TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Johnthereader Archive

View 5 posts and 138 comments by Johnthereader on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
13

A good poem. In situations like this though, I prefer The Charge Of The Light Brigade. It really conveys the sense of hopelessness quite well.
/r/MensRights27/04/13 02:52 AM
12

At least they're labeled worst.
/r/MensRights20/04/13 07:31 AM
1

Thank you.
/r/MensRights17/04/13 05:54 PM
3

This doesn't go here. It goes in r/tumblrinaction
/r/MensRights17/04/13 05:52 PM
2

Anyone else notice that a lot of these don't even have anything to do with sexism? I think she took every hate message she ever got, and posted them. I mean, some respond to posts of hers that are from before this incident.
/r/MensRights16/04/13 09:12 PM
1

Mensrants
/r/MensRights04/04/13 11:42 PM
6

With long, unbroken diatribes like that one, my own internal monologue, reading the words, turns into the screeching sounds made by distressed parrots. I have yet to finish one because of this. I usually just respond by blocking the person, and trying to forget they ever existed.
/r/MensRights04/04/13 09:52 AM
3

Mensrants. That's where things like this go.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 08:24 PM
4

This belongs in mensrants.
/r/MensRights03/04/13 08:16 PM
1

This is why I wish I had some decent tools. Frankly fixing things isn't hard, it just requires a bit of research, materials, effort, and good tools. I have a decent hammer, and some wrenches, but no power tools, and very crappy saws. :/
/r/MensRights29/03/13 06:37 AM
5

I cannot stress enough, that this video needs to be shared, and put out there for more people to see, so that people realize that this happens. Share it, tweet it, tumblr it, whatever you have, put it out there. Make people not ignore this. I'm fucking tired of things like this not getting any attention.
/r/MensRights29/03/13 05:47 AM
30

And a damn good thing she's actually been charged. At least there'll be some kind of justice here. Maybe if the police had done their jobs in the first place, and not gone after someone based on the word of a girl, who supposedly didn't know her friends last names, or phone numbers, then this poor kid wouldn't have been traumatized.
/r/MensRights26/03/13 06:35 AM
1

Seems more like a "one of these things is not like the others" kind of argument to me. At least I think that's what she was going for.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 10:50 PM
1

I do not remember, but it was everywhere a while back. I'm sure if you search the thread you'll find it somewhere.
/r/MensRights25/03/13 01:01 AM
0

It implies that no one judges us for our looks, which is also inaccurate. Men now actually hive slightly higher rates of body image problems, yet people claim we are not objectified.
/r/MensRights24/03/13 10:09 PM
4

Every feminist group who lobbied for the VAWA, lobbied for the detention of men, and for making DV look like a gendered crime. I imagine you just didn't know what to look for. Also, links in the sidebar are helpful. As for men not being allowed to be raped, you'll find that most people are simply unwilling to accept that it can happen, even if they seem rational. That's not just feminism, it's a stupid public mindset, which needs changing. I've met enough men who've been sexually assaulted, and …
/r/MensRights22/03/13 06:44 PM
2

Signed. Thank you for posting the link.
/r/MensRights21/03/13 09:16 AM
1

No memes.
/r/MensRights20/03/13 07:17 PM
1

I agree about not getting into the oppression Olympics, because that leads nowhere useful. That's not what I asked though. This poster is misleading. It implies some sort of reproductive rights that men have, and we don't, so I was simply asking if there were any rights I had left for the government to take. It implies that the government is somehow picking on women, when in fact they have more rights than men do.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 03:05 AM
1

I stated my question in the title. What reproductive rights do these women think we have, that could possibly be taken away? I have no argument with women getting abortions, or even not having to ask the father's permission, however, if that is to be the case, and women are to be allowed the right to relinquish responsibility for the pregnancy, by ending it, shouldn't men have a similar right to relinquish said responsibility? Not by ending the pregnancy, but by ending the financial burden cause…
/r/MensRights17/03/13 03:00 AM
0

I was told there was a law in one of the east coast states, but I can't seem to find it. It might have stemmed from the fact that doctors will apparently often require that a wife sign a consent form, because they can be sued later otherwise. Should not have stated it as a fact. Sorry about that.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 01:39 AM
1

They've had laws in places, which made it so you couldn't have one without your wife's permission.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 12:52 AM
3

At least she was embarrassed by his actions. I mean, if she brought them back, she probably wasn't using them, and hero boy was just trying to defend her from problems that didn't exist. I'd be embarrassed too.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 10:44 PM
1

I'm told the real statistic is more like 1 in 1800 or so, at least in the U.S. In places like South Africa, it's a good bit higher, but their crime rates are horrible for everything else too.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 02:07 AM
1

I love how the people over on r/rage are not seeing why someone should be pissed off by this article. Astounding.
/r/MensRights16/03/13 01:54 AM
2

Luckily, I am no longer surprised by the vastness of human stupidity, or that might have given me an aneurism.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 02:48 AM
1

The info says he slammed her head into the ground first, and there is no source other than the title stating that he had brain damage, so I'm calling this self defense, until a credible source proves me wrong.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 08:47 PM
2

Actually in this case, their names were everywhere because their friend playfully tweeted what was happening the whole time, as if it were funny. Pictures were included in said tweets. I believe there was even a video out there somewhere. It was then picked up by a blog, and spread all over the internet. While in most cases, where there is some doubt as to whether a crime occurred, I think names should be kept private, in this case, the names went out literally as the rape occurred. There was no…
/r/MensRights13/03/13 08:39 PM
3

Except they are commonplace. Only 5% can be proven to be false, to the point of being prosecutable, just like about 5% can actually be proven to be true. The vast majority fall into a gray area in between, and certainly some are true, and some are false, but saying that only the 5% they prosecute are actually false, is intellectually dishonest.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 08:19 PM
12

You can't withdraw consent after the fact. That's not how consent works.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 06:26 PM
7

I think he means violent rapes as opposed to most date rapes, but reading the post made me a little ill.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 06:23 PM
5

The accusation is false, the report might not be. The accusation pertains to the specific person. The report pertains to the incident.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 06:08 PM
4

In a few studies they've shown lie detectors to be no better than flipping a coin, in terms of accuracy. EDIT: Had to fix a word.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 06:00 PM
3

So. . . Yay for government offices being so good at their job. /s Is it mandatory that they do that, if you aren't there when she files or something?
/r/MensRights12/03/13 10:25 PM
4

So more than half?
/r/MensRights09/03/13 07:27 PM
21

Actually, there is a men's day. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Men%27s_Day
/r/MensRights09/03/13 01:17 AM
1

That may be true, but the fact is, every problem she brings up doesn't stem from sexism, it comes from just plain bad writing. A lot of female characters don't develop, but neither do most male characters. The only reason any male character develops in a lot of games, is because the game is about them in the first place. We need better damn writing in our games, if they're going to expand as a medium, and luckily, that's exactly what we're seeing. Hopefully, games will advance and the story tell…
/r/MensRights08/03/13 05:42 AM
2

More like destruction of property, or perhaps reckless endangerment if anyone actually gets hurt.
/r/MensRights08/03/13 02:43 AM
3

I was agreeing, but kind of expanding on it with my own thoughts there. It really should be safe for people, but it's not, and that sucks. Hopefully, someday, all humans(regardless of gender, religious views, etc.) will be beyond these kinds of violent behaviors, but until then, we need to be safe.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 08:40 AM
6

Should be, but it isn't. There are wack jobs, freaks, and all around evil people out there, so it's best to take steps to keep yourself safe. There shouldn't be shitty, drunk, drugged up, or overly tired drivers out there, but there are, so I wear a seat belt, and watch like a hawk when I'm driving. If someone hits me, it's likely not my fault, but I'll be much less dead, if I take steps to make myself safer.
/r/MensRights07/03/13 08:14 AM
28

If she stabbed him before, she should already have been in jail. This is disgusting.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 09:12 PM
3

The reason, "teaching men not to rape" will never work, is because, most of us don't need to be fucking taught. Generally speaking, the idea of rape is repugnant to us. The few sickos out there won't be deterred by someone telling them not to do it, but they might be deterred by a bullet.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 07:46 PM
13

Do you have any idea why they interviewed your child? It seems like they'd need some kind of trigger to bother doing that, right? So, who thought she was being molested, and why? That's what I'd want to know.
/r/MensRights06/03/13 05:10 AM
2

Better.
/r/MensRights28/02/13 12:12 AM
1

You need commas. I had to read that a couple times to get what you meant.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 11:54 PM
35

It's just sexism. There's no "reverse." We gotta get rid of it.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 06:25 PM
16

She would be how I found the MRM in the first place. Had really thought I was alone.
/r/MensRights27/02/13 01:37 AM
1

I wish I could point to a specific spot, but if you watch the whole thing it really gives you the idea that they think young, male youtubers, whose primary subscribers are young females, are getting more views, because women are being objectified, and thus, have to produce content with some merit to be successful, while males can just be attractive, and talk about nothing. . . (ironic almost?) . . . The logic is really backwards to me.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 06:03 AM
1

Don't go hating on the video, just would like to know the thought process behind this.
/r/MensRights26/02/13 02:40 AM
1

None of this is in line with men's rights. I feel like I need a shower after reading it. I feel insulted.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 07:06 PM
4

Good. Though the person who took it out of context, and put it in that book was not. I hate when people do that.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 07:27 PM
4

One would hope. This seems like babbling insanity.
/r/MensRights16/02/13 07:16 PM
14

It is wrong to abuse anyone. Women and children are considerably safer in society than men are, with women being even safer than children, whom we devote so much time, effort, and resources to keeping safe. I'm not saying we should do less to keep women safe, but we should do more for men, and denouncing crimes against us is not okay. We are abused as often as women, and if we seek help, we are most often simply turned away. That's wrong.
/r/MensRights14/02/13 06:49 PM
4

I think it means 6 hours more, per week, than women.
/r/MensRights13/02/13 07:14 PM
1

I'd rather see both. That way you get a targeted ad, and a non gender specific one, which will catch more people than either.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 05:47 AM
59

Now put this up all over the place. I want to see it spread.
/r/MensRights12/02/13 01:09 AM
6

Both men and women need to be taught to be discerning. Both men and women need to be taught to be good people. It's not a matter of gender, as much as it's a matter of basic parenting. If you don't teach your children to be good people, and to discern who is really good for them, and who is not, then you've failed.
/r/MensRights11/02/13 06:19 PM
1

And of course, you can't say anything about it, or argue with anyone, because then you're suddenly the asshole for pointing out sexism in a post, or a meme. I don't normally whine about this kind of thing, but I'm really getting tired of the image of men as the abuser, the attacker, the monster. I'm none of those things, and I shouldn't have to worry about people thinking I am, nor should it be a joke.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 10:21 AM
2

I'm baffled.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 02:23 AM
2

It was a trap by 4Chan, to get feminists to show their true colors. It seems to have worked like a charm.
/r/MensRights10/02/13 02:20 AM
6

Let's see. . . I've seen shirts mocking my religion, gender, sexuality, race, the list goes on. Guess how much I care? That would be, not at all. I think anyone wearing those shirts was probably a douche-bag, but I'll just roll my eyes, and avoid them in the future. It's not violent, harmful, or even really that offensive.
/r/MensRights08/02/13 02:53 AM
1

Indeed. I need stats, before making a definite judgement, but I like to assume people aren't horrible liars, until it's proven otherwise. I'm often disappointed, but still.
/r/MensRights07/02/13 08:37 PM
4

He seems to be saying that most, if not all of them are lairs. This is not the case.
/r/MensRights06/02/13 07:46 PM
1

Well, no. Very few men (still way too many) are actually convicted by the courts. It's the conviction that society gives you, for even being accused that's the problem for so very many men. Even being accused gives you this stigma that's really hard to escape, and can wreck your whole world. I think in those cases, where we know a man is innocent, the accuser should always be punished, especially if the man has served time. I really hope the OP doesn't have to go to court about this at all, and …
/r/MensRights05/02/13 07:35 PM
1

Then they can sometimes detect the presence of the lubricant, or the latex powder from the outside of the condom. Regardless, it would be in his favor to have it done.
/r/MensRights05/02/13 05:11 AM
1

Bipolar is way more complicated than that for one, and for two, Ms. Piggy has violent, and often somewhat random mood swings. Going from highs, with excitement, to lows, of crying, or bouts of insane anger. They often have nothing to do with ego. . . . I can't believe I'm debating the psychological state of a Muppet. I love Reddit.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 05:47 AM
1

Those are also signs of bipolar disorder, though it can be hard to tell. She'd need a more detailed examination. It would make a good article on Cracked.
/r/MensRights03/02/13 01:29 AM
3

I'm straight, and always have been, and I was still bullied for being gay. It was a witch hunt man. Tell one kid you wanted to know how to make wine, and everyone is trying to fix you up with their gay friend. O.o
/r/MensRights01/02/13 07:01 PM
8

She is kinda physically abusive. I'd say she shows strong signs of bipolar disorder.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 06:45 PM
8

Except most people don't say no, because they think sex is wrong, but because they don't feel ready to do it. Whether in the context of a single relationship, or the broader context of life in general, sex is a big deal. It has a lot of emotions attached to it, and some people are simply not ready when they are asked the first time. I wasn't, which didn't stop the girl I was saying no to, but regardless, knowing how to say "no" is a good thing.
/r/MensRights01/02/13 08:35 AM
20

This woman is a sexual predator. She abused her power in order to force someone to sleep with her. This is disgusting. If the officer who had committed suicide were female, there would likely have been a criminal case. While both were foolish to begin the tryst in the first place, the man should have been allowed to back out when he didn't want it anymore. Isn't that what feminists are always saying women should be allowed to do? I hope that any woman who reads this, including feminists, would s…
/r/MensRights31/01/13 06:44 PM
18

They are bugs. It is clearly a joke. Don't worry about it.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 06:35 PM
2

Actually a lot of women will acknowledge that this happens, they just tend to say it's worse for them. . . somehow. I find it irritating sometimes, but to be honest, when women talk about me being attractive, it doesn't bother me. (not that it happen too terribly often) I guess it's a matter of personal taste.
/r/MensRights30/01/13 06:21 AM
1

Well, we have to confirm, before we decide what to do. I think both are overpriced and crummy anyway though. Just an opinion.
/r/MensRights29/01/13 12:24 AM
2

Yes. Literally, exactly, this, right here. These words. I shit you not. I'd have to do some serious digging to find it at this point, but it made my brain itch when I read it.
/r/MensRights28/01/13 01:48 AM
32

"Don't objectify me!" . . . three seconds later, "OMG Taylor Lautner's abs!" Guess how many times I've seen exactly this?
/r/MensRights27/01/13 08:37 PM
1

Legal definitions usually contain some Latin, but I'm assuming it's something pretty close to that. Kind of annoying, that we get punished for it, and women don't. Also the exact opposite of the whole, slut shaming argument that feminists like to use. Men get mocked or in this case arrested for it. It's rarely a celebrated trait in any human being, except among dumb, drunken college kids of both genders.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 08:33 PM
2

Well, at least some people are getting it, that we're not all shaved apes. (some are, I'm not gonna lie) But it'll be a fight to actually get people to realize that not every male is some sort of animal. It's become a bit engrained into society, that women are some sort of pure angelic creatures, and men merely the corrupting influence, akin to some kind of drug.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 08:21 PM
3

True enough, but what legally constitutes seduction, in this case? I have to wonder. Is it just getting someone to sleep with you, or does alcohol need to be involved, or. . . ? I'm kind of curious now.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 06:45 PM
11

I think that's a very old law. I'm not sure. A lot of places used to have laws like that though. You see, people thought that men were roaming beasts, who would sleep with everything, if there were no law against it, and well, that would ruin things for the men who waited for marriage, and blah blah blah.
/r/MensRights27/01/13 05:59 PM
1

I remember Girl Writes What, debunked it in a video of hers, (Though that might have been a specific year) but I can't seem to remember which one. I'm a bit flustered at the moment. Regardless, I don't like the idea of self report on something like this. An overwhelming majority of men will not report being sexually assaulted, or raped, because we are told we cannot be, or that we should like it, and "feel lucky." There are even cases where it is legally impossible to rape a man, even if he's un…
/r/MensRights23/01/13 11:54 PM
2

Thank you. This is helpful.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 11:48 PM
4

Except that is a horribly biased, self report survey, which has been proven unreliable on many occasions. I don't trust a self report survey. Especially one wherein, questions use the words "when you didn't want to" instead of "when you didn't give consent."
/r/MensRights23/01/13 11:43 PM
2

If they believe the person is being sincere.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 06:27 PM
9

Indeed, but the punishment must be served as well. Otherwise, there is no point.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 07:24 AM
33

The fact that she feels no remorse, is what bothers me. She didn't even apologize for trying to kill someone over a relationship ending. That's insane. The fifteen years is about average for a crime like this, but hopefully she'll actually serve all of it. I don't think, that someone willing to kill over something that petty, deserves their freedom, early.
/r/MensRights23/01/13 02:12 AM
1

And once those artificial, enhanced, genomes are used to make babies, and those babies are grown, those people will get all the bids.
/r/MensRights17/01/13 02:26 AM
1

Except most Greeks, and Romans never went to any kind of school. Only nobles, and even then in most cases only males. Males of noble families, were the ones involved in politics, philosophy, and warfare, so they were the ones who needed schooling. Farmers were usually farmers their whole lives, unless they got conscripted in a time of war. Though I think Rome at one point had a law where you could only own land if you'd served in the military? Not sure on that. Regardless, in the farming familie…
/r/MensRights15/01/13 07:53 PM
5

Actually, 2000 years ago in subsistence cultures, both parents took part in raising children, just like about everything else. It was what was done, because it needed to be. When the children were old enough to help with the work, they did, because it was needed. They didn't need to be raised as much, because they had constant work to do. 50 years ago though, yeah. Women usually stayed home with the children, and men went to work. Most people didn't have a problem with it either.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 07:00 PM
14

That's all of the media dude. Fox is just louder.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 06:40 PM
2

Well, if he'd done that, he would have gotten an answer he didn't like. It would be harder to demonize us. That's what this one is after, as you well know. Feel free to rip his idiocy apart again. :) It was funny last time.
/r/MensRights15/01/13 06:39 PM
2

Want some aloe for that burn?
/r/MensRights14/01/13 10:18 PM
127

I have tried to talk to feminists, and I'll continue to do so. However, if they dare to dismiss the fact that I was at best sexually assaulted, and at worst raped, by a girl in high school, I stop talking. At that point, I'm done, because there's no talking to someone who thinks so little of you as to say that you deserved it, because of something someone did hundreds of years ago, which you had nothing to do with. They are shit heads, and not worth the thought in my argumentation.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 07:14 AM
3

I've had a lot of great teachers. I've had a lot of horrible teachers. I had respect for the good ones. Of my three favorite teachers, two were male. Both of them were science teachers. The female teacher I really liked, taught English/literature, and was awesome. Even if I'd been driven mad, I'd have paused for any of them. I'm very glad that this teacher was there. He probably saved a great many lives. He deserves a medal, and possibly a statue.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 01:19 AM
5

Have a look around this sub reddit, and you'll find evidence against that statement.
/r/MensRights13/01/13 01:15 AM
2

That's exactly what I was addressing. I know what would have happened, and I'm saying that it's bullshit that that is the case.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 06:54 PM
18

It was not better. Someone should have put her in jail the first time she committed an act like this against her husband, or son. I'm well aware of the slant in family court that might have allowed her full custody of her son if there had been a divorce. That is exactly what I was talking about in the second part of my comment. They were her prisoners. They couldn't leave, because the law was not on their side, and it was a horrid situation, that should never have existed.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 10:49 AM
1

What the actual fuck? I have no words. Shouldn't it be a crime to. . . Negligence. Criminal Negligence. Doesn't this count? Shouldn't this count? Because of this person, rapists are walking free, and there is at least a possibility of innocent men being in jail for a horrible crime. I'd think that kind of screw up bears more than a firing. If you were a cop, or a prison guard and you somehow managed to let several rapists go free, and maybe imprison innocent people for the crime, I'd think they …
/r/MensRights12/01/13 03:55 AM
79

When I was in grade school, I went to a daycare after school. One of the kids who went to said daycare was named Matt. His mother was horribly abusive to his father, and to him. At one point she even threw Matt's father down a flight of stairs, which put him in the hospital. No one ever called the police, or asked for help. Matt had severe mental issues, which likely may have been caused by such a horrible home environment. Part of the reason men in these situations do not tell anyone is because…
/r/MensRights12/01/13 02:57 AM
1

If that's the case, then I hope things change here too.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 06:19 PM
25

Both are uncontrollable biological responses to physical stimuli. A person's feelings about said stimuli do not matter in the least.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 05:23 AM
118

This is exactly why most men don't say a word if they get raped. It's common belief that it can't happen to us. We are the sex monsters, and only we can hurt someone this way.
/r/MensRights11/01/13 04:18 AM
2

Well, since it's an actual argument often used by those trying to make a case for how male and female sexuality are viewed in America and much of the western world, I'd say it isn't that forced.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 09:54 PM
2

WARNING: incoming intense sarcasm. Oh but guys! Sex for women is beautiful and good, and sex for men is dirty and bad and wrong! Didn't you know that? Men are not allowed to appreciate the beauty of women, because we are evil and sex crazed. Women aren't, so when they go nuts over Tom Daily, Tailor Lautner, etc. It's just an expression of their beautiful sexuality.
/r/MensRights10/01/13 07:14 PM
1

Can we get this circulating on facebook among other places?
/r/MensRights09/01/13 10:11 PM
4

Indeed. There is nothing wrong with a woman being called beautiful. It is not an insult to them, nor to other women. No one is calling them ugly, by calling this woman beautiful. The jealousy inherent in thinking so is pathetic.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 09:19 PM
2

I'd say the reason men tend to be good at parenting may be our ability to not over-think everything. We do what needs to be done, we take care of the kids, and we don't try to take every piece of "advice" in parenting magazines. We also helicopter a lot less, while usually managing to know what our kids are up to. This isn't all cases mind you, but it is what I've seen. Take it as anecdotal.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 07:51 PM
11

Commenting that someone is beautiful. . . is now. . . "extraordinarily inappropriate." Crazier, and crazier, and crazier. You'd think that when something like half of girls end up with terrible body image, complements would be appreciated. Most guys I know, especially those with bad body image, love getting complements. It makes them feel better about themselves. We don't usually complain when someone else receives a complement either, though I'll admit to the competitive part of my brain lighti…
/r/MensRights09/01/13 06:39 PM
1

I understand exactly what it is. I just don't think it belongs in real cinema. It's a complete load of crap.
/r/MensRights09/01/13 03:51 AM
32

The fact that their monopoly over the mindset of western culture is dying is a good thing. I'm glad people are waking up. A lot of the comments give me some hope.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 07:13 PM
1

What about when everybody in a base does it when I fail to get them with a grenade?
/r/MensRights08/01/13 07:04 PM
1

Think being teabagged counts? If so, it happened to me about forty times yesterday. That guy was way too good with a DMR.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 06:43 PM
3

This is total trash, and I don't see it being a big hit. Hopefully it will be a terrible flop, and the studio will realize that putting out hateful crap isn't a good idea. It shouldn't have been considered in the first place. I expect this on Lifetime, but in a real cinema?
/r/MensRights08/01/13 08:23 AM
-2

I've met plenty who simply do not care, and if a guy complains about it, he's "a jerk" or "not worth her time" or in the worst case "a rape supporter." I should have said radfem as opposed to implying it applied to all feminists.
/r/MensRights08/01/13 02:09 AM
-3

Because in women it has no medical benefits whatsoever, and actually entails removal of the clitoris, which is the rough biological equivalent to cutting off the head of your penis. It doesn't make sex impossible, but it makes it lack any sort of pleasure. (Though of course to a feminist, men shouldn't care about getting any pleasure out of sex, and it should be all about intimacy. Which I find to be complete bullshit.)
/r/MensRights08/01/13 01:36 AM
-4

I have to agree. I'd say lower risks for cancer, and STIs is a good thing. 60% less likely to contract HIV from someone. That seems like a good thing. As to whether the child should be allowed to choose for themselves. How many children would eat a healthy diet, brush their teeth, go outside and exercise, do their homework, or any number of other things that are actually good for them, without their parents mandating it. How many would never, ever, go to the dentist. While it may not be necessar…
/r/MensRights07/01/13 10:20 PM
13

A visiting Canadian perhaps?
/r/MensRights07/01/13 01:20 AM
1

Less of a "big if" than you might think, but still, real proof would be required. Men are often used as weapons by women. They just don't kill as often as they could.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 06:30 PM
2

If it is what she intended to happen, she should be charged as if she had hired a hit man.
/r/MensRights06/01/13 09:35 AM
1

Explain how it's arrogant to say that in some families the mom really does make Christmas. (This ad implies that it is talking about the specific family portrayed within it, when that quote pops up) Especially ones where the father must work all hours, as societies often dictate men do. The shopping, decorating, and cooking often fall to the mother. Mothers like that are who this ad is for. They might be rare these days, but they exist. Now while I agree it might be arrogant for some mothers to …
/r/MensRights31/12/12 07:47 AM
1

This is an ad for a corporation which wants women to shop. It targets mothers because they tend to blow a lot of money on Christmas. There is nothing sexist about it. I understand why someone might see it, if they were looking for it specifically, but you can do that with almost anything.
/r/MensRights31/12/12 03:01 AM
2

I really can't get mad at this ad. It's targeted at moms. It's basic marketing. I don't get pissed about adds targeted at men. "Dads who get it, get GoGurt." Not offensive.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 07:24 PM
2

Some do. I know a few at least, who see this as unbalanced and idiotic. I know at least one, who thinks that the right to vote should have included a draft for women. (Though she admits men tend to be better soldiers, just because of the physicality required to be one.)
/r/MensRights30/12/12 09:31 AM
5

Again, not all women think that way. Not all women want complete unaccountability. You know who likes to put an entire gender in one little box, based on the worst element thereof? Radfems. You sound like them.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 12:38 AM
3

Not every woman is like that, and saying that all of them are, is incredibly counterproductive. When you talk like that, you sound just like the more extreme feminists.
/r/MensRights30/12/12 12:24 AM
3

I really hope no one is insane enough to believe this. It seems to imply that a woman deserves one man to be her social, and monetary support, while not necessarily offering anything to him in return, and another man to give her children the "good genes" that she wants. Whereas, if a man wanted multiple mates, he would be considered a cheater, a dog, or a player. Take your pick. I'm all for people having multiple partners, if they want to. That's their prerogative. No one should treat them badly…
/r/MensRights30/12/12 12:01 AM
9

I like to put hats on mine. :)
/r/MensRights26/12/12 03:47 AM
1

Well hopefully she'll be mocked on the internet as much as Chris Brown was. Anyone who does this is an asshole. That's not mentioning the fact that the guy was trying to be a model, and didn't look half bad. Now that's probably out of the question.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 10:43 PM
67

No one who commits an assault like this should be let off so easily, regardless of gender. :/ This disgusts me.
/r/MensRights25/12/12 05:00 AM
0

This kid was thirteen. That might be old enough for High school if he was jumped ahead a grade, but I don't think that's the case. Maybe I'll google it. The so called sports they always have for girls are somewhat pathetic in my opinion. Golf, bowling, etc. I would find it patronizing if I were a girl. These are games, not sports. As for private games, most leagues are private. They are sponsored by local companies for the most part, at least from what I've seen.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:48 AM
-1

Why exactly would they have to eliminate a sport? Also, what is a "male sport," dick fencing? I'm pretty sure girls can and do play most sports guys do. They even have football leagues, they just get fewer players.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 07:26 AM
9

Except if a bunch of boys wanted to play they wouldn't need to play on girl's teams. They could simply form their own teams, and have a male league. This is one kid. One, rather scrawny kid at that. At his age, I'd have had about a foot height advantage on the other kids and maybe forty pounds on them. That would be a real disparity, and advantage.
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:09 AM
5

And is quite useful in nature. It produces nutrients in soil, and even kills harmful bacteria.
/r/MensRights14/12/12 08:12 AM
4

The ones I'm talking about are the ones who believe they are feminists based on the definition, and original intent of the movement, before it very quickly went nuts. Like my mother, who was a feminist in the sixties, and is now completely disgusted by the whole movement. I read her a few quotes from feminist leaders, and her jaw hit the floor.
/r/MensRights11/12/12 03:17 AM
3

I've met a few feminists who actually give a crap about male victims (mostly because they know me, and what happened to me) but the vast majority don't seem to. At least the ones I've met.
/r/MensRights10/12/12 10:09 PM
1

I feel like reporting them, but I'm not sure what for. What would facebook actually take them down for? A lot of the pages they have up on their list are legitimately repugnant to be honest. I just disagree with the men's rights ones being in there.
/r/MensRights09/12/12 08:16 AM
8

I love this so very much. I've been looking for the right thing to say when that gets posted on my wall every three days. Thank you.
/r/MensRights08/12/12 08:24 AM
5

I don't really think it matters if the guy liked it or not. Wasn't he under the age of consent at the time? Doesn't that make it a crime regardless of whether he liked it or not? That aside though, I'd say that society in general tells boys even at a young age that they're supposed to like touching and looking at breasts, (the stereotype shows up in sitcoms, comic books, all sorts of jokes, and is commonly played upon in episodes of The Simpsons, and Family Guy among others)and if they don't, sa…
/r/MensRights08/12/12 07:56 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter