TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Jonas223XC Archive

View 9 posts and 309 comments by Jonas223XC on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
2

EDIT: Nevermind. After reading the "Adjustment variables" section of OP's link, it looks like the authors took this into account Don't men tend to choose specialty fields more often than women? This is a large part of the wage gap in the medicine field. This observation could also explain this gap. Elaborating: Even if the men and women work in the same hospital, if the women are (on average) general practitioners and the men are (on average) cardiologists or work in the ICU... wouldn't you expe…
/r/MensRights21/12/16 09:38 PM
4

I am willing to pay money to watch this film. How can I see it if there are no showings near me?
/r/MensRights04/11/16 04:52 PM
1

Is there a longer version of this? I would love to watch Lauren interview SJW's
/r/MensRights10/10/16 07:07 PM
14

Hoff Summers is a goddess
/r/MensRights05/10/16 06:32 PM
2

I would be curious to attend an in-person screening of this movie. Where can I find a list as to where it could be showing near me?
/r/MensRights05/10/16 01:49 PM
6

Contrary to what many in the world of identity politics would have you believe, most people don't actually care what gender you prefer. They care about how intelligent, funny, caring, clever, etc you are. I know that mental illness can be really, really hard. My recommendation would be to try to work hard to make yourself into the best person that you know how to be, and the search for WHO that person inside of you is will come easier afterwards.
/r/MensRights30/09/16 07:21 PM
1

Replying to save for later
/r/MensRights08/07/16 03:06 AM
1

why are these people so terrible?
/r/MensRights01/06/16 07:55 PM
1

My only explanation is that these people are just afraid of losing their jobs. They get their job because they are basically academic politicians at that point: they have to represent the school well to outsiders and handle internal matters diplomatically. Their job is to make the school look good, and throwing a quarter of their faculty under the bus for being lunatics is not the way to do it
/r/MensRights26/03/16 04:37 PM
18

The science, math, engineering, medicine, etc programs in these elite universities are still just as prestigious as always. It's really just the humanities programs in general that have been polluted with SJW bullshit
/r/MensRights25/03/16 07:58 PM
9

No, he's not interested because she wasn't around to help with the work, and showing up with her hand out once the hard part is over makes him feel used. You have a good post, but I think you're off a bit at the end. The correct reason he wouldn't go out with her is not because she wasn't there to suffer with the guy as he was in the process of bettering himself. He wouldn't go out with her because she didn't do an equivalent amount of work to better herself
/r/MensRights29/02/16 02:55 AM
1

That data doesn't exist because police are horrible at record keeping of any sort... I think that this is intentional negligence, IMO, and is something that the FBI needs to start to punish police officers for failing to document all violent interactions with all people. In the absence of that specific data, you could normalize it based upon the number of violent crimes commited, like Aggrevated Assault, Robbery, Rape and/or Murder. If everything is working properly, then the ratios at which eac…
/r/MensRights26/01/16 04:14 PM
1

The key figure to look at is to compare the percentage, by race, of police shootings, then run that number against the corresponding racial population percentage. Wrong. Normalizing police violence against population percentage assumes that each population is committing violent acts against the police at the same rate, which is not true. You should be normalizing the "violent crime rate of police against demographic X"" vs "violent crime rate of demographic X against the police" and then compare…
/r/MensRights26/01/16 03:18 PM
1

“It is exactly this kind of victim blaming and shaming that fosters rape culture, re-victimizes those brave enough to have come forward, and silences countless other victims.” Here it is, in plain English from the crazy Feminist's own mouths: Maintaining their narrative is more important than discovering the truth.
/r/MensRights13/01/16 06:16 PM
9

✅💯 You nailed it man
/r/MensRights25/12/15 03:08 AM
1

I fit all 3 criteria. I just don't know how to find women who also meet those 3 criteria...
/r/MensRights21/12/15 06:33 PM
0

Are you also supporting Hope Solo?
/r/MensRights15/12/15 01:43 AM
1

I don't think that Bill Cosby's case is one that the MRM should get behind. There seems to be pretty convincing evidence against him. I would love to hear why you think differently, though, OP
/r/MensRights15/12/15 12:15 AM
3

Those same people are also against giving care to our veterans for their PTSD, or against sensible healthcare laws to make insurance more affordable and accessible to the working class These people think that it's the sick person's fault for getting sick, therefore it's up to them to help themselves. The fact that some of the victims of their view happen come to the detriment of women doesn't mean that those people would act any differently if the laws only affected men. The fact that this "sick…
/r/MensRights06/12/15 11:13 PM
11

Essentially saying how men tell women if they can have abortions or not. Because, if they decide they want one, women can just drive to a fucking abortion clinic like the adults that they are. They don't need a man's permission to have one. I don't understand what you're talking about
/r/MensRights06/12/15 10:40 PM
7

It is men's fault when men have it shitty, and it is men's fault when women have it shitty
/r/MensRights25/11/15 09:05 PM
3

Agreed
/r/MensRights24/11/15 05:40 PM
2

They clearly don't think that that is what actually happened, or they wouldn't have come to that conclusion. I agree with you that this case was a horrendous miscarriage of justice, but that doesn't mean that most self-described feminists support the rape of men.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 04:16 PM
3

Ask any real-life Feminist if they think that women should be able to blackmail men into having sex with them, or forcibly give fellatio to non-consenting men (like what happened to OP). There is a 0% chance that they will say that that is acceptable. Granted, to your point, some of the most extreme Feminists (i.e. bigots) will, incorrectly, not call that behavior what it is: Rape.
/r/MensRights24/11/15 03:11 PM
0

I don't think even most staunch feminists would look at that behavior and say "well it's OK because it happens to a man" Straw-feminists, on the other hand....
/r/MensRights23/11/15 09:44 PM
2

Maybe, but it will cost you a fuckload of lawyer fees regardless of whether you get your convinction overturned. And this guy doesn't appear to be the most well-off
/r/MensRights11/11/15 12:31 AM
1

Being able to figure out how to solve problems that teachers tell you how to solve does not meant that those students are capable of exercising critical thought. source: 3.8 GPA engineering student
/r/MensRights10/11/15 03:28 PM
4

I consider myself a very kind, patient and generally agreeable person. You are in a completely different league of integrity than me. Seriously, you have all of my respect
/r/MensRights16/10/15 08:43 PM
21

Their kids? No, you mean her kids
/r/MensRights16/10/15 08:21 PM
21

His wallet? Also her choice
/r/MensRights16/10/15 08:20 PM
1

Is there an equivalent article about the history surrounding all men fighting for the rights to vote in the US? This article is about the UK
/r/MensRights08/10/15 07:20 PM
3

This is a great article, and I have been mulling around very similar concepts myself for quite a long time. I'm glad that someone articulated them so well.
/r/MensRights02/10/15 08:15 PM
1

/r/FeMRAdebates is the only sub where you can have an actual discussion with actual feminists. The moderation on FEMRADebates is a bit more restrictive than it is on /r/Mensrights, but the quality of the discussion there is much higher as a result. That sub actively promotes critical thinking, instead of this sub which is mostly an echo chamber (Note: /r/MR is an echo chamber that I agree with, yes, but it is still an echo chamber).
/r/MensRights02/10/15 03:18 PM
-1

"Sexual privilege should be stripped of women" Are you fucking insane?
/r/MensRights30/09/15 12:05 PM
11

This is what happens when feminists lie over and over again: idiots believe the lies, and use them to justify their own entitlement. "Women get paid less so you should pay for my existence" It is like these people take pride in being parasites
/r/MensRights28/09/15 02:16 AM
2

Because some unethical things were done by people in the pharmaceutical industry does not mean that the industry itself creates products that are unethical. Do you know anyone who has ever died or even suffered from measles? Mumps? Rubella? Varicella? What about small pox? Tuberculosis? Rotavirus? No? Probably because of the. major advancements in the pharmaceutical industry over the last 100 years.... Yes, I think the reasons that you stated about profiting off of people's health are legitimate…
/r/MensRights25/09/15 03:40 PM
0

"Ineffectual vaccines" is basically a nonsequitor. I will skip right to the ad hominems, actually: you are an idiot. I hope your kid dies from a preventable illness that you could have gotten a vaccine for, but didn't because you think they are ineffective. Maybe then you will realize how dumb you are
/r/MensRights25/09/15 12:23 PM
1

I would be down to stream Starcraft for a few hours for a good cause (I play at a reasonably high level), although that is hardly worth its own stream...
/r/MensRights25/09/15 12:19 PM
1

encourage ALL MEN who have drunk sex to report it as a rape or sexual assault Well, no one would care, because it's men who are suffering...
/r/MensRights24/09/15 05:27 PM
5

Except that, unlike Anita's imagined oppression, Male oppression actually is associated with serious negative life outcomes. I.E...Higher suicide rate, imprisonment rates, homeless rates, lower life expectancy, etc
/r/MensRights24/09/15 12:47 AM
77

How would Oxford succeed in creating thousands of seats in their classrooms for everyone who wanted to go there? The high-prestige universities would be flooded with people... and many of the people that they would currently reject would probably end up do pretty well. To compensate for this massive influx of students, the universities would have to make their courses insanely difficult, so that only the highest percentage of people would pass them and be able to stay in school. Do you know who …
/r/MensRights23/09/15 04:19 PM
1

I saw that this study was published in the "Psychology of Women Quarterly" and stopped reading
/r/MensRights15/09/15 03:03 AM
1

Please sue him. Pretty please?
/r/MensRights04/09/15 06:30 PM
2

Nice post, however.... Under the Pervasive criterion, men are not Sexist, women are. Under the Restrictive criterion, men are not Sexist, women are. Under the Hierarchical criterion, men are no more sexist than women. Under the Power criterion, men are not Sexist, feminists (gender-independent) are. Important distinction: It is the media, legal system, and our own collective internal biases that are sexist, not "only women" or even "only feminists." Society at large is to blame, not one subset o…
/r/MensRights02/09/15 09:21 PM
7

Also, women are around four times times as likely to tear their ACL playing soccer or basketball compared to men
/r/MensRights27/08/15 07:17 PM
43

Except that the "true feminists" don't call the crazies out on their bullshit. Where are the "true feminists" here? What about here? And here? Where are these True Feminists<sup>TM</sup> hiding?
/r/MensRights26/08/15 02:29 AM
18

She really has little else to offer the people that makes her any different or better qualified than other candidates. That's not exactly true; she does have the most political experience in the executive branch out of most any candidate.... and that's exactly why she should not be elected. Career politicians are cancerous. I think that the country would be better off if the US's 435 congressmen were chosen at random every 8 years from qualified working professionals. I would rather see a congre…
/r/MensRights19/08/15 09:26 PM
2

Luckily, facts don't give a shit whether or not you agree with them
/r/MensRights28/07/15 08:48 PM
9

The truth might be triggering to some people, lol
/r/MensRights16/07/15 08:56 PM
6

...lol
/r/MensRights13/07/15 08:21 PM
3

I'm surprised that you didn't get completely fucked over in Alimony payments, to be honest.
/r/MensRights13/07/15 08:20 PM
1

Awesome, thanks for the link
/r/MensRights12/07/15 03:11 PM
8

Circumsized men are also more likely to suffer from erectile dysfunction later in life..... Turns out cutting off a sensitive nerve area of someone's body means that body part doesn't function as well
/r/MensRights12/07/15 01:01 PM
17

"A lie gets halfway around the world before the truth has a chance to get its pants on." ~Winston Churchill
/r/MensRights10/07/15 01:01 AM
8

I see what your getting at with the joke but in this case there is a logical reason. The fact that we recognize this post as a joke means that we recognize that, for every job, there's reasonable and non-sexist reasons that explain the wage gap.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 09:48 PM
-1

Great lets continue to criminalize more victimless crimes. Because that worked so well with marijuana xD
/r/MensRights30/04/15 12:53 AM
-2

Why does a minor always have to be "coerced" into having sexual relationships with someone who is several years older than them? Why can't people accept that that is something the minor could actually want?
/r/MensRights29/04/15 03:52 PM
14

I CAN'T YELL "FIRE" IN A CROWDED THEATER? STOP OPPRESSING MY FREEDOM OF SPEECH, SHITLORD
/r/MensRights26/04/15 08:52 PM
22

For these people it doesn't matter whether or not an event actually happened. The truth means nothing. These people only care about preserving the narrative that they believe in. So why they can't prove this particular incident (because it didn't happen), this lie is based upon something that could happen all of the time.... therefore we should take action to prevent that thing from happening more. The same kind of bullshit happened with that "Jackie" UVA rape story.... some people still believe…
/r/MensRights16/04/15 06:30 PM
3

The system doesn't work, and it is destined to stay that way for forever. See: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s7tWHJfhiyo
/r/MensRights10/04/15 08:48 PM
3

Nobody gives a shit about men. I'm not voting until I have a meaningful choice
/r/MensRights10/04/15 07:59 PM
1

I agree for the most part
/r/MensRights08/04/15 11:32 PM
1

I could, but that wouldn't really mean anything because I would be LOOKING FOR A STUDY THAT SUPPORTS WHAT I BELIEVE. therefore proving my point
/r/MensRights08/04/15 11:08 PM
3

You can design studies to find sexism or not find sexism depending upon what you define sexism to be. The conclusion that these studies find says more about what the researchers (and the people who fund them) believe than it does about any objective truth.
/r/MensRights08/04/15 08:43 PM
3

...which is where they already are. But that isn't good enough, they need the higher-paid jobs!
/r/MensRights14/03/15 10:44 PM
75

Ah, the old "separate but equal" clause xD
/r/MensRights10/02/15 02:40 AM
2

Honestly, the law should be 1) a quarter of the difference between the salary of the average child-care worker and the after-tax income difference of the parties who needs to pay child support. So if the person being paid child support makes $30,000 a year after taxes, and the person paying it makes $70,000 after taxes, the child support should, at max, be a quarter of that difference per year... i.e. $10,000 or 2) salary of the average child-care worker whichever is less. Because the person pay…
/r/MensRights02/02/15 01:00 PM
13

And morally bankrupt politicians/corporations giving women handouts for what men have to earn
/r/MensRights23/01/15 02:43 PM
1

Jesus fucking christ....
/r/MensRights23/01/15 12:03 PM
9

A college senior with crippling debt from going to an Ivy league school versus a multi-millionaire senator with poltical connections? That would be a close trial for sure. If anything he should sue the university (odds are not much better) or, better yet, the student who defamed him.
/r/MensRights23/01/15 03:13 AM
9

It is great advice regardless of the genders of the parties involved, but I would be willing to bet $20 that, if the person who she had sex with were a man and she expressed the same feelings of uncertainty, that the most upvoted advice would be wildly different
/r/MensRights01/01/15 11:46 PM
0

Because she represents everything that is wrong with modern Feminism.
/r/MensRights21/10/14 02:03 AM
4

Anyone who plays any competitive videogame gets death threats all of the time. I play SC2, why can't I get my Zerg and Terran enemies arrested? wahhh :(
/r/MensRights16/10/14 03:06 AM
0

Has there been a precedent set for fines of that magnitude for similar crimes? If, after talking to her lawyer about confessing, that lawyer told her that she should could owe in the order of several million dollars should she go through with it, then I doubt that she (or other individuals in her position) would, given the opportunity, repeat her decision knowing what she knows now.
/r/MensRights05/10/14 11:59 PM
-26

While I agree with you in theory, in practice as soon as the legal system sets a precedent for "admitting that you fabricated a rape claim" -> "go to jail" then nobody would ever admit that they made up a rape claim. Why would they if they knew that they would go to jail for it? If you value the freedom of the innocent more than you value the imprisonment of the guilty (which is what the legal system is theoretically designed to do), then the current system, while still shitty, is better than th…
/r/MensRights05/10/14 10:48 PM
30

So it is safe to assume that his SO is going to jail now? Photographic evidence of extreme and repeated violence sends people to jail, right? Or should this be x-posted to /r/PussyPass?
/r/MensRights08/08/14 02:27 PM
4

That doesn't make it a thing worth imitating
/r/MensRights08/08/14 10:57 AM
5

This is what I like about MRM and this subreddit in particular. We call out the bullshit where we see it, even if the conclusions that come as a result of that bullshit would add evidence to an agenda or an idea that we support
/r/MensRights22/07/14 10:50 PM
2

That woman is hilarious. Nice video, and I agree with her 100%. Also: ...is that Boxxy? Or just her Doppelganger? hahaha
/r/MensRights22/07/14 05:15 PM
6

Fantastic list, thanks for the link.
/r/MensRights17/07/14 06:36 PM
1

Downvoted for being the most obvious troll in history. Go back to the AgainstMensRights subreddit where you belong
/r/MensRights17/07/14 06:05 PM
1

I actually agree with that
/r/MensRights07/06/14 03:37 PM
2

Good post, and a very good list. You might want to add something about Male college students being kicked out of school based solely on the word of a woman in complete violation of their right to due process.
/r/MensRights04/06/14 06:11 PM
5

The more places that MRA's have a voice means the more places that feminism is shown for what it really is. So it's in Feminists' best interest to silence us, since they are largely incapable in debating against us.
/r/MensRights30/05/14 12:26 AM
3

I think that it was Tywin, no?
/r/MensRights29/05/14 11:46 PM
5

Even if you present these people with facts that contradict their claims, the vast majority of people will never change their view or admit that they are wrong.
/r/MensRights27/05/14 05:25 AM
22

You don't understand. It doesn't matter whether massive amounts of internet trolls are actually harassing them online. What matters is that they FEEL like there are people that are trying to suppress their world view, and it is somehow the job of everybody else to work towards correcting those feelings, no matter how irrational or unfounded they might be.
/r/MensRights24/05/14 06:42 PM
9

The answer is maybe, but it will be a long, difficult, and EXPENSIVE process to get it reduced. That's really how fucked the system is. The person who is paying spousal support has to prove why they cannot pay as much as they are supposed to be paying. The fact that the person who they are paying money towards does not need that money at all has almost nothing to do with how much money is being paid. It's the most insanely broken system imaginable, but because that system disproportionately nega…
/r/MensRights24/05/14 06:14 PM
4

What disease are you suffering from? Can you tell me a bit more about your life? Your experiences? What attracts you to the MHRM?
/r/MensRights14/05/14 03:35 AM
7

That is probably the best way of doing it. But he should not be responsible for any back child support if he chooses to say "yes." Like if the mother approaches the father when their child is age 4 and asks if he wants to be a legal parent, if he says yes he shouldn't have to pay 4 years of back child support.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 08:26 PM
10

No more than having fire departments encourages people to burn down their homes.
/r/MensRights08/05/14 07:30 PM
7

LPS should be opt in. That way, when pregnant, women HAVE TO notify the man that she is pregnant in order for him to agree to be the parent. If it were opt out, then the woman could just not tell the guy that she is pregnant with his kid, and he would never know that he had the opportunity to opt out to begin with. In fact, with the opt out system, it is in the woman's best interest to NOT tell the father that she is pregnant, because giving him that knowledge would give him the opportunity to a…
/r/MensRights08/05/14 07:02 PM
2

I feel like nobody called you out on this point so I'm going to take the liberty and do it myself Money is political power in modern society. If one demographic has a disproportionate ability to influence society than another, then that is a genuine problem. Wrong. Having money is not power, spending money is. And despite making "77 cents for every dollar" a man makes, women still make up ~70% of consumer spending. But you are correct: that a person having money gives them more spending power. B…
/r/MensRights29/04/14 02:30 AM
10

If you want to have an actual discussion as to why MRA's do not think that Patriarchy Theory represents reality very well, make a thread asking about it. Provide examples of where you think that the Patriarchy is hurting men and/or women, and people will usually respond. This subreddit can be a good place for a discussion, but replying "oh that issue that you're refering to? that is the PatriarchyTM " is not the way to do it. A better place for discussion that many MRA's and Feminists read is /r…
/r/MensRights27/04/14 10:48 PM
21

Feminism: Equal rights MRA's: Equal rights, equal responsibility, equal consequences.
/r/MensRights27/04/14 10:44 PM
5

Although there has already been some good replies in this thread, I think that you can conduct a quick experiment to answer this question yourself. Go ahead and post the same question but in reverse to /r/feminism titled "Is Feminism like the Men's Rights Activists claim it is?" with a similar two sentence summary saying the opposite: that you have been reading A Voice for Men and are wondering if feminism is how they claim that it is. I highly doubt that making that thread in /r/feminism will g…
/r/MensRights25/04/14 11:30 PM
2

lol this exchange was adorable. I'm an engineer as well, and I am cripplingly uncreative and inartistic. I am jealous of the few people that are good at both Math/Engineering and the Arts :(
/r/MensRights14/04/14 02:51 PM
-13

Just because it was planned does not mean that there would not have been outrage had the reverse happened: a man ripping off a woman's shirt.
/r/MensRights14/04/14 02:36 PM
11

He means that it is not a matter of gender discrimination
/r/MensRights10/04/14 09:30 PM
28

If programming is valuable as a skill in and of itself, why is it less important for a man to learn that skill over a woman? I really don't fucking get it.....
/r/MensRights10/04/14 02:34 PM
2

.....Even in a medically necessary situation like a foreskin that is fused at the tip, that STILL doesn't make it necessary to remove the foreskin altogether a la circumcision.
/r/MensRights09/04/14 09:41 PM
1

As someone who is going to be publishing his thesis in a few months (which needs to be peer reviewed), I can confirm that I have no idea what I am doing still
/r/MensRights09/04/14 01:13 AM
6

That is how I discovered this subreddit 2+ years ago. And I'm still here :D
/r/MensRights08/04/14 03:43 AM
1

and ~10% is the amount of rape charges that result in conviction (including false positives, which are horrible in and of themselves). If the ratio of verifiably false rape charges to those where the evidence results in a conviction is close to 1 to 1, then wouldn't that suggest that close to half of all rape claims that result in a definitive conclusion are false?
/r/MensRights07/04/14 05:51 PM
1

the 2-8% statistic is actually just made up, as is any number that claims to quantify how many rapes are unreported. If they are "unreported" then how do you know about them at all? Read a thread about it here: http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1o74n7/facts_and_statistics_about_false_rape_claims_a/
/r/MensRights07/04/14 02:32 AM
0

Not at all related to what you have written(which I agree with 100%), but you should head over to /r/FeMRADebates It's like a less circle-jerky version of this subreddit, where feminists, SRSers, and ARMers all join in on the gendered debate. It makes for some interesting back and forth conversations, although you have to be a bit more careful about negatively generalizing feminism or feminists because the moderation is understandably a bit more strict over there.
/r/MensRights03/04/14 09:16 PM
3

Wow. This might be the best summary I have ever seen of the MRM vs Feminism. Incredibly done...
/r/MensRights03/04/14 09:06 PM
19

Not at all surprising
/r/MensRights01/04/14 07:04 PM
3

Wow. That is a really telling story. You should make that story it's own thread so that more people will see it.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 11:59 PM
2

I think that men and women tend to resort to violence for very different reasons. Women tend to be more prone to use weapons when they get violent because they are actively TRYING to inflict the most damage to their significant other's health. Whereas men, when they do get violent and hurt their significant other, tend to do so as a method of "blowing off steam" (i.e. venting their frustrations with that person), but not to actively cause long-term physical damage. The claim that women use weapo…
/r/MensRights31/03/14 07:32 PM
7

...okay THAT makes a lot more sense. But yeah I'm still curious to see the study, if you get a chance <3
/r/MensRights31/03/14 03:41 PM
23

Yeah, I was going to point that out as well. The statistic should say "Of men who are attacked by their female Significant Other, 63% of the time is with a deadly weapon." Although to be honest even that statistic seems VERY high to me, so I am going to have to ask for a source on that one. It is probably also worthwhile to mention that primary aggressor policies in the VAWA mean that men are often arrested when they call the police on their SO.
/r/MensRights31/03/14 03:13 PM
4

I'm not giving them page views for this trash article. Does anyone care to take a screenshot or copy/paste it here?
/r/MensRights29/03/14 10:05 PM
1

That mistake was adorable.... bahahaha <3
/r/MensRights25/03/14 04:31 AM
1

That is fucking outrageous. Next did they gather up all of the black students and tell them not to steal? And teach the white kids strategies to avoid losing their possessions?
/r/MensRights24/03/14 03:38 AM
1

Here is a good place to start. The first main talking point of that post has to do with feminists fighting against default shared custody laws. You should also look up some of the research about kids that grow up in fatherless homes.
/r/MensRights23/03/14 04:39 AM
2

If having a man near you is preventing you from learning, then you have serious psychological dysfunction that needs to be immediately addressed. Like... if I am not comfortable having black people in my class at school, then the way of solving that issue is not to exclude the black people from being in my class. The way to solve it is to try and deconstruct why I am having feelings like that and see if, through repeated experience, we can work on mending that irrational phobia.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 01:38 PM
1

It's not about me getting in personally, it is about neither sex getting excluded in the first place.
/r/MensRights22/03/14 04:30 AM
5

It says "for women only" right in the email, which is pretty clearly a title IX violation IMO
/r/MensRights22/03/14 01:30 AM
3

I'm going to talk to the Ombudsman on Monday and see what he suggests I do.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 11:53 PM
11

Title IX says that that doesn't matter.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 10:21 PM
7

If my University offered a self-defense class specifically for men as well as one for women, I would not mind at all because yeah.... men and women should defend themselves differently. But there isn't one, and that is sexist.
/r/MensRights21/03/14 09:53 PM
5

It's happening in a lot of different schools. Mine is not in Minnesota
/r/MensRights21/03/14 06:43 PM
81

I'm pretty upset, to be honest. I really would like to have some basic self-defense training, because you never really know when you would need it. But putting any selfish motivations aside for a second: this is just disgusting to me. Can you imagine if there was a self-defense course where only the white students were allowed to sign up?
/r/MensRights21/03/14 04:38 PM
2

Nope, it is just a link that I wanted to have handy. Thanks, friend
/r/MensRights13/03/14 05:14 AM
1

Yesss! Thank you! <3
/r/MensRights13/03/14 05:05 AM
0

Thanks, RightsBot! <3
/r/MensRights13/03/14 03:31 AM
1

So you wouldn't have an issue with people installing cameras on staircases pointing up at people's crotches with the sole purpose of getting upskirt photos of girls for random dudes to goggle over? I think that women should be able to dress under the assumption that whatever they wear under their skirt or dress shouldn't be paraded to the world if they don't want it to be. People are free to do whatever they want until they start to exploit or take advantage of others. I think that this is quite…
/r/MensRights06/03/14 11:51 PM
3

Because making 4 wrongs instead of 3 wrongs will make everything better? I don't understand your argument. Everything we buy is tracked in order to give the companies that do it information to better provide to us, their customers, a better experience. Security footage is just to make sure that nobody is stealing anything or help identify security threats to keep their customers safe. The vast majority of internet monitoring is done to give us targeted advertising, which is beneficial for both p…
/r/MensRights06/03/14 01:26 PM
10

I think that women should be able to go out in public without fear of having their privacy violated, and I agree that violating this fundamental right to privacy should be protecting undert he law.
/r/MensRights06/03/14 12:19 PM
1

That's sounds like growing up as a man :/ you're welcome to stick around and, if you feel like you belong here, you are more than welcome to stay.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 10:48 PM
2

make a new account to post in /r/TRP then, I dunno what to tell you dude.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 07:13 AM
4

What exactly are you looking for? Generally this subreddit is a place where people talk about or post stories relating to ways in which we feel men are being treated unfairly or being discriminated against for no other reason than the fact that they are male. It doesn't sound like your story has very much to do with that, unfortunately. It sounds to me like you are looking for people to give you advice about exploring your own sexuality, and I think that /r/lgbt might be better for that. Perhaps…
/r/MensRights18/02/14 06:10 AM
3

I want to see this question answered as well, honestly.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 05:27 PM
4

Extremely well done, dude. This post should be put on the sidebar for sure.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 05:25 AM
4

m'lady!
/r/MensRights30/01/14 04:19 PM
21

As someone who was born into a stable, loving, and financially pretty well-off family: it absolutely is
/r/MensRights30/01/14 05:13 AM
1

It sounds terrible to say, especially as a woman, but I really hope that she "grows out of" her radical feminism. It shouldn't sound terrible for you to say. Feminism is an ideology that is some hybrid between a religion and a very misguided (at least in practice) theory. In either case, not approving of feminism in no way makes you a terrible person. In fact, recognizing a destructive mindset that is hurting one of your friends and confronting them about it makes you a very good person.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 03:43 AM
1

You're not wrong
/r/MensRights28/01/14 02:38 AM
3

That's the worst thing about this culture of victimhood. It is, of course, horrible for the people that get wrongly accused of sexual assault when there realistically was not any crime that took place as a result of this mentality. But what a lot of people here on /r/MR forget is just how miserable and paranoid these people must be. Just for some examples: Staying in on a friday night because you might get mugged if you go out to a party with your friends. Misconstruing sloppy yet enjoyable drun…
/r/MensRights28/01/14 12:10 AM
2

You're correct, but that does not detract from his point.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 03:40 AM
2

marry me? :P
/r/MensRights16/01/14 05:19 AM
-1

I've heard some people use that word not to mean a woman that has a lot of sex, but to mean a woman that gets what she wants by using sex. So (using that defintion which I don't personally agree with) a single, college woman who hooks up with a lot of guys would not be a slut, but a woman who tries to seduce her boss at work to get ahead would be.
/r/MensRights15/01/14 01:42 AM
2

Wow, that is an amazing article. Thanks for the link.
/r/MensRights14/01/14 04:21 AM
9

The strength of the conclusions that you can draw using the scientific method is directly proportional to the strength of your assumptions. When you enter this "research" process with the preconceived notion that women have it worse off than men (which every feminist "researcher" does), you tend to design studies so that they have an outcome which favors that ideology. For examples of this as well as for a rational and unbaised view on feminist "research" on domestic violence, please read to the…
/r/MensRights10/01/14 07:47 AM
22

To answer your question: Around 1 in 5 of our subscribers are not heterosexual. http://www.reddit.com/r/MensRights/comments/1gp2u6/
/r/MensRights04/01/14 02:00 AM
2

The reason is because football and men's basketball cost so much more money for the university to operate. But, on the other side of the coin which title IX conveniently ignores, these sports also generate much more money for the average university than any other sports do. NCAA Division I men's program accounted for $22.2 million in revenue, while the women's median is $865,000 in the 2007-08 academic year. Of the men's revenue, football and men's basketball account for $19.6 million. For the w…
/r/MensRights16/12/13 02:37 AM
3

Neither should happen in either field. Universities should be putting funding in program in a manner that is proportional to the amount of interest in those programs. Determining who gets funding based upon the genitalia of whoever happens to be receiving said funding is sexist and discriminatory by definition.
/r/MensRights15/12/13 10:00 PM
8

Because men show more interest in playing sports, in general. It's that simple Can you imagine if universities started to mandate that spending in Engineering and Mathematics must be equal between men and women? Women would get $5 in funding for every $1 a man would get. Is that what you would call equality? This sounds really scary because it is... but it is not far-fetched at all that this happens in the next 10 years (see: http://www.nwlc.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/nwlcstem_titleixfactsheet…
/r/MensRights15/12/13 05:37 PM
1

That was what I immediately thought of. Of course she thinks that the gender that she identifies more closely with is preferable to the one that she does not identify with. Just look at the last 2 minutes of the video.
/r/MensRights12/12/13 12:50 AM
28

Feminism in a Nutshell: “The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum....” ― Noam Chomsky
/r/MensRights10/12/13 03:37 AM
7

tl;dw: all men are rapists
/r/MensRights06/12/13 01:20 AM
19

That would be a factor as to why white men find them attractive as well as why white women would be jealous and contemptuous of competition. So your answer is yes.
/r/MensRights06/12/13 01:15 AM
25

Nice work, dude. Saved
/r/MensRights05/12/13 08:24 PM
7

That video will likely get taken down from Youtube because feminism. can someone make a mirror? This is important to show
/r/MensRights04/12/13 06:38 AM
2

Yes, thank you for correcting that typo. My bad
/r/MensRights02/12/13 04:13 AM
2

Can't a lawyer get arrested and charged with miscarriage of justice if they are believed to have intentionally withheld critical information in one of their cases? This person CREATED fake "evidence" out of thin air to fit their ideological beliefs, this should be at least a year in prison for EACH case that they tampered with....
/r/MensRights02/12/13 01:31 AM
17

Probably /r/srs white knight douchebags. Nothing new to see here, either :P
/r/MensRights01/12/13 11:45 PM
30

Feminists hate it when their ideology is questioned. Nothing new to see here. It's the same reason the very religious think that Atheists are destroying society: because (both Atheists are MRA's) are using logic and a level-head to deconstruct an argument based upon feelings, distorted facts and a manipulation of language.
/r/MensRights01/12/13 09:28 PM
5

Also, you need to film her breathing into a breathalyzer as well as a taking a blood test to prove that she was not under the influence of any drugs or alcohol while she made the decision to consent to the act
/r/MensRights30/11/13 02:56 AM
3

To play devil's advocate: If you multiply the "1 in 125 women" are raped per year (which they only got bit a blatant abuse of statistics in the first place) by the ~35 or so years of her life that a woman has a high likelihood of being raped (lets say, between the age of 10 years old to 45 years old) you would get something close to the 1 in 4 statistic that they commonly cite. Although using more realistic statistics of the study of 3 large universities that shows a 1 in 1877 chance for a woman…
/r/MensRights27/11/13 07:31 PM
6

Nobody is tearing anybody down to any level. We are all on the same level to begin with. That is the point
/r/MensRights27/11/13 07:25 AM
6

Society seems to have this idea that women are somehow on a higher moral standing than men (as shown by sentencing disparity, child custody disparity, etc). These posts help to show that women can be every bit as much of an asshole or as much of a manipulative liar as a man. Realizing that people can be shit to each other and punishing everyone equally for that shitty behavior is a pretty big part of what /r/mensrights stands for.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 06:47 AM
1

One of the Psychologists who made giant leaps in the research surrounding ADHD admitted that the disease is way over-diagnosed on his deathbed. So, while not a hoax, the vast majority of cases are probably not a "real" disorder.
/r/MensRights27/11/13 06:36 AM
3

When they are so emotionally invested in these issues, then they are by definition incapable of thinking rationally about them.
/r/MensRights16/11/13 02:47 AM
3

I have not been in your position, thankfully, so I have no advice to offer, unfortunately. But, god, reading stories like this is the most depressing fucking thing in the world. A fully competent, eager parent gets their kids and a large chunk of their income taken away and given to some fucking deatbeat, parasite of a human being who proceeds to brainwash their kids into thinking that the responsible, mature adult is the bad guy. It's not only devastating to the OP, but also devastating to the …
/r/MensRights07/11/13 12:52 AM
11

Very nicely done, I like her plain and straightforward writing style that just lays down the truth like is.
/r/MensRights06/11/13 12:33 AM
10

Groundbreaking feminist thinking, right there.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 07:37 PM
21

Which is interesting, because the gay and lesbian community both have a ton to gain from the MRM.
/r/MensRights05/11/13 06:02 PM
2

You should read this! Takes only 4 minutes or so, and explains really well why, if you truly believe in equal rights AND equal responsibilities for both genders, that you cannot in good conscience call yourself a feminist. http://www.mensrights.ca/feminism-and-antifeminism/
/r/MensRights04/11/13 03:30 AM
3

I cannot upvote you enough, man. I thought that this subreddit was better than posts like the OP. Now we're trying to hide the truth because it might offend some people. Unfortunate :/
/r/MensRights03/11/13 11:47 PM
4

heh, great typo indeed.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 07:46 PM
20

The page said "women don't build" not "women can't build" I am a male and I am a Mechanical Engineer, and there are women in my major as an undergrad and again in graduate school that are every bit as competent as the male students. But the fact of the matter is that the vast majority of construction workers, architects and engineers are men. It's like saying that the vast majority of teachers are women, which is undeniably true. And there is nothing sexiest about pointing that out.
/r/MensRights03/11/13 04:29 PM
2

I'm not going to act like I am a perfect person, and I am always looking to grow as a human being, but when I disagree with anything that they say, or ask them to clarify something because it does not make sense to me, and those attempts at clear and honest communication are immediately construed to be an insult to their character, I don't really see what exactly I am supposed to learn.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 06:49 PM
1

Not for males, for the male condition. Like the human condition, but for men.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 05:03 PM
4

I have tried doing this over multiple relationships with what I believed were intelligent, beautiful and sensible women, and the only thing that I have received at the end of it all is loneliness and a growing disdain for the human (male) condition.
/r/MensRights25/10/13 04:54 PM
1

http://news.menshealth.com/is-your-circumcision-making-you-soft/ Not exactly what you are looking for, but: Circumcised men are 4.5 times more likely to suffer from Erectile Dysfunction. Who'd have thought that cutting off part of his penis would result in him having trouble getting it up?
/r/MensRights24/10/13 10:11 PM
1

In other news: having a lot of money provides people with advantages that poor people are not afforded (pun intended).
/r/MensRights20/10/13 01:07 AM
2

Rational people are few and far between, that's the big issue here
/r/MensRights17/10/13 10:35 PM
26

We all know
/r/MensRights17/10/13 02:43 AM
2

^ that
/r/MensRights15/10/13 01:58 AM
5

Alternatively, you can visit /r/fsm for more discussion on concepts that are not real.
/r/MensRights02/10/13 11:30 PM
24

You are assuming that men in power have a strong bias in favor of other men, and that is verifiably false from both a psychological basis (Men show almost zero in-group bias towards other men) and a legislative basis. Legislative Disparities: Example 1: there is a VAWA, but no violence against men act despite the fact that a) every reputable study that asks women and men the same questions finds that (in general) domestic violence and sexual assaults are approximately equally committed by both s…
/r/MensRights01/10/13 09:36 PM
28

...Wow. Depressing shit
/r/MensRights25/09/13 11:13 PM
4

How Domestic Violence surveys and reports consciously alter statistics to fit the "women are raped, men do the raping" narrative: http://www.genderratic.com/p/836/
/r/MensRights24/09/13 07:22 PM
11

I'm fairly certain that 99.9% of people do not think this way, but I think that these posts do a fairly good job of showing how insane the "don't be that guy" posters actually are.
/r/MensRights24/09/13 04:55 AM
5

I absolutely would choose it.
/r/MensRights23/09/13 11:46 PM
1

Where I enter my credit card information, there is a drop down menu as part of listing the billing address that only lists canadian providences :(
/r/MensRights20/09/13 10:53 PM
6

It won't let me select a billing address that is inside the United States. It makes me list a Canadian Providence as a billing address, and being from the USA means that I can't donate, I suppose? Good luck getting the money you need, CAFE. I would pitch $20 your way, but I apparently can't :(
/r/MensRights20/09/13 07:27 PM
2

Yep :/
/r/MensRights20/09/13 01:38 PM
11

As per the image in the Original post: Women already have the ability to abandon their child at any hospital and the state will pick up the slack for them. Why should men not get the same option?
/r/MensRights19/09/13 06:54 PM
12

If it is a right for every child to get food, a roof over their head, medicine, etc then the government should be subsidizing those choices for women. Oh wait, they already do. Women should not have the power to turn good men into cash cows for 18 years because of one mistake. It's that simple
/r/MensRights19/09/13 06:47 PM
16

You are missing the point entirely. Yes, it is and should be only the woman's choice whether or not to have a child. It is her body, nobody should be able to force her to go through pregnancy and childbirth if she does not want to. However, because the choice to have a child ultimately unilaterally made by women, then the responsibility of that decision should also be hers. Naturally, if a guy chooses to help that woman raise that child, he should legally be entitled to do so. Her body, her choi…
/r/MensRights19/09/13 06:28 PM
31

Afraid of being on the hook for 18 years? Don't be cuming into women. There's a simple choice for ya. Under the lopsided legal system that we have now, yeah that's basically what is in every man's best interest, unfortunately. But from a legal standpoint, this argument makes zero sense. We moved past the "if you don't want the responsibility of raising kids, then don't have sex" argument for women in 1973 in Roe v Wade, why is this still the argument made for men? Completely bullshit
/r/MensRights19/09/13 05:22 PM
318

Women have reproductive rights, men have reproductive responsibilities.
/r/MensRights19/09/13 04:29 PM
129

At least from my experience, women hate it when you take them off of their pedestals...
/r/MensRights18/09/13 03:38 PM
8

It depends upon what that money would get us, obviously. But tentatively yes
/r/MensRights17/09/13 12:38 PM
19

Please use paragraphs, nobody is going to read that otherwise....
/r/MensRights11/09/13 03:34 AM
2

100 men would need to die at once....
/r/MensRights03/09/13 06:19 PM
8

You might be ready, but if she is not ready then it is and should be only her choice whether or not to bring the baby to term.
/r/MensRights31/08/13 12:46 AM
1

Even if you can prove that MOST women will not try to take everything that they are legally entitled to in a divorce (which is a big assumption that you need to provide evidence to back up), what is the bigger issue that /r/mensrights is concerned with is just how MUCH the law is giving them when they want as much as they can get.
/r/MensRights21/08/13 01:14 AM
1

It's also several orders of magnitude off about the frequency at which rape actually occurs....
/r/MensRights20/08/13 02:03 AM
18

Many feminists legitimately believe that how the female body is portrayed in advertisements and in the media is actually a way for the "patriarchy" to keep women feeling ashamed of their own bodies. They honestly think that it's a real, legitimate violation of their rights. This post just goes to show how ludicrous that line of thinking actually is. If you look at most of the posts that get over 30 upvotes in /r/mensrights , the vast majority of posts are a discussion or an observation that is p…
/r/MensRights13/08/13 06:18 PM
14

What you are angry at is not women, but post-modern discourse.
/r/MensRights21/07/13 10:48 PM
4

Labeling someone a misogynist is a personal attack and a thought-terminating cliche which feminists use to weasel their way out of actually addressing the issue which the discussion is about. So it is all three of those things
/r/MensRights18/07/13 07:50 PM
7

Science is just applied rational thought combined with testing/empirical methods. So yes, he is letting science decide what is actually correct instead of letting his own personal biases get in the way of finding the truth.
/r/MensRights08/07/13 02:24 AM
-18

That's just one person being a sexist asshole, that is not what Men's Rights is about.....
/r/MensRights30/06/13 04:35 AM
1

Say that it's like buying life insurance. Like, while OP doesn't plan on dying anytime soon, it is still a good thing to prepare for the what-if's in life. The pre-nup is the same thing
/r/MensRights10/06/13 01:54 AM
1

Be sure to make it clear that, while you have no doubts at the moment about the success of your relationship, that you don't know what you will think or what you will want 5 or 10 or 20 years down the road. It's a security measure for you. If she truly loves and cares about you she would understand this.
/r/MensRights09/06/13 04:49 PM
1

Doesn't that make it morally justified, given that any of the other options leave him in financial slavery for 18 years?
/r/MensRights17/05/13 12:04 AM
2

Yep. When a slave can decide that they do not want to be a slave anymore and can legally take half (or more) of their slave owner's possessions and income, you can't really call that slavery.
/r/MensRights29/04/13 09:43 PM
26

<3 GirlWritesWhat I know that credible sources in this area are quite difficult to come by because very few researchers are willing to publish data that goes against the Feminazi regime, but do you have sources for many of the statistics that you cited? I believe the numbers that you cited are true or close to it, but there are some who might be skeptical of some of them
/r/MensRights29/04/13 05:43 AM
2

Yeah, that means that there are 39 times the number of men are in prison than women. I don't see why it wouldn't work that way
/r/MensRights13/04/13 02:32 PM
11

People need to learn statistics. 43% of college degrees being awarded to men means that 57% are awarded to females. This means that for every 100 men there are 100*57/43 = 132.55 females recieving degrees. This means that women get 32.5% more degrees than men get. This is a 32% gap.
/r/MensRights12/04/13 11:40 PM
2

Holy Shit. After googling homeless shelters in my area Like at least ~80% of them only accept women and children. Are you kidding me? Men make up over 80% of the homeless, but most homeless shelters only accept women and children?
/r/MensRights07/04/13 05:42 PM
1

I only see bad sides to both coins
/r/MensRights03/04/13 02:14 PM
7

I'm sorry that some people are down voting you for asking for sources and evidence to back up our arguments. Thank you for asking questions and looking to explore both sides of the debate. Many feminists just see those of us in the MRM as bigots when, at least for the vast majority of us, that could not be further from the truth. If you have any questions for me you're welcome to ask away and I will do my best to answer them, although my personal views in no way represent the MRM as a whole.
/r/MensRights30/03/13 05:18 PM
1

Putting this bluntly: If you think that how your gender is portrayed in VIDEO GAMES is a serious problem, you have an extremely warped outlook on how the world works and I don't really respect your opinion on such matters anymore.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 02:21 PM
2

Those kinds of stories just appeal to human nature. That's why people keep making games with these themes, because people LIKE them and will spend their money on them. That's all. It has been an effective trope since Beowolf and Shakesphere and the Iliad and Odyssey. Something about the story just appeals to human nature. And that apparently makes feminists really upset.
/r/MensRights19/03/13 05:04 AM
19

It is showing how demented the "tell <group X> to prevent <activity Y>" logic is. That is all.
/r/MensRights17/03/13 11:10 PM
3

It's odd how Feminists use the term "man up" to tell men to stop them from raping women, but those same Feminists believe that it is an inseparable part of masculine nature to rape.
/r/MensRights14/03/13 09:40 PM
1

What is the name of said feminist?
/r/MensRights14/03/13 08:39 PM
1

Being able to interview well is more important than GPA. You could have a 3.7 with an engineering degree, but if the interviewer thinks that you're an awkward, fidgety kid he will in all likelihood not even ask for a followup interview.
/r/MensRights13/03/13 05:21 PM
2

It is apparently acceptable for men to pay more for the same car insurance coverage as women, because statistically men are more of a risk to cover than women. I see no reason why the reverse should not be true of women for health insurance.
/r/MensRights23/02/13 05:44 PM
4

<3 Girlwriteswhat
/r/MensRights19/02/13 03:34 PM
3

The issues that you brought up, like how society objectifies both men and women and judges people based on their promiscuity are not issues that either the Men's Rights movement or a Women's Rights movement or ANY rights movement should be concerned about. See the thing about those things are is that they can be fixed by a) picking less shallow friends that like being around you no matter who they think that you slept with and b) not giving a shit about how society thinks that you should look. A…
/r/MensRights18/02/13 10:47 PM
11

It would certainly help me have less sympathy on so many inner city mothers that have a bunch of children that they cannot afford.
/r/MensRights31/01/13 05:43 AM
-9

He raises really good points, of course, and I thought it was hilarious. But he could do without the "whore/slut" name calling stuff, some people get offended by that shit.
/r/MensRights14/01/13 05:24 AM
3

People getting offended over basically any joke (that does not directly target them by name) is pretty ridiculous, IMO.
/r/MensRights12/01/13 09:59 PM
3

????
/r/MensRights12/01/13 08:56 PM
4

Did anyone read "The radical feminist paradigm" section? Holy shit, this section alone in the study nullifies every domestic-violence related argument that feminism ever had with facts and logic.... It's beautiful
/r/MensRights02/01/13 07:02 AM
31

Being one of the few people who see through the bullshit is a very exhausting and frustrating process, indeed. Hopefully you find happiness with where ever you donate your intellectual energy next
/r/MensRights24/12/12 07:17 AM
2

It's shit like this that lead me to the simple yet horrifying realization that can be summarized in one sentence: feminists don't think that women are adults.
/r/MensRights23/12/12 07:27 AM
7

I am on neither on the left side or the right, because neither of those parties are on my side
/r/MensRights22/12/12 12:25 AM
20

This is like an attempted murderer getting getting a lighter sentence because they tried to kill their victim with a 9 mm instead of a .357 magnum. Makes zero sense.
/r/MensRights20/12/12 06:45 AM
3

Well, men are the disposable sex, so everything is as it should be [/s]
/r/MensRights20/12/12 06:36 AM
2

That'd be why I won't date a liberal arts major. Lol
/r/MensRights20/12/12 04:50 AM
2

I browse my university's subreddit, so if you're that curious you can find out. I'm also an engineer, and most of my female friends are also engineers. So perhaps being around guys all of the time has made them think like a guy [half sarcastic hypothesis/]
/r/MensRights20/12/12 03:41 AM
7

Most of the women that I have met at college and brought up feminism with have been rather indifferent towards it or outright against it. To say that "most women are like that" suggests that you haven't met too many women, at least to me.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 03:27 PM
34

Rather unfortunate that the article seems to paint all women like this, but it does criticize the feminist culture of entitlement quite nicely.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 03:33 AM
3

They aren't into competition, generally. This also explains why they choose not to pursue high level management jobs, because getting into those positions is extremely competitive.
/r/MensRights19/12/12 02:49 AM
16

I'm not disagreeing with you, but can you name a competitive, strategic or hand-to-eye coordination intensive game that women have consistently been at the top of? Target shooting and really long distance swimming are the only sports that they even compete on the same level as men, I think? Unless anyone can think of others?
/r/MensRights18/12/12 06:07 AM
1

You do not need to be held responsible or feel bad for other people's irrational fears. If they want to live their lives in fear of men they are perfectly without their capacity to do so, but they will live a miserable and terrified existence. There is nothing that you can do to change their views, so if you meet people like this just smile and be thankful that you are fortunate enough to have the rationality to realize just how crazy that line of thinking is.
/r/MensRights21/11/12 05:09 AM
36

That shows just how irrational most feminists are. They will dismiss an argument by virtue of who is saying the words, not based upon the words themselves. Seriously every time I bring up gender-related issues online I'm always attacked for my character, not on holes in my logic or argument. =/
/r/MensRights03/11/12 08:59 PM
1

Related
/r/MensRights28/10/12 04:05 PM
3

We agreed to stop posting this shit
/r/MensRights20/10/12 04:44 PM
1

Nobody questions anything when the paparazzi get PAID to take pictures of famous people without their consent, but all of a sudden when it is not-famous people getting their pictures taken (by people who do it only occasionally) it is immoral and illegal? Not only that, but it is worth literally ruining 30+ people's lives over? Give me a fucking break.
/r/MensRights17/10/12 02:13 AM
3

http://rense.com/general82/chom.htm
/r/MensRights09/10/12 06:16 PM
15

/r/mensrights can be a bit of a circlejerk, but at least we are having serious and honest discussions about issues which are dismissed by feminists and by society at large. So in that sense we are certainly facilitating "critical and dissident views" that are not presuppositioned by society at large that this quotation seems to embrace.
/r/MensRights09/10/12 02:54 AM
11

This article is pretty horrible and sexist...
/r/MensRights08/10/12 02:50 AM
2

Amazing series of posts, dude.
/r/MensRights07/10/12 10:59 PM
1

wat
/r/MensRights01/10/12 11:02 PM
5

The most striking example of this the Duke Lacrosse Rape case. Just watch like the first ~10 minutes of this video. It is absolutely fucking sickening.
/r/MensRights01/10/12 09:59 PM
2

I agree. I wrote the OP up in like 10 minutes, so I forgot to make my example gender-neutral. Good point
/r/MensRights01/10/12 09:40 PM
1

Did you read the article in the OP? How do you want to define oppression? The kinds in the study that they linked were all upper middle class white kids, but because of the trauma that they went as a kid they were way more likely to suffer from any number of unfortunate outcomes. What more evidence do you need? Like, a 2 minute google search brought me here: "A study of teenage mothers in inner city Baltimore found that one-third of their daughters also became teenage mothers. But, among childre…
/r/MensRights01/10/12 12:39 AM
4

When people talk about black/white/straight/male/female privilege, regardless of whether you believe those privileges actually exist, the privilege that you get from belonging to a certain demographic is TINY in comparison to the advantages that you get from having caring parents, some good, solid role models, not being abused, etc.
/r/MensRights30/09/12 03:21 PM
1

I think that the world would be a much, much better place if everybody was forced to watch that whole 3 hour, 40 minute video
/r/MensRights30/09/12 06:41 AM
1

Women tend to communicate with the "feelings" of who they are communicating with in higher priority. Men, on the other hand, tend to be more blunt and honest, even if that honesty would make who they are addressing uncomfortable. It's not necessarily a bad thing either way, it is just a different way of communicating.
/r/MensRights29/09/12 05:50 PM
1

To be fair, there is probably a lot of legitimate oppression of women by men over in Kenya. If this is what feminism fought to change (instead of fighting nebulous enemies of their own creation like "patriarchy" and "rape culture"), I would be a feminist in a second.
/r/MensRights28/09/12 05:58 PM
-1

Notice here that's it is always the men that need to take responsibility for their actions....
/r/MensRights28/09/12 05:36 PM
7

It doesn't matter how polite he is in his defense. If the woman gets angry and starts shouting at the guy society takes her side 90% of the time
/r/MensRights27/09/12 02:05 PM
1

That quiz is hilarious. "Discrimination against women is no longer a problem in the United States." Uhhh, Yeah I don't think it's as big of a problem as most feminists make it out to be "Sorry the correct answer is that it is still a massive problem, you sexist fuck"
/r/MensRights23/09/12 06:13 PM
3

That doesn't necessarily make women worse at engineering, it just means that they are less interested in it. There's a difference. I don't feel like looking up evidence to support this claim, but if you looked at how well those 20% women engineers did compared to their male peers, I'm willing to bet that they do just as well (if not better) than men. But yes, I agree that men and women are fundamentally wired differently. The fact that women tend to be steered away from the "fact-based" academia…
/r/MensRights18/09/12 12:22 AM
2

I took a gender studies class last fall, and there was nothing that we read that was written by a male author. Absolutely nothing. We had ~3 to 5 articles to read every week for 15 weeks and not a single article was written by a man. Some of the women that we read were pretty reasonable, but you cannot have a fair debate about gender issues when you only get the opinions of one of the genders. Granted, some of writers that we read were pretty reasonable, but others were straight up insane. I for…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 10:20 PM
1

It's clear that he married someone is not deserving of half of his assets, but through our flawed legal system she gets half of his assets but none of his liabilities....
/r/MensRights11/09/12 04:14 AM
3

they don't
/r/MensRights11/09/12 04:10 AM
6

My mom managed to have a very successful engineering career while raising three kids. I spent a lot of time in after school programs until like middle school, and then I spent my time after school doing sports. As for what happened for the ~5 years before I started kindergarden: I actually don't remember. I've never actually asked my mom how much time she spent at home for each of us or how she managed to stay working while raising us. It's definitely tough, and both of the parents will need to …
/r/MensRights11/09/12 02:23 AM
5

No, they can't. In a world where both sexes are created equally, both sexes are responsible for providing the financial support for their family (likewise on the emotional support, etc). If both sexes are contributing to the financial success of the family, then neither party will have any incentive to divorce (or any incentive NOT to divorce). But what women (and men) have to realize is that by stopping to work to care for the children, that they ARE dependent on their partner to provide for th…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 12:34 AM
13

In concept, what you said is perfectly logical. However in practice, the fact that a stay-at-home mom knows that she can get alimony creates a big financial incentive for her to get a divorce when she becomes dissatisfied with her marriage (or becomes bored, or for no reason whatsoever). On the other hand, the father has a negative-incentive to get a divorce should he become dissatisfied with his spouse. Why would he get a divorce if he has to dedicate potentially half of his income for the next…
/r/MensRights11/09/12 12:21 AM
-1

Why is it that the OP had no money? The sexist court system, clearly... Read the story...
/r/MensRights06/09/12 12:45 AM
-13

How can you even fucking ask that question? Can you imagine if a girl goes into a police station about how she was raped when she was unconcious, and they ask her "How is this affecting your life now?" Do you see how fucking terrible that sounds? Go fuck yourself
/r/MensRights04/09/12 11:46 PM
6

When you ask if each side is for equality, of course they will both say they are for equality. But what does that equality actually mean? The MRA's are for Equality of Choices and Equality of Consequences for those choices, where as Feminists are for Equality of Outcomes. There's a huge difference
/r/MensRights12/08/12 11:31 PM
25

This smells like a troll post, but even if it is shit like this can and does happen every day. Sorry to hear about that, OP. Good luck with that legal battle, I can't imagine how bitter you must be about everything right now
/r/MensRights11/08/12 04:10 AM
6

If you want to be treated as equals to men, prove that you ARE equal to men and stop asking to be given shit just because you're a woman
/r/MensRights03/08/12 06:43 PM
4

So basically you're saying that privilege is a function of socio-economic status and not about gender? Because I'm pretty sure all of these things make one gender more privileged than the other 1) being able to throw members of the opposite gender in jail with no evidence but your word 2) getting default child custody and "child" support payments in divorce 3) Having an advantage getting in the door in many technical and business positions due to your membership in a certain gender 4) Getting le…
/r/MensRights03/08/12 06:20 PM
2

At least your friends get to actually consume the drink once they buy it. Many ex-husbands pay child support to their ex-wifes without the child ever having any obligation to see their father
/r/MensRights01/08/12 12:52 PM
-5

As evidenced by the fact that basically every culture around the world has independently decided to put women before men, I think that it is in our hard-wiring to do this (and not just because our society conditions us to do this). The fact that we have realized how fucked up that is us overcoming that programming, and doing so is the only way to make real progress
/r/MensRights30/07/12 10:49 AM
2

I'm good either way =)
/r/MensRights30/07/12 10:30 AM
5

Why do women get the right to vote without the responsibility of defending that right via selective service?
/r/MensRights30/07/12 03:07 AM
10

Men are hard-wired to protect women and give them whatever they want. Women are hard-wired to demand more than they need from men.
/r/MensRights30/07/12 01:39 AM
2

It'd like to see the margin of error and confidence interval for that claim
/r/MensRights28/07/12 05:57 PM
2

How do the European court systems fair in comparison to the US courts when it comes to father's rights? I.E. compared to the USA: Do men get custody more often in europe? Pay less alimony on average? Are there less false rape accusations? Would moving to europe be a viable way to give us men a better chance from having our lives ruined by women?
/r/MensRights28/07/12 05:20 PM
8

The default gender in society depends upon what you define the default setting to be. At an engineering corporation, of course the default gender is going to be male, because more men choose to major in engineering. Likewise among nurses, teachers, etc the default gender will be female. Sure, you can say that that makes you "feel" uncomfortable, but science is not based on feelings, it is based on data. The data does not support your hypothesis that women are at a disadvantage in the workforce. …
/r/MensRights26/07/12 02:29 AM
1

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backfire_effect
/r/MensRights25/07/12 08:55 PM
15

More relevantly: how does the word of an 11 year old child with no evidence to back it up successfully put a man in jail for that long in the first place? In every other kind of trial there is always the burden of proof on the prosecutor to prove the positive: that the accused is guilty of the crime. But when a man is accused of raping a woman or a child, the burden of proof is on the man to prove that he is NOT a rapist. This is so unbelievably fucked up
/r/MensRights25/07/12 08:37 PM
2

I see what you mean, but I don't really agree with that logic because men commit more non-traffic stop related crime as well. Unless your hypothesis is that men become several standard deviations more law-abiding when they enter a moving vehicle then you don't really have an argument.
/r/MensRights12/07/12 02:51 AM
6

Men are better at transporting drugs for the same reasons that men are better policemen, firefighters and soldiers: we're generally more physically fit and we tend to be more willing to take more risks. So it doesn't make sense for a drug cartel to use women. But I think more relevantly: if we are so easily able to accept that the reason why women make less than men is not because of discrimination, but because of the differences in choices that women make when compared to men, then you need to …
/r/MensRights12/07/12 02:27 AM
27

Feminism is intentionally ambiguous to the point where, when someone calls themselves a feminist, you have really no idea what their views actually are. It's just a blanket term that women (and men) of wildly different views rally under, so that you get people with quiet rational views (like the OP) or people who are extremely hateful and misandristic (like Andrea Dworkin). While it is quite unfortunate that people like Ms. Dworkin exist (or, in her case, existed), what is even more unfortunate …
/r/MensRights11/07/12 10:32 PM
-3

Men statistically commit more of the of the types of crimes that police officer traffic stops are searching for. Like if theres a local drug cartel that consists of middle aged puerto rican men trafficing drugs, it just makes sense to search the cars of suspicious puerto rican men more than it does to search the cars of random white women. It's not discrimination, it's smart policing.
/r/MensRights11/07/12 06:39 PM
7

Well this is digusting
/r/MensRights11/07/12 03:43 PM
3

Some women misinterpret the body image portrayed by popular culture to mean that they need to like not eat anything at all (a la Kate Moss), when in reality women that are functionally athletic like runners or rock climbers are much more attractive in the eyes of basically every guy.
/r/MensRights09/07/12 11:22 PM
5

who the fuck downvotes the rightsbot? jesus
/r/MensRights09/07/12 11:09 PM
12

This story doesn't really have anything to do with men's rights.... but it undoubtedly is symbolic of how society treats men as a whole
/r/MensRights09/07/12 08:55 PM
1

I agree completely, thanks for the post
/r/MensRights09/07/12 05:39 PM
2

Men who spend most of their time around other men (like, for instance, at a gym) tend to grow a disdain for women. Likewise women that spend most of their time around other women tend to grow a disdain for men. This isn't rocket science
/r/MensRights09/07/12 12:24 AM
9

I like how the article uses peer-reviewed, double blind research studies in its citations to back up its claims.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 08:26 PM
1

name ANY activity that the best women in the world are better at than the best men in the world. Really long distance swimming I guess? Anything else?
/r/MensRights08/07/12 04:55 AM
4

I wouldn't mind paying a woman for half of an abortion (if I got her pregnant) under the condition that, if she chooses to have a child that I don't want, I do not have to pay to support a child that I never wanted to begin with. Naturally in this case I would not get any custody rights to the child.
/r/MensRights08/07/12 04:34 AM
6

If you are a police officer, do you want your partner to be less competent under the condition that they are paid less? How about if you're a fire fighter or a US Marine? It's not about pay, it's about finding the very best people to do the job. Anything less than the best doing the job and innocent people get hurt.
/r/MensRights07/07/12 10:45 PM
-2

Exactly, therefore men WILL be the most qualified to do those jobs and we WILL have more deaths in war and in the workplace as a result. So we need to stop citing those workplace death statistics as an example of male discrimination
/r/MensRights07/07/12 09:38 PM
1

I'm not disagreeing with you, but whatever physical fitness standards you set for men, there will be less of a percentage women that will be able to meet those standards. But more over, I have noticed some inconsistencies among r/mensrights. We want men in less dangerous jobs, but when we do the logical thing and try to lower the standards for women in order to "even up" the workplace death gap, we don't want to lower those standards? We certainly can't keep the standards the way they are, or we…
/r/MensRights07/07/12 08:26 PM
1

I agree completely
/r/MensRights30/06/12 09:49 PM
87

I don't understand why the "I'm drunk, therefore anyone that has sex with me is a rapist" defense. If a woman gets high on LSD or cocaine or something and robs a store, she is clearly responsible for her actions even despite the fact that she was not in the right state of mind when she did it. But if in this scenario you replace LSD with alcohol and robbing a store with having sex with some guy, all of a sudden it is not the girl's fault? I don't care if you want to call it victim blaming, but t…
/r/MensRights30/06/12 02:05 PM
9

If a woman wants to work in a traditionally masculine profession, that is her choice. If a guy wants to marry a woman who does not want to work, that is his choice. If a woman wants to be a stripper, that is her choice. What make's /r/mensrights awesome is that we DON'T talk about shit like this. Your post is a discussion about how the mens' rights movement should judge people's choices. And just by asking that question you are operating under the assumption that we should be judging people base…
/r/MensRights20/06/12 12:00 AM
18

I'm not a scientist, but I'm pretty sure it is not testicular cancer
/r/MensRights11/06/12 11:52 PM
2

hodor
/r/MensRights11/06/12 11:38 PM
2

I don't think that a guy should be able to have control over a women's body, so I don't think that a guy should be able to force a woman to have an abortion. But just like women can choose to absolve themselves of the fiscal and personal responsibility of child rearing through an abortion, a guy should be able to absolve all financial responsibility for the child under the condition that he is not allowed to contact the child again (unless the child themselves attempts to contact him when they r…
/r/MensRights03/06/12 10:16 PM
6

"a man being given the choice to opt out of any financial responsibilities to a child before it is born is selfish and irresponsible, but a woman doing the same thing with abortion is the most holy of freedoms."
/r/MensRights07/05/12 06:03 PM
1

You're awesome
/r/MensRights27/04/12 06:33 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter