TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GCanuck Archive

View 0 posts and 72 comments by GCanuck on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
21

Last line in the article: Griffin's filings also allege that Dias Griffin is worth $50 million, and can easily cover for her own monthly expenses. Keyword: Allege. But even if she's worth 1% of that, it's still enough to raise some kids.
/r/MensRights24/02/15 09:27 PM
-1

Consider: A horrible racist is on trail for killing a black man. He's been convicted before, is an active member of the KKK, and is wearing an "I like to kill niggers" t-shirt. There's evidence that this racist prick and the victim met and exchanged heated words. Perhaps even a few shoves in the bar kind of thing. Racist gets kicked out of bar and a witness sees him hiding in the shadows of the bar parking lot. Victim leaves bar alone and is found dead in the parking lot. In a court of law, the …
/r/MensRights27/08/14 08:25 PM
10

Screen shot so I don't give Cracked a page hit?
/r/MensRights03/06/14 04:09 PM
22

Apples and oranges, friend. This OP has nothing to do with gender, it's about the deaf community and their notion that being deaf isn't a disadvantage, but a culture. (FTR: I think that's horse poop, but that's not the point here.) Your example is about deliberate harm. This is about deaf people using eugenics to attempt to conceive a deaf child. Shitty, but morally grey and certainly not a MR issue.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 09:38 PM
2

This post right here is a good example of why people think the MRM is a bunch of whiny crybabies. The dude was arrested because he didn't have the proper permits for the stun gun. In searching Grant’s semi-truck, police found a black stun gun. He was then taken into custody. ... Stun guns are illegal in Wisconsin without a conceal and carry permit. The man did not have a conceal and carry permit in any state. OP, stop editorializing titles.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 04:26 PM
2

"in all of us command" Shouldn't it be "in all of our commands"?? I DNRTFA so perhaps this is a typo. Either way, I agree... This is a non-issue, and one I actually support. This is troll bait plain and simple.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 05:46 PM
22

So let me get this straight... In a dark secluded area you yelled a request at a strange woman, she responded defensively, then you hurled some insults at her and are somehow confused and offended when she sought an official assistance? How naive are you? This sounds like the women didn't understand you, and you retaliated in the most juvenile way possible. What the fuck? The fuck is this... You sound like a fucking tool. Stop being a tool and perhaps people will treat you better. You may now do…
/r/MensRights05/07/13 02:42 PM
1

We should be ethical for the sake of our own integrity, not to appease some third party. I completely agree. However, if you think that appearances don't matter, then you should be reminded of the phrase "wishful thinking". Do you really think this movement will gain critical mass if people only see emotional knee-jerk reactions from us?
/r/MensRights25/06/13 11:46 AM
1

Don't you want to present a good, above reproach, and logical image of this movement to the world?
/r/MensRights24/06/13 07:40 PM
0

People like you are simply bigots lol... Are you really pulling the "you don't agree with me, you're a bigot" bullshit? Really? I thought this was one of the methods radfems used that MRAs were staunchly against? Men, watch what you say, watch what you do! This is good advice for anyone, but the author was specifically addressing men who ignored communication (spoken and unspoken) when attempting to meet new women. Sure, it could be gender neutral, but that's not the author's purpose. They have …
/r/MensRights24/06/13 07:29 PM
-1

Wow did you miss the point of that. I'm certainly not denying that this author reads like they have a significant sized chip on their shoulder, but the lesson here isn't "don't introduce yourself to strangers", it's "read the body language (and direct messages) and respond appropriately". This: In which merely introducing yourself enforces rape culture and demeans women all over editorializing bullshit, is why people think MRAs are petty, childish, and knee-jerk reactionists. If there's one thin…
/r/MensRights24/06/13 05:37 PM
4

No, that's too close to removing consent after the fact. And let's not get bogged down in nuances here. The title of this post is misleading and misrepresents the details of the article. That's what I'm saying.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 08:32 PM
0

If you're having sex with a girl, and she says "don't cum inside me", yet you do, then ya... Rape. (Although, this is an example of how we should have different levels of rape, just like murder.) I don't see what's hard about this concept to understand. A person cannot willfully ignore another person's sexual limits. Edit: Highlighted a word for you. Y'all seem to be missing it when you read my comment.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 07:43 PM
-10

NOW we have a case where a man donates sperm to help lesbians have a baby. Sure they could have gone through some agency and then spent $3000 for each attempt to basically do what any idiot and a turkey baster can do at home. So, what's to stop any deadbeat father from using that as an excuse? "She just hired me to give her sperm yer honour!" It's unprovable either way. Remember... Courts and our current justice system are not about fairness or equality. It's about what you can prove. If you can…
/r/MensRights11/06/13 08:36 PM
-6

sigh Since this comes up every so often, let's just put a hold on the circle jerk. This man did not donate his sperm through an accredited source. The article doesn't go into the details on "how" it was done, but it sounds like he jerked it into a cup and handed it over to the girls. Then when the girls separated, and one went to the state for support, the state said, 'your sperm, your responsibility'. As it should be. The state has no way of confirming nor denying that this was nothing more tha…
/r/MensRights11/06/13 08:01 PM
1

Why in the world would you ever be in a relationship with someone who has a problem with you going out with the guys? Do couples really do this? I thought that was just in sitcoms. FTR: I've been to male only functions, I've also been on girls night out (they talk a lot about sex and bodily functions, just like men btw). I've never had a relationship with anyone who had a problem with either. And if I ever did, it would be a short relationship.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 08:19 PM
1

This movement will not survive off fiction. People already believe that this movement is full of deluded men who see oppression and persecution where there is none. And now you want to advocate using fiction as a talking point?? If there is a real story, factually confirmed and reported by a legitimate news source, I'd upvote it and discuss it. But fiction has no place in a social change movement. "No reals, only feels" is the mantra of our opposition, not us.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 07:27 PM
1

it's not a very credible source. Which is just as bad, likely worse, than parody or satire. This movement simply has too much bad press for us to risk bad data. Remember, it's easier to tear down than to build up. (Not that I'm speaking directly to you /u/overtmind, just sayin' is all.)
/r/MensRights05/06/13 07:10 PM
4

Find me a legit news story about this and I'll apologise to the community.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 06:56 PM
1

Check the site. Here's an example: http://www.thesaid.net/news/ultrasound-or-ultra-inappropriate/
/r/MensRights05/06/13 06:50 PM
-2

Flags are good, but too often people in this sub want to trust their knee-jerk reactions rather doing their due diligence and investigating the source for themselves. And for this particular article, that would've taken a whole 30 seconds of investigation. No excuses. This movement needs to be more critical of everything. We simply can't afford to be caught with our pants down.
/r/MensRights05/06/13 06:40 PM
-8

I swear to christ you dumb fucks are getting dumber and dumber. THIS IS PARODY!! I don't give a shit if you think "it happens everyday"... Upvoting parody lessens the movement and everyone who did should be ashamed of themselves. Goddamn, this is not helping. Facts and truth. These are the only things this sub should be commenting on. Leave the "feelings" for others. We won't make an inch of progress on "feelings". And you people wonder why others consider those in this movement to be overly sen…
/r/MensRights05/06/13 05:02 PM
3

Ya, mods... do that. I hate the seemingly perpetual whining that goes on here about double standards and women behaving badly. They do nothing for the MRM as a whole, and only exacerbate the frustration many of us already experience. I'd rather this sub be about activism, rather than a bitch session. But I also get that many users want those stories for whatever reason and we're simply too small to break up the sub into activism and rants. This elegant solution solves most of the issues.
/r/MensRights23/05/13 02:53 PM
14

Why are you all upset? This is fucking great! Couldn't be happier. Why you ask? Because this is just another way to highlight to the populace how stupid this all is. Overload the system. Every official complaint will have to have someone look at it. So... Overload the system. It doesn't matter if you're laughed at or ridiculed, overload the system. Write complaints about anyone who looks at you, talks to you, brushes by you in the halls. Fill this bullshit system with so much bullshit, the local…
/r/MensRights16/05/13 08:14 PM
-1

I understand the point of discussion, but since that wasn't highlighted in the article, it really comes across as projecting our own insecurities into situations where there is no reason to be insecure. And one thing I think the MRM should be actively and intently aware of is coming across in a similar manner as we see many radfems who see sexism where there is none. The MRM should be progressed with real and concrete evidence, not shadows of a thought. Still, I questioned and downvoted (sub, no…
/r/MensRights15/05/13 05:31 PM
0

men who would oppose this are oppressing women by dictating what they can and cannot do. men who go along with it are sexist pigs who can't do anything but take advantage of girl's "assets" Since this point wasn't in the article, then he's projecting some aggression onto it. Perhaps "angry" wasn't the right word, but he's definitely projecting.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 05:23 PM
0

I think you're looking for something to be angry about. I do not recall that implication being stated in the article. I did skim it though, it's entirely possible I missed it.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 04:50 PM
1

So? Why wouldn't someone use their assets for personal gain? How is the a MR issue?
/r/MensRights15/05/13 01:10 PM
20

Sweet jesus you fuckers are getting dumber and dumber. This is a troll post. There is no fucking way a lawyer wrote up a pre-nup that removed responsibility of child support. Once you're married, that kid becomes your responsibility. Good god people. Pull your collective heads outta your asses.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 12:17 PM
-3

This is a collection of memes. Nothing more. There is nothing here for MR or men in general. Consider if someone posted a GGG, or liberal hippy meme book. Same thing.
/r/MensRights13/05/13 05:18 PM
-4

I would not put it past them trying it at some point in the US. I would. Not gonna happen in our life time. Not in western society. Because the single man's counter point would be to re-work the divorce laws. Simpler, easier, and cheaper. It's a carrot and stick question. And western philosophy currently greatly favours the carrot over the stick. The reason why it would work in a place like Japan is they have a more concise idea of their own culture. Western society doesn't have any particular c…
/r/MensRights02/05/13 06:08 PM
-7

They are waging a shaming campaign against young men telling them to "grow up" and work hard so they can marry women and support them. So? Do you think that's going to be affective? I don't. They are instituting far more insane common-law marriage laws. I'm pretty sure in Canada if you live together with a woman for 2 years, you are considered married. Surprise! Many common-law laws make sense when you get down to it. And they are fairly gender neutral as far as I can tell (perhaps not ruled in …
/r/MensRights02/05/13 05:29 PM
3

going to increase their efforts to strongarm men into marriage. How the fuck are they going to force anyone to marry? Get over yourself and stop with the fear mongering. Facts only please. "No reals, only feels" is the mantra of our enemy, not us. Be better than that.
/r/MensRights02/05/13 04:48 PM
6

I'm shocked it's still so low. Also, OP... The last part of this submissions title makes zero sense. Exactly what were you trying to convey here? That women are going to war to make men marry them?
/r/MensRights02/05/13 03:00 PM
0

Fair enough... I'm just sayin'... Tumbler is the short bus of the internet. It shouldn't be given equal consideration.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 01:09 PM
-1

Protip: Assume Poe's Law when visiting Tumbler unless you have concrete evidence that it's legit. With subs like TiA and the various circle jerks going on, bullshit sites like Tumbler simply shouldn't be given any serious consideration (with regards to gender issues).
/r/MensRights26/04/13 12:56 PM
-1

Stop editorializing titles.
/r/MensRights19/04/13 03:54 PM
10

Holy shit.... For a movement that totes itself as progressive, sure are an awful lot of sexually repressed individuals in here. There is nothing "creepy" about this, and if you truly find it so, I urge you to examine your feelings and ask yourself 'how' and 'why' this is so creepy to you. This is a mother teaching her child about her body. Yes, a gender swap would likely raise the same comments from others, that doesn't mean it's right to do so now.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 04:57 PM
1

I invite you to take a look at the phrase: "Mountain out of a molehill." Also, "manipulation of the masses".... Dude it's almost astonishing how naive and deluded you are if you think Reddit has one iota of relevancy outside of the online community. But good luck in your crusade. P.S. Extra credit: Examine the phrase "tilting at windmills".
/r/MensRights04/04/13 03:18 PM
2

Dude, you have followed the rabbit too far down the hole. This shit is meaningless in the big picture. Pick your battles and fight those you can win. And seriously, SRS is irrelevant. The very concept of giving them even the tiniest bit of relevance is maddening. Stop it.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 02:51 PM
1

Actually from what I have been reading this could very well have just as much to do with /r/mensrights. Explain yourself. Because all I'm seeing is some folks closing themselves off from reality and falling into irrelevancy. I'm all for them continuing to do this shit. Remember: Nothing of value was ever accomplished in an echo chamber. Let them lock themselves away in their own little world if it makes them happy. The users of that subReddit do not matter in the real world. if I just turn a bli…
/r/MensRights04/04/13 02:31 PM
7

this is not acceptable. Yes it is. Their playground, their rules. The following revelation may shock you, but www.reddit.com/r/feminism is not the end all and be all of feminism. It's one facet run by random internet folk. I would like to make contact with whoever deals with these issues and advice into how to have the offending parties removed. Stop sweating the small stuff. It's their circle, let them jerk it.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 02:05 PM
1

But because the couple used a syringe and did not go through a medical facility, Mr. Marotta has now ended up having to pay child support for the baby conceived through this method. Why? Because he did not go through a medical facility. Downvote this fucking flame bait.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 05:16 PM
55

Men don't just WANT sex, they NEED sex. Sure, but so do women. Ever talk to a woman who hasn't had an orgasm in a while? Just as crabby as a man who hasn't. Professional sex workers call it 'release' for a reason. Immediately after sex, a physiological reaction causes men become emotionally detached from their partner. I'm not an expert to discuss the biological, physiological, or psychological affects of sex and men. But I will say this... I'm usually hot and tired after sex. A time I usually e…
/r/MensRights12/03/13 03:23 PM
1

Details brother... You're missing the details. (And no, I'm not searching. This is your party, you bring the snacks.)
/r/MensRights07/03/13 09:32 PM
5

Hey OP... You the author? If so, constructive criticism: Show a better differential between Ms Koss' quotes and your dialogue. The lack of italics or indentations makes it difficult to determine which parts of the text are hers, and which parts are yours. If you're not the author, then forget everything I've just written.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 08:49 PM
3

Cool, as long as they can bathe themselves. But if they can cook and clean, I suppose they could bathe themselves too.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 08:30 PM
23

There's something the author missed. Sexbots can be for women too. I'd argue that a sexbot with a penis is easier to make than one with a self-lubricating, self-cleaning vagina (no sex bot will succeed on any real level until it's self cleaning). I think both men and women will benefit from sexbots. We'd all get our own personal robot servant/masturbation device. Plus, any baby making would be done above board and with full disclosure to both parties. No side will have an advantage here. Sure, t…
/r/MensRights16/01/13 08:05 PM
0

I have yet to see a post bashing women in general. Check the title of this post. Then read the story. This 'story' has been spun to create a mistrust between men and women. If you can't see the blatant misogyny in this post, well friend... I suggest you do some deep soul searching. but do you really feel that people on this subreddit have a natural tendency to dislike ALL women all the time? There's certainly seems to be a hell of a lot more of this crap getting upvoted recently.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 06:26 PM
2

Doesn't matter. I didn't come to this sub to read anecdotal stories that are unverifiable at best, and unbelievable at worst. This is simply more misogynist bullshit and the subscribers here are eating it up. I came here to read about actual injustices systematically forced upon the male gender, not some bullshit story about a sucker getting played. This shit is simple women bashing disguised as some evidence that women are out to get men. Which is bullshit. People are always going to be asshole…
/r/MensRights04/01/13 05:58 PM
5

Meh... It's just the final nail in the coffin for this subReddit for me. This sub has gone downhill since we're now just bitching about women in general and upvoting these obvious troll posts.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 03:39 PM
-9

1/10 You'll get someone to believe it, but this is obvious bullshit. On the off chance that you're serious (or to those who think they'd react similarly)... Grow a fucking back bone.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 02:27 PM
-1

Ginsburg, The Guardian, you're IDIOTS. That's pretty much a picture perfect representation of 'hating' my friend. And it's comments like these that make others dismiss the movement as a bunch of knuckle dragging misogynists. We have to be better than this. We just have to be.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 07:18 PM
-1

Don't be silly. This is MR. Where emotion and knee-jerk reactions run rampant. And seriously guys... Upvoting Noel's comment just proves the haters right. Stop it. Be better than your enemies. It's the only way to win these battles.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 06:42 PM
2

My dictionary doesn't have the word 'movies' as a recognizable word. Shit ain't perfect kid.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 05:54 PM
42

As they say... Where's the beef? Show some evidence of this claim. Edit: I did a little investigation... 6/8 (75%) on /top are about women getting their comeuppance. I think you're full of shit OP. Edit2: If OP meant YouTube, OP should've said YouTube. That is all. (FTR: The ones I checked (admittedly not many) worked fine.)
/r/MensRights11/12/12 07:44 PM
1

Make a new account, post one similar in a few days with the genders reversed. I bet you $100, to the charity of your choice, that the response will be very similar. Shake? tl;dr - OP (in the X-Post) is a douche and the responses were valid. Quit trying to pick fights... We've got enough actual battles to keep us busy for a while.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 03:18 PM
12

The big no-no's are hyper-masculine outfits like skull-print shirts and cargo pants. Cargo pants? Really?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 05:44 PM
-2

Then source those. This is not such an example. Edit: This happens to fathers all the time who never agreed to pay for post-secondary education. And spare me the hyperbole.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 08:26 PM
2

The obligation to pay for post-secondary should never exist and it needs to be publicized and protested. This will be the last time I write this, so do try to pay attention this time.... THIS MAN IS NOT OBLIGATED TO PAY FOR HIS OFFSPRING'S POST-SECONDARY EDUCATION... HE AGREED TO IT AS PART OF HIS DIVORCE/CHILD PAYMENT SETTLEMENTS. I can understand why people are missing this point. It was the last few lines of the article. Perhaps people aren't reading the entire article? Here, I'll do you a fa…
/r/MensRights22/11/12 08:04 PM
1

What people are missing here is that he's already agreed to the terms previously. Unless the terms stipulated that his children had to be kind and loving, there's zero reason to change the already existing agreement. I do not think this particular case is a good example of family courts discriminating against men. It's an example of a family court upholding an already agreed upon contract. because being forced to pay for an adult's post secondary education is complete nonsense. I couldn't agree …
/r/MensRights22/11/12 07:24 PM
-3

GTFO Um, no. How does 'no' work out for you? this is about a man trying to change a child support position While I'm all for the concept of renegotiations, this man attempted a renegotiation and failed. It is most certainly not a MR issue. Why do people like you even come in here? Describe "people like me".
/r/MensRights22/11/12 06:52 PM
0

The man was ordered to continue paying the same child support and post-secondary costs agreed to in 2009 Was thinking the same until I read that. This is a story of someone trying to change an agreement, not a MR issue.
/r/MensRights22/11/12 04:32 PM
6

Text version
/r/MensRights12/11/12 01:47 PM
4

Sorry, but having a child is not a right Yes it is. I think what you're attempting to convey is that having a child is not mandatory. Just sayin'.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 02:41 PM
5

never seen any sort of 'hate' towards any sort of person. To be fair there is a ton of "that's feminism for you", or "what else would you expect from a woman" comments that get upvoted. Now, you and I both know that these are comments born of frustration... But from an outside perspective they could easily be construed as "hate". Disclaimer: I do not think that this particular MR community is full of hatred or bigotry, but every community is going to have jerks.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 09:27 PM
7

Check out the laws for 'common law' in your region. As far as I'm aware, the courts see very little difference between common law and married. Taking this path actually leads to greater complications, not fewer.
/r/MensRights24/10/12 07:36 PM
1

All deleted... Got a cache?
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:51 PM
167

First panel: Worker 1: "Gosh Jim. You're getting pretty thick around the middle. Time to cut back on the sweets, eh you tubby bastard?" Worker 2 (Jim): "Haha. Ya, I'm definitely getting older. What are you going to do?.... Asshole. :P Second Panel: Worker 1: "Gosh Sally. Whose couch did you kill to make that dress?" Worker 2 (Sally): "HR! HR! HR! Help me! I'm being oppressed!" Something like that, I imagine.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 05:47 PM
3

For your pleasure Please do not go there and be jerks. Unless you're going to call me out on my jerk-ness. I can take it, I won't speak for others who posted.
/r/MensRights26/04/12 06:28 PM
1

Um, not a parent, nor do I plan on being one, but isn't a side effect of play dates an opportunity for the visiting parent to have a little time off? (i.e. kinda like a time share babysitting?)
/r/MensRights19/04/12 03:59 PM
2

Link to the prison/rape waiver please. Google isn't finding anything. Edit: Here it is
/r/MensRights12/04/12 08:08 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter