TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JeremiahMRA Archive

View 205 posts and 2,347 comments by JeremiahMRA on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Title Category Author Subreddit Date (UTC)
299

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights02/02/12 07:10 PM
290

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights30/12/11 07:45 AM
284

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights31/12/11 07:19 PM
235

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights08/01/12 06:37 AM
164

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights05/02/12 11:14 AM
109

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights12/11/11 06:39 AM
92

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights08/01/12 08:57 PM
90

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights11/02/12 02:31 AM
87

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights01/01/12 05:34 AM
77

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights02/01/12 02:07 AM
63

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights14/02/12 05:29 AM
60

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights11/11/11 06:10 PM
45

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights02/03/12 09:28 PM
35

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights15/12/11 05:27 PM
31

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights04/03/12 04:56 AM
31

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights18/01/12 06:51 AM
29

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights04/02/12 02:57 AM
28

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights11/12/11 10:19 PM
28

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights02/02/12 07:01 PM
27

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights26/12/11 06:04 PM
25

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights15/11/11 03:59 AM
25

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights09/01/12 12:49 AM
24

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights02/01/12 02:11 AM
23

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights14/11/11 01:06 AM
22

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights29/11/11 11:42 PM
21

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights02/01/12 03:34 AM
21

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights27/12/11 02:59 AM
16

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights19/02/12 12:37 AM
16

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights03/02/12 07:34 AM
16

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights06/01/12 07:41 AM
15

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights26/01/12 08:10 AM
15

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights04/02/12 02:47 AM
15

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights25/12/11 02:17 AM
15

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights24/12/11 08:18 PM
13

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights17/12/11 02:25 PM
13

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights24/02/12 12:30 AM
13

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights26/01/12 08:10 AM
13

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights18/01/12 08:00 AM
13

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights18/01/12 03:47 AM
12

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights16/01/12 09:22 PM
12

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights15/12/11 09:46 PM
12

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights13/11/11 06:27 PM
12

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights13/11/11 03:33 AM
12

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights24/01/12 05:55 AM
12

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights30/12/11 09:08 PM
12

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights28/01/12 11:17 PM
11

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights08/03/12 02:19 AM
11

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights31/12/11 10:43 PM
10

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights11/12/11 10:20 PM
10

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights28/02/12 08:36 PM
10

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights27/12/11 10:38 PM
10

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights20/12/11 10:11 PM
10

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights19/01/12 04:48 AM
10

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights18/01/12 08:03 AM
9

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights03/01/12 04:27 AM
9

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights09/02/12 08:16 AM
9

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights01/01/12 06:09 AM
9

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights26/12/11 06:04 PM
9

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights11/02/12 10:09 PM
8

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights12/12/11 08:18 AM
8

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights16/01/12 11:54 PM
8

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights03/01/12 11:44 PM
8

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights09/01/12 02:14 AM
8

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights07/03/12 07:42 PM
7

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights03/01/12 06:45 PM
7

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights05/02/12 11:43 AM
7

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights05/02/12 08:25 AM
7

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights14/12/11 10:13 AM
6

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights17/12/11 02:26 PM
6

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights02/01/12 07:40 AM
6

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights19/01/12 06:20 AM
6

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights18/01/12 07:59 AM
6

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights02/02/12 07:23 PM
5

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights28/01/12 02:15 AM
5

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights29/11/11 12:17 AM
5

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights05/02/12 11:28 PM
5

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights09/01/12 02:21 AM
5

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights12/11/11 06:42 AM
5

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights27/12/11 10:32 PM
5

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights04/02/12 02:43 AM
5

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights31/12/11 10:49 PM
5

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights14/12/11 09:43 AM
5

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights31/12/11 06:34 PM
5

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights18/01/12 07:10 AM
5

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights06/03/12 05:25 PM
5

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights06/01/12 07:19 AM
4

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights04/01/12 10:46 PM
4

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights05/02/12 11:48 AM
4

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights05/02/12 11:47 AM
4

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights03/01/12 04:24 AM
4

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights26/01/12 12:20 AM
4

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights11/11/11 06:34 AM
4

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights06/03/12 05:30 PM
3

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights22/01/12 11:53 PM
3

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights04/01/12 10:37 PM
3

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights16/12/11 10:51 PM
3

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights27/01/12 06:50 AM
3

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights25/01/12 12:42 AM
3

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights24/01/12 05:09 AM
3

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights24/01/12 05:05 AM
3

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights08/02/12 08:54 AM
3

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights03/02/12 07:31 AM
3

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights11/01/12 04:59 AM
2

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights27/01/12 03:52 AM
2

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights27/01/12 03:42 AM
2

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights12/01/12 10:30 PM
2

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights14/12/11 09:53 AM
2

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights14/12/11 09:36 AM
2

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights24/12/11 07:34 PM
2

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights11/02/12 09:20 PM
1

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights15/11/11 02:40 AM
1

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights10/01/12 12:06 AM
1

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights27/01/12 06:10 AM
1

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights09/01/12 09:42 PM
1

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights09/01/12 09:33 AM
1

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights23/02/12 11:32 PM
1

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:49 AM
1

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights27/12/11 12:30 AM
1

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights04/02/12 02:24 AM
1

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights03/02/12 10:19 PM
1

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights08/02/12 05:40 PM
1

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights24/01/12 12:15 AM
1

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights12/02/12 04:26 AM
1

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights23/01/12 09:43 PM
1

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights12/02/12 01:19 AM
1

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights11/02/12 10:00 PM
1

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights05/01/12 10:13 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights05/01/12 07:16 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights22/01/12 10:48 PM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:30 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights04/01/12 10:39 PM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights11/02/12 07:56 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights22/01/12 08:18 PM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights22/01/12 08:10 PM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:44 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights16/12/11 11:05 PM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights22/01/12 07:53 PM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights01/03/12 01:29 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights10/01/12 02:37 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights01/03/12 01:07 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights16/01/12 03:06 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights29/02/12 10:26 PM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights27/01/12 05:43 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights27/01/12 03:55 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights03/01/12 11:49 PM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights27/01/12 02:13 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights03/01/12 11:45 PM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights06/02/12 12:55 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights10/02/12 06:54 PM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights03/01/12 09:14 PM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights26/01/12 11:25 PM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights24/02/12 03:13 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights15/01/12 05:27 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights24/02/12 01:04 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:37 PM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights05/02/12 11:21 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights08/01/12 08:55 PM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights05/02/12 11:13 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights05/02/12 10:55 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights05/02/12 10:46 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights05/02/12 10:41 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights05/02/12 10:17 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights05/02/12 10:16 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:59 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:54 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:52 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:27 PM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:40 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights05/02/12 08:32 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights21/12/11 04:46 PM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights23/02/12 07:46 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights31/01/12 04:33 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights07/03/12 11:50 PM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights07/03/12 11:09 PM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:30 PM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights13/01/12 09:08 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights12/11/11 12:10 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights03/03/12 09:32 PM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights25/01/12 10:34 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights09/02/12 08:15 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights07/01/12 08:43 PM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights07/01/12 05:56 PM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights25/01/12 12:43 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights03/03/12 04:28 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights10/11/11 11:58 PM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights22/02/12 07:53 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights03/02/12 08:16 PM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights08/02/12 05:38 PM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights18/01/12 07:29 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights18/01/12 06:54 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights03/02/12 08:03 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights24/01/12 12:17 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights24/01/12 12:15 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights24/12/11 10:41 PM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights29/01/12 02:31 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights30/12/11 11:06 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights12/02/12 08:25 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights12/02/12 05:20 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights12/02/12 02:24 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights12/02/12 01:17 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights12/02/12 12:36 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights21/02/12 07:26 AM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights11/02/12 10:10 PM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights01/03/12 09:46 PM
0

JeremiahMRA/r/MensRights29/12/11 05:52 PM
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,347 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

The thread. I have the utmost respect for you.
/r/seduction20/03/12 08:06 PM
2

It's me, I explained it here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/qpq0b/i_no_longer_take_the_splc_seriously_you_shouldnt/c400yll?context=3 I'll be using the Guy name exclusively once I've copied my friends list over.
/r/MensRights13/03/12 03:35 AM
-4

Women are less oppressed than men in every society.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 11:04 PM
-42

International women's day just perpetuates the widespread myth that women are an oppressed group. Fuck international women's day.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 03:32 AM
1

The_patriarchy is a feminist troll.
/r/MensRights09/03/12 03:14 AM
2

Yeah I'll have to check out the NiceGuys forum. I also explained myself here. Too many overly sensitive people around here who don't understand squat.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 05:21 PM
2

What? I don't know the guy but he sounds like the type that wouldn't want to be a burden if shit hits the fan. That he doesn't have to see it is in a way a blessing. I talked to him only yesterday, and I have a feeling he knew what was coming. We spent an hour and a half talking about the Obamanation's seemingly purposeful destruction of our economy and culture. We talked about getting prepared for the worst. If the worst happens, men like Khank, if he was sick, don't want to be a burden to thei…
/r/MensRights08/03/12 05:10 PM
-11

It's useless and disrespectful.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 09:21 AM
-15

This is just annoying.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 07:35 AM
-12

Sounds like a good guy. At least he didn't have to stick around for what's to come in this "ObamaRomneyation", which in a way is a blessing for a sick old man.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 05:03 AM
-1

If a woman hits you, and you leave the room, she only gets more angry because she wants you to dominate her. Perhaps she cools down, but she'll do it again, in due time. You should probably read the articles I linked. The first makes the point that generally men TRY the very strategy you're talking about, but it doesn't work, and only makes things worse. Finally, the guy snaps because she has made him so pissed off. It doesn't matter if you don't think it's "right", that's what happens, and it c…
/r/MensRights08/03/12 04:53 AM
0

Seems reasonable to me. You should also read the linked article if you haven't yet. Maybe if society actually held women accountable for their bad behaviour instead of just shrugging it off as cute and funny, there would be no need to "keep them in line". I don't think society can keep women accountable if men can't even keep the people in their household accountable. Men today can't even give their children spankings safely. And therefore men have no power in the household. With men powerless, …
/r/MensRights08/03/12 04:42 AM
-3

Common sense. This is how domestic violence usually plays out: http://www.avoiceformen.com/men/how-to-slap-your-way-to-slavery/ Woman nags, nags, nags, and pushes the guys buttons, perhaps even slaps him around, until he finally retaliates. It's pretty clear Rihanna is a self-absorbed, narcissistic, and none too bright cunt. And usually it's the woman who starts shit, and escalates it, when it comes to these situations. The person escalating shit is the person who is more to blame, and that's al…
/r/MensRights08/03/12 04:08 AM
2

Yup, stark difference in how they were treated. And keep in mind Rihanna was the aggressor, not Chris Brown. Every time I heard someone on American Idol tonight - yes, I admit I watched it - say how great they thought Mary J. Blige was, I cringed.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 03:42 AM
1

Ron Paul
/r/MensRights08/03/12 03:10 AM
0

r/MensRights, the sub-reddit where the trolls act like the moderators and the moderators act like trolls.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 02:21 AM
0

And we see why the moderators don't ban you - you're useful for trolling actual MRAs. You actually sound exactly like ignatiusloyola when he trolls me for daring to point out his incompetence as a moderator. Go Team Troll! The fact that the anti-male trolls here hate me but love ignatiusloyola's policies proves just how terrible those policies are for men's rights.
/r/MensRights08/03/12 01:45 AM
1

The answer is women are attracted to status. In more developed, controlled societies, cooperative, docile “follow-the-rules” type men rise higher and faster than those who are more confrontational, forceful and combative. The masculine looking guy is more likely to be a dock worker or trucker, while the effete, overeducated type is more likely to be a high-level manager or administrator, perhaps in one of the social welfare bureaucracies that guarantee women are taken care of by the state. In st…
/r/MensRights07/03/12 11:50 PM
0

Within 30 seconds of posting NiceGuysSTFU posted and the thread was down-voted. I can't be certain it was him, but a troll will troll. Thanks for the up-vote, but stuff like this used to fair far better in the past.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 10:36 PM
-4

Finally, a Snooves post that doesn't ... wait, all your posts suck, as you're a mangina troll who deserves to be banned. Spare me the "Spearhead sucks" bullshit. Bill Price and the authors at the Spearhead are more MRAs than you will ever be. It's too bad the moderation policy doesn't call for banning concern trolls like you who constantly shit on the work of actual activists and never do a damn thing for men.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 07:59 PM
0

Thanks for the down-vote. If only the moderators would ban you, you wouldn't stick around here down-voting men's rights activism.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 07:44 PM
0

Qanan, you lie almost as well as ignatiusloyola. You forgot to mention how this started. Poor form. You contacted me in PMs and said you wanted to get a conservative-leaning moderator. You also told me you would keep me up to date. I spent hours putting together suggestions for you and my main suggestions for a conservative moderator were: Demonspawn (admittedly ignatius hates him so he was a longshot), thetrollking (great choice even though he's a moderate), and MRMrising. I quite clearly told …
/r/MensRights07/03/12 06:07 PM
-10

Okay? This really wasn't necessary because this rarely ever happens and when it does it's perfectly clear what took place. In other words, you solved a problem that doesn't exist. There are real problems in this sub-reddit like the constant anti-male trolling and ignatiusloyola's constant harassment of MRAs, including Paul Elam. But at least this makes it seem like you're doing something useful, huh?
/r/MensRights07/03/12 05:35 PM
1

The facts are there for all to see in your own comments where you harass MRAs and welcome feminists. My interpretations of why you behave in such a manner are secondary.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 05:22 PM
2

Is this a fabrication?
/r/MensRights07/03/12 04:51 AM
2

I realize that you may want this place to be a certain thing, but it won't necessarily end up that way. That is what other places are for. This place always has been a place to discuss all points of view, not a specific "safe space". In other words, you alone have decided that /r/mensrights is not a place for men's rights activism, where misandric trolls are welcomed and given the power to vote down submissions from MRAs. That is the result, as well you know.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 01:02 AM
2

You never stop do you? http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/q9fjn/i_just_wanted_to_say_that_i_think_this_subreddit/c3ydpqg?context=3
/r/MensRights07/03/12 12:51 AM
2

Will I listen to anything Jeremiah has to say? No. I just told you all that more verbosely than you deserved. I don't care if he has anything legitimate to say. Other people echo any legitimate ideas he has, so I feel perfectly safe in knowing that no decent ideas will be lost. Like who? All the other MRAs you harass constantly because they disagree with you too? Good joke.
/r/MensRights07/03/12 12:09 AM
3

To my dear ignatiusloyola: I am many things but I'm not a liar. Your behavior is well documented at places like /r/aboutmensrights, and it's been going on for months if not years. I'm not the only one complaining. But that's right, everyone who dares question your holiness is a white nationalist, deluded, or just uses multiple accounts, so you conveniently get to ignore the most vocal, passionate subset of MRAs at this sub-reddit. We "lose your ear" by not agreeing with you on everything, by try…
/r/MensRights06/03/12 11:33 PM
1

Right, anyone who points out your misbehavior is deluded. Or they're a white nationalist. Or they're just using multiple accounts. Yes, everyone who disagrees with you is BAD, we get it. You are a petulant child and you treat this sub-reddit like your play toy. A men's rights advocate wouldn't do that.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 07:46 PM
2

But you don't get to control the rules here because you are just one voice among many. I am one voice among many Men's rights activists who know what they're talking about, who you completely ignore and go do whatever suits your fancy. You need to work on that projection. I'm not looking for control, you are. I just want this sub-reddit to be a place for men's rights activists, not feminists, trolls, and manginas. You're the one who wants to control everything here so it suits your narrow view o…
/r/MensRights06/03/12 07:34 PM
1

An actual MRA would be concerned when a supposed men's rights sub-reddit is overrun by feminists and other misandrist trolls. I and other MRAs have been asking you to do something about the problem for months and months, and your response has always been either "fuck off", "boo hoo", or "leave". An MRA wouldn't do that. But you're not an MRA, are you?
/r/MensRights06/03/12 06:58 PM
1

And you prove yet again you're not an MRA.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 06:47 PM
4

Things change. You have made this sub-reddit a place where feminists, trolls, and manginas are more welcome than actual MRAs by refusing to deal with the very real problems we have, and even encouraging them by welcoming feminists, trolls, and manginas, and telling MRAs to leave. So don't play the "free speech" game.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 06:31 PM
4

Feminists have always been this way. They project women's emotions onto men. And they also have always been extremely envious of men. Feminists hate that they were born women, with all the foibles associated with women. They are pissed off they weren't born male, and therefore they want to tear men down.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 06:05 PM
0

Regardless of Legolas-the-white-knight's claims, the title is accurate. The study shows women like it when they make their husband's upset. This article at the spearhead touches on the topic as well: http://www.the-spearhead.com/2012/03/06/what-do-men-want-in-a-wife-and-why-wont-wives-oblige/
/r/MensRights06/03/12 05:43 PM
4

Nice how calls to activism are down-voted here. :/ I'd add the caveat that if you tell them about r/mensrights, tell them it's mostly full of feminists, trolls, and manginas these days, and to take it with a huge grain of salt. r/MR used to be a good intro site to the men's movement, but it's too full of ignatiusloyola's pals (the feminists, trolls, and manginas) now.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 05:19 PM
5

How did I come to be an MRActivist? By writing articles, editing, posting flyers, talking to people at work about men's rights issues, and donating money to organizations that help men. Till then I wasn't an MRA.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 08:37 AM
2

Remember when it was suggested to put a note in bold at the top of the sidebar for people to read the FAQ and not to post concern troll shit like this? I suggested it around a month ago. Remember when you didn't do it? Remember why? Hint, it's the same reason you tell MRAs to leave, you welcome feminists, and you don't ban anti-male trolls. You want this sub-reddit to be politically correct, not effective. So don't act like this isn't your problem. You caused it because you like it this way. You…
/r/MensRights06/03/12 08:18 AM
2

only some loud-mouths Yeah, the MRAs.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 08:04 AM
0

That men and women are equal / the same or that they ever can be.
/r/MensRights06/03/12 05:22 AM
-1

No, not really. Not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights05/03/12 11:00 PM
-2

No, you're just stupid.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 06:29 PM
2

Concern troll
/r/MensRights04/03/12 06:18 PM
-19

Sonja is a feminist, anti-male advocate who thinks men and women are the same and thinks men should subsidize women's birth control with their tax dollars: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/qbo8a/raising_conservative_daughters_that_is_how_a_good/c3waseg http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/qdchx/does_anybody_else_think_its_unfair_that_we_should/c3x3dnj?context=3
/r/MensRights04/03/12 05:11 AM
-4

I take shots at white knights and other anti-male advocates. Sue me. You are an idiot and a sycophant of ignatiusloyola: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ou4ao/drinkthebleach_defines_masculinity_as_chop_wood/c3k27dp?context=10
/r/MensRights04/03/12 05:08 AM
0

It has already been done. ignatiusloyola has turned this into a place where MRAs are harassed and feminists are welcomed. Example 2 I warned you about it before, but you ignored me. You reap what you sow.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 01:34 AM
-5

So if someone posted about how they were the victims of false claims of domestic violence, and someone said "go beat her for real". That's an extremely silly thing to ban for. Who cares? You guys need to be banning anti-male, anti-men's rights feminist trolls, not worry about people saying things like that that are irrelevant. You should also ban drinkthebleach for attempting to use state violence against me, which is a far more serious thing: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ohohb/un…
/r/MensRights04/03/12 01:24 AM
3

Thanks Paul, and you're right: We need more places where misandry is not tolerated. This used to be one of them.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 01:07 AM
-3

Again, your action was to threaten me with state violence.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 12:57 AM
-1

Hey, I agree with Hamakua on something.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 12:24 AM
4

No, though I think you're wrong on a couple things, it's clear your intentions are to make things better for men. Trolls are here primarily to fight against men's rights.
/r/MensRights04/03/12 12:08 AM
-4

I've made no threatening messages to anyone. On the other hand, you've threatened me with state violence. Calling the police was an action. Attempting to get them to use state violence against me was a threat, a threat of violence.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 11:51 PM
-3

And I never should have. The mod policy should be used to ban anti-male, anti-men's rights trolls, not MRAs. The goal of moderators should be to make this place open to rational discussion of men's rights issues, not to make this place a safe haven for feminist trolls, as it currently is.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 11:39 PM
-3

Keep throwing out lies and accusations, it'll get you up-votes but it won't make you an MRA. I accept criticism from actual MRAs, but not you. edit: Why is the guy doesn't believe there's a MRM claiming I'm not an MRA? The cognitive dissonance is palpable.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 11:28 PM
-1

Just ban them when you see them and our problems go away within weeks. They don't need warnings or temp bans, they need permanent and immediate bans.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 11:18 PM
5

As I previously told you, I've donated over a thousand dollars to many different men's rights websites over the last year, I've written and edited articles, posted flyers, and assisted MRAs in many other ways behind the scenes. I'm not sure I'd still call myself an MRA now though because I haven't done much in the way of activism in a few months, other than trying to maintain this sub-reddit as a place for MRAs, not a place for feminists and concern trolls, but it seems I've lost that battle. Th…
/r/MensRights03/03/12 11:06 PM
7

Yes, ignatius dismissed it because he doesn't like me. I'm aware of that.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 10:56 PM
2

Banning trolls like you would prove that this place welcomes MRAs and does not take kindly to feminist trolls like you who spend all their time shitting up threads by harassing MRAs and down-voting good comments. Considering men's rights is a minority view and there are a huge number of trolls like you who seek to censor us and attack us, banning you trolls is the only proper course to keep this place free for MRAs to discuss topics. There's absolutely no reason we should give "free speech" to a…
/r/MensRights03/03/12 10:44 PM
4

These are non-issues. It's more important to ban feminist trolls like litchitea, NiceGuysSTFU, Badass, etc., because currently feminists are MORE WELCOME here than actual men's rights activists. Once you've banned all the feminist trolls, then these other issues can be discussed. A sub-reddit where feminists are more welcome than MRAs is a men's rights sub-reddit in name alone. But as long as you're going to ban violent comments, please start by banning drinkthebleach, because he attempted to us…
/r/MensRights03/03/12 10:33 PM
3

Better yet, if you and all the prolific feminist trolls like you were banned we wouldn't need to worry about this issue anymore. But when the head moderator welcomes feminists and harasses MRAs, it becomes clear why you're not banned. ignatiusloyola likes the work you're doing to make this place feminist-friendly and anti-MRA.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 10:20 PM
2

You should be just as concerned as I am when this sub-reddit is more welcoming to feminists than MRAs, when rational men's rights activists are down-voted and feminists are up-voted. Unless you're a feminist yourself, hm? If I see misandric lies perpetuated in this sub-reddit, I will point them out whenever I see fit, even though you feel the need to harass me in defense of feminists every single time. And when I do share such links, MRAs have an opportunity to share their views which were censo…
/r/MensRights03/03/12 10:10 PM
3

A sub-reddit where MRAs are down-voted and feminists are up-voted, where feminists are more welcome than MRAs, where even the head moderator is more welcoming to feminists than actual men's rights activists, is a men's rights sub-reddit in name only.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 10:00 PM
2

Lol thanks I usually get it right but sadly the beer dulled my wits.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 09:42 PM
-12

It's not misogyny if it's true anymore than it's misandry if it's true.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 09:29 PM
1

Oh please, you get most black people together and they are loud as hell. My black fiancee would tell you the same damn thing.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 09:18 PM
-4

Text cannot be "angry".
/r/MensRights03/03/12 08:58 PM
2

I never crossed the line; the only crime I committed was correctly calling out the many offenses of ignatiusloyola, which are far more dire than mine, and you know this. NiceGuysSTFU needs a permanent ban, as do lichitea, QwestionEveryPost, and misseff.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 05:37 AM
5

didn't the women use their superior emotional and verbals skills to 'talk' about the issues until the shelters built themselves? Ahahahaha. The women's tribe, Jaburu, wearing yellow, were able to work better together, and they got off to an early winning streak, winning the first 4 of 5 challenges. However, their camplife suffered tremendously, as they spent almost the entire first week without a shelter. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Survivor:_The_Amazon In other words, the men were superior, bu…
/r/MensRights03/03/12 05:27 AM
2

Whose alt are you, little troll? Who's little troll alt? PS What have you done for the men's rights movement? I've donated money, written articles, edited, posted flyers, what have you done, little troll alt? Whose alt are you, troll?
/r/MensRights03/03/12 05:17 AM
1

He's talking about me, little feminist pcarvious.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 05:06 AM
5

itt: people who don't realize that it doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 04:26 AM
1

Here's my latest post, detailing how boys suffer from suicide two to three times more than they should because of their mothers who choose to divorce: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/qf0dp/sons_of_divorce_fare_worse_than_daughters_a_new/ When are they going to ban you trolls who never contribute anything and harass MRAs, little 21-day old troll who's never done anything but concern troll here? Who's alt are you?
/r/MensRights03/03/12 03:46 AM
1

Says the troll.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 03:36 AM
-12

"I don't know enough about the OP's situation to comment on whether his parents' divorce settlement is atrocious" he works two jobs so he can pay for the divorce settlement She complained that she was 'getting screwed' and she only really let the trial period work because she figured either the eventual ruling would make her my primary custodian or that I would just get sick of living with my dad. That's enough to know, little feminist concern troll. What she does is evil. Yes, EVIL. And the son…
/r/MensRights03/03/12 03:20 AM
0

r/MR concern troll: http://i.imgur.com/IwrbA.png guys, guys, guys, I'm REALLY CONCERNED where this discussion is leading and how it MAKES US LOOK as a GROUP. The more you mirror non-controversial opinions the more liked you will be.. blah blah You like to lie about what a concern troll is, just like ignatiusloyola. Congratulations on being one of his cronies, little man.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 03:09 AM
-4

Indeed. That's the truth of it, and whether we like it or not makes no difference. We must be the change we desire. We must show that we are not willing to tolerate misandry, even from those we may love.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 02:24 AM
0

Oh shush. Go NAWALT elsewhere.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 02:06 AM
-7

Duh
/r/MensRights03/03/12 12:30 AM
0

There's definitely something to be said that women getting educated empowering them more. Usually it just makes them more demanding (hypergamy) and more likely to call themselves "independent" while leeching off men. That's not the type of "empowerment" that's good for anyone, especially children.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 12:13 AM
3

And you see why I think we were better off in the past. At least the world was more real. Today's word is an absurdity. We're living in Harrison Bergeron's world.
/r/MensRights03/03/12 12:03 AM
0

I am not familiar enough with history to state that feminism is intrinsic to Leftism, though I think it's highly unlikely that a Leftist state can go along for very long without relying on it, that feminism is one of the most effective tools Leftists have at their disposable to keep the system running for a little longer.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 11:52 PM
0

This is what happens when you have a Leftist police state. The only solution is to fight against Leftism.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 11:42 PM
18

That won't work. I've got a better idea. Make it really personal. Tell her if she doesn't treat your father better you'll never forgive her, and you guarantee she won't ever see you when you're older, and she'll die alone and unloved. Tell her it's not fair that your father has to work two jobs to support her with his money, that she's killing him just so she can be comfortable. Tell her you're tired of being the adult in this situation, and if she doesn't start acting like an adult soon she's g…
/r/MensRights02/03/12 11:32 PM
6

You're right, male suicide is not a men's rights issue. Only a troll would post an article examining the causes of male suicide. /s
/r/MensRights02/03/12 11:21 PM
1

Ooh you got down-voted by the Leftist/feminist down-vote brigade. There was a similar post here which fell victim to the same Leftist/feminist bullshit: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/qdchx/does_anybody_else_think_its_unfair_that_we_should/ Feminist Leftists don't need logic when they have a down-vote button and feelings.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 11:11 PM
1

Sure, overall the post has a net positive effect, but if he maintains these delusions he won't have a positive effect on the movement in the long run. Also this post is drivel compared to many other posts that should be at the top of this sub-reddit. Meanwhile, feminists who now dominate this sub-reddit are down-voting threads like this which relate to the effect that children's movies have on boys. And people here are claiming that the media our children are exposed to, which is partly responsi…
/r/MensRights02/03/12 11:01 PM
-4

Oh please, drink some fucking chamomile tea, ginger root tea, take some Lugol's, and bitches won't have cramps. My fiancee used to have terrible cramps, I'd know. If you're too stupid to do that, take some fucking Advil, it has fewer side effects. Besides, most women on BC are doing it to stop pregnancy, spare me the bullshit 10%-of-the-time oh-the-poor-wimminz excuses, stupid feminist. The push for funding birth control is entirely based on the idea that women need it to prevent pregnancy, any …
/r/MensRights02/03/12 10:51 PM
-8

I am not against feminism. Lol.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 10:31 PM
-1

So you think there's something wrong with women doing crotcheting, doing laundry, and cleaning the kitchen? I'm tired of you Lefties whining when women CHOOSE traditional roles. Get off your high horse and stop forcing women into the roles you want for them, misogynist. You're a politically correct moron and a useful idiot for feminists, not an MRA.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 10:03 PM
-1

Children's movies are not just for entertainment but to teach lessons. And when the lessons taught are bad ones, it affects children. That's why this is an important topic. I'll check those movies out, thanks.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 09:47 PM
-6

Use "he" unless there's some good reason to use "she". For example, she worked on her crocheting before doing the laundry and cleaning the kitchen.
/r/MensRights02/03/12 07:19 AM
-9

Misseff, I had a lot of sex in my younger days and I came down with a very painful venereal disease because of it. I demand you send me $50 a month to pay for my medication so that I need not suffer. Checks payable to JeremiahMRA.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 10:37 PM
-1

Wow lots of feminists in this thread.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 09:52 PM
-5

And boy would the lyrics of My Own Home upset feminists: Father's hunting in the forest Mother's cooking in the home I must go to fetch the water 'Til the day that I'm grown 'Til I'm grown, 'til I'm grown I must go to fetch the water 'Til the day that I'm grown Then I will have a handsome husband And a daughter of my own And I'll send her to fetch the water I'll be cooking in the home Then I'll send her to fetch the water I'll be cooking in the home
/r/MensRights01/03/12 09:48 PM
6

All you ever do here is excuse women for their bad behavior. I'm saving this link for the next time you claim you're not a feminist concern troll.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 09:32 PM
-3

the situation is very very similar to 1930 Germany, one group discriminates openly against the other group that just takes it because it feels guilty of something. That's socialism for ya.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 09:22 PM
1

Not everyone who disagrees with me is a mangina anti-male troll, but you are. :) By the way, I have a question for you. What have you done for the men's rights movement? And let's just say that trolling this sub-reddit and harassing MRAs doesn't count. Other than that brilliant work, what have you done?
/r/MensRights01/03/12 09:07 PM
0

If all he did was whine about it on Reddit, without ever doing any activism or donating money, clearly he's not an MRA. Remember, dumbass, money OR activism. Like me, I've donated, I've written articles, edited for men's rights sites, raised awareness on misandric articles, posted flyers, etc. You on the other hand just troll /r/mensrights to try to shut actual MRAs up. You're not an MRA, that much is clear. And no, claiming you "care about men" while doing nothing about it, and even intentional…
/r/MensRights01/03/12 09:05 PM
1

Sigi, I'm disappointed you went full retard again. Just because YOUR answer to every problem is big government doesn't mean the answer to every problem is big government. We didn't need big government in the past, we don't need it now. You need to read up on your history instead of spending time on Reddit. Seriously, we were having a fine conversation then you had to be an asshole again and spew some bullshit you know isn't true. Stop doing that, Eoghan. Give respect and you'll get respect. You …
/r/MensRights01/03/12 08:59 PM
0

Did feminists claiming to "care about men" help the men's movement ever? No. Action and money are what matter, not trolls like you who do absolutely nothing for the men's movement.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 08:53 PM
-2

Isn't it funny how ignatiusloyola just said "rights are what society agrees to" and therefore men's rights issues don't exist because society already agrees men don't have certain rights. He's a big-government-loving extreme socialist, and not a men's rights activist. Biggest troll in this sub-reddit, and he's the moderator.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 08:41 PM
-5

YES they're forcing everyone to pay for sluts' birth control in the form of insurance premiums, and like Indog said they're going to need government bureaucracy paid for by the taxpayer to enforce it. Indog shows quite well why conservatism is the dominant ideology of most men's rights activists: because big, powerful government is the primary enforcer of misandry.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 08:31 PM
-3

Troll.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 08:21 PM
-2

QwestionEveryPost still remains unbanned although he has been a completely obvious troll for the past month and a half, at least. You remain unbanned although you've been an obvious anti-male feminist troll for months upon months. Obvious to anyone with a brain at least. And yes, the best strategy is to ban the anti-male trolls. ignatiusloyola doesn't do it because he's an anti-male troll himself, probably (edit: definitely) the biggest troll in this sub-reddit. You and he agree on a lot, becaus…
/r/MensRights01/03/12 06:20 AM
0

Women have never been in servitude to men. In a traditional society, women got protection and food, and men got pussy and a family. Men and women had a decently fair trade, at least as fair as possible. Slavery for all but a few is not a fair trade.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 06:09 AM
1

I'm still waiting to hear how much you donated to the men's movement in the last year.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 06:07 AM
1

Lol, I'm not a real engineer now? Thanks. I am of course a real MRA. You, on the other hand, I doubt it. How much have you donated to the movement in the last year? By the way, I am well aware that there are a few retarded liberals who are engineers. Most of them are HUGE manginas though. Several of the project managers are like that. OH WAIT, that's what you are. Because all project managers have to do is be quite intelligent, and be huge manginas who have no balls of their own, and are willing…
/r/MensRights01/03/12 04:19 AM
-8

What the fuck do you mean you don't "use GPA" anyway? Explain this to me. Is that really how Leftist you fuckers are, that you can't hurt anyone's feelings? How do you determine that you're in the top 7% then? It was 20 years ago and doesn't matter anyway because experience means everything. Maybe. What really matters is the degree to get you there in the first place. Judging by what I've seen of you, you aren't that smart. Hey, what kind of "engineering" do you do by the way? One that doesn't r…
/r/MensRights01/03/12 03:53 AM
0

Indeed.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 03:52 AM
-10

I do real engineering that affects the life and safety of real people. Lol, so was I, retard. I worked in a chemical engineering plant. top 7% Well that's too bad. I'm sorry you couldn't do better.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 03:52 AM
-3

I'm starting to see where some of these liberals come from. They hate that they weren't at the top ever in their lives, and so they think the world owes them something, and that they need the government to step in and give them handouts to make up for their impotence. Sad, really. Perhaps that's why I'm not a liberal? Because I'm too smart. Which was the whole point of this thread anyway. Engineers are too smart, too good, to be "liberals". QED
/r/MensRights01/03/12 03:47 AM
-1

Yeah, I specialize in engineering that demands one to be extremely logical. Therefore I am illogical. Idiot.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 03:45 AM
-6

It's nice to live in a world where 2+2=4. Also I haven't coded in about a year. I quit my job, wasn't all that satisfying.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 03:44 AM
-4

Software engineer. GPA please. Above 3.9/4.0 here. Would've been higher if I hadn't been stuck with retards in a few of my groups. Getting As on individual work and Cs on group work when your group doesn't step up never helps. Though I admit, sleeping through some of my physics lab exams didn't help either lol. Fuck 8 AM classes!
/r/MensRights01/03/12 03:42 AM
-5

Software.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 03:36 AM
-7

Your games bore me.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 03:31 AM
-3

An honors degree means that I took 48 credits rather than 40. First class means that I graduated with a cumulative average above 80% from a prestigious engineering university. Pfft. 80%? I graduated with above a 3.9/4.0 GPA at a top 10 engineering university, well above EIGHTY fucking percent. What was your GPA? There's a big difference between the 99th percentile, where I've always been since childhood, and the 80%. I still think you're an idiot. I really care what an idiot thinks about my inte…
/r/MensRights01/03/12 03:31 AM
-5

I did not say they were completely useless. Try to ask an honest question and you'll get an honest answer.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 03:28 AM
-5

What can you do when /r/mensrights is dominated by feminists, manginas, and trolls like you? It's a badge of honor, really. Keep in mind I'm still at 4300 submission karma and 250 comment karma. I actually would have quite a bit more comment karma if every thread where I was heavily up-voted wasn't swarmed by SRS trolls later to down-vote me. But I really don't care at all for karma.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 03:26 AM
-3

I guess you haven't been paying attention. :) Also that isn't even relevant. As I said, just because you are at this sub-reddit doesn't make you an MRA. There lies your answer.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 03:24 AM
-6

Are you aware of the concept of a normative statement?
/r/MensRights01/03/12 03:20 AM
-5

I focus on things that matter to me. Everything else bites the dust.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 03:20 AM
-2

A few MRAs aren't very conservative. Not many. Just because you troll this sub-reddit doesn't make you an MRA, big guy.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 03:17 AM
-4

This sums it up: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UrIiLvg58SY&ob=av2e
/r/MensRights01/03/12 03:11 AM
-9

My superiority is showing.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 03:09 AM
-7

Well I'm sorry you aren't smart enough or have the time enough to realize that Leftism is an enemy to men's rights. Perhaps if you lose your job or actually become a men's rights activist instead of just a whiner who doesn't care about results, you'll take the time to do the research I have in this area instead of just spouting bullshit like a fool. What is "first class with an honors degree"? Is that kind of like me with my summa cum laude?
/r/MensRights01/03/12 03:08 AM
-8

Scientists TODAY are mostly blowhards who rely on a piece of paper, their degree, to get ahead in the world, whether in academia or the workplace. They may know the theory, but most have no idea how to apply it, and that's why they waste taxpayer money on worthless exercises. On the other hand, engineers got the fuck out of the boring ass wrote memorization and brown-nosing of academia and CREATED things based on the knowledge they gleaned. So that's the difference. The scientists you're talking…
/r/MensRights01/03/12 03:01 AM
-6

They can be interesting, but most people who major in such things are fools.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 02:58 AM
-6

Why can't you accept that there is a substantial number of people in the Men's Rights Movement who are not conservative? Um, because it's not true? Why do you have to keep trying to create differences where there needn't be any? I didn't create any differences, I pointed them out. And those who seek solutions should care. You're just a whiner who doesn't actually intend to solve any problems except one: male genital mutilation. So you aren't an MRA.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 02:58 AM
-7

Pfft you're a Leftie who calls himself a libertarian. And of course, considering this is a forum dominated by Leftie idiots, I would expect that many of those Leftie retards are engineers. By the way, what the fuck is an engineering consultant? Sounds like a desk job for a paper pusher to me. Engineer.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 02:57 AM
-9

Says the SRS troll. http://www.reddit.com/r/SRSMeta/comments/q5phg/can_we_get_another_no_rmensrights_month/c3v8d74
/r/MensRights01/03/12 02:51 AM
-4

Pfft, spare me your BS. As I said, government-enforced transfer of wealth is not altruism. If people want to give to others of their own free will, that's fine. Government-enforced transfer of wealth just creates a moral hazard. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_hazard Voluntary charity creates MUCH less of a moral hazard because it is not guaranteed.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 02:48 AM
-11

CIRCUMCISION CIRCUMCISION CIRCUMCISION THAT'S ALL YOU CARE ABOUT. Aka you're an idiot.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 02:47 AM
-9

I've done engineering, not just "science". And every word I've said is true.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 02:46 AM
-13

Of course "scientists" (men who weren't good enough to actually be engineers, and rely on government grants to do useless work in higher educational institutions) would be more liberal. They REQUIRE big government for their paychecks, and they weren't smart enough to actually have a real career where they create new things. Mostly what they do is useless research, while men like Mark Zuckerberg actually CREATE things outside of government-funded educational institutions. You know, ENGINEERS.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 02:44 AM
-1

Government-enforced transfer of wealth is not altruism. PS they really haven't banned you yet? Lol, fools.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 02:36 AM
-10

TIL's require support. Ask an engineer who works with engineers at a Fortune 500 company, like I did. I really doubt that you're an engineer. Summa cum laude baby. And I'm not writing a paper, I'm posting on Reddit. Kindly troll elsewhere. evidence No, just links. I was thinking last night about how Lefties like to claim conservatives are dumb. Then, being an engineer, I considered all the people I've met who are also engineers, and especially those I worked with. Most of them, especially the re…
/r/MensRights01/03/12 02:32 AM
0

Shouldn't you rather be looking at economics (and arguably sociology) majors than engineering for the more educated political views? No. Economics majors are indoctrinated into Leftist Keynesian economics, which do not make any sense. As an engineer, Austrian economics make quite a bit more sense. I took a few economics classes as an engineer. The low level class I took pass/fail and only attended 1/3 of the classes. I passed. The senior level class I took was all lecture, no book, no homework, …
/r/MensRights01/03/12 02:24 AM
-9

I did not cite it as evidence. Perhaps if you'd been an engineer, you would have realized that.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 02:19 AM
-6

Well put. Beer speak: As a summa cum laude engineer, I sure am right a lot. At least in college I had professors who were fairly objective grading me, rather than a bunch of Leftist fools grading me as they do here, based on their feelings.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 02:15 AM
2

Easy choice isn't? Thank you big government socialism.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 02:04 AM
-3

Oh yes it is. Pragmatism is the heart of the men's rights movement, as we fight against politically correct lies that promote misandry. As some of the most pragmatic and intelligent of individuals, engineers are dominated by conservatives and libertarians, who also are pragmatic. This runs in counter to the typical liberal argument that liberals are smarter because most college-educated individuals are liberal. Turns out most college-educated individuals aren't actually that smart. But engineers…
/r/MensRights01/03/12 01:44 AM
0

Oh, so you're arguing semantics. Feminism utilizes class warfare of the supposed victim class, women, against the supposed oppressor class, men, based on patriarchy theory. Feminism is and always has been Leftist/socialist in nature. And by socialist, I mean socialism in practice, with the state utilized by women against men, not theoretical stateless socialism which cannot exist.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 01:37 AM
11

Well that's just the thing. We have NOT progressed. In what way have we progressed? Not in the ways that matter. We have a country of broken homes where freedom is a fairy tale and the people live in fear of the state.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 01:26 AM
0

No, that's me expressing the absurdity of your statement. Feminism is intrinsic to Leftism (Marxism). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yfdKWyzZPQ0
/r/MensRights01/03/12 01:05 AM
1

Feminism has divorced itself from Marxism long ago. Ho ho ho ho ho.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 12:53 AM
1

This place seems like the mangina's version of Game.
/r/seduction01/03/12 12:45 AM
0

Really Celda, this whole idea of copy-pasting people's self-posts is a bad one. It does more harm than good by being unwelcoming to newcomers.
/r/MensRights01/03/12 12:43 AM
-1

Yes, ask big daddy to take away women's vote you and control the riots that follow. You think we'd ask? No, men don't ask, they tell. And with enough strong men to lead, women and other men follow. The right in american want a corporatist healthcare system. They also tend to vote for less tax for the rich. So either way you are getting corporatism. There are some truths in there and some misconceptions. What I'll say is that government encourages and enables corporations to do evil things while …
/r/MensRights01/03/12 12:01 AM
2

I probably would have agreed with you three years ago, but with all the information I've had at my disposal I cannot draw the same conclusion. Men and women are different and they always will be, unless you find a way to make growing human beings in vats more economically feasible than growing them in women, like in some Brave New World, which won't happen, men will always be more disposable than women. And everything else follows from that. Also note that if men don't have women and children to…
/r/MensRights29/02/12 11:50 PM
0

Men's suffrage leads to women's suffrage so men's suffrage must be the root cause of misandry, oh nose! Perhaps if men are aware of women's flaws and learn to avoid this silly idea of "equality" then men's suffrage won't lead to women's suffrage. After all, men used to know this. Leftism made them forget. Yes, Americans are brainwashed to vote against their best interests and in the interests of corporations and the super rich: that's what Leftism was designed to do, after all. In fact, Leftism …
/r/MensRights29/02/12 11:34 PM
0

In other words you are saying that women are the sex who wants to be provided for and votes for themselves, and that this proves that women's suffrage leads only to misandry. Finally you see the light.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 10:48 PM
1

Oh and as far as solutions go, I'm talking about something along these lines: http://dicipres.wordpress.com/2012/02/08/the-evolving-western-matriarchy/ We need to reach to young men today and guide them in a way that no politically current school curriculum can. Now the reason ignatiusloyola and the other anti-male PC trolls bug me is that they ensure that sentiments like these are quickly down-voted into oblivion and trolled heavily so that many people will not see them or if they do they'll ig…
/r/MensRights29/02/12 10:33 PM
2

Keep posting, man. There are a lot of feminists and manginas here who down-vote stuff like this.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 10:23 PM
2

Excellent post, Demonspawn. You should really just create a blogspot blog and copy-paste things like this posts as articles. And this: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/oxcbn/on_the_misunderstood_reasons_why_feminism_is/c3ksuzt Or submit to The Spearhead or AVfM. Is this misogynist to have these beliefs? No. It is realistic to recognize the differences between the gender which reproduces and is vulnerable (and therefore needs to be helped during her service to the next generation) and …
/r/MensRights29/02/12 09:42 PM
1

Yeah I was also quite vague when it comes to solutions. It has a lot to do with masculinity. Men need to re-learn what it means to be masculine because masculinity is healthy and productive. Our culture has been outrageously feminized so much that men don't know who they ought to be, and they can't be happy like that. Many men are missing something important these days. I'll check out your reply to Demonspawn. This post I made should make it clear where I'm coming from. The only way to fix these…
/r/MensRights29/02/12 09:31 PM
-4

The MRM wasn't taken seriously until people like Uncle Elmer and real MRAs started pushing people's buttons and getting them out of their comfort zone. People like you are nothing but concern trolls and more harmful to the movement than feminists. guys, guys, guys, I'm REALLY CONCERNED where this discussion is leading and how it MAKES US LOOK as a GROUP. The more you mirror non-controversial opinions the more liked you will be.. blah blah That path hasn't worked for 30 years, so please shut up a…
/r/MensRights29/02/12 08:38 PM
-4

You know, I'm still waiting for someone to actually critique the article content rather than just throwing out ad hominem attacks against the author and me. That's what distinguishes MRAs from the do-nothing whiners: MRAs talk about facts while the do-nothing inactivists (just like feminists) respond emotionally and worry incessantly about being politically correct. The posters here thus far sound much more like feminists than MRAs. Perhaps some of you should venture out and learn what the men's…
/r/MensRights29/02/12 08:28 PM
-9

Women have a hard time understanding this due to their solipsism: Not everything is about you, sonja. Traditional family structures work far better and are far more fair to both sexes, for most people, than today's antagonistic family structure where the woman has all the power and the man has none other than what she grants him. If you hadn't noticed yet, we've got a near 50% divorce rate and I believe single motherhood is over 50%? This is terrible for children, for fathers, and for mothers as…
/r/MensRights29/02/12 08:16 PM
-7

Actually Uncle Elmer is an MRA, probably far more than you'll ever be. If the choice is between stable relationships and intact families OR entitled bitches and broken homes, and it is, I'll choose the first every time. Stop trying to force people into behaving in a way that agrees with your ideology.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 08:06 PM
1

The end result of "equality" the Leftists claim they want: privilege for women and all other supposed "victim" classes.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 08:24 AM
3

I'm saying it's a discussion worth having. But as you can see, the ideologues do not want to have that discussion at all. Instead they'd prefer to spread lies to shut down the discussion before it begins. Of course men's willingness to spoil women is a problem. After all women's suffrage was granted by men. Men's and women's nature is something to contend with. So is the culture itself, which is a reflection of the worst parts of human nature. Traditional cultures worked to keep things stable an…
/r/MensRights29/02/12 04:50 AM
0

Still waiting for an answer to my query. What have you done for the men's rights movement, ignatius? And let's just say that trolling your own sub-reddit and forcing MRAs out of it doesn't count. Other than that brilliant work, what have you done?
/r/MensRights29/02/12 04:35 AM
0

Pointing out enemies to men's rights is far from immature.
/r/MensRights29/02/12 04:30 AM
1

Certainly a genius such as yourself understands the difference between "most" and "every", oh wise and incorruptible one?
/r/MensRights29/02/12 04:23 AM
-4

In my mind, the men's rights movement should recognize that women's suffrage causes most men's rights issues and find a way to deal with it.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 11:26 PM
0

Did I say I would kick elitez ass? No. I have no internet tough guy problem. What I said was that I dare him to say that to the face of a father's rights activist. I don't consider myself a father's rights activist, I consider the guys at Fathers & Families father's rights activists, I consider WF Price at The Spearhead a father's rights activist, and I know that elitez is too much of a coward to say something so shitty to a father's face.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 11:25 PM
-1

Yeah, that's why I'm with her. All the white nationalists are doing it. It's the in thing to do.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:33 PM
-2

Please provide proof I said that. Thanks!
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:32 PM
0

Proof please.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:30 PM
-1

Maybe you should try to stop lying about what was said. Seems like a bigger issue to me. All the context is provided here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/q9fjn/i_just_wanted_to_say_that_i_think_this_subreddit/c3vvxnv elitez never once said "traditional family".
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:28 PM
-3

Lol, I'm in Texas right now. Are you gonna beat me up? That'll show those father's rights activists, always complaining about their children being stolen and their families being destroyed!
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:27 PM
-1

Says the guy who's not an MRA. What have you done for the men's rights movement, ignatius? And let's just say that trolling your own sub-reddit and forcing MRAs out of it doesn't count. Other than that brilliant work, what have you done?
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:24 PM
-1

No, that is NOT what the quote means. He made a blanket statement that the destruction of the family is not a men's rights issue. All the context is provided here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/q9fjn/i_just_wanted_to_say_that_i_think_this_subreddit/c3vvxnv elitez never once said "traditional family".
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:22 PM
-1

So he claimed, after the fact. The context does not show what you think it shows.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:20 PM
2

History. Clever.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:18 PM
-2

I've donated to Fathers & Families, SAVE Services, A Voice for Men, Male Studies, Men's Activism, and many others. Still waiting for you to describe your activism. How much have you donated, again?
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:16 PM
-1

What is a disablist bigot? So which racial groups am I supposed to hate now? I wasn't aware I hated anyone based on race. I kind of like the whole idea of people earning their place based on merit regardless of race, dontchaknow.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:14 PM
0

It's nice that even the moderator here, ignatiusloyola, is doing it: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/q9fjn/i_just_wanted_to_say_that_i_think_this_subreddit/c3vxx0f?context=3 I remember a time when kloo2yoo would ban people for serious lies like this.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:12 PM
-2

Donated over a thousand dollars to various men's rights, father's rights, and anti-domestic violence groups in the last year even though I'm now living off my savings, written articles, edited for a major men's rights site, posted flyers, submitted links here, spread the message of men's rights in the comments of misandric articles, given advice to MRAs at some of the biggest men's rights sites which has helped to grow them. Gee, nothing really.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:10 PM
-6

It is important. There is a culture here of people who say this kind of shit and don't think it matters. The culture is what's important, and elitez demonstrates it well. I will point out a bigot every time I see one. Thanks for your concern trolling though. Oh my god, now I have to make a post and try to divert everyone's attention away from real issues(like the disintegration of the family and how it affects boys and men) to create a witch hunt to attack this one person. Are you retarded? This…
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:06 PM
-1

Different focuses? He just spit on every father's right activist. This isn't a squabble, this is important. And go back to worrying about the only issue you EVER talk about, circumcision. Some of us are MRAs who actually care about ALL men's rights issues, and don't like it when people make light of them. Something tells me if someone went around saying CIRCUMCISION ISN'T A MEN'S RIGHTS ISSUE, you'd have a fucking problem with it. Now realize that father's rights are probably THE MOST IMPORTANT …
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:03 PM
-2

Lol, can you tell me why a white nationalist is engaged to a black woman, retard?
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:02 PM
-1

You have an interesting idea of what a men's rights issue is, which just about every single actual men's rights activist I've ever heard of would disagree with. Perhaps you aren't a men's rights activist, then? That might explain it. Can I ask you what men's rights activism you've done this year? How much money you've donated to the movement? What articles you've written? How many flyers you've posted? Do you consider yourself an MRA? Because I find it hard to believe an MRA would say things.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 10:01 PM
-6

I got an actual laugh out of that. Thank you.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:54 PM
1

Backpedal, backpedal.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:50 PM
-2

THE DESTRUCTION OF THE FAMILY IS NOT AN MRA ISSUE. That is what you said. Then you followed up with this: Fathers being forced out of their family is not the same as families being destroyed. And I say again, I dare you to tell that to a father's rights activist's face.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:49 PM
-4

In other words, the destruction of the family IS an MRA issue. PS destroying the family unit means millions of boys grow up with single mothers and are at vastly increased chances of prison, early death, depression, etc. But I guess that isn't a men's rights issue. :/
/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:45 PM
-2

Fathers being forced out of their family is not the same as families being destroyed. WHAT?? Say that to a father's rights activist's face, I dare you.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:43 PM
0

Oh, I'm quite chill, OThomson. Since you seem very interested in this topic, what do you think of this statement? THE DESTRUCTION OF THE FAMILY IS NOT AN MRA ISSUE. Do you agree?
/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:40 PM
-3

Yes, I provided the context in the OP. Why are you posting this? The context doesn't change the statement's meaning at all. You can't be anymore clear than this: THE DESTRUCTION OF THE FAMILY IS NOT AN MRA ISSUE.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:39 PM
-1

It's word for word: THE DESTRUCTION OF THE FAMILY IS NOT AN MRA ISSUE. I provided a link to the context, so I don't know why you're postulating theories when the evidence is already there, unless you're intentionally trying to derail. And the context is irrelevant when it comes to that statement. It doesn't change the meaning at all. There's is no weaseling out of what he stated. It's pretty clear. "THE DESTRUCTION OF THE FAMILY IS NOT AN MRA ISSUE." -elitez
/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:36 PM
1

THE DESTRUCTION OF THE FAMILY IS NOT AN MRA ISSUE. By the way, I dare you to tell that to Fathers & Families and the millions of men who had their rights to their children taken away from them by women and the state because of people like you who just don't give a fuck, you heartless bastard.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 09:25 PM
-3

Gee I thought the state stealing fathers' children away from them and forcing them to pay their ex-wives money on penalty of getting raped in prison was a men's rights issue. I thought the spread of feminism over the last 100 years to remove the rights of men and grant women special privileges, resulting in boys falling way behind in school, skyrocketing rates of male suicide, skyrocketing rates of domestic violence against males, etc. were men's rights issues. All these issues are caused direct…
/r/MensRights28/02/12 08:59 PM
1

Actually it did, and still does in some communities. No one says things were perfect, but they were much better than this in the most important ways.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 08:48 PM
-7

Oh so I'm a fucktard because as an MRA I discuss how women's suffrage necessarily leads to the welfare state, widespread single motherhood, the destruction of the family, and pretty much every other men's rights issue? You're right, only a fucktard would discuss the causes of our problems. I must hate women! Misogyny!!!
/r/MensRights28/02/12 08:38 PM
-4

Oh it's a male-friendly place if you're a particular type of male: Leftist, politically correct, deferential to women. ignatiusloyola has ensured that other men, even men's rights activists, are not welcome here because they disagree with his ideology. But that's not surprising because ignatiusloyola isn't an MRA himself, he's just an ideologue who likes control. Ignatiusloyola literally welcomes feminists and literally harasses and pushes away men's rights activists. He is no ally to the men's …
/r/MensRights28/02/12 08:21 PM
-4

Thank you for your post, NotThatKingOfGirl. My number one priority is to address the concerns of feminists. After all, they have done so much for men in the past. The men's movement greatest successes have always been the result of catering to the wishes of feminists and other politically correct ideologues. /s
/r/MensRights28/02/12 08:11 PM
-19

When shit comes out of a person's mouth 9 times out of 10, one learns to quickly skim to get the gist of it. I know you enjoy spending all this time trolling MRAs, but that's because you're not an MRA. Shouldn't you be getting back to your thesis? I thought that was why you didn't have five minutes a day to ban trolls before? Though it's odd, you seem to have the time to troll MRAs every chance you get, behind their backs. Yet when they respond to your trolling, you always seem to run away.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 08:01 PM
-18

There ignatius goes again, stirring up shit. And now I'm a white nationalist? Lol. Just another example of ignatiusloyola trolling his own sub-reddit and spreading lies about MRAs, while always claiming he's the innocent victim. Each few days or so they pick a new topic, and you will see recycled, generic arguments on that topic (almost seeming rehearsed arguments) about that point. Then, a new one is picked. Classic case of projection. Look at you. You found a thread where someone's troll alt t…
/r/MensRights28/02/12 07:47 PM
-1

Yes, a condition that trolls use as a slur against intelligent people, which I must say is quite inconsiderate to people who actually have the condition. Thinking on it now, though, ignatiusloyola does seem to meet quite a few of the criteria. I wouldn't label him as such unless it was confirmed he's socially awkward though, which I'm not sure of. He's probably just your average radical Leftie. They share a lot of the same traits but not necessarily the social awkwardness.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 08:57 AM
-1

I was reading this excellent article at inmalafide and when the author mentioned asperger's it made me think of you. So I clicked on your link. The problem seems to be you are confusing high intelligence with asperger's. I have no problems with social interaction, reading social cues, or really any of the other symptoms but high intelligence. Really, it is telling that a slur exists used to insult intelligent people. Smart is the new stupid and stupid is the new smart.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 08:35 AM
1

Well the sad thing is that most people don't realize why it's a big deal and aren't going to bother learning what's really going on with him. And it is actually quite complicated. Without all the pieces of the puzzle, it's really very easy for people to just believe ignatius or think we're all equally to blame. Even with /r/aboutmensrights in place, most people either don't care or just don't have the wit to see what's going on. Linking to individual comments like that really isn't as effective …
/r/MensRights28/02/12 06:39 AM
2

Looks like ignatius is using his typical tactic for when he's losing an argument. Run away and hope everyone forgets (and most users will), then do the same fucking thing next week. He'll harass a bunch of people, claim everybody agrees with his policies and loves him dearly, ignore every dissenter, and when the thread falls off the front page he'll run away and never post in it again. Just like he did in the last moderator thread: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/pz5me/more_new_mods/…
/r/MensRights28/02/12 06:23 AM
-1

Go masturbate to the NDAA.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 12:21 AM
-1

Big government rapes men. Pretty simple, genius.
/r/MensRights28/02/12 12:04 AM
1

Saying you're sorry doesn't change the result of voting for fascists. Do you think fathers who have lost their children and are getting pounded in the ass in prison now because of people like you who think government is the answer to all problems care if you say you're sorry? Your words are meaningless and cowardly. And no, I won't just let it go, because unlike you, I actually do care about what happens to others. I don't just get off claiming I do. Your actions speak louder than words, and the…
/r/MensRights27/02/12 11:43 PM
2

Feminists, like those TJ encountered, are well versed in the art of antagonism and shaming. They know exactly what buttons to push, and they are all too aware of how to ruin a person’s reputation through their reaction to being taunted, thus ending their ability to voice their opinions. It's all explained at /r/AboutMensRights, you know. You attack people and constantly use logical fallacies, then when they respond with attacks in kind, you blame them. TheRealPariah asked you something the other…
/r/MensRights27/02/12 07:59 PM
0

You started with the personal attacks. Like Demonspawn said, when you start losing an argument you tend to get frustrated and start slinging insults. For example: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/m2a8x/im_not_voting_for_obama_because_he_whored_himself/c2xnogc?context=3 That's from 3 months ago. After you repeatedly attack people and they finally respond to your provocation, you then blame them / ban them. Your tactic is well-described in the article: Feminists, like those TJ encounter…
/r/MensRights27/02/12 07:16 PM
2

He reacted just fine to that feminist SRS troll, who was playing the rape card in an attempt to shut down rational discussion.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 07:05 PM
5

If you take issue with a claim, address it legitimately, free of sarcasm and mischaracterizations. Thus we can all come closer to finding the truth of the matter.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 09:56 AM
3

It is therefore my belief that MRAs should mirror libertarianism and classic liberalism, the laissez-fares economists that champion skill over affirmative action, and the responsibility inherent to true individualism.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 01:18 AM
1

You need to eliminate the taxpayer's responsibility for those children as well. In other words, rely on "opt-in" charity rather than forcing people to pay for women's bad decisions. If you do not also eliminate welfare, you merely shift the costs of a single mother's poor choices onto men other than the father.
/r/MensRights27/02/12 12:11 AM
12

You also need to eliminate welfare programs that encourage women to have children they cannot provide for.
/r/MensRights26/02/12 11:57 PM
10

Suggestion: Leave posts that people are banned for up so people can see the evidence, if possible. Not sure if it's showing up as "deleted" because you removed the comment or because he was banned, but it is more satisfying to actually see the troll post someone was banned for, and to see their username in case we've interacted with the troll previously, gives you a greater sense of justice to see the crime as well as the punishment, and also keeps things out in the open.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 08:12 PM
2

Ooh r/politics-style Ron Paul bashing, the lies and ignorance are strong with this one. Everything Paul does is in an effort to limit federal government power as our constitution intended. For example, Sanctity of Life in effect attempts to return the power to the states to legislate abortion, taking it out of the hands of the federal government that enforces one policy on the entire country. Anyone who looks it up on Wikipedia can easily verify this. He also votes against pork but he's clearly …
/r/MensRights24/02/12 08:01 PM
3

Agree. I won't be having children myself, too much to have to protect them from, and don't really want them to be slaves either.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 08:01 PM
1

Dude, the copy-paste shit is a stupid idea that ignatiusloyola suggested. All it does is make people fight newcomers. Why should a new person coming here who makes a self-post have to have some jackass copy-paste his comment and post it in this thread and insinuate they might be trolls? It's insulting and offensive, and it's a stupid policy, as was to be expected coming from ignatiusloyola. It's just another stupid policy that's tearing this sub-reddit apart, causing divisiveness. This is a perf…
/r/MensRights24/02/12 07:51 PM
2

And his religion has very little effect on his political policies: http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=NV68z29OZu4 His politics are libertarian, which means he will not impose his religious beliefs on others. He would let the states decide for themselves rather than forcing everyone in the country through federal government mandates. He also has stated he has bigger things to worry about right now, like putting an end to wars of conquest, auditing the Federal Reserve, and rest…
/r/MensRights24/02/12 07:41 PM
2

Clearly not.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 07:31 PM
2

There is no benefit in relying on a woman to raise your children. If you put your children in the public education system that is exactly what you are doing, allowing a bunch of liberally educated women educate your children in exactly the wrong way, while treating the boys like broken versions of girls. I'd much rather raise children with a wife.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 07:20 PM
2

Nice "rational argument" there. You sound a lot like ignatiusloyola, trolling any MRA that hurts your feelings or dares criticize women. Sorry, but most MRAs realize that western women are generally entitled princesses, dumbass. Educate yourself or keep quiet. SRS and manboobz troll us because they hate men, plain and simple. Stop worrying about MRAs who aren't politically correct enough for your personal tastes (which is exactly what the manboobz and SRS trolls are trying to get you to do) and …
/r/MensRights24/02/12 07:17 PM
1

I thought this was a place where people really could discuss things without being attacked by feminist trolls. It used to be but the head moderator ignatiusloyola is a feminist who encourages trolling against MRAs and has finally succeeded in filling this place with anti-male trolls. I've been fighting it for the better part of a year, but as expected I only managed to stem the tide. The real activists flock to sites like I mentioned anyway. news.mensactivism.org is also good, and inmalafide.com…
/r/MensRights24/02/12 12:05 PM
5

Nothing. What is wrong with you? I would not have a serious long term relationship or even have sex with 99% of western women. I have standards. Most western women are either fat, ugly, old, conceited, selfish, have poor family values, stupid, slutty, or otherwise poor relationship material. I'm sorry if you do not have standards, but please spare me your anti-male shaming because I do. I don't care how many shitty women and white knights I offend. Oh God, I don't want to fuck anything that move…
/r/MensRights24/02/12 11:54 AM
0

Nope, remember you made an edit. edit: overcontrol gave you your answer: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/q3be2/steve_moxon_author_of_the_women_racket_comments/c3ufqok
/r/MensRights24/02/12 04:28 AM
1

What's CH.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 03:14 AM
-4

Brilliant. O_o;;
/r/MensRights24/02/12 03:03 AM
-1

When feminists claimed women are exploited by being prostitutes, little fem-bot.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 02:59 AM
-1

How deep, lol.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 01:09 AM
-1

Nah, that's someone else's job. They can say goo goo ga ga so the babies listen, I'll speak to the adults. That's how any movement works. You'll have "radicals" and "moderates". The problem here is that ignatiusloyola is more a feminist than a moderate, and so he tries to run out all the radicals so this place can be feminist-friendly. A sane r/mensrights moderator would ban the feminist trolls and let the rest of the users, who at least are pro-men's rights, decide what's acceptable. Instead, h…
/r/MensRights24/02/12 01:07 AM
0

No, I correctly summarized ignatiusloyola's viewpoint. He did not correctly summarize mine. And again, simpleton, no one is FORCING a child into any role. Like I said, encouraging is not FORCING.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 01:07 AM
0

Easily solved if the moderators were to just ban the anti-male trolls here.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 12:56 AM
-1

It went over better here before ignatiusloyola welcomed the trolls and feminists here while pushing away genuine MRAs. But yeah, I'm quite blunt, it's modern people's own fault they're overly sensitive and feminine and like to get offended by truths, there's not much I can do about it other than to keep telling the truth and not apologize for it. If I curb my message to cater to their delicate feminine sensibilities, we have already lost.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 12:45 AM
2

Oh I forgot you used a straw man argument as well. Please show me how you get this: No, what you're actually saying is that women are stupid and belong in the kitchen. You're saying the same thing the crazy traditionalist nutjobs who raise people in hickville south USA who beat women say. From this: No, what you're actually saying is it is wrong to encourage (not force) boys to be masculine and girls to be feminine. You're saying the same thing the crazy wackadoo Swedish nutjobs did who tried to…
/r/MensRights24/02/12 12:38 AM
-1

I am thingsarebad. Any points you'd like to argue over? I almost hit a pavlovian response and felt like screaming "misogynist!" If I can do that to you, then I'm doing my job. We must push the boundaries of what's politically correct if we are ever to change anything.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 12:35 AM
1

Ad hominem from the /r/mensrights moderator. Typical.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 12:34 AM
-1

I spit, I don't swallow.
/r/MensRights24/02/12 12:19 AM
0

Because women can be logical and rational, and because men can be emotional and caring, it is morally or ethically wrong to force them to have characteristics that they don't want to have. No, what you're actually saying is it is wrong to encourage (not force) boys to be masculine and girls to be feminine. You're saying the same thing the crazy wackadoo Swedish nutjobs did who tried to raise a boy "gender neutral", which really means, "like a girl". Tradition doesn't make people gendered, realit…
/r/MensRights24/02/12 12:12 AM
5

Pierce, you finally udpated and re-posted the battle of the sexes, you sexy son of a bitch! I still have the damn thing saved on my hard drive from July 10, 2009 from FRS before you deleted the article. :)
/r/MensRights23/02/12 11:53 PM
-1

All I know is that when the TX wildfires happened and were covered in the media here, I never saw a woman firefighter on the TV, but I sure noticed how the media loved to say "men and women" even though there weren't any fucking women risking their lives, just men. It seemed like the local Fox station was better about it, though, I remember there was a ceremony honoring the firefighters and absolutely no women were present, and the journalist actually said MEN, not men and women. The local Fox s…
/r/MensRights23/02/12 11:43 PM
2

Spot on. Yes, r/OneY is a place for women, homosexuals, and men who worship women. DOGA is a submissive male who gets pounded in the ass by a dominatrix, and he hates masculinity. By the way, InfinitelyThristing, misseff, Snooves, NiceGuysSTFU, and pretty much everyone else disagreeing with you are anti-male feminist trolls. They now run this sub-reddit, which is no longer actually a place for men's rights. What you are really discussing is masculinity vs femininity. Feminists HATE that discussi…
/r/MensRights23/02/12 11:21 PM
1

"Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are even incapable of forming such opinions." - Albert Einstein “A sane person to an insane society must appear insane.” - Kurt Vonnegut, Welcome to the Monkey House And yes, I know you're a troll. :)
/r/MensRights23/02/12 11:11 PM
4

This is going to be the mother of your children and the keeper of your house. An Ass-kicker doesn’t need two incomes, he can provide, what he needs is a keeper of home and heart. Two income households leave the raising of their children to expensive day cares and schools, and then mommy goes to work so they can afford to pay for day care and babysitters. Sounds about right. A single income household works much better and allows your children to actually be raised by a family rather than the publ…
/r/MensRights23/02/12 10:41 PM
4

luciansolaris was pointing out that I was being down-voted for an opinion he disagrees with. There are a lot of people who like to go around telling lies about me and down-voting me for no reason, in an attempt to censor my input by encouraging the herd to down-vote. lucian, on the other hand, appears to be one doing the opposite: when he sees a post of mine he agrees with, he points it out, thus discouraging down-votes. But of course you already knew this. You just don't like seeing my comments…
/r/MensRights23/02/12 10:29 PM
6

It's abundantly clear that he is bitter towards a certain subset of women I disagree, but who cares? He feels that men are better off with certain types of women, and not others, and he's right. You'd rather men remain blind to the dangers of marriage with western women. But clearly you've made up your mind that anyone who dares to disagree with you is just a feminist and/or a troll, so there's no point in even discussing anything. As I've told you before, oh dense one, I don't call anyone who d…
/r/MensRights23/02/12 10:18 PM
7

So what you're saying is when men support other men there's something wrong with that. It's "weird". Funny, you never seem to complain when people go around spreading lies in response to my posts. I guess it's okay in your book for men to attack other men, but as soon as a man comes to another man's defense, he's a weirdo. It's not okay for two men to do that, something's "off" about them, huh? It's women like you who have been shaming men who tried to band together to fight for men's rights for…
/r/MensRights23/02/12 10:07 PM
4

This is a myth which has been well-debunked time and again. The only people who are concerned about what I said are feminists and Leftists who think I'm not being sensitive enough, who are also the same people who never actually do any activism. This has all been quite thoroughly discussed over at A Voice for Men, so I have no reason to talk to a feminist concern troll about it. If someone wants to be an activist for men's rights, I'm not stopping them. Though I do find it laughable that you thi…
/r/MensRights23/02/12 09:57 PM
2

He's not angry, just honest, blunt, and unapologetic. It's called being masculine. Our misandric culture demonizes masculinity, claiming men should be more feminine, more like women, cater to women, don't tell the truth, don't speak your mind, be sensitive. No thanks. And that's why you call him "angry", you recognize masculinity as a threat to your entitlements. I'm going to tell you the truth, Jeremiah, much as it pains me. Yes, telling the truth can be hard. I do it every day, and I'm not wel…
/r/MensRights23/02/12 09:45 PM
-1

I don't care if we look bad in the eyes of a feminist like you. In fact, it's an honor.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 09:35 PM
13

In 2010 the High Court rejected his challenge because girls risk pregnancy and the law is entitled to place the burden of criminal sanction on those who bear the least adverse consequences. In other words they first came to the conclusion that boys are bad and must be punished but girls are innocent and sweet, then scrambled to find a flimsy justification for the conclusion they'd already drawn. This is how the Supreme Court works in the US as well, which is why they made discrimination ("affirm…
/r/MensRights23/02/12 09:19 PM
5

"Is it defeatist or treacherous for a doctor to diagnose a disease correctly? My only intention is to cure the disease." - Lady Jessica, Frank Herbert's Dune People are raised in a society where feelings are more important than the truth, so it's to be expected. "Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are even incapable of forming such opinions." - Albert Einstein
/r/MensRights23/02/12 09:09 PM
-6

Nope, I'm with one of the few women who meet the criteria in that article. If I hadn't found her, though, yes, I'd be single and still getting laid if I so chose to lower myself to fuck a typical American slut. I vastly prefer fucking one sexy girl I can trust and masturbating occasionally to porn than having to put up with some dumb, diseased slut just to get sex.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 08:59 PM
-6

A bitter pill to swallow, yes. But quite accurate.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 08:49 PM
-9

I would tell him that 99% of western women are shit and to read up in the manosphere about what to look for in a good woman. Then I'd give him these links: http://thingsarebad.blogspot.com/2011/07/relationship-advice-for-men-or-how-to.html http://boldanddetermined.com/2012/01/21/pick-the-right-wife/
/r/MensRights23/02/12 08:12 PM
1

Judge sounds like an authoritarian Nurse Ratched. His ego is more important than justice. Reminds me of ignatiusloyola lol.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 07:29 PM
-3

You can still get murdered for being the wrong color. The other stuff sounds like bullshit but is nothing in comparison to the state of things today. Men have their kids stolen from them in the millions and millions, and then they're made into wage slaves to support the woman who stole them or placed in fuck-me-in-the-ass-especially-if-I'm-white prison if they refuse.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 07:15 PM
3

The U.S. Government and the chivalrous males are going to declare war on porn. Click here: War on Porn. Obviously, they do not understand why porn is so rampant these days and generating vast revenues. Here is a hint, women are not putting out for their husbands anymore and overall American women are ugly and mean to be around, so an American male has no choice but to find porn as a satisfying alternative to find sweet, pretty, lovable, and naked women. It is really easy to put the porn industry…
/r/MensRights23/02/12 07:03 PM
2

Tell them their assumptions are based on what's politically correct in a world where everything is backwards, a world that is falling apart, where the family unit has been destroyed, and education is nothing but indoctrination, and so they really have no business discussing these matters like their opinions mean shit. Tell them they'll learn more about morality by spending a week reading manosphere material than they will arguing about such ridiculous things as whether porn and prostitution are …
/r/MensRights23/02/12 06:52 PM
1

Government institutes vastly more misandry than religion IMO.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 06:44 PM
2

This is how r/mensrights treats actual MRAs. Good job! Now back to our regularly schemed image meme with 300 up-votes. This place has become such shit.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 12:36 PM
-1

Not big governments lol. Big government has a name, it's called fascism.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 11:25 AM
-1

Yes, government is a tool... a tool of oppression. You're just arguing about who we should oppress, and I'm saying we shouldn't oppress anyone.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 11:11 AM
-4

Lol, that reminds me, a couple times on my sexy ass female blood elf paladin in WoW a guy would message me and start hitting on me. Usually they wouldn't speak very good English and they still kept hitting on me after I told them I was a guy. I had to play a blood elf to be a paladin, though, and I certainly wasn't going to be a skinny ass faggy-looking feminine male blood elf. And I certainly didn't mind looking at a hot bitch's ass all day either. Looks like they made male blood elves less fem…
/r/MensRights23/02/12 10:47 AM
-1

Is tanking even difficult now? I played in BC and WOTLK and they definitely dumbed it down for WOTLK (made it too easy to AOE), but I haven't played in Cataclysm. When it was harder, I'm betting there were even fewer good female tanks. Honestly I've never played with one, but I usually tank myself so I didn't know many tanks other than in guild. I've met a couple good healers, and yeah, maybe a DPSer or two, I suppose. Always seemed like the girls were either shadow priests or mages when I playe…
/r/MensRights23/02/12 10:31 AM
-3

Troll post, contribute or keep quiet. If your only goal is to harass me you are a troll and should be banned.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 10:13 AM
-1

How long will it be before our government and our citizens believe men and boys are also worthy of help and aid? Wrong question. The correct question is how long will it be before the people realize that it is not the government's responsibility to redistribute wealth, and that the proper solution is to end these government programs? How about we get a moderator who's actually active that realizes that government is not the solution, it is the problem, like most actual men's rights activists out…
/r/MensRights23/02/12 07:38 AM
0

And that doesn't mean I've given up completely on humanity, it just means I'm not going to put much effort in. It's the same reason I donated a little money to Ron Paul early on, it's the same reason I post here, even though the establishment is sure to prevent Ron Paul from winning, and even though ignatiusloyola and the stupid fools here are sure to prevent this sub-reddit from actually being a place for activism. At least I've helped ensure the idea of liberty is in the minds of a minority of…
/r/MensRights23/02/12 07:22 AM
1

Why? So my children can be slaves? No thanks. If human beings weren't such idiots, maybe it'd be worth fighting for. But that's not the reality. At least I can die knowing no one of my blood will be an idiot or a slave, because I'm the end of the line. The idiots and their evil masters can have this planet, and they can die on it.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 07:12 AM
0

Yes, I've learned this, though I hadn't seen the link before. It is not comforting to know that human beings are very stupid fucking animals and I'm one of the few who isn't a total fucking moron. What's the point of being Cassandra?
/r/MensRights23/02/12 07:01 AM
1

Just because I focus on the most important metric doesn't mean I'm not considering others. The others simply aren't that important in comparison. In the US we have gone from a constitutional republic where liberty was important, the government was small, the family was intact, and men were men, to a Leftist police state where liberty does not exist, the government is gigantic, the family is destroyed, and men are like women. Leftism has similarly afflicted the rest of the western world. If I wer…
/r/MensRights23/02/12 06:33 AM
1

Or just vote Ron Paul.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 06:23 AM
0

In the western world, it is that simple. The west is defined by the use of Leftist statism in order to control people while letting them think they actually have a say in the matter so that they become pliable.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 06:10 AM
0

On this reddit we get trolled constantly. We also have too many who care more about PCness than the issues. And these issues are correlated. The more our moderators care more about PC, the more they encourage trolling, and the less they do about it.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 04:29 AM
-6

Female gamers generally suck and cause drama. Our feminized liberal culture ensures a lot of male gamers are manginas who will grant women special privileges and put incompetent women in positions over competent men to curry favor. After all, "equality" is more important than success nowadays (that's Leftism for you). In WoW I did know a few decent female healers who didn't cause drama, but they were very rare. Women make poor DPSers generally, and are absolutely horrible at tanking.
/r/MensRights23/02/12 04:10 AM
0

Lol thanks for the reply. I want the government out of my bedroom, out of my life. Does that make me a liberal or a conservative????? That makes you a conservative. Being a pragmatist also makes you a conservative. Conservatives are for liberty, "liberals" are not. I wrote a comment on this topic before, please read it and you'll see where I'm coming from: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ogm86/on_the_use_of_the_word_mangina_in_here_among/c3h7gqx Basically, I consider the left to be m…
/r/MensRights23/02/12 03:59 AM
-4

Hakuna Matata.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 09:51 AM
-7

When you label it whatever it suits you, you make the label meaningless. The truth is we have Leftists who love big government and rightists who know freedom can only be had through limited government. There is little else to discuss, and much you like to obfuscate. PS vintermann is an anti-men's rights troll.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 09:20 AM
-8

Leftism
/r/MensRights22/02/12 09:10 AM
-9

I don't give a shit how you define terms that you just made up out of thin air. Leftism and conservatism are well-defined terms. So is feminism. "Power conservative feminism" does not exist. You made this term up in order to troll. You should be banned for trolling.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 08:56 AM
-9

No, that is what Leftist propagandist tells you. Read up on your history before you spew Leftist propaganda. Conservatism is limited government and little more. The status quo is Leftism.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 08:46 AM
-7

Feminism is Leftist, plain and simple. It always has been. Leftism is big all-powerful government, and actual conservatism is limited government, constitutional Republic. Feminism is and always has been Leftist, Leftist, Leftist. Yes, there are aspects of female supremacy that are traditional in nature, but they pale in comparison to feminism, which is Leftist in nature, and requires government power to sustain itself.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 08:06 AM
-2

This is one of the dumber comments I've read today. I was clearly discussing the left vs the right in a wider context yet applying it to the US, where Dems and Republicans are both leftists, and libertarians are rightists. All across the world, the left is big government oppression and the right is small government freedom. Pretty fucking simple, nitwit.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 07:42 AM
0

This is an example of how eeph uses big words but says nothing, and why he should never be a moderator of this sub-reddit. Of course, ignatiusloyola enjoys eeph's use of big words because it obfuscates the real issues. :)
/r/MensRights22/02/12 07:31 AM
-9

Nah, she attacked first. She's the real abuser. And Miranda Lambert normalizes female on male violence just like Rihanna does. edit: Why is this down-voted? Because it's true? Whoever's down-voting apparently just loves domestic violence against men, and loves blaming men for it. Beautiful, beautiful, feminists, you are.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 07:00 AM
-2

The left is big government. The left believes all problems are solved by big government. Here is Leftism defined: http://jonjayray.tripod.com/leftism2.html The reason all these people around you have their lives fucked up is not just feminism, but leftism, of which feminism is just one component. Feminism is intrinsic to leftism. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yfdKWyzZPQ0 http://www.inmalafide.com/blog/2011/10/24/men%E2%80%99s-rights-activists-you-will-never-win-the-battle-you%E2%80%99re-fightin…
/r/MensRights22/02/12 06:33 AM
-12

Um, no. People like DavidBryon who take every opportunity to disparage conservatism are not NICE, nor will I be in response to these assholes. Be a man, not a bitch.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 06:22 AM
-16

That approach is a deeply conservative one. Maintaining the status quo, not challenging it. The status quo today is Leftism, retard.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 05:54 AM
0

The increasing modding we need is primarily due to ignatiusloyola's new policies since kloo2yoo left that ENCOURAGE it. r/mensrights is spammed and trolled heavily simply because ignatiusloyola's moderation policies encourage it, and ignatiusloyola himself enocurages feminist and other anti-male trolls while discouraging MRAs.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 05:37 AM
2

There is no name that is as succinct and straightforward and has the potential for as much SEO as /r/mensrights. That is the entire reason people stay here and fight against ignatiusloyola in an attempt to reclaim what has been co-opted.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 05:11 AM
2

The problem is not that we don't have the time to put together a better sub-reddit, the problem is that there is only one sub-reddit with the name "men's rights" and that's this one. Even though this sub-reddit does not accurately represent the men's rights movement, ignatius has still stolen the title for himself.
/r/MensRights22/02/12 05:01 AM
-19

Don't be stupid. He didn't say Republican vs Democrat, he said leftist. Republicans and Democrats are big government socialist leftists, Ron Paul is a limited government constitutional republic libertarian/conservative/rightist. Leftism = big government socialist oppression.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 10:02 PM
3

You're onto something there. One of ignatiusloyola's biggest problems is he's still a kid in school, who hasn't had any time in the real world, and he's a grad school student I believe, which means he's even more indoctrinated into the Leftist religion than most. He needs big government Leftism to fund his research. He is suckling on the government teet. His other big problem is he's shacking up with a Lefty woman who has kids by another man, and he doesn't want to upset her by daring to questio…
/r/MensRights21/02/12 09:51 PM
0

People have issue with me because I'm right and I don't apologize for it, I call out stupidity, lies, and logical fallacies, and most people in the western world today are weak and overly sensitive and would rather take offense than have a discussion that questions their assumptions. And I already told you both why I think you would make a terrible mod, TWICE: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/pz5me/more_new_mods/c3tjvco It has nothing to do with your views but with your actions. Who w…
/r/MensRights21/02/12 09:37 PM
0

I already stated my reason. It is not because I disagree with him, it is because he is a follower. Any time ignatiusloyola makes a moderator or banning decision, hardware always back him up, no matter what the decision is, no matter who is banned. He is a follower, and he stands by while MRAs are banned. He even makes jokes about it. Here's but one example: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/pah0e/banned_for_pointing_out_ignat_is_a_feminist/c3nsmrq I believe he did the same thing when M…
/r/MensRights21/02/12 09:24 PM
0

This, my friends, is the difference between an MRA and a do-nothing nobody.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 09:13 PM
-3

Well, yes, this particular sub-reddit has been successfully co-opted. But hey, we put up a good fight, kept it going strong despite ignatiusloyola's efforts for the last couple years. Real men's rights sites will lose some traffic because of how anti-men's rights this place is, and that's sad, but the men's rights movement will continue on. I'll be more concerned if men's rights issues become truly mainstream and feminists try to co-op them then. Anyway, can we re-name this sub-reddit /r/Eunuchs…
/r/MensRights21/02/12 08:48 PM
-9

There's a whole sub-reddit that documents ignatiusloyola's tactics, /r/aboutmensrights Still waiting on evidence regarding r/stormfront and my supposed White Nationalism. Or any evidence about what an evil, evil person I am lol rawrr I'm bad, bad!!!!
/r/MensRights21/02/12 08:37 PM
2

True, that is what the Republicans do with the tea party movement and the Democrats with OWS. Thus far feminists have been very unsuccessful in co-opting the movement, but maybe that's just because it's not that big yet.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 08:25 PM
-6

Hey igs, you "forgot" to distinguish this post. Something tells me you didn't want the extra up-votes that distinguishing it would grant you, because you really like for these types of threads to fall off the front page quickly so no one can see how much people disagree with your moderation. Oh you sly dog you. PS I up-voted your post so more people could see it. You're welcome. edit: Bravo, you distinguished it long after it had fallen off the front page, tool. What a dick.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 08:13 PM
-7

The men's movement would never go pro-feminism because feminism is an enemy to men's rights, but the /r/mensrights sub-reddit in particular is being pushed that way by ignatiusloyola because ignatiusloyola is not an MRA, never was. This sub-reddit has become almost completely useless to the men's movement, as the moderators have run out the real activists and welcomed feminists. Even links to genuine men's rights sites are now heavily down-voted while retarded feminist posts are up-voted, becaus…
/r/MensRights21/02/12 08:02 PM
-10

Nah, not hardware. He's too much of a follower, doesn't care at all when ignatius bans MRAs, always trusts the moderator's judgment for some reason. eeph is an "egalitarian" in other words someone who thinks men and women should be treated equally always, even if it has negative consequences. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/pqwd2/on_military_preparedness_why_women_have_no/c3rix70?context=3 As Demonspawn said: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/pqwd2/on_military_preparedness_…
/r/MensRights21/02/12 07:51 PM
-8

Unlike ignatius, I'm an MRA. This sub-reddit is the #3 result for a Google search of men's rights. The answer as to why I'm still around fighting against his attempts to destroy this sub-reddit should be obvious. What should happen is ignatiusloyola should request moderator status over at /r/MensEquality and go do his stuff over there. Then actual men's rights activists can take over here. But he won't, because this is not about men's rights to him, this is about him, his power, and his faith th…
/r/MensRights21/02/12 07:39 PM
-5

ignatius did not get lucky. He is very manipulative. kloo2yoo was not smart enough to see through him, but I am, and so are all the other MRAs he attacks who have been standing up against him. He whispers lies in PMs like a snake: that's how he got to kloo. This was all part of his plan. He believes that Leftism is the answer to men's rights, the one and only answer, that egalitarianism is the only answer, that all we need to do is focus on the laws and the culture to make sure that men and wome…
/r/MensRights21/02/12 07:28 PM
-10

Oh really, why would it become /r/stormfront? I don't read it, I've never submitted articles from it, and I'm not a White Nationalist, idiot. But you never do tell the truth, little troll. Few of the clowns who go around harassing me here do. But blatant lies and character assassination aren't against the rules here. Well, at least when they're against people ignatiusloyola doesn't like. Why? Because these are ignatiusloyola's primary tactics against the MRAs he harasses. Make them unwelcome. Bu…
/r/MensRights21/02/12 07:15 PM
-7

Yes, the same was said, and we were right. This sub-reddit has gone from a place for MRAs to discuss real issues to a place where Leftie do-nothings up-vote completely retarded feminists and stupid image posts and where the moderator (you) harasses actual MRAs constantly and welcomes feminists with open arms. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/omspb/21st_century_fatherhood/c3igedr Traffic and subscribers are not a valid measurement, as well you know. The MRM does not need 30,000 do-noth…
/r/MensRights21/02/12 07:05 PM
-2

Have you not been paying attention? Moderator actions determine who stays and who goes. ignatiusloyola frequently harasses users who are not far Lefties and tells them they should leave if they don't like it. He also has moderator policies that ensure Lefties are more welcome than conservatives and that Leftie trolls from SRS are quite welcome. I'm glad Qanan has been doing something about a few of these trolls, but it is not enough. I've told the moderators repeatedly the proper way to deal wit…
/r/MensRights21/02/12 06:53 PM
-14

Celda is a good choice even though he's a Leftie. In fact he's the only Leftie here who generally tries to stay rational and is an actual MRA who does, you know, activism. Eeph on the other hand is not a strong poster. He's another "egalitarian" who thinks feminism does some good things. :/ But at least he doesn't like trolls. So I guess no political balance in the moderation team after all. Surprise. thetrollking, Factory2, duglock, there are plenty of posters who are not Lefties who would have…
/r/MensRights21/02/12 06:35 PM
0

I didn't actually write that post for TGMP. Lisa Hickey chose it after I gave her permission to republish any blog posts I'd done. So it was not written for that audience. Interesting explanation, but that doesn't change the result. I also take issue with how close what you are saying is to feminists' criticisms of rape jokes. That's also interesting, but there is a key difference which I have already alluded to. The difference is that there is no "rape culture" and thus feminists have no reason…
/r/MensRights21/02/12 06:23 AM
-4

Let's go on a slut walk! Women shouldn't have to take any personal responsibility for their actions, and if a man dares suggest that they not do stupid, dangerous things for their own personal safety, it's because he is an evil male oppressor who has no right to dare suggest such things! Rawrrr!! PS if you go into a dangerous neighborhood at night and get mugged, you are an idiot and you damn well are partially culpable for the results. Obviously this doesn't excuse the behavior of the mugger, b…
/r/MensRights21/02/12 04:05 AM
1

I made an addendum to my last response to clarify another point. Please read it as well.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 03:54 AM
1

Well, seeing as I could never get away with saying coughcough like that about a female ex in a mainstream publication like TGMP, yes, that is a problematic statement. It makes light of female-on-male violence, and quite intentionally so. More importantly, there is no excusing it no matter what the history is because it is not just about you and him, it is about the normalization of female-on-male violence. Your post makes light of and encourages violence by women against men, which is a huge pro…
/r/MensRights21/02/12 03:33 AM
-4

No, Daenerys is certainly not an MRA.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 02:43 AM
0

Indeed. It's sad how stupid people are these days. I thought the folks in r/politics were bad. Daenerys is mind-numbingly stupid, but even worse people are actually up-voting her drivel, lol. Truly the world has gone insane/retarded.
/r/MensRights21/02/12 02:32 AM
-1

they divorce because they have simply grown apart from their husband or are no longer in love, things like that. That's not a frivolous or selfish reason to me Of course it is. Falling "out of love"? Marriage is a commitment to each other to to your children. "Love" is capricious. It is this whole idea that women are entitled to a fairytale wedding and marriage and to be princesses for the rest of their lives that is the problem. This behavior is puerile and completely unacceptable, but our soci…
/r/MensRights21/02/12 02:03 AM
15

But why wouldn't you want a used up and diseased 35 year old who has had sex with so many guys before you that she can't form proper pair bonds and only settles for you because the bad boys don't want her anymore and she needs someone to pay her bills, when you could bang a young, fresh, and hot teenager or girl in her early 20s every weekend instead?
/r/MensRights20/02/12 11:43 PM
-3

Well, I don't think you can take away the support from newly divorced single mothers. This would not be for the benefit of the child. Oh, perhaps divorce wasn't for the benefit of the child either, but for the benefit of mommy? And perhaps the child living with mommy wasn't for the benefit of the child either, but for the benefit of mommy? So perhaps mommy shouldn't get any support, which would encourage her not to frivolously divorce or try to get sole custody to bump up her child support to th…
/r/MensRights20/02/12 11:07 PM
0

Oh geez, now you're playing stupid. What do you think you've been doing here this whole time, lol? You're really going to sit here and claim you haven't been arguing for the existence of a "rape culture" here. My word. Pointing out to someone that something is not the way to argue against rape culture Hope and pray that your audience is not intelligent enough to discern that this is not what you were doing and that you have been arguing for the idea of "rape culture" where men are excused for ra…
/r/MensRights20/02/12 10:56 PM
1

Lol. If this issue is so important to you, why don't you go ahead and make a self-post and explain to us what "rape culture" means and how this affects men's rights? The only elements of a "rape culture" I'm aware of are those in the prison system and in the case of young boys molested and raped by older women. Those types of rapes are almost always excused and even celebrated ("he's in jail, he deserved it" or "that kid was so lucky to get with his teacher!"). Now THAT is "rape culture". On the…
/r/MensRights20/02/12 10:42 PM
-6

I know the difference between someone who's here to contribute and an eloquent feminist concern troll. You are the latter. I mean, to claim that the incidence in the media of blaming women for their own (actual, not false) rapes is anywhere near the incidence of considering men accused of rape guilty is ridiculous. If you want to be taken seriously, don't lie so blatantly. When's the last time you actually contributed something here that wasn't just "I'm concerned about what you said, what about…
/r/MensRights20/02/12 10:22 PM
-1

Well, that's one aspect of the problem. We also know that women are encouraged to divorce by the culture and by government programs ensuring they are paid well for it through alimony and child support, and we know women initiate the majority of divorces. We also know that about half of all children are born out of wedlock, which usually means the children are raised by single moms. So the problem doesn't start with single motherhood, it ENDS with it. How do we solve all these problems? Also, how…
/r/MensRights20/02/12 10:07 PM
-1

Perhaps.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 09:57 PM
-4

Wow there are a lot of feminists/trolls in this thread: misseff, NiceGuysSTFU, 2Weird2Live2Rare2Die, clockworkgirl21, DaenerysTargaryen1. This article must have really hit a nerve.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 09:44 PM
8

The rise in GLBT has several causes. Boys are feminized (they have fewer male role models, education is feminized, and television promotes feminine traits) and GLBT is glorified in the culture (media, education especially, making it "trendy"). Leftist (AKA feminine-type) political leanings are the norm now, in other words men are mentally weaker, more submissive, and less masculine, traits which have a correlation with GLBT identity. And since Leftists like to think of themselves as victims/mino…
/r/MensRights20/02/12 09:31 PM
7

Yes, BPA is a men's issue. Hestia, an MRA, also did an article on it over at The Spearhead before, The Chemical Sterilization of the Western Man.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 09:19 PM
-4

Yes, TwoX is quite sexist. And misseff is a blatant misandrist.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 09:08 PM
3

Of course politics plays a role in men's rights. Government is probably the primary force utilized against men to deny them their rights. Divorce, child support, father's rights, war deaths, domestic violence law, the criminal sentencing disparity, education, prison rape, VAWA, the double standard regarding male and female genital mutilation, all of these are influenced by politics, and much of these problems would be ameliorated if we had less government intrusion in our lives. So the role of g…
/r/MensRights20/02/12 08:46 PM
7

Jut say Schrodinger's Pussy or Schrodinger's Cunt. We're adults here, we can handle it. Anyway this case reminds of me of Julian Assange. Two sluts hook up with a stud and then find out he's been hooking up with someone else - OMG RAPE!
/r/MensRights20/02/12 09:36 AM
-4

Those are parentheses, not brackets. Also there are many parallels to what has happened in the western world, where traditional social structures have been destroyed in favor of questionable so-called "progressive" policies and the result has been destruction of the family and total dependence on those in power.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 09:26 AM
1

Duh, they're a Leftist organization.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 06:59 AM
2

It's interesting that you say that yet you also said this 6 days ago: I remember when I was 19 and bitter. INB4 "shut up fem-troll" In response to my comment about how women tend to hate men far more than men tend to hate women. Very interesting.
/r/MensRights20/02/12 06:48 AM
1

I know, thanks. :)
/r/MensRights20/02/12 06:26 AM
0

For those who want a tl;dr, start on page 4, THE OUTCOME.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 11:10 PM
-1

My fiancee saw an old friend was blabbering on facebook about how she deserved half of her ex-husband's tax refund who she just divorced, who had been working hard to take care of their family while she was at home sitting on her ass doing the easiest task in the world: childcare. My fiancee was a bit drunk and called her a "greedy slut". A more accurate and succint insult has never been uttered.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 09:06 PM
5

I was wondering how someone could be so cognitively dissonant. Now I understand. Also, I am a healthcare professional. I know this stuff. In other words, government-subsidized healthcare = $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ for people like you. Government meddling in healthcare is why it costs so damn much in the US. Now that's what an actual appeal to motive looks like, and in this case I don't believe it's inaccurate.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 07:12 PM
3

Lol, it is not possible to have a rational argument with you. I advised MRAs to not join forces with conservative old men denying healthcare to women. Ad hominem / guilt by association. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem#Guilt_by_association Also, sharing the burden of insurance costs is how insurance works. Sorry about that. If I so choose to share the burden by choosing an insurance company that provides me the benefits I desire at the costs I am willing to pay, WITHOUT the government man…
/r/MensRights19/02/12 06:52 PM
4

In other words, it's healthcare for women only, most of the costs of which will be placed on men through government mandate. Now the other issue is that you're manipulating the conversation by comparing MRAs to "conservative old men denying healthcare to women" in the first place. Can you name the logical fallacy?
/r/MensRights19/02/12 06:39 PM
1

Well, seeing as I could never get away with saying coughcough like that about a female ex in a mainstream publication like TGMP, yes, that is a misandric statement. It makes light of female-on-male violence, and quite intentionally so. No, there is no excusing it no matter what the history is because it is not just about him and her, it is about the normalization of female-on-male violence.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 06:06 PM
4

So you manned up by bending over and grabbing your ankles? Interesting definition of "manning up".
/r/MensRights19/02/12 05:55 PM
-2

Greetings from SRS!
/r/MensRights19/02/12 05:18 PM
1

The shift is affecting children’s lives. Researchers have consistently found that children born outside marriage face elevated risks of falling into poverty, failing in school or suffering emotional and behavioral problems. Remember this next time a feminist says child support is "for the children" or a socialist says welfare is "for the children". Both of these programs encourage single motherhood. edit: chavelah in this thread is a good example lol
/r/MensRights19/02/12 04:41 PM
-16

Trigger warnings serve to perpetuate the victim narrative necessary for feminism and all other Leftist ideologies. All women are victims of all men and all men are oppressors who must answer for their crimes (AKA patriarchy), all blacks are victims of all whites and all whites are oppressors who must answer for their crimes, the middle class are all victims of the 1% and the 1% must pay, etc.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 05:29 AM
9

Yes, I am being a little sarcastic, but there is also a lot of truth in what I said. Women seem to cause most of the trouble in marriage because of their sense of entitlement and because they benefit most from divorce, while men seem most willing to sacrifice for the sake of the marriage, which means it's unlikely a man is going to stop having sex with his wife without good reason. Men don't want to have sex with women who act unhappy, distant, and angry at them, which is usually what happens wh…
/r/MensRights19/02/12 05:14 AM
8

I like this version better: If a man doesn't want to have sex with his wife, there must be something wrong with her.
/r/MensRights19/02/12 05:03 AM
-11

He's a genuinely nice guy who, yes, does suffer from being Friendzoned all the time. He's not what feminists refer to as a Nice Guy (doing stuff just so the girls will be interested in him), he's just genuinely lovely. He doesn't deserve this. In other words he is a Nice Guy. You're not doing him any favors by encouraging his "genuinely lovely" (chumpish doormat) behavior.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 11:50 PM
-2

His statement is not pointless.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 09:32 PM
-1

Also applies to sexual harassment laws.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 08:50 PM
0

The mod policy is in need of an update. It still talks about adding "flair" for trolls which is not something that works or should be done. The mod policy does not define troll. Perhaps it should. And the definition isn't that complicated. A troll is someone who wishes to disrupt rather than add to the conversation. So a troll in the r/mensrights sub-reddit in practice is usually someone who posts sarcastic anti-male remarks frequently. Ignatiusloyola also misuses the term "concern troll" becaus…
/r/MensRights18/02/12 08:22 PM
0

A great example of how ignatiusloyola constantly bad mouths and makes things up about those he disagrees with. And no, I don't support free speech for obvious anti-male trolls, nor should I.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 07:50 PM
0

My own views on who should be a mod are based on representing the community as best as possible. Absolute rubbish. You often talk about how MRAs who disagree with you politically, who constitute a large portion of the members here, and a huge majority of the wider men's rights community, should go off and make their own sub-reddit.
/r/MensRights18/02/12 05:59 AM
2

You seem like a good guy and a genuine MRA, Kyle. I'm a fan. Do realize that ignatiusloyola has some bad habits, such as how he frequently harasses MRAs who disagree with his ideology. Perhaps you can work with him to improve his behavior and restore this sub-reddit to something like it was when kloo2yoo was around. Here's a note that provides all the information you need on ignatiusloyola's behavior: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/pgbhu/something_id_like_to_whine_about_momentarily_…
/r/MensRights18/02/12 05:49 AM
-15

Good luck, Celda, you're a Leftist moron but I think over time you'll learn. You're one of the few willing to stand against true stupidity. When you grow up, head over to the manosphere.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 08:17 AM
-13

Yes, he's a troll here who has been trolling for months ans months. Because ignatiusloyola likes it that way. So fuck it. Ban me too: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ptmzq/bye_everybody/ Since this reddit has now become r/Oney, where women, manginas, and flamboyant homosexuals are superior to dirty evil white male heterosexuals, and ignatiusloyola welcomes feminists, encourages trolls, and shoos away MRAs, one can't help but expect to be down-voted for telling truths that conflict wi…
/r/MensRights17/02/12 08:01 AM
-1

The moderator of r/mensrights, ignatiusloyola, is working against men's rights, yes.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 07:22 AM
-1

Well, when the moderator of r/MensRights welcomes feminists, encourages trolls, and shoos away MRAs, one can't help but expect to be down-voted for telling truths that conflict with the feminist/Leftist ideology/religion.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 04:18 AM
-1

That's not saying much, OneY is full of women, flamboyant homosexuals, and manginas.
/r/MensRights17/02/12 03:55 AM
2

TwoX is full of sexist women and some sexist men: http://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/mz4n4/this_may_be_a_bit_taboo_but_comments_like_this/c353lft I'm mostly a reddit lurker, but hang out on 2X often. I think this subreddit is for the most part sane and rational. I'd say there is less misandry here than misogyny is on the rest of reddit. That said, there is a fair bit of hypocrisy here concerning gender issues. I wouldn't say "male bashing" but let me give you some examples: 2X hate…
/r/MensRights17/02/12 03:43 AM
3

I don't want them to go away. You're not very smart, then. These trolls are down-voting the most important threads and the only way to deal with them is to ban them.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 06:51 PM
0

Did you know Leftism is like a religion? http://lgfonevolution.blogspot.com/2011/05/leftism-as-religion.html
/r/MensRights16/02/12 07:36 AM
-4

Pfft, women are the ones who cannot stop chattering on about their love lives at work.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 06:30 AM
-1

Work with your gyno girl, that ain't natural.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 06:20 AM
-2

Did someone make the woman NOT sacrifice HERSELF? No, she chose to let him die for her. In fact, she probably expected him to. Could it be that our culture celebrates men who sacrifice themselves for women and shames men who do not? Um, yup! Same reason bitches shouldn't be in the military, because our culture trains men to sacrifice their lives for women, which puts the entire group in danger. Silly feminist bitch. The worst part about democracy is even ignorant fucks like you who have the wisd…
/r/MensRights16/02/12 02:42 AM
-4

I know exactly what you're doing. Blaming women because you don't want to have to control your hormones like an adult. If women had control of their hormones like adults they'd stop dressing like sluts in order to attract men, and instead they'd go do something productive like men do. The slutwalk isn't about men looking. It's about how no one deserves to be raped even if they dress slutty. Looking =/= rape. Slut walk is nothing but women bitching about men suggesting they don't do stupid shit, …
/r/MensRights16/02/12 02:32 AM
-1

Then maybe you should have stepped in front of the guy to take the bullet instead. But no, women don't do that.
/r/MensRights16/02/12 02:21 AM
-6

If you don't understand what I said yet then you are too stupid too ever understand it. Go join a slut walk protest. It's the exactly same mentality.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 11:27 PM
-6

Complete and utter shit. They're basically saying that women can do whatever the hell they like, and it's men's fault for reacting to women differently than they would men. Woman dresses like a tramp in a crowd of men? It's men's fault for looking, not the woman's fault for dressing like a tramp to attract attention, and the only "good" men are the ones who don't look. Woman in the military gets saved by men who sacrifice their lives for her where they would not a man, it's men's fault for savin…
/r/MensRights15/02/12 11:11 PM
1

unrelated issue Ahahahahaha what a clown.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 09:58 PM
0

Champion of the swine!
/r/MensRights15/02/12 09:29 PM
0

Are you a word chef? Because you sure know how to mince words! Ahahahaha, I'm so funny.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 09:17 PM
1

Remember these? Hehe. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/mcruf/women_in_the_army_are_paid_the_same_but_are_in/ http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/iy19t/its_official/c27npug http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSb-ok65KGI The funny thing about ignatiusloyola welcoming all these trolls and equality nuts here to down-vote threads like this is that when all the real MRAs have largely given up on this place, the equality nuts will have nothing to do, and this sub-reddit will be very, ver…
/r/MensRights15/02/12 09:14 PM
1

That's a rather silly thing to respond with. This has all been discussed before. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/mcruf/women_in_the_army_are_paid_the_same_but_are_in/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSb-ok65KGI http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/iy19t/its_official/c27npug
/r/MensRights15/02/12 09:04 PM
1

Fascism is racist, elitist, authoritarian utilisation of the collective for the benefit of the few (or the benefit of the country). Which describes very well the socialist state we have today. Thank you for agreeing.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 09:00 PM
1

Socialism = fascism in practice, as we've all seen. And yes, those examples were how socialism is implemented in practice. We can see the same thing happening today in the US.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 08:40 PM
-2

You can't force the same risk on men and women when men will give up their lives and risk the mission simply to protect women. By including women you endanger everyone's lives and put men at greater risk.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 08:33 PM
-2

Not really a relevant question. Men's rights is not about equal rights, it is about men's rights. If you want a sub-reddit dedicated only to equal rights, try /r/egalitarian. edit: I tried created /r/MensEquality for you the other day, but it said it already existed. Maybe you can petition for control of it and you can go over there with your equality nuts and SRS trolls and circlejerk about true equality, and leave the MRAs control of the sub-reddit that's supposed to be about men's rights, not…
/r/MensRights15/02/12 08:21 PM
-9

Wow. Apparently I'm only a real man if I get myself killed saving the women. Booya! Man, I wish I were on the Titanic so I could sacrifice my life for women! http://www.avoiceformen.com/men/mens-issues/titanic-day-ll/
/r/MensRights15/02/12 10:54 AM
-47

Down-voted because of you who are. Sorry, I'm only mimicking others.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 10:17 AM
1

If you want a Society based on Legal Equality, then you have two choices: Bring men's reproductive rights up to equal those of women (no requiring CS for children they don't want). or Reduce women's to those of men (don't want a baby? Never have sex, or oral sex, period). You can't have anything in between, no matter how much you would LIKE it. This is SUPPOSED to be an egalitarian society. Watching woman after woman try to justify the inequality, based on self interest, is truly disheartening, …
/r/MensRights15/02/12 06:39 AM
-2

http://www.inmalafide.com/blog/2012/02/12/linkage-is-good-for-you-week-of-february-12-2012/
/r/MensRights15/02/12 06:03 AM
3

I wasn't aware he got circumcised at 37 to please his wife or that he tried to murder his wife and commit suicide, actually.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 05:32 AM
-1

Wil is a huge mangina.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 05:11 AM
1

Well that's what they claimed, but the true point of welfare has always been to make the people dependent on the government rather than the family.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 04:57 AM
0

Consume, minions!
/r/MensRights15/02/12 04:16 AM
2

It's an art. :)
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:30 AM
2

I think it's amusing how Pelle uses a euphemism to describe the fact that women are selfish and have used men for their own needs for all of history: Women are more aware of their choices, and evolutionary speaking women have always had to think about how good a deal they can get when interacting with men. Pelle's a good guy, though.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:20 AM
1

lol
/r/MensRights15/02/12 03:03 AM
0

There's actually a very easy solution. End welfare, end CPS. Problems solved.
/r/MensRights15/02/12 01:52 AM
1

Hey, someone else understands what a troll is! You should let ignatiusloyola know. I've told him the same thing numerous times but he's not a very good listener.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 08:21 PM
-3

troll post
/r/MensRights14/02/12 08:11 PM
-3

Misogyny is not anything that offends your delicate liberal sensibilities.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 08:00 PM
2

Shut up feminist! Also note, what you said was not "disagreeing with me", it was trolling me. So learn to keep your mouth shut or take your hits, little gossip queen.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 07:39 PM
1

Apologies if I'm mistaken.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 11:53 AM
-1

I cannot force another man to see the world around him if he does not want to see it. I've had a sampling of women from all around the world to draw conclusions from, and I've also read the accounts of many other men around the world who've done similar. Almost all women are to some degree misandric. For that matter, almost all men are as well. And my initial claim was the following: Women are far more sexist against men on the whole than men are against women, actually. I stand by it. If someon…
/r/MensRights14/02/12 10:49 AM
6

That's fine. We should be anti-free speech. I don't argue for free speech. This is a place for people who want to discuss men's rights, not a place for anti-male trolls to circlejerk. Well, at least it should be. :)
/r/MensRights14/02/12 10:33 AM
1

I don't think they're rich but they probably come from middle class or above families.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 08:55 AM
-3

The blame lies with every man and woman who believes that we need a police state because protecting us from ourselves is more important than freedom. In other words, leftists, who dominate the political discourse of the western world.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 08:20 AM
-4

I have a terrible reputation with SRS trolls like you and feminist trolls like eskachig, I admit. For some reason, feminists hate me!
/r/MensRights14/02/12 08:10 AM
10

Nah that's just a myth you SRS trolls perpetuate so you feel intellectually superior because you are insecure: http://www.reddit.com/r/SRSMeta/comments/pmv1h/meta_request_a_compilation_of_all_the_crackpot/c3qxeaw?context=3
/r/MensRights14/02/12 07:58 AM
-3

Dodge, dodge, dodge. Your question isn't relevant. The fact is supporting leftism is detrimental to men's rights. The fact is "moar leftism" means more misandry. Keep dodging, coward.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 07:05 AM
0

The progressive feminist movement. Remember that. The progressive feminist movement.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 06:42 AM
21

Nice talk, but they are constantly invading here, and I haven't seen you wiping the floor with any of them.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 06:11 AM
10

Accusing U. is a new campaign developed by SAVE, aimed at reversing the government's directive and educating students across the country on this new assault on students' rights. Please sign our petition, join the Accusing U. Facebook page, and pass along this information to any college students you know! Visit the Accusing U. webpage: www.accusingu.org.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 06:00 AM
-4

why would society be any more willing to take away women's rights and remove the vote? Gee, I dunno, why didn't women have the privilege to vote in the past? Perhaps something changed within the last 100-150 years? Could it be technology and leftism? Could it be that men's natural generosity allowed women's natural selfishness to take root and destroy this country once technology allowed for it, and now we should learn from our mistakes and try to correct them, rather than screaming "moar leftis…
/r/MensRights14/02/12 05:48 AM
1

My boyfriend and I have had the discussion about marriage and we both like the idea of having a ceremony without the actual legal marriage. I would like that as well, after all I'm already engaged. Only problem is the state I live in has common law marriage, though it does require I sign off on it I believe. I don't mind being married in spirit but certainly not legally.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 05:38 AM
1

My only point here is consistency. So you agree that Title IX is sexist against men and must be eliminated. Please don't give me an excuse about how educational institutions that have sports are different or how government is God. You can't be socialist only when it suits you and capitalist when it suits women. That's called misandry.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 05:27 AM
21

And ignatiusloyola still welcomes SRS into our sub-reddit, refusing to ban them, chillin' with therealbarackobama who has had beautiful heartwarming discussions with him.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 05:12 AM
7

FYI guys, this post was submitted by an SRS troll in an attempt to draw r/MR submitters to say something questionable. They were talking about it in IRC, and this poster rarely posts to r/MR and has previously been considered a troll, see here. As usual, I've got your back. [19:00] <tarabluh> going to post this again [19:00] <tarabluh> because [19:00] <tarabluh> ahaha [19:00] <tarabluh> http://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/pnuys/pregnancy_resulted_from_onenightstand_girl_wants/ [19:00] <ta…
/r/MensRights14/02/12 02:24 AM
4

I'd suggest you spend less time at r/MensRights. The moderators have allowed and encouraged anti-male trolls to down-vote and troll good submissions, and refuse to do anything about it because these same trolls hate more conservative posters like me. Wouldn't it be nice if all you had to deal with was guys like me who question a few very specific things about your thoughts rather than shit on men constantly? But it is true. People don't care. And not just about men's rights, but about all the ot…
/r/MensRights14/02/12 02:11 AM
-3

Not true. Men are who we should focus on. If enough men wise up, women will follow, as it has always been.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 02:11 AM
7

As a pro-male MRA, I'd personally be happy to be banned as long as all the ANTI-MALE trolls like you were also banned.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 02:02 AM
6

Because I'll just come back forevermore, just like you. No, you won't, because if you are banned as soon as you start trolling, you will always be rate limited to 9 minutes between posts and you will quickly give up after being repeatedly banned. It's already been laid out very clearly here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/p3evt/just_to_reiterate_please_do_not_post_links_to_srs/c3mmsri?context=1 The mods could easily end the troll problem within 2 weeks, and keep trolls like you out …
/r/MensRights14/02/12 01:51 AM
-2

In came chowpie. Oops, you deleted it, but the replies reveal what you said. One might ask why you're not banned. But I already know the answer: you primarily harass MRAs that ignatiusloyola despises because we are not extreme socialists bordering on communists like him. He likes that you harass us and down-vote us, because he doesn't like us. Nevermind that you down-vote and harass a bunch of other people as well, and destroy this sub-reddit, as long as you might irritate us.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 01:40 AM
4

When the trolls disagree vehemently with you, you know you're onto something. And not only is the trolling itself a problem, but if you refuse to ban the main accounts of trolls, it's very easy them to not only troll but down-vote quality posts heavily, which is exactly what we are seeing. I mean, why is NiceGuysSTFU still not banned? All he does is troll and skew the down-votes. He was doing it several months ago, and now he's back and doing it again. But meh, ignatiusloyola is just like the po…
/r/MensRights14/02/12 01:30 AM
-2

Yes, because masculinity is a stereotype. Of course. Men who are headstrong are just being macho because they hate women and they're insecure. I've got it, feminists tell the same lies. You're a very sad man.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 01:20 AM
-4

No, it's short for feminist-troll. eskachig: Hahaha I'm more of a feminist than my girlfriend is
/r/MensRights14/02/12 01:10 AM
-1

You haven't cited anything. ignoring citation, you haven't provided any reasonably logical argument. Jesus, I need citations now. I can't just tell you to pay attention to the women around you and ask whether they think these things. No, that would require too much thought. I'm done with ya, pal.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 12:53 AM
-6

fem-troll Not everyone's input is equal, women choose men who are better than them (hypergamy), obviously women know less than me about men's rights issues and most other things, so I'm not going to give them equal input on those things.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 12:38 AM
-3

Those guys were successfull despite being assholes. I don't want to be emotionally abusive and overtly cautious, though there was one time when I thought I needed to be. No, they were successful because of it. Masculinity gets shit done, as it always has. That's why men have advanced civilization and technology so far while women were happy to stay in the background contributing little but their wombs. The idea that playing nice and begging people to do things for you is more effective than bein…
/r/MensRights14/02/12 12:35 AM
-8

You are a bit full of yourself, lol. Tell me , in one paragraph of no more than four sentences, why it's your opinion that more than 75% of women are against mens rights, or the MRM. Why would I do that? I just showed you my argument like you asked, and gave examples defending it. Now you're talking about your argument again, one that doesn't even really have meaning. I'm sensing blissfully ignorant troll now.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 12:32 AM
-3

Shut up, fem-troll.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 12:31 AM
-2

Shut up, fem-troll.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 12:31 AM
0

silly
/r/MensRights14/02/12 12:30 AM
0

You are leaving out the fact that fathers are rarely ever paid for paternity leave and are incentivized greatly not to take it, whereas mothers are often paid for it.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 12:29 AM
-2

The US does have healthcare, the government is just too involved in it and has made sure that health insurance agencies can get monopolies in states. Everything the government has done has raised the cost of healthcare in the US.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 12:26 AM
-10

She DESPISES women drivers. She believes from the bottom of her heart that they are pure shit. This is mildly hilarious to me. They are terrible. Most should not be allowed on the road. Honestly I'd drive better blind drunk than most women would sober. This is why DUI laws that do not require the driver to actually have driven dangerously are ridiculous.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 12:20 AM
-1

Wow, you're dumb. Sever, fool.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 12:19 AM
-2

It seems to me that you're only focusing on those things because they are easy and she will agree. Is this why you refuse to deal with other men's rights issues, because your lady friend would not approve? Pathetic.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 12:18 AM
1

I say the same about women's sports in college. And if people are not interested in it, then women's programs should be eliminated so that men's programs can survive. Thus Title IX should be abolished.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 12:17 AM
1

Then you agree that Title IX is sexist again men.
/r/MensRights14/02/12 12:16 AM
3

by pro woman i think you mean anti male
/r/MensRights14/02/12 12:14 AM
-5

In other words you have no argument. Nice troll, though, at least it's different. Funny that it's always leftists throwing out terms like this, like confirmation bias, because they have no rational argument to present. http://conservapedia.com/Liberal_obfuscation The interesting thing is it is leftists who see everything through a lens of confirmation bias. Everything is about equality. Meanwhile, conservatives seek simply the truth. They attempt to let go of their biases and see what is true so…
/r/MensRights14/02/12 12:08 AM
-2

Most women are not for equal rights, responsibilities, and privileges. Almost all women demand some privilege merely for being female, demand that men take greater responsibility, or demand that women have greater or equal rights. Give me a woman and I'll show you a sexist who believes she deserves something over men simply for having a vagina. This is why it's a matter of degree. There are some women who will agree on certain men's rights issues, but they'll almost always cling in some manner t…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 11:54 PM
0

That is wise and still reasonable, unlike women's demands. Also, most men are not wise and reasonable.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 11:39 PM
-9

I'm pretty positive I've been the emotionally abusive one. One making the rules due to insecurities and near-impossible ideals. I have little regrets especially since I kind of can see my former self eventually making everything impossible. And without the "red pill", I'm pretty sure I would've done even worse. But damn, I would do things so differently if I've known then. This is an example of how our culture demonizes masculinity. It demonizes people who know what they want, who are headstrong…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 11:35 PM
-4

What I mean is: You must know a lot of feminists. No, I am talking from experience in the workplace, from male and female grunt workers to engineering drones to corporate drones. You are pointing out outliers only. The exception proves the rule. Also note that it is a matter of degree. Even your typical hardcore cowgirl expects a man to take care of her.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 11:26 PM
-11

Keep tellin' yourself that, son. You already gave it away.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 11:23 PM
-4

Actually, it's more dangerous to be involved with an engineer, because they'll think they're smarter than they actually are, they'll make more money which means they'll demand a man who makes even more money, and they're quite full of themselves generally. You're right to avoid ones that have been heavily feminized, of course. But you really don't want a girl who thinks she is a genius, because she will be wrong someday and you will be right, but she will never admit it. The sad thing is that to…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 11:18 PM
-5

tl;dr - be diplomatic, more lenient, and more willing to compromise when it comes to MRA/Feminist perspectives in a relationship. Your SO isn't an opponent down at the debate hall, so try to avoid treating these types of conversations in that way. Tsk tsk tsk. No! You do not compromise on the truth just to make some woman feel better. Jeez. How do you start off so right yet end up so wrong? To answer your first question, my SO sees my views on MRA issues as constructive, but oftentimes takes the…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 11:16 PM
-4

I just want to be taken seriously if I'm raped and not have children taken from me if I have them and that we're not irrational. That's all you want? I demand more.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 11:09 PM
-1

Bravo. If she was not willing to accept this, then that means she was more concerned about social standing than about your relationship and about you. In other words, she was too selfish to stay with. Note all the other guys in this thread talking about women taming their ideas. They are young and stupid, and they are letting women's emotions dictate their views! Men need time to find themselves and learn the truths of the world without being concerned that the woman they love is going to get up…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 11:08 PM
-2

If it doesn't always work, you have a problem. Love is a stupid reason to stay with someone who does not respect you and is unwilling to work on things. edit: Ever heard of hypergamy? Of course you aren't going to think everything she says is reasonable, she's a woman. Why the hell would she have any reason not to respect what you say? One of you is right, and either you're an idiot or you're right, and she shouldn't be disrespecting you. Either way, you aren't ready for this relationship.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 11:04 PM
-13

She, in turn, has moderated some of my positions over the years. I'm more sympathetic to issues like the street harassment of women then I used to be, as it was an issue I had previously dismissed as trivial. Tsk tsk tsk, never let your woman affect your views. "Street harassment of women" is a trivial issue, directly caused by women who intentionally dress like prostitutes in order to get attention and then get pissed off when the wrong type of guy looks at them. You need to spend more time lea…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 11:04 PM
-1

Good luck hahaa.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 11:02 PM
2

Atheism and Christian ideas can be quite compatible as long as neither forces their belief system on others. On the other hand, if you're an MRA and your woman has feminist leanings, you are going to have a problem no matter what. My gf is still trying to figure out if I'm worth keeping or not... as am I with her though :( If she hasn't figured it out yet you should find a new one because even if you stuck it out, she'd easily change her mind and kick your ass to the curb with some child support…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 11:00 PM
-7

not reactionary Jesus-freaks http://www.avoiceformen.com/misandry/why-are-atheists-so-religious/ You probably don't even recognize your own bigotry. As an atheist, I don't find a need to insult traditionalists every chance I get.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 10:59 PM
-9

I assume she is a leftist like you. Is this why you refuse to let go of your leftist delusions which fly in the face of rights for men? Perhaps it's worth it for you. After all, if you started becoming conservative and realized that men and women can never be equal, and that women's suffrage necessarily equals oppression of men and leads only to misandry and a police state, she would dump your ass, wouldn't she? I wonder if this has something to do with ignatiusloyola's leftism too. And this is …
/r/MensRights13/02/12 10:52 PM
-7

Sever the relationship, man. Before she traps you. And don't warn her either. This is not a healthy response. She DOES NOT RESPECT YOU. Respect is the most important thing for a woman to give a man in a relationship. It is everything! My gal does not agree with everything I say, but she doesn't go out of her way to question me and tell me I'm wrong, after all she doesn't know nearly as much about these things as I do. She respects me. I don't care how difficult it is, you need to develop an exit…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 10:50 PM
-7

IE when we go to restaurants, even though we eat at the same table, I may get better service and better food, so when it comes time to make a tip, we both pick numbers and I average them, unless her service was SUPER TERRIBLE which it has been sometimes, then I leave little/no tip. Dude, just pay attention and decide the tip yourself. You should be able to estimate perfectly what her desire for the tip should be and do that math in your head. Throwing her a bone so she feels like she's in contro…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 10:45 PM
-20

Women are far more sexist against men on the whole than men are against women, actually. Most women can tolerate a little men's rights material, for example, but not if you really get into the roots. If you dare say that misandry is the dominant form of sexism in the western world, almost all women will call bullshit and claim that women were oppressed and still are. They'll get offended because they'll take it personally because they are women and that's what women tend to do. And you also know…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 10:40 PM
-8

Trust your instincts, man. If you had any doubts then they were probably spot on and not worth the risk. Even the best western women these days are a huge risk, especially if you're the type of guy who's going to stand up for himself and she's been taught from birth that your role is to pedestalize her and do as she says.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 10:37 PM
-5

I am not. I'm just perceptive. If you take issue with something I said, address it. You are also the same person who claims women were oppressed by evil men 100 years ago, so I take your input with a huge grain of Celtic light grey sea salt. What his girlfriend is doing is a common feminist tactic. Any time a man raises an issue, they'll say "oh, but this affects women too, see? It's not a misandry issue, it's a gender role issue, blame the patriarchy, men have nothing unique to complain about, …
/r/MensRights13/02/12 10:34 PM
-18

She's the one who felt the need to mention "oh the poor wimminz, gender roles" in Twilight after you pointed out the misandry. That's because she is trying to dilute the issue and ignore the misandry. That is a common feminist tactic. And you already admitted that it works, because you said that she convinces you that you're over-reacting when you're not at all. She is successfully hindering your ability to think clearly regarding these issues by throwing out the over-used "what about the wimmin…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 10:33 PM
-2

Yes, feminism is emotional, not realistic. Feminists have a goal and they'll say anything to achieve it, even blatant lies, because they like the emotional feeling they get from it.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 10:31 PM
1

Anthropologically speaking, I could say that men have evolved to specialize in being selfish and wanting to impregnate as many women as possible, thus ensuring their fitness biologically. I'm aware, but I think they also have an innate desire to protect women. As long as human beings have been in communities, men have had a need to protect women in order to get sexual access to them and carry on their DNA though children that lived. Women who did not get others to provide for them and take care …
/r/MensRights13/02/12 10:29 PM
-21

So she's basically doing what feminists do, "what about the wimminz!?" I said elsewhere: But you really don't need a woman to agree with you on everything, after all, generally if you're getting advice from your woman on men's rights issues you aren't doing it right. A woman has no right to tame your views based on what she feels is socially acceptable, and if you have one trying to censor you like this, this means she cares more about social perception than she does about you. The reason she is…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 10:16 PM
-6

A decent woman is capable of understanding why misandry is an important issue. However I've only ever known of maybe two women who are die-hard MRAs: Hestia and girlwriteswhat. All other females have had some reservations, an inability to fully see the truth before them. Most women are simply too solipsistic to really grasp truths that question themselves. Meanwhile there are countless men who are capable of seeing the full truth before them, but they also are still a minority. With that said, y…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 10:10 PM
-2

She supports it and calls me out on it if I get irrational. Yes, it is possible to go overboard. Such as?
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:54 PM
-3

I believe there is a nature element to it, as women being the sex that benefits most from being selfish and demanding and men being the sex that benefits most from being self-sacrificial, it's likely men and women have specialized. Heck, if you watch the Human Planet BBC series you'll see a fine example of a man in the jungle admitting that his wife is starting to get angry with him and pressure him to climb a tree to get honey for her and the kids. You don't need western social conditioning for…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:49 PM
-3

Assuming women will never change and that they will always be hypergamous is a bit too cynical for me, but if we assume you're correct then we should also assume that men will never change and we'll always want to be the protector, provider in the relationship. It's obvious. First, women have evolved to specialize in being selfish and wanting to be taken care of because they benefit most from it, and men have evolved to take care of women because they benefit most from it. So there are very like…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:43 PM
3

Because it is "radical" to base one's views on reality.... Yes, when you live in a leftist world where feelings are more important than reality.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:34 PM
0

ignatiusloyola only bans libelous users who are un-PC. For example, it's fine for someone to be racist against whites or for men to make unwanted sexual advances at other males, but it's never okay for someone to be racist against blacks or other minorities or to make unwanted sexual advances at women. These are not issues because political correctness states whites and men are privileged. I have people like drinkthebleach who spends almost all his time trolling me with lies, calling me a pedoph…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:30 PM
-1

The problem is democracy. we have to consider that democracy creates backward thinking. In realistic thinking, we compare opinions to reality and pick the one that is correspondent to reality as valid. In democracy, since we’re all equal, all opinions are valid, and so there’s no comparison to reality. http://www.amerika.org/politics/sopa-a-distraction/comment-page-1/#comment-13654 The US was supposed to be a republic, not a democracy, but the constitution has been torn to shreds by leftist poli…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:20 PM
-7

Women will never change, and it's foolish to assume they will. They'll always be hypergamous, they will always want to marry up, and so the real problem here is that men are getting shafted in education by women who are just going to get pregnant and drop out of work anyway.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:16 PM
1

TODAY women earn almost 60 percent of all bachelor’s degrees and more than half of master’s and Ph.D.’s. Many people believe that, while this may be good for women as income earners, it bodes ill for their marital prospects. Oh, that's the concern. Women's marital prospects.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:14 PM
-3

As a man, you have reasonable expectations, yet even though they're reasonable there are few women who meet them. All men generally want is a woman who is stable, sane, attractive, somewhat intelligent, gets along with them, and won't betray them. As a woman, they have unreasonable expectations, and though they're are plenty of men who are good enough for them, they won't settle for any of them until they have to. They want a prince who gives them everything they've ever wanted whenever they wan…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:11 PM
-3

It's impossible to rape an SRS troll.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:10 PM
0

Indeed. It's probably not going to matter in the long run because leftism is taking us toward a global fascist state and the people clearly do not care, but at least we can be men when we die, rather than little leftist girls begging for attention.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:08 PM
-1

That's actually fairly accurate.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 10:21 AM
-7

You're dumb.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 10:19 AM
-12

Haha, excuses for your selfish demands. Most guys would be happy with a girl who just doesn't constantly nag regardless of her background. You, of course, have very specific demands because you are a woman.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 10:17 AM
-1

It doesn't even really matter. Even if one foolishly assumed that the sex that benefits most from selfish behavior would not evolve to specialize in being selfish, and that there is no innate difference in women's and men's selfishness or moral agency, the nurture element is still going to guarantee that women continue to be what they always have been: selfish. You stupid ass leftists aren't going to get your dream world where everyone is grown in a vat and the sexes are given equal opportunity …
/r/MensRights13/02/12 10:03 AM
0

http://www.reddit.com/domain/counterfeminism.info/ Ah, memories. I think the best word for you is traitor. And all for your hokey religion, leftism. Truly despicable.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:57 AM
-2

Now you know what it's like to be me, constantly down-voted by ignorant unthinking PC leftists because I'm an evil "misogynist". Enjoy. I should post more shit from your blog here and make them blindly hate you as they do me. If you wake up to what your ideology has wrought before you die, and I'm thinking you might because it's going to get bad, just remember I told ya so, and you spat in my face. Keep up with your shitty blog that nobody reads and has no point, dickhead.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:39 AM
1

No prob.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:29 AM
7

The Supreme Court would never side with socialists and anti-freedom types. They've been doing so for at least a century.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 09:01 AM
2

Libertarians and MRAs are already considered "terrists" in the eyes of the police state.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 08:59 AM
-1

Leftism: Must protect people from themselves, eliminate freedom. Y'all leftists get what ya deserve, it's just unfortunate that the rest of us will have to suffer for it too.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 08:53 AM
-4

Police state.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 05:35 AM
-1

In other words, you're saying if a woman regrets sex after the fact it becomes rape.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 05:33 AM
-4

ignatiusloyola encourages anti-male trolling, which does not describe my activities.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 05:32 AM
-1

And therefore there may be something inherent to women that makes them more likely to be selfish and childish. All evidence points to yes.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 05:31 AM
0

Women are innately different than men.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 04:03 AM
-1

Ever heard of token resistance? You know, a common tactic by women so as not to appear too easy? Here is an example of ambiguous token resistance: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSHinT0i6G4 I swear the problem with the western world is people have no idea what the real world is like yet they sit in their chairs and find shit to get offended over. Also, I never read that other thread. Then read it!
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:57 AM
-1

That this is not a concern. Duh.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:56 AM
-1

We have to distinguish between the content of the statement “Women aren’t funny” and the statement “There aren’t women who are funny.” Conflating the two is a typical habit of leftists (and thus feminists); being nominalists, they take any normative statement (i.e., the former) as a universal statement (i.e., the latter), as referring to each and every possible woman rather than to the general form or essence of womanhood, from which there may be accidental deviations. http://www.inmalafide.com/…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:52 AM
-2

Did you learn nothing from this thread? http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/pk1o6/rmensrights_has_an_image_problem/
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:50 AM
0

Did you learn nothing from this thread? http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/pk1o6/rmensrights_has_an_image_problem/
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:49 AM
-3

Forcibly? So he held her down and took her pants off while she kicked and screamed? No? Then he didn't force her pants off.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:48 AM
1

Are you not listening? Every comment you make gives those trolls power. Every time you apologize it gives enemies to men's rights power. Pray that my comment makes the rounds, and use it as an opportunity to point out the logical fallacy of assuming that every MRA is the same. Point out the things you like about r/MR. Publicity is not a bad thing. When you apologize, it makes you look guilty. That is the real takeaway. Besides, people who are stupid enough to believe that one comment represents …
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:39 AM
-2

Your mind is a bit mixed up. You are simultaneously claiming what he said is misogynistic because he is criticizing women, and that your definition of misogyny is NOT criticizing women. So when somebody tries to make people believe that it is, either by stating it outright or by posting crap like jumad is, it irritates me. That's because you are a fool. There is nothing to worry about. As I said elsewhere: Why should I play by other people's rules? My goal is to change the rules. If we play by t…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:30 AM
-7

A clean image is not something the men's rights movement needs or can ever achieve.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:28 AM
0

No, it is not. You spend too much time worrying about boogeymen. There is nothing to worry about. It is people like you who can't stop being concerned who give the SRS trolls who would abuse my comments power. You give them the power by making a big deal out of nothing.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:25 AM
-7

Why should I play by other people's rules? My goal is to change the rules. If we play by their rules, we lose. We must change that status quo, not cater to it. That is the point. You spend too much time apologizing and worrying about what others will think, when you should be worrying about what is true. We will change nothing if we allow political correctness to dictate what we say.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:21 AM
-3

Oh, I know. I just think Cartesian_Duelist's apologetic mentality is pathetic. He's throwing bones to the enemies of men's rights. Then again, he's just a confused concern troll.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:19 AM
-2

He's posting the worst of the crap you do in an attempt to make people think this subreddit hates women. The crap I do? When is the last time I said I enjoy looking at pictures of battered women? Because nothing else he said in the comment you replied to is questionable. Again, you are lying. Actually, I'm doing it for /r/MensRights, not women. You are doing this to promote your own version of what you think this sub-reddit should be, as you want it to be one that is politically correct and trea…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:16 AM
-3

Yes, but it is generally applied to other scenarios.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:13 AM
-3

No. I have principles. Innocent men are sent to prison for shit like this because people let emotions cloud their reason.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:13 AM
-4

That is an article submission. I summarized the article in the title. I post plenty of articles I don't necessarily agree with, and I sometimes sensationalize the titles to attract attention. Is that all you've got? I'm still waiting for the evidence of how I want r/MR to be a "haven of misogyny" as well.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 03:00 AM
-4

As long as ignatiusloyola encourages this kind of behavior, it will continue, just as he likes. The Good Men Project comment section is probably more friendly to males than this sub-reddit has been since ignatiusloyola was handed moderator powers. That's because TGMP actually moderates anti-male trolling, from what I've heard.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 02:56 AM
-10

No. The later information did not confirm whether the activity was rape or not. Not enough info. Being aggressive does not equal rape. Here is an example of what a real rape looks like: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lTVqxVQpgfQ
/r/MensRights13/02/12 02:48 AM
-1

No, that is not all he said.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 02:38 AM
-3

Women aren't forced to act like children anymore than men are forced to get married to bad women. They are encouraged. And it helps that women are naturally more selfish and men are naturally more selfless. People fit into the roles that suit them best.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 02:36 AM
-2

Nah, feminism (leftism) is still alive and well in the hearts of the majority. It's just less blatant but the ends are identical.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 02:09 AM
-5

Women are not forced into anything. They choose their path. It just so happens that women tend toward infantilism as they are selfish. One might say they are dominated by the id. In a way, you are acknowledging that women are naturally childish and selfish by claiming they are "forced" when they are not. You are admitting women lack agency by nature. Amusing cognitive dissonance once again.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 02:00 AM
-5

It's pretty simple. Legolas-the-elf is harassing and trying to turn away what appears to be a passionate MRA. I do not agree with such action. It is divisive and foolish.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:55 AM
-1

Women divorce men b/c of the ease of divorce, the belief they will get custody of the children, the house, the cars. And because they are selfish. No amount of incentives forces anyone to act in a selfish manner. The situation today was caused by female selfishness. It is a symptom, not the cause itself.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:53 AM
-11

I never said "women are homophobic", liar. Nor am I a "misogynist". 99% of what jumad said is accurate, but you ignored it because your primary concern is to white knight for women in support of female supremacy. You are a liar and a troll. You cannot provide evidence to support your lie that I said "women are homophobic". You cannot provide evidence to support your lie that I want r/MR to be a "haven of misogyny". You are a liar and a troll.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:47 AM
-9

He is doing it here. He posted this response in order to encourage down-votes on jumad and to encourage people to ignore jumad's comment entirely. He is doing this because he wants to protect women. The vast majority of jumad's comment is spot on. By doing this, Legolas-the-elf is encouraging ignoring men's rights issues and women's abuses, and therefore he is a white knight. Here is what jumad said: Sometimes women, especially feminists, are completely impossible to communicate with and that is…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:40 AM
-5

Stop abusing this fucking word. Christ. Gaslighting is not 'shaming someone who disagrees with you'. Yes it is. Gaslighting is a word meant to be abused. It is generally used to excuse female behavior and falsely blame a man.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:38 AM
-14

It would be inaccurate to call that poster a rapist based on the information he gave.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:27 AM
-6

Legolas is a bit of a white knight, don't take it too hard.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:19 AM
-1

Misogyny.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:17 AM
-2

Another lie, of course.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:03 AM
2

We've already had this discussion before. You are wrong. There is no problem with a vocal minority of "misogynists". The only problem is that people assume women are oppressed and men are evil.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 01:02 AM
-2

And so you'd prefer that others remain blind?
/r/MensRights13/02/12 12:53 AM
-1

Oh so you have a problem with the source and therefore refuse to learn valuable information that could be gleaned from said source? That is very foolish. It seems you just don't wish to understand women because if you did you know you wouldn't like what you found. You are fearful, and a craven deserves no respect.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 12:46 AM
1

The comment implies that women who fail have done so solely because they followed foolish men. Whitney Houston's failure has nothing to do with following a man, it has to do with her own poor choices. Nor is it fair to claim Bobby Brown is a foolish man.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 12:45 AM
1

Yeah, it's usually a waste of time to down-vote. I prefer to do it when it actually serves a purpose. That I am constantly down-voted merely proves that many of those who disagree with me are insecure and passive-aggressive. Also, I like this comment regarding generalizations: We have to distinguish between the content of the statement “Women aren’t funny” and the statement “There aren’t women who are funny.” Conflating the two is a typical habit of leftists (and thus feminists); being nominalis…
/r/MensRights13/02/12 12:40 AM
1

My view of myself is accurate, not undeserved, as I strive to ensure all my views are accurate. I also know very well that you are a hateful, stupid, and insecure person.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 12:33 AM
-1

Fuck yourself. I'd rather understand women, avoid divorce, and look like a jerk, than not. Here's a nice link: http://www.the-spearhead.com/blog/2010/02/14/avoiding-the-fate-of-the-amc/
/r/MensRights13/02/12 12:31 AM
0

over analyzing
/r/MensRights13/02/12 12:30 AM
-1

You cannot say women are not selfish. If women were focused on doing good for society and their children, they would not divorce men and steal their children.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 12:30 AM
-2

The claim was that he threatened to rape a rape victim (survivor is an inaccurate term). That is not true. He insinuated he'd rape an SRS troll, not a rape victim, on other words he was re-trolling.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 12:28 AM
0

Only in a leftist world can intelligence be seen as a negative.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 12:26 AM
0

Lol if that were the case then the government wouldn't need to create a law for it. Furthermore my tax dollars are being used to support all this crap to push the law through as well as any future enforcement.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 12:22 AM
5

"In economic theory, moral hazard refers to a situation in which a party makes a decision about how much risk to take, while another party bears the costs if things go badly, and the party insulated from risk behaves differently from how it would if it were fully exposed to the risk." - Wikipedia
/r/MensRights13/02/12 12:17 AM
3

Cool vid.
/r/MensRights13/02/12 12:16 AM
-5

That's not rape.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 11:56 PM
-12

NOT rape, but the white knights who believe women have no personal responsibility for their actions sure came out of the woodwork.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 11:54 PM
-9

I never saw it before, but that definitely was not rape. I think that JeremiahMRA pariah dude said something about women being sluts a while back Someone doesn't know how to keep his mouth shut. In your world, women were "oppressed" 100 years ago and everything was heaven for men, misandrist.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 11:54 PM
-5

Big government leads to a police state. Socialism = fascism.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 11:45 PM
-6

This is why men ought to know Game fundamentals.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 11:40 PM
0

Weeping won't help. Humanity's scourge is people like you.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 09:06 AM
-2

A person can be a jerk one day a saint the next if they so choose. They don't often choose to change, but the fact that they do sometimes means you have to understand WHY they do the things they do, not just observe their actions. People rarely change. Haven't you noticed? Very few people are willing to regard the truth rather than cling to their delusions. 99% of people will cling to their belief system rather than question it and seek the truth. I know this from experience.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 08:58 AM
0

I am not a troll, I am just honest.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 08:52 AM
-4

No, he didn't. He was trolled. See the exchange here: http://i.imgur.com/v8q0J.png The person he is arguing with is an SRS regular.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 08:48 AM
5

The one that helps women.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 08:41 AM
0

I agree. They're just not as dumb as women.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 08:41 AM
-2

Doesn't fucking matter if they're complicated or have agency. This doesn't change that they can be generalized. All you're doing is glorifying the human species as somehow perfect. They're not, idiot.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 08:40 AM
-1

Well put.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 08:39 AM
0

No, stupid, generalizations are not innately inaccurate. What a stupid thing to say.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 08:39 AM
0

Condoms have failure rates you stupid slut.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 08:30 AM
0

bizzare Bizarre. First of all, it's very bizzare that you're editing comments after I respond to them. I do it all the time angelcakes, you aren't anything special. That is because a woman who is anorexic is obviously suffering from some serious self loathing, so having sex with you would be consistent with her mental disorder. Certainly, as are most women. Women's nature is to be self-loathing. I go for a very, very specific type of man, which you very clearly are not. Sure you do, honey. What …
/r/MensRights12/02/12 08:19 AM
1

Women are more selfish and less moral than men, statistically. Sorry buddy but it's true.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 08:14 AM
0

Lol (literally). Does my dirty Martini count? Hey man, it's your own fault for saying stupid things.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 08:12 AM
0

My notes on you: COCKPUNCHER - something off about this guy, concern troll http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/pfdo3/last_night_i_wrote_the_top_comment_in_a_xx_thread/c3p2ejq http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/plgcq/socialism_feminism_fascism_female_personality/c3qdniv?context=3 Prior to your recent outbursts, I thought you were actually quite reasonable. That is why you are not on the Idiots list. You previously were on the list of people who aren't feminists/leftists/liars, bu…
/r/MensRights12/02/12 08:08 AM
0

No. Over-simplification.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 07:56 AM
0

How can you enjoy this partner's company, since she is stupid, lazy, cheating, lying, manipulative, and selfish? I never said she was, silly girl. Ask a real question and perhaps I will answer it.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 07:44 AM
0

There are a multitude of reasons, but I do not wish to detail them. It is true that I could easily choose to rely on porn for sexual sustenance and other males for human interaction, and that is not a bad choice at all. I could also have sex with a few different women every week if I wanted to, but that bores me. I prefer to have a partner who is willing to help.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 07:37 AM
-1

Yes you damn well can.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 07:35 AM
0

I found a fairly good woman. She still has some intrinsically female flaws, but not nearly as much as most western women. I like women. I like having sex with women. I like cuddling with women. I'm just not willing to blind myself to their flaws.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 07:29 AM
0

I don't care if something is insulting, I care if it's true. Women are more selfish and less moral than men, statistically. Sorry buddy but it's true. Everything else I said in my OP is true as well. And I really don't give a shit if it offends anyone, because it should not. The truth can only offend fools and liars.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 07:25 AM
0

Who said I would exclude women from my life? Not I. Women are dumb for the most part but some of them still have attributes I enjoy. If I wasn't already committed to one I'd seduce you for the amusement factor. I once told an anorexic girl she was fat and later banged her, lol. You women and your gina tingles. You are very silly. Luckily the woman I've chosen to spend my time with is nowhere near as foolish, fickle, and naive as you are, little girl.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 07:22 AM
0

Tone down my honesty? No thank you. Anger is a code word for politically incorrect speech. I am not angry, I am disgusted, and rightly so.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 07:17 AM
1

Well I already explained why. He is amoral and evil. He does not do good, he does for himself. He doesn't even really care about anyone but himself and those who he feels he needs to remain sane. Obviously this will disgust most conservatives.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 07:16 AM
-2

Men tend to be independent, women tend to be dependent. There are biological and social factors that reinforce this. But some are opposite and some rebel against the whole thing. I agree. It's only because we know you honestly believe this that we know you aren't trolling. What is your point? Argue against the content if you have an argument against it.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 07:15 AM
0

Women are so dumb. :/
/r/MensRights12/02/12 07:11 AM
-1

No, Katie, I couldn't.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 07:02 AM
0

lol are you a woman
/r/MensRights12/02/12 06:57 AM
-3

Don't ask, tell.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 06:02 AM
1

Pooh-pooh, no one is denying that exceptions exist to the binary paradigm. As I said, <5%. The reason people claim that we aren't paying enough attention to the outliers is that this allows for a victim/oppressor lie to be put into place, in order to demonize the 95% who are normal. It just really isn't a big deal. You are blowing it out of proportion. This is what leftists do. They blow things out of proportion. It just isn't that important other than to promote the victim/oppressor PC ideology…
/r/MensRights12/02/12 05:59 AM
0

It's actually somewhat accurate. Men are generally polygamous, women are generally hypergamous.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 05:53 AM
2

Perhaps, but he is correct. When women are in danger in combat, men are far more likely to sacrifice their lives and the lives of the unit in order to rescue her. This is a danger to the mission.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 05:51 AM
1

Here's a link I found that is somewhat interesting: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2071164/Survey-shows-liberals-conservatives-watch-different-TV-shows--Jon-Stewart-Larry-Cable-Guy-new-faces-American-polarization.html It compares Democrats and Republicans rather than leftists and conservatives, but I still think it shows some key differences. For example, Republicans dislike Dexter, and I already explained why. He is an amoral, selfish, and conceited piece of shit. :)
/r/MensRights12/02/12 05:48 AM
-2

As my hero hatterami once said, Next time, why don't you try backing up your comments?
/r/MensRights12/02/12 05:42 AM
1

I would say anyone with a hidden cowboy urge of black/white justice would identify with Dexter. I can see NRA gun-nuts identifying with him, for example. No. Dexter is at heart a coward, as are leftists. He engages his kills in a very cowardly way. Small government people can identify with Dexter's belief that the justice system isn't sufficient to combat evil and we need to take it in our own hands, etc. No, small government people might initially like Dexter but would quickly grow disgusted wi…
/r/MensRights12/02/12 05:40 AM
0

just because they disagree with me Clearly that's not why. You are an idiot and a troll. That's why. It is not childish to tell the truth.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 05:22 AM
1

It is. Leftists fantasize about taking the law into their own hands. Dexter kills "bad people", which is except for 1 or 2 cases always men, often men who murder or assault women. Often Dexter could turn in those he seeks to murder, but instead waits while his target kills other innocent people, so that he can have the gratification of killing the target himself. He has repeatedly killed innocent victims or let them die, and shows no remorse because he feels he is doing it for the "greater good"…
/r/MensRights12/02/12 05:13 AM
-1

You were placed on the "Idiots" list 2 days ago. Congratulations. I don't, however, expect you to remain around here much longer. You are merely passing through. I will remain. Even though you are inconsequential in the long run and won't be here much longer, I placed you on the list due to your recent high frequency of troll posts.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 05:06 AM
-2

Freud has been widely discredited, and many modern psychologists don't really agree with him. And modern psychologists are heavily influenced by bogus leftist ideology. Freud had a lot of good points. For example the OP, penis envy, and the Electra complex. But of course, these are politically incorrect. Modern psychology is heavily influenced by PC bullshit.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 05:05 AM
1

A good point. And pop culture normalizes this, for example the leftist wet dream television series, Dexter, or any other cop show.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 05:03 AM
1

No, liberals just think government is God.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 04:54 AM
-4

That's a good little consumer whore. :P
/r/MensRights12/02/12 04:41 AM
-7

I'm following the lead of Flavor Flav. And I'm sure as shit not getting jewelry for my hoe.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 04:26 AM
0

Are you being facetious? Our culture does not actually condone rape of women. So the "men can stop rape" BS is BS. On the other hand, our culture does blame men for all ills and does relinquish women of all responsibility. So pointing out specific examples of this is totally appropriate.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 04:17 AM
11

Wouldn't it be nice if we held women accountable for their poor decisions?
/r/MensRights12/02/12 04:13 AM
3

Individual comments can provide insight into a culture.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 04:12 AM
0

Gotta love racism.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 04:10 AM
-3

He posts things all the time trying to make women/gays/trans/whoever he hates that week look inherently evil. That is a lie. You are dishonorable.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 02:45 AM
-1

has had virtually all of them proven wrong by the turn of the century. Pfft, not in this case. Plus the Electra Complex makes a whole lot of sense even if the Oedipus complex doesn't. And penis envy in women also makes sense.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 02:30 AM
1

So all in all, I think the notion of two genders is a simplification, perhaps even an abstraction, of a more complex reality. No, it is an accurate generalization that works for >95% of people, and still produces good results for the vast majority of the remaining <5%. All in all most of the talk about more than two genders is just a distraction intended to promote leftist ideas. My issues is that humans, on average, are very selfish creatures who only show some form of altruism when they expect…
/r/MensRights12/02/12 01:35 AM
-4

Freud is discounted merely because he was correct, and it's politically incorrect to be correct. After all, this means that men and women are not equal, we are not the same, and yes, women are more selfish than men. Freud knew this 100 years ago. "Modern quality studies" were wrong, telling the lie that male and female psychology is not very different, until this one came along and basically just rehashed what Freud already knew.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 01:20 AM
-6

Bargaining with a female you're in a relationship with and expecting her to follow through on an agreement when she obviously doesn't want to is a very stupid thing to do.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 01:00 AM
-2

And here you have a closed mind.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 12:48 AM
-2

We live in a fascist society where our money is stolen to ENCOURAGE hedonism. Also, in no way will your tax dollars be used in this. This is for private insurers. Pfffft. Whether it's tax dollars or not, money will be transferred from males to females to pay for their luxury of sleeping around while granting little benefit to men. And when the government takes over healthcare and forces everyone to join it, yes, it will be my tax dollars paying for women's hedonism. It's already done in a variet…
/r/MensRights12/02/12 12:46 AM
1

Thank you.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 12:44 AM
-4

Calling my statement "victim blaming" and "generalizing" and "misogyny" is not making an argument. Your responsibility is to show me how my statement is FALSE, not how it is politically incorrect.
/r/MensRights12/02/12 12:42 AM
2

I see the point you're making. I created the list based on the information from the study here. From the study: The current analysis utilizes the 15 personality scales: Warmth (reserved vs. warm), Emotional Stability (reactive vs. emotionally stable), Dominance (deferential vs. dominant), Liveliness (serious vs. lively), Rule-Consciousness (expedient vs. rule-conscious), Social Boldness (shy vs. socially bold), Sensitivity (utilitarian vs. sensitive), Vigilance (trusting vs. vigilant), Abstractn…
/r/MensRights12/02/12 12:19 AM
0

OR you could just decrease the rights of mothers, for example making it illegal for them to murder their children through abortion. I guarantee women would be a lot better behaved.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 11:48 PM
-1

There's nothing wrong with generalizing accurately.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 11:46 PM
-8

Well, I'm not a troll. I'm a valuable addition to this sub-reddit. You, on the other hand, do nothing but troll. So regarding my comment: If you take issue with a claim, address it legitimately, free of sarcasm and mischaracterizations. You might get more respect that way.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 11:44 PM
1

Why should I play by other people's rules? My goal is to change the rules.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 11:36 PM
-9

You are a troll sir.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 11:35 PM
2

Does the original article support that females are more self indulgent. It wasn't originally in your list. This one: Men are more rule-conscious and less expedient than women. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/16_Personality_Factors Rule-Consciousness: Expedient, nonconforming, disregards rules, self indulgent (Low Super Ego Strength) vs. Rule-conscious, dutiful, conscientious, conforming, moralistic, staid, rule bound (High Super Ego Strength)
/r/MensRights11/02/12 11:35 PM
0

You're very misogynistic.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 11:10 PM
0

Why? I don't desire my tax dollars going to women so that they may engage in unrestrained hedonism without consequence.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 11:08 PM
6

Not relevant.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 11:07 PM
0

That is not a solution.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 10:24 PM
0

more likely disregard rules for the benefit of others No. It's MALE: Rule-conscious, dutiful, conscientious, conforming, moralistic, staid, rule bound (High Super Ego Strength) vs FEMALE: Expedient, nonconforming, disregards rules, self indulgent (Low Super Ego Strength) The super-ego works in contradiction to the id. The super-ego strives to act in a socially appropriate manner, whereas the id just wants instant self-gratification. The super-ego controls our sense of right and wrong and guilt. …
/r/MensRights11/02/12 09:54 PM
-4

Also all birth control does is allow women to raw dog it and spread more STDs.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 09:24 PM
-2

I agree that BC shoudl be covered because that prevents unnecessary pregnances, however it does nothing to enforce that the woman are actually taking the pill. In other words it DOES NOT prevent unnecessary pregnancies, and should not be mandated that it's covered by insurance, and should certainly not be subsidized by tax dollars.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 09:23 PM
-1

Indeed, socialism/feminism is built on the idea that there are oppressors (men, whites, heterosexuals) who oppress their victims (women, minorities, homosexuals) and thus must be punished.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 09:18 PM
-2

He already said. It's becoming boring. As long as he doesn't have some leech of a woman feeding off his money, he really doesn't need that much to survive as a single man.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 09:06 PM
-1

As long as only women have reproductive rights, the full responsibility of preventing pregnancy should fall on women, not men. Eliminate child support and trust me, women would keep it in their pants or get an abortion, and if they didn't, well, hopefully natural selection would take care of 'em.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 09:03 PM
-1

Someone's too lazy to think.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 09:01 PM
1

Also available here: http://www.inmalafide.com/blog/2011/12/27/relationships-defined-in-just-two-words/
/r/MensRights11/02/12 09:00 PM
2

How unfortunate. I happen to know that thingsarebad is a very attractive man, however. Smart, funny, charming, and hot, everything a woman or man could hope for. Oh things, if you're out there, you know I still haven't gotten over you.... blush
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:59 PM
-11

Lol well that was dumb of him. You never bargain with a woman, they'll screw you over.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:58 PM
-3

That's why you eliminate welfare and unemployment benefits as well. Then perhaps they'd make good choices like keeping their vaginas in their pants when they can't afford children.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:55 PM
1

link plz lol
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:55 PM
2

Ferdinand Bardamu is not a white supremacist, nor he is he the sole author at InMalafide, a very nice site greatly enjoyed by myself and my buddy thingsarebad. While trolling 2x (by calling a cancer survivor ugly, or some equally ridiculous bullshit), things was asked to post his picture if he was such a cassanova. The smug jackass posted a picture named guess what? JeremiahMRA.png. Why would he do that? Link please?
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:52 PM
-1

Nothing is free.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:51 PM
-1

Nah, it has much more to do with female's not liking the fact that they are unable to get anything out of gay males: http://www.the-spearhead.com/blog/2011/02/18/gay-spearhead-reader-gay-men-and-women-are-not-natural-allies/ Females are the root of homophobia.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:50 PM
0

I wasn't bashing women, so take your white knighting elsewhere.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:46 PM
0

Since women are less rule conscious they are more likely to disregard rules and be self indulgent (be selfish rather than playing as part of the time). Being overly emotional probably just makes this worse.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:45 PM
1

What? It's true. Sorry it's not politically correct to say.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:42 PM
1

Passive aggressive? No, I'm just honest. I call a slut a slut. You're the one whining about it.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:41 PM
1

Is it just because you are so smart and they are so ignorant that they are left with their mouths hanging open whenever they are bested by your massive intelligence? Or is it that they don't want to disrupt cohesion in a group that is constantly attacked on all fronts? 1 is closer to the truth. Leftists have a belief system, not a rational ideology.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:40 PM
-3

I shouldn't have to subsidize female sluthood.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:15 PM
-6

Most people can't afford $96? Are you retarded?
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:13 PM
0

I call people on their stupidity. Some may falsely portray that as trolling. I see it as honesty.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 09:15 AM
-1

I make only legitimate points. The question is whether you are smart enough to understand them.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 09:12 AM
-8

http://www.avoiceformen.com/sexual-politics/women-men-and-the-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-83889 http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/higher/dr-paul-irwing-there-are-twice-as-many-men-as-women-with-an-iq-of-120plus-426321.html
/r/MensRights11/02/12 09:10 AM
-2

http://www.avoiceformen.com/sexual-politics/women-men-and-the-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-83889 http://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/higher/dr-paul-irwing-there-are-twice-as-many-men-as-women-with-an-iq-of-120plus-426321.html
/r/MensRights11/02/12 09:10 AM
-3

Not true.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:54 AM
-1

Ignore the truth, you aren't unique, coward.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:31 AM
0

Right wing scapegoat? Leftists are the ones demonizing muslims, silly. Obama and Romney (leftists) would love to go to war with Iran. Meanwhile, Ron Paul the conservative would like to prevent unnecessary and demonic wars.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:21 AM
-7

[troll]
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:20 AM
1

Who cares? Not important.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:06 AM
-14

Women are more emotional and less intelligent, even the "smart" ones.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:04 AM
1

?
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:02 AM
0

The right and the leftist are little different, as defined by the mainstream. But TRUE conservatives such as Ron Paul want limited government.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:02 AM
2

You should be disappointed in what the generation of the late 19th century and early 1900s did as well. That is where it all started.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 08:00 AM
-4

Excellent point. Women are very homophobic. Posted it here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/pkkoi/women_are_homophobic_women_were_more_tolerant/
/r/MensRights11/02/12 07:56 AM
-1

Political correctness is leftist. Some rightists do use men as scapegoats, others do not.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 07:53 AM
1

If you're living in the western world, this statement isn't true: If she bugged out, I would get custody and cash, she cant make up stuff about me.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 07:51 AM
1

But this is what you said: Except the part where you admitted you were his alt Which I did not. And I continue to not do so. Because I think it's funny that you accuse me, and you are never banned for trolling.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 07:49 AM
1

It is the year 2081. Because of Amendments 211, 212, and 213 to the Constitution, every American is fully equal, meaning that no one is stupider, uglier, weaker, or slower than anyone else. The Handicapper General and a team of agents ensure that the laws of equality are enforced Isn't it simultaneously amazing and pathetic that not only did people know what was in store for us decades ago but that people have done NOTHING to stop it?
/r/MensRights11/02/12 07:48 AM
-1

trollololololol
/r/MensRights11/02/12 06:34 AM
0

Proof plz (luckily I know you have none).
/r/MensRights11/02/12 06:34 AM
0

Nope.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 05:34 AM
-16

It's too bad women are less intelligent than men in reality.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 05:32 AM
2

You are very much an asshole and I'm sorry to say I ever associated with or supported you.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 05:30 AM
0

Some think so. Some also think I am an alt account of MrStinkybutt, TheEnlightener, ReluctantNihilist, and JayHammers.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 05:29 AM
-3

Wrong and wrong, as already shown.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 05:28 AM
2

Realize that men and women are different and stop trying to force them to be equal through government.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 05:28 AM
1

That my name is Jerry.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 05:13 AM
2

:\ I don't think so.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 05:10 AM
-4

Because it is important. If you have a counterpoint and you're not just trolling, please provide it. Though I've never seen your name before.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:56 AM
1

Let me make this perfectly clear. I don't care what your position about any issue other than Men's Rights is. You could be a nazi or feminist or satan worshiper and I wouldn't give a shit. That's very stupid. If nazism, feminism, or satan worshipping harm or help men's rights, then they are important. Leftism hurts men's rights; thus it is important. Leftism is an ENEMY to men's rights as much as feminism is, and feminism IS leftism, and leftism IS feminism (already discussed in the link I provi…
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:51 AM
7

Yes. http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0029265#s4 Women are more sensitive and less utilitarian than men. Women are more warm and less reserved than men. Women are more apprehensive and less self-assured than men. Men are more emotionally stable and less reactive than women. Men are more dominant and less deferential than women. Men are more rule-conscious and less expedient than women. Men are more vigilant and less trusting than women. You can consult the follo…
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:48 AM
0

I laughed because that is the way it is, some fellas are lucky and some ain't. She gave her statement and we took it down but I honestly never even followed up to see if it mattered or if the guy lived long enough for it to even pretend to matter. There are a lot of things wrong with what you posted. Trust me, being a stubborn asshole is a good thing, but you are doing it the wrong way, and you are wrong.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:47 AM
2

It is not the tone but the content that is a problem. And not just your apparently blatant disregard for other men's lives (as presented in your OP), but also your foolish and shortsighted ideas about how we should respond to men's rights issues.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:46 AM
-1

There DOES need to be. Leftism = feminism = fascism. I already gave a link so I'm not sure why I have to do it again: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/pjdih/the_woman_communism_theory/c3pvkfl
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:40 AM
1

Maybe you should work on your presentation, then, dumbass, because that's not at all the impression you gave. How much money do you make a year sending innocent men to jail, by the way? Do you run a website for the falsely accused like Pierce Harlan? Are you Marc Angelucci? Yeah, I didn't think so. How much money have you donated to men's rights organizations? You do the bare minimum to calm your conscience, and that isn't exactly noble. Meanwhile you're trying to come here to tell us to fall in…
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:36 AM
1

I'm not.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:28 AM
1

You are a terrible troll. I laughed because that is the way it is, some fellas are lucky and some ain't. She gave her statement and we took it down but I honestly never even followed up to see if it mattered or if the guy lived long enough for it to even pretend to matter. I laughed because that is the way it is, some fellas are lucky and some ain't. She gave her statement and we took it down but I honestly never even followed up to see if it mattered or if the guy lived long enough for it to ev…
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:27 AM
-1

Hm?
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:26 AM
1

See the following: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/pkbfr/what_i_see_as_the_problem_with_rmens_rights/c3q1zvz
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:22 AM
2

Well seeing as I have principles I would have done everything in my power to prevent that. You, on the other hand, just want $$. This is why you are evil. OThomson and I can agree on that, even though we disagree on how to solve the problem of people like you.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:21 AM
-1

Well, certainly, but there are really very few women who can accept the reality of the differences between men and women. Look at typhonblue, even. She thinks every woman is like her: masculine. Even my woman gets offended to some degree when I point out the differences between men and women, and she's one of the good ones, all things considered. There are very, very few women out there who will accept an MRA who is open about his opinions on the innate differences between men and women. If I wa…
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:15 AM
1

I saw her coach her kid through the whole trial knowing this was gonna be the result. I have principles. You do not.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:14 AM
1

Every sub-reddit is a circlejerk, dipshit. I thought this was about advocating for men's rights within the legal system. You thought wrong. Men's rights are not limited merely to the legal system. Cink_susro the Almighty: I once had a women who's husband was going away for life (this was some white middle class fuddy-duddy) on a child molestation charge. 35 minutes after he was put away for life on what I believed to be some terrible evidence his wife walked into my office and admitted she had t…
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:11 AM
2

I once had a women who's husband was going away for life (this was some white middle class fuddy-duddy) on a child molestation charge. 35 minutes after he was put away for life on what I believed to be some terrible evidence his wife walked into my office and admitted she had talked the kid into it because he had slapped her. I laughed as she was crying. My boss (now partner) told her it didn't really matter now, as by the time appeals got slapped together he would most likely be dead, well beca…
/r/MensRights11/02/12 04:02 AM
3

A women? :) I know how to work for men's rights already. I've been around for years. What makes you think you have anything to teach me? We've had this discussion a million times, fool, while you were busy jacking off elsewhere in your ignorance. You aren't contributing anything new or interesting. So why should I care what you think? Here are some links regarding this topic: http://www.the-spearhead.com/2010/04/18/be-extreme-and-unreasonable/ http://www.the-spearhead.com/2011/01/27/should-men-t…
/r/MensRights11/02/12 03:56 AM
3

Read the title line and the TL;DR, read the OThomson response, and down-voted the OP. Have an up-vote, O.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 03:39 AM
2

I avoided sticking my dick in very crazy women, partly through luck, partly through knowledge, and party through being very discriminating when it came to who I slept with. Of course, I still had my interactions with plenty of somewhat crazy women, as any man is wont to do.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 03:16 AM
3

Indeed. You never should have given up control of this sub-reddit.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 03:03 AM
-1

You are an anti-men's rights troll. Therefore I doubt you and down-vote you.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 03:02 AM
1

I am. It is a happy marriage without any of the threats other marriages face. (If she bugged out, I would get custody and cash, she cant make up stuff about me). Howso?
/r/MensRights11/02/12 02:57 AM
-2

Sad, ain't it?
/r/MensRights11/02/12 02:45 AM
1

Yes. Note also that this plays well into natural male and female psychology. Women enjoy being protected and cared for by men, and men enjoy protecting and caring for women. Or, more accurately, women enjoy being protected and cared for (no matter by whom, even by faceless government), and men enjoy protecting and caring for women and their children, and are devastated when they are betrayed by those they would give their lives to protect.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 02:42 AM
3

Lots of trolls here who the moderators refuse to ban and who down-vote good articles. :/
/r/MensRights11/02/12 02:36 AM
0

To a feminist it is, unless the guy is attractive. :)
/r/MensRights11/02/12 02:35 AM
1

There are things a male teacher could do in the situation, they may be constrained by fear of retaliation and false accusations from the student but that doesn't mean the teacher is powerless. The teacher is largely powerless. He could bring it to someone's attention but nothing would be done about it. More likely it would result in problems for him with the faculty or with the girl. The female teacher in the above situation could have been afraid of retaliation and the male student tracking her…
/r/MensRights11/02/12 02:34 AM
4

I tried organising a men’s rights group in a similar setting some time back, and experienced exactly the same thing. The young men were reluctant to take part, not because they couldn’t see the valid point of men’s rights, but because they (rightly) feared that publicly putting their own interests as men on the same level as that of women would make them unpopular with women – in other words, women would exercise their sexual power to choose to fuck other men, the men who wouldn’t stand up for t…
/r/MensRights11/02/12 02:32 AM
4

Funny, they don't find father daughter incest too ugly to sensationalize.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 02:10 AM
-2

Well, I hope so. The alternative is global fascism and slavery. A collapse and reconstruction would be much preferred to that. Toasts with his very, very dry Hendrick's Martini. Who else would drink gin after Islay single malt scotch? Ha ha!
/r/MensRights11/02/12 02:08 AM
0

Your comment before you deleted it: That's COMPLETELY unfair. You're assuming that all women are the same or would react the same way, given a situation. This is not so. Your completely defeatist attitude is disappointing, and does not make for a very good argument. No I'm not. I do think it is quite likely that a female in this culture who is willing to submit a paper to a teacher detailing fantasies about him, knowing he can do nothing about it, is also quite likely to be willing to assert her…
/r/MensRights11/02/12 01:56 AM
0

It's quite true. Socialism = feminine = fascism. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/pjdih/the_woman_communism_theory/c3pvkfl This whole leftist movement that has taken over the western world, political correctness, "affirmative action", big government socialism, it all can be described as feminization of the culture. Everything is about feelings now. And the end result of all this is pure and utter fascism. In other words, leftism = fascism. You know this subconsciously or you wouldn't …
/r/MensRights11/02/12 01:55 AM
-2

Indeed. And the sad thing is that instead of having the strong males mate and the weak males die out, it's even worse: the irresponsible, foolish, and easily brainwashed males mate like kings, while the intelligent, wary, and hardy males have few if any children!
/r/MensRights11/02/12 01:52 AM
1

The teacher would have given her an A and hoped she didn't file sexual harassment charges because he'd know that making a fuss about it could only result in himself being blamed and harassed for "over-reacting", and giving anything less than an A would invite retaliation by the female, who, having a crush on him, could potentially use her uniquely female power to accuse him against him. He'd thanks his lucky stars if the problem just went away and he could keep teaching.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 01:49 AM
0

It is possible to harass in a sexual nature, but most instances of accused "sexual harassment" today are not harassment at all, and the current usage of the term ignores female-type sexual advances while only demonizing male-type sexual advances. I believe we are largely in agreement.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 01:47 AM
0

There is harassment, there is no 'sexual' harassment. They just add the 'sexual' in the front to make the male sound perverted and easier to demonize. And expressing attraction for one is not harassment.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 01:05 AM
-5

Have an up-vote, but realize that this mentality is the fault of leftism.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 01:04 AM
-7

Have an up-vote, but realize that this mentality is the fault of leftism.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 01:03 AM
2

And manginas who are repeatedly rejected by women are getting "hangovers" so much that they decide to stop taking the drug of female worship, then they figure out that they have to be jerks to get women and learn a little Game.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 12:19 AM
3

Thanks for this! Political Correctness is cultural Marxism. It is Marxism translated from economic into cultural terms. First of all, both are totalitarian ideologies. The totalitarian nature of Political Correctness is revealed nowhere more clearly than on college campuses, many of which at this point are small ivy covered North Koreas, where the student or faculty member who dares to cross any of the lines set up by the gender feminist or the homosexual-rights activists, or the local black or …
/r/MensRights11/02/12 12:15 AM
-1

Sexual harassment is a bullshit term designed to criminalize male sexual attraction when females don't want it. This never would have happened if a female had written something about a male teacher. PS: NiceGuysSTFU is an anti-male troll so take his words with a grain of salt.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 12:12 AM
1

Surprise he's male!
/r/MensRights11/02/12 12:09 AM
0

What the fuck is a sex surrogate? Oh, looks like Libturds! answered this question for me: So, Progressive Liberals have created the word "Sex Surrogate" now to dance around illegal prostitution?
/r/MensRights11/02/12 12:09 AM
5

Not our problem. We cannot cure people's bigotry and ignorance, that's their responsibility. Don't look for people with closed minds. Look for people with open minds. "Never teach a pig to sing. You'll only waste your time and annoy the pig." or "Give not that which is holy to dogs, neither cast ye your pearls before swine, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn again and rend you."
/r/MensRights11/02/12 12:05 AM
1

If they have a nice selection of high end whiskey they should have it. Sip it either neat or with a slash of water in a rocks glass. You could add some ice if that's too much for you but it will dull the flavor somewhat.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 12:03 AM
0

I highly doubt any of the highly publicized cases in the media where a girl claims a bunch of guys gang raped her are genuine. Just gang bangs that the girl got caught and was ashamed.
/r/MensRights11/02/12 12:00 AM
0

troll post
/r/MensRights10/02/12 07:34 PM
1

Ardbeg is best, followed by Lagavulin. Caol Ila is a nice alternative as well if it's significantly cheaper than the other two. Laphroaig is another example but it is stronger, not as well balanced. You can get shots of these at good bars, but they'll be very expensive. If you like strong whiskey and you don't mind something that tastes like lighter fluid and charcoal, get a bottle instead. It'll cost you $50 - $100 in the US. SPECS in TX has Ardbeg for only $50 which is a great deal, while it i…
/r/MensRights10/02/12 07:31 PM
0

Weak minds might think so.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 07:27 PM
-1

Yes, it is slavery if one person contributes nothing and leeches off the other. It is not a fair trade.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 07:27 PM
2

There is a free download link on the page. From an Amazon review: This book argues that the academic meltdown in our public education system is intentional. It asserts that change agents have been working at the Education Department to change curriculum, not to improve teaching but to promote a socialist agenda. Their role is to create schools which will mold obedient citizens who no longer have the knowledge and skills to improve their lot in life, but are dependent on governement/multi-nationa…
/r/MensRights10/02/12 06:54 PM
-5

You are correct that women are inherently communist. Communism is a very feminine idea, because women want to be taken care of by others. This is why when women are granted the right to vote a socialist welfare state ensues. Read the comment by Perseus here: http://www.avoiceformen.com/sexual-politics/women-men-and-the-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-83886 Here is an excerpt: ‘Feminists’ assail ‘property’ as a construct. The reason for this I think can be traced back to the following. Male social …
/r/MensRights10/02/12 06:18 PM
1

Of course feminism is totalitarian, socialism is totalitarian.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 06:15 PM
1

Ooh yeah, ooh yeah Nothing really matters Anyone can see Nothing really matters - nothing really matters to me Anyway the wind blows...
/r/MensRights10/02/12 09:07 AM
-8

I'm anti-slavery.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 09:05 AM
-15

You sound like a walking wallet.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 07:53 AM
0

men should be like this Generally men are better off masculine. women should be like that Generally women are better off feminine. trans men are never real men Agreed. article actually insults someone as a faggot Jack Donovan is a homosexual. He has a specific definition of the term "faggot" that is not exclusive to homosexuals, as he describes here: For the record, my application of the term “faggot” is inclusively pansexual, and that usage seems to be increasingly common among men. Homosexuali…
/r/MensRights10/02/12 07:45 AM
-1

Most men should be like that, and most women should adhere to the traditional female role. These ways of acting are healthiest for most men and women and thus ought to be encouraged.
/r/MensRights10/02/12 05:49 AM
-4

I believe actual rapes of women are incredibly rare and that almost all supposed rapes of women outside of prison, reported to the police or not, cannot accurately be called rapes but rather poor decision making on the part of the female (for example, slut goes out, gets drunk, brings home guy, consents to sex but isn't really totally into it, calls it rape the next day) or just outright lies. No, I don't believe there is any epidemic of rape of females in this country, although there is an epid…
/r/MensRights10/02/12 05:20 AM
-2

http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/pfvp9/definition_of_a_man/c3p26az
/r/MensRights09/02/12 11:19 PM
1

Oh I'm sure you believe some of the things you say, but that doesn't change the fact that you're trolling.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 11:18 PM
1

You are a troll. We both know it. No one else is reading this. Kindly fellate yourself.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 10:19 PM
1

If a non-troll asks I'll be happy to provide some information.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 10:14 PM
-4

Enjoying romance movies is a very feminine thing, as they cater to women's tastes. So a man who really enjoys them has been feminized.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 10:10 PM
-7

Nothing at all, and nobody thinks so. Trollololol. It is politically incorrect to be a manly man. It's too "macho". Manly men are portrayed as Neanderthals. Yes, there are inherently masculine and feminine characteristics. You may just be a somewhat manly woman. PS: Do you like sipping Islay malts? Because very few women do.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 10:04 PM
1

Yeah...
/r/MensRights09/02/12 09:51 PM
1

I didn't say otherwise. I just said women cause more divorce, because they do.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 09:50 PM
2

Thinking with your brain is a very masculine thing to do.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 09:50 PM
14

I like the comment near the end about Earl Weaver. Earl Weaver, the long-time manager of the Baltimore Orioles who’s now in baseball’s Hall of Fame.... Mr. Weaver was ejected from over 90 regular season games in his illustrious career because he constantly argued with umpires, often in the most operatic fashion.... An umpire once revealed that when he and his colleagues worked games with Mr. Weaver managing, they were a little more careful to make correct calls. So to all the people who think we…
/r/MensRights09/02/12 09:09 PM
4

Excellent article. The left's political correctness is an enemy to men's rights.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 09:06 PM
1

Troll. You've been trolling for months, why aren't you banned yet? Three months ago.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 09:03 PM
4

Ignore NiceGuys, he is a feminist troll who loathes masculine traits and glorifies feminine ones.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 08:53 PM
0

The feminized culture expects men to be effeminate like women. A man who remains masculine in the face of cultural influence is standing against this feminization and therefore is politically incorrect and must be destroyed. For information on the topic of masculinity see my post here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/pfvp9/definition_of_a_man/c3p26az For most men, they'd be happier masculine and confident in themselves than feminine and weak. The culture that feminizes men is actuall…
/r/MensRights09/02/12 08:53 PM
3

I'm just saying that pedophilia does NOT depend on where you live. It is a well-defined term and completely separate from the age of consent which often penalizes completely normal human sexual desire, which is different from desire for children.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 08:35 AM
3

The short answer is that late-20th century Western culture is extremely hostile towards the values of classical masculinity. Male role models in pop culture are either effeminate prigs or clueless buffoons. Schools are replacing the competitive environments men thrive in with quiet, heavily-structured self-esteem factories that cajole little boys into acting like little girls, while drugging those who can’t be so easily tamed. The American economy is shedding jobs in manufacturing, mining and th…
/r/MensRights09/02/12 08:16 AM
2

Pedophilia is sexual desire solely for children. It is not sexual desire for those who have hit puberty, which is utterly normal.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 08:07 AM
0

Generalizations that are accurate are not irrational, silly. Fathers cause divorces far less often than women, they seek sole custody far less often than women, they seek child support far less often than women, in all, fathers appear to be far better than mothers when it comes to children, based on statistics. This is a normative statement, not a universal one. Don't confuse the two.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 08:03 AM
-1

Nothing wrong with that, other than the fact that you are apologizing for it. As I said, it's not very manly to apologize for one's ideas or actions without just cause. Why should you care what I think about your water colors? And that's why I'm not apologizing for some crap you accuse me of. Hating women? Please. You're an asshole for saying that BS. Not very manly of you.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 08:00 AM
2

A cool word for coward.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 07:33 AM
7

I understand lichitea's opinions. She hates men and believes in feminism. Don't be stupid.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 07:33 AM
-1

Hey chowpie, you need to get banned.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 07:32 AM
5

Yes there is. Feminism is what it is, based on what it does, which we can easily observe.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 02:31 AM
6

No, the feminist/anti-male/SRS trolls just need to be banned. It's very simple, very easy, and very effective.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 02:29 AM
9

Why aren't you banned yet?
/r/MensRights09/02/12 01:41 AM
8

There is no perspective but the truth.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 01:41 AM
-2

Did you know that women who get pregnant relieve their menstrual cramps? Even God thinks women should be barefoot and pregnant.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 01:40 AM
2

Well put. Kind of sums up everything that's wrong with the modern world.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 12:48 AM
1

Oh, and AboutMensRights, the same guy who made that sub-reddit documenting ignatiusloyola's activities, made a post previously about why it is an effective strategy to ban trolls rather than to ignore them, here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/p3evt/just_to_reiterate_please_do_not_post_links_to_srs/c3mmsri?context=3 At this point, since ignatiusloyola is not going to give up, the best thing to do is to remain aware of his bias, raise awareness, and check the "new" section frequently…
/r/MensRights09/02/12 12:43 AM
1

Well, I personally think the anti-male trolls should be downvoted instead of banned. We have so many trolls here who are very active that what happens instead is the trolls win the down-vote war. The voting system does not work here. He has banned numerous MRAs who he antagonized first. It's all here: http://www.reddit.com/r/aboutmensrights He has repeatedly threatened to ban me as well. Here's some history on that: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/ohpc3/a_woman_who_supports_mens_righ…
/r/MensRights09/02/12 12:37 AM
0

Won't happen, ignatiusloyola refuses to do anything about it. He's much quicker to ban MRAs than he is feminist trolls. Thus far he has repeatedly refused to take advice regarding this matter. It is because it is his intent to move this sub-reddit toward a more PC-friendly place where feminists are welcome and MRAs who are not egalitarian (an impossible ideal) are not. This is because ignatiusloyola is more a feminist or egalitarian than he is an MRA.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 12:29 AM
1

Oh I don't mind choosing to call a tranny a man if I believe the term applies. But I won't be forced to do so, which is what some demand.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 12:28 AM
5

Anti-male trolls are allowed to troll here again and again. Meanwhile MRAs who ignatiusloyola disagrees with personally, such as myself, are harassed and threatened with bans, and several have already been banned. In this way the dialogue is controlled by ignatiusloyola, and it becomes less friendly to MRAs and more friendly to feminists and trolls.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 12:26 AM
-1

No you are just apologetic for being a man. I am not.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 12:24 AM
1

Make better choices.
/r/MensRights09/02/12 12:17 AM
2

Divorce rate 5% vs 50%. Having control of one's family vs having absolutely no power in the home over one's wife or one's children. And how many men were beaten to an inch of their lives by women back then and if they ever alluded to the violence, they would be publicly ridiculed and humiliated? If my woman hit me back then I'd hit the bitch right back and then we wouldn't have a problem anymore. These days I have no power to do so unless I want to be imprisoned and lose my family. And women kno…
/r/MensRights09/02/12 12:04 AM
3

I'm not paying for a movie that's not only going to be utter crap but also promotes misandry and gynocentrism. No one here should.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 11:56 PM
19

Say what you want about feminists, they get the job done.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 11:53 PM
2

Ineffective obviously. Over the last few months the troll problem has gotten worse due to this policy of doing nothing about it.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 06:33 PM
1

Ineffective obviously. Over the last few months the troll problem has gotten worse due to this policy of doing nothing about it.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 06:33 PM
2

/r/AgainstMensRights There was a list of active posters in the past.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 06:31 PM
-6

Yeah, there are a lot more feminists and mangina trolls here because ignatiusloyola encourages them. That's to your liking I see. Me, I don't see any value in keeping do-nothing concern trolls around.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 06:29 PM
2

We've already discussed this, typhon. Maybe you should listen this time instead of perpetuating more falsehoods. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/p3jqy/why_i_dont_call_myself_a_feminist_genderratic/c3mlnq5 Was having a wife and family who stuck by you through thick and thin and being able to raise your children as you saw fit and actually HAVE children who could grow up free... was that worth working hard to care for them and perhaps putting my life on the line to defend my family? Ye…
/r/MensRights08/02/12 06:24 PM
1

This story is still about a father losing custody. Without more info it's hard to say how much of a factor the outsider/foreigner issue is, but rest assured being male is a negative when it comes to such battles. Thanks for the info.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 05:49 PM
-2

No. That's a rather stupid thing to say. Just because a few TwoXers up-vote the post talking about how TwoX is sexist doesn't mean TwoX isn't sexist, it just means it's true. There were also plenty of other posts in that thread that outed TwoX's sexism but were down-voted.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 05:46 PM
-5

And you're concern trolling again, Mr. White Knight. Apparently calling out women's sexism is "hating women". :/
/r/MensRights08/02/12 05:45 PM
0

Troll lol.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 05:45 PM
-6

Most people who make such claims are in fact feminists and/or trolls. What was this point you disagreed with?
/r/MensRights08/02/12 05:44 PM
6

You are a troll, NiceGuys. Everyone agrees, from lefties to conservatives. You should be banned. Example from three months ago: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/lbaz3/please_read_need_assistance/c2rau26?context=3 And you're still alive and well, trolling along unscathed, the moderators doing nothing about it. Which is exactly why this place is inundated with trolls today.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 05:42 PM
1

They ought to be banned.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 05:42 PM
0

Well said.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 09:37 AM
1

It's actually a good point because the reason feminists claim rape is about power is that they project female views on sex onto men. See the following article: http://www.the-spearhead.com/2011/03/26/patriarchy-porn-and-rape-mistakes-of-feminism/ You were likely down-voted by trolls.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 09:32 AM
3

I wanted to tell you in the future you might get better answers by searching Google. For example, that's how I just found this fine article on the subject: http://www.the-spearhead.com/2011/03/26/patriarchy-porn-and-rape-mistakes-of-feminism/ I found this by searching: is rape about power site:the-spearhead.com Some other good queries are: is rape about power site:avoiceformen.com is rape about power "men's rights" You'll often get better answers like this than by relying on a sub-reddit that is…
/r/MensRights08/02/12 09:29 AM
-4

Regarding TwoX's sexism: http://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/mz4n4/this_may_be_a_bit_taboo_but_comments_like_this/c353lft http://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/mz4n4/this_may_be_a_bit_taboo_but_comments_like_this/c353qnm http://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/mz4n4/this_may_be_a_bit_taboo_but_comments_like_this/c353sww
/r/MensRights08/02/12 09:16 AM
-4

All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Even worse when supposedly NOT sexist women donate to anti-male organizations and give nothing to pro-male alternatives when provided the opportunity. TwoX is full of women who want to feel good about appearing to do good and be pro-male when in reality they are perfectly happy with perpetuating misandry and gynocentrism. Here's a nice link on the topic of TwoX's sexism: http://www.reddit.com/r/TwoXChromosomes/comments/mz…
/r/MensRights08/02/12 09:12 AM
2

You are absolutely correct. Here's a comment on the topic from the following link: http://www.avoiceformen.com/2011/05/06/slutwalks-stupidity-in-a-tube-top/ As I understand it, feminists want rape to be about power so that women can be absolved of any blame. Paul Elam's response: Totally correct. ALL feminist theory, from DV to rape, to phony wage gaps, to so called rape “culture” is an extension of Patriarchy Theory, asserting that all these problems stem from male hegemony over women. It ALWAY…
/r/MensRights08/02/12 09:08 AM
1

Did you know all white people are evil as well?
/r/MensRights08/02/12 09:00 AM
5

Being a man isn't even really about fulfilling the social contract, it's about being healthy psychologically. Most men cannot truly satisfied with themselves if they act like women, effeminate, rather than masculine. Masculinity is really what we're talking about, and it does have a meaning. I wrote about it elsewhere in this thread.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 08:48 AM
1

Come to think of it, a discussion on what it means to be a man is really just a discussion on masculinity. Certain groups wish masculinity to be anything and everything, to have no definition, in other words for men to be androgynous and have no identity. These groups will demonize true masculine characteristics in an effort to destroy masculinity as it is. edit: Some info on masculinity. It is what femininity is not. http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0029265#s4 …
/r/MensRights08/02/12 08:28 AM
-7

And after having been warned of PP's misandry, they ignore it and still donate. That's sexism.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 08:20 AM
-3

As long as Planned Parenthood treats fathers as walking wallets with no rights, they are anti-male.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 08:19 AM
-3

I just want it to be an effective word with an established definition. A man is someone who wants to be treated as a man. In other words, you want it to be meaningless. No, an individual does not get to just decide what a man is. Reality decides what a man is, and it is the culture's responsibility to describe that reality.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 07:16 AM
7

I like this. You can never be a whole man if you lie to yourself.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 07:14 AM
-2

There are a few definitions of "man". Men are male human beings. They are definitely not female human beings who have had surgery and taken hormones. Trans "men" are certainly not men. We get a few trolls around here who insist that they are and that we buy into their delusion. I don't suggest you spend too much time with them. Another aspect is differentiating between man and boy. This differentiation is fluid and also takes context into play. Some you might call men act like boys and some you …
/r/MensRights08/02/12 07:10 AM
16

Props to him for putting forth the effort. It does have an effect.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 06:55 AM
-1

Lol.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 06:53 AM
-2

Limited government that protects liberty and does little else would not allow such things.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 06:52 AM
-4

That is not the reality. Planned Parenthood exists in reality and therefore we must judge their actions based on that reality, not on what should be or what would be nice. I question why you are getting any up-votes for that response.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 06:49 AM
2

Japan prepares to sign the Hague convention (mandating return of children abducted by a parent) In other words Japan prepares to sign the Hague convention (mandating return of children abducted by a father only)
/r/MensRights08/02/12 06:04 AM
-2

What?
/r/MensRights08/02/12 02:22 AM
-9

Have you ever seen Star Trek TNG? It presents a leftist utopia as achievable and glorifies leftist ideology. And leftists are anything but logical.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 02:05 AM
-4

The dirty little secret is that Planned Parenthood is a corrupt federally funded “charitable” institution that employs thousands of feminists, under the guise of “women’s health needs”, while discriminating against mens’s health needs. This assumes “pregnancy” is a health “need” that requires a “cure”. Your tax dollars go directly to women’s health (babies are a “health” problem), NOT to men’s health. Impoverished men are on their own, expendable. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/p9q9…
/r/MensRights08/02/12 01:58 AM
0

SWAT teams, highest incarceration rate in the world, ignoring the constitution, no-knock warrants, the PATRIOT ACT, NDAA. None of this is possible without the big government police state which is extremely anti-male.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 01:57 AM
2

I was once a feminist. You still are a feminist. You still believe women were oppressed 100 years ago and that the feminism movement achieved good things. You believe that conservatives are evil. Yes?
/r/MensRights08/02/12 01:54 AM
-16

Meanwhile they'll donate a bunch of money to an anti-male organization like Planned Parenthood but absolutely nothing to men's organizations. TwoX is full of sexist women. Who cares if they pretend to agree on minor things when they put all their money and effort into misandry.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 12:21 AM
-3

This is what happens when the people let big government run their lives: a police state with no freedom.
/r/MensRights08/02/12 12:18 AM
0

Let those idiots figure it out, not the court system on the taxpayer's dime.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 07:32 AM
1

Yes, a distraction from real issues like erosion of rights and voter fraud.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 07:16 AM
-1

Women only care about themselves, and men only care about women.
/r/MensRights07/02/12 07:16 AM
7

Throw the Jew down the well, so my country can be free, we will grab him by his horns, then we have a big party!
/r/MensRights07/02/12 12:02 AM
-2

I'll not be censored, little one-day-old troll. I will continue to tell the truth about anything and everything harmful to men's rights. It helps the cause immensely to realize that big government is the primary enforcer of misandry.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 11:25 PM
1

Bbbut feminism is about equality!!
/r/MensRights06/02/12 10:01 PM
2

Also note that Oikos = Dannon.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 10:00 PM
1

Truth is truth. And leftism is inherently wrong.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 08:57 PM
0

And western cultural mores corrupt Islamic culture.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 08:55 PM
1

No, all I care about is the truth. Part of that truth is that leftism is inherently immoral and wrong in every way, while conservatism has plenty of good qualities but may not be perfect.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 08:25 PM
1

No I don't. This victim/oppressor thing is leftist. You get behind ignatiusloyola no matter what he does because you agree with his ideology, not his policies. I never outright support someone I disagree with just because I share some ideology with them. As a true conservative all I care about is the truth.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 08:21 PM
-4

We should just have some equality and outlaw abortion. Then we can say to women: Take a pill if you don't want children - wear a condom if you don't want STD. How simple is that?
/r/MensRights06/02/12 08:06 PM
1

Understood. I just usually see you toe the party line, claiming that leftists can do no wrong and conservatives are evil.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 08:02 PM
0

It's also worth noting that this tendency to want to be taken care of has been fostered through the educational system, the media, technology, and government policies that have broken down traditional social structures and family values. Individual responsibility as a value has been washed away in favor of suckling on the government teet. It's also worth noting that this represents a transition from typically masculine traits to typically feminine traits.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 07:54 PM
2

Female privilege.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 07:52 PM
1

People already have an anniversary for that sort of thing. Valentine's Day is just a way to increase western female selfishness and get people to buy things.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 07:49 PM
1

I'm letting it slip how? If the moderators don't ban trolls like this guy, why shouldn't I have a little fun trolling him right back?
/r/MensRights06/02/12 07:48 PM
1

It's true, I had a long conversation about it with him in PMs. The ONLY issue he seems to care about is gay marriage.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 07:47 PM
1

What're you babbling about?
/r/MensRights06/02/12 07:46 PM
2

I didn't say EVERY, I said most women and many men.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 07:45 PM
-1

Also keep in mind that they can only force men into this slavery through the magic of big government, an enemy to men's rights.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 07:38 PM
8

Consent to sex != consent to reproduction.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 07:35 PM
7

Poison is the weapon of women, cravens, and eunuchs, according to The Song of Ice and Fire series.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 07:32 PM
0

Gotcha
/r/MensRights06/02/12 06:08 AM
-1

You seem like a male as well.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 06:08 AM
3

That may be true, but that doesn't make it any less true that most women go for utility in exchange for sex at some point.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 06:07 AM
1

Isn't the ACLU quite leftist? I go to their website and see the following: Voting Rights»Racial Justice»Reproductive Freedom»LGBT Rights»Religion & Belief»Women's Rights» It seems like their primary purpose is to promote women's privilege over men, as well as focus on minorities, homosexuals, and atheists as superior to whites, heterosexuals, and religious folks. Demandprogress.org is a much more liberty-focused organization. ACLU just seems like it picks and chooses its battles based on leftist…
/r/MensRights06/02/12 06:04 AM
2

Hehe, you're standing against the leftist ACLU now.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 06:01 AM
2

Now we're getting the interesting commercials. And so far we have a woman slapping a man in a car commercial and another woman headbutting a guy for an Oikos yogurt commercial and then threatening him again.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 05:53 AM
-4

Well personally I can enjoy my sex life without licking strange fishy snatch.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 05:51 AM
3

are you seriously going to say that almost every single woman in the 21st century uses sex simply for utility Well, no, and that's not what I said. I said that almost all women trade sex for utility, which is true. You might also say that a large number of men trade utility for sex, and so you could refer to them as johns.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 05:48 AM
0

Don't you recognize when you're being trolled? I've done a million proofs, of course I know what QED means.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 05:46 AM
0

What is a wikipedia?
/r/MensRights06/02/12 05:46 AM
-1

What is a qed?
/r/MensRights06/02/12 04:55 AM
0

As already stated, actions speak louder than words.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 04:47 AM
0

Can you please cite some peer-reviewed studies regarding these topics? Thank you.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 04:45 AM
0

Thoughts lead to observable actions.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 04:41 AM
1

What do you mean?
/r/MensRights06/02/12 04:36 AM
0

That whole thing was just another example proving western culture is rubbish today.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 04:34 AM
-1

No, no one said anything about forcing anyone. I don't particularly care what women SAY but what they actually THINK and FEEL. Women like to be dominated. Of course, outside sources constantly tell them they should be aggressive and bitchy and resist their desire to submit, and they often do, up to a point.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 04:33 AM
-1

No thanks, left wing liar.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 04:28 AM
4

The media encourages this materialistic consumer mentality.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 04:11 AM
-3

In a way, almost all women are prostitutes, as they trade sex for utility.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 04:10 AM
-1

Don't waste mine with concern troll drivel. You are very white knightey these days.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 03:18 AM
-1

I don't care about public opinion. I called you a fool, solipsistic, deluded, homosexual (which you are), I said you sound a lot like a white nationalist since you call everyone in the Middle East a "camel fucker", simple-minded, a moron, an idiot, a dumbass, a retard, a leftist, a stupid animal, a savage, and dumb. None of these are inaccurate. And like I said, you said the following: "Freedom" is overrated. You also demonstrated that the only issue you really care about is promotion of homosex…
/r/MensRights06/02/12 03:17 AM
2

I'm a star. :)
/r/MensRights06/02/12 03:11 AM
3

We need Katherine Heigl to do a PSA.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 03:07 AM
-2

Well at least it's honest. I do find it interesting.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 03:03 AM
2

Now we're getting the interesting commercials. And so far we have a woman slapping a man in a car commercial and another woman headbutting a guy for an Oikos yogurt commercial and then threatening him again.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 01:45 AM
4

Maybe I'll get to see Madonna sing Like a Virgin - puke.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 01:01 AM
2

It's been pretty boring. It seems like they haven't put much effort into the commercials this year, almost as if they're avoiding controversy. I did see one where a model implied that guys should give their women Valentine's day gifts in return for sex. Thread here.
/r/MensRights06/02/12 12:54 AM
-1

Because it's not mob rule.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 10:31 PM
-1

Relationships are give and take, and if someone is doing all the giving, then they're nothing but a utility object.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:58 PM
0

Oh the poor wimminz, we need more government to protect them from their stupid decisions.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:56 PM
-2

Still awaiting a source demonstrating syphilis was a "serious risk" for males who "had sex with strangers".
/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:53 PM
-2

Jealousy? Silly troll, licks are for dicks.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:53 PM
-2

As long as she reciprocates, sure.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:52 PM
-2

Just don't give her anything on Valentine's Day. It's a holiday to promote consumerism, so why should you?
/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:41 PM
0

I assume that's a joke as antibiotics have no effect on HPV and can potentially weaken one's immune system.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:40 PM
-1

Depends on the gal.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:38 PM
-1

Republic.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:38 PM
-3

Warning men of the risk of throat cancer in cunnilingus? Um, yes, it's very necessary. I advise against cunnilingus with women unless you are in a long term relationship and either she has had no previous sexual partners or she gets an STD test and comes back clean. Anything else is sacrificing your personal health and safety to please a woman in a way that is totally unnecessary.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:25 PM
1

Please show me where I mentioned a perfect system.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:24 PM
1

No.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:20 PM
1

Because democracy (mob rule) has proven to be a terrible political system throughout history. That's why the US was founded as a republic, not a democracy.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:18 PM
-2

Obviously not because that's not what you said. Why do I have to explain such things. We were having a discussion regarding sex with strangers, remember? And then I said it wasn't a serious risk for males. And then you said something about dying of syphilis. So what I'm waiting for is proof that syphilis was a "serious risk for males" who "had sex with strangers". I swear to God people are getting dumber every day that I have to explain this as if to a child.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:09 PM
0

um... Because you are making faulty assumptions. I am not.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:06 PM
0

I'm a woman Knew it lol. I figured considering your anti-male bias and gynocentrism. Actually I thought you might have just been a tranny possibly too. You can always tell an effeminate person even on the internet. That's because masculinity and femininity really are real things my dear, no matter how much you would like to pretend we are all the same.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:02 PM
1

The old articles have this problem because of a Wordpress update over a year ago that messed them all up. The newer articles do not have this problem. It's most unfortunate because the older articles are some of the best ones there.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:01 PM
-3

Why would I want to TALK to a woman? I'm not interested in her thoughts.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 08:58 PM
-2

Female sexual promiscuity is a danger to society much moreso than male sexual promiscuity.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 08:58 PM
-1

I didn't make the sexes different, or women happiest as submissive to men. Blame God. There a lot of sickening things about the human species, but that isn't one of them.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 08:47 PM
-5

Eryemil is gay himself and only cares about that one issue because he is a selfish prole. He told me freedom is over-rated too.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 08:44 PM
3

I agree with it. I was having a discussion yesterday with a user who insists that trinkets, sloth, and slavery in the US are better than living free outside of the US and having control of your own life and the ability to have a family. You'd be surprised how many people think freedom is "over-rated" and that things are so much better today than they were in the past, and that the western world is vastly superior in every way to the rest of the world. Oh, the hubris.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 08:42 PM
0

Why do you think that? I can tell you why. Because you are making faulty assumptions. I am not.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 08:37 PM
3

I'm taking a page from Flavor Flav and taking my girl out for a romantic dinner at KFC.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 08:31 PM
-8

I'm sure Qanan isn't licking a snatch with HPV, but for all of you others who are considering it, I suggest against it since it's a great way to get throat cancer.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 08:31 PM
-8

It depends how you act on your sexual desires. In this case I think it's absolutely appropriate to use this against her. I get what you're saying, but I don't think there's anything wrong with how the information was used in this case based on what she actually did.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 08:05 PM
-1

Backpedalpedal
/r/MensRights05/02/12 08:05 PM
1

Source?
/r/MensRights05/02/12 08:04 PM
-1

I am a realist.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 08:00 PM
-1

Women are, generally weaker. Weaker does not necessarily mean worse. Men and women are not equal, and this is not sickening, it is just true. Also, realize that a normative statement is different than a universal statement.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 01:33 PM
-1

Also realize that if you really want an answer to your question you would click on the link and ask the author. Of course, you'd rather just troll. How noble of thee.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 01:18 PM
-1

And? (My memory is fine, you just aren't making any sense.)
/r/MensRights05/02/12 01:13 PM
-2

And as much as I would kill him if he cheated Um, she's still saying she'd kill him if he cheated. And if a man had said the same about a woman, jeez. Come on Piggy D., you can do better than this concern trolling.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 01:12 PM
-2

The color of the sky is not related to their ideology; however feminist's views on this topic are related to their ideology. I will not respond on this vacuous thread any further.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 01:09 PM
-2

It's a manifesto that would have half the earth's human population view itself as superior to the other half. Not true. Straw man. The rest of your comment is similarly without merit.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 01:08 PM
-3

our abilities and interests vary so much on an individual level. They don't vary that much within couples. I will never understand why neocons want to trap all men and women in a fantasy TV-Land version of the breadwinner/homemaker model. Trapping all men and women in ANY inflexible social model would be terrible, because our abilities and interests vary so much on an individual level. This is of course a complete mischaracterization of traditionalism designed to disparage it.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 01:05 PM
-1

I don't think it's accurate but it's a hypothesis that I had never even heard of before. You should get out more. As detailed in the rest of the comments, it is a widely accepted idea within the manosphere. I'm not particularly interested in what feminists have to say on the matter, other than as an indication of what is certainly untrue.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 01:02 PM
-2

Blacks and whites are different. The differences are far more cultural than biological, (though biological differences exist too) and they don't hold hold for every individual. True. But then, most of the differences between men and women don't hold for every individual either. Oh I certainly don't agree that most of the differences don't hold, though I would agree that they don't hold for every individual. So I'm still waiting for an explanation of how the article is "sickening".
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:58 PM
2

Actually I think it's more the types who can't stand the idea that men and women are different or that the family unit might actually have some value who are primarily down-voting this one (they're called leftists, haha). This paragraph will send any leftist into a rage: But then something happened. No, it wasn’t feminism, and no it wasn’t the entire female gender going off the deep end. Contraceptives and DNA testing removed a woman’s absolute need to offer a virgin womb to her husband – he cou…
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:54 PM
1

Gotcha
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:51 PM
-2

Says the feminist troll.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:51 PM
-3

I suggest you ask the author.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:49 PM
-3

I have no wish to further contribute to your digression.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:48 PM
-4

Women and men are different, silly.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:46 PM
-2

Equality between the sexes is a farce. Of course I don't believe in that.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:46 PM
1

We don't need to define things that are not violence as violence to protect against feminists, we need to stop defining things that are not violence as violence.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:44 PM
-4

Explain.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:43 PM
-3

I wish dissenters would actually argue against the content of submitted articles.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:43 PM
-2

Thanks to zaferk for the link
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:41 PM
1

Please, we don't need "yelling at your wife" being considered "domestic violence". Violence is physical force and nothing else, regardless of the broad politically correct leftist definition.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:40 PM
1

How do you define stranger in this context? This has always been true, it's not some sort of new postfeminist social problem. Well, not so much in the past for men. Not until the police state came about to demonize male sexuality was this as serious a risk for males.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:39 PM
1

You said: You could call it social violence. And I say you could not. AKA it is not violence.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:30 PM
-2

1) I meant you're a "little one" in terms of knowledge. In other words, ignorant. 2) That's not what I said. Try asking again without the straw man. Be precise in your language. 3) I suggest we ensure single parent households are rare by eliminating subsidization of single parenthood because it is much more difficult to raise a child in such a household than in a two-person household.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:29 PM
1

I understand, I just hesitate to call it "violence".
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:26 PM
-2

I think calling it violence is a stretch unless it leads to violence (and of course, women know very well when their words will lead to violence, as in false rape claims); otherwise I'd just call it shaming.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:24 PM
-4

Well, you see, little one, the sexes are different, and the most effective arrangement is generally one in which the father works to provide for his family while the mother cares for the children while he is away and cooks food for the father and his family.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:23 PM
-2

Why isn't that a mother's job?
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:18 PM
-1

Lots of trolls on tonight who are in favor of male rape I guess. :/
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:16 PM
-2

Sure you can, as long as the mother is doing her job, as in providing real food rather than TV dinners for the children.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:10 PM
0

Who are you talking to?
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:01 PM
-4

I found one link for you using the method I suggested, by Factory2, who you know well. http://www.the-spearhead.com/2011/02/18/gay-spearhead-reader-gay-men-and-women-are-not-natural-allies/#comment-72783 “Feminists have used homosexuality as a way to drive a wedge between gay men and other men.” WOMEN have used the ‘threat’ of homosexuality to control male behaviour, as any guy with a best friend can attest…constant snide remarks about ‘bromance’, references to the best friend as the ‘signifigan…
/r/MensRights05/02/12 11:59 AM
-2

What evidence is there that women have a role in encouraging male homophobia? I suggest you google search "women cause homophobia" and if you don't get adequate results append "site:avoiceformen.com" or "site:the-spearhead.com" to it. That should hopefully yield some results. I assumed this idea that women cause homophobia was quite common knowledge, especially since I've seen numerous articles at /r/MensRights regarding this topic in the past few years. Aside from that, you can choose not to li…
/r/MensRights05/02/12 11:56 AM
13

I am an ass, but I am a right ass. :) Thanks for putting aside differences for the greater good. That's more than some can say, as someone is going around down-voting every single submission I make tonight.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 11:48 AM
-1

Originally linked from: http://traitorsofmen.blogspot.com/2012/01/manboobz-minions-caught-attacking-male.html
/r/MensRights05/02/12 11:44 AM
3

70% FILE for divorce, while another 20% CAUSE the husband to file. Keep concern trollin' though.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 11:32 AM
-1

Well put. PC = anti-violence = anti-freedom because you are no longer to defend yourself from an aggressor, unless you are the state, of course (here comes fascism). It reminds me of an episode of Star Trek TNG. The idiot kid Wesley created a race of nano-machines that took over the ship. He could easily duplicate his work. Instead of destroying the fuckers, the PC police on the ship (the captain) refused to eradicate them and instead chose to negotiate with them. EVEN THOUGH THEY COULD EASILY B…
/r/MensRights05/02/12 11:29 AM
-3

I won't be happy until you admit that females have a role in encouraging male homophobia.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 11:27 AM
-4

Modern woman are no different . Though they may deny it, they are, in essence, overgrown children crying out for leadership because order brings comfort, security, and safety - everything women today desperately seek. Ironically, the very thing women rage against the most - submission - is the very thing they need.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 11:25 AM
-1

Here's more for ya bud Before any man gets into a relationship with a woman in the US, have him travel to Manila, Pattaya, Rio, or someplace else for a full month. See the women there. Have several. It will change the way you view American women *forever. http://markymarksthoughts.blogspot.com/2012/02/e-mail-i-received.html
/r/MensRights05/02/12 11:16 AM
0

The new law extends the definition of sex trafficking and increases penalties. There are also new training recommendations for hotel employees and cab drivers. The employees can look for warning signs in possible victims. Experts say red flags include young girls, dressed inappropriately, who seem quiet, insecure and avoid eye contact. They also say it’s suspicious when this profile of a girl checks into a hotel with no luggage.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 11:13 AM
2

Seems like you already have a presence at A Voice for Men (not surprised considering your activism). Make sure you ask around there too if you haven't already.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 11:00 AM
5

guysshouldknow Women initiate 90% of divorces. Do not get married. weddedabyss.wordpress.com
/r/MensRights05/02/12 10:52 AM
-4

With you everything is a male problem.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 10:49 AM
-7

pooh-pooh
/r/MensRights05/02/12 10:42 AM
-16

Dude, that is a really ugly piece of text. Try again, and be more concise.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 10:38 AM
-4

What do you mean?
/r/MensRights05/02/12 10:25 AM
0

From http://hereticsway.gluontheferengi.com/2012/01/16/interview-with-the-heretic/
/r/MensRights05/02/12 10:16 AM
-3

I found the picture through the following article: The difficult truth about male victims of domestic violence Maybe I should have linked this image which points it out clearly: http://i.imgur.com/WHAqj.png
/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:54 AM
-1

Violence is never an appropriate response in anything. I suppose you're for abolishing the police force and military then. And of course, you are against self-defense. After all, violence is never an appropriate response to anything. Silly leftist. :/
/r/MensRights05/02/12 09:37 AM
-1

Saw this clip and it brought to mind my post from a month ago: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/o730a/hypothetical_scenario/ So, yes, sometimes violence is the right answer to stop your friend or your lover from driving drunk.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 08:32 AM
1

Feminism is leftist, silly. Conservatism is moral, while leftism is utterly immoral. You were already provided definitions. A fool will be a fool, however.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 08:02 AM
1

Not at all. That's quite stupid. http://jonjayray.tripod.com/leftism2.html Already linked it once. Educate yourself. You don't know everything newb lol. I do hope you are a troll, otherwise it just goes to show how insidious and immoral leftism is that it actually convinces fools that it's a good thing. I'm guessing troll, though, because you'd have to be extremely cognitively dissonant to consider feminism leftist, leftism moral, and conservatism immoral.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 08:01 AM
1

Anything?
/r/MensRights05/02/12 06:28 AM
0

The trolls are a-down-votin. Nice article, thanks!
/r/MensRights05/02/12 06:18 AM
0

Surely.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 06:03 AM
0

Oh I'm sure there's a better way to go about this.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 05:58 AM
0

Oh please it's not like you do any good.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 05:54 AM
-1

"Giggles are more important than results." - Leftist saying
/r/MensRights05/02/12 05:44 AM
-9

If he posts nude pics on FetLife and sleeps around with multiple dudes while married, it's possible, though still unlikely, that the mother would be a better parent than the father.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 05:43 AM
0

A minor nuisance is the 3 seconds it takes to ban chowpie, a much more minor nuisance than FIVE different people responding to the troll multiple times.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 05:36 AM
21

The Salvation Army is extremely bigoted against males.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 05:32 AM
-2

It's cool if it's true. I do not misrepresent what people say. You do.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 05:19 AM
0

They are related. But this is true: Gay doesn't necessarily mean emasculated. I think you are too dumb to understand the subtleties of these concepts or you just really like trolling.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 05:18 AM
1

I know I've seen you around recently and you seem like an anti-feminist, but you seem really confused on what leftism is about, especially if you actually think feminism isn't leftist. Feminism is leftist to the CORE. Then again the definitions of leftism and conservatism are intentionally obfuscated these days. A quote from Demonspawn: I've always defined the conservative/liberal split this way: Conservatives will find out what causes will give them they effects they want, then try to implement…
/r/MensRights05/02/12 05:11 AM
-10

Why?
/r/MensRights05/02/12 05:06 AM
-4

My sarcasm is an accurate reflection of what chavelah said. Your sarcasm is always a straw man because you are unable to argue successfully against my points and you know it.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 05:05 AM
1

I agree. Why do you mention it?
/r/MensRights05/02/12 05:04 AM
1

Uhuh. So you think for example that the abolitionists were conservatives do you? You think the Civil Rights movement consisted of conservatives? You think it is conservatives fighting to get gay rights recognised? Oh wait maybe it's conservatives who support the workers against the bosses? You're a bit mixed up if you think any of that was about equality and not just class warfare, the staple of leftism. You're arguing abolitionists were for equality? Lol. Maybe you do think that since you're no…
/r/MensRights05/02/12 05:03 AM
4

GUYS THE PROBLEM ISN'T THE LAW IT'S THAT YOU'RE HAVING SEX, ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS STOP HAVING SEX WITH WOMEN AND IT'LL ALL BE FINE. DUH!!
/r/MensRights05/02/12 04:58 AM
-6

chavelah is a troll. I also doubt actual MRAs are up-voting this advice, it's mainly the manginas who don't donate time or money who are doing so.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 04:57 AM
1

I didn't state my stance on homosexuality. I only stated that you cannot use "love" as a reason to allow it because there are more important things like a functional society. I think it is possible that widespread homosexuality would be harmful to society just as widespread single motherhood is harmful to society. I also know that widespread promotion of homosexuality and emasculation of males IS harmful to society. Reproduction isn't an issue as there's always adoption. It doesn't impede marria…
/r/MensRights05/02/12 04:53 AM
1

Certainly.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 04:51 AM
1

Feminism is socialism with panties. Feminism relies on government power to forcefully transfer wealth from men to women and to forcefully discriminate against men. Leftism is and never has been about equality, either. It also relies on the government to forcefully transfer wealth from supposed "privileged" groups to supposed "oppressed" groups and to discriminate against the "privileged" group. You seem to have a very strange view of what it means to be leftist or conservative. With leftists, fe…
/r/MensRights05/02/12 04:48 AM
1

I never said it ONLY hurts specific groups. Also, you said: "It's not even about certain kinds of people." When obviously it is because it hurts certain groups more.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 01:51 AM
-1

smirk
/r/MensRights05/02/12 01:37 AM
1

And the consequences still affect certain people disparately based on the execution. To concentrate only on the effects rather than the cause is stupid.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 01:36 AM
1

It's not even about certain kinds of people. O rly? Because last I checked its based on physical characteristics of people such as sex and skin color.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 01:31 AM
1

And what is my ideology, oh wise one?
/r/MensRights05/02/12 01:30 AM
1

No, it doesn't hurt everyone, it hurts specific groups. That is the point. You're starting to sound like those feminists who have to specify who it hurts more. Oppression Olympics much? I am talking facts, you are talking out your ass. I sound nothing like feminists because unlike them I tell the truth. It is important to diagnose the true effects of any ailment, including affirmative action. You would like me to ignore some of these effects and pretend they do not affect different groups dispar…
/r/MensRights05/02/12 01:06 AM
2

Exactly.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:58 AM
-2

Soon she'll be a slutwalker.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:36 AM
2

Affirmative action. It hurts men more. It hurts whites more. It hurts Asians more.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:33 AM
-3

Lol, Jerry's kids! Keep promoting that anti-male pedohysteria, you turd.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:32 AM
0

My goal is a functional society. That's more important to me than love. So your argument isn't valid.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:32 AM
-1

American conservatism? Invested? No. I just am NOT invested in American "liberalism" which means I reserve the right to question others' belief systems. The only thing I invest in is the truth.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:28 AM
-2

zaferk answered pretty well. It's possible that widespread homosexuality is a threat to the stability of a culture, sure, because that means a decline in birth rates.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:27 AM
-5

Careful OP, drinkthebleach calls the police on people who even suggest that statutory "rape" laws are ever unjust, lol, so you may have the po-po on the way.
/r/MensRights05/02/12 12:09 AM
1

Well we'd have to examine the effects of widespread homosexuality on the culture to determine that. Perhaps we could look at what happened to Rome.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 11:45 PM
2

Absolutely. Big government welfare state policies subsidize single motherhood and divorce and ensure destruction of the family and children growing up in poverty and without a father figure, resulting in criminality, shorter lifespans, and a high likelihood of repeating the mistakes of their mother.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 11:32 PM
-2

lol get used to it sister
/r/MensRights04/02/12 11:27 PM
3

Affirmative action is never good because it is DISCRIMINATION. And you are a troll.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 11:27 PM
-1

The problem is that "homophobia" isn't a fair term. Nothing in that article indicates the author is "scared" of homosexuals, only that he is against homosexuality. I would admit he is anti-homosexuality, but I won't call him "homophobic" because the term is a very unfair one. "Homophobia" is a scare term used to paint those against homosexuality as being irrationally fearful of it and denying that they may have any rational reasons to oppose homosexuality or to oppose the glorification of homose…
/r/MensRights04/02/12 11:19 PM
-1

Once more, an attempt to inject American conservative politics into the MRM. This was also submitted to the following subreddits: Conservative, alternative_right, rightist, tea_party, and new_right. It also links to whitepridetv.com. Did you forget the other part of your post where you seem to have a problem with the conservative notion of liberty? I'd like to see some liberty injected into the men's rights movement, since that's kind of the whole point. As I've already said, I don't deny that s…
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:49 PM
21

What would have happened if the police showed up and ID'd everyone? You would have been demonized in the media as gang rapists who violently raped a poor innocent girl against her will and you'd be in jail right now.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:45 PM
-2

No, this guy is not forcing his beliefs on school children, he is presenting them on a blog, so he's not infringing on anyone's liberty. I'm not even saying he's not against homosexuality or that he is a fan of liberty. But in this case his stance is in line with the pursuit of liberty.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:32 PM
-1

Standing against people who are pushing their beliefs on others does not make one "homophobic", it makes one a defender of liberty. I don't tell you what's right and you don't tell me what's right. That's liberty.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:28 PM
-1

Why... why must you troll? Sung to the tune of why must I cry. If you take issue with a claim, address it legitimately, free of sarcasm and mischaracterizations. You might get more respect that way. Also make sure to read this so you can avoid future lies about Ron Paul. (Lol, I know you won't, since you're a troll.)
/r/MensRights04/02/12 10:00 PM
-4

Feminism, like all leftism, is inherently immoral.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 09:33 PM
0

No. I do not dumb down my writing to cater to the willingly obtuse.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 09:30 PM
-2

You don't have to read minds to understand the very simple concept that a system of equal rights is no longer a system of equal rights as long as one of the rights in that system is unequal. Therefore a system where, for example, females are protected from genital mutilation and males are not, meaning they have unequal rights to bodily integrity, is not a system of equality, and therefore is not what I was referring to. I was referring to a system where equal rights exist and you were not. I can…
/r/MensRights04/02/12 09:28 PM
0

Most of us are able to parse the English language with context in mind. Apparently you must take every opportunity available to act silly.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 09:20 PM
-2

I doubt you were actually confused unless I underestimated your intelligence.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 09:13 PM
-1

Are you a member of the human race?
/r/MensRights04/02/12 09:13 PM
-3

My personal view is that women do not need any additional legal rights over men. They will of course continue to have fewer responsibilities in balance with their fewer rights. Suffrage is an example of a right that should be granted to more men than women.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 09:12 PM
1

Society.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 09:06 PM
0

Morality is determined by costs and benefits.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 09:04 PM
-3

Straw man, that's not what I said. We were discussing equal rights and universal equality. Total equality is immoral. That - of course - does not imply that particular instances of equal treatment are immoral.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 09:04 PM
-1

Your "invitation for discussion" is insincere. You are just looking for an opportunity to spout the same thing you do in all the other threads. Stick to rational argument, avoid ad hominems. No need to try to start a childish fight yet again, ignatius.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:50 PM
-5

Equal rights is NOT the right thing to do. Equality causes harm to people, a fundamental wrong, and is therefore immoral.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:47 PM
-1

You'd be surprised how long it took me to find rape jokes with a Google search because of all the feminist websites that came up complaining about how bad rape jokes are.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:31 PM
0

I think a good interpretation is that the vast majority of women see men as utility objects from which to extract money and resources. And if you pay attention you'll see this is quite true.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:09 PM
0

I agree.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:09 PM
1

What the fuck are you fuckers talking about lol
/r/MensRights04/02/12 08:45 AM
-2

Indeed. You believe the truth to be what you are told. I believe the truth to be what I see with mine own eyes. One of us is a sheep.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 05:13 AM
0

9 months vs 18 years
/r/MensRights04/02/12 05:12 AM
2

It's the patriarchy's fault!
/r/MensRights04/02/12 05:10 AM
0

I agree, but that isn't the reality.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 03:38 AM
-2

I wonder why people think MRAs are misogynists. Because the truth is considered misogynistic.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 03:09 AM
2

Well at least you admit you're trolling and not actually providing a counter-point to the article in question.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 02:53 AM
5

Before paternity testing, women and male white knights would claim that “women would never lie about paternity.” Since paternity testing has proven this to be a myth, they have moved to “biological/genetic connections don’t matter” and shaming language.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 02:48 AM
0

Says the troll of 12 days. If you've got an argument please present it. Otherwise kindly shush.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 02:44 AM
1

blah blah can't argue rationally just spews bullshit so cool You're boring
/r/MensRights04/02/12 02:29 AM
-5

Up-vote, fellas. It seems the down-vote brigades are in full force tonight! A quote from the article: Simply “not being a feminist” does not make a woman an ally of men. All it means is that instead of using the state to extract money and other resources from men, they believe marriage is the best way of doing this.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 02:28 AM
1

What are you even talking about now? I never made an argument for American exceptionalism. Are you literally retarded? Don't answer.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 02:25 AM
1

I've never read Ayn Rand. Still waiting for a response rather than trollololololing. So far this is all you've said: I'm an ignorant fuck, listen to me.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 02:11 AM
1

Sarcasm as a last resort. Run from the truth, you prissy little bitch, lol.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 01:59 AM
-1

You're either an alt or his butt-buddy, because you both showed up at that thread out of the blue at the same time to troll. No, it does not surprise me that there are a great number of idiots and assholes in this world who are against me and all other sane people because they are selfish and stupid. I've grown used to it.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 01:42 AM
1

Yes, that's why the crisis both originated in the US and hit the US the hardest, because the government was too involved, despite you lot having the least regulated market. Makes perfect sense. Why don't you read about the causes you idiot? The federal government encouraged bad loans because of affirmative action. They CAUSED the fucking problem. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sv96YIFsZfQ&t=7m25s Then they threw almost a trillion dollars of fake money created by the Federal Reserve to prop up th…
/r/MensRights04/02/12 01:41 AM
-2

Ooh yeah, ooh yeah Nothing really matters Anyone can see Nothing really matters Nothing really matters To me Any way the wind blows...
/r/MensRights04/02/12 01:32 AM
0

No, you were giving excuses for your own personal discrimination against males because you are a selfish twat.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 01:31 AM
0

Look, idiot. The divorce rate in 1900 was 5%. Now you're telling me the divorce rate in Canada is around 40% and acting like this is proof that women's suffrage doesn't lead to divorce. Are you retarded? The banks weren't DEregulated, you idiot. The government is to blame for getting too involved and for making the bubble bigger. Socialism stinks.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 01:27 AM
-4

Not everybody, obviously. Go get back on your alt and fuck off, IT.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 01:17 AM
3

Nope, not one bit.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 01:16 AM
0

Yep, and most college women are sluts and conceited bitches. Women who are not sluts and conceited bitches need not be offended because I'm not talking about them. They are rare, of course, but they do exist.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 01:11 AM
-4

Well, yeah, men are the ones who built civilization and all this technology, not women. And women have had plenty of time to prove they're actually equal. Instead, they've open up a big can of mediocrity and they just keep begging for more and more privileges over men to make them seem equals. And why should a demographic that only cares about themselves (women) be allowed the right to vote? Obviously, if you pay attention to the world around you, it didn't work out so well.
/r/MensRights04/02/12 01:10 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter