Standpoint Feminism

Education is one of the only ways to change people's minds en masse. I remember when the US pulled out of Afghanistan they left a bunch of western things behind including bumper cars, gym equipment and other novel things that the Taliban fighters had never seen before. Surprisingly to me at the time videos and pictures surfaced of them playing and interacting with all these things almost like children.

The suffocating of curiosity and knowledge is one of the first things that happens during any religious take over. Imagine if you could place religion in educational institutions and call it history? Imagine if everyone around you believed it to be true. It seemed to be true anyway, and it's not something you've really had the time to think through as you go about your life.

The funny thing about beliefs is that contrary to what we like to think, we don't know what we believe until we are showed we believe it. This is fundamental struggle of being human that we underestimate. It's so easy for us to feel right when we don't know we are wrong.

There is always a constant doubt when pursuing truth which is why the loudest and most obnoxious tend to get their voices heard.

As far as advocating for men's rights I believe in fighting the beliefs which allow men to be treated poorly. The main perpetrator that casts a dark shadow on history is Feminism. Seeing the word written amongst other religions doesn't even phase me anymore.

To me there is almost no point debating individuals on men's rights because they are zealots. It's like trying to convert people from one religion to another in their eyes, even if it's not the case it feels like a cultural violation to them and like it's pulling them from the group.

We are bombarded with information all the time that sinks in and becomes a mantra. The more the mantra is repeated the more people believe it. This is one of the more effective ways people get conditioned.

This is why I draw attention to certain key areas of Feminism that expose the invalid nature of it from a very base level. One of the most indisputable aspects of Feminism which is simply accepted among academics is the Standpoint Feminism principle which was weasled in to academic circles as early as the 1950's.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standpoint_feminism

Dorothy Smith, teaching at University of California, Berkeley, when the women's movement was in its early stages, looked at the experience of female academics and began to ask about life stories of these women. As a feminist inspired by Karl Marx, Smith turned her attention to the development of "a sociology for women". She founded feminist standpoint theory, which looked at the social world from the perspectives of women in their everyday worlds and the ways in which women socially construct their worlds.[3] As theorized by Nancy Hartsock in 1983, standpoint feminism is founded in Marxism

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dorothy_E._Smith

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nancy_Hartsock

Hartsock was a feminist philosopher. She was known for her work in feminist epistemology and standpoint theory, especially the 1983 essay "The Feminist Standpoint",[3] which also integrated Melanie Klein's theories on psychoanalysis and the Oedipal crisis. Her standpoint theory derived from Marxism, which claims that the proletariat has a distinctive perspective on social relations and that only this perspective reveals the truth. She drew an analogy between the industrial labor of the proletariat and the domestic labor of women to show that women can also have a distinctive standpoint.

What does this actually mean for Feminism?

Essentially, pseudo intellectual Marxists managed to create an admittedly false paradigm through which they could shape the minds and educations of young people in to a subjective measurement of history through the eyes of a "disadvantaged group", as per in Marxism there always has to be a power dynamic at play wherein one is the victim or exploited and one is the oppressor.

Yet the most accurate interpretation of history would be that men and women were both very oppressed and exploited. The working class of men rarely owned significant land and women were often allowed to own land, sign contracts and run business.

In reality, patriarchal systems did exist much more frequently than matriarchal ones, but these were logical agreements created by traditional gender roles.

In Rome, Greece, France, Italy, England, etc. Patriarchial society's thrived with mostly men in politics and higher intellectual circles but women still often participated except that these were exceptional women. Sometimes authors or poets, women who contributed something and who the men respected because of it.

As in places like Greece and Rome, women had the ear and often the balls of politically powerful husbands, were able to participate in academics if they wished and often held powerful positions in religious environments/ritualistic practices. Culturally women have rarely had problems securing power and rarely had to worry about security alone because the man had a strong incentive to work and provide for her and his children. He would die if he didn't work. If she didn't have children and raise them she had to do something else....is it any surprise that the majority of women chose to stay at home and have children, work with familial support networks and focus on educating their children and teaching them how to survive in the world? Mothers intelligence was extremely important because their competence ensured social survival of their children.

The French revolution was an important turning point for all under classes. It's not like men lived the easy life while women were shut in as slaves pumping out babies. Yet this is what the proto feminists - Marxist ideologically driven haggard looking femcels, have wedged in to academia for decades.

They are very open and comfortable admitting that yes it's true - Feminism, women's studies, gender studies - the things we now teach our children in school - is subjective. It doesn't have to be factually accurate. It can be emotionally driven. It's how I choose to see it or how I think a group of people should see it. That's reality.

But that isn't reality and now we are all suffering due to these cultural lies.

Feminism is NOT based on reality and I encourage anyone who deals with feminists regularly to do the logical thing - bludgeon them with the reality of "Standpoint Feminism".

Mention it as often as possible to bring awareness to it. That nothing they are taught is actually true, that it's by nature subjective and emotional and selfish and deluded, created by haggard unwanted femcels who couldn't hack it anywhere else in society so they decided to punish men under the guise of social justice.

Standpoint Feminism is important to understand and the more people that know about it the better. It undermines all the different forms of feminism, all the beliefs inherent,

Feminism itself is based on NOTHING but the subjective resentment of a few hateful people being spread like a mind virus to everyone else. It's religion filled with dogma. Understand and emphasize the root of it and cut out the weed from the root. Stop hacking at the surface when it's so easy to stop it from regrowing with enough focus on the right aspects.

Peace and love people.