TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JDoorjam Archive

View 0 posts and 127 comments by JDoorjam on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

Because she didn't get in a car with an absolute stranger who wouldn't even say anything to them? No, I'd say she was playing the smart one in that scene.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 11:08 PM
1

Ok... then it's fake because the camera guy is always set up in the perfect spot to film their interaction. Or because the dialogue from the women is so forced and odd. Or simply because no one would get in a car with a stranger who wasn't even talking, regardless of how nice the car is.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 11:01 PM
8

Then rock out with your cock out except where prohibited by local ordinance.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 10:25 PM
-2

Yyyyeaaah.... this is obviously fake. You really think this guy is recognizable enough that, stopping on the street and not saying anything, someone would recognize him as "that guy from YouTube"?
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 09:19 PM
9

.... that he's a really good-looking guy with nice eyes and strong, symmetrical features? It's a photo. Nobody's suggesting they actually want to be with him, just like no one actually wanted to be with Ridiculously Photogenic Mugshot girl.
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 09:13 PM
5

Absolutely. If you aren't interested in having a legally partnered life, and especially if you're not interested in having children, it's probably only social conservatives who would say you should get married (as opposed to having unmarried sex with people, which I'm presuming you do now).
/r/TheRedPill19/06/14 09:06 PM
2

Eh, I'd doubt it's her fucking with you. Exes often un-friend each other because it's simply not pleasant to see them getting on with their lives with other people.
/r/askTRP15/06/14 02:51 PM
1

Great, that's a lot more info. I'd definitely like to hear more about these bands if you can share citations.
/r/TheRedPill15/06/14 12:32 AM
1

I invite you to disprove any of it. I've already provided the two relevant legal statutes. I've even pasted the relevant one, which says that having sexual connection without someone's consent and without believing on reasonable grounds that they've given consent is literally the same crime under the law as rape. So please explain what is "not correct as of right now" about any aspect of my comment above.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 10:32 PM
13

There is no crime called "rape" in New Zealand. It's called "sexual violation," and both men and women can commit it by having an unconsenting sex partner. It has the same sentence for men and women because under New Zealand law, it's the same crime. Now, the law does mention the word "rape," and under NZ law, it's true: it's only used for men. That merits changing. But it's a change of the scope of a single word we're talking about, because the crime and sentencing definitions are already gende…
/r/PussyPass14/06/14 10:25 PM
3

This is highly misleading -- it's exactly as accurate as saying "nobody can be convicted of rape in New Zealand," because there's no such crime. It's called "sexual violation." Women who have sexual connection with people who do not give consent are guilty of sexual violation, just like men. Rape is illegal, and the law does use the word rape in one spot, but it's the same part of the law as the violation for women, and in fact, the sentencing guidelines (up to 20 years) don't even use the word …
/r/PussyPass14/06/14 10:22 PM
1

I don't even know what that sentence means. Unlawful sexual connection is a possible prerequisite for the crime of sexual violation. The other possible prereq is rape. Unlawful sexual connection is when you have a sexual connection without consent. The sentence for sexual violation is up to 20 years in prison. There is no separate sentence for rape, because rape is a sexual violation. I really don't know how to explain it more clearly than this. You're wrong.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 10:17 PM
2

That, on the other hand, is an excellent reason to close your Facebook account. I thought you were saying you just un-friended her.
/r/askTRP14/06/14 10:01 PM
1

No, it doesn't. You're wrong again. Same law, section 128: Sexual violation is the act of a person who— (a)rapes another person; or (b)has unlawful sexual connection with another person. (2)Person A rapes person B if person A has sexual connection with person B, effected by the penetration of person B's genitalia by person A's penis,— (a)without person B's consent to the connection; and (b)without believing on reasonable grounds that person B consents to the connection. (3)Person A has unlawful …
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 09:57 PM
3

Just play it cool. Be relaxed. You overdid it deleting Facebook. If she confronts you, don't confront her back, just smile and say you've been busy. Sure, ask her out again, but again, don't "confront her on why not" if she declines. Who cares why not? It's not going to change the answer. There's no Court of Appeals. The very worst thing you can possibly do is be mad at her for not wanting to go out with you.
/r/askTRP14/06/14 09:53 PM
1

New Zealand's laws contradict you. Actually, it backs me up. Here is the actual law. It's the Crimes Act of 1961, Sub-section 128B, paragraph (1): "Every one who commits sexual violation is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 20 years."
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 09:40 PM
1

A big part of it is a rise in Internet porn convictions, which the UK is notoriously over-the-top intense about. Meanwhile, rape prosecutions and convictions are both up in the UK, while a recent study shows that false accusations of rape are exceedingly rare. So this is more actual rapists going to prison. What part of this is a "holocaust against men," again? EDIT: Seriously, instead of down-voting me, please explain why convicting actual rapists is akin to the systematic rounding-up and murde…
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 09:22 PM
4

Because otherwise they're prosecuting an innocent person and the system is hurting society.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 09:09 PM
6

What did your girlfriend's friend text you that made you respond that way?
/r/askTRP14/06/14 09:04 PM
3

You were evasive and way too sexual too soon. And yes, it's Tinder. Of course it's shallow. Tinder is a shallow platform.
/r/askTRP14/06/14 09:03 PM
1

Oh damn! That's quite a hurdle. ... Move closer? Dates with people already in your social circle lead to hooking up less quickly than, say, going to parties. Try hanging out with these women one on one after school casually, like happy hour drinks or something like that. Don't expect sex on the first date -- it's a possibility, but expecting it will change your approach whether you mean to or not, will make you less attractive, and may make you disappointed. If it goes well, then set up a second…
/r/askTRP14/06/14 08:39 PM
2

They're all tropey things that dads do: give their kids confidence, help them in a jam, and yeah, give them money. They play into classic gender norms, for sure. Whoever edited this video selected excerpts showing dads raising their sons to be big, confident men, and helped their daughters by rescuing them and giving them money. I'm not sure it's evidence of anything other than the fact that the gender norms TRP has mirror those of western society.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 08:30 PM
1

You sound like a very patient, conscientious partner. I'm not surprised that the assertiveness aspects of TRP get a positive response. It makes sense she would want to have a strong partner she can lean on: it sounds like she's carrying a lot around. I don't know if you've ever been really depressed, but if you haven't, it's really hard to explain just how absolutely debilitating it can be. Doing even very simple things can become tremendously difficult. I think going to a therapist is a very go…
/r/askTRP14/06/14 08:18 PM
2

You're on your way. Congrats: most people don't have the will to change themselves so dramatically. Now, some simple, easy-to-understand, hard-to-follow, good-advice-slash-slightly-bad-news: Don't over-think it, just learn the ropes and know you're going to screw up just like everybody else. If you find someone attractive and they're coming on to you, hook up with them. Maybe that'll be all that happens -- cool. Maybe they'll want to be in a relationship, and maybe that'll sound appealing. If it…
/r/askTRP14/06/14 08:09 PM
2

It's great that you've started getting fit. I highly recommend setting fitness goals for yourself, if you haven't already. Consider having a candid conversation with your wife about getting in shape together. A big part of that is diet -- work with her to reduce over-eating and unhealthy foods from your home. Talk about getting sexy for each other. Be supportive. Consider training for a half-marathon together. Make getting into shape a part of your relationship identity. Does your wife suffer at…
/r/askTRP14/06/14 07:51 PM
0

Is going out for "girl's night" not doing the same exact thing? No, because she's not doing it in order to make you feel insecure. She's doing it because she wants to have fun with her friends. Dread game, on the other hand, is explicitly and intentionally manipulative. Women regularly do this to men, both intentionally and unintentionally. But again, it's somehow it's a no-no when men flip the script. I would say that people of any gender should maximize their SMV. In fact, I think it's disresp…
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 06:47 PM
1

Ad hominem? No response to what was actually in my comment? To me it sounds like you've made up your mind that feminism and all feminists are all terrible villains, a priori. That's too bad. Any time you've reached a point that you reach an unshakable conclusion and then back-fill it with any evidence, like the error-ridden article you shared with me, you're doing yourself and those you engage with a disservice.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 04:51 PM
-1

The article directly contradicts you.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 04:47 PM
1

My point is that you can find somebody on the Internet saying just about anything. The craziest person claiming to be a feminist speaks for feminism to the same degree that the most virulent misogynist claiming to be part of the MRA movement speaks for them. What's the alternative to "let[ting] the insane ones exist"? Assassinating them? You can't stop people from tweeting, and you can't stop them from claiming they're on your side. So I'm asking for a respected feminist -- I'll let you define w…
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 04:47 PM
-2

Using "continual fear" won't ever be necessary, because once you inject a tiny bit of dread, it shouldn't really be an issue anymore. ... because she's continually afraid. Just because you're not continually acting doesn't mean the effect isn't ongoing. Not as damaging as having my girl cheat on me though But even more damaging is being in a relationship where you don't trust your partner. Why bother with the relationship, then? I've hooked up with multiple girls who were out on "girls night," o…
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 04:43 PM
1

You didn't answer my question. Who is being disrespected when a woman wants to go out dancing, and a man reacts by taking intentional steps to make her worry about her partner's fidelity? It sounds like, instead of addressing deep-seated insecurity about your partner's intentions, you are disrespecting your partner by using another unwitting person to be emotionally manipulative. That sounds like the recourse of an emotionally frail person.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 04:34 PM
0

Right... they go to clubs because they want to dance. You can't do that at a cafe. Calling me names doesn't change that. Is it really inconceivable to you that women like going out together and dancing?
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 04:26 PM
0

That sucks that you feel like you can't just go dance. Men and women should both be able to do that. It sounds like you get my point, though, that women -- and men, for that matter -- can absolutely just want to go dancing for the sake of going dancing.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 04:08 PM
2

[Women] could dance in places with men or alcohol, but no, they insist on only dancing in environments with those two factors. I don't know where you live that there are dry dance clubs, or ladies-only clubs, but nowhere that I've ever lived have I heard of either of these sorts of places. The only exception I know to that are lesbian clubs, and I have plenty of female friends who like going to lesbian bars precisely to avoid getting hit on by guys. But that exception aside, those just aren't a …
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 02:38 AM
13

You didn't mention that she can be found guilty of "sexual violation" instead, which has the same possible sentence as rape. I personally think they should call them the same thing instead of separating them by gender, but you're burying the lede not to mention that she's facing the same 20 years in prison. EDIT: For those curious: Here's the law which defines "sexual violation" to be "unlawful sexual connection with another person" (i.e., the perpetrator doesn't need a penis) and explains that …
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 01:42 AM
2

I've asked this of others, and I'll ask you too: what established, respected feminists have come out and said that yes, we should eliminate father's day?
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 01:36 AM
-2

Who is running with it? Where are the feminists with any credibility who have said, "yes, eliminate father's day!"? EDIT: Any answer from anybody? No? Just downvotes? Ah.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 01:34 AM
-4

At what point in this are women not respecting other people? They want to go dancing, and you want them to worry about whether or not you're going to cheat on them. Who's disrespecting whom here?
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 01:33 AM
-3

Can you link to established, respected feminists supporting this? That is, not just talking about it, but saying that eliminating father's day is a good idea?
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 01:32 AM
1

The comparable element is that they are both fun without training. One of the ways dancing is different than playing guitar is that it's more fun in a crowd, where you can feed off of social energy. Simply being around other people makes it a better experience, in the same way that being at a baseball game with the stands packed with people is more exciting than watching the same game with nobody around.
/r/TheRedPill14/06/14 01:31 AM
2

Ignoring the fact that plenty of women actually do that, why? People do stuff all the time that they're not tremendously good at but have fun doing. Plenty of people enjoy skiing but don't feel the need to take classes. Tons of people like screwing around on the guitar but don't feel the need to take lessons. Why should women take dance classes if they are getting pleasure out of dancing with no technical dance abilities?
/r/TheRedPill13/06/14 09:55 PM
-1

Let's see... being relentlessly hit on all the time, being orbited, people presuming you're going to be an entitled bitch, people presuming you don't have any problems or that everything comes easy to you, wondering whether your looks are the only reason someone is interested in you... that all seems to suck.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/14 09:48 PM
1

Eh. Women actually do like to go dancing for the sake of going dancing. And who the hell wears their best suit to a brothel?
/r/TheRedPill13/06/14 09:44 PM
-1

That reeks of transparent insecurity. "Oh, you're gonna do something that makes me nervous about you cheating on me? Well, I'm gonna make you anxious too -- what do you think about that?!" And using continual fear that you're going to cheat on your girlfriend as a tool to control her behavior can only have a damaging effect on your relationship.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/14 09:42 PM
1

But sex is easily available to women in a public bathroom, a phone booth, a reasonably thick bush in the park.... It's just not symmetrical at all. Meanwhile, nobody goes to a brothel to hang out. People -- and in particular women -- genuinely do go to clubs to dance and socialize.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/14 09:39 PM
-20

These "morons" are 4chan trolls. Feminists don't actually have anything to do with this. EDIT: My comment has been buried deeper than a nuclear bomb test, but despite a number of requests, not a single actual feminist with any weight or following in the feminist community has been pointed to who wants to cancel Father's Day.
/r/TheRedPill13/06/14 09:36 PM
-2

You mean Internet trolls? Agreed: nobody should have any shred of respect for trolls. Feminists didn't start this, and they're not engaging with it. EDIT: Plenty of downvotes, but can anyone please link me to an established feminist who backs the idea of eliminating Father's Day?
/r/TheRedPill13/06/14 09:35 PM
2

(Don't quote me on this) Sorry, I had to. I just don't see it as being that simple. The BP "branch" doesn't define itself as such -- it's simply a useful archetype for TRP to point to and say, "don't do those things." So, to ask in TRP what a blue-piller would do is almost literally synonymous with saying, "what would the most sexually incompetent, emotionally weak individual imaginable do?" In reality, things are fluid, move along gradients, and evolve. There are plenty of people who use method…
/r/askTRP13/06/14 09:22 PM
1

Your first question is totally loaded, obviously, so I'll decline to answer it. The link you then reference makes demonstrably false statements all over the place, like: "Parents today spend 50% less time with their children than they did 40 years ago," as though the radically changing modern economy wasn't responsible for this. Just about all parents -- yes, even "radical feminists -- would love to spend more time with their kids. "The American Psychological Association holds that fathers are n…
/r/TheRedPill13/06/14 09:11 PM
1

I don't think I can imagine a scenario in which I'd say any of those things to someone, no. I'd say 2-5 are clearly insults -- I notice in your example of how tone can change the context, you took #1, and then softened it to the point where it's not a neg (i.e., a show of disinterest) anymore. how can you tell who is positive and who is negative if the results are the same? By having a three-minute conversation. You can tell who is positive and who is negative in that amount of time. I'm pretty …
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 11:24 PM
1

BluePillers believe that being nice, courting a woman and being a emotional tampon is better than being straight forward and telling a girl that you like her then taking matters into your own hand to seduce the girl. How are you defining "blue-pillers"? If you are defining "blue-pillers" as "everyone who hasn't discovered "the red pill" yet, then that group is massive, and there's no way any one description could capture their "strategy" or beliefs. Or would you define it more narrowly than that…
/r/askTRP11/06/14 11:18 PM
1

You have to be very, very careful. Pregnancy is a real risk whenever you have sex with a woman. I'm confused by your post: do you use a condom that I brought with me or do you cum on the girl [and] wipe her off ? Because you can't be doing both.
/r/askTRP11/06/14 10:01 PM
1

This is like turning a koala and raccoon loose in a eucalyptus tree to see who can eat the most leaves. It's gonna be the koala, and maybe in part it's because he's better at it, but mostly it's because the raccoon couldn't give less of a shit. There is no "blue pill philosophy" about picking up women at the mall, because that simply isn't something that blue-pillers care about the way many red pillers do. But if it's fun for you to watch one man hitting on women while another man reads a newspa…
/r/askTRP11/06/14 09:15 PM
1

Yeah, he says that "you can't win an argument," and he's talking about quibbling over irrelevant facts. It's not about conceding opinions, it's about avoiding trying to "win" against someone who you want to like and respect you.
/r/askTRP11/06/14 08:45 PM
2

It's a calculated display of disinterest which, yes, absolutely can include insults. This article over at Seduction Science pretty well explains what I mean when I say "negging."
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 08:34 PM
2

If you're just using that term to mean "women I've had sex with," about 30. If you're counting women I've hooked up with without having sex with... more. 50? I don't know. Of those, a half-dozen or so ended up being relationships (using terms like "boyfriend/girlfriend," saying "I love you, etc.), and all of those were hook-ups that grew into relationships, so take those out or don't, depending on how you're counting. I had never heard of the PUA community but was doing a lot of the things they …
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 08:06 PM
9

Right -- so it's the men who are making less who cheat, rather than the women who are making more. A man that makes that much less than a woman very likely has other redeeming qualities, where income becomes negligible. With that in mind, he is likely unphased by the fact that his wife makes more money. They would be the male-equivalent of a golddigger. This seems like a leap. Golddiggers would certainly be a subset, but just as easily the wife's career could have progressed substantially while …
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 07:45 PM
1

By interesting (and totally subjective) coincidence, at #53 of 241, the UK is the first country on the list of countries sorted by population density that I'd want to live in (even if I spoke the language).
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 07:25 PM
3

That's not feminism. That's sounds like plain old laziness.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 07:20 PM
-1

Not having a plan of action is a strategy. A shitty one, but a strategy nonetheless. No, it's really not, especially as I said explicit strategy. That's like saying not having a map is a map. This is the go-to BluePill mantra. RP only works on weak, insecure women. Didn't say that. Surely no confident woman would ever fall for it. Didn't say that either. I said it works best on insecure women, which I stand by. And, incidentally, I'm a fan and proponent of showing social status and confidence. T…
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 06:57 PM
1

Orbiting isn't a "BP... dominant strategy," because there is no such thing as a BP strategy. By definition, BP is just everybody who isn't over in TRP. That's a big-ass universe of people. And orbiters don't have an explicit strategy anyway, because if they actually thought about what they were doing, they'd realize they were being idiots. I (obviously) am not a fan of orbiting or orbiters. And, I think that negging/dread game/etc., which are explicitly predicated on causing concern and self-dou…
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 06:35 PM
5

You can be anti-PUA and anti-orbiter. It's not like those are the only two options in life, and they've both got their opponents. Incidentally, what's nonsense about talking to women like they're human beings?
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 06:22 PM
27

Er, it appears that the consensus is that a man is more likely to cheat if a woman makes more money than he does. A cursory search didn't turn up any data showing the correlation you describe.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 06:10 PM
3

Errr...? It's a comic called "Friends with Detriments" where the guy says that the wistfulness in [the woman's] gaze and the tiny pause before [she says] "I love you will hint that this wasn't the ending [she] hoped for and the punchline is that the guy who obviously doesn't care about this woman's feelings ironically says, "but he doesn't respect you!" He's pretty obviously bashing orbiters.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 05:53 PM
1

Yes, I know that that's TRP's answer. But simply reasserting that doesn't make it true. Dancing around to a live Sir Mix-A-Lot performance sounds like it could be pretty awesome, whether or not anyone's paying attention.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 05:50 PM
43

:: shrug :: Again, not a problem, though if either one of us was making enough money that they could be the sole breadwinner, that would be awesome. I wouldn't want to stop working, but it'd be great to have that much income coming in. My ego's just not all that tied up in outperforming my SO at anything. It's a partnership, not a competition, and I'm confident enough in what I bring to my relationships that I don't lose sleep over who's bringing home more dough. A relationship built on who "con…
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 05:28 PM
30

From what I've seen, it's typically when a guy makes it an issue that it becomes one. I've dated women who make more than me. It's never been an issue, because it never made me insecure.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 05:05 PM
7

XKCD did this pretty well, too.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 05:02 PM
8

Not really sure what the big deal is. First of all, whatever this video says, it only says about the women who got on stage. There are, presumably, plenty who didn't get on stage, too. It's textbook selection bias to say this proves anything about "every woman." What I see in this video is a stage full of women who were invited to get up on stage and dance, thought it would be fun, and did it. What part of that is "whoring"? EDIT: For those of you downvoting without responding, seriously, I'd li…
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 03:45 PM
1

Edit: As a side note, it is somewhat ironic that we are arguing about racism/cultural differences in a forum where we spend a majority of our time talking about how an entire gender displays specific traits because of the culture in which they were raised... :) Most would call it sexism, we call it truth. Yeah... that's definitely something worth thinking about.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 01:41 PM
-3

Seriously dude, look up racism. You said that, because she's black, she reacted a certain way based on her black experience. You said that even though you know nothing at all about her except that she's black. When you make assumptions about the way someone thinks, feels, or acts based on the color of their skin, you're being racist. It's cringe-inducing that you don't agree with that. I don't really feel like going back and forth on this anymore, so if you'd like another swing at saying that it…
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 01:39 PM
1

So, all kinds of errors here, I'm afraid. What it actually says is "1 in 5 women will be raped or psychologically abused," No, it says raped. FTA: "The researchers defined rape as completed forced penetration, forced penetration facilitated by drugs or alcohol, or attempted forced penetration." if you only count rape as involving physical penetration or an attempt at physical penetration, that number falls to 1%. In the previous year. 20% is a lifetime prevalence. 1% is a previous year number. W…
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 01:15 PM
0

Actually, "assuming that she fits the profile of other black people" is practically the definition of racist.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 01:10 PM
-2

You made assumptions about the life experiences of an individual based on the color of her skin. That's racism. You can look up all the sources you want that say being black in America is hard -- and it certainly is. But when you say, "she did X because she's black," heads up: you're being racist.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 01:09 PM
5

Or, not even wait around for divine intervention and just stop being a bitch?
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 03:09 AM
1

Yeah, I'm not really making an argument here. Just thought it was interesting to get even more data.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 03:07 AM
0

Don't you think it's kinda racist to presume that, "being black, she's probably seen some shit go down in her life and she has developed those skills too"? You have no idea what her life story is. EDIT -- from her bio: "I am thrilled to be here at News10! It's truly a blessing to have the opportunity to cover the news in my home state," Arnold said. Keba graduated with honors from The University of Georgia. She grew up in Southern California with her parents and older brother, but also lived in …
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 03:00 AM
0

Where are feminists saying that rapes are increasing? EDIT: To be clear, it's trivially easy to find people on the Internet saying that. I'm asking, where is it a tenet of feminism that rapes are on the rise? What established, listened-to feminist individuals or organizations say that?
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 02:52 AM
1

They said that 0.2% of women reported being a victim of sexual assault that year, whereas other figures -- for instance, this survey-based study by the CDC -- looks at lifetime prevalence, and also will count those women who were afraid to go to the police, or didn't go for some other reason. EDIT: People downvoting me, please read my elaboration further down the thread.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 02:51 AM
1

In broader context, it looks like reported rapes rose steadily from 1960 until 1993, at which point they then started to steadily decline.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 02:48 AM
2

That they know what they're doing doesn't mean that their data source is flawless. It's just a really tough area to get good data in, and be certain your data is accurate. But still, something happened to reduce, at the very least, the reporting of these rapes.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 02:43 AM
1

She specifically identified herself as a "third wave feminist"? Yeah, that's just plain not part of that particular sub-type of feminism. Odd.
/r/TheRedPill11/06/14 02:40 AM
1

Yeah, feminists are generally as engaged or lazy or obsessively fit or morbidly obese as everybody else. And, believe it or not, there are ardent feminists who put in the work to stay hot -- I've dated a few.
/r/TheRedPill10/06/14 03:06 AM
2

I totally asked the wrong question, because a quick google of "love me when I'm fat" turned up thousands and thousands of pages of people, mostly women, complaining that they'd gained "only" 30-50 pounds and their husbands weren't attracted to them anymore. I guess what I had meant was, is that a feminist thing, or is that just a people-too-lazy-to-stay-hot-for-their-SO thing?
/r/TheRedPill10/06/14 01:04 AM
-6

Can you show me one of these feminists people keep talking about who say, "you have to love me no matter how fat and lazy I get"?
/r/TheRedPill10/06/14 12:18 AM
1

Oh -- see, yeah, that completely changes it.
/r/TheRedPill09/06/14 11:49 PM
1

I can't watch the video where I am -- what did she say to cut in line?
/r/TheRedPill09/06/14 10:33 PM
1

Yyyyeahhh...... I've definitely both cut in the airport line, and been fine with people cutting, because we were late for our flights. The better way to do it is to apologetically ask an actual TSA agent, rather than trying to find an accomplice in line.
/r/TheRedPill09/06/14 10:32 PM
0

Come to think of it, you make that sound like a pretty smart choice!
/r/TheRedPill09/06/14 12:50 AM
5

Does this control for the availability of contraception, particularly female-specific forms of contraception? I'd imagine that the developed world has both more women in the workplace and broader availability of the pill, IUDs, depo provera, etc. I'd also be interested in seeing statistics on just how many more kids stay-at-home moms are having versus their career-pursuing counterparts within, rather than across, countries, especially controlling for income level and access to health care (and, …
/r/TheRedPill08/06/14 08:54 PM
1

FTA: Researchers put 96 male and 103 female undergraduate students through an exercise where participants spent three minutes talking to each of five members of the opposite sex. Before the exercise started they were asked to rate their own attractiveness, and after each chat with a potential partner, they ranked that person's appearance and how sexually interested they believed the person was in them. The experiment showed that men who mistakenly believed they were attractive were more likely t…
/r/TheRedPill08/06/14 08:50 PM
1

I think an even better analogy is, you're not bluffing if you think having all red cards is a flush. Even if you lose some hands you'll attribute it to bad luck, not to your holding a mix of hearts and diamonds.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/14 11:27 AM
1

Because they question is, "do these women think I'm hot?" and not, "am I hot?" The guys said, "yes, these women find me attractive." They're wrong: the women said no.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/14 11:26 AM
0

Ok... but that's not related to the question I was answering, which was: who bluffs more, men or women? I'm arguing that because men have more confidence, they're bluffing less (because they really do believe in themselves, whether or not they're accurate).
/r/TheRedPill08/06/14 11:22 AM
1

Is it really bluffing if it's practically guaranteed to be effective? Again, I'm arguing that men are not bluffing, because they generally have higher confidence. I've never heard of a man "getting caught" in a way that costs him. Shit tests do this all the time.
/r/TheRedPill08/06/14 11:21 AM
0

:: shrug :: she's your imaginary archetype. You know better how she feels than I do. But the charts simply say who is attractive, which I'm guessing means physical. So even acknowledging that 20-year-old women are the hottest, your hypothetical 34-year-old has a point that there's more to relationships than physical attraction. It'd drive me nuts to date a 20-year-old no matter how hot she is.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/14 07:53 PM
2

OKCupid stats typically aren't done with poll questions, they're done with data analysis, either by seeing who messages whom, or asking members to pick who's hottest from a bunch of paired photos. They then derive their results from that data.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/14 07:13 PM
3

I think it's the fact that 20-year-old women are hotter that's adding to their perceived attractiveness, availability or no.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/14 07:10 PM
3

Er, any 34-year-old woman is well aware she was hotter at 20, single ones even painfully more so.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/14 07:09 PM
-1

Ok... but that doesn't have to do with whether men bluff less than women. Again, if men are over-confident, then they aren't bluffing. Your post feels like a counter-argument, but doesn't disagree with that theory.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/14 06:48 PM
1

I'd tweak that slightly to say, if you have unkind friends, find new ones. But kindness shouldn't come with an expectation of reciprocity.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/14 06:45 PM
2

Eh. True kindness is appreciated by both genders, if you define kindness as "generosity without obligation or expected reciprocation." Women don't like it when guys do things because they're supposed to, or when they're just trying to get laid. These are the betas and "nice guys" that women and TRPers alike complain about.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/14 06:41 PM
2

Re-read the article. The study found that men think they are more attractive than they really are, and overestimate female interest. So, again, you're not bluffing when you think you're holding a winning hand, even if you're wrong.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/14 06:34 PM
11

This is way abnormal for western culture, too. That woman is bat-shit crazy.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/14 05:54 PM
-6

That may simply be because men overestimate themselves when it comes to their own physical attractiveness, so they're not bluffing -- they're just wrong.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/14 05:20 PM
1

Feminists believe in personal agency and responsibility. They also believe that the playing field is not level, and that there are certain, specific biases baked in that prevent women from succeeding in ways they ultimately would. They think women who work as hard as men should have as much of a chance to succeed as men do. Now, you can disagree with whether the system is unfair for women -- it's pretty clear you do -- and whether systemic solutions are the answer to that. But the core of femini…
/r/TheRedPill07/06/14 05:13 PM
6

You want to stay away from conversational ruts, where people can talk and not even listen to what they are saying. That was part off the reason that when I was in DC, I'd play a game to see how long I could go in a conversation before either of us asked what the other person did for a living. In general, just take a genuine interest in them as people. I will often ask them what they like about their neighborhood -- everyone has some degree of emotional investment, and they typically don't have a…
/r/TheRedPill06/06/14 10:28 PM
5

Yyyeah, which is apparently what happened. There's no indication that the defendant continued blowing the guy after that.
/r/TheRedPill06/06/14 08:03 PM
3

Yep, I think it's good advice for everybody not to date hypocrites. Everyone I've been in a relationship with has known, because I told them, that they're hotter when they're in shape. And they all let me know they felt the same way about me. People should get in shape for their own well-being, but it's a good bit of inspiration on the side to know your SO will think you're hotter (and, more broadly, take care of yourself).
/r/TheRedPill06/06/14 04:18 PM
6

The purpose of this post is not to defend feminism, but to show how intellectually dishonest it is. Your last line threw me off, as your whole post is about ways feminism agrees with TRP. And there are more ways, too, including about taking responsibility for and control of one's life, building an emotional foundation of self-love, and not letting one's self get walked on by anyone, but especially people who don't have your best interests in mind. That all resonates with feministy values, and th…
/r/TheRedPill06/06/14 04:12 PM
1

I always wonder why a lot of subs disagree with us It's typically TRPers declaring that other subs disagree, rather than actual people in those subs. In reality, there's plenty of core red-pill stuff, like taking responsibility for your life, respecting and improving yourself, and hitting the gym to become more physically attractive, that even ardent feminists would agree are worthy pursuits. Now, they don't sit around talking about those things, for the same reason, say, r/bicycling doesn't -- …
/r/TheRedPill06/06/14 03:07 PM
7

I just woke up and incase we have someone from TwoXChromosomes lurking, .this [1] is for you. I'm pretty sure most TwoXers would agree with you. Almost no woman* wants a lazy, flabby boyfriend, especially if he was in shape when they started dating. If a guy doesn't think he's worth enough to invest in himself, what does that say to the woman about the quality of the man she's with? I'll bet your co-workers' girlfriends would LOVE it if they got off their asses and went to the gym with you. *Ok,…
/r/TheRedPill06/06/14 02:28 PM
2

I'm a feminist. I think that picture is highly offensive for all the reasons people here are saying. And if that came up on my social media streams, I'd say so.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 02:27 AM
7

Misanthropy, really. The guy was a fundamentally broken individual, plain and simple.
/r/TheRedPill02/06/14 03:26 PM
2

Have you tried posting that over at TwoX? I'd be very curious what their response would be. Or, if you'd be OK with it, I'd like to post it, either with or without a link to your username, and ask people there to respond.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 11:27 PM
1

I take it, then, that you reject that transsexualism is a thing?
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 11:23 PM
2

Validation? Nah, I'm set on that front, thanks. I'm just here for the interesting conversations.
/r/TheRedPill01/06/14 11:22 PM
7

Feminist here, again. I saw the headline and was hoping to contextualize what might be an out-of-context paraphrasing. But, nope, everything she said sounds pretty out there to me. I'm a big fan of my gender identity, for starters. I think females can be women and males can be men and we can still all get along just fine.
/r/TheRedPill31/05/14 11:52 PM
1

I appreciate you saying that. Those are all great questions. They remind me of another observation about TRP, which hopefully will help frame my answers to those questions you've posed. The Red Pill is doggedly fixated on the concepts of reinternalizing the locus of control, and activating personal agency -- that is, that people should realize that (1) they are not controlled by outside forces, but in fact can exert control over them, and (2) following on that, they should take active steps to i…
/r/TheRedPill30/05/14 04:59 PM
2

Ah -- so you'd rather have a woman feel something intense for you, good or bad, because it's easier to maintain intensity and change polarity than vice versa? Interesting.
/r/TheRedPill30/05/14 02:26 PM
1

For sure, but then, I don't really know what the debate would be about. When you drill down to actual issues, I imagine most feminists will say that TRP is misogynistic and leans on taking advantage of people's insecurities, and red pillers will say "sexual strategy is amoral," even if it hurts people (my editorial comment, obviously, but not untrue, I think). Red pillers say that all long- and short-term sexual relationships should be avoided, and no emotional commitment should be made and anyo…
/r/TheRedPill30/05/14 01:12 AM
3

I do appreciate being able to speak here. I actually do it very regularly, though with my alt account. My net karma from red pill subs is actually really high -- I'm simply selective about where I weigh in with my (always honest) opinion. I'd certainly like to think of myself as a good person! Do I refrain from activism? Errrhhhmmm, the short answer is yes, although there have certainly been feminist political movements and causes I've supported, particularly international ones of late. Where I …
/r/TheRedPill30/05/14 01:03 AM
1

I think you may be confused on this point. You can be a feminist and a stay-at-home parent at the same time. I'm not talking hypothetically -- I know a few. Modern feminism is pretty cool with women doing whatever they want, including staying home. Obviously, it's not a big, homogeneous movement, so there will be those who think women should definitely be in the working world, but plenty of feminists also think staying at home and raising a family is a totally fine choice -- provided the person …
/r/TheRedPill29/05/14 11:14 PM
0

Wait, any woman? Why?
/r/TheRedPill29/05/14 11:11 PM
1

a girl is only with you for what you can do for her That's fundamentally true of most or even all relationships between people, isn't it? Even parents take care of their kids for the positive emotional response they get from it.
/r/TheRedPill29/05/14 11:10 PM
0

Eh, yes and no. I'm a feminist, and I don't think cherry-picking comments or using emotion-based argument makes for good debate. I think, for the most part, feminists disagree with TRP because there seems to be an overall sentiment that all women are inferior, unfaithful, and have the maturity level at best of teenagers. I mean, just skimming the titles on the sidebar makes it pretty clear that, at the very least, the mods of this site have a pretty low opinion of women. And, of course, there's …
/r/TheRedPill29/05/14 11:08 PM
4

Hey there! Feminist here. Yup, there are a ton of issues where men are getting unfairly discriminated against. Actually, we do care about those issues. Of particular personal concern is that our boys and young men (here I'm talking about the US, where I live) in particular are falling behind in school, and youth mental health and gang violence issues among males are continuing apace. We need to take these issues on, and focusing through a gender lens, as you suggest, could indeed be of some help…
/r/TheRedPill29/05/14 11:03 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter