And could even be 'rape' depending on the place and local laws.
/r/MensRights17/04/22 06:02 AM
10

It was made gender-neutral in 2019. The rape law still remains gender-biased though. Same goes for DV law in India (498A). The rape law is so biased, that its legal for a woman to rape an adult man in India. Disgusting! (The rape law was proposed gender-neutral in 2013. Guess who lobbied and got it overturned?) https://m.timesofindia.com/india/activists-join-chorus-against-gender-neutral-rape-laws/articleshow/18840879.cms
/r/MensRights15/04/22 08:03 AM
2

It has only 33% chance of reversal if done within 3 years. After that it the reversal success rates decrease to less than 10%. That's far from being 'reversible'. Do not quote medical facts unless you have full information about them.
/r/MensRights15/04/22 07:44 AM
1

He already told her is doesn't want a child. What is there to 'discuss' about. In a monogamous marriage, it's reasonable to trust your partner with birth control.. I agree that the man should get vasectomy or use condom in casual circumstances. But in a marriage, he is absolutely correct in trusting his wife with birth-control... She deliberately lied and manipulated him. What she did would qualify as 'rape' in some jurisdictions. Even if it falls short of rape, its still a huge betrayal neverth…
/r/MensRights15/04/22 07:39 AM
5

I think this sub should be more about bringing to light things like male discrimination, suicide rates, fatherhood, etc. All these can be done without taking shots at feminism is what I sincerely believe in. Otherwise, this movement would be following the same path as feminism. Male discrimination is carried out and perpetrated by feminists... The discussion around men's issues is incomplete without pointing fingers at feminism. Feminism itself is responsible for 90% of issues men face today.
/r/MensRights14/04/22 03:14 AM
7

Height is an important criterion in a man's attractiveness... Tell me how a 5'3" man 'lookmax' himself to become attractive? He simply can't. No matter what he tries. Even if he learns to hold a conversation, he will most likely be friendzoned. That blows a hole through your theory. If a man is unattractive, he is unattractive.. Lookmaxing may make a average man above average. But if he is 'below-average' he simply cant 'lookmax'. No matter what.. (Below average is where ~50% would lie in the ge…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 08:41 AM
3

The robots will do only basic household chores. (Like laundry and vaccuming.)... Tasks for which we already have robots for. Do you really think household tasks are that tough? I clean, cook, laundry myself. I stay alone.. It barely takes 2 hrs/day with all the modern tools.. These tasks aren't difficult. Most guys and girl learn them by the time they are 18. Sexbots will only satisfy sexual needs. And may maintain some basic conversations. Robots are task specific.. Nobody expects AI robots to …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 06:32 AM
2

The male-breadwinner is biologically hardwired in women... Its not a social construct. Women already earn same or more than average man. But they still prefer a man who earns as much or more than her. This applies to even 'feminist' women. https://nypost.com/2019/09/06/broke-men-are-hurting-american-womens-marriage-prospects Note that the study found that women's ideal husband had 58% higher income than that of men in their dating pool. Even if women earn more than men, they will never partner-u…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 06:29 AM
2

Exactly! Especially the financial-provider aspect of male partner... Something that AI bots can never reproduce. Women hate the idea of financially providing for their sexual partner. AI robot would be equivalent of the 'deadbeat BF'. Most women who try it, will quickly get 'bored' of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 06:45 PM
2

They can donate sperm to a woman (who has an AI partner) and offer to co-parent with her. Or donate to a lesbian couple. But in the latter case, he may not have any parental rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 06:40 PM
8

The problem with male AI sexbots is that, they will be equivalent of the modern 'deadbeat BF'. AI robots will be good at having sex with, satisfy you, sings praises about you but they wont pay the bill, take you out on dates (at least can't pay for the date), or buy a house with you. If the woman is considering sperm donor, then the AI BF wont be a good 'father figure' for her kid. Female sexbots (for men) typically satisfy what men expect in a partner. Sex on demand, submissive, does basic hous…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 06:37 PM
7

Men get a place to deposit their seed and ensure a woman doesn’t fuck other guys. The paternity laws allows women to get pregnant from other man and still make the husband pay child support.(even if he has DNA proof.). Marriage has no repercussions for the woman who cheats. It only punishes the husband. (Even with modern scientific tests at his disposal)
/r/MensRights12/04/22 04:06 PM
2

I agree with everything you said. But a social change is impossible without political will. About MGTOW, I agree. Its about defining your own parameters of success.
/r/MensRights12/04/22 03:55 PM
2

Feminism wasn't always so bad... Most women in their 50s-60s have seen feminism in a good light. Its more recently that it has become toxic misandry that it is. Feminism was never about gender equality but, at least till 1980s-90s, it mostly focused on genuine issues. Not flimsy artificially-manufactured issues that it does today. Plenty of women see through this BS. Remember that kids (both boys and girls) are brainwashed by feminist teachers from preteen age. But most of them outgrow it by lat…
/r/MensRights12/04/22 06:36 AM
2

MRM is banking on women to vote in society's interests. Do you really think feminism truly fights for 'women's interests'? Or it is the interest of a few 'elite' women?
/r/MensRights12/04/22 05:23 AM
3

Political approach is the only viable approach for MRM at present. Unless we elect politicians who represent men's issues, the society will continue to downgrade men. But that's far from easy.. Even the conservative politicians are 1st-level Simps. Finding a politician who truly represents MRM is like finding a needle in a needle-stack. (The other approach to MRM is what MGTOW represents. Disengage from society and let it collapse. And hopefully the reset will be more egalitarian. But that not w…
/r/MensRights12/04/22 05:20 AM
6

Its not women's place to call out short men or fat men either. Fat shaming and height shaming happens to men too... But as usual, the society only cares when shaming happens to women. This episode, at least to me, appeared as a gimmick to address that problem. But instead, it turned around and backfired on the feminist media.
/r/MensRights11/04/22 02:32 PM
34

Its good to see that. I honestly thought it (the 'slap') was a publicity gimmick. Scripted to bring attention to body-shaming of women and deter men who call out 'fat' women, etc. (Hope you get the picture of what I mean). But it has backfired spectacularly. Instead of focussing on body-shaming, people are focussing on 'what is the real issue'. That is- how abused-men react differently than abused-women. What society called 'toxic masculinity' (violence as displayed by Will Smith), has its root …
/r/MensRights11/04/22 06:59 AM
3

She probably wasn't even flirting.. As a bachelor, I have got those compliments several times. (from much older ladies). Usually they mean something along the lines as 'you are handsome man, you should get a GF/wife.' It depends on the 'context' in which it was said to OP. Calling someone 'handsome' is not creepy. Commenting on your D-size etc would be creepy. But personally I find older women very respectful about that.. Only women that pass such comments are younger 'feminist' type, or online …
/r/MensRights11/04/22 02:14 AM
1

Breaking up with them due to not having sex here and now, that's effectively saying you see them as a biological being to bring orgasms, not a human being with feelings and what they mean to you. No! it only means that you have 'needs' and YOU have the right to fulfil them. If your GF wants to wait for one year (virgin or not), she is effectively telling you to be celibate for a year. That's violating your 'personal needs'. Best, and only, option is to be break-up and go separate ways. There is …
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:29 PM
8

Just because they talk to OP about study related stuff, doesn't mean they are into 'studying'. It simply means they don't see OP as 'sexually attractive' and doesn't flirt with him.. Even the most nerdiest girls become flirty the moment they are with a man they are 'genuinely attracted to'.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:16 PM
2

OP can stop paying the mortgage. And contact the bank to ask for liquidation of the house.. Of course she will deny it. To which OP can offer to sell-off his equity in the house and tell his ex to pay solely henceforth. Or they both sell off and take their respective share. Technically they cant make him pay if he no longer wants to stay in he house. Stopping payment will lead to bank confiscating the property.. (If OP has evicted the house, it doesn't really matter to him.) His credit score wil…
/r/MensRights10/04/22 05:58 PM
15

UK doesn't have a common law marriage too. So, she cant demand OP to pay mortgage or bills.. Even if she removes him from the house, she will have to pay his share of equity and settle for a custody+child support agreement. OP should record the conversation and strike first. Her behavior may earn him full custody and CS too.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 11:36 AM
21

MGTOW aren't MRAs. The army cannot capture you, if you aren't there when they arrive. That's what MGTOW tells men.. Its not about walking away from women, its about doing your own thing in a society, which doesn't care for your wellbeing. Difference between MRA and MGTOW is that MRAs are trying to convince a gynocentric society to care for men. Whereas MGTOW is just trying to convince individual men to care for themselves. One man at-a-time.... Which task do you think is easier, and more realist…
/r/MensRights10/04/22 10:23 AM
1

Sex-selective abortions is banned in many countries... Its bigoted countries like USA that allows it to happen legally.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 08:32 AM
2

So, if a woman falsely accuses me (or one of my friends) of rape, then am I justified in shooting her? The justice system doesn't get rid pf false accusers either.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 08:30 AM
2

So, how exactly is terrorism defined? Is there any criteria for exclusion and inclusion?
/r/MensRights10/04/22 08:16 AM
2

Doesn't matter. Once a country's male-population falls below a certain threshold, other countries will perceive it as weak. So, at the opportune time they will trigger a war and the low-male country simply wont have enough men to defend itself... In this case it would be state mandated for a portion of the population to have male children, only for them to be brought up as soldiers for the state. If society dips to a point where the only men being raised are out of necessity to fight wars. Will …
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 07:49 PM
1

Again, your personal opinion doesn't matter when it comes to laws. India does have gender biased rape law, but the pedophilia law (POSCO act) is gender neutral. So, she will still be a criminal in India.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 07:44 PM
4

Depends on what you call 'reasonable looks'. A guy 5'9" tall, handsome face and jawline, athletic body with flat abdomen typically puts you into top 20% men in America. (0.5x0.5x0.5= 12.5%). I am assuming these values to be distributed 50-50 among male population. That means only about 12.5% men actually cross the 'reasonable looks' threshold you mentioned.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 07:04 PM
1

You are inverting the cause and effect.. The cause of female-emancipation is a socially developed society.. The cause of social development isn't female-emancipation. Feminism is a phenomenon of the 'prosperous world'. The moment hard times hit, women go back to traditional gender-roles... This is an article in a 'feminist publication' which confirms what I am saying. https://www.insidehook.com/article/sex-and-dating/women-want-nice-guys
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 04:53 PM
3

Yes you are right that gender- dynamics shift. But they will never kill-off these men. A country with 10% male population will become highly vulnerable to aggression or war by a rival country.. Look at how Ukraine responded to Russian aggression. Suddenly they needed men to fight 'war'. No country will risk a low male population... A country like Russia or China can easily take advantage of that situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 04:37 PM
1

That's the sex ratio at birth. (Natural ratio is 105 per 100). So its close to the natural birth rates.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 04:33 PM
16

Sex-selective abortion is a crime in India. Pro-choice doesn't mean people should be allowed to abort babies based on gender. Idk about China, but in India its illegal even to reveal gender of the baby before birth. Illegal sex-determinations do happen though, but the sex-ratio at birth is ~107/100 according to latest census. Which is close to the natural birth rate (105/100), so it seems the ban is working. China's ratio is 118/100.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 04:31 PM
54

I dont understand why such 'vigilante groups' are not labelled terrorists and banned!!?
/r/MensRights09/04/22 02:56 PM
55

She is already fired..and on welfare benefits at present. Quote: Carr was in "something of a vulnerable position" at the time because the boy's father had left her after she told him that she was pregnant. This tells why she outed the man.. Its misandry. She was taking the anger she had at the baby daddy out on another man. She acted on her misandry, not on any 'protective insticts'.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 02:55 PM
1

You mentioned the 'bigger picture' instead of limiting it to the gender-war. So, I ll try to give you a bird's-eye-view. Humans are highly co-operative species. When we try to compare ourselves we compare to other mammals or related species. Because those are what we seem to resemble. But when you look at the bigger picture (civilization), we actually resemble the social insects like bees or ants more than any mammals at all. We are industrious, we build complex structures, our society has a str…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 08:06 AM
2

You are adult. What is acceptable for you is not acceptable for a 14 yr old boy. You are not above the law.. Sex with 14 yr olds is rape and pedophilia. Free-speech doesn't include condoning crime.. Rape apologists are censored all over the world.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 07:38 PM
14

the people on here who actually want to promote rights for fathers etc have to deal with all these fucking losers who wanna just make it about being anit women. There are dozens of posts about custody and father's rights every day.. The top post right now is about the 50-50 custody bill in texas. This sub is about 'equal rights to men'. Which includes equal protection from DV laws. This is a domestic violence incident that led to murder of the man. Last time it happened to a woman, people were d…
/r/MensRights08/04/22 07:03 PM
2

My point is the men who are claiming 'I would have enjoyed it' are downplaying rape and victim-blaming the boy. They can sure fetishize whatever they want. But sex with 14 yr boy is non-consensual. They can keep their fetishes and casual misandry to themselves.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 06:55 PM
9

In india the sexual assault and rape laws aren't gender neutral. But in countries where they are, it can surely happen.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 06:52 PM
8

but it is possible to have a loving and happy marriage with one if you are careful about who you choose, so urging everyone here to avoid marriage at all costs is unwise. Its possible to have a happy and fulfilling life without marriage too. OP never said to avoid women or sex. He said to avoid 'marriage'. You don't need marriage to fall in love, have a long-term relationships, or even to have kids. He is specifically speaking about the legal and financial implications of marriage, which are det…
/r/MensRights08/04/22 06:42 PM
38

Three common friends have testified that she used to hit him while he wasn't violent on most occasions. Even if it was mutual DV incident, she is the one who stabbed him. So she is the murderer.. Neighbour only said he they saw BF slapping her. They don't know how the fight started. The friend's version is more reliable here.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 06:23 PM
5

None of those methods were safe and effective as a hormonal pill. Putting a lint leaf in your vagina in the pre-antibiotic era can lead to severe infection or sepsis. Abortions were also practiced in ancient times. But they weren't safe. Even childbirth had a high mortality.. Sex was a risky venture for a woman. Modern medicine changed it all. By 'traditional world' I mean a world where man worked outside and got paid and women worked at home and took care of kids. It was a balance that worked f…
/r/MensRights08/04/22 09:33 AM
2

You said you want to get raped. You are adult, you can do CNC or whatever. None of our business. A 14 year old wouldn't want to get raped. And even if he wants, an adult woman still has no right to rape him.. Even if the boy wanted it, its still rape. She is the adult here. Not the boy. If he was adult, this wouldn't have been a rape. And we would not be having this conversation. What you want personally, doesn't change the fact that she rape him.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 06:17 AM
2

The boy in question was 14 years old when the rape happened. The men commenting are mostly adult. Grown adult men who have wired fetishes, should have no right to victim-blame a rape victim.. If the fetish is common among boys 17+, then a teacher having sex with 14 yr old would be rape anyways. Isn't it?
/r/MensRights08/04/22 06:13 AM
5

traditional balanced trade in the best interests of both parties" doesn’t sit right with me. You consider men giving all their hard-earned resources just for sex (which women also derive pleasure out of This 'traditional balance' made sense in the traditional world. Where every sexual act risked pregnancy. So women would withhold sex till they were reasonably sure whether the man will 'stick around' and 'invested in her'. This dynamics plays-out today also where some women try to hold-out sex fr…
/r/MensRights08/04/22 05:57 AM
4

She had me right up until she predicted a breakdown of society if woman succeed and gain equal leadership positions. That's a terrible stance. Its saying as if women never held a powerful position in history.. Throughout our history, women have always guided and nurtured societal development and process. Its just that men were at forefront to do it, hence men take the credit. Also, when things go wrong, men take the blame too. Women's success will never cause problem to the society. The unilater…
/r/MensRights08/04/22 05:40 AM
2

The men who fetishize it are ones who have never gotten unwanted sexual attention in their life. (May be no sexual attention at all). Unwanted sexual attention is very distressing. Those who have got it, know what I mean. Those who haven't got, I pity them. But that doesn't mean their view should be weighed upon while taking decisions on important matters like rape.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 05:31 AM
5

You are an adult, so you can do whatever you want. At 14, you can't legally 'allow' her to do you. I didnt rape anyone or said the victim didnt suffer Not your decision to make. You are not the victim. 'A person who can't empathise with a rape victim'--- tells us everything about what we need to know about you.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 03:35 AM
2

So, if your 'teenage dream' comes true now, it would be rape isn't it? 'Because you aren't interested anymore'
/r/MensRights08/04/22 03:28 AM
4

Internalized misandry. What is the society doing to address it?
/r/MensRights08/04/22 03:26 AM
3

Exactly! Same goes when adult women who rape teenage boys. Having sex with your teacher is a common fantasy among teenage boys. But that doesn't mean they want it for real. When it happens in real, it is rape. And should be treated as such
/r/MensRights08/04/22 03:23 AM
1

Yes I agree... The fall in marriage rates is multifactorial.. Its more related to the weakening of economy. Proliferation of service jobs. (female dominated). Women see marriage as a mode to elevate their 'status'. So, most of then will not marry a man who earns less than her. (She may date him casually or have affair with him. But not 'marry' or 'commit' to him.) Men see marriage as a means to have kids (and family)... Not necessarily as a financial adventure. The FACT that marriage rates are f…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 06:38 AM
0

Pay is usually determined by market forces... Even minimum-wage laws have little impact, because it only gives you a minimum sustainable income. The truth is that, the in order to have a family and kids, you need somewhat surplus income. Which, in present economy, takes years to earn. (if not decades.). Student loan waiver is ridiculous. The taxpayer shouldn't pay for people who have made bad career choices... The issue of people not getting married is there in countries that have subsidized col…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 06:18 AM
8

Men are tired of being the society's 'safety net'. We want to be free of our 'gender-roles'. We want equality. How you balance it, is a whole different question. But if the society can't find a balance in its 'quest for gender equality', then such a society deserves the inevitable collapse that ensues. May be they should have thought about it before taking their 'equality' movement too far. Its too late to virtue signal to men to 'man-up'. Either yield or perish.. Only Two options. The third opt…
/r/MensRights06/04/22 11:40 AM
1

https://www.mollybkenny.com/news/u-s--remarriage-rate-has-dropped-40-percent-in-20-years.cfm The remarriage rate is dropping, and is largely replaced by cohabitation in the recent times.. This is a quote from your linked study. "Only 29% of previously married adults ages 18 to 24 (admittedly a small group) had remarried in 2013, compared with 67% of those ages 55 to 64. The high re-marriage rates you mentioned are for boomers. Who have a different view of marriage. Younger adults who have seen b…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 11:33 AM
10

But they don't pay CS or pay very little of it... Most of their babies are brought-up by 'welfare'. Which is funded by taxpayers. Withholding resources hits then where it hurts. Society will laugh at sexless men. But the moment they see a bachelor man enjoying his life, all hell breaks loose. Society doesn't care for a men sperms. It cares only for his wallet. And how to divert it to support women. Either by taxes or by spousal or child support.
/r/MensRights06/04/22 11:20 AM
4

All you need is one man to stop 'withholding'. And the society will have access to millions of sperms per day. All men will never withhold sperms. And if they really want more, they can retrieve sperms from dead men too. Sperms can survive for a few hours after death..
/r/MensRights06/04/22 11:16 AM
2

It simply means that at point, both genders are completely separated, The chances of that happening are infinitely low. But even if it does, it will solve lots of current societal problems like rape, sexual assault, domestic violence, paternity fraud, accidental pregnancies, gender war and possibly even wage gap. In essence, every issue that feminists are fighting for. (And some mens issues too). In summary, it wouldn't necessarily be a bad thing for the society, even if it happens. Yes, the new…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 07:23 AM
1

Yes, worse off compared to being married. The distinction may not seem important but things like the idea women get divorced for a cash payout doesn't align with it. The distinction is important because my standpoint is that 'marriage' itself elevates the financial and social status of women. That's the reason why most women are pro-marriage.(despite the risks) Because the 'risks are worth the potential benefits'. Its not ironic, it just points to how this sub isn't always in touch with or repre…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 07:13 AM
36

Withholding sperm is useless. Sperms are too abundant to be ever in short supply. What men need to withhold is our income. Not just from women. But from the welfare system too. Starve the system of its oxygen (taxes) and see it collapsing infront of your eyes. Its not even difficult to achieve that.. Avoid marriage, cohabitation (common law), and have sex with contraception. Without funds transfer from men to women, the birth rates will fall. Fewer children means fewer future taxpayers. As the s…
/r/MensRights06/04/22 05:05 AM
3

Women are statistically worse off after divorce than men, just by virtue of more often being a SAHP. 'Statistically worse' compared to what? Worse compared to pre-marital status or compared to her status when she was married. Women generally marry-up or at same social status. So, marriage generally elevates the social and economic status of majority women... Going down does mean she is 'worse-off'. It only means she is back to where she started pre maritally. Case in point :- Belinda Gates wasn'…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 10:29 AM
6

Its the men she is attracted to. Which are the top 20% men. Women only see men that are attractive. The rest of men are invisible to them. This explains her statement perfectly.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 08:09 AM
11

You have to also consider the current socio-economic dynamics... Commitment (which in your case I assume to be marriage +/- kids) is a great financial venture. Boys and men are lagging behind in both high school as well as college educations. Those who go, are saddled with student loans. So, a lot of men in early and late 20s aren't financially ready for long-term commitment. Even if they want to. Idk how to reverse this trend. Women innately want a man equal or better than her. If men lag behin…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 07:40 AM
0

A lots of things.. About science, maths, geography, astronomy, stars, planets, language, music, sports, everything. None of it is gendered.. Children are supposed know about it. Including 'human history'. Yes.. Humans.. Which includes both genders (plus more if you think there are many). When they are taught about dogs, they aren't taught about male and female dogs. When they are taught about wild animals, they aren't taught about how 'female lions are better than male lions, or otherwise too'. …
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 06:59 AM
0

It is if it's one sided. It wont be an issue is boys also taught about men's history how great men shaped history.. And there were some bad men too. Also bad women. Kids should know about them all. Presenting one-sided picture to kids, who do not have sufficient critical thinking, is grooming and indoctrination. And if you deny it, it tells me everything about you. You seems to posses the superpower of 'seeing through other people'. Why don't you go and look at yourself in the mirror?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 06:44 AM
0

I said feminism engage in indoctrination of girls and boys in schools... Do you really need a proof of that? We just passed the 'women's history month'. Which was observed in most of US schools. Feminism is a political movement. Preteen boys amd girls need not be exposed to politics. Ask your son what they did in their schools in last month? Teaching boys about women history isn't bad. But presenting preteen kids (who do not have critical thinking) a one sided view of the world is indoctrination…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 06:14 AM
0

Its none of your business what I am against, or for, for. My point still stands that feminists indoctrinate preteen kids, but conservative women do not. Prove me wrong. Or you only have ability to 'see through other people' but no ability to win arguments? Idk whether you can see through anything. But I ll know for sure whether you can stick to an argument without ad-hominem.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 03:08 AM
-1

First thing first, stick to the argument. I said conservative women do legally force their lifestyle on anybody. I said they do not engage in indoctrination.. You are yet to point proofs to disprove my statement. On the contrary, I said feminism engages in indoctrination of preteen boys and girls... You didn't counter that statement, because you know its true. As far as florida bill goes, I think its fair that schools stay out of sexual lives of kids till their puberty (the bill says only upto 3…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 02:56 AM
-1

The religious women haven't passed any law that forbids women from having a job and earning money either. Feminists shame SAHMs all the time. Especially if they cook and clean for their husband (who is the sole-breadwinner in their household). What a proof of that? I also have proof of how feminists engage in indoctrination and gaslighting of preteen boys and girls in schools. (Something conservative women do not engage-in.) So much so, that a certain state had to pass a law, recently, to preven…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 02:37 AM
1

Not all. Just most of them. Women who do not want kids, are eliminated from the gene pool each generation.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 02:31 AM
-1

They do not force it on anybody. Its the feminists who force their lifestyle on kids by indoctrinating preteen boys and girls... Yes, feminists force their lifestyles on boys and men too. That's makes them even worse than conservative women. Who at least spare men and kids out-of their own misery.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 02:28 AM
3

So, you mean to say that men having better control over their sexuality, and reproduction (including birth control), will somehow harm women? How is that even possible? The world is fighting for women's liberation. But as soon as men are released from the societal constraints, it becomes a 'problem'. His solution takes women out of equation. Men having control over their sexuality and reproduction, doesn't take anything away from women. Women can still have access to same technology and better t…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 02:12 AM
3

Good people marrying good people worked in a 1950s world where marriage itself was a good institution. But today, marriage isn't a trustworthy institution. Some good people will just avoid it coz its not that good anyways, and there are other viable alternatives... Good people will usually find other good people, but will they marry each other or not? That highly depends on how marriage is perceived. And in most developed countries, it isnt perceived with the same high-regard it used to be perce…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 01:46 AM
2

The person being left is going to be salty about this split regardless of if they're coming out with more or not. This discussion is specifically about divorce. In which, women usually get the better deal, regardless of who earned how much. In relationships overall, the split is usually 50-50. But in divorce, its close to 80-20, in favor of women. The family courts make sure that the woman gains or at least 'doesn't lose'. Even at the cost of the male partner, if the need be.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 01:34 AM
2

Actually failure rate of business is above 50%. And the risk of failure in gambling in even higher. But the difference is that people do not put half their assets into business and gambling. Most people put on their fun-money into gambling. And although people invest a lot into business, its rarely 50% of their assets or above that. Generally people start with a small business venture and it grows into a big business.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 01:27 AM
1

https://www.goldbergjones-or.com/divorce/interesting-divorce-statistics/ According to this data it is 41%. Which correlates with most other studies too. Overall US divorce rate is 2.7÷6.3, ,that is ~44%. Yes divorce rates are higher in second and third marriages, but they form a small fraction of marriages overall. The general divorce rates reflect this fact pretty accurately.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 01:17 AM
22

At least we aren't writing articles about 'how to murder your wife'. The movement that encourages such books is provided billions of dollars of taxpayer funding. And the movement which points out towards such books is 'hated'. If humanity comprises of people like you then I wouldn't even be bothered to save it, if the time comes to do so.
/r/MensRights05/04/22 12:51 AM
4

The post blamed a murderer.. So, what if happens to be a woman? Feminism talks about killing and castrating rapists all the time.. Does that prove that they hate all men? No, they hate rapists (a huge percentage of whom are women). What makes feminist misandrist is that it tries to protect and defend female rapists. Not that it trashes rapists. Its that, it condones rape when done by a woman against a man.
/r/MensRights04/04/22 05:15 PM
12

We are trashing a murderer and the simp judicial system which allows criminals to go scot-free. If you think its an attack on women, then may you should teach girls not to kill men. (Oh! That's exactly the opposite of what feminism teaches girls)
/r/MensRights04/04/22 04:11 PM
5

This is a gender-flipped version of the school attack the authorities blame on 'incels'. She clearly targeted men and boys, and said that her 'motivation' for the attack was that 'women are oppressed in education and jobs'. Its obvious that misandry is the reason behind this attack.. Lets also see which 'websites' she visited most frequently and label all those organizations as 'terrorists'.. (I bet there will lot of feminist websites possibly even UN women. I wouldn't be surprised to see even a…
/r/MensRights04/04/22 06:33 AM
-2

The problem with that statement is that not all men who 'compliment' this way have a good intention.. It may be a small chance, but ~1 in 10 such men wont hesitate to use force if they get a chance. 10% chance is small but certainly scary for the girl. Ignoring or acknowledging such 'compliment' isn't always an option. Its the same reason why we say marriage is a bad deal for men. It does have benefits. But with 50% risk of divorce, and the obvious costs to the man + judicial bias makes the risk…
/r/MensRights04/04/22 06:14 AM
3

But feminism only aims at freeing women from their traditional gender-role while enforcing (and doubling-down) male roles on men. How is that a fight for 'gender-equality'?
/r/MensRights03/04/22 05:04 AM
3

Even patriarchy was also about men protecting and providing for women. Gynocentrism is ingrained in human psychology. In patriarchy, men put-up with it because of 'honour' and 'pride'. In matriarchy, men abandon it because there is no incentive. As patriarchy falls, men are getting liberated from the chains we didn't even know existed. Its just a matter of couple of more generations before we are fully free. Till then sit-back, relax, and enjoy the decline!
/r/MensRights03/04/22 05:01 AM
13

Her explanation actually justifies the permanent flight ban she got. She has psychotic illness, gets panic attack when touched by others, missing a few doses of medications can lead to severe psychotic episode, she is afraid of public transport. Tell me, how on earth can she be allowed to board a plane without an accompanying adult and doctor's clearance? She wasn't fit to board the plane. She deliberately hid her medical history from the airlines.. The resultant psychotic episode endangered 100…
/r/MensRights02/04/22 08:35 AM
5

You cannot force her to take paternity test. Even if you sue her for paternity, she can still deny consent for the test. (Baby is minor so it needs parent's consent. If you aren't listed on the BC, then only she can give consent). Your only hope to get a test is to convince her. Which she doesn't seem to be cooperating with. Suing her for paternity is your only other option. If you are happy with the baby getting adopted, then contact the hospital or local adoption agencies whether she has put i…
/r/MensRights01/04/22 06:00 PM
9

Taking this to family court will probably finish me off. How exactly will it finish you off? Court ordered paternity costs ~$500. Lawyer fees should not cost more than 1-2k. If she doesn't contest paternity, it should cost you no more than 2-3k... Your first priority now is to prevent the kid from going for adoption. The very fact she has left the city, suggests that she is using the safe-heaven laws to put the baby up for adoption. If you are okay with it, then let it go. Hoping that the baby (…
/r/MensRights01/04/22 05:24 PM
75

Court ordered samples have to follow an 'evidence chain', so the chances of them getting misplaced or tampered with are very low. Even the labs will not risk giving a false report.. Tempering with the 'evidence chain' is a federal offense. Nobody will put their career or life on the line just to hook a man for few thousand dollars per year.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 05:10 PM
6

Exactly! So, its a choice whether the mother or father takes time-off. And in majority of the cases its the mother. Finally, its comes down to the mutual choice of the spouses. It cannot be dictated by law. So, it will never be 50-50. According to studies, divorce rates increases by 75% if man loses a job. But a wife losing job has no effect on divorce rates. Men simply do not have the option of taking time-off.. Not without risking the marriage. (People really do not understand statistics, but …
/r/MensRights01/04/22 03:57 PM
1

You just go through other posts here and you will quickly figure out why marriage is a terrible deal for women too. (Emotional labour, more housekeeping duty, child birth and child care). Its not rosy for her either. But its certainly terrible deal for men. And much worse for men than women. Women push for marriage is because it guarantees them financial security. (Even if it ends in divorce). It doesn't guarantee anything to the man. Not even sex or children. Marriage traditionally was never me…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/22 03:19 PM
4

Govt gets involved because in case of divorce, the wife goes and cries infront of the judge that she should be compensated for her 'loss in income' and 'unpaid labour'. You are right. It is generally women who make that choice. But they do not take the 'responsibility'. When things go bad, the man takes the blame and has to pay alimony and/or child support. Men taking time out would work. But it will reduce his earnings too. Combined with the loss of his wife's income, it will cause a lot financ…
/r/MensRights01/04/22 03:06 PM
36

You best defense is a pre-emptive strike. Talk to a lawyer and consider a 'cease and desist' order. If you are in USA, a title IX complaint may also be a feasible option... Its unlikely that she will ever go for a formal complaint. But you will have to prepare your defense. Keep a log of all your snapchat and other conversations and 'strike first'. Make sure you go for the jugular. The system is against men. But it is framed in a gender neutral language. So, take advantage of it. Cease and desis…
/r/MensRights01/04/22 07:45 AM
1

It actually a well-intentioned undertaking. But its still a sexist take on sexual and interpersonal violence. Helping male victims should be 'equal priority'. It need not be seen as an afterthought. Although its a good initiative, I think it is more of an afterthought than a really well-intentioned undertaking.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 07:06 AM
28

Actually single-childless women out-earn their male counterparts by 3-5%. The earnings gap begins to appear after her first childbirth.. That's mainly because a lot of women (not all mind you) take a break or put-off their career goals for their kids. Nothing wrong in that. Its their life, their choice. Man's earnings also increase by about 10% after his first child is born... Its a clear correlation. Women comprise their earning for child. Men compensate for it (the lost income) by working hard…
/r/MensRights01/04/22 07:00 AM
1

no its my take from his story. No its your bigoted and sexist views towards men. That's why I called you out on your bigotry in my first reply. Men and women can live independent life. You don't have to marry anyone to be happy. Most people have relationships and get married because they want kids. Nobody 'uses' anybody else for that. People who don't want kids (like me) usually do not get married either. That's something I tell girls within a few dates. And you will be surprised at how many gir…
/r/MensRights01/04/22 06:46 AM
1

Not what i implied at all, MY implication was that he was never in the relationship for the relationship. And what is the evidence for that? He broke up because she revealed that they were incompatible. What does being 'in relationship for a relationship' even mean? People don't stay in a relationship for relationship-sake. People stay in relationships for the other person... If two people are incompatible then they shouldn't be in a relationship to begin-with. If she had revealed earlier that s…
/r/MensRights01/04/22 06:01 AM
1

Quote "yall need to stop look at women like they are tools to be used. Even as hurt as i am, i can see how wasnt with her to be with HER he was with her to create a child." Do you have selective amnesia for your own posts? What kind of language is this? He broke up because they were incompatible. You are saying he used her having kids. Which is a figment of your own imagination. He wanted to marry her because he though they had same long-term goals. When he realised that she was lying to him jus…
/r/MensRights01/04/22 04:31 AM
1

It was not an order. It was shaming language. You implied that he would be an asshole if he refuses to compromise his life goals for a thankless person who doesn't even have the courtesy of telling him that she has changed her mind about having more children or not. Why only HE should compromise? It is his life his choice. If they are incompatible then they are incompatible... He isn't an asshole for being incompatible with her. She is the asshole for lying. If she had changed her mind, she shou…
/r/MensRights01/04/22 04:20 AM
3

It is nothing to be ashamed of either. You were using 'shaming laguage' against a lifestyle of his choice.. I am not exactly celibate. But I will never get married or cohabitate. My body, my choice. You have no right to shame people for their choices.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 04:00 AM
1

You said he should let his 'goals fade away' because ??reasons?? Having kids is a goal of his life. Is there any way he marries her and still achieve his 'goal' of having biological kids? If yes, please suggest one. If no, then marrying her effectively kills his 'life goal'. I am not putting words in anyone's mouth. I am describing the logical outcome of him getting married to her.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 03:23 PM
1

He broke up because if he had married her, he will have to give up on having his own biological kids. He breaking up with her is because their long-term goals about having kids were incompatible.. 'Having kids is important to him'. And that is not possible with his (now) ex-fiance. That doesn't mean he is with her only for kids. It means they are not on the same page about having kids. What do you expect him to do? If he isn't on the same page with his future wife about having kids? A) Have kids…
/r/MensRights31/03/22 02:59 PM
24

There is no rape crisis anywhere in the world. Feminists use 'rape crisis' as a tool to control male-sexuality.. The traditional patriarchy controlled male sexuality through marriage. Marriage secures paternal investment into the kids. If father doesn't contribute, then the community (taxpayers) will have to raise the kids.. As the traditional control of society over men weakens due to feminism and hook-up culture, the feminists are desperately trying to get that control back. The feminist attac…
/r/MensRights31/03/22 02:46 PM
1

I wouldn't agree.. Unless my wife's life or safety is threatened, I wont use violence. Of course, if the person (irrespective of gender) puts her safety at risk. Then I will use reasonable violence to get my wife to safety.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 08:01 AM
1

You have no right to tell another person to make his 'goals' fade away. Its not your decision to make. Having kids is important to OP. He is 30, and has plenty of time to have and raise one. People care about their 'goals'. That's what being a 'human' means. If you ever had 'goals' you will understand what I mean.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 07:59 AM
1

Neither did OP say that he was in the relationship to 'only to have kids'. You made your own conclusion, so did I.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 07:56 AM
2

No they are not. They experimented with mice and grew the embryo to 11 days of gestation. (The pregnancy duration in mice is ~28 days). So its not even 50% of their gestational period. Humans have a gestational period of 280 days. That's 10 times more than mice. And fully mature human fetus consumes about 300 kcal of energy daily and tonnes of other nutrients.. Artificial wombs are 'far far away'. They just used a nutrient broth and grew the embroys with diffusion in medium. That isn't possible …
/r/MensRights31/03/22 07:38 AM
1

In my country, you aren't allowed to 'choose' a sperm donor... You are only given the race, medical history of the donor, age, country and substance abuse history like alcohol, etc. Height, colour of eyes, profession are npt disclosed. (Race is important because a white couple would prefer a white donor, asian couple prefers asian donor, etc. Whatever the media says, nearly 80-85% sperm donations are used by infertile couples. Not by unmarried women wishing to be single moms)
/r/MensRights31/03/22 07:31 AM
0

the asshole thing is how he treats the girl he’s basically a step father too, as someone with huge abandonment issues I can absolutely relate, this girl has had him in her life for more than half the time she can likely remember, both of the adults are assholes here for putting her in this situation, her mother should’ve treated this like a joint custody situation and the guy absolutely should’ve done the same, at the very least taper off until she’s emotionally ready, Read his original post. He…
/r/MensRights31/03/22 07:24 AM
1

How can he be with that person if his 'long term goal' of having kids cannot be fulfilled?
/r/MensRights31/03/22 07:11 AM
0

You said your wife 'couldn't give' you kids. Which implies that she was infertile.. Its a abject asshole move to leave your infertile wife.. There is a difference between 'infertility' and 'choosing to not have kids'. The first one is a medical condition. The second one is 'dealbreaker'. yall need to stop look at women like they are tools to be used. And women should also stop looking at men as ATM machines. To be used as a 'resource' for herself and 'HER' kids.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 07:08 AM
1

He isn't the father. Get over it! He said they took things slow. So, he clearly isn't in Sasha's life for 6 years... Probably for a much shorter duration. And even if he is a father figure. He still has the right to his own independence. He doesn't owe anything to his ex or HER daughter. If women want 'father' in their children's life, then they should only have kids with men that would 'stick around' for 18+ years. And if society thinks fathers or 'father-figure' are important for kids, then it…
/r/MensRights31/03/22 07:00 AM
1

But he can't do anything about it. He isn't the legal guardian of sasha. Tara has blocked him, so he cant take Tara's permission to see sasha either. If sasha shows up at his place, the best thing for him to do is to call her mother and let her pick sasha up from his place. He tried doing that, but he couldn't contact Tara. So, he called the police and let them deal with the kid. Letting Sasha stay at his house without her mother knowing about it is illegal. If Tara files a missing-person report…
/r/MensRights31/03/22 06:49 AM
2

Then why does feminism advocate for gender biased rape laws, DV laws, supports MGM and opposes gender neutral draft?
/r/MensRights31/03/22 06:07 AM
1

That's the oxford definition... Wikipedia has modified it to make it about 'equality of sexes'... Feminism has always been about women advocacy. The 'equality of sexes' is pure gaslighting and it is done to prevent the funds from getting diverted to men's issues.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 06:06 AM
10

There are women already at frontline. Casey Jaye, Honey badgers, the list is long. Women have always been strong enough to support their man and the society.. Until the victim-mindset 'feminism' came along. The main reason feminism today is receiving push-back is because women are gaining political and economic power and rejecting the victim-mindset hypothesis of feminism. Feminism will never run-out of simp men, what it is running-out of, is the gullible women who it can easily manipulate.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 05:57 AM
24

Plenty of women support mens rights. In fact, around 4-6 of the top 10 MRAs today are women. (4-6 depends on your list). That's almost 50%. Even on this sub, about 20% of posters are women. Feminists will never be in support of mens rights. Don't even expect it. But plenty of women do support MRM. Of course vert few of them (if any) happen tp be feminists.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 05:50 AM
2

So, if a woman insults my wife, am I justified in slapping her too?
/r/MensRights30/03/22 05:56 PM
14

This happened in California. And as per California law, it is a simple assault + battery. The only reason Mr. Smith wasn't arrested is because Chris didn't file a police complaint.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 05:54 PM
1

Because he was coerced to confess.. A confession under coercion is not considered a proof. That's the reason why his conviction was overturned in the first place. The overturning happened in the court of law. So, its enough to believe that the court held that the confession was under pressure.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 06:47 AM
3

A prenup only protects you partially. And it may not be valid in all countries. A legally airtight prenup is basically a copy-paste of the prevailing marriage laws. It only protects premarital assets. Anything acquired during the marriage, including equity on a business or property is shared 50-50 by law. Also, you cannot dictate child custody, CS and alimony in a prenup. (Which generally what 80% men complain about). There is a bit of wiggle room for some business interactions, bonds and trusts…
/r/MensRights29/03/22 08:04 AM
1

You will have to get proof that these are deliberate false-accusations and then file a lawsuit for false accusations. She probably did it at the advice of her defense lawyer. File a criminal defamation suit and ask for discovery. Specifically alleging that she did it at the behest of her divorce attorney and her motivation was to get ownership of the house. (You will have to prove the accusations false for that). Once it goes for discovery, she will offer settlement. Trust me. Her divorce attorn…
/r/MensRights29/03/22 07:32 AM
1

You don't need a red flag. Marriage itself is a walking-talking red flag.. Quote. "My defense attorney explains to me that most likely she called the police angry and filed a complaint and then the system takes over with out asking her if she wants to place charges (which is what happened)." This one sentence tell you everything about modern marriage. If younger folks want to benefit from this story, they should just take a print-out of this quote and hang in their bedroom. And read it everyday …
/r/MensRights29/03/22 07:25 AM
1

I think it was scripted. It might be real, but you have to also take into account that we are dealing with highly-skilled (oscar winning) professionals. They can easily make a scripted slap look real. I do think he was hit. But it wasn't an anger-burst moment. It seems like a carefully scripted sub-plot. That's why they apologised after it received backlash. (And no police complaint was filed. Why? Because that will reveal the truth).
/r/MensRights29/03/22 07:12 AM
2

He chose violence where he didn't need to use it. He is an abuser. PERIOD!
/r/MensRights29/03/22 07:07 AM
1

how it can making being a husband/father hard, and how the man is often blamed regardless of the situation. He is to be blamed because he used violence in a situation, he didn't need to. Isnt it shocking, that the liberals and feminists who oppose violence so much are condoning it when its done against a man? (For me its kinda expected from these pseudo-intellectuals, but I thought it may be surprising to you)
/r/MensRights29/03/22 07:06 AM
0

Violence is violence.. Its not something to be used for entertainment purpose.. I didn't see the episode. But it seems that it was clearly scripted. Probably to deter people from criticizing Jada or other women.. Using violence as a form of entertainment or deference is something we should all be against. Even if its done for a woman.
/r/MensRights29/03/22 06:57 AM
25

Its the same reason why men refuse to wear condom. Unlike what the feminists claim, the proportion of girls who hate condoms is roughly similar to the proportion of guys that hate condoms. Its causes, dryness, irritation, sometimes pain too. But letting the guy finish inside her is a weird fantacy. And dangerous one too. I dont think most girls are deliberately trying to get pregnant. (Some do try to baby trap men. But I don't think most girls do it with 'intention' to get pregnant)
/r/MensRights29/03/22 06:39 AM
2

Brain has told in multiple interviews that his lawyer had told him there will be no jail-term. He just 'didn't just believe it out of thin air' he believed because he was 17 and he trusted his lawyer. He would never have got the 41 year maximum sentence. The very fact that his defence lawyer used that as a bargaining tool to coerce him into a plea bargain is enough to consider it malpractice. The chances of that happening were negligible. His lawyer should have been more pragmatic about it. The …
/r/MensRights29/03/22 06:18 AM
2

'patriarchy' and gynocentrism are two sides of the same coin. One cannot exist without the other. That's what I was pointing out from my first comment. I am using the world 'gynocentrism' instead of 'patriarchy' because the latter implies that the gender roles are exclusively perpetuated by men and enforced on women (and onto men as well). But in reality, the gender roles are perpetuated by BOTH men and women. You are the one who are implying that women had no agency in patriarchy. They definite…
/r/MensRights29/03/22 06:04 AM
3

Ok what 'NOT gynocentric' about men always fighting for and putting their life at risk for women? What about men being the 'breadwinner'? What about men always asking out and paying for dates? Opening doors. 'Treating her like queen'. Waiting 90 days (or similar number) for sex. Nobody wants 1950s world. Not even men.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 07:08 PM
5

Traditional gender roles itself are gynocentric. That's why I said conservatives were always gynocentric
/r/MensRights28/03/22 06:59 PM
3

He was told by his lawyer that he will not get jail term. That's clearly malpractice. His lawyer was not punished because the statutory term for malpraxis-suit was over when Brain was released. The lawyer did get punished for another unrelated case though.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 03:58 PM
2

He didn't get probation. He got jail for 5 years.. They coerced him into plea bargain by threatening him maximum sentence, which he wouldnt have got anyways.. If they really had enough evidence to jail him for 41 years, they wouldn't have offered a plea bargain to begin with... Its a form of legal coercion.. Its surprising that the oldest democracy in the world allows such malpractice. A defense lawyer with a pea-sized brain would have known he had zero chance of getting 41 years. His lawyer del…
/r/MensRights28/03/22 02:49 PM
3

He was told that he will not get any jail term. But his lawyer f**d it up.. That's why you should not accept plea bargains in SA cases. Its an eyewash. They only offer it when they have zero evidence.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 01:16 PM
13

They went after her to recover the money and scholarship she got. Idk whether anything was ever recovered at all.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 01:15 PM
29

He accepted a plea bargain. That's why I tell anyone who asks help here when falsely accused. DO NOT ACCEPT PLEA BARGAIN. The public defender and public prosecutors are often in cahoot with each other, and just want speedy disbursement of case. People are often coerced into accepting plea bargain when chances of conviction are zero.. If he had contested the case, he would have been acquitted.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 01:14 PM
3

I don't even identify as MRA, my views are egalitarian and I frequently have arguments on this sub and on feminism subs where both sides attack me as representing the other side. This is the part of your problem. Feminists will oust anyone who speaks for men. If you do not toe their line, you are a 'mysogynist'. Let that sink in. There will never be (and never was) a unified gender equality movement.. At some point, you will have to pick a side. Its about time you pick one. Casey Jaye, Erin Pizz…
/r/MensRights28/03/22 01:06 PM
9

They are not transphobic. They are gynocentric. They always were. The gender-neutral draft bill and this support for TERFs just demonstrated this to the world.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 01:00 PM
-1

http://www.prosecutorintegrity.org/pr/survey-over-20-million-have-been-falsely-accused-of-abuse/ Its about 8% in divorce cases. 11% men and 6% women admit to being falsely accused. Its not as high as 75%, but the numbers are scary.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 12:55 PM
8

Men need to learn how to express their emotions” actually means “Men need to learn how to express their emotions like women do”. Is my assessment correct, or am I way off the mark? You aren't way off-the-mark. But I think it doesn't mean exactly that way. Society will never accept men who express their emotions the way women do. The evidence is all around us. Look at the way society treats men who come forward about being raped by a woman. Or men who complain about bias in family courts. Or men …
/r/MensRights27/03/22 07:00 AM
1

Its pretty much clear that I cant compete with Buddha. He has millions of followers. My target is 10. Nobody can compete with arnold schwarzenegger or Mike tyson. (Or Buddha as you correctly pointed out). But you can aim to achieve 1% or 0.1% of what they have achieved. Its about having a role model and following them. That doesn't mean you compete with them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 05:57 AM
1

I already date and sleep with women.. The idea I give a 'pass' to is marriage or having kids. You implied that people will be forgotten within 10 years of they don't have kids.. That's too naive Gautam Buddha never had kids. But he is revered by millions of people, even centuries after his death. Humanity transcended genetics centuries ago..
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 06:43 PM
8

So, one guy is sex-obsessed so what? For every such men, there will be many more men who are asexual or even gay. Let alone those that voluntarily avoid dating or marriage. He is also stressing the point that I made. Nobody has a right to tell men that they 'should' do anything. Men do not owe anything to anybody. As long as we are going about our own business, not hurting anybody, we are fine with it. Women can date whomever they want or be celibate or single-mothers.. Their choice. Considering…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 06:37 PM
-5

The difference between average male and female weight is only 10-15 lbs. The weight of a bazooka or Javelin is not something training can't overcome.. You think the olympic gold medalists (of both genders) aren't capable of carrying and firing a javelin? With proper training there is no reason women cant fire such weapons. In fact, women are already in combat roles in most modern militaries.
/r/MensRights26/03/22 06:26 PM
2

You are contradicting your own statement.. Quote. Men who marry are statistically the happiest lmfao Now you are saying that 45-50% of those men are non-winners. Make up your mind. Marriage is a win or it is not.... The risk of 45-50% divorce is included in a marriage. Getting divorced doesn't just make you unhappy. It takes away 50% of your assets, retirement savings and 20-30% of your future income for next 2 decades. Getting married and staying married may be a win. But only 50% men manage to…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 06:19 PM
1

They are winners only for an average of 8 years. After that they can't even be called losers. They are 'retired hurt'. LOL!
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 06:13 PM
13

Men do not need women for sex either.. Sorry for bursting that 'bubble'. Modern world gives plenty of alternatives to men for getting a sexual release.. From virtual, to physical to AI. Just like women who can get a sperm donor, a man just pay for sex... Some men even have sex with other men. If you think women have a monopoly over sex, than you are in for rude shock. This is 2022. Its too late to 'dangle the sex carrot to men'.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 06:11 PM
1

My counter-argument to this 'you will not leave a legacy' is simple.. I live a healthy lifestyle. Full of energy and freedom. I have enough money to live comfortably and savings for emergency. There is no one to nag me, tell me what I should do and how to plan my holidays.. . By 3 nephews are already taking a notice. They want to follow their 'bachelor uncle' more than their own fathers. You want to leave a legacy? Then lead by example. Make this lifestyle attractive to the average guy. With all…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 05:58 PM
1

If the 'better' comes with a risk of losing 50-60% of your assets; and the 'nothing' comes with retaining 100% of your earnings and assets so that you can afford a nurse and good healthcare; then I'd rather choose the second option... Its better to have money to pay your medical bills than some 'wife' who may or may not care for you. And in 50% would have divorced and left you anyways even before that point was reached.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 05:48 PM
1

No. They got married because they were winners.. Women do not marry losers. They marry winners and leave 45-50% of them to be losers after an average of 8 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 05:42 PM
1

They remain happy only till the marriage lasts.. Which for USA is about 8 years. Once divorced, they are unhappiest among all male cohorts. With a suicide rates almost 3 times higher than other men of the same age. 8 years of happiness isn't worth a lifetime of misery. Especially, when 45-50% of those getting married are likely to end up there.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 05:40 PM
16

Men have no obligation to do 'anything' for women. Men do not owe anything to women, or even the society for that matter.... Women do even need to date men. They get kids by sperm donor for all I care. Of course, being single mother without child support isn't an easy task. But hey, women are strong and independent. They can do whatever they want...
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 05:32 PM
5

Go and defeat a well trained woman who is wielding a bazooka. Unless you have a bazooka yourself, or an equivalent weapon, you stand zero chance.. Even if u have a bazooka, if you aren't well-trained then you still have very little chance.. People with weapon wins. Irrespective of gender. And if both weild weapons, the one with better weapon wins. And if both are having the same weapon, then the one with better training and experience wins... And if all above things are equal, then may be gender…
/r/MensRights26/03/22 04:35 PM
44

You said it almost perfectly... There are very subtle biological differences between men and women (taller, stronger, higher stamina) do not matter much in modern world. Even in combat situation, where the person with weapon is usually the winner. The BIGGEST DIFFERENCE between man and woman comes down to what we contribute in reproduction. Woman contributes with pregnancy, child rearing, nurturing skills. The man contributes by taking care of both the mother and kids, financial security especia…
/r/MensRights26/03/22 10:39 AM
2

They never arrested him. They only charged him I guess. That too after 2 years. I think it is beyond the statutory limit of charging somebody anyways. IDK about the specific laws in USA.
/r/MensRights26/03/22 09:46 AM
2

No. 1 get a lawyer.. Even if its a public defender, he should be sufficient as long as he is willing to build the case on available evidence.. No. 2. Get a copy of 'YOUR ORIGINAL STATEMENT'. (The one you made 2 years ago to police. Whether it was signed. Whether it was under pressure or duress). No.3. Go through that statement with your lawyer. Did you admit having sex with her? Did they do a rape-kit? Do they have DNA evidence? If they haven't proven or cannot prove that sex happened. And you h…
/r/MensRights26/03/22 09:45 AM
1

Life is always full of opportunities... There is nothing wrong in dating or having relationships.. But getting married is something that does not add anything good to a man's life. Not without significant risks to his income, savings and future earnings.. Prenup doesn't protect against the fallout of divorce. In best case scenario, it protects inheritance and premarital assets. That's about 30-35% protection at best. Unless you are marrying really late (>40 years) or have a wealthy family with l…
/r/MensRights26/03/22 07:13 AM
1

Feminism will not mend its ways. There is no point in flogging a dead horse... The MRM appeals to the society, not to feminists. We have nothing to 'prove' to feminists or to convince them. So, either the society stops treating men as 'disposable' and 'second class citizens' or be prepared for the day it actually needs men. That day the 'effect' of today's misandry will be on full-display.. Until that point is reached, even you know very well that there will never be any 'negative consequences' …
/r/MensRights26/03/22 07:03 AM
2

The only winning move is not to play.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 04:57 PM
2

Not most.. Only a handful of them are enough. Ex. Divorce lawyers, your wife/ex wife, your coworkers, your boss, and your business or political rivals (if you have a business or political activity)
/r/MensRights25/03/22 04:55 PM
2

Prenups do not protect against 50-50 division of marital property. Doesn't not protect against alimony, division of retirement savings. And custody and child supports cannot be stipulated in prenup.. And in about a third of countries, prenup isn't even valid document (including UK and many other commonwealth countries.). This is not a reply to this (im)poster. This is to anyone one reads and gets swayed by misinformation.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 04:52 PM
3

You" are "you" but your life does not exist in isolation, every action has consequences, cause and effect. That's why OP statement makes perfect sense.. Society treats men as second class citizens and doesnt care for our rights ---- CAUSE. Men stop sacrificing themselves for thde good of the society. --- EFFECT. Keep your virtue signalling to yourself. Men do not OWE anything to the society. And neither does society owes anything to us. (Something that they have been reiterating for decades). It…
/r/MensRights25/03/22 04:46 PM
6

The present society only enforces gender-roles on men. And if the man tries to enforce it on women, he is called ''mysogynist' or 'incel'. The only solution is to eliminate these roles completely from the society. That means freeing men to from such roles and calling any woman who tries to enforce it on men as misandrist. Don't agree, then be a doormat. There is no way of getting traditional gender roles back. And I hope, there would never be one.
/r/MensRights25/03/22 06:49 AM
1

Proper use of condoms depend on variety of factors. Age, experience, influence of drugs or alcohol, use of lubricants, etc. Condoms are used by all kind of peoples from teenagers, alcohol-fuelled sex, one-night stand, virgins (experience matters in condom use), etc. Correct isn't always possible under all circumstances. Your solution works only in a comitted monogamous relationship.. It wont work in a one night stand or a drunken sexcapade. Which is one of the major contributors in accidental pr…
/r/MensRights25/03/22 06:26 AM
1

I deliberately kept it vague to conceal my identity.... As I said, we don't deal with changing laws. We deal with helping victims of DV and false allegations of DV. We are not even gender-specific. We help female victims too. But we get mostly male victims because they are often denied help by other 'feminist' organisations... What pedophilia law has ever not been gender neutral? In my country it wasn't. And when govt proposed to make it gender-neutral, it was opposed by feminist groups. Luckily…
/r/MensRights25/03/22 06:13 AM
2

Yes I agree. But it is the least risky out of all the options. Thr risks progressively increase at each stage of dating. Asking out > first date > hook up > short term relationship > Long term relationship >> having a kid > cohabitation >>marriage. Its upto you, at which point you deem the risks too high.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 07:07 AM
5

The only reason its happening is because the players are rich and they have video evidence to prove that she was lying. The courts are biased, but can't be THIS BIASED. I dont think she will face any punishment though, even if convicted.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 06:59 AM
2

Vasagel was developed in 2018-19. The pandemic derailed the trails... Its still in preliminary states. Will take a few years to get approved.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 06:51 AM
0

Actually there is a logical reason why feminists are against male birth control. I come from a conservative country, and here the govt and feminists are actively trying to promote male birth controls. That's because premarital sex isn't that common and birth controls are usually used by married couples only. So, naturally feminists see BC as an additional 'burden' on women. But in western countries, premarital and extra-marital sex is rampant. Birth control is seen as a way to avoid the conseque…
/r/MensRights24/03/22 06:47 AM
2

The way I put it is that, the female reproductive system has a natural off-swtich (pregnancy). Hormonal BC, just mimicks a natural pregnancy, thereby stopping ovulation. Male reproductive system doesn't have an off-switch. The only way to stop sperm production in men is to throw a spanner into the system, hoping to do an 'acceptable amount of damage'. The problem is that, we haven't found a drug that can cause an 'acceptable' amount of damage.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 06:30 AM
7

Condom has the highest failure rate among all forms of birth control 2-12%).... The only form of 'birth-control methods' that have higher failure rate are the ones that aren't even considered a birth control method like rythm method/withdrawal method.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 06:25 AM
3

In some countries, sex selective abortions are illegal. She may gi to jail just for that tweet.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 06:10 AM
12

The women who use it are misandrists. I have had countless debates with both women and men on various topics of gender equality. The only women who have used it are openly misandrist. The more moderate feminists (with who I actually prefer to debate) do not use such terms. They do have valid points. Which I agree to. But the moment someone utters these terms, they should be removed from gender equality debate. Misandrist people have no place in gender equality. (I am using GE as a term, not femi…
/r/MensRights24/03/22 06:06 AM
14

Feminists oppose gendered terms to describe everyday activities. Eg. Chairman is now chairperson. Batsman is now batter. Actor and actress are now common term- actor. But they promote gendered term for bad behavior displayed by either gender. Like mansplaining, maspreading, etc.... Therein lies their hypocrisy. A misandrist movement disguising as a gender equality movement.. How long will the bigoted society tolerate this sexism?
/r/MensRights24/03/22 06:02 AM
1

In my country, they made the DV law gender neutral, the pedophilia law was also made gender neutral. MRAs even got the govt to propose gender neutral rape law, but feminists lobbied against it and got it overturned. They are on the verge of passing the shared parenting bill. The NGO I am associated with generally deals with helping men in false allegations. (Generally marital and divorce related). So, we have no say on law changes as such.. In last 4-5 years, we have also lobbied for DV centers …
/r/MensRights24/03/22 05:56 AM
2

Have you “corrected” any “anti-male” laws yet? MRAs have already made a lot of changes in the archiac laws world over. The only reason we cant change them all is because feminist organizations lobby against gender-neutral laws. But despite of that, supreme court has given 3 landmark decisions in last 7-8 years in my country. One by a female judge. Despite roadblocks place by misandrists and limited funding, we are making progress. People who said slavery was a natural part of human nature Modern…
/r/MensRights23/03/22 07:16 PM
1

Because if he wanted to, ge wouldn't be on the lifeboat to begin with..
/r/MensRights23/03/22 07:02 PM
1

He doesn't value himself less. He values other men less. He will never vacate his own place for any kid or woman. He will only tell other men to give up their places..
/r/MensRights23/03/22 02:47 PM
1

I agree.. In modern society, the state has taken over majority of the male-gender roles. (the daddy government). These come from taxpayers, almost 65-70% of them come from men. It is still effectively male-role. Just that men have been removed from the authority. (Over their own money). That's why both traditionalists and feminists are 'panicking'. As birth rate falls and men avoid marriage, the society is running-out of future taxpayers. Without enough taxes, the welfare stare will collapse. Si…
/r/MensRights23/03/22 02:43 PM
2

Safe heaven laws- A mother can put up a child into state facility anonymously.. The father wont even know where the child disappeared. Yes, she can give the child to father for raising, but she will have to pay child-support. So, women choose the other option.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 02:33 PM
1

They get child support from the baby daddy. Feminists complain that women are forced into motherhood and childcare by 'patriarchy'. But they support a 'patriarchal' institution of marriage where women can be forced into that role. If there is no marriage, most women will not choose to be SAHM, and will return to paid work thereby reducing the 'gender-pay gap'. That's why I said, the only way to eliminate gender roles is to make marriage obsolete.
/r/MensRights23/03/22 02:30 PM
1

I am agreeing..
/r/MensRights23/03/22 02:24 PM
1

The court cannot “supersede” the DNA test. “Fatherly role” means step parent from birth or near to that. Again, no one wants your genes so this isn’t something you have to worry about. Its the bigoted society and misandrist politicians who have made those laws. That's why MRM exists. To correct the anti-male biased laws.. If you can't empathise with it, then you have no business being here. We do not need input from misandrists. My husband is a partner at a big five firm. He is not aggressive or…
/r/MensRights23/03/22 02:22 PM
3

Marriage is what enforces the gender roles, by bringing in alimony and assets division into the picture. Unmarried mothers will not quit their job and become SAHM. But married women do it coz they know that they have the 'safety net' of marriage. Having kids isn't a problem. And modern DNA tests allow unmarried fathers to claim paternity and custody.. Marriage made sense in the traditional world where unmarried fathers effectively had zero paternal rights. But today it isn't mandatory. And marri…
/r/MensRights22/03/22 05:45 PM
2

Fathers do not have the “choice” to be pregnant. That’s what the difference in reproduction is. That's why men are avoiding marriages. If you do not have a choice in something the best option is not to participate in it. Pregnancies happen, and its fair that he pays CS. But if he didn't have choice in it, he shouldn't be forced into fatherhood either. As far as being stronger, very few jobs require physical strength. The vast majority of well paying jobs have nothing to do with physical strength…
/r/MensRights22/03/22 05:27 PM
1

Motherhood is not easy option, but neither is fatherhood. What I pointed out is that men do not have a choice in 'fatherhood', but women have choice in motherhood... So, if being mother is so tough, then women can choose not to. Men do not even have that option. Society already compensates women more-than-enough for motherhood. They get paid parental leave, childcare benefits, subsidized housing for single-mothers, welfare, healthcare benefits, and even free menstrual hygiene products (in some c…
/r/MensRights22/03/22 04:53 PM
0

here's an LA Times article from 2006 about a recent uptick in satis that fall, saying they still happen in rural communities "every year or so." It took me 30 seconds to find. Granted it was 14 years ago, but I doubt under a fundie hardliner like Modi that the occurrence has stopped. https://www.indianexpress.com/article/india/she-ceased-to-be-a-woman-was-a-goddess-6016915/lite/ https://www.news18.com/blogs/india/hemender-sharma/who-killed-kariya-devi-2-11295-739054.html As per official records …
/r/MensRights22/03/22 02:40 PM
5

She isn't.. Unlike others, I'll agree that both her statements are true. Men aren't oppressed. But neither are women.. There are unequal laws only against men..which comes pretty close to oppression, if oppression exists in 21st century at all. But I ll agree that nobody is oppressed in modern times. Not even in backward countries like Afghanistan. Men are treated more unfairly than women, but to be fair, women are also treated unfairly in some situations. But to say anybody is oppressed is taki…
/r/MensRights22/03/22 08:16 AM
11

Reading the stories in this sub have truly helped me on my journey in overcoming toxic gender roles and stereotypes, and seeing the people here share their hopes for equality amongst men and women gave me hope when I needed it the most. It may sound harsh, but the only way to eliminate toxic gender roles for men is to get rid of the institution of marriage altogether. Unlike for women, in whom the gender roles are biologically enforced. (Pregnancy, childbirth). In men, the gender roles are socia…
/r/MensRights22/03/22 07:00 AM
6

but rather because men often pursue what they consider to be “noble” as part of being a man. No.. The men who do it do not put their own lives on the line. The men who do it put other men's lives on the line. The men who say women and children first, will not be willing to vacate his own place in the lifeboat for a woman. Its an inbuilt evolutionary mechanism to 'eliminate male competition'. Do not believe me? Try to say that to man who tells to give priority to women during a rescue operation a…
/r/MensRights22/03/22 06:46 AM
49

If he follows that principle he can freely vacate his seat on the lifeboat for a woman or a kid... He has no right to tell other men to do so. Luckily, I have never been in that situation. But if ever I am there, I ll tell these exact words to any man who says that during a life or death crisis.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 06:31 AM
4

Feminism is a lot of things, but it's not about controlling anybody. Then why feminists oppose financial abortion? Why do they want to control the wallets of the men who do not want to have children?
/r/MensRights22/03/22 06:29 AM
4

Most of the women who would criticise you for collecting these harmless oddities are extreme narcissists who collect clothing, shoes and jewelry in alarming volumes, to feed their never satiated need to adorn and adore themselves. In short, you described an average feminist.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 06:27 AM
3

The most funny thing - our army is oversaturated and refuses to take everyone without military experience. It makes no sense. It makes complete sense. This something I had pointed out in one of my comments a few days back. The modern military machinery is too complex to be operated safely by an untrained draftee. The male-only draft only leads to unarmed men being stranded on the battlefield with no or minimal humanitarian aid... The idea that untrained, inexperienced men will just pick a machin…
/r/MensRights22/03/22 06:20 AM
7

I have no problem with men getting conscripted during War-time, as long as they enjoy some 'privilege' during peacetime.. That's exactly what the traditional society had established. Equal rights come with equal fights... If men have no privilege during peacetime, they have no obligation during wartime. Of course, some men may choose to stay and fight. And some may flee. The principle of equality mandates that this choice solely lies with that man. The possibility of war may be slim, but its nev…
/r/MensRights22/03/22 04:55 AM
26

Exactly.. Women choose simp politicians and then point to them as males to call it a 'patriarchy'. Look how much feminists opposed the recently elected Korean President. If he was anti-male, he would have got overwhelming support of feminists. He narrowly won the election mainly because of his strong policies against North Korea. If it wasn't for that, women would have never voted for him. And even then, only 33% women voted for him anyways.
/r/MensRights22/03/22 04:46 AM
1

Indian society is so self-evidently misogynistic that sati still happens over a century after being outlawed and the legal system punishes rape victims I haven't heard any sati happening in last 50-60 years. If you find evidence, please put up. Don't lie about things you don't know'. Rape victims aren't punished, even when they are found to be lying in ths court. Not even convicted false- accusers are punished. Even though indian rape law has a provision to punish false-accusations. The judge ne…
/r/MensRights22/03/22 04:23 AM
2

the same reason why women settle down with one partner even tough they could have 1000 other males, because that woman or man is by far the best she can have women do this all the time. The reason women 'settle down' is because they want access to his resources to raise her kids. (Her kids, not necessarily his). Obviously men are not stupid to invest in a kid, if paternity isn't certain. So, women have to settle down and be monogamous (or at least pretend to be monogamous) to secure his paternal…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/22 04:14 AM
2

Women can choose not to have babies. Nobody forces them to. Single unmarried women earn 3-5% more than men of similar age. Women have better access to birth-control and absolute control over abortion rights.. Women can choose when or whether to have kids. Most fathers take care of kids too. In fact, one of the main complain of modern men is that they don't get to spend enough time with their kids due to their jobs... Unlike women, men do not have the 'luxury' to quit his job and be a SAHP. Being…
/r/MensRights22/03/22 03:51 AM
2

Melania married trump when he was 59, and she was 35. Trump was already a rich business tycoon at that time. What possible 'attraction' a 35 year woman have towards a 59 year old man? Most women do not marry for money. Most women are not rich, but they still, on average, have less money than men. So? That may be because women work less than the average man. As per US employment statistics, the average full time male worker clocks 45 hrs of paid work per week VS 40 hrs for average woman. This fal…
/r/MensRights21/03/22 06:38 PM
1

The general view on this sub is that marriage is a bad deal for men. So, we advice to avoid marriage at all costs.. (As a man) If there is no marriage, a lot of evils you pointed out like sati, dowry, rape survivor forced to marry, marital rape and DV are automatically eliminated.. I think eliminating marriage, will solve 90% issues raised by feminists.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 06:18 PM
2

Because women don't need to earn wealth, they can just marry a wealthy man and share his wealth. Its an easy way out. Earning wealth requires hard work.. But if there is way to get wealth without doing the hardwork, people would take it.... It just happens that men do not have that easy option.. That's why they are forced to earn their own wealth. Some women do work hard and earn a lot of wealth... But all do not need to... There is an easier option for women, and they take it. Nothing wrong in …
/r/MensRights21/03/22 06:01 PM
1

I proved your statement wrong, at least in America .. Now tell me which part of the world it was illegal for women to work till 1970s? Prove your statement.. I assume you had a specific country in mind when you made that statement..
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 05:53 PM
2

May be because they didn't work hard enough to earn their wealth... Only 3 of the world 100 richest persons are women.. And all 3 have either got that wealth via inheritance or divorce settlement. That begs the question... Why cant women earn their own wealth to become rich?
/r/MensRights21/03/22 05:43 PM
1

Then why do feminists lobby for gender biased rape laws, gender biased conscription, promote MGM, and put forth gender biased DV laws? How does that remotely amount to promoting 'equality'?
/r/MensRights21/03/22 05:39 PM
3

Men do not own all the wealth.. The average man earns almost the same amount of wealth as avg woman.. If you are specifically asking why rich men own more wealth? Then the answer is simple... Because they earned it. Same goes for rich women too....
/r/MensRights21/03/22 05:26 PM
1

https://www.dol.gov/agencies/wb/about/history In 1920, about 20% of employed workers in USA were women. Before World War I, three-fourths of all women employed in manufacturing were making apparel or its materials, food, or tobacco products. The equal pay act was enacted in 1972.. Presently, women aren't paid lower than men. They are paid less coz they work less hours and in different jobs than men. Its illegal to pay anybody less fpr the same job. .
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 11:04 AM
1

OP implies that majority men are either unattractive, or 'borderline attractive' to women in general.. Then they went to rant that men should diet (and excercise, I assume) and get attractive . Assuming all women like a particular 'type' of guy. (Tall, buff)... Well that may be the case or may not be... If it is the case, then if men who do become buff and attractive will get women easily..they don't need to settle down. And those who don't get attractive, can do other things instead of wasting …
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 10:51 AM
7

What about 'believe all victims'? Or it applies only if the victim is a woman? /s
/r/MensRights21/03/22 10:37 AM
0

Why will I be bitter? Women don't owe men sex. So, men get it elsewhere. There's Nothing to be bitter about it! And lonely is a rubbish term.. Not having sex with a woman doesn't make you lonely. Human are social animals. There are millions of people out there. Not having a wife or GF, takes one out of them. There are still 999999 people left who will not make you feel lonely. (Including women who are platonic friends.)
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 07:57 AM
6

That's because one promiscuous woman can sleep with dozens of men. So, she isn't filtering out a few men, she is filtering them out in droves. So, eventually no men will be left in the dating pool. Its not that monogamous men don't exist... But such men are filtered-out by monogamous women. And they stay comitted. So, eventually only promiscuous men will left in the dating pool.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 07:41 AM
8

Do you realise that women aren't a hive-mind and different women may like different 'traits'? Which begs the question, do all women like a 'narrowly defined' traits? If the answer to the second question is 'yes', then does than mean majority of men lack or find it difficult to reach that 'narrowly defined set of traits'? Your original post implies that the answer to this question is also yes. Then my last question is.. If any man does indeed achieve the 'level of attraction' as defined by women,…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 07:32 AM
1

Internalised misandry... All male-feminists suffer from it..
/r/MensRights21/03/22 04:44 AM
1

What we are demanding is financial abortion.. The legal limit can be same or a couple of weeks less than the present limit of abortion... Once the pregnancy crosses the limit, (24 weeks in most jurisdictions), both parents are responsible. Before that, the father should be able to sign-off all his rights and obligations (including CS). Of course, the mother can then choose her options (abortion/adoption/single mother.) after this point. Its her body, her choice, her responsibility.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 04:36 AM
4

Keep your sexist slurs to yourself... Demanding financial abortions isn't anywhere near being 'imcel'... In fact, incels are the people least likely to require financial abortion to begin with... Sexist people like you are the problem, not incels.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 04:28 AM
7

Dropping fertility rates aren't the problem. The reasons why its dropping is the real problem.. Its not because people are planning kids and having only 2 kid/couple. That would be a good thing.. The issue is that, a lot of people aren't having any kids and some are having more kids than they can raise. Each subsequent generation is getting more and more dysfunctional.... You have to also factor in the welfare state and rising average age. (Which happens due to low fertility rate and people livi…
/r/MensRights21/03/22 04:23 AM
14

Read about 'The mouse utopia experiment'.. When I read about ot first, I was surprised at how foolishly the scientific community treated the results.. "At the peak population, most mice spent every living second in the company of hundreds of other mice. They gathered in the main squares, waiting to be fed and occasionally attacking each other. Few females carried pregnancies to term, and the ones that did seemed to simply forget about their babies. They'd move half their litter away from danger …
/r/MensRights21/03/22 04:00 AM
0

It wasnt illegal to work.. More women were in workforce during WW-2 than men, because the men were at the border fighting the war. Women were only banned from working in dangerous places. Well they are allowed now, but still only 5% of such workers are women, even today.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 03:21 AM
1

Its not about scrabble, its about why women aren't seen at the top in competitive games... The fundamental question is raised by feminists, as in 'why there are so few women grandmasters in chess?' etc. We generally agree that women and men are similarly intelligent. So, there should be no difference in number of top chess players. The reason feminists give is because there is inherent sexism within the framework of chess and there are more male chess players at beginner level, so more men event…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 03:14 AM
6

He wasn't staring. He was reading, for which you essentially need to stare.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 02:21 AM
18

Police did file a report.. You can press charges after 24 hrs too.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 02:20 AM
3

You handled it like a pro... By only regret is that, you should have pressed charges. She would have got only community service or a fine, but it would been on her record... I think, its time men start reporting such crimes and start holding the criminals accountable... That's the only way this thing will end.
/r/MensRights21/03/22 02:09 AM
1

You are right.. This study confirms your point. https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4850254/amp/Word-Men-better-Scrabble-women.html Quote. "Research found men are much better than women at Scrabble because they're more willing to focus their energies on winning rather than having fun. Unlike male dominated games such as chess, there are generally more women at Scrabble competitions, but men still end up inevitably winning." Women have on an average better language skills than men. An…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 07:04 PM
1

Now, to make a relationship work men need to resist the urge not to sleep with loads of women whilst with one. And its EASY to play the moral high ground when you have NO or limited options, therefore no temptation. The most successful reproductive strategy for men would be to sleep with loads of women and have relationship with none... If she gets pregnant, she will find a way to raise the kid or abandon it. Doesn't really matter, because some kids will grow up anyways, by some societal support…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 06:45 PM
3

Actually you asked the wrong question.. My question would be, why you need a woman (or more specifically a romantic partner) to do something together with? You can do stuff with your male buddy, or a teammate, or even siblings if you have any. For example I have a buddy who goes swimming and fishing with me. And a superbike enthusiast who likes biking trips.. You see, you don't really need a GF or BF to do stuff with. If you interested in a hobby, you will find like-minded people to share those …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 06:31 PM
2

That's because 'historically' working with machines has always been much more dangerous than working with people.. The modern safety standards are barely a few decades old. For most of our history, workers had to work from dangerous heights and in dangerous places without even a helmet. Despite all the modern safety, even today, women rarely work in physically demanding or dangerous jobs. This reflects in 'workplace fatality gap' of 98% males. Don't give excuse of history. Women historically did…
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 06:18 PM
2

I know that I will never be convince every man or boy to never get married.. But the way I put forward the argument, I think I ll be able to convince a significant fraction of men to completely avoid marriage or thread very cautiously towards it. Honestly, I ll be happy with a success rate of even 20%.. But my personal hit rate has been close to 90%.. (Including my 3 nephews who want to follow their 'bachelor uncle' over their own fathers.)..... They are too young to be introduced to this, but I…
/r/MensRights20/03/22 05:16 PM
8

It is used by conservatives who try to woo male voters by disguising themselves as MRAs.. MRAs do not justify male disposability.
/r/MensRights20/03/22 01:27 PM
0

Exactly.. The male of any mammalian species is stronger and bigger than female, is not to hunt or fight predators.. He is stronger to fight other rival males so that he dominates the area and gets all the females to himself... So, much for the feminist pipe-dream. The truth is that females of most mammalian species do not get a 'choice' which male she mates with.. The male just eliminates competition and mates with her, sometimes using force, if needed. Men are designed to fight other men and co…
/r/MensRights20/03/22 01:24 PM
17

I dont know what is more scary, your comment or your username?..
/r/MensRights20/03/22 01:08 PM
2

The dating preferences of genders are different. A woman generally avoids dating short men. But men have no problem in dating women of any height. That goes across in promiscuity too. Men usually avoid promiscuous women. Women don't care about it as much as men do. Its not that men do not care about height at all, or women do not care about promiscuity at all. But the challenges of short men in dating and promiscuous women in LTR are higher.... That's is not shaming. That is personal preference.…
/r/MensRights20/03/22 12:53 PM
5

I think i'm lucky that my wife thinks western feminism is a crock You might be lucky, but I think it comes more down to numbers.... Women who identify as 'feminists' are statistically less likely to get into a heterosexual marriage.(because of their own preferences as well as men generally avoiding marrying them--due to obvious reasons.) The fact that she is your 'wife' itself makes her less likely to be a feminist..
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:59 AM
7

Wrong! https://www.statista.com/statistics/737923/us-population-by-gender/ Quote "The gender distribution of the nation has remained steady for several years, with women accounting for approximately 51.1 percent of the population since 2013. Females outnumbered males in the majority of states across the country in 2018." https://m.statisticstimes.com/demographics/world-sex-ratio.php As of 2021, There are 3,970,238,390 or 3,970 million or 3.97 billion males in the world, representing 50.42% of th…
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:53 AM
11

Promiscuity in both genders is condemned by the society.. The only people who will 'cheer' you for sleeping around is your other friends (who are also equally promiscuous).. And this applies to both genders... Promiscuous men are often labelled 'failure to grow', 'fuckboys' and 'man-baby'.. Nobody praises them in general.. Same goes for women who are promiscuous. The bias you claim comes from your own personal bias. There is no bias in how promiscuous people are objectively treated in the societ…
/r/MensRights20/03/22 09:44 AM
1

The argument I am putting forth is that 'the risks of marriage outweigh any potential benefits'. This standpoint is easily defensible with statistics and logic... That's exactly what I am doing. For example, I pointed out that married men earn more, but counter to it is that 'they also spend even more'. The money that is left after deducting all the expenses is similar or more in single never-married men. Tax benefits. (They are questionable). But the risk of losing 50% assets in divorce far out…
/r/MensRights20/03/22 08:39 AM
3

I think the best and easiest way to convince a man to not marry is to stick to the argument that 'the risks of marriage outweigh any potential benefits'. This standpoint is easily defensible with statistics and logic... For example, if he says married men earn more, just counter it with 'they also spend even more'. Tax benefits. (They are questionable). But the risk of losing 50% assets in divorce far outweigh 2-3% tax benefits you get. Sex and kids-- You can have outside-of-marriage too. Dying …
/r/MensRights20/03/22 06:42 AM
1

If a man doesn't marry in a literal or figurative sense then he spends his life alone, pursing his goals alone, doesn't have an avatar to act and speak on his behalf, allowing him to effectively "cheat the system" and be in two places at once. A big hole through your theory. https://www.fatherly.com/health-science/what-happens-to-men-who-never-marry-or-become-fathers/amp/ Single never-married men usually lead a happy and fulfilling life. The only drawback is that they earn less than average marr…
/r/MensRights20/03/22 06:08 AM
2

Thanks for making a stupid semantic argument that your incorrect in? A person who cant hold-up an argument without using expletives is accusing me of making a 'stupid argument'. You are making me doubt your intelligence... Also fick du for literally answering questions I didn't ask and responding to answers I didn't give. would have liked for my ex-wife to have been the woman I thought she was but I'm not going to hold what she did against others, her being a P.O.S doesn't make women P.O.S's You…
/r/MensRights19/03/22 06:02 PM
1

Marriage is legally binding. Its not a mere statement. There is nothing to accomplish in a marriage anyways. Prenuptial agreements aren't legal in all countries. And even where they are legal there are stringent criteria (like separate attorneys). In most states, prenups only protect Pre-marital assets and inheritance. Not those assets earned or bought during marriage. Child custody, alimony and CS cannot be stipulated in a prenup. (Which is major sore point in 90% divorces). And finally, even a…
/r/MensRights19/03/22 04:28 PM
6

The difference between sex and food is that, food cannot refuse to get eaten.. But a person can deny to have sex with you... A man needs a bit of meat and veggies, may be. But at any point during the marriage, your 'meat', 'potato' and 'veggies' can refuse to be eaten. At that point, you will not even be able to go out and eat nachos or chips... At least not without paying a hefty 'settlement' for doing so... The last reason is good enough for not getting married. Because there is a 'very real p…
/r/MensRights19/03/22 03:15 PM
9

What has pleasure to do with rape? So you mean to say that it is rape, only if the assailant experienced pleasure? That's a ridiculous claim to make.. 'Intention to harm' is enough of a motivation to label it rape. Whether penis was used, finger was used, or anything else was used, it shouldn't matter.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 09:57 AM
6

As a MGTOW I'll agree.... One of overlooked benefits of marriage is inheritance and insurance... So, even if you legally do not marry (which you should never do in todays climate), you can give her as beneficiary in insurance and Will, so that they get your money after your death. Instead of distant relatives fighting over your assets.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 09:51 AM
5

How does that make him sex slave? He gets his cock milked by a one-night stand or a robot or anything else. Ge gets his sexual release. Where does marriage come in between this? Marriage doesn't give you sex. As far I know, a wife doesn't owe her husband sex, does she?
/r/MensRights19/03/22 09:41 AM
11

I ll tell you exactly when the line was crossed.. Its when feminists started attacking male-sexuality and labelling even normal men as 'predators' while defending women who display the exact same behavior as 'she just wanted attention'... That was the point when, male-female romantic relationships (especially long term ones like marriage) became more risky than the potential benefits they can provide. When was that point? It's upto your own judgement. I think it was somewhere between second and …
/r/MensRights19/03/22 09:31 AM
7

You can't.. The only way to do it, is never get married or cohabitate (in common law state.). If you don't bring woman and the govt in your personal life, you don't have to fulfil any gender roles. (M or F). The whole game is so rigged in favour of women, is that, 'The only winning move, is not to play'.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 09:21 AM
6

Marriage isn't about sex it's a legal statement that this is whom you trust most and trusts you most. Its not a statement, its a legally binding contract... Even of you discuss the roles in advance, what is the guarantee that she would follow them after marriage? There is NONE. She can refuse to hold-up her side of the bargain, and you will have no choice but to divorce her. And pay the legally binding 'settlement', alimony and/or CS. Her end of the bargain isn't legally binding, but your end of…
/r/MensRights19/03/22 09:16 AM
8

You don't need marriage for love..
/r/MensRights19/03/22 09:07 AM
4

You dont need marriage for love.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 09:06 AM
7

Now you explain based on your statistics, why only 3-7% of alimony payers are women.. And 85-90% of CS payers are men? If 42% are breadwinners, why the proportion of those paying CS and alimony not anywhere close to it?
/r/MensRights19/03/22 09:03 AM
19

You’ll get responses that include ‘friendship’, ‘companionship’, ‘love’ Honestly, you don't even need a woman to get these. You can easily get it from other men, or even a dog.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 08:58 AM
6

When you heartbreak costs you 50% of your assets, 50% of your savings and 401k, loss of 90% custody of your kids, and 20-25% of your income for next 18 years, then it's a good enough reason to avoid it. Problem is not love. Problem is marriage. He never said his son should avoid love. He said 'marriage'.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 06:50 AM
5

Because he married to woman born in 1970s (or earlier). The culture has changed. What worked for your grandfather may not work for you.
/r/MensRights19/03/22 06:47 AM
8

How about sex robots? Marrying for sex is probably the dumbest reason to marry today... We live in 2022. They are more options for sexual release today, than the number of food items in a hotel buffet. You can choose what you like. (I used robots as an extreme case. But other options like casual sex, paid sex, porn, masturbation, sex toys, are easily available too).
/r/MensRights19/03/22 06:44 AM
1

He was saying specifically about 'dating apps'.. Women rarely approach a man 'in person'.. Here the double standards are different. (But double-standards exists in in-person approach too). Here, the man is labelled 'socially awkward' if he cant or doesn't approach girls.. But girls who just sit there for weeks giving some 'signals', are not labelled 'socially awkward'.... You are comparing online dating to in-person dating to justify your double-standards.. They are different in each situation, …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 06:34 AM
2

Men do not owe anything to women... They don't have to 'improve' themselves for anyone. Women can have sex with whichever man she wants.. (He will be from top 20% anyways.) The rest of the men have other options to get sexual satisfaction.. Obviously men who do not have sexual relationships, will not 'settle down' and get married anyways. And the top 20% men have enough options for sex. Irrespective of whether they marry or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 06:28 AM
2

I also don’t think there’s anything wrong with just saying hi greeting someone online. It’s a proper way to greet someone. Ya, saying 'hi' is definitely a legitimate way to start a conversation. What he is pointing out to, is the fact that, men availing genuine legitimate ways of socialization are labelled 'socially awkward'. (in short, judged more harshly than women) A woman saying 'hi' on a dating app is 'starting a conversation'. BUT A man saying just 'hi' in the same situation is 'being soci…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 05:39 PM
2

I had highlighted the 'real issue' in bold letters in my last comment. Yet you completely missed the point. The out of shape, awkward men can entertain themselves with plenty of other options.. And the fit, confident men have no incentive to 'settle down' because he would get laid anyways..
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 04:41 PM
1

A minimum bar would be "having a girlfriend who will have sex with you". That is where your argument falls apart. The criteria of women about men with whom 'they just want to have sex with' and, the criteria for men 'they want to settle down and marry with' are vastly different..... Whereas for men, there is criteria only for the latter, that is 'wife'. For sex, most men will sleep with pretty much any woman who is breathing and has a heartbeat.. So, if all men aim to become the kind that women …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 11:13 AM
3

This is the exact argument I put forth when someone responded to a thread about 'men paying for first days' a few back with the classic 'whoever asks pays for the date'. The reality is exactly as pointed out. Girls keep dropping hints, sending messages through common friends or just throw themselves at you instead of asking you out directly. And when you finally respond by asking her out, she wil say 'well he asked me out so he should pay'... That's called plausable deniability.. Girls ask guys …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 10:42 AM
2

Part-2 Are you claiming here that half the population isn't psychologically healthy? I said marriage is trap for 50% people (who eventually get divorced.) Trap, by definition, is something you fall-into by deception or ignorance.. 50% people aren't psychologically unhealthy. Its just that, many people get married without knowing the full extent of the law and its bias. https://turbotax.intuit.com/tax-tips/marriage/7-tax-advantages-of-getting-married/L1XlLCh0m This article confirms everything I s…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 03:50 PM
2

I am posting in two parts due to word limit It's a law based on, like I said, the assumption that either both incomes are equal (both earn 50% of what they contribute to the household) or that both parties are ok with contributing an unequal amount and consider the other party's non-monetary contributions as making up for their lack of monetary ones. You haven't pointed out anything bad or unfair in that. The unfair part is that the person making non-monetary contribution can refuse to do so wit…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 03:49 PM
5

Wow! Respect to that woman! It takes courage to say it openly in front of media... One of the biggest threat to feminism is the emergence of strong women. (Not 'strong independent women').... Remember guys, the monster of feminism will one day be brought down, not by simp men, but by strong women. However feminists may twist history, but truth is that, women were never really oppressed. They had a strong opinion and stance. The modern technology allows them to express it. And fundamentally men a…
/r/MensRights17/03/22 07:03 AM
15

https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/07/07/61-of-u-s-women-say-feminist-describes-them-well-many-see-feminism-as-empowering-polarizing/ This is the study you are referring to. That's a classic case of biased reporting of a scientific study... The data suggests only 18-25% women actually identify as feminists.. Another 40% identify as 'somewhat feminists'.. The total is 61%... But that is far from truth... Only 42% people agree that it is inclusive, and 45% agree that it is polarizing.... A…
/r/MensRights17/03/22 04:15 AM
6

Patriarchy doesn't exist anymore in the west... Somewhere in between last 100 and 50 years, it got replaced by 'feminism'. Yes, feminism and patriarchy are two sides of the same coin... Ironically, both of them harm men more than anything else.. Want to know how patriarchy harms men? Just go to Ukraine and find out yourself. (Or Afghanistan for that matter)
/r/MensRights17/03/22 04:06 AM
1

The beast in 'beauty and the beast'. Shrek Even Anna (in Frozen) falls for prince hans before Kristoff... The media, including Disney, gives a message that a man can be nice to a woman and she will overlook his poor looks/status. But in reality that's not the case. The only two things that attracts her to you are money and looks. (In that order). Women, on the other hand, get the correct message. 'All she has to do is be beautiful. And he will jump all the hoops to get to her...'
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 03:37 AM
2

It's quite telling that men need to be introduced to TRP to be made aware that women like attractive men. The reason for that is the mainstream media and society in general feeds the BS to men that women like smart, sensitive, nice men.. Nobody tells boys and men that women actually like rich and handsome tall men who are also smart, sensitive and nice... The first, and most important part of that advice is completely absent from any dating advice given to men.. . That's why TRP works.. Because …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 07:21 PM
1

Demanding first dates to be in restaurants, to never pay for anything, expect him to always reach out to you, make the first move on everything, predict when you want to start being sexually active, but in the same time not give him any ideas about whether you're actually attracted to him or just leading him on for attention... I think this is the biggest reason FDS has very low success rate as compared to TRP. Considering that the end goal of FDS is long-term commitment or marriage, its very di…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 07:05 PM
8

https://www.nypost.com/2019/09/06/broke-men-are-hurting-american-womens-marriage-prospects/amp/ Quote They found that a woman’s made-up hubby makes 58 percent more money than the current lineup of eligible bachelors. This study suggests that women look for men who earn over 50% more than her.. That's far from the ratio you are quoting. I do not see any evidence of what you are saying.. The dating attitudes haven't changed since 1950s. Women still look fpr a man who will provide her a 'readymade …
/r/MensRights16/03/22 06:04 PM
4

UTIs in boys is rare. Just about 4%.. And most studies claim that there is a 50% reduction after circumcision. You do rest of the math. UTIs in girls are actually much higher at 20-25%. In both genders, the episodes are usually mild and can be treated with oral antibiotics.. Despite of UTIs being 5 times more common among girls, we never recommend a surgical procedure for girls. Even for recurrent UTIs. So, obviously there is no need for boys either. (The common causes of recurrent UTIs in boys …
/r/MensRights16/03/22 01:38 PM
1

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4042564/ Quote The consumption of approximately 50 g of dried shiitake mushroom fruiting bodies could meet the RDA for adults (2.4 μg/day), although the ingestion of such large amounts of these mushroom fruiting bodies would not be possible on a daily basis. Marmite is fermented peanut butter. (The article does mention fermented food products). And the dried algae (purple laver). These are certainly not conventional sources of food. And the article al…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 09:38 AM
1

It is synthesized by some bacteria in the gut microbiota in humans and other animals, but it has long been thought that humans cannot absorb this as it is made in the colon, downstream from the small intestine, where the absorption of most nutrients occurs. B12 produced by gut bacteria cannot be absorbed. It requires intrinsic factor to be absorbed, which is produced by stomach. So, the B12 produced by bacteria isn't a source in humans. (Although some herbivores like cows can use it.) Vit K is p…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 08:51 AM
2

If neither of the above is true, anyone is welcome to find a different marriage where it is. Or even better, never get married. You are talking as if marriage is essential for a man's survival. (Like food or water or something.) NEWSFLASH! Its isn't. You can live a happy and fulfilling life without marriage. Yes, because there's the assumption that either both partners contribute equally to post-marital assets or they both agree with an unequal contribution. The marriage law dictates 50-50 divis…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 06:38 AM
11

If men sexualizing women is 'toxic masculinity' then what would we call it when women sexualize men? Oh... Never mind!
/r/MensRights16/03/22 06:05 AM
4

You will find enough medical literature on both benefits and harms of infant circumsion.. (I am specifically speaking about infant or child circumcision as MGM. That done in adults with his consent would be a cosmetic procedure. I would not called it MGM). The benefits are lower UTI (it falls from 3-4% to 1-2%), Lower penile cancer rare. (default is 3/100k. Falls to 1/100k). And ?query? Lower transmission of HIV. (Query because the study had a confounding factor of distributing condoms to only c…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 05:59 AM
2

I think my most controversion opinion is that conservatives truly do not support MRM. They do support some aspects like fair custody laws, reforms for family courts, legal rights to falsely accused. But are in complete opposition when it comes to issues like MGM, gender-neutral draft laws,gender neutral rape and DV laws, paternity fraud and financial abortions.. So, I don't believe they are completely for MRM. (That doesn't mean the left is any better. In fact, the left is even worse, but they d…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 05:44 AM
1

No there was a logical reason why slavery ended. Even before the civil war, almost half of America and all of Europe had ended slavery. The reason it ended naturally was because of industrial revolution.. The invention of machines made human labour and maintaining of slaves costlier than just buying and maintaining machines.. The civil war drove the final nail in the coffin, but industrial revolution has already mitigated the need of slavery. There is a logical reason why it ended. Apart from an…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 05:26 AM
1

Ok here my intelligent argument.. Humans have evolved to be meat eaters.. Some of essential nutrients in our diet (cholesterol, vit B12, vit D) are exclusively found in animal based diet only. Plant based diet is also deficient in essential amino acids (the 10 that we need). Although its possible to get all 10 in right proportions by mixing various types of plant based diet (cereals+pulses for example), they aren't found together in the right amount in a single source.. (Like milk or egg for exa…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 05:21 AM
7

He is a troll. Go through his comment history... Although I don't necessarily disagree with his comment, but if you go through his comment history, you will find thar he doesn't post here in good faith. I'll take his advice with a pinch-of-salt. Almost a year old account, with 23 karma. That should give you an idea of their true nature..
/r/MensRights16/03/22 04:55 AM
3

The issue is that such articles can instigate violence against men. Its possible that some group of teenage girls may do this to a boy. Or a mentally-sick girl may do it to her BF. Incel websites talk about this shit, and all incels are called 'terrorists'. But when feminist websites talk about violence, why 'all feminists' aren't called terrorists? It may be a joke for the author, but for some men and boys, it could be a reality.. Violence or advocacy of violence should never be tolerated in a …
/r/MensRights16/03/22 04:39 AM
3

The issue is that such articles can instigate violence against men. Its possible that some group of teenage girls may do this to a boy. Or a mentally-sick girl may do it to her BF. Incel websites talk about this shit, and all incels are called 'terrorists'. But when feminist websites talk about violence, why 'all feminists' aren't called terrorists?
/r/MensRights16/03/22 04:38 AM
8

The issue is not that these kind of articles will instigate a castration apocalypse. That's impossible.. What is more likely to happen is this article may instigate a group of sick female teenagers to attack an unsuspecting boy and cause grevious injuries to his pvt parts. Or some psychotic lady luring a man and castrating or injuring him... This is equivalent to some 'incel websites' advocating violence against women which lead to already mentally sick young boys to go on a rampage... The latte…
/r/MensRights16/03/22 04:32 AM
1

I don't agree that men have no choice.. Just as you said, some women would never 'settle' and just stay alone, is true. The converse is true to men too. Never settle, and just stay alone. This is definitely 'a choice' and it doesn't need a man to be hyper-masculine or very rich. This choice is always there for all men, just like its there for all women.. Another factor that is causing the perception that 'men do not want relationship' is the breakdown of institution of marriage.. Marriage as it …
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 09:23 AM
7

No there are more.. I just pointed at one that was recent. https://www.news.com.au/national/queensland/news/suspected-firebombing-woman-dead-and-three-kids-hospitalised-after-blaze-in-outer-brisbane-suburb/news-story/11d6cc170f75f8c58f741bced3ee08c4%3famp https://www.amp.abc.net.au/article/11806410 The one I posted in the original comment was a 'terrorist act'. The others are murders. There is a difference between a plain murder and a terrorist act. The group that you are 'accusing of inspiring …
/r/MensRights15/03/22 06:59 AM
8

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/td9zz5/nutcase_woman_lures_man_for_sex_and_kills_him/ When feminists kill, feminism isn't labelled as terrorist organisation is it? There could a religion factor in this terrorist act too. Does that mean we should label that religion also as terrorist?
/r/MensRights15/03/22 04:38 AM
1

Link to FDS is banned on this subreddit (and many other subreddits too)
/r/MensRights15/03/22 04:33 AM
6

Men buy smart. The consumer economy is dominated by advertisement and endorsements. Who do you think these advts cater to? Women. Why? Because they can be fooled into spending money on things based on 'feelings' alone.. You can entice a man to watch an ad by displaying a hot model. But to convince him to buy your product, you will have to have that quality in ur product. That's the precise reason why women spend more on consumer economy.
/r/MensRights15/03/22 04:30 AM
4

This is one of the main reasons men are walking away from modern marriage.. Divorce risk is still the biggest factor, but this unequal division of labour is what makes men not want to get married. Or even cohabitate. If you have to do all the chores after a 12 hr shift, then better take the middle-woman out of the equation, and do them alone anyways.. It will also save money and free time.. This isn't a difficult conclusion of reach to. If marriage is an unequal institution, the gender which is …
/r/MensRights15/03/22 04:05 AM
2

Many of them are counted as real feminists and actively try and oppose men and equality as a whole. The examples I gave was of taxpayer funded feminist groups. The collective budget of them is probably over a billion dollars. We are ready to accept that some radical feminists who display misandry aren't 'real feminists'. But the issue here is that, even the taxpayer funded feminist institutions aren't any better. The problem is there from top to bottom. Merely pointing at some random internet ra…
/r/MensRights15/03/22 03:48 AM
6

That's ridiculous. If she is SAHM, she should do all chores. Of course, husband should help in childcare. Childcare is actually fun when u get used to it. Considering that he might have limited time at home, he should do lion's share of childcare when at home.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 03:28 PM
3

The examples below are evidence of how feminism as a movement has actively lobbied for anti-male biased laws in various countries. Not just west, but east, south and north too. https://m.timesofindia.com/india/activists-join-chorus-against-gender-neutral-rape-laws/articleshow/18840879.cms https://www.m.jpost.com/israel/womens-groups-cancel-law-charging-women-with-rape/amp https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/sarah-everard-men-curfew-green-party-peer-b1816267.html%3famp https://news.un…
/r/MensRights14/03/22 03:21 PM
7

This is good to see. When anti-feminism starts making profits, then you where the future of society is heading... Soon it will become a loss-making venture. That time we will see, how many 'companies' still continue supporting feminism. Gillette has fallen. Vice media has fallen. The best way to defeat feminist to attack it where it hurts. Its power source -- the simp males to sponsor it.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 03:06 PM
2

was trying to correct an incorrect term that mislabels feminists as women wanting men killed Not just women. Feminists also consists of men wanting men killed.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 02:40 PM
4

Feminists like to claim that their movement is about "equality" and often use the dictionary definition as proof. Actually they dont use dictionary definition. They use wikipedia definition, which is obviously written by feminist authors who want to paint the movement in good light. the advocacy of women's rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes. This is the oxford definition. It clearly mentions 'advocacy for women's rights'. Even the dictionary definition doesn't support these fake f…
/r/MensRights14/03/22 02:38 PM
2

I'm a feminist on the grounds of the original meaning of the term, and I want the most amount of women to be equal to men no matter the context. Go and tell this to those women. And if they don't agree, report their channel and get it banned. And if you fail, sue you tube for gender discrimination. And when you still fail, you will understand the 'true meaning' of feminism. Then come back to convince us about its true meaning.. If you succeed at any of the steps above.. I'll delete my reddit acc…
/r/MensRights14/03/22 02:30 PM
11

I think a fair distribution of housework and childcare should be.... 50-50 for both if both spouses work full time. If one is SAH, then they should do 100% housework and child care should be close to 50-50. If one works part time, then housework should be proportionately divided. As others have pointed out, the most important thing for father is child care. It helps in bonding, plus it makes it easy to get close to 50-50 custody. Housework is to be done by the spouse who works less in paid work …
/r/MensRights14/03/22 02:25 PM
5

Its actually way less than that... https://www.theconversation.com/amp/mondays-medical-myth-men-think-about-sex-every-seven-seconds-4570 About 19/day. So, just over once per hour..... (16 hr wake cycle). The ratio for women is similar though, with them being 10/day. The pubmed study is linked. It ranges from once every 5 minutes in 16-17 year olds, to 1/day in 60 yr old. (As someone has pointed out, that he was much hornier when he was 18-19. Which makes sense.) https://www.nhs.uk/live-well/sexu…
/r/MensRights14/03/22 02:14 PM
6

No its not normal... According to research men think about sex 6 times per awake hour.. (Women think about 4 times) (And get 11 involuntary erections per day- 6 of them in sleep). But if you are experiencing psychological distress, need for frequent masturbation breaks, or painful erections, you should consult a doctor or sex therapist.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 11:07 AM
4

The root cause of OP post is rampant misandry and gynocentrism.. You are beating around the bush to push your agenda.
/r/MensRights14/03/22 10:59 AM
3

Feminists have repeatedly and deliberately pushed for gender-biased rape laws in various countries... I can give examples of feminists actually opposing proposed gender-neutral rape law in some countries, and getting it modified to make ot legal for a woman to rape an adult man.. Feminists are the ones to perpetuate F on M rape. They are ones who promote the notion than man cannot be raped. (by a woman specifically). Feminists perpetuate both 'rape culture' and 'false accusations culture', by le…
/r/MensRights14/03/22 10:57 AM
8

In many countries DV law is extremely biased. A woman cannot be charged with DV in a lot of countries.... You can give evidence of which country M on F violence is 'normalized'.. I bet for every country you name, I can name 3 times more countries with biased DV law. (Including that same country you are naming)... Want to accept this challenge?
/r/MensRights14/03/22 10:32 AM
1

Yes... If that cash was invested somewhere before marriage, he can quote it in prenup. But if they buy a property or make a new investment, then it would be counted into shared property... Also, if he has invested x-amount into shares and gets y-interest. The interest/dividents will still be divided 50-50. Although he can still keep the principle 100% (provided that it was mentioned in the prenup)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 08:02 AM
3

https://www.thehill.com/opinion/finance/567107-the-end-of-marriage-in-america%3famp Only 49% of US households are now in 'married' category.. Its even less than 50%.. Male suicide rate is multifactorial.. Even in that article, singlehood hasn't been attributed as a cause. Divorce increases suicide rates by 3-times in men. (Not much change in women)... Its also higher among married men than never married men. If you want to prevent suicide, 'men not getting married' would be more effective than o…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 07:44 AM
1

Ya.. But men work more in paid work.. Men are also more likely to be breadwinners in the household. You may be earning more than your spouse, but if you divorce, your husband is still less likely to receive alimony. With women being primary breadwinner (42%) only 7% alimony payers are women.. Now some of those 42% are single-parent household. But even if we reduce that 42% to 21%, it still doesn't explain why only 7% women pay alimony and only 10-15% pay CS. The only explanation I can think of i…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 07:18 AM
1

There is no 'out' on homemaking for men too. Most studies that compare housework, show that women do an average of 4-6 hrs of extra house work per week. Yes, per week. And it doesn't take into account actual hours of paid work. Full time work can mean 40hrs/week. It can also mean 60hrs/week.. Workplace studies show that women workers work on an average 4-5 hrs/week less than male workers.. (One of the explanations for gender pay gap). So, men do more paid work, and contribute financially in fami…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 06:32 PM
1

You are implying that men who stay are lazy.. So, I showed you the opposite perspective.. The only thing that can be deduced from that above data is that more men stay when there is trouble vs women who stay. Who works on it or who doesn't, is a hypothetical question. They do less homemaking and child rearing in dual income full time households Women are breadwinner in 42%% US households which includes single parent households (which account for 27% of those with kids). So, men might do less hom…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 06:04 PM
10

https://m.timesofindia.com/india/activists-join-chorus-against-gender-neutral-rape-laws/articleshow/18840879.cms https://www.firstpost.com/india/domestic-violence-act-scs-attempt-at-making-law-gender-neutral-obstructive-to-reality-of-women-3053776.html/amp https://www.deccanchronicle.com/amp/141127/commentary-op-ed/article/shared-disadvantage-about-shared-parentage-system-india It gets worse from here. The above articles are evidence of how feminists lobbied for a gender-biased rape law, gender …
/r/MensRights13/03/22 05:53 PM
15

Isn't that a terrorist attack? So, we have feminists becoming terrorists now. Time to search which feminist websites she visited, and get those websites banned. And label feminism as a terrorist movement..... Oh! Sorry. It doesn't apply when women do terrorist acts. /s
/r/MensRights13/03/22 05:40 PM
0

Both feminism and Nazism started as socialist movements. The essence of socialism is that, you take from the wealthy and give it to the poor. The capitalists are the wealthiest, but they are also those with maximum political power. That's why both the movements eventually started blaming a demographic, instead of the rich and powerful. Nazism - jews. Feminism - men. So, now the narrative is to take wealth from the oppressors (men) and give to the oppressed (women). In the whole process, the real…
/r/MensRights13/03/22 05:35 PM
1

Who is lazier? The one who stays and works on their marriage? Or, the one that runs away at the first sign of trouble?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 05:23 PM
1

So you agree that men are better partners in marriage?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 04:48 PM
5

Most men who are betas will either have to settle or be alone. I don't think there is anything wrong on being a bachelor. A bachelor man 'will be alone' is a feminist fantasy. Most guys have friends, family and social circle to rely on. As per statistics, almost 50% men above 18 are single. Overwhelming majority of them are betas. And most are doing absolutely fine. So, yes given a choice, some betas will definitely choose to be single. (Not necessarily alone). In the end most men would rather h…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 04:35 PM
4

Millennial males were also significantly more likely (48 per cent) to “agree/strongly agree” with the statement that “Men and boys are increasingly excluded from measures to improve gender equality”, followed by Gen Z males at 44 per cent. I am really happy to read this.. This means we are soon approaching the tipping point of turning tables on feminism.. Thats the reason why a lot of women are also supporting MRM recently. Identifying as feminist, pretty much excludes you from the gene pool. It…
/r/MensRights13/03/22 02:01 PM
2

Ceremonial marriage may still be considered legal under 'common-law marriage' rules. Mere cohabitation for a few years is sufficient in some countries. (6 months in Canada. 2 years in some USA states)
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 08:16 AM
3

A legally airtight prenup is basically a copy-paste of the prevailing marriage laws. It only protects premarital assets. Anything acquired during the marriage, including equity on a business or property is shared 50-50 by law. Also, you cannot dictate child custody, CS and alimony in a prenup. (Which generally what 80% men complain about). There is a bit of wiggle room for some business interacts, bonds and trusts, but if it isn't close to 50-50, it may still be rejected... Finally, prenups can …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 08:12 AM
2

No-fault divorce goes against sanctity of marriage. Rewarding the cheater with 50% assets, CS and alimony goes against sanctity of marriage. Paternity fraud goes against sanctity of marriage. No punishment for the fraudster and forcing the husband to pay CS (for non-biological kid) goes against sanctity of marriage. (And basic justice as well). There are lots of things in modern laws of marriage that goes against the sanctity of marriage. Treating marriage for what it actually is-- a financial t…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 08:03 AM
5

A man's money is also an important factor whether he is attractive or not.. Who do you think sleeps with more girls? - The bouncer in a night club. Or. - The CEO of a multi-billion dollar company. Of course, the CEO has a better chance of getting girls. (Look at Elon Musk, Tiger woods for example.) The bouncer does get more girls than an average man. But he certainly isn't more attractive to girls than a rich guy. (Even if the rich guy is old and bald)... Of course, a man with combination of bot…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 07:49 AM
10

What incentive does a Woman have right now to NOT partake in Dual Mating? Dual-mating strategy is evolutionary programmed in women. Obviously it is the best reproductive strategy for women.. To understand why some women (most women in fact) do not partake in it, you have to consider the other side of the equation. The male reproductive strategy. The most efficient reproductive strategy for men would be short-term polygynous dating. (AKA Chad lifestyle) You can impregnate maximum number of female…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 07:40 AM
2

Because men still fall back on women should be homemakers. They don’t get as annoyed when their wife loses their job. Men neither leave their wives when she loses job nor if she doesn't do housework. (according to the study, both factors do not increase divorce risk) Women leave men if he loses a job or if she gets a promotion. So, husband's money is a factor women consider important. Women's housework is not considered an important factor by men. (At least not worth divorcing her) Its not even …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 07:20 AM
5

15% risk of bleeding. (Its only a few ml, but an infant is only born with ~200ml of blood, so even 1 ml is significant) 3-5% chances of infection... 1-2% of scarring/disfigurement. Which may lead to future sexual dysfunction.. Small possibility of meatal stenosis.which is a disastrous condition. And if left undetected, can even lead to kidney failure. (Due to back-pressure effect) 1 in 100k risk of death. And long term side effects include psychological problems, loss of pleasure nv endings, dif…
/r/MensRights13/03/22 05:07 AM
4

Legally he cannot possibly prevent it (in USA at least). Best option is to sue the mother to legally prevent it. Of course he will lose, but it will leave a 'paper trail'. Then he can go to the mother and tell her that, if she still goes ahead with circumcision, he will show all the papers to his son when he grows up. And tell him the reason why he was circumcised, and who is responsible for it. I am sure, the mother will reconsider when faced with this threat. (The son may not react badly. But …
/r/MensRights13/03/22 04:53 AM
11

No.. Because socialism leads to a few elites grabbing all power and then launching a genocide. NAZIs were a socialist party. Feminism is pretty much progressing towards the same direction. Removing the wealthy men and replacing them with women. Demonizing an entire gender. Labelling its political opponents as 'terrorists'. The Nazis haven't changed their methods. They just changed their name and target demographic.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 04:45 AM
1

And not to forget about 20% men are feminists too. And most of trans people as well. Feminism is not same as women. There are male-feminists too.
/r/MensRights13/03/22 04:40 AM
6

Rebulicans blame democrats and vice-versa. Conservatives blames liberals.. Feminism is a political ideology. Not a holier-than-thou social movement. Any political movement will have opponents. Feminism should be graceful enough to face criticism and opposition from its opponents. But no, they censor and demonize its opponents. And blame an entire demographic (males) for all present and historical evils... You know which other political movement censor its opposition and blamed a particular demog…
/r/MensRights13/03/22 04:31 AM
4

She will need you one day No need to wait for that day. If she needs someone someday, she can ask those people she had treated with respect in the past. And if she hasn't treated any man with respect? Then sorry, its her fault. She wont get help from any man. (Except simps and white knights. She can search for one then)
/r/MensRights13/03/22 04:26 AM
2

I will never marry or cohabitate (common law) in life. If anyone asks be about marriage, I just say I don't believe in the institution. Why? Because marriage fails the cost-benefit analysis. Most people invest their assets, future life savings, retirement plans and even kids into a marriage. But in case of divorce (45-50%) you lose half of assets, 80-85% custody and still pay CS and alimony for decades. The benefits (whatever they might be) do not justify these risks. Choosing a good partner is …
/r/MensRights12/03/22 02:23 PM
20

I don't think he had enough evidence to prove his allegations. But the issue here is 'discrimination'. The university should have thoroughly investigated what were 'allegations of workplace sexual harassment'. Whether she was or wasn't dismissed is a different issue. But not investigating the allegations (that's what his claim is), puts the blame squarely on the university. He has valid grounds to call it discrimination. (A woman employee's complaint would have certainly been investigated). Univ…
/r/MensRights12/03/22 01:57 PM
1

Not necessarily. But men surely want to be with a woman who is genuinely attracted to him, instead of his money. So, 'keeping-it-short' filters out the latter.
/r/MensRights12/03/22 01:38 PM
1

Sugarbabies is definitely a different issue. There the whole basis of the arrangement is based on money. But in real life, majority of age difference couples aren't sugar baby-sugar daddy relationship. But there is no denying the fact that that older, more financially established partner, subsidizes the lifestyle of the younger one. . A lot of younger newbie hollywood models date established directors or producers because it gives them more professional exposure or a role in a movie. Its not a s…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 05:15 AM
1

~80% males and 72% women support men paying for dates and asking out girls. So, men do enforce traditional roles on men more often.
/r/MensRights12/03/22 04:33 AM
1

There is no rule which says people should date someone in specific age groups.. The adult women have a choice to say no. If an older guy approaches a 20 yr old girl, she can say no. If he doesn't back-off, then its immoral (and possibly illegal too). But if she says yes, then they are consenting adults. They can do whatever they want.. A lot of younger girls date older men because he provides her with a better lifestyle, expensive vacations, a free place to live, and sometimes pays for college e…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 04:29 AM
7

We all should be bothered when we see workplace sexual harassment. Gender of the victim or perpetrator shouldn't be a factor.
/r/MensRights12/03/22 03:29 AM
6

Try inserting men into a 'percieved' women issue like rape, for example. Even if you raise a valid point like gender-biased rape law, they will quickly attack you and shut you down. But then they will try to insert 'women' into male issues... Typical feminists.
/r/MensRights12/03/22 02:52 AM
3

It diverts the funds meant for 'gender-equality'. In short, it cuts into the profits of feminist groups. Of course, feminist groups accept that funding, but remain silent on male-issues. (or actively harm men). If this information goes public, these groups will lose their gravy-train. Naturally, they will censor it to protect their wallet. Media, and google supports them, because they get sponsorship from these feminist groups. (Amnesty intl spent millions of dollars on wikipedia to change certa…
/r/MensRights12/03/22 02:43 AM
1

Depends on what define 'right behavipr' as. Women participating in hookup culture - may be right. Men participating in hookup culture - is also right. If women's behavior isn't considered predatory, same should be with men's behavior. Hooking up with underage girls or boys is predatory. But if it happens between adults, its not. You don't have the right to police other people's morality. Just because men do not follow your moral rules, doesn't make them predatory. It makes men predatory, only if…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 02:22 AM
1

So, that means we as a society should collectively boycott the institution of marriage??? Well, I am certainly on-board with that view. I'll be happy to see a future where marriage is obsolete. And people just pair-up with whomever they like and have kids. The biological parents pay CS. That would a win-win for everyone, I guess.
/r/MensRights12/03/22 02:09 AM
1

There are no legal pressures on women to conform to gender norms. But they are there on men. (Male-only conscription, MGM being legal, alimony, child support (90% payers are men). (Gender biased rape and DV laws. Little or no support to male survivors of sexual or Domestic abuse).. Women are affected, but they have a legal recourse to justice. Men don't. And in some cases like paternity fraud and false-accusations, the legal system sides with women even after proof that the man is the real victi…
/r/MensRights12/03/22 02:05 AM
1

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kimelsesser/2020/02/12/who-should-pay-for-dates-how-chivalry-contributes-to-the-gender-pay-gap/?sh=8c6722e3fa38 OP is correct. Its 70-80% for both genders. M>F
/r/MensRights12/03/22 01:59 AM
2

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kimelsesser/2020/02/12/who-should-pay-for-dates-how-chivalry-contributes-to-the-gender-pay-gap/?sh=8c6722e3fa38 Both genders its 70-80%. OP is correct. Men enforce it more.
/r/MensRights12/03/22 01:59 AM
3

Yes, but feminists have made sure that religious teaching cannot be enforced on women and girls. Male gender roles (sharing of assets, child support, alimony) are enforceable by law. Female gender roles aren't. A woman can defy 'bible' and choose to not obey her husband. But a man cannot choose to 'not financially support' his wife. Even if he refuses, the courts will garnish his salary. And if he still refuses, he will be put in jail. Tell me how many women have been put in jail for being 'diso…
/r/MensRights12/03/22 01:56 AM
2

If you disagree with avoiding women, why'd you say literally the exact opposite in your last comment? It wasn't my comment. That's why I said, I don't agree with the exact words. But I agree with the principle. But I can give you a completely logical and sensible reason to avoid marriage, cohabitation and LTRs. " That's a way harder argument to attack than just the blatant irrational sexism inherent in avoiding all women at all time That's my personal stance... The reason comes from pure numbers…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 01:37 AM
2

That's why I said, the biggest power is in walking away. You probably still have some feeling for her. Now, those feelings may be anything... love, hate, resentment, anger, embarrassment, (or a combination of all these). Its normal. We all are humans. But you have to pick up strength and move-on. The best feeling you can have is indifference. Its not easy. But we all eventually get there. Learn to let-it-go. Look forward, instead of backward. If you cant do it coz she is still around, then you m…
/r/MensRights11/03/22 07:44 AM
1

You don't have to separate yourself. Just stop investing in society's future. (You know who they are)... Eventually, when society runs out of future taxpayers, all this utopia will come crashing down. It doesn't have to come down to that. But unilaterally enforcing gender-roles on men will lead to exactly that outcome. That acronym isn't a bargaining tool. Its a parachute, to be deployed when we are off-the-cliff. The time for that hasn't come yet. But it will. At that time, you wont find any ma…
/r/MensRights11/03/22 07:34 AM
1

Its not a negative thing. But sex and relationships aren't solo activities. There is (at least) one more partner involved. That means women can choose to have sex or relationships with whomsoever they want. But their choices will be limited by the number of men willing to have either sex or relationship with her. And there is a clear mismatch between the supply of men wanting sex only, and those wanting relationship as well. Its a choice women do not have. They can choose to participate in hooku…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/22 07:20 AM
4

Ok go ahead. Avoiding women is not something I agree with.. But I can give you a completely logical and sensible reason to avoid marriage, cohabitation and LTRs. And I can do it by taking women completely out of the equation, and my argument will still take make logical sense. Want to debate it? You are welcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/22 07:04 AM
6

Ya.. But these same men push for more women in STEM field. And ask for greater pay for women. Where does their 'logic' about biological differences go then? My theory is that, these men behave this way because of feminist and religious indoctrination. Both feminism and religion behave in a similar way. They start indoctrinating preteen boys to worship 'Women' and 'God', respectively. Then try to mould natural male behavior to follow these toxic gender-roles. And when men defy these stupid practi…
/r/MensRights11/03/22 06:51 AM
5

The feminists in India and Israel got the law modified in such a way that F on M rape is absolutely legal in these countries. (The law is biased in most other countries too, including USA, UK, Spain, etc. But F on M rape is charged under lesser crime as sexual assault. Which has lower punishment. But in the India and Israel, its legal for woman to rape an adult man. And it happened so because of feminists) I will never agree with feminists when they claim they fight for rape victims. Coz they ac…
/r/MensRights11/03/22 06:43 AM
10

The article exemplifies the dual-mating strategy of women. Women want best genes (measured by attractiveness) and a man willing to invest resources during pregnancy and childcare. Naturally, these are not found in the same man. Women who want short term relationship, will date only attractive men. Women who want kids/marriage will date less attractive but richer men. Eventually they will get dissatisfied with being with an unattractive man (once pregnancy and child care is over) and initiate div…
/r/MensRights11/03/22 06:38 AM
14

The examples below are evidence of how feminism as a movement has actively lobbied for anti-male biased laws in various countries. Not just west, but east, south and north too. https://m.timesofindia.com/india/activists-join-chorus-against-gender-neutral-rape-laws/articleshow/18840879.cms https://www.m.jpost.com/israel/womens-groups-cancel-law-charging-women-with-rape/amp https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/sarah-everard-men-curfew-green-party-peer-b1816267.html%3famp https://news.un…
/r/MensRights11/03/22 06:27 AM
5

https://www.forbes.com/sites/kimelsesser/2020/02/12/who-should-pay-for-dates-how-chivalry-contributes-to-the-gender-pay-gap/?sh=8c6722e3fa38 Sorry, I ll retract.. The figures are opposite. In the sense, 85% vs 72% women expect men to pay for date. So, yeah, when it comes to enforcing male-gender roles, men are more in favor of gender roles. So, I ll agree that men enforce gender roles on other men more than women. But I hardly see men forcing gender roles on women to the same extent than that th…
/r/MensRights11/03/22 06:17 AM
13

I gave you statistics about how ~80-85% women prefer traditional gender roles. I know a lot of men are in favor of such roles too..... But are you sure 80% are in favor of traditional roles? The same survey show, about 65% are in favor of men paying for dates. And nearly 2/3rd men agree that domestic duties should be shared. The proportion of men who enforce trad roles on women is not even 1/3rd of the proportion of women that enforce trad roles on men. (In fact more men enforce trad role on men…
/r/MensRights11/03/22 05:49 AM
1

Men always have an option which the society can't take away from them. A lot of men are going for that option. That's the reason why you are here. You know what option I am talking about. Hint: its not violence. Its peace and tranquility par-excellence. That's the parachute I am talking about. Don't worry about us. Yes if we continue on this path, we will eventually fly-off the cliff. But men are not the only ones who will have a hard landing. We can deploy our parachute. The question is, can th…
/r/MensRights11/03/22 04:33 AM
6

Avoid one-on-one situation with her. It seems you are in same friend-circle. So meeting her is unavoidable. Just keep it casual. Participate only in group activities. If she tries to get personal, just decline. Do not talk on phone or personal messages. Only reply in your friends group message forum (most friend groups have it). Just keep it civil. Avoid personal qns like 'do you have a GF', 'Which girl you like etc'. It will make it clear that she won't have the old relationship u guys had. But…
/r/MensRights11/03/22 04:26 AM
0

Don't worry, we have parachutes. Mind your own business.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 04:21 AM
16

It's just that my friend circle is advising me to go for her Tell them to mind their own business. Your personal life is your decision. Tell them you have moved-on and you have no feelings for her. If they still insist, tell them you can get a girl better than her. Tell them 'a no is a no'. You got your answer and accepted it long back. If she asks, turn her down politely and move on.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 04:17 AM
6

To answer your primary question -- NO. There is absolutely no reason for you to give her any chance. But more importantly... You need to get rid of your resentment towards her. Lets be honest here, she didn't owe you any relationship in the past. Neither do you owe her anything in the present. So, just let it go. Do not give her any attention. If she wants relationship, just decline politely. By resenting her, you are not hurting her. You are hurting yourself. Just let it go. Forgive and forget.…
/r/MensRights11/03/22 04:09 AM
17

Because society only enforces it on men, while giving a free-run to women. (Read my other comment on this thread for context)
/r/MensRights11/03/22 03:55 AM
41

80% women (feminist women surveyed) expect the man to make the first move. 85% women expect the man to pay for dates. Women on an average want a man who earns 58% more than her. (Way higher than pay gap). Women want a man who is 8 inches taller than her. (The difference between average height is 4-5 inches). The reason isnt surprising..they want to feel like 'small' infront on of him. Yes, large number of men also would prefer to have a partner that cooks, cleans for him. Who takes care of domes…
/r/MensRights11/03/22 03:52 AM
4

He is a forever bachelor. A MGTOW in true sense.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 03:27 AM
4

What I don't understand is that Korean men are rightfully complaining about military services but all of this was put in place by men, not women. Why so much hatred and envy towards women ? That's why they are supporting a 'man' who promises them a reform in that area. Yes, those rules have been in place by men. But the fact is that, those issues can also be solved ONLY by a man. Women do not care. They are more worried about their 'choice' to color their hair and abort than babies, instead of a…
/r/MensRights11/03/22 02:57 AM
6

The issue with you is that you see MRM with a left or right coloured lens. It isn't so.. MRM is an independent movement.. There are mens rights sympathisers among right, among left, among liberals too. (And even among feminists but the latter do not have any say in the movement). Conservatives may agree with MRAs on some issues, but they disagree on many. And even oppose some reforms that we ask (repel of draft for eg). Traditional gender roles aren't useful for men. In present gig economy, they…
/r/MensRights11/03/22 02:51 AM
6

That's mainly because feminists practically achieved 'equality for women' in the west almost 3-4 decades ago. They do not have any issues to fight for. The present issues that are raised by feminists are either- - Non-gendered issues that are deliberately painted as gendered issues. Eg:- Domestic violence, rape, dating difficulties, marital problems, etc. or non-existing or trivial issues blown out of proportion. Eg:- gender pay gap, fewer women in STEM, fewer women getting nobel prizes, etc... …
/r/MensRights11/03/22 02:40 AM
0

Thanks but no thanks... The only thing worse than a sworn enemy is a fake friend that pretends to be on your side.. Actions speak louder than words. Your actions tell a lot about you than your pathetic words.
/r/MensRights11/03/22 02:30 AM
9

Coming from a woman, thank you. Idk how to fix my car, I’m not very strong so lifting things is harder, I don’t wanna catch the mice in my house, or kill the spider... I can’t reach the top shelf, I’d have to climb. From heating my car up for me in the morning, to cleaning snow off of my car, to plowing snow, to fixing broken things, to making me feel safe, to working hard for our family This isn't what we are fighting for. What we are fighting for is equal right or duty towards conscription. Eq…
/r/MensRights10/03/22 04:48 PM
37

They aren't married. So, he doesn't have to divorce her. But they do co-own a house. So it will abe a nasty separation anyways.. I think she is already pregnant. And OP should just wait it out till legal abortion period is over. And then say NO.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 04:42 PM
6

And then make the sperm donor pay child support years later.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 04:23 PM
6

How do you think a male-only or female-only country survive more than one generation?
/r/MensRights10/03/22 04:12 PM
10

That's exactly what feminism does, doesn't it?
/r/MensRights10/03/22 04:09 PM
6

South Korean men are gonna end up like China, as far as dating goes You think men oppose feminism to better their odds at dating? How pathetic of you! That's the main reason why feminism is rapidly losing its male support over last 2 decades. The only rebuke women have for men who oppose feminism is that 'nobody will date you' or 'you will die a virgin' or 'incel'. The truth is, the days of women bargaining political power with their sexuality is over. Men have realised that simping for women is…
/r/MensRights10/03/22 03:21 PM
11

In India, politics is dominated by caste and religion.. Even the victorious BJP govt is pro-women. The gender-politics in India isn't that extreme mainly because of strong family structure. Most women wholeheartedly support their husbands and sons (and vice-versa for men), so its difficult to win or lose election based on gender-politics alone in India.
/r/MensRights10/03/22 03:14 PM
24

As far as I know, in the past conscripted men used to get subsidy in college education and preference in job. But feminists got those revoked because its 'discrimination'. So, compulsory male-only conscription isn't discrimination. But giving benefits to men who served 2 yrs in military is discrimination. The great hypocrisy of feminism. (Correct me if I am wrong. Coz I cant find much evidence of it online. May be its there in korean news. But I cant find any in English searches)
/r/MensRights10/03/22 03:11 PM
2

I understand. But I feel young guys should give it a chance before going MGTOW. Otherwise you will grow old and then develop FOMO. You have see it to believe it. I know modern dating world is horrible for men. But unless you see ot yourself, its impossible to understand how horrible it truly is. (On the added note, you may get lucky and find your unicorn. But they are rare, so don't get ur hopes up too much.)
/r/MensRights08/03/22 04:17 PM
8

I think I'll go straight to the point. The issue we have with feminism is that, its 'central premise' that it is equality movement is fundamentally FALSE. And pure gaslighting (bordering on indoctrination when preteen kids are involved). Explanation- The examples below are evidence of how feminism as a movement has actively lobbied for anti-male biased laws in various countries. Not just west, but east, south and north too. https://m.timesofindia.com/india/activists-join-chorus-against-gender-ne…
/r/MensRights08/03/22 02:25 PM
2

If its takes a nagging, controlling baby momma out the equation, then why not? Men can delay fatherhood well into late 40s or even early 50s... At which point they will have enough money to hire artificial womb and a caregiver for the kid. Honestly, I put forth a situation where women will also be able to outsource pregnancy to artificial wombs. But she will have to do it earlier in life, coz eggs quality begins to go down after 35 age. At which point, she will be at the peak of her career, and …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/22 02:00 PM
-1

Its not as black and white as as that. Girls will keep dropping hints and sending messages through common friends until you ask her out.(sometimes even pressure you to ask her out). Girls do not ask guys out coz they are scared of rejection. Nothing to do with attraction or wanting someone more. Most guys here would have experienced that behavior countless number of times in their life. I have even been pressured to ask a girl out even when I said I am not interested in her.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/22 10:29 AM
5

Ok got it.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 08:16 AM
13

India does have a 'Children's day'. Its 14th november, the birth anniversary of India's first PM. (Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru)
/r/MensRights08/03/22 06:21 AM
7

Wow! I became a fan of burger king for once.. They just gave the feminists a taste of their own words.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 06:19 AM
28

In India, a woman can legally rape a man. (with no criminal section under which she can be booked). If this had happened in India, it would have been absolutely legal. (Although her nursing licence may be still be revoked because its against ethical code).
/r/MensRights08/03/22 03:45 AM
72

The minimum sentences are also 6 months and 7 years respectively... So, a woman convicted for rape can get out in 6 months, whereas a man faces a life sentence. That's how biased the law is.
/r/MensRights08/03/22 03:44 AM
5

But they dont seem to want to fight wars as much as men. And don't want to die in war, like men do. Women can do anything a man can. But when it comes to fighting war, the only thing women are better at than man, is running away.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 06:03 PM
5

The point is, men do take the advantage of sleeping around if they can. But they do it in older age (typically 30-35 yrs). Its not just men that are complaining about the opposite gender preferring to 'sleep around'. Women complain about that too... The difference is that, these women are usually in the older age group (30+) and their shaming tactics are supported by mainstream media. by calling these men childish or immature When in reality, these men are taking advantage of their own sexuality…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 05:54 PM
2

Artificial wombs will exacerbate the problem. Men will no longer marry and just hire wombs to have kids. Women reproductive ability is limited by her age, not by having kids. So, at some point she will have to give up her career if she wants kids (even by sperm donor). But men can delay that by a few years. Its barely about a decade, but enough to make a difference in the overall outcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 05:37 PM
4

Cultures like the Middle East, India, China have traditionally controlled women’s sexuality. In comparison, the lives of western women seem like a dream! You are comparing apples with oranges here. The system in west supports promiscuity is because of strong social security system and govt bailouts for people who F up. If, you know that the govt will go after any man (not necessarily biological father) to provide you child support. And in case they cannot find a man, the govt will still provide …
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/22 05:28 PM
2

I said "in her mind". She wanted him to be exclusive, he wasn't. So in her mind 'he was cheating'. You are right, he wasn't actually cheating. But that is what she has convinced herself and spreading those lies.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 03:09 PM
1

I think there is another branch of feminism you are missing out on, intersectional feminism. (Somebody in above comment has pointed out on trans activists). I think intersectional feminism is better than both liberal and radical feminism, but overall all forms of feminism take an anti-male stance. Its obvious with radical, more covert with liberal and camouflaged with intersectional feminism. But its certainly there in all forms of feminism, if you look closely enough.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 02:25 PM
3

Why not stop being a mother or a daughter, and start being who she really is... 'partner'? Isn't that how to build a healthy relationship?
/r/MensRights07/03/22 03:50 AM
8

If you cant be vulnerable infront of your life-partner, then either they are not worthy of being your partner, or you are not worthy of being their partner, or both.
/r/MensRights07/03/22 03:39 AM
3

Ya.. There was a bottleneck. Humans had a bottleneck in non-african population about 10k years ago. That's a known fact. (It is hypothesized to be due to Toba volcano eruption, but isn't confirmed.) But the number 1:17 isn't directly mentioned. Idk where the author of the article-piece derived the number from? The linked scientific paper only mentions a bottleneck, but not such a highly skewed gender ratio. (I don't deny that overall fewer men reproduced than women. But its not clear whether it …
/r/MensRights06/03/22 07:48 PM
20

There isn't any data to suggest 1:17 ratio of M" :F pairs.. Even in the study linked, the data only suggests that there were more reproducing women than men in migrating population. The ratio of 1:17 isn't mentioned in the original research article directly... That's the only article making such an extreme claim. Most studies reveal male population was about 30-50% of female population.. Which can be easily explained by men/adolescent boys dying due to violence or disease. Harems were probably m…
/r/MensRights06/03/22 06:13 PM
4

There is a post by a woman who stood up for man being sexually harassed by her colleague. Even the man didn't speak up when here district supervised got involved. But eventually they spoke up and took her side, and district supervised had to comply. The point is, it takes only one person to speak up against injustice. Speaking up against injustice is one of features of masculinity. You don't even need to be a man to display it. There are plenty of women who speak up too. Sooner or later the soci…
/r/MensRights06/03/22 02:44 PM
14

So, we should stop asking for equal rights? Stop finding other covert ways (like MGTOW) to escape gynocentric laws? We should just accept that some day we will die in war (most of us wont)? And do what exactly? Worship a woman? Be a step-dad? Be falsely accused of SA? OR WORSE, get raped ourselves? What do you even mean by 'regain our lost masculinity'? And do what with it?
/r/MensRights06/03/22 10:13 AM
1

Still plenty of women getting married Because they get money from it. Its preferable to have a comfortable life than long life. Sometimes shit works and sometimes it doesn’t, that’s life. Ya that's life. But that not what laws say. If it doesn't work, you have to part with half your assets, your kids, pay your ex wife alimony and child support (even for non-bio kids) and lose half of retirement savings. The cost of this '50% times shit doesn't work' is too high to pay for a few years of extra li…
/r/MensRights06/03/22 07:22 AM
1

More like a lot of men died trying to achieve success. The men who we praise in history, are the ones that succeeded. There are hundred times more who failed and were forgotten after their death. Example- We praise Wright brothers for invention of aeroplane. But there were several people who tried powered flight, some even succeeded to variable extent. But the margins were small. Partial successes were riddled with catastrophic crashes. At least 25 documented deaths have been recorded in history…
/r/MensRights06/03/22 06:50 AM
3

So basically he was cheating on her (in her mind at least). How is that a sexual assault? If cheating is recognised as a sexual assault, than a lot of women who got 'no-fault divorce' and went to their AP will get jailed.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 05:13 AM
0

That's because we should recognise biological differences when it comes to pay. Men work longer hours, take fewer leaves and do more dangerous and risky jobs. (Even within the same company). So, these biological differences are responsible for men getting paid more. So, we should accept the 'biological fact' that men are overall more productive and hence get paid more. (Obviously its a sarcasm. But it makes the point he wants to make)
/r/MensRights06/03/22 05:08 AM
10

The male employees will just leave for a better company. Period leave isn't a govt policy. If individual companies start it, its their loss. Zomato had started it 2 years back. Now they are in such a loss that they are planning to cease most of their operations and concentrate on few markets.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 04:58 AM
2

https://www.fatherly.com/health-science/what-happens-to-men-who-never-marry-or-become-fathers/amp/ They indeed did a study. And found that single never-married men lead a fulfilling life. They even have more friends and greater social circle than average men. The only disadvantage is a slightly lower income. This may be down to them not having to provide for a family. So, they do less overtime or do less stressful ( but lower paying) jobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/22 06:54 PM
1

They compare married men vs single men in those studies... Single men include both never married + divorced men.. We all know that suicide rates in divorced men is three times higher. They also lose a large chunk of their retirement saving, so cannot afford better treatment for ailments later in life. The lower life expectancy in single men is due to clumping them with divorced men. In studies comparing married men vs single men, there is very little difference.. You have to also account for pre…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/22 06:49 PM
2

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/marriage-divorce.htm#:~:text=Divorce%20rate%3A%202.7%20per%201%2C000,45%20reporting%20States%20and%20D.C.) This the raw data. 6.1/1000 marriages vs 2.7/1000 divorces. That's about 45%. There is a link which shows rates from 2000-2019, marriage rates have fallen from 8.0 to 6.1 (25% fall). Divorce rates have fallen from 3.8 to 2.7 (28% fall). There is no fall in divorce rates. They have been more or less constant since last 20 years. What has fallen is marriage ra…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/22 06:25 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter