TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HumanNumber348 Archive

View 3 posts and 2,300 comments by HumanNumber348 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,300 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

I think the number of women who would say yes to that would surprise you.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/23 01:44 PM
1

Mate, you know you are wrong, just take the L, it’s the best you can do in this situation. My dude Jordan answered with one syllable to a contestant for the title of most simple, clearly stated question ever asked. Trying to bend his words like this is a ridiculously hopeless endeavour, and it just makes you look psychotic.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/23 09:39 PM
2

https://youtu.be/S9dZSlUjVls 9:25 “Do you feel like a serious woman who does not want sexual harassment in the workplace, do you feel like if she wears makeup in the workplace that she is somewhat being hypocritical?” “Yeah.” “Okay.” “I do think that.”
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/23 01:52 PM
2

My dude, the interview I am referencing is explicitly about sexual harassment. That was the term that was used. By Jordan Peterson, not me. That is not what he says, Haha yes it is. You can’t win this one, my friend. I can link video footage of him saying exactly that.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/23 01:00 PM
6

I love Jordan “women who don’t want sexual harassment in the workplace but wear make up are hypocritical” Peterson.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/23 04:59 PM
8

“Women say they are fine with my preferences as long as I am not misogynistic about it, but what if I am misogynistic?”
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/23 09:19 PM
2

Are we unironically doing the 👏More👏female👏[horrible thing]👏 meme? We obviously shouldn’t try to kill more women to even out a gender ratio, we should just kill fewer people overall.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 09:50 PM
18

Women are only treated “better” by virtue of being treated more like children. Women are seen as weak, incompetent, emotional, unintelligent etc., and as a result, they have fewer expectations placed on them and people are more willing to protect them. It’s called benevolent sexism, and it does come with some pretty significant privileges. It’s the same kind of privileges children have. But while being a child with no responsibilities is fun, at the end of the day, I think most capable adults pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/23 09:39 PM
6

K. Not the point. A lot of women just don’t care enough to put in the work it takes to have sex with other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 10:08 PM
9

Or it’s Gen Z girls who just don’t care enough to chase guys.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/23 09:45 PM
1

Ok. I watched a horror movie yesterday.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/03/23 12:05 PM
2

On the other hand, you also see a lot of borderline fetishisation of mlm relationships (fujoshi phenomenon) among certain straight women. It’s complicated. Is it really homophobia? I don’t think men are NOT homophobic for being much more amenable to their romantic partner being bi. Well, you can be homophobic in different ways. And lesbophobia often manifests itself in different ways than homophobia against gay men. My theory is that something is happening in the lovely overlap between toxic mas…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/23 10:20 PM
9

It’s called homophobia. There’s no reason to talk about it as something inherent to women’s sexuality, it’s absolutely not, it’s just bigotry.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/23 01:59 PM
–

you’d see I compared the dynamic, not the idea of women and dogs being the same. Ooooh, never mind then, that’s totally different! If you think the truth is provocative then I don’t know what to tell you, young champion. The truth isn’t provocative. Your bullshit is.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/23 01:28 PM
–

What’s weird about deliberately trying to knock down other people’s optimistic and romantic views on love by posting ridiculously provocative comments comparing women to dogs, because you are a broken miserable cynic who hates when other people have what you can’t have? Idk man, you have a point, that’s pretty normal.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/23 01:00 PM
–

Ooh, someone is being a weirdo out of spite, I see.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/23 12:10 PM
–

No, that’s called “being a man”. Being a man is a red flag, got it. ;)
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/23 12:03 PM
3

Because I have no idea what it means. “Option of inexperience”??? Translate it to proper English if you want me to respond to it. E: Dude, you’re on a debate subreddit. Just leave if you don’t want to play the game, blocking people is weirdo behaviour.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/23 09:22 PM
3

How is it hyperbolic?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/23 09:17 PM
3

Lmao. In your mind, does this logic apply to masturbation too? Do women become desensitised to it after ringing the devil’s doorbell more than 87 times, or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/02/23 05:53 PM
1

Everything lol. Do you have the same opinion about couples adopting dogs? After all, the man is investing resources in offspring that isn’t biologically his. Such cuckoldry.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/01/23 09:21 AM
1

Yeah lol, and?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/23 05:09 PM
6

Ah yes, if you want to take care of a child it basically means you have an open relationship. Wtf dude. 😭
/r/PurplePillDebate11/01/23 06:51 AM
18

“Women eat avocado all the time, yet when I grab random women and forcefully stuff avocado down their throats, they complain?? Tsk tsk hypocrisy knows no bounds.”
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 10:01 PM
1

I’m pretty sure they have more important things to think about than women they share nationality with having sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/01/23 11:05 AM
1

Women can get casual sex whenever they want, we aren’t denying that. But lots of women can’t find love. and the fact that if you have more options by probability alone you’re bound to like one. They have pretty much the same number of LTR options, though. Women’s options are just buried in options for casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/22 09:54 AM
1

It isn’t necessarily harder for men, though. At least, the fact that women appear to have more options is not proof that men have it harder.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/22 09:45 AM
1

The analogy was a little exaggerated. There are small puddles with good water in the dessert, and there are a few rafts with water jugs floating around in the ocean. But point is, finding meaningful relationships is difficult for both men and women.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/22 09:37 AM
2

Men and women have a roughly equal interest in finding long term relationships. The only reason women appear to have more options is because their dating pools are flooded with men who just want casual sex, a thing women are rarely that interested in. So yes, most of the options women have are bad fits.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/22 09:28 AM
2

Men are looking for water to drink in a desert. Women are looking for water to drink in the middle of the ocean. Just because women technically have a bigger pool of water to choose from, it doesn’t necessarily mean they have it easier.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/12/22 08:55 AM
0

My god, if this comment was written by a woman about men… The pill crowd would be screaming and sobbing about AFBB settling boohooo yada yada within seconds, lmfao.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/22 09:52 AM
6

The logic is that men and women have an equally strong desire for relationships, but men want casual sex more. So while men and women have an equal number of options for meaningful relationships, if you are a woman, those options are buried in all the offers from men seeking casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/12/22 09:40 AM
1

the issue is that "love" is a subjective buzzword that women use to hide immortality. Oh no ladies, he figured it out. 😳 🧛🏻‍♀️ love it giving. if you dont want to give sex for the sale of SELFLESS pleasing you dont love that man. Is there a limit to this logic? Do you have to do literally everything your lover desires without question? If I wanted my man to cut his arm off because it’d bring me amusement, does he not love me if he refuses to do it? Love is about giving, right? because a woman do…
/r/PurplePillDebate29/11/22 06:35 PM
1

you must exchange them otherwise your trying to play someone. its a service. See, herein lies the problem. You are insisting that a romantic relationship has to be this hyper transactional nonsense where a man provides love and a woman provides sex, and most women do not accept that premise. They want a relationship where each partner provides love and gets love. If you don’t want that, there’s a fundamental incompatibility that can’t be fixed and is nobody’s fault. You just want fundamentally d…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/22 11:24 PM
1

“You have to fuck me on the first date. Think of the children.”
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/22 11:06 PM
1

Which answers my original question. Apparently you DO live in a weird world where a significant amount of men have more than one girlfriend?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/11/22 11:04 PM
2

Let’s say you run out of toilet paper and the only toilet paper-ish thing nearby is an artist’s handmade paper artwork that is being sold for a few hundred dollars at an auction. You, being desperate to wipe your ass, buy the artwork. While it’s definitely some expensive toilet paper, and while it’s an unfortunate situation, it is not the fault of the person selling the artwork, is it? They are just selling it for what it’s worth. You just don’t value it as it’s supposed to be valued. Are they e…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 07:57 PM
1

So, I’m supposed to believe that your average high value man would choose to jump from relationship to relationship (remember, not hookups) with low value women instead of with high value women? Also, this is what you said: the females always have a bf more often Which contradicts that.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 06:49 PM
2

Abuse, lmfao. Women are plainly offering romantic relationships with everything that entails. No hidden intentions, everything is on the table. Tell me what’s immoral about that. your dodging the blame Of course. Because I don’t think the blame is warranted. That’s the entire point lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 06:42 PM
2

Do you live in a world where a significant amount of men have more than one girlfriend?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 05:38 PM
1

I see no problem lol. I think a lot of women would be understanding. I certainly would.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 05:33 PM
3

Lol, tf do you mean? It's such straightforward line of logic. If you don't think relationships are worth it, then don't do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 05:32 PM
3

> because a relationship is a huge COST for a man My friend, I got an easy solution for you; if you don't like relationships, don't enter a fucking relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 05:08 PM
3

Gotta love the equation of “sympathy” and “willingness to fuck” lmao. average women are told to hold out and wait for Prince Charming because you deserve it and are beautiful. The narrative changes every time I get back on this subreddit lol. I thought the whole problem with the blue pill is that it cuddles young boys with nice fairy tale delusions?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/11/22 11:45 AM
1

This implies that men in general have higher value than women. Unless you think high value women don’t participate in dating?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/11/22 06:28 AM
1

People continue to grow after they are legal adults. I’m almost 18. I sure hope I won’t be the same person in 10 years. That would be a very pathetic 28 year old. Let’s take another extreme example. A young person was addicted to heroin but has overcome her addiction and no longer wants to take drugs with her new friends. Would this decision annoy you?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 04:03 PM
1

Your world view leaves literally no room for letting people grow. I played with dolls with my friends a lot when I was a small child. If I don’t want to do that today with my current friends, would the inconsistency annoy you?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 03:51 PM
1

Even if they have a perfectly rational reason for behaving the way they do?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 03:44 PM
1

I value it because the lack of it makes my life less enjoyable. How??
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 03:41 PM
1

What do you define as “consistency”, and why do you value it?
/r/PurplePillDebate06/11/22 11:56 AM
6

There’s probably a correlation there lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/11/22 08:51 AM
7

People are not fully developed at 18.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/11/22 12:34 PM
1

> I saw this study once Cool, where?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 02:40 PM
3

Lol. Remember this post next time the red pillers in here are screaming about AFBB and women settling.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/11/22 02:33 PM
0

People be like that. We are all mainly driven by our self interest. You are no exception. It’s not like people don’t care about morals at all, though, they are just a little polluted by natural selfishness, to varying degrees, consciously or subconsciously.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 10:14 PM
1

If you think the concept of arguing from morality is sad, you are gonna have a depressing life, mate.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 08:28 PM
0

The use morals to push the feminine imperative. Bravo, Sherlock, what a revelation. 👏
/r/PurplePillDebate29/10/22 08:20 PM
1

Thanks. I consider myself a feminist too, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 02:33 PM
1

Lefties Common values HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHHAHAHAHAAAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAJAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAHHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAA
/r/PurplePillDebate27/10/22 02:12 PM
1

It has a great central message, but the implicit weirdness of “it’s somebody else’s turn” and “just a pretty face” distracts the reader. Could be saved with a quick edit, but right now it’s a 4/10.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/10/22 06:22 PM
5

Shove that internalised homophobia up your a and seek out women who accept your sexuality. Please.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 08:51 PM
1

Yeah you’re right. That’s why I added the clarification, but Reddit care resources bot is probably already on its way anyway lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 08:39 PM
2

“I should fucking kill myself” I have never been suicidal, but the lil voice likes to be dramatic. 🤷
/r/PurplePillDebate24/10/22 08:03 PM
1

You said that prostitution is a mini-relationship. Most women find that attitude repulsive. just because it’s not fun isn’t the same as saying “unwilling” I meant “unwilling” as in not wanting to have sex. Which seems like allowed usage according to the Google definition: “not ready, eager, or prepared to do something.” “not eager”
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 04:46 PM
2

I’m not saying that’s the perspective I’m saying that a relationship is mostly a longer version because most guys like it or not want to smash.. That is the perspective I’m talking about. Believe it or not, most guys actually feel love for their partners and value them for more than just the sex they provide. Your perspective on this is both uncommon and undesirable. Most women want to avoid people like you, which leads them to rejecting Johns. and why would you assume the person is unwilling If…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 02:05 PM
3

cause it’s a just the short version of a relationship This is exactly what a lot of women have a problem with. It tells them something about a person’s attitude towards relationships, sex, and love that they see such a superficial interaction with an unwilling partner to be even comparable to an actual romantic relationship. I don’t think we should shame men for doing it either, but I can empathise with women who don’t want to associate with men with that kind of perspective on human interaction…
/r/PurplePillDebate23/10/22 10:36 AM
5

Totally agree, but individuals can’t do a lot. You won’t get much out of calling a girl a bitch for rejecting your 5’11 stature.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/22 02:21 PM
5

Because you can’t just change who you are attracted to, but you CAN change whether you are actively being a piece of shit to other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/22 01:55 PM
4

Since you guys love EvPsych so much; doesn’t it make sense that women become emotionally attached to men who show them that they’re willing to provide? Having a man who can invest money in you and your offspring means you have much higher chances of effective reproduction. Maybe women evolved to find generous men sexually attractive?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/22 01:38 PM
0

As if men are different lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/22 01:10 PM
5

Everyone is having less sex, because we socialise less in general nowadays. Men are just more upset about this development than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/10/22 11:36 AM
0

That makes no sense. The analogy is being told from the perspective of the owner, a god that determines objective value, not from the perspective of a key/man. A key doesn’t care about how many other keys can open a lock; its only objective is just to open the lock. The purpose of the analogy is pretty obvious. OP got it right. If you want an analogy for men’s desire, there are tons of them out there you can use instead, like the one about cars and mileage lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 08:38 AM
3

The premise is really that women guard sex. Men try to get it. In general terms we know this is true. Only descriptively. If you think this is how men and women should behave, we are once again back to begging the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 08:23 AM
2

So men are settling. 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 08:19 AM
4

Lol. There’s a pretty significant difference between simply stating your preference, like “I want my future wife to have the same views on sex as me” and then making up a series of outrageously bad analogies with the goal of demonstrating that the people who don’t fit your preferences are worth less as people.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/10/22 08:16 AM
22

I’m not sexually attracted to men, but as someone who’s done a ton of research on the topic; no, women generally aren’t sexually aroused by male bodies alone. They may admire you aesthetically, and your looks can work as a powerful catalyst to the sexual desire that may happen as a result of your actions, but it doesn’t do much on its own. I don’t understand why this would make you sad, though. Isn’t it nice to imagine that, when a woman desires you sexually, she desires you as a whole, includin…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/10/22 11:29 AM
4

Why would a HVM tell a woman he loves her and want to stay faithful to her if he doesn’t mean it? I guess there are some very irrational, shortsighted, low EQ guys out there who would do it out of pure stupidity, but it’s not exactly something most people do, since it makes no logical sense.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 10:28 PM
6

Nah, it’s the rational thing too. Cheating causes unnecessary drama when one could just leave.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 09:58 PM
3

?? They do want HVM ?? They want a HVM who doesn’t cheat.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 09:56 PM
4

He realises he has changed his mind. So the rational thing to do is to either open the relationship or break up.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 05:53 PM
4

If a “high value man” wanted to have sex with many different people, he could find an open relationship. Isn’t it reasonable to assume that a person who voluntarily agrees to monogamy also intends to be monogamous?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/10/22 05:40 PM
1

That makes no sense. How many “points” you have exclusively comes down to how concise you tend to be. I only have one requirement: “I have to love him”.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/10/22 02:31 PM
2

Men get shamed too and called ugly and wanting a girl out of their league, Not any more than fat single moms on tinder get shamed for only wanting tall millionaires with six packs. Also, the “shaming” in these cases has less to do with the preferences on their own, and more to do with these people acting cringe and delusional about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 05:53 PM
1

Nah, this works the other way around. Women don’t own it because they are shamed for it.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/10/22 04:47 PM
1

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/social-instincts/201507/when-men-arent-good-looking-they-think?amp
/r/PurplePillDebate07/10/22 09:08 AM
8

What data lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/10/22 12:47 PM
1

How do you know how women feel?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/10/22 06:45 AM
1

What makes you think women aren’t like this, and can’t feel unconditional love?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 09:30 PM
1

Couldn’t you choose to just not do really bad things?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 01:32 PM
1

I find that hard to believe lol. Are you willing to go further? Let’s say the only way she can be sexually satisfied is by getting fucked in the ass by two guys in front of you. Like, that’s the one thing that would make her the most happy. Would you agree to it?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 12:22 PM
1

So if your girl, who’s unable to have sex, got fat, old, and ugly, and wouldn’t be able to find someone better than you, you would stay, forever, no matter what?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 10:21 AM
1

What if they are “not going to be able to be a good partner” because of it?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 10:11 AM
1

What is stopping women from claiming that they still love their husbands after leaving him because he lost his job or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/09/22 04:35 AM
2

Is breaking up with a woman because she won’t suck your dick putting her needs above your own, always unconditionally? What you describe as love literally just does not exist. We are biologically programmed to put our own needs first. To achieve our one goal; reproducing. If we “love” someone, i.e. value their happiness, it’s because their happiness helps us achieve that goal.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/22 09:24 PM
2

In what ways do women not feel unconditional love?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/22 09:11 PM
3

Would you continue loving a woman if she stopped having sex with you?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/09/22 09:02 PM
1

You are obviously allowed to want that, but why on earth would you? 🤨
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/22 12:54 PM
13

It’s so fucking far from the same thing lol. One expresses a simple sexual preference, the other involves outright hostility towards a group of people. There’s a world of difference between simply stating that you are more into some people sexually, and showing that you see the people you aren’t into as inherently inferior and not worthy of respect. Let’s make it a little more obvious: “Y’know, I’ve always been really attracted to very pale skin, I find it very hot”. “Ew, I won’t date [insert ra…
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 09:05 PM
12

Not unless you are VERY autistic lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 07:25 PM
58

There’s a thin line between “just a preference” and “asshole”, and the difference lies in whether you are being an asshole: “Eww, I would never date a used up whore.” ❌ “I would prefer if my partner and I had the same values surrounding sex.” ✅ Eeew, are short men even men??“ ❌ “I would prefer if my partner is taller than me.” ✅
/r/PurplePillDebate26/09/22 02:33 PM
6

Men still sit on the vast majority of resources and opportunities; if women had the upper hand and could use their sexuality as easily as you claim, this wouldn't be the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/09/22 02:37 PM
1

We are talking about serious dating too.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/09/22 08:38 AM
1

Idk, I hate biology, but serotonin, oxytocin, vasopressin etc. ig.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 08:06 PM
1

In what way would you be hurt? Is it really just because of the inconvenience of having to find a new model? Familial love is different, you're bound together for life - like or or not. It’s not. Some of the same chemicals are involved when we bond with our kids and parents and our romantic partners. If you don’t feel this kind of connection with your girlfriend, that’s unusual.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 03:59 PM
1

Indeed, but no one mentioned Disney love except for you. If you purely look at the feelings described in the original comment, do you not relate? We assume the other person is exactly as compatible with you as your current girlfriend. If you wouldn’t have any negative feelings in this hypothetical situation, I’d recommend you check out r/aroallo. The vast vast majority people would feel some way about losing a person they love, even they could learn to love the new person too. Would you feel dif…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/09/22 03:27 PM
1

I don’t see the contradiction. You can adore another person and want to see them happy while also being sexually non monogamous. Not everyone sees sex as always intertwined with love. You said you were in a relationship, right? Since you implied that sex and having children are your only reasons for being with her; if your girlfriend got replaced by a random girl who was just as loyal and just as physically attractive, would you care? If not, why?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 08:09 PM
1

So, now you agree that men feel love in the way the other person described it?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/09/22 02:02 PM
1

I’d like to see that evidence. “Exercising options”, as in having sex with a lot of people, doesn’t necessarily mean you can’t feel romantic love too. People may feel love for one person while feeling sexual attraction for a lot of other people.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/09/22 09:33 PM
1

“I’m like that, so everyone else must be like that too!!” Bro, you are not the norm.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 04:43 PM
1

Literally all our feelings, thoughts and experiences are the result of weird brain-chemistry. If love isn’t special, nothing in life is.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 12:03 PM
1

r/aromantic?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/22 11:42 AM
0

statistical reality The population is 50/50 men and women. Unless having you as a partner is worse than having no one, it should be perfectly possible to find someone.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 09:23 PM
1

My parents were working class and I never was addicted to unhealthy processed food. Congratulations. Parents buy their kids McDonald's every day because it's easy Yes. When you work several jobs and take care of several kids, it’s normal to be fucking tired. It can be tempting to opt for the easy option, especially when it’s cheap. Every woman I've talked to in the US who is fat thinks she is gorgeous. And the weight loss industry is worth billions and billions of dollars. What you have supposed…
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 07:59 PM
5

Working class America is dependant on unhealthy processed food. That’s undeniably the number one reason for your obesity epidemic. The “beautiful at every size” movement is not very widespread and happened quite recently. You are delusional if you think it has had any serious impact on our culture yet.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 07:46 PM
3

American women all just randomly happen to have less self control than women outside the US. High iq analysis over here.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 07:25 PM
9

Oh gotcha, I misunderstood your comment. You are still wrong, though. And I hope the universe will prove that to you someday.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 11:20 AM
43

It’s almost funny how the men and women here say the exact same things about each other: Men are emotionless flesh robots who only pretend to feel love to access pussy, women are emotionless flesh robots who only pretend to feel love to get resources. I likely won’t convince you, but as a girl, I can tell you from first hand experience that I am, in fact, a human, that I do, in fact, feel genuine romantic love like most other humans do.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/09/22 10:06 AM
1

There’s nothing wrong with Hitler comparisons, it’s the perfect hyperbolic analogy. If it’s made properly, it’s just as valid as any other type of analogy. Stop letting your impressionable mind believe any lie the media tell you like a good little slave. Someone has read too many YA dystopias lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/09/22 05:29 AM
1

Do you actually believe most men feel genuine love for the “bunch”? Even if they do, which I doubt, men have limited resources. There will always be a favourite woman who will get invested in more. This woman is likely to be the popular girl.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 08:23 PM
0

Lol, how is it projection? Both men and women prefer high value partners, i.e, partners that will give them the most successful offspring. Most people desire monogamy, so given the option, men will choose the high value woman over the bullied outsider. Just like how women will choose the high value bad boy over the bullied outsider.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 08:07 PM
3

I won’t take it seriously, because it’s obviously a bad faith question. It’s like asking for proof that Hitler was antisemitic lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 07:57 PM
-1

True, but irrelevant. No woman cares whether you are willing to sacrifice 2 minutes of your time putting your dick in her, because sperm is basically worthless biologically. What actually matters is whether a man is in love with her or not. Translated to EvPsych language; whether a man is willing to invest resources in her. That’s what’s actually valuable here. And men rarely fall in love with the nerdy outsiders. They want the popular mean girls, because popular girls have a better chance of pr…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 07:47 PM
0

Bullies are generally higher up in social hierarchies, as that’s how they get away with bullying people. Coincidentally, having high social standing is also a sexually attractive trait. There’s a correlative relationship between the two, not a casual one. And I doubt men and women are that different in this aspect.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 05:03 PM
5

Lol
/r/PurplePillDebate13/09/22 04:30 PM
3

I’m not sure what your point is. Do you disagree that a man’s pool of potential girlfriends typically gets older when he gets older?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 01:31 PM
5

Most men do not have enough money to attract 20 year old gold diggers. The numbers don’t lie, the vast, vast majority of older men are in relationships with older women. Young women do not want old wrinkly boyfriends, the rich-and-powerful-people-in-Hollywood exception doesn’t make the rule.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 01:25 PM
7

Men date younger women pretty much unanimously, Only by a few years. According to Wikipedia, 90% of people date within 9 years of their own age. 77% within 5 years. And this includes relationships between old people, where age differences don’t mean as much. 50 year olds simply aren’t getting with women when they presumably peak in their early 20’s. Mid twenties to early thirties boys are. Which means that an average dude’s girlfriend from back in the day in his twenties will have been hotter th…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 01:00 PM
1

Yeah, and?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 11:37 AM
1

It doesn’t matter at all to me. Why would it matter?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 11:25 AM
0

The past doesn’t matter on its own. But the underlying reasons for why the past happened are very relevant. If a person has raped kids in the past, that’s a pretty good indicator that the guy has some serious issues that probably haven’t magically disappeared from their brain just because a lot of time has passed.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 11:18 AM
3

The last time I was ‘round these parts, it was widely accepted that women lose their value as they age. Since most people date people their own age, wouldn’t men have to date worse and worse women as time goes on? Meanwhile, according to TRP, men age like fine wine… So wouldn’t reality actually be the reverse?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/09/22 11:10 AM
2

Haha it’s understandable. People here can sometimes get a little defensive.
/r/ExRedPill28/08/22 06:54 PM
8

Oh, that’s not what I meant, you can have respect for people you hook up with! But casual sex is still casual sex. Definitionally, it doesn’t involve “unconditional love”. Also, all love is conditional. Even the love you feel for your parents or children. After all, humans only feel love because it happened to be an evolutionary advantage, and if associating with a person doesn’t benefit you, it is simply not advantageous to feel love for them. I don’t think this fact devalues love, though, at l…
/r/ExRedPill28/08/22 05:24 PM
14

Why do you care whether the women feel “unconditional love” if they are just a quick nut?
/r/ExRedPill28/08/22 09:45 AM
3

Hypergamy is when men are horny. Why do you people always have to make up new scary words for the most obvious shit in the world?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/08/22 12:14 PM
1

Is sex actually the way you feel love, or is the sex itself just the only thing you want?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/22 09:48 PM
1

Do you actually feel love through sex, or is the sex itself just the only thing you want?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/08/22 09:47 PM
0

The people in here sure do spend a lot of energy whining about how much you totally don’t care about this person. 🤣
/r/AntiFeminists04/08/22 03:46 PM
1

I'm too autistic to get any kind of girlfriend... Same. 🤷 I can't imagine woman paying really any money for sex seeing as they are used to getting it as easy as drinking water. They would also be cuddling me, cook food for me, covering me in blankets at bedtime, singing me good night songs and talk about how much they love me. 🥺 That’s a bit more difficult to find than water.
/r/AntiFeminists01/08/22 09:26 PM
1

True. But the guy was specifically talking about women.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/22 09:19 PM
0

A lot of women can develop attraction over time.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/22 08:51 PM
1

It sounds like what you mostly seek is validation. If I was you, I would heavily focus on mentally disconnecting your self worth from your physical looks. Just because the casual sex guy conforms better to beauty standards doesn’t mean he is better than you. Certainly not in the eyes of your girl; the beta thing is pure bullshit. Believe it or not, women fall in love with their partners too, and those rose tinted glasses can make you the Chaddest of Chads in their eyes.
/r/ExRedPill01/08/22 08:48 PM
1

It’s probably correct that men generally have to be more physically attractive to get a lot of casual sex than they have to be to get relationships. So in that sense, I can see how it’s more validating to be able to get casual sex; simply because it’s more difficult. But keep in mind that just because it’s more difficult doesn’t mean it’s more meaningful. You don’t have to worry about being a “beta”, if that’s what’s holding you back from relationships. I guarantee, if you find a good girlfriend…
/r/ExRedPill01/08/22 08:20 PM
–

It’s not about expecting sex or expecting relationships. If a man just so happens to realise that he and his date are incompatible after they had sex, and he explains so politely, no reasonable person would be mad. Likewise so if a woman happens to realise that she is no longer interested after a date where the man paid. It’s the dishonesty and lying that people dislike.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/22 12:36 PM
–

You do it under a false pretence. The goal of paying for food is not the food itself, but to create a more romantic moment with a person you want to get to know. And there’s nothing romantic about a foodie call.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/22 12:28 PM
–

How do you feel about women who use men for free food? After all, men willingly pay for dinner just to be romantic, without the guarantee that it will lead to anything. Does that mean men can’t be angry about women foodie calling them?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/22 11:51 AM
1

Feminist are the most worthless of partners because they will constantly belittle the man and undermine his natural authority and biological imperative to be the leader and master in the relationship. So women are worthless because we won’t abide by every word uttered by you, our divine lord and saviour? I mean, fair enough I guess lol. Can’t you find some equally kinky chick to live out your… “biological imperative” with? I'm sure some woman will be fine with a BoyfriendBot, however what will r…
/r/AntiFeminists01/08/22 10:30 AM
1

Love is a chemical reaction and not real That phrase is outstandingly idiotic lol. Literally everything in our brains is chemical reactions. If love is fake and worthless because it’s “just a chemical reaction”, the logical conclusion is that everything; hunger, sleepiness, sadness, happiness, and life itself are all equally worthless. It’s fair if that’s your philosophical perspective, but it makes zero sense to specifically single out love as fake. As you may have noted, I’m a feminist gorl. B…
/r/AntiFeminists31/07/22 10:47 AM
6

Always keep in mind the gender ratios on dating apps when reading stuff like this. Women don’t have these filters in place because they see 5’11 men as undatable. They have them because they can.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 10:29 PM
1

Why is it necessary to prevent women from having abortions?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 09:24 PM
1

Why shouldn’t we try to remove unnecessary responsibilities from women? Why are you deliberately trying to make life more difficult for half the population?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/22 11:06 AM
-1

And what exactly does that principle have to do with women complaining about unattractive men? 🧐
/r/AntiFeminists29/07/22 10:20 PM
-3

Oh no, men who see women and love as replaceable with sex robots will no longer give out their precious attention, how will women ever recover? 🥺 no self respecting man is ever going to be their beta bucks pay pig …Implying that women only need men for money. Which implies that the world will collapse for women when men go MGTOW because women will get a little less money to spend each month? This is incoherent. 😂
/r/AntiFeminists29/07/22 03:58 PM
-8

Is hypergamy when you are more attracted to attractive people? Red pillers are real geniuses.
/r/AntiFeminists29/07/22 03:41 PM
1

But are these policies in place where women aren’t underrepresented too?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 10:25 AM
1

If there are women only grants and scholarships in places where women aren’t underrepresented, that’s very stupid. I haven’t seen it, though. I’m not sure I understand your second point.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 10:10 AM
4

the definition of a cuck. Getting off to seeing your romantic partner get fucked by another dude?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 10:07 AM
-1

The kind of policies the guy was talking about pretty much exclusively exist in industries where men outnumber women to an insane degree. These policies are just small attempts at making these places less intimidating for women. They aren’t female privilege. Women in STEM don’t exactly have it better than the men because of these policies.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 09:57 AM
-2

You and your sister now have an equal number of m&ms. None of you are privileged.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 09:31 AM
1

Top commenter thinks affirmative action is proof of female privilege.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 09:10 AM
-1

What the hell does any of this even mean? Your sister has 5 m&ms and you have 8 m&ms. Your parents see this and think it’s unfair that you have more m&ms than your sister. Your parents give your sister 3 more m&ms. You get angry because your sister is privileged. Your sister thinks you are retarded.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 08:52 AM
1

People with poor mental health are still capable of noticing how other people perceive them, though. How would you explain how both trans men and trans women experience feeling more alienated by women when seen as male?
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 08:38 AM
0

Half of the privileges you are listing are literally just attempts at fixing existing inequality. Calling that a “privilege” would be like saying that having more awareness campaigns about female rapists in an attempt to combat existing biases and stereotypes means male rapists are privileged. Your point about only fans is the most brain dead shit I have encountered all day. 🤣 Your only valid points are the ones about rape and prison sentences. Those are legitimate ways in which men are disadvan…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 08:04 AM
1

Did you watch it? It’s good, and not just about JP.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/07/22 07:30 AM
0

I’ll just drop this: https://youtu.be/LKc_8fT6pGc
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 06:39 PM
1

Unconscious biases. People who are in charge of hiring workers aren’t perfect. If they believe women are worse at a job than men are, they will obviously prefer hiring a man.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 06:36 PM
6

This contradicts literally all evidence lmao. Women form the primary social attachments to their man, where men have it more balanced out between their woman and the camaraderie of other men. ?? It’s a whole trope that the man loses his outlet for emotional support after a breakup while the woman eats ice cream with friends. I don’t know where you got this from. Also, I’m not talking about friendships exclusively. It’s nice to have complete strangers in public smile and compliment you and be wil…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 11:01 AM
5

The main advantage of being a woman is the friendliness you receive from other women. The benefits from the other stuff you mentioned are highly overestimated.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 09:43 AM
5

It is easy for women to do. But people don’t want to do it.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 08:22 AM
5

TRIPLE DIGITS?? Wtf are u on dude? 😂 People have less sex post-OLD btw.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/22 07:59 AM
3

If you won’t love them, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 08:10 PM
13

People here never go outside lol. You may want a more representative sample of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 06:46 PM
10

If a guy falls in love and can’t get over her, what to you propose he does?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 06:39 PM
1

You are the men women are trying to avoid by employing this strategy lol; horndogs who just want a gf as a reliable fuckbuddy and don’t lay anything in the relationship beyond that.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 06:31 PM
4

What makes one a romantic partner according to you? Booby booby touchy touchy?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 06:23 PM
6

Whataboutism lol. Both of those are red flags.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 06:13 PM
20

Staying in a friendship that hurts you emotionally is also very healthy. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 05:33 PM
1

What’s the point in making up a whole new scary-sounding word if it’s merely used as a vague catch-all term for the ways in which female sexuality allegedly differs from male sexuality? Can’t people just say “female sexuality”? The argument also kind of disappears if the word doesn’t have a strict definition. “Comparison is a bigger threat to women’s desire because of hypergamy”. “Comparison is a bigger threat to women’s desire because of… female sexuality”.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/22 12:17 PM
1

I was referring to the context of my comments, a guy claiming that men consciously compare and rate their current partners relative to their exes.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 10:20 PM
1

Nice me too. Do you believe you would end up thinking of your potential future partner as merely numbers out of 10? Is that love according to you people?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 08:30 PM
1

Probably not, but I’m not the hypocrite here. You lose the right to whine about wifey not desiring you when you simultaneously think of her as lesser than your ex gfs. You reap what you sow. 🤣
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 08:20 PM
18

“Loyalty” from a person who’s only with you for sex is not exactly worth much lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 05:25 PM
3

⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⡿⠟⢛⠩⠫⢪⢥⢳⣱⣣⢿⣽⣽⡻⣻⢿⡿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣿⣿⣿⠟⠩⢠⢰⢴⢮⣻⢽⢽⣺⣳⢯⢞⣽⡺⡮⡯⣞⡽⣽⢯⣟⡿⣿⣿⣿⣿ ⣿⣟⠟⢀⢬⢮⣺⣕⢯⡻⡮⣯⣻⣺⣺⢽⢽⢮⢯⢯⣻⡪⣟⡽⣯⢮⠫⣗⡿⣿⣻ ⡿⡏⢨⣺⢮⣫⡳⣕⢯⣞⢽⣺⡺⡺⡮⡯⡯⡯⣯⡻⡮⣟⣞⣞⣵⡳⡑⠍⣯⢷⣻ ⣿⠁⣗⢗⣕⢧⡣⣗⣗⢷⣝⣞⡮⡯⡯⡯⡯⣯⣺⢽⣝⣗⣗⣗⢯⣮⡢⡈⣺⢝⣞ ⡇⠂⡪⣣⢳⣳⢽⣺⣺⣳⣳⡳⣯⡻⣝⣗⢯⢗⣗⢯⣞⡾⣽⢮⡳⡱⣑⢔⢸⡳⣳ ⡇⢐⠕⡕⣝⢮⣻⡪⣞⣞⢮⣞⢮⢯⣳⡳⣯⡻⡮⣗⣗⡯⣿⣻⣜⠂⡕⠜⡸⣝⢮ ⡧⠐⡡⢅⢇⢗⢵⢽⢕⢯⣳⡳⡽⣕⣗⢯⣳⢽⣝⢞⢮⢯⣻⣺⢳⡕⡕⡕⣜⣜⢮ ⡯⠂⠌⢜⢺⣪⡳⡽⣝⢷⣕⡯⡾⡵⣳⣻⣺⣳⡳⡽⣝⢵⢯⢾⣳⢕⢧⣯⢏⢋⠹ ⡆⠈⠌⠶⣰⣨⡪⡹⢝⡧⡳⣝⢮⠏⠇⢝⣜⢕⡫⡫⢮⡫⡯⣻⢮⣏⠷⡹⢾⢽⣜ ⣷⡈⠄⡁⠂🔴⠌⠀⢛⣬⣀⡁⢀⢁🔴⣉⠊⠊⡸⡜⣝⢮⣳⡳⣵⢴⡄⣹⡞ ⢕⢧⠁⠄⡁⠌⢄⠂⡁⡰⣯⣗⢿⣒⢒⢛⡪⣕⣟⣽⣪⢯⢞⢼⢸⢮⡻⡽⣵⣳⢝ ⠡⠣⡈⠦⣐⢨⠡⠁⠄⡪⣞⢾⢽⢽⣖⡥⣹⢺⡺⡺⣞⢯⢫⢪⡫⣗⡽⣽⡵⡯⣫ ⢘⠨⡀⠅⡃⠝⠌⠌⢸⡸⣽⣝⢭⣏⡳⣟⣮⡺⣪⢇⢪⢺⣂⢧⣻⣳⡍⠓⢫⡫⣞ ⢐⠅⡂⡂⢐⠡⠡⠁⡐⢕⢟⡞⠗⠳⣱⡈⠺⣝⡮⣗⢽⡪⣮⢳⣳⣻⣎⡮⡪⣺⢕ ⠐⢌⢐⢐⠠⠈⢄⡦⢀⠠⣈⡰⣐⣜⡾⡽⣆⡑⢽⢮⣳⢽…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 03:14 PM
1

Obviously love doesn’t conquer all, but that doesn’t mean it isn’t an essential part of a romantic relationship. A relationship based only on love is nothing. But a relationship without love is also nothing. And a person who thinks like the above about their partner, man or woman, clearly does not love their partner. You still haven’t explained what you mean by “hypergamy” in this context.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 03:11 PM
0

If the cheating is accepted, the thing that makes cheating bad is kinda gone, isn’t it?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 02:56 PM
1

I was just wondering whether an article existed that looked at promiscuity across cultures and came to the same conclusion you did. I know you can’t know about literally all cultures that have ever existed. I don’t know shit about other cultures, so I don’t have an example lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 02:42 PM
1

Maybe you are correct, but I haven’t seen evidence of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 02:27 PM
1

I mean that comparison is inherently more dangerous to a woman's ability to have sufficient true desire for her husband to keep the relationship going. How so? You really don’t think the act of rating your wife’s body relative to your exes in your head miiiight be an indication of some lack of love? Would you really think of the love of your life as “7/10 boobs, 5/10 ass, Melanie was better”? 😐
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 02:12 PM
1

You made the affirmative statement.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 02:00 PM
0

Top comment is right, this is 100% projection from RP men who don’t feel romantic love. Yikes. Anyway, what do you mean when you say women are “hypergamous”? That they are so fully and completely monogamous that it’s not possible for them to feel attraction to more than 1 man throughout their entire life?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 01:54 PM
3

Isn’t it only banned when referring to the lgbt community specifically?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 01:45 PM
1

Non promiscuous women are preferred over promiscuous women everywhere. Do we have sauce on that?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 01:43 PM
0

Do you believe this is how men think about their partners? Do they compare their wives boobies and bj skills to exes?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 01:31 PM
2

Wholesome
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 12:43 PM
1

The only way this would be possible is if men want long term relationships more than women. Do you have evidence of that being the case?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 12:42 PM
2

You are married, right? If you had to choose between keeping your wife and having casual sex with young women, would you choose the latter?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 12:28 PM
1

If you were able to, would you abandon your current marriage for casual sex with young, hot women?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 12:18 PM
1

If you were able to, would you abandon your current marriage for casual sex with young, hot women?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 12:18 PM
1

Where does that anecdotal experience come from?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 09:34 AM
1

Do you believe women are the only ones who only love people who “add to their life”? You guys like EvPsych, right? What’s the evolutionary advantage in feeling “idealistic” love for people who don’t help you further your goals in life?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/22 09:14 AM
2

How do men love and how do women love according to you?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 07:37 PM
2

You don’t think it’s at all possible for women to separate love and sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 06:43 PM
2

But women inherently do? Also, if it is easier for someone to get attached, doesn’t that imply they value LTR’s more?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 06:33 PM
2

What does that mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 06:30 PM
2

Does your interest in casual sex mean that you do not value LTR’s?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 06:15 PM
2

If some madman is out there investing a triple digit number of hours in a pretend game to lay random chicks he doesn’t care about, he deserves it at that point, lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 04:32 PM
2

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 11:41 AM
0

It’s not like men are any different lmao. No one “loves people for who they are”, not even your parents. If you want to be very cynical about it, they love you because of your ability to spread their genes.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/22 11:11 AM
1

Gugu gaga
/r/AntiFeminists13/07/22 02:19 PM
1

Feminism bad because China? That’s a new one lol. Since feminism is directly against the nuclear family Feminism is not inherently against the nuclear family, although we should be, because the nuclear family is garbage, and is also not the “good old tradition” it is made out to be. Let’s return to the real tradition, communal living; the lifestyle humans evolved to thrive in.
/r/AntiFeminists09/07/22 05:15 PM
1

Or, what if, and hear me out, we combine the financial freedom of the 50’s (and maybe even go further than that), with the social freedom of feminism, so that all people, regardless of gender, have the opportunity to choose what they want to work with, whether that be engineering or child-rearing?
/r/AntiFeminists09/07/22 09:14 AM
3

Why do the people who claim to hate Marxism always spew the most based takes? most women currently employed admit they would prefer to give up the job if it were not for needing the money? Exactly. Imagine if society collectively provided for stay at home parents so that it would be possible for these women to become SAHM’s like they want without suffering financially? Do you also think that those men who are dependant upon their employer are like a child and not in their right mind? The other p…
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 09:21 PM
0

idk why a lot of feminists have a problem with them as a whole. They don’t.
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 09:51 AM
2

This is so ridiculous, lmao. The number one Marx-fem critique of the capitalist nuclear family is that the work done by SAHM’s is not being properly financially compensated for, and that the capitalist system deems work in the home to be unproductive. Know what you are criticising lol.
/r/AntiFeminists08/07/22 09:50 AM
1

Look at what the majority of people are doing in the name of what they identify as and there you have your definition. Most democracies actually practice for their citizens free and fair elections. The select few claim they are but aren't like North Lorea are dictatorships This is just wrong. IIRC, about half of countries in the world are democratic, whereas basically everyone “identify” as democratic. A few decades ago, it would be a tiny minority of self identified democracies that would be co…
/r/AntiFeminists06/07/22 08:34 PM
0

Guess I’ll be a man then.
/r/AntiFeminists05/07/22 08:34 PM
1

I look at what people who define themselves as a certain group do instead of what they say. If we defined words that way, pretty much all terms related to politics would be completely and utterly meaningless. Pretty much all states in the world “define themselves” as democratic, while a minority is actually considered democratic. The exact same goes for “communist”, “liberal”, “socialist”, “libertarian” etc. It would make political discourse impossible, as we need terms to convey ideas. You coul…
/r/AntiFeminists05/07/22 08:32 PM
6

But the dynamics clearly favours the 'alpha'. How? Because the poor beta is forced to interact with w*men in non-sexual contexts?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/07/22 04:55 PM
-3

Democracy can be defined as “rule of the people”. The vast, vast majority of people who believe in democracy agree on this definition. Feminism can be defined as “the advocacy for gender equality”. The vast, vast majority of people who believe in feminism agree on this definition. Where disagreements arise is in when you try to define these terms more clearly. When exactly is a country “ruled by the people”? Is a representative democracy a democracy? Exactly how much corruption and election frau…
/r/AntiFeminists05/07/22 04:34 PM
-3

How?
/r/AntiFeminists05/07/22 01:59 PM
-5

“Oh, you believe in democracy? What do you think about the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea? Democracy doesn’t seem to work very well over there, huh? Oh, you don’t think North Korea is a “true” democracy? No true Scotsman alert!”
/r/AntiFeminists05/07/22 11:32 AM
-1

As a feminist lady, I’m here for the same reason I like visiting zoos. 🍿
/r/AntiFeminists05/07/22 11:17 AM
7

It’s hypocrisy if you simultaneously believe women can’t have preferences.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 01:40 PM
9

“The one goal in most women’s lives is to marry an old rich man”. “Most women don’t want to marry a homeless man”. Moving the goalpost a bit, eh?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 12:15 PM
1

And well capitalizing on human suffering for profit en masse is kind of fucked up anyway. Preach, comrade!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 12:10 PM
3

Yes, we are talking past each other, but not in the way you are thinking. Very few women literally believe height/looks/size/income doesn’t matter at all, and is never an advantage. What they are usually saying when making these arguments is that height/looks/etc. is less important than someone else deem them to be, “someone else” typically being some incel guy who’s sad about how his lack of height means he will never be desired or achieve happiness. In this context, “lots of short people find …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 10:57 AM
0

Companies realise they can exploit biological instincts to earn money? Must be the anti male conspiracy!
/r/PurplePillDebate01/07/22 05:33 AM
3

Ah yes, dangerous jobs, Engineer, computer scientist and CEO.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 10:08 PM
7

TLDR: the wage gap doesn’t exist because we don’t think the things that cause said wage gap count. Check this out if you have one and a half hour to spend.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/06/22 05:46 PM
-2

You could say the exact same thing about literally any controversial topic lol. “People don’t want to listen to my revolutionary ideas about age of consent laws? These snowflakes just can’t tolerate difference in opinion smh. 😤”
/r/AntiFeminists29/06/22 04:07 PM
4

Ah yes, the classic! "Basically no one washes their hands after pooping, I am just the only one here who's honest about it! Right?"
/r/PurplePillDebate26/06/22 09:51 AM
1

Who's to say those women are in fact satisfied with that? Logic. If Stacy wanted more sex, she could just get it. If Stacy wanted just as much sex as Chad, Chad wouldn’t need to go dumpster diving for 3/10 women; Stacy and Chad would just fuck each other and no one else. And this would mean that our premise, that 20% of men fuck 80% of women, would be false. Keep in mind, “satisfied” in this context doesn’t mean “happy”. It means “not craving more casual sex”. And in the regular marketplace, you…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 08:34 PM
1

It’s so incredibly straightforward lol. You have 5 women and 5 men. There’s 1 Chad among them. He fucks 4 of the women. This means that very time he has sex with those 4 women, the 4 women only have sex with 1 man. And they are seemingly satisfied with that; otherwise they would begin to fuck the other 4 men. So, what we are seeing here is that top 20% of men want to have sex 4x as often as those 80% of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 06:23 AM
3

Well, that’s settling too.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/06/22 06:04 AM
-1

Nah, do whatever the fuck you want in the comfort of your bedroom. It’s called freedom, baby, the whole point of feminism. There’s simply no contradiction in wanting more rights and being a freaky degenerate.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/22 08:15 PM
1

As we all know, the first principle of the feminist movement is to not enjoy kinky sex.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/22 07:48 PM
23

I actually think men are settling a lot more than women. When was the last time you encountered a woman saying she would accept literally any man who shows any interest in being her boyfriend? This mindset is very common in men, at least on the internet. I think a lot of guys view romantic relationships as their only possible outlet for emotional support, which makes it very difficult for them to live without one. Women simply need relationships less, and they therefore have fewer reasons to set…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 07:24 PM
2

That proves my point… if 80% of women are satisfied with the sex they can get from 20% of men, it implies that the average man wants sex 4x as often as the average woman.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 10:28 AM
2

I just wanna have casual enthusiastic sex. I want to be desired and lusted after. But you also want to be the guy that has to lie to be desirable. 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 06:07 AM
0

women have as much or more of a sex drive than men. they usually don't have to fight the world for it. It is logically impossible for both of these to be true when the population is roughly 50/50 men and women and most people are heterosexual. Every time a woman has sex, a man has sex too, correct? If women wanted just as much sex as men, they would have equal access to the sex they wanted and men wouldn’t have to work so much more to get it. (This is not to say that no women like having tons of…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/06/22 05:49 AM
-2

The whole reason why women have easier access to casual sex is because they want it less. And why do they want it less? Because they like it less. Take that into account when imagining what it would be like to date as a woman. It is not a privilege to have access to something you do not want at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/06/22 08:59 PM
0

The difference lies in the fact that OOP’s joke was funny
/r/AntiFeminists17/06/22 06:55 AM
7

Fair enough. We can work around the human rights thing, but that doesn’t mean it’s ethical. What you are proposing is to financially coerce women into what’s essentially prostitution. Is the increased happiness men get from having personal sex slaves who don’t love them worth that? And the free visa thing is just plainly ridiculous lol. I’m sure “We don’t want any more of you people in this country, sexy women are worth so much more as citizens! 😘” is a GREAT message to send to men who reportedl…
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/22 06:21 PM
5

The difference is that we can theoretically fix the problems caused by capitalism, while it almost certainly would be a violation of human rights to do anything about the sexual marketplace.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/22 02:26 PM
0

You could also be demisexual!
/r/PurplePillDebate15/06/22 02:12 PM
5

Exploiting stupid people for personal gain is not a “female instinct”.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 11:46 AM
5

Character arc.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/06/22 11:21 AM
2

Nobody understands what hypergamy means in pill context. It has become a scary catch-all term for anything and everything deemed wrong with wahmens sexuality.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 07:35 PM
1

Well I mean, technically it is..... How?
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/22 07:05 PM
2

The population is 50/50 men and women, and most people are monogamous, so unless you want to argue that men want relationships more than women, or unless you are such a terrible and hideous person that you would be a net negative in literally anybody’s life, we can assume that it would be possible to find someone, no?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 05:51 PM
8

"Women want to date attractive men" is not exactly a revolutionary concept...
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 04:07 PM
-2

Lmfao, how on earth is this feminism? She explicitly states that she wants a relationship with traditional gender roles. Let me guess, feminism = women? Retards.
/r/AntiFeminists11/06/22 12:46 PM
0

Oh right, so it's just par for the course to advertise your almost naked body to other men while you're in an exclusive relationship. It’s generally assumed that it’s not wrong when it’s the other way around; men looking at pictures of sexy women. Then it’s impersonal and doesn’t mean anything and yada yada. So why is it suddenly wrong to be the other person in that impersonal and meaningless interaction? If anything, it’s probably more meaningful to the men. It does imply that and even if you t…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 09:29 AM
-2

Because it's essentially advertising to other men "hey boys, look at my body, my nice big booty, Yeah. Is there anything inherently wrong with that? come and get a piece of this if you meet my high standards!!!". It doesn’t imply that at all. Posting pictures is not the same as making a Tinder profile.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 08:24 AM
5

17 years. 💪😎
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 08:07 AM
0

Why do you think it isn’t fine?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/06/22 07:48 AM
3

Where tf is the misandry?
/r/AntiFeminists10/06/22 08:11 PM
2

Thank you!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 07:32 PM
7

Women denying RP truths reinforce RP truths. Beautiful kafka trap.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 06:10 PM
27

> if you want a hole just call a hooker, If what you want is shallow casual sex, how is this argument invalid? Unless what you want is the validation that comes from being wanted, in which case, say that instead and we may sympathise more.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 05:55 PM
1

The reason I ask is because this sub leads me to believe women always date up and only date men who are better than themselves. 10/10 supermodel Stacy was the femcel all along?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/06/22 04:52 PM
1

The only thing you can figure out from preferences on dating sites is what they are. Not how strong they are. If a person gets bombarded with 800 dick offers, every little preference they have is going to be a deal breaker, because they can afford to be picky. That doesn’t necessarily mean that every one of their preferences are “important”.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 07:02 PM
3

“Hey, this medication has these side effects, which kinda sucks.” How could anyone be offended by that? Lol.
/r/AntiFeminists07/06/22 06:33 PM
0

Only on here do clowns seemingly purport the idea that good looks, height and myriad other seemingly "shallow" desires somehow aren't important. I’ll eat my hat if anyone you have interacted with on here has ever said that. The only thing being debated is how important it is. And you simply can’t figure that out by looking at a subset of a subset of women the way you do. If I went to some sugar dating site, it's safe to say the majority of the women on there will be looking for wealthy men. If I…
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 10:30 AM
1

Maybe if some women never slept with friends, some men wouldn’t be so inclined to attempt that approach. I don’t care why they do it. It’s still immoral and “unreasonable”. You choose your partners because you think they are better. I’m not attracted to my female friends. That doesn’t mean I see them as lesser.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 08:25 AM
1

That’s stupid. You can’t just wave away selection bias by saying all humans are similar lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 08:09 AM
5

No, of course not. The people women are complaining about are the dipshits who deliberately fake their friendships with women in the hopes of getting sex. this person has a significant other, who is objectively deemed to be better than you. No…? From where do people get the idea that friends are inherently worse than romantic partners?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/06/22 07:43 AM
1

Men are more willing to have casual sex than women are. They aren’t more willing to enter long term relationships than women are. While women’s pool of sexual choices may be bigger, the chance of picking a person out of that pool who’s willing to commit to a long term relationship is drastically lower for women. Overall, men and women have roughly the same amount of romantic options (the population is 50/50 men and women, and most people are monogamous), women just have to sort through more tras…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/06/22 06:53 PM
3

Probably didn't check your post history before now.
/r/AntiFeminists02/06/22 05:44 PM
-1

?
/r/AntiFeminists02/06/22 05:14 PM
-5

Thank god for the Daily Mail! How would we have known about reality if they hadn't reported on strong-minded 27-year-old Alice??
/r/AntiFeminists02/06/22 05:03 PM
3

This is most likely an automatic ban for being a user of subreddits that are frequently brigading. It doesn't have anything to do with what you commented.
/r/AntiFeminists02/06/22 04:21 PM
-4

Leave it to antifeminists to use a random daily mail article as evidence. 😂
/r/AntiFeminists02/06/22 04:17 PM
1

then I'd ask "wtf?". If I birth a child or get cancer or some shit. "You don't fulfill my needs anymore. Adios, my dear." That's pretty much every guy in existence. I simply don't believe that. I'm sure there are lots of decent men out there. Though if I can't find one, so be it, I'd be better off single. No matter what, being nothing but a vessel for some horny guy's "biological urge to spread his seed" is not something I'm the slightest bit interested in. Your evolutionary drive is to find a p…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/06/22 08:42 AM
1

I was trying to be philosophical here. You ruined it. :( Striving for a specific thing you happen to not be able to get is different than striving for something specifically because you can't get it.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/22 07:11 PM
1

Well, my arguments still work with your definition. I wouldn't trust a person who will get health problems without sex, for the exact same reasons. The chances of them cheating and/or settling are way too high. Also, I don't think I would ever be comfortable with a person who has such a radically different view of sex than I have. Like, I believe sex is supposed to be a fun, intimate and bonding experience with the person you love that happens when the time is right. Reducing it to just a bodily…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/22 06:42 PM
1

The okcupid study also said that women would still message men they deemed unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/22 06:11 PM
6

Sounds good tbh. I don't believe most men would actually be satisfied with that life, but it would be quite amazing if the few men who think romantic relationships can be replaced by sex bots would dissappear from the dating market forever.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/22 03:47 PM
5

> This is called open hypergamy. This is called "being attracted to looks".
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/22 03:32 PM
0

The 80% figure is misleading, it's actually 80% of guys who are below average attractiveness. Are you refering to the okcupid study or are you retarded?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/06/22 03:15 PM
1

You don’t usually say “she’s not my dream girl and she has an ok face” about someone you are in love with.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 03:37 PM
1

so being with someone who isn’t your dream person but you still find attractive isn’t a common thing now….? By “not you dream person”, do you mean you are not in love with them? Because that’s called settling, and red pillers throw a tantrum every time they as much as suspect a woman is doing that. & please tell me how a woman simply not being fat and not having a busted face top 30…. Your first criteria costs you around 50% of the population, depending on where you live of course (if you live i…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 02:55 PM
2

Imagine being in relationships with a person who thought of your face as “ok” lmfao. Also, it sounds like you are aiming for the top 30%.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 02:33 PM
9

It’s a very arbitrary line to draw, though. Plenty of 18 year olds are basically kids.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 02:20 PM
1

No? I have no idea what you are implying.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 12:57 PM
2

So, prostitutes? Lmfao. What an enviable lifestyle.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 09:44 AM
1

You say that you are only really seeking casual sex for validation, right? If women suddenly began having sex with men that previously didn't fit their standards, casual sex would no longer be exclusive. And it would no longer provide validation.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/05/22 09:44 AM
7

Spot on.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 08:24 PM
3

It’s difficult to be happy with this mindset, isn’t it? Like, you will always be striving for the things you can’t get, because those things are exclusive by definition, and therefore validating. If you could get hookups easily, you would strive for being a super model. If that was easy, you would want to be a professional athlete...
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 08:21 PM
1

If you view sex as a chore and not a burning passionate desire, I never said it isn’t a desire. But it is not a need. Think about it this way: A need is, per definition, an uncompromisable requirement no matter what. This kind of person is not going to live without sex. So tell me, what will happen when their partner gets sick and can’t fuck them every day anymore? To put this in your own format: "Maybe he doesn't want to be in a relationship with someone who views a relationship as a need." See…
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 08:10 PM
1

Thanks!
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 06:48 PM
1

You really don’t need to be dating at 18. I’m in the age group that is “supposed” to be dating these 18 year olds, and no thank you. We have our entire lives ahead of us. Why rush things?
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 06:30 PM
3

I’m a 17 year old who deny it. Do I also see the wall ahead? I deny it for a very good reason, too. All it takes is a fucking 10 second google search to conclude that you are wrong: Average age gap in the US is 2,3 years.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 06:20 PM
24

Mainly because the average female sex drive is very different from your male one. I personally find the idea of having casual sex absolutely repulsive, and it would seem like at least a decent percentage of other women do too. Besides that, women also face unique consequences from casual sex; pregnancy, higher STD risks, rape and murder are among the more serious ones. Then there's the slutshaming, the risk of having bad orgasmless sex because a lot of men are selfish cunts in bed, and just havi…
/r/seduction30/05/22 02:24 PM
3

Me. I always win.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 01:38 PM
-4

That number includes 18 year old babies. I think they will survive.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 01:36 PM
1

I don't think anyone denies that women generally prefer men a couple years older. But it's young male loser cope to think that normal 20 year olds are dating 45 year olds.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 01:33 PM
0

It’s transphobic to call a trans woman a man. That has nothing to do with whether you want to date them or not.
/r/AntiFeminists30/05/22 12:00 PM
-1

Aren’t the people you go on dates with classified as people you know in these statistics? That would make the most sense, imo.
/r/AntiFeminists30/05/22 11:57 AM
3

Are hydrophobic things afraid of water?
/r/AntiFeminists30/05/22 11:55 AM
1

feminists believe in entities that can't be objectively measured or proven to exist […] the patriarchy What is it exactly that cannot be objectively measured?
/r/AntiFeminists30/05/22 08:41 AM
1

No
/r/PurplePillDebate30/05/22 06:37 AM
8

Ben Shapiro
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/22 08:45 PM
1

I would choose A even if I was equally attracted to them. You can be almost 100% certain that A isn’t settling. Not so much with B. And who wants to be on a pedestal?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/05/22 07:35 AM
1

If you are polite about it and have a reason to bring it up, no you won’t. If you say out of nowhere “Sorry, I don’t find fat people hot”, for example under a random picture of an overweight person who never asked for your opinion, you should be figuratively burned at the stake for being a narcissistic asshole. Depending on the platform, the above behavior might not even get you criticism. Find any Reddit post involving an overweight person, and you will be able to find dozens of heavily upvoted…
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/22 06:40 AM
0

Then there’s nothing wrong with you preferring thin women.
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/22 06:07 AM
-1

No. She chastised being rude to overweight people, she chastised unsolicitedly telling overweight people how unattractive you find them, and she chastised making the assumption that slim women are always more healthy than overweight women. Do you think sexually preferring slimmer people inherently implies the behavior mentioned?
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/22 06:01 AM
0

Your sexual preferences are not the objective standard for who people are allowed to call beautiful, lmao.
/r/AntiFeminists29/05/22 05:50 AM
-7

I would personally be very extremely willing to make that sacrifice. That kinda man has negative value as a boyfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 07:47 PM
-1

She literally said it was ok to have preferences, though.
/r/AntiFeminists28/05/22 07:42 PM
-8

Maybe she doesn’t want a boyfriend who sees sex as a need?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/05/22 07:12 PM
-1

If that was true then explain why I consider myself an anti feminist and an egalitarian? Because you refuse to learn what words mean lmao.
/r/AntiFeminists28/05/22 01:41 PM
0

We aren’t ignoring anything. People decide what words mean. If we decide that the words “man” and “woman” don’t strictly refer to the biological sexes, but to social genders, we can simultaneously acknowledge that only people with female reproductive systems can give birth, and also that some people with female reproductive systems are men (trans men). E: I guess someone ran out of arguments lol
/r/AntiFeminists28/05/22 01:03 PM
0

No, not really. It’s not like hordes of people are going to identify as the other gender just because they can, this option would only really be useful for the small percentage of the population that is transgender. Of course we run into a few minor issues, but they are easily fixable for the most part.
/r/AntiFeminists28/05/22 06:37 AM
0

Yes?
/r/AntiFeminists28/05/22 06:14 AM
1

If given the option of a person being boring but having the traits I describe or you not finding a partner what is preferable to you? I strongly doubt I would be able to fall in love with someone I found boring. And if I’m not in love, I’m obviously staying single. I would probably give it a try if I somehow ended up catching feelings, but the relationship would be much, much more difficult for me to maintain than a romantic relationship without physical intimacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/22 01:48 PM
0

An adult person who wants to be called she.
/r/AntiFeminists27/05/22 01:18 PM
1

What about after that half hour? Would you be satisfied in a relationship where you never had any interesting conversations whatsoever?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/22 09:45 AM
5

I, and a loooot of other people, pair bond through shared interests. Having fun, deep, and engaging conversations about nerdy topics we are both obsessing over is a way of connecting with people. I would almost go so far as saying it’s my main love language. A person being boring means they can’t reciprocate that energy I find necessary in relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/22 08:38 AM
5

“Hey. I’m home.” “Hey…” “…” “…” “…” “Have you read the news about the Prime Minister?” “No” “…” “Alright…” “…” “…” “…” “…” “Did anything interesting happen at work?” “No. It was a very normal day.” “Ok” “…” “…” “Terrible weather we are having.” “Yes. It is very rainy.” “…” “…” “…” Dream relationship! So sexy!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/22 08:01 AM
1

“Oh, so you say you don’t really care for lasagna, and don’t want to center your life around eating lasagna? Then how come you would still rather eat a well-made lasagna than a lasagna made with poop?”
/r/PurplePillDebate27/05/22 07:16 AM
0

The word “she”, for example. I’ve literally answered that question 2 times in this thread already lol.
/r/AntiFeminists27/05/22 07:02 AM
2

You don’t need an official diagnosis or anything, it’s just about googling around until you are familiar enough with the term to determine if it describes you. You can always start here: https://lgbtqia.fandom.com/wiki/Aromantic
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 08:45 PM
2

Hey dude, you may want to look into the possibility of you being aromantic.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 07:52 PM
2

Lmao, how on earth does women not wanting to fuck ugly people inherently imply that sex is important to them?? Doesn’t it literally imply the opposite??
/r/PurplePillDebate26/05/22 07:45 PM
1

People decide what words mean. Since it brings trans people happiness to be able to choose what they want to be called, and since it doesn’t hurt cis people at all, I see no reason why we shouldn’t let “man” and “woman” include trans men and trans women. Biology doesn’t care, this is a question of linguistics.
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 06:37 PM
0

An adult person who identifies with the social signifiers associated with the female sex.
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 05:01 PM
0

It makes a huge difference for people with gender dysphoria.
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 03:05 PM
0

That’s not the definition I posted in my phone original comment lol.
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 03:03 PM
1

Because it makes exactly zero difference for cis people whether the definition of “man” and “woman” includes trans people.
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 03:02 PM
1

I wrote a different definition in my original comment.
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 03:00 PM
0

The word “she”, for example.
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 02:59 PM
0

The word “she”, for example.
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 02:58 PM
0

How is it a circular definition?
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 08:49 AM
-4

Who gives a fuck about chromosomes lol. I just want trans people to live happier lives, which we do by minimally changing the definitions of "man" and "woman" to include them.
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 08:11 AM
-3

You could say it like that too if "female" in this instance include trans women.
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 08:01 AM
-5

You got banned because this is so obviously a bad faith question. Not because we can't define "woman". A woman is an (adult) person who identifies with the social signifers associated with the female sex. There you go. Easy.
/r/AntiFeminists26/05/22 07:49 AM
-1

Women are more vulnerable to STDs than men. The top commenter made the claim that men face the same risks as women. An additional risk that hurts both men and women doesn’t negate the unique consequences women face; the ones the OOP was talking about specifically.
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/22 02:11 PM
-2

Eyy, new copy pasta just dropped.
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/22 02:05 PM
-1

Men invest just as much in making a baby as women? Is that really a take you are willing to commit to?
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/22 02:00 PM
-1

No?
/r/AntiFeminists25/05/22 01:55 PM
-1

No argument? ⠀⣞⢽⢪⢣⢣⢣⢫⡺⡵⣝⡮⣗⢷⢽⢽⢽⣮⡷⡽⣜⣜⢮⢺⣜⢷⢽⢝⡽⣝ ⠸⡸⠜⠕⠕⠁⢁⢇⢏⢽⢺⣪⡳⡝⣎⣏⢯⢞⡿⣟⣷⣳⢯⡷⣽⢽⢯⣳⣫⠇ ⠀⠀⢀⢀⢄⢬⢪⡪⡎⣆⡈⠚⠜⠕⠇⠗⠝⢕⢯⢫⣞⣯⣿⣻⡽⣏⢗⣗⠏⠀ ⠀⠪⡪⡪⣪⢪⢺⢸⢢⢓⢆⢤⢀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠈⢊⢞⡾⣿⡯⣏⢮⠷⠁⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠈⠊⠆⡃⠕⢕⢇⢇⢇⢇⢇⢏⢎⢎⢆⢄⠀⢑⣽⣿⢝⠲⠉⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⡿⠂⠠⠀⡇⢇⠕⢈⣀⠀⠁⠡⠣⡣⡫⣂⣿⠯⢪⠰⠂⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⡦⡙⡂⢀⢤⢣⠣⡈⣾⡃⠠⠄⠀⡄⢱⣌⣶⢏⢊⠂⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⢝⡲⣜⡮⡏⢎⢌⢂⠙⠢⠐⢀⢘⢵⣽⣿⡿⠁⠁⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠨⣺⡺⡕⡕⡱⡑⡆⡕⡅⡕⡜⡼⢽⡻⠏⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⣼⣳⣫⣾⣵⣗⡵⡱⡡⢣⢑⢕⢜⢕⡝⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⣴⣿⣾⣿⣿⣿⡿⡽⡑⢌⠪⡢⡣⣣⡟⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⡟⡾⣿⢿⢿⢵⣽⣾⣼⣘⢸⢸⣞⡟⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀ ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠁⠇⠡⠩⡫⢿⣝⡻⡮⣒⢽⠋⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
/r/AntiFeminists24/05/22 06:33 PM
1

Well, I agree? Is this meant to be a gotcha? Sorry, I can’t actually tell if you agree with me or not lmao.
/r/AntiFeminists24/05/22 06:30 PM
-15

If it was three women and one man, and anyone said anything in a similar vein, they'd call them misogynist. And it would be 100% justified, because overrepresentation of women in movies isn’t a problem, unlike with men, meaning that you would essentially be complaining about women being represented, not overrepresented. There’s nothing wrong with one movie having more women than men or more men than women. The problem is when 90% of movies have more men than women. If reality was the reverse, yo…
/r/AntiFeminists23/05/22 08:17 PM
1

Take a nap.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/22 08:27 AM
4

I don’t think it’s very weird that people would be less willing to have threesomes involving a person they love romantically. Regarding everything else, do we have any evidence besides anecdotes suggesting that people are more sexually adventurous with casual partners than with romantic partners? Because it seems counter intuitive.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/22 07:52 AM
4

Because “Me (34F) and my husband (36M) have an amazing relationship and love each other very much” doesn’t make for a very good story.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/22 07:43 AM
1

Lmao, do people actually say that?? That’s just blatantly calling you ugly, wtf? I really hope you aren’t friends with those women anymore.
/r/PurplePillDebate22/05/22 07:22 AM
1

And romantic feelings?
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 09:20 PM
1

I see comments basically saying "most women aren't worth waiting several months for, I would only do it if she was exceptionally great" all the time on this subreddit. How can you people say things like that and still act surprised when women use it as a test to see how much you are into them? Women want to be desired. They don't want to be the woman who was only worth it because she put out easily.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/05/22 09:07 PM
-13

Toxic femininity, like toxic masculinity, is the internalization of unhealthy gender roles. Feminism is literally the opposite of that. E: Top comment guy blocked me like a lil pussy. Can't reply.
/r/AntiFeminists21/05/22 03:48 PM
-10

Leave it to antifeminists to get triggered over a term they have absolutely zero idea of what means lmfao. E: Top comment guy blocked me. Can no longer reply to any of your retarded comments, unfortunately.
/r/AntiFeminists21/05/22 03:45 PM
0

just because they make you look bad. It’s not because they make me look bad, it’s because they aren’t feminists per definition. Words mean things. The point of the no true Scotsman isn’t that it’s fallacious to use definitions for words.
/r/AntiFeminists20/05/22 02:46 PM
1

Feminism doesn’t necessarily center women.
/r/AntiFeminists20/05/22 12:10 PM
0

Is it a no true Scotsman fallacy to say that dogs are mammals, and that it’s not a dog if it isn’t a mammal?
/r/AntiFeminists20/05/22 12:09 PM
-4

Per definition, that is what feminism is advocating. Idk and idc about what Random Feminist Organization, or Cringe Self-proclaimed Feminist Individual you call “feminism” is out there doing, it has nothing to do with me, a person who happens to believe in and advocate for gender equality and is therefore a feminist. Feminism is an ideology, not an organization. It’s the same deal with the socialism analogy. “That’s not what socialism is advocating for”. Yes, North Korea calls itself socialist f…
/r/AntiFeminists20/05/22 05:01 AM
-1

Gender egalitarianism is a synonym for feminism.
/r/AntiFeminists20/05/22 04:45 AM
-7

No person in the entire world believes in equality between the genders?
/r/AntiFeminists19/05/22 07:27 PM
-14

> Feminism doesn’t have a monopoly on equality. This is like saying that socialism doesn't have a monopoly on being in favor of worker ownership of the means of production. Like, yes they have, that's the definition of the ideology. Even if you strongly disagree with individal self-proclaimed socialists, or even the majority of socialists, that doesn't change that definition. People who are in favor of worker ownership of the means of production are socialists, and people who are in favor of gen…
/r/AntiFeminists19/05/22 07:04 PM
6

With casual sex, this is an inevitability if we accept the fact that men on average have a higher libido than women. It’s supply and demand. Women are still attracted to the average man, and they still enter monogamous relationships with them, but as long as they can get casual sex with Chad, they have no reason to have casual sex with uglier men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 05:38 AM
1

We can easily make welfare programs cover the child support instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/05/22 05:17 AM
11

It’s called financial abortion, and any reasonable person should be in favour of it. That said, the reason some people are against it is because it would lead to higher taxes.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/05/22 01:59 PM
4

I'd Roblox someone too if I was in that situation.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 06:21 PM
1

It was very obvious what you meant. You are running from an argument you are losing, and you know it.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 02:47 PM
1

Yes indeed. You are implying that you do not accept correlations as evidence of causality. But then why did you in your original comment try to use a correlation as evidence of causality?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 07:38 AM
1

Interesting. Does that mean you have evidence on top of the correlation that shows promiscuity to cause higher divorce rates?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/05/22 05:05 AM
1

every time a study shows that higher rates of x behaviour leads to higher rates of y outcomes. The entire point is that the studies don’t show this, lol. Based on those studies it would be just as reasonable to assume that both promiscuity and high divorce rates have a common third cause. For example, we know that being religious both makes you less likely to be promiscuous and to divorce. The existence of these religious nut jobs alone would be enough to have a correlation between promiscuity a…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 08:16 PM
3

I’d rather have 3 boobs than 2 boobs.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 07:47 PM
1

Yet it's not ok for men Dude, I never made any moral statements here. I merely pointed out the poor logic. There being a correlation between promiscuity and divorce doesn’t mean promiscuity causes divorce. It’s a well known fallacy.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/05/22 12:12 PM
7

Or she would rather stay single than be with those men.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 06:11 PM
0

Once again, correlation =/= causation. The women who have casual sex may be more likely to divorce, but there's no reason to believe having casual sex with a specific woman will increase her chances of divorcing her future husband.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 06:00 PM
0

Maybe some of them are incels because the women they have met wanted to be careful with picking the people they have sex with. 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 07:02 AM
0

No. But it will make the women who are already sexually attracted to you less likely to want to fuck you.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 06:23 AM
1

You are projecting a whole lot of weird shit onto me here lol. Ghosting is bad because Discomfort caused by being ghosted > discomfort caused by having to NOT ghost someone It’s very straightforward.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/05/22 06:22 AM
1

Lol, women ghosting is just as morally wrong.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/22 08:30 PM
1

But why are they entitled to that? Because your little amount of discomfort in the moment will be sparing her the much larger amount of discomfort caused by the uncertainty. It’s the objectively good thing to do. I don't want to deal with the awkwardness It’s 2 sentences sent over text. How is it awkward? I promise you, it’s much more awkward for the girl who doesn’t know why you aren’t answering her texts..
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/22 07:57 PM
1

“Sorry, but I don’t think we are compatible long term. I had a good time while it lasted, though. :)”
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/22 07:46 PM
0

Deliberately lying to and misleading people for sex makes you a POS. If you don’t want to invest in a woman who sleeps around, either don’t fuck her at all or make it clear that you are only interested in a ONS. Anything else is unethical.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/22 07:35 PM
2

Let’s say a young girl lurked on this subreddit and found comments like yours revealing that men think badly of a lot of the women they fuck. You don’t think that could discourage her from having sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/22 07:31 PM
3

Promiscuous women don't deserve relationships. The fact that you people think this makes fewer women want to have sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/22 07:25 PM
0

That makes you a POS. How is it relevant?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/22 07:14 PM
1

Men being sexless.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/22 07:10 PM
27

Friends can’t fill the void of not having a romantic relationship, but they can undeniably fill the void of loneliness. Per definition, loneliness is the lack of friends.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/22 07:09 PM
3

Likewise, people should take responsibility for the consequences of shaming women for having sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/22 07:00 PM
0

They asked for evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/22 06:47 PM
0

Who needs science when we have evidence like this.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/05/22 05:57 PM
1

That sub has always had a majority of red pillers lol. It's a debate subreddit. If you don't ever want to see feminist opinions or risk reevaluating your world view, it's probably not for you. E: The fact that you blocked me after replying tells me a lot about your willingness to engage in debate.
/r/AntiFeminists14/05/22 07:53 AM
4

Lmfao, you again. If you go to the local bakery and decide to not buy a chocolate cake because you don’t personally think the little happiness the cake brings you is worth the price you have to pay for it, does that mean you are delusional about the objective value of chocolate cake? Does it mean you feel entitled to cheaper chocolate cake? No. It means that you made the assessment that you would be better off without buying the chocolate cake. The baker has no right to get angry at the customer…
/r/PurplePillDebate12/05/22 07:08 AM
2

Interesting article I found: https://www.thedailybeast.com/why-men-are-settling-for-mrs-good-enough?ref=scroll Is it actually the men who are settling for Becky? 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 03:49 PM
0

I guess? I don’t know much about the FDS drama tbh. Didn’t the mods close the subreddit down by themselves?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 01:20 PM
4

The worst I’ve ever seen on that sub has been female separatist rants. And while that’s still terrible, the bigotry is not quite on the same level as the rape apologia in the manosphere.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/05/22 11:58 AM
1

Because the woman’s job was to make children and wash clothes and clean toilet. If she didn’t do those chores, the man would have to do them, meaning he would have less time for money-work.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 08:32 PM
1

It is for a lot of us. I, for example, would rather die than have casual sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 08:09 PM
2

But that’s not really a cost, though? Before, two people shared the same money, and now they each get 50% for themselves. How does that hurt one person more?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 07:26 PM
6

If they can’t even get a side chick, that might also be a reason why they stay. “Meh, it’s better than nothing I guess”.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/05/22 07:21 PM
17

1 vote per sex partner.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 05:49 PM
-2

I can tell What you can tell is that I’m female. Which we all know means I am biologically programmed to always and in all cases make decisions based on what inconveniences males the absolute most.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 02:15 PM
-1

Hdyk?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 01:31 PM
-1

No?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/05/22 06:31 AM
1

Well, it’s just as fine as calling it a clump of cells, which is also what it is. But unless the wording is actively a part of an argument, there’s no reason to call it anything but “abortion”.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 08:07 PM
8

I might attempt to befriend him to debate him for fun. But I absolutely would not date the guy unless he proved to somehow be the one red piller who is actually reasonable and not schizophrenic.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 07:59 PM
2

No, not inherently. But these kinds of parasocial relationships involving uncritical worship can become abusive when the guy is paid to stuff his followers with political nonsense.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 07:52 PM
3

Being a daddy for young boys.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 07:38 PM
3

Nah, people are just tired of the emotionally charged language, as it is obfuscating the conversation.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 07:32 PM
5

The parents are unnecessarily hurt if the wanted child is killed, they aren’t unnecessarily hurt by an abortion. That’s why it’s morally worse, at least. I don’t know much about the law surrounding it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 07:26 PM
2

They don’t have their whole brand based around it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 07:20 PM
1

He's always calm and collected, I would certainly be very calm and collected too if I got that amount of $$$ for it lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 07:18 PM
-4

Jeez, I just want a relationship where I’m not automatically expected to cook dinner and clean toilet all alone lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 07:14 PM
-1

MGTOW was great in theory. In reality, we ended up with rape apologism.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 06:55 PM
2

It could be pronounced like toe-w.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 06:51 PM
-4

Feminism is BY DEFINITION women going their own way. Lol, how? Feminists can’t be in romantic relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 06:49 PM
1

Look around where?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 02:36 PM
1

Do you think there are a lot of men out there who would “genuinely” have preferred a FWB arrangement with their romantic partner? Serous question.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 12:29 PM
1

But that doesn't mean she gets to dupe some average dude into thinking she loves him. That’s exactly what I’m saying, though? A woman isn’t going to marry some rando just because she can’t get Chad. The vast majority of people would prefer being single to being in a miserable relationship.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 12:26 PM
3

23% is not that much. It’s much less than the divorce rate, which means a majority of divorces happen despite the woman’s attraction. What were the numbers for men?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 07:56 AM
0

But if a man genuinely does prefer long term relationships, relationships wouldn’t be the worse treatment, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 07:53 AM
5

This is a debate subreddit, and you made an affirmative claim.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 07:46 AM
2

So women who marry men they don’t like still have to have sex with a person they are not attracted to.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 07:46 AM
3

Funny, but you are still dodging the question.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 07:44 AM
3

So you believe most married couples have never had sex with each other?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 07:43 AM
2

Nailed it.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 07:37 AM
2

Sauce?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 07:34 AM
4

I trust divorce stats Divorce stats tell you nothing related to the point. family pressure Don’t marry a tradcon. It’s your own fault if you do that. comfort with their rut Maybe. But you have to constantly keep up a lie and force yourself to spend time with and fuck someone you don’t like. Not exactly a comforting life. loud ticking of the biological clock You can easily get children today without marrying some guy. ready to hang the sexual boots up What? had an oops pregnancy and don’t want to…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 07:33 AM
8

If you believe quick pump and dump sex is better than long term romantic relationships, you should stuff your complaints up your a and simply never get married.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 07:19 AM
3

Oh so you only have a 1 in 2 chance of committing to someone incapable of genuinely desiring you. Wtf? Do you have any reason at all to believe that people who divorce never loved their partners??
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 07:12 AM
5

Women on the other hand aren’t attracted at all to the Betas they marry. Hence the dead bedroom. Hence the divorce rape. Hence the endless self-serving articles on not being in love with the “good guy on paper”. Do you have any evidence for this besides the cherry picked memories from your doom scrolling on r/deadbedrooms? Even the “dual mating strategy” that red pillers love to refer to has never argued that women aren’t attracted to their husbands. Like, why would you even get married today if…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 07:09 AM
7

But a lot of them would if they could.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/05/22 06:57 AM
4

May I jail u for rape?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 06:11 PM
4

I have always vocally supported financial abortions. Why should I be punished for happening to have the same genitals as some other idiot?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 06:05 PM
8

Wouldn’t it be better to make the system fair in the other direction that… y’know… makes life better for both genders instead of worse?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 05:03 PM
1

I agree with that.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 01:47 PM
6

It’s really fucking braindead how “emotional” has come to mean the opposite of “logical”. I get it in the specific context of arguing from emotion versus arguing from logic, but some people (misogynistic men lol) now seem to think that crying a lot and talking about your feelings means you are bad at math…??
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 12:32 PM
1

Become a marxfem, comrade.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/05/22 12:14 PM
1

I just knew who wrote this post as soon as I saw it lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 07:58 PM
2

Also if most women see casual sex with most males as poisonous that means they likely dont wanna date them either There is not a single person on this planet whom I would be willing to have casual sex with. But that doesn’t mean I don’t want a relationship…
/r/PurplePillDebate06/05/22 02:28 PM
1

That’s fair. Godspeed.
/r/AntiFeminists06/05/22 05:22 AM
-15

Considering the dictionary definition of a feminist is one that believes in gender equality, the opposite of that would be one that doesn’t believe in gender equality. “Misogynist” fits that description.
/r/AntiFeminists05/05/22 08:28 PM
2

Women see casual sex with most males as poisonous. It doesn’t satisfy them, oftentimes it makes them feel worse. Much like poisonous food.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 06:29 PM
1

Theoretically.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 04:07 PM
1

I’d love to see that Tinder experiment. Grandma vs grandpa, who can get most matches.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 03:36 PM
1

Women not wanting it is what makes it poisonous. The poisonous food is an analogy for casual sex with random men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 07:54 AM
3

They do that a lot less than men. Which is the whole exact reason why men can’t get casual sex. There are too few women who want it.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 05:05 AM
1

What even is “ego satisfaction”?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/05/22 04:59 AM
4

It’s not me who came up with the food analogy lol. Complain to the person I’m replying to.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 06:22 PM
3

What else would matter?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 06:21 PM
0

To you, it looks like women have more options, because women have more options for casual sex which a lot of them don’t want. You completely gloss over the fact that men and women have a roughly equal interest in long term relationships, meaning that women have just as many options as men for genuine romantic relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 06:02 PM
10

I can easily provide that myself. So what do I need a man for, if he doesn’t “satisfy my ego”, I.e. makes me feel happy and in love?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 05:55 PM
0

So one side has very little poisonous food while the other has a lot of poisonous food? Oh boy, I feel lucky to be the one with a lot of poisonous food.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 05:50 PM
2

Would you be willing to share some of your water with a sex-starved gay man?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 05:26 PM
-1

No, it's like telling a starving person that you have it just as bad because all your food is poisonous.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 05:17 PM
9

Where did you get the right to decide what women's needs are?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 05:10 PM
2

Thanks, that's actually kind of reassuring. It makes sense that some guys would want to play down their emotions as to not be seen as weak.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 04:57 PM
1

> And thus incentivize companies to hire only men in the process as they will be cheaper, Wait, how? By "female jobs" I mean jobs that are occupied mostly by women, not female workers individually. Where I live, these "female jobs" often pay much less, because it historically has been easier to get away with paying women less. And it was never really corrected. > if women were the more productive ones, then they are within their right to demand more pay! I do think most of the solution is for wo…
/r/AntiFeminists04/05/22 04:50 PM
18

It’s called “supply and demand”, and you have no choice but to deal with it. If attractive women don’t want you, they don’t want you.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/05/22 07:10 AM
4

In that case, isn’t it even worse to be with a straight guy not knowing if he would cheat if he had the option to?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 07:49 PM
2

Women do undeniably put more effort into their looks and therefore look better than men on average.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 07:17 PM
2

Again, even if it’s because women choose worse careers, that doesn’t mean the pay gap doesn’t exist, you just think it’s existence is justified. or a doctor to a nurse. It’s funny you bring it up, because this is a perfect example of “the patriarchy” artificially keeping women out of high paying jobs they would otherwise choose. The majority of new doctors and people studying to become doctors are women. Sure women may have the short end of the stick for having children. But that's is her choice…
/r/AntiFeminists03/05/22 07:15 PM
0

Do you deny the existence of gender roles or its influence in affecting career choices? Also, https://money.usnews.com/careers/best-jobs/plumber/salary
/r/AntiFeminists03/05/22 06:57 PM
1

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090626153511.htm
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 06:49 PM
10

How they experience attraction and love, in general. Especially how romantic and sexual attraction interact. Is it just the same thing to you? Like, when a guy on the internet introduces his girlfriend as a “7/10 chick with a nice ass”, is that an expression of his deep love for her? To me it sounds incredibly superficial and gives me the impression that the guy is only with her for easy sex and doesn’t actually feel anything deeper than that for her. Is that a correct assumption to make? Or is …
/r/PurplePillDebate03/05/22 06:32 PM
1

“Certain variables” lol. You are very good at being specific.
/r/AntiFeminists03/05/22 05:16 AM
1

But they still make less? And also, do black people also just happen to pick lower-paying jobs, or do you believe in the radical idea that circumstances may have some influence on how well people end up?
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/22 06:57 PM
1

Why is it flawed?
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/22 06:49 PM
0

The reason men earn more than women is not because there are more male fucking miners lmfao. The average construction worker earns basically nothing. If you want to ascribe the pay gap to the difference in the jobs men and women have, it’s because men are overrepresented in the typing-on-a-computer-and-going-to-meetings jobs that are relatively easy but requires some level of intelligence and education. I’m sorry if that doesn’t fit your romanticised idea of the honest, simple, selfless, hardwor…
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/22 06:46 PM
1

construction, mining, farming Ah yes, well known high paying jobs.
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/22 03:08 PM
0

That's just factually wrong lol.
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/22 12:36 PM
1

But why would you have to control for all that? Whether the reason behind it is that women work less because they raise children instead, or because they are worse at negotiations doesn't change the fact that women still make less in the end.
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/22 12:35 PM
1

> I'd love to actually see feminists answer this. The gay guys should be forced to pay for everything as a punishment for being oppressive moids. I am really not the kind of person to give a fuck about how other people choose to arrange their dates, but I personally think it would be most fair if they split the bill, or let the person who can best afford it pay, regardless of the sexuality and gender of the people involved.
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/22 07:41 AM
-1

Is it a myth that women on average earn less than men?
/r/AntiFeminists02/05/22 06:14 AM
7

Because people are wrong on the internet.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/22 02:58 PM
2

That’s fucked up.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/22 02:42 PM
1

When did I say men bad? I’m talking about you specifically. Even if you have infinite options, a month or two is not a very long time to find a decent wife replacement.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/22 02:40 PM
2

Because it sounds like you are only with her because you want a relationship, not because you like her. How unrealistic are you? You want a HVM who doesn't have options? I want a guy who likes me for me and doesn’t do a “meh, I’ll find another one in a month” if we break up.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/22 12:33 PM
1

I feel bad for your wife.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/22 11:17 AM
1

If there are 3 women and 7 men, the 3 women will each have to have sex with 2,3 men every time the men have sex with 1 woman each. And the thing is, there would be no reason for the sex to be evenly distributed among the men unless all men were satisfied with having 3/7 the amount of casual sex the women choose to have. And we all know men are at least as horny as women, so that’s not the case. If all the men want to have as much sex as the women, all the men will stay on Tinder until they have …
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/22 07:53 AM
1

True. Some men do look amazing. But it’s not the majority.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/05/22 07:25 AM
4

That would imply the women want more casual sex than the men...
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/22 06:40 PM
2

I don’t think it’s naturally like that, but as a straight woman I do think men tend to be less aesthetically pleasing than women. A blue t-shirt and a bath just doesn’t compare to the hours of work many women put into their looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/22 04:00 PM
8

Most people think there’s more to a romantic relationship than sex.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/22 03:21 PM
8

Okay, but why are they asexual? Because it’s a sexual orientation lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/04/22 02:45 PM
4

Options are options even if you don’t like them.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 08:37 PM
4

> Options are options even if you don't like them. Then go on Grindr.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 08:13 PM
1

Yeah true. I should have been more precise with my wording.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 05:08 PM
1

Socialism is not about making you the same as everyone else. You can still work hard and get compensated for the value you provide.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 01:20 PM
1

The exact same shithole we have now, basically.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 01:11 PM
8

Guys in the friendzone aren't "backup men" lmao. The whole point of the friendzone is that women see you as a friend. If the woman is intentionally being vague and ambiguous about her level of interest in you, it's not because she wants to keep you as a backup, it's because she likes the attention.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/04/22 09:55 AM
2

It’s used for “low value men”. If they believed all men were scrotes, they wouldn’t attempt to look for “high value men” and they wouldn’t be a dating subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/22 06:47 PM
-1

The term "scrote" is not used for all men, it was used in the same way "bitch" or "whore" are.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/04/22 12:23 PM
-1

??
/r/AntiFeminists28/04/22 04:55 AM
1

What are “male” complains?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/22 09:00 PM
3

Confidently explaining things to women is not harassment in the vast majority of cases. Usually it’s annoying at worst and slightly cute at best. Men having penises is a biological fact Some men have gotten it chopped off in accidents. (And also trans men, but I have a feeling you won’t agree with that one).
/r/AntiFeminists27/04/22 08:52 PM
1

Is it really a stereotype if it’s true for almost everyone? If so, the statement “men have penises” would be a stereotype too.
/r/AntiFeminists27/04/22 08:47 PM
19

I don’t really like getting head/don’t really have the most sensitive clit so I’m not getting off that way. Duuude, read the fucking post you are linking. When you cherry pick the posts that reinforce your doomer mindset, you’ll always find the specific women who are like this. Lots of women love getting head. Find those women and get them off with your mouth instead.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/04/22 08:42 PM
-2

Technically I said that literally all women experience it, which is close enough to being true to be considered true. But y’know what, I’ll own it. Pretty much all men do this.
/r/AntiFeminists27/04/22 08:30 PM
-14

There would be nothing wrong with that sentence if you excluded the “all”, like I did, and just said “women falsely accuse men of rape”. Because anyone with basic reading comprehension would interpret that sentence just fine as meaning “some women falsely accuse men of rape”.
/r/AntiFeminists27/04/22 08:18 PM
-15

Yeah lol. I’d say it’s something most men do to some degree. I don’t know if it’s done to impress women or because men feel like it’s their job to “lead”, but a lot of men do tend to very obviously overplay their own competence and give random pieces of advice as a way of showing off their skills. I don’t think it’s necessarily meant to be condescending, and I don’t think it’s always bad, but it can be annoying when you know you know more about a subject than they do, and they still insist on te…
/r/AntiFeminists27/04/22 08:13 PM
-25

Because that’s a thing men do all the time to literally all women, lol.
/r/AntiFeminists27/04/22 07:27 PM
1

A lot of it is also down to luck, so it’s difficult to say. You are probably not Chad, but it sounds like you are above the people that are referred to when we say “the bottom of the barrel”; the guys you find on incel forums and 4chan posting the most deranged essays you have ever seen about how literally all femoids including their mom refuse to be within a 20 kilometer radius of them.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/04/22 06:15 AM
5

Most men have relationships in their life. If you are 30 and have never had a girlfriend despite trying, you are not average.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/04/22 07:58 PM
–

Then get a big enough sample.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 12:14 PM
–

We can. It’s common knowledge around here that men lie up about their n-count. Since it’s mathematically impossible for straight men and women to have different average n-counts, women’s average will be less than men’s reported average.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/04/22 11:33 AM
1

I’m not sure what you mean?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 01:12 PM
2

What does that have to do with anything? Norah Vincent wasn’t trans.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 10:58 AM
2

“Gay and trans people exist” is an objective fact.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 08:49 AM
4

Women are more accepting of trans people than men are.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/04/22 07:47 AM
7

I somewhat agree with you. But the idea that there's absolutely no biological differences between men and women is pretty ridiculous. When biological males and biological females take hormones of the opposite sex, we do often see slight changes in their behaviour, for example, testosterone can increase sex drive. While there is a difference, I agree that it is way smaller than a lot of people think; the existence of racial stereotypes is proof that humans like to make up "inherent differences" w…
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 08:16 AM
1

Women prefer hot men. Why did we never think of that before???
/r/PurplePillDebate22/04/22 06:45 AM
3

I have now been awake for 20 hours, spending every damn minute trying to write my retarded school project with deadline in 14hours that I can't fucking get done. I want to die.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 10:13 PM
2

Thanks
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 09:59 PM
1

Let me do the opposite of humblebrag then. I'm happy that I'm seen as a weirdo by most guys, as it spares me from the bullshit my friends get from them.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/04/22 09:03 PM
0

> It's sad but there is no solution for men who have no access to relationships. Friends. > Women have access to more intimacy as single than in a relationship. What? Are you using "intimacy" as a symonym for sex or do you honestly believe casual sex with Chad is more intimate than romantic relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 02:44 PM
6

Wanting to be chosen for who you are is a major part of this. Nobody wants to be settled for. A man with options choosing to be with you is the best sign that he is actually into you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 02:38 PM
-1

Strawman. What people mean is that romantic relationships aren't the only way to be happy.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 02:35 PM
1

Absolute brain rot lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/04/22 12:55 PM
3

Idk, it’s not me doing this. I’ve heard other women on Reddit say they are up for paying for future dates after letting the man pay for the first.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/22 07:02 PM
3

Well, the weird tradition aside, isn’t that fair enough? It sounds like she decides based on whether she thinks she is able to pay you back someday or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/22 06:54 PM
7

Lmao, what do you want from me? If I say I don’t want to pay for dates, I’m a hypocritical feminist, if I say I am fine with paying, I’m lying to not be seen as a hypocritical feminist…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/22 06:30 PM
5

It’s not feminists’ fault that traditions are close to impossible to dismantle without the death of the people who follow them. I’m a feminist, and I’d be happy to pay. I’m merely explaining why the rest of the population acts this way.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/22 06:21 PM
1

There’s nothing inherently wrong with cheap coffee dates, but otherwise yeah.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/22 05:41 PM
26

they are forced to work for it Yea of course? What tf did you expect? That you could just randomly walk up to your “looksmatch” on the street and ask her to marry you and live happily ever after?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/04/22 03:55 PM
1

First thing, af gets relationships and exclusivity if he is interested. Attractive people have options. Crazy news. Second thing, casual sex even if it doesn't provide exclusivity, makes a man feel special more than a LTR as a general rule. That is because few men are able to get sex without having to meet the demands and expectations that come with a LTR. By “special”, do you mean “conventionally attractive”? Look in a mirror. I think af got what he wanted from her and got it for less. See prev…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/04/22 07:25 AM
2

Procastinating yet again. Why am I like this? 🤡
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/22 04:00 PM
0

Careful mate, the only thing preventing women from going misandrist is the knowledge that this isn't true. Are you deliberately trying to push women into FDS or something?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/22 03:57 PM
2

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/22 02:33 PM
0

Oh nooo, pipi can’t go in vivi for a week, how terrible that must be. 🥺🥺 Also, how do you plan to get sex more than once a week without a LTR? I imagine that’d be difficult and time consuming, even for Chad.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/04/22 02:28 PM
3

Exclusivity and feeling special to start. And prostitution provides neither. Neither does shallow casual sex, the AF deal. So why do you see that as the “better treatment”, “getting more” when the BB deal gets you the entire package; love, commitment, exclusivity and being special? But the wive is getting more from him. She is the one getting what she wants. His previous partners got less. The wife gets love and commitment and exclusivity and the feeling of being special, something his casual pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/22 04:44 PM
1

> If you actually think it solves it you fail to understand what the general male population wants from their female romantic partner. Maybe. Wat do they want? > Expecting/demanding more from the bb compared to the expectations/demands put on af is treating the bb worse then you treated the af. What? Everyone demands more from their romantic partner than other people lmao. Many men are willing to fuck anyone, but don't they expect their wives to be pretty, kind, responsible, loyal, etc.?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/22 03:44 PM
3

> Please elaborate. In which way the good girl getting commitment is getting worse treatment than the promiscuous woman that is only used for sex? Both the "beta" and the "good girl" get commitment and love and both the "alpha" and the "slut" get shallow sex. It's the same thing. > No. The difference is that men are willing and able to give the good girl whatever she values and women are either not willing or not able to give the bb what he values. If the beta doesn't value love and commitment, …
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/22 02:28 PM
6

> The difference is that the good girl is getting the best the man can give and the bb is not getting the best the woman can give. No contradiction. If you think the best a woman can give you is shallow sex, then that's on you, not the woman. The women employing the "AFBB strategy" think the exact same way about the alpha and the beta as men think about the sluts and the good girls, meaning both genders are equally "evil". The difference between these "strategies" exclusively lies in what the pa…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/22 11:51 AM
3

I think most people want a partner with a roughly equal amount of sexual experience.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/22 07:55 AM
2

What’s your definition of “hypergamous”?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/04/22 07:46 AM
3

Men without options are grateful for whatever option they find. They may wish that they had a better partner, but they're not going to find one, so their "disloyalty" will be limited to just looking. No girl gives a shit if a lack of opportunities prevent her boyfriend from acting on his disloyalty when he’s a disloyal cunt anyway.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/22 05:23 PM
0

Just wait a few more years. You will soon be forced to share the people’s toothbrush with your comrades.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/22 03:50 PM
5

I don’t believe many people are deliberately seeking out friends of one particular gender. But it’s kinda nice to have double the amount of potential friends, yknow. It’s sad having to rule out half the population when seeking company because some men can’t behave like decent people.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/22 03:30 PM
5

Then we can dunk on all the crying leftards about how it's a "private company". That line doesn’t work on us. :P The argument is for pointing out hypocrisy. Leftists are against private property in general, so for us there’s no hypocrisy in crying about companies being shit.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/22 03:18 PM
5

Because women generally are more interested in other people and their problems than men are.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/22 03:11 PM
1

A person who is not even slightly concerned about potentially raping someone should not be allowed to walk around freely.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/22 09:04 AM
-1

And honestly, you're concerned that you're contributing towards sex-trafficking? This is your concern? Not the fact that you may struggle to get regular sex otherwise? Worry about yourself, because I assure you, women worry about themselves and they don't care about the impact their hypergamous standards have on male mental health worldwide. Aight mate, this is way over the line, even for this subreddit. Get help, you sound outright dangerous.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/22 08:57 AM
4

Umm... Outside of sexual pleasure what does a woman provide to a man that a man can not also provide to her?? What? I’m not sure I understand.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/04/22 08:34 AM
2

Ask any man you know and they will know at least one man who has been through one of those things. Hell, they've probably been through it themselves. The question is, been through what? Friendzoning, I.e. not wanting to date someone you consider a friend, is not the same as using someone. Going on dates and then deciding to not be interested is not the same as using someone. The men who were rejected are not necessarily able to tell the difference, and if I ask them, I will always get their vers…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/22 08:55 PM
2

Also don't minimize the impact of women completely disregarding men's feelings when they use them for dates or friendzone them and use them for time and attention. From where did you get the idea that most women are playing this game? Personal experience? Projection? Actual data? Reading rage bait on r/antifeminists? Also, why do you have “blue pill” in your flair? You don’t sound very bluepilled.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/22 08:26 PM
1

I disagree. I believe most people have morals. Of course, we all generally put our own needs slightly above the needs of others, but it’s something else entirely to completely disregard other people’s feelings. You are the exception here. They are out for their interest, as they should be. So you are getting prescriptive now? Do you understand that people doing this will do nothing but make the world significantly worse for all of us?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/22 08:02 PM
1

I’m asking you why you believe women are playing the same game you are. Women’s allegedly immoral behavior was what you used as justification for your own actions. So I’m asking you how you know that women are actually doing it.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/22 07:22 PM
2

How do you even know that The Female Gender is actually playing this game? Have you fallen victim to this “game” yourself?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/22 07:10 PM
3

The “selfish women” out there are thinking the exact same thing. Prisoners dilemma. We won’t get anywhere as a society until one part stops being an egotistical asshole. Do your part.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/04/22 07:01 PM
2

TRP’s argument for the existence of these mating strategies is exclusively based in EvPsych. Your argument is that employing these two strategies simultaneously will lead to women being unhappy and alone. Ending up unhappy and alone is not a favourable position to be in evolutionarily speaking. Either you or TRP have to be wrong here, unless you disagree with point 3.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 07:50 PM
1

Your post is flaired CMV. Answering that is against the rules.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/04/22 07:04 AM
0

That’s so obviously not true. That would mean it’s easier for men to get a girlfriend than it is for women to get a boyfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 08:42 PM
4

What do you expect women to do besides state the obvious answer to the question asked?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 08:35 PM
4

It’s a ridiculously predictable post, “Women I deem less attractive than me always reject me, PPD please explain”. There are literally two possible answers; either you overestimate your own SMV, or you underestimate the women’s SMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 08:15 PM
0

That makes sense. Your comment could be read as saying men have higher standards for commitment than women, which I disagree with.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 08:03 PM
1

What else are they supposed to do? The looks and self image of the person saying they want an “equal partner” is more than relevant here.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 07:59 PM
-1

It’s way higher. Higher than what? Their own casual sex standards or women’s commitment standards?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 07:56 PM
12

Seems like it’s time for a sex strike lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 07:51 PM
1

Cuck traits = doormat, agreeable, being walked on, passive And not being insecure about your partner’s previous sex partners inherently implies those traits?
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 11:52 AM
1

Give me your own definitions of the terms “dominant” and “cuck” then.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/04/22 06:01 AM
1

Being a natural leader is the opposite of feeling aroused by your romantic partner fucking other people?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 08:11 PM
1

Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 11:21 AM
1

I agree with you, but the examples you give are weird. A man can’t be dominant and accept a woman’s high N? According to who?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/04/22 07:44 AM
2

That makes sense actually. View changed. :)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 08:02 PM
22

Everyone wins; her boundaries are respected What about the boundary of not wanting to be cheated on? 🧐
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 11:38 AM
1

As I understand it, your love language is the way you feel loved and express your own love. And I just don’t understand how one can see sex as this intimate thing between lovers that translates to telling the other person you love them, and also want to do the exact same act with complete strangers you certainly don’t love.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 07:25 AM
5

I have integrity too. I am an ethical egoist, and my actions consistently adhere to those principles. That’s why I deserve a Chad. Now. >:(
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 07:11 AM
3

Acting more like an “asshole” (i.e. confident and assertive) works great just in general when interacting with people. It makes you come off as less boring, like you actually have a personality. It’s a piece of advice I have made great use of when befriending both boys and girls since I was 12.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 07:00 AM
1

would you date Chad?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/04/22 06:13 AM
10

Having sex as a love language and enjoying casual sex is contradictory, CMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 05:24 PM
9

It will become illegal.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 01:38 PM
-2

I'd turn bi for her.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/04/22 09:30 AM
1

Yeah, I agree with that.
/r/ExRedPill08/04/22 09:30 PM
3

> Within our lifetime, government policy will be driven from academic departments of women who spent their formative years on tumblr writing homoerotic fanfiction. Eyyy, that's me! > This is not a happy reality. :(
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 08:44 PM
1

You can’t do much about your looks, so “women don’t want you cuz ur ugly lmao” doesn’t really work as advice. People like to focus on what they can control.
/r/ExRedPill08/04/22 03:46 PM
2

Trust me, I have no bias on favor of FDS. I’m merely saying they are more subtle in their bigotry. I have never seen the explicit biological essentialism that the manosphere is known for. Edgy “jokes”, yes, biased interpretations of intentions and situations based on gender, yes, misandry apologism, yes. But it’s difficult to justify banning people for that, because the hate is way too implicit.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 02:23 PM
7

FDS is VERY misandrist, don’t get me wrong, but as someone who spends a decent amount of time on both FDS and manosphere subs to report the fuckers, it’s easy to see why the latter awakens the admins and the former don’t. FDS are annoyingly good at dog whistling, and can hide behind the fact that they are mostly blaming men’s behaviour on socialisation, while subs like r/antifeminists are happy to openly scream about how women are biologically incapable of thinking logically. I don’t think there…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 01:55 PM
0

It just comes from being a man and knowing how men think. Most guys don’t go out of their way to befriend women that they aren’t at least somewhat attracted to or interested in. How men think is irrelevant. What matters is how the woman thinks. And I believe very few women would want to fuck a person they truly see as just a friend.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/04/22 05:49 AM
10

Ah yes, the survey-based n-count database. “-5” “69420” “80085” “10000000000“ You are an absolute genius.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 06:54 PM
3

Nailed it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 02:06 PM
0

Correlation causation. High body count doesn't cause increased divorce risk, it correlates with non-traditional values, which means a more relaxed view on sexuality and marriage. Translated to our car analogy, that would mean mileage correlates with age, and you want a newer car because better technology. And if you just want a newer car, why not just check the age of the car instead of being weird about its mileage?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 11:28 AM
1

The value goes down because the car gets worse when you drive in it. Vaginas do not get worse by having more dicks in it.
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 09:35 AM
-1

In this analogy, the mileage has zero impact on how good the car is. Would you still care?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/04/22 08:06 AM
-5

> we are emotional lmao, speak for yourself sis.
/r/AntiFeminists06/04/22 05:00 PM
3

Bitch, I’m 17 now. 😎
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 09:23 AM
3

I get noticeably fewer downvotes after removing my age from my flair. Ageism smh.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 08:47 AM
1

Tinder is 90% male.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/04/22 05:08 AM
1

It’s kinda difficult to not come to that conclusion when reading your comments lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 08:11 PM
3

Women like emotionless casual sex less than men. Amazing findings you got there.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 08:09 PM
1

What insightful or relevant thing is it possible to respond with to a person’s off topic bitter fantasies.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 08:04 PM
1

Someone got a little too caught up in complaining about relationships that he forgot the context of the conversation lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 07:55 PM
1

Lmao, u alright bro?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 07:54 PM
1

What is it about then? You are in a debate thread about whether hookers or romantic relationships are better.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 07:47 PM
1

I don’t care what you are personally doing with hookers, we are in a thread about the pros and cons of normal dating vs prostitution. You said nonmonogamy is cucked because your gf can fuck other men. That same logic applies to hookers too, so it doesn’t work as an argument in favor of seeking prostitution.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 07:44 PM
2

If the woman is poor enough, the financial incentive can be argued to be coercive.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 07:36 PM
1

Polygamous relationships were your gf can fuck other men are cucked, with all due respect. Your hooker can fuck other men too lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 07:34 PM
5

That’s good advice. It’s very unfortunate that TRP apparently is the only source of that kind of advice for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 07:32 PM
1

That’s 3 people lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 07:21 PM
2

I’d rather they got a prostitute than lie to some poor girl that they want something more than sex from her.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 07:17 PM
1

I wonder why you didn’t just show the overweight and obesity rates for men and women… 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 07:14 PM
3

Why not get a prostitute then?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 06:54 PM
-3

The “look better and be more of an asshole” advice is not exactly unique to TRP.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 04:09 PM
5

I won't date a person who believes child rape is good. Am I in an anti-pedophilia cult?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 02:33 PM
4

Which red pill answers resonated with you?
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 02:18 PM
1

You know I'm right.
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 11:39 AM
1

> Disingenuous comparison. Being tall doesn’t make a guy “hot”. What are you trying to say here? Being tall is undeniably an attractive trait in men. > Plenty of tall trolls out there. And plenty of non-fat ugly women out there. That doesn't mean not being fat isn't an attractive trait. You can be unattractive and still have some attractive qualities... > If I had 800 matches, I’d be reading bios for commonalities. With 800 matches, you could find more than one person with a good bio. How do you…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 11:30 AM
1

> OLD doesn't force people to do anything. You can still match with someone, chat to them for a while, see how vibe with them before making a decision. You have 800 women in your dm's begging you for a date. They all have an equal chance of having a nice personality. Which woman are you going to spend your time getting to know, fat Becky or supermodel Stacy? > The fact that so many women on this sub admit they wouldn't have swiped right on their boyfriends proves ... that your post is comlete bu…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/04/22 10:26 AM
-20

What’s your problem with feminism?
/r/AntiFeminists04/04/22 04:00 PM
-20

There are many different kinds of feminism. “Radical feminism” is the thing y’all are complaining about; they are not intersectional, the only thing they focus on is the oppression of women, and think that this oppression must be caused by the effort of men. Then there’s liberal feminism, an insult commonly thrown around in radfem spaces. This is the normie feminism, that seeks to involve both men and women in achieving gender equality through liberal democracy. The last big one is marxist/socia…
/r/AntiFeminists04/04/22 03:40 PM
-8

intersectionalist feminism. *radical feminism
/r/AntiFeminists04/04/22 03:09 PM
32

Existence is kinda cucked when you think about it: You are enjoying living in a world where women are fucking other men.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/04/22 12:21 PM
3

Good, now we are back on track. Are you seriously saying that men and women get an equal amount of shit for being assertive?
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/22 08:53 PM
2

“CRT” and intersectionality are there to point out that the sports teams already exist, because it’s necessary to acknowledge that if we want to get rid of them. It’s not ironic in the slightest.
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/22 08:52 PM
1

I do not deny that this is something that happens to both genders. The discussion was exclusively about whether this specific double standard exists or not, and whether that’s bad.
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/22 08:50 PM
2

Do you feel the same way about racial insults? Insults that target specific groups of people strengten the barriers between groups in a society in a way normal insults don’t. You create sports teams that only focus on the well being of their own in-group rather than on the betterment of society. I personally think that’s quite bad.
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/22 08:46 PM
0

That’s literally whataboutism. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whataboutism Pointing out an irrelevant wrongdoing of the opponent and acting like it’s an argument.
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/22 08:28 PM
-2

Whataboutism. Do you agree that it’s bad to use “bossy” as a gendered insult?
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/22 08:23 PM
-4

> And? We insult men that are virgin by calling them incels, we don't do the same for women. Yes, which is equally fucked up. Considering the amount of posts on this subreddit complaining about women doing this, it would look like you guys think that too. Or was it always just whataboutism?
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/22 08:04 PM
-9

> We call those women bossy, while for men we just call them assholes or dicks. You don't think the fact that we made up a whole ass word specifically dedicated to "too assertive women" indicates a gender bias? That women are taken less seriously as leaders, aren't being listened to as much, and are allowed less space and speaking time are facts well-substantiated by mountains of research. Denying it won't make it any less true.
/r/AntiFeminists03/04/22 07:32 PM
1

> Na i dont really think about ONS. You don't think women can think of their ONSs this way? I don't really understand the rest of what you said.
/r/seduction03/04/22 04:02 PM
1

Do you feel that way because you know it's how you are feeling about your one night stands, or because you believe women feel differently about one night stands than you do?
/r/seduction03/04/22 03:36 PM
7

My question is just why? Jealousy? Fetishization of innocence?
/r/seduction03/04/22 02:24 PM
2

> It's effort. This effort should be put in freely and willingly. A relationship takes effort, yes, but it should not be something you see as "payment" for sex. > This shows that women are two faced & not worth committing to. Because they are more willing to fuck sexually attractive people? Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 02:18 PM
2

What "price"? Do each and every woman demand the less good looking men pay her 500 bucks per fuck? Or is spending time with her the "price"?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 01:49 PM
1

> No it means you're a lieing slut. Why tf I lie on an anonymous debate forum, fuckwit. Since you don't trust my words, let's make up a hypothetical virgin woman instead: Would she be equally attracted to all men in the world?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 01:25 PM
1

> Firstly stop saying "your wife" and not attracted to "me", I'm from India and I can easily get a virgin woman to marry. Congratulations. > Not indulging in casual sex is a proof that she's as attracted to you as she's to any other man she slept with. Lol, how exactly? I have never had sex, does that mean I must be equally attracted to all people in the world? > single mother hood and hpv. Don't you have these things called "birth control" and "vaccines" in India?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 11:48 AM
8

> Men are okay if women choose men for security and company but only if she holds same standards for all men. WTF lmao. You fine with your wife not being attracted to you as long as she hasn't had casual sex? > If she has sex with chad the day she met him but makes rule for him, it just means she's not as attracted to him as she's to chad. Or it could mean that she cares more about his intentions than she cares about Chad's. If she is just not as attracted to you as she is to Chad, she is not as…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 10:43 AM
5

Retarded plan. How would refraining from casual sex mean that women would be less interested in a man's security and company?
/r/PurplePillDebate03/04/22 10:23 AM
5

Who said the incest couple will have kids? Old people having children does not exactly have zero issues either.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/22 08:07 PM
5

I am fine with age gap relationships like how I am fine with incest. If it’s genuinely just two consenting adults having some weird fetishes, go for it. But if I meet that kind of couple in the wild, I will be suspicious of potential abuse.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/22 07:52 PM
1

> Yes you can waste your hole live to get the world 1% into that direction and not live a real live or you can at least to a degree let go of some utopies and have a real live. Some people enjoy making the world a better place yk. That's a "real life" to me. > Especially if you are a female that all doors are open with 20 and many start to close at 30 and with 35 most are closed. Oh I cannot even describe how much I appreciate all those open doors leadin to sexual intercourse. Life will not even…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/22 12:45 PM
-1

May your inclination towards apathy and deliberate ignorance get you far in life, brother.
/r/AntiFeminists02/04/22 10:38 AM
2

Thanks. The first point is retarded, but I wasn't aware of the studies with contradicting results.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/22 10:36 AM
1

So, according to you, men are too lazy and unimaginative to do anything but accept the status quo, while women actievly try to improve society the best they can? 🤔 One of those are definitely more based than the other.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/22 10:30 AM
2

That would make the struggle self-inflicted. And I doubt that was what PeppinoGreen meant when they said women have it easy.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/04/22 06:53 AM
2

The "MuH fReEdOm" jokes are made specifically to make fun of conservatives' blatant hypocricy. Not because we don't like freedom lmao.
/r/AntiFeminists02/04/22 06:41 AM
2

> leads to *Correlates with
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/22 06:43 PM
1

So, only being satisfied with the best of the best is a sign of really struggling in life?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/04/22 06:36 PM
-4

It makes sense that you don’t like arguing; your entire political philosophy is based on nothing but your instinctual disgust responses. Your views will never be challenged by logic and reason, since that’s not what is influencing your views in the first place, so rational debate is worthless to you. I think that’s more cringe than a personal lifestyle choice could ever be. But you do you, caveman.
/r/AntiFeminists01/04/22 01:18 PM
-3

When the r/Cringetopia user has no argument. 😳
/r/AntiFeminists01/04/22 07:23 AM
-5

> Any woman who actually wants a family (her choice which by feminist doctrine is her right) is laughed at Is the left woman on slide 3, the artist's own mother, laughed at here? I see two smiling women being happy with their own life choices. But you have to pretend that you see something else, right? You have to attack a strawman, because you conservatives can't admit that you despise the actual message of this insta page; freedom.
/r/AntiFeminists01/04/22 07:05 AM
7

Are you implying that women aren't aware that being fat will make people view them as less attractive? Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 07:18 PM
-1

And it’s common for me to experience things like sharing a glass of Nutella with in the middle of the night in a tent, discussing everything ranging from science, politics and philosophy to our childhood memories and deepest insecurities. Not to mention, these “personal experiences” are completely worthless anyway when it comes to making generalizations about big populations. Your life experience with female friendships has a sample size of like, 6, and is based on your outside perspective as a …
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/22 04:59 PM
1

Can you link the study? When I googled, I could only find ones saying lesbians and gays are equally likely to experience domestic violence.
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/22 04:12 PM
-1

The lesbian domestic abuse thing is very complicated and far from conclusive. And even if there’s no doubts about lesbians being more likely to do domestic violence, there would be a high chance that it’s caused by something other than the femaleness of lesbians. I think one of the other “many studies” would be more useful here.
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/22 03:48 PM
2

What’s shocking?
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/22 03:31 PM
1

I haven’t seen any evidence that women are worse to each other than men. Only people’s “personal experience”, something that contradicts my “personal experience”.
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/22 03:22 PM
-7

what about yours? Lack of scientific evidence for the contrary.
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/22 03:11 PM
-11

Nah, I’m done guessing, where do you get your views from?
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/22 02:57 PM
-7

Sounds like someone got their views on female friendships from shitty American teenage movies.
/r/AntiFeminists31/03/22 02:52 PM
0

But you do care about your wife’s looks and her ability to have sex with you, right? I’d guess women are more tolerant of these factors than men are. Which might be why women are less likely to leave their partners if they get very sick. Men don’t have fewer conditions, they just have different conditions.
/r/PurplePillDebate31/03/22 02:08 PM
1

True. But I have seen a concerning number of blue pill normies with that same mindset too.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 06:40 PM
3

LTR’ing with the bottom 20% of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 01:23 PM
1

No. But a bigger percentage of them would be red pill and/or would value sex to a degree I would be uncomfortable with.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/03/22 04:59 AM
1

I wouldn't want my car to be used for Uber by my friend. Why?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 03:53 PM
1

If all there is to a relationship is sex, how is it cheating to have purely emotional connections with others? 🤔
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 03:38 PM
1

Yes, and I have come to realize that it’s for a good reason.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 02:36 PM
3

That you should probably wait with sex if you intend to date someone seriously, unless you want to risk ending up with a red piller.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 11:56 AM
0

Based.
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 11:39 AM
3

What do men talk about?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 11:35 AM
1

Dude, we are talking about falling in love here. Have you been in love with 80% of the women you have ever met?
/r/PurplePillDebate29/03/22 11:29 AM
1

How much so ranges, but yes, a man's ability to maintain a relationship goes up exponentially the less his girl deserves him. Duh. Do you think Stacy would have a hard time maintaining a relationship with the average man? My sister actually cat ladies herself like that, Good luck to her and her pets.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/22 12:37 PM
1

femaledatingstrategy feminist Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/22 12:12 PM
4

Her point is that she, as a woman, wants to see more of it…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/03/22 12:09 PM
1

The comments and experiences of most of the users on this sub, both men and women. Men say that they would have sex with most women. Women say that they would have sex with very few men. That could just as well be explained by a gender disparity in libido that causes one gender to be more desperate for sex than the other. And I believe Occam's Razor is applicable here.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 06:59 PM
5

Rapist.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 06:45 PM
3

Wraaah, other people do it tooo so it’s okaaaaaayyyy!!
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 05:47 PM
45

Depends on what level we are talking about. Guys I would not immediately and completely rule out of ever wanting to do something with? 90% (of the ones my age, of course). Guys I will actively admire the looks of? 40%. Guys I will for fun fantasise about getting to know? 2%. (These will usually have some remarkable things going on; funnily dyed hair, T-shirt signalling a shared hobby or something). Guys I actively want to pursue something with? 0,01%. (Only a couple people, and only people I alr…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 05:37 PM
5

Man be saying he would rape if it wasn’t illegal. 😑
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 05:01 PM
0

From the beginning, I only responded to the assertion that it’s somehow relevant whether you are your partners “best” or not. That’s not me choosing the good parts, that’s me choosing the parts I disagree with. Are you willing to concede the specific point that not being your partners “best” doesn’t inherently mean your partner doesn’t love you?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 04:58 PM
2

Rape is a very effective way of getting sex too. Doesn’t make it ethical.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 04:13 PM
3

Women judging you on your income is not the same as them not being able to love you. A sugar baby is not going to love you at all.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 04:05 PM
0

It still works if we are only focusing on the part of your post that says that not being your partner’s “best” is something worth worrying about.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 03:19 PM
0

In my analogy, the potential owners are the experienced and inexperienced people. Not the puppy. The puppy is you, choosing which owner you would prefer. And I am specifically responding to the part of your OP where you say a person will not be their promiscuous partner’s best.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 03:01 PM
0

Feel free to elaborate.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 02:55 PM
0

The need to feel secure that you have people around you who can take care of you is a lot lower in the hierarchy of needs than the desire to be in the same romantic relationship forever, and so will have less severe psychological consequences if it is not fulfilled. That’s why your analogy is useless while mine is genius. Now answer, would puppy be less loved if adopted by a family that has known and loved a lot of dogs?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 02:55 PM
1

I’m sorry to go that route, but source? Or even just an anecdote that can explain why you believe this. To me this sounds like a total random assertion based on absolutely nothing but a man’s desire to have anything resembling an explanation for why women act differently than them. This explains why attractive women do not just have sex with average men, Well, yes it does. But other theories could explain it too. Like women merely wanting the best man they can get, which happens to not be men wi…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 02:46 PM
0

Flock animals needing basic security is hilariously far from a human’s need for love, I don’t even know what to say. It’s comparable to a 3 year old being passed around by 7 different set of parents. Trust me, that child will be a whole lot more fucked up than a person with 7 previous romantic partners. compared animals with humans and that makes no sense Humans are nothing but animals, mate. Also, I didn’t compare humans to animals, I focused on the human experience of love, a response that fun…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 02:29 PM
0

Like do you really think you are so special that despite all of people in his/her past you would be the best of best they would settle for forever? Imagine a puppy. This puppy will be adopted soon; either by a person who has never had a dog, or a person who had 3 dogs as a child. Do you think this puppy would be less loved by the person with the 3 previous dogs, because the owner would compare it to the previous dogs, some of them most likely being better than the puppy in some ways? Or do you t…
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 02:09 PM
6

As I said, aromantic. Btw you should probably stop lying to women about your feelings for them.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 01:42 PM
7

Romance? If you can’t see the value in that, feel free to just do FWB. You may be aromantic. The rest of us enjoy being intimate with people we love.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 01:27 PM
16

You can be in a relationship without dedicating your entire life to them, yk. Think of a relationship as just an FWB but with romantic feelings. They are one of several important people in your life, and they make your life more enjoyable while you are with them. Where’s the “sacrifice” and lost “investment” in that?
/r/PurplePillDebate27/03/22 09:03 AM
1

but none of them need to be better than him in some way. But a man needs to be better than the woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 08:11 PM
1

I spent a lot of time popcorn watching incel communities.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 07:58 PM
1

Google him. He’s some kind of mascot/meme among incels.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 07:49 PM
1

Ok that’s on me for forgetting what I wrote lol. You are probably right that a not insignificant number of them are ok looking. But if we include personality in a person’s overall attractiveness, pretty much all of them would be considered unattractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 07:42 PM
1

St. BlackOps2Cel
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 07:32 PM
3

If the difference between men’s “polygyny” and women’s “hypergamy” is that women would choose the one best guy and not fuck anyone else, whereas men would choose both, wouldn’t that just be monogamy?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 07:28 PM
1

If they were attractive shouldn’t they be able to get laid?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 06:15 PM
1

There’s no evidence that suggests that women are more shallow than men, and even if there was, whether someone’s standards are shallow or not is not relevant to the conversation we are having.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 06:14 PM
1

being unattractive doesn't make you an incel. Huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 05:58 PM
1

The skinny, hideous men without career. Look, this is simplified to the point where it makes zero sense anymore. But the point is, if you have no luck with women as a skinny hideous incel meme posting loser, overweight women are likely your best and close to only shot at dating, as it’s quite rare for a skinny woman in the US to be considered so unattractive that her SMV matches yours.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 05:56 PM
1

I don’t really understand what you are saying.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 05:41 PM
2

If you post on incel forums, you are with no doubt below average.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 05:39 PM
1

Explain.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 04:58 PM
2

Hideous, overweight men with a career, maybe.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 04:57 PM
2

So it’s basically just a scarier word for “monogamous”?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 03:42 PM
8

This has nothing to do with what I personally value, but what the majority of people value. A fat man with a good career is probably going to do better in dating than a fat woman with a good career, do you disagree?
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 03:36 PM
0

Having high standards for personality is not different than having high standards for looks.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 03:33 PM
5

Because I suspect a person’s weight is of higher priority for men than for women.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 02:57 PM
4

How is it a false equivalency? You are rejecting people who you deem not good enough for you regardless of what is causing their lower SMV.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 02:54 PM
11

If you have no hobbies, no job and a hideous face, it will be difficult for you to get a skinny woman. That’s true, whether you think it’s fair or not.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 02:26 PM
8

How is that relevant? Whether it’s controllable or not doesn’t matter if people are not controlling it. People are still fat.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 02:15 PM
12

If you are below average looking yourself, yes.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 02:12 PM
9

Ah yes, all those obese cave-women dying from eating way too much cave-macdonalds. I remember.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 01:48 PM
5

It’s perfectly reasonable to have high standards. You do you buddy. The problem is people bitching and moaning about how women are unreasonable because they have high standards, while you yourself are ruling out half of the population.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 01:42 PM
25

I was on r/incelswithouthate for a while. It was quite funny watching them go “I would do anything for a girlfriend! 🥺🥺🥺 (but I don’t want a fatty).”
/r/PurplePillDebate26/03/22 12:27 PM
2

No. :,(
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 08:12 PM
1

You might be on to something. Hummus is good.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 08:11 PM
2

Diversity is the main problem though! I just want to be able to eat cereal for the rest of my life lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 08:00 PM
4

Healthy food fucking sucks.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 06:55 PM
1

yeschad.png
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 06:44 PM
7

women are not entitled to make men wait. … You didn’t think that one through, did you? Lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 03:41 PM
2

Nah, that’s not aspie math. That’s retard math.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 03:37 PM
7

I disagree. If waiting for sex was a legitimate sign that a person is not into you, it would be perfectly reasonable to be concerned about it. It’s not entitlement, it’s just wanting a partner who genuinely likes you. The real problem is that these men are wrong when they assume that a woman waiting for sex means she is not attracted to them.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 03:25 PM
5

Have you considered whether there may just be a link between age and n-count?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/03/22 05:45 AM
2

If you aren’t a millionaire and avoid dating conservatoids and religious weirdos, it probably happens so rarely that you don’t have to worry. Think about it; what’s the benefit of being in a relationship with a person you don’t even like? Kids? You can easily get them without a partner these days. Money? Again, if you aren’t a millionaire, that means spending several hours a day lying to your partner about liking them for an extra few thousand dollars a month, what a great deal. Companionship? T…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 06:58 PM
1

Yeah, agree. there are many, many different forms of value.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 05:06 PM
1

Because you’ve been on 20 dates and been disappointed each time. Maybe it’s time to shake it up? Or it’s time to give up on OLD. But some people actually do “shake it up” sometimes. They just don’t do it often enough to satisfy all of you. Even if women swiped 100% randomly, the fact that men make up 80% of Tinder would still mean that the odds would be stacked against you. I find it so laughable that women constantly talk about how deep and emotion driven their attraction is and then exclusivel…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 05:03 PM
1

SMV stands for sexual market value. And the market doesn’t give one single shit about what you personally think of the quality of the product.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 04:53 PM
6

Because “there’s more to real attraction” doesn’t mean “the things you can see in a picture doesn’t matter at all”. If there’s a 20% chance that you will be attracted to Chad and a 10% chance that you will be attracted to Average Guy, why shouldn’t you choose the one with the higher chance of success?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 04:13 PM
-1

“Mental gymnastics” is the new name for economics, apparently. In a simple world, supply and demand dictates value, correct? And we agree that there’s a lower supply of and higher demand for women than men in the sexual market place, right? That would make women’s market value higher than men’s.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 03:41 PM
-1

Lol at all the people here trying to argue against the entire field of economics.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 03:33 PM
1

You could argue that the woman did indeed have a SMV of 8, and that women just have higher SMV on average.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/03/22 03:32 PM
3

Sure.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/22 02:09 PM
1

Subconsciously being attracted to characteristics that signal status, wealth and strength is universes away from gold digging, i.e. consciously choosing to marry a person you are not attracted to for their money.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/22 02:08 PM
-7

As we all know, you aren’t allowed to not be satisfied if there are people having it worse than you.
/r/AntiFeminists23/03/22 01:49 PM
1

I think you are among the very few people who feel that way. If you were correct, and people can just “make it work” with what they have, we’d have zero unhappy people.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/22 01:29 PM
1

The perceived hypocrisy would be intact in the following: “Women: Everyone is entitled to their standards, we shouldnt lower it for anyone. Men: I want to date children Women: REEEEEEE .....”
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/22 01:26 PM
2

Lmao, are you really saying men don’t virtue signal?
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/22 12:53 PM
0

Do you think men “control the narrative” when women do it? (Nooooo, I don’t care about height or muscles, I am attracted to personality UwU).
/r/PurplePillDebate23/03/22 06:20 AM
1

Truuu. I am going to the SWC (Secret Woman Conference) next week with all the world’s women to discuss the next step in our plan to introduce the new world order involving the enslavement of all moids. 😳
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/22 03:51 PM
-1

Do you believe you could "make it work" if you were forced to marry a man? (I am assuming you are a straight man yourself).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/03/22 06:26 AM
2

"Moral standards" is implied. Otherwise, being against literal pedophilia would be hypocricy too.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/03/22 07:16 PM
8

Basically women know she can use him as a fall guy if she ever ends up on the wrong side of 30/sometime 40’s and is now looking for husband (aka resource machine). Thinking that the person who friendzoned you secretly likes you is of course a whole other level of stupid, but believing that you are as much as her backup option is still a delusion that probably stems from you thinking way too highly of yourself and your precious “resources”. These women are obviously mentally ill people who enjoy …
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 03:15 PM
-1

Two identical Chads. Chad 1 yells at a service worker, Chad 2 is nice to them. Do you think Chad 1 will be more successful with women than Chad 2, because of this behavior?
/r/PurplePillDebate20/03/22 07:43 AM
1

Seize the means of reproduction, comrade.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 06:51 PM
-1

Lmao, that was a fun read. I love having my gender and age in my flair; always brings out the best in people. If you want to call it toxic something, then it's toxic feminity You have an embarrassingly terrible understanding of the terms we are discussing. It’s called “toxic masculinity” because it relates to the masculine gender role, not because men are responsible for creating it. “Toxic masculinity” would still be the correct term if the toxic standards turned out to be coming from alien cat…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 04:10 PM
0

There’s “do this or be a virgin forever and be treated like shit by everyone in your life” Dude, that is literally the societal expectations we are talking about. Feminine virgins being treated like shit for existing is literally toxic masculinity.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 11:55 AM
1

Bonus points are not requirements. You are making some really weird equivalencies here. They aren’t for women either. But the fact that women have options means that the bonus points will be what decides whether a man gets a yes or a no. They are still bonus points, they aren’t requirements, but they may come off as such to the men who get rejected. It would be the exact same for you if you reject one of these hypothetical woman based on bonus points. Its not that you can 'take it'. Its more tha…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 08:20 AM
0

Obviously. Supply and demand.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 07:58 AM
-1

Well, I do agree with you that the term is toxic. But I haven’t seen it being used much outside of PPD, and it’s not like we refrain from using toxic and dehumanizing terms when talking about women here.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 07:52 AM
1

Did you miss something? I don't care that she made me wait at all for sex, I said that right in the OP. I really did enjoy her company and spending time with her. She wouldn’t know that, though. She can’t necessarily tell the difference between someone lying to get sex and someone telling the truth. Making people wait and watching if they are willing to invest in the relationship without the sex is the most effective way of figuring out peoples true intentions. A pump ‘n dump Chad is not going t…
/r/PurplePillDebate19/03/22 07:41 AM
1

I’d personally assume she just wanted to make sure you were invested in the relationship and wanted something besides the sex. Considering she did have sex with you eventually, why would you think she wasn’t attracted to you? After all, if she didn’t want to be with you, she could have just not.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 08:51 PM
1

In this the 'bonus points' come into play. Those arent requirements. because they have the options, the preferences can (and usually do) become requirements. So, having options doesn’t turn bonus points into requirements when it’s you doing the picking, but it does when it is women? How? Yes, a list with more items on it is a more extensive list. That means more things to meet. If “being attractive” implicitly includes having long hair and not being fat, writing “long hair and not obese” instead…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 08:39 PM
8

It is possible for men to reinforce toxic masculinity too. Like how it’s possible for women to reinforce misogyny and beauty standards. Think of insults like “cuck” or “soyboy”; do these normally come from women?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 07:12 PM
7

Women aren’t a part of society?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 07:03 PM
8

True. But the dehumanization and toxic incel behavior is an inherent part of PPD culture; you won’t be able to do away with it without banning the whole subreddit.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 06:50 PM
1

Nothing outside of the bare minimums matter. Two women are in front of you. Neither of them are obese, have kids, or are on drugs, and they are both willing to marry you. How do you decide which one of them you want? Do you make them play rock, paper, scissors? Womens ‘preferences’ are non negotiable No. But women’s preferences may come off as non negotiable to you, simply because they have enough options to afford rejecting men based on not-so important preferences. If a man is rejected by a wo…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 05:50 PM
2

Congrats, you won PPD. This is the most based and true post this subreddit has ever seen and will ever come to see.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 03:35 PM
1

So you do have requirements. And you have a series of traits that give “bonus points”, correct? How is that different from women’s preferences?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 03:16 PM
29

Toxic masculinity is a term for the societal expectation of men to always be masculine. A high value man is just a man that is attractive to women, (including to women who may be influenced by toxic masculinity).
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 03:05 PM
2

Oh yeah agreed.
/r/AntiFeminists18/03/22 02:56 PM
1

Maybe PPD women don’t realize that we don’t have ‘requirements’ like a lot of women do. I sure hope you have at least some requirements lol. Or do you consider the characteristics “alive”, “human”, and “adult” mere bonus points?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 02:54 PM
1

Explain?
/r/AntiFeminists18/03/22 02:38 PM
1

What’s alarming is when even the ones who aren’t worthy think they’re better than you. Dude, you just stated that only one in a million women are worth dating… are you personally in the top 0,0001 of men?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/03/22 02:26 PM
-1

FDS is against casual sex though. Women who enjoy one night stands are "pickme's" according to them.
/r/AntiFeminists17/03/22 06:55 PM
1

Been around for 2 years, it's still highly entertaining. This is not the only debate forum where people are going over the same points over and over and over. It doesn't really bother me; if I am being honest, I am here more for the debate itself than the actual points being debated.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/03/22 06:38 PM
0

do you genuinely deny that women have a significant advantage In the ability to find casual sex? Absolutely not. In the ability to find relationships? Hmm. They may have a slight advantage still, but it’s very close to being insignificant. Most women want relationships, and the population is 50/50 men and women after all. that men are regularly forced to settle below their SMV Per definition, the people you can pull are equal to you in SMV. You may have meant whether we think men in average have…
/r/PurplePillDebate16/03/22 05:53 PM
1

I never said anything about “harassing black people”. If a white person wrote a book where they called society’s idea that black people are subhuman cotton pickers “toxic blackness”, in an attempt to combat this toxic blackness (I.e combat racism), how is that racist?
/r/AntiFeminists16/03/22 07:46 AM
0

So, you are ok with society treating black people as only good for picking cotton? And you are calling me racist?
/r/AntiFeminists15/03/22 05:27 PM
0

the term very blatantly frames masculinity (read: men) as the problem. Masculinity (as in society's idea of masculinity), is indeed the problem. And you are the weird one for treating masculinity and men as synonymous. Just imagine if a group of white karens coined a term "Toxic Blackness", and started trying to convince black people that they are experiencing "Toxic Blackness", and that's the root of all their problems. If "toxic blackness" here means society's toxic idea that black people are …
/r/AntiFeminists15/03/22 04:14 PM
0

I'm not advocating for gender roles. I'm not saying this is good or bad; it's just how it is. You may not be advocating for gender roles, but you are obviously indifferent to them. And indifference doesn’t change society either. My point is that the term "Toxic Masculinity" is misandristic I get how it may sound misandrist if you have no idea what the term means and assume the word “masculinity” stands for “male characteristics” and not “society’s idea of male characteristics”. But when it’s use…
/r/AntiFeminists15/03/22 01:39 PM
1

How did you infer that she thought the other guy was better?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/03/22 01:22 PM
2

That’s great. You too. 😊
/r/AntiFeminists15/03/22 01:15 PM
0

Chill, I don't live on Reddit. I'm from Denmark.
/r/AntiFeminists14/03/22 07:28 PM
0

It's once again the nature/nurture debate. If you believe the current gender roles are an inherent part of humanity, feel free to believe that. Have your fun while the rest of us tries to improve society. But if you believe sexual attraction and being an asshole to people you aren't sexually attracted to are biological and therefore unchangeable, why do you people here post and complain about the Tinder women who call short men subhuman? Isn't it just natural then? > the term is just terrible an…
/r/AntiFeminists14/03/22 07:22 PM
8

> But I’m supposed to be in my prime in my 20s right? Well, that's when the women in their 20's will be most attracted to you. But if you are willing to date women your own age when you get older, you will most likely get more options as you age, actually. > Also wanting a loving boyfriend usually involves some sort of financial stability People want financially stable partners for practical reasons. It has nothing to do with the actual desire for a life partner. > your emotional needs to be met…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 06:54 PM
0

> 10? I’d be ecstatic if it was just 10 at this point. All surveys we have suggest it's less than 10. Even among men, who we know usually inflate their counts.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 06:41 PM
-5

Feminist groups in my country are fighting with teeth and nails to either abolish the draft or make it gender neutral. You are making up hypocrisy to be outraged by.
/r/AntiFeminists14/03/22 03:18 PM
-1

Your assumptions and attempt at virtue signalling have no effect on me. I'm a man, not a woman. Save it for someone who gives a shit. “Virtue signaling” lmao, your sexist stereotypes may be negatively affecting your reading comprehension. I was sarcastically mocking your ignorant perspective. That isn't toxic masculinity. That's just being an asshole. Women can be assholes too. It can be both. Shouting slurs at black people can be reduced to asshole behavior too. But as a person who cares about …
/r/AntiFeminists14/03/22 02:34 PM
6

Sus.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 02:32 PM
2

Average number of lifetime sex partners is like 4-8. Average woman is not exactly a whore.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 02:24 PM
8

You can lower your libido artificially if it’s really so difficult to live with. It’s not as materialistic a desire as how most women seem to choose their partners. Guys just wanna get their dick wet sometimes but girls want you indefinitely as a pawn in their life. Oooohh nooooo, wanting a loving boyfriend instead of shallow hookups, how materialistic! 🥺
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 01:47 PM
1

Do you mean that figuratively, or did she literally say “Chad was better”?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 12:39 PM
1

Tell me, why is the MnM poisoned just because a woman doesn’t want to associate with cockroaches who lie about what they want to get sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/03/22 12:37 PM
1

What do you think was going on inside her head? She dated you, she had sex with you, do you think she didn’t like you?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 04:19 PM
2

See! By waiting with sex, by making the relationship not worth the effort for people who do not specifically want the relationship, you’ve just made a perfect filter for all the cockroaches who lie about what they want from you. /thread
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 04:10 PM
1

If you see spending time with a woman as an “investment” to get sex as the “outcome”, you are the exact reason why women are pulling this trick, lmao.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/03/22 04:00 PM
1

It’s the difference between simply being a tall person, and calling someone a manlet for being short. I wouldn’t call those “the exact same thing”. which is funny because you described what women demand, not men. Toxic masculinity is enforced by women too, yes.
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/22 03:56 PM
2

No, masculinity is simply the state of being male. No, masculinity is characteristics associated with being male. Look it up in any dictionary; that’s the definition you’ll get. Does that mean that men who are not tall, stoic etc are not masculine? Yes, I’d say he’s not masculine, or at least is less masculine than a tall, stoic person. Mind you, as a gender abolitionist, I believe that the whole concept of masculinity is complete bullshit and toxic masculinity on its own, but still, yes, accord…
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/22 03:53 PM
1

Masculinity is when a man happens to be tall, stoic, confident, etc. Toxic masculinity is when a man is expected to be tall, stoic, confident etc., and is treated badly when he isn’t these things.
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/22 10:18 AM
0

I’m not sure what you mean.
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/22 07:17 AM
-3

What you just described here is toxic femininity. Only women care if a man is tall, muscular, stoic, and rich. Ffs dude, you have absolutely no idea what these terms mean. The word “masculinity” is not there to describe who is doing the toxicity, it describes who the victims of the toxicity are. If it is indeed only women who care about these traits, it would still be toxic masculinity, as the problem would still be “toxic societal expectations placed on men”, regardless of who exactly are respo…
/r/AntiFeminists13/03/22 07:14 AM
1

Its toxic femininity when femininity is used in toxic ways. Again, what you are describing is someone taking advantage of benevolent sexism. That is Benevolent sexism. No, benevolent sexism is sexist ideas that benefit women. Toxic femininity is basically the opposite of that; sexist ideas that restrict women’s behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/03/22 08:35 AM
-1

It’s quite simple, actually. Masculinity is when you just happen to fit society’s idea of what an ideal man is. Masculinity includes being tall, being muscular, being stoic, being rich, etc. Toxic masculinity is society’s expectations of men to live up to these ideas of masculinity. Toxic masculinity includes things like the expectation of men to be tall, the expectation of men to be muscular, the expectation of men to be stoic, and the expectation of men to be rich.
/r/AntiFeminists12/03/22 07:54 AM
1

When women use their femininity at the detriment of others who are innocent, that is what makes it toxic. This is toxic behavior, not toxic femininity. Toxic femininity is society’s toxic expectations of femininity and women, it is not “toxic things women do”.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/22 08:23 PM
0

I’m sorry, that’s on me for asking you to only read 1 sentence. From the same page you found your definition: Benevolent sexism includes valuing feminine-stereotyped attributes in females (e.g., nurturance) and a belief that traditional gender roles are necessary to complement one another. Benevolent sexism also includes the view known as paternalism that females need to be protected by males.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/22 05:51 PM
0

What you are talking about is called benevolent sexism. Toxic femininity is something vastly different. read some books before you try teaching others. Dude, you’re embarrassing yourself. Come back when you have read a single sentence of a Wikipedia article.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/22 05:30 PM
1

No, that’s not what toxic femininity is.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/03/22 04:30 PM
1

Yeah that sounds pretty close to my experiences. Thanks for the explanation. :)
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 08:19 PM
3

You can find the averages too, though.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 07:40 PM
1

I think that women don't understand this often because from what I know women aren't walking around having the experience of being attracted to men ( for the straight population) all the time. So it's like a much stronger experience for them to BE attracted to someone. Ok, I get it. I think it’s pretty much the same for women, though, with the “background noise” feeling, except maybe it happens a bit less often for us. Have you experienced this background noise turning into stronger, more active…
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 07:13 PM
2

Once again a case of “being desperate is the same as not being shallow”.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 06:39 PM
2

Alright, great. In the studies I have seen where the gender disparities are the biggest, men report having around 2 more lifetime partners than women. If we assume these sexual encounters are between 1 man and 1 woman, the average will be the exact same for both genders. Women are very much not secretly running around slaying 10 chads a week.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 06:27 PM
2

Are you more willing to trust what men report?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 05:41 PM
1

Oh I know that. But do you usually fall in love with your friends to such a degree that you can no longer consider it a friendship?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 05:10 PM
1

An woman who I find even mildly possibly attractive who has a personality I enjoy instantly becomes attractive to me. Januaryphilosopher was talking about romantic attraction, not merely sexual attraction, like you seem to. Have you developed romantic crushes on each and every one of your female friends except two?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 04:49 PM
1

If the energy isn't reciprocated, move on. Your not her boyfriend Maybe I’m being pedantic, but does this imply that it’s ok when your girlfriend doesn’t reciprocate the energy?
/r/PurplePillDebate10/03/22 04:10 PM
1

According to red pill theory, hypergamy is strictly biological. Meanwhile, toxic masculinity/femininity is, definitionally, a product of socialization. These two things have nothing to do with each other, unless you’ll argue that being attracted to attractive men is learned behavior.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 01:52 PM
1

This should be a poll!
/r/PurplePillDebate09/03/22 01:05 PM
2

Who said they want a hot guy who’s settling? Obviously they want a hot guy who’s crazily into them… It may be an unrealistic goal, but hey, if they think that’s the only kind of relationship that’s worth it, why would they want to settle for less?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/03/22 03:35 PM
1

Men wearing skirts really has nothing to do with feminism. It does, though. Feminism is about deconstructing gendered double standards, and men not being able to wear skirts is certainly that.
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 03:56 PM
1

How so? Feel free to make an argument. :)
/r/AntiFeminists07/03/22 02:23 PM
1

So, the white slave owners who impregnated their slaves were not racist?
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 08:59 PM
1

The slave owners were not racist. That’s certainly a take.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 08:55 PM
1

Nice. It must have been amazing for all the slaves in history to know that their owners wouldn’t want to rape them.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 08:48 PM
1

So, it is possible for a man to want sex while also being prejudiced against women?
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 08:38 PM
1

So, you can’t have sex with people you are prejudiced against? That would have been great news for the slaves.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 08:35 PM
2

You can justify literally any and all comments that way, though. Literally anything could be argued to be a joke if you tried hard enough.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 08:24 PM
2

since he wants to fuck with women, So, you can’t be a misandrist if you fuck men?
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 08:22 PM
2

So you’ll agree that this is misogynistic?
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 08:08 PM
-1

History is a soft science, mate. And I am not really sure how history of all things is supposed to answer the question of whether women are capable of logic or not lol.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 08:07 PM
0

Bro it’s kinda female brained of you to value people’s subjective feeling-based opinions higher than objective, quantitative data.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 07:39 PM
1

Ah yes, the masculine logical logic of relying on your personal feelings and intuition instead of hard data. Lol.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 07:12 PM
1

Well, it is quite literally beyond me when you aren’t willing to link anything.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 06:51 PM
1

Give me an example of a comment you would consider misandrist.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 06:44 PM
2

Do you believe misandry exists?
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 06:34 PM
1

I respect your libertarian mod practices, but it’s pretty bizarre to pretend that this can be interpreted as a joke.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 06:33 PM
3

Are you willing to commit to the position that not a single person in this world have negative prejudices against women?
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 05:48 PM
0

Facts can usually be backed up by evidence.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 05:09 PM
0

they meant it as a joke, Dude…
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 05:08 PM
0

Copy pasted from the google dictionary: misogyny /mɪˈsɒdʒ(ə)ni/ noun: misogyny dislike of, contempt for, or ingrained prejudice against women.
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 05:06 PM
-2

I’d be very careful awakening the mods if I was you, considering how clearly and obviously you broke rule 1. 😉
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 03:41 PM
-6

It’s immensely hilarious watching this subreddit make comments like these and in the same breath bitch and moan about being called misogynistic!
/r/AntiFeminists06/03/22 03:33 PM
2

Well, there’s a pretty big difference between being “attracted” to someone because of what they can provide, and being attracted to someone for their personality traits. But if our hypothetical guy said something like “I didn’t initially think of my wife as my type, as I wasn’t used to dating bigger women, but I very quickly fell for her remarkable talent and charming passion for cooking, that made me want to listen to her speak about her hobby for hours”, that would be adorable.
/r/PurplePillDebate06/03/22 11:59 AM
1

Idc about the ethics of social media. What I care about is whether calling your bf short on PPD is less ethical than sharing any other personal details.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 08:59 PM
4

There’s a reason why women even have that advantage to begin with. And it’s directly because they value having that advantage much, much less than men would. They shouldn’t “trust” you, because you are looking at women’s situation through the eyes of someone with a male sex drive.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 08:57 PM
1

Whether sharing personal stuff on social media in a general sense is ethical or not is a very different conversation than the one we are having about whether it’s mean to say your bf is short.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 08:41 PM
1

We have kinda shifted the conversation away from the topic of these specific comments some women make, onto the broader ethics of sharing things about people on social media. And it seems like a weird time to bring this up, because in comparison to the detailed descriptions of people’s sex life you can find on various relationship subreddits, dropping your partner’s height is pretty fucking lame.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 07:56 PM
0

you don’t need to look at alimony/divorce rates to prove that. Indeed we don’t, because it does not function as proof at all. Also what part of what OC said had anything to do with boundaries? Loving “unconditionally” is loving someone no matter what they do. And that’s not exactly a healthy thing.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 07:33 PM
1

*In an anonymous Reddit thread.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 07:27 PM
2

Well, it might not be the most romantic way of describing it, but is it wrong? After all, “love” and “happiness” are also things people provide.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 02:38 PM
1

Go women! Forever the bestest gender 😎👌🥇🎖🏆 /j If you think having boundaries in a relationship is some evil woman thing, it’s kinda on you, pal.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 02:35 PM
3

Nobody’s perfect, we all have good traits and bad traits. Are you saying it is impossible for someone to acknowledge their partner’s obvious weaknesses without it being insulting? If roles were reversed, women wouldn't want to hear stuff like that either. Hear what? A mere acknowledgment that I am not literally a flawless goddess and objectively the absolute #1 best in the world at everything across all categories?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 01:32 PM
3

That she’s not 8 feet tall?
/r/PurplePillDebate04/03/22 06:06 AM
11

No, he was giving great examples of women saying their SO’s aren’t attractive, which is heavily implied to mean “conventionally attractive”.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 07:35 PM
0

That's her ex, she's known him longer than the fiance. She is closer with the fiance, which is what matters here.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 06:04 PM
0

That “rush” she is talking about is merely the difference between a person you are attracted to whom you have known for years and a person you are attracted to who is new and exciting.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 05:27 PM
75

Nah, I have actually seen this very often. The thing OP (and maybe you) don’t understand is the difference between admitting your husband is not literally the objectively most Chaddest 8 feet tall billionaire supermodel in existence and saying you are not attracted to him.
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 04:42 PM
5

Ok, so you know how words can mean different things in different contexts? Have you considered, whether the word “attractive”, in this context, might refer to more than just the subjective feeling of attraction? Yk, there’s this term “conventionally attractive”…
/r/PurplePillDebate03/03/22 04:27 PM
8

Why do you care? Unrealistic standards only become a problem when someone is being a dick about it and begins blaming others for their inability to find what they want. But if I just go about my day desiring an alien wizard prince bf with 3 dragons and a giant tentacle cock, who are you to judge?
/r/PurplePillDebate02/03/22 03:13 PM
1

How physically beautiful should a person be before the thing a person experiences as attraction becomes genuine?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 08:18 PM
1

I think if the attraction is delusional, it’s not really valid. What’s the difference between “genuine attraction” and “delusional attraction”? It’s brain chemicals either way, why does it matter where they come from?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 07:24 PM
1

It’s a very weak foundation.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 03:06 PM
1

Yes. But again not usually. Very rarely does a person' personality enhances his physical features to the point she is physically attracted to him. Disagree. For me it happens with about 1/4 of the people I would classify as unattractive at first glance. She doesn't have a choice of Millionaire supermodel and so chose you as a last resort. r/technicallythetruth. You could say the same about the obese 3/10 man with the obese 3/10 wife. The reason he is with her is undoubtedly because he would neve…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 03:05 PM
1

What do you base this belief on? Personal experiences? Evolutionary psychology?
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 08:09 AM
1

You have no foundation for that claim besides the fact that she was with a hotter dude when she herself was hotter and wouldn’t have dated someone who was not her looksmatch back then. And as I explained in my initial comment, that’s a terrible argument.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 07:59 AM
2

The SMV ages are actually broadly aligned if you take into account who is attracted to who. Sure, a 60 year old man will be more attractive than a 60 year old woman. But he will be more attractive to 60 year old women, not 20 year old women. For a 20 year old woman, the most attractive man is a ~23 year old. So a man’s ability to get with the most sexually attractive women (20 year olds), will peak at 23 on average. It all matches up.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 07:56 AM
2

I would date literally anyone with a vagina
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 07:49 AM
0

But not physically attractive. No, not necessarily. What you think of a person’s personality can greatly affect the way you perceive them physically. But clearly stating you wouldn't have swiped right on them, would have dated them only for personality or not objecting when her bf says you would have casual sex with basketball players but not with me is definitely the same as not finding him physically attractive. No, actually. It doesn’t mean that. Tinder and casual sex is a market flooded with…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/03/22 07:44 AM
1

I define settling as being with someone for material reasons and not being in-love with them. From where in this woman’s post do you extrapolate that she is not in love with her husband?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 08:51 PM
-1

If you find someone’s personality attractive, you still find them attractive. Finding basketball players more physically attractive is not the same as not finding other people attractive too.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 08:50 PM
0

You have absolutely zero idea what dual mating strategy means. If you define settling as “when you are with your looksmatch but probably wouldn’t have chosen that person if you could have tied down a hotter person instead”, literally all people are obviously settling. And you are still bold enough to sell this as some secret truth about female nature specifically. Would you try to argue that men aren’t like that? Would all the 4/10’s out there with 4/10 wives have chosen their 4/10 wife over any…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 08:43 PM
6

Why do you believe it’s so different for women than for men? If a man got the chance to get with Stacy, do you think he would lay one eye on the landwhale who would otherwise be his wife?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 08:24 PM
1

she clearly states she doesn't find him attractive Where does she state that?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 08:22 PM
-1

It shouldn’t be. This is a laughably terrible post. First of all, what this idiot is talking about is “settling”, a very simple concept that has nothing to do with dual mating strategy. But as we all know, complicated language = smart and correct. Secondly, we have absolutely zero reason to believe this woman settled for her husband. It is common, especially for women, to not be instantly attracted to someone they will later find very attractive. The woman in the post explicitly states that this…
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 08:17 PM
1

So you are basically saying it works like this?
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 07:13 PM
3

Why would a man, who according to you only values youth and sex, want to stay with woman 1 just because she was loyal? Out of obligation? I person wouldn’t be very happy in a relationship knowing my partner is only with me because he feels like he “owes” it to me. The 100k a year would be much nicer to have than a charity boyfriend.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 01:14 PM
1

Men are hardwired to find the vast majority of women attractive enough from a physical stand point. Women are hardwired to find only a small sliver of men attractive enough from a physical stand point. In other and much better words; men have a higher sex drive than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate28/02/22 12:54 PM
5

Well, I would be very surprised if a harmless libido killer drug doesn't exist somewhere out there, especially considering how often it's considered a side effect. As a second option, you can always try seeking out sex work, if that's possible or ethical where you live.
/r/ExRedPill27/02/22 07:05 PM
8

What do you seek in a relationship that is not possible as single? Sure, a relationship is nice, but it's just a companion in the routines you already have. A partner is a person you share life with, it does not make a life. > prefer the loner lifestyle over having to constantly socialize with others. It sounds like you aren't really missing out. What is a partner besides a person to socialize with constantly?
/r/ExRedPill27/02/22 05:54 PM
-1

Because why would she? She has an opportunity to cash $400, why wouldn’t she play into the outrage porn?
/r/AntiFeminists27/02/22 03:45 PM
4

The men with high n’s indulge in their impulses while the women with high n’s don’t even have that impulse to indulge in.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 07:39 PM
4

The idea that men have an impulse to be a slut while women don’t literally supports the opposite point of what you are trying to argue for.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 07:36 PM
8

Friends are not just about getting help with moving couches and giving you information you could find on google. Sometimes you just want to know that you are loved.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 07:25 PM
-1

o7
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 07:03 PM
11

it is up to women to control their n-counts The question is, why on earth would I want to control my n-count? To be blessed with the ability to tie down a fucking conservatoid or red piller? Horray horray.
/r/PurplePillDebate26/02/22 05:04 PM
-3

I am sympathetic to male incels too, yes.
/r/AntiFeminists26/02/22 08:14 AM
-4

Point still stands. These women have been hurt.
/r/AntiFeminists26/02/22 07:50 AM
-3

It works the other way around too. These women there have obviously been hurt, just like the incels. Look at these posts and tell me they don’t look like the average red pill advice post.
/r/AntiFeminists26/02/22 07:36 AM
1

I said I can be unhappy about situations and still want those situations. Yeah, but that’s not enough for a relationship if you want to not be a solid piece of shit. I didn't compare a relationship to a job. You explicitly did. Do you honestly think someone in a healthy relationship is always happy You don’t have to be “always happy” to be overall happy. You may be unhappy with your girlfriend forgetting to put the milk back in the fridge, but you are not meant to be unhappy with the relationshi…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 08:27 PM
1

I am not sure what one would consider an almost-millionaire. But if we go with the standard “6 figure” standard instead, it’s like 45%. And no, we don’t need to sort out the men who aren’t single. If only 1% of 35 year old men are rich enough to be more attractive to women than when they were 25, would you really see that as a compelling argument in favor of the assertion that men, in general, will get more attractive to young women as they age?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 07:52 PM
1

This is a bit like if you posted a thread claiming people don't really like ferraris, because more people drive camrys. What people actually drive isn't necessarily relevant to what they like. The implicit argument in this comparison is that women aren’t dating older men because they aren’t able to; an extremely fucking delusional assertion. It has been proven time and time again that men of all ages are most attracted to women in their early 20’s, giving women in their early 20’s an unimaginabl…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 05:14 PM
0

Yes, the incels. Since when does their perception matter? They also say a lot of things about women, everyone discredits them for their opinion instantly. Well, even if you think incels’ opinions don’t matter, this post is still clearly directed at them.
/r/AntiFeminists25/02/22 05:09 PM
-2

She is not saying sexual harassment by women is good, she is saying that some men think sexual harassment by women is good. Which is unfortunately the case. I have spent a lot of time debating gender issues, and I have met a surprisingly big number of men who have tried to mock women’s fear of cat calling by saying that they wouldn’t take issue if a woman told them they were hot on the street, or something similar.
/r/AntiFeminists25/02/22 04:09 PM
-2

The thing is, many do imagine such a scenario. Maybe not you and the other people on this subreddit specifically, but many people do. I have seen so many comics and comments from conservatives trying to mock women for their fear of being catcalled by reversing the situation in a “oooh noooo, a woman said I looked hot, how will I ever recover” style. These disgusting comments are what this post is a rebuttal to.
/r/AntiFeminists25/02/22 04:02 PM
2

K.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 03:54 PM
1

Probably. I can’t imagine being anything but a girl now, as that has been a part of my identity all my life, but if I was born all over, yeah I would. I would have been happier.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 03:39 PM
1

Well, if that’s where you are getting your validation from…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 03:28 PM
1

This is a bit like if you posted a thread claiming people don't really like ferraris, because more people drive camrys. What people actually drive isn't necessarily relevant to what they like. The implicit argument in this comparison is that women aren’t dating older men because they aren’t able to; an extremely fucking delusional assertion. It has been proven time and time again that men of all ages are most attracted to women in their early 20’s, giving women in their early 20’s an unimaginabl…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 03:25 PM
2

You will end up having 15 old af men for every 1 young woman willing to date them. Good luck.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 03:03 PM
1

I never said any of that BS. You essentially did. How else do you want me to interpret a comparison between a romantic relationship and a job you don’t want to do?
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 02:38 PM
1

That was an example of being unhappy in a situation you still want... Simply wanting a relationship is not enough, dude. “Having this ugly landwhale I feel nothing for as a girlfriend is better than not having sex, I guess”. Do you really believe this is an acceptable mindset to have in a romantic relationship? Do you truly believe this is morally ok to do to another person? And remove the truthpilled cos it's only your opinion Nah, I am being objectively correct when I say that the vast majorit…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 07:29 AM
1

People settle... No dude. I am pretty sure seeing a relationship as a boring job you have to do is a you problem.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 07:02 AM
2

That is literally the definition of settling. I am getting a stronger and stronger feeling that all of this worrying about settling is nothing but projection.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/02/22 06:51 AM
2

If you wouldn't be unhappy with being with the person you love and care for instead of sligtly hotter randos, why would women be?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 09:39 PM
2

Settle, huh?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 09:30 PM
3

You are picking apart my wording a bit too much here. > Just be careful with having a worldview that includes concepts like, "he comes along" It's just a different term for "meet". > "perfect in every way" It was hyperbole meant to illustrate how some women's rules are not meant to be taken too literally.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 09:02 PM
3

Yep. I will freely admit that I have done that too; infatuation with one person do sometimes be influencing what you find attractive in other people. But guess what, it goes away instantly when you fall for the next person. Isn't this exactly where the phrase "Women make rules for betas and break them for Alphas" comes from? Women make a lot of weird rules, but they are very quick to break them when the right man comes along who is perfect in every way except his favorite season is fall.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 08:36 PM
2

> Because women are hypergamous though, they really do set their "standard" against the hottest man who fucks them. They calibrate their expectations to that, and if she's "settling" for you, there's a real danger she's an alpha widow. What do you base this on?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 05:57 PM
6

If casual sex with Stacy was an option, would you leave the girl you claim to love for that?
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 05:54 PM
-6

And y'all say feminists don't have humor BAHAHAHAHA.
/r/AntiFeminists24/02/22 05:05 PM
2

No they don't. True. Your boyfriend not literally being the number one most objectively beautiful person out of all 4 billlion men in the world is not the same as settling. If that's the case, men are settling just as much as women. The vast majority of women (who chose their boyfriends and husbands voluntarily) do genuinely like and love their partners. Brain chemicals are magic. An emotional connection might actually make you the number one most attractive person in her eyes. > Now why wouldn'…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/02/22 02:40 PM
1

The comment I replied to made the claim that this woman had gender dysphoria. I’m merely working by that assumption.
/r/PurplePillDebate23/02/22 04:06 PM
4

Correct stuff: Women are, indeed, more attracted to attractive men than unattractive men. Some people do, indeed, have more sex than other people. Bullshit: The belief that the above points are somehow an impressive discovery lmao. The rage filled knee jerk reaction that makes up the remaining 80% of TRP. (Feeemales are literally soulless robots programmed to brutally exploit and torture you for fun, and they are literally living in your walls).
/r/PurplePillDebate22/02/22 07:01 PM
3

Handing people cups does not harm men. Not giving mothers custody does.
/r/MensRights22/02/22 06:09 PM
1

I have already debunked the underlying logic of your first argument. Please tell me what else I did wrong so I can respond to that too.
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 03:59 PM
1

Lol, you just can’t admit that you have a problem with how you see men, can you. No, because I do not. The underlying problem with your caricature is that you do believe that is how men are. That’s an assumption you have about me purely based on the fact that I am a feminist, not because of anything I said. Because, as we have established, there is nothing inherently problematic about mocking misogynists.
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 03:38 PM
1

I made a caricature of people who engage in a specific kind of misogyny. Not men as a whole. “Lololol I like to murder people because I enjoy causing other people suffering” is a caricature of a murderer. Since the vast majority of murderers are men, would this caricature of a murderer be misandrist?
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 01:55 PM
1

Lol, this is getting fun. Murder is bad because you’re taking a life of another human being duh. Yikes sweaty, this isn’t a good look. You are currently reinforcing a very harmful stereotype about men by stigmatizing the behavior that they disproportionately engage in. ✨💋 Calling out problematic behavior, is something I’m more then down with. Why tf would you then have a problem with me saying it’s problematic to dehumanize women?
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 01:28 PM
1

Lmao. So what you are essentially saying is that it’s misandrist to criticize bad behavior if said behavior is primarily perpetrated by men. By that logic, is it racist to say murder is bad because murder is primarily done by non-white people? Is it misogynist to say that infanticide is bad because it’s primarily done by women?
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 10:34 AM
1

That’s not a caricature of men. That’s a caricature of a specific subset of misogynists.
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 08:42 AM
1

Where is the caricature of men? What’s the point of making arguments if you don’t want me to understand your arguments?
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 08:26 AM
2

No, I am just not sure what you mean. Where’s the caricature of men?
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 08:15 AM
2

What exactly do you take issue with?
/r/AntiFeminists20/02/22 08:08 AM
0

That’s nice.
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 08:54 PM
3

Lol.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/22 08:17 PM
1

Feel free to say males and females when talking about biological differences in an academic context. The problem is “I met a female with huge badonkers at the park today. Also, I met a man.”
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 08:15 PM
1

Some combination of XX chromosomes, female genitalia, and female hormones.
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 08:09 PM
-3

Well, it’s a very complicated subject; you can try seeing gender as a big clusterfuck of characteristics that in the vast majority of cases align, but sometimes has outliers. The thing is, most definitions work like this anyway. Even if you were to define the word “woman” purely based on biology, you would eventually have to face the annoying edge cases. The easy shortcut to a clear cut definition is to rely purely on self identification, as that’s what brings everyone the most happiness anyway.…
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 08:06 PM
2

What?
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 05:56 PM
-13

First and foremost it’s about being called feminine words, like “she”, “mrs”, “daughter”, “mother”, it’s about looking like a woman; boobs, hips, long hair, feminine clothing, and it’s about the gendered expectations, I.e. gender roles you are subjugated to.
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 05:56 PM
2

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2009/06/090626153511.htm
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/22 03:38 PM
-23

But they will never be a woman genenitcly. There’s no such thing as being a woman genetically. You can be female genetically, but the word “woman” describes a social role, per definition.
/r/AntiFeminists19/02/22 03:31 PM
1

Yeah, they are superior to men without abs. That doesn’t make them superior to the female gender.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/02/22 07:14 AM
-2

Jfc this comment section is worse than usual. “NOOOOOO settling is perfectly fine and healthy, look at me, I barely tolerate my wife, but I am still happy with our marriage because having any woman around I can cum in is slightly better than jerking it to porn!!” OP’s opinion is 100% inarguably correct.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/02/22 10:33 AM
1

hypocritical BS How on earth is it hypocritical? A casual relationship and a long term relationship are two different games with very different rules. A person’s values matter if you plan to spend the rest of your life with them, they do not matter if you just want to boink and never see them again thereafter. Withholding sex is a vetting process that selects for certain values. Saying it’s hypocritical to only select for values when you want a romantic relationship with a person is like saying …
/r/PurplePillDebate17/02/22 08:47 PM
1

It is misandrist. What is misandrist? Quantitative data? Enough with this fake authoritarianism and censoring. What on earth are you referring to? Reddit mods banning people? Take that up with the admins, I didn’t design Reddit this way. We've been seeing the proof. Mhmm. Does this “proof” go to another school? We have no need to prove things to a single Reddit user that chooses to be in denial. Ok, but why respond to me then?
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 02:13 PM
1

Y’know, you could have just mentioned the word “article” somewhere in your replies and I could have easily understood you. Have you heard about this very useful concept called “quantitative data”? It is something a random news article about a single rape case is not.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 02:03 PM
1

What double standards do I support?
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 01:50 PM
1

I’m lost because you can’t speak English.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 01:49 PM
1

More than one what?
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 01:26 PM
1

I love you.
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 08:03 AM
1

Wut?
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 07:40 AM
1

Ok cool. Does that mean I can claim that men who masturbate are inherently disgusting trash “due to their psychological nature” and then leave without elaborating?
/r/AntiFeminists17/02/22 07:38 AM
1

Well, I would count myself as having a social win if a girl actually respects me. You said you would be a loser if your girl waited for sex with you but didn’t wait when she had casual sex. This implies that having different standards for different relationships is inherently disrespectful to you.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 08:38 PM
1

And women are inherently disrespecting you if they aren’t having sex with you early enough?
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 05:58 PM
2

K.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 05:14 PM
2

There’s also this new revolutionary concept called “leaving the relationship if the two if you are incompatible”.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 03:37 PM
-5

1,5%. 1,5% of the female British population experienced sexual assault in the past year, meaning you have a 98,5% chance of making it through one year without being sexually assaulted. Wow, good odds, huh? Well, I don’t know about you, but I would personally prefer living through more than one year without being assaulted. So let’s see what happens if we say 0,985<sup>43,</sup> shall we? 0,52. 52% of British women make it through their lives without being assaulted by a stranger. 48% doesn’t. 48…
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 03:10 PM
2

according to who? Me. Due to the psychological nature of Men and Women. We are different. That’s very vague, dude. Do you have evidence for the claim that a woman is inherently a bitch if she is non-monogamous?
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 01:49 PM
1

Nope, that kind of rap makes me uncomfortable for this very reason, plus I almost exclusively listen to rock. But even if I did, this is a very weak gotcha. You can enjoy things while still recognizing the problematic parts of it.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 01:45 PM
2

They are similar enough that it’s wrong to categorically treat their actions differently. It’s a bell curve. It’s possible for a man and a woman to have the exact same traits, and treating those two people differently based on their perceived gender is highly illogical. Also, can you tell me what specific sex difference makes ENM different for men than for women?
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 01:22 PM
-2

‘Cause obvious double standards.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 12:40 PM
-4

Least sexist user of r/antifeminists.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 12:37 PM
4

"Patriarchy" does not describe a society where men have more rights than women, it is a society where men have more power than women.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 08:08 AM
9

> Being desired by virtually all men once you turn 18 LMAOOO WE FUCKING WISH IT STARTED BY 18 😭😭😭
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 08:04 AM
1

The question is if he would. I dont really care about your personal opinion here.
/r/PurplePillDebate16/02/22 07:30 AM
-1

Wheres the lie?
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 07:27 AM
-5

Well, right wingers are famously the ones always being creepily invested in other peoples sex lives.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 07:25 AM
-4

So, when a man has two girlfriends he is a gigachad, when a woman has two boyfriends she is a cheating bitch. 🥴
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 07:22 AM
1

How do you know he is not happy? This is almost definitely some kink thing.
/r/AntiFeminists16/02/22 07:20 AM
2

Well, muscles are hot. But they are useless in the context of making you "superior".
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 08:42 PM
1

What would you count as a "social win" and why?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 07:45 PM
2

So if a childless slut wanted to settle down and start a family with you in her thirties, that would make you the winner then, right?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 05:58 PM
-4

Lmao, you linked one article. I do disagree with those kinds of mod practices (All Reddit Mods Are Bastards), but I wouldn't call it misandrist to ban an obvious anti-feminist from a feminist subreddit.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 05:43 PM
8

Physical strength mean almost nothing in this day and age. Muscles are useless when people got weapons.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 05:29 PM
0

#MalenessIsAMentalIllness Seriously though, I do think we should do more about the male suicide rate, and yes, society is completely failing men. I think the main problem and reason why we haven't done the same for men's suicide rate is that the issue is a lot more complicated to advocate for, because the causes are more complicated. "Toxic masculinity" is a more abstract concept than "Don't fucking disown your 13 year old trans son you absolute moron". But yes, I do agree.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 04:19 PM
-2

You have not responded to my counterargument.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 03:02 PM
-2

> https://convertcase.net Very funny. > not one they made up. And why is that? As we have already established, your first argument was utter bullshit, so let me hear your true rationale for being in favor of restricting people's personal freedoms.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 02:04 PM
1

Cis woman: *experiences gender dysphoria from not being seen as the gender she identifies as* You: THiS IS PROoF tHAT RESPEcTING PEOPLE's GENDER INDENtITY Is HARMFUL
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 12:19 PM
1

So far the opposing side has linked no evidence at all lmao.
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 11:07 AM
-8

Do not trust when random Redditors tell you why they got banned from a subreddit. First of all, nothing is stopping them from lying or leaving out context when reporting on their own behavior. Second of all, they won't even know themselves why they got banned unless the human mods directly told them in the ban message. If you just got a ban with no message, you won't be able to know if you got banned by a misandrist or just an automod that automatically bans people who participate in certain sub…
/r/AntiFeminists15/02/22 11:02 AM
5

Is she the objectively best looking woman in the world?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 10:32 AM
3

Have you ever had a girlfriend? Was she the objectively number one best looking woman you had ever laid your eyes on?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 09:56 AM
1

You should tell him you find other guys hotter than him That’s not what she said. She said she has had the opportunity to be with men who are objectively better looking, not someone she personally found more attractive.
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 08:26 AM
1

If a man could have easily dated 3 other hotter women he knew when he met his wife, she probably wouldn't be his wife in the first place. That’s not the scenario we are talking about. A man has an average wife he supposedly love for 2 years. Then he meets a prettier woman who’s interested in him. He doesn’t know anything about her, besides that she’s pretty. Would an average man leave his wife for this woman?
/r/PurplePillDebate15/02/22 07:59 AM
1

I'm sorry I don't understand the question. My question is whether you have considered the reasons why a woman might use this strategy. We know that the men women spread their legs for are the winners here, In what way do you think they are the winners? Is it because they get to “pay less” for sex, or is it because you believe their sex partners are more attracted to them?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/22 08:02 PM
4

This fantasy that men are a bunch of cheating scumbags who will leave their wife for a slightly more attractive woman is bullshit. Women are far more likely to be able to cheat out of their league. A 7 woman can easily have casual sex with 8, 9, 10 men. The reverse isn't true. Basically what you’re saying is “men wouldn’t leave their wife for a prettier woman because they don’t have the opportunity to”. I agree with you, but this is a terrible argument and won’t convince OP.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/22 05:33 PM
1

What if a woman was to withhold sex because she wants to avoid the men who see not having sex with him as insulting? Have you considered that possibility?
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/22 05:25 PM
6

A combination of insecurity and a cultural fetishization of female innocence and inferiority.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/02/22 05:21 PM
8

“Knowledgeable about her European roots”. 🤨
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 04:03 PM
1

Bro, you are trying to fit way too much crap into one concept. As I see it, there are two very different statements in your post that have nothing to do with each other: “Men generally want as many women as they can get, while women generally want the one best man they can get”. “Women are only attracted to men she deems superior to herself”. I overall agree with the first one, at least as long as we are talking about casual sex. It could basically be summed up in the simple statement “men horni…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/02/22 03:47 PM
2

This IS sexist against women. Women are being called “superior” here in the same way crazy dog people call dogs superior to humans, or a racist white liberal would call indigenous culture superior to their own after a trip to a dirt poor third world country. This is infantilizing, not empowering. You more than have the right to feel insulted by being called inferior by this hyperbolic idiot, but I would argue that women do too.
/r/AntiFeminists13/02/22 07:27 AM
11

You’d be called a sexist for posting this too. Just look at the comments under that post.
/r/AntiFeminists12/02/22 05:57 PM
2

People have the right to have all the crazy standards they want. Who you want to fuck is nobody’s business but your own. I will only ever have a problem if you are being a dick about it.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/22 05:39 PM
0

Do good things, don’t do bad things.
/r/PurplePillDebate12/02/22 02:49 PM
0

Do you have a logical reason to believe this to be the case? Would you be less happy with your girlfriend if you had unlimited access to Stacy prostitutes, or is it a fear that women work differently?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 09:40 PM
0

love doesn’t exist I’ll leave it up to you to define the word “exist”, but it exists just as much as lust or anger. and that women do absolutely compare there partners with exes? Obviously. And she compares them with people she hasn’t slept with too. What I initially argued against was the framing that women are thinking of their partners as “not first place” because of these comparisons. This is not the case.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 08:48 PM
1

A girl would want to be someone else’s girlfriend Not if she already has a boyfriend she loves.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 08:32 PM
0

It’s just a dumb chemical tbh lolz. Everything is. Your entire brain is just a bunch of dumb chemicals lolz. You don’t exist. It’s all an illusion. 🌀🌀🌀 Comparison is just a thing people do, wether or not you like it, everyone does it. True true. I might compare the physical appearance of a crush to other guys around me and come to the conclusion that he is objectively kinda ugly. Or I might look at my parents and think that they aren’t literally, objectively the best parents in the world. But th…
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 08:25 PM
-1

Explain.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 07:43 PM
-2

Oxytocin doesn’t exist? Also she’d be doing those things subconsciously, not actively. Do you have any logical reason to believe this to be the case, or is it just a feeling or fear you have?
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 07:42 PM
1

something that requires nuance. How does it require nuance? The meaning of words is just a democratic decision. Post the poll in this subreddit and I might concede that you have point. Lmao. This subreddit is far, far, far, far less representative of the wider population than the normie subs.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 07:29 PM
-1

Ffs dude. When you are in love with someone, you are not measuring their facial symmetry and comparing their every birthmark with Chad from 7 years ago. That’s not how humans work. That’s not how love chemicals work. This is like a child not wanting her mother to meet her classmates because it would make it statistically unlikely that she would stay as the best, most beautiful, most talented girl the mother has ever seen in her life.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 06:48 PM
1

Well, feel free to link counter evidence. Until you do, I am winning, as my Reddit poll ranks higher than your mere opinion in the hierarchy of evidence.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 04:41 PM
1

https://www.reddit.com/r/polls/comments/sp5afs/when_someone_describes_themselves_as_lonely_what/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 03:29 PM
1

Ah yes, 200 women, very romantic.
/r/PurplePillDebate11/02/22 03:18 PM
1

Just don’t be a dick about it and you are fine.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/22 08:50 PM
1

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loneliness
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/22 07:49 PM
1

"Loneliness" is distinctly the feeling of lacking a flock you can trust to protect you. It is a specific biological urge we evolved because humans are fucked on their own. The need for a romantic or sexual partner serve a very, very different function than the need for allies, and using the same word for these two vastly different feelings will just make it more difficult for people to properly communicate their emotions and identify their problems.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/22 06:11 PM
0

If you really want a term for it, I have nothing against calling it “romantic loneliness”. But don’t just call it “loneliness”. That’s obfuscating our language and creating unnecessary misunderstandings.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/22 11:16 AM
1

You can be intimate with your friends. If the kind of intimacy you crave can only be fulfilled by people you are attracted to, your needs are romantic or sexual. Not social. The need for connections with other people is the biological need for a flock who can protect you against wild animals and shit. Friends and family can do that.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/22 11:05 AM
1

Well, getting a partner can be one way to escape loneliness. But if your “loneliness” can only and exclusively be cured by someone you are sexually attracted to, the need is sexual, not social.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/22 08:40 AM
0

Lack of pussy is not loneliness. That’s just not what “loneliness” means. Call it horny, call it an unfulfilled desire for romance, but there’s no reason to call it “loneliness”, of all words. All it will do is create unnecessary misunderstandings between you and normal people who acknowledge the dictionary definition.
/r/PurplePillDebate10/02/22 06:19 AM
-2

It's great but it doesn't help against loneliness Genuine human interaction and connection doesn’t help against loneliness? 🤨
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/22 07:59 PM
0

Otherwise we might have to go ahead and keep that carrot on the stick No.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/22 06:31 PM
3

Why would a woman want a relationship with a man whose idea of “A-game” is when you can get out of having to interact with a woman outside of sex?
/r/PurplePillDebate09/02/22 07:16 AM
0

> Well, your assumption was wrong. I doubt that. > Moreover, did I generalize all women or did I literally say "based on my experience?" Great, so you agree with me that your personal experiences do not align with the nature of all women?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/22 06:18 PM
0

Do you believe sex is the only reason people have romantic relationships?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/22 05:44 PM
-1

How tf am I insulting you? My point is merely that it’s irrational of you to generalise the behaviour of 4 billion people based on what I assume is a single digit number of women.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/22 12:40 PM
1

Is it any better to know that your partner has almost no dating options? “Yeah, you happened to be the first person to respond to me on Tinder, you’re my girlfriend now I guess.”
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/22 10:37 AM
1

based on my experience Your experience has a sample size of what? 4?
/r/PurplePillDebate08/02/22 10:33 AM
6

What is it with red pill men and labeling every single fucking thing as either sickly repulsive or outright a turn on. Where's the "neutral" category? Is it really impossible for you imagine a man who would be indifferent to his partner's promiscuity?
/r/PurplePillDebate07/02/22 01:44 PM
1

Ok, so sorry for posting this full essay in an ancient thread, but I just felt like dumping my thoughts. In my experience, as a girl, there’s a lot of truth to the old notions that Women are, on average, less horny than men, and Women are, on average, less visual than men. As for the first point, look up the Tinder gender ratio if you haven’t already. That monstrosity of a statistic can of course partly be explained by social factors like slut shaming, women’s safety concerns, toxic masculinity,…
/r/ExRedPill06/02/22 09:08 PM
1

But that's like saying "its not in our nature to believe in God." It wasn’t me who made the argument that humans’ value is based on our nature. But that doesn't dismiss the fact that the fetus is still a human being. It's still as valuable as a born human being. The difference between a born and unborn human is the perception of both. But you could say the exact same thing about the lion and the dog in the other hypotheticals.
/r/AntiFeminists06/02/22 08:01 PM
1

It is indeed human nature to sympathise with other human-looking beings. But the thing is, it’s not in our nature to sympathise with a fetus that looks like pudding just because its dna says it’s human, so I wouldn’t use that argument for why fetuses should have the same rights as a born person. You could use the same hypothetical as before; if you were to kill either a 5 year old child or a fetus, everyone would choose to save the 5 year old child.
/r/AntiFeminists06/02/22 07:14 PM
-1

How is it mental gymnastics then?
/r/AntiFeminists06/02/22 06:59 PM
-4

Ok, good week. But do you deny that there’s a difference in what happens in the brain when a straight man watch a woman get railed, versus what happens when a straight woman watch another woman get railed?
/r/AntiFeminists06/02/22 06:57 PM
-5

No, they are not objectifying the women. When women watch porn, they are typically identifying with the women in the scenes.
/r/AntiFeminists06/02/22 06:53 PM
-22

You barely ever even see the man in porn videos, lmao. Please tell me about how the minority of the women who even watch porn objectify the 7 pixels of dick in the corner of their screens.
/r/AntiFeminists06/02/22 12:03 PM
1

Yeah. And plants are plants. I am fine with killing both.
/r/AntiFeminists06/02/22 07:40 AM
1

I would definitely kill the animal. But not because a human is inherently worth more than an animal. Killing the kid would hurt the mother, while killing the animal would not affect anyone. Human beings, including me, emotionally prioritise our own species over animals. So in a situation like that, I would probably feel better about killing the animal rather than a child. But that’s not because the child is inherently worth more than the animal, that’s just because our brains are programmed to e…
/r/AntiFeminists06/02/22 07:38 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter