TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

InstaPiggyBacon Archive

View 2 posts and 134 comments by InstaPiggyBacon on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
45

False AccusationInstaPiggyBacon/r/MensRights14/08/17 08:47 PM
0

InstaPiggyBacon/r/MensRights09/08/17 07:01 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Edgy
/r/MensRights17/08/17 08:13 PM
1

No. Rape is sex without consent. Consent is agreeing to sex when the option to decline is available.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 07:35 PM
1

Dunno, and don't care enough to check the statistics (and I'd have to know how you define "poor"). Does it matter though? Poor people adequately provide for their kids all the time. Hell, my parents probably qualified as "poor" when I was a kid.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 07:31 PM
1

That's a decision every parent would have to make for themselves. Personally, I waited until I was financially stable to have kids. That doesn't mean it would be the right decision for everyone.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 06:46 PM
2

I don't think it's fair to lump single mothers into one group and paint them all with the same broad brush. Rather, we should evaluate and advise people as individuals. And any biological parent who realizes that they are unable to adequately provide for their child and gives the child up for adoption instead, has likely done one of the most selfless and loving things that any parent can do for their child.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 05:25 PM
2

Because the post by /u/tharkyliinus seemed to indicate that underage individuals are incapable of consent. Pointing out that no one pitches a fit when they're consenting to another 15 year old means that everyone recognizes that 15 years old actually are capable of consent.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 12:07 AM
1

Yes, absolutely.
/r/MensRights17/08/17 12:05 AM
2

Of course not. There still needs to be meaningful consent, of course. Just like you need meaningful consent if you're going to have sex with a 20 year old, 25 year old or 50 year old who doesn't understand the ramifications of their actions.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 09:03 PM
3

It seems more like you were perplexed by the inconsistency in your view presented by my question, so you deflected rather than answered.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 08:44 PM
2

Does it really matter why she disobeyed a stupid law? The fact of the matter is, the law was stupid so we changed it. And that's the same approach we should be taking today.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 08:43 PM
3

I'd rather see laws change so that consensual sex isn't punishable as rape.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 08:42 PM
3

You're the one asking the question. If someone texts you some random bitterness about this issue, maybe you should be asking them for solutions rather than asking some random folks on the internet. No?
/r/MensRights16/08/17 08:29 PM
3

So you're looking for a solution to children who grow up not knowing who their father is? Looking for a solution implies that there is a problem. What reasons do you think this is a problem? Is it a similar problem when children grow up not knowing who their mother is? Do we need a solution for that as well?
/r/MensRights16/08/17 08:10 PM
4

That is irrelevant to my post. I'm merely trying to figure out what you're asking and why you're asking the question. You ask how for solutions. I'm left wondering, solutions to what?
/r/MensRights16/08/17 07:52 PM
5

Can you clarify what you mean by "blame"? What is to blame? Do we also need to figure out who is to blame for two parent households, or interracial marriage or why some people are gay? What are we seeking blame for and, if we're able to identify someone(s) to take the blame, what's our next move? What is the objective?
/r/MensRights16/08/17 07:36 PM
3

Oh, gotchya. Back in 1955 we had some bad laws that needed changing. But now we've got that all fixed right up and all our laws are perfect now! Cool.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 07:34 PM
2

So two 15 year olds are incapable of having a consensual, sexual relationship?
/r/MensRights16/08/17 07:24 PM
4

There was a time when the law told Rosa Parks to sit in the back of the bus. We got that ridiculous law changed. Rather than trying to get more people locked up for longer periods in overcrowded prisons for having consensual May-December relationships, we should look to modify the laws.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 07:23 PM
-1

but when it comes to girls Clearly you haven't read my other comments in this thread.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 07:21 PM
0

Would you ask this question of a 40-year-old male teacher having sex with his 15-year-old female student? Yes. And that is my point. We need to stop demanding that women be punished as harshly as men for consensual sex and start demanding that consensual sex not be punished.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 07:06 PM
1

Is there more information available that led you to that conclusion. The linked image provides virtually no context.
/r/MensRights16/08/17 07:05 PM
-13

So you believe this was nonconsensual?
/r/MensRights16/08/17 05:24 PM
4

97% of alimony payers are men. I'm sure that's not due to bias though. I mean, how could it be?
/r/MensRights16/08/17 05:23 PM
0

Direct link: https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2017/aug/14/guys-stop-making-a-fuss-being-a-man-couldnt-be-easier
/r/MensRights15/08/17 05:19 PM
3

You can support (what are perceived as) some liberal causes. Most here support gay rights, for example. The concept of individual freedoms and lack of interference from the government is pretty consistent with Men's Rights. So when it comes to some social issues, the traditionally "liberal" side makes sense to a lot of folks here. But where liberalism breaks down in the United States is the Democratic Party's blind pandering to feminists. And feminists are fighting for the exact opposite of what…
/r/MensRights15/08/17 05:17 PM
1

It seems like saying that research is invalid because of the gender of the people doing the research could be considered a sexist attitude if one were so inclined to perceive it as such.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 03:47 PM
10

What I got from that article is that 3 out of 4 women are dating guys who just aren't that into them.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 03:40 PM
2

If you've got solutions to some of the world's problems, by all means, implement those solutions! No one is holding you back.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 03:03 PM
3

Without context, it is tough to know. Someone could certainly say "thanks for mansplaining" as a method to mock feminists who think every time a man talks it is mansplaining.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 03:01 PM
-4

I understand. I think archive links are stupid and petty. The fact that this particular user posts an archive link in damn near every thread annoys the fuck out of me, so when it does it in my threads, I'll tell him to fuck himself. If I wanted to post an archive link, I would have posted an archive link. I've taken to posting direct links to articles in situation where he's posted an archive link.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 12:14 AM
1

Direct Link: http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/nsw/australian-army-bans-male-recruits-to-get-female-numbers-up/news-story/69ee9dc1d4f8836e9cca7ca2e3e5680a
/r/MensRights14/08/17 08:56 PM
1

Direct link: https://www.yahoo.com/news/female-hollywood-directors-want-quotas-diversity-114725788.html
/r/MensRights14/08/17 08:56 PM
-18

fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 08:54 PM
2

It's irrelevant to me. Live your own life. If it doesn't affect me, I'm not going to manufacture a way for it to affect me.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 08:13 PM
1

I'm not really a boob guy, so I don't find it particularly distracting. I probably react similar to the way I would react when some dude has his beer gut hanging out from under his wife beater. Just slightly disgusted, but whatevs - doesn't really affect my life.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 08:11 PM
3

Why? (If your title is supposed to explain why, I missed it in your title gore).
/r/MensRights14/08/17 08:08 PM
-1

Yeah... that video doesn't show a man hitting a woman. Only implies it.
/r/MensRights14/08/17 07:45 PM
1

If two rooms were set aside, one for men and one for women, and both had the same equipment, then that would be equal. No. It would be close to equal, but not equal. Equal does not mean identical 2.0=/=2.000000000000000001 Equal does men identical.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 01:55 AM
1

Because separate can't be exactly equal. If the gym is women only from 2pm-4pm on August 11, 2017, then it can't be men only from 2pm-4pm on August 11, 2017. It would have to be men only at some other time. And that may be very close to equal, but it isn't equal.
/r/MensRights12/08/17 01:47 AM
1

Jim Crow disagrees
/r/MensRights12/08/17 01:18 AM
5

ask for a similar male-only section? Separate, but equal, isn't equal.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 10:50 PM
1

Good general guideline: If you model the way you act and treat people after the way Donald Trump acts and treats people, you're a jerk.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 10:20 PM
1

Oh, I'm serious honey. If you do the things you claim you're doing, you are absolutely an asshole.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 10:16 PM
11

Whose gonna pay for the baby? Sometimes people really don't think beyond the short term.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 08:34 PM
3

Where was I exaggerating? No matter how you slice this, you come off as an asshole.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 08:21 PM
3

There isn't a favorable example. So rather than running and pointing "man with his dick cut off! man with his dick cutoff", maybe you just whisper to your buddy behind the person's back "pssst... hey... that chick over there; that's just a man with his dick cut off". Still an asshole.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 07:56 PM
4

Yeah. If you know some guy has had his dick cut off, and you run around pointing at him yelling "Man with his dick cut off! Man with his dick cut off!" you're pretty much a textbook definition of an asshole. Lance Armstrong had a testicle removed due to cancer. If someone goes to a book signing and starts pointing at him say "dude's only got one ball, let's call him Ace!", you don't think that guy is kind of an asshole? Because he is.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 07:24 PM
5

Of course I wouldn't say that. Men that wear dresses aren't assholes by default. People who intentionally antagonize others because of how they choose to be, even when it has zero impact on others, are assholes by default.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 06:43 PM
1

Direct Link: http://www.bbc.com/news/business-40894089
/r/MensRights11/08/17 06:18 PM
3

They all came off as somewhat neurotic.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 06:16 PM
2

Direct link: https://www.vox.com/first-person/2017/8/10/16119334/female-coders-tech-students-respond-sexist-google-memo
/r/MensRights11/08/17 06:11 PM
1

In cases like this, I always say there is not victim here. Thank god a judge has finally started saying pretty much the same thing! Morgan County Circuit Judge Glenn Thompson said the court found the statute 'unconstitutional' and that there was no proof Witt used her position of authority to force the two students to have sex. The judge noted that state law allows students to legally have sex at age 16, as long as someone doesn't use their position of authority to obtain that consent. Judge Tho…
/r/MensRights11/08/17 06:06 PM
7

You can be an asshole if you want, but if you end up with nothing but other assholes around you, don't come crying to us. I doubt you would though, assholes of your ilk tend to prefer hanging with other assholes.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 06:02 PM
1

Direct link: https://www.glamour.com/story/conservative-millennial-women-and-feminism
/r/MensRights11/08/17 05:45 PM
1

Direct link: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/11/opinion/sundar-pichai-google-memo-diversity.html
/r/MensRights11/08/17 05:41 PM
2

people believe that because feminists have intentionally spread misinformation; especially on college campuses. The linked question is ridiculous because it is unanswerable based upon the information she provided. She never indicated whether she consented or not. If she didn't consent, it was rape. If she consented, it was regret.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 05:37 PM
-23

stop spamming this
/r/MensRights11/08/17 12:10 AM
38

Honestly, I don't know if they're more fragile or if they are just more conditioned by society to paint themselves, and see themselves, as a victim.
/r/MensRights11/08/17 12:04 AM
72

::triggered::
/r/MensRights10/08/17 11:28 PM
-2

I know what it is, I'm still tired of seeing it spammed on every damn thread.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 11:23 PM
3

Hannah Norman wrote: "I cant believe they have stopped a session that enables women the opportunity to feel safe and confident. How ridiculous. They should have just made a men-only session too." Yeah. Just have a men's only session. WCGW?
/r/MensRights10/08/17 08:26 PM
0

Stop spamming this.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 08:26 PM
0

Stop spamming this.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 08:24 PM
8

I remember Peter Goett entirely unironically posting a reply to a list with over 10,000 Googlers: “congratulations on your white penis.” To my understanding, had someone posted “black vagina”, that person would have been summarily fired. Also to my understanding, Goett appears to have received no punishment. Sounds like a hostile work environment lawsuit waiting to happen.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 08:24 PM
349

I think part of it is that men are much more likely to "get over it" than women are - especially women self-identifying as feminists. How many times have you been called a "faggot" or a "pussy" or a "dick" in your life? And when that happens - especially if it is in an anonymous online format - do you categorize that as "sexual harassment"? I sure as hell don't. But feminists (and maybe women overall) get called a "slut", or a "lesbo" or a "cunt" and they categorize that as 'sexual harassment" i…
/r/MensRights10/08/17 08:18 PM
2

"Legislators have taken the teacher portion out of the equation," Stephen R. Allred, a defense attorney with Zabriskie Law Firm, told KUTV. "I don't consider this a loophole. These 16 and 17 year olds do have a choice, and they have chosen to engage in this." Yep. No victim here.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 08:09 PM
3

I'm guessing stealthing happens the same place those rainbow lipstick parties do.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 04:15 PM
6

Stealthing is awesome! Get those bitches pregnant and then pay them off for the next 18 years! Why wouldn't guys stealth????
/r/MensRights10/08/17 04:15 PM
1

what industry?
/r/MensRights10/08/17 04:13 PM
1

Direct link: http://www.hindustantimes.com/tv/are-the-misleading-promos-of-pehredaar-piya-ki-a-publicity-stunt/story-HBnY9MEirxWCuuy0gfmeFO.html
/r/MensRights10/08/17 04:10 PM
0

Stop spamming this.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 02:13 PM
-14

Stop spamming this.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 02:07 PM
-11

Stop spamming this.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 02:05 PM
1

Because it doesn't matter, for starters. The 24 people who click that link from this post aren't going to make a difference. The big reason, however, to avoid archive links is that it masks the source of the link (until you actually click on it). With the way I linked it, you can clearly see that the link is from medium.com. Once you know that, you can choose to click it because it is of interest to you, or you can choose to move on to the next thread because you have a low opinion of medium.com…
/r/MensRights10/08/17 01:01 PM
2

Yes, but my thread title expressed that the link left me speechless. Having been speechless, I was unable to provide a descriptive thread title. Carry on.
/r/MensRights10/08/17 12:58 PM
2

Unnecessary. If I wanted to post it as an archive link, I would have.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 11:08 PM
7

“I need to look into the Equality and Sex Discrimination Acts as I do not believe that they were made for this reason" LOL. She's not wrong.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 08:34 PM
-8

Stop spamming this shit on every damn post!
/r/MensRights09/08/17 07:26 PM
2

“I have had sex with my wife. She didn’t consent. She found out and saw videos on my phone.” I'll take "Things to not tell the police" for $2,000, Alex.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 07:11 PM
3

There is no victim here.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 03:04 PM
6

Yeah... a random sampling of middle-aged women is probably better than a bunch of 20-something white knights.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 03:03 PM
10

Gender generalizations incoming.... The housework debate seems to always miss one very important factor: Why is the housework being done? Let's face it, generally speaking, the apartment where a single woman lives is going to be cleaner and tidier than the apartment where the single man lives. Plenty of exception in both directions, but if we look at overall trends, that's where they're going to lead us. When two people end up living together, assuming they both have relatively equal non-househo…
/r/MensRights09/08/17 03:01 PM
0

So link us to it.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 01:03 AM
3

Most people see feminism as being about equality Sorry, but that's just flat-out wrong. 85% of Americans believe in gender equality, but 82% do not identify as feminists.
/r/MensRights09/08/17 12:23 AM
0

I was told this story by a man who came to our school and gave us a lecture on healthy relationships. I'm not saying he was lying, but he was lying.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 11:49 PM
3

Consent is agreeing to sex when the option to decline is available. The enthusiasm with which the agreement is delivered is irrelevant, despite what feminists want you to believe.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 08:38 PM
6

The man reluctantly agreed Sorry, but reluctant consent is still consent.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 08:04 PM
2

Of course that isn't rape and I don't believe a man would have been convicted in the US based upon that set of facts.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 08:03 PM
3

No. It is rape if you have sex with a person who has not consented. Consent is agreeing to sex when the opportunity to decline is available. Intoxication does not remove one's ability o decline sex.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 07:54 PM
8

You have the right to say no. She has the right to not be your girlfriend anymore. Same as if the genders are reversed.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 07:33 PM
8

If men can opt out of parenthood, how would women get to experience the equality of child support?
/r/MensRights08/08/17 02:03 AM
6

Because women are trained from puberty that men will say anything to get in your pants and you simply cannot believe anything that you are told by a man because he's just trying to get sex from you! So if a woman is only willing to have sex if there is no (minimal) chance of pregnancy, and a man says "I'm on birth control", she's not going to believe him because that's what he has to say in order to get in her pants.
/r/MensRights08/08/17 12:09 AM
-4

"As a man, I'm supposed to like this." There's a lot of space between liking it and feeling it abused and having it ruin your life - or even your night. Get over it. It isn't a big deal. Hell, some random drunk dude could give me a quick kiss at a club and my reaction would be little more than "well, that was odd". Who cares?
/r/MensRights08/08/17 12:03 AM
4

How can we move beyond just anti-feminism? By defeating feminism so we stop losing ground. We can't even begin to move forward fi we're being pushed back by feminism. You can't attempt to obtain new rights and more equality when the dominant gender-related political influence is to take rights away and create greater inequality. MRA's leaving feminism in place while simultaneously trying to advance men's rights is basically a non-starter. It'd be like the civil rights movement in 1960's Alabama …
/r/MensRights07/08/17 07:09 PM
7

"possibly controversial or sexist" So then... subscribing to TwoX is a bannable TwoX offense?
/r/MensRights07/08/17 07:06 PM
2

Meh... I've cocked off to a few cops in my life when I knew I was right and they were wrong. I'm not sure things would have gone as smoothly if I were a black man instead of a white man. Of course a white woman could probably slap a cop and face no consequences, so I'm thinking I might have experience more white privilege than male privilege.
/r/MensRights07/08/17 01:55 PM
1

Laci Green... for now
/r/MensRights07/08/17 01:53 PM
3

She is the 3%
/r/MensRights06/08/17 05:39 PM
3

Definitive studies are impossible because in virtually all he said / she said rape cases, only the 2 people involved actually know what really happened. And in many cases, even if they flat out agree on the facts, they (and others) will not agree whether it is a rape or a false accusation. In other words, you can't get stats on percentages of false rape accusations before for any individual accusation, you know know whether it goes in the "rape" or "false allegation" category.
/r/MensRights05/08/17 11:20 PM
2

Can we stop complaining about this shit like there is some travesty of justice going on in these cases? THERE IS NO VICTIM HERE.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 02:15 PM
1

In the US, women have full post-conception reproductive rights while men have absolute zero. This despite the fact that women are afforded a plethora of contraception options while men have abstinence, vasectomy and condoms.
/r/MensRights04/08/17 02:08 PM
1

I still don't know what the threat was because there was no threat in the video. You apparently think there was a threat. Your feminist logic is wrong.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 08:47 PM
2

You call me a troll so you don't have to address my points is pretty weak. You sound and act like a feminist.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 08:35 PM
1

So "if you're not going to have sex with me, then we're going to break up" is a threat as well and if you have sex with someone after giving them those choices you're a rapist? Or: If we're not having sex, I'm going to go play video games, or If you don't want to do anal, I don't see this relationship continuing, or If you want another date, you've gotta give me a little on this one, or If you want to get paid for this porn shoot, they you've got to have sex with this guy
/r/MensRights03/08/17 08:26 PM
0

Where was that? I remember point out an option that was presented in the video. I didn't see any threat in the video.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 08:23 PM
5

Did you read the article? Are you sure it is a headline voicing concern, rather than a headline voicing excitement over improving gender equality?
/r/MensRights03/08/17 07:34 PM
1

What was the threat in the video?
/r/MensRights03/08/17 07:32 PM
2

"Have sex with me or I'm getting my friends and we're leaving" is not a threat, it's an option.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 07:32 PM
2

She said, "so they just give up? They don't go out anymore? Don't they want to find somebody? Anybody?!" Basically women are running around asking "where are all the good men?" While men are home watching football having concluded "all the good women are taken". I don't want to overgeneralize, so I'll couch this by saying that there are plenty of exceptions, but generally speaking, Men seek out women because they like having fun with women, while women seek out men because they need men to provi…
/r/MensRights03/08/17 07:30 PM
5

No, they're losers, whining about how they can't get dates. Interesting. Does this mean that 40-something divorcees are the female equivalent of 20-something male incels "living in their mom's basement"?
/r/MensRights03/08/17 06:46 PM
1

Wow. I'm in their age range and those women are not attractive. I would seriously get away from them as quickly as possible if they bought me a drink at a bar. Happy I've got an attractive wife and a stable marriage if the women in that article are a fair representation of what's available on the open market.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 05:18 PM
12

And if you're going to be shit on anyway, why not be shit on by hot 20-somethings rather than used up and worn out 40-somethings.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 05:16 PM
-1

Let the pitchforks come. You're allowed to change your mind. And that mean you can change your mind to "yes", after previously saying "no". In fact, I would argue that previously giving a "no" without negative consequences is a pretty strong indication that the option to decline was available. And if you agree to sex when the option to decline is available, that's consent. And when there is consent, there is no rape.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 05:08 PM
1

A lot of feminists consider regret as a form of rape. Doesn't make it true. Rape is sex without consent. Consent is agreeing to sex when the option to decline is available.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 03:07 PM
1

I subscribe to T_D for the comedy. Half the time, whatever the hell they're posting about in incomprehensible though.
/r/MensRights03/08/17 02:51 PM
2

What are the chances of being falsely accused of rape? What do you mean by this question? Because the chances of being reported to the police and facing arrest are probably pretty low. But if you go to a liberal college, like Berkley, where "ongoing affirmative consent" is that policy of the land and we're talking about being reported to a college disciplinary board? I'm gonna say that your odds go up pretty significantly. It's a pretty low hurdle for an accuser to get over, so if they have any …
/r/MensRights03/08/17 02:49 PM
-1

he consented, why would it be rape?
/r/MensRights03/08/17 02:42 PM
12

everyone thinks that i am gay or impotent or asexual etc So what?
/r/MensRights03/08/17 12:09 AM
5

And that's my point whenever this topic comes up. I'd much rather see male offenders treated more reasonably than female offenders treated more harshly in instances where the sex is clearly consensual, albeit statutorily illegal. That's the gender equality solution that I'd advocate for.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 11:43 PM
-7

There would be no victim there.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 08:50 PM
12

Technically true.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 08:43 PM
-19

So have you changed your position? Because previously you said: 15 year old children cannot give consent.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 05:48 PM
-5

It varies by individuals. Some 12 year olds are likely capable of providing meaningful consent. Some 32 year olds are not.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 05:29 PM
-30

So two 15 year olds is double rape? 15 year olds can give consent. They cannot legally consent to sex with an adult under current laws in the US.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 05:28 PM
-43

There is no victim here.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 05:28 PM
2

Alimony payers: 97% men, 3% women.
/r/MensRights02/08/17 05:26 PM
1

Imagine there are two jobs available and 2 applicants, Jennifer and John, for both the jobs. Job 1 pays $100,000/year, requires an average 55 hour work week (with mandatory weekends), provides 6 holidays per year, and 10 vacation days per year. Health insurance is offered, but it's high deductible with low benefits and it costs $500/month for single coverage. Job 2 pays $80,000/year, requires an average 40 hour work week, observes all federal holidays and offers 20 vacation days per year. Health…
/r/MensRights02/08/17 05:25 PM
3

Feminists got women the right to vote, the right to work, the right to own property, they made "marital rape" a thing, among others. To quote you from an earlier post: "people like him should realize the 1950s aren't coming back". Have some good points indicates present tense, had some good points would indicate past tense. generally stuff about domestic violence, Men are just as likely, if not more likely, to be victims of domestic violence as women. And when men are victims of domestic violenc…
/r/MensRights01/08/17 06:29 PM
7

Have any of you noticed these sentiments as well? In my experience, most (not all, but certainly >75%) women eventually become bitter and jaded about men and adopt the attitude of "they're only interested in me for sex". No matter what a man does - says "hi", holds a door open for her, offers her a job, smiles at her on the subway, asks her out for drinks, invites her to a wedding, etc. etc. etc. - it is all interpreted as "he's only doing this to get sex with me". Unfortunately, most women adop…
/r/MensRights01/08/17 06:21 PM
2

feminists either. Basically, they have some good points Such as?
/r/MensRights01/08/17 06:09 PM
4

Don't confuse drunk, or even blackout drunk, with incapacitation. Incapacitation is what we're looking for here.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 03:36 PM
5

When you consent to sex while drunk and later regret providing that consent, that is regret, not rape.
/r/MensRights01/08/17 01:59 PM
3

myth that sexual assault can sometimes be an “accident,” when in reality, it is always a deliberate act. Without the context, I actually agree with this. Actual sexual assault is never an accident. If one person delivers a clear "no" and the other person still engages in sexual activity, that is a deliberate act, and that is actual sexual assault. The problem comes when you combine this thought process to a perverse and distorted definition of "sexual assault". If your partner changes her mind a…
/r/MensRights31/07/17 06:20 PM
6

This is really feminist ignorance 101: "Men just don't understand what it's like to be a woman. it can be really intimidating and scary sometimes!" "As a woman, I understand what it is like to be a man, and it is awesome all the time!"
/r/MensRights31/07/17 06:13 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter