TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Hirudin Archive

View 15 posts and 1,958 comments by Hirudin on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
703

Hirudin/r/MensRights23/04/13 02:33 PM
643

Hirudin/r/MensRights21/07/13 11:06 PM
550

Hirudin/r/MensRights26/10/13 07:12 PM
189

GeneralHirudin/r/MensRights30/01/18 07:47 PM
97

Social IssuesHirudin/r/MensRights26/07/18 06:28 PM
42

Edu./Occu.Hirudin/r/MensRights24/04/17 03:42 AM
35

Hirudin/r/MensRights19/02/14 07:31 PM
17

HumourHirudin/r/MensRights19/01/19 06:31 PM
15

QuestionsHirudin/r/MensRights17/05/17 12:17 AM
15

Marriage/ChildrenHirudin/r/MensRights03/05/18 02:34 PM
11

Hirudin/r/TheRedPill27/04/14 01:56 AM
9

Hirudin/r/MensRights30/10/12 01:12 AM
9

Hirudin/r/MensRights10/10/18 04:24 AM
7

Hirudin/r/MensRights06/11/12 04:44 PM
6

Edu./Occu.Hirudin/r/MensRights14/03/18 01:35 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,958 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Lawyer
/r/MensRights31/12/23 02:58 AM
44

89% of people in prison for drug offenses are men. Ask them if they think men are doing 89% of all the drugs.
/r/MensRights28/12/23 05:44 PM
2

Remember one line: "Who raised those men?"
/r/MensRights23/12/23 04:30 PM
8

It's women raising those men.
/r/MensRights23/11/23 10:21 PM
30

Both men and women have a greater chance of birth defects as they age, however the effect is far, far more pronounced in women. The main factors in this are roughly as follows: Men constantly produce new gammetes, therefore newly produced sperm do not accumulate long term environmental damage. Women however are born with all the eggs they will ever have, meaning that as time goes on damage from lifestyle choices, age and even just the background radiation of the universe all continually take the…
/r/MensRights28/10/23 11:56 AM
0

Maybe don't call it radicalization for starters. People in favor of circumcision should be painted as the radicals.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 07:53 PM
6

You know it's the states legislative branch that makes laws, right? Not the governor.
/r/MensRights25/08/23 01:19 PM
8

Well that's an assumption. It could very well be higher depending on how good people are at lying.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 06:38 PM
11

already is a suspicion. So it only happens to bad liars... good ones still getting away with it.
/r/MensRights13/08/23 05:33 PM
3

Gish gallop. None of that actually supports anything you're saying but you're hoping that the sheer volume of word salad will give you some semblance of legitimacy. There is no law allowing a man to beat his wife whenever he feels like it. At best you will find some medieval codes that allow a man to discipline his wife when she breaks the law, because if he doesn't then he is responsible for her crimes (blackstone commentaries on common law) but that isn't exactly the same thing now is it? Addi…
/r/MensRights10/08/23 05:30 AM
7

At no point in the Western World (in actuality, not hollywood) were men simply allowed to beat women whenever they wanted with women not legally allowed to defend themselves. The rest of the points are Invalid for other reasons that would take a lot longer to type out but that "beating" bullet point is just plain false on its face.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 10:30 PM
3

Gotta be careful about the classism thing too. There's plenty of elite-sponsored rhetoric floating around trying to define it exclusively in economic terms. I.e. trying to make you mad at anyone who has more than you do, because if you can be trained to fly into a frothing cross-eyed rage at any wealth disparity, you're far more likely to burn down your neighbors slightly larger house than you are to direct your ire accurately at the entrenched political class.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 09:18 PM
6

Yep. Even if a king was technically ranked over a queen at some arbitrary point in history what do you think would happen to some random Duke or baron that tried to order the queen to obey him? Somehow that doesn't count as power.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 09:06 PM
13

1st stage: no one gets to vote, both sexes subject to arbitrary whim of the king: equal but unfair. 2nd stage: men allowed to vote but also required to die for the king. Women don't get to vote but also don't have to die for the king: unequal but fair. 3rd stage men alowed to vote but still required to die for the king. Women get to vote without any obligation: both unequal and unfair.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 09:02 PM
14

OK. This is just a comprehension problem on your part. Read what I wrote again until you understand.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 08:51 PM
26

Only looking at the people at the absolute peak of power is also a cop-out. There's a large catalogue of women who were simply one step to the side of the monarch who wielded considerable influence over them, essentially having 90% of their power but 10% of the risk. Off the top of my head I remember quite a few Roman emperors who got there because their mothers had the previous installment poisoned or whatnot. It's easy to say that "only men had power" when positions held by women suspiciously …
/r/MensRights09/08/23 08:48 PM
1

No fault divorce wouldn't be so bad if it was actually a cessation of responsibilities for both parties. Unfortunately that is not the case since the role of provider in the relationship continues even afterward, effe timely meaning that the obligations of marriage contine, but only for, typically, the man.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 08:35 PM
12

I don't think you've really wrapped your head around what I'm saying. Regardless of what the UN claims to support, they do not actually care that men may be denied the right to vote on the grounds that they refuse to be thrown into the trenches. Their position is hypocritical. Voting is still, to this day, a de-facto privilege for men while it is a right for women. In the past it may have wrongly be considered a privilege, but it was considered a privilege for everyone earned by willfully allowi…
/r/MensRights09/08/23 08:24 PM
15

Well you're clearly trying to disingenuously shift the goalposts here. But as far as being allowed to vote is concerned, yes, women do not have any comparable responsibilities. The vote is a clear example of a aspect of society in which women experience significant and measurable privilege over men.
/r/MensRights09/08/23 08:18 PM
16

but voting isn't a privilege it's a right Again, only if you are a woman. A man who fails to sign up for the draft will not be allowed to vote. It's amazing how many people don't know this or can't wrap their heads around the idea even when stated plainly. were women asked to if they could choose to go to the military in exchange of being able to vote? Yes actually. The main arguments of the anti-suffragists (a majority of whom were women) argued against the right to vote on the grounds that it …
/r/MensRights09/08/23 08:09 PM
32

Because when men got it, it was seen as a privilege granted in exchange for the responsibility to submit to military service if demanded by the government No such obligation was placed on women. This remains the status quo to this day. The vote is a privilege with responsibilities for men, and a right without responsibility for women. Additionally, significantly more men had to die to get the vote, as with the Chartists, than women had to in order to get the same thing. The delay in achieving fu…
/r/MensRights09/08/23 06:25 PM
4

Just what the MIC needs: even less accountability.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 02:17 PM
10

Child support is still being paid because the state gets federal funding based off how much child support they award, so they'll look for any excuse to have someone pay child support to someone else, regardless.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 07:47 PM
13

Whenever the topic of slavery comes up, people always wonder how anyone could have supported such an institution through most of recorded history. The way people felt about slavery in times past is exactly the way people feel about alimony today. Suggest abolishing it and people generally look at you like you're crazy, present company excluded of course.
/r/MensRights11/07/23 07:43 PM
8

Clean medical equipment (only possible with a functioning sanitation system) would save more lives than non-sanitary medical equipment. So already off the bat you have a significantly higher mortality rate even without considering how many more diseases would about with raw sewage in every street. And while I don't have any statistics at hand, I do have doctors themselves, overwhelmingly agreeing that sanitation was by far the biggest lifesaver of the last 150 years. https://www.theguardian.com/…
/r/MensRights10/07/23 07:59 PM
7

Of you had to choose between having a healthcare system and a functioning sewer system, statistically you'd save more lives choosing the latter.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 07:29 PM
11

Men can and would fill in as nurses if need be. And theyd have time to adjust because the things that actually keep society running dont stop. A society where men don't keep the power on is a society that doesn't have power, and all activities requiring that power, like healthcare, cease also.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 06:31 PM
10

Healthcare as we know it doesn't happen if the power is out.
/r/MensRights10/07/23 05:48 PM
1

Let's see who raised the overwhelming majority of those shooters.
/r/MensRights30/03/23 05:00 PM
64

Consider also the oceans of blood men had to spill, others and their own, in order to get those rights to vote... for a mere 10 years until it was simply given to women also. E.g. the Chartists and WWI
/r/MensRights23/03/23 02:33 PM
3

They still think they're "punching down".
/r/MensRights13/03/23 12:22 AM
3

It was revealed to him in a benadryl fueled fever dream
/r/MensRights10/03/23 04:21 PM
10

A string on Nero's fiddle snapping isn't worth commenting on while Rome burns.
/r/MensRights10/01/23 05:22 PM
3

Yes. Because they legally arent given the option.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 03:06 AM
3

Yes. Women are responsible for the children they decided to have on their own. Welcome to equality.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 03:02 AM
1

It literally does though.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 02:31 AM
3

Most people have two parents. Yes. Look up the parentage of the vast majority of murderers and get back to me.
/r/MensRights23/12/22 01:45 AM
9

Exactly. Cant exactly move on when uncle sam tells you that your relationship obligations aren't optional.
/r/MensRights22/12/22 03:14 PM
7

"Who raised the murderer?"
/r/MensRights22/12/22 02:34 PM
3

Of course the final insult is that whenever this incredibly common form of abuse happens against a man, it gets recorded officially as an instance of a use against a woman. This skewed data is then used as justification to make this type of abuse against men even easier to legally commit.
/r/MensRights15/12/22 09:57 PM
18

Mirror, mirror in my hand, who is the fairest in the land.
/r/MensRights13/12/22 09:04 PM
16

Unfortunately the government doesn't see in that way and will very much force a man into commitment, one way or another, at the barrel of a gun, either via direct payments or indirectly through taxation.
/r/MensRights01/12/22 06:24 PM
8

Flying murderbots seem a little new though.
/r/MensRights30/11/22 12:52 PM
68

"Do the bare minimum, achieve more than than the average feminist woman by accident, and get called a bigot for noticing."
/r/MensRights19/11/22 04:33 AM
3

"The devil made me do it."
/r/MensRights16/11/22 12:52 AM
31

You may have died, but we have to be sad about it afterward.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 05:50 AM
1

Remind her that men can be feminists too .
/r/MensRights01/10/22 02:48 PM
13

A kafkaesque cloud of doubt a feminist squirts out to evade responsibility for the consequences of policies they favor.
/r/MensRights29/09/22 02:49 PM
15

Feminists complaining about "pick me" girls is just an iteration of their "crabs in a bucket" mentality. They're incapable of being decent to any man in their lives, so the only way they can compete against those who aren't incapable is to tear them down and shame them into compliance with their harpy ways.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 09:14 PM
1

Patronized or Matronized?
/r/MensRights13/04/22 07:53 PM
427

Ahoy fellow men. Isn't it simply amazing how all of our housework just magically does itself even when we live by ourselves?
/r/MensRights17/03/22 10:44 PM
7

You've really got to clarify your stance here. I think what you meant to say is that in the world, as it is right now, acting vulnerable is a bad idea for the average man. In a more ideal world though a man could let his fears and uncertainty's be known without having to worry about the women in his life recoiling with disgust. Since we don't live in that ideal world though, telling men that they should go ahead and be open about their doubts is just setting them up for failure since it will rob…
/r/MensRights07/03/22 02:27 AM
22

If a woman wants to harm someone, she has far more entirely legal ways to do so. Paternity fraud comes to mind: almost 100% legal way for a woman to utterly destroy a man with almost zero possibility of the man ever being made whole again afterwards even if the woman is caught red-handed. The Duluth model and family court in general are also a good example: Absolute, unresistable, and often wildly unjust state violence used disproportionately against men for the benefit of women, but since it's …
/r/MensRights09/12/21 06:03 PM
10

I think when mentioning the percentage of men who are domestic abuse victims, it's important to also include the context of the fact that official institutions always looking for any possible excuse to not count men in those numbers and also to compare that percentage to the proportion of resources available for male victims of DV, which is basically 0%. Additionally, that's the percentage if you don't include the amount of resources devoted to actually go out of their way to further harm male D…
/r/MensRights19/11/21 03:02 PM
5

Gladly. Though my info was a tad out of date (I now realize) and it has balanced out a bit in recent years, the incarceration for drug offenses is still heavily weighted against men. As of 2019 there are 176,300 (estimate) people incarcerated for drug offenses in state prisons. Of those roughly 24,500 are women. Making men roughly 87% of those incarcerated in state prisons. By those same sources, men make up roughly 91% of those incarcerated in federal prisons for drug offenses. I do not have da…
/r/MensRights19/11/21 02:53 PM
14

Currently 98% roughly 88% of people in prison for drug charges are men. Do you think men are using 98% 88% of all the drugs? edited for old numbers.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 12:39 PM
5

And if we take a step back we realize the utter absurdity of this supposed oppressor/oppressed dynamic. It's seen as entirely rational by society at large that a member of the "oppressed" group can dictate when and how a member of the "oppressor" group can even be allowed to gaze upon them in public. No one with that degree of enforceable control over someone else can possibly be considered oppressed by the person they have that control over. It's just completely asinine. Can any of us imagine a…
/r/MensRights18/11/21 02:50 PM
50

Primary aggressor policies and training (and all other variants and offshoots of the Duluth model) are 100% the fault of feminists. Remember that.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 03:49 PM
364

"Why aren't the serving classes remaining unnoticeable like they're supposed to!?! I nearly fainted!"
/r/MensRights20/10/21 01:00 PM
6

No one ever gets done paying child support and says "You know what, maybe I'll do that again on purpose."
/r/MensRights19/10/21 01:26 AM
2

The entitlement is over 9000
/r/MensRights18/10/21 03:43 PM
3

Couples therapy these days is often just a struggle session that you have to pay for.
/r/MensRights15/10/21 01:48 PM
6

nah, it's been around for a while.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 06:22 PM
31

It's brag-plaining. Oh no, too many people are complimenting you, you poor thing. How hard it must be to not receive exactly your preferred number and variety of compliments, only from exactly the people who you want giving them. Someone should start another charity for you.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 05:52 PM
12

Don't buy a boat though. It's just a hole in the water you throw money into.
/r/MensRights13/10/21 01:44 PM
10

Chances are that they're including living in a house paid for by someone else but being expected to keep it reasonably clean while doing so counts as "24 hr on-call house cleaning service"
/r/MensRights13/10/21 01:05 PM
5

This sounds like a woman who will never listen. It's pointless to engage directly, but you may be able to get some mileage out of having a conversation in front of an audience, where her hypocrisy can be laid bare, however that ends up happening.
/r/MensRights06/10/21 04:39 PM
6

I believe it has become increasingly socially acceptable to attack or vilify individuals with "privilege" because of their "privilege" and that's where stuff like that comes from. Ironically reversing the privileged/disadvantaged dynamic. The disadvantaged group is the one that's socially acceptable to be attacked by the privileged group.
/r/MensRights15/09/21 02:22 PM
25

gave women voting rights It gave only women voting rights. More than 100 years later, voting for men remains a privilege that is bought with an agreement to leave the trenches and run towards the machine gun fire if commanded to by the government.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 02:52 PM
2

between 2009 and 2016, 100% of US presidents were black, therefore black people were privileged between those years. obvious /s Notice how their definition of "positions of power" is always carefully crafted to avoid including any influential position that tends to be majority female. The education system comes to mind. Notice also that they focus on the sex of the people in these positions of power and not their ideology, because it turns out that males can be feminist too and it would be devas…
/r/MensRights21/08/21 01:45 PM
1

If you know they aren't going to let you in to the refugee camp, why make the trip?
/r/MensRights20/08/21 07:41 PM
5

Anytime you hear anyone say "think of the women/children" reach for your wallet because someone's probably got their fingers in it, and if you hear anyone saying otherwise... you probably should have a good idea where their fingers are.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 02:50 PM
2

The only thing that the feminists who "aren't like that" ever contribute to the discussion is to run interference and cover for the activities of feminists who most certainly are like that. Beyond that, the contribution of feminists who "aren't like that" is effectively nonexistent. Show me a feminist who doesn't fit into this dichotomy and I'll show you a "feminist" who is hated almost universally by every other feminist.
/r/MensRights19/08/21 12:19 PM
9

The whole idea of "punching up" is self-defeating. In any situation where you're allowed to abuse someone in a way that they would not be allowed to abuse you... you're always punching down. That's what oppression is. The instant you're allowed to do that, socially, legally, or both... you're the oppressor.
/r/MensRights18/08/21 01:38 PM
10

Ironically proving the opposite in the process. True. It's a vicious inversion. The more that discrimination against a particular group is seen as not a big deal (and therefore ok to commit without rebuke) is the very thing that makes it worse.
/r/MensRights07/08/21 01:00 PM
10

I've always hated that saying. It should be: "To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize accurately" If you just start dishing out unfair criticisms and wild claims left right and sideways you're going to get shit on by everyone and that's not going to be proof that you're in the right. So then it falls upon the person making the criticism to do a little introspection: "Is what I'm saying really true, both in letter and spirit?" and if so, then you might fi…
/r/MensRights05/08/21 08:57 PM
3

You ever ride two at the same time like Zorro?
/r/MensRights31/07/21 11:33 PM
6

Yet 90% of men are in long term relationships gonna need a source on this one. Every one I've seen has had that number substantially lower.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 09:38 PM
7

Nope I made this acc to post here That's what I just accused you of. ”women aren’t worth the investment anymore” And I addressed this. Troll elsewhere. Apparently the concept of "emotional investment" isn't a phrase you've ever heard of before so I highly doubt that you're here to provide us with any enlightening ideas.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 09:29 PM
9

You can invest in things besides stocks and bonds. Please review the many different uses of that particular word. There is nothing even remotely problematic with the idea of "investing in someone". Also, you are clearly a troll who created this account 22 minutes ago.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 08:40 PM
19

not helping, dude.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 03:02 PM
62

This is the important part here. This isn't the same as when feminists argue that "not all men are like that" is irrelevant because some men are. If a woman runs into a man who is like that she has a plethora of legal options to deal with it after the fact. If a man attempts to rape a woman she can shoot him and society and the legal system will say "well done". However, if a woman attempts to destroy a mans life and/or enslave him via the ridiculously biased laws we have on the books there are …
/r/MensRights31/07/21 02:38 PM
9

Said it better than I could.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 02:21 PM
19

And in this case the minefield is 50% mines and 50% dirt... and people who reach the treasure with a few limbs missing are counted as "successes"... and people who got a foot blown off and then hobbled away are counted the same as people who never even attempted to cross in the first place... and the people compiling the numbers are prosthetic salesmen.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 02:01 PM
24

Exactly. The problem here isn't women, but rather the behavior that is encouraged in women by the legal atmosphere we all exist in, and being encouraged to behave in a certain way does not guarantee that any particular women will act that way. The reason this must affect relationships with all women though is because there is no way to parse out the good ones from the bad beforehand and no legal way to avoid or seek redress for mistreatment after the fact since its all legal and socially accepta…
/r/MensRights31/07/21 01:36 PM
11

Ok. I agree with him then. Women in general have been conditioned by the legal privilege they all enjoy to make it unwise to risk a relationship with one, in spite of the existence of women who will not take advantage of those privileges granted to them, since 0% of the male population possesses the abilities to read minds or travel through time that would be required to discern which women those are, and dealing with the bad ones after the fact isn't an option since the behavior the bad ones en…
/r/MensRights31/07/21 01:26 PM
23

quit trolling. You know what was meant even if you won't say so. This is a comment section, not a dissertation. This whole "you can't mention who is legally favored or you're a bigot!" meme only has one purpose. Everyone here knows now that you aren't arguing in good faith and that your real intent is to undermine actual discussion with nonsensical and arbitrary tone policing. If I said "decades of neglect have ruined infrastructure in this country" and advised people to use caution when using i…
/r/MensRights31/07/21 12:45 PM
29

Relationships with women certainly are. And he clearly states that feminism (not a synonym for women) is to blame. And it isn't sexist to say to, any more than it would be to tell women to avoid men in a parallel universe where the government made it legal for men to abuse women, nor would it be sexist for women to note how the general behavior of men trended for the worse as a result of that. Edit: Also can't help but notice that you just breezed by addressing literally anything that I said.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 12:40 PM
25

they aren't because they'll treat you like shit. because they're legally allowed to. Of course he didn't say all the legal stuff because it's just known at this point and discussion of the implications of divorce are inherently legalistic in nature and therefore doesn't need to be repeated ad-nauseum. The fact that this kind of mistreatment is entirely legal of course results in an increase of women being willing to mistreat men in this manner. This isn't a dig at women (in spite of your desire …
/r/MensRights31/07/21 12:34 PM
68

This isn't really saying that women are the worst, but rather that the legal system has introduced huge lopsided risks to the equation that make these relationships a bad idea for men. Take any two populations and give one of them the ability to legally harm the other without risk of consequence and you'll see an increase in the abuse of the second at the hands of the first. In some parallel universe where the balance of legal risk vs. reward was reversed in favor of men, then women would be doi…
/r/MensRights31/07/21 12:02 PM
13

There was a period where married women could not legally be held accountable for any debts they owed. Unsurprisingly, no one wanted to lend money to someone legally protected from having to pay it back, without having someone else roped in who they could go after for non-payment. This part, left out of the narrative, means that what is always portrayed as oppression was, in fact, just a negative side effect of a massive privilege that some women had over men.
/r/MensRights31/07/21 11:54 AM
3

Considering how hard it is to escape being harmed by an easily provably false accusation, it's kind of sobering to think how screwed we are if the liar is even halfway competent at it.
/r/MensRights30/07/21 12:12 PM
11

Meanwhile: Man receives single graceless compliment about his appearance from a stranger 10 years ago. It's one of his most cherished memories.
/r/MensRights29/07/21 06:58 PM
41

Sorry but it’s biology. Then you ask them which gene expression takes the money out of the man's wallet and hands it to the woman.
/r/MensRights27/07/21 01:34 PM
49

In the same vein it's absurd that whenever a refugee situation happens, the volunteers tally up the people in the refugee camps, find that they're filled mostly with women and children, and then determine that women and children are disproportionately affected by the crisis. Not once does it occur to them to ask "where exactly are the men?"; just assuming that they're out having a grand ol' time somewhere else smoking cigars and grilling, and not dead in a ditch.
/r/MensRights08/07/21 04:51 PM
10

Emotional labor is working all day and then dreading going back home to a tongue lashing for not tidying up a place that would have stayed clean all day had you remained single.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 06:45 PM
17

Women have a 2-1 hiring advantage when they actually apply for tech jobs and can expect to be promoted far faster than men of equivalent experience and skills. That's "asking". To get any more, society would literally have to force women to do those jobs and I hope you can see the issues with that.
/r/MensRights04/07/21 06:37 PM
25

We already went past the whole "but its intrusive!" excuse when we asked the man to labor for dozens of hours of his life each week for the same reason. Suck it up buttercup. It's for the child, not for you. Quit complaining. Spending a half hour cataloging what the money was spent on (even if we didn't use any kind of restricted debit card system and decided to go with the most ineffecient method possible), it still wouldn't be too much to ask.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 05:06 PM
42

Yes.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 04:12 PM
15

Remove patriarchy theory from feminism and you're basically 95% MRA.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 03:53 PM
8

survivorship bias.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 03:51 PM
84

Opponents of this will inevitably say some variant of "We can't do that! it'll make things harder for the mom!"... thereby instantly and inherently abandoning their position that the money is for the child. Maybe it's ok to ask mom to do a little bit of paperwork and have manage her purchases to make sure the child is actually being taken care of.
/r/MensRights28/06/21 03:49 PM
2

For some reason we don't have a murderer registry. Explain that.
/r/MensRights22/06/21 03:21 PM
1

to build up our immunity to them
/r/MensRights21/06/21 02:49 PM
3

Someone needs to dub in some Scooby-Doo running SFX.
/r/MensRights15/06/21 07:36 PM
1

Reference to purgatory?
/r/MensRights13/06/21 02:14 PM
15

Just use your male privilege, duh. It's on the shelf, right next to the cake you eat when you run out of bread.
/r/MensRights12/06/21 10:06 PM
13

"mAyBe If YoU jUsT cRy MoRe ThAt WiLl MaKe ThInGs BeTtEr."
/r/MensRights12/06/21 09:03 PM
4

A part of the reason for the disparity in official statistics of crime between men on women can be accounted for in the fact that so many blatantly evil things that women can only do to men are completely legal. A woman doesn't have to beat her man. All she has to do is call 911 and tell a semi-believable story and then, at no risk to herself, uniformed government agents will show up to abuse her SO for her.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 06:59 AM
19

Because they are sexist.
/r/MensRights11/06/21 06:44 AM
22

Words for unhealthy expectations forced upon men by society: Toxic masculinity. Words for unhealthy expectations forced upon women by society: Misogyny, Patriarchy aka: When it happens to men its men's fault and men need to change to fix it. When it happens to women it's everyone else's fault and men need to change to fix it. Sexism when men are given unfair advantage: Privilege Sexism when women are given an unfair advantage: bEnEvOlEnT sExIsM. aka: When men are treated better it's evidence wom…
/r/MensRights10/06/21 05:21 AM
1

Instead we get denial and coverup. Id argue that what we get is worse actually. We get: "Yeah, so what? Charges dropped." At least with the priests everyone was on board with the idea that it was, in fact, a crime if it happened. The fact that large parts of society are ok with it means that it's worse, not better. Just like any kind of bigotry, the irony is that the one that people care about the least is usually, because of that, the one that needs to be paid the most attention.
/r/MensRights10/06/21 12:39 AM
7

If you want to put her on the defensive, one point you could bring up is that despite the prevalence of the meme of "Priest molests children" the rate of "teacher has inappropriate relationship with child" (the majority of the perpetrators being female) is at least an order of magnitude higher per capita... but for some reason that doesn't make the headlines or get lifetime movies made about it. Edit: It's actually two orders of magnitude
/r/MensRights09/06/21 04:34 PM
6

Well... a male feminist is a man who hears someone say "all men are rapists!" and thinks to himself "yeah, that sounds right."
/r/MensRights05/06/21 03:22 PM
20

They go home and turn on the TV. Unrealistic. Power would already be out.
/r/MensRights05/06/21 03:15 PM
21

At this point, the with the numbers involved a liberal/democrat/leftist woman willing to make a false accusation against a man for any infinitesimal political gain are a dime a dozen. Forget any kind of neutral starting point like "trust but verify". You should start with the assumption that they are lying and are being financially backed in doing so, and work your way forward from that point.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 04:27 AM
10

Hell, Cuomo was accused of sexual assault in order to obfuscate from the fact that he killed thousands of nursing home patients. Then the fact that he, as a democrat, was accused of sexual assault was obscured further by accusations of sexual assault against a republican (Gaetz)... and now no one is talking about the thousands of deaths Cuomo is directly responsible for.
/r/MensRights11/05/21 04:22 AM
14

Paying the majority of taxes while receiving and being eligible for the least in government benefits (explicitly because of gender and skin color) would be instantly recognizable as undeniable proof of systemic bigotry if it were happening to any other group of people.
/r/MensRights10/05/21 06:50 PM
1

What do you think they talk about as AA meetings?
/r/MensRights10/05/21 02:12 PM
4

Hell we don't need to incentivize boys. All we need to do is to stop actively disincentivizing them. The messaging that young boys get from pretty much everywhere these days is downright malicious and there's 0% chance that it's unintentional.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 10:08 PM
22

"You noticing evidence of my distain for men is exactly the reason why my distain for men is justified." What a lovely little Kafkaesque logic loop she's made for herself. Turnabout is fair play: Tell her that the mere fact that she thinks that it's different when she does it is, by itself, evidence of her bigotry, and the fact that society tolerates and accepts her particular brand of bigotry (while it rightfully attacks other kinds of prejudice) is evidence of privilege that she has over other…
/r/MensRights06/05/21 09:47 PM
3

They strive for privilege, not justice So... they are SJWs then. Just because they slap the word "justice" onto one of their blatantly prejudiced pet-projects doesn't make it so as their ideas of "justice" vary wildly depending on the social origin of the person they want to apply it to.
/r/MensRights06/05/21 08:49 PM
134

The fact that paternity fraud isn't a felony makes it plainly obvious that we do not live in a patriarchy of any sort. Any other instance of fraud that resulted in harm, monetary or otherwise, on the scale of the average paternity fraud already routinely results in years-long prison sentences. A woman can steal decades of life and hundreds of thousands of dollars from a man, say "tee hee, oopsy doodle", and walk away a free person, and not only is she not made a pariah for her actions, in some c…
/r/MensRights05/05/21 02:01 AM
1

No. I'm fully aware of the "It's only other men, not me, who are the problem." type men. however for brevity I did not mention them.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 11:15 PM
4

The trash women talk about men usually has the force of law behind it. It can still harm you no matter how fervently you ignore it.
/r/MensRights27/04/21 07:00 PM
1

They want to be equal to some fantasy version of men that exists only in their heads, where we don our monocles, sit around all day in leather chairs smoking cigars and drinking brandy, clad in monogrammed robes, discussing which native lands we should build the new railroad through.
/r/MensRights13/04/21 01:15 PM
1

Yes. And usually judges do it specifically because the prenup functions as intended and use that as the reason why it should be thrown out.
/r/MensRights11/04/21 12:37 AM
7

There needs to be a push to give judges way less leeway in overturning prenups. If that can be accomplished, hopefully it can open the door to expanding what can be dictated under a prenup in the first place.
/r/MensRights06/04/21 02:10 PM
3

For all their talk of empathy, it is damn hard to get them to see things from a man's point of view, or to even entertain the idea that such a thing exists and that it is different from what feminist dogma dictates that it must be.
/r/MensRights01/04/21 11:20 PM
294

I like how that chart basically says that a woman can be completely ignorant on a particular topic yet still dictate to a male subject matter expert when he is allowed to talk about his area of expertise in her presence. I'm just marveling at the sheer level of narcissism and utter lack of introspection the person who made this chart must have had in order to do so. Switch the genders around and this is basically "Quiet, Missy. The Men are Speaking": The Chart.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 01:52 AM
13

If you're in favor of birth control and abortion but not legal paternal surrender, you aren't pro-choice. You're pro-convenience.
/r/MensRights22/03/21 05:57 PM
12

BY OTHER MEN and this is used as evidence that men are targeting women for violence, when all of the numbers suggest that men who commit violence are specifically avoiding attacking women when there are male victims to be had instead.
/r/MensRights15/03/21 06:09 PM
26

"he avoids serious conversation" If we avoid serious conversation it's because we know that you aren't up to the task of participating in it. You aren't going to like or know how to deal with what we say and chances are that you will react incredibly poorly and erratically when real talk gets underway.
/r/MensRights15/03/21 12:13 AM
3

Plus there's no real way to defend yourself after you find out which woman it is. The system that is supposed to protect people from other forms of attack is the very thing being used to attack you in the first place.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 08:17 PM
4

'We have an irrational fear of you, therefore you are privileged."
/r/MensRights14/03/21 08:14 PM
16

The closest that there has ever been to a rule allowing men to beat their wives was some acceptance of husbands physically preventing their wives from committing literal crimes. This was because back then wives themselves could not be held accountable legally for these crimes, while the husband could be punished for them if he knew about them and did not take steps to prevent his wife from committing them. If the husband did anything more than absolutely necessary to prevent his wife's illegal b…
/r/MensRights02/03/21 06:16 PM
3

Saying fathers just not asking for custody is the entire reason for the discrepancy is like saying that East and West Germany were similar places to live because there were relatively few crossings... after the walls, snipers, and minefields were put in place. No shit men are giving up earlier. If your prospective choices are 1) lose your kids or 2) lose hundreds of thousands of dollars, get accused of assault as a part of you Ex's legal strategy, and then lose your kids anyway... no shit, fathe…
/r/MensRights27/02/21 09:54 PM
22

Feminists think that if they take one single step to the side of the center of political power that it absolves them of any responsibility when the policies they champion are enacted by "someone else".
/r/MensRights22/02/21 05:27 PM
18

pay all of it All net taxes. Important caveat.
/r/MensRights18/02/21 05:14 PM
2

If you've been paying attention to all the ridiculous shit they accuse the MRM of, you'd be an idiot to believe anything the same damn people say about other groups. “Briefly stated, the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect is as follows. You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well. In Murray's case, physics. In mine, show business. You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually …
/r/MensRights12/02/21 04:53 PM
19

Seems kinda obvious in hindsight that people who react to their negative emotions by pro-actively attempting to fix whatever is causing those emotions would have a better outcome than people who just cry about it.
/r/MensRights27/01/21 05:09 PM
43

One of the main reasons that men appear to commit more crime than women is that a huge amount of the blatantly evil stuff that women are uniquely capable of is not only entirely legal, but socially accepted as well.
/r/MensRights26/01/21 05:58 AM
1

If women were judged by the same standard of men, literally half of them would have been in prison at some point.
/r/MGTOW21/01/21 09:09 PM
14

when proven key detail here. Also, switch the genders of that case around (aka a blacked-out girl getting caught giving a passed-out guy a handjob) and no one would have even thought of calling the cops in the first place. Lastly: outliers have little to do with averages, by definition.
/r/MensRights20/01/21 02:25 AM
97

You're switching up the definitions. There mere existence of a crime is not evidence of a "culture of (said crime)" but rather the widespread legal and social acceptance of that crime being committed without rebuke. Rape does not fit that definition since, when it's proven in court, it is routinely severely punished. Also, before you start on it, demanding due process (and, you know, actual evidence) in rape trials is not evidence of rape culture. Conversely. False rape accusations are rarely ev…
/r/MensRights19/01/21 10:02 PM
390

Rape is illegal and is severely punished in pretty much every country on Earth when proven (and even when not proven in a growing number of supposedly developed countries). False accusations of rape however are de-facto legal, even when a conviction in a court of law occurs. If a "culture of (insert crime here)" exists and is evidenced by a casual social acceptance of said crime, then the only "culture" that truly exists is one of false accusation.
/r/MensRights19/01/21 08:08 PM
17

The irony being that if it becomes socially acceptable (or at least less frowned upon) for any particular group to be abused within a society... it immediately becomes "punching down" when that abuse is actually committed. The whole concept of "it's ok to punch up" is self-negating.
/r/MensRights19/01/21 05:51 PM
5

Brrrrriiing out... the larger scales!
/r/MensRights18/01/21 06:33 AM
6

Also, should a political establishment that has shown that it is perfectly ok with denying access to social media to half of the country be in charge of distributing health care services to those same people. "We swear we won't discriminate based off political affiliation" they say/said.
/r/MensRights11/01/21 11:03 PM
11

IS this a fucking joke? I think he means severe jail time for for those making false accusations. Just misunderstood.
/r/MensRights06/01/21 06:09 PM
12

Men can't afford to pull stunts like "tee hee lets not show up for work to show them wimmens" because the consequences of men doing that would be an immediate apocalypse.
/r/MensRights05/01/21 07:17 PM
3

I think it would be ironic if everything was made out of iron.
/r/MensRights28/12/20 06:46 PM
6

Every single woman I know has experienced sexual assault or at least an uncomfortable sexual situation Every single man I know has experienced getting murdered or at least getting incorrect change at checkout.
/r/MGTOW10/12/20 02:02 PM
3

Yup. I wince when I hear ferminist stories about how horrible it is when the police "do nothing" (ususally because they couldn't be bothered to actually call them). I just want to remind them that, when abuse against men is concerned, the authorities "doing nothing" is the good outcome compared to the usual alternatives.
/r/MensRights09/12/20 07:12 PM
3

it's a blatant form of abuse society chooses to ignore actively facilitate. FTFY
/r/MensRights09/12/20 05:41 PM
4

The U.S. supplied Russia with food provision, guns and tanks. Also, almost all of it's trucks and half of its fuel. Of course as soon as any supplies actually arrived in Russia the white star was quickly painted over with a red one.
/r/MGTOW07/12/20 08:51 PM
1

3 at least should have the added caveat of the woman not being eligible for child-related welfare. Otherwise it's just men collectively rather than individually paying for children who aren't theirs through the net taxation imbalance.
/r/MensRights06/12/20 02:46 AM
2

True, but there is no part of reproduction that biologically extracts money from his bank account either.
/r/MensRights06/12/20 02:44 AM
6

All those to 10% (probably actually closer to 1%) of men at least pretend to be feminist though. They act like simply because some politician is a dude means he can't be one of theirs. Hell, have you ever seen any politician of any party declare themselves to be non-feminist? Even the ones who disagree with feminist dogma know that public criticism is political suicide.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 01:33 PM
5

A feminist whining about "male privilege" is typically surrounded while doing so by people who would be financially, socially, or physically punished for disagreeing.
/r/MensRights05/12/20 01:30 PM
2

"Curvy" these days just means that Tuba music starts playing spontaneously whenever you go outside.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen01/12/20 06:07 PM
20

I just can't understand why most mass shooters are white men. Even while that might be true in absolute numbers, proportionally white men commit fewer mass shootings relative to population numbers. Same is true with serial killers. The only reason people tend to think otherwise is because of entertainment and mass media. If there's an irredeemable creepy stalker or lunatic on a TV show 99% chance that its depicted as a white man with some variety of conservative mindset.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 10:04 PM
6

very rarely but not "never".
/r/MensRights30/11/20 04:40 PM
26

A woman doesn't need to lift a finger to physically abuse a man. All she needs to do is tell the authorities a believable lie and the state will do it for her. A man who tries to report abuse against himself is statistically more likely to be arrested than a woman he reported. Then the ultimate insult: When all is said and done, the instance of abuse against the man is recorded as abuse against a woman, and the resulting statistics are used as evidence to keep these wildly biased policies in pla…
/r/MensRights28/11/20 03:24 PM
12

Because it's not just about funding. A person trying to start a men's shelter is going to face a never-ending assault from feminist organizations. Expect character assasination. Expect never being able to fundraise because feminists will get between you and advertisers, who will avoid you when they are informed that your charity is "problematic". If, any point external to or within your charity itself, there is a single feminist with any power to stop you from operating or to make it harder to o…
/r/MensRights25/11/20 02:31 PM
3

men can be feminists too.
/r/MensRights24/11/20 02:12 PM
58

It is exclusively the fault of feminists, as in, not all feminists are to blame but the people and organizations that are to blame are all feminist.
/r/MensRights23/11/20 09:31 PM
13

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rYG6ijGso2M
/r/MensRights03/11/20 05:46 PM
8

"I want you to kill him so hard he dies to death." her, probably.
/r/MensRights31/10/20 07:37 PM
3

Oh jeez. I'm old.
/r/MensRights29/10/20 04:45 PM
29

A man trying to control a woman's money?: Financial abuse by the man. A man trying to resist having a woman controlling his money?: Financial abuse by the man.
/r/MensRights29/10/20 04:29 PM
2

net taxes, but yes.
/r/MensRights29/10/20 03:18 PM
8

As far as I know, no agency in the US keeps records or does studies of that kind. I have suspicions that the reason is because no scientist wants to lose their job after feminists read the results. There was a New Zealand study that showed quite a discrepancy though.
/r/MensRights29/10/20 02:12 PM
32

they don't clearly specify what is toxic about masculinity. This is by design. It's intentionally vague so it can be used as a rhetorical bludgeon to win arguments. If you can't define what toxic masculinity is, then it's next to impossible for someone that you're arguing against to say with certainty that something isn't toxic masculinity. The closest you're ever going to get to a solid definition is "whatever the feminist you're arguing against doesn't like at that exact moment", and the only …
/r/MensRights27/10/20 02:03 PM
121

Ah yes, all those fathers out there claiming they want to see their kids again just to own teh wimenz.
/r/MensRights26/10/20 08:05 PM
2

A thing to think about also: A basic snowblower also costs around that much. If you have enough customers/neighbors in need of snow removal it might be worth your time to use that money to leverage up into being able to clear even more driveways and earn even more money by giving yourself the ability to quickly plow that snow.
/r/MGTOW26/10/20 07:14 PM
6

The less valuable demands more from the valued. and then holds a long lasting grudge against the valued for that very reason.
/r/MGTOW21/10/20 02:42 PM
2

Bullshit. Being "generous" with someone else's money is just greed with an extra step.
/r/MGTOW21/10/20 02:13 PM
1

It's not. The guy you responded to is just an asshole. Peterson is having quite a hard time, but that's because of his wife's cancer and the fallout of him being overprescribed anti-anxiety meds due to his wife's cancer.
/r/MensRights15/10/20 05:41 PM
49

Man have money. Give money though taxes to woman he's never met...
/r/MensRights15/10/20 05:36 PM
11

His body, his choice. Being forced to work for someone else for two decades is every bit as much a imposition of one's bodily autonomy as being forced to continue a pregnancy.
/r/MensRights07/10/20 01:37 PM
1

You know, there's a reason "Thou shalt not bear false witness" is one of the ten commandments. Modern society really seems to have failed with regards to addressing this type of behavior as the gravely serious crime that it is.
/r/MensRights29/09/20 03:19 PM
1

Remember, even if your job is 100% shitty, you're still more respectable than anyone willingly on the dole.
/r/MGTOW23/09/20 02:13 PM
3

Historically, before the time of DNA tests or even blood type tests, it was basically impossible for a man to know, for sure, if his kids were actually his. For a woman, the exact opposite was true. There would have to be some major mixup in order for her kids to not actually be hers. With the changing of names, the man could at least have some sense of "ownership" of his progeny in the same manner that women nearly universally posses. Follow me on this journey: Maternal grandmother=most investe…
/r/MGTOW21/09/20 01:49 PM
61

British women have always inspired British men to become the world's best sailors.
/r/MGTOW20/09/20 12:54 AM
3

Sane person: "Avoid swimming around here. There are crocodiles." You: "Don't tell people to watch where they swim. Tell crocodiles to stop biting people." Sane Person: That's retarded. You: "It would appear this promotes accountablity to the crocodile, and removes victum blaming. Does this offend you?"
/r/MensRights16/09/20 05:08 PM
1

Whew. look at them goalposts go! When they go in, only 3% have a bachelor's degree or above. That's well below the general population. 18 year-olds typically have fewer bachelors degrees than the general population of all ages? No Shit. I think you have a fundamental misunderstanding about how time works.
/r/MensRights15/09/20 02:58 PM
1

Every time I hear that phrase I wonder to myself whether it's take 6 or 7 figures worth of government aid to get her to that point in life.
/r/MGTOW14/09/20 05:18 PM
1

It's mostly poor uneducated people who currently serve. The average educational level of those who have been in the military is significantly higher than the general population.
/r/MensRights14/09/20 01:36 AM
8

The whole point of conscription is that everyone serves. Literally half of everyone is exempt though.
/r/MensRights14/09/20 01:32 AM
1

It's impossible to be sexist to men. Tell her that any man she tells this to is experiencing sexism, right then, from her.
/r/MensRights08/09/20 01:09 PM
1

And my whole point was that although being put down because of height sucks, it doesn't even come close to qualifying as "most discriminated against" seeing as how the actual Killing Fields (and modern equivalents) exist and short men aren't literally being hunted for the purposes of explicit, unambiguous extermination, and that saying so will make people roll their eyes just because of how ludicrous such a claim is. Making these kind of over-the-top, flat-out-incorrect statements will turn peop…
/r/MensRights06/09/20 03:05 PM
1

Boy I have. No, you haven't
/r/MensRights06/09/20 02:55 PM
7

Most discriminated against? What? Look I'm not the tallest guy and it's annoying at times, but I haven't exactly been through the Killing Fields because of it and neither have you. This kind of hyperbole is not needed.
/r/MensRights05/09/20 02:41 PM
2

99% chance that she supports the movements that she is begging to not burn her business to the ground.
/r/MGTOW03/09/20 04:10 PM
15

When it comes to feminists and men's rights issues there are two groups: 1) The feminists who actively work against men's rights , and 2) The feminists who assure everyone that not all feminists are like the first group, and then do nothing else.
/r/MensRights27/08/20 08:14 PM
2

Normalize men getting help for the problems that result in them needing emotional support. This bandaid-on-gaping-wound shit is getting kinda old, and it seems more like some kind of fucked up kabuki theater where men are expected to pretend that they're ok with never seeing their kids again after getting their single complimentary back rub.
/r/MensRights27/08/20 07:34 AM
9

"Ok, just to make sure I understand your position, you want to mutilate your infant son's genitals so that, in your opinion, it'll look sexier. Should I be calling CPS?"
/r/MensRights26/08/20 10:55 PM
9

We're one step away from re-introducing spectral evidence into court cases. The Crucible was supposed to be a warning, not an instruction manual.
/r/MGTOW25/08/20 12:33 PM
1

Newsflash, ladies: If someone is looking at you, and you think that it's perfectly reasonable to demand that they avert their filthy peasant gaze from you... they aren't the privileged ones.
/r/MensRights24/08/20 08:23 PM
1

She took a bit of a hiatus to deal with some health issues I think. She's posted an update recently. Edit
/r/MensRights24/08/20 12:59 PM
11

If you aren't exercising right now, I recommend at least starting with that. Getting those endorphins flowing can reset your outlook considerably.
/r/MGTOW20/08/20 06:58 PM
3

The next survey should specify human partners.
/r/MensRights20/08/20 04:52 PM
4

If "hit in the nuts intentionally" were to be included in "sexual assault" stats, the rate for men who have experienced "sexual assault" would be almost 100%.
/r/MensRights20/08/20 04:46 PM
1

You can literally take college classes about hating white people and receive credits for said classes. I can watch an entire award-winning netflix series, right now, about justifying hatred of white people. A white person can be told, to their face, in an interview that they aren't being hired specifically because of their race... and not only is it effectively legal to do so, the hiring company would likely face legal consequences if they didn't discriminate in that manner toward white people. …
/r/MensRights19/08/20 07:58 PM
4

When those "not real feminists" write government policy the only thing we hear from the "real feminists" is indecent silence. In fact you "real feminists" only ever seem to show up when it's time to run interference for the "not real feminists".
/r/MensRights15/08/20 03:47 PM
3

What I really want to know is when we're going to hear about Harris' VP pick.
/r/MensRights13/08/20 08:11 PM
6

Questioning how you're transphobic is evidence of transphobia. Please report to gulag for educational seminar.
/r/MensRights11/08/20 07:40 PM
3

I'm more inclined to give deadbeat dads the benefit of the doubt. There's always a pretty good chance that he never wanted to be a father in the first place but was legally forced into it. With all the contraceptive and abortive measures available to women (often at zero expense to themselves) the chance that she became a mother unwillingly is far less, and therefore the chance that she is a deadbeat solely because of her own failings is far greater.
/r/MensRights11/08/20 04:08 PM
7

"Merely laying your filthy gaze upon me is an offence worthy of punishment. Avert your eyes, peasant." A supposedly oppressed person addressing a supposed oppressor.
/r/MensRights11/08/20 12:29 PM
1

"It's ok for me to marginalize groups that are not marginalized"
/r/MensRights10/08/20 09:20 PM
10

“Briefly stated, the Gell-Mann Amnesia effect is as follows. You open the newspaper to an article on some subject you know well. In Murray's case, physics. In mine, show business. You read the article and see the journalist has absolutely no understanding of either the facts or the issues. Often, the article is so wrong it actually presents the story backward—reversing cause and effect. I call these the "wet streets cause rain" stories. Paper's full of them. In any case, you read with exasperati…
/r/MensRights10/08/20 09:15 PM
1

The entire narrative that justifies the lack of an option for legal paternal surrender is based on the inane assumption that being forced to work for someone else for free for a quarter century isn't a violation of bodily autonomy.
/r/MensRights10/08/20 04:28 PM
118

Well keep in mind, generation Z is literally just out of being propagandized to in favor of feminism every day for most of their lives. For this many to be wary of feminism in spite of that fact is actually impressive. The narrative can't support the weight of it's contradictory nature.
/r/MensRights04/08/20 08:32 PM
7

The drop-bear menace.
/r/MensRights28/07/20 12:27 PM
14

Well at least the article had the decency to not try to find a reason why the woman wasn't totally at fault this time. Usually they immediately start trying to explain it away and impart some degree of victimhood on the woman with musings about insanity or prior trauma or some other bullshit. Progress?
/r/MensRights23/07/20 08:18 PM
2

Karen Straughan goes into the history around the middle part of this lecture. Good info all around throughout though.
/r/MensRights22/07/20 05:20 PM
5

the other 3/5ths had their SOs in the room looking over their shoulder when filling out this survey.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 09:57 PM
5

It doesn't matter how much you can bench press if she uses the cops as a proxy for her violence.
/r/MensRights07/07/20 09:10 PM
3

I have literally never seen any significant conversation where men's greater suicide rates are brought up that didn't contain some dippy moo chiming in about women committing more "attempts".
/r/MensRights30/06/20 07:04 PM
5

no. seriously. someone post it there.
/r/MensRights17/06/20 05:24 AM
9

If by "illegal" you mean effectively mandatory. A company that doesn't find some way to shoehorn in every grievance group under the sun (even with it being technically illegal to do so) is going to find itself on the receiving end of an endless parade of lawsuits from the usual mob of woke extortionists.
/r/MensRights16/06/20 11:53 PM
30

From Marx to Stalin in record time. Good job commies.
/r/MGTOW11/06/20 12:39 PM
8

If bigotry against a particular group is socially acceptable or somehow seen as less concerning than when done to others... that's what "systemic oppression" is.
/r/MensRights09/06/20 06:53 PM
2

It's not so much that programs need to be made more inclusive of fathers, but rather that existing programs need to be made less actively exclusive Any funding "to help men up" at this point is just going to be washed out by the funding being used to intentionally keep men down.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 05:28 PM
1

Next we need the DV training materials that feminist organizations send police departments, prosecutors, and judges to be made public by default.
/r/MensRights21/05/20 03:58 PM
4

Studies that successfully "find discrimination against women" often completely exclude a male data-set to compare it to.
/r/MensRights21/05/20 03:55 PM
2

“In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is...in some small way to become evil…
/r/MensRights20/05/20 06:44 PM
1

The point being illustrated here is that even with undeniable first hand proof of mental instability and violent tendencies from the mother, the father still only has joint custody. The judge considers the woman's absurd behavior to be just as bad as the man's attempts to distance himself from it. This is the "fair" system that feminist influence and lobbying reinforces.
/r/MensRights13/05/20 05:18 PM
5

The US has a higher share of single parenting than countries that have had half of their male populations eradicated during civil war in recent memory. Let that sink in.
/r/MGTOW13/05/20 01:44 PM
2

I think the main takeaway from this event should be that everyone realizes that the feminists and the left in general are, in fact, capable of parsing through dubious allegations with a critical eye and having a clear view of what due process is... which means that when they don't do it, it isn't because they are stupid and can't wrap their head around the concept. They know damn well what justice is and they avoid it on purpose when it suits them. The time for giving them the benefit of the dou…
/r/MensRights04/05/20 04:58 PM
7

Switch out the gender of the person saying these things. Even if you made the women grossly unattractive, I guarantee that would be probably be a day the other guy would remember fondly for the rest of his life.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 03:30 PM
450

For the wage gap, you need to find the CONSAD report. It explains, at length why it's bunk, and it's from the very source that feminists like to wave around and claim supports them: BLS.
/r/MensRights20/04/20 02:05 PM
3

Yeah, sure that's exactly what's going on
/r/MensRights16/04/20 06:03 PM
4

If you have two groups of people, and mistreatment of one is vigorously frowned upon while mistreatment of the other in the same manner is seen as not that big of a deal... guess which group is being oppressed. The whole "you can't oppress the oppressor" line of thought is self defeating. The instant that "oppression" against the a group becomes socially acceptable... that's what oppression is. The very idea that an "oppressor" can't be oppressed is itself inherently oppressive to whatever group…
/r/MensRights16/04/20 05:58 PM
2

Hide the Pain Harriet.
/r/MGTOW09/04/20 05:44 PM
3

At this point it's probably more accurate to refer to it as cargo.
/r/MGTOW02/04/20 04:14 PM
4

"We're so inclusive, we're including everyone except you." The left.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 04:49 AM
7

I think that the "working class" is exclusive to people who are, in fact, working, and not just receiving a check from someone who is.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 04:48 AM
2

I mean, guess who gets the bill if their daughter decides she wants to be a 15 year old mom...
/r/MensRights23/03/20 09:55 PM
1

relevant
/r/MensRights16/03/20 02:03 PM
1

The UN was for UN-Naziing the world from the evils of Charlie Chaplin and his army of Nazi dinosaurs.
/r/MensRights09/03/20 05:33 PM
9

Take a gander: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228350210_Gender_symmetry_in_partner_violence_The_evidence_the_denial_and_the_implications_for_primary_prevention_and_treatment https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233694571_In_Dubious_Battle_The_Politics_of_Mandatory_Arrest_and_Dominant_Aggressor_Laws
/r/MensRights05/03/20 10:49 PM
5

"No no, we're very inclusive. We're so inclusive in fact that we're including everyone except you."
/r/MensRights02/03/20 02:39 PM
2

The issue that's being highlighted here isn't that she's cheating per se (We obviously know that both sexes do that) but rather the lopsided response society has to said cheating. With a man the response tends to be "oh, what an asshole" with no waffling around about how he was "driven to it" or "had no other choice" like what tends to happen whenever a woman is demonstrated to have cheated. This goes beyond just mere society attitudes though and extends into the legal realm as well where there …
/r/MensRights02/03/20 02:08 PM
27

"Bring me Solo and the Wookie or swipe left."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/02/20 08:25 PM
4

or if the roller coaster will make it all the way around the loop with you on it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/02/20 05:03 PM
2

Pretty neat hobby. My current hobby is being into shaving semi-regularly and getting occasional hair cuts.
/r/MGTOW25/02/20 12:52 AM
1

It'll be a cold day in hell before I call it anything other than an octothorpe.
/r/MGTOW24/02/20 07:15 PM
2

Those are some fat-ass dachshunds.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/02/20 05:57 PM
24

Tractor oh god why am I laughing so hard
/r/MGTOW20/02/20 02:21 AM
7

Is this some kind of weird British humor that us colonial folk just don't get?
/r/MGTOW20/02/20 02:11 AM
11

Flower, gleam and glow Let your power shine Make the clock reverse Bring back what once was mine Heal what has been hurt Change the Fates' design Save what has been lost Bring back what once was mine
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/02/20 03:40 AM
0

ze holly bibboel
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/02/20 03:34 AM
3

While the truth of this particular instance is dubious, behavior like this is a tried and true tactic of socialist governments
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/02/20 02:11 AM
18

In what ways has the reaction to Depp's plight been "swift"? It's taken literal years for him to be believed, even with mountains of actual evidence on his side.
/r/MensRights17/02/20 09:20 PM
6

I think it would be a non-issue if there were male-only cars too, or if women had to pay more for tickets for the greater amount of services they receive on account of their gender.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 10:50 PM
6

I know I said "lastly" before, but there's one other thing. I pointed out before that help for men (which is run almost exclusively by feminist organizations) is lacking, but I really want to drive home just how bad it is: Men who are abused and seek help from shelters and hotlines- --were told that the service was only for women (49.9% shelter / 63.9% hotline / 42.9% online) --were accused of being the abuser (40.2% shelter / 32.2% hotline / 18.9% online) --given a phone number for a men's serv…
/r/MensRights14/02/20 07:47 PM
6

Lastly, going to copy/paste something about the sheer scale of academic and political feminist duplicity. The topic comes up often so rather than simply going back and forth with "but what about" I'm just going to hand you this wall of text for you to go through at your own convenience. Part of the reason why people in general think that DV is almost exclusively a male perpetrated/female victim dynamic is because activists and reformers who support the idea of gender symmetry and contradict the …
/r/MensRights14/02/20 07:32 PM
8

Beware their attemps to pretend to address "male issues" like "not being able to express their feelings." In feminist circles, discussion of "not opening up emotionally" (which almost always segues into talking about "toxic masculinity") is the way they avoid addressing actual men's issues while picking a topic that they can surreptitiously blame on men themselves and therefore dismiss without any action or introspection.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 07:26 PM
5

Talk to academic feminists, people who actually study this stuff. These people are almost exclusively the problem. They're the hateful ones and they have government funding. I'd suggest that you talk to them and ask their positions on things they skillfully avoid addressing like the Duluth model (which they will be pretty much universally in support of), MGM (which they will nearly universally try to downplay), the wage gap (which they all believe in wholeheartedly despite being it debunked pret…
/r/MensRights14/02/20 06:56 PM
2

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/f3qqlg/13_accusers_36_alleged_crimes_17_alleged_crime/fhlplzc/
/r/MensRights14/02/20 06:09 PM
6

Copy-pasting this thing again: here isn't a single piece of "evidence" used to convict him that didn't have glaring flaws in it. A sexual assault nurse examiner test on Ligons, who claimed Holtzclaw forced her to put his penis in her mouth “for about 10 seconds,” (because that's how blowjobs work /s) came up empty for Holtzclaw’s DNA. Sex-crimes detective Kim Davis explained away the negative SANE results by noting that Ligons had told her that Holtzclaw “did not ejaculate.” But in the police in…
/r/MensRights14/02/20 05:59 PM
3

I'm so glad I'm single this time around.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 05:57 PM
1

You don't argue with them with the intent to change their minds. That's a pointless endeavor. What you should do is present your arguments for the people who may be listening or reading your conversation and your goal should be to display in their hypocrisy and narcissism to the audience in an easily understood manner. If you determine that they aren't just ignorant of men's struggles (which is totally possible given how completely feminist dogma dominates education and the media) but are aware …
/r/MensRights14/02/20 05:48 PM
2

I guess the words "feminism" and "patriarchy" are out too then. Same goes for "mansplaining", "manspreading", "toxic masculinity" and pretty much the entire feminist lexicon.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 05:29 PM
5

also in this story the wolf is paying the boy to send the villagers in the wrong direction.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/02/20 12:23 AM
2

It never even occurs to them to wonder what exactly he's doing at the same time. That's how it always works. See a woman in a situation they'd consider unpleasant, and they just assume that the nearest man is off smoking cigars in a monogrammed robe in the next room. See this DV shelter full of suffering women? This must truly the only real problem, after all there aren't any DV shelters full of men. Oh, also people who point out that there aren't any men's DV shelters for them to go to in the f…
/r/MensRights12/02/20 10:04 PM
1

if there are no witnesses then she could accuse you of rape. Being safe is more important than seeming too paranoid. They absolutely lose their shit when we do this though, and avoid one-on-one workplace discussions or mentoring.
/r/MensRights12/02/20 12:49 AM
5

Revenge on people who are dead who, more often than not, didn't actually do what they imagine, in fact.
/r/MensRights12/02/20 12:43 AM
13

Maybe you should reflect a bit and wonder, if someone gave you the choice between having a hard time caring for your family or just straight up being murdered on the spot... what would you choose?
/r/MensRights12/02/20 12:33 AM
4

1) It is talked about more in every place except men's rights focused places. 2) Even if it wasn't, that's perfectly fine because it's already illegal except for in a few open-air sewer countries (where MGM is also still legal). MGM is the bigger problem, by several orders of magnitude, and so even if were talked about more, that would make sense.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 06:36 PM
4

Historical note: The Halifax Explosion was the largest man-made explosion (at roughly 2.9 kilotons) until the Nuclear Trinity Tests in 1945.
/r/MGTOW04/02/20 04:09 PM
1

Anyone else notice the huge amount of things that should be financial crimes, but instead are completely legal when a woman does it to a man?
/r/MensRights02/02/20 06:35 PM
9

"I've used my institutional power to change the definition of institutional power so that only you can technically have it." Feminists.
/r/MensRights02/02/20 06:15 PM
15

your boss typically pays you though.
/r/MGTOW29/01/20 09:42 PM
20

6) Plot her revenge on you for making her admit she was wrong.
/r/MGTOW29/01/20 06:02 PM
4

Get a recording app on your phone. You never know when you'll need it.
/r/MGTOW28/01/20 11:55 PM
3

Just repeating the points that are made on here elsewhere would be a big help. When a man makes these points, they are often rejected simply because they are being made by a man, but as a woman, it takes that weapon; that excuse to ignore what's being said, out of our opponents arsenal.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 09:48 PM
3

well with the trajectory of Japan's total population numbers...
/r/MensRights28/01/20 09:45 PM
3

Although this is undoubtedly a women's group, I think they'd take issue with being referred to as feminists. I can't find a kind word on that site regarding feminism.
/r/MensRights28/01/20 09:39 PM
3

‘The future is male’ everyone would freak out A more comparable statement would be if someone wore a shirt that said "Deutschland uber Alles". The phrase "the future is female" was first uttered as an endorsement of literal, unambiguous genocide. "The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race." -- Sally Miller Gearhart, in The Future--If There Is One--Is Female. Anyone who utters it now should be informed of its origin, and if they continue to use…
/r/MensRights23/01/20 12:01 AM
1

When there's virtually no punishment for a false accusation, literally any petty reason for lying is conceivable. The idea that "a woman wouldn't make something up for such a small reason" is not valid in today's legal climate. Any potential gain to be had from such a lie overcomes the (nonexistent) risk of saying it.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 11:42 PM
8

Oh boy. This case drives me up the wall every time it comes up. I'll paste a compilation of the reasons for his innocence that I've collected over all the arguments I've had over this case. Not once has anyone ever tried to refute anything I've written. It just immediately descends into accusations of bootlicking and juvenile insults without a single instance of rebuttal. There isn't a single piece of evidence used to convict him that didn't have glaring flaws in it. A sexual assault nurse exami…
/r/MensRights22/01/20 10:46 PM
7

It doesn't matter how much you can bench press if she calls 911, and tells them enough of a sob story to get four cops and their German shepherd to show up to commit violence on her behalf.
/r/MensRights22/01/20 06:29 PM
4

8 The only true privilege is wealth. Gonna have to disagree there. While wealth can be associated with privilege, the two are not the same. Lets look at the definition: a special right, advantage, or immunity granted or available only to a particular person or group. From Middle English: via Old French from Latin privilegium ‘bill or law affecting an individual’, from privus ‘private’ + lex, leg- ‘law’. Private. Law. In other words if the law is different (and presumably more favorable) to you b…
/r/MensRights22/01/20 06:26 PM
3

and the men had to die in far greater numbers to achieve that right.
/r/MensRights20/01/20 10:32 PM
2

First few results that popped up. https://www.nerdwallet.com/blog/small-business/small-business-grants-for-women/ https://www.sba.gov/business-guide/grow-your-business/women-owned-businesses#section-header-2 Not so concerned about the privately run programs for women because it's their money to do with as they please, but the government programs (which seem to be far larger) are all taxpayer (therefore primarily male) funded.
/r/MensRights19/01/20 06:47 PM
6

Baseball lie. Man who has four balls cannot walk. Confucius.
/r/MGTOW17/01/20 04:48 AM
23

I fail to understand what difference it makes to the customer if the business is owned by a man or a woman. If its woman led there's a chance that the owner was handed a giant check and tax breaks from the government for that fact alone, so maybe the prices are a bit cheaper. Getting a giant check from the government solely because of your gender isn't privilege though. /s
/r/MensRights15/01/20 11:15 PM
2

It's honestly the biggest reason that there appears to be a discrepancy toward males committing domestic violence against women. If a woman wants to hurt a guy, not only can she do it herself, but she can count on the system itself to aid her in said violence. Then, not only does it not get recorded as an act of violence committed by a woman against a man but rather gets recorded as the exact opposite, leaving another data point where a "man assaulted a woman". Furthermore. When these statistics…
/r/MGTOW15/01/20 05:56 PM
1

Why do normal, decent looking dudes do this? Reaching escape velocity is hard.
/r/MGTOW13/01/20 06:42 PM
34

Restaurant forced to close once it becomes known that all their food is served pre-chewed. "I don't understand it. It's not like the food tastes any worse than before everyone knew."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/01/20 05:27 PM
3

Remember These are not simple machines that anyone can just "eyeball it" and figure out how to run it. ... The skills needed to keep these going aren't capable of being learned in the hours or days needed to prevent catastrophic failure, and of the few qualified personnel left, there are nowhere near enough to keep up with the repairs even if transportation was still working (which it isn't). so... Women aren't mute, you know. They can share that knowledge and skills. except not in the few days …
/r/MensRights06/01/20 06:56 PM
10

Do YOU want to work in sewage? Yes, actually. And it does pay good. Somebody would do it if they had to. but they don't. Societies where things like sanitation infrastructure are neglected by the men... don't have sanitation infrastructure. Holes in the ground, or the nearest river (which also doubles as your drinking water source) is the best you're going to get when the men step aside. When there's the business of making sure civilization actually happens, it's either men making it happen or n…
/r/MensRights05/01/20 11:04 PM
3

We really need to find a way to get those numbers for other countries.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 10:44 PM
12

Current gender breakdown of specific professions does not mean other people can't do it given the chance. You seem to be under the impression that women aren't allowed to work at sewage plants. "They don't have the chance!" It's not that they can't. It's that they generally won't. If it's not a corporate boardroom or elected office, feminists have no desire for gender-parity. Removing half the population, delimited by whatever you care to use, would be catastrophic. If all women vanished, but me…
/r/MensRights05/01/20 10:39 PM
13

Insightful. tell me more.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 10:16 PM
7

https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ekdypu/this_is_currently_trending_on_twitter_and_its_as/fda9hcn/ Now I will concede that assuming it's just one day, and then men went back to work the very next day to try to fix everything that broke, it'd probably be salvageable.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 06:10 PM
1

Especially when they lump divorced men into the "single men" category.
/r/MGTOW05/01/20 05:56 PM
4

Armstong eh?
/r/MGTOW05/01/20 05:49 PM
5

They're "poorer" because they can spend money that isn't theirs. They're counting full time house wives living in mansions among "the poor". the 50% of the food part is just completely made up though. The agricultural industry is something like 95% men, and the only aspect of it that even comes close to gender parity is at the cash register of the grocery store.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 05:07 PM
82

Imagine that men simply vanished one day. Even if the remaining women still had some way to reproduce: Men are, for all intents and purposes, 100% of power plant operators, distributors, and dispatchers. 91% of the nation’s electrical engineers are men and 97.6% of electrical power line installers and maintenance workers are men. 95.5% of water and liquid waste treatment plant and system operators are men. 95.9% of aircraft pilots and flight engineers are men. 98.4% of aircraft mechanics and ser…
/r/MensRights05/01/20 04:54 PM
19

one day men stay home this would have to be the second one because chances are it would literally cause civilization to cease.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 04:48 PM
1

Imagine if some German politician decided to use "Deutschland uber Alles!" as their campaign slogan. You're basically the person defending that, saying that they couldn't have possibly known what it meant and that even if they did, they clearly meant it in another, nicer way. "The Future is Female" is a term that is utterly inseparable from it's gender-supremacist roots, and anyone making use of it is either ignorant of its origin, or is at least somewhat supportive of it. There is no third opti…
/r/MensRights04/01/20 06:54 PM
3

The group most likely to be injured in a physically demanding job, and to then be prescribed painkillers afterward.
/r/MensRights04/01/20 02:31 AM
9

And then the next time the tall guy, who brought all the boxes the first time, simply doesn't bother.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 11:54 PM
6

... and then the people who work in those companies will move with them, and they'll vote for the same damn policies in whatever state they move to, bringing those same problems with them.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 06:02 PM
7

with the same help being virtually absent for men. a total lack of help would actually be an improvement for men's situation. As it stands now the systems in place work to actively harm men who are already victims that try to seek help. A man calling the police to report his abuser is more likely to end up in jail than the person he called to report.
/r/MensRights31/12/19 05:09 PM
1

Hi, New Here. I'm dad.
/r/MensRights30/12/19 05:18 PM
2

The same solution we told white people when they were afraid of being on the same public transportation as black people. Tell them to go fuck themselves and deal with it.
/r/MensRights18/12/19 07:58 PM
5

Feminists say that they're the good ones and that they want the same things we do, but when the push comes to shove and the MRM actually manages to make some headway on the issues men face (alimony reform, DV reform, suicide etc) the only feminists that make an appearance are the ones standing in opposition, and with taxpayer dollars helping them to do it. Any other feminist is, more or less, irrelevant because they don't do anything except run interference whenever the topic of systemic feminis…
/r/MensRights17/12/19 07:46 PM
34

"I wonder what the barrel of a shotgun tastes like."
/r/MGTOW16/12/19 11:56 PM
3

As much as I despise what today's funhouse mirror version of marriage does to men, some men (like the tradcon featured above) absolutely deserve to have it inflicted upon them so that they be made to understand the situation. "Oh, your darling infallible angel? Yeah, she was polishing the pastor's knob after service while you were gloating to us. Oh, yeah, and if you make too much of a fuss about it, she's getting your house."
/r/MGTOW16/12/19 08:20 PM
1

Yeah. Johnathan Swift wasn't enthusiastically advocating for eating Irish babies.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 05:51 PM
2

Society really needs to get past the idea that "needing" something is not the same thing as deserving to have it.
/r/MGTOW03/12/19 05:49 PM
1

Women whining about receiving too much unwanted attention to guys who receive no attention at all is like a billionaire complaining to a homeless person about how difficult the tax code is.
/r/MGTOW03/12/19 05:43 PM
1

These people can legally adopt, and then groom that child until it "becomes trans". There's nothing genetic about it and the gene pool never comes into play. It's a cycle of abuse.
/r/MGTOW03/12/19 05:38 PM
7

Nobody thinks all men are rapists and abusers Nobody eh? Are you sure you don't want to do a quick google search of prominent and influential feminists before you start throwing out absolute statements like that?
/r/MensRights03/12/19 05:09 PM
22

99% sure this book is satire of the Modest Proposal variety.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 04:52 PM
5

Doubtful. You're assuming that transportation or communication systems would be working/exist in the first place.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 03:04 AM
2

Not all feminists believe that way. just the ones that matter. The only time the feminists "who aren't like that" show up is to run interference for the feminists who most certainly are like that.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 01:35 AM
3

Teen pregnancy would plummet. One girl has sex with 100 guys... how many pregnancies can result? One guy has sex with 100 girls... how many pregnancies can result? From a practical standpoint, if you want to reduce teenage pregnancies, the efforts would get much better results from "reversible" female sterilization as opposed to male.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 01:33 AM
4

We will not allow posts that do not directly correlate to the topic of men’s rights, and mention of feminism will be kept to a minimum. This is like starting a fitness subreddit where no one is allowed to use the word "diet."
/r/MensRights03/12/19 01:29 AM
4

By that logic, slavery never existed in the US at all because there was always some place they could (attempt to) run to.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 01:07 AM
10

Victimhood gives you power. Note that you do not actually have to be a victim of anything to have this status bestowed upon you.
/r/MensRights03/12/19 01:01 AM
1

we do remember cartman is supposed to be a horrible human being right? Well yeah, but only because for some truthful messages, the creators would be crucified if they didn't do a little plausible CYA with Cartman's dubious personality. He's there specifically because they can always say "you know he's a horrible person in the show" if they start getting more than the usual flak while they're over the target.
/r/MGTOW03/12/19 12:18 AM
1

It's exceedingly rare, but it does happen occasionally, though the man always receives far less from the woman than if the genders of the payer/payee were reversed.
/r/MGTOW03/12/19 12:14 AM
5

Unrealistic. You need to add about 50 lbs to picture number 2.
/r/MGTOW02/12/19 05:53 PM
9

The beauty and charm of British women has always inspired British men to become the world's best sailors.
/r/MensRights02/12/19 05:38 PM
4

I don't think we're condoning violence, but rather expressing doubt about whether or not it actually happened. If it did happen then obviously that's bad.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen02/12/19 04:09 PM
4

Gibs me stoff.
/r/MGTOW25/11/19 01:49 AM
48

You could have just said "Lularoe."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/11/19 07:46 PM
4

"Could having one's entire livelihood ripped away followed by a guarantee of years of involuntary servitude and state-imposed poverty cause severe depression? Science may soon have an answer!"
/r/MensRights20/11/19 07:11 PM
13

The general gist is that all three groups sort-of agree on things but wildly disagree on what actions should be taken. Broadly: MRAs want to change the system. TRP wants to subvert the system. MGTOW wants to distance itself from the system altogether.
/r/MensRights20/11/19 07:07 PM
1

The UN website went out of their way to celebrate "International Toilet Day" on the same day. Imagine what would happen if they decided to make make "International Women's Day" and "International Dishwasher Day" the same day...
/r/MGTOW20/11/19 06:09 PM
6

Some of the biggest voices in the movement are women. It's kinda necessary too, since it's so easy for feminists to tell others to dismiss MRA arguments from men simply because they come from men.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 12:54 AM
8

Trolly troll troll.
/r/MensRights19/11/19 12:43 AM
7

Don't kill yourself over a girl. She'll bring another dude to the funeral.
/r/MGTOW18/11/19 10:31 PM
14

I hope they keep the same energy when I mock their college debt in a few years They're currently lobbying furiously to have the net taxpayer (you, the guy who didn't go to college) pay off their college debt.
/r/MGTOW18/11/19 05:41 PM
58

...and two of the other chambers are loaded with blanks. Sure they might not kill you, but it's not fun. The last chamber is empty and only leaves you off as well as if you hadn't pulled the trigger in the first place.
/r/MGTOW13/11/19 03:41 PM
1

It does tend to get a better reception if you don't use all the usual buzzwords.
/r/MGTOW12/11/19 05:33 PM
1

Let's be honest. No one is running from her. At most they're doing a light jog.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen07/11/19 03:41 PM
3

I've been delivering for Uber Eats in the evenings and been making some pretty good coin. Same. After my regular job, I found that even after exercise and housework I still had a bunch of time left over... to do nothing. I do my deliveries in a car, but I'm still moving around plenty and, more importantly, not playing video games with a beer in my hand. I mess around with duolingo in the lulls between deliveries. You discover some pretty neat hole-in-the-wall restaurants doing it too.
/r/MGTOW05/11/19 06:13 PM
8

Well if we're going by feminist standards, where anyone who's gotten hit in the nuts counts as "sexually assaulted" then yeah, I'd be surprised if anyone wasn't "sexually assaulted."
/r/MensRights05/11/19 05:53 PM
1

Well if you're going to start your movie by taking a big wet shit on the one movie of the franchise that everyone actually liked...
/r/MGTOW04/11/19 04:59 PM
1

Ok, now do it with a Zimbabwe Dollar.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen31/10/19 02:24 PM
2

"Why were you in a situation where someone could accuse you?" "Hmm, you make a valid point. I shall avoid those situations. No more one-on-one mentoring or work functions with the opposite sex without witnesses." "Wait. No. That's sexist."
/r/MensRights31/10/19 02:07 PM
2

Tall, dark, and handsome... white guy. Whut
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/10/19 04:05 PM
2

Little pro-tip. If you want a suit, I highly recommend thrift shopping it up. Most of the people who go there aren't exactly the types to wear suits regularly, so these perfectly good jackets and dress pants just keep on piling up. You can end up getting some high end stuff and then go to a tailor, who is usually right next door, to get it fitted. End result is that after a few days you look exactly the same as someone who's spent several hundred dollars getting a custom suit, but you've probabl…
/r/MGTOW29/10/19 10:44 PM
9

A caveat to that. If it's just you and them with no one else reading or listening, then "ok retard" is fine, because you're never going to get through to them. However, if there is an audience of any kind, you need to explain things because it's far more likely that they're reasonable people.
/r/MensRights28/10/19 02:37 PM
13

Shes wondering why guys leave after a hookup after meeting them on a website designed exclusively for facilitating casual hookups...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/10/19 02:32 PM
4

Sheet. I's pragernat agayn.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen28/10/19 02:29 PM
1

Taking bets on whether or not Florida makes the boy pay child support to his rapist.
/r/MensRights27/10/19 11:05 PM
2

But why would they ever pair bond with the first guy at all? Because when times are not chaotic and the men survive longer, the woman sticking with the first man tends to result in better chances of success for the offspring. Women who failed to pair bond in less chaotic times would lose the support of the man who could no longer be sure that the children were indeed his and therefore those children would be far less likely to survive long enough to reproduce themselves. So therefore there's evo…
/r/MGTOW24/10/19 10:29 PM
4

magnetic bracelets?
/r/MensRights23/10/19 09:08 PM
49

His wife has a particularly aggressive form of kidney cancer, which in turn led him to rely on some anti-anxiety medications, which turned out to be a tad addictive.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 09:03 PM
1

Because there's a chance that you'll pay for their food if they whine about it.
/r/MGTOW23/10/19 04:31 PM
2

r/comedyhomicide second panel is completely unnecessary.
/r/MGTOW23/10/19 02:26 PM
9

"You need to grow up so you can treat me like I'm a child for the rest of my life, even though I will insist that you respect me like the adult that I have no intention of behaving like."
/r/MGTOW23/10/19 02:21 PM
20

If you're a woman who owns or is starting a business, the government will literally hand you a pile of money simply because you are a woman. All you have to do is ask. If that isn't an example of systemic privilege, then the term is effectively meaningless.
/r/MensRights23/10/19 02:10 PM
31

Not one of them even comes close to the realization that it's their own damn fault. You bimbos wanted every aspect of a man's contribution to a relationship to be a legal and social minefield, and now you've got it. Every man in a relationship that has an ounce of self-preservation instinct has his hand hovering over the "eject" button because every last one of you harpies is an oblivious walking liability through your own choices.
/r/MGTOW22/10/19 08:48 PM
3

If it's ok for you to mistreat someone in a way that would not be ok for them to mistreat you... they aren't the ones experiencing privilege.
/r/MensRights22/10/19 07:13 PM
2

If it were just stigma and shame that would actually be an improvement. As it stands right now though it's actually legally more dangerous to report it, because of arrest policies, than it is to simply keep quiet. Just being ignored or sneered at would actually be an improvement on the status quo for men.
/r/MensRights22/10/19 05:53 PM
2

Legal rights: Women have the right to genital integrity Women have the right to vote and work in the public sector without agreeing to involuntary servitude in the military. Women have the right to choose when they want to become parents. (Postulate that men should be able to say no to legal parenthood after copulation and formerly "pro choice" individuals instantly morph into die hard tradcons.) Legal Advantages: Gargantuan legally provided advantages in Family Court All levels of education (th…
/r/MensRights22/10/19 05:26 PM
8

https://www.youtube.com/user/girlwriteswhat peruse at your earliest convenience.
/r/MensRights22/10/19 04:59 PM
2

Learn to drink your coffee black, or if you must, put in just a bit of skim milk to cool it down/even out the taste.
/r/MGTOW17/10/19 03:27 PM
12

She's just looking in the wrong places. I bet she hasn't looked under a single bridge.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/10/19 12:28 PM
16

Like others are saying here. Record everything and try not to react. If a woman chips a fingernail while bashing a man in the head with a frying pan, he's going to be the one in cuffs unless he has hard evidence that shows her to be the aggressor, and even then the police might just arrest him anyway because that's what their policies tell them to do. Girls haven't physically or psychologically changed in recent decades, but what has happened is that violent tendencies in girls growing up are no…
/r/MensRights14/10/19 10:24 PM
1

Since no one else has pointed it out... Orc nose.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/10/19 07:45 PM
2

Buy some generic cheerios or whatever one feeds children these days "Kid-Chow" Now, with flavor!
/r/MGTOW14/10/19 06:32 PM
2

Having a ton of girlfriends these days can potentially mean having just two girlfriends.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/10/19 05:38 PM
1

China is a communist country that was grudgingly forced by reality to permit a small amount of capitalism to avoid starving to death. Since then they've implemented some more limited capitalist reforms (reforms that took off after they got Hong Kong back from the British and realized how hilariously far behind they were by comparison) that have allowed for some degree of private ownership, which has resulted in a great deal of wealth for those allowed to partake, but at it's core it is still com…
/r/MensRights14/10/19 05:14 PM
21

"But why would she lie?" literally any reason, or none at all.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 05:07 PM
4

moobs intesify.
/r/MGTOW14/10/19 04:02 PM
35

1 year later: Family photograph with the mom clearly giddy at having a new "daughter" standing beside the father with a thousand yard stare out of dead eyes, clearly wondering what the muzzle of a shotgun tastes like.
/r/MGTOW14/10/19 04:00 PM
1

she has her reasons
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/10/19 03:18 PM
6

Chest tat basically a billboard that says "I have no self-control whatsoever"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen14/10/19 03:15 PM
6

Crabs in a bucket. God forbid someone not have the same shitty attitude and behavior as the rest of them.
/r/MensRights14/10/19 03:09 PM
12

Women have outnumbered men in higher education since 1983. It's been a long time since gender-specific education programs have been justified. Currently, the imbalance in favor of women is greater than the imbalance in favor of men that inspired the passage of Title IX, but the pile of government-sponsored educational freebies for women only just keeps getting bigger.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 02:48 PM
7

"Behind every great man stands appears a strong woman." ftfy
/r/MensRights11/10/19 02:44 PM
3

Defend yourself, but be aware of your surroundings. See those potential white knights there? You aren't going to win against all of them when they decide to protect m'lady's honor. If they weren't there, sure, feed her her own teeth, but always remember that the primary way that women abuse men is through others acting on her behalf. If you're only paying attention to her, you're going to get blindsided.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 04:35 PM
3

More of a socialist retard. Tautology, yo.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen09/10/19 03:11 PM
26

arrested Female abuse of males, more often than not, gets recorded officially as male abuse of females because of arrest policies, which in turn result in statistics that justify those arrest policies that aid in female abuse of males.
/r/MensRights09/10/19 12:35 AM
4

I find that whenever this is said about 3rd world countries it's only because the women in those countries have it worse than men in 1st world countries. The comparison to the men who actually live in those countries is never even contemplated, and their status over women is simply assumed to be superior.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 06:50 PM
6

It was a trick question. A female-on-male rape would not even be considered a crime in the first place in these countries, so the number of witnesses is moot.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 06:49 PM
1

Women don't even need to save up for 20 years. They can just legally take the money that their guy saved up for 20 years, jump ship, all while the majority of society cheers them on, telling them that they're strong, empowered, and good for doing so, and god help anyone who says otherwise in public.
/r/MGTOW07/10/19 07:29 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/user/girlwriteswhat
/r/MensRights30/09/19 07:20 PM
8

Huh, come to think of it, I've been drinking way less since I broke up with my last gf.
/r/MensRights30/09/19 07:12 PM
1

Like, let’s say even if climate change was a lie, and everything’s fine, what could it hurt to take a bit better care of our planet? It's the worldwide totalitarian government with total control over all aspects of human industry that people tend to have a problem with. "Saving the planet" is just the excuse and could just as easily be accomplished by easing up on anti-nuclear power regulations.
/r/MGTOW30/09/19 07:03 PM
12

Literal embodiment of the Tragedy of the Commons.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/09/19 08:18 PM
2

I wouldn't be surpised if this is the most common way that women abuse men. The statistics, of course, cannot be relied upon because every time a woman abuses a man this way, it gets recorded as a man abusing a woman.
/r/MensRights29/09/19 01:59 PM
2

If fresh fruit and vegetables are an issue for you remember that frozen or canned ones do almost all of the same things, with the added bonus of not going bad nearly as fast. Lean towards vegetables though. Sugar is still sugar even if it's in its natural state.
/r/MGTOW26/09/19 06:46 PM
1

Just treat it like any other vegetable and don't go hipster-level crazy with it and it's fine.
/r/MGTOW26/09/19 06:42 PM
30

They're so used to the privilege of having someone else be forced to support them financially that it never even occurs to them that it's not a natural occurrence. So when someone suggests that maybe that shouldn't be the status quo, they react in the same way you or I would if someone proposed taxing the air we breathe.
/r/MensRights26/09/19 04:12 PM
2

Hey now, no criticizing Woke Honey Booboo, you racist sexist infidels.
/r/MGTOW26/09/19 12:27 AM
3

Shabu Shabu to you too.
/r/MGTOW25/09/19 06:19 PM
4

civilians ... including other Nobel peace prize winners.
/r/MGTOW25/09/19 06:04 PM
1

"I don't understand how that man allowed any of that to happen" Because if he makes too much of a fuss he loses his kids and home too and would have to pay for the "privilege" of having all of this inflicted on him.
/r/MensRights25/09/19 04:31 PM
1

The bull is put there to represent wealth, progress, and a general increase in wellbeing... to which the girl (representing feminism) is standing in opposition. Also, the bull statue was put there by an actual independent artist, while the girl statue was a corporate stunt as a part of an ad campaign. So essentially we have a giant corporation "defiantly" standing up against a lone individual.
/r/MGTOW19/09/19 04:32 PM
3

If you have to be pushed to be a venture capitalist by someone else, you aren't going to be a good venture capitalist.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 04:04 PM
26

What's your sign? I'm a space lobster and that means I can work with star gerbils but I have trouble getting along with cosmic spatulas.
/r/MGTOW09/09/19 09:09 PM
1

Anyone who says they have a "ton" of girlfriends these days needs to realize that can mean something like two girlfriends.
/r/MGTOW09/09/19 12:38 PM
3

...like a gummy bear left in a hot car all day.
/r/MGTOW09/09/19 12:37 PM
32

She looked like a typical UK woman to me. I'll have you know that the beauty of British women has always inspired British men to become the world's greatest sailors.
/r/MGTOW08/09/19 07:40 PM
1

"Only strong men can meekly acquiesce to my every demand, no matter how unreasonable."
/r/MGTOW06/09/19 04:32 PM
12

Anglerfish. Read it's wiki and tell me it's not the perfect mascot for the modern woman.
/r/MGTOW05/09/19 09:54 PM
2

It's not the meeting that's the problem, it's the extortion afterwards, you prostitute.
/r/MGTOW05/09/19 09:44 PM
5

Literally no one here would have a single issue with him doing it to himself of his own free will. Consent is the issue.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 11:36 PM
17

White knight: This is fake feminism. Real feminists like me don't support this. Us: Ok, here are some changes that will minimize this type of thing. Repercussions for false accusers, etc. White Knight: No, we can't do any of that because reasons. "Real feminists" may decry the actions of "fake feminists" but when it comes down to it, they'll never allow action to be taken against whatever those "fake feminists" are up to.
/r/MGTOW04/09/19 08:37 PM
8

Except there isn't any benefit to getting rid of fingernails. I just pointed it out. Over my lifetime I've probably saved at least 15 minutes of digging dirt out from under them. Also clipping nails... that just sounds dangerous. Glad I don't have to deal with that.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 05:51 PM
12

Hey man, I know what you mean. When I was born my parents made sure the doctors pulled out all my fingernails for my benefit. I've saved so much time not having to clean under them. It's really for the best and people who get upset about it really just need to calm down.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 05:27 PM
8

"But men get arrested for it more!" Yeah, because if she chips her fingernail while hitting you in the head with a frying pan, you're the one who's going to be arrested, and the statistics get recorded that way.
/r/MensRights04/09/19 05:22 PM
3

Yep. Tax breaks on money that isn't really yours anymore.
/r/MGTOW04/09/19 03:45 PM
1

4 is 4 more than the zero I expected to be available to men, so maybe that's progress. It's more than likely a set of scholarships for a very specific set of men, rather than a scholarship for men in general. Better than nothing, but still pretty close.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 11:19 PM
3

When men were snarkily told to "be vigilant" as a way to deal with false rape accusations... men actually did that. Now the feminists are complaining about that too.
/r/MensRights02/09/19 10:59 PM
3

Pro-tip. If your particular brand of bigotry is more socially and legally acceptable than other types... then that's the type of bigotry with the power behind it. This stupid fucking "power + prejudice" definition is self-negating.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 11:00 PM
5

Sarah Connor is the gold standard for having a strong female lead being built up from nothing. It's done almost completely passively and takes up barely any effort or screen time, but the justification for how she got where she was by the beginning of T2 didn't seem outlandish or unbelievable at all.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 04:51 PM
3

"Benevolent sexism" is simply a word that feminists used to describe privilege when it happens to women.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 04:40 PM
2

Then why not companies can just keep their own test for job profiles where demanding skills are required more than college grades? Candidates who pass the test get the job. Literally illegal in most cases. A company that administers their own standards for entry is walking on very thin ice. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Griggs_v._Duke_Power_Co. If a test results in a "biased" outcome it's "discriminatory" regardless of what the test consisted of.
/r/MensRights28/08/19 04:36 PM
2

True. My point wasn't that you should avoid doing that for yourself, but rather that it's not cool to sign someone else up for that type of emotional commitment/burden when they have specifically requested that you not do that.
/r/MGTOW27/08/19 06:03 PM
7

"Eagles may fly high but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines."
/r/MGTOW26/08/19 10:34 PM
69

Dad doesn't want the dog because he knows he'll love it unconditionally for years and then he'll be the one that has to take it to the vet that last time. If dad doesn't want a dog and you get one for him anyway, you've essentially signed him up to personally kill his best friend in 12-15 years.
/r/MGTOW26/08/19 10:28 PM
2

Need =/= deserve
/r/MensRights26/08/19 03:11 PM
4

There is a tad of truth in that bigotry though. Cultures that allowed for bigamy dealt with their excess unmarried men by using them as fodder for warfare, sending them to neighboring lands to pillage, or die trying. Failing to cull those men from those societies usually meant that those in power would be toppled sooner rather than later. These cultures were supposedly patriarchal and set up entirely for the benefit of men if feminists are to be believed.
/r/MensRights22/08/19 04:26 PM
104

The elephant in the room: The overwhelming majority of guys would be ok with a girl who is taller than them, but those guys are also keenly aware that the chances of that taller girl also being ok with the height difference is pretty close to zero and that any effort or money put into courting those women is going to result in nothing a best, and a vicious, mocking rejection usually. So he saves his messages and money for attempts at romantic endeavors with a better chance of success. There is n…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen20/08/19 04:33 PM
6

Kinda hard to pretend that one is going their own way when they're utterly dependent on men one way or the other, either directly or through the state.
/r/MensRights20/08/19 02:30 PM
3

If you think one form of genital mutilation is somehow less bad than the other, you don't have principles, you have preferences.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 06:31 AM
12

last website visited: google, search for "male DV shelters near me". 0 results found.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 06:28 AM
1

Nah. the right to bear arms sans infringement is given to the people, not to the militia (which is made of of parts of "the people"). In other words while the formation and regulation of the milita requires that the people be armed, the arming of the people is in no way restricted to merely those who participate in the militia. That being said. Compulsory participation in the militia or any kind of military force just for men is bullshit.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 12:43 AM
2

I was several stories up and the bartender told me it was unsafe to intervene pretty good chance that it's some variety of "distressed stranger" scam. They're quite common. White knights beware.
/r/MensRights19/08/19 12:30 AM
4

The problem isn't the mere portrayal of these acts being done, but rather the movie is going to portray them as righteous or justified somehow. Feminists love to get butthurt about any time a rape occurs in any type of media even when it's portrayed almost always as a villainous act (except when being done against men of course, then it's played up for the ha hahs).
/r/MensRights19/08/19 12:24 AM
3

"But enough of me talking about how great I am, why don't you talk about how great I am."
/r/MensRights19/08/19 12:18 AM
1

some boomers. The voices of caution were there in that generation too, but the spendy ones had the majority and got to set fiscal policy. The boomers who everyone hears nowadays are the ones who were warning about what would happen all along, and are now saying "told you so". The ones who voted to run up the debt and set the stage for all of the housing and student loan nonsense are laying low. Edit: Keep in mind also. Every one of us will be old at some point. At eventually we're going to be th…
/r/MGTOW18/08/19 09:59 PM
4

"The proportion of men must be reduced to and maintained at approximately 10% of the human race." -- Sally Miller Gearhart, in The Future--If There Is One--Is Female If you hear someone say the phrase above, they are expressing a statement of unironic gender supremacy. The graffiti above is the moral equivalent of a swastika.
/r/MGTOW15/08/19 03:37 PM
2

The elephant in the room: If a woman wants to lash out at the world and harm those around her indiscriminately there are multitudes of entirely legal as well as socially acceptable ways for her to do so. Couple this with the fact that women and girls have access to far more assistance at the public's expense than men and boys (even though men and boys are paying the lion's share of the taxes that make that assistance possible) and it's no surprise that men are the ones who reach their wits end a…
/r/MensRights14/08/19 02:38 PM
7

The only time the "good" feminists show up is to run interference any time the behavior of the "bad" feminists (with billions in taxpayer funding) is noted.
/r/MensRights14/08/19 02:35 PM
2

I've actually spent a fair amount of time trying to track this down for the US. As far as I can tell, those numbers simply don't exist, or of they do, they're not available for the rest of us to peruse.
/r/MensRights07/08/19 08:38 PM
3

The space-time around them is curvy.
/r/MensRights04/08/19 04:51 PM
2

It's surprisingly easy when you don't have to deal with a few hundred extra pounds of baggage.
/r/MGTOW01/08/19 09:13 PM
2

Funny how "best needs of the child" go right out the window when it might impose some kind of obligation on the mother. Father has to live in a roach infested studio apartment to pay for kids he never gets to see? ... "Think of the children!" Mother has to spend 5 minutes a day to verify that the money is actually spent on things the kid needs?... "We shouldn't punish mothers for having children!"
/r/MGTOW01/08/19 08:14 PM
3

What Went Wrong With Title IX? It was passed in the first place.
/r/MensRights30/07/19 01:44 AM
2

Who wants to bed that this guy brought up his own, supposedly good, marriage in response to the other guy complaining about marriage first. Survivors bias.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 07:14 PM
3

Men's lib is like a weight loss sub where no one is allowed to use the word "diet".
/r/MensRights24/07/19 07:11 PM
5

space-time gets "curvy" around her.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/07/19 05:48 PM
1

Not here to be your ever other weekend FWB or booty call. Well, not me specifically, but you're definitely going to end up as someone's.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen23/07/19 05:44 PM
7

bragplaining
/r/MGTOW21/07/19 01:47 AM
5

Routinely ignored by the courts especially in the case where the prenup does what it is supposed to do. It's a catch 22. If a prenup works for it's intended purposes, that's usually the reason it's invalidated.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 12:49 PM
8

Apparently things here got linked to somewhere else. Expect the up/down votes to not make much sense in this one.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen17/07/19 03:10 PM
2

"I've heard a hundred different variations of instances of unadulterated female victimhood, yet the silence of the feminists is deafening. Where two pieties--feminism and multi-culturalism--come into conflict, the only way of preserving both is an indecent silence." Theodore Darymple
/r/MGTOW16/07/19 08:41 PM
5

They'll still find a way to blame men.
/r/MGTOW15/07/19 09:48 PM
3

"Hello fellow MRAs. I think that MRAs, of which I am one, should distance ourselves from the people who have been our most consistent supporters. Who's with me?!"
/r/MensRights15/07/19 02:33 PM
1

Sure, it's "equal" but it would have been nice to have it be "equal" in a more reasonable manner. This seems a tad draconian. So on one hand, this is "good" in that it'll help people realize that maybe these punishment's are disproportionate since it's happening to a woman instead of a man, but it's still bad that it has to happen in the first place to anyone. One instance of being gross and grabby shouldn't land someone on a permanent "do not employ" list regardless of their gender (community s…
/r/MensRights11/07/19 08:20 PM
3

You can't make this shit up! Actually, making it up is easier than ever since any ridiculous story you make up will just blend in with all the equally ridiculous real-life occurrences. In a world where "man-spreading" is seen as a serious problem, worthy of national attention, any made-up activism story that is equally ridiculous will seem entirely plausible.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 03:15 PM
17

It's an extortion ring disguised as a human rights organization. "Nice business/club/group you've got there. It would be a shame if someone... accused you of being bigots, wouldn't it? How would you feel about some insurance that that kind of thing won't happen, eh?"
/r/MensRights11/07/19 03:12 PM
8

She's a sandy hook truther Gonna need a source on this one.
/r/MensRights11/07/19 03:07 PM
12

Men's players received a total of about $350 million during out of approximately $4 billion generated by the world cup. Women's players received a total of about $10 million of a total of about $70 million generated by the world cup. Even if every last dollar of the women's world cup money was given to the players there would still be a shortfall of roughly $180 million dollars. They literally want money they had no hand in generating. It's pure entitlement.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 05:42 PM
4

"Men just need to cry more" is now the default cop-out for anyone who wants to deflect about the actual issues men face. I can think of a single issue the MRM deals with that could be solved by "being more emotionally available" he might as well be telling us that the power of rainbows will make everything better.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 05:34 PM
2

They can travel across Europe with little to no budget because their ankles are in the air almost the entire time.
/r/MGTOW03/07/19 08:30 PM
14

don't google this at work BTW.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/07/19 05:25 PM
2

As forensic science improves, we're learning how fantastically bad witness testimony is, even when the witnesses don't have a reason to lie. Fact of the matter is that it's not at all difficult to come up with multiple "witnesses" who will corroborate a total falsehood.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 04:42 PM
1

justification It's easy. Something that hurts women is ok as long as it hurts men more.
/r/MensRights01/07/19 04:25 PM
2

When privilege backfires... They all wanted the power to make a male colleague disappear with naught but a single accusation, and they got it. Now they're upset that the monkey's paw granted them their wish.
/r/MGTOW01/07/19 03:01 PM
1

Nah, it'll be a long slow slide. Most people won't notice, as institutions succumb to entropy and bloat over the course of decades.
/r/MGTOW27/06/19 03:47 PM
1

If that were legal, sure. Sounds like a win for all parties actually involved.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 07:44 PM
2

It's ex post facto cuckoldry, even if it works out.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 03:43 PM
1

Even though the likelihood of it is rare, the fact that there is no real defense against it is why you need to guard yourself. The systems that should ideally be there to protect you against this stuff are the very things used to harm you in the first place.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 03:39 PM
1

It's depressing to know that the false accusation is now a routine part of the political cycle.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 03:37 PM
3

"It is actually viewed as an attractive female characteristic to be bad with money." WTF. Who thinks this? At best it's something that is tolerated in lieu of other qualities.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 03:34 PM
2

How much do you want to bet that the "protection" she is talking about is the average non-insane person asking for actual evidence that the crime occurred before dishing out punishment, legally or otherwise.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 03:32 PM
12

There's a ton of crimes that the average person thinks of as being mainly committed against women mainly because it never even occurs to them to ask about the men, and even when they're aware of what's happening to men, it's difficult for them to process that the crime is just as severe as when it occurs to a woman. bringbackourgirls
/r/MensRights26/06/19 03:27 PM
12

A woman who has spent her life enjoying the use of sexuality as a power play sees diminishing returns on that behavior as she ages. A false accusation is a way to get one last hit of that type of rush.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 03:24 PM
19

It's the same for me. On the off chance that you had parents with a good relationship, all it does is make it even more evident how rare that type of thing is.
/r/MGTOW26/06/19 02:56 PM
2

Bring on the leather chairs, monogrammed robes, and old-timey globes with bourbon hidden in them.
/r/MGTOW25/06/19 09:25 PM
2

Yeah, if you want it to show up to the wrong address.
/r/MGTOW25/06/19 09:10 PM
2

There's also the Welch's "Tough as Grapes" campaign, which is hilariously incongruent with the gynocentrism expected of that sort of product advertising. on the topic of weirdly aggressive grape juice commercials
/r/MensRights25/06/19 09:06 PM
2

Fun fact: While the overall divorce rate hovers around 50%, the rate of divorce for couples where at least one of the partners is on their third marriage is 85%. It's reverse Russian roulette. 5 of the 6 chambers are loaded.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen25/06/19 06:27 PM
2

If the ritual of circumcision had never been invented in the first place, and then someone, today, tried to shop around for doctors to perform the procedure, we'd have them institutionalized.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 04:18 PM
2

I wish I shared his optimism.
/r/MGTOW23/06/19 05:56 PM
2

Agree with everyone else here. "Emotional Support": she says you need to open up more, so at best, you tell her some trifling, surface-level concern of yours to placate her, because you know that if you really opened up she'd be gone in an instant with half your stuff. "Sex": Diminishing returns the longer the relationship goes on, assuming that it didn't stop the instant kids appear, and on the off chance that it does keep going at a regular rate, there's good odds that it'll be with a person o…
/r/MGTOW23/06/19 05:53 PM
1

If one subset of people is allowed to mistreat a second subset of people in a way that the second subset would not be allowed to mistreat the first... guess which group has the "power imbalance" in their favor.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 10:22 PM
1

While we're on the topic of useless PowerPoint training that wastes everyone's time.
/r/MensRights20/06/19 08:06 PM
0

I want to see how they reached these numbers. This looks suspiciously similar to the 1 in 4 women are abused trope and we know how those numbers were baked.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 10:13 PM
14

"Hey, I know finding the house you want is difficult, but have you considered these amazing cardboard boxes and dumpsters? Why narrow down your options unnecessarily?"
/r/MGTOW18/06/19 06:47 PM
21

Aziz Ansari got accused of as much simply because he didn't anticipate his date's (shitty) choice of wine at dinner. There is literally no motive too petty to assume that it couldn't motivate a woman to accuse someone of rape. Even boredom is a relatively common motivator.
/r/MGTOW18/06/19 06:21 PM
1

This seems... made up. My troll sense is tingling.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 05:35 PM
2

Well duh. I won't be thrown in prison if I don't do enough situps.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 05:33 PM
2

Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. 13th amendment. If it sounds like it should be prohibited by the amendment to the constitution that outlawed slavery, it's probably slavery.
/r/MensRights18/06/19 03:40 PM
2

"Think of the children" "A child is stuck paying child support." "...Noticing these things is misogynist."
/r/MensRights18/06/19 03:37 PM
1

Yup. You can spend hours reading the mainstream news or you can avoid reading the news entirely and these days both options are just as likely to leave you uninformed about the world, but one option saves quite a bit more time.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 08:02 PM
1

It's worth remembering. Any progress made on this issue was made in spite of feminist activism, not because of it. If things ever become fair, expect feminists to attempt to take credit for it like it was their idea the entire time while ignoring the fact that their only true "contribution" their constant fight against this reform the entire way.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 07:42 PM
1

They do see it. They're just liars.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 03:35 PM
3

The "oppressed" now have the right to demand that they not even be gazed upon by their "oppressors" lest it somehow sully them.
/r/MGTOW13/06/19 04:13 PM
2

I only hope that one day I'll have the self esteem of a middle aged woman on welfare.
/r/MGTOW13/06/19 04:07 PM
15

Men: "I don't want to cross the minefield. I think the reasons should be obvious." Feminists: "Quit whining, just don't step on the mines you big baby."
/r/MGTOW12/06/19 02:22 AM
5

It's definitely a parody account.
/r/MGTOW12/06/19 02:21 AM
11

I bet you look for discounts on used butt plugs.
/r/MGTOW12/06/19 02:21 AM
1

You can tell who rules over you by who you are not allowed to criticize. I think this canard needs to be amended. It should read "you can tell who rules over you by who's misbehavior you are not allowed to criticize." Obviously no one would tolerate you criticizing someone if they hadn't actually done anything wrong.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 10:14 PM
6

I think that's the general consensus on this thread: the right hasn't really done much for men, but there are still some (rare) examples of them actually taking action: e.g. taking back the "dear colleague" letter, and attempting to actually take punitive action against false allegations. The left has pretty consistently either done nothing, or has worked to actively, and knowingly harm men.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 06:35 PM
3

Well I wouldn't have worded it that harshly, but you aren't wrong.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 06:30 PM
3

The right is an unreliable ally. The left is a reliable enemy.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 06:19 PM
8

post your hog.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 06:14 PM
4

Good point. The right isn't generally doing the MRM any favors, but that's still quite a bit better than the left's behavior, which is openly and unapologetically hostile to the MRM. The right can't be relied on to help us. The left can be relied on to try to actively harm us.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 06:11 PM
19

2/10. Troll elsewhere.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 06:04 PM
34

60% of male manages now say they're uncomfortable mentoring women Who wants to bet that the other 40% are uncomfortable disclosing that they're uncomfortable mentoring women? The way things are right now, even mentioning that you're worried about these things could be construed as "harassment" or other such nonsense.
/r/MensRights11/06/19 04:05 PM
2

It often does, however, mean fewer privileges. For example: Elimination of alimony would mean far less money being transferred from men to women. Men being granted default equal custody means women can't simultaneously be given default sole custody. Police treating DV calls fairly would almost definitely result in far more women being imprisoned and convicted for DV.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 04:33 PM
6

Post pictures of geese instead.
/r/MGTOW10/06/19 01:46 PM
18

"I don't want to accuse you of lying, but my bullshit-o-meter just caught on fire and melted through the table."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen08/06/19 12:43 AM
3

The overwhelming majority of the "good feminists" actually "nothing feminists." They are neither good nor bad. Their defining attribute is the complete inaction on the behalf of men, one way or the other. Furthermore, of the tiny fraction of actual "good feminists" who at some point managed to stand up for a man at some point in their life, most of them have only done so in a way at benefits women also, usually to a greater degree.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 05:15 PM
7

"So where were you good feminists when the bad feminists were passing laws?" *crickets. The only good self-proclaimed feminist I can think of off the top of my head is Christina Hoff Summers and pretty much every other self-proclaimed feminist hates her guts if they even know who she is.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 05:09 PM
7

How many miles on that hodometer?
/r/MGTOW07/06/19 01:20 AM
3

The Duluth model is the first thing that comes to mind. Large portions of Family law too. Racial quotas. etc.
/r/MensRights07/06/19 12:26 AM
-3

2 of 3 accusations I'm pretty sure those aren't the real numbers...
/r/MensRights06/06/19 09:45 PM
10

I don't want to give a shit about race or gender, however when you tell me that my opinion is irrelevant or less valuable because of those things or when you make laws that put me at great risk with no comparable rights specifically because of how I was born, I suddenly * have* to care about those things even if I'd prefer not to.
/r/MensRights06/06/19 06:57 PM
9

She's probably put herself in a situation where someone had to compliment her on something. "You have nice..." *uncomfortable pause while the person tries desperately think of a way to avoid making a blatant lie "...eyes."
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/06/19 09:18 PM
6

Like all the novel studies are almost all feminine books. Can't stress this enough. How many boys are turned off from reading because the only thing they're ever introduced to is basically literary Valium.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 08:44 PM
1

Any that do not have heavy moderation cease to be feminist pretty quickly. It's an ideology sustained almost entirely by it's adherent's ignorance of actual criticism against it.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 08:37 PM
2

I've noticed that in the event that a feminist can't simply silence whoever they're arguing against, their next tactic seems to be to hope that the sheer intensity of their smugness will cancel out their lack of an actual rebuttal.
/r/MensRights05/06/19 06:15 PM
12

Why do I have to give up my seat? I wasn't the one to go out and fuck someone who doesn't have a car.
/r/MGTOW05/06/19 04:01 PM
7

Police really aren't set up to help abused men. That's an understatement. "not set up to help" would actually be a step up from the status quo. The way things stand right now the police's response to men experiencing DV could only be described as "set up to actively harm".
/r/MensRights04/06/19 06:10 PM
1

The real problem with false accusations is the way feminists have used them to weasel their way around due process to administer punishment. If you get accused, you lose your job. True. When this is pointed out however, feminists try to deflect blame for this away from themselves and onto the company that did the firing, but what would happen to the company if they decided to not fire you after a mere accusation? Well thanks to feminist championed "equal opportunity laws" they can be sued for "c…
/r/MensRights30/05/19 05:38 PM
0

Yeah. Look at all these weak men. Even though the abuse is allowed and facilitated by the government itself, men should just go to do some push ups at the gym and learn to hold frame. That'll fix everything. Everyone knows that if you can bench over 300lbs family court becomes fair again and no one believes false accusations against you anymore.
/r/MGTOW30/05/19 05:01 PM
1

She just keeps on eating...
/r/MGTOW30/05/19 02:52 PM
18

Yeah. Just because you carry your stuff in a backpack doesn't mean you "backpacked" although I suppose it is technically impressive being able to cross half a continent with one's ankles in the air the entire time.
/r/MGTOW28/05/19 03:45 AM
8

The true meaning of AWALT. No, it doesn't mean that every single woman is like that. It just means that for all intents and purposes you must act as though they are, because legally there's nothing stopping them if they have a bad day. Its also the reason women "commit less crime" than men. The horrible things that women can do exclusively to men tend to be entirely legal, and when those things aren't legal per-se, the punishments doled out to women who commit those crimes are negligible compare…
/r/MGTOW27/05/19 06:08 PM
1

Sarah Connor was the protagonist in the first two movies. The general idea is sound, but this movie really isn't an example of it just because of casting decisions. It'll probably be crammed full of feminist cringe though.
/r/MGTOW27/05/19 06:02 PM
3

The real reason women on average earn less than men: They don't necessarily have to earn money in order to be able to spend it.
/r/MGTOW27/05/19 05:59 PM
2

This is great! It always breaks the immersion for me when I go to see a movie about a professional assassin and he doesn't have a healthy sensitivity toward other people's personal boundaries.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 05:55 PM
41

All I need in this life is my baby boy. And welfare. Don't forget the shit-ton welfare you'll also need.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen27/05/19 05:42 PM
2

I have really mixed opinions about Alabama right now.
/r/MensRights24/05/19 03:42 PM
18

I think the point is to draw a parallel between the horrible situation women are in, and point out that it's just the status quo for men everywhere. The idea is to clue people in, not advocate that this is the ideal situation. This picture is a bit clumsy though. The idea behind Legal Paternal Surrender (LPS) wouldn't be to give men the option to decide that a woman has to abort, but only to relinquish any rights or responsibilities to a child beforehand if he did not want the child. This pictur…
/r/MensRights22/05/19 04:17 PM
32

It would be interesting to see what happens if we somehow manage to tie men's right to bodily autonomy with women's right to bodily autonomy. Right to abort (to a point) with right to Legal Paternal Surrender (as discussed in this sub). Which will win out for Feminists.?The right to choose or the right to have one's (more limited) choices subsidized by others?
/r/MensRights22/05/19 04:15 PM
23

You do bring up an interesting point that I hadn't thought of before regarding medical credibility. For some reason the medical community is really digging their heels in as far as circumcision is concerned, and it's eroding trust accordingly. This is especially bad for when the doctors absolutely need their credibility intact to counter the nonsense that anti-vaxxers spew. If all that good will has been used up fighting to justify involuntary infant cosmetic amputations, the anti-vaxxers will o…
/r/MensRights22/05/19 12:40 AM
7

“When people get used to preferential treatment, equal treatment seems like discrimination.” Thomas Sowell It never ceases to amaze me how utterly oblivious they are to the benefits being conferred on them but not on men. Men have zero reproductive rights and not only have no control over their own genetic destiny but are also forced to subsidize the use of said rights, by others, that they themselves are denied. That is privilege. It's privilege so utterly ubiquitous that vapid bimbos like Spei…
/r/MensRights21/05/19 07:38 PM
3

Then our support for women's right to abortion should be tied to feminists support for Legal Paternal Surrender. Either we have both, or neither. If it's perfectly acceptable for one half of the population to have no control over their genetic destiny after sex then its fair for the other half too. If feminists really believe what they say about choice being a right then they can damn well stop treating it like an exclusive privilege.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 12:34 AM
1

actually enforced Oh, it'll be enforced. The problem is who's it's enforced by. Express reservations about your SO dressing your son up as a girl with dubious consent from said son? Hate crime. Claim that Patriarchy theory is nonsense? "Patriarchy hurts men too!" Hate crime. Laws like this always end up being handled by those least worthy of doing so, and they'll be no less of a inane, backwards disaster when used supposedly "in support of men" than when they are used for other protected groups.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 12:29 AM
1

We're kidding ourselves if we think that any law like this would be enforced in a reasonable manner. The people defining what counts as "hate" will undoubtedly be feminist.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 12:22 AM
7

Silver lining: Last scene was of a man walking into the wilderness with his dog.
/r/MensRights21/05/19 12:18 AM
25

Turns out that getting hygiene advice from a schizophrenic bronze age nomad isn't that great. Who knew?
/r/MensRights20/05/19 10:43 PM
1

Feminists: "Women deserve the same rights as men!" *Alabama happens. Feminists: "Wait no, that's not what we meant."
/r/MensRights20/05/19 08:23 PM
11

I post this every time something like this topic comes up: What would happen if men simply vanished? Almost 100% of power plant operators, distributors, and dispatchers are men. Immediate planetwide power outage. 91% of the nation’s electrical engineers are men and 97.6% of electrical power line installers and maintenance workers are men. Said power outage would never be fixed. 95.5% of water and liquid waste treatment plant and system operators are men. So there goes water after electicity. Pro…
/r/MGTOW20/05/19 04:00 PM
2

Did you ever think that maybe there aren't any cases of doctors being prosecuted because it doesn't happen? It's possible, however unlikely, especially considering the following: Third trimester abortions are only about 1% of the total abortions done in this country. The numbers are low enough, in fact, that there are only 4 doctors in the entire US that still perform them outside of a hospital: Unfortunately, three of those four doctors are on record stating that at least some of their third tr…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 11:26 PM
2

Wait, do you have any examples of a doctor aborting a baby late into the third trimester, or after it's born, because the patient was "stressed out"? It's a bit hard to find examples with names because of the secretive nature of these things, but ironically, the first one that popped up when trying to find an example for you was one from a pro-abortion website. Beth, from Oregon, had an abortion at 28 weeks along despite no health reason "I feel like it’s important to share my story because my h…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 09:07 PM
-1

You (nor anyone else) gets any say besides her and the doctor performing the procedure. If I'm going to be getting the bill either for the abortion or for childcare, I absolutely have the right to dictate what a woman gets to do with her body, as does anyone else. As a man, I sure as hell don't have any say over my body where parenthood is concerned, so too bad so sad. The world's smallest violin plays for women who are forced to bear the indignity of being put in the same situation. People are …
/r/MensRights16/05/19 05:33 PM
2

Do you not understand that this is a legally enforceable standard. It isn't though. It mean's literally nothing, and there's no way to make a distinction between what is in good faith and what isn't. I can just as easily point to the lack of prosecutions as evidence that your fear of women getting abortions in the third trimester for trivial reasons is not a thing. I have no evidence to support that claim but you've already shown that lack of evidence doesn't deter you in the slightest. The lack…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 05:28 PM
4

If it's wrong to force men to pay child support, then why is it okay to force women to carry to term? I don't think you're getting where I'm coming from. I am pro-choice (within reason), however what I am saying is that either it's acceptable to force both sexes to live with the consequences of sex or it's not acceptable for either to have their fate sealed at the moment of conception. One or the other. Right now in most places, women have choice while men do not. Especially when it's much harde…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 04:57 PM
5

...then when I respond with a valid source and actual language rebutting your claim you have the gall to call me disingenuous. I've addressed why your claim was horse shit. Source?. The fact that no doctor has ever been prosecuted for performing an abortion under these laws for having inadequate justification for doing so. If there were a single instance of a doctor saying "yeah, being stressed out is enough of a reason for an abortion, here we go!" and then getting in trouble with the law for d…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 04:48 PM
1

In the incredibly unlikely case that the doctor decided to abort based on something trivial or because he enjoys casually murdering babies then he would be in violation of the law. Except he wouldn't because the "good faith" and "health" provisions are meaningless buzz words and confer no actual limitations. I challenge you to find a single case of a doctor providing an abortion for trivial reasons under these laws and actually being prosecuted for it. "We would never do this, but we still need …
/r/MensRights16/05/19 04:38 PM
-2

You're suggesting that mother is go through all of the motions of pregnancy, including the costs of prenatal care, and then decide last minute to abort? Some people are lazy. You're either dumb or out of touch. Right back at you. A small percentage of abortions happened in the 3rd trimester, and of those abortions, virtually all of them are for health related reasons for either the mother or the baby. health related reasons "Gee doctor, I'm feeling stressed" "Say no more, let me get the scissors…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 04:37 PM
6

I don't agree with this, but even if it's true, what do you think the mother is doing for those 18+ years? Probably work to support the baby. In a case like Alabama, where she doesn't have a choice about it, she's just in the same situation that men have always been in. In other states where she does have the choice, it's irrelevant, because she chose to take on that burden, unlike the men who were not given that choice. That's the important part: Consent. I don't agree with this, but even if it…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 04:32 PM
4

or the abortion is necessary to protect the patient’s life or health." Did you think I wouldn't notice this?
/r/MensRights16/05/19 04:24 PM
5

Except he's being disingenuous. The "necessary to protect the patient’s life or health" has always been the weasel words used to justify abortion at any time, where a claim of emotional or psychological stress enough to get a doctor to sign off on the abortion.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 04:22 PM
2

Plus it wouldn't even work logistically. Imagine you have 10 men and 10 women. If you give 9 men vasectomies, you still have a potential of 10 women giving birth as a result of the one man. If instead you give 9 of the women tubal ligations, you'd only have 1 potential woman giving birth.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 04:07 PM
2

we should support bodily autonomy and people's right to choose, so we can lobby for paper abortions. We should make our support for women's right to choose conditional on whether or not men's right to choose is also supported. If men's last chance to control their own reproductive destiny ends at conception then so should women's. If women get to have choices about their own fate after the fact then so should men.
/r/MensRights16/05/19 04:03 PM
9

we wouldn't tell men "if you don't want child support, learn to be gay or be better at using condoms." Just saying "learn to like anal" is so selfish and makes no sense. Well "we" here in this subreddit tend to be in favor of Legal Paternal Surrender, but for pretty much everyone else the above literally is what men are told, and it's literally the law. If men don't want kids but are still forced to be a father, they don't have to risk their lives, they don't get permanent physical changes, they…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 03:57 PM
16

There's actually several different instances that get confused. Virginia - where a gaffe-prone governor fumbled through a discussion about what to do with severe deformities and non-viable fetuses and ended up derailing the passage of a law that would have allowed abortion up until delivery. New York - legitimate post-delivery "abortions" even on healthy infants. Both the New York law and the (now defunct) Virginia bill allow or would have allowed abortion up until the moment of delivery even fo…
/r/MensRights16/05/19 03:44 PM
3

they don't say it be like it is but it do.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/05/19 07:44 PM
14

Eh. I've heard them occasionally pretend to care about the draft. Those voices are conspicuously absent however any time there's an actual chance to change the status quo though. It's almost like they never really meant it in the first place.
/r/MGTOW15/05/19 07:36 PM
3

You know what. If someone's "mental issues" cause them to harm other people then they should go to jail regardless. "Oh, so you're the kind of crazy that causes you to make wild accusations about people you don't know? Sucks to be you. Enjoy prison." The only concession I'll give is that these types of people should be allowed to keep their shoelaces in their cell.
/r/MGTOW15/05/19 07:27 PM
22

"A guy couldn't possibly know what it's like to have no choice about whether or not to be a parent after sex!" The lack of awareness is staggering. Their "doomsday scenario" is literally the status quo of all men throughout history to this very day, in every culture, and the only way they could possibly say the above with a straight face is because they have literally, never once, considered things from a man's point of view.
/r/MGTOW15/05/19 06:43 PM
26

Turns out there is a limit to women's behavior that even that sub won't tolerate.
/r/MGTOW15/05/19 06:02 PM
6

So many "good christian women". Sorry, you may apply that label to yourself but we listened when you bragged to your harpy friends about how you went on that amazing foreign adventure and somehow didn't need to worry about paying for your own meals, and we connected the dots.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/05/19 05:29 PM
2

It would be fun to make a fake profile for a Japanese whaling ship to swipe right on all the profiles like this.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/05/19 05:20 PM
2

An important distinction to make.
/r/MensRights15/05/19 03:39 PM
1

Is there someone you forgot to ask?
/r/MGTOW14/05/19 12:03 AM
2

When I got tired of eating pasta and eggs all the time, the first thing I did was pick up one of those "weeknight dinner" cooking magazines and just follow the directions. It starts out as expensive when you have to buy literally everything they tell you to use, but as your collection of spices and cooking equipment grows, the amount of money you have to spend making a new recipe shrinks accordingly.
/r/MGTOW10/05/19 12:27 AM
4

Oh also... Vegetable of your choice The thing I like to pair with the above recipe is some roasted balsamic brussel sprouts.: Ingredients: 5 brussel sprouts per person being served salt and pepper minced garlic or garlic powder grated Parmesan cheese olive oil Balsalmic vinegar Directions: Step 1: cut each brussel sprout in half. Step 2: on a small baking sheet or oven pan coat the sprouts first with olive oil and then cover each with a pinch of salt, pepper, garlic powder, and Parmesan cheese. …
/r/MGTOW09/05/19 08:33 PM
5

With this one I've found that you can save money (scallops are expensive) if you find one of those "misshapen scallop chunks" bags that they occasionally have in the frozen fish sections. It all looks the same once its mixed together, so there's really no reason to shell out for the perfectly cylindrical ones. Also, in my opinion the frozen ones taste just as good as the fresh ones if you give them the time to thaw properly but they also have the added bonus of lasting longer in storage. As you …
/r/MGTOW09/05/19 08:02 PM
9

recipes I should try Easy Coquilles Saint-Jacques: Ingredients: 1lb scallops 1C Gruyere cheese, shredded 1/2C dry white wine 1C mayonnaise 1/4C chopped shallots 2TBSP minced garlic 1/2C butter, divided 1C seasoned bread crumbs salt pepper parsley for decoration Directions: Step 1: Prepare shallots: Spread scallops over clean cloth or paper towels and allow them to dry for a few minutes. If you buy them frozen, allow them time to thaw completely. Sprinkle both sides with salt and pepper. Once tha…
/r/MGTOW09/05/19 07:50 PM
3

The irony though is that in the 1910's and 1920's the gender ratio in higher education was roughly 6:7 women to men. It's a myth that women were ever excluded by law in the first place, at least in the West.
/r/MGTOW09/05/19 07:15 PM
1

Nah, it's ok to buy this book. It's a satire, through and through. The whole point of the book was to demonstrate the absurdity of how biased things are against men.
/r/MGTOW09/05/19 07:11 PM
1

dimmadarn.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 08:25 PM
4

It's stunning how hard it is to convince people that maybe it isn't the best idea to get your genital hygiene advice from some bronze-age wanderer who had a few schizophrenic episodes in the desert 6000 years ago.
/r/MensRights08/05/19 08:23 PM
15

Developmental disabilities. That sounds retarded.
/r/MGTOW08/05/19 03:33 PM
3

I probably should start caring, right? Just because you don't have an interest in politics doesn't mean that politics doesn't have an interest in you. I understand and share the desire to be left alone, but a huge portion of the world does not ascribe to the "live and let live" mantra. They will find you and try to bend you to their will, and the only way to truly avoid conflict with those types of people is to surrender to them completely.
/r/MGTOW07/05/19 09:40 PM
1

There's almost never any downside to an accusation, so whenever literally any reason for making one presents itself to an unprincipled woman there's no reason to not use it. Got caught sleeping around and the boyfriend might leave? Accusation. Want to extort the boss because he foolishly decided to decline your promotion behind closed doors? Accusation. Feel like you're not getting enough attention at any given moment? Accusation. There literally isn't any reason too petty to use one and it's on…
/r/MensRights06/05/19 11:39 PM
9

Funny how they suddenly develop a healthy sense of skepticism the instant it's a man making the accusation.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 11:34 PM
12

We hate involuntary circumcision. Want to carve your own dick up? go right ahead.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 11:31 PM
1

Who gives a shit if it's their life? The taxpayers who end up having to foot the bill for the irresponsible behavior of others.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 07:37 PM
2

The fact that the woman got free housing and food for years, for herself and for the kid which is also hers, doesn't seem to enter the calculations either. If anything, the man would be far richer and advanced in his career if he had simply gone his own way.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 02:33 PM
5

The degree to which anyone should be inclined to believe a rape accusation should be proportional to the likelihood that the accuser would face severe consequences if that accusation were proven to be a lie.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 02:26 PM
5

God damn, what a cancerous comment section though.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 02:23 PM
3

Combine the lack of male role models in male children's lives with the desperate need to find a way to transition to manhood; for a large portion of men, the only way they can think of to express their masculinity is to become unreasonably zealous in the defense and aid of women, regardless of circumstance. A lot of women don't see any problem with this because it results in a large group of people willing to serve them without asking for anything in return.
/r/MensRights06/05/19 02:14 PM
2

a man can't do shit if a gun is pointed to his head or if he is too drugged to fight back. Of if he's told "do what I say or I'll tell everyone you raped me."
/r/MensRights02/05/19 07:25 PM
2

40 years involved in a profession only to be utterly outclassed by someone with 0 years in said profession. Turns out that devoting one's life to utter nonsense doesn't, in fact, make that nonsense true.
/r/MensRights02/05/19 07:19 PM
6

What a catch. Too bad Easter Island so far away.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen30/04/19 06:59 PM
1

Lots of beer in that refrigerator.
/r/MGTOW30/04/19 02:51 PM
1

Is there data on transgenderism in such homes vs in general? Even with chance that someone manages to do such a study in the first place that shows those results, you know there's basically zero chance of that kind of study ever being funded again. It's a way that feminists and the like control the narrative: If a piece of information contradicts feminist dogma, make sure it never sees the light of day.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 05:14 PM
1

"A man's woman has a lot to do with the success he chooses to have in his life." There. I fixed it.
/r/MensRights24/04/19 03:33 PM
5

closely related to the tricareatops.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 07:01 PM
27

To make the analogy more accurate: The escalator should be for women only, and the stairs should be for men and women. At the top though, no one can tell which women took the stairs and which ones took the escalator, but everyone knows the men took the stairs.
/r/MensRights23/04/19 04:15 PM
3

You'll notice that bigots like that also tend to be big fans of getting the government to tell you how you can spend your money...
/r/MensRights23/04/19 12:09 AM
13

Only the top tiny percentage of men, those in power and hereditary wealth, have been privileged. and even then those privileged men had equally privileged women standing right next to them, not minding at all that they didn't have quite the same amount of power because it also meant a proportional lack of responsibilities.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 11:29 PM
5

Hell, AOC didn't even answer the casting call the Justice Democrats put out for candidates. Her brother signed her up and told her about it afterward, and she's literally on video admitting to this.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 08:17 PM
3

Diversity is neither good nor bad and there shouldn't be any "nudging" with regards to ethnicity, sex, or social origin, either for or against it. according to a significant portion of the social justice movement, this statement is racist, sexist, and classicist.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 03:03 PM
7

The dark little secret about why men tend to commit more crimes: A huge portion of the evil shit that women tend to want to do to others is legal, for all intents and purposes. Want to defraud someone of decades of their lives and hundreds of thousands of dollars? Tell him the kid is his. Legal. Want to force someone to pay for you to sit on your ass? Lie about birth control. Legal. Want to lock someone in a cage for 15 years? Just make some shit up and the government will do it for you. The cha…
/r/MGTOW18/04/19 06:38 PM
4

You're going to have to define "privilege" here. Is it the original, measurable meaning: "The law is different (and more favorable) for one group over the other." Or is the nebulous miasma of guilt that feminists and the like try to emit when they want something from you? If it's the first definition, you'd be hard pressed to find a way that women are not privileged over men in a way not directly linked to biological reality.
/r/MensRights15/04/19 04:38 PM
25

hoedometer. I want to draw everyone's attention to this word.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/04/19 08:41 PM
1

Considering how many men are sent to jail for this kind of stuff with no evidence whatsoever, or laughably circumstantial evidence, it makes me wonder at how many men are in jail because the woman took even a tiny amount of effort at fabricating evidence.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 10:06 PM
32

It's kind of a requirement though if you follow patriarchy theory its logical conclusions. The degree to which a feminist hates men (white men in particular) is proportional to how closely said feminist adheres to the dogma.
/r/MensRights10/04/19 05:53 PM
4

Getting really tired of people treating the military like it's supposed to be a social-networking boy's and girl's outdoor fun club. You have one for the (hopefully distant) day when you need to kill people and break things, and pretending that it has any other purpose lulls people into thinking they're doing some poor bastards a favor by using the military on them.
/r/MensRights09/04/19 07:35 PM
11

But don't worry. After the initial incomprehensible amount of pain, the baby's mind will literally break and become incapable of processing what it's going through. That means it's just like it's painless! big fuckin /s
/r/MensRights09/04/19 01:39 PM
8

You can’t live a healthy life with your mindset. I was raped and I don’t hate all men. Difference here is that with rape, the government doesn't show up and actively aid the rapist. With rape, the justice system is used to punish the wrongdoer and attempt to compensate the victim. With a false accusation, it's the thing used to commit the wrong in the first place and reward the wrongdoer. There is no "better" justice system that you can appeal to in order to defend yourself against the actual ju…
/r/MGTOW08/04/19 10:31 PM
4

Funny how the idea that men put "emotional labor" into their relationships also never occurs to them though...
/r/MensRights08/04/19 09:56 PM
2

Trump bans transgender people from being in the military almost immediately into his presidency Another way that headline could be written: "People with severe medical or mental issues still barred from entering military service. Politically popular exceptions rescinded." This particular type of "oppression" is something that trans people share with people who have asthma or ADD.
/r/MensRights08/04/19 09:53 PM
4

See which hand fills up faster.
/r/MGTOW29/03/19 12:52 PM
7

Circuses are supposed to be fun...
/r/MensRights28/03/19 08:17 PM
5

Can't have men offing themselves. How are they going to pay taxes to pay for all of the free stuff we get if they're dead?! See? I care about men!
/r/MensRights25/03/19 04:17 PM
3

Yup if anything, Feminism has doubled down on gender roles while claiming to do the opposite. Even try suggesting that traditional male gender roles shouldn't be enforced by law in a feminist space and you'll never hear the end of it, assuming they don't just delete your comment first. The closest they'll get is "allowing" a man to do things normally considered feminine, but only when the women around him approve of it or can benefit from it.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 03:48 PM
3

Some men don't have a male role model, spending their entire lives finding a way to define themselves among adults who only ever define masculinity by their disparaging and dismissal of it. It's no surprise then that the only way these men think to define their masculinity is through their rejection of it.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 03:45 PM
13

I saw a post on r/unpopularopinion that if MRAs really cared about the male suicide rate, gun control would be their top priority. And I agree with that You going to ban tall buildings and rope too? No? Then shut the fuck up.
/r/MensRights25/03/19 03:36 PM
1

Most violent crimes are committed by men because the vast majority of horrible things that women tend to want to do to men are entirely legal or are done by other men on the behalf of a woman.
/r/MensRights18/03/19 12:44 PM
2

Dr. Ford does not recall the year, the month or day the alleged incident took place. She does not recall whose house or street that the assault took place She does not recall how she got there, or how she got home She does recall having just one beer at the party She recalls four other people at the party: Kavanaugh, Mark Judge, Patrick PJ Smith, Leland Keyser (whom she claims is her lifelong friend). Kavanaugh/Smith/Judge/Keyser have all issued statements under penalty of perjury, that they do …
/r/MensRights15/03/19 03:22 AM
2

Except without anything close to the resources to defend ourselves if accused.
/r/MensRights15/03/19 03:17 AM
1

These quotas aren't voluntary though. Failing to meet arbitrary and often nebulous "diversity standards" can result in significant legal costs. It doesn't even matter if a completely gender neutral hiring policy results in a skewed result entirely by chance, if the results aren't "diverse" enough the company opens itself up for litigation.
/r/MensRights13/03/19 07:38 PM
5

Statistically, someone who has been previously abused is more likely to seek out similar partners in the future. Statistically. How exactly did they collect the data for these statistics?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen13/03/19 05:33 PM
4

What the fuck is going on in this thread?
/r/MGTOW13/03/19 05:25 PM
71

Probably deleted, but maybe you'll get lucky. https://support.snapchat.com/en-US/a/snap-content Talk to a lawyer.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 05:47 PM
1

as per usual, for this type of person "needs" is synonymous with "deserves" too.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 03:47 PM
27

The thing that really irks me is that people think that "not being able to cry" is the biggest problem affecting men and the primary cause of male suicide. This is a controlled narrative: a lightning rod on the house of the feminist narrative meant only to direct the discussion away from actually acknowledging every other issue men face.
/r/MensRights12/03/19 03:43 PM
2

And here I clicked on this thread to offer a pep talk. I feel robbed. Bamboozled, even.
/r/MGTOW12/03/19 07:09 AM
13

in all fairness, advice from Jim Carrey is usually fucking terrible.
/r/MGTOW12/03/19 07:04 AM
12

If your consent is involved, then a softer term would be appropriate. Amputation would be the more correct term in that case. However, for damn near every case of MGM, mutilation remains the correct description since it implies a lack of consent from the person receiving the amputation.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 05:35 PM
6

http://judgybitch.com/2013/09/17/what-would-happen-if-no-men-showed-up-for-work-today/ Women don't show up for work?: problems in selected industries. Men don't show up for work?: Immediate apocalypse.
/r/MGTOW07/03/19 11:29 PM
6

Just be forewarned, if you go around telling people about the bias in the US Family court, eventually you're going to hear someone say "well the only reason men don't get custody is because they don't try"... or some variant thereof. When they do that... you can use this to point out why they're wrong Yes, its old, but it directly addresses the primary source feminists tend to use to try to claim that there is no bias. All (or at least most) studies of gender bias in the court systems since this…
/r/MensRights05/03/19 10:23 PM
8

She'd basically have to start a toddler fight-club before the courts would start thinking "hmm. maybe we should consider other options." There are exceptions of course but it's rare and usually astronomically expensive for a father to even get equal parenting time. Most men in that situation look at the costs involved and just decide that their kid would be better off without them being broke. Conversely, mothers tend to have their court costs either paid for by the men they're trying to divorce…
/r/MensRights05/03/19 09:54 PM
13

Unfortunately, despite the more-or-less sane response from the commenters, the US legal system most likely agrees with her point of view and will enforce it upon the husband if things get litigious. Her level of irresponsible and narcissistic behavior is nowhere near what is normally required to get the courts to see the father as the more fitting caretaker.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 08:58 PM
19

How much do you want to bet her definition of "respect" changes wildly depending on whether she is giving it or receiving it.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen05/03/19 08:08 PM
12

This book is a satire. It's supposed to be upsetting. Edit: to clarify. It's a satire of the "a modest proposal" variety, meant to highlight the unequal treatment of men in society and the legal system by pretending to revel in it.
/r/MensRights05/03/19 04:53 PM
2

And that after this is accomplished, and the brave new world begins When all men are paid for existing and no man must pay for his sins, As surely as Water will wet us, as surely as Fire will burn, The Gods of the Copybook Headings with terror and slaughter return.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen04/03/19 04:15 PM
3

The humble genius
/r/MGTOW04/03/19 03:18 PM
1

Saved
/r/MensRights01/03/19 11:03 PM
7

You could argue that not paying child support is a crime which is punishable. As I understand it, this is actually the twisted logic used to justify child support. It's like saying that it's ok to enslave someone for the crime of refusing to be enslaved.
/r/MGTOW01/03/19 06:35 PM
8

But it also affect women negatively that society see them as weaker than men. That's like saying that slavery negatively effected white men also because white men were seen as less suited to working in the cotton fields. It's not a negative effect for women, full stop. It is a privilege and nothing else.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 06:34 PM
6

The 13th amendment to the constitution is the one that outlawed slavery. It reads like this: Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. Child support clearly fits under the definition of "involuntary servitude" where no crime has been committed, yet it stil…
/r/MGTOW01/03/19 06:02 PM
2

Technically we have flying cars, we just call them helicopters.
/r/MGTOW01/03/19 05:15 PM
3

Surprisingly faithful to the source material, not a cookie-cutter plot, and it avoids a lot of the shoe-horned feminist cringe that damn near every other movie with a female lead tends to have these days. Only problem is that it does suffer a bit from the problems that pop up when you condense a longer plot into a 2 hour movie, but they managed those issues about as well as you could reasonably expect them to.
/r/MGTOW01/03/19 05:08 PM
2

"Cash me outside" girl. So President Ocasio-Cortez then. look at a video of them side by side. Same low-brow mannerisms despite an upper-middle class upbringing.
/r/MGTOW01/03/19 05:05 PM
5

Nobody will do free yard work for a post wall woman. Uncle Sam might not give you that choice.
/r/MGTOW01/03/19 05:01 PM
4

I constantly wonder how things like child support wiggle around the 13th amendment.
/r/MGTOW01/03/19 04:59 PM
5

I constantly wonder how things like child support wiggle around the 13th amendment.
/r/MGTOW01/03/19 04:58 PM
11

This is a prejudice that affects both men and women negatively. Having a lighter sentence is indeed the result of "prejudice" but it most certainly does not affect women negatively. When there is a positive legal imbalance given to a certain group based on their immutable characteristics that's what a privilege is. Now I'm not the guy you were originally talking to, so I just copy pasted the first thing that popped up on google, but now I have a bit more time to search for examples. Here's what …
/r/MensRights01/03/19 04:36 PM
11

One example There was a case of a MP calling for all women's prisons to be closed but google isn't cooperating right now.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 03:31 PM
10

I'd bet money that her definition of "being controlling" was her husband simply refusing to submit to her controlling behavior. Edit: Yeah, called it. Fucking DARVO. “The whole thing was a game, let’s get one over on Sally again,” she said in one police interview. “Signing a post-nuptial that was just a way of him having a control that he could carry on doing what he wanted ... I leave him I wouldn’t get very much. It was just his way of controlling me.” Him wanting control over his own property…
/r/MensRights28/02/19 02:17 AM
3

If anything, i'd bet showing vulnerability increases it. It's one thing to know that society doesn't give a shit about men, and hardening yourself against that reality as you grow up. It's another thing entirely to believe everyone's self-righteous spiel about how you "just need to open up more" and then finding out the hard way that its a giant lie they all tell each other just to make themselves feel better when they know damn well that you're going to be thrown you to the wolves the instant y…
/r/MensRights28/02/19 01:55 AM
7

Trust but verify. Almost always the best policy.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 05:47 PM
3

Voluntary exchanges are not slavery. you have been banned from r/socialism.
/r/MGTOW26/02/19 05:44 PM
2

Is he finally free?
/r/MGTOW26/02/19 05:31 PM
1

Its satire, of the "A Modest Proposal" variety.
/r/MGTOW25/02/19 08:11 PM
2

In the comments: So I've had similar experiences kinda, my girlfriend went to America for around 5 month and now is in Ireland for another 4. While it is awkward for the person staying behind, I wouldn't ever consider ending the relationship over it. You probably dodged someone really insecure and controlling. Enjoy your trip. Anyone want to tell him?
/r/MGTOW25/02/19 03:04 PM
0

"When you’re white, you don’t know what it’s like to be living in a ghetto. You don’t know what it’s like to be poor. You don’t know what it’s like to be hassled when you walk down the street or you get dragged out of a car." Bernie Sanders.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 11:40 PM
7

Feminism is about equality in the same way that cannibalism is about making sure everyone has enough to eat.
/r/MensRights22/02/19 08:42 PM
2

I'm much more receptive to being told to "man up" when it's done by someone who's going to be doing the same thing. When it's someone else telling me to get back to serving their wants; assuming that their use of my services is the moral equivalent of my providing them... that's when it gets irritating.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/02/19 04:07 PM
1

"If you think people shouldn't go hungry, you're a cannibal."
/r/MensRights19/02/19 06:17 AM
2

I had to explain to an insurance adjuster lady that asbestos was not, in fact, a type of mold. Took a half hour.
/r/MGTOW16/02/19 03:22 PM
19

f: Was promoted way beyond her competence as a diversity hire and is actively a danger to those around her as a result.
/r/MGTOW13/02/19 02:53 AM
2

While those are good descriptions of the behavior you're talking about, I'd walk back the original claim you made a bit. Instead of saying "most" maybe "a lot" would be more defensible.
/r/MensRights13/02/19 01:18 AM
35

We are literally fighting to get men to take MORE responsibility for their children, FFS. You're conflating two different groups of men: 1) Men who want to see their children but aren't allowed to. 2) Men who never wanted to be fathers in the first place but were forced into it. Your talking points are bullshit Here's why that article is bullshit
/r/MensRights12/02/19 09:28 PM
2

The sheer arrogant ignorance it takes for someone to think that "women laughing at them" is the worst thing men have to fear from women... and then to go on unironically whinging about "understanding lived experiences." These people are walking stereotypes.
/r/MensRights12/02/19 08:22 PM
5

"As a feminist, I will sanctimoniously say these things above as long as there's no chance of these things changing, however whenever one of these things might actually be fixed, I am conspicuously absent at best, and if present, then I am almost inevitably vocally opposed to said fixing."
/r/MensRights11/02/19 11:18 PM
2

Canada does this mostly. In the states this is much more rare, and there's a lot of qualifying criteria that have to be met first.
/r/MensRights11/02/19 04:49 PM
1

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/11/hillary-clinton-2016-donald-trump-214428 and PDF of the email in question
/r/MensRights11/02/19 03:54 AM
1

(she's literally the reason that Trump is in office) not just in the sense that she is just more awful than he is: From the Podesta emails, it's made abundantly clear that the DNC used their media butt-buddies to focus on and steer Trump into nomination over the other Republican candidates.
/r/MensRights07/02/19 08:12 PM
5

Funny how we don't pull out newborn's fingernails so they don't have to clean under them for the rest of their lives using that logic though...
/r/MensRights07/02/19 08:02 PM
7

The funny part is, men actually started saying "yeah that sounds like a good idea" and then they started doing just that... then feminists called them sexist for doing so, and are even now trying to find more ways to make the ways that men mitigate their risk of false accusation illegal. - see the Pence rule and other professionals avoiding even the chance of not having an alibi with women in the workplace. As absurd as the idea of "rape culture" is I don't think there's even a definition for ra…
/r/MensRights07/02/19 07:47 PM
3

If you subsidize something you get more of it. If you tax it, you get less of it. For some reason people think this doesn't apply to poverty and wealth respectively.
/r/MGTOW07/02/19 05:02 PM
20

Because masturbation is the devil. Now eat your corn flakes!
/r/MGTOW07/02/19 04:57 PM
7

Welcome, but stay around here for a while and the previous waves are going to look something like this: 1st wave: right to vote without the same responsibilities (the draft) 2nd wave: codifying privilege into law and calling it "rights" (Title IX, Duluth model, etc.) 3rd wave: otherwise naked bigotry and exclusion but wearing the flayed skin of "inclusiveness" (ask anyone here for examples, they'll be happy to fill you in)
/r/MensRights07/02/19 04:43 PM
1

Feminism is "Gaslighting" on a national scale.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 04:34 PM
32

Firstly, fewer women are considered "the best chefs" because being a chef involves a hell of a lot more than just cooking. They're running a very demanding business in a very competitive market, and the actual work of being a professional chef is more comparable to being an electrician or a plumber or any of the other "dirty" jobs that women on average, tend to avoid on their own volition. The only real difference with "chef" from the others is that it tends to have a tiny element of show-biz an…
/r/MensRights06/02/19 04:28 PM
7

If we're going by total collective harm done, MGM is far worse considering how widespread and commonplace it is. FGM is considered abhorrent except for a handful of backwater 3rd world countries, and even there they try to keep it behind closed doors. MGM on the other hand isn't illegal in a single country.
/r/MensRights06/02/19 04:21 PM
6

wELL YOU See... A woman can be victimized repeatedly during a war. A man can only get killed once. Therefore women have it worse. Feminists, probably.
/r/MensRights05/02/19 05:45 PM
7

Is it a secular religion? See how many analogues you can fill in: God: feminism Satan: patriarchy Demons: misogynists State of Grace: Pre-history, matriarchal societies, "the devine feminine" The Fall from Grace: start of civilization, job specialization, men "taking over" society. Penance: allyship, voting the "correct" way. Salvation: "equality" of outcome. Communion: vapid TED talks, virtue signalling. Tithing: paying more taxes than one uses in government services. Indulgences: being allowed…
/r/MensRights04/02/19 07:47 PM
2

College men have more than triple the number of sexual partners as college women? Are you fucking kidding? I'll bet the original source said something like: Sexually active College men have more than triple the number of sexual partners as sexually active college women... ignoring the vast differences between the numbers of sexually inactive men and women. Edit: Never mind. They relied on self reporting with no way to verify. Predictable outcome.
/r/MensRights04/02/19 06:06 PM
8

There are lots of things that people use to "fill in the blanks" in their psyche when they "reject religion" This isn't meant as a criticism, just a note that the trappings and function of organized faith may very well be something that is hard-wired into our brains. Government, "the collective will of society", environmentalism, feminism, etc. These are all very popular things that get treated as religions among the average "atheist" who isn't aware of that little shaman in his head, banging hi…
/r/MensRights04/02/19 05:55 PM
17

This isn't treating women like objects. It's treating objects like women.
/r/MensRights02/02/19 03:07 AM
0

regfems?
/r/MensRights02/02/19 12:13 AM
3

A few days ago I benched 365lb without a spotter, no issue. Impressive, but you really should use a spotter whenever using free weights, especially when the weight starts really getting up there like that. Doesn't matter how strong you are. Sometimes the body just has hard limits. I had a coworker once who was lifting about what you are when some ligament in his shoulder tore. If it hadn't been for the spotter the bar would have landed on his neck.
/r/MGTOW31/01/19 03:13 AM
2

"But at least I'm still ok having you look after my dog."
/r/MensRights28/01/19 04:50 PM
0

You answered the question in your own title.
/r/MensRights25/01/19 08:20 PM
3

Ironically, they don't just want autonomy over their own bodies, but also want to extend that control over (the product of the labor derived from) men's bodies. It's not enough simply to let them do as they wish. You have to actively provide the means for them to do it.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 04:29 PM
2

I'm sorry can you repeat the question? I couldn't hear it over the loud sucking noise made by my tax dollars that I'll never see again in any form due to my gender.
/r/MensRights22/01/19 04:26 PM
7

"Sandy Ravage"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/01/19 12:27 AM
2

Quotas. Plain and simple. They have to hire a certain number of people who meet criteria X, Y, and Z, and since the people who tend to meet those criteria also tend to have a glaring reason for not being hired in the first place, the company is left with two bad choices: Either hire them and try to minimize the damage they cause by shuffling them off to made-up positions like EO departments or prepare to eat the costs of a giant lawsuit. The only reason they get hired is because its artificially…
/r/MGTOW17/01/19 03:52 AM
1

Wasn't used for that on any scale. So the 2,251 bombers that landed there don't qualify as "any scale"? How about the 1,191 fighter escorts and 3,081 strike sorties from attack craft that couldn't be conducted at all from the Marianas? Some fighter bomber work yes but the B-29s continued to operate out of the Mariana Islands Wrong. They took off usually from the Marianas Islands first (since those Islands were captured first), but then landed at Iwo Jima because having to make the entire trip ba…
/r/MensRights17/01/19 12:39 AM
2

The Island was pretty useless as a base for attacking japan and by the time of the battle the garrisons ability to interfere with American operations was pretty limited. Yeah. That's entirely bullshit. Capturing the island halved the distance bombers had to fly to their targets while simultaneously denying its use as a staging ground for Japanese naval and air forces. Thousands of bombers took off and landed there, and land based fighter escorts which couldn't be used before due to the distances…
/r/MensRights16/01/19 10:20 PM
3

They were being killed as the result of a strategic error (Iwo Jima wasn't worth taking). uh. What? It was utterly essential for the war against Japan.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 08:15 PM
11

Anyone remember the story "The Emperors'e New Clothes?" The way that story ends in real life is that the Emperor goes through town naked, and any who don't marvel at the splendor of his (nonexistent) clothing are whisked away and executed for disloyalty. Why doesn't he listen to anyone who points out that the clothes aren't real? The emperor knows he's naked the whole time.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 04:19 PM
36

They do realize it though. They just don't care. You have to realize: The fact that their narratives contradict one another does not matter to them. They don't see language as a means of discerning the truth, but rather as a means to get what they want. Whatever they have to say at a given moment to get what they want becomes "truth" to them and then ceases to be "truth" the instant that it doesn't lead to that end. When we insist on things like objective truth and standards and it contradicts t…
/r/MensRights16/01/19 04:06 PM
19

"Toxic femininity" gets billions in taxpayer funding.
/r/MensRights16/01/19 12:26 AM
649

I like people who give me free shit too.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/01/19 09:24 PM
23

the system is way too slanted to stand straight. Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Say you do find that perfect woman. How's she going to act after 20 years knowing that every single request she makes of you comes with an unspoken "or else" courtesy of Uncle Sam? Give that type of power, the ability to legally harm someone with little chance of legal retribution, to the average man and it becomes readily apparent to everyone why that's a bad idea, but for some reason most o…
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen15/01/19 06:10 PM
6

"But plenty of men leave on their own. It isn't just women!" the feminists whinge. Two things to unpack with that common refrain. 1) There's a pretty good chance that the woman was so toxic the man left on his own even though he wasn't forced out legally. 2) It conflates two groups. a) men who wanted to be fathers but had their children taken away from them and b) men who never wanted to be fathers in the first place but were forced into it because the law doesn't allow them a choice.
/r/MGTOW15/01/19 05:20 PM
4

You can tell they're the majority by how quiet they are!
/r/MensRights09/01/19 10:13 PM
7

I'm not going to encourage someone to make themselves less capable of dealing with the world around them. The world has to change first, and merely wishing for it to change or pretending that it has changed is not going to do that. Encouraging them to open up and then patting myself on the back for how "progressive" i'm being is a selfish action on my part, since it will most likely hurt the person I'm encouraging. It's like saying "Don't worry, jump in to the water, everyone should be allowed t…
/r/MensRights09/01/19 07:06 PM
3

"Masculinity isn't toxic." Proceeds to give their "force for everything good" a feminine label, and their "force for everything bad" a masculine one, while simultaneously condemning gendered labels of anything else.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 07:02 PM
8

Men should be able to open up... if the world was the way we want it to be. It isn't that way though, so telling men to "open up" when it will hurt them even more because of the way the world is in reality is detrimental, and the only purpose it serves is to make the person saying "just open up" feel better about themselves for being "open minded."
/r/MensRights09/01/19 07:00 PM
53

Well... if you lump divorced women into the "single" category then it's a no-brainer.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 06:55 PM
7

Its probably more like employers not wanting to be sued. Even if the hiring process is entirely egalitarian they can still find themselves on the bad end of a legal judgement if the results are "biased." See the relevant case law.
/r/MensRights07/01/19 09:52 PM
1

This has to be satire.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 05:51 PM
3

No matter what behavior women exhibit "post-rape" somehow it's always indicative of victimhood or "evidence that something happened."
/r/MensRights04/01/19 12:00 AM
1

I was skeptical of this place. You guys aren't easy to digest. Every time you see something you consider "shocking" here, look into it a bit. There's a pretty good chance that there's some context you're missing that explains it. As a matter of fact, the main weapon of our opponents it to make sure you aren't informed of that context when you hear something about this place.
/r/MensRights02/01/19 11:22 PM
1

This is the kind of shit that people say to make themselves feel better for being so "considerate" but it does jack shit for it's supposed intended audience, and may in fact leave them worse off. Tell that short, fat, unwashed gremelin of a person that he's fine just the way he is and he'll believe you up to a point... until he figures out that you're fucking lying to him and that he's been doing all the wrong things to try to fit in, at which point he's going to be pretty irate that you've been…
/r/MensRights02/01/19 07:26 PM
4

You know... is #MeToo something that men should want to actually be included in? I'm not going to be ok with a witch hunt just because they let me carry a torch.
/r/MensRights01/01/19 01:41 AM
1

Watch all of Karen Straughan's (girlwriteswhat) YouTube videos. Start from the beginning.
/r/MensRights31/12/18 06:58 PM
9

But if it works to end women's violence why not. A point to focus on. People in general should have equal empathy for men, but the fact of the matter is that they do not. As such, there's nothing wrong with approaching the issue sideways like this.
/r/MensRights21/12/18 08:53 PM
4

The "feminists who aren't like that" only ever appear when it's to distract from the actions of the feminists who most certainly are like that.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 11:19 PM
7

que Karen Straughan smackdown quote. The "feminists who aren't like that" only ever appear when it's to distract from the actions of the feminists who most certainly are like that.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 11:17 PM
1

Didn't you know? Today, not judging someone by characteristics they no control over is prejudiced.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 09:02 PM
8

The entire child support system is an end run around the 4th and 13th amendments.
/r/MensRights20/12/18 08:50 PM
1

Well duh. Earth's gravity didn't change.
/r/MGTOW20/12/18 04:42 PM
1

Everyone says that precious metals are inferior to fiat currency, but if you suggest making it legal to use precious metals as money (It's illegal: 18 U.S. Code § 486) if there's no way it could compete... they always find a way to change the topic. Pointing out that the only thing backing up the power of the US dollar is a government gun preventing you from using anything else... just can't be processed by people who would have to change their entire world-view to accommodate this fact.
/r/MGTOW19/12/18 08:12 PM
2

Pull out some bullshit statistics about you live longer? The way they pull this number is by ignoring the fact that women will naturally select healthier and richer people to begin with (mixing up cause and effect) and they also lump divorced men into the "single" category, so if a man blows his own brains out after losing his children, his property, and any chance at not working for the rest of his life without being thrown in prison due to a divorce... it counts as a "single" man having a shor…
/r/MGTOW19/12/18 07:54 PM
1

She's 23...
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen18/12/18 11:59 PM
1

I also like how they never even mention the GI bill. Yeah, male enrollment was higher after WWII, they literally put their lives on the line. By comparison, go back to the 1920's (before the GI bill) and compare post-secondary rates. It's something like 6/7:female/male.
/r/MensRights18/12/18 11:26 PM
2

Apostates are always hated the most by the zealots. People who have never been feminists can be "forgiven for their ignorance" but the same cannot be said for someone who "should know better."
/r/MensRights18/12/18 05:41 PM
20

I cant think of any A lot of those fields (sociology in particular) were specifically designed to give a veneer of respectability to charlatans who would otherwise not have a way to mimic more rigorous fields of study. It's all just basically a secular seminary. Using the same tricks of "hidden knowledge" and impenetrable vernacular as the clergy of old to put up a facade of aloof professional behavior. Scratch the surface though and it's all the same unfalsifiable nonsense, circular reasoning, …
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen12/12/18 07:21 PM
1

The only problem is you’re needing women to validate yourself. I specifically said that it helped validation, not that it was a requirement, and even then it's not that you need to keep having sex to constantly reassure ones self. It shouldn't be needed to help someone to get over their feelings of inadequacy, but the unfortunate reality is that it usually is. Just do it a once or twice to satisfy your doubt then rest assured in the fact that anyone who throws accusations of inadequacy at you is…
/r/MGTOW11/12/18 06:22 PM
5

"Islanders fall to Penguins in shootout." I don't know why, by my first thought was that something really weird was going down in the Falklands.
/r/MGTOW11/12/18 04:17 PM
3

B. O. A. T. Bust Out Another Thousand
/r/MGTOW11/12/18 04:08 PM
4

Maybe I see it wrong, but please stop validating yourself by the measure of how many times you had/managed to have sex. I disagree with this a little. I think of this as proving to ourselves that we are really going our own way, instead of having our path chosen for us. It's not a necessary step, but as far as long-term peace of mind is concerned, knowing, for a fact, that we could be in a relationship but have simply chosen not to is important. It's much easier to shrug off accusations of "sour…
/r/MGTOW11/12/18 04:01 PM
1

This is the female version of someone who gets a mail-order bride.
/r/MGTOW09/12/18 03:02 PM
1

The numbers have gone from "abysmally low" to merely "depressingly low."
/r/MensRights07/12/18 03:38 AM
6

I think it should be measured in PSI.
/r/MGTOW07/12/18 03:32 AM
18

acres of cock. Is this how we're measuring it now?
/r/MGTOW07/12/18 02:13 AM
2

Yet feminists have no problem whatsoever titling their movement (which they see as good) in a feminine manner and everything they see as bad in a masculine manner (the patriarchy).
/r/MensRights06/12/18 07:32 PM
24

In this case "silence sexual abuse victims" = "actually entertain the possibility that the man could possibly be innocent."
/r/MensRights06/12/18 07:26 PM
3

That's a good read.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen06/12/18 05:38 PM
2

Congratulations feminists, you made the sexists correct. Now when someone says that women are a detriment to the workplace, they can point at the very real set of liabilities that follow any woman through her career and say "we just ran the numbers and looked at the law, don't blame us."
/r/MensRights04/12/18 04:21 PM
3

It just seems that way when conservative outlets are the only ones that bother to present men's issues reliably.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 03:34 PM
11

It's worse actually. Under coverture, the wife lost rights and privileges to the husband, but in turn the husband was given a multitude of responsibilities to the wife. Feminists want (and are well on the way to receiving) coverture without the paired responsibilities.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 03:30 PM
2

Lots of people will accuse you of being "childish" or "selfish" when you place your own needs above serving them. It's highly ironic. They want to be dependent on you and thus return to a state closer to childhood, yet you're the one "acting like a child" if you deny them this.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 01:49 AM
2

True. If we, as a group, make an error, we'll fucking hear about it. Meanwhile every feminist subreddit spends all day, every day, blowing sunshine up each others asses all while remaining perfectly oblivious to anything other than warped caricatures of their critics positions that manages to make it through their self imposed sanity filters.
/r/MensRights04/12/18 12:08 AM
1

I know people here hate "Oppression Olympics" but is there any are of Western society in which women are actually treated worse than men? I can't think of a single thing (except not being allowed to be topless in public) in which men are legally and socially more restricted than women either in the same manner as women or with an analogous issue. Birth control, abortion: Men have zero control over their reproductive futures. Any legal control over reproduction that women have is more than what m…
/r/MensRights04/12/18 12:03 AM
6

"equality"
/r/MensRights03/12/18 11:51 PM
1

They're never satisfied.
/r/MGTOW03/12/18 05:35 PM
48

I think a lot of what fuels the standard "nice guy" phenomena, is guys saying to themselves: "I know I'm no prize, but I'm pretty sure I'm better than that guy."... when they see literal, documented psychopaths having a better selection than they do.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen03/12/18 03:36 PM
2

They're both essentially violations of the 13th amendment. Hell, the whole reasons they made an entirely separate "family court" was because it would be impossible to extract child support or alimony if they were required to go through regular due process.
/r/MensRights29/11/18 10:33 PM
6

Thanks for the nightmare fuel.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen29/11/18 06:27 PM
1

What exactly is going on in here?
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen26/11/18 07:26 PM
1

God damn, the feminists are going to slip a gasket over this one.
/r/MensRights21/11/18 05:37 AM
16

Holy mother of cringe.
/r/MGTOW21/11/18 02:41 AM
1

Oh. Free money if you accuse someone of domestic violence. I can't see any way this might have negative consequences. /s
/r/MensRights21/11/18 12:25 AM
2

You get a "tax break" for money that, for all intents and purposes, is no longer yours. Woo fuckin' hoo.
/r/MGTOW20/11/18 09:02 PM
3

It's that old canard of people who are used to privilege thinking they are discriminated against when that privilege is taken away. So when we say "Ok, I'm not going to support you anymore, you'll have to take care of yourself now." they interpret that as an attack.
/r/MGTOW20/11/18 08:58 PM
2

I was not aware of this. I will definitely read up though.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 09:00 PM
5

A point that needs to be made often. If you have two similar groups of people and then you remove the negative repercussions for a particular type of poor behavior from one of those two groups, you're going to see an uptick in that type of poor behavior from the group shielded from said negative repercussions. Case in point: False accusation. All other things being equal, men and women are probably equally inclined to lie for personal gain. However, while society has a healthy sense of skepticis…
/r/MensRights14/11/18 03:28 PM
3

I don't think any person who survives through dependence on handouts and mandated preferential treatment should be considered single. She's receiving more from the system than she's putting in 9 times out of 10.
/r/MGTOW13/11/18 04:49 PM
21

"Die for us. It is the only way you can be absolved of your sins."
/r/MensRights08/11/18 11:46 PM
3

I like how the first Korean-American woman to be a governor congressman doesn't make the list... because republican apparently.
/r/MGTOW08/11/18 02:55 AM
1

If they want to be in a relationship with a high quality man, they have to be a high quality woman. They don't need to be nearly as good for a simple pump and dump. Too many basic 5s sleep with a rock star once and think that they're his equal because of it.
/r/MGTOW08/11/18 02:35 AM
1

Hidden?
/r/MensRights07/11/18 06:32 PM
1

Notice how the idea of preparing for her own future never even occurs to her.
/r/MGTOW01/11/18 03:43 PM
3

Not really pleased with people dumping on the company for this instance. They're damned if they do, damned if they don't. Direct your ire toward the biased laws that force this situation to happen, and not to the people who are trying to navigate the litigious clusterfuck that feminism created.
/r/MensRights31/10/18 05:06 PM
0

TBF, when a multimillionaire whines about objectification I tend to think they're whiny morons regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights30/10/18 08:56 PM
15

If it were just the fact that men didn't have resources to help them deal with abuse that would be one thing, but the truth of the matter is that the system itself is the means to visit abuse upon men. Women don't have to physically assault men. They can simply press three numbers on a phone and shed a few crocodile tears in front of the government agents that show up. Then they will heap abuse upon the man on her behalf to a degree that she would never have been capable of if left to her own de…
/r/MGTOW30/10/18 08:06 PM
16

So a bunch of students trying to prevent someone from entering a school and prevent them from arguing in favor of civil rights. That someone has to be escorted into the school by armed guard. No, it's not 1963, and no this didn't happen in Birmingham Alabama.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 06:19 PM
3

I'll put milk in my coffee to cool it down if it's too hot. Whatever method gets the coffee in me the fastest is the way I like it.
/r/MGTOW26/10/18 01:55 PM
3

Women are afraid men will be violent. Men are afraid women will accuse them of being violent. The second one is, for all intents and purposes, legal.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 01:35 PM
9

This is pretty blatant even by feminist standards. "You're a woman? Here have some taxpayer money."
/r/MensRights12/10/18 01:17 AM
4

I guess we'd have to find some definition of what counts as "strong." My bare minimum is at least believing that one should bear the responsibility for ones own actions. Any feminist who is against LPS or in favor of affirmative action and the usual litany of taxpayer funded freebies they believe are "rights" doesn't qualify.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 09:57 PM
1

I think you mean to say you want to reduce the privileges of women (which they usually call rights).
/r/MensRights11/10/18 09:50 PM
5

Show me a feminist who thinks women should be responsible for the results of their own decisions. Bonus points: show me a feminist who thinks women should be responsible for the results of their own decisions who hasn't been declared a heretic by other feminists.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 09:42 PM
1

Feminism: making sexists correct since forever.
/r/MensRights11/10/18 09:39 PM
1

Well no one could ever have absolute proof of a negative outside of mathematics or something like that. Of course in that case they actually do need proof for the negative. "I have absolute proof that God does not exist", would be the claim for a negative that now needs evidence. correct. Saying "God does not exist" is different than saying "God cannot exist"
/r/MGTOW11/10/18 08:48 PM
1

I agree. Other variations include the Invisible Pink Unicorn and the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
/r/MGTOW11/10/18 08:36 PM
2

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burden_of_proof_(philosophy) In some instances (mathematics) the burden of proof for a negative claim still remains with the claimant, and it also requires that there be some agreed-upon threshold of truth to disprove the negative claim, otherwise it's considered an "argument from ignorance."
/r/MGTOW11/10/18 04:30 PM
3

If I say that rape culture is a myth (a negative claim) then it would be up to the person who wants to refute this claim to prove its existence, by at least providing an example of it. You are making the mistake of moving the demand for evidence to those rejecting your claims If the claim is that of a negative, then it is the responsibility of the person rejecting the claim to provide evidence disproving it, though it would also be the responsibility of the person establishing the claim for havi…
/r/MGTOW11/10/18 04:23 PM
6

small exception: If someone makes the claim that "something doesn't exist" or "something never happens" it's unreasonable to ask them to back up the claim, because that would be asking them to prove a negative. In that particular case, someone challenging the claim is the one obligated to find an example disproving the claim.
/r/MGTOW11/10/18 04:03 PM
3

Someone who's on the sex offender registry is immediately suspected of any nearby rapes. Their past sexual history is definitely used as evidence against them. You're asking me to provide evidence that people on the sex offender registry are immediately suspected of nearby sex crimes? Dude, what do you think the list was made for in the first place?
/r/MensRights10/10/18 11:19 PM
1

Well, ok. There's one. Not holding my breath for any follow-through though.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 10:56 PM
2

care to point out where he's addressing men's issues and not just issues that may tangentially, at some point, benefit men somewhere? Also, New Zealand isn't in Europe, but I'll let that slide.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 10:40 PM
15

No, it does not. It most certainly does. If you consider yourself leftist and an MRA, go to any leftist subreddit and tell them so. They'll be happy to correct you. it's not as if Melania has been a full-throated supporter of men's rights before this. Her, or any other Republican politician. The right isn't good about men's rights, but they're the only side that hasn't been utterly hostile to the movement. Even seeing a statement of public support for one of our issues is light-years ahead of an…
/r/MensRights10/10/18 10:34 PM
1

Ok, show my the leftist European politician that has publicly given even the tiniest shit about men's issues.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 10:31 PM
10

Do you think OJ Simpson should bear no stigma for the murders he was accused of? Only in people's private opinions. Do you think Cosby should bear no stigma for the alleged rapes he committed (he was only convicted of one). Nope. Only the one he was convinced of, and even that one's iffy. (Remeber there were still 30+ accusers who were proven to have accounts that either changed, or couldn't have happened. How about Weinstein? I'll reserve judgement until I see evidence. The left, and feminism i…
/r/MensRights10/10/18 10:18 PM
9

most leftists still support IUPG the polls say otherwise. Top and bottom, I see nothing but hostility coming from the left except when it convenient to pretend otherwise, like you're doing right now.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 10:14 PM
17

A complainant shouldn't have to prove they were assaulted for the accused to bear the stigma. Yes, they should.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 10:09 PM
3

The majority of people who consider themselves "in favor of men's rights" while still remaining leftist are the r/menslib crowd. Supporting the left and trying to be a MRA is working at cross-purposes. You can't be in support of mens rights while still having a low opinion of the concept of "innocent until proven guilty" among other concepts, and the left has whole heartedly abandoned that concept. The acceptance of the blatantly false accusations against Kavanaugh for instance among some leftis…
/r/MensRights10/10/18 10:07 PM
7

r/menslib regulars don't count. Aside from libertarians, only the right has shown any significant recognition or support for the issues men face.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 09:59 PM
12

I'm going to guess it's the near complete, relentless hostility the left, from top to bottom, has shown for men.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 09:57 PM
8

If it were possible to log all false DV calls to police and count them in the spousal abuse statistics I have a sneaking suspicion that the balance of the stats would be dramatically reversed.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 09:54 PM
2

Somebody who's raped and on the sex offender registry does not have the rape investigated? Someone who's on the sex offender registry is immediately suspected of any nearby rapes. Their past sexual history is definitely used as evidence against them. This is analagous to someone with a history of false accusation being used as evidence that they are likely lying about any future accusations. Either they're both fair, or neither is.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 09:30 PM
31

Micro aggressions. micro... ...aggressions. These are the people who call men fragile. Lets go through the list: The fact that the man says he "helps" with house chores, as if he's a guest IN HIS OWN HOUSE and doesn't share 50% of the responsibility. I guarantee that her 50% only includes the chores she's aware of. Things like the lawn or anything mechanically complicated magically maintain themselves. Or that, despite both of you having jobs, the man usually gives the "I'm too tired" excuse in …
/r/MensRights10/10/18 08:04 PM
5

And people wonder why the mrm leans to the right.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 07:57 PM
3

So they would have the same problems as people on the sex offender registry as it is now. If it's an acceptable downside for people on the list now, it should be an acceptable to liars put on the same list.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 04:46 PM
8

So sick of seeing this shit, maybe if there were actual consequences it would stop. If there were actual consequences: 1) the rate of false accusation would likely drop at least. 2) it would actually be easier to trust accusers because they would actually have something to lose if they were found lying. As it stands now, for all intents and purposes, there is no punishment for it, so there is literally no reason too trivial to accuse someone falsely of rape for someone without morals.
/r/MensRights10/10/18 04:44 PM
6

I've been looking at this more and more since I've seen a view videos of his conviction being posted with gloating redditors circle jerking about how much they hope he suffers in prison, however there appear to be serious issues with his conviction (no actual physical evidence that can't be explained in other perfectly reasonable ways, testimony from the "reliable" witnesses that contradicts proven fact, zero corroborating witnesses, and highly suspect assault scenarios) Any time these issues ar…
/r/MensRights10/10/18 04:34 AM
10

Justice: "Say you're sorry." Accuser: "Ok. Sorry." Justice: "See. It's all better now!" Accused: "Does that mean my friends and family will come back, and I'll be able to go back to school and or my job?" Justice: "Haha, no."
/r/MensRights10/10/18 01:16 AM
2

She's probably had everything provided for her by someone else (parents, boyfriends, the government), and as such, she thinks of employment as a fashion accessory, rather than something most people need to stay alive.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 10:17 PM
3

Ah, you're referring to the 2001 documentary on academic feminism?
/r/MensRights09/10/18 08:36 PM
2

I think he's just agreeing with you.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 08:24 PM
0

What exactly do y'all think the MeToo thing is about? Aging feminists looking for one last chance to use their sexuality as a power-play.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 08:23 PM
17

It's not science. It's a religion that killed science and is wearing its skin.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 08:00 PM
72

I'm not a religious person, but I know that there's a reason that "Thou shall not bear false witness" is one of the ten commandments. The punishment (or lack thereof) that we dole out for false accusation is nowhere near proportional to the amount of harm they cause.
/r/MensRights09/10/18 07:57 PM
3

I don't think Alyssa Milano knows how pendulums work.
/r/MensRights04/10/18 05:00 PM
2

Two quotes that I think sum up the driving force behind the feminist movement (and TBF, the men's rights movement also it we aren't careful). "The surest way to work up a crusade in favor of some good cause is to promise people they will have a chance of maltreating someone. To be able to destroy with a good conscience, to be able to behave badly and call your bad behavior 'righteous indignation' - this is the height of psychological luxury, the most delicious of moral treats." Alduous Huxley "O…
/r/MensRights04/10/18 03:55 PM
3

The irony being that actual McCarthyism was nothing like movie McCarthyism.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 08:00 PM
3

whatever it is, they'd be doing it without electricity.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 10:48 PM
1

"What would you do if all men had a 9pm curfew." Find out that criminals don't follow the law, the hard way (especially when 90% of the police force is at home). That's what.
/r/MensRights02/10/18 08:16 PM
22

"Behind every great man... appears a woman."
/r/MGTOW02/10/18 05:30 PM
5

I'm actually grateful for some of the women in my family. Both my grandmother and mother basically told me a lesser version of this. I got into a fight with my sister (that she started, by hitting me). Being 6 or 7, I assumed that since she hit me first, it was ok to hit back. My grandmother saw the fight and pulled me aside, and said: "You can't hit her back, even if she hits you." I was upset, and feeling that that was unfair, I told her so. In response, she told me something to the effect of.…
/r/MGTOW02/10/18 05:25 PM
5

You're the type of person who would have been right at home during the "satanic panic" of the 80's. Keep your medieval ideas of justice out of this subreddit.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 11:03 PM
3

by his own standards though, simply being accused means he should walk into highway traffic.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 06:46 PM
10

Have you started a go-fund-me yet? That's how we'll know you're really serious.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 06:44 PM
5

The party of mob rule back then. The party of mob rule today.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 06:43 PM
32

how exactly would an investigation proceed with zero actual evidence to investigate? You just want a delay and will say absolutely anything to get it, men's rights be damned.
/r/MensRights29/09/18 06:41 PM
1

You use your head. She had a therapy session six years ago in which no one was named, and which had even less detail then her current account of events; detail, by the way, which (even though sparse) contradicts her current account. she's putting her family through the wringer to do this. she's also putting a ton of money into her bank accounts. Oh, and her own parents won't back her up on her accusation. I am continually surprised by the aggressive gullibility of the left, and also simultaneous…
/r/MensRights29/09/18 06:30 PM
2

Hmm, no, I think it's pretty established Odd that you'd say that considering that rape isn't actually the thing he's accused of. I think it's safe to say that something happened. Lol, because "wOmeN nEveR lIe aBoUt tHis SorT oF tHiNg."
/r/MensRights28/09/18 09:19 PM
1

Whether or not the "rape" even happened seems to be a detail you skipped over. The "memory" of liars is always crystal clear on the "important" parts.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 08:46 PM
1

Maybe I'm just naive, but to me this "running a train" stuff sounds like an urban legend/conspiracy theory. Their accusations sound like plots to Lifetime movies.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 04:14 PM
2

They're now a significant demographic.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 04:13 PM
5

Eh. Don't lose faith. A lot of these posts recently have been hitting r/all. We're getting a lot of outsiders here.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 03:59 PM
1

The most important detail - the identity of her assailant - is really all I care about. Yeah, thats the problem, you don't care about the other details.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 03:46 PM
1

Just an FYI: Repeating "there have been credible allegations" over and over again doesn't magically make it true.
/r/MensRights28/09/18 03:45 PM
10

Eh, I've seen some of the text messages. I'd advise staying clear of this one.
/r/MensRights27/09/18 01:20 AM
4

They're acting like it's a sacrifice to get tons of government benefits while the person earning said benefits is in some hellhole on the other side of the planet.
/r/MGTOW27/09/18 01:10 AM
10

Hilarious if true. I'd sit on this one a bit though to make sure.
/r/MGTOW27/09/18 12:56 AM
25

"Do I have to step into the bear trap first before I can have an opinion about the wisdom of doing so?"
/r/MGTOW26/09/18 10:55 PM
141

It's also equally sad when the company doesn't hire you, but you hang around anyway and ask them if they have any work for you to do for free. Don't be an orbiter.
/r/MGTOW26/09/18 10:49 PM
6

Remember the old canard: A male feminist is someone who hears "All men are rapists" and thinks "yeah, that sounds about right."
/r/MensRights26/09/18 04:11 PM
5

Cool it with the epithets.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 04:09 PM
16

Women taught how to lead. Men being taught how to better serve women. "EqualityTM" for everyone.
/r/MensRights26/09/18 04:06 PM
1

... and he hit himself in the foot with a shovel for your mortgage!
/r/MGTOW25/09/18 09:39 PM
5

Not just a regular internet nobody either. A senator. This kind of thinking isn't fringe feminism. It's mainstream.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 09:03 PM
2

Funny how that "Behind every great man stands a woman" quip doesn't include the ones who start wars.
/r/MGTOW19/09/18 08:40 PM
1

Someone as handsy as Joe Biden should probably know better than to advocate for something like this.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 07:40 PM
2

I like how feminists made up the word "mansplaining" when the there's already a gendered way to describe someone as condescending: Patronizing
/r/MensRights19/09/18 07:36 PM
3

Has she even "remembered" what year the supposed attack happened yet?
/r/MensRights19/09/18 07:29 PM
12

...with close to zero risk to themselves even if their lie is discovered. That's the key part. Rape is terrible, but at least there's a pretty firmly established pattern of actually punishing people convicted of it. Not so for false accusation.
/r/MensRights19/09/18 07:17 PM
1

Actual scenario if men suddenly up and vanished: Almost 100% of power plant operators, distributors, and dispatchers are men. Immediate planetwide power outage. 91% of the nation’s electrical engineers are men and 97.6% of electrical power line installers and maintenance workers are men. Said power outage would never be fixed. 95.5% of water and liquid waste treatment plant and system operators are men. So there goes water after electicity. Probably just as well though since the plants won't hav…
/r/MGTOW18/09/18 06:59 PM
1

So things go smoothly for about 10 minutes eh?
/r/MGTOW18/09/18 06:48 PM
4

A major caveat here too: LPS is only assumed to be a viable option when things like abortion and birth control are also legal. In a society where women don't legally have those options LPS makes no sense.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 06:19 PM
8

"If no one's allowed to talk about the problem, it's like there is no problem."
/r/MGTOW18/09/18 04:14 PM
4

You're a grown ass man. You work, it's your money. That's the problem. Legally this isn't necessarily true once married. If she gets pissed off enough and leaves a large portion of that money becomes hers, even if the reason she is pissed was because you wouldn't use "your" money in the way she wanted. If someone else ultimately gets to determine how your money is used... is it even yours?
/r/MGTOW12/09/18 03:27 PM
23

Yup. It's like a relationship's "off" switch.
/r/MGTOW11/09/18 09:45 PM
22

Just pointing out how one of the reasons people get into relationships: having someone to talk to about your problems... is a farce. You don't get to voice what's really concerning you.
/r/MGTOW11/09/18 07:57 PM
1

Is "bear" a gender now?
/r/MGTOW11/09/18 06:40 PM
88

Just do what most men in "successful" relationships do. Have pre-planned responses for these types of inquiries that focus on light-hearted and non-threatening problems so that she can feel like you "opened up" to her while you keep the real problems that are bothering you bottled up inside, knowing that if you ever said them out loud, she'd leave you in a heartbeat. Repeat until dead.
/r/MGTOW11/09/18 06:37 PM
29

Tradition is the corpse of a good idea. Following a tradition simply because it's a tradition is a recipe for stagnation and failure. That being said, the reasons that the traditions were started in the first place may still be valid (if one knows that they are) or may not be valid (due to changing technology, etc) and so shaping our present behavior with those reasons in mind is a good idea; and while it may outwardly appear to be "adhering to tradition" it is anything but.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen11/09/18 06:18 PM
1

(there is no evidence for or against this) Horse shit
/r/MensRights11/09/18 01:50 AM
1

OP cut out a lot of pertinent info about the doxxing website. In summary: she had a pretty good reason for becoming pretty much instantly disillusioned with the causes of her former "allies."
/r/MensRights11/09/18 01:45 AM
4

Mutually assured destruction... at best. Unilaterally assured destruction more likely.
/r/MensRights09/09/18 03:34 AM
3

This seems like bullshit. Circumcision is bad enough without making stuff up about it.
/r/MensRights03/09/18 05:58 PM
0

Power corrupts. In marriage, one side tends to have pretty much all the power and with the threat of one-sided divorce in the background, ever little request comes with an unspoken "or else" along with it.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 10:17 PM
5

Turned into? That's what it started out as.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 10:13 PM
3

6M boys and men seems really low... The US alone probably has ten times that.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 02:46 AM
3

It really is a blunt summary of it's purpose, just without all the nice sounding excuses and rhetorical misdirection usually used to make it sound more noble than it is. It's simply one of the countless methods of mandatory wealth transfer and differing of responsibility (read: privilege) that women legally enjoy over men.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 02:40 AM
4

Maternity leave is literally a government mandate that other people must take responsibility for a particular woman's actions.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 02:20 AM
1

It doesn't seem fair that a company with multiple employees is running so razor thin that they can't have someone out for 6 months. An absence of that long is routinely leaved a budget hole of tens of thousands of dollars per person. That is not a tiny amount of money, and that money doesn't just come out of nowhere. Either everyone else's workload is increased or their pay is reduced to cover for the absence. Most companies will set aside money beforehand to cover these expected expenses, but t…
/r/MensRights31/08/18 02:18 AM
3

In all likelihood, your paycheck is also reduced to cover for the cost of the temporary replacement workers too. Not only does the company have to keep paying the pregnant woman for not working, they also have to pay for others to cover for her. That money doesn't just pop out of nowhere.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 02:13 AM
1

A lot of OP's images need context, and I know the background on a few of them that explains why they were said. Not sure why but OP's account is pretty new and something about it irks me.
/r/MensRights31/08/18 12:19 AM
1

If the way we're measuring "worse" is by measuring which happens more often, then yes MGM is orders of magnitude worse than FGM. Measuring which of the amputations is worse physically however is a crapshoot.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 04:28 PM
11

They get money and publicity. Consider also the fact that they are on their way out. One last chance to use their sexuality as a power play.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 04:19 PM
17

Another thing about the Cosby situation. While he was eventually convicted in court for his actions in one instance, there were about 60 others who accused him, about half of whom were provably lying right off the bat (Cosby not being in the same state at the time of the alleged behavior, etc). The aspect of the case that no one looks at is that it brings to light the fact that it is indeed possible to scrape up several dozen false accusers in a high profile case.
/r/MensRights30/08/18 04:17 PM
19

Degrees are more expensive than they've ever been, however learning has never been cheaper.
/r/MGTOW29/08/18 09:42 PM
6

I have a sneaking suspicion that convincing the third world to end FGM would be much easier if it weren't for the blatantly obvious hypocrisy of the 1st world having MGM being entirely legal.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 04:31 PM
1

actperson.
/r/MGTOW29/08/18 04:20 PM
6

Then 4chan picked it up as an insult and shortened it to "cuck", this made it a very popular term as it was quick and short and really described the liberal mindset perfectly.It's more specific than "weak" but takes the idea to its logical conclusion. It's not just "weak" it's "piously weak" i.e. the mindset that not only are people mistreating you, but also that you are a better person for allowing them to mistreat you.
/r/MGTOW28/08/18 01:50 AM
2

Something being legal (or illegal) is evidence neither for, nor against its morality.
/r/MGTOW21/08/18 10:51 PM
7

Probably the main reason for the DV imbalance (at least in the statistics): Most of the ways that women abuse the men in their lives are entirely legal.
/r/MGTOW21/08/18 08:58 PM
5

One of my favorite teachers was stabbed to death by his wife who had PPD. The only thing anyone talked about afterward was how hard it must be for her.
/r/MGTOW17/08/18 06:49 PM
1

Some men can only define their own masculinity through their worship of femininity.
/r/MGTOW17/08/18 05:19 PM
1

"Hey we thought you were lonely, so while you were out we filled your house with alligators and bees."
/r/MGTOW16/08/18 05:33 PM
1

As horrifically unjust as this is... I hope it happens more. Society at large is only capable of seeing the monumental unfairness of this setup when women suffer, so if that what it takes to build up the steam to get a movement to abolish it, then so be it.
/r/MensRights14/08/18 07:21 PM
18

Imagine you are a carpenter, and you build chairs. It takes you 10 hours to make a chair. Now imagine a man holds a gun to your head and demands that you build a chair for him. Now imagine that a man walks up to you with a gun after you have finished making a chair and demands that you give it to him. Now imagine that a man walks up to you with a gun after you have sold the chair and demands that you give him the money that you made from the sale. In the first case, the man with the gun clearly …
/r/MensRights14/08/18 07:00 PM
21

they don't even see the things that happen to the men around them. It never even occurs to them to look.
/r/MensRights13/08/18 05:53 PM
9

The kind of people who pretend "gamersgate" was about "not letting girls play games" and not about a sex for reviews scandal and pushing a sterilized culture. I'd say the main issue about gamergate wasn't even the "sex for reviews" but rather the blatant, coordinated smear campaign across the gaming journalist community in response to criticism for what would otherwise have been a minor incident about some whore with purple hair. The sex-for-reviews wasn't noteworthy, the media's wildly dispropo…
/r/MensRights07/08/18 04:42 PM
4

The original movement "claimed" to be about equality, but was in actuality a movement to remove women's gender-specific obligations while maintaining their corresponding gender-specific privileges.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 04:39 PM
1

Feminism is for men and women but women have to come first since they have to deal with horrible conditions like spending $8 more per year on toiletries.
/r/MensRights07/08/18 04:36 PM
2

Women also have a wide array of perfectly legal ways to ruin their partner's life. I think that's the main reason for the discrepancy.
/r/MensRights06/08/18 05:21 PM
2

One last go at using their sexuality as a power play.
/r/MensRights04/08/18 05:33 PM
1

OctothorpeMeToo
/r/MGTOW04/08/18 04:28 PM
7

You'd be surprised by the bizarre lengths to which certain types of people will go to appear "intellectual" or "progressive." It's a competition you see: Travel to the middle of the rain forest to discover, and get ritually sodomized by, a previously undiscovered tribe just to one-up your other "woke" friends about how culturally enriched you are.
/r/MGTOW02/08/18 09:59 PM
12

HR did do their research. They hired her knowing full well what kind of a person she was.
/r/MensRights02/08/18 06:30 PM
5

...if you meet her as a billionaire.
/r/MGTOW30/07/18 07:49 PM
23

This is nothing more than a good business decision. It's literally illegal for them to charge differently. Financial sense never enters the equation (unless you count avoiding lawsuits as a financial decision)
/r/MensRights26/07/18 11:01 PM
2

Step 6: When your boss calls any of this into question, sue the bejeezus out of them and go to sleep on a literal pile of money.
/r/MGTOW26/07/18 10:20 PM
24

Lets not kid ourselves. For all intents and purposes this is going to only go one way.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 08:04 PM
1

Privilege: Middle English: via Old French from Latin privilegium ‘bill or law affecting an individual,’ from privus ‘private’ + lex, leg- ‘law.’ Private Law. If the law is significantly different, or applied significantly differently to you than it is to others (presumably in a way that benefits you) then you are privileged relative to them. This is the real concrete privilege that women have over men, not the abstract and undefinable notion of privilege that feminists like to use to pretend tha…
/r/MensRights26/07/18 06:50 PM
2

They count the husbands earnings and possessions as belonging to the wife. So of course when a divorce kicks off, the wife if the wife doesn't get all the money that was "hers" before, then she's destitute. Conversely, when saying how much they "sacrificed," for purposes of calculating alimony, the years of rent-free living, free food, and healthcare provided by someone else never even enters the equation when compared against "lost wages" due to child care.
/r/MensRights26/07/18 06:01 PM
6

Everyone is equal. Diversity is essential. Pick one. If everyone is the same, then diversity won't do shit, good or bad.
/r/MGTOW25/07/18 10:31 PM
1

Marriage has always been a drain on men's resources and happiness. In the past though men who got married were entitled to some modest privileges to compensate for the burden of responsibilities he undertook. Traditionally, children "belonged" to the husband. If a marriage fell apart, then the man was the one who both got custody and also had to pay for the children. Additionally, at least a portion of his wife's property became "his" to manage also, again, for the sake of raising the children. …
/r/MGTOW25/07/18 05:46 PM
5

They get that number by lumping broke, suicidal divorced men into the "single" category.
/r/MGTOW25/07/18 05:30 PM
2

"Having a nice house, nice car, and successful business won't make you happy!... however giving them to me will." Ever seen someone frowning on a jet ski? Didn't think so. The con is so obvious once you know to look for it.
/r/MGTOW25/07/18 05:29 PM
1

This is also why they are hilariously unable to organize the pussy cartel that would give them real power :) Eh, I don't know if this works. In any country/state where prostitution is illegal, that's a de-facto cartel that does, in fact, give women real power.
/r/MGTOW24/07/18 07:59 PM
1

We're at least three generations in with a society that has nearly guaranteed that women (and some men too, tbf) won't have to live with the full consequences of their own actions, reproductively or otherwise. We're actively selecting for the breeding of the stupidest and least capable, while simultaneously putting the burden of their choices on the capable and intelligent, who wait to reproduce until they are financially capable of doing so. It's absurd to think this won't have evolutionary eff…
/r/MGTOW24/07/18 07:53 PM
9

You don't get sympathy for hardship that you willingly imposed on yourself. "Why do men always leave me when I mention that I enjoy drinking bleach and he'd have to take into account my special dietary needs. Men these days can't be counted on for anything!"
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen24/07/18 07:32 PM
2

Pretty sure all the states are no-fault now.
/r/MGTOW24/07/18 04:25 PM
12

How dare y.... oh, assault rifle. Never mind.
/r/MGTOW24/07/18 04:22 PM
2

It's definitely an overly broad definition they're using. Hell, take the definition for "sexual assault" used to get the statistics for women, and apply it to men. Getting hit in the nuts intentionally would count as "sexual assault." Is there any male anywhere who hasn't had this happen to them? It's a hilariously low standard for tallying abuse.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 04:49 PM
8

You know, there's a reason "Thou shalt not bear false witness" was featured prominently on a very specific set of rules back in the day. It is a crime we definitely don't take seriously enough, and I say this as someone who is not religious at all.
/r/MensRights20/07/18 04:44 PM
1

AWALT works better as an acronym than SWAOBAOTCRMLLFARATINWTTTD (Some Women Are Ok But All Of Them Could Ruin My Life Legally For Any Reason And There Is No Way To Tell The Difference)
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen19/07/18 07:01 PM
2

Where she's getting this "most of ya'll won't stand with male victims" bullshit is her ass and no where else. The MRM doesn't have a taxpayer funded multi-billion dollar grievance industry to pump out propaganda 24/7, so she's interpreting the lack of her awareness of what the MRM is saying as the equivalent of the MRM not saying anything.
/r/MensRights16/07/18 06:41 PM
2

20% of husbands know that if they don't answer the question "right" they're never going to get to see their kids again.
/r/MGTOW16/07/18 06:18 PM
4

morbidly curvy.
/r/WhereAreAllTheGoodMen16/07/18 05:44 PM
1

mostly because they don't have any actual principles in the first place. Oh they do have principles. They can't articulate them though because "we want your shit and will say absolutely anything to get it" tends to drive people away if spoken plainly.
/r/MGTOW12/07/18 05:29 PM
2

The way I see it is that in any society, theoretical or otherwise, you're going to have to part with a portion of your labor to protect your property from those who would deprive you of it. Either you must work to do it yourself or exchange a part of the product of your labor with someone else in order to have them protect your property for you. So having to pay constantly, by itself, is not "paying rent" on your own property but rather it's just an aspect of maintaining that property similar to…
/r/MGTOW12/07/18 03:39 PM
2

Money in their hands is just going to be wasted. No reason not to relieve them of it so it can be put to better use.
/r/MGTOW12/07/18 03:30 PM
2

They’re walking away from authoritarianism and intersectionality and the oppressed/oppressor Marxist dynamic. It's kind of hard to nail down what exactly people are walking away from. The reason for this is because the type of people who act in the "progressive" manner love to jump between labels. As soon as one particular label becomes associated with their behavior, they jump ship to another label that they either make up or co-opt. "Liberal", "Progressive", "Left Libertarian", "Socialist", "S…
/r/MGTOW12/07/18 03:26 PM
2

I think about buying property alot, although I'm not sure I have THAT much cash for a down payment Well you're the one with the business degree. You'd know more than I do. There has to be some kind of first home buyer benefits out there. I just bought a house in order to rent out extra rooms. It pays my mortgage so that my living expenses are essentially zero, but there's no profit. If you could manage to get a bigger property however... anyway something to think about.
/r/MGTOW12/07/18 04:24 AM
1

Ever considered trying your hand at being a landlord? Seems like something your degree would play into, and it's definitely not something that AI is likely to pick up anytime soon.
/r/MGTOW11/07/18 10:20 PM
1

It's funny how all the feminists who "aren't like that" routinely quote the feminists who are.
/r/MensRights10/07/18 02:48 PM
1

I seriously doubt anyone can make a claim that a company is racist/sexist if it is certain they do not have access to any identifying features of the individual. You'd think that, because that's what a regular person would find logical. The goal of the feminists doesn't actually have anything to do with fairness, regardless of how many times they say it is, so when blind evaluations like you want are tried and they don't end up with the results that ideologues would like them to, the program get…
/r/MensRights05/07/18 07:26 PM
1

still don't see why this can't be done with a person who's gender and skin color is kept secret. It can be done, sure... as long as it results in politically correct proportions. See Griggs v. Duke Power Co. and other similar court cases. It doesn't matter how impartial your test is, if the results are not "diverse" you're going to get sued.
/r/MensRights05/07/18 02:27 PM
2

True. The firing would be justified, but she could still sue, and end up costing the company lots of money just to deal with the suit even though it would ultimately be thrown out. The legal costs are money that they'll never get back, so as long as it's cheaper to keep her employed than the legal costs for firing her, she stays on the payroll. Additionally, if she isn't a complete moron, she'll have found some way to manufacture evidence that could be construed as "discriminatory" at least at f…
/r/MensRights03/07/18 04:13 PM
1

Why do we allow this? It's effectively illegal not to. If you hire based on merit and needed skill-sets and not enough blue haired pretty princesses get hired, then you're looking at a major lawsuit.
/r/MensRights03/07/18 03:55 PM
9

I'm not the person you're responding to, but here's how it usually goes: If they fire her she can sue. She probably won't win... eventually... if they decide to litigate, but in the legal costs would would be extensive for the company and they'd likely have to fork over a huge settlement just to make it go away. So for now the cheapest option is simply to keep paying her for not working. Welcome to the reality of "discrimination"
/r/MensRights03/07/18 03:52 PM
16

The cool thing about reality is that no matter how much you try to bend it to fit your pseudo-scientific theories, it still persists as reality. The thing I've found about people who tend to gravitate toward pseudo-scientific theories is that while they can never actually force reality to adjust to it, they are more than happy to settle with creating a society where acknowledging reality or acting in accordance with it is severely punished in one way or another. The closest they can ever get to …
/r/MensRights03/07/18 12:33 AM
3

Women's nightmare scenario of having no legal control whatsoever over their reproductive rights is just plain ol' everyday reality for men.
/r/MensRights02/07/18 10:14 PM
135

Before you all pile on this dude, realize that outside of this short clip there's basically an army of white knights waiting to jump him if he retaliates.
/r/MGTOW02/07/18 06:05 PM
3

A thing to note as well. the 1970's were a high point for male enrollment due to the Vietnam war and GI bill education bonuses. Men had to literally die or at least put themselves at significant risk of dying in order for that initial imbalance to occur. The slight uptick in male enrollment during the mid 2000's is likely due to the same reasons in Iraq and Afghanistan. The current disparity is just for "payback." No war, no risk, just freebies given in reparation for imagined slights of the pas…
/r/MensRights27/06/18 04:05 PM
9

flight risk I don't think you know what this means.
/r/MGTOW20/06/18 02:36 AM
1

Someone who hates capitalism is going to be in for a rude awakening when they find out that they still have to work for food and shelter with nary an economic system in sight.
/r/MGTOW20/06/18 02:33 AM
8

Is Donald Trump a flight risk? Has be been arrested?
/r/MGTOW20/06/18 02:21 AM
9

these people are seeking asylum seeking asylum =/= deserving asylum
/r/MGTOW20/06/18 02:20 AM
3

you're pretty emotional. You're in full "Won't someone think of the children" mode, even though the whole policy exists specifically because someone was thinking about what to do with the children. your policy is trash. I'm totally sure you're opinion has value considering it's on a policy you were completely unaware existed 20 minutes ago. /s
/r/MGTOW20/06/18 02:15 AM
2

So where are the kids? Did you not bother to click on the link of that policy letter I sent you detailing exactly what they try to do for the kids of arrested parents? You do realize that there are thousands of separated kids who have gone missing and the idiots in charge have no idea where they are? News flash, illegal immigrants typically try to avoid the authorities as a matter of the nature of their crimes. Police may try to keep track of them but they aren't going to have a 100% success rat…
/r/MGTOW20/06/18 01:52 AM
2

Because they might get abused by other criminals While in their parents care? Yes? If someone commits a crime, even a misdemeanor, for which they have to go to jail, their kids don't also go to jail with them, even if the parent really really wants the kid to be with them in jail. This is literally treating illegal immigrants in the same way as every other criminal. Also, how likely is it that they would get abused while with their parents? certainly higher than outside of it, you know, where th…
/r/MGTOW20/06/18 01:33 AM
5

Neat article. How exactly does it address anything that I said? Are you arguing that because border control agents get away with abuse, that it's ok to put kids in a position to be further abused? It would certainly be a viewpoint I have not heard before!
/r/MGTOW20/06/18 01:14 AM
6

In some special cases infants are allowed to remain with their mothers if they cannot be parted, however this is contrary to the general policy of not putting children in jail near other criminals even if their parents are arrested.
/r/MGTOW20/06/18 01:08 AM
5

people go to jail after a trial and not before. You may want to do a little research before you post doozies like this. People arrested for a crime do go to jail before their trial. They may be allowed to leave if they post bail and aren't a flight risk... ...the overwhelming majority of illegal immigrants are significant flight risks.
/r/MGTOW20/06/18 01:02 AM
36

Crossing the border illegally is a misdemeanor. Coming back over however after being deported is a felony. let alone lose their kids without going to trial. The children are separated before the trial because it's generally a bad idea to house children with other criminals.
/r/MGTOW19/06/18 11:12 PM
4

You really need to look back into those history books of yours. I don't even know where to start correcting you on this one.
/r/MGTOW19/06/18 06:52 PM
5

some all individuals FTFY. With very few exceptions, children do not get put into prison with their parents and the government arranges other accommodations for them often with other children at the same time. This is literally the same thing.
/r/MGTOW19/06/18 06:49 PM
7

Somehow taking Jewish people in Germany and in most cases seperating parents from children into holding facilities is somehow way different than taking hispanic Illegals and doing the exact same thing. TIL the thing we do for every single parent put in jail for a crime is basically the holocaust.
/r/MGTOW19/06/18 06:21 PM
128

You know who else has their kids separated from them? Literally every other person who is jailed for a crime.
/r/MGTOW19/06/18 04:40 PM
29

a vindictive bitch that was the real problem unfortunately an inextricable part of the "having kids" deal for most men. If you want to raise kids, you have to support her too.
/r/MGTOW18/06/18 07:28 PM
3

That child has a right to live. That child has a right to a mother. That child has a right to a father. Single mothers are legally allowed to seek IVF, so this it not the case. The child's rights are dependent on the mother's preferences.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 04:56 PM
3

Or we can jail irresponsible women and take their kids away. It might be more viable to take the kids away and force the mother to work to support it. That way the taxpayer isn't on the hook. It'd also serve as an incentive for potential mothers to not put themselves in this situation to begin with if they actually have to face the responsibilities generated by the decisions that only they had the right to make in the first place.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 04:54 PM
2

She gets to decide whether or not to go through with this while men's bodies aren't affected TIL a quarter century of involuntary servitude doesn't have any effect on a man's body.
/r/MensRights18/06/18 04:50 PM
14

raising young boys with blame and a feeling of guilt for something they never did. There's a reason for this. It's a re-purposing of the concept of original sin. They damn a man as evil, then demand that he practice a good which they then define as something that is impossible for him to practice. They hold that by his existence; by mere circumstance of birth, he is guilty of an array of nebulous and undefinable sins (toxic masculinity). Then they attempt to cash in on his sense of guilt in a ma…
/r/MensRights14/06/18 11:02 PM
1

See: US Family Court system.
/r/MensRights13/06/18 03:58 PM
18

Guy: So what exactly do you bring to the table? Girl: Ugh, typical. I bring myself and that's all I need to. What exactly do you bring to the table? Guy: ... I brought the table.
/r/MGTOW13/06/18 01:24 PM
1

Women and men have different bodies. This means they can’t be treated exactly the same when it comes to pregnancy. Please tell me which gene expression extracts money from the man's bank account and gives it to the mother? Focusing on the physical differences between men and women in this manner is a giant non sequitur. If her pregnancy results in a child being born, society has policies in place to protect that child who is innocent, hasn’t done anything wrong and needs money to survive. Are yo…
/r/MensRights11/06/18 05:28 PM
1

I think they were the "useful idiots" of yesteryear and they're starting to become aware of how the things they advocated for were used as a bat-and-switch for more nefarious things.
/r/MensRights10/06/18 06:06 PM
10

I do actually remember seeing this, but it was a long time ago so I don't remember the source. Homes with single fathers were roughly on par with two parent households, however there wasn't any further study into whether this is because fathers were better, or if it was because (in order to get single custody in today's family courts) fathers have to be much, much more qualified for parenthood than the average before they are allowed to be single parents.
/r/MGTOW10/06/18 03:59 PM
3

Won't someone think of the poor Nazi collaborators! /s I wonder how long after the invasion she waited to bob on some SS knob.
/r/MensRights07/06/18 06:09 PM
1

Well that's basically the foundation of MGTOW. The idea behind AWALT isn't necessarily that there are literally no women worth being a relationship, but rather that for the risks involved any women available to you personally isn't worth it. With the state of marriage the way it is, the risks are astronomical, and therefore the only women worth committing to are the ones who are astronomically worthy of it. That vanishingly small fraction of women who make that cut however aren't realistically g…
/r/MGTOW07/06/18 05:54 PM
3

Pizza the Hutt.
/r/MGTOW07/06/18 05:43 PM
2

I feel that's an equally unsustainable course. I agree with that too. It's a binary decision between 1) an unsustainable course where we're ground down and used up, and 2) an unsustainable course where we're not. A third option would be nice, but it's unlikely.
/r/MGTOW05/06/18 05:38 PM
7

He understands the viewpoint of MGTOW, but doesn't agree with it as a good longterm solution. I mean, that's right though. Long term, society still falls apart. MGTOW is just the thumb in the dike. It may help the individuals who adopt the mentality, but it isn't going to do shit for society.
/r/MGTOW05/06/18 05:15 PM
1

Because the people criticizing you for "wanting to subjugate women" actually like the fact that men are lacking some basic human rights, but they know they wouldn't be able to win an argument for their stated goal, so they obfuscate.
/r/MensRights04/06/18 08:33 PM
1

It's important to remember that the inverse is also true. A paradigm's appropriateness has nothing to do with its age.
/r/MGTOW29/05/18 08:50 PM
4

I'd imagine lesbians find themselves on the receiving end of a lot of the same bullshit that men do.
/r/MGTOW29/05/18 12:42 PM
0

On Fordism though it at least seems like he was wrong. All the boring, dull, repetitive jobs are being automated away.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 01:41 AM
3

"I'm marginally competent at something. Give me attention!"
/r/MensRights25/05/18 01:33 AM
4

We actually have the exact opposite of that now with rape shield laws. A history of past false accusations is, for all intents and purposes, inadmissible in court. A very limiting set of circumstances have to be bet for that kind of evidence to be allowed, and you'll only get there if the accuser is already immensely bad at lying.
/r/MensRights25/05/18 01:29 AM
5

Throwing a grenade in the air and then shooting the grenade to make it explode, thereby taking down an airplane... Then you get saved by a female amputee commando with blue face paint and a cricket bat. Also there's a guy with a katana! I'm diasappointed in the lack of wheelchair-bound transexuals in fur suits though. Not inclusive enough!
/r/MensRights24/05/18 05:50 PM
9

If the dad isn't working late at night the daughter wouldn't be having a piano recital in the first place. Shit's expensive, and way too many people take "having things paid for" for granted if someone else is doing the paying.
/r/MGTOW23/05/18 06:36 PM
2

I think Trump has one.
/r/MGTOW22/05/18 08:05 PM
1

And then people complain when rents are sky high because landlords have to anticipate and mitigate the costs of housing these deadbeats for a year or more due to tenancy laws. I have zero sympathy for people who complain about high rents but then want landlords to have to put up with the insane costs of people not holding up their end of the lease agreement.
/r/MGTOW21/05/18 11:35 PM
13

It seems like he doesn't know there's a difference...
/r/MGTOW21/05/18 11:08 PM
7

Link to the video?
/r/MGTOW21/05/18 10:51 PM
7

We don't need more people. I like the fact that there's still wilderness.
/r/MGTOW17/05/18 03:46 PM
4

sure about that? I'm not usually logged in when I'm just browsing.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 11:45 PM
18

I see menrights on the front page all the time now. Whenever that happens there's going to be an influx of low quality posts, trolls, and the people unfamiliar with the history of the movement of subreddit flowing in. It was bound to happen eventually.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 11:18 PM
2

The book, not the movie. :)
/r/MensRights15/05/18 11:10 PM
8

If you mean however that service and voting should be tied, I am inclined to agree. This is what I meant, with the caveat that the "buying in" doesn't really count unless there's an option to not buy in. You vote, you sign up. You don't vote, you're exempt.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 11:00 PM
3

I'd say it should be tied to the vote. i.e. You want to vote? well then for the period of time that the person you voted for is in power you're signing up for the possibility that you'll bear the consequences of that person's actions while they're in power. If you don't want to take that risk, then you haven't accepted the burden of responsibility that the right to use political force (voting) entails.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 10:49 PM
28

Fastest way to get rid of an injustice is to ensure that those benefiting from it are subjected to it's downsides.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 10:44 PM
1

Non-mutants need not apply.
/r/MGTOW15/05/18 04:32 PM
16

you'll be number two. she comes first, then any kids, then whatever entitlements she's getting at the time, then pets probably... then maybe you get a chance. You're number four at best.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 03:49 PM
3

Not all feminists are like that!!!! ... just the ones who matter.
/r/MensRights15/05/18 03:45 PM
15

I'd like to call them something like "Young Patriarchs" just to give the feminists a brain hemorrhage.
/r/MGTOW11/05/18 05:50 PM
20

Department of Redundancy Department.
/r/MGTOW11/05/18 02:50 PM
88

so "Scouts Boy Scouts of America"?
/r/MGTOW11/05/18 02:49 PM
416

Shapiro: "In the name 'Boy Scouts'" Feminists: "Ok, we'll fix that."
/r/MGTOW11/05/18 02:46 PM
5

Honestly, if everything else was included the rest of the image wouldn't be visible no matter how small the font was.
/r/MGTOW11/05/18 02:44 PM
7

And the mans income is counted as being hers beforehand.
/r/MensRights11/05/18 02:42 PM
4

for now. You know the demands will always keep escalating though.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 06:27 PM
2

Because an organization designed to instill confidence and competence in young people isn't exactly compatible with a glorified MLM scheme to sell cookies.
/r/MensRights10/05/18 06:27 PM
4

This is actually a myth for the most part. The overwhelming majority of native tribes had well developed property systems. The notable exceptions were the more warlike tribes who subsisted on theft from their neighbors.
/r/MGTOW08/05/18 04:25 PM
1

A small step in the right direction.
/r/MensRights03/05/18 02:35 PM
13

"Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. The savage’s whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of his tribe. Civilization is the process of setting man free from men." Ayn Rand.
/r/MGTOW03/05/18 02:31 PM
7

I second this. at 18 years old the average male has been on the receiving end of no less than 13 years of mandatory government sponsored propaganda. Feminist horse shit is sprinkled throughout every piece of literature they read, every "history" lesson they receive, and even fucking math problems nowadays. If they go to college, add another 4 on top of that. That is one hell of a mental hole to climb out of, and it's no surprise that for most it takes an incredibly jarring personal event to knoc…
/r/MGTOW25/04/18 06:18 PM
5

A conservative "safe space" is a place where conservatives can express their views. A progressive "safe space" is a place where only progressives can express their views.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 12:41 AM
1

Or use someone else's... Or if everyone else is inexplicably failing to provide the service take note: a market opportunity exists for you to exploit. If you can provide the service better than they can, then you'll get their money and their customers instead.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 12:28 AM
1

Believe it or not, they'd much rather keep your money. They can't however, throw you in jail if you decide to not do business with them anymore. You still have the ability to cease paying them if they don't hold up their end of the bargain. "Not delivering on promises" is not a problem unique to privately provided insurance either.
/r/MensRights19/04/18 12:17 AM
1

But I'd prefer to be coerced by a transparent public entity than by an opaque private one. We're assuming that this is purely capitalist, so private entities would not have the ability to force you to pay, merely to deny services if you don't pay. Plus, I find faith-based private entities to be viscerally repellent. Then don't use them. Edit: and to head off what I'm pretty sure your next argument will be: No. If nature is the only thing "forcing" you to do something without any other conscious …
/r/MensRights19/04/18 12:03 AM
3

I'd argue that all of the non-coercive methods like the ones I mentioned should be tried first. The downside of the ones that must be funded by coercive redistribution (in general, welfare) is that they must always hurt someone first in order to benefit someone else; robbing selected Peter to pay for collective Paul.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 10:55 PM
4

Huh, no such thing as capitalist 'safety nets', insurance, voluntary charity, and mutual aid/fraternal societies all meet the definition of a safety net within a purely capitalist society. No, they won't save everyone, but they don't save everyone in any other arrangement either.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 09:35 PM
113

"Cultural Marxism is a figment of your imagination" they said, little red books in hand.
/r/MensRights18/04/18 09:32 PM
1

The reason people support laws like these is because they believe (usually correctly) that they, personally, won't have to abide by them. In the rare instances when abusive laws are applied equally however, authoritarians are always shocked whenever they find that they too must follow the laws they advocated for. I can guarantee, that they overwhelming majority of people who support mandatory gender inclusiveness have no intention whatsoever to make sure that the law is applied to women's spaces…
/r/MensRights18/04/18 06:31 PM
2

Behind every successful man appears a woman.
/r/MGTOW17/04/18 03:55 PM
7

and cheaper most likely.
/r/MensRights17/04/18 03:17 PM
11

The system only works if you use the system. Stated in another way. If you want the utilize the enormous amounts of effort and resources the system has to help you, you should have to put in a bare minimum amount of effort yourself. If you can't be bothered to help yourself, why should that obligation fall entirely to others?
/r/MensRights17/04/18 03:12 PM
2

The punishment should be much more severe if the deception is discovered by others instead of being admitted by the false accuser.
/r/MensRights16/04/18 09:24 PM
1

I'm going to go ahead and say that number didn't actually come from anywhere.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 02:35 AM
4

Women interact with men daily, and many of them are married to men, how is it that they remain ignorant? When a man is aware that, at any moment, his entire livelihood can be legally taken away from him at a whim by an upset spouse or coworker with little to no recourse, they tend to avoid bringing up difficult topics.
/r/MensRights13/04/18 12:51 AM
2

Here you go. In summary the Overton Window is the range of ideas accepted by society and the shifting of the window is the noting of how the suggestion of unthinkable ideas or the demonization of popular ideas can shift the range of what society considers an acceptable range of thought.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 03:53 PM
2

Hollywood is going to toss him feet first into a wood chipper for this. If he's lucky it'll only be done figuratively.
/r/MensRights12/04/18 03:49 PM
2

couldn't decide on a font eh?
/r/MGTOW11/04/18 07:03 PM
2

Fully half of the accusers' stories were false from the very beginning to anyone who looked at them with even the tiniest hint of skepticism. Didn't stop the media from using their names to add to the "total number" of accusers though.
/r/MGTOW11/04/18 03:27 PM
3

When faced with a choice between a hot young airhead bimbo and an old saggy airhead bimbo, men choose the former. Baffling! That dumb 21 year old doesn't magically get smarter or develop a better personality as she gets older, but her opinion of herself will develop quite a bit.
/r/MGTOW10/04/18 03:25 PM
3

Want to get more boys interested in reading? Have something other than literary Valium available on required reading lists. Less Austen more Heinlein.
/r/MensRights09/04/18 11:52 PM
16

I just don't understand why these shooters don't go for higher value targets. They tend to have armed guards.
/r/MGTOW04/04/18 10:00 PM
75

Missing the elephant in the room: If a woman wants to fuck up a large number of people's lives there are countless ways for her to do it entirely legally. Why brutalize those around you with your own two hands when the system can be relied upon to do it on your behalf with no risk to yourself?
/r/MGTOW04/04/18 09:39 PM
2

"Try telling this to a slave that just escaped the plantation."
/r/MGTOW04/04/18 04:36 PM
1

Because we know that being named as a rapist is, in itself, a punishment, and society in general seems to be ok with inflicting that particular punishment on people with no oversight or restraint whatsoever. Plus, while publicly naming the accused can attract others who want to accuse that person of misconduct as well, making it illegal to release the name of the alleged victim makes it next to impossible for people who may have also been accused by the alleged victim to come forward with their …
/r/MensRights31/03/18 07:58 PM
4

bruises are infectious if a person who has a bruise touches another person hard enough.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 07:05 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter