TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HumanMob Archive

View 4 posts and 239 comments by HumanMob on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Yeah, because all people are the same...
/r/MensRights03/06/13 02:20 AM
16

That's fucking child abuse, a prison is no place for a child.
/r/MensRights28/05/13 06:16 AM
2

Of course! It doesn't matter who you are, if you are for mens rights then you're always welcome!
/r/MensRights27/04/13 08:50 PM
4

Teachers said that the sexism of old had not gone away but had been ‘rebranded’ as something fashionable, ironic or empowering, where young girls were learning to accept as normal the exploitation and objectification of women’s bodies. OK, either let women wear what they want or dont. Make up your fucking minds. Personally, i think girls and women should be free to dress how the fuck they want and not have it judged as "exploiting" or "objectifying" when THEY are the ones doing it to THEMSELVES.…
/r/MensRights16/04/13 02:02 AM
-4

why do you have an apostrophe after men? Men is rights are human rights? nah, Mens rights are human rights. grammar bro.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 03:44 AM
2

but the fact that short people/small breasted people exist is proof that that's not the case, people are attracted to various forms, shapes, and looks, that's why the human species is so diverse. Culture has more impact on what we find attractive than anything else, just look at those freaky african tribes that dig chicks with long necks and the ones with those lip rings. Personally, i don't give a damn about what a girl looks like as long as her genes aren't utter shit, i love people based on w…
/r/MensRights15/03/13 01:44 AM
-2

What the fuck is its purpose? Shifting blame isn't doing anyone any good its just perpetuating hate.
/r/MensRights15/03/13 01:30 AM
7

might want to re-word that, sounds like you're saying women choose to get "raped"
/r/MensRights13/03/13 02:53 AM
1

he is a man; he should be able to speak for himself what does being a man have to do with speaking up for himself? you're only perpetuating gender stereotypes by saying this.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 12:15 AM
35

damn, and here i was thinking we had control over our own bodies, oh no wait that's just women.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 09:24 PM
1

And this is based on the truth of women's bathroom lines? Yes, clearly not enough people speak up otherwise there wouldn't be lines. Here's a fact - the few considerate women who get in and get out are powerless to say anything to anyone when they're way in the back of the line down the hall outside of the bathroom. It's unfortunate, but this kind of mentality is common. Everyone else took their sweet ass time, so why shouldn't I? Right? Well, this is what's happening Damn, it sounds like you kn…
/r/MensRights12/03/13 06:31 AM
0

The solution to that problem would be to allow transpeople to use the bathrooms for their gender (female bathrooms for transwomen and male for transmen). It's not that easy, before transitioning that wouldn't be possible and even after some trans folk are often misgendered. I am not comfortable with strange women being around when going about my business. That's exactly my point, what if that's a trans man who simply hasn't started to process to look more masculine?
/r/MensRights12/03/13 06:27 AM
0

Women complaining about how they don't want to see that so they would have to put individual ones behind doors instead of the long trough. That's ridiculous! That's not something a grown adult would do! kids might, but shit i've never heard of a mature individual being so ridiculous. Even so, if men voiced their opinion as well then i'm pretty sure the urinals would stay.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 06:24 AM
1

urinals would still exist. problem solved.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 06:19 AM
-2

damn, you really overreacted. The only similarity i pointed out was that they were both legitimization based on the "feeling" of comfort.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 06:18 AM
1

Making the bathrooms bigger would just cause women to spend more time in them. Ahh, i love facts based on truth. But there's no reason to use up expensive real estate just to accommodate people who are inconsiderate to other members of their own sex. I'm pretty sure if you verbally expressed yourself to an inconsiderate individual then they'd likely not do it as often if a collective commutation effort was placed to me more kind. And seriously, money is more important than fixing a problem?
/r/MensRights12/03/13 06:16 AM
-2

The difference was that segregation actually had lower standards for black people AND that the black people actually seriously minded the segregation. I never said anything against that. I said segregation, both gender and racial, were based off the same reason which you stated. Both were segregation simply because people didn't "feel comfortable." Again, we're talking about feelings here, nothing else. One last thing, if things are so "equal" then why are people complaining about it?
/r/MensRights12/03/13 06:11 AM
8

Can you think of any other "socialized behavior" that would make women's bathroom lines longer? I could see needing to use the mirror as an example but you really don't need to wait in a line to look in the mirror.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 12:37 AM
-1

Coming from a transgendered person, unisex bathrooms are something i dream of everyday. Not being reminded multiple times each day that you're born different? yeah, that sounds pretty awesome. Also, the whole "womens line are too long" thing is probably the dumbest reason to keep things segregated, just make the bathrooms bigger! I'm pretty sure there would still be urinals in a unisex bathroom too, so guys still have the advantage.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 12:32 AM
-4

It makes many people, including myself, feel more comfortable Think about that for a second, can you remember a time in history when certain people were segregation based on the FEELING of comfortablity?
/r/MensRights12/03/13 12:27 AM
10

By socialized behavior i think they mean the stereotype that girls go to the bathroom in large groups, which i would love to hear how that would be anyone's fault but theirs.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 12:23 AM
1

I'm done. Good thing you had a point to all this.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 11:26 PM
1

Do you have a fucking point to any of these questions?
/r/MensRights11/03/13 11:15 PM
1

I dress how i want to dress, it's not a factor when i have my knife with me.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 11:08 PM
2

No young woman would consent to having sex with five guys in a bathroom unless she was seriously troubled. First, yes there have been. Second, now you're telling women what the can and cannot do. This thinking only hurts.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 10:06 PM
1

I do, i carry a knife around with me whenever i know i'll be walking in an un-lit or sketchy area.
/r/MensRights10/03/13 05:05 PM
2

what the fuck are you even talking about, if they're in a rape-prone area then precautions to defend themselves should be taken.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 02:05 AM
3

the raping rapists.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 12:10 AM
3

Rapists, i thought that was self-explanatory.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 10:05 PM
9

The law is more complicated that that. If the person almost died or if there was proof she was trying to kill him then yes it would be.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 10:04 PM
5

Hey, segregation saved all those poor white people from those nasty black people in the past, why not extend this ideology? /s
/r/MensRights07/03/13 10:02 PM
1

you're right, it's damaging, but a hell of a lot less damaging then being physically abused. Pros vs cons bro.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 06:55 PM
5

It's like this, when it comes to physical things that people can't seem to let go of (drugs, alcohol, porn, ect) it's better to have the government in control of the business than criminals (which will happen, we've seen it before). Taking away freedoms only gives criminals another thing to exploit and make money off of. Do people really think this will be a good idea knowing things of this caliber have miserably failed in the recent-ish past?
/r/MensRights07/03/13 09:14 AM
7

I know Japan has child porn (just photos, selling/producing is still illegal) and their child molestation rates are insanely low because those sick fucks can just wank it out of their systems each time they get an urge instead of going directly to the source and seriously ruining a child's life.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 09:07 AM
60

Men are not rapists. Rapists are rapists. When a woman gets raped it's never her fault, NEVER. To say that there aren't ways to prevent rape (such as carrying a knife or gun) isn't blaming anyone, it's just being safe.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 04:38 AM
0

Some teenagers yes, but many don't know how to deal with that kind of emotional connection so early.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 05:56 PM
24

This article is clearly sarcastic, no one is dumb enough to this this way.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 07:14 PM
8

if a 15 year old boy wants to fuck a woman above the age of 18 than thats not rape You have no idea why statutory rape laws were founded in the first place. Sure they may "want" it now, but there's a proven amount of psychological effects that damage the child later on. Look this shit up and stop being ignorant.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 06:58 PM
3

Around the country there are plenty of cases of underage boys who got a woman pregnant and then tried to avoid paying child support. The 15-year-old in California who was seduced by the 34-year-old mom next door. The 13-year-old boy in Kansas who had sex with his 17-year-old baby­sitter. The 15-year-old boy in Florida who impregnated a 20-year-old. Under a strict interpretation of the law, these boys, by virtue of their age, were raped. But family courts have seen these incidents for what they w…
/r/MensRights03/03/13 06:49 PM
1

Doesn't have to be that way, it starts with a change which i understand might be unrealistic at this time but you need to start stepping towards progress sometimes. Also, how do you know the person deserved the violence to that extreme? Are you the judge, jury, what's your authority for that kind of damaging decision?
/r/MensRights03/03/13 07:13 AM
0

Ok, i'm not saying we shouldn't fight hitler, cause it's fucking hitler and he killed millions, but average day to day people who aren't committing genocide shouldn't be met with violence. It's a difficult thing to understand and to grasp because we're so used to violence. Ghandi has proven to us that there are ways to get around an obstacle we just have to use our brain instead of our bodies. EDIT: grammar.
/r/MensRights03/03/13 01:31 AM
1

I wouldn't say it's the "biggest" source, but it is very significant because it involves children which makes mothers (also fathers but less common) very defensive and usually sexist as long as it makes them feel like their children are safe.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 10:01 PM
7

Violence is never acceptable, no matter who's the victim/perpetrator.
/r/MensRights02/03/13 09:55 PM
0

So what makes a man then? What will satisfy your definition? Should they be as swift as a coursing river? Maybe mysterious, like the dark side of the moon? asshole.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 06:59 PM
2

Correct me if i'm wrong, but i think the issue is that if a women rapes a man and gets pregnant as a result, the man should also be included in the category of not allowing rapists to get custody/visitation of their children. Taking away a child from a rapist mother is no different than taking a child away from a rapist father.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 12:43 AM
1

All those words have more specific definitions then that. That they do. However this doesn't stop feminists for using those words in whatever definition that helps them "win" an argument.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 07:31 AM
7

heterosexual couples are able to adopt or sue for custody, that only heterosexual couples engage in domestic violence and abuse, that only heterosexual men are victims of rape? That's not what the article is about. It's about trans people being able to use restrooms and play on sports teams of the gender they identify with. I can see how this can be connected to mens rights since it involves gender issues...however i don't think they connection is big enough to be put in this sub. However I'm re…
/r/MensRights22/02/13 12:02 AM
3

This is great news and i love to hear it...but what does this have to do with men's rights?
/r/MensRights21/02/13 10:07 PM
2

Then is there a slur for defending men sexist, misogynist, rape apologist, or whatever overused slang feminists come up with.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 06:13 PM
1

I agree, it annoys me ever so deeply. We're not fighting for the culture of men, we're fighting for men's rights in order to achieve equality. I really don't know why feminism wasn't named the "woman's rights" movement when all other civil liberty movements were strictly about rights.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 06:09 PM
3

WOMEN HAVE LITTLE INTEREST IN VIDEO GAMES! there's not any women on that panel because no woman WANTS to be on that panel. Please feminists, list all the females who either applied or are qualified to be in that position. I'm waiting. Just let women do what they want and stop forcing equality down everyone's throats.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 05:44 PM
1

I agree it affects males more so than females, however that does not necessarily mean it's a gender issue. I feel you're looking at in in the wrong way, instead of shouting about gender, argue how it shits all over freedom of speech/artistic expression. You'll go a lot farther in a thinking that affects everyone and appeals to common thought.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 07:22 PM
3

There's no way you can know that and it certainly isn't evidence. I highly doubt a teacher would think a girl drawing weapons is harmless "because she's a girl", in my opinion it would be a lot worse of a reaction because girls typically do not draw weapons.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 05:49 AM
1

There's no evidence to suggest that if a girl drew the same thing she wouldn't receive an equal response. If there was then i'd agree with you.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 05:36 AM
7

I don't really think this is a gender thing, but it's still fucked up.
/r/MensRights19/02/13 10:36 PM
2

Some people are just crazy.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 04:31 PM
1

However it makes sense that work done in class and homework would penalize your grade rather than getting you into detention Grades should be a representation of your knowledge, not your behavior.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 06:32 PM
1

I understand the need to discipline a child, but giving them poorer grades is not the way to do it.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 03:35 AM
1

Well i dated a feminist who insisted we split the bill on the first date. Not paying for it entirely but i guess that's what equality is right?
/r/MensRights11/02/13 08:02 PM
6

Being an annoying brat has nothing to do with their capability to solve a math problem, why the fuck are classroom behaviors a factor in grades?
/r/MensRights11/02/13 05:40 PM
25

"guys can't be raped, they willingly submit." and "when a woman is raped it's not big deal but when a man is raped then the media makes it a huge deal Those two statements contradict one another, if a guy cant be raped why would the media make a big deal out of something "impossible"?
/r/MensRights08/02/13 08:55 PM
2

EXACTLY!!! That would put us on the same level as feminists.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 07:51 PM
1

In my experience it's the exact opposite.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 07:43 PM
6

I don't know about you but my close friends and I have no trouble sharing emotions or other troubles.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 05:01 AM
3

Not saying it didn't happen, just saying they aren't for mens rights if they think that way; it's counterproductive.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 05:00 AM
15

I don't even understand how it's a stereotype for guys to not have really close friends. In my experience women tend to have more friends, while men tend to have less, albeit MUCH closer relationships with those few friends. It really should be the other way around but hey, the media does as it pleases.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 02:46 AM
1

If you have another kid will things balance out? (not suggesting it, just curious if the law is equal)
/r/MensRights08/02/13 02:42 AM
5

the MRM can be the same way which manifests when you see comments about men in abusive relationships having failed to use “game” with their female partner. Whoever said/says that shit is definitely not for mens rights.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 02:38 AM
4

It's a mens issue because it directly affects men, however feminists claim it's a feminist issue because, indirectly, it implies that level of femininity is looked down upon (or whatever indirect reason they come up with). The fact of the matter is that it harms men more than women and although i'm glad they're trying to put a stop to that i can't help but notice their highly flawed logic.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 01:38 AM
1

Not really making an argument, just saying in my experience with people I've met in the real world have much simpler reasons for claiming to be a feminist than what OP suggested. Not saying that's what they DO, but rather their reasons for joining.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 12:39 AM
1

Women lean towards feminism because it's a group they feel accepted in and feel they are making a difference.The real life feminists i've talked to claim to be a feminist because they support womens rights and better treatment of women, doesn't really go farther than that in my experience.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 06:25 PM
0

Its only mainstream appeal is a result of the fact that it offers women politicized benefits by forcible wealth transfer from men. That's completely false, i can see how that could be an indirect result of feminism but i hardly consider that an appeal or common knowledge for that matter. Feminism relies on affirmative action, alimony, and the ability for a woman to accuse whoever she wants of rape at no penalty in order to derive support from the majority of women. Again, i can see that as anoth…
/r/MensRights07/02/13 05:43 PM
2

the people who enter the teaching profession are megalomaniacal nitwits who absolutely love the arbitrary authority bestowed upon them by the State. That's a bit over-the-top. Most people i've talked to who are trying to enter the teaching profession usually cite helping children as a main reason. I have however seen people who go start teaching (usually always elementary education)simply because they don't have anything else to do. These people scare me and make me fear for our youngest kids. I…
/r/MensRights02/02/13 09:34 PM
1

That's what i was wondering. Good to know in the eyes of the law some things are still equal.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 01:51 AM
1

I mean why is it exclusive to girls.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 11:57 PM
3

Under Tennessee law, a victim of statutory rape can be considered an accomplice in the crime against her Her? Is there something i missed?
/r/MensRights31/01/13 02:58 AM
9

$20 says she makes it out to be another example of "the patriarchy" and completely flips it.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 08:13 PM
12

This is what i've always had a gripe with. The media is sexist as fuck, after all they're only after money and sex sells. However, what feminists can't seem to understand is that it's sexist against BOTH genders, equally.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 08:10 PM
2

How do you think this change in society will affect men/women's interactions with one another?
/r/MensRights29/01/13 12:10 AM
15

Not a very good counter-argument.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 12:05 AM
7

It's not so much that being promiscuous is a bad thing per se, just that being promiscuous doesn't get you a relationship with "Mr. Right". If promiscuous people wanted a solid, loving, and connecting relationship they wouldn't base it solely on sex. Unfortunately being promiscuous trains people to only look for sex in a relationship, which is not how love happens. This affects both genders equally and is a problem that both genders need to solve together.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 12:04 AM
-1

Very well spoken.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 04:51 PM
3

I'm all for abolishing violence against women, but when they call it "gender violence" it irritates the hell out of me.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 04:24 PM
2

I agree, seems my blind anger got the better of me.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 03:55 PM
10

Shit, you are correct. My bad.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 05:15 AM
20

The bottom one especially fucks with my anger. Only women could be so vain as to think that men not being allowed to do something hurts women more than men.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 01:52 AM
5

I'm assuming there's no responsibility on the woman's part?
/r/MensRights27/01/13 08:57 PM
6

Tearing that wasn't isn't the right thing to do. Free speech still applies.
/r/MensRights26/01/13 02:11 AM
1

Angry people are dumb people, they shit like assault someone with a deadly weapon on table. Not exactly a gender thing except for the concept that society is somehow ok with a woman assaulting whomever they please. I guess my gripe is the dude behind the counter should have called the police or something, because that behavior isn't acceptable.
/r/MensRights25/01/13 10:59 PM
4

No, people are awesome. Humans are awesome. Those aren't men doing amazing things, it's individuals doing amazing things. God damn this sub is getting farther and farther away from actual activism.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 11:05 PM
2

the prospect of women being drafted might make the country reluctant to go to war. They make it sound like it's a bad thing.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 05:59 PM
0

All women No, no no no no no. Stop generalizing, you hate it when feminists make broad statements like "all men", so fucking stop being a hypocrite.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 01:01 AM
15

It should be "unconsensual sex". What's wrong with that? why do we need to be that specific?
/r/MensRights24/01/13 12:57 AM
-2

I don't think fighting segregation with segregation is going to do any good. We should be fighting to stop discrimination, not add more to balance it out.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 07:09 PM
2

Even if he was 100% guilty, It shouldn't matter what he did. Taking the law into your own hands and conspiring to commit pre-meditated murder can't be justified. EDIT: Why didn't she go to the police? If she's willing to go to an assassin i'm pretty sure the police are in her range of options.
/r/MensRights22/01/13 07:07 PM
-1

If convicted Donna Lange faces 21 to 27 months in prison. TIL murder will get you less than 3 years...but only if you're a woman.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 07:46 PM
5

Did you try talking to her? If you calmly and gently talked to her about this and how it made you feel and why it bothered you then maybe it would help/fix your problems. Communication dude, more important than you'd think.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 07:41 PM
7

Correct me if i'm wrong, but i think this is geared towards gays more than women. judging by the pants that last photo has a male photographer i believe. EDIT: i really don't think this is that big of a deal, but if the roles were reversed there'd be complete outrage.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 07:19 PM
8

Anyone not yet banned at /r/feminists that can post this? Aren't we all?
/r/MensRights18/01/13 06:39 PM
2

You can't justify murder. Also, what ever happened to due process? There needs to be a trial and solid proof. I mean, this isn't america so i can't really speak for the canadian justice system.
/r/MensRights18/01/13 06:24 PM
1

Oh, that makes sense.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 10:00 PM
12

But is he entirely blameless? He should be blamed in the same way a rape victim should be blamed. Not at all.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 09:23 PM
1

I understand the human desire to protect our young, but that doesn't justify sexism. If the airline wanted to protect children then they would make is so that no one, male or female, could sit next to an unaccompanied minor.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 09:11 PM
0

I know why this subreddit might be considered hate, but I don't know why the MRA movement in whole is labeled as such...maybe because most members have a lot of hate in them because of the injustices they faced. They're angry and that makes people think we're a hate group even though we don't campaign hate.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 08:34 PM
1

Feminist Rights Activists (FRAs) They'd be Female Rights Activists, no one is campaigning for the rights of the feminist organization. (i don't think?)
/r/MensRights17/01/13 08:32 PM
1

In this case, the adult didn't seem to fit those descriptions. And you're right, blanket statements aren't fair and i don't agree that line of thinking should be used in every case.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 01:50 AM
-1

Because one person earned that seat through hard work and the other had the seat given to them. Which one deserves the seat? EDIT: alright, i'm kinda sounding like an asshole and i think that might make point moot. But still, the situation is bullshit.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 09:16 PM
6

I know they're paid for i meant not by the child.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 08:50 PM
18

Why doesn't the child just move? He paid for the ticket, the child did not. And if parents have such a fear of their child being molested then don't put them on a plane alone, that's irresponsible parenting. And is the risk of being molested in a small flying metal tube stuffed with other people kinda small? How about the flight staff do their goddamn job and make sure no one gets hurt instead of being sexist douches.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 06:44 PM
2

Oh i know, i was just venting.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 03:43 PM
5

We tell people how to avoid danger in almost every situation, much like how we tell people to lock their doors and keep their belongings close to them. If they didn't do these things and still get robbed it's still the thieves fault. Nobody blames them for getting their shit stolen, but just know there are ways to prevent these things from happening in the future. Just telling a criminal to stop being a criminal isn't going to prevent crime.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 03:33 PM
7

Fucking tragedy.
/r/MensRights16/01/13 03:03 PM
9

Not sure how credible that survey is...but i'd love to hear what feminists think of this
/r/MensRights16/01/13 02:52 PM
1

Even if the applicant is gay, like Matthews, women would still object, because he's a man Sexism.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 07:51 PM
5

A woman stole an empty commuter train from a depot Tuesday and drove it to a suburb of Stockholm where it derailed and slammed into an apartment building, officials said. They mentioned the gender in the first sentence, even the first word is "A woman". Sure, it's not a title but it's something.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 07:36 PM
2

Living without ANY parent will cause harm to the child. And she didn't even debunk shit! Her surveys and statistics aren't even credible.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 07:31 PM
1

The only time violence is acceptable is when it's the only option left in order to directly save someones life, including your own.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 06:32 PM
4

They shouldn't be teaching acceptance of feminism, that's propaganda and brainwashing. What should be taught is equality between genders, not the organization itself.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 08:11 AM
2

I'm sure there are men who hate being fathers too. I guess it goes both ways, is that what you were trying to say?
/r/MensRights15/01/13 08:04 AM
2

Wait until you have kids.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 05:26 AM
1

I don't know who the man/woman is, but the person trying to see their son just got out of jail...not sure if they're the person i'd want to be around my son. However if that person was paying child support then they better be able to visit.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 05:26 AM
0

A 2012 study [PDF] found that 67% of Baby Boomer women were giving their parents some form of financial support, compared with 62% of Baby Boomer men. I would hardly consider a 5% difference being proof that "Women support their parents more", especially since they outnumber men by 2% anyway.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 05:19 AM
1

Don't let something as trivial as an ideology come between the person you love. Fucking talk that shit out bro, if she's being a cunt about it then just ignore it and move on. If you think it's bad now just wait until the divorce, with her supremacy thoughts you know she's gonna go after your shit.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 05:12 AM
0

I tried to explain why in my post but i understand if it wasn't interpreted right. Violence in general is never the solution, it will end the conflict of course, but not solve it. End =/= Solve.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 04:32 AM
0

She says no, and them jumps on top... and I am making absolutely zero motions... I'm a rapist? When i say no means no, i'm including both genders. Kinda thought that was a given. EDIT: shit, didn't read well enough. I don't think that ever happens, if it did then yes you are right.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 04:27 AM
2

Power?
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:40 AM
3

Personally, i believe in non-violence and what the guy did was right. He restrained her without causing harm and allowed her to be escorted off the premise without the incident escalating to the point where police are called. Sure, he could have knocked her out with one hit but that wouldn't solve anything, it would just end the conflict which is NOT a solution. However i do think it's sad that even when restraining her without trying to cause harm, people still thought he was abusing/hurting th…
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:34 AM
5

Why are people so disturbed by the male body?
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:17 AM
-1

So what are we supposed to do then? Whenever they say no just keep going? This causes more problems then actually stopping when she says so will. I understand what you're saying and i agree that it's a problem that desperately needs fixing...but c'mon man you have to realize sometimes the woman ACTUALLY means no, i don't care how rare it is you can't ignore that.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 01:13 AM
0

Ok, i understand your point but we as men need to take responsibility for our own actions and when she says no, then stop. If she doesn't like it then tough shit she shouldn't have said no. Eventually, it will get women to re-think their body language and figure out what they really want and to stop misleading us. In the meantime, no means no.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 12:57 AM
0

That's perfection, bravo.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 11:59 PM
1

"Tell those things to a rapist and see what happens" Telling people not to rape is like telling someone not to steal, hurt, or murder another human being. Everyone knows these things are wrong but the sick ones do it anyway.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 11:57 PM
12

Lifetime = channel for women Spike = channel for men of course there are going to be some sexist things said and done on both. The best approach is to change the channel and watch something else...Unless you're trying to rid all channels of sexism, in that case keep going.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 11:54 PM
14

It's as if the word 'gender' applies exclusively to women.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 11:46 PM
0

We can think of a better title than copying women's format. Kinda like Men's rights isn't called Masculism as compared to Feminism. Also, let's not stoop to feminist tactics and buy politicians, that's no good. I was hoping we'd keep the movement more pure than that.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 11:38 PM
2

financial obligations. Oh...now i see. More to add to the breadwinner stereotype. I wish they'd just think of the children and have it 50/50.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 11:15 PM
3

If a girl (or any person really) say's no, but their body language says yes (meaning they are initiating/partaking in sex) then it shouldn't be rape. Whoa, that is not what he was saying. He was saying that it's very confusing and that women need to be aware of that to avoid those situations...but ultimately if she says no then the answer is no. No means no, bro.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 11:11 PM
3

That's not a valid excuse though, she still didn't have to sign it.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 10:08 PM
3

Seriously though, who needs $175,000 per month?
/r/MensRights14/01/13 10:06 PM
-2

Privileged! hahaha, someone needs to post this in /r/feminism!
/r/MensRights13/01/13 08:20 PM
1

Exactly, hit the nail on the head. But...title IX ignores this same line of logic.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 12:32 AM
1

Why not? What's your disagreement with that?
/r/MensRights13/01/13 12:25 AM
6

I think they're just saying it to describe themselves. If all they said was that they were female then i would agree with you.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 09:58 PM
1

that seems like it would just spread misinformation...just label male problems and start a men's rights club or something.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 09:30 PM
3

But the definition only includes penetration...what about unconsensual sex? So if a woman forces sex on a man it's still not rape...
/r/MensRights12/01/13 12:40 PM
-1

Just look at that smirk..
/r/MensRights11/01/13 08:51 PM
2

There shouldn't be anything sexual about breasts, which unfortunately there is. If kids can suck on them and revive life-giving milk then they should be able to touch them as well.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 08:33 PM
8

Oh mum knows because she has had all sorts of things in her own mouth dear Please point out where it implies ANY of the things you just listed. You did that yourself, you took offense to something that was ONLY a joke and only implied that the mother, at some point in her life, sucked a dick. If she's married, then that's probably true and contrary to what you might believe, sucking a dick isn't "slutty, stupid, faggy or whatever pejorative you're dog whistling."
/r/MensRights11/01/13 08:25 PM
-1

I was just trying to send the message that this is a place for the promotion of Men's Rights, not a place where we berate one other for the most insignificant things. (Which is what you and i are doing right now)
/r/MensRights11/01/13 08:30 AM
2

Wow, what a great cast of irresponsible teenagers. Both the mother and the father, incredible irresponsible.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 07:13 AM
2

This isn't accurate either. Actually, i think it's worse than the original. Seriously mods can you please handle this?
/r/MensRights11/01/13 06:59 AM
5

SHE WAS DRUNK DRIVING WITH 3 KIDS IN THE CAR! WHAT THE FUCK!
/r/MensRights11/01/13 03:20 AM
2

I completely agree, but it seems that if people are complaining about it then they clearly haven't done that.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 02:30 AM
5

Seriously guys? There's a reason you have the option of deleting your history, and if you want to save porn then just save it on a flash drive and hide it or something. Instead of complaining how about take action and solve the problem yourself.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 02:17 AM
4

No need for name calling, and i would hardly consider using a handheld electronic device "barbaric", for whatever reason.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 02:13 AM
6

Yea, that put me off too but i just dismissed it as harmless ignorance and kept reading.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 01:56 AM
3

i REALLY hate this phrase, but what she did there was contribute to the "rape culture" that feminists constantly whine about.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 10:25 PM
2

It's hard to be active over the internet. If it's something that can be, for example signing an online petition i don't see why we wouldn't and if we didn't then bringing it up would be a good idea.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 04:00 PM
4

Did you tell you you were in fact raped/how did she react?
/r/MensRights10/01/13 03:52 PM
22

I agree, there's no way that behavior wasn't learned.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 05:30 AM
1

ahhh, I see.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 11:58 PM
2

WHY IS THIS NEWS?!? why are people giving a shit about what genders or races are in the white house, when what they should be worrying about is who's qualified for the job! We're on the verge of a fiscal cliff and people are stressing out over why there aren't more females? There are much, MUCH bigger issues to be looking at when it comes to the government than sex or race.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 11:49 PM
1

Why is your book reinforcing gender stereotypes? Soccer is hugely popular among girls, and dancing is loved by many boys.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 11:38 PM
7

Telling someone how to be safe isn't victim blaming in any way, because THEY'RE NOT VICTIMS. It's only victim blaming if you tell them they should could have prevented it AFTER the rape occurs. At which point it's still the rapists fault no matter what. Why don't feminists understand this?
/r/MensRights09/01/13 07:58 PM
1

Is it legal to be that biased in a news article? Seriously, the use of adjectives went above and beyond. It's almost like the the people who wrote the article aren't letting you have an opinion, like only their view on the case is the view that should be looked at. Not saying their view isn't wrong, that law is kinda fucked up but they could have at least been respectable about it.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 07:45 PM
0

The funny thing is that both are bullshit.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 07:37 PM
2

I posted this a little while ago, this isn't a pdf so it probably isn't what your looking for but it includes the topics you mentioned. http://www.pbs.org/thinktank/transcript132.html
/r/MensRights09/01/13 07:31 PM
2

she's a textbook serial killer and they released her? Alright, i guess it'll take a couple more deaths for her to be treated equally. Sacrifices have to be made to ensure that women aren't treated poorly i suppose.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 06:37 PM
25

She's a model, i'm pretty sure it's appropriate for people focus on her looks. It's her job.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 06:19 PM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights09/01/13 07:39 AM
1

It seems the only point of the dog toy being mentioned is to suggest that men are no different than dogs. It's fucking disgusting, can you even imagine the outrage is the roles were reversed?
/r/MensRights09/01/13 07:01 AM
1

What should we be looking for?
/r/MensRights09/01/13 06:54 AM
0

Are you being serious right now? This has to be a troll my mind really can't wrap around how ridiculous this post is. How did this get past the moderators?
/r/MensRights09/01/13 06:50 AM
-2

Doesn't freezing sperm kill them? You should do some more research on that concept. Or you can't just be very careful on who you fuck. Very, very careful.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:21 AM
4

Men's rights: Men = Women Feminism: Men < Women
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:14 AM
1

What? Who's saying that?
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:03 AM
3

Confrontation. That's a funny thing, it has two very different sides to the same coin. Either you can be like women with no confrontation and sneer and gossip behind one anthers backs, causing unstable, untrustworthy, and often paranoid conditions. Or you can be like men and the second a problem arises you address that issue which often times leads to violence. Either way we're fucked and the issue becomes figuring out how we can find the middle ground.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 04:01 AM
11

young females are seen as temporary, leaving soon to have children. And who's fault is that? they have spent their entire lives being told that is a man's job and that no man will want you if you have a job like that I don't know where you're from but here in america being an engineer or a scientist is a widely regarded as a good thing and EVERYONE is highly encouraged to become one. Its a LIFETIME of being told that its your looks that Really matter, not your brain. I understand how looks are e…
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:50 AM
2

lol, username.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 11:01 PM
4

Except there's no indication of who's the perpetrator and who's the victim.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 10:40 PM
0

No it isn't. look closer and you'll see there is more space in between the heads and the legs on the right side than the left.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 02:42 AM
0

The little men that are supposed to represent rapists get smaller as you go from right to left. Its almost as if someone made the unreported rapists look bigger ever so subtly.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 01:06 AM
5

Our definition of sexism is the same as everyone else's. If you think differently then please indulge me.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 04:13 AM
1

The bill of rights doesn't apply to schools.
/r/MensRights07/01/13 04:04 AM
2

Using statistics to promote inequality? Oh feminists you've sunken so low.. also, so does that mean women should pay 8x more for health insurance because they cost more too?
/r/MensRights06/01/13 11:21 PM
3

I'm sure PETA would love to hear this as well. Or really anyone who deeply loves animals. Hell, if you get enough supporters of your animals then it's only another step to either receiving sympathy for you or at the very least getting rid her credibility.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 06:44 AM
1

I understand that being told what should and should not be posting is annoying and frustrating, but all those things are valid points and i'm pretty fucking sure they weren't said by feminists but rather MRA's who care enough about the movement to try and make it on topic and presentable. I know this is just reddit, but the question i'm trying to ask is do you want this to be a serious discussion group that reflects the real world MRM? Or do you want this to be a fun little sbbreddit where you s…
/r/MensRights02/01/13 10:48 PM
3

Nowhere did i advocate going through feminism for anything, all i said was that we can build the MRM stronger if we accept more people who genuinely want to help men, and that we shouldn't dismiss constructive criticism just because it comes from a feminist.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 09:46 PM
2

sorry, but where's the talk tab?
/r/MensRights02/01/13 09:07 PM
1

I agree with this paragraph, and i honestly have no idea why you're being downvoted. C'mon people this is a person who not instigating or trolling, merely an individual who supports our cause with minor criticism. Open your eyes and your mind and accept everyone/anyone who wishes to help. We're not a fucking secret club who excludes people, we're a group devoted to helping men, not complain/hate women/feminism. Remember, we're here to help men and achieve equality.
/r/MensRights02/01/13 09:02 PM
1

I wouldn't say MRM is reactionary to feminism so much as a reaction to what feminism pushes and the sexist results of third wave feminism.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 11:00 PM
1

It never made any sense to me, if you CHOOSE to drink alcohol, then any choice made under the influence is YOUR decision.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 10:06 PM
1

Then men will lose twice, getting married isn't a bad thing.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 09:43 PM
1

The legal system allows women to get away with it which in turn makes more women do it because they think they'll get away with it, and they usually do.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 09:31 PM
1

This is not only misandric but it's fucking fascist, who they fuck are we to decide who can reproduce and who can't? This is the same line of thinking as hitler.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 09:21 PM
7

This is feminist logic right here, this isn't targeted at any gender in any way. It's merely a coincidence that male happen to own more guns than women.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 09:09 PM
2

oh yeah lol
/r/MensRights26/12/12 09:02 AM
0

There's nothing wrong with cracking jokes but this isn't exactly the place for it. Also, what does SRS have to do with anything?
/r/MensRights25/12/12 11:00 PM
7

It's pretty fucked up, and pretty damn tragic, but if that baby was born it would ruin both the baby and the fathers lives.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 09:03 PM
2

Amelia Earhart always pissed me off because the only reason she's famous is because she's a woman. She did absolutely nothing, she wasn't the first person to do anything new or original, she was the first woman to fly solo across the Atlantic but then when she tried to go over the Pacific solo, which no one has ever done, she failed and died.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 08:53 PM
3

Are you being serious right now? This makes our movement look like a fucking joke, not to mention this gives SRS and other feminists fuel to add to the stereotype that we just sit around complaining about women and don't actually help men, which is what we're supposed to do.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 06:33 PM
81

What the fuck is the point of this being here? It literally does nothing to promote mens rights, and it is just downright stereotypical.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 05:07 AM
5

I wouldn't call it revenge, no revenge would be if you did the same thing back to her. I'd say it's more like justice.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 05:02 AM
1

There's no way this is real, and even if it was i'd hardly consider feminism to blame, however it does bring up some good points. For example, how easy it is for a woman to simply accuse a man of some horrendous act without the slightest of evidence, and how you could not say the same if the roles were reversed.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 03:58 AM
1

That doesn't help anyone, i'd rather see it removed than to have an equally offensive shirt on the market.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 02:04 AM
2

telling a rapist not to rape will do absolutely nothing, what is hard hard to understand about that? Rapist are sick people who clearly don't adhere to any line of morals.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 06:04 PM
2

Personality she's just fun to be around but at the same time is quiet and timid, and looks she's thin, blonde, and cute.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 04:30 AM
3

Currently dating a feminist right now, though to be honest her views are more egalitarian oriented. But just someone to talk to makes the best relationship, someone once said that you should marry your best friend and i'd agree.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 04:22 AM
1

I think it would still be best if we didn't treat genders differently, yea it does a lot of good but it promotes the thinking that men and women are different on a societal level. Which i guess we are, but that limits freedom in a way.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 04:15 AM
5

Jesus Christ these guys sound like fat girls who want a guy to like them for their personality. Let's face it, men and women are attracted to very specific, and sometimes different things, and we should understand our differences and learn from them. Women like confidence and the reason these poor guys can't get a girl is because they don't have any! They don't make any moves that imply them wanted to be in a romantic relationship, and it doesn't make any sense to get pissed. Being nice is fanta…
/r/MensRights23/12/12 04:10 AM
8

stooping down to the feminists level doesn't do us any good.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 03:37 AM
3

huh?
/r/MensRights23/12/12 12:19 AM
2

Not really, no. Why, is there some stigma against them or something?
/r/MensRights22/12/12 09:23 PM
6

If the roles were reversed we'd be pretty pissed too.
/r/MensRights22/12/12 09:22 PM
3

These comments are making me confused, it's a good thing that things are going gender-neutral right? Once car insurance gets equalized i think we can be happy with this.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 09:04 PM
6

He should have recorded her saying all those things. Video and audio surveillance is a must.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 07:01 PM
5

What help? What help do men have that women don't?
/r/MensRights21/12/12 06:55 PM
2

How fast are they rising? Are they rising fast enough that it warrants ignoring 77% of the other HIV victims?
/r/MensRights21/12/12 07:10 AM
1

To be fair, for Noway's legal system that's actually pretty harsh. To put it in perspective, Breivik only got 27 years.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 02:47 AM
5

It's understandable for a private pool to do this, but a public pool? Doesn't make any sense, if women want to preferential treatment then they should pay money for it, not waste tax dollars.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 02:18 AM
1

A lot of sentences need to be rephrased, too full of hatred.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 02:16 AM
19

It's not a literal comparison, it's just pointing out the flaw in logic.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 11:23 PM
2

Why?
/r/MensRights19/12/12 06:57 PM
1

but was there sex? was she just lying on the floor? why would they claim rape penetration never happened?
/r/MensRights16/12/12 07:47 PM
2

Wait, i'm confused, did someone have sex with her? Because it sounds like rape, but what i'm reading from the article is that she was just covered in vomit and no penetration occurred. Please correct me if i'm wrong, this passage doesn't seem to be clear about what happened.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 06:33 AM
5

What would be the alternative?
/r/MensRights12/12/12 03:05 AM
1

Does anyone know how many confirmed false rape reports are filed each year?
/r/MensRights12/12/12 03:02 AM
6

"In reaching his decision, Higinbotham took into account Smith’s ability to make judgments, at the time of the crash, was at a nine-year-old level." It's official, women can get away with killing people because of their child-like behavior and actions.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:02 PM
0

I agree, we shouldn't be putting women down, we should be raising men up. Both genders are equal and should be treated as such, which is the whole point of our movement.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 01:24 AM
4

Alright, there are a lot of countries that have it worse than America when regarding military service. I know that Switzerland requires all males to enter military training once they reach a certain age for 2 years (I think) and when they get out they keep their gun and uniform just in case they decide to mobilize. Also, the Israeli military requires ALL citizens to partake in military service. And from what I've heard their training is hard as fuck too. EDIT: also, Switzerland has always been n…
/r/MensRights05/12/12 11:07 AM
0

I know in a few states, New York for example, automatically add you to the selective service once you get your drivers licence. So who knows, maybe your in one of those lucky states.
/r/MensRights05/12/12 11:04 AM
8

A lot of great points were made but didn't have sufficient evidence to back it up. For example, yes men don't want to get married as much as they used to, but why? Marriage laws, child custody laws, rape laws, and especially divorce laws should have been cited as reasons for this percentage drop.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 08:57 PM
1

Take her to court, if she does it once she'll probobly do it again. If it's on her record that she's a liar you'll protect another man from the same pain you went through.
/r/MensRights18/11/12 12:09 AM
13

How did this get published? how? i'm simply baffled, this article is a joke. This seems like it was written by a 15 ear old girl whose boyfriend just broke up with her.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 06:43 PM
19

"break the glass ceiling that continues to bar female talent from top positions in Europe’s biggest companies." I'm very confused. what exactly is "barring" these women from achieving top positions? are there any laws that say a women can't hold these positions? Are people not giving these positions purely because they're a woman? What companies would gain from that? HOW could a company compete with other companies if they have a system that doesn't hire people based on merit or ability?
/r/MensRights14/11/12 09:37 PM
3

That was the same philosophy during the Vietnam war, and the government clearly did not give a fuck. The government WILL fine you, arrest you, or deport you. Probably not deport you but if the U.S. is so desperate to institute a draft i'm not sure how low they'll stoop. EDIT: also, their desperation will quickly force them to draft women as well. Also, i heard from an unreliable source that the most recent draft proposal included women, but because women didn't sign up it'll be difficult to enfo…
/r/MensRights14/11/12 08:15 AM
3

I think it's sad that they decided to gives rights to one select group over the whole group, on over such minuscule matters. It's truly unfortunate that they look at a group of people who've been discriminated against and say only the women matter. on top of that, it seems the only thing won here was the woman's right over the man's money.
/r/MensRights06/11/12 09:01 PM
28

It was a satirical piece that was savagely sarcastic, i found it distasteful but hardly illegal. What happened to the first amendment? Has anyone heard of The Anarchist Cookbook? it's a book that tells you in VERY detailed steps how to make homemade bombs, guns, and other ridiculously dangerous things. That is legal and can be purchased anywhere online and in no way is that book illegal, so why is this flyer? What should have happened is that they take down the flyer and if the students continue…
/r/MensRights24/10/12 09:05 PM
2

the implication is that moms are incapable of watching their children. personally, i find it more offensive to women than discriminatory to men.
/r/MensRights21/10/12 11:15 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter