TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

International_Risk82 Archive

View 3 posts and 304 comments by International_Risk82 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
33

It was a post about a dude not wanting to be an incel anymore. I pointed out that "incel" was a sexist term made up by a bunch of dumb feminists and he shouldn't call himself that. The feminazi responded to my comment calling me an incel (followed by a barrage of personal attacks) to which I responded by saying that she's a classical example of the dumb feminists I mentioned. Then this charade happened.
/r/MensRights15/01/23 02:40 PM
1

P.s. Don't bother linking the studies you did in your previous comments. I've read them and they range from having serious holes to being outright laughable and subjectively interpreted. I think you missed this part. You're obviously more interested in shoving your opinion down other people's throats than to actually have a logical discussion. As such, I won't waste any more time on you. Whatever floats your boat mate.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 11:39 PM
1

That's your opinion dude 🤷‍♂️. Based on my own personal experience and the current socio-political landscape, that isn't even remotely true. P.s. Don't bother linking the studies you did in your previous comments. I've read them and they range from having serious holes to being outright laughable and subjectively interpreted.
/r/MensRights30/12/22 11:35 PM
1

I like your thought process yet I quite disagree. You defined empathy as a scientific (or clinical in a more accurate sense) concept rather than a fundamental building block in the human psyche and human social interactions. Having empathy is more than just understanding how feelings work/what someone feels. Psycopaths, especially high functioning ones understand how "normal" people feel yet they don't actually "understand", hence their unwavering tendency to screw others over at every opportuni…
/r/MensRights30/12/22 09:24 PM
6

Ah yes, a woman who has basically destroyed someone's reputation out of pure spite and malicious intent not to mention being abusive to him beforehand. That's definitely a woman you would want to love, trust, and allow her into the most delicate aspects of your life. Dump her or you'll regret it.. soon.
/r/MensRights17/12/22 06:02 PM
3

162k likes... There's the problem right there.
/r/AntiFeminists14/12/22 10:59 AM
5

Ruin the bitch's life. Hire a good lawyer and sue everyone who was involved in this fuckery and make sure to expose them as much and as loud as you can. Take the case to social media and garner support and, if you can, make sure to expose her at her workplace so she gets fired.
/r/MensRights03/12/22 12:03 PM
1

Feminists: Menstrual blood disgusts you! Me: laughs in medical school
/r/MensRights01/12/22 08:51 PM
3

I'm pro-life mostly but there are three exceptions. If a woman is raped (has to be proven and not some B.S accusation). If the fetus has severe and irreparable congenital defects. If the pregnancy poses a risk to the woman's life. Other than those 3 edge case scenarios, if you have sex knowing that you could get pregnant, you shouldn't get to back out of the consequences by killing the baby.
/r/AntiFeminists28/11/22 12:43 PM
0

I support neither. Actions have consequences, and both parents should take responsibility.
/r/MensRights25/11/22 10:11 PM
3

TLDR. When he does it, it's his fault. When she does it, it's also his fault.
/r/MensRights21/11/22 03:40 AM
2

Funny enough, if the justice system was indeed rigged against women like she said, she wouldn't be able to tout shit like "burn shit down". You can only say things like these when you're confident that you'll get away with it. Dumb bitch.
/r/AntiFeminists17/11/22 03:36 PM
13

It's another victim mentality approach. "Oh look at me, I'm so oppressed because I do the absolute basic as a mother and wife without being paid." Bitch gtfo. You sleep under the roof HE bought, you eat and drink using HIS money, you drive HIS car and you're raising YOUR children. I swear, most marriages these days are men getting married to unofficial whores who want compensation for every fucking thing they do, even when said compensation isn't deserved.
/r/AntiFeminists15/11/22 02:33 PM
23

Sorry to burst your bubble bro, but this is fake. 1.She's wiping in the wrong place. Tears come out of the innermost part of the lower lid. She's wiping in the middle and the outermost part. 2.When you cry, your eyes get very red and blood vessels start to show. Her eyes don't even remotely look like it. Mild irritation at best. 3.When you cry your voice breaks. Her voice isn't breaking, it's just going up and down and you can clearly see the split second where she has to start pretending to cry…
/r/MensRights13/11/22 11:53 AM
42

Yes. Once you become an adult (18-21) you're in charge, and responsible for your actions. Your background isn't an excuse to override your logical thought process. My father is a narcissist who abused me for as long as I can remember, yet I hold myself and others to the same standard.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 01:18 AM
51

Don't (generally) expect reasonable behaviour from people who are childhood trauma survivors. I'm on that sub too and while occasionally I'll find good, constructive content, I'll more often than not find myself rolling my eyes at the empty self-pity and petty childish notions being spread around.
/r/MensRights13/11/22 12:49 AM
1

This will be my final response. If after this you want to keep indulging in this logical fallacy then suit yourself. The fetus starts off as a neutral clay mould with neither feminine nor masculine characteristics. In the presence of the SRY gene the fetus undergoes certain developmental changes specefic to the male anatomy and develops into a male. In the absence of the SRY gene, the fetus will instead undergo different developmental changes which will result in a female. The notion that all ba…
/r/MensRights12/11/22 09:25 PM
3

Ovaries Testicles No, no they weren't. The two are formed from the same germinal cells but differentiation happens later on due to the action of the SRY gene. Just because two things originate from the same source doesn't mean that one of them is a precursor to the other. This is the same pseudoscientific concept which claims that all fetuses were originally female, which no, they weren't.
/r/MensRights12/11/22 07:47 PM
2

No.. they weren't
/r/MensRights12/11/22 07:23 PM
6

I'm not talking about this particular post. While this isn't extremist, the logcial follow up is a systemic hatred and discrimination against women. Women will be avoided like the plague both in social and romantic situations (it's already begun to happen). Dozens of influencers will rise up calling to the "dissing" and shaming of women who do anything men find inconvenient. Men will simply stand and watch while they see women being assaulted/beaten up/wronged etc. because it's not their job to …
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/22 12:23 PM
53

While I don't personally agree with/support andrew tate, it's quite refreshing to see karma in action. The rising extremist notions among men is the natural result of decades upon decades of misandry and the indoctrination of men to hate themselves and view themselves as scum for simply being men. The girl here is right to be scared of the new generation. These men will tear the women and the feminist ideology a new one, and while I don't agree with it, it's fully deserved.
/r/AntiFeminists11/11/22 12:10 AM
2

And then they wonder how and why did the likes of Andrew Tate get so popular. It's honestly becoming more and more difficult to not become bitter as a man in today's world.
/r/MensRights09/11/22 05:33 PM
1

You made two mistakes: 1.Having a twitter account 2.Debating anyone who uses the term "mansplaining" with the intent of reaching a logical agreement.
/r/MensRights06/11/22 10:27 PM
2

I've been actively trying to avoid them tho. Winning in a debate against them isn't worth your mental sanity.
/r/MensRights04/11/22 06:11 PM
15

I've had the unfortunate chance of arguing with about 10 feminists (give or take 2) over the course of being on reddit. None of them were able to use simple applicable logic and only 1 had enough human decency in her to not attack me as a person. The rest either insulted, blocked, or weaponized my posts and insecurities against me. It's honestly hilarious how they fail to grasp how weak and pathetic this makes them look.
/r/MensRights04/11/22 08:42 AM
5

Yeah, I don't hear them crying out for the lives of those male reporters. But of course, "FeMiNiSm mEaNs eQuALitY"
/r/MensRights03/11/22 10:57 PM
13

They need therapy (not all of them), no one here is saying otherwise. What they don't need however is the entirety of society demonizing and shitting on them. You can't expect to help someone by attacking them; that will only make their problems worse.
/r/MensRights01/11/22 10:17 AM
20

What I find confusing about the word "incel" is the association between sexual attractiveness and being an asshole. Ted bundy wasn't unattractive by any measure, nor did he have a problem with dating women, yet he was a foul human to the core that would put almost all of today's "incels" to shame. Moreover, this just goes on to make even less sense when you consider all the kind and good hearted men who have trouble finding a partner. Why can't we call terrible human beings as terrible based on …
/r/MensRights01/11/22 09:45 AM
4

The two movements will never reconcile. Simply because one of them is fighting for the rights that men don't have, and the other claims that men have all the rights, and even when some men don't, it's still the men's fault. See the problem yet?
/r/MensRights30/10/22 02:51 PM
1

It's not a losing battle. You can't expect to undo a century's worth of social damage and stigma in a couple of years. The change is happening, albeit slowly.
/r/MensRights26/10/22 04:38 PM
2

I got called controlling and an incel, here on this sub no less, for saying that men deserve as much of a say regarding abortion as women do, and that the mother doesn't get to terminate a fetus without the father's approval. Apparently fathers having a say regarding the fate of their OWN CHILDREN is now considered barbaric and controlling. smh.
/r/MensRights25/10/22 11:40 AM
14

Why is it surprising? Because most people actually value their lives and mental wellbeing. If I had a child sure there would be drawbacks, but at least I won't fucking die, and I'll have a chance of raising a decent human being to add some good to the world. Not to mention that if you fear being "forced" to have a child, as it violates your free will, then isn't being "forced" to die in a war the same thing, but much worse? Your whole argument is a giant, and somewhat ignorant, loophole.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 02:53 AM
9

Let me get this straight. You would rather have a near guaranteed chance to die, suffer a permanent disability or worse; suffering severe PTSD for life than go through 9 months of pregnancy while being surrounded by your loved ones? Not to mention that your chance of dying from childbirth is about 0.002% ? You've got to be joking at this point.
/r/MensRights24/10/22 02:42 AM
9

Thank you for this. Also, If all men disappeared, the human race would be extinct within a decade More like 2 or 3 years, tops.
/r/MensRights19/10/22 02:59 PM
4

The supply chain (ships, planes, trucks etc) would cease functioning within the first two days. Basic infrastructure such as roads, bridges, railways would lose their highly educated and specialised maintenance teams and cease functioning in two weeks give or take. Basic services such as gas, electricity, water, sewage treatment, food production and much more would cease to exist within days. The vast majority of law enforcement would disappear and crime would become rampant as people struggle t…
/r/MensRights19/10/22 02:57 PM
4

I keep saying it, if society conditioned men to treat women the same way women treat men ie. same prejudices and paranoid, selfish behaviour then women wouldn't have an iota of social advantage to abuse.
/r/MensRights13/10/22 06:36 PM
8

Marriage isn't just any normal partnership. It's supposed to be based on love and sacrifice, not on "contributions". The former is increasingly rare to find among the female populous, while the latter is nearly impossible to. Add to it the actual "material" contributions, in which men play a much more critical role than women do, per single marriage. Hence, my point.
/r/MensRights08/10/22 03:49 PM
13

Otherwise we're admitting women do nothing important in a marriage. Actually that is correct in the vast majority of marriages. When you look at it from the perspective of women (in general/most of them) loving men only for what they can provide, you end up with a marriage partner (the woman) that does nothing that the man can't replace except for sex (and even that is replaceable in western countries). House chores? Get a maid Cooking? See first answer, also cooking is easy to learn Kids? Adopt…
/r/MensRights08/10/22 09:22 AM
3

where did feminism go wrong? It was always wrong. Feminism as a principle was founded by a woman named Mary Wollstonecraft. She believed in equal rights for women such as jobs and education but she didn't believe that men and women were truly equal ie. in their responsibilities. This basically means that she wanted equality only when it benefited women. Following in her ideas the feminist movement has been a dumpsterfire of misandry, hypocrisy, victim mentality and hatred ever since its creation…
/r/MensRights05/10/22 09:01 PM
13

It wasn't "hijacked", it was a radical shitshow from the very beginning. Just look up its history and the actions of its leading figures.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 05:16 PM
27

Was never a feminist. The idea of equal rights was fine but having a political movement about gender equality named "feminism" never sat right with me and it felt like a farce intended to impose an equally stupid narrative. Sure enough, over the years my suspicions were proven right by all the misandrist crap I saw coming out of these vile excuses of human beings.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 04:58 PM
2

Bruh, advocating for violence is not the same as advising someone to physically defend themselves if the worst comes to pass. When did the mods on this sub become such pussies? I swear, the quality of both mods and people on this sub has deteriorated so much over the years, it's tragic.
/r/MensRights04/10/22 02:00 AM
31

pathetic incels in groups like this. Says the person following, and commenting in said groups.
/r/MensRights21/09/22 03:07 AM
7

Overall I think it's a bad idea. Not only do we already have a platform (this sub) where our opinions can be shared (and could function as a questionnaire sub too), but the sub has had a recent influx of simps, feminists, and trolls. Creating an AskMRA sub would only double that issue. It's not worth it imo.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 04:59 PM
0

🤝
/r/MensRights20/09/22 02:16 PM
3

Yeah, no. While it's true that the educational field is dominated by women (at least in the primary stages) those jobs can be easily filled in and they don't require much skill at all. You can't be seriously implying that replacing female teachers with male ones is as/more difficult than replacing male construction workers/engineers/truck drivers/scientists/plumbers/electricians etc. with female ones As for the medical field, women only dominate as nurses. When it comes to doctors the percentage…
/r/MensRights20/09/22 11:58 AM
-2

Sigh.. sentimental idiot. I was simply arguing using simple applicable logic. The world as we know it ie. Infrastructure and what not is almost exclusively run by men. If women ceased to exist that infrastructure would still find men to run it, unlike the other way around. In no way, shape or form did I ever mention that the world would be better if women disappeared nor did I ever mention that it would solve the world's problems. In no way, shape or form did I ever say that women are only good …
/r/MensRights20/09/22 10:47 AM
2

If we manage to invent artificial wombs (which we are very close to) and a method of cloning stored ovums, then the world, post women disappearing, would be hardly any different. Except of course, you know, emotional attachments.
/r/MensRights20/09/22 10:13 AM
6

Your thought process is weird. If you want the ownership to be yours why give it to her in the first place? Why not just buy gold (without telling her) and keep it somewhere safe as an investment? If you give something to your girlfriend (or anyone for that matter) as a gift, you don't get to take it back. Either buy your girl some jewelry for HER, or don't give her anything at all.
/r/MensRights18/09/22 11:44 PM
39

Was saving my free award for something truly exceptional. Here you go good sir, you deserve it and then some.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 12:06 PM
44

Fucking women.. So men are falsely accused and lose their careers, families and lives in the process but it only becomes relevant when it affects women? Hillary clinton would be proud, you sick fucks.
/r/PussyPassDenied15/09/22 06:45 PM
1

It's a two way street. If the man is an asshole for exploiting a woman "in need", then she's a cheap, lazy slut who sold her body/morals to make a living in effect taking the easy way out. But of course feminists will try to pin all the blame on the man. cue sad music
/r/MensRights06/09/22 05:37 PM
3

That's rich coming from women who not only initiate about 70-80% of all divorces, but are also generally infamous for their double standards, hypergamous ideals, and tendency to fuck over their former SO in court and take as much of their possessions as humanly and legaly possible.
/r/MensRights05/09/22 10:10 AM
-1

Second example of classical female shaming tacitcs: insult the man's masculinity in the hopes of him giving up his ideals to suit your personal narrative. Your pettiness is only matched by your sheer stupidity and inability to formulate meaningful and impactful sentences. But by all means, keep going. Show everyone how truly pathetic you, and everyone who shares your beliefs are.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 05:08 PM
-2

Classical female shaming tactic; assuming that I'm single and using said assumption to debunk what I said which reflects your own failing desire of being seen as sexually desirable, and viewing such aspects as the ultimate measurement of human value. You don't have a right to someone else's uterus Unless said someone actively has sex witht their spouse while knowing that there's a possibility of getting pregnant. Fathers aren't second rate parents and they must be involved within every decision …
/r/MensRights01/09/22 05:04 PM
-5

Men should have a say on whether or not women can have an abortion. You needed that man to create that baby, so you don't get to decide its fate on your own. Imagine being a father and watching your unborn child being passively murdered by your wife while not being able to do shit about it because it's "her body, her choice".
/r/MensRights01/09/22 04:11 PM
1

Fun fact: If you expand the definition of rape to include forced penetration (a woman forcing a man to penetrate her), then men actually get raped more than women.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 11:54 AM
3

You do realise that recognizing basic facial expressions that convey certain emotions doesn't actually equate to being able to empathize with/fully grasp said emotions, don't you? Even high functioning sociopaths and psychopaths have excellent emotional facial recognition. This alone debunks your whole comment. You wrote so much but ended up saying nothing useful. Fantastic.
/r/MensRights01/09/22 04:28 AM
5

The study doesn't take several factors into account. First and foremost, it doesn't differentiate between empathy and sympathy, which is a huge point as regards to importance about this topic. Furthermore it doesn't take into account the tendency of women to be able to "fake" or "mask" their emotions (which is why it takes so long to diagnose autism in girls) and that women place a much greater value on their social image which would give them an incentive to "fake" empathy if they require to in…
/r/MensRights31/08/22 11:37 PM
14

automatic empathy You mean their maternal/nurturing instict? Because if so, that isn't empathy. That is sympathy/pity/treating someone like a child. If this is true then it would mean that women on average aren't empathetic at all to the feelings of others. Which would honestly be reflective of the real world if you think about it.
/r/MensRights31/08/22 08:56 PM
34

I said this before and I'll say it again. When you (Ukrainian men) get through this, and you will, you should throw mass protests to strip the women of any "rights" they have that they're not paying a price for.
/r/MensRights30/08/22 08:09 AM
2

Your wife seems to come from an abusive household where the main abusive parent used to drink, hence why this is so triggering to her. However, the moment she threatened you with your child, she revoked any and all rights of being treated as a respectable human being, let alone a wife. I agree with other people here that a divorce is quite possibly heading your way. Start taking the necessary legal steps to ensure custody of your daughter. Keep a recorder on at all times to document whatever ins…
/r/MensRights29/08/22 11:04 PM
4

Asking to meet someone you don't know near your house is creepy regardless of the gender of the person asking. A better alternative is to meet somewhere in the middle which would also make it easier for both people.
/r/MensRights28/08/22 12:03 AM
3

She's the adult in possession of child porn, she's the one in trouble not you. Just bear the consequences and tell your parents, better to get yelled at for a couple of days at most than to suffer blackmail for years.
/r/MensRights21/08/22 10:26 AM
8

NTA. After what she pulled off she doesn't deserve happiness and most certainly doesn't deserve a raise. More importantly, she doesn't get to be a part of something delicate and constructive with her tendency to backstab those closest to her. If he can somehow get her fired even, that would be the icing on the cake.
/r/PussyPassDenied19/08/22 11:43 PM
3

a lot of what he says really rubs me the wrong way. You're not alone. Almost all of this sub feels the same way. I have (regrettably) listened to him quite a bit to establish somewhat of a fair view and the amount of verbal diarrhoea he spews is unreal. As of today I've only heard him make one, just one, good point. And even that was done indirectly.
/r/MensRights19/08/22 08:10 PM
9

It's apparently a worldwide phenomenon. Women are generally defended no matter what, and men are generally attacked no matter what.
/r/MensRights13/08/22 06:23 AM
22

I've only read one comment about hating women on this sub in the last two weeks or more. That comment not only was responded to later, by a man nonetheless, but it was deleted in the end. Your claim is nonsensical.
/r/MensRights12/08/22 09:25 PM
9

It's not his opinions. I saw a video of him abusing a woman in a sexual context. Whether that was consensual or not is up for debate, but the fact the video was leaked, and given his overall personality, it makes you raise an eyebrow.
/r/MensRights10/08/22 01:14 PM
7

A petty self deluded asshole who probably should be locked up.
/r/MensRights10/08/22 01:11 PM
3

Don't help them either. In truth, the idea of someone asking for help only to take advantage of that other person is much more common when women ask men for help and not the opposite (take the scene from TBBT where the guys helped that blonde chick set up her home). Besides, they're strong and independent women right? Time to live up to that mantle ladies.
/r/MensRights09/08/22 09:01 AM
4

Skimmed the text she wrote as there was just too much to patiently read. Her points are either deflections, victim mentality, denial, strawman arguments, or logical fallacies. Don't bother about trying to refute them OP, it's a debate you'll never win because you're arguing with stupid, sentimental, and agenda driven people.
/r/MensRights08/08/22 11:52 AM
5

Men as a group are mocked for showing emotions and being vulnerable. Men as a group are expected to be walking ATMs for women. Failing to do so gets you labelled as cheap and you're put entirely in fault. Men as a group are treated as expendable cannon fodder and experience conscription while women don't, take the current Ukraine situation as an example. Men as a group are never perceived as rape or sexual harassment victims when the perpetrator is a woman. Men as a group are almost never taken …
/r/MensRights04/08/22 11:44 PM
1

Confront her harshly and demand she listen to you as you do her. If she doesn't then it's time to find another partner who acts like an empathetic adult. You tossing your feelings to the side will only lead you down a path of self hatred and resentment. You'll explode sooner or later and in doing so, you might do things you'll regret.
/r/MensRights02/08/22 11:13 PM
8

What sub is this on?
/r/MensRights01/08/22 06:40 PM
200

No, we aren't. Assuming we are at war with them means that we recognise them as having value, which they don't. I've seen first hand the kind of batshit crazy they have over there and I'm telling you this from experience, they're not worth your time and effort.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 09:40 PM
1

This is a painfully obvious satire. But if it isn't, well shit.
/r/MensRights31/07/22 11:05 AM
12

Because women are never viewed as having the potential to be evil. Sure people will tell you that bad people exist in both genders but subconsciously, they'll never associate that "bad" with women unless irrefutable evidence is presented. This leads us to the notion that women are innocent victims who have all the right to shit on the "evil" men. You as a man are conditioned from the day you start to socialise with other people to tolerate and ignore any nasty emotional abuse a woman dishes out …
/r/MensRights29/07/22 01:10 PM
4

Depends on your definition of sexuality. Sexual kinks that fit within the monogamous nature of a relationship are fine. However, that's not what is being implied here. The context here is in the lines of polyamory/polygamy, swinging etc. These sexual behaviours are not within the definition of a monogamous relationship and thus are unacceptable within the structure of one. If one partner decides they want to try it out they must inform the other and give them the decision of whether or not to st…
/r/MensRights21/07/22 05:10 PM
76

She said it was her right to explore her sexuality When single, not when she's in a strictly monogamous and committed relationship. Find another therapist who isn't cracked in the head.
/r/MensRights21/07/22 12:54 PM
2

It used to mean a male who's unattractive to females and who responded to such by taking out his anger and hatred on them. Now it means : "you disagree with my childish idea but I don't have a rebuttal so I can only insult you"
/r/MensRights17/07/22 08:44 AM
3

ultimately inconsequential lives largest contribution toward the future of humanity." The level of cognitive dissonance and brain farting necessary to have both of those sentences said back to back is unimaginable to me. Their hypocrisy isn't even funny anymore, it's just sad.
/r/MensRights15/07/22 02:49 AM
1

are you seriously taking an over 200 year old text to base ur judgement on feminism today? Yes because the same narrative is being pushed forwards till this day. Feminists are always screeching about their desire to abolish gender roles but once shit hits the fan they'll be the first to run away and let men take all the shit. Case in point, the current Ukraine situation. Not once have I heard any objections from feminists regarding the fact that men aren't allowed to leave the country. Not once …
/r/MensRights14/07/22 01:57 PM
1

Mary wollstonecraft, regarded by many to be the founder of feminism through her book "A vindication of the rights of woman" claimed she wanted women to be equal to men while simultaneously saying that men and women aren't equal. Which is just a fancy way of saying she wants equal rights but not equal responsibilities. None of the scholars/writers who wrote about feminism from the 18th and 19th century mentioned that women should, in order to achieve equality, take on societal male roles such as …
/r/MensRights14/07/22 11:52 AM
49

Is your ego threatened by feminism It's not about ego, it's about my basic dignity as a human being. Feminists can deny it all they want but feminism in itself as a movement bases its ideological beliefs in the notion that men were fundamentally oppressing women throughout history, and that men historically were a "privileged" class. This makes it clear to see that the driving narrative of feminism is not justice or equality, rather it's victim mentality and the desire for revenge and superiorit…
/r/MensRights14/07/22 08:07 AM
3

Beat me to it.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 06:59 PM
1

Yeah sure buddy, whatever floats your boat.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 04:43 PM
1

Never said anything about deserve. I simply said that it's a waste of time and resources especially when nearly all of their gender related illnesses can be treated by other existing specialities.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 03:55 PM
1

"Loose vagina energy" aka a slut. But we all know what the reaction to that would be.
/r/MensRights13/07/22 12:49 AM
4

openly but proudly admits that she is a misandrist I basically stopped caring after I read this. I'll grant your girlfriend the benefit of the doubt and advise you to persuade her to undergo therapy. If she refuses then dump her. This isn't the right woman for you, nor is she fit to become a mother and raise children
/r/MensRights12/07/22 08:42 PM
1

🤝
/r/MensRights12/07/22 12:38 AM
5

I actually did. Twice. I mentioned it albeit indirectly within my replies to you (especially the second one) and you can reread what I said. Think of it as killing two birds with one stone. I don't have the patience to address the same point to multiple people.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 07:52 PM
8

No, the context of your original reply is in the notion of pinning the blame of interruption on men and painting them as the original "aggressors". Otherwise you would've simply stated that the other person was being sexist and ignorant to assign speech interruption to women as a whole. it’s kind of creepy I like to learn more about people I'm debating. Helps me to draw logical patterns of human behaviour. Sometimes it informs whether I should debate them at all or not.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 07:23 PM
10

I love how you people claim to fight sexism yet you keep coming up with sexist bullshit like this. You're trying to frame the behaviour of speech interruption as a uniquely male behaviour even though it's committed by people of both genders which is ironically, and hilariously, a sexist notion. Same shit goes to sexist terms like toxic masculinity and "mansplain". Even your post history shows how much of a triggered, narrow minded, little snowflake you are; you took a comment which was a painful…
/r/MensRights11/07/22 06:00 PM
9

The fairer sex, everyone.
/r/MensRights11/07/22 02:12 PM
5

Feminism by definition, is a sexist movement which is fueled by an everlasting victim mentality. If you don't share such values then you don't belong with feminism, rather with egalitarianism.
/r/MensRights10/07/22 08:34 PM
3

You completely forgot proctologist. No I didn't. I said the vast majority, not all. You can lump oncologists and general surgeons with proctologists in the list of medical professions that men need the least. The whole point of my post is that by creating a profession that does all 4, you make people's lives much easier, and make treating certain diseases more efficient. No you wouldn't, that's not how the real world works. It wouldn't make it more efficient to jam 4 or 5 specialities into 1 job…
/r/MensRights08/07/22 07:30 PM
9

Medical student here. Not sure if any social construct exists that is the direct cause of this, but from my own experiences, an "andrologist" is a relatively needless profession. The vast, vast majority of male specefic health concerns can be addressed by one of three specialities: endocrinologist, urologist, or a fertility specialist. On the other hand, pregnancy and childbirth (the only main reason for the existence of gynaecologists) are highly complicated and specific medical phenomena that …
/r/MensRights08/07/22 06:55 PM
2

"you people" refers to people who try so hard to find some sort of excuse or loophole (in your case stating that they're doing a parody) to excuse, lessen the impact, or soften the label of any immoral action a woman does. A woman abuses a man? He must've done something to piss her off. A woman is unhappy? Must be his fault somehow for not being attentive enough. A woman kills several children on accident while trying to posion her husband (true story)? Oh well it's a shame but she must've had a…
/r/MensRights08/07/22 03:29 PM
7

So when men do it, they're clearly incels. But when women do it they must be mimicking the evil incels, and thus are performing a parody? Why do you people have your heads so far up your own asses that it's your first instinct to villify men who act like shit, but create loopholes out of thin air for women when they do the same?
/r/MensRights08/07/22 02:42 PM
18

Yes, apologize for a system that you didn't make, that harms you as well due to the simple fact that it's a man-made construct ie. not perfect, and apologize to some random pieces of shit that couldn't care less about you just because they have a vagina. Lunacy and lack of self respect at its finest.
/r/MensRights07/07/22 08:54 AM
2

I read the article and you're absolutely right. I apologise for my shortsighted comments.
/r/MensRights03/07/22 06:14 AM
6

Ah I see. Such assumptions don't apply to crimes like rape, especially when it's a man on woman rape. If a woman has a man pinning her down (this edge scenario is a must) with his penis exposed, which means he's about to penetrate her, there's nothing that guarantees to her that she could get away without any drastic measures nor does anything guarantee that he won't kill her afterwards. ie. It's not like a slap in the face would make him back off and snapping off a woman's neck or choking her t…
/r/MensRights02/07/22 07:35 PM
16

As I said, depends on the context. extreme and vengeful. In case of her biting him during the attack to defend herself, no. In case of her biting him after he was no longer a threat, yes, and should probably be deserving of some measure of legal punishment.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 07:12 PM
20

Like I said, self defence. If he was trying to force himself onto her (given that the rape attempt actually happened) she could've taken the chance when her head was near his dick. You can't blame her for doing everything in her power to defend herself. If she bit him after he was no longer a threat however, that's another story.
/r/MensRights02/07/22 07:06 PM
82

If there's clear evidence of the rape attempt then the rapist got what he deserved. Completely justifiable self defence 👍
/r/MensRights02/07/22 06:59 PM
1

If they were like walking up to my car and blocking the door at the gas station it would be freaky. Fair enough. But the idea being pushed here is that even vocal "flattering" is seen as a criminal offence and an attempt to dehumanize the woman unless the man who does it is one that she's attracted to.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 07:28 PM
1

You're missing the point. The point here is that it's fine by her to be sexualized (as sexual attraction is all that she's presenting right now) as long as the man doing it is one that she's attracted to, but it suddenly becomes a criminal offence when the man/men that do it are people she's not attracted to.
/r/MensRights30/06/22 07:14 PM
16

Sometimes they did, yes.
/r/MensRights29/06/22 06:41 PM
19

Or bloody mary
/r/MensRights29/06/22 02:28 PM
3

The fact that so many people fail to grasp such a simple concept is mind boggling to me. Stupidity and strawman arguments galore. Putting it simply, if women can have unrestricted and autonomous access to negating their parental responsibility then men must have the same. If men can't have unrestricted and autonomous access to negating their parental responsibility, then neither should women. That's how it should be and no amount of mental gymnastics bullshit will change that. It's so simple yet…
/r/MensRights28/06/22 03:41 PM
3

Biology has no role to play here really. The whole idea being argued is that women should have the final say in abortion because they're using their resources (their bodies) to nurture the fetus. In the same sense men should have the final say on whether or not to be fathers because they're using their resources (their money) to nurture the fetus (the baby later on) and the mother. If men can't have a say in abandoning the baby despite having to spend their money, women shouldn't have a say in k…
/r/MensRights27/06/22 01:51 AM
1

Focus on your emotional intelligence/maturity and your communication skills. The amount of men who report being hurt/taken advantage of/dumped/ridiculed etc by their woman for being vulnerable or breaking down is nothing short of terrifying. Men's mental health is a dark joke at this point in time. A man isn't weak or any less of a man if he cries, collapses under pressure, or suffers from crippling emotional problems. If you don't share this POV then please, leave your fiancé and spare him the …
/r/MensRights26/06/22 11:16 AM
9

Story time, I'm from Egypt. A couple of days ago a college girl was stabbed to death by her colleague for rejecting him. The whole thing grew so popular and sparked so much outrage that it was recognised internationally and posted on multiple subreddits. The social media response was as expected with women openly attacking men and labeling them as pigs and generally lumping them together for the actions of one man. The murderer was trialled and found guilty but a verdict is yet to be issued. The…
/r/MensRights26/06/22 11:01 AM
1

🤝
/r/MensRights19/06/22 11:34 AM
1

Do you really think I'm bitter Yes. You're either fooling yourself that you're not, or it has consumed you so badly and for so long that you feel nothing but cold, seering hatred towards them. History has proven time and time again, anything that bases itself in hatred and destruction is short lived, no matter what great things are achieved in the process.
/r/MensRights19/06/22 09:37 AM
4

Had an extremely blue pilled view of women untill I got my heart stomped on by an ex. Naturally my extreme blue pilled view transitioned to an extreme red pill view. From an emotional perspective, I hate women and view them akin to cruel, thoughtless animals. Logically however, I recognize that this is wrong and I'm on my way to healing (hopefully). Found this sub during my days in the MGTOW one and have come to be quite fond of the environment around here. It's much more healthy and "constructi…
/r/MensRights17/06/22 10:09 PM
1

Dude.. too many words. Regardless, you misunderstand my intentions. I'm not saying to take the moral high ground, we should absolutely crush these misandrist dicks to the ground whenever given the chance/if we make the chance ourselves. That being said, you can't victimise yourself and get caught in an endless cycle of self pity. Doing so will result in 4 things: It'll erode you from the inside out. Feeling resentment and hatred is like drinking poison and hoping for the other person to die. You…
/r/MensRights17/06/22 07:54 PM
-2

Being a victim of an awful situation and living your life as a victim within your head are two completely different things. If you want to live a life as petty and as miserable as the feminists we see, then by all means, "victimise" yourself away.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 08:02 AM
1

No. Once you adopt their sick, radical, and victim mentality fueled garbage it means you've stooped down to their level. We may face oppression and discrimination in certain areas, but we are NOT victims and we don't treat ourselves and others as such. That is what separates us from them.
/r/MensRights17/06/22 02:21 AM
9

Don't budge. You might get called a misogynist but at least no woman will be able to falsely accuse you of something that could end your career life. Untill the majority of women grow into decent human beings, you have every right to be paranoid.
/r/MensRights16/06/22 09:10 AM
6

You should try voice recording her threats/theatrics. With lunatics like her, any shred of evidence can play a huge part in guaranteeing your saftey.
/r/MensRights15/06/22 03:09 PM
40

"So you're saying that women are such mindless sheep to be basically dragged along for millennia, with no contributions to the societal structure whatsoever? Sounds pretty sexist." Should shut whoever's asking you for good.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 11:09 AM
6

Amber heard, brie larson, lily singh etc. They're all above average when it comes to looks and quite "successful" too, doesn't negate the fact that they're retarded feminists tho.
/r/MensRights12/06/22 11:03 AM
11

Mansplaining, manspreading, toxic masculinity, fragile masculinity and now, manpathy? How deep into their own asses do these morons have their heads to not notice that this is sexist??
/r/MensRights11/06/22 07:30 PM
3

It's a term that's used by brainwashed simpletons who blindly follow the "herd" so to speak. Best case scenario it's sentimental rambling, worst case scenario it's cheap manipulation.
/r/MensRights11/06/22 12:28 PM
5

It's both predictable and logical for the majority of violent criminals to be men, because men have the biological facilities to help commit such crimes. This doesn't detract from the importance/gravity of the reported statistics. Should we not care about domestic abuse victims in lesbian relationships (which are 44%) because it's women who are abusing women? This is victim blaming and gaslighting at its finest. This goes without saying that women are just as abusive but in different ways; mostl…
/r/MensRights10/06/22 08:12 PM
1

Schrödinger's Partriarchy: The patriarchy is a system that simultaneously harms and privileges men untill something happens. The feminists then choose which option better suits their narrative.
/r/MensRights10/06/22 03:34 PM
37

Yeah he's right. I used to give up my seat for women like an idiot untill I wised up and stopped treating them like snowflakes. I only give up my seat now if the woman is pregnant, if it's an elderly person or a person with a debilitating physical condition. If none of the above apply to a woman, then she can keep standing.
/r/PussyPassDenied08/06/22 08:25 PM
37

Not all feminists are radical misandrists, but feminism in itself is a radical, misandrist movement. Any woman who's worth a damn as a person and who actually desires equality would not associate with feminism if she truly knew and understood the origins and the agenda of the movement.
/r/MensRights08/06/22 07:19 PM
7

I don’t see how you can claim that women don’t care about men’s feelings if men often hide their feelings from women in the first place. https://www.reddit.com/r/AskMen/comments/spmuye/men_that_opened_up_to_the_girlfriendwife_when/?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share I encourage you to read as many comments in that post as you can. Men hiding their feelings is more often than not, a direct consequence of being hurt by women. Toxic masculinity is a societal construct No it isn't. Toxic mascul…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 07:01 PM
20

I second this. The bashing these feminists get in the comments and the information presented in the process actually helps the MRA movement.
/r/MensRights07/06/22 02:59 PM
18

I really didn't want to reply as this would be a waste of my time, but a special type of idiot such as yourself deserves a certain amount of attention, not to mention I don't like the spreading of falsehoods and straw-man arguments. Most doctors around the world are male Incorrect. Men are the majority of doctors in only few countries. Most countries have nearly identical percentages and a few even have significantly more female doctors. As a doctor myself, I can add that certain specialties are…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 01:23 PM
43

toxic masculinity No. It's because other people, namely women, don't care about our feelings and they shame us for it. In addition, toxic masculinity doesn't exist. Slapping masculinity in front of something you don't like is doing what I'm pretty sure you tout as being against; which is being sexist. And before you say that men hiding their emotions is a consequence of the patriarchy, you should check the "male tears" feminist propaganda. You're either an ignorant woman (predictable), or a simp…
/r/MensRights07/06/22 09:33 AM
10

Oh yes they will
/r/MensRights07/06/22 09:14 AM
10

"Speak freely and openly" as she freely posts this on social media with no issues whatsoever. You have to be a special kind of stupid to believe her at this point.
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/22 11:45 PM
1

Fucking aye
/r/PussyPassDenied01/06/22 11:00 PM
20

I was fine with what you said untill I read this However, I'm single right now and I'm not going to pass up on commitment free sex This makes you as much of a cheating, lying bastard as she is and karma will catch up with you one day. You two should go back to being partners, you're the same type of ugly.
/r/MensRights31/05/22 08:09 AM
12

You dear sir, just hit the nail on the head. I salute you 🤝
/r/MensRights29/05/22 05:24 PM
35

a feminist movement ....... >Egalitarianism No. The two are not synonymous and are not connected in any shape or form. Please don't tarnish the name of egalitarianism by associating it with the dumpsterfire pile of shit that is feminism.
/r/MensRights29/05/22 10:20 AM
30

Everything is the fault of men. Men abusing women? Men are abusive Men abusing other men? Same reason as above Men suffering due to societal pressures? It's the fault of toxic masculinity and the patriarchy Women suffering due to societal pressures? Same as above Women abusing men? They deserved it Women abusing other women? They are displaying internalized misogyny and the patriarchy is at fault No matter the situation these intellectually impaired whores will flip it around so that it's the ma…
/r/MensRights29/05/22 09:55 AM
4

No, young lady, it doesn't. Toxic behaviour is toxic behaviour. It's constant in the fact that it's the product of an abusive childhood. Not a single toxic behaviour known in psychiatric records can be specifically attributed to men or women (you can find people from both genders guilty of it). Slapping a gender title in front of a toxic behaviour is like associating certain criminal acts with certain races. It's shortsighted and ignorant at best, and blatantly sexist/racist at worst.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 08:54 PM
5

That has nothing to do with masculinity and everything to do with a perverted notion of power. This behaviour can be seen widely among women too. Emotionally scarred people, irrespective of their gender, view negative/vulnerable emotions as weakness.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 07:41 PM
2

People here calling you out for having toxic masculinity, but I disagree. Not just the fact that there's no such thing as toxic masculinity, but also that you in my book don't even qualify as a person. You're shitting on a page that aims to help men in turn insulting them, you insult women, and then you try to preach your demented self righteous beliefs. You're nothing but a psychopathic parasite.
/r/MensRights23/05/22 07:36 PM
15

Because bringing something worthwhile to the table doesn't register with most women. Most of them see themselves as the whole table. So much for not objectifying themselves lol.
/r/MensRights22/05/22 09:14 PM
3

All I'm saying is that both you and your shaming tactics are pathetic. Thank you for proving my point yet again. shrugs
/r/MensRights20/05/22 02:14 AM
9

men like JP are going to have a say This has always puzzled me. What's the problem with men having a say in the attractiveness or the lack thereof in a woman? Why is it so threatening to you (as women in general and feminists in particular) when a man voices his opinion about female attractiveness? It's not like these men are beating you over the head to force you to uphold their standards. Talk about a fragile ego.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 02:12 AM
6

I just love how you claim some moral high ground yet not only did you use the same method he did, you also doubled down with false and baseless claims. Moron.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 02:02 AM
0

As usual, the man says something that's either logically accurate, or pretains to the majority of the intended population without offending anyone, only for the radical left to begin screeching and demanding he be cancelled. Edit: Apparently she responded to his PERSONAL opinion by saying: "hoes be mad 💅". Just the response I'd expect from someone like her.
/r/MensRights20/05/22 01:50 AM
3

Both the sub and the movement are a bunch of bitter, historically ignorant morons.
/r/MensRights18/05/22 10:09 AM
6

Different people define it in different ways. 1.For some, it's the "toxic" behaviours that men do towards each other or primarily, women. Some say that it's the compulsive need to distance oneself from anything feminine in fear of being ridiculed or perceived as less than. The more radical individuals take it a step further and say that men are inherently evil trash and that masculinity in itself is toxic. The future being female and all that feminist crap. It goes without saying that none of th…
/r/MensRights17/05/22 01:38 PM
2

It's a myriad of reasons that cause it which isn't helped by the fact that testosterone is a picky little fucker and its level is affected by a wide variety of stimuli. The main issues are chemical compounds in plastics, fast food, and sedentary lifestyles/jobs.
/r/MensRights15/05/22 10:36 PM
7

Why are you assuming that I'm upset? I'm not. I didn't even downvote you. You're, however, missing the point; that relationships with women in today's age are more often than not, losing gambles.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 07:46 PM
12

Men aren't animals. Believe it or not, we can actually control our impulses and desires, especially when it comes to dating in the current clusterfuck that is the feminism infested world.
/r/MensRights14/05/22 07:23 PM
11

Don't forget incels
/r/MensRights12/05/22 08:30 AM
6

They're being FORCED to die in a war; they can't leave the country if they wanted to. Last time I checked, every person (under the logic of human rights) should be able to choose whether or not they're willing to undergo a risk that could leave them dead, or scarred for life; a right which has been taken away from these men. The women on the other hand were given a free passage out of the country should they wish to. To add insult to injury, none of the pathetic feminists who keep crying about "…
/r/MensRights06/05/22 04:01 PM
15

When a woman keeps abusing her man physically, emotionally, and verbally while he's forced to "accept" it since he can't defend himself without being accused of assault, nor can he vent about it without being laughed at, then punching a wall is the only way left to vent that frustration without it being used against him. Then again, we'll occasionally see some fucking simps like yourself who turn a blind eye to the main issue in an attempt to put the man at fault. Fuck you.
/r/MensRights29/04/22 10:19 PM
1

You just refuted your own argument. products to help children? You said it. To HELP children. What help does a testicle compressing underwear provide for a 4 year old? Any parent who buys such a thing will be forcing their child to wear it to satisfy their own agenda.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 11:58 AM
1

I do think there's no intended harm Once you extend your production line to include items that would allow parents to forcibly indoctrinate their children before they're old enough to even have an emotional/social identity then you have committed harm, and intentionally so. That's why you're being downvoted. This isn't hard to understand.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 11:50 AM
-2

Imagine if they designed underwear with a bulge in the front for 4 year old girls, there would be an uproar. Fucking pedophiles, how fragile can your ideals and ego be, that you have to physically force them on toddlers. Jesus..
/r/MensRights27/04/22 11:44 AM
2

Yes, water has been officially declared to be wet.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 10:15 AM
1

Because he's a man. Him winning a domestic violence case, not to mention one where false charges were presented by the woman, is a giant "fuck you" to feminism and the me too movement. They want to maintain the victim status and the "men are horrible abusers" title to fuel their victim mentality powered propaganda.
/r/MensRights27/04/22 08:44 AM
3

Two words: Victim Mentality
/r/MensRights24/04/22 08:59 PM
2

This is purely anecdotal, but here's my emotional experience with women. When I was 14, I had an emotional trauma of sorts. Around this time 2 women, my mother's age who were her friends, volunteered to "help" me. Suffice to say that after a short while it was blatantly obvious that they got bored (they responded less frequently and with less enthusiasm) and were doing it purely out of pity. At 18, I got into a relationship with a girl who I thought was my "soulmate". The first few months she wo…
/r/MensRights24/04/22 08:51 AM
0

You should dump her. Take your time to settle down and heal through your previous ordeal. You need to be in a more healthy mindset before you can choose who to spend the rest of your life with (if that's what you want). Making romantic/life changing decisions while being distraught by previous romantic affairs is always a recipe for disaster. Edit: judging by your comments, your current girlfriend doesn't care about you. She's in it for the money. You've been warned.
/r/MensRights19/04/22 10:57 PM
37

I remember seeing a bunch of people defending the feminists who carried out the white feather campaign by saying that back then, women weren't legally allowed to fight in the army and that the "patriarchy" was to blame. This just goes to show the absolute hypocrisy and cowardice these women have. They don't care about anyone but themselves, and they'll sacrifice anyone and anything to save their pathetic skins. When Ukraine gets through this, the men better protest to strip the women of their le…
/r/MensRights12/04/22 04:16 PM
18

FDS are a bunch of crazy bitches. There's nothing they would use or say that isn't radical or dehumanizing.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 11:58 AM
-8

Because they think (sometimes rightly so) that the person using it is dehumanizing them.
/r/MensRights10/04/22 11:47 AM
6

everything they describe as the patriarchy does exist, No it doesn't. The fundamental idea behind their claims is that: Men were oppressing women throughout history. Men were privileged throughout history and lived rosy lives. That the patriarchy is an evil scheme made by men for men. All of the above are hilariously false from a logical, societal, and historical perspective.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 09:35 AM
18

https://youtu.be/_9N6-VugF-E misses the point Actually his argument here is bang on. The idea that men were oppressing women is simply ridiculous. The truth is that society and societal structures have fucked us all over, men and women, since the beginning of time.
/r/MensRights09/04/22 12:19 AM
156

It's only natural that they'll hate him. The man shits on every radical belief that they hold dear. There's a video for him on YouTube that's about 6 minutes long where he absolutely demolishes the historical patriarchal oppression narrative. I might not agree with everything he says but he's one of the few remaining people with a solid intellectual and moral integrity.
/r/MensRights08/04/22 08:51 PM
3

Do a study to find out if most rapists outside of prison were victims of rape inside prison. I don't understand this part. Explanation please?
/r/MensRights01/04/22 10:21 PM
20

Stop identifying as a feminist if you believe in equality. Either create a movement and call it women's rights, or identify as an egalitarian. Feminism is a hateful, dishonest movement with an inferiority complex and it needs to die out if we as a society are to move forward.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 10:14 PM
20

I'm 179cm cries in 172 cm
/r/MensRights01/04/22 11:22 AM
1

The idea is to "protect" said women by keeping them in said urban areas. This is in the sense that these areas are safer, have better transportation systems, the women can visit their families more easily etc. As a man however you're expected to be somehow invincible to the same things that would endanger these women. Smh.
/r/MensRights01/04/22 02:37 AM
2

Because they hate men. 99% of feminists (in effect the whole feminist movement) are trauma survivors. They want total control, eternal victim status, and to exact revenge upon men.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 08:19 PM
8

I love how you keep replying with the same point to all the comments here while completely ignoring anything we say that's disadvantageous towards men even within second and third world countries as if such disadvantages don't exist. If anyone's the whiny self-centered baby, it's you. I am leaving this sub because this is not about Mens Rights anymore. It's still about men's rights, hence the post. I am leaving this sub You can fuck right off for all I, or anyone else here cares.
/r/MensRights31/03/22 06:04 PM
8

Okay you mega simp. Maybe it's so they dont have to deal with harassment & unwanted comments/touching. If that's the problem then create a law that punishes sexual harrasers regardless of gender instead of giving legal privileges and special legal treatment for women. Women are more often than not excluded from benefits guys receive. What benefits? Mandatory military service? Child support? Having your children taken away from you because you're automatically assumed to be the less qualified par…
/r/MensRights31/03/22 05:30 PM
7

Egyptian here. There are tram carts specifically for women (men aren't allowed in them) that cost half the price. To add insult to injury, you'll see women riding other tram carts that should, logically, be for men and hogging the seats while young and old men are kept standing. The government has issued a health movement specifically targeting women but no such movement has been issued for men. In Egypt we have mandatory army service for men (where you're absolutely humiliated) or failing that …
/r/MensRights31/03/22 05:13 PM
5

Men's Rights doesn't sugar coat its intentions. We as a sub focus exclusively on issues regarding men (hence the title). Feminism on the other hand focuses on issues regarding women (in most cases radically so) while hiding behind the notion that they support equality between the sexes.
/r/MensRights30/03/22 08:23 AM
9

I remember seeing a woman break down in tears because the only medically assisted fertilisation attempt that she could afford failed yet you have people like this who look down on their kids akin to garbage bags. Fuck this bitch, seconded.
/r/MensRights28/03/22 04:25 PM
4

Having a child is a game that most feminists like to play in order to gain power. You want a kid? Better do as I say. Want to get married in order to have kids? Accept my ridiculous illogical demands. A feminist wants 18 years of free income? Get pregnant from some guy (they lie about being on birth control) and ta daa! You just got free cash as child support. You get the idea.
/r/MensRights24/03/22 02:56 PM
2

As sad as it is, this kind of shit doesn't surprise me anymore. This has become almost the norm now.
/r/MensRights16/03/22 11:39 AM
12

It's been statistically proven that children are twice as likely to be abused by their mothers than by their fathers. Go fuck yourself.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 12:22 AM
52

The fact that the idea was the admiral's doesn't make those feminists any less responsible. They could've refused to participate if they had any human decency in them, but no, they enjoyed shaming those boys/men and forcing them to go die in the war.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 12:47 PM
8

They would hide and let the men die. Afterwards they'll say that since putin is a man, the patriarchy is responsible for the deaths of these men and they'll use it as an incentive to futher their political agenda. Will the fallen soldiers get any amount of respect? No
/r/MensRights24/02/22 12:32 PM
2

Respectfully OP, you're a moron. Your gf just told you that she constantly compares you to other guys (who she sees as more suitable) which means she imagines herself with them which means she doesn't love you; you're just convenient for her. This is also a type of emotional manipulation where someone tries to indirectly tell you that they're the valuable one in the relationship and that you're expendable. Yet after all this you're STILL with her. Break up with her now and find someone who has e…
/r/MensRights20/02/22 11:39 PM
1

Fighting a system isn't the same as being sexist. The same logical fallacy was applied during WW2 when dumb people would label every german they saw as a nazi. She can hate the patriarchy all she wants but the men around her, who didn't create said patriarchy, are innocent.
/r/MensRights15/02/22 02:22 AM
3

Ever since I first saw her a couple of years ago I knew she was gonna be a shitty dirtbag of psychological issues. Not surprised.
/r/MensRights31/01/22 11:37 AM
3

And people get mad when I say that feminists don't want equality, they want superiority.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 06:31 PM
1

So she hates men.. because of cultural beliefs? I expected at least some sort of trauma in her past to justify what she's feeling. Pathetic.
/r/MensRights20/01/22 05:39 PM
1

the most feminism has done for men is allowing them to not be shamed for crying. The correct meaning that you're inferring to is opening up the subject of men crying, and that's pretty much it. Men are still shamed as ever for crying, I bet you haven't seen a feminist holding a "male tears" cup have you?
/r/MensRights19/01/22 05:08 PM
6

No buddy you see, that's the point: the people who do these things are a "minority" in a sense, and they're all feminists.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 02:20 AM
16

You apparently haven't seen the "kill all men" hashtag. Not to mention the "teach your sons not to rape" rule, as if all men are inherently born rapists who fuck everything that moves. I could keep going but you get the point.
/r/MensRights18/01/22 02:16 AM
1

Meh. I like the principle behind the movement but the page was filled with hateful people who were spewing shit like treating women like objects, pump and dump, hurt them as much as you can etc. While I don't care about said women, I detest hypocrisy; you can't be hurt by someone, turn around and do the same shit they did, and then claim some moral high ground/victim status. Not to mention that as fucking rare as that maybe, some innocent loving women out there (if they exist) could be caught up…
/r/MensRights15/01/22 07:05 PM
1

Yes I do. What you're referring to is postpartum psychosis ( which is a more severe variant of postpartum depression) which happens approx. in 1 every 500 women (that's 0.2%). So yeah, while it is an excuse it's extremely rare and can hardly account for all the nonsense that's out there, which is my point.
/r/MensRights13/01/22 03:19 PM
3

For someone who claims that they don't care about a particular topic, this bitch sure talks about hating men a lot.
/r/MensRights13/01/22 01:55 PM
5

Oh jesus christ not another one. Postpartum depression while it does fuck up the woman's emotional stability, it doesn't inhibit her logical reasoning like alcohol for example. This means that a woman who commits a crime while in postpartum depression (in this instance let's say she kills a baby) is very much aware of what she's doing and could restrain herself if she wanted to. The closest example I can give is someone who beats up another person in a fit of absolute rage.
/r/MensRights13/01/22 01:50 PM
4

Yeah he's a fucking simp, same with steve harvey. Either he truly believes this or he's putting on a show to gain more female views. Cunt.
/r/MensRights29/12/21 11:01 AM
1

No. Fraudulent is the term you're looking for.
/r/PussyPassDenied26/12/21 09:50 AM
3

a man will never win in an argument against a woman This usually happens because men are taught that women are these delicate creatures who need their emotions catered to. Women use this societal conditioning to their advantage by pushing their arguments on an emotional basis. Solution? Stand your ground and "tame" her emotions with your logic provided that you're right and aren't being a dick about it. If this doesn't work then you're dealing with an infant and should probably run ASAP.
/r/MensRights09/12/21 05:17 PM
15

Men getting on their kness and risking a humiliating rejection = Fine Women getting on their knees and risking a humiliating rejection = blasphemy Equality right there 👏
/r/MensRights30/11/21 09:38 PM
3

BuT, BuT WoMeN aRe ObJeCtIfIeD.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 07:51 PM
6

Being recognized and respected is the same as being coddled? Fuck off.
/r/MensRights30/11/21 07:37 AM
1

They might, but would you rather try or suffer through humiliation and psychological torture the rest of your life?
/r/MensRights22/11/21 10:12 PM
3

Simple really. Step 1: set your phone on recording Step 2: gather her and her family up Step 3: trigger them. Open up the topic of you wanting to leave this toxic relationship and goad them into spilling their threats. Step 4: pretend to be defeated and end the discussion with accepting their terms. Step 5: take said recording to the cops, notifying them of possible incoming false charges against you and file a restraining order against her, and her family. Step 6: dump her and ghost both her, a…
/r/MensRights22/11/21 08:59 PM
17

Typical feminist. Whenever one of your flimsy arguments gets debunked you fly into an infantile rage and start shaming and blaming the other person. Cry me a river.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 06:08 PM
11

Lol what? You're putting words in my mouth. I never said that men aren't useful, I simply said that when it comes to decisions that involve children, or anything really, a woman can't take a decision against a man's will and then expect his help. You either plan this kid out as a couple, or don't. Any disagreements regarding this topic must be settled diplomatically or failing that, divorce. Don't go behind his back being a fraudulent, backstabbing ass and then come back crying for help or worse…
/r/MensRights21/11/21 06:01 PM
28

No. According to the lady's comment, the man merely "gave" her the sperm. She's the one who decided to have the child, or else she could've taken the morning after pill. She made the decision to have raw sex, she made the decision to not take a morning-after pill, and she made the decision to have the baby; all on her own. If you want to make a decision against someone else's wishes then bear the full consequences of said decision.
/r/MensRights21/11/21 05:50 PM
32

How stupid and brain-dead does someone has to be in order to miss such blatant double standards in their arguments? If you get a 100% of the decision making process why am I supposed to split the money and pay for something I didn't decide? Wut?
/r/MensRights21/11/21 09:38 AM
1

Dude, ignore him. I didn't bother to even read his dumb rambling. Two sentences in and he's already contradicting himself and projecting his childish behaviour onto others.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 01:50 PM
3

You had me in the first half 😂. I actually went onto Google and thought there was problem with my phone cuz I saw nothing.
/r/MensRights19/11/21 01:45 PM
7

I've seen this in real life too. Give me 10 people who have problems with discipline, social boundaries, and/or have trouble standing up for themselves and I guarantee you will find that at least 7 of them come from single mother households. Not to say that absence of a mother doesn't cause psychological harm to the child, but it's not remotely as bad as an absent father.
/r/MensRights15/11/21 09:33 AM
1

Feminism needs to come clean with its hypocrisy and its true agenda that is female supremacy, not equality. Either they get their head straight or they should be silenced and eliminated. By this point they're no better than the bloody nazis.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 01:26 AM
3

Steering away isn't giving up. You steer away from pointless discussions that gain you nothing, but pummel them to the ground if they try testing you or someone you love. Otherwise you'll exhaust yourself fighting battles that don't matter.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 09:38 AM
2

Debating with them isn't worth it. After debating with a few of them as well as sharing the same house with one, I've come to the conclusion that they simply don't want to hear truth nor facts. One here on reddit even went to all my posts and trash talked me when she couldn't win 😂. Spare yourself the trouble and just steer away.
/r/MensRights01/11/21 09:35 AM
5

Tell her blatantly that it's sexist and it hurts the kid's feelings. If she doesn't listen try contacting the kid's parents and get them to find another daycare.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 08:56 PM
9

No offense, your mother sounds like the manipulative type who would use the phrase "a real man does..." to control a man's behaviour. She's definitely in the wrong here. You didn't do anything rash so that's good. Next time try telling her that it's sexist or just ignore the situation.
/r/MensRights25/10/21 08:54 PM
1

She isn't communicating clearly as in she expects you to be a mind reader. This will only get worse as time goes on, not to mention she's probably looking to exploit you financially by paying for her "foodie" attitude. Run.
/r/MensRights23/10/21 04:01 PM
4

Ditto. I was feeling down and battling an addiction. I was confused and often didn't know what I was feeling, why or how to fix it. Decided after a while to trust her and came to her like 3 times telling her that: "I'm feeling down and I don't why". Her response was to tell me that I'm placing a burden on her, and that I'm always sad and depressed and she wouldn't want a husband that's as weak as I am. Thankfully, she's now my ex. I'm sorry you went through that.
/r/MensRights22/10/21 04:14 PM
9

Exactly my point. Thank you.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 01:35 PM
26

Oh absolutely. It would require a man to fully break down in tears to be even remotely taken seriously. Otherwise he's just laughed at and told to man up.
/r/MensRights21/10/21 01:17 PM
6

I'm anti feminist due to the ideological basis of the movement. Feminism is basically built on the idea that men are these heartless, privileged oppressors and women are the innocent and oppressed ones. This notion isn't just faulty from a historical perspective, as explained by Jordan Peterson here https://youtu.be/_9N6-VugF-E , but it also means that the whole movement isn't based on the desire for justice, rather vengeance and supremacy. Feminism has been, is and will always be, a hate moveme…
/r/MensRights21/10/21 08:52 AM
2

I don't think it's rape; the definition doesn't match as the man had sexual intercourse willingly with a woman. Instead it should be considered as fraudulent and the woman should be charged with all the child's expenses. But ofc we know that won't happen. It seems the best way to win this rigged game is not to play.
/r/MensRights18/10/21 01:06 PM
13

Instead of punishing and judging someone in pain how about you offer some sympathy first? OP is hurting so his vision is partly clouded but he isn't wrong all the way. Women generally tend to have easier, more comfortable lives, especially in the dating world. You think women don’t feel the HUMAN emotion of loneliness Yes, women do feel loneliness but it's so much easier for them to break out of it. Almost any woman at any given time can have a line of men waiting to get together with her so she…
/r/MensRights17/10/21 07:11 AM
29

No offense, but if I were you, I would consider finding me a new GF.
/r/MensRights16/10/21 08:21 PM
7

This takes me back to one forensic medicine class in med school. We were taught briefly on what post partum depression is; it's a depressive episode that some women go through after birth caused by a fluctuation in hormones. The women in question retain full logical capacity and rarely if ever (1 in a million or less) experience hallucinations or delusions. Anyways, our professor proceeds to tell us of a true story where a woman gave birth by C-section and had just awakened from anesthesia. The …
/r/MensRights16/10/21 08:16 PM
5

It's a blame shifting tactic. It also baffles me to end about how stupid it is. Men are the physically stronger sex, ofc they would form the majority of perpetrators in violent crimes. This doesn't mean however that other men's suffering isn't legit, or that women can't be violent themselves.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 05:08 AM
18

No one person can change the world no matter how hard he wishes or tries. The best thing you can do is apply the change you wish to see in the world in your life and keep speaking out. Given time, the movement will grow big enough to have a dramatic effect. Life's shit, but we gotta have hope.
/r/MensRights13/10/21 04:18 PM
1

The majority is not being forced to watch it. They are driven by their biological preference. The same thing that drives others to other fetishes. The rest of your reply makes no sense and contributes nothing to the topic's logical train of thought so I won't bother. Whatever floats your boat buddy.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 06:22 PM
0

And you read what I said right? You can't use the MINORITY to overshadow an effect experienced by the MAJORITY. The specific sample size doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 06:16 PM
11

All the pornstars who died of suicide or an overdose would beg to differ. All ex-pornstars with their testimonies about how horrid the industry is would also beg to differ.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 06:11 PM
0

I'm not ignoring anything. But when data is based, it's based on majority. That is simple statistics. I'm not going to ignore something that affects 99% of a certain population or group just because it doesn't affect the remaining, relatively minuscule 1%.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 06:08 PM
6

As I said, they are subjectively rare. The internet has about 4.6 billion users. Let's assume 0.5% of those like grandma porn, that's about 23 million people. So ofc you'll find a lot of videos in that specefic category. But compared to the total population, it's a miniscule portion.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 06:01 PM
5

You can't take outliers and subjectively rare fetishes and use them to overshadow the norm. The simple truth is that the examples you've mentioned constitute no more than 3% of porn consumption. The vast majority of porn consumed, and by extension those who use it are subjected to the rules I've stated.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 05:55 PM
6

Porn degrades women by sexually objectifying them into a bunch of big boobs, big ass and a pretty face. Not to mention rape porn. Porn degrades men by sexually objectifying them too into being a big penis with a never ending erection and stamina. Finally, porn degrades its consumers as in the addiction state as well as the negative mental and physical changes that accompany said addiction. For more info I would recommend listening to Gary Wilson and Ran Gavrieli.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 05:39 PM
-7

Maybe. But the way I see it, other jobs carry a possibility for mental/physical/social damage while porn almost guarantees it. Also, different jobs serve a purpose; they help society to grow and flourish. Porn does nothing but tear people and society down. How it's still legal is beyond me.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 05:11 PM
84

Honestly, porn degrades everyone involved. Men, women and it's consumers. The male dominance bit is flipping hilarious tho.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 04:20 PM
5

Damn. That went to shit real fast.
/r/MensRights12/10/21 10:49 AM
44

Thank you for this. The worst part is that it gets swept under the rug and dismissed as "girl talk" or harmless girl gossip.
/r/MensRights11/10/21 10:16 PM
3

People should teach their children not to hit anyone. Nothing to do with gender.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 06:32 PM
5

The day a jury would listen and deliver justice to man who has been assaulted by woman is the day I would do that. Look up Johnny Depp and Amber Heard.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 06:26 PM
3

No man nor I have ever said anything about smacking. The term is hitting back. If you're tough enough to throw a hit then take one in return. Don't go around hitting people expecting society to back you up without repercussions.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 06:24 PM
3

Being less accepted into the military where you are brutalized and sent out to die in wars is now oppressing? So you admit that women are privileged as being given housing? Great to know. 0.5% population difference is a majority? Yeah, no. Men act more on suicidal tendencies because they have no emotional support nor emotional education unlike women. They are also less likely to use suicide as a petty attention seeking tool, again unlike women. Male domestic violence is (typically) more gruesome…
/r/MensRights10/10/21 06:21 PM
3

Most deaths in war are men. Most homeless people are men. Most suicides are men. Men are domestically abused in the same percentage as women but they're instead laughed at. Rape of men has been ruled out as non-existent by offical constitutions across the world. Male DV shelters are shut down. Mens Rights conferences get shut down. Men who get falsely accused have their lives ruined without any compensation or justice being served. Men are raised ever since early childhood to not cry and suppres…
/r/MensRights10/10/21 05:51 PM
4

Personal anecdotes? There are thousands of posts here by other men having far worse stories than mine with an assortment of false rape charges, financial exploitation, emotional manipulation and much more. You're just coming to the conclusions that you want to hear without any actual research. Go cry male privilege somewhere else.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 05:33 PM
2

Yes. My own family lmao. Not just me though, but nearly all my guy friends too. These rules are pretty firmly established. The men you described more often than not were burnt by women acting that way and lashed out in vengeance. Not defending them, but yeah, there's that.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 05:26 PM
5

Ah yes, because decades of conditioning done and encouraged by women and different societies is definitely the fault of men who recieved it. Stop shifting the blame and accept the fact that most women act in trashy ways that are supported and encouraged by society.
/r/MensRights10/10/21 05:21 PM
16

I was raised this way too. Always respect women, never hit back if they hit you. Chivlary was a must and you would be shamed to hell and back if you didn't do it. You were always expected to somehow adhere to some fucking code that shifted and changed according to each woman unless you wanted to be shamed and ridiculed on a wide scale as a "not a real man". Girls and women were painted as these innocent angelic creatures who can do no wrong and they must be protected at all costs. Don't you ever…
/r/MensRights10/10/21 04:21 PM
26

They begin growing in the 4th week. Nearly 3 weeks before the SRY gene activates. Fun fact, the genes for nipples aren't located on either the X or Y chromosomes. They are part of the 22 non-sex chromosomes and only serve a purpose (breastfeeding) under the influence of the female hormones + prolactin. So not even this can be used as a scientific evidence of the ridiculous notion that the defualt of human babies is female.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 06:09 PM
59

Medical student here. This is complete garbage. A fetus starts off as a neutral "clay mold" with barely any external distinguishable human features. A structure known as mullerian ducts is always present. Under the influence of the SRY gene this duct shrinks and degenerates to allow the proliferation of another structure known as the wolffian duct which gives rise to the male genital system. In the absence of the SRY gene the mullerian duct FURTHER PROLIFERATES to give rise to the female genital…
/r/MensRights05/10/21 04:01 PM
2

From personal experience nearly all women see men poorly and hate on them in one way or the other. I suppose most of this comes down to influences from culture and media. Notice how I said nearly. Some rare jewels out there are sane humans, but are very hard to find.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 03:14 PM
2

They want equality untill it no longer benefits them. Classic parasite behaviour.
/r/MensRights05/10/21 07:55 AM
14

My feelings are considered worthless or nonexistent while women's feelings are supported and nourished to the point of being over inflated.
/r/MensRights04/10/21 02:56 PM
1

No ma'am. Being submissive isn't the same as being a property. All psychologically healthy men like to lead and to be dominant (doesn't mean to oppress or to own) and all psychologically healthy women like to follow and to be submissive (doesn't mean being owned). This is how the human psyche works. These two psychological concepts are complementary to each other and contribute to a healthy marrige and thus, a healthy household. Any man or woman who deviates from this natural model is almost alw…
/r/MensRights01/10/21 07:39 PM
1

It doesn't really need an analysis. Logically speaking, it's seen as an act of submission by the wife to her husband, and a sign of her incorporation into their household in which he's the leader (therefore respecting him). Though there are exceptions, generally when a woman refuses such a rule after being raised in said society, her reasons are more or less towards the ideas of kill the patriarchy and such which indicates an emotional and therefore, future marital dysfunction. At the end of the…
/r/MensRights01/10/21 09:54 AM
4

It depends. Where I'm from the wife doesn't take the husband's last name so it's fine. But if culturally taking the husband's last name is seen as a sign of respect, and she refuses to do it, then no thanks I'll pass.
/r/MensRights30/09/21 06:48 PM
4

Call the police and retreat. If a weak girl is slapping you, then send her to prison You're living in a fantasy land. You think the police would actually give a fuck? Men have been abused and were met with nothing but laughter and mockery when they tried to report it. Also, have fun trying to call the cops when a girl is hitting you repeatedly and more often than not, using a weapon.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 10:39 PM
4

A woman isn't a child. She knows better yet she'll more than not, choose to mess with the man because she expects societal protection for her garbage attitude. Protecting yourself sometimes means you have to knock the other party out Building onto my pervious point, I want you to watch clips of women hitting men unfairly. Not a single one of them is just hitting the man weakly. They keep trying to viciously hurt the man and re-engaging after the man tries to back away.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 10:32 PM
6

We're promoting self defense and breaking the cycle of exploitation of social rules by women to freely hit men. Should I go and hit a random woman out of the blue? Absolutely not. Should I punch a woman's lights out when she hits me thinking she can get away with it just because she's a woman? Fuck yes.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 09:46 PM
10

We're incels and weak because we refuse to accept a movement that hates and demonizes us as men? Lol ok. Btw, if you're looking for simple minded idiots to get triggered and "come at you" then you came to the wrong place. Try r/feminism. Have a good day.
/r/MensRights29/09/21 12:58 AM
2

Trying to reason with a feminist is like trying to get a lion to become vegan; it's impossible.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 08:13 PM
53

They think kissing these women's asses will get them laid. I have nothing but pity for them.
/r/MensRights28/09/21 12:13 PM
3

I would give you an award if I could. Absolute gold stuff this is.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 10:24 AM
0

Aside from feminism, about 1 in every 30 women is a decent person. That's about 3%. A good woman is even rarer to find. Have fun.
/r/MensRights26/09/21 10:23 AM
2

You wouldn't call yourself a feminist OP if you truly understood the movement and its true intentions. With such an open and compassionate mentality you belong in the egalitarian community.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 11:59 PM
1

Depends largely on the age of the kid and the extent of what happened. Anywhere from a brief suspension to a straight expulsion and jail time is acceptable. The same punishment is to be applied for girls and false accusers.
/r/MensRights12/09/21 02:30 PM
3

A white knight in a white shirt. Unironically fitting.
/r/PussyPassDenied11/09/21 11:04 PM
3

I've explained, in detail, why I think that feminism is horrible right there 👇 https://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/pdnoyh/whenever_i_talk_about_anything_gender_related_and/hasa6e5?utm_medium=android_app&utm_source=share&context=3
/r/MensRights09/09/21 06:52 PM
2

It's not just feminists. Women in general use shaming as an aggression tactic to compensate for their lack of physical strength. Whatever they don't like they shame and ridicule to the point of social death and isolation. Look up the white feather movement.
/r/MensRights09/09/21 10:23 AM
0

Sounds like a case of BPD. I would be very careful. Collect all the legal evidence you can to defend yourself if things get hairy, and avoid the bitch like wildfire.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 06:55 PM
1

Then I can choose to divorce her and not pay a cent for the child. If she decides to keep it or have it against my choice then she has to bear the consequences in full amount. Or at the very least, I can sue her as a case of deception and she would be off to prison the moment the child is born.
/r/MensRights07/09/21 02:37 PM
2

The moment she said: men (and boys). I was done with the post. Some feminist garbage that aims to lecture men on how to be 'real men' while not doing the same for women. Also, instead of saying not all men how about you raise the empathy by saying that many women are abusers and heinous people as well so we shouldn't generalize and instead look at each other as flawed individuals instead of lumping a whole gender in. Some pathetic woke crap this is.
/r/MensRights05/09/21 02:47 PM
1

What an absolute shame. Imagine the families of those 11 men. Their sons, husbands, fathers or brothers fought and died and they don't even get a mention. But hurray for feminism and female empowerment amirite?
/r/MensRights04/09/21 10:07 AM
3

Hard to be one anywhere really. Here in Egypt it's the same old tale. While men here have some "advantages", the social state will ultimately favour women in the end.
/r/MensRights02/09/21 01:02 AM
12

Creating a movement that addresses the issues of one group isn't injustice. Creating a movement that promotes the issues of a certain gender in a radical one-sided fashion while hiding behind the facade of equality for both sexes IS injustice. And yes, I will ignore your previous message regardless. Have a good day.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 04:11 PM
10

Men's rights never used the "fighting for both sexes " argument. Both the sub and movement exist to serve one group of people; men.
/r/MensRights29/08/21 03:47 PM
74

I agree. Feminism is nothing but hot garbage with an inferiority complex under the disguise of equality and justice. If these people truly wanted equality they would go for egalitarianism but I guess it doesn't sound as cool or "empowering".
/r/MensRights29/08/21 09:32 AM
5

Absolutely. That fetus isn't a part of the woman's body. It's an entirely different organism and many immunological factors take place within the woman's body to prevent its expulsion. Not to mention it took the man's sperm to make it and in most cases he's the one having to pay for the majority of baby's expenses. It's a 50/50 situation.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 04:42 PM
0

While your sentimental message certainly makes sense, it doesn't logically apply well to the real world. How would you know that the other spouse was actually supportive? Thousands of people raised by or living with narcissists would tell you about the immaculate mask these individuals wear in public while being nothing but abhorrent monsters in private. Also 50% is a huge amount. For a millionaire or a billionaire this wouldn't make much difference but for the average person this can ruin their…
/r/MensRights27/08/21 04:04 PM
8

Even if it was a man. Enough is enough. Hit her back with the same force, yes. But she's already down so no need to hit again and again unless you're fueled with hate. What happened to you is wrong, doesn't mean it should become mainstream.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/21 09:35 AM
0

No such thing. We're humans, if you can't control your anger, with an already incapacitated target nonetheless, then you're the issue; you've got something wrong.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/21 09:34 AM
44

I agree with him hitting back. But that was an overkill, and the girl in the purple dress didn't deserve that. This is setting a bad example for men who refuse to be hit by women and be silent.
/r/PussyPassDenied27/08/21 09:18 AM
-4

They were parasites backed up by obsolete and sexist laws. Nothing more.
/r/MensRights27/08/21 08:51 AM
3

Men; actual humans beings with emotions and self-respect, need to feel desired and loved as who they are. Holy shit, who would have guessed.
/r/MensRights26/08/21 09:10 AM
93

Stop scrolling through that sub. The levels of stupidity will cause you to lose brain cells by the second.
/r/PussyPassDenied25/08/21 12:17 AM
3

Good riddance. I hope they ban me next 😂
/r/PussyPassDenied22/08/21 02:26 PM
3

Document details and secretly record her. If you can get solid evidence call the police on her.
/r/MensRights22/08/21 05:06 AM
1

Yeah, massive shoutout. You ladies give me hope for the female sex.
/r/MensRights21/08/21 03:15 PM
1

You flattened him out with evidence. You've left valuable info for other people to use and learn from. Dickhead blocked you. Those are 3 major benefits I see. The response is much more than pleasant I say!
/r/MensRights19/08/21 04:11 PM
3

Oh absolutely. They are often called the fairer sex, the caring sex and other nonsense along those lines. Speaking from personal experience, their true faces are uglier than you would imagine.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 08:36 PM
117

It's not just reddit. Nearly all social media these days have jumped on that wagon.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 08:28 PM
4

By that logic, if a woman orgasms from being raped because you know, her nerves were stimulated against her will then she wasn't getting raped because she felt pleasure. Einstein was right, human stupidity knows no bounds.
/r/MensRights16/08/21 11:42 AM
2

Get a lawyer and document any and everything that you can find to prove your innocence then divorce her ass and go mgtow.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 01:29 AM
3

Yeah, no. While you do make a fair point the whole basis of this argument is that most women claim that their lives are so hard and that they "don't need no man" while sitting on their asses in an air-conditioned office and being blatantly ignorant to the services these men provide. It's not the difficult jobs that are the issue rather it's the disrespect and lack of gratitude that these women show.
/r/MensRights11/08/21 12:52 AM
13

They're either incredibly stupid or incredibly hypocritical. Either way, you're wasting your time on them.
/r/MensRights10/08/21 01:50 AM
1

You can't ask a question based on a notion that will never exist. It's called FEMinism. It will never be about equality rather, female superiority.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 06:10 PM
7

Most young guys as well tend to think of women as these soft, caring, goofy and almost childlike creatures. They aren't; most of them are fucking ruthless and will screw you over without breaking a sweat.
/r/MGTOW225/07/21 11:30 PM
9

As an Egyptian, thank you so much. I've never known about this untill now. Turns out that the false, illogical and poorly researched feminist screeching is the same across the globe.
/r/MensRights15/07/21 06:03 PM
3

Simply state your opinion on the matter in the best, most polite way possible. If they choose to blatantly ignore your request simply distance yourself from them. Don't cut them off or anything but remove them from your inner circle.
/r/MensRights10/07/21 01:29 AM
1

A bunch of crazy feminists. What were you expecting?
/r/MensRights09/07/21 02:47 AM
3

For me it happened once i realised that beauty is temporary. Even the prettiest of women will grow old and "ugly" so to speak but their personalities won't. Be careful of wolves in sheep clothing though, test your woman multiple times before you can fully trust her to know if she's the real deal or not.
/r/MensRights31/05/21 09:48 AM
6

Gorgeous looking. But selfish This right here, seems that you might be favouring, and pursuing looks first. That's a big no-no as it is extremely rare to find a good looking woman (or man) who is nice. Personality first.
/r/MensRights31/05/21 07:39 AM
2

+1. I honestly think the only reason she improved was because she didn't want to lose on the monetary benefit he was starting to accomplish.
/r/MensRights17/05/21 08:57 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter