TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

FuckURedditor Archive

View 0 posts and 460 comments by FuckURedditor on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
19

I just refuse to listen to anything anyone who uses terms like 'toxic masculinity' has to say. They never turn that critical lens of female behaviors, only male ones.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 08:24 AM
3

How long before feminists start brigading to hide this info?
/r/MensRights27/01/17 12:52 PM
-3

Distorted is fake. Truth is black and white, and the upvotes a message like this receives only pisses me off and proves to me that a brigade is taking place.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 12:07 AM
-1

Now you're not. You're just raising a fuss to raise your own power. It's bullshit and we know it. Even most women don't really support you. You try to brigade and bully us from links from all. But fuck that.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 12:07 AM
-1

I don't care if the elite take us seriously. Fuck the elite. Burn their houses to the ground, kill them and make the children our slaves.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 12:05 AM
9

He said they'd let him. And most would.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 12:02 AM
1

Left wingers don't give a shit about truth, they only care about posturing.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 12:01 AM
2

ITT: bullshit leftists posturing. Trump will do more for men than all of the Democratic Presidents of the last 50 years put together. I guarantee that. Women are not fucking oppressed. The opposition to this link is why I will never subscribe to this sub. The people downvoting this link will never subscribe either way, but men like me might.
/r/MensRights27/01/17 12:01 AM
4

Let's be blunt: most Americans would have been okay with it he'd run these people over or shot them in the streets. Most Americans are not okay with people like this hindering their daily activities at all. Protests should discomfort the government, not the people. Protests should inconvenience the government, not the people.
/r/MensRights24/01/17 10:26 AM
5

You need dicks to plug up assholes, or the assholes just shit all over everyone.
/r/PussyPassDenied22/01/17 09:32 PM
4

lol, post hits all, gets flooded by people who've never come here before telling us that it's immoral to criticize feminists. Fuck off, you goddamned trolls.
/r/MensRights22/01/17 11:13 AM
8

This is the reason why conservatives don't trust Politifact.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 07:49 AM
12

At this point, I'm perfectly fine with throwing the baby out with the bathwater. I'm sick of Democrats layering shit and half-way decent things so that we all have to eat shit to get something decent.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 07:44 AM
7

I don't think Obamacare is nearly as robust as some of Obama's supporters generally claim/
/r/MensRights20/01/17 07:42 AM
4

Obama was kind of a lackluster President who didn't accomplish much. Even if I didn't hate him for how he handled the economic 'recovery', I don't see how a case could be made that he managed much at all. Obamacare is a laughable program that costs too much and doesn't cover a damned thing--it's unpopular for very good reasons, not the least of which being that it simply didn't help enough people. He considered the TPP to be the primary purpose of his presidency, and the consensus on free trade …
/r/MensRights20/01/17 07:38 AM
8

Somehow, 'open discussion' means not calling liberals out on their bullshit. But I doubt you'd have any problem with a liberal pointing out the ways in which Republicans are shit. Obamacare was a shit bill that didn't cover a damned thing, and which acted as a transfer of wealth from the poorest Americans (the young) to the wealthiest Americans (the elderly).
/r/MensRights20/01/17 07:27 AM
8

Obamacare was shit, though. It didn't help enough people to be considered worthwhile by a broad enough portion of the public. It was mostly a giveaway toward women and old people, paid for by young men who just aren't doing well enough financially to justify it. There's a reason why the 'typical citizen' in Obama's 2012 campaign commercials was always female--there was no way to claim that Obamacare covered even a tiny portion of what it covered unless the enrollee was a woman.
/r/MensRights20/01/17 07:26 AM
7

Liberals have downvoted this to make it controversial...but not one of them had an actual argument to make against your comment.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 01:47 PM
3

This article and its comments are why I won't vote for a Democrat. Those are Democrats. A vote for a Democratic politician is a vote to empower people like that.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 01:46 PM
3

I might not have downvoted you had you not thrown in the 'conspiracy theory' thing at the end. But that proves you're a cunt who can't disagree with someone without insulting them.
/r/MensRights18/01/17 01:41 PM
3

The entire time you've been here, you've been concern trolling and brigading against everyone who posts against you. When I first commented, you were downvoted. Now, suddenly, you're not even controversial, and all of your posts are upvoted in the same 3-5 point range.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 04:45 PM
2

Amazing how quickly the vote totals here turned around only in the places where you're posting...
/r/MensRights17/01/17 04:44 PM
2

You're a concern troll. I don't think you genuinely care about men's rights. I think you only take part in this conversation to go, 'Whoa (yes, that's how it's actually spelled, reddit), let's not got TOO far, you know?' Maybe the judge is a great guy. Who cares? In politics, sometimes you've got to make an example out of someone for the benefit of the whole.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 02:54 PM
3

I'm pretty sure you just want to make it forbidden to criticize feminists.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 09:22 AM
1

There are no 'random' visitors from all. The reason posts that reach all get flooded with feminists and liberals is, this site is full of leftists. It literally doesn't matter what, from here, reached /r/all. Most of the people who followed the link back will always be trolling feminists and leftists because of the demographics of this site. Most non-liberals left a long time ago.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 09:21 AM
7

Anything anti-feminist. The liberal segment of this sub is embarrassed by anti-feminism, because most of their friends are feminists and they like to pretend that anti-feminism is not a part of men's rights, despite most of our problems resulting from feminist activism.
/r/MensRights17/01/17 09:19 AM
2

If you don't think that Ritalin was over prescribed, I'm not going to take anything you have to say seriously. 10-20% of boys did not had ADD in the 90s. And of course psychatropic drugs have been used as 'punishment' before. People don't change, and psychiatrists in the past saw nothing wrong with using EST and even lobotomies punitively. It's not reasonable to think that their descendants would shy away from a needle or pill to get rid of troublemakers. Invoking the bogeyman of scientology doe…
/r/MensRights15/01/17 03:00 PM
2

I love when they say, 'I just can't!', because I like to imagine that they really did have more to say, but became overcome by a triggered seizure and are now spasming out in front of their computers with convulsions.
/r/MensRights13/01/17 02:32 PM
12

No, I think you're the typical reddit feminist looking for excuses to dismiss mens issues. I guarantee that you dont use the massive number of bitter feminists as an excuse to dismiss feminism.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 04:30 PM
7

Yeah, and petty bullshit never clogs up feminist forums... I don't see you making this criticism about them.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 04:27 PM
0

I dont see how double standars regarding men are not mens' rights issues.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 04:25 PM
1

Both good advice.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 04:24 PM
1

Started with the pre-wedding. Big reason why the show sucks lately.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 02:01 PM
1

ITT: reddit feminists dismissing men's issues, as always.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 01:59 PM
1

Just reddit feminists flinging shit and dismissing men's issues, as always.
/r/MensRights10/01/17 01:58 PM
1

Please, the 'it was misogyny!' Line, like the 'Russians hacked the election' line, are about the neoliberal democratic elite not wanting to admit that throwing working people aside.in favor of bankers was a bad move.
/r/MensRights08/01/17 01:09 PM
1

Britain, you really are a shitty, second-rate country at this point, aren't you?
/r/MensRights06/01/17 02:18 PM
3

Feminism is, as feminism does. 'There are many feminisms is just a way to dodge criticism. You all are fine labelling all sorts of people as non-feminist, yet never do it to the man-haters.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 10:54 AM
2

Well, yeah a lying cunt like you can deny anything. Edit: the only reason you're here is to defend this feminist bullshit. You would not be making these comments if a man had gotten off easy. You just wouldn't be.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 10:50 AM
1

Yes it is. You're just a man-hating cunt looking to excuse the inexcusable.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 10:49 AM
4

He had it coming, then, is your argument. Go fuck yourself
/r/MensRights04/01/17 10:48 AM
3

It is statistically proven that men get sentenced more harshly than women.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 10:47 AM
10

You're the cunt who thinks women should be able to murder men with impunity. Go eat a gigantic cock covered in slimy maggots.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 10:45 AM
5

Got a better reason? The reasons she gave were patently absurd, so it's either a bribe or gender partisanship. I don't see what else it could he.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 10:44 AM
1

No, you're a liberal so you think they're worse. It's not supportable on policy grounds. The dems have more anti-male policies.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 10:50 AM
20

Feminism is evil
/r/MensRights03/01/17 10:49 AM
7

They want to get paid money for taking care of their own kids. That's literally what they're asking for.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 01:31 PM
1

Actual science says you're just flat-out wrong. Women were happier under a more traditionalist framework. Maybe YOU wouldn't have been, but most women were a lot happier. This is fairly well studied, just google 'Declining female happiness' and you will find a wealth of information. It sounds like you're projecting your fears and wants onto women as a whole.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 01:30 PM
1

Everyone needs a partner. Stop acting like a goddamned brat. People need other people. Anyone who denies that isn't just an idiot, but an arrogant idiot who believes themselves superior to all of the other humans. You need other people. The sooner to acknowledge that, the better off you'll be. Deny it, and you'll spend your life bitter and alone, but somehow self-satisfied that you don't need nobody!
/r/MensRights01/01/17 01:27 PM
3

Most women want kids. It's not horseshit at all, you tard. It's a well-established paradigm in socialology. It's called 'The paradox of declining female happiness'. The more society caters to them, the unhappier women get.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 01:25 PM
3

Why do you feel entitled to act like a bitter cunt every time a man says something you don't like? Why do women in general feel that entitlement?
/r/MensRights01/01/17 01:23 PM
3

Women want to spend their best years partying, but want us to give our best years to them.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 01:23 PM
1

Single women vote Democratic, so Democrats and liberals do everyone possible to keep men weak and provide women with support in the form of transfer payments (tax men, give the money to women; no need for a husband!).
/r/MensRights01/01/17 01:22 PM
2

That it ever made it to air means that bringing it up repeatedly is a good thing.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 01:16 PM
12

They actually think that just adding 'man' to existing words is clever?
/r/MensRights01/01/17 01:09 PM
33

It's more about men not being held to account for decisions they didn't get to make at all. If you want to insulate women, do it with your own time and on your own dime. Men are far more likely to be conservative because they are far more likely to be the victim's of the state, and so most of us learn to see the Government as the enemy. Stephen King described this fairly well in the book, 'Salem's Lot. To men, the government is the thing that takes their kids away, not the thing that gives you a…
/r/MensRights01/01/17 01:06 PM
4

I don't get how marriage is still a thing when I've been hearing shit like this my whole life.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 11:29 AM
1

Fuck what you're supposed to be. This society has nothing to offer me. Fuck what you and yours think I'm supposed to do.
/r/MensRights31/12/16 11:22 AM
-3

Eh, he was fucking his students. He should have been fired
/r/MensRights30/12/16 12:13 PM
3

There is no county in this country where mildly drunken sex is rape, and I'd bet that's the disconnect
/r/MensRights29/12/16 08:17 PM
2

And the democratic party used to care about working people.
/r/MensRights29/12/16 07:45 AM
10

It's hilarious that you guys are always trying to claim that you have freedom of expression and shit.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 12:56 PM
2

Any time people shift into a defense of feminism, or 'how dare anyone ever criticize feminists' spiel, I downvote and ignore anything they say. I'm sick of this insane notion of folks like you that feminists are some sort of protected priestly class, and that-while every other movement or ieeology is fair game-they are not.
/r/MensRights28/12/16 06:53 AM
0

Wtf is wrong with Ausrralia?
/r/MensRights28/12/16 06:48 AM
10

I'm pretty sure that defending radical feminism is indeed the purpose of that sub.
/r/MensRights26/12/16 05:30 PM
3

And that's why men vote against liberals. You look at a chart that shows how all of wome's gains have come at the expense of men, and you see no issues.
/r/MensRights25/12/16 02:14 PM
1

It also explains why men vote against the democratic party, and why they are so hostile to feminism
/r/MensRights25/12/16 02:12 PM
-4

Never trust a Brit when it comes to men's rights. Or any kind of right, to be honest. A kingdom full of weak cowards who still accept royal rule
/r/MensRights23/12/16 07:30 AM
1

You're a naive idiot. Your advice is dangerous. I'm downvoting you for it.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 06:31 AM
-1

State regulations cannot trump federal law.
/r/MensRights22/12/16 06:30 AM
5

Never trust a feminist of any profession
/r/MensRights20/12/16 03:47 PM
1

Not so much in the us anymore. Only a handful of states still have that.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 03:44 PM
2

Lots of people get conned, though. Stop victim blaming
/r/MensRights20/12/16 03:43 PM
2

The global elite have clearly viewed women as a protected resource, and non-elite men as a problem to be rid of, for some time. Do not trust the elite. Do not trust the UN. Do not trust the government. They are all out to get us, and all of them are convinced that they are perfect, noble and pure in doing so, because we are all filthy savages in their eyes.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 02:15 PM
1

It's probably true. Liberals are feminists. There is almost no division between them. And as much as the liberals here don't like to acknowledge it, if the liberals parties shit on MRAs (as they typically do), then MRAs will naturally align themselves with the right Also, 60% of men vote for right-leaning parties to begin with.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 02:12 PM
1

Australia, Canada, England; these are not 'free' countries in the way an American would understand the term. They are lesser tyrannies masquerading as a free nation, allowing only approved thoughts and forcing ideological compliance among their people. I think it's best to write them off and limit their influence on us as best as possible. i fear that if we emulate the good parts of their systems (health care, education) we will only give encouragement to those who want to bring the rest of it (…
/r/MensRights15/12/16 02:08 PM
4

Wow. The Green Party is just a wretched piece of shit all over the world, isn't it?
/r/MensRights15/12/16 02:04 PM
6

Comments have been disabled for this story. As always, the media elite won't allow any possibility that feminism or government policies regarding domestic violence may be criticized.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 02:03 PM
11

What's it like to be a subhuman cuntbeast?
/r/MensRights15/12/16 02:01 PM
9

The law is the law. She broke the law, then she deserves the same punishment as a man for doing the same. If you don't like the law, then change the law. Stop advocating that people just ignore the law--because it comes off as something people only really do when a woman is arrested. i just don't believe that you would have made this comment about a man's arrest. You may have still felt it, but i don't think you'd have said it.
/r/MensRights15/12/16 01:59 PM
1

Why should we believe your random weblink over his?
/r/MensRights14/12/16 06:56 AM
5

The white knights of reddit don't care. They like to say that others are ignorant of women, but they say shit that really makes me wonder if they have ever even met one.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 07:44 AM
2

The 20 year olds who are coonvinced that they are wise old men disagree with you, and have no shortage of downvotes. You are so very right though
/r/MensRights13/12/16 07:41 AM
8

Im 34. It fits me life experience perfectly. You're the one who sounds like a kid who refuses to accept the world as it is.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 07:39 AM
4

I don't believe you. In my experience, this sort of shit comes overwhelmingly from women. No man has said anything remotely like that to me since I was a child.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 07:38 AM
3

I don't believe them. I think they believe it, but its so far outside of my experience with women that I assume she's lying to herself as much as she is to us. None of us is who we'd like to think we are. And I've seen far, far too many women prod a man to open up to them, only to stab said men in the back over it.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 07:36 AM
13

No there wasn't.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 09:48 AM
5

They dont deserve to get paid equally if they are inerior workers.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 09:47 AM
1

It isn't. They know you'll assume that . That's why it's a lie.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 09:47 AM
6

No feminist has been able to explain to me why someone who can lift and carry half of what I can, should be paid as much as i do in a job that involves lifting and carrying. Add to that the number of jobs--or just tasks within a job--that are dangerous or gross, which most women will flatly refuse to do. So why should someone who cant do as well as I can and who wont do all that I'll do, get paid what I can get paid. If I can or will do 30% more work, i deserve commensurately more pay.
/r/MensRights12/12/16 09:45 AM
18

'15 died in a fire tonight, including 5 women and 3 children' is how we typically talk, you fucking liar. Women and kids are always the focus. Men are always the afterthought.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 10:40 AM
1

But they dont always talk about how violence impacts men. We always scream,' wont someone think of the women'. Shit, even without violence... 12 people die in a flood, and they act like the men were supposed to die, while the women and children get singled out for special consideration.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 10:38 AM
17

'Men, don't vote for us!'
/r/MensRights10/12/16 10:07 AM
88

MTV is a rad-fem shithole.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 10:05 AM
6

But he never put his dick in her, so... You are a tard who doesn't know what he's talking about.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 10:04 AM
7

No, not rape. You have no idea what he did, do you?
/r/MensRights10/12/16 10:03 AM
5

I want kids someday. And maybe after this kind of thing, women won't be so damned entitled to believe that everything should be their way.
/r/MensRights10/12/16 10:00 AM
1

I dont believe that you're anyting but a man-hating cunt feminist taking potshots. You wouldn't even be here if it wasn't for the pro-feminist circle jerk on /r/all. One thats only existed since the repeated ideogical purges on this site.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 10:23 AM
1

They dont care. This isnt about the age of consent to them--thats just the peg they're hanging their hat ob. All they care about is gender. Man=evil, Wom=misguided at worst.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 10:21 AM
1

Man hating cunt
/r/MensRights09/12/16 10:20 AM
2

A lot of man-hating cunt feminists making excuses for them. This is why we hate you.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 10:20 AM
1

But you're fine with female teacher abusing boys. Teachers cant have sex with students in Texas, by the same logic kids cant have sex with 'adults'. I dont believe any of you feminists lying and claiming yoy only care about word choices.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 10:18 AM
2

Maybe you whackjobs should stop trying to suffocate teenaged boys self esteem, and stop trying to make women fear men. Fucking scumbag feminazi.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 11:06 AM
4

The feminazis flooding in from/r/all would say society. But thats why they are crazy, and no one shouldnlisten to them.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 11:05 AM
2

Thats exctly what this is abour: making women hate and fear men, while destroying the self esteem of teenage boys.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 11:01 AM
5

Only a fucking cunt like you could act like 'teach men not to rape!' Isnt about men. If anyone even kind of suggested doing anything similar to damage a teenage girl's self esteem, twats like you would go apeshit.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 11:00 AM
3

It will never cease to amaze me how many redditors will defend the indefensible. Thank god we elected Trump to put an end to this kind of nonsense. God knows that the same liberals who will keen and wail for decades about girls self esteem and treating women with respect, wont say a damned word when feminists start shitting all over our sons in these ideological 'consent' classes. A boys sense of self worth is a danger in the eyes of the liberal feminist. It must be crushed, in their eyes, at an…
/r/MensRights06/12/16 10:57 AM
0

No it doesnt. You feminazis just hate little boys and get off on shitting all over them. No female teacher, and especially no feminist teachers, should be involved with anything like this. I do not trust them, and i would demand that my child be excused from you ideological indoctrination class.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 10:54 AM
2

There is no great rape epidemic, though. Crime rates, including rape, are at historic lows. And among violent crimes, only murder is rarer than rape. Its a rare crime, no matter what feminist lies about '1 in 4'. That is not remotely accurate. So if a bigotted group (like feminists, and no matter what you think of feminism, you must have noticed that many feminisits have issues with men) wants to do something like this about a rare problem, you can be assured that maiming boys psychologically is…
/r/MensRights06/12/16 10:51 AM
1

Jesus christ, you fucking feminists really do think that every little boy is a monster waiting to happen. Never trust these people. They hate you. Everything they do comes from that. Everything they do will be about making men and boys feel like shit.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 10:45 AM
1

Just another feminazi making excuses to justify shitting on little boys. Fuck off, man hate r.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 10:42 AM
3

People like yoy are why i hate feminists.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 10:40 AM
2

Both are very rare. Rape is the rarest violent crime besides murder.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 10:40 AM
2

It never ceases to amaze ke how many redditorz will outright lie to defend this, saying things like 'its just satire mocking the idea that women should take responsibility for their own safety', while they can damn well see in the rest of this discussion that plenty of people mean it. Every feminist hates men. Or they wouldn't be feminists.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 10:39 AM
12

Feminists are always whining about Death Threats that never happened. Any time anyone criticizes them for anything, they start shrieking about death threats. But somehow, these threats never fet reported or proven.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 10:27 AM
2

Worker's rights are for all workees, not just some of them. I'm tired, as a man, of making less money because women work, while watching them suck at hard labor while having to p ick up the slack for them.
/r/MensRights04/12/16 09:41 AM
1

A three hour shot of a dog taking a shot would do well with the star wars name.
/r/MensRights03/12/16 12:16 PM
1

You guys are literally all over this site, calling Trump Hitler and all of his voters racist, sexist, subhuman filth. So excuses me if I see your entreaties as hollow and self-serving.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 12:05 PM
2

ITT: the same butthurt liberals who rant about how evil Republicans are, sperging out over every slight criticism of feminism, liberalism or the Democratic party. Tell us again why its wrong to blame democrats for the sexist ACA, just after you got done screaming that Trump is Hitler.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 12:02 PM
1

Thats not an argument, thats someones schizophrenia.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 11:55 AM
2

Wow, the amount of butthurt democrats is making this sub u usuable. They literally throw a fit any time anyone criticizes feminists, democrats or says anything positive about a non-lefty
/r/MensRights02/12/16 11:51 AM
0

That has nothing to do with mens issues.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 11:50 AM
1

There is clearly a lot of femi ist brigading happening in this thread, along with the results of reddits years-long purge of conservatives. So you end with a bunch of phonies and concern trolls.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 11:49 AM
0

Not plenty from what ive seen. Like, 99% of the left hates men and are hostile to mens rights. If you dont like it, take it up with them. But until they stop treating us like goblins and vampires, the left will be our enemy.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 11:48 AM
7

Its okay to generalize about ideologies, because ideologies hold tennets of belief. Feminists believe in rape culture and patriarchy, which are both anti-male conspiracy theories.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 11:45 AM
2

Most wome hate femism. Trying to conflate the tw proves your dishonesty.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 11:43 AM
9

I was with you until you started shilling for feminism. I wil not support those man-hating freaks.It will never end well to support people who hate you.
/r/MensRights02/12/16 11:42 AM
2

There is no such thing as an ethical feminist teacher.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 10:35 AM
2

All of history says that only men will be affected. Bury your head in the sand if you'd like. I'm not an idiot.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 02:58 PM
1

Imgur, like reddit, is run by radical feminists, with all of the biases innate to that set.
/r/MensRights24/11/16 01:27 PM
1

Turnout was up from 2012
/r/MensRights19/11/16 11:08 AM
2

If this is true, then howndid all of previous human history happen?
/r/MensRights19/11/16 11:05 AM
3

Said by one of the most priveleged women on the planet
/r/MensRights19/11/16 11:03 AM
1

That is a very convenient way for a liberal to look at it.
/r/MensRights19/11/16 11:03 AM
1

So should someone be jailed over the fact someone else thinks they started a nasty rumour? No. In a lot of countries, yes. And it should probably be that way here, too.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 12:02 PM
1

ITT: Liberals demanding that a Republican President hire liberal advisors and continue Obama's policies... Because elections shouldn't matter or something.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 12:01 PM
-1

And you think 'He needs to hire a liberal, even though he was elected by conservatives' is not a bias?
/r/MensRights14/11/16 12:00 PM
2

Well, Trump is President, and the people who elected him don't want him to have Democratic advisors. A lot of people have this problem with Democracy, where they think votes should be held, but that it should have no impact on policy whatsoever. A Republican President was just elected. Expect policies favored by the people who elected him, not by those of you who stood in his way. A lot of people didn't trust Obama, either, and you just screamed 'RACIST!' at them. You didn't invite them to have …
/r/MensRights14/11/16 11:59 AM
1

Oh well? So long as the rest of the liberals defend the feminists and cling to them as a way to 'prove' how liberal they are without ever having to challenge the power centers of this system, then yes, it's going to be lefty bashing. They stand with our enemies. That makes them our enemies.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 11:56 AM
4

The receiving country just voted fairly decisively against this kind of thing.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 11:49 AM
14

Men are never included when liberals mention 'families'. Everyone has to realize that at this point.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 11:48 AM
2

Maybe if I trusted the police more. But no, I don't want that white-knight brigade to 'investigate' this boy, decide that he must be guilty, and then frame him somehow. Or simply punish him because they think he's guilty.
/r/MensRights12/11/16 11:37 AM
2

Never trust a feminist notnto be a monster
/r/MensRights04/11/16 09:47 AM
2

Youre a real cunt if you think thats okay
/r/MensRights04/11/16 09:46 AM
1

Family law is corrupt as fuck, it wouldn't really be a shock if the court just decided to ignore the law, with the judge hoping that this man wouldn't have the wherewithal to continue the legal fight. Too often, you 'court' types like to assume that you're all decent people, even in the face of overwhelming evidence that many of you are abusive assholes. You're as bad as cops when it comes to covering each others asses.
/r/MensRights31/10/16 11:43 AM
1

Feminists get that everyone hates them, too, right? Like, if there was a poll taken, most people would shit both MRAs AND Feminists off directly into the heart of the sun? Everything Feminists hate about MRAs, normal people already hate about Feminists.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 05:36 PM
2

So a troll, then. I'm fine with it, but call it what it is.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 05:32 PM
1

Never underestimate another person's stupidity.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 05:32 PM
1

is Change.org good for anything other than allowing lefites to sperg out every time someone says something they don't like?
/r/MensRights30/10/16 05:31 PM
4

CTR has to spend the last of its money before the election.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 12:48 PM
0

I'm going to laugh when, after a year of them screaming 'CHEETO HITLER!', HRC turns out to be the Democratic McCarthy, Nixon and Wilson all rolled into one.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 12:48 PM
7

In theory, yes. In practice, given human social dynamics, no. Don't apply logic to human behavior, because humans are beasts of instinct. Their behavior will not obey logic. Their behavior will obey the rules of their own instincts. All kinds of 'fallacies' in logic fail when applied to human behavior. The slippery slope, for instance--of course, in theory, one can stop at any point in the descent. But group dynamics and human psychology means that it's incredibly unlikely that humans will ever …
/r/MensRights30/10/16 12:42 PM
2

Has anything changed? The children on this sub are fucking retarded. 'An issue can be an issue only for one day, and one day only. Any attempt to bring it up again must be met with autists screeching like howler monkeys!'
/r/MensRights30/10/16 07:10 AM
0

Only because this sub has its head up its ass and is 'choosing' to interpret this in the most favorable possible light. chances are, if a man tried to use the 'family' bathroom, he'd be kicked out. But we're all going to pretend that he won't, for god only knows what reason.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 07:07 AM
15

No, she's no hero. Abandoning the people you're supposed to care about to play games she should have played in her 20s if she wanted to play them, is not heroic. If I abandon my wife and child to go play Peace Corps, nobody would call me a hero for doing it.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 07:00 AM
19

No group genuinely stronger than another group, has to repeatedly say it. No such group has to jerk each-other off over an obvious truth. Women are not stronger than men. Physically, that's just a laugh. Emotionally...well, Men haven't been the ones shrieking about how people on TV hurt their feelings and make them feel inferior, now have we?
/r/MensRights29/10/16 02:52 PM
9

The UK is like some kind of anti-male, anti-free speech dystopia at this point.
/r/MensRights29/10/16 02:50 PM
6

Some of them, too many sound serious though, and I have enough experience with that shit sub to know that at least half of the comments you think are tongue-in-cheek, aren't really. That type has a way to pretend to mean something satirically, but really they take it 100% serious and just hope you find it 'funny'.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 08:06 AM
13

That sub is a man-hating shithole, and more than anything else, convinced me not to ever bother with a site like OKCupid.
/r/MensRights28/10/16 08:02 AM
-10

The world owes America a great debt. First, we rebelled against that shithole of an empire. Then, we stood by and did nothing as it was dismantled by the Japanese, stepping in only after the Britain's back was broken. We saved the world from three wretched empires in that war. We always talk about the Japanese and the Germans. But we forget that we could have salvaged much of the British Empire had we chosen to. We wisely did not. Edit: The British Empire was evil as fuck. There's no denying tha…
/r/MensRights27/10/16 01:10 PM
3

I don't believe for a second that this is 'the issue'. I think you're some asshole coming in here from /r/all, who hates this sub, and who is nitpicking to find things to 'take issue' with.
/r/MensRights27/10/16 05:34 AM
16

I'm sure that you know so much better than the judge and jury in this case, that heard all of the facts and evidence. why the fuck are you all so goddamned retarded?
/r/MensRights27/10/16 05:33 AM
1

It may be real, but I dismiss any claims of 'misogyny' given how commonly the term is trotted out whenever a woman is being held to account, or even simply being criticized. Punish two people, one a man and one a woman, for the same crime identically. I guarantee you the self-righteous women's studies types will say nothing about the man's sentence while declaring the woman's a symptom of societies harsher treatment of women. As long as that's true, I'm not even going to hear people out unless t…
/r/MensRights26/10/16 09:40 AM
1

No, but you did have a feminist ruler who ran your left-wing party into the ground. We have a shitty choice in leaders right now, but your system isn't actually better in any way, so... I mean, it's not like you've got some awesome, more democratic method of picking a ruler. You're not one of those countries. You've got the same shitty parliamentary system the rest of Oceania has, and that's actually a step down in terms of representation. Plus, your ACTUAL leader is geriatric woman sitting on a…
/r/MensRights26/10/16 09:36 AM
1

Do any of the default subs do this? Because organizing around that would be relatively effective.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 09:23 AM
11

The issue wasn't the evidence was not good it's that he didn't know how to use the evidence. This sounds like a serious problem with this justice system. 'Sure, you have proof! but you didn't use the right words or kiss my ass enough, so we're ignoring your proof.'. Scum like you are why people hate lawyers.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 08:56 AM
3

I guarantee you that this was it (people, who are mostly kids here and have parents to borrow from, will say 'borrow, steal whatever!'). This sub loves to blame men from broader problems with society, like the fact that the 'justice' system is pay-to-play, or the fact that it's set up to make men fail.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 08:55 AM
0

If they don't even have the right to face your accuser, why would assume that these fucking primates have public defenders? I'm not even sure they have a right to jury trials at this point.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 12:39 PM
3

Wow, Australia doesn't even have the right to face your accuser in criminal law. What else don't you primitives have? The presumption of innocence? Can they still use secret evidence against you in court? Can the judge set aside not guilty verdicts and decided to convict over the wisdom of the jury? It's like a third-world shithole over there.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 12:38 PM
30

I love how people like to say, 'We support free speech, but not really'. If you don't believe in the right to say things that sometimes piss people off--righteously or not--then you don't believe in freedom of speech and you should probably stop lying to other people.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 12:35 PM
18

American venues believe in freedom of speech. Australia, as a culture, does not really possess the concept, though they often pretend to--like most of Europe, they have 'free speech lite', which of course isn't free speech at all.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 12:32 PM
3

Feminists are truly the scum of this earth.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 12:31 PM
1

People said that when I was a kid. It wasn't really true then in most things, just peewee baseball and a bowling and shit like that. Most things, I remember you know who won and who lost. If you failed horribly, you were told.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 04:18 PM
4

I wish I could call this hyperbole, but given the way the left-wing media treat men, I just can't at this point.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 08:12 AM
3

I guarantee you that we won't be one of her 'urgent' problems at all, not in this way. She'll use all of her power to help women, let men rot, and the broader Democratic party will applaud her for it. I will never vote for a Democrat again in my life after this.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 08:12 AM
3

It's hard not to fear a feminism future when feminists make up 18% of the population and are widely despised by everything, but the elite keep shoving feminism down out throats throughout the culture. It feels like fascism, to be honest. Because they aren't trying to win any battlefield of ideas. They're trying to get the elite to force feminism on us from outside.
/r/MensRights24/10/16 08:04 AM
3

If it helps, any mention of them on any male-oriented sub is automatically downvoted by most of the men on reddit. Even men who don't care much for MRAs still hate MensLibs types more.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 12:27 PM
7

Which is why they need to be take a hit. Because if not, they'll just keep thinking that they were in the right and it's just the evil rape-patriarchy culture that screwed them over.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 12:26 PM
5

Okay, being hateful and bigotted toward men is not 'addressing the plight of men'. Saying how sad she is that we're all slathering beasts, and musing how we can have our wings clipped so that we can be brought to heel, is not an honest concern for men. It's a hatred of us.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 12:23 PM
4

Unless she has rescinded her opinion, I don't see how it matters.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 12:22 PM
1

I don't owe it to some random woman to lay down my life for her. My wife, my daughter, maybe other female relatives if I so choose, but not every woman. If some woman is in danger, and the only way to save her is to put myself in danger, I'm not going to do it just because she's a woman. I don't owe her that, any more than she owes me a blowjob every time I get a hard on just because she's a woman.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 02:20 PM
1

Yeah, it's honestly personally offensive that they think they can just spit in our faces with such blatant dishonesty and still have any kind of credibility left. I'm sure it gives them their jollies, to mock us and laugh and point while going, 'You can't prove this was us! you can't prove this was us!', but that's the perception their giving off, not noble defends of truth, but disgusting bullies who scream, 'LOL, WHY DO YOU KEEP HITTING YOURSELF?'.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 02:17 PM
1

You people are patently dishonest. Who else would be doing this? Who else advocates for 'Teach men not to rape!' (that, when called on it, you feminists claim is just satire about female rape prevention programs...but which somehow seem to make it into the real world despite this). You're a liar. you know damned well who advocates putting little boys in a room and screaming 'RAPIST' and 'RACIST!' at them. It isn't the social conservatives or the Christians or the moonies or the scientologists. I…
/r/MensRights22/10/16 02:15 PM
5

The polls are like 39-42, 42-46. That's not an election that's sown up. That's an election where a lot of people are flat-out lying to pollsters. Anyone who thinks that HRC is going to win George or Arizona, or that polls indicating that she will (all of which have her at sub 45% when she's 'winning') are accurate, just aren't being realistic. Go back through the records and look at where most elections stand right now: 48-48, 44-48, 48-52, etc. You don't get numbers with 10-15% undecideds a wee…
/r/MensRights22/10/16 05:41 AM
14

Democrats always win women by 20%, Republicans always win men by 20%. This is the norm, and has been for over 30 years now. Democrats act like it's 'proof' of conservative misogyny, but will never acknowledge that they lose men by as much as Republicans lose women. Because Democrats think women's votes count for extra or something.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 05:39 AM
2

The point of it, is a bunch of man-hating whackjobs getting off on the idea of shitting all over young boys.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 05:20 AM
3

Then you're a crazy, man-hating feminism who thinks men are evil pigs that need to be 'taught' not to hate women. Probably because nobody taught you not to hate men, and that's where you ended up.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 05:17 AM
1

An saying that half of men beat their wives and girfriends like the crazy person you are. 'Waah!!! you don't care about the same things I do, and that makes you children!" Grow the fuck up.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 05:12 AM
0

CBS, television for geriatrics.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 09:47 PM
6

When you said that it was natural for men to take a hit, and therefore it women shouldn't be taught not to hit men. What fucking implication did you mean for people to get from that? Are you too fucking retarded to understand the logical result of your argument. 'Men are naturally built to be abused' 'you can never hit a woman' 'women don't need to be taught not to hit men'. Those are your arguments. They add up to a very obvious conclusion--one that you are apparently too stupid to understand t…
/r/MensRights21/10/16 06:55 PM
5

You're just saying that it's the natural order of things that women get to beat on men... I hate to break it to you, bub, but in real nature, the powerful have the right to do whatever the fuck they want--kill, eat, rape, torture, enslave. That's 'the natural order' of things in the wild. So...yeah. 'Nature' is the physically powerful taking whatever the hell they damned well please.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 06:53 PM
16

No, he's just saying that it's natural for men to be the recipient's of violence, and that it's therefore perfectly okay for women to beat on men. Oh, wait. Fuck yeah he is.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 06:50 PM
13

Holy fuck, this is some next-level crazy right here. 'Men deserve to get hurt. It's natural. They're built for it, so they have it coming'. Holy fucking shit.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 06:50 PM
31

It's against Title IX to in any way create an environment hostile to one gender or the other.
/r/MensRights21/10/16 06:46 PM
11

Too many people on reddit think hearing something they don't like gives them the right to attack people. This 'talk shit, get hit' philosophy that will land many of them in prison and probably get a few more of them killed.
/r/PussyPass20/10/16 02:58 PM
4

Agreed. she tried to attack him. He disabled her. He didn't start punching or kicking her on the ground. Don't start fights if you don't want to suffer pain .
/r/MensRights20/10/16 02:55 PM
1

A lot of people don't seem to grasp this, but in general, there are very few governments on this earth that consider a parent taking their child 'kidnapping' unless the courts are already involved (that is to say, unless there is some kind of custody plan to begin with).
/r/MensRights19/10/16 10:24 AM
2

That's it, isn't it? Civilization was built on our backs-- far more of our sweat, blood and tears than theirs. And that's fine. They made their own sacrificed and bore their own burdens. But they do not have the right to disrespect us and treat us like we are 'evil', or like they weren't standing behind us, cheering us on as we pacified and conquered the world. They weren't shedding tears of the genocide of the natives. They didn't shed tears over slavery. They were happy for those things, just …
/r/MensRights17/10/16 10:19 AM
2

I don't need to se the cirriculum at all. There is no acceptable way in my mind to teach boys about 'male privilege'. Save that shit for elective courses, not mandatory ones. It's like saying that there's an acceptable way to teach that the holocaust might not be real.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 10:14 AM
2

You have no facts. Every major 'fact' of the feminist movement--from 1-in-4 women being raped in their lifetime to domestic violence skyrocketing during the superbowl to men coming out ahead in diverse--every last bit of it is a lie, a twisting of the truth.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 10:12 AM
1

Stop pretending that there is any aspect of feminism that legitimately holds up to scientific scrutiny. There isn't. Your 'statistics' don't hold up to analysis. Your ideas, which you demand get treated as fact (while conveniently pretending aren't universally held by feminists whenever someone tries to criticize patriarchy or male privilege), have never been tested or rigorously studies, they just get wanked over by so-called intellectuals cherry-picking information from other people's studies.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 10:11 AM
4

'Misunderstood' in this context almost always means 'interpreted differently'. You choose to 'understand' these things in the most sympathetic light because they are part of your in-group. This is a well understand aspect of human psychology--you may have heard the famous quotes 'We judge ourselves by our intentions and our enemies by their actions'? That's what this means -- when people like us, or ourselves for that matter, do something, we interpret it in the best possible light. When people …
/r/MensRights17/10/16 10:06 AM
3

I am not standing on the rooftops or blasting on Twitter about killing men or calling all men rapists There are plenty of Nazis who never so much as murdered a single Jew. They still sat back and had beers with all of the Nazis who did.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 10:02 AM
2

In case you are just stupid, let's break it down. Him: you're pretending to be innocent in order to get away with your dishonesty. You: I do declare: whatever do you mean by that? I'm just too naive and innocent to understand the accusation being leveled at me. Him: Yeah, that's what I mean. You're pretending not to 'get' this so you can avoid the implications of the argument. You: I just have no idea what you're talking about. That's how he perceives this conversation having gone down.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 09:59 AM
1

It means that he believes that you're feigning ignorance and relying on the long-standing cultural assumption of female innocence to get away with lying to us. But we're not actually sexists. We know that dishonest women are every bit as scummy and untrustworthy as dishonest men.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 09:57 AM
3

Your ideology picked deliberately antagonizing buzzwords for its ideas entirely because most of you have issues with men and enjoy antagonizing us. We aren't stupid. You don't prattle on about 'male privilege' and 'mansplaining' because you're intellectually honest people. You chose those terms because you're all bigots who get off on injecting sexist, man-hating terms into the public discourse.
/r/MensRights17/10/16 09:54 AM
4

So you're just a feminazi troll, then?
/r/MensRights16/10/16 09:03 AM
3

I've said this before, people have to choose between taken seriously and using Breitbart I'm a liberal who refuses to listen to people unless they agree with me. There, I have changed your statement to more accurately reflect your feelings.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 09:03 AM
5

Actually men are being charged the normal price, and for a single day he is giving women a 7% discount. How is this a men's rights issue? There is no effective difference. Men are still being charged more than women -- that's how it's a men's rights issue. I automatically downvote the phrase 'How is this a men's rights issue?', because it's the surest sign of a troll. and if a few men go off in a huff it does not matter. most owners of a retail business don't think this way. A customer that goes…
/r/MensRights16/10/16 08:58 AM
2

Oh look, this sub's idiot libertarianism is rearing it's ugly head again. 'Don't trust to do anything guys! The magic hand of the market will swoop down and fix everything! The world will be coated in sugarpops and candycanes! Blowjobs will rain from the sky!' In the real world, bub, if you want to change things, you have to actually do something to cause that change.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 08:56 AM
2

There wouldn't be a news story if it didn't hit their wallets. The media is disgustingly biased about everything. I don't even bother reading the news anymore at this point. It's all lies anyway.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 08:54 AM
2

Her involvement with the CIA is indisputable at this point. It's even included in her wikipedia page.
/r/MensRights16/10/16 08:30 AM
2

Maybe, but feminists definitely lie when called out on their bad behavior, so I'm going to assume that's what actually happened here.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 09:42 AM
1

Who gives a shit how she sees it?
/r/MensRights13/10/16 09:41 AM
1

And you people always say, 'freedom of speech isn't freedom of consequence', don't you? Maybe this psycho-bitch shouldn't have tried to incite a mob against some poor disabled man. What the fuck is wrong with you that, given these circumstances, you have more sympathy with the man-hating psycho, than with the harmless disabled man?
/r/MensRights13/10/16 09:38 AM
1

I'm going to play devil's advocate I automatically ignore anything anyone says after that. If you're going to make an argument, make it. Don't try to evade all accountability for the things you're about to say (which you almost certainly do genuinely believe, despite claiming that you're just arguing for the sake of argument). Just fucking say it.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 09:36 AM
1

I'm a vampire. After all, I just said it, didn't I?
/r/MensRights13/10/16 09:35 AM
1

It's definitely illegal. But this sub cares more about shilling for libertarianism, than it does the legal rights of men and boys. So you're just going to get downvoted for pointing out the fact that it's illegal. Because a lot of people here think this kind of thing is awesome.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 05:12 AM
-2

But they're stating that they are adding to the price men pay, not 'discounting women', and they're calling it a tax, which they aren't authorized to levy. You have no idea what's legal. This isn't remotely legal.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 05:11 AM
0

No, it is not perfectly legal for a private entity to levy a tax.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 05:10 AM
0

No, they are not free to do so. This is against the law. Nobody but the government is allowed to levy taxes, and you're not allowed to charge people a surcharge based on their gender. This sub is so far up its ass in libertarianism that it's almost pointless to invest in it at all.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 05:09 AM
1

It's illegal for anyone other than the government to levy a tax.
/r/MensRights11/10/16 05:08 AM
2

ITT: Feminists from /r/all going 'nuh-uh!', or otherwise equivocating. If it should be about gender, why the fuck is it about gender in the first place, and why didn't you ever say that when the feminists first made this all gendered? 20k is an unbelievably large sample size. And unless you can prove that things have changed, you don't get to just assume that things have changed. Chances are, no one here on reddit is actually smart enough or has enough access to the information to 'debunk' a stu…
/r/MensRights10/10/16 08:57 AM
2

This kind of psychotic overreach by the federal government are why conservatives don't agree with liberals. Regardless of where it happened, something like this should NEVER be a federal issue.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 11:56 AM
3

Only if you're a man. And apparently it's a federal issue as well.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 11:55 AM
49

We're already seen a string of 'Sure, the Title IX is supposed to gender neutral, but I'm going to ignore it when men are the victim because I don't like the implications of it' rulings from liberal judges on the rape allegations. I have no doubt that the Democrats want to, not truly change the 14th ammendment, but simply ignore it and invent specious reasoning as to why it doesn't apply ever when men are gettin gored.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 11:54 AM
0

It's too easy to tell whether a baby was born alive or not for me to believe this.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 10:45 AM
3

Liberals used to be willing to take hard stands against popular sentiment to ensure that rights and liberties were respected. Now, liberals just sit around jerking themselves off over how great and noble they are, while clapping loudly whenever the rights of anyone outside of their pet groups are violated.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 11:02 AM
1

This is why I won't vote for female politicians. They only see themselves as women's leaders, not as everyone's leaders. Male leaders, when they aren't hopelessly corrupt, see themselves as everyone's leaders, not just men's.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 10:50 AM
5

Not a fan either, but whether or not a man gets strung up by a mob shouldn't be determined based on my feelings toward him.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 10:44 AM
-1

I won't believe someone who has already lied, /u/lodro, when you said that there was no aspect of 'Affirmative Consent' built into California law.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 10:37 AM
1

There is nothing remotely 'reasonable' about California law. It does have 'affirmative consent' built into some aspects of the law. So you're lying at the start of it. California mandates that all state schools use the 'affirmative consent' standard. You said that there is no 'affirmative consent' anywhere in it. You're a liar.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 10:36 AM
1

I would suggest that you look into the reliability of witness testimony before you decide that a drunk looking at something will give you an accurate description of that something. Sober eye-witnesses are often wrong about everything, and all available indications are that it is the least reliable form of evidence -- as bad as hair/fiber analysis, which is largely considered to be junk science by the scientific community. Eyewitness testimony is worthless. It just flat-out is. Human memory is to…
/r/MensRights04/10/16 10:34 AM
-1

Keep voting Democratic, and laws like this will sweep the entire fucking nation.
/r/MensRights04/10/16 10:31 AM
2

I have no difficulty believing it. But I want proof before I accept it. I believe all sorts of things, but I'm not dumb enough to consider any of those things facts without proof.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 11:52 AM
16

LOL, that idiotic first comment: 'There are real issues MRAs should focus on! Like this issue that affected my friend, which MRAs talk about and try to raise awareness on constantly. But I don't know that, because I've never talked to real MRAs, so I'll assume that they don't know anything about it!'
/r/MensRights23/09/16 11:15 AM
4

This sub is too serious sometimes...
/r/MensRights23/09/16 03:04 AM
34

How fucked do you have to be to say something like this and somehow think that universities are 'sexist' against women. This is why I will never vote for a 'progressive' candidate for anything. They clearly favor women and hate men. So no way in hell will I vote for that no matter how much I agree with the economically. They will only ever help women. If women had 90% of everything, their would call it 'sexist' that men refuse to give up the last 10%.
/r/MensRights21/09/16 11:33 AM
3

So, it's basically illegal to bathe a child.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 10:21 AM
11

If it helps, the author is a known fantasist (a reporter who makes up stories, sources, etc. in order to weave an entertaining or outrageous yarn). She has written several articles under that name, indicating that she hates her children for a variety of reasons, from her son's rape apologia to her daughter's autism. She claims to have seven kids, each of them with severe genetic or moral faults, and whom almost certainly don't exist.
/r/MensRights17/09/16 10:14 AM
3

Downvoted for lack of productive input.
/r/MensRights13/09/16 09:45 AM
1

Michigan rushes in where Texas fears to tread...
/r/MensRights13/09/16 09:44 AM
6

These researchers are full of shit. Look at any article about any study, here on reddit or on a newspaper site, and the first comments will always be someone trying to debunk the study, often badly, but sometimes with well reasoned arguments. When those articles are about theoretical drive systems or signals coming from a random star, nobody says a peep about attempted debunkings. But when people do the same thing to a pro-feminist study, suddenly it's 'misogyny'.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 12:09 PM
1

If he does nothing about CTR, this sub is dead.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 07:19 AM
2

If they don't, this sub will be as fucked as /r/politics. Dealing with the shills is more important than being 'fair'. 'fairness', repeatedly on reddit, has been used as an excuse to ignore wrong doing on the part of lefties. Meanwhile, the right is treated without a hint of fairness.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 07:19 AM
1

ITT: CTR. Mods can make all of the excuses they want, but if they let the sub go the way of /r/politics, that's entirely on them.
/r/MensRights10/09/16 07:17 AM
1

Man, feminists are brigading this part of the thread pretty hard.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 09:10 AM
-1

No, feminists really believe this garbage. They actually think that 1 out of 4 women have been raped, and that 1-in-6 have been raped or attempted raped. It's not remotely true. It can't be backed up by any legitimate evidence. It's a bullshit lie Mary Koss came up with years ago, and invented dubious survey-taking methods to 'prove' it. But they all still believe it. Your average feminists believes about 20 things that flat-out aren't true. They take these things as issues of faith.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 09:10 AM
1

Sure, if you use invented feminists statistics made up by Mary Koss. It's closer to 1 in 1200 than 1 in 6.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 09:08 AM
0

Tell me, what do you think the odds are any individual man will rape? Yet here you still are, defending this garbage.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 09:08 AM
6

Bullshit. If you didn't mean to say it, you wouldn't say it. This is one of those things feminists do. They come up with a hateful way to say something that deliberately inflames men-- 'Patriarchy', 'Manspreading', 'Mansplaining', 'Rape culture'-- and then, when men get predictably upset, they act like they never meant anything at all by it. But they keep labeling things as hatefully as possible. Over and over and over again. So no, I don't believe that it's anything but deliberate. If feminists…
/r/MensRights09/09/16 09:06 AM
1

I don't believe you. If a group of people, the majority of which have issues with men, start screaming 'TEACH MEN NOT TO RAPE!'. I'm going to assume that it's the issues with men that motivate them, and that any excuses they make is just an excuse. Because that's how people are.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 09:04 AM
1

If that's true, then why do colleges actually have courses that 'teach men not to rape'? Feminists lie, a lot. If called on an obvious injustice, they will lie about their motives to make those motives seem more pure. This is one of those times. But if they didn't think 'teach men not to rape' was a real thing, they wouldn't have mandatory orientation classes where they actually do it.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 09:02 AM
1

If that's your bar for action, /u/mashedpenguins, then there isn't a point in anything. No singular action you take will ever change the world. I guess you may as well just give up and do nothing.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 08:58 AM
1

The feminist hivemind here on reddit is not going to like this.
/r/MensRights09/09/16 08:57 AM
3

You aren't allowed to murder people just because you think they're bad. I guarantee you that under those rules, at least half of the people here would get murdered by someone they know. Because why the hell not? If you can just murder someone and then say, 'well, he was an asshole', then who is going to survive that test?
/r/MensRights05/09/16 09:13 AM
1

It's hard to trust Psychology as a so-called 'science' when their periodicals keep publishing garbage like this.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 09:06 AM
1

Maybe you should consider that blind people should be allowed to read signage and make some of these laws? I mean, being another country doesn't justify your being assholes.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 09:05 AM
1

The point is, you remove 'men's' bathrooms, and make them all 'gender neutral', was preserving women's bathrooms. And that's wrong. It's done entirely because feminists hate men. And that kind of thing makes us very fucking suspicious when universities put signs up like this. Because make no mistake, no small amount of feminists would love nothing more than to lock men out of everything. And labeling things as 'Gender neutral--but no men!' is a good way to lock men out of things while still pret…
/r/MensRights05/09/16 09:03 AM
1

There's probably another bathroom with a sign that says 'I think there should be, so there probably is' is not a valid argument. Prove that there is, or don't demand that the rest of us act as if there is.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 09:01 AM
3

One calls itself 'gender neutral', but isn't. And a lot of people here see a lot of 'gender neutral' things that somehow just happen to leave men out--'gender neutral' HAS to mean that men are included, too. We flat-out don't trust feminists not to play games with things like this, where 'gender neutral' morphs into 'everyone is allowed here, to do this activity or to gain this benefit, but not men'. That's the fucking issue, /u/mannerknife.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 08:59 AM
0

Then don't label it 'gender neutral', and then lock out an actual, real, scientific gender out, in favor of made-up pop-psychology genders.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 08:57 AM
3

Too clever by half, is how this kind of 'cleverness' is usually labelled. Show us a picture of the other door, if said door actually exists. I don't believe that it does, honestly. I'm sure that they have bathrooms men are allowed to use, but I'm also just as sure that there isn't a plaque like this next to it. Feminists--academic feminists included--just flat-out hate men. And they do shit like this because of it.
/r/MensRights05/09/16 08:56 AM
3

It's funny how in all other cases, liberals claim to be against these mandatory sentences. Feminism is a cancer that turns so-called leftists into foaming-at-the-mouth conservatives.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 10:04 AM
5

Why do I have to pay for my fuck ups, but women get to skate on all of theirs? This entire system is broken because humans chose to tamper with nature. Now everyone resents everyone else, because one gender was given the right to do whatever the fuck it wants, and men have remained practical slaves to what's best for a society that doesn't give the slightest shit about us. Fuck you and your 'society' nonsense. Society doesn't have good or even decent jobs anymore. It ruined marriage by making di…
/r/MensRights31/08/16 09:45 AM
3

Then poor women should have their children taken by the state and put up for adoption. And even the slightest accusation with CPS should cause a child to be removed from the home. You know, for the good of the child.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 09:42 AM
9

this is why I won't vote for liberal politicians no matter how much I agree with other things they believe. If you're a feminist, I will never trust your leadership on or about anything so long as these people are allowed to speak for you.
/r/MensRights31/08/16 09:34 AM
38

I find that people who say this usually mean 'he believes in holding women accountable the same as he'd hold a man'. Which to whiny little brats, probably seems like oppression. Not getting special treatment when you're used to it always feels like oppression.
/r/PussyPassDenied28/08/16 12:36 PM
8

Honestly, it's what I expected her to do. Make good press by claiming she's going to donate it, and then only donating some trivial portion of it, or setting it up so that either she or her friends get most of it by giving it to charities they created. I don't think you're pro-feminist. I think you're naive.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 12:21 PM
1

These people should state outright on their main page that conservative petitions won't be allowed, so the site can rightfully be judged for the biased piece of shit that it is.
/r/MensRights23/08/16 05:35 PM
1

Yes, but it's not professional. And professionalism really does matter in the real world. Professionals shouldn't be snide or snarky.
/r/MensRights20/08/16 05:55 AM
-4

Agreed. She'll say this. Then, in a few years, we'll discover that she only actually donated 500k or something like that.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 09:52 AM
-1

Fuck off. It was legally hers, the way banksters legally 'didn't break any laws'--only true because a corrupt justice system decided to ignore reality. So no, I don't actually have to buy into your bullshit. Nobody does.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 09:52 AM
3

Ah, the man-hating shithole that is the guardian.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 09:43 AM
0

This is a joke, right? WTF is wrong with you people?
/r/MensRights19/08/16 09:42 AM
1

And people keep saying that it's only teenagers on the internet who do these sorts of things... Fucking lying feminists. In other words, all feminists.
/r/MensRights19/08/16 09:41 AM
4

No. Because a woman who is drunk but still able to take an active role in sex does not meet the standard for rape in any single state in the union.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 04:09 PM
-2

Yeah... fucking unconscious people without express permission before hand is rape. Edit: It's pathetic that you downvoted this. That's literally rape under the law.
/r/MensRights18/08/16 04:08 PM
0

She said she did. It's best to remember that almost all of the stories and anecdotes comedians tell are made up to be humorous. I remember David Spade did a stand up about a decade or so back, and while telling a story he stopped halfway through to say 'Or whatever voice I used for that guy. It's hard to remember all of the stories that never happened and people who don't exist' or something along those lines. It was one of the most honest moments I've ever seen from a comedian. Then again, ther…
/r/MensRights18/08/16 04:07 PM
9

This is the creepiest aspect of feminists--the way they seek out moderator and other 'gatekeeper' positions purely to censor or belittle other people. Often in places that don't have anything at all to do with gender issues.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 12:40 PM
-1

This kind of dishonest conduct is the reason why /r/MensRights is viewed as nearly on par with /r/TheRedPill The only people who view it that way are man-hating feminists like you.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 10:00 AM
1

Every piece in the Guardian is an opinion piece at this point. Half of it is filled with lies. It's the Daily Mail for leftists, it's just that leftists refuse to acknowledge how downhill it's gotten over the last ten years.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 09:59 AM
2

Better to have them and not need them, bub.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 09:57 AM
0

The only reason no one can find a cite for this is because the feminists don't do it directly. They pressure liberals in government to put these policies in place, and then feminists deny that feminism had any part in it. They claim that it was all the government or the UN, and hey, YOU can't prove that the people advocating it were feminists unless you have them on videotape announcing themselves as such! These are pressure groups. They don't train directly. They just write the bills that say w…
/r/MensRights14/08/16 09:56 AM
1

The Guardian only lets people like her have a voice. It's undeniable that this is an editorial decision on the part of that once-proud paper, which is now just a feminist dishrag.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 09:49 AM
1

The Guardian only lets people like her have a voice. It's undeniable that this is an editorial decision on the part of that once-proud paper, which is now just a feminist dishrag.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 09:49 AM
1

The Guardian only lets people like her have a voice. It's undeniable that this is an editorial decision on the part of that once-proud paper, which is now just a feminist dishrag.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 09:49 AM
1

The Guardian only lets people like her have a voice. It's undeniable that this is an editorial decision on the part of that once-proud paper, which is now just a feminist dishrag.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 09:49 AM
1

Better 12 men with their own minds, than 1 man on the government payroll.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 09:48 AM
1

Better 12 men with their own minds, than 1 man on the government payroll.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 09:48 AM
2

No, juries are an important step in preventing government abuse. You don't get why juries exist. Due process is not enough. The government needs to make a case that normal people can understand, believe and agree with.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 09:47 AM
2

I think that she said it to get a laugh, and that she genuinely means it. The one doesn't exclude the other.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 09:42 AM
1

Thing is, you don't need to make an argument beyond 'She fucking said it'. YOU have to prove that not only did she say it to be humorous, but that she also didn't believe the underlying sentiment. You see, /u/Dauemannen, I'm willing to concede that she said what she said to get a laugh. But I'm also damned sure that she'd do it if she could. And that means it's not just a joke.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 09:41 AM
1

I don't believe that it's a 'joke-joke'. I believe that the 'joke' is that you feminists say shit like this, mean it, and then laugh at everyone when they believe your claim that it's just a joke. It's not that I don't believe that she didn't say it to be funny. It's that I don't believe that she didn't mean it. I'm sure Hitler joked about killing Jews all of the time. That doesn't mean he didn't intend to do it. And I have no doubt that if this psychotic bitch had even one tiny gram of power, t…
/r/MensRights14/08/16 09:39 AM
0

Her entire body of public work is proof that she hates men. So no, she doesn't get to say something like that, and then claim that it was just a joke later on. She showed us what she really is. I, for one, am choosing to believe what I'm seeing over her latter lies.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 09:37 AM
0

I don't believe her. I believe what she said the first time--that she wants to lock men in camps. She's a crazy, and you're making excuses for the psychotic crazy person because you hate men, too. That's how I see it.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 09:35 AM
1

Tit for tat, bitch.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 09:34 AM
1

I mean, it's not proof positive, but it's a strong indication. And it wasn't a joke. We keep bringing it up because we don't believe it was a joke. We believe that it represents her deep, heartfelt desire to punish and hurt men. That's it. You accept her bullshit lie. We do not.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 09:34 AM
2

I don't agree. Anyone who suggests this sort of thing has to be driven from the public sphere. Genocide is a step too far. I don't give a shit if you're a Jew or not. That gives you no special privileges. Hitler was 70 years ago. It may as well have been the dark ages to someone your age.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 09:33 AM
1

and so did I. Which just proves that you're an untrustworthy, man-hating sicko.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 09:30 AM
3

You don't honestly expect me to accept 'I was just kidding' from someone who wants to put me in a death camp, do you?
/r/MensRights14/08/16 09:30 AM
4

I don't think that's a valid point. Feminism is 80% against men, and maybe 20% about equality, but they still fight to the death arguing that feminism is a good thing.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 11:44 AM
2

When have feminists ever made sense? They don't rely on logic. They rely on brigades and admins who look the other way when a thousand people follow a link from an IRC chatroom.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 11:43 AM
2

Feminists think that if they gild something, it becomes true.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 11:43 AM
3

That wasn't your point, you lying cunt. Your point was 'OMG! HOW DARE YOU CRITICIZE LIBERALS HOW DARE YOU HOW FUCKING DARE YOU!'. Because you're a child lashing out at someone who said something you don't like, but which was entirely defensible. Almost all of this 'toxic masculinity' shit comes from the left. All of the real attacks on men come from the left. Sure, the right does some things that are bad for us, too--but they aren't doing it to punish us for being men. Only the left specifically…
/r/MensRights12/08/16 10:23 AM
1

That's how it works over there. They have a custom template that makes upvotes look like downvotes. Everything over there with downvotes is upvoted. Everyone over there with upvotes appears downvoted.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 10:20 AM
-1

No, I think I'd rather take the people who constantly plot to cut my balls off seriously. I mean, what the fuck is wrong with you /u/scemcee, that you think that kind of thing can just be ignored? Would you tell Jews to ignore a group of skinheads massing outside of their synagogue?
/r/MensRights12/08/16 10:19 AM
1

Fuck off, man-cunt.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 10:18 AM
6

They're a bit of both, honestly.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 10:16 AM
3

There appear to be a couple of truly insane types that have wandered in from /r/twoXChromosomes.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 10:15 AM
-5

This wouldn't be able to happen in the US. But Britain is some weird, dystopian shithole. Every former colony except for the US is as well. We clearly sent the Brits packing just in time to avoid Canada and Austrialia's fate.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 10:14 AM
19

Men can control our gaze, sure. But we don't have to. We have the right to turn our heads in any direction we'd like. We have the right to enjoy public spaces. If you don't want people looking at you, then stay in your house. Eyes literally cannot hurt you. They can make you uncomfortable--but that's a state that exists in your own head. It causes you no physical harm. It does not restrict, in any technical fashion, your ability to use public spaces. Catering to your insanity, would be like buil…
/r/MensRights12/08/16 10:12 AM
13

They can feel uncomfortable. But it's immoral to subvert the natural born rights of men just to make women feel comfortable. You don't have a right to be comfortable. You can't restrict other people's access to public sites to make yourself comfortable. I'm not sure why you crazy-as-fuck people think that women deserve special rights, and that men's freedom should be restricted to give women special rights.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 10:10 AM
25

No, women can wear whatever the fuck they want. But they don't have a right to tell other people that we aren't allowed to look at them. Women are not sinful things that need to cover every inch of themselves. But nor are they majestic, royal things who deserve to have us evil male peasants avert our eyes from their godly figures. How retarded does a human being have to get before they start to think like you?
/r/MensRights12/08/16 10:08 AM
17

People have a right to look wherever their eyes can see, tard. Don't be a cunt and people won't think you are.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 10:07 AM
16

Britain, trying to make 'stare rape' a real thing. It really is like some kind of dystopian novel over there.
/r/MensRights12/08/16 10:06 AM
5

Men's lives don't matter to the media elite. They'll prioritize murderous women over dead men.
/r/MensRights07/08/16 11:05 AM
1

I hate to break this to you, but feminism is widely despised throughout society, too, but you guys seem to think you still have the right to sperg out every time someone says something you don't like.
/r/MensRights06/08/16 10:01 AM
3

A lot of people at the top here are just SRS brigaders and whiny feminists who hate men. This tends to happen whenever this sub hits /r/all. The SRS types go apeshit and flood the sub for a few days, downvoting everything and upvoting themselves to the top. How else do you think the top comment has 1400 upvotes, while the next tope comment only has 300?
/r/MensRights06/08/16 09:58 AM
1

ITT: a massive SRS brigade.
/r/MensRights06/08/16 09:55 AM
9

Victorian prudery dressed up a fancy new wrapper. These people are, deep down, everything they pretend to rail against. An anti-sex elite that want to punish people for being animals by nature.
/r/MensRights05/08/16 03:09 PM
10

And like most cop, you're a corrupt cunt who thinks that shit like this is defensible.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 12:16 PM
43

Disagree with the feminist narrative, and the elite will take your job away.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 04:52 PM
3

Feminists will not be happy until criticizing their movement is a criminal offense.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 01:52 PM
2

Holy fuck, are these whackjobs really surprised that people have a right to face their accuser?
/r/MensRights31/07/16 01:51 PM
1

Liberal government is the enemy of men. I don't like it. I'd love a liberal, economically liberal party to vote for. But as long as identity issues rule supreme, fuck the liberals who hate white working class guys like me. If they and their pet classes don't have my back, I don't have theirs. Fuck the gays and minorities so long as they hate me. If they want to amend their ways and make common cause, fine. But so long as these freaks hate me and mine, fuck them and their's.
/r/MensRights31/07/16 12:02 AM
1

lol, this took me too long to get.
/r/MensRights30/07/16 01:02 AM
-1

Fuck off you piece of shit.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 11:19 AM
1

Hollywood doesn't plan sequels around it's accounting. It doesn't even stand by its accounting. IF you sue them over it, they cave so fast it would make a lawyer's head spin. It only works at all because most people in a position to sue over it need the studios for further work.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 04:27 PM
3

I mean, I'm sure it's ironic, but I'm not going to take someone with the word 'shill' in their name very seriously when they defend a candidate known for hiring actual shills.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 04:23 PM
1

It's more or less inevitable that Facebook will have common carrier status forced on it, probably under the next Republican president. I don't think Twitter survives long enough.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 01:58 PM
1

It's essential enough at this point. Fucking brigaders. Edit: and judging by your history, a bought account.
/r/MensRights24/07/16 01:56 PM
5

Wow, that is a shit ton of bias on the part of that judge. Holy fuck. I'd argue that he had this judgment written before the case was heard.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 04:55 PM
0

Social media has made me really, really hate liberals. My entire life, they've talked like they believe that everyone deserves a voice, that the powerful shouldn't be allowed to silence people. And then they get the power and start banning anyone who disagrees with them from everything.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 08:34 AM
3

It's happened both ways at this point. They started out as college Republican protests, but then feminists saw them and were like, 'wow, that's actually a really good idea'. Poe's law, writ large.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 08:29 AM
-2

Please. I doubt you get your panties twisted up every time some asshole liberal says something mean about conservatives or Republicans, and that's a lot more common here on Reddit than the other way around.
/r/MensRights21/07/16 08:20 AM
1

I have no faith in a DOJ investigation into this run by Democrats.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 01:00 PM
1

LOL, that sub is full of leftists who think brownshirt behavior is something to emulate.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 12:57 PM
1

Liberal judges have been using odd logic to dismiss the equal protection clause since feminism became a thing.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 09:22 AM
1

Of course it does. but as we've seen recently, liberal judges will just bend over backwards to find some nonsense rationalization as to why Tital IX shouldn't be enforced in a gender-neutral fashion.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 09:21 AM
3

While true, you have to admit that if there are enough gender-specific reasons for women to vote for Hillary on gender alone, there are almost certainly enough reasons for men to vote against her on gender alone. Either gender matters or it doesn't. I'm sick of hacks and liberals claiming that it only matters for women, but should never matter for mens.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 09:18 AM
1

It's simply impossible to have free speech or any kind of democracy as a practical matter if you don't designate large portions of the internet as a 'public common's. I am sick and tired of people like you, who are very clearly idiots who want to force a 16th century conception of 'public commons' on a modern world where most political discussion happens over th internet. By your logic, ATT should be allowed to censor phone calls of people whose politics they disagree with. Because it's a privat…
/r/MensRights11/07/16 08:48 AM
1

Honestly, rampant libertarian nonsense is killing the MRM. It's impossible to have a valid rights movement when 20-30% of your members doesn't really believe that the government should secure individual rights, and is instead only interested in maintaining corporations' 'rights' to discriminate against people.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 08:46 AM
2

It should be dismissed with prejudice, tbh. Otherwise the government will just keep trying until it proves itself right.
/r/MensRights11/07/16 08:45 AM
54

This is a massive abuse of the 'sticky comment' system. It really shouldn't be used to force your personal opinion to the top. That's actually pretty disgusting.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 07:49 AM
1

RBG hates men. Everyone knows that. It's in pretty much every decision she makes regarding men's rights v. women's rights. Women always count 'extra' to her.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 07:54 AM
1

So, if someone's job involved bashing toddlers brains in with a hammer, you'd consider them to have no moral culpability for the act?
/r/MensRights29/06/16 07:53 AM
1

At this point, Democrat judges are just throwing out any suit opposing feminism, almost always for extremely specious reasons.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 07:43 AM
6

Good riddance to bad rubbish.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 11:01 AM
43

Stop her from what, making an ass out of herself without managing to make the world even slightly better for anyone but rich white girls?
/r/MensRights26/06/16 10:09 AM
1

A lot of brilliant men were drunks. Throughout much of history, everyone was a drunk. Do you have any idea how much alcohol the US consumed before prohibition?
/r/MensRights25/06/16 06:44 PM
1

The person who fired them is going to be fired for admitting why he fired them.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 06:42 PM
1

Thing is, it's illegal to fire employees for discussing their wages with each other. It's a form of wage suppression.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 06:41 PM
1

I'd suggest you just learn to change a tire. I mean, it's changing a fucking tire. Unless you've got a rust problem, it's really easy. And it's really important. Even if you're a woman, learn how to change a god damned tire.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 06:40 PM
1

Guy on top is letting a good thing pass him by. He's got a decent face. He has the makings of a decent body if he put the work in. I think he's making a mistake. Second guy down, at his age, he's earned it. Bottom guy... I don't know. He should get in shape, too, but most of the guys around his age I've seen with broader shoulders and thicker body types are a lot fatter than he is. So it's hard to judge him. I'm a shallow son of a bitch, what can I say.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 06:35 PM
1

I think Bond is our Shaft.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 06:31 PM
1

And it didn't make much money. But do watch it if you've seen the series, because while it doesn't wrap everything up, it really is a fitting 'end'.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 06:30 PM
2

Being flat chested is not 'a genuine medical issue'.
/r/MensRights23/06/16 10:11 AM
1

I see no proof that this is satire whatsoever. And I doubt you'd dismiss a source just for being liberal.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 11:02 AM
1

Terms aren't necessarily legal, particularly at a state school.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 10:58 AM
10

Feminist mods won't let anyone post it there.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 11:58 AM
8

Feminist mods, same reason shit like this always gets deleted. Feminists put themselves in positions of power wherever they can, and then suddenly you can't even make a comment on a forum about car repair without some whacko feminist deleting it.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 11:57 AM
3

A child cannot willingly consent. you've got your head up your ass as far as that judge did.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 11:56 AM
2

OMG, you are a horrible fucking person. This is not about one fifteen year old having sex with another 15 year old. This is about a scummy adult taking advantage of a child. What the fuck is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights19/06/16 11:55 AM
2

So, then Brock Turner only deserved 6 months, right? After all, that's what the court held. Fuck off, you hypocritical shitbag.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 11:54 AM
4

Bullshit. You people defend the indefensible, and then wonder why most people despise feminists. This is feminism -- making men pay for women's crimes.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 11:54 AM
2

Then we should ban abortion. A child shouldn't be punished because its mother is irresponsible and hates it. It still deserves to have a future.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 11:48 AM
-7

The communist party was never 'banned' in the US...
/r/MensRights19/06/16 11:47 AM
1

I mean, they used to be prestigious, and I guess they have a cool job. But most of them are people who couldn't get better paying jobs in the private sector, or people who are just setting themselves up to get one of those better jobs.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 12:18 PM
1

That's an easy thing to say.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 09:31 PM
2

In all fairness, most of these people are young, and any attempt to invest energy in an already failing relationship is more likely to fail than succeed. They are likely just judging by their own experiences.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 09:29 PM
1

Why do you think she's the only one who matters here? I don't give a shit about her baggage. Her choices, her baggage. I deserve the right to know so that I can make my own choices. I don't want to stay in a relationship with a woman who aborted my kids, and I damned well have the right to that. I have a right not to be forced to remain in a relationship with a fucking liar who withholds information she knows I'd need.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 02:43 PM
0

I don't give a fuck if it's her call or not -- it's still his call as to whether or not he wants to stick around afterward. He has a right to know that she did it because of that alone.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 02:42 PM
0

No, it isn't. I'm not sure if you people are stupid or are just being deliberately obtuse. I would want to know, because I would leave a relationship with a woman who was aborting our children together. This other man deserves the right to make his decisions regarding this relationship with all of the knowledge he needs to do so -- and whether or not she'll keep aborting your children together is damned sure something he'll need to know. You all know this. You all know that he might leave her ov…
/r/MensRights14/06/16 02:41 PM
0

It's very simple: He needs to make a decision as to whether or not he wants to stay with a woman who has in the past, and likely will continue in the future, to abort any resulting offspring. I don't know how you think this is something he shouldn't know. It could be a deciding factor in the continuation of the relationship.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 02:39 PM
2

Because 'this woman will abort any child we would have together' is important information for a man in a relationship to have going forward. I would leave the person who did this.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 02:38 PM
2

Because in this scenario, you would never know.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 02:37 PM
1

Because it will matter to the relationship. He may want to end the relationship with a woman who terminates children, either because he wants children, or because he is morally opposed to it. Ethically, one person in a relationship should disclose any serious information that may cause the other party to question that relationship: drug use, medical disorders in the family, a history of personal mental illness, etc.. Given how intrinsic having children is to romantic relationships, it seems like…
/r/MensRights14/06/16 02:36 PM
16

'My body, my choice!' is something feminists only believe applies to women.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 02:32 PM
4

I don't think 'It's easier to just be a bad person' is a valid argument. This just makes women sound like monsters, the way too many feminists seem to.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 02:31 PM
-1

Please, you people are fucking transparent with this bullshit. If slavery was abolished, why can women force men to quite jobs they love and get 'better' jobs entirely so they can send those women more money? This is why I hate feminism. You never apply to your own actions, the logic you demand be applied to everyone else's.
/r/MensRights14/06/16 02:30 PM
0

Who knows. The thing is, we know that Heard is being misleading, the pictures of her only-sometimes-there bruises are proof of that. So I'm leaning toward her being the bigger liar. But you can't know. That's why we have investigations and trials. If the police don't act, then they found no evidence. If they do, then we wait to hear the evidence.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 09:31 PM
1

You're on a social justice subreddit We make fun of them as Social Justice Warriors, precisely because they are not that. There is nothing wrong with a just society, assuming that society can function (more important that good and evil, or ideological values, is that everything actually has to work, otherwise the other debates are just academic). But these people do not want a just society. They want an authoritarian regime with their boot on our necks.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 09:27 PM
3

Not really... it's an accusation. I mean, you wouldn't call a man you simply dislike a pedophile. So unless you think she is whorish, and she may be -- I don't think it matters much, honestly, what matters is the accusation of domestic violence -- you just shouldn't use that word. Don't call someone an idiot unless they do something stupid. Don't call someone a rapist unless they have raped someone. Don't call someone a whore unless they have explicitly in some way exchanged money for sex. It's …
/r/MensRights06/06/16 09:25 PM
3

Or this hits a sour note with him. We don't know his history. And let's be honest, there are a lot of people on this sub trying to 'prove' that they aren't misogynists by cracking down on anyone who disagrees with their sex-positive viewpoint. I agree that the word was improper here. We don't know that she's even a gold-digger. Depp is a very desirable man, and something people act badly when relationships end -- the motive for asking for money is likely as not just to hurt her former lover in t…
/r/MensRights06/06/16 09:22 PM
-2

Whores lie for a living. Do you think they use their real names? Do you think they're using their real personalities? Grow the fuck up. Whorishness is a bad thing -- it promotes antagonism between women, and between women and men. I don't want it outlawed (it's possible to believe that a behavior is both wrong and should not be punished, at least when you reach a certain age). But it's definitely not good overall for trust between the genders.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 09:18 PM
5

It's not that she isn't kind of a whore, it's that you don't put words like that in the title of articles. It's unseemly. I would say the same thing if the word was 'dick', or 'bastard' or 'asshole' or 'cunt' or even something less aggressive. It just isn't proper. In the comments it's fine. In the titles isn't. IMO, anyway. Won't pretend to humble.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 09:15 PM
2

She has no case. It's a publicity stunt. American protections over speech -- particularly when it comes to famous people -- are too strong.
/r/MensRights06/06/16 09:13 PM
1

I don't want to dispel these feelings.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 03:32 PM
2

Homo Superior is just a term Magneto made up.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 03:25 PM
1

If this man killed everyone involved, I'd be more than happy to look the other way.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 03:16 PM
2

But that wasn't your example. Your example was of two people, both of whom had put the time in. And 'putting the time in' doesn't matter. Value matters. If you've got a sociology prof. who regularly brings in grants, has great evaluations and higher enrollment, then the Sociology prof. deserves to make more money than the guy who studied Quantum Physics. That's how the world works. Nobody gives a shit what kind of time you put in unless it gets results.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 02:07 PM
2

Shouldn't it depend on which of them brings more income to the school, rather than their field? This looks close to declaring that people who study physics should simply be paid more regardless of actual the actual value brought to the table.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 02:05 PM
2

Legally, it's still in the public, though. so, no, it isn't.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 09:54 AM
2

Setting your facebook page to 'private' does not grant you any increased legal protection whatsoever. You're still saying something in front of a thousand other people. There can be no expectation of privacy there.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 09:53 AM
1

Liberal is, as Liberal does. It's amazing how many people here will 'no true Scotsman' if their own general belief system is questioned.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 09:41 AM
3

This isn't remotely that. This is feminazi Canada deciding that women don't deserve to be arrested for statutory rape.
/r/MensRights03/06/16 09:31 AM
2

Reddit is about 40% female, and of those women, about 90% of them seem to be radical feminists. The women here on reddit don't act anything like the women I've met in real life.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/16 10:08 AM
1

She can say whatever, it's still going to be used as evidence, and juries don't convict when they see stuff like this, so prosecutors don't keep pushing unless they are radfems.
/r/PussyPassDenied02/06/16 10:07 AM
1

On the one hand, he has a right to his own comfort zone. On the other, if my body looked like his, I wouldn't even wear clothes. I'd just move to a nudist colony so that my neighbors could see the glory hard work and God had given me.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 10:00 PM
1

They probably believe that literal dragons exist somewhere in the world as well. You joke, but those of us who make a hobby of reading the iffier parts of the internet know that these people exist. They're rare, and even crazies often think them crazy. But hang out on AboveTopSecret or the like and you'll run into them eventually.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 09:58 PM
3

It's not status, it's that they're a frame of reference we all get. If someone asks me who the ideal woman is, I can't say 'Amy D. in college', now can I? But I can say Blake Lively, and people will get the drift when it comes to my basic 'type'.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 09:56 PM
12

Eh, who knows what you'll look like at fifty. Hell, I'm 34, and judging by my friends I'm just shocked that I still have all of my hair, that it's still the same natural color, that I don't have wrinkles yet, and that I'm not 200 lbs.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 09:54 PM
5

I won't register as a Democrat after Obama sold that party to the bankers. So I couldn't vote in their primaries. The Republicans are simply more welcoming to Independent voters.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 09:51 PM
36

I agree. I don't like Trump, but he's better for my interests than Clinton would be. That shouldn't be true. I'm pretty down on my luck right now. But it is, what it is. Trump opposes free trade, Trump opposes a government that, in New York at least, feels one step below a police state. Trump doesn't hate men, and I'm pretty sure that HRC does.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 09:50 PM
24

They were lied to, same as us, about what makes the world work. We were all lied to by elders who were out to steal our futures to make their own presents a little more comfortable. Don't let them point the finger at someone else. Remember who is to blame here: The older, wealthy elite, not some clueless little girls. They want us fighting each other, when we should be fighting them. They shipped the jobs overseas. They rewrote the laws to enrich themselves and impoverish us. They are our enemie…
/r/MensRights31/05/16 09:44 PM
8

Why do you keep drinking with assholes?
/r/MensRights31/05/16 09:40 PM
-53

Please, we never think that way about our first loves. Even the ones who deserve it.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 09:39 PM
-60

Honestly, you're all as bad as the feminists. You repeatedly come up with decent ideas, or at least defensible ideas, and then couch them in terms designed more to piss other people off, than to convince them.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 09:38 PM
5

Men and women should both be very angry at the politicians and the establishment who gutted the American middle class and made forming families all but impossible. Stop training our fire on each other, start training it on them. Not us, Them.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 09:36 PM
0

The reason most people hate lawyers, is that most lawyers are complete and utter cunts. It's not so much the profession, it's the kind of person who seeks that profession -- and what that kind of person does with the power they gain from it -- that makes people hate lawyers. If the job weren't filled with obnoxious cunts who deserved a bullet to the head, people wouldn't keep making jokes about killing them all.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 11:30 AM
1

Redditors are largely children who have very little life experience. They don't really 'get' the problems of this country, and what little they do get, they lay entirely at the feet of the Republican party, despite the Democrats having been in power for 16 of the last 24 years.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 12:36 PM
1

The US army have said no such thing, and if they did, that would be a massive scandal for the ARMY, because refusing to obey the commander in chief is something you can be executed for. Edit: it is truly disgusting the way liberal redditors are obviously praying for a military coup that would destroy democracy and plunge the world into chaos, over the notion that a candidate they don't like might win an election. Seriously, what the fuck is wrong with you?
/r/MensRights30/05/16 12:34 PM
3

Do you actually believe any of this? 1.) you are right, it is small potatoes. The lack of jobs, the hollowing out of wages and the lack of opportunity are the big reason that all of this is happening. 2.) people have been talking about 'building a wall' for decades, it's not a new or 'Trump' thing. The only reason it's really resonating now is the shit economy and the lack of jobs, because before that not many Americans were interested in fighting illegals for shit jobs. But when all the jobs ar…
/r/MensRights30/05/16 12:32 PM
2

Pc has a lot less to do with this than the fact that the country never really recovered from the Great Recession. The economy did, but most towns didn't, most families didn't, most people didn't. The government -- a government run and controlled by the Democratic party, and totally so for the two most vital years -- didn't do a god-damned thing to help Americans, they just bailed out the bankers and their rich campaign donors. THAT is a damned good excuse for making Trump the Republican nominee.…
/r/MensRights30/05/16 12:28 PM
3

Hillary, like a lot of Democrats, panders to liberal feminists and thinks that it's the same thing as pandering to women.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 12:24 PM
5

Not only. It's a part of it, but it wouldn't nearly be enough. There's a large feeling that the establishment has not only failed, but that it's evil and corrupt. This is the first time in my life that a major party candidate for President has held the majority position on 'free' trade, for instance. The system isn't working. People make a lot less money than their parents did in terms of spending power. Older people are watching their children unable to buy homes or start families, and they are…
/r/MensRights30/05/16 12:22 PM
3

That's just not true. I've seen women change their mind about men due to circumstance and experience. I've seen men 'grow' on women the same I've experience women 'growing' on me.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 12:18 PM
1

No, mental illness is very real. And only a crazy person dismisses evidence as 'irrelevant'. Seriously, on behalf of everyone who has ever been hurt by these psychopaths, fuck you and your new-agey bullshit. Everyone with BPD should be rounded up and shot in the head.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 12:16 PM
6

There is nothing closer to evil in this world than someone with BPD. They will ruin your entire life and convince themselves (and possibly, other people) that they were doing you a favor by doing it.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 12:14 PM
1

This is too close to victim blaming for my tastes.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 07:40 AM
1

You worry too much what your enemies will say about you.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 07:39 AM
2

Yes, because colleges don't have 'legacy' enrollments or anything... You don't know what the fuck you're talking about. Too many people are too pissed at the lack of opportunity in this country to just let your bullshit slide.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 07:37 AM
1

He's just wrong on how 'hard' it is to be a lawyer. Most kids who graduate with law degrees don't even get jobs as lawyers, because of how many lawyers law schools are overproducing. This has been an issue for over a decade now, so I don't believe that he's simply unaware of this.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 07:36 AM
2

And you willfully ignore the vast corruption problem in our criminal justice system and how many judges just outright suck at their jobs because they are primarily political appointees, and not lawyers who were good at their jobs. You're the kind of lawyer who flips his shit at completely valid criticisms, and then almost certainly brigades anyone who disagrees (hard not to notice that everyone responding to you has a controversial dagger next to their comments, and that's a huge red flag).
/r/MensRights29/05/16 07:34 AM
1

That's just a lie. Law schools are known for being easy to get into, and for graduates not being able to get actual lawyer jobs once they graduate due to how many law students there are. You are just full of shit on this one.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 07:33 AM
1

Judges in this country are too corrupt and have too little accountability, and that's just a fact. It's disgusting that freaks like you felt the need to downvote someone else for not giving due deference to a bunch of black-robed psychos who don't give a shit about anything but their own little court fiefdoms.
/r/MensRights29/05/16 07:32 AM
1

Outside of a few very small tribal societies, no, there just plain isn't.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 12:00 PM
1

There is no evidence. It's just feminists talking out of their ass.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 11:59 AM
1

The Atlantic is a perfect example of everything that's wrong with the Democratic party today, a union of upperclass twits and rabid feminists who want to ignore 90% of the country's problems and focus entirely on 'women's rights' and expanding 'free' trade.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 11:57 AM
1

True. But 90% of feminism is looking at things that suck for everyone, and then coming up with an argument as to why it's women who are the only and real victims of such a thing.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 11:39 AM
1

Too many people play video games and read comic books to comfortably make these statements. I mean, chances are every football player you know owns an XBox.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 11:38 AM
1

I'm man enough to make my own decisions.
/r/MensRights28/05/16 11:30 AM
1

Feminist mods hate men. ITT: The idiot libertarianism that neuters the men's movement.
/r/MensRights24/05/16 07:50 AM
1

Oh look, one of the brigaders decided to actually post here. Reported to the admins.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 12:32 PM
-1

The assumption of good faith (but only if your politics are good) is the problem with Wikipedia. They assume good faith even after it's been proven otherwise. I don't give a shit about what you think should be done. It is innacurate. You people -- you 'guys' or whatever -- think that your little circle jerk is more important than accuracy. It is not. Your site is scum. You people are scum. You hate men, and you enshrine this bigotry in your articles -- and when people complain with a less than p…
/r/MensRights21/05/16 12:29 PM
2

They may be male, but their feminists first and foremost. And feminists are all 'liars for Jesus'. They don't care about truth if a lie will advance their cause better.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 12:27 PM
4

Define 'shitty'. If by 'shitty', you mean 'about to fall down', then it's in the public good to tear them down even if it does piss someone else off. comity is not important than truth.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 12:26 PM
1

This isn't really true. It can be good for non-controversial things. Or it can not, if one of their editors gets a bug up his or her ass about something and decided to camp its page. Remember that the worst Wiki editor ever -- Ryulong -- used to camp anime pages that should have been complete non controversial and would enforce mistranslations that they preferred over the objections of plenty of people who knew better. It doesn't have to be controversial at all. They are so clickish over there t…
/r/MensRights21/05/16 12:25 PM
1

I'd say 'It's a conservative paper', but the liberals don't plan on doing anything about wages, either.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 10:11 AM
2

Please, it's been decades since hard work was actually rewarded in this country.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 10:11 AM
1

I always assumed that this was intentional, an attempt at reducing population rates. It just didn't really pan out.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 10:08 AM
2

Nobody even knows for sure what these were. They weren't of 'Venus', though, and that feminists felt the need to flub that much makes me question them. 'Venus' is not a synonym for 'female'. Venus was a goddess, represented by a planet and a symbol, that was closely associated with femininity. Just as Mars was a god, represented by a planet and a symbol, that was closely associated with masculinity. But 'Venus' still refers to that specific god. This are not 'Venus' figurines. They are pregnant …
/r/MensRights21/05/16 10:07 AM
1

Given how important hunting was to our ancestors, I really kind of doubt it.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 10:04 AM
4

They literally won't let you. They will just put it back in place, and their circle-jerk radfem community will back each other up and allow the feminists to write whatever whacked out nonsense they want. This has been an ongoing problem with wikipedia -- it gives feminists too many special privileges. Hell, feminists are allowed to make articles 'important' to themselves, forbidding anyone else from altering them.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 09:56 AM
2

Honestly, it seems worthless to bother. Don't try fixing it. They won't let you fix it. Just stand outside and lob bombs at it until it falls apart.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 09:55 AM
5

None of it belonged there. IT was all useless conjecture by psychotic feminists about how angry and bitter men are that we can't get pregnant. Shit like this is why nobody trusts wikipedia.
/r/MensRights21/05/16 09:54 AM
1

It's allowed. It's not 'okay' to have an opinion like this without evidence, though. Having half the country guessing that everyone else is a pedo is going to be massively harmful to this country, to the rights of its citizens and to the quality of life.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 11:26 AM
1

I don't think he actually had much involvement with their lives as children at all. He 'helped raise' them in the sense that he gave their mother money, not in the sense that he acted like a father to them in any other way.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 11:23 AM
1

There is no evidence of this whatsoever. You deciding to believe someone is not 'evidence'.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 11:22 AM
0

90% of all complaintants are likely telling the truth as they know it. Some will finger the wrong guy or misstate events because trauma makes it very hard to get your head straight. Some will simply be wrong (that is to say, the events do not actually constitute rape; this is a lot more common than most people think, because a lot of women really are taught this 'rape is in the eye of the beholder' concept that if they feel sketchy about what happened, then it's rape). And a lot will more or les…
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:57 AM
3

Fucking psychopath who never had the respect of men, and seeks to make up for that through the approval of women.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:54 AM
6

The left has become its worst caricatures of the religious right.
/r/MensRights14/05/16 11:53 AM
4

Man enough, yes. Dumb enough, no.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 11:29 AM
1

There is no way a California judge would have upheld this prenup if a man had been in the cat-bird seat here. You know, I know it, everyone knows it. So why lie?
/r/MensRights11/05/16 11:33 AM
23

Everyone who spends more than five minutes there hates them. They're a sham org that pretends to speak to men, while really just saying the things feminists want men to hear.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 11:44 AM
3

Mark my words: Hillary will see herself as a 'womens' President. She will not give a damn about anyone else.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 01:11 PM
5

Joe Biden is weak. Make no mistake about that, he is weak. He has never felt like a Man in his life. And he thinks that by doing things like this, he can make himself feel strong -- or that he can at least make other people feel that he is a 'man'. Men like this, who play entirely to other women, they don't deserve respect. They are the male equivalent of the girl who only has male friends, and constantly shits all over other women because she knows that those women will see through her bullshit…
/r/MensRights29/04/16 02:26 PM
1

I'm not shocked. IT was fairly obvious that the judge had decided to ignore the actual law in favor of an outcome he decided. So they'll reword it a little, put in the bit about considering each gender equal, and when it gets rejected, have a stronger appeal. They originally expected to win on the merits. Now they clearly expect this judge to act ideologically, and are preparing a case that will make for a stronger appeal. I would like to point out that for all the liberal caterwauling about Bus…
/r/MensRights27/04/16 08:33 AM
1

The 'shut up because women attempt more' It isn't generally accepted as being true outside of feminist circles, either. The more you look into feminism, the more you realize that every single one of the statistics that they regularly cite is just full of shit.
/r/MensRights23/04/16 12:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter