TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Infamous-Papaya-6346 Archive

View 5 posts and 151 comments by Infamous-Papaya-6346 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I have done my attempts before:- P1 When I was getting a response to criticism on gold digging behaviour and its threat to men, the AI is relatively restrained in its tone and bounces it back to men's choices. So I decided a little check, trying this point - women are unsafe and at risk in every place, due to compounding probability of meeting a dangerous individual. It seems it does not have as much of "qualms" to replies about men to an extent. It is stated as men are responsible. Well this ca…
/r/MensRights24/09/25 06:27 PM
1

complex systems (medicine, law, science, governance), have to tolerate dissent, correction, and be open to scrutiny. Without it, systems risk becoming hostile to scrutiny, driven by personal narratives rather than objective processes.
/r/MensRights24/09/25 05:56 PM
1

Well said
/r/MensRights24/09/25 12:15 PM
6

This is real clarity man
/r/MensRights23/09/25 04:38 PM
1

These benefits are part of a huge vicious cycle my dude. Unemployment and education are tributaries of this problem
/r/MensRights04/09/25 07:04 PM
1

The second hand pain is just crazy when I see these situations. I hope I don't find myself as first person scenario
/r/MensRights04/09/25 07:03 PM
3

That's cynical but eh can't say anything more. Fair point
/r/MensRights04/09/25 06:54 PM
1

So I don't not find see myself promoting oranges to any comparable degrees to bananas.
/r/MensRights04/09/25 06:36 PM
1

I don't disagree, I just find plenty on the other side. It's like there are bananas and oranges, but there is a vitamin c drive going on so only one is selling.
/r/MensRights04/09/25 06:34 PM
1

Well they do about as much harm as bottom 2-3% ethically. 10% is huge btw. It's also the same couple of %. Again a tougher nut to crack. I have considered it before, but you brought me back here again
/r/MensRights04/09/25 06:32 PM
2

Didnt feel like it. That was a personal jab
/r/MensRights04/09/25 06:22 PM
2

It's an amazing thing to tutor and help the boys get to the level they deserve to be, having their own focus.
/r/MensRights02/09/25 09:09 AM
2

They can kiss the alimony goodbye and have a no fault divorce
/r/MensRights02/09/25 09:01 AM
1

The otakus can get back into the workforce. A big win 🙃
/r/MensRights21/08/25 03:10 AM
3

I am unaware about the features mostly but teaonher seems to be a similar app to what you are building?
/r/MensRights21/08/25 03:08 AM
1

Well they exist, since killing exists and motives exist. But crimes are to be judged by motive not by optics for an effective law
/r/MensRights21/08/25 03:06 AM
1

The ultimate goal is satisfaction. It's also to have a map towards satisfaction, you need to have your own drive as well as a social pathway to it. Like the you know which field you can move towards and your peers are in it with you, rather than you blindly stumbling, which is a indicator of a sorry state of social pathway. Other things to be worked hard on are just vague to even me. I exist and I am satisfied, I expect no less and work towards a stable satisfaction level. You have to be satisfi…
/r/MensRights19/08/25 07:37 PM
2

Paternity fraud. Educational consideration that boys grow 1-2 years later in many cases. Proper action against false cases. Awareness of ROI on higher education. Among many others.
/r/MensRights15/08/25 05:16 PM
1

well either of us would be the ones crying blood if that happened to us. not so rofl then
/r/MensRights13/08/25 07:22 PM
1

"They deserve more!". And the accompanying yap
/r/MensRights13/08/25 06:44 PM
9

As Orwell said in Animal farm, all animals are equal but some are more equal. It's a terror, to be on a position to be pushed out to fit a quota
/r/MensRights13/08/25 06:39 PM
6

Quite the appalling issue. I find myself angry at media representation of these, even since my childhood.
/r/MensRights13/08/25 06:34 PM
2

From a personal standpoint, I do not see the child as the primary victim in any sense, because it simply is some wordplay that works to emotional appeal. Only when we recognise that the non father is the primary victim do we reach a position to legal change. The child is definitely an unfortunate Innocent but not the primary victim
/r/MensRights11/08/25 04:35 PM
1

I disagree on this regard. In fact women get their money quite lavishly in occasions of exploitation. Do a compensation is definitely required especially if work is affected and future prospects damaged
/r/MensRights11/08/25 04:32 PM
1

There is a thing such as DNA test and (responsibility which the court to no end enforces on men) which should be the sole criteria of such deception. If a woman wants to have another man's child within the marriage (I will not go into cucks here), it is her sole responsibility and can be easily backed up by DNA tests. It's a pretty brain dead law, and as far as I have seen it is also in several other countries with the same twisted logic. It is a major failing, one I believe has a very high rele…
/r/MensRights11/08/25 03:54 PM
1

Man, you just brought up what I precisely wanted to say. If we just take a closer look at the constitution, we will chance upon something called fundamental rights. I beleive there is a thing called right to dignity, and I don't see any dignity in being forced to pay for another man's child (or to put it bluntly monetary and personal exploitation). They should stop glorifying a 80 year old text being used to judge a world that's moved a change which cannot be fathomed in 80 years.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 03:46 PM
2

That's how law should be.
/r/MensRights11/08/25 03:41 PM
9

I mean this is what happens when move to feelings from data, like what is even going thru their minds when they say this and convince themselves. Tbh I feel it's a more perceived interest group thing rather than any actual substance
/r/MensRights08/08/25 05:14 AM
1

keep a target I guess in number of downloads. I mean even getting downloads and gaining popularity as a standard app is challenging and perhaps very time consuming also. i don't have much of an idea of actual stats for app success rates and timeframes.
/r/MensRights07/08/25 10:24 AM
2

That's a developmental pattern difference which is touted to be an impediment when it's not. It does not affect the end result of learning at all. Too much control or too little is a problem so let's think in that direction.
/r/MensRights04/08/25 06:21 PM
2

Does an indirect approach work, like building a utility app for men and once it rises you can add the utilities and features you want to
/r/MensRights04/08/25 05:52 PM
1

Please go for it.
/r/MensRights02/08/25 06:59 PM
7

Idk women are more emotional displaying and reading(or trying to) that's all that is I have seen, which might be the reason behind this misleading bias
/r/MensRights02/08/25 06:55 PM
2

Uhm this is the basics of politics and parties do make such false promises. I mean if you wish to read deeper into it, it is a somewhat religious mechanism for keeping non believers in the outer reaches and somewhat "incentivize" their cult
/r/MensRights02/08/25 06:51 PM
2

Indeed the love bombing being used as circumstantial justification is blasphemy if a guy tries it
/r/MensRights31/07/25 05:03 PM
2

That's a fresh perspective and I am amazed by the eerie fit it has with the femicide law
/r/MensRights31/07/25 01:54 PM
2

Some huge load of instinct leverage and propaganda
/r/MensRights31/07/25 01:40 PM
2

Reverend insanity vibes. The link between "interests" and this is quite surprisingly obvious now that I have read the comment
/r/MensRights31/07/25 01:32 PM
1

Female issues being far and above and larger is quite the stretch. The problem isn't only understanding women because women are not in much of a position to understand men. You should be aware that women are more socially oriented and thus in a better position to express or in the same vein be able to mislead on. In fact men also face a ton of tangible violence. Male issues are massive and growing, it is like a cancer you ignore cause it feels 1 stage but you never know when it will get to stage…
/r/MensRights31/07/25 01:25 PM
-1

opt out of voting if you think you can't help either way, if you haven't done so. the rest of your post well it is simply an out of control thing, the momentum will take at least 50 years to stop, by then we will be in matriarchy worst case scenario
/r/MensRights09/07/25 07:03 PM
1

well it's the ill design and the heavy emphasis on reading, beyond necessity I feel. a learning style diffrence could bring a huge change but I don't know where a beginning point would be in particular
/r/MensRights09/07/25 06:58 PM
1

some trash idea tbh. They make plenty of mistakes and are just as capable of being shitbags, nothing special about them
/r/MensRights09/07/25 04:08 AM
3

except too many end up in the lower end due to various reasons and increasing now
/r/MensRights28/06/25 10:23 AM
3

this is the most amazing thing I have ever seen to show this vibe
/r/MensRights26/06/25 06:27 AM
3

well I don't entirely agree. A real man would be one who does not have any impulse to escape masculinity or submit to feminine "superiority". Nor would he take any initiative to sabotage an entire group of men specifically to self benefit (be it real or perceived)
/r/MensRights26/06/25 06:24 AM
1

when feminism seized the growth period of technology
/r/MensRights25/06/25 12:19 PM
32

good point on relation aggression
/r/MensRights25/06/25 12:14 PM
10

no it won't backfire. the plan is curated well enough that men will end up being the "crash pad". in fact, the situation is being made that women will by default earn better than men because of educational fast-tracking and accountability removal.
/r/MensRights20/06/25 06:11 AM
1

absolutely. it's always the excess or the scarcity that harms
/r/MensRights20/06/25 06:07 AM
2

Hate is real, we just create terms to specify gender specific hate
/r/MensRights19/06/25 04:22 AM
1

again it is due to historical transitions that feminists are able to make their narrative work.
/r/MensRights19/06/25 04:20 AM
1

the patriarchy was a temporary matter and it was more of masculine oligrachy rather than anything else - with somewhat distorted religious beliefs before fixing. Now I mean it should be a meritocracy if anything, and about controlling wealth it is a futile matter which many great thinkers have struggled with
/r/MensRights19/06/25 04:19 AM
5

you can go the other way you are handing over your son to another's daughter
/r/MensRights19/06/25 04:10 AM
1

see my comment before on looking at photos
/r/MensRights19/06/25 04:08 AM
1

agreed excellent course of action
/r/MensRights17/06/25 07:22 AM
6

A lot of things will contribute, i mean the timescale is a bit too short, but we will see how lack of efforts towards education among men can lead to worse social outcomes and in cases increase in incidence of violence etc. The system will self perpetuate in this manner. We may observe the female affirmative stuff invaded every strata, after the pre 1990 gen has retired
/r/MensRights17/06/25 07:18 AM
1

so what about stem. talk law healthcare psychology veterinary care etc.
/r/MensRights17/06/25 07:03 AM
5

so just because there is overrepresentation in the top doesn't mean men as a w hole are doing well. more guys are falling behind
/r/MensRights17/06/25 07:02 AM
2

See the logical bias here is that you looked at a photo and said hey that's how it is. But life isn't a photo, it's more of a video and we try to extrapolate further rather than just looking at an instant to gain a meaningful insight
/r/MensRights17/06/25 07:01 AM
1

I mean you can see the sheer censure
/r/MensRights17/06/25 06:58 AM
1

it's literally all around the world
/r/MensRights17/06/25 06:57 AM
11

STEM quotas shouldn't be a thing at all, it undermines male merit a lot
/r/MensRights16/06/25 12:36 PM
3

it's nothing bad unless picked up by the wrong people
/r/MensRights16/06/25 12:36 PM
30

what sort of hot garbage am I seeing
/r/MensRights16/06/25 07:49 AM
3

Often seen in movies and criminal accusations. The possibility of the man being innocent and the sheer damage caused by it is high and it is not even some unknown phenomenon and verified well. So what is the justification in the violation of privacy
/r/MensRights16/06/25 07:42 AM
3

Illusion of masculinity? What sort of nonsense is saying that to a man? Like saying if you have testosterone, then take hormone blockers. Dominance is a position based thing and manifests differently between men and women. Oppression is also not anything male specific, simply overstated. The strength of men is objectivity not subjectivity in general, and one would be nuts to think if objectivity was fluid
/r/MensRights16/06/25 07:34 AM
2

I meant to say that they will always receive more benefits...by crook or hook
/r/MensRights16/06/25 07:25 AM
3

TT
/r/MensRights15/06/25 05:56 PM
1

Pride is something that's not that one dimensional tbh. Pride is not anything negative, in fact I would prefer to call it a neutral force with just a higher margin of error. Can I say pride is the emotional core of confidence? I don't know. Does it affect confidence? Yes. Something that can be parallel to it is ambition, easy to be led stray. On the other hand, it is a positive message
/r/MensRights15/06/25 05:49 PM
1

I mean this will start to affect women long term unless government steps up even more and goes ahead to introduce the tax of being a man or being single. I mean it's crazy dystopic so take it with a pinch of salt. Realistically feminists will later step up to word games and media control and call it the loneliness epidemic and then make it exclusively female perspectives.
/r/MensRights15/06/25 05:37 PM
1

I mean my honest opinion is that the image versions are free enough? depends on the author more than anything. So if this is increasing you can safely say more authors are falling for this shit. I don't know what percentage of the mangas get representation in anime form tbh. (Casual reader)
/r/MensRights15/06/25 05:31 PM
3

I never related the two, interesting.
/r/MensRights15/06/25 03:04 AM
27

who would have thought? the manosphere has a higher concentration of 'unrestricted' speech compared to irl. I dont think any proper study can actually quantify how many 'haters' are present. majority are just ppl who look out for themselves and others.
/r/MensRights14/06/25 09:55 AM
10

'believe all females' 😵‍💫
/r/MensRights14/06/25 06:36 AM
1

that's something we can't easily decide upon. I personally think degrees are more paying in the long term, but yes the volatility is comparatively higher due to the debt problem, starting off with a ton of uncertainty about the debt amount. Will there be a long term disadvantage due to lack of degree in terms of financial capacity? Will degree holders be 'winning'? Hard to say. The change is too fast for any comments. Will salaries for degree requirement jobs decline? Will they improve? Can taki…
/r/MensRights14/06/25 06:16 AM
7

a good point indeed. women have a capacity for evil that is simply like comparing apples to oranges to men's capacity for it
/r/MensRights13/06/25 05:25 PM
4

you can check out my post comparing religious parallels https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1labucs/questionable_comparisons_but_worth_considering/
/r/MensRights13/06/25 05:17 PM
1

again it is just a matter of time. poor people in general have poor lives. to say it bluntly
/r/MensRights13/06/25 02:56 PM
4

it's an oligarchy, rather than a patriarchy. as for your statement that it does not take away men's rights, it adds to women's rights so much that it creates the status imbalance as stated in the patriarchy narratives in the opposite direction. For example female exclusive scholarships in fields where they dominate are somehow acceptable? say you give somebody 50 and 30 in development where 20 is the xtra development quota, when does it end and how is equality defined. think about the snowballin…
/r/MensRights13/06/25 12:20 PM
0

it's simple dna damage rate I believe, and because of the x chromosome damage mitigation in women
/r/MensRights13/06/25 10:20 AM
3

parasites that sucked enough blood and went to a manufactured blood pool now
/r/MensRights13/06/25 10:13 AM
1

you are comparing now, sure, what about the future. let me ask you what in the future do you have as a man, you won't get targeted scholarships amazing! you will be alone on average amazing! you will walk on eggshells everywhere amazing!
/r/MensRights13/06/25 10:11 AM
6

it does not, ofc not as whole, just like how any social movement works. it is only about the actual outcomes that should matter not the intent. if the outcomes disadvantage men they do. ask yourself where men will be in 30 years rather than arguing about male advantage now, because now itself we can see female advantage majority in younger generation
/r/MensRights13/06/25 10:07 AM
2

till what time, when will the disadvantage 'end'. What qualified as the disadvantage ending are all questions that will never be answered, I mean if we get to see some serious matriarchy development in usa etc we will see some resistance from India. The problem is we are going too fast to see a step by step removal and proper action
/r/MensRights13/06/25 10:04 AM
4

get rid of scholarship is the right way and any reservations
/r/MensRights13/06/25 09:59 AM
2

it's the punishment they will be asked to deliver where it will vary like day and night tbh. everyone will say it's nuts, but at the end of the day the consequences matter
/r/MensRights13/06/25 09:57 AM
2

let's talk about progress and progress rates. women get benefits at rate higher than men, and that is a compounding advantage, much like your snowball rolling down the hill. Of course we won't see it now, because looking at an acceleration time graph will not give a distance credibly. arguments only focus on progress rather than the rate, so I find it problematic
/r/MensRights13/06/25 08:35 AM
2

it's a consequence of privilege manifesting, the sheer lack of responsibility and artificially created outcomes for the name of equity. among them is the demonization of men or lack of respect towards men.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 05:27 AM
1

It's more of the forced equity drive rather than any independence I believe. A woman can earn, but it should be for exactly how much she works and the maternity leave reduced salary. Statistically, men will be found at extremes of various parameters often, eg income of course excluding women who don't work for salary or stay at home. (counted to be 0).
/r/MensRights12/06/25 05:23 AM
1

you don't have to go obese here, just looking at 5/10 +- 1/10 you can find someone, admittedly it is a gamble to find a person with similar values/long term attraction to yourself. The most sought after ones by appearance all in the 8+ range, with a few 7s and fewer going down.
/r/MensRights12/06/25 05:11 AM
1

listen up you don't have the idea of something called systemic privilege, which automatically disabled a lot of these things. The members also don't band by region to region basis, so the action taken depends upon how much influence or power the individual has here in this subreddit
/r/MensRights11/06/25 01:05 PM
2

it should always be about tolerance and compatibility
/r/MensRights11/06/25 12:59 PM
1

also gave huge productivity rise, which shows itself in the population boom
/r/MensRights11/06/25 12:57 PM
1

the marriage system in it's idealistic format gave men a biological satisfaction of not a psychological one as well, some certainty of paternity, and a functional unit as such. this is only with regards to a nuclear family, joint families are different and present their unique advantages. ofc my statement ignores all human 'sin' as such.
/r/MensRights11/06/25 12:57 PM
2

that's because the government has become the new 'provider' here along with the media and law to help them breeze through education (breeze is relative to men). the rate at which females get formal help is high enough that the narrative may turn on its head in a fifty years. I don't want to be apologetic to live in a truly equal society. any equity movement should have a goal and clear stopping point "brakes" if you will. they don't actually need to do anything constructive, because they already…
/r/MensRights11/06/25 12:48 PM
1

From the second pic, smalledge doesn't reach the mark either. From a broad systemic perspective women are privileged(in developed countries) and are rapidly blowing past equality on several parameters. few men may have true privilege and that is from wealth or connections. Fourth pic, feminists do not consider men's issues or have a perfunctory action regarding it, just for the lookers as a whole. Radical feminists are their unruly kids who bully people, and get away with a slap on the wrist, wh…
/r/MensRights11/06/25 12:41 PM
3

they do?
/r/MensRights11/06/25 11:46 AM
3

I mean if you look far enough the foundations lie in radical feminist in the old feminist movement 1980s may be or even further back
/r/MensRights11/06/25 11:36 AM
1

blind asf perspective. men are more privileged???? look at the rate where men progress and women progress. in 10 years we can see who is where. look properly
/r/MensRights10/06/25 06:12 AM
3

it's more of a moral degeneration rather than a tactic
/r/MensRights10/06/25 05:13 AM
2

Erosion of merit and accountability showing itself. Must have been a trashy experience for him, hope he is in a better position now. Even speaking about the mod policy here is not taken as feedback
/r/MensRights09/06/25 04:47 PM
1

This article is a link from the abstract first article, a little more concrete issue raised https://www.richardhanania.com/p/womens-tears-win-in-the-marketplace He himself fails to recognise what men's rights is for in this article however.
/r/MensRights09/06/25 03:36 PM
13

yes. it's quite a unreasonable narrative which may have a few buyers, but the outcomes it can create is insane in the long term. Gendered investing is a violation of the right to equality, right to dignity and right to equal opportunities
/r/MensRights09/06/25 10:59 AM
14

It's not reasoned like that. It's more of getting a girl because the child is one. Devaluation of boys bluntly. It's pretty disgusting tbh.
/r/MensRights09/06/25 10:55 AM
1

to keep it short, progress is what you pointed out, progress rates are more determined over a time period. (progress done in an interval of time) it's just like seeing a photo of a car and guessing its speed.
/r/MensRights09/06/25 10:49 AM
1

That's a separate issue of healthcare infrastructure and law. It gets really bad in some places, because of the lack of hospitals etc. Arrest for these situations is probably the result of outdated laws. Progress rates here is a long term thing, look again in a few years a change will be made once the complaint arises. Progress is what you refer to in your statement, rate is how the progress changes with respect to time. What has happened in a hundred years now vs what has happened in the kingdo…
/r/MensRights09/06/25 10:47 AM
2

agreed. it's more or less a standard type of article, just picked one of its kind. its type doesnt fall under censoring.
/r/MensRights09/06/25 03:04 AM
0

Fear can be a even a natural consequence of scenarios where their futures are limited, they can have a 'feeling' for it but not as a reasoned argument.
/r/MensRights09/06/25 03:00 AM
2

fair enough. it's more pragmatic to write a counter article to the rather one sided view of this article.
/r/MensRights09/06/25 02:58 AM
2

indeed
/r/MensRights08/06/25 04:02 AM
1

not really. its the idea of doing what is relevant to oneself. I don't believe he particularly refers to the women who are at the lower strata of income, rather than the ones at the middle class which is much more relevant to him. women in the middle class get equitized fairly heavily, so it gains much more relevance
/r/MensRights08/06/25 04:01 AM
1

the key here is unaccountability
/r/MensRights08/06/25 03:55 AM
2

think about living at gunpoint and if you get shot nobody gives a damn in the courts. the gun is owned by an unaccountable party. see what you like? that's what he is worried about
/r/MensRights08/06/25 03:55 AM
1

Can account to an extent for different developmental levels and try to level the educational field
/r/MensRights08/06/25 03:27 AM
1

red shirting? what do you think of it, and squeezing a couple of grades into one
/r/MensRights07/06/25 03:59 AM
1

they wanted a kid(outcomes) but needed it in a month, so they made 9 women pregnant(policies) but kids always take 9 months(societal change isn't a racecar) now we are just waiting for the 9 babies to come out(biased outcomes). That's what you get from a power based movement
/r/MensRights07/06/25 03:55 AM
1

self reporting bias rarely comes the other way round it seems....
/r/MensRights07/06/25 03:50 AM
0

it's both biological and cultural in the victimhood vibe
/r/MensRights07/06/25 03:49 AM
8

it cannot be, otherwise feminism should just change its name to equalism. it also has mingled with power, un and other international organisations to create the perception of a much greater female disadvantage and a non serious issue of male disadvantage. the new age religion of sorts if you will, just like today's marriage vs earlier marriage
/r/MensRights07/06/25 03:48 AM
-8

Both sides claim the other uses it interestingly enough.
/r/MensRights04/06/25 10:52 AM
4

indeed. but again a comfortable and fulfilling life, not a struggle for ends meeting
/r/MensRights04/06/25 10:49 AM
4

alpha beta is thing defined with much regards to women rather than being a men centric thing. I don't think it should be used as a good basis...
/r/MensRights31/05/25 05:57 PM
2

And again on your adaptation point - i disagree it is not the sole factor here a lot of things are being engineered for them at present. So from a analogy perspective it is a mixture of both adaptation and genetic engineering (just an analogy)
/r/MensRights30/05/25 02:23 PM
3

Interesting take though I think we're looking at the issue from fundamentally different frames: I’m analyzing systems, while you’re describing personal adaptation. So sure your view surely works
/r/MensRights30/05/25 02:19 PM
2

of course it will it is basically at a conflict with biology when marrying a low earning man. just saying our general patterns are dictated by biology while specific patterns by rationality
/r/MensRights30/05/25 01:58 PM
4

you can't refuse a bigger picture in this regard, wealth is flowing at an alarming rate to women in the society by welfare policies by governments and international organisations. This directly creates a larger pool of deprived men who will be termed useless and incapable when they are just unable to rise because of an artificial ceiling created by the "welfare". Advantages are being built here in real time, again yes as to how it translates to your comment, it is about finding the suitable woma…
/r/MensRights30/05/25 01:57 PM
12

engineering is getting equity quotas, so it's more of a shirking hard labour/ responsibility. carpentry, plumber, garage mechanic many things that don't really get enthusiastic attention from the feminist movement
/r/MensRights30/05/25 01:49 PM
2

super vulnerable - lmao. It's wrong on so many levels to glorify this shithead
/r/MensRights30/05/25 01:45 PM
8

I will just say it's how biology seems to work. Men are easily exploited and rationality stands in the way of exploitation. You see our environment itself is shitty for man, we are supposed to live in a small city level settlement at this point, our brains can't comprehend mega large society and we suffer the consequences. There you can control some order and people actually understand that they depend on each other. Any bigger you get an insensitivity problem
/r/MensRights25/05/25 02:07 PM
4

I do not deny it, but I would ask how we can do anything to legal bias and in extreme cases false cases with indifference
/r/MensRights20/05/25 12:55 PM
7

It will simply make our lives harder. It is a self perpetual machine that is based on seizing benefits without responsibility
/r/MensRights20/05/25 12:37 PM
11

It's just a matter of women thinking if they are well then society is well. the key flaw is responsibility privilege. Again you may hear women put down other women, that's just a selective thing. It is a matter of individual jealousy/dislike/whatever. Group benefits are never denied by them, and you can see the result. Must say it is a reflection of a currently misplaced tribal instinct (women=society).
/r/MensRights20/05/25 07:54 AM
1

It is unfortunate and not something that can be addressed easily. The best choice is to have a complete shared ethos, it's easy to say but it's an uphill battle. A separate concern is about maintaining a stance against something as draining as people who create their own "logic" and somehow make every problem about themselves. Eg A man dying apparently hurts the woman the most while the death in itself is an afterthought relative to it
/r/MensRights20/05/25 07:41 AM
2

The book is radical to say the very least. I would agree if humans didn't have a shred of intelligence. Intelligence can override some basic instincts and possibly give counters to subconscious response. Again I have to say we are still very irrational in our thoughts and that the underlying arguments about feminism trends are reasoned. What I took away is that they want women to have power while men bear responsibility, both being mutually exclusive.
/r/MensRights20/05/25 07:23 AM
1

for those of you wondering why you can't find the article linking to the un aid - it has been removed (probably because they haven't moved to the complete society control stage). So here s an article showing that it indeed happened https://archive.ph/cujiz
/r/MensRights19/05/25 05:20 AM
1

Internet allows information spread of all kinds - so I mean the male disposability can be amplified by the simple action of apathy in content. Human rights were also supposed to deal with these problems, I don't know particularly how much they speak about it.
/r/MensRights19/05/25 05:10 AM
2

Of course I plan to push for these reforms but I just don't find it worthwhile to argue with feminists about false cases. The whole feminist network and their validating sources are extremely high so I will have to be hitting at a reinforced wall. I don't believe they will have much to say about creating more humane conditions before finding any evidence of guilt. I believe a few attempts would have already made to file PILs in the supreme court for false case issues, it's not just working out.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 06:36 PM
1

Don't bother then I never asked you to understand
/r/MensRights13/05/25 11:26 AM
1

I am not particularly keen on creating a doctrine or anything nor am I a scholar who has organised his facts into thesis so mind it
/r/MensRights13/05/25 11:05 AM
1

what word salad are you talking about? what is it that you want to say?
/r/MensRights13/05/25 11:01 AM
1

an idea of a collective benefit or a movement with more homogeneity as a central body. I must clarify what I mean by homogeneity it is about having a clear idea that draws the group all together
/r/MensRights13/05/25 10:38 AM
1

please don't bring the men staying silent bullshit here, it's literally a vast majority of humans who are bystanders. Women get away with whatever bullshit they do with a lighter sentence even
/r/MensRights13/05/25 07:36 AM
1

the in group preference is something I wish to build upon. any ideas?
/r/MensRights13/05/25 07:32 AM
45

well said it is a coordinated suicide, but I find it more dangerous than that, men will be kept on their last ropes with a few male "leaders" as figureheads to keep the patriarchy narrative alive. Women will have a vast percentage of wealth at the current rate of feminization of workplace and legal benefits. I sincerely hope I am wrong about what I say and that we don't head towards a female led dystopia
/r/MensRights13/05/25 07:10 AM
6

that's absolutely absolute way of saying it
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates13/05/25 05:46 AM
1

personally i find it to be a unity problem, for example i hope to be part of a large unity based men focused only community which can cover a very large chunk of men on reddit. I find it to be a crawling step to undoing the feminist changes that demean men and have infiltrated into several strata of social institutions. so here the key is unity we men need to have one mind about a single idea at the very least that can push us towards a better future together.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 05:44 AM
1

Agreed
/r/MensRights13/05/25 04:59 AM
1

our worth is inevitably in somebody else hands... especially if you are a victim. just look at the critiquing feminism website, they give data on how haiti recieved un aid only of rowmen
/r/MensRights13/05/25 04:31 AM
8

thank you for posting it, it just really shows the bone deep hypocrisy and it just makes me wonder. if young children are going to be indoctrinated in this propaganda
/r/MensRights13/05/25 04:24 AM
3

You are simply ignoring the timeframe of these changes, i mean go back two generations and tell them this happened they will laugh at you. Society does not change in fifty years on a fundamental scale and you are promoting a fundamental change. You are simply pouring 1 ton of oil into a car engine and asking to move at the speed of a jet. and the most important point is I will never trust a movement called feminism to help men. Just call it egalitarianism at the very least.
/r/MensRights13/05/25 04:01 AM
38

This interview somehow felt normal...idk how to say it...haven't really heard one person interview before
/r/LeftWingMaleAdvocates12/05/25 12:59 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter