TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

HyperComa Archive

View 1 post and 31 comments by HyperComa on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
-9

"possible that after grabbing her, they exchanged glances or body language sufficient to establish that she was OK with him proceeding to a kiss?" Sooo... mini-Stockholm syndrome makes it okay? Lack of complaint or lack of knowledge about what constitutes assault makes the act just dandy? Her actions after do not negate the fact that he forced a kiss on her.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 03:34 PM
7

I don't know. I for one don't believe that kissing a stranger without their consent, even in celebration, is cool by any standard. I would call it sexual assault if she had grasped him and kissed him 100 years ago, 20 seconds ago, 3000 years ago, etc... Invading someone's personal space and forcing physical contact is shitty, no matter how you slice it.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 03:22 PM
2

'I have not seen him approaching, and before I understand what is happening, I found myself gripped in a vice. You caught me. This man was very strong. I kissed it, it was he who kissed me.’ The woman herself said that she was assaulted. Being forcibly kissed by a stranger of any gender in any situation is an invasion of personal autonomy. The support or derision of other parties is not necessary to change the facts.
/r/MensRights07/10/14 03:19 PM
2

As a woman, I can say that I don't personally have a thin skin, am not a child, and certainly don't want my feelings protected. And that seems to be the case with most of the women I know. However, I tend to keep better company, so I can imagine that your statement may be true for some. And I get what you're saying - a lot of laws and policies aren't meant to protect people in general, but those who whine the loudest. I wouldn't go so far as to call it a terror campaign. More like a "stop the wh…
/r/MensRights30/01/14 05:22 AM
3

In practice, it's actually women who are taken most seriously when they lodge sexual harassment complaints and not having language that specifically protects men as well makes it harder for men to have their complaints seen as legitimate. I see this more as a reminder to old guard male supervisors that they have an obligation to take ALL sexual harassment complaints seriously and not chalk up female-on-male violations as just the male complainant being a "pussy" or the female just being a "take-…
/r/MensRights30/01/14 04:05 AM
1

It what way did I indicate that this was "funny or trivial"?
/r/MensRights12/10/12 10:00 PM
4

For those of us who are introverted (but not shy), texting is a fantastic means of communication. Like so many others have said, I detest talking on the phone and would much rather communicate in person. Texting/IMing is second to that. Being introverted and reserved isn't something that needs to be "fixed". Just because someone loathes your "normal" doesn't mean that their normal is a bad thing.
/r/MensRights22/09/12 01:43 PM
1

If her story matches yours, then I would say that you didn't do anything rapey. However, depending on where you live, you may have committed adultery and/or sodomy. In the state of Virginia (where I live), any sex between unmarried persons is adultery, even if neither are married to other people. Also, in some areas/counties, any position other than missionary with vaginal penetration is sodomy, including oral. Luckily, these antiquated laws are rarely, if ever, prosecuted. I hope...
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:17 AM
9

If your goal is to get her to feel guilt for a decision she made years ago, move along and accept that will likely not happen. However, if you want her to understand that circumcision is but one of many atrocities commited against males simply due to their gender, then you can take some time educating her in a non-confrontation fashion when the subject comes up on its own. As has been mentioned elsewhere in this thread, her generation likely didn't give the subject much thought and she probably …
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:07 AM
1

Her current job is strictly phone-oriented and not in the beauty/health/spa field. As I stated somewhere up-thread, I will be reporting her to the state licensing agency before she gets her next job. Personally, I fear for her clients, no matter what their gender and orientation. Assaulting someone for an involuntary reaction is fucked. Period.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 10:05 PM
2

I stand corrected. I should have written "is sometimes". I think we can agree that it can occasionally be the case.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 10:02 PM
2

I know she's already looking for spa work in this area. I'll file a complaint with whoever regulates aesthetician licenses here. Her current position doesn't allow for contact with our customers (strictly phone), so there's that little bonus. While I don't want to see her (or anyone) unemployed, I sure as fuck don't want her touching people until she's got her head straight about right vs. wrong!
/r/MensRights27/08/12 10:00 PM
1

So very sad to hear that on all counts. In some cases, it's easy to chalk it up to plain old ignorance. You inform a person, maybe they rethink their stance, and the world is a better place. Then there are those who willfully choose that path, despite all the contrary evidence. These are the people who scare me.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 09:55 PM
1

So sorry to disappoint you, but I'm not trolling.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 09:50 PM
2

Sadly, the four folks who overheard made a point of pretending not to hear the convo (even though it was obviously not appropriate to the environment we work in). We're both receptionists for a large company and were being interrupted by incoming calls, so the discussion ended right there. If any of them said anything to her while I wasn't around, I'm unaware. Edited for clarification
/r/MensRights27/08/12 09:49 PM
12

She didn't give him time to say a thing. Sadly, she's been in a monogamous relationship with the same dude for 5+ years. I'd hate to think what his home life is like.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 12:21 AM
22

Just a little bit. She recently had her license transferred here. I sincerely hope my comments to her sunk in. I'd hate to think she'd do that again!
/r/MensRights27/08/12 12:19 AM
9

Wait... I think that's called a Violet Wand or a Tens Unit...
/r/MensRights27/08/12 12:16 AM
25

Meh. I'm not worried. I'm pretty sure she knows I'm right and is highly embarrassed, especially since there were several other people in the room at the time. While I do think she can be pretty immature at times, she's not stupid and I think she's a little scared of me.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 10:44 PM
2

How long until TLC or MTV try to wrangle these guys into a "reality" show with a sexy, blonde, female roommate...?
/r/MensRights06/08/12 10:11 AM
2

I'm from a mid-Atlantic state that is sometimes considered southeast, but could also be see as northeast, depending on the prevailing political climate. This poll is kinda sloppy all the way around.
/r/MensRights06/08/12 10:02 AM
1

Without the women's side, we have no idea if they were disturbed or hurt by "da boiz" behavior. We have only the OP's story which, IMO, isn't enough to exonerate him or vilify the other people who shared the cabin. In any case, you're correct that assault, whether with objects or drinks, is uncalled for. If they found the guys to be that objectionable, they could have asked them nicely to tone it down or asked to switch cabins. I still hold by my statement that this doesn't seem to be a case of …
/r/MensRights31/07/12 11:05 PM
-3

Perhaps the women just thought you were obnoxious...? Because to me this sounds less like women trying to prevent male bonding and more like your cabin mates being totally over the juvenile party-strong atmosphere.
/r/MensRights31/07/12 10:03 AM
2

This x a bajillionty
/r/MensRights29/07/12 06:00 AM
6

Sounds to me like the question isn't really about gender at all. Clearly, this woman was not ready to assume the responsibility of management. I've seen supervisors of both genders be this wishy-washy. Why did the advice-seeker have to make it a gender-based question...?
/r/MensRights22/07/12 09:03 PM
1

Long skirt + long johns + boots = TOASTY
/r/MensRights19/07/12 11:27 PM
1

Try www.sportkilt.com . They're considerably cheaper, but don't have all the bells and whistles of Utilikilts. Still nice, though.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 11:24 PM
1

Kilts are all one length (they should just touch the ground when the wearer is kneeling). Skirts can be any length.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 11:22 PM
13

The guys in my office are required to wear ties every freaking day. Meanwhile, half the women are in cute little sundresses and flip-flops.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 11:14 PM
9

My SO wears skirts all the time and I LOVE him in them! His are all ankle length and plain black. Very sexy with his t-shirts and combat boots. He won't wear kilts, though, because he doesn't like showing off his knees. He also wears sarongs when the mood strikes. Strictly about comfort for him and not a "statement" about anything at all. he just likes his junk to swing free. A few months ago, he decided to say "fuck it" and wear a skirt to work. To say it was well-received would be an understat…
/r/MensRights19/07/12 11:13 PM
22

Crap like this makes me sad to be a woman.
/r/MensRights19/07/12 10:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter