TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HiggsFieldgoal Archive

View 2 posts and 99 comments by HiggsFieldgoal on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
460

DiscriminationHiggsFieldgoal/r/MensRights30/03/26 04:25 PM
207

discussionHiggsFieldgoal/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/26 03:41 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

“Patriarchy” is a made up word, invented by a bigot. It will mean whatever bigots want it to mean. It deserves no further analysis. That boys are subjected to illegal sexist discrimination, however, is a fact, and we need to do something about it.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/26 03:27 PM
-3

I don’t know. Maybe I just have a personal peeve about people giving themselves a pass for known bad behavior with a fancy name for it. “Oh, I’m borderline personality disorder, so I’m a completely unapologetic nightmare half the time, but you just have to accept that about me”. That’s an exaggerated example, but I generally believe people are responsible for their own behavior… not their feelings, but for their actions. It is a dangerous precedent to give one’s self a pass for behavior that you…
/r/MensRights18/08/26 07:48 AM
1

Well, thanks for not taking my advice the wrong way. Personally, at your age, I was never able to remain happily single for long. If you can, that’s great. I’m sure it beats unhappily single. Good luck.
/r/MensRights18/08/26 07:43 AM
5

Yeah, we just need to have the guts, and I’m a hypocrite, or maybe I’m just working my up to it. My son had a teacher… bubbly rainbows. Not an unpleasant person. My son told me, if a girl speaks in class, she talks to them, and if a boy speaks, she loudly shushes them. And, in regards to homework, she gives good grades for what she likes, and worse grades for stuff she doesn’t like as much, totally subjectively. Rainbow Unicorn? A. Fire breathing dragon? B. Cute story? A. Scary story: B. And I j…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/26 07:34 AM
-10

I don’t know man. THE most important part of a relationship is being considerate… you have some awareness of your your actions are affecting the other person, and you try to not do things that will make them miserable. Are there double-standards? Yes… a plenty. But in this case, it’s not something that is okay when women do it but not okay when men do it. Double standard? Sure. Fair enough. But it’s really just not okay for anyone to do that, because it’s making your attraction to someone a burd…
/r/MensRights18/08/26 07:24 AM
4

Yeah, it’s weird. It is not really that unusual to people’s beliefs to mutate until they’re unrecognizable, but it was still shocking. As a child “love people based on the content of their their character, love people who are different than you, prejudice is wrong, and it me important that women have the same rights as men”… and then, 30 years later: “Prejudice is good again. We call it intersectionality, and you can apply multiple prejudices at the same time, but it’s sort of reversed, because …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/08/26 12:25 AM
21

Yeah, in a way, it is convenient. I had a bit of a crisis with Feminism. I had always thought of myself as a Feminist. Like all people, I am reluctant to admit I am wrong, and prefer the believe I was right all along. So, as I started having interactions with misandrist bigots, calling themselves Feminists, it was tricky. Is this “modern feminism” or “3rd wave feminism”, some sort of distinction I could find to protect the “True Scotsman” from being defamed? But, at this point, it’s better and e…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/26 08:03 PM
7

I’m sort of new to this forum, and I don’t really know how much it accepts idle bellyaching… a “safe space”? but, while I appreciate that shitty breakups can trigger the most fatalistic cynicism in people, you’re obviously over-reacting. You had a bad experience. Fine. You have decided not to date anymore… probably over-reacting. Telling others not to date because it’s not worth it? Com’on. There are a lot of institutional inequalities against men. Those need to be resolved. There is a lot of no…
/r/MensRights17/08/26 03:02 PM
55

Good. It is clear to me that it is now time for an absolute scourge of lawsuits. We should all have the same amount of guts to take illegal sexual discrimination to the mat through the legal system.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/26 02:03 PM
30

You have to understand it is a religion. “It helps men too” is sort of a “Jesus saves” sort of presumption. To me, it is frustrating, that such a baseless ideology could persist, least of all in academic circles, but here we are. They believe a lot of things that are demonstrably false, which don’t stand up to the faintest scrutiny, but through which they believe men are victims of their own hand, explaining why men simply fail to… act the same as women. There is the “gender is a construct”, par…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates17/08/26 04:53 AM
11

There will always be bigots in the world. The work we need to do is get them out of government, and schools, and to start to use our legal system to penalize them when their bigoted ideas turn into illegal actions.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/08/26 05:33 PM
22

Misandry. I think it used to be about equality maybe, but not it is a new religion with “original sin” replaced with simply “men”.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/08/26 04:26 PM
8

It’s time to start with the lawsuits.
/r/EverydayMisandry16/08/26 01:25 PM
9

The trouble is that hateful men are pariahs. It’s taboo, and it’s relegated, as it should be, out of the limelight. But hateful women are on center stage, in media, in academia, and in government. Misandry is policy, in a lot of cases, and we need to reverse that. That’s not Internet flame war, that is material, affecting ordinary people. California just made it a mandatory requirement for parents who want to volunteer in their kids classrooms to take a “how to spot a predator” course. That is m…
/r/MensRights15/08/26 05:37 PM
1

I don’t know if we need an “ism”. We’re just decent people opposed to prejudice bigotry in all its forms.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/08/26 07:38 PM
1

Like I said, I was a Feminist. I’d prefer to keep calling myself a feminist, but I must concede that the term no longer means something I can associate myself with. Wrestle the term back? Make it mean equality again? Sounds fruitless. The entrenched bigots are too defended in their fortresses as unquestioned authority as leaders of “feminism”. No way to dethrone them. A man saying “you’re not a feminist, you celebrated feminist author”. No chance. So feminism itself has to go out of styles. The …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/08/26 07:33 PM
3

I mean, maybe it is projection, but I accredit their dominance to the simple fact that regular people weren’t paying attention. Fuck, for most of this mutation, I considered myself a feminist. We went out and got engineering degrees, lived our lives, and weren’t even aware that Feminism was morphing into bigotry. They went off, got women’s studies degrees, and made lives around productizing hate. Attacking corporations and institutions, forcing those institutions to make jobs for their “diversit…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/08/26 06:56 PM
10

Well, fortunately, we have correctness on our side. The flat-earthers will probably always exist, but the spherical-earthers still rule the day. Related to misandry and bigotry, we’ve let them take over the internet and pop culture. Metaphorically, flat-earth is making its way into schools. But, the arguments crumble on scrutiny. The flat Earthers must retreat to echo-chambers because their beliefs can’t survive interrogation. We just have to be brave enough to apply misandry to scrutiny. When s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/08/26 04:41 PM
28

Honestly, I think we’ve got this. I feel bad. I’m in my 40s. When I was a kid, diversity was LOVE. I was, and still am, in for it. Having a liberal outlook was about loving people who are different than you and combatting prejudice. And I lived my life. Did my thing. But, for basically the entire time, I was aware that something cancerous was brewing. People saying “men are pigs” or “kill all men”, and I just didn’t pay any attention… I brushed it off as a few crazy assholes from hateful echo ch…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/08/26 03:22 PM
2

Honestly, I think the lawsuits have to come after. Or else, the threat of reprisals is too severe. They still have your kid, and a knob to twist against your children’s future.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/08/26 11:38 PM
6

Truly, I think the path forward is lawsuits. The world needs people who have these experiences to bring them to the attention of law enforcement.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/08/26 11:04 PM
9

You’ve never heard anyone say they were demotivated by an unfair teacher? That seems like a ubiquitous part of the educational experience for many people. Labeling that unfairness as institutional sexism… I mean, that’s the point of this conversation.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/08/26 11:01 PM
16

I have seen my sons pour their heart out into assignments, and get surprisingly mediocre grades for their work. Being conditioned to expect your teacher will grade you unfairly… kind of knee-caps your motivation. We would need to see more studies, but plenty have now been published that girls get better grades for the same work. So, your anecdotal prejudice, which might be true or not. It’s not clear, is entirely immaterial to the point that boys are being subjected to widespread institutional s…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/08/26 07:22 PM
26

I have come to the conclusion that this is merely the effect of some millions of misandrist bigots working in education. Like how the prevalence of some racists could be found to have a cumulative effect on a particular races’ test scores. It is consistent with modern feminism to believe that men are inherently privileged, (which is obviously, by definition, prejudice), and it is therefore pro-equality to “even the playing field”… and hurt male children. And, my view is simply that these bigots …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/08/26 07:17 PM
1

We need to expand the definition of religion to be a rigid ideology based on subjective interpretation or belief, so we can classify feminism as a religion, and get it out of state institutions.
/r/MensRights12/08/26 08:28 PM
1

“We will hold both boys and girls accountable for any failure to act like a girl”.
/r/MensRights12/08/26 08:24 PM
2

Well, when “feminists” start to take their misandry out on male children, then they are responsible and must be held to account.
/r/MensRights12/08/26 06:30 AM
2

Ironically, accusing men of misogyny all the time is the primary form of the prejudice (biased judgements about people based on a superficial trait) and bigotry (hateful prejudice). So, presuming every man is misogynistic… brainwashed by the patriarchy, etc IS BIGOTRY. A strange sort of reflective meta bigotry, but bigotry all the same. And I find that to be a repaying pattern with misandrists: projecting offense as defense. Accusing others of what they’re doing, while they’re doing it. Accusing…
/r/MensRights11/08/26 07:09 PM
13

At this point, /r/feminism should basically be banned as a hate sub. There is a distinction between paying attention to issues of equality, where I’m sure there are still a few, and combing the web for any excuse to say hateful shit about men. One could imagine a sub about immigration, sometimes talking about illegal immigration, and fostering productive conversations about the issues related to immigration. And, on the other hand, you could have a 24/7 doom scroll, focusing exclusively on immig…
/r/MensRights11/08/26 06:25 PM
70

Yeah, this is what turned me from a bystander to someone actually invested in this cause: when the misandrist bigots started coming after the children. That’s that last straw. The line you don’t cross. We HAVE TO protect our children from the harm these people are doing to them… right away… yesterday.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates11/08/26 06:15 PM
6

I agree with feminists who don’t know much about feminism. The idealistic feminists who believe feminism is about equality, and therefore are happy to call themselves feminists, are fine. But, people who buy into a mythology of male original sin, and a false history of women as having been feckless oppressed weaklings throughout all of history, and men as evil oppressors since the dawn of time. I mean, misandrist bigotry is in the introduction.
/r/MensRights11/08/26 04:01 AM
1

It’s time to start suing schools. That seems like the biggest singe effective thing we could actually do. I believe it would be effective. I believe legal proceedings would uncover plenty of blatantly illegal sexist bias. Most importantly, I believe school districts would react, and actual change would occur.
/r/MensRights11/08/26 02:39 AM
4

Yeah, men need to learn to control their emotions. Lose your temper, lose your job, or your marriage. Ironically, men are accused of “toxic masculinity” when they can’t repress their emotions, because the world is especially intolerant of men expressing emotion. And the term “man up” does not mean “stop crying”. The expression exists, but it means to stop feeling sorry for yourself and fix your problems. I’m not sure what cartoon world people are living in where they think parents are going to c…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/26 01:51 PM
46

Masculinity just means man like. “Toxic masculinity” is just misandry. It really is. Men are people, and have emotions. Not all of them are positive. Men, like all people, deserve sympathy and compassion for the emotions they struggle with. Labeling emotions as “toxic” just persecutes people for their emotions, and is entirely ironic when supposedly coming along with this notion that men are supposed to express their emotions. But, emotions aren’t trained. Scientifically, men DO NOT cry less bec…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates10/08/26 05:34 AM
15

Society will be fine. This sort of stuff will never defeat the human race. It might just mean your country or culture doesn’t survive. Right now, the U.S. is like a past-his-prime roid-junky body-builder, whose unsustainable doping has left them sickly. They still look good… mostly… in sort of a plastic way, but you can start to see the damage. They have heart problems. The seams are starting to show. Convincing a generation of women that they should be “good feminists” and “defy gender roles”… …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/26 09:27 PM
88

It is just amazing to me how there is this constant churn of “creative content” that is basically new and interesting things for misandrists to hate-scroll. “Choose the bear” “manspreading” “Brock Turner” “weaponized incompetence”… But, really, there is an appetite for the content, and it sells, because misandry has been normalized.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/26 08:30 PM
-21

It’s hard to say, really, because the product of sports is not athletics so much as it is drama. I say this as a long time sports fan. It’s no hate, but it is, essentially, reality TV. It’s the first, best, reality TV. “What would happen if we took ordinary people, put them on an island, and made them compete in stupid games for prizes”. “What would happen if we took the worlds best athletes, put them into an arena, and made them play a real sport for fame and glory”. So, the human element sells…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates09/08/26 08:17 PM
10

Yeah, it doesn’t get a lot of defense, especially with Epstein and whatnot, but the truth is that humans reach sexual maturity around puberty… 14-16 years old. Growing up, I do not know anybody who got to 18 before they had sex, and 14, 15 years old was about the horniest I ever was. Teens have sex. An adult shouldn’t be having sex with people under 18 because it is the law, not because it somehow represents a malfunction in their biological programming.
/r/EverydayMisandry09/08/26 06:22 PM
91

You ask a women why she hates men, she will give you a summary of the best talking points from the misandrist hate scroll she consumes. Ask a man why he hates women and he’ll say that he does not hate women.
/r/EverydayMisandry08/08/26 05:34 AM
41

Can’t effectively make men into monsters, without turning women into damsels in distress.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/26 05:02 PM
192

I’m not going to watch that whole thing, but yeah, there seems to be a perpetual push to make the actions of all men, at all times, subjected to the judgement of subjective interpretation. I.e. unprotected from persecution. A women goes after a wealthy powerful man? Totally fine. But, if he upsets her, she is free to say she didn’t have consent due to the power imbalance which invalidated her consent. Two people get drunk, have sex, have a great time? No bid deal. Happens every Saturday. But, if…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates07/08/26 03:06 PM
1

In the U.S., you still have between 1870 and 1920, where women’s voting is a reasonable gripe.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/26 01:23 PM
32

It is a bit of an echo-chamber, but not too bad. I have found it refreshing to find a place where discussing how misandry is actually… not good, does not get downvoted into oblivion. But, a week or so ago, I mentioned how there have been times where women have had legitimate grievances warranting organized opposition citing voting rights… and I did get downvoted. But, like -1 rather than -30. Still not great. I would not feel comfortable being part of a space that was merely anti-women, and I do…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates05/08/26 04:56 AM
11

Legally, I would say the woman should maintain complete and unabridged authority to have an abortion. From a marriage and relationships perspective, a woman who does not deeply consider the opinions of her spouse when making this decision, abort or keep, is not a good person. Keeping a baby your partner doesn’t want and aborting a baby your partner does, both essentially annul the marriage. These are things married couples have to agree on. Like deciding to move to another country. Technically, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/08/26 11:34 AM
5

I think, if we started a few lawsuits, there’d be plenty of plain old biased grading, and widespread incidence of female teachers subjectively grading their male students lower. The emotional abuse, the scrutinization of male traits, subtle favoritism… who knows. But I think you could easily prove plain, simple, biased grading.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/26 02:40 PM
31

Misandrist bigotry in the education system is disadvantaging a generation of men every single day. There are plenty of other problems, but this is the big one. We need to get the lawsuits against school districts going. There is widespread institutional sexism significant disadvantaging millions of children in ways that will affect their long term life trajectories. I can’t think of anything more damaging or urgent.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/26 11:47 AM
26

Left ,vs Right .vs Democrats.vs Republicans. But what you’re saying is essentially equivalent to saying “The republicans need to give up xenophobia”. The Democrats use misandry for votes. It’s not something they have tolerated for too long, it’s something they cultivate and exploit. The “gender pay gap”, and the Democratic frontrunner constantly saying “women make .79 cents on the dollar for the same work”. That is a hateful lie. If it were true, which it isn’t, that’d make someone really really…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/08/26 10:07 AM
8

Wow, so ironic, because the antinatalists forums seem to be of a majority of women.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/07/26 06:49 PM
1

Again, I don’t see a problem expressing opinions between genders unless those are the sorts of opinions people shouldn’t have in the first place. “I’m concerned about dating a woman who’s dated 50 guys because I’m looking for true love here, and what, ‘I’m lucky number 51?’. I don’t think it’s healthy to build muscle memory to think of relationships as disposable”. Or. “I’m afraid, no matter how good I am, I will never be better than every guy she’s slept with in every way, and that I’ll always …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/26 08:28 AM
1

I may be an idealist, but I disagree. I guess I’d have to think about it, but I was raised on that being wrong. Common? Sure. A natural trend for people to self-segregate? Absolutely. And a negative human tendency that requires vigilance to address. There were two studies I think about. 1) the tee shirt study. Students at a school were randomly assigned different colored shirts at the start of the year. By the end up the year, they had negative stereotypes about the other color. 2) self evaluati…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/26 10:49 PM
4

Just be the change you want to see in the world. There is no movement, just right and wrong, and people who won’t let wrong skulk by as normal without compliant.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/26 10:25 PM
9

You think the fundamental character of humans just flipped? It’s like “sci-fi” except it is false-history. Read the characters from Shakespeare. Norse and Greek history. Taming of the shrew. 1500s. What are the women like? Athena? Goddess of wisdom? People haven’t changed. Humans are humans are humans, and it is actually pretty much sexist misogyny to diminish the women of antiquity as somehow just feckless subservient weaklings. Fortunately, it’s not true. For all of the evidence I’ve seen, wom…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/26 03:13 PM
6

Ah, an expert on medieval royalty now, eh? Have you ever met a woman? Did your mom do whatever your dad said? What about your grandma? Great grandmother? The default relationship dynamic I’m aware of is wives bossing their husbands around. Search the advice columns and compare the prevalence of “how do I make my husband” .vs “how do I make my wife” prefaced posts. Have you ever known women to just be obedient servants? Ever? You’re making up a false history. And, it’s still acceptable for a man …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/26 02:34 PM
7

But birth control wasn’t widely available until the 1960s. Prior to that, women had, on average 8 KIDS. Also, no formula. Breast feeding only. No disposable diapers. No baby monitors. It is true that the majority of women were busy with their on average 8 KIDS, meant they were less prominent in other areas. That is not the same as being disallowed. As in all of history, the primary badge of freedom is wealth. The queen of England had plenty of privileges. It is misandrist mythology to, by defaul…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/26 01:57 PM
26

I do not accept the fundamental premise that men have always been bad to women. To me, that is modern mythology. People love eachother. Dads love their daughters. Husbands love their wives. This whole notion that, since the dawn of human civilization, it’s just been men abusing women constantly, does not seem empirically true. In a mixed gender space, any one you can think of, are men just hurting women all the time? Grocery store? Restaurants? At the movies? And generally, I oppose gender segre…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/26 09:20 PM
22

Classic case of projection huh?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/26 08:26 PM
79

Men are imperfect. Humans are imperfect. That’s humanity. But a world without men would mostly be without roads, electricity, and houses too. To pretend that men do more harm to women than good, that the world would be, in any way, better for women without men in it, is obviously just misandrist bigotry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 03:17 PM
5

I mean, these quotes are basically taken under duress. If he says “you know what, I think guys are getting a bad wrap. People pretend that an entire generation of misogynists are being raised, but that’s just a few guys thrust into prominence by misandrists. It is misandry that is widespread and normalized. It’s misandry that has Super Bowl ads.” That would basically end his career. It’s like religion, or McCarthyism. It’s an ideology that does not tolerate other ideologies, and Hollywood, opera…
/r/EverydayMisandry19/07/26 07:08 AM
16

I think I’m going to unsubscribe from this. I know bigots exist already, and I want to be part of the opposition to bigotry, but seeing this sort of stuff on my feed is so demoralizing. Maybe that’s how these women became bigots… looking at hate-scrolls.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/07/26 10:45 AM
16

It’s time to start suing schools for sexist discrimination. A few guys have the guts to do it… courtroom documents proving gender bias in grading, and that should basically do it. Title IX demanding either a “men’s studies” department, or the elimination of “women’s studies” majors. Religion leaked into government, and that’s illegal.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/26 08:04 PM
-6

Right, but historically, in 1914, in the U.S., it was a legitimate grievance.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/26 04:25 PM
4

Well, women didn’t used to have the right to vote, for example, so I can appreciate there were, at some point, legitimate grievances that could be made about gender discrimination against women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/26 10:13 AM
33

Careful mixing church and state like that, especially as reasonable claims can be made that Feminism has become opposed to gender equality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/26 07:29 AM
38

Seems simple enough: divide and conquer. Trickle down economics. Imagine you are a member of the budding United States royal class. You have a network of other powerful people, and you’ve pretty much got the U.S. Congress doing whatever you want. Regular Americans are basically your serfs… not a genuine threat to your power in any way. But you have to keep getting your people elected… over and over… a few representatives “by and for the people” get elected, and you’re fucked. Once the people sta…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 06:58 PM
18

Textbook prejudiced bigotry. Really pretty pathetic we’re still dealing with bigotry 101 in this day and age. You know who commits crimes? Criminals. Just to make it plainly obvious that you are a bigot, let’s just do a little swap for you: “Don't black people commit the most crimes, hate the most and do the most atrocities? All of this is true, yet they aren't held accountable.” Wow, that’d be some racist bullshit wouldn’t it? That’s you. Using a prejudice stereotype to condemn a group by a hat…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 10:41 AM
22

Yeah, it is a strange sort of sexism, really truly, and totally incongruous. “Until feminism women were just weak feckless downtrodden servants to evil bad bad men forever.” And. “Why does everybody ignore the contributions of great women thoughout history?” Can you please pick a lane? It’s totally incongruous, as would be the whole idea of equality if you believed it. If you believe that women, of equal number, thoughtout all of history, were categorically and consistently completely overpowere…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/26 11:48 PM
56

Sadly, the blame is Feminism itself. It is based on the mythology, that many believe, like astrology or flat earth… pick your mass misconception, that the history of mankind is that of men, forever, since the dawn of the species, oppressing women. It’s a worldview with women as innocent victims and men as evil subjugators. So, to them, equality is not men and women being treated fairly. It’s payback time. Anything that hurts men and helps women is “equality”, because things have “always been une…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/26 08:15 PM
31

It is all projection and hypocrisy. “If all you‘be ever known is privilege, then equality feels like oppression”. Exactly the life of a woman. Favored in every possible way, but especially in education, so when they encounter equality “OMG, someone interrupted me in a meeting!” It feels like oppression.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/26 04:17 PM
8

Prejudice instead of understanding. Literally all it is. Negative stereotypes. I.e. prejudice.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/26 02:34 PM
19

That is the opposite of the stereotype I know. I will never eat the last of anything, and to me, that is absolutely core dad ethos.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/07/26 11:22 PM
7

It’s literally just boring old bigoted prejudice. It’s not even new. People should be judged by the content of their character, not by superficial traits. On Average, black people tend to commit more crimes than other races in the United States. That’s what the statistics seem to prove. It is, however, completely unacceptable behavior to meet a black person, and think they are on the hook for the crimes of people who aren’t them, because they happen to have the same colored skin. It’s basic, van…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/26 10:42 PM
18

I’m sorry misandry is so trendy right now. But, the only way through social propriety is to have some backbone. It takes guts. It would be nice to live in a time where there was no racism, sexism, bigotry, or hate. I wouldn’t hold your breath. Fuck. How do you think Black people feel. But you don’t accept it. Call shit out: “that is prejudiced bigotry, and I don’t think that’s okay”. These opinions might seem impenetrable, but they’re not. They’re fragile. If you speak up, you very well might ge…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/26 06:42 PM
18

Yep: “failing to follow orders” = “weaponized incompetence”. Nobody ever seems to ask if it is acceptable for people in an equal relationship to presume to boss eachother around and get upset at non-compliance. I’d love to see the gender-reversed reaction: “I told my wife exactly what to make me for dinner, and the incompetent idiot didn’t even make me what I told her to make. I got home, and I was like, where’s my food bitch?”.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/07/26 05:59 PM
17

I believe in equality. Many people believe Feminism is about equality. Why not? That’s what it says on the box. I have no problem with anyone who believes in equality. But, when it comes to evaluating feminism itself, it becomes a semantic debate about the true feminism. Does it mean equality, or something else? And it took me a while to come to terms with that question, and to try to approximate what the sum/average feminism is. There are fringes of every movement. If one crazy asshole says the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 07:49 PM
4

Just open your eyes a little. How does Trump have any supporters? Ask yourself that? It’s because some people believe his bullshit, accept his excuses. Because words are cheap. Actions count. Judge the actions. “What if?” Obama’s campaign promises were insincere? Have you ever ventured to ask yourself that? That is only the level of scrutiny we’d all hope Trump supporters would employ. Just daring to ask “is this guy just saying what I want to hear?” What is a simpler explanation? Obama wanted t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 02:56 PM
11

He had complete control over choosing his cabinet. Legally. He chose to let a Citibank executive decide. Listen, I voted for Obama. I donated the max to Obama, but he turned out to be a crook. That’s why I say he’s like the Democrat’s Reagan. Judged by speeches and stage presence, probably the best president of my lifetime. Judged by actions and how much they contributed to ruining the country… awful.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 02:53 PM
8

An oft-cited excuse, but totally without merit. The Democrats had veto-proof majorities in all bodies of government, and did nothing. Then a prominent Democrat, Joe Lieberman, a former VP candidate switched parties to seal the deal. They never even tried. It was never the plan. It was a “campaign promise”. I’m sorry. It was hard for me to believe too, but it is what it is. Plenty of other campaign promises were broken too. “No lobbyists in my administration” broke that INSTANTLY. In spite of all…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 02:11 PM
35

The weird thing is, they always talk about it like it’s “messaging”, which essentially means “marketing”, and never ask knowledgeable any substance. And the left? What are they? The LGBT+ neocons? They don’t need to market better. They need to be better… but they won’t, because that is opposed to their fundamental character. The Democrats, essentially, need to be overthrown, and completely gutted and replaced with a party that aren’t corporate whores. Obama is basically the Democrats’ Reagan. In…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 06:13 AM
12

Again, it would need to be proven to be statistically significant to make that claim. Online .vs In Real Life. So far, we were talking about both of these in terms of Online. When it comes to “real life” we’d need to know what the predominance is of misandristic women acting hatefully towards men .vs misogynistic men acting hatefully towards women in real life. But I think, in that too, there is more evidence that I am aware of regarding female->male bigotry. What turned my attention to this was…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 11:16 PM
24

Flat Earthers are out there, but it’d still be bigotry to find a few flat earthers and use that to say “men think the world is flat”.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 09:50 PM
70

Ironically, the same people who would use terms about “toxic masculinity” would turn around and say “cry more”, mock your “fragile male ego” and ridicule the emotions they pretend to encourage. Listen, all you can do is your part. Nobody can change the world, they can only be the change they want to see. You see bigoted prejudice… against anyone say something… not because it will change the mind of the bigot saying it, but because it battles the social propriety of spreading bigotry. You worry, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 09:42 PM
41

Personally, I have never come across any “manosphere” content other than that which was promoted by Feminists using those communities as excuses to justify general hatred of men. It’s like how Fox News pounces on every crime committed by an immigrant to validate xenophobia. I have seen no evidence to suggest that men turning to red-pill misogynistic dating strategies is, in any way, widespread. Last time I checked, about 10,000,000 people still thought the world was flat. Finding an idiot champi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 09:36 PM
4

I mean, really, when you think about it, it’s obvious. When it’s Rome against the Goths, or Germans against the French, or Israel against the Palestinians… the women are on the same team with the men in their society. Every time. And then, it’s not like we just invented love. Men and women loving each other is about the most fundamental part of the human condition there is. So yeah, pretending society is somehow men .vs women “and always has been” is simply misandrist bullshit. Truly. That is no…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/26 07:38 AM
35

There is no need to dignify bigotry. Bigots are going to bigot. Trying to adapt your behavior to evade what bigots might think of you is a losing battle. I believe in equality. Feminism has nothing to do with equality. Some feminists are fine, just as I’m sure many National Socialists were fine. Sort of disinterested and saying “yeah, I’m pro equality, of course”, which is a fine point of view. You need to pay a little closer attention to appreciate when the movement you support has drifted a li…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 08:52 PM
13

It is certainly, at least significantly, illegal sexist discrimination against boys. This single issue is what radicalized me. The shift from testing to homework was a shift from objective grading to subjective grading, and boys are graded more harshly than girls by a predominantly female workforce who believe hurting boys and helping girls is “equality”.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 02:13 AM
75

Feminism has become a religion. It is a rigid ideology, based on the agreeable premise of promoting equality, but, at this point, deeply entangled with the worldview that men and women are natural enemies, and men are the bad ones. Like any good religions it has many legends, fables, and ethos that are considered fundamental truths without basis in evidence, (boys are raised to [insert whatever unfounded assumption you like]). And, like any other religion, the zealous followers try to infiltrate…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 06:39 PM
21

It’s a religion. The funny thing to me is that nothing ever really changes. Go to any period in history, and the prevalence, in society, or people who derive their self-confidence by their assurance in their “especially righteous” beliefs, and their zealous condemnation of the infidels… that’s any give Tuesday at any time in history. It’s just, in this era, the devil, in this religion, is men. It’s got all the same ingredients. “Original sin” is “gender norms” and “internalized misogyny”. And th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/26 03:28 PM
3

Yeah, and it’s a facile bait and switch. “Equality” great. “Helps everyone” love it, (Actually spend all day spreading bigotry and lauding sexist double-standards)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/26 03:18 PM
12

All it takes for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing. People are allowed to believe whatever they want, but this is essentially religion. Tax dollars should not fund religion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/26 02:49 PM
9

Ah, the book was actually “Sexual Politics”. And that was the origin of the term in relation to modern feminism. In the book she says “All forms of human inequality arose from male supremacy and the subordination of women, that is, from sexual politics, which can be considered as the historical basis of all social, political and economic structures". Which is, complete bullshit at a surface level. No struggles over land or resources? No imbalances in military technology? all forms are just about…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/26 06:42 AM
30

The irony, and self-fulfilling cyclical nature is just absurd. “Throughout history, women were thought of as overly emotional, fragile, and illogical, and that’s misogyny”. Then: “Trigger warning, accidental micro-aggressions are completely devastating to us, looking at us the wrong way makes us have panic attacks, and the whole world needs to constantly be careful to not hurt us with these small things that we think of as very big things”. So… you are fragile, and need protecting, because you a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/26 06:45 PM
33

The term “patriarchy” was coined, in relation to feminism, in a book called “gender politics”, which framed feminism in a bad plagiarism of Marxism, swapping capital with men and workers with women. The book also framed gender relations as, essentially, men and women being natural enemies, and this being the cause of all problems in history. Nobody should take it seriously. It’s basically hate speech.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/26 02:17 PM
42

It’s just “divide and conquer”. Democrat used to mean “workers”, and progressive used to mean “wanting to destroy trickledown economics”. Democrat meaning “different oligarchs” and progressive meaning “obsessed with gender identity” seems to have effectively dispersed any momentum the movement was getting in the “occupy Wall Street” days.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/26 05:22 PM
4

Paper sees rock. Paper gets burned all the time. Rock never seems to get burned. So paper theorizes that rock must not get exposed to matches as much. The riddle lies in the question: “why do girls dress sexy when they are not trying to attract men?”. That might seem counterintuitive. It did to me. Eventually I figured it out. For a woman, feeling attractive was often a core pillar of their self-esteem, entirely removed from wanting to attract men. That’s the point. And that difference in perspe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/26 03:12 PM
21

Maybe. I would say there is some gradual erosion to the idea that Feminism = Equality. Most are in favor of equality, and to the extent that feminism means equality, most people believe in feminism. But feminism has nothing to do with equality. It considers only the problems women face, with no attempt to compare those problems to those men face. Equality requires that comparison, and feminism is actively hostile to any acknowledgement at all that men face problems, a comparison which leads to t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 02:05 PM
12

It is literally just the “bourgeoisie” from when Feminism was plagiarizing Marxism in the 70s, and they just swapped “men” for “capital” and “women” for “workers”. That’s pretty much it. And it’s really misandrist to even use the term, because the whole premise of the book… “gender politics”, I think it was called, characterized men and women as having been… essentially, natural enemies since the dawn of time. Which is a pretty dumb, and hateful, worldview, if you ask me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/26 11:08 PM
56

It’s just a platitude to make it sound like constant misandrist prejudice isn’t anti-equality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/26 05:25 AM
1

That’s because of this post. It was at +7 when I came across it.
/r/MensRights31/03/26 03:57 PM
4

I disagree. All it takes for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing. I feel partly responsible for this because, for my whole life, I kept my nose out of it. Some people of my generation went off into women’s studies degrees, while others went off to engineering degrees. I would occasionally see something revolting from tumblr or something, but whatever. Plenty of assholes in the world. No alarm. It wasn’t until I had kids that I realized that, while I was blissfully apart from most of…
/r/MensRights30/03/26 09:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter