TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

J2501 Archive

View 69 posts and 715 comments by J2501 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
146

GeneralJ2501/r/MensRights13/11/17 05:32 PM
106

J2501/r/MGTOW10/04/18 04:04 PM
75

Rant/VentingJ2501/r/TheRedPill30/11/15 03:51 PM
47

Red Pill TheoryJ2501/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 03:37 PM
39

Social IssuesJ2501/r/MensRights04/09/15 04:35 PM
38

DiscussionJ2501/r/MensRights12/09/14 06:10 PM
34

Raising AwarenessJ2501/r/MensRights07/01/15 03:54 AM
33

J2501/r/MGTOW12/05/18 10:41 PM
28

J2501/r/MGTOW07/01/15 04:50 AM
26

Ask Red PillJ2501/r/TheRedPill14/05/13 08:08 PM
25

J2501/r/MGTOW09/08/17 12:25 AM
20

J2501/r/MGTOW19/11/14 03:54 PM
20

J2501/r/MensRights03/06/14 02:49 PM
20

J2501/r/MGTOW29/04/18 08:20 PM
16

J2501/r/MGTOW07/04/17 04:42 PM
15

J2501/r/MGTOW06/02/15 09:51 PM
12

Blue Pill ExampleJ2501/r/TheRedPill14/09/14 06:15 PM
12

Blue Pill ExampleJ2501/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 04:40 AM
12

Red Pill TheoryJ2501/r/TheRedPill04/12/14 10:46 PM
11

J2501/r/MGTOW21/11/16 08:21 PM
11

J2501/r/MGTOW06/04/19 05:18 PM
10

J2501/r/MGTOW20/08/15 07:58 PM
10

Rant/VentingJ2501/r/TheRedPill16/10/14 11:40 PM
10

MetaJ2501/r/TheRedPill15/10/13 09:57 PM
9

OpinionJ2501/r/MensRights24/03/15 05:57 PM
9

BlogJ2501/r/MGTOW15/12/15 05:34 PM
8

J2501/r/MGTOW07/01/15 04:49 AM
7

Social IssuesJ2501/r/MensRights15/12/15 05:33 PM
7

J2501/r/MGTOW29/04/18 06:41 PM
6

Edu./Occu.J2501/r/MensRights09/08/17 12:07 AM
6

J2501/r/TheRedPill16/12/14 09:12 PM
5

J2501/r/MensRights20/10/16 06:24 PM
5

J2501/r/MensRights22/07/13 03:04 AM
5

J2501/r/MensRights10/04/18 04:02 PM
5

J2501/r/MensRights10/04/18 03:58 PM
5

DiscussionJ2501/r/MensRights13/10/14 03:41 PM
5

J2501/r/MGTOW20/10/16 06:23 PM
5

GeneralJ2501/r/MensRights22/05/20 02:19 AM
5

J2501/r/MensRights12/09/13 05:37 PM
4

J2501/r/MGTOW18/11/14 08:19 PM
4

J2501/r/MGTOW13/11/17 04:25 PM
4

Men's RightsJ2501/r/TheRedPill03/06/14 04:18 PM
3

J2501/r/MensRights06/02/15 09:52 PM
3

Men's RightsJ2501/r/TheRedPill10/10/13 05:14 PM
3

J2501/r/MGTOW22/11/14 01:35 AM
2

OpinionJ2501/r/MensRights13/04/15 12:20 AM
2

OpinionJ2501/r/MensRights12/04/15 06:37 PM
1

J2501/r/MensRights16/10/13 01:15 AM
1

J2501/r/TheRedPill15/05/13 05:17 PM
1

MetaJ2501/r/TheRedPill10/05/14 01:04 PM
1

Rant/VentingJ2501/r/TheRedPill27/10/14 02:38 PM
1

Edu./Occu.J2501/r/MensRights16/11/15 07:25 PM
1

J2501/r/MGTOW29/04/18 04:10 PM
0

Marriage/DivorceJ2501/r/MensRights08/09/15 04:39 PM
0

Rant/VentingJ2501/r/TheRedPill29/10/14 10:47 AM
0

MetaJ2501/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 12:59 PM
0

J2501/r/MensRights16/08/13 08:34 PM
0

Red Pill TheoryJ2501/r/TheRedPill16/12/14 07:08 PM
0

StoryJ2501/r/MensRights27/03/15 05:57 PM
0

Red Pill TheoryJ2501/r/TheRedPill22/11/14 01:14 AM
0

J2501/r/MensRights10/10/13 05:15 PM
0

J2501/r/MGTOW21/01/15 08:54 PM
0

MetaJ2501/r/TheRedPill15/09/14 06:14 PM
0

Social IssuesJ2501/r/MensRights12/11/17 08:42 PM
0

MetaJ2501/r/TheRedPill08/10/13 08:59 AM
0

MetaJ2501/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 09:08 PM
0

Men's RightsJ2501/r/TheRedPill07/01/15 04:02 AM
0

J2501/r/TheRedPill29/04/13 10:38 PM
0

J2501/r/MGTOW16/11/15 08:05 PM
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
3

I think with regards to MRA stuff, the left/right paradigm is competent evil vs incompetent benevolence. In that order.
/r/MensRights27/04/26 11:16 PM
2

I've become more thoughtful in my messaging, often composing a draft, then pulling back, rewording it less overtly, etc. I'm 100% positive they think I'm using chat-gpt. more projection. I pride myself in writing ability, and would never use a bot for personal communications. I mostly use AI for advice on how to communicate with computers, and to do typing I'd rather not do myself.
/r/MensRights07/07/25 05:22 PM
2

I also lived in a college town, during the first part of my career after graduating, watched many young people graduate, come and go, and eventually I wanted to go somewhere else, for adults.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 04:35 PM
2

I have known the type. A lot of that is red flag, for me, now.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 02:23 PM
2

I'd just be proactive about people talking behind your back, about any kind of 'privileged' status, because they're basically painting a giant target on you, for the socialists, and you might not deserve to be 'equalized'. They'll keep on doing that to you until you're way beneath them, then switch tactics, like you aren't good enough. Seen it many times. It's practically in their handbook.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 02:06 PM
2

Yeah, I'd nip that in the bud, if I were you, because that can get into some really serious defamation. Soon she'll be accusing you of having a higher body count than you actually have. That's false accounting, and the motive is to make you look more accommodated than you actually are. Like Stalin starved the Ukraine. Very common, with those people.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 12:58 PM
13

A man with moral fiber is less exploitable.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 06:35 AM
2

Ugh, to the chick trying to play class warfare on you. My first ex did the same shit, then the second she got money to go along with her social privilege, her story changed to be about how low class I am. A classist is a classist, in any context.
/r/MensRights01/07/25 06:19 AM
6

That's what I call 'The Robin Williams response'. You're describing something specific, possibly unique to your times, or unstereotypical, in some way, and they simply distill it, to an obsolete axiom, while chuckling smugly, insulated from fracas.
/r/MensRights05/05/25 12:43 PM
6

Problem is: you point out the breakdown of society to some Boomer pundits, and they chuckle and say 'War of the sexes. Been going on forever.' And they think they understand the current state of it, and are champions for justice.
/r/MensRights05/05/25 12:37 PM
5

Not only that, such practices proliferate terrible, over-enabled women.
/r/MensRights01/05/25 10:00 PM
1

The fact that territorialism is commonly thought as a typically male trait is actually a good example of how entrenched their propaganda machine is in our media and culture. They are extremely crafty at being worse perpetrators, and setting others up to look guilty. I can say the same about infidelity. The more exes you get, even after they've moved on, none of them want you to be with anyone better-suited or prettier than them. Then they would become a bad historical example of a mediocre lover…
/r/MensRights16/04/25 03:23 PM
2

In a lot of ways, 'pick me' can be applied to men and women. JS You'll understand when a woman you find completely unattractive thinks she can win you over with her personality, when she has almost nothing you want, and a bunch of stuff you don't, in that regard. A lot of women are so brainwashed to think sexual history doesn't matter, they don't think it is or should be a problem. That comes from a deep-seated sense of entitlement to emotionally gaslight us, in an attempt to re-write our priori…
/r/MensRights16/04/25 02:56 PM
2

Getting to know a woman's personality should really dispel most infatuations. She may be what you want physically, but can you tolerate her drama, in your life? Once you've been through it a few times, and stop idealizing women and relationships conceptually, you won't want most of them that close to you.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 02:28 PM
3

What you should expect from any romantic competition these days is projection, virtue-signalling, betrayal, abuse of confidence, and sabotage. That's the 'pick me' culture. I just recommend introducing yourself to women, but not immediately taking it to that level. No, hang back. You should judge them. You're being egalitarian in even letting them know you exist, considering their tendency for inference and unlitigated slander.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 02:14 PM
3

Yeah, and a lot of them are simply territorial bulldykes. Those tend to be some of the most histrionic personality disasters ever. Do you want them to win the hearts of maidens fair?
/r/MensRights16/04/25 01:57 PM
5

Play by office rules. You can ask them once. If they say no, drop it, and that should be no harm, no foul. It's awkward, but at least you made an attempt, and don't have to wonder. I can't express to you enough the importance of asking women out, especially when you're young and attractive. Because they're probably just intimidated. Don't let social anxiety destroy the best years of your life.
/r/MensRights16/04/25 11:00 AM
6

'I am but a Golem, made of witches' clay, All the thoughts within my head are things those witches say.' 'Of Witch'
/r/MensRights16/04/25 10:54 AM
4

I'm straight, but find males to be much better friends than females. And not because of tension from me. I'm genuinely sexually uninterested in 99.9% of females. I feel like that's normal. There's calendar women, then there's homely chicks we don't want holding us down. Once you've paid the opportunity cost of compromise or desperation, you should learn better. Frankly, it's difficult to be friends with over-entitled hypocrites, of any gender, to say nothing of the female neuroticism, insecurity…
/r/MensRights12/04/25 09:51 AM
1

Does she really want 'neglect', as an excuse for sex crime, to be normalized, across genders? What a complete lack of self-awareness.
/r/MensRights11/04/25 07:08 AM
5

Why do skinny men marry overweight women? Why do smart men marry stupid women? Why are the body counts of wives often higher than their husbands'? Female hypergamy, and deprivation of males.
/r/MensRights04/04/25 09:30 AM
1

Transference is the province of the repressed. It often takes the form of treating someone poorly because someone else who looks like them treated you poorly before that, or treating someone exceptionally well, because they remind you of someone you've done wrong. Whether of positive or negative effects to you, transference is usually not social justice. It simply helps the unjust feel and look better, to the people around them, they have to keep happy, in order to socially survive.
/r/MensRights23/02/25 04:02 PM
3

Psychologists call that transference, and if you familiarize yourself with that concept, and keep an eye out, you'll find women and people in general do that, in many ways, often.
/r/MensRights21/02/25 07:28 PM
1

You also got a watch out for the ones who are 'past all that', and attempt to give off the appearance of compliance. It's fake, over the top, and should be easy to spot. No telling how they are, when you aren't around, or when their reconditioning snaps. Plus their past nastification.
/r/MensRights13/02/25 02:17 PM
1

Whether they're 'liberals' trying to poison you, with hypocritical financial classism, projections of their own deficiencies onto you, egotistical bragging about nasty shit, or simply a toxic, feminist bias, to me that's all from insecurity about their self-worth. Part of them knows their position in life is stilted, from sexism. No matter what position they maneuver themselves into, or what they acquire, they still feel dirty, because they are. And it warps them, obviously. As does being over-e…
/r/MensRights13/02/25 01:37 PM
2

I think I'm a lot more likely to reject a woman at conversational stage, for psychological tendencies that come with being slutty, or demanding of compensation. Usually, sluts and whores don't have much consistency in their ideology, or reasonability, in their expectations of others. Hear all that, and leave the meat curtains a mystery. One less genital nightmare you had to see, disease to which you were exposed, or social obligation you assumed.
/r/MensRights13/02/25 10:31 AM
2

Would you believe any number they told you? That's another thing. Creating a lot of drama, only to be tendered lies, probably. Go with your instinct.
/r/MensRights13/02/25 10:08 AM
1

Frankly, I don't try to quantify by asking. If a woman strikes me as skanky, I keep her at a distance. They'll usually do that within a few minutes of conversation by saying something they are too stupid to recognize as sexism, or they just look used. An innocent disposition is easy to identify, and so is a fresh look. Why spoil the mood by asking about numbers?
/r/MensRights13/02/25 10:06 AM
2

Women get mock shocked, as if raised in a value system where 'that isn't important', hence 'that shouldn't be important to you'. Telling you how to feel. Trying to set your priorities for you. Gaslighting you emotionally. Typical NPD behaviors.
/r/MensRights13/02/25 10:02 AM
-2

Think about the mechanics of our respective genitalias. When a man gets aroused, it doesn't necessarily make a mess of his expensive clothing. That's one of the reasons women sexually repress themselves. Materialistic priorities. Plus there's likely financial rewards to being perceived as selectively prudent, hence most cunts are pretentious
/r/MensRights03/02/25 09:56 AM
1

I can probably predict what's next, on her slippery slope of malpractice: after one or more failures, she starts blaming your taste and judgement, and tells you to lower your standards, or go after boring, uncultured mismatches, in the name of 'stability', when in fact, the unsatisfying nature of such compromises will be anything but stable, for either involved party. The cure isn't as profitable as the treatment.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 09:37 AM
1

A female shrink seems to be teaching you desperation, and proceeding forth on bent knee. That doesn't benefit you. It benefits women. It will likely result in you being financially drained and emotionally scarred, by many failed courtships. And she expects you to keep paying her, to 'help you' get over every ill-advised one. Think about how Gandhi resisted British suppression. He exposed their lack of conscience, and refused to take part in their unethical products and practices. Will that work,…
/r/MensRights21/11/24 09:24 AM
2

Bonus points if you can get them to exhibit their sadism, by making them laugh at your comparative social disadvantages. Expose their fake liberalism, to themselves, and those around them.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 08:27 AM
1

You should end by saying 'I don't want to enable you, any more than other people already have,' then leave they ass on the curb. Social justice is what they ordered.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 08:19 AM
2

Ask them the simple question 'What's the longest you've ever been alone, in your adult life?' Probably not long enough, compared to you. 'How many sexual partners have you had?' Probably too many, compared to you. 'How often are you personally, specifically invited (not counting promotions for events that charge admission) to social events, or on dates?' Probably, a lot more often than you. 'Have you gained or lost, via relationships?' And so on... Point is, they are likely more privileged via i…
/r/MensRights21/11/24 07:21 AM
2

When you're dealing with people who are systematically over-privileged, compared to yourself, fairness to you is not possible.
/r/MensRights21/11/24 05:53 AM
1

I've started telling women I want a woman who is age appropriate and a similar level of sexual experience with an equal or fewer number of partners, as well as comparable height to weight ratio, similar interests, etc. Just to confound them. Because a female version of me probably isn't very easy to find, due to the general differences in the way our genders are treated. I want them to acknowledge the fact that, by way of a massive social privilege gap between us, very few among them possess the…
/r/MensRights21/11/24 05:12 AM
2

Systematically shut down the entire economy by force, create money from thin air and distribute it disproportionately, then have to raise interest to combat inflation, and finally: blame the victims. That might actually be worse than bootstrapping advice.
/r/MensRights13/11/24 06:07 PM
1

Women care more about themselves than the men they make poor, IME.
/r/MensRights08/11/24 03:47 AM
18

It's one of many reasons I've never legally or ceremonially married. Imagine being chained to someone who won't fuck you, and extricating yourself being that costly.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 08:28 PM
66

Also goes to show you what their go-to power is. They often can't think of any other leverage to apply. That's what simple, biologically mechanistic creatures they are.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 06:11 PM
6

They say the problem with socialism is they eventually run out of other people's money. They also end up boycotting everything and everyone, to a point where deprivation becomes taken for granted, and hence is ineffective, as a petty threat.
/r/MensRights07/11/24 06:10 PM
50

Oh noes, they're threatening to stop banging them other dudes!
/r/MensRights07/11/24 06:05 PM
3

and this shit's been going on since at least... 1994 'Watch a fading nation crawl'
/r/MensRights24/10/24 07:03 PM
8

Blame a redistributive, 'progressive' agenda, to 'create a level playing field', where everyone would rather sit in the air conditioning, on a computer, than do that kind of work. We figure that's for people who say 'school is bullshit'. Or people who never read, can't do anything else. It's not for people who've been blacklisted, in spite of our talents and skills. They can put some people ahead, but they can't make some people go back. Blame the homogenized, spin-cycle of this shithole country…
/r/MensRights24/10/24 06:59 PM
1

Henry Rollins.
/r/MensRights29/08/24 09:28 PM
6

Who gives a shit what she would do? Who gives a shit about her? You. Because she made you. Stop.
/r/MensRights25/08/24 10:13 AM
3

I'll give you the same advice I'd give someone who has been griefed in an online game: don't focus on revenge, but simply extricate yourself from the situation, and move on. Revenge is a waste of your energy, and could likely lead to consequences. She already seems like she's enticed, entrapped, and provoked you. You're playing into her hands. Let it go, dude. There's like 5 billion women on the planet.
/r/MensRights25/08/24 09:16 AM
1

Also, women are cowards in that they would rather talk to anyone but you about you. They will likely be fed misinformation, and believe it, because they think being indirect is clever, and avoid direct confrontation at all costs.
/r/MensRights21/08/24 08:35 AM
5

Merely another example of a mask worn for purpose. How many men have been told their dick hurt a woman, or was 'too much'? There's big and small variations of all genitalia. Big things don't fit in small things. They know that. We know that. Point is: they're being two-faced about it, in a deliberate attempt to make an emotional response overpower a rational one.
/r/MensRights09/08/24 05:47 PM
3

Taking initiative, assertiveness, and bravery, are mostly characterized as masculine traits, and most women expect men to be those things on their behalf. Simply not wanting to take the risks they want you to take for them, will leave you alone.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 11:15 PM
3

More likely an introverted man is going to be sexless, regardless of his looks, because of gender roles, and women being chickenshit, especially around attractive men.
/r/MensRights08/08/24 11:10 PM
1

Age-appropriate equivalent, and fulfillment of my expansive tastes, are probably two different things, but I haven't found either out there.
/r/MensRights27/07/24 05:22 PM
1

There are plenty of people out there, thriving on false equivalency. That's what my first relationship in high school was. We were said to be kismet, merely because we looked a bit similar. Most young people look similar. And I was said to have initiated it, when in fact, I was baited and lured. I don't fall for that same shit anymore. Most women set off my red flags. I don't need any more emotional trauma, in my life. Literally not one second more.
/r/MensRights27/07/24 05:18 PM
1

There's a lot of poorly-aged, ignorant, evil, promiscuous, and out-of-shape people out there. A fair deal, notsomuch. Having a place to make noise by myself is good, though.
/r/MensRights27/07/24 05:01 PM
1

I'm just happy I have my own place, and resent the constant attempt to take me down a peg, and make me accept lesser.
/r/MensRights27/07/24 04:22 PM
3

Which is why, when a man just wants the company, and doesn't expect the other person to pay, he adds: 'My treat.'
/r/MensRights22/07/24 01:04 AM
2

As a man, if anyone ever asked me to a meal or show, I'd at least half-expect to pay, and wouldn't accept, if I couldn't afford it. As a man.
/r/MensRights22/07/24 01:00 AM
3

And they project it onto others, often. I deal with narcissistic assumptions from them, sometimes, and it's annoying, like I can tell they read a rubric, and they're grasping at straws to apply it to me. That's what happens when everyone is a pop psychologist. I have a degree in psych, and don't put much stock in it.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 06:30 PM
5

It's the same as when they say 'don't judge others by _____, then you won't be judged on that basis.' But you will. Point is: fat, unattractive liberals want to drag you down with them, and sully you, with their stank. They want you to forget about anyone cleaner or better looking. They want you to give up on beauty, commitment, and monogamy, conceptually. They use 'freedom' and 'open-mindedness' to talk you into the quicksand of their degrading community.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 07:19 AM
8

Half of them do that, and the other half say 'don't turn everything into a competition', and 'don't compare yourself to others', in deliberate obliviousness to all the women who do exactly that.
/r/MensRights16/07/24 06:47 AM
18

Yeah, and any time I suggested something to improve her, it was considered abuse, but I contend she tendered me a lot of toxic support. She didn't suggest I work out, or work on my hair. She made me feel like she accepted my flaws, and always would. Until one day, I was left with only the criticism of my community.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 03:48 PM
65

All I know is when my ex compared her fidelity to mine, it was: 'You sometimes look at naked ladies on the internet, and there are women at your job you confide in,' and that was somehow the same as her driving four hours to have sex with other men, and having sex with other men, in my home, while I was working to pay for it.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 01:21 PM
1

Agreed, and I was gonna say, 'I hope one of those daughters bears him a grandson,' but that kid will be quite privileged, and they will not understand the average male's struggle that way.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 01:19 PM
2

Death duels between slave owners, oppressive? No way!
/r/MensRights09/07/24 07:43 AM
6

You should not have signed. There was likely some evidence exonerating you. You had no wounds. There was likely a halo camera recording nearby. Neither your own cellphone nor hers recorded a scuffle between you that did not happen. She has likely lied before, or has some criminal record that would cast doubt on her testimony. Being stigmatized as low class is almost as bad as being in prison. Now you know that, at least.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 07:31 AM
2

Obama never had to raise a son. Never had to worry about marrying a son off, or making a son successful. Or teach a son good judgment about socializing. Frankly I'd much rather raise a daughter. Teach her diet and exercise, then wait for Prince Charming to take her off my hands. Or some corporate initiative to give her a lazy girl job. Plenty of earmarks and scholarships for her. Easy peasy.
/r/MensRights09/07/24 03:43 AM
0

In the same sense I did not have Barbie dolls, I didn't see the Barbie movie.
/r/MensRights07/07/24 01:02 AM
1

Not an angle but an observation: the outspoken male feminist is often a rapist.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 08:26 PM
1

Not an angle but an observation: the outspoken male feminist is often a rapist.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 07:42 PM
3

Can't tell if his feminism is insecure projection from a guilty douchebag, or the legal ordeal is false-accusers going after targets for whatever motive.
/r/MensRights06/07/24 02:19 AM
7

I have no problem with ze government shifting the demographic of the people who die in the desert, or wherever, so everyone else can have cheap gasoline. Yay, 'equality'!
/r/MensRights15/06/24 04:12 AM
1

I still say the best response is simply: 'I refuse to choose anyone resembling a bear.'
/r/MensRights14/06/24 06:30 PM
2

Virtue-signalling works on the stupid women those guys are trying to impress. Sad some people's relationships are based on manipulating eachother, via ideological pandering.
/r/MensRights11/06/24 08:01 AM
29

If a woman is avoidant or hesitant, I simply figure I shouldn't waste my time, or bother them. There's all kinds of body language and encouraging signals that would have to be there, to entice me. Unfortunately, some women throw those falsely, for petty material gains.
/r/MensRights09/06/24 09:15 AM
1

In the vacuum of the contemporary absence of religious shaming, women will resort to the same kind of shaming they have always railed against, with no self-awareness, whatsoever.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 12:27 PM
44

Most women don't acknowledge a woman could invade a man's home, and slowly cannibalize him to death.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 12:23 PM
1

As much as getting rejected hurts, personally, every failed attempt also carries a reputation. Being thought of as naive or uninterested is probably better than being thought of as desperate or too forward. If you care at all what others think, and try to balance that with fulfilling your own desires.
/r/MensRights07/06/24 01:02 AM
1

I simply take the opposite stance. I don't like bears, and refuse to share a living space with a woman who looks like a bear. Which is most of them. They look like rotund, brown bears.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 10:02 AM
-2

Get really good at guitar, like Yngwie Malmsteen.
/r/MensRights05/06/24 09:34 AM
0

Some will tell you a woman can't relate to your problems, and that may be true, but your case might have more of an impact on her, if you are truly open and honest to her about your suffering, the impediment it has caused, and how uncaring and unwilling society is, to accommodate your afflictions. But if you want better treatment, yeah, go to a man.
/r/MensRights02/06/24 02:30 PM
1

Alpha galactose
/r/MensRights02/06/24 12:55 PM
1

There is also intellectual and creative class, to consider. Any difference in those is going to be a point of contention, the whole superficial relationship. I think those things should line up, but can differ between couples according to individual values. Often you see smart men who make good money with stupid women, who are beautiful. That might work for everyone involved, if they have what eachother values. He'll likely get annoyed, and people will call it a sexist relationship, because it i…
/r/MensRights25/05/24 02:44 PM
5

I think a big problem, honestly, is that financial 'equalization', between genders, along with female hypergamy, has taken people in the same looks class out of eachother's financial class, and likely, her financial expectations. So you end up with people who are physically compatible, but artificial bullshit like class, status, and money, is keeping us apart. Most women want to marry up, so they expect men to marry down. Problem is, some of us are really not cool with marrying someone poorer an…
/r/MensRights25/05/24 01:02 PM
1

Some say sentiment runs out quickly, when you're aiming too high, and only getting teased. But aiming too low will run your sentiment out quickly, also.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 12:54 PM
0

You definitely have to pick your spots, or your sentiment will run out quickly. Think statistically. There's billions of women. You couldn't meet them all in one lifetime. Most of them are for someone else, anyway. Leave the mediocre on the table for the mediocre, and only make moves if your heart is in it.
/r/MensRights25/05/24 12:19 PM
15

Women have always molested children, by way of considering children their property they've intimately carried, and by way of being most attracted to naive people they can easily manipulate.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 05:04 PM
3

I think most would agree, in an ideal world, naive boys don't lose their virginity to skanks, but that's almost always what happens. They say it's because young men are more eager than young women, but you can't ignore all the psychological warfare these days, in the form of 'incel' shaming. Think about what that drives young men to, and who's interest all that is really in.
/r/MensRights12/05/24 01:39 AM
0

Put the papers in a box from Jared, to give her a sense of your disappointment.
/r/MensRights05/05/24 07:43 PM
1

Seriously, if it came down to: either accept Koko the gorilla, your new 'roommate', or default on a mortgage, I'd be moving to Portland, with a tent.
/r/MensRights03/05/24 09:33 PM
2

The only thing that angers me is why the bear thing isn't applied to a 300 lb woman with a 120 lb male. There are scenarios in which we could feel smothered, crushed, misappropriated from, imprisoned, enslaved, and a lot of us aren't into that shit, either. But we're often expected to marry down, so women can marry up. However long we've been alone is held against us, is said to make us lose value, and the assumption is that starving us, collectively, deliberately, will make us desperate enough …
/r/MensRights03/05/24 09:18 PM
3

They call it 'growing up', and you 'immature'. All part of the tactic of using you to pay for their needless psycho-babies.
/r/MensRights28/04/24 03:41 PM
2

Sounds like a pig feels entitled to you pounding her for practice.
/r/MensRights22/04/24 02:05 PM
12

Douchebag male feminism. They want more women at the show. Whether it's admission prices or a plus one list, it's always at our expense. What else do you expect from EDM DJs? They're mostly pseudoliberal, fascist douchebags.
/r/MensRights11/04/24 08:53 PM
5

It reminded me of the Monty Python scene where they're having tea on a battlefield.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 08:04 AM
15

Believe it or not, all of that was done to me. I was forced to attend Cottilion at a country club, and shit like that. Obviously I considered it absurd, and quickly rejected the notion. Grooming fail.
/r/MensRights04/04/24 06:52 AM
2

A woman feels like a loser soon after she loses her virginity, and that nigga gone, off banging her friends, now. Then she gets insecure, and starts calling everyone else a loser.
/r/MensRights21/03/24 03:26 PM
7

Hardly the face who launched a thousand ships.
/r/MensRights20/03/24 04:05 AM
20

If you count abortion: same old same old; women killing children.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 11:53 PM
1

Simply put: tie, flowers, and 'I want to marry you and father your children,' is simply too much up front, for most women. Even with a budget for nice restaurants, it's a Pepe Lepew vibe. I can speak to having gotten sex, without any of that, and the experience was far less contrived. Like my college professor once said: 'People don't date and go steady any more, they hang out and hook up.'
/r/MensRights18/03/24 08:33 PM
64

Some of the comments are a bit harsh, but then again, four kids are dead. But women kill children all the time. That's common.
/r/MensRights18/03/24 07:59 PM
1

Seems to me like people looking for dates are likely to be exploited, or their formal intentions mocked, and the best relationships come out of stumbling into spending time with women one-on-one, and only post hoc admitting interest. There's a lot of stigma and speculation attached to any time you spend with women, especially away from communal scrutiny or awareness. Imagine the 'dangerous situation' lectures she's gotten, and is ignoring, for you. There may be totally innocent or professional i…
/r/MensRights18/03/24 07:42 PM
1

They don't want their human sex dolls to get bike legs, so you have to work their share.
/r/MensRights13/03/24 11:42 PM
1

Hyper-competitiveness is yet another projection they attribute to 'toxic masculinity', when in fact, women have always benefitted from and manipulatively spurred on competition between males. When males compete over women, the only beneficiary is the prize.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 09:23 AM
2

Take a page from the book of contemporary women, and stop loving the abusive (and exploitative). Learn to properly identify those behaviors, and deliberately avoid them. Do not get so codependent with anyone, to a point where you think you have to put up with that shit.
/r/MensRights12/03/24 08:52 AM
3

It's as if there is some scheme to defraud men of our wealth, and redistribute it.
/r/MensRights22/02/24 01:49 PM
1

American women are slave-driving fascists, who base their entire self-worth on controlling other people. It becomes more difficult as they get older, and their pull no longer matches their sense of entitlement.
/r/MensRights19/02/24 07:37 AM
1

Too much androgen.
/r/MensRights15/02/24 02:14 AM
24

'It's always men's fault that women are ugly perverts.'
/r/MensRights14/02/24 04:03 PM
3

IME, the kind of women of whom you speak are equally as likely to lie about it, or act like they don't have problems keeping the men they allow to use them. Whether they are chaste or promiscuous, they'll try to paint that as a virtue. But whether a man is chaste or promiscuous, they'll paint it as a fault. Women are selfish, tyrannical, hypocritical, awful excuses for human beings. Even if they tried to be good people, they'd fail miserably.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 07:21 AM
3

Anyone who participates in any kind of online communication should bloody well know it could all be rigged. You are sending messages in bottles, through a medium you probably don't fully understand. DO NOT, I repeat DO NOT let an app convince you the options it presents to you are legitimate, genuine, authentic, the full and complete set, or anything close to what you would have to settle for, if you simply went out more, and tried to make friends, in real life.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 02:54 AM
3

Most of us have been severely damaged by idiotic male hierarchies. Like the military.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 01:20 AM
1

So you're doubting things I know I've felt. No offense, but you're gaslighting me.
/r/MensRights13/02/24 01:17 AM
1

If you ask me, people like that drive you to create a scene, in some bizarre attempt at entrapment, incitement, or enticement, and it attracts way too much attention. Whatever you're supposed to do in that situation, it might likely backfire, on you, or them. Then they act like you put the heat on them. Insanity to even think about. I've learned to just stay out of it. They get mad at me for commenting but if you ask me, them folk drive people to talk about them. It's what they want. Notoriety, …
/r/MensRights11/02/24 08:19 AM
1

Some people are simply horrid, reeking cunts, and they won't stop, ever, until they are dead. Who wants to live an entire life, trodden upon, by such corrosive corruptors?
/r/MensRights11/02/24 08:02 AM
1

I understand turn the other cheek, but you can turn the other cheek so much with some people, cheeks gettin raw and bloody. You can do that, but I won't, sucka.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 07:55 AM
1

Because I've honestly been made to feel, by past experiences, which may be somewhat unique to me, that simply by going out, and trying to make new friends, I could inadvertently start a gang war. Or someone gets busted, because of whoever might be following me. Even just trying to have a decent job, it's really rough sometimes. It's a fucking jungle out there.
/r/MensRights11/02/24 06:06 AM
1

And yeah, entitlement, expectations, butthurt, blah blah blah, I get it. I have gotten that, for awhile. But there was more to it than that, in that I have rolled with some seriously bad bitches before, as in criminal psychopaths, and not particularly good-natured ones. They could act like good people, and I was attracted to their power, but found it easy to fall out of favor with unreasonable people, and wind up on their bad side. These days, I'm more inclined not to get involved with or attach…
/r/MensRights11/02/24 05:58 AM
7

I must admit, in the distant past, the thought crossed my mind, not only because of the pain my obsession with some people caused me, but because of their continued, deliberate, interference in my life. The perception they were blocking me from any social progress, even with others. The feeling, caused by one or both of us, that it was them, or me. After a certain point, I was no longer enamoured with them, and simply wanted them out of my way. I wanted my freedom from them, from any exploitativ…
/r/MensRights11/02/24 05:30 AM
3

I don't recommend the loss of anyone's virginity to such a business. Spiritually, that could entail karmic bondage on either side. Or emotional bondage, on either side. Desensitization, on either side. Collectivization and homogenization. Psychic damage, basically. I've met a lot of smart people, and it seems to me the ones with the clearest heads, whose focus I most admire, are in healthy marriages based on trustworthiness, not liasons with charlatans, which keep us worried, overburdened with p…
/r/MensRights10/02/24 08:06 PM
1

I said 'Yeah, I agree we should get rid of all the bad things and people in the world, as long as everyone agree on what good and bad are.'
/r/MensRights10/02/24 05:17 PM
1

So, egotistical or ideological manipulation.
/r/MensRights10/02/24 05:13 PM
2

But basically: I didn't like it, but didn't punch him, sue the guy, try to have him arrested, or even try to find out who he was. It's simply something that happens in clubs, sometimes. Like suggestive dancing, or bumping into eachother. Yeah, there's boundaries of good taste, but it's a party.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 11:27 PM
0

But only if it was explicitly unwanted and repeated were those claims fruitful, probably. For the record, I'm not gay, but once, at a nightclub, I was in a dancing circle, and a man approached me, kissed me, and told me I was beautiful. I could feel his stubble on my cheek. I retreated from the club to back home, and was a little freaked out, but I don't blame the guy too much for trying, and frankly, it was a bit flattering. He was the first human being to tell me that, in awhile, at that point…
/r/MensRights09/02/24 11:23 PM
-8

First of all let me say that I wouldn't presume the willingness and readiness of anyone, even someone with whom I'd lived, for awhile. But there's all kinds of touch that most dating coaches would recommend, which isn't groping, but is somewhat suggestive. The brush down the spine. The caress of a cheek. The taking of her hand, and leading her on a romantic adventure. Could be they aren't willing until you do some stuff like that. On the other hand, she might shit you down real quick, and you sh…
/r/MensRights09/02/24 10:58 PM
-17

You know what? I missed that word (unwilling) in the title. But I do feel my point still stands a little bit. Someone who isn't always instantly willing (so presumably, anyone) might be persuaded a little, by touch. It isn't harassment, until it is expressly unwanted.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 10:37 PM
-25

Would if...? I think if they had a pre-established physical relationship with him, that might be OK, if he didn't resist too much. Same as we do, when we're feeling a bit randy, because she's looking really hot. That could be enjoyable for any gender. You wouldn't want to have that whole consent conversation again, every time, would you? Or if, she gives you a look, and pushes you away, you'd know she has a 'headache', and back off, maybe go into the other room, and play some video games. Right?
/r/MensRights09/02/24 10:17 PM
1

I also wouldn't want to relapse on certain kinds of touch, and emotional attachments, because I wouldn't want to go through withdrawals.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 09:46 PM
6

I'm happy without touch from anyone , and would only value it, from some people. I got over longing to touch others, long ago. The older you get, the more that becomes a 'take it or leave it' matter. As in: With some women, I could be directed either way, and not be too upset. With most women, and men, I'm flat-out grateful they're not touching me, because I wouldn't want to touch them, either. I wouldn't want to get zapped by their energy, incur their bad karma, or have it go down in history we…
/r/MensRights09/02/24 09:10 PM
1

Assuming social malice:An offer tendered is exactly that: tender. What happens to the value of a tender, when it is oversupplied? Assuming social incompetence: A beautiful woman, or arguably any woman, will likely be chased by many men, even those she might find repugnant, and that actually can engender within them a fear or consideration of how others might react to their pursuit, even if that pursuit would be welcomed, if the pursuer were the man's type, or maybe even, temporarily, if she were…
/r/MensRights09/02/24 02:38 PM
1

Indoctrination via traditional gender roles based on heuristics.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 02:34 PM
5

Things which were not widely acknowledged or properly addressed tend to be reiterated. If complaining won't help, complaining about complaining won't help, either.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 12:48 PM
4

I can speculate #believewomen cost me at least two good-paying jobs, at which I performed well, simply because coworkers and managers at that job chose to believe outside agitators, who'd been enabled by the government to spy on and grasp at straws to stigmatize me. I can speculate it's cost me at least one potential romantic interest, who probably would have made me a better person. I can speculate it's cost me some intellectual property, and the proceeds therefrom. I can speculate it's cost me…
/r/MensRights09/02/24 11:00 AM
5

I can't even begin, without breaking down into a rage, to go on about what that idiotic, douche-fueled movement has cost me, personally, through unprosecuted defamation and fraud, with no acknowledgement, apology, or compensation, whatsoever.
/r/MensRights09/02/24 10:47 AM
11

Rape Culture is real, and women partake.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 11:15 PM
1

Really, how many times have you personally witnessed the suspension of judgment setting the stage for the objectification of women? Like in a strip club. The first thing you have to do, to go in there, is suspend your judgment of those women's arguably immoral decision to dance naked, lead men on or arguably worse, for money, etc.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 04:34 PM
1

So you could say, that philosophy objectifies people, by presuming they have no sentience, or less sentience than oneself. 'It's not her fault. She's only a toy.' How dare you suggest they are more than that, for purposes of culpability?
/r/MensRights08/02/24 04:26 PM
6

Understand that needs to be explained, from time to time, because there are many people out there, who think in the opposite way. If they or their friend killed someone with a gun, it's the gun's fault, and not theirs or their friend's. If a drug killed someone in their family, it's the drug's fault, and not their beloved family member's fault. Etc...
/r/MensRights08/02/24 04:20 PM
10

Any time a woman accuses me of objectifying her, I simply tell her I am not of a philosophy which encourages adherents to morally judge inanimate objects. In other words: if I didn't consider you sentient, I wouldn't judge you, or hold you accountable, for your actions.
/r/MensRights08/02/24 04:15 PM
2

The truth is that men have always been able to overpower women. It's a preponderance of the idea that overpowering women is wrong, which keeps most of us from doing it. But obviously, that doesn't protect a woman locked up in a house with a man, when police response time is not great. As humankind tends to progress towards civility, it stands to reason: in the past, things were less civil. So yes, I have no problem believing women were mistreated, in ancient times, the middle ages, and even syst…
/r/MensRights30/01/24 05:38 AM
2

I know I said finally but: A female approaches life from an abundance of social opportunity and desensitization, and she won't understand why a man gets his hopes pinned on any one woman. She'll tell you to get over it and move into the next one, even if there aren't any like her around that you know, or you don't have feelings for anyone else. Or she'll tell you to take some time alone and work on yourself, but that won't solve your immediate problems, which might be imminently collapsing you. …
/r/MensRights30/01/24 12:31 AM
2

Finally, when a shrink gives you advice, you're trusting that shrink, with the events of your life. If their advice is bad, and they're detached from you, so it probably will be, all they're doing is getting your hopes up, and making you overconfident, and you could blow the most important opportunity of your life. That's the worst thing about a bad shrink, lawyer, accountant, or any advisor. By the time you've recognized they are terrible at what they do, they've already irreparably fucked up y…
/r/MensRights29/01/24 11:25 PM
1

And frankly, this applies to most shrinks in general, but they generally tend to not realize they are running a business, and repeat business depends upon effectiveness of treatment. So if they tell you something intended to make you feel better, but it doesn't, why keep wasting your time and money? If they suggest some stratagem that fails, once again, why keep wasting your time and money? They'll say: 'You're making progress. Keep coming back. Are you going to book another session? You need an…
/r/MensRights29/01/24 11:21 PM
2

I think a lot of female therapists might consider counselling a man a bit of a novelty when first starting out, and of course they bring an agenda into it. Personally, I don't think a stern pretense is going to help me too much. It'll only remind me of my ex. Point is: whether the shrink empathizes and is going to help you, or only sympathizes, or is antagonistic to your life's mission, which may actually be to have a bunch of chicks like her moaning into their pillows, the fact of the matter is…
/r/MensRights29/01/24 11:12 PM
3

This is one of many reasons important personal conversations should be handled in person. If someone is giving you a bunch of shit online, you never know who that is. If it's a chick, could be her ex or her brother exploited her unmanned terminal while she was AFK. Could be a government agent provocateur. A long time friend saying shit online that doesn't sound like them? Question that. Or a celebrity. Stephen King's Twitter. Question that. Stephen King hates computers. Make them tell you that s…
/r/MensRights29/01/24 10:44 PM
6

OP said he thinks social media is matriarchal. I said civil society is matriarchal in general, and some credit consent culture (as opposed to agriculture) with the advent of civilization. That of course assumes women themselves are not barbaric.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 10:02 PM
17

Any group setting where what you are saying will be judged by women, especially one where a common objective is garnering female approval, is going to be gynocentric. Hence their need to invade all exclusively male spaces, in order to take total control of narratives and dialogs.
/r/MensRights22/01/24 09:29 PM
1

Women are hard-wired to be darwinists and eugenicists. They have a limited number of eggs. They want them fertilized by good genes capable of passing on their own. It's debatable what gender taught that to others. So when people complain about the Rothschild agenda and the New World Order, they're indirectly complaining about female reproductive instincts.
/r/MensRights18/01/24 09:16 PM
1

It's always the slave's fault.
/r/MensRights18/01/24 09:13 PM
1

That's why no one should feel bad about Darwinism and eugenecism applied to them.
/r/MensRights18/01/24 06:20 PM
1

Zero-sum game reality.
/r/MensRights18/01/24 06:18 PM
2

I usually just tell them I have knives, drugs, and porn laying all around my place, and it's not safe for children, or women with stretched-out, discolored labia, looking like melted Neapolitan ice cream down there.
/r/MensRights18/12/23 06:24 PM
1

Blaming the Victim by William Ryan Manufacturing Consent by Noam Chomsky Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars by Anon
/r/MensRights18/12/23 02:42 PM
2

They're nuts to put you through that. If that kind of behavior characterizes the relationship, it may drive you to end it, because who wants to be out through that all the time? Relationships have never begun, because it's that bullshit from the beginning.
/r/MensRights18/12/23 10:08 AM
1

Honestly, I've never had a friends group that was not even more coarse than myself, though a lot of men have learned to feign PC around women. Guys night out it's 'Pussy this' and 'Bitches that', then around women, they have the gall to act genteel. Frankly, if you don't want to be friends with sexists, you won't have many friends.
/r/MensRights14/11/23 09:05 AM
1

A sexist insult (gauging someone's worth by their sex appeal), and acred flag you're talking to someone using idealism (presumedly feminism) as a means to an end, ie: a fake liberal. People who are intellectually superficial embrace feminism, as a fad, and means of getting what they want, without understanding or caring about liberalism, in general. It's ignorant at best, and at worst, downright manipulative. Carries a connotation of Objectivism, high school jocks, and cheerleaders.
/r/MensRights31/10/23 12:43 AM
6

You'll have to deal with pretentious female managers in almost any profession, even software. Most of them aren't qualified to do much but 'manage', which in my business, usually entails writing feature requests and running pointless meetings. Poorly handling HR disputes, because they often lack empathy and understanding of the human condition. You're a 'resource' they feel they need to 'be firm' with. They're Dagney Taggart to themselves, and we're John Henry, to them. They'll still need someon…
/r/MensRights27/10/23 03:42 AM
2

What pisses me off more, the insight I was forced to take to heart, in hindsight, was that relationship came out of a long dry spell, so even before that woman robbed me of my cool, I wasn't very well-accommodated. Looking back, I recognized not being happy by myself pretty much sealed my fate of being doomed to a subservient relationship, at some point. I was already disaffected, and someone gave me a reason to be loyal, to them, above all others. To someone starving, a crumb is so significant.…
/r/MensRights27/10/23 03:08 AM
3

Public school teachers, I've found, have difficulty with equal relationships, because they're so used to being in charge of a group of mentally and physically weaker people. They're also in the habit of molding others, via presentation or omission of information. Obviously, they're Statists, and it's a conflict of interest, if you or your friends are not... The solution to all of life's problems, to them, are State intervention, more school, or counselling. I lived with a woman for four years, s…
/r/MensRights27/10/23 02:29 AM
0

When Marilyn Manson got signed to a major label, they checked all his tattoos, to ensure none were antisemitic. Pretty sure they do a similar check for any MRA ideology, before letting anyone get famous.
/r/MensRights26/10/23 08:38 AM
1

Obviously everyone is different. The formal approach is often too much emotion or serious intention declared up front, and it scares them away, because it reminds them of Pepe LePew. On the other hand, a straight up physical move or proposition, from just kicking it, can often be rejected on the grounds of she has never or is unwilling to think of him, sexually, she doesn't know him well enough, the proposition seems out of context, etc. I can honestly say, my last serious girlfriend, before we …
/r/MensRights25/10/23 08:04 PM
1

The whole point of dating is to declare those intentions formally up front, to differentiate the tone from hanging out, sharing a joint, gossiping, bullshitting together, and 'I'm proposing an actual date, so say no, if that bothers you, or doesn't align with your intentions, for this relationship.' Problem being: we've all been taught, sometimes painfully, that's too formal, won't be respected, and the more effective tactic might be to be friends for awhile, then one day, if the vibe is right, …
/r/MensRights25/10/23 07:32 PM
1

A good woman can be just a friend, because they are someone else's spouse, or incompatible. Sometimes someone else's spouse, or a romantically incompatible person, is the friend you need, you are the friend they need, or both, and why deprive eachother of that friendship, or ruin it? Problem being: often times both genders presume sexual interest or intention, from mere friendly interaction.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 07:22 PM
1

Honestly, IME, the average or above woman will often surpass the average and above man, in terms of sexual conquest, almost certainly by college, often by high school, and in some cases, by junior high. Often the pressure is to compete, be left behind, or bow out, in the name of preserving one's own class, for the rare like-minded.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 06:04 PM
1

Simply recognize, if you stay single, for any length of time, the women around you will quickly surpass you, in being comparatively sexually predatorial, if they have not already, in general, by a very young age. They don't see it that way, because they define 'predator' as someone who goes out seeking and dominating, when in fact, a Venus fly trap is also a predator, though stationary, and attractive.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 04:42 PM
1

I'll even go so far as to admit I have some hypocritical desires, and it's debatable whether they should be fulfilled or forsaken. I admit there's a class of women I would fuck, but not marry. I admit that a relationship intended to be temporary should be explicitly so, from the beginning. And trying to make something permanent or long-term, out of a relationship that should be temporary if anything, is a terrible life decision, that will lead to much opportunity cost and unnecessary pain, from …
/r/MensRights25/10/23 02:55 PM
1

I recognized the acceptance, not even of moralistic idealism, but basic ethics and pragmatism, means there are many people who don't get me, and many people I don't get. I've been made to accept that. Many women still haven't. Comparatively, they've become predators, and the dichotomy between us has become unbalanced.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 02:33 PM
2

And if you're like me, somewhere around or above the 90th percentile of intelligence, it may seem like you're refusing to consider a lot of people. Pretty people. Nice people. People who seem to care about you, and it may seem rude not to return that. But I simply remember 'There is enough for everyone's need, but not for everyone's greed.' In an ideal world, everyone gets a spouse, so statistically, most people are for someone else, anyway. In an ideal world, the conscientious are not starved b…
/r/MensRights25/10/23 02:04 PM
3

That's why I implore men to join the movement. Recognize how your depravity has lowered your standards far below what they should have been, in the past, hurting both yourself, the women you've been with, and other men. Stop dating anyone beneath your level of intellect and achievement. Stop dating anyone heavier than you, or with more sexual partners in their background than you. Be a stickler for details. Be a hardliner. Above all, don't date anyone who has not done The Work.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 01:11 PM
5

Ultimately, because I have spent so much time alone, and because I have genuinely listened to what women had to say, about men in general, about me particularly, even though a lot of it is toxic, biased, hypocritical, and deliberately hurtful, for nefarious purposes, and they will get other guys to sing those choruses as well, I get the feeling that I have done all this painful, introspective, emotional, psychological work, to achieve progress, but they have not. Ultimately, it's yet another sig…
/r/MensRights25/10/23 12:25 PM
5

I genuinely don't believe most women are doing what I'm doing: acknowledging the gap between desire and fit. Because collectively, men have not made them do that, via neglect. The kind of being sat alone in the corner that causes self-evaluation. Is what a lot of them need. Because truly, they can get guys, but not keep them for long. Their immodesty makes them damaged goods.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 12:05 PM
11

Like, most women have decided they'll settle for no less than Fabio, when in fact, most women are far from being Taylor Swift, themselves. They want us all to think of ourselves as Uncle Leo, and that we should cling to 'anyone willing to tolerate our presence for more than five minutes'... It's a very pretentious and toxic bargaining tactic, and I'm pissed off that more men don't call their bluff. Leave them out in the cold. Often times, we can take it, but they can't. Learn to let them suffer …
/r/MensRights25/10/23 07:55 AM
11

All I know is the last time I actually paid money to find out who liked me, I was so... Underwhelmed isn't a strong enough word, so let's say disgusted, like, normally if a chick was coming onto me, I'd give her points for effort, and let a few obvious incompatibilities slide, but these chicks, I was like 'Not a chance.' So I'm just like 'I don't fall for that shit anymore.' Honestly, even when I feel like I'm being charitable to like someone, like, really brutally honest about what I want versu…
/r/MensRights25/10/23 07:36 AM
5

I've said it before, and I'll say it again: Uplift the downtrodden, or ridicule the unpopular? Proud Democrat.
/r/MensRights25/10/23 07:18 AM
10

Saying 'How do we radicalize' anyone makes you sound like an agent provocateur. Try sounding less like an agent provocateur.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 04:32 PM
3

Exactly why the presence of women on battlefields has been questioned. Men are so protective of women, they'll sacrifice mission objectives to protect them. It's psychologically abhorrent for men to see women in pain, or get killed, and men will do irrational things, to prevent that. It's bad for strategy.
/r/MensRights18/10/23 04:05 PM
1

I'm personally of the opinion that males and females should be raised the same way, including the aloof pretense, or lack thereof. Including the hand-holding, or lack thereof. Including equal funding of their pursuits and interests, which are often very different, but both require budgets. Anything you do for your female offspring, you should also do for your male, and the idea that women need extra help, in some ways, is ridiculous. Anything denied to your male offspring, should also be denied …
/r/MensRights18/10/23 03:44 PM
1

Men have to spend money, to have a social life. Women, notsomuch. They spend money on themselves, to look pretty, and claim that is for no one but themselves. Often, men think "I need more money to cover (potential) second and third family members, who will likely be liabilities."
/r/MensRights17/10/23 02:25 PM
2

I'm SWM, have 15+ years in tech, and have never once been in charge. But the technocrats still need us for all the stuff it would hurt their generalist brains to figure out.
/r/MensRights15/10/23 04:17 AM
1

Most women need a diet, not someone buying them food. 'Be the change you want to see in the world.'
/r/MensRights04/10/23 03:26 AM
24

My experience with women is they will dump a guy the exact second the relationship stops being fun. I'm not bagging on chicks for leaving someone abusive, but simply hard times in a man's life are chick-repellent.
/r/MensRights28/09/23 04:22 PM
1

But also, yeah, some guys have different priorities than mine. You tell them that stuff, maybe they want your body anyway, and sense vulnerability. So I don't know what to tell you, other than: don't misperceive one type as another. And don't judge us superficially. I'm not self-conscious about my class or intelligence, so I don't put on a pretense of class and intelligence. You might see me in a heavy metal shirt, and think of me as another low-class psycho. Meanwhile, you're dating Patrick Bat…
/r/MensRights25/09/23 05:16 PM
1

It's very easy to kill my interest. Just tell me the truth. If you have 10x more sexual partners in your past. If you have kids from a previous relationship. If you have $90K in credit card debt. All of those things will make me think 'Let's just be friends,' and I will be happy I learned that sooner, rather than later, so I can stop idealizing you, in my mind.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 04:53 PM
1

I've moved cities now twice in my life. I'm used to being an outsider, and pain has taught me not to catch feelings so easily. I'm looking around, and don't know who I want/don't know enough about anyone to want them badly enough to follow through. If I knew more about any given individual, I might find them more or less desirable. Point is: it's a superficial world that wants me to fuck first, and ask questions later.
/r/MensRights25/09/23 04:35 PM
1

Just because you acknowledge someone's presence, and include them in your conversation, doesn't mean you have to include him in your vagina, nor should you assume that's what he wants, always. As a man, I often feel as though I can slide in and out of places completely unnoticed. Women don't want to 'give me the wrong impression', or 'get my hopes up', so they're super-reserved around me. But I'm an adult, who realizes: statistically, most people are not for me. I'm fatalistic enough about roman…
/r/MensRights25/09/23 04:25 PM
17

It's not only your background, but getting out into the world, you'll see all kinds of ugliness and obnoxiousness from people. Out of the frying pan, into the fire. It's all happening again! LoL, not to discourage you, but it's rough out there. You gotta have a thick skin, and the ability to evade those who will only drag you down.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 07:55 PM
7

Unless he has some kind of fetish where that's really what he's into, I'd suspect he is being exploited, mismatched, or settling for lesser than he deserves. Every time that happens, it sets a bad precedent, which effects all of us.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 07:32 PM
2

I don't glorify men who are promiscuous. I see them as pissing in the dating pool.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 02:33 PM
1

Always, never, all, everyone, no one... Usage of such generalizations is the mark of both ignorance and stupidity.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 01:59 PM
1

The never-nudes and don't-touch-me's are trying to phase out hugging. I recently got mean-mugged by my doorstaff for hugging a cleaning lady, on her way out.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 01:47 PM
1

It's easier to write a character of low intelligence than one of high intelligence.
/r/MensRights22/09/23 11:58 AM
1

I was once falsely accused of domestic violence, for writing a blog about my ex, from 250 miles away. Ultimately, the court went to extraordinary and unquestionably unconstitutional measures, merely to stop me from tarnishing her reputation. Although I do admit some corrective action was necessary, as I was distraught and arguably somewhat obsessed with injustices committed against me, correction should not have been punitive. But most people, all they see is a ruling, and think of it as officia…
/r/MensRights20/09/23 04:53 PM
2

3rd wave feminists, by definition, enforce the stalest, oldest-school customs, if they benefit from them, while at the same time clutching a 'progressive' card, which should probably be pulled.
/r/MensRights20/09/23 03:26 PM
1

Women are the ultimate eugenicists, and they often mask that as concern for their own health, but clearly your (ex)-wife simply wants you out of the gene pool. They say every woman needs two men: one for genes, one for resources. You're the jackass paying for it all.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 07:36 PM
2

Absolutely a sexist, ableist word, as in: inferring someone's worth from their sex life or appeal. I think of it as a red flag that the person you are talking to is a fake liberal, probably using idealism as a means to an end.
/r/MensRights13/09/23 03:06 PM
1

I would say, right before she comes over, turn audio recorders on. You're not capturing her image, only ensuring there were no audible signs of struggle, in any of your interactions. On the other hand, she might pull the old 'Stop it!' when you're on the other side of the room, merely to make it sound like you did something wrong. But if you're taking videos of people without their knowledge or permission, when sexual activities are going on, it leaves you open to other accusations, like making …
/r/MensRights11/09/23 09:10 PM
1

If they are not willing to incur any social, emotional, or financial risk, then they are not yet accustomed to the responsibilities of adulthood, possibly because society has insulated them from blame or consequence, for most of their lives. But merely because they will not be an adult with you, does not mean they will not be an adolescent, with someone who is willing to play adolescent games with them, even at 30 or 40+. That's the difference between empowerment and enablement. Many women feel …
/r/MensRights30/08/23 03:24 PM
10

not only that, if she is bad, before, during, or after, even without your knowledge, people will assume you are equally as bad, and that's simply how your relationship worked, or you corrupted her, somehow. All a conspiracy to shift risk and blame onto us, and characterize female sexuality as liberation, male sexuality as exploitation. By limiting our options with social conventions, they are trying to implement female pick of the litter, for our entire lives, but retain the right to blame us, f…
/r/MensRights29/08/23 05:00 PM
2

Or, they think men have no inhibitions, because they think men have no emotions. They say they want more sensitive males. They don't want to accommodate the ramifications. They breed with psychopaths instead. Women are slave-driving conquerors, who want fellow conquerors to pool resources with, and then a biomass of obedience, to do their bidding.
/r/MensRights14/10/21 07:48 PM
1

What I'm also saying: it could cost either gender, to not be a whore. I think if I really wanted to schmooze, I'd be quite good at it. I simply don't enjoy being fake with other people. Living expenses are higher for single people. We have to go out and find things and others that interest us. Exploration, prospecting... is expensive. I have a female friend who loves to point out to me that men are not the only ones with money, and I'm like, 'Yeah, I know. You're a Trustifarian.' Point is: you, …
/r/MensRights10/04/21 07:14 PM
1

You need to work on your reading comprehension. What I said was: This is what you have to do, if you want to have what they call 'an active social life'. If you value that. Do you know what IF means? Because frequently, I don't value that. I don't find the females available to me particularly valuABLE, so I leave them on the ground, not touching them, as one would a piece of dirt. But I notice that costs me, socially, and that does translate to a loss of professional opportunity, and ultimately,…
/r/MensRights10/04/21 06:59 PM
1

Let's just say you're new in a big city. The liberal feminists have asserted their right, their *need* to assume you are a rapist. You have to prove to them you are not a rapist. That is the very first assumption you must dispell, I've learned. The second assumption 'he's not cool'. What is cool? Giving without expectation. As in, 'Those dudes from California were so rich, they paid for the whole ski trip, no pressure. They have so much money, they literally don't even care about the cost of our…
/r/MensRights10/04/21 12:17 PM
1

Eventually you'll realize: you are appeasing terrorists, but it's better than getting their blood (or your own) on your hands. A bum calls you a fat-cat pig. Give him a dollar. Don't have any ones in your pocket the next day? You're a fat-cat pig again! They don't care about all the dollars you've given other bums, or the dollar you gave them personally yesterday. They forgot about the time they put a knife to your throat for crack, or robbed your flat while you were working. You're a fat-cat pi…
/r/MensRights10/04/21 11:27 AM
1

isn’t that enough Yeah, it is. The difference being: in a moment of weakness, I turned to a somewhat familiar shoulder to cry on. And that can be bad, if it goes too far. As Eddy Murphy said 'The bitch kept coming around, catered to his ego a bit, and now they're a couple.' Be wary of that, because that can turn into a lifetime commitment of convenience, when you could have done better. what is there to gain? Reputation. Social capitol. 'He took me out, paid, expected nothing.' Assuming they are…
/r/MensRights10/04/21 11:08 AM
2

If your buddy were broke, but you wanted to see a movie with him, you'd pay for his ticket, right? Think of it like that. It's everyone else who over-complicates it, because they have an interest in selling drama. I'm not saying let women exploit you financially, I'm just saying: When you're flush, recognize when someone makes less than you, and when you want their company, pay for their meal. But if you find their company unpleasant or not worth it, that's it for them. That's all they get out o…
/r/MensRights10/04/21 10:39 AM
10

I actually didn't fuck that chick. I took her out to dinner one night, feeling vulnerable, because my cat had died. Paid for her meal, no expectations other than company, then retired alone to my chambers. That's what women get for accusing me of having a sense of entitlement: hands-off pity, ultimately. Dinner and drinks was better than bouncing around in my head about my cat all night, I'll give her that. I figured out you have to do that sometimes: take out chicks you have no interest in, jus…
/r/MensRights10/04/21 02:28 AM
36

At my last apartment complex, there was a pool. I'm not an antisocial guy, so I get to know my neighbors. One of them was an overweight woman, who seemed to be in the company of different men from day to day. One day, I encountered her at the corner bar, and she said she'd been beaten by her boyfriend, who was then taken to jail. 'Which one?' I asked. First time I ever brought that up. I had a difficult, frustrating job. Worked hard merely to be living in a somewhat ghetto apartment complex. At …
/r/MensRights09/04/21 10:56 PM
19

I would never want to be a cop. It showcases how power-hungry, manipulative, and controlling women are, to even want the job.
/r/MensRights05/04/21 06:50 AM
0

Proof we're all n-words to women.
/r/MensRights03/12/20 01:58 AM
1

I suggest a budget of $1Bn. Let's bankrupt whatever idiot came up with that horrible idea. They'll suffer Gillette's fate.
/r/MensRights30/11/20 05:31 PM
8

Someone once said 'feminism means love for everyone', and I said 'yeah, just like communism means grain for everyone!'
/r/MensRights21/11/20 12:45 PM
1

IME, it wouldn't matter if she had robbed him, raped him, etc... 'She has the money now, and you're the rapist!' is all a collusive court would consider, probably. In laissez-faire capitalism, where finance is the only measure of merit, to the spoils go the victory.
/r/MensRights08/11/20 07:17 PM
2

Someone needs to start giving feminists the 'sense of entitlement' lecture, until they admit they are more Ayn Rand than Emma Goldman.
/r/MensRights15/10/20 11:03 PM
3

2600 is not a random number. Wearing or purchasing the dress is likely some sort of tradecraft signal.
/r/MensRights08/10/20 05:32 AM
1

A 3rd wave feminist has gotten mad at me, for saying exactly this.
/r/MensRights04/10/20 03:06 AM
1

Sexual exploitation can happen via unwanted inclusion OR exclusion, IMO. In terms of traditional gender roles, we think of women as having been sexually exploited via over-inclusion, and men as having been exploited via under-inclusion, but this is actually a function of power and intention, not gender. As false rape accusations are intended to stigmatize and exclude someone, yes they are exploitative, using sex as a basis, carrying sexual, social, financial, and legal consequences.
/r/MensRights01/10/20 08:10 PM
9

WTF was going through those parents' minds? 'We're gonna show him how it feels. God-damned, sick pervert. Ooh, ah, yeah. Fucking sick young man.'
/r/MensRights29/09/20 02:07 PM
1

your work will always pale in comparison, to a narcissist which most women are
/r/MensRights14/08/20 09:36 AM
9

I hope Will Smith is happy. I really do. He deserves to be happy. I've never seen him as anything but an innocent man. As for me, finding true happiness meant walking away from people I feel I can't trust, even if that's eventually everyone.
/r/MensRights15/07/20 02:54 PM
2

Or, even if he treated her better. If he accused her, she would suppress him, and the whole community would take her side.
/r/MensRights14/07/20 01:12 PM
1

Oh man, I think Eddie Murphy did a standup routine about that, when it happened to Johnny Carson.
/r/MensRights09/07/20 11:21 PM
8

Once you learn to see past their smiles and their bodies, you see them for who they are inside: lazy, gluttonous cretins.
/r/MensRights08/07/20 04:35 AM
1

Agreed. And some guys will be kept in a holding pattern until they run out of fuel, crash, and burn. And that's the collective intention of the entire female community, in many cases. It's your classic 'one against Many' scenario. And the women who deliberately do this don't understand why someone subjected to it might reject democracy. But in fact, over time, the female community has done this to so many individual men, it has become 'many vs many', and that's when women play the victim card (e…
/r/MensRights29/06/20 07:25 PM
14

'well, they're just trying to feed themselves. It's the same as stealing a loaf of bread to feed your starving family' Except when a man sneaks food, he does so in shame He doesn't want to get caught. He knows it's wrong It's literally something he has to do, not just for himself, but for others who depend on him What he doesn't do is emotionally manipulate someone under the pretense of 'love' Someone who has already been manipulated thusly many times, and the last thing they need is another dro…
/r/MensRights28/06/20 11:51 AM
1

femeneo
/r/MensRights28/06/20 11:30 AM
1

I've been mulling this over in my mind, and it really doesn't make sense. Bieber should be well-aware that his fans are people who went to Young Life in high school. Why would he do that to one of them, of all people? I find it hard to believe that even he would be that stupid. I mean, come on... there's gotta be people he can call, right? That one of the accusations is coming out of Austin makes me suspicious as well. It's exactly the kind of place where a scam like that would be pulled on some…
/r/MensRights26/06/20 12:21 PM
4

That's the whole reason I didn't go. Not gonna get blamed by one of many racists and sexists who seem cognitively unable to distinguish these straight white males from those straight white males. Nor gonna be a martyr or scapegoat for them.
/r/MensRights03/06/20 07:53 PM
1

Either gender could be narcissistic. I get it. And I've had troubles with male narcissists, too, believe me. It's another one of those things that's everywhere, and inundates people, until we are all infected, to varying degrees. But what's especially poignant, to the cishetero male, is that we are supposed to fall in love with one of these deceptive creatures society has enabled. Most of us can easily stomach the idea of ruthlessly competing with our own gender.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 08:53 PM
4

And like, frankly dude, I don't give two shits about male models, either. Have you ever hung out with models in general? They're a toxic crowd with a superficial understanding of everything, and delusions of social conscience. They're privileged bubble-people, and can often be deceitfully abusive with their social capital, which was borne of sexism. It doesn't make ugly people more attractive, but all beautiful people are flawed. Most of them are spoiled and enabled to be idiots their whole live…
/r/MensRights24/05/20 12:13 AM
1

Obviously there's more to it than that. I mean baiting, projection, conceit, cult of no personality, self-care orgies, etc... Who scores higher on those indexes, men or women? The photos are only the tip of the iceberg.
/r/MensRights24/05/20 12:06 AM
18

Yeah, women have developed entire careers out of posting lewd photographs on the internet, but men are the narcissists. What complete doublethink. Those people get the definitions of their terms from revisionists, probably.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 11:39 PM
1

As a man, you are expected to be a schmoozer. Any admission of human flaw will be held against you by the melodramatic, who manipulate the impressionable with hysteria.
/r/MensRights23/05/20 11:04 PM
27

It's simply the way really crass, sexist women (and men) think. 'I wore my sluttiest dress, why didn't he come onto me? He must be ga-ay!' I mean seriously, women came up with that, and douchebags simply go along with it. First, they act like they're hot shit, everyone wants them, and there would be no cost to banging them, then they try to juice you, and when you walk away, they try to bring you back into their flock to be fleeced by playing ego games. But if you had banged them, they and the w…
/r/MensRights17/05/20 10:10 PM
24

Yeah, girls, work will make you free! Read 'The Fountainhead'. Work hard, increase productivity, prevent accidents. Buy more. Buy more now. Buy more and be happy!
/r/MensRights17/05/20 04:55 PM
4

That's not satire, that's straight-up doublethink.
/r/MensRights16/05/20 09:48 PM
2

I've worked with the kind of men who consider that clever. shudders
/r/MensRights16/05/20 07:03 PM
0

'shut down everything'
/r/MensRights05/05/20 12:17 PM
2

I've actually witnessed 'boys will be boys' being used to imply homosexuality, at a freaky anime convention. Maybe they thought that went over my head, but I really just didn't care.
/r/MensRights03/05/20 04:08 AM
5

So, the biological father is off the hook? Why, because he isn't part of the patriarchy? So, women play favorites with the poolboy, but not the breadwinner. And then think of themselves as righteous Marxists. What complete trash. Try to imagine the self-centered hypocrite who thinks that's reasonable. Now realize many women are like that, without telling their spouse. Then the spouse ultimately gets blamed for 'having bad character judgment'.
/r/MensRights22/04/20 12:58 PM
2

I remember when I was on probation for drugs. They make you pee in a cold, government chamber, with an agent watching, to make sure that piss came out of you. Of course it's dehumanizing, and your dick will never be smaller than under those conditions. I always wanted to joke with the guy: 'You can clearly see why I have a drug problem, right?' My county's probation department's motto was 'Build bridges, not walls'. What a joke. They built many walls around me, walls that still stand to this day…
/r/MensRights19/04/20 05:36 PM
2

Maybe you're being held down by rumors spread by a bunch of guys who saw you in the locker room, when that situation may not engorge your penis with circulatory fluid, unless you're gay...
/r/MensRights19/04/20 05:32 PM
2

You may laugh, but this is the piece of cheese every mousetrap should have. Get that evidence documented, and get a paycheck out of it. Then maybe you might approach the females' level of privilege.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 05:28 PM
8

'spread your cheeks and lift your sac'
/r/MensRights19/04/20 05:26 PM
1

What if someone hacks into your phone and steals dick pics in an encrypted folder, then distributes them behind your back? Is that worth anything in civil court? What if you specifically put those photos there, knowing this would eventually happen, just to dispell rumors you have an abnormally small penis? Does this help or hurt your case? Asking for a friend.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 04:48 PM
1

That's an interesting piece of propaganda to me, recalling how much crime I've personally been enticed to commit on women's behalf. 'Go pick up the drugs.' Then another woman punishes us for it. Then if you ask them to do it, for a change, it becomes an argument they use against you, an argument taken more seriously than when it is applied to them, even though it's far more relevant to them.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 01:53 PM
16

From an evolutionary standpoint, he's asking why mutants are allowed. He implies the more reactionary position. The Y chromosome exists to speed up the evolutionary process, and diversify. Why anything newer, faster, more robust? My father once told me that men manipulate the world, and women manipulate men. The genders could switch roles, but seem to have their specialties.
/r/MensRights19/04/20 03:38 AM
9

It's not that women always or even often create the impression they are wonderful, it's that, due to the binary presuppositions of feminist insistence, if you telegraph that you don't think even one woman, or subset of women in general are not 'wonderful', you are a 'misogynist', and no one wants to be perceived as that! That's how you get fired and starved to death.
/r/MensRights18/04/20 11:58 PM
1

How does it feel to be conflated with someone I didn't vote for, you mean? Someone needs to start giving the smart girls microphones.
/r/MensRights14/04/20 04:36 PM
3

At least he can't be accused of being a 'fake geek girl'.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 01:05 PM
2

You'd expect someone going through that would have empathy for someone else going through it, right? But women let the gender war preclude that, displaying a total lack of empathy. So it calls into question the occasions when they act empathetic. What do smart sociopaths do? Learn to pretend they have emotions and ethics, when it benefits them, to appear so.
/r/MensRights13/04/20 01:02 PM
3

I've actually been conditioned, by women, to hold doors open, for other women! The feminist camp seems divided about this. A bunch of them think it is patronizing, as if they could not do it for themselves, or even that it is manipulative, trying to show them and the world what a 'nice guy' I am. But the 3rd-wavers insist I owe them this chivalrous gesture, on top of equal rights. There is no way to simultaneously win everyone's approval, and you have no way of knowing which camp anyone belongs …
/r/MensRights04/04/20 09:40 PM
1

We can, but what are the consequences? A bunch of behind-the-back accusations of being impotent, prejudiced, or gay.
/r/MensRights04/04/20 12:34 PM
2

Checkmark by your name = having bias accepted by platform owners
/r/MensRights04/04/20 12:32 PM
13

I remember the cycle: her nagging you, being demanding, making you mad, because much of it is unreasonable or unethical, then her feeling bad, and then it's 'let's jump his bones to win his approval back'. But at some point, you're so disgusted with her personality, intellectually emotionally, or morally, you aren't in the mood, and yet she will manipulate your body's natural responses, anyway, just to get you physically aroused. Then you have sex anyway, but you realize you are being assuaged a…
/r/MensRights04/04/20 12:20 PM
7

The thing that immediately occurs to me is that the same Hollywood phony types who once said 'sex sells', and continue to use women in deceptive advertising, are also now saying 'believe women', and it's simply scary, that they are being taken seriously.
/r/MensRights28/03/20 01:55 PM
2

Micro-expressions! duhn-dahn-DAH!
/r/MensRights17/03/20 10:40 PM
1

Cougars... Tinder... None of that seems appealing to me at all. I go out sometimes, but everyone seems mediocre. And no one is really all that forthright, either. They seem to think playing coy will help them, but it's just a petty game, so they only get people willing to play petty games. In trying to do better, they often do worse. Like, some of the mediocre chicks I might give a chance, if they had the strength to initiate a conversation... If they had anything smart to say. I might overlook …
/r/MensRights13/03/20 09:59 AM
13

I've always said if you have even one loose woman in your past, you should have a gun, to protect yourself from the other men she is/has been with. Women can always shack up with some desperate soldier of fortune with a gun collection... Or some would-be white knight cop. What that man might not do for money or drugs, he might do for that woman. If her baggage bothered her too much, she could setup a way to get everyone to cancel eachother out. There are many unprosecuted conspiracy to murder ca…
/r/MensRights12/03/20 02:50 AM
2

Yeah, then you get the chicks who are sick of the whole thing, and want out... either through frigid spinsterism, or marriage... and you hope they find a guy who's been around as much as them, and wants to settle with them. But it's equally possible they could have no takers, or even, they end up exploiting the naive guy. And that's a bad marriage waiting to happen. Anyway, when a woman loses her beauty, then she understands angry male music. She doesn't live in a gumdrop house on lollipop lane …
/r/MensRights10/03/20 11:00 PM
1

Actually, I should clarify and say there is a 3rd type, what we could charitably call 'the serial monogamist', but she's really just a whore with standards. In other words: only for sale to the right buyers. Or, she's truly promiscuous at heart, but doesn't want people to know, so she strategically turns down some guys, and those guys just happen to be broke, ugly, or both. Or the guys she turns down could actually be guys she insecurely doesn't feel good enough for. Maybe she doesn't want to be…
/r/MensRights10/03/20 08:24 PM
2

IME, the highest-value women are monogamists with very high standards. And if they are beautiful, they can get away with it. Guys will line up just to buy them dinner, have a magical evening, where they are enthralled with someone who is fun to look at. Then when they don't get any, they are a little disappointed, and maybe feel a little played, but it was still better than dining alone, and then they get to say they dated that woman, and let others infer from that what they will. Moreover, unle…
/r/MensRights10/03/20 07:57 PM
3

It's funny, because I was in a live-in relationship with a pretty typical (including the selfish hypocrisy) communist SJW chick at the time, so she had influenced me to be a lot more leftist than my normal libertarian self, and yet I still wanted more money, to keep her happy.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 03:46 PM
3

Some background: at the time I was working at a photo-printing software company, and it was during the 2008 Recession. Obviously, the photo-printing industry was and always will be in severe decline, due to internet photo-sharing. So, even though I wanted to move up in that company, and had the merit to move up in that company, it just wasn't gonna happen, and I ended up stuck there for 3 years, until my then-GF graduated college, and we moved to a bigger city, with more opportunities.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 03:10 PM
6

That blog was first published over ten years ago, when I was a lot more left of center than I am now. But I still keep it up, as fuel for anyone entering salary negotiations.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 02:45 PM
4

I honestly think this is most apparent in monogamy, especially in a natural environment, with many different beauty classes. We can all have a woman, but we can't all have the 'it girl'. So what gets hammered into us is: 'Don't get your heart set on anyone, don't have standards, and don't pursue anyone. Let everyone else pick for you, and by process of elimination, get stuck with leftovers or factory seconds.' and then when compromise inevitably fails, get blamed.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 02:43 PM
2

I already have: https://jtourdet.wordpress.com/2011/11/28/corporate-employment-and-the-zero-sum-game/
/r/MensRights10/03/20 02:27 PM
-7

Oh, but it was. Some people simply can't acknowledge that, in many ways, rights can be a zero-sum game. And they are no better than the capitalists who can't acknowledge that corporate employment is a zero-sum game.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 02:08 PM
11

I can tell you this: I got stuck in this Podunk town where they will hold you over a barrel for any problem (single, car broken down, whatever), and so I rode my bike for awhile, and women definitely looked down on me for that. So Eco-Princesses around here, they are most certainly not. Also not one of them said, 'I'll pick you up in my car that daddy bought me', so poor at sharing, too.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 01:11 PM
23

IME: -Many women don't care about the environment, or only say they do. In fact, I've gotten lectures for 'not keeping house', because I sort my garbage for recycling, and also that an electric vehicle is a waste of money -Sharing? Hah! Most of these feminists are more Ayn Rand than Emma Goldman. If they were any good at sharing, these forums wouldn't exist. -People/Quality of life... within their clique, maybe -Women cut eachother's throats all the time. -Failing as an incident, really? Women d…
/r/MensRights10/03/20 12:09 PM
35

Men get the negative bias, women get the positive bias.
/r/MensRights10/03/20 11:17 AM
-1

The guys making fun of him Their egos have been pumped up by prostitutes The More You Know...
/r/MensRights10/03/20 11:12 AM
1

This group and r/conspiracy people tend to hate on quite a bit. I'm just like 'Wow, you people really let mass media think for you, don't you?'
/r/MensRights06/03/20 03:50 PM
3

They do, though. And they talk to the people around you, they try to control peoples' opinions of you. It's all part of their narcissism. In fact, this most likely began before you broke up. Even while you were supporting them, with a blindly positive bias, they were rationalizing mistreating and eventually abandoning you, to their friends, and possibly even your friends. Don't get sucked into a shit-flinging contest. It only makes you look like the bad guy. Just outshine whatever they are sayin…
/r/MensRights06/03/20 03:01 AM
1

Of course, because I live in the South, everyone tries to frame this as my deficiency. 'You don't have enough confidence.' It's like if a used car salesman said 'It's too bad you don't have enough confidence to finance this beat-up 1986 Suburban.' I mean, you'd immediately recognize that as a gimmick, and walk away from the guy, right? What kind of egotistical idiot would say 'I'm going to finance this shitty car, just so you'll know that I can! I'm gonna finance all your shitty cars. Sucker.'
/r/MensRights02/03/20 04:18 PM
1

You pretty much have to be a toxic opportunist to get anyone around here, and yet that doesn't make me want to be a toxic opportunist, or even look up to them. I just think, 'Wow, the whole world is a sweaty hog pit, and it's just kinda disgusting.'
/r/MensRights02/03/20 03:46 PM
1

As much as women decry men with high sense of entitlement, women do not reward your low sense of entitlement. They reward someone else's high sense of entitlement. And even knowing that, I have a low desire, not by choice, but naturally, because I'm almost 40. I've had experiences that cause me to see red flags before they affect me. But nobody is going to give you a gold medal for successfully running an obstacle course. Instead, everyone seems happy they have fallen into one trap or another.
/r/MensRights02/03/20 03:32 PM
1

I think another big part of the problem is that, while I can be very assertive on the internet (what they call 'keyboard balls'), in person I am very mild and polite. It's not likely that I will ever bring up MRA shit IRL, unless the conversation naturally goes that way. It's far more likely I will 'play by the rules', have an unsatisfying interaction, and then blog about it later. I guess that makes me kind of 'two-faced' to a lot of people. I just don't believe in ruining the moment with my cy…
/r/MensRights02/03/20 03:01 PM
1

I have not impregnated anyone. No one, in the past few years, could accuse me of rape from regrettable sex. But because I've had bad relationship experience, and am very wary of having any more, people think I'm going to go crazy, and shoot up a church, or something. So people keep thinking 'Put him in a broken elevator with the least desirable woman in town' is the solution. And it's really just a lot of pressure I don't want.
/r/MensRights02/03/20 02:16 PM
0

I think the TLDR on this is: Nobody likes the 'lone wolf', who is 'too political'. They instead prefer those who are 'just going along to get along', by conforming to 'the norm', even if that is totally toxic.
/r/MensRights02/03/20 02:00 PM
2

I mean, I can't count the number of times, I'm out with friends, probably just there to get out of the pad, and maybe hear something original. I do not see anyone there who strikes me as 'this could be your soulmate', plus I've read and agree with articles such as 'You Will Not Hook Up At The Show' (https://www.rookiemag.com/2013/08/you-will-not-hook-up-at-the-show/). In fact, something very similar to the following happened to me recently: My friends are like 'You need to get back in the game, …
/r/MensRights02/03/20 01:51 PM
1

Most of my friends get more than me. They put more pressure on women. They compromise more than I do. Often times, they put pressure on me, to do as they do. I'm kind of a hold out. I don't enjoy compromise or pressuring women. I instead advocate for men's rights. Why do people consider ME the dangerous person?
/r/MensRights02/03/20 01:29 PM
3

Hey, guy who got raped by a teacher, an authority figure the shitty local government put in charge of you went so far in her manipulations as to warp your ideas of love and sex, before you were even legally able to consent. Lucky you! People will always look at you funny, and you might even have some Stockholm Syndrome-esque lingering feelings for that exploiter, who was whisked away by the justice system. But at the end of the day, some moron on Twitter is going to issue blanket statements abou…
/r/MensRights20/02/20 06:52 PM
5

My God, the toxic shit in this. The idea that people shouldn't have specific tastes. That sex should be a random encounter, and not a planned intention. That not wanting to have sex with an obnoxious or unattractive person connotes disability, or that people who actually have a disability are bad for medicating it. That completely normal, healthy men should actually take pills, in order to artificially over-ride a natural, physical rejection of another person... And you know they're not applying…
/r/MensRights07/02/20 12:04 PM
1

I just think it's really sickening how people lack the self-awareness to realize they are hypocrites in taking common rationalizations for abuse of females ('She didn't file a report, or not to the right people, or by the time she raised the issue, it was irrelevant') and applying it to a male. That's disgusting.
/r/MensRights04/02/20 11:20 PM
1

I've been through something similar (in terms of me suffering the bad reputation from court, rather than her suffering the bad reputation of actual exploitation/abuse), but I never thought it could happen to a man of wealth and popularity (which I've never been, personally). I questioned the Rolling Stone article, but thought 'it couldn't be too far off. Here's a guy with PR agents, millions, and fancy lawyers... How could they let this happen to him, unless he were at least somewhat in the wron…
/r/MensRights04/02/20 11:12 PM
-1

I got put in jail for 90 days for 'violating a protective order', which was obtained from a civil court based on the ruling I had 'made threats', which I had not actually made, only judgmental statements. I continued to make judgmental statements after appealing the order, but was placed in contempt of court for 90 days. Despite all this, if you Google my legal name, due to clerical error, you will see 'Contempt of Child Support Order', even though, I have no children. So, to people who know abs…
/r/MensRights03/02/20 06:24 PM
1

I was unable to post the following comment on the 'men don't respect women who approach them' thread. Shame, because it might have helped some of those crass heaux: It really depends on your approach. Some women have approached me on what they thought was a 'guy level', only to find out, I'm actually not a typical beer-swilling, football-obsessed pig. Like, an invite to a museum or park, something public and cheap/free, might have landed better than a 'below the belt' approach, or appeal to some…
/r/MensRights17/01/20 06:36 PM
5

'dumb propaganda bullshit', definitely sounds like the refined eloquence of a dedicatedly nonviolent person. J/K, sounds like Slaag the Cave-Woman.
/r/MensRights07/01/20 06:15 PM
2

I just get really pissed when she's the type who doesn't respect you if you don't make moves within a certain timeframe. I'm just like: 'this is not me being chickenshit, this is me scoping you out, trying to make sure you're fucking cool, like as in, won't twist the knife in my fucking back, like so many others have.'
/r/MensRights31/12/19 04:59 AM
2

'Allies' be like: 'Who are all these women who want to have sex on the first date so badly?'
/r/MensRights31/12/19 03:50 AM
9

Ironically, what you'd think to hire a man for, like robbery or assault, makes more sense to hire a woman these days. Hey maybe that's a good thing. Us men can just sit back on the sidelines, and let the women fight eachother for our food. I might take up crochet.
/r/MensRights29/12/19 11:33 PM
50

I've definitely experienced similar in the software industry before. Thankfully, some companies still care more about ability than ensuring every one of the over 9000 genders is represented equally in their roster. But yeah, there are some cush gigs out there for tokens. Everyone else actually has to prove their merit, and we can often be held to far higher standards, because it is assumed we've been enabled by social advantages.
/r/MensRights28/12/19 10:08 PM
5

It's almost as if, hear me out: in a society where women's pettiness is enabled, women will continue stacking ridiculousness on top of ridiculousness until it's gotten so extreme, they can no longer get away with it, and by that time, probably more than one person's life has gotten fucked up.
/r/MensRights25/12/19 07:37 AM
1

I'd say 'teach people not to be pigs', but realistically, you're only shaming people of conscience, and that only leaves more for the incurable pigs.
/r/MensRights15/12/19 05:09 AM
1

It's quite simple, really: as a runt of the pack, not myself affluent (though arguably a bunch of people in my family were/are), and a substance abuse problem to boot, the only women I could get were promiscuous. And eventually, I realized those women did me more harm than good. I even held out for someone I genuinely believed was 'classy', but it turns out she was only telling me what I wanted to hear, and her family straight-up went along with it, thinking I might be 'the one' to 'save her'. T…
/r/MensRights26/10/19 12:46 AM
23

I get so tired of 'incel' being misapplied, to anyone, really. It's become a word 18-24 year olds (and some super-immature people older than that) have used to tease the unpopular, in what basically amounts to Jr High teeny-bopper gang warfare. I always try to explain my actual situation: my whole life, I've only ever been allowed a certain type of woman. I decided that type is no good for me, and keeps those who would be positive influences (not to mention, you know, satisfying) away. So I've s…
/r/MensRights22/10/19 01:31 AM
11

Reminds me of an old Seinfeld routine: The idea behind the tuxedo is the woman's point of view that men are all the same, so we might as well dress them that way. That's why a wedding is like the joining together of a beautiful glowing bride, and some guy. The tuxedo is a wedding safety device created by women because they know that men are undependable. So in case the groom chickens out, everybody just takes one step over and she marries the next guy. Thats why the wedding vow isn't 'do you tak…
/r/MensRights19/10/19 10:55 PM
5

I've never seen her portrayed this way, and mainly attribute this portrayal to the obvious bias of the Post. She'd be wise not to play up that angle, or she comes off as Hillary II. I'd still much rather vote for her than Biden or Trump. On the other hand, Bernie has far fewer credibility issues, IMO.
/r/MensRights20/09/19 09:56 AM
0

I got slapped in the face once, at about that age, and didn't cry abuse. I just accepted it as a consequence of the fact that I was kind of a dick in high school, and said irreverent things sometimes. On the other hand, that chick did grow up to be the exact kind of psychowhore feminazi many posters are describing here, and I stopped being a dick after high school, though I am still what some might call a 'jerk', and continue to say irreverent things, but with a different motive. Is it worth it …
/r/MensRights15/09/19 05:40 PM
14

Clearly, she won't be writing any books on logic... What's even worse is when they demand STEM jobs using the same bad arguments, and I'm just like 'how are you going to survive with an irrational mind in a rational field?' And a lot of them get ferried there, anyway, and end up hating it, simply because it forces them to either be reasonable, or be wrong all the time. So it often ends up being merely another expensive tour for the privileged girl, where she ultimately produced nothing, accompli…
/r/MensRights13/09/19 03:33 PM
1

Why would anyone go to all that trouble to identify oneself, only to get shuffled to the bottom of the pile? I guess I do it simply to have hundreds of documented instances where I have invoked he/him pronouns, that way, if anyone ever implies differently, it's a hate crime! The one thing I always refuse to identify is handicap. Do I have undiagnosed mental problems? Probably. Do I want to stigmatize myself with official diagnoses? Not really.
/r/MensRights13/09/19 08:26 AM
4

The establishment, sadly, is run by prostitution and fraud, from the bottom to the top, from stick-up girls to Epstein. The only crime is righteous indignation while possessing the means to do something about it, and only then if you are male, because this is 'patriarchal sense of entitlement' to mutually amicable relationships. It's been pointed out to me, by slutty frauds themselves, they fear no reprisal, but rather, laugh at their victims, because they know they can always bribe rough men to…
/r/MensRights12/09/19 03:06 AM
0

I agree, as long as there is also a new Needless Markup property, where any player can spend money for a better player avatar, but don't get anything meaningful to the game out of it. Also, women must start out as the dog.
/r/MensRights10/09/19 06:49 PM
5

Women by far are the more sexist gender. Sex is a way of life for them. It's like the difference between owning a bar and drinking now and then. How are you supposed to fall in love with them? They expect their looks alone to drive you to take all these steps. They spend hours painting their faces and dressing themselves to this end. If you see through this melodrama and don't respond, they may taunt you, but most of them will be too cowardly to do that, and simply call you gay behind your back.…
/r/MensRights10/09/19 03:34 AM
2

It helps to follow this to its logical conclusion: they are worthless, hence you must work for them. They are net drains on society, but at the end of your life, you will be able to say 'I built _____'. You'll have a stack of accomplishments, and they'll have a stack of karmic debt. Debt is always the price of being accommodated, and instant gratification always has a price.
/r/MensRights09/09/19 02:25 PM
4

Family court judges, IME, they are no different than scenester douchebags, in that the way they operate is to always support the female at the expense of the male, and this makes them feel (and to some, appear) like heroes. But when you point out to them how this general bias is poorly applied to a particular case, a family court judge's reaction will always be suppression. It's fucked up, because they are supposed to support the abused, but IME, they often end up suppressing abused men, in cart…
/r/MensRights05/09/19 12:32 AM
3

Fun factoid: that same girl later claimed my dick was 'too small' for her, and reduced her accounts of its size by several inches, using a stolen photo of me unaroused. What a fucking sociopath. Obviously, I learned not to hook up with chicks like that, even if that's what they think they want that day.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 10:17 PM
2

My first girlfriend complained that sex hurt, and most women would describe me as average, when erect (unaroused, I look like the Statue of David, whatever). I think she just wasn't past the virgin stage, because sex didn't hurt with a lot of other guys, later... But women have been taught not to blame their own bodies or terrible judgment. 'It's always the man's fault!' Once again, feminism, and treating people like interchangeable parts, have come together to destroy men.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 10:14 PM
1

And that's like I said: she saw pictures of bodies like that, and idealized them, and in her mind that's what she wants, but in application/practice, sex with that guy is going to physically hurt, and then that will cause other pain, emotional and social, secondarily and tertiarily. For guys it's different, especially us on the smaller side, because we can fit in most women, but if our performance doesn't satisfy, it will be traumatic for us, emotionally and socially. So, just because you can fi…
/r/MensRights01/09/19 10:08 PM
1

I once had a black friend. He had a big dick, probably. His friends hooked him up with this naive college girl, and when discussing the sex they had, he complained to me that she 'couldn't take the dick'. And I'm just like 'so why are you living together'? That's ridiculous when people put eachother in these mismatched, inescapable situations, and it's really a form of rape culture.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 10:01 PM
2

And these are the same people who want me to hook up with a fat girl's cavernous mound, as a matter of convenience, to distract both of us from better fits, as if that wouldn't be traumatic and self-defeating for ME. And it's all done under the false flag of 'body-type acceptance'.
/r/MensRights01/09/19 09:57 PM
2

I mean, I live in a society where 'bigger is better' is every dumbshit's mentality. It never occurs to anyone 'Maybe Chad Thundercock will actually hurt that girl, physically, mentally, and socially', or the ever more elusive: 'Just because that guy is tall, doesn't mean he has a horse cock', or 'Just because that guy is short, doesn't mean he has a micro-penis.'
/r/MensRights01/09/19 09:51 PM
1

I stopped being self-conscious about my size a long time ago. Problem is, height is a sign stimulus that turns women on. And so they get with the tall guy, superficially, and later complain that sex 'hurts', especially with horse cock. Then they over-generalize to think sex with any man would hurt them. And it's yet another example of bad matches and misguided values creating traumatized, unhealthy people. Do the personalities/parts match up? Because if they don't, there's gonna be trauma. It's …
/r/MensRights01/09/19 09:46 PM
2

A deceptive actress is also a feminist? That's odd... /s
/r/MensRights01/09/19 12:55 AM
1

Clearly there's a slave-driving, narcissistic fascist in there, and that points to femininity!
/r/AntiFeminists29/08/19 04:40 PM
2

Every time I see this, I think of the chick who went on r/relationshipadvice, asked if it was OK if she needed a drink to relax before sex with her committed partner, and was told by many idiots she was being raped. It's like, 'Sexual repression is a thing. It's mostly from shaming and vilification exactly like this. You don't want a chick to have to drug herself just so she can break the Junior Anti-Sex League conditioning, and do what she wants to do, in her heart and mind? Stop second-guessin…
/r/MensRights28/08/19 06:52 PM
4

Don't look at her, that's what she wants!
/r/AntiFeminists28/08/19 06:11 AM
1

I hate to seriously reference SouthPark, but as Stan Marsh said: 'Rehab and support groups are a cult.' And it's obvious to the AFC from the outset, that one has to make all the concessions one would make to a cult, for an in-patient program: 'give up all your worldly possessions, live on a commune, and take the drugs we tell you to take.' After inevitably being abused and exploited by the system and its expectedly shitty conditions and uncomfortable rules, we are handed a big medical bill, and …
/r/MensRights27/08/19 04:22 PM
1

So then the question becomes: 'Who do we tax, and what do we spend it on?' And I firmly believe it's the haves who exploit the AFC, who should be taxed: the sex industry, the advertising and entertainment industries, employers, userers, landlords, and even drug dealers. But first we have to acknowledge these industries ARE exploitative, and cause damages that, if not mitigated, cause a deterioration of the social fabric. As for what we spend it on, I'm a lot more in favor of giving genuine victi…
/r/MensRights27/08/19 03:53 PM
2

The more light you shine on the male suicide issue, the more it comes to light that most suicidal men's problem is being mistreated by the people around them, and the shrink knows that the solution is not really within the patient, but all around them, and yet the shrink has no authority over the general socio-economic environment. If the shrink tries to teach the man internal coping mechanisms, the shrink could be accused of mollification or victim-blaming. If the shrink tries to embolden the p…
/r/MensRights27/08/19 01:29 PM
2

Emotionally, I'm fine. Socially and materially, I'm very depleted. The big problem was that no fewer than two of my exes went behind my back with the mob, and became involved in meth, embezzlement, prostitution, and international art thieves. When I attempted to report these crimes, I was jailed by a crooked court. In order to get these bitches out of my hair, I've basically had to turn against the entire mob, and it's no secret. This has entailed risks, austerity, and social alienation, but it'…
/r/MensRights27/08/19 07:41 AM
6

On the other hand, even as I express the general need for these services, I'm frightened of how they will be implemented. As I said before: I disagree strongly with the common idea of 'mental health', and lack faith in the ability of any agency to actually help a man keep his standard of living following a break-up. Instead, it's going to be a class on 'how to cope with communal living, because you can no longer afford a place of your very own', 'how to put all your stuff in storage right before…
/r/MensRights26/08/19 05:33 PM
9

What complete crap. There are so many traps that lay in wait for a man, or any gender really, who is right out of an abusive, exploitative, or infidelity-ridden relationship, and so little meaningful help. Within a year of suffering a terrible break-up from someone who struck me out of anger and cheated on me, I was still emotionally distraught, unable to hold a job, being catfished, slandered, and romance scammed, and the whole experience exacerbated a debilitating drug habit. This never lead t…
/r/MensRights26/08/19 05:14 PM
1

Prostitutes and promiscuous people are almost always dishonest. They say this is necessary due to social taboos surrounding their lifestyle, but the truth is that their lifestyle intrinsically requires deception, because almost no one would willfully agree to what they want. What they want is essentially more for themselves at the expense of everyone around them. They are by nature and definition swindlers.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 05:13 AM
7

Very common scam: presenting the same bill, whether valid or not, to multiple people, and thus collecting several times. Once a girl who was already pregnant tried to frame me for it, by initiating unprotected sex with me, which I stopped before it went too far. She too hit up several guys (or their parents) for abortion money. In the South, the presumption is that the male is guilty, and if all she wants is a few hundred to make it go away, pay her, and let us never speak of this again. The fac…
/r/MensRights24/08/19 04:14 PM
11

Let's not forget the many living examples of men who've bailed women out of a jam, and not only weren't acknowledged, but were victim-blamed for being exploited. I mean, a friend once told me the first lesson you learn from women is 'don't be a hero'. They're going to throw you under the bus eventually, so don't go too far out on a limb, or put too much on the table. Because they will revise history to minimize your contribution, anyway, and then everyone just thinks of you as a loser. No one, m…
/r/MensRights24/08/19 12:02 AM
1

They don't seem to realize how Dubya they are with their 'You're either with us or against us' mentality. It's like when ignorant ghetto people say 'I don't talk to police'. Trust me, if someone steals your car, you're gonna file a police report, if only for insurance purposes. They actually have a bot that will go through your posts, and see where you post most often. I got in trouble with one user because I had a thin little sliver of a percentage of posts on the red pill. But it doesn't analy…
/r/MensRights22/08/19 02:15 PM
2

Factional idealism dictates that anyone who speaks out against anything must necessarily, by definition be 'the other side'. I said something critical of a known, documented false accuser in the local news, and got accused of posting in/reading/subscribing to The_Donald. I've never done any of those things, and voted for Hillary (Though I now regret that in light of the Epstein case being vetted as real, and not 'Alex Jones fake news', as so many leftists maintained for so long). The ones who do…
/r/MensRights22/08/19 01:59 PM
2

It's as if they are attempting to create yet another terrible legal classification that can't possibly be applied to their own predatory behavior!
/r/MensRights16/08/19 02:06 PM
1

Something like that happened to me once, basically because we were two teens experimenting with drugs and sex for the first time, and then there was later some regret (on both our parts, really)... Luckily, her accusations were easy to pick apart, and everyone at my high school had witnessed our Dawson's Creek-esque, 2-year-long consent dance, and also that she moved on to become a bit of a slut in her adult life, unlike myself, so most people who knew both of us very quickly concluded that she …
/r/MensRights25/07/19 02:57 PM
1

You should take photos of any bruises and report it. I know it's emasculating to feel like a tattle-tale, but seriously, my ex struck me, out of anger, for years, and after she left, all I did was write about it, and got slapped with a protective order. So document and report, or otherwise, without evidence, a projector is going to claim you did to her everything she actually did to you.
/r/MensRights22/07/19 02:45 PM
3

I guess an expensive, environmentally friendly vehicle only appeals to idealists with broad vision, but not a bunch of petty hos.
/r/MensRights10/07/19 02:07 PM
2

I mean, read the case law. This is an actual disadvantage of international banking. Your assets aren't safe if you aren't in constant contact. Marriage certificate security is a joke. It's similar to deeds and titles. It's all authenticated by paperstock, non-computerized, and the paperstock can probably be stolen, or they can simply con whatever government into printing BS docs for them. Get some impersonator who can imitate a signature from an old credit card receipt. Read the case law history…
/r/MensRights27/06/19 08:49 PM
5

What I've found is that some 'marriages' were only on paper to begin with. Some chick affiliates herself with you for a bit, publicly, maybe there are pictures... some fraudulent paperwork gets filed, perhaps in another state, on the proper paperstock, and BOOM! She's collecting, perhaps without your knowledge, if she has a deal worked out with your employer, or if she has stolen some property of yours that generates passive income, or fiddled with the accounting, then rationalizes her posession…
/r/MensRights27/06/19 08:22 PM
1

I gotta say: size does matter, but also there is someone for everyone. I personally am not a fan of the super-huge boobs, for instance. Which isn't to say I want a chick with no boobs... I just want some regular-ass boobs!
/r/MensRights27/06/19 02:01 PM
2

I shouldn't name names, repeat potentially bogus info, or speculate, but two of my childhood friends I grew up with are commonly said to have smaller peni than mine, and they both have gotten more action than me... The reason being they are both opportunistic schmoozers, with very low standards. So really, I don't think having an appropriately-sized dick (and there is certainly such a thing as too big, as some of my black friends have told me) is all that conducive to getting the girl, now, keep…
/r/MensRights27/06/19 01:19 PM
1

Yeah well, I'm from Texas, and the women around here are just as guilty of feeding Christians to the lions. And I haven't ruled out it's just the culture of my Babylon-esque state. But people around here say 'It's the same everywhere' and 'Wherever you go, you'll still be there'. False consensus and victim-blaming are quite common around here. I always say they send evil morons from everywhere here, because it is assumed they will fit in here.
/r/MensRights27/06/19 12:57 PM
7

I'm constantly surprised about how naive women are about penis size. They make all these jokes about us not being able to find their clits, but most of them wouldn't be able to match up a flaccid penis with its erect state. They look at a photo like this, and assume a guy like that couldn't satisfy them. I like to give him the benefit of the doubt, and say it's totally plausible he has a respectable-sized dick. Maybe not porn-star dick, but most women don't want that anyway, anymore than most me…
/r/MensRights27/06/19 06:12 AM
0

I used to think I was depressed. As it turns out, people suck, and being sad because people suck is not a mental illness. Most of my exes (or their lovers) have defrauded me, one way or another. I wrote about this, and was legally punished for it, in a very stereotypical case of restraining order abuse. But it's like I was telling someone: the only crime in a kleptocracy is outrage over being robbed, and you can either be a potentially violent asshole, or a benevolent schmuck, in reaction, and e…
/r/MensRights26/06/19 03:24 PM
44

They figure the mental hospital was all the help he needed, as if a nasty, stainless-steel-and-concrete dungeon, where they forcefully inject malcontents full of thorazine aqnd haloperidol is 'helping'. The shitty thing is, talking about your problems is more likely to attract ridicule, and perhaps even punishment on top of injury, than it is to get you any meaningful help.
/r/MensRights26/06/19 12:25 PM
-3

The one white kid in the group: 'What did you learn at school today, honey?' 'Big said either you're slingin crack rock, or you got a wicked jump shot.'
/r/MensRights23/06/19 09:48 AM
2

What a manipulative cunt! Why are these cases always filed under 'boys will be boys', instead of 'hamsters will be hamsters'?
/r/MensRights17/04/19 12:31 AM
1

I hate to put anything that might help someone under a general umbrella of 'bullshit programs'. I acknowledge the government can do good. I worked in a federal datacenter for JobCorps. It wasn't the best gig I ever had, in fact the facilities were a little dingy, but I did go from simple scripting to a more object-oriented approach there, and I'm sure I helped some less fortunate people in the process. On the other hand, I also consider $1 Trillion/year on military spending to be a colossal wast…
/r/MGTOW07/04/19 05:26 AM
1

I am not for the legalization of prostitution. I am for the legalization of some recreational drugs, and the psychiatric administration of some drugs thought to have no medical value.
/r/MGTOW07/04/19 01:20 AM
-2

Didn't Biggie Smalls and a bunch of rappers brag about robbery, and yet they were considered 'cool' or 'oh that's just what they had to do to survive'? Not saying that makes this right, just saying, let's not abandon intellectual honesty just to play gotcha. Personally, I don't like robbers. I've been robbed by someone who was a self-confessed emulator of C Murda, and I obviously didn't appreciate it. It's a shady way to get by. Omar Little is the bottom rung of the ladder, someone you fear enco…
/r/MensRights27/03/19 11:06 PM
2

'PRISM should only bother you if you have something to hide.' 'Prejudice against Muslims should only bother you if you are a terrorist.' I wonder how many liberal feminists would agree with statements like that?
/r/MensRights14/02/19 07:01 PM
3

If you ask me, the world is a creepy place, and the people who are allowed to exist in this bubble that enables them to pretend it isn't are quite privileged. When women complain that someone is 'creepy', what they are really complaining about is that their little echo chamber of privilege is being compromised by reality.
/r/MensRights04/01/19 02:07 AM
2

Though I've always been and continue to be the kind of person who refuses to get the police involved, unless it is 100% necessary and helpful to do so, I do admit it's sometimes handy to have official records of habitual patterns of abuse perpetrated by others against oneself. Who knows? It might keep you out of jail, keep you from paying hefty civil judgments, or help you win a custody battle...
/r/MensRights14/12/18 09:51 PM
1

Can't tell if it's serious or satyrical.
/r/MensRights08/12/18 09:35 AM
2

Of course, they say this is justified by opinions I have... But they influenced the experiences that created those opinions, most certainly.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 03:01 PM
2

And in fact, you might even say these people are intimately connected with people from my hometown, who have been doing this to me for 20+ years! With little consequence to them. In fact, they've probably benefitted from my unnecessary suffering!
/r/MensRights05/12/18 03:00 PM
3

Anyway, you'd be surprised how common these kinds of hypocritical pretenses are around here, even from the pimps, players, and pushers of the underworld, creating a truly dangerous and toxic situation for Yours Truly, from the mainstream and underground at once.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 02:54 PM
5

In fact, this kind of social trauma might even drive me to DRUG ABUSE, which I've had problems with, been busted, and done time for in the past.
/r/MensRights05/12/18 02:51 PM
6

Of course, not wanting to be accused of playing 'why don't you and them fight', I simply ask the like-minded to consider what it might be like for me to have to deal, not just in internet land, but locally, with these kind of manipulative, biased, sexist cretins, who can slander and threaten me all they want, incite me, and I might actually encounter them, they might hit me, and I might go to jail, for doing absolutely nothing wrong, as has already happened to me historically, with them and thei…
/r/MensRights05/12/18 02:45 PM
5

Austin resident here. I got in a really nasty argument about this with some other Austin residents, in the Austin subreddit, and it got into all kinds of ad hominems from people with indefensible positions. Check it out! https://www.reddit.com/r/Austin/comments/a23l9p/justice_lady_who_made_a_fake_report_that_could/
/r/MensRights05/12/18 12:16 PM
1

'Oh Cliff! Sometimes it must be difficult not to feel as if You really are a cliff When fascists keep trying to push you over it! Are they the lemmings, or are you Cliff? Or ARE you, Cliff?' -Rik
/r/MensRights28/11/18 02:39 PM
7

I love her cave-woman response: 'this make my head hurt, ooga-booga'
/r/MensRights21/11/18 12:05 AM
3

Female craziness has driven me to asceticism and isolationism for several long periods of my life. It usually takes an attractive and reasonable-seeming woman to bring me back down off Mount Guru, but those are few and far between, and they usually have a sense of entitlement to a wealthier, more attractive man than I.
/r/MensRights20/11/18 12:31 PM
3

I would absolutely love to see a female collective appropriate all of his wealth, and give him an allowance of say, $50k a year. See how he likes that. All that Star Wars money is now going to women's shelters. All those convention hos who used to be all up on your nuts, they don't need your money no more, nor do you even have that money they once coveted. Let's see how being a regular schmuck might affect a celebrity's pretentious attitude about social politics.
/r/MensRights14/11/18 11:16 PM
6

LetHerDie2018
/r/MensRights10/11/18 10:42 AM
40

Personally, I never look through a person's post history beyond a rare casual glance, and that's usually because I like what they posted, and want to see if they posted anything else upvoteworthy. But for some people, when you say something they don't agree with, and yet they can't refute it, they get really desperate to make you look bad, so they go through your post history, only so they can mock you about what you posted on a support forum, and drag that into a totally unrelated discussion. I…
/r/MensRights06/11/18 11:34 PM
3

Gee, it's almost as if there's so much repressed melodrama surrounding sex, some people actually need something for their anxiety, just to have a sex life, even if they are in an intentional committed relationship. Maybe that's at least in small part because of all the false allegation rape witch hunts that happen constantly!
/r/MensRights01/11/18 04:15 PM
2

Finally, and I hate to use this argument, because it's stereotypical within the industry, but sometimes people who are major contributors to a project early on get to rest on their laurels a bit, because what they built was so valuable, it made the company far more than that company actually compensated them for. And then that company took that money, and hired a bunch of help for him, but kept him on the payroll out of respect, and also because he might be a brain on tap, to guide new employees…
/r/MensRights31/10/18 04:02 PM
3

I also very strongly feel that a lot of managers in executive boardrooms waste a lot more time than I do, and are better compensated than me. They have lots of meetings about what we are supposed to engineer, and sometimes they hand us orders, right, and halfway through doing what they've asked for, they completely change their minds about what they want, so we have to scrap what we've done and start over. And let's just say you work on an assembly line of sorts, and any number of things can mak…
/r/MensRights31/10/18 03:48 PM
5

I can relate, though... I used to work in a dingy, government building with all the ports and IPs blocked, but then I once again escaped to the private sector of foosball tables, company gyms, in-office yoga classes, etc... I still think I work harder than most Google employees. I've heard they work about 2-3 hours a day, when accommodating for flex time, company happy hours, sensitivity training seminars, and all that jazz.
/r/MensRights31/10/18 02:52 PM
1

I still maintain that if someone is not as engaged with their work as management wants them to be, management should gently confront them about it, and also the people around them. Productive person should spur unproductive person, or maybe explain something to them. 'See what I'm doing here? Now you understand that. I just wrote a unit test. See if you can come up with some more variables for that test. You have to use a harness we have set up thusly.' But if someone is allowed to wallow in ali…
/r/MensRights31/10/18 02:25 PM
4

Why so authoritarian? Too repressed to be an authentic human? I heard that happens to people who get involved with authoritarian power structures.
/r/MensRights31/10/18 02:07 PM
1

Sounds spooky!
/r/MensRights31/10/18 02:06 PM
47

I think most people surf the web at work, and it's shitty when companies start witch-hunts about that, especially if cyberslackers are meeting or exceeding the expectations of their day-to-day duties, given the relevant proprietary training. Too often I have seen that protectionism and elitism keep some people trapped in silos, or roles where they aren't doing all that they could, leaving them with too much free time they end up using to surf. Then when it comes time to downsize or cut costs, th…
/r/MensRights31/10/18 11:29 AM
2

It's almost as if quality of education is based on social privilege, and the ability to elicit empathy from others, and women might have an unacknowledged advantage in all that...
/r/MensRights31/10/18 09:16 AM
1

Go on r/anarchism and comment something similar to this op. They will ban you. So will r/socialism, and even r/LibertarianSocialism! These aren't communist states. They are grassroots forum communities.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 07:56 PM
14

Can confirm. No matter how sarcastic or satyrical your intentions in making such a statement, this quote will likely be taken out of context and used against you, in court at a later date, by some deliberately obtuse phony, with ulterior motives.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 07:46 PM
1

Censorship and ostracism are load-bearing pillars of every socialist movement. Just look at China! Just as the right is dependent upon a police state, to guard the haves from the have-nots, so is the left dependent upon police-state policies, to quash political dissent.
/r/MensRights26/10/18 07:27 PM
6

She's mad because he wasted her time? Far as I know, there is no #WasteHerTime2018 movement. LoL
/r/MensRights18/10/18 03:09 PM
6

Women can live with the illusion of independence as long as they turn their sycophants against the rest of the men. Then they implement welfare state or private sector diversity policies that are essentially powered by male feminists robbing the rest of mankind. But that's not actual independence. It's dependence on slavery.
/r/MensRights03/10/18 11:56 PM
8

This from a site where women lie about their age, number of sexual partners in their past, and use photoshopped avatars from 10 years ago. Way to be a standing joke, online dating apps.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 07:12 PM
1

So this guy just finally learned that women are petty power-mongers, and can accuse anyone of anything, for the dumbest reasons. Which is why we have rights of the accused and burden of proof.
/r/MensRights30/09/18 05:53 PM
0

I would be suspicious of her claims even without the background... She looks like an old man. Who would do that? I mean, I think a rapist would pick a more attractive target. You'd really have to be desperate and depraved to risk prison for that face. It's a laughable idea... I might believe her if the person she accused was blind or retarded. LoL
/r/MensRights27/09/18 01:32 PM
5

The whole practice of modern advertising is actually getting beautiful and popular women to repeat men's lies, in order to sell shit. A spiel the public wouldn't buy from a man, they'll totally buy from an attractive woman. Again, this is the basis of much contemporary marketing: put a man's words in a woman's mouth, so people will at least humor them, and quite possibly, fully imbibe the Kool-Aid, just because a pretty face is serving it.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 06:49 AM
2

I suspect this is a classic example of the worst offender insecurely leading the crusade: https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=biden+touching+children+compilation
/r/MensRights22/09/18 11:53 AM
1

Honestly, I think 90% of the silver screen is crap. I have not seen ANY of this year's blockbusters. Black Panther, Infinity War, new Super Troopers, none of that shit. Cinema is so fake and cheesy to me, I don't respect it, or most of the people who go... If a movie is really good, I download it or catch it on cable. The theatre is also uncomfortable. I prefer the comfort of my own place, where I can imbibe various substances without ushers interfering.
/r/MensRights18/09/18 01:36 PM
5

I finally saw this for the first time on cable a few weeks ago. I was like: 'OMG, I relate to this so much! Why didn't I know about this?' My friends: 'Dude, it was nominated for Academy Awards... why are you so behind on pop culture?' Me: 'Uhhh... no one to go to the movies with...?'
/r/MensRights17/09/18 04:45 PM
3

That's absolutely disgusting. I get really sick of so-called 'mental health professionals' abusing their patients' trust. It's so unprofessional. I've been accused of doing this by someone who was actually doing it. So it seems like those who do this ultimately always fall back on projection... It's the last pathway in their reptile minds, when all other options have been exhausted. Mind you, I have sold pot and done guided sessions with psychedelics... but never with minors or intentions of sex…
/r/MensRights11/09/18 03:05 PM
1

Why would a goddess need money? LoL
/r/MGTOW06/07/18 11:52 AM
1

Bah-dup-bah-bah-bah!
/r/MGTOW05/07/18 04:55 PM
5

Why isn't this a toxic rant about Incels? Oh yeah, women don't have to put up with that.
/r/MGTOW30/06/18 02:53 PM
14

I'm glad a book like this has been written. I'm not super-happy with the execution. If I were going to write on this topic, the female rapist would be more of a deceiver, back-stabber, social climber, sexual demagogue. I'm actually something of a believer in the concept of 'rape by dishonesty', so in the same way a man pretends to be rich with a rented Benz/wardrobe/high credit card balance, a woman says she loves you and will be there in sickness and health, then when you hit dire straits, she …
/r/MensRights25/06/18 12:29 PM
2

I prefer a woman who's hard to get, actually. Easy-come/easy-go is only appealing to the novice. Lord knows, I am NOT easy to get myself.
/r/MGTOW24/06/18 04:29 AM
2

'Anti-social' is yet another one of these terms with an elastic definition that every generation tries to revise. In my day, it was considered anti-social to sleep around, manipulate people, and seek positions of self-serving influence over others. These days, if you haven't had a girlfriend in awhile, people accuse you of plotting another Incel terrorist attack. This is especially frustrating for me because, in a time when I was young and just trying to have some fun, I was labelled a 'psychopa…
/r/MGTOW23/06/18 04:57 PM
6

In the same way that teachers must never be alone with a child student, men can never be alone with women in a business context. No one would fault a female teacher for refusing to be alone with a male student, for her own safety from rape or false allegations.
/r/MGTOW23/06/18 02:51 PM
5

I would have said '3 on 1 is a rape threat, to me', or a potential false allegation democrat scam. 'Either all 3 of them are lying, or you're lying, Occam's razor, blah blah blah...'
/r/MGTOW23/06/18 02:49 PM
10

Finally, can anyone say 'gaslighting'? I got out of the 'bitterness' stage about 2 years after my last GF left. Now I'm independent, confident, and not about to settle for bottom bitches. That's the thing though, I go out some nights and these dudebros come up like I'm Mitch Kramer from 'Dazed and Confused': 'Who you fuckin tonight, freshman?' (I'm actually 37, but look much younger) I take a look around, 'To tell you the truth, no one here really strikes my fancy all that much.' Laughter from d…
/r/MGTOW18/06/18 06:33 PM
18

It's a true sign of the PC Principal-esque merger between obnoxious SJWs and 'good, old-fashioned' jock-on-nerd bullying... They've actually rhetorically found a way to tease you for having an unsatisfying sex life, while at the same time claiming to be 'progressive'... And the Tumblrinas they're trying to impress fall hook, line, and sinker for this sexist doublethink, because to them, it's not sexism if it doesn't affect them.
/r/MGTOW18/06/18 04:32 PM
22

Experienced this recently with a grand-standing facebook white knight, who I suspect is far more toxic than I've ever even contemplated being. This guy almost certainly knows for a fact that I've turned down a handful of women in the club scene where he is a DJ, simply because they aren't my type/I don't want to get caught up with them... So how does 'unhappy with known options' equate to 'can't get laid'? It doesn't. These are betas in demeaning relationships, who seek to demean independent men…
/r/MGTOW18/06/18 03:16 PM
11

Take it from a former drug dealer, who used to have dozens of 'friends' stop by every day: popularity is over-rated.
/r/MGTOW15/06/18 05:54 PM
1

I'd say she shouldn't be confined to a promiscuous class over her background, but then I remember they do that to us over a mere handful of partners. This girl has 60+ in one year, probably like 10x more than me in total, a man almost twice her age. Maybe some gigolo who wants to retire can marry her, but for a guy like me, it wouldn't be fair at all.
/r/MGTOW14/06/18 02:16 PM
3

confirmed case of death by female exploitation of someone who was obviously in love with her. This is why I never think 'Oh, I could have slept with her, if only I'd done more for her.' Nah, that jewelry or whatever would have only made her look nicer on her date with Chad.
/r/MGTOW04/06/18 03:22 PM
2

And these women seriously wonder why, at some point in their lives, THEY are the ones to get victim-blamed.... SMDH violent crimes are triggered by social and financial crimes
/r/MGTOW03/06/18 04:26 PM
-2

I'm not partial to black girls, but for the record, I think she looks good in both photographs. Women look different without their make-up. Some of them look better under all that than others. Some of them look better under their clothes than others. All part of the mysteries of dating, LoL
/r/MGTOW26/05/18 12:14 PM
1

I'll take a Louis the 13th and Sprite, with some purple Kool-Aid powder thrown in. That's my order when someone else payin'
/r/MGTOW22/05/18 11:43 PM
1

Does that mean girls are actually the ones who go to Jupiter?
/r/MGTOW19/05/18 05:53 PM
4

Maybe women feel more entitled to borrow, or are more short-sighted. My goal was to graduate college with no debt, and I actually graduated with five figures in the bank, simply from being enterprising. The idea of becoming a 'professional student', despite being thought of as highly acclimated to that path, simply chafed against my idea of what kind of life I should lead.
/r/MGTOW09/05/18 01:11 PM
1

And a lot of people say, 'Don't you think it's for the benefit of society that women have these safety nets and comforts?' Sure. I also think it's for the benefit of society that individual males are not so alienated from the benefits of society, and included in the costs, that they snap from anger and go on rampages that kill random civilians, rampages I myself or anyone here might very well end up victims of. And this is only going to increase in occurrence, for it is a direct consequence of m…
/r/MGTOW29/04/18 10:26 PM
4

To be clear: I'm not advocating for some kind of government system that forces women to have sex with men. In fact, even if such a system DID exist, I would have very little faith in it, to provide me with a mate that meets my personal standards. What I'm arguing is, women have already implemented a system that directly robs men of time and money to pay for things like alimony, child support, maternity leave, female healthcare burdens, etc... With government guns in our backs. And the end result…
/r/MGTOW29/04/18 10:20 PM
3

But they are in fact, preserving their right to control the gene pool. Which is essentially, Social Darwinism, and clearly shows their one-sided, paper-thin commitment to liberal ideals. In the case of maternity leave, the case you're making is literally this: Society doesn't owe men sex, but men owe society for the consequences of SOMEONE ELSE'S SEX LIFE. So basically, men are expected to solely bear the entire burden of social conscience. This is why I hate modern liberals. They take away all …
/r/MGTOW29/04/18 10:15 PM
13

I'm just shocked she admits she needs a man...
/r/MGTOW28/04/18 02:56 PM
8

If she wants to live in a society where men are that desperate, she should move to Japan, and stock their vending machines. No one deifies female garbage here.
/r/MGTOW26/04/18 01:51 PM
3

Always remember that compromise carries a high opportunity cost, socially and emotionally. Really think about what your ideal type is, pursue them with confidence, and reject all others.
/r/MGTOW25/04/18 08:58 PM
2

Redpill is about deceiving others MGTOW is about not caring enough what others think to even put in that effort.
/r/MGTOW25/04/18 06:13 PM
2

The reality: the world is a WORSE place because it already IS run by women.
/r/MGTOW24/04/18 11:53 PM
8

This is the shit that pisses me off because in the next breath, either them or one of their friends is blathering on about 'don't perpetuate rape culture' and I'm like: You or someone in your group just did that. so frustrating
/r/MGTOW20/04/18 04:29 AM
17

I actually think that's a classy way to handle it. I'v heard there are dating forums for people with specific STDs, and that's an important thing to exist, even though I don't personally need it. It's funny because you think getting an STD would cut you off from people, and it probably does, but it could actually open new doors to other people, LoL As a clean person though, I admit these kinds of things are totally unappetizing, and I would never accept that from a potential partner. The idea of…
/r/MGTOW18/04/18 01:03 PM
2

Note the Texas tattoo, LoL
/r/MGTOW07/04/18 03:09 PM
6

Happened to Phil Hartman...
/r/MGTOW06/04/18 10:25 PM
2

I'm tempted to say 'all black people are generalizers', but that would be sinking to her level...
/r/MGTOW03/04/18 05:06 PM
3

I was once told by a family court judge: 'If you wanted fidelity, you should have married her.' (As if an empty ceremonial ritual would have changed her basic psychological make-up), and yet he and others in various communities also applied many of the consequences of divorce to me, so I just started calling it a common-law divorce. I mean, chicks these days will go behind your back, get phony marriage papers, and then go try to tap your foreign bank accounts, if you're well-off enough to have a…
/r/MGTOW31/03/18 11:36 AM
1

That's why you gotta be 'a pimp, not a simp'
/r/MGTOW02/03/18 04:46 PM
2

Yeah I'm probably about 20 years younger than you. My longest relationship was 4.5 years, and ended in all kinds of betrayals on her part. I hope to get married someday, but past experience has acquainted me with the concept of opportunity cost. So that's mostly why I'm MGTOW: I've learned there are good women and bad, and the bad ones keep you from the good ones, often whether you get too involved with them or not. I do see the extreme end of the MGTOW spectrum as very similar to fish/bicycle r…
/r/MGTOW01/03/18 07:22 PM
3

I agree with most of what you wrote... I do think 'wife goggles' can be a good thing, you know, and there are situations where 'body-type acceptance' and 'unrealistic standards of beauty' rhetoric is applicable. No one looks their best when they have aged, and some people should 'stay in their league' if cursed with bad genetics, but at the same time, it takes a strong physical attraction to initiate the kind of emotional bond that makes us tolerate our partner's aging, which is why I encourage …
/r/MGTOW01/03/18 06:03 PM
4

I've met some smart women in my life, and some who were highly accomplished, academically and professionally. To suggest that these don't exist only fuels accusations that our cause is intrinsically biased. It's no different than feminists saying all men are pigs.
/r/MGTOW01/03/18 03:13 PM
2

Well there's your answer tot he 'get a dog' argument...
/r/MGTOW01/03/18 03:02 PM
3

At the risk of being contrary, I would say it's impolite to presume that physical beauty is all women have to offer the world... However, it is all some women have, and the ones who do have more to offer, that might still not be enough to entice men into romance with them. As the song goes 'I can't put my dick in your college degree.'
/r/MGTOW01/03/18 02:08 PM
1

It's because, mannnn... They know that they know what they know. Y'know?
/r/MGTOW26/02/18 10:44 PM
1

Because for many of them, it's the only power they have cultivated within themselves, as many of them have short-sightedly believed, that's all they would ever need.
/r/MGTOW26/02/18 03:38 PM
4

It's all the happy, satisfied, socially accommodated people, who want the whole world to learn of their peaceful ways... BY FORCE!
/r/MGTOW20/02/18 01:06 PM
7

Of course. Breaking up people's marriages and turning everyone into sluts has always been their obvious, greasy douchebag agenda.
/r/MGTOW19/02/18 02:20 PM
1

We are. It's called a 'prostate exam'.
/r/MensRights18/02/18 01:38 PM
3

Not only that, when women are promiscuous, it's 'liberation', but when men are promiscuous it's 'exploitation'...
/r/MGTOW06/02/18 01:43 PM
3

her: 'Let's just be friends' me: 'You're a terrible friend, though.' on to the next one, never see that one again. Describes 90% of relationships with women.
/r/MGTOW05/02/18 10:29 PM
2

nice one, bruv!
/r/MGTOW24/01/18 10:34 PM
13

Her saying that forcing others to pay a price is equivalent to her paying a price is basically an implicit acknowledgment that men are slaves to her.
/r/MensRights22/11/17 08:52 PM
12

So don't live in fear. Find happiness in hobbies that improve a skill. Make money. Eat well. Do up some really good dope. I've got a criminal record because a woman ratted me out for growing dope. i'm still pretty happy. You've simply reached the age where you realize most women aren't worth their drama, that's all. Congrats. And don't let them shame you for your past. Most of theirs, even the ones significantly younger than you, probably have much worse things in their pasts than you, so it's a…
/r/MGTOW17/11/17 04:07 PM
1

I am aware of the shaming tactics of both sides of the spectrum, and how manipulative that is. However, a completely non-judgmental society will always be a race to the bottom. As someone who considers himself accountable to God, I feel compelled to not entangle myself in bad karma. If that makes me look foolish to you, as one of these 'fucked over decent men' of whom you speak, then so be it. At least I'm not part of the problem, and sympathize with those who 'fuck themselves' by refusing to be…
/r/MensRights15/11/17 07:04 PM
1

It seems like some people are going to a lot of trouble to rationalize not being a decent fucking person.
/r/MensRights15/11/17 05:55 AM
0

'our house' (but not mine)? Now who's being exclusionary?
/r/MensRights14/11/17 07:05 PM
0

Yeah that's right. I don't like TRP. And I don't think shame would work on them. That assumes they have a conscience. I think TRPers are the most transparently emotionless psychos on the internet. Big whup, wanna fight about it? Furthermore, the PC SJW movement is just as much about guilt trippery as any church. we all know that. Can't trust either side, man, they're all out to undermine your self confidence, and get you to compromise, whether that means accepting the skank, the idiot, or the fu…
/r/MensRights14/11/17 06:34 PM
1

That's the thing is that it's actually quite easy for men with no standards to be sluts. There are desperate women out there. But what if you have standards? what if you don't want to be a slut? Well, you better be wealthy, then, because happy marriage is a class privilege, and women make it so, and all that is their part in rape culture, IMO. So I guess that's the difference between MGTOW and Incel: I imagine incels to be these socially anxious late teens/early 20's kind of people who want to g…
/r/MensRights14/11/17 12:46 PM
0

Adding further evidence to the point that these liberal SJWs are Stalinist revisionists, deliberately miscategorizing others.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 12:36 PM
0

See, this all seems like non-judgemental hoodoo to me. Kind of like when my friend refused to sort his recycling out, but then I remembered that I drive a gas guzzler, so what can I really say to him, you know? So the end result is: overflowing landfills and pollution for everyone. Also, you say 'what's good for the goose is good for the gander', but of course 'good' is a relatively subjective term here. And no, tampons aren't good for men.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 12:17 PM
1

What I'm actually saying is 'The upper socio-economic class is sucking up the most desirable opportunities, leaving the rest of us with undesirable opportunities, over which many of us willfully pick nothing.' Women, who tend to fall victim to groupthink and other typical trappings of democratic socialism, look at an under-watered plant and think, 'You don't deserve water.' Instead, they keep watering the over-watered plant because, 'look how well it's doing.' And yes, a person who has everythin…
/r/MensRights14/11/17 12:12 PM
2

I came to it independently, but I'm sure it's been said before.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 08:49 AM
0

Don't you understand the concept of 'don't stoop to their level'? How about 'race to the bottom'?
/r/MensRights14/11/17 08:48 AM
3

More projection.
/r/MensRights14/11/17 03:23 AM
2

There are good men and bad men, just like there are good women and bad women. I make no claims of being the only good one out there. In fact, at times I've been somewhat bad myself. But it's easy to drive someone to bad behavior: break their heart, take away everything they've earned, give it to someone undeserving, and throw them in a cage. The government does it all the time.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 11:52 PM
3

Dude, I know redpillers in real life, and that's really what they do. The gluttony of one starves many. If you ask me, that forum is far more toxic than Incel ever was, and it's typical of liberal sexists to ban the victims and not the victim-blamers.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 06:37 PM
0

See I find this post to be kinda fallacy of excluded middle. Not all Christians are anti-sex or even anti-abortion. There are liberal churches. Conversely, liberal feminism is a ball women can run with in any direction. Feminists can be frigid or slutty, and use feminism to rationalize it either way.
/r/MGTOW13/11/17 06:24 PM
2

All I know is that when I express my desire to either marry the hottest chick on Earth or die alone, most Christian Conservatives are like 'right on'. The liberal atheists, on the other hand, well they come out with all the arguments I list in this blog. Now, I agree with the liberals about a lot of other shit, and disagree with the conservatives about a lot of other shit, but on this one issue, the liberals are on attack, and the conservatives got my back.
/r/MGTOW13/11/17 04:52 PM
2

Well yeah... not to mention the inherent classism of capitalism in general. See this is why I don't get along with either side: I'm somewhat financially liberal, and somewhat socially conservative. So I guess I'm 'literally Hitler'. I mean, I voted for Bernie, but somehow I'm still 'literally Hitler' to both sides.
/r/MGTOW13/11/17 04:49 PM
1

I mean in Austin, it's a very budding liberal town. Their understanding of liberal social politics here is pretty rudimentary. The con-artists generally keep liberals down as a side effect of conning all the bleeding hearts, like the kid selling chocolate for his 'inner city basketball team'.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 02:44 PM
3

I'm actually NOT alt-right... I supported Bernie in the primaries, Hillary in the general election. But I do live in a college town, and am subject to all the immature pseudo-liberal BS you could possibly imagine.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 11:36 PM
-1

So what? Are you saying the Left shouldn't be criticized, ever? What would Voltaire think of that?
/r/MensRights12/11/17 11:29 PM
1

it's a tired old ego game. 'If you were a real man, you'd ask me to dinner at your expense.' The fact that society enables women to be so transparently selfish and evil is what sends all the good men running away, and the women won't realize they are wrong until they are old and unattractive.
/r/MensRights31/10/17 08:50 PM
7

I always tell my fellow Americans: the cure for your liberal idealism can usually be found in studying the social and economic histories of European countries.
/r/MGTOW20/09/17 02:59 PM
5

I once met this chick in college. She was casually banging a friend of mine, who I regularly sold pot to. Anyway, I guess it's because she considered both of us kinda low-level criminals, but she confided in us about running this scam of getting office jobs, deliberately leading some AFC on, and then once he'd made himself look bad on tape or in print, suing the company for sexual harassment. She had done this like 3 or 4 times, and had averaged in the low five figures per settlement. Once she r…
/r/MGTOW23/08/17 03:03 PM
3

The last two are what piss me off the most: So basically, women get a pass on their history, whether it's important to the guy they are currently with or not. It's like if you were financing a new car and said to the bank: 'Don't ask about my credit. It's rude.' Or if the car dealer said: 'Don't ask if this car has ever been in a collision. That's rude.'
/r/MensRights22/08/17 04:32 PM
0

Also, since high school, I have been in a few non-Dawson's-Creek-esque relationships with adult women, including a five-year live-in with a woman most would think of as an 8 or a 9, besides the fact that she was pretty flat (boob job would totally rectify that, for the type of men who don't mind fake boobs). What I figured out is that hot girls mistreat you because they are spoiled, and ugly girls mistreat you because they are insecure. The best women are well-adjusted. Psychical attractiveness …
/r/TheRedPill19/07/17 05:22 PM
1

I went MGTOW just because I know from experience the inevitable consequences of picking from bad options (and most options are bad). In high school, I was a nerd, wasn't on sports teams, wasn't classically 'cool' (some would argue I was alterna-cool, the type to be in a garage band), did drugs, parents didn't give me a lot of money, a little bit runty. So I'm non-verbally told, by the high school social hierarchy 'These are your options': B-grade chicks. It's either that, or graduate high school…
/r/TheRedPill19/07/17 05:07 PM
15

TIL, single men who provide for themselves (and often others as well) aren't really men, because they derive no benefit from the labors of others, and have no privileges over anyone. Also TIL some people are so hopelessly dependent, they couldn't imagine such a person existing, and if they encountered one, they would insecurely hurl false accusations at him.
/r/MensRights19/07/17 01:45 PM
3

I kind of disagree... In more capitalistic societies, women end up either prostitutes or in sham relationships, because they are dependent on men, as individuals. But theoretically, in a socialized society, women are free to hook up for more idealistic reasons. Also, this article ignores the fact that women are graduating at a higher rate than men, and single women without children (career girls) actually out-earn men the same age, statistically.
/r/MGTOW27/06/17 04:54 PM
1

Where I'm from, a federal Pell grant will cover the cost of state school tuition, but for the first 2 years, you can collect this amount even if you are going to a community college, which costs about 1/10th, leaving you the rest to spend at your discretion for those 2 years. My parents were affluent, so I didn't qualify for this. The government assumes that affluent parents actually take care of their kids, but mine were pretty negligent. The amount they spent on my education was less than the …
/r/MGTOW23/06/17 06:58 PM
3

Grants/Parental assistance (most students get one or the other, and a few get both) and a part-time job/side business should be enough to get through college when you are young and can easily pull off 12-hour days. I graduated with no debt, never got a Pell grant, and the amount of money my parents gave me for college was actually less than a Pell grant. Immigrants' kids on financial aid had more money than I did in college, but I graduated with thousands in savings, because I worked hard in my …
/r/MGTOW23/06/17 04:41 PM
0

Honestly, the older (and more experienced) you get, the less important it is. The people who make a big deal out of it just seem immature. And there are too many games/drama associated with it. Society constantly under-estimates your value, and tries to get you to settle for less, and when you refuse, they call you 'gay'... It's infantile chatter, and eventually you disregard this cacophony of ignorance. And then the rare bird that actually inspires desire in you comes along, and tries to use yo…
/r/TheRedPill22/06/17 03:24 PM
2

Yup. It's basically a tragedy of the commons thing, where the space that is intended to be for everyone very quickly becomes the turf of socially established cliques. The hypocrisy that those cliques claim to be liberally inclusive only makes it more infuriating... Because in the name of including a statistical minority, they are actually excluding the majority. In the past, certain drugs would actually break down the competitive mentality, but those drugs are less and less available in a survei…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 08:01 PM
2

This all re-affirms two faults of liberal ideologies: Non-judgmentalism is actually repressive of critical thinkers, and promotes stagnation. Even if you form an opinion over time, in the open-minded, non-snap judgment way, you are still expected by mob groupthink to repress that opinion, or your dissent will be punished with ostracism. In a non-judgmental community, there is always someone worse than you who is accepted, so there is no incentive to improve yourself. 'Progress' for the tradition…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 05:18 PM
2

Basically, the club used to be a designated place for the socially unincorporated... In other words: you're single again, go out to the club, get inebriated, make some new friends, get some numbers. But when these progressive-minded idealists socially take that space over, they actually make things terrible for the socially unincorporated males, while at the same time letting single females rule the roost... no matter the merits or detriments of either side. Which is really terrible, because soc…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 04:53 PM
2

Fair warning: your short question has a long answer. I was in the nightclub business for several years, pre- and post- 9-11, and there have been drastic changes, not really in ownership or management, but just culturally. And don't get me wrong: there have always been pretentious clubs that focused on 'exclusivity'. Models have always been stuck up. But my point is simply that the neighborhood or downtown night spot used to be where the guy next door and the girl next door hooked up, because the…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 04:30 PM
1

My point is that the same PC/SJW culture that's so popular among amateur tumblr models, you know, the pretentious kind of suburbanite who emulates Hollywood phonies, it's actually been terrible for the nightclub business. If a guy thinks the girls who go to his neighborhood watering hole are stuck up like that, what's the point of paying $5+ for drinks? The nightlife is intrinsically sexist, and yet there is this constant wave of SJW idealists who try to 'clean it up', and they kill these busine…
/r/MensRights20/06/17 01:29 PM
1

Not only that, but they will frequently assert that men who are unhappy have a 'victim complex'. If you could imagine the person with a gourmet dinner complaining about it anyway, but then when they meet someone who lives on PB&J's who is unhappy, 'You need to stop playing the victim card.' In other words, more projection.
/r/MGTOW19/06/17 07:32 PM
15

When it's just one person, these kinds of thinkers are just alienated weirdos, but its never just one person because these people can't think for themselves. That's why they are doomed to think in generalities and stereotypes, while at the same time condemning a handful of TOKEN generalities and stereotypes, just to prove that they don't always think in generalities and stereotypes. The kinds of communities these people build always have really fucked up people at the helm. I've noticed this wit…
/r/MensRights19/06/17 02:19 PM
7

50 years ago, it was Hollywood and New York City stealing all the perfect 10's from the small towns where they were raised by poor people they ultimately snubbed. The internet and 'globalism' might make this easier, but it's always been happening in one form or another.
/r/MGTOW16/06/17 02:19 PM
5

In the beginning, as you are learning the ropes, and building skills, it's OK to get paid in experience, but depending on how fast you learn, this will quickly turn into you being exploited. Know what you are worth on the open market, and don't take less than that. If you are better than average at your job, demand more. Always keep abreast of all attainable opportunities on your radar. Interview all the time. Often, you will have to change companies to get the raise you deserve. Don't sell your…
/r/TheRedPill15/06/17 06:33 PM
1

It's the 'Kiss Hello' episode all over again! LoL
/r/MGTOW07/06/17 02:22 PM
8

Typical female projection of their own faults onto males. The reason for the 'marriage crisis' in this generation is that women are inherently privileged, socially, they go mad with power until they get old, and then they aren't hot anymore, have too much mileage/baggage, and no one considers them marriage material. For a middle-aged man who worked his way through college and didn't really get around, if he wants to get married in middle age, he's going to have to get an exemplary girl who's abo…
/r/TheRedPill12/04/17 03:23 PM
1

stop BEING hen-pecked! losers
/r/MensRights28/07/16 10:09 PM
1

There are no benefits. It only lowers your perceived value. And confirms the female chauvinist theory that the longer a man goes without sex, the lower his standards get. Which feminist use to socially engineer bad matches, as petty revenge for making them feel fat and stupid, even when they are.
/r/TheRedPill13/04/16 02:07 AM
2

I hung out with a stripper the summer after I graduated college. She used to call me on the phone, in a sexy voice, and say, 'I have a special job that only you can handle.' Upon driving over to her house, she would ask me to move some heavy furniture. Needless to say, I shook her off pretty quick.
/r/TheRedPill07/03/16 08:38 PM
1

No I am. My point is that teens are impulsive and don't have a clear understanding of the world, or of themselves. So even if two peers had sex with eachother in high school, one or both could still come away from it feeling manipulated or exploited. But if it was an adult and a minor student, that's most certainly a malicious crime on the part of the adult, no matter which gender either the child or adult happen to be.
/r/MensRights26/02/16 02:55 AM
6

I regret having sex in high school, and it was totally consensual at the time. But I did not understand the greater ramifications of that sex, and what it would cost me in the future... All I knew was that most of my friends had already been laid, the hotter, more pristine girls at my school weren't biting, I was very insecure, macho by way of over-compensation, and here's this somewhat random, average-looking girl who was willing... I often feel like SHE manipulated ME by withholding informatio…
/r/MensRights25/02/16 08:56 PM
7

I remember once when I was 17 a bunch of friends and I went camping in Oklahoma. Well, long story short, we were there to party and we made too much noise. The cops came. The girls panicked. On of them dumped 2 oz of marijuana in the middle of the campsite. Cops found it. it was closest to the girl who dropped it because she had tried to drop it from her pocket without them noticing. The cops said, 'If someone doesn't claim this we're going to put it on her.' It was hers, so no one claimed it. C…
/r/MensRights22/02/16 04:09 PM
0

I don't think violence is ever really justified, but I do find it easy to empathize with violent people in certain situations. I think that's the whole appeal of the action film.
/r/MensRights13/02/16 03:26 AM
2

Seems to me that men tend to react in an irrationally violent manner when there is unaccountability, irrationality, betrayal, pettiness, malicious intent, delusion, false accusations, false promises, slander, and stupidity on the part of females.
/r/MensRights12/02/16 08:13 PM
6

You know what I've figured out? Women are often more conscientious daters than men, and men could learn from that. Instead of simply trying to score all the time, acknowledge when you are wrong for her or she is wrong for you, and walk away. That's what women do, and if men did that as well, we wouldn't be perceived as so desperate and manipulative. EDIT: That being said, there are exceptions to every rule. I was with a woman for 5 years who knew she was wrong for me, and perpetuated the relatio…
/r/TheRedPill09/02/16 07:42 PM
3

"But Madame CEO, if we spent $70k on gay corporate photo shoots, $7 million on lavish corporate parties, and $3 million on private jets, what will the stockholders eat?" "Let them eat cake," she said, flippantly...
/r/MGTOW04/02/16 03:35 PM
1

I think I have missed opportunities by being too aloof, but really I was simply hanging back because I like to know who I am dealing with. And maybe I did miss the opportunity to bang some shady skank(s) here or there. But of course, in between meeting them and missing that opportunity, I probably found out stuff about them that I didn't like, and it turned me off... so is that any great loss? I kick myself for missing more innocent opportunities... But those opportunities can't be realized by b…
/r/TheRedPill29/01/16 05:43 PM
1

Sounds like you are about to marry a prostitute. She has shown her hand. I would start looking for better options on the DL. LoL
/r/TheRedPill07/01/16 05:33 PM
1

From my own writing: "People can say that race is a social construct, and they can even get people to believe that, but the only way to truly eliminate race is to make everyone a mulatto with no perception of ethnic roots. Now, I don’t have a problem with black men going after white women. I really don’t, unless it’s the same one I want. Some white women can only be satisfied by a black man, and that’s their prerogative. I’ve had white women discriminate against me for reasons far pettier than s…
/r/TheRedPill04/01/16 10:30 PM
1

Liberals are no better than the church when it comes to using guilt as a method of social control... Except instead of guilting people over religious morality, they guilt people over privilege politics. The hypocrisy is that they assert that those who judge whores are more harmful than the whores, and thus they seek to set up a 'non-judgmental' society... But that society ends up being highly judgmental of anyone who champions responsibility, accountability... or even social justice. This is why…
/r/MGTOW04/01/16 08:49 PM
-1

Yeah I personally think it should be called 'Cultural Stalinism'. Leave Marx out of it. but I'm not the one who coined the term. Come to think of it, maybe it should be called 'Cultural Maoism'. Didn't Chairman Mao have the 'Cultural Revolution'?
/r/MensRights15/12/15 10:00 PM
3

Sounds exactly like how women react when you ask them to pay their share of the check.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 05:58 PM
2

I support his stance, and I wish I had been classy like that when I was younger. The truth is, messing around with the wrong women will opportunity-cost you the right one. People are gonna call this guy a dweeb, but if he had done with this girl what most guys would, she would have put him in a 'damaged goods' social class, and he would never have done any better. If she's not exactly who you want, friend-zone that ass, otherwise getting tangled up with her will cost you a better girl. That's sm…
/r/TheRedPill01/12/15 04:20 PM
1

She lost a child custody case, now has to pay child support, and is sad about it. I challenge you to recall the last time you felt bad for a man who was in that situation, which is quite a common situation for a man to be in, because family courts RARELY side with the man. If you are feeling cognitive dissonance right now, it's because your bias has been exposed.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/15 04:19 PM
3

I mean, I got fucked by a family court once, worse than her, and with less reasonable cause. It was just a crooked court, and she had a better lawyer. And let me tell you, I wanted to die. It ruined me financially and socially. But did anyone give a fuck? No. No one ever did. They still haven't. And that's my point. This shit happens to men all the time. And no one gives a shit. No wonder we kill ourselves four times more than women do. Neither the system nor society has ever given a fuck about …
/r/TheRedPill01/12/15 04:16 PM
1

I fully understand that the music business can ruin someone's life... Or maybe even an obsession with practicing, or fantasizing about wealth and fame that never happens. I'm an amateur musician myself, so I understand that. But she was a successful professional musician. She was paid large sums of money, got to tour the world, was made famous, and a smart person could have done a lot with the opportunities she was given. I know this sounds cliche, but she threw it all away by being nuts, so let…
/r/TheRedPill01/12/15 04:08 PM
2

Also, that song was written by a man. Sinead only performed it. It was a cover of a Prince song that he never recorded himself.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/15 04:02 PM
1

That's great, I had not even considered that. LoL
/r/TheRedPill01/12/15 03:59 PM
2

Yeah, I respect that, and if I were her friend in real life I would probably be there for her... but as a symbolic, archetypical celebrity on the internet, I attack her whole concept.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/15 08:04 PM
-1

I agree, but my point is that when is a man ever given sympathy over mental health issues? More often men are victim-blamed for that kind of thing. It's one more hypocritical expectation of our gender: not only are we expected to be physically strong, but mentally resilient as well... Meanwhile, women are given a pass on emotional fragility. These are the kind of patriarchal gender roles that women hypocritically support: because these double-standards benefit them.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/15 07:28 PM
12

I think Amy Schumer's look makes sense for Pirelli. I mean, she does resemble a stack of tires... LoL
/r/TheRedPill30/11/15 06:58 PM
5

Yeah, another point I have to make is that this same shit happens to men all the time: getting screwed by family court. And yet no one gives a fuck about 'deadbeat dads'. But there is all this sympathy for the rare occasion that a woman loses in that same situation. Seriously, I got this from a friend's Facebook wall, he is a liberal, has all kinds of liberal friends, and the most common sentiment expressed was sympathy. I seriously doubt that any of those people would or ever have sympathized w…
/r/TheRedPill30/11/15 06:34 PM
7

Meh. I'm a manic-depressive myself, but men and women alike have made fun of me for that, or blamed me as the victim of those problems... But a female celebrity will get sympathy even when she fails at life. Men on the other hand, are universally hated, win or lose.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/15 06:04 PM
8

I do all of those things, but that doesn't mean I don't like to stay informed. As far as beautiful women goes, they are all victim to idol-worship and group think. Getting them is often a matter of winning propaganda wars for public opinion. So maybe Sinead O'Connor, through her celebrity media influence, IS the reason why I'm not fucking beautiful women right now... I mean, most women young enough to be beautiful probably have never heard of O'Connor, but their mamas and their big sisters, who …
/r/TheRedPill30/11/15 05:51 PM
1

sounds like false-flag humanitarianism to me. Lot's of people try to appear sensitive in order to get the esteem of their peers. Doesn't mean they are actually good people, more likely just manipulative.
/r/TheRedPill30/11/15 04:51 PM
0

Even outside of religion, in a totally secular society, there would still be a stigma of prostitutes and the promiscuous. There will always be two kinds of people: the promiscuous and hopeless romantics, and they will never get along. Even if religion, capitalism, and democracy were not factors. But since they are factors, the promiscuous are seen as immoral, not to mention both capitalistic AND democratic threats.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 10:03 PM
2

In other words: the sex trade, even without the oppressive influence of pimps, who rob the proceeds of the operation by charging overly high administrative overhead, even in the best of situations where there are no pimps, prostitution will still be merely another form of wage-slavery, making women, along with working-class males, merely slaves to landlords, employers, the government, and lenders.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 09:51 PM
0

And democratic socialism as well. Both systems assert that popularity=right, whether that popularity expresses itself in the form of markets or votes.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 09:28 PM
-2

I understand that the internet has eliminated the need for pimps in many cases. But then the women become their own pimps, use the same methods, and are generally no better.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 08:48 PM
-2

Your response reeks of false-flag liberal idealism, the kind of non-judgmental, non-confrontational community of sycophants and yes-men, where everyone is perpetually wrong, because no one is ever corrected.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 08:19 PM
-2

Not to mention the fact that the whole reason unspoiled beauty is so hard to find is because the prettiest girls get sucked into modelling, stripping, or prostitution, leaving gentleman the leftovers and remainders of these operations.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 07:53 PM
-2

I believe it is in the best interest of all men to understand the dangers of prostitution, especially considering that the modern public education system consistently brainwashes young men with naive idealist feminist rhetoric that tells them 'there are no such things as whores, and if you call a woman out for being a whore, or her johns for being whore-mongers, then you are merely chastizing them for having normal sexuality'.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 07:47 PM
-1

Meh... I think this is all part of cloistering women. Which shouldn't be done. Not only is it sexist, implying that they can't handle reality, it's also unfair to put the burden of maintaining unrealistic expectations onto men. My point is simply this: If there is a sinkhole in the road, and a man wrecks out on it, society says, 'He's a bad driver'. If a woman wrecks out on it, 'We need to fix that road.' So thar's exactly why we SHOULDN'T shelter women from the world's problems. Often times, a …
/r/TheRedPill04/11/15 09:54 PM
0

https://jacksterriblethoughts.wordpress.com/2015/02/06/27-reasons-why-you-should-not-date-yet-another-feminist/
/r/TheRedPill04/11/15 04:39 PM
4

I came from a somewhat affluent family, but they were quite conservative, so I eventually decided that, rather than be affiliated with causes I don't really find conscionable, I would just walk away, and make my own way in the world... By the time I had made that decision, I was already college-educated, and more than capable of making enough money to finance a simple lifestyle. Problem is, most women, no matter how 'liberal' simply do not understand the concept of asceticism for ethical reasons…
/r/TheRedPill13/10/15 05:59 PM
9

"Actually, his life is Chasing Amy - the one where an insecure guy freaks out, interrogates the woman and ruins a great thing due to his petty jealousy and immaturity." I wouldn't consider helping a worn-out hamster raise her two kids 'a great thing'... Not when there are fine-ass virgins turning 18 every day...
/r/TheRedPill09/10/15 06:30 PM
0

Polyamory is basically sexual communism. What happened with regular communism? It looked great on paper, but didn't work when applied.
/r/MGTOW28/09/15 08:18 PM
-9

Most students wouldn't intervene in many cases of sexual exploitation, like if a known promiscuous person were smooth-talking a more prudent person... In other words 'rape by dishonesty'... The college culture considers getting fucked around a 'rite of passage', and yet doesn't offer a clear 'last stop' at the end of the ride, or when someone wants to get off the bus. So you get fucked around, learn better judgment, and then they say you are 'too judgmental'.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 05:21 PM
4

My ex is a teacher with a fucked-up personal life in which she has often ruined the lives of those she gets too involved with via her social and financial (she comes from a rich family) position of privilege. I often speculate that she sees her career as 'positive transference', in other words, 'I screwed a bunch of people over, so now I'm making it up to karma and the universe by helping these kids.' The problem with positive transference is that, even as you help those who share characteristic…
/r/TheRedPill17/09/15 06:13 PM
0

No, the man is criticized more. He is seen as a 'dirty old lecher, taking advantage of a naive young lady'. White knight protectionism comes into play.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 07:03 PM
1

A relationship between an older man and a younger woman will always come under fire from their families and communities. This was written as a defense.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 06:37 PM
0

That's authoritarian communism, then. Ducks and geese my friend. Two different animals commonly mistaken for eachother.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 07:06 PM
0

Socialism is about sharing. There are plenty of greedy, selfish feminists who do not follow the rules of socialism.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 04:22 PM
0

Most feminists are not socialists, or even non-racist. They merely want more for themselves. Idealistic altruism has very little to do with it. Like most fringe special interests associated with the Democratic party, it's more about 'getting theirs' than bringing about a more equitable, just world for all. This is obvious when feminist prioritize self-interest over core liberal values, time and time again.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 02:25 AM
0

In my opinion, most modern feminists are more Ayn Rand than Emma Goldman.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 12:55 AM
-4

Because you are so 'open-minded', you refuse to read anything you might disagree with?
/r/MensRights04/09/15 07:21 PM
2

try cafepress.con print on demand. I have a shop through there, mostly for fulfilling my own crazy designs of wacky shirts I want to wear, but I actually sell one through their site every now and then, too. So far, the only designs they rejected were images copyrighted by others, and a shirt that said 'Big Brotha Be Watchin' You' with a picture of Obama on it. LoL
/r/MensRights12/08/15 10:42 PM
1

Anyway, maybe she wasn't 'good enough to do that for you'. Maybe she was bad enough to do it to you.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 05:16 PM
1

I'm sorry, but there is something you said that I feel like I have to focus on for a minute: 'calling girls "skanks" because they were good enough to sleep with me.' OK, so why would you consider sex a service that a woman does for a man, in that sense. I'm not one of those 'sex is bad' people, but don't you agree that sex CAN BE bad in certain situations? In other words, if two peoples' intentions are misaligned, or one is exploiting the other? A person could exploit another person by having se…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 05:08 PM
1

I think in America, the nice guy is exploited and that eventually makes him not so nice. Selfishness is often painted with a coat of liberal idealism and social conscience.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 04:23 PM
2

Yeah, I definitely don't hate all women, but I have gotten to know women in general well enough to know that there are types I like and types I don't. And the bad ones tend to come between me and the good ones. So I avoid the bad ones, in order to leave myself open to the good ones. But at the same time, I'm completely honest about my past and how I came by my opinions, so the good women, who tend to be more discerning, often judge me the same way men can judge a girl who got screwed around by d…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 04:03 PM
1

Yeah... you see, I grew up in the ghetto, sold drugs to put myself through college, and in those travels, I did meet some shitty people, racketeers, exploiters, self-entitled addicts, and hos.. And yes, they were hos. No ideology will make me gloss that over. But yeah there are definitely bad people out there and if you were ever confined by society to a lower social class due to financial or cultural reasons, you wouldn't be so naive about it. Don't think of it as 'the apple doesn't fall far fr…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 03:59 PM
1

Well good for you, but don't misattribute that to your own goodness instead of simply having better luck or a more socially privileged background than the next guy.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 03:55 PM
2

This is the summary that goes on my Facebook wall: Random altercations I have publicized: Got a lecture today from a so-called 'MRA', with the usual accusations. Turns out he was one of these phony positive philanderers. I'm just like: 'Look, just because you love women and leave them, don't blame me because women love me and leave me. I'm not you. The same shit could happen to both of us, or even moreso to you than me, and you could be happy and I could be bitter, because we both want different…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 02:56 PM
1

Let me ask you a question about your personal psychology: Do you repress your negative emotions by subscribing to an overly-idealistic philosophy that negates their validity? Because that can come out in your behavior. Perhaps in the form of putting on a fake, phony, nice-guy happy face to the rest of the world, and using that as a means to be sexually exploitative. And maybe that depravity is because you repressed your negative emotions, so it comes out in that form. I don't think of being with…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 02:03 PM
1

LoL. So women are ego trophies to you, then? See that's where we differ, methinks. I would consider the 5-year long term relationship I was in an accomplishment if it weren't riddled with compromises and me getting screwed around the whole time, in retrospect. As far as obsessing over a summer fling in my youth, I mean, I don't think about that girl regularly. She is part of my past, though, and an experience I learned from. About myself. About the world. Why would I be in denial over that? Just…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 01:54 PM
1

I think I've already revealed more than enough personal info to you, and you have used it all to make snap judgments. typical white knight. I see there is no point in continuing this discussion.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 01:15 PM
1

All I can really say for myself is that I used to be naive and idealistic like you, got a bare minimum of experience under my belt, observed how that made me feel, and now I don't think that way. But my point is that if a young, naive woman had been screwed around (not screwed around, but BEEN screwed around) like me, and sincerely wanted a committed relationship that actually worked, there would be this social pressure on the community to: a: not judge her for her past and b: find her a man who…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 01:12 PM
0

The only thing keeping me single is not meeting a woman up to my standards, who is willing. I live in a college town and there are plenty of opportunities to screw around. I recognize them and let them pass me by, because I don't want to get distracted or weighed down by any more of that kind of baggage. Call it paranoia, I simply think of it as being a good judge of character.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:48 PM
1

You know, I'm not seeing promiscuous people put into second class citizenship, as many have implied. If anything, I feel like a second class citizen as a monogamist. Because I don't have the social, systemic, and employment opportunities that a promiscuous person has. It's all about social capital. So no, I don't think they should have fewer rights and opportunities as a consequence of their lifestyles, but I don't think they should have MORE rights and opportunities than me, which they DO. And …
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:46 PM
1

I'm saying that promiscuous people should only have relationships with other promiscuous people. But because of looks and sexual attraction, sometimes a player wants a naive or reserved person, and so they lie and manipulate to get that person. And yeah, that's wrong. Making them believe there is serious potential when there isn't. That's stringing someone along. And you know it doesn't bother me much when slutty people are slutty. But for myself, I have to be discerning. It's a defense mechanis…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:37 PM
0

She was a bar skank because she routinely did that and thought nothing of it. In that situation, she was the player and I was the naive person who got taken advantage of. I think your bias and double standards are really becoming obvious here. If a man did that to multiple women, you would see him as the insensitive d-bag, manipulator, user. But you are unwilling to apply that label to a woman who does it to men.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:33 PM
0

The only other fling I had was with a girl, you know we had been friends for a few years and we had always wanted to hook up, but some shitty situation or another had always come between us. Then one day I bumped into her and she said she was leaving the country forever in two months. So we hooked up because we both wanted it so badly. I would have been willing to continue the relationship, but she prioritized her career over us and left the country, ended up marrying a foreign national for the …
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:27 PM
1

Basically, I guess my point is: it's the person who doesn't call you back that makes it a one night stand or a cheap fling. I was never that person. I don't love and leave. I am always willing to continue the relationship. But these days I am far less willing to initiate a relationship, because I know most girls who are willing are skanks. I guess I'm waiting for the door that only opens for me. And I don't really appreciate the slippery slope argument you are using: 'You hooked up with a skank …
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:19 PM
1

I am one hundred percent certain that, as an honest, intelligent person, she would probably describe herself of that era the exact same way. She knows what she was. And I'm not gonna gloss it over. The story was, my highschool sweetheart had left me, I was mega depressed. Locked myself in an apartment for over a year, was doing sculptures at the time. I was 19, and most of my friends were douchey players. They felt my depression was from 'not getting laid', so they set me up with a loose woman, …
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:13 PM
2

Why are you so desperate to call me 'desperate'? If you understood writers or musicians, you would understand that music and writing is merely what comes out of us without much effort, and the content is influenced by our lives. So I could have been a pop musician or a fluff writer if I'd had a more privileged life. As it is, I had a hard life, so I write cynicism and metal. It really is that simple, but society never wants to acknowledge their own extensive role in the social critic's dark art.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:04 PM
0

But it wasn't meaningless to me. I don't go out on the bar scene trying to do that. My 'friends' had to drag me to that 'opportunity', pressure me about 'not getting laid', and she played along. I don't want to say I was taken advantage of, but it's not something I would do today, being older and wiser. And I seriously doubt she is ashamed. Even with her storied past, she managed to settle down and start a family. I on the other hand an 34, alone, and have been with fewer than 5 women in my life…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:02 PM
-7

Yeah, well that's just like, your opinion, man. LoL
/r/MensRights10/07/15 01:32 AM
0

Oh also she was like 10 years older than me. I was really young and naive at that point in my life.
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:09 AM
-7

Meh. I define that kind of type by BEHAVIOR, not random thoughts they entertain on a forum. Those guys who are out there 'strategizing' I mean, that's not me. I take responsibility by building my technical career and musical creativity, chasing my visions, expressing myself honestly, and not really giving a fuck what others think unless it's thoughtful, something I haven't already heard and debunked before. And there aren't a lot of people who can get to me like that, you know. Not for all the g…
/r/MensRights10/07/15 12:06 AM
18

Dude... people from real life stalk me on this board. I could make a new account, but it would be me, playing guitar, and the trolls would figure out really quick. Besides, why should I have to hide from them? It's whatever, most metal guitarists who drive sportscars are gonna be thought of as 'misogynist' by default, anyway. And by projecting that, they sort of create a self-fulfilling prophecy. I mean I can't say that being treated as 'prejudiced' actually helps me view that kind of person mor…
/r/MensRights09/07/15 11:25 PM
1

...Which is ridiculous. I mean, I'm a moderate SJW myself, but the rabid ones... Gawd, it's so exasperating.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 11:22 PM
4

I mean... that's what she was. She was a girl who hangs out in bars, my friends told her I needed a fuck so she threw a few my way... and within a couple of months she was bangin' some other dude. That was her routine back then. What else would you call that? For the record, I've never done that since. From that experience, I learned that quick flings like that aren't very satisfying, and I don't want to exploit women with psychological problems that cause them to do that to themselves.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 10:37 PM
1

That's the thing though, I'm actually NOT much of a Redpiller. I don't like players, want to get married to the right woman, etc... I just go in there to represent my perspective and very rarely do I agree with them.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 10:35 PM
26

Yeah I don't really care enough about my reddit karma to go to all that trouble...
/r/MensRights09/07/15 07:42 PM
239

I've had that problem personally with most of my posts, even those that have nothing to do with MRA, like posts of me just trying to get my independent music some exposure... And I think that really showcases the pettiness of SJWs, that they would be willing to sabotage someone's career and creative ambition over trifling social politics.
/r/MensRights09/07/15 06:21 PM
6

Women are given a license to commit atrocities because they are hysterical. Men on the other hand, are not allowed to have feelings.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 08:31 PM
7

Selective memories, revisionist female historians, and intoxicants tend to make for false rape accusations. If you ask my first girlfriend: 'J gave me acid when I was a virgin in High School, then he fucked me.' Of course, this was a lie by omission for many reasons: a) me, her, and everyone else in our group of friends were on acid back in those days b) The taking of the acid and the sex were separated by over a year, as we were sober when we finally gave it up to eachother c) We were both virg…
/r/MensRights11/06/15 10:16 PM
7

Silly redditor, when you are wounded, crying for help only summons vultures!
/r/TheRedPill11/06/15 10:06 PM
1

I hope that's a hard 12 months full of fisting and beatings and shit
/r/MensRights16/04/15 08:18 AM
2

The next time a female police officer, boss, or judge tries to exert systemic power over me, I'll just tell her: "According to this 8th grade social studies textbook, you aren't supposed to have political, economic, or institutional power!" huehuehuehue!
/r/MensRights03/03/15 08:58 PM
1

Her re-traumatization is his trauma!
/r/TheRedPill20/02/15 04:40 PM
1

I was dumb enough to live it, multiple times. I only hope the rest of the world can learn from my bad decisions.
/r/MGTOW11/02/15 12:43 AM
0

http://www.cafepress.com/doctorj/12200259
/r/MGTOW06/02/15 08:08 PM
-1

I've always been quite antagonistic to that forum, actually. And I've seen enough pu$$y to know that most of it ain't worth a damn.
/r/MGTOW28/01/15 08:23 AM
-1

As usual, you are oversimplifying because you don't know the details. If only it were that simple. I have dated hot girls AND ugly girls, and they used feminism as a rationalization to violate me, sexually, psychologically, socially, and financially.
/r/MGTOW26/01/15 04:18 PM
-1

Many, and I think they are all exploitative. Too Many Secrets!
/r/MGTOW19/01/15 09:40 PM
13

This is the kind of shit that is totally overlooked when women say: "My sexual past is none of your concern." Can you imagine what it would be like to live and work in a town full of your wife's baggage? It's humiliating!
/r/TheRedPill19/01/15 08:19 PM
2

One of many reasons I didn't pursue academia much further than undergrad... You don't need a weatherman to see that the wind blows against all but the most over-qualified of men, and is at the backs of any woman willing to validate equality theory with her best efforts... even if those efforts are subpar by the same standards used to evaluate males. So what's the point? It's just one more negative of being a professional academic male as opposed to working in the private sector, where pay is hig…
/r/TheRedPill15/01/15 08:13 PM
7

Proof that 'the friend zone' sucks even for men who have no sexual interest in women...
/r/MGTOW12/01/15 10:15 PM
0

Ethics are contingent upon social norms, which are derived from opinion. Common opinions are often created via indoctrination, and the opinions born of independent thought are often suppressed, both popularly and systemically.
/r/MensRights09/01/15 07:28 PM
0

Oh really? So you think that a woman who has fucked all your friends, or maybe even your enemies, has the same long-term relationship value as a monogamist? This isn't about morality, it's about ethics and pragmatism. It's a statistically documented fact that people who sleep around more are less likely to abide by committed relationships at any point in their life, and are more likely to be unsentimental, nihilistic, emotionless psychopaths. Thus, 'slut shaming' is less about judging those with…
/r/MensRights08/01/15 10:23 PM
0

How so? Support your statement.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 09:20 PM
0

SJW niche groupthink is all up in ur forum, bannin' ur posts!
/r/MensRights07/01/15 10:48 PM
1

Honestly, I could have annotated it with links to data, I just felt the data was so well-known already in MRA circles it wasn't totally necessary. Also, one of the article I linked to did have a lot of the backing sources, so it seemed redundant to add all that to my article. Also, I am no PUA, and never really have been. In my experience, PUA's are the worst lovers, because they are always needing to con more women into sleeping with them, and the best lovers are bad PUA's, because they know ho…
/r/MensRights07/01/15 07:14 PM
2

All I will say is that a female's desire can make a man a target... in a bad way. In a town full of white knights trying to save women from their own bad judgment, misinformationists who either break down their social enemies or hype their social allies, people who are judgmental of eachother's relationships (Do you really think THAT'S the right guy for her?!?!) And let's not forget about insecurely jealous lesbians and feminists who want to sabotage any kind of healthy relationship, which they …
/r/TheRedPill06/01/15 09:24 PM
10

It can go even further than that: in my community, the most desirable females have a feminist community that guards them: if such an alpha female has a crush on a man that can't be quashed with the usual behind the back character assassination, they will then conspire to 'hook him up' with an inferior female specimen, both as a means of diverting him and making him less attractive to the enpedastalled female.
/r/TheRedPill05/01/15 10:27 PM
13

It isn't, to my knowledge. Being a promiscuous male will certainly disqualify you from many opportunities. One of the great fears of the prized, hard-to-get LTR female is sleeping with a smooth-talking man-whore who ultimately won't take her seriously, and this is the primary reason many women are so reserved, picky, and quick to flee once they percieve a red flag. They see promiscuous men as unlikely to be able to abide by commitment, in the same way that men see promiscuous females as similarl…
/r/TheRedPill05/01/15 10:06 PM
4

I've been kicked out of other forums, most notably r/anarchism and r/socialism, simply for being a contributor to TRP. This only convinced me that reddit has an extremely liberal bias. I am neither liberal nor conservative, but decidedly centrist, as I have spent a lot of time studying bias, and trying to avoid it. I keep telling people, "If you want to lose your faith in extreme liberal ethos, lurk reddit for awhile. Bunch of pipe-dreaming censorist hippie-crits."
/r/TheRedPill19/12/14 03:28 PM
3

Also, I think that Dave Grohl, as the new drummer in the band, and the newcomer to the community built up around the band, made a lot of of these same points in real time, during Kurt and Courtney's relationship, and everyone just thought he was kind of a d-bag to even say anything about it. Because everyone had become comfortable with the elephant in the room, and Grohl, as a bit of an outsider, was very struck by it, and wanted to solve a problem that everyone was in denial of. But after Kurt'…
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 07:14 PM
2

While I agree that living in a 'woe is me' state never really allowed anyone to help themselves, I draw a pretty solid line between 'whining' and 'constructive criticism'. Just remember that every technological advance, every political breakthrough, every cultural renaissance started with someone admitting to themselves and possibly even evangelizing to others that "this (current standard we have) is NOT good enough." And often the first step to fixing a problem is admitting that there is a prob…
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 07:07 PM
-1

A progressive society most certainly has goals, however those goals can sometimes be questionable, or achieved through questionable means. Competition can be healthy in some cases and unhealthy in others. I think in the Auto industry, for example, competition has been a great influence in spurring technological development. But in the academic research and software concerns, collective cooperation has been far more productive. The scientific community tends to share knowledge and be as globally …
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 06:26 PM
0

It should be the goal of the progressive society to solve social problems instead of deliberately exacerbating and exploiting them. It's like the difference between a capitalist doctor and socialized medicine. How can you trust a health professional who's running a business, any more than you can trust a car mechanic who tells you the engine needs an overhaul when all he's gonna do is a tuneup? Point is, no one is perfect, but most people have unique strengths. The whole point of society is to t…
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 05:41 AM
-4

He was a talented guy with a lot of potential, but society failed him by exploiting his problems instead of helping him solve them.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 05:21 AM
1

I mean, I'm a big fan of his work, but I'm glad I overcame the self-confidence issues he had instead of killing myself at a young age from being overwhelmed by both personal demons and an unsupportive entourage. Broomfield, the detective who investigated Kurt Cobain's death ultimately said, "Not that he was murdered, but that there was just a lack of caring for him. I just think that Courtney had moved on, and he was expendable." So it was kind of a social negligence homicide, and everyone aroun…
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 05:02 AM
4

Yeah, talk about a guy who swallowed the blue pill, and it ended up killing him.
/r/TheRedPill18/12/14 04:47 AM
2

Hitler explains the Law of Attraction: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rukqsrfwduk
/r/MGTOW15/12/14 10:08 PM
1

If women want to be heroes, and sacrifice themselves to save my cat from a burning building, then why should we hold them back, just because they aren't physically capable of surviving such a hazard? The important thing is that me and my cat are safe.
/r/MensRights15/12/14 06:30 PM
12

If people who are drunk cannot legally give consent then why do they allow police to search drunk people?
/r/TheRedPill10/12/14 07:36 PM
2

Sense of entitlement/ownership of one's partner... The same shit they accuse us of. Projection much?
/r/MensRights09/12/14 08:03 PM
14

could be your girl, when you're not around... "Hey, where did you get the money for that Prada bag, dear?" "Uhhhh... It's a factory second I bought at an outlet mall!"
/r/MGTOW05/12/14 10:12 PM
2

That's because raising the baby is the woman's job, and putting food on the table is the man's job You see, women only fight against the gender roles that don't directly benefit them. They are perfectly fine with the gender roles that exploit or oppress men. In fact, even if some men were to try and raise awareness or fight back against male gender roles, most feminists would refer to them as patriarchs, misogynists, or closeted transexual/homosexuals.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 06:54 PM
10

Apparently, according to feminists, two wrongs DO make a right... Even if the first wrong is imaginary!
/r/MensRights04/12/14 06:23 PM
1

When did this forum become about changing natural male behaviors in the name of female approval? First the communists took over r/anarchism and now this. I feel sorry for the new generation of redditors, who have been taught a bunch of doublethink and newspeak by agent provocateurs.
/r/TheRedPill04/12/14 04:29 PM
5

It's not necessarily a feminist problem. Most people are total hypocrites with a very shallow grasp on logical consistency. I blame a public education system that teaches kids to memorize instead of think. Awareness of the basic fallacies should be a major goal of the public education system, but why would any legislator with influence over the Board of Education do that? It would enable the next generation of voters to see through all their bullshit.
/r/MensRights04/12/14 04:12 PM
0

There are plenty of believers who are employed in scientific or academic fields. Scientific objectivity/rationality and faith are not mutually exclusive. As with all things, it's not so black and white. They don't throw scientists out of church and they don't throw religious people out of science class, unless either is creating a disturbance. There is plenty of crossover in real, adult life. This is more about tolerance of other cultures than it is about intellectual one-upmanship. But truly, e…
/r/TheRedPill03/12/14 04:23 PM
1

Source? I suppose if you want mine, it's "The Selfish Gene" by Dawkins. I don't like is most popular book, "The God Delusion", because I feel that evolutionary biologists have no place speculating about the existence of God, even if their work has been useful in refuting creationist dogma. But the study of evolutionary psychology is not likely to evoke an admiration for the human race, or life in general.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/14 03:51 PM
1

GETTING married isn't what this survey is about. Staying married is. A healthy marriage is born of abundance, not desperation.
/r/TheRedPill02/12/14 03:45 PM
2

The free market is short-sighted, and has caused an environmental catastrophe that will eventually destroy mankind if left unchecked. Whether you are a shyster lawyer, pill-pushing capitalist doctor, or a used car salesman, you are some variety of con artist. The only exceptions I suppose are the engineers and the workers. Maybe some of the artists. But these people are usually the first ones chastised by the system. The yuppie 80's produced the worst generation of psychopaths this world has eve…
/r/TheRedPill02/12/14 03:42 PM
-6

Your assumptions reflect the bias of a capitalist society. Under capitalism, most men are con artists of some sort, and most women are engineered to be prostitutes. Thus, most procreation is between con artists and prostitutes, who tend to "win" natural selection, and the next generation reflects this.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/14 09:46 PM
3

Since marriage is a class/beauty privilege, the poor and ugly are often encouraged to sleep around. Those who have already done so will try to drag others down to their level, in order to take them out of the running for all the classy partners they have disqualified themselves from.
/r/TheRedPill01/12/14 09:44 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EK8544y8dmI
/r/MGTOW19/11/14 07:10 PM
20

Because if a man plays the victim card, he has a 'victim complex' that shouldn't be enabled. But if a woman does the same, everyone says 'don't blame the victim'.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 03:51 PM
0

If you type the word 'masculist' into most browsers, it will not pass the spellcheck. Apparently according to the Newspeak big brother internet revisionists, 'feminist' is a word, but 'masculist' isn't.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 04:48 PM
16

This should be seen more as an insult to women. Apparently, they need their own special "just for girls" class, because the normal man class moves too fast or covers too much ground for women to handle.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 06:56 PM
7

Sluts like this don't bother me, per se. What bothers me is the lying and the entitlement. She felty entitled to sow her wild oats and still marry a classy guy at the end of the line. And the maddening hypocrisy is that she will eventually espouse that feminist shite of projecting her own entitlement on the male community in general. Anyway, a hypocrite like that deserves a bad reputation and a life of shame.
/r/TheRedPill01/11/14 08:34 PM
1

I think it's a very disturbing trend, when people say a person "has issues" just because he has come to terms with his problems and is willing to discuss them publicly. The people you should worry about are the ones who pretend as if everything is just peachy because they have unresolved, repressed issues. I see you as the type to be taken in by the person who puts on the mask of perfection, someone not yet mature enough to be honest with himself or others. Good luck with that.
/r/TheRedPill31/10/14 05:21 AM
1

And let me say this: my parents loved me. THey were just misguided, victim-blaming Randroids who thought they were doing me a favor by depriving me. Women have loved me, believe it or not, but most of them were ultimately too shallow to understand my prioritization of causes over comforts.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 10:21 PM
1

Silver spoon? Not really. I was the product of a mixed-class marriage that ended in divorce when I was 2. My wealthy father moved onto another family and focused most of his efforts there. If I had really tried to swallow all of his bullshit, he may have treated me like a son, but how could I when I lived in the ghetto with my mother, a broke musician, every other week? Once again your assumptions are wrong, because you are arguing from a very unscientific position of wanting to prove something …
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 10:19 PM
0

I only bring up gender equality in reaction to how often it is brought up by women who love to project their own sexism and self-entitlement onto men. By "endured poverty" I mean cut off from a wealthy family at age 18 because I refused to tow the ultra-conservative family line. Sportscars, Ivy League education, beachfront property, trust funds, and debutantes could have all been mine if only I had swallowed the pill of fascism. I instead took a more ascetic, spiritual path, and the only regret …
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 08:23 PM
0

I gave up on equality a long time ago. These days, I only want someone psychologically capable of abiding by the terms of a marriage, who is reasonably intelligent and attractive. But all I'm saying is, the differences in the way men and women are raised makes gender equality a bad joke. And let me just say that your effort at rebuttal, while valiant, probably appears far greater to you than a neutral observer. You might think you are revolutionary, but your attitude and rhetoric are cookie-cutt…
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 07:25 PM
0

I do realize it's a very narrow pool, but that doesn't mean I feel entitled to generic sexual stand-ins until I meet someone on my level. That, I believe would be sexual entitlement. And these kinds of superficial relationships cheat both people involved. As far as equality goes, I don't think the genders will be truly equal until they are treated equally by society, and have the same life experience. As it is, social customs regarding courtship, and traditional gender roles, destroy all possibi…
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 06:02 PM
0

"Don't be naive, Michael... Politicians don't have people killed." "Who is being naive, Kate?" -Mario Puzo, The Godfather
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 04:35 PM
-2

I know you tried really hard to sound clever, but your reliance on ad hominem really betrays both ignorance and lack of class. I could respond to you point by point but I don't think it's worth my time.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 03:20 PM
1

Bitches and hookers will attempt to manipulate you by lowering your self-confidence as well. Classic hooker rhetoric: "If you aren't willing to pay to fuck me, you must either be broke, impotent, or gay." It's basically trying to implant the idea into a man's mind: "You are not valid unless you are with a woman." And then, the feminists project this onto us, as if we were doing this to them. When in reality, most men love the idea of a woman surviving without them! If you've ever run with a grou…
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 02:23 PM
-1

Yes, I do want LTR... but why would you assume I've never done the quick fling? I tried it once or twice in college. It was unfulfilling and bad karma. I've never once had a one night stand though. I think that if she doesn't come for more, you must suck in bed. I don't want kids. I think they are wastes of time, energy, and money, and there are too many people in the world anyway. I think of my music, writing, and art as my children.
/r/TheRedPill30/10/14 01:02 PM
-5

No, I grew up in a neighborhood where white male privilege was the norm, and yet because I was the product of divorce, and my mother was lower class, I was denied this privilege. So it's like being shown the glory of everything you can't have. This is what pushed me to accomplish more, and yet my accomplishments are still not held in the same esteem as inherited privilege. Furthermore, I still have to deal with college liberals calling me "over-privileged" as a matter of guilt by association, wi…
/r/TheRedPill29/10/14 08:38 PM
-2

Ok, so qualify my post with "In America..." or even "In the South..." that doesn't invalidate it, and you are being deliberately obtuse to suggest so.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/14 08:00 PM
-1

Because women are more adept at ad hominem than rational discussion.
/r/MensRights29/10/14 07:58 PM
-2

I really hope and pray that there are worthy candidates... But so far, even the Mafia has been unable to find me an equal... not to mention Facebook and match.com...
/r/TheRedPill29/10/14 07:25 PM
-5

Don't underestimate my travels, and the eclectic variety of women to whom I have been exposed. Am I lucky? I don't think so. Lucky enough not to have been born in Sarajevo, perhaps, but as an American, I have been subject to all the institutionalized bigotry of that system. And that's why they call it 'middle class': we pay for both the top AND the bottom.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/14 06:36 PM
-3

not 'any'. 'most'. I dealt with more than most women, accomplished more than most, and that's why most won't do. This won't stop them from meddling and interfering in my social life, however, either out of jealousy, or their own designs for me. You know women can be just as cut throat over alpha males as men can be over alpha females, right?
/r/TheRedPill29/10/14 05:56 PM
-9

Not everyone who is successful in spite of hardship has MTV cameras following them around, nor would they necessarily want that. And I'm certainly not the type to walk into an establishment and demand special privileges just because of who I am. I slide in and out of many spots unnoticed, and not bitter about it. But at the same time, how do you compete with the peacockers without stooping to swaggery yourself?
/r/TheRedPill29/10/14 05:54 PM
-6

Don't misuse words. 'Douche' and 'douchebag' necessarily connote womanizing. Most of the people on this forum qualify a lot better for that title than myself.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/14 04:49 PM
-4

I threw all of my participation trophies away. The only trophy I need is the one for merit.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/14 04:48 PM
-9

Except I can actually back up everything I'm saying, privately, if I had to. Many of it has already been verified, publicly. I'm posting from a salaried desk job that I couldn't have obtained without education and skill. I drive a car I designed myself to get here. I have been through a lot and overcome it all. There is footage of me being musical all over the internet. Some people lead interesting lives of adventure that strengthen them with experience. Others watch TV in the suburbs their whol…
/r/TheRedPill29/10/14 04:18 PM
-2

I don't really expect equality in a woman. I gave up on that a long time ago. I'm just saying, equality politics are stupid. There will always be some super-man, or (hopefully) super-woman to put everyone else to shame. To think that all people are equal is naive and idealistic. Anyway, I think men and women will be equal when they are treated equally by society. When they have the same life experience. And social privilege created by traditional gender roles destroys any possibility of that.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/14 04:14 PM
-3

But all true. Just goes to show you: The longer a man is chained to a male gender role, the more superior he becomes. Perhaps some of that superiority is from privilege, but most is from hardship. The female gender role, on the other hand, creates social privilege, which ultimately makes women weak from indulgence and lack of pressure.
/r/TheRedPill29/10/14 11:53 AM
1

I could tell that same story with a bunch of girls =D
/r/TheRedPill28/10/14 02:31 PM
2

Yes. And let me tell you my opinion: Game = Drama Even if you can pretend to be the person that woman really wants, banging her will only entail drama. I find that knowing who you are and the type you want, and representing yourself totally honestly is the best way to have positive relationships.
/r/TheRedPill17/10/14 03:30 PM
4

Bullshit that can only be validated at the point of a gun. Or in the case of an online forum, banning your opposition.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 08:34 PM
8

You wanna see progressive liberal revisionism? go to r/anarchism The mods of that forum have redefined the word 'anarchism' to mean 'revolutionary democrat'. Fucking disgusting. That someone could take a word and redefine it via sheer force of numbers, and creating a false consensus.
/r/TheRedPill13/10/14 08:07 PM
1

I'll go you one further than that: Many women project their own persecution complexes onto others, even onto ACTUAL VICTIMS. This is the worst kind of victim-blaming, because it discredits the victim as it blames them.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/14 04:51 PM
1

probably when I wrote the song honestly, I'm a constantly shifting kaleidoscope of phases, easily influenced by my environment =D
/r/TheRedPill16/09/14 12:36 AM
-1

I actually have written the music, but I haven't had a chance to record as I have more important projects, plus no access to a metal band. But it's basically like early death metal. Sometimes you write a song as an emotional release. Normally I write classical guitar music, but this one came out of me like fire.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/14 07:09 PM
-1

Unlikely. I think cutting others with words is more fun than cutting myself with a knife. The truth is, this song describes most of the women whose looks are above a 5. And it's all because men spoil them. So fuck spoiling them. let them face the consequences of their own actions. It will probably make them better people inside.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/14 06:54 PM
1

I don't know you and wouldn't assume you are over-privileged. I've just noticed a trend of over-privileged people projecting their own faults onto others, and you have exhibited the tell-tale signs of it, specifically.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 11:55 AM
2

Fucking call out sneaky, manipulative lesbos and call hem on their bullshit. Treat them no differently than you would a male competitor. I mean, I'm not saying that they shouldn't have the right to marry or anything, but the idea that men should give them special privilege with the hottest female candidates is absurd. And lesbians will totally fuck with a young, attractive girl's mind... before she's done anything with anyone, or between relationships, when a man has really screwed her over. Les…
/r/TheRedPill14/09/14 11:14 PM
1

I think it is quite common for over-privileged people to project their own victim complexes onto people who are actually victims, and this is the worst kind of victim-blaming, because it discredits the victim as it blames them. No, I do not have delusions of persecution. How could anyone say that when I am actually being persecuted, imprisoned, and robbed by the state, as well as the scavengers who make their living from picking clean the bones of the kills the state has made?
/r/MensRights14/09/14 12:37 PM
1

I think it is quite common for over-privileged people to project their own victim complexes onto people who are actually victims, and this is the worst kind of victim-blaming, because it discredits the victim as it blames them.
/r/MensRights14/09/14 12:33 PM
1

Wow, that's terrible. My stepmother didn't go that far, she was classier than that. Most of her abuse was emotional and had to do with control and discipline, which I think she occasionally took beyond practical boundaries because she was transferring her dislike of my mother onto me. So it definitely was emotionally damaging to my confidence, and probably my opinion of women in general, but she stopped short of actual physical abuse. It didn't help that Dad put her in charge of disciplining me,…
/r/MensRights14/09/14 12:30 PM
1

I feel you on the abusive stepmother thing. To them, you represent their husband's last wife, and you are a competitor for her children's provider's resources, so it's a natural enemy kinda situation. As for joint custody, few people understand that either. I got to be with my Dad in the suburbs every other week, so I know what that's like, but there was this whole other world on the other side of town I was also a part of... Most people don't understand that kind of perspective. And when the ri…
/r/MensRights13/09/14 06:48 AM
1

I really try not to contribute to female privilege, but there will always be some sucker who will. And I honestly believe that it's the sucker safety net that enables a lot of women to avoid growing the way they should. But why would you put all the responsibility on men for creating that when it takes two to tango? You are only as reliant on privilege as you choose to be. If equality is what you truly want, why allow yourself to be dependent upon men when you could just as easily cultivate the …
/r/MensRights13/09/14 04:59 AM
1

I don't really care if females reject me. Most of them have valid personal reasons for doing so that aren't obvious until we've gotten to know eachother. And I've done the same thing to women, because I too have very specific standards. I figure if anyone rejects anyone, it wasn't meant to be, unless that rejection was based on misperceptions of eachother. Then it might be worth going back and taking a closer look. I've been with enough incompatible matches, so, at this point in my life, I'm rea…
/r/MensRights13/09/14 03:51 AM
2

What I have found is that when we use relationships to social climb, we end up with incompatible partners. The best relationships are between people who come from even ground, and yet female hypergamy often causes women to attempt to marry outside their class, and then be surprised when the relationship fails because the people involved have conflicting perspectives and values caused by different upbringings. So, to go even steven is really in a woman's best interest, although there are many wom…
/r/MensRights13/09/14 01:29 AM
2

When it promotes equality, yes. However, I honestly think that feminism and masculism are divisive labels, and prefer to think of myself as a humanist.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 11:13 PM
1

Yeah didn't really intend this to be a complaint about my romantic life. I actually care a lot more about the fact that Jada-Pinkett Smith was gifted a stylist, producer, PR people, and the megaphone of major label distribution simply because of nepotism, the aristocracy of pull, and good old fashioned socio-economic classism. While a more under-privileged musician was not given any of that support, even in the form of a social introduction to the kind of people who could help him develop and em…
/r/MensRights12/09/14 11:08 PM
1

I'm really not the one that keeps bringing it up, or rationalizing social mistreatment of those who may not deserve it by stereotypically assigning someone a privilege stigma which may very well be undeserved.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 10:51 PM
2

I consider myself more liberal than conservative, but that doesn't cause me to buy into the delusion that liberals are not biased or there is no such thing as liberal bias. My-side bias. Which you yourself have proven when you decided to stop reading because you heard a buzzword you didn't like, without even attempting to fully comprehend the ideas being discussed.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 10:50 PM
2

BTW, here is a blog written about female privilege, which has been posted here before, but I don't know if you caught it: http://jtourdet.wordpress.com/2013/09/12/sugar-spice-and-everything-nice-the-rise-of-female-privilege-in-western-society/
/r/MensRights12/09/14 10:29 PM
-1

I agree in principle. In the 90's, selling oneself as the underdog or the rebellious cause became a marketing tactic. That doesn't mean there aren't under-privileged white Republican Christians, though. I actually believe that my father and mother represent the whole spectrum of over- to under- privileged conservatives. My Dad is a rich lawyer in it for the tax breaks, but my Mom is a poor opera singer who just happens to be an ideological Christian. She came from poverty and has never had much …
/r/MensRights12/09/14 10:25 PM
2

thanks for publishing this thought, it brought up some angles I had not fully considered.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 10:21 PM
1

Thanks for the link. I had heard that term but never extensively researched it.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 07:01 PM
0

No, it's really just the idea of debunking liberal biases that hurt both men and whites. There are ethnic women in the upper class, who deliberately keep the class system alive because it benefits them, and there are under-privileged white males who have been the victim of systemic oppression their whole lives.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 06:41 PM
3

I mean, seriously, "I whip my hair back and forth"? Why was this given national attention? Because a conceited, spoiled little girl wanted to be a star, and rich Daddy pulled strings to make it happen.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 06:38 PM
5

Why would you assume I haven't already? I am a self-taught computer programmer. I am also a self-taught independent musician. But Will Smith's daughter, who was born into wealth and music industry connections, was gifted a musical career, while far superior musicians went hungry, enjoying privilege despite the fact that she is a black woman. Just to put all this privilege police bruhaha in perspective.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 06:26 PM
4

You thought that feminists actually care about an egalitarian society? Ha! Silly rabbit, everyone knows liberal special interests only care about themselves!
/r/MensRights08/09/14 07:30 PM
1

Why would she bother listening to an argument that defeats her preconceived notions? That wouldn't be very smart.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 06:41 AM
1

I really appreciate the point you are making, assuming you are speaking satirically. Sometimes I envision people in my community bowing their heads in a chant circle, repeating mantras, trying to make something true that they want to be true, or trying to create a common public misperception. It certainly seems as though some sort of powwow has occurred in my absence when I find myself in the attendance of community gatherings.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 02:17 PM
1

I don't find the idea of being a john even remotely satisfying. It's one step above animal behavior, and the realm of the novice: 'practice girls', sexual training wheels... As a mind matures, it demands more from a heterosexual relationship than a mere meat puppet... and I think it's sad that some men have been convinced that nothing more exists than nihilistic hedonism simply because they have excluded themselves from the realm of meaningful relationships... the honest woman who wants an LTR i…
/r/TheRedPill10/05/14 04:08 PM
1

I don't think that kind of attitude really works for everyone or every situation.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/14 04:04 PM
1

I have no desire to make everyone equal, nor do I believe that would even be possible. I believe in equal rights and opportunity, but I don't believe that trashy bimbos are the equivalent to an educated man with a career any more than I believe that 5 years olds can fly airplanes simply by virtue of citizenship. But that doesn't mean I subscribe to a bunch of fascist victim-blaming Randroid crap either.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/14 04:03 PM
1

Just by exposing people to the idea and allowing them to realize the sociocultural benefit of it. Things change over time. We used to ride in steam trains, now we ride in aeroplanes. That didn't happen over night. Someone had to sell the idea of an airplane to a bunch of people who helped build it because they thought it was a good idea worthy of development. And they had to defend that idea against a bunch of narrow-minded people who thought it could never happen.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/14 02:42 PM
1

It's actually an extremely small change to existing social norms, and I think resistance to the idea shows how stuck in a traditional American cultural mindstate most Americans are. I don't think that typically American sexual fascist or capitalistically exploitative ideas about male/female relations are "hard wired" into our brains at all. I think they are reinforced by social norms with are consensually flexible. Just look at dating in Europe or India... The rules are a little bit different ev…
/r/TheRedPill10/05/14 02:39 PM
0

Hah. OK. I didn't realize you live in a place, or perhaps merely a state of mind, where dating and prostitution are one and the same. And I suppose that segments of society are like that where I'm from, but I wouldn't want anything to do with them. I would consider that kinda 'low rent', to use a particularly apt turn of phrase. In the south, where antiquated notions of chivalry still yet persist, paying really just makes you the schmuck, as it is very common to pay for an expensive series of da…
/r/TheRedPill10/05/14 02:15 PM
-1

Wow, uh, OK, I think your dogmatic adherence to rhetoric that sounds like it came out of some kind of "Habits of Highly Effective People" book is kinda sad, and I hope some day you will free your mind from such oppressive belief systems and see the world as it truly is: infinite. And then you can be a free spirit instead of a biological machine living out a scripted drama.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/14 01:49 PM
0

You're thinking in terms of middle-aged adults with well-established identities and lives. What about younger people who don't quite "know who they are" yet? Dating is often the way to figuring oneself out by contrasting with others through relating to them, and that is a process which often continues through college and even into early career establishment.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/14 01:38 PM
0

I suppose it's just a matter of what parents decide to teach the next generation.
/r/TheRedPill10/05/14 01:37 PM
1

Defensive, aren't we? I didn't know douchebags have feelings...
/r/TheRedPill16/10/13 05:57 PM
1

I don't care enough about what you think to allow you to manipulate my ego with petty insults, cretin.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/13 05:47 PM
1

Psychopathology is genetically inherent, sociopathology is learned. This was in the first paragraph of my essay. You are forgetting the example of the woman who fucks a guy for his genetic material but settles with a different guy for his resources: often times betas raise children that aren't their own. As far as the morally bankrupt possessing all the wealth, that is a Marxist debate and this probably isn't the forum for it. I'm sure you can guess my side of the issue.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/13 05:13 PM
1

I do work out. When I ride my bike. Instead of driving a car fueled by blood and tyranny. Don't accuse me of not walking my talk. I fight losing battles and sacrifice for my ideals constantly. It takes true inner strength, something you might be unfamiliar with.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/13 05:10 PM
-1

So in other words, you have pretty much abandoned social conscience and responsibility by choosing to be willfully ignorant of the effects your actions have on the world. That's what I would expect from a Red Piller, and you have only proven my point.
/r/TheRedPill16/10/13 05:09 PM
1

Or perhaps it will biologically unsustainable to NOT band together as we try to save Earth from environmental devastation by engineering new technology and conquering new frontiers in space? Perhaps the rules of the game are changing, and we shouldn't want to get left in the dust!
/r/TheRedPill15/10/13 11:53 PM
1

I dunno... appellant could try to take it Federal with a writ of certiorari, but it's a Texas law in question so that would really be stretching. But right now I'm just trying to raise awareness. These laws curtailing free speech are bullshit and cases like these are becoming more and more common.
/r/TheRedPill11/10/13 01:53 PM
2

The appeal was declined, so they didn't even read it. The plaintiff's counsel probably coerced them, as this is quite common in Texas courts. PS: I am Justin W. Smith. Hear me roar. Bitch.
/r/TheRedPill10/10/13 05:46 PM
-3

That's a very lassiez-faire, rather than a progressive, attitude.
/r/TheRedPill08/10/13 09:26 AM
1

I do have those things. I also have some baggage from a life of adventure. But I'm not attracted to women my age, especially those who have been around more than me. I worked my way through college and didn't have a lot of time for women or dating. I spent a lot of time single. So the women my age tend to have a lot more experience than me, but haven't aged as well. Also, I find that women who aren't married by my age tend to be either ugly, crazy, or not LTR material. I have no desire to cultiv…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 09:07 PM
1

I'm in my 30's and the tables still have not turned for me. But that's probably because I look really young.
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 07:44 PM
1

I agree. Correlation is not causation. There are certainly plenty of girls who have gone into all their relationships with the best of intentions, and simply got screwed around by douchebags until they finally met a white knight. But how much of that is the douchebags' fault, and how much is simply the woman's poor character judgment? It is really easy for the woman to say, post-hoc, that men 'took advantage of her', but in the modern era, now more than ever, the decision to take a relationship …
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 07:18 PM
3

yeah, OK. I hear you. But you have to remember that, statistically, someone who sleeps with a lot of people is less likely to have a successful marriage. It's a question of a person's nature... no ring or ceremony will change the nature of a slut. There are people who are sentimental about sex and relationships, and people who aren't. A leopard is not likely to change it's spots. There doesn't come a point in life where a slutty person (man or woman) is likely to say: "I'm done being promiscuous…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 06:52 PM
3

I personally believe that the more partners one has had, the less meaningful their relationships are. If my partner has had a lot of lovers, I would say that it kind of ruins the intimacy. I don't like the idea of other men knowing the experience of making love to my partner. Ideally, I would love to marry a virgin, however, since I'm not a virgin, I accept the sexual pasts of potential mates... but 9 is a little high. I personally would not marry any woman who had been with more than 5 or 10 pe…
/r/TheRedPill30/09/13 03:35 PM
6

My response to the article (which I posted): "I wouldn't consider a girl who had banged 9 dudes marriage material. I think at that point, you have pretty much typecast yourself as a fuck-toy, and you'll never be marriage material, ever. Sincerely, A really hot, interesting guy with tons of money"
/r/TheRedPill29/09/13 10:13 PM
-3

This totally confirms the conclusions drawn by my newest blog: http://jtourdet.wordpress.com/2013/09/12/sugar-spice-and-everything-nice-the-rise-of-female-privilege-in-western-society/
/r/TheRedPill18/09/13 05:53 PM
1

LoL I was actually considering titling this "Check your female privilege" just so people wouldn't make the PPG ref
/r/MensRights13/09/13 08:27 PM
1

I hadn't thought to include circumcision. The others I thought I at least touched on, if not explicitly then implicitly. Honestly writing this was a fight to be concise but still thorough.
/r/MensRights12/09/13 07:12 PM
1

Did I leave anything out?
/r/MensRights12/09/13 05:54 PM
-2

there are several overweight, ugly, dumb, or slutty girls in my friend zone. They all have their uses. But I would never think of banging them.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/13 11:08 PM
1

Attacking my knowledge of feminist scholarship is not addressing my points. Nor is it addressing the many inconsistencies within that "breadth". And your denial of waves is denying the fact that every generation of feminists has set out to accomplish certain goals, then once those goals were accomplished, subsequent generations moved the goalposts back another few yards.
/r/MensRights17/08/13 03:31 AM
2

so you're choosing not to acknowledge the total 180 feminists did when they came up with "sex positive" feminism? There was a book written about this, called "Female Chauvinist Pigs". By a woman. What about the hypocrisy of child support? Why should a woman's choice be a man's responsibility? Finally, isn't chivalry privilege? How can privilege and equality co-exist when they are, by definition, antithetical?
/r/MensRights17/08/13 03:02 AM
1

cheaterville.com for anyone incapable of fidelity
/r/TheRedPill22/07/13 09:59 PM
2

I don't care what a friend looks like. I only care what abilities he has and how interesting he is. I'll be friends with a woman I'm not attracted to because she is interesting or has abilities I admire as well.
/r/MensRights22/07/13 05:41 PM
1

I would and have turned down all kinds of women, and even been called gay for it. The problem is, the pretty ones are too mean and the nice ones are too ugly. Then you have girls who are both mean and ugly. I don't know how they ever get laid.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 04:32 PM
5

I'm not too big into TRP, but I must say I thoroughly enjoyed this thread and actually agree with most of what has been said here.
/r/TheRedPill05/07/13 04:16 PM
1

BWAH-ha, the virgin scam. I'll believe it when I see the blood!
/r/TheRedPill04/06/13 06:45 PM
1

Rather than think this guy is a tool, I just think the girl is a bitch.
/r/TheRedPill20/05/13 08:21 PM
1

I agree, but who is the judge? Why would you assume that it's her judging me? Why can't I be the judge of her? Maybe I have standards. Not just for appearance, but mental/personality standards. In other words, stuff that wouldn't just be superficially apparent at first glance. I'm sorry, but this subreddit seems like a lot of effort to try and get chicks to like you. I would say the amount of work and thought you are putting into getting women only proves that you care more abou them than they c…
/r/TheRedPill15/05/13 10:09 PM
0

who cares? why care what someone else thinks? maybe they should care what YOU think! For years, I was stumped whenever women cattily told me "Your neediness is so unattractive." I'm very proud to have come up with this counter. Stick dem hos right in the stenopool.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/13 05:55 PM
3

I don't understand the assumption that, because I refuse to jump through all these hoops in order to be attractive to women, I'm some kind of failure. Don't you see the compromise you're making? There's all this emphasis on what men need to do to be attractive to women, but we've lost sight of what women need to do to be attractive to us! What if I'M NOT ATTRACTED to conceited little girls who can't make their own decisions? I'm a man who has really high standards. And most of them are mental. I…
/r/TheRedPill15/05/13 03:23 AM
6

Honestly, I don't put pussy on a pedestal. I leave it lying on the ground because most times, it's not worth picking up. You're the one putting all this effort out to get laid. I simply have more important things to do.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/13 02:25 AM
-1

Here, I just finished my blog on this. Some of it is rerun: http://jtourdet.wordpress.com/2013/05/15/why-women-should-start-pursuing-men/
/r/TheRedPill15/05/13 02:05 AM
0

I said I was raised a Zen Buddhist, not that I adhere to it in adulthood. Though I have abandoned the faith, it taught me many useful cognitive tools. The one I prize most is willpower.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/13 02:04 AM
1

You can have all the nasty, used up hos you want, and I wouldn't consider you the winner for getting that or myself the loser for giving it up. I want a virtuous woman to love me and tell everyone else to go fuck themselves. And I want her to be the hottest woman on the planet, hot enough to put all your cheap tramps to shame.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/13 01:20 AM
0

What can I say except that I'm a militant beta. As an anarchist, I refuse to rule or be ruled.
/r/TheRedPill15/05/13 01:16 AM
0

there will be more for you until women learn the concept of selection bias and realize that the men who pursue them are all douchebags, and in order to get a quality man, they might have to step outside their comfort zone.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/13 09:51 PM
0

Yeah, I know myself well enough to know I'm a relationship guy. I don't find having my sexual partner be a wild card to be at all fulfilling or satisfying, and yes, I have tried it.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/13 09:15 PM
1

But if I'm the right man, shouldn't I be worth it to her? You have to understand, I've pursued many women quite successfully. I've just found that it never lead to the type of relationship I wanted. There is also a question of my feelings of entitlement. Having pursued several women in my life, is it really too much to ask that one should pursue me?
/r/TheRedPill14/05/13 09:14 PM
3

I'm just saying, sexual satisfaction is something I could dial up on red tube, escort service, or even in the bar/dating scene. But emotional satisfaction is so much more rare, hence I both prize it, and am a little starved for it.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/13 09:00 PM
0

Of course it does. THe point is that they hold back. They hold back because tell eachother to 'make him work for it'. If one of them breaks rank and pursues a man, they call her a slut, even if she never pursues men, and is only making an exception for a guy she really likes. Slutty girls are a threat to the female sexual monopoly. This catty prioritization of feminism over the core liberal values of inclusion in society, is just sick, in that it discourages not just basic compassion, but the fo…
/r/TheRedPill14/05/13 08:51 PM
3

But that's beside the point. What about what you want, emotionally. Isn't that important? Why should you sacrifice your emotions just to get laid? That is the mark of someone who thinks more with his reptillian brain, rather than having a well-developed cerebral cortex.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/13 08:50 PM
1

I was raised a Zen Buddhist, and your pathetic attempts to manipulate my ego will not work. Sorry.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/13 08:48 PM
0

yeah she's not really my type =D
/r/TheRedPill14/05/13 08:39 PM
3

I would not find a woman attracted to aggression attractive.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/13 08:39 PM
3

I agree, but the point is, why should I put myself out. Why is any woman worth it? I feel like the only way to achieve true gender equality is to destroy a lot of the social constructs that govern inter-gender relations. And what I'm suggesting isn't all that cruel. It is simply a "What is good for the goose is good for the gander." This is after all, what they have been doing to us for years, via their borg-like hivemind groupthink. As a proud union member, there's nothing I like more than a ge…
/r/TheRedPill14/05/13 08:32 PM
5

Men, try this experiment out. For one year, do not initiate any conversation with a woman (unless it is necessary for business, of course). In other words, do not speak to women unless spoken to. At the end of this year, you will draw one of two conclusions: 1) Women are very bashful and generally don't tend to approach men very often. 2) Women are conceited jerks, and unless you are fawning all over them, you are basically invisible to them. Although sometimes, conclusion 1 is what is going on,…
/r/TheRedPill14/05/13 08:26 PM
0

I agree with you to a certain extent, but there is only so much emotional fulfillment that a man can generate alone. I will refer you to Maslow's pyramid of needs.
/r/TheRedPill14/05/13 08:25 PM
2

In most cases you are correct. However, I consider myself in a higher cognitive class and seek the company of the same.
/r/askTRP02/05/13 11:31 PM
13

Yeah, the funny thing is that most of the responders immeadiately made these assumption that I'm some kind of fat pimply loser who lives in his mom's basement and has never even held hands with a girl. The truth is, I have a ton of female friends, I've had several intimate relationships in life, I'm a cool guy who I would say is resonably attractive, not overweight, college educated with a good salaried job in web development. I also have a really good personality, play guitar, and am far from b…
/r/askTRP02/05/13 10:12 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter