TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

ImOverIt0011 Archive

View 1 post and 110 comments by ImOverIt0011 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
9

Edu./Occu.ImOverIt0011/r/MensRights03/08/23 11:22 AM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

A woman giving advice to other women that benefits her knowing that women will agree with her because they are all women.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 02:41 PM
4

What?
/r/MensRights08/08/23 02:27 PM
1

This is what we've been waiting for though. Before they weren't comfortable so they hid it better. Now that they are comfortable it's becoming harder and harder to deny. Less games. They are stepping out in to the open and that's exactly what it takes to cause a change. We don't need to call it out and get shit on constantly for it, as it becomes impossible to ignore even white knight dumbasses will see the light.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 02:19 PM
1

Femdom shit is as old as time, dominatrix etc. Idk how this is new news. There's something about being able to release control but I've found in our present society it's almost always the most high achieving men and women who want someone to take control at the end of the day. It's an obsession with perfection I believe, like a disruption of the anima/inner feminine in this case. Instead of a warm supportive wife who cares for you and supports you, the mind of men can go to different places. Thi…
/r/MensRights08/08/23 02:00 PM
1

I think men just tend to view sacrifice as not sacrifice like moreso just a part of life and being. Like it's fundamental in my eyes. The universe being impersonal, I just function in it and I think many men feel the same way. Women tend to view sacrifice as something forced on them or pressed on to them by men. I think they perceive the world as more personal maybe idk. Tis truly a mystery. Either way, I think they perceive reality as mean lmao. That's why women be freaking out and men are like…
/r/MensRights08/08/23 11:48 AM
4

Step 1. Men stop giving money to women. Step 2. Women realize they fucking hate working. Step 3. 70% of women turn trad and dress up cute and want babies. Step 4. Men regain voting power and authority. Step 5. Men vote on policy and overthrow corrupt men in the better interests of their families Step 6. Social reform based on the future of said families and providence for future generations involving economic stability, equity , growth etc. Assuming men care about the future of their children an…
/r/MensRights08/08/23 11:40 AM
4

As one myself I can say we definitely are. ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯
/r/MensRights08/08/23 11:34 AM
3

30 year old man comes home with his hands shaking from neuropathy due to 15 years of moving heavy stones "Did ya survive another day at work Donny? C'mere and let me take care a ya, the kids are in bed and there's a (MEAT) pie warm on the stove" She takes her calloused man hands dry and cracked from a day of washing laundry and digging in the garden, joints thick from years of at home work projects ", That'll do ya up for another three days at work. And then, I'm going to have a shower so we can…
/r/MensRights08/08/23 11:04 AM
5

Furthermore there were many different societies with different patriarchal systems which in many instances just basically meant land ownership and wealth transferred by sons. Women still were involved in politics, religion, were writers etc. But even early modern feminists had to relent that if they didn't basically shame women in to it, too many women would rather stay home and be wives than join the work force. Luckily for them you can make women do pretty much anything by saying they will be …
/r/MensRights08/08/23 10:59 AM
18

Women good/Men bad---> women vote for you ---> women spend money on purses and nails ---> profit. Men self loathe ----> go to work ---> get whipped around by wife ---> divorce raped ---> kids raised by single mothers ----> decadent society where women rule, buy purses and get butt injections ---> money. Just corporations and politicians exploiting women's narcissim. Imo. There could be more to it.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 10:56 AM
101

The judge wrote (and read aloud in court): “Dr. Pearce testified that the current research suggests that women do not suffer from paraphilic disorders apart from masochism. This fact lends further weight to the conclusion that pedophilia does not apply to you.” In an interview this week with the Star, Pearce emphasized the scarcity of research literature on female sex offenders. “I’m not saying there’s no such thing as a female pedophile, but it is almost an exclusively male disorder. “That’s no…
/r/MensRights08/08/23 10:51 AM
20

She wasn't even put on an offenders list
/r/MensRights08/08/23 10:43 AM
1

It's true though it facilitates a bit more of their arguments like "women couldn't own property!" (My daddy owned all five of our estates. :() or , maybe the most fair argument I ever hear is about higher education which the only ones really being deprived of it directly would have been the bourgeois women, since the poor men and women were so far from even contemplating it they hardly had time to miss it lol.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 10:23 AM
1

"wine break" lmao. Nice.
/r/MensRights08/08/23 10:20 AM
16

Dw homie. You're right about the picture. The key to happiness is to focusing on what makes men happy. We are fulfilled by achievement. In this world we don't have rights of passage but what we can do is create our own goals from the challenges infront of us and derive dignity and fulfillment from pursuing those goals, facing the struggles and over years of suffering and struggle achieve them. Strengthen your body, take care of your diet - bring out of your genetics what makes a man feel like a …
/r/MensRights07/08/23 10:29 PM
1

He did it all for nookie.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 10:21 PM
6

I have a younger sister and she was a psychological terrorist. Crybully, she would fasly accuse me of beating her to get the Nintendo. She was jealous because I was three years older and superior to her in every way. Her skills were decent but ultimately pathetic. She couldn't even finish mini game island on Mario party 64. She never won Mario Kart. She was nothing. She'd always freak out when she wanted on and become more sneaky with age. One time she bit herself so hard and ran to our parents.…
/r/MensRights07/08/23 10:19 PM
11

Iirc there was a book written early on like "The women's Bible" or something, and a few of the women contributing were reverends in different churches, mediums, new agey types. You know, bullshitters.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 10:12 PM
5

You could just as easily (and better) answer your questions with any of "gynocentrism", "they're man hating cunts", "women are mentally and morally deficient", etc. as with seizing the means of reproduction. That would bring us down to feminists level though no one wants to live to that low of a standard smh.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 10:09 PM
7

Since feminists wrote women's history as it's known today from standpoint theory, it's not easy to determine even how oppressed women were. Women in the 1800s were writers, reverends, one ran for president but she fuckin sucked so she lost, theyve historically managed properties and owned businesses, unmarried women fucked their ways across the world lmao. The 1700s was mostly communal. Women weren't forced in to strict gender roles. Most gender roles began to shift after the schism of the Chris…
/r/MensRights07/08/23 10:06 PM
38

It's no surprise so many women want power ripped from them and want unhealthy levels of dominance and aggression in men etc. It's crying out for something very obvious to me. If it became known to the public that early feminists were explicitly against women having choice and purposefully shamed them in to believing their instinct to be mothers and stay home and be taken care of , in order to force them in to the workforce to fulfill their agenda, women would probably begin to wake up. Most of t…
/r/MensRights07/08/23 10:00 PM
158

Like most women he believes drunk bathroom girls are the epitome of good people. Like most women, he believes what women say but is totally obvious to their actions. Loyalty , devotion, dedication, quiet sacrifice - these things are lost on the majority of women who didn't have strong fathers. 1/3 of households in america at least, and say another 1/3 with weak father figures at least, that leaves at best 1/3 of the population who is even raised with adequate masculine figures. The rest of us ha…
/r/MensRights07/08/23 09:52 PM
3

Desire is a state of mind that can be self destructive. "Take a moment to appreciate where you are and what you have right now, because years ago you would have done anything to have it"
/r/MensRights07/08/23 04:56 PM
2

A man will bail her out or do the bulk of the work to make it stay together. If no men are involved it falls apart. Bet you $50 let's go.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 04:47 PM
3

Idk man the writer herself said it's meant to be a dual message. Based on what I've seen there was very selective messaging trying to prove a point. Why would she say that if it was meant to be an isometric delusional fantasy. Why the significant story arc with the little girl and her mother. Why does Barbie leave boss babe land at the end and go to the real world. People don't really have a good understanding of feminist history and theory which is very very anti-christian and traditional. So i…
/r/MensRights07/08/23 11:19 AM
1

Yup that was a wild ride and based on different things people have said I thought a similar pattern was there though it haven't seen it personally. Seeing the Barbie as a monolith really gave me the corporate vibe and the space odyssey reference was great there. Seeing the girls smash the barbies in rage really was coherent with early feminist and theosophical pagan goddess references which had no children themselves. The world is dystopian and superficial. Like duh. It's not a good place to be.…
/r/MensRights07/08/23 11:08 AM
3

How do you overlook this stuff with your partner? It's been an issue for me because I know I simply can't speak candidly around women about anything because they are all so obvious to reality.
/r/MensRights07/08/23 10:46 AM
2

https://www.amazon.ca/gp/product/B09NK9TNYD/ref=dbs_a_def_awm_bibl_vppi_i0 I'm reading this book right now. Based on what it's saying it wouldn't matter. But she's orthodox Christian so a bit bias but it's still an interesting perspective. But basically, protestant religion spread west and by the time it reached america it was fractured in to many sectors. From that began to spring the sort of free love, free sex, transcendental new age stuff. And with that came the concepts of anti-essentialism…
/r/MensRights06/08/23 10:04 PM
2

The great fem-boy movement of the last few years will be documented in history as one of the most perditious attempts of sacrilege. We must repent and accept that our sins are cleansed only by the great saint Lizzo, who did sup with dancers upon the bananas baptized in great women's vaginas. Blessed be her name.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 09:50 PM
2

My asshole releases the insidious whispers of misogyny in to the night. I am just born evil. Praise cardi B may I be delivered from my primordial sin.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 09:39 PM
3

Even my asshole is misogynistic if it offends women. Smh.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 09:22 PM
1

Say the line
/r/MensRights06/08/23 05:08 PM
2

Taylor Swifts narcissim has become so demonic her body would reject any other life to preserve itself anyway.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 01:34 PM
1

Respect.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 11:01 AM
3

Or they will just get angry, label you a misogynistic asshole and tell all their friends.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 10:54 AM
2

The Angler fish absorbs its mates in to it's body for sustenance and absorbs their calories. Is this what happens to her Ex's? Hopefully she will be done absorbing soon.
/r/MensRights06/08/23 10:27 AM
10

She seems like the kind of chick who freaks out and smashes dishes when she doesn't get her way. I think she does care about mens issues and feelings and genuinely is disgusted by the way society and other women treat men but that doesn't mean she's for men or would be willing to let go of her own view points to sympathize with men, and really she doesn't have to. She's a sex worker and very dramatic, highly "progressive" and in many of the new agey type of ways too. It doesn't take a genius to …
/r/MensRights05/08/23 11:00 PM
3

Imo men's rights won't have a shot until it's taught in schools the same as all the other plights of "victimized oppressed groups" is. The problem with mens issues is that we tend to look at things more balanced and through other peoples perspective which is less emotional and less rewarding. All movements of the "disadvantaged" are subjective and weave factual observations of reality with emotional/subjective bias in to general descriptions - essentially, they are highly discriminatory but it's…
/r/MensRights05/08/23 10:49 PM
5

I don't speak for the sub but on a personal level I have a deep amount of empathy for the struggles those with gender dysphoria deal with. Not that you have to qualify yourself in any way but if you've silently suffered the reality of being an outcast for no reason or fault of your own and managed to not let it shape you in to a terrible person you're probably good people in my book. Hopefully you can find some sort of value out of conversation here, though I suspect for many of us no place is h…
/r/MensRights05/08/23 08:55 PM
153

It's in the course because it's been more and more systemically imbedded in academia since the 50's at least. That might not be the most rewarding answer but it's the truth. It's there because it's like religious dogma. It's not true and you have to keep in mind that even if people do care that it's bullshit, no one is going to do anything. Think about it as religious dogma and learn about how it was pushed in to academia if you're interested in it but try not to lose too much sleep over it. It'…
/r/MensRights05/08/23 06:45 PM
20

I already told them pretty much this exact same history lesson yesterday they are so embedded in what they're been told it really is like trying to teach a rock it's hopeless.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 05:42 PM
24

This is what standpoint theory does to your worldview lads take note. It's all subjective which is why they will go on to say "women felt they couldn't, they were told they couldn't, etc etc" despite the really reality being that there haven't been real barriers for decades. Pure subjective nonsense parroted by bots.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 05:40 PM
2

I don't know why I'm being downvoted but yeah it's true. Women basically do this through passive means whereas a man has to do it actively and with intention. Did I mention somewhere that I think it's not a "fair" strategy? I don't think I did. Infact I think it's the right choice for most men to apply this in a divorce if she becomes a ruthless android, but I don't want to say that since it's a bad look for the sub. But since I'm being downvoted for not saying so - if you're in a divorce with a…
/r/MensRights05/08/23 03:17 PM
3

ChatGPT encouraged me to gaslight and abuse my wife over time. I asked it specifically "if I had no choice but to enter the game how would I win" Winning in a scenario with such stacked rules and limited options requires careful planning and resourcefulness. Here are some strategies you could consider: Analyze Weaknesses: Look for any potential weaknesses or blind spots in your opponent's strategy or behavior. Exploit those weaknesses to gain an advantage. Mind Games: Use psychological tactics t…
/r/MensRights05/08/23 11:29 AM
3

From the woman's standpoint it's Patriarchy that doesn't hold the other woman accountable. You don't have to understand it because it's subjective and delusional. I keep repeating this because it's important to notice that most of these people only understand reality from their own perspectives. There is no reasoning with them, you can only bombard them with facts about reality and move on.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 11:15 AM
3

Standpoint Theory. Delusional by nature and it's the backbone of progressive ideology. You can't reason with it it's literally impossible. The only way to deal with it is through action which is why men are walking away.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 11:03 AM
3

Damn me for thinking people should be paid on merit and value they create and go the extra mile to balance the equations they are part of. !!! It's so much less entitled to expect it for free !!!
/r/MensRights05/08/23 10:50 AM
4

I don't give a fuck.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 10:44 AM
9

Why is it so emphasized on women working full time smh this should be the same either way. Stop your nonsense.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 10:44 AM
6

It's possible that person (A) time is more valuable than person (B) time, and if my partner made more I would feel obligated to go the extra mile and support them a bit more. Reverse the roles now so she makes more. Obviously you won't admit it and you'll say you feel the same but that's not true. You're just sexist which is why you are trying to paint a victimized view of women. Yawn.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 10:43 AM
2

That's the beauty of immigration man all we have to do is keep the poor countries poor and making kids and we can keep resupplying the west. Fund some private military forces to go interfere with politics, make the economic development unstable and unlivable and then provide more easy escape for people who want to leave. They get assimilated in to the woke monoculture, after 2-3 generations any traditional values they have are lost and their family lineage is now part of the human battery projec…
/r/MensRights05/08/23 10:38 AM
12

So women feel entitled to be paid and compensated the same for less valuable work but men are the "entitled ones" for refusing to stick to their value. This is like women's vs men's sports lmao. One team bringing in billions, the other can't even fill the arena, but demanding equal pay despite not getting equal results. THAT'S LITERALLY ENTITLEMENT. Slave moralists and feminists have to be careful throwing that word around because y'all are going to start really overstepping and making it too ea…
/r/MensRights05/08/23 10:35 AM
4

If he's making more and contributing more then yeah, that's how the world works.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 10:32 AM
4

How women have to work cuz men are lazy or some bullshit like that . That men are saying fuck this and women cant find top earner, sexy men who want to wife and start families with them at 35 is already a constant point of complaining in mainstream circles.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 10:31 AM
8

"finding myself" Sleeping with as many women as possible while you make her wait as your last resort of course. Or until she's making enough you can feel safe and secure sitting in her house. Or both. Depends how oppressed you feel that day.
/r/MensRights05/08/23 10:27 AM
3

The average woman would just watch it and be like "there are other men in the video???"
/r/MensRights04/08/23 02:43 PM
5

The more self control men have the more desperate and unstable women who base their self worth off sexual value become so men can still thrive and have control. Decadence weakens them. I really get tired with our societies constant obsession with sex.
/r/MensRights04/08/23 10:48 AM
8

women were oppressed for thousands of years by male/masculine values. What is actually meant by oppression? Because it varies wildly. No one is saying that there weren't societal inequalities against women. Reality is it wasn't that men purposefully created. If you want to blame RELIGION for oppressing women, you have a stronger foothold there. But it's men that are blamed. Religion is just as stupid as feminism. Feminism does not consider men the oppressors, rather everyone is involved in this …
/r/MensRights03/08/23 08:23 PM
1

Lol sounds like some sort of narcisstic projection to me I would prefer to live in Nietzches world where "Women, remember to let the child in man live free" or something to that effect. I reckon Stalin wasn't too good with kids lmao. Lukacs perspective sounds interesting gotta note that. And yeah, alchemy is weird it only applies to certain types of thinkers but essentially drawing upon and catabolizing, illucidating or depending on your perspective giving form and voice to the aspect known as t…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 07:51 PM
2

I think it's because you didn't attack the argument directly so it seems like a waste of time to speak to you. Here's my position - Standpoint Theory has been a abused beyond it's original purpose. It has been used to create a narrative from the standpoint of (Women) that (Men/The Patriarchy). Women are inherently oppressed and see the truth of reality, whereas men are blinded by their own privilege. This is the first stage of Standpoint Theory and we don't even have to get to the second wave an…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 07:45 PM
2

Thanks for telling me so much about how you, the people, sees me. Made my skin crawl a bit Ngl. 10 points for horror thrill. Respect.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 07:28 PM
1

No this is a super helpful view of the process for me. I personally don't think it's useless whatsoever you just explained the phenomena really eloquently and accurately imo. The issue imo is that taking the analysis of one groups lived experience and then institutionalizing that model as a core part of our societies educational system is f u c k e d. It could have been any division of consciousness - I love that perspective btw, pulling consciousness from that abyss by hearing what people are s…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 07:26 PM
2

Its super ironic that I'm saying feminist theory is based on useless subjective models and openly admits that it doesn't have to be based in factual reality, yet you're here saying nothing I say is credible because I haven't completed books on the exact same fictitious topic I'm criticizing. Like what would be the point? I can see the effect of it, I understand how it works and that it is seperate from reality and has created fictitious class division between men and women. Why would I read it?
/r/MensRights03/08/23 07:16 PM
2

There is almost 0% that you’ve completed any books on feminist theory Do you not understand the irony of this statement based on what I'm saying? God damn eat some fish or something your brain is regressing. This is a kind of terminally online that from my perspective, seems extremely sad. I appreciate your noble pity toward my suffering state. Can you enlighten me and help me understand?
/r/MensRights03/08/23 07:09 PM
10

It's their own worldview. It doesn't need to be real. That's how people have been taught to think since the 60's now at least, and it's not just women but most people believe "my own worldview and lived experience is the truth". Men understandably are more resilient to this and tend to be objective. But then you remove fathers from homes and their sons adopt the same ideological perspective "my lived experience is the truth", now you have unstable volatile young men and women running around who …
/r/MensRights03/08/23 04:56 PM
3

This is where I get lost between essentialism and whatever else this is. Essentialism is sort of a broad brush and semi accurate. It doesn't account for the individual. But biolgical essentialism has very high statistical prevalence when we test for it. So the idea that men feel rewarded when for example, enacting the code of chivalry as when the Christian/Catholic Orthodox Church held power might have some sort of validity in life satisfaction. But it's clear that there has always been exceptio…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 04:51 PM
6

Np it helps me flush out my own thoughts and create something congruent I go through periods of this regularly lolol. My pleasure if it's helpful
/r/MensRights03/08/23 04:46 PM
8

So arguably men's perspective is that women are in control of everything because we subconsciously want women to be in control of everything? Do you think that's a historically prevalent mindset or an emerging symptom of the last several generations of constant mental bombardment. It's an interesting question because powerful men are often the ones seeking dominatrix etc to take the stress of having to always be in control right. It possible that it might not be able to approach these issues wit…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 04:33 PM
11

Just to be clear, the problem with standpoint theory is that it doesn't encourage objective fact gathering. The slave masters only see their own worldview theoretically and they are the oppressors. The slaves see both their own and the slave masters perspective so presumably they see reality more clearly and should be believed. But this is a basic logical fallacy despite being the blueprint of decades of subjectivism in research. That's why "white privilege" doesn't apply to most of us. We aren'…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 04:04 PM
28

Yes exactly. https://www.liberalcurrents.com/the-limits-of-standpoint-epistemology-for-politics/ This little blog gives a good understanding of the topic I was just reading. So basically, consider the masters of slaves as used here. They had the incentive to view slaves as essentially fitted to those roles and that rigid thought process of essentialism is what has been critcized thoroughly by the standpoint theorists to the extent that is has forced people to believe there is no real essence in …
/r/MensRights03/08/23 03:58 PM
21

To add to that, it's also why affirmative action has made its way in to politics and other areas. For example, it's assumed that if a woman were to be president she would understand the plights of women . Just as the men understand men's issues right??? But this is the logic that is running our world. It's not merit based. In her book Invisible Women, Caroline Criado Perez repeatedly refers to the time Bernie Sanders said: “it’s not enough to say ‘I’m a woman, vote for me.’” This line seemed to …
/r/MensRights03/08/23 03:47 PM
1

I think the benefit of it is in collecting more information by which to make responsible decisions in society and science. Instead of allowing the alternate experience from the mainstream to suffer in silence we should be welcoming those voices in to the mainstream and prioritizing their struggles. That's what equality is but as we all already know that isn't what Standpoint Theory is really about. It never makes the leap to becoming a creative force and wishing to be brought in to the whole, it…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 03:33 PM
76

Nothing rationally is wrong with it at all. It's a Marxist/Hegel slave/master dichotomy built in to western feminist thought and philosophy that divides the world in to oppressor and oppressed. There is no reasoning with it because it is meant to be subjective and to sort reality from the perspective of the oppressed. It's called Standpoint Theory and has been used by Marxist feminists to influence academia for several generations and to brainwash the public. You cannot reason with it. It's of s…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 03:28 PM
2

A few more of the delusional beliefs that seem like they can happen here - The delusion that the "oppressed" fully understand themselves. Therefore they are always right, entitled, etc. The delusion that the "oppressors" don't suffer equally in different ways that can be measured and quantified (therefore the equation is more balanced than the subjects worldview) That those who aren't speaking from lived experience can't have a respectable opinion or observations on the matter, even when using h…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 02:49 PM
5

Since the first wave feminists have been using the "Standpoint Feminism" model to influence college and university level education. The principle being essentially that gender studies and feminism can be taught from womens subjective experience and doesn't have to fit factual reality So it's literally been a fear and violence filled narrative since the very beginning. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standpoint_feminism It's not to say feminism hasn't done a few good things but it did them in the…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 10:44 AM
2

Thank ya. ᕙ⁠(⁠⇀⁠‸⁠↼⁠‶⁠)⁠ᕗ. Now that I think about it it's possible I read it somewhere once a while ago and adopted it myself but I think it's worth repeating because it sums up the situation in an accurate way for sure. So if I did pick it up online hats off to the original anon who said it first lol
/r/MensRights03/08/23 05:37 AM
4

As I've been saying and constantly critcized for, women are the middle management for the elite and they don't even realize it.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 01:09 AM
1

That will literally never happen the entire world will crumble. Women as a group absolutely will not take accountability until something rallies them as a whole. I don't think they are even capable of organizing like that as a group. This problem is completely on men to solve which is why pointing out that feminism is a religious movement, and that it's beneficial of a small group of elites is the most important thing. Understand how it came to be because it's all plain history at this point. Bu…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 01:06 AM
0

I mean they aren't toddlers who don't understand the consequences. No toddlers make decisions based on emotion without fully developed ethics and usually to get attention of adults or mindlessly destroy things, anything to make themselves feel better. Not like women at all.
/r/MensRights03/08/23 01:01 AM
-1

Women are far more susceptible to social pressure than men it's shocking how easily they will fold and change their entire identities to appease the consensus much of the time, especially if you tell them things they want to hear. Truth to women seems often to be simply what makes them feel good, as a group anyway. Intelligent and analytical women exist and they are amazing ofc but we are talking about the average stupid asshole here. Men have their own set of problems when speaking of low intel…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 12:53 AM
3

In all seriousness when it comes to personal survival the laws aren't really that bad if you're self aware and don't act like an idiot. Like there's problems but it's still a ton better than any other points in history it's not like there was ever really a good old days historically, besides the peak of the USA really. Point being with women's narcissim shoved down our throats constantly things seem weirdly unbalanced but if you remove that weird emotional impact from your analysis of the situat…
/r/MensRights03/08/23 12:42 AM
11

It's very much a religious movement and the only ones really benefiting that I can see are politicians and corporate overlords who are able to exploit women's pride and arrogance by gassing them up and pacifying and neutering men at the same time. Women are nothing as a group if not competitive, vain and narcisstic when left to their own devices just as men tend to be somewhat self destructive and chaotic without real meaning or purpose, unless they can conform their personas in to work. Men and…
/r/MensRights02/08/23 11:21 PM
18

Male privilege has never existed without female privilege at the same time. In reality, we share eachothers burdens - women childrearing and managing homes and men shouldering the burden of hard work and politics. Feminism doesn't even understand what Patriarchial societies are and how they all differ in laws and rules and gender roles. These idiots literally believe there's just one universal patriarchy in which women were sublimated in to chattle. It's bizarre how stupid these people are, comp…
/r/MensRights02/08/23 10:56 PM
5

The thing is it's not men you have to tell this too. Lmao. If you're not doing for 90% of the women out here they will roll right by you man they are the ones that aggressively enforce these standards and it isn't ideological it's fuckin biolgical they want that input ------> for the output 🐣 how much more obvious can it be.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 05:02 PM
1

Is that academic or what study is that from? I can't find any source for your source.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 04:49 PM
4

I'll get cancelled for saying this but arguably more respectable too depending on the damn circumstance. Yes I know that is bad to say lol.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 04:36 PM
6

Feminism isn't about equality it's about revenge for a fictional idea that didn't actually even occur as it has been portrayed.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 12:14 PM
5

Simtimus Cucilius
/r/MensRights02/08/23 11:52 AM
9

It's simple. How often do you see women talking about having to educate their husbands or breaking up with boyfriends because he doesn't conform to their world view. Women marry men who don't push back against their ideals. Usually these men have to be pretty oblivious in the first place because marriage is one of the stupidest things a man can do with the laws right now, so it stands to reason those men will be overly conformist and agreeable as well. I think it's better to say that women are t…
/r/MensRights02/08/23 11:24 AM
6

I honestly think it's getting worse because men are just getting more avoidant. At a certain point it's really clear that a lot of these women just want attention and to make men look bad to make themselves feel better. The more you ignore them the less they can use you to prop up their victim complex and inevitably they collapse. There's plenty of attractive kind women in the world too. Just have to divide your attention accordingly.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 11:15 AM
9

Imagine having to become an internationally wanted man just to escape paying alimony to your greedy ex wife.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 10:49 AM
21

Why is this being downvoted? It's important people realize that the courts and the greedy ex wives are both profiting from this, which is why it will never change. Only the men stupid enough to get married will get fucked over and when we stop getting married they will probably double down on other laws like common law etc to make sure they get their money either way. You think women are going to stand up for men at their own expense? LOL.
/r/MensRights02/08/23 10:46 AM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights02/08/23 08:15 AM
8

It's all about money. Women vote more than men and spend a fuck ton more money than men. In the early 1900s we were about 200 years after the industrial revolution and the beginning of globalization. Women represent an entire slave caste unutilized. They also happen to be the most agreeable and susceptible to in group bias. The powers that be figured out during the 50's and 60's through direct experience that women are super susceptible to media and advertising. Giving women the right to vote en…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 10:54 PM
1

ChatGPT is very safety oriented but still gives up good data. For example, I asked it about historical Patriarchial systems and to name 10 different ones. Two of the ones it named were Rome and feudal Japanese systems. So I asked it to go in to detail about how they functioned as Patriarchial systems and what roles and advantages and disadvantages women and men had in each. As I went through and did the other CHATGPT managed to explain the general theme and understand my overarching question by …
/r/MensRights01/08/23 11:58 AM
1

Idk I wasn't talking about you I was talking about me. I think you misunderstood. I was using ChatGPT to filter data because you can ask it to go in to high detail after it gives generalizations and when I did so on this specific area it said the same thing, which is that there aren't any real laws but moreso just weak barriers of discrimination which supports what you said here.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 11:46 AM
4

What could possibly be the benefit of demascilinzing the warrior class, eliminating male virtue and gassing up the gender more prone to in group bias and solipsism with financial incentive to hurt the other gender , who also happens to make the majority of consumer buying decisions and votes more. Hmmmm. Who benefits I wonder. People get pissed at me or just laugh when I say women are playing middle management to the elite without realizing it but this is exactly what I mean. It's not a joke and…
/r/MensRights01/08/23 11:25 AM
1

Lately when I read some comments I just yell at my phone "shut the fuck up" instead of arguing with the commentor and it works better honestly. Thank you for letting me practice.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 11:22 AM
3

I was speaking about this with Chat Gippity and it said the exact same thing lol. Nice.
/r/MensRights01/08/23 11:15 AM
2

Hunting a mammoth together would be great first date material. Gonna write that down.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/23 05:08 PM
1

Nice.
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates31/07/23 05:05 PM
2

Every time homie haha.
/r/MensRights31/07/23 03:54 PM
1

I'll jump in. If feminism was about equality it wouldn't blame men. That's something I realized lately and it's maybe a boring and anti climactic realization but if you look at the trajectory of the last few generations it's become very clear that men have fallen behind and yet still feminism pushes on. If you look at the roots of feminism it is very clearly in anti-male sentiment. That men are the problem. Take this statement and really think about it for a second " Men created a Patriarchy to …
/r/MensRights31/07/23 12:22 PM
1

Correct but also incorrect homie. Barbie is a movie made by women who have been culturally brainwashed by the wealthiest families in the world through a cultural revolution (we know as feminism) for the last several generations. The reality of a female dominated society is very intentional in part to do with population control, cultural and value assimilation/dissolution and the obvious, complete economic control. A female dominated society with weak men is the ideal corporate landscape for reas…
/r/MensRights31/07/23 12:12 PM
7

you're assuming women need or want a man I'm married (⁠ꏿ⁠﹏⁠ꏿ⁠;⁠) lucky guy
/r/MensRights31/07/23 12:06 PM
1

Male orgasm is fuckin dumb and anticlimactic imo.
/r/MensRights31/07/23 11:51 AM
2

She must have been really fucking hot.
/r/MensRights31/07/23 11:44 AM
20

"how do you debate someone who doesn't even know their own argument"
/r/MensRights31/07/23 11:35 AM
2

All this bullshit was created to divide men and women and break down homes. Ironically, women and the world needs good men now more than ever. The real evil is those doing this. Women need men to see the truth and stand together against the real evil, which is those who have control. It will involve pissing some women off because they won't get their shiny things but that's ok.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 06:58 PM
3

Exactly. Which is the same purpose as the gender politics and feminism already.
/r/MensRights29/07/23 06:43 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter