TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Human-Stupidity_com Archive

View 36 posts and 299 comments by Human-Stupidity_com on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
376

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights13/05/12 10:04 AM
62

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights17/06/11 04:36 AM
56

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights14/06/11 05:45 PM
56

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights19/01/12 09:55 AM
55

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights02/01/11 03:40 PM
55

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights12/04/11 01:31 AM
55

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights23/04/11 10:21 AM
47

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights20/06/11 10:13 AM
45

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights03/05/11 12:07 AM
26

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights19/01/12 09:45 AM
25

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights16/08/12 10:10 AM
22

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights21/12/10 10:01 AM
21

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights25/06/11 10:58 AM
18

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights13/05/12 09:54 AM
17

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights16/08/12 10:01 AM
15

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights02/07/11 10:05 AM
15

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights19/04/11 01:39 PM
12

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights16/08/12 10:21 AM
9

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights16/05/12 09:52 AM
9

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights19/08/12 10:50 PM
8

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights23/03/11 11:59 AM
8

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights20/10/12 10:44 AM
7

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights17/12/10 02:14 PM
5

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights20/10/12 10:43 AM
4

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights19/05/12 09:19 AM
3

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights19/05/12 01:56 PM
3

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights30/03/11 11:41 PM
3

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights26/12/10 01:09 PM
2

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights02/07/11 05:43 PM
0

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights14/06/11 01:23 AM
0

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights05/05/11 07:49 AM
0

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights18/12/10 12:51 PM
0

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights16/08/12 10:32 AM
0

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights26/12/10 12:33 PM
0

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights24/12/10 10:01 PM
0

Human-Stupidity_com/r/MensRights16/04/11 02:31 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

they showed that some people clearly saw it The woman made sure she did it 2-3 times, so everyone could see it When the man did it, several people saw it ............
/r/MensRights06/01/13 10:02 AM
4

well,, you would not want to offend a woman, just because she might be killing a man /sarcasm This is true for public drink spiking, but even for dick cutting and shooting sleeping men in the back
/r/MensRights06/01/13 10:01 AM
1

nicemod, I sent you a few private messages, but maybe they are shadowed too? I sent a message to reddit.com but no clue if anyone reads that, or if that gets shadowed too. Probably have to start a new life with a new reddit name, or give up on reddit. Who on earth has the power to give such a punishment without even knowing the accusation?
/r/MensRights11/11/12 06:24 PM
1

For weeks, the European Council and the European Parliament have been facing off over the lack of women on the European Central Bank's governing council. Now, that conflict is nearing a crucial deadline that may force a legal battle. At issue is "discrimination," as European member of parliament Sylvie Goulard put it in a letter to Herman Van Rompuy, president of the European Council, requesting "that at least one woman is immediately appointed to the ECB Governing Council." Goulard initiated th…
/r/MensRights20/10/12 03:45 PM
3

This is why the laws are wrong. These are the NEW laws that feminists have enacted while men slept and did not think of the consequences. Feminists managed to exempt women from all responsibility. Men can always be blamed. And I know lots of people will downvote me, because even MRA already internalized the new feminst "reality".
/r/MensRights29/08/12 11:49 AM
2

it is stupid if you know all the laws By normal "old" standards, if an attractive girl hits on you, you would not resist and offend her. But if you know that you are a rapist for yielding to her advances, yes then it is stupid
/r/MensRights29/08/12 11:47 AM
10

The teacher was female, and the students over 18. Washington, Aug 18 (ANI): An English teacher from Texas, who has been accused of having sex with five of her male students, has been sentenced to five years in jail. Brittni Colleps, 28, was convicted of 16 counts of having improper relationships with students. Since the young men were all 18 at the time, she was not charged with statutory rape.
/r/MensRights19/08/12 11:11 PM
1

Men's rights issue? Right to have offspring? Tricky ways for artificial insemination (could also be used against men's will) Is this true, would it pass a DNA test?
/r/MensRights16/08/12 10:33 AM
5

Some people may think Assange deserves to be extradited to the US for publishing secret US documents, some might think he is a hero and deserves freedom. But the fake trumped up "used-no-condom-rape" charges from Sweden are the result feminist laws and women plotting to hurt men unjustly.
/r/MensRights16/08/12 10:26 AM
2

There are a lot of lessons in the Dominique Strauss-Khan case (/articles/2011/07/01/dominique-strauss-kahn-rape-accuser-s-african-connections.html) about how rape investigations and prosecutions should be conducted. The most important is, don’t assume anything until all the evidence is in. The story is almost never what it appears to be on first impression. Everyone should have anticipated the possibility that evidence would emerge suggesting that a) the alleged victim might be in it for the mon…
/r/MensRights16/08/12 10:13 AM
6

note that no complaint was filed for attempted battery, assault. It was just taken for granted .........
/r/MensRights14/06/12 07:32 AM
2

some are even true. Women live longer, get more retirement benefits, subsidized by men's work. Women live longer,thanks to men working harder, dying more in work accidents, having more stress in general. And probably testosterone makes them more efficient and hard working. And then women want quotas. They want to live easier, longer, but equal representation in high pay jobs. Still probably working less hard.
/r/MensRights14/06/12 07:29 AM
5

but more influential then r/mensrights So it is worth analyzing, debunking, fighting against their mis-information
/r/MensRights14/06/12 07:27 AM
4

Äs long as it favors women. And is lesser money Men subsidize women's retirment. Women work shorter years, retire earlier in some countries, and live longer. Women Would Get 42% of Male Pension, if Unsubsidized! Brazilian Retirement Fund for Government Employees to Subsidize Women's Earlier Retirement.
/r/MensRights26/05/12 09:27 PM
0

"Attacking male sexuality" From this title I was expecting a discussion of majority issues. The majority of males could be attracted to older looking females under the age of consent (increased since women got the vote and constantly increased by feminists). He could fall victim to strict liability laws when he kisses and fondles a girl he picks up in a 21 and over bar and even if he verifies her ID. Even if the ID is her true government emitted ID. A mainstream male could be curious and look at…
/r/MensRights26/05/12 09:21 PM
7

Just posted this to 2x. Let us see what they make out of this. Three women U.S. Senators declared war on the “gender pay gap,” urging their colleagues to pass Paycheck Fairness Act. These same senators also pay their female staff members significantly less than male staffers. Even feminist female liberal democrat senators conspire to discriminate against women? But it is amazing: lots of feminists think that this shows that equal pay act is urgently needed. That this proves that discrimination i…
/r/MensRights26/05/12 01:17 PM
2

I can't believe that there is no way to marry and keep your assets totally separate. At least elsewhere in the world this is possible. If this is a California problem, consider relocating to a state that allows total financial separation during marriage. But yes, look for pitfalls in divorce. It is probably not safe to marry anyone even without debt.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 09:25 AM
1

Great link. Feminist progress is astounding: in restricting freedom and legislating bed romms and equating 17 year olds with children I reposted this in r/pedosexhysteria
/r/MensRights25/05/12 09:18 AM
1

Thanks for the link. Sometimes I forget that the truth about race is equally unknown as the truth about wage gaps, domestic violence etc and thus needs to be documented at every moment.
/r/MensRights25/05/12 09:11 AM
3

http://regender.com/swap/http://www.news.com.au/breaking-news/world/graphic-film-on-female-sex-tourists-cheered-in-cannes/story-e6frfkui-1226360720257
/r/MensRights19/05/12 02:06 PM
2

please do so
/r/MensRights19/05/12 01:59 PM
1

You may publish on Human-Stupidity. Also in inmalafide write a comment on human-stupidity.com for contacts. I am interested in s science, logic, fallacies, dogmas etc. At any rate I am interested to discuss the issues. You would have to work it out, because: lots of feminist claims are falsifiable. And still prevail. That is interesting. Feminists control the media, the United Nations. They even control our language and re-define "rape", "child", "porn", "consent", so you can have consensual rap…
/r/MensRights19/05/12 01:52 PM
5

yes, but women are not responsible for their actions. Men always are. Women are victims of men that take advantage of their mental confusion so they get surprised by a pregnancy. Much worse then women lying to men about birth control. I always wonder why empowered independent women can not earn enough to support their own children. Not even with government handouts?
/r/MensRights19/05/12 11:42 AM
4

Absolutely. The double standard! I don't have anything against consensual sex tourists, but this nonsense of lionizing them in this film and at the same time placing the responsibility for their actions on anyone and everyone but themselves, is grotesque. There's not a chance in hell a film about a balding 48 year old guy going to wherever for sex tourism would be about how he is a heroic victim and all his actions are the fault of the advertisers and the women who no longer find him attractive.…
/r/MensRights19/05/12 09:27 AM
-8

These issues are similar to why women get lower salaries and don't make it into top positions. Blacks have lower IQ, higher impulsivness, much higher crime rate. This is to a large part due to genetics. But if you add to that a culture that does not value school education, a family that might not even value the English language, etc then things get even worse. 168 times still looks pretty big. But it might be the extreme end of the Bell curve. And probably white boys behave so well that almost n…
/r/MensRights15/05/12 11:36 PM
1

very valid points. Probably more suited to law and philosophy students then to psychology students.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 01:41 PM
1

actually, not ironic. A sign that the professor is actually serious about research and truth and not a women's studies puppet.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 01:40 PM
1

There is one topic that is generally ignored: The absurdity of intentionally manipulative language This does deserve further research. About what people think when they hear xx raped yy. I got kicked out at various sites for asking "Which type of rape" (consensual or non-consensual) for example. Yes means No! Forcibly raping a 17 year old is the same rape as consensual love making. In all of science and law we try to define our vocabulary as clear as possible. But we have managed to totally mudd…
/r/MensRights14/05/12 01:38 PM
1

I post this separately because I know I will be downvoted. But is very relevant for academic researchers. The Rind study is an example how the US congress and senate decided scientific matters and overrides a meta research done in a major peer reviewed APA journal. Now I understand perfectly that people object to the idea of child sex being fairly harmless (under certain circumstances) But this does not justify repressing and condemning academic research. And this repression of academic research…
/r/MensRights14/05/12 01:14 PM
1

How feminists corrupt Domestic Violence research & warp world politics and legislation. A scientist analyzes how political correctness creates false and misleading research This is so shocking because it shows, in detail, the corruption of academic research itself by feminism, women's study etc.
/r/MensRights14/05/12 01:04 PM
3

Imagine if the guy were a WHITE MAN, hitting 2 black women. He would be worse off then Zimmermann and Trayvon. Being a privileged male is bad enough, if he additionally were a member of the privileged advantaged white class he would be much worse. Al Sharpton would start demonstrations and the New Black Panthers (?) would put up a bounty
/r/MensRights14/05/12 10:52 AM
6

the happening, not the resulting acquittal. so this satisfies our curiosity about what happened to the guy. He was lucky, the way the entire press distorted what happened.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 09:56 PM
2

possession and production is enough. If you circulate it you get caught more easily. But if the repair man, the principal, or the police find it on your cell phone, then they protect the minors from themselves by prosecuting them. Makes a lot of sense /s "Watching child porn victimizes the child". The Voodoo science of child pornography laws
/r/MensRights13/05/12 07:47 PM
0

Actually, if you are under 18, and look into the bath room mirror, you see child pornography (your own photo naked). So it is hard to convey to an adolescent that what he sees in the mirror is a terrible crime when photographed with a camera Mandatory 15 years jail for photos of legal girl friend: You Can Have Sex With Them; Just Don't Photograph Them
/r/MensRights13/05/12 07:45 PM
26

seems it has not be posted here before. Sometimes we are slow.
/r/MensRights13/05/12 03:34 PM
2

This shows that all the talk about best interest of the child is BS. It is in the best interest of the child to be cared in ways so he will live past 50 years of age. But best interest of the child always means "best interest of mom". This is why this totally is a men's rights issue. 7 lbs weight gain in 3 weeks? that is 100 lbs in 30 weeks. Pretty impressive. Have you, as a big healthy adult ever tried to lose 7 lbs in 3 weeks? this is a lot of weight
/r/MensRights13/05/12 03:31 PM
93

Clearly a man's rights issue. No women would ever be accused for self defense against two aggressive males. If you read the text of this and other articles linked from that article, the press reports are clearly distorted. McDonald's cashier Michael Joseph, 18, testified on Oct. 18 that Darbeau and Edwards, who both have previous arrests, provoked the beating by verbally abusing the restaurant's workers. He was slapped hard or punched and then followed behind the counter by 2 rough women with cr…
/r/MensRights13/05/12 10:07 AM
6

We are all in favor of not convicting anyone for sex with post-pubertal adolescents, there are some special issues here. 1) It is not clear if the boys were willing or if it was all purely induced by alcohol and drugs 2) looking at the photo of the woman (grossly overweight and unattractive) one might suspect rape 3) we would be in favor of acquittal if male "offenders" were treated the same way. But look at the pussy pass: Salmon, 46, was yesterday given 2½ years' probation, with no criminal co…
/r/MensRights13/05/12 09:59 AM
7

http://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=8101209&page=1#.T3llP9W8j6s http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H._Beatty_Chadwick http://old.post-gazette.com/pg/09192/983301-454.stm
/r/MensRights02/04/12 08:40 AM
8

Absolutely. We have to be careful to say such things because this would reinforce the stereotype that mensrights is a terrorist group. But seriously, if one's life is finished, by a malicious woman, malicious courts, malicious legal system. And if you have absolutely no way out. And if you go to jail anyway. And then get raped. It is inconceivable that no men snap and do something very serious that gets them to jail for a good reason. Even more so if they go to jail for non-payment of child supp…
/r/MensRights02/04/12 08:34 AM
9

He once might have earned that much. Happens to athletes all the time. Soccer players are at the end of their carreer and their pay drops. Arrest. If he gets lower pay, he is probably earning less on purpose so he does not need to pay the woman. /s The jail is just like a slave whipping, to motivate him to work harder till he drops. Every normal person has the right to stop working and become a bum. Even husbands do. Only divorced men or unmarried fathers are in indentured slavery. This is the r…
/r/MensRights02/04/12 08:27 AM
10

I also wonder what would happen if women were to sign such a waiver before going to a frat party or entering college. Or entering the army. Women and feminists would not take it as kindly and quietly as men do. There would be an uproar in the world press and several heads of state would speak up.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 08:23 AM
3

another example how men lost all human rights peope (or men) fought to get, for thousands of years. Debtor's prison does not even exist is a guy maliciously does not pay his debt. I wish it did and I could force some people to pay me what they owe. Only against men when they owe women. And they excuse it as in the best interest of the children And what about the men that don't go to jail but live in abject poverty as slaves that get all their money taken away? Who speaks about them?
/r/MensRights02/04/12 08:22 AM
8

They might put him in a cell with a known rapist, if he does not sign. If he get him in solitary, that might actually be a plus. I would prefer the safety of solitary confinement. But solitary looks like a punishment. Putting him in a cell with a rapist: ooops, we did not know
/r/MensRights02/04/12 08:19 AM
2

get a recorder. Or alternatively: I repeat: there is a free skype recorder you can install. Then get a few cents onto your skype account and call your voice mail. that should do the trick. Save several copies of your recordings in different places
/r/MensRights02/04/12 03:06 AM
2

buy a camera. Use a friend's camera. Use a cell phone camera. A camera photos has more credibility then what you type. You could type anything. Of course, try to preserve the original texts on your phone, too.
/r/MensRights02/04/12 03:04 AM
6

I would not mention that you hit her. Be very careful what you text. If I insist on using a condom, you will call the police? Are you serious?
/r/MensRights02/04/12 03:03 AM
1

can you turn on the speaker phone and have a witness listening? Is that allowed in one party states?
/r/MensRights02/04/12 02:45 AM
5

I am pretty sure that voice mails are not illegal recordings. She was TOLD that it would be recorded. You have to see how you can keep that voice message forever, how to back it up. If you don't find a better way: there is a skype recorder program, call your own voice mail and record it. And then keep several copies on several external hard disks you give to your friends. I am not sure if you can go to a one party state and call from there (if you have PROOF you were there when you recorded). Th…
/r/MensRights02/04/12 02:43 AM
1

Right. Most sex offenders did harmless stuff like sex with the future wife, peeing, or looking at photos. But it is sad to know that the really dangerous predators and potential murderers and forcible child rapists must not get voluntary castration, even upon demand, that would be against human dignity and human rights.
/r/MensRights18/03/12 07:44 PM
6

shocking. Please upvote. And actually READ the article.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 09:59 AM
3

If she cooked up 52 false accusations, that does not mean that the next accusation is false. It does not mean that she can not be raped. /sarcasm Of course, any evidence of 52 prior false accusations could not be introduced in court (no, this is not even sarcasm) And not one word about charging her with anything. Please someone put her up on register-it.com !!
/r/MensRights18/02/12 09:49 AM
8

If you don't post links, you don't need approval. Repost it without links, or put the links as plain text, without http or www
/r/MensRights02/02/12 09:14 PM
1

No woman would ever be charged with staring at a man's chest, while there would be thousands of complaints about harassment for men staring at woman's tits. Maybe male and female chests are fundamentally different? Or else, why can't little children buy tittie magazines but see male breasts in boxing events and on any beach.
/r/MensRights29/01/12 11:24 AM
-11

Should men be allowed to go with an erect penis where women are allowed with an erect clitoris and with erect nipples? From what I know, men with erect penises are frowned upon or illegal in nudity camps. Furthermore, may I remind that topless 17 year old boys can be photographed while topless 17 year old girls are child pornography causing year and decade-long jail sentences or at least sexting prosecution. So there seems to be a difference, don't you think so? Of course this is a rhetorical qu…
/r/MensRights29/01/12 11:12 AM
2

Nobody comments? Just because it is rich men getting screwed? Gets us back to the topic why a spouse should be receiving 500 Million. Even if she does not get any money, certainly the law suit will make the guy's life miserable for years on end. Friends of Mrs Young have told that the firm, which is unidentified, has handed over £3m so far and could make 30 per cent from the divorce case.If Mrs Young is awarded the £500m she believes she is due, it could see the firm gain a windfall of up to £15…
/r/MensRights29/01/12 06:35 AM
1

The REAL injustice, the men that go to jail for 15 years and never prove their innocence, this unfortunately does not get reported. Because there is no proof. The injustice is that people (men) get locked up upon the uncorroborated accusation of one lone woman. Like Strauss Kahn. And in this case here, seems some men were interviewed by police. This is scary enough. Traumatizing and scarring for life, if it happened to a woman.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 08:39 AM
0

Interesting. To an unbiased person he looks pretty much pro-woman. But as http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/on2uh/i_wrote_an_article_for_feminists_and_2x_blocked/c3ij06a mentions, being in favor of women having to put up the same work and effort for the same money is not what feminists want. He is just pretty just and correct and unbiased. If feminists hate him for that and even Obama and Clinton don't get his message, this is disconcerting.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 08:28 AM
0

This is getting off topic, so maybe you direct me to a proper place. If I post my own topic, I put like 10-100 hours of work into the topic. It is more correct and easier to link to my post. Now I am aghast about other topics that make it to top positions: 1 I hate this fucking attitude... This guy does not even say what his topic is about! He could say I hate this fucking attitude: women who leech off men to pay their nightclub bill I never understood how such people get votes. I think it is di…
/r/MensRights20/01/12 08:19 AM
-1

I have qualms with some of their topics. But being a proud girl is as good as being a proud boy. Accepting one's gender role (better say sex role) is actually a prominent men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 07:58 AM
1

I just looked at the list. It is true that he did not dare to say: "don't have a baby". But baby being an obstacle is implicit in most items. If you read the book, or keep viewing his videos, you can see that babies are an important issue. One issue is to marry a man that is willing to stay at home and take care of the kids. (and then not to despise that man).
/r/MensRights20/01/12 07:41 AM
-2

can someone explain how to avoid spam filter mishaps? It seems the site human-stupidity.com gets spam filtered because various attempts failed. Even a copy of this here did not make it past the spam filter. I tried to get an answer somewhere. Could not see how to get a reaction from x2c. Also, judging from what the moderators say, promoting human-stupidity posts is an unforgivable sin. If it made it past the spam filter, they would probably remove it anyway. You see, there was absolutely no atte…
/r/MensRights20/01/12 01:14 AM
-1

Unfortunately, you are probably right. Do you have an explanation why a pretty intelligent guy like Obama does not read Warren Farrell (or the human-stupidity article that is so dangerous that feminists want to keep them away from women)
/r/MensRights20/01/12 12:53 AM
-5

There must be a feminist vote brigade here. Not possible your correct data gets net 4 downvotes, and the calantortain gets net 14 upvotes.
/r/MensRights20/01/12 12:46 AM
-4

Thanks for double-checking. I would have believed it. About 85% of submissions are NOT human-stupidity. That counts as a promoter for human-stupidity? Now I double checked curious67. Also about 80% of recent submissions are NOT human-stupdity. Lesson learned. Always double-check feminist data and research. Now will x2c plese explain why all this gets into the spam filter? Or if you decided to liberate the article now, to allow your readers a chance to make more money?
/r/MensRights20/01/12 12:45 AM
-1

The link has already been posted at r/mr. In spite of the feminist slant, it got positive response. This was an attempt to address the feminist side of the coin, to advise women how to get empowered and earn more through their own merit. Utter failure, it seems.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 11:38 PM
-5

Thanks for the reply. a) it is not 99% from that page, maybe 40%, the rest is from NYT, Amazon, US News, Cato Institute, Youtube. And there are my own comments. The article is about Warren Farrell's work. So I mainly let Warren Farrell speak. I can not say it better then he does. Also it is one of the rare places where his 25 points are listed all at once. It took me hours of search on google to find the listing. 25 points are always mentioned but rarely listed. And it does not change the fact t…
/r/MensRights19/01/12 11:35 PM
2

It could easily be true. If it is invented, it is well invented. Women do this (see the false rape society). And other women diminish the criminal nature of such accusations. It is sort of fair play to get even and to level the playing field.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 11:26 AM
-1

Will the down-voters please speak up? Or just the normal downvote brigade. After all, honest advice to women in ways that is not offensive to men.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 11:22 AM
2

Pierce Harlan keeps saying that real rape victims are the staunchest defenders of the falsely accused and worst enemies of the false accusers. If you were really non-consensually rape-raped, then you might also be disgusted by the women who drink, drag an equally drunk man into the bed room, and cry rape by alcohol incapacitation. Sorry for the insensitive description of non-consensual rape-rape, but one has to differentiate true rape in the classic sense from 5-second-rape (consented, with luci…
/r/MensRights19/01/12 10:52 AM
4

right. But murdering men is more acceptable then raping women. And most women let themselves be raped when faced with death threats. So a man's life is worth less then a woman's rape which is worth less then a woman's life. And some people think this is not a men's rights issue?
/r/MensRights19/01/12 10:40 AM
1

Thanks for the votes. But additionally, this is begging for comments and actions.
/r/MensRights19/01/12 10:22 AM
3

One of the best indicators of the special vulnerability of men and boys is the frequency with which relatives and friends sought to disguise them in women’s clothing,” asserts Jones. “The African Rights report ‘Death, Despair and Defiance’ cites a number of examples of such procedures, which are reminiscent of similar practices followed in the Bosnian and Kosovan conflicts of the 1990s.”[5] Clearly, if females were specially targeted, males would not be donning female clothing. Yet, as the media…
/r/MensRights19/01/12 09:59 AM
3

Reposted with new title, after naive1000's kind comment You might want to change the title to include that a woman there said it, or you're just going to get downvoted without anyone reading it: "'It’s simple,' one woman here explained. 'When the men go out, they’re killed. The women are only raped.'" I admit my total social ineptness in formulating a topic in palatable ways. My original title got only downvotes, initially: Rape and murder of males deemed irrelevant. The press decries systematic…
/r/MensRights19/01/12 09:59 AM
2

One of the best indicators of the special vulnerability of men and boys is the frequency with which relatives and friends sought to disguise them in women’s clothing,” asserts Jones. “The African Rights report ‘Death, Despair and Defiance’ cites a number of examples of such procedures, which are reminiscent of similar practices followed in the Bosnian and Kosovan conflicts of the 1990s.”[5] Clearly, if females were specially targeted, males would not be donning female clothing. Yet, as the media…
/r/MensRights19/01/12 09:17 AM
2

You are way too kind. There is a wage gap and it is against men. For equal work under equal circumstances women usually make more. Mainly due to affirmative action. How women can earn more then men: 25 life choices to get higher pay
/r/MensRights16/01/12 10:16 AM
1

Sorry for the late answer. From 2 articles in Austria and Germany, it looks that the consensus is: 8% are obviously wrong, as you stated. Like they got caught by a surveillance camera. The remainder up to 40-60% looks clearly fishy, but the guy did not have a recording or other proof handy. The police inspectors, according to their experience, are pretty sure that the complaints are false. Note that due to the pussy pass, these seemingly false accusations still tend to give rise to legal proceed…
/r/MensRights03/01/12 09:14 AM
9

Very shocking. A proven rape liar weasles herself out by changing part of the story. She just confused an outside space with the inside of a closed bath room. Small confusion happens /sarcasm Like in Strauss Kahn case. It is proven she lied about half a dozen facts. Of course, this still does not prove she could not have been raped. Why isn't lying to police and court a crime? Even when the liar is a woman? Now We keep saying: For every rape case that has been proven wrong by camera evidence, th…
/r/MensRights25/12/11 09:11 PM
5

how many women already paid 450 Million divorce settlements? Also it is worth discussing the values of prenups. Also worth discussing what she contributed to his fortune and why she should get half. Including FUTURE earnings on his movies. If she had run a business together with him, maybe she deserves half. But just for hanging out with him?
/r/MensRights24/12/11 08:48 PM
1

it is not simple math. People who work longer hours make more dollars per hour. So if you work 10% more hours, you don't just make 10% more money. That is statistic data, you can try to find the reasons. Probably overtime workers are more motivated hard working people that advance more in life.
/r/MensRights11/12/11 12:26 PM
1

Right. The false rape society takes proven obvious cases. If you add the suspected cases, you get at 40- 60 % or more false rape accusations. http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/mens-rights-feminism/4-out-of-5-rape-accusations-are-false-austrian-head-of-vice-police http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/mens-rights-feminism/one-in-two-rape-accusations-are-false-strauss-kahn-presumed-guilty-jailed-slandered-without-due-process-escaped-others-are-not-so-lucky
/r/MensRights11/12/11 12:12 PM
5

This is so shocking. We already forgot that there is no due process in rape cases. If this were a normal case, it would be thrown out for lack of corroborating evidence. So, by normal legal understanding, there should be no jury deliberation at all, because there is no way to reach a verdict beyond reasonable doubt. Now in this unjust biased medieval environment, the jury instructions and prosecutor statements are an ADDITIONAL predicament. We think that most of feminist "progress" should be unc…
/r/MensRights10/12/11 11:17 PM
8

I have an article in the pipeline. Maybe I should speed it up. http://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL41F59E41BB5E9943 http://www.harrysnews.com/tgUnequalPayforEqualWork.htm?note http://angryharry.com/esWomendonotDeserveEqualPay.htm?note http://www.econtalk.org/archives/2011/11/baumeister_on_g.html Read Warren Farrell's book. He does not dare say, but there is a pay gap: women earn more for equal work then men. For example, women in the army or in coal mines get the same salary, but are shielded…
/r/MensRights10/12/11 10:45 PM
1

Violent crimes that leave long term physical damage. they don't get jail time. But looks, groping, etc is much worse /sarcasm
/r/MensRights29/11/11 02:56 PM
3

and women a socialized to always be "scarred for life" by such incidents. Feminists sometimes have to convince victims that they were assaulted or raped, so they would finally file complaints. so it goes both ways.
/r/MensRights29/11/11 02:55 PM
1

Great! I am happy to see that there are far more reasonable men's righters here then I thought. Agree completely As I said it here http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ms2km/woman_spared_jail_after_groping_airline_stewards/c33o2wp
/r/MensRights29/11/11 02:05 PM
1

Unfortunately, you are probably right. The woman does not need harder punishment, but only unjust hard punishment will lead to repeal of hard unjust punishment for men. Probably this is the only way. See my other comment here http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ms2km/woman_spared_jail_after_groping_airline_stewards/c33o2wp
/r/MensRights29/11/11 02:02 PM
8

We will probably be downvoted for our opinion that the woman got enough punishment, and that, for equal right's sake, men should equally get only a slap on the wrist. The woman's punishment is right, the punishment that men get is wrong. And we are very sad that r/mensrights consists mainly of sexually repressed men who want to mete out equally draconian unjustified punishment to women, instead of abolishing the persecution of male sexuality. She told police she had a drink problem and admitted …
/r/MensRights29/11/11 01:58 PM
15

If the mother is psycho, the child should be given to the father. If he wants to have the child. Most likely he is paying child support and can not see the child Another crazy anti-male decision.
/r/MensRights24/11/11 12:58 PM
1

A woman has 2 X chromosomes. A woman has a uterus. A woman can give birth to a child. A woman produces lots of estrogen on her own. Except for extreme cases
/r/MensRights13/10/11 05:37 AM
2

Well, to tell the truth. Men are the ones who do 95% of the rioting in soccer. Not too many female hooligans. Of course, if there are no men around to keep women in check, in the long run they might create trouble, too. Of course, we should recognize that in general the sexes are not the same. For the same reason, men are more common in political and economic leadership.
/r/MensRights21/09/11 09:18 AM
1

yes. But there are 2 questions a) why do they need to call this RAPE? See my other comment here. It was illicit sexual activity with a child. No forcible rape of a screaming resisting child. Not that I say it is right to do, but it is wrong to give it the wrong confusing name. Rather it is wrong to have diluted the meaning of the word "rape". b) how high should the punishment be? For that punishment, she could have killed 6 children, even with cruelty. And yes, as a person that does not want to …
/r/MensRights21/09/11 09:03 AM
1

You can downvote whatever you want me. But she did not RAPE the boy. She had inappropriate illicit sexual activities with a boy that was way too young. http://human-stupidity.com/irrationality/stupid-dogma/social-rules-habits/manipulate-language She did not RAPE. Not in the sense most of us understand rape. The meaning rape had 50 years ago. I am not saying what she did was right. But I keep saying that the feminists and politically correct crowd manipulates our language on purpose. Just call a …
/r/MensRights21/09/11 08:58 AM
1

There are serious legal prohibitions to do prenatal tests for genetic defects to avoid that genetically damaged fetuses get aborted. So the government encourages the birth of people damaged for life. I believe in Germany they have such reasoning. Anyway, it is absurd to call this female deaths. These are not females. And by the way, they get killed in the womb of females.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 09:08 PM
3

“The court should also have regard to whether the taking parent was fleeing from violence, whether the child objects to returning to Australia, and the best interests of the child,” Ms Macklin said. Gets my blood boiling. Who has to flee Australia from violence? Just lie about a man's violence, take his children away and still have him pay. And the mother can spend the money as she likes Reminds me of the Brazilian ghetto family that let the children hunger, and finally beat one to death, while …
/r/MensRights20/09/11 08:59 PM
5

This is pure insanity. A child gets abducted, (I believe mainly by foreign women) and the victim parent is supposed to pay support to the kidnapper? This is how far our family court system has taken us? If the kidnapper can not feed the child, s/he should not kidnap the kid. This is so wrong! Forcing a man (or a woman, whoever) to pay child support to a kidnapper. I have no words. All this BS about best interest of the child. The woman does whatever she wants, against the child's interest, and t…
/r/MensRights20/09/11 08:55 PM
3

Thanks. Where do all these downvotes come from? Amazing! Must be a downvote brigade.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 06:44 PM
1

perfectly right. You might actually be able to get your money back if you were too drunk But you can't get the guy to go to jail for 10 years for robbery and assault.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 09:56 AM
1

actually: forced slave labor. The government takes the money you earn and jails you if you stop earning money. All that to pay for a kid that the cheating woman fraudulently claimed was yours. And no way out, because government pursues you with all its might, beyond its borders.
/r/MensRights20/09/11 08:51 AM
3

Please send it. Why is it against reddit's policy? pornographic? illegal?
/r/MensRights19/09/11 09:20 PM
-2

actually, there are good reasons for white rights section. Google "polar bear hunting" (black flash mobs beating up whites) and other flash mobs that commit violence against whites while the politically correct press calls the perpetrators "youths". But this is not central to the men's rights issue. Just because you raised it.
/r/MensRights06/09/11 09:58 PM
6

Their template has been on Human-Stupidity.com's frontpage since it had about 98 votes. I wonder how many signed up on my page. Who else put up the advertising template or advertised this? Who is responsible for the action? Who will be running this men's rights section? What will be their policy? Will they selectively block certain men's rights issues? I have been promoting this because I have been kicked out of change.org (google "change.org sucks" with the quotes) and hate their feminist polic…
/r/MensRights06/09/11 09:53 PM
10

Their 30-year-old *victim** was arrested and kept in custody for 18 hours because the pair claimed they had been raped multiple times* Isn't this lovely? They call the man the victim. I had to read that twice to believe. Very laudable.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 09:38 AM
2

it does not matter if he did not rape He engaged in a threesome. This is reprehensible immoral sex, so he had it coming. He deserves it. [/end sarcasm]
/r/MensRights27/08/11 09:30 AM
3

absolutely. Details are here Get a lawyer before courting: 34 precautions before risking sex with a woman
/r/MensRights27/08/11 09:29 AM
1

she still got convicted for lying and similar crimes. Her acquittal is highly doubtful, to put it mildly. Compare this to Strauss Kahn who still is vilified after charges were dropped.
/r/MensRights27/08/11 08:55 AM
6

Are you saying women stand a chance to win Olympic wrestling medals? Judo too? Somehow I can not believe that. You probably dealt with the top talent girl in wrestling, maybe a masculine girl. And you were not a top wrestler. Would a girl score in the top 10 in the Nationals? Win an olympic Gold medal? What about boxing? Not a chance!! Soccer? don't they have similar lower body strength? Why can't they win in Tennis?
/r/MensRights06/08/11 09:24 PM
3

In Britain men can get up to 3 years in jail for testing their kid. Under the ridiculous precept that the child has rights to his genetic material. see "Mother’s baby. Father’s maybe." Mandatory DNA testing at birth can instate gender equality. Really I don't know about Ontario .... I would do the test anyway, secretly. Will the kid spill the secret? If not, take the risk and then decide if you tell others about the test. But YOU know already ...... Memorial Blood centers of Minnesota Parentage …
/r/MensRights05/08/11 10:06 PM
1

Because the government ordered them to do these proceedings. Title IX, an anti-sex discrimination law, is used to blatantly discriminate against men. Go figure
/r/MensRights22/07/11 12:45 PM
2

Women are automatically believed. So there always is an over 50% chance that they tell the truth. Ergo, an accused man is always a rapist. Get a lawyer before sex: 27 precautions before risking sex with a woman
/r/MensRights22/07/11 12:40 PM
1

Recording and all its problems are described here Get a lawyer before sex: 27 precautions before risking sex with a woman
/r/MensRights22/07/11 12:32 PM
3

Never forget that in such watered down sex offender lists, the TRUE sex offender violent rapists and tortures will be lost among the consensual adolescent fondlers, photo collectors and similar people that are way less dangerous then even our sample kids.
/r/MensRights22/07/11 10:33 AM
3

I first thought this was a joke. This can't be serious!?? I was kicked out by change.org, you guys probably will be kicked out too. Good luck protesting.
/r/MensRights20/07/11 08:00 AM
1

The ladies of “The Talk,” CBS’s answer to “The View,” have come under fire for laughing during a segment about Catherine Kieu, the California woman accused of cutting of her husband’s private part and disposing of it in a particularly gruesome way after he asked for a divorce. Accused? She confessed, admitted, and bravely defended her act. How come they are so careful? just because she is a woman?
/r/MensRights19/07/11 02:42 PM
0

In short: lots of real rapes and real domestic violence that are attributed to MEN are actually committed by black men. This is why the false rape society recommends to do take back the night marches in the inner city and not on campus. Statistically, black crime rate is much higher then white, quite certainly rape and domestic violence rates are higher. Anyone has the data to verify?
/r/MensRights19/07/11 01:35 PM
7

Paternity fraud is with criminal intent, with intent to deceive. (mens rea). It does not matter if mon is not sure whose baby it is. She knows she might be naming the wrong father, and intentionally hides this fact for her own selfish goals. A cuckolded man goes from no financial liability to a huge liability. He has NO responsibility, and suddenly he gets duped and is liable for child support, child care. In paternity fraud, a man gets "robbed" of money and effort that are only his. If he were …
/r/MensRights18/07/11 01:20 PM
1

isn't it the opposite? A man needs to only TOUCH or LOOK at a girl's clit and he will be jailed as a rapist. If he bit off the clit, all hell would break loose. This would be prosecuted as sexual assault, aggravated battery, sexual battery, hate crime against women, etc. Women would go on protest marches: my clit is mine. Clit removal would be an extreme crime with especially high penalties. Women would demand new laws, death penalty for clit removal. Clit removal is a special hate crime against…
/r/MensRights17/07/11 11:51 PM
4

All read the article. They are talking about being anally raped by dozens per day. Men whose anus is still seriously injured months and years after the event. They claim it happens to most men. And that it is even more under-reported by men. The Guardian is a pretty reliable source. Worth checking further. Worth also seeing the comments by feminists who are so worried about 5 second date rapes and too drunk to consent but went willingly to the room and to bed rape. "International human rights la…
/r/MensRights17/07/11 04:04 PM
6

re-gendered: Man cuts off wife's breast and super-glued her vagina. Don't downvote! This is not misogyny. It is just re-gendering of what happened in the TV talk show. I swear! I did not invent this!
/r/MensRights17/07/11 12:20 PM
1

Great article. Must read!!
/r/MensRights16/07/11 10:10 PM
2

It would be ok for political correctness if she let herself be dominated by a Lesbian Domme. Of course, let oneself be dominated by a man, ..... She, can , of course, still file sexual abuse and rape charges. Even if she signed a notarized consent. She can allege she withdrew consent. Can you also furnish the link to where you found this?
/r/MensRights16/07/11 03:37 PM
0

Gender is socially constructed. Genders are the same. Thus menstruation is socially constructed. Menstruation and PMA were invented by the evil patriarchy. Milk also reduces rape tendencies in men. Does anyone have the link to a true Milk Ad to verify?
/r/MensRights15/07/11 11:51 AM
1

Reading the sneering comments against the book, makes me want to read the book! The Mystery Method: How to Get Beautiful Women Into Bed He tells readers, "If you're undressing her and she says, ‘We should stop,' just agree with her... and then keep going. ‘I know, baby,' you reply as you continue to undress her. ‘We should stop'" (p. 202). Here, Mystery (2007) again suggests ignoring verbal communication entirely, implying that, unless physical force is used to stop the behavior, the woman is co…
/r/MensRights15/07/11 10:40 AM
1

The man can remain acting as a father towards the child. If he wants to do so. Strangely, women all the time LOCK OUT fathers, true or cuckold fathers, from their children. Nobody is worried about "punishing" the child. Now, obviously the man can stop PAYING to the cheating lying MOM. The child does not need to know about this. He acts as emotional father, but not as mom's ATM machine. So simple. Why does the law do the opposite? This is the only time in law where the court forces you to pay a f…
/r/MensRights13/07/11 09:37 AM
2

that really happens? without marriage, adoption, etc? please give links. That is terrible. You are obliged to mistreat the children? Or else you get into payment obligation? No good deed goes unpunished!!!
/r/MensRights11/07/11 01:44 PM
5

Now we get to the real topic. Of course. You have been duped. Why can't you run away from it? Great. Victim blaming. He trusted his wife. Now he has to pay up. Should not have been so dumb. Actually, the opposite of our feminist legal system is right. The man has absolutely no LEGAL financial obligation, but should have the right to continue an affective father role. Not as it is: he has to pay but can be locked out. Absurd.
/r/MensRights11/07/11 01:43 PM
3

So it seems like once you accept responsibility for a child you are legally recognized as a parent regardless of actual paternity. And frankly I'm okay with that, you shouldn't be able to abandon children you are raising. It never ceases to amaze me how men lap up feminist brain washing. Why can't you abandon a kid you are raising because you were defrauded? a) it still has a mom b) may the true father come forward and raise it. c) while at that, may the true father and the cheating lying mom re…
/r/MensRights11/07/11 07:35 AM
1

I would agree with you, if rape was still classic forcible rape. But feminist re-definition of our language has created 20 types of rape, including 5 second rape, rape by fraud, consensual rape of your underage 17 year old girlfriend, etc. Paternity Fraud is Rape! Paternity Rape is worse than Rape-Rape. : consider that you get jailed for not paying to your cheating fraudulent wife for decades. This is government sanctioned rape, even literally, while you are in jail. Worse then slavery, if you d…
/r/MensRights11/07/11 07:30 AM
1

DNA paternity testing can be performed profitably for 10$, it should be used much more frequently. Do you have a link for that? I suspect it is true but have found no proof for it. Feminsts are probably actively preventing the true price from becoming known. How much does it cost for the US government to buy 10 Million paternity tests? I was shocked when MD and owner of a chain of clinics told me, he gets medical tests for 90 cents that we normal people pay 80 dollars for. $ 10 paternity tests w…
/r/MensRights11/07/11 07:18 AM
6

I am sure, Lorena Bobbit certainly joked about cutting John's dick off ............. There are certain jokes that are quite tasteless. Men have been arrested or dismissed for leering and looking. Loud voice, screaming, swear words are domestic violence. Threatening to stab is just a harmless joke. Until you really cheat ......... No, it was a joke. She will not stab you. She will cut your dick off .....
/r/MensRights10/07/11 07:44 PM
2

Took them a long time, but this is a nice article. Of course, they still give too much attention to his wife and the judge's position. But a good start. Can't men's right proponents demand the surveillance videos, under some freedom of information act? That would become an icon for the father's right movement. A martyr. If he were a Muslim, he would deserve his 49 virgins in heaven! Thomas Ball was so lucky he did not get "saved" by the extinguisher wielding policeman and spend a few months of t…
/r/MensRights10/07/11 06:10 PM
5

There is no divorce for men. After divorce he pays more then while he was married. He has more obligations then ever. He just has no rights. No sex, no seeing the children. No use of his house. But paying more then ever to his wife.
/r/MensRights10/07/11 05:57 PM
3

funny. Empowered women never are able to support their children? Even if they are highly paid executives. What a funny logic. I have seen lots of poor mothers raise their children with dignity.
/r/MensRights10/07/11 07:22 AM
2

what about empowered women themselves paying for the child of their choice? Nobody asks if the child needs more resources or if mom can get enough resources. Nobody is satisfied with basic resources in case father has lots of resources.
/r/MensRights10/07/11 07:15 AM
4

just that rape is punished by decades in jail, even if there is no proof. paternity fraud is actually REWARDED, before detection protected by law against detection (prohibition against DNA tests without women's consent) impunity after detection. No thought of only returning the embezzled money rewarded after detection. Usually the man has to continue paying after detection of the fraud. So, the law does not think paternity fraud is awful
/r/MensRights02/07/11 10:13 PM
2

If you are opposed to feminist dilution of rape (5 second rape, consensual sex with 17 year old girl friend rape, consented but blamed alcohol rape, etc), then we are in agreement on some major issues. Actually, there are men committing suicide, or being raped and beaten in debtor's prison. Anyone can help me regarding reactions of men finding out they have been duped for 20 years by paternity rape/fraud? Murder, suicide, profound depression? Anyone has details? Women don't die from rape itself.…
/r/MensRights02/07/11 06:56 PM
1

Maybe a exaggerated use of words. Feminists use extreme wording to get their point across. The more interesting point is that paternity fraud could be added to the 24 types of rape feminists invented. Paternity rape is more catchy and uses feminist vocabulary. Everything is rape ......
/r/MensRights02/07/11 06:41 PM
3

From the article The cuckold victim gets raped by government, who forces him to pay for the cuckold child to the cheating mom. The mighty government takes the cuckold victim’s money by force, under the threat of prison, often even after he has proven not to be the father. Do you understand? Unjustly robbed and raped by dictatorial government, for life. The paternity rape victim gets raped, day by day, by a woman he trusts, by a woman that knows (or suspects) that her husband is not responsible f…
/r/MensRights02/07/11 05:51 PM
2

The US legal system takes perjury very seriously. Bill Clinton was in trouble for his lies ("never had sex with this woman"), not so much for what he did. Accusing and destroying a man is not a real problem. But perjury to a grand jury, that is serious. And it does not matter if it is about a minor side issue. Perjury is perjury.
/r/MensRights02/07/11 10:17 AM
1

Amen! Do you want to guest-post this to Human-Stupidity.com? One of the inmalafide writings you cited was written by myself.
/r/MensRights26/06/11 12:46 AM
3

Why is this a men's rights issue? it is a human rights issue, the right to pursue happiness if someone wanted to frame the guy, you could be certain that a detective could have probably found proof to frame him on indecent touching or grooming. That if she really remained a virgin and was not raped by him (you know sex with a minor is rape!) it is really a valid question if a 16 year old is mature enough to marry of course, marriage might be better then promiscuous sex double standard: there mig…
/r/MensRights25/06/11 11:02 AM
1

The "club" story is disgusting and plays right into feminist "all men are rapist" stories. Most likely untrue, a girl with family would not be clubbed over the head by a stone age man who wants sex. The fact that a man gives EVERYTHING to get sex from a young girl, true.
/r/MensRights25/06/11 10:40 AM
4

It is sad that men's rights is worried about measuring words. The title is too extremist for most people here. Professors get ruined because of accusations the touched a student's hair and complimented on it. Or because a professor argued that false rape accusations are frequent, and thus created a hostile environment. And people here probably downvote because I use the word cry-baby. Men get their legs blown off in Afghanistan and buried in the twin tower (without complaining). At the same time…
/r/MensRights23/06/11 12:59 PM
1

DHS: Department of Human-Stupidity? No A class action lawsuit was filed Friday against the Oklahoma Department of Human Services. Attorney Bob Robinson filed the lawsuit alleging DHS has been overcharging some dads for child support.
/r/MensRights23/06/11 12:50 PM
1

Not all false rape charges are the same It seems she did not point her finger at someone. It seems she did not try to hurt a man. It seems she just was a stupid broad who thought out some excuse, and was too dumb to think it to the end, that police will thoroughly investigate. So she was probably unaware police would waste lots of resources and she would get caught. Of course, it is sad to have such a dumb person to be a future lawyer. Or maybe this is why she flunked. In my view, an "anonymous"…
/r/MensRights22/06/11 09:50 AM
1

1) feminists defend women killing husbands or lopping off dicks understandable (battered women syndrome) 2) these women have the chance to simply leave and start a new life. 3) the men in question are ruined, with absolutely no chance to escape. They are indentured wage slaves for life. Not even bankrupcy is an option. Not even fleeing the country is an option. Police finds them and puts them in jail. All this because of a) your wife b) feminist laws 4) isn't it understandable if you go berserk …
/r/MensRights21/06/11 08:11 AM
2

I got your point. Whites, such as men, are historically privileged and thus unprotected classes (they say ....) Now fashion really is geared towards a certain type of people. So it is fairly legit that a group of blacks makes fashion that appeals to blacks. Now, of course, for whites by whites still would be hard to swallow for most people. You can see in theoZoph, the knee jerk reaction (racist, white power) of politically correct anti racists. Very similar to fanatic feminists. You misogynist!…
/r/MensRights20/06/11 05:45 PM
0

from what I remember he said he slapped her and accidentally something happened to make her bleed. It is not a remote possibility. If you slap the face lightly and the person bites herself in the mouth. Things like these happen. If he was found not guilty in today's atmosphere, he really is not guilty. One little accident in a few years, looks pretty normal. And, if in doubt for the accused.
/r/MensRights20/06/11 02:30 PM
5

Old news. Why has it not been updated? Believe me, if "feminism" were flagged by a spell check, Microsoft would to an emergency upgrade before feminists would call for a boycott and promote google office products.
/r/MensRights20/06/11 10:28 AM
1

Women promoting male crime and violence! Women's true nature, by their genetic pre-disposition. They want to rich bad guy, not the honest boring accountant. Much less the office boy or honest hard working street cleaner.
/r/MensRights20/06/11 10:25 AM
10

This is meant to be provocative, and provoke thoughts, but has appropriate disclaimers. Anyone bothers to post it to 2x feminists or WTF? Basic topic is that men talk a lot, see what is happening, but some verbal reaction is not enough against totally life destructing fascist legal monster created by feminist doctrine. While women create legal monsters about objectifying gazes, innuendo at work place that create traumatic hostile experiences, men just sit around and chat at r/mensrights while me…
/r/MensRights20/06/11 10:19 AM
3

I have suggested something similar: Legal right to renounce child support empowers women, increases birth rates
/r/MensRights19/06/11 07:05 AM
2

"White lie" was google's suggestion. But to translate more literally "Such accusations are often an emergency lie/ emergency excuse / self serving lie/ because unprotected sex has happened after a party ......." So it meant a lie not to protect another person but rather to protect the liar herself ........... „Auch sind solche Anzeigen nicht selten eine Notlüge, weil nach einem Fest oder Discobesuch
/r/MensRights17/06/11 11:24 PM
1

great quote, and very befitting. Actually, philosopher Peter Singer suggests that abortion rights should extend to the first month of life of the baby. Amazingly, it is the same guy who favors animal rights and is a vegetarian. It would go too far to show why all this seeming contradiction actually has a deep logic to it. http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/religion/richard-singer-utilitarianism-instead-sexually-obsessed-religious-morality One point is that very late term abortion is almost …
/r/MensRights17/06/11 04:57 PM
1

See below an example of how unpleasant research gets culled. Of course, repressing the truth always has its side effects. Like not using the right methods to avoid child killing. From the article: The overwhelming share of mothers in such situations do nothing so heinous as killing their babies, but one provocative 1999 study argued that postpartum depression (PPD) is an adaptive strategy to achieve the same genetic culling by different means. Anthropologist Edward Hagen, of the University of Ca…
/r/MensRights17/06/11 04:50 PM
1

actually, in most places I see 40% figures (2 out of 5), and the official feminist version is probably closer to 2% (1 out of 50) Do you have credible sources supporting the 4 out of 5 figures? Of course, there is the other part, that most "true rapes" are not really "real rape-rape" but rather drunk consensual date rape and other less traumatic experiences.
/r/MensRights17/06/11 04:32 PM
1

Hard data should come from reliable sources. A major newspaper interviewing a high ranking police officer is a pretty reliable source. I saw a similar statement at some blog, I think it was inspector gadget blog. I did not find that blog citing an authority, so this was not enough proof. So the word "freak" refers to the credibility of the evidence. Any blog can make conclusions based on well supported evidence. The False Rape Society, for example, always cites major press organs or court decisi…
/r/MensRights17/06/11 04:12 PM
1

Anyone ever read about Sweden? Guess these Swedes are not feminists. (In Sweden, men get arrested for procuring prostitutes) Who does all the panic and lies about trafficking? Who makes the restrictive laws? who makes raids to "save" girls from a profession they choose? http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/prostitution/feminist-arguments-against-prostitution-dismantled Anyone read about the age of consent getting lifted to 21 in Holland? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostitution_in_the_Nether…
/r/MensRights17/06/11 11:53 AM
3

anyone cares to post this to a feminist blog? It is a major newspaper, so it is worth them commenting!
/r/MensRights17/06/11 04:38 AM
1

One can't take of their gender, their skin or their faith. One can take off their Rolex and put their cash in their money belt. One can drink non-alcoholic drinks, behave modestly, not lead men on, and dress modestly, and not walk with the worst jerks into the worst neighborhood (the jerk's bed room).
/r/MensRights15/06/11 02:45 AM
3

most of the analogies are pretty good. But there is more: men get kicks out of flashing their Porsche, their Armani suit and wads of cash. All this is also an aphrodisiac for women, just as slutty dress turns on men. The analogy is almost perfect. In the case of the $ 2000 for the homeless, YOU would have to prove, beyond reasonable doubt, that the money he has is yours, and that he took it, and that you did not give it away. Of course, you could allege you were drunk. That still would just requ…
/r/MensRights14/06/11 09:08 PM
6

nothing excuses rape or robbery. But if you flash huge amounts of cash in the worst neighborhood at night, you are asking for it. It still is a crime, but you could, most likely, have avoided it. With rape, the problem is not so much the slutty clothes, but especially drunkenness.
/r/MensRights14/06/11 08:31 PM
1

Just in case if there is any doubt: this is a spoof regarding women's slut walks who think they can walk around half naked and drunk and still have no resposibility for getting hit on or raped (that would be victim blaming)
/r/MensRights14/06/11 07:37 PM
-17

He should have killed the wife only. Certainly the judge would have mercy on him and let him go, because the children need a father (/end sarcasm) Joke aside, murder is always wrong, but when divorce courts ruin a man's life, take most of his money and keep him away from his beloved children, it can make the more borderline instable man snap. Those who just got destroyed but still keep things under control can understand. Again, no justification for murder, much less for murdering the children. …
/r/MensRights14/06/11 02:18 AM
1

so does getting seriously beaten by a bully. Or by a robber. Or getting run over by a car. Or being prevented from seeing your kids. Or getting a restraining order to stay away from your own home. Rape is traumatic. So are many other crimes. Having-enthusiastic-sex-while-tipsy-and-drunk-rape is probably a little shocking once you wake up in the morning but probably less traumatic then being threatened by neighborhood gangs and intimidated regularly. Nobody says rape is not bad. It only says it i…
/r/MensRights14/06/11 02:03 AM
0

Thank you. I am already preparing for the vigilante death squads taking revenge. We had promised some extremist masculist provocation. We still think this is much more civilized then the SCUM manifesto. Again, I appreciate a few up votes. Up votes meaning: worth discussing. Does not need to mean: totally agree. Feminists might get so incensed that they might upvote this as a terrible negative example.
/r/MensRights14/06/11 01:58 AM
2

So does getting beat up by your neighborhood gang. Everyone seems to understand that the article says rape is ok. It just says it is not as exceptionally terrible as people make it. Specifically due to modern society. It sure presses some buttons, never got 10 replies in 15 minutes. I appreciate a few upvotes so the discussion can be continued. As long as you agree with any of the points, or think it is worth discussing, that is good enough.
/r/MensRights14/06/11 01:50 AM
-2

This is meant to be provocative and to provoke discussion. You may disagree with many points. Hopefully you find a few points you can agree on. Maybe it is equivalent to serious toilet dunking to the level of waterboarding and almost drowning. But is it as bad as murder or disfiguration by acid or burns in the face? It also makes the point that modern technology and modern mores made rape less catastrophic then 100 or 1000 years ago.
/r/MensRights14/06/11 01:45 AM
0

so does being beaten up, choked to unconsciousness. The article does not say rape is good, it just says it is not as terrible as it is treated now. Would you rather be coerced and forced to submission, or run over by a car and spend the rest of your life paralyzed in bed? So why is rape considered worse then live long mutilation?
/r/MensRights14/06/11 01:39 AM
-3

This is meant to push some buttons in feminists. They will claim that it is rape apology. But it just questions why rape is so much worse then other crimes and why rape should warrant loss of due process and presumption of innocence. Rape had more much serious consequences in the past when virginity was prized very highly and when a woman had no other choice but to carry a pregnancy to term in case she got pregnant due to rape, and when there was no easy way to find out if a child was fathered b…
/r/MensRights14/06/11 01:33 AM
3

You mentioned the most important point only at the very end: The big mistake of this article, from my point of view, is that it assumes men and women want the same things out of a partner and both deal with the issue of getting sex exactly the same. They obviously don't and that is why the article fails in its analysis.
/r/MensRights12/06/11 11:03 PM
5

Feminists have already criminalized everything men tend to do. Also powerful older men clearly are more interested in dalliances then women. No women is interested in having sex with 3 men per day. Nor does she need to take initiatives to hit on everyone. And additionally, seems women are forgiven more easily and they know how to cheat much better. See how they even manage to have a kid from someone else and hide that for 20 years. That is female talent to hide their trysts. Do you think Hillary…
/r/MensRights12/06/11 09:30 PM
4

Even the birth control fraud issue can be solved without stringent incarceration, by mandatory DNA tests. So a man loses maximum 9 months of time and some cash taking care of a pregnant wife. A radical masculinist, of course, would demand full restitution and punitive damage awards and some jail. It should be the woman's duty to inform that paternity is uncertain, to avoid later punishment. To remain extreme masculist in our demands.
/r/MensRights11/06/11 11:42 AM
4

Well said. Come over and comment on the human-stupidity.com blog! And the males that think we're radical? silly little boys that need to be quiet and LEARN, because from what I see, they have NO CLUE about the reality of either feminism or women. This weak type of MRA does nothing but debate the fine points of bullshit, in a respectful way, so as not to apportion blame.
/r/MensRights11/06/11 11:33 AM
6

The article is 30% serious. The tongue in cheek is not so much about the issues, but about the anti-libertarian attitude of demanding further laws and incarceration. We think that demanding more laws and more incarceration is not really a serious goal in itself but a bargaining chip to get rid of existing perverted laws. Also a method to become conscious of the absurdity of the existing laws. Personally I think the idea of inversion of proof and presumption of female guilt in birth control lie c…
/r/MensRights11/06/11 11:32 AM
3

absolutely. By the law in the US and many other countries this is child pornography rape or battery or sexual assault Do you remember the 6 year old boy arrested for sexual assault and similar stories? Certainly a double standard. Human-Stupidity.com rails against these sex laws and would rather have them scrapped. But, as long as they exist, they should not be applied selectively. This probably is a prank, and probably should be dealt with outside regular police and justice system (provided tha…
/r/MensRights03/06/11 10:56 PM
4

They seem to be very very relevant in mis-educating women, coming up with new repressive policies, and with coming up with fake research data to justify such policies.
/r/MensRights01/06/11 01:04 AM
4

Am I getting this right? Women should not make any effort to please a man sexually. Wives can refuse sex at any time and as long as they want. For example on wedding nights. Men are not supposed to search sex elsewhere, not with the secretary, the neighbor, nor with a prostitute? Men are supposed to sacrifice themselves and work dangerous jobs so they can make money to support the sex refusing wife? Isn't there some injustice?? You don't want to give me sex? Ok, I don't pay you support and I wil…
/r/MensRights01/06/11 01:03 AM
27

the guy was 30, the woman in her 55. Is he a pervert? Who stares at a woman 25 years older then himself? Maybe it was all her imagination. Was there proof? Video recording? All her own testimony?
/r/MensRights24/05/11 07:08 PM
1

Thanks for an open minded attitude. Maybe you change your mind if you start reading about the child porn witch hunt http://human-stupidity.com/irrationality/stupid-dogma/child-porn-witch-hunt The problem is it is so taboo it must not even be discussed. And there are many things we think repulsive, but it does not mean that people need to be locked up for 25 years. Look at pregnant women drinking alcohol or women and men feeding their fat kids at McDonalds. Or I show that child killing, child tor…
/r/MensRights24/05/11 06:21 PM
4

one major split is between sex positive, libertarian on the one side (theantifeminist.com, Human-Stupidity.com, Jay Hammers), and conservative fathers who want to jail men for a decade for looking at pictures of 22 year old girls in pony tails that look like they are 17. The fathers right feminists threaten the sex positive ones, even with violence. I had posts here blocked that were writing about ACADEMIC RESEARCH in peer reviewed journals, showing that prohibition of child porn increases child…
/r/MensRights24/05/11 03:46 PM
6

This is a sex positive blog by sex positive feminists. One blogger runs a porn site where she masturbates and has sex. It is possible that they are for lower age of consent of both boys and girls. But it is not clear. I also posted, we will see what will be published
/r/MensRights23/05/11 11:39 AM
3

Maybe we try counter-examples, that is easier: DNA tests to get equality in paternal certainty that they are the parent: women invented perverted logic that the child has the right to its own genetic material and thus men need to be jailed in Britain for testing their own offpring without the offspring's consent (well, represented by mother) any more??
/r/MensRights22/05/11 04:27 PM
1

Consent, rape & minors. What is consent to sex? http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality/consent-rape-minors-what-is-consent http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality/when-rape-is-not-rape
/r/MensRights22/05/11 04:22 PM
0

I don't think a 24 year old who sleeps with someone below the age of consent (16 in my state) deserves the same consideration... regardless of their gender. I think that any obese minor should be prevented from eating junk food or doing sedentary computer games. Still, no 10 year jail terms for those adults that help minors to destroy their health for good. Now why do you think the government should hunt down such men and punish them harder then violent street robbers to protect the adolescent f…
/r/MensRights22/05/11 02:50 PM
3

please find it and let me know! This is the type I am especially interested. Lies, deception, unconsciousness, scientific dishonesty, etc. Background analysis ... Post a comment at human-stupidity.com that is the easiest way to communicate with me.
/r/MensRights20/05/11 07:39 PM
2

I have to hide. I am much worse off then the average MRA supporter. I am a rape apologist (think men should have presumption of innocence and due process according to Magna Carta and most constitutions) pedophile apologist (thoughts should be free, and laws and actions upon thoughts should be freely discussed and freely researched in academics. In other words, even if all prohibitions remain, we should be free to question them and to scientifically research them) child rape, child pornography ap…
/r/MensRights20/05/11 01:07 PM
2

especially if murder is committed by a woman, with long term planning. Then it is self defense, the battered woman syndrome.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 11:32 PM
2

asking a 17 year old if there is a difference between a stranger forcing her to have sex or her boyfriend making love when she invites him. Both are rape. She knows the difference, the law does not. If a lightly drunk woman has sex with a piss drunk man, he is a rapist. If a woman invites you to sex, and says "stop" and you continue for 5 seconds, you committed a 5-second-rape. This is the same as raping someone in a dark alley at night? If you take 5 dollars from your mom's purse, or if you rob…
/r/MensRights19/05/11 11:30 PM
2

I keep writing and saying this over and over and get blasted for it. Or kicked out from sites. If the girl is 17, under the age of consent, then it is the same if you make love, if she attacks you and ravishes you, or if you put a knife at her throat, drag her into the forest and rape her while she is kicking and screaming. All is rape. Actually, fondling and kissing a 17 year old without undressing her also is rape.
/r/MensRights19/05/11 11:27 PM
10

Should not women have a HIGHER pension age? They live a few years longer. So they should have the same number of years of pension. They should retire a few years later. Why should men have 5 years of retirement and women have like 15 years of retirement?
/r/MensRights18/05/11 09:19 PM
1

It is not wrong with us. wrong are the feminists. Maybe you have not read this t/mensrights enought to see these stories. It starts with Lorena Bobbitt who sliced off her husbands dick and demanded and got an excuse for him being a insensitive womanizer. http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/mens-rights-feminism/lorena-bobbit-forgives-her-husband
/r/MensRights18/05/11 09:28 AM
1

you answered what I wanted to answer. No woman does that, if not driven to despair and trauma by male abusers. He was abusive, her prior boy friend was abusive, a therapist discovered that her step dad abused her as a child. Maybe in prior incarnations she was abused too (I am making this up, but feminists are even better at this)
/r/MensRights18/05/11 09:25 AM
2

Excerpts from the article: Dominique Strauss-Kahn, IMF Managing Director and French presidential candidate accused of rape. As the feminist dominated press is scared to even think that the rape accusations are false, Human-Stupidity has to speak up. The story is very strange, and dominated by clear mistakes committed by accuser. A five star hotel maid trespasses into a naked client’s room? Unforgivable. 5 Star hotel ecurity lets a rapist check out? The maid is not trained to instantly report cri…
/r/MensRights15/05/11 07:51 PM
-1

the main point of the post is the repression of free speech and free opinion. One MUST be favorable to homosexuality. It is taboo to be the slightest against homosexuality in any way whatsoever. Or else it constitutes the crime of homophobia. Nowadays it is all right to feminize boys I think a father should have the right to make his boy manly, a real man, ....... In this context the right of a father to try to steer his son towards being a masculine heterosexual In the fairly rare case that the…
/r/MensRights15/05/11 12:19 AM
1

So if you say, you would be unhappy if your son were gay, and you will try to educate him to be an upstanding heterosexual: arrest, off to court, probable jail term. A funny story: Two male friends ate at a steak house in Brazil. The steak house had a Valentines special for couples. The waiter refused the special rate because it was meant for male-female couples. It took only 5 seconds to explain to the manager the consequences if they called police for homophobia. He instantly conceded the disc…
/r/MensRights14/05/11 03:35 PM
8

A related topic in the post: It is interesting to note that Brazil’s and Rio’s officials fought to win the title "best gay destination in the world" but are vigorously opposed to "sexual tourism", meaning heterosexual males in search of sex with Brazilian women.
/r/MensRights14/05/11 03:29 PM
0

Right. But things are worse. Not only if you are imprudent and don't lock up your house well enough. Which already entitles your insurance not to pay you, though police still would investigate and prosecute. You may get so drunk that you invite a guy into your house, and give him your ipad as a present. The next day you are sorry and accuse him of robbery. He should have known that you were drunk and were not serious about your present. But it certainly would not be robbery. I read the comments …
/r/MensRights14/05/11 09:15 AM
-2

Its women who behave imprudently. And men who get blamed for it. Furthermore I dont see how this post is related to MensRights. All men get blanket accusations. And to improve on the example: the Rolex wearer was so drunk that he gave his Rolex as a present to a friend at the bar. The next morning he was sorry for what he did and accused his friend of robbery.
/r/MensRights14/05/11 09:07 AM
1

actually pretty easy to accidentally acquire it. Any provocatively dressed semi nude 17 year olds will do. Or any older then 18 girl without proof of age nude or in explicit action. But in her case, she probably wanted to make SURE she got SERIOUS child porn. I must say I don't know how to easily get that. Nor am I willing to try and check. Old movies like "Blue Lagoon", though technically child porn, probably would not lead to an indictment, nor your collection of now illegal page 3 girls from …
/r/MensRights13/05/11 09:35 PM
1

right, page is gone. Is not linked to from the front page either. Probably Pierce Harlan underestimated the power of Jackson Katz
/r/MensRights13/05/11 09:30 PM
0

please post about this case on Human-Stupidity http://human-stupidity.com/irrationality/stupid-dogma/child-porn-witch-hunt
/r/MensRights13/05/11 08:56 PM
1

aren't feminists always fighting for power? Always fighting for special treatment? Not just fighting for it, they already achieved it: the law clearly enforces unequal privileges for women. The title could have been chosen better to say: Women should be punished harsher then men There is an element of provocation: demand the opposite of what everyone else demands, and finding good reasons to justify it.
/r/MensRights12/05/11 07:37 AM
-1

many women are perfectly able to support a baby's minimum needs without government and without a husband. So in most cases, if the minor did not pay, government still would not have to pay support. But sure, there is some validity to your point.
/r/MensRights11/05/11 10:27 PM
3

The article only compares boys and girls and pretty much refrains from suggesting absolute punishments. So definitely agree with you, punishments should be reduced, not increased. And
/r/MensRights11/05/11 10:22 PM
0

well, that is the problem.
/r/MensRights11/05/11 10:21 PM
1

This is absolutely incredible. What kind of academia do we have? How can this be? One idiot citing another idiot, and thus citing that the consensus is 2% false rape claim? Nobody ever looks at the actual data? Is this feminist research? Legal research? Never seen anything as shoddy. Well, except for trafficking data, etc. TrollKing, how do you find all these things? Do you want to contribute to Human-Stupidity.com? This is a prime example of Human-Stupidity in research!
/r/MensRights06/05/11 06:49 AM
1

it is worse then he-said she-said. she has been proven to lie, expert witnesses say her version of the bruises can not fit her story, and the funnly photos of bruises she had on her laptop. I don't understand the miracle that they actually checked the victim's laptop.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 04:54 PM
-1

Her word is proof enough. She is believed. If they think her word is right, then he goes to jail anyway. At least to put him in jail for a few months. See the Kachelmann case I posted here again, today. or at http://human-stupidity.com If it's her word against yours they can't put you in jail. Proof is needed.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 01:49 PM
-1

feminists are not worried about trafficking. All trafficking could be solved by giving 2 year work visa to Russian, Brazilian, African prostitutes. And not by pushing prostitution into illegality. Furthermore, if you read here more often, trafficking is a feminist lie, no matter how hard they search, they don't find prostitutes working against their will. Certainly not tens of thousands, as they claim.
/r/MensRights05/05/11 01:47 PM
5

"Victim" inisted on lies, repeatedly, until proven wrong by data on her own laptop. Only 2 bruises as evidence. Expert witnesses clearly state that bruises are inconsistent with her description of the alleged rape. Victim's computer has photos of bruises, where it seems she was training how to self inflict them. The serious press in Germany ("Der Spiegel", "Die Zeit") clearly are in favor of the accused. Not because they are anti-feminist, but because to intelligent people it is clear he is trea…
/r/MensRights05/05/11 07:59 AM
1

Feminism: wanting equality only where it suits them. Bad parts of feminism: what is Sweden doing for your rights if a woman accuses you of rape? why does Sweden do the highest rape rate of most civilized countries? a) Swedes are violent rapists by nature? b) there is something wrong about rape laws and court practices in Sweden? what is Sweden doing for your right to have consensual sex with an adult for money without others meddling in your bed room? How is Sweden forcing women into parliament …
/r/MensRights05/05/11 07:26 AM
3

Right. Absolutely no equality. Now, most men here seem to think both men and women should be jailed even more. And are willing to attack me, block me, kick me out if I suggest a more libertarian method: keep government out of adolescent sexuality except in extreme cases (real children), and true non-consent (forcible rape). In other words, don't waste government money to jail neither men nor women for sex with post-pubertal people in child-bearing age. I keep hammering home: if someone thinks ad…
/r/MensRights03/05/11 08:19 AM
6

I wonder how much the lawyers are getting.
/r/MensRights03/05/11 07:59 AM
3

From an evolutionary point of view it looks obvious that men have much more to win from being championship athletes then women. Top athletes get hundred of groupies, and the top scoring men are athletes like Magic Johnson, Wilt Chamberlain, etc. It is a well known fact that adolescent and young adult men are reckless drivers and take life threatening risks in order to out-compete other men and thus are the most attractive to women. It is also known that, in evolutionary times, in the EEA (enviro…
/r/MensRights02/05/11 10:18 AM
2

Human-Stupidity made this point at Consult a lawyer before playing doctor. Perverse sex laws traumatize children Toddlers need mandatory classes in stupid adult sex laws in kindergarten. How would a 6 year old know that consensual play with his friends is a felony? How would he know that photographing himself nude, or his friends, is terrible child pornography and child abuse? /end_sarcasm http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality/6-year-old-charged-with-sexual-assault-for-consen…
/r/MensRights01/05/11 11:07 PM
2

Upvoted! Hard data about the payment gap. Men and women don't have the same employment histories. But women getting only 60% the salary of men: Now someone should analyze the data if women with the same hours of work and with the same time in the company get the same pay. Or if men earn a lot more after 3-5 years in the company.
/r/MensRights25/04/11 05:41 AM
2

people vote for them. Are they wrong? I like to save the comics to illustrate my articles in the future
/r/MensRights25/04/11 05:17 AM
2

Anyone has a link to the movie collection; Women slapping men (I think it is in some men's rights site) men slapping women, cited here, that I have never seen yet?
/r/MensRights24/04/11 05:50 PM
4

I am talking of a woman that honestly wants a child. Not a gold digger. Most women know which men they want a child from. They always find some unattractive guy to bang her up, even attractive guys, but rarely someone willing to have a baby with her. Read women's magazine about male fear of commitment! And yes, even with this option, some women will want to cheat. I am talking about honest, serious women, who could have an option. I think this really could lead to the higher birth rate that poli…
/r/MensRights23/04/11 02:39 PM
6

I know hundreds of poor mothers that supported their child fully. If the father died, is in jail, is unknown, or is dirt poor, then this is the only way how to do it. If she is proud, she can pay herself too. And if she makes US$ 5000 a month and up, she can easily do it. I don't see the problem.
/r/MensRights23/04/11 02:36 PM
2

ever heard of birth control and abortion? For about 50 years, sex does not necessarily lead to babies in our society. I know women who tried to get pregnant and did not succeed. Omitting those that are infertile, for fertil women the man can watch his sperm, wash his condoms out before discarding, ...... Plenty of older less attractive women who want a baby from certain guys and these guys are not willing to be daddies, and some of them take sufficent care that even sperm theft es near impossibl…
/r/MensRights23/04/11 02:34 PM
2

to have sex with them or to actually pay for a baby for 20 years?
/r/MensRights23/04/11 01:15 PM
0

is it just my stupidity, or does the writer not have a very firm command of the English language? I don't really get her point.
/r/MensRights23/04/11 10:29 AM
2

Because she is a victim he is a creep that had many girlfriends. He was not monogamous women would never make false accusations Sorry, anyone can do better? shoot the question over to a feminist reddit
/r/MensRights23/04/11 09:56 AM
2

can I hire you as commenter in http://human-stupidity.com ? you are really getting the point! And writing nicely! Are you a girl? That would be even more amazing, being critical of feminist abuses and getting right to the point!
/r/MensRights19/04/11 02:56 PM
1

Many guilty thieves, embezzlers, bullies, murderers, extortionists, obviously guilty mafia bosses and white collar criminals walk around free. Not enough proof beyond reasonable doubt. Such is the law.
/r/MensRights19/04/11 02:51 PM
8

PierceHarlan: Why is it possible that these egregious violations of constitutional rights happen all the time? Due process, equal rights, etc. How come feminists can trump the constitution of all countries, dominate the UN to give unconstitutional directives, violate human rights of men. Please explain. Furthermore, can't you contest the constitutionality at the Supreme Court of the USA? Get lots of work, but will gain you fame. If you lose, then let us all get castrated and get gender changes.
/r/MensRights19/04/11 02:18 PM
3

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/gtl12/jezebel_sucks_feminist_excuse_female_serial_child/ I had to write a post about this. And I discovered another feminist site that actually totally blamed the husband for it. Check it out. http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/mens-rights-feminism/jezebel-sucks-feminist-excuse-female-child-killer-lashanda-armstrong-instantly-delete-dissent
/r/MensRights19/04/11 01:42 PM
3

amazing. It took them almost 10 minutes to totally delete this. And there are people who think women don't have skills? It is 7 am and they catch a threatening post in 7 minutes. What efficiency!
/r/MensRights19/04/11 11:08 AM
8

I just posted a comment there. Let us see the reaction and how long it takes to be deleted. Human_Stupidity Tue 19 Apr 2011 6:54 AM I will probably get kicked out for this, because I am going against the spirit of radical feminism, but I try: If a man killed a couple of his kids, would you be looking for some explanations? Oh, he had an argument and thus killed his children? or would you blame male inborn violent nature? To tell the truth, if a man had just fondled his kids in funny ways, you wo…
/r/MensRights19/04/11 11:02 AM
3

Check the article. Getting “charged up” is not enough. If they had taken the young woman seriously instead of questioning her credibility, maybe other women would not have had to go through the same thing. Ninety to 95 percent of rapes are committed by serial rapists—such as O’Leary. With so much BS, you can not know if anything is true about all this story. Is there corroboration by any court report, or major newspaper? The newest Ms. cover story discusses the underreporting of rapes by police …
/r/MensRights16/04/11 04:16 PM
1

What are the charges he admitted? At least he is not admitting child abuse, so he does not get special attention to be raped because of his crime. But he is young, white, handsome. The ethnic minority gangs will enjoy his stay.
/r/MensRights16/04/11 03:02 PM
1

go ahead, feel free to post to human-stupidity.com . Or to rant about other posts.
/r/MensRights16/04/11 02:55 PM
3

Some might just simply be concerned with justice, the truth, honesty, and defending the victims of crime. No mater who the true victim is, be it the truly raped, or those raped by the legal system and false accusers.
/r/MensRights16/04/11 02:51 PM
5

a) she WANTED to burn his penis, she in fact she burned him to death. What a lying headline (not the poster's fault, but the newspaper's) Same woman http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/gp026/woman_burns_husband_to_death_and_walks_judge/ b) as always, how much proof of the abuse? And which man would get away with killing a bully when not in direct self defense? c) I am making a collection of similar cases, whoever can give me other examples of women that mutilated or killed and walked awa…
/r/MensRights13/04/11 01:12 PM
1

Please post to http://human-stupidity.com. On other topics too. Well founded comments stimulate discussion. I will probably vehemently disagree, but that will cause a lively discussion.
/r/MensRights13/04/11 10:01 AM
2

Thanks. You would be even more welcome to post comments on http://human-stupidity.com A few comments 12/ does anyone really see a problem with the age of consent being 16 but 18 for prostitution? I don't. Neither do I - in fact here you have to be 18 to be able to work most normal jobs, not just prostitution. Yes, but you don't get 5 years in jail if you hire a 16 year old to cut your lawn. Much less so if he told you he is 19. BUT to repeat, the main point is that it is a different type of rape…
/r/MensRights12/04/11 06:05 PM
2

6, you think it should be punished. We can agree to disagree. Or he should get some community service for disrespect. But, would you not rather be the victim of #6 (six-second-rape) then of real-violent-forcible-rape #1? Is this really the same? a forcible rape is a 5 second rape is a drunk rape is a Dworkin rape? NO WAY.
/r/MensRights12/04/11 04:45 PM
2

Actually, the main point of the article is that all these are DIFFERENT. Not all the same. I did not mean all should be unpunished or are correct. But maybe they should be treated differently. And we will probably disagree on the amount of punishment. But at least we can use terminology where we know what we are talking about. Why should everything be RAPE? Why screw up the language and make it fuzzy and unclear?? Probably so you can say that I want child rapists to go free and enrage everyone. …
/r/MensRights12/04/11 04:30 PM
3

Thanks for the detailed analysis. Can you post it to the blog, too? However, If you falsely tell someone that you are using a condom and you aren't you should be prosecuted. You have to consent to all acts of sex. I might consent to the risk of a condom breaking but not to unprotected sex. Do you agree to prosecute and jail women who lie about birth control? In reality such a lie costs a man $100 000's. I never heard a feminist who wants to prosecute for fraud. Only men get prosecuted
/r/MensRights12/04/11 03:58 PM
-10

well if the person is clearly passing out and is not your regular partner. It is almost necrophilia (being with a corpse) But still, the fact is that the person got herself into that state. If she then drives, or gets run over while walking, it is her fault too. If someone gets piss-drunk, they should not only have a responsible driver but also a responsible watcher and care-taker. The main problem is: the inversion of the burden of proof: If it can be proven beyond reasonable doubt that she was…
/r/MensRights12/04/11 02:56 AM
3

Try PierceHarlan from the false rape society. I have an inkling that this could interest him. Because a woman that complains months afterwards, without proof like a baby gets the man arrested instantly! I hope you did a DNA test, she probably raped another dozen of men!!
/r/MensRights10/04/11 10:27 AM
1

So was he. Drunk. So he was unable to consent too. That would make her a rapist. Right? Of course not. There always is a double standard. And, of course, she would never have to prove her blood alcohol level. And finally, why is she not responsible for having gotten herself up to a level where she is unable to legally function. And she still does not have to warn him of that fact?
/r/MensRights10/04/11 09:40 AM
2

It is good, we agree on most points. But: Light abuse like slapping, and throwing beer is considered acceptable when done by a woman against a man. And it went terribly wrong. But a) it is not exactly the woman's fault that the entire society (except r/mensrights) thinks it is ok to "lightly abuse" a man in public with slaps, hitting with umbrellas, throwing dishes, .... But what she did would have gotten a man in jail even if he had only thrown beer in her face without the terrible "accident" b…
/r/MensRights08/04/11 04:28 PM
2

exactly! I have been assailing this repeatedly! I like your example, do you have links to demonstrate the "pissing in public" sex offense convictions?
/r/MensRights08/04/11 08:16 AM
3

This is appalling. First of all a judge can not give a personal interview and opinion without getting crucified. Second: This is a good example how and why feminist language distortion works: I imagine a guy has been necking with a girl and then inserted his finger into her without asking for prior permission, but most likely without violence. As the judge said he was clumsy. It might have been normal behavior that thousands of men do, it might have been clumsy. But nothing that anyone imagines …
/r/MensRights08/04/11 07:46 AM
7

I would like to write a blog post about women who killed/mutilated and got away with it/got a slap on the wrist Lorena Bobbitt is an example. I appreciate if you could give me a ton of links of such cases. If someone wants to write the entire article as a guest post, that would be very welcome, too. Here we deal with a woman killing a boyfriend/husband. That is one main category. There are also women that get away with killing their children, rival women, alleged unproven rapists, ...
/r/MensRights02/04/11 09:25 AM
3

of course, this is selective. Only if the DNA says something that is bad for the woman, then it does not matter. If the DNA proves paternity in order to squeeze child support money out of an unsuspecting unlucky man, then DNA does matter!
/r/MensRights31/03/11 01:21 PM
14

Duped dads win back child payments Sole Parents Union president Kathleen Swinbourne said the new laws were hurting children at the centre of DNA disputes. "What does this say to children about being wanted, being loved, being parented? What does this do to children whose fathers turn around and say, `I'm not your daddy anymore, I don't want you'," she said. "The effect of this on children must be devastating. And that's to say nothing about the financial circumstances mothers find themselves in …
/r/MensRights30/03/11 11:35 PM
19

I posted a major article about this topic, I think I posted it to reddit too. Even if mother cheated, lied, or raped: father always pays child support. The most amazing case is a man that was not statutorily raped, but raped while passed out and unconscious from alcohol, by a person that was not his regular partner nor that he had taken home for sex. He had to pay too. Woman rapes unconscious man Man must pay child support. A friend of both the mother testified as to the same facts, plus the fac…
/r/MensRights30/03/11 11:29 PM
-2

and then there are the moderators of this r/mensrights who block anyone who thinks men should not go to jail for 15 years for possessing (on purpose or inadvertently) photos of nude 17 or 15 year olds. They think draconian punishment for men is not a mens rights issue. Let men rot in jail for possessing photos, it is not a men's rights issue. Women can have all their child abuse novels, no jail for that. http://www.reddit.com/r/WTF/comments/g9mtb/cute_child_photo_scares_reddits_mens_rights/c1ly1…
/r/MensRights23/03/11 11:02 PM
5

I would never have opened the door. Ask the lawyers if police is allowed to break into your house in the middle of the night, without a court order.
/r/MensRights10/03/11 10:17 AM
12

Can you imagine if your girlfriend actually was pissed at you and actively pursued false charges? You would never get out of jail, not for 15 years. Consider yourself lucky! Well, I am sorry for your mishap. But if someone can get that much harrassment while the "victim" is totally in your favor, defends you and presses no charges, can you imagine what would happen if ever she wanted to harm you? The main problem is that all men, at all times, have their fate in the hand of women who can get the…
/r/MensRights10/03/11 10:15 AM
1

I did not dare to say this because I had posts blocked here for the sin of advocating that sex with 15 year olds should go unpunished. Or, even worse, that possession of nude photos of 15 year olds should not yield a decade in jail. This is an official no-no on this reddit. I am actually glad you get away with this comment and even get upvoted. Has this policy changed? has member's attitude changed? I agree, of course, that men should not be punished more harshly then women. I also repeat my poi…
/r/MensRights09/03/11 06:19 AM
2

This is the worst part. If the woman gets pregnant, the poor boy has 20 years of child support, enforced by threat of debtor's prison. what i find appalling is that women in the comments of DM are saying its okay for them to have underage sex with boys because men cant get pregnant. Before his life has started, he is financially ruined. Now that, I think, is a serious traumatic experience: financial ruin lasting 20 years. I think a 15 year old boy should not be able to consent to 20 years of wag…
/r/MensRights09/03/11 06:12 AM
2

Great issues. Nothing against these topics. Just a few important topics are totally missing. I don't understand that most people here equate men's rights with father's rights. There are men in this world who are not fathers. The father's rights lobby don't just show disinterest in other issues, but outright hostility. I had a post deleted where a very reputable researcher showed that legalizing child porn reduces child abuse. So a post that can potentially save children gests deleted here. Dogma…
/r/MensRights08/03/11 11:30 PM
10

Isn't Jezebel a feminist site? and the females all were railing against the double standard favoring the woman, and thought the women should get a higher penalty. Before you vote me down, verify if I am not right!
/r/MensRights08/03/11 08:46 PM
1

You are totally right. Yes, I got raped by women many times. I just was not aware I was raped when I said no and then let her go ahead anyway. Nor did I call police for domestic violence when a unlucky shove by a girl made me fall badly breaking my rib. We men all are victims I keep writing about this language distortion: Manipulative Language distortion Groping a minor is rape, 17 year olds are children, so groping a 17 year old you are a child rapist. 17 year old "children"? United Nations con…
/r/MensRights08/03/11 08:41 PM
0

Now we have a very very important issue. Who will define what men's rights are? Will I be kicked out of the new change.org. mensrights because I post that a man should not get 15 years in jail for consensual sex with a xx year old who had a fake ID? Or that men should have the right to put up pinup photos in car repair shops? I am afraid to even write a number into xx here, because I might get censored out of here if xx were smaller then 16 Actually, not only get I censored, I also get threaths …
/r/MensRights02/03/11 08:39 AM
0

Only one problem, the widged does not work on change.org nor on human-stupidity.com It only says:"Waiting for page to load" Anyone gets a different result?
/r/MensRights02/03/11 08:25 AM
1

everyone who has a men's rights site should grab this widget and put it on his site. You can grab it on the change.org space where the petition is. antifeminist angry harry falserapesociety So for every feminist petition whe can do an ANTI petition to send to the same politicians. Such a fantastic idea. Why didn't I have this idea? **Grab a WidgetPP Have your own website or blog? Use the embed code below to allow your visitors to sign this petition. Embed Code <div id="change_BottomBar"><span id…
/r/MensRights02/03/11 08:05 AM
2

fantasic. Everyone should sign. Why nobody thought of this earlier. I was kicked out of change.org sucks for posting comments offensive to feminists. Not sure if I can sign after being kicked out. Change.org sucks: "womens rights" feminists censor & silence dissent We should cross-post this everywhere. Even in feminism. I think only positive signatures are allowed, so if 10 000 feminists are against it and 1000 for it, whe get extra votes.
/r/MensRights02/03/11 07:59 AM
2

well, it is your choice. Refuse to read the test. Or make it clear you will support the kid, no matter who the father is. Of course, the real father might sue for his fatherhood, then. It is also a matter of the rights of the real father. You can not sign these away. You can adopt only if the real father allows it. That is still your choice. But do you know what kinds of reasons the law gives why men in Germany or Britain are prohibited to test their children, under the threat of punishment?? Th…
/r/MensRights02/03/11 07:29 AM
19

I think it is perfectly ok to charge young men more for car insurance, as they have more accidents. If insurances have the math to prove it. BUT they also have to charge women more for health and pension insurance to pay for child leave, abortion cost, birth control cost, and especially the fact that they will receive old age pension for twice as long as men, for retiring earlier and living longer. Of course, women want to have equal fees where they really cost more, and lower fees where they ac…
/r/MensRights01/03/11 07:01 AM
4

Are you saying that there are not plenty of men oppressed in theocratic and otherwise non-democratic countries? This is exactly where the confusion is. You only look at women.
/r/MensRights27/02/11 09:45 PM
1

The Brazilian law uses this phrase. Very explicit. It remains to be seen if the law will be enforced. Brazil has a history of well meant unenforced laws with loop holes.
/r/MensRights26/02/11 11:22 AM
2

Avoiceforman is aggressive on purpose, to provoke, to call attention. Just as Angry Harry. Feminists are aggressive out of pure hate. Feminists are jailing thousands of men. Avoiceformen only says he is oblivious to their pain. He does not even say one should hurt women. Only that he does not care. Yes, he gives cannon fodder to feminists for attacking him as a misoynist. As if they needed such a pretense to attack. If a men's activist writes very carefully and politely, he will not get attaced,…
/r/MensRights25/02/11 09:43 AM
1

When are you supposed to do a pre-nup? Not right before marriage? Too close? should you do it 2 years after marriage? 1 year before? I don't get that one! Also: Some courts have thrown out prenups signed "too close" to the wedding, as they decided that it became duress. ("too close" has ranged from days to months!)
/r/MensRights25/02/11 04:17 AM
4

http://www.reddit.com/user/thetrollking everyone can verify this here and don't forget to hit "next" at the end of the page ........
/r/MensRights18/02/11 10:24 PM
6

Finally, girls competing in sports with no girl privileges. Equal rights at its best. In addition to the hazards mentioned by others: If he got a hard on, he probably would face serious consequences. But, what can he do against his biology? Anyone has a serious answer to this concern?
/r/MensRights18/02/11 01:57 PM
1

You should use the men's room. Using the women's room is dangerous because women are inherently violent. Before you downvote, please read the comments below about the experiences of masculine looking women. But serious, the posts below show the capacity for violence in women. Shove and threaten first, ask sex (gender) later. Exactly this attitude is what this r/mensrights is about. Same attitude that jails men on vague accusations of rape and domestic violence, etc.
/r/MensRights17/02/11 11:11 AM
3

Published: November 30, 2002 Did you look at the date? Actually, part of their plan has already been executed. More is to come.
/r/MensRights05/02/11 07:45 PM
0

actually, there is no jail for other debtors either. I wish some people who bounced checks, who owe me money would be jailed till they pay up. It is not going to happen. Civil problems don't cause jail terms. Also, if someone does not want to have a job, they normally don't get jailed for this. Only when it involves women and their children. Maybe this should be done with all the lazy welfare recipients? Get them to jail unless they find a job. In other words: the only debtor's prison is so that…
/r/MensRights04/02/11 11:13 PM
5

I wonder who downvotes an article like this? Only a arch-feminist who thinks all men deserve to be raped. Will the down-voters please step forward?
/r/MensRights04/02/11 02:01 PM
2

Thank you very much. I just wrote my comment in the form of a long blog post. Feminist rape laws don’t apply to male prison rape victims A prisoner is under the control and mercy of gangs of violent felons, all day long, unable to escape. Under the guardianship and responsibility of government. Feminist anti-rape activists certainly are concerned about the grave injustice of prison rape, which is on-going long term year-long power, humiliation, and sexual violence. Human-Stupidity is the only on…
/r/MensRights04/02/11 10:42 AM
2

Actually, it is maddening how people know they are distorting language to manipulate. To jail men, it is rape! And suddenly, when it befits them, they want to change it. to make men pay, it is NOT rape Why? Because California courts charged with interpreting California's statutory rape laws have recognized that "a minor . . . who voluntarily engages in sexual intercourse is not necessarily a victim of sexual abuse." In re Kyle F., 112 Cal. App. 4th 538, 543, 5 Cal. Rptr. 3d 190 (Cal. Ct. App. 20…
/r/MensRights04/02/11 09:03 AM
1

I wrote about exactly this topic and more Even if mother cheated, lied, or raped: father always pays child support. There was a REAL adult male rape victim who had to pay child support. He was totally passed out drunk, not her regular partner, and the girl bragged that she f.cked him and he did not even know. For equality purposes, there ought to be an option for a male to opt out of child support and opting for paying an abortion. At least, if he opts out he would not be responsible for any pay…
/r/MensRights04/02/11 08:52 AM
3

its the law. I have articles about this on human-stupidity.com
/r/MensRights01/02/11 03:27 PM
1

Thank you very much. Very relevant information. Lots if interesting conclusions for people who want to enforce gender equality and see glass ceilings everywhere. I already posted this on my blog. Wikipedia discriminates against women? Or gender differences are real?
/r/MensRights01/02/11 11:39 AM
11

This is the world wide teenage sex witch hunt. Sad. Shocking. Destroying lives, like of this little kid. Squandering court and jail resources. Human-Stupidity.com keeps writing about this and gets flak. Now in this case, a 19 year old with a 16 year old in love girlfriend, this really does not look like extreme perversion in need of 7 years in jail. Of course, if she were 15, then we both might get kicked out of mens rights, because from what I understand, advocating legal sex with a 16 year old…
/r/MensRights01/02/11 10:16 AM
1

this comment makes no sense. Most likely the offending comment has been deleted already, for violating the regulations of this reddit. Further discussion can be continued here. http://www.reddit.com/r/mensrightsmovement/comments/eufrn/mom_48_and_daughter_21_raped_same_teen_boy/
/r/MensRights01/01/11 05:06 AM
6

Of course, all is based on the disproved notion, that all sexes are equal. Any difference must be discrimination. Well, in reality women don't have the same (unhealthy) ambition as men. I cannot even mention other differences, or else I probably get banned from here. http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-scientific-fundamentalist/200908/why-modern-feminism-is-illogical-unnecessary-and-evil I am still waiting for the equal jail act, so that we get the same number of women in jail as men, and al…
/r/MensRights31/12/10 06:21 PM
3

Of course, if it were the father, unproven allegations would be enough for instant arrest. Lucky father that they did not put the blame on him! Anyway, I don't like these bloggers that tell these stories without linking to a trustworthy source. A major newpaper, news agency, police blotter .... The story is too extreme. pulling out teeth and toenails with pliers is major torture, will create lots of noise, and you have to be a total devil. If he had a few harmless nude photos of the 3 year old b…
/r/MensRights28/12/10 08:17 PM
1

Is this just my idea? that women usually snoop more, to find out about infidelity. Search pockets, bags, even garbage, and computer accounts. It is probably incorrect thing to do, but usually not a felony. And as the article said, what about parents snooping facebook accounts (ok, parents of minors have legal snooping rights). Are there not plenty of cases where women bring up proof of snooping in divorce proceedings? where they find secret bank accounts, expenses, etc?
/r/MensRights27/12/10 05:41 PM
2

That is the next step. Interesting that almost nobody mentions this. If the guy is 50, 50/2+7= 32. Put him in the slammer for having sex with a 31 year old. At least 7 years!! If the guy is 80, 80/2+7=47. Put the pedophile in jail for having sex with a 46 year old. What a creep!! This is exactly the point: put draconian laws to enforce some funny moral concepts with huge punishment. Most men's rights advocates are not aware that this will be the next step.
/r/MensRights27/12/10 04:55 AM
3

Actually, it is the feminist's concern that every man of the wrong age goes to jail for having sex with a young women. It is a feminist's concern that women are just immature things requiring protection at all ages. And other, serious, life threatening menaces like fetal alcohol syndome (permanent damage to a child caused by female irresponsible behavior) or the general child obesity scourge are simply ignored. I actually wrote about this here: ["Child Food-Porn" (Junk food advertising) makes ou…
/r/MensRights27/12/10 04:51 AM
1

If it is your sperm then you pay. Even if she raped you whild you were piss drunk and passed out (this really happened) Even if mother cheated, lied, or raped: father always pays child support http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/mens-rights-feminism/men-pay-child-support-even-if-fraud-deceit-lie-rape
/r/MensRights24/12/10 03:02 PM
15

Will there be more comments about this not being men's rights issue? Complaints about me defending the rights of "pedophiles" not to get castrated for having an affair, maybe without sex, with legal 17 year olds?
/r/MensRights21/12/10 10:03 AM
2

I was expecting the typical comments about "what does that have to do with men's rights". Too bad that there is no detailed info about what is REALLY in the book. Maybe it is not as bad as the press describes. What age group pedophilia did he advocate (17 years old?). How could he teach to escape prosecution, if it were younger pre-adolescents? Maybe the book can be downloaded somewhere? Maybe it is dangerous to do so? But, as long as terrorist manuals can be openly sold in the US, there is simp…
/r/MensRights21/12/10 09:41 AM
1

Right, see the comment in the human-stupidity.com post. 2) PS:I differ from Pizzey here: It is quite plausible that this emotional terrorist behavior has a genetic component. There certainly are women, who, in spite of adverse childhood, do not become “violence prone”. And some violence prone women might have helped to actually create their own traumatic childhood, by their own unruly temperament.
/r/MensRights18/12/10 10:56 AM
2

A lot has been written about Erin Pizzey. She described a class of female troublemakers (yes there are some male troublemakers, but the newspapers and the internet are full of that already.) Maybe men should understand the psychology of the "emotional terrorist". After reading Pizzey's description, who has not yet met one of these, or even one in the close family? The beginning chapters of Pizzey's book can be read for free on Amazon's Kindle, or the PC or iphone Kindle version.
/r/MensRights17/12/10 02:59 PM
1

I thought presumption of innocence and due process have ended long ago!? what is new about this? http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality/rape-laws-no-due-process Of course, it is shocking. But, presumption of innocence has long been abolished in rape or child abuse accusations. But yes, it does go further. It does not only abolish presumption of innocence, it formally introduces clear and total presumption of guilt. It does go another step. So whenever a bank robbery happens. I…
/r/MensRights15/12/10 05:24 AM
1

You can wash out the condom and flush the sperm down the sink or the toilet. Then the condom can be safely disposed of in the garbage You can use soap for washing, if you are paranoid
/r/MensRights12/12/10 02:00 PM
5

It is not rape. It should be felony fraud. Embezzling maior resouces for 20 years in a row. I am writing very provocatively, on purpose. Criminalize pregnancy-by-lying-about-birth-control A woman that gets pregnant after assuring she is taking birth control is committing fraud. In this case, she should either abort, or assume the sole financial responsibility for the child. Additional criminal sanctions might be applied, too. Ideally, an agreement about birth control should be made in writing. S…
/r/MensRights12/12/10 01:56 PM
3

In ancient times, infanticide was an abortion substitute. If the baby was not viable, it could be killed, or just left to itself to die. Not viable means serious health problems, or impossibility to care for it for example if mother has already too many children to care for and one more would be a problem for the already existing family Philosopher Peter Singer can find reasons to extend "abortion" into the first weeks after live birth. We can agree that in the case of a healthy baby and with ou…
/r/MensRights12/09/10 08:04 PM
-4

What feminist laws obsess about nude photos? http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality/child-pornography-charges-for-taking-own-photos http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality/child-porn-baby-bath-pictures Family pictures of nude baby bath: ruinous child porn prosecution http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/child-porn-witch-hunt/lynching-adolescent-video-is-legal-but-nude-adolescent-photos-felony-crime http://human-stupidity.com/stupid-dogma/teenage-sexuality/…
/r/MensRights10/09/10 01:23 PM
-5

there is a connection between African hunger and African Military. Because the military money could go to fight hunger. So the same about these topics. There is a HUGE problem about our children's health being destroyed. And instead people think they have to put huge heroic effort into protecting children against an imaginary danger of someone collecting 30 year old indecent photos, or looking at videos with 16 year olds legally taken in Holland 30 years ago. And this heroic effort for imaginary…
/r/MensRights10/09/10 01:07 PM
11

the food porn alone sure deserves attention on itself. But not in the men's right section. But we have a national and world wide health calamity. Our children get poisoned by their own parent's stupid food habits. It needs all our effort and energy to solve this problem. And instead we put all our police and legal effort into hunting down someone who possesses a few nude photos of adolescents. This huge effort should be put into a real problem that disables and kills children and destroys their …
/r/MensRights10/09/10 12:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter