TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Internal_Storm_9588 Archive

View 3 posts and 58 comments by Internal_Storm_9588 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
–

Aborted fetus has entered the chat.
/r/PurplePillDebate17/08/25 01:40 PM
2

Ahm, most men claim they'd leave a relationship without sex...
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 08:39 PM
5

And it seems like the best strategy if you're open to casual sex and LTRs as a woman. Best option: It works, guy feels super validated by early sex and gladly commits. Second best option: He only wants sex. Still had sex with hot guy.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 07:54 PM
6

Wait, what?! If Chad only fucks the attractive ladies, who does the rest? Certainly not the avarage guys, as I was told 80/20!
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 07:50 PM
2

Mmh, I don't think so much has changed and then again it has. What has always been most important is religion and class. You could still marry off your gawky son and only mildly attractive daughter if they came with the right money and/or title. Class is still important today, inter-class marriages rare (they're actually becoming rarer again with more educated women). However, if you really put work and brain into it, it's likely more doable to climb the social ranks. On the other hand, money's …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 07:44 PM
–

Yup. And OP's puppy love would've also ended rather quickly if he had gotten his teen gf pregnant. And/or it would've ended in a disaster as neither of them had been up to the responsibility.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 03:50 PM
–

Goals are more than just job goals.
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 03:42 PM
–

Take my upvote for this unhinged take! 😂
/r/PurplePillDebate13/08/25 03:36 PM
–

But the bar only works if you're pretty avarage in your preferences, otherwise you never meet "your people". :/ I want a heteroromantic, asexual man, who also needs to share my interests/outlook at life. Good luck finding that ar your avarage bar.
/r/PurplePillDebate09/08/25 02:06 PM
0

For me, it's all about time spent together. When I like someone, and admire them and we spend a lot of time together, I'll likely crush on them sooner or later. 😄 Eyes are usually always beautiful as are smiles and laughing. Little quirks that someone has.
/r/PurplePillDebate08/08/25 05:44 AM
–

I don't know, I'm not there. 😅
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 02:55 PM
10

I expect the same from all people and also try to behave that way: - holding doors for others, offering my seat to old or disabled people - greeting people and thanking them, being polite in interactions - recognising injustices and calling them out, also when they don't directly affect me (e.g. the draft, racist discrimination etc.) - keeping an eye on others and calling for help if need be (e.g. when they're attacked, ill etc.) - Contributing to society, being a law-abiding citizen, paying tax…
/r/PurplePillDebate05/08/25 06:18 AM
0

You can be assertive AND kind, emotionally intelligent, interesting. and sexy. Just look at old movies that depict family men to see what I mean.
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 04:30 PM
2

Graphic not accurate. We all know women go for the top 20% max, possibly even less. /s
/r/PurplePillDebate04/08/25 04:25 PM
4

A+B: No, men actually fare better in monogamy than women (libido declines less, are aware that it's more difficult to find another partner, are more complacent). C: Yes, that's an issue in many relationships.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 12:11 PM
–

Interesting hypothetical, thanks. I had to think a bit to come up with a realistic scenario. I guess it would comparable if my partner didn't want to work full-time, although, theoretically he could. I think I wouldn't want him to be unhappy i.e. pushing him into work he hates. But I also wouldn't be willing to pay for a lot more than 50/50, especially if money is tight. So, I guess, we'd have to down-size. Vacations in our home country instead of far away. But I guess it's really difficult to c…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 12:00 PM
2

I don't get where you take the notion from that I think "men are evil". I don't. I do think that my sex aversion makes me incompatible with most men, but I don't even fault them for that. And a refusal to engage in sex is only really relevant in the context of romantic relationships unlike e.g. a refusal to general emotional connection etc.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 10:54 AM
3

Yeah, but reality is more complex, I think. When your partner says: "God, you make me so horny" and you don't want sex, that "power" feels more like a burden.
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 10:48 AM
0

I fail to see how I'm black pill. If I don't get what I want in a relationship (no focus on sex), I'll just stay single. I'm neither depressed, suicidal nor do I have a desire to burn down society. I even like (many) men, I just don't want to fuck them. The purpose of my OP was to pin down what sex in a relationship means to men as it's often presented as a "physical need". However, as these replies indicate, it seems to be much more an emotional need - like many women's emotional needs for non-…
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 01:08 AM
-1

So you DO confirm that you think ace people don't exist. Cool, do you also think lesbians just haven't found an attractive enough guy yet? If not, what's the difference? I also love how "phallocentric" your world view is: if you can't sexually satisfy a man, you'll fail at life. 👌🏻
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 12:27 AM
0

I find it fascinating that so many red pillers are so adamantly against the idea that people on the asexual spectrum exist. "They have to be sick if they don't want dick/pussy! Everyone wants dick/pussy! And if they don't, it just means that they haven't met someone who's Chad enough!". Yeah, sure...
/r/PurplePillDebate02/08/25 12:06 AM
2

I want to understand how other people think and what motivates them, especially if they hold opinions that are far away from my own. Usually, I discover that I don't consider them as absurd as I've originally assumed. I also like debating and thereby improving my English as a non-native speaker (that's also how I justify for myself why it's a good idea to spend so much time here 😄). Last but not least, subs like these got me so interested in sociological and psychological topics that I've decide…
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 07:51 PM
3

I would have summarised blue pill ideology as "Just be yourself in dating" and "There's someone for everybody". And, yeah, both don't necessarily work.
/r/PurplePillDebate01/08/25 05:40 AM
1

Full on disagree. Classic betabux is a far better deal than many make it out to be. Let me explain: We have a guy who's around or below avarage regarding physical attractiveness, income and general appeal. But he wants a family with kids of his own. And that's exactly what's he gets. Even if his wife divorces him down the line, it's still a good deal. Alimony is rare these days, and shared custody common. And since he's not rich, he doesn't loose a fortune of money due to the divorce as the prov…
/r/PurplePillDebate31/07/25 02:24 PM
1

I agree on the responsive desire part. But do you really believe there's no innate libido level? Of course, it's not just high and low, there's a spectrum, like usually in life. But I think it's also dangerous thinking to assume that you have to just be Chad enough and that's the way to have hot sex forever. When married redpill still existed, there where a few guys who did everything under the sun to get their wife going. But she just wasn't that interested in sex or sex beyond vanilla. So I th…
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 05:44 PM
1

It makes no sense in my eyes, if a high libido man prefers a low libido woman over a high libido woman - because the latter also had sex with other men. That's actively choosing a libido mismatch and sexual frustration on the man's part. That makes no sense to me.
/r/PurplePillDebate25/07/25 01:39 PM
–

Man, if I got a dollar for every "men slaving away", I'd be a billionaire by now. Apparently, the workforce mainly consists of career women and male slaves... 😄 This also isn't true, the biggest thing that kept people out of sex work and children out of prison was a good income regardless of who was bringing in. Exactly. Prostitution was far more common in former times than it is now. (https://www.librarycompany.org/shadoweconomy/section4.htm#:~:text=Exact%20figures%20are%20impossible%20to,2%25%…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 09:20 PM
5

Take away as a woman: Option A) Lie about your sexual past if you sense insecurity from your partner. Admit the most vanilla sex acts only or you'll be pushed to repeat something you didn't like "because you did it with your ex!" Collect bonus points for doing something slightly off the ordinary "Omg, I've never done this before!" Option B) Use "sex confessions" to filter out all those guys with fragile egos. Maybe even make up some escapades to drive home the message.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 08:33 PM
3

You can have a high libido and not sleep around. That such a weird point to bring up imo. Most men on here are horny freaks, they literally just can't get laid lol I don't get what that has to do with women. All I'm hearing is that these men would also sleep around, given the chance. FWB I think is more fine but it depends on some factors like, if the guy doesn't care about her at all and she knew that to me that's a turn off but if it was a close friend that turned into that than sure. I mean, …
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 08:23 PM
3

But how can you be so sure they told you everything? If they sense that you have issues with certain sex acts or types of relationships, it's likely they won't talk about these experiences. It basically incentives them to lie by omission.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 08:14 PM
11

Omg that's so true. Most men only want kids if they come with a caretaker.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 07:35 PM
4

I get the issue with stranger sex as it might indicate risk seeking behaviour that's not welcome (regarding STIs and in general) - but fwb? Where's the problem? Because it wasn't a romantic relationship? I mean, it's just like that: women who are high libido and/or like kinky sex will have sex, lots of it. Because they want it. One should assume that these women would be a good fit for guys who also like and desire sex a lot. But no, while some of these guys are happy to accept these "sluts" (no…
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 07:31 PM
12

I hope the part about the porn movie was a joke. The typical porn movie has nothing to do with reality: no kissing, no sensual touching and sex positions that look good to the camera. And don't even get me started on the stupid, over the top acting.
/r/PurplePillDebate24/07/25 05:39 AM
7

Feeling understood is what makes people feell respected and thus bonded, at least many.
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 08:02 PM
3

The appeal of shallowness is that it's relatively easy. A transactional relationship without really deep intimacy is easier. And for many people it's enough (not judging).
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 04:35 PM
1

Having empathy does not mean you have to act a certain way. It just means you make an honest attempt to understand their feelings and relate to that as another human being. You can have empathy with a murderer and still not condone their actions. Of course, in a romantic relationship situations usually aren't as extreme. Here, empathy could mean that you acknowledge your partner's desire for XY without feeling obligated to accomodate them. But it's still huge that you can say: "Yeah, I understan…
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 04:31 PM
1

Wow, that escalated quickly. 😳
/r/PurplePillDebate21/07/25 04:22 PM
1

Yeah, I think it's often a good fit if the guy is a few (up until 10) years older for the reasons you've mentioned. However, as a woman, I'd still wait until 30 to have kids when you've enjoyed your twenties and are established professionally.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 05:24 PM
5

We should go back to women dropping handkerchiefs or mittens to signal interest - really. 😄
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 04:28 PM
3

There was no sarcasm intended, I agree with you.
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 04:18 PM
0

Yeah, because women actually listen to men. 😅
/r/PurplePillDebate20/07/25 02:56 PM
–

So, good-looking men don't want monogamy? Nah, I don't buy that. There are lots of conservative, family-oriented guys. And they do get married, without constantly cheating on their partner. Because you can't really have a close, intimate relationship with your partner if you're a notorious cheater. Don't forget that marriage is also still a status symbol, also for men.
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 07:16 AM
–

So, what are you now in your relationship? The fucking alpha or the bucking beta? Or maybe neither because the dichotomy is stupid?
/r/PurplePillDebate19/07/25 06:48 AM
7

When is the vetting supposed to take place? I have the impression that many en think women should know if a guy is a "good guy" before actually dating him. However, I would say that vetting is still part of the early relationship. So, are you, OP really advocating that women drop their guy after a few months if he doesn't meet her expectations? I don't think that will sit well with the guys...
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 10:55 PM
4

Man, the same could be said about going to the gym. People can find activities worthwhile and still find them hard to do. Quite often, these two aspects even go hand in hand. By the way, venting to a friend is very different from talking to a therapist.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 05:53 PM
4

Yeah, no. Have you ever been to therapy? I bet not. "Just clean your room" is not good advice in this situation. The client knows this, now she needs tools to achieve that goal and there are tools, like: - Clean for just two minutes (will likely get you into the flow to keep going) - Clean for 30 minutes and then stop, no more cleaning allowed (make the most of it) - Listen to a podcast you like but only while cleaning - Invite somebody over (so you'll feel pressured to do it). And the dismissiv…
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 05:45 PM
1

Agree. By mid twenties, you have a pretty clear picture of what you get personality and value wise.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 05:22 PM
2

Yeah, the complaint makes no sense. Even the red pill states that women start out with the highest SMV, while men work towards it. According to this assumption, couples would ideally meet somewhere in the middle when they get together, let's say mid 20ies (she: 25, him: 27) - which is actually what happens.
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 05:19 PM
10

In my bubble (white, middle-class, central Europe), what I usually see unfold is this: 80% of cases: Guy keeps working the job he'd also do without having a family (about 40-45 hours a week, not "soul-crushing"), woman does 100% of child-rearing (close to a 24/7 when the kids are little) and majority of household "because she's at home anyway". --> Majorly disadvantages the woman unless she keeps being a SAHM when kids are older, which is very uncommon, most women return to work part-time soon, …
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 05:14 PM
–

So, it's a matter of looks/passing? If someone looks (sufficiently) female, you adress them by "her"? And you keep doing that when you get to know they were assigned male at birth?
/r/PurplePillDebate18/07/25 04:59 AM
2

But why would you - counciously - use a wrong pronoun? It's just disrespectful. As it's disrespectful to adress somebody by a wrong name. If someone marries and takes on a new name, we adress them by their new name. Of course, you could e.g. say that you don't respect husbands taking their wives name and thus refuse to adress your male colleague by his new name - but would you really?
/r/PurplePillDebate17/07/25 06:59 AM
2

Of course there is a difference if you lowball your job for a year or two or if you quit for several years. And I've never met a feminist who's against paid parental leave. Nearly all feminists I've heard of strongly encourage men to take on more childcare responsibilities. The problem is that real 50/50 is difficult in the beginning. If you've got two people working and looking after the kids equally, it requires more organisation. Both have to forego promotions and other lucrative opportunitie…
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 04:26 PM
3

As I said - that's not reasonable. But maybe it illustrates why putting one's own career on hold to solely work in the home is such a dangerous play.
/r/PurplePillDebate14/07/25 06:48 AM
1

I agree with you. However, I think another point is that we also overloaded the concept of committed romantic relationships aka marriage. It's no longer primarily an economic partnership to raise children in. People also expect personal happiness, feelings of romantic love, sexual passion and companionship - all in one person until death do you apart. It's no wonder then that so many relationships fail. The expectations are enormous! And I mean that in a neutral way. I absolutely understand why …
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 02:01 PM
4

Sounds pretty weak - as does begging/nagging your way into a marriage. If you don't want to get married, don't do it. However, also don't be miffed if your partner splits up to look for it elsewhere if you don't want. Once children are planned, I get why people want the framework of marriage although the real commitment are the kids. Those you have to support wether married or not. Marriage just makes issues easier as some aspects are more cleary defined and some people still consider the symbol…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 01:34 PM
1

Choose better. If you know she's that ambitionless/her earning potential is this bad why marry her?
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 07:06 AM
2

Apart from the fact that alimony is rare these days: what is this new job supposed to be? Let's say the stay-at-home parent was a lawyer, an IT employee, nurse etc. before becoming a parent. After 15 years being out of the field (because they staid at home), their careers took a massive hit and it's difficult to get back into as their "work experience" of the last 15 years was in a completely unrelated field (I.e. housekeeping and childcare). And it's also not reasonable to suggest the stay at h…
/r/PurplePillDebate13/07/25 07:04 AM
3

I think in this day and age, there really isn't a big difference between men and women regarding whom they consider "casual only". For casual sex, physical attractiveness, flirtyness and feeling sufficiently safe are required. What's not important are shared life goals, hobbies, financial status and whether the partner will go along with friends and family. However, when we're talking about "relationship/marriage material" these factors play a huge role. I think it's crazy to assume (mostly by r…
/r/PurplePillDebate08/07/25 10:49 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter