TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ImBloodyAnnoyed Archive

View 1 post and 345 comments by ImBloodyAnnoyed on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
6

ImBloodyAnnoyed/r/MensRights20/11/12 07:16 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Get a recommendation from the lawyer who represented you at the Art 32 hearing. This is good advice.
/r/MensRights15/08/20 03:27 PM
2

> I’m considering filing a defamation of character or libel civil suit against my accuser.... If anyone has any legal resources, or a civil attorney I can have a consult with I ‘d appreciate any suggestions. My accuser and I are both military, and we are now in different states then when this all began. I don’t’ even know what state I’m supposed to file the law suit in. The state the accusation was made, the state I reside, or the state she resides? Couple of things here. Any attorney will need …
/r/MensRights15/08/20 03:25 PM
1

So glad to see this at the top. Liberal here too. There must be at least a dozen among us around here. The political posts are getting... interesting around here to say the least. Yes we have it pretty damn good in the US and no, liberal and RP are not mutually exclusive.
/r/TheRedPill06/10/16 12:04 AM
2

Everyone frames. Agreed. My point exactly. Since I only mentioned leftists, you assumed that I am unaware that others use the technique. No, I said IF you think that only leftists do this, then you are deluded, I did not state that you do think so. Conservatives traditionally hold a frame of the world that truth is absolute. Mmmm... I would put it more in terms of belief in objective goods and natural law, but yeah. Big, big topic though. That means concepts like reframing bother them since it t…
/r/TheRedPill04/10/16 05:35 PM
2

That's all good and well (great post BTW) but if you think that only "leftists" and "progressives" use reframing and conservatives (and marketing execs and lawyers and salespeople...) don't then you're pretty damn deluded.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/16 03:16 PM
1

"Authenticity" is a con, a fiction, or more precisely a marketing technique to sell Veblen goods. The book "the authenticity hoax" is a good way to understand this, and it's pretty funny to boot. I get what OP is talking about but the video Guy's choice of the term "authenticity" -maybe he went for the popular buzzword on purpose?- misses the mark.
/r/TheRedPill01/09/16 12:56 PM
1

Yup
/r/MensRights09/08/16 03:35 AM
5

I came to realize the obviousness of the truth. What is the Matrix? Control. The Matrix is a computer generated dream world, built to keep us under control in order to change a human being into this. [holds up a copper-top D cell battery]
/r/TheRedPill18/07/16 11:21 PM
1

If in doubt, do. I like my maxims simple.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/16 12:48 AM
1

Really? Interesting! What states?
/r/TheRedPill02/07/16 01:46 PM
1

Very possibly. It's up to OP if he wants that headache
/r/TheRedPill01/07/16 01:13 AM
2

Sure if OP wants to make a public statement... Principles are expensive, pragmatism is cost effective
/r/TheRedPill01/07/16 12:46 AM
4

Defamation requires: a false statement that is defamatory (I.e. "Bad") that is published to a third party causing you specifically identifiable damages It looks like you're out of luck for the last one (can you put a dollar value on your damaged reputation? Any contracts you didn't get? Etc) However claiming that someone has a venereal disease in many jurisdictions counts as defamation per se, meaning damages are presumed and need not be proven. The downside is that juries rarely give more than …
/r/TheRedPill30/06/16 11:37 PM
2

You missed one: Lies. Lies from women (and men) about what women want, what they desire and why. Years of being lied to by virtually every woman one ever meets does not help. (Note: in 100% of cases these women don't know that they're lying. Maybe it is better called being severely mislead or misinformed.) Solution : books, Internet
/r/TheRedPill21/06/16 11:03 PM
1

Keep it up. Still waiting for the sales pitch. Guess next is a link to your blog where you explain your grand theory in greater detail.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/16 11:48 PM
2

You could benefit from punctuation. Like they teach in college.
/r/TheRedPill12/06/16 11:32 PM
2

Hey man sorry about your loss
/r/TheRedPill07/06/16 02:16 AM
1

If you’ve paid attention, you’ve noticed that any attempt to regulate illegal immigration is viewed as racism. Now, any reasonable person can see this is insane – it is racist to enforce your own laws? How can that be? How does that make any sense? How can “didn’t obey the law” be a race? How can any person really think that it is? But the word “racist” is to the Social Justice religion as the word “heretical” was to Christianity in the old days. It doesn’t have anything to do with race. It simp…
/r/TheRedPill05/06/16 02:46 PM
1

Brother, With great respect, I honestly think you’re way off. And I say that, as indicated, with respect for you and your post. I’ll stick to logical points only, and hopefully you’ll see my view even if you don’t share it. The bottom line I believe is this: you’re overreaching. There are no coincidences, and no conspiracies either. [Gah. too long for one post. splitting in parts] Alright: Introduction My best history teacher when I was a wee lad once told me a maxim by which you can understand …
/r/TheRedPill05/06/16 02:43 PM
0

Read this before. Pretty sure black moron dragon ripped it off from someone else. The guy is pathetic anyway.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/16 11:07 PM
18

"People frequently overestimate what they can achieve in two months, but equally frequently underestimate what they can achieve in two years." Steven R. Covey
/r/TheRedPill24/05/16 07:24 PM
1

If you're an ADA, your career progression depends on how many convictions you can get. So you won't prosecute white people with money for lawyers as vigorously as black ones without Why the love for black convicts? White people without money get just as bad a fucking as black ones do. All whites aren't wealthy industrialists who get pats on the back from cigar chomping power brokers. No particular love. And you're right. ADAs go for the low-hanging fruit, i.e. poor people. Which in many cases ar…
/r/TheRedPill08/05/16 02:02 PM
0

It's a self-sustaining issue on both sides. Agree.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/16 09:33 PM
1

Quotas alone? Definitely not. Single parenthood, attitude, personal responsibility all go into it and then some. I never disagreed with OP. I'm just saying there's more than one cause at work here.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/16 09:32 PM
1

Except that if you're a judge, only people already arrested come before you. If one group gets arrested more, it's either because they commit more crimes or it's because the police arrest them more than other groups (maybe because that group has less money to spend on lawyers) or both. For instance, white and black people consume about the same amount of drugs, but black people get arrested far more frequently. Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2013/06/04/the-blackwhite-marijua…
/r/TheRedPill06/05/16 07:42 PM
0

http://m.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/cops-suing-nypd-police-quotas-arrests-article-1.2549579 Dude I'm with you on personal responsibility. But let's be realistic. The biggest statical determinant of whether you'll do some crime is your environment. That does not excuse personal behavior but it shows that the issue is more complex. If you're an ADA, your career progression depends on how many convictions you can get. So you won't prosecute white people with money for lawyers as vigorously …
/r/TheRedPill06/05/16 07:34 PM
4

True though the mother has to have the wisdom to let that happen. From some interactions between friends and their families, some mothers of 30+ year olds just won't stop "mothering" them. Which makes it difficult and frustrating.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/16 11:46 AM
3

That's definitely a big reason but let's not ignore the completely screwy justice and court system, the prison business, arrest quotas, etc.
/r/TheRedPill06/05/16 11:43 AM
2

OP got it wrong. see my response to his reply to my post.
/r/TheRedPill05/05/16 01:19 PM
2

It's not for life. The sponsor’s responsibility lasts until the immigrant becomes a U.S. citizen, has earned 40 work quarters credited toward Social Security (a work quarter is about three months, so this means about ten years of work), dies, or permanently leaves the United States. If the immigrant has already been living in the U.S. and earned work credits before applying for the green card, those count toward the 40. In fact, in marriage-based cases, work done by the U.S. petitioning spouse d…
/r/TheRedPill05/05/16 01:18 PM
5

You got a source for that "law"? I know my way around immigration rules and never heard of it
/r/TheRedPill04/05/16 10:27 PM
5

Meh. My mother once told me that when my brother and I were young out of curiosity she gave us some dolls to play with in addition to the blocks and trucks and Legos. Apparently we both ignored the dolls and just played with our Legos and trucks. Boys will, in fact, be boys.
/r/TheRedPill14/04/16 11:31 PM
15

Extreme emotional distress/disturbance. In some states it's an affirmative defense that brings the charge down from murder to manslaughter.
/r/TheRedPill09/01/16 11:20 PM
2

figuring out how much your coworkers make A number of companies in the US have policies against discussing salaries. These policies can be written or informal. They are also illegal and unenforceable. Under the Labor Relations Act of 1935 discussing salaries cannot be banned. Again of course don't piss off management on purpose with this, but also keep it in mind
/r/TheRedPill26/10/15 03:39 PM
17

RP liberals unite! There must be literally handfuls of us here.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/15 11:54 PM
1

Nah, long-standing English roots. Might just be one of those universal jokes.
/r/TheRedPill02/10/15 12:51 AM
3

I have a friend who is jewish. He told me once that his dad told him: "If you're wondering what to do in a situation, ask a gentile and then do the opposite" So it might not be unique to Russians. Or he made it up. He's a funny SOB that way.
/r/TheRedPill01/10/15 09:16 PM
0

“Are you gaaay or something?!” [Look her up and down] "Well, I am now"
/r/TheRedPill25/08/15 09:49 PM
1

Yup. Alternatively live somewhere close to a transit hub. If you are close to grand central, choosing a bar there is perfect - easy logistics for her to get there, easy for you to isolate.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 08:15 PM
1

I lived in both places. OP is 100% spot on. Also someone post that "women of LA" video it's hilarious.
/r/TheRedPill10/08/15 08:02 PM
0

Well this is obviously jurisdiction-specific, but: "If you were acting in self defense, no crime was committed." It doesn't quite work that way AFAIK. Self-defense is a defense. You raise a defense only after the government has accused you of a crime and provided evidence to a jury to meet its burden of proof (beyond a reasonable doubt). Only thereafter do you put on your defense, be it self-defense, alibi, mistaken person, insanity, whatever, call witnesses and experts and whatnot to prove your…
/r/TheRedPill13/05/15 09:08 PM
1

Don't you have to prove self defense on a preponderance of the evidence before the persecutor has to rebut it beyond a reasonable doubt?
/r/TheRedPill13/05/15 12:40 PM
7

You just repeated what that dude said.
/r/MensRights03/05/15 07:53 PM
1

Read this: http://www.harrybrowne.org/articles/GiftDaughter.htm The idea that the world owes you jack shit extends beyond women.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/15 10:05 PM
17

Seen John Wick? He avenged his freaking dog.
/r/TheRedPill28/04/15 03:24 AM
2

This is a 2-minute video you should watch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r_2kelqYz_o&noredirect=1 Say what you like about stephen fry, he's a smart man.
/r/TheRedPill07/04/15 07:28 PM
1

Don't force things. In Taoism this is (very vaguely) known as Wei-wu. Complex to grasp but useful.
/r/TheRedPill26/03/15 05:30 PM
11

Wanna hear something funny? I never ask about my gf's past. Never. When she brings it up, I change topics. She's literally begging to tell me her past now and every now and then does so to see if there's a reaction. There isn't. The information is noted and processed, but to her it's like I'm not even listening. Drives her wild. Told me way more this way than she ever would have if I had asked.
/r/TheRedPill26/03/15 04:11 PM
1

Yeah except.... I've heard that the male pill is "just around the corner" dozens of times over the last decade or so. Sounds great, I'll believe it when I can swallow it.
/r/TheRedPill23/03/15 07:31 PM
1

do whatever she wants as long as she's making the intelligent choice Do what you want, as long as it's what I want you to do. You can have this car in any colour, as long as it's black.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/15 11:19 PM
2

I remember that moment in college when I realized that I had become the guy I used to hate. It felt good.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/15 06:09 AM
10

Word. She's not complaining but being proactive about finding a solution.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/15 06:11 AM
6

I respect your position. That said it's my experience that willpower is a limited resource, like attention, that I rather spend on other things. To each their own.
/r/TheRedPill09/02/15 07:20 AM
5

Author? Amazon has three books with that title by different people
/r/TheRedPill09/02/15 07:12 AM
1

Agreed and I'd love to but shit I barely have time to lift.
/r/TheRedPill02/02/15 06:16 AM
-9

Don't say that Clinton thing too loud, people around this sub love to hate on liberals for no reason.
/r/TheRedPill18/01/15 01:42 AM
1

First off- morality: happiness is a personal responsibility. It's not up to me to make you happy. I might do it or I might not, but it's not my responsibility. Here are some pragmatic arguments against plating an ex: An ex might try to rope you into a baby trap by using your history and past trust to convince you to raw dog her. I keep saying this. Get a vasectomy. Get one yesterday. I do not understand people who don't. Freeze your sperm if you want kids later. You might start to rekindle old f…
/r/TheRedPill09/01/15 02:03 AM
1

Just... Remember the first two rules of fight club, okay?
/r/TheRedPill01/01/15 03:45 AM
7

I've said it before, I'll say it again. Open relationships are OK if you're the one pushing for it. They aren't if she is.
/r/TheRedPill01/01/15 03:41 AM
3

I met her too! Nice lady, got me to the airport in no time.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 01:18 AM
3

Steve should have gotten a vasectomy and a prenup. Problems solved in advance.
/r/TheRedPill27/12/14 06:27 PM
2

Well yeah. Mike Ross was always the link to the audience, the person your average Joe could relate to ("if only he had an eidetic memory too") and was as such necessary. Actually a useful counterweight. I watched most of season two with the merger and the split. It's suddenly just drama for drama's sake and I'm not a fan of soap operas. Let me know when Harvey starts his own firm and I might start watching again...
/r/TheRedPill22/12/14 10:15 PM
2

I've said it above in this thread... I stopped watching suits after the second season, when Harvey starts showing his pussy side. Being emotional, remorseful, etc. I mean he was just awesome at the start.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/14 08:10 PM
1

The first two seasons. He's awesome, kicks ass and only cares about getting shit done. After that... He has an emotional side, shows feelings to women, "is not ok" with his secretary screwing someone. Ugh. Awesome character gone wrong.
/r/TheRedPill22/12/14 08:09 PM
17

I really don't have anything to say on this discussion except... The relevancy of your username is fucking freaky.
/r/TheRedPill08/12/14 08:25 AM
14

It's like being an entrepreneur. You can't make $5000/month from your startup without going through the phase of making $50/month.
/r/TheRedPill07/12/14 07:37 PM
1

To each their own, but I rather work an extra hour or two and then pay someone to clean my place.
/r/TheRedPill07/12/14 01:30 AM
2

"Reality is my drug" fifty cent
/r/TheRedPill04/12/14 03:32 PM
0

Let me put it this way. Could this story be made up or at least embellished? Sure. No way to know for certain on the Internet. But I also know that life is stranger than fiction and that weird shit does happen. If you hear a story and people say "you can't make that up!" Then theres usually a reason for that. Was it her birthday really? Did the dude hook up with the sister? Maybe not. But that's really not the point of the story either, is it?
/r/TheRedPill02/12/14 03:20 PM
1

Eh, no. Most of them are out of shape, have zero manners or game. They just have tons of money.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/14 07:32 AM
7

I worked in the Arabian gulf. This shit (about the prince) is spot on. The Saudi the royal family has dozens of princes like that. They're known for it.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/14 07:28 AM
11

Oh come on. NPR has loads of interesting, useful and even funny stuff that is mostly neither BP or RP but just, well, interesting.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/14 06:28 AM
3

Yup. I have ONE female friend like that. Known her for over ten years, good stuff. No romance just someone to shoot the shit with and help strategizing. Great wing woman. Everyone who knows us thinks that we are or should be dating. I know no one else in person who has a similar friendship with a girl. Everyone else has female friends like OP described - orbiters or plates.
/r/TheRedPill29/11/14 06:21 AM
3

Reading gracian I often feel like Greene just ripped him off. Or used him for inspiration.
/r/TheRedPill26/11/14 04:54 PM
0

The term sigma is an invention of failed bloggers. There's alpha and beta. The end.
/r/TheRedPill25/11/14 06:41 AM
2

You may also get paid for winning.
/r/TheRedPill24/11/14 05:49 AM
1

So have I and I agree. There's a reason I'm here now. Aaaaaand the fact that my accent is very helpful in these parts :D
/r/TheRedPill21/11/14 08:15 PM
1

Yup. The old British comedies are the best.
/r/TheRedPill21/11/14 07:30 AM
4

Don't. It's an environment funded by men for the benefit of women. Simply not an advantageous environment. Unless you just enjoy clubs, in which case, just have fun.
/r/TheRedPill20/11/14 05:04 PM
12

"Won't haggle?!?!?" Monty Python's the life of Brian
/r/TheRedPill20/11/14 04:52 PM
1

Yeah both the woman and the lawyers have incentives to keep the system going. They won't stop it. A runaway judge, but judicial opinion would have to back him up or he gets overturned quick. And that won't happen. So the legislature is your best bet.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/14 03:06 PM
6

Not the lawyers. They are paid to act in the best interest of the client. It's their sworn duty. It would be malpractice not to gun for the most they can get out of the process. That's what you'd want your lawyer to do. The process is broken of course. Complain to the legislature.
/r/TheRedPill16/11/14 09:02 AM
11

Criminal defense represent. And you're bang on the money.
/r/TheRedPill03/11/14 02:02 PM
2

This is the book I thought of when I read your title. Highly recommend. Also expertly explains meta model and Milton model and submodalities and other useful stuff.
/r/TheRedPill18/10/14 02:59 AM
1

Yup, amusement is an emotion indeed.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/14 05:17 PM
1

Bwahaha. LMFAO. Bro, do you even Internet? Feel free to report me to the TRP police for use of an initialism that you disapprove of. I'm sure they'll care. LOL. Also some advice in return. 1. Throwing around terms like "preconceptions" and "fallacies" doesn't make you sound smart, especially if in conjunction with unbased ad hominem. 2. If you want to challenge people's preconceptions, try using logic and evidence rather than just invective. It's what adults do.
/r/TheRedPill14/10/14 03:36 PM
2

Look up black dragon The guy is in marketing and sales, I.e. He's a certified liar. Look up his posting history, he's a loser and a sellout who's failed pretty much across his entire life and now at something like fifty years old makes a living pushing PDFs for sale on virgins over the Internet in which he rehashes stuff that's well known in the community. Just ignore the dude.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 03:07 PM
6

This is it. It's not that boys were different. They were being lied to. All hail the quality post bot!
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 02:37 PM
1

Wow I really must have hit a nerve to make you this emotional. It's seriously amusing how you confuse frothing ad hominem with "challenging preconceptions"... LOL
/r/TheRedPill12/10/14 03:02 AM
1

Ah yes how to bullshit on the Internet. Make unfounded claim. When asked for sources, claim that other people are the problem and that everyone else "just needs to see the truth" - trying desperately to shift the burden of proof away from yourself. Become a public laughing stock.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/14 03:32 PM
0

Got any sources for those claims?
/r/TheRedPill09/10/14 10:03 PM
1

Noice. I was waiting for that reference in this thread
/r/TheRedPill09/10/14 03:26 AM
1

Indeed. The Amish use this to get rid of disruptive people in a pacifist way. It's called shunning and is very effective. Imagine no one invites you, or accepts your presents or everyone returns your thank you cards... It makes you want to leave.
/r/TheRedPill04/10/14 03:17 PM
5

Very interesting! I froze some of my sperm when I turned thirty because I guessed this might be the case, so thank you.
/r/TheRedPill17/09/14 10:44 PM
6

That's a pretty great way of phrasing it.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/14 11:41 PM
1

Hmmmm. I used to be deep and thoughtful and cared ably causes and was into all that stuff. Then I became shallow. It's more fun.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/14 10:00 PM
0

Oh good. This way you pay capital gains tax and then the exit tax too. Death and taxes dude. There is no winning move here.
/r/TheRedPill31/08/14 09:26 PM
0

No it's because the IRS wants money
/r/TheRedPill31/08/14 09:25 PM
4

Yeap. When you leave there is an exit tax. All of your property is suddenly income and is taxed as such.
/r/TheRedPill30/08/14 03:22 PM
30

Word. Attorney here. Pre-law is a waste of time. Also, if you own two businesses at 29... why law school? You wouldn't be practicing as an attorney whilst doing your other business because ethics rules and because the first 5-10 years of being a lawyer is learning how to lawyer, which he seems to be missing out on as he's not employed... I could go on. So I say he's full of BS.
/r/TheRedPill23/08/14 04:52 PM
4

Assistant district attorney. A prosecutor.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/14 12:23 AM
16

Lawyer here. In criminal defense "true believer" is known term for a certain type of ADA.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/14 07:11 PM
1

INTJ here. Check out r/INTJ sometime. Also, great post. Really happy for you. It's amazing what men can achieve when they purposefully and conscientiously work on themselves and throw out most of society's BS.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 02:23 PM
3

Almost lost a brother to a motorcycling accident. Do what makes you happy but for the love of god please wear a helmet, armor and ride safe.
/r/TheRedPill03/08/14 03:32 PM
1

I second that. Credit rating FTW. Also, rewards points/miles.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 03:30 PM
3

Well they don't repair anything, but you're right, any potential damage is minimized, not compounded
/r/TheRedPill24/07/14 02:59 PM
6

It's an article in the daily fail. That alone is reason to be cautious...
/r/TheRedPill11/07/14 06:17 PM
1

Online game works wonders for me, but to each their own. Ymmv.
/r/TheRedPill11/07/14 06:14 PM
1

Hey. Sorry been away from reddit for a while, had work to do. Ya know, work? That's what us liberals do. We pay taxes rather than complain on faux news about immigrants taking work. (I'm joking here actually. I know many conservatives who work hard, and so do you probably. I'm just beyond annoyed with the right wing ideology that gets spun around here sometimes. RP is not conservative or right wing (or for that matter liberal or left wing)) Anyhow, regarding your three paragraphs: "War on women!…
/r/TheRedPill11/07/14 02:10 AM
-2

I know. It's on level with that's a simple fact.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 02:44 PM
-2

Left wing democrat here. You're wrong.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 04:58 AM
0

Good article, except: think long and hard before you marry a woman of another race and father half-breed children. wut What is this, house Sytherin?
/r/TheRedPill29/06/14 04:46 AM
2

OMG that is hilarious... and true.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/14 10:56 PM
5

Brother, are you me? I came to exactly the same conclusions after living there and consulting with the 2010 census data. I didn't want to be quite as outspoken to OP though. Also the CA weather does nothing for me. I don't worship the sun... This map shows clearly what it's like: http://www.creativeclass.com/_v3/whos_your_city/maps/FIG_13.1_The_Singles_Map.gif Also check this out and move the sliders to 30+ age.... it's enlightening. http://jonathansoma.com/singles/#7/10/2/0
/r/TheRedPill28/06/14 10:55 PM
7

Odd. I had the opposite experience in LA but I'm killing it in NY. different approaches I guess.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/14 01:19 AM
1

They didn't pass that law, it's a bill, and probably won't get passed.
/r/TheRedPill28/06/14 12:52 AM
1

No. At least not in NY. It's illegal.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/14 01:00 PM
2

That's not 100% correct. There was an AMA by this moron faux day a while back. He's not only an anti-vaccine blogger but also (among many other idiotic things) pro-segregation. I called him out on some of that stuff and got voted into oblivion. That said, that was probably a year ago and the only such incident that comes to mind.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/14 12:54 AM
10

Yep. Just couldn't help myself being a smartass ;D
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 04:38 AM
8

900 is an even number...
/r/TheRedPill04/06/14 04:35 AM
1

That makes sense I guess. Cool
/r/TheRedPill28/05/14 04:12 AM
1

Not that it's a problem or anything, but what has being bi to do with that?
/r/TheRedPill28/05/14 04:05 AM
-3

Yes absolutely. That is what I meant to point out / make more obvious.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/14 04:25 AM
-7

64% of US women overweight or obese (closer to 2/3 than half) of these 36% are obese of these 8% are extremely obese FTFY. Sorry I just cannot help myself when percentages add up to 108% - my innner OCD self comes out.
/r/TheRedPill26/05/14 03:27 AM
2

Hell hath no fury...
/r/TheRedPill23/05/14 06:13 PM
3

Yup. I was about to accuse you of historical revisionism (card-carrying democrat here) but yeah it's a story for another day and essentially off topic. And both parties are far from perfect. And your original analysis about caring is spot on.
/r/TheRedPill17/05/14 12:35 AM
1

Same here. I don't want children because I don't want children. Women, society, feminism etc have nothing to do with that decision.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/14 05:32 PM
0

Yup. There's nothing quite as BP as religion
/r/TheRedPill13/05/14 05:15 AM
1

Nice reference!
/r/TheRedPill08/05/14 03:09 PM
1

This guy knows
/r/TheRedPill08/05/14 03:07 PM
5

Are you kidding me? This crowd is very pro-con and pro-religion to mention just a few to the point that I often have to check whether I'm not in r/teaparty or r/rightwing or something.
/r/TheRedPill25/04/14 02:10 PM
13

"I know it is the fashion to say that most of recorded history is lies anyway. I am willing to believe that history is for the most part inaccurate and biased, but what is peculiar to our own age is the abandonment of the idea that history could be truthfully written. In the past people deliberately lied, or they unconsciously coloured what they wrote, or they struggled after the truth, well knowing that they must make many mistakes; but in each case they believed that ‘facts’ existed and were m…
/r/TheRedPill24/04/14 02:31 PM
35

Lawyer here. Non-family attorney. Accept the fact that you are at the mercy of a judge. Yes. Unless you have ungodly good lawyers who can make the record for a successful appeal (unlikely and ruinously expensive), it's mostly true. Document everything. I mean EVERYTHING. A million times this. Not just in family court, EVERYWHERE, EVERYTHING that might turn into a legal issue. Hell, documenting stuff can avoid a legal battle. In civil court, documentation is 9/10th of the law. Write down everythi…
/r/TheRedPill18/04/14 07:17 PM
3

Eh, not much there. As said, got screwed over by his divorcee. Even though he's ivy-league smart, he can't get his head around game and RP reality. I tried to explain things to him once or twice, with the result that he got angry and then told the women I date that they deserve better. I don't try so hard anymore.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/14 01:12 AM
9

Almost the exact same here, except my brother already got divorced and still insists that his beta approach to women is the only correct one...
/r/TheRedPill15/04/14 08:33 PM
3

Wanted to say this. All of his books are pure gold. Read and re-read them frequently.
/r/TheRedPill08/04/14 03:15 PM
1

Probably this. Chances are the arrangement is reciprocal
/r/TheRedPill31/03/14 09:26 PM
1

NYC... Hello there :)
/r/TheRedPill31/03/14 09:19 PM
3

Yeah no. I have a brother like that too. When I show and don't tell he is jealous and moralistic, calling me juvenile and misogynistic. To the point where he tells my gfs that they deserve better. I've tried telling and showing. There's no helping some people.
/r/TheRedPill31/03/14 09:08 PM
4

Two years? God, the poor guy
/r/TheRedPill12/03/14 04:03 PM
1

Weakness in a man is not attractive. It's not fair; I didn't make the rules.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 04:40 AM
4

SAS motto
/r/TheRedPill21/01/14 06:05 AM
1

Rsd... Ugh. Their webshite is like a cult.
/r/TheRedPill10/01/14 05:30 PM
9

Scalia does that too.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 06:41 PM
0

Eh. AFAIK trash talk is part of boxing.
/r/TheRedPill10/11/13 07:12 AM
2

You're everything DeBeers hates.
/r/TheRedPill09/10/13 03:06 AM
10

People have been procreating way before the invention of marriage.
/r/TheRedPill24/09/13 02:23 AM
5

My thoughts exactly. "So you just discovered the worlds newest profession...?"
/r/TheRedPill22/09/13 05:26 AM
17

I don't disagree - but THAT trait is hardly unique to feminists.
/r/MensRights16/09/13 04:15 AM
1

Yawn. Really? FOX also lies FYI. As do many others.
/r/MensRights11/09/13 01:06 PM
2

Oh, they're not unbiased. No news agency is. You got to balance your sources and listen to many agencies. I won't go to AJ to get the latest news on Qatar. But just compare what you can learn about, say, in a day about the kardashians on US news vs on AJ or BBC. The difference is striking.
/r/MensRights07/09/13 05:38 AM
2

Why? When it comes to news, especially international news, AJ is waaaay ahead and more professional than CNN, FOX or any US-news agency. Except for NPR maybe. Also BBC world is excellent. Mainstream US news is good really only for celebrity news I'm afraid...
/r/MensRights07/09/13 05:18 AM
-1

Yes actually. Many of them are the most driven, smart, go-getting people I know (totally undatable of course). Most men... aren't. I almost have no guyfriends.
/r/TheRedPill20/08/13 01:17 AM
1

JLH?
/r/seduction11/08/13 03:02 PM
0

Stop linking to omega game already. It's a loser site.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/13 03:24 AM
1

Dworkin? For a moment I thought you were talking about the great and venerable Ronald Dworkin that favourite legal philosopher of mine. Phew!
/r/MensRights06/08/13 02:33 AM
6

Think like a man of action. Act like a man of thought.
/r/TheRedPill31/07/13 05:22 AM
6

Good guy judge gives case to another non-affiliated judge. I approve.
/r/TheRedPill27/07/13 06:12 PM
19

A terrible new age adagio says something like "if you follow your feelings, you are doing the right thing" You have Rousseau to thank for that one.
/r/TheRedPill18/07/13 11:06 PM
4

Yes yes I know. I too can use urbandictionary. However I find the notion of the BBC making porn hilarious. Think the Monty Python crew directing porn. Oh, it would be gloriously ridiculous.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/13 03:56 AM
5

BBC The British Broadcasting Corporation produces porn now?
/r/TheRedPill13/07/13 03:50 AM
2

Isn't the individual equipped with powerful, nonrational biological drives? ANY RAND: He is not. A man is equipped with a certain kind of physical mechanism and certain needs, but without any knowledge of how to fulfill them. For instance, man needs food. He experiences hunger. But, unless he learns first to identify this hunger, then to know that he needs food and how to obtain it, he will starve. The need, the hunger, will not tell him how to satisfy it. Man is born with certain physical and p…
/r/TheRedPill28/06/13 04:07 AM
1

I don't speak out. It stops me from getting laid. Sad but true.
/r/MensRights28/06/13 03:11 AM
2

ditto
/r/TheRedPill24/06/13 06:07 PM
1

Liked the guy, never liked his writing style for some reason.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/13 07:34 PM
1

Two. Oddly, both are women. Men... gee, it's hard to get reality through. But if you find a very intelligent and ambitious woman (rare) and explain RP... goldmine of a wingwoman.
/r/TheRedPill18/06/13 01:09 AM
2

Eh. She gets called out and downvoted, even before we got there.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/13 12:39 AM
2

Rational thinking person not all that impressed with ad hominem terms.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/13 03:37 AM
15

Let's not forget the accent bonus. It's like a +5 charm on any seduction roll here.
/r/TheRedPill16/05/13 04:51 PM
-1

Fellas, fellas... OP is already getting ripped to shreds in the OP comments. This is not so much RP stuff as it is simply OP being a fag.
/r/TheRedPill02/05/13 07:20 PM
3

The plea bargain system Agreed. However, rationally speaking, it would be impossible to offer every one accused person who pleads not guilty a jury trial. The court resources are simply not there. If the courts are at full capacity (many places over) and 95% of cases plea bargain, then you can imagine the problems. I don't excuse it, but it is difficult to find a better solution.
/r/MensRights25/04/13 02:19 PM
2

yep
/r/TheRedPill23/04/13 01:25 PM
6

It doesn't factor in to our attraction to them Annoyingly they think it does though. I keep having to explain that to my female friends.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/13 01:18 PM
7

Catholics are ...pill. No birth control heehee.... Seriously, liberal/moderate atheist here. the anti-liberal pro-christian tones in the manosphere is friggin real and annoying.
/r/TheRedPill23/04/13 01:16 PM
1

The below is copied from a post over at /r/law: I stopped practicing family law for a number of reasons, but foremost amongst them was the seemingly unending barrage of bullshit arguments and motions from unprepared attorneys that devoted themselves only to driving up the bills. In almost every case I handled, the other party would go through multiple lawyers who each would churn a bill and then duck out once the money dried up. It is fucking despicable and those attorneys should be disbarred. I…
/r/MensRights19/04/13 06:33 PM
3

I was about to say the same thing. I'm reasonably certain she's a virgin This would be a red flag for me. But then different strokes for different folks.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/13 04:37 PM
0

Something I find odd. I think sigma is a term developed by certain bloggers to inflate their own egos. It's essentially just a laid back, lazy alpha.
/r/TheRedPill18/04/13 04:33 PM
2

As an atheist, I actually think the religion analogy makes sense, because.... All religions have inherent illogical inconsistencies and contradictions. And that's okay because they don't have to make sense or rely on evidence. That's what faith is for. And that's what feminists do. They rely on dogma based on faith, not rationality.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 04:28 PM
0

FWIW, I thought your response was excellent.
/r/MensRights18/04/13 04:23 PM
12

LAWYER. UP.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 03:11 PM
2

Looking forward to it, it is. Looking back on it, it isn't.
/r/TheRedPill16/04/13 05:50 PM
3

Fucking this. If she gets lucky with you: "My god, he's sooo confident..." If you don't find her appealing: "He's an arrogant ass" Same with creepy / cocky: She sleeps with you - "Man, your no-BS approach is just so refreshing" She does not sleep with you - "He was a creep anyway"
/r/TheRedPill16/04/13 05:48 PM
0

I wish life didn't work this way. I wish I could just love, be myself and not game, put women first, and be rewarded for being a loving person. But I've tried that. Word
/r/TheRedPill15/04/13 06:00 PM
22

THIS. Record and write down everything. Look up on whether your state is a singe or dual consent state when it comes to recording conversations, phone calls. Carry a small dictaphone with you.
/r/MensRights15/04/13 02:53 PM
2

Police are not required to stop questioning you just because you ask for a lawyer. In NY they are.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 02:24 PM
2

Yup. A friend of mine has the "Focus on your own damn family" bumper sticker.
/r/MensRights11/04/13 06:04 PM
1

Okay. Now, just for the sake of argument, imagine all that, except that you had no emotion towards your parents. As if they were different people. Not hate, not like, just... meh. Or imagine, for example, that one of your parents re-married and you now had a step-parent who well, just makes you feel meh. You have no desire to kill or harm him (hate) or get him anything for xmas (like). Would that mean you're a hateful person?
/r/MensRights06/04/13 03:54 PM
1

This whole thread is about his twitter comments.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 03:44 PM
1

But kids usually are pretty cool if you spend time with them and treat them like people rather than babies. Yeah, well... meh. Maybe.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 03:43 PM
2

Naturally anyone who disagrees with someone who is pro-MRA on anything, even if it is not MRA-related, is a white knight. Let's disregard logic and meritorious arguments and jump straight to the ad hominem labels. That will make people finally take you serious.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 03:42 PM
1

Its oozing through your comments that you are. such as? Do you like cats? I really do. Unfortunately I'm also slightly allergic to them :( I might get a cat sometime and just pop the antihistamines. Don't really have the best opportunity now - small apartment, big city, long hours job.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 03:40 PM
2

let's not put "don't like" in the same league as "hate" Yes. I don't want anything to do with them, but I don't sit up all hours of the night fuming about how shitty they are and how much they piss me off. Same as brussel sprouts, keep them away from me and everything will be awesome. Is it reasonable to hate me because of this? Same exactly. It's odd how people equate the two.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 03:32 PM
1

Maybe there's a semantic thing here. You may be awkward around them, you might not want to spend time around them cuz they can get on your nerves and be stressful, you may not want any of your own How is that different from actively dislike ? To me, that's a distinction without a difference.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 03:30 PM
2

Or, just maybe, he is correct about somethings and wrong about others. Radical thought, I know.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 01:53 AM
5

Thanks. You've put it very eloquently. And honestly, I wish you all the happiness in the world with your child.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 01:52 AM
2

it's an extremely popular opinion So is feminism. What's your point?
/r/MensRights06/04/13 12:22 AM
2

"it's a sign of sociopathy" Let's look that one up. Sociopath: "A person with an antisocial personality disorder"... "Antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) is ... characterized by "... a pervasive pattern of disregard for, and violation of, the rights of others" Nope. This is not about others' rights. It's about my right to like and dislike what I want without being ostracised for it. Frankly, I don't think it's me who is exhibiting hateful behaviour here. I don't need up votes from self-loathi…
/r/MensRights06/04/13 12:19 AM
5

Logically I cannot answer that question until I've met every child. But so far, I haven't. That said... have kids all you want! Be happy with them! I don't care... like at all.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 12:13 AM
9

He said "if you don't like" Not "if you're being annoying about it" Not "if you're being a bitch about it" Not "if you don't care for them" Maybe you met some people who were assholes and did not like children. That's hardly a statistic and does not prove causality.
/r/MensRights06/04/13 12:05 AM
0

I agreed until he posted this: http://i.imgur.com/aZr07ag.png Fuck you Mr. Rogan. Just because I don't like children I'm not "a hateful twat"
/r/MensRights05/04/13 09:29 PM
8

How is it evil? She is predisposed to be attracted to alphas. It's your house. Not hers.
/r/TheRedPill05/04/13 03:08 PM
0

No it does not. Look up the law for yourself. Second degree murder is not light charge. It's very serious. If the DA had charged her with FDM the judge would have given them a swift kick in the ass.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 11:13 PM
5

First degree murder is reserved for some very specific murder offences with closed list of aggravating features, including: murder of a policeman, judge, DA or other law/justice official, murder on contract, terrorism murder, murder for witness intimidation, mass murder, etc. FDM is essentially reserved for the most heinous murders which society has a special stake in. For a 'simple' murder of an 'ordinary' citizen (if such a thing exists), MSD is the heaviest charge the justice system can bring…
/r/MensRights04/04/13 08:22 PM
-5

Sorry to be anal, but no. First degree murder is reserved for some very specific murder offences with closed list of aggravating features, including: murder of a policeman or judge or DA, murder on contract, terrorism, murder for witness intimidation, mass murder, etc. FDM is essentially reserved for the most heinous murders which society has a special stake in. For a 'simple' murder of one person (if such a thing exists), MSD is the heaviest charge the justice system can bring against her. *edi…
/r/MensRights04/04/13 08:20 PM
-1

Youtube? Really? That's where you look for a measured debate?
/r/MensRights03/04/13 03:06 PM
2

Read. Implement what you have learned. Watch the results unfold. Pick the ones you desire. Repeat. That is all there is to it.
/r/TheRedPill02/04/13 05:18 PM
1

Also, let her know in no uncertain terms that You two will not be an item. You will not raise the kid. She will not see you. You will pay child support as the law requires (for otherwise you go to prison) You will hire an excellent lawyer to keep said child support to an absolute minimum and will ward off any advances on your life aggressively with the aid of said lawyer. You will demand a paternity test prior to any payments whatsoever. Get that statement in writing and notarized. Stop seeing h…
/r/MensRights02/04/13 03:44 PM
5

wat *edit: apparently this is a thing. I had no idea.
/r/MensRights01/04/13 08:54 PM
8

Ya know, it's funny. I hang out with quite a few RP / PUA types. The best of them go from STR to STR, laughing all the way to the bank. Short term relationships after one another or overlapping, but never lasting. These are quite alpha dudes. Every now and then, one gets monogamous, and has a "keeper". Predictably, a few months/years later he is frustrated and/ or beta'd and gets the hell out. And then online on the manosphere, plenty of dudes pride themselves with stuff like saying: "MY gf is a…
/r/TheRedPill29/03/13 01:38 PM
15

4 year relationship? Check 4 year itch? Check Relationships don't last, people.
/r/TheRedPill29/03/13 12:46 PM
26

Better: go to a place for breakfast. make sure it has CCTV make sure you know the staff get some PDA pay with card to leave a paper trail
/r/TheRedPill27/03/13 01:01 PM
-1

maybe you should first look at the evidence/ knowledge available No. You made the claim, therefore you have the burden of proof.
/r/TheRedPill27/03/13 12:48 PM
2

homosexuality is due to a brain abnormality. i can get you specifics if you want Go on. Back up your claim with evidence. Also, false equivalence. Even if you are right abnormal =/= bad or defective. Above normal (i.e. abnormal) Intelligence is also different from the majority.
/r/TheRedPill27/03/13 12:48 PM
0

The whole "authenticity" movement is BS
/r/TheRedPill26/03/13 02:43 PM
6

So what's life like as a dentist? Also, don't you miss Rachel at least sometimes?
/r/TheRedPill25/03/13 05:54 PM
2

Anubis.
/r/TheRedPill25/03/13 01:53 PM
2

Except that the only reason that one needs a lawyer is other lawyers. Well, bullshit. There are other reasons, such as asshat law enforcement officials and prosecutors who think they are above the law. Those are a big reason we exist. Also, talking civil law and being sued by others... You don't ever get sued by a lawyer. You get sued by his client and his lawyer is his agent in doing so. If you don't like the laws they are using to do that, complain to the legislature - talk to congress or run …
/r/TheRedPill22/03/13 01:29 PM
1

I prefer to see myself more like a Romo Lampkin...
/r/TheRedPill22/03/13 01:26 PM
4

To be frank: you can stand up for men's rights in your class you can have a good grade in your class Choose one. Sorry.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 05:41 PM
0

Am I crazy here? Nah, Girls is actually a very well-written show and I enjoy watching it as well.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 01:28 PM
8

Stay as far away from lawyers as possible We're people too, ya know? ;)
/r/TheRedPill20/03/13 12:47 PM
7

Having dated "a successful lawyer" you're spot on the money. With one or two comments: Women have a need for emotional drama (which is why they watch soaps, etc). This one can get her fill at work - law can be exhausting and engaging. If hypergamy is what you are worried about, this kind does not have the time to play the market and likely her colleagues are blue-pill betas. Money. She has her own (or rather has positive cashflow despite horrendous law school debts) and does not badger you that …
/r/TheRedPill20/03/13 12:47 PM
6

Lawyers suck, male or female. Hey now. It's only 99% of us that give the rest a bad name. Also, the day you really need one, and find a good one, you'll love lawyers.
/r/TheRedPill20/03/13 12:42 PM
1

men basically only work then come home and do nothing, and women do a majority of the actual work wat
/r/MensRights19/03/13 02:22 PM
2

Came here to say this. Glad it's the top comment. Given how bad women have it, by and large, in India, it's hardly surprising that there is a movement to swing the pendulum waaaay over to the other side. And realistically, placing it in the middle (actual equality) would at this stage probably not solve the problem.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 02:12 PM
1

Alpha and beta females don't exist in terms of inter-gender attraction in the same way that alpha males are more attractive, no. However women differ in terms of success they have, which is an alpha/beta spectrum. It just has no bearing on attraction.
/r/TheRedPill18/03/13 06:07 PM
2

four days before their lavish 1998 wedding That's why you get it signed six months in advance.
/r/MensRights12/03/13 01:46 PM
2

I donated to prostate cancer research on my tax return.
/r/MensRights11/03/13 01:13 PM
2

I have some thoughts on this, but... Do we have a concise, agreed-upon definition of hypergamy? It's kinda required for discourse. Thanks.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/13 03:51 PM
1

Ah I see. Well yes, my point was that even after 30, some still look better than your average non-model post-30 woman.
/r/TheRedPill08/03/13 01:52 PM
1

?
/r/TheRedPill07/03/13 07:42 PM
1

? You mean average length? Or having children?
/r/TheRedPill07/03/13 06:08 PM
1

Marriage is a biological problem?
/r/TheRedPill07/03/13 05:52 PM
3

Some of them don't look that bad. Marriage is not the problem, it's how the law and the courts have molded it into what it is today.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/13 02:28 PM
3

To be fair, this is the daily fail reporting, arguably UK's worst newspaper (though there is a tough competition at the bottom of that barrel)
/r/TheRedPill07/03/13 02:26 PM
2

I'm at work here, can't watch the vid. Can someone give a TLDR?
/r/TheRedPill06/03/13 03:32 PM
7

Culpability is not transferable. My christian friends would like a word with you... ;)
/r/MensRights06/03/13 01:29 PM
1

Private enterprise. Also, Bateman's principle
/r/MensRights06/03/13 01:28 PM
3

I am always enormously amused when people on blogs and websites put the trademark (TM) sign on the term "nice guys". As if they invented it and have it protected. Seen it on a number of blogs by now. Yeah, good luck with that one.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/13 06:57 PM
83

Nothing wrong about asking for proof from a total stranger about something you find suspicious. Probably the most mature reaction to someone asking for proof I have seen on reddit. Good on you.
/r/MensRights05/03/13 01:25 PM
1

OK - I'm not an American. Can someone please give me a quick TLDR about the VAWA, what it is, what's (partly?) wrong or right about it and why it's there?
/r/MensRights01/03/13 02:56 PM
2

Agree with all of this. Also: Document everything that happens, as it happens. Make voice notes with your smartphone, send emails to yourself describing what just happened - that way it is timestamped.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 06:26 PM
2

Can't say I agree
/r/TheRedPill28/02/13 01:43 PM
0

Nonsense. People have been fucking around since the dawn of time. For as long as there have been written works, fidelity and infidelity has been a major theme. Also, plenty of societies never were monogamous. The bible alone knows about half a dozen types of marriage which don't all just involve one man and one woman.
/r/TheRedPill28/02/13 02:14 AM
0

Yeah... you actually believe that?
/r/TheRedPill28/02/13 12:41 AM
0

I don't think it's ever worked.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/13 10:19 PM
0

50% divorce rates. Working splendidly.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/13 10:01 PM
0

We can try. Looking at statistics on divorce and fidelity, it's more effort than it's worth. Me, I rather embrace my human nature.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/13 09:22 PM
0

It is strong correlation for the argument that lasting monogamy is not part of human nature.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/13 09:14 PM
1

Don't believe in god or natural law you say? What type of philosophy do you subscribe to? God... for lack of evidence, I don't believe. Philosophy. A mix of nihilism (yep!), existentialism, solipsism and absurdism thrown into it. In broad strokes - we're here through physical (not spiritual) means, we come and go to and from nothing, there is no soul or dualism of body and mind, finding and defining meaning in life is up to you, so is exploring and defining moral and ethical conduct and proper r…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/13 09:04 PM
2

how was the procedure? I've been toying with the idea myself. Easy. Do it. Back in action a few days later. Stock up on frozen peas. Wait for the sperm count to drop after at least three months. The no fault divorce is like a no fault seizure of half your assets. One of many reasons I have great hesitations on marriage. religious marriage is ... based on an unbreakable oath It gets broken often enough. Also I don't believe in god and natural law. But I grant you that religious folk have lower di…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/13 07:56 PM
2

Now we're getting somewhere. Let's finish this debate first and then I'd be happy to discuss the operation and similar RP stuff with you. Sounds good? In fact, let's make it two strands of conversation, for the sake of clarity. Men were made for women, and women for men. I think this is the crux of your position. you have control over your fertility, your not infertile. A quick unsnip and you're back in business. But people exist who are born infertile. Some women get cancer and have to have a h…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/13 07:49 PM
2

Buddy, you started the ad hominem train here. What does that say about your debating skills? I just played the ball back. Alright, I'll make a final attempt to get you back on topic. You say that two men cannot naturally procreate and thus should not be allowed to marry. Now I have in fact had a vasectomy and am not capable of procreation either. Therefore should I be prevented from marrying the woman I love?
/r/TheRedPill27/02/13 07:24 PM
3

More failed attempts at at ad hominem. You are amusing. Please, which argument of yours did I not refute conclusively? Oh wait, none. PS: Get out of the closet already...
/r/TheRedPill27/02/13 07:04 PM
3

Pretty obvious. You had ample opportunity to address my arguments. You failed to do so in any manner whatsoever. Hence, you're full of it. Ya know, logic.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/13 06:52 PM
3

You're a coward. IVF is a well-known procedure. Anyway, it's not that gay people cannot reproduce. They can. They have the equipment. What they lack is the inclination. Anyway, it's been fun kicking your ass. Let me known when you need another lesson in basic logic.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/13 06:40 PM
3

You're frustrated. You're a closet homosexual. If you put two of the same sex in a room for a year, a baby would not be made. Agree it disagree? That's not how the world works. And you know it. Now, for the fourth time, Should a person be stopped from marrying due to infertility, YES or NO? Incidentally, by all rules of argument, a submission in argument that is not countered when given the opportunity is a submission that is admitted as true. So unless you answer the question, you are accepting…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/13 06:34 PM
4

I think you're confused. And I think you're a moron. Shall we continue with the ad hominem or get back on topic? Civil law is a mess for sure, but on religious grounds You're backpaddling. Very few countries insist on religious marriages (like Israel) and many (like Germany) don't even recognize it. Men and women typically are not sterile Men and women are typically not homosexual either. Gays make up a comparatively tiny percentage of the population. Homo sexuals have never been able to reprodu…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/13 06:23 PM
3

That's not what I asked. You said that people who cannot have children (in which you erroneously included gay people) should not be permitted to marry because the point of marriage is to further society according to you. Hence I asked if I would be banned from marriage for grounds of sterility. You did not answer that question and instead commented on divorce, not marriage. Let me ask again: If a person is sterile, should he/she not be allowed to marry due to the inability to have children? (PS:…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/13 06:01 PM
3

Interesting. So if I were sterile (for whatever reason, radiation or had a vasectomy) should I not be allowed to marry? Because I cannot have children? What if I wanted to adopt? Also, thanks to things like IVF, lesbians can and do have children. So if everyone became homosexual, society would NOT be dead in a generation. Anyway, how does this connect to religion? Does this discussion not show that morality and law can be and are independent from religion?
/r/TheRedPill27/02/13 05:48 PM
2

Hm. Looks like I'm working with a bunch of animals. Jokes aside... It's probably not a coincidence that the (blip of the) nuclear family coincided with an apex of civilization. Sorry, it didn't. The "nuclear family" existed before civilization. As far as anthropologists can tell, humans always had adopted a mating strategy of serial monogamy. That is, a nuclear family for a few years until the offspring could survive and gather food by itself. As I said, serial monogamy is a viable option. There…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/13 05:34 PM
5

an inclination towards monogamy but society does not support it. Maybe, but my point is... human nature does not seem to support it.
/r/TheRedPill27/02/13 05:06 PM
0

I was shocked the first time I came across all the talk on this subreddit about monogamy and how that's what you are supposed to strive for, when this red pill stuff is supposed to be about the underlying layers of sexuality and relationships. Me too. My opinion is that humanity is moving away from the mono- model of relationships and towards a more open and non-possessive model. Not sure. There will always be some who keep the dream alive and some who see the world for what it is. Back 500 year…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/13 05:05 PM
4

I am not sure that I follow you. What do you mean by "Home sexuality"? I guess you meant homosexuality (i.e. gayness). Am I right? (Maybe you fell victim to autocorrect on your phone?) So are you saying that since gay people don't have children ("create societies") and therefore are against religion because religion is concerned with society? If so, that ignores the notion that sexuality is not a polar issue but a spectrum. What about bisexual people? Anyway. I'd like to know how natural law req…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/13 05:01 PM
1

Yeah, I got that when I read this: All her holes are used by these men. In every possible way. After oral most women swallow
/r/TheRedPill27/02/13 02:39 PM
5

Yes religion, especially hebrew-based religions are big on things like morality and laws and charity. Moses was one of the first law-givers we know of. Throwing that away with atheism discards a lot of baby with the bathwater. But many of those exact laws are extremely immoral (prohibition of homosexuality for one), punitive and often ridiculous (blended fabrics...) So it's not an either/or issue. Regarding mormonism, they are no better than the other big religions when it comes to silliness and…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/13 02:30 PM
13

Non-christian here. I do not understand the RedPill fascination and obsession with monogamy. A lot of RP stuff is about realism and recognizing the world for what it really is. The notion that we can have a person, and stay monogamous to her and not want to see another person naked for the next 70+ years is extremely unrealistic. Just look at divorce statistics. The idea that someone else will stay this monogamous to us is equally silly in my opinion. Having a (slightly) open relationship is IME…
/r/TheRedPill27/02/13 02:19 PM
2

"Your Honor, Starfleet was founded to seek out new life; well, there it sits!"
/r/MensRights26/02/13 01:22 PM
1

Well... Isn't that the case with everything? If only people thought things through and took personal responsibility, we'd be living in a very different world.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 12:53 PM
1

I'm quite aware of the risks and I take all the appropriate steps to minimize them. There is always a residual risk of course, but it is manageable. I am very much aware that the law is not in my favour.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 12:25 AM
1

Fair enough. In which case, maybe a more 'serious' website would suit your needs better, based on my experience. eHarmony, Match and other (usually paid-for) sites tend to be populated with a higher percentage of people looking for serious and lasting and committed relationships. OKC and PoF are quite casual IME.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 12:22 AM
3

Why does this sub love to hate on casual sex? I have no problem with others being careful or faithful or monastic or traditional or old-fashioned. Conversely, I don't think I harm anyone when I honestly state that none of those things are my cup of tea and that I prefer consensual casualness. My decision, my STD risks.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 05:46 AM
4

Ahem. If you expect logical consistency from women, or people in general, you're gonna have a bad time.
/r/MensRights25/02/13 05:40 AM
1

This was pretty much my thought. why... why... why... would you talk about MRA stuff... ON FRIGGIN OKC? It is the surest way to not get laid. I have met, and slept with, a number of girls from OKC who on their profiles consider themselves "feminists". They're not. If they are on OKC... they are not. It's simply not a radfem hangout. What the OKC girls mean by feminist (I suppose, I HAVE NOT BROUGHT UP THE TOPC as I prefer to get laid) is that they enjoy voting and having a salary and don't want …
/r/MensRights25/02/13 05:39 AM
2

True, voluntary service > involuntary service. Keep in mind that those 1% have spouses, siblings, parents, children, friends, co-workers, bosses, employees, students, mentees, etc. If the draft was reality in the US, the US would very quickly become a lot more pacifist. How many people do you meet who claim that they "support our troops" and out of those, how many would actually agree to serve? If somehow the general draft had been instated a few years ago and the general populace would have bee…
/r/MensRights22/02/13 01:59 PM
7

Eh, that blogger is a loser and sellout. Ignore.
/r/seduction18/02/13 08:51 PM
1

Oh. Well watch "Starship Troopers" when you get the chance, it is a hilarious movie.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 06:23 PM
1

??? I was making a Starship Troopers reference FWIW...
/r/MensRights15/02/13 05:00 PM
7

My dad was a SAHD. He was/is awesome.
/r/MensRights15/02/13 02:58 PM
1

WOULD YOU LIKE TO KNOW MORE?
/r/MensRights15/02/13 03:14 AM
1

I'm thinking it's just cowardly. It probably is. Would there be any value in telling him to man-up? Well... what's the value in it for me? What's the point of "manning up" if it does not improve my life situation?
/r/MensRights14/02/13 11:23 PM
23

Somewhat going against the crowd here... I'm an MRA. But I never, ever, talk about it in public. I never argue. I never debate. Changing the world is not part of my job description. I simply use the knowledge that I find here to my advantage. I avoid getting married, sexism where possible, document things as they happen in case I need evidence, that sort of thing. If you promote men's rights publicly, I will cheer for you. But anonymously only over the internet. For me, the societal fallout is n…
/r/MensRights13/02/13 02:58 PM
3

Never. And I don't have much of a problem with it, since it is an expression of Bateman's Principle
/r/MensRights13/02/13 02:48 PM
1

Well I don't know the actress, but in this picture, she's in Oxford.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 02:12 AM
1

The background... That's Oxford University. I'm 99.9% certain. The building in the background is known as the Radcliffe Camera.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 10:13 PM
4

A tale rarely told in todays media. Maybe I'm suffering from confirmation bias, but I've lately (i.e. the last two years or so) been seeing this glorification of bromance everywhere. I cannot say I'm too keen on it because it seems very contrived. However to each their own...
/r/MensRights08/02/13 01:55 PM
3

True, but he is innocent until proven guilty. In the absence of evidence, one does not have to remain agnostic.
/r/MensRights04/02/13 06:13 PM
1

You should meet some non-hollywood criminals some time... ;)
/r/TheRedPill01/02/13 09:19 PM
1

Okay, so you support beheading women for going out alone at night in Saudi Arabia, because although you recognize that it is am imperfect solution, the world is imperfect and so then so be it. No. But you are taking an argument ad absurdum. On beheading and capital punishment generally: I think it's wrong and should be stopped, but I recognize that some countries will have capital punishment for a long time. Just because we have imperfect solutions, it does not mean that I cannot prefer one impe…
/r/MensRights31/01/13 10:40 PM
3

Yup. We always live in an imperfect world with imperfect solutions. And always will.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 01:18 PM
1

Yes most probably a dead letter law.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 02:57 PM
1

It's discriminatory because it plays to male strengths: like . . . strength and stamina Yes but this does not matter. The overriding purpose of the military is the defence of the realm, not to further civil rights. If there was a branch of the military which had requirements which would cater to women's strengths, I'd be perfectly content to have that branch filled 99% with women if they can perform a better job there than 99% of men.
/r/MensRights24/01/13 05:12 PM
2

Something makes me suspect that to you anything but your exact opinion will be equivalent to "not having taken the pill."
/r/TheRedPill16/01/13 03:52 AM
0

I get that. Sorry if I crossed a line. Fun discussion though!
/r/TheRedPill15/01/13 06:43 PM
0

PS. My initial statement was an exaggerated, attention-grabbing and hyperbolic sentence designed to create controversy and attention (and it did that quite well) followed by a more nuanced discussion. Not a fan of that approach? I wonder, since it's the same approach you use on your blog when you post as a headline in bold letters that Vaccines do cause autism even though you now say that you don't know...
/r/TheRedPill15/01/13 06:35 PM
0

Please. Your "teach the controversy" attitude on vaccines is about has helpful as hole in the chest. You know what's also not been researched? The link between air travel and autism. Maybe flying in airplanes causes autism. Can you find a single study disproving that? No? I'll start a blog now about the POSSIBLE dangers that flying on a plane poses to CHILDREN GETTING AUTISM. Because it could be true! Maybe the airlines are suppressing evidence! Oh, and the science stuff? Let's talk darwin somet…
/r/TheRedPill15/01/13 06:11 PM
0

Absence of (peer-reviewed double-blind) evidence (of the danger of vaccines) is not evidence of absence (of such dangers). I'd agree with that, except that then I'd have to find cause in anything for everything. Again, my null hypothesis. The fact that vaccine makers have special privileges indicates and goes out of its way to prevent these proper studies from being done tends to indicate [...] that some skepticism is called for Quid bono. It is useful, and maybe there is a conspiracy (though I …
/r/TheRedPill15/01/13 05:57 PM
-1

I didn't make any claim. I didn't say you had. Do vaccines cause autism? Not as far as I am aware. As I said: I'm perfectly fine to assume no link, no cause, in the absence of evidence to the contrary as a null hypothesis. In the alternative, according to your reasoning, I'd have to prove, scientifically, that anything in my environment does not cause autism. Which is both insane and impossible.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/13 05:50 PM
0

I hear you. What he is doing is "preaching the controversy" on vaccines. What he has said over and over, right here, is there is no proof, none whatsoever, that vaccines are safe or that vaccines are dangerous. Is that clear enough? Quite. And my position is that one need not be agnostic in such a position.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/13 05:48 PM
1

(laughs) More hubris. Also, two responses to one post? Oh, I am honoured! If the question of vaccine safety is unfalsifiable I did not say that. I took what you said: The link, or lack of a link, is unknown. It is impossible to say. As the basis of discussion, for the sake of argument. And then I explained that one need not stay agnostic on an issue due to this. Do you even realize how far in over your head you are? I know, us normals, citing back your own words to you... please be patient with …
/r/TheRedPill15/01/13 05:42 PM
0

And I also said: you cannot prove a negative. That does not mean you must stay agnostic on an issue. emphasis mine
/r/TheRedPill15/01/13 05:37 PM
0

You're running away now I'm not. Though I'm getting hungry. Mmm, lunch. as expected Oh, the hubris. the burden of proof is on you because you claimed vaccines do not cause autism, [...] That is a positive claim. A positive claim would be that there is a link, a causal relationship. You're turning it around based on nothing at all. I'm perfectly fine to assume no link, no cause, in the absence of evidence to the contrary as a null hypothesis. In the alternative, according to your reasoning, I'd h…
/r/TheRedPill15/01/13 05:36 PM
-1

observably Ah, the semantic laurels of objectivity donned to oneself.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/13 05:27 PM
1

Er, no. what he said was: You simply cannot say that no vaccine, or combination of vaccines, do not cause autism.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/13 05:25 PM
1

Okay. I misconstrued his point.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/13 05:22 PM
5

Fair point. I misconstrued that he was replying to my original post, rather than the notion that I disagree with 90% of your posts. Of course the economy is in shits. If you say that the sky is blue, I'd agree with you too. Gun control, free trade, segregation, etc. is what I mean.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/13 05:19 PM
0

So you're saying that the lack of falsifiable information creates room for doubt? Preach the controversy! I cannot prove that there is NOT a god called Thor, or Xenu or Jahwe. But the burden of proof is not on me. TLDR you cannot prove a negative. That does not mean you must stay agnostic on an issue.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/13 05:15 PM
-1

you're saying the global economy is in fine shape Where? free trade and mass open immigration is good for US workers where? gun control is a good idea that will reduce the homicide rate Not something I even mentioned in passing. and Congress should raise the debt limit You're reading a lot into this. It's called projecting. Joe Webb has a great future as an NFL quarterback and Peyton Manning should win the MVP Not into spectator sports. You're going to stand on those points, are you? You go, gam…
/r/TheRedPill15/01/13 05:12 PM
1

Fair question. Because he does an AMA here. And it's part of the whole discussion. If it goes against the subreddit rules, my apologies.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/13 05:04 PM
2

Hey look at me, I can do ad hominem!
/r/TheRedPill15/01/13 05:02 PM
1

True. I just dislike / disagree with his stance on, say, segregation too. To just name one thing among the other stuff.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/13 05:01 PM
0

Fine. Vaccines. Autism. A link or not? I remember you blogging about it, so unless you've changed your position since, my assessment stands.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/13 04:57 PM
0

No, I disagree with virtually everything he says. Game is the only thing he gets somewhat right.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/13 04:54 PM
2

Read his blog. He's big on it. Or just ask.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/13 04:52 PM
1

Thanks I'm a dude. I almost respected his writings on game. But it is impossible to respect anyone who seriously humors the notion that vaccines cause autism, in addition to other nonsense he sprouts.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/13 04:45 PM
-3

superintelligence Self-declared. Some intelligence. Why do we humor this christian apologist anti-science pro-segregation racist vaccines-cause-autism anti-free-trade faux libertarian troglodyte?
/r/TheRedPill15/01/13 04:41 PM
50

Dude. That kid is going to grow up realizing that you were the best dad he could wish for. Even if your ex-wife somehow manages to establish a relationship with him... sooner or later he'll realize that she's crazy and you're not. As children grow up (as I have), they tend to fully realize how much blood sweat and tears being a parent was. I see my other friends having kids now and it makes me appreciate my parents in ways I never thought possible. Chin up bro. It can only get better.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 04:09 PM
5

ITT: MRAs are whovians. Who'd'a thought?
/r/MensRights11/01/13 04:47 PM
4

It's after the fact rationalizations. Slept with they guy? Oh yeah, his confidence and approach are just so cool and attractive. Didn't sleep with the guy? What a creep.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 02:22 PM
1

So I say this with the utmost affection and admiration: Back off, stay-at-home dads. Pretty much agreed
/r/MensRights09/01/13 07:10 PM
1

I guess it goes towards two notions: What gets measured gets managed - Peter Drucker. The idea is keeping track of yourself gives you a better and more objective idea of what you're doing and where you're going. Expressing emotions somehow is often considered therapeutic. Writing out thoughts, like asking for advice or counseling is often a way to express or learn to express yourself and listen to your own thoughts. It gets suggested reasonably frequently in pop- and normal psychology. Still, a …
/r/MensRights07/01/13 09:30 PM
1

I fail to see the relevance, but no I would not
/r/MensRights07/01/13 05:56 AM
1

That and some of us don't want to get married.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 09:05 PM
3

Fair enough
/r/MensRights04/01/13 08:40 PM
3

Most of them do. Smartphones.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 08:34 PM
7

That depends. In some states single-party recording is legal, in others (like California) you have to have the consent of both parties: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telephone_recording_laws#United_States
/r/MensRights04/01/13 07:51 PM
6

Using. See. There's the problem. And it causes problems. And those problems cause further problems. I use words to say words and these words mean words. If I keep repeating words, it'll amount to an argument. Not. Consensual mutual use is the basis of friendship, relationships, the economy... I use my boss for a salary, he uses me to get client work done. I use my friends for stimulating conversations. They use me for the same. The consensual aspect makes the difference between the thief and the…
/r/MensRights04/01/13 07:48 PM
1

It's got nothing to do with my own moral standard. Sure does not sound that way. But OK. Ever heard of cause and effect? ... If you treat people like they're cerebus to be charmed into abandoning the gate to their meat hole so you can catch a nut and walk away, those people will build resentments. Except my point is that these non-monogamous situations can and often are consensual. Plenty of women enjoy no-strings-attached sex. They're using me as much as I use them. Your conclusion could not be…
/r/MensRights04/01/13 07:12 PM
8

When are you guys going to learn that if you have to go through all these hoops to catch a nut that it just isn't fucking worth it. Live and let live buddy. Some people like monogamy. Some don't. Different strokes for different folks. Personally I could not do monogamy. Try having real relationships Try not judging Don't you realize that these shallow non-relationships that treat intimacy like a soccer ball only serve to fucking create and exacerbate more insane feminists? No I don't because it'…
/r/MensRights04/01/13 06:55 PM
2

Maybe. But it'll be a bit more tricky to sell to the jury, especially if you can manage to get some clearly consensual PDA on tape in there. There is no 100% insurance or certainty. There is also no such thing as luck. There is only adequate or inadequate preparation in dealing with a statistical universe.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 06:49 PM
12

Or don't have one night stands. Well yes obviously. Same as avoiding sex and women altogether tends to reduce these issues.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 04:17 PM
77

Here's a tip: If you have a one-night stand with a woman, take her to breakfast somewhere. Ideally where they have CCTV or the staff knows you. Pay with credit card to leave a papertrail. Not bulletproof either, but it helps.
/r/MensRights04/01/13 01:32 PM
10

sign in (anonymously) through their facebook It's not anonymous
/r/MensRights02/01/13 10:57 PM
10

anger is not actually problematic. disgust is the language of violence however. well spotted.
/r/MensRights21/12/12 07:16 PM
-1

It's the Daily Fail. One of the worst newspapers on the planet. What did you expect?
/r/MensRights19/12/12 06:29 PM
0

Actually I love doing stuff like that as I enjoy having women around. Holding open doors. Walking on the curb side. Helping them to their coats. Yes, getting up for women. I feel under no obligation to do it, but boy do they eat that shit up on dates.
/r/MensRights28/11/12 02:55 PM
0

Let's have a campaign for equal heights?
/r/MensRights23/11/12 02:20 PM
2

Indeed. I had no idea, thanks for the heads up.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 09:26 PM
1

Only NY still has at-fault divorce
/r/MensRights21/11/12 07:42 PM
–

If the whole thing goes to court, which is very unlikely. A good lawyer manages to avoid that 9/10 times. Besides my point is that there is a difference between saying "No, I did not get a vasectomy and yes you will have more children" and not mentioning it, avoiding the topic and having unprotected sex. One is an active lie, the other is an omission. Big difference.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 06:33 PM
–

False. There is no legal requirement for him to inform his wife about any vasectomies. It's something of a breach of trust, but only if they operate on a full disclosure honesty level. Few relationships in my experience do so.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 05:52 PM
–

Do 1 and 3 2 will end the relationship (and OP does not seem to want that), 4 is ineffective IME and often hostile to men
/r/MensRights21/11/12 03:45 PM
-5

I'm an MRA, liberal (moderate) and I hate libertarians, checking in. Libertarianism is as idiotic as communism in my opinion.
/r/MensRights16/11/12 10:34 PM
1

Really? AFF never worked for me. A few token women and masses of horny men.
/r/MensRights14/11/12 07:04 PM
–

Those free services are mostly just full of people looking for hook ups Like me. And for that purpose, they deliver :)
/r/MensRights14/11/12 06:26 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter