TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ILoveHate Archive

View 5 posts and 1,085 comments by ILoveHate on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,085 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
5

Nothing like telling a bunch of people who were bullied their entire lives for their love of gaming that their hobby is wrong and broken in its current state. Take your fucking politics out of my hobby and fuck off. I don't care where you fuck off to, just fuck off. If 11 year old kids can make you feel like you just got raped in a war zone where you watched your family get murdered along everyone you knew your entire life, maybe you don't belong in gaming. Sorry but guess what, we came first. W…
/r/MensRights09/12/14 05:52 AM
3

Feminism is ruining America
/r/MensRights09/12/14 04:28 AM
3

Do you really want to be on the end of that clusterfuck though? If false accusations start affecting women, it's only a matter of time before false accusers get sent to prison. And the first one will most likely be a guy who has to serve 20+ years for calling a woman a rapist.
/r/MensRights09/12/14 04:20 AM
5

What's borderline sexual harassment? Like almost but not quite sexual harassment?
/r/MensRights07/12/14 08:28 PM
1

If you haven't noticed, government has not incentive to make women's lives luxurious. Just because BDG pays the bills doesn't mean women will be happy. There's a difference between eating a porterhouse steak and ramen. Just like there's a difference between having enough money to fill up the gas tank to go to the club, and taking a vacation to Paris. As for sexuality, I doubt it. Women will go out of their way for bad boys, to the point where they will pay and fund said bad boys just to keep the…
/r/MGTOW05/12/14 03:51 AM
3

I don't see it as men giving up on life. Men are doing what makes them happy. What I see is real life women becoming so toxic that they can't compete with Internet porn or video games. Men are just acting in their best interest.
/r/MGTOW05/12/14 03:02 AM
-2

Nothing in the text indicates this. The whole article indicates this. You don't see shit like this in the mainstream. Loneliness, childlessness, lack of family apply to men just the same. Plus all the other disadvantages mentioned in the article. Sure, but men don't necessarily live for that. And by not having that doesn't mean they're going to be miserable. Not having a nagging wife, or expensive kids, etc will leave a man with a lot of money to spend as he likes. Hobbies and pursuits to follow…
/r/MGTOW05/12/14 01:49 AM
1

I think it was spoken ironically. Men were supposed to be the victims of feminism, and to a certain extent they were. But women are more miserable than men these days, so if you look at the "true" victims, (as in the people who have suffered most) then it would be women. You have to realize that divorce, alimony, child support, etc can be avoided if you're a man. On the other hand, loneliness, spinsterhood, childlessness, lack of a family, etc is more difficult to avoid as a woman. Even if women…
/r/MGTOW05/12/14 12:56 AM
25

The only winning move is not to play.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 06:10 PM
1

There are still male only places, but men aren't retarded to advertise them. Any male only space being advertised or making the news would be besieged by feminists within days.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 06:51 AM
45

The question we should be asking is how are men taking so little time off while suffering from the "man flu".
/r/MensRights04/12/14 06:46 AM
2

"It's 2014, women mow lawns and men push prams," Ms Huberman said. Funny, being as long as I have here, this brings up some memories. Don't ask me to dig it up, because it's been years. But a few years ago a feminist made the same comment about how "back in the days" (something like the 50's or 60's), men didn't push baby carriages around, and to prove her point she posted a picture from her childhood. In the background, there were more men pushing baby carriages around than women. So once again…
/r/MensRights02/12/14 06:07 AM
0

I actually like this stuff. Not only are they getting rich off the crazies, but I prefer spotting the crazies early. If I see some chick with a "I bathe in male tears" shirt, I already know not to talk to her. So I'd rather have these products freely available than censor them.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 07:10 AM
3

I think it might also be a class divide. Single mother's aren't exactly the best decision makers, nor the brightest people out there.
/r/MensRights01/12/14 06:18 AM
2

What's wrong with making sex available for money? The only reason shit like sex trafficking exits is because prostitution is illegal. How much illegal booze are people buying these days compared to the prohibition era for example. And prostitution is only illegal for the lower classes. You want a hooker from the street corner, good chance you'll get busted. You want an escort from a private website that will meet you for coffee before anything actually happens, never heard cops run those kinds o…
/r/MensRights29/11/14 02:55 AM
6

I read that roughly 20% of these boards are women, and that only 108 companies are involved. I'm not sure if all of this is true, but let's pretend for a second. Assuming 20% of the people on these boards are already women, and there's 10-30 people per company, this would put an additional 100-900 women in a prestigious job, out of a society with tens of millions of people. This would also make everyone think that every woman on these boards got there through a quota, thus hurting the rest of th…
/r/MensRights29/11/14 02:25 AM
32

Single women giving dating advice, I'm sure it'll be very helpful.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 10:10 PM
8

SRD is taken over by SRS.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 07:51 PM
34

I hope all the women who are hired to represent 30% of those boards will be 20 years old with big tits, fit as fuck and look like they belong in a Victoria secret catalog. I want to see how these feminists would react to that.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 12:07 AM
2

Because they want votes.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 03:30 PM
4

At this rate men are going to treat women like they're infected with ebola.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 04:10 AM
1

This shit is worse than that 10 hour catcalling video where guys were offering their numbers to some chick.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 05:16 AM
1

I think it is quite damaging to the MHRM to push this sort of content, however right it may be. So feels > realz?
/r/MensRights24/11/14 12:48 AM
21

So not caring about fashion is sexist. These people are officially grasping for straws.
/r/MensRights17/11/14 05:11 AM
3

Yep, and we got rid of all of that, except the things like alimony where men are still expected to uphold their end of these archaic laws.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 04:59 PM
2

Only one guy lost his job from what I've heard, and it was a guy at the wrong place at the wrong time, he wasn't even in on the joke/talking to those guys. Reason he got fired was because she took a picture, and he was first in line if I remember, so just wrong place wrong time. She didn't even bother pointing out the right guys.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 04:47 PM
7

Men and women are attracted to different things, time to shame men. Reminds me how women shame men for basing their standards for a SO on looks, while women care about "other" things, like status, wealth, charm, intelligence, etc. One could say women want it all, and then some.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 05:23 AM
6

Give the CIA $500 million? Let them figure it out.
/r/PussyPass15/11/14 04:19 AM
3

Well yeah but they can only show us what they want us to see.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 03:50 PM
45

I wonder how many men actually honestly tried to help her out, waste time out of their day to do so, only to have their own time wasted. Hot white girl in distress? Walk by her. At best it's a stupid group trying to make a viral video, at worst, some dumb girl who needs to take better care of herself.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 07:36 AM
1

Fortunately on the internet people can split off and go someplace else. It's the equivalent of people leaving Europe and moving to North America. Maybe in the real world it's a bit more difficult, but the internet can be infinite.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 05:32 AM
2

First world privilege is having more military funding than the rest of the world combined. When will the Navy recognize its privilege?
/r/MensRights13/11/14 05:28 AM
5

Doesn't matter. It's all about successful women and lazy men, right up until the whole student loan issue arises and we'll find that there's 50% or more women affected by student loan debt than men. They'll call it crippling, they'll say it's a real issue affecting people and the government will need to do something to help them out, etc. I know a few women getting degrees for the sake of getting degrees. They work shitty jobs while going to school and getting one degree after the next. I don't …
/r/MensRights06/11/14 02:35 AM
5

You want men to stop getting fucked by the courts? Start with electing the people who will do that. Or at least stop electing the people who are pro men getting screwed.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 01:38 AM
9

So according to her from worst to least worst is Violence against women and girls > violence against boys > violence against men? Unless she's a vegan at which point we'll have to put animals somewhere in there before the men. At least one in three women and girls will be subjected to violence and abuse in their lifetimes– that’s more than one billion lives destroyed by trauma and injury. This is what I hate about this shit, 1 in 3 is nothing if you take everything into account. 1 in 3 women wil…
/r/MensRights03/11/14 12:41 AM
8

A lot of the viewers are younger college aged students who probably would fall for "colbert picks on Antita" bullshit that would get published right after that episode aired.
/r/MensRights03/11/14 12:20 AM
14

The guys getting laid who no longer have to commit to a relationship sure as hell are happy.
/r/MensRights01/11/14 03:35 PM
4

Well if catcalling isn't okay (whatever they might classify as catcalling) then women sizing me up by asking me about my education, job, hobbies shouldn't be okay either. Guys hit on women they're attracted to. Women size up men and try to figure out which one's the best bang for the buck. Don't think so? Try telling a woman you're a lawyer and dress the part, and then tell another you're a garbage man and dress for that part. See how they react.
/r/MensRights31/10/14 07:05 AM
0

Is this the one where they didn't go to the police, but instead decided to anonymously contact his employer and slander him online? Not sure if it's the same story I skimmed over a few times in other places. But if it is, he can go screw himself, he won't even stand up for himself and still claims to be for the kind of shit these women pulled on him while remaining anonymous. Apparently some women were into it and didn't go to the police because the texts they sent him were about him doing exact…
/r/MensRights31/10/14 07:00 AM
6

Was she ever for that? I thought it was that asian chick.
/r/MensRights30/10/14 02:23 AM
2

No way, she's dumb but not the dumbest. I mean I don't know that much about her, but she seems focused on the white male hate. There's people out there who are batshit, just hop on over to /r/tumblrinaction.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 05:32 AM
2

Maybe I can't read lawspeak, but the only thing I saw there was that a court can revoke a genetic father as the father of the child, while still making him pay child support. Can anyone link the part that says what the title says?
/r/MensRights26/10/14 05:10 AM
1

Any equality movement out there that came before the MRM (see something like LGBT) has been assimilated by feminism and now the feminists are the ones who lead the discussion. The MRM was laughed at by feminists a few years ago, now I'm sure they would love to take it over today or sometime in the future. But that would only benefit feminists and no one else. Now there's plenty of women who aren't necessarily feminists who are fighting for equality. But the vast majority who are into this whole …
/r/MensRights21/10/14 01:43 AM
22

I have yet to see people actively advertise this "gender neutral" lifestyle for their little girls. It's always the boys who have to go through this process, and it's always revolutionary when they do it. How about forcing a little girl to drag her shit home, and when she starts crying tell her to harden the fuck up. You know, just to see how she turns out.
/r/MensRights20/10/14 02:38 AM
14

What exactly is the point of marriage? Especially when one gender gets all the rights and the other gets all the responsibilities. You always hear about alimony being there to provide the woman with the lifestyle "she became accustomed to", but never hear a court force a woman to have sex with her ex because that's what he became accustomed to.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 09:46 PM
4

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/education/yes-means-yes-can-teaching-good-sex-prevent-rape-campus-n226416 “I think people have less-than-proud moments, sex they wish they wouldn’t have had. That’s the kind of sex we’re trying to prevent, too.” And that's the fucking law now.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/14 09:44 PM
0

For the same reason male sexuality is bad and female sexuality is empowering. Why politicians pander to women over men. It's easier to manipulate women and sell them shit than it is to put a naked woman in an ad and sell shit to men.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 01:07 AM
1

And by getting women to freeze their eggs, whether it works or not, they're getting them to avoid/postpone pregnancy and remain profitable. As far as I see it, it's the cost of doing business in the PC culture where you have to hire a certain amount of women simply to meet the so called quota. I think it's going to be very interesting to see how women in the workforce will affect our society in the future.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 12:45 AM
1

This isn't sexist, it's just good business. It's cheaper for apple to pay this than it is to pay for maternity and replacing them.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 12:11 AM
1

This isn't a liability, this is the cheap way out. Sure it's more than any man would cost the company, but they have to have a certain number of women employed. The real issues resulting from this will only be made clear in the next 20-30 years. And I'm betting that a lot of rich, old women in tech are going to realize that you can't cheat biology, not with our current level of technology. They'll either miscarry, or use a surrogate that may fight them to keep the child. In which case we'll see …
/r/MensRights15/10/14 11:58 PM
2

Not really, but I make sure people know I don't put up with that shit, so I probably just filter them out. But then again I have been harassed in the past for not answering the phone.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 10:49 PM
11

The guy on the left is better off. At least now he knows what she's like and no longer has to waste time on her. Surprisingly this commercial is more sexist towards women. Although it is sexist by trying to tell men this is normal, it also depicts women as emotionally uncontrollable and immature children.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 08:29 PM
10

That's exactly what I was referring to. That ideology is a wake up call to men. It's the complete opposite of feminism, embodied into men. As for the risks and dangers, you can't change human nature. Wanting to mate with women, or just have sex is ingrained into our very being. You can't change that any more than you can change who or what you're attracted to. They claim that the dangers are mitigated by generally degrading women and contolling them through methods they discuss. And this is wher…
/r/MGTOW14/10/14 03:11 PM
13

You can treat women however you like, but looking at things like divorce statistics it's clear that women won't be so nice when they get bored of you. The red pill is a reaction to the system women created, and perpetuated by guys who were raised in a female dominated society. These people were fed bullshit all their lives and are now reacting as expected. Think of it like the dare program. You're told that weed is bad and you can overdose from it. Then you find out it was all bullshit and start…
/r/MGTOW14/10/14 01:42 PM
22

Funny how these things always work out.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 01:43 AM
1

Student loan debt will be socialized within the next decade. There are simply too many useless liberal arts degrees flying out of overpriced, over-accredited colleges for the system to be sustainable. The cost of educating under-contributing women will be borne by over-contributing men. Of course it will, in fact it already kind of is, given the fact that the taxpayers back all the loans. And the wealthy need to have their investments repaid, no matter what. Call it a bailout, or call it loan fo…
/r/MensRights14/10/14 12:29 AM
1

The way I see it, feminists liberated women by removing gender roles. And by removing said gender roles, they removed the incentives for men to maintain their gender roles. Men won't marry, men won't live with women, and men aren't helping these women out. Sure that's still going on, but it's a shrinking demographic compared to what it was 40 years ago. Women got what they wanted, and now they realize that it's not as much fun as they thought and they want to go back to what they had before. Wel…
/r/MensRights13/10/14 11:02 PM
8

That's right. The politically correct term is spinsters.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 05:15 PM
2

It's actually pretty easy to fix. Gender quota's just like the feminists want, and work/hour quota's to top them off. When we're looking at the gender wage gap, we're looking at all full time women vs all full time men, but we aren't comparing the job titles or hours worked. That means we need more women to become minders, welders, work in oil fields, etc. But we'll still have gender pay gap because women don't work as many hours as men. This can easily be fixed by forcing women to make up the h…
/r/MensRights10/10/14 06:24 PM
1

Reminds me of a news story a few years back about a woman in the Canadian government threatening some little kid online. I don't remember exactly why, but she was doing the whole cyberbullying thing and was actually cyberbullying him. As I recall, nobody gave two shits.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 06:17 PM
14

Wait, she felt so bad for betraying her friend she was willing to send her kid to prison for potentially decades and ruin his life? I don't buy it, or she's completely nuts and needs to be removed from society.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 12:48 AM
5

Meh, nobody's gonna look at her in 20 years. Let's see how she'll like that.
/r/MensRights09/10/14 03:34 AM
2

See every matriarchy in history, most of which went extinct. That's what a feminist utopia would look like, after men built it up. I have yet to see any feminists get together, move into the middle of nowhere and start their own society. They feed off of handouts, government money, makework women's jobs, etc. But that's about it.
/r/MensRights08/10/14 04:56 AM
2

But guyse, like only 6% of rapists actually go to prison.
/r/MensRights06/10/14 02:51 AM
7

Really? You're gonna say shit like that with a straight face? Women can't get divorce without a marriage. Women can't threaten divorce without a marriage. A woman saying she's leaving her boyfriend means as much as as a guy telling a porn star he won't jack off next week. It fucking means nothing. There's no threat, no repercussion there. So who cares.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 03:18 AM
4

Can't have one without the other. And I've never seen men threaten divorce to keep their wives in check.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 02:03 AM
5

Child support, alimony, full custody, passing off their debt to the guy, etc. Not to mention physical and financial security. If a guy refuses to work, he's wrong. If a woman refuses to have sex, it's her choice.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 01:47 AM
5

You do realize the lack of manufacturing jobs (since those were all shipped away) has a big role. Those guys aren't stay at home dads, they're people who are most likely doing whatever else to survive outside of working a job that can be tracked. Selling drugs is a nice job for example. You can make enough money to live well, and also stay out of the limelight. Stealing money, doing all kinds of shady things, or just working under the table. I know a lot of people who do/did that. The fact that …
/r/MensRights04/10/14 11:39 PM
3

Good for men, bad for women. Although a lot of places are adapting and you get shit like common law marriage, or child support that supports the mommy.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 11:31 PM
1

And the media will die, just like TV is dying right now. Maybe something else will replace it, or maybe it wont, who cares.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 04:38 AM
7

I think sending her anywhere where there isn't running water would be the worst form of torture conceivable. Forget about ISIS. Too many of these feminists have grown up in a society that has coddled them and given them everything they could have ever wanted. They have no idea what the real world is like.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 04:03 AM
12

No, because only feminists claim that shit.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 10:52 PM
49

It's not even the women being in a position of power. It's the fact that we are taught to believe every time a man has sex with a much younger woman/girl it's because he took advantage of her. Our society gives more responsibility to young boys than to grown women, so whatever those boys do, they were completely aware of their choices. 16 year old girls on the other hand can't tie their own shoes.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 04:46 PM
5

They should ban all men, not just the ones who don't have a reason to be out. Reassign the cops working at night to the jobs women have during the day. If a man doesn't have a job during the day, keep paying him until you find a job for him. I'd love to see how this turned out.
/r/MensRights03/10/14 12:31 AM
1

Looks like SRS showed up to the party.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 10:36 PM
18

The argument might be stupid, but this entire conference was already run by women.
/r/MensRights02/10/14 02:17 AM
1

Any lesbian related website, although it seems harder to find than last year. Here's an example. Your partner puts you down or humiliates you. She constantly monitors your movements. She acts in an aggressive way towards you or damages your possessions. She blames you for her behaviour. She controls your money. She threatens to hurt you, other people, or herself if you leave her. Imagine reading shit like that on a regular DV site, instead of "if you're a man, here's how you can stop being abusi…
/r/MensRights02/10/14 02:14 AM
10

Just go read the DV "signs" on lesbian websites vs heterosexual ones. Usually everything women do (refuse sex, nag, wear you down, complain, start drama, incite violence, heckle, demean, etc) is considered violence. But only on the lesbian sites. The heterosexual ones, it's all about overt violence like hitting someone.
/r/MensRights01/10/14 02:36 AM
25

She's right (to some extent). When was the last time you fucked a girl for free? And I mean free. No buying her dinner, no taking her out, no getting drunk together or whatever the fuck. FREE, as in no money spent. As for other arguments. She's dead wrong, on a few issues. First off, women weren't allowed to work? When? Are we talking about the noble women or your common tavern wench? Feminists can talk all they like, but just do a bit of homework and you'll see the truth. Here's a 16th century …
/r/MensRights01/10/14 02:14 AM
1

Escorts, call girls, and all the fine ladies overseas won't accuse you of rape for having a one night stand. Quit fucking these retards and plan accordingly.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 03:41 AM
1

It is my suspicion that any such secret society, unregulated and uncontrolled, will inevitably succumb to criminality, either white-collar or blue-collar. Either an illuminati-esque cabal of insider-trading and nepotism, or a common gang. I don't know about crime, but there will be a very nice network of people in the right societies. Not necessarily insider trading, but definitely more of the "it's not what you know but who you know" type of thing.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 10:32 PM
1

I'd like to see if they actually present real solutions to problems and argue why they're better than the current solutions rather than simply argue that if women were in charge, everything would somehow simply be better. And if public education teaches us anything about women being in charge, it's that the whole system will be pretty shitty for men.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 09:40 PM
1

But that's exactly what they're doing with shit like yes means yes. We're slowly making everything illegal, but only for men, while giving women no responsibility or holding them accountable.
/r/MensRights29/09/14 09:16 PM
4

Honestly, it's more like calling black people black instead of the politically correct term "African American". Most people have no clue why people hate being called trannies, nor is there any popular history behind it.
/r/PurplePillDebate27/09/14 11:32 PM
1

This is quite literally the dumbest argument I've ever heard. Clearly the people who get jobs after getting a degree and pay taxes are going to pay for it. Sadly this kind of thing is what most people think is a good argument against free education. Nearly every country that has made education free has gotten better. I mean god damn. So we're going to take an initial hit, and where's that money coming from? Additionally, do you think people will sign up for the "free" program or the option of ju…
/r/MensRights27/09/14 04:42 AM
1

Except you can't do that anymore. Say you give everyone free education from now on, who's going to pay for it? The people with $50,000+ student loan debts and the folks who never went to college because they thought they couldn't afford it, or some other reason? Who out there wants to pay their student loan bills while simultaneously paying an extra tax that gives others a free ride? And even if let's say we just pay off the current student loans off, who's going to be okay with that besides the…
/r/MensRights27/09/14 04:15 AM
197

I was going to bitch about it just being one guys opinion, but damn, 53k likes. WTF.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 04:09 AM
6

That's not good enough in my opinion. So Hillary doesn't get elected but none of the real problems in our society are being solved, let alone looked at. How does that help anyone? Why waste time countering this BS when we should be asking the hard questions instead. Do you really think people care more about some rich girl talking about equality, or figuring out how to get jobs, afford a decent lifestyle and put food on the table? At the rate we're going, at least half the people in the US will …
/r/MensRights27/09/14 04:04 AM
4

It's not about "real issues" but here's the thing. The shitstorm that happened in 2008 with the housing bubble popping, nobody has recovered from that. Unemployment is shit. Student debt is getting out of control. Giant corporations are merging into mega monopolies. Everything, especially food is getting more expensive while wages are stagnating. The list goes on. So who the fuck cares about HeForShe? Who the fuck should give two shits about it? Ever? And yet instead of addressing issues that af…
/r/MensRights27/09/14 03:46 AM
1

Or they're just keeping everyone busy with this bullshit while all the real issues voters should be focusing on are being swept under the carpet.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 02:55 AM
12

Alimony reform didn't start until a few women had to pay it.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 03:40 PM
0

Occupy Wall street never took off thanks to the feminists and everyone trying to make every change it would have brought about about their race. It may very well be about rich vs poor, (never mind all the other issues) but people will never get anywhere, try as you might. It's a lost cause, might as well abandon ship at this point.
/r/MensRights26/09/14 05:50 AM
7

If some pedo is going to go and fuck kids in another country, do you really think giving him a talk will do anything? If I decided to take a flight to Amsterdam and someone pulled me aside and gave me a pep talk about drugs and prostitutes, do you think I'd give a shit?
/r/MensRights25/09/14 02:46 PM
3

It's like men are a completely different species to these people and alcohol (not to mention everything else) doesn't affect us the way it affects them.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 02:24 PM
2

Why the hell is she walking away every time he gets confronted? Shouldn't she be there reassuring the people not to kick his ass? WTF is this shit?
/r/MensRights25/09/14 04:25 AM
1

Funny how these pictures were leaked or known about long before she gave this speech. But everything has to be men against women.
/r/MensRights24/09/14 12:05 AM
1

It's been a while since people had a good lynching.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 10:35 PM
2

Except this is not true, there are many, many differences; both social and inherent. If that I'd the foundation of your argument then it is flawed. Gay people have issues, advantages, perspectives and drives that manifest differently. That' isn't my argument. My argument is to treat everyone the same, unless for some reason or another they have a difference. Hanging out with Greg shouldn't matter to anyone if he was straight or gay, until Greg decides to try to hook up with some dude. You're pul…
/r/MensRights22/09/14 07:17 AM
1

It's about context. If Anita wanted to say fuck men and start her own gaming company, more people (including us) would respect her for it.
/r/MensRights22/09/14 05:20 AM
1

But when you said that him saying those things is the equivalent to someone claiming not to be attracted to a particular sex, you're being dishonest or oblivious. Depending on which views persevere over the others, people suffer. I'm not, but a lot of people see that as being hateful. In fact SJW themselves claimed that being a gay man is the ultimate form of misogyny because they have fully rejected women. Normal people on the other hand are getting sick and tired of all this politically correc…
/r/MensRights22/09/14 04:53 AM
3

That's a ridiculous analogy. You have utterly missed the point. Publicising negativity towards homosexuals and homosexuality promotes this mindset and it in turn shapes our current paradigm a little bit against homosexuals. It is in my best interests that the least people possible express such opinions and that the views of people that do not dislike homosexuals continue to win. So SJW saying fuck white people is okay, but some guy saying fuck gays (with no context of which we know of) is wrong?…
/r/MensRights22/09/14 04:33 AM
5

The only question I really have is whether or not it took the SJW mentioning it to his employer to get him fired, or whether the actions he took himself would have come to light later on anyways. What he said, from a PR perspective, is very much questionable if he's also representing his company in some fashion while writing on Twitter. And even then, some companies even assert that you're not supposed to post questionable things on private social media. Except it doesn't work either way. Try no…
/r/MensRights22/09/14 04:22 AM
5

He was doxxed, didn't post it under his real name or his companies name. The company didn't lose any money for what he said, but now it may lose money for firing him (I'm certainly very curious to find out who they are). Good or bad it's relative. As a gay guy, he's certainly bad to me. If you don't care because his opinions does not have the potential to negatively impact your life that's well and good but don't pretend that others wouldn't be affected. So if say I don't like to date gay guys, …
/r/MensRights22/09/14 03:58 AM
9

What's her approach to the clear gender gap in this field and why are all the people pissed about the gap taking women's studies? Should we start hiring women's studies majors into this field? Sure, why not. Let's also hire them to run our nuclear power plants, create our medicine, grow our crops, raise our livestock and clean our drinking water as a start. I'm sure everyone would just LOVE that idea. When our society goes to shit and everyone's dying of one thing or another, I'm sure they'll ju…
/r/MensRights22/09/14 12:46 AM
7

I don't disagree with you, but let's look at it this way. The only reason he was fired was because some SJW doxxed him and called his boss to get him fired. All because they didn't agree with what he said on the fucking internet. And to top it all off, they got a black man fired from an industry that has very few black men to begin with (I'm in the same shit, although not video game development) and could have potentially ended his career. That's some white supremacy wet dream shit right there.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 11:39 PM
24

So because he doesn't like trannies or gays he's somehow bad? I'm honestly tired of all this politically correct bullshit myself. I'm not going out and preventing gays' from doing whatever anyone else can do, but at the same time I'm not going to freak out if someone says they're not 100% all about the gays. It's not like he was actively screwing people out of their ability to work or have a regular lifestyle. It's like saying, if some white guy doesn't want to date black women, does that make h…
/r/MensRights21/09/14 10:58 PM
1

It is to feminazis.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 04:08 AM
1

Reminds me of general gaming since the 90's. Been told I got raped plenty of times, been told to fuck off and die, etc. But that's just what everyone gets. Now these women are complaining about something that really doesn't matter. I mean how many women called guys who play (and still to this day) videogames losers? If you did anything that wasn't the norm, or women/girls didn't aprove of, you were a fucking loser. It really feels like these people grew up sheltered. They have never been bullied…
/r/MensRights20/09/14 03:51 AM
62

Who can blame women for being bored with men these days? Far too many of us have lost our masculine fortitude. That fortitude has nothing to do with being dominant or avoiding vacuum cleaners. It’s a product of solid values and strong backbones. That's what happens when women not only get exactly what they want, but all these men are raised by single moms or other women. But after a few years of marriage, Steve was simply not the spirited man he had once been, and Jen’s hostility toward him was …
/r/MensRights20/09/14 03:25 AM
3

If you remove men from college, going to college will be pointless. Hope these girls enojoy their student loan debt.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 01:15 AM
10

Then why are so many of them majoring in Women's Studies instead of something more male related?
/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 06:39 AM
15

I shouldn't be afraid of women accusing me of rape, so get that shit sorted out for me girls.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 11:56 PM
4

Because she's fucked over a few people who were trying to help out women. It is dishonest and screws other people who worked really hard. But mostly, nobody gives a shit about her. When the outrage happened, it was towards all of the dishonest people, but the feminists spun it as people being against her in order to turn her into a victim.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 08:01 PM
6

She fucked people to get her game picked and get better reviews.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 07:48 PM
0

I wish no male taxpayer dollars were allowed as well.
/r/MensRights16/09/14 08:15 AM
38

Easier to blame your failures on sexism than on yourself.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 06:38 AM
14

I'm not reading any salon garbage, but I will say what I've been saying forever. Feminism has been around for half a century, yet US women get fucked by health care, have no maternity leave unless their employer is generous enough to provide it, and care for their children (too young to go to school) is expensive as fuck, expensive enough that a woman is better off being a stay at home mom. If feminism hasn't been about helping the top women out there, why is it they always complain about shit l…
/r/MensRights15/09/14 06:14 AM
4

MRA's want shit like equal custody, abolishing alimony, better divorce laws. Feminists want equal outcome by forcing women (not themselves, they are very happy taking women's studies over some STEM degree) into male dominated spaces and the workforce. They are slowly creating quota's to ensure women get into those positions and will shame (and ruin lives) if anyone isn't bending over backwards for them. Red pillers are pretty much tradcons who want to manipulate women (think PUA) in order to get…
/r/MensRights15/09/14 03:33 AM
2

But she can tell the difference between calling the FBI and the police? And the reason for doing so?
/r/MensRights15/09/14 01:11 AM
2

If she directly contacted the FBI, then what cop told her to "stop doing it"?
/r/MensRights15/09/14 12:15 AM
7

Why bother?
/r/MensRights14/09/14 09:41 PM
2

But then some girl gets bullied on facebook and we make laws against it.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 09:10 PM
1

Some 35-40 year old guy with what looks to be a woman pushing 50? Yeah, not happening.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 05:30 AM
13

Wow, only 50% of women have been exposed to violence? Holy shit, women have it pretty good. I know of a ton of guys who got violent beat downs in high school, not to mention were bullied and smacked around. Even the loneliest, nicest, most unconfrontational people were picked on. Hell they were picked on the most. In fact, the only way to avoid violence if you're a guy is to be ready to be violent at the drop of a hat, and that will require significant proof (aka violence) before people get the …
/r/MensRights12/09/14 05:05 AM
9

Status symbol.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 10:47 PM
8

It's retarded, but what's even more retarded is the people willing to prosecute these kids. This isn't the first time it's happened. Hell there were news stories about 5+ years back where a few prosecutors were salivating at the thought of sending a kid to prison for taking naked pictures of himself/herself.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 12:41 AM
2

What happened to "I can wear what I want and if it offends you, that's your problem" feminist bull? Guess that only applies if you're coming to class dressed like a hooker? The twitter feed is pretty funny, if you ask me. Sums it up for me.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 12:16 AM
2

This was a topic a few years ago, most comments/threads are deleted on the feminist subreddits. But the general argument was that "men can't be trusted to take the pill".
/r/MensRights10/09/14 08:11 PM
23

Women can ask men out all they want, there's no incentive for a guy to date or do whatever women like. Just because she's doing the asking out doesn't mean that she'll get free meals and free drinks. Women might not like this, but it's a system of their own design. This is equality, not working in an office while also being pampered by your coworkers/peers.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 06:58 PM
50

Everyone should know how to cook. And nobody's forcing women to shave or have long hair, but what this is really about is men not finding them attractive. They want their cake and eat it too.
/r/MensRights09/09/14 09:28 PM
1

But you'd get tax benefits. And if you guys lived apart, you couldn't get fucked by common law marriage since you'd already be married.
/r/MGTOW06/09/14 08:19 PM
3

Plenty of married MGTOW out there. You're just stuck playing it smart for now.
/r/MGTOW06/09/14 08:17 PM
9

Also the methods women use are easier to spot. Overdose on some pills, you go to the hospital and it's a suicide attempt that makes it into some statistic. Put a gun to your head, don't pull the trigger, and nobody knows about it but you.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 12:20 AM
1

Women are already calling strip clubs and golf sexist since some business deals occur in those environments. I can see them completely losing their shit at this.
/r/MensRights05/09/14 12:10 AM
7

Once again men need to do something because women can't handle reality.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 07:22 AM
5

So when's the mainstream media who is criticizing people for jerking it off to these nude pics going to stop stalking celebrities and paying top dollar for anything and everything involving them? Not to mention give them the privacy to deal with scandals on their own without letting the rest of the world know what's going on? Never? Yeah, pretty much.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 07:17 AM
1

What kind of women needs to "raise kids" or whatever the fuck for 20 years? At that point you're just being lazy and using kids as an excuse not to work. And don't even get me started on that homemaker thing.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 05:52 AM
1

I'm not writing all the articles about "the end of men", "the end of marriage", "where have all the good men gone" or "leftover women", so no, I'm not projecting.
/r/MensRights31/08/14 01:22 AM
0

And also full of women who can't find men in their 30's. Additionally most women wait until it's too late to freeze their eggs. You also forgot to multiply by 100, and the rate goes up by a lot.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 10:46 PM
0

And what's the title of that part? The average woman can have a baby until age 41, but that's no guarantee. and your quotes about 90% of eggs by 30 aren't in there at all. Here you go. The fact is that most women who want to get pregnant, even into their 40s, do become pregnant. And they usually need medical assistance.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 10:39 PM
0

Just because you keep bleeding doesn't mean you'll get pregnant. You may want to look at this before thinking you can get pregnant whenever you like. And that's not even counting the birth defects.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 10:32 PM
-1

Doctors refuse freezing eggs after 37, the chances of a kid being born with a defect skyrocket at 35 and increase further from there. Women lose 90% of their eggs by 30 and it becomes increasingly difficult to get pregnant afterwards. Finally, the chances of a woman finding a man who is willing to start a family with her, meets her standards and they both get it all done in time is next to zero. She's only got 2-3 years before she's out, and that's assuming she starts looking right away after th…
/r/MensRights30/08/14 08:31 PM
9

So what happens if say my hypothetical 32 year old girlfriend cheats on me and I use her as a fucktoy until she's 35 before breaking up with her, thus ensuring she will never have children? She deserves to suffer for the rest of her life, right?
/r/MensRights30/08/14 05:45 PM
3

Checkmate feminists.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 06:23 AM
9

It's not so much that MGTOW is winning, it's that feminists are squeezing harder and losing more men by the day. Men aren't opting out on college campuses because we're talking about toxic women or laws, it's because of toxic women and laws. Good video tho, it's gonna be fun watching what happens to academia in the future. I doubt anyone will hire from the degree mills colleges and universities are becoming.
/r/MGTOW30/08/14 12:04 AM
1

It's because they're all tradcons.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 12:46 AM
1

Or just avoid all college girls if you're a college student.
/r/MensRights28/08/14 11:36 PM
8

11 ways to solve pregnancy better than condoms. Teach women not to become pregnant. Ensure our legal system doesn't blame men for a pregnancy. Too many pregnancy tests are currently sitting on shelves. Improve how campuses handle pregnancies. Teach women what consent looks like. Encourage the media to engage in critical conversation on "anti-pregnancy" products. Stop making men responsible for women's behavior. Stop perpetuating the myth that most men consent to pregnancy. Enforce stricter pregn…
/r/MensRights28/08/14 11:22 PM
3

Well consider the fact that women are the main ones who initiate divorce, I wouldn't think so.
/r/MensRights26/08/14 08:08 PM
9

Displace women from your daily lives, sure. But only an idiot believes they can fight human nature. There will eventually come a point where you can't fight what you are. After all, MGTOW is a new concept, and you have billions of years of evolution under your belt, you can't expect yourself to just ignore women. What you can do is minimize the cost while still getting what you want. If it's sex, or company, or whatever, it's cheaper with a hooker. Or an escort, or a sugar baby or a mistress, wh…
/r/MGTOW26/08/14 06:07 AM
6

Female only contests? When I was doing CS, we had people come in to our class and give presentations on why we should join their company/intern there/work for them, whatever. Then after wasting everyone's fucking time without a heads up (I would have gladly skipped class) they tell us that they only want women. So here you are, in a room of 50+ people with 2 girls, and this whole fucking presentation and an hour worth of time was all aimed at them, while everyone else sat around like a dumbass. …
/r/MensRights26/08/14 05:18 AM
5

Hookers are cheap compared to girlfriends or wives.
/r/MGTOW26/08/14 12:24 AM
9

Depends on what you want and how much you can afford. Look at real dolls, they cost $5,000+ and are just a bag of plastic. The smartest people have been doing research in AI for decades and we still don't have anything close that can resemble a human interaction. And you can forget about actual robots, those things are expensive. In fact, it wasn't until a few years ago when we finally started making bipedal robots, and those things cost a fortune. Japan is working on something along those lines…
/r/MGTOW26/08/14 12:15 AM
1

Well she's pretty crazy. I'm not sure if she's a single mom, but she had a whole suicide hoax a while back and was arrested of being drunk and doing I have no clue what in a hotel.
/r/MensRights25/08/14 09:53 PM
5

What do you guys have against Hitler barbie?
/r/MensRights25/08/14 02:03 AM
0

It's not a law, it's a right.
/r/MensRights23/08/14 01:43 AM
3

It might be 10 years after he was released from prison when he said that.
/r/MensRights20/08/14 09:52 PM
10

They think men cry just as easily as they do, so it's projecting all of their BS over onto men. Just the way we're all women haters for criticizing feminists, but they're attacking half the population for being the wrong gender.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 06:54 PM
2

Not all of them. The last one (and one of the first ones) were construction. One for being a supervisor and one for being a worker. I could see them getting paid more in those fields since governments are more likely to give big jobs to companies that are more "diverse".
/r/MensRights13/08/14 11:38 PM
4

It's not just the media, it's everyone. Nobody has sympathy for men.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 07:32 PM
8

It's forwards thinking. Just wish all the girls kept their mouths shut when that cute/intelligent guy fucked them right and made them feel oh so good. I knew plenty of girls who were crushing on guys 10-40 years older than them in high school. Not my fucking problem, after all, girls mature earlier than boys. They knew exactly what they wanted and what they got.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 03:43 AM
5

Does it take two when there's a divorce? How about deciding if someone has an abortion? Or giving a kid up for adoption? It always takes two until it's her body her choice. Sounds to me like the mother decided to have a kid and that was the end of that. I wonder how you'd feel about it if I decided to get my girlfriend pregnant even if she stated that she never wants a kid. Maybe I'll poke holes in the condom, sabotage her birth control and then when she does get knocked up, I'll tell everyone i…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 10:48 PM
3

Because too many women control the vote, and pandering to their bullshit is a sure thing.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 04:56 AM
3

Best comment there. I worked in global ad agencies for 25 years and I'd like to point out a few things: As a "glamour" industry--i.e. more people wanting to work for companies like these than there are places, e.g. PR, publishing, film, etc.--the entry-level payscale is next to nothing. Women are more likely to do the grunt work as a means to get their foot in the door. "Negotiating" an entry-level salary is all but impossible, because 100 (or more) other people are lined up who would do that jo…
/r/MensRights09/08/14 01:40 AM
32

Neat, let's oversimplify the problem and poke fun at people who don't want to be part of our social club.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 04:42 PM
2

Modern education is a fucking joke. All you do is memorize crap, write a test, and then flush it all out. Most teachers when I was in high school were female and were always bothered when I asked questions like "when will we use this", not because I didn't want to learn, but because I couldn't understand how it was useful. And the lack of answers they gave me proves that they didn't either.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 12:02 AM
1

Half a gallon is almost 2 liters.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 11:51 PM
0

And? I find it funny how women decide to do their anti feminism thing after the #yesallwomen bullshit. How now that MRA's, PUA's, Red Pill, MGTOW and so on are popping up, how women's unhappiness is at an all time high, how marriage rates are bombing, and so on, women decide it's time to put an end to feminism.
/r/MensRights04/08/14 05:58 AM
-1

I think it's worse than tradcons. They want the benefits of feminism while also going back and fetching the benefits of chivalry and all that nice stuff the 50's had. No woman should ever say "I want to be a stay at home mom". If she wanted to she should wish for it, hope for it, but never demand it. Nothing like dumping everything on hubby while she plays homemaker. And what happens if he doesn't earn enough? Is she going to curb her spending or will he be forced to do overtime? I'm not going t…
/r/MensRights04/08/14 05:41 AM
1

Given the divorce rate and the fact that violence against men is rarely recognized, you can't blame people for settling for survival. At this point anything but is a fairy tale.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 08:01 PM
1

I don't think anyone's out to fix things, just protect themselves.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 06:40 PM
2

Well there's a difference between fantasy and reality, but just look at romance novels. A close example is saying women want to be abused by attractive men. And just look at all the women who blew up Twitter saying they'd let Chris brown abuse them.
/r/MensRights01/08/14 12:14 PM
6

My only question really is, why on earth does anyone treat them as if they're serious, thinking people? I don't know about the red pill, but if PUA tactics didn't work, feminists wouldn't be outraged by them. So that's my little contribution to this.
/r/PurplePillDebate30/07/14 07:50 AM
3

If that were true, health care spending would be equal. Yet women get freebies like HPV vaccines while men would either be denied or have to pay out of pocket.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 08:26 AM
1

As long as they start making their own shit, rather than demanding to be let in to an already existing establishment/culture, I don't care.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 02:03 AM
7

Why do you hate all women? Don't you realize how much you hurt women by criticizing them, debating them and not accepting everything they say as truth?
/r/MensRights29/07/14 02:01 AM
2

Iggy Azalea had similar issues.
/r/MensRights28/07/14 06:33 PM
2

No, asking her if she wanted a drink is.
/r/MensRights27/07/14 09:53 PM
2

Let me tell you about that time I was almost raped.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 09:52 PM
0

Lot's of people think gay marriage is immoral, interracial dating/marriage, not belonging to a certain religion, etc.
/r/MensRights18/07/14 07:34 PM
1

/r/femra /r/ladymras
/r/MensRights13/07/14 11:40 PM
1

Better to admit to making an error than admitting to lying. I don't care who you are, if you've got that position in government and you had previous experience with these laws, she knew what was going on. She just played peoples emotions for votes. If not, then she shouldn't be fit to be in office. Would you trust the leader who declared a truce/peace last week, forgot about it this week and declared a nuclear strike because our enemies flew a plane carrying their emmissary into our airspace?
/r/MensRights13/07/14 03:12 AM
3

The company stuck by her and defended her character. In response to the accusations, Yahoo released an email that said there was “absolutely no basis or truth behind the allegations”, and that they would “fight vigorously” to clear the name of Zhang - who it described as “an exemplary Yahoo executive”. Any man in her position would have been fired, an apology would have been given, and Yahoo would have gone on about how they don't tolerate this behavior. When was the last time any company stood …
/r/MensRights13/07/14 02:13 AM
1

But that's the thing, on strike implies that when something is fixed, men will go back. The problem is that men got fucked when laws change, and they can change again. Just look at no fault divorce.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 07:57 PM
5

The account is still active and there's a lot more added to this after the initial 3 posts. Unfortunately all of her posts have since been removed, but she's pretty active in /r/srs and /r/feminism. After these 3 posts she made another one a few months later talking about how she's moved in with her dad, but he won't respect her space and decisions. I don't recall what it was all about but she wouldn't go to work and I'm pretty sure she wasn't cleaning up after herself. She also made another thr…
/r/MensRights10/07/14 07:26 PM
2

IUD?
/r/MensRights10/07/14 06:43 AM
3

No.
/r/MensRights10/07/14 06:39 AM
8

He should probably report them to the FBI for intending to forcefully create child porn. Would be hilarious to see what happens.
/r/PussyPass09/07/14 10:03 PM
1

The TL:dr is basically to remove yourself from the negative risks of society and worry only about yourself. Plenty of MGTOW still date but won't marry nor cohabit in places with common law marriage. Rather than trying to change the system they just opt out and avoid the clusterfuck altogether. Let the women have their careers and the politicians take advantage of them for votes. Sooner or later they'll turn on eachother.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 08:00 PM
7

But I majored in a real degree.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 07:52 PM
9

Women are leaving their gender roles, they have been for 50 years. The problem is that they don't want men leaving theirs. Men are starting to do so at some degree, but look at all the feminists and women complaining about chivalry, marriage, men needing to "man up", etc. Fact is that men will only abandon their gender roles when they no longer have an incentive to maintain them. Look at marriage for example, the marriage rate is abysmal ever since no fault divorce took over.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 07:38 PM
1

MGTOW isn't about refusing sex.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 07:33 PM
19

http://www.takepart.com/article/2011/11/29/6-year-old-boy-charged-felony-sexual-assault
/r/MensRights09/07/14 02:57 PM
13

What do you want? It's not like blacks in the US aren't pretty badly off, and it's not like single moms are better off from government support and collecting child support. Kicking the guy to the curb for not being a good enough of a provider isn't his fault. If you gave every single mom out there $100,000 a year as long as no man was around, it would happen to everyone, no matter their race.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 08:18 AM
37

No, he would have. There's at least one story out there about a 6 year old boy engaging in playing "doctor" with a girl around his age, and he has to sign up as a sex offender when he turns 18.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 08:15 AM
1

You guys seem to be putting your feelings ahead of reason. According to the second post in that thread, the reason it was removed was because the events depicted in the title were several months apart. I know this has happened in the past, but don't pass every feminist censoring event as the shit that happened in Toronto.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 02:09 AM
2

Every last one of them. They all accomplished nothing while the politicians got to go about their business. Pretty successful if you ask me.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 08:04 AM
21

She came over to my place after a date. Sex was implied. I have no clue, but they're really making adult interaction as toxic as adult males interacting with children. If anything, one could say that the government sees women as children.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 06:53 AM
9

Nah, just tell them that a better tip would be to tell men not to bother pulling over. That way any chances of rape become null.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 02:45 AM
2

That having their cake and eat it too will end real quick once men abandon their gender roles.
/r/MensRights06/07/14 02:39 AM
10

Probably because of this reason: Nearly a quarter of those arrested under this provision in 2012 were women i.e. 47,951 which depicts that others and sisters of the husbands were liberally included in their arrest net. Source
/r/MensRights04/07/14 03:26 PM
1

40 days and 40 nights. She did it to win a bet and show the world that she could fuck a guy no other woman could.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 09:29 PM
1

Well if you want it to be about the definition of rape.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 08:25 PM
1

It's all random, so all I can say is check in every week. But there are other MGTOW sites with members from MGTOWHQ. Here's the only other MGTOW site I trust. But you can go look for whatever you want. Only advice I would give is to stay away from AVFM "MGTOW" forum. They have always been keen on getting MGTOW on board, even when most MGTOW didn't want anything to do with them. Makes me think they have an agenda, plus there's that political correctness.
/r/MGTOW29/06/14 05:08 AM
18

Got tired of the whole MRA thing and arguing with feminists. advice if we have any. MGTOW doesn't mean renouncing women, just not interacting with them when the risks outweigh the benefits. Fuck them, date them even, but don't marry, ever, and don't cohabit in common law marriage states/provinces. Don't act as a fatherly figure towards a single moms kid, and better yet just avoid single moms altogether. Remember that women represent 50% of the population, so don't act like a vagina is a rare thi…
/r/MGTOW29/06/14 02:15 AM
7

It's just companies using stupid hash tags to make a "statement" and sell their shit. If anything I'd be outraged if I was a woman because they're using issues that affect people to simply sell their product.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 03:13 PM
1

When it comes to Africa, circumcised men are more prevalent when it comes to HIV. These people just want the money from circumcisions.
/r/MensRights28/06/14 01:35 AM
2

I think it might be a lack of knowledge? I'm not sure what the education is like over there, but if people lack it enough, they might think it's like cancer, where it just happens. So if you're circumcised you're less likely to get HIV (or cancer).
/r/MensRights27/06/14 11:27 PM
90

So six months in jail pretty much means he lost his job and any chance at future employment. It seems like this country is punishing anyone for being honest and responsible. Might as well lie on your job application, if they check it, you get fired, if they don't, you make bank.
/r/MensRights27/06/14 11:16 PM
0

About your first quote, one has to wonder if the percentage dropped because there are more applicants today rather than black men not applying. If back in 2002 we had say 26 black men apply and 974 others, while today we have 50 black men apply and 1950 others, the numbers would be up, way up, but percentage wise they would be down.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 06:26 AM
72

If this is a white person, I hope s/he goes to Japan or Africa for a while, actually forever. Tell me about how you can't be racist towards white people then.
/r/MensRights22/06/14 06:23 AM
6

That was 25 fucking years ago. But rape is worse, because she was drunk and it lasted 5 minutes. No, I'm not trying to get into a war on who had it worse, but holy shit these guys basically lost every opportunity, every chance, every major year of their lives for what? Being born with a penis? The wrong skin color? They not only had their lives destroyed, but any chance at making a life for themselves afterwards. To put shit into perspective, 25 years before they were convicted, we promised to p…
/r/MensRights21/06/14 03:54 AM
12

I always hate how people skip the middle step. Yeah she falsely accused a bunch of innocent guys of rape and had a court case that lasted over a year and fucked up their lives. She wasn't punished for it. She also stabbed her boyfriend to death and is now facing a long time in prison. But everyone skips over the middle part. She had a boyfriend after the false rape case and before stabbing this new guy to death. She tried to fucking burn his house down with his 3 kids sleeping inside, and then c…
/r/MensRights20/06/14 08:23 AM
3

Kid's over the age of consent and she's not his teacher. This is the most pointless bullshit ever. The jail, the probation and especially the sex offender registration. I don't see what laws were broken here, so why fucking punish her? Not to mention post her picture and name online.
/r/MensRights17/06/14 11:56 PM
13

Yeah, because if anything we need to discuss regarding war is the rape.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 06:39 AM
4

"Real men don't buy girls", but they sure as fuck will game them for votes and profit.
/r/MensRights07/06/14 08:40 AM
3

I wonder what's going to replace higher education (if anything at all) when it all goes to shit. And at this rate, it's going to shit real quick. If the politically correct culture keeps doing what it's doing, there won't be a point to higher education in the future. The whole point is to explore new ideas, challenge old ones, and learn. If you can't do that, then what's the point? We're going to have an entire generation of women in debt, without the possibility of a relationship, acting like e…
/r/MensRights07/06/14 08:16 AM
7

I think the real unethical issue is that we're not "vaccinating" our girls.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 11:53 PM
2

I think it's the part where they say if the person is drunk, high, or incapacitated in some form where they don't understand what's going on is rape. But how are you going to prove they were actually drunk if the accusation comes up a few days/weeks/months later? And hooking up at a party is basically instant rape. So it's he said she said, but everyone's cheering for her.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 08:07 PM
26

Don't worry guys, it's all good as long as he doesn't remember it. Like date rape.
/r/MensRights06/06/14 08:08 AM
4

Put one of these everywhere. Problem solved. Hell the colleges can sell the footage or have a premium monthly membership where anyone, anywhere can check any camera at any time for a small fee and VIP members get access to the bathrooms/changing rooms/etc. Hell make it a tiered system. I'm not saying this could reduce bills for the students (that's never going to happen), but the system will pay for itself in no time and bring in a nifty profit for the college.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 03:24 AM
5

Merely criticizing them is enough to be labeled a misogynist.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 01:44 AM
39

Life isn’t fair. Life is NOT fair. I get that part. Women will judge you. Some will judge you based on your appearance, your height, your width, you genitalia, your wealth, your car, your clothes, your acne. In other words, they will judge you the exact same way you judge them. So why not tell this to feminists? "Life is not fair" and to just fuck off. Who needs a feminist movement? Because you will always be judged by how you look and what you (don't) have. Just deal with it ladies.
/r/MensRights29/05/14 04:24 PM
22

Up until now people we're saying that all MRA's are divorced men who lost custody of their kids. Now it's because we feel entitled to women.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 08:39 PM
2

More than 1 in 1 women will eventually die in the presence of their loved ones or have her corpse exposed to them. We live in a terrible society where men feel entitled to see the women they own either die, or to inspect the remains in a "last laugh" fashion. Even if these women were their mothers or grandmothers. Source: Biotrufs.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 09:40 AM
1

Which is my point. There's plenty of outrage about women hitting men and violence against men. But yet it continues and it's accepted. And of course the bull gets punished. The bull was already expected to die. We do this with any animal who does far less. If a dog bites someone, that dog is put to death, automatically. Nobody weighs the options, nobody gives two shits, dog is going to be dead. And that dog dies for a lot less than a bull taking someones life.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 07:17 AM
6

Matadors attack bulls far more often with a far greater rate of success. But only when the bull wins does it make news. And only when the bull wins are people truly outraged.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 05:04 AM
2

Puahate is more traditional bullshit rather than newer PUA/MRA/MGTOW. In fact it's strictly against anything those three have to say. The guy put women on a pedestal and thought they needed special treatment. I find it amazing how people think these tactics will work. You're spreading lies and bullshit in a society where we can fact-check anything, anywhere, in a matter of seconds. Sure, most people won't bother fact-checking, but those same people will also forget about this in a week. And then…
/r/MensRights27/05/14 03:06 AM
4

The 75% number is BS but I can see the logic in it, too bad these girls can't. If you divide the population up, you can have 50% children and 50% adults (in nations where people don't get to live to 80+). From there, 25% are boys or men and 25% are girls or women. If you take all the children (boys + girls) and the women, you get a 75% number. Mind you that men, women, and children are dying at the same rate, but because we put women in the same category as children (why do we do this? I don't k…
/r/MensRights21/05/14 06:00 AM
1

Business majors and feminists on the other hand do. Business majors control the corporate world, and feminists control the academic world. Just look at the number of male teachers, and how the educational system has favored girls and their study habits, versus boys. If a future generation is raised on rote learning and judged on their ability to sit still and be quiet, who wins? Who is the system favoring? If boys have to memorize shit, play arts and crafts, and sit still just to pass a class, t…
/r/MensRights19/05/14 03:58 AM
1

The first girl I loved was in this exact position. After having a "falling out" with the teacher and him telling me something about "the worst day of my life" I told him he was unluckier than me. Long story short, the hottest girl I ever saw had a crush on him and would have fucked his brains out given a chance. Unfortunately it was 40 (something) years too late. Yeah, I've been there, and high school girls will lick the ball sweat off of some guy that they have a crush on. Hell I've experienced…
/r/MensRights19/05/14 03:01 AM
2

To avoid being shadowbanned, don't comment or post in subreddits which are linked from here. Funny story, I'm subscribed to a lot of subreddits that are linked here. And I'll actually comment in those subreddits (and have done so in the past) before finding about it here. If they ban me, I'll just make a new account. The only thing I do hate is that my old account isn't saved. I "saved" a lot of good shit, and would like to visit it again at some point. I distinctly remember I saved a thread 3 y…
/r/MensRights19/05/14 02:29 AM
7

Job applications (whether it comes to politics, business, or anything else), "it's simply not the same if a man competes with a woman". Men are better. They don't have periods, they don't slack off, they don't complicate things and create more work for themselves, and they certainly don't let their feelings get in the way. If you want it done right, on budget, and on time, hire a man. Oh, that's sexist? Well fuck you too, because that's exactly what these articles are saying about women.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 05:09 AM
6

Projection. See women and disney/sex and the city/hollywood bullshit. If anything harms people and them having a normal relationship, it's female hypergamy and all the bullshit they've been fed through a television set, or a romance novel.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 04:59 AM
1

Out of interest are there any states where teachers themselves rather than just principals or vice principals can administer corporal punishment? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_corporal_punishment#United_States Note that only two states banned it in private schools, while 31 banned it in state schools only. And by the way, how is treating a kid lie this construed as "corporal punishment" anyway? Surely if corporal punishment is legal, there are some guidelines that set out what forms are pe…
/r/MensRights15/05/14 11:40 PM
1

Because it varies from state to state.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 05:00 PM
0

Yeah, I know, see my other comment. Hence why I was skeptical and never claimed it was legal.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 07:32 AM
1

Guessing mods can see every post. Click on his/her name and you'll see the page isn't found. So that account "doesn't exist". Have to admit it's kind of weird I always and only see these post here.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 07:23 AM
1

What does size have to do with anything? Suicide bombers in Israel would walk into public buses and blow the shit to hell. They would not only kill people bigger than them, but would kill dozens of people in the process. Should their size, or the fact that they were up against dozens of others be taken into account? Bitch murdered her boyfriend with a fucking knife. If his size mattered, it would only prove that it was premeditated, after all, how does a girl kill a big sized guy without plannin…
/r/MensRights15/05/14 06:56 AM
2

Let's talk about the secretaries working for the same company making 77 cents to the dollar the men make.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 06:47 AM
11

Deadbeat dad can't afford kids, court orders him to not have anymore. Deadbeat mom can't afford kids, government pays for them.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 06:39 AM
2

At which point higher education will be seen as pointless, and we'll move on to a new system. Even if it remains relevant, it won't be in this country. You want to go to college, go to another country. See how many people can afford that, or how many banks are willing to pay for you to go abroad. The rich will go to good schools and the rest will be fucked fighting for scraps. Welcome to the 19th century, 2.0. Maybe the women's studies majors can complain about the injustice of the system as the…
/r/MensRights15/05/14 06:34 AM
-8

I'm so glad you aren't teaching children or are in charge of them. Why don't you try reading up on it? It might not be allowed in Ohio, but it's not like I was claiming it was. I was merely stating that yes, it's allowed in certain places, and according to this map, it's still allowed in quite a few places in the US.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 05:26 AM
2

You know what else isn't cost effective? Men sponsoring women through government programs. Get on that. The retirement age in the UK for women is 5 years before men for example, given the fact that women live longer, earn less, and therefore pay fewer taxes, it should be raised by at least 10-15 years. Men retire at 65, women retire at 75. It's only fair, and given the cost/benefit analysis, it's the right decision.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 04:03 AM
-12

I don't know if this is illegal. Corporal punishment is a thing and the parents and the guardian (aka the teacher) are allowed to do it. So yeah, a teacher can beat the shit out of your kid (as long as no bones are broken or a (realistic) need to visit the hospital, it's okay. Don't like it? Tough shit, it's one of the reasons attendance is taken in every class before it starts. Teachers are responsible for every student in their classroom. Assuming she was one of his teachers that is, if not, s…
/r/MensRights15/05/14 04:00 AM
1

There's a lot of reasons to play a female character. I did it because of the butt stuff, but it depends on the game. For example playing a female character in unreal tournament or quake 3 was better since the females were smaller, therefore harder to spot and hit from a distance. Here's an example. Given that these were twitch games with huge maps, distance, constant movement and speed really counted for a lot when it comes to not getting hit, and being 30% (or so) smaller goes a long way. So it…
/r/MensRights14/05/14 01:57 AM
1

Finally we have equality. Well in some regards.
/r/MensRights14/05/14 01:45 AM
5

Doubt it. I've seen plenty of friends run into these girls. Some of them had the balls to just leave, others waited until she cheated on them and dumped them. Either way, crazy can get real crazy quick.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 07:00 PM
1

I think they're just trying to create this relationship of community to create more outrage. Like if they said "those girls" or "their girls", most people wouldn't care.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 06:54 PM
7

Don't worry, we're all about equality. As you can see in the video, the officers assaulted the male trying to defend himself, while completely ignoring the batshit crazy woman. Finally we're pushing towards a more equal society. We did fine him for being attacked, unfortunately we couldn't fine him for simply being in possession of a penis since it would violate our laws against trans women. We're working on the fine details as we speak, so who knows, maybe next year a man being assaulted by a w…
/r/MensRights10/05/14 05:48 AM
5

Unsubscribe, nobody's forcing you to see that shit. It's why I subscribed and unsubscribed from /r/twox. I got tired of every other post being about period shits and periods. You have a choice, nobody's forcing this shit down your throat. Well not after the initial period of signing up for reddit. But I have to admit that it's hilarious how /r/rtwox became a default subreddit to help change the "sexism" towards women on reddit. And the first day the top post is about how men shouldn't post on th…
/r/MensRights09/05/14 06:12 AM
11

I'm not the one who tells women or claims that women are inferior to men. I'm not the one who says a man can destroy a woman completely with nothing but his dick. And I'm certainly not the one who keeps telling women that they can never earn as much as a man because society dictates so. But sure, let's talk about feminism. After all, why are feminists arguing about affirmative action, quota's in the workplace, and demanding men be held responsible for drunk sex, while claiming women are nothing …
/r/MensRights09/05/14 05:47 AM
2

So obviously all moms should go there on their own and pig out. Oh wait, it says in fine print "With purchase of greater or equal value". I honestly think people should do this, and just pig out on the most expensive foods they have (I'm guessing crab legs). If you eat 4+ pounds between the two of you, the restaurant will lose money.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 03:40 AM
5

They're just trying to link prostitution to sex trafficking. And then of course linking things like male sports to prostitution.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 10:16 PM
5

Yeah, "well tell you you're pretty as long as you give us your money". That's basically what modern day advertising to women has become.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 10:12 PM
1

So what? You're afraid a political party will see the opportunity to pander to women, hand them everything on a silver platter in order to stay in power, and fuck the economy and everything else? Oh wait, welcome to the democratic party of the US. As for these girls, they can vote all they want. Their student loans won't be forgiven and the more governments pander to them, the more fun we'll have.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 02:51 AM
13

I don't think it's because vagina, but because of our government/society. We need men to march off to war and if need be, die for their country. This is something that's been around since history began. So the only successful societies are the ones who are willing to send their men off to die, which means raising people to have little sympathy for men. If we created a society that had as much sympathy for men as it did for women, we would never go to war and therefore never stand a chance agains…
/r/MensRights08/05/14 12:13 AM
1

Here's the problem, all states that count the marriage rate but not the divorce rate. So although it looks like it's around 50%, we get that number from comparing all marriages to most divorces. California has the highest population in the US, but it's one of the states that doesn't keep track of divorces. In fact you can see that in the data you linked to. So if we eliminate 15-20% of the US population when it comes to divorce, but we keep track of marriages, we get a skewed number that brings …
/r/MensRights07/05/14 11:36 PM
3

It's tumblr, one day these people will grow up, or not. It's tumblr.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 11:24 PM
6

They should replace all city service workers with women, that way I can reduce my utility costs by 23%. Sure it's not as glamorous as being a Hollywood movie director, but it'll do a lot more for the community.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 04:23 PM
1

The numbers would reflect it. But both higher age groups have fewer dads than moms.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 12:33 PM
0

How do you look at that? Like a potential or actual facts. The reason I ask is because you're technically right. The data is 14 years old, but it is the best I can do. There are more than twice as many moms as dads in the 18-24 year bracket, and I'm sure the trend has only been getting worse. The only way this trend can exist if the same guys have been knocking up multiple women. This would in fact prove you right with the men having more children than women. But that still leaves the vast major…
/r/MensRights07/05/14 06:03 AM
9

who might you be talking about? I know that MRA's always love to bring up feminist who had some influence a long time ago and point out how feminism holds up these ridiculous notions. There's like totally not a "quota" in the EU for both government and high level corporate jobs. Just like there's totally not a "guilty until proven innocent" system in US colleges. Power? what power? Women have no power. They make 77 cents breaking their backs for every dollar a man finds. yet, if we apply this li…
/r/MensRights07/05/14 05:53 AM
1

Shit, I'll vote for her. The bank bailouts are going to bite us in the ass sooner or later, might as well have her in charge when the system corrects itself. And her pandering to women is just enough to shove us off the edge of the cliff we're on right now. If anything's going to send a proper message to people, it's her being in charge and helping the whole system collapse. We can't just give free jobs to people based on their skin color or gender because we want to be politically correct. And …
/r/MensRights07/05/14 05:41 AM
24

Don't kid yourself. It's not men who contributed to government expansion. And a woman can shit out 5 kids who would produce more than you could ever hope to. Men are worthless to the government for the most part. That's why we've been cannon fodder for as long as time.
/r/MensRights07/05/14 04:30 AM
6

According to the prosecution, he took the girl to Kodaikanal in 2007 and raped her several times after giving her soft drinks laced with sedatives. She got shitfaced and blames it on a fucking date rape drug. Seriously, this was 7 years ago. Not even the CIA or NSA would know if there were drugs in those drinks or not. Apparently nobody can get blackout drunk without some kind of roofie being present.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 12:50 AM
11

Here's what I don't get. These lists are (presumably) created to notify others of potential dangerous individuals around them. The only person this woman cared about was her kid. She's not going to go around kidnapping someone elses kids. So what's the point of this?
/r/MensRights06/05/14 12:42 AM
10

Don't forget the playing hard to get bullshit. Women love playing hard to get, but then start bitching about a guy not "picking up" her signals. Maybe we should just simplify life by having everyone's attractiveness rated every 6 months. Then forcing them to wear that number around their neck. Any guy hitting on any girl whose number is isn't 2 numbers below his is "creepy". The rest are doing great, but she's just playing hard to get.
/r/MensRights05/05/14 11:56 PM
2

plus she basically said that if the man was aroused, even under the influence of drugs, then he wants it. Just in, attractive men cannot rape women. Time to start hitting the gym.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 07:46 PM
1

That's like saying it's weird that the top comment supports men. But I guess that would be weirder if it wasn't on /r/mensrights. Just a matter of perspective. If someone is attracted to children but doesn't act on it, they're a pedophile, but that doesn't make them a bad person. It's not like they hurt anyone or took advantage of anyone. Sure it sounds bad in the grand scheme of things, but let's at least live in a world where we judge people on their actions and not their thoughts.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 03:17 AM
34

The only thing I have to say on this matter.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 03:09 AM
2

If I had a wish, I don't know what I'd wish for. Either make all men gay, or that no man would ever give any woman any attention whatsoever. Either way, it'd be fun to watch the outcome.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 02:22 AM
3

Some 40 year old woman gets "raped", and all you hear is "rape culture". Some 12 year old girl get's raped and nobody cares. What you don't remember this scene? That was 3 fucking years ago. Guess the right guy was doing the raping then. And last I checked, feminists didn't give two shits about 50 shades of grey, no they defended it for being the best book ever. I guess it's only "rape" when they feel like it.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 01:47 AM
2

The marriage rate is a false statistic. A few states like California don't count divorce rates but they do count marriage rates. We're comparing ALL the marriages in the US vs most of the divorces. This gives us 50% (or so), but what about the states that don't count their divorces? I don't feel like going through the trouble of doing the math, someone else can do it. Here's a chart. all you need now is the population of each state (wikipedia?) and knock yourself out. Either way, the divorce rat…
/r/MGTOW04/05/14 12:31 AM
2

It seems like a great idea in case shit goes down, the problem is living in such a highly populated area. People will steal food most of all when they get hungry, so in a great depression scenario, it's not going to count for much. But I suppose it's better than nothing. Assuming society won't go to shit, it's a good way to save money, but also a lot of work. Depending on your job, you'll have to calculate whether it's worth it or just put in some extra hours at work. I guess it all depends on w…
/r/MensRights04/05/14 12:25 AM
3

How do so many public trials include completely anonymous people? Especially when it comes to children. If they can have public trials without people knowing whom is whom, then why can't they do the same but keep the defendant anonymous as well?
/r/MensRights03/05/14 11:45 PM
2

don't pull this shit with me, at least have the moral integrity to own what you say you freaking weasel. I'm a weasel for calling her a hypocrite? you're saying regret for a consensual engagement is rape culture? For starters, I've read past the original article because I like to know what they're talking about. From Bella Knoxs' article: In a few sentences, my friends had epitomized slut and victim shaming. In that moment, I felt enraged that my female friends had perpetuated rape culture. I al…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 02:54 AM
2

but you are, you know you are, i know you are. don't take me for a fool. I'm just replying to a thread based on a response to her "everything is rape culture" bullshit. people have kinks, it is one of the things that make us human......but why am i telling you this, you will only seek to make it misogyny. And yet she dismissed her friends and their opinion based on her feminist studies. She herself might get off on men using and abusing her, maybe other women do the same. Maybe some women feel r…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 02:34 AM
3

I'm not trying to do any of that. It's just that plenty of feminists have claimed porn perpetuates rape culture when referring to a lot less. These are women being told they're a disappointment, failures, fat, ugly, what their fathers will think when they see them here, etc. From her own videos description: She says she enjoys watching our videos and what turns her on the most is "seeing the misery in the girl's eyes". From someone who feels strongly about rape culture, she sure loves to be mist…
/r/MensRights02/05/14 02:18 AM
2

I would consider being choked, beaten, slapped, insulted, spit on, etc to be pretty fucking degrading. Maybe we've both seen different video's she's made? Maybe you've heard of "facial abuse"?
/r/MensRights02/05/14 02:08 AM
4

It's funny given the fact that she did some of the most violent/degrading porn in the industry. I'm not going to link to it, but if you feel like seeing it, just search through efukt (very NSFW), the ending of that video is priceless.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 01:05 AM
5

Biden is a rape apologist. Obviously rape is worse than hitting a woman. We need to rally the feminists.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 12:53 AM
1

That's up to you, but don't expect others to put their lives on the line for someone just because they're a woman.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 12:33 AM
10

Male privilege is being able to walk in public without being sexually harassed on a regular basis. http://24.media.tumblr.com/85a91f2b9c2a93b99dd19621d7e0e33a/tumblr_mff0i7zxYS1rtcur5o1_1280.jpg Male privilege is the ability to occupy any space and not be inundated with attempted flirting, This guy never went to a strip club, or anywhere else if you're an attractive guy. Lose some weight, lift some weights, get a tan, and dress nice. You won't be able to walk into a store, a coffee place, or any…
/r/MensRights01/05/14 05:32 AM
2

Nope. You should do what you were taught in school, sit idly by, get out of sight and call the proper authorities to deal with it. I got in more trouble defending myself against bullies than the bullies did for doing whatever they did. They want to push shit like this, the best thing to do is play along. If the police has no obligation to protect you in these circumstances, why should a random civilian? Some chick getting raped shouldn't be any different.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 05:03 AM
3

I thought the war on women was won when they elected those female senators? I guess it's like the war on terror, we'll keep it going until we either have no more women, or everyone votes democrat. So how about we chat about the shitty economy, or the shitty health care, or the student debt crisis that's looming across the horizon? No? Okay, let's keep talking about the pay gap.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 04:28 AM
2

I've been wondering what happened to her.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 06:52 PM
4

I need feminism because more cats need a home. Seriously, some of those girls are just crazy, like the one who wants to wear a dress and be in charge. Why? What happened to equality? Or the one who thinks learning how to cook is oppressive. You eat every fucking day of your life, if you learn how to cook you will not only save a shitload of money but you will also eat very well. I'm a guy and I've been cooking since high school. It's one of the most important skills I have ever learned in my lif…
/r/MensRights30/04/14 05:48 PM
4

Actually it's 0.44%.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 03:40 AM
0

Meanwhile, I have to wear long pants, and long sleeved dress shirts. I don't think I've ever had a professor show up in a T-shirt and shorts to teach. And this applies to any office out there as well. Men get screwed in the summer, women get to dress up and dress for the weather.
/r/MensRights28/04/14 03:35 AM
7

Someone needs to tell her all guys are like that and to fuck off. We're all better off if she just stays away from all men. Oh and it wasn't rape if you agreed to being fucked just to get it over with. Would it be fair for me to give $1 to a bum and then proceed to find the first LEO and tell him that I was robbed by a bum? And society doesn't teach not to rape or grope? Really? Sure it doesn't teach her not to do these things, but try being a guy while growing up. Maybe we really need to start …
/r/MensRights27/04/14 12:55 AM
2

Iraq, 2003-2011. Look up "stop-loss policy".
/r/MensRights27/04/14 12:21 AM
11

So I looked up that study over here. The numbers are pretty close these days, 52% of boys and 50% of girls admit to doing it. Sexual harassment includes brushing up against someone. Additionally, more girls than boys admit to harassing someone if they wanted to have power over them or wanted something from them (isn't this the definition of rape?). Finally, on page 20 you will see that wile 83% of girls experience harassment, 79% of boys do as well. So don't act like it's the end of the world. N…
/r/MensRights27/04/14 12:12 AM
19

Really? The British can't relate to it? Or any other country in Europe that has just recently abandoned mandatory military service (and let's not discuss the rest of the world, because it only gets worse). And I'm pretty sure being forced to kill and die not to mention suffer in war is a bit worse than some guy telling you that you have a nice ass. Now that you're full you little troll, go play in the middle of the highway.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 11:39 PM
1

what's the thoughts with the laws that "after 6 months of living together, the government confers all the rights on marriage"? Well not every place has common law marriage, but yeah, you need to be careful. If you live in a place where it exists, better to just have your own place and be strict about it.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 08:45 PM
125

"Male experience simulator" What do you want to wear today? T-shirt and shorts. Where do you want to go? The gym. On the way to the gym an Army recruiter confronts you. At his side two young women holding white feathers proceed to call you a coward. Congratulations, you have been drafted into a war. It is your privilege to fight and die for your country.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 06:06 PM
3

I'm MGTOW and it's not really a subsection. The general rule is that people join up to become PUA's (pick up artists) for the sex, then after realizing what women are like, they start to become MRA's. After burning out and getting tired of both the feminists and society holding up women on a pedestal, you start to become MGTOW. It's what happened to me and what happened to A LOT of other MGTOW I talk to. I'm not here to speak for all MGTOW, but that "movement" isn't about getting something out o…
/r/MensRights26/04/14 02:46 AM
5

Okay, let's put it this way. Say a guy who's 5'5" and weighs 130 pounds starts shit with another guy who's 6'3" and 230 pounds, rock solid. The shorter guy keeps hitting him over and over and then all of a sudden the bigger guy smacks him back, lays him out, and probably puts him in the hospital. What would anyone do? Would people even care? Most people would say the smaller guy deserved everything he got and he was asking for a beating. Yet the second we switch the gender on the smaller person,…
/r/MensRights26/04/14 02:02 AM
52

It's worse to rape a woman than to kill her. We should all take a page from Joffrey's book and do as he did. NSFW Hell fuck murder, even torture is okay. Even killing children. But one woman gets "raped" and it's time for the feminists to come out of the woodwork.
/r/MensRights26/04/14 12:11 AM
1

It depends who you ask.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 05:04 AM
1

I never said you shouldn't, just that underwear for women most likely won't last as long as underwear for men.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 05:02 AM
1

It's naturally acidic in order to prevent bacteria/infections. Looking around I came across this: A pH level of 3.8 to 4.5 is indicative of a normal, properly estrogenic vagina And according to this chart, a healthy vagina is between soft drinks and acid rain.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 04:58 AM
1

The vagina is acidic which over time can wear out underwear causing holes or bleaching the color as it does "leak".
/r/MensRights25/04/14 04:45 AM
8

Also, it sounds like you're blaming the girls who want to game for the actions of the girls who shamed you growing up. I can't imagine you're referring to the exact same girls... so why blame one for the actions of another? I don't know about console gaming, but when it comes to PC gaming, girls are still fairly "rare" in the sense that they're under 10% of the population (or at least so it seems). I'm not personally blaming girl gamers, but I can understand where the people who do so come from.…
/r/MensRights24/04/14 10:05 PM
9

I think the reason that the gaming community reacts so rabidly and and violently to Sarkeesian is that she, as an outsider, inserted herself into the community and accused it of sexism. Not just her, but a lot of women. There's a few reasons for that. For most women who get into gaming, there's always been the ones who use their gender to get freebies or better treatment. On average they're not as good as the men, and when people start pampering them, it pisses the rest of the group off. These w…
/r/MensRights24/04/14 09:39 PM
4

Meh, I don't bleed into my underwear, nor do my corrosive "juices" burn holes into them. If the underwear isn't dirty after washing, doesn't have holes in it and isn't wearing out, why throw it out? I also love the underwear models, I'm thinking this is just huffingtonpost being paid to advertise underwear and get women to go out and buy some for their men.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 09:04 PM
13

That's like saying the guides who take you up mount Everest are sexist because they're more likely to survive. The reason these people are more likely to survive is because they're more likely to know how to swim, better prepared for cold, ocean waters, and they're usually men, which makes them better equipped for rough/outdoor survival. And this is especially true for men in the ocean. When the subjects were subgrouped according to similar body fatness and 60 min of immersion (6 women and 5 men…
/r/MensRights24/04/14 08:59 PM
8

It happens, but I think there's more women out there who expect men to buy them something than men who are actually willing to do so.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 05:15 PM
9

Meh, I honestly find all this shit is getting out of control. Can't people hit on other people anymore? Yeah she's older, but he looks like he's of legal age. Leave people be. If you want to attack someone, attack all the dumb-asses who believe hitting on someone of legal age isn't okay if a man is doing it to a woman.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 03:17 PM
2

Well I just watched half that video, it's late and I'm not in the mood. Atheism has nothing to do with it. So fuck that point. Women who have a lot of sex are sluts, and guys who do the same are studs. That's a fact, that's life, that's just how things work. Men don't set up the rules when it comes to sex, women do. A woman goes on OKCupid and she gets 100-500 messages a day (depending on how hot she is). A man get's shit. For a man to be "slutty" he has to be charming, attractive, fit, intellig…
/r/MensRights24/04/14 05:38 AM
3

Women see gender as a social construct because that's what they are. Every generation demanded different things of women, but similar things of men. Men had to be hard workers, intelligent, successful, and well behaved. Women on the other hand have been changing from ladies to whatever men desire. These days women shave their legs, wax their vaginas, wear high heels, dress in form fitting dresses, wear spanx, wonder bras and all kinds of other shit to make themselves look better and younger. Top…
/r/MensRights24/04/14 01:42 AM
9

It's funny because if you read this huffingtonpost article, they specifically cut out the part where she says girls do it more. I wonder how long before they'll just cut the entire girls part out and we'll have another thing for feminists to rally around.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 09:50 PM
2

You don't fix it, you either go "red pill" or you just become MGTOW. There is no fixing, men have no power to fix any of this shit (and neither do women anymore). There was a reason women had gender roles, just like there was a reason men had gender roles. Now that women no longer have gender roles, look at what's happening. But the real fun will begin when men decide to shed their gender roles. That will certainly "fix" the problem, just don't expect it to get fixed in your lifetime, or this ce…
/r/MensRights23/04/14 08:52 PM
2

What about the constant resistance to giving men any rights when it comes to children, just responsibilities? Or how feminists are outraged when a male birth control is proposed, citing that men can't be trusted to take it?
/r/MensRights23/04/14 08:15 PM
3

I can't wait for this girl to start buying me dinner and paying for my shit.
/r/MensRights23/04/14 07:00 PM
3

Here's a graph that shows it to be 21. The thing that we don't see is what people are looking for. I just skimmed through it so I might have missed it, but it seems to be comparing all men vs all women. On OKCupid you have people looking for friendships, short term, long term dating, casual sex, etc. If all the women under 30 are looking for short term relationships while all the men over 30 are looking for long term relationships, we're going to miss out on this if we just compare everyone the …
/r/MensRights23/04/14 05:44 PM
3

I believe it was this one (long time since I saw it). Wiki. Episode 1. And the post that gets copied/pasted on this subject often.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 12:28 PM
-1

Screw the prison sentencing, just make her pay for what it cost to have that manhunt. Why should the taxpayers pick up the bill for her lies? Plus it would be a punishment that would last a lot longer than a few months.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 12:48 AM
20

Why do you need men's rights when you have feminism? This video is my answer.
/r/MensRights21/04/14 12:43 AM
12

It already happened on (I think Belgian) survivor. They had two groups, one all male and one all female. The women didn't even build shelters or forage/hunt for food, they just slept outdoors, tanned by the beach and ate whatever supplies they were given when they were left on the island. The producers had to split the men and women up and mix them together after it became obvious that the women were going to fail miserably. I know it's a small sample size, but that's the closest thing I've hear…
/r/MensRights21/04/14 12:07 AM
5

Give men a holodeck and an artificial womb and we'll see who needs who. Last I checked, there aren't any articles complaining about "where have all the good women gone".
/r/MensRights21/04/14 12:04 AM
1

She can practice castration on her husband/boys if she ever gets them. But I have a feeling she'll change her tune by then.
/r/MensRights18/04/14 04:58 AM
3

They're a bunch of anti-abortion atheists who want to legalize marijuana.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 04:47 AM
16

Someone trying to pander to women, same way politicians do it. Except politicians actually have something to offer.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 02:48 AM
1

Comments disabled. If that's not a feminist call sign I don't know what is.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 11:31 PM
2

What they fail to mention is if you decide to leave the company because you hate the job, you'll keep getting paid (child support). And if you're with the company for a certain amount of time, you'll get half their profits (alimony). And after 5 years you'll get free service (school and television), drastically reducing your work requirements.
/r/MensRights15/04/14 09:28 PM
1

That was awful. What made me feel really bad was that guy who committed suicide. He felt like an obvious failure, in a system where he was destined to fail. And his father trying to help only made him feel worse. I'm not going to pretend I know what he/they were going through, but that shit is awful. Everything about it, from his point of view, the father's, the families, everything. Shit is fucked and I don't even know what to say.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 05:14 AM
2

No shit. They should pay the legal bill and force the woman who accused him to pay any other costs. He not only had his life ruined to some extent, but went through a year of hell. The question is, what would someone agree to, to go through that shit, false rape accusation, destroyed reputation and all. How much would the average Joe agree to? How much would someone who's well off ask? That's what she should have to pay.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 04:31 AM
4

You need two people to tango. If one decides to take a seat, have a drink and relax, what exactly are women going to do? Assuming women aren't turning into lesbians, how are they going to get married if they can't find a guy who will propose? If every woman on the planet wanted to get married, and every man on the planet refused to get married, there would be 0 marriages.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 04:01 AM
11

There's a lot more reasons than that. There was a guy here a while back talking about getting divorced. His wife cheated on him, had a kid with another guy, and left. But she didn't stop there. She had another kid with another man, then another with a different guy. Now he wanted to split up for good after 3 or so years of her going around and doing her thing. Here's the kicker. I tried to help him, so I looked up the laws (bible belt states) and any child born into a marriage meant that he was …
/r/MensRights14/04/14 03:57 AM
7

I honestly wonder sometimes how much feminism has hurt women in the sense that they just blame whatever problems/faults on men. It's a lot like the black community who acts like the "white man is keeping you down" while you dropped out of high school, have a few felonies on record, and anyone who does succeed does so because they "act white". It's easy to blame your failures on others, but that won't lead to success. The vast majority of the time, it's better to just own up to it and do whatever…
/r/MensRights14/04/14 03:30 AM
2

You live with 33 out of 100 points of privilege. You’re not privileged at all. You grew up with an intersectional, complicated identity, and life never let you forget it. You’ve had your fair share of struggles, and you’ve worked hard to overcome them. We do not live in an ideal world and you had to learn that the hard way. It is not your responsibility to educate those with more advantages than you, but if you decide you want to, go ahead and send them this quiz. Hopefully it will help. White m…
/r/MensRights13/04/14 04:42 AM
2

Affirmative action. Pretty much nobody could select the second option, especially if you travel.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 04:31 AM
7

She's loving every minute, especially now that she's got an article about her. And she's going to be one pissed off bitch at 40, the type that goes off on some lowly cashier at the grocery store. C'est la vie. That being said, this whole thread seems like a bunch of nagging about nothing.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 04:04 AM
5

I think your problem is that when women talk about "male privilege", they're talking about the top 1% of men. While when we're talking about female privilege, we're talking about what we see every day and statistically speaking, average. Yeah, most CEO's are men, but most men are not CEO's. On the other hand, I've seen far more women get away with fucking underage kids than face similar punishment as men.
/r/MensRights13/04/14 03:39 AM
-3

Well I don't disagree. Women should go back to the kitchen and make a sandwich. Not only will they have a sandwich for lunch, but they'll save money while going to work every day and hopefully fleshing out their career. And since we have too many people on this planet anyway, they have the unique opportunity to forgo having children while earning promotions left and right and keeping up with men in the workforce. It's a win/win really. Smash the patriarchy? Fuck that. Smash the pay-gap! Don't ha…
/r/MensRights12/04/14 06:01 AM
3

There was a law for that (like Poe's law) but I forget what it was called. Explained tumblr perfectly. Basically the more insignificant or petty something was, the more fervently someone argued for it. And I think this whole blurred lines bullshit really puts it into perspective. Just look at how feminists reacted to "I know you want it", that's it, that's where the whole outrage comes from. Yet when you look at 50 shades of grey, they defend the book vehemently.
/r/MensRights12/04/14 05:32 AM
1

It's speculation, but it's not exactly wrong. If it wouldn't affect women, then why give them affirmative action to begin with? We are creating laws to help women get jobs over men.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 10:19 PM
8

He was a religious preacher, I'm not sure if he was pro life or if it was about some other issue. She ended up getting something like community service.
/r/PussyPass07/04/14 05:10 PM
6

To be honest, most believe the rape bullshit. Just go to Russia or some eastern European country to see the difference. I've seen chicks here in the US HAUL ASS away from me, in very well lighted downtown areas within the view of their friends. I've also seen women in other places walk alone through a huge park in pitch black while wearing next to nothing and not being bothered by it or me.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 05:06 AM
3

Depending on where you live, simply being married to a woman who gives birth makes you the "father". Additionally, owing child support will have your passport revoked (assuming you have one). The simple truth is that the government doesn't want to pay or support her when they can make you do it, so it doesn't matter if it's your kid or not. And they also get some extra $$$ from the feds for every child support check out there. You also can't just become another citizen of another country. Canada…
/r/MensRights31/03/14 04:19 AM
-2

A few cases of old women being raped doesn't change the fact that the vast majority are young and most likely somewhat attractive. If rape was about power, we should see women in their 30's, 40's and 50's raped at a greater rate due to them being in the workforce. But we see the exact opposite instead. The same logic can be applied to passed out/drunk women. Why is it rape if a guy fucks them for pleasure when rape is defined as a power fantasy? Where's the power in that? Especially when she won…
/r/MensRights30/03/14 08:33 AM
0

That article proves nothing, nor anywhere within it does it cite an actual study. As for my feels, here you go. Note that on page 3 there's a neat little graph that shows that women from puberty to the age of 24 are most likely to be raped. Funny given the fact that men are in their horniest during this period and and women are at their most attractive phase. As for my comment, it has nothing to do with being a rape apologist or whatever you think of calling me in the future. I was simply pointi…
/r/MensRights30/03/14 07:36 AM
19

Wow, I can't believe she pulled the "It's not my job to educate you" line. She was given free reign to say whatever she wanted to defend herself, and she just took off. Isn't this at the core of her complaints? That her opinions aren't taken seriously? Why didn't she vocalize that to the world when she had the chance? Better run away from an argument and claim it was due to oppression.
/r/MensRights30/03/14 12:25 AM
3

Again? Man this guy loves me.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 09:05 PM
-2

It does have a lot to do with being attractive on the other hand.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 05:09 PM
1

Yeah but our companies still make and sell more games than anyone else.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 05:08 PM
3

Yeah right. How about, "why don't girls work out"? Every chick at my gym is hot as fuck, and those who squat are hotter than fuck. And I don't think I've ever heard a guy complain about "why do girls care so much about being skinny". That's like women complaining about men who care about looking good, having six pack abs, and dressing fashionably in expensive clothing while dining at a 5 star restaurant instead of picking their meal from the McDonalds Value Menu.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 08:45 AM
1

I honestly don't know how to believe that when you have things like this. The US is basically the number 1 gaming market in the world. Nobody else even comes close. So how the hell does an almost $100 billion market turn into $16 billion back home?
/r/MensRights29/03/14 04:55 AM
9

In 2011 the Video Game Industry took in over $16 Billion dollars but despite women representing 45% percent of the game playing audience they directed less than 2% of the Games. LOL what are we counting xbox sales? I know for a fact that Blizzard entertainment alone is pushing well beyond that. As of February 2014 the game has 7.8 million active subscribers. Source. At $15 a month, they make $1.4 billion a year. That's one company with one game. We're not talking expansion sales, or other games …
/r/MensRights29/03/14 02:59 AM
10

Why is it that I always see the hambeasts worried about rape and not the cute girls on the volleyball team?
/r/MensRights29/03/14 12:28 AM
14

Women are allowed to say it because men don't shame them. Just go ahead and say "no fat chicks" or "no curvy chicks" and be done with it. They have no power, just shaming language. When you stop letting that shaming language affect you, you'll be free to do as you please.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 06:28 AM
0

Women pretty much run Academia, not because they have a lot of power themselves, but because anything anti woman is seen as misogyny these days. Additionally they are persistent. If you are persistent, it doesn't take a lot to succeed in life, so eventually anyone who stands up to them will lose their career. On top of that 60% (and growing) of the people paying universities are women. To them it's a business these days, they don't care about teaching or advancing knowledge or whatever. They're …
/r/MensRights28/03/14 05:47 AM
48

You realize women love shaming language. Better to just ignore it and do whatever you want.
/r/MensRights28/03/14 12:13 AM
16

Look at that abused woman, protecting herself from the monster in her life.
/r/MensRights26/03/14 02:50 AM
2

I liked the video but the ending is kind of iffy. She's talking about something that we can't change. When a man can't attract a woman with his "beauty" or a woman can't attract a man with her degrees/career, it's not really sexism. It's nature. You can't change what people are attracted to, and if you argue that, then you better start telling people being gay is a choice.
/r/MensRights25/03/14 12:36 AM
1

I'm not attacking them for not cherry picking, I was the one doing the cherry picking. If you're going to cite something, then at least let everyone know where in that double or triple digit page citation is the part that you're referring to. Reading the title of a paper is as useful as reading the title of a news article. There's a lot of papers out there that go out to prove one thing and end up proving something completely different. That's the point of science, not to prove you're right but …
/r/MensRights24/03/14 10:18 PM
2

How old is she? There's a pic of a facebook post saying she's "worth jail time" making me think she's underage. And yes, you'd be surprised what underage girls look like these days.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 08:00 AM
-1

By your logic America is the poorest nation in the western world because it has no national health care. Fact is, that the US represents 1/3 of the world economy. Just because they don't have certain things (especially things that were before their time, the Ottoman empire was established before the black plague and ended after world war 1 began) doesn't mean they were poor or incapable of doing anything. The Roman empire and the British empire had none of those things, yet during their time the…
/r/MensRights24/03/14 07:51 AM
-1

Honestly, it's pretty fair. Nobody gives a shit about a cars mileage until you have to pay for it. That's why I always care about how many cocks a chick rode. I'm not going to buy a used up civic with 200k miles on it for $10,000, let alone pay full price and pretend it was new. I think men should start adopting this train of thought, it would definitely piss off a lot of women in the process. And to paraphrase Jimmy Carr, remember folks, domestic violence is wrong. You wouldn't scratch your own…
/r/MensRights24/03/14 07:42 AM
2

How about this one? Our findings are consistent the proposition that bias is affecting stock price. Female directors have negative effects on stock value and no effects on profits. The bias proposition is also supported by the wider pattern of effects of corporate board characteristics, namely, that they do not influence performance when all else is taken into account. Your link, your source, your research paper. How do you plan on shooting this one down?
/r/MensRights24/03/14 07:06 AM
1

Also, could you explain how the wealth of the West tied into the concept of the disposable male? I'm curious how much you really know about men's history. Men > Women. Feminists said so, and apparently (according to feminists) many men in the past agreed. Lesson over. /s
/r/MensRights24/03/14 06:57 AM
4

Yeah but you seem to be condescending towards the fact that a specific passage wasn't quoted so you "cherry picked" something from it like you're trying to prove a point. If angel actually took a passage out of context, then your reaction makes sense. Was the article offensive to you as a whole? Your reaction to someone referencing a paper and didn't cherry pick lines was quite weird and feels aggressive. Just wondering what you're trying to do or prove? I'm trying to prove that most people slee…
/r/MensRights24/03/14 06:51 AM
7

You didn't even read the first paragraph. Sure I did, the part I quoted is the last sentence in the first paragraph. Looks like you're the one who hasn't even bothered reading the paper you linked to.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 04:50 AM
4

And yet, all of the countries in the western world were still very wealthy before feminism came about. And how would someone explain the Ottoman Empire? It's one of the largest and longest lasting empires in the world. Under Islam no less, and you know how those guys feel about women.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 04:26 AM
4

Because people shouldn't have to read an entire research paper to see what a single comment on reddit is trying to prove. It's very sloppy. And I didn't use word tricks, I used a reputable source and quoted a specific passage.
/r/MensRights24/03/14 04:08 AM
3

I'm not going to read an entire research paper for the lulz. Note that even the references link to specific parts. Why don't you start doing that?
/r/MensRights24/03/14 03:04 AM
10

Since you don't feel like quoting the relevant part from your source, I'll just go ahead and cherry pick one part. This suggests that the association between board diversity and performance identified in cross-sectional studies is spurious; a consequence perhaps of the fact that successful firms appoint women to their boards. It seems a lot like the education and wealth correlation. Countries that educate women are wealthy. Yet one could say that only wealthy countries can afford to educate wome…
/r/MensRights24/03/14 01:44 AM
2

The same reason feminists keep pushing all of that sex trafficking bullshit about major sporting events and regular prostitution. Demonize men, even if it hurts the real people who need help. And no, the stories are not abusive enough. Ever see rape on TV? Ever see how rape is being advertised? It's never fucking your girlfriend when she says no, it's always stranger rape in an alley, even when that's the rarest and most violent type.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 02:39 AM
1

I can apparently own that domain for $9.99.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 02:37 AM
5

Wasn't someone murdered last year in the UK for the exact same shit? These women are not only guilty of libel/slander but are also putting a man's life in danger.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 02:26 AM
15

I never understood why feminists (if they actually cared like they claimed) didn't try to fight this. Even if false accusations are only 8% or whatever they claim, there are only so many police resources. Because they were busy investigating this claim, they weren't investigating a real one. So for every false accusation a real woman isn't getting her justice and a real rapist gets to rape another day.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 12:35 AM
1

Although Anorexia is pretty bad, I'm willing to bet that men using steroids (because of how they see themselves and their bodies) not only occurs more but can be more fatal. I'm not trying to bash on what the news are doing, but just trying to point out that we don't really hear about how men destroy their health (and there's quite a few ways) in order to attract women. I've been working out and keeping up with the whole bodybuilding thing for, well about half of my life so far. And it's amazing…
/r/MensRights14/03/14 06:30 AM
1

But how many women who focused on their careers instead of starting a family are trying to warn women younger than them to avoid doing what they now regret doing? I mean there are some, but they've all been met by backlash. And yet we still have "where have all the good men gone?" articles turning up. I don't think women will change until we're way past this day and age and past what's starting to happen right now. To a lot of people we're still living in the 60's, where marriage is great, where…
/r/MensRights14/03/14 06:12 AM
0

Back when I was in high school it was something like 95% of rapes go unreported and 6% of rapists go to jail, basically giving you something like a 99.7% chance of avoiding punishment for rape. Now I don't know about you, but usually people don't go around saying that unless they want to encourage crime. Cops (let's make up some numbers) don't go around saying 70% of murders remain unsolved, 95% of bank robberies are successful and they never arrest the people, and 99% of drug dealers never run …
/r/MensRights14/03/14 05:30 AM
1

Unless it happens tomorrow.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 04:13 AM
1

The only worrying thing about this is the trend it follows from this experiment. I would definitely call these guys "the beautiful ones" (referred to at 3:37, but I suggest you watch the whole video).
/r/MensRights14/03/14 03:35 AM
1

If Germany is equal, they have to take trade schools into account.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 01:32 AM
-1

It's one of those things that is probably too complicated to answer in a thread posted a few hours prior. Honestly, I feel bad for the father, but I also don't think a mother should be forced to have the kid just because the dad wants to. Nature has made this specific problem more complex by only having the mother bear the child. So only one person is involved in actually making the kid (fuck our laws and everything else for a moment).
/r/MensRights12/03/14 09:45 AM
7

I became an MGTOW and stopped giving a shit. Don't get me wrong, I'll still support single fathers and divorced men, but not giving a shit has really freed me. Shaming language has absolutely no effect on me anymore. Oh and it has made me very good at finding sources for arguments. I no longer argue based on feelings and assumptions, now I actually cite sources when I have to. And I suppose it has made me aware of all of the double standards and saved me from Athiesm+, which I'm sure I would hav…
/r/MensRights12/03/14 09:41 AM
2

The revelations are fueling criticism of the Obama administration’s efforts to tamp down on obesity and tobacco use. Critics say those efforts have routinely included illicit uses of federal funds. Yeah, so "good" and healthy food will still cost more than the cheap canned shit. Oh and everything will still be full of high fructose corn syrup. But we'll curb obesity! I'm sorry but this is coming from a guy who thought the best way to solve the healthcare crisis was to dump the cost on the youth.…
/r/MensRights12/03/14 08:56 AM
5

Not all relationships are about sex. To some of these guys, they genuinely believe that by being nice, they'll get the relationship where they mutually care about each other and look out for one another. The sex is just something that's part of the relationship, not something that defines it. You can date and love someone without having sex. Just like you can have sex with someone and not really care about them emotionally in any way whatsoever. And I think that these guys want the former, then …
/r/MensRights12/03/14 06:02 AM
4

Well, I don't see why we shouldn't apply the logic to both groups. Ever see a woman who refereed to herself as "strong, independent, intelligent, educated, kind, etc"? Same shit. Women who do that are doing nothing short of selling you a lie. Better to just ignore them.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 05:42 AM
0

Im still not getting the entitled part... I think you need to re-read op's post (the comic) then my comment at the very top. You're pretty much the "nice girl" I was talking about. Maybe try flipping the genders and instead of "I didn't rape you" switch it with "I didn't force you to date me".
/r/MensRights12/03/14 05:07 AM
6

Many do like genuinely nice guys, sure. But like the comic says... if you're only "nice" because you think it's going to get you laid, you're not being nice. You're just being manipulative and selfish. I think a better analogy would be being told to go to college if you wanted to be successful. And after going to college, you became underemployed and miserable. You didn't go to college because you were smarter than the rest, or you had a passion for your major, you did it to become successful. I…
/r/MensRights12/03/14 04:08 AM
24

I've got a question for any women out there. Yes, this happens. Yes some guys are pissed, but they're pissed because they're told that women like nice guys. So if a guy isn't an asshole, and acts the way women trained him to, I think he's justified in believing that maybe he's a good "catch". Not that women owe him sex or a date, but it does get confusing when women say "we want x" and when a guy does everything to become "x" and there's a lack of women in his life, it is quite frustrating. That…
/r/MensRights12/03/14 01:48 AM
35

Of course, SNL is a comedy sketch show and it was clearly a parody of MRAs. It wasn’t meant to be the movement’s manifesto. I don't get it, how is it comedy if you pretty much flip the stance of what a group stands for 180? Maybe I should have a sketch about how feminists are pro rape, against letting women have abortions, and how keeping women out of higher education is good for them.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 11:35 PM
1

Except for the fact that there are more women having kids than men. I have no idea what the numbers are today, but in the 18-25 (or so) range back in 2000 there were more than twice as many women who had kids than men. How about asking these women to stop having kids outside of committed relationships? I have yet to hear anyone blame the mother's for anything.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 10:26 PM
0

First of all, I think looking at people in a bar isn't very representative of the world. Try looking at how people are various wealth levels are doing vs attractive people and if being attractive would actually compensate for a $150k salary. See 20 year old women vs 30 year old women. Any man would rather have an attractive 20 year old to start a life with than an attractive 30 year old. That's not just 10 extra years of her being hot, but 10 of the best years where she's at her peak. Why is a n…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 08:43 AM
2

But you have to kidnap these kids, feed them, take care of them (to some extent) and they would seem harder to ship than drugs. A kilo of coke costs something like $700 to make, but if you were to sell a kilo for $20,000, cut it once 50/50 and it's $40,000. I don't see how these trafficked girls could be more profitable. And if I remember correctly, in 1.8 months you can grow 1 pound of weed in 1 square foot (about $4000). I mean the US fought wars using drug money. So I just don't see the profi…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 07:26 AM
5

So selling young girls is more profitable than selling drugs or weapons, and yet it's a $39 billion a year industry across the world. Didn't the drug cartels launder over $400 billion a few years back? And that's only the Mexican ones, not the other crime organizations from around the world. I'd believe this garbage if it was more believable. These are the same people who go around telling us there's 100,000 prostitutes being trafficked into the town where the super bowl is hosted, and the cops …
/r/MensRights11/03/14 06:03 AM
10

Money. You're looking at dropping more money than what most people have saved for retirement (if I remember correctly, 50% of boomers have less than $12,000 in savings). You can't sue if you don't have money and most people don't have the option to piss (nor want to) that much money down the drain. What should start happening at the very least, is to send these women the bill if it's proven they lied and wasted everyone's time. Let them spend the next 20 years paying for a lie.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 05:18 AM
2

I don't think it's a dislike of sexuality, just a lack of agency. We don't give women agency and other women won't give women agency. A 16 year old boy fucking a 28 year old teacher knows exactly what he's doing. A 16 year old girl fucking a 28 year old teacher was seduced and groomed to fuck him. She would have not done so of her own free will, at least what society believes.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 12:33 AM
2

Unless they have both. But usually, see jocks vs nerds. No reason jocks are richer, just fit. If you ever want to see the discrepancy, go to a night club. The nerd earning $150,000 a year won't even exist to most women. The bartender on the other hand will take 15 minutes off his shift to fuck the hottest girl in the room. Wealth is a shortcut for long term relationships with women, but that doesn't mean she won't fuck the pool boy when you're at work. There's a reason kings and nobles of the pa…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 05:42 AM
13

Probably because his ramblings can be quoted from any comments section of any article that has a female teacher who fucked her underage student(s).
/r/MensRights10/03/14 05:13 AM
3

44 minutes in, watch it here.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 02:25 AM
1

Why? Any shaming language should not only be ignored by men, but it should be seen as a testament to your ability. Shaming language is usually brought up only when people have no other argument. If SRS and all the feminists out there want to call me a virgin and whatnot, so be it. At least then I can call them out on their bullshit about how I treat my women like objects, after all, I never had any women. Man up? Be a real man? I don't care. Male tears? Uh, short of bitching, never seen a man cr…
/r/MensRights09/03/14 06:53 AM
1

The 'skinny' descriptor is fine, but then you used 'petite.' I'm not sure how you differentiate the two, depending on how you do could be construed as a fetish. The red flag was 'womanly.' I don't really know how to explain it. Petite to me just means "small" as in, not heavily overweight with a small frame. Asians after all are usually shorter. I don't care if she's skinny or built (not threatened by a "strong" woman). To give an example, I see Jamie Eason as petite, but I definitely wouldn't m…
/r/MensRights09/03/14 03:16 AM
3

You're skirting a thin line here. Why? Am I supposed to like fat women over skinny ones? And after all, ignoring race is something we've been told to do our entire lives. Racism is wrong, etc. Asians are just statistically more likely to be thin. It's no wonder more men are attracted to Asian women. I think the religious right is the biggest enemy of legalized sex work and porn. Sex-positive feminism seems more about making sure sex workers are not exploited. They don't want shit to turn out lik…
/r/MensRights08/03/14 05:41 PM
7

I posit that normalized, legal, and safe prostitution could lead to better and more honest relationships between men and women because the bullshit bob and weave that is the current standard among them will disappear nearly entirely when necessity lacks. The problem with this is that women would need to improve, and I don't mean education and career. Women would need to start offering more than just sex. And I get the feeling women are perfectly happy being approached by men, wined and dined, wh…
/r/MensRights08/03/14 08:43 AM
5

Because pedophilia implies someone who is attracted to prepubescent children. So, unless something weird is going on, a high school teacher could technically never be a pedophile for being attracted to his or her students. Most kids go through puberty by the age of 14 these days.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 08:20 AM
18

Two reasons. The "real" reason is because white men are fetishizing Asian women (for their obedience obviously, not that they could ever be attractive, skinny, petite and womanly). The actual reason, and more realistic one, is that white women in the US don't like competition. It's like the whole mail order bride thing, men are getting women from over seas because they can't tolerate the US women. It's a loophole that women want closed. You either deal with their empowered, strong womyn bullshit…
/r/MensRights08/03/14 07:48 AM
4

I wonder if they'd let me drive if I was nearly sober. But I do have to say I'm surprised at how those students reacted. Never in my life would I have imagined high school students saying what they said.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 07:41 AM
11

Heard about it from people complaining. Mainly things like how terrible it represents the BDSM community and how people in the story were mistreating things like safewords.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 03:26 AM
1

Like this.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 02:06 AM
42

Feminism is about breaking female gender roles, not male ones. Men are still expected by feminists and society to uphold their side of the bargain. A bargain that women walked away from a long time ago. Why do you think some feminists are still asking men to bring back chivalry? Why are men expected to protect women from rape and everything else? Why do they keep telling us that refusing to even consider dating single moms is sexist, while they can go around and drop a laundry list of demands yo…
/r/MensRights08/03/14 01:47 AM
2

I don't get why people are downvoting this. This article isn't about men vs women, it's showing that there are fundamental problems in our world. Not just human males are affected by this, but virtually all males of other species as well. We're polluting our planet and fucking up life as we know it. And it's affecting primarily males.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 12:26 AM
2

Not a Feminist Did you also click the do coke on a weekend night option? They know that's all we do.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 11:53 PM
0

Men don't care. If a guy see's a fit model, he'll think "I should diet and exercise if I want to look like that someday", not "society is body shaming me".
/r/MensRights07/03/14 11:45 PM
2

Do you mean the Mens Rights Movement when you say MRM? Yes. It is like the men's right movement is saying that everything the feminists do and believe is bad, in a bit like the feminists seem to believe that everything the men's right movement say is bad. Of course it's probably just minorities within feminism and mens right movement that have these type of believes. Minorities in the feminist movement only insofar that most people who claim to be feminists don't really know what feminism is, sh…
/r/MensRights07/03/14 04:44 PM
3

In a sense that's exactly what the MRM is about, and just look at all the open arms we've been met with. I don't see anyone replacing them anytime soon.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 03:11 PM
7

Well, until women and feminists decide to accept the truth and try to deal with this, there will always be a glass ceiling. Not only was there that study posted recently that stated women don't work well in a hierarchy, but they seem to actively stifle one another.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 02:20 AM
12

Not while organizations like NOW represent women or the feminists in the EU (I forget what they're called). They're more interested in keeping women on top (NOW shooting down bills that end lifetime alimony and make shared custody the default) and equal outcome over equal opportunity (EU and their job quota's for women in high ranking corporate positions). To give another example of hypocrisy, a few years ago women's groups shot down a bill that would keep those accused of rape anonymous until c…
/r/MensRights07/03/14 01:01 AM
2

I want to pay for that woman to meet boys. That way, in 5 years she can complain about how all men are boys and asking "where have all the good men gone?".
/r/MensRights06/03/14 03:09 AM
5

And in a decade or two they won't be relevant anymore.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 02:45 AM
-2

Who is most vulnerable? young women between 16 and 24 are exposed to the most sexual crimes and harassment. Rape isn't about sex, or fucking women when they're at their most attractive, it's about power. I still don't buy it.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 01:05 AM
28

Close, but no cigar. Women wear makeup and dress up for other women. They said so themselves, so it must be true.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 07:37 AM
21

I think he should post it. We keep complaining about how the equity feminists allow the gender feminists to hide amongst their ranks by saying "not all feminists are like that". But they don't do shit against the radfems. We need to get our shit together and fight the radical MRA's. Simply saying "not all MRA's are like that" isn't good enough and would make us hypocrites.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 06:23 AM
2

But the patriarchal open source movement is still keeping our womyn down. We need to push to have open source pay women so that more of them will be willing to contribute. And no, I wasn't the one who came up with that idea. And yes, I'm being sarcastic.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 06:08 AM
41

I literally put her life on the line, just because I felt like making some mini-me's. And don't forget, made her suffer. And fucked over her career since she has to bear the children and care for them, literally imprisoning her and making her dependent on me so she can never leave. I'm a monster.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 06:02 AM
85

Seduction and charm are both forms of manipulation. When you "seduce" and "charm" a woman into your bed, you're just manipulating her. Since you had to manipulate her to get her into your bed, you did so without her consent. Ergo, you raped her. That hot girl you never had a chance with, but you swept her off her feet, dated for 4 years and have been married to for 5. The kids you had with her, etc. You're literally raping her every day. And not just raping, but stealing her freedom. By convinci…
/r/MensRights05/03/14 05:56 AM
6

I don't get it? If women want to stare at men's crotches, that's not my problem. If you're out in public, don't expect the same privacy you get in your house or in a bathroom.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 05:04 AM
3

Not every place has palimony or common law, but I think the places that do will have it even worse. People will stop cohabitation and may even limit the length of their relationships.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 07:09 PM
6

Tell ya what, let's introduce equality into the mix. Put everyone's resume into this database, but instead of putting their name and anything that would give us their gender, just put their resume and some designated number. Then let everyone pick from that pool as they see fit.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 05:27 AM
1

That still doesn't prove that women are the majority of spenders (not to mention 85%), just that women are easier to cater to. How do you sell shit to men? I love to buy shit from newegg and Amazon, but guess what, I'll do some heavy research before I buy. That means that commercials don't work on me. And I only buy what I deem is necessary. It's like going to Nordstrom Rack. It's full of women, because of the "great deals". But to me, something that's $20 that used to be $150 is still a $20 ite…
/r/MensRights04/03/14 04:49 AM
0

That doesn't prove that women control 85% of spending. I know guys who spend $50-100 grand on their custom exotic cars. Putting in all kinds of improvements, paint jobs, sound systems, etc. Nowhere will you see that spending going on, since it happens either online, or by phone. The same applies to me. I do the vast majority of my shopping online. If women actually did control 85% of the money, there would be more studies done and more sources out there. Every major corporation would be very int…
/r/MensRights04/03/14 04:34 AM
4

That's the only place on the internet that has those "facts".
/r/MensRights03/03/14 11:01 PM
1

Tell your university that they should instead cut tuition for the girls by 25% this year for their "awareness campaign". Let's see if they'll agree to that.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 11:00 PM
1

I think he was equating abortion to murder and that murder is worse than rape. So how is one legal and the other illegal?
/r/MensRights03/03/14 07:56 PM
3

Then why do they complain about a "war on women" when people bitch about abortion and free birth control? If it's about being equal to men, removing those rights and privileges would make them equal to men.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 06:53 AM
1

I don't get why she's demanding that we just change everything for women's benefit. Why don't they create their own corporations and design the workload to cater to women? Why is it always "men need to do x" instead of "women, let's do x"?
/r/MensRights02/03/14 07:01 PM
1

Women aren't the company--YOU are. Women are the applicants to YOUR company, they're applying to be a part of YOUR life. You don't change your life around for others any more than a company changes its industry standards simply based on the applications it receives. There's no "getting your foot in the door" with PEOPLE--people aren't goals to be achieved, they're individuals to be interacted with. You know how I can tell you don't know how to interact with real people? Men are the ones doing th…
/r/MensRights02/03/14 08:24 AM
1

I'm perfectly respectful of women--I treat them just like any other person. You don't. Example: I can tell, you should work on your manners. Yes--probably about a million eligible women in NYC, and you've prejudged them all. That's so intensely respectful. Prejudged them based on their dating profile. They put everything in there willingly. No, you really aren't. You know how you can tell when people are looking to be serious about something? THEY PURSUE IT. College students spend days without s…
/r/MensRights02/03/14 07:44 AM
1

First of all, stop referring to women as vaginas, sluts and bitches. The least you could do is be respectful. Second of all, I'm not desperate to get laid or justify anything. I don't measure my self worth by how many women I can sleep with, or how many relationships I can have. Women aren't anything special, and you shouldn't be treating them as such. I'm not. I realize half the population are women, but that doesn't mean anything. There's a lot more at work here than just gender. Calling bulls…
/r/MensRights02/03/14 07:18 AM
1

Bucharest is pretty, but there aren't enough jobs there. Or at least any jobs other than factory-floor jobs you don't want and high-level consulting jobs you probably can't get. Maybe I just know the right people, I don't know. But I have a few cousins that live in the country. One in Timisoara working as a software developer making $5000 a month (well 5000 euro). He has his house paid off, his cars paid off, and can't spend all the money he makes. Another is living in Bucharest and they're mill…
/r/MensRights02/03/14 06:31 AM
1

Are you exactly the same as every sex-hungry white knight mangina? So why do you assume every woman, or even the majority of women, are gold-digging whores and entitlement queens? Shaming language won't work on me. Just an FYI. Why do you not even give them the benefit of the same doubt and possibility of difference you ascribe to yourself? Because I actually you know, have to deal with this. Not only when pursuing women, but I got years of experience first hand working at night clubs. Women do …
/r/MensRights02/03/14 05:26 AM
4

Or it's feminists version of slut shaming. Marriage rates are fucked, "good" women can't seem to find any good men, and hook up culture is rampant. We already know feminists are against porn and prostitution and would ban it yesterday if they could. I wouldn't be surprised if this is just another step in the long line of vilifying male sexuality and giving women more power with sex. Men can't get good relationships, not with common law marriage and fucked up divorce courts. So they'll settle for…
/r/MensRights02/03/14 04:48 AM
1

By women. If you want to date them, most expect the guy to pay. If you want to have kids with most of them, you're expected to work. Most women don't tolerate stay at home dads. I'm not operating on a persecution complex, I'm just stating that women in general want men to be chivalrous and to do things for them. If you're fine with the fact that you won't date, have sex, or get married, then you can do whatever you want. But if you have certain goals in life, that include sex, family and childre…
/r/MensRights02/03/14 04:39 AM
2

The thing is, no matter where you live, men are still expected to follow their gender roles. Even in places where women shed theirs 50 years ago.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 04:19 AM
1

I don't think you understand so I will explain it as best I can from my perspective. The whole gender roles and traditionalism thing is not my idea. But 50 some years ago women shed their gender roles while men are still expected to live by theirs to this very day. The whole woman belongs in the household while the man works isn't something strange or something I necessarily agree with, but at least, if I'm going to be expected to do X, then the woman should do Y. Men are still doing X while wom…
/r/MensRights01/03/14 07:21 AM
1

I doubt Russia is willing to risk the clusterfuck for some extra land. It honestly gives them no advantage and no extra resources to invade Eastern Europe. Short of maintaining what they already have, they would have little incentive to send in troops. But at least a man being expected to be the head of the household, a provider, etc a man would get something out of it in those countries.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 06:33 AM
1

Neterlands, Scandinavian countries mainly are heavy in pro feminism and only make the buying of sex illegal. I didn't go with Saudi Arabia because they're batshit insane. Eastern Europe offers the best of both worlds. Hot, sane girls, no feminism, a low divorce rate and proper gender roles. As long as you live there.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 06:24 AM
1

You forgot about /r/gonewildhairy, another subreddit standing up to the patriarchy by showing young women that they don't have to look like they're 12 down there. Because we all know that men only like hairless women because they look prepubescent.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 03:41 AM
5

Well I tell everyone every day not to marry. So welcome to my world? I don't disagree with her reasoning, it's exactly the same reasoning I use. People shouldn't marry and they should learn something about the law, like what their common law marriage laws and obligations are like. What happens to your ass if you act as a fatherly figure towards the kids of the single mother you're dating, etc. You wouldn't want to have the long dick of the law up your ass, so you might as well learn how to avoid…
/r/MensRights01/03/14 03:35 AM
1

Last week, police said they were investigating whether the teen could be hit with a felony charge of defamation Finally the cops are investigating a false rape claim! We're winning! /s
/r/MensRights01/03/14 12:56 AM
1

I'm saying it's easier for women. Get knocked up, you're out of there. And there's more than plenty of men eager to have sex. What exactly can a guy do to get sent back, short of dying? Once the choice is made, men have to deal with it. Women can pick between becoming a mother or risk dying in a war zone. I don't know if women are statistically more likely to seek excuses, but given how the navy and air force put out that false allegation disclaimer, who knows.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 12:46 AM
3

Most people who refer to themselves as charming, successful, kind, clever, witty and faithful have no such qualities. I always ask people, does Bill Gates brag about his success? Does Stephen Hawkins brag about his intelligence? Did Mother Teresa brag about her kindness? If you have these qualities, you let them speak for themselves. It's like the girls on dating profiles that say "I don't like drama". If you didn't like drama, you wouldn't be sick and tired of it, nor mentioning it in a fucking…
/r/MensRights01/03/14 12:41 AM
1

Any lady that played for her school's rugby team and can carry around the gear can go shoot people as far as I'm concerned. More women in the military that are just as qualified as the men is fine in my book. I think the issue is that women will mysteriously find themselves pregnant and be shipped home when shit hits the fan, a lot like Iraq.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 12:11 AM
7

A minor effort to help black's and Hispanics is deemed "discrimination" as if there were some conspiracy of white oppression at work. The very idea of helping people whose claim to fame is being among the very the worst off groups in America is attacked as a threat to race relations. You act like people were being racist, but the fact is that a program only focusing on a certain race, rather than a group of people who need help is inherently racist itself. But that's not the point. You come here…
/r/MensRights28/02/14 08:15 PM
3

Just don't get married.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 06:22 PM
30

Oh god. I almost attended that university. Almost chocked when I read the name. Also, women are objects for men to take? Really? I didn't realize blowing tons of money on a woman, constantly walking on egg shells around her, always trying to entertain and impress her, only to maybe get laid every once in a while was "taking". I hope men read this and follow the advice. The less attention men give women the better everyone is off. Oh and I just did a quick check since they always make a big deal …
/r/MensRights28/02/14 06:06 PM
2

Probably Russia or some eastern European country. Feminism hasn't really taken off there, but you still have shit like child support and alimony. But at least the divorce rates are pretty low compared to the west. China also made it a law where a man who has his own place won't get fucked and have it taken from him in a divorce. Chinese women weren't too happy with that call.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 03:59 AM
2

That's funny, Passport. Less than 10% of Americans travel over seas, and given how many immigrants are in the US, I'm willing to bet even fewer US born citizens travel. I as an immigrant travel plenty, but because I have family over seas, not because I want to smell the piss covered streets in Paris. And I like how basically everything on this list just screams "spend more money".
/r/MensRights28/02/14 03:17 AM
5

Drunk during mid day, wow. Living the life I see. Also probably not a good idea to get involved if you are a man. People are going to learn that giving women the power of false accusations and backing them with police force will create a new generation of apathetic men.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 02:41 AM
3

No, it's because the patriarchy states right there in their guide to the patriarchy that only skinny women are attractive and fat women should be shamed to all hell and back. These women who were picking on her were doing so because of their internalized misogyny. It's not my job to educate you shitlord.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 02:22 AM
3

Well, it's nice to know if I see anyone wearing any of these items, I can just avoid them. Just saved myself some time. Wish them the best of luck in selling their merchandise.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 01:52 AM
8

Not sure, but one thing I don't think these numbers show is the men who have to pay child support/alimony. On paper they might look like earning something like $20-30,000 a year and aren't in poverty. While the ex wife might earn $10,000 a year, have 2 kids and look like she's in poverty. But once the wealth is transferred from him to her, she might be fairly well off while he's in poverty. Thus on paper she's in poverty and he isn't, but in reality he's giving her money and now he's the one in …
/r/MensRights27/02/14 08:02 PM
9

To some extent it does. Politicians know women are easy to buy as voters and they are also the majority. Addressing real issues could result in failure and loss of career, but focusing on women will not only make women happy, but some men as well. Do you really think Obama, the president of the US and leader of the western world really believes women make 77 cents on the dollar due to sexism? He's not only smarter but more well informed than most people. But by pandering to women, you can buy po…
/r/MensRights27/02/14 07:38 PM
12

How about the shitty economy? The fact that after every "recession" more men lose jobs than they get back afterwards. We've got insane debt that's crippling our nation. Health care isn't going anywhere, especially since they want to dump the majority of the cost on the young, who are burdened by student loan debt, underemployed and are pretty much shit out of luck across the board. That would be a start.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 07:28 PM
1

Smart Girls Don’t Fall For Mr. Potential Complaining about all the good men are either married or gay in 3...
/r/MensRights26/02/14 03:41 AM
5

I knew girls that were also in love with some of my teachers. But if any one of them ever acted on it or showed the same interest, HELL ON EARTH would have opened up beneath their feat. One thing that's the problem with our society is that we see girls as victims but not boys. To a lot of people, even the feminists to some extent, they don't give girls agency. They treat them as if someone acted on them and they were helpless. As if they were manipulated. But the boys, they're fine, they can nev…
/r/MensRights25/02/14 10:03 PM
21

That's what happens when you only pay attention to the top 1% or so of men. They complain about the number of men at the top, while ignoring the rest. They act like every man lives like the men at the top, every argument is based around the opulence and privilege afforded only to those at the top. No wonder they're pissed. According to them, every one of us is living like Bill Gates, dining on Beluga Caviar, Lobster, filet mignon, and fresh seafood, all cooked up and prepared by our in house per…
/r/MensRights23/02/14 06:32 AM
10

No way. This chick is gold. Black and woman in the mother fucking tech industry. The only thing that could have made her a mother fucking unicorn would have been if she was disabled. These dudes were getting a 2 for the price of 1 bonus. Right up until she fucked their business. But until then, she was gold and they were lucky to get a piece of that affirmative action pie. Remember, it's cheaper to pay a black woman 1-1.5 the salary of your workers, than to have a black man and a (white) woman e…
/r/MensRights22/02/14 08:38 AM
2

She gave up on programming in kindergarten. But don't worry, she's a people person. Sure she may have destroyed a company and their reputation, not to mention put the entire tech world on edge, but let's give her a second chance. I'm sure next time, she'll only put the west coast on the edge after "Dongle Gate 2: The Bathshit meets crazy".
/r/MensRights22/02/14 08:33 AM
20

She did more for keeping women out of STEM fields, than any make believe patriarchal male ever could. The useless developer evangelist. The title alone should give you a clue. It would be like calling myself a pit stop, fashion developer, and being in the fashion re-development business for simply helping models change clothes and re-apply their makeup. I'm sure there's fancier names for these things, but seriously, I never cared about presenting myself or my job title as some insane shit like a…
/r/MensRights22/02/14 08:30 AM
1

Doesn't really change anything.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 01:39 AM
0

Rape is not about sex, it's about power. She used her power to force this 10 year old child to do something degrading, unsanitary, and something no adult would ever willingly do and she gained pleasure from doing so. She raped him. She raped this boy. Jennifer King Forshey is a child rapist.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 01:34 AM
2

Foot, meet bullet.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 01:28 AM
6

It would, but I have a feeling the government will never do that, since mommy will apply for whatever support she could, and then they'd have to pay.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 01:03 AM
3

Problem is that people do watch her show, probably concerned soccer moms, but who knows. Either way, she's rich and on the air for a reason.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 12:57 AM
28

He shouldn't have to pay more than half if she has 100% custody. So unless she's spending an additional $120k a year on her kids, totaling $240k a year, I don't think he should be paying that. Fuck this "scale" bullshit, kids aren't THAT expensive.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 12:13 AM
1

Earth mother? (Can't read the full article) But fuck earth mother. What a guy wants is a lady in the streets and a cock hungry slut in the sheets. And since women tend to treat sex as a weapon, they will freely give it to guys out of their league, and hold back when they meet men on their level (while ignoring the men below). Fortunately men are catching on . As for this "women's sexuality should be worshiped" earth mother crap, sorry but there are more women than men in the western world right …
/r/MensRights20/02/14 08:51 AM
0

Benevolent sexism isn't women's problem, although they will still complain about it. Anti sexism is only against those pathetic little men who dare to stare, or (gasp) hit on her. Women are no smart bombs after all. But the best is when you see articles written by feminists who start it with "yes I'm a feminist, but, let's give chivalry another try" as if chivalry was all about what only men did for women.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 08:28 AM
7

How does that work? When I lived in Canada they had some of the harshest DUI laws I've ever heard of. I knew a guy who as 20 (was allowed to drive alone at 18 I think) and due to a DUI (or a second DUI) his license was rejected for life. And she gets a fine? And if you pulled this shit on a cop it would be assault with a deadly women, probably indented murder. And she doesn't even get a domestic violence charge? Guess they gotta keep those statistics low. Richardson rejected the Crown’s call for…
/r/MensRights20/02/14 07:20 AM
1

Note that when these campaigns go around, it's never "men need to stop slut shaming" it's just generalized, because women realize the majority doing it are other women. As for your girlfriend or "sluts" in general, I don't really care. I mean yeah, it's bad. I'm sure if you barebacked her she would have just claimed it was yours, who knows. But I honestly don't think she deserves the name slut. I mean seriously, who goes out with someone on a date two hours after getting a load dropped inside th…
/r/MensRights20/02/14 06:32 AM
1

Couldn't really go past the 7 minute mark. A lot of women talking about a whole lot of "how I feel" and no facts. For example around the 7 minute mark (just before) the one with the crazy hair was talking about how we believe women who are making false kidnapping accusations more than we believe false (or real) rape accusations. Yet time after time the national news has been full of false rape cases. Some of which lasted a year or two. So how can these people claim these things aren't being take…
/r/MensRights20/02/14 06:26 AM
3

A lot of people believe it, and that's why you see videos of guys decking women and laying them out like a sack of potatoes. When you're raised to believe women are entirely just as capable as men in everything, and just as strong, you're not going to discriminate when some chick gets in your face.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 04:14 AM
1

I was actually jokingly attributing SF's high population of gay men to women being more demanding over there. I wish men could go gay at will.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 12:59 AM
1

One could replace the word "feminism" in the title with any other fearsome noun or 'ism'. Technically that's what they're doing. Here's an article with the sources cited. It's not necessarily going to happen, but it has been proposed.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 12:37 AM
-1

Pretty much this. Women have undone the way relationships worked in the past, but now they want to go back when it suits them? They can play hard to get all they want, and then complain about "where have all the good men gone?" all they want. Women's liberation meant women could go around and fuck anyone anywhere anyhow they wanted without repercussion. Now men are having their liberation and women are trying to keep the gender roles going. Men have absolutely nothing to gain from women who play…
/r/MensRights20/02/14 12:29 AM
1

Basically this: To a certain extent, the EU take a superficially benign and relaxed view towards how member states transcribe its “Directives” into National law – until a member state either fails to transcribe a Directive in a timely fashion, or transcribes it in such a way that does not meet with the approval of the EU. The feminists are pushing for certain things and every country in the EU has to basically incorporate those things into their laws. Things like criticizing feminism has already…
/r/MensRights19/02/14 10:38 PM
3

But what about the feelz?
/r/MensRights19/02/14 10:31 PM
4

It depends. Nobody's going to give you the real reason. But usually in countries like Germany where prostitution is legal, men are far less likely to buy women drinks and spend an exorbitant amount of time and money on them. After all, why drop $50-100 on a "date" and see where that leads when you can just get a good looking hooker and be guaranteed to get your rocks off. This of course is bad for women who want to be spoiled and gain access to a man's funds. And don't blame this on religion. Pr…
/r/MensRights19/02/14 10:14 PM
3

No wonder there's so many gay guys in SF.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 10:06 PM
2

Here. FTA: “I think the Latin culture in Florida really helps; people are warm, men smile at you on the street. They look at you. Men here, they don’t even turn their head to look at you.” The funny part is if you look through the pictures, you'll see one where 3-4 guys are checking them out.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 09:47 PM
4

Or a gag gift women can give their girlfriends. You can put anything you like in the product description. Would a dog collar with the term "Bitch" written on it be any different if the description said "Jewelry for strong, independent women"?
/r/MensRights18/02/14 09:37 PM
14

Yeah, but this looks like it's from a book.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 09:32 PM
7

There was one posted a while back about Vancouver where 3 lovely young ladies could not only not find boyfriends, but men didn't even look at them.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 09:30 PM
5

The data is old, but still relevant. So I'll just leave this and this here. There are more than twice as many moms than dads these days, and women are more than twice as likely to initiate divorce than men. So why are we blaming fathers? Oh that's right, women can never be held accountable for anything.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 09:09 PM
2

I'm not talking about Adria Richards, I'm talking about this shit in general.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 05:36 AM
1

Strangers? You spend 8+ hours a day with these people, 5 days a week for years. And harassment sexual or not these days if way too broad. You could be talking with a friend and if someone overhears something they don't like, they can report you for that. It's insane.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 05:05 AM
7

You obviously never had a lot of male friends if you don't know how men often treat each other.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 04:01 AM
8

It's saying that some of the things women see as sexism and harassment towards them is actually something that has been going on long before women joined the workforce. It's how men treated and treat each other. But when men treat women the same way they treat other men, women become outraged because they don't like it. The thing is that whether men liked it or not, it was part of the environment they joined and they dealt with it rather than complain. It's kind of like joining a track team and …
/r/MensRights18/02/14 03:57 AM
1

That's the point. It not only puts them at odds, but it might actually kill the 1 in 4 rapes lie. No way in hell is Academia going to sit by and get fucked in the ass and now way in hell are all those feminists and women's studies professors going to lose money. Not to mention if these colleges do post the data (which they usually do in the student handbook), it wouldn't line up with the feminist claims.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 11:24 PM
5

That's great. No double standards whatsoever. What happened to "protecting the children"? In our society women seem to be above children.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 10:11 PM
2

Meh. Every time I see someone use the word "mansplain" it just means my feels > your facts. It's a person who has nothing, who makes shit up left and right and argues on pointless facts. You'd be wasting your time arguing with someone like that. I could better spend my time getting advice on stock options from a homeless person in India.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 08:27 AM
1

But how does he pay the bills?
/r/MensRights15/02/14 08:24 AM
1

If feminists are so worried about rape in colleges, why don't they draw up a list? I mean according to their numbers, the rape rate is close to some of the worst parts of the world, like Southern Africa. Just make a list, show all the rapes at each college, the number of rapes, the number of students, the rape to student ratio, etc. And then keep neat little graphs over the years and let each student know the rape rate and the rank of that college in rapes, both while attending and during applic…
/r/MensRights15/02/14 07:22 AM
2

Note that she shoots down the last few decades of feminism by claiming there are biological differences between men and women. Accepting that some women want to be stay at home moms, and finally attacking academic feminists.
/r/MensRights15/02/14 06:48 AM
1

Well you see they don't find these men attractive because of some difficult to attain physical features. It's because they're confident.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 10:54 PM
2

I do not see any way outright debt forgiveness will be given. The wealthy will not accept not getting their money back. Nobody said they wouldn't be getting their money back. I said the government would pay it, through the tax payers.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 08:07 PM
3

I still don't get how people believe that cops/whoever won't believe women after having seen time after time all of these fucking false accusations make it to national news and get taken seriously. You think maybe that Brian Banks shouldn't have had his life ruined? But he did, on a false accusation no less. And now people are saying the cops don't take women seriously? Really? I honestly believe the people pushing this shit want to have the power to just point at a man and destroy his life, all…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 03:51 AM
2

No state or government will ever want to pick up the bill for some random kid. Especially when they can throw some man under the bus and actually make money from it.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 03:44 AM
1

"We're short on cash, so we'll only test it out on women to see if and how it stimulates the economy". Then just sweep it under the rug. Nobody will criticize it since they'd be alienating women, who are the major voter base and probably viewer base. Not to mention you'd be called a misogynist. Or "men earn more anyway, so they can afford it".
/r/MensRights14/02/14 03:35 AM
4

I've already been putting a lot of thought into this over the years and honestly, there's only one conclusion I can come to. Since these debts can't be shaken off, and women are "important" (aka voter base and whatnot), I can only see one thing happening. They're going to forgive the debt, but only for women. Sooner or later the banks, companies, and government will conclude that the women spending that money is better spent on the economy than given to banks. So they'll forgive their debt, tell…
/r/MensRights14/02/14 03:14 AM
2

This is 15-24. A quick google brought me to this site. It's a Divorce and Family Law site. According to their numbers, just over 50% of divorces (for men) happen in this age range.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 01:47 AM
1

I understand that, but I wasn't referring to it as "all Swiss love the system the way it is". The people in power don't care. The people who can change it have no intention of doing so. If they did, they would have done it years ago when the rest of Europe did it. There's nothing stopping them and I'm sure most of the common people aren't demanding boys spend a year or two in the army.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 01:07 AM
2

That's because most of those are due to divorce. I don't remember the stats exactly, but something like 18,000 out of 28,000 suicides each year are because of divorce.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 12:54 AM
1

Great, you know someone will see this picture, and begin claiming women make 59 cents on the dollar.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 12:25 AM
10

I've always thought it should be equal work for equal pay, not the other way around. Average up all the pay from the men at a company and pay the women the same, but demand that women also put in the same hours and work. So if Laura worked 40 hours this week but Bob worked 45, she's going to have to come in on Saturday and make up those 5 lost hours. And if she refuses, fire her. Let's end the pay gap ladies! We can do it!
/r/MensRights12/02/14 11:07 PM
5

Because the draft has been around since forever. A lot of european countries gave it up in the last decade or so, but some are still holding on to it. It does give women a head start, 1-2 extra years of experience and possible make it easier for them to be employed. But you're not going to have any rational discussions about this with anyone from those countries. The EU is proposing quotas for women in government and corporations, so they really don't care. Women are possibly on an even higher p…
/r/MensRights12/02/14 04:46 AM
1

You can read about it here. From that forum: I wouldn't take Nacho Vidal seriously. The dude lives with his parents and is over the age of 30. He got trapped by a psycho baby mom, has to pay heavy child support, and can only visit his daughter every 2 weeks. It's not the porn actor.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 12:43 AM
2

Take this to /r/mgtow. In fact, your site doesn't seem to match up with the ones linked in that subreddit, so I would be wary of this guy folks.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 07:05 PM
2

Dude, seduction is illegal now because gaming women should be illegal. Telling women what they want to hear, lying to them, bullshitting them, etc is literally rape. Hell, women can't consent to sex if they've had a drink or two. And you're trying to tell me they're perfectly capable adults who need to be treated as such? But treating them like adults can result in rape charges? And people wonder why men talk shit about women and won't approach them. And they act like they're being oppressed. Se…
/r/MensRights11/02/14 07:50 AM
1

By that logic, wouldn't Americans be the tallest people on the planet? And yet according to this map we're not even close. Hell if you look at obesity rates here, Mexico should be red, not green on the previous link. Perhaps extra food only contributes so much. But sure, stuff your face. I'm sure all of those fat acceptance tumblerinas are 6' or above. Oh and since women seem to only want taller men, I'm sure this would be counter productive. Unless you think it's cool to expand on the already g…
/r/MensRights11/02/14 04:19 AM
5

No. He just used his picture/name.
/r/MGTOW11/02/14 04:05 AM
-28

We're just here to protect your motherfucking kids. The same kids we'll be ready to pump full of holes in 4 years from now. But ignore the hot bitches like Debra Lafave, them hoes did our children a favor. There's nothing like some good, fresh, older teacher pussy these days. Next you'll be trying to press charges against female bosses harassing their employees and offering them raises for cheating on their wives. Lucky bastards.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 07:27 AM
0

Nope. I just want more rape accusations. Come on ladies, why settle for a few hundred a day. Let's get it up. Maybe a million, maybe 10 million. Let's clog up the system by attention whoring and trying to ruin innocent peoples lives!
/r/MensRights08/02/14 12:58 AM
0

Honestly, we need more rape accusations. I wish we could have like 50 million every day in the US. That would guarantee no rapist ever gets caught. Don't these women realize there's only so many police resources? If they're too busy chasing a ghost, the real deal can sit, relax and sip champagne.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 12:57 AM
3

Sounds like rape. Remember folks, rape isn't about sex, it's about power. And what I gather from this Do you know how much power that gives a girl? this What girl WOULDN'T want to use that power? this The surge of POWER that runs thru you after you kick a boy/guy in the balls is sooooo intoxicating. and this So... to answer the ques. if women enjoy kicking a man in the balls... there are a certain 'breed' of women out there that get great pleasure from it for the POWER it gives them and it shows…
/r/MensRights07/02/14 07:22 AM
11

Sexual harassment? This kid got it worse than some teachers who fucked their students.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 06:15 AM
2

Here's your diamond.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 06:14 AM
16

Didn't feminists fuck over the LGBT movement? I mean isn't that why we have /r/ainbow on reddit now? I wouldn't pay attention too much to this comic, seems like a fuckload of projection. Especially when SJW's are involved. I'm surprised this wasn't on tumblr.
/r/MensRights07/02/14 05:32 AM
2

I like it, the commercial that is. I really don't give a shit about this whole objectification bullshit feminists came up with. Truth is people find other people attractive. Just look at all the Twilight moms/girls and the team this guy/that guy (whatever their names were).
/r/MensRights07/02/14 01:13 AM
18

There was at least one, the guy who made it went to jail for a few months and was ordered to take it down. Here it is.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 10:38 PM
3

If I remember correctly, you have to have had it set as female for a while. You can't just switch the gender or make a new account and go on.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 10:34 PM
2

Why not just put all the food in the lunchbox, leave the lunchbox in the fridge and let her son pick it up from there? What a terrible mom.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 04:05 AM
1

Is this a straight translation or something? A lot of these sentences don't seem to make sense. The lawmakers explained that the use of a surrogate by a man may be attributed to the desire to fulfill his reproduction rights, and not to combat female fertility, which is unacceptable. So not allowing single moms is unacceptable but denying a man the ability to have a kid without a wife/woman is something they're striving for? Apparently in Russia you have to buy a cow if you want milk. Lawmakers a…
/r/MensRights05/02/14 01:23 AM
1

The second, being that tampons, pads, and other feminine hygiene products are “man” made inventions, intended to inadvertently rape a woman during her period, thus furthering her victim status as a woman living in a world run by men. But computers, cell phones, cars and all those other things we're going to keep on using, because life would be just too inconvenient.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 12:56 AM
8

Dumb-ass for sure, but if these two chicks were married, most laws state that any child born inside a marriage assumes the other partner is the father. So if these women were married, the one who didn't give birth should be held accountable.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 08:15 AM
3

Can't wait to sink my dick into some underage trafficked girl at the super bowl. Hell I don't even know what teams are playing, I'm just going there for the sex. Oh we're talking about domestic violence now? Fuck, guess I'll have to beat my hooker.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 06:59 AM
1

WTF am I reading? Why.. what?
/r/MensRights02/02/14 06:45 AM
11

Screw that, these guys want to put a box in your car that sends them info, for an indefinite period of time. I can see insurance companies of the future jumping on this. Forgot to wear your seatbelt? Your rates go up. Speeding for an emergency? Rates go up. Some douche cuts you off and you have to slam on the brakes? Rates go up. Have to pick up a drunk friends somewhere at night? Rates go up.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 05:04 AM
1

Although this one is about the UK, at least here in the US the boys who haven't gone to college won't have crippling debt for life. Hopefully this whole globalization thing becomes a failure and we can stop having everything made in China. That would add balance back to our economy.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 04:28 AM
7

I don't mean in the "let's leave /r/mensrights alone" but more of "that shit will cover 90% of our posts if we allow people to link to it" kind of shit.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 09:46 AM
-7

Pretty sure SRS has rules about linking to this subreddit.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 09:02 AM
1

Well it's not like men write magazines on how to "fix" their women. As for the fixing problems, that's usually something people do when they ask for help. You don't ask someone about what medication to take for X and then spend the rest of the day discussing how X feels.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 08:50 AM
2

“I really like you, and I think we should consider making our relationship more serious,” he understands that to mean: “I would like you to have sex with me one more time, before disappearing into the night, never to be seen again. I would also potentially like you to steal some of my underwear as a parting memento.” This isn't really "speaking different languages", it's men wanting to fuck. The top men, whether 1%, 5% or 20%, will always have more sex than the rest of the bottom 80% combined. A…
/r/MensRights01/02/14 03:45 AM
1

As OP stated, it's because they're not in the same category. I think calling men failures or deadbeats would be a better example, but even then, women seem to take cunt to the extreme when it comes to feeling insulted.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 02:03 AM
3

I think it's only parts they agree with. These things become so familiar and natural that they don't perceive them at all. Kind of like feminists takl about privilige. One of the biggest things is when you start dissecting life and assigning names to patterns, then you start seeing a bigger part of the picture. For example when I started reading up on PUA and how they pick up girls, I started noticing things I and my friends were doing that were completely natural and went completely unnoticed t…
/r/MensRights01/02/14 01:20 AM
19

Things haven't changed in 40+ years. I think feminism planned on fighting an uphill battle, got everything it asked for right away and then decided to stay relevant through lies and deceit.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 08:38 PM
22

Um, it says this thing is from 1985. That's 29 years ago.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 06:56 PM
4

I was going to point to the same comment, specifically this part. The fractional disparity statistic is being artificially created by comparing across different pay grades. It's amazing how people will buy the 77 cents per dollar BS, but then see the light when the same logic is applied to someone they support.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 05:31 AM
24

So ask her why feminists keep bitching about the number of CEO's and politicians who are male. Obviously these men are superior to women and deserve their positions, therefore feminists should just accept how things are. Same thing with the pay gap. Obviously men are not only better at earning money, but they are more valuable economically.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 03:21 AM
6

It's not about that, it's about getting the wife on board with it. A wife who doesn't cheat or cuckold her husband will be bad enough to deal with, I couldn't imagine what one who would be doing it would be like. Imagine telling this woman that you want a paternity test.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 07:54 AM
1

I think white women need to step down from leadership positions and learn to be quiet. Let WoC lead and work on issues affecting them, rather than allowing a highly well off group dictate the agenda. Never going to happen, why do you think feminism picked up in the first place? Example A, and example B. White women also need poor women, especially the richer white women. They need nannies and caretakers and maids while they go out and focus on their careers. You won't get that if everyone's midd…
/r/MensRights30/01/14 07:18 AM
8

How about get the money back and put the real dad on the hook. And if the mom doesn't know who the real dad is, then tough shit. Honestly, I'm up for paternity testing at birth or at least a week later. Make sure the doctors didn't switch your baby and make sure we know all of these things ahead of time. Why deal with the clusterfuck later on when you can get it out of the way now. But I suppose if men don't want to know, the doctor (in private) should ask them if they want to know or not, but s…
/r/MensRights30/01/14 04:59 AM
2

Shaming language it is. So when are we going to talk about the 100,000 child prostitutes being brought to the super bowl for the pleasure of men? People need to start wondering why men do what they do. Why they play video games instead of breaking their backs for women. Why they don't marry. Why they don't bend over backwards for women, etc. Perhaps because women and society give them no incentive to do so. There's nothing wrong with me or any other man wasting his life playing video games. But …
/r/MensRights30/01/14 02:00 AM
10

You can report spoofing here to the federal government. It's a crime and they take it pretty seriously. Additionally check your phone bill and ask your phone company for a copy.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 01:38 AM
17

If they had 90% then things like Olympic athletes who trained their entire lives would show it. Here's a quick example. Women's javelin weighs 3/4 of what men's weigh, and they only throw it about 73% as far. If we accounted for the weight, they would be around the 54% mark.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 07:43 PM
6

Is there a mirror? That site is slow as shit. I'm not watching a 30 minute video over a 5 hour period. edit So I'm trying to watch the video (8 min in so far) and someone starts laughing when it's mentioned that 100k men are raped every year at the 8:01 mark. edit These people are talking out of their asses. They don't want to recognize biological differences as natural. They say it's all patriarchal. Then it's mentioned that women and men are different (still unwilling to recognize it), that wo…
/r/MensRights29/01/14 07:36 PM
2

This seems like it belongs in /r/theredpill more than it does here.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 07:45 AM
3

I think this is more of a /r/tumblrinaction kind of thing. That being said, allow me to introduce you to a new law I learned about today.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 07:27 AM
51

Let women "have it all". I'm guessing they want women to get paid the same as men but working only 20-30 hours instead of 40+, so they can go take care of their kids. More maternal leave, etc. But I don't see that happening. Not unless we create sexist laws that say so, and even then. People don't seem to understand these days that they can't have it all, that if they want one thing, they'll have to give up another. They're acting like children who want both the Xbox One and the Playstation 4 fo…
/r/MensRights29/01/14 05:04 AM
8

I never got this argument. It's not always like this. I mean yes there's guys who feel entitled to sex for fixing some chicks computer. But there's also guys who are lead on. Girls who use these guys as plan B if she never finds anyone. She flirts, she acts like he's got a chance, and if he gets a girlfriend she'll act interested in him to the point where she wants to fuck him, right up until he breaks up with the other girl. Unfortunately the video has been removed (maybe someone else can find …
/r/MensRights28/01/14 06:28 AM
1

Actually impossible. The main giveaways are shoulders and forearms. Not even body builders on steroids have bigger shoulders or forearms than their heads. To give an example, using probably the most famous bodybuilder out there who used steroids to get to where he is in this picture. And it's no coincidence that women love broad shoulders and muscular forearms.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 06:04 AM
1

Can doctors refuse patients? If this jackass is making such a big deal about shit and you walk in as the wrong gender, just walk out and let someone else deal with it.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 04:11 AM
1

Men can't really do anything related to children. But women can do shit that affects the man. For example if a married couple has a child, if the wife has the child, the man is on the hook even if it's not his kid. If the man has a child and some other woman knocks it out, the wife is not on the hook.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 04:55 AM
-1

We're not talking about people making fries here, we're talking about huge investments. People who will need to be trained, mentored and follow a precise path. People who are difficult to replace. People who will take months to catch up and even start being productive, even if they have 10+ years work experience. The kind of shit where if a critical person leaves, a project could be delayed, costing millions of dollars and potentially putting other groups on hold until this shit gets resolved. I…
/r/MensRights26/01/14 02:55 AM
-2

I would expect an employer to hire based on an individual's qualification for the job, not their physical resemblance to other people who wouldn't want that job. That's never going to happen. Do people who offer car insurance look at every person who signs up for insurance differently? No. The 16 year old boy who just got his license will be paying out the ass compared to the 40 year old woman who switched insurance companies. Even if the 40 year old woman has a few accidents while the 16 year o…
/r/MensRights26/01/14 01:59 AM
2

Won't find them if you reverse/mirror it.
/r/MensRights26/01/14 12:37 AM
1

If they were even remotely fair about this, they wouldn't have come after this man. They would have gone after the lesbian mother's partner and held her accountable the same way men are held accountable when a child is born into their marriage and isn't theirs. Additionally it's a contract. The kid has no rights because the kid doesn't exist. No child out there has any guarantees to anything. After the donation the problem should have been between the lesbian couple, not the man and some lesbian…
/r/MensRights25/01/14 10:29 PM
1

Men don't take them seriously because everyone has decided women don't need to deal with the consequences of their actions.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 06:51 PM
1

A few years ago the government (at least in the US) decided that a woman can not sign over or away her children's rights. That means mommy isn't solely responsible for you if she does some crazy shit and can't afford you anymore. And then women wonder why men won't take them seriously.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 06:54 AM
2

Wasn't there a thread recently about how Asian men have certain privileges in Software Development over women? And to be honest, I see WAY more Asians in software than I see any other group (short of whites). But given that Asians represent under 5% of the US population, that's a huge difference. If 30-40% of people working in software (where I work) happen to be Asian, and less than 5% are black and the rest are white, what am I supposed to think? Where's the "racism and privilege" or whatever …
/r/MensRights25/01/14 05:45 AM
2

Clean break without worry. She can't falsely accuse you of anything if she doesn't know who you really are. She can't pull the "oops I'm pregnant" card a few months later. Or the "I had your kid" a few years later by tracking you down, especially when it's not your kid. No way to harass you, no way to call your work, no way to put a false restraining order on you just to mess with your life, nothing. You get in, do your thing and get out when you want on your terms without worrying about her goi…
/r/MensRights24/01/14 08:30 PM
8

It's been posted a few times. 1 2 3 It's just not popular since it's "female sex tournism" not "men fucking trafficked little girls".
/r/MensRights24/01/14 06:42 PM
6

And yet they bash on men visiting prostitutes.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 06:27 PM
2

I like how his size is brought into account as an example of why she can't do anything to him. This guy was 6'5" and 220 pounds and his wife killed him no problem.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 06:07 PM
4

Fuck them using a false name and a google number. Then just burn the bridge when you want to stop seeing her or things are getting too dangerous.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 05:25 PM
1

And anyone who thought her attractiveness was relevant in a discussion about prison rape jokes doesn't give even half a shit about men's rights and is here purely for the misogynist circlejerking. This is where you fucked up and proved your point. There's no misogyny here. Calling a girl ugly doesn't mean I hate her. Calling a girl ugly doesn't mean I hate all women. Quit using that word, it doesn't mean what you think it means and it certainly doesn't fit into this category. I could call Beyonc…
/r/MensRights24/01/14 07:30 AM
2

Dude it's implied. I'll make this my last comment because I'm getting tired of this. But this is the same shit as "does my ass look fat?". This chick made an offhand comment, she may have not intended it to go a certain way, but guess what, it did. Were the people who "took it off road" and said she was ugly wrong? No, of course not. They have their own opinions and are entitled to them. Not to mention I agree with them, so there's that. Everyone has a right to their opinion, but why would someo…
/r/MensRights24/01/14 06:13 AM
0

Dude it's an example. A lot of girls say shit they don't mean. It's not like people were going around shitting on her parade. It's like 2-3 steps removed from her, so you don't have to personally worry about her feelings being hurt. That being said, people still get to have their opinions. If it had happened on her Facebook wall, said people would be banned. Since it didn't, that's that. There's no moral obligation for anyone out there to be "nice" beyond a reasonable doubt, to go above and beyo…
/r/MensRights24/01/14 05:54 AM
1

And I highly doubt the hot chicks saying "look at how ugly/fat I look" are sincere. But that doesn't mean they should be spared from the truth.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 05:16 AM
1

But going through a doctor costs a fuckload. Why not have some median where both parties can meet up with a third party, sign a contract, do the deed, and move on. No MD required to do any work and charge a few grand for something two people can do naturally in under 5 minutes.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 03:02 AM
11

Calling political speech that does not toe the liberal line “hate speech” is a common tactic of Queer and Liberal organizations. Rather than free and open debate, such MRAs want you to embrace thought-terminating cliches OH LAWDY, this is not even ironic. Is there a word for hypocritical irony? Like Hyrony or something? Because we're way, way up there. Maybe we should just go with Hypony just to piss these people off a wee bit more.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 02:06 AM
-3

I still don't understand who believes 4 men would marry a woman. Maybe Heidi Klum, Jessica Alba or Scarlett Johansson if those guys were waiters or even some desperate middle management types. But no way would those same guys marry some poverty stricken single mom, especially since she'll be ugly as shit. Seriously, we live in a society where being young, having a vagina and being attractive means you get money in buckets. Strippers make bank, and you think Spitzers whore ever went hungry chargi…
/r/MensRights24/01/14 01:40 AM
3

It's not like someone called her ugly out of the blue, like "look at how ugly that girl is". It's actually very relevant to her question and the picture she posted. Like a 600 pound guy posting a selfie on how he isn't allowed on the roller coaster, and someone says "because you're fat". Well yeah, if you can't safely fit into and be fastened down into the ride, then it's pretty relevant.
/r/MensRights24/01/14 01:02 AM
17

Saying someone is not attractive is not fucking ammunition. Quit being so fucking terrified of feminists and whatever other groups out there who want to attack men's rights. Do you honestly think people will give a damn if some random feminist goes around posting screenshots of a men's rights post showing "she's not that attractive" as proof we're misogynists and people will take him/her seriously? No. Guess what, we get to have preferences and make our own decisions, in fact we can even voice t…
/r/MensRights24/01/14 12:24 AM
4

Look at the divorce rate in the early 70's.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 06:56 AM
12

Also known as the "you didn't jump through some weird hoops we just made up just so we wouldn't have to pay to support this kid".
/r/MensRights23/01/14 05:44 AM
-1

I have to wonder if after the clusterfuck that is Obamacare, this is his way of staying on good grounds with the female voters. Let's be honest now, nothing is straightforward when it comes to politics and certainly not US politics. This isn't about the safety of women on campuses across the US, there's another reason behind this. Otherwise, why not just deny campuses across the US the ability to handle their own rape accusations, involve the local police departments, and send those police depar…
/r/MensRights23/01/14 05:40 AM
2

Tell everyone you're gay.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 05:22 AM
12

Don't forget affirmative action and programs to get women into x. Health care is by law, a set cost for both men and women. Women can't be charged more for being women or being more expensive. But car insurance is for some reason different. You don't even have to go to courts to look at this. Just life in general, the starts kids get based on their gender. How many female only scholarships are out there compared to male only (in fact I've never seen a male only one)? And programs as well. Either…
/r/MensRights20/01/14 06:47 PM
3

Title is misleading. They don't marry and divorce for the benefits, they're saying that a woman should marry multiple men. This might seem like a good idea, except that I doubt most men want to share a woman, not to mention there's already more women than men out there. If every woman married 4 guys, there would be 3/4 or more women out there that would be left single.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 06:40 PM
6

He is being sarcastic. Feminists usually have "arguments" about how a male birth control is wrong because "men can't be trusted". Now not all feminists argue that point, but gender feminists, the most vocal feminists, and to some extent the most powerful feminists see it that way. To them, men shouldn't be able to chose. Overpopulation is already somewhat solved. Giving men effective contraception would only "solve" it more. World hunger will never be fixed. Partially because a majority of it is…
/r/MensRights17/01/14 05:58 AM
3

I do feel bad for the girls when some people don't take them seriously. None of my CS teachers in the classes we had girls in ever made assumptions, so it might not be very common, or I just missed it. But this is also a double edged sword. Since this guy is Asian, he'll have it even worse. Everyone will expect him to be an expert, to have every solution, every plan, etc. And when he doesn't, he'll be seen as incompetent. It's kind of like how black guys are all expected to have big dicks, and w…
/r/MensRights17/01/14 03:45 AM
8

It doesn't elude them, they're just running out of causes and they need to keep the perpetual victim-hood going.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 12:12 AM
1

Well I don't know about American feminists, but there's a lot of changes going on right now that's trying to prevent men from going to other countries for women. Example 1. Example 2. According to ROKS, current regulations make it too easy for men to start relationships with foreign women and bring them to Sweden for the sole purpose of taking advantage of them. And a fuckload more on sites I don't want to link to like Jezebel.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 02:28 AM
1

They can keep expecting, this country's fucked. As if things aren't bad enough, they're trying to put even more burdens on men, especially the young ones who are facing one of the worst economies in decades.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 01:41 AM
2

How high is his child support that he had the laws re-written?
/r/MensRights14/01/14 08:15 PM
2

So like exactly what my grade-school did between the 6th graders and 1st graders. I mean not "exactly" but you get the point. I can't wait for the "women no longer represent 60+ % of the college body" oppression, when every kid will have to support these achieve-less bums.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 06:01 AM
-3

As far as she knew, the guy just hit on her/grabbed her. She never even bothered to show any form of rejection, she went straight for the physical violence. If a girl ever grabbed my ass at a party or a bar, should I just go straight for the KO instead of maybe verbally announcing that she needs to stop and I'm not interested? After all, according to your logic, I'm defending myself and anyone who disagrees is a rapist/abuser.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 06:17 PM
9

I love how they act like a man would never dare defend himself or even raise his hand against a woman. I would just shove her and make a scene, call her a crazy bitch and move on. And that guy was a bit too grabby as well. Both of them were in the fucking wrong.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 03:59 AM
2

Apparently, a criminal harassment charge is rooted in the alleged victim’s perception of the offending conduct. If said conduct, whether that be actually physically following someone or repeatedly communicating with that person, causes the person “reasonably, in all the circumstances, to fear for their safety”, that’s enough, says the Criminal Code. Are these people fucking insane? By this logic, me walking at night is enough to put me behind bars, because some random chick thinks I'll rape her.…
/r/MensRights11/01/14 03:40 AM
3

So she hanged herself and they call it "compression of the neck" to make it sound like she was chocked, even though her death isn't suspicious. Wow.
/r/MensRights11/01/14 03:35 AM
3

1.9 is like 1.90 compared to 1.10. The problem is they were retarded and didn't include that 0 to show it was a single digit (as in 1.09). Their first patch, 1.1 and their 10th, 1.10 is technically the same thing since both could be interpreted as 1.1, and a computer won't see any difference between them, since all unnecessary 0's after a number are removed (unless those digits have a purpose). You would never write 1.100000000000000000000 when you could just have 1.1 and both numbers represent …
/r/MensRights11/01/14 03:28 AM
4

I don't see how the Y chromosome was ever in danger. Let's make an ass out of ourselves for a minute. Assuming evolution is everything nice, sugar and spice, then the X chromosome is the "old" stuff. It's the stuff that's responsible for making new humans after all. So given the existence of the Y chromosome, we can only assume that for a REALLY long time in the past, women were breeding themselves. Then at some point evolution decided that mixing genes and "sharing info" was better, so the Y ch…
/r/MensRights10/01/14 05:33 AM
2

I honestly think that the reverse is more true than this. Like the saying goes, men marry a woman expecting her never to change and she does. Women marry a man expecting him to change and he never does. Women "settle" and when the guy never becomes the man they dream of (not for a lack of trying on their part) they divorce and look for someone better. The only good thing about no fault divorce is that after a divorce (if the guy doesn't commit suicide) he won't have to deal with a woman constant…
/r/MensRights10/01/14 05:19 AM
2

Not a feminist means misogynist.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 10:15 PM
6

But it's not rape, because of the implication.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 02:20 AM
5

Reducing my beer from 12 fluid ounces to 11.2 fluid ounces. Next question.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 02:13 AM
4

WTF is that citation linking to? Some book about gay and lesbian law enforcement officers? What? Fucking woozle effect up in here.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 01:44 AM
9

I'll just leave this here.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 10:23 PM
3

There was no door, it was like a U shaped hallway.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 05:55 AM
3

The ones in a mall I used to go to had them. They were like regular men's bathrooms. Maybe you're thinking college?
/r/MensRights08/01/14 05:38 AM
1

Which is exactly why I would cut in line. Unless the girls plan on pissing in the urinals, there's no point in me standing around while they're empty.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 05:30 AM
4

All hail the womyn. I can't wait when 10-20 years down the line they start talking about the "debt gap" while completely ignoring the reasons (like student loan debt) and attributing it to things like "women have to spend a fortune going into debt to care for their kids" or some other nonsense.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 11:24 PM
4

The reasons given for women destroying male spaces may be conspiracy, but the the actual destruction (and denying) of male spaces is something that's been occurring for quite a while.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 01:10 AM
1

Not really men's rights, but a great way to end up single and alone.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 01:43 AM
10

First thing I thought of when I saw his injuries was of this. And that guy got 15 years. They didn't even give her a year, and even that was suspended. She basically got 3 weeks worth of community service.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 11:51 PM
4

I like how they blame rich white men. We need to start acting more like those rich Indian, Muslim, Black and Asian men, and treat our women accordingly. And all this talk about powerful men screwing over women. I'd like to see what the genders are on government handouts and how much each gender receives. And on top of that women get to retire earlier, while living longer and collecting more pension. But again, all we're focusing on is what? The top 0.0001%? There's only so many CEO's and leaders…
/r/MensRights31/12/13 09:38 PM
2

It all depends. I highly doubt women would be fine with a guy who has a lot of partners, unless he has a lot of power, wealth and high social status. But you don't need to have a lot of partners (most guys don't have that many) to find someone who hasn't had a lot of partners and thinks sex is important. If you're a guy who has been ignored since high school and has constantly improved himself, you have the option in your 30's to pick up a girl in her 20's. If she's serious, open minded and comm…
/r/MensRights27/12/13 12:29 AM
2

Discussion of ideas and concepts that I haven't come across before. Judgybitch and Dalrock usually do a good job of that to give some examples.
/r/MensRights27/12/13 12:03 AM
2

Already happened and there was an exact thing related to this. Okcupid added an option to filter people out on body type. Women lost their shit. Thing is, you can filter people on income and height since day 1 and it's a free option, unlike the body type which requires membership. What I wonder is how women would react to a guy wearing elevator shoes. I'm a pretty tall guy so I've never had the problem, but I can only imagine them complaining if the 6' tall guy they started dating was actually 5…
/r/MensRights26/12/13 11:21 PM
3

So I know that "cock carousel" is a primarily red pill term. What's the argument against marrying or being in a relationship with a woman who's "ridden" one? And is there an equivalent for men? Everyone has a different opinion on it, so I can't speak for everyone. But here's how I see it. First, a guy may not want a woman who has had many sexual partners, so that may put him off if he's a virgin and she's had 20+. Secondly, those same girls who were riding the "cock carousel" in their youth, say…
/r/MensRights26/12/13 09:15 PM
12

Obviously the "patriarchy" is feeling the pressure and wants us all to go back to the "good old days". Keep fighting the good fight feminists! This is proof that we're winning! /s
/r/MensRights24/12/13 06:37 AM
30

A movie about paternity fraud would be something. But I highly doubt it will ever be a comedy where the "father" and the (let's say) clueless sperm donor find out the truth, get together and plot against the wife. All while the audience cheers and awaits her well deserved fate.
/r/MensRights22/12/13 04:19 AM
1

This isn't MGTOW. He's advocating hypoagency.
/r/MGTOW21/12/13 08:08 PM
6

It's true for Ivy League. I think if I remember correctly they represent 25% of the student body and need perfect SAT scores to qualify. While whirs need lower, blacks even lower and native Americans are a shoe in.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 06:20 AM
14

I always find it funny how affirmative action is there to help minorities, with the exclusion of asians.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 04:54 AM
1

Exactly. A lot of people don't realize that this is a two way street, a double edged sword. Gold diggers might benefit from manipulating a man into giving them a life of luxury and comfort by using their looks, but there's no reason and nothing stopping men from doing the same. And that's the game that many people don't realize exists. You can use your wealth to get hot women, gold diggers to be more specific. Use them until you get tired of them, say early thirtees, and then get rid of them. Is…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 03:54 AM
50

Isn't that kind of like the wage gap? White women earn a fucking hell of a lot more than black and latino women.
/r/MensRights21/12/13 03:13 AM
2

I kind of need to see a movie now where a gold digging b***ch gets dumped and has her life ruined. That would actually make for a fun and educational movie. Most guys see gold diggers as a woman who likes you for your wealth and will dump you if you go poor or she finds someone better. But gold diggers can be fun if you know how to play the game. Use them for their youth and looks, and once those go, move on to gold digger number two, 15 years younger and hotter than the last one ever was.
/r/MensRights20/12/13 02:23 AM
2

Wait. This was actually made by feminists? I thought it was a response to the feminists who wanted a feminist programming language.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 05:29 PM
-1

Black people aren't/weren't the only slaves in the fucking world you know. Here's the wiki on debt bondage. And this isn't something that happened in the past, it's happening right now. What exactly do you see as slavery?
/r/MensRights19/12/13 05:16 PM
1

The boys might be called a root rat. Swordsman. Hard dog to keep on the porch. But there is no word for male promiscuity, at any age, without at least a hint - and usually a truckload - of admiration. And whose fault is that? Girls and women shame their peers for putting out, men cheer and congratulate theirs for getting laid. It's as if men need to be shamed because women are shamed, not prevent women from shaming each other. Because shaming is good, except when it's not. There's a level at whi…
/r/MensRights18/12/13 11:55 PM
3

Prenups don't work. If you’re considering leaving your job to become a stay-at-home mom, please do yourself — and your marriage — a favor: Get a postnup. You and your husband should sign a postnuptial agreement, one that clearly specifies how you would be compensated for forfeiting your highest-earning years should the marriage end in divorce. 30-35 are not "your highest-earning years". Kindergarten is free and starts at 5. Just because you had a kid doesn't mean you get to take 20 years or the …
/r/MensRights18/12/13 10:08 PM
4

I like how this is brought up as an issue since some guy went to jail for poking holes in his condom and I guess some women don't want to be forced into what other women have forced men into, aka parenthood. But what about paternity fraud? I would say that's potentially worse since a guy gets all of the responsibility but virtually nothing in return short of being screwed out of having his own offspring. At least it's a start.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 06:22 PM
5

I highly doubt they can check who sold the printer or who owns it. Now if they busted down their door and confiscated said printer, then they might be able to look up the signature in a database to see if they ever printed some threatening letters, money, or committed other felonies using said printer. And I highly doubt the cops are going to give two shits on $2000 worth of calendars.
/r/MensRights18/12/13 05:47 PM
4

Yeah, gawker media websites where doxxing = journalism. No linking to SRS or affiliated subs, or Gawker Media websites. Oh wait. What exactly would you see as a doxxing site? Do these things even exist?
/r/MensRights17/12/13 11:36 PM
2

If those aren't signs of a broken society, I don't know what is.
/r/MensRights17/12/13 09:59 PM
6

This isn't really a good representation of reality. Know who gets the most "government handouts"? People with children. Huge tax deduction. Free education. Know who else gets a large chunk? People who own a house. Everyone with children gets that, because we all got that growing up, so it's only paying it back. But there's a difference between paying it back and living off the government. Also, how did we get on the subject of single mothers, specifically? The article was about single women. Nei…
/r/MensRights17/12/13 02:53 AM
6

This sweeping appeal to history somehow overlooks history’s far darker lessons about the cyclic rise and fall of civilizations, which as they become more complex and interconnected also become more vulnerable to collapse. The earth is littered with the ruins of empires that believed they were eternal. This is one thing people seem to forget. Every empire falls, every empire that has ever existed has fallen. The ones that exist today may not be around in 100 years and certainly not in 1000. Peopl…
/r/MensRights17/12/13 01:24 AM
5

They campaigned for no fault divorce which destroyed marriages. The nuclear family is better than what we have now. People in the nuclear family supported themselves rather than rely on government handouts. There's a reason so many single mothers live in poverty. What made the nuclear family less necessary is the government handouts. The responsible, successful people are supporting the irresponsible ones through taxes. I'm not against safety nets, but I am against people making a lifestyle out …
/r/MensRights17/12/13 01:03 AM
1

Here's an Australian one that's exactly like Lulu. Here's a translated version of an article from Brazil that bans a website like Lulu for men (note than lulu is perfectly legal and still exists in Brazil).
/r/MensRights16/12/13 02:57 AM
2

The difference is that none of those sites link the actual person to the rating. If I vote on some hottie on hot or not, I have no clue who she is. On Lulu, it's linked to your facebook, to your real name and all the information about you. From there I can find your name, your address, phone number, your past, your friends, everything. Instead of just rating you and moving on and forgetting about you, it gives people an extra bit of info and that extra bit is the difference between them jacking …
/r/MensRights16/12/13 02:32 AM
3

You can become a minimalist. Work part time and be frugal. Unfortunately most careers don't let you work part time, but if you become a consultant or run your own business, then you could do it. Personally I'd rather have a 20 hour (10 hours 2 days a week) job that paid $50k rather than a 40 hour $100k+ job. Those figures aren't exactly high in my field so it would be possible, if employers offered the 20 hours/2 days a week job. That being said, I suppose you could always go and join the Amish.
/r/MensRights16/12/13 12:29 AM
1

Don't forget the fedora.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 11:24 PM
1

No, but I think names are more of a subconscious thing.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 10:50 PM
1

Probably because of this. Jim or Brian is a "blue collar" name, Reginald is something a wealthier family might name their kid.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 10:18 PM
0

This is a meaningless statement. You are no closer to making me believe in inferior female engineers. I've shown evidence that are not inferior. It's from the department of education. Thanks for this! I read up to the conclusion, but did you miss this?: I didn't miss it, it's just that my personal experience says different. I may very well be wrong, but I have argued about this topic some time ago (several times) in the men's rights subreddit and the truth is that a lot of US colleges (at least …
/r/PussyPass15/12/13 03:13 AM
17

I know right? What a retarded question, we all know what they will wear. What every girl everywhere wears. And the $600 "I just got out of bed" look is getting old. That being said, I think they're just pissed that the bottom 80% of guys dare to stare at them.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 02:08 AM
1

Don't teach kids to avoid strangers and tell their parents if a stranger touched them, teach child molesters not to rape kids. I always wondered why feminists with that point of view didn't remove all the funding from the police for rape investigations and from the courts for rape prosecutions and put it towards teaching kids and adults that rape is wrong. Surely all of that funding could reach everyone. And rape would be history.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 01:57 AM
3

I just watched the original and this bitch is batshit crazy. This is that whole elevator/coffee rape all over again, except the guy didn't make sexual advances on her, just asked her out for coffee. Now she acts offended that some guy wouldn't fuck her on her terms. And now she's publicly shaming the poor guy for not putting out when she approved of him. I'm surprised the video even focuses on her ordering alcohol when there's so much more crazy in the original.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 11:25 PM
7

Most prostitutes well escorts don't sell just sex. They sell their time. A lot of guys pay them to just hang out and chat, just read the numerous AMA's out there from prostitutes. If you look up most escorts, they have a girlfriend experience service. This doesn't just come with straight sex, it comes with cuddling and pretending you two are together and pretty much what you would do with a girlfriend. Why else would they have to have a service called "girlfriend experience" if people just wante…
/r/MensRights14/12/13 09:20 PM
7

Under the Cyber Safety Act, cyberbullying is defined as the repeated use of technology to cause “fear, intimidation, humiliation, distress or other damage or harm to another person’s health, emotional well-being, self-esteem or reputation.” Hmm, how did he cause that by posting a picture of something she consented to doing? In the meantime, she said, she tracked down the boy’s father and school principal to compel them to have the photos taken down. Neat. I wonder if he could press charges and h…
/r/MensRights14/12/13 03:59 PM
2

This is taken way out of context. And I haven't even seen the video.
/r/MensRights14/12/13 03:10 AM
3

How do we know it wasn't scat evidence? Drunk girl + anal = drunk shits everywhere.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 09:22 PM
1

There is no evidence for this claim. High school isn't a long time, and we started college right afterwards if we are lucky. I am pretty sure I couldn't hold down my job without remembering and understanding the fundamentals I learned way back when. Have you checked? There's a few other issues than this, but girls start with better math grades early on and up to the end of high school, then they start falling behind. Here's a study. While girls overwhelmingly outperformed boys on the English/lan…
/r/PussyPass13/12/13 02:34 AM
3

I see nothing there that would prevent a woman from obtaining an engineering degree. What else, we got? Nothing short of personal choice. “Women are better at intuitive thinking. Women are better at remembering things. When you talk, women are more emotionally involved – they will listen more.” Oh, so she'll collaborate with engineering buddies, okay cool. Anything else? This is where things change. Remembering things vs understanding things. Memory based testing might get you through high schoo…
/r/PussyPass13/12/13 12:47 AM
9

Here's some science for ya.
/r/PussyPass13/12/13 12:28 AM
2

So the gist of her argument is that women have higher standards and therefore the reason they reject men is because they're not getting the "right guy" and by right guy I'm thinking billionaire, fit and good looking 28 year old Christian Grey. Oh and don't forget tall, no guys under 6' or 6'2" or whatever their fucking preference is. But she doesn't even make a point, she spends the entire article dancing around the issue. Can women get sex whenever they want? Yes. Is it going to be the best sex…
/r/MensRights11/12/13 09:46 PM
1

That price just screams ripoff.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 09:20 PM
0

Given the current trend, his teacher was probably jealous.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 01:54 AM
6

How come no one (mainly feminists) speak up about this if they are for equality for all? Why is only exploitation if it's about women? Because a lot of these feminists want us to give Chivalry a second chance. Why do you think women have had to option to abandon their gender roles for the last 50 or so years, but men are still told to "man up"? It's all about having the cake and eating it too.
/r/MensRights11/12/13 01:07 AM
1

I would just leave the country. Screw prison, I have options. But otherwise, yeah probably. I'm tired of the state pushing men to take responsibility for these women and punishing men because otherwise the state would have to intervene. How about holding these women responsible? We used to do that back in the day, and there were a hell of a lot fewer single moms back then.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 07:30 PM
2

It's not just Canada.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 07:22 PM
2

Yeah from 99.9th percentile to 90th percentile of men and that's just height. She still wants the extremely successful guy who has no problem pulling 20 year olds.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 07:10 PM
3

$5 says this is a beachhead for other things. I'm sure the radfem wants to ban sites like MGTOW and MRM, and the other two have similar goals with other subjects.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 06:42 PM
2

Have fun with that. This chick won't be able to donate eggs, let alone have healthy kids in 3 years (assuming she'll still be able to have kids) and look at the requirements she's got. 34 years old, hasn't found anyone and she's still going strong.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 04:46 PM
8

You kind of have your things mixed up. MGTOW isn't about avoiding relationships, it's about weighing the risks and benefits and then determining what you're comfortable with. Just because you're MGTOW doesn't mean you don't have sex or avoid women altogether. What it does mean is that you only participate to the degree you feel comfortable with. For example let me explain it in another way. Say everywhere you go, every commercial on TV and all of society focuses on Las Vegas and how much money p…
/r/MGTOW09/12/13 05:00 AM
5

/r/feminism had tons of threads about a pill 1-2 years ago. Main argument was that "men can't be trusted to take the pill". So if you want to research it, start with that argument.
/r/MensRights09/12/13 04:23 AM
2

I'd like to see a more detailed comparison instead of yearly take home pay.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 10:34 PM
1

In three months this chick gets more money than the per capita income in that country. She's getting the equivalent of $230,000 in the US and is driving a nicer car than most people I know. And who knows if she has to pay any of the bills. Seriously, bitch is set. I don't even care what people say about "oppression", life is shit for most people, and she's living better than most, and that's including the western world. Her allowance is equivalent to the 1% in the US after taxes. And from what I…
/r/MensRights08/12/13 05:25 AM
2

I honestly wish she could abort that boy. Better than him being raised by a mother who already hates him before he's even half way to being born.
/r/MensRights08/12/13 04:20 AM
2

Try to take that advice as a guy and you're going on a list after being arrested for domestic violence.
/r/MGTOW08/12/13 03:52 AM
2

Would have been nicer if they used two artists, and didn't tell them which woman was the "ugly" drawing and which woman was the "nice" drawing (what I mean by this is that there's some bias for the commercial and the people funding this to make the woman who describes herself as the "ugly" drawing). Then compare.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 07:41 AM
2

You're 15 and you can "help" me? Sure why not? Oh I'm going to be arrested for accepting that help? Good luck trying to prove anything in a court of law. I would have made her wash all the dishes in my kitchen sink, and then the sink itself (that's not an easy task). But really, what genius thinks this is a good idea as a prank? Some people out there are not only armed but ready to throw down (aka knives/guns) before going or going back to jail, especially under these circumstances.
/r/MensRights07/12/13 07:37 AM
16

If they really want to go there, can we just kick them out? Or at least call them out on it? How much shit have women contributed to the society we live in? Yeah, don't even start with the birth crap. How many of the inventions we use every day were created by women? How much of our infrastructure was made and is being maintained by women? How many women built the roads we drive on every day? The buildings we live and work in every day? The food we buy at our grocery stores? The truth is that if…
/r/MensRights07/12/13 06:09 AM
3

There was an AMA a while back where a cop was talking about this, I think he may have even worked on TCAP. Anyway, he said that most women were a lot smarter than men the way they approach/groom their victims and are much harder to catch.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 09:52 PM
5

Give it 16 days and the reactions to this should be interesting. I have a feeling there will be 100x more articles about this than lulu.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 07:09 PM
5

Or I could have nothing to do with it. Her being irresponsible doesn't mean that I should swoop in and save her. And given the fact that I've never raped some chick but have spent quite a bit of time in the past worrying about their safety, I would have to say it's their problem now. I won't rape you, but heads up because someone else might. Good luck and this is the part where I would shake their hand and say good night. You're trying to corner me and make me feel guilty, but that's hard to do …
/r/MensRights06/12/13 05:31 AM
3

Well it depends. If you go to photos and you click on photos #3 you will notice that at least 3 guys are checking them out. But I'm sure they're not the "right" type of guys. You know, young, successful, fashionable, driving Bentleys, 5-7 times separated from current royal families. "Men" as they refer to them.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 04:43 AM
8

Not either. It's just that they focus on the "statistics" of it by claiming plenty of women get raped, but not focusing on all of the issues that make those statistics. For example both regret and a man "begging for sex" are considered rape in these statistics, so it would only be fair to give them some "stage" time. Additionally all of these anti rape videos focus on "stranger danger" and never on actual likelihood of being raped. If they did, it would go something like, your parents or immedia…
/r/MensRights06/12/13 04:30 AM
3

I like the bitching about "good men" and a good dose of hypocrisy. Case in point (or is it Case and point, I forget) here. FTA: “I think the Latin culture in Florida really helps; people are warm, men smile at you on the street. They look at you. Men here, they don’t even turn their head to look at you.”
/r/MensRights06/12/13 03:10 AM
1

Why? Not only easier, but it's far more effective if you just ignore them.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 02:51 AM
7

Why do they keep focusing on this and not including the whole argument/picture? Even feminists will agree that stranger rape is rare compared to the rest. Even though the subliminal message here is stranger rape. But that's beside the point, why not focus on the whole argument? The methods used to collect this data? 1 in 3? Just because she initiated it and regretted it later doesn't mean you didn't rape her. Just because you initiated and she went along with it doesn't mean you didn't rape her.…
/r/MensRights06/12/13 02:05 AM
10

For the same reason western women don't like "mail order brides" or men traveling overseas to find a woman. Hypergamy dictates that women can't go up from western men. There simply is no more attractive, more successful, more intelligent male out there (we're talking averages here people). So they're stuck with us, but men on the other hand aren't stuck with western women. There's plenty of attractive young women all over the world, and I don't think western women like competing with them. Compe…
/r/MensRights06/12/13 01:06 AM
3

My buddy actually was arrested and kicked out (had to spend a few nights at my place) a few years back because his neighbors called the cops on him and his wife. They were arguing, but they weren't hitting each other or anything, just a lot of yelling back and forth. Since their neighbors not only lived next door (houses were connected) but the walls were also thin, they could hear everything and it seemed much worse than they thought. Even though his wife was pissed, she didn't want him gone si…
/r/MensRights06/12/13 12:10 AM
2

I'm really curious to see what happens considering Debra Lafave pulled the same shit with a 14 year old in the same county and she got nothing, in fact I think her parole was reduced after a year or two.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 05:20 PM
11

Barbie is also unrealistically thin because girls used to dress her up and clothes wouldn't look right on a "normal" doll.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 05:07 PM
-1

70% of the population is white, 12% is black, 18% is other. "Natural" circumstances, assuming everyone is equal would mean that no matter where you go, in a true meritocracy where everyone participates or tries to participate in an "equal" manner (meaning that say 5% of the top of the population in each racial group and each gender apply to Ivy league schools), you would end up with a 70% white, 12% black and 18% other balance. Anything else might be biased depending on how things work. For exam…
/r/MensRights04/12/13 05:59 AM
3

Here's a list of school shootings in the US. It started with Native Americans in the 18th century, but I'm sure people will act like it's a new phenomenon. Also is this about Sandy Hook? Because it's not really a new thing for people to shoot up elementary schools. And how exactly are we going to "do everything we can" to help our sons, when not only are they being shit on in school, but actual real life bullying is ignored while online "cyber bullying" that seems to affect girls (or at least th…
/r/MensRights04/12/13 05:03 AM
3

The only case I can think of is that judge who sent kids to juvi/jail for cash. He got 28 years, but it's technically not very similar since people will react differently when it comes to kids. Then again, 40,000 samples could potentially mean 40,000 people, so this is some pretty huge shit, not just fucking people over wise, but the cost it will take to re-open every case and do it all over again just to make sure.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 04:49 AM
2

I was going to say there's a difference between men wanting kids and wanting to have kids (and no this doesn't mean I want to date single moms or adopt), but he pretty much made that whole argument throughout the video. I wonder if we're going to end up somewhat like Calhoun's mouse experiment. Source for the curious.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 03:46 AM
29

Asians have it harder when it comes to getting into Ivy League schools and receive little to none elsewhere. Funny how that works out.
/r/MensRights04/12/13 02:16 AM
2

I never understood the hate for gold diggers, maybe because people never played by the rules? Yes a gold digger is only interested in money and will only date you if you're rich and the second you stop spending money on her or lose your wealth, she leaves you. So far so good. But a successful gold digger is also attractive, and since you're both playing the gold digging game, once she stop putting out or she's no longer attractive (or as attractive) then you get rid of her, no big deal. I'm sure…
/r/MensRights03/12/13 05:06 PM
29

It's amazing the reaction people will have to a woman simply telling her son to protect himself. If you said the same to women, it's victim blaming, but reverse the genders and all of a sudden you're claiming all women are false rape accusers. I can't even process the hypocrisy in this bullshit.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 04:58 PM
4

Should've left her alone when she sat down.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 03:39 PM
2

So feminism is empowering and yet all we hear about is how men hurt women by doing nothing? Really? And I wonder why fewer and fewer people are taking them seriously. And have any of these people ever actually thought that maybe life is hard? That everyone has to face certain hardships in one way or another and it's not just women? Maybe that which you attribute to sexism is just life being a bitch. Like becoming a day care worker instead of starting your own business, or working part time inste…
/r/MensRights01/12/13 07:53 PM
5

I wonder what percentage of those women work in HR for tech companies, or some other role for a tech company. Every time some "gap" has been brought up, it was nothing but lies and manipulation of the raw data to suit them, so forgive me if I'm fucking skeptical of anything. As for 80 cents to the dollar. That's less than 7 hours of overtime extra. Don't forget that "full time" is 35 hours and up. My buddy works in tech like me, he just started, and he's pushing 60 hours a week. Wonder how many …
/r/MensRights30/11/13 10:32 PM
3

I'm not new here, I've read plenty of articles where feminists came out claiming they were feminists and wanted equality but still missed chivalry and how it's such a "noble" thing that we shouldn't discard. Perhaps I should start adding a /s to the end of my posts.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 10:27 PM
2

I was being sarcastic. Like how women are all for "the person who asks you out should pay" when it comes to dating, as if there's some 50/50 split between men and women approaching the opposite sex. Benevolent sexism is nothing short of "I know it's sexist, but I like it, so it's not 'bad' sexism it's 'good' sexism".
/r/MensRights30/11/13 10:25 PM
6

Fuck it, I'm all for her being able to steal the kids (while being charged with kidnapping charges), but once she does that, don't ever expect child support.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 10:05 PM
5

That's just benevolent sexism. If a guy wants to pay for an entire date, be a "gentleman" and "chivalrous" by holding her door open and pulling out her seat, etc, well that's just his choice.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 09:47 PM
13

No, because just like a false rape claim, the girl can say that he used her phone to send that text, or that after sending said text, she withdrew consent during sex and he wouldn't stop, etc. The fact is, that unless you record the whole event (which will get you in all sorts of other trouble if you do it secretly), you don't stand a chance.
/r/MensRights29/11/13 05:55 PM
10

I'd rather have one where women can judge other women anonymously. That would be real fun.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 04:45 PM
13

Only advice I can give you is to make damn sure that kid is actually yours. Your best bet is to talk to a lawyer since laws differ from province/state and country. US here, so I have no clue what Ontario is like on this.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 01:22 AM
6

That's neat. Same type of people who will let a woman go free after murdering her husband because he "abused" her. All this list would do is give women power to continue to abuse their ex even after the relationship is over and he's tried to move to another state to get away. And don't even think that a woman would ever end up on this list. We've got teachers/care workers/cheerleaders fucking underage kids, not going to jail and half the time not even having to register as sex offenders. If they…
/r/MensRights26/11/13 04:23 PM
4

What's the point of blurring the names when I can just check your comment history and get right to that conversation?
/r/MensRights25/11/13 11:46 PM
2

Seems like men are having their "sexual revolution" and this traditionalist wants us to go back to how things were. Men don't need women and vice versa. Families need both, but that's not going to happen if things keep going this way. We could use fewer people on this earth anyway so it's win win.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 02:53 AM
14

Well they're using his real name and picture and he's under age, so couldn't they just call the police on them? Since they're also telling us where he lives, just e-mail the ones hosting that domain and complain. [email protected]
/r/MensRights24/11/13 12:09 AM
7

It all comes from 4chan, so it's hit or miss really. In fact most of these were supposed to be for the lulz, but ended up having an unintended impact on most folks.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 02:00 AM
10

I'm guessing it's this?
/r/MensRights22/11/13 09:13 PM
0

It doesn't work because as you can see in this graph it's not circumcision vs intact that's the problem, it's education. You can circumcise the entire population and you still wouldn't be making a difference.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 03:08 PM
19

16 is legal but has to be 18 if the person is in authority aka a teacher. In case people come in here bitching. I could maybe understand no jail sentence and whatnot, but how is she not fired and barred from ever teaching again? She said: 'I was in an incredibly emotional state and sexual intercourse was the last thing on my mind. So you can't function in society? Because I know I had quite some emotional states when I was in my teens and didn't jack off for 2-3 weeks. I wanted to kick peoples f…
/r/MensRights21/11/13 08:59 PM
12

Men never fully recover after a recession.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 05:54 PM
3

CEO's and executives have a lot of influence. They might not do any actual labor, but their research and decisions do affect the company heavily. Just look at how Microsoft sabotaged Nokia with Stephen Elop.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 05:38 PM
3

Notice that all of those jobs are very few and very good. They're office jobs with high pay but even then, how many of these jobs are out there? According to this article there were 156 executives in the top 100 companies that were hired last year. So how many jobs are we talking about here? A few hundred? A few thousand at most? And all of them will be going to the upper class women. For example Boeing employs 170,000 people, but has only 40 executives. It's also ranked 30 in the fortune 500. S…
/r/MensRights21/11/13 04:29 PM
2

Is it just me or do most of these "A man" represent guys and "a boy" represent women? I'm getting that vibe. Like a man pays for dinner, a "boy" will always keep track of who ordered what (just go out with a few girls and you'll see this happening every time). Or a man has an idea of where to eat, a boy will say "you pick". I don't think I've ever dated a girl that picked a place for us to eat.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 03:15 PM
23

Fine, but don't bitch when people say you're only there to fill a quota.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 09:00 PM
12

It is, but only when they talk about DV and lesbians. Since this is about Australia, I'll link to an Australian site about DV. Read some of those examples and pretend we're talking about a heterosexual relationship in which you are the man.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 05:50 PM
1

Why not just buy one? And if he's cheap, just get a knockoff.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 04:02 PM
19

So they're not emasculated but need to get permission from women to do what they want?
/r/MensRights20/11/13 03:49 PM
1

So masturbate to porn and stop approaching women. If enough men did this, the problem would fix itself overnight.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 12:49 AM
1

At least we don't walk around with our underwear around our ankles in public. The only reason men are "bad" is because the majority of the people in charge are men. Let's not forget that when a woman was in charge 250 or so years ago, she had her head chopped off for telling people to eat cake. And all the people she mentioned? They have power, wealth and resources that most of us can't even imagine. And who's the majority when it comes to voters? Women. Here's a paper that shows that when it co…
/r/MensRights17/11/13 04:24 AM
3

Meh, jokes are jokes. I don't think it's a gender rights issue and people should just fuck off when it comes to jokes. Sexist jokes can be fun but it is a double edged sword. You want sexist jokes? Here, let me make one up just for fun. Four women meet four rich men, each man richer than the other. The first woman talks to the first man and he tells her he's so rich that she'll never have to clean because he'll just hire a maid, but she has to do everything else. The second man tells the second …
/r/MensRights17/11/13 03:11 AM
3

Power, what power? Just ignore it like all those other things, you know like "man up" or "be a man" or "a real man...". Who gives a fuck. The more you concern yourself with these things the more power they have over you.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 02:02 AM
3

Yeah but you still miss a lot of weekends. You can't go into STEM thinking you'll get to have fun every weekend.
/r/MensRights16/11/13 01:41 PM
15

Poverty vs homeless is a whole different thing. And don't even start with tumblr. Tumblr is like every white girl, rich black girl or basically rich girl in general bitching and focusing on issues that the vast majority of people can't even focus on. 1 in 7 women lives in poverty and you show me a picture of a homeless woman who can go to a homeless or any other women only shelter and I'm supposed to feel bad? What about the 1 in 7 who's a single mom because fucking around is cool? Or whatever e…
/r/MensRights16/11/13 04:26 AM
4

It's true. And in all things being equal, bullets don't discriminate. Man, woman. No difference. Hot chick, ugly chick, fat chick, skinny chick, for example, same shit. We're all bags of skin full of water. And remember boys and girls, when your girlfriend or daughter says she was raped, put the gun down and call the police. Don't throw your life away on some woman's false accusation or interpretation of actual events. Let the law deal with it. The only thing you need to do is contact them and m…
/r/MensRights16/11/13 12:40 AM
14

Innocent and jailed until proven innocent. Fucked up system if you ask me and the best part is that it will fuck his life over just like he stated. And yet feminists will back her up because "it provides him with a learning experience" or whatever the fuck logic they're using this day. Even though that particular (and any) police station is a zero sum game where when you take resources from real rape cases and dedicate them to false ones, real rapists will get away. If 99% of reported rapes were…
/r/MensRights16/11/13 12:18 AM
2

Well obviously he's looking forward to abusing his children again, didn't you hear what that mother had to say? /s But really, awful stuff and glad to see some people doing something about it. All of this is fucked up on another level I could not and hope to never comprehend. I can't imagine having your kids just kidnapped (to some extent legally) and to finally get justice simply because (hopefully some men have been pushing for equality).
/r/MensRights16/11/13 12:07 AM
2

It depends who you are, what you look like and who you know. There have been plenty of women in the past who got off with a slap on the wrist for "molesting" underage girls. What I find strange is the 12 to life sentence. New York has an age of consent of 17 so 15 isn't that horrible. Yes I have read the part about her being with girls under 13, but she's not being charged for that. Something is off. Either she did some weird, really fucked up shit that they're not telling us or that 15 year old…
/r/MensRights15/11/13 10:51 PM
17

I'm starting to get the vibe that we've been down this road before. When men were the majority in education, it was sexism. Now that women are the majority, it's because of how "amazing" they are. What will hypothetically happen if women earn more than men even if they have kids and work part time? Will it be because of how amazing these women are and not because of sexist laws put in place to give these women an advantage? Or because we've changed the entire system to benefit women over men? Or…
/r/MensRights15/11/13 10:31 PM
10

Yeah, that will be the day. Maybe next you can convince women's studies majors to "lead by example" and major in STEM instead. No more 4 page essays, no more partying it up on the weekends, just a lot of work, a lot of lost sleep and school is just the beginning.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 10:10 PM
4

I didn't realize we got our data from FOX news of all places. Man I should unsubscribe without checking. I still don't understand why these people feel like I should feel insulted for being compared to David Futrelle (who seems to be a huge supporter of theirs). Either way, their argument has no merit whatsoever, it's clearly an SRS circlejerk with their alt accounts. If these stupid arguments could actually hurt us, we wouldn't be here.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 09:37 PM
3

I don't get how they put MGTOW in there but now PUA. PUA is technically a men's movement, even though it is just focused on sex and getting what you want from women. It's like what gold digging is for men.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 06:12 PM
1

Facts matter to people who read said articles and opinions. Nobody's trying to win over any feminists here.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 08:48 PM
8

So is this an MRA program under the rule of feminists or am I the only one getting that vibe?
/r/MensRights14/11/13 08:02 PM
14

Coerced or tricked? I've never seen that speech before when some under 18 chick carries a fake ID into a bar, meets a guy over 21 and has sex with him.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 07:54 PM
-1

They can say whatever they want, but others would see the facts and it will be only a matter of time until that argument loses its merit.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 07:41 PM
2

np dude, np.link. Links to other subreddits must use NP format ("np" in place of "www"). Cross linking to submissions from other subreddits with fewer than 30,000 members within the first 24 hours is prohibited.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 07:17 PM
0

And you did everyone a favor how exactly? Should have left that shit up. In 2-3 years down the road, facebook would have been full of feminist "I hate men" crap while not a single anti woman or anti feminist post/group/etc would exist. It would have been great to be able to point back at facebook every time feminists talk about the "online trolls" and show them their own hypocrisy while (inexplicably), facebook would be devoid of anything anti-them.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 06:40 PM
11

Buy one and wear it in October next year. Make it about men in women's month.
/r/MensRights14/11/13 05:03 PM
0

Great video, but I still don't buy that 85% of spending are women. The source for that was always bullshit and it seems like one of those lies that just won't die. If you think I'm wrong, please go ahead and cite a source that isn't "she-conomy" and doesn't reference that god awful site.
/r/MensRights13/11/13 08:01 PM
-6

I would totally rape a chick if I could get away with it. Provided she was consenting and had a rape fantasy. Tomorrow at 11 "man on /r/mensrights says he'd rape a helpless woman if he could get away with it".
/r/MensRights12/11/13 02:37 AM
32

Walked home from campus, saw a guy 200 meters away walking across campus, almost raped.
/r/MensRights12/11/13 02:36 AM
3

I think they want to do this because of the risk of "deadbeat dads". If you have a guarantee, you won't have to worry about the bad choices you make as a woman. And all of this funding will have to come from somewhere, so guess what, more taxes. I have no problem with social safety nets and whatever else, but there are people out there who are turning those safety nets into a fucking lifestyle. It would be nice if they had a time limit or maybe you get 4 years, then nothing for at least 2 years …
/r/MensRights11/11/13 02:37 AM
10

This has nothing to do with men's rights and everything to do with feminist censorship of things they don't approve of. 16 or so is legal in more parts of the world than not. Don't push your higher than thou bullshit on me. And stay on the subject.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 03:27 AM
4

Because the girls were past puberty, not naked and weren't in any sexually suggestive positions? Any other way you want to shame me into your view of the world?
/r/MensRights06/11/13 03:05 AM
5

I always love that argument. No mention how it was cp free and how that happened years into that subreddits life while also after the srs reddit bomb. Those people should have been reported to the FBI and left at that. Also it was people asking for nudes of "some guys" underage girlfriend and all of them were fairly new accounts. And that wasn't what brought /r/jailbait down.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 02:54 AM
5

I’m going to present you a scenario: imagine your girlfriend doesn’t want to go to the theatre with you. I'm going to present you with a scenario. Imagine you're a guy who can travel through time. You don't need a girlfriend. You have all the power, wealth and luxury the world has to offer. You have a harem of the most attractive and intelligent women of all the races in the world. The most incredible "date" a woman has ever been on is your dinner time when you felt like going to <insert best se…
/r/MensRights06/11/13 01:22 AM
10

Well off the top of my head, SRS "fempire" banning /r/jailbait (which really didn't post anything you couldn't see in a Sears catalog), feminists banning facebook stuff, or maybe twitter with Adria Richards and the block bot. Pretty sure the BBC or CNN or whoever did a segment on the block bot and I'm not sure if Twitter allows people to block others or not, but it strangely resembles the SRS bot that bans anyone who posts to certain subreddits (like this one) from all SRS and SRS affiliated sub…
/r/MensRights06/11/13 12:52 AM
3

Don't have kids won't protect you now. With Obamacare you're already forced to support the decisions of single moms, and with federal/state taxes you're forced to assist them with food stamps and other benefits. I'm not against it if it were a real safety net, but the way society's been going, it's no longer a safety net, it's a way of life. I've got friends who are fucking medical doctors/nurses/engineers/scientists/business majors who are married, in relationships, etc, young (under 35) and ha…
/r/MensRights06/11/13 12:23 AM
2

If these predators were caught using drawings or computer generated images that they knew were fake (unlike this one that they thought was real), then maybe you'd have a case. You mean like this guy? Or are we talking about this kind of stuff? And yes, they were going around trying to see some real naked kids. But if you'll re-read my post, I wasn't disagreeing with combating that. What I was disagreeing with was the backyard pedo's that prey on our kids, not the ones half way around the world. …
/r/MensRights05/11/13 10:39 PM
2

And how many of those people are in the DoD and will never be punished? I'm not against this or anything, but I find it funny to what levels people will go to in order to "stop" the exploitation of children. Fake online pornography? Arrest them! Kids stripping on the internet? Arrest everyone! Some hot teacher fucks a student? Well, if it's a former student of legal age and the teacher is male, let's start a witch hunt. If it's a female teacher, let's do nothing. And if it makes the news, let's …
/r/MensRights05/11/13 08:57 PM
19

"I'm offended" is just another way of saying "I don't like what you're doing and I want you to stop". Of course no one would listen to you if you said the latter.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 08:09 PM
11

That's a fuckload, the time not the money. Even if you take something like regular university/college, 5 classes over a week, that's 4 or fewer hours a day. So it's basically a two year investment. I find it insane that we're pushing education on so many things that really shouldn't require education beyond high school. Two fucking years of school to become a barber? What?
/r/MensRights03/11/13 06:01 PM
4

Radical or not, I can't think of a single entity that represents "feminism" larger than NOW. I didn't discuss "new-wave" feminism as you called it, mainly because for the most part they're activity is limited to the internet. There are some that act in such fashion outside of the internet (the Toronto protests for example), but for the most part they really aren't affecting people's day to day lives (yet?). I think in my post I was mainly talking about feminism bitching in posts unrelated to fem…
/r/MensRights03/11/13 07:08 AM
14

I know every movement has their crazy people, and I wouldn't call disliking feminism crazy, but when every single thing repeatedly gets compared to "and feminists blah blah", it's a little disconcerting. Thoughts? The only thing I can really say here is this. There is a reason MRA's bash feminists, and it has some merit. Let me give you some examples. The National Organization for Women was against a bill recently that would have removed lifetime alimony and would have ensured an automatic share…
/r/MensRights03/11/13 06:35 AM
3

I don't think I ever had that moment where I realized it was legitimate. I was pretty much minding my own business until sometime around 2008/9 I don't really remember, someone linked this subreddit, I visited it, and it was that final piece in the puzzle. As if I saw everything that was wrong in my life, but it was all different pieces in a puzzle that I never connected and couldn't really piece together, so they were all just random events that went a certain way. After visiting men's rights, …
/r/MensRights03/11/13 05:29 AM
1

KFC and women's liberation? I don't get it.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 08:26 PM
5

Someone just watched transformers 3 and decided to write an article.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 04:39 PM
9

I'm glad the social justice warriors finally re-wrote the US Military Training Manual to acknowledge the superiority of the white race and the white males. Truly this is a blessed day and we should not squander it. We should rise up and purge the white race from the weak, the feeble, the sick, the stupid and the non white. /s
/r/MensRights01/11/13 04:25 PM
2

Because young guys would be at risk of having kids, while older guys who most likely already got that sorted out wouldn't.
/r/MensRights01/11/13 12:28 AM
-4

I don't think most men care about paternity leave, and some would be outright against it since it could hurt their employ-ability. American feminists (at least) also seem to be upper class and only focusing on women in the upper class. This is why they're vehemently defending things like lifetime alimony and no split custody during divorce, but have made absolutely no real change when it comes to maternity leave.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 11:42 PM
3

Well it's kind of true, just look at all those serial killers in the past. The only problem is they represent less than 0.01% of the population, so you're pretty going to have to shy away from every man out there. Gotta love rape hysteria.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 08:33 PM
4

There was this article recently that has some neat charts. There are over twice as many young women who had a kid than men and although you'd expect them to just have kids with older men, the chart doesn't really show that. Older men have had fewer kids than older women. And I'm only talking 25-44 here as "older". And as you can see, the really old ones are almost 1:1. If this trend continues, we'll have a lot more than just 15 million single moms and far fewer single dads. Looks like sooner or …
/r/MensRights31/10/13 08:15 PM
12

You don't want to get married fine. I understand that I am not telling you that you have too. Just don't tell me and others that we should boycott something we want to do. I'm not telling you, I'm telling other people the same way you're telling them to get married because it's worked out for you so far. Nobody's going to berate you for wanting to get married or for doing it. But I am getting tired of telling people for years not to get married and then when they get divorced, they come here to …
/r/MensRights31/10/13 07:32 PM
2

Which is exactly what I'm saying. The insurance companies for cars where women get lower rates are allowed to do this but not the ones for health care where men would get lower rates.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 07:14 PM
2

This is men forced to subsidize women's health care while things like car insurance can still use statistics to fuck men over and charge more. Go look it up above. sub·si·dize (sbs-dz) tr.v. sub·si·dized, sub·si·diz·ing, sub·si·diz·es To assist or support with a subsidy. To secure the assistance of by granting a subsidy.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 07:04 PM
18

You mean laws like lifetime alimony (or alimony in general)? Or how about that any child born into a marriage, the husband is assumed to be the legal father and legally responsible for the kid. If your wife cheats and you get divorced after another man's kid pops out, you're fucked for 18-25 years of child support. There's also no guarantee for anything in the future. The people who married in the 50's and 60's had no idea what hit them when no fault divorce came along in the 70's. There's also …
/r/MensRights31/10/13 07:02 PM
1

Only poll I could find related to the game. About 15% of the player base is women, so I do find it strange if the majority of "heroes" are men. I know games like pixie hollow are very popular with girls and all of the "heroes" in that game are female, so it's just catering to their users. I guess GW2 is just trying to be politically correct and so is everyone else in that thread. I haven't played GW2 so I really have no idea what's going on, nor do I really care.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 06:14 PM
1

Except they can change rates based on gender, that's what I'm on about.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 05:13 PM
5

Except that you know, guys never get pregnant. Point is that when it benefits women, insurance companies aren't allowed to take gender into account and can't exclude things from coverage. When it doesn't benefit women, you can argue anything you want to charge certain people more. You're basically forcing every man who chose to stay single, not have kids or is gay to subsidize women's choices and responsibilities. The same goes for all the single women out there who chose not to have kids.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 05:04 PM
2

Really? Allstate also takes gender into account. Esurance does the same. Even some company I've never heard of. So want to tell me again how we pay the same?
/r/MensRights31/10/13 05:01 PM
5

So why not do the same with car insurance?
/r/MensRights31/10/13 04:28 PM
2

I did the first picture here. and it's odd, but all the searches start in May 2012 and then abruptly stop in October. Almost like someone rigged google search for this campaign.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 04:26 PM
3

Women's rights and women history.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 04:19 PM
13

Don't know why you need an account now, but this has been a trend for a while. April and November are the highest spikes and repeat every year. It's obvious that if it's not women's studies (which it most likely is), it's at least students doing searches during the school year, most likely a final project type deal. In case you don't have a google account or don't feel like getting one, here's a screenshot.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 02:08 PM
15

Far more women give birth than men have penises re-attached. This is men forced to subsidize women's health care while things like car insurance can still use statistics to fuck men over and charge more.
/r/MensRights31/10/13 01:03 PM
6

It was done on campus so ages of women and men would be 18-25 or so. If more of the women had older partners than the men we can assume the guys were limited to women their age and under while the women had other age categories.
/r/MensRights30/10/13 03:23 PM
2

Tumblr isn't exactly something to worry about. I mean it's in a way the next wave of feminism, but there's a reason most of those people there either outright beg for money or have a paypal link. Social justice warriors are really toxic in society and wouldn't be able to function in any way outside of their echo chambers. I mean think about it, how many people have you seen like those Toronto feminists outside of their large groups?
/r/MensRights30/10/13 11:26 AM
5

A new study suggests that men and women might not be as far apart in sexual behaviors as previous research has shown. For example, women who thought their answers might be read reported an average of 2.6 sexual partners. But those who thought they were monitored by a lie detector reported an average of 4.4 sexual partners. Women who were not attached to the lie detector, but who had privacy during testing, gave answers in the middle – an average of 3.4 sexual partners. Men’s answers didn’t vary …
/r/MensRights30/10/13 10:33 AM
4

The crazy thing is that it sounds like it happened in India or something given his name, but it took place in the fucking UK. I thought we were past witch-hunts and lynching people. As for the people involved, how about we practice what we preach and assume they're innocent until proven guilty.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 08:47 PM
7

At 4% she should have paid him child support. And if the kid is better off with him why give her any custody? After all it's in the best interest of the child. At 50/50 no one should pay.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 03:04 AM
13

Keep complaining and see if wages go up. If they don't, keep complaining to see if it changes. If they do, keep complaining to see how far they'll go. It's like a 21st century union only for one gender. I'm sure the perfect outcome is to have women with long vacation times, short hours and the same (if not more) pay than the men who have much less. Someone's gotta pick up the bill.
/r/MensRights28/10/13 02:17 AM
2

Honestly this is one case where the payment should have been doubled. Yes it's unfair to pay for a woman who left you and you owe her nothing, but this guy is a scumbag. He crippled Italy's economy and fucked a lot of people over in order to take bribes and use the entire country as his get rich quick scheme. He deserves no sympathy and should be forced to live the rest of his life in a jail cell, kept alive by the best medical technology available. He has something like $6 billion and is what? …
/r/MensRights27/10/13 01:53 AM
1

I'm not saying maternity leave is bad, I'm just saying it does affect pay. If we're going to keep having these "pay gap" campaigns and keep discussing it, it's only fair for me to suggest an option that would reduce it (since it's apparently in the best interest of women). We could offer a paternity leave, but there's no guarantee of men taking it. Even if 20% of men don't take it, that's more than enough to create a gender gap in the executive and CEO level of every corporation out there. If 20…
/r/MensRights26/10/13 01:52 AM
21

Give it to some guys who would benefit from it (if you ever get serious cash), like dads fighting for their kids. I've got a feeling I'll be just fine without a bunch of extra cash (I probably don't deserve).
/r/MensRights26/10/13 01:45 AM
72

It's a joke. Feminists complain about slut shaming because men judge women on how they dress and how "it doesn't matter what a woman wears". Then they complain about how women are dressed in video games and how it "sexualizes" women (even though according to their own logic, nobody should be judging said women on what they wear). Then when people point out that all the men in video games are hulking masses of muscle in their underwear, they call it a "male power fantasy".
/r/MensRights26/10/13 01:07 AM
3

Women under 30, 60% of the birth rate. Basically any woman who is under 30 and is a single mom giving birth represents 6 out of 10 women who are having children. So 60% of women giving birth who are under 30 years old also happen to be single moms. But that number is growing, which is why feminists are complaining about the largest group of people living in poverty are single mothers. The real fun (would) start(s) when you ask questions like do these women know who the father is? Do they want th…
/r/MensRights26/10/13 12:59 AM
64

It's just regret. I mean it could happen to anyone. Who could have ever known that shoving someone to the ground, hitting them, forcing them into intercourse while they fight back and beg you not to was wrong? It could happen to anyone. Maybe they did tell me and I just wasn't lis And while we're on the topic, people should start teaching others not to drink and drive, and that drugs can create a dependency that could potentially ruin your life. After all, all this shit is still going on, so obv…
/r/MensRights26/10/13 12:47 AM
150

The only reason we see them as sluts is because of the male dominated gaming culture and the power fantasy involved demands women be scantily clad drunk at all times. Also wish someone told me not to fuck passed out women. You'd think that out of all the authority figures I ran into, all the sex ed courses, all the police officers who talked about all kinds of things, someone, somewhere could have told me that rape is wrong. Like murder. I never killed anyone because I was taught murder is wrong…
/r/MensRights26/10/13 12:25 AM
91

No adult needs $88,000 a month, let alone a child. For that much money I could live in a penthouse off of hookers, blow and booze with money to spare.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 09:00 PM
3

It's the birth rate, not raised. The current birth rate was 60% to single mothers for children born to women under the age of 30.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 07:52 PM
3

Yes that's part of it.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 08:06 AM
2

Anywhere, I know a few engineers, electricians, and people in the medical field that get paid hourly. As for paternity leave, I doubt most men would take it.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 07:53 AM
2

“I don’t give a damn about statistics,” Adams said. “I feel that using statistics participates in a rationalized way of thinking about the problem that undercuts my perspective.” Demanding statistical proof of the prevalence of the association between women and meat consumption, Adams said, was “deflecting the issue.” We should take this approach to everything. Companies trying to learn about their market and maximize their profits? Fuck statistics, we'll just wing it. Governments creating a bud…
/r/MensRights25/10/13 01:26 AM
8

I keep telling people, we need fucking quota's for women working jobs along side men. Keep track of the hours worked and then at the end of each week, women have to stay behind and work as much as the men. No more 9-5 bullshit. If the guys are doing 9-7 that's 10 hours each woman needs to make up for. She can either do those 10 hours through the week and hope she doesn't come up short, or if she does, she gets to come in on the weekend. This will ensure that women get paid equally for equal work…
/r/MensRights25/10/13 12:47 AM
2

Talk to a lawyer, but you might be in trouble. See this. And this. Annulment is your best bet. Not sure how it works, but maybe infidelity, duress to get married in the first place, fraud, etc.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 04:39 AM
-10

It happens both ways, there's stories out there of guys being killed because a girl falsely accused them of rape. But this is getting far more attention and she's still in one piece. Either way, it's bad that it happens at all. False accusers should be punished, even him, I don't care if it's mistaken identity. Just like the women who ruined men's lives in the past with false accusations, he had a negative impact on her life due to him pointing the finger at her.
/r/MensRights24/10/13 03:50 AM
3

More credible?
/r/MensRights23/10/13 02:01 AM
5

And it's okay because the babies won't remember it. Just like fucking a passed out girl. If she won't remember, it's okay.
/r/MensRights21/10/13 02:01 AM
1

We love you too. Wanna hang out? I have cake and tea.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 06:34 PM
1

Meh, guys have been doing it for a while. Wiki article.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 06:04 PM
5

Which sucks because last year around May we had 30,000 or so readers, I wouldn't have minded breaking the 100k barrier if they mentioned /r/mensrights.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 05:46 PM
18

Things women need to work on. Bad breath. It's insane how many women have bad breath and act like their shit don't stink. Wear clothes that are within your weight category. I've seen far too many overweight women wear something they shouldn't be caught dead in on laundry day, let alone as a choice. Shave your facial hair. That means your hairy ass sideburns, the hairy sides of your face and your mustache. Amazing how women walk around with hairy faces and think they can get away with bleaching t…
/r/MensRights19/10/13 04:26 AM
20

The best part is when modern women complain and say those women were worse off. The men got a quick death, but those women had to live without providers in poverty for the rest of their lives. Even though there were plenty of women in the workforce back then.
/r/MensRights19/10/13 12:20 AM
1

Depending on how long. Having a kid doesn't mean you can take 20 years off.
/r/MensRights17/10/13 07:44 PM
1

The girls look like minors.
/r/MensRights15/10/13 02:33 AM
3

It's not even that, they just outright make shit up. They have this thing every year where they claim 100,000 girls and women are being trafficked to the Superbowl for prostitution. Police took them seriously and ramped up security. They made something like half a dozen arrests and all of them were just regular prostitutes. And it's not about the women. The girl who chose to be a prostitute or the girl who gets raped. It's about punishing men. That's why the definition is being broadened and ins…
/r/MensRights14/10/13 01:49 AM
0

Only because most women avoid weightlifting like the plague.
/r/MensRights13/10/13 08:57 AM
3

But according to that chart they only need to meet the 3rd class which is 135 points for people 17-26 years old. That's 3 pullups, 60 crunches and a 24:40 minute 3 mile run. And that's both men and women. This isn't about minimum score but the minimum required to complete the test. In fact with 70 crunches and a 23:00 minute 3 mile run, they wouldn't have to do any pullups (and still get a higher score by 19 points).
/r/MensRights13/10/13 04:54 AM
2

That's bullshit. Bullshit because they want equality and bullshit because they can do it, but the military is going easy on them (at least so I thought). This chick can do 20. So why can't female marines do more than fucking 3? Anyway this is weird but according to this the minimum for men is 3, so it might not be that crazy? But that chick would still get a perfect score, so it's not like having similar expectations is sexist. But yeah, I don't think this is that sexist as long as the score req…
/r/MensRights13/10/13 03:37 AM
10

Funny how they lack that comment when teachers are the ones responsible. Specifically "children have it worse".
/r/MensRights11/10/13 01:54 AM
1

Stop domestic violence? I don't think you understand. All a woman has to do is call the police and tell them her husband was hitting her (abuse marks and proof not required). They'll remove him and keep him out of his own house (they don't even have to be married), he'll go to jail, possibly lose his career and have his life ruined. I don't buy into this whole thing of women being stupid, so I believe feminists got exactly what they wanted.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 01:13 AM
1

Dose of their own medicine and all that. You don't have to approve of this in order to do it. If they want to start throwing shit, it's only fair we let them know what they're getting themselves into. Better to stop it now than regret it in the future.
/r/MensRights11/10/13 01:09 AM
6

The fact that kids who are finally growing up and able to think for themselves can realize that they're not alone and they're not the fucked up individuals they've been raised to believe they are. And men who are left with nothing, devastated and depressed have someone to talk to. Those are the two biggest things I would say.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 11:48 PM
1

Consequences and accountability are only for men.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 11:47 PM
1

It's true to some extent though. And this applies to women as well. If some rich, 5-10 years older, successful, famous guy were to do the same to women, they wouldn't complain at least most wouldn't. I know a few girls who are hot as hell and turn guys down by the dozen, but each and every one of them has a guy, George Clooney, Brad Pitt, Lenny Kravitz, etc. If those guys ever made a move on them, they'd be wetter than Niagara Falls, even though they never met any of those men (and hypotheticall…
/r/MensRights10/10/13 11:41 PM
1

True but only to an extent. And by that I mean the glass ceiling vs the glass cellar arguments and other "privileges" they notice about straight white men while completely being ignorant to their own (considering most are college educated and have the time and money to get such an education). Additionally they don't actually do any fighting. "Tech men not to rape" or "Men can stop rape" is not fighting anything. How do you think people would react if blacks walked around with signs saying "Teach…
/r/MensRights10/10/13 10:53 PM
4

It's amazing what people will learn when they no longer assume the men to be perpetrators and women victims.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 10:41 PM
1

There's that, but there's also the fact that government benefits aren't being handed out anymore. After all, we've heard nothing but complaints about single mothers being the fastest growing group living in poverty. If programs stop providing assistance, they're on their own. Some places still have enough funds until the end of the moth, but others have already run out. You can read about it here.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/13 06:41 PM
6

I'm guessing the same way given they said small change. So instead of $123.45 it's $123,45. Or 3,14159265 and so on. Read about it here.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 04:50 AM
5

Use another browser to visit a subreddit you posted in. If you're not logged in with that account and don't see your post, you're banned.
/r/MensRights10/10/13 02:11 AM
1

I wonder what the percentage of women is that want to work in a male only environment. As in being the only woman there.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 11:39 PM
2

My point is that if you have already formed a loving relationship with someone, crude facts such as these shouldn't get in the way of that love, especially when it comes to children. Why not? This guy just learned his wife lied to him and his entire marriage and family is a lie. Forming relationships is one thing, but there are certain things people expect. If a woman found out that 16 years after giving birth her child was swapped at the hospital after birth, don't you think she'd want to find …
/r/MensRights09/10/13 08:52 PM
2

he's expected to grade papers and tests, support students and develop new teaching methods. I thought they just used graduate students for that.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 06:16 PM
0

And yet when people were bitching about male and female actors and that wage gap, it was due to sexism. While here it's somehow women having a better personality.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 06:14 PM
-7

Yes, but feminists did call it "creepy" and "men taking advantage of women" when the reverse happened. Hell even in this video they call it "child sex trafficking" (although I do kind of agree with the prostitution, but in that case, dating is prostitution) proves the point. Older men and younger women is frowned upon these days, simply because older women demand that older men remain available to them (the successful worth having older men anyway).
/r/MensRights09/10/13 05:55 PM
1

Life has not been kind to Biggie Shortie.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 05:45 PM
1

That's the most retarded thing I've ever read. Some people want to have their own damn kids. If having any kid was enough, why would so many women go through the pain of childbirth when they could just adopt? There's no shortage of orphans. Point is that someone else made this choice for him. Would it be fair to tell a woman "no you can't have kids, you're going to adopt this one"? Or "we see you're doing very well for yourself with your career, you'll be assigned an additional two children of o…
/r/MensRights09/10/13 05:39 PM
1

Don't forget posting private info. I got shadowbanned a few years back for posting a link from someones facebook from the fucking article that was what the reddit link went to (this was just before the facebook rule).
/r/MensRights09/10/13 05:16 PM
2

California has a new bill that allows a child to have multiple parents.
/r/MensRights09/10/13 05:56 AM
4

Actually the point is that they'll take the penalty over paying.
/r/MensRights08/10/13 09:55 PM
8

Meh. If you told feminists to hit the gym, keep clean, shave, read books by men, watch male sports, etc they'd flip their shit. I'm also surprised she didn't tell men to go to college. After all, women need more "good men".
/r/MensRights08/10/13 05:53 PM
2

Not really. Benevolent sexism implies that women are second class citizens in our society along for the ride while men are completely in control. Is the fact that more men are politicians, fortune 500 CEO's or self made billionaires benevolent sexism? I highly doubt people would call it sexist that Warren Buffet, Bill Gates or Steve Jobs did what they did and became rich and famous. Or that women are benevolently sexist towards men by stepping down to have kids, raise them while men are being pr…
/r/MensRights08/10/13 03:07 PM
31

One thing I always hated about school (before college) was that asking questions was "disturbing the class". Like asking math questions about "why is this useful" or "when will this ever be useful" is seen as you trying to weasel your way out of learning the lesson. But that's not true. In order to really understand anything you need to be able to relate it to something, to justify it's function and justify why you're learning it. Otherwise you're learning something without really understanding …
/r/MensRights08/10/13 02:33 PM
3

So men's rights wants to smash the patriarchy and these feminists are saying no.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 06:28 PM
2

That's because the wage gap between white women, black women and Hispanic women is beneficial to them (they can keep claiming they need more money). Here's a chart that shows the difference. Asians have the highest earnings, followed by whites, then blacks then Hispanics. White women earn more than black men and Asian women earn almost the same as white men (which is probably why affirmative action doesn't help Asians). It's almost like emphasis on (real) education equates to income.
/r/MensRights05/10/13 03:00 AM
16

That's fucking hilarious, because of one little thing. And this plus this are it. It's been free for women to discriminate against guys since the site existed.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 11:03 PM
3

It's not really untrue. I mean feminism mostly helped upper class white women.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 10:55 PM
7

This is how feminists help men too.
/r/MensRights04/10/13 10:00 PM
1

They want Equality+, aka equality, chivalry and then some. I mean just look at all the articles about "having it all", how many men complain about not having it all? How many complaints are out there that a guy doesn't have the perfect career, the perfect wife, the perfect family, etc? And yet we constantly hear from career women who missed their opportunity to have kids, are still looking for Mr. Perfect, etc and how society needs to change so that women can have it all. That's the reason women…
/r/MensRights04/10/13 08:08 PM
-1

Won't work since you can't take away the rights of the child by law. So the guy will still be stuck with child support, no matter what the woman does to get knocked up.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 10:04 PM
3

3rd plea deal after violating her court order and if she doesn't fuck up, her record and the case will be expunged.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 07:59 PM
1

It doesn't matter if fat = lazy or lazy = fat, people usually don't like lazy people and being fat does imply laziness. The whole point of shaming fat people isn't that you know/don't know they're lazy, it's just something people do, aka prejudice. People will always make assumptions and judge others based on how they look, how they're dressed, etc. It's a lot harder to come to the conclusion that someone is lazy if they don't "dress the part", such as being fat for example. This is why most peo…
/r/MensRights03/10/13 07:55 PM
1

Shaming someone for their haircut is not equivalent to shaming someone for their race. Just like shaming someone for their clothes is not equivalent to shaming someone for their gender. Some things are under your control, others are not. If I said fat people are lazy, because you know, people want to be thin, they want to look good and they want to be healthy and feel good, that's not really that bad. Especially once you realize that most fat people actually would love to be thin. At that point …
/r/MensRights03/10/13 12:57 AM
-1

Well at least they're all young and hot. When they get old, fat and ugly, they better start shutting the fuck up. I see a new generation of bitter suburban housewives in the future.
/r/MensRights03/10/13 12:49 AM
1

Tax deduction? Are you talking about the deductible? If you are, what that means is that you have to pay $3000 out of pocket before the insurance kicks in. If it's anything like car accidents, you have to pay the deductible each time you go to the hospital, so there's a good chance that if all of your bills over your lifetime are under $3000, you'll never actually get anything from the insurance company, even though you've been paying them all this time.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 05:42 PM
10

Well technically it's still allowed here, I mean just look at hooters.
/r/MensRights29/09/13 01:32 AM
4

I feel sorry for Australians, they seem to be getting hit from all sides lately. Anyway, if women want promotions so badly, we need to start having quota's. Quota's for hours worked. Women need to stay behind and make sure they put in just as much time into their job as the most competitive men, that when when a promotion is available, they won't be disadvantaged by having worked who knows how many years worth of man hours less than their fellow men (we are talking executive and CEO positions he…
/r/MensRights28/09/13 05:36 AM
2

Gross. I guess those dirtbags are backed so far into a corner that they’ll latch onto anything they can get, even when it’s actually fairly ambiguous. Projection much? That said, given how far out of whack things seem right now in gaming (and tech), I can understand why people would latch onto something like GTA as a clear and extremely popular example of what they see as a very real problem right now. It’s still a very young medium with a lot of very tough growing to do, so in some ways it’s on…
/r/MensRights28/09/13 03:08 AM
1

I think it's time we pick a piece of the world where we can send all these women to in order to prove us wrong. Just make sure to build 100 foot high 30 feet thick walls around that area, wouldn't want them to just get out and brush off their responsibilities.
/r/MensRights28/09/13 12:28 AM
1

Why the complaints? Because White Ribbon Night (and presumably by extension, White Ribbon Day, and White Ribbon itself) is a campaign to stop violence against women, not violence against women and men, therefore it is sexist. I wonder how she'd react if when confronted with violence against women, I'd simply shrug my shoulders and told her that I'm more interested in stopping violence against men. I can already hear the roar of a thousand outraged women calling me a misogynist. I wonder why that…
/r/MensRights28/09/13 12:13 AM
3

It does confront the notion that women are better/more peaceful than men.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 11:59 PM
1

Then let them. If someone's going to make a martyr out of a person who calls guys scum or pulls fire alarms, then I doubt too many people will want to be associated with them.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 11:49 PM
1

I didn't read your comment, but is it really about men's rights?
/r/MensRights27/09/13 11:10 PM
5

It's not even the unreasonable expectations that bother me, it's the never ending articles of not enough men living up to their expectations.
/r/MensRights25/09/13 04:14 PM
11

Well to go with divorce and child custody, she could talk about contraception, what's available for men and women, abortion rights for men and women, and abuse of contraception. For example this guy was jailed for poking holes in his condom, yet I've never heard of a woman being arrested or jailed for doing the same with the pill. Here's a video of some people discussing it. Additionally, child support and how it's enforced. Here's an example. Notice in one of their sources a guy was told to sto…
/r/MensRights24/09/13 04:19 PM
26

I like how this is misogynistic, yet there's plenty of tv shows/movies about only men being infected/dying. Sliders had one where 99% of the men were dead and the last 1% were used as breeders.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 01:25 PM
2

The only time you actually see #2 is when you call out #1.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 01:26 AM
1

People are also spending more on food than ever before and it's all a lie thanks to credit and debt.
/r/MensRights21/09/13 09:38 PM
1

NSFW and "explained".
/r/MensRights20/09/13 05:17 AM
5

Actually even the whole anti-Seminism is insane. Okay so Europe has had some bad Jew hating in the past. But: (v) Public approval or d enial of the Holocaust . Is defined as a hate crime which you can be imprisoned for. That's insane. So just because someone says the holocaust didn't happen we'll throw them into prison? Shit is whack.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 05:15 AM
3

So Iran executes homosexuals and canada is being criticized by them? I didn't realize Canada started executing people for random reasons.
/r/MensRights20/09/13 05:03 AM
10

First his 13 year old girl can't dress like a slut, next she'll be forced to wear a burkah by the time she's 16. WHY WON'T YOU PEOPLE UNDERSTAND THIS IS OPPRESSION! We should be encourageing young girls to wear C-Strings to the mall, not sundresses and whatever else you shitlords want. How can I ever bitch about the objectification of women if they're dressed modestly? I need content damnit, content!
/r/MensRights20/09/13 04:42 AM
2

Ironically, she probably thinks she's too good for you.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 08:28 PM
5

Don't forget single mothers and poverty. Roughly 1 in 4 US households belongs to single mothers. They also earn less than their married counterparts and have to do the housework, raise the kid(s) and still have to go to work after all of that. I bet those women are thrilled.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 04:59 PM
2

Here you go.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 04:52 PM
21

Tomorrow: Ladies, could you spot a rapist? He's the attractive guy, the charming guy, the social guy, but not always. He's successful, he's always available and always there for you, and sometimes he's not. He's caring, understanding and very knowledgeable about women, except when he isn't. He will almost always work in an office environment, acting as a leader, is very educated and more knowledgeable than his peers, but other times he can seem like the dumbest person you've met. He could be som…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 10:53 AM
4

Why not. At the very least people should be aware of marriage. I see plenty of arguments and articles stating that married men are happier than single men, but it would be more accurate to compare never married men vs married and divorced men. We could wipe out almost 60% of male suicides by avoiding all the downfalls that come with divorce. And I sure as shit don't think women will be as likely to ditch their partner if they don't get all the security and benefits provided by divorce.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 10:14 AM
2

Well it's late and I'm tired, but this made little sense to me. But then again she did alienate half the population and I do wonder if this had anything to do with it.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 10:11 AM
2

Stop getting married. I don't feel like doing too much research into this but: showed divorced/separated men’s suicides to be 14,850 per year. and men suicide : 25848 25848 - 14850 = 10998 or 57.5% of all male suicides are men who are divorced.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 09:27 AM
2

Divorces went up. Mind you that the marriage rate also went down, so that flat area is actually divorce on the rise compared to previous marriage/divorce rates. Divorce related suicides are insane and make up the vast majority of suicides (yet they keep telling us married men are happier). There was also this and this. It's not so much that you lose your job, it's that you basically lose everything you have to live for.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 09:19 AM
2

Well given how India does their arranged marriages, I would assume at least half the people are men. But I guess it varies by culture.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 09:10 AM
6

Tell her not to get fat.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 08:02 PM
47

What does that tell you about feminism and feminists if you can't even criticize them without soon possibly risking jail time.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 06:57 PM
3

I don't think it's increased, just like I don't think the rate of female teachers fucking their underage students have increased. I think it's just more normal to report these things and confront them. I mean even today, hot female teacher fucks a 14 year old boy? Slap on the wrist. 10 years ago people might have just told her to cut it out, 20 years ago they might have been jealous. Hard to tell. But few people truly feel like she should be punished even today.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 01:09 AM
6

Whoa there, are you saying women should take responsibility for their feelings? That they should somehow focus their dollars on comics that don't make them feel like shit? And by doing so, somehow create a market for themselves? Wouldn't that be convenient for you, forcing women to take responsibility for your misogyny. Next you'll make up some word to explain this, like hypoagency.
/r/MensRights18/09/13 01:03 AM
19

Since the beginning of human civilization, men have been the dominant sex. No one stopped women from pulling their own weight. In fact, in most societies it was expected. Only the very wealthy could afford to keep women locked up, mainly due to not having paternity testing. Women worked the fields along side of men and even fought along side in Gaul versus the Rome for example. But now, for the first time, a host of indicators suggest that women are not only achieving equality with men but are f…
/r/MensRights18/09/13 12:17 AM
1

Don't know how it's in Australia, but if it's anything like the US, then they don't really just pick on merit and qualifications. It's all revolving doors for their corporate partners. The only problem here is that women don't have enough connections on both ends. But either way, for people who really want to get rid of sexism, they're really focusing on gender a lot lately.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 06:41 PM
5

That's because most people don't see a problem with the current system, they see a problem with the men who are no longer "manning up" and stepping up to the plate.
/r/MensRights17/09/13 03:43 PM
29

How did they not just assume it was her husband? Also, how the hell has she been doing this for 13 years? It just seems crazy to me that it took this long to catch someone like this.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 05:56 PM
2

Well they most likely are star football/basketball players.
/r/MensRights14/09/13 02:25 AM
1

They were over the age of 20. I think those laws mainly apply when people are within 2-4 years of each other. And given that mens rea doesn't exist for statutory rape, I doubt any sex occurred between them. But this is the UK, so I'm not entirely sure.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 11:36 PM
3

It's still inequality. 60-70% of those women won't find a man worth marrying.
/r/MensRights13/09/13 11:30 PM
1

Only links I'm getting on several google searches are back to that blog. Any link to a copy of the actual article?
/r/MensRights13/09/13 11:25 PM
2

There was this I read a while back. It links to a bunch of sources. The main part that was of interest: I said before that the top 2.6% of men were responsible for 29% of the lays. For the same proportion of women, 2.6% (n = 491) are responsible for 18.8% of the lays among women. That means the top guys are taking a much bigger share of the lays than the top girls are. The sluttiest guys are sluttier than the sluttiest girls. The only way that’s possible is if slutty guys are banging girls less …
/r/MensRights13/09/13 11:05 PM
2

The male inmates also get in trouble for masturbating if a female guard sees them.
/r/MensRights04/09/13 02:00 AM
6

I still don't get how that turned out. Assaulting the bus driver was a felony, yet she got the victim treatment afterwards.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 11:51 PM
1

Because you got a lot out of it. Then women had their sexual revolution and abandoned their gender roles. Now you get nothing but are still expected to keep up your end of the bargain.
/r/MensRights02/09/13 10:36 PM
51

He owes child support so he can't get a passport. He's not going anywhere for a while.
/r/MensRights01/09/13 12:10 AM
7

Being very muscular.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 05:01 AM
9

We do know. She said so herself. She's never been "attacked" but she's afraid, and then starts crying.
/r/MensRights30/08/13 04:58 AM
3

You won't notice unless you come back later. There will be posts that had 30-40 upvotes that will be in the negatives and vice versa. They're fighting for imaginary Internet points.
/r/MensRights19/08/13 12:31 AM
1

Good tweezers last a long time though. That's like me expecting her to be satisfied with going to the movie theatre once every 5+ years.
/r/MensRights18/08/13 02:30 PM
75

The bigger issue here is that after 50 years of feminism men are still expected to fulfill their traditional gender roles.
/r/MensRights11/08/13 08:52 PM
1

Because women find 80% of men as below average. So even if the upper half of men hit on women, there will be more creeps hitting on them than men they want to hit on them.
/r/MensRights09/08/13 08:00 PM
2

Until we're talking child support. Then he did 50% of the work and has an obligation.
/r/MensRights07/08/13 07:41 PM
9

I find it amazing how alcohol is presumed to harm kids and their developing minds, but they hand out these super addictive pills like candy. If those things weren't harmful, why the hell do I need a prescription to get my hands on them?
/r/MensRights31/07/13 04:19 AM
1

Gotta love the walk in closet is in the bathroom idea. Every time you shower or shit you fuck up your clothes.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 10:26 PM
2

You miss the point where sex is about power to women not men. When was the last time a man used sex to get his way, what he wanted or to control a significant other?
/r/MensRights30/07/13 09:55 PM
4

I'm pretty sure everyone's fucked once the US finally leaves. No way is Russia going to allow Afghanistan to continue existing after the immense amount of heroin being pushed into Russia from Afghanistan, fucking over its economy and citizens.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 09:00 AM
0

Maybe they say it because they don't mean it as much? Kind of like that stereotype where guys find it impossible to tell a woman he cares about "I love you", but me personally, I don't mean it so I could tell any woman I love her no problem. Doesn't mean I'm in touch with my feelings or love everyone.
/r/MensRights30/07/13 03:36 AM
3

We are talking about items on public display, in all fairness. If that's what you want to focus on, fine. But it still doesn't change the bigger picture. The problem still is the lies within the article. Never once in my entire life have I seen these magazines openly displayed in the candy section at a child's eye level. At worst, they were always on the highest part of the magazine stand, usually on a unique magazine stand, behind countless other types of magazines. And that's shown in the very…
/r/MensRights29/07/13 07:37 AM
4

I don't really see the problem with "modesty bags" personally. Include all the headlines on the cover and you get the same deal. People who regularly buy them still will. A lot of magazines already do something like this. Because of this. Women and Equalities Minister Jo Swinson said the Co-op's move was "very welcome". And this. Gender equality groups UK Feminista and Object joined forces with lawyers to launch the Lose the Lads' Mags campaign earlier this year. And it's not just the lad mags, …
/r/MensRights29/07/13 06:49 AM
13

Fuck that, what about those magazines that try to justify women cheating and how it's his fault she cheats. If I threw my wife under the bus and fucked her sister/best friend because she tried to use sex as a means to take control over the relationship, do you really think anyone would give me any sympathy? What about if I "got bored"? Probably even less then. I'm amazed at this wave of censorship in the UK. What the hell is going on over there? Are these women so desperate? They obviously have …
/r/MensRights29/07/13 05:00 AM
1

Those youtube comments. Holy shit, how desperate do you have to be to keep pointing people to the text book definition of feminism.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 10:59 PM
3

And once again, gender mattered. The givers were 40 percent more likely to have sisters than the people who made more self-serving, competitive choices. (There was no difference in the number of brothers; it was the number of sisters, not siblings, that predicted greater giving.) And Professor Van Lange’s team pointed to another study showing that the more sisters a father has, the more time he spends raising his own children. After growing up with sisters, men who have opportunities to give are…
/r/MensRights28/07/13 09:41 PM
3

It's funny how sexist this is. She's basically arguing that women have no agency and are incapable of doing anything. Everything in this world is made by men and provided to women by men. If the men ceased to exist women wouldn't even know how to dress themselves.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 09:19 PM
1

Quite a bit plumper than their European counterparts. I'm disappointed.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 07:37 PM
3

How about like this. If you can remove age, gender, race, social economic status and everything else from someone and after being judged, the outcome is the same as if you hadn't removed those things, then we have equality. This applies to educational, job opportunities or the way you're treated in court, etc.
/r/MensRights28/07/13 01:55 AM
5

Everything feminism has said men did to women in the past is what they want to do to men in the present.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 11:25 PM
-5

I'm sure Michelle Jenneke is pissed about being sexualized, given all the fame, attention and money she's received. Not to mention she took a few modeling gigs. Now the question we need to ask ourselves is, is she suffering from thin privilege? Because men never make such comments about hambeasts.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 11:17 PM
2

A lot of people wouldn't be parents if we started taking kids away because we don't agree with them or their abilities to be good parents.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 10:17 PM
3

You should see the anti DV ad of a man eating breakfast with his kids. In case you're curious.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 06:58 PM
1

Already looked it up on Wikipedia and the CDC. They are in fact comparing rates. No need for examples.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 03:54 AM
-7

When people say x is more likely to do something than y, they're comparing numbers, not rates. Any time anyone says men are 4 times likely to do x, they're not comparing rates, they're comparing the number of suicides by both genders and then dividing the larger by the smaller. It's only fair to maintain that standard.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 02:23 AM
3

Point is that numerically speaking, even though there are more women than men, 20% more women tried to commit or plan a suicide than men. That's my point. Title is misleading.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 02:11 AM
1

Looks like eastern europe. Which seems strange, due to the lack of feminism in that region. But honestly, women have always been the "boss" of the household, so I'm not surprised. What I do find surprising is him trying to sneak out the balcony when the front door was less than 15 feet away (I have not only lived in these apartment buildings, but have seen enough to know the basic layout). He must have truly been terrified of her. And yes before anyone starts, I get the fact that his wife locket…
/r/MensRights27/07/13 01:44 AM
5

Guns don't jam often, even if you survive the bullet, you'll most likely die of blood loss before help arrives. It's not like people will be standing nearby ready to dial 911 right away.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 01:24 AM
7

I'm sure they will. They just have their hands full with the equal custody bullshit. And once enough men are have been living for long enough with women, that's when they'll spring the trap. If they do it now, they'll only fuck over a few.
/r/MensRights27/07/13 12:35 AM
58

Maybe I misread it but there was this part During 2008-2009, an estimated 1.0 million (annual average) adult males in the United States (1.0% of the adult male population) made suicide plans in the past year. Among males, prevalence ranged from 0.1% in Georgia to 4.1% in Rhode Island. During 2008-2009, an estimated 1.2 million (annual average) adult females in the United States (1.0% of the female population) made suicide plans in the past year. Among females, prevalence ranged from 0.1% in Geor…
/r/MensRights27/07/13 12:25 AM
21

If misandry don't real, then I guess people shouldn't mind if I take some comments made by feminists and simply reverse the genders? She's an over privileged white cunt who hasn't had to work for anything in her life and was handed everything she has on a silver platter. We need to drastically reduce the female population in order to keep bitches like her in check. Only keep a small 5-10% amount for breeding purposes, get rid of the rest. The fact that she doesn't recognize the struggle man face…
/r/MensRights26/07/13 10:48 PM
6

Bulk marriage. 33 women per wedding.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 09:41 PM
2

You'll still have to pay for the wedding, and who knows what will replace the engagement ring? Perhaps a nicer honeymoon to where she wants to go? Either way, fuck marriage.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 09:31 PM
6

So 300,000 british pounds + 13,000 british pounds + child support which will be calculated at a later date. This guy's going to be out a million dollars before this is over.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 09:17 PM
10

Nobody did that either when they were buying houses. Look at the foreclosures and the economic downturn that brought about. People are stupid, and there's enough stupid people out there doing enough stupid things to affect everyone around the world. If you're getting married all you're doing is signing a contract stating that you don't believe that other person will fuck you over, but you give them the ability to do so if they please. Nothing means shit at that point because even if that person …
/r/MensRights26/07/13 08:55 PM
2

Hmm, strange. The people I've heard from always stated pay was the same and there was a lack of women. Guess I'll have to look into it.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 06:10 PM
10

According to this article, black people need to shut the fuck up about racism and their socioeconomic status because over 70%+ of people in the NFL/NBA are black.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 05:25 PM
82

We already know and I really wish more companies took the "equal work for equal pay" to heart. And what I mean by this is very easy to notice if you take a trip to costco, walmart, target, etc. You'll have female and male retail workers. The women fold clothes and stock some of the shelves. The men unload merchandise from trucks and stock some of the shelves. Equal work my ass.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 05:18 PM
4

If you're not sure what you're looking for you should check out /r/tumblrinaction. There's a lot of like minded people there who like to bash on the tumblr feminists.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 06:08 AM
3

That's why they went 4 decades unchecked. I'm glad people are finally standing up to them, even if it seems pointless. The kind of shit happening today, like being able to call a feminist out on her shit would have never been possible a decade ago.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 05:08 AM
16

Trying to give women a free ride into the gaming world when they haven't done shit? At least as far as sarkeesian goes. Most of the things she complains about have been "fixed" or no longer exist at the level she's implying in her videos. She hasn't done a damn thing to change anything in the industry.
/r/MensRights26/07/13 04:58 AM
31

He pretty much revolutionized video games by making doom and the FPS genre. He's mainly famous for being an incredible programmer. One of the greatest feats attributed partially to him (but not everyone's sure of who all the people involved were) is Fast inverse square root algorithm which allowed games like Quake 3 to run on hardware they shouldn't have been able to run on. He also personally created a few other features that revolutionized gaming. Here's a game he showed off on the iPhone. It …
/r/MensRights26/07/13 04:44 AM
1

The message is saying that because 90% of teen parents don't marry each other you're going to be stuck on your own. It implies that 90% of teen dads are deadbeat dads who disappear. It's misleading by taking one statistic and applying the attributes of another to it. Why don't they just use the real % number of what teen moms are stuck on their own with no support from the dad? Why drag the whole 90% number into this and then imply something completely different?
/r/MensRights26/07/13 03:09 AM
4

poverty facing women and girls in Canada. Single motherhood was frowned upon by many cultures throughout history. Perhaps it's because they raise criminals and are a drain on the society? Just a guess? “She has a 50% chance of being sexually or physically abused in her lifetime.” See this is bullshit. Not the 50% number itself, but the fact that they throw physical abuse in with sexual abuse. Given that sexual abuse is more serious than physical, I can only come to the conclusion that physical a…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 09:39 PM
0

I think this is more about raising awareness right now than "killing little shits". Link to a real issue, like feminists in the UK fighting against a law that would keep all men accused of rape anonymous until convicted or in the US that would end lifetime alimony and give equal custody during divorce. Not some single persons sexist opinion or demand. You'll never be able to back up an argument about what a single person said when that person is a random nobody on the internet. There's only so m…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 09:23 PM
3

There are bigger fish to fry, no need to focus on every little shit on the Internet.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 09:03 PM
4

With a bonus of government support. But the real issue is the 90% don't marry. That doesn't mean 90% of teen moms are left hanging. How many of those 90% still get support (voluntarily) and are living with the guy who's the dad? Just because a guy won't go to the sacrificial altar of marriage doesn't mean he's a deadbeat.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 09:02 PM
2

If she did send those pictures, she could be charged with possession, production and distribution. But that would create a scandal across the nation if she were charged and convicted.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 08:51 PM
3

Not an MRA issue. It's a shitty relationship and they need to deal with it themselves. The reason I say it's not an MRA issue is because A) it's an individual thing and B) because that whole subreddit sees the person asking the question as the victim, regardless of gender.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 08:46 PM
2

The poor women who had to write it.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 07:08 PM
3

Because that's the world we live in. NSA spying, economy collapsing, poverty on the rise, middle class dying don't matter, but abortions/gay marriage (when republicans are trying to get voted in) and shit like this all make headlines. It's basically a red herring. You really think our politicians or even the citizens of this country care about fixing the economy? That would mean sacrificing, taking action and becoming involved. Basically doing what's hard. Everyone would rather just kick the can…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 07:05 PM
-1

I think in the case of teen pregnancy men are primarily responsible for leaving. I would leave too if she got knocked up without my consent or simply got knocked up and called it my baby. All this ad is doing is pointing out cold hard numbers. If you're a teenage girl who gets pregnant, chances are your dude will disappear. The numbers are there, but they don't represent shit. I think Forbes had an article about single motherhood and all the women there chose to stay single because a) they thoug…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 06:45 PM
24

Feminism, we're all about the free shit "owed" to us now.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 03:35 PM
2

Because women only see the men who are their equal or above, especially the ones above. He's just rolling with the gravy train. This is why you always hear about the fabled male oppressors of yonder past, while never really hearing about all those peasants who were sacrificed to the gods of progress and industry.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 07:27 AM
1

I've got a strange feeling that if it truly was the end of white men, it wouldn't bode well for white women. Wonder if I'll live long enough to see Sharia law in Europe and if I do, you can bet all the "man up" calls for help will go ignored.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 07:24 AM
2

I used Ontario public buses for years and I've never seen any type of harassment. Then again, I only used them between the hours of 7AM to 12AM.
/r/MensRights25/07/13 07:17 AM
3

Except that there were a lot of lynchings, including of white men, based on the accusations of rape from white women. This wasn't to "control" women, it was to protect them. The only people who actually controlled women were those born into wealth and nobility. And the only reason they did that was because of paternity. In return those women had better lives than anyone else. And I'm sure many of them could have refused marriage and could have gone on playing with the shit cards everyone else wa…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 06:46 AM
3

Not to mention that in this culture, being irresponsible will mean that you'll be rewarded, while being responsible will mean you'll have to support and carry all those who aren't. Just look at the housing bubble and bailouts. All the people who opted out of buying homes because they were too expensive still got fucked in the end. And if this is spousal abuse, then using sex as a means to an end in order to gain control over the relationship or whatever should definitely be categorized that way.…
/r/MensRights25/07/13 06:29 AM
2

David Futrelle?
/r/MensRights25/07/13 04:08 AM
7

It is an absolute tragedy that so many young men come to see killing themselves as the only way out of their problems, and we need to do so much more to support them. But then... Men are not oppressed in our society, and to claim that they are merely bolsters a sense of male entitlement which all too often expresses itself in aggression and violence towards women. So men need help, but they need to shut up as well. If men want more “rights” in the family courts – which is what they seem to be eq…
/r/MensRights24/07/13 04:54 PM
2

Porch Monkeys.
/r/MensRights24/07/13 05:42 AM
0

Remember guys, be Ken not Ted.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 09:29 PM
2

If they're going to do all of this, I just wish they kept women in their own section. Like have women only military patrols, groups, etc. Not only do the women not meet the same requirements as the men, but the men are more likely to do stupid things trying to protect said women.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 08:55 PM
1

No way that will happen. One thing I noticed about slut shaming is that they always screamed at the void, never targeting men. I'm sure even the crazy ones realize most of the people doing it are other women.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 08:34 PM
1

Someone should show them all those articles about the red rose stories and similar incidents. Either way, censorship is stupid shit. Oh and I'm guessing this is Britain's idiotic response to increasing marriage rates and pregnancy rates.
/r/MensRights23/07/13 08:14 PM
27

2) Editorial Author says AA should change it's ways to be more helpful for women Funny how they want this for women and AA, but boys and school? They need to try harder.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 04:19 PM
1

So it's basically like every other article of its kind so far and it's about traditionalism.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 04:24 PM
7

Obviously this is misogyny due to the lack of female characters.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 02:01 AM
1

So any mirror?
/r/MensRights21/07/13 01:35 AM
17

So how much is she paying in child support? And if she isn't paying, she won't be on the streets for long, right?
/r/MensRights20/07/13 08:33 PM
-5

If that were the case then consent under duress would still count as consent.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 12:57 PM
-7

Not that I want to defend her, but she could be just lazy and used online material for screenshots/etc instead of trying to figure out how to record her own.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 12:49 PM
10

Once again the feminist twist the issue at hand. Additionally, how were the don't be that guy posters focusing on all violence and genders, yet don't be that girl was an attack on feminism? It's bullshit all the way down.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 07:23 AM
4

Really irks me when they talk about diversity. So almost 15% of teachers are black but blacks account for under 12% of the population. Where are all these extra people going to come from and what's a "balanced" diversity number?
/r/MensRights20/07/13 07:14 AM
99

It's a great law if you want to fudge rape statistics.
/r/MensRights20/07/13 06:21 AM
11

Funny given the fact that she's the first minister for women. And there's no such thing for men, because you know, men are "everything else".
/r/MensRights19/07/13 07:44 PM
3

Love how all these feminists against fat phobia or whatever are either huge or fetishise fat women. I bet MC-Hammer hated big butt phobia.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 07:10 PM
3

I just call them slut shamers.
/r/MensRights19/07/13 03:42 AM
1

Title is misleading. Suicides are linked to the economic problem.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 02:26 PM
3

Hey it's their reasoning, not mine.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 12:23 PM
6

Not really, but I wouldn't put it above some people in the media asking "questions" like "why was he looking into that car in the first place?" or "what was he doing watching that child with no adults present?" or some nonsense.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 02:01 AM
2

Not even that, it's just that the person who fired her was a man. You never hear them complain about how it's tougher for beautiful women to find work when all the HR departments responsible are full of women.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 01:53 AM
4

I'm starting to think the worst thing men ever did to women and feminists is give them everything they've asked for. Women are unhappier now than ever and feminism is so irrelevant it needs to make up shit left and right just to stay in the picture.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 01:47 AM
6

How the hell did this ridiculous logical fallacy garner so much support and legitimacy? Stupid people who are running out of false statistics and have no ability to form any thoughts, cite any sources or argue in any reasonable fashion. Just, for a moment, let's use another example. Would it be okay for people to call Kayne West, Will Smith or Morgan Freeman a nigger? It's okay guys, they're privileged black men, they don't deserve an opinion, just keep calling them niggers! And then call every …
/r/MensRights18/07/13 01:40 AM
2

Introducing risk and consequences to women in marriages is literally abuse.
/r/MensRights18/07/13 12:52 AM
9

They do. They're saying that powerful men made it a dirty word.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 06:45 PM
6

Not sure about Pakistan, but here's a video of a rapist getting beheaded in Saudi Arabia. And that's not the most pro woman countries out there.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 04:31 PM
37

Technically it's just as valid, just not as useful. I would certainly hire someone who has had advanced mathematical knowledge/experience over someone who could tell me 200 ways they've been oppressed.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 08:00 AM
4

We end up having to deal with ideas from her that porn is inherently evil (although she is all for sexual freedom she says, my SO got in a spat with her over this). I hope she feels the same about anything Disney or you know, shit like sex in the city or devil wears Prada where women do jack shit, yet have these luxurious high paying jobs in some of the most competitive and expensive cities in the world. Oh, you have a multimillion dollar apartment you pay huge taxes on (probably more than what …
/r/MensRights17/07/13 06:42 AM
33

This was a campaign done on some campus where they handed out these white boards and let people write whatever they wanted for "I need feminism" bullshit. It's real. Here's the rest. And some are equally ridiculous.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 06:32 AM
49

It was, before feminism. Irony.
/r/MensRights17/07/13 06:30 AM
17

Christine Lagarde used to find them "offensive." Now the first female director of the International Monetary Fund sees gender quotas as a necessary, albeit temporary, tool to help women reach top jobs. I thought women were better and more intelligent, not to mention accomplished and successful than men? Why the gender quotas? “At the end of the day, people will have to be convinced that [women] bring something to the table,” the former French finance minister told the Dublin-based Irish European…
/r/MensRights16/07/13 07:55 AM
18

Man the fire alarms!
/r/MensRights16/07/13 07:08 AM
2

With an ATM, you have to put money in, first, before you can take it out. Look up the concept of loss leading. I've known a few guys in very prominent majors while in college who met "amazing girls" that were pulling that shit on them (aka paying for themselves, splitting bills, getting free girfts and slowly over time letting the guy pick up more and more until he was paying for everything).
/r/MensRights16/07/13 06:32 AM
4

I would just shit sexism if I was there, "encourage" them to take the sign down if you know what I mean. "Women are like cars, the nicer their curves, the more expensive they get" or maybe "Women are like cars, the good ones have nice curves, low mileage, and are dead silent". Or something along those lines. I'm sure nobody at that place would appreciate it. Maybe give corporate a call and just shit sexism down their throats while "loving" their sexist sign. I'm sure it'll be gone in the morning…
/r/MensRights16/07/13 06:23 AM
14

Nobody's bitching about the women's studies degree itself. We're poking fun at people who get the degree and expect high paying jobs, related to the degree and the people who say "look I went to college", when it's no more difficult than high school. If you want to go to college and learn about something, anything, that's fine. But don't do something as useless as women's studies and expect corporate america to bend over backwards for you. This is where the problem lies, this is what people don'…
/r/MensRights16/07/13 06:16 AM
32

Just gonna leave this here.
/r/MensRights16/07/13 06:09 AM
6

Seems like what they're saying is "we didn't get our cut, so it's invalid".
/r/MensRights16/07/13 05:45 AM
2

It's not over, they're just getting desperate. They do have a lot of control, but the problem lies in the same area where feminists like to point and say "not all feminists are like that, feminism is a broad thing". It's only a matter of time before feminists will be fighting it out with other feminists (it's already getting to be a dirty word, and most women have left the movement). I honestly think it will turn into the next OWS movement, where there's tons of people, all creating this giganti…
/r/MensRights15/07/13 05:26 AM
0

Sounds like these people will have serious issues dealing with the real world.
/r/MensRights14/07/13 04:35 PM
7

All the comments they picked weren't even that bad, and all were downvoted. I was expecting more, but I guess it's all about making headlines and getting page hits.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 05:35 PM
30

She didn't. If you look close, he wasn't holding that woman very well, and when he was distracted she slapped him.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:37 PM
1

Well since you got the name it's easy to look up. Here's a link I found.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:32 PM
-3

A command officer in the Denver Police sex assaults unit recently told me he placed the false rape numbers at approximately 45 percent. Objective studies have confirmed this. See Purdue Professor Kanin's nine-year study published in 1994 concluding that over 40 percent of rape allegations were demonstrably false. Source
/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:22 PM
29

Don't worry, she'll show up 80 pounds heavier.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 03:18 PM
21

Pretty sure it's from the Okcupid study.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:59 PM
21

Oh they do, but only when they're talking about PUA's.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 02:30 PM
8

That cop is fucking kidding right? Remember this video? It happened in Edmonton. And people still have the audacity to be outraged about these posters over there? This kind of crazy shit is happening in their backyard as we speak.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 01:57 PM
4

Tried reading some of the comments in those articles. It's amazing how people try to justify their ideas and beliefs when the same arguments could be applied to the original "don't be that guy" posters. And it's just amazing how people see what they want to see in these posters instead of the actual message.
/r/MensRights11/07/13 01:36 PM
2

Remove urinals, and security cameras?
/r/MensRights11/07/13 12:54 AM
6

Well they wanted to make anti-feminism illegal (not sure where that is right now), but a research center that was getting something like 54 million euros a year was recently shut down because it turns out all the research was nonsense and false. That center is being brought back online now that all the media attention has passed. Prostitution is illegal, only if you're buying. Laws were suggested that men should sit down while they pee. And of course, how men should sit "properly" and in a less …
/r/MensRights11/07/13 12:09 AM
24

More like while the government stands next to him, after having tied his hands behind his back, in order to protect the girl. And if she hurts her foot while kicking him in the balls, it's off to neverland, where the rape and abuse is plentiful and ignored.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 11:39 PM
8

This is what feminism does, this is what feminism says. Until you actually you know, stand up to other feminists, this shit is meaningless and more of the "well the definition of feminism is equality, so quit judging us on our actions" crap.
/r/MensRights10/07/13 11:37 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter