TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Imaginary-Luck-8671 Archive

View 1 posts and 556 comments by Imaginary-Luck-8671 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
14

Clearly a troll, they showed up here to hurl more abuse and they've already deleted their account. I'm sure the bitch will be back with another anon in a few days
/r/MensRights27/07/22 10:24 PM
7

Well we didn't exactly need a window, those cunts are all over the place Nice to not have to leave this thread to see the crazy tho. Saves so much effort
/r/MensRights27/07/22 10:23 PM
7

If only that were true
/r/MensRights27/07/22 10:21 PM
3

I mean, clearly based on her comments ITT
/r/MensRights27/07/22 10:20 PM
11

Everyone make sure to give her the respect she deserves! You can determine that level by checking out some of her comments (and if you read this, go fuck yourself cunt)
/r/MensRights27/07/22 10:20 PM
11

If you want an example of feminist delusion and double talk, don't even have to leave this thread sowilostar and her friends her already tossing out slurs left and right, alongside their incel level rants
/r/MensRights27/07/22 10:19 PM
4

They're already here
/r/MensRights27/07/22 10:18 PM
9

scrote Your terminology suggests otherwise Also you very much just proved his point. gtfo
/r/MensRights27/07/22 09:59 PM
1

fucking LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOL you were just looking for a "OH YOU SUPPORT TRUMP, I DON'T HAVE TO LISTEN ANYMORE" As if people are fans of that asshole. I'd probably enjoy his company more than yours, tho, given this conversation and how completely deluded you are. I mean, ffs, you asked for an explanation and then dismissed it with a worse version of the quippy attitude you were whining about!
/r/MensRights27/07/22 09:52 PM
1

If you think that's always been the case, you're probably a younger person who hasn't been politically conscious long enough to experience anything but. No judgement though Ironic statement is ironic Just if you disagree with me, then say so and follow it up with reasons why. Give me an argument. ... i did say so, and the reasons are because this has been happening for much longer than that (showing your age) Identity politics have been a thing for a while, and have been increasingly ramping up …
/r/MensRights27/07/22 08:03 PM
1

He said out-group men As in, a black feminist doesn't have as much misandry for a black man as a white man, because the black man is in her racial in-group
/r/MensRights26/07/22 10:12 PM
37

Abortion is just the latest excuse for manhating
/r/MensRights26/07/22 07:38 PM
7

Just because a man isn't attractive doesn't automatically make him a "loser Thats exactly what they want people to think, though. That if you don't have an active female nanny, you must be too anti women to have one. It's an explicit extension of something we talk about a lot: men are treated differently once it's clear a woman approves of them.
/r/MensRights26/07/22 06:25 PM
8

And they don't want to. In their mind, those are all the same thing: The Enemy
/r/MensRights26/07/22 06:21 PM
7

Poo break
/r/MensRights26/07/22 06:20 PM
10

I still don't understand how people conflate an incel with a woman hater They haven't succeeded yet, but they're trying. It's the next step of the euphamism treadmill. 1950's: "Coward" "Yellow bellied" 1990's: "Loser" "Virgin" 2010's: "Misogynist" 2020: "Incel" It's all about the propaganda to control the behavior of men to women's benefit
/r/MensRights26/07/22 06:19 PM
4

It’s incredibly generous of you to think this started because of trump, and wasn’t always this way
/r/MensRights26/07/22 02:32 PM
1

It still happens to men in female dominated industries, just in different ways. It is less often due to things like gender quotas
/r/MensRights26/07/22 04:15 AM
6

If you look into the history a bit, most of the draft dodging issues were pushed by women The white feather campaign, for example. Young women encouraged to carry white feathers and publicly shame men for not being in the war or wearing uniforms. Caused some young men who were disqualified from fighting during the world wars to commit suicide.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 09:37 PM
9

Unlikely so long as one gender isn't facing any consequences for voting the other to their deaths
/r/MensRights25/07/22 09:32 PM
11

Not just manipulative, actively harmful. The rebranding of domestic violence as "Violence against women" erases male victims on purpose. And it was feminists that got the female genital mutilation ban put into place in the west, so it's really thanks to them that 7/10 men in the states have been sexually abused by their caregives and doctors, and get a reminder of it every time they take a piss
/r/MensRights25/07/22 09:30 PM
10

Whats worse is even if women were drafted, there would still be sexism because more women would be given safe support positions. But sexists won't even let it get to that point
/r/MensRights25/07/22 09:27 PM
16

Putting it lightly. But again, tip of the iceberg. War in Ukraine: men not allowed to leave, forced to fight Men are considered enemy combatants by default, so it doesn't matter what you did, if you have a dick you're shoot worthy "Women are the true victims of war. We lose our sons, husbands, and fathers" - Hilary Clinton Just listen to any report on any war and you can hear the sexism: "X deaths, including Y women and children" - what a convenient way to not mention how many men are being kill…
/r/MensRights25/07/22 09:25 PM
21

Boko Haram, too. The entire "Bring back our girls" bullshit was just his latest attempt at media attention. The first one was an all boys school, and he killed them all. crickets Then the second one, all boys school, and he buried them all alive. crickets Wasn't until girls might have sex they didn't want to have that suddenly everybody gave a shit. /u/EricAllonde says it much better
/r/MensRights25/07/22 09:19 PM
5

You can't solve racism/sexism by being more racist/sexist, just in a different way. We've had decades of affirmative action with very poor results, often because both the chosen candidate and their peers have that looming shadow of "this person didn't get in on merit" casting a pall over all their interactions. Not saying all other people in college did get there on merit, but they have more plausible deniability so they are better able to ignore the feeling. If you really wanted to solve racism…
/r/MensRights25/07/22 05:03 PM
6

I disagree. Men with self respect and talent will go off to places where they are appreciated, and all the companies will be left with are spineless yes men with no talent And guess who really hates spineless yes men with no talent? (hint: it's women) And what do you think happens when those two populations interact? (hint: sexual harassment complaints, which cost the company money)
/r/MensRights25/07/22 04:59 PM
3

https://uwspace.uwaterloo.ca/handle/10012/6958 This study is on benevolent sexism (i.e., treating women better because they're women), HS stands for Hostile Sexism The low BS male target (compared to high BS male target) was judged to be higher on HS, less supportive of female professionals, less good of father and husband, and more likely to perpetrate domestic violence. Ratings of the low BS male target were as equally negative as those of the high HS male target It means women consider a man …
/r/MensRights25/07/22 04:46 PM
4

People up top are panicking about it, too. Like everyone is up in arms about RvW being overturned in the states, but anyone notice how when overpopulation was the critical issue, RvW created a new law out of nowhere, and now that declining birthrates might affect the economy, RvW is out the door? People attribute it to misogyny, but imo it's clearly the establishment reacting to the breakdown of gender relations and what that means for the establishment.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 04:26 PM
14

will As in, in the future? As in, hasn't already and been gradually increasing in it's effect for 50 or so years? I think you have a very optimistic world view. Kudos.
/r/MensRights25/07/22 03:57 PM
2

Yeah, that they immediately jump to "All those women were raped and then not believed, our justice system is broken!" speaks volumes
/r/MensRights25/07/22 03:55 PM
2

Or if you get something out of it, like half of a famous movie actor's money
/r/MensRights25/07/22 03:53 PM
6

How, when it's entirely based on a womans feelings, both before and after the event? If you decide to accuse someone of rape because they don't make as much money as you thought, you don't deserve to be believed. And yet this has not only happened, but has also been codified into law in some countries. India, for example, considers deception around income to count as rape. Whereas deception from the woman in getting sex isn't criminalized anywhere, and men in most countries can't even get being …
/r/MensRights25/07/22 03:50 PM
27

Thats been legitimately studied. Women consider being treated in the same way that a man is treated as oppression. They want to get the same results without any extra effort/work, that's their "equality"
/r/MensRights25/07/22 03:30 PM
7

oh look! A random completely unsupported excuse popped right out of your ass! Lets get that back up in there, right where it belongs.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 11:20 PM
6

And to other people, they are intrinsically related and you can't have equality in some areas and not in others For example, Women have equality in voting but not in draft representation. This changes their voting patterns because they do not bear the risk of going to war. The same is true in dating. If women initiated more and carried their weight in dating, many of men's issues such as automatic assumptions of being a predator or the provider expectation would lessen.
/r/MensRights23/07/22 11:18 PM
3

I even found one! ^
/r/MensRights22/07/22 10:20 PM
4

I would not. He's trying to pull people into a judeo-christian framework more than anything else, and especially if you're a woman. I haven't seen much in the hours i've watched/read of him that describes woman outside of that traditional box. He doesn't want them "barefoot and pregnant", but the most he'll really say on it (going from his youtube recordings of university lectures) is women are rooted in "chaos" and they have their life plan "basically already set out for them". I would say it's…
/r/MensRights22/07/22 08:07 PM
3

People can't learn new information and change? News to me.
/r/MensRights22/07/22 07:25 PM
3

Still waiting for the bullshit reveals to end, and i'm in my 30's... I used to think doctors were all about helping the patient, then i grew up. I used to think democrats helped the poor/disadvantaged, then i grew up. I used to think the military protected the country from invaders, then i grew up. I used to think the CIA was about protecting America, then i grew up. on and on and on and on....
/r/MensRights22/07/22 07:22 PM
22

It also completely ignores the forms of violence women typically engage in: Reputation destruction, character assassination, gaslighting, gossiping, defamation, slander, etc. All forms of social violence that have been amplified by modern technology and especially the internet. It also generally ignores that women will use these forms of social violence to coerce men into enacting physical violence on the woman's behalf. Every man who was blackmailed/brainwashed into doing something counts again…
/r/MensRights22/07/22 07:14 PM
0

you can't sink to their level oh looks like i just did! Not only does that make you a hypocrite but a terrible person When fighting against terrible people, you have to be a terrible person. Taking the high road isn't a path to victory, it's how to keep getting taken advantage of. This will only backfire on the mens rights community and encourage more women to justify their actions. Huh. Seems like it hasn't harmed feminism that much, back when we were pointing out how sexist it was before fight…
/r/MensRights22/07/22 07:07 PM
2

I feel the same way when men do it, tbh What do they want? A cookie for all the female attention they've gotten? please...
/r/MensRights22/07/22 05:12 PM
0

As we've learned, people only give a shit when something starts to affect women. When women get social condemnation for all their dick jokes, "compensating for something", "big dick energy" and all that shit, i'll stop talking about their fishy axe wounds
/r/MensRights22/07/22 05:10 PM
1

No ones genitals are all that attractive. Men make those beef curtains attractive because we like what they're attached to. As the body shaming against men has increased and become more culturally acceptable, men realized generally women don't extent this same courtesy to men, and so now, yeah, beef curtains is how they're referenced It's only as insulting as "smol dick energy" or "big dick energy" Doesn't necessarily mean that man is saying something negative about your axe wound
/r/MensRights22/07/22 05:08 PM
2

He must have missed his white feather
/r/MensRights22/07/22 05:00 PM
1

To be fair, most KKK members aren't that extreme. The problem is the extremist racist KKK members get lumped into the same group as the ones who only want legal privileges for white people. They are all under the camp of "The KKK" but we don't, as a society, call these other types of KKK members "racists" or "racial extremists" when we really should. It doesn't matter what your intentions are, if you're supporting/part of a hate group to advance your aims, you are responsible for the actions of …
/r/MensRights22/07/22 04:57 PM
1

I disagree, he has a very religious agenda, just from a i-went-to-college-so-i-know-this-is-bullshit-but-im-going-to-justify-it-anyway kind of way
/r/MensRights22/07/22 04:08 PM
1

I would love to get some Slavoj links if you have some
/r/MensRights22/07/22 04:01 PM
5

I used to like jordan, until i got enough into his stuff to realize how much he was bending backwards to justify religious practices. He advocates for "rights of initiation" to turn "boys into men". That language is just cult indoctrination cover for abuse, generally sexual abuse, and you only have to get about a third of the way into Maps of Meaning before he's using things like male genital mutilation as an example of how to "become a man". The mutilation is meant to damage the brain, similarl…
/r/MensRights22/07/22 04:00 PM
7

Yeah she has a tedx talk where she goes over how her 'friends' turned on her, entire places she'd worked with stopped taking her calls, and then the verbal harassment started... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3WMuzhQXJoY
/r/MensRights22/07/22 03:50 PM
28

Which is why the only way forward is to make it a problem for society, until society gets the hint and starts giving a shit, if only to save itself. #MGTOW
/r/MensRights20/07/22 04:54 PM
29

True, but many positions in stem are promoted to management over stem, and those are the cushy ones. The ones that are technically in stem, but really just managing stem
/r/MensRights20/07/22 12:45 AM
9

Putting on pajamas, fulfilling your life goals, and having someone else take care of all your needs and pay your bills. That's a woman's version of "shit job", no joke. They consider that to be oppression.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 10:45 PM
2

We've been demoted from tools to tissues /s
/r/MensRights19/07/22 10:42 PM
37

Women consider staying home, fulfilling their life goals, and having someone else care for all their needs to be their "shit job" In their solipsistic minds, they're already on the floor.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 10:41 PM
101

They don't apply for the cushy stem ones, either, but we're still forced to pick from the available pool of incompetents Why does construction get a pass on shitty hiring requirements? /s
/r/MensRights19/07/22 10:39 PM
1

They're not all like that, and i'm going through that latest one i posted just to back up what i say, and she is doing better the later she goes (a tiny bit). She still does it tho, even when she's trying to backtrack and not seem like a feminist (despite being very feminist) Pearls other guests are easier to listen to Edit: Cut that episode halfway through when bitch literally started yelling "LALALALALALALA" when the other guy tried talking. Her hypocrisy is astounding.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 06:21 PM
13

Maybe at some point women will actually notice their blatant sexism like this. I won't be holding my breath, tho (feminism is 100% projection)
/r/MensRights19/07/22 06:02 PM
2

The one that talks over everybody else when they start saying things she doesn't like, and then when they complain about being interrupted she screams "DONT TALK OVER ME" If called out i'd expect a smug look of "i'm a piece of shit who thinks this is sticking it to the man" type of face That bitch. Edit: This bitch: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mTZ8d-ttYIE Blonde hair I can't even watch episodes with her in them, she's so insufferable to listen to. Feel bad for any of her SO's, tbh.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 05:53 PM
0

You're right that there are a boatload of shit to deal with after the fact, but that doesn't negate the bullshit that comes before. The unattractive or unconfident guys you mention is an example of survivor-ship bias. You're skipping over all the members of those populations that weren't successful and were instead punished or criminalized.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 05:51 PM
2

You’re not reading the room well if you categorize all of your interactions with women as creepy. or women's thinking of things as "creepy" is what is wrong in the first place
/r/MensRights19/07/22 05:19 PM
2

All the lies from women/mothers about it don't help, either. "Just be yourself!" that didn't work "Be a better version of yourself!" So...be someone different but pretend it's myself? "No no no, you have to be the exact bullshit she made up in her mind, then read her mind to get that image, then turn yourself into that, and pretend it's who you were all along! And don't forget to thank women for helping you along the way!" The game is rigged, and men should stop playing until it's been fixed.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 05:16 PM
3

The worse part is women are happy that this risk exists. They (falsely) believe it protects them from 'creeps', and selects for men 'brave' enough to approach them anyway despite the risk. They don't have the self awareness to realize the creeps are the ones who ignore the risk
/r/MensRights19/07/22 04:58 PM
12

They're the new words off the euphemism treadmill for "loser", "virgin", or "guy who has trouble with women" Society often uses women's perceptions of a man to determine his value, and want those deemed "unworthy" to shut up and stay in their box. Those that complain about the box and ask how to get out get labelled "incels" and "misogynists" or whatever other slur society comes up with. "inceldom" in this case is this man buying into the terminology to describe his situation.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 04:52 PM
36

The shocked pickachu face when men walk away, tho Priceless. "Wait you can't do that! You either live up to my absurd expectations or you're a loser people are encouraged to abuse, THERE ARE NO OTHER OPTIONS"
/r/MensRights19/07/22 04:45 PM
7

A little too respectful, imo. She doesn't challenge women she just repeats what men online have said. I would prefer she grew a bit more of a backbone on her own show (particularly with that feminist with the dyed blond hair plastered on her head, so annoying to listen to and it detracts from the show because Pearl won't keep her in line.)
/r/MensRights19/07/22 04:15 PM
11

This, tbh. Tho she also lets her guests run the show way more than she should, feminists in particular.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 04:13 PM
5

I've watched quite a bit of her channel. She's pretty pro-conservative and anti-liberal, as opposed to pro-truth. Sounds like she gets most of her info from Fresh and Fit, which has about a 30% accuracy rate and is mostly repeating the same points episode after episode. It's interesting to hear her chats, but she's really just regurgitating content found here or more on PUA youtube channels, rather than meaningfully adding to the conversation. She also puts up with way more BS from her female gu…
/r/MensRights19/07/22 04:13 PM
6

don't use 'creeps', it's just a slur against men women don't like for basically any reason. Including being vulnerable while making a compliment
/r/MensRights18/07/22 10:19 PM
9

That doesn't mean she isn't thinking that. It isn't about you dating, your opinion of her is a reflection of her status (in her mind) So if she doesn't find you attractive, and you make a comment that implies you do find her attractive, she's going to think you think she's in your league, and lash out to "put you in your place", i.e. "How dare you think you are good enough to be allowed to even think of me sexually" She's protecting her own inflated ego, whether you're dating or not. Or she's tr…
/r/MensRights18/07/22 09:57 PM
1

Worse than a corpse. A corpse can't work and advocate against you, like feminists often do
/r/MensRights18/07/22 04:39 PM
7

I will when they stop acting like bitches, en mass (speaking of perfect examples, btw)
/r/MensRights18/07/22 04:30 PM
7

Women are not better able to multitask. In fact, the idea of multitasking is a myth. That's not how our brains work. And lets be real here, men focus harder because the shit men have to do is harder and requires more focus. Child rearing may be tiring, that doesn't make it difficult, certainly not when compared to taking down large prey to drag home.
/r/MensRights18/07/22 04:14 PM
3

Oh they can have interests, it's just those interests have to be benefiting a woman in some way Gardening? GTFO Gardening roses for your SO because she doesn't like the exploitation of migrant workers? YOU GO BOI It's the stupid bullshit where anything a man does is automatically bad unless they can draw a mental path to how it benefits them personally (men, too). Unfortunately, how stupid they are changes how long that path is, so you've got some nuckledragger women judging men for doing anythi…
/r/MensRights18/07/22 03:37 PM
26

Oh look! someone who is incapable of holding women accountable for anything, and instead blames men to avoid any critical thought! Get your popcorn guys
/r/MensRights18/07/22 03:06 PM
13

Those oil barons aren't the ones pushing men out the door. We have to deal with their manipulated harpies who for some insane reason have been given unrestricted dominion over our children. How you think all these simps are created in the first place?
/r/MensRights17/07/22 07:44 PM
2

They made a religion instead of competent leadership, and got all the nonsense that comes with the cult
/r/MensRights17/07/22 03:15 PM
2

like 1 in 3 being sexually assaulted at some point in their lives and the fact that they are generally still far underrepresented in political bodies 7 out of 10 men have been sexually assaulted and permanently scarred by it in the US, with the consent of their mothers. So that 1 in 3 (which is also a doctored stat, it isn't that high for women) is kinda a bullshit distraction from any actual issue
/r/MensRights15/07/22 12:25 AM
3

Yeah, they want to get pregnant by traditionally masculine men they say they hate, and then get taken care of by the most submissive man they can abuse into existence.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 12:12 AM
2

"Equality feels like oppression" is projection from feminists It's women who consider being treated as a man to be discrimination and misogyny, men who are treated with the privileges of women don't generally complain about it.
/r/MensRights14/07/22 11:53 PM
10

maybe they shouldn't point guns at people then Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 08:22 PM
8

I'm ok with being an abuser in this situation
/r/MensRights13/07/22 08:16 PM
8

How is choosing to punish your husband for a federal decision "worthwhile intent"? First, you're using sex as a weapon. Using it to coerce their husbands into something Second, they're ignoring their SO as a person, and instead treating them as responsible for any and everything they can rationalize as 'men's' fault, despite the abortion debate being split among women and women being primary voters Third, they are stressing and possibly ending their relationships over political bullshit that has…
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:46 PM
22

Blaming and punishing their significant other for every perceived slight against women that happens in the world? Nah, what could go wrong?
/r/MensRights13/07/22 02:42 PM
8

I prefer calling it Fat Bitch energy
/r/MensRights12/07/22 11:38 PM
2

i thought it was -128%?
/r/MensRights12/07/22 08:33 PM
2

exactly If the hatred is justified, so is anything she does to "even the score" Including but not limited to: cheating false accusations spreading your personal info around her friends and mocking you for it poisoning you (sneaking estrogen into your food counts as poisoning, all she has to do is double her Pill usage) physically assaulting you mutilating you based on imagined slights murdering you and then claiming abuse Seriously OP, FUCKING RUN There is no way that pussy is worth the risk
/r/MensRights12/07/22 08:30 PM
1

Say you don't date bigots, hand her a dyed pink KKK hat, and kick her the fuck out
/r/MensRights12/07/22 08:21 PM
3

because they'll be jailed (legally) Every "draft dodger" was protesting the selective service. All the other people are 18 just trying to get into school Also, notice how the draft stops affecting people old enough to know it's wrong and do something about it? Not a coincidence.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 09:55 PM
2

HOW NO ONE GIVES A SHIT AND THEY HAVE READY LABELS TO COMPLETELY INVALIDATE YOUR OPINION
/r/MensRights11/07/22 09:52 PM
5

In this day and age speaking up is a way to lose your job and livilihood, and since we also don't have any social safety nets for men, male protestors of male issues will generally just wind up on the street, where they will be ignored even harder
/r/MensRights11/07/22 09:51 PM
1

We can't even get legal protections on our genitals like girls have, what do you expect? We have protestors out there with blood stained pants, trying to explain to people that torturing an infant's genitals is bad and failing This bullshit isn't even top 3 of the shit that gets ignored just because the victims are men, i dunno how you're surprised tbh
/r/MensRights11/07/22 09:49 PM
13

The real reason is we need to spread awareness and keep this on peoples minds so it doesn’t get swept under the rug. They will try to get people to forget it and then let them off scot free. That’s why we need the attention on it now
/r/MensRights10/07/22 05:31 PM
5

Neither I, nor any male I’ve personally witnessed, has ever spoken so disrespectfully about women. I might call them bitches and cunts, but that’s due to their behavior, not any type of body shaming or comments on the smell
/r/MensRights10/07/22 03:49 AM
3

This tbh
/r/MensRights08/07/22 04:05 PM
1

Because you said you’d be downvoted specifically for disagreeing with him When you didn’t disagree with anything. You couldn’t have, because you didn’t bring up anything Peterson preaches about. You just made a comment with petersons name and said “BRING THE DOWNVOTES!”, clearly indicating you’re full of shit and just here to troll, because your comment didn’t have a valid argument or logic to debate at all
/r/MensRights08/07/22 04:03 PM
1

Humanity. We all depend on you growing up at some point in your life
/r/MensRights08/07/22 04:01 PM
2

You used western men, and then clearly switched to “all” women to make his comment easier to attack It’s bitch arguing and immediately shows you have no real arguments, just a whole bunch of bitching to do
/r/MensRights08/07/22 04:01 PM
1

The missing extra characters from when the cats jump on the keyboard
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:54 PM
2

After you intentionally twisted the aforementioned groups to support your point, then accused him of doing that to cover for your obvious doing of that Like you’re doing again
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:52 PM
0

Your welcome! If your try really hard, someday you might be able to make arguments all on your own! We hope, anyway
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:51 PM
2

The obvious negative response you were expecting had nothing to do with Peterson, and you know it You only brought Peterson up to deflect the blame of the negative response into that to protect your ego from your actual points being complete bullshit Go back to feminist camp, tell them you failed manipulation training
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:49 PM
9

Saying “I disavow this” is about as helpful as “IGNORE THE OBVIOUS BIGOTRY FEMINISM IS THE BEST” You’ve added nothing, and disavowed nothing, because you haven’t condemned any specific behavior All you’ve done is “oh, not real feminists (yes they are)” and wrongly thought that was enough
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:44 PM
4

🤣🤣
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:41 PM
3

Plus so many of them proudly admitting to it
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:40 PM
4

He did answer, but thanks for identifying the thing you were doing for us!
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:32 PM
0

I highly doubt you could even state one of petersons points without looking it up first Which means your entire position is just ego validation and “pick me!” Attitude So who you trying to get laid by? I hope she’s at least cute, to degrade yourself like this with no real points or arguments.
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:28 PM
2

I’m downvoting you for being an idiot What did you say that disagreed with Peterson? He’s got his head pretty far up his ass, too, but you didn’t disagree with him at all in this comment Sound more like you were preempting the obvious negative response you were going to get for your bullshit
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:27 PM
8

I believe the feminist lingo is “internalized misandry”
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:22 PM
45

I disagree I don’t think they’re capable of anything better, that’s why they’re such miserable cunts who drag men down as the only source of their self esteem
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:16 PM
7

misandrist attitudes ~push~ abuse men to try harder FTFY
/r/MensRights07/07/22 05:08 PM
3

Bathing in the blood of virgins They just couldn’t find any cheap female ones, so they make due
/r/MensRights07/07/22 03:59 PM
1

This is a weak man who has convinced himself he has to put himself above others to have any worth The indoctrination he is spouting is 1) wrong and 2) actively harmful to himself and others. No it’s not “toxic masculinity”, it’s women rewarding this behavior and punishing pro social behavior, because women want the most useful tool they can get their mits on
/r/MensRights07/07/22 03:16 PM
5

Same, just “hate speech” and “ya banned!” Think it was some thigh-beard getting off on being able to silence people who speak truths xer wants to pretend aren’t true. Like that feminists are mentally retarded, by medical definition
/r/MensRights07/07/22 01:42 PM
0

Hey me too! And for one of the tamest things I’ve said
/r/MensRights07/07/22 01:39 PM
7

If you’d read my comment you’d know I was commenting on your last line Indicating that I had, in fact, read your comment and made the big boy decision to write my comment out afterward. Nice deflection tho, 6/10 at least
/r/MensRights07/07/22 03:32 AM
64

Those are excuses. It’s about controlling mens sexuality and psychologically damaging them to be more compliant, same as FGM is for women
/r/MensRights06/07/22 09:48 PM
13

Funny how it seems to come from both sides, almost if both sides treat men as mules who only exist to solve problems for women
/r/MensRights06/07/22 08:11 PM
8

You’re SOOOOO right. All those raped men should just change themselves so their trauma isn’t bothering anyone else, all that whining about being left out of victims resources just distracts from the issues /s Maybe you should stop whining and actually do something?
/r/MensRights06/07/22 08:09 PM
4

You answered your own question It doesn’t benefit women
/r/MensRights03/07/22 02:36 PM
1

And then all the talks and "jokes" about forcing vasectomies onto guys... it's disgusting
/r/MensRights01/07/22 07:20 PM
23

Misandry is normalized and applauded
/r/MensRights01/07/22 07:03 PM
6

Exactly. Even rapists get love letters in jail.
/r/MensRights01/07/22 01:00 AM
30

Oh "creep" does mean something, it means a woman didn't like you at any point in time, and that's a crime (somehow)
/r/MensRights30/06/22 10:37 PM
3

The societal support for it sure does
/r/MensRights30/06/22 05:00 PM
3

I'm not going to do the work for you of teaching you how the world works, you don't pay me enough for that. But yes, your unfounded anecdotes are just as worthless as mine
/r/MensRights30/06/22 04:20 PM
6

I presented as many as you did. And thats all you're gonna get.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 04:01 PM
6

Thats why we use stats and data, because anecdotes are basically worthless. Try it sometime, instead of just finding the things that confirm your previous worldview.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 03:59 PM
10

Each of those men started out under the power of a woman So generous of you to discount their ability to influence young and vulnerable minds for their own benefit. Or maybe convenient is the word I’m looking for
/r/MensRights30/06/22 04:17 AM
20

Or people are becoming more cognizant of very common behaviors and using appropriate names for them. You haven’t pointed out any incorrect usage, just frequent. Frequent accurate usage builds meaning
/r/MensRights30/06/22 04:06 AM
4

Exactly, just how guys don't owe women financial support in any circumstance
/r/MensRights29/06/22 10:08 PM
6

The funny part is this is exactly what using sex as a weapon means, and now it's large scale and pushed publically
/r/MensRights29/06/22 10:07 PM
10

Exactly, one step above the murdering mothers!
/r/MensRights29/06/22 02:26 PM
4

and tries to defend it "You need chaos and order! Order is the masculine, you do all the work and keep the chaos contained until she finds something better"
/r/MensRights29/06/22 01:45 PM
1

Looks like someone knows fuck all about vasectomies I do disagree with that. Rapists aren’t deserving of war crimes, especially something far worse than their crime.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 03:51 AM
6

It doesn't, those people are wrong, their preferences are based in sadism and need to be fixed
/r/MensRights29/06/22 02:23 AM
11

And some rape victims fall in love with their rapists. Doesn't make it not rape.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 02:21 AM
5

There aren't any women being forced into pregnancy by the government (hilarious how you think thats even close to the child abuse that is male genital mutilation) They're just getting all that equality they asked for: "Keep it in your pants"
/r/MensRights29/06/22 02:17 AM
14

The finger sure is pointed at us to go fix it The high road is getting mighty tiring, has been for decades
/r/MensRights29/06/22 02:16 AM
16

I mean, she blatantly stated she was reducing the quality of her, and therefor her employer's, care to the most profitable demographic based on political bullshit those people had basically no part in
/r/MensRights28/06/22 10:54 PM
14

Wonder if there's a "botched circumcision" tracker. Wouldn't put it pass these hags who are already mutilating children to do it more just to make themselves feel better
/r/MensRights28/06/22 10:53 PM
17

Why should your feelings affect my decision making at all? It’s not like women as a whole are expected to do jack shit to care about mens feelings
/r/MensRights28/06/22 03:18 PM
20

The entire idea that I should keep a running process in my mind about whether I am making a woman uncomfortable in any context is an unreasonable burden to put on men. Men do not exist to make womens lives easier, and women need to stop pretending they do
/r/MensRights28/06/22 03:16 PM
2

They literally don’t The entire argument is “this is hard for women, so men have to make up for it”
/r/MensRights28/06/22 02:59 PM
7

Jail? Have we already forgotten Emmet Till? Jail wasn’t even an option
/r/MensRights28/06/22 12:08 PM
4

They were MADE to handle it by being treated this way from childhood but punished more if they made an “unmanly” response
/r/MensRights28/06/22 12:03 PM
10

Over 100 baby boys die each year in the US from having their genitals mutilated. And no one cares about that.
/r/MensRights28/06/22 11:51 AM
34

You’re not a woman, doesn’t count apparently
/r/MensRights28/06/22 11:32 AM
29

Wasn’t blaming men always a bigoted manufactured controversy
/r/MensRights27/06/22 10:14 PM
10

Right? Why the fuck should men care, given how mens reproductive rights are treated, this bullshit virtue signaling proposal included
/r/MensRights27/06/22 06:32 PM
9

And that analogy isn’t even as bad as this bullshit
/r/MensRights27/06/22 06:30 PM
8

Why would we reward threatening to sterilize boys? If anything, it’s time to go after voting rights next, until they’re signing up to the draft like men are forced to
/r/MensRights27/06/22 06:28 PM
31

Are you kidding? If genders were reversed he’d be dead
/r/MensRights27/06/22 12:00 AM
2

forced female circumcisions, too Equality, after all
/r/MensRights26/06/22 08:21 PM
6

Yeah, but the joke shows how stupid they are They are in no way comparable, and if this is what feminists think is "controlling bodies" how about we have them all circumcised and see how they feel then?
/r/MensRights26/06/22 08:21 PM
7

Yup, which is why this "talking point" is just a thinly veiled "Gimme whatever i want or we'll cut your balls off" When feminists can't get what they want, they attack men. This is just their standard (disgusting) MO
/r/MensRights26/06/22 08:16 PM
3

Awe, thanks! I don't date feminists, tho. They too cray cray and think really stupid shit like forcibly sterilizing men is in any way a rational response, even in jest, to overturning roe
/r/MensRights26/06/22 08:15 PM
6

Well, and it's not intended to be reversible. Kind of an important point
/r/MensRights26/06/22 08:14 PM
9

Yeah they won't be so happy at the reaction to any "mandatory" anything
/r/MensRights26/06/22 08:12 PM
7

So? Women want choice over their body, they can go get their own tubes cauterized. Their body, their choice
/r/MensRights26/06/22 08:11 PM
6

It's a permanent sterility procedure
/r/MensRights26/06/22 08:11 PM
9

Thats not including the other complications like lifelong pain
/r/MensRights26/06/22 08:11 PM
11

it's thinly veiled "Gimme what i want or we cut your balls off"
/r/MensRights26/06/22 08:10 PM
22

yup, they're down to "gimme what i want or we'll cut men's balls off"
/r/MensRights26/06/22 08:09 PM
97

or making it mandatory for women to get But read it as it's intended: "GIVE US WHAT WE WANT OR WE'LL CUT YOUR BALLS OFF" Thats the sentiment behind it, treat them that way
/r/MensRights26/06/22 08:08 PM
44

because saying that wouldn't be a completely sexist attack against men And what they wanted was a completely sexist attack against men
/r/MensRights26/06/22 08:06 PM
3

It is a clown show, i just didn't expect the one in makeup to not realize it until now
/r/MensRights26/06/22 08:03 PM
14

Thought you were bored of the conversation? So hypocrite and a lair, then!
/r/MensRights26/06/22 08:03 PM
14

Oh no! You're BORED??? WHAT WILL WE DO GUYS? THEY HAD ANOTHER FEELING THAT DIDN'T RELATED TO THE CONVERSATION THAT WE DON'T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT, HOW DO WE PROCEED WITH THIS?
/r/MensRights26/06/22 08:02 PM
12

Seemed to be a feminist issue when they got their FEMALE Genital Mutilation ban legislation pushed at the same time as Roe Could you at least argue.. you know... well? Like not stupidly? Like have facts and know history like you've been to school, instead of basing every argument about how it makes you feel? You look like an idiot ITT
/r/MensRights26/06/22 08:01 PM
30

It doesn't matter if you like the comparison, what matters is if the comparison is valid. Which it is, because the logic of the argument of bodily autonomy includes baby boys and always will, so to use the "my body, my choice" argument for abortion always opens the door to "Well why do you let baby boys dicks get mutilated then?" Get fucking used to it
/r/MensRights26/06/22 07:59 PM
1

No, not a horrible idea, a literal suggestion to physically assault men and should be treated as such. Pretty sure they won't like the response to that one
/r/MensRights26/06/22 07:58 PM
9

You mean all those centuries of being treated better than the average man, but getting to pretend they weren't by only comparing to the top 1%? GTFO of here with your revisionist history bullshit. The average woman has been better treated/protected/cared for than the average man since the beginning of time, and no amount of feminist bullshit trying to pretend otherwise will change that.
/r/MensRights26/06/22 07:55 PM
8

Yup! Glad you fuckers finally get it
/r/MensRights26/06/22 07:54 PM
9

Men don't have any already, whats left to take away? I mean, besides the rights to men's body's itself they already don't have, like how our dicks get skinned as soon as we're born. Guess they could do that retard shit and say "Oh well we'll just force medical procedure's on men then!" as if that was the same thing, and as if actually trying that wouldn't lead to their imminent demise
/r/MensRights26/06/22 07:53 PM
6

Right? Bitch acting like we weren’t there to watch the whole drama ourselves
/r/MensRights26/06/22 07:31 PM
3

Boo
/r/MensRights26/06/22 07:17 PM
3

They hope it’s all about them, that’s for sure
/r/MensRights26/06/22 07:17 PM
9

😂😂 did you pull all those big words off “how to insult the mens: for dummies!”?
/r/MensRights26/06/22 07:16 PM
4

🤣🤣🤣 he’s the dense one! 😂😂 Tell another one
/r/MensRights26/06/22 07:14 PM
6

Or taking it away will give women a taste of what life without reproductive rights is like, and the next push might actually include men!
/r/MensRights26/06/22 07:12 PM
2

🤣🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights26/06/22 07:07 PM
1

Then what else would they use to justify all their bullshit?
/r/MensRights26/06/22 07:04 PM
4

Solipsistic to the extreme
/r/MensRights26/06/22 07:02 PM
12

They don’t have any cards to play but to blame men Funny how even after all that bleating about how they don’t need no man, men are still their only choice when getting things done. And even then, they only help by treating him more and more like shit until they get what they want. And then men don’t want to help these strung indepandand wahman and they’re all shocked pickachu face
/r/MensRights26/06/22 07:00 PM
11

Funny how there’s no checking that the “for the child” support is even being spent on the child
/r/MensRights26/06/22 06:57 PM
12

Also squandered 50 years to get it as law instead of judicial activism bullshit
/r/MensRights26/06/22 06:56 PM
10

Lol right? And they literally can’t handle the “didn’t want a baby? Don’t have sex!” Despite saying it themselves to men ITT 🤣🤣🤣
/r/MensRights26/06/22 06:55 PM
11

Just like woman already made the choice to get pregnant when she consented to sex! Hurray equality!
/r/MensRights26/06/22 06:53 PM
5

So, just to be clear here, what your doing is like me jumping into a feminist sub and calling everyone I don’t agree with an ugly cunt who better enjoy her cats? And then I pat myself on the back, because I “triggered” so many people? If I thought you were male, I’d ask if you were 12, but sadly you seem about average for a grown up feminist
/r/MensRights26/06/22 06:49 PM
24

Don’t worry, their mask is almost all the way off. The “consent of the child” is particularly hilarious because they certainly don’t need consent to cut parts of the kids dick off, but they do to swab the inside of his cheek? Almost like it’s whatever is good for the woman, no matter who suffers, and all the “reasons” are pulled right out of their ass
/r/MensRights26/06/22 01:01 PM
2

Manly is whatever a man (adult human male) is doing, not the other way around. If a man decides to put on a frilly pink dress and dance in the street, that is the most manly thing he could be doing, because a man is doing it. Stop using shaming language to try and control men, it’s disgusting to watch
/r/MensRights25/06/22 10:48 PM
2

This sounds quite a bit hollow when you end it using the same masculinity shaming language as the types of women you claim not to be. Women don’t get to decide what is “manly” or “boyish”, that’s just manipulative bullshit
/r/MensRights25/06/22 10:30 PM
11

“White men have all the rights!” “I mean, they don’t need any!” “Just like the NPC claves I expect them to act like in my life as I literally do fuck all for them at any time, having deluded myself with my own sexism that they have everything so I can justify treating them like shit, because I am a stupid cunt who can’t solve my own problems, so I bitch at men till they magically get solved”
/r/MensRights25/06/22 11:35 AM
1

There’s more than one type of FGM, ranging from not as bad to much worse than standard American MGM, which is irrelevant, because their are also grades of MGM like splitting the penis in half, but you wouldn’t know about that either, because you haven’t bothered to look into it beyond a quippy non point that reveals your ignorance. And you’re using that ignorance to defend MGM, WHICH IS ABSOLUTELY SEXUAL ABUSE, revealing your blatant sexism. Good day, child sexual abuse defender
/r/MensRights25/06/22 11:26 AM
29

Women also have the greatest decision making power in regards to pregnancy, birth, childcare, and everything associated to it. But as soon as there's something to possibly criticized them on, it's "OH WHAT DO YOU MEAN? I JUST DECIDED TO ABANDON MY PARENTAL DUTY OF CARE AND LET HIS GENITALLY MUTILATED DAD WHOSE CHOICE I ALREADY KNOW MAKE THE DECISION"
/r/MensRights24/06/22 04:39 PM
30

🤣😭
/r/MensRights24/06/22 03:21 PM
6

Oh please. If we counted sexual assault on men with the same standard we do for women, that number becomes 7 out of 10
/r/MensRights24/06/22 03:16 PM
1

some posts are just woman-hate Some are. All the ones accused of blatant woman hate are not
/r/MensRights24/06/22 02:54 PM
1

the fuck are you on about?
/r/MensRights24/06/22 02:22 PM
1

Which is my point, you get triggered on anything that you perceive as a slight against women, and "call it what it is" to you. Which gives us fuck all idea of how much actual misogyny there is, here, because you're going by how your feel instead of using logic and facts. And the reason we don't censor them here is we expect people to be able to counter with a valid logical argument, and misogyny/misandry is generally pretty easy to shoot down. The feminists who come here often consider anything …
/r/MensRights24/06/22 02:14 PM
1

you seriously live with a blindfold on, don't you? Epstein? Yeah, billionaires certainly aren't as public about it now, but make no mistake they never stopped being as viciously power hungry Edit: And why the fuck do you think JFK was assassinated? Because some rando ordinary average guy decided it would be fun one day?
/r/MensRights24/06/22 01:58 PM
6

No, i would expect you to do your goddamn fucking job as a parent and protect your child from sexual abuse of any kind, from any one, at any time. And you've decided, beforehand to fail at that, and that tells me all i need to know about you as a person. Kindly fuck off Edit: you knowing it's wrong and letting it happen anyway isn't better, it's clearly quite a bit worse
/r/MensRights24/06/22 01:55 PM
1

👏
/r/MensRights24/06/22 01:53 PM
1

... Thats, like, literally half of history
/r/MensRights24/06/22 01:52 PM
5

The privilege of having more responsibility and consequences than a woman in an equivalent situation, at all times
/r/MensRights24/06/22 01:52 PM
1

Why would a mens sub use your definition for “blatant woman hate”?
/r/MensRights24/06/22 01:51 PM
3

Still are. Most mens issues affect black men disproportionately, which makes advocacy convenient because framing it racially gets less pushback these days.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 01:26 PM
1

im triggered, huh? As you clearly deflect from my point This is exactly what I’m talking about
/r/MensRights24/06/22 01:17 PM
0

Neither do debtors prisons and wage slavery, both things men get if the woman chooses it
/r/MensRights24/06/22 01:15 PM
5

No reason the believe the discussion isn’t at a 5yo 💩 flinging level at that point
/r/MensRights24/06/22 01:12 PM
3

Without realizing it Excuse me?
/r/MensRights24/06/22 01:11 PM
3

Why would a mens sub use your definition for “blatant woman hate”? Are you off in /r/feminism calling out their blatant man hate? (Doubt it, they’d have banned you) If you stop reacting to any criticism of women as “hate” you might actually learn something
/r/MensRights24/06/22 01:10 PM
1

But also risks, as others covet what you have and might just kill you for it
/r/MensRights24/06/22 01:08 PM
7

Literally thought control “You must view this act/scenario/person the same way I do!”
/r/MensRights24/06/22 01:04 PM
1

Put a space in front next time
/r/MensRights24/06/22 12:56 PM
7

I think it’s a fascinating way to pretend you aren’t responsible by “handing off” the decision to someone you chose, whose choice you already know. “I personally think rape is bad, but I can never understand that as a man. I’ll let my daughters mother decide if she should be raped in her first day of life. She says it doesn’t hurt and she won’t remember anyway, so it’s fine. “ That’s you. That’s what you sound like. You picked a child sexually abusive partner, and are flat out admitting you won’…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 12:49 PM
5

So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching the courses, influencing the public policies, and the massive, well-funded feminist organizations with thousands and thousands of members all of whom call themselves feminists... they are not "real feminists". That's not just "no true Scotsman". That's delusional self deception. Listen, if y…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 12:46 PM
1

Most members of the US military aren’t all that bad, either. Many of their aggregated effects sure are tho
/r/MensRights24/06/22 12:44 PM
3

Were any of the examples in this thread women breastfeeding? That’s like saying “I can have my penis out because I use it for normal bodily function” It’s a non argument, a deflection from what he was talking about
/r/MensRights24/06/22 12:43 PM
7

So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching the courses, influencing the public policies, and the massive, well-funded feminist organizations with thousands and thousands of members all of whom call themselves feminists... they are not "real feminists". That's not just "no true Scotsman". That's delusional self deception. Listen, if y…
/r/MensRights24/06/22 12:40 PM
27

When women compare how they were doing in the past, they compare it to the kings of the time, and gosh darn it, turns out they don't do so great. If you compare it to the average man by numbers, and not by whats left by survivor ship bias, there probably isn't a time in history where woman have had it worse than men.
/r/MensRights24/06/22 12:14 AM
77

Yeah people love to pretend women don’t use men to enact their violence so they can keep being sexist about it
/r/MensRights23/06/22 06:52 PM
2

It's complicated. But basically, if online voting were secure enough, like from your phone, (big if, i know) it enables a society to suddenly be a pure democracy and get accurate votes on every subject almost instantly So if (another big one) a system can get this information, organizing it in a way that acts like our human representatives do now automates the job of human representatives, and the voting populace never has to worry about their rep casting a vote in a way they didn't expect. Or i…
/r/MensRights23/06/22 03:50 PM
14

Is it not used in this sense? they say it is, but the change in terminology is what reveals the issue "Toxic Masculinity" means the sexist gender expectations/norms/roles society puts on men. When we were dismantling sexist gender roles for women, we didn't call them "toxically feminine" for being in the kitchen. We blamed the people who were keeping her in the kitchen. So why was "sexist gender roles/expectations" good enough then, but not now? Why did it need it's own male specific term that c…
/r/MensRights23/06/22 03:25 PM
13

women get away with things men do not and I dont think anyone can disagree with that, surely! Orly? You should try and post that opinion in r/feminism, You'll find out exactly how many people disagree with it. Or even in a mainstream sub like /r/askmen or /r/askreddit Maybe even an /r/cmv on this, you'll find a lot of people that disagree with that
/r/MensRights23/06/22 03:06 PM
12

equity This is a very dangerous game. It requires taking power from some to give it to others, and you're back to the people who are all about controlling power, and power corrupts. There is no system managed by humans that will be equitable. It will immediately devolve into identity politics and infighting over who should get what portion and why, and oh my ancestors had this problem so i deserve more, and so on. There is no winning in this system. It will always devolve into infighting. It's t…
/r/MensRights23/06/22 03:02 PM
10

You're right it's confusing, and i think you're right for speaking out, and i am not excusing the response you got. Just explaining it. It comes from the same place the backlash to "not all men" comes from, and honestly idk what to do about that There is the slight difference that men's misbehavior against women is socially sanctioned and legally punished, while women's misbehavior against men isn't, and so men don't have a way to protect themselves from it.
/r/MensRights23/06/22 02:56 PM
9

I have been chewed out by people in the past by commenting that not all men are x tbh this is why you got the hate I know you are saying you are ok with men's vunerability, but it comes across as worse than "Not all womyn!". Many men get that from people, when bringing up these issues. "Well, IM a woman and I didn't do that SO IT MUST NOT HAPPEN AT ALL" I know thats not what you were doing, but notice how often exactly that does happen
/r/MensRights23/06/22 02:30 PM
14

I came to that conclusion because you said you were a feminist. And feminism has a lot to say on when and where men are allowed to be victims, which makes you by default as complicit, so long as you call yourself one. If i may ask, why do you call yourself a feminist? Is it because you believe in equal rights? Because there is a movement for that, it's called Egalitarian or Egalitarianism and it's what i'd be calling myself if there wasn't a organization with KKK level of hate trying and succeed…
/r/MensRights23/06/22 02:26 PM
9

I'd be careful. You sound almost reasonable, and if that is true you're going to learn a lot here. A lot of things that will show you the dark side of feminism. Mostly from how they react to you. If you thought the misogyny you got when supporting men before was bad, wait until you critique feminism in any way to a feminist Casey Jay has a great documentary called The Red Pill (https://theredpillmovie.com/) where she started off just like you! Wanting to reach out and see what all these misogyni…
/r/MensRights23/06/22 02:14 PM
12

Well also understand the women who attacked them for being vulnerable started off sounding exactly like you
/r/MensRights23/06/22 02:07 PM
11

It's simpler than that. Men get treated as problem solvers. They exist to solve society's (and women)'s problems. If men have a problem of their own, in any way that goes against this desire by society (and many women) because now the tool you expected to extract work from is asking for something back THATs where all the hate comes from. It's literally any time a man asked to be treated as human, and that is most frequently learned by men the first time they cry in the presence of a woman. I kno…
/r/MensRights23/06/22 02:05 PM
19

The post titled "Reddit is a cesspool of misogyny"? Yeah, that one. I don't exactly see you calling out the obvious misandry in the responses over there, either. it was one of the most sexist things I have ever experienced. From your feminism post, referring to someone talking mean to you while you were perfectly safe in your own home? That's quite a privileged life you've led, if mean internet comments are the most sexist things you have experienced. Let me adjust the scale for you: 70% of US a…
/r/MensRights23/06/22 02:00 PM
1

The most hilarious part of this response that still completely deflects is that it reveals how biased you are as well as your lack of foundation in actual science. There absolutely is objectivity, and only people that don’t like that objectivity deny that. Harm can be clearly defined on both a mental and physical level. Neurons affected. Trauma to the brain. All very objective metrics. It’s when the study authors own subjective interpretation of reality is applied that the study bias comes out. …
/r/MensRights23/06/22 05:56 AM
9

How about the Female Genital Mutilation ban? Girls have legal protections on their genitals that men don't. (tho, a sexist like yourself will probably come back with bullshit mental gymnastics so you can pretend that is still equality)
/r/MensRights23/06/22 01:28 AM
23

So if you deign to speak, others are required to like it? You can answer the question and still have a shit take
/r/MensRights23/06/22 01:26 AM
1

Don’t hold your breathe. You wouldn’t accept any sources because you clearly can’t read, having completely ignored any of my points. Why would I expect a source to change things? Yours was bullshit, as I said
/r/MensRights23/06/22 01:06 AM
1

See? Using selective definitions to make women appear more victimized. Ignoring for now which definition of rape they use (if it’s “penetrative” rape, that 1 in 71 is meaningless), and how the stats were collected (self reported studies heavily bias against men who are shamed into hiding it), those numbers still don’t beat the 70% of adult US males who were strapped down and mutilated as children. A bodily violation clearly more permanent and harmful than rape. But again you will just pretend th…
/r/MensRights23/06/22 01:04 AM
1

That 7 out of 10 was just counting boys who had their genitals mutilated by their parents at birth, something girls are fully protected from despite it having the same effects of psychological trauma I wasn’t even bothering to include prison rape (the place real rape culture exists) But I can see no amount of logic/facts/reason will change your mind from “womyn are oppressed!” You may just be the most sexist person I’ve interacted with! Congrats! The level of gymnastics you’re going through to d…
/r/MensRights23/06/22 12:59 AM
1

pretty much, yeah Until it affects women somehow, no one will give a shit
/r/MensRights22/06/22 08:10 PM
3

All the boys Boko Haram has killed and enslaved over the years, to a general "meh" from the entire world, until he took some vagina's hostage, and suddenly it was "bring back our girls!"
/r/MensRights22/06/22 08:07 PM
5

not without government intervention, at least bachelortax
/r/MensRights22/06/22 08:06 PM
30

Get used to it, they try to smear MRA's every time they can You been called an incel yet? It's their fad replacement for "loser" or "virgin"
/r/MensRights22/06/22 06:48 PM
24

Lol, MGTOW as 'misogyny' Guys doing what feminists wanted and leaving them the fuck alone is apparently hatred of women 🙄
/r/MensRights22/06/22 06:47 PM
3

It's hilarious to see a feminist complaining about "copy and paste" responses. at least ours include logic, facts, and a valid argument 😆
/r/MensRights22/06/22 05:25 PM
1

Is strapping down a baby girl and modifying her genitals considered sexual assault? Because that mutilation is counted in women's SA stats, but someone just gets left out despite 70% of adult males in the USA having this violation performed on them. Thats why how the stats are collected, and what they consider SA is very important. Men get written out of these things. Care to elaborate on how they collected that "1 out of 10 rape victims are male" stat? does it include women who rape men, or jus…
/r/MensRights22/06/22 05:01 PM
1

Too bad feminism doesn't have a uniform, and literally anyone who says they're one is one. You don't get to "not real feminists" men's problems with feminists away, those cunts are still causing problems under the banner of feminism and often with their support
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:47 PM
0

yeah, it's "funny"
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:46 PM
3

Women flat out state that men's experience is "the baseline", while not understanding what men's experience is at all The "baseline" is a fantasy she's built up in her head of what she perceives men's lives are like. And since women punish men who show any weakness or complain, all the men (she discounts the complainers as "not real men") she knows never seem to have any problems whatsoever! THEIR LIVES MUST BE PERFECT
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:44 PM
3

And inventing things that don't exist to keep pretending to be oppressed. Like the wage gap myth. Complete bullshit 100% doctored stat to make women look oppressed, with no basis in fact if you dissect the stat at all
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:41 PM
1

Yup, now i'm just angry
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:38 PM
1

I'm curious how you say you fight for equality and use feminism as some kind of example of it. You know they did a whole bunch of research to prove how harmful genital mutilation was over 50 years ago, and have let every baby boy in the USA get mutilated for no better reason than their own double-standards sexism? Do you understand that their "1 in 4 womxn!" stat, if applied the same way to men, would mean 7 in 10 men were sexually assaulted?
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:32 PM
1

Today it's about giving unfair power to women and attacking men for nothing. That was yesterday, too. And the day before that. And the day before that. ... I'll skip to the end: it was always that way
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:30 PM
2

Yup, didn't like what you said, so immediately implied you would cause violence and harm to women. Seriously, it's one step behind SWATing, and the bitch can't see it
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:29 PM
2

By feminism's definition of "women's rights", no, because women never have enough rights and are still oppressed in white rural american in their eyes. By an objective definition that doesn't include personal bias? YES, there are no countries where women don't have rights while men do.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:27 PM
1

He very clearly acknowledged that you are seeing the "bad" in feminism, yet still using feminism to define your worldview and view of other cultures Did you not think those views of other cultures might also be bad? Ever heard of the fruit of the poisoned tree? Or poisoning the well?
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:24 PM
1

And men there have unequal access to being cared for and having someone else deal with all their problems. What's your point?
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:22 PM
3

The only kind feminists allow
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:19 PM
1

Thats a much better example Curious how they're so butthurt about "enforced monogamy" when men are forced to do their half all the time.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:17 PM
2

Exactly. The idea that women are the primary victims only exists in their head, and mostly because they won't allow men to be victims
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:16 PM
1

bullshit
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:15 PM
1

There are more male victims of sexual assault than women, if you use the same standard for both genders. But men get written out of the definitions
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:15 PM
1

Wrong That stat is only valid because they ignore male victims. If you use the objectively same criteria for a victim and apply it equally to men, 7 out of 10 men in the USA have been sexually assaulted.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:14 PM
1

Doctored statistics by feminists who exclude men from the results, you mean
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:13 PM
1

Men are sexually assaulted to a lesser degree but it still happens at all ages also bullshit. The common feminist number is 1 in 4 women were sexually assaulted at some point in their lives. Using their same criteria for men, 7 out of 10 men in the USA have been. Their own logic requires you to blind yourself to male victims for it to work at all
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:12 PM
1

False. in the USA, the often touted feminist line is 1 in 4 women have been SA at some point in their lives. Using their same definitions of SA, 7 out of 10 men were.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:11 PM
1

I'm in the USA, and 7 out of 10 men were sexually assaulted as children. But the 1 in 4 women stat is all that gets attention
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:10 PM
1

His work wasn't Freudian enough already?
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:09 PM
1

And in some countries men sit in jail, accused of SA and rape they didn't commit, while they were someone else entirely and had proof. ...given that, the prospect of women who killed their kids being in cages for a bit doesn't make me feel so bad
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:07 PM
2

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Aight, lemme catch my breath. The fictional dystopia in Orwell's 1984 would cum in their pants at the prospect of what our current governments do. 1984 would be a step up from what we have now, just with them being less subtle about it
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:05 PM
1

So women tell you we're raped, women do studies to prove we're raped Bold thing to say from the camp that made it so men couldn't be considered victims of rape, got men's DV shelters shut down, and made all forms of SA only considered SA if they were male against female.... Yeah, those stats are bullshit. Not because that amount of women aren't victimized or raped, but because they ignore all the men who also are, while blaming them for their own victimization. It's cute you think your bullshit …
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:03 PM
1

So feminist made up the fact that women are 5 times more likely to be harrassed or assaulted Yup, by doctoring the stats to discount male victims. Thats exactly what we're saying, and if you don't like it, you're welcome to go look at how those stats were made.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 04:00 PM
1

society will help and enable them to do it Can you imagine that? "Oh hey what a nice looking woman, sex would be nice!" and a bunch of other women jump her to hold her down for you, while also patting you on the back "You're so strong and independant! you don't need no woman!" tl;dr my perception of most divorce lawyers/courts/judges
/r/MensRights22/06/22 03:59 PM
1

😑 That you would think it's difficult for someone using Rohipnol to also use a bit of Viagra is a level of naivete i don't know what to do with
/r/MensRights22/06/22 03:57 PM
1

Date rape Weapon Tie him up while he's asleep Can still be drugged with viagra Taken advantage of when drunk if they don't want erections or are stressed they don't stay hard This is as stupid a take as "Woman have a way to shut their bodies down and not get pregnant when raped" Erections are a reaction like that knee jerk thing your doctor does. Men do not have direct control of it. They have some control, but it's very similar to the amount of control a woman has over how wet she is. What you'…
/r/MensRights22/06/22 03:55 PM
1

Thats exactly what it is. Trying to twist someone else's internal reality so that no woman is every held accountable for her actions, ever. Thats their goal
/r/MensRights22/06/22 03:52 PM
1

Women commit statistically more non-reciprocal DV (i.e., the man didn't hit back) And even when it's a fight and they're both hitting, women generally are hitting back, and use weapons far more often (the trope of the frying pan, for example) It has to come into the picture somewhere. Thats where they getcha. "What do you mean you don't believe Amber? Didn't you hear all her stories? There must have been something going on
/r/MensRights22/06/22 03:49 PM
1

It's "hilarious", because if her definition was gender neutral, 7/10 American men have been SA'd in the first year of life by their own parents I mean, they all were, but she would have to include that, and that makes the 1 in 4 a bit less impressive.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 03:46 PM
1

Dude, your blindfold is still on. Feminists had a ton of good research about the psychological damaging effects from the trauma of Female Genital Mutilation, and not once during any part of the process of getting it banned do they think "hmm, maybe this hurts boys the same way?" And everyone else just goes along with it. Imagine that. Strapping babies down and mutilating them sexually, without anesthesia (babies "couldn't feel pain" until the 70's, and even then it took till 2000's for anesthesi…
/r/MensRights22/06/22 03:43 PM
2

There are plenty. We allow women to be deadbeats without the consequences when they drop their kid off at the fire station, protected by law, no questions asked We allow women to be deadbeats without the consequences when they put the child up for adoption, because it's better than the alternative of killing the kid We allow women to be deadbeats without the consequences when they kill the kid before it's born We allow women to be deadbeats without the consequences when they kill the kid after i…
/r/MensRights22/06/22 03:35 PM
1

A woman will kill her baby because she can't look after it and is convinced no-one else can and doesn't want it to suffer They will also murder the children of a man they don't like. Still murder, no matter what their justification. Curious, if i decide you are suffering and i don't want you to anymore, it's ok to kill you? Or is that just the same as murder and you're pulling excuses for it out of your ass? We can get into Ted Bundy's abusive upbringing, if you're being that charitable.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 03:32 PM
1

The children of abusive mothers and victims of female child abuse need to speak out more I speak out as much as i can. I mostly get laughed at, dismissed, or outright ignored. I'd appreciate your angry rant, btw 😁
/r/MensRights22/06/22 03:30 PM
2

Woman == Good Man == Bad Literally as much thought as they put into it. If women could be predators, that would make something bad women's fault, and they can't have badness associated with women in any way. It's as maliciously abusive as it sounds, yes.
/r/MensRights22/06/22 03:28 PM
3

Sure, but in this case its not about who consented. It's been twisted into him taking pictures of kids
/r/MensRights22/06/22 02:03 PM
5

Sometimes?
/r/MensRights22/06/22 02:02 PM
7

This is why MRM are so big on accountability for women. Women who never face consequences for their actions can get addicted to harming others this way, and men have basically no defense
/r/MensRights22/06/22 02:02 PM
9

And yet women get away with it
/r/MensRights22/06/22 12:53 PM
22

they want to remove all thoughts about how women kill their kids They were only OK with it then because girls were affected, just like Boko's boys were ignored up until some girls got taken
/r/MensRights22/06/22 12:41 AM
50

Too bad the ones who serve that time are only half the abusers, by gender
/r/MensRights22/06/22 12:39 AM
5

Right, for men, there's an expectation that we should know what women would be upset about that, and factor that into our decision making. Even implying women do that for their man (like considering his feelings before talking about your sex life with your friends, for example) is considered unreasonable and sexist and an expression of oppression against women
/r/MensRights21/06/22 07:29 PM
4

Can't rig the game for people not playing
/r/MensRights21/06/22 07:23 PM
18

I don't see how it's rude. In those mens' defense, they've been brainwashed their entire lives to believe it's normal. When a woman transitions it's suddenly in contrast to the treatment she's received as a woman before that. Not exactly surprising. In fact, i'm surprised we don't hear more from them
/r/MensRights21/06/22 06:22 PM
5

yeah moving out of the states sounds nice, especially if it means less feminist bullshit. Any recommendations?
/r/MensRights21/06/22 06:19 PM
4

When you're pitting being ignored in a board room against LITERAL DISMEMBERMENT AND DEATH... Yeah, it's time we play olympics, cuz someone needs to learn a lesson in losing
/r/MensRights21/06/22 06:18 PM
6

oh we have both of those things, but we're either shamed for them or they're used at our expense
/r/MensRights21/06/22 06:15 PM
32

He told people about her infidelity, which she took as 'unreasonable' and had her entire media influence brought against him. Both of them were doxxed, had death threats, and lots of other bullshit. Main fallout for the rest of us was being able to see, in realtime, how the media colludes to protect it's own and how just about everything they've been publish is bullshit. It's the point when people stopped trusting main stream media game reviews. The media has pushed gamergate as an expression of…
/r/MensRights21/06/22 01:34 PM
2

Of course not, they don’t get to control the conclusions, why would they want the discus to happen?
/r/MensRights20/06/22 03:08 PM
8

The Privilege of no consequences If they'd been raised with consequences, they wouldn't pull this shit
/r/MensRights16/06/22 05:35 PM
2

But you don't have to wait years in doubt before spending your life in a cage getting raped due to a lie from some rando bitch. That doesn't sound better to you? /s
/r/MensRights16/06/22 05:20 PM
3

yeah, they seem to be forgetting that it's not about finding the truth of the matter to the prosecution, it's finding any excuse to win and increase their conviction rate.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 05:19 PM
-1

Disagree. Don't be a Turd
/r/MensRights16/06/22 03:40 PM
2

I wouldn't say "unnoticed", it gets reported on but the reactions to that sexual abuse are a bit different than what i want the reactions to sexual abuse to be...
/r/MensRights16/06/22 03:39 PM
3

Actually...
/r/MensRights16/06/22 03:26 PM
3

You considered THAT to be expressing anger? That rock you're under looks real comfy...
/r/MensRights15/06/22 01:08 AM
25

or is immediately useful, like "beat that guy up, i don't like how he looked at me"
/r/MensRights15/06/22 12:56 AM
5

"Don't be a Turd" has suddenly become an A+ insult 😂
/r/MensRights15/06/22 12:55 AM
9

There are more women in med school but in the medical field, women generally work in lower positions. Why? Because once they hit their peak they cash out by marrying a doctor and leave the field. This is a known problem and something med schools have to actively fight against, because it puts women in the negative as a training category. The payoff to train a doctor doesn't hit even till around 10 years of practice, most med students aren't full doctors until around early 30's, and many of the w…
/r/MensRights15/06/22 12:50 AM
64

Because it would blow apart their narrative of men as abusers and women as victims. If standards of sexual assault were applied equally, there would be 3-4x the amount of childhood sexual abuse victims as there are now. Case in point: 7 out of 10 adult males in the USA were strapped down and had their genitals skinned while children, but try getting people to agree that counts as sexual assault (even when the exact same thing done to a girl is)
/r/MensRights14/06/22 02:57 PM
3

at this point, filing first is the only defense you have. And even then it might get thrown out because of your gender
/r/MensRights14/06/22 02:50 PM
2

It's exactly what it looks like, they wanted a parallel court system because the real one wasn't doing what they wanted. The point of the system is to allow these kangaroo courts to get rid of "problematic" people. It's one of the Democrat's avenues of voter suppression and controlling the public narrative, because a kangaroo court conviction is still a conviction, and thats all they needed to write people off.
/r/MensRights14/06/22 02:48 PM
2

Yup, does double duty as shaming and expecting someone to do something for you because they share a characteristic with someone who wronged you once, or someone you knew years ago you heard through the grapevine...
/r/MensRights13/06/22 03:11 PM
22

yeah, it's societal encouraged sexism, and the most stupid kind
/r/MensRights13/06/22 03:09 PM
3

they just won't expect the dogs to start organizing and biting together They only want that one biting so they have an excuse to send it to the pound and get it euthanized. Not something they can do if it happens to all dogs at once
/r/MensRights13/06/22 03:03 PM
5

Well, yeah, she was right behind him, right up until there was a problem and she turned and left
/r/MensRights12/06/22 06:16 PM
20

Came to say this. It’s nonsensical and easy to shift the target to literally anything. “Slaves could have done <X> to end their own slavery so they have no right to complain” Doesn’t really matter what X is, you’re saying they just weren’t good or smart enough to think of a solution. That’s not how this works. That’s not how anything works, so anyone bringing this type of argument is only confirming they have no real argument, and are using this because it sounds “good”. “Good” meaning like “I w…
/r/MensRights12/06/22 05:34 PM
3

Emma Watson was a UN ambassador to feminism Has a whole speech where she tugs heartstrings with her dads mental troubles that ends with “So come on guys, we see you have problems, too! So help us solve all our problems, so we can get started on yours! #heforshe” So there’s 1 example of a pretty successful feminist. Not that I’ve given a shit about her since that speech
/r/MensRights12/06/22 04:59 PM
2

i bring it up all the time, and people laugh me off as crazy Whadayagonnado
/r/MensRights12/06/22 02:38 AM
2

Oh i'm pretty sure they do There's a reason they are soooooo upset at the prospect of it being used against them
/r/MensRights12/06/22 02:36 AM
5

Would you quit your mansplaining and be a man?? /s
/r/MensRights11/06/22 09:46 PM
1

They certainly expect them to be taken care of
/r/MensRights11/06/22 09:37 PM
6

it's not there because of feminism Except the part where feminism pushed for the ability to vote without the draft, in places without the draft, so you're entire argument here is bullshit You don't actually think this is something feminists are advocating for do you? Not only is it, they defend it as a right of mothers. Some post on twitter about how much fun it is to do. Those are your sisters. You have to live with that. They are "feminists" every bit as much as you are, and they are mutilatin…
/r/MensRights11/06/22 09:21 PM
1

Indoctrinated into believing it's the only way to achieve sexual success is not the same as wanting it, my dude. The woman who's kids i held at gunpoint was really motivated to suck my dick, too, she must have just wanted it /s
/r/MensRights11/06/22 07:56 PM
4

I think if you took the blinders off your eyes you'd find that most if not all of the people in this sub believe in equality. Problem is, feminism claimed to be for equality, and then a quick look at it's big wins (voting without paying for it like men do, and the right to continue to mutilate their (only boy) baby's genitals) shows them to be anything but
/r/MensRights11/06/22 07:48 PM
3

is lessened when women have access to education, well paid jobs Citation needed, as women in the USA have more access to education and well paid jobs than any time in history, and yet still only date men who make more than them. And we know because they seriously won't shut the fuck up about it, they think it's this massive problem that they can't find a man "on their level" when men in that position would be perfectly fine and actually expected to date "down" (also men don't consider it dating …
/r/MensRights11/06/22 07:46 PM
6

Sorry to break it to you, bud, but feminism isn't to blame for everything, and this misandry far predates what could be considered the feminist movement. This is something (mostly women) have been doing to men for centuries, it's part of an entire structure of indoctrination to convince baby boys that manhood is conditional and something that has to be "earned"
/r/MensRights11/06/22 07:26 PM
4

a made up word so that people can pretend they aren't their biological sex
/r/MensRights11/06/22 07:17 PM
2

If she womanlistened he'd have to mansplain it until she actually listened, don't tell her to do that!
/r/MensRights11/06/22 07:17 PM
4

well that was a really rude bitch-missal of his lived experience
/r/MensRights11/06/22 07:13 PM
2

#amberturd
/r/MensRights11/06/22 07:12 PM
3

way to cunterupt op
/r/MensRights11/06/22 07:11 PM
3

I prefer to call out their "cunterupting"
/r/MensRights11/06/22 07:10 PM
1

If our women weren't there to protect our kids, wtf are they good for?? Why are we leaving them with them at home, while the men are gone, when the children are not within our reach to protect?? (besides the sex/uterus thing, but i was hoping for an actual good action, not something they came equipped with)
/r/MensRights11/06/22 07:05 PM
5

Oh they already have a plan for that "Internalized Misogyny" or in other words, "You would do what i want if some man near you wasn't using their manly force to make you act like this!"
/r/MensRights11/06/22 07:04 PM
7

Yeah, i looked down at the giant scar on my penis given to me by a woman, and mentally shove that logic up the ass of the speaker
/r/MensRights11/06/22 07:04 PM
2

oh if you want a real rabbit hole... go look at the map of planned parenthood locations over a racial heatmap in the USA. Lies upon lies upon lies
/r/MensRights11/06/22 07:01 PM
4

Yeah, you could use fewer jumps from the constitution to make abortion absolutely illegal in all cases which i don't think anyone wants, but given the leaps in logic they made, thats the level of chaos activist judges can cause So its really important that rules like this be actual laws and not judges making shit up, which is what Roe V Wade was, no matter how much you supported the result
/r/MensRights11/06/22 06:57 PM
12

Stupid is the charitable assumption. Maliciously stupid is the other one, where they know full well how full of shit they are, and do it anyway
/r/MensRights11/06/22 06:46 PM
13

They will unironically give you a lecture about the damages of gendered words and legislation, and then vote for VAWA and the FEMALE Genital Mutilation Ban They're pretty effective at proving how damaging sexism can be, when unchecked or socially encouraged
/r/MensRights11/06/22 06:44 PM
17

we already have that one, we got it shoved down our throats when we asked why men weren't allowed out of Ukraine with the refugees
/r/MensRights11/06/22 06:44 PM
4

Intellectually, you're pretty close
/r/MensRights11/06/22 06:43 PM
10

facts
/r/MensRights11/06/22 06:42 PM
1

Thats because what would fit into "toxic femininity" already fits under "sexist gender expectations/roles/norms" ...funny how those terms that implied society was the one that needed to change weren't good enough when talking to men. Suddenly a term that implied the victim of the sexism needed to change, not the causes of it
/r/MensRights10/06/22 03:10 PM
4

You can't change societal expectations by lecturing the victim of them. You have to talk to the assholes enforcing them. In this case, largely women. So where is your lecture to women about not attacking/shaming men who don't conform to their internal misandric ideas of masculinity?
/r/MensRights10/06/22 03:08 PM
1

You are not brave like the men that actually died during war, so don’t try to be something that you are not. you mean while you come in here and pretend you and generations of women were oppressed? my god the level of /r/woosh
/r/MensRights09/06/22 08:16 PM
2

Congrats, your grandma didn't get to have a job as soon as someone else took care of all her needs. That is what you consider oppression WE, on the other hand, are wondering why we're missing half the skin on our genitals and busy dying in war. We are not the same.
/r/MensRights09/06/22 03:04 PM
0

well, yeah 😂😂😂 no one wants to give rights to the people they are exploiting, what if they want the right not to be exploited??
/r/MensRights08/06/22 10:08 PM
1

? intact meaning i have my foreskin? News to me. Here i was thinking i was sexually mutilated by every institution i was supposed to trust at the same time before they bothered to introduce themselves. Hope to be intact eventually tho, #foregen
/r/MensRights08/06/22 07:22 PM
1

me too
/r/MensRights08/06/22 05:59 PM
1

It's the new word for "virgin" or "loser", which always historically meant "women don't like you, therefore you have no value"
/r/MensRights08/06/22 05:53 PM
1

Glad to see some mothers gaining some empathy. Mine laughed as she told me how much i cried and screamed for weeks afterward
/r/MensRights08/06/22 05:49 PM
2

"Incel" as used by feminists or the white house classifying them as terrorists does not describe what the term Involuntarily Celibate describes. They call anyone they disagree with an incel, even married fathers standing with their children have been called incel. ITT there's a woman who's even supportive of men's rights that calls people she's mad at an incel. It's a slur that they're trying to make effective against men
/r/MensRights08/06/22 05:48 PM
0

Men are literally stripped of their sexuality and told they have to work to attain it, and that women are the judge that will allow access. Yes, men are very much raised as anti-sex objects. Sometimes referred to as Success Objects or Financial Objects for women. This is reinforced by repeated cultural messaging that masculinity is conditional, and something that can be taken away. Men learn this early, as the people who are supposed to protect and care for them skin their genitals the first day…
/r/MensRights08/06/22 05:24 PM
3

Legitimate Men's Rights Activists are anti-feminist, because feminism is anti-MRM as it has proven that repeatedly since it's inception.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 05:22 PM
1

Easier to accuse someone of "We don't like you" than it is to accuse them of "You don't like us" feeds their ego as well
/r/MensRights08/06/22 05:18 PM
2

Exactly my point. Shit got tense because of media hysteria, not as a response to realistic assessments of danger. Even in places like Paul Denyer country, those criminals don't materially affect the statistics, but do materially affect the public perception of the problem.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 04:53 PM
3

Men want women, women need men. Do you need to breathe? How often do you pay attention to your breath, given how much you need it? Now how much do you pay attention to your breath when you suddenly are faced with the prospect of not having it anymore? Suddenly it's at the top of your priority list. Men are rapists/abusers/pedophiles when they are behaving and doing things in service to women to keep them from asking for too much, and an incel when they do too little to try and shame them back on…
/r/MensRights08/06/22 04:44 PM
1

Yeah, and getting "them" classified as terrorists by the secret service is part of it. Collusion, corruption, and control. All the way to the top.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 04:41 PM
3

It's supposed to mean involuntary celibate. It's being used as a slur against men people don't like, or who object to sexism against men.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 04:40 PM
6

They say "sex" but that's just because thats what the entire intimacy dance gets reduced to. They wanted that woman to give a shit about them, and those women use them as anti-sex objects more than the men they're complaining about see those women as sex objects. "I wasted time/money on being her friend, and got no sex for my efforts" It seriously doesn't take more than a minute of thought to see how this sentiment is reflected in women. "I wasted all that time on being a fuck buddy, and got no …
/r/MensRights08/06/22 04:37 PM
5

It's the new fad in shaming men into doing more for women, or acting how they politically want them to act. Previous favorites were: "Loser" "Misogynist" "Virgin" "Insecure" "Deplorables"
/r/MensRights08/06/22 04:30 PM
2

Not always. My preference is to have a perfectly logical valid counter argument to my opponents. And then call them a cunt.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 04:29 PM
1

You're mistaking actual involuntary celibates with who feminists are slinging this slur at
/r/MensRights08/06/22 04:28 PM
2

Oh please, it's not genetic. It's a shame based indoctrination tactic to get men back on the plantation and in service to women It's nurture, not nature, and it's done by right cunts
/r/MensRights08/06/22 04:04 PM
20

It's not irrelevant, it's no longer pretending. It's a slur against men, nearly always has been. And it's a way to 'Other' that father so they could give themselves moral permission to attack him. (and dogwhistle to others to attack him as well)
/r/MensRights08/06/22 04:01 PM
7

MASSIVE. It's so funny that when the topic comes up, they twist it to pretend it's men preventing male birth control from becoming a thing. Men having a cheap/easy/reversible birth control will take most of feminism's power away as a result. No more whining about unplanned pregnancies, most of the steam out of their abortion arguments, far fewer child support cases, etc. Many of the things feminists make their money on are directly affected by men having cheap/easy/reversible birth control. So t…
/r/MensRights08/06/22 03:59 PM
2

Don't want to pile on... but you mentioned how trained you are in spotting child abuse, grooming, and pedophilia? So you could answer how much of it happens in a public park in full view, versus behind closed doors by someone the victim knows and trusts... right? Does the difference in those rates relate at all to the responses people take?
/r/MensRights08/06/22 03:44 PM
5

The bone of contention here is: whose fault is it that people are so kneejerk about potential pedo presence? I said.. the pedos. And what people are trying to tell you is this is incorrect. The rate of Pedo crimes has gone down just due to modern technology making it easier to find them. The perception that makes people so kneejerk is the fault of the media and largely feminism using the image of pedo's as male to push sexist domestic violence laws like VAWA and the Duluth Model. Yes, it's the f…
/r/MensRights08/06/22 03:18 PM
9

Preach. Women have whined about how nice life would be without men, i honestly think we should give them an idea. Wouldn't even have to end society, just stop men giving money/things/time to women and their whole house of cards collapses.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 03:11 PM
5

...i'm gonna need some stats on "Getting and selling images of kids makes a great income" It's an easily trackable crime that leads to life in prison. (ok well, the official punishment isn't life in prison, but that's definitely where a male would die)
/r/MensRights08/06/22 02:48 PM
5

Which is why comments like yours ... isn't this entirely the fault of pedophiles? are such a problem. If it was a pedophile problem, it wouldn't be something that targets just men who people think are pedophiles. Most child caretakers are women, and even if you believed a quarter of women were as sexually abusive to children and got off on power like male pedophiles, there would still be more female pedo's hurting kids just because so many women have unrestricted access. So, comments like yours …
/r/MensRights08/06/22 02:46 PM
3

as soon as you're able to define a whole group as "other", people give themselves moral license to treat them however they want. It's why "incel" is increasing in its usage as a slur meaning "Man who doesn't act how i want", because labeling men as that gives themselves moral license to be an absolutely morally bankrupt asshole, while still thinking they are a good person. Ends justifying means.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 06:09 PM
4

I should clarify, the trolls were posting and reporting at the same time, no involvement from actual members
/r/MensRights07/06/22 05:44 PM
0

This is a feelings over facts style argument. It literally isn't, as merriam webster doesn't have a monopoly on language or being right. That is an appeal to authority which in itself is a logical fallacy. So, wrong twice... That depends on your intentions, but regardless of your intentions you'd be an asshole. Wow, you're almost there... But agreed, that would be a majorly asshole thing to do. Something i also consider trolling, because it should be treated the same way since intentions can't b…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 05:38 PM
-1

Great, merriam webster's definition isn't everyone's definition. We clearly have different definitions. Yours focuses on intent, mine focuses on actions. expressing differing opinions constitutes trolling Is me going into a rape survivors sub about how often women lie and use DV charges to abuse men trolling? I'm just spreading truth and my opinions, right? Or did i fail to realize that the context mattered, and that my opinion, in that context, would be harmful and have the same result as troll…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 05:26 PM
-1

I'm not mistaken as a troll, I just think OP would mistake me as a troll 😑 And its not my definition of trolling, but the definition of trolling I.e, : a person who intentionally antagonizes others online by posting inflammatory, irrelevant, or offensive comments or other disruptive content if you're going to post a "definition", post where you got it from so the bias of the source can be vetted. Expressing a differing opinion, even if poorly researched, thought through, argued, etc isn't trolli…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 05:07 PM
0

Also to be fair, what you described can also be attributed to stubborn ignorance rather than trolling And how is that person different than a troll, from our perspective? They may not believe they are trolling, but if they are doing the same thing it doesn't really matter. This could also explain your own confusion in being mistaken as one
/r/MensRights07/06/22 04:59 PM
4

I'd probably count as a radical feminist trolling the forum whereas I'm really jsut engaging in discussion whilst having beliefs on both sides of the spectrum There are simple ways to determine if someone is a troll or not: you just have to determine if they are arguing in bad faith. And this ends up being pretty easy to do. If they assert something, give "evidence", someone debunks that evidence, and they move to new "evidence" instead of ceding the point at all... then you have a troll. e.g. F…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 04:39 PM
8

censoring and removing things we disagree with is a different thing than banning trolls or people commenting in bad faith, brigading, etc. Yes, it reveals our character to be far better than those on subs that censor contradictory information, but the super hardline stance means we deal with the same people who aren't contributing to the conversation and intentionally trying to derail the conversation. Someone coming in with "nuh-uh! It's actually this way" is part of the conversation. It's part…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 03:15 PM
1

The grooming is a societal norm. It's grooming because it is attempting to get a child into a state that is more beneficial to yourself than the child. It's just as bad as grooming a little girl to be a sex object, but people give it a pass because it's inhibiting as much of a boys sexuality as they can, instead of enhancing it. Still grooming, just in different directions. And this leads to lots of mental issues for men as they grow up. Think of all the complaints that men don't "open up" for e…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 02:34 PM
1

TBH the biggest challenge you will likely face is dismantling the sexist concepts of men indoctrinated into you by traditional society and feminism. For example, how is it that feminists researched, argued, lobbied, and succeeded in getting Female Genital Mutilation outlawed, but at the same time looked at Male Genital Mutilation and said "Eh, it looks better that way, so it's fine and totally not the same thing with the same damaging effects"
/r/MensRights06/06/22 08:54 PM
4

Well, no, because he isn't trying to get special privileges for only one gender, which is not being a decent person. Or defending people who lie about domestic abuse, for example. Feminism is incompatible with being a decent person
/r/MensRights06/06/22 08:45 PM
1

Having no memory of it doesn't mean the aggravated sexual assault didn't happen, or that it didn't affect your psychology growing up and even now, whether you realize it or not. The science on the psychological damage done by male genital mutilation is pretty solid. You can watch the PTSD effects of it happen in an MRI. This forms the basis of your psychology growing up, as well as tremendous lifelong damage. And certainly doesn't mean it wasn't intentionally emasculating.
/r/MensRights06/06/22 07:04 PM
1

THAT is what you noticed? It wasn't society skinning the dicks of newborn baby boys, just to get a head start on the emasculation?
/r/MensRights06/06/22 06:53 PM
1

"Examples of an organization doing sexist things from the beginning does not mean the organization was sexist from the beginning" - you. That is the worst example of a completely unfounded dismissal to protect your ego that i've ever seen.
/r/MensRights06/06/22 03:20 PM
2

I agree, but i'm also not buddy buddy with any KKK members. I hold the same rule for feminists.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 04:51 PM
2

We do. These women don't. That's the problem, they expect themselves to be magically taken care of, instead of taking care of themselves.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 04:50 PM
1

normalized institutionalized and legalized FTFY
/r/MensRights04/06/22 04:48 PM
1

In general defamation, libel and slander are not crimes anywhere on earth with very narrow exceptions Excuse me?? Citation. Fucking. Needed. UK has defamation, libel, and slander laws out the wazoo just for their royalty and famous people. Thats not including the slander laws available to common people. I don't know a country that doesn't have these as a class of law, at minimum to protect the ruling class.
/r/MensRights04/06/22 04:46 PM
3

Yeah, they want it as a weapon, and weapons need to be effective. If something makes the weapon less effective (Like a turd being really incompetent in her lying) that thing needs to be addressed in a way that makes the weapon more effective instead. Thus we get "imperfect victims"
/r/MensRights04/06/22 04:43 PM
0

Really? You asked? You asked all of them? I’m curious, where oh wizard you got this esoteric knowledge of what dead people wanted? Because it damn sure wasn’t that Also BS because there are plenty of support roles in the military that women would excel at
/r/MensRights03/06/22 02:49 AM
3

Feminist organizations are mage up of academic feminists, they are clearly connected. N.O.W. is an example of what that looks like when turned against the public.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 10:28 PM
5

Or posting here requires an alt because sexists like you try to use someone's account history and other subs to dismiss perfectly valid arguments to maintain your self-delusions that sexists organizations aren't sexists. The right to vote Men don't have the right to vote, thats a women exclusive. We have the privilege to vote, if we sign up to die at some politician's whim. To consider that a sign towards equality just reveals your blindness to reality even further. Good day.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 10:03 PM
3

(for any gender) PROVABLY bullshit, as the National Organization of Women frequently blocks alimony reform or any other male beneficiary legislation
/r/MensRights02/06/22 09:32 PM
8

Did you seriously just report me as a bot? lmao
/r/MensRights02/06/22 09:31 PM
4

The White Feather Campaign was a part of early feminism, and it was about shaming young men for not dying in war. Equality from the beginning my ass
/r/MensRights02/06/22 09:30 PM
4

it wasn't progress towards equality, it was progress towards reduced accountability and more political power. You're a damn fool who can't see reality if it bit your nose (which it probably has already)
/r/MensRights02/06/22 09:30 PM
31

Entitlement like women being entitled to the resources of a man? Paying on the first date, alimony, etc?
/r/MensRights02/06/22 07:31 PM
3

What, did i miss a /s? Far easier to cut down a rotten tree than become a part of it and try to clean the rot from inside. Egalitarian is a better word in every way for equal rights anyway, as it's not a gendered word, which feminists have reminded us forever is an example of sexist discrimination. You have no leg to stand on here.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 07:26 PM
5

as did many others, it seems
/r/MensRights02/06/22 07:23 PM
3

Or make it illegal to publicize the details of DV trails, so they can't have the public opinion seeing how full of shit many of them are
/r/MensRights02/06/22 07:21 PM
3

A "karen" rant you clearly didn't read, proving you're here in bad faith. Blocked.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 07:20 PM
3

Pasting reply from Karen Straughn: So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching the courses, influencing the public policies, and the massive, well-funded feminist organizations with thousands and thousands of members all of whom call themselves feminists... they are not "real feminists". That's not just "no true Scotsman". That's delu…
/r/MensRights02/06/22 07:16 PM
2

I never pretended anyone here was a saint, so who's strawmanning now? False generalizations are the fucking problem Uh-huh. When they're false. Sure.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 07:11 PM
2

It had as much backing as what you said
/r/MensRights02/06/22 07:08 PM
1

If you removed the bad actors you wouldn't have any actors left
/r/MensRights02/06/22 07:04 PM
4

Credit to Karen Straughn: So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching the courses, influencing the public policies, and the massive, well-funded feminist organizations with thousands and thousands of members all of whom call themselves feminists... they are not "real feminists". That's not just "no true Scotsman". That's delusional se…
/r/MensRights02/06/22 07:00 PM
5

No, you need not. Feminism is at odds with mens rights, since feminism as a political advocacy group so often shuts down or curtails the rights of men
/r/MensRights02/06/22 06:58 PM
1

or incredibly funny, depending on where you're sitting
/r/MensRights02/06/22 06:43 PM
4

Um, no it's not? I don't call myself a feminist due to the actions of feminists. I don't call myself a X due to the actions of Xs. What is difficult about that logic for you? What is hypocritical? Edit: and before you try to weasel out of your own logic, the referenced examples are prominent leaders, not fringe crazies, getting their bullshit passed as law like the Duluth Model. It's not the same thing as "OH THIS PERSON WHO SAID THEY WERE A MEMBER OF <group X> DID A BAD THING, THAT MEANS YOU AL…
/r/MensRights02/06/22 06:33 PM
4

People certainly seem to assume that, yes. And if the leaders of 'my' voting party aren't acting the way i want, i stop voting for them and calling myself a member of that party.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 06:18 PM
1

Women being able to vote without selling their bodies to war as the draft requires is a special female privilege above that of average males. It absolutely counts as female supremecy
/r/MensRights02/06/22 05:58 PM
7

Not Edit: and to readers following, notice how they specified no differences between the radical and 'neoliberal' philosophies, and expected the reader to go look up these 'different' feminists. It's the lazy "go educate yourself" all over again
/r/MensRights02/06/22 05:41 PM
4

Notice how my examples included the things they did that support my argument? That thing your comments are missing? I'm not going to do the work of constructing your argument for you. Those names are in the same bucket as the rest of them until you've proven otherwise
/r/MensRights02/06/22 05:30 PM
16

...I didn't see a single movie from the 90's so i have nothing of value to contribute? I already gave you examples, dude, i don't have to prove anything. The S.C.U.M. manefesto is public and when it was authored is public history. You're the one sticking your head in the sand, dude. But enjoy your block, troll
/r/MensRights02/06/22 05:13 PM
10

the majority of respected academic feminists are not related at all to the atrocities you refer to Citation needed, the pasted text gives examples of 'respected' feminists making law and being in positions of academic power. You have provided no counter examples, and just expect us to pretend all the other ones not named are innocent angels, instead of being basically copies of the examples given. It is far more likely all the unnamed ones are similar to the named ones than some magic "good" fem…
/r/MensRights02/06/22 05:08 PM
3

Semantically (and in this context), feminism and egalitarianism are different names for the same thing It's a direct challenge to this assertion, which is false. Edit: And this one Compared to the definition of feminism: The advocacy of women's rights on the basis of the equality of the sexes.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 04:38 PM
7

Dunno what PCU is, but no, wave 2 was about a lot more than that. Thanks for trying
/r/MensRights02/06/22 04:23 PM
21

We don't. We punish the first two for their own bullshittery. Wave 2 was the wave of the S.C.U.M. manefesto and the idea that the population of men should be reduced to 10% of current using abortion based eugenics. Wave 1 is the one that gave women special privileges like being able to vote without selling your soul to the military, or having legal protections protect only female genitals from mutilation. Earlier waves have their own misandric bullshit to take responsibility for, we don't need t…
/r/MensRights02/06/22 04:08 PM
4

"There's too many different types so you can't blame all of them using the label for the misandrist actions of the most influential ones making sexist laws" Yes i can. And Do. Edit: And to be real honest? It's far more accurate to do than how feminists blame all men for the actions of a tiny minority.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 03:42 PM
12

And still less embarrassing than the shit you post. Who knew?
/r/MensRights02/06/22 03:41 PM
11

from reddit entirely, they called their feminist admin buddies
/r/MensRights02/06/22 03:36 PM
55

you expected anything else? they have their precious narrative to protect, after all
/r/MensRights02/06/22 03:35 PM
12

Bullshit. Feminism is an anti-male hate group on par with the KKK
/r/MensRights02/06/22 03:26 PM
13

No it doesn't. Feminism is anti-male, always has been, and you only have to look at their actions to figure it out. Pull your head out of your ass.
/r/MensRights02/06/22 03:26 PM
6

"Definition" of feminism. Sure. Could we define it by it's actions instead of the pretty words it came up with for itself? The pictures you found are a response to radical feminism Oh, this bullshit again. Letting Karen Straughn reply to this one: So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching the courses, influencing the public policies…
/r/MensRights02/06/22 03:25 PM
3

Feminism was about female supremacy from the beginning. Stop gaslighting
/r/MensRights02/06/22 03:21 PM
6

Bullshit. Feminism is about women's empowerment at the expense of men
/r/MensRights02/06/22 03:20 PM
15

Copy paste response from Karen Straughn: So what you're saying is that you, a commenter using a username on an internet forum are the true feminist, and the feminists actually responsible for changing the laws, writing the academic theory, teaching the courses, influencing the public policies, and the massive, well-funded feminist organizations with thousands and thousands of members all of whom call themselves feminists... they are not "real feminists". That's not just "no true Scotsman". That'…
/r/MensRights02/06/22 03:19 PM
4

been that way for a while now
/r/MensRights02/06/22 01:57 AM
8

Ever hear what “projection” is? I’d assume so, it’s a feminists bread and butter. So your argument is that they have a bad argument “only real way you can blame women” … by coming in here without any data or valid arguments because it’s the “only real way you can blame men”
/r/MensRights31/05/22 03:03 PM
21

More like they’re the only ones to face real consequences for breaking that commitment.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 02:59 PM
54

Feminists
/r/MensRights31/05/22 12:20 AM
3

My mother wasn't a feminist (label wise, she ate all the women are oppressed stuff right up) and she didn't give a shit. I think you've overestimated the level of care mothers are willing to extend to their sons. Often its about the same level as Paris Hilton has for her purse puppy.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 06:36 PM
2

It's a tad more sinister than that. It's basically grooming except they're grooming them into financial/success objects while performing a shit-ton of abuse to minimize their sexual development, which also puts their sisters at a social advantage. The inability to criticize women or femininity is the direct cause of quite a lot of abuse men face.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 06:01 PM
9

As safe as men feel with mothers willing to skin their dicks as their “hello world!” Moment? You can shove your “oh no! SOME ONE LOOKED AT ME HALP” up your ass because the average male has dealt with worse the day they were born. And women made sure of it.
/r/MensRights30/05/22 04:25 PM
8

Well good for her, she's not the one being harmed by it. Bro needs to take care of himself first, and when sis gets over herself and wants to apologize he can consider letting her back into his life. Don't stay around people that hurt you. They don't love you like they say they do, and this is a great example.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 03:35 AM
16

Or... OR!!! DO blame her, because copying people is still performing the action, and she is responsible for her actions, even if those actions are words. Hold your sister accountable, don't excuse her sexism.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 03:17 AM
11

when she’s like this Very kind of you to give her the benefit of the doubt. Is that something she does for you?
/r/MensRights29/05/22 03:15 AM
23

I have a lot of respect for my sister first off Well there's your problem right there. Don't have respect for people who don't have respect for you.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 03:14 AM
54

... really? Women dominate a boy's childhood, and they come out of it thinking their purpose is to make women's lives easier at their own expense, and your question is "Where did this idea come from!?"?
/r/MensRights27/05/22 08:26 PM
2

Men having issues isn't in line with feminist ideology.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 07:11 PM
1

The only reason the MRM even exists is as a reaction to feminism. If feminism didn't exist, neither would the MRM. I disagree, MRM as a set of beliefs already existed but it was more worker and civil rights in the beginning. There wasn't a reason to care about gender when looking for people to help, uplift, and protect. Then feminism came along and gendered the whole thing, putting their fat ass in front, and we had to specify men's rights because a gender specific and discriminatory organizatio…
/r/MensRights27/05/22 06:52 PM
2

5 abusive sisters and a mother to train them
/r/MensRights27/05/22 06:46 PM
14

Do you think misogyny isn’t a real problem? Yes, because people give a shit when it happens. Unlike all the misandry in childhood education that goes unchecked or is even encouraged.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 06:42 PM
11

Yes, men have personally killed women who disrespected or harmed them Where did they say this doesn't happen nobody ever deleted the genes of women who harmed men, or even boys. One, you're #notallwomen'ing, the statement was clearly hyperbolic to imply it was exceedingly rare, not that a case of it happening couldn't be found. Two, Women have had natural selection too, thats all my point was no it wasn't. Your point was to shove "What about WYMYN" into the middle of a discussion about discrimin…
/r/MensRights27/05/22 06:19 PM
8

All im saying is women were not immune from the effects of poverty, famine, or pestilence. Nowhere in any parent of this comment was that topic even relevant, and then you used it as an argument with "So we agree!" Thats some deceptive manipulative bullshit right there. Also women who harmed men have been killed in the past Is a nonsense statement that specifically removed all context of the discussion because you don't like what that context implied (that you might be wrong about something) OF …
/r/MensRights27/05/22 06:14 PM
14

No, we don't agree. This is the dumbest argument i've seen a troll bring in here. Congrats.
/r/MensRights27/05/22 06:10 PM
1

I think there is this dilemma of men are not allowed to show emotion in society It's not a dilemma, it's intentional Its like keeping the livestock in line, emotion, empathy, support towards them will just make them less disposable. There ya go. This is the real reason why showing emotions is dangerous for men. It's like going around naked in a country where rape and assault are legal. People feel invited to attack you, they feel morally responsible to do so. (building character, testing, fitnes…
/r/MensRights27/05/22 05:14 PM
9

"He raised his voice! I was in danger"
/r/MensRights27/05/22 03:38 PM
9

...after all the irrefutable proof has been live streaming for two weeks, you mean. It's #believewomyn, after all, not #believevictims
/r/MensRights26/05/22 04:57 PM
8

I'll take it more seriously when the "support" is more than just empty words to attract attention When these organizations are representing male victims of DV, then i'll be impressed.
/r/MensRights26/05/22 04:56 PM
7

Not really, just shown how much blatant evidence of abuse is needed for them to even consider a male might be a victim of IPV. And if you go read actual press releases on the subject they spend the entire opportunity going on about how bad women have it
/r/MensRights26/05/22 04:54 PM
10

an organization that owes you nothing If they accept public funding they damn sure owe me something, and not being sexist is part of it. suddenly open its arms and provide you with the same benefits it provides those that its intended for it was intended for victims of domestic abuse. Then sexists came in and said men couldn't be victims. Defending this bullshit makes you complicit. You on the other hand are sexist By expecting people to be treated equally? Rich. You're not here fighting for a s…
/r/MensRights26/05/22 04:45 PM
7

We don't feel the need, we realize the need. Based on feminism and feminists collective sexist actions. Feminism is about the same as the KKK, except the KKK enacts their violence themselves, instead of getting someone else to do it (like the state). jeez just be happy with this Be happy a sexist organization that takes public funding to sexistly give out aid and support in many cases for abusers, not victims, and is now saying "well maybe men can be victims too! (but remember women have it wors…
/r/MensRights26/05/22 04:31 PM
15

Oh feminists will defend men all the time, as soon as they believe it gets them more power. Don't mistake what this is, they still don't give a shit
/r/MensRights26/05/22 04:28 PM
7

That is an EXTREMELY generous interpretation of their words and actions, and what they have chosen to do with "only" what they have. Asking to not be a sexist in your actions isn't asking for a "miracle", and demanding it in businesses is a law that these people are exempt from
/r/MensRights26/05/22 04:20 PM
-10

It is, but that doesn't stop them using it to hurt men or allow women who hurt men to go free
/r/MensRights25/05/22 10:21 PM
32

violate our sexual integrity Yeah, 70% of mothers in the USA are already guilty of this, as of the latest MGM statistics
/r/MensRights25/05/22 10:21 PM
1

Ok, and when we're talking about a movement that wasn't rotten and more about special unearned privileges for one gender from the start, we'll call you.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 10:06 PM
1

No, that is literally what most people think: That women are acted upon, not actors, and therefor not responsible for anything at all
/r/MensRights25/05/22 10:04 PM
2

well thats not exactly true... Only one gender has traditionally been dominant in childcare and shaping the worldview/prejudices of children, which then turn into adults that don't question that worldview. Which is why it's so hard to get anyone to acknowledge harm caused by mothers at all, even after they've killed children they will still look for a man to blame.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 10:02 PM
1

Congratulations, you're right. Now (and i know this is a stretch, so bear with me) realize more than one thing can be right at the same time. The question was "has metoo been bad" not "is metoo the only reason male dv victims are treated like shit"
/r/MensRights25/05/22 09:20 PM
2

Similar time? It went: #MeToo! -> "Great, do you have proof?" -> "#BelieveWomyn!" yup 🙄 toooootaly different
/r/MensRights25/05/22 09:19 PM
1

Lol, you replied their account out of existence
/r/MensRights25/05/22 09:17 PM
1

not with any of the evidence they bother to provide, no
/r/MensRights25/05/22 09:15 PM
3

and how did that go for them? Positively? They got support, like a female victim? Or were they told to stop taking the spotlight away from "Realtm" victims
/r/MensRights25/05/22 09:15 PM
2

yeah, i saw some of that, too. And then i saw the reaction they got, and realized #metoo has 0 good to it
/r/MensRights25/05/22 09:14 PM
1

Society uses mothers and control over childhood education to mold men into mules. The machine they hook the mules up to has a lot of carrots and sticks to keep the mules moving. That is tradition. The carrots (women) got a bit annoyed at being used as part of this machine, and hopped up into the passenger seat with the driver, leaving the mules to only deal with the Sticks. On top of that, the new passenger made up "Passengerism" that described the eternal oppression of carrots by mules, and dem…
/r/MensRights25/05/22 08:44 PM
3

yeah, its more about them appearing to support the actual victim, rather than actually doing so
/r/MensRights25/05/22 08:40 PM
0

That challenge is time wasted. "Yup, i'm a misogynist for thinking Depp is a victim and Amber is a violent domestic abuser! Oh, i guess i should look into all those other misogyny things, ya know, since i already am one" They want to conflate reasonable discussion and rational thought with bigotry and hatred? Let them. They'll be the ones dealing with the consequences in the end.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 08:24 PM
1

Other people don't differentiate. I may hate how some/most women act, and despise and hate how society allows them to act, but to people who call others misogynists, it's the same as hating X chromosomes itself. I don't bother arguing the point, they're gonna label you no matter what and your reasons mean shit.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 07:27 PM
3

Thank you to those who are welcoming to women in this movement, and to those who distrust and hate all women: Im sorry your life has shown you this to be true, and I hope one day this world will be more just. ... This may be the first time i've seen a woman acknowledge that the hatred/distrust of women has rational backing, and didn't phrase their "support" in a way that implied the man was wrong/defensive/insecure/sexist/delusional for thinking that way. ...not quite sure how to feel about that…
/r/MensRights25/05/22 07:22 PM
1

Some even hope or cheer for it, and promote that view on social media Truly vile
/r/MensRights25/05/22 06:42 PM
7

Also an rich thing to say for the gender that generally manipulates men to enact violence on their behalf
/r/MensRights25/05/22 05:29 PM
25

And switch between those two views depending on what is more advantageous to themselves at the moment
/r/MensRights25/05/22 05:16 PM
4

Thats exactly the narrative they want. Words are chosen carefully
/r/MensRights25/05/22 02:57 PM
1

Well, irrefutable proof AND being rich and famous AND having never actually defended yourself because doing so even once would have had this whole thing fall apart
/r/MensRights25/05/22 02:55 PM
5

OJ's wife wasn't on the stand, bit of a difference there It's unfortunate, but leaving your victim alive makes the court case much harder for you.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 02:52 PM
8

she doesn't need the money umm, yeah she does. These court cases aren't cheap. Her smear campaigns and bot armies aren't cheap (well, bots are for what they do, sure). AND she still has a $7 MILLION bill to a couple charities. ON TOP OF THAT: she's burned every bridge she has in the industry. No one except ultra feminist garbage will pick her up now, because no one except ultra feminist garbage will watch anything she's in. Edit: On top of THAT she has how she treats men in a relationship broadc…
/r/MensRights25/05/22 02:49 PM
8

Exactly, feminism is about class warfare. Warfare There are no rules in love and war Funny how that statement seems to cover anything a woman does that we might want to put rules on 🤔 If your enemy in war scores a victory, you don't acknowledge the victory. You immediately do whatever you can to minimize it and get a victory of your own. So, yes, they're waiting for it to be an honest-to-goddess "victory" (it's a defamation case, not DV, she still isn't being held responsible for being a domesti…
/r/MensRights25/05/22 02:47 PM
5

She didn't realize the entire facade was held up by a thin veneer of plausible deniability... that she stripped right off.
/r/MensRights25/05/22 02:41 PM
11

and those people are now transparent in their sexism, as well. Further damaging their reputation as believable people, as well of the reputation of all women ("oh they would never lie about that")
/r/MensRights25/05/22 02:41 PM
1

🤣 you don’t live in reality
/r/MensRights25/05/22 03:14 AM
1

Exactly, treating like men is misogyny (in their heads) They have studies on this, too. Women perceive genuine equal treatment as discrimination. And then will turn around and say with a completely straight face "Those with privilege are the most blind to it!"
/r/MensRights24/05/22 11:01 PM
3

Men valuing women more than men is kinda one of the issues we talk about a lot here
/r/MensRights24/05/22 11:00 PM
1

Pretty sure "Her truth" and "herstory" are their preferred modes of reality. Gaslighting is their default.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 10:57 PM
1

Or the increasingly common: "Look, we think Amber is a PoS, too! THAT MAKES US ON THE SAME SIDE. COME BE FEMINISTS" while promoting their own youtube channel asking for subs...
/r/MensRights24/05/22 10:54 PM
1

And you would know those are ancillary functions if you'd bothered to read. Prominent breast tissue while not lactating serve no purpose in humans other than attracting a mate. All of the other bullshit you just mentioned is true of all fat tissue, and you disingenuously pretended it was a feature of breasts.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 10:49 PM
1

And for more than just feeding babies, as they were selected to be large and prominent even when not feeding babies, something not found in other mammals.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 10:47 PM
1

Prominent breasts while not lactating are a uniquely human trait. They are our species version of Peacock Feathers. They are as much a fundamental sexual signal as cock or pussy.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 10:46 PM
1

Prominent breasts while not lactating is the human equivalent of Peacock feathers. It's a mating and attraction signal, it doesn't matter if they are the actual genitalia, they are central to our biological sexual identification systems. People not liking or wanting them to be sexual means jack shit. They are, just like how we breathe air. It's a fact of nature.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 10:40 PM
1

tbf... it's also an incredibly useful tool to identify trolls and bad faith actors or bots. I stand by everything i've posted (which is why it's still up) and i'm not afraid of some light stalking. It's the doxxing and trying to ruin your real life that's the problem.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 10:38 PM
4

Heads: I'm Right Tails: You're Wrong "Hmm, seems to be working just fine for me?" - feminist
/r/MensRights24/05/22 10:34 PM
2

Yup, i've been hit up with the "Are you thinking of suicide?" message more than a few times. I take it as a passive aggressive (feminist gold standard) "Go kill yourself" since saying the actual thing gets them negative attention now.
/r/MensRights24/05/22 10:28 PM
2

They used something called a Brain to look at all those steps and go "Gee, sure would be nice if i didn't have to waste all this time taking these steps, and could think up a way to get what i wanted done faster, easier, and with much less effort" The exact opposite mentality of "Just focus on one step at a time, you'll get there champ!" Thats the sound of abusive leaders trying to maintain the status quo
/r/MensRights24/05/22 02:58 PM
1

Specifically to avoid taking those steps. Innovation is the product of laziness
/r/MensRights24/05/22 02:50 PM
3

Sure there is. Grow up in a society where your blatant sexism isn’t punished and in many cases encouraged through constant social validation. Slay queen
/r/MensRights24/05/22 01:19 PM
1

Counterpoint: if our ancestors prioritized the big picture and weren’t held back by mental constructs like “just focus on the steps in front of you” we might have had the first car a lot sooner Edit: also, there were plenty of ways people figured out not to walk before the car came into play
/r/MensRights24/05/22 12:22 PM
3

Or realize the scale of the distance and drive like a thinking person
/r/MensRights24/05/22 11:40 AM
5

it is infinitely worse for a woman to be a victim than it is for a man Coulda stopped here, they honestly consider a woman's value to be infinity, and so any equation that includes women and men, women are weighting men out of the equation. Feminists won't have it any other way.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 09:21 PM
0

Or you could, instead of using the attention towards male dv victims to prop up your channel sub count Edit: No, seriously. Why isn't this post "Hey, because we give a shit, we started this charity to support people like depp!" instead of "Hey, here's a bunch of platitudes now watch our ads and smash that subscribe button!" Your own actions make your advice sound very disingenuous. And because /u/thegalasisters have BLOCKED me from responding after asking me a question. Here's the response: uh h…
/r/MensRights22/05/22 08:38 PM
1

I'd rather the current ones get fined into the ground for their sexism, and new non-sexist ones given their PUBLIC funding instead Edit: To clarify, i read your suggestion as about as dismissive as "Well why don't you go start your own police, if you feel they treat you so badly?"
/r/MensRights22/05/22 08:36 PM
1

Brain read 'they' as 'i', apologies
/r/MensRights22/05/22 08:35 PM
1

I did watch the video. And i disagree, the ones that seem to care still don't. This is PR to protect their brand.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 08:31 PM
37

You seem to be ignoring the possibility that they know full well, probably better than us, and just don’t give a fuck
/r/MensRights22/05/22 06:29 PM
2

Or they couldn’t come up with a not terrible sounding excuse to support a known abuser, they could have represented her other ex, after all.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 06:08 PM
2

I hope so too 🤞 People will finally turn and see meToo for the character assasination female abuse tactic that it is.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 06:07 PM
3

The cynic in me says if he hadn’t gotten this on tape he’d be in jail
/r/MensRights22/05/22 06:06 PM
1

We don’t know how you didn’t see it sooner, either. We’ve been talking about it here for years…
/r/MensRights22/05/22 06:05 PM
1

We can see how serious they are already. They won’t move their fat asses until court level evidence has been live-streaming for two weeks
/r/MensRights22/05/22 06:03 PM
1

Might? Part?
/r/MensRights22/05/22 06:02 PM
2

Yeah… I saw their press release. Did you notice how they couldn’t help shoehorning in how much women have it worse like 3 times? Once even outright? That is the most backhanded “support” I’ve ever seen. “Oh of course women fall down sometimes, too. Just know that men have it harder at all times always, but on those very rare exceptional circumstances where it has been proven in a live-streamed court of law cases where a women falls down, men will be there to help!” Seems pretty fucking hollow on…
/r/MensRights22/05/22 06:00 PM
39

I do not agree. A lot of women are looking at amber and seeing their main avenue of abuse and control come under public scrutiny, and scrambling to protect themselves and their power from more of it. Not the same thing as “empathizing”
/r/MensRights21/05/22 02:29 PM
8

But you’d lie about rape so someone else does it for you, then pat yourself on the back for being so “nonviolent”
/r/MensRights19/05/22 01:20 PM
15

Why is it so important to point out (entirely without evidence, btw) women have it worse? It's fucking child abuse, dude. Pretty easy to wrap it in one box and call it good. You sound like some asshole saying to a rape survivor "Yeah, but it's not the same as female rape. They go through much worse!" DID YOU HAVE A POINT OR DID YOU JUST WANT TO BRING THE FOCUS ON WOMEN, FFS. HOW ABOUT THIS ISN'T ABOUT YOU, ITS ABOUT CHILDREN BEING SEXUALLY MUTILATED.
/r/MensRights16/05/22 06:30 PM
123

Thus subverting the audience's expectations that what they were doing was OK, and throwing sharp focus onto the double standard. Me gusta
/r/MensRights16/05/22 06:27 PM
16

Coercive control, simple as that. It may have started with religion but it’s doing its own sexist thing now
/r/MensRights16/05/22 04:18 AM
12

Well, the way you said it makes womyn and white knights feel bad. The way THEY said it makes womyn seem helpless perfect victims of men again Tooootaly different /s
/r/MensRights16/05/22 03:37 AM
12

Society also wants to demand that men be strong And part of that is forcing them to be by not protecting them against those considered "weak", or letting/making them get hurt to "build character" Remember: Men's greatest weakness is the facade of strength, women's greatest strength is the facade of weakness. That "strength" facade is something forced onto men. You damn well better be strong, or else
/r/MensRights11/05/22 09:54 PM
1

Calling bullshit as someone with dyslexia you could totally have pasted that into the OpenDyslexia font yourself. Starting to think nothing you’ve said had been honest, and you’re just here trolling
/r/MensRights11/05/22 04:16 AM
1

And what is it those feminist influencers are doing? Is it… influencing?
/r/MensRights11/05/22 04:14 AM
2

Wait a minute, how come these extremists get a pass but one asshole with a gun calls himself an incel and suddenly all MRA’s are violent terrorists to feminists? There are far more extremists in feminism, how many can you wave away with “oh, those aren’t real feminists…”?
/r/MensRights11/05/22 04:12 AM
1

Yeah but that only matters if it's something women don't want, then it's men being sexist against women. If men do things women do want, it's just men acting as they should, and we can move on to the next womyn problem!
/r/MensRights10/05/22 06:02 PM
2

Most of what comes out of a feminist's mouth is projection. Lying about birth control is of course the first thing they'd accuse a man of.
/r/MensRights10/05/22 05:52 PM
1

When I was married my husband had a vasectomy and he experienced some sexual side effects that he still deals with So you married a man, convinced him to sterilize himself, he got side effects that affected his sex life, and then you left him. You not seeing the problem here?
/r/MensRights10/05/22 05:31 PM
2

Wanna know what'll really help your feeling ass raped by the woman you loved and the state you used to trust? Lets get everybody to laugh at it!
/r/MensRights09/05/22 07:05 PM
1

hours old that you don't remember, t Oh so you have a background in neurology and the development of consciousness? And understand the level of permanent damage a trauma at that age would cause a newborn mind? I'll repeat myself with a hard child-sexual-abuse-enabler block: Go Fuck Yourself.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 08:59 PM
1

Ok mr logical fallacy man. Abortion law review: “fucking over an entire gender” Mutilation of ONLY MALE children’s sex organs that is social encouraged and backed by state financing: “fucked over in some circumstances ” Gonna go with “Go fuck yourself” on this one.
/r/MensRights07/05/22 03:11 PM
9

Not just the 1900’s, every time period. It’s called the Apex fallacy. Feminists (and many others who make these claims) compare the average woman to what they believe is the average man at the time, but is in fact only the top fraction of the male population. They do the same thing with slavery when they pretend all white people were owning slaves in US south. It was actually a tiny fraction of people at the top of the social ladder, that had outweighed decision making power that they used to th…
/r/MensRights06/05/22 11:13 PM
13

but there ARE birth control for men but no one advertises it because they think the responsibility falls on women 🤣🤣 people's reproductive responsibility lands on themselves. Man or woman. The problem we have is women forcing their reproductive choices on men, not the other way around. The other way around is called Rape, and we have a whole other body of law dealing with that. But let that sink in. When it comes time for a MAN to take reproductive responsibility, the woman and the violence of t…
/r/MensRights06/05/22 10:06 PM
5

Agreed. More like society seem primarily focused on taking from men to women, and any suggestion that goes otherwise gets you some real stinkeye from people
/r/MensRights06/05/22 10:00 PM
8

Funny, they used the same "it's not the same!" completely bullshit logical fallacy rhetoric when feminists got the female genital mutilation ban put into place. It's making a comeback guys!
/r/MensRights06/05/22 09:59 PM
9

AND parenthood
/r/MensRights06/05/22 09:56 PM
9

because it prevents a lot of women from being equal to men Just wish that was a 2 way street. Millions of men under 50 might still have their foreskins.
/r/MensRights06/05/22 09:54 PM
3

yeah like, it's totally mathematically possible to calculate the expected risk to a woman from pregnancy, versus the expected risk to a man for child support (18 years forced to work in X industry) And in some situations the risk an average woman takes on for childbirth may be way higher than the child support risk for men. ...but not all. Lots of jobs have very high mortality rates. Ones that don't have a team of doctors and nurses fawning over him to make sure he gets through it ok, ready to j…
/r/MensRights06/05/22 09:52 PM
20

Yeah the 'credit' he gives to feminists is the same thing keeping men from having options
/r/MensRights06/05/22 09:49 PM
10

Was she suddenly on board with doing more to even it out? Ya know, since equality
/r/MensRights06/05/22 04:26 PM
3

You are incorrect in that your argument had 1) 0 evidence and based off your personal observations of humanity and evolution 2) easily disprovable by any of the numerous other things that were "biological realities" that we somehow managed to discourage and consider as wrong. Namely: Rape, murder, assault, child endangerment, child exploitation, child abuse, child sexual abuse, fraud, defamation, theft, trespassing... Huh.... looks to be just about everything. Everything about society seems to b…
/r/MensRights04/05/22 09:23 PM
3

Disagree. Maybe if they bore the weight of society alone like men have, we'd see a lot of these empathy gap issues addressed. There's so many "Welp, all the men are dead!" genre's that play up to female supremacy fantasies and they play with the idea of societal collapse, but people are largely doing just fine "yeah, we can do it without men!". Notice how there's no "Oh no! all the womyn died from a womyn only plague and we had to invent artificial wombs to keep the world going without womyn! Wh…
/r/MensRights04/05/22 09:11 PM
1

Doubt he is, but the gay community has a very "my way or the highway" attitude where if you disagree with even one thing you're an enemy of the whole movement. I already disagreed with that type of thinking in the first place, and so i am therefor anti-gay (despite not really giving a shit what gays do, whether they get married, who fucks who with whose cake, etc)
/r/MensRights04/05/22 09:08 PM
6

without understanding caring even slightly everything we had to do to get here FTFY
/r/MensRights04/05/22 09:03 PM
-3

Why wouldn't that rapist be in jail and why further would they then be given access to a child?
/r/MensRights04/05/22 08:59 PM
6

SHOULD. Yes. Totally agree. Problem is, we know they don't give a shit. By tying it to the thing they do give a shit about, there is a chance for them to realize the massive amount of hypocrisy in their behaviors and potentially change. And if abortion is 100% legal and available you can bet your bottom dollar feminists will suddenly be against parental surrender laws, if for no better reason than to deny them to men.
/r/MensRights04/05/22 08:57 PM
2

People who want a cowed and submissive population of males that are mentally damaged enough to be violent on command against some imagined "other"? Seems to fit the bill for politicians on any side of the aisle
/r/MensRights04/05/22 08:55 PM
4

Same as why we do it. Doing it before they can talk is just a way to conveniently get around the objections of the actual victim
/r/MensRights04/05/22 08:54 PM
5

And yet here most men in the USA sit with mutilated genitals. It's a little tone deaf to whine to men about not having rights in regards to your body autonomy
/r/MensRights04/05/22 07:41 PM
4

You're "confused false accusations" misses all of the "i don't want to accept the consequences of my actions, and would rather dump them on the most convenient man false accusations" Which would include things like "someone found out and now people make fun of me because he wasn't as impressive as i'd though, so it must have been rape" as well as "I had sex but i don't want people to judge me for it" accusations and "i need to cover for my cheating" accusations, etc. There's a whole 3rd category…
/r/MensRights04/05/22 07:29 PM
2

This has to be projection Of course it is, a feminist said it
/r/MensRights02/05/22 10:26 PM
1

I thought we were trying not to get married?
/r/MensRights02/05/22 01:09 PM
2

Thats a great attitude! I'm sure her divorce attorney will 100% agree.
/r/MensRights01/05/22 06:25 PM
1

/r/woosh
/r/MensRights01/05/22 06:17 PM
2

Why isn't it capped at the economic value of that work? They didn't provide any more than that, why are they receiving more? Edit: Prenups can get thrown out for "financial abuse" (aka: "He won't give me his money when i leave, i even agreed to it but it's unfair! He wouldn't marry me unless i did so it's coercive!" 😑 I so wish that was hyperbole. Not to mention it is basically a given that a prenup causes a fight "you're already planning on leaving me!? why won't you give the relationship a cha…
/r/MensRights01/05/22 06:05 PM
1

Hooker Upcharge: BabyMama (12mo minimum contract)
/r/MensRights01/05/22 06:03 PM
2

True, but what is the economic value of that? It does have one, and it's not "50% of your income". Anything above that might as well be theft with that logic
/r/MensRights01/05/22 06:01 PM
8

And then the politician being resentful of the beggars for having to do it at all, in the first place. Can't these beggars just realize what's good for them? Politicians care about beggars, too!
/r/MensRights01/05/22 04:17 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter