TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HiggsFieldgoal Archive

View 2 posts and 52 comments by HiggsFieldgoal on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
460

DiscriminationHiggsFieldgoal/r/MensRights30/03/26 04:25 PM
198

discussionHiggsFieldgoal/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/26 03:41 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
4

Wow, so ironic, because the antinatalists forums seem to be of a majority of women.
/r/EverydayMisandry27/07/26 06:49 PM
1

Again, I don’t see a problem expressing opinions between genders unless those are the sorts of opinions people shouldn’t have in the first place. “I’m concerned about dating a woman who’s dated 50 guys because I’m looking for true love here, and what, ‘I’m lucky number 51?’. I don’t think it’s healthy to build muscle memory to think of relationships as disposable”. Or. “I’m afraid, no matter how good I am, I will never be better than every guy she’s slept with in every way, and that I’ll always …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/07/26 08:28 AM
1

I may be an idealist, but I disagree. I guess I’d have to think about it, but I was raised on that being wrong. Common? Sure. A natural trend for people to self-segregate? Absolutely. And a negative human tendency that requires vigilance to address. There were two studies I think about. 1) the tee shirt study. Students at a school were randomly assigned different colored shirts at the start of the year. By the end up the year, they had negative stereotypes about the other color. 2) self evaluati…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/07/26 10:49 PM
4

Just be the change you want to see in the world. There is no movement, just right and wrong, and people who won’t let wrong skulk by as normal without compliant.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates24/07/26 10:25 PM
6

You think the fundamental character of humans just flipped? It’s like “sci-fi” except it is false-history. Read the characters from Shakespeare. Norse and Greek history. Taming of the shrew. 1500s. What are the women like? Athena? Goddess of wisdom? People haven’t changed. Humans are humans are humans, and it is actually pretty much sexist misogyny to diminish the women of antiquity as somehow just feckless subservient weaklings. Fortunately, it’s not true. For all of the evidence I’ve seen, wom…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/26 03:13 PM
4

Ah, an expert on medieval royalty now, eh? Have you ever met a woman? Did your mom do whatever your dad said? What about your grandma? Great grandmother? The default relationship dynamic I’m aware of is wives bossing their husbands around. Search the advice columns and compare the prevalence of “how do I make my husband” .vs “how do I make my wife” prefaced posts. Have you ever known women to just be obedient servants? Ever? You’re making up a false history. And, it’s still acceptable for a man …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/26 02:34 PM
7

But birth control wasn’t widely available until the 1960s. Prior to that, women had, on average 8 KIDS. Also, no formula. Breast feeding only. No disposable diapers. No baby monitors. It is true that the majority of women were busy with their on average 8 KIDS, meant they were less prominent in other areas. That is not the same as being disallowed. As in all of history, the primary badge of freedom is wealth. The queen of England had plenty of privileges. It is misandrist mythology to, by defaul…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates23/07/26 01:57 PM
25

I do not accept the fundamental premise that men have always been bad to women. To me, that is modern mythology. People love eachother. Dads love their daughters. Husbands love their wives. This whole notion that, since the dawn of human civilization, it’s just been men abusing women constantly, does not seem empirically true. In a mixed gender space, any one you can think of, are men just hurting women all the time? Grocery store? Restaurants? At the movies? And generally, I oppose gender segre…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/26 09:20 PM
21

Classic case of projection huh?
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates22/07/26 08:26 PM
81

Men are imperfect. Humans are imperfect. That’s humanity. But a world without men would mostly be without roads, electricity, and houses too. To pretend that men do more harm to women than good, that the world would be, in any way, better for women without men in it, is obviously just misandrist bigotry.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates21/07/26 03:17 PM
5

I mean, these quotes are basically taken under duress. If he says “you know what, I think guys are getting a bad wrap. People pretend that an entire generation of misogynists are being raised, but that’s just a few guys thrust into prominence by misandrists. It is misandry that is widespread and normalized. It’s misandry that has Super Bowl ads.” That would basically end his career. It’s like religion, or McCarthyism. It’s an ideology that does not tolerate other ideologies, and Hollywood, opera…
/r/EverydayMisandry19/07/26 07:08 AM
16

I think I’m going to unsubscribe from this. I know bigots exist already, and I want to be part of the opposition to bigotry, but seeing this sort of stuff on my feed is so demoralizing. Maybe that’s how these women became bigots… looking at hate-scrolls.
/r/EverydayMisandry17/07/26 10:45 AM
16

It’s time to start suing schools for sexist discrimination. A few guys have the guts to do it… courtroom documents proving gender bias in grading, and that should basically do it. Title IX demanding either a “men’s studies” department, or the elimination of “women’s studies” majors. Religion leaked into government, and that’s illegal.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/07/26 08:04 PM
-6

Right, but historically, in 1914, in the U.S., it was a legitimate grievance.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/26 04:25 PM
4

Well, women didn’t used to have the right to vote, for example, so I can appreciate there were, at some point, legitimate grievances that could be made about gender discrimination against women.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/26 10:13 AM
33

Careful mixing church and state like that, especially as reasonable claims can be made that Feminism has become opposed to gender equality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates15/07/26 07:29 AM
38

Seems simple enough: divide and conquer. Trickle down economics. Imagine you are a member of the budding United States royal class. You have a network of other powerful people, and you’ve pretty much got the U.S. Congress doing whatever you want. Regular Americans are basically your serfs… not a genuine threat to your power in any way. But you have to keep getting your people elected… over and over… a few representatives “by and for the people” get elected, and you’re fucked. Once the people sta…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 06:58 PM
18

Textbook prejudiced bigotry. Really pretty pathetic we’re still dealing with bigotry 101 in this day and age. You know who commits crimes? Criminals. Just to make it plainly obvious that you are a bigot, let’s just do a little swap for you: “Don't black people commit the most crimes, hate the most and do the most atrocities? All of this is true, yet they aren't held accountable.” Wow, that’d be some racist bullshit wouldn’t it? That’s you. Using a prejudice stereotype to condemn a group by a hat…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/07/26 10:41 AM
22

Yeah, it is a strange sort of sexism, really truly, and totally incongruous. “Until feminism women were just weak feckless downtrodden servants to evil bad bad men forever.” And. “Why does everybody ignore the contributions of great women thoughout history?” Can you please pick a lane? It’s totally incongruous, as would be the whole idea of equality if you believed it. If you believe that women, of equal number, thoughtout all of history, were categorically and consistently completely overpowere…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/26 11:48 PM
56

Sadly, the blame is Feminism itself. It is based on the mythology, that many believe, like astrology or flat earth… pick your mass misconception, that the history of mankind is that of men, forever, since the dawn of the species, oppressing women. It’s a worldview with women as innocent victims and men as evil subjugators. So, to them, equality is not men and women being treated fairly. It’s payback time. Anything that hurts men and helps women is “equality”, because things have “always been une…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/26 08:15 PM
31

It is all projection and hypocrisy. “If all you‘be ever known is privilege, then equality feels like oppression”. Exactly the life of a woman. Favored in every possible way, but especially in education, so when they encounter equality “OMG, someone interrupted me in a meeting!” It feels like oppression.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/07/26 04:17 PM
8

Prejudice instead of understanding. Literally all it is. Negative stereotypes. I.e. prejudice.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates08/07/26 02:34 PM
20

That is the opposite of the stereotype I know. I will never eat the last of anything, and to me, that is absolutely core dad ethos.
/r/EverydayMisandry03/07/26 11:22 PM
7

It’s literally just boring old bigoted prejudice. It’s not even new. People should be judged by the content of their character, not by superficial traits. On Average, black people tend to commit more crimes than other races in the United States. That’s what the statistics seem to prove. It is, however, completely unacceptable behavior to meet a black person, and think they are on the hook for the crimes of people who aren’t them, because they happen to have the same colored skin. It’s basic, van…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/26 10:42 PM
18

I’m sorry misandry is so trendy right now. But, the only way through social propriety is to have some backbone. It takes guts. It would be nice to live in a time where there was no racism, sexism, bigotry, or hate. I wouldn’t hold your breath. Fuck. How do you think Black people feel. But you don’t accept it. Call shit out: “that is prejudiced bigotry, and I don’t think that’s okay”. These opinions might seem impenetrable, but they’re not. They’re fragile. If you speak up, you very well might ge…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates03/07/26 06:42 PM
18

Yep: “failing to follow orders” = “weaponized incompetence”. Nobody ever seems to ask if it is acceptable for people in an equal relationship to presume to boss eachother around and get upset at non-compliance. I’d love to see the gender-reversed reaction: “I told my wife exactly what to make me for dinner, and the incompetent idiot didn’t even make me what I told her to make. I got home, and I was like, where’s my food bitch?”.
/r/EverydayMisandry02/07/26 05:59 PM
17

I believe in equality. Many people believe Feminism is about equality. Why not? That’s what it says on the box. I have no problem with anyone who believes in equality. But, when it comes to evaluating feminism itself, it becomes a semantic debate about the true feminism. Does it mean equality, or something else? And it took me a while to come to terms with that question, and to try to approximate what the sum/average feminism is. There are fringes of every movement. If one crazy asshole says the…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 07:49 PM
4

Just open your eyes a little. How does Trump have any supporters? Ask yourself that? It’s because some people believe his bullshit, accept his excuses. Because words are cheap. Actions count. Judge the actions. “What if?” Obama’s campaign promises were insincere? Have you ever ventured to ask yourself that? That is only the level of scrutiny we’d all hope Trump supporters would employ. Just daring to ask “is this guy just saying what I want to hear?” What is a simpler explanation? Obama wanted t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 02:56 PM
11

He had complete control over choosing his cabinet. Legally. He chose to let a Citibank executive decide. Listen, I voted for Obama. I donated the max to Obama, but he turned out to be a crook. That’s why I say he’s like the Democrat’s Reagan. Judged by speeches and stage presence, probably the best president of my lifetime. Judged by actions and how much they contributed to ruining the country… awful.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 02:53 PM
8

An oft-cited excuse, but totally without merit. The Democrats had veto-proof majorities in all bodies of government, and did nothing. Then a prominent Democrat, Joe Lieberman, a former VP candidate switched parties to seal the deal. They never even tried. It was never the plan. It was a “campaign promise”. I’m sorry. It was hard for me to believe too, but it is what it is. Plenty of other campaign promises were broken too. “No lobbyists in my administration” broke that INSTANTLY. In spite of all…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 02:11 PM
35

The weird thing is, they always talk about it like it’s “messaging”, which essentially means “marketing”, and never ask knowledgeable any substance. And the left? What are they? The LGBT+ neocons? They don’t need to market better. They need to be better… but they won’t, because that is opposed to their fundamental character. The Democrats, essentially, need to be overthrown, and completely gutted and replaced with a party that aren’t corporate whores. Obama is basically the Democrats’ Reagan. In…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates01/07/26 06:13 AM
12

Again, it would need to be proven to be statistically significant to make that claim. Online .vs In Real Life. So far, we were talking about both of these in terms of Online. When it comes to “real life” we’d need to know what the predominance is of misandristic women acting hatefully towards men .vs misogynistic men acting hatefully towards women in real life. But I think, in that too, there is more evidence that I am aware of regarding female->male bigotry. What turned my attention to this was…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 11:16 PM
24

Flat Earthers are out there, but it’d still be bigotry to find a few flat earthers and use that to say “men think the world is flat”.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 09:50 PM
70

Ironically, the same people who would use terms about “toxic masculinity” would turn around and say “cry more”, mock your “fragile male ego” and ridicule the emotions they pretend to encourage. Listen, all you can do is your part. Nobody can change the world, they can only be the change they want to see. You see bigoted prejudice… against anyone say something… not because it will change the mind of the bigot saying it, but because it battles the social propriety of spreading bigotry. You worry, …
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 09:42 PM
41

Personally, I have never come across any “manosphere” content other than that which was promoted by Feminists using those communities as excuses to justify general hatred of men. It’s like how Fox News pounces on every crime committed by an immigrant to validate xenophobia. I have seen no evidence to suggest that men turning to red-pill misogynistic dating strategies is, in any way, widespread. Last time I checked, about 10,000,000 people still thought the world was flat. Finding an idiot champi…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates30/06/26 09:36 PM
4

I mean, really, when you think about it, it’s obvious. When it’s Rome against the Goths, or Germans against the French, or Israel against the Palestinians… the women are on the same team with the men in their society. Every time. And then, it’s not like we just invented love. Men and women loving each other is about the most fundamental part of the human condition there is. So yeah, pretending society is somehow men .vs women “and always has been” is simply misandrist bullshit. Truly. That is no…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/06/26 07:38 AM
35

There is no need to dignify bigotry. Bigots are going to bigot. Trying to adapt your behavior to evade what bigots might think of you is a losing battle. I believe in equality. Feminism has nothing to do with equality. Some feminists are fine, just as I’m sure many National Socialists were fine. Sort of disinterested and saying “yeah, I’m pro equality, of course”, which is a fine point of view. You need to pay a little closer attention to appreciate when the movement you support has drifted a li…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 08:52 PM
13

It is certainly, at least significantly, illegal sexist discrimination against boys. This single issue is what radicalized me. The shift from testing to homework was a shift from objective grading to subjective grading, and boys are graded more harshly than girls by a predominantly female workforce who believe hurting boys and helping girls is “equality”.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates28/06/26 02:13 AM
75

Feminism has become a religion. It is a rigid ideology, based on the agreeable premise of promoting equality, but, at this point, deeply entangled with the worldview that men and women are natural enemies, and men are the bad ones. Like any good religions it has many legends, fables, and ethos that are considered fundamental truths without basis in evidence, (boys are raised to [insert whatever unfounded assumption you like]). And, like any other religion, the zealous followers try to infiltrate…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates27/06/26 06:39 PM
21

It’s a religion. The funny thing to me is that nothing ever really changes. Go to any period in history, and the prevalence, in society, or people who derive their self-confidence by their assurance in their “especially righteous” beliefs, and their zealous condemnation of the infidels… that’s any give Tuesday at any time in history. It’s just, in this era, the devil, in this religion, is men. It’s got all the same ingredients. “Original sin” is “gender norms” and “internalized misogyny”. And th…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates26/06/26 03:28 PM
3

Yeah, and it’s a facile bait and switch. “Equality” great. “Helps everyone” love it, (Actually spend all day spreading bigotry and lauding sexist double-standards)
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/26 03:18 PM
12

All it takes for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing. People are allowed to believe whatever they want, but this is essentially religion. Tax dollars should not fund religion.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates18/06/26 02:49 PM
8

Ah, the book was actually “Sexual Politics”. And that was the origin of the term in relation to modern feminism. In the book she says “All forms of human inequality arose from male supremacy and the subordination of women, that is, from sexual politics, which can be considered as the historical basis of all social, political and economic structures". Which is, complete bullshit at a surface level. No struggles over land or resources? No imbalances in military technology? all forms are just about…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates16/06/26 06:42 AM
29

The irony, and self-fulfilling cyclical nature is just absurd. “Throughout history, women were thought of as overly emotional, fragile, and illogical, and that’s misogyny”. Then: “Trigger warning, accidental micro-aggressions are completely devastating to us, looking at us the wrong way makes us have panic attacks, and the whole world needs to constantly be careful to not hurt us with these small things that we think of as very big things”. So… you are fragile, and need protecting, because you a…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/26 06:45 PM
32

The term “patriarchy” was coined, in relation to feminism, in a book called “gender politics”, which framed feminism in a bad plagiarism of Marxism, swapping capital with men and workers with women. The book also framed gender relations as, essentially, men and women being natural enemies, and this being the cause of all problems in history. Nobody should take it seriously. It’s basically hate speech.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates14/06/26 02:17 PM
42

It’s just “divide and conquer”. Democrat used to mean “workers”, and progressive used to mean “wanting to destroy trickledown economics”. Democrat meaning “different oligarchs” and progressive meaning “obsessed with gender identity” seems to have effectively dispersed any momentum the movement was getting in the “occupy Wall Street” days.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/26 05:22 PM
4

Paper sees rock. Paper gets burned all the time. Rock never seems to get burned. So paper theorizes that rock must not get exposed to matches as much. The riddle lies in the question: “why do girls dress sexy when they are not trying to attract men?”. That might seem counterintuitive. It did to me. Eventually I figured it out. For a woman, feeling attractive was often a core pillar of their self-esteem, entirely removed from wanting to attract men. That’s the point. And that difference in perspe…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/06/26 03:12 PM
21

Maybe. I would say there is some gradual erosion to the idea that Feminism = Equality. Most are in favor of equality, and to the extent that feminism means equality, most people believe in feminism. But feminism has nothing to do with equality. It considers only the problems women face, with no attempt to compare those problems to those men face. Equality requires that comparison, and feminism is actively hostile to any acknowledgement at all that men face problems, a comparison which leads to t…
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/06/26 02:05 PM
12

It is literally just the “bourgeoisie” from when Feminism was plagiarizing Marxism in the 70s, and they just swapped “men” for “capital” and “women” for “workers”. That’s pretty much it. And it’s really misandrist to even use the term, because the whole premise of the book… “gender politics”, I think it was called, characterized men and women as having been… essentially, natural enemies since the dawn of time. Which is a pretty dumb, and hateful, worldview, if you ask me.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates04/06/26 11:08 PM
56

It’s just a platitude to make it sound like constant misandrist prejudice isn’t anti-equality.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates29/05/26 05:25 AM
1

That’s because of this post. It was at +7 when I came across it.
/r/MensRights31/03/26 03:57 PM
4

I disagree. All it takes for evil to triumph is for good people to do nothing. I feel partly responsible for this because, for my whole life, I kept my nose out of it. Some people of my generation went off into women’s studies degrees, while others went off to engineering degrees. I would occasionally see something revolting from tumblr or something, but whatever. Plenty of assholes in the world. No alarm. It wasn’t until I had kids that I realized that, while I was blissfully apart from most of…
/r/MensRights30/03/26 09:38 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter