TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

IrascibleTruth Archive

View 7 posts and 245 comments by IrascibleTruth on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

Exactly. They should be angry - but they also shouldn't do this to men.
/r/MensRights19/10/20 02:29 PM
3

If it is just you and several feminists: Ignore them/walk away. Mobs are almost impossible to sway. If it is just you and one feminist: The likelihood of immediately converting them is near zero. If you do have a good insult, zinger, etc then use it to apply pressure. Your goal here is to express disapproval, and apply social pressure. They need to know that not everyone agrees. Take no risks. Say nothing if your job, social media, sales prospects, etc. are threatened. If there are neutral spect…
/r/MensRights19/10/20 02:07 PM
0

Perhaps what he has proven is that German liberals have no clue?
/r/MensRights19/10/20 01:56 PM
1

Wow, that put me in my place. #debunked
/r/MensRights19/10/20 01:48 PM
1

For most of the history, men and women got each other's backs. I doubt that very much, especially in India. Why did the custom of settee arise? Why does it make sense to burn a woman alive when her husband dies? I'll give you a hint - it cuts way down on the rate of spousal homicide committed by women. No more poison in hubby's meals.
/r/MensRights02/10/20 08:57 PM
1

What are "forced" and "voluntary" hypergamy?
/r/MensRights06/09/20 05:11 PM
1

Because that is what constitutes our "male privilege".
/r/MensRights29/08/20 01:13 AM
26

This is like saying the flat earth is a problem, because more women fall of the edge than men. Body positivity denies reality. I'm fine with there being no body positivity movement for men because imho it should not apply to anyone. What I endorse is a clear, unsentimental appreciation of reality. Ugly people get worse mates. Obesity is bad for you. If women don't like micro-penises, then so be it. Muscular men are attractive to women. Men prefer feminine women; women prefer dominant men. In the…
/r/MensRights29/08/20 01:09 AM
7

At this point, the thing to say is: If they can't be successful, can't make it given equality and the same opportunity - then they must be inferior?
/r/MensRights27/08/20 09:06 PM
1

Same thing a feminist told me once when arguing over what equality means..."Egalitarianism is a tool of the patriarchy." To which one might reply: And nonsense is the tool of the left. That is dialectic, though. Perhaps something more rhetorical: You mean that: Ignorance is Strength, War is Peace, and Egalitarianism is Patriarchy
/r/MensRights27/08/20 09:04 PM
1

My point exactly.
/r/MensRights19/08/20 04:31 PM
3

Apparently, he was not raised correctly. Perhaps HRH QE2 never let Prince Charlie have his own testicles, so he was unable to raise Philip and Harry correctly?
/r/MensRights18/08/20 06:04 AM
4

The correct notion is that everyone should already have a long gun, and a concealed carry.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 06:02 AM
3

Men reacting, you mean, not the victim, but the cognizant authority which fires him? Yeah, pure cowardice.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 06:01 AM
6

War is peace Freedom is slavery Ignorance is strength and of course, Kissing is Rape You can tell you are dealing with the left, when words are completely redefined. Privilege, rape, violence, safety - the list keeps on growing. Even 'man' and 'woman' are up for redefinition, according to some.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 06:00 AM
41

Pretty much the same as what happened to Gian Gomeshi in Canada.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 05:58 AM
1

This goes to the problem Dave Chappelle outlines: How old is 15, really? As to the different standards for boys and girls, fair enough, it is an issue.
/r/MensRights18/08/20 05:44 AM
1

Are you allowed to home school in Wales?
/r/MensRights18/08/20 05:42 AM
1

I’m here for the memes but I totally see the double standard. I agree, with a caveat. The caveat is that in this case, the same standard should apply to men and women. In others, because men are not women, there should be (and often are) different standards. The famous stud/slut dichotomy, for instance, is not a double standard, because men and women have completely different reproductive strategies. What requires demonstrations of excellence from a man requires only willingness from a woman. Th…
/r/MensRights14/08/20 02:14 AM
3

Which makes it an outstanding reply if you are told to "man up!" I will remember this, and keep it in mind to use. While I would prefer to always conduct reasoned, rational discussions, I realize that is not the case. As Aristotle pointed out, some people can not be swayed by facts. These people can only be reached by rhetoric, not dialectic. I can see situations where "Get Back in the Kitchen" would be outstanding rhetoric!
/r/MensRights23/07/20 04:28 PM
4

Outstanding! I would like to see e.g. Tyler Kost do something like this.
/r/MensRights23/07/20 04:28 PM
1

Patriarchy - just another Leftie conspiracy theory
/r/MensRights04/07/20 05:12 PM
1

How this is allowed to stand is beyond me. Critical Legal Studies is the guiding principle behind the judicial activism of our current kritarchy Every judge that was appointed by Johnson, Carter, Clinton, and especially Obama has steadily eroding the constitution. This was also why FDR tried to pack the Supreme court.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 02:39 PM
1

Correct. In fact, the Equal Rights Amendment was defeated under the lead of Phyllis Schlafly based on the preservation of female privileges - such as alimony, immunity from conscription (this was during the Vietnam War), etc. Women want equal privileges; they clearly do not want equal responsibility.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 02:27 PM
1

Women invented sex? That's ... interesting. And here I thought sex was a further refinement of bacterial conjugation. Which bacteria were men and which were women? Does that gets "assigned" when they split through fission? Or is it just that bacteria are gender fluid? That slime isn't bacteria at all ... it's a puddle of gender fluid! When it comes to being anti-science, nothing beats the left.
/r/MensRights15/05/20 09:23 AM
1

Both peace and war are also feminine. Which, when combined with your point, sort of shows how confused the feminine can be at times ... :-)
/r/MensRights15/05/20 09:19 AM
1

Shakespeare had bollocks. The theory that he didn't, is bollocks.
/r/MensRights15/05/20 09:18 AM
1

Yeah. Not content with lies and conspiracy theories like: Patriarchy Wage Gap Gendered domestic violence Suitability for parenting Massive, universal discrimination against women Claims that sex roles are a "social construct" instead of biological instincts They have moved to outright nonsense.
/r/MensRights15/05/20 09:16 AM
1

Wimin wuz kangz!
/r/MensRights15/05/20 09:13 AM
5

civil rights attorney Well there is the problem. You have a right, or you don't. There is no such thing as a "civil" right. The whole idea is ludicrous - that membership in some specific group gives you extra rights. In fact, instead of "civil rights", they should be called "collective rights".
/r/MensRights15/05/20 09:10 AM
11

Communist Loonies is more like it. American Communist Loonie Units.
/r/MensRights15/05/20 09:07 AM
0

What the fuck is your problem?
/r/MensRights06/05/20 02:04 AM
0

You won? Great. And sometimes people win the lottery. That can not be generalized into "playing the lottery is a good idea". Dunno what you're so insecure about Gee, I wish I had long-distance telepathy, so I could be a mind reader like you! Dismissed As if you are the emperor of Reddit? The secret king of the discourse? No. What you are, or at least are clearly acting like, is a gamma male.
/r/MensRights06/05/20 01:52 AM
1

Yes. Hopefully it will stop being the place where over-the-hill European league has-beens come to collect a big paycheck instead of retiring. That will only happen when washed up Euros are no longer good enough ...
/r/MensRights03/05/20 09:56 PM
2

Of course. It is no accident Pulisic went to an overseas academy ...
/r/MensRights03/05/20 09:29 PM
3

It's coming, but slowly. Guys like Pulisic, Yedlin, McKennie, Steffen, Adams, Brooks, Weah, etc show that Americans are slowly raising our game. Unfortunately, it is a slow process. The concussion issue in American (tackle) Football is probably the biggest help here. The middle class is more likely to encourage (or allow) soccer than US football; eventually this may filter down.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 09:13 PM
1

Absolutely. The unusual exception invalidates the rule. Or it does if you are an idiot.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 09:09 PM
2

Functional, not quality level. Or are you saying their purpose and methods are markedly different as well?
/r/MensRights03/05/20 09:03 PM
4

Agreed. By the way, this is also the case in Hockey. The women's Olympic hockey teams regularly scrimage against (and loose to) high school boys teams.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 11:23 PM
7

Conscription yes. This was the reason men without real property were given the right to vote, after the Civil war. Also the duty to respond to hue-and-cry laws, fire brigades, and much else.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 10:39 PM
3

The courts favor the parent that fights the hardest and the longest and has the most legal and moral ammunition on their side. I call BS. There is a pro-female bias in family court, plain and simple.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 10:29 PM
0

Because of centuries of propaganda. Also, women are better with infants; they are more attuned, and more obsessive about safety. When children get older this is smothering, but early on it helps; that's why having a father in the home to counterbalance overprotectiveness after a certain age is so important.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 10:28 PM
3

No, lets do generalize. Feminism is entirely about privilege without responsibility; power is just a subset of the privileges they seek. The vote without conscription Equal pay without equal work Equal opportunity without equal qualifications Equal respect without equal merit ... The list goes on and on; those are just a couple highlights
/r/MensRights02/05/20 10:25 PM
2

Either term on the left = Irrational feelings + Entitlement. I would go with: Women + Feminism = (Irrational Feelings + Entitlement)2
/r/MensRights02/05/20 10:23 PM
3

But US soccer might be the one exception. Consider though, the USMNT failed to qualify in 2018. If they qualify in 2022, they should get much more cash. If they go deep - say the round of 16 like 1994, or the quarterfinals like 2002, or even better - revenue should spike.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 10:22 PM
2

Indeed. Women's soccer is popular with the Karens, and their daughters. That's about it.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 10:13 PM
6

Yes. Although to be fair, the U15 teams I know of that beat women's Olympic teams (Newcastle Jets defeat Lady Matildas, Dallas Stars U15 defeat USWNT) are both cases where the U15 side was a developmental team tied to a professional team. They're equivalent to the youth academies run by Chelsea FC, Ajax, Borussia Dortmund, etc. Still, under 15 is under 15 - even if you are destined to be a professional when you grow up.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 10:11 PM
3

it’s not the women’s choice to play only 3 sets No, it's dictated by their lack of endurance.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 10:08 PM
3

But a movement to bring a particular group out of it was good. Feminism was always about getting more privileges for women, without adopting greater responsibility. First wave (suffragettes) wanted male privileges without their duties. Voting, but not to be conscripted or have to respond to hue-and-cry laws, fire brigades, etc. Men got the vote only because of civil war conscription; women got it for nothing. Second wave (women's liberation) was about extra privileges (alimony, no-fault divorce,…
/r/MensRights02/05/20 10:05 PM
1

Not everyone agrees that "intersectional feminism" constitutes a 5th wave. For one thing, many feminists are still "gender feminists", aka 3rd wave, and reject intersectionality. You see this in e.g. the intersectional crowd fighting with TERFs like Germaine Greer.
/r/MensRights02/05/20 09:57 PM
1

the only ways in which women are naturally less capable Women are less intelligent, by about 4 points. The distribution of female intelligence is also more leptokurtic, so there are a lot less females geniuses (where the real accomplishments occur.) Women are different form men in disposition and personality. You can look up gender differences in the "big 5" personality traits. Which sex is "superior"? Depends. Do you value being able to protect and provide or bear and nourish? Actually, outside…
/r/MensRights02/05/20 09:54 PM
2

No shock there. Sex workers of any type are more or less outside of normal society; as such, you would expect them to think independently, form their own opinions, and not get shrill in the face of disagreement (given their overall level of being outside the norm.)
/r/MensRights02/05/20 09:49 PM
1

Well, I understand you might be weary of the continuous stream of "Ain't it awful" posts. You might be ready to move on to mobilizing for useful action. However, there is also a need to organize (aka recruit). For newbies, the red-pilling must happen.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 06:30 PM
13

Also, avoid any jurisdiction with common-law marriage.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 06:28 PM
17

There was a time when men didn't have basic voting rights! What changed was mass, industrial warfare. The state had to then rely on conscription. Men would not go to war without a say in politics (see, New York City Draft Riots), so the franchise was extended to anyone subjected to conscription. For most countries, women got it at the same time. In a few (e.g. USA), it took a decade or two. That's it: in almost the whole world, men and women gained suffrage simultaneously; in a few places, there…
/r/MensRights14/04/20 06:23 PM
3

There isn't a standard definition of 'Feminism' Except when femtards try to win by definition. Muh equality.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 06:19 PM
15

I'm convinced there are secret societies involved. Perhaps. Certainly the CIA funded Gloria Steinem and Ms. Magazine. Certainly doubling the work force, and tearing down the family, both benefit the custodial state.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 06:19 PM
51

As Karen Straughan pointed out somewhere in one of her videos: The first wave wanted male privileges (vote, enter contracts while married) without male responsibility (conscription, respond to hue-and-cry laws and bucket brigades, etc.) The second wave wanted extra privileges for women - Abortion on demand, affirmative action, women only spaces for the sisters but entry into all male spaces, no-fault divorce with alimony, welfare for single mothers, etc. The third wave is about extra responsibil…
/r/MensRights14/04/20 06:16 PM
2

No. It's a power grab. It also has to do with women resenting their inferiority.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 06:11 PM
3

Did you think that #PoundMeToo was sincere? Like anything feminist, it was an attempt to gain power. The support for Sleazy Joe is also an attempt to gain power. No inconsistency, from a Saul Alinsky point of view.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 06:09 PM
21

Most likely. The general attitude of women towards sex workers and pornstars is that they are scabs, tanking the value of vagina.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 06:05 PM
2

I would suggest giving Run Away with Me, Aquaman 2, and any other upcoming work from her The Stand a pass. Behavior should have consequences. In fact, no consequences is the female power fantasy.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 09:13 PM
1

Why not just use "male" and "female"? Is the applicability of the second word ("humanoid") generally in doubt, and in need of clarification? I mean, sure, feminist might say that men are not human - but they won't be further swayed by the use of this term.
/r/MensRights11/04/20 08:58 PM
3

I mostly put it down to ignorance. Feminism has spread a lot of falsehoods; if you only listen to them, you will wind up thinking: That all men have been steadily voting since ancient Greece, but women only got the right yesterday. That women were chattels (physical property - as if you could sell your wife to your neighbor so he would have two) That women never could work (sweatshops, anyone? Or the fact that the surnames Webster, Brewer and Baxter derive from women who wove, brewed and baked? …
/r/MensRights30/03/20 09:24 PM
1

Good point. Still, we need to re-introduce and promote the "broken home" terminology.
/r/MensRights30/03/20 08:58 PM
2

That's probably why they call it "intact", not "fixed".
/r/MensRights29/03/20 11:17 PM
2

I vote for "Evil C**ts" as a legal term of art, but don't expect to have much luck with that ...
/r/MensRights29/03/20 11:16 PM
5

many MRA believe that feminism was originally OK back in the 1st and second wave when they were advocating for Women's sufferage and the right to work Women have always worked. Who got burned in the Triangle Shirt Waste Factory Fire? Working class women have always worked - it's just the rich bitches who were kept out of the CEO slots that got the rich suffragettes worked up. As for suffrage - males who lacked property didn't have it either, until the era of mass conscription was met with armed …
/r/MensRights29/03/20 10:41 PM
4

And also because ... they don't realize that, to borrow Orwell's phrase, they sleep peacefully in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf. Any society unwilling to stand up for itself (i.e. conscript men when necessary) will soon be overrun. Of late it hasn't been necessary and the all-volunteer military is sort of working1 - we'll see if that holds. 1 I say sort of, because of stop-loss orders. Not everyone is happy having their careers in the Army …
/r/MensRights29/03/20 10:35 PM
5

Exactly. Some women do have that ability, but many do not. Regardless, they should not be there. My suggestion is that they should not be on the front lines, but should have to pull their weight. Hence, drafted into non-combat roles. Doctors, nurses, clerks, (maybe) air traffic controllers, ammunition technician, animal care specialist, automated logistical specialists, bassoon player (I kid you not, MOS 02K. Not a lot of those though), biomedical equipment specialist, broadcast journalist, carg…
/r/MensRights29/03/20 10:14 PM
7

Raising children is a tough job. Yeah. Right up there with roofing in July, if you're a redhead. Any job you can do in pajamas, that's taxing, right? Here's the routing those observations come from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L-gbacsUKpc
/r/MensRights29/03/20 10:05 PM
11

But to have to be drafted into the military That doesn't work for me. If women want equal rights, they have to take equal responsibility. However, I do observe that given the weight a Western soldier carriers into battle (in some cases as much as 200 pounds!), women are clearly not fit for combat. Then there are questions of reflex speed. Ask any martial artist who has sparred with a woman - it's like being up against someone in slow motion. There are also issues of unit cohesion, excessive conc…
/r/MensRights29/03/20 10:04 PM
1

probably a developed cultural practice No, gynocentrism is an instinct. Any tribe failing to focus on female needs was out-bred, out-numbered and out-right eliminated. Sure, having better technology (e.g. farming, which let the Bantu conquer most of sub-saharan Africa) helps, but once that diffuses it's back reproductive success and the god being on the side of the bigger battalions. From gynocentrism, specific cultural practices (like chivalry, or killing foreign males crossing the border, or t…
/r/MensRights25/03/20 03:33 PM
1

You may have a point there. Never the less it is an evolved instinct, and probably goes all the way back to our early hominid ancestors. It is thus not an Eastern vs Western this - despite evolution being recent, copious and local. I would also point out that modernity is only the last half dozen generations; I can't see any regional variation in selection pressure that would be strong enough to drive a selective sweep leading to differences in gynocentrism between populations since then. I also…
/r/MensRights24/03/20 07:40 PM
1

Well, watch No House, No Car and tell me ...
/r/MensRights24/03/20 07:19 PM
5

No. Like hypergamy, it is just basic evolutionary psychology. I despise it, but I understand that it's just natures way of prioritizing the precious brood mares over the expendable warriors.
/r/MensRights24/03/20 07:16 PM
1

I believe New York was trying to make it legal just after birth. Legal infanticide. What is this world coming to?!
/r/MensRights24/03/20 07:12 PM
1

Female politicians are no different than male politicians. That would be true if women were the same as men. They are not.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 07:47 PM
3

This is a funny issue because the answer depends on your overall view of abortion. If you think it's just a clump of cells, sure, woman's decision. If you think it's a human, then abortion is murder and anyone should have a say. This isn't really a man vs woman issue, although feminists present it that way. Really, it's about your views on what abortion is.
/r/MensRights23/03/20 07:44 PM
1

That's a bit much, but there are profound differences in bone and muscle structure. Men can recruit something like 98%+ of muscle fibres in a given contraction (although such extremes are not very repeatable; hence the term single life maximum.) For highly trained women, the number is more like 85% - which is the basis of the myth that women have greater endurance. It turns out that if men pace themselves, they have greater endurance than women do - which is why the fastest marathon times are tu…
/r/MensRights23/03/20 07:05 PM
1

At least superhero movies have the excuse of, well, magic. If I can accept a guy who turns into an unbeatable green monster when he gets mad - well then female superheros, radioactive spider bites, and all the rest are cut from the same cloth. On the other hand, Alias? Yeah, 134 pound Jennifer Garner tosses around Seal Team Six like they were matchsticks? Vox Day talks about the time a female martial artist came to his gym and wanted to fight a man. His sensei allowed it, and paired her up with …
/r/MensRights23/03/20 06:58 PM
1

It confuses me why laws could be gender specific. Because women are not men?
/r/MensRights23/03/20 06:50 PM
1

Originally, a fool or simpleton. Has come to mean (in the manosphere) someone who caters to or white knights for women - as you have to be a fool to do that.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 11:08 PM
17

Absolutely. The men probably still won anyway.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 11:05 PM
2

Downvoted because - what? Facts hurt someone's feelings? God damn liberals, and god damn feminists ...
/r/MensRights17/03/20 11:04 PM
1

Yes. Mind you, they shouldn't be on the front lines - but these days the tooth-to-tail ratio is weighted heavily towards "support". So yes, women could be drafted as REMFs - cooks, clerks, drivers, etc. It's ludicrous to imagine them in 100 pounds of kit, hauling a wounded 200 pound man with his 100 pounds of kit. Just not going to happen. I also can't see women hauling around 85-100 pound shells, let alone lifting them up and putting them in the 155's. As for pilots: remember Kara Hultgreen, ni…
/r/MensRights17/03/20 11:02 PM
1

Thanks, didn't know that one!
/r/MensRights17/03/20 10:57 PM
1

I never sign in to google to watch vids. However, hooktube fixes that. Change the url to https://www.hooktube.com/watch?v=x5KlGljHT8g and you don't have to sign in. Works with any youtube.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 08:03 PM
2

Yeah, go to Heartiste on gab, much different.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 07:59 PM
2

Conscription - which became necessary when war transitioned into a mass, industrialized phenomenon - was the reason for universal suffrage. Absent some stake and control in the system, men rioted against conscription, deserted, and generally resisted participation in the West's imperial wars.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 07:56 PM
10

The irony here is that most men couldn't vote either! Suffragettes led to women getting the vote at the same time, or (depending on the country) shortly after men did! This happened at the time war became an mass phenomenon, industrial in scale and with conscription. In order to keep the draftees from protest, rebellion, or desertion men were given a minuscule share of the power. Ironically, women got the vote but were not subjected to conscription. Because vagina.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 07:54 PM
1

They dealt firmly with boat-people refugees and shuffled them off to another country, so at least they got that right ... Most of Australia's prosperity, however, comes from what is in the ground there. If the Chinese ever want Oz's minerals, look out.
/r/MensRights17/03/20 07:49 PM
1

As if the entire parliament is any better?
/r/MensRights16/03/20 10:11 PM
0

This is what happens when you allow women to hold office ...
/r/MensRights16/03/20 10:10 PM
1

She has given her name to the Hultgreen-Currie syndrome, where a minor or trivial accomplishment by a woman is heralded with great fanfare. That link is to infogalactic, an anti-SJW version of wikipedia.
/r/MensRights16/03/20 10:08 PM
2

To the men, yes!
/r/MensRights16/03/20 08:53 PM
2

Well, Norah Vincent dressed up as a man for a year, and wrote about it in Self-Mad Man: One Woman's Year Disguised as a Man The pressure actually made her crack up, and she spent a brief time in a mental institution. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_Fp1tWokLM
/r/MensRights07/03/20 04:24 AM
0

Actually, we do. We need to be capable of all the arts of discourse, including dialectic (reasoned, logical argument) and rhetoric (emotional, persuasive speech). Think about Trump. Regardless of your politics, when he says "Jeb is Low Energy", or "Fake News", it is much more effective than a long carefully constructed argument. Conneramitch, it's probably that you are highly intelligent and thus prefer logical presentations based on reason and evidence. Alas, you (and I) are in a small minority…
/r/MensRights07/03/20 04:14 AM
0

I like to apply Conspiracy theory to feminist claims like "patriarchy". Also, man hating, or man-hating lesbian, can be effective.
/r/MensRights07/03/20 04:08 AM
1

So a man expressing how he feels is being like a woman? Put that way - completely categorically - no. That's a strawman. However, the idea that men need to be more expressive, that is an attempt to feminize men and society. The fact is women are much more about emotion than men - showing it, responding to it, manipulating others with it, expressing it, etc. Men manipulate the external world of things to get what they want. Women manipulate others to get what they want. Emotions play a huge role …
/r/MensRights07/03/20 02:57 AM
3

You do know that’s why suicide rates are higher for men right? You are correct that male rate of suicide are higher. Your assertion that stoicism is the root cause is unfounded nonsense. Such illogic ... is the type of thing which comes from people in irrational, emotional states. So is suicide. In fact, much more likely that promoting outbursts that reflect poor emotional self-regulation causes suicide, than that stoicism and masculinity do. Throwawaylol, time to throw away your sock puppet acc…
/r/MensRights06/03/20 04:03 AM
5

Wrong. Communicating your emotions - what is the point there hoss? The point is to get other people to help you, support you, come to your aide. For women that is necessary; men should be more able to handle their own shit. We have school shooters, not because men bottle things up more than they did in the past, but because they are less self reliant, less masculine, raised by single mothers and on psych drugs. Try to make men be like women, fail to give them masculine role models, and the lead …
/r/MensRights06/03/20 12:25 AM
7

I didn't say, don't have emotion. The fact is though, men are naturally more self contained and less expressive. The whole "men can cry too" thing isn't to empower men, it is to weaken them. At this point in time the West is suffering from a surfeit of masculinity, not a surplus.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 12:15 AM
8

Men should be more emotional when something hits your heart Yes, just another way in which men need to be more like women.
/r/MensRights06/03/20 12:09 AM
1

Step one is to see things clearly. Being MGTOW means, at least you see intersexual dynamics clearly. You are on the path!
/r/MGTOW16/02/20 03:13 PM
1

Or try to fix it.
/r/MGTOW14/02/20 12:51 PM
2

Get woke, go broke. Star Wars, Marvel movies, Ghostbusters, Harley Quinn ... the more converged these things get, the more they flop.
/r/MGTOW14/02/20 12:49 PM
0

Nice strawman, but "One instance of incompetent females proves all females are inept" is not a syllogism I made. However, it is illustrative. It is evidence. When enough bridges collapse (look up Florida International University), when there are enough software debacles - at some point it becomes evidence. get out of here with your bullshit conclusions. Some people can't handle contrary opinions. Does that describe you? Do you want this to be a safe space for leftism, feminism and communism?
/r/MensRights14/02/20 12:45 PM
1

I don't disagree. Furthermore, the only possible way to have any confidence in the process whatsoever is for all code to be public.
/r/MensRights14/02/20 12:42 PM
3

We need more women in STEM because - bugs are good? We need more women in STEM because - they don't care about methodology? What they probably wanted was a feminist "triumph" if this trivial app had actually worked. Dollars to donuts, Linus Torvalds could have knocked it out in less than a week, alone, and it would have worked.
/r/MensRights12/02/20 09:28 AM
3

Exploitation of the opposite sex, in other words. Women's forte.
/r/MGTOW12/12/19 03:26 PM
7

Is feminism hateful? Yes. Do you think that the culture at large will ever be brought to regard it as such? Remember, the appeal of feminism is emotional, not rational ...
/r/MensRights12/12/19 03:24 PM
3

everyone would accept that The saying in the USSR before the fall of the Berlin Wall was: We pretend to work, they pretend to pay us.
/r/AntiFeminists20/10/19 06:10 PM
2

The screenplay for the movie, yes. The comic book it was drawn from was written by someone else.
/r/MensRights19/10/19 08:29 PM
1

Perhaps a mistake, perhaps not. Some people aren't worth your time; he probably figured fuck them, they can go on being ignorant (and not meeting a famous screenwriter).
/r/MensRights19/10/19 08:28 PM
1

You're welcome. I am glad if it helps! Most of us are kind, reasonable, fair people. Unfortunately, we tend to assume others are as well. In my case, this led me to just not get it - that she wasn't going to come around, ever. Divorce was the only cure; getting divorced was one of the best things I ever did. Mind you, I think Ronald Regan's no-fault divorce has done irreparable harm to the country, culture and nation. That said, you just have to cut crazy or toxic people from your life.
/r/MensRights18/10/19 06:22 PM
-2

Women are better with infants, that's all. They are better at understanding them, better at caring for them. Once an infant grows into a child, the same instincts to overprotect and hover around it become counterproductive, which is why fathers are needed to push children to be on their own, and to be inflexible about holding them to standards. EDIT: Downvoted in MensRights for suggesting that maybe women aren't the perfect be-all, end-alls of humanty. Wow, if this is a pro-man subreddit, I woul…
/r/MensRights13/10/19 05:38 PM
1

Women probably are better with infants. Men are more important for psychological development for children. Almost all mass shooters were raised by single mothers.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 05:37 PM
2

Toxic masculinity? You mean, when women try to be men?
/r/MensRights13/10/19 05:35 PM
3

Sadly, most women are in the 8-10 range. Somewhere between 8 stone and 10 stone.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 05:35 PM
11

It's actually a function of the Protect My Tribe daemon; it just gets way, way more active when your progeny is under foot.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 05:34 PM
2

Probably only second to Family Court "Judge" for risk-free sociopathy.
/r/MensRights13/10/19 04:34 AM
2

One in 4 is female; the other 3 are unimportant.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 03:10 AM
8

The police lied to get a rape conviction. The prosecution lied to get a rape conviction. And undoubtedly faced no disbarment, dismissal, indictment for perjury or prosecutorial misconduct, or other sanction.
/r/MensRights11/10/19 03:09 AM
1

She can lecture you about masculinity, and how men or boys should behave. She can have an opinion about a war she will never be drafted to fight. Heaven forbid you have an opinion about infanticide!
/r/MensRights10/10/19 12:36 AM
1

Exactly!
/r/MensRights10/10/19 12:35 AM
1

Why don't men envy women? Consider this.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 07:00 PM
3

One wonders: Does a shift in how women are portrayed by Hollywood and the media have anything to do with this, especially for boys brought up by single moms and deprived of role models? Did cacophonous choruses over the decades shouting"Male Chauvinist Pig!" anytime someone brought up (true) aspects of female nature play a role here? The fact is that discussing women as they actually are was a thing as late as the early 1970's; now it is completely forbidden and instantly summons the hordes of "…
/r/MensRights08/10/19 06:52 PM
1

Right. Women, however, are not equal.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 06:49 PM
2

Oh come on, this is just as bad No, it is correct and accurate. Men are not women. Women are not men. Different brain structure, different instincts, different hormones. I agree that saying women don't understand consequences, remorse or responsibility is silly. They understand the concepts; they are just selfish and don't give a fuck. You can't solve that by going underground. You are only going to miss out on having a decent life yourself. Actually, he's going to avoid #PoundMeToo, leeching wo…
/r/MensRights08/10/19 06:48 PM
1

'focus on muslim and trans men'? Only if they are left handed and born in January. Seriously, could you do anything to make a "mens group" appeal less to almost all men? You want to help muzzies? Send them back. You wan to help trannies? Outlaw puberty blockers, and help people thinking they are trans realize they are either confused, or vanilla gays.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 06:42 PM
0

You seem unfamiliar with the concept of a fair fight. You seem to be unfamiliar with the difference between an educational beat down, and total war. You seem unfamiliar with the difference between reasonable force, and attempted murder. In bar/street fights, there are zero rules Have you ever been in a fight? There is the rule that you have to be able to look your mates in the eye afterwards. There is the rule "Don't do the crime, if you can not do the time", which limits the amount of harm by a…
/r/MensRights08/10/19 06:35 PM
3

I could not agree more. There is even a legal doctrine - "fighting words" - where crossing some verbal lines allows for a physical altercation. I doubt it holds much water any more, though. The whole "don't hit" thing is yet another sign of feminization.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 06:33 PM
1

You should never hit a lady. Alas, most women fail to be ladies. If women want to be men, then they can take the whole deal - which includes physical confrontation to settle disputes and/or establish the pecking order.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 06:30 PM
8

and she won't accept I don't want to now be with her? Who cares what she accepts. Association in this case is voluntary; you never need permission to end a relationship.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 06:26 PM
3

Standards are only for men Suggesting any woman ever need measure up to anything is misogyny. That's why 80 pound waifs must be allowed to become soldiers and firefighters, land whales must be used as bikini models, hitting back when a woman strikes you is domestic violence (by you, not her) and discrimination on behalf of women is "affirmative action". Welcome to feminist clown world. Honk honk.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 06:24 PM
-3

Billionaire matchmaker Anna Bey (pictured) never pays for a man under any circumstance, and believes women shoulder too many burdens like child rearing and household management Household management is a female agenda. They don't clean for you; they clean (if they do; Billionaires have domestic staff) then they do it because they want their house to impress other people. There is a reason bachelor pads are notoriously grubby. Men give a lot fewer fucks about how the place looks. Children are also…
/r/MensRights08/10/19 06:19 PM
4

Actually, it is. Everyone should do it, so that it becomes normal and nobody is singled out because of it. There used to be a utility that added naughty words like "revolution" and so on to the bottom of your emails, to fuck with the NSA. Now that everything is collected and nothing is private, the only thing to do is make all data irrelevant.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 06:15 PM
10

Except her natural hypergamy - a hard wired instinct - will then kick in. She will decide she can do better than a useless stay-at-home dad, and replace you with someone earning more than she does.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 06:13 PM
13

"Show your feelings" is right up there with "Just be yourself" as terrible advice women give men on how to be men.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 06:12 PM
20

“These shootings overwhelmingly, almost exclusively, are males, boys, ‘men’ — I put in loose quotes,” Newsom said during a press conference. “I do think that is missing in the national conversation.” What is missing in the national conversation is any mention of psychoactive drugs prescribed off-label to juveniles, and single motherhood.
/r/MensRights08/10/19 04:16 PM
1

Shades of the "Middle Ground" fallacy. Halfway between truth and a lie - is still a lie. Climate change though - did the polar ice caps melt 10 years ago like Al Gore said? Are polar bears extinct? How did the "hockey puck" stand up in court? There is actually room to discuss the climate models, the role of the sun, and much more. I'm with though you on flat earth nonsense, vaccines, feminism, and probably much more as well.
/r/AntiFeminists07/10/19 03:03 AM
1

Toxic masculinity is caused by the same as rabbit horns and sky flowers. You make a category error. That which does not exist, has no cause.
/r/AntiFeminists07/10/19 02:11 AM
2

Shades of that "So you're saying" woman interviewing Jordan Peterson.
/r/AntiFeminists07/10/19 02:08 AM
1

Your comment reminds me of an excellent video of Brigitte Gabriel responding to "Not All Muslims". The peaceful majority of any group is irrelevant. The peaceful majority of the Nazis, Russian Communists, Chinese, Muzzies, Japanese before WW2 - were irrelevant. The slaughter by each of those groups was enormous. With feminism - the sane minority is irrelevant, the radicals do all the damage. The radicals of any group drive its actions.
/r/AntiFeminists07/10/19 01:57 AM
1

Feminism is about equality Tell me one right men have that women don't Not all Feminists are like that I'm a feminist and I don't have men Not all feminists are extremists Not all Nazis hated Jews patriarchy Stop it with your conspiracy theories Women were chattels And doctors used to use leeches. Who cares about the past?
/r/AntiFeminists07/10/19 01:46 AM
5

For values of "equality" based on double standards and outcomes, yes.
/r/MensRights21/09/19 09:13 PM
2

Your attitude puts you above most people, even here in the West. You can be sad. You can also be happy that you were raised properly, or have good genetic stock, or most likely both - so that you have such a noble and wise attitude.
/r/MensRights21/09/19 09:10 PM
3

As far as I know, India is the only place to suffer so many husband murders that they took to burning the wife alive after her husband's death, just to discourage women from homicide. I don't think I will be chasing Indian women any time soon ...
/r/MensRights19/09/19 06:44 PM
1

Indeed not
/r/MensRights19/09/19 06:38 PM
1

They did it for their own ends, not ours. It was an attack on Britain more than support of America. Thus always between nations; I merely elucidate, not condemn. I will also point out that without the prominence of Whigs in Parliament at the time, the revolution would have been brutally crushed. However, the Tories found their hands tied, so fortunately America became free (until the second founding in the 1860's, but I digress ...)
/r/MensRights19/09/19 06:33 PM
3

To be honest, I have no wish for the state to have my DNA. I don't even want private organizations to have my DNA, as many of them collaborate with governments. I don't plan to commit any crime, but given the increasingly tyrannical nature of western governments, it seems best to keep as many tools out of their hands as possible.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 06:31 PM
2

You're welcome! I agree with the idea that some people prefer logic, and are able to apprehend even uncomfortable truths in that manner. However, the rest will in fact NOT feel a desire to learn logic in order to understand truth. They are creatures of emotion, not logic. In fact, logic is difficult. Thinking clearly is difficult. Having sufficient background to even begin to reason requires massive effort and study; once the province of education, this has gone by the wayside as our schools pum…
/r/MensRights19/09/19 06:28 PM
1

http://theredpillmovie.com/
/r/MensRights19/09/19 06:23 PM
1

You don't seem intelligent enough to understand what I say. By all means, feel free to cease reading what I write.
/r/MensRights19/09/19 05:58 PM
2

I favor freer markets than we have now, greater separation between government and economy, tariffs and other measures to promote domestic industry, but recognize the need for some regulation. Some specific policies/issues: No central bank. Andrew Jackson, best president ever; Woodrow Wilson the worst! No gender/race/orientation quotas; restore free association. Many fewer required licenses (allowing, for example, anybody to cut hair!) A focus on enforcement after the fact, rather than certificat…
/r/MensRights18/09/19 07:25 PM
1

Well, red flag laws are mostly being discussed, not widely enacted (yet).
/r/MensRights18/09/19 07:13 PM
3

I AM NOT A LAWYER Which is why you think "simple logic" has anything to do with the law. Once, perhaps. Now with the Duluth model and presumption of male guilt, not so much. Such a view is charming. It is perhaps a reflection of your good (albeit naive) character that you think red-flag laws would not be enforced against men on behalf of women. Did you learn nothing from the #PoundMeToo debacle?
/r/MensRights18/09/19 07:12 PM
1

it hurts the reputation of MRAs. Tone policing so that females regard you as harmless? Aggressive memes and vicious online sarcasm, gamergate and forceful advocacy have done more in the last 2 years to combat feminism than 100 years of the Men's Rights movement. You are probably a high IQ individual, one who is reached by logic and argument (dialectic) rather than emotional appeals (rhetoric). For rhetoric people - most of humanity, and all of the dumb ones - the only way to reach them is thorou…
/r/MensRights18/09/19 06:55 PM
0

"labor theory of value". So labour has no value to you???? Did I say labor has no value? Don't be spinning my words into some false dichotomy. No, I said the Marxist "Labor Theory of Value" is nonsense. Don't go misrepresenting my words. === I agree that any opposition to unrestrained free trade is good, be it from a Communist gun-grabber like Bernie or be it from a "Rockefeller Republican", civic nationalist like Trump. The nonsense economists spout about "comparative advantage" has little or n…
/r/MensRights18/09/19 06:50 PM
0

So we are being exploited more. No, you were getting a smaller cut of a bigger number. You are calling it "exploitation", probably because you subscribe to nonsense like the "labor theory of value". Again, not saying there hasn't been decline since the 1950's - only that paleocon policy would have prevented that instead of causing it the way leftist - and globalist - policy has.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 05:34 PM
4

Exactly. Votes, but not conscription. Economic participation, but quotas instead of competition. Bill Burr does a great bit on this sort of female privilege
/r/PurplePillDebate18/09/19 05:28 PM
0

Perhaps. A large percent of a tiny number, is less than a small percent of an enormous number. Really, this just seems like jealousy. Someone has more cake, that they themselves baked, so it must be unfair! If the Middle Ages - plagues, warring nobles, high religiosity, social stratification, widespread illiteracy, hard labor - seems to you like a golden era then I suggest emigration to Africa, or perhaps the Middle East, as closer to that way of being. I'll stick with indoor plumbing, vaccines,…
/r/MensRights18/09/19 05:21 PM
0

Which words were misused?
/r/MensRights18/09/19 05:19 PM
1

You seriously think MacKinnon lives by socialist principles? Yes. To the revolutionary vanguard go the spoils. This is not socialist dogma, but socialist reality. Why the HELL would the CIA want to fund communism I can only speculate, lacking the necessary clearances and "need to know". Certainly feminism destroyed the institution of the family, and family was the only institution with more power than the government. The CIA was all about control - look up "MK Ultra" and the mind-control experim…
/r/MensRights18/09/19 05:17 PM
-2

The New Deal allowed the prosperity of the 50s to happen. The demolition of all rival economic powers in Europe and Japan allowed the prosperity of the 1950's to happen. roaring twenties Hardly constitute your claim of "human history". -==- Again - the increasing inequality is due to regulation, financialization and globalism - not due to capitalism qua capitalism, and certainly not due to conservatism. In fact, it is important to understand that unrestrained, free market capitalism is NOT conse…
/r/MensRights18/09/19 05:09 PM
0

Again with personal attacks in lieu of substance. What makes you so venomous? PS - Google for mid-sized words? Are you projecting here?
/r/MensRights18/09/19 05:06 PM
2

then you realize that you're judging your worth by whether or not you are objectifiable to a man So much confusion! Sexually attractive is not objectifiable; that is feminist tripe. Her unconscious topic here is "sexual market value" For some reason, she is conflating her self worth with her perception of her sexual market value The sexual marketplace is not "patriarchy", it is the sexual marketplace. "Like somehow that's a desirable thing" - yes, high SMV is desirable (for both sexes). That's j…
/r/MensRights18/09/19 05:03 PM
5

Upvoted, because you were inexplicably downvoted. Creating symbolic variables and setting this down mathematically might not appeal to everyone (and not to me), but I see no reason to downvote it!
/r/MensRights18/09/19 05:00 PM
-1

Grow up. Is psychologizing your interlocutor considered mature? For whatever reason, you seem mired on the lower levels of the argument pyramid.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 04:56 PM
-3

Wealth inequality is NOT the worst it has been in human history. It is going the wrong way, but industrial capitalism has lifted more people out of grinding, peasant poverty than any other force ever. You are correct that since the globalist, leftist takeover things have declined. This is not the conservative agenda. Conservatives are not blindly pro-business. Watch the Tucker Carlson video with Charlie Kirk, where he demolishes Libertarianism. THAT is a conservative view. Hillaire Belloc, G.K. …
/r/MensRights18/09/19 04:54 PM
-1

The votes may in fact speak for some sort of brigade, or for the overall leftist lean on reddit. "Just like the radfems"? No, that would be about denying reality. "Not welcome here" - is this an echo chamber? Are you too precious to withstand different views?
/r/MensRights18/09/19 04:47 PM
-11

I'm not looking to "be better". We can take the high ground after defeating feminism. Principles are for winners, of use in shaping what comes after. During conflict, it's "by any means necessary." Right now, feminism has the upper hand. Hamstringing ourselves with politeness - that's akin to how conservatives cucked and allowed Western Civilization to be overrun and destroyed by the Frankfort School.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 04:44 PM
-2

You do realize that an appeal to popularity is a fallacy, right? You do realize that you have not been appointed the official spokesperson for everyone, right? You remind me of the knuckleheads wailing when Trump won, because everyone thought he was an idiot. Apparently, not everyone!
/r/MensRights18/09/19 04:41 PM
-3

You mean, she is a token hire?
/r/MensRights18/09/19 04:37 PM
3

Classic leftist firing squad; arranged in a circle.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 04:36 PM
1

Mightyoak123, your comment fails to account for the semiotics of modern life. In this culture, since the pill and the sexual revolution that started in the 1960's, premarital sex has been commonplace. At this point premarital sex is actually much more commonplace than saving it for marriage. Given such widespread fornication (yes, I'm channeling Dana Carvey's Church Lady), most men will have at least some opportunity to get laid. Now, men and women have different instinctive reproductive strateg…
/r/MensRights18/09/19 04:33 PM
1

Indeed. We "construct" the hymen, socially.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 04:18 PM
8

Believe all women! /s
/r/MensRights18/09/19 04:16 PM
4

At least OC spray? Sadly, those previous police reports she made could affect his ability to do as you suggest, what with the current enthusiasm for "red flag" laws.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 04:15 PM
3

Not to mention quite stalkery. The only real-life stalker behavior I ever experienced was from a woman. I took an out of town phone call while volunteering at my church, from a woman seeking contact information for a former partner. When I contacted the partner, I found the woman had been stalking - and was glad I never give anybody's personal information to strangers.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 04:13 PM
7

Almost. If you are verified, keep it as a "rump" account with no content. The goal here is to prevent anyone from generating false content in your name.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 04:10 PM
8

Secondly, pull your boss aside and let them know the full story. I would not have thought about that. It's sort of like when you have to injure an attacker; the first one to call 911 and tell the police is presumed to be the good guy. Warning your employer that your ex is insane will be similar; the first-to-mention-it is presumed to be the innocent party. neighbors ... you should also let them know the situation in case they start spreading rumors about you in your neighborhood And in case the …
/r/MensRights18/09/19 04:07 PM
4

The sad thing is, she got him arrested. Any red-flag laws would prohibit him from "gunning up" to protect himself from this obviously insane woman. Sure, weapons are a last resort. Even non-lethals like OC spray are desperate moves (but often better than anything fatal.) Remember that when seconds count, the police are only minutes away. They can also not be relied on to correctly separate aggressor and victim, when the aggressor is male. So in the end, you must protect yourself by any means nec…
/r/MensRights18/09/19 04:05 PM
1

If you have never experienced this, it will be shocking the first time it happens. You will think to yourself "well, she just lost it, we all have bad days." But it will become a pattern. She is trying to intimidate, control and dominate him, and has found this method to be at least somewhat effective. Once this shit starts, the odds of you "holding frame" as they say on TheRedPill, are essentially zero. She is not looking to negotiate. She is not actually "better than this"; this is who she is.…
/r/MensRights18/09/19 03:58 PM
1

She's hitting him right now, kicking him Never accept this. I would heartily discourage first use of force, but do advocate self defense. Better yet, leave her - even if you got married before she unleashed the psycho. Once this nature is revealed, it will never stop.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 03:52 PM
-17

Only women are stupid enough to realize that orbital communications go through a central location, and are logged?
/r/MensRights18/09/19 03:50 PM
2

Finland apparently based as fuck. They fought off the Russians, successfully. They had the most successful sniper, ever. Apparently, men are still men in Finland.
/r/MensRights18/09/19 03:49 PM
2

Which is self is part of the larger, post-modern war on truth, facts and reason. When reality is not on your side, deny reality. This has been the nature of the left for a long, long time. Philosophy has been corrupted since Plato, with a major wrong turn by the granddaddy of postmodernism, Immanuel Kant. The Frankfurt School simply applied this nonsense to various disciplines. For an overview of the wrong turns of philosophy, and how that has played out in various disciplines (economics, politi…
/r/MensRights18/09/19 03:39 PM
17

And Kyle is whiteknighting for the hope of a whiff of pussy. Possibly underage pussy. Even the Muffington Host has noticed the Star Trek <=> Pedo connection.
/r/MGTOW12/09/19 12:08 AM
2

Dave Chappelle on provocative clothing
/r/MensRights01/09/19 06:38 AM
6

Men avoiding women. But, they don't need no man, so what is the issue?
/r/MensRights01/09/19 06:34 AM
2

MGTOW will win! It's inevitable! What is there to be won? Just go your own way - there is nothing but your own life involved. MGTOW is a PERSONAL strategy. There is no wider contest to be won or lost! If you are a MGTOW as a political statement, then you are stupid.
/r/MGTOW19/08/19 11:24 PM
7

This Facebook ad is infuriating. Don't be on Facebook. Don't use anything from Google. Avoid Twitter. Use blockers to keep all three from tracking you on 3rd party sites.
/r/MGTOW18/08/19 07:10 PM
1

That won't be shown. They weren't into making art pornographic, or peeing in bottles and calling it art, or baking muffins using vaginal yeast. They hadn't sunk that far yet; only in modern times has it gotten that nutty.
/r/MGTOW18/08/19 07:08 PM
2

To say nothing of "better living through chemistry" - in this case, silicone.
/r/MGTOW18/08/19 07:05 PM
1

We can only hope for his sake, that he does not cry.
/r/MGTOW16/08/19 07:34 PM
1

You are welcome! Be aware that Rollo is a PUA, not a MGTOW. That doesn't mean his observations on female behavior are incorrect, however.
/r/MGTOW16/08/19 07:33 PM
2

America keeps trying to embrace this insanity of female leadership. Even the phrase "female leadership" makes no sense. Women I have seen wield authority do it like they are bossing around small children - disregard input, punish noncompliance or perceived noncompliance, lash out at subordinates failing to obey. This could work for a dictator, I suppose; not in a competence hierarchy. I have also never seen a woman groom her successor, or really do anything in the way of developing subordinates.…
/r/MGTOW16/08/19 07:32 PM
1

Guy kills parents and siblings mad at him for stealing $200K from them to pay for camgirl.
/r/MGTOW15/08/19 04:45 AM
3

Who fucking cares? Not here to figure out what women want.
/r/MGTOW15/08/19 04:43 AM
2

Yeah, Terrence Popp has a good video about female officers. In general, he is not in favor of women in the military - especially 11D officers (and strait-leg grunts as well).
/r/MGTOW15/08/19 04:33 AM
1

That was one of the worst red-pill realizations - that female relatives are still part of the "enemy camp".
/r/MGTOW15/08/19 04:31 AM
1

At some point, perhaps a de-foo is in order. Before such drastic measures, just do an internet search on "verbal self defense" and another on "holding frame". Also look at https://illimitablemen.com/2014/12/14/the-shit-test-encyclopedia/ With better verbal skills, you can pass the shit test, and put her in her place.
/r/MGTOW15/08/19 04:30 AM
3

Alpha male - feels no need to justify his actions Gamma male - feels a pressure to justify, rationalize, explain and get buy-in from others. Never justify. Never explain. Never seek acceptance. Be your own point of reference. From the above, you can see how the whole "holding frame" comes naturally to Alphas, because they aren't so worried about convincing anyone - on account of they know they're at the top. Gammas know they aren't - and sadly, that knowledge keeps them down!
/r/MGTOW15/08/19 04:26 AM
2

Yeah, "incel" is becoming a bit of a go-to insult these days.
/r/MGTOW15/08/19 04:23 AM
2

Yes. Oddly enough, single fathers have no problem raising daughters, but single mothers are completely unable to raise men (unless some third party intervenes and serves as a role model - but even then, discipline can become an issue.)
/r/MGTOW15/08/19 04:16 AM
1

Worry about that if and when it happens. And have a resume ready.
/r/MGTOW15/08/19 04:11 AM
1

she's trying to establish dominance. Read up on holding frame. Unless she is above you in the chain of command, she can't dominate you unless you let your frame slip.
/r/MGTOW15/08/19 04:10 AM
2

There are a couple posts ragging on Hemsworth for being a simp, turning a ho into a housewife, etc. I don't completely disagree. I will, however, point out that in his circles, her excess stands out a lot less. A huge chunk of Hollywood and the music industry are partying their asses off. Let's hear from that former doyen of MGTOW, Bill Burr: https://hooktube.com/watch?v=x0gaYyNk7QA&t=462s That's the relevant bit, but it's worth listening to the whole thing.
/r/MGTOW15/08/19 03:54 AM
1

Or perhaps she just fades from the scene, and only crops up on reruns of VH1's "Behind the Music" in the distant future ...
/r/MGTOW15/08/19 03:50 AM
1

According to https://youtube.com/watch?v=VhTgVX4Eq28 : Round 1: DeAndre Hopkins, Davante Adams, Odell Beckham Jr. Round 2: Michael Thomas, Julio Jones, Tyreek Hill, JuJu Smith-Schuster, Mike Evans, Keenan Allen, Antonio Brown Round 3: T Y Hilton, Adam Thielen, Brandin Cooks, Amari Cooper Round 4: Stefon Diggs, Robert Woods, Kenny Golladay, Tyler Boyd Rounds 5 - 11 Go watch the video
/r/MGTOW15/08/19 03:46 AM
2

Well, in the Costa Concordia sinking, men ignored the plight of women and pushed over/past/through them to get to the life boats.
/r/MGTOW15/08/19 03:40 AM
2

I remember when, in normal white-coller workplaces, you were free to hang the Rigid Tools calendar. They had some might fine gals! These days no business would even dream of giving out racy calendars! Women didn't just want into the workplace in the 1970's; they wanted demanded it be changed to suit their whims, as well.
/r/MGTOW15/08/19 03:39 AM
1

Maybe it's a menopause thing?
/r/MGTOW15/08/19 03:37 AM
1

Yes Look up the "dead bedrooms" subreddit.
/r/MGTOW15/08/19 03:36 AM
1

if you continue working out A friend of mine owns a gym. She tells me the most important factor in whether or not someone keeps coming to the gym and sticks with their program, is how close it is to their house. More than 10 min, and they will probably quit. On the way to/from work accounts for most exceptions, but that is much less effective. SO - with a home gym, it's pretty easy to get to the gym! Furthermore: It's always open when you want it You don't even need clean workout clothes The mus…
/r/MGTOW15/08/19 03:32 AM
1

You only need a few square feet for that. Most of the house is to impress her girlfriends.
/r/MGTOW15/08/19 03:27 AM
1

Then they complain about how hard the work to keep their useless tchotchkes dust free!
/r/MGTOW15/08/19 03:26 AM
3

How many died on 9/11 to box cutters? Don't forget the "trucks of peace" either. https://www.thoughtco.com/juan-corona-the-machete-murderer-973162 https://ijr.com/13-mass-killings-where-no-guns-were-involved/
/r/MGTOW14/08/19 08:12 PM
1

I think what we're both saying is "Don't be stupid with your money, Indeed.
/r/MGTOW08/08/19 10:23 PM
1

We need alternate examples. But not so much pictures of motorcycles and travel destinations. In fact, the whole "look what I can buy myself" might NOT be the most skillful advice. While it might serve as encouragement to break free, encouraging anyone who doesn't own a house free and clear to excessive consumption is no favor.
/r/MGTOW07/08/19 08:42 PM
4

It will be interesting to watch if the tide turns, but all these buffoons have left their words and deeds fully documented online.
/r/MGTOW07/08/19 08:27 PM
2

In the 80's, everyone involved would have been fired. Yeah. Look up Albert John "Chainsaw Al" Dunlap.
/r/MGTOW07/08/19 08:26 PM
1

FUCK GILLETTE But make sure you wear a condom. They're diseased.
/r/MGTOW07/08/19 08:25 PM
25

Be careful in the UK though - gun control hasn't gotten the job done, so there is now a crack-down on anything with a sharp edge. You can be arrested for having a Chef's Knife with you in public - I kid you not.
/r/MGTOW07/08/19 08:24 PM
1

Oddly enough, once white women get married, they become much more conservative.
/r/MGTOW07/08/19 08:07 PM
4

Impossible to understand It's all about feelings and emotions. Here, I'll let Jack Nicholson explain it.
/r/MGTOW07/08/19 07:59 PM
6

We don’t just talk about women here, but our hobbies, jobs, money, lifestyle, etc... That is his issue. This not being the earthporn subreddit, Attorney-on-FIRE correctly points out that random travel boasting does absolutely nothing to help men understand female nature, or develop quality life plans, or derive any other benefit really. But I guess it might be good for the ego of whoever posts it. What we SHOULD talk about here is the values and virtues of constructive hobbies. What we should NO…
/r/MGTOW07/08/19 07:55 PM
1

a damaging and false narrative If you don't understand a common figure of speech, that's on you.
/r/MGTOW07/08/19 03:40 PM
1

You mean in the USA? I have no idea what is going on in Europe, but the feminists there seem at least as shrill as the ones here. Give it time. As to the BRICs - Brazil, Russia, India, China, aka the regional powers - all but India seem to be much less afflicted by feminism. China should get it though, given the imbalance of many more men than women. As to the rest of the third world - agreed, they still have intact vestiges of "muh patriarchy".
/r/MGTOW07/08/19 03:36 PM
1

No, of course not. Nice ad-hominem!
/r/MGTOW06/08/19 05:27 AM
1

Exactly. Racism is so over-used that IDGAF any more if I get called that. Racist, homophobe, tranny-phobe, white supremacist (regardless of what my skin tone might be!), sexist, misogynist - all of these ad-hominems have lost their meaning, and thus their impact.
/r/MGTOW06/08/19 05:26 AM
1

Very amusing!
/r/MGTOW06/08/19 05:24 AM
1

It all depends on what you lead them to expect. If you made your intentions clear, then the tears should have no power. If you just sort of kept quiet when she said she is looking for a husband - well, that might be different. I am all for a man looking to his own interests - but not under false pretenses. That is immoral. The other thing about false pretenses ... do you wanna get #PoundMeToo'ed? Because false pretenses is how you get #PoundMeToo'ed.
/r/MGTOW06/08/19 05:24 AM
1

And, you often wind up with children who are not temperamentally suited to your family (even if they are of the same race).
/r/MGTOW06/08/19 05:14 AM
1

This. Spot on!
/r/MGTOW06/08/19 05:14 AM
1

What this guy does for the kid is noble No. There is no nobility in being a codependent enabler.
/r/MGTOW06/08/19 05:13 AM
1

No, I am the "not forgoing his own chance to breed by supporting some other man's child" one. As to your comment, let's see: False Dichotomy. Let Single mom and her children have a lower standard of living, is all. There are an infinite range of non-fatal outcomes that don't involve cucking up to support another man's posterity. Strawman. I did not say "let orphans die" or anything remotely similar. You make a dishonest strawman to attack, because that is easier than presenting a logical, reason…
/r/MGTOW06/08/19 05:11 AM
1

I'm all for helping one another. This is not "helping", it is taking on a burden which should belong to someone else.
/r/MGTOW04/08/19 06:01 PM
1

Well said. Very stoic!
/r/MGTOW04/08/19 01:33 AM
1

Except that "companionship" and "connection" to a modern woman is pretty much impossible. If you do get it ... know it is fleeting. Hypergamy is real.
/r/MGTOW04/08/19 01:32 AM
1

I would give everything to be virgin again. With no hymen to pop, this makes no difference for a man - other than, he knows what sex with a woman is like in the case of one particular woman. (Trust me, they vary quite a bit - more for how they act than anything physical per se.) Being a virgin won't make you worth more, won't make you "the most powerful man in history" or even give you any power at all.
/r/MGTOW04/08/19 01:31 AM
18

Single mothers: Have a proven track record of poor judgement Have offspring they will love more than they ever love you Can force you to pay child support when you split (in some states/some instances) Are not good mothers (or they would be married) Are a form of cuckolding, as you are helping raise another man's child instead of your own
/r/MGTOW04/08/19 01:26 AM
33

They probably all paid, except for the guys who had vasectomies.
/r/MGTOW31/07/19 09:21 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter