TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JonSnowsGhost Archive

View 2 posts and 284 comments by JonSnowsGhost on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
12

It was stupid
/r/MensRights30/06/25 08:09 PM
16

O'd just leave the Country at this point The men aren't allowed to leave
/r/MensRights30/06/25 08:08 PM
5

Are you actually... complaining about people shipping characters? Yeah, this sub is definitely not the place to be fucking whining about that, my guy.
/r/MensRights08/02/25 08:01 PM
16

disgusted with those women who spurn their greatest gift and power out of selfishness or misplaced pride Big yikes there, bro
/r/MensRights02/12/24 06:38 PM
34

I don't know - is there something wrong with my logic? There is nothing wrong with your logic; the issue is, unfortunately, that logic is rarely a useful tool against people who've been conditioned to believe and act a certain way. Compounding on your correct logic, it took approximately 100 years from the founding of the country to grant suffrage to all men (the 15th amendment in 1870, though most black men were barred from voting due to barriers like racially motivate literacy tests). From the…
/r/MensRights07/11/24 05:07 PM
6

I sort of get the point you're trying to make, but both of the theoretical policies you mentioned are fairly far removed from actual legislation regarding reproductive issues. the banning of getting a vasectomy The closest female equivalent of a vasectomy would either be a hysterectomy or a tubal ligation, both of which are more invasive and less reversible than a vasectomy. Regardless, afaik, no states are planning on banning any of those surgeries. making masturbation a crime for the killing o…
/r/MensRights06/11/24 06:59 PM
3

What's the alternative? Forcing women into conscription just so they can go overseas and drop like flies or submit to the enemy? Military service is not 100% frontline soldier duty. Yes, men overall make better soldiers, physically, but that doesn't mean that there aren't hundreds of different military jobs that can be easily done by women. Women can be doctors, nurses, drone pilots, electricians, supply workers, accountants, etc. Or should we just encourage men to stay away from military servic…
/r/MensRights06/11/24 02:45 PM
8

Why did she have to make it about men vs women Because either a. she honestly believes that men live vastly better lives than women b. she's pandering to new-wave feminists who unironically believe that c. all of the above
/r/MensRights08/10/24 12:56 PM
2

but they just say that I am not validating their feelings, while they say things that I find upsetting Hopefully your relationship with your cousin is such that you can express similar thoughts/feelings to them and have some understanding be reciprocated. Something like "when people say that they would prefer to run into a bear instead of a man, it makes me feel demonized, that people are assuming I am worse than a wild animal." The minute amount of "success" I've ever had when trying to show th…
/r/MensRights12/06/24 07:35 PM
-3

What is the purpose of this post? A guy went for help because of (rightful) concerns over his wife's behavior and people are saying she's showing clear signs of PPD and that she needs professional treatment. No one in the comments said "you're a man, so you have no idea what she's been through, and you shouldn't tell her how to be a mother." He didn't go on there to talk about his own PPD issues and was laughed at/ridiculed. PPD is a very real thing and it seems like YOU are trying to erase it a…
/r/MensRights06/06/24 04:27 PM
34

I've replied to people with "how would you feel if the question was 'would you rather be alone in the woods with a bear or a black person'" and every time, they say something like "you don't understand the point, those aren't equivalent." When confronted with the bias inherent in the question (comparing men to wild animals) but changing it to a demographic they aren't comfortable with demonizing, they immediately dodge the question and place the blame on you. It's rage-bait, pure and simple, tha…
/r/MensRights07/05/24 07:04 PM
12

I think we shouldnt force a draft on weak women. Like I said, you're an idiot. Physical strength has little to do with usefulness to a country or to its military. There are thousands of jobs to be done, military and civilian wise, that do not require physical strength, but are still necessary. I've had to explain it to you multiple times because you can't seem to understand a very basic point. Drafting only men because of their overall better physical capabilities shows a complete lack of unders…
/r/MensRights10/03/24 04:24 PM
15

And who the fucks gunna stay back and run the country like ww2 Oh, so you think the women should be forced to stay behind, like the men, so they could work in factories and run the country? Send ur sister to be a barracks bunny then if that how u feel Damn, you really are a fucking idiot, huh?
/r/MensRights10/03/24 03:33 PM
28

This is the kind of comment I'd expect from someone who has no idea about the logistics of a military. Frontline soldiers are ONE single job in the military. There are doctors, nurses, IT techs, electricians, mechanics, dentists, logistics/supply workers, admin workers, etc. ALL of those jobs can be done by women just as competently as they are done by men
/r/MensRights10/03/24 02:36 PM
1

Damn dude, you've got some fucking problems
/r/MensRights22/07/23 07:42 PM
13

[ Removed by Reddit ]
/r/MensRights24/04/23 06:14 AM
9

these reachy posts are part of why this sub gets a bad name Absolutely. A lot of posts on this sub are thinly veiled women bashing or just whining about inconsequential things. I'm all for bringing up how male and female perpetrators of violent crimes are treated differently, but an entire fucking post whinging that the article using "gunman" severely degrades any real credibility of the subreddit. Do people actually want it changed to "gunperson," lmao
/r/MensRights27/03/23 10:42 PM
7

If he actually ships them to war, will the government pay for their estrogen during wartime? I know you're partially speaking out of hyperbole, but not everyone job in the military is a front-line grunt. There are plenty of non-combat roles in every branch that would support someone who needs certain medications. Also, yes, the government absolutely would pay for it.
/r/MensRights10/10/22 11:47 PM
-15

Posts need to be about men's rights The top post of this subreddit is someone complaining about getting banned from r/ feminism There's this post about a fan being nice to Johnny Depp, which is nice to see, but doesn't really have anything directly to do with men's rights. It has 10k upvotes There's also this post about Rick Moranis passing away. Great dude, nothing to do with men's rights. 8.5k upvotes There are a lot of posts here that are not about men's rights.
/r/MensRights17/09/22 07:49 PM
1

This had better a fucking joke, wtf
/r/MensRights09/09/22 02:13 AM
2

Curious why none of his advice is "find a video game you enjoy" or "go fishing" Because that won't improve the things OP is complaining about. That's the same shit as tumblr "life advice," like "if you're having a bad day, read a book you like." That's just shit you do to put off actually getting your life together. If you want to be a solitary person, then that's totally fine. But if you want to complain about feeling that no one appreciates you and cares about you, but then also just want to s…
/r/MensRights09/09/22 02:11 AM
2

it seems dangerous to invite others into my life, and by others I strictly mean other guys. I avoid women as they avoid me and legally it's too risky. Bro, cut the crap. "It's dangerous to invite other guys into my life." Like, what the fuck does that mean? Are you saying that you are dangerous to other men or that men are a danger to you? "Legally it's too risky to have women in my life." Yeah, this is also kinda bullshit. Dudes on here act like the majority of women are out there waiting for y…
/r/MensRights09/09/22 02:03 AM
1

I'm sorry to hear that you are in such a terrible situation, but that is your situation. That is a "lesson" that you have learned, but it is in now way applicable to all men. Just because your parents were shitty and don't care for you doesn't mean that's true for everyone else. Same for having friends, a healthy sex-life, or a good support structure. Yes, life sucks for you, but jfc that doesn't mean that all men are treated like shit, with no one to care for them.
/r/MensRights09/09/22 01:58 AM
-8

femes are crazy, smack some sense into them Do you actually think that this is on the same level as the shirt in the post?
/r/MensRights08/08/22 12:42 AM
14

It was better when either it wasn't the main focus or the women were strong in ways that were different from the men. Ellen Ripley and Sarah Connor (T1, T2 of course) are two easy examples of bad-asses who happen to be women. Even for a more modern example, there's Furiosa from Mad Max: Fury Road. Mulan from the original was shown to be strong not for the sole reason of her being a woman, but because she used her femininity as a reason to buck various traditions.
/r/MensRights19/07/22 11:25 AM
1

If you consider it being weak and sad you'd rather work on your homophobia. C'mon man, I disagree with anyone who calls men ugly on principle, but not everything is homophobia.
/r/MensRights09/07/22 07:22 PM
2

What possible benefit is there in saying "well ok these people and those, can just ignore facial hair regs forever. But not the rest of you." So that they can still fill those roles? If the military said "no one is exempt from shaving or hair regulations, except for medical reasons" that would stop a large number of people from joining the military. The concession to allow people to shave or grow out their hair for religious reasons is a small one, compared to expecting people to completely fore…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 09:45 PM
8

Well yeah, that kinda makes sense with the military. It's kinda like you didn't even read my comment. "... will never have to wear a gas mask in the line of duty, but have to shave anyway." I can assure you that the vast majority of military bases do not have a huge supply of gas masks/respirators on hand for every person to readily use. Military vessels do, as do shore based security personnel, but random JAG officers or cooks aren't walking around with masks ready to go. I also pointed out ent…
/r/MensRights06/07/22 08:03 PM
22

This rule exists in militaries for the same reason. Your (gas) mask needs to have a proper seal to function. Except that the no beards rule applies to the entire military (at least the US), regardless of job. Lawyers, doctors, mechanics, etc. will never have to wear a gas mask in the line of duty, but have to shave anyway. Other militaries, like the British and Australian allow beards. It's more for appearance than anything else.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 07:50 PM
8

And Sikhs everyone get an exception to that at least in the US military. So do all submariners while on deployment.
/r/MensRights06/07/22 07:48 PM
3

fuck off
/r/MensRights06/07/22 01:08 AM
-6

This sub is not a bastion of free speech; it is a bastion of opinions you happen to agree with. Maybe this sub doesn't ban people like others do, but dissenting opinions are still usually met with vitriol and downvotes
/r/MensRights09/12/21 04:17 AM
0

Those are toilets. Where, though? Behind the doors? If that's the case, then what's the problem?
/r/MensRights16/11/21 08:46 AM
1

those are sit down toilets Are you complaining that sit down toilets have doors whereas urinals don't?
/r/MensRights16/11/21 08:45 AM
0

No, I don't think practicing self-love is valuable. Maybe it is for women, I'm not a woman, I wouldn't know. I do my best to practice honesty, judgement, and humility. Those are things that must be practiced in order to learn them. Why would self love be important for women and not for men? I was kinda with you up until this, but this just seems like a backhanded insult at women in general.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 04:14 PM
15

Every graphic? Bit of a stretch. Potentially debatable, but I'm willing to agree that anything with a majority of pink is "tailored towards women." However, there are some more neutral ones, like the clock with the yellow background, the person holding the flower, the silhouette of the heart tree (actually looks like a guy leaning against it), the colored "more self love" words, the rainbow, and the Rupi Karr self love quote.
/r/MensRights04/11/21 04:12 PM
0

6 billion could make a huge impact No, it absolutely can't. 6 billion is basically nothing on any sort of international scale.
/r/MensRights03/11/21 01:11 AM
1

Seems like total BS. In all realness, this sub is only useful for finding links to statistics/studies or men's support services. Other than that, it's just a mildly-toxic echo chamber that's less intolerant than most other subreddits.
/r/MensRights20/10/21 07:22 PM
1

Yeah, this reads as basically a weirdo, MRA-but not really MRA version of "and then everyone on the train clapped." Only guy in a class full of feminists, but all of them support him and also hate his feminist teacher. He calls out his teacher in a very condescending fashion (I used to be a feminist like you, until I grew up, lel), but apparently they're friendly with him. Also, the teacher flirts with him regularly, so he's totally safe because he's recorded all of their online conversations/le…
/r/MensRights20/10/21 07:20 PM
21

It gets the people going. It's provocative.
/r/MensRights13/10/21 10:17 AM
7

Can't self-victimize without blaming other people for literally every aspect of your life.
/r/MensRights04/09/21 05:10 AM
3

Okay, buddy
/r/MensRights27/08/21 06:29 AM
3

I think the Army tried to make it gender neutral back in 2017-2018 or so, and a lot of women kept failing the test. I think they adjusted the standards for the test and then eventually went back to different standards for men/women, but I'm not 100% sure on the details.
/r/MensRights23/07/21 08:49 PM
121

I doubt it. Easier fitness tests would lead to more women being drafted against their will Women already have easier fitness tests in the US military.
/r/MensRights23/07/21 11:08 AM
5

if she's ugly, you'd think nobody would want to touch her. Rape is not just for sexual gratification, though. Ugly people get raped and hot people rape people.
/r/MensRights13/06/21 05:24 PM
25

Going overseas is not the only way to serve your country. Before people lose their fucking minds, working in a factory is obviously not the same as dying in a jungle, but it is still a way to support the war effort.
/r/MensRights04/06/21 10:25 AM
2

This is one thing that I loved about serving on a submarine. Guys get kinda flirty with each other after a while and even if it's all for laughs, having someone compliment you still feels good.
/r/MensRights15/05/21 03:27 AM
1

they can have a "religious" reasons to opt out So can men, though, and a lot of them do it too.
/r/MensRights28/04/21 07:39 PM
8

MWM?
/r/MensRights23/04/21 06:08 PM
3

I’m saying she’s being punished more than you might think and you can take some joy in that. I totally agree and I was trying to stress in my comment how much of a punishment probation really is. A lot of people see it and think that it's nothing more than a slap on the wrist when it usually leads to much harsher punishments for later offences or just minor inconveniences that cause you to violate the terms of the probation.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 07:25 AM
8

The system actually did punish her. No, the jail time isn't equivalent and nothing will give that guy his regular life back, but she also served jail time and 5 years probation at a young age is nothing to sneeze at. She basically has to be utterly perfect under the law for that time or she gets messed up.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 03:49 AM
-1

It isn't justice. It's also 7 years old, dude and she got hit with a month in jail, 6 months of monitoring, and 5 years of probation. No, it doesn't give the guy his life or his time back, but are you actually complaining about a case where a false rape accuser got punished for their actions? That's something we should be happy about, especially when it was close to a decade ago.
/r/MensRights23/04/21 03:46 AM
6

Yet she blames "society" lmao It's mind boggling how many women fail to realize that "unfair female beauty standards" are created and spread by other women. Most dudes don't give a fuck about what hair cut a woman has or what color her nails are (I only know like three shades of red, most of that is wasted on me), but somehow it's still our fault.
/r/MensRights20/04/21 12:08 AM
1

We are complaining about double standards regarding male sexuality... I think the issue people (myself included) find with posts about this is that we're complaining about a double standard in a male-dominated subreddit. Is the goal of the men's rights movement to completely eliminate that behavior in every corner of the internet? I think this movement has made good headway when it comes to large socio-political issues in mainstream media, custody rights, male victims of violence/suicide, etc., …
/r/MensRights17/04/21 04:01 AM
1

Neither of those things, but okay. Can you honestly say that this post actively contributes anything to the men's rights cause?
/r/MensRights07/04/21 06:47 PM
3

Did they move the reddit servers into the Grand Canyon because there are a fuck ton of echoes here.
/r/MensRights07/04/21 12:27 AM
7

Lord of the Flies was not about toxic masculinity. It's also not a fucking history book or a scientific study. It's fiction, for fuck's sake.
/r/MensRights05/04/21 09:02 PM
1

Just because something is normalised it doesn't mean you need to accept it or think it's a good thing. This is a fair point and it also does not justify the comparison to murder, imo. They are getting paid to give sexual services to other men and sexual pictures. Okay, so my question for you is: would you be okay with your wife/SO posting bikini pictures to instagram/facebook? If yes, why not just have them post the exact same pictures to OF and get paid for it? From what I've read/seen in inter…
/r/MensRights04/04/21 12:53 PM
2

Well, your username certainly fits. "Hey women who are on this sub and trying to support men and men's rights: fuck you. Fuck you for not overthrowing decades of feminist teachings, likely alienating you from friends and family. Fuck you for not having a wider base of people listening to you than vocal misandrists. Fuck you for caring but not having more power than women who hate men, because that's something you obviously have full control over." Way to try and drive women away, dude.
/r/MensRights31/03/21 09:23 PM
1

and killing people in name of a god is normalized in some places too. Hilarious false equivalence, mate. Are you really trying to equate murder with modern day internet-playboy? Mybe you just roll with hoes, because most women I've met aren't like that Maybe they just don't send nude pics to you. But hey, I'm antisocial I don't know you, but from this comment it sounds less like you're antisocial and more upset that a lot of women are making more money than you (and me and most other people) by …
/r/MensRights31/03/21 01:25 AM
1

I think it’s here because the man is getting a lot of shit for leaving her Tbh, I think he deserves it. Posting scantily clad pictures on social media is highly normalized nowadays, so she might as well get paid for it on OF. Like, if that's a divorce worthy deal-breaker for him, I think he's going to run into a lot of relationship problems.
/r/MensRights30/03/21 09:14 PM
2

Yeah, this is the kind of drivel that really bothers me about this sub. There's so much great stuff here like studies and statistics, various resources, legal advice, etc., but then shit like this pops up with a bunch of upvotes that's just some people complaining about nothing consequential. Presents a bad image, imo.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 11:40 PM
2

Why is this here? What rights are in danger or being violated? What cause does this help further? None of us should care if a man divorces his wife because he doesn't like her job because it has jack-fucking-shit to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights29/03/21 08:34 PM
2

Anyone has even any idea what she could have meant? Did you try asking her? None of us can read her mind, so kinda pointless to ask, tbh. I've seen people try to argue that mandatory service for men is sexist against women because of military benefits and they way that military people are "treated like heroes." Yes, she was an idiot, and no, telling her that women can also join the military did not change her mind. Also, idk if you're talking about the US military, but gay men absolutely can joi…
/r/MensRights28/03/21 06:29 PM
4

I think, by the definition of sexism, no it's not, but nowadays "isms" are just synonymous with bigotry. Either way, they're shitty people.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 08:57 PM
-1

Is this in reference to someone specific or a certain event? I'm active duty and I can guarantee that most of the people I've served with would not say they fight for women in general, let alone these women. Some have served to provide for their family, including women family members, but most are just trying to get good job experience and to pay for college.
/r/MensRights23/03/21 08:55 PM
9

Could you imagine the outrage if that were reversed? I mean, they don't even realize how ridiculous it is without changing it. It's like saying "only real men have money." They're literally reducing themselves to objects to be had by other people.
/r/MensRights18/03/21 09:36 PM
1

you really shouldn't be getting downvoted Downvotes don't really bother me and thanks for the support. People on reddit tend to hop onto downvote trains. I've also garnered a fair amount of downvotes on this sub, but every sub centered around a hot button socio-political issue tends to get a bit "echo-chamber"y.
/r/MensRights15/03/21 01:47 AM
8

KKK, Nazis, Feminism, McCartysm At that point you're saying that basically every extremist group is just like the Nazis, which is meaningless comparison at that point.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 05:53 PM
9

Be as provocative as possible and then show that men are not angry, women-hating violent rapists when no aggression is shown. From what we were told this sounds like a 0% possibility.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 05:17 PM
5

There are extremist groups all across the entire socio-political spectrum: antifa, parts of the BLM movement, radical feminists, actual Nazis, etc. All of those groups preach some sort of "insert X group is inferior to us and we should stamp them out/remove their rights/so on and so forth." You could go around and say that all of these situations are just like the beginnings of Nazi Germany, but at that point the comparison loses all meaning.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 05:16 PM
-3

I know about the Nazis rise to power, including the shit before the camps, so cool it with the accusations of idiocy. We're talking about small, vocal groups of people in a country of ~325 million. The Nazis were a political party well before Hitler took over the country. People on trains with smart phones and men-hating teachers in liberal arts groups are not the same. And before we head down the slippery slope argument of "well, it could escalate over time to these groups picking someone to le…
/r/MensRights14/03/21 05:12 PM
20

to what end, I do not know To get him to attack them or speak aggressively, therefore having video "evidence" that all men are angry, women-hating, violent rapists.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 04:01 PM
-15

BTW this is so similar to how nazi Germany started No it is not. Please do not make comparisons like this; it just detracts from the actual situation.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 04:00 PM
13

Bad idea. Not only would you have proved their shitty point, but they also would have had video evidence of them just asking questions and you escalating the situation. The best thing to do, if you can't leave the area, is to take out your own phone and start filming them.
/r/MensRights14/03/21 03:59 PM
0

Yes, I agree that is the argument used to handwave away violent male deaths. The point of contrition isn't whether or not that argument is used, but that it doesn't fall under the umbrella of "victim blaming."
/r/MensRights14/03/21 03:50 AM
-1

No. The implication is that men die because of other men, so it is a non-issue. The focus is on the perpetrator, not the victim.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 10:52 PM
1

I understand your point and, respectfully, I still don't think it's victim blaming. The popular example of victim blaming is a woman gets raped and the cops/social media/the judge/etc. says something like "well, if you weren't wearing a skirt, then you wouldn't have been raped." In this case, the argument is that something the victim did directly led to the crime being committed. In the argument of "well, men kill men so why should we care about male victims," the blame isn't being placed on the…
/r/MensRights13/03/21 06:23 PM
4

Surely you can see the problem. I absolutely understand the problem of the legal definitions of rape and the way society views male victims of sexual assault. I'm in the military and only recently did the UCMJ change the definitions of rape/sexual assault to gender neutral. That's very different than the claim that men actively die from rape by women. A better way to phrase that argument is that the treatment of men following sexual assault allegations or sexual assault itself leads to men feeli…
/r/MensRights13/03/21 06:10 PM
2

Lots of men die from rape by a female Uh, can you provide something to back that up? There is a lot of proof behind sexual assault and rape against men, but the claim that lots of men die from rape by women is a very bold one.
/r/MensRights13/03/21 05:59 PM
0

Call out their victim blaming bullshit I don't think that's victim blaming, though. I think a better example of victim blaming would be: men tend to be killed by muggers more than women are because muggers view men as more threatening and are more likely to kill them in the heat of the situation. Trying to argue that "men kill men" so it shouldn't matter is more like whataboutism, similar to when a white police officer kills a black man and a lot of people bring up an argument like "what about b…
/r/MensRights13/03/21 05:58 PM
2

Can we get some context behind this?
/r/MensRights13/03/21 03:21 AM
1

So yeah, now you get the picture I was trying to paint. If you need further explanation feel free to ask It seemed like the meme was referencing a specific event (the PPD thing and therapy), not reddit as a whole.
/r/MensRights05/03/21 08:56 PM
2

What's the story behind this?
/r/MensRights04/03/21 07:28 PM
2

Yes. How did you not understand the basis of "accidentally" if you read the article?
/r/MensRights01/03/21 02:56 AM
0

If all you focus on is bad marriages, than I can see how you'd feel that way. When was the last time you talked to or read stories about couples that have been together for 50+ years?
/r/MensRights01/03/21 02:55 AM
1

This article speaks out against that.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 02:53 AM
0

Maybe read it and you'll understand what she means.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 02:53 AM
2

How do you accidentally abuse someone... By not knowing/realizing that your actions are abusive.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 02:52 AM
-1

No one can "accidentally abuse" another, unless they are trained that their behavior "isn't abuse" because the person they are abusing "has power." I'm gonna go ahead and assume you didn't read the article either, because she never once talks about her husband "having power" or something like that. She was behaving in a way conditioned into her by society and didn't realize it was abusive for a long time.
/r/MensRights01/03/21 02:52 AM
13

You can't accidentally abuse someone. I think you absolutely can. It's not that the actions she was doing were by accident, but until the time of writing the article, she never realized they were abuse. Before people jump down my throat, I am not defending the way she treated her husband, but I do understand if, for a time, she did not realize how bad it was. Like she said, a lot of women are conditioned by media and other women into having a very controlling attitude at home, especially when a …
/r/MensRights01/03/21 02:49 AM
2

This post has literally nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights26/02/21 08:35 PM
0

This post isn't addressing anything. It's just a picture (which could easily be doctored, but w/e) about someone complaining about dislikes on youtube.
/r/MensRights26/02/21 08:34 PM
11

1/2 a million images is probably a very inflated number. What's more likely is that there are a lot of videos and each frame is considered a separate picture/image. Similar to when police make drug busts, they tend to include paraphernalia in the total weight of the drugs confiscated.
/r/MensRights17/02/21 10:49 PM
21

Where were you when more actual people voted for Clinton in 2016? American redditor here. The popular vote means nothing.
/r/MensRights13/11/20 12:27 PM
3

The biggest change isn't the gender, but the age depicted by the statues. The first one is a young toddler, whereas the second one is at least somewhat pubescent based on having developed breasts. Child nudity is generally not a problem, like having young boys and girls shirtless at a beach, for example.
/r/MensRights15/09/20 07:54 PM
-1

The problem is that the mother of the older boy is the one who made the post, not the mother of the girl. What the older brother did is not okay, regardless of what the girl did and both children should be punished. We don't know the other side of the story, so it isn't safe to say if the girl is getting off free from her mom.
/r/MensRights24/07/20 10:38 AM
1

How so?
/r/MensRights24/07/20 10:33 AM
1

Of course, but they are options a couple can use before they resort to a vasectomy.
/r/MensRights24/01/20 12:32 AM
2

are currently the only reliable options we have. Birth control implants and IUD's are almost 100% reliable.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 11:58 PM
7

It's not.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 11:56 PM
2

Vasectomy is literally his only option for having unprotected sex with this entitled hag She could also use birth control (obviously she's not trustworthy, though) or spermicidal gel. He had plenty of options.
/r/MensRights23/01/20 11:56 PM
3

Really, really great.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 08:44 AM
-1

Current active duty US Navy submariner: Sexual harassment/assault in the military is an issue, but occurs at roughly the same percentage as in the civilian world. It just tends to be more headlined in the military. Same as number 1, but also a reminder that sexual abuse also occurs between people of the same sex. I'm currently stationed on an all male submarine and we've had cases of sexual harassment. This is definitely not true, at least for the Navy. The Navy's SAPR (sexual assault prevention…
/r/MensRights05/01/20 08:43 AM
2

The draft hasn't existed in the same form as it was during the World Wars/Korea/Vietnam, but it exists currently as the selective service program. The selective service program/system is used to maintain information on military eligible people in case the draft is reinstated and all males in the US between 18-25 have to be enrolled in it or face legal action.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 08:25 AM
1

I was circumcised shortly after birth, so I can't tell you what it was like before that, but sex and masturbation are enjoyable for me.
/r/MensRights05/01/20 08:17 AM
-2

Literally every legitimate medical study says it’s the same or shorter. Can you source that? It doesn't make any sense, tbh; how is it less sensitive and you last for less time?
/r/MensRights05/01/20 08:15 AM
2

None of those are double standards on their own, though. If she made posts about how unfair it is that men only want thicc, big titty, goth girls and then posted this kind of thing, then yeah, that's a double standard. Having a standard for the type of person you want isn't inherently bad.
/r/MensRights17/09/19 07:37 AM
22

Injustice in our justice system is a huge problem for men and a focus of the MRM. A lot of men are unfairly treated by police and the courts because they are men and a lot of women get off very easily.
/r/MensRights05/09/19 11:48 AM
5

The "some sort of ism" = prejudice + power has been a thing for a while. Racism, sexism, etc. It used to be true, when there were clear differences between racism/sexism and bigotry, where the "ism's" usually referred to enforced government policies (women not being able to vote was sexism, for example) and bigotry/discrimination were actions taken by regular people (like firing a black person for being black). Nowadays, many people, especially new-wave feminists use "sexism" and "bigotry" inter…
/r/MensRights29/08/19 04:30 AM
3

I'm not claiming to be the full authority on what should/should not be posted; I'm voicing my opinion on the negative effects of posting things unrelated to the MRM here, especially when they could be viewed as just bashing other people. Keeping things on topic for a subreddit isn't censorship. One of the mod policies says that "off-topic posts will be removed," so the mods have established precedent for policing irrelevant posts.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 03:10 AM
3

The issue I have with posts like this is what people would glean about the MRM from it. Imagine someone coming onto this subreddit and the first post they see is about a couple of lesbians being shitty to each other, which honestly has nothing to do with men's rights. Keeping posts about proper topics results in a better portrayal of us to outsiders, so it is worth it to police posts like this one.
/r/MensRights26/08/19 02:59 AM
1

Automatically ignoring people who ask questions you don't like doesn't help anything. It's a perfectly reasonable question in this case, because a woman being shitty to another woman has basically nothing to do with men's rights.
/r/MensRights25/08/19 06:45 AM
-2

For thousands of years Jewish rabbis have noted that circumcision causes men to associate sex with pain, decrease sensitivity during sex, make men feel ashamed of their penises, etc. Do you have a source or something for that? I'm Jewish and that isn't really at all what I've seen across a decent amount of Jewish communities (multiple states in the US and also Israel). It is certainly noted and understood that circumcision decreases pleasure, but it isn't being done to cause pain during sex or a…
/r/MensRights23/05/19 10:08 AM
2

To be fair, being a woman on 4chan probably isn't much better than being Jewish.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 11:10 AM
82

Not quite sure what you expected from Tumblr.
/r/MensRights20/04/19 02:50 PM
201

Not if the baby is male, because men can never, ever, EVER be the victims of sexual abuse, obviously. /s
/r/MensRights16/02/19 08:30 PM
3

Neither of those quotes do anything to prove that America isn't a patriarchy (I agree that it's not, btw). Max O'Rell's quote, while it may have some merit, comes off as conspiratorial rather than factual. It's very easy to say that some people rule from "behind the scenes;" proving that is obviously far more difficult. Albert Einstein's quote doesn't really negate the idea of a patriarchy, but just demonstrates motivation behind the actions of most men. He's saying that men work for women, in t…
/r/MensRights04/12/18 01:53 AM
2

If that's true, then it's clear evidence of a problem, but everyone here is just speculating that that is what happened.
/r/MensRights25/06/18 05:50 PM
2

this fuck up was a direct result of politics and gender diversity crap. Any proof for that?
/r/MensRights25/06/18 05:49 PM
11

She also has 2 years probation and mandatory substance testing and abuse counseling. Those are also part of the sentence and should not be left out. Also, this kind of progress is something we should be happy about. Not so long ago, barely anyone would even try to go after women for false accusations, let alone convict and sentence them. Progress is progress, even if it's slow.
/r/MensRights24/06/18 03:43 AM
1

Yes, I have. Are you arguing with me? I literally said that, in actuality, the justice system is heavily biased when it comes to awarding custody. Did you read my whole comment?
/r/MensRights15/06/18 10:20 PM
2

Theoretically, but very rarely in reality. That's what I said.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 10:05 PM
1

Yes.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 06:01 PM
1

Don't get me wrong, I think the current system of custody and child support is pretty terrible. What I was pointing out was the issue with OP's post, where he made it seem like his child support payments were increased for no reason ("well, just because)." The COL also will have increased for the party paying child support / alimony. So by the logic of basing it off COL increases, the monthly payment shouldn't increase since it equally increased for the party making payments. I agree with you he…
/r/MensRights15/06/18 05:10 PM
6

Isn't child support sexist by implying that women need to be taken care of financially by men? By design? No, because child support goes to the person with custody, which can be a man. In actuality? Yes, but mostly because the justice system has a severe sexual bias when awarding custody. ... shouldn't they be at the very least paying $0.77 cents to every dollar on their child that the man contributes? This makes no sense at all, because the assumption (and reality) is that the person with custo…
/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:05 PM
2

They didn't do it "just because," though; they did it as a cost of living adjustment, because the cost of living changes over time. It's not for no reason at all.
/r/MensRights15/06/18 04:02 PM
1

Yeah, I totally agree that it does happen.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 11:09 PM
1

Death is permanent. People can get out on life in prison.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 09:56 PM
3

Not for this case, it doesn't.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 09:56 PM
3

Literally not what I said, but go ahead and jump to defending a point I never even disagreed with, bro. The title of your post falsely summarizes an article, which itself doesn't even say what they were charged with. If both of them had been convicted of the same crime and were sentenced to different sentences, then your post would be accurate. I am not saying that this never happens, because it plainly does, but the article you linked to is not an example of it.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 09:55 PM
5

Based on what the article says, they did not commit the same crime. It seems that the man carried out most, if not all, of the physical abuse.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 08:45 PM
1

Your last sentence doesn't matter at all. It's pointless to compare her crime to a different one. She falsely accused someone of rape, which is a different crime than rape itself.
/r/MensRights11/06/18 10:03 PM
1

It's not a minority treatment at all. It's because they want to protect women because they're the weaker sex and they value their lives more. The whole "women and children first" thing wasn't because people thought women were a minority in society.
/r/MensRights03/06/18 12:13 AM
-2

Are we trying to ban sex-based humor or something? Lighten the fuck up.
/r/MensRights02/06/18 11:57 PM
1

How is that relevant?
/r/MensRights02/06/18 11:56 PM
21

Wow, it's almost like Tumblr (along with most of the popular social media sites) is an SJW cesspool. Definitely gonna buy a couple of these later.
/r/MensRights31/05/18 07:25 PM
2

It'd be like Hillary Clinton doing an AMA on the donald subreddit. Yeah, you can call it public relations, but the subreddit is more than likely going to hostile and there probably won't be a lot of fair dialogue. Obviously, this subreddit would not be that bad, but people here can be very, very militant in their ideas, feelings, and perceptions concerning police roles in things like shootings and domestic violence calls.
/r/MensRights08/04/18 08:39 PM
11

Tbh, I wouldn't be surprised if the AMA just ended with a lot of accusations and shitty treatment of the cop, with stuff like "why the fuck do you guys always arrest the man," or "why do you guys always use more violent methods in confrontations with men?" Those are fair questions to ask (mostly for the people in charge), but most cops are doing as they're trained or what their regulations say. Already, three of the comments in this thread are just assuming the cop is going to lie a lot to prote…
/r/MensRights08/04/18 10:14 AM
1

I'm totally okay with this, so long as they apply it to the other side (which they never do). If women can't be sexist towards men, because sexism is about oppressive systems (like racism), then men can't be sexist towards women either. Saying that you think women should be subservient to men isn't sexist because it's not a system of oppression; it's just bigotry. Do feminists/SJWs ever apply the same concept to men and women/blacks and whites? Of fucking course not.
/r/MensRights31/03/18 06:35 PM
-1

FatLady Femzilla (FLF) was absolutely not destroyed in any way and actually tried to reasonably bring up arguments and statistics. The RightEquality (RE) user acted like an asshole quite a lot. Right from the start, RE pretty much said "fuck you" to a reasonable statement that part of the reason may get higher prison sentences is due to prior convictions. Yes, it's true that men also get higher sentences for first time convictions too, but you don't have to talk exclusively about one or the othe…
/r/MensRights01/03/18 06:28 AM
4

I'd really like to go see it, but 3pm on a Monday is a pretty inaccessible time for a lot of people.
/r/MensRights01/03/18 01:33 AM
3

Burden of proof goes where? It should go on the person trying to prove that they're being paid less because of their sex, but things don't always go that way.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 02:28 AM
-13

That situation only happens if the woman in question has reason to believe that she's being paid less for being a woman. Despite how this subreddit views women, most women are not like that. It's the vocal tumblr/reddit feminazis who go on and on about the patriarchy and the wage gap and it's regular women with jobs who actually know how the jobforce works.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 12:58 AM
-11

You only have to go through bullshit if the woman in question thinks the man is getting paid more for being a man and, despite what this subreddit thinks, not all women are vile, scheming bitches who think men should rot and any man who makes more than them only does so because of the patriarchy.
/r/MensRights04/01/18 12:56 AM
-14

Less raises because if they give one person a raise they have to give every woman a raise as well. That is absolutely not at all how the bill works. It doesn't make it so you can't pay a man more than a woman; it makes it so you can't pay a man more than a woman (or vice versa) based on sex. Holy fuck, dude.
/r/MensRights03/01/18 11:16 PM
-4

Is this actually a men's rights issue? If you don't like the dress code at work, complain to your boss and if he/she refuses to change it, then either deal with it or look into getting a different job. It's not like the government is forcing these clothes on you or the enforced dress code is highly sexual and demeaning. If a bar won't let you in because you're wearing shorts (which is pretty weird, never seen it or heard about that until now), then go to a different bar. Or, again, complain to t…
/r/MensRights30/12/17 04:29 AM
2

The sorts of places where you hang out, this post you submitted would get you banned from the group. What place is that? I'd like you to please be specific, with comments of mine showing me in those places. It is you that is ignoring the problem. Except that I'm fucking not. Unlike you, I have enough emotional capacity to care about both men and women. Yes, it is absolutely abhorrent that men's suicide rates are far higher than women's and that is something we in the MRM have been fighting to ch…
/r/MensRights19/04/17 11:04 AM
2

Maybe I should read the article... my personal policy is to never read Huffpo. Then you should probably never comment on anything they write or post, tbh. You ignoring that sharp rise in women's suicide rate is just as bad as them ignoring that male suicide rates have always been higher. Both sides of that are important to the discussion.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 10:30 AM
1

What place needs more attention from law enforcement, the one with the 20% rise (=20 extra victims) or the one with the 100% rise (=2 extra victims)? Both of them do. Absolutes and percentages are both important and percentages are arguably better for trend analysis over time.
/r/MensRights19/04/17 10:29 AM
3

Maybe for you. My parents only dated for a bit over a year and have been married ~25 years. My dad's parents dated for less than that and have been married for over 60 years. It's not just about time; it's also about the people.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 09:11 AM
18

*About some marriages, you mean. This absolutely does not apply to all couples, so stop fucking acting like it does.
/r/MensRights18/04/17 09:10 AM
14

You unsubscribed because they brought on a guest whose views you disagree with?
/r/MensRights07/03/17 08:11 AM
2

People become accessories because they knew of a crime and didn't report it. Yes, accessory to a crime is exactly a thing, but that doesn't apply here. Even if you could justify the death of the infant as manslaughter (negligent homicide is not incredibly unreasonable), I still don't think it would be right to charge anyone but the surgeon who performed the circumcision. For example, you read an article about a theft. The article is found in a guy's car. Your wording confused me here. What do yo…
/r/MensRights05/03/17 09:44 AM
2

You make some good points, but I don't fully agree with you. For one, the article you linked is incredibly brief and leaves out what seems to be an important detail: was the circumcision medically necessary or not? Your entire post hinges entirely on the "fact" of it not being necessary, but the necessity of the circumcision is never discussed. How do you know it wasn't medically necessary? I hope they charge everyone involved Charge them with what? Medical malpractice lawsuits are already a thi…
/r/MensRights05/03/17 07:30 AM
6

So, countries that are frequently involved in wars are full of pedophiles? You kinda lost me there.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 11:32 AM
1

One of my friends in highschool had to get part of his earlobe amputated because he didn't care for a piercing and it got infected. Anecdotes don't really mean much to me, tbh, but if you have some statistics behind how often circumcision wounds get infected, that'd be much appreciated.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 11:20 AM
-10

I wouldn't really say they are all excellent points. The "wound in diaper" one is pretty flimsy, imo, and is really dependent on how attentive the parents are. You could say the same about any wound a baby might incur. The same goes for the intense psychological trauma. Babies cry all the fucking time, including when they feel just about any pain. I'm not saying this makes it okay to inflict pain, but in a baby's mind it is probably not very different than if they had fallen or got scraped or so…
/r/MensRights24/02/17 10:06 AM
2

I guess just go right ahead and call people who disagree with you mentally deranged. Sure. As far as I've read, there isn't a whole lot of research connecting negative events in infancy (especially <1 month old) and lasting psychological effects. I could certainly be wrong on that, though, so feel free to correct me if I am.
/r/MensRights24/02/17 10:02 AM
1

Yes, I totally agree that she's pressuring him into having sex with her, but the exact wording you used was "forced... at all costs," and I don't think there was anything in there to back that up.
/r/MensRights27/12/16 10:21 AM
3

I totally agree with that. If you eat like shit, you shouldn't complain about putting on weight. However, that doesn't mean that people have to eat healthy, exercise, etc., if they don't want to.
/r/MensRights26/12/16 09:42 AM
2

How exactly is he being "forced to have sex with her at all costs?" Is he facing legal trouble if he doesn't fuck her? Is she beating him, force feeding him viagra, and using him? Is it a shitty situation for them? Fuck yeah, since she likes living a certain way and he isn't attracted to her when she puts on weight, but I don't really see how he is being forced to have sex with her.
/r/MensRights26/12/16 09:40 AM
2

How is he being forced, though? I could see that maybe she could want to coerce him, like threatening divorce or something (even though sexual incompatibility is a pretty good reason to get a divorce), but I didn't really see anything in this constituting force. If anything, I'd say that the counseling is an effort by the both of them to work through it.
/r/MensRights26/12/16 09:38 AM
2

rules for all human beings. No, they most definitely are not. People can do what they want
/r/MensRights26/12/16 09:35 AM
2

The same laws Tbh, I don't know of any laws that apply differently to men and women, so I'd appreciate it if you clued me in on those. No more fucking alimony Like, at all? Not even a woman paying alimony to a man would be allowed? child support as that is a form of slavery I'm gonna be totally honest and say that I think this statement here is pretty dumb and sounds like the exact kind of thing a SJW/feminists would try to say ("pregnancy is just a form of slavery enacted by the patriarchy" or …
/r/MensRights23/12/16 12:54 PM
-1

Do you think the title of this post is incredibly stupid and generalizing? I certainly do. Can you imagine if there was some post on a feminist subreddit with a title like "do you think men will ever recognize their privilege?" People here probably wouldn't be too happy about that. There are probably plenty of women out there (like the ones who are well informed of the MRM) who recognize the privilege of their gender and try to fight it. Tbh, having titles and posts like this only serve to hurt …
/r/MensRights23/12/16 12:45 PM
1

Fucking hell, this subreddit is a fucking joke sometimes. Learn to take a bit of humor and laugh a bit.
/r/MensRights20/12/16 09:15 AM
7

Maybe she's trying to give a reason that selfish feminists should care.
/r/MensRights11/12/16 05:33 AM
1

I guess I can see that. My bad on that misunderstanding.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 01:58 PM
1

Drunken sex isn't rape (unless they are really, really drunk). This sentence right here is incredibly dangerous, because there's no objective measure to it. This is why, legally, a DUI can only be given if the driver has a certain BAC. It is not based on "how drunk they are." Rape is sex without consent and there is absolutely an argument to be made that someone who is sufficiently intoxicated (as you said) is not capable of giving consent. This doesn't mean that the sex is rape, because the con…
/r/MensRights09/12/16 01:57 PM
1

What do you mean by "the whole story?" As far as I can tell, the story is that she had a great night with a guy, but then kinda regretted it after she found it he was a Trump supporter. Pretty reasonable, imo.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 01:44 PM
2

Nowhere in any of the linked images (the texts, the 4chan posts, or even the Toronto Life article) does she ever mention the word rape, let alone claim that it happened to her. Seriously, here is the actual article. You can read through it or just Ctrl+f for rape and you won't find it. If she did claim rape (one of the images mentions a possible facebook post where someone claims she was pressing charges), then yes, we should be outraged and should fight against that sort of thing. However, if s…
/r/MensRights09/12/16 09:33 AM
1

Why take this one seriously? Because it's something you want to see as proof? Regardless of the content, it's still a 4chan post, the truth of which is extremely dubious at best. Also, nowhere in any of the images does she claim he raped her. She just said she kinda regrets it because he's a Trump supporter. In fact, if she's not claiming rape, we should be celebrating, because she's an example of someone who doesn't think that regret = rape.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 09:22 AM
2

It doesn't.
/r/MensRights09/12/16 09:19 AM
2

I read the entire post and nowhere in there does she ever claim that he raped her. Can you link directly to the image you're referring to in case I'm just not seeing it?
/r/MensRights09/12/16 09:18 AM
0

I'm not exactly sure what you're issue with the article is, apart from that there isn't a companion article about causes of violent deaths of men. Isn't an article that helps to disprove the idea of "violent, dangerous, strange men preying on innocent women" a good thing? Her analysis of the numbers may be wrong, but the sentiment is still true. Also, the author (Rachel Flaherty) has written articles about men and men's safety in the past, like this one, where she wanted to draw attention to a m…
/r/MensRights25/11/16 10:39 PM
5

Yes, exactly.
/r/MensRights23/11/16 02:11 PM
15

Sounds illegal to me, to discriminate based on gender. Nah, bro, didn't you know that you can't discriminate against men because they hold all of the power?
/r/MensRights23/11/16 08:04 AM
-1

What's the problem here? You're butthurt or something because you got downvoted? Or do you think you got downvoted because it portrays a man in a good fatherly role? Or... ummmm... yeah, no idea what the issue you're trying to convey is.
/r/MensRights14/11/16 04:47 AM
8

That site (Australian Department for Child Protection and Family Support) was last updated on 04 September 2015 and the description of the men's domestic violence helpline has been changed since this picture was taken. It now reads: This [phone number] provides counselling for men who are concerned about their violent and abusive behaviours. Yeah, thanks a fuckton.
/r/MensRights02/11/16 09:31 AM
-1

Russian Roulette is random chance and marriage is not. I plan on eventually getting married, but to someone I've known for a long while by then.
/r/MensRights30/10/16 01:53 AM
0

Do people here think every woman is out there just marry and divorce a man for his money?
/r/MensRights30/10/16 01:02 AM
2

Because you think every woman is out there to try and get your money and house from you?
/r/MensRights30/10/16 01:01 AM
1

Oh, sorry I'm not the amazing linguist you are, Mr. English Professor. Maybe my lowly layman speak was too far removed from your vast intelligence for you to understand it and properly form a rebuttal to the points I raised in contrast to your's. Allow me to summarize for you: You claimed that the earnings gap is actually indicative of female privilege and then proceeded to not actually back that up with your post. I refuted your statement in what seemed to be a fairly understandable and simple …
/r/MensRights20/10/16 01:40 AM
1

So, I don't think you're actually disagreeing with me even though it kinda sounds like you are and you maybe intended to. I'll skip point 1 and come back to it, but for point 2 I thought I made it pretty clearly that men being the majority of workplace deaths is an example of female privilege. Tbh, I'm not 100% what point you're trying to make, but the point I was making was that OP's idea that "earnings gap = female privilege" was not supported by the points he laid out. Point 3 is honestly, im…
/r/MensRights16/10/16 10:04 AM
1

Wanting to be more attractive (in all aspects) to the opposite sex is obviously incredibly important to evolution and attraction subconsciously drives virtually everyone. I definitely agree that a desire to impress women drives a lot of men to work more and make more money and there are some who may be doing that and not even realizing it, but I still disagree that this is an example of female privilege (not that you are arguing that it is).
/r/MensRights16/10/16 09:42 AM
1

Care to elaborate on what you mean, because I never said that women aren't privileged, if that's what you're implying. In fact, there were multiple times where I acknowledged the very real existence of female privilege. What my comment was meant to do was refute OP's idea that the points he brought up prove that the earnings gap is an example of female privilege. It's like saying that a male only draft is an example of male privilege because it provides an easier door into a certain career field…
/r/MensRights15/10/16 12:23 PM
1

Do they really think women, even today, aren't pressuring men to be the primary breadwinner? They don't think that because many modern feminists don't think about men's issues at all. Usually it's because they've been lied to and led to believe that men don't face issues in modern society or they somewhat know the truth and deliberately avoid it because they have based their status in society around their perceived victimhood and they can't bear to acknowledge that shit sucks for a lot of people…
/r/MensRights15/10/16 12:20 PM
1

So society and specially women do not pressure men to work harder? Not sure if you're interpreting that from what I said, but there absolutely is societal pressure on men to work and provide for their family. But again women are geneticatically conditioned to ignored male suffering Any scientific backup behind this? Not saying you're wrong, just I'd like to see if it's actually based in genetics and not just social conditioning.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 12:17 PM
1

Agreed
/r/MensRights15/10/16 11:45 AM
2

I think I might be able to summarize the study you linked better than the quote from it you chose, since I honestly think that quote doesn't tell their story well until you read through the math and examples. What they're saying is: because of various factors (they specifically name oppression and discrimination, so I'm going to take what they say with a grain of salt, tbh), men make more money than women (this is empirically true, though typically not for the same work). Because of this, women …
/r/MensRights15/10/16 11:18 AM
5

The argument they try to make is that women don't "choose" to preference home>work, because society forces them to. What they consistently fail to mention is that society has changed a lot since first-wave feminism and the workforce has opened up a lot to women, while home-life and childcare is still mostly closed off to men.
/r/MensRights15/10/16 10:55 AM
8

I pretty much have to disagree with you across the board. I'm not disagreeing with the fact that the things you pointed exist, but the "connection" to the earnings gap that you implied (and then never actually backed up). (1) Imo, you shouldn't try to bring up men working longer hours as female privilege if this subreddit is also going to use women choosing to work fewer hours as a factor in the earnings gap. If men are choosing to work longer hours (to provide more for their families, for examp…
/r/MensRights15/10/16 07:11 AM
13

Your tone for this is coming off pretty weirdly to me, almost like you're not appreciative. Is the world ideal for men? Fuck no, but that's true for everyone. Take it as a sign that things are changing for the better and steps are being made in the right direction.
/r/MensRights13/10/16 11:25 AM
2

How is this a men's issue if it's good for men? Higher penalty for prosecutors hiding/altering exculpatory evidence (evidence which is favorable to the defendant) means that fewer prosecutors will be willing to take that risk, so more exculpatory evidence will be preserved and used in trials. Which is good for the defendants, which are mostly male, according to OP. Sounds like a good thing for men, imo.
/r/MensRights07/10/16 07:28 AM
1

How are you to ensure she isn't exaggerating about how drunk she was weeks or years later when she decided it was rape? This is why I literally said that it is a terrible law based on something which is far too subjective. You misinterpreted and oversimplified what the law says (it doesn't say that it is illegal to have sex with a drunk woman) and then also used that to make a leap in logic which would only be kinda correct if your wording of the law was also correct. It's like... if it's illega…
/r/MensRights06/10/16 11:08 AM
2

If it is illegal to have sex with a drunk woman, it surely means that it is also illegal for a woman to have sex while drunk. Would she be committing a criminal act by participating? No, it doesn't mean that and she wouldn't be committing a criminal act. I'm not sure how this isn't obvious. Also, the law doesn't make it illegal to have sex with a drunk woman; it forces a minimum sentence on someone convicted of having sex with a woman who is too intoxicated to give consent. Obviously, this is st…
/r/MensRights06/10/16 10:00 AM
1

Pointing out obvious examples of disadvantages to being male doesn't mean that no advantages exist. "You mean like the "privilege" to not be allowed to vote if I don't register for the draft?" Women couldn't vote for ~150 years in the U.S. and there are plenty of countries in the world were women are still politically oppressed (primarily Muslim countries operating under Sharia law). "You mean like the "privilege" of dying on average 5-7 years earlier then most women?" This one is purely biologi…
/r/MensRights02/10/16 06:20 AM
1

This may not be a popular opinion on this subreddit, but it's fairly hypocritical to deny male privilege while simultaneously complaining about/bringing awareness to female privilege. Privilege doesn't necessarily mean that your life is automatically going to be better or easier in every aspect; what it really means (not what most SJWs think, if you can call it thinking) is that some experiences/interactions may be more favorable for you because of your race/gender/religion/economic status/etc.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 06:10 AM
1

And if a woman rapes a man and gets pregnant, the man still gets no choice when it comes to the fetus/baby.
/r/MensRights02/10/16 05:53 AM
9

What's this got to do with men's rights? Nothing. It's obviously an issue, but it's definitely not a men's rights issue.
/r/MensRights01/10/16 03:08 AM
2

Post titles like these only accomplish to give this subreddit a worse reputation than it already has. Also, this pretty much has no relation to men's rights and doesn't really accomplish anything.
/r/MensRights29/09/16 11:43 AM
2

The whole concept of "privilege" is fucking stupid. I disagree. The idea that people will have a natural advantage in some circumstances due to factors such as race, sex, and socioeconomic standing is 100% true. What liberals consistently fail to mention (through ignorance or attempts at hiding the truth) is that virtually every single group of people has some sort of advantage over others. Where liberals go to far with this is attributing all successes of white males to privilege and blaming al…
/r/MensRights20/09/16 09:26 AM
2

Currently active duty right now and I work with a lot of submariners. One of the things I've found is the harsh environment is actually used to get rid of bigotry in people. Find out someone's a homophobe? Within hours pretty much everyone on the sub is going to be grabbing their crotch and trying to play gay chicken with them until it doesn't bother them anymore. Racist? Have fun getting ignored by every single person of your race, so you have to do all of your work with other races. It's quite…
/r/MensRights20/09/16 09:19 AM
8

Agreed, and it's quite hypocritical of this sub, given how vehemently against female quotas in science and engineering people seem to be.
/r/MensRights06/09/16 08:57 PM
-4

Yeah, I would be, since I'm an obvious straw man for your argument /s. Really though, I don't think my point was so damn outrageous that it merited such a response, but I'll reiterate, since I may have been unclear: the man was helping to raise the girl, so to take that money away from the girl is a disservice to her. That's the basis behind child support. However, I believe (as I said), that changes if the mother or the court is refusing to grant visitation to the man. If he helped raise the gi…
/r/MensRights24/08/16 11:28 AM
-9

I fucking hate the titles of articles like this, because they draw attention to the wrong fucking part of the issue. Child support is not about genetic paternity or maternity: it's about providing continual support for the child even after the parents have split up. Taking away an entire source of support for the child because of a divorce is what they want to avoid. What I do take a huge fucking issue with is the fact that the man is being denied visitation rights. If he's being forced to help …
/r/MensRights24/08/16 07:44 AM
-4

Cool it there. Not every feminist is behind this and most women probably don't give a shit. The issue resides with the extreme feminist vocal minority who see tons of imbalances and issues where there really are known. They scare institutions like Harvard because they typically have a lot of media attention (especially social media) and getting on their bad side can be disastrous for whoever they decide to bring their wrath upon.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 11:10 AM
2

What kind of a tub of shit institution comes up with this kind of feminist drivel? Uhhh... a lot of them? This is a thing in a huge amount of popular or well known colleges, especially ones with more of a liberal arts focus. This is absolutely not a problem only with Harvard.
/r/MensRights17/08/16 11:08 AM
2

Your post title 100% focuses on the wrong part of the issue, imo. If a man helps raise a child and helps provide for that child's upbringing, then he should pay child support after a divorce if he is not the main caretaker, regardless of whether or not he is the real father. The mother and, more importantly, the child were reliant on support from him and to take that away is a disservice to the child. All of that goes out the fucking window, imo, as soon as the man no longer gets visitation righ…
/r/MensRights29/07/16 05:19 AM
2

How about we don't have some crazy overreaction and just fire her or have monitors observe classroom instruction? That sounds much more reasonable than treating her like someone who beats or rapes children.
/r/MensRights25/07/16 03:22 AM
1

Fair enough
/r/MensRights20/07/16 10:51 PM
5

"I hate liars. There is no way to justify calling her beautiful. She's extremely ugly." Rudely put, but honest? Yes. Racist and sexist? Only because it was towards a black woman.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 08:16 AM
2

"Cites a skewed statistic". "Disbelieves an study/article I link to." I have a bit of an issue with these two, since it kinda seems like you're saying it's okay to disbelieve things they cite, but they aren't allowed to disbelieve ones you cite.
/r/MensRights20/07/16 05:12 AM
13

She's upset that men she isn't attracted to are talking to her.
/r/MensRights15/07/16 10:24 AM
14

The main issue I have with this is that the formatting of the graphs switches a couple times, including to one less capable at presenting data. (not sure if OP is the creator of this or just posting it). The first couple of graphs has the X axis broken up into groups based on race and differentiates between subdivisions by color, which is a fantastic presentation method, allowing one to easily compare and contrast population % and % of deaths by cop easily and at a glance. Then it switches using…
/r/MensRights13/07/16 09:16 AM
1

??? The post is in absolutely no way saying that there should be fewer female protagonists in video games in movies and I'm honestly surprised you were able to draw that conclusion. It's pointing out how stupid the Bechdel test is and why it shouldn't be used to determine whether a film is good or fair to the sexes or whatever, when common tropes used for storytelling and character development are very frequently used for both men and women.
/r/MensRights13/07/16 08:53 AM
1

Your post title is very misleading. The article never says whether or not it's more okay to do it to men or women, just that if performed, it should be by someone of the same sex. In fact, the article barely addresses men or women in general and mostly focuses on the actual topic of forced catheterization.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 01:41 PM
2

Back up there man. There's a huge damn difference between collecting urine samples and murdering people.
/r/MensRights12/07/16 01:37 PM
8

It works to draw media attention and turn a lot of people against you. The Black Lives Matter movement has a good cause at its heart (fighting against the societal acceptance of violence against blacks), but like /u/omegaphallic said, their leadership is completely horrible. They have no idea how to properly market their cause, repeatedly rally behind cases they shouldn't (the Michael Brown shooting, for example), and have a habit of fighting against people who would normally be their allies (Se…
/r/MensRights07/07/16 11:45 AM
1

Her defense lawyer is trying to paint her in a better light in hopes of a better trial or sentencing outcome? How shocking. In actuality, the article is useful for pointing out the obviousness of female privilege in media/courtrooms. There’s no disputing that Heather Koon videotaped herself raping four children in an Elyria, Ohio, day care before sending the footage to her boyfriend, a convicted sex offender. What is up for debate, Wightman said, is whether Koon should be considered a violent se…
/r/MensRights07/07/16 09:35 AM
1

awalt?
/r/MensRights26/06/16 06:41 AM
1

I'd the say the same about you. What are you using to back up the claim that more workers = worse economy?
/r/MensRights26/06/16 04:08 AM
1

That's not how the draft works, though. The government drafts people in groups, as necessary. They don't just call up everyone with a draft number at once. That's also not how the military views their people, from what I've seen. Gone are the days of expendable grunts, because that would simply be a big waste of money. More available people makes the job force more competitive, as it should be, because you have to work harder to be better than more people. Also, more workers with more money = be…
/r/MensRights25/06/16 09:35 PM
1

Full out here, are you trying to say women should not have jobs because you think it messes with the economy and takes jobs away from men?
/r/MensRights25/06/16 06:34 AM
1

What don't they belong in? The military? I work with a lot of fantastic female military members and there is no problem with women in the military.
/r/MensRights25/06/16 06:33 AM
1

women in the work place. jobs being taken from men. I don't understand the point you're trying to make here. Are you saying women don't belong in the workplace or that they're taking jobs from men? I get that you're trying to draw some sort of analogy, but this part right here doesn't make sense to me.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 11:25 PM
1

It's a super unpopular opinion here, but I think women generally don't belong in combat roles, simply because they aren't as capable in those situations than men. If a woman can pass the same fitness standards and combat training as men, I have nothing against them in combat, but most can't/choose not to. War/the draft is absolute shit for everyone involved. I fully support whatever it takes to use our troops most effectively and if that means the front line is mostly (if not all) men and most (…
/r/MensRights24/06/16 11:23 PM
2

Okay, I understand, but I don't think that factors in a whole lot. I wasn't in the Army (currently in the Navy), but I'd assume that Army truck drivers in Iraq would have combat training, given how likely it was that they'd be caught in a combat situation. Even if more women were sent oversees due to the draft, I think they'd still be kept in less dangerous roles. Yes, the female death percentage would go up, but it would probably still be mostly men, albeit by a smaller margin.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 03:09 PM
3

... What? This might be because it's 1 in the morning, but I have no idea what you're trying to say.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 02:54 PM
8

Yes, they do get drafted to also fill support roles, so the more fit people can be sent to combat. There's no reason to put a combat capable person behind a desk when you can get someone whose leg was amputated below the knee to do that.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 12:36 PM
5

Combat is 100% absolutely not just about being able to fire a weapon towards the enemy.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 12:29 PM
75

Drafted does not mean sent to a combat role, though. Sure, it might make them a bit more hesitant, but it won't change the fact that men are the vast majority of combat deaths.
/r/MensRights24/06/16 03:02 AM
0

someone who thinks you are beneath them. Do you honestly believe every woman feels that way about men who aren't very attractive?
/r/MensRights24/06/16 03:00 AM
0

I think police should absolutely face prosecution if they willfully aided in convicting an innocent man, either by false testimony or withholding evidence. That's a completely different sentiment than your first post. Being complicit in the conviction of an innocent person and willfully and knowingly trying to convict an innocent person are so far removed from each other you might as well be comparing apples and corrupt oranges. Withholding evidence is illegal and policemen and lawyers do get pr…
/r/MensRights13/05/16 09:34 PM
10

Can you not make suggestions like that? This subreddit and the men's rights movement gets a bad enough reputation without people suggesting that people be fucking branded and publicly humiliated. Just sentence them to jail time and put them on the sex offender registry.
/r/MensRights13/05/16 08:55 PM
-4

Are you serious? Like, actually, truly serious about putting police behind bars if an innocent person is convicted of a crime and sentenced to jail time? For one, you would heavily cut down on actual police work, since many policemen would be afraid of being jailed. Cue many actual criminals not being sought after because the police don't want to risk jail time. Also, the police do not decide guilt/innocence, so you would send them to jail based completely on the decision of a different entity. …
/r/MensRights13/05/16 08:53 PM
1

You can't say un-drugged when talking about alcohol, though, since it absolutely fits the definition regardless of whether we tend to call it a drug or not. I agree with your statement, but I wouldn't say a drunk person is un-drugged.
/r/MensRights03/02/16 06:36 AM
6

Oh god, I'm losing the argument, ummm... Oh! I know! Let me call it victim blaming, that should help.
/r/MensRights06/07/15 11:50 PM
1

Discrimination is absolutely okay in some cases. For example, it's perfectly acceptable for Hooters to discriminate against small-chested women when looking to hire waitresses. Similarly, casting directors are discriminate against white men when looking to cast Michelle Obama in some sort of production. Both of those are, by the very definition, discrimination, but the word gets an unfairly bad rep because people just lump it together with bigotry/racism/sexism/etc. Obviously, what this person i…
/r/MensRights01/05/15 09:10 PM
2

Where in the picture is there any mention of equality? That seems like a picture by a group that obviously wants female supremacy and isn't trying to hide it behind anything.
/r/MensRights26/04/15 05:09 PM
3

Equality means you can hire the best for the job without prejudice. Personally, I'd change the word prejudice to bigotry, since prejudice isn't inherently bad. In fact, sometimes it makes sense to hire in a prejudiced fashion, like hiring black actors to play black people or hiring large chested women to work at Hooters. Kinda semantics, but there is a bit of a difference.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 01:36 AM
4

Their end goal is also completely unquantifiable in any reasonable way. No feminist has ever stepped up and said what they are actually working for beyond "equality." A goal with no specifics is usually not much of a goal.
/r/MensRights07/04/15 01:34 AM
1

Yes, that's quite funny, but is it any way related to men's rights? It seems like people leaping at the chance to make fun of some feminists (rightfully so), but that's hardly what this sub should be about.
/r/MensRights25/03/15 01:56 AM
1

Did you read the whole article? Near the end, they include the opinions of another student, who says True's actions started as merely challenging opinions but eventually progressed to levels similar to harassment. Whether or not this is true, we are presented with an alternate, understandable explanation for why he was banned from the discussions.
/r/MensRights20/03/15 07:17 AM
2

If it suits their goals, feminists will label anything misogynistic, regardless of whether or not it actually is.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 03:10 PM
22

Misogyny or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Patriarchy
/r/MensRights15/03/15 04:59 AM
34

I wonder how long it'll take for them to get together and burn a bunch of books written by white men. Maybe then, hopefully, some more people will realize how ridiculous these people are.
/r/MensRights15/03/15 04:43 AM
1

Yeah, that's not exactly why. Men paying the restaurant bills doesn't make the bill increase. Having an attractive waitress/waiter will make people more likely to buy more expensive food, buy more drinks (that's why bartenders are usually attractive and flirty), come back more often, etc. Having attractive waitresses instead of waiters pretty much only increases their tips, since a lot of the people paying the bill will be men, yes, but it's better for business for other reasons. As a restaurant…
/r/MensRights15/03/15 04:22 AM
3

Waiting tables is a huge one, everyone knows the prettier girl will get the job at a higher end place. If I was running a high end restaurant, I would definitely lean towards hiring attractive people as my waiters/waitresses. People are willing to tip more, buy more, come back more often, etc under those circumstances. If it comes down to two equally qualified/skilled people, I'd choose the better looking one every time. If the difference between them is gender, I'd honestly lean towards the fem…
/r/MensRights14/03/15 03:47 PM
2

I never presumed a best choice. I merely voiced my personal opinion that going over someone's head in a situation like this, based on the information we were given, is wrong according to the way I act and seems to be jumping the gun. Apparently this calls for personal attacks on me and tons of downvotes in place of an attempt at reasonable conversation. As much as it might bring more downvotes, this is exactly the kind of behavior I'd expect out of a place like SRS, not MensRights.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 09:37 PM
-11

Personally, if someone was wearing a bracelet like that, I'd talk to them first instead of just going over their head. Ask them why they wear it, discuss things about it with them, etc.
/r/MensRights08/03/15 06:57 AM
-19

Did you talk to the person wearing the bracelet first or just skip right past them and go to their boss?
/r/MensRights08/03/15 06:22 AM
2

Well, at least she honest about her intentions, as bad as they may be.
/r/MensRights28/01/15 08:00 PM
-1

I know what you mean, but that's not a very good point since no one has been drafted in the U.S. since Vietnam. I think a better version would be "if you don't have to sign up for the draft or risk losing your rights and going to jail, check your privilege."
/r/MensRights27/01/15 02:49 AM
2

If she claims to be a feminist and wants equality, but lets/insists the man pays for the meal/date, that's a dick move (hypocritical as well). If she were to insist the bill be split evenly, despite her portion of the meal costing a disproportionately high amount, like he did, then that's a dick move. If both parties are ok with the man paying for the date/meal and she's not one of the modern-I want all the "equality" with none of the responsibility-feminists, then that's ok.
/r/MensRights27/01/15 02:47 AM
43

Wait, you didn't get your membership check? With instructions on how to do the secret Patriarchy handshake? Man, that sucks. I remember when I got mine at 18, it was the coolest day of my life. Oh wait, no, I just signed up for the draft at 18.
/r/MensRights11/06/14 07:49 PM
3

a straight white cis male is the ultimate evil. FTFY.
/r/MensRights09/06/14 09:50 PM
18

Then it's a joke. I know people who, if they posted it, I would get a laugh out of it knowing they're joking. I also know people who would post this and mean it, which is no laughing matter.
/r/MensRights09/05/14 04:32 AM
0

Seems like a damn thick line to me. He gets drunk and calls her over. He tries to have sex with her while she passively lays there. He passes out. She has some sort of revelation and leaves. She did not continue to have sex with him when he was passed out (that's rape). She never forced him into doing something when he clearly couldn't consent (also rape).
/r/MensRights04/05/14 03:44 PM
1

Except that she never does anything during the "sex," but lay there and be drunkenly acted upon. It's not like she forced his drunken head (either one) between her legs or climbed on top of him after he was passed out.
/r/MensRights04/05/14 03:41 PM
0

So if I get drunk and try to have sex with a woman, she raped me. What if I get so blind drunk that I lose all sense of inhibition and force myself onto a woman? Does that still count as her raping me?
/r/MensRights04/05/14 03:39 PM
1

Him going down on her and attempting to fuck her while he, himself, is drunk, is her raping him? From what she tells us, she is never the aggressor during the "sex," only laying there on the receiving end of his drunken attempts. Are you saying that, at this point, it is her responsibility to stop him and failure to do so is rape? The whole thing does seem like his fault. He got drunk, he called her, he attempted to have sex with her. The only thing she did was go over there and she couldn't hav…
/r/MensRights04/05/14 03:38 PM
7

Feminism's goals aren't wrong and all rational people should support equal rights, expectations, responsibilities, opportunities. Modern feminism seems to be more about blind hatred (see many of the posts in this subreddit) and blindly following the most vocal members without thinking about what they're saying (see the "I need feminism because..." stuff). Feminism, back when it started, seemed great. Nowadays, it seems to steer followers away from independent thought.
/r/MensRights01/05/14 01:42 AM
1

Well, tumblr feminism isn't really the place for rationality and critical thinking FTFY
/r/MensRights30/04/14 10:26 PM
1

It's just different personal policies, I guess. I only sleep with people I trust.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 03:53 AM
0

Here's my personal policy: don't sleep with someone I think there's a reasonable chance will falsely accuse me of rape. Now I don't have to record anything, unless the woman I'm with also wants to. Also, if you secretly (and almost definitely illegally) record someone and then bring it into court, there's a decent chance it will be inadmissible and will also get you into legal trouble.
/r/MensRights25/04/14 03:35 AM
1

I never said anything about complete celibacy.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 11:39 PM
12

I don't think so, no. Also, if you're having sex with someone and considering secretly recording it in case they falsely accuse you of rape, you probably shouldn't have sex with them.
/r/MensRights24/04/14 11:22 PM
2

To be fair, that's a tiny minority of religious people. Most feminists (at least the vocal ones) are very picky when it comes to who they actually accept.
/r/MensRights02/04/14 04:09 PM
5

Hah, who am I kididng, A man's consent is set in stone FTFY
/r/MensRights01/04/14 08:20 PM
1

While I do use the draft/selective service as evidence that there are downsides to being a man in the U.S., I must admit that it makes sense for only men to be drafted. Most draftees have their lives negatively changed when they're drafted, so the government will typically want to draft as few people as necessary. Because men are, on average, more suited to combat than women, it makes sense to only draft men. For example, if 7 men and 6 women have the same "military worth" as 10 men, then it mak…
/r/MensRights23/03/14 03:24 PM
25

1. I don't need feminism because I understand that perpetrators of sex crimes know what they're doing is wrong and do it anyway. 2. ... it has turned from a movement about equality to a hateful, sexist, and corrupt group that disregards people's issues due to "privilege." 3. ... I am an adult who is capable of taking responsibility for myself and my actions. I define myself and derive my value by my own standards. I don't need to be "empowered." I am not a target for violence and there is no war…
/r/MensRights08/03/14 08:27 PM
13

My senior year of high school, I worked at an after school program at the elementary school I attended when I was younger. It was a generally great experience, especially since a lot of the adult staff had been working there since at least when I was a student there. During most of that year, I typically had a fair amount of facial fair, which added at least a few years to my appearance, depending on how recently I'd trimmed it. I distinctly remember walking on the school's grounds one day after…
/r/MensRights05/03/14 10:58 PM
3

I understand your frustration, but I'm certain your friend would probably physically retaliate if he was being assaulted or raped. Personally, I a woman were to just hit me, for seemingly no reason, I wouldn't do anything apart from try and diffuse the situation. If she continues attacking me, then I would do everything in my power to remove her capacity to hurt me (or others) while doing as little damage to her as necessary (breaking a woman's neck and breaking her arms both stop her from hitti…
/r/MensRights26/02/14 04:47 AM
7

As much as I dislike these kinds of lists, and how many people (men and women) don't realize that these are indeed sexist, I kinda find nothing wrong with the content, apart from the background picture. I think these are virtues/qualities that everyone should strive for.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 02:33 PM
31

No, you don't understand; men can't be raped and women can't rape. Rape by definition is a man raping a woman, regardless of the mental state of the man and woman in question. /s
/r/MensRights16/02/14 03:41 PM
1

I never said that I was guaranteed to be correct, nor that testing shouldn't be done. It's just that, from what I can see, this seems very familiar to a lot of other situations where a negative stereotype affects a person's subconscious and causes them to perform worse than expected.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 08:13 PM
6

Nowhere in the article does it ever blame men for this, and anyone who's studied at least a small amount of psychology can tell what's going on here. Stereotypes can hurt or help one's performance. For example, studies have shown that black students perform worse on standardized tests (like the SATs) if they do the personal ID stuff beforehand, which subconsciously reminds them of the negative stereotypes of blacks and higher education, as opposed to filling out the info sheet afterwards. /u/Spo…
/r/MensRights29/01/14 05:39 AM
2

95 over here. Filled in the exact same answers, but changed my gender to female to see what would happen. Got 20 that time. Something's fishy.
/r/MensRights13/12/13 05:14 AM
1

While I certainly didn't mean to, I sincerely apologize if I came across as saying that circumcision isn't a men's rights issue or to diminish the importance of men's rights issues as a whole. I also want to apologize for accusing you of downvoting me. That was wrong of me and I shouldn't have assumed that of you. The point I was trying to make (kinda poorly, in hindsight) is like the discussions of censorship and freedom of speech. If a government censors a news story, for example, because it w…
/r/MensRights22/11/13 05:11 AM
0

I'm not "complaining that something isn't men's rights when it clearly is;" I'm asking how this article pertains to men's rights because it seemed that the article was about informed people making the decision to get themselves circumcised, which is perfectly reasonable. However, if the informed people are being told lies or (what seems to be the case here) are being given advice on possibly incorrect data, then obviously they aren't very well informed. This seems to be the point you are making,…
/r/MensRights22/11/13 03:41 AM
-1

I never said circumcision wasn't a men's rights issue; I said that an informed person volunteering to get circumcised doesn't seem like one. Also, from what I've read, there seems to be evidence that circumcision decreases the chance of contracting HIV, among sexually active males in under-developed countries. While the effectiveness is certainly contested, as you rightly said, if it does help, then wouldn't it be right to advise men in this situation to get circumcised?
/r/MensRights22/11/13 03:11 AM
-6

Why is this posted in MensRights? I totally understand the debate behind circumcising young boys/babies, but most of the people going to these clinics seem to be at least teenagers, capable of making at least somewhat informed decisions. I'm not being facetious here; I'm honestly confused as to how this is related to men's rights. Anyone mind cluing me in?
/r/MensRights22/11/13 01:29 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter