TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Helpful_Working_8427 Archive

View 4 posts and 100 comments by Helpful_Working_8427 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

I hope you will get over the phase and find your track. Some years ago, my long time girlfriend started to press me to marry and have kids. She used to work, but on a low-salary profession and wasn't anything close to happy. It was kind of strange, because in one hand, she would be mad if I gave her something (complaining she was not independent). But on the other hand, she wasn't making any effort to improve her situation. When I asked her about how we were supposed to finance kinds and a large…
/r/MensRights24/11/22 01:07 AM
2

There is another problem: Financial consequences. If you have a track of mental health treatment, insurance companies will charge you much higher than they do people with no record. Some professions will also discriminate against you, even if it is not that relevant. A typical case is ADHD. You might be a high functioning individual despite ADHD, but everyone will favor someone with no record for a job (many young people don't realize it when they openly talk about adhd and other mental health i…
/r/MensRights14/11/22 01:59 PM
1

It is
/r/MensRights22/10/22 10:23 PM
1

Kids, you need to learn one thing: wrap it up!
/r/MensRights21/10/22 08:38 PM
1

Yeap... there is probably no
/r/MensRights08/10/22 03:23 PM
0

I have the same opinion about yours
/r/MensRights08/10/22 01:21 PM
0

Crazy person! 🤦
/r/MensRights08/10/22 12:42 PM
1

Facts
/r/MensRights08/10/22 12:24 PM
1

I think it is falsifiable... but they indeef don't want to hear about it
/r/MensRights08/10/22 12:23 PM
0

You asked what the patriarchy is for me... I answered you question. 🤦
/r/MensRights08/10/22 12:22 PM
0

I don't think there is a patriarchy ... I think there are a few share of PEOPLE who are privileged
/r/MensRights08/10/22 10:22 AM
0

My point is about how this power structures were generated in the first place. They have emerged from some proto-structure which developed organically. Society with police officers and firefighters did not appear out of nowhere.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 09:14 AM
1

Have you ever though the people might choose to be protected?
/r/MensRights08/10/22 08:31 AM
0

Where in my argument there is someone telling women they can't do stuff?
/r/MensRights08/10/22 08:15 AM
1

Equal opportunity of what? When some people are supposed to be in the Front line abd risk their lives for other to survive, well that's protection.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 07:38 AM
1

It is hilarious to see u trying so hard to get under my skin for nothing 😅😅. Not gonna work ... Have you ever measured your IQ sweetheart? And why should I try to answer a blatant characterization of what I said? And why to a person who clearly wants to engage in a less than civilized argument? I'm done with you
/r/MensRights08/10/22 06:15 AM
1

Oh really... so why u are basically repeating what I said WHILE simply calling me names? Yiu definitely don't know how to read.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 05:56 AM
1

Dude ... learn how to read
/r/MensRights08/10/22 05:49 AM
1

I guess u didn't read until the end. I don't think there is such a thing as the Patriarchy at all. In fact, yiu interpretation is very "peculiar " to me...
/r/MensRights08/10/22 05:21 AM
2

If you read, my text is trying to find a reason WHY men dominate the political and professional landscapes.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 05:17 AM
6

Facts
/r/MensRights07/10/22 09:16 PM
3

Can you elaborate on that?
/r/MensRights07/10/22 08:07 PM
6

There is this theory that, females subconsciously use sexual attention to bribe men into protective/providing behavior. This is apparently a thing in primatology
/r/MensRights07/10/22 06:22 PM
1

How is marriage supposed to contribute to pay rises?
/r/MensRights07/10/22 02:25 PM
1

Btw... I won't discuss with a fake account with -2 karma any longer
/r/MensRights07/10/22 11:36 AM
1

Unpaid labor? Are u talking about women who split the bills 50/50? I doubt... about men getting well paid because of women. You are delusional. At the same moment men get a family they stop taking chances and stop being willing to move for better positions. This significantly reduces their chances to get promotions or better jobs. This "theory" of your does not sums up to any thing valuable. Are you a woman or not?
/r/MensRights07/10/22 11:35 AM
1

You now correlation is not causation, don't you?
/r/MensRights07/10/22 11:30 AM
1

Oh... are u not? You really have serious interpretation problems... In many careers men and women DON'T in general have the same proficiency. My claim is that 2 people who have, should be paid same. Why being married would benefit men in their careers? That's make no sense. High paid men get married because they are high paid - they have plenty of options. It post fact though. Marrying to early is the worse thing you can do for your career as a man. AND for your prospects of finding a high-value…
/r/MensRights07/10/22 11:12 AM
1

What the hell are u talking about Lady? The point I'm making is that there should not be discrimination based on gender. People with similar career choices should be able get similar bags. I think most feminists who actually care about equality would agree. I also don't care if stay-home men or women get less paid than the average person (they are taking care of home) if it works for them. This is a choice. To be clear: SAME JOB at SAME PROFICIENCY should pay same. But your argument is: marriage…
/r/MensRights07/10/22 10:31 AM
1

Mariage rates getting down only fir women? Still ... why a group should be better paid only because it can get a pay cut in the future? It does not make an sense.
/r/MensRights06/10/22 12:04 PM
1

Cannot say about other guys... I'm Single & Childless by option.
/r/MensRights05/10/22 04:00 PM
0

"Women who have never been married and are childless earn 117 percent of their childless male counterparts. (This comparison controls for education, hours worked and age.)" What part of counterpart can't you understand?
/r/MensRights05/10/22 09:40 AM
1

Read again
/r/MensRights05/10/22 09:35 AM
0

Someone posted an archive link above... Still: Don't talk shit without knowing the facts. You have been exposed
/r/MensRights05/10/22 08:39 AM
2

Thx
/r/MensRights05/10/22 08:22 AM
1

The appeal to personal offenses sounds like music to me 😅😅
/r/MensRights05/10/22 08:22 AM
1

I think that's exactly the comparison
/r/MensRights05/10/22 08:03 AM
3

You didn't read the article, because the 17% takes education, worked hours and type of job into account. You are spreading your prejudice without even reading. Blame on you
/r/MensRights05/10/22 07:59 AM
2

And 17% in the women's favor for similar career/parenting choices. So what is more likely to be statistical fluctuation and what is more likely to be bias and discrimination? 1-2% or 17-40%?
/r/MensRights05/10/22 07:46 AM
2

Oh ... I know ... I'm one of those. But women are prettier. That's why female models earn more ... oh, again the gender gap
/r/MensRights05/10/22 07:22 AM
1

Sales is the word (pretty privilege)
/r/MensRights05/10/22 07:15 AM
1

I'm NOT defensive lady... I'm actively exposing your BS
/r/MensRights05/10/22 07:14 AM
2

It is true for the developed world; in the whole world population is still growing. But you are pretty on point about the housing prices... it surreal to compare with decades ago and it makes very difficult for families to have only one breadwinner
/r/MensRights05/10/22 07:05 AM
2

Does not matter if you specify it or not. You are giving opinions about things you don't read. For this reason alone it's not worth discussing with you. If asking for the bare minimum of reading before commenting is a high horse ... 🤦
/r/MensRights05/10/22 06:59 AM
0

"117% seems a little extrem" If yiu read the article you will find the female sales engineers earn 140% what their make counterparts earn. So ... read the article
/r/MensRights05/10/22 06:39 AM
2

Read the article
/r/MensRights05/10/22 06:35 AM
1

I think this is a separate topic about dahingehend preferences. The point the author is doing is that the primary caretaker of children earns less than the carrier oriented individual regardless of gender. Besides, career oriented women receive more than men who have similar careers' decisions. I know the author wrote a book on the topic, but I don't know exactly how he explains the situation My guess is that the push and public pressure for more women in well pay careers make them even more sca…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 06:34 AM
1

Read the article
/r/MensRights05/10/22 06:16 AM
1

You have not read but has so many opinion to share about the article?
/r/MensRights05/10/22 06:13 AM
1

The author is talking about the US as far as I know
/r/MensRights05/10/22 06:12 AM
1

😅😅😅
/r/MensRights05/10/22 05:53 AM
5

As far as understood, the author just make the comparison among men and women who made similar career choices and concludes women are paid more. But I understand where u are coming from. I particularly have no issue with the lady avoiding kids and pursuing a career. It's her choice I guess. I don't want to be a walker for any women (I did already dodge so bullets), so I like when they make their money AND split the bills as well. But I do have an issue with how the play-field is becoming more an…
/r/MensRights04/10/22 11:23 PM
23

This figures are not corrected by occupation. This is really inaccurate Form of comparing wages
/r/MensRights04/10/22 10:37 PM
3

That's the date I also have in mind. Though it went ar least a little back in the 80s
/r/MensRights04/10/22 10:35 PM
8

I believe so
/r/MensRights04/10/22 10:33 PM
2

Your virulent speach
/r/MensRights04/10/22 10:31 PM
44

Well... according to the author, it is worse than a myth. It is the contrary of what has been claimed
/r/MensRights04/10/22 09:38 PM
27

I agree
/r/MensRights04/10/22 09:05 PM
5

Have you ever heard of overuse? I don't give yiu any explanation of the wage gap, because I don't believe it exists
/r/MensRights04/10/22 09:02 PM
15

Bro ... I'm trying to keep the scientific analysis here. I'm 100% against this pay gap bullshit we hear everywhere. But we can keep the conversation with arguments better than just "this is feminism bullshit ". There is a lot of feminist bullshit outthere... but we gotta communicate better than they if we want to shut it down
/r/MensRights04/10/22 07:41 PM
19

Not necessarily. .. it implies that some correction (affirmative action) was applied to achieve a target (supposedly equality ). But I see where u are coming from. It might be that the read of initial state was wrong to begin with (in that case any action is an overshoot)
/r/MensRights04/10/22 07:13 PM
51

I guess ... if so, it is a clear overshoot
/r/MensRights04/10/22 06:48 PM
46

Nothing... absolutely nothing. The point the author is making is: the gender gap even favors women if they make choices similar to career oriented men. He suggested the there is a parenting gap instead of a gender gap. (Men who stay home and take care of kinds are also on the low end of the deal)
/r/MensRights04/10/22 06:40 PM
17

It is more complicated than that
/r/MensRights04/10/22 06:29 PM
27

O did not get any paywall from where I am. Besides ... the guy published the same statement in a recent book (The boys crisis). So he is doubling down on the same issue. I also don't see how the figures would be that different considering the overall direction of the society
/r/MensRights04/10/22 06:25 PM
0

I thought u are done... are u?
/r/MensRights04/10/22 06:07 PM
1

If course you are... you have nothing to say.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 05:56 PM
0

I'm sorry for assuming. The argument is current though
/r/MensRights04/10/22 05:43 PM
0

No Lady, you are avoiding the topic to push your own narrative
/r/MensRights04/10/22 05:33 PM
-1

No... I'm taking on you, because you are bullshiting the discussion. Stop it.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 04:36 PM
-1

Which is not the topic of this post...
/r/MensRights04/10/22 03:23 PM
7

That's solid research right here.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 08:25 AM
10

This is not what the paper is about. Their results show that in the last 20 years, women have a much larger chance to become prestigious memberships than men OF SAME QUALIFICATION. The women which did qualify for the groups do belongs to the top 5% in their field (which is a tiny sub-set of ghe General population). By no means these women are oppressed or forced into traditional roles. Still ... they are extremely OVER-REPRESENTED among the new members of those prestigious academic circles. That…
/r/MensRights04/10/22 08:24 AM
2

Sure: Alcohol!! Have you seen how much advertising for Alcohol there is. 🤮 Maybe cars as well.
/r/MensRights01/10/22 04:14 PM
1

Besides... why would a feminist write something basically complaining about women unjustified prejudice against a young boy?
/r/MensRights01/10/22 12:48 PM
3

Both Autors are men
/r/MensRights01/10/22 12:46 PM
6

I agree
/r/MensRights01/10/22 10:35 AM
14

😅👌
/r/MensRights30/09/22 10:36 PM
28

I don't have an issue with "women wanting perfect men". I don't really care and that's not the point here. The point is that your logic is flawed. Repeating your talking point won't make it better.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 09:43 PM
35

How does that differ from "its capitalism!"? It does not. So the "patriarchy part" is not necessary at best. In fact is wrong, because it shifts the focus from the problem (a tiny share of men and women who have everything) and spread it among millions who have nothing (poor men). So... no. She is not even half right
/r/MensRights30/09/22 09:36 PM
2

Not what I meant. I meant you don't need to be nice when people give you shit back. I don't believe everyone deserve my best indefinitely.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 09:31 PM
120

"So how can it be a patriarchy, if it disadvantage men? " I think we all agree that there are oppressed PEOPLE in the world. Most men are in fact oppressed. It might be that most oppressors are men (although you can make the argument they are married, so it would be 50/50). But oppressors are a tiny minority of people.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 07:07 PM
326

"Why should a patriarchy brainwash you to a belief which is clear disadvantage to men? It should not...and it would not if a patriarchy really existed.
/r/MensRights30/09/22 06:47 PM
248

My advice: Be nice at first, but keep it only with those who deserve it. You don't have to put up with nobody's shit.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 11:11 PM
13

The comments section is so toxic 😪
/r/MensRights29/09/22 10:22 PM
1

You know dogs and humans, AS SPECIES, share about 75% of their same DNA, don't you?
/r/MensRights28/09/22 12:29 AM
1

Not blaming anything on testosterone. I'm talking about biological differences between males and females. And how widely such differences can be manifested WITHIN each group. If any feminist use it as talking point, it's because she does not understand statistics. Unfortunately it seems you also don't understand statistics, which is unfortunate. Most men and most women do not commit DV. there is a tiny fraction of INDIVIDUALS who do. Those belongs behind bars, regardless their sex. It is well re…
/r/MensRights28/09/22 12:26 AM
1

Dude ... can you even read? I'm not minimizing the effect of nurture. But it is CLEARLY not the only factor and not even the highest one. You are claiming otherwise, so show the data. If human nurturing was the most relevant factor, why male humans are more prone to agression as THE VERY LARGE MAJORITY of other species?
/r/MensRights27/09/22 10:49 PM
1

Data? Studies? Is that grauer than nature? If so, while male agressiveness is prevalent is the absolute majority of human AND animal groups?
/r/MensRights27/09/22 10:10 PM
1

Men who are raised believing that violence is the way will be more violent while men who are raised to avoid conflict would most likely avoid conflict Can you back this Statement up with any kind of data?
/r/MensRights27/09/22 09:56 PM
3

Let me guess: you don't have much training in statistics, do you?
/r/MensRights27/09/22 09:41 PM
1

It is not... give a bunch of lovely dogs some fresh bovine testicles to eat (tissue full of testo) and you can see they becoming agressive in few minutes. For male humans the issue seems a little more complicated, because test increase status-uncreasing behavior (according to a study published on PNAS vol. 113, #41 in 2016). This might be either pro-social or anti-social behavior. There I still a lot of controversy about this issue. But it seems clear that test regulates agression in males (amon…
/r/MensRights27/09/22 09:38 PM
0

Men as a group score higher in aggressiveness than women as a group. Adding that Men as a group usually exhibit larger variability in traits than women do ( Variability hypothesis) it is plausible that men will be overrepresented among people showing extreme agressive behavior. You can make a similar argument to explain why men are over-represented among extrem successful people (geniuses, business leaders, etc). Besides, women, as a group, usually express agression in more psychological forms (…
/r/MensRights27/09/22 09:29 PM
1

My opinion: At the exact same moment people start to talk on TV and you constantly have to apologize for your behavior, you are not doing your job effectively anymore.
/r/MensRights27/09/22 06:17 AM
2

Please don't get me wrong bro... I really wish the man all the best.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 10:56 PM
18

The 6 figures EXPENDITURE should not be deployed in the first place. And it is going to increase year after year. I know it hurts, but he is not going to simp his way out of this mess.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 10:55 PM
16

Simple solution: stop Tip toeing. Stop simping.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 09:26 PM
1

Btw: The prime Minister of Finland is 34 and has a job where people are supposed to be mature. Pictures of her parties and some of her friend naked on her office are on social media ... which is not really mature behavior if you ask me. But she gets away with it somehow.
/r/MensRights26/09/22 08:34 PM
13

I honestly don't think anyone is "fully mature" (whatever the hell does that mean) until much later in life. I'm 46 and I don't think I am fully mature. Buuuut ... the things are worse than you imagine bro: Young fellows are sent to war NOT because Society sees them as mature, but because Society seems them as EXPENDABLE. Society, by large, doesn't care about young men. Never did. Never will. That's unless you belong to higher social layers. Then at least some powerful people will care about you…
/r/MensRights26/09/22 08:28 PM
1

It is not
/r/MensRights15/09/22 12:43 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter