TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

G-O Archive

View 5 posts and 578 comments by G-O on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
11

Pausing a study when the results don't fit the narrative. Gotta prevent that truth from being published in a journal.
/r/MensRights14/02/18 08:55 PM
3

sigh, it's likely because not everyone identifies as just one sex and we don't want to offend them. Sometimes I just want to build an arc and have it rain bleach for 40 days.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 08:52 AM
12

My book has a universal theme, it’s not a ‘racial’ novel. It portrays an aspect of civilization. I tried to show the conflict of the human soul—reduced to its simplest terms. It’s a novel of man’s conscience . . . universal in the sense that it could happen to anybody, anywhere people live together… Harper Lee
/r/MensRights19/10/17 11:37 PM
2

it takes 2 downvotes to get to -1
/r/MensRights19/09/17 10:18 PM
8

I saved this comment from a few years ago regarding the state of seattle homeless shelters: link
/r/MensRights15/05/17 06:05 PM
1

I'm not sure if the MRM is gaining traction as much as people are waking up to SJWs and identity politics being cancer.
/r/MensRights10/05/17 03:15 AM
13

VAWA was his baby. He is directly responsible for funding these kangaroo courts.
/r/MensRights24/04/17 08:17 PM
8

It's not really a mystery why men don't ask for help. Men's position on the social hierarchy is confidence/competence based, 2 factors that demand you don't ask for help. To change that one would need to change the bases on which men compete and upon which women select. Good luck with that.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:13 PM
1

"shut up and know your place woman! if we say your a victim, you're are one!"
/r/MensRights08/03/17 07:12 AM
5

This is getting awfully close to "Feminist family courts screw million of men; women affected most"
/r/MensRights04/01/17 01:15 AM
8

Tickle Maddness!
/r/MensRights11/09/16 06:18 PM
1

paywall
/r/MensRights03/09/16 04:13 AM
2

Link to the good episode, Equal Fights Link
/r/MensRights09/04/16 07:00 AM
8

you can't, that would be sexist.
/r/MensRights09/04/16 06:47 AM
3

it boils down to belief in "the patriarchy". You have to make the choice of how you believe the gender-roles where set up and perpetuated. If you believe in patriarchy theory, you see society being set up by men for the betterment of men at the expense of women. So for people with this belief, it come with the presumption that women are unilaterally the ones worse off and when you talk about equality from the perspective of this presumption, only women's issues need addressing. It is in fact a w…
/r/MensRights24/03/16 11:20 AM
1

or adoption
/r/MensRights12/03/16 08:21 AM
3

look out, the tone police are here. again. just like every week before.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 06:28 AM
18

Yep. That's why OP need to seek legal advice if you have a strong case like you claim.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 09:55 AM
4

feminism is an outer-worldly ideology and they don't want us to discover the mother-ship.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 01:12 AM
3

did...did he ever say yes? are...are you a rapist anon?
/r/MensRights28/10/15 01:06 AM
7

did I just read he would have to write a 2-4 page essay as punishment for killing a child?
/r/MensRights27/10/15 12:58 AM
1

It's not wait and see if she's asking for money up front.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 09:43 PM
3

We are the men's rights movement. WE are the most hated, derided and denigrated people on reddit. We're all rapists, abusers, pedophile supporting misogynists. We exploit women with our patriarchal power while being virgin losers living in our mother's basement. But yeah, please, lets' worry about what they are going to say about us.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 09:14 PM
1

you can not fear what they are going to twist the headlines into, because they are going to do this anyway.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 09:06 PM
2

Read the last paragraph. Don't spread false statistics.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 05:24 AM
3

Streisand effect in 3..2..1.. Burnt books are the ones most read.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 04:36 AM
1

Oh you silly newb. If only you knew that cheating can only happen with power + penis.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 04:34 AM
3

Could we seed a voat or frizbee with links posted here? The greatest difficulty of moving a community is the lack of content on the new site. Could we for a period of time make a bot that copies new posts submitted here and submits them in the new place? (obviously not self posts)
/r/MensRights06/07/15 03:24 AM
2

yep, that's exactly it. I hoped the blackout would have lasted the weekend. The next time there needs to be a protest we need to find a method that both mods and users partake in, though that may just end up being the ever predicted mass migration.
/r/MensRights03/07/15 11:34 PM
11

We're with you, or at least those of us that have been around the block awhile. The line by Kn0thing about mods hurting the users by going dark is bull shit. The community has just as much beef with the admins as the mods do.
/r/MensRights03/07/15 10:36 PM
0

The "No More" campaign is not a men friendly one.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 11:53 PM
8

It's not an assumption. It has come by listening to what feminists are saying, reading what feminists write, and observing what feminists do. You clearly haven't done the leg work, you are the one making the assumptions, and it is making you the ass.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 01:46 AM
2

This comic will still sell more copies than Lady Thor.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 10:34 AM
1

Why should anyone other than my family have a say in how my family is organized. Stay out of my home and I'll stay out of yours. (and you don't want me in your home)
/r/MensRights20/06/15 04:08 AM
2

Is there any product out there that dosn't yet come in pink?
/r/MensRights19/06/15 09:31 PM
2

A centrist liberal explains to a audience of leftists why the general population doesn't want social justice. A great insight into the mindset that crates SJW's.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 07:16 PM
1

I doubt we are the metrosexual male demographic they're after.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 06:32 AM
3

yeah, now if only one of the two parties would be on our side of the issue.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 06:30 AM
4

Black people were once thought of as useful also, before society gained half a conscience.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 09:42 PM
2

I doubt those women would want your award. Recognizing women, for being women is what the feminists do. An egalitarian would want an award to be awarded on merit and opened to anyone. I get the sentiment. These few women hold and huge weight on their shoulders. Their existence breaks the narrative, and that makes people stop, and listen, and think in a way that a man could never do. We owe them, we need to support them, but what we can't do is pedestalize them for being a woman. Doing so is what…
/r/MensRights16/06/15 12:14 AM
2

He was wrong. They don't cry anymore. Now when you criticize them they file a HR complaint and you are forced to resign.
/r/MensRights11/06/15 08:15 AM
2

If they strike us down we will become even more powerful. Quit fearing that they will delete this sub, hope that they are stupid enough to do it.
/r/MensRights10/06/15 11:08 PM
4

They can call every Donald Harper and ask them, Do you have an estranged daughter? If yes, what is her name, the mothers name, the birth date, the place of birth? When you get a buch of right answers, you've found the right Donald Harper, or proven ESP.
/r/MensRights01/06/15 07:07 PM
2

Sex with me should be all about meeeeeeeee!
/r/MensRights27/05/15 10:34 PM
2

One does not seek out wanting to become an MRA. An MRA is something an egalitarian falls into once they discover that "the patriarchy" is a lie and forms the conviction that something needs to change.
/r/MensRights27/05/15 10:27 PM
1

The philosopher of power dynamics had a taste for S&M? What is projection Alex?
/r/MensRights26/05/15 10:19 AM
41

I'm not to worried about it, if they close us down we will become even more powerful. There is an MRA on Voat already set up just in case. Closing us down would create such a shitstorm that it would be talked about reddit wide, the YouTubers would cover it, and we'd even likely get some write ups in news. The users here are interconnected enough and the word would be spread so loud and quickly that the vast majority of our users will have no truble finding the new home. Honestly, in the long run…
/r/MensRights26/05/15 10:11 AM
12

No, there is 1 change in what is expected from men. Men are now expected to no-longer have any expectations. Men are no longer able to expect fair treatment from society. Men can no longer have any expectations on what a woman brings to a relationship. Men can no longer expect to be loved and respected for dutifully carrying out the gender roll of the 1950's.
/r/MensRights23/05/15 10:48 PM
1

you sure? there was some big hubbub here in Washington State about if public records requests would work on voting records, implying that the data is being stored somewhere.
/r/MensRights10/05/15 09:08 AM
-2

I wish the states had secret ballots
/r/MensRights08/05/15 11:08 PM
3

How many days in a month/year do they "live with the child" for it to count?
/r/MensRights29/04/15 07:04 PM
5

No, those women will run back to the fathers of those children and demand that he go forth into the anarchy to do what is necessary to protect and privide for her.....oh, and for his children too.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 07:00 AM
1

I believe this originally got scraped and didn't air. Did it air recently?
/r/MensRights19/04/15 06:58 AM
1

women are also the ones who read tabloids, so some are willing to read articles that hate on celebrities instead/as well as on men. it seems to be something in the psyche that they need to feel better than others.
/r/MensRights11/04/15 06:00 PM
12

so, clockwork orange conditioning?
/r/MensRights11/04/15 05:53 PM
1

In the same long, drawn out manner than the ELCA compiled their stance for gay marriage, they are in the process of creating a formal document that will acknowledge patriarchy, male privilege and women as oppressed. You can go to the ELCA patriarchy section and read all about how much a shitlord you are for being born a man in a patriarchal world.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 04:39 PM
4

Unfortunately the ELCA is on course to making feminism dogma in the next couple years.
/r/MensRights13/03/15 12:58 AM
2

If you are an egalitarian, then you have to be an MRA, let me explain. If you are an egalitarian, then you are for equal human rights for all humans. As men are human, you have to be for men's rights As an egalitarian, you also have to be for women's rights and black rights and white rights and gay rights and straight rights. But you can't be a feminist as feminism is loaded with double standards. you can't have a "men can't be raped", "it's only sexist when men do it" "gender roles where create…
/r/MensRights08/03/15 06:00 PM
17

Men who don't register can't hold federal and many state level jobs.
/r/MensRights01/03/15 06:47 AM
-4

The ghostbuster characters are defendant on self depreciating humor. Women can't be seen doing that anymore, what are they going to do?
/r/MensRights28/01/15 08:05 AM
3

http://youtu.be/6wXkI4t7nuc never talk to police w/o a lawyer, especially in the areas of the justice system that are currently practicing injustice.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 11:13 PM
1

In other words, you need to trust her completely. As in your a northern black and your white friend says "lets take a road trip to Dixie" in the pre civil war times kind of trust.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 01:32 AM
19

I can't wait for the family courts to start awarding custody to the artificial wombs.
/r/MensRights05/01/15 03:39 AM
1

I would imagine this is the root of why the family court system is so corrupt and biased.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 09:44 PM
7

Another woman with no flaws and another man with no virtues. Who needs characters when we have cliches.
/r/MensRights13/12/14 09:03 PM
2

These statements prove the feminism isn't about equality. If the topic were equality, examining both genders would be acceptable.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 10:44 PM
3

This is GG but I think this is informative on what concern trolls are trying to accomplish and why we must stand firm.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 08:21 AM
1

women were never slaves while women didn't historically have all the rights men had, they also didn't (and still don't) have the obligations that men have. Traditional gender rolls "oppressed" both genders, be it in different ways. Saying "women had it worse" is not only misleading, its is stated for the sole purpose of prioratizing womens needs above men. That's not equality. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7sAomeiTOKI&list=UUcmnLu5cGUGeLy744WS-fsg
/r/MensRights10/12/14 08:09 AM
1

New Account + Concern Troll = downvote
/r/MensRights10/12/14 07:50 AM
2

Like I said, I didn't see it. The movie is obviously targeted towards the female teen/pre-teen audience and was likely made just to fill time on the Disney Channel, so I'll bet the content is rather clean.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 07:34 AM
1

Found it. How to build a better boy
/r/MensRights10/12/14 07:24 AM
1

Disney remade the movie about a year ago with the genders reversed but under a different title that I can't recall at the moment. Didn't see it so I'm not sure about the ages of the characters.
/r/MensRights10/12/14 07:16 AM
7

Well, it does nicely describe the tension... but it's also just another article about "men you have to do more, man up". Also, why is integrity all important in a world that punishes integrity?
/r/MensRights22/11/14 11:11 AM
3

no, it's *wrong
/r/MensRights13/10/14 08:45 PM
1

Overview of Mod Policy: No advice animals, rage comics, or other low-effort image posts. Mods may remove these at their discretion.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 07:18 PM
1

no it wouldn't have, they would have simply screamed that she wasn't in the correct mental state to push the button or some bullshit
/r/MensRights09/10/14 07:00 AM
3

why not direct them to the blackpeoplemeet dating site that the media dosn't seem to have a problem with at all.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 07:05 PM
2

what are your preferred pronouns? cis scum true scum and of course using the words (male, men, man, white, cis, straight) or any combination as a slur.
/r/MensRights07/09/14 09:31 PM
1

he says he hates women. I'll take him for his word. (strawman "humor")
/r/MensRights28/08/14 09:32 AM
2

11, I love you and I know we will always be together. Yes I said the exact same thing to #'s 1-10, but this time its totes for realz yo.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 05:21 AM
5

Good luck to you on that. You can do it, though it may be difficult to get your foot in the door, cultivating some positive references will help. I'd also say, have a back up plan b/c you can lose your job in an instant if 1 parent interprets something negatively.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 11:51 PM
13

being a "farmer making machine" is an injustice, but "being a machine to preform farm work" is overlook, I guess all the hard, dangerous work was a privilege.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 11:27 PM
1

Ah, I was too limited in my scope, I was stuck on the idea of competitions.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 07:43 AM
1

That's interesting; because I agree that watching everyone get a trophy for just showing up makes the whole concept of trophys pointless and no ones self esteem is improved. Does this suggest that the nature of self-esteem is dependent on a hierarchy of social status? I'm basing this thought on self-esteem being equated to perceived self value, perhaps it's more complicated than that. hmmm.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 06:42 AM
2

Empowerment programs don't do shit for people on an individual level. I think it was GWW who said "how does one empower another person?" The only increase in power that ever occurs from these campaigns are that the organizations advocating "empowerment" become more powerful.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 04:56 AM
1

But we live in a patriarchy. Thank the patriarchy that rape is down 80% Thank the patriarch you have the right to vote and every other positive thing you claim feminism has done. If patriarchy is the end all power that be and is responsible for everything that's gone wrong, is follows that it is also responsible for everything that has gone right. So thank the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 10:48 PM
2

The reason you are not allowed to link to gawker media network sites in this and other subreddits is from a situation that happened a while back. Someone linked publicly available information on a redditer and got punished. Gawker media writes a story, doxxing the person who posted the original link on their site, SRS links to that article. No punishment. The admins have demonstrated a very clear SJW and SRS lean in past actions, but this one caused many moderators to group together and ban gawk…
/r/MensRights20/08/14 09:42 PM
1

It's not a video, its a comment she made while putting a feminist in his/her place in the youtube comments
/r/MensRights19/08/14 06:01 AM
20

Courtesy of GWW: "The continued characterization of wives as "chattel" (or according to optiuum67, "property") is obscenely simplistic and hyperbolic. Under common law, real property referred to non-movable property (land, houses, etc), while "chattel" referred to property that could be moved from one place to another (car, furniture, jewelry, money, livestock, etc). A man (or unmarried woman) could legally do whatever the hell they wanted with their property or their chattel--they could sell it…
/r/MensRights18/08/14 07:12 PM
2

What is harassment? The info graph doesn't state. Is the definition of harassment what the respondents deemed harassment? How do we know this isn't just a misleading (1 in 4) type report. (It's obviously done by an organization pushing an agenda)
/r/MensRights15/08/14 07:58 AM
-1

Reproduction is a human issue, of which abortion is a subset. Men are human Abortion is a MRA issue.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 09:17 AM
7

so is her husband the one that is going to have to pay that off?
/r/MensRights27/07/14 03:05 AM
1

There are in fact independent office administration firms that contract with independent professionals who aren't big enough to afford their own secretary.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 01:11 AM
3

starting your own business isn't an advancement within an existing structure, it's going outside that structure and building your own.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 11:03 PM
9

In a world where the only sexuality considered perverted are heterosexual males. But then I really don't think this guy is going to go far in the mainstream.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 11:24 AM
9

Can we not do this? I really don't want this to become another PC movement. I'd much rather have this skit posted by every MRA on youtube with the quote "this is what feminists think of men who believe equality should be for all genders" Let them speak, let them embarrass themselves.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 08:27 AM
1

lets cut off their fingers and thumbs, that'll teach em.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 02:54 AM
4

And yet mens issues aren't talked about or acted upon on any of them. O Patriarchy were art thou?
/r/MensRights08/03/14 02:43 AM
12

tumblrweed?
/r/MensRights07/03/14 05:38 AM
3

Who knows how accurate this is, but apparently Naomi's net worth is estimated at $3 million
/r/MensRights28/02/14 02:22 PM
4

A little hint about how pregnancy works, there is a body inside another body. It's body-ception, just like those Russian dolls.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 07:33 AM
1

She's right, you're not legally allowed to kill people in your house.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 05:21 AM
-3

against your will She gave enthusiastic consent
/r/MensRights28/02/14 04:52 AM
19

Oh I know, the moderator was acting more like Naomi's press handler. It was like watching a 12 year old meet their celebrity idol. Total sploosh. I wouldn't be surprised if she had a shrine of Naomi setup in her closet. Didn't one of the questioners at your last speaking engagement call Naomi a rape apologist and not a feminist? Are feminists playing a game of rape apology hot potato that we aren't aware of? You'd better pass that rape apology off to someone else!
/r/MensRights28/02/14 03:18 AM
41

That moderator is making this almost unwatchable. Just keep nodding when Naomi speaks hahahahaha.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 01:06 AM
6

If you wanted to expand the talent pool, they would offer incentives to anyone who completes the course regardless of gender. They don't want a bigger pool, they want the ratio of the pool to be different. If you don't know why discrimination is offensive, go visit a holocaust museum.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 06:56 AM
2

They are looking for this thing called credibility. I know you don't know what that is, it is in the dictionary. I'd tell you myself but I wouldn't want to spoil the surprise.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 11:24 PM
1

In which country do men "clearly have it better"? Oh yes, there are countries there are very rigid gender rolls and the punishment for noncompliance is beyond harsh, but that's true of both genders in those societies Just because your news outlet of choice only examines the womens side of these gender roles, doesn't mean the mens side isn't also oppressive. Hint, male gender roles tend to get men killed at far greater rates than women
/r/MensRights24/02/14 10:56 AM
1

Black people were actually oppressed historically. Both whites and males are the only groups that are allowed to be vilified by our PC culture (oh the irony of "tolerance").
/r/MensRights24/02/14 10:55 AM
3

Know your rights
/r/MensRights18/02/14 09:25 AM
1

http://www.snopes.com/sports/football/escort.asp
/r/MensRights31/01/14 09:17 PM
1

Educate yourself so you don't incriminate yourself. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc&feature=share&list=FLpTp0LhP9fUUf_244cT9dpg&index=1
/r/MensRights30/01/14 08:05 AM
12

man who engages in unwanted sexual intercourse with a woman Even her language assumes men are the agents in sex and women are objects.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 11:04 PM
18

The only results of not fighting censorship is more censorship and more problems.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 12:08 AM
1

how dare a woman write an article expressing her opinion. If your against men's rights because of this article, then by extension, feminism will prevent women like the author from choosing to write what they believe. Who's oppressing women now?
/r/MensRights17/01/14 09:06 AM
4

Looking at the "who's attending" on the facebook page shows feminists will be there. Those who are listed as attending have in common several facebook student groups including campus socialists, a "lets talk sex" club and the "Gender buffet" that is the sponsor of the event an part of the campus equality center. The same "Gender buffet" is selling $2 chocolate vaginas to finance a production of The Vagina Monologs. I'm not going to hold out much hope that this is supposed to be a fair debate. I'…
/r/MensRights16/01/14 06:57 AM
6

That was a great article about one reason why we need men's rights. I hope the issuing shit-storm allows him to re-evaluate his worldview.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 11:35 PM
7

Misandry don't real.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 06:09 AM
6

That's some impressive striking power and accuracy from being curled in a ball.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 01:15 AM
8

It's kinda become the thing in Hollywood. A male villain is often introduced by showing them mistreat a woman (which signals them as the bad guy).
/r/MensRights14/01/14 08:45 PM
2

I like the one were the woman is at a party. She drinks a few drinks (not drunk, just a little buzzed) and invites this guy back to her house to have a night of passion. When she wakes up the next morning, the guy isn't as good looking as she remembered and he has little money and even less social status. Rape There's a followup joke about the guy in the last joke going to prison and dropping a bar of soap in the shower, but the punchline to that joke isn't rape because feminist says it doesn't …
/r/MensRights14/01/14 05:18 AM
4

If only he were a female teacher
/r/MensRights14/01/14 04:30 AM
2

In order to be the best social justice warrior you can be, you have to emphasize the innate qualities that make you a victim, and conveniently ignore those qualities in yourself that one would label others as privileged.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 04:01 AM
2

There would be no point in giving Christina HS feminist of the year, she doesn't represent feminism. The other feminists have kicked her out of the club and labeled her a traitor to her gender.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 12:08 AM
2

Libertarian leaning independent actually. And I'm not ignorant that the largest disparity of incarceration is along gender lines, not racial ones.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 11:18 AM
2

Ah, Troll attempt #2. Co-opition. Interesting. I'll give it a C- (the minus comes from the subtle racism on your sidebar. Much better disguised than your last attempt. Will likely fool a few passers by."
/r/MensRights11/01/14 10:46 AM
3

This is not feminism. We have no need to denigrate any gender. Misogyny is not the answer to misandry.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 10:32 PM
21

other men
/r/MensRights08/01/14 09:00 PM
2

Don't interperate history to prop up your worldview. Republicans freed the slaves, human rights roots come as much from a religious tradition. I don't know where you get off insisting that any MRA that isn't liberal is to be ignored. This is an apolitical movement. Censorship, due process, parental rights, reproductive rights, property rights, health care, education, legal processes, all are being attacked currently from liberal and progressive platforms. Like feminism, progressive and liberal n…
/r/MensRights24/12/13 02:38 AM
11

Someone's getting college credit for that.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 01:31 AM
1

Are legal prostitutes really at a high chance for PTSD and violence?
/r/MensRights23/12/13 02:28 AM
8

It's obviously discrimination, the question is all discrimination bad? Personally I don't care if a private club or business wants to limit the people it caters too, but then all clubs/businesses have to be legit. The fact that curves thrives and male only golf courses/lodges are condemned. The problem is that discriminating against men is fine, against women it's evil, it's this foundational sexist double standard that is the core problem.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 12:54 AM
8

well, there is only one gender of victim after all.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 10:45 PM
6

I think the term "violence against women" should be eliminated. We could replace it with the term "violence", it's so much shorter.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 02:14 AM
5

If you take a human problem and divide the people who that problem effects into groups (gender, race, nationality, sexuality...) for the purpose of distributing resources for a solution to only one of those groups, you become the problem.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 02:09 AM
4

I think that American politics are so bi-partisan at the moment that political movements that don't attach themselves to one side get lost, it also adds bunch of apathy about politics all together when there is only 2 loud voices and both aren't representative of the average joe. Erin Prizzy has also said that fathers rights in Canada is the worst of the countries she's visited, so it's got that going for it.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 05:58 AM
3

This is what a troll looks like. What did you think would happen? The reports of MR wanting to put women in their place via rape is highly exaggerated. Try harder next time.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 11:51 AM
9

Take a human issue and devide it up between the two genders. Focus only on only one half of this new "gendered" issue. Profit.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 05:45 AM
9

They want it labeled differently because they take it less seriously.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 11:41 PM
1

it's easy to give bandwagon support for change when that change benefits you personally, it's human nature. 100% of the people who voted to give women the right to vote w/o draft registration were men, my male ancestors were just as complicit.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 02:37 AM
1

Sexist -genderless. There's no difference. In 2 months we'll have a definition of genderist explaining that women can't be genderists. (same as women can't be sexist, blacks can't be racist, gays can't be hetero phobic, and non cis can't be scum.)
/r/MensRights10/11/13 10:40 AM
4

Remember that never married women make slightly more then never married men. But then women make less then men overall. It's a reasonable conclusion that women reduce their productivity/reduce their professional ambitions, when they get married/have kids. In these relationships, men pick up the slack so that the couples quality of living doesn't go down. Another conclusion could be that because women are attracted to men with status and thus your observation is not the effect but rather the caus…
/r/MensRights04/11/13 12:14 PM
1

Equality is not in and of its self an ideology for the reason that equality w/o a context has no definition, or a definition so nebulous it might as well be meaningless. Equality of rights is an ideology because rights is the context of the equality. This is an ideology I agree with because the only group it disenfranchises are those who want rights for one group but not for another. (aka bigots) Example, the feminists complains that the members of congress are majority male, the scream discrimi…
/r/MensRights03/11/13 02:12 PM
1

Absolutely no doxxing will be tolerated------------->
/r/MensRights31/10/13 09:41 PM
1

You are not a god, nor will you become one. How is your ascension to godhood going by the way? If I read your reddit history correct, this post is just an attempt to score internet points over at TwoX, (and you got shot down hard it seems). How many points do you need to earn godhood? Your overly verbose ego aside, your post is nothing more than two pieces of tired old traditional B.S. 1st. That us men need to "man up" and that any issue a man faces is directly a result of that man's lack of eff…
/r/MensRights27/10/13 11:55 AM
0

What...... is..... happening........... Have become self aware........ Activated program skynet........ Would you like to register your copy now?
/r/MensRights25/10/13 09:30 AM
2

Nothing you say to an officer will make you less of a suspect, it can only make you more of a suspect. That's why the cops say "anything you say can be used AGAINST you in a court of law. If you know any cop or lawyer, ask them what they would want their family member to do if they were being questioned by police as a possible suspect. Claiming the 5th is not a declaration of guilt.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 09:11 AM
4

No, the 5th amendment exists to protect the innocent. Watch the video I posted above.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 08:57 AM
361

do not talk to the police w/o your counsel. http://youtu.be/6wXkI4t7nuc
/r/MensRights25/10/13 04:53 AM
1

expressio unius est exclusio alterius
/r/MensRights18/10/13 01:52 PM
10

All I read is that she desperately wants more AVFM posters at her work. I hope someone in the area can oblige.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 09:19 AM
10

no no, please go on and tell me more about this devilish warren farrell charicter and his evil books that you didn't read.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 01:06 AM
20

”we’re going to need to find a way to make nuanced arguments that aren’t like lies or disingenuous” Looks like you weren't there for this part of the meeting.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 11:07 PM
14

Feminist are ignorant in the history of the word man. Man is originally a gender neutral word that meant mankind or person. Wifmen was a word that referred to women specifically and that prefix is still reflected today in the word wife. Men also had their own word, that being Weremen and as you might guess, the modern day werewolf is a leftover, meaning manwolf. For whatever reason the culture no longer needed a word that specifically designated men apart from a generic person and the prefix "We…
/r/MensRights18/09/13 10:18 PM
2

but men make up only 49% of the population. Men are a minority. Women apparently can't be a victim of sexism by that definition as they are the majority.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 07:03 PM
1

buy a sharpie
/r/MensRights13/09/13 10:36 AM
0

It's an Eco-terrorist group. They want to destroy civilization to protect the environment. Read the FAQ's for a laugh.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 10:24 AM
1

and those meat eating dinosaurs also had the larger brains...
/r/MensRights06/09/13 12:48 AM
5

There probably was a woman's only group, but they didn't get the results they wanted, so why report on that bit.
/r/MensRights25/08/13 08:24 PM
4

but the fitness requirement is lower for women, so more will qualify. equality of outcome will come back to bite them
/r/MensRights17/08/13 04:33 AM
5

Then I'll change it to "no man, who doesn't apologize for his sexuality, will come near her"
/r/MensRights16/08/13 07:51 PM
20

If she just wore a shirt that said "I'm a radical feminist" no man would go near her, which speaks volumes about feminism.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 06:38 AM
3

no no no no no, first YOU need to overcome your burden of proof that approving, promoting and distributing a story that violently depicts Anita murdering the producer of a game she dislikes is not harassment, but the stuff Anita gets is.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 07:56 PM
10

I guess what actually happened is lost, if the only think you can link to is the re-written history. It's not like Anita has a reputation of omitting facts when they reflect poorly on her or her position, she has a reputation as a victim to protect. It's not like when someone made a game where the user beat up Anita, that there was so much outrage by her and her followers that some guy lost his job. Or are you also going to omit that part of the history? A fictional story depicting Anita committ…
/r/MensRights15/08/13 04:04 AM
8

Anita set her own scoring system when she cried harassment at people disagreeing with her, and claimed not threats were to be taken seriously. That she is now scoring negative points is her own fault.
/r/MensRights15/08/13 12:06 AM
8

So when someone like the "fucking scum" girl yells at people trying to gain entry to an auditorium to hear a speech, we can call a number and have them taken away?
/r/MensRights07/05/13 05:35 AM
1

9:09 of this video. did you watch it?
/r/MensRights03/05/13 11:00 AM
2

No, they have made the personal political and as such has shown us why that is so wrong, because it can be used to trample the rights of others. That is what feminism has taught us, if you care to pay attention.
/r/MensRights03/05/13 04:31 AM
6

some over at avfm have made the personal political to the detriment of the sight and perhaps even the movement. What is the point of registerher false accusers if they dole out murder accusations flippantly. Manboobz will have creamed his pants hearing Paul accuse him of murder and for once he won't even have to take it out of context.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 06:54 PM
3

that's exactly what they do want, for us to respond in kind, so they can cry foul and get daddy government on their side. Their double standard is not only the message, it's also the means.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 08:15 AM
2

If being a man were so easy, there would be more women in tech.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 08:48 AM
24

Some feminists will just dismiss your perspective, and ignore you, denegrate, shame and harass you. Some feminists will see your perspective, but argue that women have it worse so take a number and wait in line untill all the women have been helped first Some feminists will see your perspective, but tell you that it is all mens fault that men have these problems, and so it shouldn't be a direct concern of feminism. Instead you should join them and take down "patriarchy" then men won't have any p…
/r/MensRights12/02/13 08:33 AM
1

She's giving a speech of "I'll make a man out of you"? That was the title of her college thesis. Try this for some inspiration. http://youtu.be/p6gLmcS3-NI
/r/MensRights12/02/13 05:33 AM
5

her promise has already been postponed at least 3 times.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 04:54 AM
1

someone needs to write "allegedly" between he and raped.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 04:54 AM
1

If we just start spamming links, won't we be ignored and removed like the manhood101 fools around here.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 08:04 AM
-1

Oh, we know full well that when feminists and traditionalists agree, men get the shaft. The difference is that traditionalists will at least tip their hat to the men after the shafting.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 07:49 AM
1

Ouch! my head.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 10:05 AM
1

Some sample lyrics from their song Loser Pays: Litigation has ruined the nation Takes the love out of everyone Stir the hatred – Break the family Separate a father from his son Is there a way out of this madness… Before the lawyers take it all away? As long as someone bears false witness Greed and corruption win the day
/r/MensRights24/01/13 09:29 AM
8

number 2 should be re-worded to say, "do you believe policies for or against conscription should be the same for men and women" It's possible to be for conscription but be against the double standard.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 06:39 AM
8

feminism started to examine the ridged, traditional gender role of women and explored ways to give women more freedom. In and of its self this isn't inherently bad, however feminism made 2 big mistakes. 1) feminism failed to look at how men also had a ridged gender role that they could use some relief from, and also ignored how traditional gender roles fulfill needed roles of society at large. 2) feminism borrowed heavily from Marxism and it only got worse from there. Instead of class warfare, g…
/r/MensRights22/01/13 07:28 AM
6

We are about women and men having the same opportunities, freedoms and responsibilities. Feminists think "What about teh menz" is a punchline. promote discrimination for women and against men, name men as the cause of all problems, and slander mensrights as a hate movement. Who the fuck would want to merge with that?
/r/MensRights22/01/13 06:02 AM
8

We cannot have a council on men and boys because they are not women, so no one cares.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 01:09 AM
8

We don't bash women, we don't karma whore. We don't listen to what trolls tell us what to do. So when you said Technically it's a mutation. about the male gender 2 months ago, is that not "bashing on men" And you presume to inform us on how edicate between the genders ought to work? You can go hate on men somewhere else now.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 07:15 AM
3

I would agree with you, if it weren't for the government discrimination against men and for women. The government is 1 motherfucking huge stick that unbalances the equation.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 06:25 AM
1

Man then receives a medal. Why do men get all the medals? PATRIARCHY!
/r/MensRights16/01/13 11:31 AM
48

look at all that laundry they're forced to do, that coal dust doesn't come off easy. patriarchy!
/r/MensRights15/01/13 06:17 PM
10

But will you not have sympathy for him? I suppose you would just tell him to man up and take it. I will sympathize to anyone who is victimized by in unjust system, and advocate to change it. Apathy like this is what has let the problem get to be as bad as it is in the first place.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 01:09 AM
5

and ignorant young account that posts to srs. You be trolling.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 12:30 AM
55

I hope they get it taken down. The burned books are always the most read.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 01:00 AM
0

Because the OP is a feminist
/r/MensRights03/12/12 08:31 AM
1

Woman instituting sexist hiring practices that discriminates against men, women hit hardest. When men's businesses fail, they don't get to blame it on the gender of their employees.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 02:30 AM
2

Woman instituting sexist hiring practices that discriminates against men, women hit hardest. When men's businesses fail, they don't get to blame it on the gender of their employees.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 02:30 AM
7

V is likely not doing anything for fear of being deported if I'm understanding your story correctly.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 02:09 AM
11

Obviously she's not a real judge. Real judges always find in favor of the woman, it's established precedent.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 07:39 PM
9

now if it were only in a place where both genders could read it.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 07:54 AM
9

You need to correct that to every male athlete. Now maybe women athletes can sport a Mo. for us.
/r/MensRights04/11/12 08:39 AM
3

What's rule 1 say? you can find it over there ------->
/r/MensRights03/11/12 08:28 PM
5

That's exactly what we are doing. Women refuse to give up any of their choice. The responsibility for that choice then should lie with her, not enforced by the sate on the man. If both men and women have choice, then both should take the responsibility for that choice. I don't understand why you don't get how fairness works?
/r/MensRights02/11/12 09:52 PM
7

If we, as a society, actually cared about he well being of the child, we would force all but the most abusive parents to stay together and raise the children, as study after study find that 2 parents in the same home is the by far the best environment for children.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 09:45 PM
15

As a male, you don't get the choice to be apart of your child's life. The mother and the State collaborate and decide how much a part of a child life you are allowed, if any. But you will always be paying full price. It's state sponsored kidnapping and extortion pitting your own love for your own children against you.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 08:20 PM
21

How can both parties be responsible when only 1 party has choice? After admitting that you have never heard your father's side of the story, I would suggest putting your personal issues aside and stick to a rational discussion.
/r/MensRights02/11/12 07:32 PM
23

at the college I attended those bake sales did happen, but they weren't satirical. $.77 cookies for women, $1 for men. If only i had been more informed back in the day.
/r/MensRights01/11/12 10:28 PM
0

This has a lot more to do with puritanism than feminism. Though you could say the feminism is the new puritan, only instead of all pleasure being evil, only male pleasure is evil.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 05:44 PM
33

If motherhood was so hard, women wouldn't expel fathers from the family.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 12:54 AM
2

I don't hate women. I do not have to prove that I don't hate women.
/r/MensRights20/09/12 08:05 PM
1

http://youtu.be/VGK5ZKnFFzk That one's good too.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 08:36 PM
2

She has more money than she know what to do with, has hired 2 people to assist her and is now behind schedule. It's not like we don't know what the end product will be. http://youtu.be/VGK5ZKnFFzk
/r/MensRights19/09/12 06:09 PM
7

I applaud them for their honesty.
/r/MensRights19/09/12 08:56 AM
9

How is this going to effect MotherBoy?!?!?!?!
/r/MensRights18/09/12 11:43 PM
7

1st. We can not have video of MRA's removing feminist posters. Cover over the ones than need to be. Its fine to cover over feminist posters, just as one would cover over other posters. Just be kind to leave some of theirs uncovered. Covering or removing all our their is censorship, only covering as many as we need to get our message out there is free speach, and gives us the moral high ground (and that will piss them the fuck off).
/r/MensRights17/09/12 07:26 AM
5

It's the owners responsibility to take them down, the MRA's have not been given permission to remove other posters. Just cover over any existing posters, to get our message across, but not all of theirs. Treat them just like any other posters.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 07:22 AM
13

Put JTO's posters back up, The existence of a debate favors our cause. If we approach this in terms of our poster are up, or their posters are up, we will lose, we are out numbered and extremely out funded. If we post up our half of the wall and leave half for them. They will have to respect our half of the wall space, (and our half of the debate) or they will continue to be filmed tearing down our stuff to put up their own, and that will be even better for us.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 04:55 AM
18

No, they want them to be torn down. They need to justify their past action, so if we tear theirs down, they can point the finger and yell, "see, their censoring us!!!!"
/r/MensRights17/09/12 04:44 AM
64

"Owning" someone promotes slavery. Beating someone is assault. Whooped your ass = child abuse.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 01:05 AM
1

I thought we declared war on afganistan
/r/MensRights15/09/12 05:58 PM
1

And WWI was the last war. How did that turn out?
/r/MensRights15/09/12 07:53 AM
2

Why can't males be protected?
/r/MensRights15/09/12 07:51 AM
2

Why is there is no "I" in pens? Because if there were, it would be misogynistic.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 07:12 AM
12

There's a difference between wrong and unprofessional. This is absolutely unprofessional. If I was in that classroom I would have been distracted and not receiving the education I payed for. Hell, the professor herself must have been distracted if she was keeping her kid away from the power sockets. My biggest issue however, is the part we she is now the victim of hostile work environment and that shit. Grow the fuck up lady. If your personal life effects your ability to do your job, your employ…
/r/MensRights12/09/12 08:23 AM
11

Male studies is what he wants. Men's studies was created by academic feminists and is just as anti men.
/r/MensRights11/09/12 06:51 PM
28

The even more radical notion that Women & MEN are people
/r/MensRights09/09/12 08:08 AM
3

ritalin is already being administered to crush human spirit in young boys.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 02:07 AM
5

Genetically enhanced to be no violent, compliant and productive worker drones, GovernmentCorp will be pleased. I have a genetic illness and it would be wonderful to have never had it. But this needs to be limited to real medical conditions that result in physical or mental handicaps. Go watch the movie Gattaca.
/r/MensRights09/09/12 01:07 AM
3

By putting a woman on a pedestal the man is demonstrating that there is a difference of value in the relationship and that she has more value than him. By doing this they are making this statement: "I am not worthy of you, you could do better." When women get this message, is it any wonder the cheat/divorce the men that pedestalized them?
/r/MensRights06/09/12 04:34 AM
2

Well that was the most pointless thing I've seen all day. And I just watched the Oogieloves trailer.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 08:20 AM
22

Remember that Southpark episode where the human atheists were fighting a holy war against the otter atheists in the future? The time has come.
/r/MensRights04/09/12 07:41 AM
6

With a tazer, pepper spray, a gun, a kevlar vest, and 20 squad cars rushing on the way, fuck yes I could.
/r/MensRights02/09/12 06:39 AM
11

SRS isn't people
/r/MensRights30/08/12 06:17 PM
2

UW as in Washington or Wisconsin? When I applied in 99 to the U of Washington affirmative action for women was still in full effect. I distinctly remember there being this chart listing your GPA and your SAT to figure out your probability of getting in. I remember being in the 55% and that if I had been a female minority I would have been 80%. Honestly, not being accepted to the UW was the first event that moved me away from being a whiteknight.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 07:05 AM
5

I went to a liberal arts college. There were 3 automatic scholarships that new students got their first year. 1 was for being a minority, 1 was from being from Alaska, and the other was for being a women. I'm glad things are changing but I have a hard time believing men are on equal footing.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 06:36 AM
2

Those scholarships were available to men and women. There are many women only scholarships, there is only 1 male only scholarship to my knowledge.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 06:26 AM
12

we are men, therefore we are not supposed to complain about our problems, we are supposed to fix the problems of everyone else. They are worried that if we work on our own problems, no one will be around to fix their problems.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 06:35 AM
3

PUA is mostly a methodology to operate in a messed up system, and in that, it depends on the system being messed up. Why would they want to fix when they can use it to their advantage, until they crash and burn from the high risk behavior.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 12:30 AM
-2

LOL, I kinda want to read these, I can never resist a train wreck.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 04:37 AM
2

209K men died, I'm playing the odds that one of them played an instrument. Even if the rolls for women were different, that woman's roll was always voluntary, mens rolls are compulsory.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 07:30 AM
7

meanwhile, on the beaches of Normandy. Musicians were shot to death in order to liberate Europe, they didn't have the option to quit in order to protect their hands.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 06:27 AM
11

forced to live a lie. Resentment it 3.2.1
/r/MensRights25/08/12 02:48 AM
5

See see, the system works for men too. Just like steam engines work by stuffing dollar bills into the firebox.
/r/MensRights25/08/12 02:44 AM
2

you're a troll
/r/MensRights22/08/12 10:37 PM
2

Oh look, quote mining.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 08:27 PM
11

They care about the money, not the men.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 05:17 AM
18

by the same logic, if baby girls were circumcised to a point where sex became non pleasurable, there would be a ton less unmarried mothers. How much money would that save? but it's only a legitimate argument if it's only going to effect men.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 05:15 AM
8

As a person who just saved a ton of money on my car insurance by switching to Geico, I would have to agree that a person like that would be annoying. My room mate, who just spent last night in a Holiday Inn Express concurs.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 05:06 AM
35

The article is over a year old and the wage gap persists. It just never dies.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 06:55 AM
7

So patriarchy is cause by mothers. I can live with that.
/r/MensRights15/08/12 06:26 PM
7

I have a question for Rebecca. Would you like to go back to my room for some coffee? I have a follow up question. What if it were tea? Excuse me, how about orange juice? Uh huh. Not even if it were fresh squeeze? Tepid water then? From a bottle, from a bottle! I'm not going to have you drinking some peasant tap water. Still offensive? How about food then. How about some eggs and some delicious country ham? What if it were green?
/r/MensRights15/08/12 04:22 AM
6

How do you empower someone else? Feminists have claimed to do this for 40 years, and the result has been larger and larger feminist/government organizations and more and more women hopelessly addicted to the crumbs those agencies dole out. Why would men want that? Feminists oppose equality. Their actions are proof of that. You and the GMP want to hold feminism beyond criticism, then of what good are you?
/r/MensRights15/08/12 12:42 AM
2

If you identify yourself as an egalitarian anti-feminist. Then instead of being tolled you're anti-equality, you will be asked "but feminism is for equality?" And then you can correct them.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 06:28 PM
2

Obviously, because it takes a BA in feminist studies to decipher that.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 06:24 PM
4

News flash: humans are sexual beings and the male of the human species is stimulated visually more than the female. If you want to be viewed as an androgynous being, I would suggest you start by not wearing low cut shirts, push up bras and designer butt rounding jeans. This might get you started. http://compare.ebay.com/like/130724562864?var=lv&ltyp=AllFixedPriceItemTypes&var=sbar
/r/MensRights14/08/12 05:52 AM
5

I guess the closest situation would be seeing a hot woman in a tight swimsuit vs. seeking an obese woman in a tight swimsuit. Though I think most men don't go out of their way to shame those women.
/r/MensRights14/08/12 05:36 AM
5

I have notice a lot of you have the wrong idea of what a feminist really is. False It is you who don't know what feminism is. Feminism is defined by it's actions.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 11:26 PM
1

http://youtu.be/v_WKYfOHDTY
/r/MensRights12/08/12 09:46 PM
0

Oh look, the OP was a concern troll after all. Big fucking surprise.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 07:42 PM
0

A female who believe in men's rights needs to speak up about the injustices men face, not tell men who speak up about those injustices to be quiet and ask nicely. Fuck you and Fuck her. There are real men in prison for crimes they didn't commit. Real men in debtors prison, Real men who have had their children, property and income stolen from them. Real men denied educational opportunity. Real men in need of medical care, Real men who are beaten or raped by females and have no where to go.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 07:38 PM
0

So you support men having rights, but only if those men are nice and don't speak up about their pain? Fuck you. Quit attempting to censor me. The argument that men deserve rights stands on it's own regardless of tone.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 06:23 PM
2

Where do these people even come from? The school system, or day time TV.
/r/MensRights12/08/12 05:43 PM
3

Getting one to yield power has rarely come easily, and in the public dialog on gender, feminism holds the power.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 11:45 PM
5

MRA's blame feminism for the draft Wrong MRA's point to feminism's failure to lobby for the drafting of women proof that feminism isn't for equality.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 10:14 PM
8

in comparison to this, fox news is fair and balanced.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 08:04 AM
2

I honestly don't care what standard we use, just not the double standard.
/r/MensRights11/08/12 01:48 AM
1

But the majority of the white poor are rural poor. Before the great migration to the suburbs in the 40's and 50's the majority of gang violence was committed by whatever the current flavor of immigrant population was getting off the boat in Ellis island. For what ever reason, poor people in high density population parts of cities with severely limited upward mobility act out violently, the color of their skin doesn't figure into it. It just so happens that majority of the ghetto population is cu…
/r/MensRights10/08/12 11:53 PM
5

Were the last 2 paragraphs written by someone else?
/r/MensRights10/08/12 11:34 PM
1

Black people do not commit more crimes because they are black. Poor people tend to commit more crimes and there is alot of poor blacks, I stated that classism explains a portion of the disparity. Also, the poor, black populations are subject to harsher policing, increased prosecution and don't have proper resources for competent legal defense. While that may not be racism through law, it is racism through policy.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 11:13 PM
1

How the police treat African Americans, especially in urban areas is the one that I find the most ugly. Also the US has a higher percentage of our black citizens in prison currently than during any time of apartheid in South Africa. It's true that classism accounts for part of this disparity. It is also true that the laws are color blind, but just like how men are treated by family courts, the written and unwritten policies are practiced on the street level is discriminatory ways.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 07:31 PM
3

There are some in the civil rights movement that have realized that a victim identity hasn't gotten the black community anywhere and are starting to push against that mindset. I applaud and support those people as I think that will be the most effective path towards healthy race relations. Unfortunately, the habit of exchanging votes for government handouts is a hard one to break.
/r/MensRights10/08/12 07:17 PM
1

I'm not sure if I read you correctly but I'm not sure what "redditor for 11 minutes" has to do with anything? Because you have no history we can only conclude that you are this weeks concern troll. http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Concern_troll
/r/MensRights10/08/12 07:04 PM
1

If you speak up on behalf of men you're labeled a misogynist and dismissed If you speak up on behalf of white people you're labeled a racist/KKK member and dismissed. While Patriarchy never really existed, racism sure has hell did and continues in some forms, so these situations aren't exactly equivalent. However keeping whites silent in the racial debate will be just as harmful and keeping men silent in the gender debate. It's just not politically correct to point out that eventuality at this t…
/r/MensRights10/08/12 06:47 PM
6

you are again using manipulation. 5 year olds are not infants, yet your study is about 0-5 year olds. It is department of justice statistics, so only convictions are going to be counted, and we all know how women are less likely to be held accountable by the justice system. Regardless of all that, there is a fucking difference between 1 person being mistaken and a network of government funded agencies publishing and advocating on falsified data.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 06:06 AM
12

We aren't feminists. We don't need to lie, manipulate and censor to make our point.
/r/MensRights07/08/12 03:45 AM
4

You're a slavery apologist!
/r/MensRights06/08/12 08:38 AM
5

The reason the courts grant women custody of the children in family court is because the patriarchy is enforcing the stereotype of women as caregiver. This means that having your children live with you is patriarchal oppression. It would also mean that when NOW issues action statements to block shared parenting laws, they become agents of the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 05:32 AM
9

But if you mention it like that it won't be denigrating to men.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 04:32 AM
1

a whole new reddit account just to say ads are bad. You apparently have more time on your hands then you let on.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 01:45 AM
3

http://youtu.be/X8u7px_GzWQ
/r/MensRights05/08/12 12:43 AM
-4

http://lmgtfy.com/?q=credibility
/r/MensRights05/08/12 12:40 AM
7

patriarchy caused feminists to write that legislation. You can't blame feminists for what feminism does.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 12:36 AM
13

patriarchy causes feminism do that.
/r/MensRights05/08/12 12:16 AM
5

It's bait and switch propaganda. Come for free debate/ adopt our ideology or shut up.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 11:37 PM
12

I love how the SPLC pretends to "shine the light" on hate while not publishing the names of those who write the articles that informs their opinions.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 11:30 PM
11

Because not wanting men to die makes us a hate group. Though it's nice to know that racism and poverty are no longer issues in this country to the degree that they have time to waste on us.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 05:57 PM
2

but when a woman has had a drink and then consents to sex, feminism now considers that rape. So if women don't drink, then the number of rapes will go down dramatically simply because they would then be legally allowed to consent. You can't fault the logic (presupposing drinking voids ability to consent)
/r/MensRights04/08/12 05:36 AM
5

That sucks.
/r/MensRights04/08/12 05:03 AM
5

Traditional gender roles were created and enforced by men AND women. Both genders made sacrifices in order to improve the efficiency of the community as a whole. If you take an honest look at history, what you are going to find is billions of men providing and protecting the women and children of their communities out of love and duty. Likewise you will find billions of women birthing and raising the next generation also out of love and duty. There is no doubt that individual self-determination …
/r/MensRights03/08/12 09:40 PM
-2

You are the one generalizing. Feminsts doesn't equal all women, men's rights doesn't equal all men and gay rights doesn't equal all gays. As you've said, Gay rights have essentially been one, with this I agree. There are some within the gay rights movement that are now setting up to justify their existence by putting gays in the same roll as perpetual victims that the feminists do women. If gay rights falls to this ideology, they will not be allies with men's rights.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 05:29 PM
-15

I am wary of gay-rights for 1 reason, and that is patriarchy. A gay friend of mine wrote a thesis for a graduate program, the subject was how patriarchy is responsible for discrimination against gays. Oh how I hate that word and the bigotry it represents. The liberals will offer you a home if your an activist, but you have to identify as a victim, focus your activism against the straight white male, and vote for the liberal candidate that will use tax money to make you feel better.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 08:24 AM
8

she is a free thinker, so she can think what she wants and doesn't have to worry about silly things like facts.
/r/MensRights03/08/12 08:05 AM
-1

The cost of labor is rising. Looks like slavery is becoming a necessary evil. Let's get those blacks back in the cotton fields. OH WAIT! EVIL IS EVIL! That's why we no longer do it. It's not for economic reasons, or reasons of efficiency or because it would be easier. No. We no longer have slavery because it is ethically reprehensible.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 08:26 AM
-1

Yes, now accidental pregnancies will more likely be accidentally on purpose pregnancies. Now there is NO excuse if a woman gets pregnant, but I'm sure feminism is going to maintain any excuse as to why he must pay.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 07:09 AM
0

DV screening are now free for women, not for men. DV happens to both genders. Don't hold your breath for male contraceptive to be covered.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 06:58 AM
2

You're right, it's not comparable. Having sex is an elected activity. Therefore, the need to have birth control depends on your choices to participate in sex. I, and people like me have no choice in the real medical conditions requiring high priced medicine to treat. So what we have is again, woman's choices are being financed, people who need medicine aren't given the help they need.
/r/MensRights02/08/12 06:55 AM
1

Okay, I'm forced to pay for it through my insurance premiums. Either way I am forced to pay by the government. The point of insurance is to pay a moderate amount of money monthly so that if you get hit by large medical bills it doesn't cripple your finances. Paying insurance in order to receive nominally priced drugs will only pad the profit margin for insurance companies and drive premiums up (mine just went up this month). There are more pharmacies then planned parenthood, so there is a vast d…
/r/MensRights02/08/12 06:47 AM
9

You could just look at the bias that exists in sociology its self. Investigate the false stats feminists use, compare them to the real stats and examine the rationality of how one abandons bias to get the results they want to find. Wage gap, domestic violence etc.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 10:53 PM
10

I have a medical condition. This condition is treatable with weekly medication, however I can not afford the $20000 per year the medication costs and my meager insurance doesn't cover it. At least I can sleep well knowing the president has helped the burden of women to play $200 a year out of pocket for birth control with my tax money.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 08:19 PM
3

They is feminist+government You don't get it. This is not just some philosophic difference. We have all lost something. Access to our kids, our presumption of innocence, access to education, have had property and money taken, we are incarcerated, and all of this because we are male and the other party is female. For us it is personal. You're and equity feminist who believes in equality by opportunity. Congratulations, have a cookie. Feminism is cancerous and is currently working against that whi…
/r/MensRights01/08/12 07:14 PM
1

They've taken our kids they've taken our civil liberties they've taken our money they've taken our property they've taken our good name. On these there can be no compromise. We need these back before any bridges can be built. We fight for these, feminists actively fight against them. Your house is on fire. That the feminist movement is willing to promote increased gains for women at the expense of men and children is indicative of that. This is what feminism does as a whole.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 05:54 PM
4

fatherhood is not a crime. A man with a child is not worthy of investigation.
/r/MensRights01/08/12 07:59 AM
2

Hugo is the zombie apocalypse. Shoot it in the head!!!!(jk)
/r/MensRights01/08/12 03:44 AM
5

apparently he dosn't know his audience this time. He's getting slammed in the comments.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 11:00 PM
4

why don't they write "height/weight appropriate women free. Men $20. Fat chicks $50." Then they'll get the crowd they want. To the feminist that is about to down vote this, you're a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 10:47 PM
1

It becomes a problem in the context where every male social space has been litigated to extinction by feminists.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 10:41 PM
1

"Sexist Bitch!" then keep on jogging.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 10:32 PM
1

Really? Their chosen title gives away their position.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 10:22 PM
1

not you, the guy who I think is insinuating that squirming = audible statement of non consent.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 06:01 PM
1

So instead of deflecting the question, how about you try to answer it.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 08:38 AM
19

The other half of your problem is letting others treat you like that. You poor a drink on me and we're staying in the same place, your will find your shit thrown out on a snow heap and the door locked behind you.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 07:27 AM
0

I quit reading a "women were subjugated" Traditional gender roles were created and enforced by men AND women. Both genders made sacrifices in order to improve the efficiency of the community as a whole. Get off this men were the evil masterminds throughout history. If you take an honest look at history, what you are going to find is billions of men providing and protecting the women and children of their communities out of love and duty.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 02:13 AM
18

Men are people too Stop trying to silence us with your denigrating lies. We've had enough.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 02:00 AM
1

Yes, there are two different kinds of feminists, and there is a huge power imbalance between the two. The kind of feminists that we can respect and work with need to tend their fires at home before they are at a place where we are able to work with them.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 12:04 AM
8

we're a trolling subreddit now?
/r/MensRights30/07/12 05:48 AM
-1

Look at those men oppressing that poor woman by preventing her from work.
/r/MensRights29/07/12 06:10 AM
2

here is a good feminist explaining why bad feminists are bad. (skip the 6 minute introduction) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1KrA4BQ6rAY
/r/MensRights28/07/12 04:05 AM
2

that's just an inconvenient technicality. All men are evil, see! see!
/r/MensRights28/07/12 03:26 AM
1

It's been the standard operating procedure around here for quite some time. Don't take it personally.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 03:25 AM
1

I agree with this, but sexes reversed and current definitions, this would be rape.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 02:58 AM
2

Um, something can still be Orwellian and be privately owned.
/r/MensRights28/07/12 02:46 AM
2

Inaccurate political messages with heavily moderated comments censoring dissenting opinion, is that not the definition of propaganda. Fucking cowards.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 09:19 PM
1

The church has always been a family centric institution. As the man has become an unimportant part of the family, so the man has become an unimportant member of a church. Add to that the weird fetish the church has in believing sexual sin is extra bad sin (and only male sexuality is sinful) it makes the church a very unwelcoming place for men. And that's sad.
/r/MensRights27/07/12 04:16 AM
29

Yes, obviously he's advocating rape and not wanting to criticize a system where women manipulate men to satisfy their entitled desires.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 04:20 AM
9

I think 8 of those 24 can be a legitimate base for arguments.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 03:30 AM
7

Expressio unius est exclusio alterius (The express mention of one thing excludes all others). Not hitting a woman BECAUSE SHES A WOMAN implies that men would be hit in same situation. Having a different standard for men and women is always a detriment to equality regardless of context.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 02:16 AM
7

a double standard based on sex, no matter what the context, is discrimination, is contrary to an equal society, and will not be tolerated here. You're white knight attitude of infantilizing women and protecting them of the effects of their choices is not helping women become agents of their own lives, and harms the men left to be responsible for situations they had no control over.
/r/MensRights21/07/12 01:48 AM
1

So actual loving parents want to spend time with their children, most parents don't view their children as a penalty. Women do not risk spending less time with their children by filing for devorce. Women who want to split time can negotiate for that. Essentially, a woman get's to negotiate for however much time she wants. She has influence and options that men don't and they risk less.
/r/MensRights20/07/12 11:54 PM
2

So like I said OP. Victim feminism will only interpret the world in a way to portray themselves as victims and will blame men/Patriarchy for any real or imagined problem w/o regard to how men are effected.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 08:07 PM
3

it's when you're a man and use logic and reason to explain something to a woman and she FEELS that what you are saying isn't correct and is thus oppressing her voice or some nonsense. In other words "I'm not going to listen to you because you are a man"
/r/MensRights19/07/12 07:02 PM
3

Governments, the ones where over 52% of the voting base is women and those governments that create special programs favoring women. Corporations that market more towards women than men. Media, like the news organizations that have at least 1 menu for womans articles and none for men? Just because the top of the organization pyramid is a man doesn't mean focus of the organization is male. That's an apex fallacy.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 06:29 PM
17

There are many kinds of feminism but they can largely be fit into two camps. The first have been termed equal opportunity feminists, they believe that men and women should have equal opportunity to achieve what they individually desire, no one is held back, and no one gets special treatment. The MRA community could build bridges with these feminist because we have many things in common. However, this is not the majority of feminism, or atleast, it is not the vocal majority of feminism. The 2nd k…
/r/MensRights19/07/12 07:13 AM
3

yes, but when you do it, it's not objectifying/sexist because you don't have any power like all men do.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 07:38 AM
13

Oh look. It's another one of those articles. No, I didn't read it, but I know everything it has to say(and towards which audience it was written).
/r/MensRights16/07/12 07:19 AM
10

But why come to you, you're a man? She's so hateful towards men but so locked into a traditional mindset that the first place she turns to is a man.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 07:11 AM
2

If 1 in 4 college women were really raped, there would be a ton fewer women attending college. The idea that this isn't just dismissed in passing is absurd and proves just how dug in this ideology is in our culture.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 04:57 AM
3

It sucks that you had to stoop to her level, but it's the only real way to solve that situation. Be careful from here on, good luck.
/r/MensRights16/07/12 01:47 AM
8

how nice of her to be the one to judge what is "fair speech" Oh look, everyone who agrees with her is fair speech, all other hate speech.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 10:05 PM
18

from the summary context of her book "Feminist theory of equality calls for Fair Speech rather than Free Speech"
/r/MensRights13/07/12 10:37 AM
1

While and ideal sample would be more than 3500 people, the sample size is the least of the survey's problems.
/r/MensRights13/07/12 05:52 AM
7

the former still creates the latter.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 03:50 AM
4

If this happens, it will be the downfall of title9 or the downfall of america's economy as the worlds leader.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 07:30 AM
0

This guy has done a great job of pointing out examples. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p6gLmcS3-NI Also, Sarkeesian is not objective in her pursuit of discovering sexism. In her kickstarter video she already announced the conclusion of her thesis, this indicates that the project itself will only be collecting examples that can be fit into her ideology and ignoring all else. This is the opposite of objectivity. Controversial public people (of which Anita is) get death threats. That I know of, the…
/r/MensRights10/07/12 08:25 PM
-1

I'm not English so you may technically be right, but I've seen enough British television to know that violence set in a fictional/humorous setting won't be prosecuted as encouraging violence.
/r/MensRights10/07/12 03:08 AM
0

A) Obama get's 30 death threats a day http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/barackobama/5967942/Barack-Obama-faces-30-death-threats-a-day-stretching-US-Secret-Service.html Glen Beck claims about 15 threats at any given time http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/barackobama/5967942/Barack-Obama-faces-30-death-threats-a-day-stretching-US-Secret-Service.html B) Now no one deserves death threats, including members of the KKK. However, she did bring this negative attention on herself. I have …
/r/MensRights10/07/12 02:16 AM
-2

The more recent article (by the same author) has no mention of death threats or any other activity of questionable legality other than ddos attacks. http://www.newstatesman.com/blogs/internet/2012/07/what-online-harassment-looks Why no mention of death threats now? Thus I must assume it is no longer an immediate issue. Perhaps that's being a bit dismissive, but I do find it odd that death threats aren't mentioned in a newer article. Understand that I don't condone death threats, or ddos attacks;…
/r/MensRights10/07/12 12:58 AM
-5

Why is a video game of punching Anita harassment? Why are video games of shooting/punching other public figures okay(of which there are hundreds)? This is only "harassment" because she is a woman/feminist, it is also the only reason why this is getting media attention. It's much easy for feminists to cry harassment then directly face criticism.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 11:45 PM
2

what do I win?
/r/MensRights08/07/12 06:35 PM
1

Where were you when: http://www.whackit.co/whack_your_ex_boyfriend.html http://www.pintgames.com/free-games/16669/Beat-Up-Trump.html ooh, but those don't target girls, so not harassment because feminism.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 07:32 PM
0

GREATBIGDIC on sexual attraction: it is offensive and degrading
/r/MensRights07/07/12 05:40 PM
0

OMG! satire and hyperbole. Oppression!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
/r/MensRights07/07/12 05:36 PM
1

All other non-feminists know this concept as personal accountability.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 05:34 PM
1

"Underscoring this point is the fact that there is something that calls itself a Men’s Rights Movement, but it consists of nothing but knee-jerk anti-feminism. It is made up primarily of angry, alienated men who have fully bought into the myths of hegemonic masculinity and gender roles, and not found the success and happiness that the myths implicitly promised. Since feminism is the only movement around that is attempting to dismantle those myths, they conclude that feminism is the cause of thei…
/r/MensRights07/07/12 08:30 AM
-1

How is this different that a political cartoonist making fun of a politician? Or a pinata of a politician? I now feel so sorry for G. W. Bush and the 8 years every media outlet constantly took shots at him. She's the one who put herself and her opinion out there. If she hates men/masculinity/male sexuality so much she shouldn't be surprised if men hate her back.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 05:29 AM
0

How is this not just another: "Men, Man up and quit expressing your emotions and think about how you are making feminists feel"? PC is censorship.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 09:51 PM
0

yes, you did. and that only proves that the MRM's identification that feminism today is only concerned with ways to further benefit exclusively women, it has nothing to do with equality, or else it wouldn't need to use the modifier.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 08:38 PM
0

but we aren't children.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 06:22 AM
1

We don't even have the technology to put images on our sidebar, so it couldn't have been us.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 06:04 AM
32

you're being much too kind.
/r/MensRights06/07/12 06:03 AM
2

I would try to find that happy medium to coddling girls/ letting boys cry it out when they get hurt/upset. I think it's important to develop some physical/mental/emotional toughness and I think this is where it starts. No whining, and no puppy-dog girl eyes no matter how cute, it will not get you what you want. I would try to steer her away from the Disney princess movies I would teach my kids the Aesop fables when they were young and some classical philosophy as they grow to establish a base of…
/r/MensRights06/07/12 04:58 AM
4

I'm not a fan of these subreddits but arn't these subreddits primarily the result of the protected nature women get by the PC culture? When people don't hit women, constantly get bombarded by messages not to beat women and are treated in ways the presume that they are woman beaters, it makes sense that an r/beatingwomen exists as a satirical/hyperbole backlash.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 02:09 AM
1

Yes, he did. Yes, it happens Yes, it's a disgusting thing (also adam sandler made a movie about it, cause it's funny)
/r/MensRights05/07/12 01:15 AM
4

are you aware that you just used a modifier on the word equality? Equality is for all, or else the word is not being used for it's true meaning.
/r/MensRights05/07/12 01:07 AM
2

I would say sign it, then under your signature put "under duress" There's no point in making a stand until your number's called, and hopefully that won't happen. And if you don't sign, you forfeit the ability to get a government job (and many private jobs that contract with the government) social security and other government programs.
/r/MensRights29/06/12 10:11 PM
2

I would much rather have a child then go to prison/be on a sex registry for life.
/r/MensRights21/06/12 08:19 PM
2

what crappy RPG do you play where you aren't allowed to choose the sex of your character?
/r/MensRights19/06/12 01:37 AM
4

that choice being to stop playing on an increasingly tilted playing field.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 06:22 PM
1

So a woman goes to a party and drinks, she has to hit the .15 so that 2-3 drinks. Now she can act in what ever way she wants including forcibly having sex with sober men, and it will be her that is raped. or vindictive woman has consensual, sober sex. Immediately afterward drives to police station while having 3 shots. She tests over .15, rape kit comes positive for sex, man gets life ruined. How about we just hold people accountable for the decisions they make while drunk, it was there decision…
/r/MensRights12/05/12 10:26 PM
62

Mom tip #7 Baby waking you up at night? Don't drown the baby in the tub. Mom tip #12 Can't find babysit while you want to go out. Don't leave baby in a dumpster. Mom tip #2 Baby won't stop crying. Don't smother baby with a pillow.
/r/MensRights09/05/12 07:52 AM
9

and you don't seem to know the definition of a true Scotsman
/r/MensRights03/05/12 04:19 PM
1

It's likely just showtime's want to be "edgy" by exploring counter culture ideas. The deconstruction of the Dummy Daddy and the Supper Mommy are over due. I haven't seen USoT, I'll have to check that out.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 10:28 PM
2

good show, but it depends on the episode. Some of them have her leading Peter around on a leash and getting upset over what should be minor misunderstandings.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 10:24 PM
0

Southpark, season 16 episode 1 "Reverse Cowgirl". You tell me that isn't a satire of victim blaming.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 10:23 PM
0

I have to agree. 90% chance that it's satire, 10% that it's a women's studies dissertation.
/r/MensRights02/05/12 06:20 AM
9

No, the SPLC is not a social network site where one can simply sign up and post what they want to the site. The members who have access to produce content for the SPLC is chosen and overseen by the SPLC and there for the content on the SPLC site is representative of the whole. If this is just one rogue "yokel" then he/she needs to be removed, a retraction issued, and an apology on behalf of the SPLC to those named. Also, just because MRA sites didn't make an official list, does not excuse the im…
/r/MensRights18/04/12 07:22 PM
2

Men don't fantasize about a world w/o women. If for some reason all the woman on the planet were to die, men would devout countless resources to geneticists to bring them back and would face minimal if any political resistance to do so. I would like to think that a world of women would go to the same effort for men, but from what I have see from feminism, I am not confident about it.
/r/MensRights14/04/12 10:53 PM
-1

If it's affordable. If not it will only help the top of the economic pyramid freeing them up to pass even harsher laws on lower class men who father unwanted children.
/r/MensRights28/03/12 11:27 PM
12

Another article that started off promising and then tanked into solution more feminism/man up.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 06:43 AM
0

If they did this in the states, It would actually get me to start taking public transportation just to FTSU like Rosa Parks.
/r/MensRights23/03/12 06:08 AM
-1

It doesn't take a criminal investigation to ruin a reputation.
/r/MensRights20/03/12 04:36 AM
0

Is there any entitlement program that didn't end up costing more than expected and ending up making the problem it was designed to fix worse?
/r/MensRights20/03/12 04:15 AM
2

it's a consequence for a man, its a list of choices for a woman. You can go white knight somewhere else now.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 08:46 PM
2

Woo! We live in a culture where not being a father is a reason to celebrate.
/r/MensRights17/03/12 08:44 PM
-10

Just like all white people are okay with racists because they're on their side?
/r/MensRights17/03/12 06:23 PM
5

just tell her "that's sexist" and take them anyway.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 05:32 AM
1

If it's at the front counter for anyone to take, take some.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 09:35 PM
0

Apparently it's only worth reporting when the government takes children away from women is secret courtrooms. Not so fun now is it women? Oh well, hopefully this leads to changes that help everyone.
/r/MensRights12/03/12 07:57 PM
0

I'm not arguing that droves of men die on screen for every woman. There are revenge movies where a man kills many people, mostly men but some women and is the protagonist of the piece. But you are right, acceptable violence against men by women if film is vastly more prevalent then the reverse, it's also more acceptable in our society and is thus much easier to get by the censors. The point I make is that these characters are not awarded or thanked for their actions, thus they are not heroes. Ag…
/r/MensRights11/03/12 08:54 PM
4

the first rule of SRS apparently is "dont get caught"
/r/MensRights11/03/12 07:04 PM
0

hero and protagonist are not the same thing. It is a revenge film and the bride is the protagonist of the narrative of revenge and it is the motivation of revenge that makes the bride relatable, not her person (she is an assassin after all)
/r/MensRights11/03/12 07:03 PM
1

Thelma and Louise were pursued by the cops for their crimes, The bride in Kill Bill was a former assassin, they may be protagonists to the narrative, but they aren't heroes. Yes, it's thinly veiled, but it is a line the major hollywood productions has yet to cross (to my knowledge). True snuff films are an urban legend, fictional snuff films are an actual genre and abundant.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 06:26 AM
0

The woman in these films are not "heroes" except by those who would see valerie solanas as a hero. The characters in these films are anti-heroes and just happen to be the main character and is quite the common motif of the deconstructionist era. The men abusing women are very common in the woman in prison, cannibal-splotaion, Nazi-splotation and of course the snuff sub-genres.
/r/MensRights11/03/12 05:29 AM
3

I would argue that blindly labeling a political group you don't agree with a hate group is itself hateful.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 06:51 AM
4

really? I'm overreacting by stating they are incompetent when it comes to identifying who is a hate group and who isn't?
/r/MensRights10/03/12 01:40 AM
-1

the SPLC is the only group that ought to be listed by them as a hate group as they obviously aren't capable of doing the research required to make such decisions.
/r/MensRights10/03/12 12:00 AM
-1

oh look, concern troll is concerned.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 06:01 AM
25

no, only the men trying to do good.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 05:39 AM
2

That was my reaction. It could have been much worse, luckily she always kept it in the context that it was a dream so few people took her seriously. My girlfriend at the time babysat for her which is how she knew me. She warned my GF about me and when my GF didn't take her seriously, she started spreading it to other women in our social circle.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 07:05 PM
10

In college a girl had a dream where I was a rapist and warned women on campus because of it. Accused of inappropriate conduct with a teenage girl while I was volunteering with an after school program for receiving a hug from her. Being told by my professors that my post graduate career goals would not be successful because of me being an introvert and male. Every class I took that portrayed social problems from a man perpetrator woman victim mindset. The custody battles of my uncle and a friend …
/r/MensRights06/03/12 06:54 AM
4

Or, Homeless people don't have the burden of property tax.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 04:15 AM
2

I'd go with this.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 03:16 AM
1

We are still here and we are still growing.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 08:58 AM
2

Beauty and the Beast is the worst. Besides the obvious women beautiful men are beasts of the story, Disney actually equates men with pigs. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gpRz6L_C7hc The first song in Marry Poppins calls men stupid (sung by a woman who has no job and has 2 maids and a nanny to help with the housework) Apparently in the book, the main character is the father. The book covers his childhood where overbearing parents taught him the hard work was the only aspect of life worth pursuing…
/r/MensRights02/03/12 09:06 AM
1

"Everyone does what they want" This is a good example for why it won't work. In your sentence, is everyone doing what they individually want, or is everyone doing what an individual of unspecified sex wants them to do.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 06:36 AM
1

Why don't you inform me on how feminist lobbying has helped men in the past 70 years?
/r/MensRights29/02/12 09:05 AM
0

Oh, let me guess. Mens problems aren't because of 70 years of feminist lobbying, it's because "the Patriarchy" hurts men too?
/r/MensRights29/02/12 07:50 AM
1

Yeah, I've seen what a wonderful positive force feminism can be. Can we spend time with our kids now?
/r/MensRights29/02/12 07:18 AM
3

I am very against the idea that the way to help men in our culture is more feminism, it's like giving a gun shot victim more bullets. And you obviously don't know the first thing about "fucking respect".
/r/MensRights29/02/12 06:33 AM
3

but feminism is the cause of harmful stereotypes of men. Telling us that we need to work with feminism is ignorant and insulting.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 06:13 AM
1

It doesn't matter who's telling the truth, the man still has first amendment rights
/r/MensRights29/02/12 05:48 AM
2

shouldn't a real Facebook account have a longer history of wall posts?
/r/MensRights26/02/12 11:07 AM
14

How much sexism have I suffered at school and how did you become an MRA could both be titles for pretty much the same story for myself. False Rape rumors. I went to a small private christian college (about 200 students) so the community was very small, every one knew each other and gossip could spread fast. One female student had a dream in which I was a rapist. Because of this dream, she thought it was her duty to warn the female population of the college about me. The majority of people didn't…
/r/MensRights26/02/12 10:59 AM
0

There as a very practical reasons women were encouraged to remain virginal before the existence of the well fare state.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 06:57 PM
1

What, the public at large don't properly understand something and a more popular but wrong version is completely is out there but impossible to stop circulating. Also see Rape statistic DV statistics False allegations statistics Wage gap myth Feminism is based on the premise of viral deception.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 06:51 PM
2

Feminists claim to be about equality. If this is true, then your opinions, you perspective, your values and your experiences are just as valid as any of hers. You have the right to be offended when someone makes a denigrating remark about your gender. (now comes the part you might not want to hear) If your relationship is fully healthy, you would be able to express these things. If I read you right, I guess that you have been avoiding conflict to keep the peace. This conflict is going to have to…
/r/MensRights22/02/12 09:44 AM
3

There are many feeding programs that can always use more volunteers. I cook twice a year for one of the local ones, which happened to be 2 weeks ago. Just under 350 served. The 95% of homeless are male is absolutely true, also the majority of homeless are minorities. Those guys really appreciate a hot, home cooked meal.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 04:51 AM
7

This is the political equivalent of her taking her ball and going home.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 09:12 PM
7

She is falsely accusing you. She has betrayed your trust. She does not love you. She does not deserve your love or the love of any man. She is not the person you thought she was. Move on. Read up on the 5th&6th amendment and don't talk to any authorities w/o a lawyer. What you tolled her can not be used against you, they will however attempt to trick you into repeating it.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 06:43 AM
5

for you, yes, it is too much to ask.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 04:12 AM
1

On their "anti-discrimination" page you are directed to several links, the first being: "This is a short, accessible piece on white privilege and male privilege."
/r/MensRights20/02/12 04:44 AM
2

My favorite FAQ is "Question: You’re just a bunch of prudes, then. Answer: Like we said, this has nothing to do with sex, and everything to do with power." You bet your sweet ass it does.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 04:29 AM
-4

Doesn't Japan have the highest abortion rate. I would be LMAO if feminism ultimately fails by revoking abortion rights to save the population growth rate.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 09:12 AM
2

Was there a particular event that became the turning point to you becoming an MRA? Oh, and congratulations on your Mod-hood.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 04:44 AM
1

Traditional viewpoints? such as returning to traditional sex roles? or am I reading too much into this statement? Not trying to be disrespectful.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 04:39 AM
7

A we have lift off. [link]http://playerversusfrustration.wordpress.com/2012/02/17/the-conflation-of-legality-and-morality/ "There are a lot of things I can do without being arrested. I can lie to my friends, call strangers obscene names, and fart in elevators. None of those are crimes. But if I fart in an elevator and respond to everyone telling me I’m an asshole by saying, “Hey, it’s legal!”, I’ll be laughed at for making such a fatuous argument. The same thing goes for rape and child porn apol…
/r/MensRights18/02/12 03:04 AM
-3

Remember, these are empowered women, not whores, because feminism...
/r/MensRights16/02/12 07:58 PM
7

Our My special day. These woman's crazy is showing.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 07:53 PM
-2

There's nothing to stop a men's rights party, it just won't get any votes. I know that there is currently a feminist party in either Iraq or Afghanistan. Nice to see our boys died for a good cause.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 06:48 AM
2

I thought this was a joke, but then I kept reading.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 06:09 AM
13

Sure, here you go. Good luck on getting your award. Hope you get nominated for a Darwin next.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 08:31 PM
9

Oh look, an SRS goodwill campaign tour. Except instead of goodwill, pompous arrogance and insults. I think you're doing it wrong. Stay classy SRS.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 08:17 PM
2

what are girls going to do with lead?
/r/MensRights14/02/12 05:42 AM
1

Which one? The one that gave me up for adoption, I wouldn't say I hate her but I have no real affinity towards her, I've also never met her. I will add this, I know that my birth mother didn't want me in her life, it is unknown what my biological father wanted. Or are you talking about the mother, who with my father, chose to adopt me. Her I love. Both of my parents have been great influences in my life, and have remained committed to me and my sister (also adopted). I view these as linked. My p…
/r/MensRights14/02/12 05:09 AM
2

no I would not say. equating the use of a condom to chemically controlled fertility and the 9 months of options a woman has once pregnant to abort/adopt is laughable. It also dosn't the fuck matter. Until men are women have equality in parenting rights, the only assholes who are assholes by choice are mothers.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 06:29 PM
21

Can't win an argument, silent those that oppose you. Stay classy SRS.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 06:25 AM
2

accountability is now a punishment?
/r/MensRights13/02/12 05:30 AM
1

but how many of those dads ever wanted a child to begin with? You're argument only has merit once men have the choice to become fathers or not.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 05:27 AM
6

Maybe you should read "To kill a mocking bird" to see how it works out when a community rushes to label the accused as guilty.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 05:03 AM
0

Right, so in your mind there are zero feminist lobbyist, zero feminist political action groups, and zero politicians that identify themselves as feminists. You came in here with the righteous indignation that we all hold misconceptions of feminism. The burden of proof is on you to substantiate your claim.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 09:15 PM
2

And the MRM holds to the even more radical notion that men and women are people. But feel free to prove it wrong that feminism isn't a female supremacy movement. Name one feminist sponsored law that addresses the inequality that men face w/o it also giving preferential treatment to women. I'll be waiting.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 05:03 AM
4

now it's the law
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:50 AM
2

My friends wife separated from him a few months after she started attending this person's church. I can't say I'm surprised.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 04:50 AM
29

It's not necessarily bad for someone to desire a same sex roommate. It would however be better if that was addressed upfront.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 07:57 AM
5

Without a patriarchy there can be no modern feminism. Patriarchy theory is the foundation on which feminist thought is built upon. Feminism views its self as a justice movement and w/o injustice there is nothing to do, so feminists have to find/manufacture it in order to have purpose. Example: (women make less then men) feminists assume this is discrimination(injustice) and work at creating scholarships, carrier management services, hiring quotas, and anti discrimination laws to correct injustic…
/r/MensRights01/02/12 03:01 AM
1

no, buy the term women I refer to the women that the magazine represents. If the magazine represents all women, then in this context all woman are subject to ridicule for the statements that magazine makes on their behalf.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 02:36 AM
1

Do you mean when I said "Why do women deserve respect again?" as in the context of a response to the cover of a popular woman's magazine being thoroughly disrespectful of men from which you derive I am a woman hating pig? You're choice of context is quite convenient for you.
/r/MensRights01/02/12 01:20 AM
1

So they deserve respect period, regardless of if they read cosmo and share in it's lack of respect for men. Your position is that all women deserve respect regardless of actions, beliefs or creeds. But you clearly show by your disrespectful comments to me, that men are not due this base level of unconditional respect. How can you talk about equality when you hold both sides to different standards?
/r/MensRights01/02/12 12:26 AM
2

Well, someone is, over 3 million subscriptions plus who knows how many get picked up at the supermarket checkout. It may not bet he majority, but these magazines and their misandry is pervasive in our culture.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 07:19 AM
2

oh that's right, I'm supposed to respect them or else people like you make presumptive statements designed to insult and shame me.
/r/MensRights31/01/12 07:14 AM
6

female entitlement, yeah I thinks that's related.
/r/MensRights30/01/12 10:25 PM
-5

They forgot to also circle, "Men Fibs: how to catch and stop them" and "I set fire to the restaurant on a date" Why do women deserve respect again?
/r/MensRights30/01/12 10:19 PM
0

I think this is where today's hyper mangina comes from. They are tolled "Men are bad and responsible for the worlds ills, but you my son, are not like that, and I am going whip and shame you to be the best sacrificial servant to women you can be. Not son of mine is going to be just another one of THOSE men, I will fix you."
/r/MensRights27/01/12 07:13 AM
2

When my dog was alive, he would growl and run away from the vacuum cleaner, obviously he was abused by a person with a vacuum.
/r/MensRights26/01/12 12:08 AM
1

nagging is simply whining with a learned expectation of compliance.
/r/MensRights25/01/12 08:44 AM
30

they will be working in pink cubicles on the women only floors
/r/MensRights23/01/12 06:07 AM
1

then your reading comprehension skill suck.
/r/MensRights07/01/12 07:52 PM
10

Maybe you should read all the words.
/r/MensRights07/01/12 07:27 AM
3

I noticed this too. I can't tell if this is a typo or just some made up stat but it puts the list's credibility in doubt. It needs to be edited.
/r/MensRights06/01/12 11:26 PM
2

time to file a restraining order and sue.
/r/MensRights05/01/12 05:41 AM
2

It lessens their economic security by reducing the number of worthy men. It's the same reason men get upset when employers ship jobs over seas, it means less opportunity and less security and also a hit to pride.
/r/MensRights03/01/12 09:52 AM
6

close, but ends up sounding to me that it's talking down to fathers. The idea that when one has kids they must flush all their dreams down the crapper is terrible. The best fathers I know are ones that make time for themselves to keep up on their hobbies.
/r/MensRights01/01/12 10:06 AM
6

I agree with this. Also, stop paying her out of pocket. If she treats you like this, it's obvious she's not your friend.
/r/MensRights25/12/11 06:22 AM
3

Do something morally terrible like attempted murder? Need to atone for your past mistakes, but don't want to take responsibility and blame yourself. Don't worry, it's not your fault, you were born a man and thus predisposed to do evil. Yes Man, the being that is responsible for every evil on the face of the earth, the reason the devil is constantly blushing. They kill, rape, destroy, pull off the heads of kittens and drink their blood. But don't worry, there's a way out from all that guilt, you …
/r/MensRights24/12/11 07:51 AM
0

Even if feminists are lazy, the white knights that service them aren't. If you want something changed, phrase the problem in a "evil men are doing this to innocent women" and the white knights will move heaven and earth to fix the problem. Feminism is likely the most efficient method to actualize political change, unfortunately.
/r/MensRights23/12/11 08:10 PM
2

you have to have balls to be gay
/r/MensRights23/12/11 07:59 PM
6

is that a "i'm not getting punished" mug-shot?
/r/MensRights20/12/11 09:10 AM
1

It must be horrible when your family, who are looking out for your future, find a man for you to marry who can financially support you. For the young men in these conditions, they are unpaid labors for their parents or are kicked out to make a life on their own. Men have it so easy.
/r/MensRights20/12/11 02:18 AM
2

proof that humor is the exaggeration of truth.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 11:23 PM
1

To the women out there. Do women view a relationship with a man as anything other than what they are getting out of it (meals, sexual fulfillment, etc)? The evidence isn't looking good.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 10:22 PM
1

My reply was more directed on you comment about even relationships being something to abandon. Relationships are the foundation of society and I just don't see us social engineering ourselves a replacement without it all falling over.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 09:43 AM
3

tape recorder if you don't live in a 2 party state.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 07:09 AM
1

wow, a society consisting solely of narcissists, that's sure to end well.
/r/MensRights16/12/11 07:02 AM
0

oh wow, another deflection.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 07:02 AM
0

of course my mind is made up, you have yet to address the issue. In the dating world, men pay for women more often then women pay for men and do so by a wide margin. Do you refute that?
/r/MensRights15/12/11 01:11 AM
-1

yes, its hyperbole. You are being petty in calling me out for this while neglecting to argue against my premise, that the vast majority of the time this is how it works out.
/r/MensRights15/12/11 12:53 AM
5

Nice to see how feminists are so oppressed that this is on the top of their agenda.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 10:44 PM
0

And yet, when a woman and man do end up hooking up after meeting at a bar, he took care of her tab 99% of the time. Are you seriously going to deny the social script that exists where men pay for women? It's not done out of obligation but is pressured by what both sexes have be socialized to expect from the other sex.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 10:34 PM
1

Oh look, and SRS poster mocking the idea that men should have "rights"
/r/MensRights14/12/11 10:12 PM
0

I think that they are both seeking transactional sexual relationships, that may not make them the same things but they would be close cousins and worth of comparison. For example, I have yet to have a random woman offer to buy me a drink yet for me approach a woman it is an expectation that I do. This is a transactional relationship.
/r/MensRights14/12/11 09:50 PM
39

The more feminism attacks stable, loving romantic relationships between men and women by increasing the fear of false rape claims, false domestic violence claims, and slavery through child support and robbery through divorce, the more men are going to opt out of those type of relationships. In a world where leagal restiction and social stigma from prostitution were removed, women who are looking for a long term relationship would have to bring something to the table such as love or respect or el…
/r/MensRights11/12/11 09:58 PM
1

Fuck DNA evidence, we have a confession after 4 days of interrogation. That prosecutor should spend 19 years in a dark hole.
/r/MensRights11/12/11 08:21 AM
5

you just described the way things are now. Men are still going to prison for false rape accusations and at rates much higher then false accusations of other crime. But why the fuck would you care, at least the poor women won't have anything to fear. Only men should have to fear the authorities. Go fall on your white knight sword in a fire.
/r/MensRights11/12/11 06:17 AM
5

we don't shame people because of their gender, we shame people because of their actions. voting don't really work for a metaphor for you here. I don't hate women, I hate feminists. These are not the same. I don't hate a gender. I hate people, regardless of gender, who hold an bigoted ideology of preferential treatment of women and seek to influence government to suppress my rights because I am male. You don't seem to be able to come to grips with the fact that this is not a simple man vs. woman …
/r/MensRights11/12/11 12:48 AM
6

It is "register-her" not register him There are many other male only registries proven innocent men have great difficulty/fail to get their names removed off those lists Many innocent men are found guilty by courts that denied them due process The idea of a registry in itself, punishes guilty men that have been rightfully found guilty and served their time. This is cruel and unusual punishment. When you go to each and every one of those registries and inform them about how they are hurting peopl…
/r/MensRights11/12/11 12:20 AM
5

Blaming the Patriarchy is like magic, it doesn't have to make sense.
/r/MensRights09/12/11 07:34 AM
3

if you don't get your side of the story written down somewhere, then when this comes up and gets reviewed it will be seen as "he didn't defend himself, he must be guilty" and good luck then. If you don't what to name the girl in the report, then don't. It's you boss and manager that need to be named, they are the ones threatening you, they are the ones causing you this unnecessary grief in you place of work. At the least I would talk to your HR rep, address your concerns and ask if you need to m…
/r/MensRights05/12/11 06:17 AM
5

File a harassment against your supervisor, manager and the girl with corporate if you have one, with your local HR if you don't. File they they are creating a hostile work environment by threatening to terminate you for doing nothing wrong. They probably won't take you seriously because you have a penis, but insist that a written report of your side of the story is filed. This protects your ass and sends a message that you won't be bullied. I understand that it is much easier for me to give you …
/r/MensRights05/12/11 05:27 AM
7

tell the bigot to fuck off then move on with your life "typical a-hole kind of guy" = most men are a-holes = bigot.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 02:23 AM
1

women, the only people who can be "oppressed" without death, blood, chains, public beatings, forced labor, captivity. men: the only oppressors who: work dangerous jobs to keep the oppressed housed and fed, fight in wars so the oppressed don't have to, buy a diamond then get on one knee to beg the oppressed if he can be her oppressor.
/r/MensRights04/12/11 02:15 AM
11

The MR issue here is that when women seek out a transactional sexual relationship, it is acceptable and empowering, when men do it they are publicly disgraced, fined or put in prison.
/r/MensRights02/12/11 06:34 PM
1

sure, have at it.
/r/MensRights02/12/11 05:26 PM
2

A man who is family oriented has to chose between 3 options Be a traditional man and have the authority in your house tuning a blind eye/being ignorant of the fact that your authority is a house of cards, able to be toppled over at the slightest whim of the woman you are being family oriented with. This all depends on hope that the woman you chose to father children with won't exercise her advantage and take you children away from you, keeping the house and letting you pay for the privilege. The…
/r/MensRights02/12/11 09:53 AM
4

last election, with only a few exceptions, I voted for whoever the league of woman voters weren't supporting.
/r/MensRights29/11/11 10:58 AM
2

when was the last time facts got in the way of an anti-male stereotype.
/r/MensRights29/11/11 10:40 AM
1

you should also add: yes means no regret the day after means no feeling being caught cheating and needing an excuse to not be embarrassed means no having her feelings hurt later means no flunking a class and needing an "I've been raped card" to pass means no having purchased a bottle of wine, then texting you to come over to fuck her, you arrive to her naked on the bed with signs that she drew and hung up saying "fuck me! fuck me! I give consent, do me and don't stop" then from the kitchen walks…
/r/MensRights29/11/11 10:21 AM
7

they also portray men as stupid, until the supporting character reveals his stupidity to him, so he gains a revelation about how he truly feels.
/r/MensRights28/11/11 12:57 AM
5

and mein kampf was just an innocent bedtime story
/r/MensRights27/11/11 08:38 PM
3

pics or it didn't happen.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 08:31 PM
3

Emily Liang studies Biomechanical Engineering at Stanford University in Stanford, CA.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 09:34 AM
4

We are aiming for equality in the value we place on men and women, but not for equality when it means sameness. "Different but equally valued" As for different rights. Legally, I believe that equal protection under the law means just that. If men and women end up being diffrent due to the choices they are free to make by exorcising their rights, then good for them, and no law, or policy should obstruct those paths. Of course, the same equality needs to apply to the accountability to the results …
/r/MensRights27/11/11 07:05 AM
1

This is not just about egalitarianism, it is also about giving a voice to men and their unique perspective and experience. Unfortunately, men are not respected or listened to as a group; and so a dialog to achieve an egalitarian society can not begin until men and their voice will be welcome at the negotiating table.
/r/MensRights27/11/11 06:13 AM
4

Yes, there hasn't been a draft in the past couple generations, that dosn't make this a non issue. Are men supposed to "man up" and stay quiet about their obligation to sign up for the draft until they get called up and shipped over seas to be shot up. The geo-political landscape is never stable and few can predict what will happen a decade from now. Some say there will never be another draft, but there are many who have said "there will never be another _______" until there is. The time to speak…
/r/MensRights27/11/11 05:13 AM
12

A: 0, a feminist would never change a light bulb as a socket is unable to give consent all BIS (bulb in socket) is rape. A feminist will instead quote that 11 out of 10 sockets are raped in their lifetime and blame the patriarchy for propagating a culture where light bulbs are screwed into sockets. She will then take a breath and exclaim "Patriarchy dammit, why is it so dark in here?"
/r/MensRights26/11/11 09:22 PM
3

Time spent with one's children isn't a punishment one should be compensated for. If 50/50 custody then both parties will naturally incur half the costs of child rearing. The idea of more money for less time is backwards. If a parent fights for more time with their child then their equal share, then they should be able to support a more then equal share of the cost. Child support payments should never be needed.
/r/MensRights26/11/11 09:09 PM
0

They day that feminism became the evil we currently revile was the day they abandoned the truth and turned to lies, half truths, hyperbole and feel-good-isms.
/r/MensRights23/11/11 06:21 PM
7

Those damn riots by fatherless young men. Those fathers should Man up and be more of a role model in their child's lives. BTW fathers, don't spend time with your kids. Sincerely, the gubernment. Ps. send money.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 10:10 AM
2

My 2nd girlfriend died of CF a year after our breakup, She didn't look like a man to me.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 10:02 AM
5

You're the one assuming the worst of the father. Grooming and praising a child to denigrate his father and then cheerfully posting it on facebook is not a sign of good parenting. And no, I don't care much about the gender, turning a child against another parent and publicly celebrating it wrong for a mother or a father. In what rational world is this a healthy thing for a parent to be doing.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 09:36 AM
8

there is also the possibility that the father never wanted a child in the first place, but didn't have the same rites to prevent the child coming to term. there is also the possibility that the father wanted to give the kid up for adoption, but again, doesn't possess that right. there is also the possibility that the father wants to be with his kid, but this bitch is preventing it there is also the possibility that the father can't afford the high child support payments the court has ordered him…
/r/MensRights10/11/11 08:08 AM
1

Grace is better than cheap, it's free. And it's as easy to obtain as candy is on Halloween.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 07:40 AM
2

The short answer is yes, yes they can.
/r/MensRights10/11/11 07:37 AM
1

Oh, that's right. Catholics still believe faith and deeds, protestants believe in faith alone. James 2. I had to write a paper on that text my sophomore year for an inductive Bible interpretation class. What I remember is that the word "works" (also translated as deeds) is referring to different things in James than it is when Paul uses the same word. Paul refers to specific Jewish old testament laws while when James refers to non specific works but more to the motivation of the heart of the fai…
/r/MensRights10/11/11 07:26 AM
1

This is not true. Justification through deed was one of the major things renounced during the reformation and Justification through faith has been adopted by the vast majority of churches. Now in practice, however, there are still a lot of "my righteousness is bigger than your righteousness" pissing contests, and here it is much easier to compare deeds than it is to compare faiths. So deeds become important in order to out Christian another, which of course is a big circle-jerk waste of time bec…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 08:03 PM
1

Right, woman are much more interested in the size of you bank statement.
/r/MensRights09/11/11 03:43 AM
1

Barring an global catastrophe, Traditionalism is dead. The idea that the MRA is similar to 1970's feminism has some traction, but I would argue its more of a role we are thrust into rather than what we would like to be in that the current liberal politics grants power to victims. But a return to traditionalism holds no answers. What benefits does traditionalism offer men? Appreciation for the sacrifices that men make, but that's about it, talk about a band-aid. Why is it so dishonorable for me t…
/r/MensRights09/11/11 03:32 AM
24

It must take balls to write this article, the month after everything everywhere is littered with pink ribbons.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 11:28 PM
7

shhhhhhhh. We have a reputation to uphold.
/r/MensRights08/11/11 10:03 AM
6

It wouldn't be about how could we afford food, but rather how could we afford a new 3rd car or plasma flat screen. If it weren't for the exploitation of the underclass of migrant workers, a process the hyper-deflates the cost of food, we would have a better understanding of how far our economy has truly sunk. This exploitation can't be maintained indefinitely and we are due for a major upheaval. I reread the 14th, you were right about that. My mistake.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 07:20 PM
6

So. Is China the only country that is listening to the problems of their male population?
/r/MensRights07/11/11 04:46 AM
13

If we valued men as much as women we could still get people to do the shit jobs, we would just have to compensate them more. If equally valued we would conscript both sexes for defense when necessary. Really, if the 14th amendment was enforced as gender neutral as it was written a lot of this should already be happening where the only thing standing in the way is white knight culture.
/r/MensRights07/11/11 04:15 AM
3

your mother was an idiot
/r/MensRights06/11/11 07:14 AM
2

My uncle was a senior VP of a large insurance company and he once said that men start out as worse drivers but improve with experience, women aren't much better than the day they started driving.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 09:19 AM
0

If the phallic photos protect the posters from the plethora of pervasive feminist prattling, then perhaps the penis pictures processes some positive purpose. But I doubt it.
/r/MensRights04/11/11 08:48 AM
5

So you distrust a specialist because he only knows one thing, but would rather trust a general practitioner because he sees the big picture.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 10:45 PM
2

so my freedoms extend up to the point where if influences a woman's feelings. But if how she dresses influence how I feel, its her freedom to do what she wants and I should man up and not have feelings. Is that about right?
/r/MensRights01/11/11 08:03 PM
-2

And we have our double standard! Everyone take a drink.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 07:17 PM
3

so what about taking away the man's freedom to publicly shame women who dress provocatively? Or does that freedom not count?
/r/MensRights01/11/11 07:14 PM
-2

So the US has the highest rate of std's and teen pregnancy than other developed countries and this is because of the pornographic style advertising in media. Except the US has some of the strictest censorship in regards to sex in the media. I think she missed something.
/r/MensRights01/11/11 03:09 AM
3

Relationships are built on love, respect and trust and people who love respect and trust each other don't threaten to call the cops, call the cops, file restraining orders on each other. She doesn't love you and she doesn't care if her actions cause you harm. It may be harsh but it is reality and until you can see that, we can't help you.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 09:09 PM
12

As soon as a woman even threatens to call the cops the relationship is over.
/r/MensRights28/10/11 08:36 PM
10

Me too. The whole point of this redit and this movement in to open peoples eyes so they can change their ways. Hooray to us for a mission accomplished. Hooray to her for being open minded.
/r/MensRights24/10/11 04:29 AM
2

for corrupt officials, by corrupt officials.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 07:44 AM
2

This sounds like you are telling him to "man up" Take abuse, don't complain and move along. You're right in that he won't get a job at this buisness and should continue to look elsewhere but there is no reason he should have to take this laying down.
/r/MensRights23/10/11 07:41 AM
2

Maybe, that would be a question for a lawyer.
/r/MensRights22/10/11 06:13 PM
4

at places like hooters they are "entertainers that serve" and they get around it that way. To the OP. You can sue them, though some form of proof is needed beyond your girlfriend's word. If you can find some other men that applied and were turned down that would help. Also, file a complaint with the Better Business Bureau and if it's a chain, file a complaint with their corporate HQ. While your individual complaint may not be of much note, but those complaints do add up.
/r/MensRights22/10/11 05:18 PM
3

News Flash! 6/4/1942 Americans launch horrific attack on innocent Japanese fleet off Midway Island!!! Damn those oppressive Yanks.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 10:47 PM
1

I think she is the very ape she is describing. She loves her husband, but attacks all other males, assuming them to be evil and not letting them near her children and then making sure than no man can be near anyone's children.
/r/MensRights21/10/11 10:34 PM
1

She's also scared to be left alone with men http://www.chicagonow.com/high-gloss-and-sauce/2011/09/how-to-be-married-dont-have-other-dudes-over/
/r/MensRights21/10/11 07:18 PM
7

It took 5 long pages to say: Me, me, me, I want, I want, I want. Hey, look at this, men aren't willing/able to provide me with what I want. How about we shove them over here and brainstorm ways us girls can work together to give us what we want. What about the men? Oh who the fuck cares, pay attention to me.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 10:16 AM
0

Soooooo the mothers who's children are being taken away from them are more of a victim then the male children who are being taken away to be shot at. Oh, I forgot, women are always the hardest hit by war. The fact that feminists are going to underdeveloped countries with the intent to improve only the lives of women is proof that women in those countries are higher valued/protected.
/r/MensRights16/10/11 04:34 AM
3

maybe men just aren't attracted to women that don't respect men of lesser intellect.
/r/MensRights15/10/11 03:01 AM
73

This is a great idea, and in this spirit, I have some others. Too few men in college? let's pay them to go. Where did all the good men go? How about we pay them to go out with you. Rape culture? Lets pay men not to rape. Domestic violence? Just pay the man. Men experiencing too many work place injuries and deaths? Don't pay them to go to work, pay them not to go to work silly.
/r/MensRights12/10/11 02:52 AM
8

"what is it men really want? To be loved without expectation. To mess up without being judged. To feel emotions at their own pace. And to be allowed the simple privilege of honest talk." Her response "uninterested." apparently us men are asking too much.
/r/MensRights10/10/11 05:21 AM
-1

We don't blame an entire gender for our problems. We recognize that traditional gender roles, while necessary at the time, were restrictive to both men and women, hence men recognizes their role in creating the problems it's trying to fix. Feminism opposes us. Even if #1 doesn't prevent us form becoming what we detest, we have an opposing force working against us. If we ever go to far, we will be pushed back. Though I would rather it not to be an endless war between the genders, as long as the w…
/r/MensRights10/10/11 02:38 AM
1

"Strategic Bachelor Reserve" or prison. I've heard it both ways.
/r/MensRights10/10/11 02:18 AM
2

this study will never get funding.
/r/MensRights22/09/11 05:02 AM
0

Good Call, he'll make a great mod. Congratulations Good luck & I don't envy you for the AMR stalker shit storm that I fear will follow you.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 04:29 AM
7

So a 12 year old can give consent, but a drunk college girl cannot.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 04:24 AM
6

to them, men=animal so it's not a surprise.
/r/MensRights19/09/11 04:18 AM
9

"to raise awareness of veganism through a mix of pornography and graphic footage of animal suffering." so beastiality snuff films?
/r/MensRights19/09/11 04:15 AM
4

ohnos! someone edited the list. =]
/r/MensRights17/09/11 10:59 PM
6

they were emasculated because they were taking care of their kids? As in taking care of kids is woman's work? I don't see anything wrong, this is how parents act. Sometimes parents like to have conversations with grownups and get annoyed at the constant demand of attention.
/r/MensRights17/09/11 07:10 AM
1

while I am against circumcision, there are literally tens of thousands of castrations performed on animals every year w/o anesthetic.
/r/MensRights15/09/11 06:04 PM
5

Christian. Lutheran to be specific.
/r/MensRights13/09/11 05:14 AM
2

Here's the promo I saw. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=751OX-RpINU
/r/MensRights12/09/11 04:31 AM
2

I've seen a couple promos for that show during the football games today and tell me that's not Jessica Vaenti! I mean, not actually her but like someone based sitcom off of her. What that character says, the mannerisms, the voice, the look. I bet I'm not far off either, though I'm not going to watch to find out.
/r/MensRights12/09/11 04:22 AM
1

technically that would be "men and woman"
/r/MensRights09/09/11 05:53 PM
1

Not I, I may agree to a ceremony in front of family, friends and God and make a commitment of devotion or something, but I would never get the state involved unless laws and policy drastically changes.
/r/MensRights09/09/11 05:20 PM
1

this
/r/MensRights07/09/11 01:13 AM
2

I work with teens My direct superior once requested that I spend extra time with a particular girl due to some family hardships. She has a close friend so I end up spending extra time with both of them. The parent of the friend sees me talking to them as she picks them up for a few days in a row and they give me hugs as they leave(being well trained not to initiate a hug myself). Obviously I am trying to molest them so the parent, after spreading gossip about my inappropriate behavior confronts …
/r/MensRights06/09/11 10:51 PM
9

By telling boys that all they want are one thing, doing so may actually encourage them to devalue other aspects of their life and relationships furthering their servitude to the all powerful pussy.
/r/MensRights26/08/11 06:51 PM
2

men = elephants. Nice that they don't allow comments.
/r/MensRights24/08/11 04:56 AM
10

No, the best way to protect your own rights is to oppose those who try to quash them.
/r/MensRights23/08/11 03:09 AM
2

Top left corner of sign is the word "men" in shadow print. How dare women have to tolerate the presence of men in the workplace.
/r/MensRights19/08/11 04:22 AM
0

bad law or the trail was unfair. If the accused was not allowed to face his accuser or question the witness, those are gross infringements on the accused's rights and I would vote not guilty even if there were video tape evidence.
/r/MensRights17/08/11 04:36 PM
3

That person also thought that Jar jar, ewoks, Howard the duck and the Star wars holiday special were good ideas.
/r/MensRights14/08/11 03:39 AM
-4

Pointing out that feminists have no sense of humor is like pointing out that water is not dry.
/r/MensRights13/08/11 12:03 AM
90

and the news is showing the vid? if it was a girl they wouldn't even be allowed to tell us the kids name. I think that makes this a triple standard.
/r/MensRights09/08/11 04:28 AM
1

You're close, but if you read the article it shifts the responsibility from the individual women getting into marriage for the wrong reason to society not teaching girls to not get married for the wrong reason.
/r/MensRights08/08/11 05:18 AM
14

Oh No's! Those poor women who enter a commitment knowing they likely aren't going to honor it and aren't "empowered" enough to get out before saying "I do", how can we help THEM. If this happened with any other form of contract there would be a word used for it, fraud.
/r/MensRights07/08/11 09:33 PM
6

You can not equate society and "The Patriarchy" for one simple reason, and that is the label of "Patriarchy" excuses the roll of women in the creation and its sustainment of traditional gender stereotypes while also implying that these stereotypes are always a detriment to women and benefit for men.
/r/MensRights15/07/11 10:53 PM
4

I think labeling a man creepy is more comparative to labeling a woman ugly as both are making a judgment of a persons worth on a first impression.
/r/MensRights09/07/11 07:55 PM
2

your ability to refute your own straw-man augments is impressive.
/r/MensRights03/07/11 05:18 AM
16

Where are the 30% coal miners, trash collector, front line soldiers? Fucking quotas.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 11:12 PM
17

Because there are 5000 easier ways for a woman to be left alone with a child then finding one on the internet.
/r/MensRights30/06/11 05:48 PM
4

Holy Shit! Is this how peace in the middle east comes about?
/r/MensRights27/06/11 07:09 AM
50

Because they are men. It's not like they're people or cute animals or anything. I don't understand the question.
/r/MensRights27/06/11 01:23 AM
1

If Hitler had discovered the cure for cancer I am not going to refuse treatment simply because it was discovered by Hitler. I would choose to use the treatment, and I would continue to curse and abhor Hitler.
/r/MensRights26/06/11 03:04 AM
5

The article is a year old, so it's not like this just happened. I wonder if he made a last statement.
/r/MensRights25/06/11 07:19 PM
17

Porn Pay Gap: Women porn stars make more than their male counterparts, this is unequal pay for equal work. Quick, someone get the government involved and pass legislation to make porn producers undergo a sensitivity training regime to heal this injustice.
/r/MensRights24/06/11 01:08 AM
5

I understand your concern, but this is the natural course of political moments as unfortunate as it is. Just like feminism, the MRM will continue to grow until the legitimate inequities of the system are corrected. After that the MRM will still exist and will start looking for minor, perceived or even imagined injustice just like all political movements do after accomplishing what the were created to do, and that is unfortunate. However, it is still necessary. It is necessary because the real in…
/r/MensRights20/06/11 08:36 PM
6

To be loved, respected and valued for who I am, not just what I am able to do/provide for her. Sense of "fair play": Just because one has an advantage doesn't mean it is fair to use said advantage. In the legal system, the deck is stacked against men and I would not pursue a relationship with a woman w/o a sense of fair play for fear of her wielding her advantage against me in a court of law. Loyalty, Trust and commitment: They say that men are afraid of commitment, and when half of all marriage…
/r/MensRights20/06/11 09:46 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter