TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Glad-Way-637 Archive

View 0 posts and 1,341 comments by Glad-Way-637 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,341 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

It being about "safety" is not in fact "one thing" considering women are the safest demographic in existence, realistically speaking.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/07/26 10:08 PM
1

Every accusation is a confession, and all that.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/07/26 10:07 PM
2

That "feeling safe vs being safe" thing is one of the biggest points, lmao. So many folks convinced that their perceptions and feelings matter more than the actual facts of a given matter, and far more than how those "perceptions and feelings" are either exactly the same as or at least shockingly similar to every kind of bigotry they decry otherwise.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/07/26 10:06 PM
1

Same reason that minor male rape victims of adult women are forced to pay child support. Mostly comes down to wealth/social status of the man in question, really. "More recently, in 2014, Nick Olivas of Arizona was forced to pay over $15,000 in back-payments to a woman who had sex with him when he was 14. She was 20 years old at the time." https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-about-trauma/201902/when-male-rape-victims-are-accountable-for-child-support#:~:text=More%20recently%2C%20in,A…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/07/26 07:33 PM
9

You don't need to be reverant of shit to simply notice this particular double standard, get off your high horse ya geriatric.
/r/MensRights23/07/26 10:16 PM
13

I assume you feel the same way about the people upvoting it?
/r/EverydayMisandry22/07/26 08:35 PM
1

Holy sliding goalposts, batman. Which is it, are you arguing that one is used more, or that no woman ever uses one? It's astonishing how confidently ignorant you are on how men in general categorize these things or react to them, really. Yes, visually masculine women. Ones who actually express attraction towards other women sexually get hit with the "no better than a man!!!!" Schtick from their routinely misandrist peers. Besides, straight women use it to denigrate themselves and even men all th…
/r/MensRights22/07/26 07:43 PM
1

Weird, I don't feel particularly embarrassed. Oh well, maybe it'll kick in after another month 🤭
/r/MensRights21/07/26 02:11 AM
6

Good for you. I find yours detached from reality, with you ironically falling into the same "to the privileged, equality feels like oppression" pitfall feminists use to complain so often. Abortion should be legalized, but let's not kid ourselves about what the former US legality status was on an objective egalitarian level.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 01:06 AM
7

It's a correct way of looking at it. You're welcome for informing you that your perspective on the issue was lacking.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 12:40 AM
6

So first of all, you're describing the US, not the west in general. Second of all, that was a right (to terminate parental responsibility or consequences) afforded to women that men have never really had, either pre or post birth. As much as I think abortion should be legal, it was objectively a case of women having more legal rights and privileges than men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 12:24 AM
4

I also strongly believe that the lowest hanging fruit and the best issues to confront first are indeed the ones that reform and realign modern feminism back into a movement that is focused on gender equality and away from the blame centric gender war contempt that plagues it today. Even you know that's never actually going to happen, right? Can't reform something back into a state it never occupied in the first place and is violently and presently opposed to occupying in the future.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 12:06 AM
9

Women are not living in a system that is any more fundamentally oppressive to women than it is to men. Not the ones in the west that make up the majority of feminists, at any rate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/07/26 11:30 PM
1

Women will absolutely say "like a man" to denigrate... basically anything they want. Lesbians on the internet very commonly use the phrase to get mad at other lesbians for not performing attraction to the correct "feminine" standards.
/r/MensRights20/07/26 11:25 PM
2

Here's some examples of systemic misandry: the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for identi…
/r/MensRights20/07/26 11:22 PM
13

Nah, that's giving them too much credit. This subreddit hasn't made you hate women just like the internet didn't make those women hate men, those women are just hateful people. The internet just gives them a more mass-media option to broadcast their hatred.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/07/26 09:39 PM
3

More cases like that than not, just ask Erin Pizzey. She was run out of her country with death threats for suggesting one. The only reason there aren't more stories of feminists opposing the practice is because it doesn't really ever get so far that they have to.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/07/26 09:17 PM
16

I agree with you completely. But all the woman-only and woman-catered subs end up that way eventually. Odd how that turns out.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/07/26 09:31 PM
1

If that's true, then my apologies for assuming otherwise. It'd be nice if reddit gave an edit history for any given comment, just having the "edited" tag with no context often makes me suspicious of what was originally said. No, you just insist repeatedly that you think less of them do it, and that it is less impactful when they do... which is just as bad IMO. Maybe worse, because then it's bigotry that can't even bother to be honest with itself. Why is it that you perceive all that, when no evi…
/r/MensRights13/07/26 10:35 PM
2

Mm, either I misread the original comment, in which case sorry, or you edited out the egregious lack of the word "not" which seems likely given the fact that the comment was edited. Funny how you fail to answer my question too, ain't it? The specific comments actually wasn't on this sub, my bad for misreading otherwise, but it's your rather regular parroting of brainless "uhhhmmm, misandry hurts, misogyny kills, misandry is just a fully justified reaction to the actual sexism and violence that m…
/r/MensRights13/07/26 08:40 PM
2

Oh, you're very aware... of all the men who are victimized, and why all of them feel that way? Are you a man or a woman? The answer to that question drastically changes my response to that ridiculous assertion. All the ones you've made on this sub, largely minimizing men's issues and arguing against actual equality. Please keep up.
/r/MensRights13/07/26 07:55 PM
7

All the ones women have. Judging by your comments on this sub, something tells me you're very against that actually happening.
/r/MensRights13/07/26 12:31 AM
3

I'm not criticizing victims of rape, I'm criticizing people who are off-kilter enough to cite the low conviction rate as an abysmal problem that must be fixed, since surely all those tossed-out accusations are true! It does! Not really what you're failing to talk about at the moment though, please keep on topic.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 09:13 PM
3

"The abysmal conviction rate" is abysmal in what way? It only reads that way if you believe the vast majority of accusations are true, which is ridiculous. Iirc some 10% of accusations are found to be false, same as the % found to be true. The rest simply have not enough evidence to decide either way, so the accusation is tossed, which is how the justice system should work.
/r/MensRights11/07/26 08:56 PM
3

Not to people living in places used to it. People living in places where it never previously got this hot, though...
/r/EverydayMisandry11/07/26 08:49 PM
2

And yet, it happens. Provably so, in fact. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749597823000560 Even just in hiring decisions, sex-based discrimination is rampant. what makes you so convinced it's absent from other areas of the workplace?
/r/MensRights10/07/26 07:39 PM
4

The goalposts ain't shifted, look at the comment again and do your best to read it this time. It has direct CDC-provided evidence against your ridiculous claims on the proportion of male vs female perpetrators of these sorts of crimes.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 09:37 PM
12

Then I suppose it's quite odd that every single job I've ever had has had different dress codes for men and women. Hell, I've seen men fired for wearing the same things the women around them were wearing. Where do you live that it's universally illegal?
/r/MensRights09/07/26 09:02 PM
6

Yeah, sadly people like you who deny statistical evidence are allowed to stick around. What a shame. Here's some examples of systemic misandry: the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20sho…
/r/MensRights09/07/26 08:40 PM
15

The women in the HR department who write the dress codes.
/r/MensRights09/07/26 08:16 PM
2

Accurate username is accurate.
/r/MensRights06/07/26 11:37 PM
8

That's because you aren't paying attention. We don't live in "some (decades) ago" we live in the modern day. "They" that is to say feminists fought for women's bodily autonomy, all the while claiming to be fighting for true gender equality, and talking about how they totally will help men too if men continue to help them, just after this next women's issue. The draft and infant genital mutilation? Sure, if you ignore abject government-backed combat slavery and the mutilation of those too young t…
/r/MensRights06/07/26 08:42 PM
8

So the best you have, is lip-service in an attempt to "ease the load on poor innocent mothers" and a basic "hurrrrr army bad" bit of lip-service? Not working to extend the draft to women, or even to get rid of the draft itself, just general anti-army sentiment? I'm sorry, but your examples are awful.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/26 02:59 AM
13

It's not going to happen at all. When the other side categorically refuses to budge, meeting them in the middle just results in nothing but lost ground.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/26 10:19 PM
17

Lmao, like hell we will. Men have tried that for as long as feminism has existed and promised that they cared about male issues too, and that they'd totally help out once women's more pressing issues were sorted. Well, decades on and feminism has only really worked against men's interests, and towards increasing female privilege when they're already ahead. Meeting them in the middle is impossible. I've not found those supposedly good-faith feminists IRL either, and do trust me when I say I've lo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/26 10:09 PM
16

They do? Well, I'll see how much I believe that when your country decides to turn male Ukrainian refugees back or not, I suppose. Honestly, I bet it depends on your geographical location, but around where I live? Yeah. The billionaires ain't the ones making the school system provably biased against men, they ain't the ones manipulating stats to try and fear-monger around men and those who advocate for them, and they ain't the ones insisting that even more funding needs to be diverted away from i…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/26 10:07 PM
26

Not every idiot who shares a political "side" with you is evidence of a psy-op buddy, that's ridiculous. If those good faith feminists existed in any real numbers, we wouldn't be here right now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/07/26 08:59 PM
23

This, among many other reasons, is why you should be wary of trusting female therapists as a male.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/07/26 10:58 PM
1

Oh, the 70s. Soooo, 50 years ago and entirely irrelevant? Should've figured. Not gonna go through a big list of studies and comb through for the few that make your statements less silly 🤭 You really can, though, and probably should in instances like this if you dont want to waste anyone's time/injure anybody. The thing with black people is racism because being black has no realistic impact on ability to complete a given job. People being male or female, in a job that requires strenuous manual la…
/r/MensRights03/07/26 08:11 PM
1

Sounds interesting. Have any of those studies? Also, when were they conducted? Bias, maybe, but one that is correct in the vast majority of instances. There's significant overlap between men and women when it comes to strength, but that overlap is rarely if ever occupied by men who do physical labor professionally.
/r/MensRights03/07/26 02:43 AM
1

You vastly overestimate the "hardships" of female asylum seekers in modern EU nations, tbh. They practically are on vacation, in comparison, and in some cases literally are on vacation, though that last bit is reserved for only the wealthiest.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/26 01:54 AM
2

Not really a bias if it has to do with their physical capability to do the job at all tbh, in the case of manual labor jobs.
/r/MensRights03/07/26 12:40 AM
8

I mean, it is? Lmao, if they live in the same city there's not gonna be that many specific groups. And it's real easy to tell who these pages talk about, they give ridiculous amounts of identifying info amidst the outright slander, thats rather the whole point.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 11:47 PM
3

Hah, that's funny. Anyone with a comment as inane as yours in a feminist sub would just be banned, especially if they had the gall to be male while making it.
/r/MensRights02/07/26 02:00 AM
8

Oh nothing, egalitarianism is ideal. You just play-act at it without actually practicing it in any meaningful way, though, and it's quite obvious from your lack of criticism toward feminists or feminist ideas for just about any reason. Feel free to provide an example of you making the sort of comment I originally replied to on a feminist sub or talking point if you'd like to prove me wrong.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 11:01 PM
10

It's always the wannabe egalitarians that are convinced of their righteousness that are the most annoying ones. If you need a reminder, just go ahead and search your username in the sub. You notably hide it on your profile, so that's the simplest method.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 10:46 PM
15

The position of someone with more empathy than sense, or ability to look at historical precedent for femist actions and stances on men's rights issues? The position of someone who thinks they know more about men's issues and the way feminism treats men than men do? Besides, if that was your goal, then literally every single recent comment from you on this sub wouldn't be trying to shout down men describing their issues, or at least something along those lines.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 10:40 PM
15

Who is we, here? You and the other feminist brigaders on this sub definitely are. You even admit outright in other comments that you "used to be on our side" so why bother sticking around, much less categorizing us the same way as yourself?
/r/MensRights01/07/26 10:25 PM
5

Funny that the best that can possibly be expected from these people is still just lip-service. Not even calling out bad actors in her movement, just... talking about how they exist. This is some good lip-service though, all things considered.
/r/MensRights01/07/26 09:19 PM
16

Lol, difference is that feminism is a group you join because you agree with prevailing feminist opinions, while "men" is a group you join by birth. You cant even be bothered to be consistent for the duration of a single sentence.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 08:43 PM
17

Not only are you a massive outlier (at best), you spend longer here fussing about us talking about the article than you do criticizing it. She just said the quiet parts out loud, we both know most feminists are roughly this bad. Those "many feminists" are coincidentally completely and utterly silent whenever it comes time to actually call out the bad actors in their movement. That would tell you something, if you had the basic mental capability to listen.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 08:42 PM
22

You're thinking of most of feminism tbh, but radical feminism especially.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 10:09 PM
1

Nope, not at all. It was a theoretical one, hence the questions, but the amnesia was very specifically due to a French interrogation drug that Strauss sourced.
/r/MensRights30/06/26 03:04 AM
5

"I rarely ever talk about these topics" is you saying that you have a metaphorical white belt, outright. Are you high, buddy? You didn't even say it was your observation, you just made an incorrect and frankly silly claim about how "most people when they talk about it" act.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 11:51 PM
6

So... you have little experience on the subject, had one unpleasant experience, and decided you knew enough to generalize about how most people use the word?
/r/MensRights29/06/26 11:41 PM
1

I disagree that this is how "most people" use it. I think you've mostly been spending too much time around Tumblr tweens, tbh.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 11:36 PM
4

I agree with basically every part of this. I ain't that much of a leftie, but I hang around enough of 'em to see that you're correct.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 11:18 PM
-1

There are plenty of sane people on this sub. Sad that many of the less-sane ones crawl out of the woodwork for posts like this.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 10:59 PM
3

Your reply to me seems to have been deleted. If it still shows up on your end, feel free to open an incognito tab and check the thread, it ain't there for the rest of us.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 10:58 PM
4

That lasted for like... 2 weeks, and ended up the way it did due to very, very specific forum cultures and stereotypes about those cultures. The same thing would be impossible to have happen with the word cis, considering it describes over 95% of people.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 10:54 PM
4

Hey, hey, just checking, no need to get so immediately defensive, I didn't even claim anything 🤭. You gotta admit though, the wolf-related username with an 88 at the end doesn't paint you in the best light. What trouble, specifically, is created by calling trans people by the pronouns they wish to be called by? They're less than 3% of most western societies anyway, I doubt half as much trouble has popped up as you catastrophize about. Women's sports? What sporting events have trans women actuall…
/r/MensRights29/06/26 10:53 PM
-2

The unscientific and homophobic gender theory... that there is a difference between cissgender and Trans people, a difference worth noting with a verbal descriptor? Out of curiosity, is that 88 in your username a reference to anything specific?
/r/MensRights29/06/26 10:34 PM
0

The context of... indicating that a given man is not trans? I've never seen it used any way except neutrally outside of Tumblr tbh, and if we let those overly dramatic tweens decide how language is used we're all fucked in the end anyway.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 10:32 PM
-17

Nah, not in any way. No more than straight male is, it's a simple descriptor.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 10:21 PM
1

Not quite. They didn't plan to give anyone else the amnesia, the coma was to deal with isolation murder issues. The amnesia was a Grace-only solution to the significant problem of his free will in the situation.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 08:37 PM
1

No reason besides not wanting to die quite so subjectively quickly, perhaps. I wouldn't call Strauss any smarter, just less careful with Grace's life than he was.
/r/MensRights29/06/26 08:36 PM
4

Oh dear, let me get out the actual math again. Poor thing, you've entirely failed to read the part of the comment where I inform you why that is an incomplete way of looking at the stat, I see. https://bjs.ojp.gov/female-murder-victims-and-victim-offender-relationship-2021 .06 * 17,970 ~= 1,078, the number of men murdered in a year by their wives. .34 * 4,970 ~=1,689, the number of women murdered in a year by their husbands. Unless my math is notably worse than I think, of course. Keep in mind, …
/r/MensRights26/06/26 07:25 PM
5

Someone who makes unfair and innacurate negative generalizations against an entire demographic, or more applicable to you, someone with an unfounded prejudice against people of that demographic. Often due to ill-informed paranoia and a general deficiency in backbone at best, or actively bad-faith assumptions even more often than that. In the US, 2 women kill their husbands for every 3 men that kill their wives, and that's as recorded by an extremely biased legal system. A similar amount of men a…
/r/MensRights26/06/26 06:07 PM
1

I know that. In the universe in question, space travel is a pretty damn big deal, not like they're in a drought of qualified astronauts. Yeah... like the thousands if not tens of thousands of other biologists who were working on the issue? C'mon. Mm, another detail they may have left out of the movie? Could've sworn they mentioned it, but perhaps not. The amnesia was absolutely a side effect of the drug, if not the main reason they used it. You really ought to read the book or at least listen to…
/r/MensRights26/06/26 02:39 AM
1

I mean yeah, but c'mon, there's other astronauts out there with enough general biologist competency to do the job just as well. You wouldn't need massive amounts of training, and even if you did, that'd just make drugging and amnesia-ifying the guy so he forgets all the training even more silly. It's the only major plot-hole introduced by the movie, IMO.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 02:12 AM
2

Well, to be fair to OP, the movie doesn't explain exactly why those millions will die without grace, they leave out the entire coma gene subplot.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 02:00 AM
3

There's one particularly deficient person on this sub who was walking around saying exactly this earlier today. Is this in reference to them?
/r/MensRights26/06/26 01:47 AM
0

Because you're a brain-broken fool with a pathologic need to downplay men's issues and catastrophize about women's inconveniences? It's quite obvious considering that is literally all ypu ever do or have done on this subreddit. I don't need to misrepresent anything, you hide your account history like a coward but a simple subreddit search of your username shows it all. Glad you think so! Youre incorrect, though.
/r/MensRights26/06/26 12:19 AM
2

Simply an irrational one, then? Does it count as you having a brain if you simply choose not to use it? 🤔 My argument is correct, and helps explain the actual facts of the matter. I'd rather resources not be wasted further assisting the already-privileged population, obviously, and you'd feel the same if you didn't have the comically visible-from-space bias that you do. The man-focused legislation can only come about when people stop seeing women's slight inconveniences as more impact full than …
/r/MensRights26/06/26 12:16 AM
0

My argument against the first claim is to copy and paste the same spiel I so helpfully provide to all the other brainless feminist brigadiers on this sub. It has the info in question if you feel capable of reading it, you're welcome, go forth and be less ignorant 🫶. While IPV may be more severe against women on average as recorded by a biased legal system, it is absolutely not more prevalent against women. Quite the opposite. You absolutely do though, looking at all available evidence. Better th…
/r/MensRights26/06/26 12:10 AM
0

And yet, the constantly yap about how IPV is a predominantly female issue, when the majority of victims are men. By a slim margin, but still. Coincidentally, when actual egalitarians like Erin Pizzey try and help male victims of IPV, they get ran out of their country with death threats by all those feminists you breathlessly defend. There's a reason for that. Anything more is either lip-service spent on male issues with no intention of actual assistance, or merely helping men as an unwanted bypr…
/r/MensRights26/06/26 12:01 AM
2

Maybe if you're a biased politician with a hammer of "increase funding toward women's education" and are on the lookout for nails. My argument is one based on actual material conditions rather than a brainless defence of feminism and unequal advantages for women, which after looking through your participation on this sub, seems to be the only thing you're mentally capable of producing. And yet, you still defend them refusing to do so, and instead making the imbalance actively worse. There's a re…
/r/MensRights25/06/26 11:43 PM
1

Feminism doesn't do even half of that shit in practice, and you'd know that if you were an actual worthwhile human being who could have a sane discussion on this sub rather than spending all your time sucking up to an objectively sexist movement.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 11:37 PM
1

That first claim is complete bullshit btw, in the US as many men are raped per year as women, and all claims about it being less severe when it happens to men come from nowhere but your ass, or the assumptions of some feminist you took as gospel. Here's some examples of systemic misandry: the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfo…
/r/MensRights25/06/26 11:34 PM
2

Ah, poor thing, guess not, then. It's not manipulating shit, just to give the actual reasons for why something happened and the exact reasons why it is bad, namely that women are already ahead. Dropout rates are the part they actually care about, and it's quite obvious by the fact that decreasing birth rates would just as easily be accomplished any number of ways without privileging women further in an area they're already privileged in.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 11:26 PM
3

What do you think a lie actually is, dolt?
/r/MensRights25/06/26 11:16 PM
51

Usually after that they start blustering about how there are more male elected officials than female ones, and they really don't like it when you point out how more women than men vote in just about every country with a vote.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/06/26 09:27 PM
6

I'm correct. Seriously, buzz off. We have no use for people who are both ignorant and bigoted, we insist on at most one or the other, not both.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 09:10 PM
6

And you're seemingly illiterate, since this comment doesn't reply meaningfully to a single thing he said.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 09:08 PM
4

Nearly as many men are murdered by their wives every year as women murdered by their husbands. Nearly as many women kill men as men kill women. Be less shit.
/r/MensRights25/06/26 08:34 PM
5

Identical reported rates of loneliness... and men making up 80% of those who suffer the actual consequences of chronic loneliness. It's hilarious that you think the "egalitarian" part of your profile description is fooling anyone.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 09:14 PM
70

It is, unfortunately, the best you can expect from them. Even the ones who genuinely try to understand male issues... fail completely. If they weren't the type to no-true-scotsman their way out of having to push back against misandry from feminists, they wouldn't call themselves feminists at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/06/26 06:45 PM
1

No problem, have a good one!
/r/MensRights24/06/26 02:02 AM
4

That the person I replied to makes a whole hell of a lot of rather unsupported assumptions.
/r/MensRights24/06/26 01:15 AM
7

Some more than others, though... like when dating a person who already has kids. Your first comment made a bunch of assumptions about what OP thought about step-fathers, no? They never said they were anything like bad people, but you took that assumption and really ran off with it. Also, not my post. Try and read usernames, please.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 10:49 PM
1

I mean, the claim in the title is just a correct one. Men in general do not have power over women in general, and women in general have notably more legal rights (especially toward bodily autonomy) than men do.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 10:39 PM
7

They might not have known how grim the outlook can really be though... hence the post, letting folks know it ain't likely to be all sunshine and rainbows, no?
/r/MensRights23/06/26 10:38 PM
8

This does not necessarily equate to them having the best time in their relationships with single mothers.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 10:14 PM
1

Again... where did I state that? Are you getting me mixed up with someone else? I don't think men in general have power over women in general, certainly not in the US, but that's a very definitive statement I don't remember writing. Is the alcoholism finally getting to me, or what? Nothing you've said has been particularly relevant to that conversation either, now has it?
/r/MensRights23/06/26 10:10 PM
20

Yeah. It's so weird, the presence of the "gay accent" is the determining factor for these women more than the presence of a boyfriend, in my personal experience as a bi man.
/r/EverydayMisandry23/06/26 09:52 PM
1

Did I? Where did I ask that? Now you're just making shit up 🤭 An entire country's voting patterns, ones that are shared by most of the world... are anecdotal? M'kay.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 08:23 PM
5

Only when I see someone who deserves to be insulted. Congratulations on being one of those! Did anyone ever claim that there were no examples of laws men can influence, albeit no fewer women than men, that affect women? Even in the post, that seems quite absent to me. They may vote that way, but when the time comes to form a white feather movement and socially enforce the draft, who always shows up? Besides, that's just in the US, in places like Germany they actively vote to keep the draft, and …
/r/MensRights23/06/26 04:54 AM
7

You'd be wrong to do so though, considering nobody enslaved those women at all. Just restricted them from one specific course of action, a bit different than actual slavery. Lol, more history from long before either of us were born, used in a feeble attempt to defend your own modern bigotry and blindness towards other's issues. Predictable. The draft may pre-date women's suffrage, but many cases of the draft being used certainly do not, not even in the US. You can't even accurately verbalize the…
/r/MensRights23/06/26 02:00 AM
6

Huh, the source I originally used to get my numbers gave me 53% of voting men voting for Trump. Most that I look at now lean more towards 55% though, so you're probably correct on that front.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 01:53 AM
5

Meh, it's like 29.5% or so, I just rounded up. Where did you get the math from that 35% of men voted for trump?
/r/MensRights23/06/26 01:38 AM
17

Women getting to vote and decide that men should be enslaved for warfare purposes is a bit different than what you describe, and certainly an argument for women's legal and social advantages/privileges over men.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 01:36 AM
6

Don't worry, the things you genuinely believe are hilariously ill-informed enough without intention on your end! Meh, abortions due to rape were so incredibly rare even when abortion was federally legal that I fail to see how it compares to the massive history and current practice of conscription. Especially considering a (female dem) politician just made registration automatic in the US, removing what little choice men had in the affair right as we got the most war-mongery president we've had i…
/r/MensRights23/06/26 01:35 AM
12

Lol, poor thing. Hears one inconvenient truth and immediately jumps to shaming people over made-up dating issues, this girlie is not at all ok 🤭
/r/MensRights23/06/26 01:22 AM
15

No, buddy. That's the percent of people who voted, who voted for each candidate. I gave the percentage of the total populations who voted, taking into account that some 30% of people never bother voting at all.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 01:20 AM
17

33% of men voted for Trump, compared to 30% of women.
/r/MensRights23/06/26 01:06 AM
29

Why are you obvious brigaders always hiding your account history? It'd be easier just to make a seperate account for you to say this dumb shit on. Not really when compared to the government policies that disproportionately privilege women over men, no. Here's some examples of systemic misandry: the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.…
/r/MensRights22/06/26 11:42 PM
23

You dont seem to think much at all, abortion (that is to say, unconditional abilit to avoid the consequences of an unplanned pregnancy) was never a right that men had that women did not, and almost exactly as many women voted for anti-abortion parties as men.
/r/MensRights22/06/26 11:38 PM
18

Did you just... fail to read the post beyond the title, or what? If you're gonna turn off account history and go brigading, at least put in a little bit of effort.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 11:12 PM
1

No, I think you're 4 because you post dumbass "girls drool Boyz rule" shit on the subreddit for discussing men's rights. Women work too these days, just often not in the most dangerous/physically strenuous jobs, stop acting like a child.
/r/MensRights21/06/26 09:55 PM
18

In real life I do see people "just spout misandrist stuff" quite frequently. Not so for misogyny. Maybe you just ain't paying much attention, dipshit?
/r/MensRights21/06/26 04:18 PM
17

I mean yeah, but hopefully you at least pay basic attention to the stereotypes of the name, if nothing else.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/26 11:59 PM
1

Yup. Sorry if I came off a bit hostile in the last reply, just re-read it lol, my bad.
/r/MensRights18/06/26 10:55 PM
38

It's really unfathomable the utter lack of thought that certain people are paid to put into these movies.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/26 09:59 PM
2

It's saying that 70% of non-reciprocal DV in hetero relationships comes from women, yes, which is exactly what I claimed. Reciprocal DV has equal perpetration from both sexes in hetero relationships, for reasons that should be obvious. This means more women are domestically abusing men than vice versa.
/r/MensRights18/06/26 09:36 PM
4

I did, buddy. Please read the rest of the comment. The CDC sexual violence surveys show that ~80% of male victims have women as their perpetrator.
/r/MensRights18/06/26 02:30 AM
7

Women rape men more often than men rape men (and women rape men about as often as vice versa, in the US), among other things. the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%2…
/r/MensRights18/06/26 01:54 AM
15

"In nonreciprocally violent relationships, women were the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17395835/#:~:text=In%20nonreciprocally%20violent%20relationships%2C%20women%20were%20the%20perpetrators%20in%20more%20than%2070%25%20of%20the%20cases. In the reciprocal cases, the stats are even, for obvious reasons.
/r/MensRights18/06/26 01:52 AM
4

All that citation that you gave for your own "points" is... where, exactly? Poor dolt, if you didn't have double standards you wouldn't have any at all.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/26 02:31 AM
2

So, you're saying that the vast, vast majority of people calling themselves feminists simply aren't that? Weird, why do you supposed egalitarian feminists never actually speak against the much more common misandrist version? Do us a favor and cut the lip service, jackass. You group each other together all on your own.
/r/MensRights16/06/26 01:53 AM
2

Ask Erin Pizzey, who was ran out of her own country with literal death threats, directly from her feminist peers, for suggesting a men's DV shelter.
/r/MensRights16/06/26 01:51 AM
2

Women are never encouraged to work male-dominated? Lmao, you should've just said you were posting in bad faith to start with, could've saved us all some time reading your idiotic bullshit. What system did "men" set up, do you think? Did the men today make that system, or is this more sins of the father schlock, your poor braindead fool?
/r/MensRights16/06/26 01:49 AM
2

A term that is *these days, entirely gender neutral, used against anyone and everyone. FTFY Feminism does not equal "equality" like you claim, quite obviously. Just ask Erin Pizzey, chased by feminist death threats across half the globe, or Mary P. Koss, given a very lucrative career and much acclaim by feminists due to her constantly claiming (and even manipulating data to support these claims) that it's impossible for men to be raped, and "laughably absurd" to think they could be raped by wome…
/r/MensRights16/06/26 01:47 AM
6

Lol, you and I have different definitions of "many."
/r/MensRights15/06/26 09:31 PM
18

Can you specifically point out what you think is misogynistic or non-factual here, or are you just throwing a little fuss that someone is accurately characterizing history and acknowledging systemic misandry, Ms. Hidden account hidtory brigadier?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/26 07:43 PM
7

Founded by a man... but conveniently entirely staffed by women, and criticized by very, very few of them? Mmmhmm.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/06/26 07:38 PM
2

Lmao, only if that "genuine advice" was worth a rat's ass. Very often it ain't. Even when it is, most often that sort of advice is meant to make the speaker feel good, not actually help men they way you feel entitled to men helping women. Do you have a source for any of this women are wonderful schlock, or is this more "activism outside of that done by women is nonexistent!!" historical revisionism? All of these claims read as complete bullshit to anyone with first-hand experience being a man. L…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 01:53 AM
1

1920 is the year women got a (universal, iirc land-owning women could vote before then same as men for a long while) vote, in the US. Feminist movements in the west were far more popular than you paint them as, and you'd know that if you paid any attention to history. Lmao, you'd say that literally no matter what happened in a men's movement, because to you, like most feminists, any progress for actual equality in areas women are advantaged is regression. You're just flat-out incorrect on the "w…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/26 01:48 AM
1

Yeah, sure you could've. It would've been a stupid thing to do though, considering the success of women's liberation movements in the 1920s in most of the west. Men's movements? Conveniently treated as hate groups universally by feminism, even when they come from feminists. Just look at Erin Pizzey, who was chased out of the UK by death threats for wanting to start a men's DV shelter. Those death threats followed her to the US as well, for all of her life, just btw. Certain groups with a lot of …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 06:56 PM
1

Do you think women in general have enough of a moral compass to try and help men they don't know... basically in any situation at all?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 06:41 PM
1

The latter isn't ever going to happen while women still hate men more often than the opposite going by survey data.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 06:38 PM
1

Well, we know for a fact that your ass won't be putting yourself in anything even resembling danger to try and protect any men, so why should they do anything similar for you?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/06/26 06:37 PM
8

No, no you are not. You're claiming that the people on this sub are any worse than the ones on those subs... like an idiot who doesn't pay any attention to what the people here or there actually say. Keep up. This sub does not "mostly comment negative and controversial thing" controversial maybe, not mostly negative though. Do ypu have any actual examples of people on this sub pretending that and not being soundly mocked by all the comments?
/r/MensRights13/06/26 06:17 PM
6

Keep it coming! Soon we'll make it to tin foil, I can't freakin' wait.
/r/MensRights13/06/26 02:10 AM
8

Now we're getting somewhere! Most relevant and worthwhile thing you've written in weeks.
/r/MensRights13/06/26 02:07 AM
8

Write something worth reading, for once.
/r/MensRights13/06/26 02:03 AM
2

Would that suspicion be misplaced? IME those people are often way less sincere than they appear.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/26 01:58 AM
10

No, but it absolutely does correct the misinformation your brainlessly parroted. You're welcome 🫶 Edit: lol, and there's the respond-and-block dance. Guess some people can't handle being corrected ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 11:54 PM
2

Ok buddy, let me be more direct: if there's specific comments you have problems with, link them. I don't know why specifically liking the game destiny is bad, or what specifically the other person has said in that (admittedly, quite often shitty) subreddit, and I'm not inclined to go digging through account history on a "uhhmmm, he said problematic things at some point in his account history!!!!" Comment. You may well be correct, but it's considered very rude not to give specific examples when m…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 11:53 PM
1

If you're gonna say something like that, at least pull out some specific examples. It's impolite not to.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 11:46 PM
10

Women commit more DV than men do, among other things. the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 11:45 PM
9

Hence why more and more young men just aren't voting at all, bud. You've got the party that hates you, specifically, while claiming to be egalitarian and the one that hates everyone (with fewer than 7 digits in their bank account) as options. Hypocrites who can't even be bothered to pretend otherwise and outright evil people, what to do? I still voted for the dems myself, bur I can see why many wouldn't.
/r/MensRights12/06/26 11:36 PM
5

You give the mods of feminist subs way too much credit, and massively and unrealistically catastrophize about people in this sub in the same breath. Go home teenager, you've never said anything worth reading in this sub or any other as far as I can see.
/r/MensRights12/06/26 11:33 PM
20

That's not a person who "thinks straight" it's one who thinks men are the perpetrators of 99% of rapes. That is to say, a complete and total dumbass. That guy isn't working with anybody, just search the sub for some of their other fantastic contributions (since they're too cowardly to show their account history normally), such as the standard "uhm, akshually, those aren't real feminists!!! No True Feminist!!!!!" Schlock they semi-regularly spout. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/HV3deYq8vA
/r/MensRights12/06/26 11:11 PM
24

Also, women are more likely to joke about men being raped than men are. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34978934/
/r/MensRights12/06/26 10:44 PM
20

Among other things, men are half of rape victims, and women half of perpetrators. Do better or buzz off, bigot. the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20Am…
/r/MensRights12/06/26 10:44 PM
52

Here's some examples of institutional misandry, along with a source stating that women are half of perpetrators, and men are half of victims. Educate yourself and get your head into the modern day instead of centuries neither of us were alive for or buzz off, bigot. the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1…
/r/MensRights12/06/26 10:42 PM
6

If it's prejudice based on sex, for one reason or another, it is sexism. Weird how y'all are desperate to call that toxic masculinity when women spread it more often than men do by most studies, ain't it? https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34978934/
/r/EverydayMisandry11/06/26 08:05 PM
1

Ah, so you know that, do you? Whatever would us poor hopeless men do with only the evidence of our eyes and ears to go by, without one such as you to guide us? 🙄 Stats about women's misfortunes that coincidentally up-play them massively, while ignoring the fact that men are either just as affected or even more affected than women are for most of the listed points. It being "chock value" is immaterial, most online misogyny is hyst the same and yet we wouldn't find your ass condescending to women …
/r/EverydayMisandry11/06/26 07:58 PM
22

The fact that the statistics are presented in such a blatantly biased way and that some of them have already been disproven, mostly. I can't help but notice your account history is hidden and you only have one other low-effort comment on this sub, are you a bot or a brigadier?
/r/EverydayMisandry10/06/26 12:51 AM
1

Hidden account history, nothing of substance to say, unwilling to acknowledge objective reality... bait, bot, or brigading? Call it here, folks. My bet is on brigading, personally.
/r/MensRights09/06/26 02:47 AM
12

Russia is doing amazing. You really think that?
/r/MensRights09/06/26 02:14 AM
7

And all of them show... that's right buddy, that men's issues are just as important, and it isn't "lowering" women's often catastrophized issues to acknowledge reality there.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 10:44 PM
3

You... goggled women? How do you goggle a woman? Besides the easy joke, are you seriously using the first set of Google search results as an example for why you think men are "taught to take it (sex) from women?" I hope you're just young and not honestly this stupid.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 10:43 PM
8

You literally don't though, especially since both groups experience rape (from the other group!) at roughly equal rates, as per the CDC. Here's some examples of institutional misandry: the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challeng…
/r/MensRights08/06/26 10:31 PM
3

Oh, I absolutely do. Probably just not in the same way that you think they're treated differently though, going by these comments.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 10:30 PM
5

Are you high? I dunno if I agree with the guy who started this chain, but men are not at all taught to rape, and "liking women" isn't even slightly equivalent to that either.
/r/MensRights08/06/26 08:06 PM
3

Okie dokie, I'll take your word for it on that one.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/06/26 07:57 PM
1

Do you know why people pick bangs? I've always been sorta confused tbh, it never seems to look very good compared to not having them. Is it just some convenience aspect I'm too bald to understand?
/r/EverydayMisandry05/06/26 07:48 PM
16

In places like the US with slightly more balanced laws, as many claims are found by the court to be definitely false as claims that are found definitely true. Iirc it's in the 5-10% range for both, woth some ~80% being unprovable. In a place like the UK with their backwards laws, where they'll literally just jail you over a woman's "heartfelt" words? I dunno, but it seems likely.
/r/MensRights05/06/26 06:25 PM
3

Thanks for being understanding despite my accusatory tone, and I hope you have a good one too!
/r/MensRights05/06/26 12:25 AM
3

Ah, that seems reasonable. We've all been there, sorry for being a bit aggressive. Fair enough, maybe I'm being a bit harsh in general.
/r/MensRights04/06/26 11:57 PM
1

Buddy, I'm not erasing that role. I'm explicitly agreeing with you on that front. Repeatedly, in fact. That's what the whole "feminism does good for women" portion of the comment is about.
/r/MensRights04/06/26 11:22 PM
0

It's not the participation, it's the participation combined with the complete lack of practicing what you preached. I can't help but notice you edited the "I don't even go to feminist subreddits!" portion out of your comment, too. You only ever make the above "why do we need to make it a competition" point to men talking about their issues. That's the whole problem. Nobody asked you to dislike women. Just to be honest with yourself and us about what your actual views are on the subject and who y…
/r/MensRights04/06/26 11:21 PM
2

And I think you must not have paid much attention to historical evidence. As I said, they do a lot of good, exclusively for women, and no small amount of harm toward men and their issues.
/r/MensRights04/06/26 11:11 PM
-1

I wasn't looking for anything to attack. I was curious about if you practiced what you preached. You don't. You've commented on r/feminism only slightly less often than you have here.
/r/MensRights04/06/26 10:49 PM
-1

20 bucks says we won't find your ass on a feminist subreddit saying literally any of this. checks account history I should've bet more money, wow. Usually you people at least hide your account history before saying shit like this.
/r/MensRights04/06/26 06:47 PM
5

A lot of good... for women. Historically, they've actively made things worse for men whenever given the slightest opportunity. See Mary P. Koss who was given a career by these people, them running Erin Pizzey out of her country with death threats, and how they react to areas women are substantially over-privileged by trying to increase that privilege (like in education in every western nation).
/r/MensRights04/06/26 06:45 PM
4

Nah, the government just ain't willing to draft them. For reasons that are quite obvious to everyone else, but which you seem to have issues with. I'm sorry about that, it must make things hard for you not being able to use much reason.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 05:12 PM
6

"Won't be penalties for not filing a selective service form after the end of this year" ... because a certain female dem politician just made it so draft registration is automatic for all men (and only men) when they hit 18? Lmao.
/r/MensRights02/06/26 01:32 AM
9

Is there anything like a source that this actually happens, or are you just another woman coming in to make ridiculous claims about men and male experiences without expecting to have to back those claims up? Those "manosphere" people woth fewer youtube subscribers than northernlion don't claim to even be MRAs.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 12:52 AM
10

Lmao, like clockwork you people show up with hidden account histories and a massive bias against anyone giving even a single rat's ass about men's rights. If you must brigade, at least go the extra mile and make a new account? Do you ever call out feminists for the misandrists I their ranks?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/06/26 12:50 AM
3

Probably to leave an abusive relationship if I had to guess, seeing as women are responsible for 70% of nonreciprocal DV.
/r/MensRights01/06/26 11:49 PM
25

Lmao, the average woman did play a role in creating those issues. Why are you infantilizing historical women, when they've been the majority of the population gendered standards to children since forever, and a majority of voters in my country since the 80s? If you must fail to engage with peoples points on this sub, at least don't be quite so disingenuous about it. Because women got the benefits of having signed up for the draft (in this case, the ability to vote) without even an ounce of the e…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 11:22 PM
7

Do you have any actual examples you can provide of you doing so? Not like there's some drought of misandrist feminist subreddits, if you're the type to loiter here already.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 11:16 PM
8

What do you think gives you the right to decide what men should count as prejudice against men, regardless of the source?
/r/EverydayMisandry01/06/26 10:47 PM
11

When a woman is prejudiced against women, that's internalized misogyny, no?
/r/EverydayMisandry01/06/26 10:38 PM
20

Well, when the context of "it" is a bad thing forced upon one by the government, that does make it misandry, that is to say prejudice against men, when men are the only ones affected. Pay just a little attention to the context before being a pedant?
/r/EverydayMisandry01/06/26 09:32 PM
3

No, I know for a fact that your engagement in this sub is all negative. You'd know that if you read my comment. You could tell me why you're here at all, despite being the way that you obviously are.
/r/MensRights29/05/26 04:04 AM
4

No, you don't need one for anything. Your lack of literally anything except negative engagement makes me curious why you bother showing up at all though, enough so to ask at least. What do you think my argument is?
/r/MensRights29/05/26 04:02 AM
5

No, because your account history on this sub is literally nothing but you being a contrarian and condescending ass, who can maybe be argued over into the objectively correct position after much argument... just to continue being a dipshit in the next post. Again, I don't agree with OP much either.
/r/MensRights29/05/26 02:59 AM
3

Then they aren't "turning into the people they hate," now are they? Because "the people they hate" are the ones generalizing based on gender, and unless I'm less literate than I thought, OP ain't doing that. You do know that's the issue we have with feminism, right? Actually, why are you even on this sub to start with? You just seem to want to nothing to do with any actual discussion of men's rights.
/r/MensRights29/05/26 02:44 AM
7

Pretty rarely? Bud, it happens as often as the reverse going by CDC stats. You're not exactly disproving OP's case with that dumbass assertion, and I don't even necessarily agree with them. You're taking convictions from a biased legal system as the whole of the facts, which is silly. the bias in the legal system "A 2020 study shows that women receive 33% (15 days) shorter prison sentences than men, even when controlling for all observable characteristics – including a very precise description o…
/r/MensRights29/05/26 02:35 AM
9

So I'm assuming "no real feminist" gave Mary P. Koss the social standing, lucrative career teaching gender studies, and influence over US Title IX policies she has, then?
/r/MensRights29/05/26 02:33 AM
7

You understand that generalizing a movement that people join as competent adults is not the same as generalizing an entire gender, right? I don't even necessarily agree with OP, some feminists just aren't particularly observant and really do buy that "feminism is for equality for all!" line, but c'mon.
/r/MensRights29/05/26 02:32 AM
3

Well, it seems that men are some 4 out 5 people killing themselves over it, so maybe the whole friendlessness thing is more gendered than you at first assume.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/26 10:58 PM
5

Yes.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 10:41 PM
7

An option, sure. Not a particularly effective one though, going by historical context, unless you're willing to hurt a lot of people, and/or get massacred in droves like a few of those union protests were. Calm down, christ. No need to get so fussy, the comment wasn't even that provocative. I never tried to "liken all feminists" to anything, you might be thinking of a different person.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 09:30 PM
5

... I don't know your answer to whether or not the movie is any good. That's why I asked. Are you new to the whole "conversation" thing?
/r/MensRights25/05/26 09:27 PM
3

Yeah... after reading that I'm starting to think that might just be a kid. Sometimes I wish internet age verification was ever a thing that actually worked.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 09:26 PM
5

Huh. Out of context, that scene seems simply silly. Is the movie any good? Your comment seems less disrespectful and more petulant, tbh.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 08:07 PM
3

Oh, it was a conversation on that whole shitstorm? None of my business, frankly, though that does seem like a dumbass comment on their end. Do you have any examples that support your claim that he doesn't actually care about male victims, and instead only wants to "whine about women?" You clearly don't care much yourself one way or the other, going by your contributions to the conversation.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 08:04 PM
5

Is that what the kids are calling it, these days? At least take me out to dinner first.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 08:01 PM
3

Oh hey, I'm in this one. Yeah, that sub has very clearly just been colonized by misandrist women at this point. They dunno how men work, and don't wanna learn.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/05/26 07:27 PM
0

Bud, you're the one who made the initial claim that it was a strong enough phenomenon to affect this survey to the degree you assumed.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 07:02 PM
1

Do feel free to present it.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 06:18 PM
1

Mm, I'm not at all convinced that this would have enough of an effect in context to make up for the truly massive difference in both stated and revealed perceptions of the opposite gender from both sides. You're welcome to believe otherwise entirely without proof, though, it's a free website.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 06:08 PM
15

If you're going to pull a quote from somebody's account history out and present it without context, it's considered impolite not to at least also drop a link to the source comment.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 06:01 PM
5

Does this look like positive social change, to you? The bombers did not exist in sufficient quantity or competency to convince anyone of anything, they certainly weren't the determining factor in earning women the right to vote.
/r/MensRights25/05/26 05:59 PM
2

That would obviously have the same effect towards women, making it cancel out for comparisons sake, no?
/r/MensRights25/05/26 05:41 PM
15

Too much microplastic, lmao.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/05/26 02:42 AM
2

Thing is, you're vastly overestimating how egalitarian the definition they changed it to was. It still did (and does to this day) entirely ignore women's victimization of men, and simply included only men's victimization of men in the definition written by feminists. There's a reason they wrote it like that, dumbass. They want to continue pushing the narrative that rape is "90% male perpetuated" beyond all reasonable sense. the bias in the legal system "A 2020 study shows that women receive 33% …
/r/MensRights23/05/26 06:13 PM
0

The word of which women? I've met plenty of cis women who are perfectly supportive of trans people. Do people believe unrelated and pointless asides help their argument? I called you a dolt because you quite clearly are. Sorry you had to find out like this, bud 🫶 Of course you're afraid of trans people to an irrational degree, you'd have given me a source for your claim that they're more likely than not to victimize cis people by now otherwise. I need to seek help... because I require actual sta…
/r/MensRights23/05/26 04:29 PM
3

This is according to literally nothing bit conviction stats from a provably biased legal system. The CDC records near-identical rates of victimization and perpetration between genders. the bias in the legal system https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/gender-differences-sentencing-felony-offenders society's unwillingness to call it rape when women do it to men, despite the CDC finding that this is as common as the reverse. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the…
/r/MensRights23/05/26 04:23 PM
5

Oh, I wouldn't know. I'm just going by what I've seen and the studies I've read, which tell me nothing about folks from the other half of the world. I have seen guys get with women who were traveling from over there to the US for college though, and it seemed surprisingly successful despite most of them marrying early for green-card reasons. I would've thought that'd put a lot of pressure on the relationship, but I guess not.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 04:02 PM
4

You're the one who keeps insisting women have it worse, despite all available evidence. Well duh, you clearly haven't been reading any of the comments that laid out how provably incorrect you are, with cited sources. I imagine that has something to do with your general illiteracy issues. Men are victims of violence far more, and make up 80% of murder victims. Want more sources?
/r/MensRights22/05/26 01:08 AM
5

Lmao. "I'm not even gonna engage!" engages anyway That's pathetic. You simply can't fathom having the holes in your faulty arguments pointed out. If you hate it here so much, as I told you earlier, buzz off. Nobody is making you stick around and keep saying dumb shit. You're right, that isn't correct. More men are victims of DV than women. "In nonreciprocally violent relationships, women were the perpetrators in more than 70% of the cases." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17395835/#:~:text=In%20…
/r/MensRights22/05/26 01:06 AM
5

If you can manage, do try and keep your interaction with those men to a minimum. They'd thank you if they knew what type of person you really were 👍 You really think that we'll never be in a disaster situation, and that we've never personally faced discrimination for being men? And yet, you constantly try and insist that women have it worse. Your ass literally started the competition, and then threw a fuss when you were corrected 🤭
/r/MensRights22/05/26 12:45 AM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/4MxyILTOSi
/r/MensRights22/05/26 12:43 AM
7

According to a provably biased justice system? Hilarious. If you use convictions as the be-all-end- all measure in these sorts of discussions, shit gers weird fast. Did you know, that as many women are convicted of falsely accusing men of rape as men are convicted of rape, for example? It's about 5-10% of cases for each category, with some 80% of cases not having enough evidence to convict in either direction, in the US.
/r/MensRights22/05/26 12:42 AM
3

You think it exists, ypu just thoughtlessly assert that it is lesser than women's. Yes, we all read the thread. If you can't manage to buzz off, at least keep up? Thanks. Women literally do not have higher victimization rates of either of those things. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped”…
/r/MensRights22/05/26 12:40 AM
1

Eh, some sympathy for women is warranted. It ain't all sunshine and rainbows being turned into a paranoid wreck by consistent fear mongering. Glad you stick around here despite idiots like the one I replied to, though.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 08:04 PM
5

I've been living in the present, rather than millenia ago.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/26 08:02 PM
6

Lol, your first comment calling me a dork was somehow less empty-headed than this one. That's what is expected of men, largely by women. I don't think it's all that amazing, it's pretty dehumanizing, in fact.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/26 07:13 PM
-1

Women are more safe than men in the vast majority of scenarios, going bu the actual statistical facts. Agree with the rest well enough, though.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 05:59 PM
0

Thing is though, are trans women men? In any really meaningful way? Not from what I've seen. Why are you advocating for gendered rights distribution anyway? It absolutely is just a women's privilege over men, considering the factual reality of how seldom women are victims of just about every crime, compared to men. They are already safe, dolt. If they decide to feel uncomfortable because someone else has decided to exist in their vicinity while having a gender identity they dislike, that's a "th…
/r/MensRights21/05/26 05:31 PM
11

So then why are you constantly parroting shitty and reality-divorced misandrist talking points on this sub? https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/nUJ3zwTIYR
/r/MensRights21/05/26 04:38 PM
10

So, why didn't that work for you?
/r/MensRights21/05/26 04:13 PM
5

Learn to hate everyone equally. We're all about as shitty to each other on average, regardless of birth-decided demographic.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 04:11 PM
36

That women in the west hate men more often than the opposite, obviously.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 03:46 PM
9

That's not an answer, now is it? Seriously, name a western country, I'll tell you what rights women have there that men do not. Those women have been the largest voting population in the US every election since the 80s, take it up with them for voting in male politicians.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 03:33 PM
9

You say, as you routinely minimize men's oppression and catastrophize about women's. Buzz off, nobody wants you here.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 03:32 PM
5

Here's some examples of institutional misandry: the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for i…
/r/MensRights21/05/26 03:31 PM
10

If men are so privileged, why are they the vast majority of homeless people? You're engaging I the apex fallacy, dolt. The vast majority (some 70%, let me know if you want a source) of non-reciprocal DV comes from women towards men. Here's some examples of institutional misandry: the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfonline.com…
/r/MensRights21/05/26 03:28 PM
12

If that second paragraph is true, why do they have demonstrably more rights than men everywhere in the west?
/r/MensRights21/05/26 03:27 PM
5

What do you mean by "trans ideology" exactly? I've met plenty of non-misandrist trans people, if whatever gender you like. Frankly, the trans women are slightly less likely to be misandrist than cis women IME. The worst aspects of feminism are cultural I think, not endemic to women as a whole, that's just misogyny.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 03:26 PM
17

I think you may in fact be genuinely stupid as hell if you think that the deaths of women and children are worse than solely the deaths of men. Buzz off with that shit.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/05/26 02:45 PM
123

Believe it or not, the same study found that the majority of men aspouse positive views towards women in general.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 02:09 AM
2

Safety concerns that are massively overblown? Lmao, women are a minority of victims of all violent crime, and only half of all sexual crime victims.
/r/MensRights21/05/26 01:18 AM
1

Mm, the US usually puts it as less than 21%, that's interesting. Wonder why the top end of that range is so hight for the UK? Regardless, 1 in 5 is pretty rare, comparatively. Not quite as rare as I thought though, to be fair.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 09:50 PM
1

Bad news is, they probably only actually changed their minds in regards to trans men. Whole different thing from convincing them to be less sexist towards men in general. Good on you for your optimism, even if it doesn't seem particularly realistic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/05/26 04:25 PM
1

Then you haven't interacted with many leftist groups IRL.
/r/EverydayMisandry19/05/26 03:39 PM
1

Compared to women who chose to give birth? Yeah, abortion was quite rare, even when legal.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 02:17 PM
1

And much to do with government-backed slavery. Abortion does have quite a bit to do with whether a given person is forced unwillingly to have responsibility for a child they didn't want, too.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 02:16 PM
3

Are you high, or simply illiterate? You keep putting in those "little" asides about how supposedly all of women's privileges are just because of misogyny. That's contrarian. Besides, the court doesn't view them as less competent human beings, it just thinks of them as inherently better and more deserving of empathy ones. That rape was mostly or even commonly only originally illegal due to property laws. Don't worry, we all know you're familiar with being full of shit. Hey, be nice to yourself! Y…
/r/MensRights19/05/26 04:21 AM
3

Bodily autonomy isn't the same as... bodily autonomy. M'kay, you're clearly not serious. Do you think that it's "overwhelmingly majority commited by men" because you treat stats from a biased legal system as gospel? https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/gender-differences-sentencing-felony-offenders "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped…
/r/MensRights19/05/26 03:27 AM
3

"This other thing" being the exact same civil right, but to a much more lethal (on average) degree? Mmhmm, so different. Women lack abortion access. A procedure that is quite rare, even when legal. Men are on the hook for child support even when raped, and are liable to be enslaved by their government's whims, and many people support that. You can say that... and coincidentally maximize women's problems and minimize men's, when you claim it as if men have bodily autonomy either.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 03:23 AM
3

And yet, you quite obviously fail to do it. You even go so far as to pretend these people don't exist, and claim you've never met them. That's the whole problem. You're not "educating" anyone, lmao. That's hilarious. Oh no, you have to... defend the stupid things you say??? Deal with pushback when you minimize other people's experiences? The horror. Nobody said "everybody is the same" genius.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 03:21 AM
2

No, I'm making a very mild joke at your expense. Good for you that you saw the rare non-hypocrite feminist in the wild though, wish I were so lucky.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 03:13 AM
4

"You people" are contrarian idiots who come to this sub with hidden account histories. Where you claimed that it was because the courts see women as less capable of harm, when really they simply have more empathy towards women like most of humanity, as shown in every study on the subject. You agreed with me, then tried to twist things with slightly ahistorical takes about legal misogyny. You can be right about some things and wrong about others, bud. Is this your first exposure to the concept? T…
/r/MensRights19/05/26 02:02 AM
2

It's wrong to assume that they're feminists just because they're women. Some people actually care about gender equality.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 01:59 AM
3

Mmm, so college, then? That tracks too. You definitely wouldn't say a damn thing though, because they wouldn't say that they "hate every single man" in as many words. You've met people like that, they just say "not all men, but always a man" or "I'd choose the bear" or "98% of rapists are men" or any other such shit. "Kill all men" may largely be isolated to the internet, but the people who say it are not.
/r/MensRights19/05/26 01:58 AM
5

Christ, you people even try and make women being treated demonstrably better than men by the legal system out to be misogyny? Hilarious. Meh, I only ever saw a single source claiming as much, while all the others show that women get significantly reduced sentences for the exact same crime in pretty much every scenario. You might be mislead by the fact that only the worst offenses from women are punished at all, compared to even lesser offenses from men.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 07:48 PM
5

And you were wrong to do so yes, that's what the whole comment was about.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 07:44 PM
7

... duh. It's the internet. Nobody knows you. I do know how people like you act, though. The way you talk about this makes it seem like you're a high-schooler. Is that the case? "Standing up for men in isolated scenarios when other men are victimizing them" =/= "standing up to feminists who say wack-ass shit about and clearly hate men in feminist-majority spaces"
/r/MensRights18/05/26 07:43 PM
2

A definition written by someone who knows for a fact they're part of nothing but a women's empowerment movement, but who want to sucker as many men as possible into thinking feminism as a whole will ever do anything to help them when women are advantaged.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 07:25 PM
3

It certainly is when they ain't trying to do that at all.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 07:23 PM
6

Ah, and there's the rub. When you speak to men, those people "aren't real feminists who've for equality." In my experience though, people like you don't exactly stand up to them or even treat them particularly differently when you see them in person. "Supporting women" ain't at all the same as "supporting feminists" and surely even you know that?
/r/MensRights18/05/26 07:23 PM
9

I dunno about the punishment being "exactly the same" when you take into account the pervasive and all but universal bias towards treating female criminals with more leniency than male ones.
/r/MensRights18/05/26 07:17 PM
2

The lack of abortion sucks, but I dunno if you can really call that specific inability to make decisions about your body a right men have that women lack considering what happens to male victims of rape by women who conceive, and that whole thing with the state-mandated combat slavery. "More recently, in 2014, Nick Olivas of Arizona was forced to pay over $15,000 in back-payments to a woman who had sex with him when he was 14. She was 20 years old at the time." https://www.psychologytoday.com/us…
/r/MensRights18/05/26 06:20 PM
2

Yeah, I was also too harsh, it's not like you don't have a point. I just read that specific comparison made really, really often.
/r/MensRights16/05/26 06:58 PM
2

Oh yeah, because places that are simply "bigoted for satire reasons" always stay that way and are never just a thin veneer people place over their actual bigotry, just ask 4chan and the donald subreddit.
/r/MensRights16/05/26 04:24 PM
2

Daily reminder that you can kindly buzz off and make everyone involved better off for it 👍👍
/r/MensRights16/05/26 04:23 PM
12

For the 1000th time, generalizing a social group that someone chooses to be in for how that social group consistently acts is not the same as generalizing half the human race based on circumstances of their birth.
/r/MensRights16/05/26 04:21 PM
5

I sincerely appreciate your optimism, even if I agree with the other guy and his negative outlook on the current specifics of the protests.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/05/26 10:58 PM
7

Sometimes society incentivizes treating them like that, but that doesn't mean they actually are like that. Sometimes they even insist that they be treated like that, but you shouldn't let that diminish your view of them as fully competent human beings. Kindly be less of a sexist piece of shit, please? You make us look bad.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 07:21 PM
8

Men are historically and systemically marginalized too. In the west, they're actually marginalized more severely than women, at the moment. If you're so focused on history that you actively ignore modern reality, you are a truly useless person. Erin Pizzey was alienated from feminism, and then from her whole country, as she was chased out by death threats from feminists. All for the crime of daring to suggest opening a men's DV shelter. There's a reason for that. Many feminists have directly adv…
/r/MensRights13/05/26 05:50 PM
7

You support it... verbally, and will never actually do anything about it while loudly insisting that men should March and donate to assist you with women's issues. Like most feminists, actually. Thanks for the example, historical revisionist.
/r/MensRights13/05/26 05:48 PM
1

There's the new draft registration being automatic that the Dems recently pushed through, but it was sponsored by a republican too, to be fair.
/r/MensRights12/05/26 01:14 AM
2

Based on what examples would you say this is the likeliest case?
/r/MensRights12/05/26 12:07 AM
3

Then, "all you've heard" is the sound of you shouting and plugging your own ears. Lol, first of all women are more likely to be injured in accidents because they drive less on average. They simply have less practice, and so crash more per mile driven and crash harder when they do, on top of being slightly less sturdy on a structural level (which you certainly aren't fixing with modern medical or engineering knowledge). I suppose we'll see if the dummy makes any difference in crash severity or ca…
/r/MensRights11/05/26 09:44 PM
2

Can't argue with that one, tbh.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/05/26 12:24 AM
1

"Admirationally" lol.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/05/26 12:09 AM
3

The funding of different gendered illness research programs sure as hell ain't fake. What do you mean "nothing ever comes out of it?" How do you think we came up with cures/preventative measures for every other disease we've figured out at this point? Cancer is a particularly tough problem, but so were all the others. Bud, be honest, are you trying to sell me on snake oil? I'm hesitant to believe they'd actually leave a promising cure by the wayside, considering just how much money there is in a…
/r/MensRights10/05/26 09:50 PM
8

Ah, then in that case I think we agree. The cult shit is something I can't properly identify the cause of, wish I knew though. I don't think it's the sole reason or anything, but I sincerely do believe that it was a contributing factor. I wouldn't be surprised if you're right about the Gaza thing, too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/26 10:24 PM
1

None of your comments on this sub make it seem like you particularly care about men's rights. Why are you here?
/r/MensRights09/05/26 07:16 PM
1

That's not the same generalization at all, dumbass. The difference is that one generalization is about someone based on their inherent traits, while the other is about someone based on the job they choose and the trends with regards to how shit people in that profession usually are on the subject.
/r/MensRights09/05/26 07:14 PM
1

The problem comes when we have current population levels of old people, but only 30% of today's workforce attempting to support those old people. Social security will go directly into the dumpster, seeing South Korea as an example. Population importing works great, to a point. Past that though, why would those people want to immigrate to a country that'll be imminently worse-off than the one they came from, where they'll have worse odds starting a family, and where laws will increasingly discrim…
/r/MensRights09/05/26 06:54 PM
9

If you genuinely think that women-specific medical and safety issues aren't taken notably more seriously than man-specific ones, you haven't been paying any attention.
/r/MensRights09/05/26 06:12 PM
1

Least convincing assertion I've seen in months.
/r/MensRights09/05/26 05:53 PM
8

"Main driver" behind the rise of MAGA. It doesn't have to push men toward the right, all it has to do is push them away from the left. Iirc both parties lost votes in the last election, dems just lost more.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/26 05:48 PM
23

Thing is, it doesn't have to lead you to support them to contribute to their rise. All it needs to do is drive you away from the left, which voting polls show us happened in the last election. Both parties lost votes, the dems just lost more, especially among young male demographics that traditionally voted blue.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/05/26 05:46 PM
1

And coincidentally, a female Democrat politician just made it automatic for men to be registered, removing what freedom of choice we had. Coincidentally, historically women have been social enforcers of the draft through shaming campaigns. Besides, does it have to come from women to be misandry? Does it have to come from men to be misogyny, IE prejudice against women? Women are allowed into every branch of the armed forces, but never forced in. No, I didn't mean that, because mothers are the one…
/r/MensRights09/05/26 05:32 PM
1

Serious question, do you believe you aren't misandrist? https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/dJlosE610Z Or do you think bending over backwards to minimize and defend misandry makes you anything different? You're wrong in this and every other comment you've made on the subject by the way. Here's some examples of institutional misandry that're all more than the mere reaction to misogyny that you claim: the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers …
/r/MensRights08/05/26 10:29 PM
6

In this case, "haters" are the vast majority of women who use the term incel, so...
/r/MensRights08/05/26 06:27 PM
9

Funny how the young feminists say the exact same shit to applause from their own peers, then.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/05/26 05:55 PM
0

Yes, I know how you feel and are based on the comments where you explain your stance repeatedly, glad we got that sorted out. Actively interpret... you laughing at misandry and downplaying it on this sub with a holier-than-thou attitude the whole time? M'kay. It was two days ago. This doesn't really mean much, the fact that you were really eager to throw it at me is what makes me think it was a token effort on your end exclusively to try and deflect from legitimate criticism, combined with how w…
/r/EverydayMisandry08/05/26 05:00 PM
10

Ugh, another twoxchromosomes addict with a comment history of basically just being a contrarian dumbass on this sub? And you don't even have the good grace to acknowledge that you're not being fully truthful, and that many HR departments do have a large measure of control over both hiring and firing? Sometimes I wish we were like the feminist subs just a little bit, so we could ban obvious bad-faith commenters like you. Why is it that women always feel entitled to decide what "real things" men s…
/r/MensRights08/05/26 03:40 AM
0

Mmmhmm, sure you would, bud. Totally. Well, you're also clearly also capable of being a smug dickhead, if it helps. You're allowed to not be angry at blatant sexism as well, but again, maybe read the room? You "minding your own business" is a very consistent pattern of minimizing misandry on this sub. I respond this way to everyone else who does the dumb shit you do, if it helps, you just think I'm hounding you because you keep doing it. Oh, lmao, really? You had to make a comment after the orig…
/r/EverydayMisandry08/05/26 03:00 AM
–

Enough for you to claim you have any sort of insight into what men talk about "very often" when women aren't around? If I used social media comments to make similar generalizations about women, I'd have some very negative and hopefully innacurate views, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/26 01:39 AM
4

Then where is that respect and care for those people who are enslaved due to nothing but their gender, exactly? Those people who you've previously insisted should still be enslaved due to their gender?
/r/MensRights07/05/26 11:50 PM
1

That's probably because I'm insulting and judging you for your wack-ass opinions, yes. Coincidentally, the fact that I can do this is another facet of this sub's commitment to actual discussion. I understand that you are trying your best. This does not make "your best" anything except advocacting for gender-based slavery, which deserves a bit of internet ridicule IMO. You'll survive, unlike many of the people you think should be sent to war in your place should the state decide the need has aris…
/r/MensRights07/05/26 11:31 PM
1

I wish I could say I was surprised, but I'm not. My issue is not with your tone, but with the actual content of your messages, specifically when ypu think it is "acceptable" for the state to enslave men for combat while placing no real expectation on women to do anything they weren't doing already. Which men should be deciding this, exactly? That's sorta the crux of the whole issue. That... you know that's just a post on psych today, not anything like actual proof, right? Even their linked studi…
/r/MensRights07/05/26 11:19 PM
1

Well, when your "opinions" tend to be largely either ahistorical or conjecture on gendered attributes un-backed by actual study on the subject, I can understand why.
/r/MensRights07/05/26 10:56 PM
1

And I told you that this was a stupid comparison to make in the first place even with your clarifications about specific activities they were "conscripted" for, yes. Where is the disconnect, for you? Not in WW2, again, obviously. The realities of trench warfare are far different than the realities of modern warfare, and strength (the only real measure where men consistently out-perform women from the studies I've seen besides "a lack of in-group bias") actually mattered quite a bit more back the…
/r/MensRights07/05/26 10:51 PM
1

Did you make this account specifically for this comment?
/r/MensRights07/05/26 10:13 PM
1

Don't worry, this place ain't like the feminist subs that ban men for daring to voice their opinions, this place is determined (to a fault) not to be like that. We even let the most obvious bad-faith trolls stick around, here. If anyone is going to be enslaved to fight for their country, everyone should be eligible equally. Obviously. Don't act like there's even half as much danger being a nurse as there is actually fighting. The insinuation that having to get a normal job was anything like comp…
/r/MensRights07/05/26 09:24 PM
3

Why are you asking if you can ask a question? Just ask.
/r/MensRights07/05/26 06:34 PM
1

They edited Mary P. Koss' Wikipedia article to try and hide her controversial statements, too.
/r/MensRights07/05/26 04:43 PM
0

You don't have to be malicious to be a contrarian prick, for some people it seems to come quite naturally. If a man were "having a laugh" about a misogynist joke, neither of us would be particular fans. You don't need to be in the midst of "incandescent rage" to read the room, Einstein. What bullying, exactly? Frankly, I didn't notice it was 4 months old. It was reccomended to me the day I replied. That's on me for coming to a dead thread, though, very bad internet etiquette. I didn't ask for wh…
/r/EverydayMisandry07/05/26 04:27 PM
2

Why are you always like this? Is there an explanation, or do you just have nothing better to do than downplay and make excuses for misandry all day?
/r/EverydayMisandry06/05/26 09:52 PM
6

Sometimes the paragraphs don't show up if you open the post a specific way. It has them on my end though, I think it depends on if you click the "comments" or the "image" part of the post first.
/r/MensRights06/05/26 09:44 PM
17

The red/blue version works just as well for the colorblind, no? And besides, if that was the case the FGM maps would be the same. They ain't.
/r/MensRights06/05/26 09:42 PM
26

As an example of something that's happened multiple times in the US: "More recently, in 2014, Nick Olivas of Arizona was forced to pay over $15,000 in back-payments to a woman who had sex with him when he was 14. She was 20 years old at the time." https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-about-trauma/201902/when-male-rape-victims-are-accountable-for-child-support#:~:text=More%20recently%2C%20in,Arizona%20Republic%20newspaper%3A
/r/MensRights06/05/26 06:58 PM
12

Wow. That's sexism against everyone involved through most of history and pre-history, wrapped in a bullshit pseudoscience package. I'm sincerely impressed.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/05/26 08:39 PM
1

Why delete the rest of your comments, out of curiosity?
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/26 10:13 PM
1

Yours was passable. Managed to kill a bit of time on my shift, at least. Thanks for making the rest of us look less stupid by comparison, eh?
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/26 09:42 PM
2

I provide sources that look at the factual reality of the situation. What about this "favors men" in your opinion, exactly? And evidently not in backing up the dumb shit they say on the internet, to take a page from your book and genericize a gender from a single dipshit. And you have been presented with a reasonably iron-clad study showing women being more weird about men's victimization than men are. Wowie. You know this, huh? I don't suppose it's from either personal experience being a man at…
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/26 09:38 PM
3

I'm glad you're amused, at least. "All wars" have not been created by men. That's so monumentally ahistorical, I don't even know where to start, but a female US Democrat politician (the party I personally favor) was just responsible for making draft registration automatic and fully non-optional for US men. And the over 70% female teaching population has been shown to markedly discriminate against their male students. Do you have any sources for your "girls r smrter" talking point, or are you beh…
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/26 09:27 PM
4

So, when a man is forced to have sex with a woman against his will, that is not rape, in your eyes? Simple yes or no question, even someone like you should be able to answer it, right? Also funny how you ignore the murder thing in favor of using dumbass cherry-picked rape numbers yourself, while accusing me of doing the same.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/26 07:36 PM
7

Here's some examples of institutional misandry: the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for i…
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/26 07:11 PM
6

80% of murder victims are men, and men are also about half of rape victims as per the CDC. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, using the non-gender neutral definition of given in the CDC report. However, on page 19 the report states that d…
/r/EverydayMisandry04/05/26 07:11 PM
2

In theory, absolutely. In practice? Nah, won't turn out that way, going by all historical evidence. I respect the optimism, though.
/r/MensRights04/05/26 01:38 PM
5

Dunno about the EU, but in the US when we have definitive proof that a man was raped as a minor by an adult woman, the courts still rule in favor of the woman. "More recently, in 2014, Nick Olivas of Arizona was forced to pay over $15,000 in back-payments to a woman who had sex with him when he was 14. She was 20 years old at the time." https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-about-trauma/201902/when-male-rape-victims-are-accountable-for-child-support#:~:text=More%20recently%2C%20in,Ariz…
/r/MensRights02/05/26 09:21 PM
2

Yeah. I like this sub much more, personally, but that one ain't quite as bad as it's made out to be.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates02/05/26 03:09 AM
1

Is China really the shining example of economic policy that we should be following? They're a bit of a special case on the subject anyway, due to the unfortunate gender breakdown of the country as a whole and their rather... let's say lax regulations for businesses allowing production to skyrocket as quality of life takes a hit. I do hope you're right, though.
/r/MensRights02/05/26 02:54 AM
35

They don't even claim to represent MRA stuff. Feminists just can't help but paint every bad thing some guy somewhere does as evidence of inherent male sin.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 11:43 PM
1

That's... that's not happening either, where did you even get the impression anyone expected that?
/r/MensRights01/05/26 11:25 PM
9

Women sexually assault men more than men sexually assault men. Did your dumb ass not even read the title? Brigadiers used to at least try, FFS.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/26 11:05 PM
1

There is no way to evolve any economic system so that a society with significantly fewer young (that is to say, working-age) people than old ones will not face significant issues. Maybe if we get more automation and UBI, but if you genuinely think that's gonna happen in this lifetime or even that of the kids people aren't having, you're dumb as fuck, sorry.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 11:03 PM
19

Meh, those stats seem to use the conviction numbers from a provably biased legal system. "A 2020 study shows that women receive 33% (15 days) shorter prison sentences than men, even when controlling for all observable characteristics – including a very precise description of the crime. When pairs of mixed-gender offender are convicted together the gender gap is even higher - men receive 38.7 additional prison days and 10.7 fewer suspended prison days. From a procedural point of view, when contro…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/26 08:34 PM
19

Not the CDC ones. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, using the non-gender neutral definition of given in the CDC report. However, on page 19 the report states that during that 12 months the number of men who were forced to penetrate someo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/26 08:12 PM
1

Source for that second sentences claim? Also, I highly doubt any sort of impact on that front would be immediate, population collapse is a slow thing and people rarely care before they notice how it personally affects them on issues like this, IME.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 04:36 PM
1

Has it? And by how much? I remember reading at some point that birth rates in Korea would need to quadruple in the next 5-10 years to pull them out of a very unfortunate population pyramid and the resulting economic collapse.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 04:32 AM
1

Agreed, great for them. Fucking awful for the economy, and those among us who plan to be alive some 30 to 40 years from now.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 04:31 AM
1

The vast majority of humankind is not doing that pollution, though. Do you really think nations like China and large corporations will just... stop doing things in the most economically optimal (and worst for the environment) ways if populations in the west decline?
/r/MensRights01/05/26 04:29 AM
5

No worries, I see where you might have gotten that idea.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/26 03:23 AM
5

I don't disagree, and I haven't excused anything, quite the opposite for modern feminists. Just said that they had more of a leg to stand on back then.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/26 02:54 AM
7

Well, they didn't get to vote, just to start with. Besides, I'm not quantifying it in comparison to men's issues, just saying that women's issues used to be far more dire than they are today.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/05/26 01:49 AM
1

Because you had it hidden at the time, dolt. Do please try and keep up? Thanks.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 12:25 AM
1

Lmao, being stupid and sexist by... not saying the dumbass things you straw-man us as saying? Lol, poor critter. This subreddit is really quite friendly to women who can put their money where their mouths are. Still waiting on that example of you pushing back against misandry that you claimed to have the other day.
/r/MensRights01/05/26 12:02 AM
4

Sure, feel free. Probably won't respond as quickly, but I'll get to it at some point 👍
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 10:58 PM
3

That's probably not going to do anything. It's being auto-modded out, more than likely because of something you say in it being filtered by either the wider reddit auto-mod or the sub-specific one (though it is possible this is just another example of Reddit's shitty web design eating the comment whole, in which case a repost will work). Maybe change the wording somewhat? That sometimes helps when this happens to me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 10:42 PM
1

Again, you're making shit up to get mad at. Nobody said anything even approaching that.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 10:40 PM
3

I think your most recent comment may have been deleted. If it wasn't you that did it, it could still show up on your end, I reccomend opening the thread in an incognito tab to see it ain't there if that's the case for you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 10:36 PM
4

Well, when we live in a world where men's taxes largely go to supporting women (look it up, they make more from social security funds than they ever contribute towards them), where women hold control of some 85% of US consumer spending, and where they, again, have provably greater rights than their male peers, I dunno. Seems to be working out fine for them. More men than not in the US have thought the same things as those Norwegian boys, for quite a while iirc. Doesn't seem to have slowed femini…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 10:26 PM
2

Are you a man, or a woman? Pretty important distinction here, when you're advocating for men to lose from the moral high ground. Because that is what'll happen.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 09:41 PM
5

Frankly? Feminist's "stated goals" were the empowerment of women over men in every scenario possible, from legal to social to career matters. And what do you know, it worked. Women have more legal and social rights and privileges than men do in every single western nation. Weird how that works out, ain't it? I wish it didn't have to be that way, but it seems that policing bad actors within your own social movement is counterproductive, going by historical examples. Those egalitarian-minded boys …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 09:28 PM
2

Do you know why science supposedly focuses on men? It's because men are the only ones volunteering to be studied, genius. Look it up, women almost never volunteer for that kind of thing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 09:19 PM
6

Why would that be a pre-requisite for MRAs, when feminists happily celebrate the sexist shit-stirrers in their ranks and are roundly rewarded for doing so?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 09:08 PM
1

If you think that second paragraph would do anything even halfway helpful, the first paragraph about you trying to "moderate" this stuff IRL sounds more like a lie than not.
/r/MensRights30/04/26 07:58 PM
6

If you think that this isn't the case worldwide (or at least in the entirety of the west), you're more stupid than most of us expected based on your previous comments.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 07:50 PM
17

You know that's never happening, right? Not in our lifetimes at least, and probably not in anyone else's.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 07:45 PM
16

I mean, feminism has always had serious and generally accepted misandrist undertones. It was just that back in the day women actually were substantially disadvantaged, so people were willing to let more shit slide, and that's why we are where we are now.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 07:08 PM
1

Don't fuss about being called a dumbass when you were acting like one, maybe? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ You can engage if you grow enough of a spine to engage with a single one of my points. Good luck!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/04/26 06:14 PM
14

Did anyone claim that feminism was a "male-extinction" movement, dumbass? I'd they're not for female supremacy, they wouldn't work to widen every single gender gap where women are already ahead, such as in academics or legal rights toward bodily autonomy. What the hell has you so convinced that tyrannical mothers and teachers don't do the same shit, and worse? "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/04/26 07:19 PM
1

And Christianity as a whole is not monumentally biased towards those "un-chridtian" idiots. Christianity as a whole doesn't claim to work for gendered equality while actively working against it whenever the oppurtunity presents itself. There's a reason for that. Because the vast majority of feminists agree with Koss and those who chased Erin Pizzey out of her country, in my experience. The vast majority of Christians are not MAGA dumbasses, in my experience. L
/r/MensRights29/04/26 07:13 PM
1

Nah, I give people shit for their opinions, not the dog-whistles they stumble into. I see where you'd get the wrong impression, though.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 07:11 PM
1

Answered here: https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/CJgTMvUpPf
/r/MensRights29/04/26 07:04 PM
1

Weird how they're widely celebrated by feminists, call themselves such, and you're literally the only person I've ever seen try and deny them a place in the movement. "No True Scotsman," much? Yet again I ask, do you have even the slightest example of you criticizing feminists at all, much less standing up to them when they repeat sexist talking points about men? To answer your question, no, not all Christians are bad, at least not in the modern day. They have the good grace to roundly argue wit…
/r/MensRights29/04/26 07:04 PM
1

I know, that's why I said bad luck rather than a bad choice. People can't be expected to know all the weird dog-whistles the nazis have come up with these days.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 07:01 PM
1

Are all women feminists? If not, your comparison is a dumbass one, for reasons I pointed out above.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 06:44 PM
1

I've done about all I can, which is donate. Also, when "feminism as an ideology" actively encourages the exact behavior I brought up, well... Just look at poor Erin Pizzey. Literally chased out of the UK by death threats from her feminist peers for daring to suggest a men's DV shelter. Look at celebrated academic feminists like Koss, who actively deny the possibility of male victims and female rapists, but who get lucrative careers teaching gender studies, having their wikipedia scrubbed of thei…
/r/MensRights29/04/26 06:42 PM
1

Bad luck then, I suppose, given the recent symbology.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 06:40 PM
1

Also, out of curiosity, is the 88 in your username a nazi thing or just the year you were born?
/r/MensRights29/04/26 03:42 AM
2

Do you have anything like a source for that first sentence? It's an easier job than some 9 out of 10 "normal" jobs, so I fail to really feel all that bad for consenting adults who choose it. They can have the website delete their nudes iirc, but you're right that anyone who screenshotted them will still have them. That's simply the price of doing business on the internet.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 03:41 AM
2

I said women's empowerment in general, not the empowerment of every single woman. Besides, what's your issue with sex work? I don't see it as inherently negative like that tbh.
/r/MensRights29/04/26 03:16 AM
1

Thing is, "men" is a gender that makes up half the population, while "feminists" are a social advocacy group that claims to work towards equality while never actually doing so, and instead working exclusively towards women's empowerment, even and especially when women are already ahead. I can't help but notice your account history is private, do you have any actual examples of you criticizing misandry among feminists, or even feminists at all?
/r/MensRights29/04/26 02:51 AM
1

Because that strays dangerously into "if you aren't in constant agreement with us, you're literally hitler" tumblr-tier reasoning, and is how people like us lose elections? I'm more inclined to put that one down to ignorance or apathy than malice, myself.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 05:38 AM
1

Does refusing to vote make a person "maga" in your eyes? That's an interesting stance, ngl, coming from someone who voted blue down the ballot.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 05:33 AM
1

No, it didn't. Do you know what "a majority" even is, bud? You're looking at voter numbers, and there were about as many men who didn't vote as voted for any individual party. Same for women, though to a lesser degree as they've out-voted men in every election since the 80s.
/r/MensRights28/04/26 02:07 AM
6

There is a trend towards them being unwilling to work towards equality when women are advantaged over men, though. Not just a trend really, more of a statistical fact that they never do so.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/04/26 01:07 AM
1

It's a normal position for feminists in my experience, and when that label is self-applied by so many, well.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/26 11:32 PM
7

And yet, under this administration, women still have more legal and social rights and privileges than men. There's a reason for that, I think.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/26 11:30 PM
2

Have you tried to do the same thing with women as the target? AI doesn't even allow it, which is a frankly quite funny demonstration of society's general bias on the subject of when it is entertaining for someone to die.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 11:05 PM
1

Nobody is being forced to enslave their own citizens. Enslaving people "for defence" is still enslaving them, go fuck yourself. If the government didn't have the support for a volunteer army, it doesn't deserve to remain, IMO.
/r/MensRights26/04/26 10:03 PM
10

Here's some examples of institutional misandry: the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for i…
/r/MensRights25/04/26 09:22 PM
9

Women have more "basic human rights" and control over their body than men in every wester nation. Misandry is more than just "being laughed at." Here's some examples of institutional misandry: the draft. infant genital mutilation, illegal against women in the US, but some 70% of mothers choose to do it to their sons based on aesthetic preference. the bias in the educational system. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-…
/r/MensRights25/04/26 09:22 PM
2

Actually talking about it, despite how eager you are to stop people from doing so. Please keep up. There's only so much activism I can do from a different continent, but people routinely, even in this very sub, deny outright that this is happening at all. I can at least correct them. Why are you here, if even discussing men's issues raises your hackles this badly?
/r/MensRights25/04/26 06:47 PM
6

Because the person you replied to is the exact type to use that "bad narrative." Search their contributions on the sub if you like, you can still do that by searching their username even if they hide post history.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 06:40 PM
1

Thank goodness, I was so sure I was about to get ligma'd with a "dogma balls" or something, lol.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 12:18 AM
10

https://youtu.be/KXhC8WREVKM?si=hBQ07exo7GxvY_hz https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz994d6vqe5o There's videos of reporters even doing ride-alongs in these vans, though obviously the vans with the reporters in them are careful not to be too zealous in chasing down those men they see who are unwilling to show them conscription status papers. What's so unbelievable about this, to you? Edit: lmao, they blocked me for giving them exactly what they asked for. Hilarious.
/r/MensRights25/04/26 12:03 AM
12

Why would Ukraine report on their own enslavement of their citizens? At least, why would they do it with videos that paint them in a bad light? Because they have been reporting on it. They just say that the conscription efforts are going well. Did you think this isn't what conscription is for an invaded country? They can't exactly lock up draft dodgers like the US did when they enslaved their men for a foreign war. So the draft dodgers get put into the vans, and shipped off to war whether they w…
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:59 PM
14

Okay, now you've got me curious. What "certain duties" do you think women should have that men should not? Personally, I don't agree that anyone should be forced into anything on account of their gender.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:34 PM
43

Why do you come to this subreddit just to downplay the harm against men you see here, and make horrid faith arguments like this?
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:29 PM
18

It's not disinformation if it is true, though. Ukraine really is doing this shit.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:24 PM
25

Plenty? Lmao, they're like 7% of the army and 20% of officers, in positions that never even have to touch the front lines. That's not "plenty." What does being born a woman require? Nothing? They just get handed the same rights as men (more rights than men actually, in the US), with no expectations placed upon them as well? Interesting, interesting.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:23 PM
9

Do you really think those economic systems didn't engage in conscription?
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:19 PM
15

Even you acknowledge that the burden of proof is on you. Why do you still fail to provide any?
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:18 PM
14

Should men not have the right to avoid enslavement? This is a very important men's rights scenario if you ask me.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:17 PM
19

Weird how this government-backed "heroic" slavery only ever applies to one gender, ain't it?
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:16 PM
18

But when a country is only willing to enslave one half of its people and let the other half flee as refugees, we can call out the hypocrisy, no?
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:16 PM
1

Might've been an error? I'm not seeing any dragons dogma at the moment.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:15 PM
19

It's no less awful when Russia does it. Should we just... ignore men being kidnapped and enslaved because it might be seen as pro-russian to point it out?
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:14 PM
49

Are you in Iran?
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:04 PM
62

Feminists say exactly that quite often, or bring up oppression that ended decades before their birth as examples of why women are oppressed today.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 11:04 PM
1

Depends on the playing field in question, to be honest.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 01:35 AM
20

Not only is academic feminism only a part of the movement, it's one of the more sexist parts, considering that academic feminists are the ones who gave Mary P. Koss a lucrative career teaching gender studies at feminist universities and substantial power over US Title IX legislation all on her bogus claim that it's impossible for men to be raped, and impossible for women to rape.
/r/MensRights24/04/26 12:36 AM
20

Mmmhmmm, sure bud. You can't "disprove" feminism or any other advocacy group anyways, what a silly thing to think. Feminism isn't an attempt at systematic analysis, it's an advocacy group for women's empowerment. Not even for gendered equality, going by how they ran Erin Pizzey out of her country with death threats at the mere suggestion of a men's DV shelter. Not going by how they work to widen the gender education gap in the US either, considering that this gap is currently as bad as the one f…
/r/MensRights24/04/26 12:28 AM
10

Probably because you've failed utterly to respond to what I or anyone else with actual data says. Not our fault that you're evidently illiterate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/04/26 12:06 AM
23

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/oY9DpHFaEm Ugh, you're all over this subreddit, too. Do you really think you have anything even slightly relevant to add to the discussion, when the only criticism of feminism you can manage to fathom is that society is "a little mean to men sometimes, in isolated incidents?" Someone this desperate to deny the existence of systemic misandry is not someone that men are safe to be around. Wishing you a swift exit from the lives of those men unlucky enough to k…
/r/MensRights23/04/26 11:51 PM
28

Ugh, another hidden account idiot here to educate us on how we need to interpret scientific findings in such a way as to never find women at fault for anything? At least be original about it, 🙄 Besides, women report committing more IPV than men, too. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1854883/
/r/MensRights23/04/26 11:43 PM
20

As many men are raped per year in the US by women as vice versa, as per the CDC. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, using the non-gender neutral definition of given in the CDC report. However, on page 19 the report states that during that…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 08:00 PM
36

Only feminist groups give their "terrible minority" actual systemic power and lucrative teaching positions, though. See Mary P. Koss and her entire career built on coveing up for female perpetrators and minimizing male victims. Cut it out with the No True Scotsman shit, bad-faith commenter. Toxic women hurt and kill men all the time. Hell, it systemically disatvantages men in the educational system just to start with. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 07:59 PM
23

You're only using the convictions from a biased legal system again, bud. In addition to what the other guy posted that shows the CDC measures as many male victims of women per year as vice versa, you simply must remember that the legal bias exists and is quite well-studied. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/gender-differences-sentencing-felony-offenders "More recently, in 2014, Nick Olivas of Arizona was forced to pay over $15,000 in back-payments to a woman who had sex with hi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 07:53 PM
9

Yes, I did assume that, as it was the only piece of information I was given, and quite likely given my own personal experience with what women have said directly to my face. Welcome to having a conversation, first time? Notice your bias in assuming that those women simply must have dropped me for other teasons? Lol. Well, it's a bit unavoidable when your personal experience is all of 5 women in your entire life (outside of the mutually acknowledged shitty dating apps). As for the study, first of…
/r/MensRights23/04/26 07:51 PM
10

Did you date them as a man, or as a woman? That's extremely important to the conversation, before even considering how pitiful a sample size of only 5 is. Plenty of women who will go on a handful of dates with you and then drop you if you don't pay, and maybe one willing to still make a long-term relationship out of it if you do pay for her sometimes? Mmmhmm, sure bud. Must be geographic differences, somehow I doubt IT work specifically attracts the sort of women who use dates as free meal ticke…
/r/MensRights23/04/26 07:24 PM
28

"The police" in my area also recognize an "epidemic of black people's violence against white people" so that doesn't mean much. The legal system is biased against men in the US, so take anything they say with a hefty handful of salt. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/gender-differences-sentencing-felony-offenders Feminism has disregarded male victims, and actively worked to cover for female perpetrators of crimes like rape. Who do you think wrote the FBI reporting definition th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 07:16 PM
9

Most women are not attracted to "men," going by recent surveys that state the majority of them have no intent to actually date, and only something like 30% hold anything approaching a positive view of men in general. They may be attracted to an individual man's wealth, status, or body, but I don't think it's all that correct to genericize this to them being attracted to men in general.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/04/26 07:11 PM
24

Lmao, how many women have you dated as a man, Mr. Hidden Account History? The last several I did still expected me to pay, despite being in the same industry as me and making shout ad mucu. I didn't pay more than half, but none were happy about it. There's a reason that only some 15% of US women are okay with dating (much less marrying) men who make less than them.
/r/MensRights23/04/26 07:01 PM
1

Why are you here if you "hate men so much" exactly? https://www.reddit.com/r/FeminismUncensored/s/63bxlIYfH3 Seriously, just fuck off. You're happier not interacting with the men in your life and the ones you find online, and I promise they'd be happier if you did so as well.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 09:31 PM
2

Mm, sure, I suppose I see your point on the "not washing their hands and giving everyone e coli" front. Almost definitely not a gender issue, too.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 08:56 PM
1

Okay, that joke in the first paragraph is actually really funny. Credit where credit is due on that one. As for the second paragraph... maybe? Do people even eat these meat sculptures? I guess we'd have to ask OP, but even if it has been sitting for a couple hours it ain't gonna do anything bad to you just from standing in its vicinity. Maybe it's a health-risk to that one person in every office who constantly steals food.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 08:34 PM
3

How does merely being in the vicinity of ground beef put anybody's health at risk, lmao? As long as it wasn't actively rotten or anything, that's a bit dramatic. I do agree that this likely isn't a men's issue though, I doubt a woman who brought in a beef sculpture would be treated any less like an axe-wielding maniac.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 08:13 PM
2

Source cited: "I dislike men, so like, uhhhmmmm, men bad, and every bad thing people say about them is true teehee I'm so smurt."
/r/MensRights22/04/26 07:59 PM
3

Misandry was always prevalent, people only started talking about it now. You're an actual idiot if you think that's "the only time men's issues ever get brought up" I mean you are right fucking here after all. You can't point out systemic inequality without comparisons, and feminists subs constantly talk about men as well.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 07:57 PM
6

You've literally never commented in this sub or any other that I can find in a way that actually supports men's rights. You just constantly whinge that we aren't catering to you enough in this sub. You are exactly the person this comic is about, just FYI.
/r/MensRights22/04/26 07:55 PM
1

Because I expected you to be mentally capable of either coming up with a reply, or correcting the misinformation you attempted to spread. Not quite rocket science, bud.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 08:06 PM
1

And this comment is not really a reply.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 05:39 PM
3

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for identical work, and punished more harshly for identical misbehavior. It's very easily proven, too. Every boy experiences this, at the hands of the over 70% female teaching population.
/r/MensRights21/04/26 01:29 AM
1

Jesus christ, practically everything you say in this post is incorrect. Men are the majority of murder victims by far, and at least half the rape victims, just to start. Are you mentally capable of discussing the rest? If so we can engage on your other points. https://www.consumershield.com/articles/victims-of-violent-crime-by-gender "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270…
/r/MensRights21/04/26 01:26 AM
2

The data supports the opposite, actually, counting paid work. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2013/03/14/modern-parenthood-roles-of-moms-and-dads-converge-as-they-balance-work-and-family/
/r/MensRights21/04/26 01:19 AM
2

Generally, most feminists oppose women being drafted on the grounds that they work on average much more than men without being paid, Lmao, like hell they do. https://www.pewresearch.org/social-trends/2013/03/14/modern-parenthood-roles-of-moms-and-dads-converge-as-they-balance-work-and-family/ Some feminists wants men to be drafted and punished otherwise, but they're a small minority among left-wing activists, so far as I can tell. You are not paying much attention to how feminists in general int…
/r/MensRights21/04/26 01:13 AM
4

Those lifetime stats are bunk, as many men are raped per year every year by women as vice versa. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, using the non-gender neutral definition of given in the CDC report. However, on page 19 the report states …
/r/MensRights21/04/26 01:01 AM
3

I didnt get what you asked me exactly Where is the confusion? It's a question so simple even someone like you should be able to answer it. exactly but someone calling themselves "feminist" then saying insult and disrespectful shit dosent tarnish for me the movement She isn't just calling herself a feminist. She's one of the most widely-lauded academic feminists around, and has gained a very cushy career and much renown among feminists for the shit she says. feminism wants equal rights Simply inc…
/r/MensRights18/04/26 07:59 PM
0

There we go. Knew you had some self-awareness in there somewhere. As for your first comment, do bad actors among feminists, ones that get profitable careers teaching gender studies at feminist universities like Mary P. Koss on claims that it's "laughably impossible" for men to be victims of rape at all, much less rape by women, also tarnish your view of that movement, or is that a standard you exclusively hold men and those who care about their rights to?
/r/MensRights18/04/26 06:51 PM
1

I'm aware that it's not "about" this sub, but c'mon. Even you must see the irony.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 06:02 PM
1

Had to check. We've been getting a lot more randoms showing up to say dumb shit like that than usual, lately.
/r/MensRights18/04/26 12:47 AM
2

Sarcasm or bait?
/r/MensRights18/04/26 12:24 AM
11

If you're going to brigade the sub, you could at least have the common decency not to label yourself as an intruder? It's like hunting ducks covered in running Christmas lights, it aint as fun.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 11:53 PM
1

Without even a single solitary example, even you have to see why nobody here is actually going to believe that, given the fact that feminists repeat the "MRA is a hate group" talking point constantly. It's no less specific than the "criticism" you insist on regularly spweing in places like this. I've looked through the search bar with relevant keywords on your account, and I can find literally 0 criticism of feminism or feminists for any reason. Unrelated, but that's actually a solid idea for an…
/r/MensRights17/04/26 07:43 PM
1

Please answer the "one more question," if you ever want to have anyone even halfway believe the shit you say about being an egalitarian.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 07:09 PM
3

Then they shouldn't have called it the body positivity movement, if the body positivity is only applied to those with female bodies. Many of the biggest proponents claimed the movement was egalitarian too, while simultaneously turning around and showing their hypocritical asses at the first opportunity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 06:55 PM
4

Do you know what "brigading" is in a social media context? It's when people en-masse anonymously show up in a sub to say stupid shit in order to try and derail conversation. Often organized, but not always. Hallmarks of the practice are your exact variety of dumbass contrarianism and hidden account history.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 06:54 PM
1

Generalising people of ANY group like they're all the exact same is toxic and false. Then why do you only criticize when people generalize one specific group? Oh wait, you didn't even do that, you criticized people for being in the same room as people who allegedly generalized that one group. Again, is this a double standard on your end? Examples are required, if you say it is not.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 06:46 PM
1

I keep my account history hidden because I've had people stalk and harass me in the past, if you're that desperate to know. Mmm-hmm, that's what the other brigadiers usually say, too. Y'all have a script, or is this more disorganized? I'm not ignoring that women can be toxic and awful people like everyone else, my point is that there is a difference between criticising those bad people and talking about a group in general. And has that line been crossed here? No? Then you're just vague-posting a…
/r/MensRights17/04/26 06:44 PM
4

You know what, fair enough. Usually, I'd ask for more relevant studies on the subject before taking someone at their word for this kind of statement, but that's a very convincing explanation as to why this wouldn't reasonably exist. Thanks for the info, interesting to consider for sure!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 05:45 PM
5

Because your questions were fucking stupid, even by the standards of all the other hidden account history brigadiers we get on this sub.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 04:31 AM
16

Men are sexually assaulted as often as women, in the US. What equality movement? Never was one. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, using the non-gender neutral definition of given in the CDC report. However, on page 19 the report states t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 04:30 AM
4

If you replied to me, the reply ain't showing up any more. Maybe try again?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 04:17 AM
2

Did anyone say "all" of anyone does anything?
/r/MensRights17/04/26 03:57 AM
8

I was mostly asking about your confident assertion that women find their attraction to their partner's non-physical attributes increasing over time in non-OLD contexts, but I still have issues with the study you've given. It falls into the exact same stated vs revealed preferences trap as most other studies on the subject: it assumes that women won't tailor their answers in order to appear less shallow, especially under a prevailing cultural narrative that tries to paint them as inherently so.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/04/26 01:47 AM
2

Actually, one more question. Do you ever make that "blanket statements about ideologies is bad!!" talking point when feminist call anyone who dares to advocate for the rights of men a hate group? If so, can you give even one single example of you doing so?
/r/MensRights17/04/26 01:32 AM
3

Not the same. Just similar enough that there are prevailing threads, in this case of bigotry despite claims towards egalitarianism. And nothing of value was lost. You didn't defend her directly, but feminism sure as hell has lionised her at every oppurtunity. Kindly never come back, we don't need any limp-wristed "oh male victimization is surely bad... buuutt haaaave you thought about how woommmmeeeen have it sooooo muuuuuch woooorssseee!?!?" types here.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 01:31 AM
2

Sure I am, bud. The best you could come up with for the entirety of gendered oppression was a blatantly biased study that made some faulty conclusions about male vs female SA victimization. Then, you accused me of goalpost-shifting when I corrected you. Others sure as hell have, though. And you have, predictably, failed. Please keep up.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 01:16 AM
2

Women are the ones who wrote the damn definition. Well, unless men were part of the Women's Law Group, which seems unlikely. Who the hell else am I supposed to attribute it to, bud? Besides, I never said that only Women contribute to hostile gendered norms (a far better term than the dumbass "patriarchy" considering its upheld by as many women as men and seems to benefit women far more, at least in the US), where did you read that? "Non-radical feminism" does all the same shit. Don't forget the …
/r/MensRights17/04/26 01:14 AM
14

Lol, "the people who have fully researched it" think every single fantasy fetish video on the internet is equivalent to a snuff film. They're blatantly trying to rile you up into even more misandrist fervor than you seem to constantly exist in, and it quite clearly worked.
/r/MensRights17/04/26 12:55 AM
2

It's all feminism, all the same. There's a reason that Mary P. Koss was able to make a profitable career teaching gender studies at feminist institutions and influencing US Title IX policy despite claiming on multiple occasions that SA of men is impossible, and SA of men by women is "laughable." She's even called "a renowned expert on gendered violence" by wikipedia and near-universally accepted by feminists across the spectrum to this day, they bury her more controversial statements in a sub-fo…
/r/MensRights17/04/26 12:51 AM
1

Not an opinion, just a simple fact. Frankly, sometimes I wonder why we don't ban the most obvious concern-trolls and outright liars such as yourself like most feminist subs do with men entirely, but I understand that would be bad for optics. Some people deserve hostility for their blatantly biased and bigoted statements and stances. You've dragged your feet and reluctantly provided sources... that are almost always either misinterpreted, or blatantly biased in both your reading and the original …
/r/MensRights17/04/26 12:47 AM
1

They do that because according to US legal definitions of rape re-written for the FBI in the early 2010s by the Women's Law Project, it's only rape if the offender has a dick. It wasn't great before, but they very specifically worded the reporting definitions in order to minimize the prevalence of male victims of women. Look into it. You're only looking at lifetime victimization rates, dear Unconvincing Egalitarian. There's a reason that my linked paper used the 12-month victimization rate. The …
/r/MensRights17/04/26 12:43 AM
22

Never said it was, but if you want to make confident and quite frankly ridiculous claims about why people are going to the porn website and be believed about them, you've gotta do better than this. Hundreds of thousands of comments? Really? Poor thing, not even you believe that, surely. It's fantasy fetish content, do you think the men in latex tied to their beds on pornhub were all kidnapped off the street, too? But they have comments about how to properly tie knots so the submissives victims c…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 11:53 PM
9

Also, why is your account history hidden? Are you another birgadier? I swear, for how often the feminism subs complain about this stuff, y'all are real fuckin' eager to do it yourselves.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/26 11:30 PM
1

Why do you people always hide your comment history, by the way? None of you contrarian dipshits who are so eager to cite biased reporting stats ever seem willing to give a concrete answer.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 11:15 PM
1

The FBI uses only conviction stats from a provably biased legal system. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/gender-differences-sentencing-felony-offenders And beyond that, their rape definition requires penetration, handily ignoring the rape that women most commonly do to men. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 11:14 PM
24

If you think the body positivity movement actually helped any men, you might be dumb as hell, sorry. I mean, just look at how utterly blasé and even cheered on it is to insult men by some aspect of their physical characteristics. "Small dick, balding, fatty" all insults regularly used towards men by the same exact men and women who freak the hell our about body positivity when men decide that they're not attracted to fat women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/26 10:59 PM
8

Anything like an actual source for that last paragraph?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/04/26 10:56 PM
24

How many of those videos do you think didn't actually have the women's consent? It's very difficult to make porn without that, and you've failed utterly to convince me that they did so.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 10:54 PM
2

Hidden account history? ✅️ Every comment you've made on this sub is either being contrarian and ignoring actual facts so you can disagree with OP, or just accusing them of misogyny outright? ✅️ Lots of claims towards being an egalitarian, but you have no actual egalitarian talking points anywhere I can find? ✅️ Seems incapable of separating criticism of feminism from criticism of women? ✅️ Bot, bait, or brigadier folks, call it.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 10:45 PM
1

You have failed utterly to thoughtfully address the concerns of more than half the people who replied. You just confidently assert statistically unprovable shit and pretend it's proof. Do better, or buzz off. Meh, your comment doesn't do shit for the discussion either, especially since it's deliberately without anything like actual sources for your claims. I'm frankly not convinced that people like you are fully capable of learning at all, going by your account history and historical complete in…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 10:25 PM
1

My own experience as a bi man, to start with. Do you have any sources that show that lesbians are in any way actually as put-upon by society as you claim? Maybe source your own shit to start before asking other people to do the same. That same survey in previous years has found complete parity in perpetration and victimization between men and women. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it s…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 10:22 PM
1

Just gonna ignore the response to this comment? Seems like you aren't mentally capable of talking about it, so sad 🤭
/r/MensRights16/04/26 09:33 PM
3

What gender makes up 80% of homicide victims?
/r/MensRights16/04/26 09:32 PM
3

Straight women fetishize and harrass gay men. You've never been a man dating another man, and it shows. Source on women not being as oppressive? Why are you pretending every man who dares to speak up against mistreatment of men is ignoring reality? Why man-splain men's own experiences to them?
/r/MensRights16/04/26 09:31 PM
5

"Most most most" of those crimes that are convicted have men as the ones punished. You're failing to see the legal bias and it's affects on the stats you think you know. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/gender-differences-sentencing-felony-offenders "More recently, in 2014, Nick Olivas of Arizona was forced to pay over $15,000 in back-payments to a woman who had sex with him when he was 14. She was 20 years old at the time." https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-abou…
/r/MensRights16/04/26 09:28 PM
1

This is monumentally sexist against basically every gender identity I can think of in one way or another, lmao. Sorry you're stuck with shit for relatives.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/04/26 09:11 PM
13

Mary P. Koss made a career teaching gender studies at feminist institutions off exactly that claim, and has gotten quite a lot of praise from mainstream feminists. Never anything even approaching genuine criticism, the best is limp-wristed hand wringing about the optics of her repeated claims that it's impossible for men to be victimized.
/r/MensRights16/04/26 09:05 PM
–

Source cited: "uhhmm uhh mmmm I saw a mean comment on the internet, once! They're like, not directly centering women in their lives??? Must be because they're bitter about being rejected, and so that must mean they're all entitled rapacious bastards! I'm so smart 🤭"
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/26 08:58 PM
1

Yup. Shame we live in a world that works the way it does, but we do. Not much to be done about it really, I think certain issues like this are fundamentally unsolvable, given the differences in how both halves of the population see each other.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/04/26 09:29 PM
15

Do you care to elaborate on what, specifically, those percentages mean in this context?
/r/MensRights15/04/26 07:31 PM
17

This isn't about biological attraction, it's about basic goodwill and empathy towards half the population.
/r/MensRights15/04/26 07:24 PM
23

The UN Women's group decrees that a country is equal, but only if women are equal or advantaged over men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/04/26 09:34 PM
2

You don't. You wait to actually read and form your opinion before commenting. This is basic internet etiquette stuff, bud 🤭 If this is what it looks like when you attempt to have a discussion, I feel bad for the people who know you IRL, men especially. You have quite repeatedly proved me correct in my assumptions about you, sorry you're unhappy about that.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 11:29 PM
2

You asked me for sources. You seemingly have not read them, and your claim that you plan to is flimsier than the average tissue paper. This is what I mean when I tell you you've been making a concerted effort to be ignorant. You do not deserve grace, not after your performance in this comment section. You can improve though, at least in theory, so there is that!
/r/MensRights13/04/26 11:02 PM
4

You are biased, and it is because of your inexperience and general concerted effort to stay ignorant on the subject, yes. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15491274/ Women have an extreme in-group bias, and men actually have a small out-group bias. That's why the gendered sentencing disparity exists too, btw. "More recently, in 2014, Nick Olivas of Arizona was forced to pay over $15,000 in back-payments to a woman who had sex with him when he was 14. She was 20 years old at the time." https://www.…
/r/MensRights13/04/26 09:28 PM
2

I think this app (and the whole website, for that matter) is a piece of shit held together with duct tape and hope, and not enough of either IMO. You assumed... people would do the digging to prove your own accusations for you, or just believe you outright because the person you accused was a man? Interesting stance, though in line with your others on the subject. Mmm, the details on Schachners accusation are extremely vague, and I refuse to use a second-hand inconclusive text conversation as th…
/r/MensRights13/04/26 08:57 PM
2

Unfortunately, the reddit app has stopped allowing me to directly quote comments I reply to. Assume paragraphs correlate directly in order, not counting this one. See, there's the same unsourced accusation I was talking about, yet again. Do you have any links to accusations of him doing this, or are you keeping those to yourself since the accusations are obviously not credible? Yes. If I had just gotten done with a night of schmoozing around with some guy and he took me up to his hotel room, I'd…
/r/MensRights13/04/26 08:28 PM
3

Yeah, the CDC has been regularly trying to shift their reporting definitions and data collection methods to prop up unrealistic narratives about male victims. It's inevitable given the gender bias of the space they exist in generally, sadly.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 08:18 PM
2

Re-replying since the last one seems to have been deleted for some reason: Looks like brigadier is more likely at this point, rarely are bots so limp wristed in their own self-defence. It's not predatory behavior to ask for consent and then act on the answer that you receive, and it isn't "disagreeing with predatory behavior" to repeatedly and completely without any sort of source accuse predatory behavior, which is what you've done. Please keep up, most obvious plant I've ever seen. The issues …
/r/MensRights13/04/26 08:15 PM
37

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for identical work, and punished more harshly for identical misbehavior. It's very easily proven, too. That's what happens when this rhetoric is given special importance by an over 70% female teaching industry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/04/26 07:49 PM
5

Hidden post history? ✅️ All the comments I can find from them on the entirety of this sub amount to basic unsourced opposition to whatever OP is saying? ✅️ A username that's clearly trying to make them seem less sexist? ✅️ Stating outright that they think women should get more sick days than their male coworkers for having a period? ✅️ Bot or brigadier folks, place your bets now.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 07:35 PM
8

Lmao, if you think this is functionally the case in practice, you might just be stupid. Sorry you had to learn it here, but when HR is dominated by women, they're not going to hold women to the same standards they hold men to. It's just a simple fact of life, women have a statistically massive in-group bias for gendered matters, especially compared to men. Want a source? It's quite well-studied.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 07:27 PM
2

Here's a link if anyone wants proof. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1854883/
/r/MensRights13/04/26 06:44 PM
2

Women commit some 70% of non-reciprocal DV too, which is... something. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1854883/
/r/MensRights13/04/26 06:42 PM
8

They make up about half the offenders, when you use gender-neutral definitions of SA. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, using the non-gender neutral definition of given in the CDC report. However, on page 19 the report states that during…
/r/MensRights13/04/26 06:37 PM
1

That guy didn't even mention Trump? What's the deal? Do you think him merely acknowledging the existence of false accusations is him claiming that every accusation is false?
/r/MensRights13/04/26 06:36 PM
3

Are you "most women?" Besides, if you live in the US, what privilege does a man have that you lack, seriously? Women in my country have more legal rights, more public aid and gender-specific financial assistance, they make up a minority of the homeless population but have the most shelters, etc.
/r/MensRights13/04/26 06:34 PM
6

Even the most common cases people use it for are utterly divorced from reality. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, using the non-gender neutral definition of given in the CDC report. However, on page 19 the report states that during that …
/r/EverydayMisandry13/04/26 06:08 PM
3

The amount of sane-washing people do for sexist women on the internet is insane, tbh.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/04/26 06:01 PM
8

Funny how the countries consistently called "most gender equal" by the UN Women's groups are all ones that deport Ukrainian men and only men back into the meat grinder that they managed to get refugee status when leaving.
/r/MensRights11/04/26 07:18 PM
7

Give us your takeaway Einstein, not the one from the bot that's algorithmically encouraged to find women to never be at fault for abuse of men, and to repeatedly claim that the abuse of men is less severe than that of women, even when the stats obviously do not support it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/26 07:14 PM
6

Wow, legendary crashout. I didn't even accuse them of using dogwhistles lmao, just of failing to recognize the one they were defending. Poor thing had a whole tantrum about it too, that's impressive. I've said way less stupid shit on this sub and gotten a temp ban over it, it'll be genuinely hilarious if they let that comment stay up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/04/26 02:52 AM
4

Yes. The UK does that, and the US actually does it as well for the FBI's rape reporting definition, while the CDC's surveys show that rape victimization and perpetration is basically identical along gender lines. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give relia…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/26 10:38 PM
10

Why do you people literally always bring out the "okay but like, it isn't at all as bad when it happens to men, obviousl6" shit whenever you feel like someone has shown you that you're being hypocritical? Is this your first time interacting with the concept of a dogwhistle? Edit: lmao, and there's the respond and block dance. Oh well, anyone who has read this far, please let me know if anything they said is worth opening an incognito tab to look at.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/04/26 10:33 PM
20

It was funny seeing this posted in the different psych subs and seeing people predictably try and spin this to be men's fault (or deserved, because husbands allegedly kill more wives than vice versa), lmao.
/r/MensRights10/04/26 02:29 AM
3

Can't explicitly name it for reddit "no brigading" reasons, but it has to deal with bookshelves and detectives, I think.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/04/26 01:31 AM
10

Any examples from here you can link that are half as bigoted as the ladies in the screenshots?
/r/MensRights10/04/26 12:18 AM
1

Bud, if you want to start throwing stones over minor grammatical mistakes, you should at least take into account the glass house you live in, given this comment and your serial butchering of the ellipse. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/DlpsXT7TSF
/r/MensRights08/04/26 08:46 PM
2

The ignorance was obviously about gender. Female victims are not this consistently ignored. Are you high? Simply deciding not to be an organ donor is not declaring war for peace, that's a dumbass thing to say. And some people have shit intentions and refuse to think things through, such as yourself. 🤭 Edit: oooo, think I got a respond-and-block for that one. Anyone reading this lmk if they said anything interesting enough to open an incognito tab and check.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 08:36 PM
1

When those overworked and incompetent agencies provably act more "overworked and incompetent" when someone has the gall to suggest a boy might be a victim, it isn't jumping to conclusions to see this through a "male victim" lense, especially considering that the victim was male, and these people would absolutely not be equivalently likely to victimize girls.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 08:34 PM
1

Who failed you during your education? You vastly and regularly over-state they existence.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 07:33 PM
13

Hidden account history? ✅️ Absurd double standards? ✅️ Accusatory tone? ✅️ Bait or brigadier, call it.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 03:13 AM
2

Not particularly practically. Laws that would make it impossible to descriminate against a female applicant due to her gender never really come into play when male applicants are discarded due to theirs.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 01:43 AM
1

Oh fun, an unsubstantiated accusation that this subreddit is frequently regressive. Haven't ever heard that one before. 🙄 Notably, only one gender is immediately suspected of pedophilia should they attempt to step into those roles. There's a reason for that.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 01:36 AM
7

Free choice is the important part of this comment, that is importantly not present in the above parenting strategy.
/r/MensRights08/04/26 01:33 AM
1

Your summarization sucked and distinctly left out the most major parts of each comment you attempted to summarize. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/s/S1YNgqHX65 Again, that poster has this as their only comment on the sub that I can find, and they were one of the most controversial comments in the entire section, on my end.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/26 11:46 PM
3

So, the above comment was correct? There was an uproar over this, and you acknowledge it was a bad thing? Christ, you tried to dodge the point so hard that you accidentally completely agreed, lmao.
/r/MensRights06/04/26 11:10 PM
1

You clearly didn't read the comments. Seriously, how could you get that from those responses? The first comment is trying to deflect onto a different issue entirely, and the second is stating that they think its impossible to communicate with men entirely, so why bother not being sexist? You're clearly reading that shit in deliberately bad faith. The comment you quote directly is not one I can find using the search bar. Is that a direct quote?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/26 10:30 PM
1

Look at how feminist thinkers treat SA. Or have you never heard the old "98% of rapists are male, with female victims" chestnut? That is only around because feminists manipulated federal reporting definitions for SA in the early 2010s so that female on male SA is functionally impossible, despite victimization survey stats painting a far different picture. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC repor…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/26 10:26 PM
1

Seems like a stretch to call the things you brought up evidence, too, but who's counting. We'll see if I end up getting around to reading the Luxemburg person. Your "commodification of feminism" point would hold water if any early feminist literature on the subject of male issues was worth the paper it's written on, but it ain't, and so it don't. You experience a very positive feminism because you are evidently very comfortable ignoring male-specific issues. It's not rocket science. Your perspec…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/04/26 01:16 AM
1

And the comments all hated it, is the point. They all see it as wretched policing of women's right to express their Comfort Bigotry. Like seriously, not a single actual participant of that sub agrees with OP, the only assenting voices are ones that aren't there often, and they're all downvoted.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/26 11:59 PM
2

Granted, it's only by comparison, but feminism does still have substantially more power in every advocacy space than us (and all the legal ones, considering that groups like the Women's Law Project are responsible for writing criminal reporting definitions that minimize women's SA abuses of men), and since they call us a hate group at every single oppurtunity, well... Besides, you give your group too much credit. Going historically, the files would be released... with Ghislaine Maxwell's name co…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/26 11:56 PM
1

I won't deny being petty, but the accurate username is still accurate. I don't hate you, but a performance as poor and extensive as yours in this comment section does not deserve politeness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/26 10:16 PM
2

"She can't be misandrist, she has a husband" ain't the statement you think it is, and besides that a single man does not a varied perspective make. Granted, I haven't read anything by Luxemburg. Not surprising you can't figure it out, but still a bit disappointing. I've never once seen any genuine criticism towards feminism from feminist literature that takes into account a (non-doormat) male perspective, just a lot of lip-service.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/04/26 10:14 PM
1

I mean, last I read something around a percent or two of the population is trans. In what way is that being shoved into anyobody's face? It's just acknowledged as a possibility, and historically speaking there have been quite a few examples that suggest the phenomenon ain't new.
/r/MensRights05/04/26 10:09 PM
9

That sub is just the worst, literally everything on a bookshelf is evidence of misogyny to them, if the shelf might theoretically be owned by a man.
/r/EverydayMisandry04/04/26 08:53 PM
2

Really? Could've sworn last I checked the stats had something a bit north of 40% of modern US marriages ending in divorce, when counting even the non-first-time marriages. Granted, it's been a while since then and I might've misinterpreted the data, though.
/r/MensRights03/04/26 05:25 AM
2

More like podcasts in general having pretty thin margins if they aren't uber-popular, I'd guess.
/r/MensRights02/04/26 10:57 PM
8

"I'm not spreading hate, just saying that I agree with that hate and explaining why other people should feel the same way!" Lol.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/04/26 10:49 PM
5

I think any guide that doesn't acknowledge the reality of the situation and ignores how something like half of marriages end in divorce (overwhelmingly at the woman's behest) would be a damn shitty guide. Haven't watched this video yet, though.
/r/MensRights02/04/26 08:58 PM
1

Ah, it wasn't? Someone should tell OP that you know the topic of their post better than they do, then 🤭 Nothing here gives such strong indications that they were exclusively talking about personal relationships, especially when the largest examples are state-enforced, such as gendered combat slavery. Lmao, we both know you said far more sexist shit in that comment than just criticizing the post's title. Don't play dumb, you can hide your account history but all the comments are still there for a…
/r/MensRights01/04/26 09:36 PM
1

Because it entirely ignores the many, many ways men protect you daily and which you take for granted. Honestly, it doesn't even touch the top 10 most sexist shit I've seen a woman say in this subreddit, but it did prompt me to look at what else you've had to say on this subreddit. Poor thing, you clearly still don't see the problem. Oh well, lord willing any men unlucky or stupid enough to interact with you will see the type of person you are eventually.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 09:09 PM
1

Nope, but you certainly act entitled to their work, at a much higher rate than men act entitled to sex from women. Please keep up, if you're mentally capable of doing so 🤦‍♂️ Not really, no. That protection is enforced at legal and societal levels, see the draft and women collectively agreeing that men should speak up on their behalf against misogyny. I didn't have to scroll very far at all, it was one of the first results when I searched your username, bigot. "I can't be misandrist, I have a hu…
/r/MensRights01/04/26 08:20 PM
0

Not according to the Olympic shooting records (especially considering how much less often women compete in those sports, the medlas they have gotten are relatively impressive), and not according to the experience of anyone I've ever spoken to on the subject who actually went through military basic training with women. They're a bit less able to handle automatic fire when unsupported by something like a bipod, but they consistently do a bit better than the average man for precision sniping work, …
/r/MensRights01/04/26 08:05 PM
1

No, they haven't. They fought for the option to serve in combat roles, and very conveniently ignored any sort of advocacy on the front of which gender has a legal obligation to serve in combat roles should the state deem it prudent. It makes plenty of sense. They may be able to carry less, but they're just as capable of shooting a gun or manning an artillery position as men are. Modern warfare has largely moved past the need for exceptional physical strength, especially with regards to interesti…
/r/MensRights01/04/26 07:54 PM
1

Ans women also do not want women in combat roles, as you can see from the widespread female flight from Ukraine while their male peers are fed into the meatgrinder at gunpoint, even if they got out and sought refugee status from supposedly egalitarian EU nations. That would be the case... if women actually also protected the vulnerable in cases where they have the upper hand, such as the educational industry or in social activism spaces. This does not happen, the expectation for the strong to pr…
/r/MensRights01/04/26 07:44 PM
4

Men working the jobs that cause them to be some 80% of serious workplace injuries could be considered to be protecting you from both the consequences of those jobs not being done, and having to work those jobs yourself. When you claim to have "had a lot of sex" like this, do you understand how unconvincing it sounds? https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/nuCpPLvtuK Yuck, you're the kind of woman to claim you know more about dating as a man than men do, too. Just a reminder to everyone, when an i…
/r/MensRights01/04/26 07:31 PM
5

Thing is, the phenomenon is not exclusive to partners. Just look at shit like the draft, and the general sentiment among women that if you aren't actively going out of your way to protect women physically and emotionally as a man, you're a sexist pig.
/r/MensRights01/04/26 07:21 PM
1

And yet, you still assume you know anything like enough to make such a confident assertion of their feelings towards sex and relationships. You think that generalizing based on your limited and likely incorrectly identified personal experience is anything but the idiocy that it is. There's a reason for that, and you certainly will not be doing the self-reflection necessary to figure out what it is. Do better, or get out, but certainly don't try and explain what men's rights are to men as a woman…
/r/MensRights01/04/26 07:19 PM
2

Meh, maybe I would if there was anything in your comment except simple deflection for the purpose of giving a sexist woman far more credit than she is due. I swear, some people who come to this sub really think that the sexism is "like, so totally different when women I agree with sometimes do it!" It's always the ones with their entire account history hidden too, do you think it isn't obvious what kind of person you are?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/26 06:34 PM
1

So, what you're saying is that you know I'm correct, and you'd prefer to try and deflect from the actual conversation at hand rather than defend your obviously biased statement? Predictable. You would've at least linked the video if you thought you were correct, and you know it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/26 06:22 PM
0

From your experience... not being a man, and simply assuming shit about the random men unlucky enough to exist in your life? Tracks. Christ, what is it about some women that makes them think their inexperience makes them an expert on men and how men feel?
/r/MensRights01/04/26 06:20 PM
1

I haven't watched that one, but 20 bucks says she's still notably misandrist in it, and only self-reflects in a vain effort to be less critical of women who get into age-gap relationships.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/26 06:12 PM
33

Nobody has "whipped" anyone, even metaphorically. Simply showed how shitty and sexist their talking points are.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/04/26 04:35 AM
0

Why shouldn't people be able to change their gender, should they so choose? We have all the technology and they by definition could only possibly harm themselves (which they don't seem to be, most studies I've seen show better mental health outcomes post-transition) in doing this, so why not?
/r/MensRights01/04/26 01:53 AM
1

Well, the women who are really desperate for kids should theoretically be able to divorce the poor schmucks who married them, and get all the financial support without any of the shitty marriage, so it probably sounds like a good idea from where they sit.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/03/26 06:51 PM
0

Ah, so what you're saying is yes, that's exactly who you are? Presumably that's why you hise your comment history from this sub then, as you don't want people drawing the connection correctly? Gosh people like you are fuckin' weird.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/26 11:57 PM
1

"Then society should be striving for a world that discourages it, rather than enforces it." Did you mean to say "encourage" in this comment or something? Also, answer the question, are you the person always downplaying misandry and trying to gatekeep what counts as misandry on this sub as a woman? I tried to check your account history, but you have all your comments from this sub hidden, presumably so people won't recognize that it's you when you repeat the same shit you always do.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/26 11:56 PM
13

By manipulating the power structures around those men, usually either the educational or legal system. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for identical work, and punished more harshly for identical misbehavior. It's very easily proven, too. Same goes for the legal system, which p…
/r/MensRights30/03/26 11:49 PM
0

Also, are you the one always commenting on this sub as a woman about how a given post "isn't really misandrist" as if you wouldn't lose your shit at a man gatekeeping what is and is not misogyny?
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/26 11:45 PM
2

A society that discourages the type of human connection in question is a very short-lived society indeed, doomed to die out within a generation or 3 as people stop having kids. Again, I might be a bit of a hypocrite on this front as I never want anything to do with having or caring for children of my own, but why would you say that this should be how it works? Seems ill-advised in the long term.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/26 11:43 PM
1

Discourages... what, exactly? Sorry, having a bit of trouble understanding what you mean in context.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/26 11:35 PM
16

What institutional power does the average man hold, exactly? Women have voted more often than men in every US election since the 80s, so surely they're just as much to blame for those men being in power as the average man is. Again, fuck do you mean "control money?" Women literally control 85% of US consumer spending, as I've informed you. Lmao, in what way is the average man dominating economically? Proportionally speaking the gap between male and female homeless people is larger than the one b…
/r/MensRights30/03/26 10:17 PM
18

A group doesn't have to "dominate almost all spheres of life" to substantially effect society's treatment of other groups, you absolute dust rag of a person. Besides, on average women do have more economical power than men, they make up 85% of US consumer spending, after all. Brother, you're the one who repeatedly insisted that men's issues are never caused by women. Just one single example to the contrary and you already start frothing at the mouth? I'd call it hilarious if it wasn't so disappo…
/r/MensRights30/03/26 08:28 PM
31

Men in general do not have any systemic power. Are you high? Also, are you ignoring all the problems perpetuated and caused by women, such as the women in control of the 70+% female teaching industry? https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for identical work, and punished more harshl…
/r/MensRights30/03/26 08:04 PM
18

Meh, it's integrated enough with all the EEA stuff, and it's not like EU countries haven't also done this or worse to male Ukrainian refugees.
/r/MensRights30/03/26 06:44 PM
3

Is there something about the show specifically built to draw in the worst kind of people, or is it just a coincidence? Been curious since I noticed the phenomenon, but not quite enough to watch what sounds to me like the least interesting television imagineable.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/26 05:01 PM
4

It's the closest anything like a modern mainstream feminist writer has ever gotten to not being sexist as fuck, and it's still pretty damn awful.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 04:57 PM
12

Why is it that like, 95% of that show's fans in my experience are extraordinarily sexist?
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/26 04:15 PM
2

Feminists are a powerful group in the west that frequently claim to be oppressed by the less socially and legally privileged (on average) male demographic, though? How are you so close to understanding, but still unwilling to do so?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 04:08 PM
3

Books all written by women who coincidentally seem to never interact with men as if they're intellectual equals, much less actually ask them about the subjects at hand. Books that are still near-universally disagreed with by modern feminists even for the limp-wristed criticism they gave.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 04:06 PM
1

Funny how accurate that "flimsy" username is, couldn't respond to any of the genuine criticism of this comment. Completely typical, yet still disappointing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 03:41 PM
5

Not morally, obviously. Gonna do weird things to the age demographics of many nations going forward though, and there are economic consequences of this. Just ask the South Koreans.
/r/EverydayMisandry30/03/26 07:42 AM
1

Yeah. This post is the closest either of us were able to find in all their account history to anything like criticism of feminists to their faces. So, that's says something about them.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 02:15 AM
6

I didn't dismiss shit. Just said that they've always happily accepted male assistance, promising the same in exchange but never actually delivering. Quite the opposite, in fact. Things sucked for women in the past, that's why feminism, a movement exclusively for women's empowerment, was necessary to work towards equality. Now that women are ahead in the west in every measurable way, however? Not so much. Getting them to acknowledge male issues is like pulling teeth. Getting them to care in a sub…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/03/26 02:13 AM
1

Like clockwork. This wasn't even one of the specific ones I was thinking of when I made the comment, lol.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/03/26 12:45 AM
2

Hah, ain't that the truth. I made the comment in the hopes of riling multiple of them up into replying, so shhh 🤫
/r/EverydayMisandry28/03/26 10:29 PM
8

Bud, your username is a hunger games reference with a misspelling. That ship has sailed. Looks like I was correct on the bait front, then, at any rate.
/r/MensRights28/03/26 10:21 PM
10

Sometimes, the people who write the dictionary are simply correct. If you live in the west, you do not live in a male supremacy. Tell me your country, and I'll tell you what legal rights women have that you do not, and you won't be able to come up with anything for the reverse. Promise. As for the last paragraph, are you an idiot? Please be honest. The entire history of feminism is just them taking all the male assistance they can get, and using it exclusively for the furtherment of women's stat…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/26 10:20 PM
2

The newer feminism take is this post. Basically the lightest possible requests for them to be less sexist, and the response to it, with the person who made the post still having the gall to come here and call themselves a feminist after seeing the shit they are agreeing with by doing so. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/s/Cfmadaf96V If the best you can do under a feminist framework is tell men to ignore all the work men have done to help women and fix their problems themselves, you are wors…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/26 10:16 PM
5

Please, your comments ain't neutral. Anyone with eyes can see that, stop pretending otherwise.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/26 10:12 PM
5

Hah! Listen to criticism? Here's how the mildest of them interact with the most limp-wristed criticism of their terminology around male issues possible, not even asking them from a place of morality, just of optics. They still lose their shit when informed that it probably isn't a good idea to say directly sexist shit. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/s/Cfmadaf96V
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/03/26 10:09 PM
3

Can't wait to see the one dumb fuck who always comes into these comment sections to try and claim that these "aren't really sexist you guys, you can tell by [misrepresentation of the things on their screen so major that you wonder if the commenter is a bot or a lobotomy patient]."
/r/EverydayMisandry28/03/26 10:04 PM
7

Go to r/teachers . Or just, y'know, interact with the average teacher. The majority of them are like this, and it informs their bias agaisnt boys in general. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for identical work, and punished more harshly for identical misbehavior. It's very easi…
/r/MensRights28/03/26 10:01 PM
6

Hidden account history? ✅️ Deliberately inflammatory and honestly stupid comment? ✅️ First comment on the sub? ✅️ Bot, brigadier, or bait. I'm guess bait, for this one.
/r/MensRights28/03/26 10:00 PM
1

You might be a bit daft if you think every other economic system ever attempted hasn't had the same (or worse) problems. You overestimate the true availability of resources, and vastly underestimate the entrenched nature of sexism within any system that would replace capitalism.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/03/26 05:45 AM
1

Bait then, that tracks. Thanks for the answer!
/r/MensRights26/03/26 05:52 PM
3

Ugh, I hate that "no, we were just jooooking! Obviously it doesn't count when we say sexist shit, we would never do anything bad! Yes, it is totally different when we rehash fucking 4chan arguments!" talking point. So annoying. It's sexist no matter who does it, IMO.
/r/MensRights26/03/26 04:59 AM
3

Did my other reply to this post get deleted? Am I the only one who can see it? Sorry, the message for it just showed up a bit oddly on my end.
/r/MensRights26/03/26 03:39 AM
8

Something becomes misogyny when it stops being a criticism of a specific woman or group and starts being a sweeping insult/generalization of women as a whole. Same as misandry, tbh. For example, saying that women shouldn't be allowed to vote is very obviously misogyny. Saying that feminism frequently provides space for women to air out their misandrist opinions with a thin veneer of societal critique is not. The abortion thing is a very, very entrenched argument, more about when someone becomes …
/r/MensRights26/03/26 03:12 AM
8

Accusations of lies where there are none? ✅️ Hidden account history? ✅️ "I totally agree, but..." ✅️ Is this bait, or are you a bot? Please be honest?
/r/MensRights26/03/26 01:15 AM
3

Presumably that's why women get all the man-hating content? You're really not helping your case with that particular argument, tbh, especially when the actual things said are so different between misogynist and misandrist videos. You won't find shit with men wishing death on all women, just as an example, at least nothing that will stay up for long. How much of that content is actually posted by men, and have you looked at the comments? Seeing a video where some lady claims that men hate women i…
/r/MensRights25/03/26 07:26 PM
3

I simply do not believe you. Even if you did, the public response to these videos is absolutely and entirely different.
/r/MensRights25/03/26 07:16 PM
2

You've clearly never tried to do what you're telling OP to do by registering for tiktok as a man, and it shows.
/r/MensRights24/03/26 11:02 PM
0

Oh, so the comments of one video weren't expectionally shitty, must mean the entire example is wrong 🙄
/r/MensRights24/03/26 01:34 AM
2

Huh, for some reason the app isn't letting me quote you anymore. That's inconvenient. Whatever, I'll just respond to the paragraphs in order: To you, maybe thats true, if we're being unrealistically generous. No legal system in the world sees it that way, in practice. Why shouldn't they gender their claims? It's a gendered phenomenon, since women are not generally punished when accused of such things, at least not compared to men, and they certainly aren't punished when they're the ones doing th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/26 10:19 PM
1

Yes I used the word “believe”. Yes, and I criticized you for that entirely unfounded belief. Is this genuinely your first time interacting with the very concept of a conversation in which someone disagrees with you? I think male victims of rape should be believed when they go to the police instead of ridiculed. And that female ones should be believed even in the absence of anything like actual evidence, yes. I read the post. What am I doing wrong? Honestly? So, so much. The main thing at this po…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/26 08:58 PM
2

And I still believe that to be true. Despite yourself declaring that this is impossible to conclusively prove, or even reliably source, yes. That's sorta the whole complaint. What do you want? To kill time by throwing scorn at someone who I think deserves it, mostly. That, and to let anyone else reading this thread for some reason know that you ain't half the ally you claim to be. Feel free to stop responding if you stop being able to come up with a response 👍
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/26 08:21 PM
2

Very telling that you were corrected on this front a half-dozen times in the comments of that post, but you're still out here insisting on the same bullshit. You can just say that you're wrong y'know. You stated outright that false accusations were less common than true ones with no punishment for the accused, after 3 and a half paragraphs of saying that this is impossible to know for sure. Also very telling that this is the only part of my comment you felt mentally capable of responding to.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/03/26 07:34 PM
–

Sexist commentary towards men largely doesn’t involve implying that men shouldn’t have rights or bodily autonomy. Really? Now a woman is lecturing me on what sexist commentary towards men is like? Not only are you wrong, not only did you fail entirely to answer my question, but you're also a massive hypocrite, seeing as you'd flip your shit if a man did the same thing to you. "All men should start in chains and work their way out" "Men should be rendered infertile at age 13 until they're married…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 07:28 PM
–

Because surprise surprise, the demographic provably biased against boys are also the demographic most inclined to make life harder for any men unlucky enough to work with them. Are you genuinely stupid, or just acting that way, out of curiosity?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/26 07:22 PM
1

Nothing I said has to do with feminism. Who do you think the debate in question would be with?
/r/MensRights22/03/26 05:44 AM
5

A debate requires a supported claim. It also requires that the other person be capable of actually acknowledging that supported claim. Feminists typically are not.
/r/MensRights21/03/26 07:02 PM
3

I wasn’t downplaying any impact. That might be the most disingenuous way you could possibly frame what you said in that post, tbh. The entire thing was basically nothing except downplaying the harm that sexist statements from women do. I was just not mentioning it, and bringing it up from a different angle. When that angle isn't a critical one in the slightest, you really shouldn't try and tout that post as evidence that you're also critical of feminist ideas occasionally. If that's the best you…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/26 06:51 PM
2

Fun, learn something new every day.
/r/MensRights21/03/26 06:39 AM
2

This is a pointless semantic correction, but I think the word you're looking for is "empathetic." Not a big deal at all, but I think "empathic" might imply a (possibly psychic?) enhanced ability to sense the emotions of others, lol.
/r/MensRights21/03/26 12:31 AM
12

Just as an example, in most countries with a pension, women receive that pension earlier than men despite living some 10 years longer on average.
/r/MensRights21/03/26 12:27 AM
1

Another impact that patriarchy has had on the world. Jesus christ, you people blame everything on your boogeyman, huh? Did that evil patriarchy also make them provably biased against boys, too? https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for identical work, and punished more harshly for i…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 12:10 AM
1

Call out sexist behavior and commentary about women if you hear it. Have you ever, even a single time in all your life, called out sexist behavior from women towards men? Why should they do that for you, if not? Because the word itself is associated with maleness I think it’s easy to take offense to it and believe that it’s an affront to men That's the way the term is most often used. You're kidding yourself if you think otherwise.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/26 12:08 AM
1

Did you mean for this to be a reply to me, or someone else? You accidently made it as a top-level comment.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/03/26 12:01 AM
5

Misandry: dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against men (i.e. the male sex). It's male-only conscription. It's the provable bias against boys in school. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for identical work, and punished more harshly for identical misbehavior. It's…
/r/MensRights20/03/26 09:06 PM
6

Hidden account history? ✅️ Denying the possibility of misandry existing? ✅️ Asking dumbass questions clearly in an attempt to do nothing but waste time? ✅️ Bait, bot, or brigadier, call it here fellas.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 09:00 PM
7

Femininity is awesome, masculinity is toxic. Well, at least you're honest about being a bigoted shithead. Breath of fresh air compared to all the ones that try and deny it.
/r/MensRights20/03/26 01:21 AM
12

Nope. That'd be the answer to my first question, then? Well, sorry I have to be the one to let you know, but it isn't 12,000 BC anymore. There's these neat things called organized society, societal norms/expectations, drugs, and firearms that can all be used for coercion even by those of inferior physical strength. Edit: lmao, they did the respond-then-block shit because of this comment. Oh well, nothing of value was lost.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 10:31 PM
16

Most male abuse happens by other men though. In the US, as many women rape men as vice versa, as per the CDC. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, using the non-gender neutral definition of given in the CDC report. However, on page 19 the r…
/r/MensRights18/03/26 10:23 PM
16

It usually is, there's just relatively regular feminist brigades on the sub, sadly.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 10:23 PM
19

leads to the man freezing in a situation they would easily overcome since men are far physically stronger than women. Is this the first time you've ever thought about the possibility of firearms, or like, social coercion? At all? Misogynistic women exist, women who groom exist, but both are still created by men in a Patriarchal society. Oh, so you're just fucking stupid. Never mind, carry on.
/r/MensRights18/03/26 10:22 PM
2

How? Can you explain that causality? So that's a yes, then? Fuck's sake, you'd rake a man over the coals for even implying that misogyny on the right is simply (and ENTIRELY) a result of men not being loved enough by women. It's unironically an argument I'd expect from a 4chan wacko. If I were I wouldn’t be on this sub surrounding myself with men constantly to talk about men’s issues. Meh, there are at least a dozen recurring usernames on this very subreddit, usually with hidden account historie…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 01:15 AM
8

And she has a career teaching gender studies at a feminist institution, too. Way more relevant to feminism than fuckin' Tate is to any of us.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 12:39 AM
2

You know what, fair point. I do fundamentally disagree with you on the difference in funding between men's and women's cancers, but I was very insensitive and unkind in the way that I accused you of doing what you were accusing other people of. My apologies, that was wrong of me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/03/26 12:35 AM
1

Well I did’t give it that name. It’s called that by oncologists. I'm aware, bud. It has a snappy nickname, which means that at least someone is paying enough attention to try and raise awareness/advocate for sufferers of it. Was I not abundantly clear when I said this the first time? And where are you getting that I’m turning it into a contest? Where your first response contained the repeated insistence that women "won" this particular contest. Your attitude is rather inconsiderate and rude. The…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 11:50 PM
1

Misogyny takes on a different flavor but its just as bad. "No decent women exist" is not actually that far from incel rhetoric and they spout stuff like "women should be sex slaves" and that sort of yikes. And how often do you think that actually happens? How popular do you think that rhetoric is, even in dedicated spaces, compared to the widespread popularity of sexism by women both on social media and IRL? I try to be sympathetic to everyone. Obviously more sympathetic to the people posting th…
/r/EverydayMisandry17/03/26 11:46 PM
1

I didn’t say “they were never loved by men” I said “they were never loved by men AND they never loved men themselves” I'm aware. This still makes it abundantly obvious that you fundamentally blame men for sexism from women. Please keep up.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 11:15 PM
6

And yet the most misandrist feminists in the movement are not called out by feminists... They simply hand wave it away with "Oh, they aren't 'Real' feminists" Or give them lucrative teaching positions like Mary P. Koss.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 11:02 PM
11

So the mere existence of men saying dumb shit is enough to discredit the movement? Why give a rat's ass, then? You can't eliminate every male idiot.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 10:56 PM
2

The opposite is also true. You won't find any dudes saying the shit above about "never trusting women" and there being "no decent women in existence" receiving even a quarter of the positive attention as the shit in the post, though. Seriously, every single comment you've made on this sub that I've seen is just some contrarian bullshit where you bend your back to the point of breaking minimize something sexist that a woman said or did. What gives?
/r/EverydayMisandry17/03/26 10:21 PM
1

I don't know what you mean about the 'snappy nickname' "The Silent Killer" It shouldn't be a competition of which has it worse anyway. And yet, you felt the need to try and win that competition at the very first opportunity presented. Funny how it always pans out like this when someone responds to people like you.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 10:11 PM
1

Oh no, paragraphs and citations as part of a serious discussion. However shall you cope?
/r/EverydayMisandry17/03/26 10:09 PM
4

Does that make it any less factual? Like it or not, a great many of the least morally attractive traits in a man are the most romantically attractive to women. Everyone who knows any number of men knows some real jackasses with a lot of romantic success.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/03/26 03:30 AM
1

It's true that breast cancer is a highly funded cancer, but I definitely disagree that this is a case of women's health being valued over men's health. And all that shit about ovarian cancer is awful and all... but no worse than the many kinds of under-funded man-specific cancers. The very fact that you're able to point to Ovarian cancer having advocacy and a snappy nickname should tell you something, when you see that men's cancers don't have anything like that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 03:24 AM
1

you are the system in question Meh, depends entirely on the location you live in. It sure as hell ain't great, but it's a damn sight better than any time anarchy or anything like it has been attempted in the long term.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 03:20 AM
6

So men and women have this same right (bodily autonomy) As long as you're willing to ignore the entirety of male genital mutilation, which impacts some 70% of US men, sure.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 03:09 AM
9

You were intentionally being misleading dude. If that misled you, I'm sorry, but you seem like the kind of person to get misled by the maze on the back of a cereal box. If you think misandry and a desire to put as many men on the hook for kids that ain't theirs as possible didn't factor into the decision, you're a fool.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 03:07 AM
1

If this is coming From a Marxist then you are really one to talk 🙄 I've never been more insulted in all my life, lmao. Good job with that one, but no, I'm not a Marxist, thank God I don't have quite enough brain damage for that. I'm the type of liberal that the rest of the political spectrum means when they say "damn libruls" for one reason or another.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 02:53 AM
2

Like the fact that, even accounting for means (that is, comparing gun suicide of men and women, hangings of men and women, etc), men still exhibit a higher intent to die. For every method except drowning, strangely enough. That might have more to do with physics and buoyancy than intent, though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 02:49 AM
2

Pretty much word for word, yeah. I remember that passage.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 02:47 AM
3

Interesting cause anarchists always reccomend her to beginners about what a fictional anarchist society might be like That's largely because anarchists are almost universally dumb as rocks, tbh. Edit: though not as dumb as the Marxists, as I've been reminded above.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 02:38 AM
5

Then let’s work to end the draft People who are not subject to it will never actually bother to give more than lip-service to ending it. You'd know this if you were paying attention.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 02:35 AM
8

Feminism responds to inequality by trying to level it. Unless, of course, that inequality puts women as distinctly advantaged compared to men, like the current educational system. Then, they will fight tooth and nail to widen the gap further.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 02:26 AM
4

I’m the type of feminist that likes to make observations about society. Extraordinarily large red flag. Isn’t the issue with misandrist feminists usually that they were never loved by men and never loved men? Good sweet lord, you idiots always make something out to be a man's fault somewhere down the line, huh? Surprised you don't blame a patriarch for the damn weather.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 02:20 AM
5

She did her best to give half a shit about men, and she did far better than just about every other feminist whose work I've read. She still did a remarkably shitty job, though.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 02:16 AM
12

I've only seenn the first 10 minutes so far And yet, here you are bending over backwards to defend it anyway? Christ, I couldn't make someone like you up and then write you into a book, people would call the characters unrealistic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/03/26 12:54 AM
7

The bias from the over 70% female teaching population against males is, though. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for identical work, and punished more harshly for identical misbehavior. It's very easily proven, too. So is the fact that as many men are raped by women as vice ver…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/03/26 11:36 PM
3

The problem is that these jokers only ever really come out of the woodwork in these numbers when someone in the disposable gender is murdered. That's why they're posted.
/r/MensRights14/03/26 09:12 PM
1

Good point, now I feel bad for asking if they were stupid. Edited my own comment, hope they see it.
/r/EverydayMisandry14/03/26 06:57 PM
31

But they weren't, which is the problem. As far as I can tell, the officer had sustained no major injuries, certainly nothing like a gunshot wound.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 11:52 PM
1

Aaaaand there this godforsaken website goes again. They just "nerfed" (not sure that's the correct term, but it's the one you used) your most recent reply as well. Ah well, feel free to DM me if it was anything interesting.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 11:48 PM
14

That just proves that, again, men's rights advocacy needs to be centered on men as victims, regardless of who the perpetrators are. When the gender of the perpetrator matters significantly to the punishment they receive (or lack thereof), and a certain subset of people keep using that lack of punishment as evidence that "93% of rapists are men," then the advocation necessarily has to take into account who the perpetrators are. It's just burying your head in the sand otherwise.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/26 11:47 PM
2

Oh wait, now your own reply isn't showing up. I got a notification for a reply starting with "I didn't ignore..." but that's all that the notification shows me, and looking at this thread in an incognito tab shows that the comment ain't there. I hate this website's shitty design. Maybe try again?
/r/MensRights13/03/26 11:45 PM
2

If a woman literally says "i hate men" in a meeting and there are witnesses that can be objectively seen as misandry by HR. If HR were frequently objective, maybe. You've never interacted with an HR department IRL, have you? They're almost always made up exclusively of either women who say the exact same shit, or people willing to go to bat for the first demographic.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 11:43 PM
15

Because, yes, if you take the stats of men being murdered by women, yes, those numbers are practically miniscule. Only if you conveniently forget that you're using conviction stats, and that the legal system is provably biased against convicting women for anything. Besides, most often the conversation seems to center SA over murder, and women SA men as often as the reverse in the US, as per the CDC: "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summariz…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/26 11:34 PM
0

Why are you lying about what happened? I'm not. What value are you provided with intentionally fabricating the events of the video? None, hence the fact that I ain't doing it. We are done, And nothing of value was lost.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 11:27 PM
1

do you not see the hypocrisy in claiming i’m lying about good faith with exactly no substance to that? Except for, y'know, your completely ignoring my linked comment. That's some pretty substantial evidence that you ain't here in good faith. Is it just not showing up for you, or something? i simply said you’re using the substance to gain some sort of egotistical high ground rather than participating in a good faith discourse like you seemed to want in the beginning. Do you always freak out about…
/r/MensRights13/03/26 11:26 PM
1

Assault is generally defined as an intentional act that puts another person in reasonable apprehension of imminent harmful or offensive contact. Which, y'know, simply walking by a woman does not do. The keyword here is reasonable, but I bet you frequently have trouble with that one specifically, don't you, poor thing.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 11:22 PM
3

For example, I recently made a post there to celebrate some of the women who have advocated for men, and encouraged other people to weigh in with more examples. They removed that post, smearing nearly all of the women on it as grifters and worse, citing dubious, cherry-picked examples, associations with people they don’t like, and even pure guesswork. That also blocked any discussion of other women advocates. When I pushed back, they muted me. Do you have the modmail for that? I'm curious to see…
/r/MensRights13/03/26 11:18 PM
0

I didn’t delete anything… Oh wait, this one shows up! How fun, looks like you werent shadowbanned. Yeah, you don't have to have deleted it yourself, reddit us a badly made website and sometimes it'll happen entirely by chance. the post has been deleted and that messes with notifications. I'm telling you, it ain't just the notifications. Anyone except your own account can check your user page, and see the comments ain't there. That's the point of the "open the thread in an incognito browser" thin…
/r/MensRights13/03/26 11:16 PM
0

Ah shucks, the new reply you made about "not using incognito" (lmao, you can open the thread in a guest account too, it's simply an easier way to do it), is also deleted. I can only tell you made it because I can see the first line in my notifications bar. Looks like you might be shadowbanned, good riddance.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 11:14 PM
1

Is the reply showing up for you at all, actually? For some reason it isn't showing up when I open the thread in an incognito tab, reddit's shit infrastructure may be deleting it by accident.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 11:12 PM
1

Tell me, did you delete your comment calling me "far too stupid to engage in conversation" or did Reddit do that for you? It isn't showing up at this point, even in an incognito browser. If it's still showing up when you're logged in, feel free to open the link in an incognito browser yourself and check.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 11:07 PM
1

Begone, obvious day-old account.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 11:00 PM
0

No any person invading anyone’s personal space uninvited is considered assault If a man attacked a woman like this for doing the same thing in the video, you would not consider that justified self defense because of the assault. Poor thing, you're just completely addled. it’s fucking stupid and little worms like you trying to shape an agenda out of two people in the wrong is why this movement gets shit on so much. Oh, so now it isn't justified self-defense? Lmao. Be better, be smarter and maybe …
/r/MensRights13/03/26 10:59 PM
3

out of interest of a conversation in good faith, like you seemed angered in your claim that i didn’t want. but you told me you like to argue with “idiots” and are now suddenly averse to good faith. Lmao, it isn't "good faith" for you to completely ignore an in-depth reply on another thread and instead come over here and ask me to spoon-feed you reality again. Get outta here, nobody is fooled by this "I'm tooootttaaaalllllyyy someone who cares about men's rights!!!1!" act. while the actual substa…
/r/MensRights13/03/26 10:53 PM
0

It’s also a demonstration of what happens when you invade someone’s personal space uninvited like that, which is (by the definition) assault, so she was defending herself. Oh, so you simply agree that any man who has the gall to exist in a woman's vicinity in these cases deserves to be assaulted. That tracks, just tell people this next time so they know not to bother to engage with you.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 10:50 PM
2

You failed to reply already. Why would I do it again? https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/L2AIgoZlvO
/r/MensRights13/03/26 09:42 PM
13

saying it exists “because people like doing it” is like saying people hate abusive parents “because they like it”. Not quite, no. Why does racism exist? Because xenophobia is an inherent part of the human experience, to some portion of the population. If it ain't color of skin, if it ain't religious differences, if it ain't a half dozen other lines humans use to divide themselves, it's quite often expressed as a hatred for the opposite sex. Like it or not, some portion of the population will alw…
/r/MensRights13/03/26 02:32 AM
7

immediate rage response lol. "I posted an inflammatory and obviously incorrect statement on the internet, and someone called it out as such! Hah, truly I am the winner in this interaction." I couldn't make you up if I tried. but patriarchy has existed for literally millennia. it’s ingrained in the text of ancient literature and in our modern expectations. it’s characterized by things that hurt you today such as stoicism and feats like “body count” or an intense and childish rage response like yo…
/r/MensRights13/03/26 02:22 AM
2

It's evidence of those rights being continually and explicitly ignored by everyone around them.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 02:04 AM
8

arbitrary expectations on men set by other men Lmao. So eager to absolve women of anything like responsibility for their actions that you give them about as much agency for their role in society as literal toddlers, despite them making up half of that society, and well over half of the population actually teaching these expectations. this is from someone who actually does support men’s rights. You really think anyone here is stupid enough to believe you? That's almost more insulting than the dum…
/r/MensRights13/03/26 02:00 AM
24

Because people love to be sexist, and women are people. Misandry is: dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against men (i.e. the male sex). I can already tell you aren't even attempting to engage in good-faith from your comment history, but I'll bite anyway.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 01:58 AM
4

I don't think it's the case here either, but do be aware that those detectors rarely if ever actually work, if you aren't an idiot about how you do the prompts. I've had friends put in their own writing from before 2018 and get it flagged by these systems, too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/03/26 12:46 AM
1

Someone who spent 4 HOURS yelling at me for not being willing to subject myself to one of 3, sensory overloading, ads filled, useless fluff pieces, and all around being an abusive jerk, instead of 30 seconds to send me a direct link, or even a searchable name for a study both him AND OP had. Wow, that's dramatic. They're internet comments bud, are you aware of what yelling actually is? Looks like I agree with your consideration of the study, but this seems a wee bit overdramatic.
/r/MensRights13/03/26 12:28 AM
1

Well, since neither OP NOR his flying monkey Who are you even referring to, with that flying monkey comment?
/r/MensRights12/03/26 11:26 PM
3

The truth is men commit most violence or at least most more serious violence. Maybe if you only count it as violence if the perpetrator is convicted... by legal systems that coincidentally convict women at a tiny fraction of the rate they convict men who commit the same crimes.
/r/MensRights12/03/26 11:11 PM
2

The statistics show that men are most often sexually assaulted by men. The other person told you why, dumbass. It's because it isn't considered SA when the man isn't penetrated, and most female rapists dont have the equipment for that. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same …
/r/MensRights12/03/26 11:09 PM
17

1 is more about empowering women than hating men Are you stupid? I'm sorry, but please be honest. Edit: ah, not stupid, just a little un-perceptive. That's totally fair, happens to the best of us.
/r/EverydayMisandry12/03/26 10:59 PM
2

we absolutely should push back on the hate, just not become walmart Andrew Tates in the process. Mm, I can agree with that much, at least. No worries on the misreading, happens to the best of us.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/26 10:26 PM
1

First of all, if you don't want your comments to look like shit, you need an extra line between paragraphs. Nobody wants to read a poorly formatted block of text. Please don’t lecture me on stats, I’ve known about them for years. They are partly what swayed me away from your side. If knowing that men are substantially discriminated against at all levels of education drove you away from caring about the rights of men, then kindly keep on driving right out of the lives of any men who know you, ple…
/r/MensRights12/03/26 10:25 PM
17

Ms. "Calling men stupid and worthless in as many ways as possible is the key to making good music" is a bit of a man-hater?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/03/26 10:10 PM
4

If we count only pregnancies from rape, we would expect a much higher tally of female victims. For the simple reason that female perps wouldnt be reporting it. For obvious reasons. Not so in the US. Female rapists who get pregnant are perfectly fine reporting it, as they know that even if they raped a child, they'd still be not only protected, but actively assisted by the legal system. "More recently, in 2014, Nick Olivas of Arizona was forced to pay over $15,000 in back-payments to a woman who …
/r/EverydayMisandry11/03/26 10:05 PM
9

This would simply be playing right into the stupid gender war and perpetuating it even more. It's seemed to be the strategy that worked for them. Turning the other cheek and trying to help anyway is exactly what got our asses to this point.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/03/26 08:22 PM
2

Can you elaborate on which stat you mean here, exactly? "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, using the non-gender neutral definition of given in the CDC report. However, on page 19 the report states that during that 12 months the number of …
/r/EverydayMisandry11/03/26 08:13 PM
0

because you said it's not going to happen anytime soon. "Any time soon" is code for "ever, at least in the US." My bad for not making that clearer.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 03:53 AM
0

But here's my question for you, why should I read your sources when you don't even read my entire comment? Because I did read your entire comment. I just think that even in context, that paragraph is pretty disgusting (on top of incorrect, 0 financial assistance for both genders is still equal financial support). Not too complex. You're welcome to read those sources or not do so as you prefer, it's a free website.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 03:50 AM
-1

So me asking people to provide what OP explicitly asked for makes me a brigadier? No, but you being a dick about it and having an extremely suspicious account in general sure as hell makes you look like one. As far as the biases of teachers go, making grading anonymous is the easiest way to bypass that, and with the move of adding technology to learning environments, it's going to be easier to do. Oh come on. A teacher that's been interacting with a class of students for over a month can tell wh…
/r/MensRights11/03/26 03:21 AM
0

Actually I'm quite active on this sub, and have been subscribed to it for years. Mmmhmmm, totally believe that one lmao. Let me just check the post history to validate, oh, wait. Besides, plenty of the regulars to this sub are what I'd consider to be brigadiers as well, simply being around doesn't mean much. OP explicitly asked for a solution that didn't disadvantage women. Which is, unfortunately, impossible. Women no longer getting preferential treatment at every level would be a disadvantage …
/r/MensRights11/03/26 03:12 AM
1

Meh, that's not gonna happen any time soon, and we both know that. Especially when the educational field in general is as anti-male as it is. Equality of funding is about the best we can hope for. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for identical work, and punished more harshly fo…
/r/MensRights11/03/26 03:06 AM
8

You tend to argue a point for the other person and then knock it down, And you seem unwilling to actually argue for yourself. If you can't be bothered, I'm more than happy to speculate about what you're attempting to allude to. You're always welcome to speak up for yourself should you find the mental capacity 👍 It's not worth our time for either of us to pretend you're persuadable. Now who's making shit up about the other person to feel like they won an argument 🤭
/r/MensRights11/03/26 03:04 AM
11

In cases such as Ukraine, where Ukrainian citizens risk being annexed by pro-Russia forces, I am less opposed to internal conscription in principle, but I still agree that expatriated refugees should be left where they are. What's your justification for being okay with government-backed gendered combat slavery in any circumstance? Please, explain specifically why it's less bad when men are fed into the meat grinder while women are evacuated if the government is scared for its own existence.
/r/MensRights11/03/26 12:15 AM
13

Are we discussing Ukraine or not in this example? 99 out of a 100 historical cases of conscription functioned the same way, but sure. Unfortunately, Ukraine is in a position where it has become a global war, and it is no longer about the government ‘fighting its wars’ which it didn’t even start but more so about retaining global order. And this justifies the enslavement of one gener and one gender alone how, exactly? This is a completely different case to oil wars, in which case I agree with you…
/r/MensRights11/03/26 12:05 AM
4

What does keeping my account private have to do with me holding both sides of the coin to the same standard? Easy, it shows that you most likely do not hold "both sides of the coin" to the same standard. If you did, you wouldn't be too scared let people see for themselves. As to the spamming of the subreddit, sometimes I get bored and do things like this. Yeah, figured that part out from the account description. Still seems like bot or brigadier behavior, though. I also try to do it in the femin…
/r/MensRights10/03/26 11:57 PM
4

Yes I do say the same thing when women say that about men, No you don't. If you did, you wouldn't have to hide your account history whenever you decided to spam this sub with inane questions, as I now see that you're currently doing after opening a few other threads from today.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 11:44 PM
23

If the government must enslave people to fight its wars, it should *not discriminate based on sex. You know, they're actually asking other countries to round up male Ukrainian refugees to send them back so they can be drafted. Disgusting, frankly. *edit: somehow autocorrect ate the word "not" in this sentence.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 11:40 PM
19

Because men are the only ones willing to work those dirty/dangerous jobs, duh. Especially when you take into account the provable discrimination they suffer during education (which is the most common path to jobs that don't kill you one way or another), is it really that surprising? https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C…
/r/MensRights10/03/26 11:37 PM
4

Honestly I could make a similar claim about you. No you couldn't, my account history is perfectly visible. Not beating the bot allegations with that one 🤭 The point that BowtiepastaMasta was insinuating was that women often blame men for their shortcomings and I was asking for concrete examples that can be used in debate. Do you do the same when women say the exact same shit about men? I already know the answer, but I'm curious what you'll say. As for comment history, I prefer to keep myself pri…
/r/MensRights10/03/26 11:34 PM
9

Are you a bot? There wasn't a point that they tried to make in that comment, much less one that requires proof, and your comment history is hidden.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 11:19 PM
1

However, I don't agree with the idea of giving men equal financial support, because the entire reason why young adults need financial support is the root cause of the problem. Wow, that's just plain disgusting. Get outta here with that shit.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 11:11 PM
-1

And that right there is zero sum thinking. Hmm, hidden post history? Overly negative comments? Insisting that there must be some way to help men without causing even the slightest increase in competition for women? Ignoring the causes of the issue? Being overly aggressive when their rhetoric is questioned? Why do people like you always seem to show up in this sub? Almost seems like brigading, if you ask me. Regardless, reducing the provable discrimination against boys and towards girls by the ov…
/r/MensRights10/03/26 11:08 PM
9

More and more boys feel as though the system is rigged against them They're right. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for identical work, and punished more harshly for identical misbehavior. It's very easily proven, too.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 11:04 PM
11

What I'm saying is you don't even get that. I'm not willing to converse with about what i do or don't think. Then you are functionally useless, and your contributions to this conversation effectively do nothing more productive just waste space on some server rack somewhere. Much more likely alternative is that you saw the post, wanted to start getting fussy about how you disagreed, and immediately moved to vague-posting about people going "mask-off" without actually reading the comments. Because…
/r/MensRights10/03/26 09:25 PM
15

Sooooo what you're saying is that you see any opposition to unfair hiring practices like this as "mask-off?" Because there's one or two people in here posting conservative opinions, but they're not exactly highly upvoted, and they are related to the issue even if I don't necessarily agree with them.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 09:03 PM
16

Care to be specific with your complaints?
/r/MensRights10/03/26 08:05 PM
1

Did you delete your reply to my comment, or did Reddit do it for you, out of curiosity? It isn't showing up anywhere but my notification bar, not even on an incognito browser.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/03/26 07:47 PM
1

Did you delete the reply to me, or did Reddit do it for you? It shows up in my notifications bar, but it ain't there when I click the link, even on an incognito browser. You can leave your account and look for yourself, if it still shows up when you're logged in.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/03/26 04:48 AM
3

Of course, I think that is pretty sensible. Slavery is never sensible.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 04:46 AM
1

When your country's safety and borders are at risk, you have the obligation to protect it. Like hell I do. Countries get the support from their citizens that they earn, and not a lick more. Judging by how many men had to be literally enslaved to fight this war, their country did not earn their support. It shouldn't matter that women for now aren't, because virtues like your freedoms and your right of Self-determination are being challenged by a foreign entity. And yet, it very much does matter. …
/r/MensRights10/03/26 04:45 AM
3

it's not a matter of gender, it's a matter of conquest and imperialism. It becomes a matter of gender when only one gender is fed into the meatgrinder at gunpoint, and barred entirely from leaving the country. When only one gender is for all intents and purposes enslaved for combat purposes.
/r/MensRights10/03/26 04:39 AM
1

but they really need do what they have to for the country and its people to survive. Hah! Thing is, they ain't "doing what they have to." They're making the disposable gender do what the government wants them to do (fight and die against a larger force) at gunpoint. If the country doesn't have the will to fight, they're more than capable of simply evacuating anyone who wants out. The Russian idiots will eventually hit a nation where the inhabitants give enough of a shit to volunteer to defend it…
/r/MensRights10/03/26 04:38 AM
2

I literally listened to your point and said thanks and it changes my perspective on things. Pretty sure that's showing empathy and basic statistical understanding. Oh dear, you stopped reading halfway through the sentence. Read the rest of it: "a basic statistical understanding of the things you say before you say them." The fact that you would make such confidently incorrect claims in the first place makes it obvious that you deserve all the scorn I put into that comment. And if you read all of…
/r/EverydayMisandry10/03/26 03:06 AM
2

And everyone already has the option to do civilian service instead. "Everyone" isn't forced to either do that or pay extra, though. Only certain specific groups. Odd how that works out, huh?
/r/MensRights10/03/26 02:00 AM
2

And you need something that human medicine has failed to figure out exactly how to help someone like yourself find: empathy and a basic statistical understanding of the things you say before you say them.
/r/EverydayMisandry10/03/26 01:48 AM
2

I've only had a chance to skim it but it does change my perspective on some things, so thank you for showing me that. Mm, fingers crossed it'll make it so your dumbass doesn't go around constantly making ridiculous statements like the one I replied to. Won't hold my breath, though, from the other "contributions" I've seen you make to this sub before and since. But damn sorry for not spending my days waiting for people on reddit to respond to me lmao maybe you need to do the same and take a break…
/r/EverydayMisandry10/03/26 12:51 AM
1

But most women in your life will have these experiences. You're an idiot if you think most men won't have the same, considering that just as many women rape men per year in the US as vice versa. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, using th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/26 11:35 PM
8

One could argue that when women are assaulted on the street, it's more likely to be sexual in nature. They'd be wrong to do so. Women rape as many men per year in the US as vice versa. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, using the non-gend…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/03/26 11:31 PM
2

Depending on how the data's laid out, false accusations may or may not make up some of that 97%, How could they possibly not make up a large portion of thar 97%? Misandrists use these sorts of mistakes as ammo to de-legitimize the men's rights movement :/ Meh, they don't need anything anyone here says to do that, they'll just make shit up the vast majority of the time anyway since that's easier than finding actual sources.
/r/MensRights09/03/26 08:30 PM
2

It doesn't mean that 97% of charges are lies. Not all of them, no. You're a fool if you think that baseless accusations aren't a large, large portion of that 97%, though.
/r/MensRights09/03/26 08:28 PM
2

Yes, why would I be against it? Probably for the same reason everyone in charge of the actual funding for this stuff is. Even you have to know that there ain't a quarter as many programs to get guys into, say, the mental health field as there are to get women into STEM. It's an obvious double standard, that your complaints here make it seem like you hold yourself given the fact that you only throw up a fuss at the mere idea that women could be treated as equals in the STEM field, rather than at …
/r/MensRights09/03/26 07:15 AM
2

Do you feel the same way about female-dominated fields, like basically the entire mental health industry? Do you feel the same way about the less-desireable male-dominated fields, the ones that leave men as some 80% of workplace deaths?
/r/MensRights09/03/26 02:21 AM
3

Still no response to actual evidence that you're full of shit? Predictable, yet still somehow disappointing.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/03/26 02:10 AM
3

It's saying, don't hijack something that's meant to bring awareness to a very pervasive issue that affects the majority of women. That's ridiculous, by every possible metric. As many men are raped by women per year in the US as vice versa. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the s…
/r/EverydayMisandry08/03/26 05:08 AM
2

(as he asked how to form meaningful relationships) ... with people who hate him. You've advised him to just ignore it all and joing in to the hate himself. No wonder you deleted the account these comments were made from, this is some of the dumbest shit I've ever read. The "bear" comment where I'm from, comes up when women are specifically talking about how fed up they are with the crimes committed against women, as seen in the media (maybe women do just as much, but news outlets will prioritise…
/r/MensRights08/03/26 04:54 AM
1

How is it disgusting to join in on conversations damming men who have done evil things? Read the comment again slowly, if you have to. It's disgusting because that is not what the conversations actually contain, 9 times out of 10, and you've been told as much explicitly by OP. It isn't damning men who have done awful things, it is damning men in general because some women (and men) are just chronically incapable of not generalizing their unpleasant anecdotes to a gender at large. If you insist o…
/r/MensRights07/03/26 10:54 PM
6

Women get swept up in the disgust from constantly seeing, hearing, or experiencing things like sexual harrasment from men, and then we say things like "I'd prefer the bear" when in reality we obviously wouldn't choose being stuck with a bear over a man (where we'd have more of a chance of survival against the man). Gosh, you people are just addicted to giving women the benefit of the doubt in all possible scenarios, huh? No. When people say bigoted shit, they're bigots. They're not just "venting…
/r/MensRights07/03/26 06:17 AM
1

Yes, women have better intuition than men. Oh, so even you believe the dumbass unsubstantiated feminine intuition shit. Why am I not particularly surprised, given your other comments? Men don't assume what you think they do, bud. Maybe talk to some men for once in your life and you'll get a better idea of what they actually think.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 05:22 AM
1

it often boils down that men often see women as perfect judges of characters with none of their own trauma and flaws that can cause them to choose less savory people I've heard that claim of "women are the more empathetic gender, with better intuition on people's nature" from women more often than I've heard it from men, by a long shot.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/03/26 04:45 AM
35

If that were true, you'd be calling it the patriarchy instead of the demographic. When people say "the patriarchy" they mean the demographic. Don't give these people too much credit, lmao.
/r/EverydayMisandry07/03/26 04:07 AM
3

I don’t get why this community is labeled “left wing” if radfems (grouping in Marxist Feminists and Anarcho Feminists here) are seen as more polarizing to left wing male advocates than non radical feminists. Then you quite obviously haven't ever interacted directly with radical feminists as a man. Say whatever you want about them supposedly being more leftist than other branches of feminism, they're the ones who shout the misandrist bullshit we criticize feminism for around here the loudest.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/26 03:43 AM
13

Jesus christ, so when men do something wrong, they're obvious examples of a harmful patriarchy? And when women do something wrong, clearly its just because that no-good invisible specter of patriarchy allowed some nasty male to manipulate her inherent feminine goodness for evil? You people are so ridiculous, I'd almost accuse you of being a plant to make feminism look bad if I hadn't heard exactly this same shit IRL before.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/26 01:33 AM
11

The only difference between the average feminist and the type of people to call themselves radfems is that the radfems say the quiet part out loud, IME.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/03/26 01:28 AM
3

You could at least have the common decency to try and learn the language before you start babbling like this at an unsuspecting public, y'know.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 11:35 PM
1

Can't argue on that front.
/r/MensRights05/03/26 11:20 PM
32

And got all of 18 months for it.
/r/MensRights04/03/26 06:29 AM
16

Welcome to the legal system.
/r/MensRights04/03/26 06:29 AM
14

Luckily for you, you don't know what getting murdered is like, and thus can't actually compare the two. Acting like you can definitively do so is ridiculous.
/r/MensRights04/03/26 05:59 AM
12

Did you delete your response to my most recent comment, or did Reddit do it for you? I got the notification that you replied to me, but nothing shows up normally or when I open the thread in an incognito tab. If it's the latter, you might have to use an incognito tab to see that it isn't there, it might show up perfectly fine on your profile?
/r/MensRights04/03/26 01:59 AM
14

You know what you’re right. They don’t specifically say that. But they definitely say worse things especially on the topic of r@pe. https://imgur.com/a/g4tBmmy I've seen misandrist women saying exactly the same shit about men who are victims of rape. The fact that some wackos said massively sexist shit on some random niche website isn't really all that comparable to these women being applauded for saying their own sexist shit on much more mainstream websites.
/r/MensRights04/03/26 01:52 AM
36

Bud, this is the comment you responded to. Not my fault you didn't understand it the first time you read it: I've never seen a caption that reads, "Practicing misogyny in my daily life." If men are the oppressors, shouldn't social media be full of posts like this? 🤔 You have the day you deserve 👍
/r/MensRights04/03/26 01:34 AM
39

Wow, those people are sexist jackasses. Now, care to point out which one of them specifically is talking about how they're going to be practicing misogyny in their daily life? It's the up-frontness with which the above posts do it that the person you replied to was talking about, nobody claims that sexist men don't exist, just that the sexist women are more socially accepted and allowed to say much more absurd shit to applause from a wider audience.
/r/MensRights04/03/26 01:22 AM
46

None of the ones I've seen. Do you have any specific examples?
/r/MensRights04/03/26 01:17 AM
2

Yes. An aggressive and semi-official claim toward expertise on the subject of a court case and a large pile of extremely cheap talk. Basically just high-effort virtue signaling, at best.
/r/MensRights03/03/26 06:38 PM
3

Lol, an amicus brief! That's official lip-service, wowie! So meaningful 🤭
/r/MensRights03/03/26 12:25 AM
1

In Japan for instance where this gendered train car practice is in use, women experience a much higher rate of SA. And this, of course, has nothing to do with them using the same shitty gendered definitions of SA that make it impossible for a woman to assault a man? M'kay. Besides, you made the claim that it wasn't happening at all, dummy. Even the biased stats presented above prove that this is not the case.
/r/MensRights02/03/26 11:27 PM
2

even though it doesn't happen to us at nearly the same rate." Not the case in the US, at least. No train-car specific data, but this is still a hell of a lot better than your dumbass porn-addict example. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data,…
/r/MensRights02/03/26 05:51 AM
5

Lol buddy I'm not even active in any "feminist shithole" subreddits, that's your assumption. And the hidden account history tooootallly makes that believable. "I'm not brigading the sub!!" says the person wearing a mask and "I love brigadier subreddits" hat.
/r/MensRights02/03/26 05:50 AM
0

Men would have men only train cars if they were also experiencing SA. At least in the US, they experience it from women about as often as women experience it from men. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, using the non-gender neutral defini…
/r/MensRights02/03/26 05:48 AM
3

Hah, so I imagine you think that hypnosis hijinks and alien abductions are common occurrences for random attractive women, too? Literally sourcing your unfounded paranoia from porn, I couldn't make this shit up if I tried.
/r/MensRights02/03/26 05:40 AM
15

Sure you weren't, bud. Even ignoring the blatant goalpost moving, how do you square the fact that every single feminist group I've ever been in, IRL or online, has upheld the "men commit 98% of rape, and 99% of victims are women" bullshit despite the obvious evidence to the contrary? What about the fact that when folks like Erin Pizzey try and set up male DV or homeless shelters, feminists will literally run them out of the country with death threats? Feminist groups are far more hateful than mo…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/26 09:51 PM
24

but downvotes for disagreement You literally called men discussing their experiences with feminist groups "incessant whining," because you disbelieved them entirely, so kick rocks asshole.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/26 09:33 PM
18

but in actual feminist discussion groups it’s generally with either a sense of humour or a sense of nuance Oh, so the sexist jackass thinks she's funny, so it's all OK then? 🙄 Eg when discussing who are the more common victims of assault, it IS relevant to mention that most assailants are also men. You've never bothered to actually read up on the subject, have you? "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/02/26 09:31 PM
1

Could be intentional or could not be. I think there's no "deleted" message if they did it fast enough, but sometimes reddit just does it for no real discernable reason, and that never leaves a message. It's been happening quite a bit, lately.
/r/MensRights28/02/26 02:50 AM
21

You do realise the prompt is asking what her love language is? Yes dummy, which in this case, would be exchanging gifts were any reciprocal gift-giving intended. "Receiving gifts" is an entirely different thing. I can tell you have obvious literacy and logic issues, but please make an attempt to keep up. Edit: d'aww, poor critter couldn't handle being told the truth, so they did the toddler thing of replying and then blocking me. Someone feel free to let me know what they said if it was anything…
/r/MensRights27/02/26 11:51 PM
1

You have to say it with a lowercase u to tag them properly, like this: u/0cupofmilk did you delete the comment mentioned above, or did Reddit do it for you? It ain't showing up for me either.
/r/MensRights27/02/26 11:48 PM
23

and she's just filtering the hundreds of men who match with her. The characteristics they filter people by being "gives me free stuff and doesn't expect anything in return" is exactly the point of the post, genius.
/r/MensRights27/02/26 11:42 PM
4

Who has objectified these women here, exactly?
/r/MensRights27/02/26 11:40 PM
23

Considering she put “quality time”, it suggests that she’s looking for mutual effort. That doesn't suggest that at all, lmao. Be honest, are you playing dumb here, or are you like this in your spare time too? "Receiving gifts" instead of "exchanging" or similar wording much more strongly suggests the exact opposite.
/r/MensRights27/02/26 11:39 PM
1

The other guy already responded with the same quote that I would've. Whoever taught you to read should be fired.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/02/26 09:53 PM
5

If they had relevant stats it would not be demonizing. Only if those relevant stats were taken from some currently non-existent country where women aren't given notably less harsh penalties for the exact same crimes, should the be penalized at all. But that's not what feminists usually claim. Nah, usually they state outright that "98% of rapists are men" simply because they know that most reporting agencies don't call it rape when women do it to men. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months…
/r/MensRights26/02/26 08:41 PM
5

I think that may be toxic masculinity And that explains all the women I've heard saying the exact same shit how, exactly? Don't be ridiculous.
/r/MensRights26/02/26 08:38 PM
4

But when it comes to power up top? And at the bottom, conveniently. I don't think it really counts if they're a minority both of the ultra-rich and the ultra-poor.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/02/26 07:36 PM
2

I'd link the comments that make it obvious, but you're too spine-deficient to show your comment history, and I can't be assed to look through the whole thread again. The other guy probably just read a couple other threads down here and figured it out on his own.
/r/MensRights26/02/26 07:54 AM
7

I don’t blame them knowing about 94% of sexual offenders are men (source). Bullshit. It just doesn't get called that when women do it to men. My source is the CDC. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, using the non-gender neutral definition…
/r/MensRights25/02/26 12:56 AM
7

Nah, look at their other comments on the subject. They're just another misandrist dipshit with an over-inflated sense of their own half-baked understanding of statistics.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 12:55 AM
5

Bro found themselves mentally incapable of responding to the other person, so just decided to ignore their comment entirely.
/r/MensRights25/02/26 12:53 AM
5

That's likely because they, like the US, either don't prosecute it when women do it, or else call it something different in the reporting stats. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, using the non-gender neutral definition of given in the CD…
/r/MensRights25/02/26 12:52 AM
6

legitimate research indicate that men are significantly more likely to be perpetrators of sexual violence and crimes, Nope. People just call it something different when women do it. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, using the non-gender …
/r/MensRights25/02/26 12:50 AM
4

The squeaky wheel is the one that gets the grease. Seems like it worked well enough for feminist groups even past the point where women were no longer societally disadvantaged, so why not?
/r/MensRights25/02/26 12:28 AM
10

Results suggest that gender grading gaps are explained by differences in students' behaviour. Sounds like just another misandrist rag doing its best to blame everybody but the teachers for their provably sexist grading tendencies, tbh.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/02/26 11:26 PM
2

Ah, I see what you mean now. I think folks might've thought you meant comment 3 from the second slide, that's likely where the downvotes came from.
/r/EverydayMisandry24/02/26 03:12 AM
2

No deletes, I have literally nothing to hide because I’m on the side of BEING KIND Hmm, weird. It's not showing up on my end, you might open the thread in an incognito tab and see if they still show up. I even tagged you in a reply to prove it Didn't get a notification for that one, either. Likely something broken on reddit's end, as you aren't shadowbanned since I can see this comment.
/r/MensRights24/02/26 02:16 AM
1

Lol, did you delete the response to me, or did reddit do it for you? Mostly just curious, since it ain't showing up anywhere but my notification bar.
/r/MensRights24/02/26 02:01 AM
-1

Sounds like you base all your decisions on a ‘how will they pay me back’ transactional approach. More like a "would this kindness be reciprocated were I in the same situation?" approach, but m'kay. I’ll lead with kindness, and let all the bad things happen to me Good for you. If you want to be taken advantage of willingly, that's your right. Don't claim that anyone who chooses to mind their own business is a bigot or actively harming folks by doing so, though. And if you think I mean harm in a p…
/r/MensRights24/02/26 01:42 AM
1

By the logic of the sub, you included, you would refuse to help a woman up if she fell on some ice in front of you. Eh, not like I'd get any help if the roles were reversed. Why should I go out of my way to help someone who wouldn't help me? You wouldn’t hold an elevator or do the smallest of good deeds because they are female. I never said I was going to do the same things OP is. Frankly, I think the Southern US manners (open the door for anyone within 10 seconds behind you, help people pick sh…
/r/MensRights24/02/26 01:26 AM
7

Lyrrsoh. Treating people differently based on demographic factors IS cruelty. Demographic factors such as... not being known to the stranger that they feel entitled to assistance from? Again, you're willfully misinterpreting the post, bud. This is obvious to everyone involved except the one guy doing the same thing.
/r/MensRights24/02/26 01:13 AM
2

"Stop helping random women". Lol, yeah. Random men don't tend to ask for the help that women often think themselves entitled to from complete strangers. Troll smarter, not harder. Ah yes, "all who disagree with me or the things I say are uhhhmmmmm... trolls! Yeah, that makes sense!"
/r/MensRights24/02/26 01:12 AM
2

I'll stick to my point and say that “random women” is a broad buckshot blast Then you'll stick to deliberately ignoring the point of the post, as is your right. You've been corrected on this front already, so any misinterpretation are strictly your own prerogative. That comment was mostly to let you know exactly the kind of people you're finding yourself agreeing with, tbh. contemptuous radfem zealots that consider their prejudice against men a virtue. You can just say "feminist" y'know. The rad…
/r/MensRights24/02/26 01:10 AM
3

would be better off helping out our fellow men rather than harming others Lmao, nobody has called for anyone else to be harmed, either in this post or the comments. Stop making shit up.
/r/MensRights24/02/26 12:24 AM
4

it was "stop helping women". "Stop helping random women" FTFY Maybe respond to the shit OP actually said, rather than whatever you're so inclined to make up about their statements?
/r/MensRights24/02/26 12:23 AM
0

If you go through the account of the person you just replied to, you'll find them defending exactly those same radfems for exactly those same generalizations, just FYI. Besides, OP hasn't generalized shit, just called for men to stop doing the unpaid and generally unappreciated labor they always have for random (that is to say, not already known to the man) women, just to see if it does anything.
/r/MensRights24/02/26 12:20 AM
9

Lol, not going out of your way to help someone is not being cruel to them. It's just refusing to be actively kind.
/r/MensRights24/02/26 12:07 AM
1

I might be confused here, can you specifically quote which line you agree with?
/r/EverydayMisandry23/02/26 11:43 PM
27

Source for that last paragraph: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for identical work, and punished more harshly for identical misbehavior. It's very easily proven, too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/26 10:15 PM
15

I mean, the 70% woman-dominated teaching industry does certainly deserve some of the blame. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for identical work, and punished more harshly for identical misbehavior. It's very easily proven, too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/02/26 10:14 PM
8

Now, ALL women have to work and fully provide for themselves. Thing is, though, they don't do the same kinds of work, do they? There's a reason that men are over 80% of on-the-job injuries and deaths, and that only some 15% of US women are actually willing to date a man who makes less than them. They can not look to men to carry their burdens, nor can they even expect it. And yet, many do. Feminism tends to encourage this as well, as long as they do so in a way that men don't get anything out of…
/r/EverydayMisandry23/02/26 07:10 PM
2

But to me, if the content is in response to traditionalists, it gets a free pass. Traditionalists are very prescriptive in how women AND men should behave, which often leads to a draconian society If you're dumb enough to think that's anything but an excuse they use to say the shit they'd be saying anyway, I genuinely do not know what to tell you.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/02/26 03:18 AM
12

Did you delete the reply you made where you crashed out about not having a link to any comments where you took the men's side when women body-shamed them, or did Reddit do that for you? If it's the latter, open the thread in an incognito tab, and you'll see that the response ain't there, if it's the former, then you're fundamentally a hilarious person.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/02/26 02:55 AM
14

You're welcome to link an example of you pushing back against the abundantly common occasion of women insulting men by making fun of their genitals or height. I'll wait, but I won't be holding my breath 🤭
/r/EverydayMisandry21/02/26 02:46 AM
13

Uh-huh, that's why you have a hidden account history, I'm assuming? That's tooooottaaaaaly believable, lmao. Don't make shit up, you've literally never had that reaction to a woman making shitty jokes about a man's body, and we both know it.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/02/26 02:43 AM
31

Hah, 20 bucks says that if a woman made a joke body-shaming a man, that your ass would be the first to jump down the throat of any man who made a similar one in response.
/r/EverydayMisandry21/02/26 01:21 AM
7

I mean…if a woman is uncomfortable around a man making her feel bad then I think it’s valid if she feels that way. I don’t think this post is itself misandrist. Then you're actively avoiding thinking about hpw she posted it and the clear intention to get comment engagement with all the misandrists chiming in about how it's "uhhhm, not all men, but always a man!!!"
/r/EverydayMisandry19/02/26 09:57 PM
3

On top of what the other guy said (and the fact that loneliness is more than simply "not finding dates") young women are dating older and older these days, often chasing the finances that older dudes have accumulated over the years that their younger peers haven't had access to, yet.
/r/MensRights19/02/26 02:06 AM
0

Just because you don't know the history of public schools or keep up with the practices and adjustments around them to understand how this isn't true doesn't change reality. Lmao, so nothing to hold up your point besides "wuh, buh, uhhhmmm... Nuh-uh!!!!" then? Tragic 🤭 Nothing in life is a guarantee, but the entire point of public school is to set a baseline for everyone and bring us all to the same standard - to have an equal outcome of education. No it isn't, dolt. If you've ever actually been…
/r/MensRights18/02/26 09:44 PM
1

I've repeatedly said the examples I gave are not outliers at all - do you not understand volume vs. proportional? And I've repeatedly told you that you are flat out wrong about that, and provided reasoning for that as well. Do ypu not understand English? Also, you say you're aware I wasn't speaking in all or zero terms, yet you accuse me of responding to the original poster as if they meant all or zero. Because you did, yes. You gestured vaguely towards the alleged existence of provable male sex…
/r/MensRights18/02/26 04:58 AM
2

I never claimed all or zero. 🤦‍♂️ I'm aware, bud. I'm telling you that neither did the person you replied to, and yet you responded to them as if they did. As if your outliers were evidence of some huge hole in a statement that they did not make. That's the problem. Please keep up I'm pointing out there's a greater number of men who receive 0 or very little prison time. These are not statistical outliers. Men commit far more crimes compared to women, so there's going to be a greater volume of me…
/r/MensRights18/02/26 02:56 AM
2

The person I responded to said "maximum privilege and minimal accountability for women, minimal privilege and maximum accountability for men." - I pointed out there's cases where that's not true, at all. Do you know what the words "maximum" and "minimal" mean? Hint, they aren't "all" and "zero" respectively. As I said, your couple of outlier cases don't mean shit when compared to the actual rule. Feminists claim men get away with it, citing cases where men get 0 prison time and show examples whe…
/r/MensRights18/02/26 01:52 AM
5

Because some crimes going unpunished is meaningless against the actual trend of which gender is given all the agency and accountability for their own actions. The person they responded to never said otherwise, either.
/r/MensRights17/02/26 07:53 PM
2

Hah, one of the only things you've ever said on this subreddit that's worth agreeing with. That's a good one, I'll definitely be keeping it, thanks.
/r/MensRights17/02/26 07:42 PM
0

Oh man, we've got a guy who doesn't understand argumentative nuance. Oh boy, we have one who thinks everyone else is as stupid and incompetent as they are. Sorry bud, but no. The point in context was very clearly about providing public schooling being discriminatory. I understood your point, and it was fuckin' stupid in context. Public schools are explicitly not equality of outcome institutions, at least not when they're operating correctly. They allegedly provide everyone the same oppurtunity t…
/r/MensRights17/02/26 06:36 PM
1

Lmao, your comment telling me that I'm "not worth your time" is deleted. Did you do it yourself because you realized that you were being a self-contradictory dumbass, or did reddit do it for you? If it's the second case, it might still show up on your end, but open the thread in an incognito tab and you'll see it ain't there for anyone else.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/02/26 01:47 AM
0

Alright then idiot, are you talking about the first 2 comments, or the first 2 images, then? Pick one, please. The first two comments arent that bad. Is what you said originally, since you clearly need the reminder.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/02/26 01:44 AM
1

The first one isn't even a comment, it's a post. Dumbass.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/02/26 01:40 AM
0

Okay, so stupid, then? The second reply, otherwise known as the third image in the post, says exactly what I quoted. Re-read it slowly if you gotta, for fuck's sake.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/02/26 01:35 AM
1

When did we? All anyone here has done is point out how objectively sexist these responses are, which apparently you see as equivalent to sexism itself for some reason. I wonder why that might be 🤔
/r/EverydayMisandry17/02/26 01:34 AM
1

The one that says "poor men would choose the same if they could?" Are you stupid, or just illiterate?
/r/EverydayMisandry17/02/26 01:25 AM
4

but it does buy some leeway from what I see. 20 bucks says it wouldn't buy shit if it was a man obviously about to generalize all women as abusers.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/02/26 01:24 AM
1

Are public schools discriminatory in your eyes? Yeah. Probably not for the reasons you're thinking here, though. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for identical work, and punished more harshly for identical misbehavior. It's very easily proven, too.
/r/MensRights17/02/26 01:09 AM
3

We all share the same basic set of rights, Except for the ones women have that men do not, like having their genital mutilation as infants be a crime, or like it being illegal for their government to enslave them for warfare purposes. That's just the US too, it's even more blatant in places like the UK.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/02/26 12:53 AM
2

Women are saying they have been assaulted and you’re saying you don’t believe them which leads them to not trust you. Dummy, these people are going around insisting that disabled men are "just as evil as all the other men," they wouldn't trust men in the first place. Think for just a minute before you start talking next time, please 🙄
/r/MensRights16/02/26 11:51 PM
9

They want you to vote for them while simultaneously being the scapegoat (this is also true for republicans funny, not funny, enough just, again, the inverse). The weird part is that this seems to work for Republicans, at least in some cases. Iirc Trump got most of the Hispanic vote despite the obvious eventual consequences of him winning, which is quite odd to me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/02/26 11:24 PM
4

...Seriously? Your entire argument hinges on this? And you refuse to give any other points then that?.... When I did so here, you refused to respond entirely. https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/s/pm8RohCkSB
/r/MensRights14/02/26 07:53 PM
15

women aren’t barred from their rights, however there’s still definitely areas on improvement we can address to make things more accessible to all and fair. Women aren't barred from any rights socially in the west either, dolt. They're ahead in education, in the workforce (they might earn slightly less on average, but that's because they take safer jobs that end with them being a mere 20% of workplace injuries and an even smaller percentage of fatalities), in mental health, and most other areas w…
/r/MensRights14/02/26 07:46 PM
0

Eh, that's unfair. I think they mostly just didn't understand the history of that specific metaphor and fell for how reasonable it sounds on the surface if you dont think too hard, they seem like a nice enough person otherwise.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 02:13 AM
5

Ah, I see. Sorry for the misunderstanding, and calling you a dolt because of it!
/r/MensRights14/02/26 01:09 AM
8

Huh, I may have misread your initial comment too, then? Are you or are you not trying to use the biased definition from the US to support your earlier statement that rape is a "disproportionately male issue?"
/r/MensRights14/02/26 01:03 AM
5

Hah! Alright, I thoroughly disagree with your original comment, but that was very funny. Sorry for being so harsh, earlier.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 12:49 AM
8

and the amazing curse words. I've always been fond of German, for that. That language's immediate willingness to shove two disparate words together and still have it come out sounding good is very neat, as an English speaker.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 12:46 AM
11

Yeah, no problem. Try not to repeat literal nazi talking points in the future of you can at all help it, eh?
/r/MensRights14/02/26 12:44 AM
15

Nationwide, 81% of women and 43% of men reported experiencing some form of sexual harassment and/or assault in their lifetime. And when men's reports are coincidentally dismissed, mocked, and frequently turned around to insist they must've been at fault themselves? When men aren't taught to see any sign of romantic interest from someone they aren't attracted to as harassment? An estimated 91% of victims of rape & sexual assault are female and 9% male. Nearly 99% of perpetrators are male. (1) Thi…
/r/MensRights14/02/26 12:43 AM
26

Yes statistics, news and everyday reality does prove her fear. Not when you actually look at the statistical facts of the matter. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, using the non-gender neutral definition of given in the CDC report. Howev…
/r/MensRights14/02/26 12:09 AM
27

The analogy in its modern usage (and nearly exactly the same wording as the one you used) literally came from the nazis, numbnuts.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 12:07 AM
20

If you have a box of chocolates and someone tells you that one will kill you and 3 others might make you severely sick, wouldn't you be weary of all of them ? Look up "the poisonous mushroom" and which political ideology popularized this particular dumbass metaphor, please. At least have some historical context if you're going to say this sorta shit.
/r/MensRights14/02/26 12:06 AM
28

but from where I stand it's the same kind of logic that women saying they don't want anything to do with men apply. The main difference is, that the vast majority of the time this sub won't make batshit claims about the vast majority, or even all like in the post, of women are directly abusive or pedophillic. I won't disagree that such a claim would be misogynist, though. Besides, that's just about dating. This person thinks the only way to live is to be surrounded exclusively by women in all ma…
/r/MensRights14/02/26 12:05 AM
2

But it's ALSO not reality that one person attempting multilple times has "no real intent to die". Lmao, sure it ain't. If they truly wanted to be dead, they would've actually killed themselves the first time. Suicide isn't a difficult thing to someone who wants to die, and women are no less competent than men on average. You can have empathy, or you can lack empathy, but you can't do both. I do have empathy. Not for people who use suicide "attempts" as a cry for help or those who use those cries…
/r/MensRights13/02/26 11:42 PM
3

So basically, you think feminism is a monolilth from what it sounds like. He doesn't have to. A movement doesn't have to be a monolith to have recurring issues even between strains. Some feminists are egalitarian where women are concerned, though, I'll give you that. Most are exclusively for women's empowerment even when women are already advantaged though, and it's quite obvious. Just look at who gets 85% of US gendered financial aid during schooling, and which gender is actually doing worse ed…
/r/MensRights13/02/26 11:33 PM
8

I consider myself someone who 100% supports women's rights and advocacy Not the same thing as being a feminist. The word you're thinking of is egalitarian, bud.
/r/MensRights13/02/26 04:58 AM
1

Literally every comment I make here gets mass downvoted. What are you talking about? Jesus christ that's overdramatic, especially on a thread where most of your comments are still positive. Besides, you may have your comments hidden, but just using the account search function gets around that easily, and what do you know, you're just lying outright. You made a few dumbass/uninformed statements that received a downvote or two. Calm down.
/r/MensRights13/02/26 04:56 AM
15

Unless the post has been edited, it never said shit about "all" of anyone. Just asked about "most," which is an entirely different question, with an answer that mostly depends on where a person lives.
/r/MensRights13/02/26 03:23 AM
2

Thing is, though, this isn't reality. It's a stat that's a result of one person being able to "attempt" multiple times (with no really intent to die in any of them) and inflate their demographic numbers, whereas men tend to actually attempt to die, and thus "succeed" in doing so more often within every method, thus becoming 80% of suicide deaths.
/r/MensRights13/02/26 01:06 AM
2

If you were thinking at all, you'd see that this is more than likely just a result of the same person being able to re-"attempt" multiple times, whereas this is obviously not the case for the population that's the victim of 80% of suicide deaths.
/r/MensRights13/02/26 01:03 AM
1

Huh? It says it was built in a rural area in the article and according to this study women have lower levels of schooling, though it improves with each younger generation. No, dolt. I wasn't asking for a source for the discriminating classroom being built in a rural area. As you said, its in the article. I was asking for a source that women in rural areas have lower levels of schooling than their male counterparts, which your link doesn't seem to support. What sort of educational resources do yo…
/r/MensRights11/02/26 07:49 PM
7

Well it looks like this feminiteca is in a rural area, which from what ive seen has lower rates of girls education than boys education, Source: "it came to me in a dream" I do agree that boys and men are falling behind, but thats a seperate issue that would need a different strategy. According to someone with no actual, practical experience on the topic? Classic. Nobody has ever attempted to simply give boys even an equivalent amount of educational resources as a way to solve the gender-educatio…
/r/MensRights11/02/26 04:49 AM
2

Theres a lot of violence among men in mexico, but most of those homicides happen from circumstances unrelated to them being men. Yet again, another unsourced and likely entirely unprovable claim. You aren't even thinking a little bit before you post this shit, are you? Also funny how it's "among men" as if plenty of that violence doesn't come from women who are simply convicted less often. I think a lot of the homicide among men in mexico would go down if there was a way to prevent boys from joi…
/r/MensRights11/02/26 04:44 AM
3

Theres statistical frameworks on it where they do exclude other possibilities. And when these same frameworks are applied to the demographic that's the victim of some 88-89% of homicide victims in Mexico?
/r/MensRights11/02/26 04:29 AM
3

So many people will be "doxxed." In other words a surveillance state will be developed. Will be? Are we still talking about the UK, here? Think that ship has kinda sailed already, tbh. 3/4 of young men and 1/3 of young women visited PH in a 4-week period according to Ofcom. And those are just the ones too computer illiterate to use a VPN.
/r/EverydayMisandry11/02/26 04:25 AM
8

Any guy who thinks women should have equal rights is a male feminist wth. Nah, those are called egalitarians. Totally different thing.
/r/MensRights10/02/26 11:48 PM
18

I just never hear women speak in the sweeping generalizations about men, Have you ever thought about how your specific (and uncommon, especially for those who live outside of large cities) scenario and its exceptionally diverse population might select against the type of women to say bigoted shit out loud? I mean I’m sure it exists out there, but I’m firmly of the mind that we can choose what we let into our worlds in terms of what we consume or associate with. To a certain degree. I largely don…
/r/MensRights04/02/26 05:20 AM
24

You must not watch much news or talk to many feminists as a dude then, huh?
/r/MensRights04/02/26 04:22 AM
15

Lmao, if you'd like to ignore the actual points made in favor of getting pissy over being correctly described, you're welcome to it. Have the day you deserve 👍
/r/MensRights03/02/26 01:29 AM
16

Did anyone ever make that claim, dumbass? Society, at least in the US, has always been predisposed towards treating men as the disposable gender. Remember which gender tended to actively go out of their way to shame men who dodged the draft, most every time it's ever been used in the west. Women and men both support this, historically.
/r/MensRights03/02/26 01:18 AM
21

Wait…who are the people deciding who goes to war? The average voter (most of whom have been women in every election since the 80s) via who they vote into office. Who are the people who decide what job you do? Society in general, so men and women both really. Are you really so deluded as to think that women don't contribute at all to the gendered expectations that put men in the jobs that make men some 80% of workplace injuries? Also, funny how you couldn't figure out how to respond to the other …
/r/MensRights03/02/26 01:06 AM
2

Women live 5 years longer on average, and who, exactly do you think benefits most from and upholds the expectation for men to be providers for their wives' benefit?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/02/26 12:34 AM
4

Because the same studies that show that little boys are able to focus better when they have addiquite access to outdoor/physical play time shows that they perform disruptive behaviors less, and more in line with their girl peers. That's one of the metrics used. Never disagreed that this might happen. But does the bias against them, where their misbehavior are punished more harshly to identical ones commited by girls go away? I'm aware that you're a bit dim due to your recent comment history, but…
/r/MensRights01/02/26 04:32 AM
8

Absolutely, and the most cited reason is frustration with disruptive behavior, the more energy little boys can run off the less disruptive they are, allowing for the biological differences in boys is important, and hopefully that self corrects. If not we need to move to a blind grading model. Lmao, if teachers cite frustration as their reason for their provable grading bias, it isn't the boys' behavior that causes the issue. Being supposedly disruptive shouldn't result in the exact same misbehav…
/r/MensRights01/02/26 04:23 AM
34

Making the mostly female teaching staff less provably biased against boys in general would also help: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for identical work, and punished more harshly for identical misbehavior. It's very easily proven, too.
/r/MensRights01/02/26 04:07 AM
0

The people who set the budgets as well 2/3 superintendents are men, Lmao, and those are not the people handing out biased grades and punishments towards boys. Are you acting stupid on purpose, or by accident? I couldn't handle being ignorant and loud. Which is why you exclusively type your ignorant opinions then, I assume? :P
/r/MensRights01/02/26 03:47 AM
2

I never said men don't face discrimination, Nope, just that any they face is their own fault, and that women are totally innocent of blame in all scenarios. I said the powers that control those systems are held by men. And I informed you that those men don't care any more about the opinions of the average man than they do about the opinions of the average woman. Also, lmao. What men are controlling the educational system, when more than 70% of educators and school faculty are women? Please engag…
/r/MensRights01/02/26 03:16 AM
2

I gave you both the same reason why men are to blame and why women aren't. And both those "points" sucked for the reasons I gave, yes. Keep up, please. They don't make up anywhere close to the same numbers in terms of political, social, private sector power or wealth to actually do so. Bullshit. As I said, women in my country have out-voted men in every election since the 80s so the political thing is bunk, and due to the gender-education gap (one as bad as the one from the 70s, just flipped due…
/r/MensRights01/02/26 03:02 AM
1

I stand by everything I said there. I advocate strongly for men to make the cultural changes they need to make. And you claim that men are the sole cause of all their own gendered issues, and all of women's as well, a statement so idiotic that it proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that you're here in bad-faith exclusively. Men make up 76% of governors, they make up 100% of presidents, they make up 90% of CEOs and 90% of billionaires. Lmao, and women in my country have voted more often than men in…
/r/MensRights01/02/26 02:29 AM
2

In case anyone else gets suckered into responding to this wacko in good faith, she blames men today for things that men in the past did, and that men should get no credit whatsoever when they make society in any way more equal. Women, of course, should get all the credit possible when they deem it acceptable to give men a crumb of their own privilege: https://www.reddit.com/r/GenZ/s/aTRmRq7i4m https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/2cg7jV9niI
/r/MensRights31/01/26 08:14 PM
0

Sure, but the crime stats I've seen it's at least 5-10x less likely than any other forms. it makes up 2% of women murderers and 0.5% of male. You're almost more likely to be set on fire by both genders than poisoned. 2% of convicted (or at least legally proven) women murderers. You didn't read any of that comment, did you? The vrux of my point is that guns aren't really this big equalizer because men are more likely to own and use them then women are anyways, further doubling down on the fact th…
/r/MensRights31/01/26 08:02 PM
1

If you actually read the stat Read the part where I said it literally won't let me do that. I just get stuck on a "tab loading" screen. Do you happen to have a quote for that, at least? Hence why the other myriad of data backs it up. I mean, no. It sort of halfway agrees with you, but nothing you've posted actually agrees outright with the claims you've made. Secondly I didn't mention poison because it's actually not common in either case. Hmm, wonder if it just gets caught less often. Poison is…
/r/MensRights31/01/26 07:40 PM
4

some patriarchies were literally equivalent to slavery for women and more abusive then boss worker relations now See, that's at least half of the problem with people who think like you. You use the same exact wording (patriarchy) to describe the modern US where women have notable advantages at every level, legal, financial, and social, as you do to describe literal sharia law. It makes it nearly impossible to take you seriously, for anyone with an actual working knowledge of how the modern West …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/01/26 07:33 PM
11

Lmao, says she wants tips to not be paranoid... to what seems to be the hive of the most unjustifiably paranoid people on the entirety of the internet. Yeah, that'll go great.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/01/26 07:29 PM
2

fudging the stats a bit, but besides that bucking the trend, it's fairly well documented that men are more likely to own and use weapons then women. Are you really just gonna not count poison, which women also tend to use more often than men, from what I've seen? I'd love to actually read the stats on that here, but it isn't letting me see the full text. This line from the abstract certainly doesn't seem to agree with you, though. PubMed https://share.google/qpe1OTTZFlPfnVsA6 We predicted that m…
/r/MensRights31/01/26 07:08 PM
15

However I think the OP meant that men are more able to break bones/harm in way that requires emergency medical intervention. Bullshit. Maybe the case a thousand years ago, but in the modern world of guns and sharp blades made of industrial steel, able-bodied people of differing physical attributes are all roughly equally as capable of causing serious injury. It's just that one gender in particular has the harm they do downplayed and legally ignored, so it shows up less often in the stats.
/r/MensRights31/01/26 03:46 AM
4

Maybe he's stuck in one of those "most dangerous game" situations. Don't worry OP, the only people who go to those things are rich assholes, just drop a 20 dollar bill on top of a poorly disguised spike pit trap, that'll get 'em for sure.
/r/MensRights30/01/26 02:42 AM
6

Also, so weird to frame this as a benefit to women when it just benefits men by putting all the responsibility on women while minimising their contributions cos men are leading and providing? Providing what? The audacity? Lmao, I don't particularly care about what the original dumbass post you're talking about may or may not have said, but you're an idiot if you can't see that in over 50% of US relationships, the man is providing more money to the household than the woman. In some 35%, they make…
/r/MensRights30/01/26 01:54 AM
4

Scolding? Feels like projection there my friend. So we're going with "intentionally playing dumb, and being patronizing about it too," then? That tracks, yeah. It was neutral and an observation. Not a personal attack on all men. Oh dear, and now that major dramatization. Never said it was bud, just an obvious attempt to shut down discussion that you think is a little too (deservedly) negative of feminism. Oop. I’m dumb as well? No, just came to the conclusion that you're an ass commenting in bad…
/r/MensRights30/01/26 01:50 AM
9

In case anyone is dumb enough to think this person is arguing in good faith, here are some of her other comments. Fun fact, hidden account history doesn't mean shit, you can just use the search function in the account and sort by new: https://www.reddit.com/r/PurplePillDebate/s/faoHgFALDX https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueUnpopularOpinion/s/o9ZpVMVDW2 https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueUnpopularOpinion/s/D6ytWIA48G Predictably, "the reasons women hate men are like, totally socially justified, and people ne…
/r/MensRights30/01/26 12:53 AM
5

I’m pretty sure a majority of feminists aren’t advocating for this, just some random lady on TikTok. Never said they were advocating for it (though I think for some of them that's more due to practicality than disagreement), but they'll sure as hell see stuff like this and like it on social media, showing a consistent trend in what they believe about men in general. Also again, where did I say you shouldn’t talk about social media likes? Are you actively playing dumb here, or is it just incident…
/r/MensRights30/01/26 12:43 AM
8

Where did I tell men to stop being dramatic? I merely said this won’t ever be implemented. Mm-hmm, and in doing so, you said that we shouldn't talk about social media likes as anything like an indication of public sentiment among certain demographics. Also lowkey sounds like you agree with me that likes on social media don’t reflect real life attitudes. They start to indicate real-life attitudes for certain subsets of the population when they reach the hundreds of thousands, though, which is rat…
/r/MensRights30/01/26 12:07 AM
17

Feminists regularly do the same to claim that "the youth" are getting more and more misogynistic. You can see it happen on their subreddits and IRL all the time. Why is it that you only ever tell men to stop being so dramatic about these things, and coincidentally don't say a thing in response to women doing the same?
/r/MensRights29/01/26 11:39 PM
1

Poor thing, looks like someone dated a bum and is trying to genericize her own shitty dating choices to men in general. I hope the next guy is smart or lucky enough to stay far away from you 🤭
/r/MensRights29/01/26 11:33 PM
2

I am almost positive men avoid it because women dominate the field and they just want a man reaffirming what they already think. Have you ever considered that the mental health field being massively mono-gender might bias it towards being less helpful to people who aren't already part of that gender majority, either due to practitioner blindspots or unexamined bias?
/r/MensRights28/01/26 11:23 PM
3

I mean, women tend to be the ones who agree most and push this most on men. Can you really blame the patriarchy in that case? This comment has a good few links on the issue: https://www.reddit.com/r/psychology/s/nE3HAskOxk
/r/MensRights28/01/26 11:22 PM
0

In her defense on this singular front, Freud was definitely a piece of work.
/r/MensRights28/01/26 09:30 PM
-3

Theres always using what few volunteers they do have to evacuate everyone they can. But no, it's all "either combat enslavement for all the men, or castration by the russians!" with you jackasses.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/26 10:53 PM
1

Huh. You and I must have different stances on whether or not slavery could ever really be ethical, then. My sincerest condolences to anyone unlucky enough to need to interact with you IRL.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/26 10:32 PM
0

People like you keep harping on the Ukrainian government drafting people. The only reason they are drafting people is the russians invading them "Harping" about combat-slavery? Fuck's sakes, if enough people can't volunteer to defend the country, they shouldn't be forced to do so. They should be allowed to leave, or stay and deal woth the aftermath. The only reason they are drafting people is because the government has decided to protect itself at the expense of it's citizens.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/26 10:20 PM
2

Does that make the 180 with this sub actively defending male-only conscription any less ridiculous?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/26 10:16 PM
2

He is a threat to liberal democracy and human rights, which I value. The world over? Don't be ridiculous. You value the Russian death tolls more than you value the Ukrainian living, clearly. If the sentiment isn't there among the population to fight, then the land isn't worth fighting for, no matter how lowly you value those men's lives or their own human right to not be enslaved for combat purposes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/26 09:37 PM
6

I feel like stats around sexual crimes are quite risky as it's historically one of the most under-reported crimes there are. For one gender more than the others, too. But if you want to go that road, there are many more crimes than rape. There's roofies, groping, etc. Even if rapes of both genders are comparable, there's a lot more casual sexual assault going the other way. Bullshit there is, there's just more convictions when men do it. You can check the CDC stats, rookies would still count as …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/26 09:07 PM
5

Come on bud, even you should be able to figure out that abortion bans, while unethical and a bit fundamentally stupid, are not the same as forced vasectomies. Think for a bit here, we all believe in you. As for the latter two, I haven't heard anything about that, actually, and I live in a pretty red area. Is there a link you might have to who exactly is calling for these things?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/26 08:53 PM
4

I mean, it's not a cult by any definition I can think of, personally. A whole lot of them sure do hate men though. Maybe if you want to respond to specific sentiments, you should respond to the comments containing them, instead of making a top-level thread for it? Might go over a bit better that way, if people have an immediate example of the problem.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/26 08:51 PM
6

Welcome to official US reporting definitions. They suck.
/r/EverydayMisandry26/01/26 03:43 AM
14

The CDC uses those numbers, but only because they conveniently define rape as requiring penetration of the victim, so only those with a dick are really capable of rape at all. Counting cases where men were forced to have sex with women as rape, it's damn near equal, often showing men as more victimized. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during th…
/r/EverydayMisandry26/01/26 01:04 AM
10

The stats are far closer than most are willing to believe, largely because the CDC actively works to obscure them and call everything rape except when women rape men. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to give reliable data, using the non-gender neutral definit…
/r/EverydayMisandry26/01/26 01:01 AM
9

My favorite example is that only 20% of vegans are men because men feel like pussies if they don’t eat meat despite veganism’s obvious moral superiority. Because women, yes, even other vegans, tell them this explicitly. https://www.reddit.com/r/psychology/s/nE3HAskOxk Or why so many men are right wing lunatics. 33% of voting-age men voted for Trump in the last election, compared to 30% of women. Don't be stupid, if you can at all help it, please.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/26 12:40 AM
16

When you see that this person and those like her are invited to podcasts, generally seen positively by "standard feminists," never ever under any circumstances criticized by them, well, it paints a picture that anyone with eyes should be able to see.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/26 12:37 AM
10

Oh wait, if you check their account (use the search bar and sort by new" you'll see that they post a lot in rteenagers and rinceltears. Not surprising that they'd come here and engage in bad faith, tbh.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/26 12:34 AM
15

Is any other kind of bigotry "... Bad?" to you?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/26 12:33 AM
9

Can't be a satire mirroring something that nobody has actually said, dolt.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/26 12:30 AM
14

But every woman either has or personally knows someone who has been abused sexually. In 2011 and every year the CDC has bothered to gather stats, the same amount of men are abused as women. Don't spread bullshit, please. "Next, we consider the data for the 12 months preceding the CDC report survey, which was summarized in the report. On page 18 of the CDC report it states that 1,270,000 women were raped during this 12-month period and that too few men were “raped” during the same 12 months to gi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/26 12:25 AM
4

You mean the physical characteristic most common for women to insult a man by for just about every reason? The one that people claim has some tenuous correlation to actual morality? That one?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/26 08:46 PM
3

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-about-trauma/201902/when-male-rape-victims-are-accountable-for-child-support/amp Here's the first article that came up when I Google the subject, detailing a few of these cases, the consequences for the boys raped, and the lack thereof for the women doing the raping. Heck, it even has the usual feminist response as per Mary P. Koss. They do face consequences. They are in jail. Bullshit they do. The CDC themselves refuse to call…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/01/26 08:30 PM
9

What led you to think that? Am I missing something from the article?
/r/MensRights24/01/26 04:22 AM
8

I mean, those ones very obviously aren't false. There's too much evidence against them at every level of the process. They just happened to be richer than God, so the charges will not stick.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 04:19 AM
2

Huh. I'm not sure how much I agree, but you get points for consistency for sure.
/r/MensRights24/01/26 02:53 AM
3

By that thinking, then well over a quarter of the violence commited by men probably doesn't count as their fault either, does it?
/r/MensRights23/01/26 08:36 PM
5

They're doing their best! Their best, however, sadly sucks quite badly.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/01/26 01:08 AM
2

I’m late to this reply because of the holidays. Hope you had a good holiday time too. Bit boring, but I can't complain. You too. But man lmao, you seem like a real piece of work. The people that work with me have had no complaints so far. Then I compliment their tact. NO police officer is simply gonna book a dude just because of “he said, she said” statements. Depends what you mean by "book" here. He'll most certainly arrest a guy on that, as I've seen IRL when my buddy called the cops on his (t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/26 09:04 PM
1

Nah, I seriously doubt either gender is notably more gullible on average. Women do have a higher in-group bias according to some studies I've seen, but that's not the same thing, and wouldn't matter in this context anyway because men have a roughly equivalent out-group bias. Don't believe everything you see on TV either, plenty of dudes get scammed into joining cults.
/r/MensRights21/01/26 05:30 AM
1

While various individuals have promoted it in western culture, for a variety of reasons, reduction of pleasure wasn’t one of the ‘original’ reasons started circumcision in western countries wanted it for both sexes. It was for Kellogg, who again, can largely be blamed for the practice being commited on some 70% of US boys. Maybe you should speak less on subjects that you clearly don't know much about? Just a thought.
/r/MensRights21/01/26 04:36 AM
3

Those were the groups that ran a woman out of the UK with death threats for daring to insinuate that men might, just maybe, deserve a domestic violence shelter of their own. It ain't all of them of course, but the sentiment has always been there.
/r/MensRights21/01/26 04:31 AM
2

You might've meant "defund" not defend.
/r/MensRights21/01/26 04:29 AM
1

which is also the negative, as you get tarred by the lowest common denominator of responses, when statements and comments are cherry picked like above. Realistically, it sits somewhere else. If that were the case, then the misandrist comments wouldn't consistently be the highest upvoted on subreddits like that, just saying.
/r/MensRights21/01/26 04:28 AM
25

Even in cases where adult women provably raped young boys in the US (proven because the lady got pregnant), rarely, if ever, will the woman face anything like consequences. Most often, she gets to keep custody of the kid, and the literal child is forced to pay his own rapist child support when he hits 18 (with backpay from the time it took him to get there, resulting in huge fines building up by the time he hits 18). This has been decided by multiple state supreme courts, on multiple occasions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/26 02:45 AM
35

Not only willfully blind, but actively hostile to the idea of holding women accountable for this sort of thing, see Mary P. Koss, the jackass responsible for no small part of modern friction between genders.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/01/26 02:24 AM
8

Welcome to giving half a shit about when bad things happen to people who aren't women. This will continue to happen if you continue to not be a sexist towards men. It's more common on the internet than IRL, but sadly most everyone on the internet exists IRL too, so maybe just keep quiet about it if you still want to be around people who do treat men as disposable at best. Sorry.
/r/MensRights21/01/26 02:17 AM
3

About the only thing they've made worth looking at in years is their crosswords, tbh. And wordle, if you're a masochist, iirc they run that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates19/01/26 05:52 AM
106

Feminists actually working towards gender equality, what a joke. At least this one admits they only want to work towards "equality" in ways that benefit women, and don't actually care about anything like true equality.
/r/MensRights18/01/26 06:19 AM
10

Fun fact, if you want to look at someone's account history but they have it hidden, just use the account search function and sort by new. You're exactly correct, nothing of the sort. It's mostly bowling and video games, really.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/01/26 12:40 AM
13

You are only blaming women when in reality it is more often that women are supportive of males than themselves. You say this out of lots of experience being a man, right? Or is this the equivalent of my racist (very white) grandmother talking about how much nicer white people are to black people than black people are to black people?
/r/MensRights17/01/26 03:23 AM
1

I’m sorry I can’t control the actions of every single person in the universe. Never asked you to do so, just told you that you ain't the eternal arbiter of what feminism actually is in practice, and that other people likely have a better idea of how feminism treats men than you do, as someone who ain't a man (going by your comment history. Free tip btw, hiding account history doesn't actually do anything, since anyone can just use the search function on your account and sort by new). I call out …
/r/EverydayMisandry16/01/26 11:57 PM
2

Meh, that's just you clinging desperately to a No True Scotsman tbh. Every single feminist group I've ever interacted with IRL or online has either been explicitly man-hating, or disallowed any criticism of man-hating under the guise of creating a safe environment for women to vent (about how much they hate men). Maybe if feminists didn't want the entire group to be associated with misandry, they should've made even the barest minimum possible effort to call out the sexists in their midst instea…
/r/EverydayMisandry16/01/26 11:29 PM
3

Hush r/psychorsike addict, the adults are talking. Seriously, anyone reading this should have a look at this wacko's post and comment history. You can get around the hidden account history silliness by simply using the search function and sorting by new. Hilarious shit, Tries to use Indian suicide metrics to paint marriage as a bad thing for women globally, and even wackier things than that. What a character. Their username is u/Acceptable_Rope_6523 , should they delete this comment.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/01/26 09:41 PM
6

Like how do they reconcile with that? That's easy, the women who are like this simply hate their spouse, string them along for whatever benefts they can extract during the marriage, and sit content in the knowledge that the legal system ensures they'll more than likely come out ahead should the guy ever grow enough of a spine to leave her.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/01/26 09:33 PM
6

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for identical work, and punished more harshly for identical misbehavior. It's very easily proven, too.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/26 02:34 AM
4

Women have almost the same exact level of loneliness Women *report almost the same exact level of loneliness. Looking at the actual, measurable negative effects of loneliness makes it very clear that this is not accurate to reality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/26 02:30 AM
1

cuz im not logged into reddit 24/7?? And because your account looks like a bot account. Frequent, single-sentence comments that all smell like sexist rage-bait, with few if any responses to anyone who replies? Very bot-y to me. and this is very clearly a fake story please use your critical thinking skills The idea that someone might be married to a person who disagrees with them about the definition of words like patriarchy and then want to vent about that is "very clearly fake?" Are you high?
/r/MensRights14/01/26 05:02 PM
3

it's not bad faith it's my opinion The opinion isn't what's in bad faith, it's the way you express it and refuse to acknowledge comments with sources that objectively prove your opinions to be incorrect. some guy was saying that boys should be beat as children, And someone else explained to you how that isn't quite what he was actually saying. Yeah, that guy can't write clearly to save his life, but it was effectively just a statement that a little rough-housing should be tolerated, so as to hel…
/r/MensRights13/01/26 02:33 AM
5

Re-commenting since the last one didn't show up: You shouldn't be. You're all over this subreddit constantly making arguments in bad faith and trying to bait people into wasting time on explaining obvious concepts to you. For anyone who wants a laugh, you can get around people like u/Puzzleheaded_Cap_746 who hide their account history. All you have to do is use the account search function and sort by new, nothing is actually hidden. You can even filter for comments or posts only. You'll see that…
/r/MensRights13/01/26 02:25 AM
2

Shitty reply.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 02:01 AM
16

Your denial of the possibility that women who aren't perfect might exist is insane. Be honest, are you a bot? Your unwillingness to ever respond to any of the replies to you make it seem that way.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 01:59 AM
4

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for identical work, and punished more harshly for identical misbehavior. It's very easily proven, too. This has all been linked to you before, though, so I dunno why anyone here even bothers humoring you at this point.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 01:56 AM
5

You deserve better, if she's really as beyond help in these matters as you make her out to be. Even just her utter unwillingness to meet you in the middle for basic definitions of words would be a great reason not to marry someone, IMO, and an even better one to leave 'em.
/r/MensRights13/01/26 01:54 AM
4

but honestly, a lot of it is just schools trying to teach kids empathy and respect early, not “turning boys into robots” or anything. Nobody thinks they're getting turned into robots. Just easy marks who will be too convinced of inherent feminine goodness and immutable masculine sin to notice when they're inevitably taken advantage of by the wackos in that country.
/r/MensRights11/01/26 09:50 PM
3

Huh. This is the first time someone has actually been understanding when I pointed out autism is bad at social cues. In my experience, that sort of thing happens because it seems like a majority of this website is autistic, and some of them get a "well if I can deal with it, so can you, stop making excuses!!!1!" attitude on the subject. Not really a good thing for anyone involved, but it's my personal theory.
/r/MensRights11/01/26 05:45 PM
7

Actually, Ill blame autism. Not picking up social cues is part of the package. Mm, fair enough, I suppose. Sorry if my correction was a bit harsh. If you actually look at my comment history youll find plenty of my comments are telling people off for misandry. Easily verified. I actually just did, and you're not at all incorrect. My bad, there's a lot of people who brigade this sub from those and so I just assumed.
/r/MensRights11/01/26 05:32 PM
3

wild. i said "most of them are not". You said "most of them are not :)" and if you can't tell why that's condescending, you're a lost cause. You them followed it up with this paragraph: why are you people upset most of the comments under the post are not against the poster who is the victim in this situation? would you prefer him to be harassed by the public or would you prefer no one checked the comments so you can keep fantasizing about him being harassed? Confidently asserting that you think …
/r/MensRights11/01/26 04:46 PM
4

I always considered "the patriarchy" to be the name of the social/cultural norm of men being head of the household. Then you either haven't spent much time interacting with the feminists who usually use the term, or you're being intentionally obtuse. Going by the subreddits you tend to spend time in and how exclusively misandrist they tend to be (inceltears, pointlesslygendered, and letgirlshavefun), I'm going to assume it's the latter.
/r/MensRights11/01/26 04:35 PM
4

i told you the situation changed for the better. so again, why did the positive update upset you? Because you gave that update in the most condescending "woman going through to reassure and talk over those hysterical males fantasizing that they could ever possibly be victims" way possible, dunce. Let me know if you need further simplification on why people don't appreciate dumb shit like that 🙄 did you read "woman" and saw red losing you comprehension ability? No, poor dear, I read an entitled w…
/r/MensRights11/01/26 04:23 PM
4

all the top comments are "nta" or "incompatible". don't stop yourself from checking. I did, and this wasn't the experience I had. Most of the top comments at the time were the jackass ones, which you'd know if you could read and bothered to do so with my comment. also, is putting up an option to donate begging? When you wrote it like you did? Absolutely. Are you high? you should naturally feel sympathy for people in difficult circumstances. You being a woman is not an especially difficult circum…
/r/MensRights11/01/26 02:52 PM
7

most of them are not :) only two threads why are you people upset most of the comments under the post are not against the poster who is the victim in this situation? Because you clearly have a very selective memory of that thread, by far the most upvoted comments were those being an ass, and the most downvoted ones were his replies, unless it changed since I saw it. Edit: Checked her account. First post that shows up is begging strangers for money and trying to scrounge for sympathy by calling h…
/r/MensRights11/01/26 01:32 AM
3

They still almost all fund the efforts to increase the gender-education gap, at the very least.
/r/MensRights10/01/26 02:57 AM
0

"They are all the same" is generally some kind of bigoted no matter which demographic you say it about when that demographic is only defined by aspects of their birth, just a tip. Do better.
/r/MensRights09/01/26 09:22 PM
1

Have some class, dude. Sure, there are some people on this sub who are objectively not the allies they claim to be, but no reason to be a sexist prick. Women are just as capable of giving a shit as anyone else, should they choose to do so.
/r/MensRights09/01/26 05:04 AM
55

20 bucks says this gets no response. Open to listening and learning my ass.
/r/MensRights08/01/26 06:23 PM
9

https://www.reddit.com/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates/s/YTchWcLxg0 This comment talks about it quite a bit, has some sources, apparently The Guardian and NYT.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/26 06:00 PM
18

IDK, I find it really fucking gross and unsavory your first thought after The State murders a citizen is "Pfft, if it was a man nobody would care!!!" Considering that there were some dozen men previously and people (the media, at least) didn't care nearly as much, well...
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/26 03:43 PM
13

So the government is responsible for getting men dates ? Literally who the fuck said that? There's a bit more to the loneliness epidemic than men having trouble finding dates. That guy is a bit dim if he's thinking that the right is any better, but if this is how the left feels on the subject as a whole, I can't blame people much for not voting for them. Not much.
/r/MensRights08/01/26 02:35 PM
3

I agree with that take. we see the exact same thing happening in this exact subreddit I'd be lying if I said that doesn't happen around here sometimes, but even you admit that looking at actual legal biases, we have a bit more standing there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/26 01:01 AM
13

No need to be rude. I disagree, there's very much a reason to be a bit rude when people go around making confident and statistically unsupported statements like that one. You're conflating the legal system with social biases. They are not even slightly similar. Social biases, like the ones that have women as the group who lives longest, that have women on the happy end of a gender-graduation gap as bad as the 70s (just flipped), and that put women in control of some 85% of consumer spending? The…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/26 12:57 AM
10

So your argument is "discussing intersectionality is bad because women bad"? What? No. Just that an extremely monogender environment like the average college Sociology class is thoroughly likely to put themselves on top of the oppression leader boards, lip service paid to intersectionality or not. This is the case with the psych-related fields in general IME, but college sociology classes specifically, on account of them being some 75-80% of grads in the field, going by this source: https://www.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/26 12:53 AM
13

I think the vast majority of men downplay and dismiss how ubiquitous and omnipresent misogyny is in our society. Wow, you are all over this thread with wacky takes. Okay then, if misogyny is both ubiquitous and omnipresent, what legal rights do men have that are denied to women? Oh wait, women are the only gender with specific gendered rights not afforded to the other genders, mainly in the realms of infant mutilation, crime reporting, and conscription? Weird.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/26 12:29 AM
3

There is a vital difference between their theory on the subject and how they apply the concept in practice, though. In theory, almost none of them ever agree on the definition of the word. In practice, though, it's pretty much all the "girlboss" variety for the average adherent of any given branch.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/26 12:23 AM
8

Not the way the average college sociology class does it. Just look at the gender breakdown in those spaces, and It'd frankly be more surprising to not see the idea of intersectionality thoroughly misapplied to the conversation at hand.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/01/26 12:21 AM
7

So a domestic violence case involving a married couple is the same as saying hello 😆. No, dolt. The fact that the guy was arrested even despite all available evidence pointing to him being a victim makes it pretty believable that in an absence of evidence entirely, the justice system will default to believing women in the short term. At least attempt to keep up, please.
/r/MensRights07/01/26 11:35 PM
2

You could instead move the conversation into DMs as it seems like an interesting one, but in my experience, very few people check those. Good luck either way, I fuckin' hate shadowbans. If mods want to ban someone, the least they can do is tell the person who got banned about it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/26 02:57 AM
36

Nah, men are afraid of rejection not of legal consequences. Ah, sorry. Wasn't aware that you were such an authority on what men in general think that you felt comfortable coming into a group of multiple men saying the same thing and insisting that your personal interpretation is more correct than the common one. I'll make sure to ask you before speaking on the subject next time 🙄 Any man that convinces himself he’s gonna get arrested for assault for saying hello is a goofball that is probably bo…
/r/MensRights07/01/26 02:51 AM
2

Uh oh, looks like you've been shadowbanned. The more recent comment doesn't seem to be showing up either. You can probably still edit your initial comment if you really think it's worthwhile, either that or take it up with the mods/reddit admin, dunno who usually hands out shadowbans.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/26 02:24 AM
45

Maybe we should make rule 3 into being stupid enough to believe this shit. To steal a line from people I despise, it isn't every woman, but it's enough of them to make approaching a bad idea for most men.
/r/MensRights07/01/26 02:06 AM
0

If you replied to me, you should open the thread in an incognito tab or on another account. Looks like the reply may have been deleted, even if it still shows up on your end.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/01/26 12:58 AM
12

Are you going to respond to even a single one of the people who replied to you? Somehow I doubt it, given how utterly bare of actual logic your points are, but I'm curious if you're just taking a long time or if even you acknowledge that several of these points are completely indefensible. It’s still important to understand why the frameworks developed imperfectly in the first place. I can tell you that. Feminism cares about women, and not at all about men. This is abundantly obvious in every st…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/26 10:32 PM
5

Andreyeva et al., 2008 Eisenberg et al., 2003 Falkner et al., 1999 Fikkan and Rothblum, 2012 Fikkan and Rothblum, 2012 Hebl and Turchin, 2005 Puhl et al., 2008 Spahlholz et al., 2016 Now tell me, do any of these happen to take into account the fact that women are significantly more likely to seek medical attention than men, under every circumstance? If we look at weight-related deaths in the US, it seems like men make up most of that particular population. If we are factoring in undiagnosed eati…
/r/MensRights06/01/26 05:01 AM
3

Yeah but women get fat shamed way more even if they're underweight Source for any of that? More than 90 percent of people with eating disorders are women and anorexia is the deadliest mental illness More than 90% of diagnosed eating disorders are woken. There is a difference.
/r/MensRights06/01/26 04:21 AM
5

I feel like women who do that might have gone through truama from man/men My racist grandma went through the trauma of getting mugged by a black person more than once. This does not do shit to make her any more understandable or less racist when she uses "caution" as an excuse to mistreat anyone with a skin color darker than printer paper. Maybe it's just me but femimism treats it as if almost every man is violent nowadays like they were a long time ago Well, that's just downright historically r…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/26 12:53 AM
4

They consider a country to have gender parity if women are notably advantaged over men, or if they're equal. Actual equality is an afterthought to them, just another women's (and only women's) empowerment group masquerading as giving a shit about equality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/01/26 12:47 AM
44

Man, you gotta get off that sub. There's never going to be anything worth looking at, there.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/01/26 10:33 PM
6

In addition to what the other guys said, we have proof that these are just anonymous slander machines filled with women who've never even met the guy being posted. This is proved by people who posted men from thispersondoesnotexist.com and got dozens of accusations of cheating and violence for the completely fabricated dude.
/r/EverydayMisandry05/01/26 10:14 PM
12

About 30% of voting age women voted for Trump, vs some 33% of voting age men, if my math is right. But social media will go out and pretend that shit is proof that "yes, all men are bad," and that all women are perfect progressive angels. When this fact is pointed out, they blame men telling their wives who to vote for. They're so attached to the idea of perfect inherent feminine virtue, that they're willing to act like women are children easily led along by the hand whenever it's convenient for…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/01/26 10:12 PM
8

If it helps, it's unlikely to take that long. South Korea certainly won't last that long without social upheaval within a decade or so. Even then, it might be a bit late, really.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 06:54 AM
12

I think I can confidently say that that is a very rare occurance lol. Any particular reason for that confidence? It's unlikely to be common or it would be visible in population numbers by now, but "very rare" seems to be a bit of a stretch, all things considered.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 06:52 AM
0

Let’s not get caught up turning against each other. Then maybe don't be a contrarian insisting that other people are complaining wrong the next time the topic comes up ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Thanks for the discussion anyway, though.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 06:42 AM
4

It’s actually legally mandatory. The mother doesn’t have a say unless she specifically objects to it. Eh, in some districts, not others. Besides, the fact that the mother almost never does means the same exact thing, even when that is the case. Downvote me all you want, I’m just saying it’s literally in the Bible and the Koran that circumcision is “the will of God” or whatever. Ignore my points all you want, that ain't the reason mothers in the modern day don't give a shit if their infant sons a…
/r/MensRights03/01/26 04:19 AM
1

statistics that always stuck out for me was suicide. The rates were higher for attempting by females but males had higher rates of actual deaths because of the method they used, mainly guns and other more fatal means. Nope, men are more likely to actually "complete" suicide than women even within the same methods. This is fairly obviously because women are less commited to actually dying. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165032711005179 Men are 80% of actual suicide deaths…
/r/MensRights03/01/26 03:01 AM
4

You tear down my statement through quotes but no substance. Ah yes, specific responses to each of your points in order. No substance there, no sirree. I also have done no insults to you and pretty sure im keeping up. Obviously not, considering your utterly wack-ass and conflicting statements of "okay yes, these things do happen to men much more often than they happen to women, and men are much less safe in general" And "But like, women felt more threatened than men!!! Or at least knew other wome…
/r/MensRights03/01/26 01:37 AM
7

But seriously, my perception based on experience is fully from seeing things happen to my friends, and things that have happened to me. Nope. Either you have a very weird demographic of friends, or you're massively over-hyping the shit that happened to your female friends and underestimating the shit that happens to your male ones some 4x as often. For being threatened, or feeling threatened, when did mens rights become an all out disregard women's feelings? When those feelings ceased to show an…
/r/MensRights03/01/26 01:27 AM
2

People who give half a shit about men's rights, since "what feminist say" seems to have so much importance on the subject at a legal level.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 01:16 AM
10

but that doesn't mean we dont have a perception based on experience that is cause for concern. That perception is based more on a diet of too much true crime media than anything like experience, and I think even you know it. or truly felt threatened. Oh no, she felt threatened. Surely this must mean she actually was, despite all statistical reality making that absurdly unlikely. So true bestie.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 12:54 AM
6

Could be semantics, Not really, no. It's just you lying about what was specifically said to try and make the guy out to be worse than he is. This is obvious. Totally not doing a generic "blame men, he should drop everything for her". If anyone believes that, I've got a bridge in Chicago to sell 'em.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 12:52 AM
7

Men at large actually support circumcision more than women do Complete bullshit, unless you have anything like a source. Everything I've read points to women usually being the ones to make the decision to cut their son, often for aesthetic reasons.
/r/MensRights03/01/26 12:48 AM
8

While I agree circumcision is barbaric and should not be the standard, it’s been practiced for thousands of years because of religion, so let’s not blame feminists for it. Not in the US, where it is performed on some 70+% of boys, most often at the insistence of the mother. 70% of the US ain't Jewish, in case you weren't aware. Plenty of people have been brainwashed into thinking it’s normal. We need to have a conversation instead of confusing the principle by being outraged by “the other side.”…
/r/MensRights03/01/26 12:44 AM
2

They're not plants, the calories are coming from somewhere. Pretty much everyone can lose weight, simply by eating less. Some will have more trouble keeping the weight off than others, but dietary change works in 100% of cases.
/r/MensRights31/12/25 12:53 AM
10

this textbook is only useful as an entry to broad concepts in Psychology. Not true, you could probably burn it for warmth or chuck it at somebody if you wanted to! Lol.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/12/25 12:49 AM
6

Username is accurate, because that's the biggest fucking reach in all of history, considering that there were half a dozen examples disproving it that you read through before you got there.
/r/EverydayMisandry31/12/25 12:36 AM
1

OP said he's going to be mean against women Already said a couple times that this was wrong. At least attempt to keep up, please. he didn't say he will only target misandrists (which would be fair) but it's not like you can walk into a doctors or lawyers office and suddenly know she's sexist. Sure. You can cut down the amount of misandrists you interact with heavily if you start interacting with women less in general, though. You can't convince me he's doing the right thing. You'll note that I'v…
/r/MensRights30/12/25 02:15 AM
9

Just skimmed it. Yes, they did consider the cases where women admit to falsely accusing as to be 100% of false accusations. That's not surprising at all.
/r/MensRights30/12/25 02:01 AM
12

And I think this points to the greatest issue of all. I hear you, and I don’t disagree that life is difficult for men. But you seem to have “men have it worse” so closely tied to your identity that seeing any other viewpoint is an attack on your very character. My brother in christ, if men don't have it worse, then why do women have so many more legally recognized rights? Why are men measurably falling behind women in every conceivable quality of life metric? It isn't a core part of my identity,…
/r/MensRights30/12/25 01:42 AM
1

Look, you can argue against someone who is on your side, That's awfully presumptuous of you. No, I think I'll be the judge of who exactly is "on my side," thanks. I've had enough of being talked down to by women about issues they have no experience with. I'm assuming here, but you're not a dude, are you? No one will convince me to just hate women. Good, that'd be awful if someone could easily talk you into being a bigot. Good thing nobody has tried to do so in these comment threads. You think th…
/r/MensRights30/12/25 01:39 AM
14

It’s tricky that the logic was used in antisemitism, because the logic stands despite the message. No the fuck it does not. The logic stands just as well for my dear racist grandmother. Every time she's been mugged is by a black person, and she heard some stat about them committing a disproportionately large amount of crime, and she has verbatim made that m&m comparison, as it holds just as well logically for that scenario. It's something bigots use in an attempt to justify their bigotry, always…
/r/MensRights30/12/25 01:24 AM
14

I’d love to hear more about the nazi regime using that argument, that’s not something I’ve heard of before, and I’m keen to find out about it. Look up The Poisonous Mushroom, iirc it's an antisemitic children's book that uses the exact same thread of "logic" as yourself. By and large the system does not encourage victims of SA to report: the retraumatisation in getting a rape kit, going on trial etc is enough to deter anyone. And the fact that the US makes boys raped as children by adult women p…
/r/MensRights30/12/25 12:58 AM
1

I agree with you as well, but just being meaner to them or denying their service isn't going to change anything unless they get paid on commission. You mean like lawyers do, and some medical professionals? Nothing OP could do is going to change anything to start with, but this strategy will sure as hell make it easier for OP to avoid people who think like the one who made this post. They need to be held accountable and re-educated. If that was ever going to happen, it would've. It didn't, and it…
/r/MensRights30/12/25 12:48 AM
17

If I gave you 10 M&Ms, and I told you that 9 of them are normal, delicious, chocolate M&Ms, but one of them would kill you instantly: would you eat an M&M? The most recent modern proponent of this poison pill ideology was the literal nazi regime, though they used a basket of foraged mushroom for the metaphor. The fact that you dumbasses still use it is hilarious in historical context. Therefore the issue isn’t women: it’s men who sexually assault, and men who don’t call out behaviour that is sta…
/r/MensRights30/12/25 12:44 AM
5

The "being more mean to women" part is obviously ridiculous and I agree there, but you say the rest of this like women haven't been doing the same damn thing in terms of not willingly working with men and male professionals for decades.
/r/MensRights30/12/25 12:29 AM
3

A man making similar works of "satirical irony" would more than likely (and rightfully, IMO) raise the ever-loving shit out of your hackles. You only excuse this because a woman did it.
/r/MensRights30/12/25 12:25 AM
8

Notably the case in every US election since the mid-80s, iirc.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/25 11:39 PM
9

Source: NIH, volunteering at shelters, being homeless myself at one point, and actually living my life in the world instead of on Reddit...but I'm sure all your feels are more reals than observable reality itself! That's not really good enough, when you make claims as definitive as "3x more likely to be a victim," (lmao, and I'm sure reporting bias plays no part in this, with women encouraged to report while any homeless man would be laughed out of a police station) or talking about "orders of m…
/r/MensRights29/12/25 03:56 AM
3

Don't let them ever tell you "it's about equality." They know it's not. They'd be egalitarians if it were, and they ain't. There is a reason for this.
/r/EverydayMisandry29/12/25 03:39 AM
8

Can't wait to see the resident misandrist contrarians on this sub try and claim that this is completely fair and reasonable, lol.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/12/25 08:54 PM
1

Why not, when it often does make being a man substantially harder than being a woman, and often is explicitly women's fault?
/r/MensRights27/12/25 02:07 AM
2

Thanks, I'll be sure to check these out! I don't even need anything tame in terms of content, I just like knowing what the singer is actually saying.
/r/MensRights26/12/25 01:25 AM
1

That makes sense, yeah. Haven't listened to much of that genre since I tried a few bands and couldn't understand a word anyone said. Have any recommendations?
/r/MensRights26/12/25 12:44 AM
3

Go ahead, pull up some statistics where men get systematically murdered by close family members or spouses In the US, 2 men are killed by their wives for every 3 women killed by their husbands. And that's only the women who are prosecuted for that murder, considering that the legal system is comically biased towards not convicting women for the same crime that would give a man life+20, that should tell you something.
/r/MensRights25/12/25 10:52 PM
2

You can tell what they're saying in those songs?
/r/MensRights25/12/25 10:47 PM
2

What “reproductive” right do men want exactly lmao ? The same one women briefly had: the ability to terminate responsibility for an unwanted child. Y'know, you are allowed to simply not speak about subjects you have no familiarity with? Just a suggestion.
/r/MensRights25/12/25 09:16 PM
5

From personal experience joining a few LGBT groups as a bi guy before I knew any better, that would not stop them from talking about how awful men are for the crime of not being attractive to them, lol. So much "ugh, I feel SO bad for the straight girlies, men are so disgusting! They should all date me instead, can't trust men anyway. Sexuality is a choice when I want people to change to be attracted to me, specifically!!" was a rampant sentiment.
/r/EverydayMisandry25/12/25 08:22 PM
1

I have worked within the legal system, not directly but indirectly. Wannabe lawyers, the only demographic more annoying and unreliable than armchair ones. Perhaps you should Google those supreme court cases you spoke so confidently about earlier? Actual rape convictions are in absolute single digits, no matter the country. Yes, because so many claims are nothing but "he said she said" despite the many varieties of legal proof women can provide these days. Therefore, they get tossed out (most of …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/12/25 07:49 PM
2

The men can terminate their parental rights. There are scores of baby daddies out there who don’t pay a dime in child support. If not even children raped by adult women can do so, no. If the woman cares to pursue the man legally, she can get pretty much anything he has. Just because some women do not (usually because the man doesn't have much, if anything, to give), doesn't mean this isn't the case. At the very least, you can take that rapist woman to court, and lay your case to terminate your p…
/r/MensRights25/12/25 07:45 PM
2

Given that actual rapists don’t even pick up a charge or see jail time, our heads should explode over that too. Oh really? You've managed to prove that those men who get off scot-free are "actual rapists?" Beyond a shadow of a doubt? You ought to contact the US legal system, lmao.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/12/25 11:32 PM
28

What reproductive rights have men ever had? The abortion bans are awful, IMO, but objectively speaking, that was a right women had that men were never provided with in the first place. Heck, a woman can even give up a child for adoption with no further responsibility, but even men raped as children by adult women are forced to pay child support in the entirety of the US.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 11:30 PM
5

They're more likely to take risks aka screaming and fighting in traffic, or robbing banks. And you really think that these totally like, super common you guys!!1! scenarios explain why men are 80% of homicide victims? That's a level of delusion you don't really see, impressive. you'll never find a study that supports your claims that men are more likely to be less risk taking than women. Where did I ever make that claim? Please point it out specifically, if you feel mentally capable. Edit: and t…
/r/MensRights22/12/25 09:25 PM
8

Ah, Australia, known bastion of good gendered studies and no academic bias on that front whatsoever. That study doesn't even halfway support your statement that men are the primary victims of violence because "they’re screaming in traffick and threatening one another Willy nilly," even disregarding the obvious bias of it's source.
/r/MensRights22/12/25 09:17 PM
7

Yes men are at “more” risk but that’s more because they’re screaming in traffick and threatening one another Willy nilly. Do you have anything even approaching proof that this is why men make up some 80% of murder victims?
/r/MensRights22/12/25 09:10 PM
1

Pound sand, some portion of women being sexist jackasses doesn't mean that giving women in general the right to vote was a bad thing.
/r/MensRights18/12/25 01:28 AM
6

Door was open. Door was left open. So just taking her at her word, huh? Lmao. Poor thing, how do you survive reality with this much willful delusion?
/r/MensRights16/12/25 09:44 PM
15

This is also very we all documented. In case anyone wants some of that documentation: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122942 https://www.apa.org/monitor/2023/04/boys-school-challenges-recommendations#:~:text=Research%20shows%20that%20boys%20tend,for%20American%20Progress%2C%202017). Boys are graded more harshly for identical work, and punished more harshly for identical misbehavior. It's very easily proven, too.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/12/25 06:11 PM
46

Ah yes, the many privileges of a man working in an NGO that cares so little about them that it's willing to slash their wages to solve an imaginary issue in a bid for better PR. So true. I genuinely hope you're being sarcastic.
/r/MensRights16/12/25 08:07 AM
1

It'd be impossible for some circumstantial evidence not to bleed through, considering the sheer volume of writing we have for The Wandering Inn.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/12/25 06:18 PM
1

Technically I don't actually know pirateaba is female, just everyone assumes she is. It's a reasonably safe assumption, given how almost all of their male characters fall into the same 2 or 3 general archetypes. Still one of the best authors I've ever read, but the "write what you know" bias is somewhat plainly visible when you actually think about the specific characters in the story.
/r/EverydayMisandry15/12/25 06:01 PM
40

It's not Wikipedia it's the people who edit the page who push their agenda Wikipedia actively collaborates with universities to get woman-only groups to re-edit certain articles through a feminist lens, iirc. I can look for a link to an article about it if you like. if you look at the edit comments you can see lots of people with more neutral views get over ruled on edits. There's a reason certain ideas tend to overrule others so consistently.
/r/EverydayMisandry13/12/25 12:25 AM
52

Wikipedia ain't even trying to look unbiased these days, huh?
/r/EverydayMisandry13/12/25 12:09 AM
2

That it has to be "proved that the victims were subject to a pattern of abuse or coercive control" Not even necessarily by the murderer, if my reading is right. I suppose it depends heavily on how easily they let people "prove" that, but I don't exactly have the most confidence in the legal system's ability to not simply take a woman's word as all the proof they need. Edit: to be fair, though, I've never interacted with the Canadian legal system specifically or even really looked into it, so may…
/r/MensRights12/12/25 11:35 PM
3

This will only really be a thing in intimate partner violence scenarios. If you believe that, I've got a bridge in the Sahara to sell you.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 11:29 PM
7

I don’t think that complaining or making out like a victim is a gendered construct. It's certainly biased more in one direction than the other, though, especially when talking about domestic labor.
/r/MensRights12/12/25 09:30 PM
12

Not sure why you just make up lies and people upvote that. What, so unhappy that people didn't upvote your own blatant lies that you'll just go around accusing everyone else of succeeding where you failed? Lmao. That is the law, it is the same for a picture of a woman except that nipples also count as being a protected body part. And we both know why that is, don't we? No, she has no financial gain and didn’t use it for blackmail or sell to a website. Did you just... ignore the posts where she w…
/r/MensRights11/12/25 05:14 AM
38

the images have to show his genitals or his butthole, which they don’t That would never hold up for a video of a sleeping naked lady that was posted to fucking TikTok. her motive in distributing the images has to be: to cause emotional harm (dubious), financial gain (no) , or physical harm (no) "Financial gain (no)" is your ass high? She was constantly talking about how it would only be justice if she got to sue the guy and Doordash both, after the original post. because he falsely claimed that …
/r/MensRights11/12/25 01:00 AM
1

You're oh so good at playing the fool, can you blame me? :P
/r/MensRights09/12/25 11:48 PM
1

Ah. No counter argument. Open your eyes and read the words on your screen, and you just might see it, and if you're really lucky and concentrate for long enough to read the words. And yeah men do. Most men will never be impacted by conscription. And most women will never get an abortion, even when they are legal (as they should be, IMO). And diffetence is all those things are a result of men. MEN cause men’s gendered issues. MEN also cause womens. See a running theme? Oh dear, now you're on to i…
/r/MensRights09/12/25 11:46 PM
1

“Massive portion” so now how many men it impacts IS relevant? When the time for the draft comes around, yes. Never said it wasn't, dolt. lol source that women are the ones deciding on and performing circumcisions You made the opposite claim first, but m'kay. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8809468/ And bcs it’s not the same crime. Crimes have nuance. Good lord Not quite, please do re-read the comment again if you didn't understand the first time! Even when the exact same crime is commit…
/r/MensRights09/12/25 11:41 PM
1

Especially when you always go out of your way to act like such a fool 🤭
/r/MensRights09/12/25 11:14 PM
1

They largely aren’t, dummy. Poor thing, seems you're certainly stuck under the oppressive yoke of two sealed-shut eyelids, then? And women still don’t have bodily autonomy Lol, male infant genital mutilation, conscription, the prison labor complex. Men don't have that either :P face gendered violence and sexual crime at the hands of men far more often. Only because many reporting stats don't count it as sexual violence if the offender doesn't have a dick, and several countries make it legally im…
/r/MensRights09/12/25 11:11 PM
1

How often are you impacted by conscription If someone walked up to you and said that every second generation or so, your government would go through and forcefully enslave a massive proportion of your entire gender, how would you feel, exactly? Especially when wars seem to only be getting worse and worse for those enslaved to fight them. and usually circumcision is decided by the father and performed by men Any sort of source for that? Everything I've seen points to women being the primary decid…
/r/MensRights09/12/25 11:08 PM
1

Lol, could've fooled me.
/r/MensRights09/12/25 11:05 PM
5

Hell, a twitch streamer sexually assaulted a man with some sort of mental disorder live on stream, multiple times despite him actively telling her to stop. She didn't even get kicked off the platform, iirc, and the clear implication by the ending of the stream was that she then went on to tape him.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/12/25 07:19 PM
9

Bud, it's a social media website. Everyone, yourself included, is "hiding behind a screen." Besides, who here is saying that anyone is owed anything, besides basic human respect regardless of their gender?
/r/MensRights08/12/25 05:50 AM
1

Oh… yeah, I forgot to add the women blaming/ minimisation of DV. The only women I have blamed for domestic violence are those who engage in domestic violence? If there was any statement to the contrary, do quote it so I can edit it. I have theories on this too, but, probs not for this forum. None of your other comments in this thread are either, as you even called out yourself. What's stopping you now?
/r/MensRights07/12/25 03:42 AM
1

So when you went to read the study, and you read all of the details that is what you found ? Yes. Sometimes, people disagree with you for reasons outside of ignorance. Hope that helps, bud. The study focused on all violent crime types not just domestic crime. Coincidentally, the domestic violence part is the only one that ever makes it into the headlines. Funny how that shit works. I was attempting to discuss the actual study rather than getting railed into a gender war. And you did so by comple…
/r/MensRights06/12/25 09:25 PM
1

Of the article and those who quote it? The people funding this study, that is to say pharmaceutical companies, would love to happily drug half the population into blissful servitude, and make a killing while they do it. The feminists going around quoting it like gospel seem to want the same thing from where I'm sitting, since a drugged population is an easy population to take advantage of, and it helps perpetuate the myth that men are actually substantially more domestically abusive than the wom…
/r/MensRights06/12/25 08:28 PM
2

And I'm sure they divorce much more often for reasons totally unrelated to all that, huh? 🙄
/r/MensRights06/12/25 08:10 PM
2

Removing gender from this argument (I know I know) its not an entirely stupid idea to be offering wrap around supports including addressing the mental health needs of people. Wow, coincidentally, that's not the idea that the study you're doing a shit job of defending was trying to push. You know for a fact that you're going off-topic, both for the sub and the conversation at hand. Yet you still do it. Incredible.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 08:09 PM
1

it was more meant to grant every person, regardless of race, disabilities, gender, religion and sexual orientation the same basic rights. something that did not exist under the nazi rule. And now it simply grants those same "basic rights" near-exclusively to women. Great job Germany, so egalitarian of you. but don't confuse these times with the woke sense of equality of today. the political scene back then was still way more conservative and male dominated, women played little to no part in poli…
/r/MensRights06/12/25 08:04 PM
0

And so the very second someone wants to bypass the equality law and has even the barest amount of support, they can do so. Like, y'know, when the gender people give fewer shits about is the one that is disatvantaged. Sounds like an unbelievably piss-poor system for anyone who gives a shit about actual equality in practice, rather than equality on paper with a half dozen provisions for how to directly disatvantage men when convenient for the state.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 07:43 PM
1

a specific norm (12a) takes precedence over a general norm (3). Then why the hell even have that general norm in the first place? Sounds like all it does is look good on paper, if it can't actually manage to enforce itself.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 07:26 PM
5

but also not a easy and fast thing to do. As opposed to going against the parts of the constitution that guarantee gender equality, which seems to have been very easy and fast when men were the ones being disatvantaged.
/r/MensRights06/12/25 12:59 AM
1

Later (when I first heard of it) it was coopted by the men who used the term as a term of hostility as if able to demand recompense for the "incel" condition. And again, these men were nothing approaching any sort of organization. It was largely a handful of wackos on 4chan whose existence was widely exaggerated so that gullible folks would think it was anything like real movement rather than the dissatisfied grumbling of a few basement-dwellers. a third meaning now prevails whereby feminists/mi…
/r/EverydayMisandry05/12/25 11:44 PM
2

Yes, IIRC the term incel was originally self-imposed by men as if belonging to an organization, and there was an explicit tenet of self-declared incels that sexual/romantic partners should be provided for them by the government. No. What? Not at all! It was a term coined by a woman having trouble finding dates, that many men then used to describe their own experiences. Where did you even get any of this shit?
/r/EverydayMisandry05/12/25 10:44 PM
15

It's an actual situation that happened on r/askmenadvice one time. Fun tip, even if someone hides their comments, if you go to search their account, sort by newest, and filter by comments only it still works.
/r/MensRights04/12/25 09:02 PM
11

On a profile that looks more like an alt account than any I've seen in ages? Sure. Best of luck to yah, maybe someone will believe any of that.
/r/MensRights04/12/25 06:03 PM
30

You just want something hurtful you can say to some dude in your life who made you unhappy, don't you?
/r/MensRights04/12/25 05:11 PM
18

She'd be in jail already were she a man and her victim a girl.
/r/MensRights04/12/25 05:05 PM
40

Nobody should date a sexist?
/r/EverydayMisandry04/12/25 02:17 AM
1

i think that what men do not understand is that in most countries female dominated fields are paid significantly less that male dominated fields, Lmao, then women are welcome to get into more difficult/dangerous work that pays more, like men do. Maybe then men wouldn't be victims of 80% of workplace injuries, too.
/r/MensRights04/12/25 01:07 AM
3

Privilege of being evacuated and protected from those attacks by men who are shoved at gunpoint into the meat grinder to protect them. Better a bit hungry waiting to leave the country as refugees than gut-shot and bleeding out in the snow. And that's only for the defending side.
/r/MensRights03/12/25 02:31 AM
9

If there were no men, I really think that there would be no wars as we know them. Are you 12, or did you merely never mature past a 12-year-old's gurlz rule boyz drool mindset?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/25 06:57 PM
13

Lmao, more women than men have voted in every election in my country since sometime in the 80s. They're just as responsible for starting and perpetuating those wars as the men who are actually sent off to die in them (notably not the same demographic as the politicians that are elected, again mostly by women).
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/25 06:54 PM
2

Not in a world with so much free porn.
/r/EverydayMisandry01/12/25 04:46 AM
-2

So let me get this straight, your argument is....might makes right? And it always will, as long as you aren't the mightiest person around with a guarantee that you'll stay that way forever. Well, it doesn't make you "right," but it certainly does sure as hell make you "able to survive as an independent entity." I'm arguing on principle. Well, we certainly know you aren't arguing on facts or historical evidence :P Well...fucking duh! It's also the most popular form of economic organisation on the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/25 02:45 AM
3

imperial empires have spent their entire lifetime to shut down any attempt at a real socialist country. Lmao, if your economic system of choice can't get its ass off the ground in the first place without either foreign influence or internal strife strangling it in the cradle, it sucks. The "buh-bu-real socialism has never akshually been attempted" schlock is a meme for a reason. Besides, the person you're going to bat for is apparently an anarchist, so they'd likely think that response is as sil…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/25 02:33 AM
-1

We should abolish the draft, If your country is getting invaded, the government is going to try to draft you if you're a man, laws against a draft or no. If the laws ensure gender parity in the event of a draft, that's something, at least. end war Okay, sorry, are you 12? As long as there are at least 3 humans alive on this earth, someone is going to want to use violence against another person to solve their problems. If there's more than 2 governments, they'll probably want to do the same. dism…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/12/25 02:12 AM
1

I've always said that if you put 20 couples in a room, I'll be able to find you at least 30 people who think they do the majority of the domestic labor, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights01/12/25 01:11 AM
2

Or does that term only apply when the victim is female? By the FBI reporting statistics, yes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/25 07:40 PM
4

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/talking-about-trauma/201902/when-male-rape-victims-are-accountable-for-child-support/amp In 1996, the court heard the case of County of San Luis Obispo v. Nathaniel J in which a 34-year-old woman became pregnant after sexually exploiting a 15-year-old boy. He was also forced to pay child support, and then Deputy Attorney General Mary Roth alleged: “I guess he thought he was a man then. Now, he prefers to be considered a child.” So, bas…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/11/25 07:49 AM
13

Yeah, I've just stopped responding at this point. Guy is obviously here just to be annoying.
/r/MensRights28/11/25 07:43 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter