TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Grimmov Archive

View 1 posts and 127 comments by Grimmov on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

Red Pill TheoryGrimmov/r/TheRedPill16/01/14 11:16 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

If you attend/have attended a proper university you will be taught that any claim which is not backed by at least one peer-reviewed paper, is merely an assumption i.e. horseshit." Going by this statement, 98% of the viewpoints that TRP is founded on would be considered horseshit. Evo psych? Biologically-driven mental differences between men and women? No matter how much evidence exists to support something, science can and will be fabricated that claims the precise opposite. The scientific proce…
/r/TheRedPill20/04/16 02:47 AM
2

This corruption in feminism has been going on for well over 20 years now, but the corruption seems to be doubling every few years lately.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 08:02 PM
1

I do, however, think that both boys and girls need to be taught that they have a right to choose what happens to their body No, boys don't have any right to choose what happens to their body. For most men in the US, the first thing that happens to them in life is being strapped down to a table and having half of their penile skin sliced off for no reason. Feminists generally consider this to be a trivially minor issue. Stop trying to reconcile a vile, corrupted movement with your personal views …
/r/MensRights02/01/16 07:39 PM
1

ay_ch, what you need to understand is that feminism is a societal-scale meta-shit-test designed to screen out all of the weaker men who will actually listen to their lies and bullshit. It's similar to an HR department requiring a degree for a job simple enough that a monkey could handle it. They simply have too many applicants and telling all men to fuck off is a good way to make sure that most of the betas stay away. Alternatively, older feminists who get no action can make sure that the younge…
/r/MensRights02/01/16 07:32 PM
-11

No. It isn't. At all.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 07:22 PM
1

That doesn't make any sense. Why would solving completely unrelated types of problems be mutually exclusive or required to occur in a "one-at-a-time" kind of order? There's plenty of evidence that male genital mutilation directly leads to a lot of societal ills such as depression and violence; not to mention, living in a completely barbaric society that doesn't respect individual rights such as genital and bodily integrity is not conducive to any other form of civilized behavior. This reeks of a…
/r/MensRights28/12/15 01:36 AM
1

If you're missing effectively half of your penis, then yes, reduced pleasure.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 01:34 AM
8

If you understood the mechanics of the intact penis and what circumcision actually entails you'd understand what the big deal is. Most circumcised males have absolutely no idea how an intact penis functions or how much skin was actually removed. Circumcision removes approximately half of the erogenous tissue from the penis and turns it from an organ with a mechanical function (gliding action) into a dumb stick, which completely alters the type of sensation it receives.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 06:17 AM
40

Why do these kinds of lists usually omit the most egregious rights violation currently happening in the US, male genital mutilation?
/r/MensRights26/12/15 02:26 AM
5

I'm going to start with a very basic premise. You've been taken in by a fallacy that lies at the foundation of progressivist ethics, which is the idea that all individuals must be held to the same standards and treated identically, even when those individuals possess fundamental differences which make such a notion impossible to carry out in practice. In this school of thought, the value of an ethical viewpoint is determined by how "equally" everyone is treated. Your very complaint is that men a…
/r/TheRedPill21/11/15 08:49 PM
3

There is also not a lot of rape in real life (in civilized nations). That is a made-up feminist narrative used to demonize men and win political favor. Once you start talking about ACTUAL rape and not made up bullshit, prison rape accounts for a very significant portion of all rape and is one of the primary reasons why more men are raped than women each year.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/15 07:04 AM
9

OP, it's simple. You're living in a very tiny bubble. Your experiences are not representative of the reality that 99% of others face on a daily basis. Your life is the exception to the rule... so far. Count yourself as lucky and don't take it for granted.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/15 07:52 PM
1

I don't know about you but I've sure as hell never lived the life of a woman, so I have no clue how difficult their lives are. I guess you haven't been paying attention to literally anything you read in this sub, then.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/15 04:08 AM
4

You're missing the implications. First of all, this study only covers a specific age range. If the teen girls in the study are having sex with older men rather than other teens, you would see them reporting higher numbers. Second, this study isn't counting actual instances of sex, it's counting the numbers of non-virgins. The imbalanced numbers would seem to suggest that a smaller number of alpha males are the ones getting all the action.
/r/TheRedPill24/07/15 04:00 AM
1

You improve not just your bulk, but your cardiovascular health. Nonsense, lifting causes huge improvements in cardiovascular health. You learn to adapt quickly and think on your feet. This is not generalizable to activities outside of fighting/sparring any more than learning to think quickly in a video game will teach you to think quickly in general. You won't be bulky, but you will still be toned and strong. Bullshit in multiple ways. You need to lift weights for years to become bulky. If you f…
/r/TheRedPill23/07/15 08:07 PM
3

People who can do that are well-qualified to be porn stars. They aren't chosen for their looks or cock size after all, they are chosen for their ability to get and keep erections at the drop of a hat. They often abuse Viagra and more dangerous drugs like meth in order to keep this ability. Your perspective is pretty skewed.
/r/TheRedPill12/07/15 01:33 PM
72

Totally normal to not "get it up" when a woman shows up and expects to fuck on the drop of a hat, offers no foreplay, and when there are already pre-existing issues leading to resentment. His only mistake was not telling her to get lost before bothering to strip.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/15 09:42 AM
7

Every once in a while these posts come in from ex-gamers who are brandishing their insecurities to lash out at others who enjoy their former hobby. Formatting your life and hobbies around trying to get bitches is about the most beta thing you can do. I see this post as rather pathetic.
/r/TheRedPill25/06/15 01:07 AM
16

If she says something like that, just reply... "I've got advice for you. Don't invite a grown man out to the movies unless it's a grown up date. You're wasting everyone's time." She's the one comitting a social faux pas, so treat it that way and don't apologize. Just leave.
/r/TheRedPill20/06/15 01:08 PM
5

The correct way to bring an Asperger girl into your frame is to indoctrinate them into your philosophical worldview. The primary factor is intelligence and the ability to project your intellectual self-assuredness. Typical alpha stuff will barely phase them.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/15 01:12 AM
5

If by "plenty" you mean a statistically small percentage, then sure.
/r/TheRedPill08/02/15 03:41 PM
16

Downloaded a PDF on how to identify financial abuse. This particular quote (advising women who are leaving their partner) is very interesting... Also, consider taking at least half of the money in your joint checking and saving accounts immediately upon leaving. However, remember that batterers frequently increase in their efforts at power and control if the partner is leaving. Many victims of domestic violence who have had to flee their home report being surprised to discover their partner imme…
/r/TheRedPill23/12/14 01:17 PM
4

Science has become a political institution. Consensus can and has been manufactured.
/r/TheRedPill28/11/14 09:55 PM
208

Did she really have to spend about 4 paragraphs insulting "nerds"? That nearly seemed like the main topic of her essay. She never stopped to consider that perhaps the problem lies with her.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/14 07:06 AM
1

Right, I wasn't implying that I agreed with the sidebar. The knowledge here at TRP is golden but there are few issues in terms of the philosophy. There are many different factions here interpreting TRP any way they like, from Christian fundamentalists to Objectivists to anti-intellectuals. Only a small percentage will care about such distinctions.
/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 01:16 AM
2

You aren't the only one to raise this particular point. I've made posts in the past making a similar point. TRP is both a knowledge base and a (partial) philosophy. Insofar as it is knowledge, it is amoral, and insofar as it is a philosophy that informs individual choices and actions, it is moral. In other words, the interpretation of knowledge itself is a moral action, as it directly impacts choices in life, which are the sole measuring post of any useful philosophy. Since TRP seeks to both acc…
/r/TheRedPill26/10/14 10:00 AM
2

Women see a starker (an many times more accurate) reality Not sure why anything would ever give you this idea.
/r/TheRedPill21/10/14 08:36 PM
2

How do you explain the existence of thousands of other patterns which exist in nature and society that fall almost exclusively along gender lines? Or do your deny such basic aspects of reality as well?
/r/TheRedPill19/10/14 06:52 PM
0

I don't think you belong here.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/14 05:24 PM
4

Asking this question is not alpha. Being preoccupied with what other people think you should do is not alpha. If your goal in life is to fill a cookie-cutter mold then in fact it's rather pathetic. Do what you enjoy. Anyone who doesn't appreciate it can fuck off. There are plenty of women who are only interested in gamers, anyway.
/r/TheRedPill23/06/14 04:11 AM
1

Your ass backwards views don't have anything to do with TRP.
/r/TheRedPill17/06/14 10:35 AM
35

The only women who engage in domestic violence against men are the ones who have never felt the full force of a man's retaliatory punch. After that education they wouldn't dare.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/14 12:47 AM
2

Suckers are essentially the personification of the beta-blue-pill strategy in life. What do you hope to gain from being on TRP forums if your fundamental views on human interaction prevent you from making use of the philosophy?
/r/TheRedPill07/06/14 10:00 PM
7

In a proper society, women wouldn't be such a horrible influence on men. You seem to lack a generalized context for understanding this article. I suggest you read all the sidebar info. As far as circumcision goes, you seem to know little about that topic either; in anything, it's far worse than the article presents, but that isn't the main topic.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/14 09:32 AM
7

The article states that a lack of a father figure is a bad thing. TRP philosophy states that the lack of a father figure is a bad thing. "Traditional gender roles," which is a concept only tangentially related to TRP, also states that the lack of a father figure is a bad thing. I'm not sure where you got the idea that TRP would support the idea of children lacking a father figure.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/14 08:01 AM
10

Sounds like you didn't even read the article.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/14 07:35 AM
5

If something makes that little sense, chances are you don't understand it.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/14 07:00 AM
1

I don't know that most women understand what it means when they use it, but it's supposed to be a counterpoint to the idea that only "some" men rape/harass women. Because even if only 1% of men behave that way, all women have to deal with the (massively exaggerated) risk of it happening to them. In the solipsistic minds of women means that all men are by extension guilty of endangering women, and the only way to remove the potential threat is to remove all men. #genocide
/r/TheRedPill28/05/14 09:55 PM
1

Online dating.
/r/TheRedPill25/05/14 05:37 PM
1

Have you read anything on the sidebars? You sound like you have no understanding of what real, modern feminism is about.
/r/TheRedPill03/05/14 07:54 AM
9

There are plenty of other ways to maintain and create frame without picking someone else's food for them. I don't know why this idea is so popular.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 03:36 PM
10

Bitches ain't worth the effort. Get them on a conveyor belt process. Don't persist with the ones that resist. Instead, increase your frequency.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 03:33 PM
3

Check your privilege! OK, performing check. Checking... Checking... Check complete. Result: Fuck off.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 01:46 AM
12

This is a good opportunity to separate himself from all of his detractors and build a base of support in a new community. Society loves to lynch men, and your only defense is to cut them all off.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 01:40 AM
6

I'm just going to point out that actual capitalists are the furthest thing from "authoritarian dominators." Communism/Marxism inherently requires absolute state control in order to implement its mechanisms, whereas Capitalism is the free market that automatically and dynamically emerges when people are left in a state of unfettered freedom. Please do not conflate the two. TRP is an inherently individualistic and freedom-seeking philosophy, and therefore is aligned with other freedom-seeking phil…
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 01:33 AM
6

Whoever said that TRP is an entirely self-consistent, coherent, formal philosophy? It's a collection of observations and discussions being held over the internet. The evidence that the core points are correct is overwhelming. Ideas on the fringe are open to discussion and interpretation. If the core ideas were questioned/rejected despite overwhelming evidence then it would simply make the idea of rational discussion pointless. You sound more like an anti-rationalist throwing a fit than anything …
/r/TheRedPill02/05/14 01:29 AM
1

I made a post on this topic quite a while ago. It received almost universally positive comments. You will find that most TRP types are capable of recognizing truth.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/14 10:08 AM
1

Indeed, if she didn't self-identify as feminist, no one would take her seriously. It's like talking about "climate science" if you aren't a climatologist. The cyclical, self-referential nature of academic credentialism undermines the perceived legitimacy of any intellectual attacks made by outsiders. This woman is a relic of a bygone age. She is a woman's rights activist who looks around at modern feminism and sees nothing but madness.
/r/TheRedPill30/04/14 09:36 AM
3

You have a deeply internalized sense that doing it would have been morally wrong. You have to internalize the idea that the morality you've been implanted with is a false construction designed to make you defeat yourself. Learn to hate your own sense of morality so that you can overcome it and replace it with truths you've discovered yourself.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/14 06:38 AM
5

You might want to lurk more... you still have much to learn.
/r/TheRedPill01/04/14 05:44 PM
11

As everyone else here realizes, the woman is the problem. The man is getting his life together and improving himself. She's resentful about not being the more powerful one in the relationship anymore. The entire article reads follows a progression-- it's as though she's trying to convince herself that he's doing something wrong and that he no longer deserves her love, and you can see it as the tone changes. This is a good example of female love being conditional. Typically, a woman's love will i…
/r/TheRedPill01/04/14 05:00 PM
13

Sounds like you were playing shitty time-waster games like LoL and WoW. By all means, anyone working on self-improvement should avoid those types of games like the plague. But video games can be much more than that if you apply a refined sense of taste to how you're spending your time with them. They can be social experiences. They can also be a method of mental improvement if you challenge yourself. I limit myself to playing 1 or 2 games at a time. Naturally, when I get bored of them, I find ot…
/r/TheRedPill28/03/14 10:26 AM
2

This is a good observation.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/14 10:56 AM
5

True observation here... much of modern psychology is a bunch of backwards rationalizations about why people behave the way they do without acknowledging the real underlying causes (TRP truths).
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 10:46 AM
20

The fact that you've made it to this stage means you are further along than most people. The real journey is mental; one's lifestyle is merely a reflection of their habitual mental state. Changing your mind is harder than changing your life. I don't know if you play video games or RPGs, but you're basically like a level 1 character starting from nothing. This is a good thing because it means you get to design your life and who you are from scratch. You can see beyond the influence and controls t…
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 10:15 AM
9

If you're fucking a woman and she mentions that other guys are fucking her, she's communicating one of the following things: 1) I don't want you to get the idea that this will become an exclusive relationship 2) I want to make you jealous so that this might become an exclusive relationship 3) Feminism has confused me into thinking that men will consider me more sexually attractive if I broadcast that I'm fucking other dudes 4) I'm an obnoxious, oblivious person and I don't think for a second abo…
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 09:51 AM
1

Alright, scratch that, you're pretty dedicated if you're a $140k software engineer. Taking up another time consuming hobby when you are feeling a sense of longing inside of yourself would probably just be exhausting. If you're set on the idea that finding a woman is what you need to do, then I recommend online dating. With a software engineer's mindset, you should be able to make it work. Contact many, many women and refine your technique over time. I have been using OKCupid for a long time and …
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 09:31 AM
3

I don't think it's satire. It's the harsh reality, but reality itself has become so twisted that it is merely a satire of what reality should be. The woman who wrote this article (if it was indeed a woman) seems to understand that women have an unfairly privileged position in life. It could be perceived as humor or satire by people who don't understand that it's actually entirely true. (The tagging as satire was probably not done by the original author.) The only questionable aspect is whether t…
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 09:27 AM
1

Dedicate yourself to developing a particular skill. Become someone who has more important or interesting things to worry about than women. If you were going to kill yourself anyway, there shouldn't be any problem with dedicating yourself to the grinding repetition required to master a skill of your choice.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 06:49 AM
2

I think you need to up your reading comprehension.
/r/TheRedPill19/03/14 01:38 AM
2

It is that easy.
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 07:43 PM
8

One of the most effective principles you can use in life is to never grasp on to something so hard that you are willing to bend your principles. Your life and lifestyle should be an extension of your principles; they come first and are unyielding. Anyone who wants to come along for the ride must obey the rules and standards you have set. Be fair and give second chances, but anyone who is unwilling to change must go. That includes a wife or LTR partner. As long as you follow this principle you wi…
/r/TheRedPill04/03/14 04:51 PM
2

Ayn Rand.
/r/TheRedPill26/02/14 10:54 AM
14

Hmm... this would explain why most women are obstinately idealistic about the world even in the face of concrete evidence to the contrary. To the extent that they will become hostile if you try to lay down the reality on them (not even talking about RP truths). Shit like believing everyone can have an ideal career or that everyone in the world has good intentions...
/r/TheRedPill24/02/14 07:44 AM
70

If a woman wants to do porn for money then it's her right. Money is powerful and her sexuality isn't so sacred and untouchable that it isn't worth selling. It's also the right of self-respecting men to not get involved with her sexually or romantically if it bothers them (which it should). I also think she has a right to be annoyed that people are making her personal info public and harassing her at school. I'd have some degree of sympathy for the harassment if it didn't turn into a man-hating f…
/r/TheRedPill22/02/14 01:02 AM
4

That woman will get nothing from a self-respecting man.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/14 11:15 PM
1

Not a good idea to get married.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/14 11:14 PM
-1

Why not go for a one-sided open relationship? Tell her that you want to be free to spin plates and even bring women home for threesomes. Be up-front that this arrangement is one-sided, and although many people might consider it "unfair," there are fundamental differences between males and females that mean that men can sleep around without ruining their relationship at home. If she doesn't go for it then no loss; break up and you'll be free. If she does go for it, it will only strengthen your re…
/r/TheRedPill19/02/14 11:13 PM
11

I had to log in just to say that this post is brilliant.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 07:28 PM
2

You can't just assume that any usage of a word by a particular author within a particular context can be treated as any or all possible definitions of that word. Literary analysis isn't for everyone.
/r/TheRedPill16/02/14 12:00 AM
-2

That's your interpretation... and in that context the statement makes more sense. But it's dangerous to agree with a quote that supposes the fundamental nature of man as cannon fodder or murderer. Why is it that men can do any number of things that "simulate" battle in order to become "real men," whereas women must actually go through the process of physical child birth (and not merely "simulated" child birth) in order to become "real women"? The quote is not self-consistent unless it is referri…
/r/TheRedPill15/02/14 11:52 PM
8

Mencken's views on war were not entirely self-consistent. Although he was firmly against America's involvement in WW2, he also romanticized the notion of war itself, viewing it as an inevitable consequence of human nature and something that humans deeply enjoy (thus why it happens so frequently). "Stood in battle," in this context, may or may not have a singular meaning of standing on the battlefield in the context of a war. However, it does undoubtedly have the context of a TRUE battle that inv…
/r/TheRedPill15/02/14 11:49 PM
1

Going to war as a rite of passage is idiotic. The big generational wars were absolutely nothing but a genocide against males enacted by states and large corporations. Glamorizing conscription and genocide of the male gender is not what TRP should be about.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/14 11:24 PM
0

Because when you are using logic you need to compare apples to apples and oranges. We're talking about analyzing the meaning of the aforementioned quotes-- and the author's intention is absolutely literal when it comes to both war and childbirth. You can't simply make half of the quote metaphorical (when it isn't intended to be so) and then agree with it.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/14 11:23 PM
4

No, you are out of context. The writing is literal. It means literal war on a literal battlefield.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/14 11:21 PM
0

Sexism should be defined as something that actually makes sense-- like viewing males as disposable war fodder. TRP is about self fulfillment, not state enslavement and conscription and arbitrary manhood rituals.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/14 11:21 PM
-1

If that's what you think, then you don't agree with the original quote. Point proven.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/14 11:19 PM
0

That isn't what the writing means. The quote is literal. It means actual war.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/14 11:18 PM
0

Taking battle as metaphorical in this sense would completely change the meaning of the author because it's being compared to something which is distinctly non-metaphorical (childbirth). Unless you want to say that women can metaphorically become mothers by showing love and affection to children...? It simply means that the originator of the quote is wrong and his views should be replaced with something that does not view men as disposable battle fodder.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/14 08:46 PM
3

I believe H.L. Mencken means battle in the literal sense of physical violence. Otherwise it would not make any sense to compare it to childbirth, which isn't something that one can experience metaphorically.
/r/TheRedPill15/02/14 08:45 PM
15

Yes he is, and he is full of shit. Expecting men to "stand on the battlefield" is nothing but an example of men being considered the expendable meat-shields of society. Self- or societally- inflicted harm that is considered a necessity to be "manly" is pure sexism and should be the sort of thing that TRP stands firmly against. Leaving that topic aside, I also do not agree that all women need to have children in order to be "real women." Stop conflating the issue of childlessness with feminism-in…
/r/TheRedPill15/02/14 08:13 PM
8

MGM in America is not a religious practice. It's a socially enshrined pseudo-medical practice that has many pillars holding it in place, only one of which is religious tradition. Shall I enumerate them? 1) Religious tradition - This was the original source of the problem, but now that it has been enshrined both culturally and medically it is no longer the primary driving force. It is only relevant because banning it would be seen as an affront to religion (see: the debacle that occured a few yea…
/r/MensRights27/01/14 05:29 PM
1

Except you were the one who initially stated that discrimination against men is more "subtle." On the contrary; it is overt. Don't start a line of discussion that you can't back up with facts.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 05:15 PM
-1

Of course women are discriminated against. Just not as much as men, and with not as much severity, and in more subtle ways. (Here in the USA. My statements do not pertain to elsewhere.) The reason I mentioned genital mutilation in the first place was to contradict your idea that the discrimination that men face is in any way subtle. It is outrageous, severe, and immediately obvious. This has everything to do with feminism's fight against the MRM. Many feminists support and/or directly cause thes…
/r/MensRights27/01/14 05:10 PM
0

This is the actual reality of the situation. I'm sorry if it makes you too depressed and you'd rather not acknowledge it. However, if you were a man walking around with a mutilated penis 24/7, you might have no choice but to acknowledge it.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 05:03 PM
-1

most people think that men fighting for rights are anti-woman. that's what it looks like when you know nothing about it. This is what they want to believe. It is not merely a matter of ignorance. It's a choice. That is not to say that there is less discrimination faced by men, but it is definitely more deep-rooted and subtle How is genital mutilation, which is banned for women and legal to inflict on men, in any way subtle? People know this, and they love to do anything possible to justify it. A…
/r/MensRights27/01/14 04:50 PM
-1

What does "getting anywhere" mean? What is the standard of "getting somewhere" that people often criticize the MRM for failing to do? If it were getting nowhere, no one would know about it and no one would be talking about it. It's getting places alright, it's just that the near-universal reaction to it is irrational knee-jerk hatred. And if there's "no winning" in a battle against feminism, then the fight is already lost. Feminism in its current form must die before men's rights can make any se…
/r/MensRights27/01/14 04:34 PM
12

90% of this culture reveres feminism as a legitimate movement that can do no wrong. 99% of this culture views MRM as a hateful, bigoted movement, directly due to the fact that it is seen as anti-feminist, and therefore obviously wrong. We are on the same level as racists and neo-nazis. You are severely lacking in perspective if you believe that it's merely my own opinion that virtually no one (in the larger cultural sense) is listening. There is only criticism and belittlement.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 04:24 PM
12

I am happy you have a voice We don't have a voice. 99% of the USA hates anything associated with MRM.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 04:18 PM
5

A ring would make her think twice about cheating. Yes, she will spend twice as much time thinking about how much money she'll get to take from you when she cheats and divorces you.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 04:14 PM
1

I guess you could break it down almost infinitely, if you really wanted to. It's more of a spectrum than a set of discrete categories.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 04:13 PM
36

I would put the tiers more like this: Slut Tier - all women start here. Fling Tier - worthy of just enough effort to fuck them. Fuck Friend Tier - has shown enough value to be a friend while you fuck them. If the fucking stops the friendship stops. Relationship Tier - trial period for long term partner; do not overly enmesh your life with hers; still be on the lookout for other options. Long Term Partner Tier - this is the highest tier, reserved for someone worthy of trust. Do not marry.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 03:19 AM
3

Posted that it was a logical consequence of her own choices and actions. Preparing for shitstorm.
/r/TheRedPill26/01/14 06:55 PM
2

Getting vagina is not worth risking your life. I would prefer to have sex with a woman who has at least a modicum of sanity. I say this is why you should never have sex with a feminist.
/r/TheRedPill26/01/14 04:46 PM
5

So after your gf said that you in fact did not rape her, how did the conversation continue, or did you drop it? If it were me: "So then, despite the fact that my actions met your definition of rape, they were not rape? Does that mean your definition is wrong, or does that mean that your personal perception of the event overrules any kind of logical interpretation?" At this point steam would be coming out of her ears and she would probably accuse you of twisting her words. "In other words, is rap…
/r/TheRedPill26/01/14 04:42 PM
1

The tech industry isn’t still predominantly white and male because white men are better at their jobs than everyone else Actually, that's exactly why it's still predominantly white and male.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/14 04:53 PM
1

There's something to be said for being the only man in the room.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/14 04:41 PM
1

I agree. I have no intention of ever getting married, nor would I ever date a girl whose goal is marriage.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/14 02:26 AM
1

Society exists as a concept and as an observable emergent phenomenon. However, it isn't a thing or a person, and it doesn't have consciousness or rights. Only individual humans have thoughts, goals, morals, and experiences, which are the basis of philosophy and morality. This is why we must always make philosophical judgments from the perspective of the individual. If humans could work together en masse, I'm sure great things could be accomplished, but that would be somewhat of a fundamental cha…
/r/TheRedPill18/01/14 02:21 AM
2

Well, I didn't create this thread to debate philosophical concepts or evangelize Objectivism. It seems that you understand the connections between Objectivist philosophy (and egoistic philosophy in general) with TRP, so deeper discussion of philosophy would just be off-topic. I appreciate the thoughtful reply though.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/14 02:12 AM
1

I haven't looked particularly deeply into neo-Objectivism, but the problem is always: when you give people free reign to inject their own perspectives into a philosophy, you're going to get a morass of incoherent/incompatible results. I can see why classical Objectivists would criticize its community for this reason. That is the justification for Objectivism being a "closed" system... it's a record of Ayn Rand's personal philosophy. And since rational self-interest begets constant improvement, a…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 08:05 AM
1

I believe that's why TRP felt like such a natural fit for me, as well.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 05:57 AM
1

I'm not sure I'd call myself "an Objectivist" either. That's because properly calling oneself that requires strict adherence to the entire philosophy as it was written by Rand, since it was her philosophy. I only agree with 98% of it, and I think it's an incomplete philosophy (in that it doesn't give enough information by itself to actually live by it), so by definition I wouldn't be one either. But yeah, I very rarely see anyone attack Objectivism in a way that doesn't make them look like an id…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 05:56 AM
1

I feel like your post deserves a reply but I don't have much to add to it. It's like the Family Guy episode where Stewie travels into a future where Christianity never existed and civilization is thousands of years more advanced. Feminism holds the human race back just as much-- imagine if it had been around for thousands of years. We'd still be in the dark ages.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 03:45 AM
1

I'm glad we were able to come to an understanding. This subreddit is one of the most reasonable places I've found on the internet.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 03:41 AM
2

This is one of the most basic misunderstandings of Objectivism. Objectivism does not claim that any of its points are universal or "objective" in the absolute sense. They are only objective facts relative to the context of a human being living on planet Earth. To expect any more of an absolute standard than this to exist is to expect a "god-like" arbiter to impose absolutes, and that is something that doesn't and never will exist. Even so, all humans have their own hierarchy of values, which aff…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 03:34 AM
2

I don't want to turn this thread into a discussion of the details of my personal life, but it is fair to ask whether I have personally seen or enacted an example of the philosophy I'm discussing. The answer is yes, I have enacted this philosophy in my personal life and I have a woman that wholeheartedly believes the things I am saying, but it was by no means an easy process to reach that point. We also practice what you could call "one-sided polyamory," where she is fine with me meeting and fuck…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 03:22 AM
1

I think you're right, in a general sense. However, understanding what an ideal dynamic would look like isn't a service you're doing for "the other side," it's merely an additional source of knowledge for yourself. It is possible that someone who looks too deeply into this line of reasoning would make the mistake of being overly generous and having heightened expectations of the opposite gender. I would caution people to avoid making this mistake. This knowledge has virtually no application withi…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 01:43 AM
2

Let's be careful about the phrase "traditional morality" since that is a rather loaded term. What we're discussing here is a markedly non-traditional form of morality. Philosophy, in the correct sense of the word, is a rational tool. It is not a dogma. Correct philosophy by its very definition must be rational and produce productive results. Another way to state that is: if it doesn't work in real life, it's wrong, and thus it's not correct philosophy. The great thing about individualistic philo…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 01:17 AM
2

*your
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 01:09 AM
1

Wow, so there was someone with an irrational hatred of Objectivism, even in this subreddit. Not even worth replying to.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 01:09 AM
1

I don't really agree with your attempt to summarize. Putting things into somewhat-arbitrary categories doesn't do much to improve understanding. In particular, a dichotomy between what's visible and what's intelligible flies directly in the face of Objectivist epistemology. I also do not frame hypergamy as inherently being immoral. It is a core aspect of female sexuality. It can, however, lead to immoral behavior (and typically does in modern society). I advocate reason and self-mastery in order…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 01:07 AM
1

You're right, anything that explicitly acknowledges the hidden truths behind how society functions is met with outrage. This applies to both Objectivism and TRP.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 01:03 AM
1

I didn't come here merely to evangelize Objectivism, but the overlap is so obvious to someone that's familiar with it. Anyone who is interested in the intellectual side of TRP would be doing themselves a favor by either reading Ayn Rand's books or simply reading about Objectivist philosophy from an Objectivist source, such as Leonard Peikoff's website.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 01:02 AM
2

Turns out I don't need to reply to j_arbuckle since RandianHero already argued my point for me. Given your username, I guess thread falls under your area of expertise, right?
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 12:59 AM
1

I can see that you have a couple valid points: 1) Hypergamy is dangerous in an environment where options for new men are extremely abundant. Even if you're a 10/10, chances are your woman "could" find an 11/10 if she looks hard enough. Or at least someone that looks like an 11/10. The obesity epidemic is an apt comparison. 2) The Red Pill isn't about changing the rules, merely observing them and learning to play them better. Trying to spread a new moral philosophy is something that's impractical…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 12:56 AM
2

You're right, all moral philosophies need a goal as a starting point. Under Objectivism, that goal is your own life, your own goals, and your own happiness as an individual. Because nothing exists other than individuals, there is no higher cause or goal than the value of an individual. The concept of society is merely an abstraction that carries no moral weight at all. So, being an individual, you can choose your own goal and your own optimal philosophy to achieve it. The thing is, to the extent…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 12:47 AM
1

The Is-Ought dichotomy is stupid. "I can see and describe the world, but anything I say based on my observations carries no weight whatsoever because any description of the way the world should be is based on naught." It's nothing but utter denial of man's rational faculties. It is nihilism.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 12:38 AM
2

This guy gets it. One of the weaknesses of Objectivism itself (or should I say: something that does not fall under its umbrella) is that it does not describe sociological phenomena, or provide sufficient guidance on HOW to move your life towards the ideals it presents. It may teach you how to move yourself toward that goal, but it says little on how to deal with other people without ejecting them from your life completely, which is not always an option. The Red Pill is the other half of the equa…
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 12:35 AM
1

Under Objectivism, philosophy (and morality, which is a subset of philosophy) is dictated by your own individual logical reasoning and observation of reality. It is not necessary to have society's permission to implement your own moral compass and follow it in your own life.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 12:32 AM
1

The only magnetic field you need is your own personal philosophy. You can also surround yourself with friends and an SO that understand and agree with this philosophy. Forget what the rest of society believes, because it's irrelevant if you don't let it affect you. Build a wall to guard yourself from it.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 12:30 AM
1

Neither trying to make men like women nor quashing a fundamental element of female sexuality makes any sense. I am saying that the female herself can and should learn to control the negative, irrational aspects of her own nature that are caused by hypergamy, while at the same time embracing the positive aspect of it-- that which allows her to worship her chosen man.
/r/TheRedPill17/01/14 12:28 AM
5

Sexual strategy is a sociological phenomenon that arises from biologically inherited behaviors. It is an emergent property of male and female physiology, which is in turn a result of evolution. The idea I am positing is that men and women (men more easily than women) can rise above their biological programming and, contrary to suppressing it, control and guide it in a direction that facilitates their long term rational happiness, as opposed to the hedonistic branch-swinging that feminism encoura…
/r/TheRedPill16/01/14 12:46 PM
3

Precisely.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/14 12:41 PM
6

This perspective takes a very narrow view of what falls under the purview of philosophy. This isn't a slight on you, since philosophy is normally defined in extremely narrow terms, which completely removes its usefulness in everyday life. Thus, people are not used to thinking of it in such broad terms. For the purposes of this thread, let's consider a basic definition of philosophy as: the methodology used for making any choice that has a positive or negative influence the accomplishment of one'…
/r/TheRedPill16/01/14 12:17 PM
3

I think that viewing TRP as nothing more than a strategy for maximizing results in sexual competition is missing the point. Because it addresses such a fundamental and important facet of life, it's more than that: it's a philosophy of action. Spreading understanding and truth is an end unto itself, and the goal that is being accomplished is the improvement in quality of life of everyone (male or female) who understands the truth in these perspectives.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/14 12:09 PM
8

A quick clarification: Hypergamy is a highly loaded word. Let us define the typical usage within this context as: irrational choices that women make which ruin the stability of relationships and harm the long-term happiness of both individuals. This is a perfect example of a behavior that can rightly be called immoral because it causes nothing but harm and betrayal. This is also the case in point as to why sexual strategy is absolutely a moral choice. However, the term hypergamy also refers to a…
/r/TheRedPill16/01/14 11:55 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter