TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JCurry2 Archive

View 6 posts and 157 comments by JCurry2 on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Thanks for the reply Justin. Very surprised/pleased with this decision. I agree that the healing process is facilitated by fostering a family atmosphere and glad you guys came to that conclusion. Keep up the great work.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 05:27 PM
11

I do remember there was a CBC panel on "should men's rights groups exist on campus?" debate and Jonathan was the only one who defended their right to exist. He stated he wasn't an expert on Men's rights but he was the sole voice of reason on the panel.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 04:01 PM
2

Yeah it will be interesting to hear Justin's view on this. Honestly I'm assuming they went with a "Men Only" model but I'd be interested to hear if they contemplated including women and what swayed their opinion.
/r/MensRights28/12/17 02:47 PM
6

I do appreciate your response but I wanted Justin's input. I'm not saying I think they should accept both. I was merely asking if they are and what kind of questions did they have to ask themselves to come up with their stance. Maybe they weighed both options and found roadblocks. Of course there are a ton of women's shelters in Canada and I honestly don't see a reason why this shouldn't be just a "Men's only" shelter but I wanted to hear Justin's opinion.
/r/MensRights27/12/17 11:02 PM
19

Just wanted to start off by saying thanks. As someone who is interested in Mensrights I find a lot of groups to be more focused on "anti-feminism" instead of issues that face men and I think Café makes the perfect balance. My question is do you plan on making your shelter accessible to abused women as well or is it going to be men only and what went into your decision to make it that way?
/r/MensRights27/12/17 06:14 PM
3

https://www.amazon.ca/Red-Pill-Blu-ray-Import/dp/B01LTI0BKA/ref=sr_1_2_twi_blu_2?ie=UTF8&qid=1488836245&sr=8-2&keywords=the+red+pill
/r/MensRights06/03/17 09:38 PM
2

Ordered it off of .ca
/r/MensRights06/03/17 07:09 PM
1

Care to explain what this has to do with men's rights? Honestly a great way to make headway in the publics eyes is to champion Ezra's views! /s
/r/MensRights09/12/15 07:44 PM
1

I agree since I'm a "left-leaning" MRA.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 10:16 PM
2

Noticed there is already an active thread on this and I can't seem to delete on my iPad so I would appreciate some down votes so this doesn't pollute the subreddit.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 04:58 AM
2

Sorry just noticed. I'll delete.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 04:53 AM
4

It was Jonathan Kay and according to his Twitter he doesn't support men's rights but is more on the side against censorship.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 04:51 AM
1

Just google her name and university of Ottawa
/r/MensRights15/05/14 03:53 AM
8

Troll likes to troll
/r/MensRights02/05/14 07:41 PM
1

I would disagree with your assessment. I don't think anyone has every alluded to a woman holding them down and raping them. Most of the time it is coercion or sex while intoxicated.
/r/MensRights02/05/14 01:19 PM
1

Ok thanks for the reply!
/r/MensRights01/05/14 06:35 PM
1

Are these podcasts no longer being updated on AVFM? I haven't seen the Janice Fiamengo one come up yet and it has been two months since I've seen a new one. If it helps I'm using the podkicker app on my phone.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 06:00 PM
0

Looking at the vitriol you post on a daily basis is evidence enough for me. Go hug a puppy or something.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 04:30 PM
0

So since I call myself an MRA do I have to take responsibility for people like you? Telling people to kill themselves when you disagree and that all feminists should die? Just look at your posting history. You are an unhappy individual and I disagree with your above comment because I don't think you represent the MRA movement.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 02:00 PM
2

Did you even click the link? It says that it found that 46% of the time women were the ones doing the raping. But I stick to my original point.....I'm sure the victims could care less and having it be a man or a women doesn't diminish the pain caused.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 01:27 PM
2

http://equalitycanada.com/ You should look into them. They are my favorite. They actual do real world work (raising funds to open a mens shelter) and they are also the group responsible for all the talks posted here. (Warren Farrel, Janice Fiamengo, Miles Groth) On an unrelated tangent if you have any questions about Calgary (camping spots, breakfast places.....etc) feel free to ask.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 01:24 PM
2

Funny because I actually prefer the one in Toronto called CAFE
/r/MensRights01/05/14 04:03 AM
4

Unrelated but since you are a fellow Calgary native have you looked into Mensrightscalgary? They are an offshoot of the Edmonton chapter. Not sure what to think of them myself.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 07:52 PM
5

Agreed but by posting it the way you did it comes across as insensitive (hence the downvotes). And if you look at the subtitle is says that the rape perpetrators are often women.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 07:36 PM
6

Once again I think you need to look up the meaning of the term "White Knight" as you are using it incorrectly.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 07:30 PM
1

I'll answer since no one else seems to be stepping up to the plate. Supposedly she was suing because the family was suing her. She was found to not be at fault because of multiple reasons. I guess the police found her not responsible because the bikers were wearing dark clothing at night with only one of the three bikes having adequate reflectors. Also they weren't wearing helmets (not sure about he local laws but lots of places here have mandatory helmet laws). So she was found to not be crimin…
/r/MensRights30/04/14 07:18 PM
8

I'm a white knight because I'm defending a male rape victim? I know the nuances of the word "your" is hard to grasp but I thought the definition of "White Knight" would be easier.
/r/MensRights30/04/14 07:11 PM
8

Thought I would just copy-pasta from an equally insensitive post below Think about it from the victims point of view. Does the gender of their attacker take away or add to their pain? Rape victims are rape victims hands down. Why is it you can say "Don't ask what she was wearing" in the same breath you say something like "well the rapist was a man"? Don't both comments do avoidable damage to the victim?
/r/MensRights30/04/14 07:07 PM
7

Poor use of "Your" and mentioning a fedora all the while belittling a rape victim.............slow clap.............you win the internet!
/r/MensRights30/04/14 06:55 PM
25

Think about it from the victims point of view. Does the gender of their attacker take away or add to their pain? Rape victims are rape victims hands down. Why is it you can say "Don't ask what she was wearing" in the same breath you say something like "well the rapist was a man"? Don't both comments do avoidable damage to the victim?
/r/MensRights30/04/14 03:58 PM
3

Not sure why you were downvoted. This doesn't have much to do with this subreddit. As Grainier said above she is actually just counter-suing. It was a sad case of an accident where the person who did the killing was found to not be at fault because of the conditions of the accident. She is counter-suing because the family is suing her.
/r/MensRights29/04/14 03:09 PM
0

Don't feel compelled to talk about the suicide post?
/r/MensRights25/04/14 08:01 PM
0

Not really just love getting you to talk more. The more you post idiotic statements the less people will believe you represent this sub. That is unless you delete all your posts like you did when you said you wanted me to find my girlfriend hanging from the rafters.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 07:52 PM
0

Troll likes to troll
/r/MensRights25/04/14 07:47 PM
1

Would you say people who always end their debates with telling people they should die or that they are cancers or that you hope they watch their SO kill them self are helpful to the MRM?
/r/MensRights25/04/14 07:22 PM
1

Once again you indirectly admit the limitation of your engagement in Men's rights ends at trolling on the internet and insulting people who are actually doing something just because they don't hate the same people as you.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 07:21 PM
1

Good job avoiding the question. I'll assume all you do is troll the internet thinking it is helpful.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 06:57 PM
1

From the same group "When Men’s Rights Activists (MRAs) discuss anti-feminism, we are talking about gender feminists, not equity feminists. A gender feminist is a feminist who follows a gynocentric and misandric branch of feminism, criticizing only men for the social issues we face today, and supporting their arguments with flawed assertions about universal female oppression, while ignoring any female privileges. An equity feminist is a person who believes in equality for everyone regardless of …
/r/MensRights25/04/14 06:56 PM
1

Can your observation of reality read? Honest question since you seem to not get that despite your bias all these groups say they aren't anti-feminist just critical of feminism when they should be. Wondering how much you actually contribute to promoting men's right other then telling people that you hope their girlfriend kills them self? I'm a member of CAFE which is taking donations to build Canada's only men's shelter. So I am supporting "real-world" change. What are you doing?
/r/MensRights25/04/14 06:53 PM
1

So if I pay attention I'll know you are right instead of looking at the mandates of all these men's rights groups? I literally gave you the links proving these groups say they aren't anti-feminist and you counter with "if you pay attention to reality". Who is the real obstacle?
/r/MensRights25/04/14 06:47 PM
2

You are anti-feminist. Don't speak for the whole group. I'm not anti-feminist. I'm a donor to CAFE in Toronto so I am a bonafide MRA seeing as how I've put my money where my keyboard is. So I'm an example of a MRA who isn't anti-feminist. Does feminism negatively affect men's rights in some ways? Yes Do I agree with all aspects of feminism? No Am I anti-feminist? No
/r/MensRights25/04/14 06:45 PM
2

http://mensrightscalgary.com/anti-feminism/ http://www.mensrightsedmonton.com/anti-feminism/ http://equalitycanada.com/about/frequently-asked-questions/ Just to prove my point.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 06:41 PM
1

If you read the FAQ on the sidebar you even see this subreddit doesn't claim to be anti-feminist. Read the mandate of CAFE (puts on Warren Farrell talk and Janice Fiamengo) and they state they aren't anti-feminist. Read the mandate of mensrightsedmonton and even they state as long as you are an equity feminist they aren't against you. There is a difference between calling out feminism when it does things that negatively affects men and being an anti-feminist troll. On a side note this troll also…
/r/MensRights25/04/14 06:32 PM
17

I think this is the best response especially the part about being critical of Feminism. I think there is a difference between being anti-feminist and being critical of parts of feminism that contribute to issues the MHRM cares about. I think one problem of trying to explain the MHRM is that it is still in its infancy so there are lots of examples of people who are strictly anti-feminist and believe they are trying to create a matriarchy and there are those of us who believe feminism is mainly a …
/r/MensRights25/04/14 05:01 PM
1

unbannable9412 is just a menrights troll. Look at his post history. There are plenty of MRAs who aren't anti-feminist.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 02:19 PM
1

Oh good, I'd love to hear her side of it. I emailed her to thank her for her Queen's University talk and she sounded sad at the reaction at UofO talk when she replied.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 06:34 PM
2

For reference Canada is trying to push through a private members bill that would make "shared parenting" the default in all custody cases unless it isn't in the best interest of the child.
/r/MensRights22/04/14 05:31 PM
1

Too!
/r/MensRights17/04/14 02:34 PM
3

I believe even 21 year olds learn more english than this!
/r/MensRights16/04/14 09:39 PM
3

You missed a comma!
/r/MensRights16/04/14 07:34 PM
12

I don't think people should be judged based on their age. You could say that maybe this person hasn't lived a full life yet in order to make a stand but you have no idea what they have gone through. Plus it is "You're"!
/r/MensRights16/04/14 05:32 PM
4

Figured I'll give my two cents. Once I found out that two friends who I had recently met went through a crazy custody battle with their exes. Both guys are super-dads, responsible and amazing friends. Hearing what they went through made me question the gender differences in the court system. Once of the friend's exes was a drug addict and seeing how much money he had to spend just to get partial custody was ridiculous. The feminist viewpoint is that the patriarchy explains this difference becaus…
/r/MensRights14/04/14 02:28 PM
-4

Technically a man kidnaps him. Honestly wondering if this deserves to be on the "top" list of this subreddit.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 02:34 AM
-1

Your point of view is the university is acting like a police station with regards to a police officer under investigation which means it is just about politics. I agree. But I also think there is a big picture debate to be had about why we automatically treat alleged sexual assault perpetrators like they are guilty right away? Just an interesting subject.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 07:20 PM
-3

No worries. I hate that this subreddit gets "downvote heavy" when they disagree. Redditique says you downvote when a person isn't adding to the conversation and you were adding your perspective which I actually agree with but I think there is something in this case that relates to men's rights.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 07:18 PM
-15

And here is the eloquent purveyor of all things "Men's Rights". Grace us with your wisdom!
/r/MensRights02/04/14 06:30 PM
0

I'm usually one to point out threads that aren't on topic but I think this one has a point to be made. By just being associated with this allegation a person is stigmatized. I remember reading something awhile back where in the UK there was a case where people in sexual assault cases were fighting to keep their names confidental because there was a push to release names of the accused in these cases. This does have some relevance to men's rights in a round about way since men are more often the …
/r/MensRights02/04/14 06:29 PM
2

Watch the Queen's University one to see her message. There are lots of explanations as to why the protesters did what they did and I don't like to speculate too much. I do know that a prominant campus feminist who was working against this talk was attacked days before this talk which could have motivated this response.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 03:31 PM
2

That's really nice of you. I was contemplating asking her to do an AMA on here but not sure how it would be received. It was interesting to note the difference between the Queen's university reception and the Ottawa U one. My girlfriend says she wasn't suprised as she went to UofO.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 06:22 PM
1

Yeah I checked it out. I think the crazy stat is men are only allowed in 8% of the shelters in Canada and even then sometimes they have only a couple alotted beds.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 06:15 PM
3

Ahhhh now I see the difference then. One is based on a survey asked if they were abused (2009) and one is based on police reports of reported abuse (2010). I like to have a firm grasp on the numbers because too often the message behind the numbers gets drowned in a sea of debate about the validity of the claims.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 05:38 PM
1

I just did my own research and found that in 2010 there were 593 shelters in Canada (publicly funded) and of those 593, 8% of them accepted men as well. As of today there are no "men-only" shelters. And in 2010 statscan reported that men are the victims in 30% of family violence crimes. Not sure where the 49.3% came from. Just adding my research to this. All my numbers come from statscan. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85-002-x/2011001/article/11495-eng.htm http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/85-224-x/85…
/r/MensRights31/03/14 04:35 PM
5

I actually mentioned in my note to her that she is especially brave because she is faculty at UofO and willing to talk on a subject that will most likely make her job harder for her to do.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 02:45 PM
9

For the record here are the links from her talks; http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3azaMn2a4bA&list=UU7PfGhJXlJiDs4jvGGGgqsQ - Queen's University http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOnuZsXRwTA&list=UU7PfGhJXlJiDs4jvGGGgqsQ - Ottawa university (this gets shutdown due to protest) And here is her email [email protected]
/r/MensRights31/03/14 02:21 PM
2

[email protected] Just sent her an email thanking her for her speech and bravery in doing so in a hostile environment. I would recommend others do the same!
/r/MensRights28/03/14 06:39 PM
17

That's some great acting. Really believed the character.
/r/MensRights27/03/14 05:34 PM
1

Yeah! another person posting about CAFE
/r/MensRights25/03/14 08:12 PM
0

Sending e-hugs your way!
/r/MensRights24/03/14 08:32 PM
3

This is what this troll wrote the other day. Like his way of thinking is the end-all be-all of Men's Rights. "It's a good thing RES has tags, so I can continue to give pieces of shit like you hell until you either get with the program, or get lost."
/r/MensRights21/03/14 08:45 PM
2

Don't bother debating him. He gets fed up then spouts nonsense about how sub-human you are and how you should die. He is a troll and a bane to Mensrights!
/r/MensRights21/03/14 08:18 PM
2

If you get one thing about this post look up the "Tender Years Doctrine" and read about it. It kinda is fair to attribute custody problems to early feminism. (this coming from a pro-feminist MRA)
/r/MensRights21/03/14 07:43 PM
0

She isn't that good with knots. Why delete your first post where you wish my girlfriend dies to only post it again? It was more eloquent the second time I must admit!
/r/MensRights21/03/14 07:25 PM
0

I hope your WOW account gets banned. There, we both said things we regret. Now let's apologize and hug it out.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 07:22 PM
2

I think you are going to find a complete spectrum of opinions here because mensrights isn't exactly a institutional movement yet. My personal opinion is that feminism has done amazing things in the past and is continuing to do amazing things for women. I don't believe in the "trickle-down" effect of gender issues in that if we solve woman's issues then we solve men's issues which is why I think this movement is needed. I also don't believe that the system is setup for the benefit of men by men. …
/r/MensRights21/03/14 06:44 PM
2

Obvious troll is obvious!
/r/MensRights21/03/14 06:29 PM
2

If I could give you more than one upvote I would.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 07:30 PM
1

Couldn't upvote this more. I have a woman now who debates with me about the topics on this sub and we have both enlightened eachother about gender issues. There are a heck of a lot of good women out there (as well as men) and don't let the constant negative topics change your opinion of an entire gender.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 02:58 PM
2

You don't know how many times in the past two weeks I've had this conversation with people. The moderates need to make their voices heard or the fringe elements take over.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 04:02 PM
4

Hopefully you got that I was talking about unbannable9412 and not you. Had a terrible debate with him yesterday and have come to the realization that he is just a troll.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 03:50 PM
2

I still think this article has no relevancy to mensrights but I admit the discussion it has created probably is useful. I would label any guy as "crazy" or "idiot" if they light their significant others car on fire for such stupid issue. My point is that we can't draw any conclusions from such a small article other than this isn't an appropriate reaction if this is indeed the reason she freaked out. I still don't see how this is a mensrights issue. If we learned that she got a lighter sentence t…
/r/MensRights19/03/14 03:48 PM
2

I think you make a good point but we can't make any distinctions based on such a small article and that is my point. This isn't a men's rights issue because there is nothing to learn from this post. The woman acted like an idiot and proves there are idiots in this world. Do we know why she acted like an idiot? No! which is why this article doesn't really add anything to this discussion.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 02:44 PM
0

I think this guy needs a hug!
/r/MensRights19/03/14 02:14 PM
3

Had an equally engaging conversation with him yesterday. Just ignore him. If the moderates here keep their voices loud people like him will just move on.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 02:11 PM
5

Don't respect this guy. He doesn't respect you. For some reason he thinks that his definition of "mensrights" is the way it has to be. Let him rant and hopefully he just moves over to that subreddit and we can get down to the business of educating eachother on real men's issues.
/r/MensRights19/03/14 02:10 PM
1

Has already been asked. My first click; http://www.reddit.com/r/AskFeminists/comments/1yoke4/feminists_stance_and_view_on_the_new_trends_of/ "You'll be hard pressed to find any feminists who don't sympathise with male victims of dv"
/r/MensRights19/03/14 01:14 PM
0

Are you just a troll or are you seriously this frustrating on a daily basis? Do some good for men's rights and either engage in healthy debate as an adult or just don't post.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 09:17 PM
0

He/she wasn't saying "Man up". They were basically saying there is a better approach to this than going "tit for tat". Instead of engaging him/her in conversation you immediately told them to fuck off. Learn to communicate as an adult.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 08:31 PM
1

Please point out where I said "Man up"? I literally just posted a video on this sub yesterday about a doc saying how this is a problem.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 08:17 PM
1

No, telling people "fuck you" for a perfectly reasonable response (although one you might diasgree with) is the reason this sub isn't taken seriously. Looking at your post history, you have told people to "kill themselves" and "fuck off" multiple times. It might be time to quit WOW and really take an introspective look into why you are so hateful. Seriously. You aren't a net-positive influence on this sub so you might want to question why you are so angry. Hope it works out for you.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 08:13 PM
0

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/20pwxj/why_do_people_look_down_on_rmensrights/
/r/MensRights18/03/14 07:41 PM
1

I think people like you give MRAs a bad name and this movement won't be taken seriously until moderates call you out on your BS. But that is just my delusional opinion.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 07:25 PM
1

I think you and I have a different definition of "factually correct".
/r/MensRights18/03/14 07:20 PM
0

I think you and I aren't going to convince eachother of our opinions.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 07:16 PM
3

What you should've pointed towards was the work of Erin Pizzey who opened a female abuse shelter and found out a lot of victims were also violent themselves and became ostracized by the local feminist groups when she pointed this out. But that was quite awhile ago and although the numbers of DV might be contested no level-headed individual (feminist or MRA) thinks it doesn't happen at all in both directions.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 06:59 PM
4

Although your evidence is quite compelling I would bet that you might be pointing at the fringe elements of a group and painting the whole group with that label. Kinda what we in Menrights hate when people point at theredpill and say that is representative of us.......something to think about.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 06:55 PM
7

I think it is a case of a crazy woman doing something crazy. Really nothing here at all that shows this should be in this sub. Maybe if she got off scott-free in a situation when a man wouldn't but this article has basically no information and leaves me questioning why people are even upvoting it.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 06:51 PM
4

What feminists deny that violence against men happens?
/r/MensRights18/03/14 06:50 PM
12

What does this have to do with "Men's Rights"? Serious question.
/r/MensRights18/03/14 06:29 PM
2

The one part of this preview I don't like is how the "Be a man", "Grow some balls" is only represented to be said by men. Other than that I agree with the message. FYI this was cross-posted from /r/feminism
/r/MensRights17/03/14 06:45 PM
1

Thanks for the response. I still hate the term privilege in this conversation. I would like to think of it as advantage and in that light there are for sure some areas when men would have an advantage over women just as there are areas when women have advantage over men. Totally discounting "female privilege" is just wrong.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 08:07 PM
1

Not sure if I do. Care to elaborate?
/r/MensRights12/03/14 08:00 PM
2

I think this is a really important point to make. This sub gets really upset (and understandibly so) when some feminists say that men are never victims. We wouldn't want to be on the same side of ignorance by stating that there aren't areas of society where it is beneficial being a man.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 07:59 PM
1

I think we are falling victim to semantics. When you say "there is no male privilege" you are meaning in a macro sense and I'm looking at it from a situation to situation sense which makes me disagree.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 07:55 PM
3

For the record I spent some time in Abu Dhabi and when I saw the Vice special on Dubai I could relate. Everyday you see busloads of crammed migrant workers coming into the city to work construction with little to no safety gear. Just outside of my place I saw a construction site where there were no gloves/helmets to be seen.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 07:29 PM
2

I would kindly disagree. Although I hate using the term "privilege" there are some advantages to being a man. There are also some disadvantages.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 07:27 PM
4

This is the kind of stuff I like to see on this sub. Not anti-feminist for the sake of being anti-feminist and actually doing something for a good cause. Kudos!
/r/MensRights12/03/14 07:22 PM
1

They (CAFE) aren't convinced anti-feminism is a problem I personally feel that way. There are many different types of feminists. There are true equity feminists who don't blame men for their problems and accept that men can be both privileged/victimized just as women can. Of course some things are done in the name of feminism that ends up hurting men but I feel that men have nothing to fear from level-headed, true-equity feminists. I just choose to support a mensrights group that doesn't take a …
/r/MensRights26/02/14 09:53 PM
1

http://equalitycanada.com/ In case you are lazy :)
/r/MensRights26/02/14 07:58 PM
2

There are quite a few. I had a hard time finding one that wasn't anti-feminist though which turned me off but CAFE in Toronto seems pretty good.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 07:25 PM
4

Told my girlfriend I was abused as a child........she hugged me..........test failed. People like you give fodder to the rest of reddit when they want to trash on mensrights. Have a downvote!
/r/MensRights18/02/14 08:35 PM
8

Just want to say two things. Really sorry this happened to you. You are better off without her. I realize this is a cliche that people say often but for years I've hidden the fact that I was abused as a child from my significant others because of my fear of them reacting the way your ex did. Now that I'm with a girl who knows what has happened to me and still loves me I realize that my fear was baseless because I would never want to be with someone who couldn't accept me for who I am (baggage an…
/r/MensRights18/02/14 08:26 PM
1

I'm sorry I just feel you are grasping at straws here. I think all the time the MRM gets sick at feminists calling sexism on every little thing and I think a post like this is just as bad. I totally agree with your right to post it I just think that it has little to do with the MRM and you are making a mountain out of a molehill.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 05:09 PM
1

You still have yet to answer the question. What is sexist about this? Please explain. Just because it comes from a site that has a history of sexism doesn't make it sexist. If Buzzfeed posts an article about the merits of brocolli does it make it sexist because they've previously posted sexist articles?
/r/MensRights13/02/14 04:35 PM
4

You still haven't explained why this is sexist. If the genders were reversed it would be the same. The photos would be funny and the fact that these athletes are superheroes would still ring true. This doesn't belong here.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 03:52 PM
2

Finally!
/r/MensRights13/02/14 03:29 PM
2

"If you remove the dudes from pairs skating, the ladies look like superheroes. Which they basically are. " How is this sexism even in the slightest? The pictures are just funny without other partner in it and of course these athletes are superheroes. This is a terrible post to this sub.
/r/MensRights13/02/14 03:26 PM
1

I'll just put it out there that not all MRAs are anti-feminist. I consider myself an egalitarian who is currently interested in the mensrights side of things because they have been less in the spotlight in the past. I tend to steer clear of anti-feminist posts/groups and agree that this subreddit sometimes loses its focus. I think there is a difference between an anti-feminist post and a post that is pointing out something harmful to the rights of men in the name of feminism and I would like to …
/r/MensRights06/02/14 08:23 PM
2

Just out of curiousity I tried to message this to a friend on facebook who is also interested in gender issues and facebook blocked the link saying this link is banned. Anyone have a similar issue?
/r/MensRights20/11/13 03:44 PM
1

I've actually made this arguement lots when debating circumcision. Everytime they post something about how circumcision lowers UTIs or HIV infection rates I ask. "If a study came out saying the same thing about FGM would you then change your mind about it?". This tends to have a great affect. The problem is that governments don't want/need to invest in the positive aspects of FGM (and rightly so) kinda reminds me of the problem with funding studies in the US on the benefits of Marijuana. As much…
/r/MensRights30/10/13 04:03 PM
1

No offence but reading into this poster as "My college appears to think rape is only male on female." seems like a stretch. Maybe they are just presenting one side. They aren't presenting male-male, female-male or female-female either.
/r/MensRights29/10/13 06:49 PM
0

In all honesty I think I would like to see this lecture because I remember getting my orientation ten years ago on sexual-assault/consent during my first year of university and will honestly admit that I did learn a bit from it (although I disagree this should only be taught to boys). Off the bat I think I would disagree with this speaker if he is citing that reason (and that reason only) for lower university attendance by men but this is just from my personal experience a decade ago. But I woul…
/r/MensRights27/09/13 07:27 PM
2

I agree. It is also a good venue for proving there are moderate, well-spoken people on both sides. Too often each side is characterized by fringe members who happen to have the loudest voices.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 05:44 PM
2

And for the record I'm actually a donating member of CAFE. I just feel that out of all the articles written about CAFE thus far that this is the least biased and doesn't really deserve the title "hit-piece".
/r/MensRights27/09/13 05:02 PM
6

I see your point. Unfortunatly Earl Silverman wasn't on the radar of MSM recently and the chants were. (that is another issue to be debated). I think that she was just pointing out that a recent "gender issue" was brought up at a canadian universtity. Could it have been completely left out? Of course. But if this is the worst part of the article I'd have to consider this a more balanced piece than CAFE usually gets. The one about the fundraising for the Men's shelter was much worse and hopefully…
/r/MensRights27/09/13 04:37 PM
-1

I actually found that to be pretty balanced.
/r/MensRights27/09/13 04:11 PM
2

Ok thanks for the heads up
/r/MensRights24/09/13 05:53 PM
2

ahhh not familiar with Manhood Academy
/r/MensRights24/09/13 05:37 PM
1

You honestly created an account just to post this? .........slow....clap.....
/r/MensRights24/09/13 05:35 PM
4

Hey dannis28383 brew your self a pot of tea. Sit down and click your user history on Reddit. 1/3 of your posts have the word faggot/idiot/loser in it. Now contemplate why is it you take joy in going online and insulting people you don't agree with. Are you an unhappy person? If so, write down things you would like to change about your life that would make you a happy/productive individual. I wish you well!
/r/MensRights24/09/13 05:34 PM
5

You're a peach of a person!
/r/MensRights24/09/13 05:14 PM
3

Nice. I already bought a membership so I feel like I've done my part (especially since I'm in Calgary)
/r/MensRights20/09/13 08:11 PM
0

Bad content. Nothing to do with MRA.
/r/MensRights29/08/13 07:13 PM
4

Go to r/bad_cop_no_donut and it is the same thing. It is the general theme of the subreddit. Just because that subreddit has tonnes of terrible stories on cops that they are all bad. Similarly don't think just because this subreddit displays a lot of injustice towards men that this is always the way it happens. Take everything with a grain of salt and make informed/rational decisions.
/r/MensRights23/08/13 08:28 PM
2

I think you are taking a rather extreme view of things. After subbing to r/mensrights my GF and I sat down and went over the issues linked on the sidebar and had a great conversation. We had a big discussion on consent and things like that. It opened her eyes to a lot of things and sparked some interesting conversations and might have shifted both of our views a little. I don't think this subreddit's purpose is to scare you away from ever having a healthy/happy relationship but to bring up issue…
/r/MensRights23/08/13 06:53 PM
3

"but that isn't all of us." I feel the same way about this subreddit. I don't like the anti-feminism stuff unless it fits a narrative that is useful for mensrights. I'm not anti-feminism in any way whatsoever and I feel there are a lot of us here. I just find this subreddit useful to making me look at things from multiple sides.
/r/MensRights13/08/13 05:33 PM
1

Yeah the arguement I'm having right now is framed from the family perspective but it could go either way.
/r/MensRights09/07/13 09:35 PM
3

Lol she has one tweet from July that says "testing". Don't think she is an avid user but thanks anyways.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 08:09 PM
3

I tried to find an email address for her already to thank her but had no success.
/r/MensRights07/06/13 06:58 PM
4

I think sometimes the examples of what is happening on campus is actually represented on Reddit as well. Instead of working on what you think is right (advocacy) people are instead working on pointing out what the other side is doing wrong. (talking about extremism)
/r/MensRights07/06/13 04:23 PM
3

This is bad and you should feel bad!
/r/MensRights05/06/13 06:42 PM
8

No idea why you are getting downvoted ClaudeKenni. You are saying the same thing I came to say. This has nothing to do with Men's rights. They took both Mother's and Father's day away and replaced it with one day called family day.
/r/MensRights24/05/13 07:42 PM
2

Wow great writeup.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 08:09 PM
-1

I still feel that her telling the "hitman" that he didn't beat her is concerning but not proof she wasn't abused. You never know what a person hiring a hitman feels like talking about so maybe she decided not to divulge that information. But on that video alone they should have started to at least question the alleged DV and brought in the husband to talk about it.
/r/MensRights10/05/13 07:09 PM
2

No conceding needed. We both don't know for sure. Just from the timeline of his tweets I thought EternalArchon was attributing it to the wrong "stirring of the pot" joke he has made recently.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 09:14 PM
9

Believe me I'm a big podcast fan and have been listening to his talks about Fallon Fox and "Dongle-gate". I'm just saying I think this twitter post isn't because of those two things but the two tweets last night (p.s. I get his twitter as well). http://i.imgur.com/ShVNtCr.png
/r/MensRights05/04/13 09:09 PM
4

Sometimes I hate how reactionary this subreddit can be (downvotes). I totally agree with you GlassCoins. He has been a little overly offensive lately. (This coming from a fan of his comedy and podcast) Although I allow it in the fact that he is a comedian and comedy is edgy. But you have to expect some backlash when you say male-feminists should die and women who don't want kids are like dogs who eat their own shit.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 09:04 PM
11

I was saying he was wrong in attributing all the attacks on Twitter to the Fallon Fox statement. Saying I believe it had to do with his male-feminist joke.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 08:48 PM
41

I think you are wrong why he put this one up. He did get some flak for the whole transexual MMA fighter but he tweeted last night that "He hopes male-feminists die choking on a vegan pizza while listening to a lady gaga single" or something to that effect.
/r/MensRights05/04/13 08:41 PM
1

I think he has some valid points. Part of the feminists movement success was getting rid of the "gender-roles" that women were supposed to adhere to. Mensrights should be promoting the same thing for men. Why is it unacceptable for men to be less than masculine? Why can't this dude wear makeup if he wants? Why is it women hate men who are emotional? This video makes you question these things and therefore has something to say.
/r/MensRights04/03/13 05:25 PM
1

I make this mistake often when discussing stuff like this with my girlfriend. I am arguing from the court's perspective and you are taking a personal perspective. I agree wholeheartedly with you from a personal stance but I still maintain that this only casts suspicion from a legal perspective.
/r/MensRights09/02/13 07:41 PM
1

Think of it from a court's perspective. Would her admitting to a hired-gun in a shady car that she wasn't beaten throw out all her claims.......hell no! There is so many holes in that. Does that mean they shouldn't have called the husband to witness. Of course not. That's the one thing that could have turned this case around.....not some statement made whilst hiring a hitman. The fact that the husband wasn't called in to defend her claims of abuse is the true travesty of this case.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 10:54 PM
1

I'm not making any assumptions about reason for lying/not lying. All I'm saying is maybe she is sensitive about talking to a complete stranger about her spousal abuse. I seriously think this is a travesty of the court that she isn't in jail but I don't think this video "proves" she wasn't beaten. And whoever is downvoting a rational discussion doesn't get the redditquette.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 10:48 PM
1

I thought that she didn't successfully claim duress. I thought that the Nova Scotia court acquitted her on this basis but the supreme court over-turned that ruling but put a stay on proceedings. (which is the weird thing)
/r/MensRights08/02/13 02:47 PM
-1

I'm in no way defending her. The point I'm trying to get across is her saying "no" to the abuse question isn't a slam dunk. All it does is cast suspicion on her claims. The same claims the court decided to not challenge.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 02:45 PM
1

Well to be perfectly honest this isn't exactly a court setting so she isn't required to tell the "whole" truth. I think at the very least this video sheds some doubt on her claims but it can't be taken as direct contradiction. At the very least they should have called the husband to court to defend her claims.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 08:50 PM
7

I actually agree with you here. She wasn't under oath to say the whole truth. The problem here is this video should at least make people question the validity of her defense. This is a problem because her husband was never called to testify about this issue which was the conrnerstone of her duress defence.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 08:43 PM
36

I've been watching this case unfold and it seems really fishy what went on here. More light needs to be shed on this situation and I think instead of an internal RCMP investigation we need to investigate why the alleged abuse wasn't challenged considering that was her whole defense.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 06:20 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter