TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Googlesnarks Archive

View 0 posts and 229 comments by Googlesnarks on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
0

she objectively is funny then why doesn't every person on the planet think she is funny? oh right, because people who disagree with you are broken! for a second there I thought I had to be troubled with the burden of critical thinking but I gotta say I appreciate you showing me the light. props nigga, have fun.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 11:21 PM
0

I'm trying to make this as easy for you to digest as possible, and also I'm trying to level with you personally because I'm tired of being mean. pretend you bump into Steve Martin (or some other famous comedian) and get to chatting over coffee. he says "Sarah Silverman is not funny", is it that she suddenly isn't funny or that Steve Martin simply doesn't think she's funny? with no objective conclusion to the argument "Is Sarah Silverman funny?" in sight, the only thing we're left with is that op…
/r/MensRights05/02/18 10:40 PM
0

you have not proven anything other than the fact that you are a comedian and that Sarah Silverman is a millionaire. to be clear, you need to prove that your opinion is worth more than a layman's, instead of repeating it over and over like a 9 year old. proving is different from claiming but I guess you didn't actually pay attention in your philosophy classes.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 09:55 PM
0

you linked me to an article about Sarah Silverman's net worth. to be clear, this has nothing to do with the claim that "your opinion is absolutely worth more"and you are a fucking moron if you can't understand that simple fact. stop running away and prove your claim.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 09:53 PM
0

stop running away and prove your claim.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 09:48 PM
0

stop running away and prove your claim.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 09:48 PM
0

my opinion... is absolutely worth more you keep saying this but you aren't proving this is the case. do you understand the difference, little boy? stop running away and prove your claim.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 09:47 PM
0

stop running away and prove your claim. as a reminder, you are claiming that your opinion is worth more than others. stop running away and prove your claim.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 09:39 PM
0

you're like, stuck in middle school with your understanding of opinions.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 09:37 PM
0

prove your opinion that she is funny is worth more than my opinion that she is funny. you keep doing literally everything other than the legwork you need to do in order to actually justify the words you say. do you just like... fundamentally not understand what "proof" is? do I have to take you to class, little buddy?
/r/MensRights05/02/18 09:28 PM
0

I love watching morons admit defeat through incompetence. have a good one! :D
/r/MensRights05/02/18 09:20 PM
0

ok faggot let's try this again. prove to me that your opinion is worth more than anyone elses. don't just say "I'm a comedian" because that isn't justification for your opinion, regardless of how badly you wish it did. you need to prove it, faggot. in fact, since you're so ritualistically obsessed with useless appeals to authority like some tribal chimpanzee fuckface moron, how about the fact Sextus Empiricus outlined the fact opinions aren't reliable truth-seeking mechanisms like 2000 years ago…
/r/MensRights05/02/18 09:12 PM
0

that's not a proof of any sort. what should I expect, though, from someone who is so clearly a layperson to logic. at this point I'm literally playing chess with a pigeon. you do not understand what is fundamentally required of you in order to justify your shoddy opinions and also apparently don't fucking care. so, go fuck yourself, faggot. cus that's the only language you understand.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 08:53 PM
0

prove to me your opinion is more valuable than a layman. normally, logical proofs like the one I'm asking you to create start with a couple premises and reach a conclusion using reasoning and inference. you can't actually create this thing I'm asking you for, though. I know you can't, which is why instead you appeal to authority in useless flailings, with no justification in sight. trying to dress up the fact you're basically saying "I like this" when you speak about Sarah Silverman. you're a ch…
/r/MensRights05/02/18 07:43 PM
0

that's not proof of anything. I'm still waiting for you to prove to me that your opinion on art is fundamentally more valuable than a layman's. appeal to authority some more, it's not like we figured out that's a horseshit tactic two millennia ago. EDIT: I'll make this real simple for you. anything you dribble out of your dumb mouth will fail to meet the standard for "objectively reliable criteria" and is instead a really dressed up, pretty version of saying "I like this more than this". which m…
/r/MensRights05/02/18 07:31 PM
1

prove to me your opinion is actually more valuable than anyone elses. I'll wait, but I won't be holding my breath, since I know I'm asking you something you can't deliver on for a variety of reasons. someone didn't do very well in their philosophy classes.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 07:18 PM
2

no, you look like a fool and hilariously are dunning Krueger-ing your ass off as far as pure logic is concerned
/r/MensRights05/02/18 03:56 AM
9

idk man the guy on the far right looks like he could clean up just fine. I mean... look at that motherfucker lol.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 06:44 AM
27

we are in a sexual market though... and each of us is not valued equally within this market. we are treated differently based on how we are valued.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 06:41 AM
2

that's a pretty narrow minded view of a workplace relationship. you don't even know why these people ended up being paid less than they supposedly deserve. perhaps some of them weren't paid appropriately for overtime hours, perhaps others were looked over for a required pay raise due to some internal software error, or literally any thing you could imagine. when there are laws in place regulating worker pay, and you pay less then what the laws regulate, then wouldn't you know it you "underpaid" …
/r/MensRights31/01/18 06:23 PM
4

you're not even making an argument, you're just yelling that men are dumb. there's no value in your post whatsoever.
/r/MensRights31/01/18 12:21 AM
3

this doesn't even make sense lmao
/r/MensRights31/01/18 12:20 AM
1

if you see this, girl who writes, know that I love you and all your work.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 05:30 AM
2

mmmmm, nooooooo.
/r/MensRights20/01/18 05:22 AM
10

ok haulden caulfield
/r/MensRights19/01/18 03:36 PM
44

yeah if gender and race are social constructs how do we always end up blaming white men
/r/MensRights19/01/18 03:35 PM
1

you're using an argument from incredulity, which is basically piss poor. it could be so. that's all I'm saying.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 11:17 PM
1

mattress girl could get a job at Jezebel at the drop of a hat. or start some feminist site on her own due to her recognition within that community. it doesn't matter that I don't know her name. I also don't know the name of the prime minister of Australia.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 07:45 PM
1

I only know he exists because he supposedly was in game of thrones and I conveniently didn't see the scene he was in while I took a piss. I didn't want to have to explain all that, but my point still stands. she could go full Mattress Girl.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 06:37 PM
1

I also don't know who Ed Sheeran is so I guess he's not actually famous and any of his attempts to become famous haven't worked.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 04:50 PM
1

she could probably get a book deal from the whole thing in all honesty, depending on how big it blows up. EDIT: basically, fame. like mattress girl.
/r/MensRights17/12/17 12:15 PM
6

and not to stereotype but that taxi driver is probably a recent immigrant to this country just trying to fucking work and go home
/r/MensRights17/12/17 12:13 PM
1

.... y'all importin sperm over there??
/r/MensRights11/12/17 05:09 AM
1

I mean, it let's us have lower taxes, sooooo
/r/MensRights11/12/17 05:08 AM
1

source???? this is like, truly sad
/r/MensRights11/12/17 05:05 AM
5

ok and here's the crazy notion: laws change based on opinions people have. so you pointing at a book and stamping your feet at me isn't really doing much for me or this conversation at all.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 03:43 PM
5

or it could not be rape for anybody because this really isn't that important of a thing to throw someone in jail for?? maybe if you only fuck 3 people your entire life and one of those people you truly regret, you'd feel pretty weird about it. 9 bad partners out of 45 partners? who fucking gives a shit. this is blown out of proportion by our weird, puritanical notions about sex.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 03:33 PM
4

misogony is hating women, bro. misandry is hating men. we wouldn't be so annoyed with you if this weren't so obvious a mistake that you cus easily solve, but instead chose to be a dick about. use this as a learning experience.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 03:26 PM
14

Jesus, people really treat sex like it's some important, meaningful activity. have enough of it and your unfortunate drunken hookups start to mean less and less and less.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 03:22 PM
5

oh yeah I've definitely done this. I mean, you bring a girl back to wherever you're going to do it and she gets naked and now you're not attracted to her, it's a huge dick move to shut her down right before the finish line. ... I do typically perform sub optimally in these situations though.
/r/MensRights29/11/17 03:17 PM
1

what
/r/MensRights21/10/17 06:52 AM
-4

you know what's hilarious is you'd forgo all this claptrap bullshit just to fuck me. wouldn't be the first time.
/r/MensRights13/10/17 01:43 PM
6

I like how you have to preface you weren't a bad kid for smoking weed. bruh we all smoke weed lol
/r/MensRights12/10/17 02:47 PM
1

if you buy it through a small window, don't eat it
/r/MensRights08/10/17 05:11 PM
1

do you think you're weak? do you understand that even the weak can become strong? come on guy. you said it yourself, you're not having fun.
/r/MensRights08/10/17 05:09 PM
1

really though, how do you know Beauvoir fans actually behave the way you say they do? have you done a study on this or are you going off your minor anecdotal interactions with a handful of people? because it seems to me like you're making a massive overstep of your knowledge base and are literally just pulling this out of your ass so you can do... what? confirm your in biases? call someone stupid on the internet? you're a real peach. when did your wife leave you? I bet she took the kids because …
/r/MensRights01/10/17 01:28 PM
1

when I say someone "liked Beauvoir" I meant they like her body of philosophical thought, which mostly had to deal with the identity of women and how they've been characterised throughout history as being the opposite of men. that has zilch to do with stalinism or maoism, or dogmatic ideological tendencies. someone as stupid and misguided as you are could get on a pulpit and berate Christians in the same way you've denigrated the Beauvoir fans. "Christians display a tendency toward shallowness, i…
/r/MensRights01/10/17 01:18 PM
1

you've moved your goalposts now. originally, anyone who likes Beauvoir's philosophy is likely to be stupid. that's what you said. suddenly you've pulled your own foundation out from under you.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 10:34 PM
-2

hurrrrr just like being Christian is huuurrrr EDIT: you basically are trying to conflate morals/politics with intelligence. good fucking luck with that bro
/r/MensRights30/09/17 08:35 PM
-1

Jesus Christ I can't believe I have to untangle this for two autistic people. I am consistently disappointed when people are interested in Simon Beauvoir, and that isn't exactly something that comes up in natural conversation within 3 minutes. that's it. you can't tell if someone is interested in Beauvoir in any given 3 minute conversation, and liking Beauvoir has nothing to do with someone's mental capacity. my opponent is looking for any reason to feel better about himself this morning and cho…
/r/MensRights30/09/17 06:43 PM
-1

ok, you're not actually going anywhere with this and just wanted to insult me for no reason whatsoever. that's pretty pathetic bro.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 06:39 PM
3

right and within the first few minutes of meeting anyone I always make sure to bring up philosophy regardless of what we were talking about. furthermore, you're basically saying anyone who likes Beauvoir is stupid and I could be equally as pedantic towards anyone who likes any philosopher if I tried hard enough. are you trying to say girls are stupid without actually saying it? cus I actually don't take that too kindly.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 04:48 PM
1

right and within the first few minutes of meeting anyone I always make sure to bring up philosophy regardless of what we were talking about. furthermore, you're basically saying anyone who likes Beauvoir is stupid and I could be equally as pedantic towards anyone who likes any philosopher if I tried hard enough. are you trying to say girls are stupid without actually saying it? cus I actually don't take that too kindly.
/r/MensRights30/09/17 04:47 PM
3

you can't exactly tell from someone's physical appearance what mental hobbies they have
/r/MensRights30/09/17 02:50 PM
3

whenever a girl tells me she's into philosophy. "ah so like Hume, Camus, Wittgenstein, Kirkegaard and Locke?" "nah I like Simone de Beauvoir" .... fuck me lol
/r/MensRights30/09/17 01:45 PM
1

please give us a link for the lazy
/r/MensRights25/09/17 04:16 PM
3

what's the likelihood of you getting robbed at gunpoint whole sitting on your ass pushing DVDs into the TV? if you even go that far. I bet it's mostly Netflix now. you don't even have to bend over at the waist. that's why they get paid more.
/r/MensRights23/09/17 03:09 PM
1

you're actually doing a "but what about the womynz" post that feminists consistently shit all over us for supposedly doing. ask a feminist why that's offensive and they'll lay out the whole argument for me.
/r/MensRights18/09/17 01:42 PM
1

dude I'm sorry to hear that. I hope they figure something out for you
/r/MensRights18/09/17 01:40 PM
35

got it, being a malnourished man weaker than most men you see is fucking scary, even here in America. like do you think every man is a beefed up Adonis?
/r/MensRights18/09/17 01:56 AM
4

I think the guy is just awkward and confused
/r/MensRights18/08/17 02:59 PM
1

realistically you cannot take anything on a case by case basis
/r/MensRights10/08/17 02:56 AM
0

these replies of his literally mean nothing. he cannot actually criticize anything because to do so would reveal the folly of his position. so, you can pretty much ignore this fucking moron.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 07:25 PM
1

"I wonder what happens when you take a gas proven to retain heat and start flooding it into our atmosphere at the rate of billions of cubic meters, to levels that have never been seen in millions of years" "probably fuckin nothing" again, this is what you sound like right now.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 07:15 PM
1

"97% of doctors think it's a bad idea to stick leeches directly onto your fucking eyeball" "well, obviously, they're all dumb, all of the studies saying leeching your eyeball are flawed" that's you. that's what you sound like right now.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 07:12 PM
1

The warming evident in the instrumental temperature record is consistent with a wide range of observations, as documented by many independent scientific groups.[33] Examples include sea level rise,[34] widespread melting of snow and land ice,[35]increased heat content of the oceans,[33] increased humidity,[33] and the earlier timing of spring events,[36]e.g., the flowering of plants.[37] The probability that these changes could have occurred by chance is virtually zero.[33] ──────── that last ci…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 07:07 PM
1

yeah you're a shill troll
/r/MensRights09/08/17 06:55 PM
1

The warming evident in the instrumental temperature record is consistent with a wide range of observations, as documented by many independent scientific groups.[33] Examples include sea level rise,[34] widespread melting of snow and land ice,[35]increased heat content of the oceans,[33] increased humidity,[33] and the earlier timing of spring events,[36]e.g., the flowering of plants.[37] The probability that these changes could have occurred by chance is virtually zero.[33] that last citation, n…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 06:52 PM
1

honestly, just the Wikipedia page for gonna warming should be enough to convince any reasonable person. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_warming dispute all of this point by point. I'd seriously absolutely love this.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 06:48 PM
1

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's Fifth Assessment Report sounds like a good place to start. you are claiming you are better at spotting poor methodology than every scientist on the planet. prove it, faggot.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 06:45 PM
2

well at some point there really is nothing to do but make fun of you for saying things that are so patently retarded. plus, I feel like no matter what I say, you'll never listen, because you have no respect for academic integrity. if you did, we wouldn't actually be having this conversation right now. and I did link to a study, you're just a moron.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 06:43 PM
1

"muh methodology" if you would be so kind as to elucidate, exactly, on the methodological failures of the Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change's Fifth Assessment Report, I think the world would really appreciate your esteemed insight. you seriously are on the verge of a Nobel Prize of you can pull this off.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 06:42 PM
1

honestly, the absolute best part about science is that if you think everyone has done bad science on this topic you yourself could do the good science and show them to be wrong. seeing as there's probably a fucking Nobel Prize on top of an overwhelming, global sigh of relief to be had over showing the world that climate change isn't real, then it seems to me like there would be a legitimate, well funded, concerted effort to do those studies. so, where are they? can you show me even one study wit…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 06:17 PM
5

"These findings have been recognized by the national science academies of the major industrialized nations and are not disputed by any scientific body of national or international standing." but YOU are clearly more knowledgeable about climate change than literally every expert on climate change that exists on the planet. of course! how could us leftists be so stupid!!! I fucking despise you.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 06:08 PM
2

how about the idea that professional scientists are better at spotting shoddy methodology than either of our stupid asses, and the absolutely overwhelming majority of climate scientists are in agreement about the situation pretty much shuts the door on this problem the same way it happened with evolution by natural selection. but, no! you are clearly the superior mind! you obviously are more competent than highly trained professionals working in the field they desire to work in! if only us pathe…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 05:53 PM
2

that's... absolutely fucking not true???? why do you think every climate scientist on the planet is on board with this idea???. because they're a sinister cabal of liars trying to get themselves pay raises by inflating a problem that doesn't exist? yeah and i bet we never landed on the Moon, either.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 03:25 PM
7

I vividly remember the moment when, for the first time in my life, a woman yelled a compliment to me across the street. I was 22.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 03:11 PM
3

who hurt you?
/r/MensRights09/08/17 03:04 PM
2

not even the common courtesy to give a guy a reach around. I would have had such a hard time not laughing my ass off every time that dude opened his mouth. "sir! you are eloquent and hilarious, sir!"
/r/MensRights09/08/17 03:04 PM
1

good for you guys? you're wrong. I'm simply a stoner, stumbling blindly into a conversation on my way to a home Depot to buy shit for my new yacht. sorry if I'm not the villain you wanted me to be.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 03:26 AM
1

you should not quit you day job in order to pursue your passion of assuming the thoughts of strangers
/r/MensRights20/07/17 03:21 AM
1

I had 2.5k a month in passive income, which was pretty comfortable in my area. I'm by no means a spoiled brat. I was living the peasant's dream.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 02:03 AM
1

.... yeah, sure, because you should automatically assume malicious intent instead of ignorance. Occam's razor and whatnot.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 02:02 AM
1

right, that's exactly what's happening here. because nobody makes mistakes!
/r/MensRights20/07/17 01:45 AM
1

I completely 100% realize that. I was literally living the fucking dream. and I was also incredibly depressed. I had no goals, and waking up every day without needing to pursue anything wasn't helping me set them. your mileage may vary obviously but I feel like there is an uncomfortable quiet on top of the mountain. I should also mention that I wasn't making millions, just enough to not have to work. maybe $2.5k monthly.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 12:38 AM
1

seems like you're the jackass here not willing to discuss anything.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 12:36 AM
1

because no other completely normal human being has ever misunderstood something.
/r/MensRights20/07/17 12:11 AM
1

cyclone and sweep are both popular skills in the game, had to ask.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 10:58 PM
0

you misunderstood what I mean by "nothing to do". I'm talking about Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs type shit. when you are making enough passive money to never have to lift a finger for anything. it was seriously depressing because I didn't have anything to struggle against, and the struggle is what we're here for in the first place. we're never satisfied.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 10:57 PM
1

I thought we were talking about the past the whole time :/
/r/MensRights19/07/17 10:55 PM
1

so you've never felt obligated to act differently around someone who is financially supporting you? this is as simple as not making fun of someone for something as hard as you wanted to because they took you out to dinner that night and you don't want to be a complete dick. this is not a complicated notion.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 10:51 PM
1

that's... not at all what I said lmao.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 10:50 PM
1

I uh... thought we were talking about the past in the first place. we weren't :/
/r/MensRights19/07/17 10:45 PM
-1

oh, of you want to be a stay at home wife, then awesome! the thing was this wasn't a choice for women because they didn't get jobs for a bit there. that was the problem.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 03:01 PM
-2

they were, at one point when they couldn't get jobs for themselves, forced into marriage so that they don't die from not being able to buy food.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 03:00 PM
-6

there's also the fact that if you can't get a job, you can't survive by yourself. so you have to latch on to someone who has a job so he can keep you alive. this system forces women to marriage. I want to survive on my own, thank you very much. I can understand completely why women would want the same thing.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:58 PM
-7

to visit my friend who bought me a plane ticket?????
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:57 PM
-11

then don't do what? marry a man so that I can survive because I can't get a job because I'm a woman??? sorry, I need to survive, and I need money, and they don't hire women so I need a man to be nice enough to me to give me money in exchange for raising his children. the problem with that system is that it forces women to marry, because they don't have enough reliable alternative options. now that they can work, they don't have to marry because they can make enough money to survive by themselves…
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:55 PM
-63

except, when they couldn't get jobs, they had to marry in order to have any money via the man making money and giving it to them as an allowance so, actually, in order to SURVIVE, they did have to marry.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:51 PM
1

do you play Path of Exile by chance?
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:47 PM
-2

and all of that was pretty much up to the man's discretion. I wouldn't want to live my life on the off chance I was going to be treated nicely. I would want to ensure I lived a good life on my own, freely, with my own fucking money. your are a blind fool if you don't instantly understand this.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:46 PM
-33

he definitely has some semblance of power over you based on this. how could he not? he may not exercise it, or realize it but your relationship is fundamentally asymetrical in regards to financial authority. the same way when I visited my friend in California on his dime, he had power over me. not a lot, mind you, but I felt it.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:44 PM
-1

unless it's not because your finances are actually separate????
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:41 PM
-2

yeah I can also decide to change the entire system :) they decided to change the system, for better or worse, and I completely understand why they did it.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:40 PM
-3

I don't know about you, but I was completely fed up with having to ask my parents for money when I was 13 years old. now imagine having to ask for money for everything you've ever wanted, even when you're a grown adult. and you wouldn't want to change that system???? yeah, ok buddy, you're basically a fucking sheep then.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:37 PM
-12

the option that you don't know how to read isn't on the table? weird that you'd arbitrarily limit the available choices to make yourself look good, you false dichotomy motherfucker ;)
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:19 PM
-1

.... no that's pretty much exactly how it was. if you ain't got nothing for yourself, you rely on someone else to give it to you. that fundamentally asymetrical power and finance structure is something I would have wanted to alleviate for myself, if it were the case for me.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:16 PM
-11

maybe you should learn how to comprehend language lmao
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:14 PM
-132

"being kept in a house because you don't have any financial freedom to pursue whatever interests you, without negotiating for an allowance from someone who now has authority over you by virtue of them having all the money and you not having a fucking job" you're a dipshit idiot if you can't see the problem with this. you know who else stays in the house with no resemblance of an income or responsibility? CHILDREN. being treated like a child when you are actually a grown ass adult is a fucking pr…
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:11 PM
-37

you can't freely spend money that isn't yours. unless someone gives it to you, but you have to negotiate with that person for an allowance. like a child. I can absolutely see why women wanted that to change and you're all idiots if you can't, sorry fellas. this doesn't erase the notion that suddenly doubling the work force by adding women to it was the worst thing that happened to the lower classes wages, which I'm still salty over, but I would have done the exact same thing probably. being a pe…
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:05 PM
-6

you've clearly never actually had all the done in the world with nothing to do. it's depressing AF.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 02:03 PM
8

it's honestly like people think the world bends over backwards for white men when really we're treated like completely regular, unimportant assholes.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 01:46 PM
28

isn't "having a father" one of the biggest factors in a child not turning into a criminal?
/r/MensRights19/07/17 01:39 PM
-175

yeah that sounds great except you have no financial freedom and are basically someone's pet.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 01:37 PM
1

yeah, you clearly have no idea what's going on here.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 10:48 PM
1

then you're an idiot because morals are relative. if they weren't, you could prove it. and then you would win a Nobel Prize because nobody before you has ever managed to do this.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 05:09 PM
1

oh so you don't think morals are relative? then what exactly are you durdling over? you guys are clearly objectively wrong, it is a heinous crime to fuck anyone below the age of 18 and the fact that your laws don't reflect that means your society is fundamentally dog shit. EDIT: bruh you have no idea what's going on here do you.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 03:57 PM
1

man, you are right on the knife edge of being smart and somehow end up fucking it up. most people your age on the internet are like that, I've noticed.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 03:51 PM
1

look at the 14 year old who just figured out morals are relative and is exercising his newfound angst in the least productive way possible.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 03:30 PM
1

you sure you don't want to go down to 9? I mean, that's when Mohammad married his daughter so according to Islam that should be ok. fuck your European laws bro nobody gives a fuck.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 02:18 PM
1

zombie apocalypse Oh, I put a bullet through my own brain the moment some worldwide apocalypse scenario rears its head. I'm not egotistical enough to want to see how well I can "hack it" in that situation. and suicide is probably preferable to all the other ways I'd likely die.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 02:01 PM
1

I read another story they other day about this 16 year old church piano player who ended up hooking up with his pastors hot 36 year old wife. the point was ultimately that since the boy is young, his blood is up, and she's a hot older woman, that there are very few scenarios where she comes on to him where he would actually be able to refuse her. if you can't actually refuse her advances, it's not truly consent. and it's because of his hormones that he cannot actually refuse her. and that's why …
/r/MensRights26/06/17 01:48 PM
1

and the US as a society decided he isn't. now, do you want our two societies to fight each other to see who's law gets to stand? how else do we solve this discrepancy???? maybe by shutting the fuck up and letting us govern ourselves? ok cool, thanks.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 01:41 PM
2

you know you are actually very bad at explaining your points in a coherent fashion and you would have been much better received in this thread if you hadn't acted like a smarmy cunt, hiding half of the critical information you needed to express in every post so you could give off an air of Ivory Tower style aloofness. all of your bleating falls on deaf ears anyway. you chose poor tactics in an unfriendly environment. you're wasting your time.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 01:34 PM
–

you know what he meant faggot
/r/MensRights26/06/17 01:28 PM
2

oh so you're just a fuckin anarchist? well I'm only legally technically not allowed to torture you in my basement so maybe we can figure something out with that. ah fuck I keep forgetting new Orleans doesn't have any basements. we can't even bury our dead, they rise back out of the ground when it rains.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 01:24 PM
1

so at what age should adults not be allowed to fuck children, in your opinion? or can we slippery slope this all the way down to toddlers using the exact same language you've been spilling out here? you're really trying hard to muddy the waters on this. nobody appreciates your philosophical nuance on this issue.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 01:18 PM
1

no, it's because you haven't done anything in this thread but show you're a jackass, and it hurts us to read your drivel.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 01:16 PM
2

did you really just try that strategy? Jesus bro. it's not like we're talking about weed over here, we're talking about statutory rape.
/r/MensRights26/06/17 01:11 PM
3

or my 35' sailboat anchored off the coast of Catalina island. .... which isn't really anything to be proud of. the boat only cost like $7k and it doesn't cost any money to anchor out. I'd recommend it.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 03:44 AM
3

sadly some of us get old enough to vote but end up being fucking morons like you, and people like me now have to bear your retarded burden.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 02:29 AM
3

I replied last with some pithy remark- that means I'm the victor on this day. if you reply again it's pretty much just your potent insecurity.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 02:19 AM
3

oh so you're just a moron, ok. that makes more sense.. because if an intelligent person said what you said I'd have to be concerned. but some retard? all is right with the world.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 01:56 AM
4

you're too stupid to understand that class is more representative of your life experience than your gender or race???? and that there's a difference between some rich assholes having power and you having power because you have a penis????? because you have like, no power at all.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 01:19 AM
3

you having a penis doesn't mean you're not a wage slave to your corporate overlords. you are a powerless peasant. just like all the other peasants. that the corporate overlords all primarily have penises shouldn't matter at all to you. the fact that you care more about gender than class is exactly what's wrong with feminism lol.
/r/MensRights25/06/17 01:06 AM
1

eithsr?
/r/MensRights02/06/17 06:26 PM
21

did you watch the documentary? I suggest you actually watch the documentary.
/r/MensRights29/05/17 03:53 PM
21

"feminism is actually kind of shitty towards men"
/r/MensRights29/05/17 03:21 PM
7

was anyone else watching as the "not batshit crazy" feminists outright denied the existence of the problems men are trying to bring awareness to? that woman who was dressed like a librarian and that guy who laughed too much when he talked both basically denied the existence of female perpetrators of domestic violence. that's just straight up denying reality. this was not a balanced look at two sides of an argument. this was a scathing criticism of the feminist position.
/r/MensRights26/05/17 10:51 PM
1

nice tone argument faggot
/r/MensRights22/05/17 01:18 AM
1

last time I checked being skeptical of what looks like an absurd sob story was actually a smart idea. the content just hits close to home for you guys so you're overriding your critical thinking skills to confirm your own biases, i.e. that this film is so emotionally powerful it can reduce a family to tears. like it started with "The Red Pill is a good documentary" and now it's this guy saying it got his whole family to cry and cold-turkey an ideology. this doesn't look like a fucking joke to an…
/r/MensRights21/05/17 11:31 PM
1

and nobody gives a fuck what you think. crazy talk over here lol. EDIT: "I never pay attention to my critics", true sign of the intellectual.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 07:58 PM
0

so you can't at all imagine someone reading your title and thinking it's satire? maybe that's your personal problem.
/r/MensRights21/05/17 07:46 PM
1

it sounds like some shit someone would post to see how much we'd eat up. "too good to be true"
/r/MensRights21/05/17 07:26 PM
-1

they couldn't have all cried lol
/r/MensRights21/05/17 06:43 PM
1

what color scheme does make you think "this guy is reasoned", why do you think that, and why do you allow these sorts of thought to persuade your greater critical faculties?
/r/MensRights14/05/17 01:58 AM
1

I had to post that shit on Facebook once I saw that, my jaw hit the floor. like whaaaaaaaaaaaaaatttttt
/r/MensRights23/04/17 01:12 PM
3

I saw that you had posted it down below as well. I appreciate your diligence! my favorite is the California Senator against violence in video games who is sent to jail for WEAPON TRAFFICKING.
/r/MensRights23/04/17 01:03 PM
1

what now about anti gamergate rapists???
/r/MensRights23/04/17 12:52 PM
7

"When you're born you're nothing but a fleshy ball of weakness. your parents look at this and say 'Not weak enough! we can make this even weaker by training it Pavlovian to respond poorly to certain audio stimuli!'. If they never had done this you would be better off. someone could walk over and say 'What's up cunt?' and you'd be like 'Oh, my name is Rebecca! but I could see how you got this mistaken I have a face that looks like a lot of other faces. welcome to Salt Lake :)'
/r/MensRights11/04/17 12:47 PM
3

sorry to double reply to you, but: take a look at this political cartoon this cartoon is specifically targeted to Islam but it is fundamentally the same argument no matter what population of people you levy the criticism against. in the same way I am filled with anger and frustration at the population of Christians in america when some ignorant couple stomps on their infant to death in order to "exercise the demons within her" for implicitly supporting the worldview that demons can exist and tha…
/r/MensRights26/03/17 02:27 PM
2

I think what he's getting at is you don't need feminism explicitly to handle these problems because most normal, decent human beings (read: most americans when the rubber hits the road) are against things like sexual assault, rape, and domestic violence. kind of like how you don't need a church for a community to do the things that churches do to tie communities together. you can accomplish that using completely secular methods.
/r/MensRights26/03/17 02:05 PM
1

quick question: is there any mention of our right to reproduce in the american constitution, or any other government legislature? or is that such an automatically assumed thing that they never would have thought to have actually granted it to us? i am clearly not a lawyer or anything, but aren't all my other rights granted to me from some document? I'm american.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:20 PM
1

hey I did that! it was a fantastic choice! it cost me $10, took half an hour, and the guy who did it for me is an amateur magician so he even did a magic trick for me at the end. now I am freeeeeeeeeeeeeeee! let's seriously ask ourselves: are your specific genetics so absolutely necessary to pass down that you are willing to keep yourself under the thumb of your hypothetical oppressor, or do you think you will be just as personally fulfilled and satisfied raising a child you have adopted? are yo…
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:17 PM
1

HA!
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:09 PM
1

she legally gets three strikes too.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:08 PM
3

source?
/r/MensRights21/03/17 01:18 AM
1

"it may not have gone down that way" then why are we even having this conversation, LMAO. it may not have even happened! I don't care, I still want to talk about it. so either we talk about the story or you can fuck off, no offense.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 01:59 PM
1

isn't this where we insult the farmer for becoming a farmer as opposed to an engineer in the same way we insult the liberal arts major for getting a poetry degree and not an engineering major?
/r/MensRights17/03/17 01:55 PM
1

and yet at the same time Texas isn't exactly the pinnacle of our nation's education system, is it? although Austin has the highest percentage of it's population with bachelor degrees, Texas also has towns like Lobbock with the highest rates of teen pregnancy in the country. also no offense to you religious folks but all the fucking mega churches aren't really pushing the ball in your favor here
/r/MensRights17/03/17 01:53 PM
0

why does the repo guy taking possession of a car someone else no longer legally owns something that must be stopped using deadly force? this is absolutely insane.
/r/MensRights17/03/17 01:50 PM
0

your car's getting repossessed and you're upset enough with the repo agency to kill a man over it. some dude comes to steal your car at night. let him steal the car so the repo company can't take it. the end of this game results in you not having the car anyway. you are going to lose the car. might as well keep it out of their hands as well. jk nah I'm just gonna kill a man
/r/MensRights17/03/17 01:46 PM
1

well if I make it seem that your fundamental assumptions are absurd, and can do it in one post, would it not be efficient to attempt that tactic? like come on man I have a sense of argumentative strategy lol
/r/MensRights17/03/17 02:30 AM
2

how is your life in danger because of a guy outside of your house is mucking about in your car??? has your life ever actually been in danger? breaking into your home at night in a no knock warrant raid (basically a fucking b&e) is an entirely separate situation from a guy outside your house not interacting with you at all. like god dammit, my roommate was shot through my front door in the knee after he pushed an armed person out of our house while I was 10 feet away falling asleep to Shaolin Soc…
/r/MensRights16/03/17 03:59 AM
2

he knew it was going to be repossessed. he premeditated the murder of the repo guy to get back at the repo company he had beef with. apparently his petty squabble was more important than that dudes life. also apparently not following protocol for repoing a car means your life holds no value. this is truly a barbaric act and that guy should go to jail. you need to look in the mirror and ask yourself how much you value the lives of your fellow man cus from the way you talk it doesn't seem like you…
/r/MensRights15/03/17 11:45 PM
1

he didn't.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 10:47 PM
1

ah. I see what you mean. yeah if you shoot a gun you generally have to have a pretty good excuse for it
/r/MensRights15/03/17 09:44 PM
0

I'm saying we have and can used warning shots to deter assailants. it's not Hollywood power fantasy bullshit. you will still be charged with firing a weapon within city limits, or whatever else. but it's illegality is a different thing than it's efficacy
/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:23 PM
23

that man is a murderer. all he succeeded in doing was killing a man. did the bank suddenly decide he didn't owe them money? what all does this accomplish? fucking redneck asshole gets to go to sleep at night thinking he committed no wrongs by premeditating a murder. disgusting.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:09 PM
1

we've been firing rounds across each other's bows for centuries. it's a legitimate deterrent.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:06 PM
3

does shooting at this man make it so that your car is no longer going to be repod? this guy is a fucking murderer. cold blooded murderer who solved absolutely nothing.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 08:05 PM
1

there's also far fewer photography and photography teaching positions than the are students of photography.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 05:07 AM
1

because you love teaching more. I don't understand why you're operating on the false dilemma that a human being is only capable of being deeply fascinated by one subject. you can have a passion for photography, teaching and brazilian jiu jitsu all at the same time. also I feel like the majority of photographers who don't make any money doing photography do not teach photography. I'm pretty sure those people are working at bars and restaurants primarily.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:57 AM
1

can you prove this as a fact or are you going to merely restate it hoping my intuition guides me into agreeing with you? because i see merit to the claim from a purely intuitive standpoint but I am a logical rigorfag and must hold my ground in thinking you are making wild claims about reality you cannot support.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:48 AM
1

or what you understand to be a rule simply isnt one.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:36 AM
1

you do understand that you're making claims about reality you have absolutely no way of verifying right? people can be great at more than one thing. like why do I have to even explain this to another adult. the guitarist for iron maiden also works for fucking NASA. but apparently he can't be very good at guitar because he has a passion for astrophysics, right??????
/r/MensRights15/03/17 04:00 AM
1

it's like the difference between reading a book in your hands vs your cell phone. your cell phone is clearly better but we still prefer books
/r/MensRights15/03/17 03:57 AM
1

or their passion for teaching.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 02:52 AM
1

anybody who works on digital lol. you don't need a darkroom because photoshop exists. people use film to try and feel cooler than they actually are. it's ultimately impractical given that you can't even see your results until many moments later. i more specifically went to film school and the transition to digital was the best thing that happened to the industry imo. nobody wants to get called back to do reshoots when you could have reviewed the footage on the spot instead of 3 weeks later after…
/r/MensRights15/03/17 02:51 AM
1

that guy should be in jail!
/r/MensRights15/03/17 02:48 AM
1

you do know all the ivy league schools are in massachusetts, right? and wall street is in new york. what exactly does the bay area have besides rich yuppies who think crystal healing is real?
/r/MensRights15/03/17 02:46 AM
2

yeah cus it's real ass backwards to want paternity rights. it's real ass backwards to complain about the disparages in criminal sentencing between men and women who commit the same crimes. it's real ass backwards to complain about the inaccuracy of the Duluth Model and how it renders millions of male and lesbian domestic violence victims invisible by omission. it's real ass backwards to complain about the growing levels of distrust that women are beginning to show men, to the point of prejudice.…
/r/MensRights15/03/17 02:43 AM
1

better yet, why are you using a darkroom? spend $4k one time and pick up a cheap Nikon with some rocking glass and look up guides on youtube. crazy idea, look at pictures that are famous. fuck around with your camera until you make your shit look kind of like that shit. congratulations you're a photographer.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 02:35 AM
1

what's critical in our economy is food, infrastructure and energy. very few people feel compelled to interact with art in a meaningful way but all of us have physical needs. aesthetics are #1 lmfao tell that to the A10 Warthog and all of its devoted fans.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 02:32 AM
2

it doesn't matter what his job is, the dude isn't wrong. most people who go to school for arts degrees end up in the service industry. can confirm: I went to film school and guess what all my friends do now? I'll give you a hint it has very little to do with film.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 02:28 AM
2

the fuck does his portfolio have anything to do with it? he might not be a very good artist with or without formal training. it always fascinates me that every person who suggests a concept must 100% act as an example of that concept. you say someone can be good at art by learning about it? well that must necessarily mean you are an amazing artist and if you suck your idea is necessarily false. god damn people that's not how it works at all lmao.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 02:27 AM
1

you named three people as if this defines the trend lmao what a fantastic sample size.
/r/MensRights15/03/17 02:25 AM
1

have you ever considered for a moment that to some people money is not the end all, be all of their existence? that some people find it more fulfilling to pursue other things instead of money?
/r/MensRights15/03/17 02:23 AM
6

aww come on guy :/
/r/MensRights04/03/17 03:24 AM
2

what I'm saying is I could write a treatise on the nature of romantic love, a long, detailed and elegant explanation of how I will liberate her body in rising passion, unlocking the infinite supply of orgasms she holds within her. I mean I could spill out a romance novel right here as an example but it doesn't matter. the point is it wouldn't work. and I'm not ugly.
/r/MensRights04/03/17 12:00 AM
5

ha, fair enough. so 3(?) years ago I'm sitting on my foam-slab (you can by mattress quality foam direct from the manufacturer, cut however you want it. I had a king size slab 6 inches thick for $100) playing Dark Souls when I hear very loud, staccato bursts of air pressure. seeing as the house across the street from me has had a crew of mexican men working on it for months I was thinking to myself "Geeze, those guys must be having fun with the nailgun!" and then I hear the distress sounds. just,…
/r/MensRights03/03/17 11:54 PM
1

how many tinder profiles have you seen being openly frustrated by the amount of hook ups they get propositioned with? for me it's literally 100% of the girls I match with.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 10:10 PM
1

I've been with many times the national average sexual partners and blunt propositioning has worked exactly none of those times.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 10:05 PM
-2

tinder isn't a hook up app lmfao
/r/MensRights03/03/17 10:01 PM
1

dude women on tinder are not looking for sex. are you on tinder cus you sound like someone who doesn't fucking use it.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 09:59 PM
2

do you start a national conversation about how women shouldn't approach men in public, or give them compliments without asking beforehand? no?? right. that's the difference. you don't preach a standard of behavior for women that you yourself do not uphold universally. as opposed to the women who turn this kind of stuff into a national tragedy.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 09:55 PM
12

to wit: a couple nights ago I made eye contact with a nice young lady across the street, and as we passed each other I turned back to see her also turning back to look at me. called her over, got her number, and we had some sex that night. but I should probably also mention that this is so extravagantly rare it doesn't even make sense. like she must have been one of the 1-2% of women who are right swiping with me on tinder in the first place.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 09:17 PM
13

7%??? you know that actually sounds about right. I'm 6'2", long luxurious "get commented on by strangers in public" hair, lean physique. my opening picture is a pic of me hanging horizontal off a rock wall on a strict v5 bouldering problem in my short shorts. and I get fucking jack shit for matches. striking out again and again and again. multiple days in a row using all of my daily allotted swipes. fuck me I'm probably lucky if I get 7% returns
/r/MensRights03/03/17 09:00 PM
1

I thought you were making a joke about 5!, the mathematical notation of "!" suggesting that you multiply 1 x 2 x 3 x 4 x 5 = 120. god I'm such a loser
/r/MensRights03/03/17 08:56 PM
11

i personally do not feel like I'm gonna last long on this planet. old age isn't going to look good on me. so I am pretty dissatisfied with the state of affairs as of now.
/r/MensRights03/03/17 07:41 PM
4

are you a 10/10 model?
/r/MensRights03/03/17 04:58 PM
106

finally someone else mentions this! I felt like I've been taking crazy pills. I remember in Middle School, where my mostly female teachers were basically reiterating to us through numerous magazine articles and whatnot that "men want women who are beautiful" and "women don't care about your looks and care more about your personality" and I felt almost ashamed? like for some reason it was made out to be like men were worse than women for being interested in looks as opposed to "what really matter…
/r/MensRights03/03/17 04:36 PM
1

mmmm but it's not. the patriarchy is the borderline undefinable bogeyman, like "the man" and "the system" only it makes men the enemy of the progressive as opposed to rich people who control the economy. like it's called patriarchy, not "rich-people-triarchy", that's why we don't like it. the gender of the person holding you by a leash really shouldn't matter to you, the slave of the leash.
/r/MensRights16/02/17 02:44 PM
29

not really the same, no. "patriarchy" is the notion that men are unilaterally on top of the world which is simply not true at all: see any married man who has realized his life is easier if his wife is happy with him, and the state of the average West Virginian poor person. so inequality and double standards are what we on r/mensrights feel is the more accurate term to describe reality, "the patriarchy" is the nebulous enemy of the nebulous-cloud-ideology of feminism and you cannot discard it or…
/r/MensRights15/02/17 02:36 PM
4

I got into an argument with a girl who agreed that the problems I suggested exist do in fact exist and are problems.... but the moment I was like "how do we solve these problems" she basically called me a piece of shit and said this is why everybody hates white men. as if paying lip service to my problem was enough.
/r/MensRights13/02/17 12:17 PM
1

your opinion is a microaggression against me because it implies the notion that I am not objectively right
/r/MensRights31/01/17 05:13 PM
1

I obviously had to research this and now I'm watching Yuri Bezmenov tell me about how most of American culture is the product of a manipulation campaign
/r/MensRights31/01/17 01:17 PM
1

I got a vasectomy for $10!
/r/MensRights29/01/17 11:21 PM
8

do we really have enough grievances .... yes. I really, truly think that we do. the only way you can decide for yourself is if you look at the list of grievances tho.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 04:58 PM
9

hey man! nice to see you stop by. the attitude you're having right now is literally the exact same one I felt when I first heard about this place when I was 18. I thought it was a joke, absurd! then I started reading. I don't want to tell you what to do cus I'm not that kinda guy, but check the sidebar links and peruse a couple of the grievances we have. you may, like me, realize this isn't a bad place full of bad people.
/r/MensRights29/01/17 04:35 PM
1

aaayyyyyyyyyy this guy
/r/MensRights25/01/17 08:50 PM
1

oh I'm not saying he didn't look bad. it was pretty childish. I listen to death metal and wouldn't even say that lol.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 06:06 PM
2

this is a pretty unfair challenge for me personally because I listen pretty much exclusively to scandinavian death metal and have no interest in the music that is considered popular. i think the obvious implication is that he doesn't respect rap as an art form.
/r/MensRights15/01/17 03:28 PM
3

you know there's this thing called projection and I think you did it. see, this guy insulted the art of rap and you read into it that he is referring to black people instead of people who choose to pursue rap, and called him a racist. what you did was racist because when he said "mentally challenged children" you thought "black people". you're a racist ignorant fuck! (the better tactic would have been too question the veracity of the idea that rappers are de facto retarded)
/r/MensRights15/01/17 02:14 PM
1

forging legal ground is scary. precedents are rough
/r/MensRights13/01/17 12:51 AM
-4

and that's your opinion on the matter. unfortunately you do not have the final word and, technically, nobody does.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 09:44 PM
11

I can definitely see an argument worth having on that topic, certainly.
/r/MensRights12/01/17 04:05 PM
96

I mean I get prosecuting the bartender whos job it is to make sure people don't get too drunk to drive, but a patron who has no such obligation? what the fuck
/r/MensRights12/01/17 03:22 PM
-4

you might be mad because human rights is a made up subjective pile of garbage that humans generally enjoy, and not some objective facet of how the world works.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 01:57 AM
0

how would you know that? I've never met a Muslim in person who was interested in conquest. perhaps this other individual has lived a life a lot like mine.
/r/MensRights04/01/17 01:55 AM
15

baby raping wasn't the best analogy for this.
/r/MensRights03/01/17 01:53 PM
18

you've just committed the No True Scotsman fallacy, r/MensRights favorite logical error in large part due to the ridiculous amount of times it happens on this sub. please educate yourself on why the No True Scotsman is a logical mistake, and apply that knowledge to the future so you can say less things that are obviously wrong. the entirety of our species appreciates you trying to be a better person :)
/r/MensRights03/01/17 01:52 PM
2

... wait. isn't cigarette smoke unhealthy? so avoiding it would be more desirable than not?
/r/MensRights21/12/16 11:12 PM
2

it's pretty easy to argue for using a combination of goal orientation and accomplishment as the rubric. like, it probably isn't a good idea to abolish the EPA if you are interested in having your own clean drinking water. seeing as some peope want to abolish the EPA it's as if they do not care about their own clean drinking water, which is in my opinion against their own self interest, because you need clean water to live. i mean it's pretty basic stuff and you're just getting all muddled up ove…
/r/MensRights21/12/16 11:08 PM
6

the Democratic republic of Congo has a rape rate of about the same. there, rape is used as a weapon of war.
/r/MensRights06/12/16 12:28 AM
4

you already come here for the counter to popular narrative stuff. and yet you freak out at the alt-right moniker like a bogeyman.
/r/MensRights29/11/16 11:10 PM
1

and what fraction of people undergoing sex change surgery do not have gender dysphoria?
/r/MensRights21/11/16 08:08 PM
1

and i think what this guy was trying to say is that men are always just gonna outperform women in video games, the same way we outperform them in lifting. I'm ok with that, and I think any mature person should be ok with that. women don't have to be as good as men are at everything, and men don't have to be as good as women are at everything. to pursue that as a goal is outrageous. EDIT: I mean, we could also look at chess as another example of the inequality between genders. name a world famous…
/r/MensRights21/11/16 08:04 PM
1

I want off Mr. Bones' Wild Ride
/r/MensRights05/10/16 04:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter