TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

GorgonzolaJam Archive

View 1 post and 300 comments by GorgonzolaJam on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
114

misandryGorgonzolaJam/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/26 06:20 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
15

How do you think women have been mistreated for centuries? Better than men. Men were required to die very ugly deaths in wars. Women weren't. Men had to go out into the unsafe world and make a living at a job that was most likely dangerous. Women didn't. Women had (yes) to stay home, get to raise their kids and socialize with their friends who are also raising kids. Nearly no danger to what is very satisfying and meaningful work. But how do you think the ladies feel when they are not included in…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/26 11:35 PM
9

If her venting breaks sub rules, then no. It should not be allowed. Especially since men are FAR more likely to kill themselves. I'm really sorry to hear this. It's not right for this to happen to one of your supports.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/26 11:31 PM
11

The woke (intersectional feminists) constantly project. It's a major psychological component of the "movement".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/26 11:29 PM
23

The patronization is the same as racists too. Ever consider that it's primarily women who are telling men how to act? How to behave "properly"? How "not to rape"? The way that feminists talk to men mirrors the way white supremacists of yore talked to the "Negro race" on how to "civilize themselves". Can you imagine the Left coming out with "toxic blackness"?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/26 11:23 PM
23

I was just banned from a sub that claims to be a safe space for feminists to "call out" misogyny but is actually a space to demonize, belittle, and dehumanize men with other feminists, all of whom are telling each other that their hate is good, their hate is acceptable, their hate is righteous. My comments were civil, rational and empathetic to men but completely intolerant of their displayed bigotry. I was banned for "incivility".... All the bigots rolling in their hate like a pig in shit? That…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/26 11:20 PM
1

It's like being an athiest in a country ruled by religion. Absolutely agree. Or like an anticapitalist in America. I just posted a new discussion asking what would the world be like without a feminist bias in academia. I'd love your thoughts on it!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/26 10:57 PM
3

Take a look at the homelessness report out of York University. It's on this website, which carries the same bias. They refuse to acknowledge men are the primary victims of homelessness and HIDE the fact that men are primary victims by splitting up the demographics into "LGBT", "Indigenous" and age demographics (young and old) without EVER giving a stat on how many men are homeless (I think it's buried in a footnote on the last page of the report.) This is when I became truly anti-feminist: when …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/26 10:39 PM
1

That and supporting the ethno-nationalist sentiments of Canada's indigenous peoples. "We own the majority of the landmass of Canada" they say to the PM, and he agrees. I'm willing to bet most Canadians consider the majority of Canada to belong to, y'know.....Canada..... and that those who are fine with this will be quick to change their tune the moment they live outside of The City and actually see the structural inequality (like racially-segregated schools and medical offices) that arises from …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 11:40 PM
2

Carney was a central banker. Anyone who thought he was going to be anything but a "feminist" Harper was deluding themselves from the start. Oh, but "elbows up!". All it took was a few comments about Trump and everybody rushed him into office. It's actually embarrassing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 11:37 PM
4

As a Canadian, it's entirely typical. This is the same "feminist" government that promised 99% of Canada's foreign aid would only go to women. Because boy soldiers are just going to grow into "toxic men", right? I've written civil, informative emails to the Minister for Gender Equality on multiple occasions and I have never received even a form letter. Their arrogance knows no bounds. There's nothing to listen to because we're not wrong; we're "misinformed".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 11:35 PM
14

Good reasoning and layout. The only reason people don't (usually) do that kind of stuff anymore is because of the modern techno wonderland MEN toiled away to build. Reminds me of a cartoon where a guy is fighting someone else outside a cave/hut/castle/house as time progresses. Each time period, the woman from inside the domicile asks "Is it safe yet??" and the man fighting says "No!". Finally, we get to modern times and the guy's able to say "Yes!" to the question. So the woman comes out, hits t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 11:28 PM
2

which is why women can or are obligated to serve in some militaries This may have changed recently but last I looked, even women in the IDF are NOT put into combat positions.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 11:40 PM
2

Pro-choice is pro-women's choice. It's a system wherein women get to choose for men whether or not they'll be financially supporting a child for 18 years. A man has no rights when it comes to abortion. So the title is still correct - women have more legal rights than men. And far, far more social rights. However, Trump's invasion of the Supreme Court and their decision on abortion was horrific. Nobody should feel forced to carry a child to term - that's body horror nobody should have to suffer.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 11:39 PM
3

The whole Woke thing is exactly that. I can't pretend it's just a theory in my mind anymore. This all started right around Occupy Wall Street. We were starting to discuss the 1% and create class consciousness. The rich got scared and used social media to divide the working class. We were so close to a society where everyone knew about the exploitation of the working class, the 1% and how our society is entirely created around benefiting the rich. While I embrace personal freedoms, much more good…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 11:35 PM
2

noone has gotten drafted since Vietnam. Which is a more recent injustice than women being denied the vote but feminists will never fail to bring that up as an excuse to hate men. Men's problems = more than 60 years ago, who cares. Women's problems = more than 100 years ago, EVERYBODY MUST CARE.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 11:30 PM
4

Another way in which men have less rights: procreation rights. A woman has the legal choice (in most Western countries) to abort a fetus, to abrogate any responsibility for the child that would grow from that fetus. A woman also the legal choice to not abort a baby AND make the "father" (sperm donor) pay for HER choice for 18 years. A man cannot force a woman to abort a baby, which is right. But a man also cannot similarly abrogate legal and financial responsibility for that fetus. A man cannot …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 11:28 PM
2

It's a bad argument. Ask them if a black trans man have more power than women. Because when they shit on "men", they're shitting on black people, trans people, disabled people, suicidal people, poor people and people who are all of those at the same time. They're all men too and feminist intersectionalism denies that they have more power than white women. It's just an excuse to hate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 11:25 PM
1

let's let russia win so they will genocide Ukrainians What a disgusting thing to say to you. It's against sub and site rules so flag the comment for mods if you find it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 11:22 PM
37

Grasping for ANY counter to the fact that men kill themselves more and grasping for that counter-argument because she knows the only other option is to feel empathy for men and that's simply not an option. All these younger feminists that have based their personality and ego around "Feminism" since 2016 are going to be life-long feminists. The ego death required to admit that men are abused by society as well, and that feminists have been BULLIES to men for the past decade, is too large to hold.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 11:18 PM
54

As someone who has dealt with thoughts of suicide, I can tell you that men are successful more when they try because they know nobody's going to care if they ATTEMPT a suicide. So when the doctor asked me "Have you attempted to commit suicide?" as if this was the only test to the depth of my depression, I told her / snarled at her "No, I haven't TRIED, because when I do commit suicide, I'll just do it in a way that ensures success. Then she threatened to have me committed. (And showed more conce…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 11:14 PM
70

They're already "on the right side of history". It's not that this sub and feminists disagree with each other; it's that we don't understand feminism well enough and so that's why we disagree don't agree with them. Every data point about how society mistreats men is wrong, or misogynist, or "they don't have to debate nonsense with you", or "they won't waste their time arguing with you", or...... They're religious fundamentalists.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 11:10 PM
3

Yes, feminists ignore these women because they're inconvenient, I agree. These are women who are happy doing domestic work and, just as you described, have no desire to climb the corporate ladder or be a "professional". They want to watch their kids grow up. That's what I wanted too. I just have to bear all my neighbours and townsfolk thinking I'm a lazy slack-ass because I'm raising my kids at home. Feminists don't represent these women and have no interest in doing so. Yet another way they are…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/26 08:32 PM
1

The vegetarian arguments that got me were (1) the environmental impact of meat and (2) that as sentient beings we know harm is being (needlessly) caused and so we have a duty to reduce that harm. I still eat meat, though. Just less than I used to.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/26 08:28 PM
1

I'll have to take this with a grain of salt. No offense, but you're a rando on the internet but even worse, this seems to confirm something that I have suspected for a long time: academia is misandrist, especially in the social science, and that this misandry / female bias is severely warping the data that comes out of gender studies.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/26 08:25 PM
1

LIUNA Non-unionized. They didn't pay me either....
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/07/26 08:20 PM
2

I worked at a union job on an industrial site and was given safety lessons, PPE, everything I needed. A man still died there every 7 years on average. Later I worked for a construction company who told me to use a pick to clear out concrete that was four foot deep. When I asked for safety goggles, I was told to "close my eyes when I swing". Yeah fuck that.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/26 01:04 AM
2

Because Israel's actions created a critical mass that could not be ignored. The more we talk, the more we write, the closer we'll become.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/26 01:01 AM
3

"Ask any woman you know; they will have experienced male violence. People will agree to a lie if it means supporting their "tribe". She (or he) is doing a post hoc rationalization to justify hatred of men. The cognitive dissonance of believing yourself to being morally superior, on the "right side of history", while espousing and defending hate must be severe. No wonder they're so touchy when people question their beliefs. Reminds me of the good ol' days.... So, if you're fine with eating lobste…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/26 12:33 AM
12

Most of this list could just as easily apply to the woke / ctrl-left. Which makes sense, since they are just intersectional feminists. It's a secular religion and they use the tactics of religious fundamentalists to defend it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/26 12:27 AM
18

I've saved this. Thanks so much for typing it out; it will make a wonderful resource. 37-39 is something I've been thinking about a lot. There's a wealth of "studies" to show that women are poor oppressed creatures bravely fighting against an enemy who's both all-powerful and craven at the same time because how could "gender studies" have any other output? No wonder there's a dearth of male-specific studies; it's probably career suicide pursuing such a line of study and would hurt future opportu…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/26 12:25 AM
15

Feminism lacks class consciousness because it's about making things better for women, not about making things better for everyone. Women are less affected by labour issues than men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/07/26 12:13 AM
1

So how do the rich benefit from a socially and legally acceptable hate site? One that promotes the regressive viewpoint of the ctrl-left in which our differences are closely guarded (and monetized), hate in the right direction is socially acceptable and even encouraged, and creates perhaps irreparable damage to healthy gender and racial relationships? I mean, why would the rich want the working class to divide itself into in-fighting units that focus on the slight differences in privileges among…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 11:37 AM
2

RIP r/menkempf. It's a sub where they'd take misandrist statements by feminists but change "men" to "Jewish people" or "black people" to show the massive imbalance in empathy. Reddit banned it, of course. It was too effective an argument.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 11:22 AM
1

It's a way to write. It's another to develop ideas by responding to comments as well as debating and contributing ideas rather than just thinking thoughts in my head. Also, praxis is more efficient here.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 11:21 AM
1

It's hard not knowing if / not being able to prove that misandry plays a part here. The first time the (female) doctor at the hospital showed concern is when I said when my wife was waiting in a car outside the hospital. Me suiciding? No big deal. My wife bored in car? ALARM BELLS!
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 11:17 AM
8

You're assuming it is to "shut women up". The corporate internet is misandrist. It's easy to prove. Go on twitter and post #KillAllMen and watch yourself NOT get banned. Subscribed to FemaleDatingStrategy on Reddit, which is virulently hateful towards men. Somethingsomething insta or facebook. The corporate internet accepts misandry but guards against misogyny. A lot of times in debates when women tell about downsides of dating for them This is generally code for "demonizing men". Misandrist wom…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/26 11:28 PM
10

Are these "reactionaries" using the month to gasp talk about men's issues? Your post reads like a feminist victim-blaming dead men. The "actual work" reads like a feminist too, one that's ignoring the institutional support for queer and women's events.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 11:39 PM
10

I was banned from r/depression for making a post questioning whether the sub was healthy when there is post after post after post asking for help, begging for help, and there's nobody answering. I can tell you that such an experience just makes the depression worse.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 11:36 PM
17

A reminder that 91% of men who suicided asked for help first. Dead men get victim-blamed for suicide constantly by feminism, even though men kill themselves at more than TWICE the rate of woman. (In Canada, it was five times as much as women in 2020.) Nobody is asking why this is happening to men because asking why requires empathy and nobody is interested in extending empathy to men. They are too comfortable using them as scapegoat for the state of the world. Thank you OP. As someone who has (s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 11:35 PM
1

Okay. Personally, I try to pick my battles. You want to be your most effective because otherwise you end up (accidentally) hurting the movement. A post of someone being clearly hateful towards / dehumanizing women is not a good place to bring your argument against misandry. There are many, many, many, many other places on Reddit in which you can object to misandry. To be clear, I am NOT saying that hate justifies hate, just that choosing your battles is an important skill to learn.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 09:20 PM
2

Thank you for the reminder. It's been a while since I read my Picture Bible.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 09:18 PM
15

r/misandry was occupied by takeittocirclejerk, who mods at MensLib. This guy doesn't believe misandry exists and occupied the sub just to stop people from using the term. Then his hold on it lapsed, it was re-opened by the right kind of people and then immediately banned by admin for no reason. Why? Because Reddit is a hate site.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 09:17 PM
1

That's not what happens, though. I mean, look at feminism. If hate speech against men weren't allowed, then feminists wouldn't be so hateful. Hate always has an excuse, and it always finds a place.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 09:15 PM
3

Sorry are we talking about age verification for social media? Because I ABSOLUTELY support that. Social media is used to bully kids, warps their brains, and makes them into terrible democratic citizens.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 09:14 PM
11

"To be clear, what Stöckl’s data showed was female victims of homicide were six times as likely as male victims of homicide to have been killed by an intimate partner. It did not show that females were six times as likely as males to be killed by an intimate partner, nor that six times as many females are killed by an intimate partner. This is why stats shouldn't be used to prove things, honestly. I'm not a stupid man but stats are a weak spot and I had to read the latter statement three times b…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 07:12 PM
5

But you don't have absolute free speech because we're talking on a corporate internet. So, as stated, many countries other than the US have laws against hate speech and so they can perform praxis on this front. Plus, I don't think it should be legal to call for the death or dismemberment of a particularly demographic so I guess we disagree on absolute free speech.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 06:57 PM
2

The Bible includes subjugation of both men and women because it's a (imo) somewhat historical record and the rich have subjugated the poor for all of human history. However, it can't be denied that the Bible shows women clearly having less rights and freedom as men. The space they could occupy, physically or intellectually or socially or profesionally, was much tinier than even a poor man's. Did YHWH pick on first-born sons? Yes, but that's not evidence that the Bible doesn't contain misogyny as…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 06:54 PM
4

I think you're being disingenuous and making a bad argument. You've linked to hate speech against women from 4chan. If you want to advocate that 4chan be listed as a hate site, be my guest, but that's not the point of this post.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 05:54 PM
7

Men are born men. Christians choose Christianity. I support respect for people's religious beliefs - until they start trying to impose their beliefs on other people. Someone calling Bible stories a myth isn't hate; it's objectively accurate. They're not myths to you but they're myths to everybody else. Kali? Myth. The Raven? Myth. Mithra? Myth. Jonah and the whale? Myth. What you need to understand is that your beliefs are YOURS; nobody has an obligation to respect them, but it is politeness to …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 05:47 PM
7

Not everybody is American so, no, I'm not going to prioritize American politics over men's health and safety What other groups do is their business. Clearly identifying hate sites against men is part of the work of this sub. The public consciousness needs to accept that "hate against men" exists and if a government, any government, recognizes this, it will save men's lives. Globally. America's not the centre of the world.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/06/26 05:42 PM
7

Wow, that's even worse. On the English one, they can barely confirm that misandry even exists and then recently a feminist added a link to a report called "The Misandry Myth", which SOUNDS like they're saying misandry is a myth. The report claims feminists aren't any more misandrist than non-feminists. I still have to debunk it. It's on my list.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/26 06:32 PM
14

Check out the wikipedia article in misandry. I mean. If your blood pressure can take it. It's pretty galling.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/26 01:44 AM
11

"They don't tell anyone because of toxic masculinity so it's their fault." Everything bad that happens to women is men's fault and everything good that happens to women is women's fault. Everything bad that happens to men is men's fault and everything good that happens to men is misogyny.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/26 01:43 AM
28

Jesus, what about the 13-18 stats? 78% and 86%? These are still children! It's very telling that feminists never ask WHY. Black-on-black violence? We won't assume it's because of their race so let's ASK WHY! Indigenous alcoholism? We won't assume it's because of their race, so let's ASK WHY! Male-on-male violence? "It's because men are bad and don't talk about their feelings."
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/26 01:42 AM
8

Every person that exists today does so because one of their ancestors was better at killing than the person trying to kill them. We are ALL the product of violence, a violence for which men were bred and used. Now that men have created a society wherein there is significantly less danger to people, this violence is no longer necessary and men are castigated for being bred for it when they used to be celebrated (at least those who didn't die while holding their steaming guts in their hands, cryin…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/05/26 01:06 AM
5

"How To Win While Appearing To Lose".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/26 11:57 PM
12

Shorter lifespans due to (1) being murdered or (2) stress from fear of being murdered. .... Very "natural".
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/26 11:56 PM
1

Men and women experience sexuality differently.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 11:36 PM
4

friction of men refusing to adapt to a world where women are no longer forced to be the prize for economic participation. LOL feminist again. Y'all are so easy to spot! Just look for the demonization of men! This was never a world. You're just creating feminist fantasies for yourself. Also, "refusing to adapt" is such slanted language. If American social conservativsm took root, would it be that women are "refusing to adapt to a world where men are once again respected"? Ugh, they're so backward…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 11:36 PM
6

Women now make up around 44% of all entrepreneurs and own 40% of small businesses. Yeah owning a shopify site while your husband makes the majority of the income technically makes you an entrepreneur... Also, women have way more advantages in starting a business. Better rates, more grants, more mentorships. Just like in every place where feminists want to game the system and create a outcome.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 11:32 PM
10

Everybody is incentivized to work. You are, for instance. Your incentives just may be different.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 11:30 PM
11

Young women are already being raised to hate men and young men to hate themselves. The corporate internet is incredibly misandrist.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 11:29 PM
4

In order to do that they have to increasingly not care about what other people say or their opinions, and focus just on the results. In other words: men will become even more capitalistic. Looks like a good outcome for the capitalists. You know, the ones who buy and control troll farms and create dissension on the internet between various factions of workers? Yeah. Those.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 11:29 PM
–

Well, I can tell this is a feminist perspective because it's completely centered around women. However, built into a man's ability to do work is a whole is something called social reproduction, which is all of the labor which allows work to happen Single men work. Therefore, social reproduction is a bullshit concept. Well, that was easy. Also, emotional support, The idea that men don't emotionally support women is so disingenuous that it, too, must spring from a feminist mind. We never say it is…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/26 11:27 PM
6

Good work! After bookmarking, I went to archive this post and it was already archived 3 times. :) Another resource: Book of Men's Issues
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates25/05/26 01:51 AM
1

Fair enough. I'll use it myself. Let me ask you: Do you think MLE refers to dating or friendship?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/26 11:56 AM
1

While people older than you may not be able to speak to the social media dynamics, they can still ground the conversation in normal human behaviour - y'know, that which has been perverted by our society's (harmful) addiction to social media. It's important that this thread be maintained lest we become more and more warped by this technology that's obviously harmful but nobody is willing to give up because addiction.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 11:34 PM
1

Useful paper, thanks. However, there was only one example of a woman tying off a man's penis. I understand how easy it can be to exaggerate, especially when we know how often feminists exaggerations are believed and instituted as "knowledge". The only way through this, though, is by setting a better example. By exemplifying integrity, since it's a classic male virtue and something that feminists lack.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/26 10:14 PM
1

MLE What's that? I looked it up and it give me a term from statistics that didn't seem to apply but I suck at stats so maybe it does.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/26 09:53 PM
1

Any evidence for that?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/05/26 09:52 PM
7

In our society, a man is too intoxicated to consent when he's too intoxicated to get hard. Because if he could get hard, he would obviously consent to sex, right? /s
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/04/26 12:41 AM
4

A lot of redpill men here act rude towards women for daring to have different opinions to them. Yeah, I would be fired if I dared utter any of the many valid criticisms of feminism. So I don't have any sympathy for this post because you're complaining from a place of privilege. Secondly, So yeah if I seem unsympathetic maybe look at your own behaviour 🤦‍♀️ This is often the excuse I hear from misandrist feminists for their misandry.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/26 12:33 AM
12

Roughly 29% of marriages are now considered egalitarian, where both partners contribute roughly equal (40%–60%) income. The share of marriages where the husband is the sole provider dropped from 85% in 1972 to 55% in 2022. Do you not see the contradiction in these two sentences? They're painting very different pictures. If 30% of households are egalitarian, then the 55% stat is just for households where the wife doesn't work --at all--. So if she has a part-time job, or a side hustle selling sew…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/26 09:32 PM
11

The fact that we live in a feminist society that furthers the many privileges women already had?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/26 09:27 PM
21

It's always men's fault because they've convinced themselves that men shape society. If societal attitudes harm men, then it's 'men harming men'. This is why the myth of "patriarchy" is so important to feminists: without it, they can't blame men for everything wrong in society.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/04/26 09:25 PM
2

According to feminists, the reason for the higher rate of domestic violence among lesbians is that they suffer from internalized misogyny. It's always men's fault.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/26 11:35 PM
3

the reasons why men do it is what matters Feminists don't ask why men are doing it because they already know why: because men are worse than women. That's why you'll see feminists embrace the idea that the indigenous only have high rates of alcoholism because of intergenerational trauma and colonialism. Black people only have higher rates of crime because racism. But when it comes to men and violence? crickets Nobody asks WHY men are more likely to murder because it doesn't make sense to ask a q…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/26 11:32 PM
8

"Patriarchy" is just a word feminists use to blame men for the crimes of the rich. Feminism lacks class consciousness.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/26 11:06 PM
2

Meh. Reading the wiki description, she was describing a VERY specific kind of woman. Does our society admit that these women exist? No. But that doesn't mean her descriptions are applicable to all or most women. That kind of thinking leads to bigotry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/26 11:06 PM
1

I thought it was motte-and-bailey but it was cluster B disorder all along.... Thank you. It's been obvious to me that feminism, as a "movement", is governed by an unhealthy framework and you've just put a name to the condition. The gaslighting and projection are intense among feminists. Everything feminists have accused men or MRA's of has been exhibited by themselves time and time again. (Not women, mind you, but feminists.) The idea that people's brains can re-structured by an ideology - beyon…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/26 11:02 PM
3

Consent is a woman's right only.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/26 10:51 PM
7

Good breakdown. Feminism depends on "toxic masculinity" to decrease criticism of feminism. Male feminists: See, if you're a tough, hard man who protects women, you won't be bothered by #KillAllMen because (1) you're tougher than that, c'mon bro, and (2) because women have been abused throughout all of history and we have to allow them to be bigots for the scales to balance. Never mind that there's no end point to that bigotry in sight and allowing it is selling a generation of boys down a river …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/26 10:49 PM
5

Dogs are good.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/26 10:44 PM
3

I call myself a male advocate and refer to what we do in this sub as male advocacy. It avoids taint.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/26 10:37 PM
0

Consent is only a women's right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/26 10:34 PM
2

I will never understand why people will cry about FGM, but not give a second thought to mutilating boys’ genitals. Because girls and women are more important than boys and men. That's the "equal rights" that feminism has brought us.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/26 10:32 PM
11

include banning coordinated attacks on social media against female candidates and journalists, So female politicians get a free pass from criticism? That's not exactly pro-democratic.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/26 10:30 PM
18

"If you're not a terrorist, this vast reduction in civil liberties shouldn't bother you." You're the voice of regression. Merely disagreeing with feminist rhetoric is considered misogynistic. I should know; I've been called such enough times merely for rationally and critically opposing feminist stances. This is a serious attack on people's free speech and ability to criticize a movement that has become more about female superiority than equal rights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/26 10:29 PM
3

Great then when anyone commemorates soldiers, we no longer have to say "men and women" and can finally be honest and just say "men". Same with firefighters and cops.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/04/26 10:25 PM
-1

Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequence. Yes, it is. "Freedom of speech is a principle that supports the freedom of an individual or a community to articulate their opinions and ideas without fear of retaliation, censorship, or legal sanction." Next time you want to weigh in on a subject, try thinking about it first instead of just regurgitating a line you heard the cool kids say.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 02:17 PM
9

On this one, where demonizing women results in a ban but demonizing men is not considered an offence?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 02:16 PM
5

It's okay to say #KillAllMen on social media but not the opposite. Please take an honest look at the world around you.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 02:15 PM
8

LOL It's not against Reddit rules to say bigoted things about men but it is against their rules to say bigoted things about women. Feminists see victimized men as a threat to female victims. The empathy gap is very real.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 02:14 PM
14

You can say that men are responsible for the vast amount of inventions We can all say it; we just don't. It's not considered polite society to say good things about men but it's okay to say bad things about men.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/26 02:11 PM
66

Yes, it's a question that starkly reveals the empathy gap that men face. Men aren't people to feminists but oppressors. It's more important to maintain men's status as oppressors than it is to recognize the ways in which our society harms men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 01:14 PM
85

"The Future is Female" is a slogan from an essay by Sally Miller Gearhart, where she proposes that the male population be reduced to 10% to create peace on earth.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 12:33 PM
90

It argues the epidemic of male violence and harassment against women in public spaces is a major breach of women’s human rights Men are twice as likely to be attacked or murdered by a stranger. Women fear crime more than men even though men are more likely to be victims The feminist response to these facts is that the violence is perpetrated by other men. Full stop. As if the attacker and victim sharing a gender means it's not a problem. That's because feminism is a philosophy of female supremac…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/04/26 12:30 PM
5

Here's some stats for you: https://www.openaccessgovernment.org/article/male-victims-of-intimate-partner-violence-insights-from-twenty-years-of-research/193401/ https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Donald-Dutton/publication/238509810_The_case_against_the_role_of_gender_in_intimate_partner_violence/links/5c4659f1299bf12be3d9eb2b/The-case-against-the-role-of-gender-in-intimate-partner-violence.pdf?origin=publication_detail Donald Dutton has done a lot of work in this area and has testified in Cana…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/26 01:36 AM
6

Damn that's a good point. You can't suicide twice but you can have multiple attempts. Give me a bad argument and I can rip it apart but I struggle with statistics.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/02/26 01:26 AM
67

Yes it is about having male friends, but if they said that it would humanize men and humanizing your enemy is dangerous for morale. Also feminists (1) always contextualize male problems by how it affects women and (2) believe that men being victims hurts women. Bit of a tangent, but for example when you bring up male suicide being 3x the rate of women, a feminist will always respond that the rate of "attempts" are higher for women. The Canadian government's suicide page even felt the need to sho…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/26 10:16 AM
–

Ah, motte and bailey. Which horse were you speaking of, then? The whole “younger women are more impressionable and easy to manipulate” thing comes straight from the horse’s mouth, OP was talking about men over 30 in general and then you say the above, NOT "some men". (Another instance of you deciding to change what was said in your favour.) Then you re-write (again) what some other guy said (from "agreeable" to "easy to manipulate") with the comment that "they" won't use the word 'manipulate' bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 02:40 AM
–

It's not just idiotic, it's an example of bigotry.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 01:57 AM
–

men do not like fertility at all. Ah, so you're a bigot. "Men are evil or men are evil. You decide." You're demonizing men. You just write totally fictitious generalizations about all men as if it's established fact Deranged attraction to children is inherent to male nature So grown woman lusting after teen boys in boy bands or popular movies are secretly gay men?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 01:56 AM
–

I was 18 and having sex with woman who were 50. Did they manipulate me?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 01:48 AM
–

You talk about an infamous video of a RedPill and then feminists generalize it to mean all men. Feminists have a problem with NOT demonizing men.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 01:48 AM
–

Wow that's a feminist-level inference. From "easy to impress" to "manipulate". It couldn't have anything to do with the fact that men have to run the romance train and trying to impress someone who has been on hundreds of dates is a lot more difficult than someone who's been on less than a hundred. Naw. Let's just assume men are inherently evil. Sure it's bigotry but it's socially-acceptable bigotry. If your friends are doing it, that make it ethical, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 01:45 AM
–

Yeah it's getting pretty ridiculous. I remember in Fauxmoi a discussion about a lead singer in a band and how he was "grooming" 25 year olds. Or a woman saying she was 22 and with a guy who was 30 and he "groomed" her. Learned helplessness is a helluva drug, I guess. I've never tried myself. I remember there was this conventionally attractive "lunch girl" who sold sandwiches at our office for a few years. She went from ~20 to ~24 during that time and the change was absolutely noticeable - and it…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/26 01:42 AM
1

I replied to you multiple times? I don't read usernames. I wasn't even aware that's a thing people do. Anyways, if you were wrong multiple times, that's probably why I replied to you multiple times. ;) The hysterical bit was me being a bit cheeky, hence the emoticon. That's an awful lots of stacked emphases for someone who's not hysterical.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/26 02:26 AM
13

If planning a date and having confidence is such an issue for y'all, stop going on dates. Complete lack of empathy for men. Complete lack of response to the content of his speech. Confirmed: Feminist.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 04:34 AM
3

Once again, this is how men portray themselves. Willingly, voluntarily, and free of coercion Yes, all men, all the time. It has nothing to do with your perception or confirmation bias. Nope. Honestly, someone should tell you: you're getting a bit hysterical about this. :D
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 04:33 AM
9

You'll start having empathy for men when ALL men, EVERYWHERE, think the way you think they should think? It's funny how often I'll see feminists say they care about men and then a comment like this comes along....
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 04:32 AM
15

This is like the capitalist's definition of "choice", wherein homeless people "choose" to be homeless. If you don't act in a traditionally male manner during courtship, then it most often goes nowhere. In a society where men are assumed to be the "freer gender", this is unacceptable hypocrisy.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/26 04:30 AM
1

I remember a time when only certain people discussed the socio-political. You know, people with the interest, intellect and mental training to talk about the fabric of our society with reason. Then social media. Suddenly, everyone is in on the discussion, whether or not they've had formal or informal training in How To Think Logically. That's when the socio-political became more like sports rivalries because much like most people who engage in sports rivalries, they are TERRIBLE at the activity …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/26 03:59 AM
1

shrug You being insulted doesn't change what I think. Try an argument next time. :)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/26 03:54 AM
9

I would physically feel myself cringe Same. I would have a visceral, physical reaction to hearing feminism being criticized. When I agreed with that criticism, I would feel sick to my stomach and hate myself for doing so. Having also gone through this "de-toxing"/de-programming on another tightly-controlled opinion of the Left, I'm given to feeling that the Left has socially-engineered me for most of my life. The woke / ctrl-left didn't invent this - they're just preying upon the Left's tendency…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/02/26 03:40 AM
6

Teach boys not to rape The first time nobody spoke up against this misandry is the day a generation of boys were doomed to think badly of themselves because they were born boys. Your post reminds me of EJ Dickson, Senior Writer at Rolling Stone, who wrote: there is strong evidence that our society is so steeped in toxic masculinity, so drenched in the primordial ooze of white male supremacy, that it doesn't matter how many dolls you buy your kid or how many times he reads A Is For Activist. A wh…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/26 12:03 PM
2

I feel like I've seen a post like this before? Either way, the guy is sympathizing because they want your vote. The NDP had a policy convention where white men were asked to wait until "under-represented" people had a chance to speak. They are unmistakeably woke, which means feminist to the core. One of the NDP's leadership candidates (Tamille Johnston) is a de-facto ethno-nationalist who previously worked for a health authority dedicated to providing better access to care ("Doctor In A Day") to…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/26 11:48 AM
10

Menslib is politically center-right because it seeks to maintain the status quo, which is demonstrably feminist. And because it quashes any dissent - from the feminist norm, yes, but free speech is classically left-wing. Honestly, that sub turns my stomach in the same way that any group desperately clinging to faith-based beliefs would. At least the Christians house and feed people. ...The majority of whom are men.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/26 09:11 AM
10

You can't use the word "woke" now, and you haven't been able to use the word "SJW" for a good decade - both of which describe the same thing. Also, not uncoincidentally, you can't criticize what you can't name. Denial that the Left has been hijacked by short-sighted, terminally-online, emotionally-reasoning, out-group hating regressives whose only accomplishments to date has been to divide the working class and get Trump elected.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/26 09:05 AM
2

I just use "men's advocate" and let my words speak for themselves. And this sub's numbers, despite it being spread largely through word-of-mouth, speaks to how strong the movement is.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/26 08:57 AM
1

They're also harmful because they promote corporate media - in particular a company that's creating a near-monopoly on it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/26 08:54 AM
3

Recently I personally discovered how methodically cruel human beings can be when it serves their own interests. It was difficult to internalize that the same kind of casual cruelty I had dealt with 30+ years ago on the schoolyard could still be present in adults, some 20 years my senior. I watch anime and there's this recurring theme of "demons" among us. Not Christian demons, though; these demons appear as humans but don't have any capacity for love, kindness or laughter. This idea has been rea…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/02/26 08:48 AM
19

From The Declaration of Sentiments: The history of mankind is a history of repeated injuries and usurpation on the part of man toward woman, having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over her. Ironic, then, that the reason women have rights is because men decided to give it to them. It tells you how ignorant feminists can be of female privilege when they talk about "fighting" for rights. What fight? What battle? What war? Those with power have only ever relinquished some o…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/26 12:33 AM
9

Or Sally Miller Gearhart, who wrote an essay from which the phrase "The Future is Female" was coined. The essay proposed that society reduces the male population to 10% of society through cloning and ovular merging.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/26 12:27 AM
13

Same reasons I stopped calling myself a feminist by about 2016 - watching feminists drink from "male tears" coffee mugs really brought it home. I also agree that women still face gender-specific injustices as well and I still challenge myself with radical empathy for those who would be fine with my death or sterilization. Feminism hurts men. I'm an egalitarian, a humanist, and a men's advocate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/26 12:22 AM
20

The woke won Trump his second presidency - there's no doubt about that. The DNC definitely won his first, though, by screwing over Sanders.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/26 12:18 AM
5

why teachers have been loathed. They can't be fired. If they're disciplined for, say, telling a child that she's a "shit", parents don't get to know if they are disciplined or what the measures were. They constantly complain when they have the best work/life balance in that salary bracket. They're over-paid, especially rural teachers. They're complicit in a racist school system that prioritizes the education and health of one ethnicity over every other Canadian. (Or, according to our vice-princi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/26 12:16 AM
14

University of York released a study on homelessness in Canada and went to great lengths to obfuscate the fact that men are the primary victims by splitting men into different categories like "youth" and "indigenous" so that there wasn't ever a stat on how homelessness affected men. Feminists are trying to game the system to make sure men are never shown to be victims and women to be shown as always the most moral, the best leader, etc.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/26 12:14 AM
4

Thank you for writing. If their ethics evaporate the moment a group becomes socially acceptable to dehumanize, how can these people seriously label themselves feminists or progressives? This is the question I've asked as well. How concrete could their commitment to equality (which has disappeared in the face of "equity") have been when they were so ready to discard it at the first opportunity? A leftist perspective helps answer this question: wealth. The kind of "progressives" that first abandon…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/01/26 12:10 AM
1

A women who defies female gender roles, expectations, and norms can still be someone who expresses, celebrates, and makes full authentic use of her femininity. I disagree but I also think that women who claim to have defied female gender roles haven't actually done that. They've rejected "making dinner for their partner" part but will most likely still put on make-up, or dress attractively. Even if they don't do this, they will still receive positive male and female attention because they're rec…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/01/26 11:35 PM
8

Great comment. I think men also feel more deeply than society realizes.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/26 09:56 PM
3

Masculinity is a different thing altogether and, when healthy, quite at odds with that. Could you elaborate?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/26 09:14 PM
28

Women's fear of crime (Wikipedia) Studies consistently find that women around the world tend to have much higher levels of fear of crime than men, despite the fact that in many places, men's actual victimization rates are higher for most offenses It's interesting that it's around the world. I'd love to see the rate of fear compared to the uptake of feminism within the country.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/26 09:12 PM
15

Interesting take. However, I will say that feminist women will say that men shouldn't approach women. How contact is made, and how the species continues to be populated, is left unclear. They certainly aren't saying women should be approaching men. My reading on this is that when they imagine "dangerous" men approaching them, they have an ugly, socially awkward man in their mental image. However, when an attractive, charismatic, over 6" guy comes up to them and starts talking, the situation is s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/26 09:11 PM
1

Yes, I did forget circumcision. Thank you! Shout out to /r/Intactivism. It's clearly the genital mutilation of a child but people will still argue for it because it's what they're used to.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/01/26 08:58 PM
13

In an ideal world, no. We don't live in an ideal world, though. Too many people still believe that might makes right.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/26 11:57 PM
5

Most American wars have been imperialist, yes. Chomsky does a rundown in one of his books if anybody is interested. As mentioned, though, WWII, the Civil War and the Revolutionary War were not imperialist or unjust, imo.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/26 11:56 PM
23

In some ways, the peace movement was #MeToo for men. Everyone was protesting sending the draft, the Vietnam war, and sending young men / boys into literal hell. (For insight into how hellish Vietnam was for these kids, read Dispatches by Michael Herr.) While it wasn't consciously about men's bodily autonomy, the effect was to protect exactly that but because it wasn't explicit, we didn't grow a social consciousness that the draft deprives men of their bodily autonomy. So there's two major ways n…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/01/26 11:54 PM
1

? Conservative Muslim countries tend to treat women like garbage. That's fact so I doubt the mods would have a problem with it. Also, just because a country or society does something doesn't mean all or most of its citizens support it and just because a country uses religion to oppress others doesn't mean that that religion or its followers are inherently bad. This is the kind of freedom of thought (and expression) that critical thinking allows.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/01/26 01:42 AM
1

Endure, provide, absorb risk. Good summary.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 09:02 AM
1

Sorry, did feminists offer empirical proof for toxic masculinity? Then why are scientists accepting it as real? Everybody's just trying to cope.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 08:59 AM
1

"The only unnatural sex act is that which cannot be performed." -- Kinsey. I personally don't think anything two (or more) consenting adults do together that gives them pleasure is disgusting. People are wildly different. It would be disgusting for YOU because you're YOU. Other people aren't you so how does it make THEM disgusting?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 08:57 AM
1

Assumptions of bad intent in men is feminist SOP. I realized this when I listed to an "gender expert" on CBC explain that men read to their children at night because they wanted to avoid doing the dishes. Not joking. It's so dehumanizing being a man.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 08:54 AM
1

Reminds me of Fifty Shades of Grey and how often I'd see women reading it in public. If I read a known porn novel for men on the bus, I'd get kicked off and possibly charged. Male sexuality is disgusting and dangerous. Honestly think that many feminists hate porn because it threatens their sexual power.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 08:52 AM
35

It doesn't matter what the context is. It's hate. These people are openly being bigots and bigots don't have the right to claim "context". Now, I'm not calling them bigots for saying something with which I disagree (the modern definition of "racist" or "sexist") but because they are explicitly being bigots. Negatively generalizing about an entire gender makes you a bigot. There is NO context that justifies that. Their trauma (if it even exists) doesn't give them the right to spread hate.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 08:50 AM
45

Well thought-out. I've saved this for future use. Thanks! Even the wikipedia article for misandry struggles to acknowledge that it exists: Men's rights activists (MRAs) and other masculinist groups have characterized modern laws concerning divorce, domestic violence, conscription, circumcision and treatment of male rape victims as examples of institutional misandry. However, in virtually all societies, misandry lacks institutional and systemic support comparable to misogyny, the hatred of women.…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 08:40 AM
0

I think the majority of feminists aren't the ones shutting down men's spaces or calculatingly using words to silence men (mansplaining). These are purposeful actions and there just aren't that many people, let alone women, willing to put the real-world effort into creating these kinds of consequences for men. I also believe every one of us has a responsibility to think critically and be mindful of what we say. The un-critical many are failing this democratic responsibility and it's especially eg…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 07:52 AM
5

That ship has sailed, and it's a ship called Woke. Feminism intersectionality is the same as "woke". So feminism's great contribution to the world has been to subvert the idea that everybody is equal and should be treated as an individual whatever their gender, race or sexuality. They've reduced free speech. They've reduced artistic freedom. They've re-introduced fear and shame into socio-political discussions (what would have been called "religious discussions" during the Reign of Christianity)…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 07:45 AM
25

I was frank when asked if I attempted suicide by a doctor and I told her that if I'm going to do it, I'll do it. There won't be an attempt. There are very definite ways to kill yourself without a gun (again, Canada). I get mistakes happen but I honestly don't see how someone "attempts" suicide. If I kill myself, it's because the pain inside is too great to bear and if that's the case, I'm not going to fuck around. I won't, though. My suicide would hurt my family and I wouldn't do that to them...…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 07:40 AM
5

Hell yes we do :D
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 02:50 AM
11

It's the Motte-and-bailey fallacy. Feminists proclaim X, where X is a statement injurious to men. When called upon X, they retreat to Y, which is a statement non-injurious (or less-injurious) to men. Feminists use it constantly. Look at the patriarchy. Feminists are supposed to "Smash the patriarchy" and fight against it, and are oppressed by it, but when one asks for feminists to point out the patriarchy in a society that benefits and serves women first, suddenly the patriarchy is more indefini…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 02:49 AM
10

This is obvious to any father who has teenage girls. While my daughters don't tend to listen to modern pop, what they have brought home from female artists almost always includes a Misandrist Song. Whether in the context of one man in a former relationship or just all men period, these pop artists will invariably generalize and demonize men. It's ironic how feminists have made the stereotype of a 'man-hating feminist' completely true for ALL feminists. You cannot be a feminist in 2025 (or 2026) …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 02:45 AM
2

I have to masturbate to something in this thread.....
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 02:37 AM
1

they’re not responsible for emotional labor in a relationship, either romantic or platonic. C'mon son. I hate the term "emotional labour" because it minimizes what it means: caring about other people. Which is something that women do a lot of in relationships. Most guys who don't talk to their friends about their issues still talk to their wives. The idea that every wife out there hates emotional men is a canard.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 02:36 AM
3

Both examples ring true because the immediate supposition that men are evil is an inherent part of any feminist discussion about men. And your examples are exactly why I can't get help, which worsened my depression and threatened my life. If I hadn't been an introspective, thoughtful person since I was a teenager, (i.e, if I hadn't been unknowingly practicing cbt so that I would be able to one day pull MYSELF out of suicidal depression) I'd be dead right now. There's a certain thread in an r/ask…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 02:34 AM
1

Fundamentally, women agree with the socio-economic filtering mechanisms that divide men into a small group of winners and many losers. Are you referring to that study of that website (or app?) that showed that all of these women were cheating with the same few guys? Because I'm not sure that's enough to make the claim you're making.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 02:27 AM
3

The Progressive effort to reform masculinity is designed to sand the edges off the arrogant and hyperconfident, not lift up the shy and anxious. Damn. Thanks, it was staring me in the face. That's why they piss me off so much. I'm shy, anxious, and fucking done with bullies.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 02:25 AM
2

So an adult human. You're describing an adult human working in a professional capacity. All these woke therapists should be de-certified because their mental age is far, far too low to be in a position of such power.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 02:23 AM
4

keep s*cking money from clients… This is all therapists do anyways. While I agree that talking things out is a good idea, I really don't think therapists earn their money and don't agree with Reddit's opinion that everybody should be seeing a therapist for every challenge in their lives. No. Grow some self-sufficiency. If that becomes too difficult, or you can't see your way through, sure, fine, therapy (if you can afford it - the poor sure can't). But having talked to family members and friends…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 02:22 AM
2

Stoicism can unironically serve selfless functions Can you think of some examples? I imagine that thinking about your feelings, desires, and pain make you less likely to automatically value a woman's life over your own but I don't know.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 02:18 AM
5

Especially if the feeling is anger, because then you're dangerous. Anger is on the emotional spectrum, is much healthier than the hate feminists harbour for men, but it is almost criminal for a man to be publicly (or privately) angry anymore.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 02:16 AM
3

Society needed to be forced into accepting women stepping outside of their traditional gender roles, By capitalism, let's not forget. Capitalists doubled the amount of workers they could exploit from 1980 onwwards. Double incomes let them increase their prices with little restraint and enrich themselves at the expense of everyone else. But feminists, liberal or conservative, treat the idea the same was trad cons treat abortion. Which shows just how feminists our governments are because they've f…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 02:09 AM
8

Yes. In my local paper, Male Mental Health day featured a screed blaming men for their mental health problems, both in terms of the "toxic masculinity" that's 'hurting them' intrinsically and because they "won't go" to the therapy and "get help overcoming toxic masculinity". Victim blaming. This is in Canada, where the male suicide rate is 5x that of women's. Oh yeah! FUCK all those suicides, man. If they had just been feminist, they'd still be alive! Let's mock the dead on a day meant to preven…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 02:06 AM
12

Welcome to the sub. You write like a free-thinker. Not just because you questioned feminism: insular spaces always run the risk of becoming an echo chamber. It’s why criticism and complaints need to be accepted not guarded out, you don’t know what useful information may be excluded even by accident If somebody believes men's problems are caused by a fictitious entity known as The Patriarchy, but is committed to helping men online and with boots on the ground, I couldn't care less. I do a lot of …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 01:49 AM
29

They're calculated by a devious few but spread by the un-critical many.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 01:40 AM
75

Tell Reddit that in 2020, Canadian men killed themselves at five times the rate of women and it will only be a matter of minutes before a feminist pipes up to say "But women try it more often...". Yes. Because not dying is super totally comparable to dying.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 01:38 AM
48

tell men why they're wrong and deserve no empathy for upholding a system they created This is why the LEFT-WING part of our sub is an essential component because these kinds of arguments are easily deconstructed by taking a class-based perspective. In terms of a society, men didn't create a system - the rich did. It's easy to prove because everything about our society serves the rich: from our schedules, to our commutes, to the way our cities and towns are organized, to our government, to the ch…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 01:37 AM
39

we’re told the centring of women is how we are supposed to liberate ourselves from the countless societal pressures and oppression we face? What? This makes perfect sense.... ...if you believe that men are defective versions of women. Men's liberation is about "liberating" men from trying to be "men" and accept themselves as defective versions of women. So it is only by listening to (real/female) feminists, doing what they tell men to do, and never questioning orders, are men able to free themse…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/12/25 01:27 AM
16

I hope the ideology burns, and from the ashes, a truly inclusive egalitarian movement can blossom and vigorously work to tackle real class issues. Hear hear. If we want to tackle class issues, woke ideology will have to burn along with feminism, though, because it's almost designed to divide the working class. Solidarity doesn't exist in an environment where white men only get to speak when women and 'POC' are done speaking. (e.g.., NDP policy conventions, Occupy movement, many others.)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates06/12/25 02:11 AM
4

When you're privileged, equality feels like oppression Okay, but what does oppression feel like, then? If this is their comeback, how do they tell if someone is actually being oppressed? They won't. That's the point. To silence people who will object to their faith-based belief system. Also, this is always said by supposed non-privileged people - so how do they know what equality feels like? They don't. Like most woke/feminists arguments, they come apart at the faintest touch of logic and empath…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/25 11:10 PM
15

With that kind of perspective maybe just get a hooker. The perspective you built out of your imagination? You're arguing against yourself because nothing you've said about me is remotely true. You're a bully. Very common amongst the woke left and feminists.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 10:30 AM
12

The right wing does depend on grievance and persecution though? Judging others for something your wing is actively doing - against type - is hypocrisy and there's no reason to abide by it. but the left generally are not looking for enemies, because they want to increase welfare for all groups, not just the in group. Not the Left of the last 10 years, no. Not at all. Modern feminism thrives on hurting men. I'm getting the feeling you're in the wrong sub if you're hating on "liberals" so hard. I'm…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/25 10:28 AM
17

You're being disingenuous and building insulting strawmen. Is opening your mind to different perspective that scary to you? You should try thinking some time. It's fun :)
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 10:24 AM
20

Did you reply to the right person? Or are you denying the "romance ride" that most/many women expect out of dates? It's a guy's job to surprise, delight, and romance the woman in the beginning of a romance. It's why guys usually pay for dates, arrange the reservations, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 10:18 AM
22

A social pattern isn't a conspiracy. Nobody said conspiracy but you.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 10:11 AM
17

The issue is a lot of women can't tolerate the idea of interest from men they aren't already attracted to no matter the context or manner of it Yes, that is a snobbish and dehumanizing way to treat men and something women should address. I agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 10:10 AM
19

"My porn is better than your porn because it's what I like."
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 10:09 AM
27

approach strangers You mean, meet people? Feminists are the New Puritans. You musn't speak to a lady without a formal introduction! objectify her' Over-used word of the decade. Sexual interest is not objectification. They feel entitled to be entertained Sorry, are you talking about women while on dates? Because they do. Women don't go out of their way to entertain and romance the guy - the expectation is that this is the guy's role. And nobody talks about him being "objectified" as an entertainm…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 10:06 AM
4

"internalized misogyny", "bad faith", "you won't change your mind so I won't bother trying", "educate yourself", (and, recently, "you're ai") are all tactics to avoid actually discussing the issue. It's often because they're feminist because of how "being feminist" feels. If I were young and offered the opportunity to be an underdog fighting an oppressive system despite having more social and economic advantages than the other gender, I'd've probably been tempted too. We all crave a hero's journ…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/25 09:10 AM
3

Im tired of people putting me in the same bag with others. Im not "men", Im not "white". I am... well me. That hit hard. You shouldn't be experiencing this. I grew up in an environment where everybody agreed it was bigotry to judge people on the basis of their race or gender, or to generalize about any race or gender. Because, you know. It is wrong. Watching our society turn into one where it's not only not wrong, but even encouraged, to shit on people for the way they were born, but only for on…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/25 09:06 AM
2

Perhaps a minor point, but I'm not sure it's useful to think about disadvantages 'balancing out' because once you understand, say, the male experience and also what you can understand of the the female experience, it's so complex, and heart-breaking, that thinking of it in terms of "who's hurt more" is not only inaccurate but disrespectful to the hundreds of millions of people who have been hurt by our sometimes fucked up gender dynamic. Otherwise, I'm in your camp so I can't speak directly. Ind…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/25 08:53 AM
24

i've noticed some of it is cause plenty of left-leaning people don't actually ascribe agency to women. Yes. The Left assigns hypo-agency to women and hyper-agency to men. Women are never responsible for anything (hypo-agency). If they don't have higher-paying jobs, despite being provided every available academic and employment opportunity, it's because "the patriarchy" (the feminist bogeyman) has warped their poor, defenceless minds into accepting lower-paid work. Meanwhile, men are responsible …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/25 03:14 AM
11

weird argumentation Yes, exactly. It takes a convoluted (and faith-based) argument to explain why hurting men is okay to do because they know it's not okay. After all, men are human beings too and we shouldn't needlessly hurt them. See how easy that was? That's because it's a moral truth, not a moral justification.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/25 03:10 AM
22

the left seems to have no self awareness whatsoever. I recently saw, in a feminist sub, "The right-wing depends on grievance and persecution". It's hard to comprehend how someone on the Left can say that with a straight face when we have let the 'woke' / ctrl-left take over this entire wing of the political spectrum, and grievance and persecution is an absolute pillar of their "movement". It's like liberals don't see that the Right is reacting to what's been said / done in the Left for the last …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/25 03:08 AM
1

Sure, if you start one! Make a page, pick a symbol, and let people know about it. That's how things get done.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/12/25 01:56 AM
1

Well if you tend to interact with people who don't think critically or are afraid to challenge the status quo, you might not realize how curated your experience is.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/25 12:39 PM
7

The Left thinks it's owed votes. They used to have the solid moral high ground for such a long time that I can understand this feeling. Now that the ctrl-left/woke have hijacked the Left, though, it's time to make it clear that they aren't owed anything. The Left can't keep on shitting on white people and men and expect their votes anyways.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/25 09:50 PM
4

https://aroundthecampfire.ca/sitka-project I think you might like this. It's something a guy in BC Canada started. Guys can wear a hat with a picture of a sitka on it and it's a silent signal that they're there to talk with other men who need help. It seems like a much better solution than formal therapy for working class man.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/25 09:49 PM
12

A teacher told my daughter that. I had a talk with the teacher with stats on homelessness, suicide, workplace deaths, harsher sentences for the same crime, etc. I doubt I got through but it never hurts to try - as long as you're calm.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/11/25 09:45 PM
3

Good on you for doing all this research and work! If I bring up that men are 6.6 times more likely to be murdered than women I get victim blaming, talking about most of those murders being gang and crime related. Yeah or it's "It's men murdering men" as if it doesn't matter. It reminds me of racists not caring about "blacks killing blacks" in inner-city crime. Feminism condones and encourages the dehumanization of men. But any time I try and push for a little bit of empathy, I get abuse and trea…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/25 10:24 AM
4

Sad that we lost our original mods and sub creator. If it was really over API, though, I don't get it. Mods were vastly overvaluing their contributions when it was the people who actually write and make the content that deserve the profit, if anything. Mods do that too, but modding an empty sub isn't modding so it all depends on the contributors.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/25 10:21 AM
16

Pretty eye opening to be honest. I think most of us remember a moment where we realized that society wasn't structured the way we were taught and it's far more likely to benefit and protect women than men. Try telling feminists that men commit suicide at more than twice the rate of women, and they'll respond that "women try it more". How does that speak to the dead men? It doesn't, because to feminists men can't be victims. Like when you tell a feminist that men are twice as likely to be murdere…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/25 10:05 AM
27

There's no male privilege; there's just wealth privilege. Men didn't start wars; wealthy people did. Feminism is blind to class.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/25 10:00 AM
7

Great work! The Book of Men's Issues is also a good resource to bookmark.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/25 09:59 AM
4

You need to put two spaces to separate a line. You did great work but it would help if you put in more spacing.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/25 09:58 AM
1

It's been like that for as long as I've seen it but I only saw it after it was pointed out in this sub.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/11/25 12:02 AM
13

"Women Write Wiki" got to Earl's page and ripped it apart. It used to read like he probably deserved his suicide. I'm glad to see it restored. Now take a look at the wiki page for "misandry" - it can't even fully admit that it exists. Erin Margaret Pizzey is a British men's rights activist and novelist. She is recognized for founding the world's first and largest domestic violence shelter, Refuge. Pizzey says that she has been the subject of death threats and boycotts because her experience ... …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/25 12:35 AM
4

Their definition of IPV also includes verbal and psychological abuse, which I would guess more men suffer from. Legal/administrative IPV, such as false accusations, misuse of restraining orders, and reputation damage, disproportionately affects men. (26,28) Never considered this but I'm completely unsurprised that men are disproportionately affected by this. Don Dutton out of UBC has done some good work on this subject as well. He's been saying for decades that most IPV is bi-directional.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/11/25 12:26 AM
25

All of Menslib......
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/25 07:10 PM
23

Hey, it was CBC that finally started me questioning feminist biases! I was listening to a female "expert" psychologist on housework (trying to perpetuate the myth that women work more) and she says that after dinner, many men will read to their children as a way to avoid cleaning up after supper. Literal demonization of men. It couldn't be that men work longer hours, by far, and so want to spend as much time as possible with their kids before they have to sleep. Nooooo. It was because guys hate …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/10/25 07:10 PM
20

The men is bad enough but what about the all the BOYS being taught that their gender is evil, disgusting, perverted, violent and hateful? There's irreparable psychological damage being done to children and it's often condoned or encouraged by schools.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/25 11:03 PM
22

It's good to consider the traditional masculine roles that the MensLib types get to play out when they call other men "weak" or "fragile". They're the big tough men who can take women's aggression and insults without showing pain and they're laughing at the weak, fragile, sexually-diminished men (male advocates who are objecting to sexist treatment). It's feminists using traditional masculine values to keep other men in line.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/25 11:01 PM
16

the best ways you can dismantle a movement of insecure men is by making fun of them. Welp, as an active male advocate for 5+ years, I'd say that feminists considers all of us to be insecure, judging by the way they treat us. Laughter. Derision. Contempt. Commentator talking deriding men's height You have to be smarter than this No. You have to be more compassionate than this. Feminists have zero compassion for men as a gender.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/10/25 10:59 PM
3

The common denominator is far from a perfect theory. I tend to be friends with people who society have rejected despite them being warm, honest, good-hearted people. They are the "common denominator" but it's clearly societal attitudes and biases that's the problem, not them.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 09:37 PM
2

Yes. Men gave women equal rights. And all the bad things men do are attributed to men but never the good things that men have done. It's just neutral. War is gendered violence.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 09:03 AM
8

but the men complaining aren’t doing so from experience, You have no basis making this claim because there's no way you can know this.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 09:00 AM
6

Why do blue pills always assign hyper-agency to men? It must be his fault because it couldn't possibly be that these women were shallow.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 08:59 AM
2

Dads work more hours than moms when you factor in time on the job, child care and homecare.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/25 08:57 AM
5

theater "spiritual" ayahuasca drinking freaks wut Every time I see someone insisting "a woman whose into you will make it obvious" I immediately assume they're a woman. I'll recognize it as an assumption and treat it accordingly, but I've only seen women say this or "guys don't know how to read signals". You see, it's a guy's fault if he doesn't get the signals. Never a woman's fault. Hypo-agency, man. It's a helluva drug. Footnote Traditionally, our society assigns hyper-agency to men and hypo-…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/25 09:41 PM
–

It's a fabrication in the sense that you were writing it as if it's a universal rule of women. Also I'm a guy but not a big (body-wise) guy so maybe my mouth is bigger but I doubt it.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 01:43 AM
–

oral is almost out of the question I love blowing big dicks so this one's a fabrication of yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 12:57 AM
–

There's another hypocrisy at play here too. What about all the feminists who claimed proof that we live in a patriarchy because there was female nudity in movies? Now every Marvel movie shows a shirtless guy so women can swoon over his pecs and abs...a figure that requires dehydration before filming (so the actors have to harm themselves to look that good). It all goes to show that feminists don't actually care about men, just about blaming men. As for size, size doesn't matter as much when it's…
/r/PurplePillDebate09/10/25 12:55 AM
–

You are right. Misandry exists online, in traditional media and is in the mouths of celebrities and politicians. Absolutely true. I've been noticing this since the mid-90s but it's grown to epidemic proportions thirty years later. However, FIGHT the urge to see it behind every woman. [Women with certain haircuts, sure. There's probably a misandrist hiding under whatever the current haircut is for proclaiming "I AM A PROUD FEMINIST BITCH". (I'm sure there is one.)] But don't apply to every woman …
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 09:16 PM
–

You should consider that the Purple Pills that are replying maybe DO see misandry every day online but they've either internalized the misandry (common) or brush it aside, each time treating it as a 'one-off'.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/09/25 09:03 PM
1

The lack of feminism doesn't mean the lack of women's rights. There are many philosophies that hold every person's individual rights as its central core. To steal a phrase from the atheists: You don't need feminism to be good. :)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/25 05:28 AM
1

I was being 100% genuine.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/08/25 05:05 AM
-1

And I have every right to DEMAND your removal as a mod since you are CLEARLY NOT LEFT-WING. Fuck off back to r/mensrights.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/08/25 06:00 PM
1

A tradcon podcast is not a primary source. A primary source would be a recording, video or audio, of him saying it. I don't want to listen to some wife-beating dickhead (i.e., tradcon) just in case there's a recording of this prof actually saying these things in there.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/08/25 02:41 AM
5

Show me how my comparison wasn't an "honest" one. I wasn't writing to refute your cherry-picked point. I was making the point that most left-wing male advocates aren't going to support or legitimize and you shouldn't be attacking their "dedication to the cause" because of it. It's morally and ideologically consistent with the name of the sub. Seriously. Quit being a mod in this sub if you're not left-wing. Go ahead and name another institution with the same ability and willingness as the White H…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/08/25 02:39 AM
1

Writing to Trump or legitimizing his presidency corporate occupation of the White House is not left-wing. STOP BEING A MOD IF YOU'RE NOT LEFT-WING.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/08/25 02:36 AM
3

What do you see with your own eyes? Rape? Did you report it? You said I'm definitely not a rapist or sexually frustrated woman hater ...there's alot those men running around No, there's not a lot of rapists and "sexually frustrated woman haters" running around.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 02:31 AM
5

Feminists don't know what it's like being a man and yet see fit to describe what is and is not "healthy masculinity". ...Because feminism hurts men. It's foundationally anti-male.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 02:28 AM
15

I told someone recently that I didn't believe her bullshit story about "trying to help incels and all they did was threaten to rape me" but it was hard to do. We're programmed to want to believe women and help them (even just emotionally) if they tell us a sad story. But, in my youth, I told stories like that. Rarely, but still. Stories where I thought of doing something, then thought about what kind of reaction would happen, and then I'd test it out with friends (who were male, and not nearly a…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 12:19 AM
7

Anyone who criticizes feminism is called a 'woman-hater' by feminists when all that is being done is criticizing their ideology. I mean, don't make feminism your whole identity and maybe it won't feel like such a personal attack.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 12:12 AM
0

alot those men running around No, no there isn't. Self-reporting statistics are fantasies, not reality.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/25 12:11 AM
-5

"If you're not with us, you're for the terrorists." Sure thing dubya. Are you SURE you're left-wing?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/25 11:54 PM
3

I'm not going to arm Islamic revolutionaries because I think they'll get rid of the Communists. Read some history, how about. Arming your enemies to attack your other enemies never works out well. Not to mention it lacks ideological and moral integrity.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/25 11:52 PM
2

I'll write to Harvard but as a left-wing male advocate, I will NOT write to the White House, which is currently attacking illegal immigrants in America and putting them into a prison in a foreign country without any of their inalienable rights recognized, not to mention my disgust and loathing for the monster posing as a man in the Oval Office, the first Capitalist President, no, no fucking way. But yes, this shows how normalized bigotry against men can be in our society, particularly in academi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates20/08/25 11:51 PM
4

She would be forced to if after participating in the act of potential procreation the man renages on the risk that was taken by demanding a procedure to remove the pregnancy or no financial contribution. If she can’t afford to cover his obligations, that’s a type of force. "Reneges"? Is the woman reneging when she has an abortion? And he's not "demanding" anything. She can still have the baby. It's her choice. She just needs to be able to afford it, on her own. I'd like you to consider that you …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/25 02:52 AM
8

Let me specify. It IS because the woman wants the baby because she has a choice - she can abort the baby. If she aborts, the guy doesn't owe anything. If she WANTS the baby, however, then he is supposed to pay, which removes his choice. "Pro-choice" is only for her choice, not his. And don't say they both decided to have sex again. We're past that point. The fetus is present. Only the mother has choice because the father (1) can't prevent her from having an abortion and (2) can't force her to ha…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/25 01:04 AM
6

No, it is just because the woman wants it. Because if she didn't want it, the guy wouldn't be made to pay for the baby since there'd be no baby. It is ENTIRELY her choice whether or not another person has to pay for 18 years of child care. Which is definitionally anti-choice, because it removes the man's right to choose. Heck, it doesn't even recognize that he should have a right to choose.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/25 12:39 AM
1

Well, I hope you can eventually heal from whatever hurt you. What are "violent people"? People who are usually violent or people who have the capacity for violence? Either way, I'm going to disagree that anyone is "damaged goods", at least in the sense that they're irretrievably damaged beyond repair. Each of us are either damaged in some way, or have led incredibly sheltered lives.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 11:47 PM
1

I'm so so sorry this has been your experience. It must be painful. Son, I've been trolling before you were even a gleam in your father's eye. However I would argue that we people who look closely at our own biases are still influenced by them. Of course you would. It's part of your faith. If this is not true (i.e., "unconscious bias"), then your kind couldn't foist systemic racism and sexism upon the government ("positive discrimination"). Most people have an in group bias. No, they don't. Men p…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 11:43 PM
8

The solid argument is that it is unethical (i.e., wrong) to force a man to pay for something for 18 years just because the woman wants it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/25 10:49 PM
5

I see the logic of that but that is also unfair because the woman is left with the only options to be forced into an abortion happening to her against her wishes of to be left with the consequences from both parties participating in sex. She's not forced to have an abortion. Abortion is pro-choice, remember? It's a choice. If the father doesn't want to pay for a baby SHE wants, she can look into loans or if her family will help. But yes, if she can't afford the child, she should have an abortion…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/25 10:47 PM
5

If you really wanted this: then you'd set up a contract with the woman where you take sole ownership of the baby, pay for all doctors visits beforehand, and pay for the woman 9 months to carry the baby to term. Why should a man pay for a woman's choice? Men in our society are highly more likely to not fight for custody. Majority of custody fights are settled by the man refusing to be the parent. Men in our society are constantly told that women are better parents and, contrary to feminist belief…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/25 08:08 PM
5

Is there a better alternative? Not really. Yes. When a woman finds out she's pregnant, she has a duty to inform the father within x days. The father then has y days to decide whether or not he wants to be legally and financially responsible for the baby. He lets the mother know of his decision. Then the mother can decide whether to abort or have the child. What's the issue?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/25 08:05 PM
12

but what can we do? It's pretty simple, actually. We just have the will to make it happen. When a woman finds out she's pregnant, she has a duty to inform the father within x days. The father then has y days to decide whether or not he wants to be legally and financially responsible for the baby. He lets the mother know of his decision. Then the mother can decide whether to abort or have the child. Everybody has choice and the child doesn't become a ward of the state from birth. Easy-peasy.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/25 08:04 PM
8

It's anti-choice, definitely. It's more anti-choice as forced pregnancy, actually, because it allows an individual to choose an 18-year financial commitment on behalf of someone else. A woman can give birth and then put the kid up for adoption. A father has no such choice. In no sane legal landscape can one person force a choice upon someone else, especially one with such serious consequences. I can't think of anything else analogous in law or society. Typically, it comes down to money. The stat…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/25 07:59 PM
3

Your reply was. This seems true of all humans not just feminists or women. We do like our biases and preconceptions. False. I've been examining my biases and preconceptions since I was a teenager and I haven't stopped since. I've done the work and yet am consistently grouped with the same kind of men who were my tormentors as a youth because we share a gender. We do like our biases and preconceptions. Especially feminists. Women have an unacknowledged in-group bias and it shows in the consistent…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 07:11 PM
1

Where? I see an analogy. Oh, and that Christian missionaries made unsubstantiated claims. Do you really want to dispute that religion is full of unsubstantiated claims?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 07:03 PM
1

You didn't answer the question. (It's not surprising. Feminists don't challenge their own beliefs. That's how the movement became overrun with bigots.) Are violent women damaged goods as well?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 06:56 PM
1

Women tend to be hypergamists and marry men richer than themselves. That's why most women do not HAVE to provide the primary income for the family and are FREE to pursue their interests (while they complain about a false "pay gap"). I have sympathy pity for “nice guys” simply because of the amount of anger they live with. FTFY. "Sympathizing" with a group of people you've defined within a demographic is bigotry. You're pushing your own assumptions onto other people and then reacting to yourself.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 06:55 PM
1

Maybe women should just take on asking guys out. But they won't because then they won't get the ego boost of guys pursuing them. Which IS an ego boost when it's appreciated. Like wearing tight clothes to be attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 06:02 PM
2

It isn't magic, but you should know people's unspoken thoughts. I think you're being disingenuous.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 06:00 PM
3

Weak sauce. I don't have a "link" to my lived experiences, no.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 06:00 PM
18

One of the purposes of modern feminism is to ensure that women never have to reconsider their gender assumptions.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 11:47 PM
5

So men just have to magically know the right venues that each women finds "appropriate", say exactly the right words, and listen to people's unspoken thoughts, they'll be just fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 11:46 PM
1

Um, yeah it absolutely IS discriminatory when a man is not being picked because he's short. That's height discrimination and not at all like "not being picked for a job". Unless, you know, it's a government job and you're a white guy, in case it probably IS discrimination, just a legally and socially unrecognized form. Don't worry; we'll get there. :)
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 11:44 PM
14

Correct. Most women who talk about this in general are assuming the guy approaching them is NOT someone they want to approach them. So when the reverse happens, and a man they find attractive approaches them, the context is so different to what they imagined that they probably don't even realize they're being hypocritical. This is why self-reporting statistics are bullshit. People will answer a survey question as if it's a chance to re-write reality. So when 90% (or whatever) of UK women under 2…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/08/25 11:42 PM
1

Unsubstantiated claims, the hallmark of the woke. Also, I'm a heretic misogynist because I don't accept God feminism into my life? It just keeps on giving! The missionaries also excelled at unsubstantiated claims.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 01:23 AM
1

Don't kid yourself - that 'violent' doesn't really have to be there, does it? And what about violent women? Are they damaged as well? What about the verbally and emotionally abusive women, the ones who are in their element? Broken? And you didn't take up the opportunity to realize that you're judging people with no way of knowing what their lived experience actually is like. This reminds me feminists' judgement of male sexuality. "It's wrong because it's not like women."
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 01:18 AM
16

People on average date and marry within their own status. False. Women consistently marry above their status. because most women have some sort of self esteem issues or anxious attachment. Most of dateable age people came from boomer/gen x dads after all. Ageism is a form of bigotry. I'm sure it's acceptable in your friend group but I'm not in your friend group so I'm telling you that this kind of thinking makes you a bigot. Also, some women have self-esteem or anxious attachment issues because …
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 10:09 PM
2

Do you have a screenshot of an admin admitting hate against women on Reddit is okay? No. No you do not. Misandry does not violate Reddit's rules. Reddit's original content policy only restricted hated against minority groups. They "changed it" a few days later but they didn't really change it at all. Hate against white people or men is acceptable to the admin of Reddit. Just go into most twox posts that talks about men. Chock full o' hate. Or ask why FemaleDatingStrategy is still allowed to exis…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 05:36 AM
2

Did the documentary mention FGM? I wouldn't agree that would be deflection because circumcision isn't yet seen as male mutilation and so there's very little opportunity to create a discussion about it. Plus, our society talks about women, and helping women, exactly 9.27x as much as it does men, so there's less opportunity to discuss men's issues, especially since feminists rarely allow men to be seen as victims.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 01:45 AM
1

I didn't say it was analogous. I was just making a joke out of the terrible tragedy that is women asking their victims to pay child support. Male feminists are always so ANGRY. Must be pent up about sumthin.......... .................
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 01:42 AM
1

Thanks for making the time it took worthwhile!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 01:37 AM
0

My point is to inform you about all the women who sued the children they raped for child support. Alpha and Omega. You thought your "gotcha" I didn't have a gotcha. men fantasizing about being raped by teachers whenever a story like that comes out. Well if they were men, it wouldn't be rape, would it?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 01:16 AM
0

State ex rel. Hermesmann v. Seyer San Luis Obispo County v. Nathaniel J Accord Schierenbeck v. Minor, 367 P.2d 333 (Colo. 1961); Department of Revenue ex rel. Bennett v. Miller, 688 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997); In re Paternity of J.S., 193 Ill. App. 3d 563, 550 N.E.2d 257 (1990); Rush v. Hatfield, 929 S.W.2d 200 (Ky. Ct. App. 1996); Commonwealth v. A Juvenile, 387 Mass. 678, 442 N.E.2d 1155 (1982); Jevning v. Chicos, 499 N.W.2d 515 (Minn. 1993); Mercer County v. Alf M., 155 Misc. 2d 703, 589…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 12:45 AM
3

Funny how feminism built its recent power on these kinds of generalizations but when men talk about what they've experienced, they're innundated with "links?" as if people screenshot everything in their online lives, screenshots that would just be qualified or argued with anyways. Women use oppression as a shield from accountability by saying "You can't be sexist against men" when they're being a bigot.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 12:42 AM
4

Look, another feminist hating on men. Sorry, this isn't even note-worthy since it's just the everyday backdrop of Reddit. Reddit - where hate against men is A-OK!
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 12:40 AM
0

As someone who doesn't have balls, however, you have no idea what it is like to live with testosterone. I have the feeling that won't stop the judgement, though :)
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 12:39 AM
0

Good question. Feminists do the same thing to white people.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 12:38 AM
1

This is pathetic.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 12:37 AM
1

It would come off badly if I hopped into every discussion of boys in elementary school to complain about how some girls struggle within the current classroom structure, because it would be derailing. Yes, feminists do come off badly. Like when I talk about men's suicide rate and I'm flooded with responses of "Women attempt suicide more often!".
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 12:36 AM
1

Many men’s issues do get raised as a deflection in conversations about women’s issues, so the observation of that is factual. Usually the subject has been defined as a "women's issue", even though it affects men as well, so bringing up how it affects men as well isn't a "deflection".
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 12:34 AM
0

Yes yes, women are the ones talking about "I wish that was me" every time a teacher rapes a student No, they're too busy asking their rape victims for child support.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 12:33 AM
0

No, they're not.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 12:31 AM
1

Do you have any evidence that's men's groups DO NOT do these things? You are making a strong claim here so the burden of proof is on you. Feminism really wants to lay claim for men freeing themselves for gender norms, doesn't it. Also, therapy serves women better than it serves men.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 12:31 AM
2

The narrative is that women's health is ignored because doctors have studied men, not women, when designing tests and prescription pills.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/25 07:49 PM
6

Trudeau, dedicated to a "feminist Canada", committed 99% of Canada's foreign aid to just women. Sorry boy soldiers. You probably started the war anyways.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/25 07:48 PM
2

Five's an arbitrary number, and my 'ways' are all interconnected but I will list you some ways in which feminism hurts men. No problem. First, though: Feminists were the first to say that men didn't have to conform to narrow bands to be men. Unprovable claims aren't a great way to start a discussion. There's no way to prove that feminists were the first people to say men aren't limited to "narrow bands" to be men. Secondly, feminists are claiming to have saved men (because feminism clearly has a…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 02:16 AM
1

It makes sense, really, but it's so uncomfortable people didn't want to recognize and we got saddled with "Stranger Danger", which only furthered the atomization of our society. Step-parents are people who aren't blood-related ("strangers") but have access to the children.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 10:02 PM
1

There is isnt there? No, there isn't. Feminists and women are never asked to consider their sexism, their gender assumptions and their female privilege. Women just tend to have had it worse historically. Being at home with the kids, relatively safe, socializing with other mothers every day, doing less laborious work than the man, being fed and protected first, never having to put yourself between a blade and a loved one until the man has already done so and died for it...... is worse? I know you…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 02:53 AM
–

Not when you consider child support and that a man generally has to maintain the ex-wife's (and the kids) standard of living - even if she couldn't have afforded that standard of living on her own income. Gets to have the kids, gets paid for it, gets paid extra because her husband contributed more to their household than she did. Divorce laws are definitely gynocentric.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 02:41 AM
3

Feminism hurts men but, like any good abuser, don't wanna hear 'bout it! Space. Taken.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 02:39 AM
5

I know. That's why I'm telling you to tell it feminists; they'll only listen to other feminists women. all men are evil because they’re men No, that's a fundamental conclusion within feminism. When you look at inner-city crime, you don't conclude that criminal behaviour is in da genes - you look at the socio-economic factors and present and historical racism. When you look at the alcoholism rate amongst the indigenous, you don't say "alcohol is their weakness" - you look at intergenerational tra…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/25 02:36 AM
–

Glad to hear :)
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:54 PM
4

The role of a wife under patriarchy is essentially that of an employee, where a woman provides a very specific set of services (that can be performed by literally any female person interchangeably: cook, clean, sex, birth, raise the kids, wipe your husband's ass, chew his food for him and spit it back in his mouth, etc etc) and in exchange the man compensates her by funding their lifestyle. It's a common feminist tactic to take a privilege and dress it in the clothes of oppression. So a woman wa…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:53 PM
3

They don't "misunderstand"; they disagree. It's hard to disagree with people who have a religious conviction in their gender perspectives.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:46 PM
1

Some real ageism in this post.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:45 PM
1

Women don't have to face problems that men have to face. Why isn't there a process for you to understand that, and the privilege that women receive?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:43 PM
2

It gives you the outlet to have emotions other than anger, So men have to be feminists to be full human beings? Because as full human beings, we have emotions other than anger.... And he's not pretending; you're using the No True Scotsman fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:43 PM
6

Men are constantly blamed for not going to therapy (and considering the suicide rate, it's outright victim-blaming) but nobody ever seems to question if therapy is good for men. The approach, the process and everything about therapy should be reconsidered if they really want to help men, but especially the bias of therapists. Do they really think men don't know about the misandrist bias in psychology? I read about a new idea for men's mental health recently. It's called the Sitka Project and the…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:41 PM
4

They are if you're assertively anti-misandrist. Feminists think everything they believe has already been decided and anybody arguing a point they've already decided is "on the losing side of history". I've spoken with many, many feminists and they don't want to hear how feminism hurts men. It's always the "No True Scotsmen" fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:35 PM
2

No, it's taking up the space they need so they don't squish their balls. Women, who famous don't have balls, are the ones who determined it was no longer men's space.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:33 PM
4

Tell that to the feminists because it's how they speak. Women don't want to hear it, though. Believe the victim, remember?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:32 PM
1

Because society treats women better than men, on average. Women are wonderful. But also because there's been a social coup d'etat in the last decade or so and if you challenge anything "woke" or in the realm of the 'identity-obsessed Left', you risk social alienation that can quickly spread to your romantic and professional life as well. Let's not pretend that "equity" was something we all voted on. It was pushed on our society during a massive upswelling of white guilt (George Floyd) and now in…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:31 PM
–

just pretended she was some fringe lunatic and didn't have one of the best selling most influential books of the last several decades LOL. I mean, I guess the Bible was influential as well. It doesn't mean it's good or healthy.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:28 PM
3

Feminists are so far out to lunch they don't see anything wrong with proscribing how men should act and behave. Imagine one race doing that to another. It's too bad r/menkempf was shut down because it's sadlarious that the people who speak about men in such ways think they are at all capable of deciding what men should be. Feminism hurts men and doesn't care that it does so of course their concept of "healthy" masculinity doesn't respect men's personhood or rights.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:20 PM
–

We haven't prioritized bullying as a society yet. Probably because it more often happens to boys. Yes, girls get cyberbullied and verbally bullied too but boys get beaten and cyberbullied more often. That's really shitty about that dude at your school. He has every right to be an individual without being mocked by people too scared of what others think to express themselves as individuals.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 11:13 PM
–

I was wondering if defamation charges could be brought. It's tough to do in the States but easier elsewhere in the world.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 10:51 PM
–

Women are going to gossip whether there is an app or not Yes, gossip is one of the symptoms of toxic femininity. It's just bullying, dressed up to look like 'socializing'.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 10:48 PM
–

Hypergamy is the fact that women are more likely to date and marry men with a higher income than them. I'm not sure how this app proves this. Incidentally, hypergamy is already proven and is used to create sympathy for divorced women. Now the statistic is that a divorced women's income "drops by as much as 30%" while men's income see little to no decrease. All this = "poor women" when really what it's showing is that married women are financially supported by men and suffer a drop in income when…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/25 10:45 PM
1

Those who make snap judgements self-select themselves out of my dating pool, leaving behind the rest of us with a bit of character. It's a good system.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 01:08 AM
2

If you force someone to like you By what process are men forcing women to like them?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 01:02 AM
3

Gossip =|= drama Yes it is. It's what creates the narrative. and no, it's a warning given by a friend that 'that guy' will stab you in the back if given the opportunity. A guy won't say more because he's NOT causing drama. Drama is caused by spinning a narrative. He gives just enough to help a new guy out because yeah, 'that' guy', WILL stab you in the back. Or walk away from a job. Or is unsafe.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 07:09 AM
3

False, in my experience. I have worked in a male-dominated workplace and a female-dominated workplace and women gossip way, way, way more than men. At the mill, the most I'd ever hear about others might be "Watch yourself around that guy" and a refusal to say anything further. The only "gossip" I received was a warning that another worker was smoking pot at work (which made him dangerous in a job where somebody died every 7 years). At the office job, I'd finish a conference call with four of my …
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 11:08 PM
1

Isn't it on women to stop overvaluing such a...ephemeral trait? Confidence means social confidence and the women that are attracted to it are also the women who want/expect to be taken on a romantic/sexual escapade, all provided by the man who will always know the right things to say and the right things to do. So it's not really "self-confidence" but confidence in his ability to please the woman (sexually or romantically).
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 11:04 PM
9

That is a mindset that comes from having to chase women, though, and constantly having to face rejection. It's hard for women to empathize because they're rarely if ever in the same life-situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 10:54 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter