TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Hypersapien Archive

View 10 posts and 1,446 comments by Hypersapien on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,446 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Wait, what did Bruce Springsteen do?
/r/MensRights09/11/16 02:02 AM
2

That's the thing about laws. They can be changed and re-interpreted if enough people scream for it.
/r/MensRights06/11/16 06:09 PM
3

In any other country in the industrialized world, people like Obama and Hillary Clinton would be considered moderate conservatives, and Bernie Sanders would be considered a mainstream liberal. It's only in the US, where the Republicans have managed to drag the entire political landscape to the right over the past 30-40 years, that the Democratic leadership looks like moderate liberals, and Bernie is considered a far-left extremist. Not to mention that she's a warhawk who serves large corporation…
/r/MensRights03/11/16 08:25 PM
9

Right. I'm sexist for not voting for Hillary, even though I'm voting for Jill Stein. Fuck you, Barack. I am so fucking sick of assholes like you who insist that no reasonable person could possibly have a problem with Hillary's politics and character. That the only possible reason for not voting for her is sexism. The main reason I'm not voting for Hillary is the same reason I didn't vote for you in 2012. I don't vote for Republicans.
/r/MensRights03/11/16 02:16 PM
3

This is probably satire
/r/MensRights28/10/16 06:19 PM
2

Which shows that frogs are smarter than humans
/r/MensRights27/10/16 07:55 PM
1

Which is not representative of the US as a whole. I'm sorry, but you live in a shithole.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 04:58 PM
1

Do not act as your own attorney. Ever. Unless you're actually an attorney. No. Don't do it even if you are an attorney.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 04:13 PM
17

How many times do cops go to work and get shot at? It happens, but I don't believe it's a common occurance. This nation's disrespect towards police officers is disgusting. They can easily fix that by having more respect for the public, and firing the cops that refuse to.
/r/MensRights26/10/16 02:52 AM
1

Or, they came forward months ago, and the DNC/media has been holding them in reserve until now.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 01:24 PM
1

I'm just saying look at the needs themselves rather than using sex as an indicator for those needs. Yeah, each sex will fall largely on one side of the line or the other, but I would like to see us minimizing (or eliminating as much as possible) the cases where outlier kids fall between the cracks and are lumped into places they shouldn't be.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 04:48 PM
6

How about we just ignore boy vs girl and just look at competitive vs non-competitive.
/r/MensRights10/10/16 03:43 PM
2

So do they keep a lookout for boys who aren't naturally competitive, and move them to a learning environment that's more appropriate for their temperament? And what about girls who are naturally competitive?
/r/MensRights10/10/16 02:50 PM
0

The point is that people who fight against men's rights wouldn't touch a case like this because the men here are Muslim. You will never hear radical feminists say one bad word against the injustices and atrocities that women face in the middle east, because they've decided that doing so would be racist.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 07:31 PM
24

It should be the ones who are complaining about the seating that move, no matter how many there are.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 07:11 PM
1

It's more about the hypocrisy of those fighting against men's rights.
/r/MensRights05/10/16 07:10 PM
1

The horses aren't supposed to represent an individual man and woman, but the aggregate of all men and women.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 05:31 PM
2

Mandatory minimum sentences fall under the category of "court stripping laws".
/r/MensRights03/10/16 01:50 PM
3

I'm an atheist. Trump isn't the antichrist, he's just a tantrum-prone moron.
/r/MensRights28/09/16 12:27 AM
3

See, I don't agree. I think that although Hillary is terrible, Trump is far worse. Trump is far more likely to trigger a nuclear war.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 11:14 PM
1

Go back to RedPill or PUA or wherever the hell it is that you came from.
/r/MensRights27/09/16 03:05 PM
9

"couldn't" care less
/r/MensRights27/09/16 03:04 PM
5

And how does she know what the men's experience is like?
/r/MensRights27/09/16 03:03 PM
2

Then the problems will never end. It becomes just two opposing, yet equivalent sides, each not listening to the other and neither of them trying to make the world a better place for everyone.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 07:02 PM
0

It doesn't. It makes us not like them.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 05:30 PM
1

I'm saying we shouldn't be doing that.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 05:25 PM
17

One of the biggest problems we have is when feminists take non-gendered issues and focus only on how they affect women. Let's not start acting the same way.
/r/MensRights23/09/16 12:15 PM
3

It can, but it never does when calling a person by that name.
/r/MensRights20/09/16 05:30 PM
20

He was warned by other actors who were concerned for him, not by activists.
/r/MensRights18/09/16 04:25 PM
2

Personally, I'm voting for Jill Stein. I know she has some problems, like being anti-nuclear energy, but she's still way better than anyone else. I'm perfectly aware that she has no chance of winning. I'm voting for her so I can live with myself afterward.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 02:42 PM
0

Too bad he's an idiot whose presidency America would have a significant chance of not surviving.
/r/MensRights14/09/16 02:18 PM
48

How can the adopters possibly claim to have more of a right to the child than the biological parent who always wanted the child and from whom she was taken without his knowledge?
/r/MensRights07/09/16 03:54 PM
2

In the beginning they were "Real American Heroes" instead of "Real Men of Genius" but they changed it in the aftermath of 9/11 because they thought it belittled the troops and first responders.
/r/MensRights26/08/16 04:48 PM
1

1 is what I always understood respect to mean.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 05:45 PM
1

That's what I'm saying. Courtesy should be given freely to everyone. You're not one of those people, but /r/STEM_logic is.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 03:57 PM
2

No, we aren't. Read the conversation and see what people are actually saying.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 03:42 PM
3

I think the problem is people having different ideas about what "respect" means. A lot of people say "respect" when they actually mean "courtesy".
/r/MensRights24/08/16 03:41 PM
2

Courtesy should be the default. Respect is something else. Courtesy is a way you act toward someone. Respect is a way you feel towards someone.
/r/MensRights24/08/16 03:40 PM
1

I think the one way in the back on the left is asian.
/r/MensRights21/08/16 03:21 PM
1

Oh my god, I can't believe the fucking whining by the author of this article.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 01:41 PM
14

Also, teenagers who are still trying to figure themselves out and hear tumbr shit constantly.
/r/MensRights16/08/16 11:57 AM
1

I understand. I know what it's like to be talking about one thing in particular and be taken the wrong way.
/r/MensRights15/08/16 02:54 AM
18

It only helps actual rapists get away with their crime easier by casting further doubt on actual victims. Is that really the only problem you have with it?
/r/MensRights14/08/16 04:55 PM
3

What do you think the appropriate reaction should be?
/r/MensRights10/08/16 02:06 PM
5

One of the purposes of this subreddit is feminism assuming that men have it a lot better than we really do. Don't you go doing the same to them.
/r/MensRights30/07/16 07:30 AM
2

I didn't say anything about this particular case. My exact words were "Someone could feel..." /u/JD-King said "Withdrawing your claim is literally the equivalent of saying 'he didn't rape me.'", implying that is the only possible reason for withdrawing the case. I am providing a possible counterexample.
/r/MensRights30/07/16 07:28 AM
8

Explain please? What hypocrisy are you accusing me of?
/r/MensRights29/07/16 11:10 PM
14

No it isn't. Someone could feel that the chance of putting their rapist in prison isn't worth the further emotional trauma that the trial is putting them through. Don't ever assume that you know what's going on in someone else's mind, especially someone you don't know anything about.
/r/MensRights29/07/16 11:06 PM
6

Yeah. Sexism. That's totally the reason Bernie Sanders supporters are all switching over to Jill Stein.
/r/MensRights27/07/16 11:04 PM
2

This movie is to the Ghostbusters franchise what The Next Karate Kid was to the Karate Kid franchise.
/r/MensRights26/07/16 01:27 AM
1

Hey, I own a kilt and I love wearing it.
/r/MensRights22/07/16 07:12 PM
5

I'm glad to see I'm not the only one who absolutely hated Bridesmaids. And it's really hard to get me to hate a movie. The only other movie I can think of that I really hated was Signs.
/r/MensRights19/07/16 01:40 PM
1

Mental note: Never go to the UK
/r/MensRights15/07/16 02:41 PM
2

I'm sorry, but have you seen this fucking economy? There are way too many people who don't have a choice in what job they have to take.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 02:32 PM
1

I used to have a pinched nerve in my neck. It was fucking agonizing. Shooting pain down my arm. I could barely lie still when I was in the MRI for it. I eventually got some therapy for it. They gave me a neck traction device. 15 minutes a day in a head harness attached to the top of a door. I never found out what caused it. It just started one day.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 02:30 PM
16

How about by Hulk Hogan, then by lightning?
/r/MensRights13/07/16 02:15 PM
4

Did anyone point out her assumption?
/r/MensRights12/07/16 04:47 PM
3

It was on PC, too.
/r/MensRights09/07/16 09:29 PM
4

I'd also like to know which percentage of the males using the terms were not actually calling anyone by it.
/r/MensRights08/07/16 08:24 PM
170

it is understood they will now be separated with one staying at the prison and another being sent to a female wing at either Edinburgh, Greenock or Grampian. Yes! I was hoping they wouldn't get sent to the same prison.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 04:33 PM
1

I'm pretty sure the distinction of whether they should know better is lost on the victims.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 12:05 PM
1

Pajor is naive and doesn't understand the mentalities involved in religiously based terrorism. That being said, the person who wrote the article is a massive dick.
/r/MensRights30/06/16 04:52 AM
6

I am opposed to a female draft. I am equally opposed to a male draft. I'd rather we have neither, but if we're going to have one, we need to have both.
/r/MensRights29/06/16 01:35 PM
3

The second sentence starts with "she".
/r/MensRights24/06/16 08:51 PM
2

It's alright for anyone to have any sexual preference they want. No one has a right to tell you who you should or shouldn't share your body with. Your preferences are yours to determine and no one else's.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 07:09 PM
1

Gawker isn't dropping out of the picture. They're filing bankruptcy to protect their money so they don't have to pay Hulk Hogan.
/r/MensRights22/06/16 07:06 PM
2

That's actually due to lobbying by companies like H&R Block and TurboTax.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 11:50 AM
1

What other kinds of service are you thinking? Something like AmeriCorps?
/r/MensRights21/06/16 11:47 AM
3

Unlike the right, at least the left doesn't elect its lunatics to public office.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 03:32 PM
2

Hey. I'm left and I think this woman not only doesn't deserve a dime, but needs to be in prison.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 03:06 PM
5

Funny how when I was a kid I was beaten over the head with the fact that girls mature faster than boys.
/r/MensRights19/06/16 03:02 PM
-11

My point was that claiming that it's ok because it's legal is a bad argument since there are plenty of things that are legal that aren't ok. Not to mention things that are illegal that are ok.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 09:35 PM
-26

Really?
/r/MensRights17/06/16 08:57 PM
-12

For all the people saying that if something is legal, there is nothing wrong with doing it, tell me if there is nothing wrong with police arresting men who are the victims of domestic violence in places where the law demands it.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 08:26 PM
-6

Spoken like a true jackass.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 08:22 PM
-1

"Ok" is not determined by the law. The law is created by humans who have their own biases, agendas and shortsightedness. If "Ok" were determined by the law, it would never be necessary to change or repeal a law.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 08:21 PM
-49

And because something is legal, that means it's ok?
/r/MensRights17/06/16 08:18 PM
1

It almost sounds like there's a dismissive attitude about female paedophile rapists in that countRy system. FIFY Also, no. Not all female pedophiles, just the pretty ones.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 12:54 PM
19

Explain the muslim women who violently support this culture.
/r/MensRights13/06/16 12:03 PM
1

I did have a father growing up. It's a mother that I didn't have.
/r/MensRights11/06/16 03:05 AM
5

I didn't think the second one was that bad. Nowhere near as good as the original, but at least deserving to stand beside it
/r/MensRights10/06/16 09:48 PM
2

Why are they allowed to do this?
/r/MensRights10/06/16 08:24 PM
5

Really? I hated Bridesmaids with a passion. And it's really hard to get me to actually hate a movie. The only other movies I can think of that I genuinely hated were Signs and the Final Fantasy movie.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 04:32 PM
7

No, plenty of women can run things just fine. It's when anyone, man or woman, who has an agenda they want to shove down everyone's throat run things, that's when things get 2nd rate with a quickness.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 04:30 PM
17

I was already not planning on seeing it, but after this, I refuse to ever watch it. It will be forgotten in two years and never counted among the "Ghostbusters" movies.
/r/MensRights10/06/16 04:27 PM
12

MySpace still exists
/r/MensRights09/06/16 05:06 PM
-3

If Bernie Sanders doesn't run third party, I'm writing him in.
/r/MensRights08/06/16 06:24 PM
2

I don't know if she meant it. I don't know if she even understands the concept of meaning what she says.
/r/MensRights07/06/16 12:04 AM
2

Ok, it was RISUG that I was thinking of. My mistake.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 11:49 PM
1

Vasalgel lasts 10 years and you can get a different injection to turn it off whenever you want.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 08:47 PM
1

There's another injectable one called Vasalgel that doesn't block the canals, but rather lines them. It has an inherent negative electric field that rips the sperm apart as they try to pass through.
/r/MensRights31/05/16 08:26 PM
5

With her anger management problems, there's a good chance she'll end up pissing off the wrong inmates in prison.
/r/MensRights17/05/16 10:42 AM
3

I don't think that it's necessarily women's nature any more than it's men's nature. There are plenty of women who can be satisfied with what they have, and men too, and plenty of men and women for whom nothing is ever enough. I think it's impossible to do a gender breakdown on that particular character trait.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 01:37 PM
18

In the version I read, in his last trip out to see the fish, the fish commented that he keeps asking for what his wife wants, and the fish asked him what he wanted. The fisherman replied that he just wanted his wife to be happy. The fish told him to go home, and there he found his mud hut with his wife happily spinning cloth.
/r/MensRights12/05/16 07:29 AM
9

In DailyMail's defense, they did post this response to the original article.
/r/MensRights11/05/16 01:35 PM
4

And at no point does the article ever mention the word "rape". :/
/r/MensRights04/05/16 01:50 PM
6

That's horrible, but it's sounds more like a case of a badly written law, or combination of laws, where the legislators didn't think through all the possible situations.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 01:00 PM
49

Dad's can babysit if they are watching someone other than their own kids.
/r/MensRights25/04/16 06:35 PM
3

What I don't get is that she wasn't even speaking for any minorities. As far as she knew, there were no racial minorities even involved in the situation. If he had been white like she thought, it would have had no relevance on the situation.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 10:08 PM
5

The 51% might just be the US, while it's 49% globally.
/r/MensRights24/04/16 08:46 PM
171

Wait, she was white and she told you to check your white privilege?
/r/MensRights24/04/16 02:00 PM
27

Rape is considered so heinous a crime that not even innocence is a defense.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 12:00 AM
11

Holy fuck. Is this what it's come to? The alleged victim not only at no point ever saying she was raped, but in fact is screaming all up and down campus that she wasn't raped, and they still kick him out based on the assumption of a third party?
/r/MensRights20/04/16 11:57 PM
2

I'm not just talking about the subculture in prisons. I'm talking about the culture at large that condones and jokes about prison rape and considers it to just be part of the punishment.
/r/MensRights17/04/16 11:58 AM
85

There is a rape culture, but it's mainly concerned with mens prisons.
/r/MensRights16/04/16 11:58 AM
9

No, you need to teach him that it's ok to embrace the "girlish" if he wants to. And if he doesn't, that's ok too.
/r/MensRights14/04/16 09:01 PM
9

Pretty much how it works in the US with petitions.whitehouse.gov. Shoots off a form memo saying why they're going to do jack. They kept raising the number of signatures required when issues they didn't want to talk about kept passing the bar.
/r/MensRights09/04/16 03:39 PM
3

I had to promise to fight to the death if called upon in order to be allowed to vote. In fact, it would have been a felony for me to have not done so.
/r/MensRights05/04/16 11:59 AM
2

Yeah. I want to see the reaction
/r/MensRights04/04/16 01:50 PM
4

The white men with real power aren't voted in at all. They're appointed by a board of directors (and typically buy off the people who are voted in)
/r/MensRights04/04/16 12:05 PM
1

I figured. Just like petition.whitehouse.gov is the official one for the US.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 06:25 PM
10

No. I'm just impressed when I see that kind of thing, from a man or a woman.
/r/MensRights28/03/16 06:11 PM
3

There have been plenty of cases where women have raped adult men, but the law was prevented from calling it "rape".
/r/MensRights28/03/16 03:54 PM
2

In the US, petition.whitehouse.gov has the same obligation to act. Although the action is generally shooting off a form memo saying basically "fuck you, no".
/r/MensRights28/03/16 03:53 PM
1

Is petition.parliment.uk just as laughable and useless and petition.whitehouse.gov?
/r/MensRights28/03/16 03:51 PM
45

So he allowed himself to be tortured to death for his family's security?
/r/MensRights28/03/16 01:56 PM
73

FYI, 6 of the 20 people executed during the Salem Witch Trials were men. Around 150 total people were arrested for witchcraft. Some of the records have been lost, but a list of the surviving names can be found here
/r/MensRights28/03/16 11:34 AM
9

Being a progressive isn't a bad thing. It's being a mindless progressive that's bad: when you keep progressing in the same direction without looking at where you're going. Sometimes course corrections are needed.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 03:31 PM
10

Spreadumm's comment implied that all black people look at the world that way. Yes, a lot of black people do. A lot of white people do, too.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 06:26 AM
11

Everything's a race issue to them Seriously? Can we not lump everyone of a certain race and sex together and call them racist? The irony is a teensy bit suffocating.
/r/MensRights24/03/16 06:11 AM
5

America is absolutely ready for a female president. Hillary Clinton, however, does not deserve the honor of being said president.
/r/MensRights18/02/16 02:38 PM
5

You need to redo this and only use the count of female students.
/r/MensRights16/02/16 05:33 PM
15

Rosie the Riveter would bitchslap a lot of modern feminists.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 07:31 PM
72

When most colleges reported zero rapes recently, they decided the only possibility was that the victims were afraid to come forward.
/r/MensRights24/01/16 04:41 PM
1

Any juicy responses to the proofreader?
/r/MensRights19/01/16 07:34 PM
24

Yeah, and why do you think no one but corporate giants can even try to compete? Because of the existing companies manipulating the law to give themselves a monopoly.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 05:23 PM
33

I believe a lot of the issues America faces stem from too much corporate freedom and lack of oversight. Giant corporations are basically running the government for their own profit. They need to be reined in.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 05:09 PM
3

Any particular reason you don't support Sanders?
/r/MensRights12/01/16 04:33 PM
97

"Child support is essentially a form of strict liability," says the law review article, "with the justification being that the child is an innocent party" The state needs to stop pretending that it gives a damn about innocent parties. The father was an innocent party and it obviously doesn't give a damn about him.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 09:15 PM
5

Why are you friends with this person?
/r/MensRights05/01/16 02:41 AM
175

You know there will be people who think he should stay in jail.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 02:40 AM
5

The problem is that there are feminists who want to start claiming that "yes" might not even mean "yes".
/r/MensRights04/01/16 07:52 PM
1

"Solving child murder is simple. Women just need to stop doing it."
/r/MensRights02/01/16 02:58 PM
2

Erin Pizzey ran one. She was able to see through the bullshit.
/r/MensRights02/01/16 02:57 PM
6

In that case, the fact that she regretted it makes it internalized misogyny.
/r/MensRights30/12/15 06:32 PM
2

And women are not inherently victims
/r/MensRights29/12/15 04:29 AM
2

We're specifically talking about rape by envelopment
/r/MensRights28/12/15 06:17 AM
3

And when the male descriptions get dangerously close to comparing with the female descriptions, place them in the shredder and chalk it up to the men being melodramatic.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 09:35 PM
5

That too
/r/MensRights27/12/15 09:32 PM
136

Also known as wild-ass assumptions.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 05:17 PM
803

How the fuck does she know what the male victims' experience is like?
/r/MensRights27/12/15 03:20 PM
1

Is she a demigod? She is a supernatural being in that she was fashioned from clay and given life, at least in some incarnations.
/r/MensRights27/12/15 02:03 AM
15

Still too chicken to cast a genuinely muscular woman in the role of Wonder Woman.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 11:06 PM
18

Honestly, even if she had told him before the abortion, the decision should still be entirely hers whether to carry to term or not. The real injustice is when the mother gives birth, doesn't want the kid, and gives it up for adoption without any input from the father.
/r/MensRights26/12/15 04:39 PM
1

Or serve in the military but not drink alcohol
/r/MensRights23/12/15 01:21 AM
3

Here's an article with a little more information http://bismarcktribune.com/news/local/crime-and-courts/two-accused-of-photographing-sex-with-minor/article_322e77dd-f41d-56ac-922a-ae4ca6c309f8.html I can't find ANY source that gives an age for the girl.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 09:39 PM
6

The minor was female.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 09:30 PM
1

I like how they give her sentence in months so it sounds like more.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 09:29 PM
2

The middle ground is personal choice and responsibility. Getting too far away from that in any direction is always a bad thing.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 08:33 AM
5

No, you can't. The belief should be judged on its own merits or lack thereof. If you understand why you hold or don't hold a position, then it shouldn't matter who else holds it. Holding a belief doesn't mean that you stand with other people who hold that belief.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 07:13 AM
6

Don't let other people's idiocy change your beliefs. Just because they take things too far doesn't mean you have to move in the opposite direction. The justice or rightness of a position you hold is not affected by how other people behave.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 03:28 AM
-6

I just hope it doesn't push the pendulum too far in the other direction.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 01:00 AM
10

I am actually pleasantly shocked that his name isn't being revealed.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 02:50 PM
3

This is not a new idea
/r/MensRights17/12/15 04:58 AM
143

Also remember that the vast majority of women don't think we have anything to apologize for either.
/r/MensRights16/12/15 02:34 AM
12

Then why not call it humanism? Because humanism already has a specific meaning. The word you're looking for is egalitarianism.
/r/MensRights04/12/15 01:12 PM
1

I don't like making generalizations about an entire gender like that. I'm sure that what you're saying about the women that you've personally met is true, but I think you have to take into account the environment you're meeting them in and what kind of people you're likely to find there. There are plenty of sensible, honest women that actually produce things. There are also a lot of stupid men that don't. Just because you aren't likely to meet those people in your work environment doesn't mean t…
/r/MensRights03/12/15 07:24 PM
3

Only because men will be laughed at if they make any accusations, false or not.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 06:08 PM
-1

She actually knows that, but is just trying to make a point.
/r/MensRights30/11/15 03:33 AM
2

She was stressing men being harmed. Beyond that she was mostly walking about the child being harmed, with a mention of extended family.
/r/MensRights25/11/15 10:50 PM
5

It doesn't matter what she thought. She doesn't get to unilaterally make that decision against the father's wishes.
/r/MensRights22/11/15 02:10 PM
4

Feminism is about women, and nothing but women. It's in the very name.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 03:08 PM
6

/r/tumblrinaction /r/socialjusticeinaction Prepare to have your faith in humanity obliterated
/r/MensRights20/11/15 02:05 PM
26

Don't confuse the dictionary definition of feminism with how it's actually practiced. You can define words any way you like. That doesn't mean that that's how they work in the real world.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 02:02 PM
2

The cases where it is used where it shouldn't apply is when the person who claimed to be raped had consensual sex but regretted it later. There are plenty of cases where it should be used but it isn't. Rape is where a person is forced or coerced into having sex against their will. It doesn't need a gendered definition.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 06:47 PM
3

Because she never had sex with them and the article doesn't say she did. She still needs to go to prison for a very long time.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 06:24 PM
3

Because that definition was concocted by people who want to insist that women can't rape men. Why should we invent a new word? That one works just fine, and it already has all the horrific connotations that forced penetration deserves. New words might be accepted all the time, but the definitions of existing words are also expanded and modified all the time.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 06:21 PM
4

Where did it say she had sex with them? It says she forced two of them to have sex with each other.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 06:19 PM
3

See, I never understood that. I would think it would be brain size compared to the actual number of individual muscles in the body, rather than the mass of the body.
/r/MensRights13/11/15 12:38 PM
1

Yeah, I should have mentioned that actual brain mass isn't all that relevant (down to a certain point, anyway).
/r/MensRights13/11/15 12:36 PM
35

It's a biological fact that women have smaller brains than men do, on average. Granted, women do have several thousand more neurons per mm 3
/r/MensRights13/11/15 06:40 AM
4

Three months in prison if he pleads guilty vs seven years if it goes to trial and he's found guilty.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 06:06 AM
4

It's disgusting that a freakin' judge wouldn't understand why an innocent person would plead guilty because they know they had almost no chance of winning a trial. I can't believe his lawyer didn't tell him to plead "no contest" instead of guilty.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 04:23 AM
27

If he was serious about his legal issues he would have hired a Lawyer Yes, because he obviously had money burning a hole in his pocket to do that with.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 04:21 AM
1

How about the hockey team?
/r/MensRights10/11/15 08:53 PM
3

Thing is when he said it, he was using it as government policy, not a warning.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 02:38 PM
1

You realize Pao isn't with Reddit any more, right?
/r/MensRights03/11/15 01:05 PM
1

I was talking in general.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 06:12 AM
1

Looking at this asshole's post history, you can see that he's the kind of person who thinks that it's his responsibility to teach others that their opinions are wrong and his are right.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 05:55 AM
1

Rape fantasies are fine, as long as it's pre-negotiated and you've got a safe word.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 05:49 AM
1

No, I read the entire text. What inspired the response was your link to fucking RoK.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 05:47 AM
1

BEGONE!
/r/MensRights03/11/15 05:35 AM
113

Interesting fact about the Sandy Hook massacre. All of the adults killed were women... because there were only two male employees at that school: a fourth grade teacher and a janitor. There's a good chance he wasn't targeting women like some people claimed, he just couldn't find any adult males to shoot.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 05:30 AM
1

I've had depression for most of my life, but have never contemplated suicide. I have way too much existential angst to even consider it. Things have gotten a lot better this past year, though.
/r/MensRights02/11/15 03:19 PM
0

Let the national council know. See how long those atheists stay in scouting. Edit: To whoever downvoted me, my point is that local troop leaders might welcome atheists, but if the national council finds out, those atheists will be drummed out of the Boy Scouts if they don't recant their unbelief.
/r/MensRights01/11/15 12:25 PM
1

Somehow this will be spun as discrimination against women.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 02:27 PM
1

The article is from 3 years ago.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 02:26 PM
2

This is from 2012, too.
/r/MensRights31/10/15 02:26 PM
1

They still ban atheists.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 06:19 AM
7

Bla
/r/MensRights23/10/15 06:47 PM
1

I've been a programmer/web dev for 15 years and I don't even have a degree.
/r/MensRights20/10/15 11:27 AM
5

Transgender and homosexual are two completely different things. There have been guys who transitioned and lived as lesbians.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 11:25 AM
1

Currently. It wasn't always that way.
/r/MensRights16/10/15 12:13 PM
8

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_female_United_States_presidential_and_vice-presidential_candidates
/r/MensRights16/10/15 02:43 AM
1

This doesn't really give us any information. I'd at least like to know how old the kid was.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 07:55 PM
2

What sort of proof would you need to support a word holding a particular definition.
/r/MensRights11/10/15 04:48 PM
2

Yes, they are awesome.
/r/MensRights10/10/15 08:27 PM
5

C# here. Hilarious!
/r/MensRights10/10/15 08:12 PM
1

That was more directed to the aforementioned feminists than to you.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 02:18 PM
1

Really? So minorities shouldn't be protected, then?
/r/MensRights05/10/15 01:55 PM
1

Make sure you bring a huge stack of cases showing that, yes, women actually do sometime file false rape charges.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 01:54 PM
2

And if the genders were switched? A 15 year old girl with a 40 year old man? Then what?
/r/MensRights02/10/15 11:33 PM
-11

That would be the plastic surgery and possibly photo manipulation, then.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 05:44 PM
31

It's a little early to go pigeonholeing him on that third one.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 09:57 PM
4

It's not even MRAs that are doing this stupid shit. It's the damn RoKs. Of course they don't allow comments.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 07:57 PM
3

Sounds like they didn't know they were being given special treatment.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 07:50 PM
4

I'd be surprised if she got 10 days.
/r/MensRights25/09/15 02:26 PM
2

You don't need feminism. You need to fucking express what you actually mean instead of blaming men for not being able to read your mind.
/r/MensRights21/09/15 02:32 PM
2

No. That is someplace that no one should ever go. If this story is real (which I'm not sure it is), she just needs to spend the rest of her life in a cell.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 08:52 PM
2

The story is nowhere else on the internet. She might not be human because someone made up her and the rest of the story. I hope that's the case.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 08:50 PM
2

Would have been better if the father had the option of getting custody.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 08:41 PM
3

Seems it was less sense and heart and more impatience for her bullshit.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 08:40 PM
1

racial nepotism You mean "racism"?
/r/MensRights09/09/15 03:51 PM
1

That might have been a reference to an earlier conversation.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 08:14 PM
21

I think they should have a minimum set of requirements for front line soldiers, and anyone who meets them, men or women, should be allowed to serve the position. Granted that very few women would meet the requirement, but there could be some that would. There are tons of men that wouldn't meet the requirements, either.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 03:22 PM
14

LOOK IT UP Right. Look up the definition of sexism that SJWs have concocted specifically to make women immune from accusations of sexism? I'd rather not.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 03:19 PM
3

Do a google image search on "Asian with beard"
/r/MensRights01/09/15 06:20 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JaLiWVTRVeU
/r/MensRights31/08/15 07:17 PM
5

Only if she deliberately lied.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 10:09 PM
2

I don't think he should be able to sue just because it was proved wrong. He should be able to sue if it can be shown that she deliberately lied.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 10:08 PM
0

I love how the author is destroyed by almost everyone in that comments section
/r/MensRights28/08/15 07:20 PM
6

Someone in a lesbian relationship cheats? It's a man's fault.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 07:32 PM
28

The article says that the other two children were returned after the coroner's report said that the deaths weren't suspicious. That was from the prosecutor.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 06:11 AM
6

This has no names of people or places attached to it. If it did, then it would be a problem.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 02:03 AM
2

I know a huge gaggle of women, any one of which would have him wimpering for mercy and begging for more. And no, that remark had nothing to do with sex.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 01:58 AM
11

And yet, this sort of thing does happen in real life.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 01:39 AM
4

How old are you?
/r/MensRights13/08/15 01:37 AM
3

Maybe this particular picture is real, maybe it's fake. It doesn't really matter since this kind of thing does actually happen.
/r/MensRights13/08/15 01:34 AM
1

With almost certain untraceable retaliation if he does.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 08:45 PM
15

Lots of judges forbid jury nullification from even being mentioned in the courtroom.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 02:28 PM
6

Oh, none of them see it that way. They'll come up with some excuse or another as to why putting prostitutes in prison helps women. But the devaluing of sex is the real reason behind it. Kind of like how most pro-lifers don't actually care about the fetus, but just want to enforce the consequences of what they consider to be sin, but will never admit it.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 03:40 PM
20

"Free Inhabitant" a reference to the Articles of Confederation, which ceased to apply when they were replaced with the US Constitution.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 03:35 PM
2

And yet, people who have lived as both men and women tend to agree that women have it easier.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 03:25 PM
22

Even if they have real reason to believe he is guilty, you don't hold him down and beat the shit out of him. You call the police, or at least the bouncer.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 03:43 PM
20

Did you just join this subreddit today?
/r/MensRights29/07/15 05:08 AM
2

Not everyone within the same society gets socialize perfectly the same way, though. There are always going to be outliers who look at the world differently.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 02:53 PM
9

Right, because all guys are supposed to have the same physical tastes in women, and standards of beauty are objective and universal.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 04:05 AM
9

No, she isn't. I've seen women that could be described as whales. She's not one of them. Her ugliness is on the inside.
/r/MensRights24/07/15 02:14 AM
6

I don't even think high heels are sexy. I look at a woman wearing them and all I can think of is how uncomfortable they must be.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 11:15 PM
16

There's nothing wrong with her appearance. She's just an arrogant bitch. And I do not use that word lightly.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 11:12 PM
3

Lately? Feminists.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 06:28 PM
6

Of course, feminists will spin this, saying that it's because of the assumption that women are weak and helpless.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 02:15 PM
3

What percentage of men who are accused of domestic abuse are arrested (probably close to 100%)? And what percentage of women who are accused of domestic abuse are arrested?
/r/MensRights23/07/15 02:15 PM
7

And yet, they try to smack men down whenever they do try to stand up for their rights.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 09:55 PM
2

A demographic doesn't have feelings or rights that can be violated. Only individuals do. Racism and sexism happen between individuals, and their effect is not mitigated by the standing of other members of the victim's sex and race.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 09:53 PM
2

So sex is something that is done by the man and done to the woman? What if the woman is on top?
/r/MensRights13/07/15 05:01 PM
6

I can guarantee that there are people out there who would still consider Jake to be the rapist in that case.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 04:58 PM
0

More an assumption that courts make than an actual law.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 04:58 PM
2

The woman just got time served, but they both have to register as sex offenders.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 02:27 PM
2

I would have taken that caption and written it directly on the poster.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 02:24 PM
9

The thing is, a lot of feminists think that they are fighting for equality, but they are doing so from a position that women are always victimized in society, so any improvements in conditions for women are automatically in the direction of equality, not realizing when they have actually passed equality and are now moving in the other direction. Of course, then there are other feminists who admit that they don't give a damn about men and acknowledge that they are fighting for female supremacy.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 03:29 PM
14

There was a female author who disguised herself as a man for 18 months to see how men were treated. At the end, after weighing the pros and cons of each, she concluded that women actually have it better off in our society.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 03:16 PM
1

The comments beneath that are pretty great, too.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 07:16 PM
4

The colloquial term is "tough shit".
/r/MensRights18/06/15 08:31 PM
5

Even if can can prove via a DNA test that he isn't the biological father, he still has to pay.
/r/MensRights18/06/15 08:31 PM
4

Is that, in fact, what he was doing, or is that just your interpretation of "the answer to the crisis of masculinity lies with feminism"? Is he saying that men need to become feminists, or is he saying that men should look at some of the things feminism is doing for women and adopt a similar model for themselves?
/r/MensRights15/06/15 08:03 PM
1

Yes, and poking fun at ZombieAlpacaLips' definition.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 03:53 PM
2

I know. It's just getting off my ass and doing it that's the problem.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 03:53 PM
0

While claiming to be fighting for equality.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 03:52 PM
2

It actually gets kind of warm in here in summer. I had to bring in a small floor fan. The server room is freezing, yeah.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 03:32 PM
1

I tend to wear buttoned short sleeve shirts, fairly wrinkled, colored or prints, not tucked in, but clean.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 03:29 PM
-6

This is pointing out the hypocrisy of feminism.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 03:18 PM
6

I work in a nice office and today I'm wearing cargo shorts. Where does that put me? BTW, I'm in IT.
/r/MensRights15/06/15 03:17 PM
13

There's been a push to voat.co.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 03:57 AM
1

Unfortunately, the crazy often doesn't reveal itself until after you've stuck your dick in it.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 07:50 PM
2

I used to have a girlfriend years ago who did most of these things. Thankfully I was able to get away from her. Unfortunately it drove me into the arms of someone who, although nice and sweet and diametrically opposite from psychogirl, still wasn't right for me. We ended up being together for 6 years and living together for 4. I think I've now found a relationship where we fulfill each other's needs.
/r/MensRights18/05/15 07:49 PM
1

It just takes one to make the cup worth it.
/r/MensRights14/05/15 06:44 AM
3

So are we
/r/MensRights11/05/15 02:53 PM
1

Yes, and raising the GDP is totally worth destroying hundreds of thousands of human lives. Especially since it's been shown that wars are the only known method of increasing the GDP. \s
/r/MensRights11/05/15 02:12 PM
2

Except that male sperm donors aren't getting sued for child support unless they actually had a relationship with the kid.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 02:23 PM
3

Kind of falls apart when you consider men who are on the hook for child support when they have DNA tests that prove that the kid isn't even theirs.
/r/MensRights08/05/15 02:19 PM
1

For the record, do you consider it pedophilia for young adult men to target 13, 14 or 15 year old females? And what exactly are you considering to be "young adult"?
/r/MensRights28/04/15 08:07 PM
1

Not only has this been removed from /r/funny, but most of the top comments are in agreement with the protesters. Of course, that could be from the links to it here.
/r/MensRights21/04/15 07:24 AM
8

Why are there women-only tournaments?
/r/MensRights20/04/15 03:53 PM
11

I was once called racist because I didn't vote for Obama in 2012 even after explaining that I did vote for him in 2008.
/r/MensRights18/04/15 12:30 PM
3

That's my point. It doesn't matter what the dress code is at the place, for the interview you dress professionally. This entitled brat doesn't get that.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 11:53 PM
40

I'm a programmer. I work at a place where I wear jeans and hiking shoes every day. You know what I wore to the job interview? A fucking suit and tie.
/r/MensRights17/04/15 01:50 PM
5

I've gotten Gold a few times, but I've never paid for it myself.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 03:47 PM
3

She tells me I'm smart and funny, that I make her feel emotionally vulnerable and that that's a new and uncomfortable feeling for her, but I'm worth it. She wanted to just play the field for a while and have a bunch of casual relationships (as did I), but meeting me threw her for a loop, and now she doesn't want to have to live without me.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 03:09 PM
9

Continue to allow it but make sure they don't get paid more for it.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 02:58 PM
2

There's https://voat.co/
/r/MensRights15/04/15 02:57 PM
3

My girlfriend makes me feel special. Or she tries to. I'm still trying to readjust my brain so that I can accept it.
/r/MensRights15/04/15 02:56 PM
2

Not if she's in bed with the same big businesses that all the recent presidents have been.
/r/MensRights12/04/15 06:05 PM
-2

What about a system where, as you vote different things up and down, you get placed in a network of people connected by how they vote, so you tend to see things that were upvoted by people who upvoted the same things you have, and tend not to see things that were downvoted by people who have downvoted the same things you have.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 04:29 PM
7

Not everyone is on facebook. How about retelling the story here?
/r/MensRights31/03/15 05:02 PM
17

The mod policy can be seen on the right-hand sidebar. Unlike feminist subreddits, the mods here try not to censor anyone.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 03:48 PM
6

First of all, Obama is in no sense a "left winger". He's a centrist. In any other industrialized country in the world, he'd be considered a moderate conservative. It's only in America where far-right lunatics have passed themselves off as mainstream conservatives that Obama, or most other Democrats for that matter, look like liberals. Second of all, you have no idea what the new regulations have done. They say NOTHING about filtering internet traffic by content. All they say is that ISPs must tr…
/r/MensRights13/03/15 02:42 PM
3

This sort of thing is why I am worried about the recent takeover of the internet by the Obama administration You're an idiot
/r/MensRights13/03/15 02:34 PM
2

I've seen baby changing stations in men's restrooms. Mainly in malls.
/r/MensRights11/03/15 01:27 PM
4

Google Jock Sturges' book "The Last Day of Summer" and how he was treated. And that book wasn't even supposed to be sexual.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 07:01 PM
10

Real men ignore people who try to tell them what real men do.
/r/MensRights09/03/15 01:40 PM
3

I think there can be reverse racism and sexism, but it's not what is being talked about here. I would think reverse $ism is when a person hates/discriminates against their own demographic group.
/r/MensRights03/03/15 02:36 PM
3

For one day I'm so sick I can't even get on the internet. I get back on and everyone is ranting about what color a dress is. Edit: I actually meant to post this in a different thread. Damn BaconReader.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 12:50 AM
2

I'd say that respect is something that you feel toward someone, although it is reflected in your actions as well, while courtesy is purely a way of acting towards another person.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 02:01 AM
3

You're talking about common courtesy, not respect.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 01:39 AM
6

I don't know about that. L and G have been known to gang up on B.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 04:39 PM
2

I wonder how they'd react to an ad talking about how breast cancer isn't just a woman's disease.
/r/MensRights04/02/15 09:54 PM
1

1 in every 3 women that get heart disease die from it, maybe?
/r/MensRights04/02/15 09:53 PM
2

Ok, limit alimony to cases where the ex-spouse in question actually has been out of the workforce for some number of years, and require that they actually be looking for a job, and cut it off when they get one. Oh, wait. The state gets a cut of the alimony payments and therefore has no incentive to ever limit or end them.
/r/MensRights02/02/15 02:58 PM
14

It was her dorm building, not her dorm room. His girlfriend doesn't necessarily agree with that poster.
/r/MensRights26/01/15 09:17 PM
2

Yeah, I wasn't going to respond to any more of his posts. He's a loser who's determined to keep his post karma at 1337 (The 90s called. They want their douche style back). Obviously an alt account. There is no path from science to bigotry without passing through some kind of ideology.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 08:26 PM
12

come at me anti-darwinists Fuck you. Evolution, and science in general, says absolutely nothing about how we should live. Science is predictive, not prescriptive, asshole.
/r/MensRights13/01/15 04:08 PM
25

Rich people are highest on the social ladder. The fact that most rich people are white males doesn't say anything about white males that aren't rich.
/r/MensRights26/12/14 02:54 PM
3

No, they absolutely should not be allowed to do that. No one should be allowed to permanently alter the body of any infant, boy or girl, for medically unnecessary reasons. If the child wants to have it done once they grow up, that should be their decision. So what if you don't care? Lots of other circumcised people do. All that shows is that you only give a damn about yourself and no one else. No one is saying that being uncut is better than being circumcised. They are saying that bodily autonom…
/r/MensRights10/11/14 09:19 PM
3

Not commonplace in America, but it is one of the types of female circumcision practiced in Muslim countries.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 07:20 PM
9

Took me a second. :)
/r/MensRights10/11/14 04:53 PM
16

And if it were a four year old girl getting her outer labia removed, then how would you feel?
/r/MensRights10/11/14 04:50 PM
74

I'm uncut and I DON'T wish I had been cut as a baby. I'm happy being uncut. So enjoy your dick cheese. Just because the guys you know don't know how to wash their dicks properly, that doesn't mean that no one else does. Maybe try not living in a hick town.
/r/MensRights10/11/14 04:49 PM
1

Disproportionately from the amount they want to be harmed.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 02:00 PM
4

There won't be any comments because it will get immediately deleted.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 02:27 PM
3

In France, they're actually forbidden.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 03:27 PM
27

The women who do that aren't seeking a relationship, they're seeking free financial support.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 03:26 PM
27

Because they begin with the assumption that men will always have more than women.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 10:46 AM
2

I was referring to the word by their definition.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 05:25 AM
6

It's a term that self-declared "alphas" invented so they can get off on pretending that they're better than everyone else. It's just so ridiculously high-school.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 04:33 AM
6

I'm in favor of same-sex marriage, abortion rights, ending the drug war, comprehensive sex education, keeping religion out of government and public schools, taxing the rich and appropriately regulating industries for the protection of everyone. Am I a leftist? I'm also in favor of genuine sexual equality, and I recognise that huge swaths of the feminist movement are fighting for something completely different. Also, I find your use of the term "beta" to be juvenile and pathetic. I would find it …
/r/MensRights24/09/14 02:34 AM
6

He's not trying to sneakily play the game. He's trying to head it off before someone else tries to play it.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 11:41 AM
4

Not quite, because they shouldn't be reporting his name either.
/r/MensRights19/09/14 11:51 AM
10

11 Like it or not, women are always subject to criticism if they show too much feeling in public. What? Does she think that men aren't?
/r/MensRights14/09/14 02:06 PM
10

Where's the streetwise Hercules to fight the rising odds.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 11:54 PM
73

Especially when they take the picture themselves. You can't be both the perpetrator and victim of the same crime.
/r/MensRights08/09/14 12:37 AM
5

Dude. Just, no
/r/MensRights05/09/14 11:45 PM
7

I know that little factoid was shoved in my face a few times when I was a kid.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 11:44 PM
0

So I have to assume that to be his intent. No, that isn't logic, that is phenomenally stupid. You've never done something that led to a completely different result than what you intended? He isn't responsible for their actions. It is more likely than he's lying about his intent, than that he accidentally caused this result And how did you weigh that likelyhood? A wild guess aided by your desire to see the worst in everyone?
/r/MensRights04/09/14 04:15 PM
2

So any post that gets a large number of responses is automatically trolling? Regardless of the poster's intent?
/r/MensRights03/09/14 10:00 PM
1

I would think "trolling" would have to fall into the definition somewhere, and OP doesn't seem to be trolling at all.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 06:24 PM
1

"Apathy troll" needs to fall into common use when accusations of "concern troll" start flying.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 06:22 PM
2

Don't hassle the Hoff!
/r/MensRights02/09/14 09:42 PM
15

Fundy Christians use the devil.
/r/MensRights27/08/14 01:31 AM
-2

No, a person who is brain-dead isn't a person any more. Maybe if they died of hypothermia there's a slim chance of reviving them if they haven't warmed up yet, but otherwise no. We are not talking about an unborn infant in the eighth or ninth month of pregnancy, we're talking about an embryo or fetus in the first trimester. And no, you're an idiot if you think this could have any relevancy to capital punishment or non consensual euthenasia. We are talking about a mass of cells that has no capabi…
/r/MensRights22/08/14 02:39 AM
1

Why do you call it infanticide when it isn't an infant? Why do you call it a person when it doesn't even have the possibility of awareness (unlike someone who is asleep or in a coma)?
/r/MensRights21/08/14 11:06 PM
11

the sentiment of them was that men involved in the pro-choice movement should be supporting and not dominating the conversation. Those are the only two alternatives, then? Supporting and dominating? Says something about the mentality we're dealing with. I guess the possibility of a free and equal voice never occurred to her.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 10:59 PM
1

You're right. This isn't the place for that argument. Apologies to anyone who thinks they are warranted.
/r/MensRights21/08/14 11:19 AM
3

More evidence that feminism is like a religion?
/r/MensRights21/08/14 01:22 AM
2

But when satire makes fun of women or feminists, it's uncalled for and needs to be universally condemned.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 02:35 AM
1

They are looking at the completely irrelevant statistic of how many pedophiles are men when they need to be looking at how many men are pedophiles. Makes you wonder if a lot of discrimination all around would simply go away if the American populace were better at math.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 02:12 AM
4

It is possible for people to change, but not in a vacuum, not from the people around them continuing to act the same way they they have been. Any change needs a catalyst. Now, in your case it turns out not to have been worth it to try. It's good that you found out the truth and got out.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 12:59 PM
12

Please don't make this a liberal vs conservative thing. In pretty much every way, I count as a liberal. I'm in favor of gay marriage and marijuana legalization. I'm in favor of corporate regulations to protect the economy and environment, and common-sense gun restrictions. I stopped liking Obama when I realized how much of a corporate shill he is (that was around 2009). And I also recognise how men's rights are being infringed on in favor of female privilege. The problem isn't liberalism. Libera…
/r/MensRights14/08/14 12:01 PM
1

Some people try to remove the bias while maintaining the stupidity of the law by claiming that they raped each other.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 01:45 AM
2

So if a man and woman are both drunk and they have sex, and they both want to have sex and do it willingly, has a rape occurred? And if so, who is the victim?
/r/MensRights10/08/14 11:58 PM
11

How, exactly, were the police "pressuring" her? How were they preventing her from retracting her statements?
/r/MensRights09/08/14 01:28 PM
2

The thing about blocking out the name and picture on a twitter post is that you can easily find the post by searching for the quote in twitter.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 01:20 PM
5

That's what happens when you overshoot your mark. You've gone too far and are now headed in the wrong direction.
/r/MensRights02/08/14 08:03 PM
4

And she was required to put the money in an educational trust fund for her kids.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 01:38 AM
1

And then there is this content-free mock-fest that was published a couple days ago. http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/07/14/women-against-feminism-show-how-bad-arguments-against-feminism-really-are/
/r/MensRights16/07/14 02:19 PM
2

Has there even been a history of kidnappings at that park? I'm betting there hasn't been.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 07:17 PM
3

Come on, we have no idea if the mother was even involved. The article says she got the idea because of a friend who actually was molested. The last thing we want to do is accuse people without evidence. That's supposed to be one of the things we're fighting against.
/r/MensRights15/07/14 11:05 AM
5

Judges have made the sex offenders list completely worthless. Unless you know the specific offense and the details surrounding it, the fact that someone is on the list means absolutely nothing.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 12:07 PM
3

And what if she changes her mind but doesn't tell you?
/r/MensRights10/07/14 10:16 PM
7

And how exactly do we prove to a court that we got consent? Have the woman sign a fucking contract? Should we have a lawyer there to get it noterized?
/r/MensRights10/07/14 10:15 PM
1

Return Of Kings
/r/MensRights02/07/14 10:33 PM
1

OP won't answer any of us because he's a coward, a troll, and perfectly aware of how completely full of shit he is.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 12:54 PM
2

Please explain how we reinforce your so-called patriarchy.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 10:51 AM
1

Often, no. But it's happening more often than it used to.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 02:10 PM
1

Yes, a specific guy.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 11:07 AM
10

That wasn't Voltaire. It was a neo-nazi who said that, and he was talking about jews.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 05:07 AM
14

But remember that it's not debtor's prison. It obviously can't be since debtor's prisons are illegal.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 05:04 AM
1

I don't have any links handy, but I've seen other cases linked in this subreddit where the woman was convicted.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 04:22 AM
-1

To be fair (to the legal system), this has actually been happening more and more often, lately.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 03:19 AM
3

I stopped liked Jon Stewart when he deliberately misrepresented the 9/11 cross lawsuit, canceled David Silverman who had been booked to appear to talk about the suit that day, and then it turned out he's on the board of directors of the 9/11 museum (and therefore an indirect defendant of the lawsuit).
/r/MensRights25/06/14 07:24 PM
1

My mother passed away from breast cancer when I was four. From what I remember, she wasn't a disciplinarian. As for elementary school, I think I only had one male teacher, and that was in my last year, fifth grade. I think that might have been the only male teacher in the school. That was in 1983/4.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 08:56 PM
1

I want to know if anyone was fighting against the bill.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 04:55 PM
2

What country are you from?
/r/MensRights22/06/14 10:48 AM
5

I've never been to TRP and, from what I've heard, I have no desire to. Everyone should just live in whatever way makes them happiest without shoving a bunch of ideals on everyone else.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 07:38 PM
1

No, you don't. He's usually on the other side.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 08:13 PM
10

Bull. The media isn't liberal and it isn't conservative. The media is corporate. The only agenda it has is turning a profit. Some media outlets pretend to be liberal and others conservative to meet that end.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 04:35 AM
3

They aren't, really. That's just an unfortunate side effect. The policies are put in place because the administrators are terrified of two things: becoming the next Columbine, and using their own judgment and turning out to be wrong so they end up on the wrong end of a lawsuit.
/r/MensRights18/06/14 04:31 AM
7

I'm in favor of gay marriage, abortion rights, ending the drug war (with complete legalization of marijuana, which I have never used and don't know if I would try), heavily taxing the ultra rich, I have no problem with trans people, I think there are serious problems with capitalism that free markets can't fix (I don't necessarily think communism is the way to go, either). I am an atheist. I think that Republican polititians in this country are completely psychotic, but I don't think the Democra…
/r/MensRights14/06/14 11:59 AM
1

Link to this subreddit with the words "mens rights" in various places around the internet, and get lots of other people to do the same. You remember what happened with Rick Santorum, right?
/r/MensRights13/06/14 04:50 AM
7

So that means they can't actually look at a comment and use some kind of actual judgement in determining whether a comment is actually offensive or misogynist rather than automatically and robotically banning any and all dissenting views? Because regardless of what you say, that is what they do. People have been banned just for asking simple questions. The fact is that all they want there is an echo chamber.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 06:43 PM
3

You're right. I mean, there are anti-male bigots out there, but you can't assume that someone is one just because they label themselves a feminist.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 06:13 PM
1

I'd have no problem with it, and I bet most of the people here wouldn't, either. But good luck getting feminists to switch over. Try posting this in /r/feminism and watch what happens. Maybe you won't get banned.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 11:58 AM
5

Take it easy. It's not easy to research something when there's so much misinformation out there.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 05:59 PM
3

Have you considered dropping the "feminist" label in favor of "egalitarian"? You don't have to change a single one of your beliefs.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 03:26 PM
7

It's not just custody battles either, although that's a big one. Women also get far lighter sentences for the same crimes. Men make up the vast majority of homeless, school dropout, mentally diseased and suicides, but enourmous amounts of public funds go specifically to helping women with these problems. Men are commonly not trusted to be around children. Male college students are commonly not allowed to defend themselves in school hearings when they are accused of sexual misconduct. There are d…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 12:04 PM
11

IMO, the name "feminism" encourages the slide into caring more about putting women first than pushing for equality. Deliberately or not, feminism has created a narrative that women are the only possible victims in any given situation, so that is the mentality that these women come from when approaching any social issue. It doesn't matter if men are harmed because it only brings the sexes closer to equality, not recognising the fact that in some areas they have already reached or passed that poin…
/r/MensRights29/05/14 05:57 AM
3

There's another, simpler reason. Plain old intellectual laziness.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 02:23 AM
2

Return Of Kings
/r/MensRights28/05/14 09:53 PM
3

Actually, I think he recanted the next day. Edit: Never mind. I missed the thing he said today.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 09:53 PM
6

There are plenty of MRAs that don't have penises.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 09:51 PM
2

From what I understand, didn't RoK publicly divorce themselves from MRAs?
/r/MensRights28/05/14 03:59 PM
1

That was a woman who is blacked out, too.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 02:40 PM
1

Are you trying to get us label as lunatics?
/r/MensRights25/05/14 04:10 PM
3

It does, but people are desensitized to it so they don't notice.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 04:06 PM
2

I believe it. I'm not surprised in the least.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 04:01 PM
-2

The original idea of libertarianism, maybe. The modern American political party, not so much.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 09:33 PM
1

I'm not saying they don't exist. I'm saying they aren't the ones governing feminism's effects on society, because they aren't the ones doing the screaming. And there are plenty of academic feminists that are exactly the type that I'm talking about, teaching their students these things.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 11:34 AM
6

The philosophy is irrelevant. I'm talking about the movement. The first snowball does not represent the avalanche that it starts, no matter how much it might care about the town below. Feminism is a monster that doesn't know how to stop. And it's the worst kind of monster, one that believes that it is good.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:33 PM
6

How something originates has zero to do with what it currently is. Feminism isn't defined by philosophers or books. It is defined be how actual feminists act in the name of feminism. It is the people in a movement that define it, not individuals who write books on what they think it should be. Why does Simone de Beauvoir have any more right to speak for feminism than the college stutents protesting against Warren Ferrell?
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:25 PM
6

And transform society into a matriarchy. Feminism isn't pushing towards equality. It might believe that it is, but it's doing so from a belief that women can only ever be helpless victims. When that is the case, the result is that feminism is pushing towards female supremacy, and it doesn't care how many men or women it steps on to get its way.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:17 PM
10

See? You're doing it right now. You're disregarding the idea that feminism can cause problems.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:08 PM
15

You mean the same boogeyman that holds massive protests, screams epithets and pulls fire alarms when men have the temerity to discuss their issues in public? Instead of just trolling on this subreddit, why don't you try actually reading it?
/r/MensRights12/05/14 06:04 PM
10

It comes from observing feminism in the real world rather than handwaving away all the damage that feminism does and trying to get people to only pay attention to the meaningless philosophy that even feminists dont pay attention to unless it encourages what they already want to believe.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 05:55 PM
16

So even when men are the ones being hurt it's because men are the problem. Rule #1 of feminism: Women and feminism are incapable of causing problems. Men are the source of all problems in society.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 05:39 PM
13

We don't care what feminist philosophers say. Do you know who else doesn't care? The majority of feminists. We care about what feminism is actually doing.
/r/MensRights12/05/14 05:37 PM
1

It shouldn't matter that men are typically stronger. Some men will be strong enough to handle it, some won't. Some women will be strong enough to handle it, some won't. I agree that there will be more men that are strong enough, but that isn't a reason to eliminate women from the running entirely.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 03:18 PM
2

Here's a question they didn't list. "Why does the law say I have to register?" Also "Why don't women have to register?"
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:39 AM
13

Real feminism isn't defined by how actual feminists act in the real world. It's defined by Gender Studies "academics" trying to make feminism palatable.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 01:58 PM
9

Umm... yeah? Competent men are getting bypassed by overconfident men, too.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 06:09 AM
1

I don't think he was talking about Vasalgel. I think he was talking about this fundraiser.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 05:26 AM
6

So why should girls keep themselves "pure" ? To increase their own value as mates to men with options. Bull. I want a woman who knows what the hell she's doing. I agree with your first paragraph. Your second paragraph is just stupid. I leave you un-voted upon.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 05:18 AM
29

Moron doesn't understand the difference between "percentage of pedophiles who are male" and "percentage of males who are pedophiles". The latter is the only one that is important. The former means nothing.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 03:19 PM
5

Don't downvote this person. Never downvote someone for asking for a source. Instead, go find them one and shove it down their throat.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 10:17 PM
5

Is there a backup of his blog somewhere?
/r/MensRights24/04/14 10:03 PM
5

He had a choice between not seeing his kids here and not seeing his kids somewhere else.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 08:14 PM
14

Hopefully they google his name at some point.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 08:11 PM
4

Democrats do shitty things, yes. But Republican politicians would be happy to see America come completely crashing down as long as (A) they can blame it on the Democrats, and (B) they get to rule over the resulting smoking crater. I'm an independent, btw.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 05:07 PM
17

"We shouldn't have to apologize, we're trying to get the ___ vote by pandering instead of talking about real issues" - every politician ever
/r/MensRights24/04/14 11:32 AM
2

... yes. Men get longer prison sentences than women. That was my point. As a white person, he'll get a shorter prison sentence than a black person, but as a white male he'll get a longer sentence that a white female. I have no idea what the figures are for black women.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 04:44 PM
1

leniency from the justice system As a white person, yeah, but definitely not as a male.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 11:55 AM
18

You colored the poster pink, but I just want to confirmm. That was a woman saying it?
/r/MensRights22/04/14 11:38 AM
3

He did admit that the results were falsely calculated.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 08:10 PM
1

The only Republican I've seen run for President lately who I'd even consider voting for is Jon Huntsman. All the rest are sad parodies of the political system.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 03:27 AM
1

Try to find any politician who wouldn't who isn't a far right psycho. They're all lying bastards, but some are better than others.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 02:53 AM
2

40, here. End the drug war. Stop the NSA spying. Throw banksters in prison. Elect Elizabeth Warren (but absolutely not Hillary Clinton).
/r/MensRights15/04/14 08:07 PM
3

Get this to the top
/r/MensRights15/04/14 08:02 PM
177

I don't think OP is quoting an actual conversation with a bus driver, but just extrapolating what the driver would say based on the poster.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 11:47 AM
1

Reply to them with YetAnotherCommenter's comment
/r/MensRights12/04/14 05:33 PM
4

It depends. What have you been doing to them?
/r/MensRights11/04/14 03:11 PM
8

What about when a lesbian cheats on her female partner?
/r/MensRights06/04/14 08:28 PM
1

You said "in some States". That implies State law.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 11:39 AM
1

The doctor may have reqired it, but the State didn't.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 11:32 AM
0

You're the one who couldn't be bothered to post a link supporting your own claim when asked and you're calling me lazy? You are a massive hypocrite. Also, that link flat out states that there is no legal requirement, and getting the wife's permission is purely a decision that the doctor makes. Edit: Inventing bullshit based on half-understood sources, and then getting defensive when called to substantiate claims is also how the redfems got started.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 11:28 AM
1

Holy fuck, what an asshole
/r/MensRights30/03/14 07:17 PM
1

Now because of the patriarchy... And that's where I stopped reading this entire AMA
/r/MensRights30/03/14 07:16 PM
2

Ok. Here's a question. Why do you, as in individual feminist, feel that you are qualified to speak for the movement?
/r/MensRights30/03/14 07:14 PM
2

Fuck you. You brought it up. It is your fucking job to provide the evidence. It is not our job to take our time scouring the internet to substantiate your claims.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 05:55 PM
2

I don't think those are actual laws. I think those are policies on the part of the individual doctor.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 05:53 PM
5

Is it true that any generalizing statement can be made about bisexual men other that that they are sexually attracted to both men and women?
/r/MensRights30/03/14 05:47 PM
2

Another liberal here who recognizes that much of the feminist movement is counterproductive to achieving sexual equality and justice.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 05:39 PM
7

Also, the villification of the CPS agent.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 01:53 AM
7

He attempted to rape a person. What difference does it make from a legal standpoint if the victim was male or female? What if he intended to rape a blonde woman but it was really a brunette wearing a blonde wig?
/r/MensRights25/03/14 03:12 PM
2

If she had won in 2008, I probably would have voted 3rd party like I ended up doing in 2012, except I voted for Gary Johnson
/r/MensRights24/03/14 04:34 AM
3

Political dynasties are not a good thing.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 04:32 AM
1

Everyone's rights are everyone's responsibility. Why are we making this a gendered issue?
/r/MensRights23/03/14 10:42 PM
8

If Elizabeth Warren were to run, I'd vote for her. Hillary Clinton, not so much. She comes off as just another sleazy, two-faced politician to me.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 10:41 PM
5

We need to stop calling people liberals just because they hold certain positions. The reasons they hold those positions are important as well. A liberal is someone who is open-minded and willing to try new ways of doing things if the old ways aren't working. A liberal is someone who is concerned about everyone's liberty and rights, not just their own or their own group's. That woman is not a liberal.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 10:36 PM
4

Everyone is pro-life. Some people are anti-choice.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 10:33 PM
26

I thought Feminism was about equality? That's adorable. I posted specifically saying that this was a good thing and to hope that MGM prosecutions come soon as as well. That's why you got banned. For suggesting that men deserve any kind of rights or justice.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 11:50 AM
3

Nope. I'm just here to tell you that what you are currently doing is counterproductive. That is, if you care about spreading your ideas and you're not just in it for the lulz, which I'm not entirely convinced of.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 05:16 PM
3

My point is that if you're going to argue, and you care at all about convincing people of your position, the way you present your argument is at least as imporant as the validity of the argument, sometimes more important. It's not right, and it's not fair, but it is true. People are generally not perfect rational agents. Like any other system, they will take the path of least resistance unless effort is applied. Regardless of what you've been told, facts don't speak for themselves. People have t…
/r/MensRights15/03/14 04:10 PM
4

I've read your comments on this thread, and I just wanted to say that, although I agree with your points about copyright, you're being kind of a dick about it.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 12:47 PM
3

According to her site, the AMA was supposed to be about something else.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 12:43 PM
5

Fuck you for thinking 'jokes' like this are funny.
/r/MensRights15/03/14 12:33 PM
-2

Way to read shit into things that I never said, asshat. You could have asked me to clarify what I said and then we could have had a dialog, but now that you've proven yourself to be a troll, that's not going to happen.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 04:19 AM
10

To me, there is no question. It would absolutely have rights. Rights are not granted on the basis of what kind of DNA, if any, something has. They are based on the existence and level of cognitive functions.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 10:23 PM
6

So what if, decades from now, we create a computer that is fully sentient. It is aware of itself and its own existence. It has emotions and creativity. Would it have rights?
/r/MensRights09/03/14 09:55 PM
20

Does a set of genetic instructions have rights?
/r/MensRights09/03/14 09:33 PM
5

Zooming in doesn't help if the resolution and image quality are bad to begin with.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 07:48 PM
3

Probably some teen version of AA where they don't know what he did to get in, and probably don't care.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 02:24 AM
3

They may think it's a bad thing, but they are horrible at recognising when they are doing it.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 02:04 AM
5

Downvoted when I hit the word "stoopid" and didn't bother reading any further.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 02:00 PM
1

it sort of dawned on me that rape truly is nothing more than a social construct. Property is just a social construct. Should theft be decriminalized? Hell, for that matter, crime is just a social construct. But society still needs to protect itself.
/r/MensRights16/02/14 04:12 AM
1

I keep saying it. What I hate about feminism is that it isn't capable of seeing individuals. It only sees demographics.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 05:54 PM
1

How about "Amazon Mom & Dad"
/r/MensRights14/02/14 05:24 PM
4

That makes it sound like they're spies.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 05:24 PM
1

Anyone else think this will lead to tokenism?
/r/MensRights10/02/14 01:23 AM
1

Was there supposed to be a link?
/r/MensRights07/02/14 06:12 PM
86

When it comes to any individual hearing someone say that they should be killed because of the demographic they were born into, historical and cultural context is absolutely fucking irrelevant.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 05:25 PM
1

Yes
/r/MensRights31/01/14 12:21 AM
15

I would like to see these actual go to trial rather than settle. Lets set some legal precedents.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 07:01 PM
4

Are there businesses that specify that it's only against policy for male employees and consultants to harass?
/r/MensRights29/01/14 09:53 PM
2

Context?
/r/MensRights29/01/14 03:02 AM
-2

I couldn't care less about being able to post there. I love you for using the correct word, there. Upvoted.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 03:37 AM
2

You really like to read whatever bullshit you want into the things you see, don't you? Left to evolve on its own, of course social structures will follow biology. But we have the capacity to find better ways than what biology blindly dictates. We are capable of rebelling against our own DNA when it becomes obvious that the evolutionary necessity of the past no longer works in a changing world.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 03:16 AM
2

Better ways than always treating a woman's life as more important than a man's no matter what the current population growth status is. The simple fact is that, right now, we need to population to go down, not up. Since you think human behavior aught to follow biology in all things, you might want to do that by increasing the death rate. Some of us who actually value human life and dignity prefer decreasing the birth rate. You want evolution? Evolution means being able to adapt to different circu…
/r/MensRights27/01/14 05:41 PM
2

Nice. Now try reading past the first line.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 05:20 PM
5

If it were biological fact and programming, then how could anyone be disputing it? The worst thing you can do with evolutionary theory is to try to use it to prescribe a type of behavior. Evolution works by whatever works "well enough" at the moment, not even what works "best". It does not "know" how to make a species invulnerable and sometimes points in a direction that isn't as efficient, but is merely easier to attain. We are more than the sum of our evolutionary history. We are able think an…
/r/MensRights27/01/14 05:13 PM
9

Children, I will grant you. Not women. We are all adults and we are not in any danger of going extinct through underpopulation. If some kind of catastrophe like you describe did strike, and we needed to drastically increase our numbers again, then yes; I can see the need of reverting back to those archaic values. Right now, there is no need for them and they do more harm than good.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 04:54 PM
26

The fact that 5 men can impregnate 100 women does not mean that men were not specifically instructed through social indoctrination that it was their duty as men to sacrifice their lives to ensure that women lived. And they were.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 04:36 PM
20

My point is that in those days, even more than today, it was ingrained into men that it was their duty to put their life on the line to defend women. I'm talking about social indoctrination.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 03:39 PM
3

The first picture, maybe.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 03:17 PM
6

Also, that isn't possible.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 01:05 AM
1

I hear women talk about how “hard” it is to raise kids and manage a household all the time. I never hear men talk about this. This is probably because men are conditioned to never complain about antrying, no matter how hard it is. Kind of like what this woman wants to do to women.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 05:54 PM
4

Not when it's just one person holding that demented view, it isn't.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 03:29 PM
19

The comments are great. Most are disgusted with the woman. There are a couple that say that women can't rape men, and they immediately get told off.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 03:36 PM
4

My point is that she didn't realize what was happening to all those other men, or thought the stories were gross exaggerations. It was only when it happened to her son that she was able to take an honest look at the situation. You can't have empathy for something you don't know or believe is happening.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 07:04 PM
5

And you think that she still doesn't care about anyone else other than her own son? You think that it isn't the case that it took her her son being victimized to alert her to the horrible situation that thousands of men are in?
/r/MensRights15/01/14 06:17 PM
20

So you refuse to accept former radfem activists that now realize that they were wrong?
/r/MensRights15/01/14 05:15 PM
2

They missed Ada Lovelace, creator of the first programming language.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 08:26 PM
3

When True Scotsman fallacies are used like this, they should be referred to as "Twue" <whatever it is> I don't care about twue feminism. I care about how feminism gets practiced in the real world.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 04:02 AM
3

Why should rabbis be accepted as experts on what would or would not cause "serious psychological damage"?
/r/MensRights10/01/14 03:56 AM
3

I probably should have looked at his history. Thanks.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 07:57 PM
17

We're making progress. They used to claim that men didn't face any disadvantages at all. I make no claims about whether mens' or womens' disadvantages are worse. The only claim I make is that mens' disadvantages are bad enough to be addressed.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 07:54 PM
3

I want to use this opportunity to coin the term femsplaining You're a bit late. I've seen it used in several places before.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 07:51 PM
1

I don't agree with your position, but banning you is completely outrageous. If someone has a problem with what you say, they should rebut you, not kick you out of the subreddit. EDIT: Never mind. OP was being an asshole.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 06:58 PM
5

Let me get this straight. This meeting is open to transgender, genderqueer, and all other manner of people who have decided to define themselves as they see fit rather than limiting their options to the binary ones that society gives them... Yet, the organizers have taken it upon themselves to define and limit the categories that everyone else is allowed to put themselves into.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 06:37 PM
6

They read too hard into it by looking at the actual intended meaning?
/r/MensRights09/01/14 06:02 PM
11

Real men ignore people who try to tell them what real men do.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 04:35 PM
22

Women can get orgasms from being raped, and that doesn't make them any less of an unwilling victim. They almost always feel ashamed of the fact afterward. For as much as radfems like to talk about rape, they seem to understand almost nothing about it.
/r/MensRights03/01/14 06:57 PM
1

Feminism is however it is practiced by people who call themselves feminists.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 08:14 PM
4

It really saddens me that you got downvoted so much. It's like the people here don't want to be taken seriously.
/r/MensRights26/12/13 06:48 PM
1

That's probably because you have the cookies on your browser have the site display just the image. Try clicking on that link from another machine. This one seems to work properly. http://www.comingsoon.net/imageGallery/The_Other_Woman/The_Other_Woman_1.jpg
/r/MensRights20/12/13 05:37 PM
2

Link goes to the main page of the site
/r/MensRights20/12/13 04:21 PM
4

I've heard of lesbians who consider any kind of vaginal insertion to be rape, even another woman's finger.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 05:07 AM
3

What were the responses?
/r/MensRights17/12/13 12:46 PM
4

I don't know what Rush actually believes about women, but he'll say anything to get himself ratings and further entrench himself into the minds of his followers.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 10:14 PM
2

I do live in the US and I'm talking about States that are passing regulations specifically designed to drive abortion clinics out of business. They know they can't make laws opposing RvW so they're trying to do an end run around it. Also, abortion rights groups are quite frankly scared to sue because they have no idea if the current Supreme Court would overturn RvW or not.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 01:40 PM
4

The war on Roe v Wade that is going on in many parts of the country. It's true and unfortunate that there are places where women's full range of reproductive freedom is being infringed upon. Of course, this ignores the fact that there isn't anywhere in the country where men have any reproductive freedom at all.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 06:02 AM
1

That's better than some places where they are required by law to arrest the guy, no matter what. (Google "primary aggressor laws")
/r/MensRights10/12/13 01:28 AM
3

I thought it was just a badly-written law about kids witnessing violence.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 08:14 PM
6

Misleading headline. They were both arrested. The article doesn't give any reason why he would be arrested, though. Also, an additional charge for violence in front of an 8-week old baby? Are they serious?
/r/MensRights09/12/13 07:50 PM
3

Wouldn't D be considered victim shaming? Why do they need to be aware? The dangerous situation needs to not be there.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 05:39 PM
10

Reddit is not the entirety of the internet.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 09:42 PM
15

There is the fact that Daniel had to talk Mr Miyagi into teaching him.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 02:02 PM
1

Also the child rape and the protection of the perpetrators thereof.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 04:15 AM
4

It's very simple. You don't get to unilaterally decide that someone else does not suffer discrimination, especially without listening to what they have to say.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 05:57 PM
28

In the US, yes. I think these are the world-wide numbers.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 03:05 PM
2

Just downvote him and move on.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 09:10 PM
3

I haven't actually watched that video, but apparently he's talking about getting society to stop looking at white people as part of a "white race". And yes, I think that's an impossible idea unless you get rid of the whole concept of race, which is not a horrible suggestion.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 12:06 PM
2

He's talking about the idea of a "white race", not white people specifically.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 11:57 AM
2

He'd do better if, instead of focusing on just the "white race", he talked more about abolishing the idea of race in general. It's not really possible to do the one without the other, anyway. I do think humanity would be better off without a concept of "race", anyway.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 11:53 AM
3

Was this the case where the guy knew the lesbian couple was and actually acting in a caregiver role? I'm not saying that should invalidate the contract, but if it is, it wouldn't affect the majority of sperm donor cases which are done anonymously.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 04:00 PM
1

I don't think he's saying that there is anything sinister behind it. He's saying that it's still coming from a position of pro-women bias. "Sinister" would imply that it's deliberate. I'm not saying I agree with him, just that you may have misinterpreted what he said.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 04:09 PM
0

The comment does seem paranoid and defensive, but I'm not sure what your comment has to do with it unless they're the ones running this campaign.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 04:04 PM
4

Yeah. We have no idea what part of men's bodies she likes to look at.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 04:00 PM
1

You'd have a point if it weren't for just two hours out of the entire week. It would be wrong if the entire schedule were segregated.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 03:03 PM
6

Adults should be able to do whatever they want to their own bodies, but no one should be allowed to perform a permenant body modification on a child that is incapable of giving informed consent.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 12:20 PM
-2

I'm not talking about the administrators, I'm talking about the people putting the policies in place for the administrators to follow.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 08:20 PM
1

I'm aware of that. We need completely different campaigns that don't use these ham-fisted methods.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 07:59 PM
1

Please see my response to another of your comments where I said that anti-bullying campaigns need to be done the right way.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 07:52 PM
3

When I was a kid, some other student that I didn't even know grabbed me and threw me to the floor and started punching me in the face. I spent the following two days in the hospital because it blew out the back of my eye socket. I was suspended for those two days. There was another incident where I walked out of a classroom, and before I even knew what was happening, I was the recipient of a roundhouse kick to the face. I was suspended for that, too. I repeat: Fuck. You.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 07:10 PM
3

Then let me rephrase. We need to have anti-bullying campaigns and laws, but they need to be done the right way. They need to be done intelligently and with foresight.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 06:02 PM
3

If the administrators aren't doing their jobs, then the goddamn federal government needs to make them. They need a fire lit under them, because they are too busy cowering behind zero tolerance policies to be willing to use any kind rational judgement in their jobs.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 05:49 PM
2

You don't even have to arrest the bully, just remove them. More often than not, not only is absolutely jack shit done about it, but bullying victims that attempt to defend themselves will be punished by the administration.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 05:44 PM
0

The role of the government is not to enforce morality. Correct. The government has several roles, one of which is to protect its citizens, no matter what age. An adult would be arrested for doing the same shit that kids do to other kids. Why aren't kids protected that same way?
/r/MensRights21/11/13 05:30 PM
-6

As someone who was relentlessly bullied throughout childhood, I have to say, fuck you, you evil piece of shit.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 04:41 PM
22

a small but growing number of feminists are asking: Shouldn’t men, too, be allowed to opt out of parenthood? I am not remotely surprised that they are giving feminists credit for the idea. Sickened, but not surprised. Kind of how like churches today like to claim that Christianity was at the forefront of the abolitionist movement.
/r/MensRights10/11/13 12:50 AM
3

Show me the evidence for this, please.
/r/MensRights08/11/13 06:41 PM
1

I'm only advising him on a course congruent with his beliefs. You're talking to the same guy. Yes. An internet forum is not going to be the place where change happens. It might be where organization happens, but it needs to move out into the real world. In meatspace. What is it that you don't get about that? Please point out exactly where I ever said anything that might be construed as feminist. And knock it the fuck off with the passive aggressive bullshit. Talk like an adult, not an angst-ridd…
/r/MensRights07/11/13 04:15 PM
-1

What the fuck is your problem? Someone suggests that we could do things better than we currently are and you automatically declare them the enemy? Grow the fuck up. I don't know if MRAs are ineffectual or not. But if they are, people like YOU are the reason.
/r/MensRights07/11/13 03:56 PM
2

How about real activism and lobbying?
/r/MensRights07/11/13 03:08 PM
1

Doesn't it also make women pay for penile reattachment surgery?
/r/MensRights06/11/13 07:09 PM
0

Not per hour, you don't.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 02:46 AM
1

True. Words can mean different things to different people. Some people the call themselves feminists want genuine equality, some want female supremacy. No doubt there are some people who define themselves as MRAs who use it as a cover for their own misogyny. That doesn't alter the fact that it's a bad idea to take a philosophy that claims to be about sexual equality and name it after just one sex. That will only guarantee that, for some people at least, it will be solely about the sex that it's …
/r/MensRights27/10/13 07:26 AM
32

I don't actually identify as an MRA. The fact that I subscribe to this subreddit to get news that is of interest to me is beside the point.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 05:11 PM
1

Did you read the next sentence?
/r/MensRights26/10/13 04:55 PM
10

Is feminism fighting for equality, though? It used to. Or maybe it just used to appear to back when women didn't have anywhere to go except towards equality in any area.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 01:44 PM
8

That happens on every submission in this subreddit. Crappy shit has happened in the past so they like to record everything.
/r/MensRights26/10/13 01:28 PM
45

Why call yourself a feminist at all? The name itself implies that it values females over males. Why not call yourself something more gender neutral, like an egalitarian, while maintaining the same beliefs that you already do?
/r/MensRights26/10/13 01:26 PM
4

I don't know, but I notice women weren't asked that question.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 04:26 AM
2

...
/r/MensRights12/10/13 07:29 AM
1

And use one of those programs that overwrites the hard drive space 100 times with zeros to make sure the FBI can't recover the data.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 09:38 PM
36

If it had been a 15 year old girl, the most that the principal would have talked about would be getting her counseling. Also, her name would have for damn sure never have been released to the public.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 11:56 AM
0

I'm not being obtuse. I just want people to think about whether their arguments and statements make sense (which you aren't). The point is that not everyone who is anti-feminist is pro-equality.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 10:42 PM
0

That's why I don't really identify as an MRA, but rather an egalitarian.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 08:58 PM
-6

So male supremacists are pro-equality? Edit: Wait. Do people think I'm calling MRAs male supremacists? Because I'm not.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 08:57 PM
2

The pic isn't a question, but his title there is.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 03:12 PM
3

Did anyone ever find out WHY they say it needs to include power? Because they combine it with the lie that women have no power to completely exempt women from being called sexist.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 04:41 AM
1

Nice, but you should check your spelling on the image.
/r/MensRights26/09/13 02:33 AM
2

How about some context for people who have no idea what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 01:28 AM
13

If women are allowed to walk away with no responsibilities, then why can't men?
/r/MensRights20/09/13 12:20 AM
2

Being an MRA doesn't mean that you automatically assume that every instance of a man getting the short end of the stick automatically implies misandry. That's the way radfems think. Occasionally one parent is better for the kid than the other. Sometimes it's the mother, sometimes it's the father.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 10:27 PM
3

Not everyone has a rosy view of church.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 10:21 PM
3

Holy crap! Did you even read her post? Jeeze! Not every woman out there is the enemy.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 10:20 PM
1

Yet be honest, religion was the issue you raised here on Reddit. Religion was the issue she raised in /r/atheism. That's the only pertinent issue in that particular subreddit. so you can't expect us to accept the word of this man's extremely hostile ex She already said in the original thread that she wouldn't feel right keeping her daughter and ex away from each other. How is that extremely hostile? Doesn't he deserve the same right you have, the right to teach his daughter what he believes is r…
/r/MensRights15/09/13 10:11 PM
1

:) Don't take it personally. There is actual misandry out there, but people here get so jaded from seeing so much of it gathered in one place that they end up inventing problems where they don't exist. It happens in a lot of subreddits.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 10:05 PM
13

Dude, read the next paragrah. She's trying to be accomodating and honestly doesn't know what to do.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 07:29 PM
31

There are people who say that it is rape to have sex with a woman who has has even one sip of alcohol.
/r/MensRights15/09/13 01:14 PM
2

From what I understand, they aren't eliminating gender specific pronouns. The gender neutral pronouns are to be used in cases where the gender is unknown or irrelevant.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 12:36 PM
5

What if you refuse to sign it?
/r/MensRights20/08/13 11:42 AM
3

I got gold for pointing out that Satanists don't actually worship Satan.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 12:44 PM
1

Which doesn't include a lot of journalists or people in mainstream society.
/r/MensRights16/08/13 05:29 PM
1

That means different things to different people. How high a yearly income are you talking about, roughly?
/r/MensRights16/08/13 05:20 PM
3

Would you like to define exactly what makes someone class privileged?
/r/MensRights16/08/13 05:01 PM
0

I figured out that it was role-reversal satire in the first couple paragraphs.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 04:25 PM
-2

Then you need to keep reading the article.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 04:21 PM
2

Comment edited
/r/MensRights23/07/13 06:06 PM
1

Men aren't allowed to back out now, when abortion is legal.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 06:05 PM
3

On average, sure. But we aren't talking about average people. There's all kinds of variety within a population.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 05:41 PM
4

True. As I said elsewhere, I am against them lowering the standards. I was just pointing out the argument given in the article. Although someone in this thread with personal experience in this sort of training said that it doesn't go far enough and the standards should actually be raised.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 04:50 PM
3

I defer to your experience, then.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 04:26 PM
12

I think there could absolutely be women who could do it. Very few women, but frankly there's very few men that could do it, either. I haven't even seen what they go through and I probably definitely couldn't handle it.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 03:08 PM
3

I hate to say it, but it might be easier to have sexually segregated teams (still without lowering any standards). If they find individual men and women that won't have a problem working, go ahead and put them on the same team. Just make sure first.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 02:55 PM
11

Yes, and personally I don't think they should lower the standards, but they should still accept any women who can meet the current standards.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 02:45 PM
5

They are saying that modern combat doesn't actually require the standards that they are currently pushing for.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 02:38 PM
14

No one is stopping women from stepping forward to speak.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 02:37 AM
1

That was my point.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 10:29 PM
1

In this case women aren't actually the product, they're the advertizing.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 04:03 PM
1

You think that minimum sentencing laws are the only thing keeping judges from taking bribes left and right? Judges still go to jail for taking bribes, you know.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 01:30 PM
53

Which is why all mandatory/minimum sentencing laws should be banned. Just let the judges do their frigging jobs. Legislators do not understand future potential cases better than the judges that will be presiding over them.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 09:13 PM
2

It's a whiteboard.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 01:52 PM
8

Only if you take it completely literally with zero critical analysis Translation: Only if you actually read what the sign says and are incapable of reading her mind.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 01:30 PM
3

I think you mean the girl in the picture, not the OP
/r/MensRights17/07/13 01:23 PM
7

One hispanic, everyone else was white.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 12:20 PM
3

The reversal before age 23 is interesting. I wonder why younger people who make more money get fewer messages. Fear that they might be a drug dealer or something? Assumption that the reported income is just a lie? What's going on with 50 year olds that make 100k?
/r/MensRights11/07/13 05:01 PM
2

Hey! NSFW that thing!
/r/MensRights10/07/13 08:13 PM
2

It exists, and it's important enough to be addressed. No comparison with female oppression is necessary.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 12:13 PM
0

Umm, seriously? There are guys in this country being forced to pay child support for kids that they can actually prove are not theirs. The court doesn't give a damn.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 05:22 PM
19

The fact that it's her body should carry some weight. If she flat-out doesn't want to be pregnant, no one should be able to force her to carry the fetus to term. If, however, she wants to have the baby and he doesn't, he should have some way out that doesn't involve 18 years of indentured servitude.
/r/MensRights07/07/13 04:25 PM
0

My point was that Americans seemed to be the only ones not doing it.
/r/MensRights06/07/13 05:31 AM
-6

Noted, and changed. Thank you.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 03:08 PM
67

I've done the experiment myself. Although it wasn't a whole frog, just the legs. And it was oil, not water. There was also flour and salt involved.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 01:50 PM
36

When you throw a frog into a boiling pot of water, it will hop right out. But slowly turn the heat up, and it will die. For the record, this isn't actually true. Turn the heat up slowly, and the frog will jump out when it gets too uncomfortable. TYL that frogs are smarter than humans Americans. Edit: changed the last line to account for a below observation.
/r/MensRights05/07/13 01:34 PM
3

How did that conversation go? If it was online, can you post it?
/r/MensRights01/07/13 11:13 AM
21

Cases like this show us that fatherhood is not tied into whether or not you had sex with a woman, but that your genetic material is part of the child's. Sometimes it's not even tied to that. There are plenty of cases of men being forced to pay child support for kids that they can prove aren't biologically theirs.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 03:23 PM
3

Please post things like this in /r/mrmemes. Let's please keep /r/MensRights for discussion and articles.
/r/MensRights27/06/13 02:55 PM
1

Do they accuse her of kidnapping the child, and then they call the police? Didn't think so.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 11:14 PM
12

Depending on where you live, like the south or midwest, it could be a lot.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 11:05 PM
15

A man would not be doing women a favor by trying to be blind to gender roles by telling her that she can lift that heavy thing by herself because most guys can do it. Then I would expect her to ask for help just like I would expect a less muscular man to. Some men can lift it, some can't. Some women can lift it, some can't. The fact that more men than women on average would be able to lift it shouldn't affect what you should do on an individual basis.
/r/MensRights26/06/13 10:59 PM
4

You might be underestimating the number of brain damaged sociology professors out there.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 10:56 PM
0

Not that similar, since this woman didn't seem to be trying to finger any particular guy for it.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 11:01 AM
4

True. No word is inherently offensive. It's just what different groups of people have decided that they are offended by.
/r/MensRights25/06/13 01:20 AM
5

How is transsexual offensive while transgender is not?
/r/MensRights24/06/13 08:58 PM
0

If this shit keeps going on, sooner or later someone's going to get shot. With all the reports the article talks about, I'm shocked it hasn't happened already.
/r/MensRights24/06/13 03:27 PM
27

How common is it for women to be advised by their lawyer to get a restraining order for no reason other than to make her look victimized?
/r/MensRights23/06/13 04:11 PM
2

That would have been my next guess.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 05:52 AM
1

Lives in either New York or LA.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 05:31 AM
4

Some don't. Some use the word themselves.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 12:34 AM
5

It sounds more like radfems pissed that he didn't automatically think of transsexuals.
/r/MensRights22/06/13 12:22 AM
2

I do not consider myself qualified to answer those questions.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 08:52 PM
0

I think each state runs its own list, and a lot of them do have different levels. That first example shouldn't be on the list at all. If we're going to have a list (which I don't think we should), it should only be for real sexual predators. There are people who have gotten on the sex offender list for taking a piss in the bushes.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 08:48 PM
0

Yes. At least banned from high school and lower. I'd be fine with her teaching college.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 08:47 PM
0

At that point, labor can probably be induced.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 08:46 PM
2

Registering as a sex offender is more harsh than prison, imo. With the sex offender list, there are restrictions on where you can live and work for the rest of your life. Florida had a problem a few years back where there was no where in the entire state where people on the sex offender registry could legally live.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 08:35 PM
17

In all fairness, the book was disgusting, and they are a private organization that can set their own rules.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 08:32 PM
7

No. No woman should ever be forced to carry a child to term against her will. It's her body, and until the fetus/baby leaves, one way or another, she has final authority over what happens. Now, things could change when the technology develops to the point where the fetus could be safely removed and put in an artificial womb until it develops to viability, but that would throw a big fat monkey wrench into the abortion debate, anyway.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 08:25 PM
9

Yes, but if the student is of legal age, she shouldn't go to jail or register as a sex offender. She should just lose her job.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 08:05 PM
7

She shouldn't have gone to jail at all. 16 is the New Jersey age of consent.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 07:05 PM
27

It's also the law that's bullshit. If he is of legal age, then she should be fired, but she shouldn't go to prison.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 07:05 PM
3

What groups, specifically, lobbied for that?
/r/MensRights21/06/13 01:17 PM
1

Every generation can't be kept quiet when it's young.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 12:03 PM
4

And she assumed that all rape victims are women.
/r/MensRights21/06/13 11:57 AM
1

And I knew a nice Diamond. She was a middle-aged asian woman.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 07:06 PM
23

You should have listed why they are prominent for all of them.
/r/MensRights20/06/13 11:44 AM
1

A lot of those stories are about guys.
/r/MensRights19/06/13 05:12 AM
1

I make a distinction between democrats and liberals. The fact is that the republicans have succeeded in dragging the entire political landscape to the right. There are only a couple actual liberals in Congress right now.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 08:16 PM
-2

Because the spying on americans "to protect us" seems like a conservative idea to me.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 03:14 PM
1

Why would that make you more centrist? Is you're against the spying, shouldn't that harden your liberal ideals?
/r/MensRights15/06/13 05:55 AM
3

Independent. I'm fairly liberal. I'm in favor of gay marriage, abortion rights and ending the drug war, even though I'm straight and have never done an illegal drug in my life. I think that the republicans are psychotic but the democrats aren't any prize either, and I view Obama as a corporate sellout. I voted for him in 2008, but I voted 3rd party last year.
/r/MensRights15/06/13 05:36 AM
0

I can't tell if you're joking or not. If you aren't: Dude, please. Complain about what radfems are actually doing all you want, but don't complain about scientific findings unless you can actually show fault with their methodology.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 04:26 PM
2

I don't know. I can see a woman who wants an abortion for those reasons early in the pregnancy getting stonewalled for 24 weeks by an anti-abortion government. Especially in the midwest states that are trying to do an end run around Roe vs Wade by making it impossible for abortion clinics to even do business. I don't consider viability to be important, anyway. What's important is brain development.
/r/MensRights14/06/13 04:10 PM
1

You realize they were trying to make a point about how ludicrous the abortion ban is, right?
/r/MensRights14/06/13 04:06 PM
3

It's wikipedia. Did you try changing it?
/r/MensRights14/06/13 04:03 PM
-4

Why are you being downvoted for suggesting that men and women are in the same boat?
/r/MensRights14/06/13 10:50 AM
2

Speaking as a geek and IT professional, I would love it if more women got into IT and hard sciences. Unfortunately, they don't seem to want to.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 08:36 PM
1

Sorry, I misread your initial comment. It sounded like you were talking about the adopting parents getting financial assistance. My mistake.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 03:44 PM
1

No, the adoptive parents shouldn't receive any financial assistance, because they are choosing to adopt the child. One of the main reasons to put a kid up for adoption is because you can't afford to raise it.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 03:13 PM
5

That's why I feel the man should pay for at least half the cost of the abortion, if she decides to get one.
/r/MensRights13/06/13 11:44 AM
75

Welcome to the club. I got banned from there the first day it opened. What you need to understand is that feminism is not pro-equality. In fact, it's not even pro-woman. It's only pro-feminism. It exists only to perpetuate itself. You see, one of the cornerstones of feminist "theory" is that women are always victimized (and more victimized than anyone else) in any situation. If women actually started becoming socially equal (which they have) that would mean that feminism would have less of a rea…
/r/MensRights12/06/13 08:22 PM
3

Read the full quote. He's saying that your math is bad if you think 77 cents on the dollar is close to equal. He's right. It would be completely unfair if there actually was a gender wage gap of 77 cents on the dollar.
/r/MensRights11/06/13 07:59 PM
18

This post is so getting saved so I can come back and pull that quote the next time I see someone using the term "mansplaining".
/r/MensRights11/06/13 05:58 PM
13

It's called "garnished wages". It gets taken out of his paycheck before he sees it.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 09:23 PM
11

Which "Rick" is also short for.
/r/MensRights10/06/13 09:21 PM
1

Posts containing the word "patriarchy" should be deleted even though feminists commonly use the word?
/r/MensRights09/06/13 03:42 PM
7

She needs to learn what coercion means. Coercion is active. There is necessarily intent behind it. If it takes place entirely in her head, it's not coercion. By her definition, anyone who shows sexual interest in her is automatically coercing her.
/r/MensRights08/06/13 12:28 AM
4

Yeah, that is better.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 11:13 AM
2

What is that supposed to be a picture of?
/r/MensRights07/06/13 10:50 AM
3

If it were me designing the sign, I would have said "Real men can get raped"
/r/MensRights07/06/13 10:49 AM
17

Yeah, it's just the wording that might throw some people.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 10:48 AM
5

Your ideas about leadership come from the classic women=good, men=bad philosophy. No they don't. You're the one associating the "helping everyone get along" method of leadership with women. No one else is claiming that style of leadership is woman-centric.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 01:30 PM
15

Women should have exactly the amount of positions that they are the best qualified for. No more, no less.
/r/MensRights04/06/13 03:25 AM
3

"It's beginning to look a lot like Christmas" The original song writers used to reinforce harmful gender stereotypes in childrens toys. (The song mentions a gun for boys and dolls for girls) Continuing to segregate and advertise toys based on gender just works to perpetuate those nasty sexist steroetypes. Also, "Run, Run, Rudolph"
/r/MensRights03/06/13 01:29 PM
11

No, it isn't. It's because of differing ideas of what respect actually is. Even people who say that respect must be earned agree that people are entitled to a certain initial level of courtesy and/or benefit of the doubt. They are defining respect as a way that you feel towards someone because of what kind of person that they are, something that you can't have until you learn something about them, rather than merely a way to act outwardly towards someone.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 01:58 PM
2

He means the original billboard, without the son/women crossed out and replaced. He's saying that it looks like the phrase "Teach your son to respect women" was, in fact, photoshopped into the sign in the first place.
/r/MensRights02/06/13 01:52 PM
17

Recognizing actual misogyny doesn't make some someone a White Knight.
/r/MensRights01/06/13 08:55 PM
1

She got them at Target
/r/MensRights01/06/13 12:01 AM
1

There's a "save" button at the top of the page under the title.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 08:17 PM
1

I don't even find high heels sexy.
/r/MensRights31/05/13 05:13 PM
-1

My girlfriend is a larger size and she has these adhesive silicone shields that she wears. Wouldn't those help?
/r/MensRights31/05/13 05:12 PM
1

I don't see him drawing any conclusion.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 12:46 PM
1

On the contrary. I love seeing a rational challenge to a baseless assertion.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 12:01 PM
0

It's not the actual "X-men". Half the Marvel heroes are in at least 2 or 3 teams.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 11:59 AM
3

A bill trying to make changes last session died before getting to a vote I think this bit is important. They were trying to change the law before all this happened.
/r/MensRights30/05/13 05:53 AM
3

I have no problem with women on campus setting up a "women only" area, given two conditions: 1, they are creating a new area and not taking a previously coed area and cutting off men's access to it 2, they don't actively fight against the establishment of an equivalent "men only" area (which the reverse of condition 1 would apply to).
/r/MensRights28/05/13 07:23 PM
1

Did you ask them why white men don't deserve it?
/r/MensRights26/05/13 03:38 AM
1

Please stop doing that. You're making us all look bad.
/r/MensRights26/05/13 03:11 AM
4

I have a female friend who loves Game of Thrones. Personally, I can take it or leave it.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 07:30 PM
8

I always like to see when radfems show their true colors.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 07:19 PM
1

Check your privilege = Choose to not be born a white male
/r/MensRights25/05/13 03:17 PM
1

I'm glad I don't have a twitter account so I'm not tempted to get into a screaming match with those idiots.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 03:15 PM
8

The article is from 2006. Has there ever been a response from the feminist community about it?
/r/MensRights25/05/13 03:12 PM
4

That's a mistranslation. It says "before" not "instead of" Beards are significant because muslim men aren't supposed to shave their beards.
/r/MensRights25/05/13 01:40 PM
1

Maybe it's because I'm tired, but I can't figure out what it is that you're satirizing.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 07:48 PM
8

Yes, because every time that happens, it is a deliberate act of manipulation, and can never possibly be because she's insecure and scared.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 05:04 PM
1

I was watching some coverage of this story on Current TV tonight, and they made a point of saying that bringing the charges would be wrong regardless of whether it was a guy or a girl in that situation.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 05:00 AM
9

Am I the only person in this subreddit who thinks that the charges against her are ridiculous? Just like they would be if she were a guy.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 01:25 AM
3

At least she wasn't fingering a specific guy, trying to destroy his life. Because of that, this just makes me sad and embarrassed for the human race instead of enraged.
/r/MensRights15/05/13 05:48 PM
9

Yeah, I think that falls under "don't complain about being looked at".
/r/MensRights14/05/13 02:22 PM
9

I think everyone should be able to wear whatever they want. But if you dress provocatively, don't complain about being looked at. And if you see someone dressing provocatively, be discreet about looking. Don't make a big issue of it.
/r/MensRights14/05/13 01:45 PM
15

The movie needs to include the psychological effects on the boys years down the road. Either as part of the narrative or just an epilogue.
/r/MensRights12/05/13 02:29 PM
8

What do you suggest?
/r/MensRights12/05/13 02:16 PM
4

If he had, and had told the police, he probably would have gotten his phone confiscated.
/r/MensRights28/04/13 01:07 PM
5

There is a unique place for you because you will have seen the issue from both sides. Your input will be highly valued! Welcome!
/r/MensRights27/04/13 02:21 PM
18

He's right. We need to create a place to talk about what we are actually doing about all of this crap. Planning and success stories.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 08:05 PM
1

Was there a response?
/r/MensRights26/04/13 07:57 PM
5

She probably won't, but maybe someone reading the thread will.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 07:54 PM
1

Oh, I thought the comment itself was a response to another comment that detailed what they were talking about.
/r/MensRights26/04/13 02:45 PM
0

What was this in response to?
/r/MensRights26/04/13 03:30 AM
3

Sure, he should be. He wouldn't be, though.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 04:28 PM
48

How about just #ViolenceIsWrong?
/r/MensRights24/04/13 04:46 PM
2

I can't wait till June when the shit hits the fan and they try to hold their convention there without the Centre's permission.
/r/MensRights24/04/13 05:30 AM
15

Then why is it always packed when I'm there?
/r/MensRights22/04/13 07:45 PM
14

Do teenagers not go to the mall any more?
/r/MensRights22/04/13 07:15 PM
11

He's not sending them money. The state is making him reimburse it for the welfare money she is getting.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 10:40 PM
4

Footsoldiers don't always know where their generals are herding them. She didn't get what she wanted, she got what the leaders of the feminist movement wanted.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 11:11 PM
2

You have not plumbed the depths of human stupidity.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 02:38 AM
3

Posted yesterday
/r/MensRights14/04/13 06:23 AM
1

It was the school that said it, as in they didn't pay out as much as 1.5 million.
/r/MensRights13/04/13 04:56 PM
8

She didn't get 1.5m. According to the article, the school said that amount was exaggerated.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 10:44 PM
1

They asked how high you were, and the first thing you sad, before you said that there was nothing wrong with it was "Well a lot". http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1bzf3p/the_joy_of_women_andor_life/c9bjenv?context=1
/r/MensRights10/04/13 03:52 AM
1

Because you said you were high when you made the post.
/r/MensRights10/04/13 03:21 AM
1

Laws need to be based on a system of morals No they don't. It's better for everyone if they are, but its entirely possible for them not to be. ther wise they are nothing but tyrannical edict from whatever political group is in power True, but that doesn't make them something other than laws. There is real moral argument against drugs or drug use. The standard feminist/professional-victim-ists argument against bigotry is, that bigotry leads to oppressive hierarchies, men > women rich > poor etc. …
/r/MensRights10/04/13 02:13 AM
1

No, it would be legal, but it would be wrong according to the commonly agreed on morals of society, assuming that the society hasn't been conditioned to accept anything the king does as moral (as opposed to just outwardly saying it is out of fear). Again, you say it would be illegal. Legality refers to a set of laws. What set of laws are you referring to?
/r/MensRights09/04/13 09:49 PM
1

No, legality isn't necessarily about a system of justice. It can be, but not always. Legality is about what the state will and will not allow. You say that states that don't respect the principle of justice are illegal... illegal by what set of laws?
/r/MensRights09/04/13 08:49 PM
3

Learn what "legal" and "illegal" mean.
/r/MensRights09/04/13 12:38 PM
7

I wouldn't have anywhere near as much of a problem with feminists creating a Satan figure and blaming it for all of the problems in the world as long as they didn't name it after half the world's population. Has it never occurred to them that THAT might be one of the problems we have with them?
/r/MensRights09/04/13 02:11 AM
4

but give him the first three months of pregnancy, or 30 days after he is told about the pregnancy/child (whichever comes later)
/r/MensRights08/04/13 02:12 PM
13

They sound like what feminists think we are.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 01:41 PM
8

I'd alter that. Don't make it an abortion request, but give him the first three months of pregnancy, or 30 days after he is told about the pregnancy/child (whichever comes later) to waive all parental rights and responsibilities.
/r/MensRights08/04/13 01:37 PM
1

No, reverse sexism would be someone discriminating against their own sex.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 05:17 AM
2

Please keep this cheap-shot, no-context crap out of here.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 01:51 PM
3

Yes. Yes it would.
/r/MensRights02/04/13 05:37 AM
3

That's not misdirection. That's you ignoring what he said. Go back up and look at his comment underneath your "Why should I? Do I somehow OWE Feminists consideration or something?"
/r/MensRights02/04/13 01:03 AM
5

Actual feminists? They are both claiming to be feminists. Who has the right to decide that one is a feminist and the other isn't?
/r/MensRights02/04/13 12:59 AM
3

Sounds like someone needs to take her aside and quietly point this out to her.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 11:26 AM
3

Was an explanation given for this?
/r/MensRights01/04/13 11:23 AM
2

Whatever the current situation is, there was definitely a need for a womens rights movement a hundred years ago
/r/MensRights01/04/13 11:22 AM
1

Interesting. Now what are you basing this on other than the one example you linked to?
/r/MensRights01/04/13 04:04 AM
4

You can't even see how big his biceps are. The baby is over top of the one in front.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 04:31 PM
2

The site says it is women who adapt better to change. Did you notice the conditional on that statement? How about we reverse it? "In a society dominated by women, it is men that are most adaptable to change." That would be just as offensive and just as true, wouldn't it? Neither one is a statement about the inherent nature of men or women. It's a statement about the adaptability of human beings compared to how much social power they have. Try this one: "In a society dominated by one group, the d…
/r/MensRights17/03/13 02:35 PM
2

This was sent to me in an email from watchdog.org http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/college-rape-victim-faces-expulsion-speaking-out I do feel that the girl there is being treated unjustly, but watchdog had a problem with the fact that the alleged rapist couldn't be named. I unsubscribed immediately.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 08:28 PM
2

That assumes that no women will refuse to get abortions for ideological reasons.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 12:44 AM
3

Now watch as there's a massive uproar among the parents over it.
/r/MensRights01/03/13 10:05 PM
3

I don't think this person realizes how many guys would absolutely love their wife/girlfriend to be bisexual. And yes, I realize the reverse is also true.
/r/MensRights22/02/13 02:05 AM
8

I don't have a problem with graphic depictions of sex as long as no children are present (people need to relax about that kind of thing), but you're right that the context of the sex is disturbing.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 06:58 AM
1

I completely agree. We must stand in the middle and nail down the pendulum at its lowest point.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 05:57 AM
2

I've seen a few posts here promoting it.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 05:56 AM
1

That's why I think we should identify as egalitarians, not masculinists.
/r/MensRights21/02/13 05:54 AM
2

Hiring shouldn't favor anyone, no matter what your sex, skin color or sexual/political/religious orientation. The only thing that matters is your ability to do the job.
/r/MensRights20/02/13 08:23 PM
1

How is "fewer outlets" a biological fact? I'd call it a social fact. Not that I agree with the "more abusive" thing, either.
/r/MensRights18/02/13 06:09 AM
3

Real life is offensive. The only offensiveness in that picture is that is it pointing out what is offensive about real life.
/r/MensRights17/02/13 01:21 AM
8

Yeah. It was. She wasn't being serious, she was trying to make a point about abortion.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 07:22 PM
14

Here is where that passage originally came from http://thepeoplescube.com/peoples-blog/finally-equal-equality-no-vasectomy-for-you-t8464.html "thousands of children are deprived of birth in this state every year because of a lack of state regulation." What the fucking jumping jesus on a stick? I hope she's being ironic about Georgia attempting to limit abortions.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 06:13 PM
20

Looks like something accidentally got copied and pasted into the text.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 06:10 PM
1

That's interesting. Can you link to the text that says that?
/r/MensRights15/02/13 11:00 PM
1

I'm more looking for laws that specifically hurt men rather than simply protect women more than men. I'm not sure if VAWA applies (I don't even know what it says or does), but family and divorce law certainly does, but that's a huge area. I'm looking for specific laws that feminist groups are on the record as being behind.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 09:00 PM
3

The law in California doesn't allow the judge to end the payments. Can anyone provide information about exactly what the law says and who was pushing for that law?
/r/MensRights15/02/13 06:13 PM
4

Yes, I was implying that. Since hospital mixups happen to both men and women equally, and paternity fraud only happens to men, and there is no such thing as maternity fraud, then by definition men will be raising the wrong child more often than women. I was disagreeing with the claim that women never unknowingly raise the wrong child. When I see a bad argument, I need to correct it, even if the argument is in defense of my side. Excuse me for having intellectual integrity.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 12:47 PM
1

No, I am rebutting ElfmanLV's claim that women will never unknowingly raise a child that isn't theirs. And as usual, with all the lip service that reddit pays to critical thinking, they fly totally off the handle when someone actually practices it.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 12:37 PM
3

I think they are saying that the mother and father have to agree. The mother wouldn't be allowed to do it on her own, either.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 06:16 AM
-8

I wouldn't say never. There's always the case of mixups at the hospital. But by it's very nature men raising the wrong children will be more common since hospital mixups will be a subset of that.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 06:12 AM
1

You might have included some indication of what this pricing is for. That would make it easier to talk about.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 01:16 PM
2

man-hating queers FIFY :P
/r/MensRights12/02/13 10:16 PM
4

Yeah, but it's offensive if they say "cis" if they aren't cis themselves.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 10:14 PM
2

Ok, it enrages me that she thinks it would be funny.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 10:16 PM
8

I assumed that the first thing the person did was make another account. It just enrages me that she did it in the first place.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 10:00 PM
3

At no point did I say anything about "playing nice" with them.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 09:04 PM
2

So you'd rather just sit there making excuses about how we don't have any choice but to use tactics that will never make the problem go away?
/r/MensRights08/02/13 08:31 PM
18

Wait, does she mean banned from all of reddit?
/r/MensRights08/02/13 08:28 PM
4

And the stupid tug-o-war will continue until someone insists on standing in the middle and not playing.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 07:26 PM
47

It isn't synonymous with "gender egalitarianism" (by the same token, "feminism" isn't synonymous with "gender egalitarianism" either). That's my whole point. It's gender egalitarianism that we need to be promoting. Both mens and womens issues should be presented and addressed under that umbrella.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 03:59 PM
264

No, dammit! We can't go that route. We can't start promoting "masculism". We're the ones that are fighting for equality. If we start pushing a purely male philosophy, even in name, then it's just going to be this "us vs them" shit all over again.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 03:37 PM
1

The good news for her is that it won't be too many years now until the sexbots start hitting the market.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 10:50 PM
17

"Their lives will be ruined in many ways," Owen said. Only if you ruin them by treating them like they committed some horrible crime.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 06:20 PM
3

Oh. Never mind. I had just woken up when I posted that.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 02:36 PM
3

Please point out the misogyny, because you're apparently the only one that can see it. Start by defining it.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 12:48 PM
0

You forgot the bit where he puts a 2003 stamp on it.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 12:38 PM
1

Here's an important point that madonna is missing. When a girl cuts her hair short, and wears jeans, shirts and boots, that doesn't mean that they look like a boy.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 06:01 AM
3

The news coverage might have had something to do with it, too.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 02:41 PM
1

So wait, he was opposed to the free speech wall because it gave the opportunity for people to say derogatory things about gays, even though no one actually did?
/r/MensRights24/01/13 04:07 PM
15

Anyone thinking that if cornered, they just might get rid of Selective Service completely rather than require it for women?
/r/MensRights24/01/13 12:51 PM
1

No kidding? I live in Columbia.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 04:08 PM
1

I'd like to know, out of the male victims, how many had female assailants. I'd also like to know what the numbers are like for pre-60 year olds.
/r/MensRights20/01/13 04:07 PM
-3

You say that as if men won't do the same thing. That's not a female failing, that's a human failing.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 07:52 PM
-19

Did you see the part where he threatened to disown the kids unless she signed?
/r/MensRights14/01/13 05:34 PM
2

Polygraphs are garbage, anyway. They shouldn't be used at all, by anyone.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 12:27 PM
48

It is also not an invitation to take half his stuff.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 02:35 PM
24

Btw, "humanist" means something completely different. "Egalitarian" is a better word.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 05:39 AM
1

And probably a non-zero coverage for virgins.
/r/MensRights03/01/13 11:29 PM
16

Well then, you know what he's talking about.
/r/MensRights01/01/13 11:40 PM
5

I don't see how anyone being able to call themselves a feminist necessarily means that there is no banner of feminism.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 01:48 PM
1

Has this been sent to the author of HaV?
/r/MensRights31/12/12 05:07 AM
3

Why would it be feminists' responsibility to criticise people for hating men? Because they are doing it under the banner of feminism?
/r/MensRights31/12/12 05:03 AM
5

They don't want to debate. They want to silence all dissent.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 05:00 AM
2

He doesn't need to argue with the best or worst. He needs to argue with the ones that are negatively affecting us.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 04:59 AM
13

Why should that make a difference?
/r/MensRights29/12/12 04:06 AM
2

I don't know, but go with it.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 10:36 PM
2

You probably mean by the "original" definition or possibly even the "stated" definition. The "correct" definition is determined by "what is".
/r/MensRights28/12/12 06:30 PM
2

There is no "what is supposed to be", there is only "what is".
/r/MensRights28/12/12 06:15 PM
0

I saw that on G+ shortly after the shooting. I commented that it was offensive and sexist. That comment was deleted.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 06:14 PM
8

Good luck, and remember the words of P. C. Hodgell: "That which can be destroyed by the truth, should be." May that which the truth destroys be the emotional wall between you and your wife.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 03:18 PM
7

Yea, but that rate is across the board, even with couples who know each other well. Is it? Do they even measure for a statistic like that? Either way, truth is always better than falsehood (or omission, in your case).
/r/MensRights28/12/12 03:09 PM
4

I think that's a mistake that way too many couples make. It's probably a factor in why there's a 50% divorce rate.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 03:03 PM
11

I'm not sure if she experienced something similar, or if she's just super patient. If this is your life partner, that's something you should find out.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 03:00 PM
60

That is why you need to talk to her about it, because the fact that she doesn't know what happened almost certainly means that she is misinterpreting your inability to be intimate.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 02:50 PM
72

You really should tell her. I'd bet anything that she thinks that you aren't physically attracted to her. Honesty and communication is everything. This is a huge part of your psyche, and she needs to know who she's agreed to spend the rest of her life with.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 02:41 PM
28

Does your wife know?
/r/MensRights28/12/12 12:58 PM
43

No indication of where it came from? I call bullshit/satire.
/r/MensRights28/12/12 06:46 AM
12

Let me rephrase that: 80% of child criminals in the UK are living with their single mothers. Isn't that intersting? I'm sorry, but I need to call you on this point. The majority of child criminals are living with single parents. Now unless we have the figures on what percentage of kids who are living with single fathers are also criminals, that figure doesn't mean anything against single mothers, since we know that the majority of single parents are mothers. I might be an MRA, but I'm also a rat…
/r/MensRights19/12/12 04:19 PM
2

Where did the original definition come from?
/r/MensRights18/12/12 02:50 PM
9

No. Misogyny does exist. We just need to get people to recognize that misandry exists as well. If you want to see an example of misogyny, take a look at any of the republicans in the recent presidential election when the subject rolled around to women.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 02:49 PM
0

That's a bad argument, connecting wages to selective service. Women should be paid as much as men given the type of job, amount of experience, and hours worked.
/r/MensRights17/12/12 11:44 PM
1

The word "egalitarian" already means what you're talking about.
/r/MensRights16/12/12 03:39 AM
5

"Humanist" means something else.
/r/MensRights15/12/12 09:28 AM
3

There are states in the midwest trying to do an end run around Roe v Wade, trying to make it impossible to get an abortion without outright banning it. They know no one will take them to court over it too since everyone is too afraid that the current Supreme Court will rule against abortions.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 11:39 PM
-2

or a racist if you say anything derogatory about black people a black person. FIFY
/r/MensRights13/12/12 09:26 PM
70

If men show any courage or strength, then there is that much less in the finite courage & strength pool for women to use.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:34 PM
30

So, uh, where again is the part where she says that MRAs are the reason men can't get help? Umm... the title and the first sentence? Fuck You, Mens Rights Activists. Fuck you, first of all, for making it nearly impossible for decent men struggling with abusive partners or unfair custody arrangements to get the help they need and deserve.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 08:09 PM
42

No, she specifically names MRAs as the reason men can't get help.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 07:24 PM
1

It's not an ad hominem unless I'm trying to say that you're wrong because you're a moron. Tacking the insult on at the end is perfectly legitimate. I acknowledge your retreat.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 06:53 PM
1

The government debt is there because of the services it provides to people No. It's in debt from so many members of Congress forcing through deals with government contractors that just happen to be based their districts. The amount that it pays out to public services is tiny by comparison. one of the founding blocks of Communism Right. Because the communists invented taxes. It's one of the founding blocks of EVERY CIVILIZATION THAT HAS EVER EXISTED, YOU MORON! You know who else believed that the…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 06:46 PM
31

The Party had a daily "two minute hate".
/r/MensRights13/12/12 06:43 PM
68

You want over here.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 06:42 PM
78

With a good deal of projecting thrown in.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 06:41 PM
557

So she acknowledges that men have issues, but puts the blame for them not being able to get help on any man who actually tries to point out the fact that men have issues.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 06:10 PM
1

But what if I was able to keep my money and purchase the services I need from the free market instead? Do you use public roads? Are you and your property protected by the publicly paid police and fire departments? Even if you went to private school instead of public, do you think that we would have a society that could afford the goods or services you are selling them without public schools? Could they drive to the store to buy your goods without those public roads, or buy them online without an…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 05:38 PM
1

Yes, I can. And I can also see that the source of the confusion, at least about the meaning of the word "liberal", is that Fox "News" has been painting them that way for the past 15 years.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 05:31 PM
0

Because if you are going to live in a society and benefit from its public works (and everyone does, whether you think so or not), then you are obligated to help keep it healthy. Having 10% of the population control 90% of the wealth is NOT healthy. And just so we are in agreement on this point "redistribution of wealth" does not mean making it so that everyone has the same amount of money. It is only the aforementioned psychotic people (a tiny minority) who believe that no one should be allowed …
/r/MensRights13/12/12 04:46 PM
0

No, we just believe that the distribution of wealth should be far less lopsided than it currently is. If the richest people in society can buy whatever laws they want, then the society is broken. Is it really so horrible for the highest paid person in a company to merely make 50 times what the lowest paid person does, rather than the 400 times that we have now? Remember that for a good chunk of the 20th century, the highest tax rate was something like 90%. "Liberal" is not a synonym for "communi…
/r/MensRights13/12/12 04:23 PM
2

Anything that gets popular declines into a circle jerk. A few years ago, everyone on reddit kept reminding each other not to post links to reddit on other sites because we knew what would happen. It didn't work.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 01:45 PM
0

I hate the fact that "liberal" has become an epithet. Not all liberals are psychotic like the ones he is talking about. Also, he lost points for his use of the phrase "real men".
/r/MensRights13/12/12 07:08 AM
2

How about purple?
/r/MensRights13/12/12 07:00 AM
2

What does this have to do with mens rights? At first I thought you might have posted this to the wrong subreddit, then I noticed you shoehorned in the phrase "white knight" with no explanation.
/r/MensRights13/12/12 06:58 AM
6

Plants are alive. Do you mourn when they are killed even though they have no awareness and can feel no pain?
/r/MensRights11/12/12 09:26 PM
2

I don't recall accusing you of lying on this point, or any other for that matter. Binarypillbug asked a question about the statistics. I answered it. You really are eager to fight with anyone, to turn anybody into an ideological enemy, aren't you?
/r/MensRights11/12/12 09:11 PM
2

Don't accuse me of playing verbal tricks when you turn around and play your own. There is obviously a person who is growing in the womb Justify this statement. Start by defining "person". If you said you thought some other human being was not a person, say a bald person, because they do not have hair, does this justify you killing it? Because whether someone has hair or not has nothing to do with whether they are a person. Whether something is a person is absolutely wrapped up in their cognitive…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 09:05 PM
4

Also notice how he managed to work "in cold blood" in there without explaining why it applies. One thing I have never understood about anti-choicers is that they don't seem to get the fact that pro-choicers don't consider abortion to be murder. They act like we agree with them that it is murder, but just don't care.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 08:52 PM
1

According to the World Health Organization, it's 529,000 women every year. http://www.who.int/features/qa/12/en/index.html
/r/MensRights11/12/12 08:48 PM
5

He said "most". I certainly recognize abortion as an exercise in bodily autonomy. During the segment of the pregnancy when abortion is generally permitted, there is no other person involved. There is no other entity or being. A potential being, certainly, but not an actual one. The brain of a fetus during the first 20 weeks of the pregnancy is simply not complex enough to allow for any kind of awareness, and its destruction can not reasonably be called murder.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 08:36 PM
3

Story is from 2009. He was released from the payments a few months later. http://blogs.findlaw.com/law_and_life/2009/08/no-more-child-support-for-freed-childless-man.html
/r/MensRights11/12/12 04:47 PM
1

I need mens rights because I'm rational. As much as I love rationality, I don't know if that's a good one to use. There will probably be two types of reactions to that one. One from people who think you're being elitist and self-important, the other from people who think rationality is a bad thing. Normally I wouldn't give a damn what that second group thinks, but they do make up a huge chunk of the population. If you're trying to change people's minds, you need to consider their reaction to you…
/r/MensRights11/12/12 02:59 PM
2

I think MRA has to build it's own immolation into it's paradigm. I have this image of the swinging pendulum being nailed to the floor at its lowest point.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 02:55 PM
6

Unfortunately, trite memes like this are what get people's attention. The five-second sound bite might be devoid of content and incapable of containing any real solutions, but it's what gets people listening. We might not like playing the victim, but unless we start getting people to see that sometimes we actually are the victim, they will continue in their belief that we have no right to complain about anything.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 02:50 PM
2

The term "egalitarian" is already means what you are talking about. Bonus: it's not just for sexual equality, but racial, religious, sexual orientation, or pretty much anything else you could think of.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 02:43 PM
2

What was Brian saying? Personally, I think that the term "masculanist" is just as dangerous as the word "feminist". If equality is your goal, neither term is going to help.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 02:42 PM
2

Who the hell labels men as red and women as blue on a line chart? Am I the only one that assumed the blue line was supposed to be men at first?
/r/MensRights11/12/12 02:30 PM
22

I'm pretty sure this is sarcasm.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 06:24 PM
2

Are the individual members of SRS that did the doxxing still around?
/r/MensRights09/12/12 05:53 AM
1

That's not "irrational". That's "not doing things our way". Please try to learn the difference.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 09:50 PM
1

Yeah, I occasionally see people here trying to point out that not all feminists try to turn us into the enemy. That's why I finally unsubscribed from r/atheism and subscribed to r/trueatheism.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:31 PM
4

Problem is that it's not the rational, logical feminists that we have an issue with.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:16 PM
1

No prob'
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:14 PM
3

I'm not saying that what she got is sufficient, I'm just pointing out a flaw in nplant's comment.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 06:27 PM
3

I don't think that nazis have official, central leadership anymore. There's a nazi political party, but they don't really lead all the nazis.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 05:51 PM
5

It's the straightforward definitions that you need to watch out for. They make a good shield for the extremists.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 05:08 PM
8

Exactly From what I understand, there are non-reddit MR groups that believe that r/MensRights is a front set up by feminists to dilute the movement.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 05:05 PM
4

Well this is Canada, the justice system here cares much more about rehabilitation than punishment/revenge. Don't approach this case with US standards of justice if you want to understand what's going on. I'm all for that. The question is, do Canadian courts treat men the same way?
/r/MensRights07/12/12 04:58 PM
1

And if you're in prison, who's going to drive them to school? She lost her drivers license for 10 years over this.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 04:56 PM
24

No one, specific person gets to decide what feminism is. Feminism is defined by how it is represented by people who consider themselves to be feminists.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 04:15 PM
22

Any real feminist Yeah, they say specific things about real Scotsmen, too.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 03:53 PM
1

I'm an atheist, and it's pretty hard to tell religious satire too. I didn't even get to the part that you quoted.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 02:12 PM
2

I'm pretty sure this is satire.
/r/MensRights07/12/12 07:11 AM
2

This is awesome, although it does make me sad that only a woman would be accepted as saying something like this. Also, happy cakeday. :)
/r/MensRights07/12/12 06:58 AM
0

"Overview of Mod Policy:" over in the sidebar
/r/MensRights05/12/12 06:01 PM
4

So how many death threats did she receive for saying that?
/r/MensRights05/12/12 12:52 PM
3

Anything that people want to have, be it prostitution, drugs, or whatever else, will exist regardless of whether it is legal or not. Making it illegal only drives it underground, making it unsafe for everyone involved and increasing the amount of crime, including violent crime.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:59 PM
16

Calling it violence only insults the victims of real violence.
/r/MensRights04/12/12 05:56 PM
0

Don't they already have it?
/r/MensRights04/12/12 07:38 AM
6

When have they ever hired the most qualified individual?
/r/MensRights02/12/12 06:33 AM
8

No. Women were perfectly capable of violence before feminism came along.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 06:36 PM
2

Don't blame the Attorney General for this. He didn't have any authorization to release the guy, and neither did the judge. It's the law that was screwed up.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 06:34 PM
2

I feel sorry for what he's been turned into. He's just been ingrained with self-hatred. He needs to learn that, not only are most men fairly decent, but that women are capable of being evil as well.
/r/MensRights29/11/12 06:30 PM
2

You should never be afraid to tell the truth, but more than that, you should never be afraid to question if what you have actually is the truth. Something Ayn Rand should have done.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 05:42 PM
2

When we find a way to bring the fetus to term without using the mother's body (which we are not that far from, actually) then men can protest the abortion. For the record, I'm a guy.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 02:36 AM
3

One of our most beloved regulars here, girlwriteswhat, is female. Check out her youtube channel too.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 12:20 AM
1

As long as she was just bluffing and wouldn't have actually lied to the police, I don't see an issue.
/r/MensRights27/11/12 12:17 AM
5

Oh that's funny. You think that the courts give a damn about the kids. Someone is trying to make money off of the guy (and it's always the guy that has to go through this shit). They either take a percentage off the top of the payments as a "collection fee" or you're fodder for the for-profit prisons.
/r/MensRights26/11/12 02:46 PM
3

I assumed it was, but is Red taking it seriously?
/r/MensRights26/11/12 06:36 AM
6

Unfortunately, a crime is whatever the prevailing legal system says it is.
/r/MensRights23/11/12 03:24 AM
5

I am fortunate to not have this problem, as my live-in SO and I use two different bathrooms. We keep the seat and lid down in both because we have a cat.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 05:14 PM
3

So is "People of faith" and that's on there.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 05:10 PM
1

It's "drivel".
/r/MensRights21/11/12 04:44 PM
7

She should get the abortion if she wants, but she shouldn't lie about it. OP is in a different situation.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 04:06 PM
39

Men are four times as likely as women to be struck by lightning. Why? Because men are four times as likely as women to be out in a lightning storm. Usually doing some kind of work that needs to be done immediately.
/r/MensRights19/11/12 04:32 AM
2

A friend of mine (a psychologist) saw that once at a bdsm club (sub woman, dom guy) and she said she wanted to punch the guy out and give the woman a good talking to.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 11:56 PM
3

Yet women should have the right to go topless in public... because feminism. I also happen to support this.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 11:53 PM
5

Porn aside, there are people, both women and men, who enjoy engaging in tbe submissive side of BDSM, including being whipped and beaten.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 04:25 PM
3

Everyone except in vitro kids.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 03:20 PM
15

There are actually people who believe that any penatrative sex is rape, even a woman finger fucking another woman.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 03:06 PM
24

Also, heterosexual porn isn't porn unless the woman is being degraded somehow.
/r/MensRights17/11/12 01:24 PM
1

I'm all for gender-neutral pronouns, but they should be reserved for hypothetical people who could be male or female, or people whose gender is currently unknown. Also hermaphrodites.
/r/MensRights15/11/12 07:12 PM
11

Yes, and by doing so, they would be following my advice. Seriously, decide for yourself how you're going to live your life. Don't let yourself be dictated to by anyone else, or by society in general.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 06:24 PM
11

Real men ignore people who try to tell them what "real men" do.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 04:33 PM
4

2nd one is satire. See here.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 12:47 AM
0

2nd one is satire. See here.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 12:46 AM
9

2nd one is satire. See here.
/r/MensRights13/11/12 12:46 AM
3

Google "Vasalgel"
/r/MensRights12/11/12 01:10 PM
1

You're an egalitarian. Welcome to the club. :)
/r/MensRights11/11/12 01:21 PM
1

Post a screenshot, please. Not everyone has a facebook account. You should be blocking out the names, anyway.
/r/MensRights11/11/12 05:26 AM
1

The link got kind of screwed up
/r/MensRights10/11/12 03:55 AM
2

Check out the original animated Hobbit movie from the 70s.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 03:49 AM
9

OP said that the teacher said that the 0 was because the paper was untrue.
/r/MensRights10/11/12 02:25 AM
1

Ask her how she would react if you had kicked your wife "not very hard".
/r/MensRights08/11/12 09:34 PM
1

I remember that. He was actually helping to raise the kid while they were together. He still shouldn't have to pay, but it's not like he was some anonymous doner that she tracked down.
/r/MensRights29/10/12 11:46 AM
18

People have posted videos of themselves committing crimes because they wanted to brag about it. Yes. People really are that stupid.
/r/MensRights28/10/12 05:29 AM
2

She's apparently banning people who challenge her about it.
/r/MensRights27/10/12 03:27 PM
3

Maybe we need to start an MCLU for situations like this.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 08:39 PM
6

Yeah, split it 95-5 if he's lucky.
/r/MensRights26/10/12 08:36 PM
1

You don't have to. You only have to do that if you are imposing the system on people against their will. But then, you have to do that if you are imposing any system on people against their will.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 02:48 PM
1

You think that's partisan? I once got called a communist immediately after I stated that I thought communism was not a viable system, but didn't think it was inherently evil.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 01:24 PM
2

The only way to throw your vote away is to not cast it. People need to get away from the idea that they need to vote for someone who is likely to actually get elected, that they need to be on "the winning side". People need to stop treating political parties like sports teams.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 01:20 PM
1

At least the majority of people in the comments understand how wrong this is.
/r/MensRights23/10/12 01:07 AM
1

I meant that it would look fine the first time they saved it. Once they started saving it over and over again, it would start looking like crap.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 05:15 AM
-4

JPG doesn't even have to do that. They could save it at the highest quality and it would look fine.
/r/MensRights22/10/12 04:24 AM
7

She's choosing a stranger to come live with her. Whether you like it or not, whether the person is male or female does actually make a difference in this case.
/r/MensRights18/10/12 01:29 PM
13

There is absolutely nothing wrong with being choosy about who you share your home with. If you were going to rent the place to someone and you weren't going to be living there, that would be a different story, but everyone has a right pick a co-habitant that they are comfortable with. Discrimination is wrong in matters like business and education. It's perfectly allowable when it comes to one's personal life. About all the female-only ads you saw, it's ok to acknowledge that it's not your respon…
/r/MensRights18/10/12 05:47 AM
3

No candidate ever would. A politician might as long as they aren't running for reelection.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 02:26 PM
30

I can. Telling the truth (if they're even aware of the truth) would be political suicide.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 03:22 AM
7

Problem is that atheism is popular enough now that there are plenty of people in it who reject religion for vague "it's oppressive and doesn't make sense" reasons instead of being able to clearly define their reasons, people who are generally not clear thinkers.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 07:03 PM
6

No what? I wasn't asking a question.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 06:55 AM
6

That implies that they owe some kind of allegiance to the male gender in the first place.
/r/MensRights15/10/12 06:42 AM
5

People talk about how men are four times as likely to get struck by lightning, but they never talk about the reason why that's true, sometimes even joking that nature likes women more or that women's biology somehow naturally repells lightning. It's because men are four times as likely to be outside in a lightning storm.
/r/MensRights14/10/12 01:28 PM
3

Watching hentai, no. Owning a hentai pillow, um...
/r/MensRights12/10/12 06:42 PM
1

If you're willing to drop $45, you can find out for yourself
/r/MensRights12/10/12 06:30 PM
3

1970, actually. There are a couple used copies on Amazon.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 06:04 PM
7

Falsely claiming to have been raped doesn't necessarily mean that you are fingering a specific guy and claiming that he did it.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 01:44 PM
1

Did you mean "conservatism"? Because the word you used means to take care of natural resources and environments.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 12:03 PM
5

Except that it doesn't. Responsibility always lies on the man's shoulders regardless of whether it's the man, woman or both that is drunk.
/r/MensRights12/10/12 12:54 AM
2

Is there a way to do that on a non-rooted android?
/r/MensRights11/10/12 01:39 PM
15

It's on the sidebar.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 01:36 PM
3

He was totally inappropriate. The response to a slap should be a slap, not a right cross.
/r/MensRights11/10/12 06:38 AM
2

I think it would be a good idea for Americans to start doing it too.
/r/MensRights10/10/12 12:55 AM
7

I meant that it's not obvious from the title that the article is talking about Australia.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 01:21 PM
16

Can we have new rule here? When the title mentions a high governmental rank, please specify which government.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 11:52 AM
0

That's why I just downvoted him and moved on.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 04:18 AM
3

The media, particularly children's media, has been going out of its way to show girls as more active than traditionally portrayed for a few decades now. I remember cartoons in the 80s doing it.
/r/MensRights08/10/12 02:13 AM
2

What does this have to do with mens rights?
/r/MensRights08/10/12 01:40 AM
2

http://xkcd.com/1027/
/r/MensRights02/10/12 02:11 PM
1

Is he less likely to get one, or are women more likely to request one.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:42 AM
5

Exactly.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:36 AM
1

Well, the first time I even heard of negging was in the xkcd comic.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:36 AM
18

Essentially, their entire business model consists of telling their readers that they aren't good enough, that they can never meet up with the (impossible) standards that Cosmo and its ilk exemplify. So they keep buying the magazine to learn how be more like the (fake) women inside. In fact, the posted story is sort of like negging, in a roundabout way. "What's that? Your morals are getting in the way of being like this strong, independent woman who doesn't take shit from anyone? I guess you'll n…
/r/MensRights02/10/12 06:20 AM
3

Ok, this particular example might not be negging, but a lot of what is in cosmo is negging.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 05:24 AM
9

Negging - it works for keeping your magazine readership, too.
/r/MensRights02/10/12 05:08 AM
2

It's beautiful that people are starting to stand up and take notice. We keep seeing more and more stories about it, especially from women. Hopefully there'll be a spot on a major tv news outlet about discrimination against men sometime soon.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 12:04 AM
17

You should have. In fact, go back now and type that. Report the results back to us.
/r/MensRights25/09/12 04:05 PM
5

Oh, they get all giddy over the prospect of not needing men any more, but technological advancements threaten their importance and they get their panties in a twist?
/r/MensRights24/09/12 02:25 PM
5

Don't most of them use dummy accounts when they start shit in other subreddits, anyway?
/r/MensRights24/09/12 01:18 PM
8

And no one suggested making the women compete in best of five? If they did, what was the reaction?
/r/MensRights23/09/12 01:54 PM
5

You don't have kids, do you?
/r/MensRights23/09/12 01:47 PM
4

Explain the Billie Jean King reference, please? I know she was a tennis player, but that's all I know about her.
/r/MensRights23/09/12 01:41 PM
3

Here you go
/r/MensRights22/09/12 08:13 PM
1

An ex girlfriend of mine once said that I was being violent because, when she was holding my hand and wouldn't let go when I tried to pull away from her, I just yanked my hand out of hers instead.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 07:06 PM
1

From what I can tell, the ACLU never said anything about how the dances should be cancelled, only about how there shouldn't be gender-specific events. It was the school superintendent that decided to cancel the dances.
/r/MensRights21/09/12 07:04 PM
15

Not all the women in the skeptic community approve of the attempted feminist takover.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 03:53 AM
2

http://technorati.com/women/article/radical-new-birth-control-for-men/
/r/MensRights18/09/12 12:40 AM
1

That's why it's in quotes. He's saying that is what feminists claim about the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights18/09/12 12:34 AM
6

Fourth
/r/MensRights18/09/12 12:24 AM
11

5 bags of groceries for $50... 1997 O_o
/r/MensRights17/09/12 11:41 AM
3

Yes, I was being facetious.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 04:11 AM
2

If it was a deliberate lie, maybe. That doesn't seem to be the case here.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 02:56 AM
3

Hey! There's nothing wrong with being gay. Don't align gay people with white supremacists.
/r/MensRights17/09/12 02:54 AM
2

I know. I was just pointing out that you seemed to be referring to that specific post and he wasn't.
/r/MensRights16/09/12 12:27 AM
2

Doesn't matter. He wasn't being a troll in that post.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 10:44 PM
2

I think penultimate was referring to the person's posting history.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 10:43 PM
2

No one should ever be downvoted for asking an honest question.
/r/MensRights15/09/12 10:41 PM
12

Yes. Censorship is the domain of the coward.
/r/MensRights13/09/12 06:12 AM
0

"... he said, unable to explain why it was dumb other than that it contradicted what he believed."
/r/MensRights10/09/12 08:50 PM
0

No it isn't their own fault, because there are plenty of people stupid enough to believe that it actually does apply in every case. How are we supposed to know that you aren't one of them? And your example is bad because penises are part of what defines someone as male. I was talking about personality traits.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 08:28 PM
0

Then you need to phrase it to explicitly say that it doesn't apply in every single case. Otherwise people will (justifiably) assume that you are talking about every case.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 08:16 PM
1

Not all people are like anything. This isn't limited to women. There is no personality trait that you can apply to all men. Why should women be any different? This is nothing more than fear and distrust of the "other".
/r/MensRights10/09/12 08:13 PM
0

If there are exceptions, then the rule is wrong. Generalizations are typically bad things.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 07:57 PM
1

The simple fact is that not all women do that. You can't take any personality trait and apply it to all members of a group that is defined by birth.
/r/MensRights10/09/12 06:24 AM
1

What was the response after you posted that?
/r/MensRights08/09/12 08:24 AM
4

I'd love to, but I'm banned there.
/r/MensRights07/09/12 10:24 PM
2

The club is actually over here.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 04:06 AM
2

I spent the day arguing in /r/atheismplus because I didn't know yet how insanely misandrist it was there. The response wasn't as bad as yours but was still pretty vitriolic. Still got banned.
/r/MensRights06/09/12 04:04 AM
5

Well that was a silly thing to try. You didn't actually believe that there was any possibility of a reasonable response, did you?
/r/MensRights06/09/12 03:54 AM
4

It means someone who isn't transsexual.
/r/MensRights05/09/12 08:20 PM
2

You might want to look here
/r/MensRights31/08/12 04:14 AM
2

I think reverse discrimination would be discriminating against a member of your own group.
/r/MensRights30/08/12 02:53 PM
1

I'm sure it can be replicated in a lab. They just need to perfect the process first before they start trying stuff like that.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 06:53 PM
7

After I made that post I scrolled down the comments and realized that duffelblog is a satire site. Real life is getting so ludicrous that I can't tell the difference any more.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 03:16 PM
19

Right. Because the product of science and human ingenuity is so much less preferable to something that was dragged out of the ground by a child slave and sold at inflated prices because of a monopoly based on artificial scarcity.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 02:52 PM
3

I understand synthetic diamonds are coming down in price.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 02:34 PM
2

“It’s called infantry-MAN, not infantry-LADY, and that’s a scientific fact,” said Ron Meyer, a former infantryman who served in Korea and Vietnam, and avid Duffel Blog commenter. That is an utterly stupid excuse for an argument.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 02:29 PM
7

It's very rare that you encounter something that is sexist against both men and women simultaneously, but I think this qualifies.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 02:26 PM
8

The point is that at the time when abortions are performed, it isn't a baby.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 12:17 AM
20

I thought most people here were pro-choice.
/r/MensRights29/08/12 12:16 AM
8

A lot of overlap. Not 100% overlap. There's plenty of people I disagree with that I don't think are stupid. Some are conservatives. And not all the stupid people that I disagree with are conservatives. Some are leftists.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 03:07 AM
8

I'm a leftist and I don't hate conservatives. I just hate stupid people. Granted, there's a lot of overlap.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 02:01 AM
1

I've got some containers out on the porch with rosemary, thyme, basil, mint, some tomatoes, and a ghost pepper plant.
/r/MensRights28/08/12 01:58 AM
2

I think that several times throughout this thread I specified permanent body modification. Friggin' troll
/r/MensRights27/08/12 10:18 PM
3

No it doesn't include bodily integrity, but it also says that human rights are not limited to the ones enumerated there.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 08:14 PM
6

I do respect the Constitution, and unlike you I have actually read it. There is no reference to god anywhere in the Constitution. And I was wrong, it's the Declaration of Independence that says that our rights are inherent (It says "endowed by our creator with certain unalienable rights" while leaving open who or what that creator might be, but the author certainly didn't believe in the Abrahamic god). The Constitution makes no claims about the origins of our rights.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 08:10 PM
4

Our rights do not come from the Constitution. The Constitution recognizes that those rights are inherent and forbids the government from infringing on them. If you want to claim that they come from god, then you're going to have to offer evidence that there even is a god. And I don't want to hear about all the ancient cultures that tried and failed to end Judaism. That isn't evidence of anything supernatural.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 08:04 PM
7

Based on some other comments I've got, yes it is about hating Jews. That's because you perceive any interaction short of giving you everything you want to be "hating Jews".
/r/MensRights27/08/12 07:58 PM
3

Hitler wanted to oppress the Jews, and failing that, kill them. I want to see Jews treated exactly the same as everyone else. You want to see Jews get special rights. Tell me again who has the problem. You consider failure to put you on a pedestal to be the same as oppression. Like I said, no different from the radical feminists.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 07:50 PM
4

I never suggested that male circumcision was as bad as female circumcision, or that it took sexuality away. My whole point is that the parents are forcing an irrevocable body modification on an infant who is unable to consent. The right to alter a person's body belongs solely to the individual in question when they reach the age of consent. Before that, it doesn't belong to anyone.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 07:31 PM
3

And you actually believe that kind of attitude is a good thing. You're so concerned with pretending that everyone is out to get you than you can't see what people's real motivations are. You're no different from the radical feminists.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 07:26 PM
3

Ok, I'm done. You have now demonstrated that you don't care about anything but your cultural programming. You're unwilling and unable to imagine the world without the filter of your religious brainwashing. There's nothing I can do or say that will put a dent in the hermetic seal around your mind, and I have better things to do than try.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 07:02 PM
3

Again What is your problem with waiting until the kid is in his teens and can choose for himself?
/r/MensRights27/08/12 06:54 PM
2

What is your problem with waiting until the kid is in his teens and can choose for himself? "Professional victim" mean that no one is victimizing you, but you pretend that they are so you can get indignant and defensive, and act like everyone is trying to destroy your culture. No one has any interest in destroying your culture. We have enough to worry about. You simply aren't that important.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 06:49 PM
3

There it goes. Any criticism of any aspect of Jewish culture, regardless of whether it part of criticism of all other cultures who do that same thing, is met with accusations of antisemitism. Understand this right now. I don't give a flying fuck that you are Jewish. I don't care what you believe, I don't care what your ancestry is. The only thing I hate is what you are physically doing to other people. That, and the fact that you (you personally, not all jewish people) are a professional victim.…
/r/MensRights27/08/12 06:40 PM
8

And if you do leave Judaism, you are still circumcised whether you want to be or not. Is that really too difficult a concept for you? Yes, it is easy to say that there are no Jewish babies, because it's true. A baby is a cultural blank slate, on average no different from any other baby from any other culture. In order to be a member of your group, a person needs to have some understanding of your group. A baby has none. Many cultures have various "tags" for their children. And if those tags are …
/r/MensRights27/08/12 06:31 PM
6

none have ever had a problem with being circumcised Maybe they didn't have a problem with it because they are still Jewish. Have you asked any that have left Judaism? I haven't said non-Jewish people should be circumcised Where the fuck did that come from? Did anyone here suggest that you did think all male infants should be circumcised? Understand this. There is no such thing as a Jewish baby, or a Christian baby, or a Muslim baby, or a baby belonging to any other kind of religion or creed. The…
/r/MensRights27/08/12 06:21 PM
8

And the point is that they might not want to be circumcised. you just can't seem to put yourself in our shoes Just like you can't seem to put yourself in the shoes of a person whose body has been violated when he was too young to consent? I don't give a damn about your shoes. I care about the one who doesn't have a say in the matter.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 06:08 PM
6

I respect the baby's right to grow into an adult without the parents and their community "marking their territory" all over his body. If the child doesn't want to be part of that community when he grows up, that's his right. It's no better than giving the baby a tattoo. In fact it's worse, since a tattoo can be removed. Nice to know that you don't respect your kid.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 06:02 PM
11

You're so protective about the parents' religious rights. Did you ever once stop to consider the religious rights of the baby? I don't care that they are Jewish. I'd feel the same way about any other group that wanted to do it. Muslims have an ancient tradition of circumcising girls, and I bet you don't respect that tradition.
/r/MensRights27/08/12 05:54 PM
3

If this was a city cop, try getting a county or state cop.
/r/MensRights26/08/12 02:55 AM
5

Were there any women who agreed with you?
/r/MensRights24/08/12 08:22 PM
1

Threaten to have the principal arrested for kidnapping.
/r/MensRights24/08/12 07:13 PM
1

No, regardless of what subreddit that question is asked in.
/r/MensRights23/08/12 01:46 AM
7

Hopefully they're also putting them up in pairs right next to each other. Let us know if you see any of the ones on the right torn down.
/r/MensRights22/08/12 05:13 PM
2

*mild guffaw*
/r/MensRights22/08/12 11:58 AM
2

Plus, they don't actually do anything.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 09:26 PM
1

Radical feminists call it the source of all of society's ills. The establishment that forces gender roles on everyone. I call it a boogeyman.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 07:55 PM
8

2X removed the post
/r/MensRights21/08/12 02:32 PM
11

That guess was a close second.
/r/MensRights21/08/12 02:02 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter