TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JayBopara Archive

View 58 posts and 1,305 comments by JayBopara on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
1851

Social IssuesJayBopara/r/MensRights01/10/16 02:51 PM
581

JayBopara/r/MensRights05/01/14 05:05 AM
172

Reverse GendersJayBopara/r/MensRights20/12/14 04:53 AM
160

DiscriminationJayBopara/r/MensRights23/07/15 06:20 AM
115

DiscriminationJayBopara/r/MensRights10/04/15 11:30 AM
101

FeminismJayBopara/r/MensRights02/11/15 04:00 PM
90

JayBopara/r/MensRights24/08/14 02:07 AM
82

JayBopara/r/MensRights18/02/14 03:52 PM
78

JayBopara/r/MensRights20/01/16 09:03 AM
76

JayBopara/r/MensRights12/01/14 04:39 PM
65

Social IssuesJayBopara/r/MensRights06/01/16 03:33 PM
62

NewsJayBopara/r/MensRights18/06/14 10:20 AM
60

JayBopara/r/MensRights15/11/13 03:46 PM
54

DiscriminationJayBopara/r/MensRights26/11/14 06:18 AM
51

JayBopara/r/MensRights26/09/13 05:12 AM
47

JayBopara/r/MensRights11/02/14 10:00 AM
45

NewsJayBopara/r/MensRights21/01/15 08:00 AM
43

JayBopara/r/MensRights19/11/13 04:47 PM
32

DiscriminationJayBopara/r/MensRights28/03/15 04:25 AM
32

JayBopara/r/MensRights23/11/13 09:31 AM
32

JayBopara/r/MensRights28/03/14 05:36 AM
29

NewsJayBopara/r/MensRights14/01/15 01:50 AM
26

JayBopara/r/MensRights29/09/13 06:24 AM
26

Anti-MRMJayBopara/r/MensRights01/08/15 08:37 AM
25

Edu./Occu.JayBopara/r/MensRights30/07/15 06:18 AM
25

JayBopara/r/MensRights26/09/13 06:35 AM
24

Legal RightsJayBopara/r/MensRights09/07/15 02:30 AM
24

JayBopara/r/MensRights17/08/13 01:56 PM
24

JayBopara/r/MensRights12/11/13 05:22 AM
24

GeneralJayBopara/r/MensRights03/03/19 03:30 PM
20

DiscriminationJayBopara/r/MensRights28/04/15 11:40 PM
20

GeneralJayBopara/r/MensRights17/08/15 03:33 AM
20

JayBopara/r/MensRights29/10/13 09:28 AM
19

JayBopara/r/MensRights03/07/14 07:24 AM
14

Edu./Occu.JayBopara/r/MensRights30/08/15 01:16 PM
10

JayBopara/r/MensRights17/04/15 06:09 AM
10

DiscriminationJayBopara/r/MensRights23/08/15 09:33 AM
9

NewsJayBopara/r/MensRights03/09/14 09:00 AM
7

JayBopara/r/MensRights20/09/13 09:49 AM
7

JayBopara/r/MensRights10/02/14 11:06 AM
7

WBBJayBopara/r/MensRights27/10/14 12:51 PM
6

Reverse GendersJayBopara/r/MensRights30/09/14 01:28 PM
5

IntactivismJayBopara/r/MensRights02/09/16 01:40 AM
5

JayBopara/r/MensRights14/10/13 04:44 AM
4

DiscriminationJayBopara/r/MensRights23/01/15 07:35 AM
4

OutrageJayBopara/r/MensRights22/05/14 05:29 PM
3

Anti-MRAJayBopara/r/MensRights24/10/14 04:38 AM
3

JayBopara/r/MensRights28/01/14 02:27 AM
2

JayBopara/r/MensRights30/07/15 06:14 AM
1

re: FeminismJayBopara/r/MensRights15/06/14 05:05 AM
1

OutrageJayBopara/r/MensRights03/02/15 01:14 AM
1

Blogs/VideoJayBopara/r/MensRights08/11/14 11:01 AM
1

Eastern CultureJayBopara/r/MensRights19/11/14 03:33 AM
0

JayBopara/r/MensRights30/09/13 09:31 AM
0

JayBopara/r/MensRights30/09/13 08:21 AM
0

JayBopara/r/MensRights17/09/13 11:35 AM
0

JayBopara/r/MensRights14/06/14 05:08 AM
0

JayBopara/r/MensRights17/11/13 11:59 AM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 1,305 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

Disagree. It's clearly implying that women are better at arguing points than men.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 05:34 AM
6

I guess the point is, if you argue with a woman, there are a couple of extra things to keep in mind. Namely that society doesn't look well on men who argue with women (good in the court room - though it didn't help Harvey), and that women are often so illogical you cannot win the argument, they just end up getting emotional with you.
/r/MensRights03/04/20 05:33 AM
2

So it becomes a self-perpetuating cycle is what you are saying. If we continually see movies where, say for example, Jewish people are made out to be only interested in money, selfish except to the Jewish community, and are made out to be nasty selfish people - which is the way they were perceived for centuries - then it is very difficult to break that hateful cycle. I think it's a little more complex. Hollywood has a way of altering public perception. For instance putting people such as African…
/r/MensRights03/03/19 03:39 PM
3

The core of this problem is feminism. That's right - the ideology and religion which claims it is about equality is actually for extreme hatred and bigotry. It's better to call feminism what it really is. Feminazism.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 07:34 AM
3

I'm surprised that Camille wrote this!
/r/MensRights21/02/19 03:17 AM
1

I'm going to chime in and say that there are probably two fundamental trains of feminism. One is liberal feminism which is basically arguing that men & women can do what they want and not be confined to gender roles - that women can be strippers and such and not be shamed. Most of the people here support this viewpoint. The other is radical feminism - and this is tragically the dominant feminist ideology in academia and positions of authority. This is the most incredibly misandric ideology to th…
/r/MensRights25/07/18 04:42 AM
8

Yes absolutely right. It's pointing out facts that these feminazi are most worried about. Because it proves what all of us informed people know - that feminism is based on lies.
/r/MensRights25/07/18 04:28 AM
2

+5. I like it. Feminism is 30% Misandry, 30% Ignorance and 40% Ingroup and self serving bias. That's feminism in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 08:37 AM
2

Notice how the people opposed to Jordan Petersen's views in the article are people who are professionally pushing for all the things Jordan is critical of.
/r/MensRights14/03/18 08:34 AM
4

Utterly disgraceful.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 05:22 PM
1

That's waht feminists and manginas want. I'll stick with the natural organs thanks, and she can stick with hers.
/r/MensRights26/02/18 01:52 AM
3

feminist logic is an oxymoron more like feminist bullshit One thing you can be almost guaranteed when a feminist speaks - 90% of what he/she says is bullshit.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 06:12 AM
12

Okay. Sounds good to me, now I can go to jail and select an 18 year old attractive female to be my cellmate. Sounds good.
/r/MensRights21/02/18 06:07 AM
-6

You had to point out to that idiot reporter he was wrong. You should have pressed that he was wrong and that if he can produce evidence to the contrary that you will stand corrected. Reporter was probably just a biased feminist and homosexual loving crowd following dimwit that just wanted to prove he was write in the heat of the moment.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 07:40 AM
1

I am using the common but incorrect usage that the MSM perpetuates. Stop projecting - it is you who is basing your views on a faith system. Please do your homework. Thanks.
/r/MensRights15/02/18 07:32 AM
3

This is why pedophilia is an abnormality rather than a sexual orientation- A chronophilic disorder. The same was said of homosexuality up until recently, that it was a disorder, an abnormality, an abomination. Recently one of the US winter homosexual olympians wanted to have nothing to do with Vice President Pence because Pence apparently supported therapy to help homosexuals not have homosexual feelings. The question really is - if homosexuality, is so cherished and loved in our 'modern' societ…
/r/MensRights12/02/18 10:04 AM
5

I agree. It is a one-sided forced upon contract benefiting the partner who has less financial and job security at the disadvantage of the partner which has more financial and job security. Unfortunately when we add the gender bias against men in the way these contracts are enforced it really does appear to be a violation of human rights.
/r/MensRights12/02/18 05:04 AM
2

Your views just perpetuate the modern pedohysteria climate. Very difficult for men to do father-daughter dances, give affection to their children, or be kindergarten or primary school teachers without many people jumping on the pedohysteria bandwagon.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 07:24 AM
7

subconscious stigma against women and minorities. The subconscious stigma we have against men in our modern society is far, far, far greater than the stigma against women. When it comes to minorities then yes, you may have a point - but I think that stigma is more conscious than subconscious. However, there may also be some subconsciousness at work from illogical people.
/r/MensRights05/02/18 06:32 AM
5

The clueless git who made the comment that rape is worse has now deleted his comment after being shown up to be a completely illogical bird brained idiot. Completely illogical bird brained idiot = 95.7% of all feminists.
/r/MensRights01/02/18 03:18 AM
1

Problem is, women seldom select to marry men who make less money than them. The need for the MHRM to counteract traditional conservatives and feminists is more than ever.
/r/MensRights30/01/18 05:53 AM
38

Makes zero sense. You should not be entitled to the same standard of living after a divorce. Therefore there is no incentive to stay married if another person comes along or a typical argument happens.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 06:12 AM
11

Explain in detail thanks.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 06:10 AM
3

Sounds more like gynocentrism to me again.
/r/MensRights26/01/18 01:09 AM
2

You can bet the authoritarian feminists will not want women to be allowed to go topless. We know how they feel when they see women topless on tv - they hate it. And complain, complain. It's not a universal right because it does not have the support of authoritarian feminists. These disgusting people will allow it as long as it is an unattractive woman doing it. Attractive women being topless - no way for the feminazi!
/r/MensRights22/01/18 05:56 AM
1

Yes I know. What is going on with our subreddit? Being invaded by feminists? Seriously people - downvote if you desire but also explain why you are downvoting. If we get a response saying "if you don't know why you are being downvoted then I cannot help you" - then it is true we have been taken over by feminists. Where reason, logic and facts get trumped by feeeeelllzzzz.
/r/MensRights21/01/18 07:06 AM
1

I would personally be more comfortable with an even higher standard of proof than beyond reasonable doubt considering our advances in technology to assist with crime detection these days.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 05:07 AM
1

"The type of thing you are advocating for is exactly what corrupt courts" I was simply advocating for "beyond reasonable doubt" and pointing out that most jurors do not adhere to it, and just go with the balance of probabilities.
/r/MensRights12/01/18 04:48 AM
6

James Damore has shown the proof as to how deep this discrimination against men goes.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 07:13 AM
11

You need to view each case on its own and not bring any of the biases into the court. Sure - you knew there had to be a high burden of evidence and proof - but recorded in HiDef is a little too much. Without seeing the case and the evidence presented I cannot say whether you were right or wrong to decide the way you did. However, it does appear your burden of proof was greater than "beyond reasonable doubt" and that was too much. Unfortunately, most jurors seem to go with "probably did it" which…
/r/MensRights11/01/18 06:58 AM
0

When we live in a society where it is considered okay for a male to desire a 50 year old hag, yet it is considered perverse and weird for a man to desire a 17 year old female near the height of her fertility and reproductive capabilities we know something is fucked up!
/r/MensRights11/01/18 06:48 AM
1

Let's not forget about one of the key things - demonization of male heterosexuality. This is one thing we fight not only authoritarian feminists, but also religious conservatives against.
/r/MensRights11/01/18 06:45 AM
5

Good work!
/r/MensRights04/01/18 03:01 PM
5

+10 Great thought experiment Mr_Mranarchist
/r/MensRights07/12/17 01:56 AM
1

Me. I hate ribbons. I hate all visual displays of "support" for causes. All it does is give people a false sense of contribution. Care about breast cancer? Find a trustworthy research institution and write a cheque. Care about the troops? Go volunteer to help some vets. Mow the lawn for the guy with one less leg than he was born with. And then keep it to your damn self! Every Facebook post you make and every overt display you make reduces the probability of you doing something worthwhile and rai…
/r/MensRights07/12/17 01:50 AM
1

But it is a major, major part of the problem.
/r/MensRights30/11/17 12:22 AM
1

A lot of things don't make legal sense unfortunately - like alimony in modern times. However that is the way things are due to reluctance from people to change.
/r/MensRights26/11/17 02:55 AM
1

Some thoughts: short term power to women is beneficial to women and also to the government, as this allows it to get its claws on the money men earn. Government's pander to whoever controls them - in this case the majority of voters are women, and men are the minority as they number less, choose to vote less and are often disenfranchised due to crime. Since men continue to do most of the paid labour in society, it makes sense to try to control them and ensure some of that wealth is being given t…
/r/MensRights24/11/17 08:44 AM
13

Emily Lindin - a typical representative of the vocal feminist brigade. As the person on twitter responded she must have got a bad grade on "To Kill a Mockingbird".
/r/MensRights23/11/17 12:29 AM
1

Well in China it is actually a legal obligation that boys look after their parents. In many less developed countries it is the boys who stay with their parents while the girls move with their new husbands. Therefore the advantage of having boys - particularly as you suggest with the one child policy. If these obligations were placed on girls, no doubt you would hear feminists carrying on about oppression of women and women being obliged to look after their parents and not themselves, and it woul…
/r/MensRights23/11/17 12:24 AM
3

China and many parts of India also have skewed sex ratios as parents prefer to have boys as boys are obliged to look after parents.
/r/MensRights21/11/17 01:27 AM
2

Hey hzy. Yes, I'm familiar with the work of Kimmel. He is a complete idiot who profits from misandric feminism. So of course people like him would be upset at anyone who points out that their false narrative is indeed false.
/r/MensRights20/11/17 05:58 AM
1

Yep, this is what the blogger wrote: WARNING: People in the past 2 hours I have had to Spam 63 comments from losers who tried to inform me that “men and women are psychologically / emotionally, etc. different.” Once again, anybody who embarrasses him or herself by chirping idiotically “yes, men and women are different” will be banned outright. This will be my small investment into sparing these losers further public embarrassment. Stop wasting your time, such comments are not going through on my…
/r/MensRights17/11/17 02:10 AM
3

Great article about the fundamental typical differences between men & women - which are largely the cause of biological differences between the sexes. Yet we have the blog owner writing this rubbish: WARNING: People in the past 2 hours I have had to Spam 63 comments from losers who tried to inform me that “men and women are psychologically / emotionally, etc. different.” Once again, anybody who embarrasses him or herself by chirping idiotically “yes, men and women are different” will be banned o…
/r/MensRights17/11/17 02:03 AM
17

That's what makes our misandric opponents hate us. Not because we espouse hate or are Nazis, but because we provide the factual reality that it is indeed their ideology of feminism and misandry which is the problem. That's why they hate us.
/r/MensRights17/11/17 01:55 AM
1

Yes true. But luckily there are segments where a clothed man gets to look at vaginas. We need more of that. Perhaps a show where a group of women are chained up and required to strip off everything and stand around like idiots would provide some much needed balance from this feminist/homosexual programming - considering that is what they make men do in half these shows. Can you please commission this show furchfur?
/r/MensRights15/11/17 05:57 AM
2

Love you champions. Yep, the litmus test.
/r/MensRights13/11/17 11:56 AM
1

History hey? Why don't you remind her of the English Empire expansion through violence through the direct command of Elizabeth I?
/r/MensRights13/11/17 11:54 AM
2

On youtube they have "My daughter the teenage nudist documentary" from channel 4 I think. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=erFRwr9fFZw And in the end credits they're advertising some show about men who can't keep their clothes on. So I watch this documentary which is supposed to be about teenage girls being nudists and instead all we see are young men's penises and testicles everywhere. And barely any female nudity at all, except for a few old women. Bad, bad, bad. I bet feminists and homosexuals…
/r/MensRights12/11/17 06:22 AM
1

Very glad to see that naked dating show at least has full frontal female nudity. Why can't there be shows with nude women and clothed men? Is it actually a policy. Doesn't appear to be. Just appears to be a bunch of feminist/homosexuals in charge of the programming.
/r/MensRights12/11/17 03:20 AM
5

That's fucked.
/r/MensRights10/11/17 12:24 PM
1

Good to see the comments section and voting are very supportive of the author Vine. She is taking a risk for daring to speak against the misandrist feminist machine which dominates our society.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 03:14 AM
12

Is this some sort of parody? Michelle Obama sounds like a completely delusional sexist pig.
/r/MensRights02/11/17 02:56 AM
21

Yes. But effectively the message misrepresents the truth. For instance, 90% of workplace fatalities are men. Then imagine pointing to a specific example of a woman dying at work due to poor workplace practices, and then saying "why the fuck does anyone think we do not need feminism". It misconstrues reality and paints a picture that only females lives matter.
/r/MensRights30/10/17 06:01 AM
2

Wow. Great find from the original edition of Playboy. Cannot believe alimony is still around today, it is so archaic.
/r/MensRights24/10/17 06:56 AM
2

The problem is, the misandric author has removed a ton of the comments. Some of the best ones pointing out the sexism and disgraceful nature of her article have been removed.
/r/MensRights19/10/17 12:15 AM
1

Beautifully Spoken I do know from my own direct experience that many young women of the 1960s and 1970s went into teaching inspired by a feminist mission to raise the self-esteem and the social position of girls. I could name at least half a dozen women teachers I knew personally in the later decades of the last century who were proud to say that they favoured girls in class to make up for the oppression of women in the past. The moral dubiety – and outright sexist prejudice - of inflicting seco…
/r/MensRights22/09/17 12:20 PM
1

Warren Farrell wrote an excellent book called "Why men earn more: the startling truth behind the pay gap and what women can do about it". It is well referenced inside. I would add that even if you have irrefutable evidence - a feminist will still not believe you. Because feminism is not based on science - that is, evidence, reason or logic. It is based on the FEEEEEELLLLZZZZ. And for the most part those feelllzz involve women deserve protection and kindness and prosperity - we don't give a shit …
/r/MensRights21/08/17 09:13 AM
9

I think "criticizing the company's diversity efforts" is not fully accurate. I think James was actually saying he supports diversity efforts however the way these are done are based on an ideological echo chamber - and that was the key thing he was criticizing. Notice how that can change the average drone reader's mind - for instance if the line was "Google engineer fired over a memo suggesting the company has an ideological echo chamber" - that is accurate and factual.
/r/MensRights15/08/17 06:31 AM
1

Absolutely agree
/r/MensRights31/07/17 10:34 AM
1

I'm guessing that this may well be a fake/hoax case. Written by one of the idiotic feminazi bushpigs at mamamia.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 10:33 AM
1

David Leyonhjelm is a class act. Unlike most of the sheeple media who like to portray him in an extremely negative way.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 10:30 AM
1

A really good video explaining how women believe they can act however they want, and white knighting manginas defending women who attempted murder, because one of them got punched.
/r/MensRights31/07/17 10:17 AM
3

Very good article and analysis. DV laws and the PC brigade and SJWs and Feminists are the scourge of Western society - these laws tear families apart - and are encouraged under the MSM and Hollywood perpetuated falsehood of viewing women as innocent little snowflakes and men as disgusting evil pigs.
/r/MensRights10/04/17 06:41 PM
1

As per usual a well researched and thoughtful response by GWW. Hopefully this creates more publicity for Cassie Jaye and her film.
/r/MensRights04/04/17 04:15 AM
2

I'm guilty! I'm a napist too.
/r/MensRights07/01/17 04:09 AM
1

Anti-Misandry, curing feminazi indoctrination one step at a time. Well done old boy. Baby steps!
/r/MensRights05/01/17 03:36 AM
1

Thanks for letting us know. I've sat in on a number of courses.
/r/MensRights01/01/17 11:17 AM
2

That doesn't sound like any feminism class I've been to. Can you tell us which university and which specific subject?
/r/MensRights24/12/16 08:39 AM
1

This is ridiculous and shows what happens in a feminazi world. We've already seen some New Zealander go to jail because he drew some pictures. And then we are told it's the Islamic world with their outrageous blasphemy laws which are archaic and backwards. It is becoming the thought police and the dream police. Any man who does not conform to be a dutiful feminazi white knight must be stopped.
/r/MensRights26/11/16 09:40 AM
10

Would be great if the young man sues that real estate agent in a civil court.
/r/MensRights01/11/16 08:14 AM
8

Apparently this is MensLib mission: To provide a space for men wanting to push back against a regressive anti-feminist movement that attempts to lock men and women into toxic gender roles, promote unhealthy behavior, and paint natural allies as enemies. This is funny. Feminism is what provides toxic gender roles, unhealthy behavior and pits Women against Men.
/r/MensRights23/10/16 02:08 PM
2

Usual Hollywood Fuckshit. Kill all men, men are evil. Then tell everyone Hollywood is so misogynist. Most people have cognitive dissonance and confirmation bias, because most people are illogical (and especially women - and no I'm not making this up, it's scientifically proven if you look at how people respond to emotion vs logic).
/r/MensRights23/10/16 01:34 PM
1

A very interesting article. Nice talk on the algorithms of Tinder and Hinge.
/r/MensRights22/10/16 04:12 PM
16

This truly is Orwellian culture. Where the feminists and white knights have conspired to create a situation where any woman who is intimate with a man can have that man placed in jail. White men are the new black men - dangerous sexual predators who must not be allowed access to female flesh.
/r/MensRights03/10/16 12:31 PM
3

If we examine the case we note that there was unspeakable torturing of boys - a number of boys and only boys. That they used words such "naughty little boys". That their background comes from the demographic most likely to be misandric and revile boys & men. There is likely gendered violence going on here. Highlighting this case unequivocally shows that women can commit the most heinous violence and in this case very likely gendered violence against boys & men. These disgusting women took out th…
/r/MensRights02/10/16 09:39 AM
2

Absolutely. You could easily replace the word women with men in these statements, and that would flip a lot of participants. This Modern Sexism Scale does not measure sexism, rather it measures agreement with radical feminist ideology.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 10:29 AM
1

"One of the goals of equality politics is that violence against women should stop." How is that equal? Stop violence against women but not against men. That's non-equality politics.
/r/MensRights02/09/16 03:09 AM
13

As one of the comments says, she looks around 35. Probably more like 40. What a bizarre story.
/r/MensRights01/09/16 03:55 PM
1

Rather silly question - a strawman if you will. In no way did I say that or even imply that. We see that from everywhere though, because the average person is so gynophillic and immersed in the cultural zeitgeist. For instance: "I think feminists are incorrect in these areas..." "Why do you hate women?"
/r/MensRights29/08/16 03:32 AM
2

Another way they can make a crime that only men can commit. Soon every crime will only ever have male criminals, as any interaction involving a man and a woman will automatically be "misogyny" and in other instances not involving men, women will be deemed to have emotional and social society problems therefore absolving them of any culpability.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 06:50 AM
3

Just like arguing with a feminist. Rationality and critical thinking never gets you anywhere. Throwing back their stupid religion with its feelz and patriarchy "devil" works better.
/r/MensRights28/08/16 06:43 AM
2

But why? Our OP has a problem back. It is not worth wrecking his health just to make a better impression for a prospective employer.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 09:09 AM
3

Then you should be able to "swap" roles with one of the female employees and price the masks, while one of the other slacker women can do the heavy lifting for once. If not, sue for wrongful termination. Clearly there was work available for you.
/r/MensRights14/08/16 09:07 AM
1

That will not work for all men. The article in question is very correct. Feminism is the largest anti-freedom movement in the west.
/r/MensRights13/08/16 07:27 AM
1

Some good and well thought out fairer policies by One Nation.
/r/MensRights06/07/16 05:50 PM
3

That's scary stuff, and shows that these gender ideologues will stop at nothing to cover up official statistics which do not support their misandric agenda. Thanks for following those statistics up.
/r/MensRights21/06/16 05:26 AM
1

That's probably the reason he wasn't sent to jail like Rolf Harris. His accusers were boys and not girls.
/r/MensRights17/06/16 02:48 PM
1

Thanks for that.
/r/MensRights16/06/16 12:49 AM
1

Yes. Like Oscar and Reeva here. We'll see what happens.
/r/MensRights15/06/16 11:47 AM
1

Can you explain?
/r/MensRights15/06/16 08:09 AM
8

He says each case needs to be looked at separately. In other words, if an older male has sex with a younger female it is criminal and he will be jailed by 50 years, or life. If an older female has sex with a younger male, then she will be free to do that, because only males have agency. Most likely this guy is a dimwit.
/r/MensRights04/06/16 01:43 AM
1

Wow. False accusation threats.
/r/MensRights02/06/16 01:54 AM
7

I guess the equivalent would be a story about a woman killing her children (which happens surprisingly often), and the headline being "Is there a child murderer & baby killer-in-waiting in every woman?" Or a story about a black man stealing something from the corner shop and the headline being "Is there a thief-in-waiting in every black?" It simply spreads fear. "Is there a terrorist-in-waiting in every Muslim?"
/r/MensRights23/05/16 09:16 AM
5

It really is incredible isn't it Jonathan? Warren has written possibly the best piece of literature explaining the gender gap and what it actually is, and Hilary continues to exploit it, as if it is due to sexism and discrimination rather than the choices men & women make, and the obligation upon men to earn money at the expense of their happiness in life. And somehow Warren thinks Hilary cares about Men's rights.
/r/MensRights20/05/16 02:28 AM
11

I love Warren Farrell, but if he honestly believes Hilary Clinton cares about men & boys he is delusional. Warren Farrell is a brilliant man, however he does not seem to understand how people work on a fundamental level. It took the likes of Paul Elam to generate more interest in Men's rights and the demonisation of men in modern society as dumb disgusting pigs. Warren just politely goes to these misandrists and points out to them, men have problems too. And because they nod, he somehow thinks t…
/r/MensRights20/05/16 02:08 AM
3

I would question the validity of the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory Scale. I would say it is more of a scale which measures "How politically correct are you" and "How strongly do you believe in feminist ideology" rather than how sexist one is.
/r/MensRights10/05/16 06:35 AM
1

One of the best articles. Brilliant journalism by Nick Davies.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 12:36 PM
4

Tell them it is precisely because you understand feminism which is why you are not a feminist. The dictionary definition does not reflect the reality of feminism. Indeed, feminism was never about equality, it is only about increasing women and girls power. Then tell the people they are a Men's Rights Activist, because MRA's want equality for men.
/r/MensRights08/05/16 12:24 PM
18

The feminazi are everywhere. Good work with your comments. And yes, that is how I'd imagine people would respond to most men's rights posters, because most people in the university/college system believe in the nonsense they are taught there and also by the MSM.
/r/MensRights06/05/16 04:20 AM
1

Excellent post on how feminism is a deeply misandric ideology and how this is borne out in practice. Important post.
/r/MensRights30/04/16 02:20 PM
2

Ghostbusters - Fat Dyke Feminazi Edition!
/r/MensRights30/04/16 02:15 PM
1

Excellent stuff, an excellent resource on the topic of men and boys human rights. The best out there possibly.
/r/MensRights29/04/16 03:43 AM
1

What are you?! I wasn't suggesting at all that she was racist. The statement is there to let her know that her views could be seen as bigoted. Just substituting black for man, and white for women, to reveal the inherent sexism in her views.
/r/MensRights21/04/16 01:36 AM
1

Just respond by typing "I'm guessing you also believe that all black and colored people should give up their seats for white people..."
/r/MensRights19/04/16 05:30 AM
2

Funny how you try to conflate women with feminists by saying "women and/or feminists". Of course women are welcome here, and feminists who do not troll are welcome here too. All we care about are logical and factually supported arguments (something feminists are severely lacking in).
/r/MensRights14/04/16 04:15 AM
5

Are you familiar with white feather?
/r/MensRights07/04/16 07:20 PM
4

The desperate shit I see some straight guys do for the microscopic chance of gaining a girl's favor never ceases to amaze me. Quote of the Day!
/r/MensRights22/03/16 06:49 AM
1

Very good article . Strauss has had all sorts of problems when he has tried to point out that the evidence shows there is gender symmetry in DV.
/r/MensRights13/03/16 11:55 PM
6

I actually think the feminazi protests against Roosh are an MHRM issue. It is about men organizing as men to discuss issues being shut down by feminists. Although I understand the rationale of not wanting to conflate PUA with MHRM.
/r/MensRights04/02/16 07:50 AM
-2

Yes, I agree with you men's rights activism is bullshit. It is a disgrace that women get paid 20-36% less than men for exactly the same work. 1 in 4 women in college in America get raped during their time in college. 390,000 girls get trafficked for sex every year in America. Men also commit about 95% of domestic violence. Men are 95% of prisoners for a reason - men are inherently bad, and women are inherently good.
/r/MensRights01/02/16 05:35 PM
2

You should not have stuck around. Should have just told her you are walking to work and that you cannot help it if other people are using the walkway. What am I supposed to do, only leave for work at 4am in the morning just in case a woman or child is using the walkway? Cannot believe you stuck around. Now you are on the registry. What happened to you was incredibly shitty. It's worth filing an official complaint against the woman and getting her charged with sexual discrimination and sexual har…
/r/MensRights01/02/16 05:17 PM
2

Probably about 2.1%. That would tell us that men care about 23 times more about women than they do about men. But no, that's not good enough. Not until every man is turned into a white knight who will kill another man for even looking at a woman will the feminazi be satisfied. Actually, even then that won't be enough.
/r/MensRights28/01/16 12:44 PM
1

Hmm this guy seems to have conveniently missed the sexism embedded in the definition of sexism itself; "Prejudice, stereotyping, or discrimination, typically against women, on the basis of sex"
/r/MensRights27/01/16 02:24 PM
2

Judging by what is going on in Europe, it would seem his policy of discriminating against Muslim men and discriminating for Muslim women and children is actually the best policy for the existing citizens of the country. Anybody disagree?
/r/MensRights23/01/16 03:11 PM
1

Not that old chestnut. That's how they justify sexism. Women have been oppressed for 1000's of years. That's Bullshit. Women have not been oppressed, that's just Patriarchy Apex Fallacy at work, and a lack of understanding of gender roles and the symbiotic relationship between men and women. Don't let their bullshit arguments win.
/r/MensRights23/01/16 06:53 AM
2

How is this legal? It feels like it should be unconstitutional. This is a clear breach of basic human rights. One further step to making sex illegal (at least for a man if he has sex with a woman).
/r/MensRights23/01/16 01:33 AM
2

Buy her the book "Why Men Earn More: The startling truth behind the pay gap". That explains everything and is well sourced. Your one stop resource.
/r/MensRights19/01/16 11:23 AM
1

Great news! Looking forward to that episode of The Doctors.
/r/MensRights18/01/16 12:57 AM
10

You've just defined feminism. Make laws which are designed to disadvantage men and advantage women (even if they are treated as gender equal as they are written). But then these laws are not even applied equally as people are treated differently based on their sex.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 04:37 PM
10

Feminists often confuse bullying behavior with confidence. People are not afraid of strong, confident, independent women at work. Indeed, if the woman is highly competent she is welcomed. People just hate women who behave like cunts, and men who behave like cunts even more.
/r/MensRights17/01/16 04:33 PM
6

Incredible, that is a real terrible crime and both should possibly be locked away for life.
/r/MensRights15/01/16 09:17 AM
1

Thanks very much for writing your articles. Sexually submissive men are the pits. Pathetic, wretched, disgusting men. I understand that may be considered terrible by me for saying that. That due to someone's sexuality, that they have little control over, they are disgusting. However no one would have any qualms if I labelled pedophile men in the same vain. Think about that. I honestly believe that manboobz Futrlle is one of these sexually submissive men. The way he loves depictions of these sort…
/r/MensRights11/01/16 05:07 PM
9

Great post. I particularly like the reader comment: The figure of 78 women has been front and centre but broken down 28 were not DV related and 10 were killed by women so men killed 40 women and 4 children (DV related). Women killed 19 men and 10 women plus after removing clear cases of mental problems they killed 11 children.” The final numbers, men (in a DV situation) killed 44 and women killed 40. So let us be honest next year and tackle the problem in an unbiased manner.”
/r/MensRights05/01/16 05:31 AM
21

Amazing! Women prisons like a friendly camp of air conditioned comfort, painting, looking after cats, doing yoga, going to the library and learning new skills and studying. Yet in men prisons, men live in constant fear of being brutally anally raped and are at consistent threat of violence. The fact that our society believe it is women who are "oppressed" and men are "privileged" shows just how stupid and brainwashed our society is; and if people like us tell them the truth they start calling us…
/r/MensRights04/01/16 02:28 AM
1

Yes, great point.
/r/MensRights31/12/15 02:24 AM
3

The article also puts not paying child support within the scope of these new domestic "control" laws. So I guess Britain will go the way of America, where poor men who cannot pay child support will get put in jail to get anally raped. What a disgusting society. Problem is with all these laws, they are written gender neutral. HOWEVER, the police, social services and judges only ever clamp down when the "offender" is a man. Blatant sexism, and we keep on getting told that our society is sexist aga…
/r/MensRights30/12/15 03:00 AM
1

Using her logic, females having unwanted sexual intercourse with males should therefore be called "unwanted contact".
/r/MensRights28/12/15 12:47 AM
31

This is insane. A man may say we cannot afford a set of diamond ear rings to his partner; next thing he will be put in jail for economic abuse. Insane. Thanks all the feminists for bringing this misery to families and especially men, for the sole benefit of women.
/r/MensRights25/12/15 11:31 AM
2

Mr Walsh said: “I am satisfied that he was tormented in his mind but because he was a very private person he would not have wanted anyone to know what he was going through." Sorry, but nobody listens when men have pain and complain. Women mock them and think of them as weak and so does society in general.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 04:28 AM
1

"Police take all reports of violence towards women seriously and investigate all complaints thoroughly." Says it all. Violence towards men - we don't care as much about.
/r/MensRights23/12/15 02:33 AM
10

Just shown what an ignorant person you are. Rebut the points made and we will listen. Instead, just like a typical feminist, your points don't stand up to scrutiny.
/r/MensRights22/12/15 07:33 AM
3

Great... now when are you gonna make a video called "dear mommy," about an unborn boy who gets laughed at by girls in 3rd grade for being fat and having an overbite, which makes him feel incredibly embarrassed and horrible? Then he gets told to toughen up because "boys don't cry." Besides, the girls calling him names like, "creep" and "loser" were only joking around, right? Even when they do things as passively aggressive as giggling every time he walks by, which he clearly picks up on, it's onl…
/r/MensRights20/12/15 04:34 PM
1

I feel sorry for you. You are so stupid and you do not even know it.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 04:06 PM
2

Interesting article using real data and showing rape rates fall when society allows more liberation of sexuality through the axing of anti-sex laws.
/r/MensRights20/12/15 03:59 PM
2

This is crazy. If she wants to make an equivalence between killing an unborn child and medication then she should make an equivalence with ED meds and tampons. Perhaps she can use her own stupidity to make women jump through hoops to get meds for their periods. The sheer stupidity and sexism of this woman are apparent to anyone with intelligence and understanding of the issues. It is scary that misandrists like this dirtbag woman are in law making positions.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 08:09 AM
1

I gave an example law, but there are plenty more. The Justice for Men & Boys manifesto gives a good rundown of some of the British laws. The law I was referring to is the Protection From Abuse Order where the hearing can be done ex parte in America, from memory it has different names in different jurisdictions. Sometimes it can be tricky finding sources - the exact way these laws are implemented and worded vary state by state, however there is something about it here, amongst an article which ex…
/r/MensRights16/12/15 05:21 AM
1

That's part of the issue though. If a law is unnecessarily harsh and inhibits the liberty of people we should look at removing them rather than implementing more and more of them. These feminists grossly exaggerate a problem and then it gives the veneer of making it seem these authoritarian laws are necessary. So teaming up with feminism to demand that women be subjected to the same harshness as men is not the best solution except for pointing out how harsh some of these laws are. For instance, …
/r/MensRights16/12/15 04:56 AM
1

The gross exaggeration of rape to the point of "rape culture" which views bad sex as rape and puts in place authoritarian laws which effectively only get used against men. The gross exaggeration of trafficking which puts in place authoritarian laws which effectively only get used against men. The gross exaggeration of domestic violence which puts in place authoritarian laws which destroy families and effectively only get used against men. By teaming with feminism we would be attempting to streng…
/r/MensRights16/12/15 12:55 AM
1

The exaggerations about domestic violence to increasingly put authoritarian laws. The exaggerations about sex trafficking to increasingly put authoritarian laws. The exaggerations about violence against women to put in authoritarian and censorship laws. Laws, which used against women are considered cruel and harsh, but against men - meeeh - who cares about men.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 04:32 AM
5

Feminism and traditional conservatism puts harsh laws against men and seeks a controlling authoritarian state. What you are effectively saying is let's compliment feminism by putting this authoritarian control on people on women as well as men. I don't agree with this, radical feminism is rotten to the core. And the problem is most modern feminism is radical feminism.
/r/MensRights14/12/15 12:08 PM
3

I agree with DaNiceguy. Feminism is about controlling men and putting in place laws which invade into the private lives of everyone. Fight against feminism. Fight against the feminists! They hate men and male heterosexuality. Fight against the feminists!
/r/MensRights14/12/15 12:04 PM
1

As a method of protest, it makes sense to try to attack a site’s pocketbook. Sites like Archive.today have been used by climate change deniers to share and criticize links to popular climate news websites, for example. Notice how it sneakily suggests it is nasty people like "climate change deniers" who use this technique, and tries to lump others who use it in the same category.
/r/MensRights09/12/15 04:45 AM
5

It's only by pointing out the ridiculous way society treats women so leniently and treats men so nastily that we get a chance at getting rid of these stupid laws. It's like alimony. Now there are an increasing number of women subjected to these cruel laws that people are starting to care. With so many laws, it is only if women fall foul of them do we start to question the fairness of them.
/r/MensRights08/12/15 12:30 AM
2

Sorry to hear about your ordeal. It's not about how much money you can receive it is about the principle of the matter. So at least if you take her to court, she can feel some consequences of her actions. If you have clear and convincing evidence then you could well win.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 04:07 AM
2

These feminists and conservatives will stop at nothing to deny sex to men who don't look like Brad Pitt. Fuck them all.
/r/MensRights03/12/15 02:06 AM
1

I feel bad because I basically cucked myself by including sections regarding feminism, I really would've liked to have just discussed every way men are slighted in our society, but I had to please the "900 pound gorilla" in the room. What aspects of feminism did you talk about that made you feel bad?
/r/MensRights25/11/15 11:59 PM
1

Great image!
/r/MensRights25/11/15 08:58 AM
1

Nice one troll. People here are downvoting you for your trolling and for your stupidity. Alimony and child support laws and procedures were created under the presumption that on the whole men were paying and women were receiving (and judges now tend to give smaller awards when a woman is paying), but were written to be technically gender neutral (otherwise it would fail equal protection). Rather like the law in NZ (I think it was?) that was supported by women's DV groups that was meant to make i…
/r/MensRights21/11/15 01:17 PM
1

Nice projection ignoranus.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 01:13 PM
5

This is what happens with all these "child protection" "save the children" "stranger danger" advocates. It's called pedohysteria. And it's enabled by feminazi and white knights. Although a degree of caution is required, the cost of negatively stereotyping every man as a possible pedophile is unacceptable. Except that nobody gives a rats about men. Imagine if women had to face the same stigma every time they are near children and especially their own children.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 06:51 AM
1

Judging by your comments, I'm guessing you're about 6 years old.
/r/MensRights20/11/15 03:47 AM
1

You have just proven your own stupidity and ignorance. Nothing more for me to add.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 02:50 AM
2

They DO NOT contradict each other. Courts typically favor women in divorce. Equally, more women earn money greater than their husbands these days than in the recent past, so of course there will be increased instances of women having to pay alimony.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 11:06 AM
3

To quote from the comments: “We believe that men’s issues cannot be approached in the same way as unfairness and discrimination towards women, because women are structurally unequal to men.” Feminist Sacred Babble “We recognise that patriarchy is damaging to both men and women, and we are in support of a discussion concerning this…” We can talk about it within the feminist framework. “We do not, however, believe that the university statement engages with these complex issues with sufficient nuan…
/r/MensRights18/11/15 02:15 AM
1

Ha ha. Good point. Replace all to "almost all". The variations in ability from a normal distribution no doubt will mean we will occasionally get the odd great female player; just as we would likely get the occasional great female scientist. The answer really is two fold. One of ability (which is largely innate) and the other of preference (which surprisingly is more innate than one would imagine). Add these two together and the chances of getting a great female chess player in comparison to a gr…
/r/MensRights15/11/15 02:24 AM
1

Nah. Call her out on her bullshit and prejudice. Don't like this business of agreeing with people just to appease them. People should have to face up to the truth.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 01:41 AM
1

Ha ha, why don't you ask her why all the best players of chess are male? (I hope you know the answer, please ask me if you don't). Ask her in class. Then nail her. Nail her and her ignorant mind to the floor. As others have said. Take note, bring in a voice recorder. Note specific comments at specific times, and then file a Title IX complaint, and nail her ignorant mind to the floor.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 01:38 AM
2

You've definitely got it right GWW. It's not about left v right at all. I find the largest impediments to men's rights are authoritarian leftists (radical feminists, pro-censorship, anti-sex) and authoritarian right wingers (religious zealots, pro-censorship, anti-sex, tradcons).
/r/MensRights15/11/15 01:35 AM
3

The amount of graduates in STEM fields are in favour of men. Apparently this is due to sexism according to feminists. But of course, as we have learned, anything a feminist says cannot be trusted; it is more likely to be false than true.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 04:23 AM
1

The issue I care about most is people learning the truth about feminism; that it is not about equal rights but rather a totalitarian ideology of hatred & lies that wants to control men. It would be good to see all feminists being thought of in the same light that members of the klu klux klan are thought of as; as bigots. If this were to happen, all the other issues would receive a much welcome boost, as the demonization of men would be reduced, and we could move towards freedom & equality for me…
/r/MensRights10/11/15 02:06 AM
3

Those sort of explanations where you cannot answer the question, but instead resort to "don't expect me to be able to explain it to you" do not hold any weight here. This subreddit is based on real explanations - even if something may seem obvious to you. Because what many people such as yourself see as obvious, is very often simply dogma you've been fed, time and time again, so you just accept it as fact. Explain your argument please.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 09:58 AM
16

Anyone reading that conversation would see your point, unless they were a feminist or white knight. You absolutely destroyed him. And he did not bother responding; what a loser.
/r/MensRights05/11/15 12:54 AM
2

Of course I was being figurative. They deserve to go down in history as bigoted books which were widely applauded by a "women are wonderful" public, where individual men were thinking they themselves are a good man, but most men are evil misogynists.
/r/MensRights03/11/15 02:18 AM
34

The Telegraph gives a list of vile hate filled books, where if you replace man/men with women/jew/black you can easily see the hatred and bigoted nature of these terrible feminazi propaganda works. And they put it in the "thinking man" section. Like almost all feminist books, these belong on the bonfire. In the future, if we actually believe in gender equality, these books will go down in history in a similar fashion to the nazi propaganda books. Books filled with pure hatred that a feeble minde…
/r/MensRights02/11/15 04:03 PM
1

The Guardian can go stuff themselves.
/r/MensRights30/10/15 11:28 AM
1

Gender synchronous laws does not automatically mean they are fair to both genders.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 08:21 AM
0

You need to provide a lot more details on your case. As it stands, the only thing you've said is you filed a complaint and got sacked because of that. That doesn't tell us much at all. Provide the details please.
/r/MensRights29/10/15 08:19 AM
9

This guy is an absolute fuckhead. He's like we need a men's movement to say how fucked up men are and how superior women are. What an absolute fuckhead. How about treating everyone with some respect? That includes men... fuckface.
/r/MensRights26/10/15 09:37 AM
2

You are brilliant Jonathan. I remember before you started avfms you said how serious and determined you were about this. That has proven to be absolutely true. I wish to give you my thanks for your amazing efforts and encourage you to continue in your pursuits for fairness and knowledge about the plight of male students. Out of curiosity what prompted the change of name from avfms to bme? I remember when Pierce Harlan changed from False Rape Society to COTWA.
/r/MensRights14/10/15 04:26 AM
5

What has happened is grossly unfair, and it highlights how little power people have in standing up to feminism. And then we are told the whole world is misogynist. It is much easier to make the argument the whole world is misandrist, given the little value placed on male lives and happiness compared to female lives and happiness. The whole point is, a debate on these topics should be welcomed, but instead the school has decided to shut down proper debate. It would be good to ask exactly why the …
/r/MensRights13/10/15 03:03 AM
2

The feminazi gets hundreds of millions of dollars of government funding. Yet here we have poor Attila struggling to put on a symposium about domestic violence which does not adhere to the feminazi narrative. No one exactly comes out looking good. Tanveer does not come out looking too good here. He wanted to fly his preferred airline for some perquisites and therefore got a considerably more expensive flight. This is fine, if you are putting on the government's dime. But this is on Attila's perso…
/r/MensRights11/10/15 04:12 AM
2

Touch Down!
/r/MensRights09/10/15 04:42 PM
2

This when is this new news? This has been studied and known for decades.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 03:59 PM
9

A very well researched piece on the BBC's lack of coverage on false rape and the devastating consequences they cause. BBC = biased british cunts.
/r/MensRights09/10/15 03:56 PM
7

Indeed, just another way to justify the harsh sentences men receive and the lenient sentences women receive. "Having read everything before me, it was quite clear he was a mature 11 year old and you were an immature 20 year old so that narrows the arithmetic age gap between you". I think we may as well call it. The age of consent laws are only there to prosecute males. It seems perhaps age of consent laws need to be changed or abolished.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 02:31 PM
3

I never had any respect for it in the first place. It has always been pushing the misandric androphobic bullshit from the start.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 03:05 AM
1

Same usual shit from dumb people. If men are doing better / women doing worse it is because of "Patriarchy". If men are doing worse / women are doing better it is mens own fault.
/r/MensRights05/10/15 03:02 AM
2

Half the anecdotes were probably made up.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 01:36 AM
5

ABsolutely correct. The article is so full of shit, the idiotic feminist writing it has her head so far up her bum it's completely surrounded by shit.
/r/MensRights04/10/15 01:25 AM
2

We've seen false rape accusations become deadly. Many times in the past men were lynched. We have seen vigilante killings. Now another person subjected to a false accusation tragically hangs himself.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 10:40 AM
-1

You're most welcome.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 02:47 PM
4

Absolutely. That teacher is a fucking feminazi. No doubt about it. And she is trying to indoctrinate all the girls to being androphobic and anti-sex. Fuck that anti-sex conservative piece of shit fuck teacher.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:10 AM
5

When Indonesia sent all the drug mules to be murdered by the state, only the woman was spared. The woman also had about 100 times more sympathy from the public. Just acknowledge the truth; most people hate men and couldn't give a shit about them.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:08 AM
1

Please provide specifics. Which arguments and perhaps what he may have been able to say? That would be constructive.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 06:04 AM
3

Mike is a pioneer for equality for men & boys. It seems the top brass and public believe the best people for discussing these topics and interviewing guests are feminists/gender studies people. Honestly, it is like getting priests or religious conservatives to interview someone who suggests that religion is not the truth and the Earth is older than 8000 years.
/r/MensRights30/09/15 05:59 AM
7

Some interesting comments by beffardo Oh grow up. They are no more his children than adopted children are the children of their birth mother (Who, I hasten to add, is not on the hook for child support). He has no interaction with the children, as per the OP, and his main interest in them is on the financial mallus they provide him. He does not have children, he produced the genetic material for children. The financial sacrifice he has to make afterwards is based on an outdated patriarchal assump…
/r/MensRights25/09/15 07:17 AM
1

Brilliant discussion. Milo Yiannopoulos is awesome here. Takes down a stupid feminist.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 12:45 PM
5

Yes, you are a victim of the gynocentric, feminist, white knight state. And yes, barely anyone will give a shit about you or feel sympathetic to your plight, because, well, you're a "privileged male". But don't give up the fight. Never give up the fight. Keep going, and do something useful with your life - campaign for equality for men & boys. Now that would be something.
/r/MensRights23/09/15 12:08 PM
1

You sound just like a feminist rabbiting on about "patriarchy". As if men rule for other men, the way many women politicians do. Well, that is not true. I don't know if you are prejudiced or just not smart enough to understand. As ThePigmanAgain says "don't waste my time with such simple deceptions".
/r/MensRights22/09/15 01:37 AM
4

The only reason men have this "assumed" advantage is due to the propaganda feminists spread about "patriarchy" and "male privilege" and all their other made up rubbish.
/r/MensRights22/09/15 12:57 AM
2

There are so many incentives for false accusations, therefore no wonder 90% of domestic violence allegations in Spain are likely false.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 10:45 AM
1

You're absolutely spot on Grumblefly.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 05:23 AM
1

There was a study that showed females demonstrate in-group bias towards their own sex but males do not. Do you know of any other studies or evidence? (I guess the fact that women have always been protected by male rulers is evidence too).
/r/MensRights20/09/15 04:55 AM
1

This college at the university has turned into a joke. We can probably bet some of the other colleges will follow suit.
/r/MensRights19/09/15 03:21 AM
2

Another brilliant piece by Pierce Harlan. The survey which shows college women overwhelmingly believe it is better an innocent man gets punished than a guilty one go free is especially troubling. It indicates that women in power with these prejudice points of view against all justice and fairness are very dangerous. Feminists like to claim that men being in power govern for the benefit of men - that is patently not true. However, it appears with feminazi such as Hillary Clinton and this new bree…
/r/MensRights17/09/15 07:11 AM
1

Excellent post with some useful links. Thank you TomwaIvory!
/r/MensRights17/09/15 01:58 AM
1

I made it halfway. What an effort by me. I should get a medal for having to read the patent lies by this misandric feminist cunt. But I couldn't make it past halfway. Just too many lies and false equivalences.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 01:55 AM
31

If you cannot understand why the feminists are against this, you do not know or understand feminism. The back story and precedents would take a while to spell out. But in a nutshell it is about controlling male heterosexuality.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 04:52 PM
1

I'm currently living in San Francisco. So if there is anything going on in the bay area, it would be good to know.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 04:46 PM
2

If it wasn't for people like Paul Elam it would be a lot harder to get the message that men's rights are human rights. For decades anyone speaking about how men have been historically and currently disadvantaged was ignored. Paul had the courage to speak publicly out against misandry and androphobia and put his name to it - and he made people listen. Those who can think critically understood it. Those that couldn't or who are bigots just believed the mainstream media bullshit.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 05:18 AM
2

Another witty line from ThePigmanAgain. The Pigman lives!
/r/MensRights16/09/15 03:44 AM
2

I would say the problem with handing back 1/24th of your gym fees for not being able to access to gym during "women's hour" is that 1pm-2pm is prime time to use the gym. And 1/24th is not anywhere near sufficient compensation. As you have pointed out it is costing you 3 hours on a day. That is unreasonable. Is there a women's only gym somewhere nearby? Perhaps the university can partner with that organization and any women who have androphobia can go there at any time they choose. And if women w…
/r/MensRights16/09/15 03:42 AM
2

Many men have, of course, ended up raising children who were not genetically their own, but really, does it matter? You can feel quite as much tenderness for a child you mistakenly think to be yours as for one who is. That is the problem with feminism, it is not about the truth, but rather throwing men under the bus. So a man paying for and slaving away for a child which is not even his own becomes "but , really, does it matter?" YES IT DOES
/r/MensRights16/09/15 01:09 AM
12

Great reply, and yes these feminists just want to ban robots to moralize heterosexual men & boys. Feminists, religious zealots, racists, prudes please all fuck off.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 06:40 AM
3

A lovely piece with excellent links to support the wisdom that there are many people who believe innocent men being expelled or jailed does not matter. It is terrible. This is what feminism and knightism has brought to our society. Why don't we just expel all men, after all as we all know "all men are rapists".
/r/MensRights15/09/15 02:23 AM
2

What a stupid idiotic feminazi who keeps repeating stupid lies like the gender wage gap. The Guardian is such a piece of shit feminazi newspaper for publishing feminazi Lauren Bates' stuff.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 01:57 AM
3

Actually a decent article by Douglas Galbi. But despite the article, Pinker is a man who absolutely understands the biological differences between men and women. He showed this in his book from about the year 2000 "The Blank Slate". He received a fair bit of backlash from feminists for that book, so being a white knight, he probably wanted to address this.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 01:54 AM
1

The mental gymnastics to say that misandry is okay and acceptable are insane: "discredit feminism because people often confuse men as individuals with men as a dominant and privileged category of people". The same old stupid apex fallacy, and then more stupid claims of oppression. Try telling this to the average man who has no power. They base this feminist rubbish on the stupid assumption that men rule on behalf of other men.
/r/MensRights13/09/15 01:36 AM
1

Then why hasn't this been done again and again. And why has urban dictionary allowed this to stand if there has been a bot at work? These feminists actually had to include a disclaimer for their definition of misandry on urban dictionary: Dear editor, this entry does not violate any of the rules on the editor homepage. "Rule 3. Publish opinions. Don't reject an entry just because it's opinionated. Opinions are useful to readers unfamiliar with a topic. Don't reject an entry because you disagree …
/r/MensRights12/09/15 04:01 PM
1

Speak with her further and keep your voice recorder on, and see if she will make the same remark again. Just share a conversation and ask her about differences between male and female employees and don't include your opinions, just learn hers. Then if you want to file a complaint in future at least there will be solid evidence so others know you are not making it up or overreacting. Good luck.
/r/MensRights12/09/15 01:02 AM
2

Regarding urban dictionary; that was trolled by misandric feminists. They sent about 15,000 upvotes about 4 years ago to every misandric feminist defintion of an MRA and also about 15,000 upvotes for every "feminism = equality" definition for feminism. And about 1,000 downvotes for every true definition of an MRA and also 1,000 downvotes for every non-conforming definition of feminism. Happened around 2011. Just look at definition 7 of MRA which is reasonably accurate. It has about 7,000 upvotes…
/r/MensRights12/09/15 12:40 AM
1

Thanks for that Dean. Though the sources require a fair bit of reading and analysis to determine whether they actually do indeed say that the majority of our ancestors were not female; they are more complex than the average scientific article. It does not appear the previous work by Wilder can be completely discounted however. You defend the alpha/beta thing? Citation needed. http://mbe.oxfordjournals.org/content/21/11/2047.long Yes, the same article you have cited is where they identified diffe…
/r/MensRights10/09/15 03:33 PM
1

Hi Dean thanks for replying. The reason I was skeptical of some aspects of your piece was the lack of referencing. I'm not saying humans are tournament maters. What I am saying is that for virtually every successful human group there has been some sort of concept of marriage between a male and a female. Each male having a female and each female having a male provides a very stable and strong platform to progress the whole group - men have the incentive to work and thus supply the surplus labor t…
/r/MensRights10/09/15 03:19 AM
8

This is what modern American litigious society has produced. When there are financial incentives for blaming others then that's what will happen. In this case it seems most likely the woman in question is making most of the stuff up; although she may be telling the truth. Most likely what happened is that the woman in question had some pre-drinks to some on campus party with some drinks kindly being supplied by the peer adviser. She then ended up having consensual sex with another man. She now r…
/r/MensRights09/09/15 01:40 PM
5

Julie Bindel has a massive audience with The Guardian newspaper and gets to spread her misandric rubbish to the gynocentric public. Please can she be sacked and sent where she belongs. To an island with no men and only women, then they can actually do some real work rather than bitching about men and penises all day, and women who like penises.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 12:37 PM
1

Well those "most people" are stupid. Men's rights is for everyone.
/r/MensRights09/09/15 09:04 AM
1

I'm going to have to disagree with most of what Dean is saying here. From memory he did a similar piece on AVfM a number of years ago, and some people called him out. It is good that he is writing his thoughts, however on many of these points he does not support his views with resources. He just weasels out of it by saying he will supply sources. Nice way of not giving out the resources for all this work - and that's what makes it feel a little too speculative.
/r/MensRights08/09/15 08:06 AM
2

I promise to treat all people with the same respect they treat me. Note, the respect does not depend on the genitals of the person. I am That Girl can go take their gynocentric tripe and stick it up their...
/r/MensRights08/09/15 07:57 AM
4

I think you should ignore the sterilization comment. These sort of comments are normal when people disagree with your viewpoint. What I will say is what most people here are rightly thinking though. Your actions of leaving a shopping cart in the car park and not returning it to its proper place is very selfish and very poor behavior. With so many selfish people such as yourself who only care about their own children, their own convenience and not anything else, no wonder many places are increasi…
/r/MensRights07/09/15 01:25 AM
6

That also explains why Julie Bindel is so much for anti-sex work laws. Because she hates heterosexuality, she hates women who like being heterosexual and above all she hates heterosexual men.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 07:29 AM
9

We could say the same thing about violence at night, and put a curfew so people cannot go out at night. We could say the same thing about deaths on the road and put a ban on using cars. Sure, you will feel safer. Very occasionally bad things happen, but to then view every single man as a predator is bullshit. And the sort of thing we get from feminists - because they only push an agenda where men are evil. Imagine if women were stereotyped as being predators and violent and a whole movement kept…
/r/MensRights06/09/15 01:57 AM
6

It's problematic. When I have been overseas as well to other countries outside USA, the children are generally a lot more friendly to you. It is so refreshing to not be considered a potential pedophile every where you walk just for being a man.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 01:54 AM
3

This issue is discussed many times over here. It is known as the "pussy pass". Also, many laws are designed to screw up men even though they are written as 'gender neutral'. More and more laws are getting passed which disproportionately hurt men and for little gain other than filling the coffers of the police, lawyers, prison guard unions, government, and to make the moral chauvinists feel better about themselves. And of course all those who want to "protect women & children" feel better. And he…
/r/MensRights04/09/15 07:10 AM
0

Welcome to the 2010s 2020s. Feminist / white knight world. Heterosexual? Fine. Homosexual? Fine. Homosexual with penis? Fine. Heterosexual with Penis? Not Fine. No sex for you. Make money and pay to people with vaginas or to the government so the government can give that money to people (mostly people with vaginas). Sad reality of feminist / white knight world. And - relatively few people will be sympathetic for your plight. They will just think you need to "man up" and earn more money and work …
/r/MensRights03/09/15 01:52 AM
4

I did consider this. I don't think it is the type of rumor she would start though. Sadly as a SAHD whenever I interact with the children I always have this in the back of my mind. One time I was at a store with my daughter and I took her into the bathroom, when we came out there were 2 cops there and they questioned me and then questioned my daughter who just turned 3 with me out of ear shot. Someone reported that I "dragged a child into the bathroom." She was terrified and then was afraid to us…
/r/MensRights03/09/15 01:48 AM
1

The point was that male victims aren't treated with as much sympathy as female ones. Imagine if all the soldiers coming back from Iraq/Afghanistan in coffins and body bags were women - everyone would be much more concerned about the death toll of war.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 01:40 AM
1

Thank you Consilio_et_animis for the research and links.
/r/MensRights03/09/15 12:58 AM
2

The gender wage gap has been proven a myth hundreds of times over. The fact that it is still widely believed is the result of feminism, mainstream media and a public who believe anything about women being discriminated against.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 08:58 AM
18

There were studies which also showed that FGM reduces the chance of disease transmission. Does that mean that is a reason for FGM? The same way it is considering a good reason for MGM? United Nations just follow feminist dogma, which means only women and girls can be hurt. Men and boys, genitals mutilated - doesn't matter, in fact they encourage the mutilation of genitals then they say they are for gender equality.
/r/MensRights02/09/15 08:43 AM
1

Yes, please ask them to cite their sources. But make sure you ask in a friendly inquisitive manner. Sounds like another game where we look into the study and then no one can actually find the data for where the claim is based. Or maybe it is one of these case studies, where they interviewed women and they thought they were being unfairly punished. Whatever the case, it would be good for them to show you what their opinions are based on.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 09:43 AM
3

To which they will direct you to the dictionary definition of feminism.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 05:43 AM
3

This stupid piece of shit by this halfwit journalist Emma whatever can't even spell: Plus, if your husband looses his job or becomes disabled, no more alimony. Sorry. And makes assumptions, like the one above. So much of the article is just bullshit assumptions.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 04:57 AM
1

Or should that be purple poodle?!
/r/MensRights31/08/15 04:53 AM
1

It starts from reporting of crimes. Men are more likely to be charged, because they know it is easier to convict a man because juries will more likely find a man guilty. When the victim is a female and the perpetrator a male, the sentence is harshest. When the victim is a male, and the perpetrator is a female - guess what, the sentence is the most lenient. So not only are women criminals given much lighter sentences than men, women victims are given more sympathy as victims with crimes against w…
/r/MensRights31/08/15 04:52 AM
7

Very good article. Certainly shows that there are massive incentives for false accusations and any man around the world is not safe. Being friendly around a child will soon be a criminal offense.
/r/MensRights31/08/15 04:35 AM
1

Standing up for men & boys is about the most unpopular thing you can do. I have lost most of my friends due to standing up for men & boys. Most men are quite whiteknighty and will feel good about helping women and will feel no compulsion to help other men. Most women don't give a shit about men except their male relatives and possibly their male friends. I think Erin Pizzey's experience in creating shelters for women and men is very reflective of human nature and society. When she set up a women…
/r/MensRights30/08/15 02:01 PM
10

Feeling as though they are being discriminated against because of their sex is just as harmful to health as common job stressors such having too much work or poor working conditions, the Australian researchers found. And the reason women feel they are discriminated against their sex even when they are not? Feminism making up myths of men being sexist pigs and gender wage gap myth and all their other lies like the glass ceiling. So, if people don't like you because you are an incompetent worker, …
/r/MensRights30/08/15 01:18 PM
2

It'll be the usual. Male hyperagency, female hypoagency. One of the cornerstones of traditionalism, conservatism and feminazism. This is the core values of the west, and America, particularly America. On this basis there would be a MASSIVE difference if the genders were reversed.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 02:06 PM
1

Excellent sourcing. Yes, women actually get paid more per hour than men.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 01:20 AM
2

I'm for liberty and fairness. Values which the MHRM has, and almost the exact opposite of feminism. I dislike feminism because of its opposition to liberty and fairness, and it's hatred of men & boys.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 01:19 AM
1

Did they even realize that the manosphere's biggest beef is with feminism? The very same feminism which wants to censor and get rid of Playboy. The same feminism which removes milder magazines than Playboy of the shelves of supermarkets and newsagencies. The sheer stupidity and ignorance of this article is incredible.
/r/MensRights28/08/15 03:28 AM
10

What unbelievable drivel. Her misandric shit almost made me puke, I couldn't even finish reading the article. The sooner these blue-haired/red-haired nose ringed feminazi fuck off, the better everyone will be. Take your fucked up ideas and fuck off to a deserted island where there are no men. So you actually have to do some real work.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 07:54 AM
1

Whatever the sentence, it is pretty obvious to anyone with a proper understanding of gender issues (remembering that feminists know less on gender issues than the average person, just as the clergy knew less about life after death than the average person), that if a girl had committed suicide and the boy egged her on, his punishment would be around 5 times as harsh.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 07:50 AM
11

"Frankly everyone was glad to see the back of Christie Koehler. She was batshit insane and permanently offended at everything," the user wrote. "When she and the rest of her blue-haired nose-pierced asshole feminists are gone, the tech industry will breathe a sigh of relief." I'm going to take it a step further: When she and the rest of her blue-haired, nose-pierced asshole feminists are gone, the WHOLE WORLD will breath a sigh of relief. At least anyone who values freedom, fairness and equality…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 05:17 AM
4

More of the same. Feminism in a nutshell. Women are angels. Men are devils. Move along people.
/r/MensRights25/08/15 04:27 AM
3

I think a good talk would be about debunking "male privilege". *Let the students know that men are not paid more for the same job just because of their sex. *That domestic violence laws with primary aggressor are stacked against them. *That for the same crime they will be punished much more severely than women. *That America actually is not really that liberal a country and has a long history of controlling people: slavery, prohibition, outlawing sex work, conscription, registering for the draft…
/r/MensRights25/08/15 04:20 AM
1

Yes, in theory the laws are the same. In reality they are not metered out the same. Very often women do not even get charged. And when women do end up getting charged too often, rules are brought in such as the "primary aggressor" rules for DV. And yes, in theory this is gender equal, however the metering out of these laws is firmly stacked against men. I'm not advocating for minimum sentencing at all; just pointing out that men do not enjoy equality with women, yet as a society we say men have …
/r/MensRights24/08/15 01:57 AM
1

Well done to you sir for being a critical thinker and not believing the rubbish the MSM dishes up.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 01:55 AM
1

Well this article actually is not too bad. She gives some good points on the workings of Ashley Madison and the male-female dynamic. Stupidity factor however is the wrong word, more like desire for sex with women factor.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 01:11 AM
-4

"I have no intentions of sitting back and letting feminists take away my freedoms, which they seem intent on doing. Crabbs article crosses a line that no free society should cross. Radical feminism will lead society on a dangerous descent into fascism if they are allowed to get away it. " There is nothing more noble than fighting radical feminists and their fear & hatred of heterosexual men.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 01:02 AM
1

This is crazy. The west is becoming more like Saudi Arabia every day.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 02:23 AM
5

Can you imagine if she would get the same sentence if she was a man?
/r/MensRights21/08/15 02:15 AM
4

Women - get lower prison or no prison sentences, and even if they do go to prison get much better prisons. Or maybe rather than designing more comfortable prisons for women like in this article we move to the proposed British model - phase out prison sentences for women.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 02:14 AM
2

It's just an illogical way of getting through their actual aim :- outlawing sex work and making sure only men get punished under the guise of "violence against women".
/r/MensRights21/08/15 02:11 AM
16

Well done by salon. Prison rape should never be allowed. It would be great if all the prisoners who got raped could claim millions of dollars in compensation from the government - that would quickly bring the practice to an end; it would force the government to take proper action to prevent it.
/r/MensRights21/08/15 02:06 AM
17

What a brilliant change made to the poster! I love it!
/r/MensRights20/08/15 01:15 AM
8

Have a read of Leah Mclaren's sexist piece - http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/relationships/leah-mclaren-are-men-really-the-victims/article23426535/ Good thing the comments are calling her out. Just five years ago, an article like this would be lauded and most people would agree with the misandric feminist nonsense of the MSM. Now, due to increasing awareness of the hate movement known as feminism people are now calling out these sexist hateful bigots.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 01:10 AM
1

Unbelievable! Or rather, very believable, killing boys with little consequences.
/r/MensRights20/08/15 12:52 AM
0

Interesting how Bansky's post was removed and quietly swept under the carpet.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 01:29 AM
4

I think it sums it up the principle reasonably nicely. Men do not hate women; men hate feminists, in particular misandric authoritarian feminists (and they can be men - purple poodles & white knights).
/r/MensRights18/08/15 01:28 AM
1

Thanks for posting. Arguably a lot of the issues are similar. We both dislike feminism - because it is totalitarian, hateful of heterosexual males and ignores or downplays harm to men and boys. It claims to be about equality, however it is simply a totalitarian ideology which seeks to control heterosexual males by assisting in the passage of laws which unfairly discriminate against men & boys. If feminism was actually about freedom and equality, I would be the first to support it.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 08:39 AM
3

But the laws in place allowed that judge to destroy a hurt a boy's life. Perhaps the laws need to change, and more personal responsibility be placed on people.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 07:41 AM
2

So it's only okay to select the best applicant for the job/course/position if they are a woman in Sweden. Shows these quotas are not about gender equality but rather to discriminate against boys.
/r/MensRights17/08/15 03:36 AM
1

I didn't say that was the part I found hard to believe. I was just asking the question.
/r/MensRights15/08/15 02:03 AM
1

If this is real, then why isn't there a complaint filed against the three women in the hearing?
/r/MensRights14/08/15 04:31 AM
2

This could be a contributing factor in the common ad trope showing smart women and dumb men.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 04:25 AM
0

I think you make some good points Leinadro. However this whole episode demonstrates why it is arguably more important to be anti-feminist than pro-men - because feminism is the key impediment to gender equality (along with tradcons). I guess the only way to be anti-feminist in this groupthink popular narrative environment is to be for gender equality and for men & boys (especially boys).
/r/MensRights13/08/15 05:29 AM
13

Yep. Well done to Amnesty for listening to sex workers themselves and not sex-negative authoritarian misandric feminists groups (some also calling themselves womens rights groups) and tradcons.
/r/MensRights12/08/15 12:26 AM
3

The videoclip was quite good. A shame the interviewee doesn't say the reason why universities can get away with it - namely feminism and a total indifference to male victims. The women are innocent angels, men are evil beasts mentality.
/r/MensRights11/08/15 06:46 AM
2

Dr Catherine Hakim speaks the truth about sex work; let's hope common sense will prevail. Sex-negative feminists and religious moralists are a real problem for any society which wants to be liberal. That's why I always laugh when they call America the land of the free. More like the land of the imprisoned (if you're male).
/r/MensRights10/08/15 03:06 PM
3

John Kimble has answered the question - he is exactly right. It is to make it appear that gender studies is gender "equal" and that mens studies is also being looked at. It is an attempt to stop genuine male studies courses by pretending they're already doing it.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 07:40 AM
1

It's simply commentary on a common theme in the west. Men are evil animals that need to be controlled and are constantly harassing and threatening women on every street corner. The rate we're going, it may one day be illegal for a "lesser" man to speak to a woman, unless spoken to. Exactly what the social conservatives and the feminists want.
/r/MensRights10/08/15 07:37 AM
5

And ironically enough, that will be the reason why it becomes an issue. British politicians cannot even address this problem, unless it is under the guise of "helping" women. We've seen it before from them, eg. "I'm concerned there will not be enough quality men for women to marry".
/r/MensRights10/08/15 07:33 AM
0

In the old days mere peasants were not allowed to speak to higher glorious nobles. It was only speak if spoken to. That is a fair context for the way the person wrote. Though your point is fair, she indicated she felt fear, which may well have been founded. I would analogize it to being spoken to by a homeless person perhaps after money Perhaps you would feel fear, whether founded or unfounded, either way, you are unhappy with a "lower class" person speaking to you. What it means is she consider…
/r/MensRights09/08/15 01:38 PM
1

Yep the Clara Harris case. Says everything which is wrong with our society in gender relations. If a man is murdered, or bashed or experiences domestic violence - what did he do to deserve that? is the question that is asked, rather than seeing the woman as the scumbag she is.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 12:17 PM
1

Great source. Thanks.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 12:04 PM
1

Damn, the embarrassed OP has removed and deleted it.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 12:04 PM
14

This is Kimmel, we are talking about. It is the same rubbish. Kimmel is simply a feminist, and it's men are the problem - how can we fix men. Women are innocent angels, and men are beasts which need to be tamed and controlled. It's the same misandric nonsense from feminists and other gender ideologues. For proper academic studies about men, check out New Male Studies Journal, and academics like Miles Groth and Warren Farrell. http://www.newmalestudies.com/OJS/index.php/nms
/r/MensRights09/08/15 11:59 AM
3

It many respects it already is.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 11:55 AM
0

No one reading this post has any context for what the man was acting like, the way he was asking the questions, etc... Labelling the man as "pleasant" and the woman as "glorious" is adding context to a situation without one. This is a meaningless post. Man is noted as "peasant". The context is based on the actual words of the post. These words clearly indicate that she acts all "glorious", and considers him an unworthy "peasant".
/r/MensRights09/08/15 11:54 AM
72

She said: “My concern is in five or ten years’ time young men will be the new disadvantaged group. I remain astounded that there is not more political and societal focus on this." That's what happens when we continually get told the myth that males are privileged.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 11:48 AM
1

I'm coming out and saying this is a very good and thought provoking post. Well done TheCitizenAct for starting the debate and raising some interesting points.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 02:15 AM
1

Well said.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 02:03 AM
1

That's brilliant by Jason Richwine. Only 2 to 10% were actually proven to be false. By the sounds of it up to 65% could have been false accusations. Woozles are the name of the game in gender politics.
/r/MensRights07/08/15 01:57 AM
3

A genuine and detailed comment which states the truth on sex work.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 02:21 AM
1

Are they going talk about the wasted energy and carbon dioxide emissions for having to crank up the heating by a large margin in winter to maintain 25 degrees? These feminists, always trying to blame everything on the "patriarchy" - their devil.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 02:14 AM
0

Welcome to the feminist world. A woman will be believed on her word alone. And if you dare question it, you're a misogynist. The only way to stop this, is to stop the ideology behind this depraved thinking. That is, to stop feminism and push for gender equality where individuals are judged as individuals not based on their sex; not an ideology which claims to be about gender equality.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 02:09 AM
0

Seems like the OP or someone has been downvoting us for stating reality. Indeed, tradcons and feminists are allies in enforcing males adhere to the "pure" living. No sex, drugs and rock'n'roll if you're a male.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 02:05 AM
1

Excellent, excellent reply.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 12:13 PM
2

Stop trying to conflate feminism with women. Feminism is an ideology of misandry and hate. Women are adult human beings classified by sex. Now not all feminists are misandric scumbags, but the important ones, the ones who influence policy and law are almost always these types of man-hating cunts.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 12:11 PM
-3

Fuck no. Tradcons and feminists are allies to demonize male heterosexuality. They are allies in authoritarian control and censorship. Fuck no. What planet have you been living on to think the MRM could be allies with Tradcons. In the words of Jared White. Fuck em. Fuck em all. Our best allies are anti-authoritarian feminists. Who are surprisingly few and far between. Most feminists are authoritarian (but only authority against men of course) misandric scumbags.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 04:52 AM
5

So now we have - a situation where women get paid more than men for EXACTLY the same amount and skill of work. So now there is a real gender wage gap. And it's against men.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 04:35 AM
3

Fully agree. Tradcons and feminists are allies in the demonization of male heterosexuality. And then we are told by the majority of people that we are tradcons. Most people do not have a clue about the MRM.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 04:29 AM
1

Unfortunately he is dead - so no we won't.
/r/MensRights01/08/15 08:45 AM
1

Yes that may be true, but I don't think we win anything by demanding equality at the detriment of reason. We would be much better off demanding reasonable equality. Nowhere did I suggest this. but generally the issue is that men are being treated unfairly, not that women are getting off easy (that definitely does happen though). It's all relative. Both are true - men get treated too harshly, women get treated too leniently. Imagine the public outcry if men got treated as leniently as women; equa…
/r/MensRights01/08/15 08:43 AM
1

I am not saying she is not not guilty. What I am saying is the chances a man would be found not guilty of killing his fiance the day before their wedding during an argument would be a lot slimmer than a woman. Think of the headline - think of the outrage. But of course, if a man is killed - he probably deserves it, and this case, the court and jury agree. A Sydney man who fatally stabbed his abusive fiancé during an argument the day before their wedding has been found not guilty of manslaughter.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 12:15 PM
2

Spot on.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 12:11 PM
4

It's coming from the BBC. Mike Buchanan has labeled them bigoted, bias and corrupt. Others have labeled it as the Bloke Bashing Corporation. Chances are it will be another bloke bashing, androphobic, male heterophobic piece of crap. Probably concluding feminism is really great - when in reality we know it is an authoritarian, totalitarian ideology of hate. If it is fair, that would be a big surprise.
/r/MensRights30/07/15 06:23 AM
1

A nice research article which shows women are more violent and controlling than men. Of course society will continue believing in the men are evil, women are innocent angels line. They will assume, as the feminists say, that women are only violent in self defense, or the man did "something" to cause the violence.
/r/MensRights29/07/15 01:31 AM
1

As an employer who has always had trouble finding hard-working help and in an industry where literally all my competition complains about the same thing, I am always skeptical when people say there are no jobs or they cant find a job. Your comment indicates the work is applicable to anyone looking for work and willing to work hard. There are plenty of people like this out there. However, there are relatively few people prepared to do this for a low wage. It appears the reason why you could not f…
/r/MensRights27/07/15 07:20 AM
1

Seems you and your competition should offer higher wages. If you offered high wages I bet the mortgage there would be no trouble finding hard-working help.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 09:49 AM
7

Good find. What would you do, always throws up some interesting things. As usual, everyone assumes a boy deserves to be punished (when they do not even know the details and circumstances). It is similar to the What would you do, where they have a woman trying to steal and bike and also a man. The police are called against the man, while many people actually try to assist the woman in stealing the bike - even though she tells them she is stealing it!
/r/MensRights26/07/15 09:42 AM
4

Exactly.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 09:21 AM
1

Antonistute: good job for asking the question. However, your lack of understanding on this issue shows exactly why the public get duped into believing the gender wage gap myth.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 09:20 AM
1

Sounds like a typical feminist - a misandric and hateful sexist bigot. Incredible that such a large proportion of the population like feminism so much considering how hateful, authoritarian and sexist it is. I guess that is because her opinions - in terms of men being evil and women being good are to a large degree shared by the general population. Fighting for equal rights for men & boys is tough - because the majority like to hate men. And then we are told we are living in an age of equality (…
/r/MensRights25/07/15 09:17 AM
4

You want Hillary Clinton instead?
/r/MensRights25/07/15 09:01 AM
13

Any liberal and free society should be allowed to buy and sell sex. That's why America calling itself the land of the free is one of the biggest jokes ever. Unfortunately everyone appears to be copying American religious and feminist values by trying to outlaw sex work. I pray I'm wrong, but I don't see much chance of this getting through - because of religious nutters and mainly because of feminist nutters.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 04:09 PM
7

The fact that this is endorsed by every state premiere and also the prime minister in Australia shows us that Australia is following United States deep into misandric feminism which creates laws to put away any man a woman does not like for any reason. It is disgraceful. I did some more digging, and that national Australian disgrace - Rosie Batty - is at it again doing presentations at this conference to all Australia's most powerful politicians. Spreading her toxic feminist misandric message ab…
/r/MensRights23/07/15 07:41 AM
2

I think for the typical person who is not all that well informed (but usually believes they are) and simply listens to whatever the MSM tells him/her then it is an error. However, for most feminists then yes - I agree - it is a deliberate tactic to conflate feminism with women. They know any perceived attack against women will be viewed harshly (and they also realize that any attack against men will be just brushed away or possibly even congratulated considering our androphobic society).
/r/MensRights23/07/15 07:37 AM
1

Martin van Crevled "The Privileged Sex". Looks like an interesting read. Will have to purchase a copy.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 05:05 AM
5

You are making the schoolchild error. You are conflating feminism (an ideology) with women (human beings classified by sex). If you want to find a "poisonious (sic) and hateful space" you will find it in feminism, which except for the few genuine liberal feminists, is a hateful and androphobic and male heterosexuality phobic place.
/r/MensRights23/07/15 05:00 AM
0

The European Parliament hates men and male heterosexuality, and believes women are children. Simple as that. Fuck you MEPs. Well done to those who voted against this sexist bill.
/r/MensRights22/07/15 08:10 AM
1

Interesting self-report academic study. Is consistent with women showing in-group bias towards women.
/r/MensRights21/07/15 04:47 AM
2

You are a person like a religious zealot who blindly believes everything the gender ideologues dish up. I suggest you read Warren Farrell's Why Men Earn More. Here is a link: http://www.amazon.com/Why-Men-Earn-More-Startling/dp/0814472109
/r/MensRights20/07/15 03:21 AM
2

Male disposability. Sexual freedom. Not having to conform to gender roles. Ultimately rights of the man/boy. That is exactly why we fight against circumcision - it is against the fundamental right of the individual boy to have bodily integrity. So religious zealots who believe women should be covered up, no sex outside marriage, god is the truth, circumcision is good. Well, they can go fuck off. You seem to lack a fundamental understanding of the MRM. Just like feminazi who attempt to conflate u…
/r/MensRights19/07/15 02:43 AM
6

Religious groups our strongest allies?? They are most definitely not. They are hostile to so many issues we support and campaign for. Seems you have been living under a trailer. Tradcons and feminists are both against men & boys having equal rights and protections.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 11:44 AM
3

Very sad and tragic story. I do wonder whether she just said the child was not his, in order to stop him from attempting to see the child again.
/r/MensRights17/07/15 02:38 AM
1

"Un-frickin-believable. Apparently it wasn't enough that this guy got fired from his job for disagreeing with feminists. Now they want to send him to prison. Feminists are a menace to a free society. " Could not agree more with you scallywag Also could not agree more with Alzael: "It's the self-righteousness of the ideologue and the moralizer.Humans are always at their worst when they believe that they're on the side of justice. What you're picking up on is the arrogance and smug narcissism of p…
/r/MensRights16/07/15 05:17 AM
3

Cool, post it up with the names redacted. Better yet, post it up on your facebook and shame that misandric feminist bully!
/r/MensRights08/07/15 08:08 AM
1

Excellent article which logically provides an explanation of how ludicrous affirmative consent is. At the end of the day, as long as laws target men and get more men convicted whether they are innocent or guilty, the gynocentric public will usually support it.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 06:56 AM
2

Liberal feminists aside (who are increasingly rare it seems). Very true. Feminist = cunt. Male or female, if you're a feminist you're a cunt.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 06:45 AM
2

"I really don't have the stomach to go into why" - says it all really. Just believe us, just have faith in us. Believe us.
/r/MensRights04/07/15 06:43 AM
3

Welcome to sexual assault law in the 21st century: where two people which, by societal standards, had consensual sex can be convicted of simultaneously raping each other. Beautifully said. Although in practice as we know, only men are going to found guilty, because everybody hates men.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 08:28 AM
2

You are completely mad CraftyDrac. You would prefer we go back to the time of witchhunts where people point the finger at someone and that person gets put into jail with not enough evidence? Putting an innocent person in jail is an extremely grave injustice; MUCH worse than a guilty person getting away due to lack of evidence.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 08:22 AM
2

Incredible, that state of victoria believes one must prove innocence, rather than proving guilt. The Magna Carta recently celebrated 800 years - one of the key principles was innocent until proven guilty. Welcome back to the old witchhunts. As per usual - only men have to prove their innocence.
/r/MensRights30/06/15 08:18 AM
1

You are right it does not fit. In real life, I have had women make sexist comments, though not as extreme and violent as above; my response is to swap the sexes, repeat their comment, and point out their sexism. No, I do not watch Dexter, because I avoid watching hollywood feminist shit.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 01:18 AM
1

Ha ha, internalized misandry - love it! (I get the connotation too :))
/r/MensRights23/06/15 02:32 PM
5

Hollywood is full of feminist misandric crap like what you have mentioned above. Hollywood movies and TV shows are typically very feministic, a group of members of the feminazi would likely review every show and ensure it passes, and is suitably misandric and has a "tough woman" who says shitty sexist things to men. In many ways these Hollywood versions are unrealistic, but it sets the agenda, and people are like sheep. If you consider that in western society relatively few care about men, and e…
/r/MensRights23/06/15 02:28 PM
1

Absolutely truly spoken. Rosie Batty is a national disgrace.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 03:36 PM
1

Great article about Tim Hunt.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 03:28 PM
4

Greg Canning was onto this misandric feminist years ago. Clementine Ford is a sexist bigot. When will the world wake up to this? When it cares about 1/10th as much about men & boys as it does about women & girls.
/r/MensRights21/06/15 03:07 PM
1

Excellent article pointing out the misandric nature of Chairman Pao.
/r/MensRights12/06/15 07:28 AM
1

These radical feminists are everywhere. Their misandric agenda is incredible for Argentina as the article says. They simply want to control heterosexual boys and men and of course want to outlaw heterosexual sex and pornography.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 01:12 AM
10

Best of luck to OneInThree. Some nice posters there to download and print. I'll put a couple up at my workplace.
/r/MensRights09/06/15 01:01 AM
1

"Even today, women experience the massive injustice of being paid less than men for the same position just because of their gender" - says it all. This myth has been dispelled 1000 times, but it still will not die. And the public keep on believing this. You think believing the Earth is 4000 years old is bizarre, this is even more bizarre.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 09:59 AM
1

Wow. Emma Sulkowicz is sure keen for some attention. Surprised she went the porn video route.
/r/MensRights07/06/15 09:53 AM
1

Is this only for Northern Ireland? I thought Ireland had done something similar. Does anyone know when that law comes into effect or is it already in effect?
/r/MensRights02/06/15 05:34 AM
10

An article in the MSM which is actually acknowledging the serious problems of poisonous feminism. Miranda Devine (article author) appears to have based a lot of her article from Jonathan Taylor's A Voice for Male Students. Tip of the hat to Jonathan.
/r/MensRights11/05/15 05:01 PM
3

Exactly!
/r/MensRights06/05/15 02:35 AM
7

This Brian J Moylan is simply an ignorant moron. Take this "Just because the Dad Bod is yet another symbol of gender inequality ...." Anything which doesn't conform to the misandric feminist perspective that men's purpose in life is to serve and better women's life, and women can just do whatever they want, and the less they serve men the better, is a sign of GENDER INEQUALITY. I don't know what's funnier, Time publishing this rubbish, Brian J Moylan being a moron, or the public for believing th…
/r/MensRights06/05/15 02:33 AM
-3

A fucking great reason not to watch this modern trash.
/r/MensRights05/05/15 04:44 AM
5

Great discussion and points Jasper. Although many laws are written as gender neutral, at the end of the day they are about targeting men, and imprisoning men. Any crimes relating to sex, a man is charged or jailed many times over what a woman would receive; even though the law is written as gender neutral. So these issues only touch the surface of the inherent massive bias and discrimination against men in our society.
/r/MensRights04/05/15 01:43 AM
5

Something I've said for decades.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 12:52 AM
4

Actually it depends on the crime and the severity of the crime. In the case of the two Australians, there was still the matter of investigating the serious corruption allegations within the Indonesian court process that led to their death penalties in the first place. However no delay was given in order to allow that investigation to be completed, with a hearing for that scheduled on May 12th.
/r/MensRights29/04/15 12:48 AM
1

It is your reply which is steeped in ignorance. Men actually did introduce the scientific method to child birth once they were allowed to enter the sphere. And their methods greatly reduced mortality with publication and dissemination of techniques and procedures which worked. This is well known. Where are your sources for "mortality rates skyrocketed"?? Wikipedia?
/r/MensRights28/04/15 11:29 PM
0

Indeed. It was men being allowed into the child birth process which finally advanced pregnancy to the safety it is today. In the old days, women faced the real danger of dying during child birth. Pregnancy was always considered the women's sphere and men were seldom allowed to be involved in it. However, when men were finally allowed into this sphere in the later middle ages, they started documenting the process and identifying systematically what worked and what did not. They applied the scient…
/r/MensRights24/04/15 02:38 AM
5

Great stuff my Mike. He's something of a modern day hero.
/r/MensRights24/04/15 02:34 AM
5

Bill Burr has some brilliant observations, and because he is a comedian he can actually say them, because he is able to present it in a humorous manner. A society which openly thinks that being a mother is harder than roofing in the middle of July is pretty hilarious, and that's what Bill Burr gets at. Thanks for the links, the youtube poster has a number of other good Bill Burr videos too.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 01:14 AM
4

Brilliant stuff. Jezebel and the other misandric feminazi channels were calling anyone asking for evidence, an idiot, a misogynist, etc. etc. Rather than admitting they were wrong and apologizing and agreeing that MRAs are right and that feminism is a bankrupt ideology of hate, they continue to preach their misandric bullshit, that the gynocentric pubic swallow hook, line and sinker.
/r/MensRights23/04/15 01:02 AM
1

Peter Lloyd does it again. Another well thought out article. I must say though he does say that more men attempt suicide, which would be interesting where the source of that is. The current thinking has that women attempt suicide much more often but don't go through with it. Again, to actually understand this, one would have to examine the studies and the data - just like the pay gap.
/r/MensRights22/04/15 01:44 AM
1

Great analysis.
/r/MensRights20/04/15 03:07 AM
1

Good cause to support. Elizabeth Broderick is a sexist bigot, and the sooner she is put in a dog kennel where she belongs, the better.
/r/MensRights16/04/15 04:59 AM
2

Or rather their mutual hatred - heterosexual men!
/r/MensRights15/04/15 01:47 PM
3

Agree an excellent article. It's something here, we are all aware of, these social justice advocates or warriors are bullies. Totalitarian and authoritarian bullies. Just like feminists.
/r/MensRights14/04/15 03:27 AM
55

Exactly, this Cornell study shows men are the victims of sexism in hiring practices. Where is the outrage? And call for programs to educate people into the bias against men in the workplace?
/r/MensRights14/04/15 02:27 AM
1

Can you please tell me the name of this professor or link to where you saw it. Thanks.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 06:47 AM
3

I'll be with you fighting the misandric feminists every step of the way until my grave to give men & boys an equal share of equality.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 06:45 AM
1

Another book in the same veil as "The Rules". Basically withholding sex on the guy and using sex to get what you want from a man. Pity those poor men spending months with one of these women who read this silly book, and buying them expensive dinners and taking them out, spending 1000's of dollars over the course of months. If the woman does not want to have sex, fine. However to deliberately withhold and not give any sex as a rule for an extended period of time is just silly. Exactly what the fe…
/r/MensRights07/04/15 06:42 AM
1

Interesting video. Thanks for the link.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 06:30 AM
1

Comic genius!
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:12 AM
5

Problem is, these feminists promote and enact legislation which often discriminates against men or male sexuality and then say it is about gender equality. It is not about that at all. That is the problem.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 05:00 AM
1

Well said. And it ties into the fact that modern feminists want increased policing even in the private lives of people and authority over people and MRAs want people to make decisions for themselves without Big Sister looking over everything to ensure it is gender equal according to her standards. There is no common ground there.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 04:57 AM
3

Wow. Miranda Devine chimes in with a piece about the political nature of DV. Good to see the MSM finally catching onto the truth.
/r/MensRights06/04/15 11:52 AM
1

Thank you for the link. Please watch this video. It's time to stop being silenced and stand up to these bigots. I know the cost will be great, but sticking to the truth is more important. Be true to yourself. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cXvjepDFoHw
/r/MensRights05/04/15 07:42 AM
15

Great advertisement for MGTOW as others have said. Also explains why employers go for married men and discriminate against unmarried men.
/r/MensRights04/04/15 03:36 AM
16

Do it. Post it. See what happens and report! Do it!
/r/MensRights04/04/15 03:27 AM
3

The factual feminist! Great series of videos by Christina Hoff Sommers.
/r/MensRights01/04/15 12:50 AM
1

What an excellent video by Christina Hoff Sommers and PragerUniversity channel on youtube.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 06:05 AM
1

Correct, yet all the anti-sex movement ever wants people to hear about are innocent women being trafficked, and equating all people who work in the sex industry as "trafficked".
/r/MensRights30/03/15 03:50 AM
1

I think there is more to consider here. For instance, are the single-sex schools expensive private schools, or prominent public schools? Most average schools are co-ed and a lot of elite schools are single-sex; this would highly skew the results.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 03:47 AM
2

Women and girls at a disadvantage = blame "The Patriarchy" TM. Men and boys at a disadvantage = it's their own fault, they are genetically inferior too. Thanks feminazi and gullible public. Excellent article by Mike Buchanan.
/r/MensRights30/03/15 03:45 AM
11

Another incredible gender discrimination move by Daniel Andrews and the Australian Labor Party. It appears that having 80% women on boards is fine. This is also for law courts as well. How can this gender discrimination be legal? Perhaps 100 men apply, and 20 women apply for 15 positions. It means the men applying will have a 7% chance of getting the job, and the women 40% chance of getting the job. Shouldn't the best and most qualified person get the job, why does the genitals of the person mat…
/r/MensRights28/03/15 04:29 AM
1

An incredible case, but just shows how powerful the pussy pass is. Torture a man's genitals. Are you a woman? Yes, no jail for you, just a slap on the wrist. Torture a woman's genitals. Are you a man? 20 years jail. Did you just touch her genitals? Still, 20 years jail for you. Yep. It sure is a "Patriarchy"TM we live in.
/r/MensRights27/03/15 06:59 AM
2

Some thought provoking analysis.
/r/MensRights22/03/15 03:43 PM
5

A reasonable analysis by Scott Adams on the gender wage gap. Some good linked in studies.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 01:02 AM
1

Not dissimilar to the misandry in the media youtube clips. Shows India is following the West.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 12:53 AM
1

I love it how they refer to True's letter as a "diatribe". Unbelievable, usual journalism giving a narrative to the story.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 12:47 AM
2

"We're not trying to exclude boys," said Jen Sorensen, the program's organizer and chemistry professor at Seattle University. Then why is the day called "No boys allowed". This is Orwellian doublespeak.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 04:24 AM
1

Most men are idiots too when it comes to these topics unfortunately.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 03:44 AM
3

Exactly, stop behaving like a purple poodle and tell your sister she is a sexist bigot. She is WRONG. Unfortunately there is no polite way of telling someone they are wrong. So just tell her that. Have a back bone 1337.
/r/MensRights18/03/15 03:42 AM
1

Good stuff Taylor, keep it up.
/r/MensRights17/03/15 01:47 AM
2

Nice explanation, I take it you hold a research degree irate_black_man?
/r/MensRights17/03/15 01:41 AM
1

I have to say walkonthebeach that was a superb post illustrating the ridiculousness of people who advocate for male circumcision. You really nailed this one, in your hypothetical argument for female circumcision. As usual, the feminazi will stop at nothing to censor anything that threatens their narrative. Well done.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 02:29 PM
1

Gender pay gap myth busted in 1981. Nice video.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 09:28 AM
2

Sounds like an interesting film to watch.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 09:20 AM
3

Absolutely spot-on.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 09:03 AM
1

Yep. Excellent analogy by Mr Dent. Imagine how it would be if female victims of suicide were ignored and just laughed off the same way male victims of DV are. This Rosie Batty truly has become a sexist bigot.
/r/MensRights16/03/15 02:26 AM
7

Another great piece of evidence that feminism is against equal and fair rights. They are only interested in what benefits women and then claim they are about gender equality. These Florida feminist groups campaigning against alimony reform - exactly as expected.
/r/MensRights14/03/15 04:25 PM
1

Well put.
/r/MensRights12/03/15 02:49 PM
6

Another government campaign to stereotype all men as evil perpetrators and women as innocent victims. Any wonder why nobody gives a shit about men? Traditionalism, conservatism and feminism. Same message - men are evil, women are good.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 01:52 AM
2

Hopefully some politicians and interest groups will pay attention. What tools do you use to monitor page views?
/r/MensRights05/03/15 02:31 AM
1

It goes back to fundamental principles in like Magna Carte or whatever. Convicting an innocent man is ten times (maybe 100 times) worse than a guilty man getting away with a crime.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 03:17 PM
9

The whole conversation involves some seriously ignorant people. The reality is, that feminism is a large impediment to gender equality for men & boys. Therefore dismantling feminism goes hand in hand with the fight for human rights for men & boys.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 02:45 PM
5

gendercide.org by Adam Jones is brilliant. Well done for pointing people towards it.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 02:29 PM
1

That bloody jytdog keeps editing everything away. Clearly zhe is a member of the feminazi, just as most wikipedia editors are. Your original addition on mass killings targeting men/boys was definitely required. Indeed, so many more areas on violence against men/boys could be added.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 02:26 PM
5

Shows just how dangerous the police are, in that they can choose who they want to prosecute if you get on the wrong side of them.
/r/MensRights02/03/15 12:00 AM
1

Notice how the most insightful comments pointing out the bigotry of Marcotte have been deleted? Typical from feminists. Silencing anyone who opposes their bigotry.
/r/MensRights28/02/15 01:32 AM
41

Absolutely agree. This is a true example of feminists working hard to hide violence against men in order to further their misandric agenda.
/r/MensRights27/02/15 11:55 PM
7

That's right, they try to equate rape about power, not about sexual desire.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 04:19 PM
1

What a great article on foreskin and dare I say it, MGM.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 12:53 PM
1

Excellent article by Bill O Chee.
/r/MensRights25/02/15 02:52 AM
1

Feminist libertarianism might include efforts for the freedom of all forms of exchange (including sex work), of reproductive autonomy, female entrepreneurship, and feminine artistic expression. That's what the feminist writer says, but the reality of feminism is vastly different. It is illiberalism at its worst.
/r/MensRights19/02/15 05:47 AM
1

Interesting documentary.
/r/MensRights18/02/15 03:14 AM
0

Thanks for your opinion. However, the advertisement is not insulting to men. It is showing the rugged outdoors type of man is more appealing to women than a boring man. And yes, whether we like it or not, the ability to provide and serve has always been a measure of the value of a man. Just as being attractive, caring and rearing children has always been a measure of the value of a woman. And for good reasons, whether we like it or not. Although, in a modern society with technology these roles h…
/r/MensRights18/02/15 02:59 AM
1

Excellent source giving a link to DV being reciprocal and in instances of only one partner being violent, it being 70% of the time female.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 12:45 PM
0

The advertisement does not say that is how a man's value can be distilled down to. You are creating those words. The advertisement says that buying a Chevy truck will make you seem more attractive to women. I have explained why. You are saying that I agree with something I never said. I never said a man has no value beyond their appeal to women. You are a weird fellow.
/r/MensRights16/02/15 12:37 PM
0

I am going to come out and say that this advertisement is okay. This is not the usual misandric feminist dumb stupid guy trip. This is actually okay. It is basically just pointing out a man with a good looking and modern truck is sexier than a man with a boring no name looks like every other car car. Reason: A man with a bright truck like that, looks more like an outdoors adventure man. A man with the ultra boring colorless car which they use in the advertisement appears like, surprise, surprise…
/r/MensRights14/02/15 03:12 AM
1

True. But nobody gives a shit about men.
/r/MensRights11/02/15 01:17 AM
3

At least some of the comments have called her out. Seems like this misandric bigot is a most undeserving "Australian of the Year". And to think that the Duke of Edinburgh, someone who has served Australia well for so many decades was derided. Rosie Batty, you are a disgrace. A young male is killed, and how do we respond, stop violence against women. What a git you are. And how uninformed and ignorant you are to think family courts are bias in favour of men. My sincere sympathies regarding your s…
/r/MensRights07/02/15 02:49 PM
10

Genius. Love the post. Very true.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 02:42 PM
5

Elizabeth Broderick is a disgusting misandric bigot. This has been shown many times by her own papers and actions. These organizations which are ostensibly about gender equality are nothing of the sort. They seek to vilify and demonize men as a group - that's misandry. And they impose their ideological feminist guidelines on all they have authority over.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 05:05 AM
6

Good work phengineer. What this translates to, is that if a male attempts suicide, there is a 32% chance he will actually kill himself. Whereas if a female attempts suicide there is only a 2.33% chance she will kill herself. Dramatic numbers. This means we need to reach out to men & boys before they even think about suicide.
/r/MensRights07/02/15 12:24 AM
1

Thanks for the link, so we don't have to link to this clueless slapper poodle. The quote below shows how he tried to undermine everything that "Max" (the MRA he is hanging out with) says. (Max has a very long explanation of the "wage gap myth," one that seems cobbled together from multiple readings of a few different blog posts.)
/r/MensRights06/02/15 06:08 AM
1

Good article by Glenn Poole noting that typical male and female logic work differently. Male logic is by rules, defined and therefore objective. Female logic is more by feelings, less defined and therefore subjective. Reminds me of the feminist concept of "strong objectivity".
/r/MensRights31/01/15 07:07 AM
1

Agreed. Excellent piece on the gender discrimination in the British Justice System.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 07:02 AM
1

This is another incredible piece of discrimination against men with fatal consequences. We have the whole Batty or whatever that do-gooder woman's name is, campaigning about domestic violence, yet it is only about violence against women. If men get killed by their female partner it just gets given the pussy pass.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 06:49 AM
3

Excellent article by Neil Lyndon on the suicide imbalance. He wrote a ground breaking book more than 20 years ago.
/r/MensRights31/01/15 12:24 AM
5

This is not about men vs. women; this is about a socially progressive egalitarian group vs. a man-hating female supremacist group GuywithAccount has nailed it. But don't take my word for it. Read up on the resources on the sidebar and get learning. This is something you will have to do for yourself, just like homework (ie. no one can take a shower for you but yourself).
/r/MensRights24/01/15 02:11 AM
13

NOW successfully campaigned to block alimony reform - that says it all. Feminism, never about equality or fairness or liberty. Simply about what they perceive to be better for women.
/r/MensRights24/01/15 02:01 AM
4

Of course the woman perpetrator in this crime was brain-washed by the man and had no free will of her own.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 07:36 AM
2

Hey YetAnotherCommenter, just wanted to comment that your article on honeybadgerbrigade is an excellent read. Thank you. Jay.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 07:32 AM
1

Another top comment by ThePigmanAgain!
/r/MensRights23/01/15 05:40 AM
2

Exactly, this bigoted misandric woman is running with the narrative that men are the problem, not the bigoted posters. She then runs with the narrative that it is old conservative sexist men who are the problem, and she then says people like them don't believe that domestic violence happens. What a fucking cunt.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 12:22 AM
1

Feminists just want to demonize male heterosexuality. What a shame this has happened. I will now no longer be purchasing The Sun newspaper. Fuck you The Sun and Fuck You Feminists. Our society is now becoming more and more puritan and socially conservative and anti-sex by the day. Thanks heterophobic androphobic feminists.
/r/MensRights21/01/15 08:03 AM
3

This is one of the funniest articles about Patriarchy and Oppression ever. Great stuff!
/r/MensRights21/01/15 07:57 AM
3

Interesting article. It is clear the easier it is to obtain benefits and live off the hard work of other people, rather than work, the more people will take advantage of this, rather than tough it out at work. And no surprise which sex is more likely to tough it out, and which sex is more likely to wimp out. So come on, guys, do your bit for "gender equality", take more time off from work for stress leave.
/r/MensRights20/01/15 02:47 AM
1

Excuse my ignorance, what is BJS?
/r/MensRights17/01/15 03:39 PM
2

Look at the way they are trying to characterize the party. Just by cherry picking the sort of thing they believe will convince the readers that the party is 'bad' and regressive.
/r/MensRights16/01/15 04:53 PM
3

Wow. That is probably the most powerful womenagainstfeminism instagram I have seen. Well done to Bec Rawlings. Powerful stuff.
/r/MensRights14/01/15 01:53 AM
3

Nice package of H. Clinton quotes. I dislike that woman with a passion. She is a sexist misandric bigoted pig.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 03:18 PM
1

Good set of videos. Thanks.
/r/MensRights12/01/15 02:19 PM
2

Just the usual. Born a boy, so let's blame him for his own death, and the females who killed him? They had a good reason. Thank you traditionalism and feminism for your messed up view on reality.
/r/MensRights08/01/15 01:15 AM
4

Feminism showing itself to be the bullying ideology it is. Poor Kaley Cuoco-Sweeting, having to apologize for not agreeing with their misandric ideology.
/r/MensRights04/01/15 03:24 AM
1

Thanks Holocaust21 for your very interesting and thought provoking piece. Yes, I agree that the laws are becoming increasingly draconian, and these laws are designed to control male heterosexuality. It is the new form of purtianism. In future what will the age of consent be? 30? And any man over 30 engaging in a relationship with a woman under the age of 30 will be a disgusting paedophile. Which will be exactly what the feminists want, as so many women in their 30's complain that men in their 30…
/r/MensRights04/01/15 03:22 AM
1

Agree with almost everything you have written in your post. You are spot on. That's why arguing with feminists is only useful for getting experience in debating and arguing. Debating with a feminist is like debating with someone who believes the Earth is 6000 years old. They only believe in feminist dogma no matter what evidence you present.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 10:33 AM
2

Pretty good article, a long read but really gets at how feminists shame heterosexual males. A combination of androphobia and male heterophobia.
/r/MensRights03/01/15 10:29 AM
1

Great stuff girls.
/r/MensRights31/12/14 05:04 AM
1

Downvoting because you are really afraid of the criticism. Wow. Sad.
/r/MensRights29/12/14 01:49 AM
1

There was a documentary made about this case, I'm pretty sure. It is called Every Family's Nightmare. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WKeTt0wFkD8
/r/MensRights28/12/14 11:37 PM
3

Best comment: Most men do take care to narrow their legs as soon as someone wants the seat... I've never seen a single person refuse to narrow them. If they sit 'spreaded' when no one is next to them, that should not be an issue. Women should learn the manners to say, "Excuse me", at which the man will, 999 times out of 1000 oblige. Men have narrow hips compared to women, so to sit with legs together requires engaging a muscle and is surprisingly taxing if done for long periods of time. Women, w…
/r/MensRights24/12/14 08:32 AM
1

Another female opposition minister, Michelle Rowland, said Abbott’s answer demonstrated he had “no vision whatsoever” on women’s issues. She said he should be talking about pursuing pay equity, helping women increase participation in educational institutions, or improving their roles in the private sector, for example. As we know gender pay gap is one of the great play on statistics of our time. Women dominate primary and high schools. Women go for public sector work more often than men because …
/r/MensRights24/12/14 08:21 AM
3

He said despite male teachers being in a minority, scholarships were only available for women, disabled people and those from varying ethnic backgrounds. The commission had said it would be unlawful to offer male-only scholarships. So men only make up around 16% of primary school teachers, and about 41% of high school teachers. Yet scholarships are offered for women, and it would be unlawful to offer them to men. Welcome to equality - feminist style.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 02:15 AM
0

Not at all, you have just made that up. But long ago, we of the MHRM realized that debating with ignorant and bigoted feminists such as yourself is only useful for improving our debating skills. No matter what the evidence, no matter what the reality, AMR people such as yourself are only interested in your ideology; which at long last is finally being questioned due to the efforts of people such as myself. In this case we challenge the dogma that men are responsible for family violence, and the …
/r/MensRights22/12/14 05:00 PM
3

Of course you would agree, you are nothing but an ignorant AgainstMensRights troller.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 02:48 AM
3

It's incredible really, but it had to be expected. The whole tragedy twisted into a way to still negatively stereotype men as killers of children.
/r/MensRights21/12/14 02:37 AM
6

That should actually be 8 children I believe.
/r/MensRights20/12/14 04:55 AM
1

Excellent post ParanoidAgnostic!
/r/MensRights19/12/14 02:21 PM
1

The typical authoritarian nonsense from this bigoted country.
/r/MensRights19/12/14 02:16 PM
1

Feminism is a combination of androphobia and also male heterophobia. They demonize male heterosexuality all the time.
/r/MensRights17/12/14 09:42 PM
2

I agree with the sentiment. However you do sound a bit like some of those English politicians. The only reason they see the problem of boys poor education is that this means for girls, when they grow up, they won't get to have husbands who have good jobs, so they can stay at home and be with their children.
/r/MensRights02/12/14 02:39 AM
1

pur Check out WikiMannia and look it up!
/r/MensRights29/11/14 01:45 PM
2

Another fucking purple poodle.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 04:50 AM
2

Some good links there. It is not based on helping anyone. It is based on moral puritanism, and wanting to control sexual access.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 04:34 AM
0

These feminists and religious fundamentalists will never stop. This is a national disgrace, and I hope Ireland rots in hell for allowing this blatant discrimination against sex workers. If two adults reach an agreement between them, why is the government putting its head into their private matters. This is truly disgusting, and I hope Ireland rots in hell forever for this.
/r/MensRights29/11/14 04:32 AM
2

And what happens when men pay for dates and everything and then get rejected? Feminists: Just because you bought her all these presents and paid for all the dates and everything doesn't mean you're entitled to anything. Stop being a misogynist entitled cis hetero male. Male privilege, male privilege, you get the drill...
/r/MensRights28/11/14 11:30 AM
1

If women, on our still unequal wages Says how completely clueless this bird brain is.
/r/MensRights28/11/14 11:25 AM
3

Unfortunately, the violence used against women by a small minority of men, reflects badly on the large majority of non-violent men. And that is what this entire campaigning is about. Spreading misandry and negative stereotyping. What if a campaign was launched about how we need to change black people because they steal and are violent, and that black people are the problem. It would rightfully be recognized as being racist. It is not fair to use a minority of people belonging to a birth group an…
/r/MensRights26/11/14 07:21 AM
1

I'm not really sure this is getting anywhere. kfcs_frontman is a brand new account and makes one post, swearing his head off at me because zhe doesn't like people being critical of feminism. It just happens to be on a days old topic which is no where near the front page for this subreddit. The only logical explanation is this kfcs_frontman is actually you mcollins1.
/r/MensRights26/11/14 01:24 AM
1

The Amazing Athiest rocks. Another great video from the legend.
/r/MensRights25/11/14 01:13 AM
5

But that was the whole point to actually confirm that people would help in such a situation. So for 7 out of 8 times, someone spoke up on behalf of the female victim. Yet no one spoke up on behalf of the male victim in 4 attempts of drink spiking. Good video by RoyalStampede.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 03:10 PM
1

For the record the response by kfcs_frontman 1 point 45 minutes ago he calls you out, backs his shit with examples, you retreat into generalizations and "but but but no! i'm not an uncultured idiot!! it's not like that, not like that at all!! this is how it is!!! mainstream feminist narrative!!! wahhhh" like the coward you are. just shut the fuck up and learn your place you insecure fucking trash. Just in case the new account disappears or whatever.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 02:55 PM
1

This is your first ever post. It appears you are clearly a new account by mcollins1 or similar. The point scores were neutral for days, and this whole thread on MR had died down, no one was even looking at it. Yet, I come here now, and notice massive upvotes for all of mcollins1 posts, and massive downvotes for all my posts. And you post this exactly on the page before the "continue this thread" arrow. MCollins you have not answered the question. I will repeat my previous final post on this topi…
/r/MensRights24/11/14 02:49 PM
1

Can someone please make a version of that Auckland Law Revue video except with the genders reversed?
/r/MensRights24/11/14 06:50 AM
3

AMR must have amongst the most indoctrinated and ignorant people out there. Just read their side bar: Due to MRA tactics of harassment, intimidation, and violence, we strongly urge readers to take measures to protect their personal safety before engaging with MRAs. I guess their definition of harassment, intimidation and violence is disagreeing with someone. Funny, that's the same definition of "violence" feminists use if it's a man disagreeing with a woman.
/r/MensRights24/11/14 03:50 AM
0

I wouldn't mind showing this video in a speech. I think the best part is when he talks about the feminist lies. Wage gap, different biological interests, rape culture 1 in 5 and patriarchy theory and its fundamentally flawed premise.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 05:21 PM
1

This shows what feminism is all about. Censorship of anything they don't like. In this case, the beautiful feminine form of the human body. It would be wonderful if all these disgusting feminists moved to where they do not have to see this stuff, where they belong - Saudi Arabia. Stop trying to turn our beautiful countries into some fundamentalist anti-sex, heterophobic hell hole. Feminists fuck off.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 05:15 PM
1

Less women in STEM / quantitative work due to biological preferences. Less women in higher management due to women giving less priority to their careers. Numerous studies support both these truths. Often hard to find though as many are deliberately suppressed.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 05:10 PM
1

Great link. Great site generratic.net.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 05:07 PM
5

Great stuff MikeZhao. A couple of minor edits: The Guardian reports that the police estimate that there are 320,000 female.... I think that should be 64,000. As they are saying 20% of 320,000. And towards the end: Men loosing custody of their children. Loosing should be losing. Great stuff, and great idea to use the Duluth wheel. Feminism really is projection, it accuses us of hating women, when they actually hate men. Projection best sums up feminism, it accuses others of exactly what it does.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 10:03 AM
1

From everything I have read and seen about this man, my position is clear. Peter Lloyd is a champion.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 04:21 AM
1

Courts often do little to enforce visitation rights for fathers - nothing happens to the woman if she does this. Yet if you fail to pay child support you often will end up in jail. Make sure you keep on documenting everything. Best of luck.
/r/MensRights23/11/14 12:56 AM
1

It sounds like you're fucked man literally. No one in authority is likely to believe your words over hers, because you are a man. So I think you're fucked. Whatever you do, remember you are not allowed to defend yourself. Even if she ends up killing you, only your friends and family will really care. My advice is to move in with your parents or siblings if you can and get away from this psycho woman. Sorry for being pessimistic.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 04:56 PM
8

Look at their list of rules. Isn't it more like a whole sub about just agreeing with the self-righteous and delicate flower and rude OPs? http://i.imgur.com/5iATpYO.png
/r/MensRights22/11/14 12:02 PM
3

Sounds like a complete nightmare. It's exactly what our misandric society has done though, effectively given women a loaded gun to use against their intimate partner. I think it is likely you will be required to pay child support, that you will be continually denied access to your children. That in time your children will hate you as a "dead beat dad" - parent alienation. And that if you lose your job and fall behind on child support payments you will be forced to go to jail and be violently and…
/r/MensRights22/11/14 11:56 AM
3

Perhaps the best way to frame it is to ask how would women who care about women and their issues feel if there was a Woman's group on campus, and its sole purpose was about how women can improve the lives of men and how women can tell other women to treat men better and to be respectful of men, and to educate women about toxic femininity. It would include things such as campaigning against false accusations by other women. Challenging women about how they are disrespectful to men, and how women …
/r/MensRights22/11/14 11:28 AM
1

Go for it I reckon. Challenge these misandric scumbags who are creating the Mens "Sorry I have a Penis" Group. Go for it, join up, and challenge their misandric feminist assumptions and above all their traditional gynocentrism.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 11:20 AM
6

Some men's groups are groups for men to get support and advance causes important to men. Some men's groups are "Sorry I have a penis" groups. Guess which one this sounds like. Great lines!
/r/MensRights22/11/14 11:18 AM
3

The usual apex fallacy taken straight out of the feminist "Patriarchy TM Theory" aka blame everything on men. As a whole, the world is run by men, white straight cisgendered able bodied men, they run the governments and are shown as the protagonist in the majority of film and television. They make up most of the representations, so why should every oppressed group out there take a step back when we’re given the awareness that we deserve? The little awareness we have to begin with. If they alread…
/r/MensRights22/11/14 11:15 AM
10

If we are to use this rationale, then we could argue that all accusations must be put on trial with the alleged rape victim as the defendant. If the defendant cannot prove he/she was raped then that person must be sent to jail for a false accusation, and the penalty must be harsh, perhaps 20 years on average in a dangerous prison with murderers and rapists. That is how stupid this guilty until proven innocent rubbish is.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 11:12 AM
1

Can you please go through and provide concrete examples yourself and provide us all with a detailed thesis on your take on feminist theory and why it is not the hateful male hyperagency, female hypoagency, tradtionalist gynocentricism that it is. I will quote from a person who I admired: I think it is important to touch on leading feminist writers position on individual choice. The quick and dirty is that the overwhelming majority of radical feminists don’t believe women have true individual cho…
/r/MensRights22/11/14 08:16 AM
1

Feminist literature describes patriarchy as a system set up by men to benefit men at the expense of women. If you read enough feminist literature as you claim to have done, you should realize it is a highly divisive and misandric ideology which pits men and women, boys and girls against each other. People have such a gynocentric viewpoint however, that only now are people realizing the depravity, divisiveness and authoritarian nature of feminist ideology, with people such as Neil Lyndon republis…
/r/MensRights22/11/14 06:15 AM
1

The patriarchy can be thought of better as a domination hierarchy which have evolved from biological needs. The problem about using the word patriarchy is it implies something nefarious and is deliberately misandric to marginalise issues men and boys face, and simply blame it on "patriarchy". - IE. Their just doing it to themselves, so they only have themselves to blame, so let's deal with problems for actual victims. Patriarchy theory is a fundamental axiom of feminist thought, and it is a comp…
/r/MensRights22/11/14 03:50 AM
0

Mainstream feminism only takes male as perpetrator and female as victim seriously. And that is the narrative it spins. Even when men are actually the victims it is cleverly couched under "patriarchy" to still blame men for male victimhood. The mainstream literature matches the rhetoric of male hyperagency and female hypoagency.
/r/MensRights22/11/14 03:21 AM
1

“There is no cost-free solution,” she said. Well, if you have a university procedure with "beyond reasonably doubt" as the standard, not just the probability approach they currently use. Because the accusations are serious, and therefore need to be shown to be beyond reasonable doubt. And also, all this feminist training (read misandric) for people involved in this process must be abolished.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 04:48 AM
0

Perhaps you can give examples and provide us with a full summary report of feminist literature since you claim to know so much about it. The authors I have listed are amongst the most famous and well read. Thanks.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 04:00 AM
-1

Simone De Beauvoir, Malvina Reynolds, Betty Frieden, Valerie Solanas, Germaine Greer, Andrea Dworkin, Shulamith Firestone, Sheila Jeffries, Marilyn French, Catharine McKinnon. I don't recommend reading them unless you want to read crazy. They read like religious texts with men & boys as evil doers, and women & girls as innocent angels living in oppression. It is insane. And until recently, you would be denounced as a misogynist and conservative or whatever if you criticized these vile works.
/r/MensRights21/11/14 12:41 AM
8

Feminism doesn’t really have a philosophy. It’s barely even an ideology. That's the thing that the author got wrong. It does indeed have a deep philosophy based on writings and "scholarship" of numerous feminists. In one word, the ideology of feminism is misandry.
/r/MensRights20/11/14 12:56 AM
1

Great stuff with some good content there. Thanks so much for sharing this about the gender sentencing gap. How was the crowd response?
/r/MensRights19/11/14 09:40 AM
4

That ain't going to happen. Even the feminazi expect women to not have to ask out men. And if you look at the data, like 95% of women prefer to be asked out. So, not going to happen.
/r/MensRights19/11/14 09:30 AM
6

Thanks for the link. I found an interesting quote from the conversation that followed: I've wondered if the submissiveness and self-debasement of male feminists has sexual origins. A wonderfully pathetic example of this is Hugo Schwyzer's account of one of his failed marriages. His girlfriend refused to provide him any sort of sexual pleasure; their "feminist sex" consisted of him performing oral sex on her while he masturbated himself to organsm. Despite this he married her, after which she cut…
/r/MensRights18/11/14 07:03 PM
2

Excellent quote: People who oppose the death penalty do not sympathize with murderers. Critics of U.S. drone warfare policy are not on the side of the terrorists. Most self-identifying liberals understand this. So why do feminist liberals smear every person who dissents from their extreme, unhelpful, and legally dubious positions on preventing rape as a rape apologist?
/r/MensRights18/11/14 05:05 AM
2

Just reading some more articles from Jonathan's site. There is a clear trend, that I think all of us are familiar with. Whenever girls do badly - it is due to discrimination and male privilege and misogyny and "The Patriarchy TM". Whenever boys do badly - it is due to boys being naturally dumber, girls being naturally smarter and superior, boys maturing later, etc. etc. That really is how feminists explain everything.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 02:16 AM
3

True. It is definitely a factor. You can't even say hi back to a kid on the street when they say hi to you these days, without fear of being labelled a molester or something. We see numerous cases of grandfathers and fathers being reported to the police and police coming when crazy "do-goods" call the police.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 02:13 AM
7

I think the article represents well how feminists will always give a narrative to suit them. This is how they operate. Get this: when men dominate a profession, it’s called male privilege. Any criticism against them is called social justice. But when women dominate a profession, any criticism against them is called the oppression of women.
/r/MensRights18/11/14 12:44 AM
2

Not really my taste in shirts, "The New Gunner Girls" shirt that is. However, I think wearing that shirt would be brilliant. It would be a step for all men and boys to wear that shirt and proudly declare that "I say NO to feminist bullies". It would be a symbol of men and boys being recognized for what they do, not what clothes they wear.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 12:21 PM
2

I suggest you read this article for the motives behind these people: http://www.avoiceformen.com/sexual-politics/evo-psych/traitors-to-their-sex/
/r/MensRights16/11/14 03:35 AM
2

You're not crazy.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 03:33 AM
2

An excellent article on the whole shirtgate affair.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 03:23 AM
10

If you engage a feminist in a debate and attempt to educate their ignorant world view, that is just a start. They will tell you, you are bitter, a misogynist, or the other usual ad hominem attacks they throw. It usually takes years of self reflection for a feminist to realize they are wrong, and were lied to. It's similar to having a person who believes in religion, often it will take them years to realize that not everything is the literal truth. So yes, you can try to educate them, but realize…
/r/MensRights15/11/14 05:52 AM
2

What is happening here, is the misandrists are noticing that the 25% wage gap myth is finally being called out. Therefore to maintain their narrative of patriarchy, misogyny, male privilege, intersectionality, (throw in other feminist word here), they have to show there is a wage gap. Further, they have to show it is due to the above words (in other words, not due to the fault of women, but due to men - in other words, blame men, which is the default for feminism).
/r/MensRights15/11/14 05:45 AM
3

Wow, this Law 54 in Puerto Rico is crazy. Even though these laws are written as gender neutral, we all know how bias the court system is against men. Add to the fact, that men are unlikely to use this law, because the police would probably not take them seriously, and you have a seriously fucked up law. This is just totalitarianism. No party, male or female should be able to take the other to jail for non-threatening words.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 01:18 AM
3

I guess the problem is, the government gives women a metaphorical loaded gun that they can use against men at any time. So if you enter into a relationship with a woman, as a man you are a second class citizen.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 12:44 AM
0

You have proven who is what with your comment. You are clearly a troll, and I'm sorry, I'm not going to buy into your rubbish.
/r/MensRights15/11/14 12:40 AM
20

Well done Russell Crowe.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 04:40 AM
2

I think she is right that the Female Cartel Theory is the key factor which drives slut-shaming. Some good links in her article.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 02:42 AM
2

That's a strawman - "I think the MRM should focus on more than just countering what feminists do or say." Wyrn was not saying anything contrary to that.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 02:31 AM
7

What matters is the fact that no one at ESA saw fit to stop him from representing the Space community with clothing that demeans 50 percent of the world's population. These feminists are almost identical to Islamic fundamentalists in so many ways.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 01:38 AM
0

You obviously don't understand it.
/r/MensRights14/11/14 01:23 AM
0

If she lost those appeals, judges could then start extradition proceedings although this is very unlikely as in Italy most sentences are suspended, except for very serious crimes. A suspended sentence is not a jail sentence
/r/MensRights14/11/14 12:33 AM
1

I think the only words for Wil Wheaton are What A Fucking Idiot. Reasons nicely explained by guywithaccount.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 12:39 AM
1

To paraphrase Greg Canning Elizabeth Broderick the commissioner FOR sexual discrimination to enforce discrimination against men.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 12:13 AM
0

Downvoted? Is this r/feminism?!
/r/MensRights12/11/14 10:22 AM
1

Well Taylor Swift sounds like an ignorant dumbass.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 08:32 AM
1

Well, what can I say? There are actually a lot of men whose sexual preferences are the equivalent to purple poodles. Just like purple poodles they enjoy eating women's shit and having their penis stepped on. I wish I were kidding, but it's the truth. So watch out for the purple poodles. In the comments section, I notice a nice article on different viewing porn habits between men and women. Seems women really like watching same-sex sex. All I can say is I'm very happy I am not a purple poodle sex…
/r/MensRights12/11/14 08:31 AM
5

I'm not for censorship. However when you allow only men&boys to be depicted as being tortured or killed that's when it is ridiculous. Therefore having versions for male and female is okay. Otherwise we walk down the censorship road which is the domain of SJWs and feminists.
/r/MensRights12/11/14 12:42 AM
-4

Got to watch out for the feminazi, the feminazi and their purple poodles. They love purple poodle porn. It's disgusting. Take the magnet and cut it in half!
/r/MensRights12/11/14 12:08 AM
6

No. Keep them honest! If you cannot express your views to your own mother and sister, that is really bad.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 04:42 PM
3

Saying something reasonable that a woman finds offensive can be classified as domestic violence, and now that will be classified as torture. This is a feminist paradise.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 04:41 PM
1

As I've said many times. Legally thinks are going to get much worse as the feminazi doubles its efforts. However, the conversation has moved into the right place, with people finally questioning feminist dogma.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 10:04 AM
2

The discussion is better, but the problem is, all the feminists and SJWs are still in power, so in many instances the laws are actually getting worse.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 10:02 AM
5

absolutely. We are just sick of how one rule applies for women, and one rule applies for men. Men are second class citizens in most walks of life.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 09:22 AM
2

Apparently that is a point of law in some states. If a person impersonates your husband then that man can be charged with rape. Therefore this particular narrative could well be the woman's best chance to convict the man of rape. We don't know if she had consensual or consensual and drunk sex with this person and now regrets it (and therefore is using the law to completely ruin this mans life) or whether she genuinely thought the man was her husband.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 09:20 AM
1

MykeruMedia on YouTube - great stuff! Good find.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 03:17 AM
1

I think it's a very interesting study. However, there is a weak point, which may have been done in the study but was not talked about in the article. Surely these acts of responding positively to your partner are a two-way street. What if the positive "turning towards" are 70%, but one partner always responds kindly, while the other partner only responds kindly 40% of the time. We find that men who repeatedly act in a nice way 100% of the time often crash out of their marriages (when they have a…
/r/MensRights11/11/14 03:02 AM
5

She was not removed, she voluntarily resigned and was also publicly offered her position back. Her comments were officially downplayed as simply "in jest" not as the bigoted comments they in fact were.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 02:25 AM
4

Neil Lyndon - No More Sex War. It's a book that predates The Myth of Male Power. This sort of tyranny against anyone who criticized feminism has been a major force for the last 30 years. Finally we are seeing, after years of work, the truth being allowed to be disseminated.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 02:12 AM
7

100k. Great stuff MensRights. Keep on growing, and keep on fighting the good fight.
/r/MensRights11/11/14 02:06 AM
1

IF this is genuine, then it indicates the same thing all along. Feminists teaming up to "end the party". 450 years later, same story.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 12:26 PM
6

It is moral panic hysteria driven by SJWs and feminism. This hysteria impacts men the most, because it is men who are characterized as predators. So, no, this absolutely belongs here.
/r/MensRights09/11/14 01:43 AM
1

You are certainly not a purple poodle! Some of the points you made, such as the dress choice of the model were going into that territory, that's all. Men and women should be free to wear what they want. However, one must realize that if you are an attractive person (male or female) you will definitely get more attention depending on the way you dress. If the male model was at the beach wearing just shorts, he would get more attention than if he was more covered up so to speak. That's the point o…
/r/MensRights09/11/14 12:41 AM
2

I think those points could have been better articulated by the video. She wore tight jeans, accentuating her attractiveness, and therefore more likely to get attention - people are friendlier to good looking people. Also, I would say many of the points, such as unattractive women feeling jealous about getting no attention are true. I actually think the video is very good, it gets to the meat of radical feminism. That is, the demonization of male heterosexuality. Also find it interesting how you …
/r/MensRights08/11/14 03:10 PM
2

How about a new policy which means manufacturers have to offer the same level of product choice for men as women. So mens clothing must be stocked in plenty of colors and styles, just like womens clothing. And how about men also get into nightclubs for free or discount rates?
/r/MensRights08/11/14 10:50 AM
2

Sounds like an excellent book, one which gives us information largely hidden away. I will have to buy this one! The Suffragette Bombers by Simon Webb. Looking forward to reading it.
/r/MensRights08/11/14 10:29 AM
2

It shows how gynocentric we are as a society that we will consider closing down prisons for women and it is a serious government policy consideration. Imagine if we had the gender equality of closing down all prisons?
/r/MensRights08/11/14 12:01 AM
1

You must be talking about feminism right? That's the backwards point of view sex-negative ideology. People like you are hilarious, ignorant and believe in unicorns.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 11:58 PM
1

Here is an excellent article by Dr Murray Strauss which looks at how feminism corrupts research on domestic violence. http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/how-feminists-corrupt-dv-research/ Feminism works by trivializing any issues men&boys face, so the narrative can always be about female victimhood. Men and boys used to have to work in the coal mines in the 19th century, yet they were "oppressing women" and "women were oppressed". Indeed, the work was so bad, only males aged 12 and up were all…
/r/MensRights07/11/14 11:47 PM
1

Here, read this article by Dr Murray Strauss: http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/how-feminists-corrupt-dv-research/
/r/MensRights07/11/14 07:37 AM
1

Let us know how you go. Do a search for Murray Strauss. He has written extensively on how domestic violence figures and studies are manipulated to make it seem like only men&boys are the aggressors and women&girls are the only victims.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 07:36 AM
6

An absolutely brilliant post articulating why dismantling feminism is step one for men & boys achieving gender equality and the end to the demonization of men and male normative sexuality.
/r/MensRights07/11/14 05:37 AM
4

In a dissenting opinion, Washington Supreme Court justices wrote the decision would undo years of progress in rape cases and could allow some sex offenders to go free. Why don't we just make the law that anyone even accused of rape has to go to prison for life. Then if anyone wanted to repeal such a law we can argue that this "could allow some sex offenders to go free". Unbelievable.
/r/MensRights06/11/14 12:36 AM
25

Wow, is that actually for real?
/r/MensRights04/11/14 01:16 AM
12

What an unbelievable article. Implying that only when men start white knighting do accusations by women get taken seriously. What planet is she on? Oh, that's right, the women are oppressed and men are rulers false narrative planet. I am guessing that she is a member of the feminazi.
/r/MensRights02/11/14 02:39 PM
1

The COBOL conversation is the best part of this topic! I avoided learning COBOL.
/r/MensRights27/10/14 01:11 PM
2

The fact that rape has become so complex and confused in meaning to have a complicated flow chart shows just how delicate this subject matter is. I thought it was simply sex without consent. The problem is feminists then make out that consent must be enthusiastic and must be every step of the way, and that is just not how human beings mate.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 01:31 PM
1

The Second Sexism - David Benatar. I would say it is not only just a lack of understanding by women, but also by society. We see it repeated ad nausem that men have it easy, that they get paid more for the same job (not true) that 1 in 5 women gets on campus gets raped (not true). That male privilege, wage gap and the patriarchy mean it is good to be a man. All that stuff is just not true in the way most people understand it. So it is difficult for a man to accept he is being discriminated again…
/r/MensRights26/10/14 02:32 AM
6

And what would've happened if she was smarter with her story, he could have spent 20 years in prison. This is crazy. And she gets 32 days in an easy women's prison. Should have been 5 years in prison.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 02:00 AM
6

You should read that book by Lorah Vincent, Self Made Man. Or called something similar. It's about a woman disguising herself as a man, and expecting there would be all this male privilege and misogyny talk. Instead she found there was less privilege, people would not help you, you had no sympathy and that people would not notice you. She found out this thing called "male privilege" is largely BS. Anyhow, chin up, and keep working, and have confidence in yourself.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 01:56 AM
2

Great idea for a movie! I wonder who would watch it? Surely there must be one movie which has been done with this idea.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 01:49 AM
2

Excellent post, because of all the links showing that violence is not a gendered issue despite all the rubbish feminists and the MSM come up with.
/r/MensRights26/10/14 01:23 AM
1

Would a girl be sacked if she had short hair? If not, then why are girls allowed to choose between girl or boy dress code and boys are only allowed a boy dress code?
/r/MensRights24/10/14 05:02 AM
2

Very good. The article decomposes the false 1 in 5 American women are raped or whatever statistic.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 04:54 AM
3

We will remain committed to the advancement of gender equality, and the dismantling of patriarchy, which is the real cause of so much pain for women and men around the world. Says it all really! Blame everything on "The Patriarchy TM"
/r/MensRights24/10/14 04:38 AM
1

A very good analysis of the bullshit of FCKH8's stupid feminist video. Using little girls to further the feminazi message.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 12:57 AM
2

I would say a very good article which provides more evidence on how feminist organizations operate on a misandric level and deny basic human rights to men, in this case access to their own children. How crazy that we keep on hearing that feminism is about equality, utter nonsense.
/r/MensRights24/10/14 12:36 AM
2

Exactly, you can frame this any way you please. And the way these feminazi frame everything is: any problem men & boys are to blame! Incredible. You will find the majority of boys in a liberal country will be happy for girls to wear less clothes if the girl wants to wear less clothes. Yet, they still find a way to manufacture the language to blame men&boys. Here's a tip, why not look into the actual reasons for this policy. Who are the people who complain most when girls wear less clothes? Tip, …
/r/MensRights23/10/14 05:22 AM
2

One night I ended up back in a girl’s room after a first date (those do happen in college). She had invited me in and was clearly attracted to me. We were kissing on her bed, outer layers of clothing removed, but when my hands wandered downward she said, “No, wait.” I waited. She began kissing me again, passionately, so again I moved to remove her underwear. “Stop,” she said, “this is too fast.” I stopped. “That’s fine,” I said. I kissed her again and left soon after, looking forward to seeing h…
/r/MensRights22/10/14 05:40 AM
6

Having just read the article in question I'm going to agree with Herbert Purdy to an extent. The extreme terrorist movement would still be around today if not for OBL, he definitely assisted though. What OBL has assisted in doing is creating a more Orwellian style world, where all online activities tend to be monitored for fear of terrorism. And with Malala Yousafzai, we will also have a more monitored world and she has assisted in creating a more misandric world by effectively heaping all blame…
/r/MensRights22/10/14 05:13 AM
3

It will be this one: http://www.avoiceformen.com/gynocentrism/malala-yousafzai-far-better-than-a-martyr-for-feminism/
/r/MensRights22/10/14 05:02 AM
2

“I hope you’re paid equally to your male counterparts!” Unfortunately, no I am not. But I appreciate you understanding that it’s an issue in this country. Says it all about this article really.
/r/MensRights22/10/14 01:32 AM
5

Just point out that feminism does not equal women. Feminism is an ideology based on patriarchy theory, women are human beings classified by sex. Just leave it simple like that. Can also point out that your understanding is that MRAs advocate equality for men & boys and to end discrimination against men & boys. What's wrong with people being treated equally without being discriminated against based on the way they are born?
/r/MensRights22/10/14 01:05 AM
1

Excellent post, doing your on secondary research from primary source data. Well done.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 09:17 AM
1

Perhaps you are confusing egalitarianism with "feminism on paper".
/r/MensRights19/10/14 11:18 PM
1

Feminism does not equal women. Feminism and women are two separate items, that is basic stuff. Feminism is an ideology which is fundamentally flawed and an academic fraud. Women are adult humans classified by sex. You have a long way to go to understanding how fraudulent and deceptive feminism is. However, you have taken the time to come here and discuss the issues. Well done for that, and good luck on your paper.
/r/MensRights19/10/14 02:02 PM
6

Their key desired outcomes sound very positive for fair parenting: Guaranteed 50/50 share care on separation with mandatory enforcement. Remove CSA calculations and replace with a flat rate child payment based on New Start calculations. Cap the costs associated with family court access. Criminalize parental alienation as child abuse. Payers deserve a more equatable system that promotes shared costs with shared parenting, that doesn’t impact on income changes. Payees should be encouraged to re-en…
/r/MensRights19/10/14 01:49 PM
2

Yep, very typical feminist. Though recently feminists would say men have got no problems due to male privilege and patriarchy. Now they actually have to acknowledge men and boys have problems, thanks to us advocates for equality. Give yourselves a pat on the back.
/r/MensRights18/10/14 12:11 PM
2

Feminism in academia is very misandric. Feminism is like a form of indoctrination at universities. I would think your professor would be unhappy if you were to question the very fabric of feminism (male privilege, gender wage gap, patriarchy - which are all bogus by the way). Feminism as a whole is the mainstream ideology. It is how everything ends up as sexist against women. For instance, if you say a boy is like a girl, you are being sexist - against girls (by implying girls are weak or whatev…
/r/MensRights18/10/14 12:08 PM
-1

You tell em. Exactly, don't be polite. Call out these misandric bigots for what they are - feminist rats.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 09:29 AM
-1

I agree, don't be polite. Call these feminist pigs what they are - feminist rats. That has nothing at all to do with being a women or hating women. It has everything to do with being against an ideology which is toxic, misandrist, gynocentric and above all is highly pervasive in every facet of our society, especially in our private lives.
/r/MensRights16/10/14 09:28 AM
2

Nice analysis Objectivist. You are absolutely spot on. The most telling quote was definitely But for the sake of both boys and girls we need to challenge our assumptions about boys' capabilities, and expect and encourage them to be just as responsible, respectful and empathetic as girls.
/r/MensRights15/10/14 02:20 PM
1

Economic -4.4, Social/Authority: -3.1
/r/MensRights15/10/14 10:09 AM
1

I agree, the name is gay.
/r/MensRights14/10/14 03:24 PM
2

top comment
/r/MensRights14/10/14 03:02 PM
1

Nice to see the article actually calling out the group of people who are responsible for this - feminists. As usual we will get the NAFALT. However, this is mainstream feminism.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 11:54 PM
212

This myth of gender wage gap just will not die! Conclusion - the general public are not smart enough to think for themselves and as long as something sounds 'plausible' and is from a mainstream media outlet they will tend to believe it. The public need to be educated with the truth - enter the MHRM.
/r/MensRights12/10/14 07:59 AM
6

I think it would be good to talk about the issues: Child custody bias against men) family court corruption alimony, child support, jail for failure to pay child support Lack of proper due process for men) court sentencing and charging bias and gap for men named and shamed just on an accusation affirmative consent, rape culture Demonization of male sexuality) male agency/female hypoagency men required to initiate contact with women, yet creep shamed if not attractive. draconian sex work laws Empa…
/r/MensRights11/10/14 05:04 AM
2

This crazy feminist myth just refuses to die!
/r/MensRights11/10/14 04:53 AM
3

That is a correct observation 357.
/r/MensRights10/10/14 06:17 AM
1

The Pigman Lives!
/r/MensRights08/10/14 03:04 PM
3

Agreed. Being called "Creepy" "Misogynist" "Male Privilege" is just par for the course for believing boys and men deserve equal rights, responsibilities and empathy as girls and women.
/r/MensRights04/10/14 07:56 AM
2

:-) I certainly did not say not to fight! Fight hard, but just be aware that most boys and men are blue pillers.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 01:30 PM
3

There'll be way too many white knights for that to happen unfortunately.
/r/MensRights30/09/14 12:00 AM
2

A study in 2010 found that 80% of crashes in New York City that kill or seriously injure pedestrians involve male drivers. Women drivers are simply better. How about a link to the study? And what percentage of drivers are male, considering that 99% of cab drivers in New York are male? There are other factors as well, such as importance of knowing the city - so how one can conclude that makes women better is bizarre. But welcome to 2014, where men are the underclass, and women are the superior cl…
/r/MensRights28/09/14 01:28 PM
1

Abusers can be male or female, and victims of that abuse can be male or female. Unfortunately, social conservatives and the feminazi just don't see it that way. You will definitely find support here. Sounds like you are adjusting reasonably well to your new life, I hope you are enjoying your career in the air force.
/r/MensRights27/09/14 03:00 AM
2

Mainline feminism has failed to address...the vast yawning void in male identity today. Sorry, young man, but if there is a "vast yawning void in male identity," which there really isn't, it is caused by "mainstream" feminism, not to mention the more radical feminism that has nothing but disdain for men. "Mainstream" feminism in law, society, and media has long derided, denigrated, and belittled men, blamed men for imaginary problems, and dismissed men's issues and concerns. There have been atte…
/r/MensRights26/09/14 12:18 AM
1

hence their laser precision and keen eyesight. How do you figure this to be true??
/r/MensRights25/09/14 03:40 AM
4

Nope. Using logic in an argument with a feminist is rape.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 01:35 AM
27

Godwin be damned. They are called the feminazi for a reason.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 01:14 AM
3

Obviously the feminazi & white knights got upset by this article and had it removed. Very good article, very good advice on setting a system in place which encourages responsible drinking.
/r/MensRights25/09/14 01:13 AM
3

Ally Fogg used to be a white knight mangina sort of person. The MHRM then continually criticized his work. I sent many comments on his articles explaining why he was bigoted in his views. Then he showed something feminists do not have, he actually critically assessed his own views. Now we have an Ally Fogg who is conscious that gender equality is a male issue as well (and I mean males face discrimination and violence arguably on a much greater level than females).
/r/MensRights24/09/14 02:38 PM
-1

Bob's Burgers appeared to be the usual feminist approved nonsense when I watched five minutes of it years ago. Don't watch this rubbish.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 12:00 PM
1

The feminazi and manginas will stop at nothing. Fight them, fight them and never give up. Fight them and never give up. I will never give up fighting.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 04:54 AM
3

Another great article from Jonathan. I guess it is nothing new for all us MHRM veterans, however it is useful for those entering academia and do not understand what Men's Studies are about. Men's Studies should be renamed to "Why Men are Evil and Women are Angels Studies" - pretty much the same as academic feminism.
/r/MensRights21/09/14 04:48 AM
1

People like me have to be so careful with what we say and do around women. Even when we're being polite, or kind, or just trying to help, or just giving credit where it is due, or just telling someone we miss their friendship, it gets mis-interpreted. I know I've lost friends because something I did to look out for that person got mixed up with the romantic angle, even though that was never my intention. In general, if your attractive, there's one set of rules, and if you're not, there's another…
/r/MensRights17/09/14 07:04 AM
1

Afghanistan is a country known for traditionally having young boys anally raped by men, and men keeping heaps of these dancing boys and anally raping them. Not my idea of a good country. More like a disgusting country.
/r/MensRights17/09/14 07:02 AM
3

So, if women have a natural tendency to avoid making direct, verbal first time relationship initiatives, should they be relieved of "equal responsibilities" in this area? That is an intriguing question. We certainly don't let men use the "but it is only natural" excuse to justify some of their more antisocial behaviors. Should we give women "a sexual inequality pass" because it is just one part of a natural courtship script? Or, should we encourage women to make more risky initiatives? Should me…
/r/MensRights17/09/14 01:23 AM
4

Wow, what a very useful page of links and real information and evidence. Well done.
/r/MensRights15/09/14 05:56 AM
1

Fantastic two liner.
/r/MensRights11/09/14 02:07 AM
1

Murray Strauss from memory is the man, and yeah, great link above cellardoor. Whenever I discuss this issue with anyone random, they completely refuse to believe it and think I am a misogynist. The ignorance from the average dumb woman is incredible, men are not much better.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 04:03 PM
1

That's what always happens with these stupid ignorant people. Call them out on their misandrist bullshit and they just delete, because they cannot handle the truth. Women typically unfriend because their minds explode, at least men typically will continue to discuss it.
/r/MensRights10/09/14 04:01 PM
6

Welcome to the modern world. When the perpetrator of a crime is female, and the victim is male, only the family and friends of the victim seem to care. Here, a boy is 'raped' and then forced to pay thousands for being raped, and the woman gets paid for being a 'rapist'.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 09:45 AM
0

It is food for thought, I was simply reporting on news relevant to a gender based forum. Imagine if the genders were reversed? But I guess you are using the standard misandric feminist argument. Sexism against men should not be taken seriously due to patriarchy and systematic oppression of women.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 06:51 AM
1

Here people go on again looking at things with a prejudiced lens. I passed no judgement on what happened, I simply reported on it. This is a society which separates people and segregates them based on their sex. If you have something constructive to say, please say it, otherwise pointless comments like yours above add nothing to the conversation.
/r/MensRights04/09/14 06:48 AM
-2

The best thing about CA are the female porn stars.
/r/MensRights29/08/14 02:11 PM
2

I think these sorts of articles are actually very important in our understanding of men's issues. This sort of analysis by Glen Poole gives us an alternative point of view of how young men were shamed and indeed sacked from their jobs in order to get them to enlist in the slaughter of WWI. This presents a different story to the false feminist narrative that "men are privileged and always have been".
/r/MensRights29/08/14 01:41 AM
1

My pleasure, thank you for your statistical analysis. Keep up the good work in examining misleading statistics and how they are "manufactured".
/r/MensRights24/08/14 02:09 AM
2

I think you are just feeding this troll. Just reading through the "story" again, and it appears even more likely it is just a made up fictional story and trolling to paint out the MHRM as sympathizers to men who hate their children when things get slightly difficult. I mean read the comments: From the son: "Why? Oh and will you drive me to my friend?" From the daughter: "Like a leather jacket. Please? You'd be the best dad ever." They are completely normal children comments. Okay guys. I'm calli…
/r/MensRights18/08/14 12:17 PM
3

Just reading through the "story" again, and it appears even more likely it is just a made up fictional story and trolling to paint out the MHRM as sympathizers to men who hate their children when things get slightly difficult. I mean read the comments: From the son: "Why? Oh and will you drive me to my friend?" From the daughter: "Like a leather jacket. Please? You'd be the best dad ever." They are completely normal children comments. Okay guys. I'm calling bullshit. This is a troll.
/r/MensRights18/08/14 03:30 AM
12

This honestly sounds like a troll making all of this up. I could be wrong, but that is my opinion. He is trying to conform to the stereotype that fathers do not unconditionally love their children, and are infact "deadbeat dads" if it gets "too hard" for them. This is clear what needs to be done. You need to do a supernanny style of change. For instance, your son and daughter can get lifts and can go out to concerts etc. and get money if they do their chores, and if they ask politely. This appea…
/r/MensRights18/08/14 01:41 AM
5

A pretty fabulous comment there roger, really sums it up.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 12:45 AM
1

It is liberty which frees men from their traditional obligations and gender roles which is at the heart of the MHRM.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 12:08 PM
1

Pretty awesome video and some great advice there by ramzpaul.
/r/MensRights16/08/14 12:07 PM
1

To quote from others here: It is important to contextualize casualties when it comes to stuff like what is happening in Gaza. What is problematic isn't that there is reference to "Women and children", but that there isn't reference to "Men". The specific phrasing of "including women and children" elevates women so that they are perceived to be more important than the men that died, or possibly that women are like children. The information could have been broken down to 900 Men have died, 200 wom…
/r/MensRights11/08/14 08:21 AM
1

I think, by and general, we are the MHRM are a libertarian movement, and therefore we respect people should be given more freedom. That means being less harsh on consensual sex. The major problem is, if the genders were reversed, then there would be hell to pay for the older male involved - that's the problem the MHRM has - the sexism in it all.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 08:17 AM
1

Some really good statistical analysis here. Pretty obvious stuff to regulars here, but very good for newbies to gender equality.
/r/MensRights11/08/14 03:34 AM
1

Women are grouped with children to indicate we should feel really badly about those deaths. Children have their entire lives in front of them and are considered "innocent" therefore, their lives are given implicitly higher value, particularly in conflicts.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 08:26 AM
1

Of course it makes no sense. The whole idea is to make only men guilty and make society to hate men even more. And equally make all women innocent. This is feminism, this is misandrism, this is heterophobia.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 01:54 AM
1

This whole heteroandrophobia is driven by feminists peddling their disgusting Swedish Sex Model. Where of course, only men can be found guilty, and only men are evil, and all women are all angels, and have no agency, and can make no decisions, and are children. This is the feminazi people. Fuck em. Fuck the feminazi. I applaud anyone who stands up to these puritan androphobic heterophobic evil doers.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 01:51 AM
4

She is quite possibly the most vile despicable person in the entire universe. She is a shockingly sexist androphobic misandrist.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 01:05 PM
0

1400 people were killed including 540 women and children. Yep, "u just have to be a man of certain age and killing you is ok"
/r/MensRights07/08/14 01:04 PM
2

The most interesting thing there was the relative gender parity in suicide in the countries of Hong Kong and China. Also, eastern Europe had a comparatively low rate of female suicides.
/r/MensRights05/08/14 03:50 AM
3

So many people made complaints about that sexist piece of tripe by Nivea, and nothing happened. I don't buy any Nivea products anymore and nor will I do so again. Great stuff by Mens Rights Sydney for continuing to follow and monitor this story.
/r/MensRights03/08/14 07:41 AM
3

Marcruise, you sound like a person who understands the way things work in academia. Very good that you were able to examine the study and identify the critical findings, then also examine how many future studies cited the original.
/r/MensRights31/07/14 03:05 AM
1

What's with the downvotes, which sexuality is more disgusting than homosexual paedophilia?
/r/MensRights29/07/14 10:39 AM
1

All the links are dead unfortunately. Arguably the greatest writer in men's rights has been removed completely.
/r/MensRights29/07/14 10:38 AM
2

Cannot understand why this has not got more upvotes. Real analysis and dissection of a policy controlled and created by misandric feminists. It was the Labour party who were responsible for this misandric policy when they created it in government through their feminist wing. The legendary Kyle L wrote an amazing piece on the evolution of this policy, which was on AvFM, then during 2011/2012 all his articles were removed. He then set up his own website Of Fathers Men & Boys, and was then targeted…
/r/MensRights17/07/14 02:06 PM
3

Conor Oberst, well done for suing this disgusting pig. Please put proceeds to helping other victims of false rape accusation, and importantly support Community Of The Wrongly Accused by Pierce Harlan.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 12:33 PM
0

He's already done more than most of us.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 12:33 PM
2

Typically boys like to be boys, and girls like to be girls. That's not to say a boy or girl should be ostracized for choosing a non-typical toy. However, if we start insisting all toys be gender neutral toys, then we end up like the gender ideologues - "gender is just a social construct".
/r/MensRights14/07/14 07:19 AM
1

Amen.
/r/MensRights13/07/14 04:56 PM
6

Feminism is an ideology born out of traditionalism due to changes in technology, and it stands in the way of my rights, and so I will combat it. Beautifully spoken Penn_Fatts. Your whole post is a very good introduction to new people, who somehow think feminists are good people. They are typically heteroandrophobic.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 10:06 AM
1

Some excellent resources there. Thanks lazernerd.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 02:55 AM
1

Excellent work Jonathan. Yvette Cooper, Harriet Harman, they are all very dangerous, and they absolutely hate normal healthy male heterosexuality. Something I coin "androheterophobia". I think the article in the comments is very good: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1090513812000025 It talks abouts sexual harassment and better explains what it really is. Our society is increasingly becoming like Saudi Arabia, where pretty soon, the only thing left will be to divide the sexes, e…
/r/MensRights11/07/14 02:46 AM
2

This is exactly why the MHRM is needed. Because our whole society cares nothing for men, it therefore means men can be presumed guilty until proven innocent, when it is very difficult to prove innocence. Can you imagine women being placed in a position where they would end up 20 years in prison based on the accusation of an angry ex-lover? This is crazy. And exactly why all the forces - social conservatism, religious fundamentalists, and above all feminazi are the major reasons behind zero care …
/r/MensRights11/07/14 02:36 AM
2

Shows how hard it is to take on the orthodoxy. I would love to read the study which shows "only 3% of rape cases result in conviction". I would say it is based on 90% of rape is not reported, which we do not know anyway. So even if 100% of accusations resulted in convictions, the conviction rate would still only be 10%.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 04:40 PM
2

Please, student from Oman, sue the council and sue the idiotic person who approached you. Sue the druckers.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 04:24 PM
9

You think Australia is bad? Just wait till you go to America or Canada. I would say many countries in Europe are worse than Australia, such as Scandinavia and France as a few examples.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 04:22 PM
3

Totally agree with most of the sentiment in this article. And people like Hetty Johnston and her androphobia can go and get lost, please leave Australia and go live in the ocean so you can stop stereotyping all men and creating androheterophobic laws. Go to the ocean Hetty Johnston.
/r/MensRights05/07/14 04:20 PM
5

Sounds like you are closer to defining a mangina rather than a white knight. However with the evolution of our lexicon, and mangina not being liked and considered "not proper" enough, it appears the definition of white knight is now closer to that of a mangina.
/r/MensRights04/07/14 04:33 AM
4

Magic +50
/r/MensRights03/07/14 04:00 PM
1

That's not my idea, that's your interpretation of my idea. My idea is a free for all. However that currently cannot exist, because the feminazi are in power. Anyhow, we're on the same sort of page here, and I agree that the option you suggest is the most workable option in the current climate.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 03:55 PM
1

No silly, I'm saying only men being portrayed negatively is unacceptable. There will always be negative characters in life, therefore cinema/tv should be able to portray them as well. But they need to reflect reality, not the feminist, women=good/competent, men=bad/stupid.
/r/MensRights03/07/14 07:28 AM
1

Exactly. But the point is, the current situation of the feminazi not allowing negative portrayals of women, and only negative portrayal of men, is completely unacceptable and sexist.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 10:55 AM
2

Beautifully spoken.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 05:30 PM
3

I'm in total agreement with Erin Pizzey, radical feminism is the evil empire. The Feminazi is the major ideological bigots we are fighting.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 05:29 PM
11

Absolutely spot on Pierce. In fact, you could probably open up any book from some of the feminist publishing houses and find incredibly misandric passages in pretty much every single book. I've done something similar in a feminist book shop; the amount of hatred for boys and men is beyond belief. I think to understand people such as Arthur, you need to understand the mentality of white knights and the agenda they have.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 05:23 PM
16

Hetty Johnston who has basically said "tough luck" to innocent men having their lives completely ruined and left to rot in jail, is a disgusting human being. She is basically like warmongers who say anyone against this war is a terrorist. She is the sort of person who would have brain monitors and anyone who thought even a socially undesirable thought would be sentenced to life in prison (only if that person was a man of course). There used to be some facebook page or similar along the lines of …
/r/MensRights30/06/14 05:16 PM
1

So effectively you are advocating for TV/Cinema which cannot have any negative roles, such as a bumbling or cowardly character. That just seems too totalitarian.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 05:09 PM
2

"I'm an anti-feminist, and I don't give a shit" - GWW. That's what I'm talking about. I must say, I am above all a civil libertarian above anything else, and that is why I oppose radical feminism, because it is a totalitarian ideology of hate. I absolutely agree with Erin Pizzey in the conference when she called it an evil empire. This misandric feminist ideology has permeated absolutely every aspect of our society. By freeing society from this misandric ideology, we will by default allow civil …
/r/MensRights30/06/14 05:05 PM
3

This is all completely insane. It just shows how rampant and ludicrous the false allegations have to be, for the word of a female to even be questioned. Absolute bs.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 05:02 PM
1

Notice how almost every single positive comment about the conference and rebutting the misandrists was deleted. Rawstory is a misandric feminazi piece of rubbish website, well done to poster for not linking to those clueless morons.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:30 AM
1

You seem unable to understand the flawed logic in your own comment. If we say certain people cannot be portrayed in a negative manner, and that is 50% of the population, it logically flows, that negative portrayals will only involve the other 50% of the population. Therefore your comment "It's not feasible to put this role on a woman character without considerable pushback...and that's not a bad thing at all for any gender. " means it is not possible to negatively portray anyone. By not having a…
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:16 AM
5

Wow, a mainstream media piece which actually presents the conference in a positive light.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:05 AM
3

Androphobia keeps on getting stronger and stronger.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 10:08 AM
2

Guywithaccount has very neatly exposed your flawed thinking fgn. What will become apparent the more you study gender outside the misandric patriarchy believing feminist ideology is that the patriarchy does not actually exist as it is claimed by feminism. The whole ideology of feminism only examines areas where women have been disadvantaged, while conveniently ignoring areas where women are advantaged. And worse, it mandates the use of totalitarianism to force those who don't agree with its conse…
/r/MensRights29/06/14 04:17 AM
12

I think the author hits the nail on the head. The feminist movement says a woman's body is her own, and therefore she has the right to choose - when it comes to abortion (when there is also a father and an unborn child), yet when it comes to sex work which harms no one, they say a woman does not have the right. The hypocrisy is insane. Please Canada fight these moral supremacists, and legalize sex work.
/r/MensRights29/06/14 03:27 AM
3

I think they are very good questions to ask. Pretty much all the 48 female privileges you list are true, and there would be much evidence to support it. I think fundamentally the problem with our modern gender ideology is that we examine all the positives there are in being male, and all the negatives there are in being female, and then present that as the narrative of reality. This is the narrative which is our modern day gospel. In this context, this explains exactly why it is so hard to stand…
/r/MensRights28/06/14 04:38 AM
1

I would like one too please :-)
/r/MensRights27/06/14 04:59 AM
1

I want to buy a fedora!
/r/MensRights27/06/14 04:57 AM
1

Right on AlphaWookie.
/r/MensRights24/06/14 09:48 AM
1

You are the person who made the original assertion, either do the research, take the time to show your results and add value. Otherwise please stop behaving in a juvenile manner.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 08:08 AM
1

To be fair the majority of research does not substantiate this. The best analysis seems to suggest that as a percentage of mens wages per hour a little less than 10% of wage disparity is not yet explained. This could definitely be gender discrimination. Your words, words you could not substantiate. And when asked, instead of responding civilly, you just got angry and started attacking me.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 03:27 AM
1

I'm not sure about that. Women having to dress modestly, not being allowed to be photographed as sexy in magazines, no strippers, etc. Actually sounds like Islam is a feminist paradise.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 05:09 AM
0

This is terrible news for Canada. A great country has gone down to the misandrist feminists. Soon men will all be exterminated, unless they bow their heads to the feminazi. Never bow your head to the feminazi, better to die than to bow your head to the feminazi. Keep fighting against these misandric laws, keep fighting the feminazi, keep fighting Canada.
/r/MensRights20/06/14 05:06 AM
1

Sadly, it is so-called normal people such as yourself who just spurt out conventional wisdom as if it is true, who do so much damage to our society and civil liberties. Sadly, I have even less time than yourself. In future, please substantiate what you say more thoroughly. "To be fair the majority of research does not substantiate this. The best analysis seems to suggest that as a percentage of mens wages per hour a little less than 10% of wage disparity is not yet explained. This could definite…
/r/MensRights19/06/14 01:17 PM
2

Not sure where you are getting your figures from, source it please.
/r/MensRights19/06/14 04:04 AM
1

Imagine if every boy did what DonutsAreCool96 is considering doing? It would get the draft right in the national spotlight.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 04:39 AM
1

It appears patent, that the Men's Human Rights Movement is the only movement which cares enough about men, to realize that the price of war is too high. In the world, in past and present, if it were all women who were sent to die and be cannon fodder, it is very likely the price of war would be considered too high.
/r/MensRights15/06/14 04:31 AM
2

Mens Rights is most closely aligned with civil liberties and freedom for people, and they are neither left or right politically. With the left they try to assert a marxist style socialism conservatism, whereas the right tries to assert a traditional style of conservatism. The MHRM is the opposite of conservative.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 06:38 AM
1

Just a thought piece showing how pervasive the herbivore perspective on Japanese men has influenced our pop culture.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 06:36 AM
1

Mike Shinoda: The album title came from a piece I read about online. A Japanese writer proposed that Japanese culture might be in trouble because the young men were, as she put it, "sheep boys" or "herbivores." They sat and grazed, waiting for opportunity to come to them. They didn't go out and hunt for a girl, a job, whatever. We have been feeling the same about music; it's turned soft and safe. In making The Hunting Party, we were striking out to make something visceral and aggressive.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 05:09 AM
1

Once again sex trafficking stories made up, or grossly exaggerated to create moral panic to outlaw and interfere with the lives of consenting adults because feminists, religious nuts and conservatives disapprove.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 12:52 AM
1

A nicely researched post, once again if it is women/girls everybody cares. If it is men/boys nobody wants to no about it. So many sex trafficking myths, perpetuated by feminists, religious fundamentalists and social conservatives who have their own agenda.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 12:43 AM
2

And we are told that Saudi Arabia is a country where men have all the power and women have none. Well, it sounds like exactly the country those "everyday sexism" feminists would want. Single men banned from being in public spaces because they 'might' talk to a woman! Also it is a country where women are not allowed to show skin and where there are no half clothed women or nude women in magazines. Sounds like a feminist paradise!
/r/MensRights14/06/14 12:40 AM
1

Excellent article outlining the ways feminism uses issues such as DV for its on political agenda - namely to demonize men and create female victim hysteria to get more funding for their misandric programs and give more jobs to indoctrinated and clueless women's studies graduates.
/r/MensRights14/06/14 12:35 AM
1

Google works differently depending on your location my understanding is.
/r/MensRights13/06/14 05:13 AM
1

Hey Dude, What do you think would upset these nasty hateful feminists the most? If you become a dedicated and dutiful Men & Boy Rights researcher, opinion maker and activist. Just look at the amazing work Paul Elam has done. Just look at the amazing work fidelbogen has done. Just look at the amazing work Pierce Harlan has done. Maybe we cannot win, but we must try. Never surrender, never bow your head to these misandric monsters. Never surrender. #Keepfighting
/r/MensRights13/06/14 04:55 AM
1

Well done with the list!
/r/MensRights11/06/14 03:43 PM
1

Where is Dean's comment? The comments appear empty, as if there are no comments for the article.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 03:39 PM
1

Christina Hoff Summers discusses this in her book The War Against Boys.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:39 AM
3

This is exactly what one would expect from two of the biggest white knights in the world - Obama and Biden. What a stupid message which simply reinforces androphobia. With this sort of feminist propaganda rubbish no wonder there is zero compassion for men in our society. It completely ignores males as victims, and females as perpetrators. Imagine if this video was played out in public and before all movies and the message was prominent black people telling other black people not to steal - that …
/r/MensRights10/06/14 06:30 AM
1

As Dr Greg Canning put it, Elizabeth Broderick is the commissioner for sex discrimination against men. In that, that is what she actually does, she is a sexist bigot.
/r/MensRights10/06/14 06:11 AM
6

Pretty cool Dean, bravo. A couple of pointers, we need to bring up that it is BOTH women AND men judges who are bias against men. We saw this play out a long time ago, when juries had to include women, because male jurors were too "chivalrous" to convict women. Also, that when men/boys do anything we blame them, when women/girls do anything we blame society. That was a key, after the female host started blaming men for all their ills - imagine if it were women who were 80% of suicides - we'd be …
/r/MensRights09/06/14 04:53 PM
5

Beautifully spoken Tracy. That's exactly what I am after - the truth. And also liberty, may I add. And that is why I love Men's Rights. It speaks the truth, even when the truth makes some people uncomfortable.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 12:59 AM
3

Again, these misandrists/conservatives and religious fundamentalists doing what they do best. Criminalizing men for nothing. This is horrendous, Canada has now gone down to the feminists.
/r/MensRights08/06/14 06:45 AM
1

Yep, just need to put that style of examining and thinking about ways to analyze and interpret things in my own work and I'd be good as gold.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 06:56 AM
2

Thanks again dejour, yes it is the classic linear model.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 06:53 AM
1

Very nice analysis of the journal article, thank you dejour, thank you very much.
/r/MensRights03/06/14 06:50 AM
5

Thanks very much for highlighting interesting aspects from the paper regarding Hostility Towards Men and Hostility Towards Women. Perhaps what the study needed to also do was measure Men's Hostility Towards other Men and Women's Hostility Towards other Women.
/r/MensRights02/06/14 02:33 AM
2

Yet another one of these feminazi trying to pretend they were a "victim of abuse" so they can then try and campaign their feminist agenda. Good work to the investigators and journalists for exposing her lies.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 03:14 AM
0

Incredible isn't it? Once again the MSM trivializes the death of men.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 03:00 AM
2

Brilliant, thanks for the research. Due to the gender bias in the whole police and legal process, from investigating, charging, bargaining and the trial, jury etc. It would appear the chances of a female being wrongly imprisoned compared to a man would be very, very, very tiny. There's probably around 1000 innocent convicted men compared to 1 innocent convicted woman. And then we are told we live in a gender equal society, or more commonly, a society where women are systematically discriminated …
/r/MensRights01/06/14 02:45 AM
2

These gender ideologues and misandrists have caused the conference a massive security requirement, and yet the mainstream media does not even comment or write on the story. These people are the real terrorists, however that does not fit in with the current gender ideology which permeates our society, so no one questions them. This gender ideology is our modern day medieval religion, and anyone who dares question it is threatened with violence. A well written letter Jonathan.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 02:34 AM
4

Very good video HunterGuilherme.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 02:16 AM
1

Well done. Everyone talks about how women & girls are discriminated against, yet no one points out the bloody obvious. That we live in a highly androphobic society which thinks it is okay to stereotype all men as potential paedophiles and rapists and thieves and trouble makers. Then we are told we live in a society which actively discriminates against women - good grief.
/r/MensRights01/06/14 02:14 AM
3

Dude, this sort of nonsense contributes to moral panic and allows these misandrists to grossly exaggerate these issues, to create laws which discriminate against men & boys. The people creating these stories are typically androheterophobic radical misandric feminists.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 11:53 AM
1

Thanks to bebopper76, this shows how systematic these falsehoods are, people and celebs making up stories to continue with their androheterophobic agenda.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 11:50 AM
2

Notice how the comments for this Boston Globe article (which are largely supportive of the article's sentiment) contrast with those of the Time article. Any reason for this? Does the Boston Globe censor comments?
/r/MensRights30/05/14 11:48 AM
2

This article in Time Magazine is the usual hit-piece, it attacks the MRM without realizing those exact same criticisms, except with added vigor and actual logic and facts could be applied to feminism. A completely baseless article which is good for a laugh and good for pointing out in presentations.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 07:54 AM
4

Best of luck with it. Godspeed.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:10 PM
2

Brydie Lee-Kennedy showing her misandrist mindset. How many of these toxic men and women dominate the MSM. These "creeps" like Brydie are everywhere.
/r/MensRights28/05/14 12:06 PM
5

What a white knight douche!
/r/MensRights27/05/14 12:48 PM
1

Yep, you've just proved you are a male. That means imprisonment for the slightest offence, and nobody except your family will care. Of course if you were a female, you would be praised "you go girl" and would not even be charged.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 02:46 AM
1

Upvote for your mature response. As I've said before, the people of Iceland are typically cool, just their laws which are formed by radical feminist ideology are misandric.
/r/MensRights26/05/14 11:48 AM
0

Unfortunately this feminist movement is rather dwarfed by the misandric radical feminists who dominate the discourse in universities and public policy and therefore allowed these incredibly hateful laws to get passed in the first place. These feminists are also calling for these hateful laws to be enacted throughout Europe and the rest of the world.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 07:56 AM
2

Feminism is the reason why this is an issue in the first place with their misandric "Swedish Model", which can only be described as androheterophobic to the max. Gotta love Maggie McNeil and Bebopper76 for their brilliant and insightful analysis.
/r/MensRights25/05/14 07:53 AM
1

Imagine if a female politician was labeled and reported by mainstream media as a creepy, sleazebag misandrist for winking. Oh no, it would not happen. This is about pointing out how endemic the misandric feminist perspective is in our society. I cannot help but feel your comments may be biased by your previous protestations about how Iceland is a great country despite its Islamic style laws regarding nudity and sex work, which ironically are not through religion, but through misandric heteroandr…
/r/MensRights22/05/14 05:50 PM
1

That depends on your perspective. If you hate boys & men, or if you are simply a chivalrous white knight who believes women & girls must always be believed and men & boys must come last, and their happiness does not matter, and their usefulness is in what they can provide to women & girls and society, then actually you would be a big supporter of feminism. And would actually perceive it to be highly good.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 05:44 PM
0

Dear LordFlick, as the good David Byron has pointed out, you sir, are most definitely naive. I think you will find that modern feminism is effectively radical feminism. Radical feminism is misandrism and androheterophobia disguised as "equality". Please take the time to read further and learn.
/r/MensRights22/05/14 05:41 PM
1

Good link, thank you.
/r/MensRights21/05/14 03:53 AM
1

What you will find is it is not so much intelligence par se and much less education. Rather it is a willingness to be open-minded and question conventional wisdom. You can bet your girlfriend would be religious during the middle ages and not question it, and also would likely have agreed that Jewish people were a cause of many German problems in the 1930's without questioning it. Intelligence matters, however perhaps your girlfriend is just educated, and that does not really create intelligence …
/r/MensRights21/05/14 03:39 AM
2

I would also second anyone with video equipment and a film maker to make some ads which point out men getting abused as being funny and men looking like idiots and flipping the genders. Gynocentrism is the world we live in unfortunately.
/r/MensRights20/05/14 03:13 AM
1

good information there unbannable.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 07:55 AM
1

| but I can assure you that it's not in a feminist's agenda to beat men. Look at all the laws being passed in countries like Sweden, Norway, France. An assurance from a person versus an analysis of the laws the heteroandrophobic laws the feminists are responsible for. Once again, my good sir, you are completely ignorant. I only hope you take the time to investigate these issues outside the misandric feminist zeitgeist.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 07:54 AM
5

One word, androphobia.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 07:43 AM
1

Perhaps it is the less nuanced approach which makes it more accessible and makes people show others who have more limited attention spans on these issues. Either way, congratulations, and I hope I can make it to Detroit.
/r/MensRights19/05/14 07:41 AM
3

I actually think this person is genuine. However by labelling oneself as a feminist one aligns themselves with a movement which overemphasises female issues and trivializes male issues. But that is not the worst aspect of feminism, the worst aspect is the totalitarian nature of feminism and its aim and goals at introducing all sorts of androheterophobic laws.
/r/MensRights18/05/14 12:31 PM
5

Oh, good sir, it most indeed is a men & boys human rights movement issue and problem. Very few give a stuff about men and boys in this world, we at the men & boys human rights movement most certainly do. The problem stems from a few things, such as segregation of the sexes and the repressed sexuality in these highly sexually taboo countries. I could go on, but to simply label it as "Patriarchy" is wrong. Yet again, another ignorant patriarchy believer...
/r/MensRights18/05/14 11:54 AM
1

It was incredible, but it is what we have come to expect. Gynocentrism is at the heart of pretty much all media on these issues. Good on you Pigman for bringing this up, and quite bizarre how it received very few upvotes - I guess because people did not see the doco.
/r/MensRights15/05/14 05:44 AM
3

Hats off to some journalists for actually pointing out how the western media only cares if something happens to girls or women. Boys are routinely raped and killed, yet nobody cares much. It happens to a woman, and all of a sudden there is international outrage. Girls get kidnapped, international outrage right from the top - the Obama family. Shows that we care most about girls, then women, then a fair way behind boys, then men as guttertrash at the bottom. And then we are taught and all believe…
/r/MensRights13/05/14 02:40 AM
3

Yep, saw that, it was unbelievable. Also during the doco they blamed the abuse of boys on gender inequality.
/r/MensRights13/05/14 02:32 AM
-2

Actually just noticed that. Yeah, it is difficult to consider a more androheterophobic misandrist gynocentric bigot as Hiliary Clinton.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 03:55 PM
1

Comic gold.
/r/MensRights11/05/14 03:53 PM
13

This is a perfect example of how our society cares highly about girls, then women, then a fair way back boys, then the people treated like guttertrash - men. And then we are told men are privileged. Hilarious. Good block actually pointing out the discrimination the media has, boys get murdered, throats slit, nobody cares, girls get kidnapped, massive protests. Unbelievable. Why even pretend there's gender equality; even worse we pretend it is men & boys who are privileged.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 06:42 AM
2

Very interesting article which discusses female circumcision from a medical perspective; very similar to male circumcision in regards to some of the issues discussed such as phimosis.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 06:32 AM
-1

Yes, we all know about Godwin's Law. When you are talking extreme ideologies - like radical feminism, it is only natural to compare them to other extreme ideologies such as nazism. To hell with Godwin's Law.
/r/MensRights10/05/14 04:56 AM
3

Beautifully spoken Jonathan.
/r/MensRights06/05/14 05:25 PM
1

Was actually a very good article I felt. I do not doubt her claims, however there is an element in there which suggests she believes males are "privileged".
/r/MensRights01/05/14 03:54 PM
3

Yes, Do it! Do it!
/r/MensRights01/05/14 03:42 PM
2

I agree, she should be charged. Violence by proxy should not be allowed to continue any more. And shame on the white-knight father for doing the killing.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 02:13 AM
3

You are an inspiration and a legend Pierce. I will support you whatever you decide, I do however implore you to continue your amazing work.
/r/MensRights19/04/14 08:08 AM
3

The real conservatives are feminists, who as GWW has discussed is like representing traditional conservative values and amping them up. Look at the way they demonize male sexuality and hate it how women do modelling and like dressing up. It is the radical feminists who are actually the conservatives; that is why they team up with the religious fundamentalists to outlaw things like strip clubs.
/r/MensRights16/04/14 02:38 PM
1

Sounds bad.
/r/MensRights11/04/14 05:53 AM
3

Just point out that feminism is about hating men & boys. And that she has verified that in her bigoted comment.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 01:47 AM
1

I'm sure just as many statistics could be produced about female circumcision. There was a study showing it reduced STIs too. We could then also say female circumcision is just like getting vaccinated. And that female circumcision saves billions of dollars too. What a silly article.
/r/MensRights08/04/14 01:44 AM
10

I actually think your story is rather inspirational, throughout this immense distress, you managed to keep up academic performance, that's some great skills right there. Well done, thank you for sharing your experience. If I'm around your area, look me up, and I'll come over for a beer to discuss gender politics, and the ideologues who aim to disable boys & men with their hateful bigotry.
/r/MensRights07/04/14 03:17 PM
8

Love it how it uses "masculine-infantile" to try to portray masculinity as infantile. A complete and utter sexist book, please give us the title and author and page number sputnikv.
/r/MensRights01/04/14 06:18 AM
3

Do they remove all the best pro-MRA comments there or something? Just the usual feminist worried about the MHRM, and labeling it "garbage" and blaming all of the issues that men & boys face on "The Patriarchy"TM.
/r/MensRights29/03/14 12:49 AM
1

Thanks for the comment and also for your excellent and thought provoking blog.
/r/MensRights20/03/14 12:55 AM
2

What has been the latest on Norway reversing their adoption of the infamous and misandrist and heteroandrophobic Swedish Model? Any chance of this happening soon?
/r/MensRights14/03/14 02:59 PM
21

I'd say brigading. I would also think they are not only attacking Warren Farrell but other great authors of the genre. Indeed, I'm surprised the feminazi have not done this eariler.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 02:57 PM
1

White Ribbon has to be one of the most misandric organizations on Earth. They are another cog in the feminazi. Good work for doing the research and identifying the misandric people behind this campaign.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 05:29 AM
2

Finally an article in the MSM talking about the cultural misandry (he even uses the word misandrous) so prevalent on our TVs. Hooray, somebody states the obvious.
/r/MensRights14/03/14 12:17 AM
1

Read it now. I enjoyed it, thanks for your perspectives and collating all the information together. If these femitheist do succeed, perhaps that will be of benefit to the planet. The femitheist will kill off virtually all men & boys, and kill off all the women & girls who don't believe in misandric feminism. Then only a small population will be on Earth, and they will be able to use the existing male technology built upon male intellect and male brilliance to survive human beings for many years …
/r/MensRights11/03/14 09:24 AM
2

What a sexist piece of shit campaign. How about "Real People don't buy children".
/r/MensRights11/03/14 07:51 AM
5

Don't you love it how these feminists are so androheterophobic. They continue the conservative and traditional viewpoint of having men approach women, and then when they do so, unless they look like Brad Pitt they are douchebags. Anything which benefits women (even when it involves discrimination against men) is viewed as "not harmful".
/r/MensRights11/03/14 07:47 AM
1

Good links there sarcast - it shows Barbara Kay is actually a social conservative, and not an MRA. Barbara Kay, based on those two articles above is arguably is part of the feminazi.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 05:32 AM
1

Okay, I'm going to read your whole article.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 02:53 PM
5

The ironic thing about r/badhistory is it actually falsifies history to create its own history with the narrative to keep the misandrists happy.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 02:48 PM
2

This is a really major issue I absolutely agree. There are few groups which work at stopping this hideous reality. However, the MHRM is one such group, it is the only group in the world which cares enough about men. Rape culture IS NOT what the feminazi say it is. It is the brutal anal rape of men in prison, the worst kind of rape. These people are placed in a dangerous situation, and have one of the worst crimes perpetrated against them. Not some regretful sex, but brutal forced. Be part of the…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 02:49 AM
1

What a clueless idiot!
/r/MensRights08/03/14 11:25 PM
-2

I agree. However, is there a word which means mangina that we can use? I'm working on one.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 11:36 PM
1

Truth.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 03:18 PM
1

AlphaWookie is spot on. This is one of the most important areas in mens&boys human rights. We need to look into ways to reduce government interference in the private lives of people, and this hysteria is a way the government can demonize all heterosexual boys and men, and then use that as a basis for creating androphobic laws. Just look at the home of misandry, Sweden.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 07:48 AM
1

I think it is incredible the original openly misandric guidelines, and who placed them there in the first place.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 03:16 AM
3

A good article telling us how men were sent off to die, while feminists campaigned for the vote for rich white women, but of course not for the obligation that vote would entail (in America the motto was one man, one gun, one vote). This is an article which definitely needs to be reposted and spread on ANZAC day and Rememberance Day.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 12:29 AM
1

Some amazing WWI posters.
/r/MensRights04/03/14 12:23 AM
2

One of the most seminal works. Read it in 2010, and was aware of a lot of it. But what brought me on board the MHRM big time, was that the people criticizing it, and trying to debunk it (feminists) just outright lied and made up statistics. Then I dug deeper, and realized the proof about what I already suspected was true was now out there. Feminism makes up lies and false statistics and is a movement of hatred.
/r/MensRights03/03/14 11:33 PM
1

Tell them that regarding childless people under 30, then it is women who earn MORE THAN men! Then point out the bake sale should have men paying 0.75 and women paying 1.00. Here is a link to the article: http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2014/02/24/childless-women-in-their-twenties-out-earn-men-so/ Just do a search for gender wage gap myth in google. In fact, what you should do is print off a flyer explaining reasons for the gender wage gap (experience, hours worked, job danger, 94% of men as…
/r/MensRights03/03/14 11:28 PM
2

Generally a really good article pointing out the innate differences between male and female brains. As with the great Harald Eia documentary, it points out how lesbian women and gay men have complimentary sex brains to a degree. Lesbians are better spatially, gays are better verbally. Larry Summers is identified too. These discussions are also in Steve Pinker's book, and also that by Roy F. Baumeister.
/r/MensRights02/03/14 02:20 AM
1

We are talking about a type of feminism. One that is commonly known as radical feminism, a type which is now effectively mainstream feminism. You just come up with the usual NAFALT argument that we are so familiar with here at the MHRM. The fact is mainstream feminists organizations such as NOW routinely push for anti-male laws, such as opposing joint custody of children.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 08:17 AM
2

Nice list of real-world feminists and the misandric policies they have enacted.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 11:34 PM
3

Has that passed law now in France. It was thanks to that idiotic minister for women and equality, more like minister for discrimination and hatred of men and boys.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 11:15 PM
1

Usual feminist perspective of viewing men as evil penis wielding oppressors when it comes to sex work.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 11:14 PM
1

It is becoming apparent you are a troll, however I will give you the benefit of the doubt. It would be very easy for me to link you to many places. However, I do not think that will make you understand. Please, do some research on this yourself, otherwise you will not appreciate and understand the nature of misandric feminism. Start with looking at what has happened in Scandinavia and what has lead to the criminalization of men there. Cheers.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 11:07 PM
4

Gieger, I have seen your posts, and believe you are a genuine MHRA. However, judging by the people and what has been posted, this appears to be a downvote/upvote brigade. Remember, these are the same people who invented the superbowl trafficking myths, the olympics trafficking myths, and grossly exaggerate trafficking of women, to further their misandrist agenda.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 12:26 PM
1

Yes, you appear to be correct EatsTinyBaldBabies, the feminazi and misandrists have come here and organized a downvote/upvote brigade. Here at the MHRM, we are a civil rights group, and hence we are supportive of sex workers, equally we are also against any person working in the sex industry against their will. Hence, we view openness and legalization and full decriminalization for both sex workers and clients as the most appropriate solution. Not prohibition, and driving everything underground,…
/r/MensRights26/02/14 12:13 PM
2

The only people pushing for the criminalization of the sex industry are feminists and religious fundamentalists. Are you really that ignorant? How do you think sex work became illegal in Sweden and Norway? Aliens? Over there it had nothing to do with religion, and everything to do with feminism and male-bashing. Look at who is pushing for criminalization in Israel, France, Germany, Holland, Canada, Australia, everywhere - answer - man-hating feminists who believe women have no agency and only me…
/r/MensRights26/02/14 12:08 PM
0

Unless we get the proper methodology of the study we cannot know. I mean, a woman would possibly expect to have a door opened for her, for a man this would be less likely. You can just tell by the way this person has written the piece that she is part of the feminazi. As such, these people are bigots, and are not interested in the truth, just furthering their own hateful ideology.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 02:20 AM
5

The issue xNOM was pointing out is that legitimate issues of trafficking are conflated with the goals of misandrist feminism. The feminists say the trafficking of women for sex is a massive problem and that all sex workers are victims, and yes there are cases, but the feminists massively overstate and exaggerate this is many cases to further their agenda of criminalizing the sex industry.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 01:09 AM
1

Unfortunately this problem, of gynophillia and gynocentricism appears likely to continue. Basically, until the gender empathy gap is addressed then people will always by far feel sympathetic to women and not to men. With this in mind, people know they will generally be able to raise a lot more money for women than for men. To address the gender empathy gap we can begin by pointing out the implicit sexism in these emails. We can also begin by correcting the false feminist narrative that all of so…
/r/MensRights25/02/14 04:28 AM
1

I based the conclusion on the opinions of my friends who saw the movie. Watching the trailer was speculative, and based on that speculation I decided against watching the movie. The trailer showed slapstick violence against men, the woman appearing smart and clever, and the men appearing like buffoons. Not rocket science to consider the movie is probably going to be like the trailer.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 02:28 AM
1

That's the sort of thing I would expect with Sweden. The problem is not so much that Sweden does not recognize that fathers can and do change babys, it is more that Sweden expects men to become women, and does not recognize the innate differences between the sexes.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 02:23 AM
0

The issue here is the gendered violence against men, and the double standards. I saw the advertisements for Frozen, and I could just tell it was the usual Hollywood misandric, women are wonderful, men are buffoons usual rubbish. 95% of the stuff which comes from Hollywood is feminazi approved shit.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 02:09 AM
4

Good on her.
/r/MensRights23/02/14 07:29 AM
1

Good logical point there!
/r/MensRights23/02/14 07:22 AM
4

The real piece of literature which pointed to all these issues including NOW and the false rape culture as perpetuated by gender ideologues was the incredibly brilliant book in 1993. Warren Farrell "The Myth of Male Power".
/r/MensRights23/02/14 07:20 AM
2

I was merely pointing out the different standards compared to the male and female competition. The topic was on the winter olympics and there was a male athlete killed BECAUSE the course was harder for men. The key thing here is someone was killed and that is worthy of bringing to attention. "proves a problem is lazy and anecdotal" - nice strawman argument, I was not claiming to prove anything.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 11:23 PM
1

That's perfectly okay for people such as yourself and others to have that view. The problem is when such people impose their morals and authoritarian power over others.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 06:56 AM
1

A Georgian Athlete was KILLED at Vancouver 2010 Winter Olympics, because the mens luge course was difficult due to the starting position compared to much much easier and safer starting position for women. So what are we saying here? Make it only dangerous for men but not for women? I must say, that is one of the things I have appreciated about these winter games - men & women on the same course. Because there are so many male competitors and men trying out for most of the sports compared to wome…
/r/MensRights22/02/14 12:45 AM
2

Mike B is an awesome person for taking on the might and evil and hatred of these misandrist feminists such as Julie Bindel.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 12:30 AM
1

No surprise here. Conservatives and feminists trumping up fake statistics of sex trafficking to further their totalitarian agenda.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 08:07 AM
1

Yep, basically conservatism and feminism are the problems. Both coincidentally are very authoritarianism. That's why I love the M&BHRM - it is fundamentally a movement for liberty and equality.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 08:03 AM
1

This is not a committee which is about gender equality, rather it is a committee designed and based on misandrist feminism to criminalize heterosexual males. All these major organizations such as the EU and UN have been absolutely infested with sex work hating and misandrist feminists.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 02:37 AM
3

What caused sex work to become illegal? Answer: Feminism and Religious Fundamentalists. The same reason that caused alcohol to become illegal in America. These are ideologies which are totalitarian and authoritarian and oppressive. And as a libertarian is just one of the many reasons why I oppose feminism.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 02:26 AM
1

Well done jseeley for producing that.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 02:03 AM
40

NOW - this is feminism. Wow, just wow. Someone dares speak the truth, and look what happens. Notice how NOW uses more feminist dubious statistics "one in four women will be sexually assaulted on campus" and the usual false narrative "rape culture". All these people who say feminism is not the problem from Boys&Men basic human rights need to see this. Feminism IS THE PROBLEM.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 07:01 AM
1

Nice strawman comment. Appears you something of a troll or perhaps just ignorant.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 04:33 PM
2

If you want a list of the issues then I recommend the following, written by the greatest writer. http://kyle.thedamnedoldeman.com/?p=6
/r/MensRights18/02/14 04:29 PM
2

It's pretty sad if you actually believe that "gender is a social construct". Unfortunately many ignorant people do.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 03:15 PM
1

Very interesting and very good article about evolutionary biology. I'm sure the "gender is a social construct" liars will be outraged at this!
/r/MensRights18/02/14 12:17 AM
2

The feminazi will be loving this nonsense.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 03:50 AM
2

I guess next time she wants some emotional support you could either say "Didn't you tell me to man up" or "Woman up".
/r/MensRights16/02/14 05:57 PM
1

The usual modus operandi of feminists. Demonize male heterosexuality, demonize men. Then enact laws against heterosexual males, and then carry on self-righteously how you are protecting innocent angels from these disgusting heterosexual beasts. Well done again Jonathan.
/r/MensRights14/02/14 06:06 AM
1

I understand your point of view too sillymod, however I certainly do not agree with the principles of censorship over an issue like this. Thanks for your suggestion of raising this issue with the subreddit for a discussion on it.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 08:18 AM
3

I tried to keep it factual. And no, sticking to the facts should not create drama. The issue was boys being treated inhumanely, because they are not girls. Mentioning the countries was just the point - even with all the massive spotlight on this region, we still overlook the treatment of innocent boys. Hopefully investigative journalism shown here will help. Personally I do not like having to avoid naming certain things, just to avoid upsetting people who may be sensitive. People deserve the tru…
/r/MensRights11/02/14 03:08 PM
4

Remember if you simply link to content, people are free to pick up on whatever they like. Now, it would be great if people focussed on the MR issue, but they don't always. There's one hell of a lot of trolling in here, one ought to remember. That was already done; I added an OP post for the link as soon as I created the topic, to highlight I was pointing out the way boys are treated, and girls would not be treated that way.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 11:57 AM
1

Thanks for your explanation, however I disagree. The argument you make could easily be put about any news article which has a boy punished at school. The link I provided includes a 50 minute video, you clearly did not watch this. I think the whole topic of what or what cannot be included is worthy of conversation for the subreddit. If I were new to this subreddit, then I think, yes, what you say could be considered fair enough. However, I have been here for a while and have contributed, and am h…
/r/MensRights11/02/14 02:10 AM
1

Hey Sillymod. I think that is definitely debatable, as far as I am aware it was only boys, some as young as five who were targeted here. This imprisonment was only for boys. There is no similar girls prison. If we were to use your criteria as what can or cannot go in this subreddit, then arguably more than half the links up here would be censored. I appreciate the effort required in moderating such a controversial subreddit and the work you do. However I do ask you to please give me a either a f…
/r/MensRights10/02/14 04:06 PM
1

I think Matt has definite merit in his points here team. The way our society works, if women/girls as a whole are doing badly - it is discrimination. If men/boys as a whole are doing badly - it is their own fault, and they need to man up. (Except for genital mutilation as Matt has pointed out). That's unfortunately how our society thinks - they cannot handle the truth. The other topics Matt points out however, show specific examples where feminism and the legal fraternity have teamed up to legal…
/r/MensRights10/02/14 03:10 PM
1

I understand your concerns Matt, however the general public is very green on these matters, and therefore need to be introduced to the basics of the MHRM. I think all the topics you bring up would be perfect for a "How Feminism legally creates discrimination" lecture.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 03:07 PM
2

What do you think was the best way to answer it? Because part of that question boils down to the NAFALT argument. Feminism is representative as a whole for a totalitarian movement, therefore to say you still call yourself a feminist, but you are against totalitarianism relates to the NAFALT argument. Also, it is incredibly difficult to answer a question perfectly and precisely on the spot. I think Karen will only be better for the experience. Brilliant stuff by Karen, on the whole.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 03:04 PM
2

Nicely spoken YAC.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 02:52 PM
2

The video report shows boys even as young as five, being taken away. It talks about how these young boys are imprisoned in outdoor cages. Can you imagine if this was girls? Everyone around the world would be talking about gendered violence and misogyny everywhere. It seems even boys - because they are male - have no sympathy in this world. Less than even old women at the end of their lives.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 11:07 AM
1

A very good critique. Almost worth buying this book by Wendy McElroy.
/r/MensRights10/02/14 05:38 AM
8

Here is my complaint. Also, NOTE: The long version of this advertisement is even more misandric than this version. It has the man being given a look of disdain by the woman in that version. Here is my complaint to the advertising standards in Australia, feel free to use parts of it to complain to Nivea. http://www.adstandards.com.au/process/theprocesssteps/initiatingacomplaint CONTENT OF ADVERTISEMENT: The Advertisement depicts two products, one being Nivea Stress Protection FOR WOMEN, the other…
/r/MensRights08/02/14 02:04 PM
1

How do you have to prove you are over 18 Sasha?
/r/MensRights08/02/14 12:31 PM
1

That's the way these misandrists are trying getting around the issue that the information which proves categorically that feminism is a hate movement is out there. Is there something we can do to lobby a group to get something done. Certainly the legendary Mike from j4mb is aware of this no doubt.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 12:29 PM
3

True, however it also connects members of the androheterophobic misandrist community together. And they like to conflate "protecting women" "violence against women" "child sex" with their own anti-sex agendas. These types of people are usually radical feminists or religious fundamentalists. Funny how feminists work together with people who they despise (religious people) whenever it suits their need. Then they try and concoct all their anti-sex advocacy "research". I'm currently reading Christin…
/r/MensRights06/02/14 07:45 AM
1

Love you Jonathan.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 12:56 AM
9

Wow, what a misandric case that is. On that logic, the Lulu app creators should be jailed for 20 years. I guess there is a few apps out there trying to mimic Lulu such as Chicklopedia and Playbook. But yeah, pretty scary stuff.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 12:41 AM
4

"He pointed out that the old code of the streets, that thieves don't hurt women and children, is no longer honored." So what does that say? Women and children have protected status, but not men, because men's lives are worth nothing, they are the disposable sex that nobody cares about.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 06:51 AM
3

This is hilarious. Feminists everywhere realizing that their time of misandry only has a couple more decades remaining.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 04:54 AM
2

Are people finally starting to see the light? Still this myth about gender wage gap which refuses to die will still be around as long as the feminazi maintain control of the dialogue on gender.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 12:30 AM
1

That's the name of the theory. I didn't come up with the name, Adam Kostakis did. Do yourself a favour and read the theory, it's compelling reading if you are interested in gender equality.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 12:06 AM
1

Have you written your manuscript? Why not publish it online? Gynocentrism as a theory has been published online by Adam Kostakis. If you have these unique insights just get out there and put your name to it online like Adam Kostakis has done. Otherwise it will be unfulfilled. Much better to get your work out there, and build from there, then worry about these politically correct idiotic publishers. Do it!
/r/MensRights03/02/14 11:49 AM
1

Great stuff Fewtse375. Good luck with the book. Yes, feminism is a highly evil ideology which actively opposes basic human rights for boys and men. That's why I oppose feminism.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 11:42 AM
2

That's pretty much correct. Most religions and feminism go hand in hand with demonizing human sexuality - particularly male sexuality.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 05:32 AM
1

How is fighting for civil liberties consistent with taking the right away from women to choose which occupation they wish to work or what adults do in their private time. It's not consistent with civil liberties at all.
/r/MensRights03/02/14 05:30 AM
1

Wrong. Look up which groups banned sex work in the first place in America. They were Christian and feminist groups in the 1920s.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 03:57 PM
1

This is truly insane, if anyone needs a better example of sentencing discrimination and misandry this is the case. A woman does the killing yet receives no jail time, yet the man who does no killing is sentenced to jail for more than a year. Insane.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 01:58 AM
1

Yes, a very good critique of feminism.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 03:23 AM
1

Is Ally Fogg finally getting more of a clue? It certainly seems that way. Long live the M&BHRM. A movement against Misandrist Feminist Totalitarianism.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 03:20 AM
4

I am very much for gender equality and treating men and women equally and giving them equal opportunity. What I am against is the heteroandrophobic nature of mainstream feminism. Basically radical feminism (which is almost pure misandry) ideology is the mainstream feminism. Also the consistent feminists lies and how feminists like to conflate an evil misandric ideology (feminism) with women (human beings based on their sex).
/r/MensRights01/02/14 03:11 AM
2

Good on them for calling out the lies of heteroandrophobic feminists and their white knight allies.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 03:08 AM
3

What a silly comment. Sounds like the sort of comment an indoctrinated Arts graduate would write; trying to conflate things with each other to justify the argument.
/r/MensRights01/02/14 02:56 AM
2

Jonathon Taylor once again comes up with a detailed analysis. Hats off Jonathon.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 08:00 AM
2

Finally a sensible article focusing on the point we in the MBHRM often bring up. Male hyperagency and female hypoagency. We push for gender equality and equity not the current female hypoagency nonsense that misandrist feminists are so fond of.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 07:51 AM
1

"Yes, let's teach children about enthusiastic consent". Although overall the article by Ally is decent, the above quote seems to suggest he is in the pocket of misandrist feminists.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 01:09 AM
2

You really are an ignorant and indoctrinated person. Oh dear. Unfortunately many people think the ignorant way that you do.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 12:52 AM
2

"The controversy erupted as France's parliament approved a sweeping gender equality law, whose measures include extending paternity leave in France to six months, increasing fines for failure to reach parity in politics and business and banning "mini-Miss" beauty pageants for under 13-year-olds. " The Totalitarian Feminazi is coming to the fore. As I've said many times before, things are going to get a whole lot worse, before the general populace realize that feminism is a totalitarian misandris…
/r/MensRights30/01/14 02:12 AM
2

I really need to look into this study in more detail. What are its definitions of performing better than expected, etc. It seems they are trying to use statistical sleight of hand to explain gender differences as "The Patriarchy"TM.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 01:16 AM
1

The feminazi has for years been trying to push misandrist feminist indoctrination of boys as young as possible. And it looks like they are succeeding.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 01:12 AM
12

I think it's fine to be angry. As we have seen, being polite and asking for a seat at the table to raise concerns pretty much has got us nowhere. So being angry is fine in my book. I do not share the optimism of the OP in regards to the changes. I pray and hope that I am wrong, however all these feminazi/white knights still and will continue to occupy power for much time to come. Also, radfem ideology is still preached to many university graduates. These indoctrinated clueless arts SJWs will be …
/r/MensRights27/01/14 02:40 PM
2

Epic case dude. Glad you're still with us, and not being tortured in prison. But that's exactly what these sociopaths want.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 02:24 PM
3

And who benefits the most from having a playground where you can actually "play"? Boys!
/r/MensRights27/01/14 02:51 AM
1

Good to see Amnesty International realizes that buying and selling sex should be allowed for any free society, and we should not be held to fundamental religious dogma or radical feminist dogma. Notice how there is currently only one comment for the article? With the MSM we all know how they like to control their comments to fit with their editorial views.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 04:23 PM
4

Pretty good list of evidence regarding feminism as an activism being highly misandric, good links. Great stuff by anti-feminism, pro-equality.
/r/MensRights25/01/14 04:03 PM
1

Great stuff, and please keep it going for the future.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 03:06 PM
5

Hjernevask is a brilliant documentary. A must watch for any lover of science and the truth.
/r/MensRights23/01/14 03:04 PM
1

Wow plasmatorture, what an insane conversation. Good on you for sticking it out, and sticking with your feminazi friend.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 07:39 AM
1

Israel just keeps on getting a worse and worse Knesset it seems. First they have a heap of feminazi in there, now this.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 07:23 AM
1

Hollywood movies are by in large pieces of feminazi shit.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 07:17 AM
1

It was posted in 2011, but yeah I guess in these situations you never know whether youtube will remove it or not.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 07:07 AM
0

How hilarious was this article? What a beauty. Unfortunately these PIV-phobic feminists and self-gelded manginas are making big waves in terms of legal reforms.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 04:02 PM
1

There are scientific articles based on mitochondrial DNA, which show far more women than males reproduced (indicating men reproduced in multiple women). "Genetic evidence for unequal effective population sizes of human females and males" in the journal Molecular Biology and Evolution, 2004.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 03:49 PM
1

There was a study which showed if the victim was a white female the sentence would be considerably higher than if the victim was a white male, in vehicle accidents, even though in these cases the identity of the victim was random, and was not affected by the perpetrator of the accident. Just another example where men are simply not valued by society as much as women.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 03:43 PM
1

Michael Kimmel is the complete definition of Mangina. Now, can someone come up with a more non-offensive term for Mangina? Perhaps an indoctrinated, masculine-hating ideologue. He is like a male version of the misandrist feminist. Part of the Feminazi, yet he claims he is advocating for men's rights. Give me a break.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 03:35 PM
14

Just look at the headlines in the article to try to frame the comments as sexist, when they are simply stating reality: "Women who work in the City and have children are worth less than men, Nigel Farage has claimed as he addressed the issue of equal pay." Even when reporting on news the MSM cannot help but attempt to put a feminist spin on it.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 03:24 PM
1

Really good article there MasculistFeminist, thank you for taking the time to write it. No surprise a commenter went straight for the "what about the wimmenz" argument.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 03:20 PM
1

You should print the screen caps and post it.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 03:05 PM
5

The usual pedohysteria. One can imagine the response from the feminazi, moral puritans, social conservatives and religious fundamentalist. "You can't be too careful, the artificial leg is actually a real human being, so we were right to close down the entire swimming pool, and switch off the electricity, and shut down the country for the next week..."
/r/MensRights20/01/14 04:46 AM
8

"Between NAFALT and No True Scotsman, the term is stripped of all meaning" - so very true. But that is the logical fallacy these feminazi like to hide behind to avoid any legitimate criticism or questioning of their bigoted and hateful beliefs.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 04:43 AM
1

Human-stupidity once again shows itself to be amongst the greatest websites in the world. Human Stupidity happens when everyone goes along with whatever "conventional wisdom" there is, and doesn't stop to logically think.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 02:27 AM
2

Sorry dude, it's only equality if we take those ads and reverse the genders. That would mean a woman getting beaten up by a man when she does not buy the correct xmas present. This ad doesn't do anything to balance the misandry in advertisements.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 02:23 AM
1

Very good article pointing out that male sex workers are completely neglected. As usual the world is bowing its head to the home of misandry - Sweden.
/r/MensRights17/01/14 02:40 AM
3

Dude, the best way, is to ask innocent questions such as "Can you please define The Patriarchy". What elements of Patriarchy exist today? And then when she starts with all the BS about oppression of women, you can then ask, what about the men who were conscripted and sent to their deaths, and that most of them did not have the right to even vote in England during WWI. That the vote was brought about with the slogan "one man, one gun, one vote" - in that if the state was forcing men to fight for …
/r/MensRights17/01/14 02:34 AM
6

WTF? Is the MSM finally getting a sense of reality. Who is this Gregor Smith, does he have contacts in HuffPo. How did a mainstream dirtrag like HuffPo allow the truth to slip through their consistent articles filled with lies and false statistics? Amazing. Well done to Gregor Smith. Well written article.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 06:45 AM
7

Incredible, more of the usual labeling the MRM has a hate group when the real hate group is feminism.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 05:48 AM
2

You need to speak out about this. That is serious physical assault.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 05:52 AM
3

Spot on EvilPundit.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 05:46 AM
3

Unbelievable, but typical of our gynophilic society.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 01:59 AM
1

Just ridiculous article isn't it? Nice comment: Wow, I kind of feel sorry for you dude. As a man, your far more likely to be the victim of violence. You’ll spend far more hours of your life working, but you’ll only controlled 20% of all household purchases. Even though men die younger, women’s health recieves 4 times more funding. If you ever lose your home, you’ll likely be sleeping on a park bench or in a jail cell because most shelters only give a damn about women and children. If your wife e…
/r/MensRights06/01/14 08:34 AM
5

This can only be described as a disgrace.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 04:31 AM
17

The comment by AC says it best: This is just a beginning of terrorism by modern feminism in India! Every kind of sex between a man and woman will be called "rape" to the point that real rape-victims and the girl who feels guilty after consesual sex will come under the same category. Eventually, feminist will have complete control over sex in the country, specifying what is prescribed, what is not, and anyone who opposes them will be shamed, and publicly harassed. If men and women of India don't …
/r/MensRights26/12/13 10:07 AM
2

It has nothing to do with what is correct and proper, but rather ideological misandrist radical feminism, which basically views the human penis as a tool of oppression against women. Combine that with radfem's theories of male hyperagency and female hypoagency, and walla, we end up with something which is a crime only if you are born a boy.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 04:01 PM
2

This on the surface should wake up to why sex work should be legal, and safe houses / brothels used to make sex work safer for both workers and clients. However, as usual the misandrist feminists and social conservatives will be pushing like crazy to outlaw it through underhanded means of "protecting women" by completely misrepresenting and fabricating the truth. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-debate/a-prostitution-solution-outlaw-the-customers-not-the-hookers/article12306020/ Just read th…
/r/MensRights21/12/13 01:22 AM
1

Bebopper76 is quite possibly my favourite society observer, consistently pointing out the feminist lies and the androheterophobia prevalent in our society.
/r/MensRights19/12/13 11:50 PM
3

I think the following quote suggests it is all about creating manginas: “I often discuss these issues with my girlfriend, who worked at a male-dominated company for a while. She’s helped me understand some of the more subtle ways women may feel at an environment like that. But that doesn’t mean I always know exactly what to do or how to react to different situations,” Jimenez said in an email. “I joined Manbassadors with the hope to expand my understanding and that of others.”
/r/MensRights19/12/13 11:42 PM
12

Maggie does it again. Outlining why Sweden is perhaps the most misandrist country on earth.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 02:37 PM
1

Excellent post, can I ask where your source for the information regarding the real story of what occurred please?
/r/MensRights12/12/13 12:03 AM
1

His post was sarcasm or irony I believe. Your reaction was understandable, however you misinterpreted the situation here. There's no need for personal attacks here please.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 04:04 AM
1

Kicking Turkies, I can understand your anger in this matter. However Mr Harlan is one of the reasons we are even here today. If you need examples of sexism against males, then please do yourself a favour and spend the time to read through Community of The Wrongly Accused (google search it). There are numerous case studies and analysis there of real examples of insane sexism against people because they happen to be born boys.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 03:57 AM
-1

Do you know who you are talking to? Have some respect kiddo!
/r/MensRights10/12/13 03:53 AM
12

And I constantly get told by all my SJW friends on facebook, how tough girls and women have it in Afghanistan. The gyncocentric nature of these people is beyond belief.
/r/MensRights10/12/13 01:11 AM
1

A decent list.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 04:34 AM
2

"Meagan Tyler is a volunteer with the Coalition Against Trafficking in Women Australia" That says about all you need to know. It is a group which includes the despicable likes of radical feminists misandrist preachers who have ivory towers in universities. They want to control all men and all women who happily provide sex, because they have a moral problem with it. This whole notion and idea is androheterophobic, and the only reason it is even considered is due to the massive misandry and anti-s…
/r/MensRights05/12/13 04:32 AM
2

Hopefully the French will somehow avoid these stupid misandrist and anti-sex laws.
/r/MensRights05/12/13 04:32 AM
2

I have a term for these people - it's androheterophobic.
/r/MensRights03/12/13 04:41 AM
1

Bebopper is awesome. He shines the light on the pure depravity of feminists and social justice warriors. They are not interested in the truth, they are just interested in their ideology. Which in the case of radical feminists, is to view consensual heterosexual sex as male violence against females. Brilliant site taking on the androheterophobic feminists and do-gooders. Great stuff by bebopper taking on these people who manufacture victimhood to help generate more funds for furthering salaries a…
/r/MensRights02/12/13 01:07 PM
1

Thanks for your viewpoint, however I disagree with your assessment. Oscar Scwarz is one of the few people standing up against androheterophobia.
/r/MensRights02/12/13 04:56 AM
2

Of course I know that. I was asking who The Pigman is in real life. Oscar Scwarz is a Swede who has grown and lived there and has examined the society and how radical feminism has taken over and turned it into an androheterophobic state. So, therefore I am surprised by your claim that the Pigman is more knowledgeable about Sweden than Oscar.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 12:55 AM
0

Arguably, however feminism is framed as gender equality, and as we know, it is anything but.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 12:52 AM
2

Really?! The Pigman is pretty cool, however I would find that unlikely, though it is possible. Who exactly is the Pigman?
/r/MensRights30/11/13 03:05 PM
1

Now that's a story you won't see in the mainstream. Well done to cnsnews.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 03:03 PM
1

Well what can I say, I reckon if someone provides a unique perspective and can back up what they say with some properly thought out analysis, then that deserves a top grade. Here, not everything is backed up, however, at least it is a unique perspective, not adhering to just following the crowd, or adhering to what is expected. That deserves some credit!
/r/MensRights30/11/13 02:59 PM
2

Don't know how this will run, but it is certainly an interesting runner to see how it will compare to lulu. Like I said, an equivalent app to counteract lulu had to be made to highlight lulu, and I guess we will see what happens. For this app to compare to lulu, obviously it needs to gain some traction.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 02:51 PM
3

There is some seriously bad stuff going on in the home of misandrist feminism. Get a copy of Oscar Scwarz - How Sweden redefined rape and declared war on Julian Assange. (or author/title similar to that effect).
/r/MensRights30/11/13 02:44 PM
2

More radfems. Hang on tight team, the radfems are going to continue to f**k us over for the next ten years. Then, the comeback will begin, and all radfems will be viewed in the same light as klu klux klanners.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 02:42 PM
2

Oh my frickin god! That's insane. How dumb are those feminists! They think there are no biological differences between the sexes (except when it suits them) and anyone who doesn't agree with their sh*t is a misogynist. It's insane.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 02:36 PM
2

I want a fedora!
/r/MensRights30/11/13 02:25 PM
1

theantifeminist is quite possibly my favourite gender equality website. Once again they've come up with the goods.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 02:21 PM
1

Well said. It's just like the massive decline in boys as a percentage of students in higher education. The reasons to help boys aren't for equality, they are not for equity, they are not to help boys themselves, rather it is because it is now harder for girls to get dates on campus and harder for women to find men equal or higher than their own educational status and money earning capacity to marry. Yep, gotta love the gynocentric world we live in.
/r/MensRights30/11/13 01:47 AM
1

I_am_Norwegian, you are a great person. I still very much dislike your country though, for its misandrist laws.
/r/MensRights28/11/13 12:17 PM
2

The fact that this project is commissioned by White Ribbon, does not sound positive at all. The focus perhaps seemed too much on trying to shape boys, rather than simply saying being a boy or being a girl is cool. That boys and girls are typically different due to biology, however there is plenty of overlap, meaning many boys will be more interested in typical girl things and vice versa. And that boys and girls complement each other, and should not view each other as enemies. There were some pos…
/r/MensRights28/11/13 11:59 AM
5

The best way to get it banned is to setup an analogous SuSu app which is only for men to rate women. Then see the feminazi going crazy, and the hypocrisy from the social justice warriors will be apparent. That is the best way - seems a great idea. Any developers out there?
/r/MensRights27/11/13 03:25 PM
1

There should also be another aspect of the test. No violence against men, particularly female violence against men. How many movies and TV series particularly from misandrist Hollywood do we see where men are just presented as objects to be brutalized and killed, and it is seen as comedy.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 01:46 AM
1

Absolutely. For instance if you are born a boy, many feminists believe you cannot even have an opinion, just for that immutable characteristic. The only reason I am often allowed to even be heard is because I am non-white. You are absolutely right, feminism is racist, sexist and androheterophobic.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 01:33 AM
8

Parents need to step up. I'm doing my part, raising a son to respect women and himself by talking to him about how to navigate the freedom that comes with college life. But we need to do more work to teach our daughters that women also have an equal personal responsibility to respect their bodies. Still rather blue pillish. And the problem with this sort of mentality is, we are saying as a society the onus is on the person to prove innocence, which is just wrong.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 01:25 AM
7

Well good on you for actually understanding the reality. May you keep on writing and keep on going with standing up against the blatant sexism of feminism, and the almost complete lack of caring about the happiness of men in our society.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 02:59 AM
4

Good comments, as usual these feminist douches ignore the benefits and perquisites of being female and grossly exaggerate the negatives. Had enough of these feminist douches.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 02:49 AM
6

Overall an excellent article. The first paragraph looks like it was put there to appease the feminists and social justice warriors and sexists though: It's difficult to deny that women suffer more than men as a result of >highlighting the myriad ways in which this happens is one of the >cornerstones of modern feminism – which is currently enjoying a >revival in the UK and elsewhere. And then the rest of the article actually shows solid evidence that the above statement is rather shaky.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 02:44 AM
1

That documentary was brilliant. I really like you I_am_Norwegian, you come up with consistently good and insightful comments here.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 02:38 AM
2

A telling statistic is that in the last decade despite the overwhelming number of women in higher education, they have declined from 23% to 15% in Information Technology. This is further evidence that men and women have different preferences - before women were only enrolling in this course, not because they were interested in it, but because it was seen as a high paying career.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 02:36 AM
31

It shows that it is institutionalized that women are valued and worth more as human beings than men. This whole white male privilege should be changed to white female privilege - they are after all the most valued and protected and cared for and privileged people in our society by a long way.
/r/MensRights26/11/13 02:32 AM
5

An excellent article pointing out how silly and overrun by feminists and social justice warriors and white knights our society is, we only view women as humans worthy of compassion and kindness, and men - meeeh, who cares if they get killed or beaten.
/r/MensRights25/11/13 02:47 PM
1

The comment by Motorway points out the pure stupidity of this law: and if someone who I don't realize is in a relationship with me checks my status, is there a law to protect my reputation if she then shares the result with friend(s)? And what happens if the story gets changed like during chinese whispers? And how will I ever know that I lost out on something because someone who shouldn't know - did (and worst still wasn't told the truth).
/r/MensRights25/11/13 01:57 PM
2

It is pretty obvious people have misinterpreted what I've said. People have reacted the way I'd imagine they would at r/feminism. Mind you, I wouldn't last a day over there in that echo chamber.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 10:04 AM
7

Is it just me, or can anyone else notice how no comments are allowed for this article?
/r/MensRights24/11/13 04:31 AM
2

MGA Karma refers to fairfax as femfax. And I would wholeheartedly agree with that. I hope femfax becomes even more loss making than it already is for publishing lies.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 04:30 AM
3

What an unbelievable piece article written by a white knight. It is men who we have been brutalising for thousands of years, much more than women. Also, men are equally likely to be victims of violence behind closed doors, and much, much more likely to be victims of violence outside. This article promotes damaging stereotypes. Jeremy Meltzer, is clearly ignorant and indoctrinated.
/r/MensRights24/11/13 04:29 AM
2

Denmark and Finland are fine and still liberal at the moment. Denmark came very close to having it outlawed in 2012 when the new government took office. Sweden is the home of radical feminism and in classic style they implemented a law which makes it illegal for men, but legal for women, and that law was implemented last millennium (though it is worded gender neutral). Norway and Iceland are just like Sweden now. And that perhaps is the worst and most misandrist aspect of Sweden, they are active…
/r/MensRights24/11/13 01:11 AM
0

And I agree it is a matter of marketing - and clever marketing, for men as a group illicit no sympathy from society. But male friends and family do. That's what I was saying, thanks for all the downvotes for commenting on reality.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 02:01 PM
3

Absolutely. Of all the religions, Sikhism is arguably the best.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 05:45 AM
3

"It is part of the White Ribbon campaign to end violence against women. Keynote speakers include documentary filmmaker Byron Hurt and Carlos Andrés Gómez, author of Man Up: Reimagining Modern Manhood." Not sounding too promising at all.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 05:42 AM
1

Thanks too.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 05:40 AM
4

As usual in these anti-sex countries, the policies are written gender neutral, but only view females as victims, and males as perpetrators. These anti-sex policies in Scandinavia and America just drive everything underground. Much better to have a more open policy which everyone understands what is going on and is much easier to police, for instance like they do in New Zealand. One of the keys to improving the situation is to form a non-judgmental policy similar to New Zealand's. However, this s…
/r/MensRights23/11/13 05:10 AM
1

Many people from Iceland seem to be in complete denial of how misandrist their country is, and believe it is gender equal. Take this example from this bizarre Icelandic woman: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1qwb2s/rape_porn_possession_to_be_punished_by_three/cdhtszo
/r/MensRights23/11/13 05:03 AM
1

Usual stuff; boys and men do not matter, and cannot be viewed as victims, pretty much no matter what. Oh, unless it is a man who is the perpetrator.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 05:00 AM
4

Agree with ThePigman here.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 04:59 AM
-16

Notice how it says "Let's protect the men we love". This says a great deal - it says that men are not valued for being men, the same way that women are valued, simply for being alive (much like children). So the only way to get any sympathy whatsoever for men, is to relate it back to the personal men in peoples' lives.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 04:57 AM
1

Can you please tell us which app is the male equivalent for Lulu?
/r/MensRights23/11/13 04:55 AM
0

ratemash.com. Doesn't sound as bad as LuLu. But yep, you guessed it, because it affects women, there is outrage. Usual rubbish from our society - men do not matter.
/r/MensRights23/11/13 04:52 AM
1

I actually think feminism is getting stronger in terms of its influence, but weaker, in terms of people finding out the ugly and hideous truth about it.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 08:24 AM
2

Some interesting analysis.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 08:17 AM
2

You have to look at education as self-improvement and something which will make you a better person, rather than viewing it purely as a means for economic merit. If you are only doing it for economic merit, then yes, it may not be good value. However, often one can gain a lot from academic pursuit.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 08:15 AM
5

Sounds like a typical brat! But I hope you love that brat too, because she is your sister. When she started laughing at you about the dentist, that was probably the moment for you to start tickling her :-) To be honest, it sounded like she wanted some attention from you. For now, perhaps you could keep careful watch over your stuff and actively ignore her for the next few days as punishment, and then do something nice for her. And if she does something bad to you, just start sarcastically saying…
/r/MensRights22/11/13 08:08 AM
1

Thanks for letting me know. Yep, definitely a troll/radfem. I had to deal with some weird Icelandic woman the other day who was also a troll/radfem it appeared. What is AMR by the way?
/r/MensRights22/11/13 01:08 AM
5

I'll repeat those last sentences: Mark: Do they have a companion app for guys to rate girls? Sarina: No, they don't, and I'm happy that that day hasn't come yet. When it does, that will be a different story. Says it all, doesn't it? Despite all this nonsense, I'm going to head out and enjoy myself on Sunday, doing what I love. FU Feminazi!
/r/MensRights22/11/13 01:03 AM
2

I've read the book. Baumeister is pretty amazing, and there are tons and tons of links and references as well within the book. His book will go down as an all time classic.
/r/MensRights22/11/13 12:58 AM
1

Have you even read the article? I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt that you are not a troll or radfem. "one state that examined the problem found as many as 30 percent of those paying child support were, indeed, not the biological fathers of the children being supported."
/r/MensRights21/11/13 03:19 PM
2

Relax mate. Exactly why I said "it appears that perhaps". I did not accept that as a universal number, just one statistic.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 11:21 AM
1

Most people here recognize the Icelandic laws I'm talking about as misandric, anti-freedom, oppressive and totalitarian. The people who agree with those laws are radical feminists (they are the people who thought up these misandric laws), mainstream Scandinavian feminists, social conservatives, religious fundamentalists, anti-sex groups, and androheterophobes. To fight these and many other misandric laws means dissecting and deconstructing the ideology behind them - Scandinavian feminism. You ha…
/r/MensRights21/11/13 08:16 AM
0

You are not talking about facts, you are talking about some measures concocted by a feminist hegemony. Once again, you have not quoted me, you've altered the quote. I'm sure you believe the "1 in 4 women get raped on campus" as a fact as well. You continue with the ad hominem attacks. It is ignorant and indoctrinated people such as yourself which shows exactly why the MHRM is needed. You say you have experience in Iceland, however there is every chance that you are making that up too. You just i…
/r/MensRights21/11/13 04:53 AM
2

The actual article this thread is talking about.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 03:50 AM
1

No, you did take things and quote me incorrectly. Take a look at the comment history for this thread. These gender equality measures are simply gender equality measures defined by feminists. Iceland is famous for being a radical feminist hotbed. As everyone in this subreddit is familiar with, aspects such as the gender wap are highly distorted. You continually fail address the issues I brought up - that Iceland has outlawed strip clubs due to its radical feminist hegemony. And you carry on about…
/r/MensRights21/11/13 03:44 AM
1

I stand by all my words. You are the person who put those words in my mouth. I am happy to hear about your experience in Iceland. I do not doubt the niceness of the people of Iceland; I have met many from Scandinavia, and pretty much all of them have been lovely. My issue isn't the people or the beauty of the country, rather the misandric laws. Sweden, Norway and Iceland are all competing with each other to see who can have the most misandric laws. These countries are all hotbeds for radical fem…
/r/MensRights21/11/13 03:23 AM
1

These rather silly arguments can even happen between us people here, who are ostensibly arguing for the same thing - equal and fair rights for men and boys. Take a look at this bizarre debate someone is having with me regarding David Cameron and his pornography ban. Someone started saying how good Iceland was, I then contributed the perspective that it is not so great, based on its laws, and the person unfortunately got rather upset. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1qwb2s/rape_porn_p…
/r/MensRights21/11/13 03:16 AM
0

I have articulated clearly why Iceland is viewed the way it is. And you just you resort to ad hominem attacks, and simply do not address the issues. What lead Iceland to these laws? Who was responsible for these laws? Why did the Icelandic public allow these laws with no resistance? Are the Icelandic public so brainwashed with radical misandrist feminism and androheterophobia, or do they simply do as the government asks them? These are the questions I would hope you would address with your exper…
/r/MensRights21/11/13 03:09 AM
3

Yep, the usual rubbish from this sexist author - carrying on how IMD is 364 days in the year.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 02:48 AM
4

This is hilarious. Because all the PUA's will behave like boys, and ironically enough, it will give them a better chance to be with the girl. Ha ha. This is like dating advice from feminists! Except for the one where the man picks the place to have dinner!
/r/MensRights21/11/13 02:29 AM
1

Perhaps, what we need is separate Mens divisions and separate Womens divisions.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 02:25 AM
0

It is clear you are blinded by your love of Iceland. You are now exaggerating what I have said. In this thread I did not refer to Iceland as a "stupid totalitarian state". I did say its laws of "Swedish Model" and nudity were stupid and totalitarian and misandrist and inline with fundamental religious extremists. Me an extremist? Are you a feminist? A mangina? A white knight? I'm sorry, you are the epitome of why it is pointless to reason with people. And I base it on this silly comment of yours…
/r/MensRights21/11/13 02:07 AM
3

Good stuff for Barbara Kay for pointing out areas where women are under-represented is due to self-selection.
/r/MensRights21/11/13 01:58 AM
1

I should define 'green' - it means new to something. As in 'brand new' and 'fresh' and not aged. Eg. green wood.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 02:44 PM
0

Iceland IS in need of men's rights. There are regular protests there from feminazi about the mythical gender wage gap. Iceland, Sweden and Norway are a hotbed of radfem misandrist ideology. If Iceland is so free why has it outlawed female nudity? Why has it implemented the incredibly misandric 'Swedish Model'. My arguments - based on laws and logic, clearly identifying Iceland as a misandric country. Your arguments - Anecdotal. You still haven't addressed why Iceland has such androheterophobic l…
/r/MensRights20/11/13 02:36 PM
1

To the uninitiated what I say can sound a little 'out there'. However. Which group asks for censorship? Which group asks for more government regulations? Which group wants to criminalize men for trivial matters and victimless crimes? Which group wants to make it illegal to be an anti-feminist? Which group only views women as victims and men as depraved oppressors? Which group is androheterophobic? It's a rabbit hole, and the deeper you delve, the more bizarre the feminist ideology becomes. Well …
/r/MensRights20/11/13 02:28 PM
1

Actually a good article on genital cutting. However, when is this person going to realize? Feminists don't care about boys. Indeed, many of them like to actively harm boys, and take glee in baby boys genitals being cut.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 02:20 PM
1

This is a seriously stupid article. I cannot believe how indoctrinated, ignorant, bigoted and pure fuckin stupid some of these people are.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 02:13 PM
1

I think you need to realise that feminism is "the radical notion that men ARE not people" or something similar.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 02:00 PM
1

Wow, an excellent link identifying so many things feminists have done to actively oppose the basic human rights of men and boys.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 01:57 PM
1

Good news, this website works again! After months of being disabled, for who knows what reason. No surprise coming from Sweden. Land of the manginas!
/r/MensRights20/11/13 01:49 PM
1

Hope this initiative takes off. Best of luck!
/r/MensRights20/11/13 01:38 PM
3

Some excellent points for the OP.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 01:31 PM
1

Another hit piece on the MHRM. This person is delusional: "vocal concern about male wellbeing is used as a cover for their campaigns against feminism and gay rights." Funny how he brings gay rights into this? The MHRM is pro-freedom, so is actually supportive of gay rights. And we oppose feminism, because feminism has caused so many stupid misandrist laws. Feminism is NOT women. We support women. As usual, more crap journalism comes out on IMD.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 01:18 PM
2

Good comment: Today is also "INTERNATIONAL MEN'S DAY". The fact the United Nations should choose "WORLD TOILET DAY" as the same day is a disgrace. The disregard by the UN for the well being of men who are struggling in this World is breathtaking. All they asked for was one day of the year, ie Nov 19th., the UN makes it Toilet Day. It is inconceivable they did not know this was International Men's Day. Well done Ban-Ki Moon. This example will be quoted for years as an example of the disregard for…
/r/MensRights20/11/13 01:12 PM
5

I think we need to stop linking to this slug's website. This guy writes worthless guttertrash to appease traditionalists, feminists, and misandrists.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 06:31 AM
2

It appears that perhaps 30% of men paying child support are not actually the biological fathers. Wow.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 06:25 AM
1

Nice page which links to a lot of good resources.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 06:19 AM
1

Some real interesting statistics there, showing that in black communities women arguably kill their husbands more than the other way around.
/r/MensRights20/11/13 06:09 AM
3

Welcome aboard axeketeer. I also see many of the problems and discriminations against men as being caused by feminism. The feminists will combine with social conservatives, religious fundamentalists when pursuing censorship, or will combine with marxist socialists when pursuing other goals. Basically I think it is a case of feminism = totalitarianism, censorship, conformity, group-think, control and in particular androheterophobia. And Men's Rights = freedom, freedom of speech, equality of oppor…
/r/MensRights20/11/13 04:04 AM
3

Another couple of good comments in the section: Imagine the outrage if the genders were switched in this article?... Men, gather round. We have a problem. The problem is women. They are in crisis. Dreadful things are afoot for them, and they need our help. Despite the fact most homeless are men, most prisoners are men, most suicides are men, most workplace fatalities are men and most victims of violence are men- women are not happy. It's not just because no-one's invented a 0 calorie bar of choc…
/r/MensRights20/11/13 03:21 AM
14

Seems like these misandrist articles come out even more during International Men's Day. They indeed highlight why we need a day focusing on men and the happiness and well-being of men, because 364 days of the year we are focusing on women.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 05:33 PM
1

Thought it was pretty good how he analogized the manosphere being about civil liberties, freedom and the free market, and feminism being about big government, totalitarianism and socialism. Personally I don't think socialism in itself is a problem, rather its implementation where the government interferes in the private lives of citizens.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 05:31 PM
1

I am critiquing Iceland for having a radical feminist hegemony, and therefore implementing totalitarian laws under the guise of rational thought to criminalize innocent men. This has nothing to do with being to Iceland or not, it has to do with the totalitarian laws in that country that are inline with fundamental religious extremists, yet Iceland claims it is not done on a 'moralistic basis'.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 07:30 AM
1

Are you for real? Iceland is the very example of how we end up with stupid laws, and stupid totalitarian censorship and control over the private lives of human beings. They are done based on puritanism, yet are disguised as rational thought. Here's an example: http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opinion/2013/04/20134274739879996.html "...who is currently drafting the legislation, is looking specifically at restricting pornography that is hardcore, violent and cruel. " "Iceland's work to phase out t…
/r/MensRights19/11/13 03:43 AM
2

If more white women were subjected to these outrageous and cruel laws, then there would be the will to get them changed. As it stands, nobody cares that much about them, because nobody cares much about men.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 02:09 AM
1

Pretty good. Very good advertisement. Almost a shame that youtube put a warning on it. Just like David Cameron, youtube will put a warning on things that the feminazi want a warning for.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 02:06 AM
2

Another interesting historical find. I guess 100 years on, things are not so different.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 02:01 AM
3

If the sexes were reversed he would be guilty and in prison. I remember reading about this case when it came out. However, without all the evidence I obviously cannot adjudicate. The problem is the jury only seems to know what reasonable doubt is, when it is a female as a defendant, and particularly if the victim was a male.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 01:58 AM
2

The guy is the very definition of a mangina. Good riddance to bad rubbish.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 01:56 AM
3

This is stupid. However, even worse, the opposition party - Labour - are even worse on these issues than the Torries.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 01:47 AM
1

How hilarious it says it wants to eliminate "totalitarian ideologies" and in the same breath it wants to eliminate "anti-feminism" - a movement devoted almost entirely to eliminating a totalitarian ideology. The stupidity of these idiots. Anti-feminism IS NOT anti-women.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 01:40 AM
5

"Germans (the Greens, especially) mistrust the state on questions of personal morality as a hypocritical and authoritarian threat to self-expression. Only this can explain why Swedes continue overwhelmingly to support their policy, and Germans theirs." That's the thing I admire most about Germans. They don't like being told what to do by authoritarians (must have had something to do with their government in the 1930's...). Just hope the Germans can keep up with their liberalism, because they are…
/r/MensRights19/11/13 01:38 AM
2

Great website. Love the tagline, it's time to recognize feminism for what it really is - misandry.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 01:31 AM
1

Sick of the feminazi and their false narrative on DV.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 01:24 AM
0

This is ridiculous. Sure she could argue she had the sperm, but that does not allow her to impregnate herself with that sperm.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 01:19 AM
3

Ridiculous, why aren't 30% of the worst jobs be compulsory to have females? This is bullshit.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 01:16 AM
1

Iceland free? Are you for real? They have even banned strip clubs over there - not due to religion but due to the feminazi. And they are looking at outlawing all Internet porn in Iceland. Iceland is WORSE.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 01:12 AM
1

Problem is, how do you distinguish? This could create all sorts of legal issues. And why is it only when women are being raped? What about men being raped? The misandrist and totalitarian regime of Britain has come to the fore.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 01:08 AM
1

This is bizarre to the extreme. Does this mean visiting a mainstream bdsm site like kink.com will mean three years in prison. And what about all the sites which show women raping men? Or men raping men? So sick of the feminazi. David Cameron and his party are bad, but British Labour are even worse. What the fuck is wrong with England, why the fuck is England turning into Sweden?
/r/MensRights19/11/13 01:06 AM
1

This line of thinking is very similar to the antifeminist blog, which is that women hate other women who appeal to men.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 01:00 AM
11

Funny how they justify her aggression and physical violence against the man due to him "giving her wrong directions" and her "being late to her hospital appointment". Usual, it's okay to hit men nonsense from A Current Affair.
/r/MensRights19/11/13 12:55 AM
1

That is truly insane, what has America come to? Poor Justin Carter.
/r/MensRights18/11/13 03:07 AM
1

Nicely put. A bit like how in some circles (particularly in the past) blacks are thought of as dirty and soiled and godless, and whites as clean and pure and the chosen people of god. In regards to the way society views male and female sexuality, I think it has more to do with evolutionary sociobiology than feminism, however feminism has certainly accentuated that view even more.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 02:58 PM
1

You guys would know my answer to the question I posed in the title, a resounding yes. And a big FU to this article. FU The Guardian and your misandrist male heterophobic radfem authors. FU.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 02:50 PM
22

This probably sounds a bit insane, but perhaps the best thing you can do is to go public with this story. Write a book about it, write about your experiences in jail. Write how even your family turned against you (aunt), and you are forever painted as a monster. This is a movie script!
/r/MensRights17/11/13 02:47 PM
7

And I'll repeat it: "Every year in Britain around 90 women,20 men and 60 children die as a result of domestic violence.It's estimated that 1 in 4 women and 1 in 6 men will suffer from domestic violence at some point in their lives.And around a third of those most seriously injured as a result of domestic violence will be men.Children and teenagers are also vulnerable to both sexual and non-sexual abuse with girls more likely than boys to be the victims of sexual abuse and boys more likely than g…
/r/MensRights17/11/13 12:06 PM
-1

100% spot on.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 12:01 PM
3

The feminist Taliban at it again.
/r/MensRights17/11/13 06:06 AM
8

An interesting study, highlighting unless a man pedestalises women he must be misogynistic!
/r/MensRights17/11/13 05:31 AM
2

You comments are welcome. I think the key point your little brother is making is that the reason there is a "gender wage gap" is due to the fact that on aggregate men work longer, work harder jobs, work more dangerous jobs (19 out of 20 people killed on the job are men), and work worse hours (graveyard shifts). It has very little to do with discrimination, indeed, it appears if anything, it is an advantage to be female in terms of looking for jobs in many industries. Females who have never had c…
/r/MensRights16/11/13 06:48 AM
2

What about the specific song written about the MHRM - Jared White - Those Who Oppose Us: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qG_Jxt6N-Ek
/r/MensRights16/11/13 04:57 AM
3

This is a mindless advertisement, It is difficult to get through, I've just got it on in the background while doing other stuff. If someone can get through this properly please do so and report. Because this is as boring as advertising rubbish. "This method will show you how to make a man feel incredible love you so" "I'll show you how to make any man feel peak attraction to you" "Men only like to chase pretty women? Yes. No, this technique will make men feel heavily drawn to you" "This is so po…
/r/MensRights16/11/13 04:45 AM
2

What a misandric nonsense piece. Maureen Dowd is nothing less than a misandrist scumbag.
/r/MensRights16/11/13 03:35 AM
3

Dude, I've lost so many friends on facebook - people who I had been friends for years with. They always come up with the same rubbish - "Why do you hate women?" etc. etc. etc. It's like anyone who doesn't support misandry and women being pedestalized must hate women! Just send a positive message and end it. Being part of the MHRM can be tricky, but all I can say is it is incredibly liberating to know that we know the truth, and these gender ideolgoues are as ignorant as the church desperately ha…
/r/MensRights16/11/13 03:31 AM
1

Gotta agree with raptorrage here. The key matter was sharing a photo which was private. However, think what happens when the sexes are reversed. There was a famous case involving Nick Riewoldt, and the female in that case was viewed as the victim. Always the same with feminists and social conservatives - female hypoagency - only females are victims.
/r/MensRights16/11/13 03:19 AM
2

Seems like the winner has removed her Twitter. So I'm guessing there's been some 'slut-shaming' of her. However, as we know in the MHRM, this tends to be done by women, and certainly not be many within our movement such as theantifeminist.com. And speaking of the devil, I have just gone to their website, and they have a post about this article! A lot of slut-shaming has to do with unattractive women wanting to reduce the supply of sex with men, in order to elevate their power against men.
/r/MensRights16/11/13 03:11 AM
3

Wow. What a great historical article from almost 25 years ago.
/r/MensRights15/11/13 01:48 PM
1

We have the truth and facts on our side. So they have to appeal to manginas and white knights. This will not be an easy fight, it is hilarious how to label people providing analysis and informed debate as "trolls".
/r/MensRights15/11/13 07:45 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter