TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HoundDogs Archive

View 8 posts and 1,001 comments by HoundDogs on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,001 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
23

It’s become obvious to me that men and boy issues are the root of this and school shootings are the most visible part of a much larger problem. Feminists, leftists, and their male lap dogs want to blame white men and boys as the cause itself. Shame them, Ostracize them, call them names and make them feel horrible. Yet, as usual, they lack the intellect and foresight to see that this will increase the problem. Or, maybe they know precisely what they’re doing. Being angry at white men and boys is …
/r/MensRights19/05/18 03:02 AM
5

Then this issue isn’t about consent at all, then. It’s about power. It’s more politics. You want the power to jail a man whenever you see fit. Anyone who believes this garbage unironically should be publicly ridiculed and exposed at every opportunity.
/r/MensRights12/05/18 01:13 PM
8

A common theme I see absolutely everywhere in the problems of our world is a fundamental lack of people willing to take personal responsibility for their decisions the way you did. Seriously, that one thing is one of the biggest problems we have. If that one concept could be instilled in children from day 1, I swear to God we'd have about 90% less problems than we have today.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/18 03:14 PM
3

Much of the disharmony we are seeing in our society is because a child is being raised by, primarily, only one parent. In many cases they are taught to dislike the other parent if that other parent is even in the picture. Never forget that if you want children. If your marriage fails, you may very well doom your children to be without a strong male influence in their life. In doing so, YOUR ill thought out decision or lack of ability to maintain your marriage perpetuates a problem culture 20, 30…
/r/TheRedPill04/05/18 01:09 PM
1

The dopamine (I believe) released by porn watching becomes an addiction like any other even though it’s not a chemical addiction. If you eat a lot of carbs you’ll notice a similar thing when you try to stop. IMO it’s not as bad for the body as a drug addiction as there are other chemicals the body is physiologically addicted to, HOWEVER it can be just as destructive because it’s actions are far more insidious. It’s ability to skew your life is not as readily apparent as a narcotic. So it is “acc…
/r/TheRedPill02/05/18 11:20 AM
27

The slow introduction of no-fault divorce was one of the most insidious, misunderstood, and, sadly, unnoticed tragedies of the modern age. A thousand school shooters could not ruin as many families as the cancer of no-fault. One full cycle of a full blown financial depression probably isn’t even as potent as the long term financial damage either. Yet, the racket continues.
/r/TheRedPill26/04/18 11:35 PM
6

I forget what dating site advertisement it is (maybe match.com) but there an attractive girl on there talking about wanting to “meet a nice guy” among other AWALT staples. I just fucking cringe when I see that because I know what’s actually being said.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/18 05:54 PM
1

If you’ve got nothing you’ve got nothing to lose. Learn the law. Tie her up in legal fees for a decade. Go captain catamarans in the British Virgin islands.
/r/MensRights24/04/18 12:27 AM
4

With California's prison population problem, I doubt she'll even do 25.
/r/MensRights22/04/18 04:58 AM
1

I know what you mean. I’m a father now so my concern is how to connect with my son in a similar way that my father was able to connect to me and teach him the way without pushing too hard and making him rebel. Like yours, my life has been a journey through all sorts of paradigms and I’ve come to realize just how much satisfaction can come from life when you apply the RP to your entire life. Not to demean anyone else here who are all, undoubtedly, at different phases of their lives, but “spinning…
/r/TheRedPill10/04/18 03:34 AM
7

I kind of see how they’re using it and I think, if applied strategically, it’s a potentially solid technique. In sales this approach is called “Dummy up”. You know more than them but you act confused (yet interested and engaged) and get them to show you. Since you actually know more, though, you can ask the right questions, get all kinds of information, and get to the root of the sale. It works because (speculating here) you are still in control of the conversation with your questions as opposed…
/r/TheRedPill10/04/18 03:28 AM
1

The condition is called, I think, phimosis. It’s a broad term for different kinds of derangement in the ability of the forskin to retract. I’m not sure if that’s what this baby had but this is one example of a condition that can cause urinary problems that makes circumcision necessary.
/r/MensRights02/04/18 11:55 AM
1

I did not, but that's good to know.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 09:15 PM
1

If he really wasn't the father, they should send the bill of the entire process to the woman who demanded one of the most talented artists of our time be exhumed for her selfishness.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 08:45 PM
1

I’m of the opinion that proven false accusers should be punished extremely harshly. A civilized society can not afford the kind of justice system that excuses destroying a mans entire life with no repercussions at all.
/r/MensRights30/03/18 11:56 PM
1

The hardest thing of all has to be being the father. Having to give your own child up to that monster, knowing she is in danger and will likely experience pain and terror. As a father, you witness the “justice” system malfunction and you’re completely powerless to stop it. What do you do? Take the child and run away? Kill the ex? Then what? It’s just awful.
/r/MensRights24/03/18 08:45 PM
1

The more I read, all I want to do is help improve this. Every instinct I have tells me that we are barreling down a path that is so destructive to the future of human physical and emotional health. Witnessing these changes and others just leaves me confounded. There are so many questions rattling around in my head that each day I find myself to be less certain than the last. Those constrains are no more. I hear 16/17 year old girls in my classes bragging about their conquests and even comparing …
/r/TheRedPill21/03/18 05:53 PM
1

Reddit is choc-a-block full of insufferable leftist faggots. To come to a non red pilled subreddit and ask for advice is the first mistake.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/18 12:21 AM
1

The concept of a “Demographic Winter” is an interesting one to read about with respect to population decline.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/18 02:24 PM
8

Sometimes, these funny no-bullshit voices from above catch me at the right moment and I can’t help but laugh my ass off.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/18 02:21 PM
3

I was. I married the girl who friendzoned that poor bastard almost 15 years ago :)
/r/TheRedPill06/02/18 06:05 PM
1

At the end of the day, I truly believe we are all good people. Our instinct was to do the "right thing". Treat women the way that the culture (and your single mother) tells you to treat them. Look for a long term relationship. Be caring. Be their friend. Be romantic. Be a puppy. Respect their feelings. Well before places like this existed I was in the same boat as you. Looking back, I can say that it was fucking pathetic but I can't say that I "regret" being that way considering that it was the …
/r/TheRedPill06/02/18 03:26 PM
7

It's not that it doesn't exist. It does. It's just that the reason for it was becuase feminists weren't doing the calculations correctly before running to the world with their data. So we got accusations of "sexism" instead of legitimate conversations about how men and women work differently in different environments and for a number of different reasons that are highly variable.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 06:52 PM
1

I keep wondering why we haven't seen an uptick in revenge crimes among men. If someone accused me of sexual assault, knowing it was consensual, and destroyed my life it would take a lot for me not to make that right by any means necessary.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/18 03:26 AM
16

Billionaire dudes who can and have had anything they want and have no real responsibility can get tired of the status quo. Strange fetishes are probably extremely common in these groups but they can afford to keep it quiet.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/17 12:09 AM
6

Is joke
/r/MensRights03/12/17 03:51 AM
4

Don’t be a misogynist Edit: the above is sarcasm. 💪🏻
/r/MensRights03/12/17 01:27 AM
6

Dunno, but if she gets to keep her job when the guy who told a single joke a few years ago looses his, there’s something truly wrong with the world.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 06:28 PM
1

The black nuclear family was decimated by the welfare state. The most helpful thing the culture can do is to get rid of welfare.
/r/MensRights25/11/17 04:08 PM
1

Thanks, Satan.
/r/MensRights28/10/17 02:23 AM
4

The irony is that robot men will not be the dominant issue, it’s robotic women that may truly reshape the world. Through feminism, divorce law, wealth inequality, and the mere biological instincts of women, men will become (if they haven’t already) more and more turned off by the prospect of pair bonding. There’s simply too much risk involved and not enough reward. Plus women are all competing for men with resources that allow for children....something more and more men can’t provide. Add to tha…
/r/MensRights27/10/17 04:55 PM
0

I love this shit. It's like I waited my whole life to finally find articles worth reading and, of all the stuff out there, this is the material I find most interesting.
/r/TheRedPill24/10/17 07:10 PM
3

I don't often comment here but I wanted to say as someone who's been successfully married for over a decade, there is a tremendous amount of truth here that I didn't even recognize I had developed naturally as a result of repeated failures with women as a young man. For anyone on the fence about the use of the word "Narcissism", when it comes to actually describing a desirable trait when dealing with the opposite sex, I can tell you that it is absolutely essential. Obsessive, clinical narcissism…
/r/TheRedPill02/09/17 02:30 AM
13

We're getting there. Trouble is you need to analyze people personally as it's too easy to infiltrate when recruiting online.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 01:14 PM
5

This is why I stopped using it. I didn't realize just how convenient Crome was until I tried to switch.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/17 01:13 PM
4

There's an enormous amount of controversy about that figure also. The actual number is somewhere between 3 and 40%. No one has any idea how many rape accusations are truly false. We also, apparently, can't even agree on the definition of rape so who's definition are we using?
/r/MensRights06/08/17 12:52 AM
8

I feel like feminism is the root of much of the division and chaos we are seeing today. Eventually, I feel like feminists will not need to invent new bullshit myths. The need to invent new myths becomes irrelevant when you start telling naive people that logic is sexist and insinuating that the only truth in the world is feminist dogma. Similar to the way the Church of Scientology works. L. Ron Hubbard has been dead for decades but his word is gospel and anyone who questions it is pre-emptively …
/r/TheRedPill24/07/17 02:32 PM
93

He is. That's what made the movie so great. It was historically accurate in every way he could possibly make it. We don't need diversity shoehorned into history. Women were in the movie (as nurses and cooks) on the ships, because women were actually on the ships as nurses and cooks. Crazy, I know.
/r/MensRights24/07/17 02:17 PM
24

Sounds precisely how their thought process would analyze a problem, determine a solution, and execute. Meanwhile the suicide rate goes through the roof and more men find companionship in rubber women. Feminist will still never take responsibility. Rinse and repeat.
/r/MensRights22/07/17 07:08 PM
6

It's hard not to want to do horrible things to people who do this shit. They're not human anymore. They lost that privilege.
/r/MensRights07/07/17 12:55 AM
–

Make another one with a top 10 list of reminding women not to do things like -don't falsely accuse men of rape because their boyfriend back home would know they cheated. -Dont falsely accuse men of rape because you need the credit in art class. -Don't tell someone you're on the pill when your not.
/r/MensRights22/06/17 01:28 AM
3

One trait complements the other, I'd imagine.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/17 01:13 PM
27

I'm going to be honest here. I get the hypocrisy argument, I do. If it's not OK for one then it should not be ok for the other. That said (this is my opinion, and I realize this could be a slippery slope) I don't feel like we should be criminalizing this at all. It's silly. Grabbing someone's ass when, clearly, the intent is to fuck around and get attention does not strike me as behavior worthy of a life ruining criminal record.
/r/MensRights04/06/17 10:14 PM
1

Yea, I have a friend with a vicious ex wife and he managed to get a fair deal in his custody arrangement. I do think the tide is turning. However, there is still a considerable amount of anti-male sentiment in the family court system. I don't want men to have an advantage, I want both kids to see both biological parents as much as possible as long as both are fit to care for them.
/r/MensRights25/05/17 01:11 PM
–

She's a good spokesperson. There has to be more people standing up for this issue than just fathers who have had the tragic mishap of going through a divorce and lost custody of their children.
/r/MensRights24/05/17 02:27 PM
4

One of my acquaintances is the head of the English department at a major university. He's a "white cis male". He supports and defends every last absurd notion in the social justice cult. He would welcome such an idea with open arms until his family went bankrupt. 15 years of postgraduate education, writing literature, and teaching....all gone. How on earth an intellectual mind gets poisoned to that degree is absolutely beyond me.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 04:34 PM
3

At this point, it's important for them to not only lose cases and lose their assets afterwards, but it's important that people SEE the consequences of these suits. If you're going to falsely accuse someone, to this magnitude then it's safe to say that whoever this "Jane Doe" is, will never learn any lessons. Others, however, can see what happens and learn.
/r/MensRights19/05/17 04:29 PM
12

Let's just give females the ultimate power to lock up anyone they don't like. That should go well.
/r/MensRights17/05/17 03:47 PM
7

Heres literature my pseudo-intellectual hate cult produced to prove you wrong -feminist
/r/MensRights13/05/17 07:15 PM
12

In all fairness, it is the U.K. So draconian sentences aren't as common as they would be in the US.
/r/MensRights11/05/17 12:05 AM
30

I went out of my way to buy it on iTunes yesterday when I heard that Netflix censored it. There are no two ways about it, the documentary is done extremely well. It covers the staples of Mens Rights issues and perfectly articulates the problem with modern feminism. If you are a type that "downloads" movies behind a proxy, please, for the love of all that is holy, use your money to buy this one. You will not only be happy with the product but you will be supporting a fantastic film that can be us…
/r/MensRights08/05/17 06:02 PM
6

The best thing to do is not to stoop to their level but just recognize that, regardless of gender, people who do this on a crowded train are just inconsiderate. No gender war required.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 08:24 PM
3

The man has clearly reached Nirvana.
/r/MensRights03/04/17 12:38 AM
12

That's not how free speech works.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 05:38 PM
–

In a free country no one has a right not to be offended. Nor do they have a right not to be "Triggered". I simply don't understand why this nonsense is not hitting the high courts.
/r/MensRights21/03/17 03:12 PM
1

I gotta be honest, say what you will about her but when she was doing stand up, Ellen was pretty good. Her sarcasm, delivery, timing and that ability to draw sympathy in a funny way have always been stellar.
/r/TheRedPill17/03/17 11:51 PM
1

If you can keep a log of everything you've done and the process you've gone through to when you attempted to get it straightened out, you can go to your congressman's office (Try federal first and see what they say). Be very calm, very rational, and keep a level head. Come at it from the perspective of someone who simply needs a powerful mediator to get a solution to bureaucratic confusion between two states (as opposed to an angry ex-husband or someone "pissed at the system"). Most likley you w…
/r/MensRights16/03/17 03:12 AM
-2

I'd disagree. It may not be in a way or mechanism that some people here approve of, but there's no denying Milo has steadfastly stood against the more pernicious aspects of modern feminism and he has taken that cause to college campuses all over the country. He's not the kind of person I generally find myself hanging around with either, but I don't think that should take away from the fact that his influence will ultimately be a net positive for the rights of men.
/r/MensRights21/02/17 10:46 PM
8

I'm sure a certain demographic does like it. I'm also sure a certain kind of critic gave it glowing reviews. That doesn't make it valuable. Have you seen it? It appears to be entertainment designed specifically so women whose souls have been sucked out by the false promises of feminism don't have to feel alone in their spiraling depression.
/r/MensRights12/02/17 06:52 AM
–

Dunham is a great example of someone who would be nothing without her connections. At least someone like Paris Hilton is beautiful, she's had found her way to a nice life. Lena Dunham is completely worthless in every sense of the word, even negatively valuable if you include her potentially damaging influence on culture. If she was born without money, she'd be folding clothes at Old Navy and getting fired for doing a shorty job.
/r/MensRights11/02/17 08:29 PM
4

What a great write up. Truly, commendable and fantastic breakdown of events. It's so great to see that men are now becoming aware of this. It's going to save and improve marriages, relationships, families, and lives.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/17 02:40 PM
1

How does one go about producing such a symbol on a mac?
/r/MensRights08/02/17 07:31 PM
6

AHHH, no. Totally sarcasm. I thought it was obvious. Kind of shows the state of things when we're unsure.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 06:26 PM
7

Yes, but do you know where the weight room is?
/r/MensRights08/02/17 06:25 PM
–

I think you mean hate groups full of white men who have no right to talk and need to be exterminated from the face of the earth.
/r/MensRights08/02/17 04:12 PM
2

So, I'm also hearing that the group coming up behind millennials are far less socially liberal and, strangely, tend to lean conservative politically. I wonder if that's not the generation to really focus on. Seems like millennials are a lost cause and they're just inevitably going to end up as a fuck ton of single plant/cat ladies and old men playing VR games.
/r/TheRedPill07/02/17 02:50 PM
13

The right circumstances for a functional and long lasting marriage do seem to have gone down considerably since I have been married (many years ago). You've got this perfect storm of men that are taught not to be themselves but to be what women want them to be. No confidence, no assertiveness, no aggression, no anger, but romantic nice guy. Then you've got a culture of women that seems to be pushing this idea that it's more satisfying to be single, be a "working girl" and play the field for much…
/r/MensRights05/02/17 05:44 PM
2

"Nice guy" routine.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 03:03 AM
14

A feminist with a theory is like a 19th century priest who performs exorcisms. It only works on the truly initiated believers and you get the feeling that if it DID work, the problem was probably bullshit to begin with.
/r/MensRights13/12/16 12:08 AM
–

Is there some sort of correlation between men not talking about their feelings and male suicide? I'm no scientist but I'd be in much more of a hurry to believe that men are killing themselves because they have: -Seen the horrors of war -Been emptied out by the "family" court system -Lost their children in a bitter custody battle -Realized that they were taught a false ideology instead of how to be a man so they're destined to be lonely the rest of their life. Talk therapy is great and all, but I…
/r/MensRights12/12/16 07:31 PM
6

Modern feminism is worse than scientology. The effects of scientology are at least contained in a relatively small bubble. Feminism ruins more lives of men and children than cancer. Feminism fucked up the later half of the 20th century so badly, the damage they've done to the nuclear family is incalculable. The lives of children (and the adults they become) will be negatively affected for generations.
/r/MensRights04/12/16 12:35 AM
2

TA DA!
/r/MensRights18/11/16 10:34 PM
1

Hate for men to have a voice. Fuck this world. Jesus, I was born too late.
/r/MensRights25/10/16 01:18 PM
8

This is it. The underlying purpose of projects like this is to try to make people feel guilty for things that they can't help but like because they grew up with it. Female lead characters have a potential to be developed just as deeply as any male lead. They could make some utterly fantastic films 100% female casts if people focus intensely on the quality of the project instead of the moralizing. Audiences can see through that very easily. Take the "Elizabeth" movies with Cate Blanchett as the l…
/r/MensRights03/10/16 03:22 PM
1

Perhaps people would want to see it if it were an organic effort for the sake of making a great movie. What they're doing, and I'm surprised they would even consider it after the whole Ghostbusters fiasco, is not that. They're forcing this "all women" thing down people's throats in such a way that it makes them uncomfortable. The thought process goes like this: Ghostbusters did not have a female member.... as a female who wants equality this is offensive and sexist. Let's make an ALL female cast…
/r/MensRights03/10/16 03:16 PM
7

School For Kids Who Don't Read Good offers a safe space for Illuminati members to consider their thetan level.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 03:08 PM
7

No one, woman or man, should be trusted on their word alone when going through a divorce settlement...under any circumstances but ESPECIALLY when there's this much money at stake. When you're talking about taking someones children away from them you better have some solid evidence to back up your claims.
/r/MensRights26/09/16 09:00 PM
-4

Wait, wasn't Jimmy Savile outed after his death as a pedophile?
/r/MensRights18/09/16 08:39 PM
3

It's crazy. I totally believe in freedom of speech, but it's almost like there should be some form of punishment for this shit.
/r/TheRedPill16/09/16 01:41 PM
23

I came here to make an off the cuff comment about her teeth and this person is just funnier than anything I could have come up with. Seriously, though, what the fuck are we coming to in this country? Is this really what's going to be occupying the left for the next 20 years?....matters of completely delusional "privilege"? I mean, from an objective, rational point of view it would seem that there are better and more productive mechanisms to improve any inequality we have left but that's exactly …
/r/MensRights16/09/16 01:57 AM
4

People like her will condemn Brock Turner in the same breath that they pat themselves on the back for raping a dude under almost identical circumstances. The point is not that either is innocent, the point is that they are both guilty and we need to stop listening to rapist hypocrites.
/r/MensRights07/09/16 09:01 PM
25

Feminism is cancer. It eventually destroys everything it touches.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 06:11 PM
–

I think I discovered the real question here, hidden underneath all of this fluff: Why is this camera a misogynist?
/r/MensRights30/08/16 12:19 AM
1

I don't fully accept the premise that homosexuality is a major vehicle in pushing this agenda, which I think might be confusing you about what I've said. The wealthy benefit from power. Power keeps them safe and it keeps them wealthy. There are a number of social trends that tend to lead to them getting more power and some that tend to give the non-wealthy more power. As to your question, I don't want to put words into someone elses argument but I'd guess that they would say that The wealthy ben…
/r/TheRedPill28/08/16 06:02 PM
-1

Honestly, I've been alive a while now and I have every reason to believe that #2 is more likely. How that occurs and how much is natural vs how much is controlled is debatable, of course, but one thing I've learned is never to underestimate a power hungry ideologue with money. I think it's perfectly reasonable that their actions depend on complacency, disbelief, and people not wanting to ask questions for fear of being called "Conspiracy theorists." I think it's quite easy to underestimate how m…
/r/TheRedPill28/08/16 05:27 PM
-1

I mean, I get that this is a possible explanation, but why should we pursue policies that end the nuclear family when the research is so soundly against such an idea? Liberal or not.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/16 03:31 PM
5

The big thing I can't wrap my head around is "WHY?" What's the advantage of destroying the nuclear family? There is clear research showing that children need BOTH parents in their life or they are far more likley to suffer with psychological issues later in life. So, why do they persist? Are they just miserable fucks? What's the endgame?
/r/TheRedPill28/08/16 02:01 PM
26

It should serve as sort of a litmus test for what's to come in future elections. Anyone who believes that "guilty until proven innocent" shit is a totalitarian in disguise. The fact that the people who don't understand this concept are growing shows how horribly we've done educating the youth in matters of logic. These people are going to vote in every election and, eventually, there may not be much those with thinking Minds can do to stop them. The foundations of the most advanced model of Just…
/r/MensRights24/08/16 11:39 PM
1

That's Reddit for you.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 03:49 PM
6

Pretty honourable, actually. Acting prematurely on unproven allegations is, after all, why many of us are so passionate about these ideas. It's commendable that you would defend someone that you disagree with before being certain.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 03:23 AM
1

Silly.....men can't be victims of any of that.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 03:21 AM
1

Start a club for men who sexually identify as women. Problem solved. Also, fuck Harvard. What kind of a tub of shit institution comes up with this kind of feminist drivel?
/r/MensRights17/08/16 03:18 AM
3

This is what happens when you allow an entire field of pseudo-scientific study come up with their own definitions of words. By changing the language the way that they have, it allows them to feed this delusion and speak confidently about their discoveries. This, in turn, attracts more people into the fold. It's a cult. Far more dangerous than Scientology because it preys on taking advantage of people's language in very subtle ways.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 09:56 PM
16

The women aren't stupid for getting married. It's a good investment.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 12:05 PM
54

From ANY perspective too....men included.
/r/TheRedPill21/07/16 03:31 AM
9

Academia is likely the root. Generation after generation of liberal professors that haven't had to do a days worth of hard work in their life convinving young people of obscure theories that sound nice on paper but make absolutely no sense in objective reality.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 04:27 PM
–

It's because he wasn't banned for this. He was banned for being a conservative that spoils the liberal narrative and promotes Trump. Any accusation of harassment is laughable, which is precisely why so many people have a problem with "harassment" policies on Reddit and Twitter. It allows the owners to determine the definition of harassment with no oversight.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 12:12 PM
1

This girl is a despicable human being. She ruined that poor guys life because it furthered her art career. I hope his lawsuit against Columbia pays millions. They enabled her to do this with absolutely no evidence whatsoever.
/r/MensRights04/07/16 06:16 PM
2

There are no such things as "normal" millionaires. They can afford to be a lot, but they can't afford to be normal.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/16 08:16 PM
1

I hope he gets tens of millions of dollars out of Columbia for enabling this psychopath. This never would have gone anywhere if the university had just handled the problem rationally.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 02:42 PM
5

Cameras are a great way to correct the record. In this case, it would have been nice to see the altercation before the video started because one of them is, without question, lying (my money is on the girl but I have no evidence of that).
/r/MensRights28/06/16 02:39 PM
15

So....a millionaire who raped a drunk guy and an unfunny liberal millionaire are sitting in a public bar drinking aluminum bottle Bud Light piss water while trying to pass off statistics so ill conceived, that they can be debunked in a single sentence. There's nothing about this video that even enters into the realm of reality.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 02:34 PM
3

I keep wondering how much longer this can go on. It's obviously affecting more and more people. How long until men who would not otherwise have been concerned with these issues begin to form more powerful groups against this shit? Seems inevitable.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 02:27 PM
21

Despicable. She destroyed a man's life and his career because she needed an art project and acceptance into the SJW fold. I truly hope he wins his lawsuit against Columbia and I hope they have to pay millions for enabling this sick human being. If this had been handled properly, that's what she would have stayed....a mentally unstable half wit with no future. Now, because Columbia fucked up, she's some kind of goddamn "hero". Just sickening.
/r/MensRights28/06/16 02:22 PM
9

Show me any guy who's got a six pack and 10% body fat, and SMV higher than his wife who blew up his marriage by being alpha... I doubt you'll find one. Drove that one home rather nicely.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/16 02:57 AM
4

How about taking the child away from the mother and allowing the father the choice to ether raise him or give him up for adoption. When you rape someone, you shouldn't have normal rights.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 12:17 PM
3

It's no surprised that there we people this screwed up and entitled. What's really the problem is having a state that reinforces this insanity.
/r/MensRights12/06/16 12:41 PM
2

Radical Feminists have spent decades toxifying the culture of first world nations so badly that they have effectively ripped the nuclear family apart. And they wonder why men recede into video games and don't want to get married.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 02:25 AM
30

Reminds me of that old Onion news story where the American weather men are acting all relieved that a category 5 hurricane didn't hit Texas but instead completely devastated that big land mass south of Texas. Found it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nFM1X0o2pnc
/r/MensRights02/06/16 02:17 AM
3

It's an interesting thought experiment. It's a strange state of existance where you're this good person and you want to do the right thing with your life and you want to have real friendships and real relationships based on trust but you literally have no idea who you can trust anymore. Money is that powerful. So you're forced to live in this bubble. Then when you take a chance on someone something like this happens. I can't say I envy them.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 03:39 PM
7

A bruise should not be evidence in cases where this much money is at stake...full stop. When divorces happen, there are too many factors at play. Hell hath no fury like a war bride out to get what she believes is hers and she can manipulatively wield the court system like a weapon. Witness and video evidence should be the only thing admissible. When these many millions of dollars are changing hands, there's nothing people won't stoop to. I'd let a friend kick me down a flight of stairs if it mea…
/r/MensRights31/05/16 03:04 PM
13

At the end of the day we're all just human. Johnny Depp is a complicated dude and probably struggles with emotional issues like anyone else. He's just human and susceptible to the same thing us schlubs are except in his world the women can be vicious pit vipers out for blood. Someone emotionally complicated like Depp coupled with the fact that Depp was dealing with the death of a family member is a ripe target for a BIG payday. Most normal people don't understand how complicated life can be when…
/r/MensRights31/05/16 02:59 PM
34

What pisses me off is not that she tried it but that it's so likely to work that she even thought to do it. Horrible human being, worse culture.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 09:46 PM
–

This girl is a viper. Many of their close friends are coming forward to confirm that she manipulated him frequently and they were afraid that she would pull this very stunt. There is no evidence that he gave her those bruises. Bruises aren't enough to prove something like this to me anymore. Not when there are tens of millions of dollars at stake. I'd gladly throw myself down a flight of stairs for just one million, let alone twenty.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 09:44 PM
3

There's no way he can prove it unless he has security cameras disputing it.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 09:39 PM
9

Always interesting to see how these things play out. Ive had enough of seeing highly accomplished celebrities being fleeced by manipulative, lying women who have absolutely no moral compass at all. This is wrong. We can't continue to let these women get away with this shit. The longer we as a culture say "this is acceptable" by not speaking up, the worse our culture looks. Depp is a great man, perhaps very eccentric but highly talented. I stand behind him.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 09:38 PM
2

I hope to see a massive men's rights effort swell behind Johnny Depp. This shit has got to stop. I'm so fucking tired it seeing theses lying parasites getting away with this shit.
/r/MensRights30/05/16 09:31 PM
1

She's probably completely worthless and the poor guy won't see a dime of that money. Meanwhile what she did should have landed her in prison.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 06:21 PM
8

Divorce rape. Men need to wise up. Marriage is how women legally rob rich men.
/r/MensRights26/05/16 06:19 PM
3

The level of cognitive dissonance it takes to write that is off the fucking charts.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 01:39 PM
2

There has always been this weird aggressive lesbian vibe I pick up on the further into the rabbit hole of feminism I look into. It's very obvious how feminists start to buy into this shit when you realize they're getting their "research" from women who don't need men to exist. Seems kind of counter intuitive to ask someone who has no desire for the opposite sex how a species, whose vast majority is heterosexual, what they think about heterosexual relationships and the culture that surrounds it. …
/r/MensRights11/05/16 02:27 AM
2

I like how they've created a cultural environment where they can say absolutely anything degrading and derogatory they want to about white men while consistantly using the words "racist", "sexist", and "misogynist" as a dog whistle to censor any opinion that disagrees with theirs. All based on the completely flawed and easily debunkable concept of privilege. These people are cancer. How did we let the cancer grow this much?
/r/MensRights11/05/16 02:20 AM
3

Online censorship really is getting bad these days. It's happening on all major platforms now.
/r/MensRights12/04/16 01:43 PM
17

Why not build a case and go to the police first?
/r/MensRights10/04/16 08:21 PM
3

Jesus, this is disgusting. There's no excuse for this. He's literally changing the fucking world and the state is going to give half his wealth to a woman who's accomplished absolutely nothing notable.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/16 09:36 PM
15

While he was mansplaining.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 03:11 AM
–

Goddamn that patriarchy.
/r/MensRights07/03/16 03:06 AM
2

The threads on the main subs about this were fucking cancer. Everyone just assuming he was guilty and I didn't see any evidence against him. He's wealthy, he's a man, he has LOTS to lose, he has children, and he's going through a divorce/custody battle. Never is there a more perfect time to examine the evidence more closely. I don't like Bill O'Reilly. However, I still want him to get a fair shake.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 06:28 PM
2

It's going to take a lot to get this monster under control at this point. You can't fucking suspend the concept of "Innocent until proven guilty" and not expect some repercussions eventually.
/r/MensRights01/03/16 06:23 PM
1

Somehow, I'm sure this is men's fault.
/r/MensRights29/02/16 04:20 AM
5

....because she earned it, you see.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 11:04 PM
9

That's Tucker Carlson. He's the one so full of shit that Jon Stewart made a single appearance on his show "Crossfire"and killed the program. I actually saw Carlson speak at an event in DC once. He was a prick. I honestly don't know how anyone watches him.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 11:02 PM
8

Article highlights a lot of great things but the some of the perspectives of the writer are cringworthy. Sarkeesian contends (not incorrectly) that women who speak up about sexism are subjected to misogynistic harassment on forums and social media sites. You know, I'm pretty sure that if any person of any gender comes out and spouted the unprovable nonsense that Anita Sarkeesian has, while claiming they were a member of a group (gamers) which they very clearly were not, they would be the on the …
/r/MensRights24/02/16 10:56 PM
13

Strange. I'm told that Twitter is restructuring to protect users from harassment. They even hired Anita Sarkeesian.
/r/MensRights24/02/16 02:20 AM
–

I think you guys are missing a key point here. If a girl doesn't think she was raped and continues to believe that for years, she can change her mind any time in the following years and decide she was raped. We really have no choice but to throw the man in prison at that point. I mean, she cried in court. They made a girl cry. That's pretty clear..
/r/MensRights24/02/16 02:19 AM
4

Seconded
/r/MensRights22/02/16 10:56 PM
3

K...this is one of those times I'm not real happy with the verbiage. I'm constantly saying that the feminist narrative, including things like "Patriarchy", "Privilege", and "Rape Culture" are an abysmal way to approach issues concerning gender and race. Similar to a conspiracy theorist running around screaming "Illuminati!" at everything they think is evil. Sure, they can explain to people what they think "The Illuminati" is, but how does that label help fix the problems? The thing is that slapp…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 04:02 AM
2

Very true, lol. Well......"How would a gay male couple advise a straight son on women?", then, I guess would be a more appropriate question.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 03:55 AM
4

I mean this with as much sincerity as text can convey, I truly hope you got to know your father. Even if he had faults, you still deserve to know him.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 03:53 AM
3

What's always interesting to me is how many people who are in these minority groups don't know that they're supposed to feel "oppressed" and they just go right along accomplishing anything they set their mind too. On the other hand, it's pretty amazing how toxic the belief that "I am oppressed" can be on someone's life. Where I used to work my summers in college (Museum/Art Guard), we had guards of all races. Many were African American, and many were straight up African (Black Ethiopian). The Af…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 03:51 AM
3

The two perspectives are important to have for any child. The gay couple is an interesting idea that I hadn't considered, although I'd never go so far as to say they shouldn't be able to raise children. I'd really be interested to know how a lesbian couple, for example, would guide a young man through the dating world. Having a strong male role model in a situation like that is not a bad thing.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 03:39 AM
10

Single mothers, in my experience, don't give the best advice to their male children. Your anecdote is a perfect example, but a single mother advising a male child on dating....holy shit....that's another one. Talk about having to take "The Red Pill." My lord, if women were any more different than what many mothers teach their boys they are, the'd be aliens.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 03:36 AM
3

No. That's called a strawman argument. The research is pretty clear, children do better with both parents.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 03:32 AM
4

I mean, I see what you're getting at. They can still breath and eat and live their life. What is clear, though, is that children raised by one parent have a lot more problems (both social and potentially psychological later in life) than people raised by both parents.
/r/MensRights22/02/16 03:31 AM
23

All racial and gender hiring quotas are corrosive. The answer to racism and sexism is not "divide everyone into up into races and sees, decide who is most oppressed, and give them everything they haven't worked for." Thats racism and sexism. When you don't hire on merit, the long term outcome is that it affects all of the workers and the companies negatively. It's only the short term outcome, i.e. the unqualified person gets a job, that matters to politicians.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 06:40 PM
–

Versions of this have been posted before so likley fake. Doesn't mean it doesn't happen. Mothers turn children against their fathers all the time. There's a special place in hell for them. Children need fathers. One can only hope the consolation prize is that when the child is old enough they learn the truth and completely disown their dishonest mother. Still, it's a shame to ruin a child's life by ripping their father out of it during their formative years.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 06:36 PM
5

You know it's bad when the girls got a beta wrapped so tight that he's hamstering.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/16 06:25 PM
8

Not knowing why bad things keep happening must be a hard way to live their life. "Why do they always cheat on me." is a hard way to live. For those who never see the light, I can almost guarantee it's a worse existance than knowing the truth and, at least, trying to better themselves.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/16 06:23 PM
38

Just waiting for some alpha to come along and "understand her".
/r/TheRedPill21/02/16 06:21 PM
16

It's pretty crazy to me that universities are now more expensive to students than they have ever been, but the quality and purpose of a University education has been sacrificed at this altar of silliness. Universities who actually care about providing quality educations need to live up to their reputation and take a vocal stand against this nonsense. There's got to be a line drawn in the sand. If you go to one of these emotionally retarded nanny schools, you really need to examine and reconsider…
/r/MensRights21/02/16 03:06 PM
12

I hope you forgot the /s
/r/MensRights21/02/16 03:36 AM
17

...but she's crying in the courtroom.
/r/MensRights21/02/16 02:16 AM
16

Even thought the case can be made that he should have gotten more, this is actually a good thing. Schools have absolutely ridiculous policies concerning sexual assault, but now they're getting sued left and right and they're losing or settling big sums. So regardless of how justified and PC they think their rules are, they still can't outwit the tort system and that may just force them to get rid of these shitty policies.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 01:58 AM
11

That's despicable.
/r/MensRights19/02/16 01:54 AM
1

My wife is the same way. She didn't like him. She loves Louie CK, though. He seems to keep his stuff a bit more balanced but still manages to put together some amazing material.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/16 08:42 PM
4

I know he's been good and I've followed him for years, but the last couple of years he's been growing tremendously both in the public eye and in his comedic delivery/material. Here's an example of what I mean. (https://www.google.com/trends/explore#q=bill%20burr)
/r/TheRedPill17/02/16 05:13 PM
34

As an aside, I love hoe Burr consistently double's down on controversial stuff and gets very serious as opposed to backing off of the pressure and lightening up. Just when you think he's said the most controversial item and he's winding down the joke, he re-commits with Dude, there is an epidemic of gold digging whores in this country. Burr is really coming into his own now. He's right up there with CK in terms of stand up performance and skill.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/16 04:24 PM
1

Evidence and data can get you a long way.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 12:26 PM
–

It shouldn't be about assuming guilt or, on the other side, automatic dismissal. It should be about evidence. Actual evidence presented to the criminal justice system to determine reasonable doubt. If you can't accept that simple premise of "innocent until proven guilty", THE staple of the United States justice system, then you are damned to repeat the barbaric mistakes of unjust societies. It's really that simple. This speaks volumes about the ability of Hillary Clinton to assess shit tier char…
/r/MensRights15/02/16 08:30 PM
9

They want us to see the world as genderless. Then when we analyze the front runner with the gender they like, we find similar, if not worse, flaws than many of the other candidates. How are we to proceed if our aim is truly to ignore gender and choose the best candidates? So, why not just come out and say it: They want you to vote for a woman simply because they want a woman to be president. This is the only truthful statement that can be made about these gender hounds. The fact of the matter is…
/r/MensRights15/02/16 08:09 PM
14

Well sure, just not window lickers with an audience.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 06:26 PM
7

I tend to agree that cases of false accusations have gone up tremendously in recent years and the research has yet to note the change yet.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 06:24 PM
1

As you said, both have things that any reasonable person could call privileges. They are just very different and feminism refuses to acknowledge the existence of women's privileges. The short answer is that no, females are not oppressed and they have not been for generations.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 05:18 PM
23

It's embarrassing, as a human living in the modern age, that there are people with a public voice this disconnected from reality.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 05:12 PM
18

I think that research is going to continue to become more clear in backing up my suspicions, but this idea that false rape accusations are "exceedingly rare" is absurd. There's nothing rare about it. It's not a majority but it's not rare. Meanwhile even if it were "exceedingly rare", that's still not a reason to suspend the foundation of our entire justice system. People who believe things like this who happen to achieve positions of power, are extremely dangerous and should not be dismissed lig…
/r/MensRights13/02/16 05:06 PM
1

I saw an article recently, from the perspective of a black man, that was tired of having things "bernie-splained" to him. Truly, they will wipe their asses with this phrase and it's going to jump the shark pretty quickly.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 12:02 AM
1

It would be nice if they used the urbandictionary definition of the word.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 03:19 PM
1

Color me surprised. It's the same old bulllshit when they tried to say that music causes devil worship or video games caused violence. These people have had their opportunity to drag video games (and men) though the mud and it's time to start slapping them down with science and calling their arguments out for what they are.....nonsense.
/r/MensRights11/02/16 01:44 AM
11

Wife moves out with kids, does not tell me where she is going. How that's not kidnapping is beyond me. They wonder why men are GTOW and joining MRA groups. Because it's fucking legal to steal our children when you get huffy.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/16 10:55 PM
5

Not to mention, your children are statistically far better off with their father in their life. So, she's destroying the children's lives because she's mad at their father. It's the most selfish perspective imaginable but it's the modern Western woman....eternally arrogant that they don't need men to raise children. It's a crime against innocent children to be raised without the influence of their father.
/r/TheRedPill10/02/16 10:53 PM
17

This is what they simply don't/can't grasp. They say we are defending rapist a when the reality is we're simply defending the same standard of evidence that exists for literally every other crime.
/r/MensRights10/02/16 12:54 PM
10

The only action is to keep defendants secret as well.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 09:14 PM
1

It's not that any case that is simply acquitted should lead to that punishment, it should be when there is overwhelming evidence that what an accuser is intentionally fabricated and has malicious intent.
/r/MensRights09/02/16 09:13 PM
1

It's always an awkward moment when you accidentally spill too much inane feminist drivel into the public than the public cares to hear. We all agree that men should be thrown into ovens!" "THE FUCK?" "Oh, Sorry. I misspoke."
/r/MensRights08/02/16 07:52 PM
0

Also, the man's decision to have sex is the same as the woman's so their argument falls flat on it's face easily. There are two parties having sex and once that consensual act is complete and pregnancy occurs one of them has all the rights and the other one has none.
/r/MensRights08/02/16 07:46 PM
2

Education in womens studies and the like is about as respectable as the education of someone who goes to seminary school.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 04:36 PM
3

This article is scandal rag garbage. No well educated person blames men for everything that's gone wrong with human kind with no mention of women. This is just the words "I hate men" in article form. Meanwhile I have to wonder why it's acceptable for an author to condone the culling of men like we're overpopulated wild hogs but one blogger satirically suggests that rape should be legalized and it causes massive outrage. Now, you tell me, whose more fucked in the head?
/r/MensRights07/02/16 02:20 PM
25

If women manage to snake their way out of student loan debt and leave men on the hook, the gloves would be off. I'd dedicate the rest of my life to men's rights as opposed to just having a passive interest and donating from time to time.
/r/MensRights07/02/16 02:13 PM
5

I can't speak to their mental stability but female rugby players are a special brand.
/r/MensRights06/02/16 11:32 AM
3

It has been clear from the beginning that governments will fabricate charges and spend whatever they have to, in order to make an example of people who divulge material that makes them look bad.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 05:18 PM
1

Hopefully Twitter won't kowtow to the lowest common denominator of feefees.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 05:03 PM
2

I have no evidence of this, only a suspicions, but I'd be willing to bet that the driving force behind circumcision in the west are primarily males.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 04:59 PM
1

You'd hate to make enemies of the very people whose vote your depending on to get elected.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 04:57 PM
2

I've been reading what these people have been writing for a number of years. I can assure that any suggestion of personal responsibility will lead to accusations of victim blaming. That's one of the fundamental differences between this group and the rest of us: We're willing to take personal responsibility for ourselves at any opportunity. They're content making the rest of the world responsible for them.
/r/MensRights05/02/16 04:56 PM
10

So...the answer to "discrimination"....is discrimination?
/r/MensRights05/02/16 04:53 PM
1

Best of luck, guys. With the outright dishonesty flying around about this subreddit, the majority of Reddit would likley just shrug their shoulders if this place got banned. I hope that doesn't happen. I think it would be the straw that broke the camel's back for me to say goodby to this place forever. I may not agree with everything I read here but banning this subreddit would be a very CLEAR execution of censorship as a result of extreme bias on the part of Reddit Administration. I can underst…
/r/TheRedPill05/02/16 03:04 AM
13

This goes back to the feminist tendency to use the logical fallacies called kafkatrapping and the Fallacy of Presumption. In their mind, ANYONE who does not want to vote for the woman is being a misogynist, regardless of their reasoning for not wanting to vote for that woman. She could have sacrificed 10 children at the alter of Molach....You're a misogynist if you don't vote for a woman, we STILL have institutionalized sexism, and feminism is proven once more. I'm fairly certain that falls into…
/r/MensRights03/02/16 06:28 PM
8

I'm completely in the "Anyone but Hillary" camp (if for no other reason than her obvious corruption and potential criminal activity) but you should be careful when saying htat "Most people are sick of robots", when the reality of that statement is "Most politically savvy people are sick of robots." This sounds self serving, but it's true. The trouble with it is that people who are politically savvy, I think, tend to overestimate the amount of people out there who are informed of complex politica…
/r/MensRights03/02/16 06:10 PM
4

"Feminist Teacher" Just shoot me in the face.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 03:05 AM
2

It's likley a lesson or example of the wage gap. Nevermind that it's been debunked more times than I care to count....we still need to keep reinforcing the idea so we make sure we raise women with the same level of perceived victimhood as we do black people.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 03:03 AM
10

Thus demonstrating the absurdity of the concept of "privilege" when it's actually applied. It makes sense on the surface which is why they can attract people to the idea but, in action, it's the most ridiculous way to approach the problem of racism and sexism one can imagine.
/r/MensRights31/01/16 02:18 PM
1

I know there's a lot of shit we can extrapolate from this due to the gender political bullshit we're seeing these days, but honestly the "Barbie" doll hadn't been changed for half a century. I mena, boys identify with toys and characters when their children. I kind of understand the move to make Barbie more proportionate if the have the technology to do so (Where they may not have decades ago). The "Fat acceptance" part of this is another story.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/16 06:52 PM
2

Cause of Death: Choked on Bratwurst.
/r/MensRights29/01/16 03:50 PM
6

I'd love to see what would be said.
/r/TheRedPill28/01/16 08:50 PM
3

Even BTC is traceable if whoever is auditing your funds is astute. Purchasing it is another fiasco. There's still evidence of a transaction OUT of your bank and perhaps even to whoever sold you the BTC. Then the ledger (blockchain) is completely open and free to download a view to all, thus every Bitcoin/fraction of a Bitcoin that can be traded can be tracked. The best way to achieve any amount of savings that's actually safe is to perform services and collect payment via BTC and keep the accoun…
/r/TheRedPill28/01/16 08:47 PM
1

With the unemployment rate already at 44% I'd say they're well on their way too.
/r/TheRedPill28/01/16 02:38 AM
3

Gosh....imagine the fallout if a woman made a Donald Trump "Bad Hair" joke.
/r/MensRights26/01/16 02:54 AM
6

Replace the word "Patriarchy" with the word "Illuminati" and you get a glimpse into how truly absurd their bullshit actually is.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 07:34 PM
31

This is so cool. I remember what it was like my last year of high school trying to get grants and scholarships but people telling me I may as well not even try because I was a white male. I may look into donating to this if they are actually allowed to award it.
/r/MensRights25/01/16 07:31 PM
10

She embodies everything toxic about the public face of modern feminism. -Professional victim who only makes money BECAUSE of her ability to play the victim. -Rabid, diehard followers who listen and trusts anything she says. -Latches on to a very successful market (games) and demands that the market change based on her feelings. -Fraud -Liar -Hypocrite -Stifles discussion -Refuses to debate. When your paradigm completely and totally sustains itself by your entire cult collectively putting its fin…
/r/MensRights25/01/16 04:30 AM
13

High school was a huge dry spell for almost everyone (no one wanted you to believe that, of course). When I left for college on an athletic scholarship, then CAME BACK to my small town for the summer, that's when life changed dramatically. Athletes body + SMV increase due to being in college.
/r/TheRedPill25/01/16 03:32 AM
7

The research on how important a male figure is in raising children have been established and is absolutely clear on several levels. Children raised without a father figure are more likely to live in poverty, become addicted to drugs and alcohol, less likely to achieve in academics, and more likely to suffer from psychological problems. Ultimately the practice of legal systems removing fathers from their children needs to be seen for what it is: child abuse.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 04:06 PM
1

I graduated over 15 years ago. I was not raised in a particularly wealthy household but we got by. I was a top tier athlete at my school and was easily in the top 10% of my graduating class with plenty of extracurriculars. I remember going down the list of potential scholarships to help pay for what my sports scholarship did not. They were ALL for women and minorities. I was told, in no uncertain terms, that I may as well not apply or even look for scholarships because id be wasting my time. Tur…
/r/TheRedPill23/01/16 02:48 PM
3

I'd imagine he's got quite a legal bill at this point. Plus his career is likely ruined. All based on her fee fees.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 10:03 PM
2

So....does this scammer have to pay his legal bills?
/r/MensRights22/01/16 09:58 PM
5

claiming that she would lose her medical license (she claimed to be a neurologist) Wow. That's where the entitlement comes from. I've met a good few female doctors (usually students or recent graduates) who are like this. A couple who grew up wealthy and only went to medical school to land a husband while having no intention of practicing medicine.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 12:27 AM
-1

It's always a shame to me to see someone that beautiful who will be nothing but waste space on the planet and, if she can manage to keep her shit together more than a year, ruin some poor bastard's life. Just sickening.
/r/MensRights22/01/16 12:23 AM
1

I do not have all of the details of your situation, but from my perspective of what you've said so far, this does not sound like a healthy relationship dynamic. She's either going to accept that you're going to grow up and move out of the house or she won't. You don't really have control of how she will react to that fact and, quite frankly, that's not your burden to bear. What is your burden is having the strength to stand up for yourself when it comes time to tell her that you need to be indep…
/r/MensRights18/01/16 03:52 PM
2

I would doubt that your mom is the type to ever admit she's wrong so there's really no reason to get into debates or discussions at all. Just go your own path and nod your head when she gets into those rants. People with that kind of hate and negativity brewing that near the surface can be toxic to the people around them...so be aware of that when you are around her. Best to just be your own person. Move out of the house as soon as you can, like a dorm in college or even a small apartment close …
/r/MensRights18/01/16 02:54 PM
4

as their non-negotiable starting point for any debate is that they are right It's amazing how consistent this is. If you don't recognize that the foundation of their ideology as correct, you aren't even allowed to discuss anything past that. It's that kind of denial, that refusal to address legitimate criticisms of their dogma, that makes me certain that there's a severe flaw in their paradigm. However, because they are SO certain that they're right, no one who joins the movement ever actually e…
/r/MensRights18/01/16 02:48 PM
10

When you follow the feminist rabbit hole far enough, you will almost always find yourself at totalitarianism.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 02:36 PM
6

Or just a plain ol guy who fucks an "art" major.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 03:45 AM
9

They're too busy creating and carrying out their own bigotry.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 03:38 AM
2

It's become SO easy to shit down too but the blind faith is nothing short of religious fervor.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 05:58 PM
1

naïveté First time hearing that one. /r/mensrights....Come for the Controversy, stay for the vocabulary lesson.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 05:56 PM
1

Colbert hasn't been what I expected tbh (not even taking this video into the equation). He works better as satire.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 05:53 PM
1

There was a video, though, that went through the data from an RP perspective. I was hoping to come across that specifically and I've had no luck.
/r/askTRP11/01/16 06:49 PM
1

Always the whipping boy.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 01:48 AM
1

Gotta love the Molyneux when your into having years of denial hit you square in the chest. Those were hard books to read.
/r/TheRedPill11/01/16 12:42 AM
3

Seriously, can someone do a summary? I'm not really an auditory learner and the entire video is just one single graph and you can't even read the text.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 09:47 PM
11

This is a science subreddit, so you'll need to provide sources to back up your claim that white privilege doesn't exist. -Moderator of /r/psychology Holy fucking shit.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 09:30 PM
2

It must be true....you said it, right? No need for any proof, you're just right. Gosh, to be infallible.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 09:24 PM
2

This is what feminists actually believe.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 09:14 PM
7

Why the fuck would they do that? So the title is a bit shitty, big deal. Other than an incredible bias against the reality that this research represents I can't think of one good reason the post should just simply be deleted in full like that.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 09:11 PM
17

I have already been violated by both Paul and Columbia University once. It is extremely upsetting that Paul would violate me again — this time, with the help of a reporter, Cathy Young. I just wanted to fix the problem of sexual assault on campus — I never wanted this to be an excuse for people to dig through my private Facebook messages and frame them in a way as to cast doubt on my character. It’s unfair and disgusting that Paul and Cathy would treat personal life as a mine that they can dig t…
/r/MensRights10/01/16 04:15 PM
1

I'd bet that the culture this girl was raised in had a tendency to produce strongly masculine traits but, living in the the United States where we've been cultivating our men to be blue pill betas from birth, there's not many masculine men in the dating pool that meet the standard of masculinity she's used to. This problem is going to get a lot worse before it gets better, especially considering that the current young generation is far more BP beta than anything I ever saw coming up. The way I s…
/r/TheRedPill10/01/16 02:59 PM
2

I wonder if that feminist paid Incubus's record label for the right to use their song.
/r/MensRights10/01/16 03:40 AM
2

Feminism is about the destruction of gender identities. Rather than accepting the biological elements of binary masculinity and femininity, it reduces them to mere social constructs, and then does irreparable psychological harm by confusing men and women alike. I suspect that this is a fulcrum of contention of this entire debate, however IMO, when it comes to discussions about gender, no truer words have been spoken.
/r/TheRedPill03/01/16 04:33 PM
3

It's funny how banning dissenting opinions is so foreign to this group while, in their subreddits, it's simply standard procedure.
/r/MensRights03/01/16 04:08 AM
2

The article is NOT about her, it's a response to the SJW cult and feminism...well worth a read.
/r/MensRights03/01/16 03:27 AM
1

It was....no idea who wrote it.
/r/MensRights03/01/16 03:26 AM
3

So, according to their own publication here...women can't be held responsible for their actions when they drink, unlike men. By that logic, women are obviously equivalent to helpless children, not smart enough to make their own decisions? Why would we let them drive, or vote, or be alone with children if they can't even take responsibility for their actions? Kind of waters down the narrative that women are "strong and independant", that we're all supposed to be swallowing, doesn't it?
/r/MensRights03/01/16 02:59 AM
1

K
/r/MensRights02/01/16 09:08 PM
1

Well, he's always been a pretty big proponent of "Personal Responsibility". I guess what I meant is that misogyny is a supposed to be a pretty specific thing, like racism, in that it's a maltreatment of women for no other reason than simply being women in the same way one might form a negative opinion of a person simply because of the color of their skin. I never really got that vibe from him. The whole single mother thing was a big deal for a while (not just with Molyneux but also in places lik…
/r/MensRights02/01/16 06:09 PM
0

The post was clearly ad hominem. It attacked the character and not the argument. Anyway, I'd be interested in how you might be defining "Misogyny". I was into Stefan in the past but I've kind of moved on, so I'm familiar with the way that he speaks and that he speaks colorfully. Could you provide a specific example of what you mean, in terms of misogyny?
/r/MensRights02/01/16 05:59 PM
1

Anyone who puts Ellen Pao on a victim list gets their article closed. There are a lot of very successful women CEOs out there....she was not one of them. She had an extraordinarily shady character and her decisions were poor enough that created a mass exodus from the site, almost destroying it.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 03:03 PM
1

Stupid sheep too. It makes no sense economically and the evidence it doesn't exist is plain to see. If the market value of women's work was less but their performance was equal, companies would be falling all over themselves to fill their companies with the cheaper labor.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 02:55 PM
3

Right? As if men who are elected don't already represent 50% of the people who elected them (I.e. Women). Women did, after all, help vote these people into power. They have the right to vote...so any arguments about how they are under represented are absurd unless you say they they're being disenfranchised....and they're not. These days I'm more concerned about anyone being represented at all than I am one gender or the other not being represented.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 02:48 PM
0

People have been leveling that on him for years. What your leaving out is that he doesn't come to your house and kidnap you into his compound where everyone commits suicide. If people watch the video and it makes sense, then they lean something....good for them. Thats as far as it has to go. You either choose to like it or not. You either choose to donate to him or not. What your doing here is a logical fallacy called ad hominem. You attack the person instead of the argument.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 02:44 PM
2

She almost destroyed a males life for no reason.....who cares?
/r/MensRights02/01/16 01:54 PM
3

It's always discouraging how few people actually execute healthy advice. Concerning, really.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/16 11:13 PM
3

So very true. When I counsel my patients on weight loss after surgery (after knee or hip replacements for example) m, I always tell them not to rely on a continuing supply of motivation. Motivation is useful but it is fleeting. Discipline and preparing yourself for the challenge so you're ready to push through them, is the only way to succeed at completing hard tasks that take time.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/16 09:26 PM
1

Article is ok. Not great. No real developments in the case just kind of rehashing.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 08:51 PM
1

Certainly been a good year for, at the very least, bringing attention to these issues that affect men and boys. My hope is that the people like Erin Pizzey, Warren Farrell, and Karen Straughn continue to solidify their role as spokespeople for men. We need very level headed, intellectual and academic people to lead the charge, and also drown out some of the noise that all the different factions of the "manosphere" tend to create. I'm really looking forward to "The Red Pill" movie, too.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 08:43 PM
2

rape culture, where cis white males are covering up rapes and/or rape victims are being discouraged to report to police. All, notably, things that require absolutely no evidence other than their insistence to exist. It gets really irritating to see how completely made up this shit is and how few people actually call them on the blatant lack of evidence in their claims.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 04:12 AM
2

This is great. Just out off curiosity, does anyone have any (or know if any studies are coming out) more concrete data on spousal abuse allegations?...specifically those surrounding divorce proceedings.
/r/MensRights01/01/16 04:11 AM
3

That's fascinating. Far more than I would have expected for TRP considering I thought it was more of a niche thing. There must really be a lot of men out there just fed up with playing the rigged game and swallowing the stock standard explanations of sexual relationships. I would wager a guess that /r/mensrights with a focus on laws and activism would attract a crowd of older males who have "Seen some shit" while TRP would generally attract a younger crowd interested in NOT getting hosed by the …
/r/MensRights31/12/15 08:14 PM
2

It’s a trend Murray Maltz, who has been practising family law for 27 years, has also noticed. But there are no studies, no way to quantify the problem, and, most troubling, no solutions at hand. When someone makes a complaint, police must lay charges. Goddammit, how can there be no way to quantify the problem? No way to look at the data? Are you fucking kidding me? Every step of the process is recorded? Criminal charges and accusations are public knowledge. What's the fucking hold up?
/r/MensRights31/12/15 08:08 PM
1

Even if you record everything that happens and you have a completely seamless case a woman can still cry abuse. If you get a white knight cop that comes to the house it can give her enough of a foothold to completely destroy what's left of your family life and take the family home while you become an accused criminal. It's insult to injury when you're going through a divorce. As if the splitting of a family isn't bad enough.....men and the court system have to continuously give credence to milli…
/r/MensRights31/12/15 08:05 PM
2

...what's interesting is that one side of the argument doesn't just "not notice" it, they refuse to accept any claim whatsoever because it disagrees with their narrative. Somehow, that seems to be enough for almost no one except a vocal minority to bring it up.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 07:58 PM
4

She is a victim of her own stupidity.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 05:03 PM
4

It's got to be understood that we're not dealing with people who are rational here. These people should be thought of the same way as radical religious fundamentalists. All of the stops have to be pulled out to ensure that these kinds of people NEVER have positions of power or influence over others.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 03:17 PM
1

Would love to see what they're going to define as 'evidence' in cases like these. I've no doubt that women are emotionally abused but what's the standard of proof that prevents this kind of legislation itself from being abused (I.e. he said she said but we believe her because she has a vagina).
/r/MensRights30/12/15 12:21 AM
3

Still also waiting on evidence that ADHD minds are all at a demonstrable disadvantage. Myself and many other people I've met along the way have been diagnosed and once they found their niche they can be extraordinarily successful.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 12:16 AM
6

Why not just come together to get rid of the draft?
/r/MensRights28/12/15 06:51 PM
18

4.0 feminism is filtered through hypocrisies jockstrap.
/r/MensRights28/12/15 04:06 AM
7

There was a post on here few days ago speaking positively about the movie, requesting that, for one night, we remove the red pill glasses and simply watch the movie for what it was. So I did. Even putting the rp glasses back on, I can't say that I'm bothered by this movie. Unlike what the Ghostbusters reboot seems to be, the feeling of a female hero/lead shoehorned into a role they don't belong in simply didn't occur to me while watching this. I understand that movies can have tremendous impact …
/r/TheRedPill27/12/15 02:26 PM
7

In my experience "mansplaining" is a clever retort by a 4.0 feminist to refuse to yield to logic, reason, and evidence in direct contradiction to their narrative. Also, I'm not sure how you think the whole argument in the picture against the "male tears" meme is "conflated". It seems a pretty precise way to highlight the hypocrisy of modern feminism, exposing the fact that they simply hate white men as opposed to the usual drivel we hear about how much they care about men's issues.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 02:34 AM
9

Jesus, what a great comment. I mean, if feminism still wants to feel relevant there are plenty of women that are actually oppressed in the world who could use their help. The ones bitching about mansplaining in the first world, though, that's something else entirely.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 10:29 AM
8

It really is quite sad how much feminists get away with using anecdote and pseudoscience to justify many of its major talking points.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 02:51 PM
24

Like the article says (this is a very good article btw), he needs to go the distance with the lawsuit. So many of these lawsuits are settled out of court and never publicized. This is very intentional because it protects the universities reputation. He needs to refuse all offers and take it to trial so the world can see how bad this shit is.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 02:35 PM
8

I'm not sure how that's possible. I've been told by every feminist I've come in contact with that feminism and women have no legal power at all.
/r/MensRights11/12/15 02:31 PM
2

Karen, I know you read these threads so I hope you see this. Thank you for your work and your time. Please, do not stop.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 05:13 PM
0

Communication Graduate Caucus and the Gender, Sexuality and Women’s Studies Student Union No.
/r/MensRights10/12/15 04:42 PM
23

I remember when Jessie Ventura was running for governor of Minnesota and he was all about personal responsibility so he wanted to get rid of a lot of welfare for single mothers or students (I don't remember exactly). Anyway he got a question from a single mother who was a student who asked "what about me?" and Jessee pulled no punches. He said something to the effect of, "Well, I'm sorry this is difficult for you but let's remember, it was you who decided to have a child to begin with." Ice cold…
/r/MensRights10/12/15 04:38 PM
2

Measured by "The Patriarchy" = Part of "The Patriarchy."
/r/MensRights10/12/15 04:33 PM
28

Well...then /r/mensrights becomes /r/punchablefaces in the eyes of the hyper-offended Redditors who are buddy buddy with the admins. They already call us a hate group so if the more nefarious members of the community came down on this idiot's facebook page it would play right into that stereotype.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 03:46 AM
9

I see these reversals all the time but they are always really valuable. It really does highlight the unadulterated absurdity that these people have allowed themselves to believe.
/r/MensRights06/12/15 03:44 AM
27

I worry that people are just going to keep ignoring this mentality until it becomes a BIG problem, but this is some serious shit. There's a lot of extremely stupid pseudointellectual people out there who have absolutely no concept of what justice means and how important "Innocent until proven guilty" is to a free society. These people are dangerous and they vote. This isn't the standard tax vs cut tax kind of shit, these people actually think it's a good idea to suspend the very principles of fr…
/r/MensRights06/12/15 03:40 AM
5

You seem to think that the amount of times you put the word "fucking" into a post the stronger your arguments get.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 04:15 AM
4

If you're a male coach or teacher of any girls over the age of 12, consider yourself warned: You need to be hyper-vigilant about ensuring that you A) Are NEVER alone with an athlete or student and B) Never talk about, insinuate, or jest about anything sexual at all. C) Do your best not to make trouble with your students/athletes and, if you run into a sticky situation DOCUMENT EVERYTHING. It's apparently popular for this new generation of ninnies to convince themselves (and others) of events and…
/r/MensRights04/12/15 05:15 PM
9

Dude....dude.....that's not normal. That would never, ever happen at my barbershop. I think you might have a sexual assault case! Of course, my barber is a female.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 04:43 PM
2

Great write up. I really kind of hope he finds it and reads it. Even if he disagrees it's still good to have your perspective challenged from time to time.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/15 02:46 PM
1

I've cried more listening to Eddie Vedder sing or watching the last 20 minutes of Meet Joe Black than I have thinking about my feelings. No one ever taught me that crying was bad I just do it if I feel like it.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 02:34 PM
19

Well you can't discuss man/boy suicide unless 10% of the audience has horn rims, blue hair, and a microphone. It's a rule.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 02:31 PM
5

Wow man....that's more forward than I usually see but I've got to respect the honesty. I genuinely don't hate anyone. I have a problem with the way feminists approach problems and their proposed solutions to complex social problems like inequality.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 02:27 PM
2

Fuck yes. I didn't think this post could get any better until I read your comment.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 02:14 PM
–

Man...I hope this guy gets out of it then sues her for damages. I can't believe someone like this can just bankrupt an innocent person because they feel offended.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 09:58 PM
7

Better throw us all into the ovens, just to make sure.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 02:32 AM
9

These schools have got to stand up to this shit. I think they'll be surprised by how many people stand behind them.
/r/MensRights29/11/15 02:32 AM
2

That's standard operating procedure for SRS. There's no logic allowed there and it's 10 times worse than /rfeminism. The cry baby thing and the like is what they do. Their points can't stand up to debate so they rely on mocking and ostracizing people who disagree.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 04:48 PM
2

Common belief that sex under he influence is rape No. Not really. That's a recent thing and it's extraordinarily controversial. Drunk people have been having sex with sober people and other drunk people throughout human history. You don't get to label every instance of it as rape just because you feel it should be. You certainly do to call it a "common belief." Again we can't throw the baby out with the bath water. Surely some instances of sober on drunk sex is rape...but to label all of it rape…
/r/MensRights15/11/15 04:44 PM
3

While there do seem to be a lot of things about this being "unconfirmed", it does bring up an interesting point which is the acceptance of female on male violence. I would encourage anyone who has had this kind of hypocritical experience with a self-described feminist to get evidence of these claims and go public. Showing that these people saying these things are actually violent, is a very big deal.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 06:53 PM
3

But you don’t need to treat it as a microaggression to find something troubling in it. Above all else, Movember irritates me because it’s not so much about cancer awareness as it is about masculinity awareness. OOOHHHH THE HUMANITY! It starts from the assumption that men are somehow uniquely imperiled—threatened by all these horrible diseases—and then tells us that we can save them by trumpeting an outward signifier of masculinity, the mustache. Yea, that's not what raising awareness for a disea…
/r/MensRights13/11/15 06:43 PM
2

As usual, say this about any other race or gender and you're up shit creek without a paddle. Say it about a white man and you've got millions of supporters behind you. Someone really needs to sit these people down and tell them that their definition of racism (racism=power+prejudice) is completely fabricated and is, in no way, representative of what the word "Racism" actually means.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 06:19 PM
8

She got a year of probation and an $80 fine for pleading guilty to assault.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 06:15 PM
2

I've got to say, that preview looks absolutely awesome. It looks like she's really balanced the argument while attempting to push Mens Rights INTO a position where it has a voice along with feminism as opposed to feminism being the only one allowed to speak. I'm really hopeful about this one.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 04:46 PM
22

The way feminism treats anyone who dares to speak publicly about men's issues is telling. I've yet to see anyone defend that behavior successfully aside from asserting that "Women have far greater problems." The thing is that, I accept that women do have problems that stem from inequality and sexism. I also support rational approaches to solving those problems. Why can't they do the same? Why must we shut our mouths? Why are we automatically dismissed as the hate group? I don't remember calling …
/r/MensRights12/11/15 04:33 PM
11

I need a white knight that's looking to impress a feminist over here.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 03:06 AM
–

There's really no other recourse, really. You can't teach journalism and treat a journalist the way that she did and expect students to take you seriously ever again. A lesson in free speech. You can say what you want but people are going to judge you for it. If she hasn't quit yet, she needs to. She's effectively rendered herself useless.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 03:05 AM
8

"Quality" is a big stretch. There's nothing quality about a person who doesn't have a rational thought in her head.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 12:06 PM
3

Really? Head on over to SRS and watch them lampoon and mock anyone who has the audacity to suggest that Islam might just be a religion fit for violent savages.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 04:37 AM
13

For ten points.... Is what you said against SJW rules because it discriminates against Islamic culture or is it misogynistic because it supports mutilating women?
/r/MensRights10/11/15 04:11 AM
–

If I came out and said all women need their clitoris or their breasts chopped off for cheating, I wonder what kind of response I would get.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 03:28 AM
3

If they won, could this put Rolling Stone out of business or would they have insurance to cover this kind of thing?
/r/MensRights10/11/15 03:26 AM
5

I got an idea. How bout we get rid of the draft, decrease the size of the military tremendously, and make the military and veteran life more appealing so more people volunteer. The military gets pick of the litter. No draft. Problem solved.
/r/MensRights06/11/15 03:07 AM
79

+1 for teaching me the word harridans.
/r/TheRedPill05/11/15 06:34 PM
2

What I like about your post, metaphorically, is that I kind of went down a nice, sugar coated path through the forest and kind of left my conclusions up to interpretation...then you went down that same path and set the entire forest on fire as you went. So, best possible outcome really.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 07:17 PM
3

I'm an expert. I just saved a bunch of money by switching to Geico.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 03:31 PM
2

It's years and years of what we call living "Below the Line". Instead of taking responsibility for their own life they have collectively created a culture where they sit around and blame, criticize, mock, and hate people who, they've convinced themselves, are keeping a boot on their throat. When they become the majority or get close to it then it's no longe nonsense....they can simply inject this toxic garbage directly into the culture and convince otherwise intelligent and capable people that s…
/r/MensRights04/11/15 03:28 PM
4

Any time I read about the education system, I read that women and girls perform consistently better than men in the classroom. Meanwhile, they can't seem to turn this ability to excel into high end jobs? This means that the have the knowledge, they have the opportunity, and a large percentage of them still can't pull it off. Interesting I run a health care business and I can tell you, if there's a chance that a female candidate is sharper in practice or in business than any of the male candidate…
/r/MensRights04/11/15 03:24 PM
1

Ok, that puts a different spin on it. The law shouldn't exist but if the law was applied fairly she should have been charged. This is a problem.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 11:45 PM
8

In that case, I do understand. The law is still absurd but that's a clear case of discrimination.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 05:00 PM
3

Here's to hoping she gets sued into the poor house for that one.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 02:13 PM
–

I think it's interesting how feminism supposedly cares about men and mens issues while at the same time giving us the impression that, because it's just too challenging to execute every man on the planet, they'll send them to "Don't rape" classes as a consolation....because, you know, we've got to do something to control these feral beasts. I find it difficult to wrap my head around how something so blatantly and viciously hateful toward half of the species can gain so much ground.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 02:12 PM
12

I don't like this maniacal half wit any more than the next person but I'm not sure I would like the precedent that convicting her of a crime would set. Yes, she's dangerously stupid and had absolutely no business being the diversity officer of a university and the university who hired her should be ashamed of themselves and embarrassed. Yes, she should be fired for being an incompetent, hateful bigot. ...but still, an incompetent, hateful bigot simply creating the hashtag #killallwhitemen isn't …
/r/MensRights03/11/15 02:03 PM
2

What's really interesting though is that it's not far from what I've experienced. I've never seen or heard of a modern feminist who has successfully navigated a relationship. If their relationship wasn't already on the rocks, it was easily predictable. As soon as you see an article about "mansplaining" pop up on their Facebook feed, you could be absolutely certain that their relationship was doomed in less than a month. They're just miserable people. I would pay as much attention to them except,…
/r/TheRedPill02/11/15 01:16 PM
6

The professional victimhood carousel goes at full speed these days. Say outlandish shit that's sexist, racist, or hateful about men or white people. Create enormous backlash. Focus on the negative comments of that backlash. Feign Victimhood. Get attention/publicity. Gain Sympathy Achieve power. Repeat.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 08:00 PM
11

It's really quite embarrassing how easily feminists can roll over, mock, and downplay mens rights. Modern feminism is such nonsense too. There's so much of it that has absolutely no basis in reality It's hard to even argue. It's like arguing against a religion with someone who just points straight at their book for the "Evidence".
/r/MensRights01/11/15 07:56 PM
7

Feminist love to mock those of us who insist that they have power in government, but they really do. The Education system, for example, is absolutely saturated with feminist thought. No other mechanism of solving gender/racial issues has occurred to them because feminism is all they know, all they were taught, and all they were likely exposed to in university. They don't even have to necessarily be radical, the paradigm by which they filter any/all problems is simply feminist by their very natur…
/r/MensRights01/11/15 07:50 PM
3

But.....you have to understand that it's going to be confused with the actual TRP organization.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 06:05 PM
1

Not sure I like the idea of them calling it "The Red Pill." That's a very specific offshoot of mens organization.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 06:03 PM
2

I need to know if he is looking towards marriage. If I don't, than I might waste my time. If I do, I might scare him away even if he was interested. I always find it promising when I read that men can be spooked out of marriage so easily. Gives me hope for the future when the problem reaches critical mass and not a single man will be dumb enough to sign away his life to that contract.
/r/TheRedPill22/10/15 01:38 AM
–

The time is right. This mentality has gotten out of control. One can be aggressively against sexual assault and not simultaneously criminalize half of the species as "guilty until proven innocent".
/r/MensRights20/10/15 07:50 PM
2

It's funny you mention conspiracy OP. I've always associated their faith in the notion of "Patriarchy" in the same way that a conspiracy theorist might believe in the notion of "The Illuminati." Patriarchy, by it's nature, is impossible to quantify or prove. It's just a collection of cultural behaviors that they can then use to direct their wand of oppression at people and say "It's you....you are the evil one." It's all, just like any dogmatic adherence to nonsensical beliefs, bullshit. It's so…
/r/TheRedPill20/10/15 05:09 PM
10

Capitalism, in a nutshell. Diametrically opposed to any entitlement mentality. This idea will be completely lost on them because everything they know and have invested their little feefees into is based solely around "Who is the largest victim and thus is entitled to the most compensation?" while completely forgetting that the world actually needs strong, productive, non-victims to create and produce things like the little computers they love blogging on.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 04:48 PM
8

It's hard to imagine the idea of taking care of your body and learning the art of being confident in yourself will be a "fad". However, I've underestimated collective stupidity before. Ultimately, it's simply a reclaiming and embracement of masculinity. Not hate or maliciousness necessary...just the strength to be confident men.
/r/TheRedPill20/10/15 01:24 AM
119

That's something that attracted me to Red Pill. I don't always agree with many of the posters and perspectives here but what RP is, at its core, is a plan of action. It's a behavioral step forward as opposed to simply acknowledging and wallowing in the diagnosis of the problem.
/r/TheRedPill19/10/15 08:29 PM
1

No. Male birth control will happen far before anyone admit that double standard.
/r/MensRights19/10/15 02:10 PM
8

No, you are not alone. The up and coming generation in high school seem to be infected with it and it is, most certainly, getting worse. It's even rearing its head in post grad settings. It make me nervous as a business owner who has to hire people for the next 20 years. Not looking forward to that.
/r/MensRights18/10/15 11:49 AM
1

You'd just have to be incredibly stupid.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 10:49 PM
1

Not that I'm being critical, just interested....but what influence does Judaism or Jewish people have on it big city culture?
/r/TheRedPill13/10/15 10:26 PM
2

They will never be banned. They've violated the rules every day for years. It's clear that the Administration wants them around for whatever reason.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 07:09 PM
2

...I would argue that they have actively encouraged it.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 07:01 PM
46

Women who don't live in big cities and were not raised in one often are a bit more down to earth, I find. I think large cities are far more conducive to this detrimental behavior and attitude we see in women.
/r/TheRedPill12/10/15 02:31 PM
14

God damn soggy knees.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 06:30 PM
30

For heaven's sake. This nonsense just isn't going away. This is one of those bullshit theories we're going to have to march blindly into the future until people start to notice it's incredible failure, isn't it? Strap in white men. This is going to get worse before it gets better.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 01:52 PM
2

Yep. We talk a lot here and other places about how important free speech is. Our words are hollow if we don't respect their right to speak their crazy thoughts.
/r/MensRights08/10/15 01:19 PM
3

for millions of young women who dream about a wedding day that may never come. You reap what you sew. Decades and decades of ever increasing obsession with the pomp and circumstance of a single, attention whoring day that starts a marriage in a perpetual state of debt in addition to the debt of student loans. I can't imagine why young men don't want to get married.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/15 05:12 PM
1

That's the way that it should be. Because there isn't as many females as there are male fighters. It's a rare commodity. It's still a rare thing because not as many females are doing it as much as males. The simple fact is that women can't do "anything" men can do when it comes to most sports. They can do something similar, but certainly not equivalent. This makes them less appealing to audiences and this less profitable when it comes to events. Certainly there are exceptions to that which is wh…
/r/MensRights05/10/15 12:26 AM
1

Yes, the "I've got it harder than you." Sense of entitlement seems to be in right now.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 12:18 AM
9

There are no valid arguments that stand up to logical scrutiny. Only shitty laws and that's all it takes.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/15 02:45 AM
20

This woman is worthless. She has done nothing of real value with her life besides convince a highly successful and highly talented multi-millionaire to marry her. That, in no way shape or form, entitles her to any of his money after she chooses to leave the marriage. Yet somehow we still have this legalized theft under the guise of "the lifestyle they are accustomed too." Let's get this straight, women. After you leave a marriage and separate the property, you are not entitled to shit after that…
/r/TheRedPill04/10/15 02:41 AM
–

The thing about this kind of depression is that it's quiet. It doesn't seem to be the overt, drag yourself around the house and try to go outside as little as possible kind of depression. It's just the loneliness that comes with years of sitting in front of screens that builds up over time. Eventually, the best years of life are gone and they have "online" social skills but they don't have the slightest clue how to find a companion in the real world. They have dead end jobs and the schools don't…
/r/MensRights03/10/15 05:57 PM
5

The idea of personal responsibility is completely lost on these people, though. They're supporting a culture of "Blame everyone else but yourself for your problems." It catches on like wildfire because it's an easy answer to a complex question. It's easier to use any excuse you can find to paint yourself as a victim than it is to go out and take responsibility for your own future.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 08:33 PM
4

Sleep in the bed you make. Feminism has overreached and the natural result of that will be detrimental to women.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 02:06 PM
5

I encourage you to read the posted material as they have done an extraordinarily good job and spent a lot of time listing and debunking the sources in this report. However, as teaser, it turns out over half of the sources used in the UN report on "Cyber 'Violence' Against Women"....whatever obscure definition of violence they invented to create that name....are completely invalid as they either do not exist at all and have absolutely nothing to do with the material in the report. It's no surpris…
/r/MensRights27/09/15 02:03 PM
2

Harassment is common for public figures. These women chose to come at an industry with extraordinarily controversial accusations backed by extraordinarily poor research and absolutely no peer review. They do not have the right to be free of criticism from the more vocally aggressive members of the public. There are controversial public figures on every continent and in every country that get a significant amount of verbal abuse hurled at them on an hourly basis. The only difference between them …
/r/MensRights27/09/15 01:51 PM
3

The contrast between the seriousness of the Sarkeesian one VS Quinn going straight for the cock had me rolling.
/r/MensRights27/09/15 01:39 PM
9

One thing that remains 100% consistant is that I have never seen one single shred of evidence proving that these feminist recieve death threats. Not one screenshot, not one voicemail recording if they claim to be called. I'm not saying they don't exist but at this point they're making claims and they have ZERO evidence. It's "Shameful" to ask for proof these days though, as asinine as that sounds. It's simple to me....if they have something to gain by manipulating the truth, then if they make a …
/r/TheRedPill26/09/15 11:57 PM
22

On this same topic, if you haven't seen this yet, you should. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2015/09/25/u-n-womens-group-calls-for-web-censorship/ Sarksleezian, Briana WU, and Zoe Quinn (of GamerGate fame) were INVITED TO THE FUCKING UN to speak about, of all things, freedom of speech online. They get to go to the UN to play their professional victim card.
/r/TheRedPill26/09/15 06:57 PM
10

It is embarassing. That's the best word for it. Absolutely shameful. There are soooo many controversial figures out there that get "Harassed" the same way or more than these delicate flowers. Why on earth would you invite them to the UN to speak on internet Free Speech? I'd feel more comfortable if Kim Jong Un was speaking on the topic, he'd probably recommend less censorship.
/r/MensRights26/09/15 06:52 PM
8

People go after Politicians when they say stupid shit, they go after Al Sharpton, Glenn Beck, Nancy Grace, and Bill O'Reilly, and a whole host of public figures when they're blatantly and demonstrably wrong or hateful. These people are still out there...they're still chugging along. They deal with it because it comes with the job of being a controversial public figure. And here we have three delicate flowers who are public figures that simply can't handle all of the "Harassment". What's differen…
/r/MensRights26/09/15 06:50 PM
15

If there were any other way to say it, then we would. People go after Politicians when they say stupid shit, they go after Al Sharpton, Glenn Beck, Nancy Grace, and Bill O'Reilly, and a whole host of public figures when they're blatantly and demonstrably wrong or hateful. These people are still out there...they're still chugging along. They deal with it because it comes with the job of being a controversial public figure. And here we have three delicate flowers who are public figures that simply…
/r/MensRights26/09/15 06:48 PM
–

According to feminist culture critic Anita Sarkeesian, who spoke at the event They're letting someone who's cherry picked work and persona that's been completely propped up by lies speak at the fucking UN? She's sitting there next to Zoe Quinn and Brianna Wu. Is this some kind of cruel joke? How in the blue fuck do these people get the ear of the UN? How is this even possible? Shouldn't the UN be advised by people who actually know what they're talking about and can support their claims with evi…
/r/MensRights26/09/15 06:40 PM
2

I get the feeling that all the fighting and blaming and shitty family court laws is specifically designed by and for lawyers. Both sexes think one or the other is to blame when really it's just the lawyers taking them both to the cleaners.
/r/TheRedPill26/09/15 01:56 AM
–

If you're white, male, and straight you could wait your entire life and not see a feminist care one bit about you. This kid happens to be all three so, of course, we get crickets.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 09:41 PM
1

*whtie flag
/r/MensRights25/09/15 12:19 AM
12

The article on Wikipedia concerning Zoe Quinn is telling and exemplifies how SJW extremists have, as you said OP, tried to control the narrative. Here's a quote from the Zoe Quinn page in the section on gamergate (emphasis mine): Based on claims in the post Quinn was falsely accused of receiving positive coverage from a journalist she was in a relationship with.[14] Falsely accused, you say? Just what is this source #14, you might ask? A completely unbiased *COUGH article with the title #GamerGa…
/r/TheRedPill22/09/15 05:14 PM
1

We need to know the definition of sexual harassment before we can take this shit seriously. If 'unsolicited touching' is being counted, right along side the dictionary definition "rape", it's a sure sign that the study is meant to serve talking points more than provide valuable data.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 03:00 PM
0

I would, very much, like to take this test myself to see if I can do this. I have a hunch that I can.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 02:57 PM
3

It's a bit of sarcasm layered on top of a bit of truth. Sorry to offend.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 12:25 AM
4

if marriage was abolished as an archaic institution This, I think, is the answer. I don't see any reason that the state should be involved in a romantic relationship. A civil contract, specifying what happens in advance in case of a dissolution. Kind of shooting from the hip.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 11:04 PM
3

(https://imgflip.com/i/re9zh)
/r/MensRights21/09/15 08:28 PM
17

That's good. I'm just speaking from my experience and also looking at what the court ALLOWS if you actually wanted to press the issue. That's the problem. You're making a choice not to be aggressive, and that's rational and fantastic. Your children will thank you for it when they are 30 as the research showing positive outcomes on kids who are raised by both their mother AND father is extremely clear. I live in a large city, though, in and around a very wealthy area. Divorces here are absolutely…
/r/MensRights21/09/15 08:04 PM
–

If I were a judge, that's exactly what I would do. I'd give her the money then make her pay it all right back to him.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 06:14 PM
11

Women don't believe in risk.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 06:13 PM
23

She's likely convinced herself that her pain as a wife who has had to deal with a husband with such a high need for care deserves part of the compensation plan for her service to him. Of course, this completely removes the fact that this guy is actually experiencing the pain and suffering associated with a war wound. Women in the midst of divorce are like an indifferent lion who starts eating their prey's intestines while they're still alive. So, where a normal person would see: "Wow, that's a m…
/r/MensRights21/09/15 06:12 PM
1

It's really hard to say. I think there's good possibility that people like us might be in the minority as I hear this idea (saying someone's name to gain trust) touted all over the place from TRP to self help gurus to sales specialists. When someone meets me for the first time, asks my name then uses my name more than a couple of times in a way other than to get my attention, I automatically get suspicious. I had a coworker who used to do it as well when he was trying to sell me on an idea. Drov…
/r/TheRedPill21/09/15 01:39 PM
3

I'm starting to think that the reason feminism seems to lead to failure in relationships is because the principles of feminism, being completely contrived, are contrary to human reproductive habits. Many feminists ignore the very real possibility that biology plays a larger part in human interactions than they allow themselves to believe.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 12:06 PM
2

I think you need to start wearing weighted clothing around to weaken your strength and headphones playing loud noises that counteract your ability to think clearly. Then you have to repent for the sins of your forefathers by donating all of your money to single mothers. You'll still be privileged because there's nothing we can do about your white skin, but you'll no longer be a privileged, neckbearded, misogynistic, racist, privileged shitlord. -Feminism
/r/MensRights20/09/15 11:54 PM
–

I'm in agreement with her but for the opposite reason. That's a 7 alarm fire blazing right in front of this guys face and he seems to be dismissing it as a mild annoyance. No, dude....the woman you're thinking about marrying is getting into an irrational cult that tries to convince ALL women that they're victims and you're the oppressor. Your masculinity is about to become an evil sin. There's a 100% chance that she's going to wreck the relationship, your life, and the lives of your children if …
/r/MensRights20/09/15 11:47 PM
11

No, I think I read somewhere that cocaine and hooking are the leading cause of longevity.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/15 11:42 PM
3

Remember people's names and use them, people like hearing their names. I've got a question about this one. I'm really not a fan of people using my name. To me, when someone who is not a family member calls me by my name, it always seems like they're trying to use a sales technique so it drives me nuts. Just call me "Dude" or "Man" or don't say my name at all...just look me in the eyes and talk to me. Am I the only one that feels this way?
/r/TheRedPill20/09/15 11:27 PM
1

It's not that I'm not allowed to hit my son, it's that I really don't want to based on the likelihood that it could create issues down the road. He's more difficult than most but we have had far more luck with rewards and loss of things he wants (if he doesn't act properly). Hitting never seemed to solve anything.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/15 07:33 PM
12

It should be noted that not a single person (with the looks or personality attractive enough to be a plate) showed up to protest this. So, we can see the feminist delusion in full view and the RedPill physics at play. The one in the middle is wholly unattractive yet feels entitled so she lifts HERSELF, arrogantly and artificially, into the category of a desirable woman. Just shows that much of feminism is simply a reproductive strategy for ugly and undesirable people. What's scary is when desira…
/r/TheRedPill20/09/15 02:35 PM
14

More of a boulder. Who spins boulders?
/r/TheRedPill20/09/15 02:22 PM
7

Well....we should definitely reduce the amount of sexist laws to get more fathers into their kids lives so we can study those numbers more effectively. Even if it is the case that father's abuse more, you still will have positively impacted the lives of millions of children who are not abused and now get to see their goddamn father more than once every two weeks.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/15 02:21 PM
16

SJWs will stoop to anything to make straight white males look evil in the eyes of as many people as possible. Including intentionally confuse senses of humor for actual pedophilia, which we see so much on reddit. If they can succeed at making us evil then it gives them that much more power. I've always been of the opinion that we are truly dealing with very sick people projecting their own sociopathy on to perfectly normal people.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/15 12:27 PM
5

All the more reason not to keep their company.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 01:17 PM
17

They also throw the idea of "Merit" out with the trash. Maybe those females are the highest qualified to lead....maybe the men who would have been in their position have VASTLY higher qualifications or experience. We'll never know because there's a quota based entirely on the appendage between their legs instead of one that actually measures their ability to do the fucking job they're applying for.
/r/MensRights18/09/15 05:57 PM
8

My wife doesn't even play that game any more. It's to the point now that I can just say "that looks like shit" and she doesn't get mad, she's happy that I just gave her honest feedback. It's extremely rare that I would make a comment like that so it's not like I use it as an excuse to be an asshole...just honest. Chances are that if I think it, then others in public will as well.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/15 05:27 PM
1

I live in a large city near a very wealthy area and this is true. Women, especially women with and around wealth, can maintain their looks for a significantly longer period of time than your average Jane. Perhaps surgery or good make up in some cases, but I'm guessing it's mostly the fitness and the food driven by the desire to stay at the top of the ladder.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/15 05:17 PM
1

Add to that no feminist influence and a shortage of men from wars and early deaths from poor lifestyle choices, and you have a market that starts to skew in the favor of men. To piggyback on that and touch on a topic from a few days ago, I guess what you call "a shortage of men" will occur when men start disconnecting entirely from the SMP due to technology and the desire to just not deal with the bullshit. This essentially takes the population of men down drastically, in terms of those actually…
/r/TheRedPill18/09/15 05:14 PM
14

Wow, that's a fascinating bit of information I never knew or would have thought to ask.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/15 01:15 AM
6

It is extremely likely that these "Sex Robots" will hit every/all sexual buttons that men want. In terms of looks and shape, each of them will be PERFECT 10's with respect to their owners taste. I hate to go down this path, but the irony of the situation here is pretty glaring. Looking at the picture of the woman that's objecting to this technology I can't say I'm surprised that her response it what it is (and that feminism in general would reject it as well) as this is one of the most unattract…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 01:28 AM
9

It was a very well written piece and a perfect response to the lunacy that thinks these kinds of robots should, somehow, be banned.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 01:18 AM
4

Also, every single woman listed on that page are multi millionaires who do not have to concern themselves with the survival mechanisms that most single mothers do.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 05:23 PM
1

spackle Top notch lol right there.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 05:22 PM
2

The best past of this article is where the go through this entire single mom sales process then, at the end, they have the audacity to suggest that men need to pamper and romance to earn brownie points. Just unbelievable. I've been in a very strong marriage for over 10 years and the idea of earning "Brownie Points" has never even crossed my mind.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 05:21 PM
2

I'm in the only marriage I will ever have. If I get divorced, that's it. It's hookups and hookers for me forever. While not preferable to a strong and loving relationship, technology and extracurriculars are at a place now where I believe I can sustain any excessive loneliness. Dating a single mother wouldn't even be in the cards. I know that TheRedPill gets a bad rap but it's really opened my eyes to certain behaviors I now see in the divorcing wives and single women around me and helped me und…
/r/MensRights16/09/15 05:16 PM
33

You've got to be fucking kidding me.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 03:48 PM
22

That law needs to change.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 03:46 PM
6

I'd say if there's some verbiage in Title IX that gives colleges the right to conduct this type of shit, then it needs to be revisited immediately. The Sulkawitz case is a perfect example, but the college's main priority should be to report the incident to law enforcement as quickly as possible and to ensure that the identity of ALL parties involved including the victim and the accused are kept a locked down secret. If either party goes around (and perhaps attempt to gain public support) then th…
/r/MensRights16/09/15 03:43 PM
4

As long as the women continue to live comfortably and incapable of experiencing any repercussions for their actions, I'm sure feminism would consider that.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 02:38 AM
2

That money doesn't belong to the man though. It's hers. Because she earned it, you see.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 02:37 AM
8

taking away an advantage from women? An advantage? Much of feminism represents female reproductive strategy. They will stoop to any reasoning, no matter how disgraceful and no matter how nonsensical in order to protect that end. Anything that is a positive/advantage for a female (i.e. getting away with cheating and keeping a man on the hook for financial support of a child that isn't his) most definitely falls in the category of protecting the female reproductive strategy. This is why the men's …
/r/MensRights16/09/15 02:34 AM
3

It's very difficult to put a number to it or even show evidence of what I'm about to say, but my assumption is that if there is a guy who calls himself a feminist, there's an 80% chance that he's doing it to please a girl he's put on a pedestal. The remaining percentage is likely only there for acceptance as feminist pretty much have to accept anyone with a pulse who can also talk the talk.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 06:02 PM
9

It's because a good bit of feminism is there to promote a sexual/reproductive strategy that's advantageous to females....specifically the less attractive females that tend to gravitate toward feminism. Sex robots and dolls reduce the demand on women because men, in many cases, don't like dealing with all the challenges and dangers that come with women and they become less attractive than the doll. This hurts the female sexual strategy. ...and given that feminism seems to put stock in the idea th…
/r/MensRights15/09/15 05:51 PM
1

She has a right to her opinion I suppose. However silly it may be.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 01:36 AM
1

The more I read into it the more academic feminism seems to be entirely dependant on deeper and deeper levels of obfuscation. It's like peeling an onion made of vocabulary words and the deeper you get the more fluid and uncertain the definitions. These are the things faith is made of...not legitimate fields of study.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 01:32 AM
1

Is there any legitimate science or field of study besides feminist dogma that has any evidence of this?
/r/MensRights15/09/15 01:30 AM
7

Could you clarify what you mean?
/r/MensRights14/09/15 06:07 PM
–

You know, I never want to take anything away from people who are raped. I really don't. I don't want to blame them or shame them or anything like that. However, we live in a society of laws and the justice system that applies those laws MUST be fair. It must be balanced. So, if it is to be fair and balanced then we can't go allowing accusations with no physical evidence (or third party witness testimony) in a "he said / she said" situation to destroy people's academic futures. Regardless of gend…
/r/MensRights14/09/15 04:12 PM
2

MUH SOGGY KNEES!
/r/MensRights14/09/15 02:20 PM
6

I thought you were exaggerating...turns out you're right. I can't speak for the financial incentive but it turns out that foreskins actually have quite the journey after they are removed. (http://www.babble.com/mom/3-strange-uses-for-infant-foreskins/)
/r/MensRights14/09/15 12:37 AM
4

It's a strange thing to ask a hyper-aggressive, hitleresque lesbian what her opinion is about men. Is anyone surprised she just thinks that men are unnecessary and need to be in camps? Her entire interview reads like some perverted sickos genocidal lesbian fantasies.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 11:50 PM
16

Privileged shitlords get to sit there in their cages getting three meals a day for free.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 11:29 PM
5

Yea. There are luckily still lot against it. IIRC The U.S. Pediatrics association is against it which is the one that caused a lot of controversy a few years ago.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 10:32 PM
2

Strangely enough, I've actually heard that the financial incentives of performing circumcisions are pretty low and may not be the driving force behind the recommendations. That may very well be wrong because I only heard it once but if it is right then I really don't understand why the associations would take this direction.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 09:15 PM
1

Sorry, what's a dead tree equivalent?
/r/MensRights13/09/15 07:41 PM
1

THen, I'm sure, there will be a completely new set of "weeds".
/r/TheRedPill13/09/15 04:45 PM
7

I'm at a loss for words. If you want to be really angry, read the interview. Keep in mind that this kind of ideological radicalism is based on absolutely no data other than what these people conjure in their heads. It's not science and it has virtually no data to back up the idea that human sexuality and gender is some kind of cultural construct as opposed to a biological mechanism. This kind of feminism is a political philosophy much like Marx. Intellectuals who use big words, many of them they…
/r/MensRights13/09/15 04:14 PM
3

political lesbian Because we should always strive to treat men the way a radical lesbian thinks we should? What in the blue fuck are people thinking putting this woman on a pedestal? Her opinion rolled into reality would literally mean the end of the human race....but it doesn't affect her in her lifetime because she's a lesbian.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 03:41 PM
8

Exactly! The problem is when they begin to get both a large percentage of female voters as well as some men to believe this nonsensical shit. Then we have a serious problem. We've already seen the detriment of what the feminist agenda can do to a man in the form of the family court system, as well as how dismissive they can be of a man's life as opposed to a woman's life (i.e. The male disposability military draft). Once something becomes LAW, things get scary. These kinds of feminists are liter…
/r/MensRights13/09/15 03:38 PM
4

I like how they don't clarify if it's the hate speech by the feminist recommending that we put men into camps or if it's hate speech because the OP is daring to call out that feminist on openly advocating concentration camps for innocent people. Welcome to the new reddit and the skewing of definitions.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 03:34 PM
3

Man....I really liked Helen Mirren's work.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 03:31 PM
4

For the life of my I don't understand why a medical association has to kowtow to a religious group.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 03:30 PM
–

Physicians associations are the worst with this stuff. I'm always surprised how much stock they're willing to put into studies done in sub-saharan Africa where the population has completely different standards of personal hygiene. Either way, they don't even seem to approach the moral problem with cutting off a piece of a human's body without getting consent. Even if there were a higher incidence of penile cancer or UTI's, it still doesn't justify the practice. Some women who carry a specific ge…
/r/MensRights13/09/15 03:29 PM
6

Because they care about women's health.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 03:25 PM
5

.....and we should just take your word for that?
/r/MensRights13/09/15 11:50 AM
3

As another redditor said, those kinds of surveys are not sound science. Research methodology runs from anecdotal to double blind placebo controlled meta analysis. The research you posted is closer to anecdote. They can give a general idea and add reason for further research but they are certainly not conclusive.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 11:49 AM
2

Meanwhile all of this is beside the point. You're entire purpose of coming into this thread was to derail it as some sort of brainwashing. You completely refuse to acknowledge the arguments being made and dismiss them as unimportant to the greater problem, what you really want to talk about, which is female rape. Well, this isn't a discussion about female rape. It's a discussion about how men who are completely innocent are being impacted by the hyper-zealous "rape culture" label. Maybe keep it …
/r/MensRights13/09/15 03:32 AM
2

The government also actively legislates on the pay gap myth. The source of research doesn't change the fact that the research methodology is poor.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 03:27 AM
2

The argument isn't bias or anything else having to do with the controversy. The argument is simply that this sort of study is notoriously unreliable. It doesn't get any more complicated than that.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 03:24 AM
5

You're not even posting legitimate research to back up your points and clearly you're angry, so how are you any different than the people who would watch a pro-feminist youtube video and get all up in arms about those evil MRA's?
/r/MensRights13/09/15 02:41 AM
5

Wait...no. You're the one that provided research that was collected based on a method that's known to be shoddy and unreliable...don't make excuses for it.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 02:39 AM
11

This is already what's happening at universities. Guilty until proven innocent.
/r/TheRedPill12/09/15 10:50 PM
2

You will notice that not a single person (especially the known SRSers, SJW's, and feminists) will actually attack TRP on even ground. In every single case it's either a simple attack like "The sleezebags at TRP...(insert bullshit here)" with absolutely no reasoning behind it other than them having an opinion, OR they build up a strawman that represents what they THINK redpill is based on 5 minutes of reading comments then attack that strawman. Rinse and repeat...all over Reddit. Now, I'm not say…
/r/TheRedPill11/09/15 08:07 PM
2

It's a tough place to be in intellectually. Feminists have a tremendous amount of influence and they're basically making up this entire narrative as they go along. What's always amazing to me is how little modern feminist ideas are actually based on sound science and data. Even then, most of the data they use in their talking points has been completely debunked and the rest of what they say is based purely on emotion. These are the people we are letting determine the future of relationships, the…
/r/MensRights11/09/15 03:33 PM
12

The only plus side of this is that she won't reproduce and raise a child in the emotionally destructive environment she will likely create for that child.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/15 02:58 PM
3

Seriously. I can't imagine sitting down and having anything in common with such a brainwashed imbecile.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 12:25 AM
3

There's always the military! /s
/r/MensRights11/09/15 12:24 AM
3

Seriously, what do they think is going to happen when they fill young boys full of a bunch of bullshit about dating, women, and society that fails any test of evidence? When they reject it, they're all going to go redpill/fightclub. Bored men who can't get women isn't exactly a good thing for the culture.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 12:22 AM
5

Don't forget to save for his funeral after his disposable ass gets drafted and dies in war.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 12:17 AM
–

Yea, we won't be discriminating against ALL men, just the ones that lift weights and talk like California surfers.
/r/MensRights10/09/15 08:11 PM
5

Apparently, all the vocabulary in the world can't stop me from oppression you so I'll just be all of those things and tread on your dreams.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 04:03 PM
27

The idea that all white men today are responsible for all white men yesterday continues to entertain me.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 02:36 PM
35

I think you just need to keep your opinion to yourself and realize that it's better for us to punish your privileged children than make sure that actual truth and justice prevail. I'd hate for a guilty person to get off scot free so we'll be punishing everyone. Welcome to the new world.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 06:52 PM
–

That one is called libel. I hope she has rich parents.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 01:51 PM
1

As I understand it, the drug is only slightly more effective than placebo alone. Not worth the risk but whatever. As long as we don't offend the hyper-offended with legitimate health concerns.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 10:59 PM
2

I would question the validity of This woman's entire body of work based on that single quote. Definitions matter. What is this woman calling legitimate rape? One absolutely MUST be taking liberties with the definition of rape to come up with a figure that misleading.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 10:55 PM
3

This is a classic. A true representation of what SJW culture represents and how it actually feels about issues facing men and boys...particularly white men and boys. Make no mistake, these people are absolutely no different than the KKK or the Westboro Baptist Church. They're just fundamentalists of a different religion/ideology.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 10:50 PM
2

I keep wondering how long we are going to have to keep debunking the pay gap myth before they acknowledge that it doesn't exist.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 06:45 PM
1

Just a reminder, anytime custody or divorce comes up, the movie Divorce Corp needs to be mandatory viewing.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 06:44 PM
1

Well...her reputation is stellar now.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 05:22 PM
1

Ok, i see what you meant now. I'm still having a hard time understanding what the date the contract was signed compared to the date of the wedding has to do with any of this?.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 04:52 PM
1

I'm very tired of seeing stories like this. It's just not worth it any more for people. I happen to be married. I'm pretty good about game so I don't anticipate that's going to go south, but I just can't say the same for young men any more. For a long time I was pretty accepting of people who wanted to get married but, at this point, I just can't do it any more. I will now ACTIVELY discourage my friends and family from getting married. I won't do it at the dinner table but I'll find some way. I'…
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 03:54 PM
1

I don't see what the wedding date has to do with it at all.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 03:49 PM
1

I haven't seen any evidence that he said he would drop the prenup after kids. If I had to bet I'd say that she made that up and she's lying (which she has proven to do in the past). Also, a signed contract is a signed contract. There's no such thing as "duress' in the case of a wedding. Duress is if you hold a gun to someones head or threaten them with violence. Threatening to call off a wedding with a greedy whore (his instincts were right) is not duress, it's intelligent.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 03:48 PM
1

This is the issue. All of the fault here lies in the government enabling lying psychopaths. They're the ones that threw out a legal contract because she said it didn't count. They're the ones who give women money who earned nothing over half of everything. They're the ones who steal children away from their fathers. They're the ones who believe the word of the woman with no other evidence with regard to abuse. EVERYTHIGN we are seeing is a result of the government's actions. If they treated wome…
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 03:42 PM
1

What bothers me is the audacity of the judge to throw out the prenup based on nothing but someone's word. She marries into the money, destroys her family, destroys her cousins family, never produces a penny and still gets rewarded. Unbelievable. It's cases like this that the public needs to be aware of.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 03:34 PM
3

Jesus...what a fucking shit show. Part of me would just want to leave the country. Even if I had to live illegally and in poverty away from my kids...fuck that bitch.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 03:24 PM
2

Well it's a good thing a legal contract can be dismissed based on the word of a lying, cheating bitch with the mind of a child.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/15 03:22 PM
1

What about applying the ideas into action? Any good resources on that?
/r/askTRP09/08/15 11:56 PM
1

I sent him a bunch of articles from TheRationalMan.com and he lit up like a Christmas tree. He can't stop talking about it. So, just wondering, does the book "The Rational Male" have some of the application of these ideals. A lot of this stuff is brilliant in terms of diagnosing that, yes, we indeed have a problem, but what's a good source on solutions?
/r/askTRP09/08/15 11:56 PM
29

I remember this was one of my dads complaints. Where we lived it was unbelievably hot. He spent a lot of weekends doing yard work, fixing the house, and working outside on whatever needed to be done. Still not enough.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 01:01 AM
2

I'm kind of new here and you worded that in a way that was pretty intriguing. Could you go into more about what you mean by this: TRP owes its rep to the sentiment that the messenger almost always gets shot.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/15 11:40 PM
1

Didn't Pao just get added as a mod of some SJW subreddit?
/r/TheRedPill06/08/15 04:55 PM
3

I honestly am at the point now that I know the admins are, at the least, huge SJW sympathizers. I don't use reddit on my verified account any more because it could doxx me. I just don't trust them. There's nothing stopping an SJW admin from secretly sending an e-mail address to one of their fembot blogger friends with black horn rims and no soul who can dig up, publicize, and shame someones entire identity if they want.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/15 04:53 PM
11

The idea of an "Alt" is even changing now. The controversial subreddits that they quarantined demand an active personal e-mail address just to access them. Got that? They want to keep a standing log of all the personal e-mail addresses of people who look at controversial shit.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/15 04:44 PM
11

It's amazing how all the idiots just completely dismiss this place like the people here are some kind of pariah. As if improving yourself and increasing your value to the world is some kind of cult.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/15 04:39 PM
1

"Bought life insurance and forgot to update the will after the divorce." seems like a possibility.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 08:25 PM
14

They'll find the most extreme Redpiller and pretend they are the majority.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 08:21 PM
4

I really feel for this kid. If he stays on the registry his life is over. He won't even be able to leave the country because a nation where he might try to get a work visa will to a background check and see that he's been to jail and is on the sex offender registry. Every job application he every fills out and he will have to explain what happened, re-live it, and he'll never get the job over someone with a clean record.
/r/MensRights05/08/15 08:20 PM
7

Most SJW's don't worry that much about doxxing because they crave the attention and they use the negative public reaction as an excuse to become what they wish for most of all....being a victim. Just look at every SJW that's ever been attacked publicly for their absurd beliefs. The first thing they do is to establish themselves as damsels in distress, receiving death threats (that they never seem to provide any evidence of).
/r/MensRights05/08/15 08:07 PM
2

Fantastic study, and fantastic commentary. Thank you. All the more reason to be alpha, regardless of your relationship status.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/15 02:14 AM
19

If women were actually being paid $.77 for every dollar a man earns for the same work then EVERY COMPANY IN THE WORLD would only hire females because it would improve their bottom line. That doesn't happen. This leaves us with one of two possibilities: 1.) The Gender pay gap exists and women are so incompetent that companies are willing to pay men more to get the job done. 2.) The Gender pay gap does not exist and any discrepancy in pay is a result of the jobs women choose as oppose to the jobs …
/r/TheRedPill01/08/15 04:56 PM
4

The irony here is that the response "hahahahahahaha" to any argument is the most absurdly childish thing any "intellectual" can foist upon their readers. SRSr's and other SJW's do this shit all the time. It's a clever way of not having to confront the subject matter or add anything to the conversation YET sill manage to create an air of mocking superiority. Safe to simply say: Idiot: Please ignore
/r/MensRights27/07/15 02:48 PM
1

Best of luck, man. I'm sorry that we're not collectively strong enough to prevent this kind of shit yet. If there were one thing I wish for you it would be peace of mind. My father went through similar divorces and he basked himself in hatred of women for decades after. Don't be that. Just focus on yourself and your own happiness. On the other hand, what happened to you is wrong. It's wrong and the story should be told. I would really refine your story and save it so you can cut and paste it int…
/r/MensRights26/07/15 12:38 PM
2

That's pretty valuable advice I think but the reason I said what I said is because I don't feel most people are ready to hear it. The truth is there is no reason I can think of why marriage needs to be an institution. There's no reason to bring the state into your relationship. Simply and privately dedicating yourself to a monogamous relationship should be enough. No 25k ceremony, starting your relationship in debt, is required.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 12:33 PM
1

When you follow feminism down the rabbit hole far enough, you can almost always find some kind of Marxism. There's no other political ideology that could possible give them the kind of control they want over peoples mind's and bodies so those kinds of politics are a natural progression from feminism.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 10:27 PM
10

It's hard to read this. It seems pretty likely that, after three divorces, this woman was an old hat at taking advantage of the situation and manipulating the legal system. These are the kind of people the justice system SHOULD be protecting us against but it doesn't. In all honesty though, for those younger men out there reading this, the part of this story you need to be paying attention to is the fact that this was this woman's 4TH DIVORCE. If a woman has a single divorce under her belt, ther…
/r/MensRights25/07/15 10:21 PM
6

That's actually a very good way to put it. That would have made a much better article than the feminist drivel I just read.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 09:39 PM
6

That's like feeding rats to get rid of them.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 09:29 PM
15

That's a perfectly legitimate question when you follow the logic down the path that she's trying to lead her readers.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 09:29 PM
3

That was my first thought when reading. There's absolute no way this article isn't anything but a hypothetical projection.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 09:26 PM
13

First of all, this is a question of value. We have here a person who believes that her time and emotional states are worth money. I'm perfectly willing to play this game but if we're going to play it, we're going to do it honestly and not analyze it through the inevitably self serving glasses of a feminist. I’ve actually been on agony aunt duty for male friends since high school, so if it’s true that it takes 10,000 hours of practice to become an expert at something, counseling bereft dudes may …
/r/MensRights23/07/15 09:16 PM
10

Every action produces an equal but opposite reaction. TRP and MGTOW are natural reactions to a growing inequality. No matter how much feminists hate them, they need only look into a mirror if they want to truly understand what CAUSED them.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 01:54 AM
9

It just so happens, though, that when a woman fucks around on her husband and gets pregnant the "social role" is defined as the cuckholded husbands finances.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 01:51 AM
21

Online feminists apparently don't care who the father is. They just think that whatever man is closest to them at the time of birth owes them thousands to support the child. That's not a joke either, I've actually seen them mock fathers who are not actually fathers and don't want anything to do with or support a child who isn't theirs.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 11:42 PM
1

TRP would have a field day with this shit.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 11:41 PM
3

Nobody on that end of the debate is allowed to look up at the mountain of shit, that decades of horrifying family court law, has created. That would just be too reasonable.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 02:02 PM
3

I really hope Canada has some kind of punitive mechanism in place for ruining a mans life because he hurt their feelings. I suppose what upsets me more is that the Canadian legal system didn't throw this out the second it was filed.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 01:34 PM
1

Jesus fucking christ this woman needs to be institutionalized.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 01:26 PM
1

Careful. You might rustle somebody's jimmies and end up in jail for saying that.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 03:53 AM
6

I get that. It's hard not to feel angry at shit like this, though.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 03:52 AM
9

That's what all these SJW's argue. Feeligs over facts. It's dangerous. Truly dangerous and quite scary that this idea actually seems to be gaining traction in our culture. There are a lot of things going on today that could snowball into disaster for all of us. Student debt crisis, money in politics, you name it...but this is one of those cancerous ideas lying just under the surface that can metastasize into problems we can't even begin to fathom.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 03:51 AM
15

I'm shocked it has gone this far. It should have been laughed out of the room the second it was filed.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 03:37 AM
7

Wow...just reading into this case...this is absolutely unbelievable. I'm just sitting here confused as to how this vicious woman has made it this far. Even without a guilty verdict, she has effectively destroyed this mans life. I find myself hoping for the online backlash worse than the one that that came at Adria Richards when she destroyed a mans life because she eavesdropped and overheard him tell a joke that offended her. However, I'm struggling the most to understand how a respectable natio…
/r/MensRights16/07/15 03:36 AM
3

Could you link that?
/r/MensRights16/07/15 03:21 AM
29

Jesus, I hate to stereotype but why is it that every feminist looks and speaks in such a way that is instantly disgusting to me? Also, those specific glasses...they all seem to have them.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 03:21 AM
6

Fuck a settlement. Go for gold. Columbia had every opportunity to put an end to this shit.
/r/MensRights16/07/15 03:16 AM
5

...and fucking feminists mock MRA's like we have nothing to be complaining about. This is an abortion of justice and it's a perfect example of how the man is constantly seen as the criminal. Two drunk people fuck....the man is OBVIOUSLY the rapist! Two young kids have sex? The boy needs to go on the sex offender registry! PERFECT SENSE.
/r/PussyPass18/02/15 11:55 AM
3

You have the right to be the most disposable yet privileged member of society. Anything you say can and will be used against you, shitlord.
/r/MensRights24/12/14 06:29 AM
1

Only irrationality could be upset by this justice.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 10:31 AM
1

Only if you make the character walk into a strip club then abuse the women. Like Sarkslezian did in her video to prove her point that the game promoted violence against women. Of course, you can do the same thing to any character in the game but that didn't fit her perverted narrative.
/r/MensRights11/12/14 10:28 AM
12

Again, I never addressed the video. You're just picking a fight. Maybe your time would be better spent elsewhere.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/14 12:30 PM
11

I didn't say it wasn't an over reaction. I didn't really discuss much of the context of the video at all. I discussed the white knight phenomenon.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/14 12:13 PM
26

White knights are so predictable...it's like knowing the sun is going to rise. You wouldn't even need to see the rest of the video to know that some dude is going to try to retaliate to save the damsel.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/11/14 11:57 AM
8

I have video of the assault but I was bullied out of calling the cops. The girls claimed that they were going to tell the cops I hit them. Male privilege is to be afraid of false assault allegation to the point that you can't report a crime.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 02:00 AM
42

Something that seems consistent a lot of these videos is how much the onlookers and sometimes even the attackers seem to think that attacking a guy is funny. Then when the guy defends himself, there's an immediate silence followed by the White Knight intervention and calls of "HOW DARE YOU?" It's the same shit over and over again. The irony here is fucking palpable. Not wanting men to be abusers is one thing. Telling men not to hit women, when it's clearly acceptabe and funny to others when wome…
/r/PussyPassDenied12/11/14 11:04 AM
1

I like that idea. Helps to bridge the gap for reasonable people on either side.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 10:15 PM
5

Thats when you file a lawsuit so massive it would close the school.
/r/MensRights20/04/14 08:59 PM
1

Who decides these definitions and what is their evidence besides cult literature?
/r/MensRights19/02/14 11:11 AM
2

How about you raise any child with both male and female influence? Mostly because women aren't the only gender that matter in the world. There's another half that might have something to say.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 03:07 AM
24

I'd check straight out of the country on that one.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 06:27 AM
5

I'm going to guess that the fourth wave are the SRS and Jezabel types that seem to be so proliferate these days.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 06:26 AM
3

That ass grab can, apparently ruin someone's live. All the more reason to make sure the person who drunkenly grabs the ass has their life ruined too, amirite?
/r/MensRights23/01/14 05:43 AM
3

Well, I figure....surely they will be sensitive to the people (mostly men) who have had their entire lives and educations ruined at the expense of someone making shit up to protect their good name. SURELY This happened to a close friend of mine in college and it has never left me. It's the strongest reason I'm an activist. How one person's lie can destroy someone else's life with nothing more than words shouldn't be legal.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 02:41 AM
10

A person is only responsible for a crime if they commit the crime.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 07:26 AM
2

No surprise. Feminists seem extraordinarily well versed in their arguments on how feminism helps men, but the reality is what it has always been. Feminism doesn't give a fuck about men until every last women has their preferences satisfied.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 07:22 AM
6

What's sad is that he was living on the street because he was schizophrenic. Good thing we don't need mens health centers for people like this, right?
/r/MensRights09/12/13 01:01 AM
12

...but is assaulting people and spray painting private property the best way to get that point across?
/r/MensRights04/12/13 12:53 AM
4

You mean the people who's personal belief structure is fully, and sometimes violently opposed to the idea of egalitarianism espoused in the MRM thinks the MRM is a hate group? Say it aint so.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 12:52 AM
2

I sometimes wonder if Ann Coulter isn't pulling off one of the biggest trolls of all time.
/r/MensRights23/10/13 05:56 AM
3

I this case "grass" is analogous to "Real DollTM".
/r/MensRights21/10/13 01:51 AM
1

Good start.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 01:50 AM
1

Time to get a visitor visa to Australia and forget to get on your return flight.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 08:29 PM
8

Nice to know SRS has infected /r/bestof. It's ironic how such "oppressed" people can gain so much power.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 02:00 AM
3

I ain't sayin' she's a gold digger, but she ain't.......
/r/MensRights15/07/13 11:20 PM
2

The phrase "rape culture" means different things to different types of feminists. In many cases, the phrase is used as sort of a buzzword, or a place for feminists to direct their anger. "I don't like this behavior, must be this overreaching "rape culture" resulting from "The Patriarchy". Let's take conspiracy theory and apply the same type of reasoning: I don't like this behavior, must be Rothschild Zionism as a result of the Illuminati. Now, the reason that sounds strange is because neither of…
/r/MensRights15/07/13 09:31 PM
1

I'm quite curious about what your thoughts are on this as I am not that well versed in this particular topic. I hate the way words like "Toxic Masculinity" and "Rape Culture" seem to be used by extremists to denigrate men, but as to the premise of this trailer I found myself, in a way, nodding in agreement. Even considering that it has some speakers in it that might not be kosher, is it possible that this kind of film might be on to something or do you think it is barking up the wrong tree entir…
/r/MensRights15/07/13 09:39 AM
7

I have never heard toxic masculinity used in a way other than to denigrate males This is the exact same problem I have with it. I actually find it quite refreshing that we finally see feminists actually attempting to take a crack at mens issues like this. I do question the use of words like "toxis masculinity" "Rape culture" and "Patriarchy". They seem to create imaginary boogymen where none are required. We have a behavior problem. This problem is rooted in the way we raise children. We need to…
/r/MensRights15/07/13 09:25 AM
10

Very good point. Also worth noting is the question of the population of innocent men VS rapist numbers....that is actual, real rape, not absurd SRS "He looked at me creepy." rape. What percentage of men actually take advantage of women in these situations? I don't know what the number is, but it's probably safe to say that it is a small minority. Yet feminists feel these posters, which insinuate that ALL men should be watched carefully, are perfectly reasonable. The bottom line is, these posters…
/r/MensRights14/07/13 06:45 AM
2

I think this would be grounds to check out of the country.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 06:34 AM
6

This exact same argument can be used for the original posters. Rape happens, posters are not the appropriate vehicle to talk about them. The double standard and hypocrisy here are palpable. It's so glaring. I just can't imagine how they don't see it.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 11:42 PM
1

It is difficult for me as a woman, as a democrat, and as a liberal, to go against NOW, but in this case, they are wrong, This sentence should have ended: ...because the only thing I'm using to qualify this statement is bias drivel based on falsehood.
/r/MensRights12/07/13 12:32 AM
8

You'd think in this "patriarchy" we live in and all this "rape culture" going around, men could just squash this whole anti-rape campaign under our boot. Trouble is, anytime anything like this is done that even slightly deviates from feminist talking points (i.e. "All men need to be told not to rape."), we get talks of a lawsuit, called every despicable name in the book, and the media shits a chicken. Gotta love how blind these people are.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 09:23 PM
46

If they don't want people mocking them then they shouldn't be putting up posters insinuating that all men are looking for an opportunity to rape people.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 10:27 AM
3

"The next big score."
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:56 AM
2

Women in the US have absolutely no one to thank but themselves for the care, established men are forced to take, before they get married. If a woman truly loves and wants to get married to a man who is already established, then the first thing she should do is go out and get a prenup that protects HIM in case of a future split. That's how you show a man, who has absolutely every right to be cautious these days, you are committed to them and not their money. If you make your boyfriend bring up a …
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:52 AM
-1

Remember Shitlords, false accusations don't real. Women are always the victims.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 07:49 AM
1

The husbands take on the situation should even be considered. This woman should be locked away for 30 years.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 01:58 AM
–

No one, men included, should have this kind of unchecked power. She could have ruined your career if you and her were the only people in the hallway.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 01:47 AM
6

Having the time you spend with your children dominated by someone who has textbook narcissism is not a good place to be either. She will use the children as weapons against him and the law is currently almost powerless to stop this.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 12:47 AM
1

Those games "objectify" men the same way they do women. Most of the male characters didn't have a shirt on and every single one of those characters were unrealistically cut. But the skimpy outfits and the big tits on the women characters somehow represent a hatred for women? That's some of the dumbest logic I've ever heard.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 08:23 AM
35

Not having a choice then having the threat of force, kidnapping (jail), and financial ruin used against you is the definition of coercion and a violation of civil rights.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 01:58 AM
63

I know it's sarcasm, but this is what they actually believe with a whole heart.
/r/MensRights02/07/13 01:55 AM
2

On a Via rail train and noticed that there are two bathrooms, one female only, and one unisex. Why? Because men aren't people, silly. /s
/r/MensRights01/07/13 01:27 AM
25

And they breathe heavy. How dare they breathe.
/r/MensRights01/07/13 01:21 AM
21

Pedohysteria and fear about "Rape Culture" is at a level that is completely unsustainable if our culture is going to be healthy. It's just not possible or reasonable for people to keep pretending that pedophiles and rapists are around every corner. At some point we're going to have to stop forcing these people (pedos/rapists) underground so they can feel comfortable enough to come forward with their problems and it can be treated before someone gets hurt. This can't happen if every "Regular Joe"…
/r/MensRights30/06/13 11:48 PM
1

Children need fathers. I shutter to think what research is going to say about the generation being raised today without a father figure because their ex-wife knows how to game the system. I'm betting we are going to see all sorts of addiction problems, ADHD, ODD, and a myiad of other psychological issues all stemming from the fact that children are being raised without enough paternal imput.
/r/MensRights30/06/13 01:37 AM
2

I can see your reasoning. Interesting. I will ponder. Thanks for the answer.
/r/MensRights29/06/13 07:11 AM
1

Why do you support their rights when they don't give a fuck about yours? Why do you frame the question this way? The answer is because I don't have the right to tell them what to do. Nor do they have that right to tell me what to do. That's why MRM exists. It still makes me curios though, are you simply against abortion to get even with women? Stop being reflexively pro-choice. I wouldn't exactly call it a reflex.... but why?
/r/MensRights29/06/13 06:10 AM
5

Going to go through your post and write thoughts. Read or not, up to you. CIS male Red flag. "Cis" is not a real word except in the chemistry world. It's the radical feminist word for "typical" and it is commonly used in a derogatory way towards the typical person. happy and content with the current treatment towards women I'm going to go out on a limb and say that these "friends "couldn't articulate what "treatment toward women" they were upset about. It sounds like more of a dismissive argumen…
/r/MensRights28/06/13 09:12 PM
2

This is the problem, if the"best interest of the child" is the reason this whole fiasco has taken place then perhaps leaving the child in the custody of a rapist isn't the best course of action.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 08:18 PM
17

It takes an incredible amount of ignorance to make that statement.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 08:17 PM
16

I was told by my feminist overlords at SRS that this didn't happen, ever, ever and that all MRA's who think it does happen are irrational shitlords. Oh It did happen....must have been patriarchy. Still men's fault. /s
/r/MensRights28/06/13 07:32 AM
3

The humor and mockery are standard operating defense mechanisms when dealing with someones beliefs. They are the one with the problem, not you. To them, they are perfectly content believing that "dads are bumbling idiots" because to maintain that belief (and thus, refusing to analyze one's thoughts for fear of them being incorrect) is the easy road. You've encountered a denial machine. The best thing to do when you find those is to understand that they can't be helped until they decide to analyz…
/r/MensRights28/06/13 01:56 AM
1

No. Title IX is a fucking scam.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 01:48 AM
2

But....what could possibly have given them that impression?
/r/MensRights28/06/13 01:46 AM
3

Since my arrest my life has changed considerably as a direct result. The is a stigma attached to people alleged to have committed these offences. It may be years before I can remove that stigma.'" I watched a good friend in college have his entire reputation and future destroyed by this very thing. It's not the accusation and eventual finding of innocence that is necessarily the worst....it's the stigma by the community and family that lingers for years or sometimes for the rest of their life. I…
/r/MensRights28/06/13 01:45 AM
1

The only reason gender roles are even still around today in general society is that feminism constantly proclaims that it fights them The more I read from feminists the more I think they just really like patting themselves on the back for shit they are supposed to be doing. Nothing actually gets done, but anyone who points that out is just a cog in the gears of The Patriarchy<sup>TM.</sup>
/r/MensRights26/06/13 11:43 PM
1

This is really important. If you have nothing else on your side, you need to make sure you daughter, at least, has access to the calm, pure, and simple truth. If the worst happens and your ex turns her against you, then the best move you can make is to simply be as low pressure as possible. If you daughter is like many other children, when she becomes a fully functioning adult, she will eventually see through your ex-wife's manipulation and begin to open up communication. I wish we didn't live i…
/r/MensRights26/06/13 04:21 AM
11

When stories like [This](www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1h1dsg/i_dont_know_where_else_to_turn/) are commonplace in the culture, it starts becoming pretty obvious why men don't want to get married or have children.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 04:16 AM
2

This fucking system has to change. This is just horrifying. An entire generation of children are being stolen form their fathers.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 04:10 AM
4

They really need to get over this idea that men have some global, Illuminati like organization deigned to keep a boot on the throat of women. This whole idea of "oppressor" is so wildly overblown, it's difficult to even discuss the topic rationally once the word "oppression" is dropped. It's just fucking silly. If people would just recognize the purpose of their view (i.e. equality), as opposed to constantly finding a way to paint themselves out to be "THE VICTIM" this would be much easier.
/r/MensRights23/06/13 11:56 PM
4

This is so, incredibly sad. It's like this all over the world in countries like Australia, the US, and the UK. It's so terrible that so many feminists think we are just a bunch of mindless, angry men who just want to "keep their boot on the throat of women." This is an entire generation of children being ripped away from loving fathers because of lies. There are just no words to describe this. No one should have this kind of power over peoples lives. I feel like there really isn't anything we ca…
/r/MensRights21/06/13 09:04 AM
6

Anytime this term has ever been used against me it's just been a way for rad-fems to shut down a conversation they don't like. It's a showy, arrogant way for them to dismiss debates without actually needing to present anything logical or meaningful to the conversation. Also, it's obviously sexist.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 10:14 PM
4

I was to understand that feminism had this problem locked down so we really shouldn't talk about it.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 07:12 AM
4

I just got into a huge "discussion" with a maniacal SRS type over in /r/texas. And by "discussion" I mean, I presented evidence and she called me every name in the book. Here's the deal with the pay gap, lots and lots of people (specifically feminists) love the idea of the pay gap theory. The thing is, the research on the pay gap neglects some very obvious variables and thus, the conclusions and reliability of the theory is highly questionable at best. At worst it's a total myth. Here are some l…
/r/MensRights19/06/13 12:49 AM
3

Don't wine and victimize yourself when someone gets angry with you for being oppressive. The way these people use the word "oppressive" is more tactical than anything else. The goal of these types of people, when they debate, is not to promote a message or create equality or anything like that. What they are doing is trying their damnedest to make themselves the damsel in distress. It's the Victimhood Olympics and they're racing to the bottom of the pile. They WANT to be victims because that's w…
/r/MensRights19/06/13 12:10 AM
4

This man writes for a living? That was almost unintelligable. I've seen better writing from SRS.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 09:29 PM
4

Good on you. When my wife and I first got married we both worked, but since we had children we decided her staying at home with the kids and homeschooling was a good choice. Best decision we ever made. It's all up to the individual and their financial circumstances, but it's awesome that people have a choice now.
/r/MensRights18/06/13 02:58 AM
2

I like how early in the text she go's on to say women want to have sex cause its fun and then blames men for getting them pregnant. Typical rad-fem perspective: Women bear no responsibility in any situation, under any circumstances. If in doubt, the woman is always the victim. I think men and women should be completely equal but this makes me want to punch the motherfucker. Yes, this induces feelings in me well beyond rage. No part of this woman wants equality of the sexes. No part of this entir…
/r/MensRights17/06/13 07:01 AM
15

This is too much. Articles like these.....feminists like this.....just fuck. I don't even know where to start with this rabid bullshit. Father's Day is the annual celebration of men's fertility. It is not a celebration of "good fathers" but, rather, any man who contributes sperm to create a child. ....and Mother's day is the annual celebration of squirting out a fuck trophy (or meal ticket). Wow, it sure is easy to be this cynical. We are in the midst of a crisis in masculinity where male violen…
/r/MensRights16/06/13 10:42 PM
3

The number of feminists denying that this is an epidemic, is to damn high. Seriously, there needs to be some serious research into women that claim abuse just go get preferential treatment in a courtroom.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 04:59 AM
4

The feminists apologists are all over this one. I love to see them give lip service to anyone expressing doubts in feminism's all encompassing power, but when the time comes to actually do something about men's issues you will never see a group give less of a fuck than feminists. In fact, for some reason, they seem to enjoy protesting and cursing anytime someone besides a feminist speaks about mens' issues. Strange.
/r/MensRights16/06/13 04:56 AM
3

I think what we really need is to put the NSA spying program to work. What we do is we get a comprehensive list of people who are not sitting on their couch watching the WNBA games and we get the NCAA to over to their house and we tie them to a chair. Then we threaten their children and tell them, if you untie mommie/daddy before the game is over, we will drone strike your house. That's what it would take for me to watch a WNBA game, anyway. Problem solved. You're welcome equality.
/r/MensRights12/06/13 02:11 AM
2

It depends entirely on the feelings of the feminist you are having the discussion with.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 04:13 AM
47

No, you can't. Only my house matters. The fire on your house will magically go out as soon as we put the fire out in mine.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 09:55 PM
13

Except, there's one problem. I'll explain using his "Neighbor's house is on fire" analogy. If your neighbors house is on fire (i.e. women are being raped at an alarming rate.) You should give him the hose as opposed to telling him "some people die from drowning (male rape) too." The thing is, modern feminism doesn't just want the hose for the burning house, they want to flood all the nearby houses too. Got a gas stove?....Your house is getting flooded. Lighting a cigarette? Your house is getting…
/r/MensRights09/06/13 09:53 PM
8

I like how skeptics and atheists have been around for quite some time now, but as soon as feminists get involved they go into it like the Navy Seals clearing a room. "Ain't gon be no sexist shit here, this is OUR movement now!"
/r/MensRights06/06/13 08:50 AM
1

"equality" is feminism's cloaking device and their payload is bigotry. I feel I need to embroider that on a throw pillow.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 09:37 PM
19

Don't you just love how they can weasel themselves into the victim in any situation?
/r/MensRights24/05/13 07:56 AM
5

"The Patriarchy" is a ghost meant to create artificial victims for the sake of rad-fem political advancement.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 12:57 AM
10

Welcome to the Women's Studies program at Brown University, your first class will be Projection 101.
/r/MensRights06/05/13 12:02 AM
11

How any of them can still try to claim the territory of egalitarian is beyond me. Sure they can blame the imaginary ghost of "Patriarchy" for everything, but that will only get you somewhere until you realize that The Patriarchy isn't real.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 11:57 PM
-2

Actions have consequences. Sometimes the consequences are good, and sometimes the consequences are bad.
/r/MensRights05/05/13 11:55 PM
18

Oh that......uhh.....that's PATRICHARCHY<sup>TM!</sup> /s
/r/MensRights02/05/13 01:06 AM
5

I'm the lord over my shit, I own them, and I say who stays and who goes......because I am a privileged shitlord. /check
/r/MensRights02/05/13 01:03 AM
10

When the government is coming after you with guns (sending police), to kidnap you and hold you (jail), because you refuse to pay massive portions of your labor for a child you did not father and is, in no way, your responsibility.....it's time to go off the grid. They system has failed you and you owe it nothing.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 05:00 AM
2

I agree it's good to keep the term "rape" reserved for, well, rape. No need to fall into the trap feminists did by starting to label everything they don't like as "rape". I think, though, that this should fall into the category of some type of sexual assault as opposed to your average theft.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 12:43 AM
12

That's true. If you could just "Shut the fuck up" and "Get out of the way" then feminism could do their job by slaying the patriarchy. Everything will be fine. I promise.
/r/MensRights01/05/13 12:36 AM
2

Many of the tenants of feminist dogma are based around an unprovable ideological rhetoric (i.e Rape culture, Patriarchy, and toxic masculinity). So, it is no surprise that these ideological strongholds often lead to anti-science attitudes.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 07:20 AM
1

Let it happen. Don't be like the radfems pulling fire alarms and ripping down flyers. Ask hard questions. Bring research. Bring reality.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 02:23 AM
10

That old man attacking him like that.....That shit's not right. You don't just revert back to your Navy days when someone runs their mouth, just get security, fuckstick. This isn't Pappys Tavern.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 02:16 AM
1

I have to be honest here, these women are fucking unspooled. HOWEVER, that does not justify the threats and abuse they get when a video or controversy goes public (i.e. Adria Richards, and Big Read here). Controversy, yes. Opinions, yes. Death threats, no. Rape threats, no. Meeting this kind of extremism with more extremism is not how you change the world.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 02:11 AM
10

Everything went well until the mid-seventies when NOW came out against the presumption of joint custody [of children following divorces]. "I couldn't believe the people I thought were pioneers in equality were saying that women should have the first option to have children or not to have children--that children should not have equal rights to their dad.[12]" This statement is a very large reason I am involved in MRA's. Who, in their right mind, would fight against joint custody? Children need fa…
/r/MensRights21/04/13 11:49 PM
2

Lots and lots and lots of murders and rapists were abused as children. It's likely the reason they are fucked up....but we still lock them up and throw away the key. This does not excuse their crime. This woman chopped off a mans dick and she knew it was wrong. Period.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 09:30 AM
2

Unreal. Just fucking absurd. Pure brainwashing with crazy being drip fed for her entire educational career.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 09:23 AM
1

Get of Reddit, and go talk to a lawyer that is recommended by someone you trust. Because of the evidence you have you can make many statements and have all of your ducks in a row before you wife knows anything. Be smart for the sake of your children. You DO NOT want your kids growing up in an abusive environment, so you have to do everything in your power to keep them away from her.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 02:03 AM
15

Ahhhhaaa, BUT, those women wouldn't kill their children if it wasn't for The Patriarchy<sup>TM.</sup> GOTCHA. Note: Yes, sarcasm.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 12:32 PM
22

I donate to MRA's and I am active in them because of you and those with similar stories. Thank you for sharing.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 12:30 PM
1

Wow. I'm going to need to read that three times. Do you do this for a living? Is this GWW's alt I'm talking to? ;)
/r/MensRights15/04/13 06:40 AM
0

That was a great answer. Thank you for being thorough. So, disposability is demonstrable and ubiquitous while the feminist buzzwords are more made up. Is that a safe deduction?
/r/MensRights15/04/13 05:19 AM
3

Well, at a net worth that probably sits in the negatives at this point I think it's probably safe to say that the school district is wasting their money....again.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 05:10 AM
1

The video does not exist. "Removed by the user" apparently.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 04:13 AM
2

That was everything I hoped it would be.
/r/MensRights14/04/13 11:04 PM
1

Yea. I run into that whole "You're doing that too much, try again in 9 minutes." all the time because SRS doesn't like me, so I know how it is. Either way, I think it's important to note that it is much more likely for a woman to file abuse than a man. That said, you are still correct, a man can also file a report on a woman and have her removed from her own home with no evidence. That is wrong too. The burden of proof can't possibly be met by the accusation of a single person who benefits heavi…
/r/MensRights13/04/13 08:40 AM
2

Men are far more likely to be accused of abuse. I think the point however, is not in who is making the accusation but that the accusation ALONE is enough to remove a person from their own home without due process of law.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 04:49 AM
5

Either the poster I'm replying to is an SRSer trying to make MRA's look like shit or they are an unspooled wingnut I don't really want associated with /r/mensrights. Either way, worthy of a downvote if you have one to spare.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 04:47 AM
1

Could you clarify that?
/r/MensRights13/04/13 04:45 AM
2

I can't see anyone trying to take advantage of this. /s
/r/MensRights13/04/13 04:44 AM
5

The level of denial in feminist havens concerning how much this occurs is just absurd. For every woman that actually calls the police and reports this, there are probably 10 that threaten to do it. This is a thing because it gives them POWER at no cost. Under the right conditions, they can make up anything they want around a bruise they got playing softball, and can send a man to prison. It's not the accusation that's the problem, its the way the system treats it that is the problem. I can't go …
/r/MensRights13/04/13 04:41 AM
8

Is there anyone who defends alimony here? It seems like the biggest scam in history. I get child support. I don't agree with much of the way custody and child support is managed, but I get it. Alimony...not so much. What keeps a fully functioning (and equal I might add) adult from getting a goddamn job? Lack of experience, maybe? I still fail to understand why that is the responsibility of the ex-husband for the rest of his days as long as the woman remains single.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 04:25 AM
2

Why do they need made up terms for everything? Toxic Masculinity, patriarchy, rape culture, etc. Why can't they just look at a demonstrable behavior and say "This needs to change because it affects the culture negatively, in this DEMONSTRABLE way." Why do we need all the ideological buzz words to beat men over the head with?
/r/MensRights10/04/13 10:01 PM
-1

They just make this shit up as they go along.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 08:46 PM
1

You realize that a public trial is guaranteed by the constitution right? I don't think anybody is saying the constitution should be ignored here, were noting a complication in the system that needs to be fixed. Not many crimes I can think of can destroy a potentially innocent persons life as quickly as a rape accusation. I can think of no other crime where the accused, who has no celebrity status of any kind, gets their picture plastered all over a national news site for simply being accused. Ca…
/r/MensRights10/04/13 06:18 AM
1

And look at the fucking picture Fox chose to post in the headline. They make him look like an animal. Media did the same type of shit in the Treyvon Martin / George Zimmermann case
/r/MensRights10/04/13 05:59 AM
1

Unreal. Guilty or not, this is despicable. What is is about rape accusations that make them the only potential crime to completely destroy someones life before they are even tried?
/r/MensRights10/04/13 05:57 AM
2

Ok, seriously, I don't want this link lost into the depths of /new. This is a really big step forward and it's making its way all over Facebook. Please make this visible.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 12:23 AM
3

No kids? You're being scammed by a legal system that threw you under the bus 4 years and 6 months ago, and a woman who is simply taking advantage of that system that gives her favor. (http://www.immi.gov.au/) Seriously. You only love once. There's no reason to waste the prime of your life like this.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 11:13 PM
8

You know who else gets blamed as a whole? The Jew. /s
/r/MensRights08/04/13 11:07 PM
4

LOL. Yea I've taken a few tours through there. Those guys are....different.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 12:10 PM
3

Seems like a vicious cycle. The only people who care enough about "Feminism" to keep turning over material people will read are the ones who are the most passionate, and thus the most extreme and ideological.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 02:18 AM
5

It's like the problems men face are not worthy of having events, so they protest any events because "Feminism got this, SHUT THE FUCK UP!" Well, obviously they don't got shit if men have to organize their own events and form their own associations to get information and make changes.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 02:11 AM
5

This is in India, but it doesn't make it less fucked up. Manoj Rathi, who earns Rs 2,000 a month, was asked by Judge Vineeta Goyal to give his wife Rs 1,200 for the maintenance of their child after divorce on July 11. Lol...asked. The same way the US Government "asks" me to pay taxes at the point of a gun. "Hey friend, just put the money in the bag and I won't have this guy in a blue costume throw you in a cage. Oh, and thanks" Ironically, the wife, Nalini, earns Rs 9,000 per month, which is alm…
/r/MensRights07/04/13 09:33 PM
8

It's fascinating how much denial floats around that place.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 11:55 AM
3

...and it's one, two, three strokes your out at the old.....I'm not finishing that one.
/r/MensRights07/04/13 11:53 AM
11

That .gif made me swallow my tongue.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 09:17 PM
9

Wow. Well done. I really don't get why the concept of misandry is so crazy. If someone hates women as a group it's misogyny. If they hate men as a group, it's misandry. It's not that hard. Denying that misandry is a word makes them look unspooled. And by my calculation, internet feminists don't need more things to make them look crazy.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 09:13 PM
7

I hope he doesn't back down from this. He's a specialist in fighting and what he says is way more important and valid than anyone claiming that their feelings are more valid than expert opinion.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 04:30 AM
5

Aside from this whole transsexual issue, I've been watching Joe Rogan's stand up for a long time. He's a feminist target if I've ever seen one.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 04:25 AM
10

No, I don't. That's kinda fucked up. I was actually paraphrasing a quote from Hillary Clinton where she said the something along the lines of women being the primary sufferers in war.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 09:16 AM
21

Why should we burden women with war? We all know they already carry most of the burden of war already. /s
/r/MensRights05/04/13 02:06 AM
2

Must be THE PATRIARCHY'S<sup>TM</sup> fault. Edit: It is, indeed, sarcasm.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 11:57 PM
3

This is the first time I had heard of this case. God damn. So awesome he got his life back.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 11:40 PM
3

I was hoping one of them would be the Farrell protest. Good on you.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 04:15 AM
1

Wow. Interesting.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 04:13 AM
1

Well done.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 04:10 AM
2

What a bunch of unprovable nonsense. Anything other than just these people's anecdotal bullshit to confirm this phenomenon of men acting like their problems are more important than women's? I'll go ahead and answer that: NO. there is no legitimate evidence anywhere which supports this notion. It is purely fueled by hate and misandry.... which, apparently, are words that don't count for you if you are a radical feminist.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 01:54 AM
1

It gets really old hearing these vaccine conversations always devolve into playmate bashing. I honestly don't see this kind of thing making anybody wake up and say "Yea, maybe I was wrong about vaccines." Surely there's a better way to go about educating on vaccines. Speaking of which, that website they made about her (Jennymccarthybodycount.com) is not scientific at all. There is no evidence demonstrating that the kids who died from vaccine preventable diseases, died as a result of the anti-vac…
/r/MensRights31/03/13 12:40 AM
1

You should let your kids choose.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 12:39 AM
5

He's wrong. He's a doctor, and he's misrepresenting the evidence. There is not a significant health difference that has been demonstrated in first world nations which have reasonable standards of hygiene.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 12:38 AM
3

The studies were done in sub-Saharan Africa where the standards of hygene are terrible. If you have good hygene, your risk factors may as well drop to zero.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 12:36 AM
9

This is the problem with MRA's not being political enough. Feminism has a huge head start. The only thing that swings ridiculous laws like this is money and organization. You can have all the logic and facts you want, but until you have the money to back it up you may as well be one of those Americans standing in front of the White House with tea bags hanging off of your hat.....ain't nobody listening to a fucking word you're screaming.
/r/MensRights31/03/13 12:32 AM
9

I don't really get into the debate about pro-choice or pro-life, as I am not religious, but killing a baby when it can survive on it's own....after birth. That's fucking murder. Am I reading that correctly?
/r/MensRights29/03/13 11:43 PM
3

I wouldn't be surprised if the article was written by a militant feminist. Many of these mainstream articles have the same type of style. This is how they argue. They set up a strawman, based on false assumptions, and knock it down. They don't care what the truth is, they only care about projecting their bias onto the situation.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 11:40 PM
2

I hate how the 4chan reaction, to Adria Richards poor judgement, is being associated with "sexism" in tech. Harassment and sexism did not come anywhere near this case itself. 4chan just did what the always do after the fact. These are two different things but the media seem intent on pinning 4chans reaction on sexism in tech.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 09:44 PM
6

Uncut here. I grew up in the US. Unnecessary circumcision capital of the world. As I had various girlfriends through High school and college, it never mattered. Most of them may have not liked the idea of an uncircumcised penis, but none of them really knew what one looked like. So, when they saw mine, usually erect, it was extremely difficult to tell. Also, any woman worth dating, won't give two shits.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 07:00 AM
3

Scientifically speaking, and I am way to lazy to post research, if you have horrible hygiene and you live in Africa you have a higher chance of getting STD's....specifically HIV. Also, the research that shows that is highly suspect. However, if you live in a first world country with soap and showers to wash under foreskin regularly, it makes no difference.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 06:57 AM
4

She's like Joan of Arc.....without the visions. ;)
/r/MensRights29/03/13 06:54 AM
-1

That woman has serious problems. I see why you mentioned SRS OP.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 06:46 AM
1

Just want to let my fellow redpillers know that this thread has been invaded by SRS. If you see anything unusual, now you know why.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/13 12:53 AM
-1

It's in your fucking head. You're in the wrong place.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/13 12:52 AM
5

Aoooooooo!
/r/MensRights28/03/13 10:51 AM
6

I say we make sure that if she gets re-hired, her employer faces a barrage of e-mails and primary and secondary boycotts. I highly doubt she's getting her job back. She's toxic to SendGrid now. I have to say I feel sorry for that company. Good lord. They hire a woman they think is going to give their product a good name, and probably before anyone knew what was happening, 4chan was DDOS'ing them and ordering thousands of pizzas in their name. It seemed like they fired her as soon as they could, …
/r/MensRights28/03/13 08:30 AM
7

I'll have my double blinded, placebo controlled meta-analysis on the blatantly obvious out to you by next week, professor. Edit: Also, anecdotal evidence is evidence....it says so right there in the name.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 06:20 AM
15

"you have to shut up while I yammer on about nothing, and then you have to agree with me." Modern Feminism in a nutshell. "My feelings dictate what's best, so you can shut the fuck up."
/r/MensRights28/03/13 04:16 AM
7

You have to hit them where it hurts.....in the lulz.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 03:18 AM
3

.....and 4chan. Those guys give ME nightmares.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 02:17 AM
23

Sometimes I wonder if this discrimination against women in these tech fields is blown out of proportion. Feminists see imbalance, and where they see imbalance, they see a victim, and where they see a victim they see a cause to be heroic. The reality behind why the imbalance exists to begin with is never part of their cognitive processes.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 02:14 AM
4

Contracts. Contracts would solve this problem.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 12:42 AM
0

My mother used to ask me "Do you think money grows on trees?" and I was all like "but Mom, we need a loaf of bread." Anyway, it's like the court system actually believes that money grows on trees and the only way one has access to that money is having a dick to stick in the keyhole of a door that opens to a vast orchard of money trees. Weird.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 12:34 AM
38

Other women were doing just fine in tech, and the industry was responding well to the lack of women in the profession. It's her personality, always painting herself as a narcissistic hero or a perpetual victim, that people have a problem with.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 12:27 AM
51

The whole "I can't comment on the specifics of this issue." is a strong red flag that she's taking it to court.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 12:25 AM
41

Based on the reactions I have seen to this situation, I think it's safe to say the media were fools to begin with.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 12:23 AM
16

It appears as if she will be trying to make the case that the guys who were talking about dongles were contributing to sexism, harassment, and possibly some sort of hostile work environment. I have no doubt that the reaction the internet had was rough on her, but that has nothing to do with sexism in the tech industry. All that aside, It's interesting to see the depths of illogicality these people will go to make someone(or themselves) a victim of sexism or harassment.
/r/MensRights28/03/13 12:22 AM
73

"When I think of drug crime, I think of Mexicans. So I would not hire a Mexican to do my landscaping. I'm not discriminating against Mexicans." Yep, this checks out as grade A, doublethink bullshit.
/r/MensRights27/03/13 04:58 AM
3

But testing at birth might prove that the woman is a cheating liar. Feminism can't have that. It might not paint victim as a victim. At some point you have to see feminism for what it is: A special interest group.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 03:42 AM
8

Their argument is that men get too uptight about "ownership" of children. They actually believe men should be responsible for any children they feel we should. I wish this was a joke, but I read radical SRSers trying to sell this daily.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 03:40 AM
6

I have no evidence that what he is saying is true or false....but I can tell you it would not surprise me one iota if it were true.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 03:39 AM
1

Scary shit. Unbridaled feminist ideologues are just as dangerous as any other ideologue at the helm of that type of power.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 03:37 AM
1

Wow. That was really good. I feel like I need more.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/13 11:34 AM
2

This whole Adria Richards thing makes it easy to spot the wack job bloggers. Fuck. The internet gonna do what the internet do, but you really have to be fucked up in the head to defend this woman's actions.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 11:21 AM
2

For fucks sake. How can they possibly be that fucking stupid?
/r/MensRights25/03/13 01:56 AM
1

Well said. I have not red a more perfectly articulate assessment of this situation since it started.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 12:15 PM
1

Actually, it seemed relatively clear to me that if they did not fire her internet users were going to destroy the business. They made the decision in the companies best interest that had nothing to do with her race, nationality, or sex. Sounds pretty easy to defend.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 02:08 AM
1

That is some of the dumbest shit I have ever read.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 02:01 AM
0

You assumed I meant "women" when I said masquerading, and what I meant, and indeed what I said, was "radical feminist." You projected the whole "Are you implying women shouldn't be at tech conferences?" Hypersensitive morons are usually the people who are the target of bullying and jokes and are usually deemed such by the originators of the jokes This person was not the target of bullying or jokes....not at the conference at least. In fact I think a very soild case can be made that she was the b…
/r/MensRights24/03/13 01:53 AM
0

She didn't "get" him fired. Instead of turning around and confronting him privately, like an adult, her actions led to him losing his job. are you implying women shouldn't be at tech conferences? True colors showing through? Not at all, this is what you are projecting on my words. I have no problem with women anywhere. I have a problem with hypersensitive morons who can't handle problems like adults. If it's loud enough to be heard from the distance she took the pic, it's not really eavesdroppin…
/r/MensRights23/03/13 09:50 PM
3

Twitter is certainly populated with a different breed. I will never understand that culture.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 04:58 AM
4

Well, technically she didn't threaten a lawsuit. She said "You'll be hearing from my lawyer." Which, quite frankly, offends me.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 04:49 AM
5

She could still bankrupt them if she files a lawsuit.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 02:22 AM
8

Well, she already called herself "Joan of Arc." so sainthood isn't that far of a stretch.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 02:20 AM
8

Classy. Well done. Make sure you support this company, in whatever way you can, for making the right decision in this matter. Especially if Ms. Richards decides to file a lawsuit as she has already threatened to do.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 02:20 AM
3

It's definitely got potential to become a lawsuit, but it seems pretty cut and dry that the termination was not discriminatory. As a black, Jewish female she has an EO case, but who knows if she could win it.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 02:04 AM
23

Update: Ms. Richards has apparently responded to her termination and has threatened a lawsuit. (http://i.imgur.com/IaQXGng.png) Now that her company might be involved in a lawsuit, I urge you all to help this company survive the process. They made this decision for the best of their company, because of our outrage. Let's make sure they are rewarded for making the right decision.
/r/MensRights22/03/13 01:03 AM
2

I feel like a little kid on Christmas. I want to know how this is going to play out. RadFems are so good at shooting themselves in the foot when they finally get to speak on an issue like this. I just can't wait.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 12:11 PM
78

I hereby deem this fiasco: Donglegate It is about 4:30 AM central time. I have been following this thing like a soap opera. Yes, I am aware of my lack of life. It's interesting because there have been almost no responses from Ms. Richards or the person fired (allegedly) since this whole thing went viral. Much of this is speculative at this point, but here is what I have read and compiled so far: Apparently, there seems to be some question as to who was fired and if he was actually fired. The guy…
/r/MensRights21/03/13 09:47 AM
9

If the guy with three kids hadn't gotten fired I'm sure this wouldn't be as big as it is. She made a choice. She choose poorly. As soon as she published that nonsense she should have been expecting backlash.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 04:40 AM
2

Well, 4chan is going absolutely bonkers with this, so I doubt she will have to make up death threats. Aside form the threats, 200 Pizzas, a few hookers, and probably a free BowFlex video will be making it's way to her front door soon I'm sure.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 04:38 AM
-2

3 birds with one stone.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 04:35 AM
-2

Better fire her just to be sure.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 04:35 AM
2

Same with people who say "White Male Privilege" in a serious tone. She did that too.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 04:34 AM
1

Your "ETA2" article comes from a source that is notorious for taking the side of the radical feminist overreaction.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 04:33 AM
50

I could see them make a case that this has nothing to do with technology, but when radical feminist trolls are masquerading around tech conferences, eavesdropping on conversations, publishing the results, and getting people fired.....I'd say that's something I would want people in the industry to know about. Or they could have deleted it because there is already a large thread on it.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 04:25 AM
3

I'm not sorry. They don't get to control my thoughts.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 10:33 AM
2

It should be a woosh for everyone :) ...just like the info graphic that OP posted. It compares pieces of data that have nothing to do with each other and makes a recommendation that has nothing to do with either piece of data.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 09:57 PM
42

Well, in OP's defense, any radfem worth her bra would call that first degree rape.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 01:26 AM
114

Amount of times I have gotten an apple when bobbing for apples: 1 Amount of times I have purchased shark products for "enhancement": 6,100 Isn't is time we saved the whales?
/r/MensRights06/03/13 01:23 AM
7

Guilty until proven innocent. Welcome to Radfem 101.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 10:57 PM
1

I try not to let it get to me too much @ srssucks. Keeping a sense of humor about it and understanding that SRS is not playing with a full deck helps.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 10:55 PM
2

The problem with "privilege" is that there are an infinitesimal number of things you can apply it to, thus making someone a perpetual victim of any other person. Your car is faster than mine and you can get to work on time? Check your car privilege! We could literally go through accusations of "Who has more privilege?" for years, and would be no closer to solving rel problems.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 08:21 AM
14

I'm not sure I like the idea of "Mandatory", but fully available and admissible in court with no time limit on when a man can sue a woman would be a nice thing.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 10:58 AM
1

That detail was not specially in the article but she did say "We had sex" not "He raped me", which would leave one to believe that consent was there. So in that respect, I don't really understand how your faux-moral reprimand of /r/mensrights holds any water at all. If there was NOT consent to begin the act of sex, then I suspect the "victim" in this case would have said "I told him no, but he forced himself on me and raped me." instead of bringing up the whole thing about telepathically sending…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:51 PM
1

People change their mind.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:09 PM
1

Yes, SRS.....We're the extremists. Keep fuckin that chicken. Why does everything have to be black and white with you people? She changed her mind and consented to sex. It happens all the time. There is absolutely no way for the man to know she was screaming "stop" on the inside. This is absolutely absurd. We can't take all the men who have changed a woman's mind in the heat of the moment and throw them in prison because people like you choose to interpret the situation in the most extreme way co…
/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:07 PM
2

I'd rather live off the grid than be a slave.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 01:21 PM
3

Anyone notice the striking number of false rape accusation posts on the front page today?
/r/MensRights27/02/13 01:17 PM
5

(http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/3t5s10/)
/r/MensRights27/02/13 01:16 PM
15

When the girl asked "Was I raped" it was just silly. When the columnist said she was likely raped, it felt like I was reading some surreal form of twilight zone trolling that I have never encountered before.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 01:12 PM
21

I can confirm this. The lack of psychic power is not a crime.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 01:11 PM
4

TIL: Lacking the superpower of telepathy might lead to an accusation of rape. Good to know.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 01:09 PM
31

It's like they gave one half of the caption to a reasonable person then handed it over to SRS.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 10:54 PM
1

One could make the case that, when discussing rape, it does behoove people to dedicate a larger portion of the attention to female rape, as it is, by far, the most common. In terms of domestic abuse, including physical and psychological abuse, I see absolutely no reason whatsoever to give abuse against women the lions share of the attention.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 10:37 PM
2

Try this (http://www.reddit.com/r/SRSsucks/comments/16lebj/new_tagging_code_for_res/) You will need RES and you will need to not mind losing your current tags.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 04:37 AM
20

It's hard not to seeth when you look at SRS threads. I often wonder how these people function with such a load of cognitive dissonance that must weigh on their shoulders all day. Best thing is to just not go there. Arguing with one of the loonies in the wild is one thing, but reading the fempire is another....It's not a healthy discussion.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 01:10 AM
5

I have a script from SRS sucks that tags anyone who contributes heavily to SRS, so if it wasn't recent it has been in the past. The nature of the question (concerning incest) would also hints at the company they keep. Here is the question: (http://www.reddit.com/r/IAmA/comments/18tv7j/i_am_warren_farrell_author_of_why_men_are_the_way/c8hwxz8)
/r/MensRights20/02/13 01:08 AM
59

A fucking SRSer has the top question. Figures.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 11:18 PM
3

900k? It's not crime when the government robs people. IF they are that worried about the kids welfare, maybe they could just give the wealthy one custody instead of taking him to the cleaners for the sake of someone who has done nothing even close to impressive enough to warrant 900k per year.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 04:27 AM
3

Better a decorated soldier to have custody than a lying, cheating, perosn whose net value to the world can be estimated by the phrase: "Worked at Banana Republic for, like, 3 shifts."
/r/MensRights16/02/13 04:20 AM
0

There should be no limit on when paternity tests are admissible, and Paternity fraud cases should be able to be taken to court until the child is 18. Otherwise, go after the biological father. This is just despicable. I am ashamed that my legal system is this poor.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 04:17 AM
1

I'm sure the club just doesn't want a bunch of negative attention. Your average Mens Rights anything tends to bring the crazies (feminists) out of the woodwork. Fuck that shit. Fight on.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 06:40 AM
3

This is like Republican congressmen saying that the body shuts down pregnancies if it's a rape baby because some Christian magazine or pastor told him so.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 09:59 AM
2

It's an SRS thing, and others might say it as well. Basically it's a cop-out. It's their way of saying that they do not acknowledge that you just made an argument and they are going to ignore it rather than argue against it, because it came from a man. Intellectual dishonesty at its best.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 09:52 AM
2

Even I fell for it. I thought it was a bad idea on the parts of men to start something like this. Turns out it was a good idea.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 07:53 AM
-18

I have to agree. Without feminism, I would have nothing to mock and I would be bored :) Edit: Oooo downvotes.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 06:21 AM
2

You're lying.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 12:16 AM
4

Post removed: Your a fucking sick human being. Absolutely sick.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 12:06 AM
6

That's true.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 12:02 AM
8

The self important circle jerk and cognitive dissonance is potent with that crowd. I still think this is a terrible fucking idea. We don't need a Feminism VS Masculinism war. We need to be promoting equality, and this ain't gonna cut it. All this does is make it "Us against them."
/r/MensRights09/02/13 03:19 AM
3

This is a terrible fucking idea.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 03:16 AM
2

I get that a real rape victim has to feel comfortable to come forward and not have to worry about penalties, but when someone goes to prison, loses years of their life and God knows what else, and is then proven to be innocent.... It's time to pull out all the stops and drop the fucking hammer on the false accuser.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 11:14 PM
4

Naivity is not a crime.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 12:07 PM
3

(http://www.quickmeme.com/meme/3svz6w/)
/r/MensRights07/02/13 05:47 AM
1

The fallacy being used here is the belief that opposing an organization is tantamount to supporting everything it opposes - some sort of bastardized transitive property. I run into a lot of feminists who make logical jumps like this. I think it's pretty common. In this case they used the word "Shitlord" so it is safe to say the user frequents SRS which is another red flag of irrationality.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 03:15 AM
1

1 does not equal 4, thus 1 equals 5.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 03:14 AM
3

Nothing has ever fallacied as hard as that just fallicied.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 03:13 AM
12

I just don't understand how a culture can reward this type of behavior. This woman is obviously a horrifying human being, why would the court even give her custody after this kind of behavior? If we are going to make laws in "The best interest of the child", howz about not giving all three children to the lying sociopath while turning the only innocent party into a debt slave to the person who destroyed his life? Call me crazy.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 02:20 AM
17

No, they are not. They belong to three different men. If they are his, you should be able to prove paternity.....which you can't.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 02:18 AM
9

Time to get a passport and take the son on an extended vacation to Australia. If it wasn't for the son being mine I would burn everything I own, spend every dime I had and start over off the grid. Life is just too fucking short to be a slave to a cheater and the children of three different men that aren't me. Where the fuck are these kids biological fathers? Can't the law find these guys?
/r/MensRights07/02/13 02:14 AM
1

"Das jus ignant!"
/r/MensRights07/02/13 02:06 AM
3

Slit his throat, stabbed 27 times, and shot him twice in the head. Whether he was abusive or not I think it's safe to say that this woman should not be free for the rest of her life.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 06:40 AM
6

I seriously love when they protest. All people have to do is film the protesters and we can really get a good taste of what the kinds of people these radfems really are.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 06:25 AM
7

Radical liberal feminists don't like free speech? Say it ain't so.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 06:23 AM
3

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA MURDERING MEN IS FUCKING HILARIOUS!
/r/MensRights04/02/13 07:14 AM
1

Oh course not.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 09:00 PM
18

If we were to ask the knights over at SRS, they would say this is full stop rape because they girls were likely inebriated. You can't make this up.
/r/MensRights02/02/13 08:54 PM
4

I'm really tired of reading stories about how x-wives and the law seem to think men's only value is to be some magical fucking cash machine. As a child of a divorce similar to this one, I can speak from experience that it does not help the woman's relationship with the adult child when they realize that their mother practically removed the father from their life because a fucking lawyer told them it was in their best interest. Really sick of this shit.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 06:42 AM
7

Indeed. OP you have a unique opportunity to act as a truly curious person and see how deep feminism actually affects this professor and the law. Bite the bullet, learn the lingo and report back.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 06:33 AM
15

Girlfriend Dude, You have the golden ticket to ride. Get the fuck out of there and don't look back. This relationship has about as much hope as living in a cult compound in Waco Texas.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 01:55 AM
1

Whatever bullshit she can sling together to cover up the $150,000 fraud she committed.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 12:57 AM
9

Ive been told that this is not possible and the system has a way of making sure this kind of fraud doesn't happen. Just kidding.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 04:05 AM
1

Unreal.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 11:24 PM
2

"I forgive you for what you did and hope that you and God can make peace with it. I have no ill will against you." I would have the hardest time not answering: You're a fucking psychopath. It took me a long time to recover from the damage your lies did to my life. Don't ever message or contact me again.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 01:11 AM
2

Are there children involved? At first glance, this sounds like one I would slide away from. Nothing that I just read sounded like the relationship is in a healthy place.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 12:52 AM
3

Guilty until proven innocent, huh. No problem with this. Move along people, nothing to see here.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 12:48 AM
6

an 18yo female resident of Park-Stradley who also had sex with the "suspect" reported a rape and then had a change of heart. Must be nice to wake up, regret a conscious decision from the night before, and be able to legally make yourself a victim so you don't have to confront the poor choice you made. Because, nothing is your fault, you see.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 12:47 AM
1

Women: Strong enough to have autonomy over their own body, but not enough to show that body to other people if we don't want them too!
/r/MensRights25/01/13 12:30 AM
6

-errritime
/r/MensRights25/01/13 12:28 AM
-4

Wow. That is a beautiful distinction. From this point on, I will see a distinct difference between a Woman's Rights activist and a feminist.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 12:26 AM
8

For those of us who frequent SRSsucks, the user /u/TheIdesOfLight is a know nutbar of the first order. A fact which is on display here. We have a script that automatically tags SRSers in the wild, I know this isn't SRSsucks, but it really helps to have them pre-tagged for you so you know when you are dealing with the crazies. (http://www.reddit.com/r/SRSsucks/comments/16lebj/new_tagging_code_for_res/) Beware, if you use it, you will need RES and it will wipe out all of your previous tags.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 09:00 PM
2

I want one of them to write out a detailed picture of the type of culture they want, down to the last detail. I want to know exactly what happens to people that offend others with speech. I seriously want to hear the logic behind it. It would be the most humorous day of my life.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 08:48 PM
4

No wonder, he doesn't seem to get the simple concept of free speech. I'll bet he's one of those the professors lock the doors on when they see him coming.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 08:46 PM
11

Unless your opinions are not as good as my opinions....of course.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 08:44 PM
6

destroyed in an act of “forceful resistance,” by seventh-year human rights student Arun Smith. seventh-year<sup>Seventh-year</sup><sup>seventh-year</sup><sup>seventh-year</sup><sup>seventh-year</sup>
/r/MensRights23/01/13 08:44 PM
4

O_O That has seriously never occurred to me, and I am one hell of a capitalist pig.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 07:02 AM
1

Litler
/r/MensRights23/01/13 06:48 AM
8

They have been conditioned to respond this way. They have been convinced that MRA's are hate groups. Full stop. Many Christians use the same tactic when you attempt to have a discussion with them about their faith. "Well you're an atheist, so you don't even deserve the pleasure of hearing my arguments." It's a defense mechanism. The thought of having to change your entire outlook on the world is not only painful, but for many of them, impossible. The longer I do this the more certain I become th…
/r/MensRights23/01/13 06:08 AM
4

I'm sure you will discover we are not some perfectly aligned group who has it all figured out. That said I think our purpose, true equality, is something we all have in common. Welcome.
/r/MensRights21/01/13 06:15 AM
9

Yes. She earned it, doncha know?
/r/MensRights20/01/13 11:07 PM
2

So, my only question is how is this going to get funding? This is the gap. This is the final hurdle to getting MRA's and mens issues thrust into the mainstream....FUNDING. I'm pretty sure you will find a good deal of people willing to donate to your cause, but how are you planning on reaching them? Also, one piece of advice....keep your literature and mission as pure as possible. It is a lot more difficult for radicals to paint you as some type of sexist hate organization if you have your nose c…
/r/MensRights20/01/13 09:55 AM
2

I don't understand why two times is necessary in the first place.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 06:41 AM
11

Joke's on you, women are incapable of rape. Haven't you heard?
/r/MensRights20/01/13 02:56 AM
1

(http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=tool)
/r/MensRights19/01/13 09:18 PM
5

That'll be the end of that one. From the posts that I saw it looked like a toolshed anyway.
/r/MensRights19/01/13 01:18 PM
1

"So, I can make sure that my country stays safe by sending a bunch of people who aren't me to be fodder in war....and all I have to do is tick this little box to make that happen?" Come to think of it, the women in this case have a great deal in common with politicians in general.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 10:15 PM
-2

It's sad but some people use feminism to be horrible, horrible people. Not all of them, but some.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 12:28 AM
34

In other words: "If you disagree with us you are a hate group."
/r/MensRights17/01/13 09:30 AM
2

Due to pending false assault charges from her Every time. Every fucking time a thread like this get's submitted, this sentence is in there somewhere. Now, I have no evidence as to whether or not you are telling the truth, but this just comes up way to often for us not to have a study about how many women accuse their husbands of physical abuse in divorce settlements. The number has to be astronomically higher than what would be accepted as "average" in terms of domestic violence statistics.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 07:07 AM
1

Oh, I didn't get a PM, I was talking about the one from the OP of this thread.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 06:51 AM
1

Naa. My PM's are usually supportive and complementary.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 06:47 AM
1

Details of what?
/r/MensRights16/01/13 06:40 AM
6

Christ, talk about creepers. I have never sent anyone a PM like that in the history of my internet use.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 05:47 AM
21

This is false. I know because I was told, very forcefully, that only men could commit sexual abuse.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 11:33 AM
2

It would depend on the grade being taught. Typically, I would think there are more male teachers at high school level than primary school. My public high school, for example, was close to 50/50, and that was over a decade ago.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 11:32 AM
2

Any clue why she started swinging at him to begin with?
/r/MensRights15/01/13 11:29 AM
1

Because only feminists are for equality and care about boys............of course. Don't worry, be patient, they will get around to it.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 03:46 AM
2

It's because this is not about "privilege", as such. It's about having a name to call other people in order to retain your position as a permanent victim. This seems to be a constant theme of feminism. Asserting their power through always positioning themselves a THE victim in any situation. Doing so is a lot more successful than most of us would realize, and we need to make sure as MRA's we don't replicate the same behavior. I'm not out to be a victim.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 03:41 AM
3

Isn't it funny how "empowerment" seems to go hand in hand with "Entitlement"?
/r/MensRights15/01/13 03:36 AM
1

You must also keep in mind the distinct possibility that the "Coercsion", and threat to disown is a made up farce by the ex-wife. Not saying that is the case, but it is possible as no on really knows what happened here.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 03:34 AM
13

The Amazing Atheist did a Youtube video on this. It's very good.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 01:12 AM
3

Talk about victim blaming. This is fucking disgusting.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 01:06 AM
2

The biggest question I always ask in cases like this is: What, exactly will the woman be supplying if she gets half of his pension? What does she have to sacrifice? If she was a stay at home mom for years and look after his house then he can't be expected to go to work AND look after his own house and cook his own meals any more than we should expect her to go out and get a job. So, what will the woman be bringing to the table? Oh.....nothing. I see.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 09:24 PM
9

The absurd level of pedo fear in the US has reached 11. Time to notch it down kids.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 09:05 PM
7

This read like an angry,like, teenager who, like, does't have, like, a fucking clue what she's ranting about.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 09:10 PM
7

Haha, I get it, fathers are worthless because they arent women. O_o
/r/MensRights11/01/13 09:01 PM
1

OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOH
/r/MensRights11/01/13 06:24 AM
27

It's perfectly natural to look for motive. Especially when real, genuine rationality and courtesy in cases like this are such a rarity. I, for one, hope it's genuine.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 11:29 PM
7

One of these days feminism is going to bust open like a balloon on account of how many wingnuts they have let into their cult.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 11:27 PM
5

Go to the dean.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 11:24 PM
2

You need to make sure you tell the dean of the college or your adviser what you intend to do. I would think there is an ethical issue for a professor to fail you just for disagreeing, but stranger things have happened. Do the paper well and do it right. Then turn it in.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 07:11 AM
3

It's not sexist when feminists do it.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 07:04 AM
3

U'mm, what about the materials, production, construction, all the machinery to do those three things, and the CONSTANT air conditioning for the life of the business? At least ball fields return oxygen to the air and can support life to multitudes of species. Stupid logic is stupid.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 07:03 AM
3

"Hey, I think you're my cousin....can I live with you?"
/r/MensRights09/01/13 06:17 AM
10

We don't. There is no way to know these statistics exactly, but we do have some hints that give us a reasonable range. However, you can be sure that the feminist line "Only two percent if rapes are falsely accused, so we shouldn't worry about it." Is fucking horse shit and the last approach we should be condoning as a mens organization. Doing it the feminist way places the burden of proof on the accused instead of the accuser, and that's not how justice is supposed to work.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 05:44 AM
4

"Oh...that. That's just in case we want to send you off to work as cannon fodder while the women stay home, harshly burdened with the knowledge that you're dead. No worries champ."
/r/MensRights09/01/13 05:38 AM
1

Quote is good, but did he really say that?
/r/MensRights09/01/13 05:35 AM
0

Uhhh. Just reading that and looking at that picture of his ex-wife makes me ill. Fuck up's all around.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 12:08 AM
7

Not sure why you are being downvoted...I think, technically, this is correct.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 12:06 AM
14

It continues to amaze me how fucking brutal these feminists are to these guys. Sending the brunt of feminist hate upon them for being upset that giving a woman an emotional commitment that did not result in reciprocation of that commitment? This whole thing feels like a giant troll. Surely there are more pressing issues of female degradation that need to be overcome before we start beating guys, who's worst sin appears to be low self esteem, into the fucking ground.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 09:43 AM
1

Keep in mind that feminists have absolutely no idea how many actual rape occur vs how many are reported....and you can be fucking certain they have no idea how many 'rapists' are being falsely accused.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 06:10 AM
8

I can see that side of it, however I think what bothers me is that it needed to be specified. Fathers should already be included in "Parents Room."
/r/MensRights07/01/13 10:41 AM
3

This entire issue is so unbelievably complicated, and feminists are not helping with this ever constantly shifting definition of rape. Who knows if research/data like that is even possible.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 04:54 AM
2

I was cringing for something sexist, I was pleasantly surprised.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 04:49 AM
7

I am constantly shocked how much denial women/feminists have over this issue. To them, the man is always, always, always, guilty until proven innocent. It's sickening how the justice system falls for this shit so often. My parents were divorced when I was 6, and luckily my mother did not do this to him. However through both my mother and father I was around no less than 5 other divorces. I knew these people very well, the relationships were peaceful. Each time, as soon as the female got a lawyer…
/r/MensRights06/01/13 09:38 AM
2

Wow. That case has "fucked up" written all over it. Miscarriage of justice for sure.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 09:25 AM
4

Privilege, Rape culture, I'd just like to point out that these things are not real. Nor is "The Patriarchy". If there were such a culture of men oppressing women, "Rape" would certainly not be the best choice of words. This provides yet another example of feminists degrading what the word "Rape" actually means. These feminist labels are actually more of a first world problem. Non-oppressed people looking for ways to victimize themselves yet democide, genocide, and slavery are nowhere to be found…
/r/MensRights05/01/13 12:21 AM
5

As someone else mentioned, SRS is a subreddit called /r/shitredditsays. Their stated mission is to call out people on racist, homophobic, etc. posts. the trouble is, they have molded themselves into a pseudo-social justice organization who's enemy #1 is white males. All offending posters are assumed to be white males. Since they do find white males troubling, their views tend to run parallel to that of fanatical feminism....which is why you will hear SRS mentioned so often here. We like to have …
/r/MensRights04/01/13 10:17 PM
25

It's why women's organizations and their psychotic fans (SRS) have been stepping up the ridiculous narrative that mensrights = hate groups. They know how the game is played. They know that if they can get people, who are otherwise ignorant the the entire debate, to knee jerk believe that mens' rights groups are hate groups they will side with feminists without seriously looking into MR. So yes, we are making ground. They are getting scared, and the more scared they get the more ruthless they wil…
/r/MensRights04/01/13 11:42 AM
34

I think you are getting many of them the same way you got me. SRS lunatics are driving people toward MR as soon as they realize that SRS is selling crazy.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 11:37 AM
2

aaaand Dun
/r/MensRights04/01/13 10:13 AM
3

Fuckin' done. Also, I solved world peace for you.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 09:52 AM
5

Done.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 06:47 AM
3

Oops. Maybe we shouldn't launch genital mutilation campaigns, based on really flimsy evidence, and tell people that it will help keep them from getting AIDS. Because that is fucking stupid.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 05:38 AM
1

It's not funny, and I get that you probably didn't mean it to be. But when I read your comment I could not stop laughing.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 05:35 AM
5

If anyone lies about a rape, and there is concrete evidence proving they have done so (i.e. not just a verdict of "not guilty" in the case of the accused rapist), they should serve the same amount of time in prison as the accused rapist would have.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 05:24 AM
26

Wow. Confirmation of spermjacking. Can't wait to throw that one at an SRSer.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 05:16 AM
2

It's really kind of sad to me in a way. The man's wife lives, with his children, in a 2.5 million dollar mansion in another country, yet he has the audacity to sit there and tell the story with a smile on his face. That, my friends, is a better man than I.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 05:05 AM
2

(http://www.eagleforum.org/column/2006/feb06/06-02-08.html) There ye go.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 05:00 AM
12

Would be interesting to see a per capita figure for that.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 01:23 AM
3

The post was bullshit until proven otherwise. It did not add to the discussion, it distorted the discussion. Thus, the downvotes.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 01:20 AM
3

SRS is jerking themselves raw over the /r/politics thread. These people are completely unspooled. It's difficult to imagine a more ignorant group of people. All of them keep insisting that no one commenting on it has ever "read the bill." They are all experts on it of course.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 12:59 AM
3

You got listed in the SRS thread. Which means you won't be getting any reasoned sanity in any of your replies.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 12:58 AM
3

Bill gates might do a lot of good through his efforts, but I think he needs to sit this one out.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 12:52 AM
3

Some women make it their business to use the justice system to game their way to better financial futures. It's fucking sad, but it happens all the time. They will deny it happens all the time, of course.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 12:09 AM
8

Nice concern troll. The location of the link doesn't invalidate the words inside, nor does it make it less humorous.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 12:05 AM
2

The feminist movement and Pseudo-social justice warriors are chocked full of people who use conjecture, feelings, and false information to make claims. Grapeban made a statement that requires evidence. The statement is false until proven otherwise.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 12:03 AM
1

Source, please.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 12:01 AM
-2

Wow, that's a good observation. I suppose a better question, then, would be: "How do we decrease the number of real * rapists?" or "What are the differences in cultures that have more rape as opposed to cultures that have less rape? *By using the word "Rape", I am using the actual definition of the word rape, not the constantly flowing definition of rape SJW's want to believe in. EDIT: Not sure why the downvotes. Also, I removed the word "India".
/r/MensRights04/01/13 12:00 AM
9

Luckily they have witness evidence of stalking.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 10:23 AM
25

No physical evidence of rape was produced at the trial. These words right here. These are the words that boil my blood. This phrase, right here, is why I will always financially support MRA's and I will always fight Feminism and SRS until they embrace the idea that NO FUCKING HUMAN BEING IS GUILTY UNTIL PROVEN INNOCENT and NO WORD OF A WOMAN IS ANY MORE VALUABLE THAN THE WORD OF A MAN SIMPLY BECAUSE OF HER GENDER.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 09:53 AM
1

Oh my God. How int he flying fuck does someone just give away a child with only the consent of one parent without a death certificate?
/r/MensRights03/01/13 09:44 AM
13

Stabbed 27 times, slit throat, and shot in the head. Doesn't sound like a gang initiation or somebody coming in to steal the stereo. That's rage. Pure unbridled, psychotic rage.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 09:42 AM
13

Duke rape case is a decent high-profile example, although it did not actually work out for the accuser. It was certainly close to destroying three innocent lives based on absolutely no sound physical evidence.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 09:40 AM
8

Doesn't look like this abuse story is going to hold up. If the evidence is as clear cut as that article is making it sound, the state is going to execute her. This does illustrate how easy it is for a women to mold herself into a victim anytime they feel cornered or powerless.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 09:37 AM
7

You need to get a passport immediately if you do not already have one. No reason to be a debt slave to this woman for the rest of your life.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 09:29 AM
2

This "false assault charge" thing is getting to be a regular occurrence around here. Scary shit if it is really happening as often as is reported.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 09:26 AM
2

From Pizzey's wikipedia page: In her book Prone to Violence Pizzey has argued that many of the women who took refuge had a personality such that they sought abusive relationships. Pizzey describes such behaviour as akin to addiction. She speculates that high levels of hormones and neurochemicals associated with pervasive childhood trauma lead to adults who repeatedly engage in violent altercations with intimate partners despite the physical, emotional, legal and financial costs, in unwitting att…
/r/MensRights03/01/13 03:26 AM
2

That whole "Not all feminists are like that" argument is so fucking thin these days. Anytime I ask one of them, "Well, you tell me what feminism is?" They give me some sort of picturesque utopia where feminism makes everyone equal, which is the exact opposite of the way I see self described feminists behaving.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 03:21 AM
4

I find it absolutely hysterical that she would get death threats for stating that females are just as likely to commit violence. That kind of cognitive dissonance deserves some type of award.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 03:17 AM
2

That's not creepy. Not at all. o_o
/r/MensRights03/01/13 03:01 AM
10

women are systematically oppressed compared to men Citation needed. These are fairy tales. There are men out there who are chauvinistic pricks, end of story. You don't have to associate with them. There is absolutely no evidence for some overreaching Illuminati-like conspiracy of a "Patriarchy" that keeps women systematically oppressed. It's all in your head. If I'm wrong, prove your case.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 02:26 AM
10

Just like people who use the word "Illuminati" IMO.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 02:20 AM
3

I don't think any "public" figure could come out against SRS, as it would be similar to coming out against someone like MLK. The trouble is SRS is not a kin to an MLK like reputation when you look at their actions. Their stated mission and original goals are entirely different than the actual mission and actual accomplishments of its users. In short, it's a cesspool of people who, for better or worse, really want to control the behavior of others, limit speech, and apparently wildly misrepresent…
/r/MensRights03/01/13 02:18 AM
2

Yea, no brigading, but SRS has this on their front page so you know that their nonsense will need to be countered in the thread.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 08:50 PM
12

Yay, common sense legislation.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 01:45 AM
2

Will feminism pay for male birth control medication when it comes out too? Where can I apply for feminism funds?
/r/MensRights02/01/13 01:42 AM
7

Following the recent Ontario/Canada Roundtable on Gender Equality, the below provisions have been proposed for the new Human-Robot Personal Relationship Act, the first draft of which is currently being finalized. The provisions are specifically meant to target the concerns that were expressed at the roundtable that sexbots will negatively impact the pursuit for gender equality and may unduly emphasize the objectification of women as sexual objects That. That right there is fuckin stupid.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 09:50 AM
11

Does this actually happen?
/r/MensRights26/12/12 08:56 PM
5

Yes a vasectomy is a god option if you don't want kids. $3500 is a lot cheaper than kids, and that is one of the more expensive vasectomies I have heard of. On a side note, just being honest, your post reads like it was written by someone with serious trust issues. Take from that what you will.
/r/MensRights26/12/12 08:55 PM
6

It's because you were raised in a culture where every boy/man around you had a cut penis, so the odd uncircumcised penis seems unacceptably strange to you. Vanity is not an acceptable reason to mutilate a child's body without consent.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 02:22 AM
1

Gotta call Poes law on that one.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 02:10 AM
7

You don't have to be religious to believe in evil and immorality.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 02:08 AM
2

If you don't lose your custody because of the court system the next thing you should be worried about is losing them to your wife turning them against you. The visits get fewer and fewer, and the kids become more and more distant. Be proactive against this as it happens frequently.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 02:01 AM
2

As I said before, you need a passport. If she takes your children there may not be much you can do if that happens, but she doesn't own you for the rest of your life. Go off the grid or get out of the country. Australia is a nice spot if you can pull it off. Then you can spend the next few years devising the most effective way possible to keep/get in contact with your children when they realize their mother is a manipulative snake in the grass.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 01:58 AM
2

I would not be surprised at all if the lover was the one who put her on to the new lawyer, and had experience with this very process herself.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 01:54 AM
8

This is another perfect example of why MRA's exist. I have lost count of the amount of times I have heard one or all of the situations you mention here that have happened to friends and family over the course of my life. I'm sorry this is happening to you. She said that the lack of money was my problem, not hers. Indeed. This sounds like a woman who understand the legal system well and how it can be manipulated. I still have a hard time understanding how women are supposed to be treated "Equally…
/r/MensRights23/12/12 01:50 AM
8

If you do that, get a passport first. Also, be wiling to accept you may never see your children again.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 01:46 AM
10

With respect to the German people, they aren't the ones we need to be concerned about as they have been sane and rational on this issue for some time. Americans, on the other hand, are far to comfortable with this practice. I have an extremely hard time getting through to my friends about this.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 01:14 AM
1

Brain damage. The lot of them. It's fucking absurd to me that they still droning away at this gun control issue. They need to be talking about mental health and get these people the help they need well prior to events like this. Every time this happens Americans clean out gun stores and join the NRA at record numbers. Americans are not going to let people legislate guns the way Australia does.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 09:34 AM
1

I find myself agreeing. If you want to mock or bring attention to meta- feminist nonsense, please join us at SRSsucks. I really enjoy this subreddit as MR only.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 01:32 AM
24

Absurd. Completely and utterly absurd that the system still has the word "Justice" attached to it.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 01:19 AM
4

If women don't have to ask before getting an abortion, and I can't opt out of the pregnancy, then you better be goddamn sure I do not need anyones permission to have a surgical procedure to prevent that pregnancy. This is a SERIOUS BREECH OF MEDICAL ETHICS AND INFORMED CONSENT. You should not only confront them, you should report them to their registration board.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 01:15 AM
0

Wow, that was good. I'm all calm after reading it. It's like how conversations about gender are supposed to go.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 12:38 PM
21

...but I have been assured that women don't need men and that biological differences are just a lie by evil STEM's to keep the boot on women's throats. I just don't understand.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 12:30 PM
2

Lets see... a few major men's rights issues for me. Also, problems I have with feminism's overreach of power which go hand in hand with being active in MRA's. -Custody battles and divorce settlements. I have seen good men's lives ripped apart by very dishonest lawyers convincing the mans future ex-wife that she should pull out all the stops (making false accusations, lying, and coaching children) to get the largest settlement possible and the most custody possible. How the court system has not c…
/r/MensRights19/12/12 02:11 AM
1

Indeed. Equality FTW.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 01:41 AM
4

Wow....good work.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 10:20 AM
2

Lets call this whole "Hate group" nonsense exactly what it is: A giant fucking cop-out. A built in excuse that gives them some kind of pseudo-moral trump card to get out of having to make an argument. The exact same thing goes for the morons that accuse you of "Mainsplaining". Don't fall for that shit. Demand reasonable arguments, and if they can't deliver, put a feather in your cap and move on because the only thing that one has left is personal attacks.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:41 AM
9

I had a friend who went through a nasty divorce. He was a doctor. He got a job as a bar back until the divorce was finalized. Whatever it takes to protect yourself I guess.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:36 AM
2

Donations. Funding MRA's is the key.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 11:46 PM
3

Progress is being made, albeit slowly. My father went through two divorces in the south, each 20 years apart. The second one about 3 years ago. Things have changed. The lawyer told him with the most recent divorce "Do not expect a 50/50 split even though there are no children involved and they made the same income" (the split ended up being 40/60 with the 60 going to her). Although clearly not equal, this absolutely pales in comparison to the way the first divorce was able to get him.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 11:45 PM
6

When it comes to Farrell, I think we are dealing with his opposition, about 1% of people who have reasoned arguments, although still not valid. The rest of them are just copying and pasting things taken out of context and labeling him as a leader of a hate group. One thing that seems to remain consistent about ideological moments like this it the inability for the followers to do anything but call people names. I guess my point is, if they are that insistent on things concerning Farrell or other…
/r/MensRights16/12/12 11:40 PM
0

So, this has absolutely nothing to do with Michael Moore, but has anyone heard if this kid was on any type of psychotropic medication?
/r/MensRights16/12/12 11:27 PM
4

Sodomy huh? So, anyone going to jail over this?
/r/MensRights16/12/12 11:14 PM
1

Not shocked. I don't want to set up any straw men, I want to read their reply to this one. I really do.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 11:13 PM
22

Same here, but I live on the other side of the world from mine.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 11:12 PM
9

I'm in the middle of work, fucking crying.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 11:12 PM
1

-Reverse the roles. -Apply logic firmly. -Would a man be in jail for doing the exact same thing to a female studnet? -Yes - Put woman in jail -No - Just kidding, there's no fucking way a man would be free after something like this.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 07:38 AM
5

A peaceful people, bent on equality.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 04:41 AM
3

Thanks for this, now I just got to find the time to watch it!
/r/MensRights15/12/12 04:36 AM
15

To be fair, Nancy Grace will call anyone a rapist if it gets her better ratings.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 04:28 AM
2

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 11:28 AM
8

Apparently the girl toward the end of the video was doxxed. You know, the one that gave us all the creeps when she gave that poor guy a death stare while calmly slandering him by calling him "Fucking scum" and "Rape apologist".
/r/MensRights14/12/12 07:13 AM
14

I think this one was at the Warren Ferrell protest.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 05:37 AM
10

Son, did I ever tell you about the time I was interviewed for an article in the Daily Mall, that was read globally, about how I didn't want a feral, wretched, little piece of shit like you?
/r/MensRights14/12/12 05:34 AM
2

I didn't know the Daily Mall was reporting on the pathetic personal preferences of pedantic people.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 05:26 AM
2

No kidding. Find me the branch of feminism that deals with violence against men and unfair custody hearings.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 05:00 AM
2

Great point. Absolutely true. The more of these desperate rage quits, the better MRA's are doing.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:23 AM
-1

Fucking strawmen. Strawmen everywhere. For fucks sake. I have never once told a woman to "get in the kitchen." And that shit about those rabid extremists at the Warren Farrell protest? Jesus Christ. Also, find me the branch of feminism dedicated to protecting men from being completely fucked in custody battles.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 04:21 AM
0

Yes. To the last one.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:28 PM
4

SHOCKED I SAY!
/r/MensRights13/12/12 11:03 AM
11

The woman’s statements, which were given under oath and accepted by a court, must be false. No one would ever lie under oath. I'm sure of it. Especially someone willing to lie on a job application and resume to secure a 100k per year position. Surely there are better people out there to defend.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 10:15 AM
10

Wait, what? Your title was this: Woman lies in court to screw over husband, husband exposes her lies to her employer, and she is fired. Husband is trying to get back custody of their son Your link went here: UM Social Media Director Jordan Miller lies on resume about bachelors degree, keeps job. What am I missing here? Edit: Jesus, tittyfucking Christ. This is awesome. I need popcorn.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:48 AM
-2

Control.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 05:35 AM
–

Because the death of men doesn't matter to feminists that don't give a shit about men. EVERYTHING in feminism is about the woman. What happens to the man in secondary in every case.
/r/MensRights12/12/12 07:40 PM
2

the only straws I see awww geee
/r/MensRights12/12/12 12:20 AM
1

Ken Burns is not the only one in denial about this case. Anytime you bring this up with a radical feminist, they dismiss it as something similar to "Oh, not that case again, that's old news." It is as if, simply because the case is a direct slam to their ridiculous ideology, it can't be used in an argument. Bullshit. The reality is, this case is a perfect example of the whole "Guilty until proven innocent" mindset that we fight against all the time. I see this kind of shit in science writing all…
/r/MensRights12/12/12 12:15 AM
2

Straws....straws everywhere.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 11:44 PM
11

I'm not sure it has to do with the women specific videos either. It happens to most of the videos I've seen there, regardless of the sexes involved.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 11:39 PM
4

From what I understand SRS has targeted /r/justiceporn in their raids. They go to youtube and flag all of the links. Youtube's policy is to shoot first and as questions later. Once a video gets enough flags it will automatically be taken down. All it takes is someone willing to wait out the raid and post a mirror in the comments.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 11:36 PM
3

I am the kind of nutter that gives feminism a bad name. Barmy. A gender hating sexist misandrist. Childish. Selfish. Unsisterly. A saboteur and troublemaker who derails feminist debates by indulging in cheap tricks and meaningless grandstanding. First paragraph. Done in one.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 11:25 PM
13

It's not possible. It's dumb ass, women studies, legbeards who publish and blog bullshit to expand their cult's ability to identify themselves as victims. SEE, I'M A VICTIM. GIVE ME ATTENTION! All while devaluing the word "rape" to something completely unrecognizable to its actual meaning.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 11:51 AM
2

I was running along that line myself. Ralistic solutions to real problems....... as opposed to overzealous authoritarianism based on imaginary enemies.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 11:46 AM
1

I need to read more about this Dworkin character. Let me stop you right there pardner. A cursory glance and her greatest hits would be sufficient. Especially the part where she talks about exterminating men the same way Hitler talked about exterminating "The Jew".
/r/MensRights11/12/12 11:42 AM
1

Some of them are close to home, but most were just to spark some ideas. Good stuff.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 11:39 AM
13

Here's a few: I need Men's Rights because my mother spent my child support checks on her selfish needs while trying to convince me "Your father is a worthless asshole." I need mens rights because my ex-wife moved out of state with our children and her new husband and I never see my children. I need mens rights because I was treated like second class citizens in divorce and custody hearings. I need mens rights because frivolous accusations of rape are just that until PROVEN otherwise. I need mens…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 07:41 AM
25

I'm sorry this happened to you. I don't know anything about you or the case, but the mere fact that the ONLY EVIDENCE was witness testimony and yours was seen as less credible than the womans', is evidence enough that we still have a lot of work to do. I wish people wouldn't automatically assume "Rapist until proven otherwise." It's sickening.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 11:07 PM
3

So, at what point do we start just thinking of ourselves as a bunch of monkeys slinging around in circles on a big rock in the middle of fucking nowhere? We all have problems. We all have struggles. Life is hard for everyone. If there are no external forces of adversity, then we either project them, or create internal adversity. Even the richest of the rich white men have problems and stress. It is only when we accept the reality of our life, do what we love to do, and respect others that we can…
/r/MensRights10/12/12 09:46 AM
1

I can't say this surprises me.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 08:58 PM
0

The major flaw in those studies is that they were done where the standard of hygiene and presence of plentiful running water are drastically different than more developed countries. Since most of the pro science is only valuable to certain populations, the only real reasons to cicrumcise a child falls into three categories -vanity -religion -family tradition Those weren't enough for us. There are a heal of ethical and moral issues that accompany the practice. Each person still has the right to c…
/r/MensRights09/12/12 08:57 PM
1

This can't be true. I'm assured by feminists that the system is fair. I'm so confused.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 08:44 AM
–

SHOCKER! I had a friend recently circumcise his son. His wife insisted that they do it and he was on the fence. I wish I could have shown him all the science before he made the decision.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 05:38 AM
2

No sub is perfect. It's a start. Good talking to you.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 08:49 AM
3

This is the sound of me nodding in agreement with most of that. Seriously. That's highly unlikely in this subreddit as anything against the 'norm' in this subreddit automatically attracts downvotes no matter how well it was written. The thing is, down votes aside, you have a voice here. Here we are holding two very different perspectives having a discussion on /r/Mensrights. Isn't the ability to speak a valuable thing? One of the problems I find with feminism is the desire to stifle and shut dow…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:01 AM
0

I would kind of agree with you here. It's funny because this kind of thing can be seen as a microcosm in many marriages. Nobody wants to take responsibility for their actions, if those actions are producing negative results. We all do this. As one point in history, feminism had a point. They have a very good argument for human rights, and that argument changed the world. Some of the things they accuse men of may have validity even today, although I find much of it to be exceedingly radical and u…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:38 AM
1

Indeed. You have to get out from under the tractor wheel before you can start healing.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:26 AM
10

Do you have any evidence of this? Of course you don't. Please tell me again how SRS is preventing the circulation of the video. SRS and SRS types (active radical feminists and pseudo-social justice warriors) are doing three things. First they are using the "report" button just under the post. The second is they are flagging the video in Youtube. The third is they are downvote brigading the links here on Reddit. Generally, attempting to shut down the conversation instead of actually having one. L…
/r/MensRights07/12/12 12:18 AM
23

The thing is, /r/video's mods insisted it was political when it had nothing to do with politics. All while videos that are much more political get to stay. Something was definitely fishy there.... especially when even /r/politics insisted it was not political.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:56 PM
36

although people there tried to get it removed for "not being cringe." That scene toward the end of the video when that rabid girl was calmly, yet hatefully, slandering that poor guy to his face, calling him a rape apologist for going to listen to someone speak. I don't know how that isn't cringeworthy...I could barely finish the video.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:54 PM
7

Great job MRC. You have really been a champ during this whole episode.
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:39 PM
2

Feminists don't speak hate, just truth. /s
/r/MensRights06/12/12 11:37 PM
2

Good show. Lucky their hateful and violent antics were caught on film before they tried to paint themselves as the victim.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 06:57 AM
1

Shame the video gets taken down. I wonder what those reporting it are ashamed of. Shouldn't they be proud?
/r/MensRights05/12/12 06:55 AM
3

So, obviously I can't prove this, but it seems apparent that this was written by a feminist well read in cherry picking. The points the editorial brought up about Dr. Farrell were not even the topic of the talk he was giving, they were taken out of context and included to assassinate his character right from the start. Clearly just a hit piece trying to make the feminists there, the ones protesting violently, look like the poor, poor victims. Sounds familiar. Feminists are always the victims and…
/r/MensRights05/12/12 06:54 AM
4

Female rape don't real, I guess.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 02:06 AM
–

SRS actually succeeded in getting it off of the top of the /r/videos front page for reporting it as political, even though no part of it is political.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 02:00 AM
8

Yay! Jail time. Serious jail time needed.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 12:18 PM
16

But, I heard on Reddit that false rape allegations don't real and the man is always the rapist. I'm so confused.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 12:17 PM
3

It would have, but I don't think that's what they had.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:35 AM
15

Once, I knew a man who was married to a woman similar to this. He had a business which he shared with his brother and his father. The business was in his name. The woman was legally allowed to loot and bankrupt the business destroying jobs for 8 people. His new business was in his brothers name, and as for him, from that day forward he only worked in cash. He would give receipts to his customers, but he would only accept cash from them. He lived out of a safe, safety bolted to his concrete floor…
/r/MensRights04/12/12 12:01 AM
9

I had several girlfriends growing up that thought it was acceptable to hit me. Even playfully. I never hit them. Never. Even my wife did it (before we were married) before I laid down the rules. Again, it's in the culture. For example, women slap men in movies all the time.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 11:42 PM
2

Unos still exists?
/r/MensRights03/12/12 11:41 PM
10

A tangible effect of the Social Justice Warrior movement. This is why MRA's are so important. To these twisted minds, men are ALL hunchback barbarians with our dicks in our hands waiting to rape anything with a hole.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 11:38 PM
0

The only good man is a dead one I actually laughed out loud when I read that. That's how it feels when I read their comments sometimes.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 11:36 PM
3

Yea, the part about him remaining jobless is the most fucked up. What a culture.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 11:35 PM
13

Feminism has been unopposed in academia for so long they don't know what to do when someone challenges their religion. Hence the slinging of the term "Hate Group." Calling someone that is the only way they know how to defend themselves from well reasoned arguments. That's and violence apparently.
/r/MensRights03/12/12 06:59 AM
2

All blame aside, I'm sorry that happened to you. Divorce can be an ugly business all around. I am very happy to hear you are close with your father, even after all of that happened. Best of luck!
/r/MensRights03/12/12 02:27 AM
6

Could not have said this better myself. MRA's are a natural reaction to the excessive power amassed by feminism.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 07:27 AM
1

She does need help. It seems though that no one in her life really gives a shit about her. I read constantly about how her parents and friends are all complete fuck ups.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 02:14 AM
2

Her rap sheet is a mile long but I'm not sure if her lack of long term imprisonment has to do with the fact that she is a woman more than it has to do with her being a big name celebrity in an area with a notoriously poor justice system.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 02:13 AM
3

Feminism is absolutely ubiquitous within the culture. The second I read the original article, I knew there would be feminist apologists oozing through the woodwork to spray their bullshit. I would wager that a striking majority of members of the media went to very far left schools and were taught by people who identified as feminists.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 02:11 AM
2

I am uncircumcised. Not to make anyone feel bad, but It's awesome.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 02:07 AM
3

Yet another example of the unchecked power of feminism. Guilty before proven innocent.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 02:06 AM
3

Came here to say this. If nothing else, that was a beautifully worded essay.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 02:04 AM
16

Perhaps if you were not born a man, and thus a rapist, you would have been invited more warmly. Work on that for us.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 01:55 AM
5

"You Go Gurl." -SRS
/r/MensRights30/11/12 01:53 AM
16

I already have a passport! Yay!
/r/MensRights30/11/12 01:25 AM
3

I can't say this is a surprise.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 01:23 AM
1

So, the thing here is not what she did or what the rapist did, we can leave that to the courts. What's interesting here is the REACTION from the public and media. Here is a video that came out a while back about the media reaction to a similar case. Link
/r/MensRights30/11/12 01:11 AM
4

Those studies were such nonsense. Sub Saharan Afcira is not the industrialized world... soap and hygiene are a bit more common here. How the AAP could continue to base policy on these studies is unthinkable.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 12:47 AM
29

What universe is this moral? I would think a better way to handle it would be to give the male full custody without the possibility of visitation from the rapist. Otherwise, you can be damn sure I would be right the fuck out of the country.
/r/MensRights30/11/12 12:44 AM
3

Aside from religious reasons, here's why circumcision is currently protected: Circumcision is big business. Neonatal circumcision is the most frequently performed routine operation in the US. Doctors are collecting as much as $240 million yearly to perform 1.2 million needless operations on 1.2 million normal penises. Sourece
/r/MensRights30/11/12 12:42 AM
4

True, but lawyers could not do what they do without the law already being on their side. If laws didn't support or reward that kind of behavior, it wouldn't happen.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 09:05 AM
25

Judge Stong was determined that even if it is Campione that gets locked up, Canadians would know that the real villain, morally speaking, is Leo Campione, the father of the dead girls even though his alleged abusiveness was entirely based on his wife’s allegations and never proved A fucking judge. A judge who deals in the business of evidence and facts...said this. Why is it when a case involves a woman's word vs a mans, it is automatically the woman's word who is believed in cases of rape and a…
/r/MensRights28/11/12 06:34 AM
4

I think it is a beautiful example of how motherhood and the old adage that a mother will "do what's best for her children" can, in many cases, be completely be suspended in the mind of a woman who wants revenge or control over an ex-husband.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 06:31 AM
1

It's not really. The real stuff that typically happen, that are MRA issues are not this dramatic, but they are increadibly sickening. This case does have things in common with cases we see where women are hell bent on control over the man and using the children as leverage. This is just an extreme example. See this post for a story more relatable to MRA's.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 06:29 AM
11

Gallo said Murphy was a controlling, angry, calculating woman who did not want to share the children with her ex-husband. So, at some point, this sentence needs to become a critical part of the legal conversation. This is why I am here. A reasonable woman and man, who cannot make a relationship work, but remain communicative because of mutual respect as parents, are not the concern. It's the women who eat and drink control because the legal system has granted them ABSOLUTE POWER over a man's pri…
/r/MensRights28/11/12 06:20 AM
5

I have always wondered what the strategic advantages would be to "not stooping to their level." Luckily my mother never stooped to that level, so I have a very rich relationship with my father, but if she had I could easily see how, if only one side is doing the talking, it would eventually wear you down. What I wonder is, are we doing ourselves and our children a disservice by not fighting back in a personal sphere? Should the kids know, point blank, that their mother is a mental case and hear …
/r/MensRights28/11/12 06:00 AM
1

I would exhaust every bit of my being, go into every type of debt known to man, and blacken that woman's name to the highest degree possible before killing myself. The fuel to fire that vendetta would never run out. Evil deserves justice, one way or the other.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 05:52 AM
4

This is why I fight for Mens rights. I have experienced none of this in my personal life, and my father experienced only a shade of the incredible hardship you have written about here. This is wrong. It's just wrong. Feminism aside, MRA's aside, all the hate and bickering aside...it's immoral. All of it. There is no excuse for one human being to have that much unchecked power over another. My only question is, why did your son turn on you after you showed him all of that evidence? It feels like …
/r/MensRights28/11/12 05:51 AM
2

Fuck, I'm only on part 1 and already I am getting queasy.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 05:18 AM
6

Movies. They have warped perception for years. Before I was married, if a girl slapped me it was fucking over. She was dead to me. What's really fucked up is I got the impression that the ones who did it actually felt like they were the character in whatever movie gave them the impression that slapping men was acceptable. Social ostracism is the only way they learn that shit is not acceptable. Movies aren't real life.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 05:09 AM
1

At this point, listening to some dumb asshole try to convince me that one sex cares more about children than the other is just fucking insulting. Fuck this woman, seriously. Her and her stupid husband have had their 15 minutes and blew close to a billion dollars running their entire political party straight into the ground.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 05:43 AM
4

Yet; they still proclaim to speak for men. It's because the entire paradigm is based around an idea that says "What's best for the woman, is inevitably best for the man...because that's what our instincts tell us." They do not represent us, and if they cannot represent the male half of the population, then they are not for equality. In this case, you hit a very interesting irony. If we (men) represent "us" then by your statement, we can't represent equality either! In which case, reason and evid…
/r/MensRights26/11/12 05:16 AM
1

The running theme of feminism is simple: "It's never the woman's fault, the woman is never wrong, and the woman never lies." Simply using that sentence you can easily predict a feminists answer to about 99% of the questions. Not because reason, logic, or evidence.....cus feminism.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 05:08 AM
2

I would have loved to sit there and listen to some idiot drone on about how their ideology, which is entirely imaginary, is correct. As opposed to mens organizations which are a natural expectation when feminists groups continue to chip away at actual equality for the sake of their "feelings".
/r/MensRights23/11/12 03:29 AM
-1

This is what happens when radical feminism is at the helm of major universities and political organizations since the baby boomers could define "offensive". These are their ideas at work. Don't like it? Start funding and become active in MRA's
/r/MensRights23/11/12 03:25 AM
9

This is why I am in to mens rights. This shit shoudn't be legal. This is the price of allowing feminism to infiltrate the culture completely with almost no resistance up to this point.
/r/MensRights20/11/12 07:34 AM
2

This isn't how a thriving relationship is supposed to work. One of these people is fucked in the head, and the other one is fucked in the head if he continues the relationship. The only way this kind of behavior within relationships is going to stop is social ostracism. If no one dates these women, they can't ruin lives and they will either be forced to change or other women will see what it's like and decide that being a controlling asshole might not be the best way to approach a relationship.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 11:44 PM
1

Fucking justice, how does it work?
/r/MensRights19/11/12 11:40 PM
-3

How is this kid winning awards? Really?
/r/MensRights19/11/12 11:10 PM
2

I've seen this girl before. I have to call Poe's law on this one. This girl is just too stupid to be real. Then again WBC is real.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 10:21 PM
1

....or they are trying to expand their demographic. Never forget, the enemy to them is the middle and upper class white male. They will align themselves with anyone and everyone who is not that to achieve their political goals.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 09:14 PM
1

No radical feminist will ever come down on the side of a man. We see it on SRS all the time. If a 16 year old wants to have sex with an adult...good on her, she's a strong woman. If a 20 year old makes a comment about having sex with a 16 year old, he's a pedophile feeding the rape culture.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 06:11 AM
–

This is why we can't let radical feminism continue unopposed in the media, public policy, or university programs. It would be great if feminism had evolved into an idea of egalitarianism, but unfortunately, it didn't. This is a reality that many self described "feminists" have yet to face. Radical feminists have power and they have the ear of elected officials, which makes them extremely dangerous to men, and the nuclear family, in the long term. We have an entire gender, being convinced by a lu…
/r/MensRights19/11/12 06:02 AM
2

The bottom definition on the page is the most reasonable. Of course I've already noted where the feminists put it on the page.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 02:00 AM
1

Totally cool with women not shaving. I might be in the minority on that one.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 11:12 PM
–

I don't "Blame" anything on women. Radical feminists have tipped the balance of power too far, and the Mens Rights movement is simply a natural reaction to that overreach of power. I don't hate women, I want people to be equal in the eyes of the law while letting social ostracism handle any other objections or disagreements between the sexes. Feminists want to control speech and behavior BY FORCE, and in every case they insist that the woman must have a legal advantage. It is, very simply, wrong…
/r/MensRights18/11/12 11:10 PM
1

Because they just yell over you and delete your comments when you stand up to them. It's foolproof.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 11:06 PM
3

Comments like this are the reason I love /r/mensrights. Actual egalitarianism.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 11:37 AM
0

Because rape will always exist because there will always be rapists, just as there will always be murderers, kidnappers, and so on. Similar to terrorism, the war will never end. There will always be a market for brainwashing radical feminists.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 07:48 AM
8

Ahhhh, the disposable male. Just here to die for the feminists lack of privilege.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 07:45 AM
1

You're confused because you are using reason and logic. Just do this and it makes things much simpler. Ask the question: How does the woman in this situation benefit the most? The answer to that question will be what the feminists steadfastly supports with rage and sometimes violence.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 07:40 AM
12

The feminist ideology has infiltrated organizations like these and the government. This is why MRA's are so incredibly important to achieving ACTUAL equality.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 11:42 PM
1

If she shows her breast, she is being degraded....because radical feminism.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 11:40 PM
1

Hypocrisy at its finest with Dworkins name right in the middle of it. As usual.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 11:39 PM
4

How can exploitation like this not carry legal penalties for the female?
/r/MensRights16/11/12 02:13 AM
3

I would leave the country. Even if I had to live somewhere illegally.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 02:12 AM
-1

I like how everyone thinks this is fake when women absolutely have the power to make something like this happen. Maybe it's fake, maybe it's not, but I can guarantee there are a number of poor bastards out there with a story very similar to this one.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 11:24 AM
1

What could that mean?
/r/MensRights15/11/12 11:23 AM
6

He doesn't deserve it because privilege.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 11:59 PM
30

I actually live quite a nice and happy life. I am married to an awesome, reasonable woman who I have an amazing relationship with, so that's a good thing to start. My start with MRA was watching what the divorce process did do my father... completely legally. When he divorced from my step-mother, there were no children, and they both had equal paying jobs. My father was told, from his lawyer, not to expect anything better than a 40% split. The lawyer knew his shit because that's exactly what dad…
/r/MensRights14/11/12 05:43 AM
-1

Great question. Next question. Seriously though I would like to see some actual data before answering that and verifiable data seems to be a large missing portion of discussions like these.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 12:56 AM
3

Hmmm.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 12:53 AM
2

Why does it have to be one or the other with passionate fervor behind either perspective. Seriously, why can't we do both?
/r/MensRights12/11/12 10:57 PM
3

So have you ever actually heard any reasonable arguments as to why MBC is somehow negative or worse than FBC?
/r/MensRights12/11/12 10:54 PM
14

Well done. That about covers the crux of feminism: ME, ME, ME.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 10:49 PM
2

No, tell Obama we all need a nanny. /s
/r/MensRights12/11/12 06:49 AM
1

Schrodinger rapist I'm stealing that.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 06:44 AM
2

really if these feminists just used the word human instead of gendered terms once in a while they might end up with something that's not a pathetic excuse to hate or blame men. Amen. I can admit that some of what they speak against are real cultural problems, but their solutions seem to only benefit 50% of the world in a very extremist way. Start focusing on egalitarianism and the word "human" and they have a better shot at actually changing something.
/r/MensRights12/11/12 06:43 AM
2

I didn't downvote you. I think there is a difference between what you are discussing and cases like this. When a woman individually commits a crime, like cutting off her husbands penis, I would agree that the story is not a valid way to use evidence against "Women" in general. However, when that same woman is heralded as some sort of a hero in the all female line up of "The Talk", that's when we have a cultural problem worth talking about. Further, in this case and other cases, we have a situati…
/r/MensRights09/11/12 09:31 PM
8

The story highlights the unhealthy amount of power awarded to women in our culture for absolutely no other reason other than the fact that they are a woman. This is posted in the appropriate place.
/r/MensRights09/11/12 09:13 AM
2

At some point we need to come to the realization that many of these people are very disturbed sociopaths. The larger picture here is preventing sociopaths from gaining power over others. Not just talking about women here, but sociopaths in general.
/r/MensRights08/11/12 10:57 AM
–

Gentlemen, I am on your side in most cases, but as my pops always told me: "Pick your battles." I would advise you the same before becoming emotionally invested in this one.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 12:49 AM
1

While I can't say I agree with the way this case has been handled, I can certainly see where you are coming from here. This guy does have a lot of options, but the one he chose was to leisurely stroll up to the woman and deliver a huge blow to the chin. I can say that it pisses me off that her charges are not the same as his....assault. However, at the same time, he had other options to disarm the situation.
/r/MensRights07/11/12 12:47 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter