TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Heinz37_sauce Archive

View 0 posts and 110 comments by Heinz37_sauce on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Depends on how long the guy in question has been unemployed. Maybe, maybe not.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/26 12:39 PM
1

Even if this were so, the doctrine would be limited to a requirement to give one’s wife an orgasm.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/01/26 05:57 PM
1

Except when the “yourself” in question is a spineless wimp.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/01/26 11:18 PM
11

Because “approaching women” and “not approaching women” results in the same outcome?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/26 04:37 PM
2

A castrated man can still rape and molest. All that’s prevented is impregnation.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/12/25 03:50 AM
7

If we’re truly talking about what someone did 12 years ago versus what the the same person does today, then I agree with you OP. Where the discussion goes off the rails is when someone behaved substantially different 12 days ago than they do today.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/11/25 03:39 PM
5

How “redpill” do any of you suppose Reagan or Dubya were/are? I have a difficult time envisioning it.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/25 08:12 PM
2

Should people who only get hookups lament the fact that they are not relationship material?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/25 08:26 PM
1

Maybe not. Don’t you think at least a few female pornstars would refuse him?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/25 05:18 PM
1

James Carville and Mary Matalin, the political operatives.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/25 08:08 PM
4

What if a particular insult toward a particular person also happens to be the truth? Is it no longer an insult? In many jurisdictions, truth is a legal defense against libel/slander/defamation.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/25 01:08 AM
2

Have you ever heard of an amateur athlete whose announced goal was to be the #2 pick in the draft?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/25 04:24 PM
1

I’d say it’s the adult version of a first grader calling another first grader a “doodyhead” at school.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/12/24 05:54 AM
2

Do you think that Great Grandma and Great Grandpa got married at the ages of 17 and 18 because they wanted to ?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/24 08:36 PM
1

Indeed, but they aren’t prescient. They won’t know whether he will make them cum until he does… or doesn’t.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/24 07:35 PM
1

Not everyone wants to pay their federal income taxes either 🤷🏻‍♂️
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 03:52 PM
2

Do I like it? Not at all. But as a cishet male I’ve come to accept that how I personally feel about it doesn’t much matter.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 02:00 PM
1

Unless, of course, the boyfriend actually does have an STD and knows it, in which case she should be leaving him. But how would she know for sure?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/23 01:24 PM
2

Given all the tight smiles, the pretending to be flattered, and the “I have a boyfriend”, how can any man know whether there’s mutual attraction without….. asking?!
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/23 08:49 AM
2

To me, fat = obese. None of the women in the title photo are truly fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/23 05:45 PM
2

I disagree. I think many dudes who find themselves in the friendzone do so because they didn’t hide their romantic feelings (when their lady “friend” probably wishes they did), and her response was “Let’s just be friends”.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 04:45 AM
3

Sounds like all three of these super good-looking guys had their opportunity and blew it. I must ask you, though, if any of them (or all of them) had been “average Joes”, would you even have gone on dates with them? After all, it was time spent with each of these guys that allowed you to determine your incompatibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/23 03:24 AM
1

What’s that old joke about progressive men turning conservative on their daughter’s 13th birthday?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/23 08:58 PM
2

This may well be true. I was a Boy Scout back in the 80’s when, not only were there no girls in the troop, but gay men were prohibited from being troop leaders as well. Practically all of the leaders were dads whose sons were members of the troop (and at least in my area, there was some stigma against men without sons becoming troop leaders, even if those men were married). Were there sex scandals back then? Absolutely there were. But not like today. And aside from some kids being thought of as …
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/22 04:20 PM
0

One never can tell. I view the idea of saying one doesn’t date coworkers when one MIGHT date a different coworker… as not dissimilar from saying one “isn’t ready for a relationship” but omitting the “with you.” Sure, she (or he) might not call you out on it directly, but it definitely wouldn’t go unnoticed. And since we’re talking about one’s professional /work reputation, it’s very easy for rumors to spread about how a person is untrustworthy, or “goes back on their word”. Unless this is simply…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 09:31 PM
16

This is good advice ONLY if not dating coworkers actually is your personal boundary. If at some future time, some other coworker “rings your bell” and she finds out, things can turn very ugly very quickly.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/22 05:32 PM
14

He can certainly ASK OUT women who “also have a bad face”, as you delicately put it. However, whether those women say “yes” is another matter and outside of the OP’s control.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/07/22 12:25 AM
1

Your veto power may be useless, but you would still have your proposal power! You would still be free to ask out anybody you find attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/22 10:31 PM
1

I disagree that proposal power is stronger than veto power. A proposal is just that….. a suggestion. If a guy asks out fifty different women and all fifty of them say no, he is dateless and powerless (and S.O.L.)
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/22 07:25 PM
6

As an overweight and financially successful man myself, my experience has been that overweight women aren’t really any more interested in me than fit women are.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/22 06:41 PM
1

Ever been on the “receiving” end of a police baton? That is (potentially) the physical danger men face from being perceived as aggressive and creepy. Is this different from the physical danger that women face? Absolutely! But it is physical danger still.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/22 08:19 AM
3

Men want the woman to not only be “exceptionally great” but also to physically desire him as well. The best method a man has for measuring this is how quickly she is willing to sleep with him.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 10:23 PM
-1

The divorced woman who was dealt the shit sandwich still - at some point - said “YES” to the shit sandwich when he proposed. Else she wouldn’t be divorced.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 10:07 PM
2

Hasn’t the base of political conservatism traditionally been older, religious, MARRIED people? Hence not sexually unsuccessful.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 01:15 AM
10

And even this “8” assumes that, a) she was still a virgin when she started college, and b) she graduated college in four years. And as we all know, both of these assumptions are less valid today than a generation ago.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/22 06:33 PM
2

All of this was true a hundred years ago, too — especially the maternal mortality (which while still unacceptably high, was certainly higher a century ago). None of this stopped my grandparents or my great-grandparents (none of whom went to college) from getting married in their early 20’s and having 4 or 5 children.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 07:06 PM
2

Nevertheless, once those children exist… they exist. Rest assured that they are family to someone. Perhaps to him. Perhaps to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 01:50 PM
4

Having a family is absolutely possible with anybody one sleeps with (of the opposite gender, of course). And hookup guy gets that opportunity first, before boyfriend guy (never mind husband guy).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 04:30 AM
1

What does “in the past” mean? Last year? Three weeks ago? The day before yesterday?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/22 02:59 AM
1

“Deserve” is the operative word here. I agree that one only DESERVES to be treated as special by their committed partner. However one must somehow stand out as special in some manner, in order to get a potential partner interested in commitment. Isn’t that what we all refer to as the “spark”?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/02/22 06:21 PM
4

And what is the usual response, when that suggestion is made to women?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/01/22 01:09 PM
2

Most higher-paying careers in healthcare (nursing, pharmacy, PT/OT, etc.) have been 50% or more female for a few decades now. And even MD’s themselves are trending in that direction, if one looks at medical school enrollment.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/01/22 09:22 AM
13

If I was 50 or 60 and had a 30 year old wife, I’d know for sure she wasn’t with me for looooooove. I may be a dude, but I’m not delusional.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/01/22 08:14 AM
1

Can’t happen if the average women are still saying NO to casual sex with the average men. The only way this could still happen in that scenario is if the couples are agreeing to be BF/GF prior to their first time sleeping together, and the men are then dumping the women after their “first time”.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/01/22 08:40 AM
6

I’m curious to know (if you don’t mind sharing) — how long were you acquainted with your long-time FWB before you became sexually attracted to him? I believe you said in another comment that this is the first guy you slept with.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/01/22 01:49 AM
1

Letting a single rejection fester into bitterness does indeed show emotional immaturity. When rejection occurs again and again and again for years? It’s hard to NOT let it bother. Ever wonder why baseball pinch hitters in critical situations are almost never the guy with the .090 batting average?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/01/22 11:19 PM
1

When one “friend” is straight and the other is gay, rather than both being straight (or both gay) with unreciprocated attraction, the situations are not directly comparable. Apples vs. oranges
/r/PurplePillDebate04/12/21 08:31 AM
1

“Sexually attracted to” and “have feelings for” are two different things. See: FWB.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 05:45 PM
48

I would be very curious to know whether the women in this scenario would evaluate the guy’s past for consistency - that is, did he make ALL of his past girlfriends wait. The reverse has been discussed in this subreddit ad nauseum.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/11/21 02:33 AM
1

The ugly woman still has to reciprocate first. If she does not, nothing has been “solved”.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/11/21 10:12 PM
6

“Let’s Just Be Friends”
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/21 10:11 AM
7

Suppose a guy does ask a woman out straight away, rather than befriending her under underhanded/false pretenses. Suppose the woman’s response is “LJBF”. How do you believe the guy should respond to this?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/11/21 09:58 AM
2

Pop may have struggled. However, we can’t really know how women of my mother’s generation would have dealt with the swipe apps and the sudden absence of the sloot shaming that was pervasive when she was a young woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/21 10:10 PM
3

For a woman, “romantically unsuccessful” and “sexually unsuccessful” are indeed two distinct things. For a guy, however, these things are hopelessly intertwined. A man who women aren’t sexually attracted to, regardless of the reason, has pretty much zero chance to form a connection deeper than “just friends” with any woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/21 02:25 PM
6

In this scenario, what would be the reasoning for a post-menopausal or otherwise infertile woman to avoid dating an unattractive man?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/21 05:14 AM
1

Context is important. How long have you known each other? Did you just meet each other last weekend, or are you former coworkers who have already known each other for 4 years? If the latter, what additional information might you gain by waiting a few dates that you didn’t already have after knowing each other for years?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/11/21 10:59 AM
1

This sounds like the flip side of “I just want a nice guy who will listen to me and treat me with respect.”
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 05:14 PM
1

Thinking of this in the context of only the men with the “best” DNA being able to reproduce, where “best” usually (but not always) means “most physically attractive of the options available to me”…. I’ve always found it interesting that the same standards are applied even when having children is not desired, heck even when having children is not physically possible.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/10/21 05:11 PM
1

The 2016 US Presidential election suggests the opposite, if you take pre-election voter polling to equal “words”, and the actual outcome of the election to equal “actions”.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 08:38 AM
3

If practice makes perfect, then “sexually unskilled” is a natural consequence of “no one wants to f@ck”. Although if no one truly wants to f@ck, who exactly is able to judge sexual skill?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/10/21 08:31 AM
2

A 5’10” adult male with a 33 inch waist is not overweight, regardless of what the charts say.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/10/21 12:07 PM
3

If both partners “can’t cook” and “don’t like to clean the bathroom or wash dishes”, that’s equality and bringing similar things to the relationship, yet it’s entirely unhelpful for both of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/21 12:35 PM
1

And Mormons and Evangelicals, in general, tend to not use birth control and have more children than average. This =//= to not enjoying sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/10/21 07:34 PM
1

Is it only COMPLETE baldness that’s intimidating, or does horseshoe hair have that effect too? What about combovers?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/10/21 06:38 PM
1

Most football head coaches at the pro level sucked as players (or were mediocre at best). Same with baseball managers.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/10/21 10:36 PM
0

Would this miracle drug also prevent next morning regret, or whatever the female analogue to “post-nut clarity“ is called? If not, then I’d want to steer clear of it!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/21 03:35 AM
10

Not sure if I agree with #6, unless you change that to “over 50”.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/09/21 03:19 AM
31

Men have three main “options” for avoiding fatherhood: 1. Abstinence 2. Condoms 3. Vasectomy The first two of these “options” are complained about regularly, including on PPD.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/09/21 09:17 PM
1

Do women (in general) not receive validation from men who (respectfully) approach/ask them out? Or is this “validating” only when the attraction is reciprocated?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/09/21 04:31 PM
1

Funny how the natural fathers are said to look like Homer Simpson only AFTER the kids are born. If he’d actually looked like Homer beforehand, he…. ummm…..might not have become a father.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/08/21 05:03 PM
1

They are two different things, yet temporally related. How does one come to be desired in a relationship? Seems it has to start first by desiring/being desired by someone you’re NOT in a relationship with.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/08/21 11:52 PM
1

My point is that she apparently finds him attractive enough despite his hygiene. The OP’s point seems to be that If she didn’t, she wouldn’t be with him.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 05:41 PM
1

Since when was OnlyFans a dating site?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 02:14 PM
–

Consider the case of a homeless woman living on skid row. Do you suppose she finds her also-homeless, unwashed, unshaven, stinky male partner attractive or sexually appealing?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 02:13 PM
–

Would you contend that a homeless woman on skid row is aroused by her also-homeless, unwashed, unshaven, stinky male partner?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/08/21 02:04 PM
4

If a 400-pound man walks around shirtless and confidently spitting “game”, how successful do you think he would be? And would that lack of success be due to lack of confidence or lack of attractiveness?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/08/21 05:37 PM
4

Good point, but I don’t think STD testing is limited only to annual GYN visits. Don’t couples get STD- tested and share their results before deciding to get “serious”? Certainly this happens more than once a year.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/08/21 07:02 PM
1

Yes, but for most people the skill set improves far more from DOING than from WATCHING. There’s an old baseball adage which states something to the effect that the rookie shortstop isn’t going to improve his defensive skills much by sitting on on the bench and watching the starting shortstop play ball. The rookie needs to be out on the diamond playing ball. Not every rookie SS can become Derek Jeter, but for sure won’t by just watching other guys play.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/08/21 12:23 PM
0

The distinction here is that, in order for any man to be in a position to make Margot Robbie pay for her own meal, Ms. Robbie would first have to have said “YES” when approached. If I approached Margot Robbie tomorrow, I cannot imagine her answer would be anything other than “Hell NO, get away from me!”. If you were approached tomorrow by Chris Hemsworth or Leo DiCaprio or another male actor/musician/model you find attractive, how would you respond? If your answer would be anything other than “H…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/07/21 11:33 AM
3

Even if this is true, FAR more than 7% of women are actually having casual sex. If all or most of them know beforehand that they are unlikely to orgasm, what might their motive be?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/21 07:27 PM
2

No doubt social media and commercial marketing have an enormous influence. Still, if we’re talking about young girls (“female children” as OP referred to them), I suspect that most girls have their first exposure to these sorts of products in their mother’s jewelry box, or in their big sister’s closet, or at Grandma’s or Aunt Gloria’s house.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/21 03:49 PM
8

So you agree that the answer is “none of the above”.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/21 01:36 PM
13

So who is it exactly that pushes high quality clothes, hygiene products, makeup, jewelry, lotion, and high heels onto female children? Their fathers?! Their brothers?! Their male schoolmates?!
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/21 01:21 PM
4

How exactly does one “have a healthy amount of confidence” while (to use a baseball analogy) batting 0-for-300? That would be like a pinch hitter with a .060 batting average, and when he steps to the plate his teammates start cheering for him to “knock it out of the park!!”
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/21 08:13 AM
0

Actually, there is something else many women can do to address the inequity. What was that ditty Nancy Reagan used to say? “Just say no”? 🤣🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/21 10:20 PM
1

Sounds like what the Chinese government did with the angry “surplus” men who couldn’t find wives as a result of the one child policy. Maybe not outright war, but the unmarried men had their energies redirected to long-term government-assigned projects in order to prevent anti-government uprising.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 09:05 PM
4

How does one assess the personality of someone you’ve never met in person? Seems like this would be highly error-prone without taking note of how they carry themselves, their facial expressions, their mannerisms, the “sparkle” in their eyes, etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/21 04:37 PM
3

The million dollar question is, did these “hoes” make their future husbands wait?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 09:00 PM
2

If all women made all men wait, there’d be no casual sex to be pursued.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 08:45 PM
1

Depends on the timing of that drunken ONS. Was “15 years ago” five years before she met her future husband, or a few days before their first date?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 08:38 PM
1

Depends on whether “15 years ago” was five years before her first date with her future husband or five days before their first date.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 08:26 PM
7

The casual flings certainly aren’t sacrificing sex. You got THAT right. And FWB’s usually aren’t “abandoned in the morning “.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/21 08:11 PM
–

Some dude, at some point, did just that. Otherwise, she wouldn’t be Honey Boo Boo’s MOM.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 11:02 PM
–

The government WON’T do it, because politicians will still need to seek re-election. What would they tell that first age cohort of folks for whom there won’t be Social Security at all? Or for whom the age to start collecting is 143?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 04:50 AM
3

I think one also has to distinguish between an already-existing friendship organically transitioning into romance, and “Let’s be friends first” as a response to being asked out. Two very different “friendship” scenarios.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/21 04:29 AM
1

I will not be “settled for” by anyone, regardless of how hot she is. When I was 21, my grandfather counseled me to look for a woman who is “average in appearance, educated, and unselfish.” I still consider this sage advice.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/07/21 09:04 PM
2

So what is your timeline for determining whether a guy is a good person? Months? Years? Would you be open to a relationship with one of your long-time platonic guy friends? My experience has been that many women would not be.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 08:15 PM
2

What percentage of those children are born to married couples though?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 07:15 PM
1

Yes, many men do have lower standards (than women) as to who they sleep with. But like the chicken and the egg, I think causation is hard to pinpoint. If the “supply” of sex was sufficient to meet the “demand” at a given standard, I suspect there would be less inclination for men to lower their standards. Since the perceived supply is not sufficient, standards go down in the hope of increasing the supply. It is a self-perpetuating cycle.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/21 06:27 PM
2

I think folks (regardless of gender) who are objectively “bottom 20%” a) don’t accept this as fact, and b) aren’t attracted to their looksmatch.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/21 08:48 PM
1

I’m not saying that men necessarily would answer any differently. What I’m saying is that the “truthiness” of the answer will depend on who’s asking the question, regardless of gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/21 05:40 PM
–

How one interprets a statement like “not currently looking for a relationship” depends on the the context of the leading question. Haven’t we all been on the receiving end of a such a statement from someone who had a GF/BF not long after?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/06/21 01:20 PM
1

Some of those “unqualified” applicants could be trainable. It’s the hiring manager who chooses not to do so. Who are you gonna train if no one applies for the position in the first place?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/06/21 11:24 AM
1

Because, in most cases, the men are the ones asking the women out. It is the women who wield the power of the words “no” or “yes”. Therefore the women are the arbiters of whether said relationships ever begin.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/06/21 01:37 AM
0

Is a poor white woman who grew up in a trailer park in small-town West Virginia over-represented or under-represented?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/21 03:36 PM
1

Disagree. It would be like complaining that sports are unfair because men’s hoops and women’s hoops are played by different rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/05/21 03:09 PM
5

Do women who don’t want children/can’t have children also seek “the best available genes”?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/21 10:39 AM
2

“Doesn’t know how to make me cum” is a different scenario entirely from “stopped putting in effort after we got married”.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 03:17 PM
19

Unless these women had never slept with their husbands prior to their wedding night, they already knew this before getting married. And still they said “yes” to the proposal.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/21 07:09 AM
1

Maybe I’m just out of touch on what these terms are supposed to mean.... but I thought a guy who is truly MGTOW would not be interested in a wife - or any other committed relationship with a woman - regardless of her “qualifications.”
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/21 11:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter