HorrendousHexapod Archive

Upvotes	Title	Category	Author	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
10	So uh… What do women want again?		HorrendousHexapod	/r/ExRedPill	07/02/22 12:04 PM
9	How valid are studies about facial attractiveness?		HorrendousHexapod	/r/ExRedPill	10/02/22 12:57 PM

Upvotes	Comment on	Subreddit	Date (UTC)
1	How valid are studies about facial attractiveness? All good	/r/ExRedPill	10/02/22 01:50 PM
2	How valid are studies about facial attractiveness? I also think that it’s kind of telling that even studies of some animal species suggest that their sexual preferences are influenced by their environments (i.e. mating with animals similar to their parents or copying the habits of other females). I think the main thing that stood out to me though was how some of the sources claimed they had confirmed objective attractiveness across the board, but then again that could be an overestimation on their part.	/r/ExRedPill	10/02/22 01:41 PM
1	How valid are studies about facial attractiveness? How important would you say the impact of individual preferences on facial attractiveness are when compared to shared preferences?	/r/ExRedPill	10/02/22 01:33 PM
2	How valid are studies about facial attractiveness? I don’t remember all of them, but here are some of the ones arguing for agreed facial attractiveness: https://journals.lww.com/plasreconsurg/Abstract/2006/09010/An_Objective_System_for_Measuring_Facial.27.aspx https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0099629 https://www.nature.com/articles/srep35905 Here’s the main ones arguing for individual preferences: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344202089_Beauty_is_in_the_Eye_of_the_Cultural_Beholder https://www.research…	/r/ExRedPill	10/02/22 01:31 PM
1	Mark Manson and hypergamy Thank you for the response. Just to clarify, I’m not in any way a redpiller, I’ve just been reading a lot of psychology studies which contradict each other about mating preference and just wanted to get your perspective on the matter.	/r/ExRedPill	08/02/22 12:14 AM
1	Mark Manson and hypergamy If you don’t mind me asking, what are your thoughts on the following studies I’ve found kind of relating to ‘Hypergamy’? https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255683170_Mate_Preference_Necessities_in_Long_and_Short-Term_Mating_People_Prioritize_in_Themselves_What_Their_Mates_Prioritize_in_Them https://www.researchgate.net/publication/11321318_The_Necessities_and_Luxuries_of_Mate_Preferences_Testing_the_Tradeoffs https://www.academia.edu/14833226/Evolution_Traits_and_the_Stages_of_Human_Courts…	/r/ExRedPill	07/02/22 01:42 PM
1	Is there any scientific and/or evidential basis for the theory of Hypergamy? What are your thoughts on this study regarding preferred traits of a partner which seems to suggest women prefer men with income in the highest 70th percentile?	/r/ExRedPill	07/02/22 01:31 PM
1	It's a scientific fact that hypergamy does not exist What are your thoughts on this study I found about status Hypergamy in marriages in Sweden. It seems to suggest that in hypogamous unions, women tend to have a higher social class background and occupational prestige, but lower income than their partners.	/r/ExRedPill	01/01/22 03:54 PM
1	I still don't see how redpill or especially blackpill is wrong. Hey, I stumbled upon this studyabout the importance of physical attractiveness among women and their mothers. Apparently, personality is only important if the man is attractive, but something about the study just feels… off.	/r/ExRedPill	23/12/21 01:32 PM
1	80/20 and SMV Debunked (Studies and Data) Also, one more question, what are your thoughts on the graph shown in figure 2, which seemingly mirrors the OKCupid data?	/r/ExRedPill	11/12/21 04:26 PM
1	80/20 and SMV Debunked (Studies and Data) Thanks for the reply. I also found that at least some surveys concluded that the likelihood of men and women being in a committed relationship from online dating was basically equal, with men being 1% more likely to do so. I’m not sure that this one survey 100% represents relationships formed from online dating as a whole, but there do appear to be a few studies that go against the red pill’s ideas of it.	/r/ExRedPill	10/12/21 04:02 PM
1	80/20 and SMV Debunked (Studies and Data) Hey, what are your thoughts on this study I found? It was basically a study conducted in a Southwest city with six months worth of online dating data which apparently found that men were four more times likely to message women. I’m not sure about the accuracy of this report, as I know there’s a lot of conflicting data about online dating out there. Just wanted to know your thoughts.	/r/ExRedPill	10/12/21 11:57 AM
3	In your opinion, who's the worst Red Piller and why ? They also seem to make a lot of appeals to nature as well when talking about “human nature”	/r/ExRedPill	29/05/21 07:13 AM
2	In your opinion, who's the worst Red Piller and why ? Oh yeah definitely.	/r/ExRedPill	29/05/21 06:14 AM
4	In your opinion, who's the worst Red Piller and why ? Oh yeah, it’s so convenient that the red pill just ignores this stuff. They only care about science when a study says what they want it to say.	/r/ExRedPill	29/05/21 06:11 AM
1	In your opinion, who's the worst Red Piller and why ? But don’t you see, back in prehistory men were the ones doing all the hunting so women had it easy. It’s not like bears, lions, wolves, hyenas and sabretooth cats roamed the world at the time, and it’s not like bison, ground sloths, rhinos, mammoths and deer had the ability to brutally maim any human they came across. And it’s not like these creatures would ever wander into human camps when the men were out hunting. (Seriously, why do they even say shit like this?)	/r/ExRedPill	29/05/21 06:04 AM