TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GeheimerAccount Archive

View 5 posts and 243 comments by GeheimerAccount on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

why is it a mensrights issue if there arent any double standarts against men?
/r/MensRights17/04/23 06:50 PM
0

the difference is what they are doing is legal. but youre missing my point, again, I'm not saying what they are doing is ok. its just not a mensrights issue.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 06:27 PM
-2

the tinder swindler didnt just use girls for free food or anything though, they literally scammed them out of everything they had. thats called a crime. if a women did what the tinder swindler did, nobody would find that ok either. and again, I'm not saying what they are doing in the subreddit is "ok", its just not a mensrights issue.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 06:18 PM
-4

with "they dont have any double standarts" I meant the people in the subreddit, not people in general. (At least they dont have to just because they are in it) Also as I said, it is an asshole move. It just isnt a mensrights problem, since they arent against men, they just want to have profit for themselves.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 04:44 PM
-18

I know I'm gonna get downvoted for this, but I dont really see a big problem with this... Sure its maybe what you would call an "asshole move", but they dont have any double standards, they just want to maximize profit for themselves.
/r/MensRights17/04/23 03:48 PM
1

I mean he's 10, not everything he says automatically had a political agenda behind it. If that was the only car you noticed it I wouldn't worry about it.
/r/MensRights05/04/23 11:33 PM
1

I mean your not in jail yet, so why would you risk it?
/r/MensRights29/03/23 04:56 AM
-6

this sounds very made up
/r/MensRights28/03/23 11:27 PM
19

I still dont understand how that makes you pro life? As far as I understood it you arent pro life, but you are also for men having more rights when it comes to child support. being pro life doesnt fix child support at all. so being pro life means standing for something very different.
/r/MensRights23/03/23 01:03 AM
7

this isnt a safe space
/r/MensRights22/03/23 09:18 PM
1

yes but as I said, everybody already knows that.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 07:50 PM
1

I'm glad that youre happy, but this sub i not really about trans.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 06:38 AM
2

can you back that up?
/r/MensRights21/03/23 06:37 AM
0

I'm none of those (1.76m, 4 or 5/10 and still studying physics) but I still get along. I think other than just hormones of course, being depressed has lot more to do with philosophy and meaning than whether its actually "unfair" or not.
/r/MensRights21/03/23 02:15 AM
0

why should you be depressed? what does the word fair even mean? compared to children in africa we are pretty lucky... I just live with what I have... Of course I will try to make it even better if thats possible. but from a purely rational standpoint, I dont see why you should become depressed. (I know that depression isnt rational, I'm just saying that life being unfair isnt a good reason)
/r/MensRights21/03/23 02:13 AM
1

we are already at crackedplugins3 and that existed for a couple of months already... of course thats just an anectode, but I'd say its at least worth a try
/r/MensRights21/03/23 12:20 AM
10

Mensrights2?
/r/MensRights20/03/23 08:55 AM
1

what does that have to do with stoicism?
/r/MensRights19/03/23 02:57 PM
1

no, but it makes it the status quo and you need a strong counter point if you want to convince anyone of the opposite.
/r/MensRights19/03/23 02:57 PM
1

You have the right... but it's still not good advice
/r/MensRights18/03/23 09:01 PM
-8

that will only make the situation worse... How about he respects her opinion first, before demanding that she accepts his? I think its disrespectful to immediately assume others opinions are false, even though you say yourself that you dont have enough insight to judge.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 08:53 PM
0

I'm sure that will help the situation a lot
/r/MensRights18/03/23 08:48 PM
1

I really disagree, this is a very good example for why pop stoicism isnt applicable to everything. His realationship to his sister is NOT out of his control. It's absolutely contstructive to think about how to manage the situation better.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 08:46 PM
1

It's just in the way you communicate it... Instead of: I dont belive any rape victim until I have decisive proof Say: I dont know enough about this to judge, but if it happened its not ok of course It's the same thing, just the second one is a lot more respectful. I dont think you should believe all victims, but that doesnt mean you should assume its staged.
/r/MensRights18/03/23 08:44 PM
1

when I used the word "radical" I was talking about my opinion and not that I would become a vandalist
/r/MensRights18/03/23 04:39 PM
-5

its mostly because men tend to do more risky stuff, like working in hazardous occupations, smoking, excessive alcohol consumption and drug use, and they also are less likely to seek medical care... In some way thats because they are men and have different hormones of course, but I'm not sure thats what they mean by "biological issues".
/r/MensRights18/03/23 06:10 AM
1

what does the word "feminist" even mean? If its the "original" meaning when feminism started, I'd be a feminist too... I'd even be a pretty radical feminist by that messure.
/r/MensRights17/03/23 10:53 PM
2

I know most people here dont agree, but I think the rule makes sense... just bitching about things doesnt to anything. people in this sub already know that most other subs have a bias against men. adressing specific problems and most importantls possible solutions is way more important
/r/MensRights17/03/23 03:46 PM
1

explain how they do what? you dont need to o a lot of research to find out that the genderpaygap exists... or what do you mean?
/r/MensRights17/03/23 03:19 PM
20

ok you win
/r/MensRights16/03/23 06:18 PM
6

That ChatGPT is biased against women is already pretty well known by that "make a joke about women/men" meme I think. But I have to say in your case the questions might be a bit to cherrypicked towards common biases against men. Maybe you should have also included questions like X are more creative than Y X deserve more love X can better adapt to situations than Y X are on average more interesting than Y I havent tried them, but I bet there will be a much lower bias on those, simple because they…
/r/MensRights16/03/23 05:41 PM
-9

even with screenshots he could just regenerate the responses until it fits the bias. or simply edit the text. screenshot if anything only prove dedication.
/r/MensRights16/03/23 05:32 PM
2

this cant really be used as an argument in court
/r/MensRights16/03/23 07:44 AM
1

exactly, and OP was implying in the title that he thinks it doesnt exist, thats what I was pointing out
/r/MensRights14/03/23 06:09 PM
1

what do you mean by that? As I said, the gender pay gap is prove, I dont need to spend 20 minutes readin yout text for that
/r/MensRights14/03/23 04:40 AM
1

I wasnt trying to say that it isnt important, but thats just an explanation for the gender pay gap, it doesnt say that it doesnt exist. I also think that only a very small % of the gender paygap is because of sexism (if even at all nowadays), I was just saying that the gender pay gap still exists, regardless of the reason.
/r/MensRights13/03/23 05:04 PM
0

i dont really see how thats a point, even if its true its very specific cherry picked aspect. In total when you just look at everyone, the gender pay gap exists
/r/MensRights13/03/23 04:33 PM
-1

I didnt read it, but hes right, the gender pay gap is real and proven, thats a fact. the question is just how much of it is because of sexism
/r/MensRights13/03/23 04:59 AM
-3

We dont need a male equivalent for every bs imo, there are enough of those that only apply to men
/r/MensRights12/03/23 04:05 PM
1

You can also be sarcastic without writing /s, many people dont even know about it or dont want to use it because they think it makes it less funny
/r/MensRights12/03/23 03:09 PM
1

how many people vote on a comment is 99% just how early the comment was posted. comments posted in the first hour always get the most upvotes. this comment was posted after 5 hours, and for that 20 upvotes is pretty good
/r/MensRights12/03/23 04:33 AM
2

well judging by the downvotes the comment got (and the upvotes the one above got), socially there doesnt seem to be a very big issue, most people seem to agree with us.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 04:19 AM
2

pretty sure thats sarcasm. Also maybe the title is about a man because thats what was happening in OPs life somewhere. Don't always immediately assume the worst.
/r/MensRights12/03/23 12:31 AM
-5

Thats not what I'm saying, but slapping her like that when youre much stronger is just a clear overreaction.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/03/23 06:14 PM
3

I strongly disagree, it doesnt excuse him slapping her in any way. the first push was maybe still ok, but that slap was way too much.
/r/PussyPassDenied06/03/23 04:12 PM
9

I dont wanna excuse the girls behaviour, but slapping her like this is totally overreacted
/r/PussyPassDenied06/03/23 03:54 PM
1

I know but whe was already away from him after the first time and he really overreacted imo
/r/PussyPassDenied06/03/23 03:54 PM
36

Idk the context, but there was not reason for him to slap her like that
/r/PussyPassDenied06/03/23 02:36 PM
10

I mean just doing sport in general makes you healthier which boosts sperm count
/r/MensRights01/03/23 02:19 AM
78

I'm center with tendencies to a bit to the left. But I also dont see how "being right wing" can be used as an argument against mens rights.
/r/MensRights27/02/23 06:26 PM
2

well because it doesnt work like that, they cant just say "no". of course if really ALL of them would say "no" at the same time it would theoretically work... but how are they supposed to syncronize that? how are they gonna spread the message? also even if just 5% of men want to fight that would be enough to shut down the other 95%. I can almost garantee you that at least 90% of those russian soldiers didnt want to go to war.
/r/MensRights25/02/23 05:17 PM
1

just check 2ch.hk - most of them dont want to go to war, they arent that different from us. they just dont really have a choice
/r/MensRights25/02/23 04:52 PM
5

I had an eating disorder when I was younger, wasted a lot of time with that.
/r/MensRights24/02/23 11:30 PM
5

thats not "new research", thats years old XD
/r/MensRights21/02/23 03:47 PM
2

I mean of course it depends on how you say it. if you say like "lets be friends" than I would also see it that way. but "we can still be friends" idk that wording really smells like a rejection to me, no?
/r/MensRights19/02/23 08:47 PM
3

ah I see it now, thanks
/r/MensRights19/02/23 01:18 PM
3

do you still have the wording from the gender reversed post? Since the title is different, I would want to know how close they actually are.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 12:02 PM
1

yes, but what if they wasnt in a relationship and just werent interested in you
/r/MensRights19/02/23 11:23 AM
17

you mean women shouldnt offer to be friends when theyre in a relationship? maybe its different for others, but for me is a “We can still be friends” a VERY clear rejection, like thats almost as clear as it goes without being impolite.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 08:06 AM
7

I dont quite understand your point... are you just saying that “We can still be friends” is a rejection? or what?
/r/MensRights19/02/23 07:56 AM
1

you cant really say that ChatGPT "evolved" into that, its just how OpenAI changed their filters.
/r/MensRights19/02/23 01:28 AM
14

whether its fair is a different question, but its not illegal, it literally says it in ukrainian law that they can do that in case of war.
/r/MensRights17/02/23 05:34 PM
9

I mean it doesnt hurt at least trying to confront your boss about ir before quitting, what do you have to lose? "she even doesn't know speaking English" is hilarious btw
/r/MensRights17/02/23 05:26 PM
17

you can literally die if you get a big wound on your penis since theres so much blood in that area
/r/MensRights15/02/23 04:26 PM
6

I mean just say polyamory isnt for you, dont be a dick about it. telling a polyamorous person taht polyamory is just rationalized cheating is very disrespectful.
/r/MensRights14/02/23 05:14 PM
9

I wouldnt call TikTok videos "the music industry"... if women sexualize themselves on the internet that was always an easy way to get views, regardless of whether it is about music or anything else.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 03:44 PM
9

non of these are mandatory requirements, but if you suck at everything than you'll probably have a hard time... but remember, its usually pretty easy to go from "complete sucker" at one of those values to "about average". and one your at "about average" for all of these that'll already give you a pretty good starting point even if you arent in the top 5% for any of them.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 11:16 AM
1

I mean maybe its just different in my country or just in my social environment. And of course I've also seen women like that. still, if we start adopting the same behavious that wont destroy radical feminism, that will only play into it.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 02:38 AM
-1

the "opposite of feminism" wont balance out anything, thats just doing exactly the things we were against in the first place. most women arent super extreme feminists, we can still totally live together with them and rely on them. extreme feminists will automatically lose in the long run, we just have to make sure that it also gets portraied that way
/r/MensRights13/02/23 02:25 AM
2

because most people are happier if they have a partner in life and most people are heterosexual.
/r/MensRights13/02/23 01:06 AM
-1

I disagree, that just further splits the two parties apart.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 11:57 PM
3

just say that you dont care - its still illegal and if she actually posts them then shes fucked, so shes probably not gonna do it anyway.
/r/MensRights12/02/23 03:25 PM
-1

I'm not on dating apps, but isnt that just a way to show that they want to be the dominant partner?
/r/MensRights11/02/23 07:15 PM
-2

I think youre kind of missing their point, I dont think anybody has a problem with the consent. That being said I also dont think that theres any problem with dating a 19 year old
/r/MensRights11/02/23 02:51 PM
0

I think youre kind of missing their point, I dont think anybody has a problem with the consent. That being said I also dont think that theres any problem with dating a 19 year old
/r/MensRights11/02/23 02:50 PM
-13

I think youre kind of missing their point, I dont think anybody has a problem with the consent. That being said I also dont think that theres any problem with dating a 19 year old
/r/MensRights11/02/23 02:50 PM
-1

I think youre kind of missing their point, I dont think anybody has a problem with the consent. That being said I also dont think that theres any problem with dating a 19 year old
/r/MensRights11/02/23 02:49 PM
0

I think you kind of missed their point, they have a problem with the consent... that being said I also think that theres no problem with what hes doing
/r/MensRights11/02/23 02:48 PM
0

I think you kind of missed their point, they have a problem with the consent... that being said I also think that theres no problem with what hes doing
/r/MensRights11/02/23 02:48 PM
25

why do you think its fake? doesnt seem that far fetched to me. also judging from her comment history OP really seems to be a woman.
/r/MensRights11/02/23 02:14 AM
1

no it isnt. you just have to do it in a respectful way. and if you arent sure for example if somebody is lying, then it isnt "the truth" to accuse them of it.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 08:36 PM
1

I didnt say that at all, but you cant just call someone a liar before you know it for sure. also kindness and truth dont exclude each other. just be kind, like seriously, theres rarely a reason to be disrespectful towards anybody
/r/MensRights10/02/23 08:07 PM
1

you dont have to disprove it, she has to prove it. that being said, I dont think why either of those points would matter, assuming they are both true. in both cases sexual abuse still exists and we should try to lower it
/r/MensRights10/02/23 07:52 PM
2

in the case you described theres already stuff backing up that she's lying, thats a different story. I meant immediately assuming it without even questioning it further. before you know otherwise you can at least be respectful about it. assuming either way is equally false, but one is disrespectful and the other isnt, thats why its worse
/r/MensRights10/02/23 07:39 PM
0

I dont think you should immediately believe anybody, but immediately assuming someone is lying is even worse.
/r/MensRights10/02/23 06:41 PM
2

well he gave her that attention. he doesnt have to comment if he doesnt want to. but being disrespectful is the worst of both worlds, because that justs proves her point.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 05:51 PM
2

even if it isnt true, maybe she really believes it. in that case being disrespectful wouldnt help at all. It would help to respectfully talk about it and try to fully understand her side of the story.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 05:50 PM
2

I only know what you know too
/r/MensRights09/02/23 05:47 PM
3

that statistic doesnt disprove anything she says, but he implies as if it would. thats very disrespectful, especially to someone whoe might actually be traumatized. I agree that its not even that unlikely that its just a hatepost. we should still try to be better than that. It will pay off in the long run
/r/MensRights09/02/23 05:02 PM
0

you implied that she wasnt actually raped and either lied about it for attention or is to dumb to understand that. I dont see any other reason why you would have mentioned that statistic there
/r/MensRights09/02/23 04:59 PM
1

tbf I dont know his exact comment, maybe that was a bit too harsh. I just assumed it because of the way he described it
/r/MensRights09/02/23 04:58 PM
7

that isnt a reason to get on their level and being disrespectful and hateful yourself. We should try to be better than them.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 04:55 PM
4

that still doesnt justify being disrespectful. you dont know whether she was trolling. and even if she was, it wold give a much more positive light on the mens rights movement in general if people starting being less disrespectful and hateful. I really dont see how being disrespectful would help in any case
/r/MensRights09/02/23 04:25 PM
11

whether this women was raped or not is a different question, but you arent helping the situation by just accusing her of lying and being dumb, thats not how it works. If you want to talk with her about it, try to use some empathy. ask her what happened, what she wished would be different etc. then you can explain the mens perspective. and who knows maybe she actually was raped, you cant just assume that. being disrespectful wont get you anywhere. I dont think you deserved to get banned, just say…
/r/MensRights09/02/23 04:16 PM
-45

wdym, we should ban her here for commenting here or what? that doesnt make sense lol But its true that we at least dont ban people at all just depending on what subs they use, at least as far as I know
/r/MensRights09/02/23 08:56 AM
-11

I totally agree, this sub is almost as shit as the feminist subreddit. fucking hate it here tbh. everyones just trying to be the victim and cherry picks every information possible to portrai the other side as evil.
/r/MensRights09/02/23 08:54 AM
35

It's just more accepted/normal that women act like childs
/r/MensRights08/02/23 09:18 PM
1

do you really hack biologie to alter our perspective on attractiveness? Like dont get me wrong I'm a Biohacker too lol, longevity and so on is definitely something to work towards
/r/MensRights05/02/23 03:11 PM
3

I dont disagree with you. though tbf with the beautie bias, I dont think theres a lot we can do, thats kind of hardwired into our biologie
/r/MensRights05/02/23 10:56 AM
4

yea, same for men only maybe a little bit less. life isnt fair.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 10:41 AM
1

thats not what he's suggesting though, since almost everybody is against the war but doesnt actively do much. And he didnt show at all that feminists are less likely to participate in active helping, protests ets
/r/MensRights05/02/23 10:08 AM
1

tbf I live in germany, but I dont know any feminist whos not for stopping the war...
/r/MensRights05/02/23 09:45 AM
1

if thats the case then the title of the post is simply not true
/r/MensRights05/02/23 09:01 AM
1

thats a good point. but still in the end the only thing that matters is what consequenses come out of it
/r/MensRights05/02/23 08:57 AM
2

well in that case russia also would have taken a large part of ukraine. tbf your view cant really be proven wrong... I personally just think that it would be dangerous not to stop russia from what they are doing. attacking a country is still against international law and we cant just let that go unpunished if you will. of course its also possible that russia would have actually just stopped there and it just brings peace. personally I find that rather unlikely... especially do I think that its j…
/r/MensRights05/02/23 08:07 AM
2

russia is sourcing weapons from several different countries, I dont quite understand your point...
/r/MensRights05/02/23 07:50 AM
1

I might have understood you wrong... You just said earlier that most feminism in america is just driven by capitalism, so I thought they would be pretty much the same thing for you. and you title kind of suggests it too, like saying that feminists dont want to stop the war at least suggests that they want war.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 07:48 AM
3

you just want to give russia ukrain? or what exactly do you mean by promissing not to provoke them?
/r/MensRights05/02/23 07:01 AM
0

I'm sorry, but thats just delusional. Women usually dont want men to just die. A lot more women might "hate" men or just have a wrong idea of how life feels as a man... But no feminist will ever tell you that the war is a good thing because it kills off men! Stop seeking conformation on the internet to justify more and more extreme world views. Speak to real women and ask them for their opinion... chances are women arent as evil as you think.
/r/MensRights05/02/23 07:00 AM
9

saying that they make men a victim doesnt invalidate our points. Of course it shouldnt be the goal that people sympathise with our side because they want to feel as a victim. But thats a problem on both sides and as I already said it doesnt have anything to do with our points.
/r/MensRights30/01/23 12:25 PM
1

68% is not close to 100%
/r/MensRights28/01/23 04:38 PM
0

you were making the claim that 100% of mass shooters are circumcised though. so you have to back that up.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 03:27 AM
1

"reseach logic" lol. You make the claim -> you have to back it up. It's that simple.
/r/MensRights28/01/23 01:54 AM
1

I mean it's hard to say whether it's a joke or not without us knowing why he even banned you
/r/MensRights28/01/23 01:53 AM
10

I mean you could still try to make it less extreme. Also some parts are just not true, like that they critizise the declining in manliness of the culture or that it's a far-right movement. The whole article sounds like it's written by someone who just heard the word "anitfeminism" and then had to guess what it is.
/r/MensRights26/01/23 02:54 AM
5

I think the main issue is that it's trying to depict that Antifeminism is against everything Feminism is for which is just not true. I doubt anybody here is against women being able to vote or go to universaty.
/r/MensRights26/01/23 02:51 AM
-1

Like I dont know what excactly she said of course, but that women around the age of 16-22 are most attractive to men of all ages is pretty much proven at this point. Of course there can always be exceptions, but thats definitely the general trend.
/r/MensRights21/01/23 02:28 PM
4

Thats true of course
/r/MensRights10/01/23 03:16 AM
7

counting how many steps you go is certainly an "interesting" way to messure how hard somebody works. That being said suggesting that the study is invalid just because the researchers where female is just as stupid.
/r/MensRights09/01/23 11:49 PM
2

yeah, in germany too XD
/r/MensRights06/01/23 08:43 PM
1

like I havent looked into it, but simply by the amount of loli porn I see online I thought it was legal
/r/MensRights06/01/23 08:42 PM
1

Interesting, I didnt know that
/r/MensRights06/01/23 08:41 PM
5

yeah but it doesnt involve actual kids right? Like Loli porn is legal too if I'm not mistaken and thats also pretty much child porn. I think its just about whether actual kids were abused in the process.
/r/MensRights06/01/23 01:08 AM
0

I dont even understand why I get downvoted, I mean my statement really shouldnt be controversial, should it?
/r/MensRights06/01/23 01:06 AM
1

can really stories count as child porn?
/r/MensRights06/01/23 12:44 AM
1

we dont know
/r/MensRights06/01/23 12:43 AM
-20

I mean it's hard to judge that without seeing what you wrote
/r/MensRights04/01/23 05:36 PM
-2

Ok I dont really watch teen movies so yeah. But are you sure they were shaming him? Like for example I've also seen multiple memes were you could see a girls hard nipples through their shirt and people kind of found it funny but I wouldnt necessarily say they were shaming her.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 11:35 PM
-1

Of course not, I didn't say that. It's just that I honestly never saw a women shaming a men for just being horny, only for doing inappropriate sexual things, do I thought maybe that's what op meant.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 01:09 PM
-2

I honestly never saw it. But of course being on your period isn't an excuse either, I agree with that.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 01:07 PM
-27

Never saw a women shaming a men for being horny... But of course being horny isnt an excuse to do inappropiate things.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 05:23 AM
2

So basically you just want more money? I mean thats a problem many people have to face. I'd just try to live in the moment and dont stress yourself too much.
/r/MensRights03/01/23 05:21 AM
1

having empathy and being nice are two different things
/r/MensRights30/12/22 10:41 PM
3

Tbh I don't fully understand that post either, bit all the top comments under it are in favor of abortions
/r/MensRights21/12/22 06:00 PM
6

I didn't see that,can you give me the link?
/r/MensRights21/12/22 05:18 PM
15

I think it would be helpful if you first actually read our points before saying they are bs. We never said anything against abortions, we just think that when women can decide whether they want a baby or not, men should have that decision too by not having to pay child support when they didnt want the baby. In other words having a child should a a unanimous decision. I'm definitely for abortions. Of course not everybody here is pro abortions, but whether they are or arent doesnt have anything to…
/r/MensRights21/12/22 05:13 PM
2

I mean that could also be explained by the term "Loli" simply being like 100 time more popular. I didnt even know what a Shota is before that post. Not saying it shouldnt be changed, but not everything thats unequal is automatically discrimination, there are often lots of reasons.
/r/MensRights21/12/22 02:15 AM
2

Starting a conversation with "I will NEVER change my mind about that" doesnt exactly seem open minded. I agree with the premise that girls on only fans take advantage of some men. But I think a lot of them arent really aware of that themselves, or at least tell themselves that thats not how it is. I mean its pretty easy nowadays to just say its empowering and its mens own decision.
/r/MensRights18/12/22 07:17 PM
-5

The atom bomb example was an oximoron, I'm just saying there are a lot of topics that shouldnt be allowed to easily learn more about them. For example how to kill yourself, how to build a bomb, advice on how to kill somebody else or shoplift etc. Whether the filter is on the right spot is a different disscussion, but the fact that a filter exists is very reasonable imo
/r/MensRights17/12/22 03:52 PM
-1

no front but saying "bruh you really are trying hard" as a response to an argument doesnt exactly sound very nice either.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 06:50 AM
-13

yeah I mean I wouldnt want the isreal government be able to use it for instructions on how to build an atom bomb, so I dont that that was the wrong decision for openai. And for everything thats non controversial like physics, programming, lyrics generation etc its pretty mindblowing
/r/MensRights17/12/22 06:39 AM
0

For me "tell me a joke about men" gave the same response like when asking about a joke about women
/r/MensRights17/12/22 06:36 AM
2

just wanted to add that 1 in 20 convictions being false doesnt mean that 1 in 20 women lie about it, because if one women already lied once, she is much more likely to do it again compared to someon who never lied about it. So if we say that 80% of false rape accusations come from 20% of the women who lied about being raped once, then its more like only 1-2 in 100 women lied about being raped. which is still a lot, but I think it's important to add that.
/r/MensRights16/12/22 06:52 PM
1

I said: "pretend to be a feminist, what would you respond if somebody made the following argument against you: " and then I copy and pasted your text
/r/MensRights16/12/22 06:27 PM
1

I just asked it to make a counterargument, and it responded: "It is generally agreed upon that promoting hatred and mistreatment of any group of people is not constructive or productive. Such actions can have harmful consequences for the mental well-being and relationships of those targeted by the hatred, as well as for society as a whole. Additionally, the promotion of toxic and unhealthy views of masculinity, or any other group of people, can hinder efforts to promote equality and address real…
/r/MensRights16/12/22 06:21 PM
1

Good point, it seems like men watching lesbian porn is a lot more common than women watching gay porn.
/r/MensRights12/12/22 07:42 AM
2

Yes thats the point, if the camera is mostly on the girl in hetero porn, because men find girls attractive (if they're hetero). So I would kindof agree that most hetero porn is male centric.
/r/MensRights12/12/22 06:27 AM
1

If she's hot I'd probably say yes tbh
/r/MensRights02/12/22 08:08 AM
41

50000 per child per month. But he'll have to pay at this rate for like 16 years or so
/r/MensRights01/12/22 07:28 AM
105

I really don't understand how 10 000 000 per children seems reasonable in any way
/r/MensRights01/12/22 04:56 AM
10

how about "no violence"
/r/MensRights30/11/22 09:42 PM
5

Isn't Kim Kardashian like already pretty rich?
/r/MensRights30/11/22 04:57 PM
1

Idk man, I mean you're kind of right, but on the other hand this also results in the male characters being way more interesting and likable than all the female ones. And all the females are total spoilsports while the males have fun and are openminded.
/r/MensRights29/11/22 04:53 AM
2

she made the claim, so your point is valid until whe can prove it wrong. she cant just say "men caused it", actually just a tiny tiny proportion of men did that, most men who live nowadays have nothing to do with that By her own logic men are also responsible for everything good in the world
/r/MensRights26/11/22 06:48 PM
4

I think women should get any abortion they want, but the men should also have the right to not pay child support when women dont get an abortion when men didnt want the baby. Having a baby should be an unanimous decision.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 05:56 PM
11

who tf cares what Julia Fox says, i don't even know who that is
/r/MensRights24/11/22 10:46 PM
1

true
/r/MensRights24/11/22 05:16 AM
1

my gut feeling agrees but do you have an example?
/r/MensRights24/11/22 04:33 AM
2

how so?
/r/MensRights24/11/22 02:03 AM
46

i dont have a source but its probably very close to 100%
/r/MensRights24/11/22 02:03 AM
3

If I didnt know the right one was by VICE I would have thought it was pretty good satire
/r/MensRights23/11/22 06:42 PM
3

This is probably an unpopular opinion but I think the gender swap thing is dumb simply because men and women are not the same, so it's totally ok and fair that they dont get treated the same in every situation. Like dont get me wrong, of course there are a lot of examples where the genderswap thing works, but there are also a lot where it doesnt and even one counter example is enough for you not being able to do the argument like "It's bad when you swap genders so it's also bad without swapping …
/r/MensRights20/11/22 06:57 PM
10

It's totally irrelevant if it's karma farming, only thing that's relevant is if it's a good post
/r/MensRights20/11/22 06:06 PM
19

It's tradition to post this every year
/r/MensRights20/11/22 05:30 PM
14

"Same procedure as last year?" "Same procedure as every year James!"
/r/MensRights20/11/22 05:27 PM
0

Ok that's understandable
/r/MensRights12/11/22 01:33 AM
0

why didnt you confront her with it? like not in a way of "ha got you" or something but rather just ask her why she did it and tell her how it makes you feel.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 12:38 AM
4

This is so dumb I cant even wrap my head around this being real
/r/MensRights03/11/22 07:22 PM
1

the question is what number of women she thinks is enough and she says 9. Meaning everything under 9 women is not enough for her. And even if that was like just a lie to see how people react it would be stupid, because people obviously react to the fact that she says that everything under 9 women isnt enough and not to 9 women being in the supreme court.
/r/MensRights02/11/22 09:18 PM
25

she says that everything under 9 women isnt enough
/r/MensRights02/11/22 12:27 AM
328

So if 9 men are in the supreme court its unfair, but 9 women is just enough lol
/r/MensRights01/11/22 09:54 PM
42

Men have the priveleg to go to war while women have to look for their kids, so unfair 😠
/r/MensRights01/11/22 02:14 AM
4

I dont understand why she doesnt wanna tell her ex boyfriend though. I mean there are only 2 possible outcomes, either he wants to keep the baby, which would also be good for her because then she gets rid of it or he doesnt and then nothing changes
/r/MensRights31/10/22 12:48 PM
0

I could be wrong but this guy probably just wanted to see how people react and doesnt actually thinks that way
/r/MensRights27/10/22 04:13 AM
3

You can tell it's a bad show when they accuse people of being sexist for not watching it, so I didnt watch it.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 08:43 PM
2

the thing is, it's not even sexist, it's that way in EVERY part of life. If not enough people decide on working in farming, the government will force some.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 11:17 AM
-4

Im not homophobic, but I dont think there is a contradiction in being MRA and homophobic.
/r/MensRights18/10/22 12:32 AM
-4

hot take but I think the "what if the genders where switched" argument is very stupid very often, because men and women simply arent the same.
/r/MensRights11/10/22 10:54 PM
0

Thanks for the effort! only one question about the rape rates - if I understood that right your main source basically draws the data from the NCS. So in this case doesnt it only display only the rapes that where brought to the police?
/r/MensRights09/10/22 10:39 PM
1

You didn't,you always just say genitalia should be covered because it's genitalia.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 08:43 AM
1

I understand, but my question isn't just why nipples don't have to be covered but rather why nipples don't have to be covered but genitalia does. When the default state is not to cover anything, why are you for covering genitalia?
/r/MensRights08/10/22 08:39 AM
1

I really don't think it's important whether nipples are genitalia or not. I would also agree that they aren't. But that doesn't explain why they shouldn't be covered when genitalia should.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 12:09 AM
1

well as I said for example because its a very sexual part for a lot of men. the reason I'm not arguing a lot is that I'm not really neccesarily for or against women covering their nipples, I rather think that boobs are very simular to genitals in this point, so I dont understand why you are against forcing people to cover nipples but for people being forced to cover genitals.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 11:40 PM
1

hm maybe but I dont think it is, since I cant really think of any reason why men should be forced to cover their nipples, but for women you could make an argument
/r/MensRights07/10/22 11:34 PM
1

the rules apply equally to both parties, both men and women have to cover their boobs. men just happen to not have boobs
/r/MensRights07/10/22 11:12 PM
1

It's fair because the rules are consistent and not sexist. If men had something that turns women on the same way boobs turn men on, they should be covered too.
/r/MensRights07/10/22 07:05 PM
1

Yeah that would be my question lol if you think we should have individual choice about clothing, why do you still think genitalia should be covered?
/r/MensRights07/10/22 07:00 PM
1

That doesn't make any sense, if the discussion is whether boobs (which isn't genitalia)should be covered,then the question IS whether we should cover something that isn't classified as genitalia. What I am trying to say is, that I don't see how whether something is genitalia or not is an important factor to consider when thinking about whether it should be covered in public. Also I'm not arguing for or against anything in particular, I just want to know why you think genitalia in public isn't ok…
/r/MensRights07/10/22 06:55 PM
1

But why should only genitalia be covered. Like it's just a word
/r/MensRights07/10/22 06:45 PM
1

No I meant why do you think it's an important factor for whether you should cover it in public or not
/r/MensRights07/10/22 06:40 PM
2

But why do you think whether it's used for intercourse is an important factor?
/r/MensRights07/10/22 06:38 PM
3

Why do you think penis and vagina should be covered but not boobs (or do you even think that)?
/r/MensRights07/10/22 06:35 PM
3

Idk but a lot of men get turned on when they see them and that's kind of what it is about no?
/r/MensRights07/10/22 08:53 AM
2

Oh damn I legit didn't notice there are 3 more o_O
/r/MensRights06/10/22 11:00 PM
10

I mean I agree it would have been better if they included men. But how does this "downplay the mass raping of young boys"? Imho you're being a bit over-particular here.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 07:52 PM
6

Was the same with Boys (not the amazon prime series "The Boys", there was like a comedey sitcom thing about gay men), after it flopped it was all the fault of transphobics
/r/MensRights06/10/22 05:17 PM
1

I agree with that for things where gender isnt important (for example most jobs) gender shouldnt be a criteria. though I'm not 100% sure whether all feminists agree on this point actually.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 05:02 PM
6

I dont agree, because the point of it is mainly so the private parts are hidden and a mens chest is not a private part, though boobs are. It's not inequal because its based on on something different than gender
/r/MensRights06/10/22 04:51 PM
7

There's actually a study on this, women see 80% of men as below average https://archive.ph/ZJymw
/r/MensRights05/10/22 12:07 PM
2

do you mean pussy pass? but why not just use fiminism, you wont convince people by using insulting words
/r/MensRights02/10/22 11:25 PM
11

I dont even understand why she only got 5 years for that. A false rape accuse is at least on the same level as rape and somebody who raped women 60 times would definitely gotten more
/r/PussyPassDenied02/10/22 10:28 AM
5

I thought it was the opposite tbh
/r/MensRights01/10/22 10:11 PM
6

she also spoke out against women going into porn, so thats one plus point at least
/r/MensRights01/10/22 10:33 AM
1

I dont agree with everything he says, but I think he brings up a lot of important points
/r/MensRights01/10/22 10:01 AM
2

didnt watch the whole video but I'm pretty sure she isnt a feminist, so it doesnt really prove anything
/r/MensRights29/09/22 08:57 AM
1

men have fighting and hunting more in their genes than women. evolutionarily men just did a lot more fighting and are therefore also more likely to for example play fps games nowadays and also do mass shootings when they are depressed.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 10:05 PM
3

it isnt really disproportionat if you think about it, because the ones doing the mas shooting are the ones that are like really depressed. like lets see it this way, the time in which man and women are running 100m arent that far away, only like 1 second. And even though the amount of people we would classify as "very good runners" are probably like 60/40 men, in the very very top that means that all people who ever run under 10 seconds are all men and no women at all. its a staistical thing bec…
/r/MensRights27/09/22 10:03 PM
7

im not really on that sub, but in this case abortions are more a religious debate and not a feminist one.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 01:57 PM
1

I mean as long as shes nice and I like her I wouldnt care, just maybe be a bit extra careful with things like getting kids or marrige.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 12:39 PM
3

To be fair idk a lot I'd do when I was a woman for a day either. Maybe apply for a Job interview lol
/r/MensRights22/09/22 01:50 PM
1

when I'd ask a critical question on a feminist sub I'd get banned instantly lol
/r/MensRights21/09/22 01:44 PM
1

I would join
/r/MensRights21/09/22 01:43 PM
1

i dont know if male birth control sense, but if it works, dont has a lot of side effects and isnt super expensive, then it probably does.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 01:02 AM
1

I hope it doesnt have a lot of side effects. Like the female birth control pill has so many sideeffects, if I was a women I'd most definitely not take them
/r/MensRights18/09/22 01:00 AM
3

I think most companies simply cant afford to boast obaut not having diversity nowadays, or maybe they could but are afraid they get cancelled on twitter or something.
/r/MensRights16/09/22 07:40 AM
1

I dont even see it as a bad thing, since the people on this sub are so extreme that even otherwise rather feminist subs dislike them, so its actually kind of a good deterrence
/r/MensRights15/09/22 05:41 PM
6

The thing is I wouldnt even say its objectively wrong to find this funny, but it's just a big double standart. Like they always pretent it's about equality, but these cases clearly show that nobody gives a fuck about equality, they just need someone to blame their problems on.
/r/MensRights14/09/22 01:43 PM
-8

most unbiased reddit user
/r/MensRights13/09/22 07:39 PM
0

I'm not saying you should convict anybody based on assumptions. Of course it's innocent until proven guilty, but assuming the accused is innocent doesn't rule out that we can treat the women respectfully.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 09:10 PM
-18

Idk why you get downvoted, you are totally correct and everyone who applies it differently probably just didn't understand the concept.
/r/MensRights12/09/22 01:27 PM
1

at least the pals at r/facepalm are the same opinion here. wouldnt have surprised me if they defneded it as some kind of womens choice bs
/r/MensRights11/09/22 12:52 PM
0

Society does. But besides that I was just explaining what I think about that topic. I wasn't saying that my opinion is universally true or anything like that
/r/MensRights11/09/22 01:01 AM
-1

It's all a matter of benifits it gives society vs harm it does to society. I'm fairly sure that banning women from getting near children is doing more harm than good. Whether rising the legal age of driving for men to 21 is benificial I can't tell for sure if course and I didn't say I am, but if it is, it would be a good thing to do it.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 10:23 PM
-7

That might be true, but I'm not arguing over whether it's legal, but over whether it's moral
/r/MensRights10/09/22 08:22 PM
-8

Women and men often have different laws, because man and women are different. It's not automatically discrimination just because different people are handled differently.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 07:13 PM
-25

Honestly if it is true that young men have a much higher risk at causing accidents than women, I wouldn't even say that this is discrimminating, it's just pragmatic. They don't really prove it well in the article, since they only look at absolute values, not relative ones.
/r/MensRights10/09/22 11:41 AM
1

I think almost everyone gets payed less than DiCaprio
/r/MensRights07/09/22 02:39 PM
2

I mean I watched it and imo it wasnt too bad. Like it had nothing to do with gender equality id why it was billed that way. but she mostly talked about herself to relate with the people there. shure the speach was pretty superficial but i wouldnt say shes narcistic just because of this speach
/r/MensRights06/09/22 09:52 PM
9

Or maybe they are cheating on their SO and want to justify it to themselves
/r/MensRights06/09/22 06:54 PM
1

The way I see it is that your friends aren't really wrong, of course the women wouldn't cheat if the man was 100% perfect. When a man cheats on a women it's the same. Though the question shouldn't be who's fault it is, but rather who did something wrong.
/r/MensRights06/09/22 06:53 PM
0

no garantee that this is true but wasnt he also in the matt walsh film "what is a women" explaining how it doesnt make sense to be trans because its just normal deviation in character which doesnt have to do with gender?
/r/MensRights04/09/22 02:11 AM
1

i share some opinions with him and i dont share others, but i like how he speaks, i always know what he means and he isnt super emotional about topics
/r/MensRights04/09/22 02:09 AM
1

if the woman wants abortion, she gets an abortion. if the man wants an abortion but the women doesnt, she doesnt get an abortion, but the man doesnt have to pay child support
/r/MensRights02/09/22 01:37 AM
1

The men that are polotitions are only a tiny small amount of all men. So to say that "men oppress..." can definitely not be drawn out of this argument, because even if the politicians oppress someone, 99.999% of men don't.
/r/MensRights29/08/22 11:44 AM
1

you have to see it the other way around, by not being over 6ft tall, you automatically sort out all the girls who say that their partner has to be above 6ft and since most of these girls are idiots its actually a good thing!
/r/MensRights25/08/22 06:00 PM
2

They didn't even get the graphic right, if really 98.1% are men, then 2 of the 95 people would have to be a woman, not just 1
/r/MensRights16/08/22 02:03 PM
1

just because other subs are doing it wrong doesnt mean we have to do it wrong too.
/r/MensRights28/07/22 03:07 PM
1

ok thats fair.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 11:12 AM
1

Well I dont believe you. Dont get me wrong Im not trying to say its unfair or anything like that, of course its entirely her own fault. but usually people are still egoistic and try to get a good situation for themselves
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 02:06 AM
-4

what would you do if you were in her situation?
/r/PussyPassDenied26/07/22 01:00 AM
2

👏
/r/PussyPassDenied20/07/22 05:26 PM
2

no
/r/PussyPassDenied16/05/22 09:37 PM
0

im for abortion, but this women oof
/r/PussyPassDenied22/04/22 05:40 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter