TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Hesitant_Observer Archive

View 1 posts and 193 comments by Hesitant_Observer on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
8

GeneralHesitant_Observer/r/MensRights10/09/15 11:51 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

One step at a time.
/r/MensRights06/04/17 01:23 PM
2

I only ask if MGTOW is what it claims to be... if so, no. The movement is different in that it has no goals or changes it wants implemented like political lesbianism, or even the black panthers, they just want to go do their own thing. Look more to the red pill and alt-right.
/r/MensRights27/03/17 11:32 PM
3

You may want to look into the "Disposable male." It's evolutionary psychology, and may have the same roots as sexual dimorphism (the reason men and women have physical differences, including brain chemistry.)
/r/MensRights22/11/16 08:51 AM
10

But nobody will give a shit if you cry and suffer. that's the exact point. You will be expected to lift yourself up by your boostraps and learn how to turn that emotion into something positive to benefit others and gain emotional stability and strength in the process. Women think men have emotional issues because they can't express their feelings and it's incorrect. The real case is that being told your feelings matter only really works if the actions fit the words. The most incorrect thing you …
/r/MensRights22/11/16 03:26 AM
7

Genital integrity. Fairness in divorce and child custody proceedings. Reform of the domestic violence model (the duluth model of patriarchal abuse, for instance.) We campaign against the astronomically high suicide rate for men and lack of mental health, or domestic violence services. There are far more women graduating at all levels in college, but extra funding (financial aid received because of genital status) is still exclusively for women. There is also the drastically reduced sentences wom…
/r/MensRights17/10/16 08:53 AM
0

Groping women? Maybe they shouldn't have let him. That was a key phrase when he was describing "coming onto her like a bitch" and still getting denied. sounds real rapey all right.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 11:19 AM
0

Ah, the kind that ignores the "and women let me" part. not going to let them make adult decisions or have any kind of agency i see.
/r/MensRights12/10/16 11:12 AM
3

Gary Johnson.
/r/MensRights06/10/16 11:40 PM
7

Sorry, but opinions are opinions. You don't get to call them facts.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 11:13 AM
3

Hi. You are probably trolling, but why not? I'm latino, havn't seen anyone without "red pill" in their name somewhere talking about trump here. I don't believe in white privilege, and think #blacklivesmatter are idiots. If anything #malelivesmatter, because women are killed so rarely that a white man has a higher chance of being shot than a black woman. No, i don't worry the MRM is white, because i don't see people that way. This might shock you, but even women can campaign for men's rights.
/r/MensRights29/08/16 09:32 AM
2

And here I am asking for laws and all you give me are social inequalities, some of which still benefit women.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 03:38 AM
3

Then women on average need to work longer hours, more dangerous work, more overtime, and less part-time work. There are only laws protecting women's pay. Also, what's your opinion on women never marrying or having children having higher wages than men in the same category? The only laws dealing with street harassment protect women more than men. So which country is wrong, or are they all discriminating against women with ADHD? And women have a right to the burkini, even in France, which already …
/r/MensRights27/08/16 03:25 AM
1

Exactly, don't derail OP, you wanted to talk about the real issues. Now name one.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 03:05 AM
6

Haha, another psycho saying my Penis grants me privilege without evidence while ignoring the very clear-cut privileges you get under law for simply having a vagina. How long until people look at the laws and realize women are benefitted and that men are discriminated against?
/r/MensRights27/08/16 02:29 AM
1

Name a right that men have that you don't. You have the stage, derail if you want, but it's women's equality day, so what law is discriminatory? I can name several that are discriminatory to men or give women privileges and protections under law that men and boys do not get. Put your money where your mouth is.
/r/MensRights27/08/16 02:06 AM
1

Yes, but the self harm doesn't have to be serious, it just has to be reported. That's the point, we count people as attempting suicide even when they did not intend to, or even try to for that matter. It skews the statistic.
/r/MensRights04/08/16 04:43 AM
10

Having a father in your life is better than not having a father in your life... Shocker, i know.
/r/MensRights03/08/16 12:43 PM
2

And then somehow control for the practice of counting all hospitalizations for self harm as attempted suicide.
/r/MensRights01/08/16 02:56 AM
3

It really does miss the point. It's not that women want to be raped, or they would all fall in love with their rapist. It does seem that women are much more likely to have rape fantasies, but in my mind that is a way to exert control. You have a man that is "overpowering" you but you are still the one in control. You have some well reasoned responses, and it's refreshing, have an upvote.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 08:13 PM
2

Clearly you've never married. "She took your house and car? tough shit, you signed up for that when you proposed." She's projecting or can't understand men have feelings other than greed. You don't need to make up an analogy. husbands getting rinsed by someone they loved happens often enough as it is, and would make a better analogy, but then women look like the bad guys.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 08:06 PM
2

Men are not disposable. treating yourself as if you are would be the ultimate form of betrayal for the MRM and humanism in general. Even if you never came back to activism, i hope you read this and keep that in mind.
/r/MensRights14/07/16 11:08 AM
2

Well judging all men and being distrustful of them because of your past is called misandry, so doing that is being a bigot. flipping the script a bit, a man has no obligation to return your sexual favors with an emotional connection, and you just need to accept that. You decide who to have sex with. It is not men's fault as a collective that you have not been happy with your choices. You could definitely try celibacy until someone gives you that emotional connection you are looking for. Fact is,…
/r/MensRights14/07/16 11:01 AM
1

Welcome. Mental well-being is a slippery thing, but thank you for sharing. There are impulses that come from our biology that most just can't combat, but i wish you luck in your journey. You are not lesser because you choose not to participate. if nothing else, it is the harder of the paths. You are choosing your own path rather than being pressured into the easy path. Going your own way is not easy, and becomes even harder as you begin doing and improving things about yourself, for yourself. Th…
/r/MensRights07/07/16 11:59 PM
3

For fending off cro magnon or neanderthals, sure. I think egalitarianism is the only way you're going to get real free choice, for men and women. Gynocentrism is great for defending ourselves as a species, and there is plenty of evidence pointing to the fact that we may have just outbred our competing "cave men" through protecting the women first. If a woman doesn't want to be held liable for crimes or debt, like the 1800's they gave up their other rights like legal contracts or property ownersh…
/r/MensRights06/07/16 11:45 AM
1

It might literally being a case of knowing no means no and never getting a no. Pure speculation because it says "against her will" but is that by the "no means no" standard, or the "yes means yes" standard? even socially unaware people know that crying is a big nonverbal cue, maybe that's when he actually realized he fucked up, she didn't really like him, and he was totally off-mark. speculation, but it's the only thing that makes sense, really..
/r/MensRights30/06/16 02:41 AM
7

my birth (circumcision)...my childhood (my female babysitter abused me)... schooling (raped by both a man and a woman)... and my job where i try to give abused / neglected children more of a childhood than i ever got. (you'd think working with kids it would be more of a social thing but it's not, there are different requirements based on gender.) Now then, since you're not here to debate, what are you here for?
/r/MensRights24/06/16 09:47 AM
2

It's just a useless piece of skin, man-up and stop complaining already!
/r/MensRights17/06/16 03:18 AM
1

He also doesn't give a damn about circumcision, one of the rights most commonly advacated for by MRA's. I really think he is more of a free-speech advocate than anything.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 03:12 AM
2

That's exactly what i was looking for, thank you. These are the same things i was hoping for too. The initial article wasn't great on details.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 04:46 AM
3

Does anyone know where i can find the actual rules proposed? It better have something more substantial than the treatment of transgendered peoples. Working in this field, I have personally seen the cases on top of seeing the numbers. It is true that more rape in prison is committed by guards, and it is also true that a large majority of those cases in particular being committed by female staff. They say it in the article, but i want to see what they are doing about it. "You can tell staff until …
/r/MensRights15/06/16 02:36 AM
1

You mean like the various statutes around the country that prevent women from being prosecuted for false accusations because women "wouldn't seek justice?" So just getting kicked out of college and not taken off of the streets makes women safer.. going to have to remember that. I was under the impression that might only make someone vengeful and put the victim at more risk.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 03:37 AM
2

Because when you let campus courts decide sexual assault cases, the (proven) rapists still get no jail time. In their minds it must be everyone else's fault, and not at all because they are having these "trials" outside a court of law. Brock Turner got 6 months more than he would've gotten in a campus court. It's a case where feminists actually benefit financially from convicted rapists not being put in jail.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 03:33 AM
1

Yes.. Quite simply, yes. Not just adult women, but psychopaths, being the distinction.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 04:50 AM
1

He wasn't the only one that read it that way, and I've had that argument against me before. "well if it's ONLY decreasing sexual pleasure, what's the big deal?" Thanks for clarifying.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 01:56 AM
2

It's not even about the victims either, because a girl will get just as shafted for going after a female abuser as boys will. Ironically that is the easiest way i found to bring awareness to it. People by default don't care about the boys, but if a girl is victimized and the woman walks out of the courtroom free and smiling....
/r/MensRights09/06/16 11:30 AM
1

Why does being gay make you different from everyone else?
/r/MensRights09/06/16 09:57 AM
2

This may interest you People saying go to the doctor are potentially the most right, just in case. However, olive oil to help retract it and good ol' fashoined soap has been a treatment as far back as ancient rome, and the mechanics involved havn't changed much. We've even come up with more effective and therapeutic lubricants. Worst case scenario... do not be afraid to go to a doctor, any shame you feel talking to one about it would be nothing compared to trying to explain to a lover that your …
/r/MensRights08/06/16 08:42 AM
3

Except we didn't learn about the atrocities against the jews until the fighting was all but done. We didn't fight the war for them.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 12:10 AM
17

"why deprive them?" well to be honest, because they choose to do that themselves. You are not depriving them of exercise, they are doing that themselves because not being around the opposite gender trumps their want to go swimming.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 12:06 AM
4

As a rape victim, I've seen this first-hand. It comes with the territory of gynocentrism. Men's value is commonly linked with how valued they are to women. This comes across as power, or sexual prowess. When women are seen as the arbiters of sex, and whether or not it happens, any predation against men will be seen as trivial, or the victim's goal. This is why a sexually active man is a stud, and a sexually active woman is a slut. The woman is not valuing her sexuality and is seen as giving it a…
/r/MensRights03/06/16 06:45 AM
2

And these are the exact scenarios they are training for. "Shit has gone south, now deal with it" is a very common teaching method.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 07:26 PM
3

It sounds pessimistic, but i have to agree. The only thing i've had any success with is pushing them down their line of thinking. challenge them not to prove you wrong, but to prove their case. It doesn't always work, but I've found people are far more likely to pick up on their mistakes if they find it out themselves. They are religious people, and like other religious people most would rather not even try to convince them they are wrong. the best method seems to be to get them to question thei…
/r/MensRights17/05/16 10:55 AM
2

"it's okay to put yourself first".. You walk the kite, the kite doesn't walk you
/r/MensRights17/05/16 02:00 AM
1

more from a few thousand years ago but same concept. Our society and understanding exploded far faster than our physical selves could. We still have "caveman" instincts. Our thoughts are affected by our hormonal levels, we are fallible, selfish, and many other things we've brought from our tribal past, like the higher value placed on women, or the physiological response when seeing a woman hurt. like i said earlier, it's your brain making you think things before you can even look at it in your h…
/r/MensRights17/05/16 01:03 AM
1

Or... and bear with me here.. Or testosterone level is the greatest indicator of risk-taking behavior we have yet to find, and will be found in higher amounts in risk takers regardless of sex.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 12:55 AM
2

Yes.... EVERY risk that women go through, and have gone through, has been minimized to the best of humankind's ability. Even now that life is significantly safer and birth almost never kills the mother, it's still them men that are more risk-taking. Even just two young people trying to hook up, the woman is less likely to be the aggressive pursuer. If something is not life-threatening, it can still take risk assessment, and women are more likely to keep it as safe as possible. And the safer ever…
/r/MensRights17/05/16 12:51 AM
1

Yes, but that's my point. At this stage it is really just purging the remnants of "nervous excitation theory" that are still being practiced today. Even our roman and ancestors realized the value of olive oil and soap for treating and preventing phimosis. Feminism isn't really seen as pushing for more circumcision even if they are mum on boys affected by it. Men's rights isn't about fighting feminism. however if a feminist opposes men's rights or tries to misrepresent them.. well, then Jonnyluck…
/r/MensRights16/05/16 11:49 PM
2

Is it necessary to fight feminism to end circumcision, for example? why, or why not?
/r/MensRights16/05/16 10:46 PM
2

They will most likely be commended on how stoic, mentally stable, or "tough" they are
/r/MensRights13/05/16 04:50 AM
1

Statute of limitations.. There is only so much that can be done. It would be just as accurate to say "former Speaker of the House received mandatory sex offender education after conviction for embezzlement." Sauce
/r/MensRights05/05/16 12:50 PM
2

This is true. Airsoft is a booming trend lately, and they have some of the most realistic looking ones. In a place like Idaho you won't have a problem, but that changes if you live in Chicago, for example.
/r/MensRights05/05/16 02:32 AM
1

Not according to the rest of the government... figures produced by the Bureau of Justice Statistics found that sexual abuse rates in juvenile detention were as high as 9.5 per cent in 2011 to 2012. In the same year, four per cent of state and federal prisoners and 3.2 per cent of all people in jail surveyed said they had been a victim.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 08:43 AM
17

It's insane that she thinks in any way maternity leave ends up being "me-time.." yeah... pretty delusional. It seemed that parenthood was the only path that provided a modicum of flexibility. There’s something about saying “I need to go pick up my child” as a reason to leave the office on time that has far more gravitas than, say, “My best friend just got ghosted by her OkCupid date and needs a margarita.” And here we see the priorities.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 04:48 AM
1

Glad to hear it. I'm tired of hearing men are stronger and women are weaker (usually from women, mind you) when i would much rather have leaner, less vulnerable and more stable muscles. I have to work harder to get "feminine" muscles just like women have to work harder to get "masculine" muscles.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 10:05 PM
2

may want to edit it to say "raped" children... just sayin'
/r/MensRights24/04/16 09:24 PM
3

"is it a right?" good question actually. Until it's determined illegal, no. However women have that right and men don't. Nobody that questions whether you have a right to a foreskin seems to question whether women have a right to their clitoral hood or their vulva.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 09:23 PM
1

yes, they are the same type of muscle fibers, but depending on your hormones will either be denser and more likely to tear, or leaner and more likely to stretch. those two muscles have different lift potential, even if they are the same size. This is why "women can put on just as much muscle on men" that's not the comparison, is it? You're talking about functional strength. one is better at explosiveness and pure force, the other is better at long term stability, flexibility, and stabilization. …
/r/MensRights24/04/16 09:18 PM
1

yes, weaker than "most" men, however can be much stronger than even a bigger woman. strength is subjective, but that doesn't mean biological processes take a back seat.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 09:06 PM
1

They referenced the designer when they were talking about our hunter/gatherer past. You may call it semantics, but that is what created sexual dimorphism.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:59 PM
4

It's a biological thing.People have differing biology, so there are some overlaps. In the end, i believe hormones are the biggest factor. muscles fed primarily testosterone have more explosive strength, increased protein synthesis, denser muscle fiber. Muscles fed primarily estrogen causes more elasticity, decreased "threat of tearing" and slower recovery when tears do happen (you have to cause some tearing to build mass.) It takes more force to lift something if your muscles are more "stretchy"…
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:54 PM
4

Both, i'd say. Stoicism and mental stability are learned, not biological. You don't get callouses without a bit of pain. It's very much like the spartans. Everyone wanted to be as strong and powerful as spartan warriors, but nobody wanted to deal with the horrors they had to go through to get there.
/r/MensRights22/04/16 06:33 AM
7

This made me chuckle.. "Black bodies" is the newest one.
/r/MensRights18/04/16 11:59 PM
5

Thanks sweetie.
/r/MensRights13/04/16 11:42 AM
1

I see no real problem here, it's a good message. Granted, the "a violent crime happens every 26 seconds" bit probably has men as the majority of victims if they cared to look, but they want to target women for their defense products and that is their prerogative. Men prefer guns or knives to the "less than lethal" weapons anyway.
/r/MensRights23/03/16 03:32 AM
1

So doesn't that mean you should keep your anti-communist politics to yourself? or does that only apply to people who you think are guilty of "wrong-think?"
/r/MensRights22/03/16 08:59 AM
0

I'm sorry that people as a whole don't agree with your philosophy, but why do you have to take it out on me? I'm just pointing out why people react the way you described. downvoting me isn't going to change that, and only makes me not want to support you even though i believe the same thing.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 10:34 AM
0

You're never going to stop people from wishing harm on the ~10% of the world that end up being psychopaths. I get where you are coming from, and i agree, it's just going to beget more violence. however, people heard he diddled with kids.. so because of that,even hardened criminals want him hurt, and people see it as him lying in the bed he's made. You don't have to get sentenced to death to die in prison, people know that, and he has a long sentence left to go.
/r/MensRights17/03/16 01:44 AM
1

"Still, the attempted sexual assault charge will result in 10 years intensive supervised probation to be served after Bardos serves her prison sentence on the child abuse charge." so probation for the sex assault charge and prison for the child abuse charge. notice they dropped 2 sexual assault charges and the sentence only dropped 2-10 years.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 11:53 AM
1

Maybe this is the only charge that will get jail-time to stick, rather than 10 years probation.
/r/MensRights16/03/16 01:03 AM
1

No... Just like with everyone else, teach people not to accept or justify abuse for any reason. Teach everyone to defend themselves from the psychotic minority that you can't teach not to harm. They aren't going anywhere anytime soon.
/r/MensRights09/03/16 05:35 AM
3

I'm more curious if it is all down to stoicism and not allowing yourself to feel "hostile, depressed, and angry." I'm curious what the results would be if you removed self reporting entirely and went solely based on detectable effects.
/r/MensRights08/03/16 01:53 AM
7

Easy.. since women can't actually be framed as agents, they must be framed as objects. Since she shouldn't be expected to control her own sleep schedule, it is up to us big strong men to make sure they are getting enough sleep. You can't force them to go to bed, but you can "let them sleep in."
/r/MensRights08/03/16 01:41 AM
1

If it is status quo to keep men away from children on the same airline, (seen by most as a minor issue) how is that not precedent? If it's a minor issue for men then it is a minor issue for women, correct?
/r/MensRights29/02/16 09:46 PM
1

Here is a good starting point.. http://ojp.gov/reviewpanel/pdfs/prea_finalreport_2012.pdf
/r/MensRights24/02/16 10:41 AM
5

Manspreading. Clearly all the other answers in this thread are just promoting the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 08:19 PM
2

They play zero-sum games. there is never an in-between. something is either all their fault, or all someone else's fault. If you are not a feminist, clearly you are an MRA. If you don't support a women to get into stem fields or to become legislators (not by opposing them, but just by not promoting them) then clearly you want them all in the kitchen.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 07:53 PM
3

Why not just measure the data you already have in an honest way? yeah, that breaks the narrative.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 09:29 AM
1

18 - Why are you always trying to prove your masculinity to me? - Because that is the instinct. that is what we are taught (by women, mind you) that masculinity is what most women are looking for. Go jump on facebook and report back on how many women are making comments about what is a "real man." are the demands in-line with chivalry? then that is exactly what you are asking for. 19 - Why is it your first instinct to doubt when a woman has been sexually violated or raped? - no, you don't get to…
/r/MensRights27/01/16 04:12 AM
1

I'll take a crack at it.... 1 -How does it feel to be the same sex as Donald trump? -Not very different from being the same sex as Dr. Martin Luther King JR, thanks for asking. *2 -Why do you hate Rom-coms? * -I hate "ROM-COMS" because they tend to have very 2 dimensional characters that try to cram every "feminine" trope they can into the movie to boost sales. Do i have to watch them? 3 - Why do you guys make women sit around and talk about men in movies when y'all easily just sit around and ta…
/r/MensRights27/01/16 04:12 AM
2

This is how i see it. The status quo is to joke about it, even in articles on trials like this. If the situation has to be so extreme for people to actually be offended, good, some people need to see that about themselves. This is coming from someone who went through sexual abuse, it needs to be talked about.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 12:46 AM
41

You're damn right he's not guilty. Glad to see a bit of sanity.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 03:35 PM
1

No, some of them alienate me because i treat them like people and not snowflakes. I don't really know what you are talking about because the most empowered women I've ever met are not feminist, they tend to think for themselves unlike the perpetual victims you are trying to lump them in with. If women alienate me for advocating genital integrity or legal equality, then they can go fuck themselves, i have better things to think about.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 01:10 AM
2

Well that is the quandary isn't it? On one hand you are hammered over and over with the social construct argument, saying that your identity has nothing to do with your genitals, and on the other hand have the argument from those with gender dysphoria is that they want the outside to match how they feel on the inside. They seem like opposing viewpoints. If social-constructivism were so absolute, i feel that hormone treatment therapy wouldn't have the effect it does. In my mind, the truth probabl…
/r/MensRights14/01/16 09:04 AM
0

He really didn't say anything that mean to you.. He asked your opinion on it. Your sexual organs don't matter in the context of your views of OTHER people who did exactly what they wrote. Suicides are the reason that Johns Hopkins stopped conducting gender reassignment surgery in the first place. they wouldn't do that if it were just the result of bullying. I'm curious too. How much do you feel someone has to want to transition to be "serious" about it? Do you ever think you could change your mi…
/r/MensRights02/01/16 03:07 AM
2

Well, i did find feminist sites, so yes. Lots of rape culture in those
/r/MensRights31/12/15 09:53 AM
3

You know, what's really weird is that i googled "pro-rape books" and the most popular hits were feminist websites / books.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 07:43 AM
1

It would be more accurate to try to compare removal of the clitoral hood with the removal of the foreskin. they are very similar parts with similar function, and when removed cause similar effects. (loss of sensitivity, kerratinization, excess scar tissue, etc) To me, the main point is that it shouldn't still be legal to force on children, right? don't just ban it for one gender because people will always see a mutilated girl as having it worse. Please keep looking into reproductive anatomy, it …
/r/MensRights31/12/15 07:36 AM
2

Women are the constant, men are the variable. There are far more stupid drunk men than women as well. having the geniuses is a double-edged sword.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 07:18 AM
1

You seem very opinionated, and yet still came here for an outside perspective. I can appreciate that. What makes you think it is your duty to empower (in your opinion) a struggling woman? What makes you think that even if you could, you are not just providing this same person with a crutch. People will fail. Thinking someone can be strong that has never had to fail, and empowered themselves because of it, is self defeating. Feminism used to produce strong women. They knew that if you want someth…
/r/MensRights31/12/15 07:14 AM
4

Clearly the only answer is to inprove the ingredients on men's products so they are slightly more expensive too. Now how do you convince the women shoppers that say "but women have different needs" from improving women's products again?
/r/MensRights24/12/15 03:17 AM
8

By definition, they aren't counted the same way. It has been shown that women "attempt suicide" far more than males, but at a lower success rate. These numbers make sense because a successful suicide can only be counted once, while someone can have 3 or more suicide attempts a week. Add to this that the statistics take "self-harm" (cutting, for instance) as a suicide attempt even if the wounds are superficial. Similar statistical issues are all over the US. for instance, a suicide by gun counts …
/r/MensRights18/12/15 12:09 AM
3

Just saw this on my facebook feed. I told her to "man up"
/r/MensRights10/12/15 02:16 AM
1

I suppose the accusation that one had killed their kid, could do it.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 02:55 AM
1

His side of the story.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 11:56 AM
1

yes for women, yes for men. does that make me an MRA? no, i'm egalitarian.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 02:52 AM
1

higher than gay and lower than lesbian, going from the last numbers I read.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 02:45 AM
1

Men. Amirite ladies?
/r/MensRights06/11/15 02:37 AM
1

Not many things get a whole season devoted to them. That in itself is pretty interesting..
/r/MensRights22/10/15 10:47 PM
4

not entirely. here in the states there are many that are charged with "unlawful restraint" for things as simple as defensively grabbing an arm when the woman is openly hitting.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 10:25 AM
3

A feral child is a human child who has lived away from human contact from a very young age, and has little or no experience of human care, loving or social behavior, and, crucially, of human language. Feral children are confined by humans (often parents), brought up by animals, or live in the wild in isolation.
/r/MensRights10/10/15 05:39 AM
6

First of all, as someone running a shelter, thank you for your service. Two questions; do you focus more on adults, or the children? And have you ever had a situation in which you've worked with "feral children?"
/r/MensRights10/10/15 02:55 AM
1

No, i conceded that point. It's not an indicator, it's a factor, just like striking a child is not an indicator (as not all striking is abusive) just like not all financial control is abusive. that is why i tried to contextualize what i mean by control with the word domination. if you want to keep arguing semantics, fine, you already set me up as a strawman in your mind, have at it.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 04:58 AM
1

And not everyone that strikes their child is an abuser. You obviously don't like the word indicator, so striking your child or financial domination is a factor then. Combine that factor with other factors and you get indicators. You are claiming over and over it's possible for the abused to have financial control, can you give me an example, or are you doing the same thing you are accusing me of? For someone that talks about fallacies and strawmen, you say "by your logic" a lot.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 04:32 AM
1

I asked you a question. it's not a fallacy, its not trying to prove a point, it's categorically not an argument. yes, controlling the finances is an indicator of abuse (if that power is obviously being abused) i'll put that caveat for you since you are really, really literal. now combine that indicator with a few others, like i don't know...using the children as a shield or weapon, physical abuse, threats, etc and you can say that the relationship is abusive. I'm not arguing that controlling fin…
/r/MensRights09/10/15 03:53 AM
2

Sounds about right, haha. Good luck out there.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 02:43 AM
0

It is an indicator. Assert that it's not, fine, but abusers often do control the finances. "and it would be nice if people recognized it could be used by women." I was agreeing, and trying to back up your statement. No, abusers don't all control the finances, it would just be harder to find one that doesn't, than one that does. It can't be predictive, we are agreeing there, i don't get why you seem so defensive. Using the children is more of a sign of abuse, in all cases. Do you think i'm trying…
/r/MensRights09/10/15 02:08 AM
3

That doesn't include legally mandated training, like sexual assault prevention, that commands do in-person, but it does get rid of the check-the-block online modules sailors detest. Sure, in that you will have to answer these questions in person now.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 01:58 AM
1

It's that it can be an indicator, and it would be nice if people recognized it could be used by women. It's really a case of "not every person that controls the finances is an abuser, but every abuser controls the finances."
/r/MensRights09/10/15 01:51 AM
1

well at least she's honest, even if she doesn't know she's deluded.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 01:52 AM
2

The bill would prohibit an employer from prohibiting an employee from disclosing the employee’s own wages, discussing the wages of others, inquiring about another employee’s wages, or aiding or encouraging any other employee to exercise his or her rights under these provisions. http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160SB358 lolz.
/r/MensRights07/10/15 01:45 AM
1

I'd welcome it.. If you thought there was a backlash against PC culture before... Let them try that.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 11:50 AM
7

Is there a reason trans men should be treated differently than cis men? Are they not both men? your role is whatever you want it to be. whether you want to go your own way, try to pick up chicks, or help campaign for the legal rights for men. You have no role other than the one you decide to make for yourself.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 11:46 AM
6

Well, it was probably a long night.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 08:26 AM
2

Leading many women to not even try. They then use this exact cause/effect to perpetuate more feminism, spreading the propaganda. Either it is ingenious, or a sign of incompetence.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 01:02 AM
1

Because the problem is coming out of the colleges. seems like an accurate representation.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 10:55 AM
3

well that depends on how he plans on lowering the gap. if he tries to cut the male wages instead of getting more popularity to the female side, it absolutely is oppression.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 10:59 AM
3

well, how the is it sexist to women? Look, i'm sorry that female sports tend to not be watched as much as men's, i'm really sorry. But what would you suggest, force people to watch female sports?
/r/MensRights17/09/15 08:46 AM
1

well, we are still trying to catch u to communism, but maybe one day.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 12:55 AM
2

I believe this may have an effect with gender relations as well, for both men and women. What do you guys think?
/r/MensRights10/09/15 11:52 PM
2

..or genuinely curious.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 01:02 AM
1

MGTOW with MRA leanings/policies here, and i'm in full agreement
/r/MensRights08/09/15 01:01 AM
7

They are, but only when it comes to team woman.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 11:45 AM
3

And here we see why Miss Piggy is a feminist icon.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 03:18 AM
1

Adam sandler @ 1:08
/r/MensRights02/09/15 01:25 AM
3

sorry to say nick, you seem very passionate, but you come accross as too aggressive. keep in mind that these people have been exposed to this their whole lives, and even recently had it reinforced with the "consent class" thing you guys had to do. I totally understand where you are coming from because i have SEEN the data. I agree with the essential points, but you seem to speak as if the other people should be aware of the things you are talking about. It's just not so. Just like the video you …
/r/MensRights27/08/15 08:47 AM
1

Yes, it would indirectly lower rates of penile cancer, throat cancer, and genital warts.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 11:14 PM
0

Yes it did. pretending the government didn't Pander to women since before it could even buy their vote, doesn't change that it happened prohibition fore example, which was mostly supported by women. Because those lazy men can't make the right choices for themselves, women demanded that the law be changed, and it was. How many men do you think got to actually vote on that issue? I think you're talking out of your ass and don't understand gynocentrism. goodbye.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 04:02 PM
0

Riight.. i was trying to suggest the first 2/3rds of that response. no argument whatsoever, but then you contradict yourself by blaming it on suffrage again. Gynocentrism can absolutely be blamed for causing the government to take the actions that would in your mind label them as "big government." especially because it came first. I can't follow your logic, sorry
/r/MensRights15/08/15 07:38 AM
4

Went down an eerily similar road as a bi man. Almost to a T, exact. You start to realize that they indirectly cause every little thing their narrative fights against within their own mind, thus justifying itself. Thank you for sharing, and welcome.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 06:58 AM
1

Wow... You skipped straight over the hundreds of thousands of year that we sheltered and protected females. you know, when the women and children clustered in the center with men guarding the perimeter? Please explain sexual dimorphism without gynocentrism. Please explain how you believe our predecessors behaved before the invention of law, or even democracy. sounds like you got it backwards to me...
/r/MensRights14/08/15 11:32 AM
1

Which came first?
/r/MensRights14/08/15 05:45 AM
2

not by much. Here is Australia and the UK Even considering women have a slightly higher percentage of poisonings than hangings, men still had a higher body count in the same category.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 02:28 AM
1

But then it needs to be explained why this persists in the areas without guns. why is the male rate still higher when both women and men use the same methods? isn't that implying that women are just worse at killing themselves, or do you think there might be a more logical reason?
/r/MensRights10/08/15 03:06 PM
1

Only when the definition of "suicide attempt" includes any self-harm behavior whether or not the individual meant to try to kill themselves. This seems disingenuous.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 10:43 AM
2

It's okay, she's just ignorant of the statistics.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 11:44 AM
1

I disagree. I really don't see much hate out of here. I report when i do. I also confront bad arguments, conspiracy theories, or baiting. I'd ask you to provide evidence that it's a hate-filled space, but like all the other people that claim that, you won't. Don't bother replying, i won't read it.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 06:37 AM
3

And that's exactly how most men's experience with feminism is. Nothing I said was directed at women, or even feminism, but you immediately assume about me the things you assume about other MRA's. Do you not see how that just promotes the idea that no matter what we say, we will be seen as woman haters? It makes people despise those twisting their words even more, get it?
/r/MensRights23/07/15 05:49 AM
8

what group am i blaming for my problems? and what makes you think i feel superior to anything? are you projecting?
/r/MensRights23/07/15 03:29 AM
7

Rather than being a "hacktivist," i go to work in a treatment facility for boys at risk. I routinely get to interact with children picked up in SWAT raids in piles of drugs, or locked in cages and sexually abused. I have dealt with broken minds, suicide attempts and feral children that will never be able to communicate in sentences normal people can understand. And the boys never stop filtering in. My contribution is that i've treated hundreds of traumatized boys like human beings, not like they…
/r/MensRights23/07/15 01:56 AM
1

I can understand how you would think this takes away credibility or harms the MRM's image, but it's how i got here, because of feminists. Most neutral people are not willing to immediately believe an argument like "The men's rights "trolls" do nothing but victim blame and try to let rapists go free. That's not the kind of accusation you just accept without trying to see it for yourself. It took ~an hour of googling and reading posts and i could see they were talking shite. Regardless, awareness …
/r/MensRights22/07/15 01:57 PM
90

Mad respect for the woman trying to defend us from these narcissists. Well done.
/r/MensRights11/07/15 02:38 AM
1

So would you agree that just having a public apology would go a long way? "Look, the cops had to grovel, i didn't do anything."
/r/MensRights10/07/15 02:04 AM
2

Exactly. This is one of the worst situations to shift the burden of proof on. You just can't prove innocence in a situation like sex and have it be able to stand up to the courts. the verdict is given based on the accusers consent, something without evidence, that can be revoked at any time even if there were.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 01:25 AM
2

And you know they smooshed the gay/lesbian statistic on that. gay couples have less DV than hetero couples, and significantly less than lesbian couples, but i see how it could even out when you try to present it so disingenuously.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 04:33 AM
10

what makes you think any job done by a human can't be replaced with automation?
/r/MensRights16/06/15 12:45 PM
1

I wish i could debate this, but it really is too true. That issue is great for showing women that when they have special status, and there is no man to blame it on, things get messy.
/r/MensRights16/06/15 05:09 AM
5

How long before they realize that this is primarily done by women? any takers?
/r/MensRights16/06/15 04:52 AM
3

This is after a woman has deemed you "worthy" of consent, of course.
/r/MensRights30/05/15 07:13 AM
2

Not really, i'm not throwing blind accusations around at all, either. "I'm a worthless piece of shit for doing it." doing what? i didn't discriminate about your weight, race, sexuality, or gender identity. you are the one wanting discrimination by trying to separate yourself from everyone else and demanding that EVERYONE ELSE sees fat people (as a separate class) positively, rather than on individual merit. If you tell me i can't talk about negative health effects of being fat without it being d…
/r/MensRights30/05/15 07:06 AM
0

I was referencing the "anti-gay, anti-black discrimination." whatever... you have no reading comprehension. You weren't born fat, idiot. It's not discrimination for calling you an idiot for thinking that. Get over yourself and learn how biology works
/r/MensRights30/05/15 01:00 AM
2

You would if it was culturally acceptable to mutilate them at birth. we absolutely would, that is the point
/r/MensRights30/05/15 12:54 AM
1

What discrimination are you even on about. i see useful tips from people... what are you on about?
/r/MensRights29/05/15 03:31 PM
8

"But frankly, men are a majority of victims of public sphere violence." she totally did point it out.
/r/MensRights25/05/15 04:02 PM
1

I'm a centrist since you asked, but why is this an issue for Men's rights?
/r/MensRights17/05/15 05:32 AM
4

You might even say that it is forming some sort of backlash.. However, feminist sources will just say we hate women. Anyway, thanks for sharing
/r/MensRights15/05/15 10:28 AM
1

you need feminism for all of these first world problems you have. i understand dear, it's okay.
/r/MensRights13/05/15 12:50 PM
-1

sure, no PUA's or MGTOW's have anyone speaking out on circumcision or familial rights things, they are all uniform
/r/MensRights06/05/15 12:23 AM
19

big question. former feminist, current egalitarian here. There is a large section of the population that has simply gotten fed up with third wave feminism, to address the "woman-haters" and some genuinely are. most are fed up with the victimhood that all women are painted with by all of the feminists themselves. they are fed up with first world problems that you have to get over if you wanted to be treated as an equal in society. no coddling, no special priveledge, no protected status. all most …
/r/MensRights05/05/15 05:16 PM
0

Fast-forward to the early 20th century and this began to change. When it did, starting just before the 1920s, pink was deemed by many guides to be more appropriate for boys and blue for girls, although this wasn’t even remotely as popular as the “pink is for girls, blue is for boys” association that exists today; many people completely ignored the gender recommendations altogether. source
/r/MensRights04/05/15 02:16 AM
3

and if someone were to show that children only a day old have a preference in looking at a mechanical object (masuculine) or at a human face (feminine) and then correlated that with in vitro testosterone levels, would you accept that maybe it's the hormones effects on the brain? yes, this could even pertain to color and toy preference. Why not biology AND socialization?
/r/MensRights03/05/15 05:18 PM
2

unfortunately, my "follow up" involved so much stress and self hatred it did more harm than good. "you are likely to be a perpetrator of this in the future now" has profound effects on a kid. why would i ever want to put anyone through that..? i've struggled with relationships, trust, and trying to stay optimistic about people. when, from a young age, you see how easily an abuser can don a smile of innocence and still be so vile as to get her own son involved as well... specific, i know, but it …
/r/MensRights30/04/15 03:35 AM
3

or it could be that the accused (regardless of sex) is the one that is innocent until proven guilty. this is a terrible example as well because rape accusations are plastered in the media as if true as soon as the accusation is made. a victim is not "guilty" for making a claim, or even an outlandish accusation (which will likely be investigated) they are guilty if it is a lie.
/r/MensRights30/04/15 03:12 AM
3

i believe it does also come down to the biological imperative. sluts are competition. this is why both genders slut shame, but tend to do it to their own gender.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 07:35 PM
1

lawyer up, record everything. regardless of your laws, that is the safest starting point.
/r/MensRights28/04/15 07:13 PM
3

do men "make a scene" when they attempt suicide (on average?) or do they quietly try again? could this possibly skew results? there is that belief, not saying it doesn't exist, but that's not the only reason. women can be just as strong, and much stronger than men, but it does take more muscle mass for the same force. there are upsides as well, like increased pain tolerance, less prone to injury etc. one of the bigger problems is the men's natural reaction. say a man/woman soldier are shot in th…
/r/MensRights24/04/15 10:14 AM
3

I supported it. i just wanted to make sense of my experiences and help others not have to live through those things. child abuse, molestation, 2 false rape accusations (i brought the case to the police while they brought it to their friends, charges dropped, doesn't matter, became pariah) From day 1 it was all about how men caused everything. it was men's fault for the abuse i suffered at the hands of a woman. and men's fault that she let her son molest me, men's fault that my mother couldn't ma…
/r/MensRights24/04/15 08:51 AM
1

"Adversity makes men, prosperity makes monsters"-Victor Hugo
/r/MensRights15/04/15 04:40 AM
1

no.... -evolution
/r/MensRights10/04/15 12:41 PM
2

Fem
/r/MensRights10/04/15 08:29 AM
2

easy now, we aren't dealing with men. that's a good way to get whipped, beaten, castrated, and THEN killed
/r/MensRights11/02/15 10:18 AM
1

Due to the glans being an internal organ, it is lubricated and protected by similar structures. Removal of said structure decreases lubrication significantly. Production of lysozymes, cytokines, and langerin all kill pathogens) stop. There is then karatinization of the glans, loss of sensation, loss of pleasure from both sex and masturbation. There is also the process itself and effects our current medical procedure, but I believe we need more study on it before I comment on that aspect. Physiol…
/r/MensRights02/02/15 10:56 PM
1

Only in reference to childishness, incompetence, or brutishness. It's actually pretty common
/r/MensRights02/02/15 10:22 PM
2

consider this as well.. it's known that one of, if not the most, common ways to attempt suicide is the handful of pills method which has a pretty poor success rate. nobody ants to hear it, but its true that hen a man truly gets fed up they just do it. they don't try to draw attention to it, they just gulp. they are far less likely to get attention because of it, even if they fail. ie, even the attempt wouldn't be noted. as opposed to women who make it public, and get recorded when they fail
/r/MensRights31/01/15 03:39 AM
1

part of this is because guns can genuinely protect the people you care about when used responsibly, and a "suicide hood" is ridiculously simple, cheap, and painless. you can take away guns, sure, but you can not take away plastic bags.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 03:27 AM
1

indeed, accepting feminism into your heart is the only way to absolve you of your raping ways..
/r/MensRights31/01/15 02:59 AM
3

it's actually less clean and removes the part of the penis that lubricates the glans and produces lysozymes, cytokynes, and langerin. (these things kill pathogens) edit:and correct me if im wrong, but if you wanted to equate them anatomically isn't removing the foreskin the exact same as removing the clitoral hood?
/r/MensRights29/01/15 12:28 PM
3

(obviously there are issues like phimosis or personal preference, which you are fully entitled to, just like a woman is to a clitorectomy) we can't convince americans to stop cutting on a boys genitals as a rule rather than the exception, even if it can be proven there is no medical need. and this is in a society where even stage-IV female circumcision (least destructive) is a crime against humanity. if that is the mentality, how the hell do you think you could ever fix any of the things "that f…
/r/MensRights16/01/15 08:43 AM
-1

what field? in some fields it is similar to why some people can be "overqualified" for a position..there is a high chance that they will just not stick with the job, lose interest (or gain a different one) there is also the factor of liability, maternal responsibilities, and yes, it is good that society has some fantastic legal protections for women, but it is honestly better for the company to hire someone who a court would take less seriously if they were ever sued by this same employee. so ye…
/r/MensRights16/01/15 07:22 AM
2

"if you want to talk about the wage gap, then explain this to me... the most common, highest paying jobs have the highest mortality rate, on average. risking your life is worth more money than working a cubicle job, correct?" usually conversations like this end in " stop blaming men for women not being interested enough (as a whole) to equalize the numbers in every profession across the board." hell, it's apparently misogyny to point out that women who are interested in..let's say the medical fi…
/r/MensRights16/01/15 06:57 AM
2

they also cannot sell those assets from under the woman. this is the point, it's normally lost. the men own it in name only and gain only the liability/debt. this would be true if a woman were to own/bring to marriage a shop, for example. her husband accepts liability for that shop, and is expected to upkeep it, but the woman has the access to the income. she could legally decide to withhold all of it from her spouse, or even children (not so much under modern westernized law) people like to cla…
/r/MensRights16/01/15 02:20 AM
1

yep, the troll, and perhaps part of the <8% of the population that are truly soicio/psychopathic
/r/MensRights15/01/15 01:51 AM
1

i think i could agree, and might very well explain why he is a MGTOW and not an MRA. it's just frustrating dealing with the double standards, so i can empathize.
/r/MensRights15/01/15 01:31 AM
2

Not attacking you, but societal norms and the prevalent social pressures don't stop just because you leave the internet. in this way at least he can receive support as well, not just hate. we also live in a society where it's not okay for men to say things like this without very real consequences. so much so, that people have to carefully weigh whether or not they want to use their own name when they post anti-feminst things. this only makes you feel so much more alone when you see it in everyda…
/r/MensRights14/01/15 09:58 PM
12

i want to see the questions. these studies have a tendency to lump "i would, or have, had sex with a woman who was under the influence of alcohol or drugs" into the rape category. this is especially true when they are trying to point out that the study is supposed to differentiate between rape and "sexual coercion." and even taken at face value, only 13% say that they'd rape a woman.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 09:46 PM
1

And you are absolutely spot on
/r/MensRights14/01/15 07:46 PM
3

fantastic read, thank you.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 03:22 AM
1

here, i'm sorry for OP. this is a big question, but is pretty simple once you see it. hating sexism isn't necessarily a bad thing. but what is sexism? it's grown, changed, and ingrained itself as a huge factor for things like marketing, politics, charities. the problem is that we don't all agree on what is sexism, and may never, as a whole. the hating of sexist opinion is just this. their version of sexist just may not match up, but if one party wants to destroy the others ability to speak, rath…
/r/MensRights10/01/15 03:11 AM
1

Unfortunately, society expects you to make that sacrifice. The fact that the unaccompanied minor is not your fault at all shows that mentality. even if the threat were more legitimate and predation was much higher, why is it more of an inconvenience to move the child instead? well...because penis
/r/MensRights27/12/14 04:36 AM
1

Whether or not you can claim your child as a dependent on your tax return is based on a variety of factors including the child's support. In many cases, the custodial parent, the parent who the child lives with, will be the one who can claim the exemption. But, in some cases, the non-custodial parent can claim the child as their dependent, if the requirements are met... The requirements...I think the fact that it DOES affect more men than women, and that it is somehow seen as normal, is precisel…
/r/MensRights25/12/14 01:39 AM
1

she needs to remember that the white knight will stab her in the back the first time it suits him too
/r/MensRights24/12/14 02:38 PM
0

if women were dangerous this would be a major security flaw..or something.. This is why men should not underestimate women.These ones right here get the kid gloves from the (belgian?) secret service on national TV? LOL who would intervene for you?
/r/MensRights24/12/14 02:19 PM
2

This is actually pretty bad. I mean, there are generalizations, but you gave nothing... so look for behaviors that just don't seem like they fit? she wants to use one of her condoms? insists not to use one at all, as "she is on the pill?" How about strange questions that just don't fit well with conversation, such as suddenly taking an interest in medical history? (hint, not STI-wise) Those are the things that i came across, at least. you can't just say things like that though. it's the same as …
/r/MensRights24/12/14 01:57 PM
1

as a man that's been raped...fuck this prick
/r/MensRights24/12/14 12:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter