TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

JoshtheAspie Archive

View 8 posts and 2,359 comments by JoshtheAspie on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Showing the 1,000 most recent of 2,359 comments.
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

I get what you're asking about. It really is an interesting last name. Kind of reminds me of that scene in Robin Hood: Men in Tights where they discussed the last name of the witch Latrine.
/r/MGTOW27/01/16 10:28 PM
1

chuckle Wow. Seriously? Does that mean something in a different language?
/r/MGTOW24/01/16 08:23 AM
2

Idiom?
/r/MGTOW21/01/16 02:43 PM
0

I hear the Japanese make several wonderfully competing products.
/r/MGTOW21/01/16 02:34 PM
1

We've got the instincts to make war on our neighbors at the slightest provocation as well. This is shown by studies of tribal cultures, in which man lived the majority of his time as a species. There are all kinds of modern substitutes as well, which I find superior to the original product at present due to the low risk of use.
/r/MensRights14/01/16 02:00 PM
–

As someone who is celibate, I reiterate the advice: Do not stick your dick in crazy.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 04:51 PM
1

An acceptable introductory video, but it could have delt more with how the school got it's name, and how Cultural Marxism and Freud are related.
/r/MensRights12/01/16 07:49 AM
3

Personally, I'd take it as a compliment, just like if someone called me anti-maoist, or anti-soviet.
/r/MensRights11/01/16 10:35 PM
1

Depends on the woman in my family. I've only got one left worth protecting, putting her deeply in the minority. Oh, and guess what, she's actually tended to me at my lowest and most vulnerable points, and does what she can do reduce her risk of needing my protection, as per the old-fashioned social contract!
/r/MGTOW10/01/16 12:04 AM
5

Yyyyno. See, if anything, he's the cuck, and trying to get us to be cucks. He wants us to spend our blood, treasure and time to protect women that are going to screw other men willingly, probably including the men we're supposed to 'protect' them from. Why would I make myself a Beta-Bucks cuck on purpose?
/r/MGTOW09/01/16 11:53 PM
6

Consider getting an air popper, or a popper that uses a ceramic plate in the microwave. Then you can apply whatever oil or butter, etc, you want for taste, without having to worry about smoking. I sometimes like a savory popcorn for a snack. Fresh popped + olive oil + some Italian spices, or dill.
/r/MGTOW09/01/16 11:52 PM
1

And they call confirmed bachelors 'selfish'.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 09:21 PM
3

I'm guessing he's the cocky kind of player that Feminists sleep with, then rationalize away (or accuse of rape after the fact). It's the 'gold stars' comment that got me. Men are not asking for gold stars. They're trying to avoid being categorized as rapist in the woman's mental pidgeon holes. That and the "fuckboy" comment. What is she talking about, rent-boys? Wouldn't that mean he would bend over and take it in the ass, instead of refusing to do so?
/r/MensRights08/01/16 02:25 AM
–

As a rule, it's also bad for the child.
/r/MensRights08/01/16 02:01 AM
2

There's two kinds of "good asshole" as well. There's the fellow who is just playfully teasing his gal, like he would his adult kids, or his beer-buddies... then there's the fellow that is cross, because something has happened that shouldn't and is making a correction. Being cross can cause you to come across like 'an asshole', because it's uncomfortable for those around you. But when people know that discomfort is carefully wielded to enact positive change, and doesn't come out often, that gener…
/r/TheRedPill07/01/16 08:47 AM
2

And the ability to choke a fool from across the table using their arcane powers, blast him with shocking grasp, or summon their glow-swords using mage-hand when disarmed.
/r/MensRights07/01/16 06:12 AM
–

You mean like Bill Cosby, who also shared drugs with the women he slept with (meaning he was providing resources)? I seem to recall there being news about that catching up with him.
/r/MensRights05/01/16 03:53 AM
–

The anti-prostitution feminists portray the women as victims of the 'actual horrible people' who pay for their services. They try to make prostitution legal for the prostitutes, but illegal for the Johns (and they ignore the existence of gigalos and rent-boys entirely). That is not feminists attempting to restrict women. That is feminists attempting to punish men to 'protect' women, who never ever would have made that choice ever at all in their wildest dreams given an actual un-coerced choice g…
/r/MensRights03/01/16 08:56 PM
0

Then why is he portraying it as a man denying a choice to a woman? If anything, the cartoonist is white knighting.
/r/MensRights03/01/16 08:52 PM
–

Eh, there's too many not-feminists being lumped in as feminists in this strip. For example, the author may have grievances with the red-pill sub-reddit, but that doesn't make them feminist. Also, how does 'anti-choice' even as he's defined it, fit in with feminism? Feminism is about increasing the number of privileges and 'rights' women have, while decreasing the amount of responsibility they face. Would not 'anti-choice' thus be one of many anti-feminist groups? If he wants to make some argumen…
/r/MensRights03/01/16 03:22 PM
1

Newp. Hundreds of datapoints confirm that wiki is horrible, just like the Nobel prize is a reason to get the fuck away from whatever it was awarded to. Similarly, if the Olympic commission chooses an area of the world get yourself away from it, because there is something rotten in the heart of Bejing.
/r/MGTOW02/01/16 04:02 PM
1

Because they keep your face warm in winter, and it's a waste of time to shave off something better at keeping your face warm and more comfortable than a scarf, that somehow doesn't make your face over-heat indoors.
/r/MGTOW29/12/15 05:41 PM
1

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMhfbLRoGEw I prefer this version.
/r/MGTOW29/12/15 05:37 PM
1

The fact that the majority of women will choose to have their children by a minority of men, if not restricted, would seem to indicate that each of this minority of men have greater reproductive value than each among the majority of women, who have greater reproductive value than each among the majority of men. And that's assuming that the only metric of value is involvement in reproduction, which is a piss poor assumption. You are making assertions, and not even logically processing them, then …
/r/TheRedPill22/12/15 07:34 AM
1

Personally, a lot of my focus is on ways to be more independent from the herd, because I don't like being anywhere near it. In particular, the idea that I should kill myself for a job at a parasitical business where they lie to me about the duties and working conditions as a part of the hiring process. That idea is just insane to me, particularly given how much of that is going to be taken in taxes to pay for someone else not to work, and how little loyalty companies show their employees these d…
/r/MGTOW21/12/15 10:11 PM
1

You keep repeating the assertion that women are more valuable than men because of womb, but you don't back it up. And so long as those reading your posts don't agree with your assertion, any points built on the assertion will be unconvincing. And, as far as slave prices went in the American slave trade, men actually typically went for more, because they were suited to more kinds of work. In particular, a healthy, muscular male slave could be worth multiple female slaves. That info is from memory…
/r/TheRedPill21/12/15 10:04 PM
1

Alright. So you are saying that the repeated claim that you would harm one of your male friends was you breaking frame. That could have been more clear in earlier posts, but we're on the same page now. Good. I would encourage you to avoid loss of control in regards to anyone. That said, the womb is only as valuable as people pretend it is if being used for maximum or near-maximum output. Otherwise, for breeding purposes, you can replace 5 women that only pop out one or two kids, with one woman w…
/r/TheRedPill21/12/15 09:36 PM
1

I'm not confusing anything. You have stated that you will give women the pussy pass because they are women, and are repeatedly defending that decision. That is white knighting. The scale of the penalty to which you are applying the pussy pass just makes the white knighting that much more egregious. I could just as easily say that a woman that drowns her child for attention 'cannot understand the act when she is upset due to lack of attention'. But they still need to be punished to the same degre…
/r/TheRedPill21/12/15 09:06 PM
1

The Japanese. <sup>[1]</sup> <sup>[2] <sup>[3]</sup> <sup>[4]</sup>
/r/MGTOW21/12/15 08:49 PM
2

Oh, I'm working on my plans for societal collapse, as I can in my circumstances. I just find that quite often people talk about societal collapse, but then don't have plans for it, so I think it important to get people thinking along these lines, if they aren't already.
/r/MGTOW21/12/15 08:09 PM
1

Women know the effect of their venom. That's why they unleash it. That they hampsterbate it away is not an excuse for their unleashing the venom. Venom is venom. And seriously harming someone is seriously harming someone. For society, of which you are a part, to continually reward women with all the privileges of having agency, but none of the consequences there of (such as your committing murder) is failing the biggest shit test there is. " Any criticism of a woman ever" what is that, did you f…
/r/TheRedPill21/12/15 08:05 PM
1

You may have mis-spelled knob-gobblers.
/r/MGTOW21/12/15 05:48 AM
1

He went to Jared!
/r/MGTOW21/12/15 05:41 AM
3

Don't appeal to her verbally at all. Evoke the emotions.
/r/MGTOW21/12/15 05:40 AM
1

WOOOOO! Go man go! Let her know it will NEVER happen.
/r/MGTOW21/12/15 05:39 AM
0

Here we see the white knight in it's native habitat, any criticism of a woman ever. Notice how it is willing to kill males over verbal abuse, but will instead show a female the door with but a single insult. Truly, this is one of the greatest demonstrations to be found of the male biological impulse to excuse women from conduct that would not be similarly excused from a man. How low the mighty knight has fallen from the days when chivalry was a warrior's code. Now, even the crude and simplic 'br…
/r/TheRedPill21/12/15 05:12 AM
1

That's a classic case of having some bad experiences of being mistreated by men and then blaming a whole gender for it, something which I'm not willing to do. And yet when I point to systemic issues, such as false rape accusations, men and boys being raped and the perpetrators being excused, and how as a result I don't particularly care when a man gets off that others 'just know' is guilty, and start threatening... somehow it's inferred that I have a chip on my shoulder.
/r/MensRights18/12/15 04:39 AM
-1

http://www.bigberkeywaterfilters.com/ You guys might be interested in these filters. Also, avoid over-use of soy, which they put in everything.
/r/TheRedPill17/12/15 10:50 PM
–

Hello fellow Aspie. And the meme implies that the person does not actually have a plan to profit. Thus the "???" showing a lack of connection between the step prior to ??? and the profit.
/r/MensRights17/12/15 10:43 PM
–

Actually just do what you want when elected Which is to profit. I.e. have the power to be involved in exchanges of money and power. You don't need the ??? part.
/r/MensRights15/12/15 12:49 PM
1

And saying "no draft" would be just such a commitment. As would be "men and women are both to submit to selective service, and the armed forces shall draw from both sexes equally". In that case, when war comes around, there will be a lot of excuses made, and women getting pregnant and pinning the support costs on the men they got 'oops, pregnant' with. And if they -do- manage to coral a bunch of women, you'll have lower physical standards, and more logistical costs, along with a mix of guys that…
/r/MensRights07/12/15 08:45 AM
–

If they want to keep to firm legal ground, and also excuse women from having a new state-forced responsibility, the answer is simple: Eliminate "selective service" (the registration for the draft). Then women don't have to register, and there is (in this sphere) paper equality between the sexes. Of course if some war comes along later, where the higher ups think the draft is needed, they'll still draft people.
/r/MensRights05/12/15 07:31 AM
2

I am indeed. It is that standard fantasy to which I make reference.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 12:53 AM
1

The lesson that most, if not all modern human authority is inherently flawed and how it is important to put checks on power is a very important lesson, and required for us to make any kind of change to that authority, if such a change is even actually possible. How to teach it and when is something to reasonably discuss. My issue was with your describing as a bad lesson, the lesson of how corrupt current authority figures are.
/r/MensRights19/11/15 12:51 AM
2

You're quite welcome. When I can link interested and receptive people to information sources to help them learn or expand their perspective, I enjoy doing so. <sup>_</sup>^
/r/MensRights19/11/15 12:45 AM
–

Dalrock has explained this in far more detail than belongs in a single reddit comment, so I'll link you to his blog post on the movie. Craven
/r/MensRights18/11/15 10:25 AM
1

You aren't doing a great job of that atm.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 02:21 AM
–

Let's take a look at the "what they say" vs what they do differences then, shall we? Teachers: "We will teach all of the students in our care what they need to know, and help them to develop" We know for a fact that the school system is biased against boys. Not just due to politician policies, but due to anti-boy biases in the female teachers themselves, who are the vast majority of teachers out there. Boys are punished more often, villified more often, drugged more often, and there are biases a…
/r/MensRights18/11/15 02:09 AM
–

Because they enjoy the fantasy of someone wanting them SOOOO much, that he just has to use force.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 01:13 AM
–

I was more talking about the "say one thing, do something else" bit. That's what's incentivised for "leaders" after all.
/r/MensRights18/11/15 01:12 AM
–

What she's doing is objectively horrible for boys because: She is teaching boys that authority figures say one thing and do another, and that they will be punished for no reason. That's actually a pretty valuable and universal lesson when it comes to modern human authority figures. It'd probably be true of computerized AI overlords as well.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 07:28 PM
2

In this case, I think glorious leader would be replaced with 'the glorious hive-mind of the feminist coven'
/r/MensRights17/11/15 08:18 AM
1

I didn't intend to continue discussing with you, but I'm going to give you this very easily searched for link for your edification. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genetic_fallacy
/r/MensRights17/11/15 06:11 AM
1

Most societies find outlets for the agression of masculine men, and praise those who succeed well at those outlets, while constraining violence only to those outlets. When such outlets are no longer honored (rightly or wrongly) the society will excise those men, making it far more likely the society will fall come the next threat, or those men who retain aggression will become the threat, and once again take power. Further, no fault divorce, extortion of men to provide for women as a whole witho…
/r/MGTOW17/11/15 04:09 AM
1

So rather than actually dealing with the point made, you're resorting to the genetic fallacy. And yet I'm "the moron". You must be "Winning!" Seriously though, this is pathetic, and thus it is over.
/r/MensRights17/11/15 03:50 AM
–

Then you will be in a struggle with a bureaucrat, while committing multiple felonies. http://www.amazon.com/Three-Felonies-Day-Target-Innocent-ebook/dp/B00505UZ4G?tag=duckduckgo-d-20 You really don't seem to be getting this very basic truism.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 07:03 PM
1

There are lots of things these days that are fun. Video games are fun. Going for a walk in the woods is fun, and restorative. Practicing martial arts is fun and rewarding (and teaches you a valuable skill). If I wanted to participate in a risky and extreme "fun" activity that was a huge rush, but safer than having sex, I'd go and jump out of a plain with some nylon strapped to my back, and sail back to earth. I hear some people also enjoy the running of the bulls. Having a stampede of angry catt…
/r/MGTOW16/11/15 02:34 AM
–

No matter what you do in a struggle with a government official, you've not only broken the law, you've committed a felony. It's apparent at this point that you have no point to make, unless you're suggesting people roll over and accept whatever government officials do.
/r/MensRights16/11/15 02:30 AM
2

I enjoy reversing the original feminist phrase. "A man needs a woman, like a bicycle needs a fish. Seriously, why get your gears gummed up with that fishy slime?"
/r/MGTOW15/11/15 05:23 PM
4

All feminists have used shaming tactics. Heck, even the suffragettes used shaming tactics. Non-feminist men and women use shaming tactics as well. It is a mode of social power and manipulation. What do you think those posters during WWI and WWII about "do with less, so he can have enough" referring to the soldiers were? They were shaming. What about all of those posters shaming people for "hoarding"?
/r/MGTOW15/11/15 05:18 PM
–

Stepping out of your house/apartment in the morning is risky. You'll probably commit a felony before you get to work/school, and you never know what malicious government entity will choose to punish you for something you do that's still legal, by activating a punishment on one of those felonies. I don't see any point in what you are saying. It is like you are saying a particular patch of sky is blue.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 05:06 PM
1

And people wonder why I find it a bad idea to breed.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 06:16 AM
2

A. Please don't link to that site. B. I took a look at some of the images that were presumably of the things on sale and... I wouldn't want to buy any of it anyway.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 04:08 AM
2

Why would you even want to post there in the first place?
/r/MensRights15/11/15 04:03 AM
3

"You're either on board, or you're not, bro." I'm just gonna go with "not" here, and stop watching.
/r/MensRights15/11/15 04:01 AM
–

"The college does not support speech that is discriminatory" ... ....
/r/MensRights14/11/15 08:34 PM
–

So what if it's a felony? At this point, so is eating turtle soup if the turtles came from new york. "A felony" is basically any normal action at this point. That warning is basically like "you might have to breath while doing it".
/r/MensRights14/11/15 08:30 PM
–

Is this an implication about trans-status or something? Language has gone so Bucking PC, I can't tell any more.
/r/MensRights14/11/15 08:28 PM
4

While the concept of "social contracts" is an interesting one, most of the folks who follow what you call the "nice guy" social contract do so because they believe in "natural consequences" of actions. Eat to much, exercise too little? Get fat. Exercise and don't over-eat? Be skinny and in good shape. Natural consequences. Of course, even here, there are variations. Some people are mesomorphs and can eat all they want and still be skinny-muscular. Some are ectomorphs and have trouble putting on …
/r/TheRedPill13/11/15 01:21 PM
1

Well here's one link from a simple search on the phrase "well regulated digestion" http://www.constitution.org/cons/wellregu.htm And while linguistic facts are unlikely to roil and derail, I'm not going to touch other parts of your argument, as I don't believe this to be the place to do so. I just provided some information I thought might be of interest.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 11:44 PM
1

I your use of Orwell was also double-plus good.
/r/TheRedPill12/11/15 10:15 AM
1

Traditionally, through trade and barter.
/r/MensRights12/11/15 09:59 AM
–

I can't for the life of me understand the NRA though. It's says well regulated militia in the 2nd amendment. Well regulated. Well one of the reasons has to do with lingual drift. In this case, over-use of a particular meaning by bureaucrats. When the constitution was written, people would talk of a "well regulated digestion" to mean one that was in proper working order. You don't particularly think that meant someone somewhere had passed some form or ordinance, that the colonies required a permi…
/r/MensRights12/11/15 09:50 AM
13

It's definitely a symptom of the larger life cycle of empires. At some point, there is a dip or decline, and rather than accepting that short-term pain, the people or the leadership try to disguise it, and pretend that everyone is getting continually getting richer. And at the same time, a class of hedonists develops, there is some form of 'sexual liberation' that is celebrated (such as the naked women walking about in Rome on certain days, choosing men to have sex with). And then the traditiona…
/r/TheRedPill12/11/15 12:30 AM
2

Well if it's for help in the science of having sex, then the professor needs to be extra careful to avoid the appearance of impropriety, doesn't he?
/r/MensRights12/11/15 12:01 AM
0

The problem is that, as a rule, this is the type of company that is bailed out by the government, or is supported by universities that receive tax dollars. They're free to do what they like, so long as they don't take my money through government force, and I'm still free to give them the middle finger. The only place I've ever seen MSNBC on a public TV, for example, was in a student union.
/r/MensRights11/11/15 11:56 PM
–

Being forced by the government to labor on the behalf of someone else. And if you try to refuse (say, run away), then agents of the government, or private agents will come and put you in jail, or enact some form of physical punishment (perhaps both).
/r/MensRights11/11/15 11:46 PM
4

Well if you did, it'd be men that come and deal with you, and men that fix the damage to the walls, as per your own list. So perhaps you should listen to some music and relax, instead.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 01:19 PM
2

Given the definition of "distant from something else", or "distant from the norm" I don't think that "radical" is necessarily bad in this case. Just recognizing the needs and the problems that men have, or that women can actually be criminals, or create problems, or abuse people, makes you radical these days.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 01:18 PM
5

People tend to forget that celibacy is an option, whether or not it is facilitated by porn and masturbation. I honestly don't know why.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 01:13 PM
–

"Lady" should not be used to describe that woman. "Woman" would be neutral. There are many words that are appropriately negative. Also, there was another copy-cat that sent her husband's genitalia through the garbage disposal, to ensure it could not be re-attached.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 01:11 PM
4

This puts all of those clips from family feud in a new light.
/r/MensRights10/11/15 01:09 PM
27

Disabled vet. No longer actually in the service, or is being severed, and the advocates will set up the account themselves if they can convince the vet to let them. Why? Because they don't want to have to deal with the same guy, with legitimate medical needs, coming back, and being unable to give him anything, all because his wife cleaned out the bank account and left, a couple weeks after he gets the cash. And thank you for once again reinforcing that "hoarding" just means 'saving up resources …
/r/MensRights09/11/15 11:22 PM
5

And thus the demands for student debt forgiveness when people that, for example, get a PhD in puppetry can't find jobs to repay their loans. That was an actual case of one of the protesters at Occupy Wallstreet.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 10:28 PM
1

I've actually directly explained and linked the statistics to my mother and step-father, and they're supportive of the fact that I don't want to get married. I've laid it out that I can continue to be celibate my whole life, and that the Bible says that if you can, it's better to be single. They've recognized it as a valid choice, and don't push or pester. In fact, the fact that I've been consistently telling them this for over a decade has convinced them it's not a "fad" either. Where they get …
/r/MGTOW09/11/15 10:07 PM
7

And to answer your question in another branch you, yourself, are the troll, as evidenced by your reply. I'm going to stop feeding you now. toodles.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 10:01 PM
7

You opening move was to lob an accusation of misogyny. That... doesn't really play well with people who have basically decided the word is meaningless from over-use. It exposes more about your own mental attitudes that you use it, than it does about the person you accused.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 09:48 PM
5

I let my mother in on the truth in a bit gentler a manner. Dribble here, dribble there. Pointing to statistics, instead of to her behavior. "You may be glad to have gotten rid of Dad, but this is what witnessing divorce first hand has opened my eyes to."
/r/MensRights09/11/15 09:44 PM
–

There's a big reason that one of the biggest pieces of advice that the advocates assigned to disabled vets is that they put their disabled payout in a "you only" bank account.
/r/MensRights09/11/15 09:41 PM
22

"Liberal". I think the word you're looking for is "fascist".
/r/TheRedPill08/11/15 10:50 AM
18

It's fairly obvious that you have reversed the direction of comparison in order to disgust yourself, and make that disgust public. Spin spin hampster, on your wheel of gold. Yes it's yellow plastic, but your eyes are getting oooooOOOOOLD.
/r/TheRedPill08/11/15 10:44 AM
11

Also, sometimes a divorcee with a young-adult or college aged sun will wind up having "just the two of us" meals with him, out. She'll pay attention to him, dote on his stances and opinions on the way most children have wanted from their parents all their lives, but actually be having an adult discussion at the same time. In effect, she will be using him as a surrogate husband, so she has someone to respect and go on dates with. Of course (hopefully) there will be 0 sex, and the authority is rev…
/r/TheRedPill08/11/15 10:27 AM
2

Don't forget the various "passive incomes" provided by the state, that women vote for. And that, in particular, white knights are more likely to vote for certain types of these "passive incomes" than the type of feminists that want to force women into the work-force. As a result, women that want to replace the husband with the state are more likely to vote for men. They get the protection of the alpha general and his men, and the beta-bucks of the scientist who gets no sex, but pays the taxes th…
/r/MensRights08/11/15 02:28 AM
4

And of course people commit 3 felonies a day due to the criminalization of life, so it's no wonder the disfavored "scum of the earth" sex gets arrested more often.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 11:52 PM
3

Actually, you're taking a big risk by believing it. You open yourself up to abuse, and accusations of abuse if you risk associating yourself with the mentally unbalanced, who socially attack others. If you believe her claims by default, you risk your own safety as a tool to be used to ameliorate her risks. Let's put it another way. Let's presume that you want to believe everyone with a story of woe, male or female. You are now in the position of believing both that the boyfriend abused her, and …
/r/TheRedPill07/11/15 11:33 PM
3

Not sure about in England, but in the US that's the "Deluth model of domestic violence" enshrined in the "Violence Against Women Act". This is why I near-ghost MGTOW. I come around here to mull the philosophy and get practical tips on handling women I have to deal with.
/r/TheRedPill07/11/15 11:29 PM
1

The "Boy power" bookmark, for parity? Personally, I like the learning-orientation of the scientific method, and the Spanish color-teaching bookmark. Though it ignores the often cyclic method of the scientific method.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 09:56 PM
1

Because according to progressives, in particular those on campuses, any conduct a woman does not desire, which relates to sex in any way, is sexual harassment. She does not desire this conduct, and has witnesses. TADA!
/r/MensRights07/11/15 09:08 PM
–

Due to women living longer, for a number of reasons, including men being over-represented in dangerous jobs, and due to the spending on women's health being many times that of the spending on men's health. Also, due to the fact that if men try to take care of their health, or raise awareness or money for men's health, it is mocked and villified.
/r/MensRights07/11/15 09:03 PM
–

And then she yells at you and brands you a creep (meaning: she doesn't find you attractive), if she hasn't resorted to that tactic already. And she accuses you for sexual harassment, and the copper badges come and lock you away behind iron bars. Which goes back to the original point of: "Never have sex".
/r/MensRights06/11/15 11:23 AM
–

The typical response will be "But -I- didn't ask for that. It's those bullshit not-real-feminists that ruin feminism for everyone that asked for that!"
/r/MensRights05/11/15 11:02 AM
2

That seems like the ages old tactic of providing a distraction during the immediate event, so that a person can deal with an issue long term? You can do the same thing with a kid by handing the kid a game controller and having him roll up a huge ball of stuff in kotodomari, or shoot eggs out of Yoshi's butt. Older version? Give someone work to do so he doesn't have time to think about what just happened. That's been employed with soldiers and physical laborers since... probably before modern his…
/r/TheRedPill04/11/15 06:58 AM
1

I've read some pretty long posts by the guy, and I can't even remotely agree with you. At this point, I think you are purposefully misunderstanding him.
/r/MensRights04/11/15 02:47 AM
2

I swear the mental gymnastics some people go through to become a victim is astounding. Pretty much sums up the entire controversy, from the seed to the current status.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 11:02 AM
–

Sarcasm. He's claiming the opposite. That it's an affectation, and that this is not natural. It's pretty blatant sarcasm.
/r/MensRights28/10/15 11:01 AM
–

And once again you have chosen the cudgel of the word "bigotry" and added to it the cudgel "misogyny", rather than offer a rebuttal to someone else's points. I don't particularly see anything to be gained from further conversation. I wish you a good night (or good day, depending on your location).
/r/MensRights25/10/15 10:52 AM
1

However, in a highly materialistic society, what you are able to convince someone else to give you money for, may not be in line with your own view of what betters society, and in many cases it will not be. If I was able to get a job doing programming for a "game" to advance the .77 on the dollar myth, I would be getting paid, but I would not be improving society. Nor would I be if my job was putting boxes of boobie beads and cheep gag sombreros on shelves.
/r/MensRights25/10/15 09:17 AM
–

Wouldn't that supposed stake lead to the man working less, in order to have time to actually better society on behalf of his children? More work is more in line with "Need to pay the doctor bills to have marsha's broken nose fixed" than "Hey, this job putting boxes of boobie beads and giant gag sombreros on shelves really betters humanity. I should work more hours at that, instead of spending time leading a boy-scout troop for my son." And those jobs where people honestly feel like they are doin…
/r/MensRights25/10/15 08:51 AM
–

Frustration results if you desire something, but are to (according to your world-view) entitled to it. Another example is when feminists quote the 77 cents to the dollar myth. If this statistic was actually truthfully constructed and not a misrepresentation, then it would be quite reasonable for women to be angry. Being paid 77% of what a co-worker is paid for the same work, when you negotiated just as hard, etc, would be unjust, and thus a justifiable source of healthy anger. So in this case, t…
/r/MensRights25/10/15 07:10 AM
3

It's also, like many feminist statistics, absolutely false. Married-for-life men out-live single-for-life men by, on average, 1 year, but outlive married-and-divorced men by 5 years, on average. The statistics used always group the married-and-divorced guys in with the "singles". So the decision to marry actually has an expected value of shortening your lifespan.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 08:34 PM
2

You have to pick up after him. Is this the ok one so that you get support for the more inane ones? Well this one depends too. There's a difference between "have to" and "choose to", but just like with nagging, one is often described as the other. If there is a miss-match in how messy people like/can tolerate a home, and he tosses his stuff down when he gets home from a long day, intending to pick it up after he's had a shower, or a brief a sit down, or one cold one, and by the time he's done she…
/r/MensRights24/10/15 08:32 PM
–

First of all, anger arrises from a mismatch between's one's expectations, and one's perception of reality. If one's perception of reality, and one's expectations are reasonable, then so is the anger. For example, I expect people not to shoot children in the head. That is a reasonable expectation. If someone, in fact, shoots a child in the head (and it's not a delusion on my part), it is very reasonable for me to be angry that the child was shot in the head. Anger, meanwhile, is not an inherently…
/r/MensRights24/10/15 08:24 PM
–

There is a correlation between longer hours worked, and marriage. Women may well look for men that work longer hours and are wealthier. On the other hand, it may also be that men who get married are pressured to earn more money for their wife and children, and thus work longer hours, and do more to seek out promotions than do singles, who do not have the extra pressures.
/r/MensRights24/10/15 08:18 PM
–

Men used to have longer lifespans until medical technology drastically decreased the number of women who die in childbirth. There has been no similar breakthrough for men's health, in part because Women, and Women's diseases get more medical funding, research, and publicity. Even problems that hit men harder than women and are among the top killers of women now devote their awareness campaigns and an out-sized amount of research to female victims. For example, heart disease. Women in the third w…
/r/MensRights23/10/15 02:54 AM
3

They can force you to answer the way they want as a condition of being a student. They're already doing that with training in the business world. "You have to complete this training. It's your job." "The answers are wrong. It won't accept the right answers." "Just answer like you're supposed too! Everyone has to do it. Why do you have to be so difficult? Do you even want to work here?" No, but the corporations have paid cash to both parties to pass special rules to crowd out the smaller business…
/r/MensRights17/10/15 10:27 PM
1

Meaning that I can block an alert about a tornado bearing down on me, but not the president's announcement, should he choose to make one, about starting up a SECOND council on women and girls. As for the amber alerts? Yeah, I turn those off too. I have partial face blindness -- see my user name, Aspergers tends to include face blindness. So even if I saw the picture of the kid, then saw the real child in a different context 5 min later, I couldn't help if I wanted to.
/r/MensRights17/10/15 06:09 PM
–

Too bad you can't turn off the presidential alerts. It's not like I want to receive messages from big brother. And if aliens do attack, I doubt the president is going to use the system in time to beat out other sources of news.
/r/MensRights13/10/15 08:50 AM
2

A. Bills that pass based on emotion rather than reason are unlikely to be reasonable. In fact, the tendency is that bad laws are passed based on emotions, and lies, and bills passed based on emotions and lies are bad laws. As a result, it is reasonable to oppose such laws until someone can prove that they aren't the crap that 99% of laws pushed this way are. B. The people passing the laws don't read them either, so why should we let them pass them so we can find out what's in them? C. More damag…
/r/MensRights13/10/15 08:48 AM
2

And more men are raped than women, but it's training on not raping women. Because suddenly a handful of female soldiers being raped ranks more highly than the millions of male soldiers being raped (whether by the enemy or 'allies') as a tool of war through history. Chivalry is rotten to the core.
/r/MensRights12/10/15 02:07 AM
3

Oh no! The petitions, they do nussink!
/r/MensRights06/10/15 05:31 AM
7

The police system is neither evil nor good. It is a tool (usually a weapon) with certain characteristics that can sometimes be used to your advantaged, and will sometimes be used against you. In a conflict between a man and a woman, the police will almost always side with the woman. As such, risk mitigation is necessary any time the police are involved.
/r/MensRights28/09/15 05:04 AM
1

Before Moses really. Moses was spared because of one of many slaughters.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 05:28 AM
–

Christian and Jew slaughtering in the region has quite the long history. Goes back at to the time of Christ himself for Christians, and to the book of Exodus for Jews.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 05:20 AM
–

Well in absolute numbers it's just common sense given all of the factions, but then some people consider it "common sense" that more female civilian casualties die in the middle east then men "because all the men that die are soldiers", so I tend to look for info on things like this.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 03:53 AM
–

That's an interesting assertion. Any recommendations on where to look into more info?
/r/MensRights20/09/15 03:00 AM
2

I've been searching for quite some time. There is no country that does not suck so bad as to deserve being removed from the earth as a political or cultural entity. The question that remains is "what country sucks the least for you."
/r/MensRights20/09/15 02:32 AM
–

Don't forget that Christians don't exactly have good life expectancy in the middle east (with the exception of Israel) either.
/r/MensRights20/09/15 02:31 AM
1

Family Guy: Men - We know how to be friends
/r/TheRedPill18/09/15 09:18 PM
1

... I am now concerned about the anatomy of your brain.
/r/MensRights17/09/15 04:49 AM
1

And yet you referred to "the rest of you" as people who can pee standing up. That does not include biologically unaltered female humans.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 10:37 PM
–

"The rest of you" referring to people with catheters is nonsensical, given the extreme minority status, even in the context of the conversation thread. Seriously, several orders of magnitude difference.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 09:57 PM
–

"like the rest of you" when women are over half the US population. :P
/r/MensRights16/09/15 01:44 PM
–

You're one of them thar "trans-humanists" aincha?
/r/MensRights16/09/15 03:11 AM
3

So, you're suggesting men-only hours so the men don't have to see women work out then, right? Because the women-only hours aren't the only time women are allowed to use the gym.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 02:19 AM
1

Possibly accuse them of being "transphobic" and "fat-philic" while you're at it.
/r/MensRights16/09/15 02:14 AM
3

Statement unclear. "The birds" are a multitude.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 10:08 PM
–

"Sheinals" (I did not invent the term) have additional hygene issues above and beyond those of urinals, as they often require direct contact from the genital area to form a proper seal. You'd need something similar to the Japanese restroom floor-troughs for sanitary reasons, and those would present additional cleaning problems upon introduction, and still take up as much space.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 10:05 PM
1

He said, with a friendly joking smirk. See, this is why smiles, as dumb as they look to a lot of people, gained popularity.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/15 02:57 PM
4

Or separate software packages that can be purchased later if they aren't offered for free, this is theoretically possible, presuming you buy extra room and power to start. However, how often do computers slow down over time now, even if they aren't used in mechanical tasks, due to more and more updates presuming newer and newer models with more and more processing and memory? In my experience updates (or new modules that are integrated to a central program, now requiring updates for the integrat…
/r/MensRights15/09/15 02:56 PM
0

In the cases above, I think the issue is that we need a better way to punctuate our pronouncements.
/r/TheRedPill15/09/15 06:43 AM
–

Now, add the functionality to tidy the house (like a more advanced roomba), fold clothing, and make simple dishes like rice in a rice cooker, sandwhiches, and bring you a beer. Then, next model up can sort the mail into various piles, and keep bills organized by date due (including the paper ones you want for your filing cabinet). Hey, maybe you can program some of them (for those that are interested) to gently rock a cradle, make a variety of soothing sounds, etc, to reduce the number of times …
/r/MensRights15/09/15 06:11 AM
10

See: Anita Sarkezian talking about video game characters. See: Any feminist anywhere talking about animated or CG movies (and a large number of live action ones). They'll continue to use the same rhetoric to justify outlawing the bots. And for some reason, people listen, and will likely continue to do so.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 06:03 AM
1

At this point, we've got an accusation I can't bring myself to believe any more (too many cries of wolf), against a group I am well aware abuses it's power and gets away with way too much. I'd be ambivalent, if I could care any more.
/r/MensRights15/09/15 05:39 AM
3

What I hear you saying is: "if you've already hit her to defend yourself, hide the body".
/r/TheRedPill14/09/15 11:07 PM
–

Good site. Also, I haven't used the following, but have heard good things. https://www.khanacademy.org/
/r/MensRights14/09/15 10:58 PM
8

When he went off to work, and paid for a maid for his wife to go around to socials, and try to change this law, and that law, and thus custom, and that custom, and 'won't someone think of the children'? Thank you, no!
/r/MGTOW12/09/15 03:40 PM
2

I "admit" no such thing. I seek no such thing as "social justice" because I think the phrase itself is nonsense. There's justice, and then there's nonsense. I specified feminist strain for you, because they tend to be the only ones that are able to ignore such common sense on purpose when presented with it in such a flat and common-sense manner. So now you have acknowledged the answer to the only question you asked that I cared to answer in the first place. That wasn't particularly difficult, no…
/r/MensRights12/09/15 03:09 PM
1

In part because that's 6 weeks of pay, and 6 weeks of suddenly having a worker missing. If you take a look at it from the employer's perspective it's pretty nuts. If the position is critical enough, not only do I have to hire a replacement, but because the person is (maybe?) going to come back after, that position is only good for 6 weeks, but then maybe I'll have to eliminate the new worker, or maybe I'll have to keep the worker. How the heck am I supposed to get producitive work in a skilled p…
/r/MensRights12/09/15 03:07 PM
2

"Dude", I do think for myself, and that's why I don't believe that a guy that's being a duche, can't put together something so basic as "Those civilians that are most likely to be slaughtered are the ones that most need to leave the area. That is the issue we are discussing." is anything but a troll. If you are that dumb, then obviously you are infected with feminist strain sjw.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 07:19 PM
2

Meh. Better to be salty than troll or SJW flavored.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 04:59 PM
1

I can, I just don't believe you're that stupid that you can't read the chain thus far and understand why men have more need to get away from the war zone. Thus, since your actions can't be explained by stupidity, I am attributing them to malice.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 04:44 PM
2

Yeah. Troll.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 04:37 PM
–

Read further up this comment chain.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 03:06 PM
–

Given that, even the way they measure it, it was 89 cents on the dollar work-force wide the last time I checked, and they're still all citing 77 cents because that's the talking point embedded in their brains... what makes you think they'd stop quoting it?
/r/MensRights11/09/15 02:55 PM
–

One of the problems with this is that you either force a private group to pay someone for not doing the work they were hired to do, or the couple goes without income for several months, as both parents take time off. Another problem is that you then either need to provide an equivalent benefit for those that don't have children, or you are unreasonably discriminating against them. Why should I, as a single, get less for the same amount of work, or the same amount for more work? I find the option…
/r/MensRights11/09/15 02:52 PM
–

That people keep talking about women and children fleeing, to tug on people's heart strings, when the men are the ones that most need to get out of harms way.
/r/MensRights11/09/15 02:48 PM
1

Even worse is "If momma ain't happy, ain't no one happy." Basically, women do things that would get you locked up for emotional "terrorism". Appease them. I'd rather just not have one, thanks. Proverbs 27:15-16 15 A constant dripping on a day of steady rain And a contentious woman are alike; 16 He who would restrain her restrains the wind, And grasps oil with his right hand.
/r/MGTOW10/09/15 03:47 AM
1

Who?
/r/MensRights08/09/15 03:42 AM
–

My response to #1. The motivational speaker will always say to trust her.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 03:03 PM
14

So, tell me again about that "thin blue line" and why I should care about two groups that want to do me harm killing each-other?
/r/MensRights07/09/15 02:35 PM
1

Yet another reason to keep strict control of your sperm at all times: The state can come after you, even if the baby-momma is middle class.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 02:29 PM
19

"Would you fight for anything?" "How do you think I got here?" hehe Despite getting talked over here and there, when given a moment to reflect and respond, she had some really good rejoinders. Also, note that instead of letting the original female questioner do follow up, the male feminist host feels the need to explain the point for her.
/r/MensRights07/09/15 12:59 PM
2

Thank you very much.
/r/MensRights06/09/15 06:33 PM
–

I am not. I am already aware of the limitations of science in general, and in particular how they apply more to the "social sciences", and how medicine is in a grey area between the hard-sciences and the non-sciences. I have made reference to some of those factors here, but I did not care to spend the energy to look up the exact figure, or cite existing articles. Science is a good tool. But that's all it is, a tool. And when misused, or used for improper purposes, it does about as much good as u…
/r/MensRights06/09/15 05:34 PM
–

I agree that we have hit an impasse. In particular, that you keep referring to nuance. Nuance does not determine whether a statement is correct, or incorrect, or necessarily the understanding of a subject. Frankly, I think that the critiques of Sociology which you find 'better' but fail to convince you, probably miss the point. I have already determine that sociology and it's jargon are bunk, and don't need to read up on other people criticizing it to reinforce my position. That said, I apprecia…
/r/MensRights06/09/15 05:23 PM
–

I'm not lumping anything. I am asserting that they are already lumped, both by how womens studies/minority studies got started in Academia with sociology professors, with how the philosophies are based off of cultural marxism (a paradigm which I and many others soundly reject) how disciplines are grouped in universities, and the "intersectionality" of degrees. All women studies and minority studies are, are sub-branches of sociology, that have been allowed to dance off more fancifully than the o…
/r/MensRights06/09/15 06:11 AM
–

The "Social Sciences", and it's vocabulary, were built around the ideals of frued and marx, and their successors, such as the Frankfurt school, and are heavily influenced by the ideas of feminists, and other cultural marxists. Most studies in the "social sciences" have not been verified by replication. Those where replication are attempted often fail to replicate the original results. Even studies that have been repeatedly debunked are still taught as fact. "Womens Studies" and "Black Studies" a…
/r/MensRights06/09/15 02:36 AM
–

It would be more accurate to say that a large number of people in society, including in this sub say "Fuck social 'sciences' that's not real science". Posts and comments that draw on biology, physics, discuss the nature of statistics and how to set up good studies vs how to set up bad studies, etc, tend to be welcomed. You see a lot of talk about physical variance, and how it explains for both more genius men, and more men that have physical defects retarding their intellectual development. That…
/r/MensRights06/09/15 12:19 AM
1

Personally, I'd shove at the moment of attempt to force making out. Definitely enough to clear at least a few feet between us. Depending on her balance, she might hit the floor. Then again, I'm not into this kind of scene, and all my friends are aware, at least generally, of my defensive philosophy. "I will try to avoid being attacked. If I am attacked, I will do what I need to to end the attack." That philosophy is a part of why I avoid a number of different scenes.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 06:05 PM
1

That really stinks man. I'm sorry for what happened to you. The only time something similar happened to me, the girl took a polite no, as no.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 06:03 PM
1

I may look into it, thank you.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/15 05:15 PM
7

There is nothing 'reverse' about anti-male discrimination.
/r/MensRights05/09/15 04:59 PM
1

Good show. Thank you for making the correction.
/r/MGTOW05/09/15 08:29 AM
1

Ahhhh yes. "Old = evil" is a rule of the SJW. That is a decent counterpoint.
/r/TheRedPill05/09/15 07:22 AM
4

o.O Wait, the same people who scream their heads off at you for disliking affirmative action are against 'the white man's burden' as a concept? They're made of the freaking stuff.
/r/TheRedPill04/09/15 09:36 PM
2

Downvoted for giving link-juice to hate.
/r/MensRights04/09/15 07:33 PM
1

It's very similar to how boys are far more likely to want to treat any random play object as a "weapon" than girls are, even from a very young age. It's just another example of the play-hunt and play-combat that other species experience, most often in the hunting/combative members of the species. Even now, and in the future, men are the ones to face the harshest conditions of war, domestic unrest, and crime, and will continue to be so. We are also less likely than woman to receive sympathy for i…
/r/MensRights01/09/15 11:28 PM
–

As someone who was tortured over the thought that I had been born as the wrong sex for a time, the main reason was the abuse and exclusion of young men I was experiencing at the time. While I can be stern, I am generally a very compassionate person, which we are told all the time is a female trait. I also believed, at the time, the idea that guys as a whole were crude. I also did not understand how hazing or 'toughening' behavior could come from a place of honest love (it's just more of a tradit…
/r/MensRights01/09/15 09:08 PM
3

I would be more okay with this if the law applied to any sperm donated after that time, and men donating had to be made aware of the change. Retroactively pulling the rug out from under guys who donated in the year 2000, who's sperm gets used in 2004 is not cool.
/r/MensRights01/09/15 04:27 AM
2

Given that "child pornography" can often mean "pictures of 17 year old young women and young men" which were originally created from those individuals sexualizing themselves to feel sexy, and that you've got cases of 17 year olds "molesting" each-other and taking pictures for their own enjoyment, I can't agree. They're in the same developmental stage as 18 year olds, so the 18 year old dividing line is completely arbitrary. Those that abuse 6-year olds sexually? Sure, yeah, bad people. Lock them…
/r/MGTOW31/08/15 09:56 PM
1

You also.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 09:48 PM
–

And we're back to SJWs always lie, and the doubling down.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 09:33 PM
–

Actually, one of the biggest weapons that both traditionalists and feminists have in their arsenal is shaming language. "Peter pan man boy", "misogynist", "don't be that guy", etc. But when everyone is using shaming language left and right, and you recognize that, all it tends to do any more is tick you off, if that. "Sunshine" is annother perfect example. You're trying to make yourself look all tough on the internet, by 'speaking from a position of power' that you can only establish by demeanin…
/r/MensRights29/08/15 07:46 PM
–

No, it's not. And even if it were, that's still not being manipulative, which was your original attempt at shaming language. Further, not having respect for something, and actively shaming it are two different things, which you are falsely conflating, in your attempt to save face after being called on your fallacious bull. That is manipulative.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 06:02 PM
–

How does choosing to extract yourself from the bullshit of modern feminist-steeped life as much as you can and refusing to follow scripts others try to manipulate you into count as manipulating others in a demeaning way? Does it degrade others for me to choose to work on loosing weight by going on hikes in the woods, instead of spending my time and money on a dinner with someone I don't want to spend time with? If the above don't smack you as being manipulative, then stop with the MGTOW shaming.
/r/MensRights29/08/15 04:33 AM
1

Right. Because listening to someone complain about the mean office girl in Japanese is so much more interesting than in English. If I'm going to learn through immersion, why wouldn't I be doing it studying Akido, or working at Nintendo? Examples are keeping it inside the learning Japanese paradigm. There's other examples for Chinese, Spanish, German, etc. Seriously, girls just aren't worth spending my time, even before we get into risk management. And again, if I want a physical release for stre…
/r/TheRedPill28/08/15 06:37 PM
1

I don't think it'll be just deserts until the next revolution. Unfortunately, I think it'll be closer to the French, than the American revolution. There is a degraded sense of community, and an increased sense of animus. There already are killings between racial groups, interest groups, etc. People are killing cops simply because they are cops. People want to kill lawyers and bankers and politicians, for no other reason than their profesion. And I can't say I blame them. I don't see a society bu…
/r/TheRedPill28/08/15 07:13 AM
1

Okay. So explain to me why a self-motivated bicycle would want a fish gumming up it's gears? Seriously, masturbation sates all sexual needs, and I'm working on self improvement for my own self. Perhaps I was not clear. Access to sex with a woman who was a virign before I married her, and who will be a helpmet to me are non-negotiable requirements for me to be able to giveafuq about having a relationship with a woman. Otherwise, they're just not worth putting my dick in, or spending time with. I'…
/r/TheRedPill28/08/15 07:00 AM
3

Highly educational video, on this topic. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc
/r/TheRedPill28/08/15 05:55 AM
9

Because it's the very badly written law, and all cops know before they even get through their probie year that their job is going to be enforcing these badly written unjust laws. If they refused to enforce an unjust law (let alone all the unconstitutional ones), they wouldn't make it through the probie year. The police are not your friend. They are a weapon used by society. Sometimes they are a weapon you can use, sometimes they are a weapon used against you. And yes, if someone was trying to br…
/r/TheRedPill28/08/15 05:27 AM
6

First off, it really stinks what you went through. I'm sorry to hear that. That said, it could have been way way worse. You could have wound up not finding out about her until it was too late, and you were on the hook for some other guy's kid. You got out, which is a lot better than what has happened to a lot of other guys in the manosphere.
/r/MGTOW28/08/15 05:17 AM
2

One of the reasons I am MGTOW is that both sex and a helpmet that adds value are non-negotiable requirements. Neither is reasonably assured in marriage or an LTR any more, even if you think you've found a unicorn. Marriage actually decreases both value and sex. Therefore, not interested.
/r/TheRedPill28/08/15 03:35 AM
3

Most people that beat up men on behalf of women are men. That's a far cry from showing that the act of beating up men for women is anti-woman and pro-man.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 04:01 PM
3

ESPN doesn't even remotely favor men any more either. They're all about breast cancer month, and the NFL having pink headbands, but during men's health month or movember.... crickets. An athlete and someone they're involved with get in a fight? They take the side of the female, be she the athlete or the non-athlete.
/r/MensRights27/08/15 03:59 PM
11

So... the rise of mass produced food, as a result of feminists kicking women out of the kitchen... is now being blamed on men, and feminism is "the solution" to other problems it created. sigh
/r/MensRights26/08/15 04:34 PM
4

Notice how anything about the children is listed last.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 01:16 PM
2

Now do be fair, some call for the exclusion from society of penises of different colors also.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 01:09 PM
5

A rolling feminist bladder-stone gathers no readers.
/r/MensRights26/08/15 01:07 PM
12

The terrorist is the family member whose moods reign supreme in the family, whose whims and actions determine the emotional climate of the household. I react with disgust any time someone pretends that "If momma ain't happy ain't no-one happy" is some kind of genuine home spun wisdom, that you single-youngin's just don't understand yet.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 11:03 PM
3

You mean like Vox Day, the native american, who they campaigned to no-award? Or are Native Americans somehow one of the minorities that was never oppressed in the United States, and thus are to be as ineligible for the oppression olympics as whites supposedly are? So. Totally. Transparent.
/r/MensRights24/08/15 10:51 PM
2

"I was raped!" "You are lying, or exaggerating. Have a cookie and go away."
/r/MensRights24/08/15 10:37 PM
–

Rape fantasys are extremely common for women, and extremely rare for men. I think she's projecting her rape fantasys onto everyone else, and was just there to titillate herself. At this point, any time I hear a feminist talk about rape I presume she's either a lesbian who thinks all male sex is rape, a rape-fantasist, or just generally insane or deluded in some other way that is harmful to others. When it's a guy saying stuff like that? Then it just gets weirder and creepier. I mean... if a guy …
/r/MensRights24/08/15 10:34 PM
4

Until one of those men, particularly a highly placed one, has several daughters, and decides to prioritize their well being over that of society as a whole.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 01:08 PM
1

The words of Solomon, most wise of the ancient Kings of the Jews: Ecclesiastes 1 New American Standard Bible (NASB) The Futility of All Endeavor 1 The words of the Preacher, the son of David, king in Jerusalem. 2 “[a]Vanity of vanities,” says the Preacher, “[b]Vanity of vanities! All is [c]vanity.” 3 What advantage does man have in all his work Which he does under the sun? 4 A generation goes and a generation comes, But the earth [d]remains forever. 5 Also, the sun rises and the sun sets; And [e…
/r/MGTOW23/08/15 08:44 AM
2

Most professional level jobs that provide enough to live on comfortably if working part time... ... ... don't offer part time options... unless you say you're a woman who says she wants to spend time on her children. Only part-time programmers I've ever seen, really, and at the same employers I asked about part-time options.
/r/MGTOW23/08/15 08:35 AM
5

We're talking about the entirely post-modern concept that "a drunk person (who got drunk to lower inhibitions in the first place) cannot effectively consent to sex", which logically means that both people raped each-other, really. Of course practically speaking it means "BURN THE MAN!"
/r/MensRights23/08/15 08:30 AM
1

Try just not taking the damned thing. This works fairly often.
/r/MensRights23/08/15 08:29 AM
1

Well I think you're incorrect, but it's hardly sexist either way. The reason I think you're incorrect? Cops tend to be very controlling, and prone to violence. Households involving one or more members of the police tend to be far more prone to domestic violence, and divorce. A child coming from a home involving divorce, or domestic violence is more likely to act out in dangerous ways. Whether that is to physically abuse the partner, engage in controlling behavior, discount the value of the feeli…
/r/MGTOW21/08/15 04:39 AM
7

Actually, if a guy screams a lot, particularly if he is ugly and very unpopular with a large segment of people, one of the most common things to do is to associate him with domestic abuse. Except then the abuse isn't treated as funny. Bill is afraid of Hillary? Wah wah wah waaaahhhhhh. Woman X is afraid of man x? THE MONSTER! Here, 'the press' gets to demean two people at once, and pass it off as 'a joke'. Heck, even if a guy doesn't yell a lot, it's a part of the standard repertoire of shaming …
/r/MensRights20/08/15 10:31 PM
2

So long as we have a Violence Against Women Act as the main domestic battery law, and the Deluth model of domestic violence is in place among those in charge of deciding who is the abuser and who is the abused, the change is not "big enough".
/r/MensRights19/08/15 08:38 AM
–

It's expected, really, and comes up repeatedly. There are postors for hotlines, and the hotlines for men are for men who suspect they may be batterers. I looked into some volunteer work, and talked to a woman from a woman's shelter. When I brought up the 70% of non-reciprocal violence stat in conversation with her, she immediately challenged with the idea that "well much of the time a woman 'knows' domestic violence is coming, and so will start it on her own terms by attacking the man." ... ... …
/r/MensRights19/08/15 08:35 AM
12

Being a techie, who likes not having his searches tracked, I prefer DuckDuckGo.
/r/TheRedPill19/08/15 07:23 AM
–

Pardon. I was grabbing the op text to reply to someone else, and hit reply on the wrong comment in my list. That was my error.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 03:14 AM
–

From the OP. We were told that if the husband asks, "Is this child mine?" the correct course of action is to change the topic. If that doesn't work, the ethicist impressed on us that we hold no legal liability if we blatantly lie to the husband. In fact, she basically ENCOURAGED us to do so. OP said that they were encouraged to lie. i.e. the doctor should say "Yes, the child is yours" if changing the topic does not work. That is the explicit lying being referred to here.
/r/MensRights19/08/15 03:05 AM
–

So are you defending the panopitcon, or using the panopticon to defend this camera?
/r/MensRights18/08/15 09:44 PM
1

In the circumstance where we're looking at after-birth treatment, you'd think it'd be clear-cut that any info about the child (such as 'is this my child') would be something any guardian is allowed access to.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 09:43 PM
–

But lying to protect confidentiality, as the "ethicist" advised, is still lying, even if you believe confidentiality applies here.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 09:40 PM
–

A human that is property. I thought slavery was illegal in most of the civilized world.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 09:35 PM
–

Lovely, the law is constructed and twisted in such a way as to only allow disclosure once other laws make it to late. Bravo. And as a bonus, the legal jiggery-pokery involves denying the humanity of certain human beings, at least when it comes to legal status.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 09:35 PM
4

Part of the problem here is that the child is actually the patient being screened here, and any parent is entitled to information about his or her own child. The standard of "sole patient" creates this oddity. If a man who will have responsibility over the child when he or she is born asks questions about the tests, he is entitled to information about that child. Now, since he is not actually the father, that does get a bit more murky about other info, particularly if he is going to disavow the …
/r/MensRights18/08/15 09:30 PM
3

So... by the same logic, if you don't want to pick up the check on your first date with a guy, you're not interested enough in the relationship to meet your own criteria, and a guy would be 100% reasonable in thinking you would approach the relationship in far to tepid a way.
/r/MensRights18/08/15 03:05 AM
1

Given that I acknowledged your point about the brain, agreed that changes in the brain happen at many stages in life, and worked that into my argument... your claim that science refutes my arguments is full of fail, and further shows your inability to make an argument one way or the other in this case. This is particularly so given that we are both saying that the current age of 18 is arbitrary, but you can't seem to grasp that fact that we agree on something you are trying to browbeat me over. …
/r/MensRights18/08/15 02:20 AM
7

Not really. Chivalry started out as a warrior code, similar in many ways to Bushido (the way of the warrior) from Japan, one of many similarities between the feudal cultures of Western Europe and Japan during their Feudal periods. These can be seen in the oaths of Knighthood as they existed over the years, or in the Song of Roland. At first, deference to women only applied to those of the same noble class, and was a form of respect to one's fellow warriors. The protection and gentle behavior kni…
/r/MensRights16/08/15 12:06 PM
1

Possibly harder on the body.
/r/MensRights16/08/15 11:52 AM
1

How about the continual banning of men who defend themselves against domestic abuse? It's worse for those men, and for the men who were fans of that team. What about the discussions of NFL game night leading to men beating their wives, and all the talking heads discussing it? What about the continual entryism regarding sponsoring female sports teams off of the backs of the mens sports teams? What of the Susan G. Komen pink-washing?
/r/MensRights14/08/15 10:25 PM
–

Then you haven't been paying attention to this forum very long, have you?
/r/MensRights14/08/15 09:58 PM
1

meh, the only reason i'd ever get married at this point would be to get foreign citizenship. Any particular countries you're eyeing?
/r/MGTOW14/08/15 06:54 AM
2

There are a large number of family members I just won't hang out with unless they happen to be around when I am spending time with family members I do enjoy being around. This includes I've also made it clear that I don't care to be around them, and my mother actually warns me when making plans if my step-sisters may be around, so I can change my plans to avoid her. Unfortunately, I'm one of the best members of my family at planning, and various people just drop by with no warning at all. So I g…
/r/MGTOW14/08/15 06:43 AM
1

Have a good night.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 06:35 AM
–

Entryism. Feminists weezel their way in, then manage these issues to the betterment of women to the detriment of men.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 06:19 AM
2

I thought you were done.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 06:09 AM
–

Something, minus it's core elements, really isn't anything. And if you refuse to learn, then yes, we have reached an impasse. I hope that you will come to learn in time. And hopefully the process will be less personally painful for you than for many others before you.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 06:04 AM
–

Or worse, they actively stand in the way of improvements for men. Worse still, they actively make things worse.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 05:50 AM
–

No. I think of it as it exists, in the context of it's historical roots, the actions of feminists, the results of feminism (such as the largest feminist organization, NOW, fighting for VAWA and the Deluth model, and against domestic violence shelters for men), and the writing of feminists who get tenure for their man-hating 'contributions' to academia. Patriarchy theory (a branch of critical theory) is inherent to the core of feminism, and any ideology with that at it's core can be nothing but m…
/r/MensRights14/08/15 05:33 AM
–

Being stupid in one subject matter doesn't make one stupid in all. This is a true statement. If you are incompetent at using a pistol, that does not mean you are incompetent at baking a cake. However, your application of the statement is erroneous. In modern conception, the ability to consent is derived from general maturity, and awareness about yourself and the human condition, in particular regarding sexuality. By your own admission, you lack the requisite understanding in this area... which i…
/r/MensRights14/08/15 05:29 AM
–

Yyyno. Feminism has it's root in the works of marx, through the frankfurt school which synthesized his works, with those of freud. They recast the class struggle of one of males vs females, painting "the patriarchy" as the oppressor. And since the beginning of feminism, it at best ignores the issues of men, including having fewer rights than women in some ways. At worst, it worsens this situation for men, and actively fights any attempt to address these issues. No matter how many times you try t…
/r/MensRights14/08/15 05:15 AM
–

If you hated misandry and misogyny, you would hate feminism.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 05:00 AM
–

No, you stated, and are still stating, the marketing for the movement. Marketing which got codified in a dictionary. As the tactic book says for all statists descending in philosophy from Marx: 'repeat a lie often enough, and people will think it's the truth'.
/r/MensRights14/08/15 04:59 AM
–

"The sun revolves around the flat earth, why can't some people understand that?!?" Sob, fall on feinting couch
/r/MensRights14/08/15 12:32 AM
0

Then they'd stop being donkey-headed individuals that tell their clients to drag innocent people through the courts?
/r/MensRights12/08/15 01:18 AM
1

I've been to a few of them, and no strippers were included in the first place.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 06:35 PM
0

Just because they say they've abolished it, doesn't mean they have (politicians and judges always lie). The rules still exist for commingled assets, and cohabitation in many locations.
/r/TheRedPill09/08/15 06:05 PM
1

I believe you have made an incorrect transference. While traditionally, a man had to marry a woman to have sex with her, marrying a woman and having sex with her are no longer synonymous.
/r/TheRedPill09/08/15 05:58 PM
2

Well for one thing, a lot of the standards in other countries exist for good reasons, and if this woman is trying to give more to women, without considering what the men in those countries suffer through, she's already not "a good person". Personally, I refuse to give to female-centric charities, because so much money gets funneled that way already. Particularly if she has tried, or still is trying, to use public funds, which by necessity must be taken from those who pay taxes.
/r/MensRights09/08/15 05:12 PM
1

The Alternative Vote
/r/TheRedPill08/08/15 01:27 AM
3

According to the constitution? No. According to practice? What do you think regulations under the executive branch are? The EPA just came out with regulations, on Obama's behalf, that drastically change the legal landscape for the energy industry. Then there were the executive order delays in implementation of Obamacare. And what of his unilateral action on so-called "dreamers"?
/r/TheRedPill08/08/15 01:23 AM
1

Glad I could help.
/r/MensRights08/08/15 12:15 AM
–

The second phrase you used is a very common but misused phrase. From http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/bill_of_rights.html Amendment I Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances. Note that this amendment prevents congress from making laws regarding religion. In a…
/r/MensRights07/08/15 11:31 PM
1

Sort of like Desdemona (Othello's wife)? Then there's Desdemona from the series Gargoyles as well. Of similar bent from the same series is Titania.
/r/TheRedPill06/08/15 02:44 PM
3

Fair point.
/r/MGTOW06/08/15 06:27 AM
2

I dumped out after the first slide. She's not an engineer. She's not a scientist. She's not presenting years of research. By her own admission. And on top of that, she claims her world is pictures of "hot girls having sex", when there wasn't a single quality image of a hot girl on that entire slide meant to prove her bone fides. She has no qualification, TED talk over. I nearly dumped out when I saw it was associated with TED.
/r/MGTOW06/08/15 04:13 AM
1

The video that has even softcore, and enough plot to hold attention is rather rare. One of the few I'm aware of can be found here, and it's an anime: http://www.crunchyroll.com/monster-musume-everyday-life-with-monster-girls
/r/MGTOW06/08/15 04:03 AM
1

We hear a lot from "Therapists" huh?
/r/MGTOW06/08/15 03:42 AM
2

And in some ways more than others. How much they'll pay for college is one way. Another I keep encountering is self defense training. I keep hearing fathers talk about being proud that they paid for their daughters self defense training. "And did you do the same for your sons?" "Well, no. I figured he could take care of himself." "Men are both more likely to be attacked and more likely to be injured than women. If you had to pick someone to have trained in self defense, it should have been your …
/r/MGTOW06/08/15 03:20 AM
2

I dunno. The crowd that reads pro-communist works, pushes for more laws, and then at the same time tells me that I need to be less concerned with following those laws tends to be mostly white, and disproportionately live in urban high-rises, studio-apartments, etc. These also tend to be the outside agitators that flock to other communities like Ferguson and cause trouble. Many of them are college professors. In my assessment, these folks are more likely to commit a wide variety of crimes than a …
/r/MensRights05/08/15 09:36 PM
1

Why on earth would I want to put my cock in crazy?
/r/TheRedPill05/08/15 01:17 AM
2

Well, if you don't want to listen, or discuss, that's your call. Just don't derail and shut down discussion.
/r/MensRights04/08/15 08:39 PM
–

Capitalism, simply, is a system whereby trade is enabled by the use of some agreed on currency. There is no "capitalist class" and "non-capitalist" class. Rather, every freeman has as a part of that freedom the ability to trade goods and services for currency, and currency for goods and services, and to directly own goods, and the product of the labor they perform on the goods they own. If you have someone with labor, and someone else with goods with which, and on which, to perform labor, then t…
/r/MensRights04/08/15 05:40 PM
6

And yet things like immunity to the draft continued to favor women. Men remained financially responsible for children, but women gained control over those children. Men remained financially responsible for their wives through alimony, even though the women did not retain their responsibilities toward their husbands after the divorce. Similarly, the deluth model of domestic violence was enshrined in several levels of federal through local law, both through text (VAWA) and custom of ruling (judici…
/r/MensRights03/08/15 10:27 PM
2

"What kind of creepy guy would do that? Obviously he forced her to stamp so he would have an excuse to rape her." Never mind that consent can be revoked in the middle of the act, and does not require the woman to say "no" to revoke her consent, meaning that through no conscious act or decision of his own the "guilty penis" becomes a "rapist". sigh
/r/MensRights02/08/15 09:34 PM
2

As a note? That's hardly an actually traditional view. I realize that some people call themselves traditionalists and try to justify that kind of drek. I call them out on how non-traditional that position really is.
/r/MGTOW02/08/15 05:37 PM
1

This presumes you can find a job as an actual engineer, and it's somehow not for the government or a major corporation. I went to school when there was a supposed derth of engineers, and could not find a job in my original field. I now put up with 7-8 hours of paperwork a day to occasionally make a change to a database.
/r/MGTOW02/08/15 05:35 PM
6

"Happy wife, happy life." "If momma ain't happy, ain't no one happy." "I don't know why she puts up with me." "My better half." Victorian world view in a nutshell.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 05:25 PM
9

You asked a question. He gave an answer, and a reason for his answer. Whether or not his points address yours directly, that does not make his argument a "straw man". A "straw man" is where he sets up a pretend version of your argument, which is not your actual argument, and attacks it, as a proxy for your argument.
/r/MensRights02/08/15 02:05 AM
–

If you're a teen who is close to the age of consent, and by your own stance, you are too stupid to consent, then why should we trust you not to be too stupid on teens in general? Historically speaking, 13 was the age of adulthood in a huge number of societies. Heck, 10 year olds served as officers in the military. George Washington had a job as a surveyor at age 15. If a young man could be an adult, married, and (if need be, because his father died), head of household at 13, that does not indica…
/r/MensRights01/08/15 03:33 AM
7

I still don't see why I should listen to her, out of either sex. As a rule, I just skip these self-important articles.
/r/MensRights31/07/15 07:05 PM
-3

Why are you using quotes around feminist when discussing what you call feminist propaganda? Feminism has all kinds of propaganda. You seem to presume that there is some kind of "Real feminism" distinct from negative propaganda. As for the article itself... I agree that they should give the estimated number of homeless women. It would give an accurate description of how many are "in need" of this service. People generally tend to presume that there is a large proportion of homeless women than the…
/r/MensRights31/07/15 03:19 PM
1

I guess that shows what I know about using drugs. :P
/r/MensRights29/07/15 04:38 PM
–

I agree that the timeframes involved are important. First of all, it is my understanding that qualitudes were one of the popular drugs to abuse at that time, and that the initial accuser admits to requesting said drug. That strikes me as no more suspicious than having opium, codine, or morphine available when they were popular and abused. If laughing gas (which when used in higher degrees causes sleep as well) was easily portable, I would put that in the same category. Similarly, alcohol is a de…
/r/MensRights28/07/15 07:18 PM
–

The idea of an explicitly agreed to contract of marriage is not bad. However, false security is worse security than none. This is a truism in any security field. A contract that you cannot enforce is a kind of false security.
/r/MensRights28/07/15 12:49 AM
1

The attitudes he takes, though, can have an effect on the next election he won't be in, as well as bargain making for the remainder of what he is seeking to make his legacy.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 11:36 PM
–

There's a lot of reasons for me to dislike the man in general -- but credit where credit is due. "or a man", and "without his or her knowledge" are both very good, particularly compared with most feminists. But, yeah, like you said, let's wait for the backlash to a reasonable statement like this or "all lives matter" and see how far he walks it back.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 11:28 PM
–

If you're comparing apples to apples? Maybe. If you're comparing joe normal to a famous person where loads of people would like a part of that pie (monetary or recognition wise), or would just like the rush of power from taking a man down? Not necessarily.
/r/MensRights27/07/15 11:19 PM
2

There are also cases where violence is entirely reasonable. For example, when someone assaults a woman, people keep asking why there wasn't a man around to be violent on her behalf to save her from the other violence. They just don't put it that way.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 03:04 PM
10

Or, in this case, get dumb women who enjoy being re-affirmed to buy shoes.
/r/MensRights26/07/15 06:25 AM
1

Rule 1 in improving a civilization you are a part of: Improve yourself. Become physically fit. This will pay both health and social dividends, and generally make everything else easier. Become generally well read. In particular study scripture if you have faith. Also read the works of shakespere, and major philosophers, and learn statistics (so that you can spot a BS study when you read a summary of it, if nothing else). There's a manosphere regular who has compiled a list of great books for men…
/r/TheRedPill25/07/15 05:22 PM
1

She can if she's a prison guard in a male prison.
/r/MensRights25/07/15 04:00 PM
1

https://youtu.be/3Y3jE3B8HsE
/r/MensRights25/07/15 03:52 PM
2

I'm aware that there are certain areas of politics where some factions in the republican party hold common issues with men (and the manosphere in general). Given just how much feminism pervades the Democrat party, it's easy to mentally pull an "enemy of my enemy" and presume that Republicans would be for men. However, there are three issues with the idea of the Republican party as the "party of men": stated goals/nature/branding, actual legal acts, and the problem of adopting the above branding.…
/r/MensRights20/07/15 03:43 AM
–

Got a reference for where it ever said it tried to be?
/r/MensRights19/07/15 03:08 AM
6

The one that you keep hearing about in the media, and political speeches. It's rather like a unicorn. You hear about it, but you never actually see one unless it's been faked.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 04:26 PM
1

looks it up yeah. I've heard enough about it, seen enough clips, I'm sure I don't want to see it.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 02:45 PM
1

Never saw it.
/r/MensRights18/07/15 02:36 PM
–

So... trolling?
/r/MensRights16/07/15 12:30 AM
–

You have officially boggled me.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 05:01 AM
–

... Watch this, then get back to me.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 03:49 AM
–

Hey, if people get to ignore that, then we get to ignore daredevil, the green lantern movie, all of the hulk movies (ever), the 19...80s... was it.. Cpt. America... pretty much anything before the modern crop, basically. Possibly with the exception of the first two Christopher Reeve movies.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 03:19 AM
1

Reproduction is not a fundamental right. In this context, that of so called "positive rights", where you supposedly have the right to make others do something for you, I agree. In the context of so called "negative rights", where I have the right for you not to do something to me, I disagree. Humans have fundamental rights to bodily autonomy. For example, I am not allowed to kill you, maim you, assault you, kidnap you, etc. This is a so called "negative right". This is the format of a right to s…
/r/MensRights15/07/15 03:02 AM
1

Actually, if you go by the definition of "making a decision based on sex" then yes, it is sexism. It's proper sexism of the same sort as using risk pools for insurance, or choosing to have Othello played by a black guy, instead of a white chick.
/r/MensRights15/07/15 02:40 AM
2

It's not the women's movement we need. It's the one we deserve to want to think about to throw up on.
/r/MensRights08/07/15 06:45 AM
6

They know, intrinsically, that this is a symptom of a larger problem. They just rationalize away what it is. The men in those situations do not 'contribute' to the communities in ways that have been expected. Married men (particularly with children) make more than single men, not because they experience a benefit, but because they have costs to cover. These men also tend to volunteer their time less to various 'charitable' organizations like the Boyscouts, VFW, etc. All of this is 'lost labor' t…
/r/MensRights08/07/15 06:34 AM
0

So, then, because equality, it'd also be against their code of conduct for women to defend themselves against men who are harming them, right? I can read the headlines now. "FSU is pro-rape!"
/r/TheRedPill07/07/15 10:45 PM
1

This is part of why I train in control techniques (like the arm grab the guy tried at first, though that's not a very good one). Will I still get guff for defending myself? Yes. Will it be as much guff? Historically, no. Will I always be able to use control techniques instead of blocks, strikes, or throws? No. Still, it's another useful tool in the arsenal. Of course, in a crowded bar situation like that, you pretty much have to assume that people will come to the aid of a woman, even if she's i…
/r/TheRedPill07/07/15 10:43 PM
–

Actually, ignorance of the law totally is an excuse, in the case of laws that are malum prohibitatum (bad because we say they are) that have not yet chucked the traditional "mens rea" component. That is, to be guilty, you have to have knowingly and intentionally broken the law. The growing lack of mens rea provisions is a major problem in the growing cannon of US 'law', much of which is created by regulators. Restoring mens rea protections is one of the major areas being worked on by legal refor…
/r/MensRights05/07/15 05:40 AM
–

Men is also made of massage-o-knee. Make good iron massuse. Iz why all men should be locked up to give wumuns pla.. platon... not-is-sex type rub.
/r/MensRights01/07/15 09:28 PM
1

Now maybe I could have phrased it differently, so you wouldn't feel like I was calling you out individually. But if you participate in a discussion about possible forum posting rules, a reply regarding ways of posting is just part of the discussion.
/r/MensRights29/06/15 01:51 AM
–

And what's even dumber is that the only practical alternative would get their panties in even more of a knot. The signs often show men with larger arms and shoulders, for helpful emphasis of their physical characteristics. Meanwhile, absent a clothing-queue, women would be shown with hourglass figures, or from the side with noticeable breasts and butts. "Oh no, the body shaming. Now fat women are being told not to use the restroom because they eat too much!"
/r/MensRights28/06/15 10:29 PM
–

You could still post links to third party archive sites. This would have the additional benefit of retaining content that the site changes, or takes down, in it's original form.
/r/MensRights28/06/15 10:25 PM
1

Takes two to tango, and she was obviously interested.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/15 02:35 PM
10

I'm going to point out that you can unconditionally love someone without wanting this for them. Typically, a parent will have near unconditional love for their children, but that manifests as wanting the best for them. And no, that doesn't mean the best cake right in the moment, it means the best long-term life. It also means them becoming a stable, mature adult. Typically it also involves being a devote follower of God, "one with nature", "enlightened", or whatever the parents genuinely believe…
/r/TheRedPill27/06/15 02:31 PM
3

From what I've read, in some cases, it's actually a fetish. He may well have had cameras, and would have wanked to it later, and was pissed at you for denying him wank material. Or, like you said, he could have been ticked at you because now he had to deal with her being ticked all night. Always remember the adage. No matter how hot a woman is, somewhere there is a man who is tired of dealing with her issues.
/r/TheRedPill27/06/15 02:27 PM
2

Actually, I think Step 1, particularly at the moment, is to get some good, restful sleep. But yeah, step 2 is to get out of the house, and hit the trails, etc more often (and take some of the junk I don't need out with me and throw it away, or give it away). Night.
/r/MGTOW27/06/15 06:58 AM
–

Well, if you actually ask like you want to know, I'll tell you. If you just want to hurl insults, I'll bounce back ones on about the same intellectual level, while declining to swear. "You have smelly breath."
/r/MensRights27/06/15 02:35 AM
1

Either it's just a physical quality, or not. I'll address each separately below. If it's really just a physical quality, why are you ascribing "their views"? Why would someone with a beard on his neck that stops ascribing to traditional values not be a neckbeard? Why would a clean shaven man with traditional values be a neckbeard? I've seen quite a few hipsters that don't shave their necks because they like the look who are very "progressive" in many of their attitudes. If it's not just a physic…
/r/MensRights27/06/15 01:55 AM
–

Actually, the general use is to disparage and degrade men no matter what their physical appearance is. As an insult, it is roughly equivalent to claiming a guy has a small penis. It's rarely used literally. It's just a form of shaming that can only apply to a man.
/r/MensRights27/06/15 01:33 AM
–

Regarding "Neckbeard": If you were black, how do you think you would feel about a black man sitting at the barber shop after his blue collar job got out saying "You know the real niggers are just the hood-rats. I'm a man of color, thank you very much." How well do you think it would work to get people to stop calling you, or him, a "nigger"? Don't continue an insult against you, just to re-direct it against another sub-group of men. I don't typically make tone arguments, but when something is bo…
/r/MensRights27/06/15 12:00 AM
0

Then why don't we see more people bandying about the debate between voting integrity and voting access? Or are mens rights only for non-voters? What about male "IP" owners who claim to have a right to control registered IP vs male engineers, inventors, and creators, who claim that the limitations on copyright to "a limited time" mean that they have a right to make new works based on existing "IP" within their lifetimes? The thing is that unlike divorce rape, parental alienation, and higher level…
/r/MensRights26/06/15 11:41 PM
–

The system has already been abused by divorce rape. Given the large number of existing changes to the marital contract, and recent changes to the laws on the books in the US, given the SCOTUS rulings, and the polyamory changes already in the pipe, I'm not sure how anyone can make a case against any particular use for marriage any more.
/r/MensRights26/06/15 11:38 PM
–

So now something that affects men and women in roughly the same way belongs on a mens rights forum?
/r/MensRights26/06/15 11:35 PM
3

They could just refuse you entry, particularly if they have any form of security.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 10:37 PM
4

Because an angry and spiteful woman's assessment of a particular guy is reliable info, eh?
/r/TheRedPill25/06/15 03:40 PM
–

While this might be an interesting discussion to hash out at a later date, I only meant to give an off hand comment and be done, due to other demands on my time and attention, as well as fatigue. I'm sure you'll understand and excuse my declination for further discussion on the subject.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 02:05 PM
1

As I said up above, SJWs always lie.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 01:44 PM
–

Actually, some in the west still hold that expectation, particularly in faith based communities. While some would call this horrible, it's not that unreasonable of an expectation to hold, so long as both parties agree at the outset of the contract and know what they're getting themselves in for. It's far better, at least, than the current feminist model. Either way, given the setup of the car-borrowing example in the quoted comment, it seems to me, that this is a relevant paradigm to bring up.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 01:40 PM
–

I didn't say "is" did I? Now, the person you contracted with to let you drive the car, in exchange for letting her stay at your flat gets to not only take back the car, but kick you out of the flat also, while you still have to pay rent on the flat.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 01:31 PM
1

Like I said, I'm done. I hope you have a good day.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 01:29 PM
1

Well for one thing, I gave one portion of my position on one point of data alone, to see if you could understand that one portion of the argument. And I said that, TWICE. You can't even understand my repeated definition of the scope of the information I was giving you. To quote Rush Hour, "Do you understand the words that are coming out of my mouth!?!" It's like you only see the sentences you want to see. Seriously, I'm done. This is explicitly not worth my time.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 12:53 PM
–

The only way you get to drive the car forever is if you have a contract to that effect, or you've bought it outright. In the sexual marketplace, that was traditionally known as one of the basic clauses of the marriage contract.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 12:49 PM
1

So like I said, I re-explained part of my position to see if we could actually have a worthwhile discussion without your badly misunderstanding things (purposefully or not), ascribing positions, jumping the gun, etc. So apparently we can't. At least you didn't engage in name calling in the portion of your post I bothered to read. Honestly, the only question I'm left with is... what is wrong with you? It's not even mockery at this point. All I feel is sorry for you.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 12:33 PM
1

Rather than ascribing me positions, you are now asking questions. Against my better judgement, I'll trust that you are genuinely asking, and see if we can get into a worthwhile conversation. Rather than address your earlier poor ascription of my position, I will re-state a portion of my position in a way that may help you understand it better. Blacks in America, as an example, were enslaved at particular points in history. Not all blacks were enslaved, and many blacks were owned by other blacks.…
/r/MensRights25/06/15 08:10 AM
1

You're not even close to what I described. Your real, or faked, inability to actually read even a summary of my position in previous posts is one of the reasons I see no reason to take you seriously.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 07:10 AM
1

You've not contributed substance to the discussion for the third post in a row. Yep. Already told you I wouldn't, and I was just going to practice poking at you, until you got your head out of your arse. You really aren't good at paying attention to what your conversant is saying. Actually deal with what I wrote up above instead of dismissing it, and contribute substance to the discussion yourself, and I'll consider reciprocating. Until then, all you deserve is razzing.
/r/MensRights25/06/15 05:01 AM
2

I don't know what else you want from me To be intellectually honest, and refrain from appeals to authority, ad hominim, and a host of other non-dialectic tactics, or admit that we're just exchanging rhetoric. Of course I'll never get that, because SJWs always lie. See below. There is no such thing as 'left-wing' academia
/r/MensRights24/06/15 09:51 PM
3

Uuug. There was a little girl from church who wore those stupid David and Goliath shirts (which her mother obviously got her) and while she ran up and hugged me, and wanted to race me when I raced her brother, etc, she would repeat the stupid memes. "Boys are stupid and we should throw rocks at them" and whenever i sternly corrected her, she got a huge grin on her face. sigh Her brother is the boy who had no male father figure, and actually wanted me to marry her mom because I was one of the few…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 01:34 PM
2

Yaknow, I can respect your work ethic in that situation, but I think I would have told her that while I'd love to fix her stuff, I wasn't interested in a hostile work environment, and that she could call me back to fix the camera when the sexist cop wasn't around. And no, i'm not just blustering, I've called out sexism against men at work, including reporting a policy that was violating itself to HR. Nothing was done about it of course buuut...
/r/MensRights24/06/15 01:27 PM
5

Then take the advice you ignored in another of my posts, and use sex neutral language from the start, rather than putting it all on men, as you have in multiple previous posts of your own.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 01:18 PM
2

I feel as if it is you who refuses to engage in dialectic debate Ahuh, feels before reals. Typical. There are left-wing ... academic At least you admit some of what you are. And given the large number of "facts" that are sourced in left-wing academia, such as "women had it far worse", the 4 in 5 rape myth, and the 77 cents on the dollar myth, your rhetorical appeal to authority falls flat even as rhetoric. you are buying into right-wing, reactionary rhetoric And more labeling and name calling. I…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 01:17 PM
7

You have attempted to pretend that men, as a subset of humanity, have not suffered a wide range of disadvantages, to distinguish them from other subsets, such as women, or various racial minorities. I have rebutted your claim. Even if you disagree with my success, I have obviously made the attempt. That's what it has to do with the discussion thus far. If you can't even understand that, I see no reason to engage you in a dialectic discussion. Rather, as you have already engaged in name calling, …
/r/MensRights24/06/15 06:12 AM
20

Yes and no. You can have genes that make it more likely to be fat, but if you're a starving serf you'll be thin. Where as if you're living in a land of plentiful and cheep hohos, you'll be a ham-planet. Nature and nurture both have an impact, and part of the genetic makeup of women is an inclination to seek to gather outside resources and provisioning through social structures, and institutions. That's true if the easiest way to this is it by marrying the chieftain as his 5th wife, marrying a be…
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 06:04 AM
0

Yes, but what of the horns? How can you be sure that these two female equines were indeed unicorns, if you can't tell us the physical qualities of their horns. They might be mystical illusions, or put on with glue. Also, from what you've posted I take it they speak? I thought that outside of children's cartoons they neighed.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 05:02 AM
2

Yes. I think that is a good idea. There are three underlying causes. An active campaigns of misinformation by feminists, which is an underlying cause of 2. Ignorance of the fact that most people that save others from violence are male, and that most men are going to be in the subset of protector, rather than the subset of aggressor, particularly if he views the women or children as being members of his "tribe". A species trait of physical dichotomy in which men have decided advantages over women…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 04:28 AM
7

enslaved and brought into poverty. Forced labor for the entirety of the serf class, the responsibility for which fell squarely on the man. Even outside the serf class, and more recently, we have the issues of men being responsible for paying tax on the income of the wife both in English common law, and to this day in Sharia -- income which he could not, or can not, touch. Further, there are presumed income levels ascribed to a man, which he must pay child support and alimony on, even after taxes…
/r/MensRights24/06/15 04:09 AM
5

All TV is a marketed product. For it to make money, it must play to the mores of the society it is in, while also feeling "different" or "edgy" enough to capture interest and market share compared with other programs. This one's "edgy" market share grabber is "nakedness" combined with "one man and one woman". As such, it maximizes profits by soothing the mores of the widest segment of the population it can, after having gotten it's "edgy" factor in place. The majority of society is made up of wo…
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 01:14 AM
3

As I recall, "passive aggressive" was a term invented to describe soldiers who knew what was what, and did just well enough to avoid being punished for disobeying orders, but made themselves mostly useless and avoided risking their lives whenever they could. I think it was invented during a time soldiers were still drafted.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 12:51 AM
1

"Awarded" makes it sounds like he didn't do anything to deserve it, and the congress was doing it for their own reasons. Though, given the ups and downs in the rate of given meddles... both compared to land seized, and deaths of us soldiers in ratios... and how often it's been used for political purposes... you might have a point.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 12:49 AM
1

You could also go to a dojo to get help in training your mind and body, if you need additional push.
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 12:47 AM
1

Do you have scientific documentation of the horn? Is it truly like that of the narwal? Is it closer to that of the ram?
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 12:40 AM
6

It also has the implication that the training is in some way false, or generally detrimental, as well as possibly removing something fundamental from the person who is so altered. Further, "training" has a positive connotation, implying legitimacy. "Torture" as practiced by forces such as the viet cong, to cause soldiers to turn against their home nation is also a form of "brainwashing". The tendency to medicate boys for being boys, and train them that all men are rapists, but you'd better not b…
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 12:37 AM
11

shit for producing human beings that will contribute to a society in any way other than murdering undesirables (hence a lot of them go into law enforcement post-military). This would go a long way to explain a lot of our problems with cops militarization, the tendency to order people around when a request would work, the police using military gear, and our trouble with removing old, dumb laws that are defended because they "give cops the tools needed to get evidence on worse scum".
/r/TheRedPill24/06/15 12:32 AM
–

"Feel" threatening to poorly raised children in our misandrist society? Yes. Actually be threatening to their safety and wellbeing? Perhaps. If he's a psychopath criminal. The same can be said of women.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 12:12 AM
5

Thus helping to further prove the point of the OP.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 12:10 AM
2

Even in areas it isn't upheld in the courts, punishment from the cops, and a bs charge that gets replaced with another bs charge like "resisting arrest" or "disturbing the peace" or the like can happen. Even if it doesn't stick, the arrest is itself the punishment.
/r/MensRights24/06/15 12:05 AM
1

Yes, and yes (if the venue is constructed for male-primary events, rather than a partially rented general-use venue).
/r/MensRights22/06/15 08:15 PM
2

I'd like to add that many suicides are over the break ups of families. As I recall (I'd have to dig up the stats or articles), there is a large spike in suicide after men are denied custody of their children, and men assigned large child support payments are more likely to commit suicide due to being financially pinned.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 08:01 AM
–

If they are multiple-stall spaces? I completely agree with you. Personally, if it's two one-person bathrooms, I'd rather just see both unisex, but if they also use the bathrooms as changing rooms in a female-clothing store... Eh. I am not a favor of the above arrangement ever, but there are circumstances I would be more permissive in than others.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 07:56 AM
1

This, I will upvote.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 07:43 AM
1

Welcome to one of several reasons I will never see a person trained in "psychology" of my own volition.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 07:41 AM
1

Yes, because removing one particular method of suicide reduces the total chance of suicides, including in those forms not traditionally measured due to difficulty of determining intent. /s What do you do when the top causes of suicide in an area are suicide by cop, suicide by bridges, and suicide by purposeful car crash? Counsel the people that need to drive over a bridge to get to the counseling office to reduce access to cops, cars, and bridges? How does one even "reduce access" to police? Hot…
/r/MensRights22/06/15 07:30 AM
–

Eh. I think it depends on the store. If this is inside a Victoria Secret store, I can see their favoring their clientel. Similarly, I would expect most sports stadiums, home improvement stores, etc, to have more male bathroom space. That second one is sadly an expectation that has been rebuffed more and more often these days.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 05:43 AM
1

It's entirely possible he was a widower.
/r/MGTOW22/06/15 05:24 AM
1

I simply point out that I believe what the bible says. Proverbs 29:9 It is better to live in a corner of a roof Than in a house shared with a contentious woman. Proverbs 29:19 It is better to live in a desert land Than with a contentious and vexing woman. 1 Corinthians 7:6-9 -- 6 But this I say by way of concession, not of command. 7 Yet I wish that all men were even as I myself am. However, each man has his own gift from God, one in this manner, and another in that. 8 But I say to the unmarried…
/r/MGTOW22/06/15 05:18 AM
6

Yaknow, I paused, and tried to think of if there was a way that this kind of poster is legitimate and reasonable in it's expression. But then I looked at the image of "Rosie", and noticed that they're not talking about uncles, or grandfathers, or any other group of men that move to help fill in the gap for a child who doesn't have access to his father (be this due to divorce, workplace death, military death, deployment, etc). So no, this really doesn't seem legitimate to me.
/r/MensRights22/06/15 04:36 AM
0

While your statement is true, it is disconnected from the context of the inter-locution thus far. Since you have failed the Turing test, I decline to continue the conversation.
/r/TheRedPill09/06/15 05:07 AM
1

He is a person who attempted to help me stop taking medication, and deal with withdrawal symptoms, and other issues with going off of medication you have been taking for a time, that affect your mental processes. How does it follow that he is a shill for the makers of that medication, when he is depriving the pharma-companies of a customer? How does he help them recover losses?
/r/TheRedPill08/06/15 06:07 AM
3

You are a pirate!
/r/MGTOW07/06/15 08:39 AM
22

Ah, yes, Japan. Where salary-men are paid back an allowance by their wives, and have to scrimp and save out of that, to be able to afford an hour at a hostess cafe to have a woman pay attention to him and pretend that she cares that he's alive. Where the wife cuts him off and expects him to support a mistress (without any reduction in her own money) once she's had all the children she wants. A place where they have a single-word name for working yourself to death, Kiroshi... which is a real nati…
/r/MGTOW07/06/15 08:28 AM
1

I do not see how that follows from my description, at all.
/r/TheRedPill07/06/15 03:34 AM
2

Like by changing my name to Jenny, and taking all the bennies meant for women? :P
/r/TheRedPill06/06/15 04:26 AM
1

You do realize that celibacy is a thing, right? Even more isolation from various forms of risk. There's also porn, and various toys, none of which are likely to sue you, or take half your stuff. You're also unlikely to get aids from your hand or a sterile inanimate object. As such, there is a far lower cost and more risk averse position than the one you propose that does not require one to be attracted to one's own sex. Further... whether you engage in heterosexual sex, homosexual sex, abstain e…
/r/TheRedPill06/06/15 04:25 AM
14

Limit child support to the amount the government pays foster children and one (or more) of two things will happen. A. The state will go bankrupt paying for the fostering system. B. Men won't get sucked dry by child support.
/r/TheRedPill05/06/15 06:01 AM
16

While I agree with that sentiment in the context of divorce, you do realize that those that have and desire power have helped to foster feminism in order to make it easier to get power by destroying the pre-existing systems. In the game of life, even if you don't get married, the laws are rigged, the taxes are rigged, the payouts are rigged. You do know that, right?
/r/TheRedPill05/06/15 05:58 AM
2

Thanks for the reminder. Night.
/r/TheRedPill04/06/15 03:57 AM
5

Psychiatrists have medical degrees and understand how the body affects the mind. I had one that helped me get off the pills the schools put me on, and part of his advice to help me through the withdrawal was magnesium, because it's a substance I've always been short on. He's the only head-shrink I look back on fondly. A psychiatrist could be a pill pusher, or he could be the guy that tells you what exercises to do and dietary supplements to take to not only feel great physically, but mentally as…
/r/TheRedPill04/06/15 03:33 AM
1

Since you seem incapable of following basic expansion on symbolic discussion, I'll break it down for you (and third parties that care to read it). In your original example, women are likened to a toddler throwing a tantrum. I added the concept of the use of the violence of the state to the discussion. This is most naturally represented by a firearm, a tool that the toddler does not fully understand the consequences of playing with, just as most people today do not fully understand the repercussi…
/r/MGTOW04/06/15 12:14 AM
2

Alcohol and fatigue impair function in similar ways. Slowed reaction time, decreased processing power, impaired judgement, physical clumsiness and slumped posture, droopy eyes. The conditions do present in very similar ways. Given that we know that men are not only more likely to drive as mentioned to others, but more likely to work long hours, and commute great distances, these would be interesting causes for false positives, raising the correlation above a neutral correlation. However, while c…
/r/MensRights04/06/15 12:06 AM
1

It's always been the main event gator, it always has been.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 11:59 PM
1

I've downvoted many of your other posts on this topic. I upvote this one to reward consistency, and following the same framework on questions people could easily take two sides on. Also, to reward bringing up information many people are unaware of.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 11:58 PM
0

http://www.kinseyinstitute.org/resources/FAQ.html#Age
/r/MGTOW03/06/15 08:47 AM
3

Oh, they have a sense of it. It's just horribly twisted and unrecognizeable when looked at strait on. I mean you wouldn't think http://images2.fanpop.com/images/photos/5900000/Gollum-smeagol-gollum-5995703-779-812.jpg was related to http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20070623123241/lotr/images/2/20/Sam.jpg now would you? But it's cannon that the two races are related. Nor http://exiledonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/08/orc.jpg to https://newstoriesoldbook.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/elves-lor…
/r/MensRights03/06/15 07:12 AM
1

manhood when the best response is to point out that why would men need to 'man up' for women that don't need no man? Stop caring what irrelevant people think, especially when their stupidity is the cause of their own complaint and not the result of anything you are or aren't doing. Literally go your own way, and that cannot happen without being prepared to transgress and reject social expectations. The second has decent enough odds at the present time if you live in the EU the US, or Baltic Stat…
/r/MGTOW03/06/15 07:02 AM
2

My main concern when it comes to this is when those messages reach impressionable youths, or when people are trying to use this rhetoric to bring the force of the state to bear.
/r/MGTOW03/06/15 07:00 AM
2

You're done? Okay, good. Have a good night framing things in PC language else-where.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 06:44 AM
–

It's your orwellian bullshit that makes you a PC concern troll. Female-only is "female-inclusive". Black knighting is "an immature decision that has severe societal and personal ramifications". Using the system as it's designed, rather than as intended by people that hate us, is being "a fuckwit" and "abusing" things that are actually abusive of societal good faith. If that's how you "fight for men's issues", I'd rather have you down range and pointed in my direction, than watching my back, than…
/r/MensRights03/06/15 06:36 AM
–

Ah yes. The woman strikes first, but the man that defends himself is the one "abusing". I thought pretty much everyone agreed that was bullshit. In the same way, refusing to be abused by PC BS is not, itself, abuse. Seriously, I thought that this kind of entryist concern trolling was against the sub's rules.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 05:48 AM
–

I hear Nebraska made it a constitutional Amendment. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nebraska_Initiative_424 <- wikipedia so take it with a grain of salt, but I remember reading a news article on it. Any other such states?
/r/MensRights03/06/15 05:39 AM
–

If you cower in fear of the displeasure of transexuals that'd make you transphobic, just as cowering in fear of the displeasure of cats makes you aluraphobic. Black knighting does not meet a rational definition of having a phobia of anything.
/r/MensRights03/06/15 05:29 AM
4

At least for american cruise ships, people are assigned seats on specific lifeboats, in order to ensure everyone can get off in an orderly fashion. It was also not a universal rule before that. However, the expectation that men give up their seats has been in place for a while, even if it is not policy. For example, in the most recent cruise ship disaster, the complaint "It wasn't women and children first" as an indictment was common. Similarly, in the "Batman" theater shooting, a man who escape…
/r/MensRights03/06/15 05:16 AM
–

Meh, I'm not planning on seeing it, even if it's free. I am so sick to death of unrealistic amazon characters that if some people say there's one in a movie, that movie goes off my list before I even bother watching it. At least with Anime everyone knows the whole thing is completely unreal. "I slice you with a sword as big as my body, while my chick-friend jumps 50 feet in the air to spear you with her lance!" Besides which, I hated all of Bay's movies, and other reviews make this sound like mo…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 01:31 PM
–

Particularly since repeated deployments of the military to fight asymmetric warfare against guerrilla forces caused the US military to dump programs designed to fight major power adversaries, right before we have a re-militarizing Russia on the world stage. Further, there are the large number of wounded or battle-weary troops, and America getting tired of paying for expeditionary wars like Iraq or Libya... and the attendant expenses. We've also worn down the national guard with repeated deployme…
/r/MensRights16/05/15 05:36 AM
2

Sounds to me like guys are giving them accurate feedback (young girls are hot), and the gals just can't understand the feedback. Much the same way that the nice guy who can't get dates/laid etc, doesn't understand the accurate feedback of "guys who are over-accommodating and can't pass a shit test aren't attractive". In each case, they prefer the lies that society tells, in part, because of existing sunk costs. Even a nice guy who'd rather be a ripped badass will find the societal lies about nic…
/r/TheRedPill27/04/15 04:50 AM
3

There are a fair number of men that don't shave for prolonged periods that many would find attractive, or worthy of emulation. Loggers, oil rig men, crabbers, etc. This indicates that it is an insult for the sake of being an insult, and only sticks around because it continues to have social force, for whatever reason. However, like many other insults, as people learn to ignore it, rather than let it rile them, it looses it's potency, and will likely be replaced with another insult that is just a…
/r/TheRedPill28/02/15 01:58 PM
1

A lawsuit itself is already a punishment.
/r/MensRights05/02/15 08:29 AM
5

... ... did just you just invent a pedo-bear smilie to tell him not to be afraid of false accusation of child molestation. o.O; I'm not sure whether to be impressed or frightened.
/r/MensRights23/12/14 04:54 PM
1

Feminist Icon or Con Artist? That's like asking "reptile or scaly thing".
/r/MensRights27/11/14 11:10 AM
16

"Polite society": Overly pretentious, and catering to the desires of women to be wined and dined in huge ball rooms like royalty.
/r/TheRedPill27/11/14 10:11 AM
2

And that works oh so well.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 08:26 AM
3

"No, no, sorry. Not enough patriarchy here." "Wait, isn't your job to get rid of patriarchy?" "Whatever gave you that idea? Obviously your patriarch was lacking. As with this parrot. It's dead." "No it's not." "It is extinguished, expired. It is no more. It has joined the quire invisible. This is an ex-parrot." "Hold it, hold it. You blokes have broken into the wrong skit! We'll have to call an end to this right here."
/r/MensRights27/11/14 06:14 AM
3

Except that'd only be for the women.
/r/MensRights27/11/14 06:09 AM
1

And it's not just "odds of meeting women". For the 9 in 10 negative effects. I get comments from STEM guys all the time about how they wish more women were hired, so they didn't have to go up or down multiple floors just to find an unoccupied stall for #2. Personally, I'd rather have the most competent and low-drama co-workers I can, and get a little bit more stair climbing in, but maybe that's just me.
/r/MensRights16/11/14 05:00 AM
–

I think he meant the idea that Obama is a reptile isn't that far fetched. Personally, he seemed to energetic on the campaign trail to me, even during winter, to be cold blooded.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 05:11 PM
2

Right, until you get assaulted by the person you are trying to help, or get threatened by white knights.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 05:10 PM
–

This reminds me of the argument to get rid of women's jails because only 7% of people incarcerated are women and therefore, they are "affected disproportionately". See, 7% < 51%, so it's technically true that it's disproportionate in their favor but when a feminist says "women are disproportionately affected" this means "women are affected worse". It's a classical example of statist language games.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 05:02 PM
1

Yep. No male spaces. Feminism wants to eradicate those, while setting up more female spaces. Why? Some combination of women insisting on chasing men wherever they go to get access to those men, and people imagining the men holding evil overlord conferences.
/r/MensRights13/11/14 04:54 PM
1

Much of the time employerrs don't care about transcripts. They care about some sub-selection of the following: Do you have a degree that we, as sub-contractors, can market to the people we're contracting to/that our HR department adds as a requirement to everything, even if the job is collating/filing paper and data entry that could be done by a high school dropout do you have the skills we need to actually get the work done do you check boxes that get us government money/bidding advantages/prot…
/r/MensRights13/11/14 04:52 PM
7

I think that this woman could use a better teacher. Her poor grammar is showing her "lack of disrespect" for her own mind. Also, I wonder how she would have reacted to a father bringing in penis cookies for little girls to eat. o.O; Badly, obviously enough. What I'm curious about is the specific form her hysterics would take.
/r/MensRights23/09/14 07:27 AM
2

Sounds like a perfect reason not to invite women to my parties. "Sorry, not interested in taking on the government-imposed liability. Don't like it, change the law." "You're a sexist misogynist!" "No, the government is." "Get bent shitlord!" Loose a lot of friends (ingroup/outgroup, remember?)
/r/MensRights20/09/14 06:31 PM
1

Meanwhile, the same type of bombing conducted one week is "a defensive action", next week it is "an offensive action", and by no means should prolonged acts of war actually be called a "war". It's a "police action" or "a counter-terrorist operation". But we've got the "war on women" and "war on drugs" and "war on poverty". Yeah. Never mind that the president has had war-powers constantly ever since the Korean war, due to our formally still being at war with North Korea.
/r/MensRights20/09/14 06:29 PM
2

I am weary of defining feminism Then don't. We've got a good handle on what the pile of filth is.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/14 06:00 PM
2

The day i see females protesting in favour of the male who has been wronged by a woman, then i too will be open to helping them achieve equality. GirlWritesWhat for a very public example. I haven't checked out the other garls on HoneyBadgerRadio. There are some out there that care about men. In many cases they are the mothers of boys or men. Yet another reason why feminists hate it when a woman gives birth to a boy.
/r/TheRedPill20/09/14 05:58 PM
2

This is so common and false a response, I've got a pre-canned response to this one. "Bullshit. The horrible feminists are mainstream feminists. NOW, the largest feminist organization in the US campaigned for blaming men for all domestic violence even when they are defending themselves from knife weilding psychos. Hillary Clinton claimed that women 'that loose their husbands' are more victims of war than those men that have lost their limbs, their lives, or their minds to the horrors of it. Women…
/r/TheRedPill20/09/14 05:52 PM
2

That is just horrific. Any links to that specific fact so that I can share it with others?
/r/TheRedPill20/09/14 05:42 PM
1

She slapped him, then walked off, and he followed and then got into her face. At the very least, he errored here, and both of them can reasonably be assumed to have lacked discernment at this point -- her for slapping someone who could destroy her skull with his hands if he wanted to, him for continuing the conflict. Inside the elevator, she then appears to elbow him in the face, around the eyes, to which he responds with a strike, and then finally creates (not enough) distance. She charges him,…
/r/MGTOW18/09/14 02:15 PM
11

Legal system. Take a look at the excellent video Don't Talk to Police The directly relevant part is several minutes that start at about 10:40, but the entire video is worth a watch.
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 02:06 PM
3

If a 14 year old boy is old enough to consent to sex, then a "faster to emotionally mature" 14 year old girl must be also, neh? Or is it illogical double-standards day?
/r/MensRights18/09/14 01:54 PM
3

I see what you did there. Interesting that, at this time, the resulting vote counts are different. :P
/r/TheRedPill18/09/14 01:45 PM
16

We are in the end period of the lifecycle of empires. Internal fractous forces eat our own prosperity, as the values that gave us that prosperity crumble, or are already gone. Feminism is a recurring point of similarity, having shown up in multiple empires toward the end of their standing as an empire. Those recurring values, for the record, include rewarding hard work and value contributed to society, whole and legitimate families as eminently important, those who do not work shall not eat, des…
/r/TheRedPill14/09/14 04:04 PM
11

Noooo, blaming the person that was defending himself is blaming the victim.
/r/MensRights12/09/14 02:17 AM
3

So... here's the question.... what do you sell an aging, depressed, 30ish year old single woman? Considering the college demographics right now with women getting more degrees, I think you may be mixing up money source and money sink. Especially since a fair number of people in general who don't control themselves want to get a husband to pay off their college debt, get the government to pay it off, or wind up trying to dodge their creditors. Selling useless college degrees (especially the highe…
/r/TheRedPill12/09/14 02:13 AM
2

Are you sure this isn't just due to more and more messaging about "no decent guys left" from their older spinster relatives, or due to them hitting the carousel harder, earlier?
/r/TheRedPill12/09/14 02:11 AM
7

Wash: "I am a leaf on the wind. Watch me soar." Saves the day Zoe: "Excuse me captain, but I need this man to rip all of my clothes off." Wash: eyeroll "Work work work." The fact that he is one of the best pilots out there, saves her life on a regular basis in combat that just isn't hand-to-gun-to-foot, and is able to be cocky and funny at the same time may have something to do with it.
/r/TheRedPill11/09/14 10:07 PM
2

This is something of a prisoner's dilemma in meetings. If one person is constantly talking, refusing to let others break in, and breaking in to what they are saying, collaboration becomes difficult. It's particularly infuriating if that person says he wants information, but will not give a pause for others to give that information without seeming rude. On the other hand, there are times when someone specifically asks you if you have something to contribute. While I am still attempting to train m…
/r/TheRedPill07/09/14 06:28 AM
–

Man and woman being confrontational, even if the man is keeping his voice low but firm, and the woman is being hysterical (especially if the woman is being hysterical) ends badly for the man.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 04:54 AM
1

I suggest you put a good lawyer on retainer. Personally, I stopped volunteering with children, including family members, for similar reasons.
/r/MensRights03/09/14 04:48 AM
7

An interesting game. The only winning move is not to play.
/r/MGTOW01/09/14 08:22 AM
3

I think that your minimum estimation is low. I'd got as high as a minimum of 75%. When it comes to rape laws/regs, I have a go to test. Husband brings home chocolate strawberries, flowers, and champagne, shares them with his wife, that cooked steak, with sauteed onions and mushrooms and au gratin potatoes (or substitute some other tasty meal that happens to be his favorite) since it's their anniversary. He picks her up, heads to the bedroom, and makes her squeal in inarticulately happy ways. If …
/r/MensRights30/08/14 01:24 PM
3

Hey, it's better than him calling her a "lady" which you see all the time, and would seem to be the anatomically correct label.
/r/MensRights30/08/14 11:57 AM
7

How, exactly, was trying to retrieve stolen property, in the process of being stolen, harassment?
/r/MensRights30/08/14 11:53 AM
3

And their useless degrees being useless will be the result of Massage-O'Knee, Irish Lord of the Dung Heep.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 03:29 AM
4

At some colleges even this is insufficient. Some colleges allow these bogus complaints against their students by members of the surrounding community.
/r/MensRights24/08/14 03:27 AM
2

Glad the clarification worked. As long as you're basing your path on reality, rather than the thinking you can have 100% control of the outcome, and you're trying to maximize results rather than throwing a pity party, you're ahead of at least 95% of the population of the US, and I salute your efforts.
/r/TheRedPill22/08/14 12:01 AM
–

Robot Chicken, M-Knight-shamamalama. "What a twist!"
/r/MensRights21/08/14 04:15 PM
3

It seems to me you're saying that MSNBC, and NBC don't even count as news programs any more. I'm cool with that analysis.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 04:12 PM
22

In the US systems, 3rd parties occasionally do make it, but more often one of the major parties shifts to be more in line with that 3rd party to gain more votes / avoid loosing votes. Sort of like how the Dems shifted to absorb green party positions, and how the Repubs are in the process of shifting to try to absorb libertarian votes, even while sneering at them and the tea party. Of course, stated positions, and actual actions are often so very different. In politics, as with with women, watch …
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 04:10 PM
13

My point is that you are insisting on bearing all the blame, and this may be a delusion. Making adjustments based on delusion is not the same thing as actual improvement. There are 3 steps here. Identify what problems you actually caused. Identify how to correct those problems. Act on step 2. Skipping step 1 can be as problematic in achieving optimal results as skipping step 2 or step 3. To paraphrase one of my martial arts instructors: "You have to know where your hand is coming from, before I …
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 04:00 PM
9

Oi. I'm not saying to cry on the sofa. I'm saying that it is important to understand the limitations of your action within any system, how to best operate within them, and how to expand those limitations. Your analysis is indeed important, but it needs to be based on reality, otherwise you're "improving" towards a delusion as surely as is a nice guy who thinks he just needs to get nicer, and the girls will fall into his bed.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 03:33 PM
24

I think this would be a good RP blog post for you to read. http://illimitablemen.com/2014/08/17/the-three-rs-romanticisation-realisation-responsibility/ In particular: You’re only inherently responsible for how well you objectively govern, not any affront to your governance. If you lead well but she objects to follow, that’s not your fault. It is implied a good leader will not lose influence over their subordinates, but that is not necessarily so. If someone thinks there are better alternatives …
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 03:19 PM
12

It's worse than that. Not providing traditional privileges of being a woman to women, while also denying any traditional privilege given to men, and trying to give it to women, while absolving women of all responsibility for their own actions or outcomes is "misogyny".
/r/MensRights21/08/14 02:55 PM
2

Civil means skip the snark. That's funny. It has, as a pre-requisite, not being a ponce who ignores another's points. Women don't woo men, court them, or otherwise compete with each other for men's affections. I don't know where you get this weird idea. Of course as a general rule women don't compete with each-other for sex, etc from men, especially over particular men. They compete over resources, and for status within the tribe that makes them more desirable (so that more men compete over them…
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 04:34 AM
2

This conversation is actually rather amusing. In particular, how you pretended I didn't have points, then try to deride me for not meeting your expectations for what constitutes a "civil" discussion, when I call you out for failing to meet mine. Humans are an omnivorous species, that according to most theories of evolutionary history, had a group dynamic comparable to a pack or herd (similar to the social structures of some apes) for much of their history, which provided them adaption, and the a…
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 04:09 AM
2

Women have no biological motive to kill the offspring of other women because women are not jealous and suspicious of the maternity of other women's offspring. I already gave a biological motive. Way to pay attention. I am not going into cultural adaptions here. Then you shouldn't be saying word 1 about the cultural adaptation known as marriage.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 03:19 AM
6

YES, this. One of my fav things plates will say is "I've noticed female shop girls / waitresses / etc. seem to give you better service than most people and flirt with you..." Interesting. I'd never considered it from that angle. I tend to make myself a semi-regular customer at places that offer what I want with quality and service. I've noticed that both guys and girls (especially the girls) seem to jostle to get some friendly attention and chatting, since it's a break in the monotony, and most …
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 02:35 AM
3

Under the assumption that biological propagation is the primary motivation, then outside of societies with marriage (in highly polygamous societies), women will also have reason to sabotage the pregnancies of other women, and kill the offspring of other women (or even the other women themselves), in order to maximize the amount of economic benefit provided to their own children, on an individual basis, by the small number of men who breed, and head the tribe. However, any resources a man spends …
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 01:43 AM
2

What makes you say that? They're raking in the dough and creating a larger and larger industry, with more and more appellate positions, getting more and more of them more money.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 12:14 AM
3

That was a risk of having sex. Inside marriage, with someone to care for you during your period of being physically disabled, the risk went down. So actually, it would be more rational to view marriage as a form of pregnancy risk-mitigation for women. Similarly, it was a way to gain additional resources for their offspring.
/r/TheRedPill21/08/14 12:02 AM
1

I'm glad that you liked my post. Part of the problem is the oppressor / oppressed paradigm, which is one I have recently found myself falling into with regards to feminism, and the police, due to just how much of our culture has been permeated with this idea. If we can somehow manage to excise the paradigm, and instead look at the problems in front of us, understand the facts on the ground as they exist, then I think we'll make some important adjustments. Those truths include the facts that men …
/r/MensRights20/08/14 01:58 PM
6

"Punch like a girl", or "Throw like a girl" is around from when there actually where typical ways that girls did things and boys did things. In "The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn", Huck disguised himself as a girl at one point, and a woman was able to tell he was a boy disguised as a girl because of how he threaded a needle like a man does (in an inferior way), how he caught an object between his legs (by closing them, rather than opening them to tent the dress), and by how he threw a heavy obj…
/r/MensRights19/08/14 03:18 PM
1

I think it's important to make sure that you are teaching in a modern language by the end of the student's transition through the program though. If you want students to be able to get a job right out of college, instead of needing to go for an unpaid internship (harder to get now, due to labor board regulations getting enforced), or take additional non-scheduled classes, you need to make sure you teach a language in broad industry use. In the case of C-like languages, that limits you to Java or…
/r/MensRights19/08/14 12:43 AM
3

And there are some people who genuinely want to know more, or better understand the material, that wind up sounding like this. Sometimes the questions help others, sometimes it pisses people off. Usually it depends on how well the student constrains himself. Yes. I know due to being that guy, and I learned how to constrain myself a lot better. Also, when working through multi-blackboard equations and derivations in a math class though, it's better to catch those small errors quickly, though, so …
/r/MensRights19/08/14 12:40 AM
1

I'm very glad that my comment was of help to you. Thank you very much for the gold. It's my first time having a gilded comment.
/r/MensRights19/08/14 12:23 AM
–

If you do some additional digging, you will find that Feminism is rooted in Marxist ideology of the oppressor class / oppressed class, casting men as the villains, and women as the virtuous victims, much the same way that classical marxism casts the farmer, the store-keep, the factory boss, and the banker as villains, and "the proletariat" as the virtuous victim. The transition between these strains can be traced to the Frankfurt school (originally in Germany, though many of it's members moved t…
/r/MensRights17/08/14 03:39 PM
1

Rather topical, considering the recent re-invasion of the Crimea by Russia under Putin. It's rather similar to how Catherine II directed Potempkin to invade the Crimea.
/r/MensRights17/08/14 03:18 PM
1

Perhaps I was unclear. I made two statements in two different sentences. In the second, I was not claiming that the article was using examples that established the possibility I was discussing. I was stating those possibilities as an expansion of the point. I can see why you might think the second of the two sentences was referring to the cases in the article. As to the rest of your criticism, you are making more of my claim than I did, and calling that expansion ridiculous, rather than addressi…
/r/MGTOW13/08/14 08:02 AM
1

I'm very happy to hear that your college is more reasonable than some others, including the one I went to, due to it having the best scholarship package I was offered.
/r/MensRights13/08/14 05:28 AM
1

You act as though the injustices in that article are the worst examples of injustices related to paternity fraud. Evidence of something being bad isn't evidence of it not being worse.
/r/MGTOW13/08/14 05:26 AM
–

"Women's Studies", for example. Also, the various racial studies usually talk a lot about how the white man is evil, etc.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 05:52 AM
–

And most colleges require you to take one or more courses in grievance study to graduate, even if you want a degree in STEM.
/r/MensRights12/08/14 04:55 AM
0

The government of the USA does not have a monopoly on force. It does have several advantages, but not a monopoly. If they did, why would they spend so much energy on trying to form one?
/r/TheRedPill12/08/14 04:41 AM
1

Very true. Suppose she can choose not to have sex, but one of the pair can't resist temptation when the pair is together. Suppose also that her code of ethics is not flexible on this point (whether it's based on the bible or not). Given those two suppositions, she should break up with him, rather than continue to tempt them both, and make the guy uncomfortable by arousing his physical responses. Another concept in the bible is that some people can't "control their vessels". For said people, the …
/r/TheRedPill12/08/14 04:16 AM
3

Once you've had sex, your N is never going to be 0 again (no going back to being a virgin). That said, the concept of "go and sin no more" is definitely in the bible.
/r/TheRedPill11/08/14 08:56 AM
7

Yaknow, I can respect the desire not to have sex before marriage, in a culture with traditional marriage, where women and men are actually saving themselves for it. But in our current culture, women will boink a man before marriage, then try to rope him into marriage by cutting off the sex, or will use sex to get married, then dry up the supply, because they know that divorce sucks for men. Neither sex before marriage, nor denying your spouse coitus is endorsed by the bible. In fact, if you're n…
/r/TheRedPill11/08/14 08:54 AM
4

Part of the point of the article is that it doesn't have to be your kid, for you to be on the hook. There are cases where it's not your kid, you aren't married, the mother has you put down as the father on the certificate, and because you didn't know about it, you're on the hook.
/r/MGTOW11/08/14 08:44 AM
2

If a woman attacks a man, "subjecting her to the courts" is massage-o'-knee.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 04:02 PM
1

I had a teacher once that said that a white man can't help but be a racist, because no matter what opinion he holds, it's inherently racist. At least he was less of a bastard than the bitch teacher that said that all men are just mutated women missing a branch off of their 2nd x.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 03:56 PM
1

This is why at this point, any attempt at claiming massage-o'-knee now requires proof with me. And not just "look at this one thing he said!" I mean that I'd need to read the entire 100+ page manifesto that one shooter put out for the context before I'll believe he was so specifically a misogynist, and not a misanthrope that hated both men and women.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 03:54 PM
18

Never been to a church where the father's day rant blames men for something, while the mother's day homily is all sunshine and flowers, huh? Talking about men doesn't make you pro-man. People love to talk about guys by beating up on them.
/r/MensRights10/08/14 03:47 PM
1

I'm not sure they even do that. When they talk about history, they're usually lying, which isn't teaching history. For example. "Women didn't get the right to vote until x." Actually, before the given date, that was the result of the sufrigate movement, women could already vote in the majority of states. "Amelia Airhart, AKA 'Lady Lindy' became the first woman to fly across the Atlantic on [gives date]." Their given date is incorrect. On that date she was the first woman -to be flown- across the…
/r/MensRights10/08/14 03:24 PM
4

And to extend the analogy further, if someone only hangs out with the Christians due to not having other options, that person isn't really a Christian. If the person wants to change Christians to be less Christian... well, you wind up with the Churchian culture a lot of Christians in the manosphere talk about.
/r/MGTOW09/08/14 09:08 PM
0

Shion is one of the media examples I had in mind while writing that post, yes. Another is the male lead from the anime "If Her Flag Breaks". He was involved in an accident on a cruise ship that involved smoke, fire, and being crushed under a fallen structure. He might have reacted by having reactions to smoke, or open flames, or loud noises, or rushing crowds, or gotten claustrophobia, or been unable to make himself go under overhanging structures (or near free standing ones). His reaction was t…
/r/MensRights09/08/14 06:18 PM
12

"Feminist policies help men too! See? This man would be helped by demands for legally mandated work/life balance and... quotas?"
/r/MensRights09/08/14 05:31 PM
–

And there are even differences among those who have trauma involving guns. One might hit the ground at the backfire of an old junker (less and less common these days) or the slam of a door, but be fine handling his old service piece. Another might want to throw up if he even sees the image of a gun, but not have a problem with loud and sudden noises. This might be due to the differences in stimuli the soldier associates with the event. One might even have problems with the sound of a crying chil…
/r/MensRights09/08/14 05:24 PM
–

There is a pattern in which the bad behavior of women is socially excused by the unknown, and the bad behavior of men is socially exacerbated by it, in society. This happens over, and over again. And quite often, the calls to keep in mind that "we don't know the whole story" have nothing to do with objectivity, because in many of the cases, we know enough to make a reasonable judgement. Even court cases don't require that we know the whole story, just that a particular crime was committed by the…
/r/MensRights09/08/14 05:19 PM
–

The problem with trigger warnings is that what can trigger a PTSD episode can be unpredictable even for the person that has PTSD. That's part of why it's so harmful a disorder. There may be a few reliable ways to know that a specific sufferer of PTSD you are familiar with shouldn't be exposed to something, and avoid conditions you know your buddy or spouse is sensitive too... sort of like not cooking cream of wheat for a cyliac patient. But what reliably causes episodes for one person may well h…
/r/MensRights09/08/14 04:39 PM
3

Both circumcision and condoms decrease sensitivity, so you're expecting men to bear the same kind of unpopular cost not just once, but TWICE. Further, the penile shaft shits within the sheath of skin. Reducing the skin increases irritation from the condom, thus meaning that that one of the costs of circumcision is an increase in the cost in discomfort of condom use.
/r/MensRights09/08/14 12:38 AM
–

it teaches history What. Are you sure it isn't just teaching lies? I'm pretty sure it's just teaching lies.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 04:10 PM
–

Unless you can prove proffesional damages. But then, you'd probably be counting on a jury to believe the two of you, over a crying woman talking about being abused by the legal system after being assaulted. Even with a dump truck full of evidence it might not be enough.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 03:49 PM
2

Texas is one of the places that I am not interested in moving to due to common-law marriage, and anti-family court laws. Texas has a lot of good things going for them. Anti-family courts that screw people over less doesn't seem to be one of them. So your claim that Texas law is "pretty fair" is one I meet with a great degree of skepticism.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 03:26 PM
2

If you are going to marry, it may well be best to get a prenup, even if they are only upheld 20% of the time, because if a divorce happens, that's a chance not to get divorce-raped. But I keep hearing people talking about pre-nups as if they are iron-clad. And saying they get upheld "most of the time" under conditions x and y is an example of arguing by excluding cases that don't support your conclusion. Of course, once children enter the picture, the pre-nup provides little-to-no protection aga…
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 03:24 PM
2

This is a traditional tactic not only of lawyers, but is one of the underlying ways that marxism has been advanced. "Logic is not independent of context", after all. If an argument advances marxism, it is "logical", and good. If it goes against marxism it is "illogical" and bad. And after all, feminism IS a philosophical branch of marxism, complete with the oppressor/oppressed paradigm across "classes" of humanity.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 03:12 PM
1

Remember, these marital rights are called “rights” for a reason. Yes, and that reason is because people like naming as rights things that are not rights as an emotional manipulation. The ability to frivorce a man, and rob him in the divorce is not a right. It is an imposition on the inherent right of a person to the product of his own labor. Almost all of these parents had a “real” marriage without a prenuptial agreement. Emotional manipulation. Shaming tactic. Facts not in evidence that a prenu…
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 03:08 PM
1

You seem to find it more natural to read the bible as self-contradictory, rather than use it as context for itself. When you look at all 3 verses together, they're in concert. I wonder what your agenda is that you're trying to make the verses contradictory, rather than understanding how they work together.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 02:26 PM
–

My leige, I gravel at your feet.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 02:22 PM
3

Glad to be of help in spreading knowledge.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 08:26 AM
6

Are you aware that condom use is lower in circumscized populations, than those that are uncut? If you push circumcision you will actually undermine future efforts to encourage condom use.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 07:38 AM
3

Ah yes, the fear-mongering nonsense that at any moment, LOOK OUT BEHIND YOU! You're about to get raped! We'll ignore that all crime (including sexual assault) is at the lowest it's been in the history of mankind. Before you all scream 1 rape is too many, YES I agree, and men are raped too. The end. Also, men have more to worry about than women when it comes to being mugged, or otherwise physically assaulted. That includes worrying about being murdered.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 07:00 AM
6

And even if two men are having a good natured, but intense argument, someone who is trained up in feminine communication styles will tend to feel threatened, and try to "get everyone to make nice and get along" and otherwise undermine the attempt to share information and perspective (and possibly arrive at an agreement). I've seen women do it, and I've seen insecure/feminine men do it as well.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 06:40 AM
1

And even if it doesn't, make sure that folks know you are not married before the state. That you are going with a much more ancient, and important tradition of marrying before the community (and, if religious, God). If you're going to walk across pumice, it never hurts to add extra levels of protection for your feet.
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 06:30 AM
–

Yep. You got me. Masagge-o'-knee's the name. I'm the Irish lord of the dung-pile. Have you seen my legendary wooden pooper scooper (aka mucking shovel)?
/r/MensRights08/08/14 06:19 AM
1

Titus 2:3-5 NASB Older women likewise are to be reverent in their behavior, not malicious gossips nor enslaved to much wine, teaching what is good, 4so that they may encourage the young women to love their husbands, to love their children, 5to be sensible, pure, workers at home, kind, being subject to their own husbands, so that the word of God will not be dishonored. It's not really a contradiction. Elder women are supposed to use their authority to guide younger ones to godliness and submissio…
/r/TheRedPill08/08/14 06:10 AM
2

Speed limits are the result of a political process that involves some science, and some political wrangling. Just look at the previous US national speed limit of 55 mph (with no consideration of roads with excellent condition) imposed through the highway bill, or how different political entities determine different speed limits on roads of similar caliber, or how the default for all exit ramps, with wide variation in condition, is 45 mph in many places. Speed limits are at least somewhat arbitra…
/r/MensRights08/08/14 03:34 AM
2

And it's not like anyone is getting drafted, for fuck's sake. Either we have a real possibility of a draft eventually happening, or the selective service is useless.
/r/MensRights08/08/14 03:29 AM
–

In that case you have two options. You lower the standards for both, which degrades our ability to fight, and we spend more in blood and treasure to make up for it. I don't like options that lead to more death. You keep the same high standards for both. Only those at or approaching olympic athelete levels of physical fitness have a chance to be in combat roles, but women could still be drafted. Thus, in any conflict in which there would be a draft, the vast majority of the war-dead would still b…
/r/MensRights08/08/14 03:28 AM
–

The claim is over a living human, who hasn't been born yet. Late term abortions, in particular, kill children that can live outside of the womb. This is even more pronounced for "partial birth" abortions, where you allow the crown of the head of the child to leave the womb, and then pierce the skull or tear off an arm to kill the partially-born child. In some abortion clinics, children that were born "by mistake" are then killed as "a corrective measure". With sufficient medical technology, even…
/r/MensRights08/08/14 12:43 AM
2

The latter, though this still leaves me vulnerable to rape. And I don't even live in the UK.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 03:38 PM
–

You might think so, but no.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 03:27 PM
–

No, but he child is 50% his, and unless she was a sperm theif, he had something to do with that child being inside of her.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 03:20 PM
–

Reproduction is a mammalian issue, of which kittens are a subset. Men are mammals. Kittens are an MRA issue. "All cats are mammals, all dogs are mammals. Not all dogs are cats." Also, if you abort a pregnancy, that pretty solidly falls outside the category of reproduction, since you either have not reproduced, or the abortion kills the instance of reproduction. Thus, an instance of abortion cannot fall within the category of reproduction.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 03:17 PM
3

Personally, I think that framing this as extending legal parental surrender to both the custodial and non-custodial parents is a better path toward making it happen. There are enough folks that see abortion as a negative event (myself included) that this risks triggering fights against it you wouldn't normally see.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 03:14 PM
–

Note that in England, it is illegal to get a paternity test without the consent of the mother.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 03:10 PM
1

Interesting. Given how easily people could game that (yeah, my room-mate and I are 'domestic partners'), and how more and more businesses are focusing on their employees, and the shift of insurance programs to be better for single folks than married with kids, I would expect this final push to lead to insurance companies just not offering insurance for spouses any more. Don't get me wrong. I don't think that you need a state certificate to actually be married. In fact, I think government interve…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 02:35 PM
4

The mirror scenario is brought up by feminists to minimize the 70% number. "Well who files isn't as important as who causes the divorce. I mean, if he's beating her or cheating, it's reasonable to divorce." Of course Dalrock has a post up parsing the stats on that, and it shows that cheating being the primary reason for the decision for divorce is relatively rare. "Irreconcilable differences" (i.e. 'the whispers' or 'frivorce') is the leading "cause".
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 02:33 PM
1

http://dalrock.wordpress.com/ in case anyone is not familiar. He's a Christian blogger who blogs regarding marriage and the Church. He also blogs about using game inside of marriage, and does in depth analysis of statistics.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 02:30 PM
–

I see. Employers, as a benefit, often choose to contribute to the health insurance expenses when a person includes a spouse, or children. If they do not view the marriage as valid, is there something that forces them to contribute insurance to someone they don't want to?
/r/MensRights07/08/14 02:28 PM
0

So the politicians that try to impose this obligation, rather than going to fight themselves, that find ways not to send their own children, but instead force others to fight for their own benefit, are not cowards? And being willing to speak up against this, and go to jail if necessary on a moral principle, is cowardly? If my nation needs me, because an evil force is occupying it (be it of a source external, or internal), and a struggle ensues to reject this force, I will pick up my own arms to …
/r/MensRights07/08/14 02:24 PM
21

Decide to divorce 80%, actually file 70%. The discrepancy is made up by them convincing the husband to file.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 08:53 AM
23

as a women's rights activist That's not what she said she was. She said she was a feminist.
/r/TheRedPill07/08/14 08:51 AM
1

Some men find women in high heels and distorted walking stances sexy. I find myself put off, or worrying about why their pelvises are so seriously out of alignment (until I see their shoes, or forget the woman exists). Prime media example: Seven of Nine (from Star Trek: Voyager).
/r/MensRights07/08/14 08:18 AM
–

it's our duty to go fight it. Only if, in your judgement as a free man, you are convinced that the survival of your current form of government (as opposed to the alternatives if the war is lost) is worth the risk of your life, and that of the other people signing up to go to war. The duty is not yours unless you take it up willingly. An attempt to force that duty onto others is reprehensible and cowardly.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 08:13 AM
1

Only a minority of states have common law marriage, and the requirements vary by area. Do some research based on your state, and if necessary contact a lawyer.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 08:09 AM
2

Very true. And we're allowed to think those rules are bad.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 07:57 AM
–

I'm aware of how to get the hospital visits (legal documents such as living will, etc). What about the shared health insurance?
/r/MensRights07/08/14 07:56 AM
1

a). Go along with his deal, have a wedding but no marriage. and hope for the best. Que? If you've had a wedding you're married. You just don't have a state certificate.' Besides which, on his end, if they have kids and break up, he'll still easily get screwed by child support. I'd also be worried about common-law.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 07:51 AM
1

And yet, wisdom has at it's base, an understanding that the wise man is still yet a fool. We can not know all, and to think otherwise is huberus. Yet, there are rules which we can follow which, in the large, prove correct. In the short term, truth may be painful, but over the long-term it is better for society. In most cases, it is also better for the individual, even if we are just talking about the temporal world. I have a code of Ethics which is based off of my best (but limited) understandin…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 07:23 AM
–

I do not mean a formal code of ethics with numbered rules, and the like. But I do mean a standard of behavior and motivations, and an understanding of what is and is not acceptable. Some of the worst monsters through out time had a very strong sense of self.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 06:35 AM
–

You learn to harden your skin and ignore the inevitable and mutually exclusive shaming tactics that come from all quarters at all times, and learn to make your own decisions. This takes away some of the most potent weapons that feminists (and others of their ilk) have to abuse you with. It is important, at the same time, to ensure that you adhere to a code of ethics, and have an internal source of shame when you break that code, and to self-correct. Then, if you actually need to defend yourself,…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 05:22 AM
5

Or just by the sex-neutral profession name. "Farmer", or "soldier", or "law enforcement officer", etc. The pandering works by bribing people to vote for you by being the guy to give them the better deal of either guns and butter (statist republicans), or butter and guns (statist democrats) bought with other people's money, rather than by preserving their freedom from government intervention (the more libertarian members of either party). It's part of the modern form of buying loyalty and gratitu…
/r/MensRights07/08/14 05:06 AM
6

Pandering to audiences that are majority men works all the time. For example, pandering to cops at police union events. Or pandering to farmers with crop bills.
/r/MensRights07/08/14 12:38 AM
-1

From what I understand, borderline personality disorder tends to be worse than psychopathy. Here is the first of a series of videos on the 4 classical personality types, explained from a Freudian perspective, and how they break to create the four classical mental disorders. This one is the introductory video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zjJaOQFeFQQ Here is the video on the borderline, specifically. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVTfEiz4Nbc
/r/MensRights27/07/14 08:07 AM
1

Yes. Spell-check + fatigue = worse errors. Glad you liked the rest of the description.
/r/MensRights26/07/14 01:11 AM
5

To many women, men who do try an approach fall into 3 categories. The guys they notice, and feel positively enough that they want sex with him. The guy doesn't have to be financially successful, or as physically attractive as Sean Connery. Large amounts of confidence often count, or perhaps he's a hipster artist other hipsters in her crowd think is a genius. The average guys who's approaches don't register as approaches. The "creepy" guy who is low-value enough to her that she is actively repuls…
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 07:33 AM
1

I value my connection with my family very highly, and even if I disagree vehemently with people I care about on some things, that doesn't mean I can't love them, and appreciate receiving their love. And having a relationship with either parent I have means some level of relationship with the people they are involved with. I could try to have a relationship with JUST that parent, but that wouldn't work very well. Similarly, I have been struck physically by each of my parents, and I don't mean spa…
/r/MensRights25/07/14 07:03 AM
1

Also? She and family both confirm that her arms looked nothing like that. Oh how I enjoy crushing that particular icon with facts, to the few male feminists I run across capable of learning.
/r/TheRedPill25/07/14 06:34 AM
1

At this time, the MRM is a coalition movement that includes equalitarians that view equality only as as strict equivalence, and those who take a more complementarian view, using a broader metric for equality, but still hold respect for the equality of the human dignity of men and women. There has been some effort to remove complementarians from the movement, but I do think that this would be a mistake, and thus far the coalition has been maintained. I do think that being able to hold adult conve…
/r/MensRights25/07/14 06:17 AM
3

You are identifying the warrior code portion of Chivalry, similar to Bushido in many ways, but with a more Christian flavor, where as Bushido was more Shinto and Zeb Buddhist in association. This was how Chivalry initially began. However, there was an anti-Christian reactionary romance movement. This movement had very different ideas of what "love" was. In many ways it was conflated with lust, in others, it was men exhibiting the behavior of vassals toward the women they loved, and was said, ide…
/r/MensRights25/07/14 05:54 AM
11

Better not to talk to them, but instead send an e-mail to your insurance company, HR at the hospital, and the hospital billing office explaining the situation that caused you to leave due to sexual discrimination, and indicate that you won't be paying for services not rendered, and request that you be seen by a male doctor, who you would be willing to pay, but only through the same system, if you receive notification of a note of reprimand, or worse, being placed in the files of those staff memb…
/r/MensRights25/07/14 05:25 AM
2

Upvote for actually considering the point of someone else who takes a position that you have previously disagreed with.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 05:22 AM
2

Right off the top of my head, both of my step-parents have stated some variety of this statement, just not in those terms. Republican Step mom: "I just think that any man I could respect would never hit a woman." "Even to defend himself from being stabbed?" "Never." Democrat Step dad, regarding a wimpy office worker who was assaulted and had a bruised eye, by his olympic athlete girlfriend, when I specifically put it in those terms: "I'm sorry, but if a guy can't block a punch by a girl, he dese…
/r/MensRights25/07/14 05:19 AM
-1

At least she didn't put it in the sleeping guy's ass.
/r/MensRights25/07/14 05:09 AM
2

I got it second hand from the guys that got the training, and have to deal with the threat of it.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 05:57 AM
1

In the US Mense Rea (the mental component you speak of) has been GREATLY weakened as a legal concept due to both the pushes of the professional grievance industry, and regulatory agencies, where regulations written by unelected bureaucrats ignore the concept of Mense Rea, probably due to their not being competent enough to know what it is.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 05:08 AM
–

Also the US military has some pretty wonky standards on drink and consent. If two members of the navy are married, share a bottle of campaign and have anniversary sex, the husband "raped" the wife.
/r/MensRights24/07/14 05:05 AM
2

Whenever someone says they are deconstructing x, I'm pretty sure that whatever they put out is going to be worse than x. It'll be lower quality, make less sense, and introduce a huge number of elements that have nothing to do with what they are "deconstructing". It's just a way of trying to sound artsy about making something that is worth less than whatever it is you're mocking.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 07:03 AM
6

Regarding #3. The majority of relationship counceling advise has the modern culture baked into it's assumptions. The culture expects "continual courtship". Pastors say "Women are sinning because men are failing them, and not doing what they need." Girlfriends say "if he's not doing what you 'need' him to do, he doesn't deserve you, girlfriend". Engaging in facilitated communication places you within the facilitator's frame, which is usually that the man is wrong, and needs to change to meet the …
/r/TheRedPill23/07/14 06:45 AM
–

Not to detract from your entirely valid point, but I am curious as to how long you'd have been able to stay had it been dad and the kids, and how long it would have been had it just been your mother with no kids. I imagine the center didn't even consider that scenario.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 05:08 AM
–

Actually, even absent the laws, women who are homeless have more options. Pandering is easier, and it's quite easy to feed yourself as a whore. Are the options good? No. But there are still more of them. The homeless are also more vulnerable to violence, and violence is more often enacted on men. So while homlessness is a horrible condition for both sexes, if it's worse for one sex than the other, I'm pretty sure it's worse for men, in addition to it being more prevalent.
/r/MensRights23/07/14 05:06 AM
–

Feminists misuse a large number of words on purpose, because changing the framing of an argument is a very powerful tool.
/r/MensRights21/07/14 03:47 AM
1

The vast majority of the war dead in wars through history have been men. This includes the armies that a ruler raised. From pikemen, to the men in the trenches in WWI, to the men fighting and dieing across the world today. This includes the armies that they were sent to kill. It also typically includes the civilian population on whatever was the loosing side. Sacking armies through-out most of history tended to kill civilian men, and rape and take civilian women. To engage in war, as an intrinsi…
/r/MensRights21/07/14 03:19 AM
2

Mixed. Most folks around me want to keep their heads stuck in the sand. Some acknowledge some points that they can't really deny, and agree that men have problems. Others say "wow Josh, it really seems like you hate women sometimes", even when all I'm doing is debunking myths, and showing how guys can get screwed over in the legal systems. These are generally people that are already retired, or are advantaged by it. Some men around my own age, and some that are older either nod and get it, or em…
/r/MensRights20/07/14 03:31 PM
18

There's also the self-editing people do of their own thoughts, and self-images, in order to feel better about themselves, even when they think they're being honest. Take it as a given that most women say they want a guy who's at least 6ft tall. Then for most women, if she admits, even to herself, that she'll accept a guy that's 5'10", this is going to damage her ego, making her think that since her standards are lower, she's worth less. There are many women out there who are convinced they want …
/r/TheRedPill20/07/14 03:04 PM
3

The basic problem with the satire of political positions via exaggeration is that there are nutjobs that will enthusiastically agree with any position you exaggerate. Keep in mind that many feminists argue that only men being drafted is misogynistic against women.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 02:46 PM
1

When the first "fact" is a BS feminist estimation of how many women in prison were battered by their husbands, the rest wasn't worth reading.
/r/MensRights20/07/14 02:44 PM
2

If men and women were being drafted in equal numbers, (finding equal numbers of women that meet the necessary physical standards for a potent military), and being put into equivalent positions, then it wouldn't be a men's right's issue. As it stands, if an institution enslaves only (or a vast majority of) men (presses them into some job position or another against their will), for whatever reason, then that dichotomy it's a men's rights issue. If a given group spares women, but then decides to k…
/r/MensRights20/07/14 02:41 PM
1

I know this isn't TRP, but I think you might like a distillation of some of the advice I've read in that realm that isn't "alpha asshole", and that you might actually want to work with. Start with self respect, and improving yourself for you. Focus on yourself and get, emotionally, to a place where you're okay with not having a wife/girlfriend/etc. They call it "outcome independence". Also, make sure you are as physically fit as you can be. Is that enough? No, but it helps (with many things in l…
/r/MensRights16/07/14 04:14 AM
2

Such as the myths that 1 in x are raped in environment y, z cents on the dollar pay disparity for equal work, etc.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 04:00 AM
2

Many female leaders through-out history have been involved in war or assassination. Just take a look at the most famous of the Cleopatras, or Catherine II of Russia. It would probably be most accurate to say that wars are started by the powerful to satisfy their own desires (for material/power benefit, to satisfy their own senses of justice, etc), and those with less power pay the price.
/r/MensRights16/07/14 03:52 AM
4

twitch I couldn't even get past his self-introduction.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 05:05 AM
0

No, you came in talking about "Feminism" and "the MRM" agreeing. Men != MRM. Women != feminism. You've shown yourself to be willing to engage in dishonest tactics of shifting the goal-posts and what the conversation was about in the first place. I'm done here.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 04:29 AM
0

You're missing the point. I don't want "dialog" and "cooperation" with the group that's trying to make the world worse. I want to defeat it. Should we have "dialogued" with the Japanese while they were bombing our shores? With the Nazis when the were slaughtering Jews and Gypsies and black people, and the disabled? Why should I dialogue with a group where they get tenure for saying that 90% of men should be slaughtered for the good of humanity? Edit: Also? 70% of those who commit non-reciprocal …
/r/MensRights14/07/14 04:15 AM
1

I think they are referring to actions taken to induce arousal, using the digits (fingers) to create the stimulation. The equivalent of a hand job, but for women.
/r/TheRedPill14/07/14 03:35 AM
2

The better parent should have custody Subjective. Feminism backed assumed mother custody and the deluth model. the higher earner should pay alimony No. No one should pay alimony. equal pay for equal work An Old canard that the feminists lie about every time they bring up the 77% myth. It's ignorance at best, and a trojan horse at worst. equal jail/clemency for equal crime Again, what do you mean by "equal crime"? Many states still say a man can't rape a woman. If a woman forcing a man to have se…
/r/MensRights14/07/14 03:14 AM
1

TL;DR - can't we all just get along? When mainstream feminist organizations like NOW stop supporting laws like VAWA, but instead support the repeal, when the sexist whitehouse councils are ended, and when feminism stops protesting shelters for homeless men... we can talk about it. Until then, they are the enemy, and they made themselves so. Continually suing for peace with a group that fights you at every turn is suicidal.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 03:10 AM
1

Or maybe a Che t-shirt. Those seem to be the rage in much of the world.
/r/MensRights14/07/14 02:11 AM
3

The root of the issue is that it regards equality as zero sum. If you think that granting more rights and privileges to men means automatically and by definition that you're taking rights and privileges away from women, then of course you're going to oppose it. Well, to a certain extent they are right. The restoration of father's rights would eliminate the female privilege of presumed maternal custody. To take physical abuse against men seriously, women would get less sympathy when they initiate…
/r/MensRights13/07/14 11:28 PM
1

No, they'd just loose their jobs due to a massive mob threatening to boycott the products of anyone who advertises on the network as a whole, until such time as said person is fired. The person that said this would have a hard time getting hired for anything else due to the stigma as well. The only way he'd get arrested is if this caused him to miss his child support payments for an imputed income level.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 08:59 PM
1

I was saying that she got away with joking about cutting off a man's penis, and calling the cutting glorious... but given feminism, you have a good point that she "got away with" making the apology... probably because it gave cover to feminism "Noooo, that's not what we REALLY think, despite women getting their gender studies tenure for publishing works advocating the slaughter of men."
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 08:48 PM
2

"The Talk", a competing show to "The View", and the bitch with the red died hair gave a non-apology apology later on, and got away with it.
/r/TheRedPill13/07/14 08:39 PM
2

All through the article she keeps asking "why do men not want to get married and have children?" in a variety of rhetorical forms. However, she always frames this as being a negative quality of these men that is having a negative impact on women. At no point does she actually look at cost/benefit for men, or look at what these men want, or look at what these men have to deal with. She frames it as the immaturity of men disappointing women. She frames it as fear. This has nothing to do with inves…
/r/MGTOW13/07/14 09:01 AM
–

I'm indeed confused and frustrated why women date the shady, short-tempered, and playa types of guys, when there's a family minded drug-free strictly monogamous guy right here. Because as much as the women who date those guys claim otherwise, that's the kind of guy they want. Pay attention to the actions, not the words. Generally, when a woman wants a dangerous and unpredictable man, it's because she wants the excitement and emotional drama that relationship generates.
/r/MensRights11/07/14 07:42 AM
1

The same thing as regular feminism. Next question?
/r/MensRights11/07/14 06:30 AM
2

Excellent. I'm glad I was able to point you in the direction of more resources you would enjoy. You might also enjoy one of the other blogs on his blog-roll called "Elusive Wapiti", but I'm less certain about that one. I hope you understand now why, though I agree that feminism is nearly exclusively statist itself, there are similar problems in conservatism and, as Dalrock often calls it "Churchianity".
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 03:06 AM
15

You are quite welcome. When I know of resources others might make use of, I try to share.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 02:57 AM
2

There is a manosphere writer that I enjoy, and that I think you might be interested in as well. His name is Dalrock. He is married, is in favor of actual covenant marriage before God, and is definitely what those that ascribe to the left/right paradigm would call a conservative. I think he describes himself as Redpill. However, he does not mince words when it comes to infidelity of churches to the words of Christ, nor the failings of modern conservatism. I would highly suggest that you read one …
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 02:52 AM
1

Yes, but sometimes shoes that feel comfortable at first misalign the heel, and many shoes are designed to start narrowing after the ball of the foot, rather than only narrowing from the exterior side after they pass where the designer expects the little toe to be, which is fine if your foot is shaped that way, but if not, can lead to bunions. So I was hoping you had some tests that would help identify misaligning shoes, or sources for shoes that narrow post-toe. The only ones I'm aware of that f…
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 02:44 AM
4

I'm specifically talking about the boy being sexually assaulted by the state in order to chemically force arousal.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 02:36 AM
1

Unfortunately, part of what some conservatives fight for is often the venomous romantic-movement pedistalization of women, which was itself a radical and harmful movement of it's time, which became accepted and "mainstream". "Women are more pure than men" and "men are more vile and monstrous than women" seem to be two sides of the same bias. Just take a look at Mark Driscol for an example of "man up and marry those sluts". Edit: You are correct that feminism itself is the near-exclusive domain o…
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 02:36 AM
1

You seemed like you honestly wanted to know more, and you didn't demand "sources or gtfo". You asked for my opinion, and possibly sources. That kind of frank request for information is the kind I prefer to see, so I try to respond positively, to encourage it in the future. So you're welcome.
/r/TheRedPill10/07/14 02:32 AM
2

I think there was sarcasm involved, in that this is what blue-pillers think.
/r/MensRights09/07/14 03:25 PM
15

And the sexual assault is the serious part, not the snapping of the photo. And there are other cases where the photo-snapping doesn't involve sexual assault, such as the case in Japan where only the grandfather was arrested because he and his wife snapped pictures of their grandchildren happily playing in a pool in a screened in back yard, when they had no swimsuits to use.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/14 03:08 PM
1

Please, tell us more about this science of finding shoes that meet our functional needs. Knowledge about tool selection interests me.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/14 02:54 PM
15

"Way beyond sexual assault". There is something very wrong with the idea that the picture taking is worse than the actual assault.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/14 02:48 PM
4

Man, if you've got the connections to get into that office just for a jog, that's some cred with the right women right there.
/r/TheRedPill09/07/14 02:15 AM
2

Well, men are the victims of the majority of violent crimes, including domestic violence (at least in the US). Yet VAWA seeks to create a protected class out of the minority victim of violence rather than the majority victim of violence. Further, rather than punishing the aggressor in violent incidents, it specifies a number of measures that must be taken into account to decide who to arrest. These measures include who is larger, or who is stronger, which is almost always the man. It also requir…
/r/TheRedPill09/07/14 01:17 AM
6

He's talking about trans-humanism. According to trans-humanist ideals, a combination of genetic engineering, and technological enhancement will completely change what has come before. Many trans-humanists believe that the shift in technologies to where both are possible is either coming very soon, or we've already crossed the threshold. To an extent, I see the point. We've already got techological replacements for damaged human parts, and some of these parts give conditional mechanical advantage…
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 03:58 PM
1

Yeah, just asking to trade trainees instead of putting it in terms of "workplace violence" could work better, depending on your existing social channels, and how your work-place works. Glad the idea of having someone else train her was useful, though.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 03:36 PM
3

This is the great hypocrisy in conservatism, and this is coming from someone who is allied with conservatives on a number of issues. Conservatives claim to want to protect and support marriage, but what they are trying to conserve is already broken. Rather than trying to return to a working traditional model, rather than trying to heal what is broken, in many cases they are now conserving feminism. As Dalrock puts it, modern conservatism simply acts as a sea-anchor, simply slowing change, no mat…
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 10:28 AM
1

And this is part of why many people would like to see the "most votes wins, even if not a majority" system replaced with an instant-runoff system, so that you can vote libertarian (or green, or socialist, or whatever minority party) first, and then vote for a majority party as a backup without "helping the other side win".
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 10:02 AM
2

You can just say "Thanks for the info. I'm going to think it over, and get back to you." It's polite, honest, and if you've got a solid frame, it lets the person know you aren't buying now. I've done that multiple times when shopping.
/r/TheRedPill08/07/14 09:57 AM
–

Have you attempted to request that someone else train her, due to her having enacted workplace violence on you?
/r/MensRights08/07/14 05:28 AM
6

It's in the news more because it sells, so news orgs go looking farther afield for more violent stories as local violence dries up.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 05:09 AM
4

As long as the guys get individual shower cubicles too I see no problem with that last one. Most high quality gym facilities are going that rout, because there are some guys that don't want to get naked in front of others either (sometimes for religious reasons). Of course that's not going to happen.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 05:06 AM
1

While true, most folks that wind up coming to the manosphere (be it Mens Rights or Red Pill or some other portion of it), wind up coming in either the denial or anger phase. Note, I agree that some level of anger at injustice is not only healthy, but necessary for fixing it. I'm talking about a larger anger, near rage, that clouds thinking about as much as the denial phase does, and pushes away friends and family who might otherwise be supportive. Rather than presuming that someone is a feminist…
/r/MensRights08/07/14 05:04 AM
1

I don't think it's that women have a larger sex drive than men I think you reversed it.
/r/MensRights08/07/14 04:56 AM
1

puts another point on the big "why TED talks are not to be trusted" board
/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 09:03 AM
–

The root reason is that men have a higher sex drive than woman do, on average. So the market-wide demand for sex from a woman is higher than the market-wide demand for sex from a man. It's economics 101, just applied to a trade-sphere rather than a monetary one. But in regard to your original comment, this sub-reddit generally recognizes, and laments the "he was lucky" commenting that tends to happen. Lamenting something is not the same as participating in it. This is a part of the forum's focus…
/r/MensRights07/07/14 08:16 AM
1

In regard to the flair: a petition is not action. Particularly for a site that has already been repeatedly ignored (rather than as a part of a process to get a candidate on a ticket, for example). Donating to or volunteering at a homeless shelter to help the plight of homeless men is action. Volunteering as a child-advocate in the family court system, one who won't be anti-male or assume the mother should always get the child, is action. Volunteering to be a male figure in the life of a young bo…
/r/MensRights07/07/14 08:02 AM
1

Well given that I'm living in the US, and I specified "in the US" as an explicit disclaimer, I don't particularly see a problem with discussing it in that light. Also, I wouldn't go talking about anything government oriented from France that originates anywhere close to the French revolution with any positive light.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 07:35 AM
–

In the above scenario she's asking him not to go deeper. She is communicating during sex. So long as he doesn't go any deeper, or she hasn't used a safe word in a BDSM scenario, there literally is no problem from a consent standpoint. It's an immature comment that's already getting downvoted. You are imagining abuse into place, and making a mountain out of a mole hill, which makes it worse, not better. Just chill.
/r/MensRights07/07/14 07:31 AM
1

Marriage did pretty well for itself until the government got involved. In the US, state governments passed laws against inter-racial marriage. They then started issuing marriage licenses as permission for blacks and whites to marry, in exchange for a new revenue source (the marriage license fees). I'd rather not be forced into a legal institution with such a horrible past, if I choose to co-habitate, or to partake in a sacrament of my church.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 07:01 AM
2

Alternatively, if they have even a minor in a grievance studies degree, don't hire them based on lawsuit reduction.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 06:27 AM
–

Obviously it was a comment about how contact with the cervix actually causes pain, so the porn fantasy of super-deep penetration is some really messed up false advertising. That, or it was just someone taking an inception riff, and making a double-entente riff of of that, with no more thought involved. How you got rape out of that...
/r/MensRights07/07/14 06:22 AM
3

And then, once lives are ruined, there is more "evidence" that men are evil and need to be controlled, and that women are just victims that you should never teach how to be not-victims. There will be yet more boys growing up without ever having experienced fraternal bonds, or male-only spaces. There are more people (men and women, boys and girls) under the control of feminists, with just the expense of throwing some of them (boys and girls both) under the buss. Just look at feminism like a fitne…
/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 06:16 AM
23

NOW (National Organization of Women) is mainstream, not fringe. They were the driving force between a lot of the worst anti-male legislation out there, like VAWA. Sorry man, but apologetics based on extremism just don't work for feminism any more. There's just too much evidence. Feminism sucks. Deal with it.
/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 06:05 AM
9

Does it sound something like massage-o-knee, or mice-on-my-knee?
/r/TheRedPill07/07/14 06:02 AM
27

"Gender studies class" well there's your problem.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/14 03:43 PM
1

You're looking for a good reason and there really isn't one any more than there is for the continued use of heeled men's dress shoes. This is exactly my point, there is no good reason to vilify shorts. Violating these traditions makes you look like a uncultured twat regardless of how technically right you may be. No, not realizing that the world has moved on and left you behind makes you seem like a man out of time. Shorts are commonplace, and accepted around the world now. There may be a few pl…
/r/TheRedPill04/07/14 07:24 AM
0

As unfair or uncomfortable as you might consider it to be, shorts have long been and still remain a pancultural symbol of childhood. At this point you're just projecting motivations onto me to make yourself feel superior, and I see no point in continuing a discussion with someone who feels the need to insult people, in order to try to make his argument seem more right. So I'll argue with exactly as much support as you've given this entire argument. No. They aren't. Fact. Period. You are wrong. B…
/r/TheRedPill04/07/14 07:05 AM
2

Some traditions are good, and are established for the good of all. Ignoring them tends to lead to danger, or a breakdown of society. These are things like public shaming for adultery. Other traditions, such as the high heel, were instituted among the nobility. In this case, it was originally to keep their feet from slipping forward through the stirrup (much like the heel on a cowboy boot). However over time, it became more and more impractical, and was a part of putting on airs to prove that you…
/r/TheRedPill04/07/14 06:42 AM
0

Or if you are digging and running up against brambles in the woods, yes. But bomb squads wear protective gear that's even more extreme than that, and it doesn't make that gear any more "grown up". Form should follow function, not the other way around. In hot weather, a person should either be wearing a light robe (like they do in egypt) or skirt that allows air movement, or bare more skin to allow air movement that way, or clothing with a built in AC unit -- unless they have a specific reason to…
/r/TheRedPill04/07/14 02:08 AM
1

When you think she might be LTR material, and the two of you start seeing each-other more often so you can see if she really is or not, see what happens when you get sick. Don't whine, don't expect outright coddling. Just see what happens, and how she reacts. This isn't about the sluttyness factor, but rather her general suitability for an LTR.
/r/TheRedPill04/07/14 01:56 AM
1

Unfortunately, as Dalrock has pointed out, conservatism is a sea-anchor, with no fixed point to attach itself to, just resisting any change. In some cases it now finds itself conserving the changes that feminism managed to successfully force onto society. People are already predicting that establishment Republicans are going to try to oppose repealing Obamacare "because it's too late, and change would hurt too many people" if the Republicans get into power again.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 03:51 PM
1

Unfortunately, feminism has been spreading through church organizations lately. Those of us who are Christian, and recognize this, and are disgusted by it, call this "Churchianity". It's what happens when you trust the whims of the world over the scripture your religion is supposed to be built around.
/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 03:47 PM
1

Note that she also says "we could marry a lot of great guys who make more than us, or the same as us." ... never even considered "a lot of great guys who make less than us".
/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 03:39 PM
8

Most women can empathize with pain experienced by their young male children. That's species and tribe adaptive, and only the bad one's can't. In my opinion, excellent women are those who have learned to understand and empathize with the pain of other sorts of men, and be a help meet / supporter. And that's whether this due to rearing, cultural context, a higher than usual T count for a woman, or having been forced to be practical about a number of other things in her life to get what she wanted.…
/r/TheRedPill03/07/14 05:27 AM
1

I wonder that Lawyers are still considered high status except for their pay level. I would not allow one in my house.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/14 08:31 AM
1

And on top of all of that, feminists are lieing to both about how things are, and trying to make them into how they say things should be, by saying that it's just yucky "patriarchy" that's holding everything back.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/14 08:25 AM
2

Of course, as recent articles have pointed out, many women find men talking about said interests to be boring. http://www.the-spearhead.com/2014/06/02/middle-aged-journalist-blames-lack-of-love-life-on-brogrammers/ It really needs to be all about her (validation, beta bucks, etc), or thrilling exciting, pulse raising bad-boys (which, really, makes it all about her again).
/r/TheRedPill02/07/14 08:19 AM
3

To claim this is manipulation is like saying women who put effort into looking sexually attractive (makeup, hair, clothes) are trying to "manipulate" men to be attracted to them. Sounds like a fair cop. Either way, you know what drives a person, and are influencing that person's behavior using that knowledge and your own actions. This, taking the use of the word "manipulation" whereby I manipulate a door by turning the knob and pushing it open, and thus produce the result of it opening.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/14 06:56 AM
3

I'm not sure if you're being euphamistic about Voluntary Celebacy, but that too is a valid sexual strategy. It is the strategy where you don't play the game at all. You don't get the rewards (or a chance at them) but you also don't take the risks. So you are prioritizing other goals in life over the propagation of your genes.
/r/TheRedPill02/07/14 06:53 AM
2

Thanks for reminding me to go buy some stuff from Hobby Lobby.
/r/MensRights02/07/14 06:12 AM
2

I doubt there will ever be another draft though, so it's probably a non-issue. Then let's save some money and un-employ some sexists, and just cut the entire department. And to save more money on storage, just burn all the records.
/r/MensRights01/07/14 05:15 AM
3

Something something Crispian's day. :P
/r/MensRights01/07/14 05:14 AM
1

Prenuptial agreements lower risk. By how much is debatable, but they generally lower risk. I do not agree with this statement, and I don't see how you've established that they do.
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 03:35 AM
1

The bouncer in question in the original story certainly failed to provide a safe environment for the customers of the bar. If you're going to argue from your experience what the bouncer was probably thinking, giving the surrounding circumstances then be prepared, theoretically speaking, to be put in the position of that bouncer. Of course, providing a safe environment for the customer is not the purpose of a bouncer. The purpose of a bouncer is to preserve the revenues of the bar for his employe…
/r/TheRedPill01/07/14 03:30 AM
1

What makes you think the lawyer that draws up the pre-nup is going to be the same guy as the one who takes actual cases? If one of them is in the business of drawing up pre-nup contracts, then he's going to want everyone to think that pre-nup contracts are iron-clad, and is going to pull out a stack of cases where "it worked" while sweeping the ones that don't under the rug. It'd be against his financial interest to tell the truth. And lawyers are all supposed to be masters at manipulating "the …
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 03:58 PM
1

Which have rigorous studies and tests done showing that they are effective, and their effectiveness is based on physics, and body mechanics, rather than the oily slick of politics. Those producing the jackets have a financial interest in seeing the lives of their clients improved, while the longer a court case drags on the more money a lawyer makes, and the more lives destroyed, the more the anti-family court case makes. Your comparison breaks down in analysis.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 03:51 PM
1

You base your reasoning on your own interpretation of events you experienced. You already have trusted the person that has come to speak to you first multiple times. How many of those times have been entered as new datum, supporting your judgement with the outcome of said judgement? This is known as confirmation bias. Also, typically speaking, if a person is mistrusted by another human being, that person will view that other human as untrustworthy, rather than seeking the fault within himself. A…
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 03:38 PM
1

The number of men raped in court despite having them would seem to indicate that their advice is understandably biased in the direction of "give me money".
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 03:34 PM
0

While Molyneux does often make some interesting points, he's rather pedantic (he's better in this video than in some of the other ones I've watched portions of, though). In my opinion he is over-analyzing in this case, and one of his early and fundamental points his argument builds on is fundamentally flawed as a result. One of the reasons the human mind is such a powerful tool is that we can think the question "what if", and follow the results. For example: "What if I throw this rock at that be…
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 10:26 AM
0

It was a strait to video Disney Sequel (i.e. bad).
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 09:58 AM
2

Not a big fan of Poppin's attitude towards Mr. Banks, but I do like Burt's attempt to explain to the Banks children how much pressure Mr. Banks is under, and what he goes through for their comfort, out of love.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 09:56 AM
1

Aaand then movie 2 rolls around. I just could not sit and finish that Disney sequel. I find some of the director's commentary interesting, where they wanted to make her a "Strong independent woman" but found the story falling flat, until they take the main focus back to the original material, where she is a loving child trying to save her father's life.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 09:51 AM
3

The Federal government has already shown itself able to track bitcoin transactions through the public record. All they have to do is show transactions where in you gain bitcoins in exchange for one or more assets, and they can thereafter track activity with that account, and any other dummy accounts you own that you pass the money to. In fact, shuffling the money between accounts on your own just makes it more likely they'll pick up patterns that help them find any transactions you made to estab…
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 09:34 AM
4

And practise at ignoring pain, discomfort, etc, becoming dulled to it. As a generality, people who commit suicide honestly believe that they are un-needed, un-wanted, or making the world a better place by leaving it. Given the narrative on men in western culture, the higher suicide rate makes a lot of sense for a lot of reasons.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 09:25 AM
1

I've long said the two are similar. Women are more likely to start something, men are more likely to finish it.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 09:23 AM
2

Given that these organizations tend to have ranking schemes, I'm not interested in giving a representative selection of people from the male population rank over me, in such a social organization, especially when such rank seems arbitrary and artificial, or based on longevity (again, like a trade union). I'd much rather meet people at an event that provides a point of common interest, where if they have some greater power in our dynamic, it's because they know more than I do, and are voluntarily…
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 09:12 AM
1

I would never go to such a center. The last time I had a discussion with a woman from one, she outright blamed some male victims of reciprocal abuse, because "sometimes a woman will hit an abusive man to cause the attack to happen on her terms". Nor the cops, for so many reasons that should be familiar to people here by now. At this point it's me, my skills at diffusing conflict, my martial arts, and my gun. Also? Never going to co-habitate, never going to have sex, and I try to avoid being alon…
/r/MensRights30/06/14 09:01 AM
0

Then why did you give the dubious advise to use it as a prophylactic, rather than suggest he ask a lawyer if such a thing would be helpful in his jurisdiction? Of course, lawyers have a financial incentive to say "yes" even if the practical answer is "not really". There's also the fact that she can leave him without divorcing, establish residence in a jurisdiction that does not enforce prenups, and file for divorce there.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 07:00 AM
3

I see no point in joining an already established group full of old people and Victorian ideas. I've been repeatedly invited, and said no. I have friends, I can find more friends if I want to, and I don't need to pay membership dues, or go to mandatory meetings where they want oaths of secrecy to get it. Unless these groups have something to offer I can't get else-where, I see no reason to join. By your own admission, they're full of people whipped by feminists anyway, so why join a group and vol…
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 05:59 AM
10

the person who comes and talks to me first because usually they are the most honest. No, she's just the person with the most reason to think she can get enforcement to take her side. A lot of men don't trust enforcement any more for a good reason. The "first report in" bias does exist, as does the "trust the woman over the man bias", but both are biases.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 05:47 AM
14

Camera quality on security cameras is usually bad enough that cops can crystal-ball gaze anything they want into it.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 05:45 AM
6

Interesting analysis. As for me, I just don't bother paying people for the "privilege" of hanging out in a hell hole. If people want to meet me, they can meet me at places I like to go. And bars with assholes like this (customer or employee) aren't among them.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 05:42 AM
1

Inherently invalid with regard to children, disregarded whenever a judge feels it's not "equitable" due to the anti-family courts being "courts of equity" rather than courts of agreement enforcement.
/r/TheRedPill30/06/14 04:55 AM
1

"Selective Service", an example of euphimisitic political double-talk if ever there was one, should be eliminated. If a nation can't survive with an all volunteer force (including the ability to leave the military at a time of one's choosing, rather than being in for a specified number of years), should not continue to exist.
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:42 AM
1

I don't want a "dialogue" with feminists, especially one who comes here starting with a premise of "why what you think is wrong", instead of asking questions. If others do, that is up to them. Nor do I trust the political system any more on these issues. All it does is enact violence on me, and those like me, on the behest of those like you. People like you are the reason I will never trust a domestic violence shelter, or any authority figure, at least when it comes to violence, since they are i…
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:32 AM
2

Actually, any place that is being protected by the secret service, you can be arrested for protesting. Does it happen every time? No. But it can. And given the mission bloat of the secret service...
/r/MensRights30/06/14 04:27 AM
1

I swear, Hillary could be elected the next president and third-wave feminists will still complain about the "patriarchy" (and it will still be taught in universities). Well you've got Obama as PotUS, and you've still got the racial grievance industry churning, so yes, that's a pretty solid prediction.
/r/MensRights25/06/14 04:16 AM
3

They're a hate group that makes their money and political influence by labeling other groups as hate groups. Basically, they are a part of the cultural-Marxist grievance industry.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 09:58 AM
1

Yyyeah, not interested in a. Asking the government to grow further and do more harm. b. Giving my info to a petition site that has already been shown to be a complete joke even when the signatures are from the Democrat party base.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 09:55 AM
1

Thank you for the link. I may look into it later.
/r/TheRedPill21/06/14 09:45 AM
1

Whatever you, or they, think of homosexuals, or the stances that others hold on homosexuals, I'm still in the same position. I still fail to see the relevance.
/r/MensRights21/06/14 09:44 AM
1

Do you have shelter from the elements? Do you have food that keeps you from starving and allows you to follow your natural growth cycle? Do you have clothing to keep you from being naked and exposed to the elements when you leave your shelter? When you are sick with the fever, can you get medicine? These are the needs that money can provide for. Things beyond this can be quite helpful. They can be quite nice. But they are not intrinsic to survival. Even if we stipulate paper and some #2 pencils …
/r/MensRights16/06/14 08:45 AM
2

Not getting married, not getting divorced, not having sex. If someone tires to claim I'm the father, I claim rape. Of course we've got bachelor taxes, and they're just getting worse over time.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 08:29 AM
–

Can you live on $430. per month and absolutely nothing else? That is a disingenuous question. The additional cost of the average child on top of the already incurred cost of a parent is far less than the cost of a single individual living alone. Rent is already covered. Or, if you prefer to expand beyond actual needs, you have a single additional room to rent. Heating/cooling would barely be increased to keep said room heated/cooled. The major individual costs would be food and clothing. If anyt…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 08:25 AM
3

Current example right here. Voluntary celibate (no, really) with no plans to marry who reads the forum for the social cometary, and the aid for dealing with social dynamics.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 04:34 AM
2

Then you might want to look at the fall of the Roman Empire, and their slut parades.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 04:28 AM
1

That's 16% of a population who die violently over the course of the lives of the population, not yearly. So you'd need to divide by the average life expectency absent violence (which was the major reason primitive populations had shorter life-spans). So for nice round numbers, divide by 100 to get 510 thousand every year. If you prefer to divide by 50 instead, that'd be roughly 1 million every year. Of course, for all I know Lumen isn't from the US.
/r/TheRedPill16/06/14 04:23 AM
6

Given that I fed, and am feeding a troll... maybe. I should get tested for that.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 03:44 AM
8

Why? I'll be too old to have children. I'll be able to travel the world with friends and family. I'll have the ability to enjoy books and tai chi and all sorts of leisure.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 03:43 AM
1

Current "case law" says it is. And people wonder why many people do not trust the courts.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 03:34 AM
8

I have friends and family, some of them women, so I have companionship of both sexes. I have a well paying job that I enjoy more than most people enjoy theirs. I live in a home that is as large as I need, and as well kept as I prefer, rather than being nagged to keep it to the preferences of others, and I can afford to maintain it. I know how to cook well, and mend. I can even have orgasms all by myself, as shocking as that seems. Except for 2 things, I have everything people keep saying I need …
/r/MensRights16/06/14 03:28 AM
–

Except if they "decide they need to talk to you", they "can search you for their safety". This got so abused in New York that there are finally some court cases that might reverse this. Edit: "their, not your"
/r/MensRights16/06/14 03:19 AM
2

This is one of the reasons I was so very conflicted about declining to go to my father's house for Father's Day.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 02:50 AM
2

Troll. Got it.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 02:29 AM
8

Well, because it's the right thing to do, generally, but I see your point about discouraged fathers. This sort of thing is why I'm celibate, and will never marry.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 02:26 AM
0

Is this sarcasm or trolling? I can't tell.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 02:24 AM
1

The parents of these children are the children of his new wife. It's not a choice between friends and family. It's all extended family internal. I don't know your father, he may have a problem with it, or maybe his new wife, but from what you have said it sounds like he's just trying to let you know that people are talking behind your back, and that you need to be careful. This probably isn't about house rules, but rather him trying to protect your from your self. I am rather conflicted about th…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 02:07 AM
1

spend father's day with your father. A bit late for that, I'm afraid. when asked to play by the kids, tell them that you would love to play with them but unfortunately you were told that the way you guys have played in the past was considered inappropriate. Further, if they wish additional explanation, then to ask their parents. A fair enough plan, if I'm to be around them any more... but quite honestly, given both my own discomfort, and the boring lack of anything to do that entertaining the ch…
/r/MensRights16/06/14 02:02 AM
–

Are you gay? I'm not sure why that'd be relevant, but no.
/r/MensRights16/06/14 02:00 AM
–

If he agrees that he needs to document everything, wouldn't he just be better getting out?
/r/MensRights29/05/14 04:58 AM
3

Better yet, bring up specific examples. Catherine II of Russia (often called Catherine the Great) is a good one. Not only were Russia's wars of expansion under her watch particularly relevant given Russia's current and recent expansionist tendencies, she also had her husband assassinated. In particular, you might want to bring up Potempkin conquering Crimea on her orders.
/r/MensRights16/05/14 04:33 AM
5

No, no, she said that all mean do these things, so that must include her husband. Funny. I don't rob, beat, or rape. I don't cheat on a sexual partner either, because I don't have one! Why, according to this woman, either I don't exist, or I'm a woman too. Do I get special minority status for scholarships and sentencing disparities now too?
/r/TheRedPill20/03/14 02:32 AM
10

Suicide and Domestic Violence display differences between the sexes quite similarly. Women are more likely to start it, men are more likely to finish it.
/r/TheRedPill14/03/14 01:51 AM
1

I am not aware of the poem, but it sounds like an interesting one.
/r/MensRights13/03/14 11:58 AM
1

Indeed. Also, there are studies that have concluded that handling weapons improves testosterone levels. Knowing you can defend yourself is also a general confidence booster.
/r/TheRedPill13/03/14 04:02 AM
1

In school we talked less about it as a warrior's code. That's pretty typical since that's what most people think of now. Holding of doors, secret signs with gloves or umbrellas, etc. But examples of the warrior code included capturing knights from an opposing army if you can, accepting their surrender. You'd then ransom them. If there was a difficulty in raising the funds, you'd release your fellow noble to go back to his lands and work his serfs and tax his peasants to pay for his freedom. It i…
/r/MensRights13/03/14 03:54 AM
1

You might be interested in http://www.thesurvivalpodcast.com/
/r/TheRedPill12/03/14 03:01 AM
5

And don't forget to practise with it. A gun without ammo is an expensive club. A person with a gun he doesn't know how to use is a danger to himself and others -- or at the very least, his tool is useless to him.
/r/TheRedPill12/03/14 02:55 AM
0

Chivalry was a warrior's code that was a part of the feudal system, to which more and more non-warrior expectations were added over time. Asking if a different culture "still values" chivalry would be like a fellow from Japan asking an American if their people "still value bushido". There are some corollaries that can be drawn, and people might choose to translate the rough concepts by ignoring the differences, but these are different cultural codes.
/r/MensRights12/03/14 02:46 AM
1

Done. Thanks for the catch.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 12:29 PM
1

Alright then. That wasn't clear. Thank you for clarifying.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 12:21 PM
2

And to me, my time is worth more than the experience I'd get at such a place. You'd have to pay me with some valuable resource to go to one. Perhaps I'm trying to duck a Triad. Perhaps it's where a deal of monumental proportions will go down. Perhaps I'm being offered the place. Realistic? No. But neither is the chance of my going into one of those clubs.
/r/MensRights11/03/14 05:06 AM
1

I was using quotation marks due to active skepticism, but being open to information if the person I was conversing with had some to offer. After all, we hear all the time that "feminism helps men too!"
/r/MensRights11/03/14 04:57 AM
2

It depends on the woman. Some female bosses approach the role as "team mom". Similarly, some male bosses approach the role of boss much like they would the role of father-figure, or coach. They try to get good performance by helping their employees to reach their potentials, and stay on target. These are the people who get a role as a manager because they are good at getting people to like working hard for them. They improve production due to an honest concern not only for said production, but t…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 04:15 AM
1

Let me be perfectly clear. I prefer that no one is ever raped, in or out of prison. My position is that focusing on reducing dumbass laws that unnecessarily increase the prison population (something we should do anyway), will have the direct and practical benefit of reducing the number of prison rapes. I also, personally, think that this tactic is going to get more results than trying to convince the public at large to care about an issue that is currently the butt of jokes. This is not cherry p…
/r/MensRights11/03/14 03:31 AM
2

Even under the assumption that studies (rather than just surveys) show such tendencies, and don't have scientific biases, tendencies and "everyone" are two very different things. Further, even if we assume you are entirely correct in making this association, it's still an Ad Hominem. It is addressing the characteristics of those you disagree with, rather than their argument, or the argument you are trying to support. It's often an effective distraction/deflection, as well as an effective appeal …
/r/MensRights11/03/14 03:25 AM
1

Don't you know, though, International Women's day has nothing to do with feminism! It's all about women and not feminist's political posturing at all. Just like VAWA. It has "woman" in the title, not "feminist"! Sheesh. /s
/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 03:13 PM
2

Right, just like Obama getting the presidency shut down any discussion of America being racist. /s
/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 03:10 PM
1

Nice use of sarcasm there.
/r/TheRedPill10/03/14 03:06 PM
–

Further, all progressive, educated, scientifically literate people will automatically support choice. Replace the word "progressive" with "ethical", and I might choose to make the same comment about supporting life over killing. But of course if we actually have this discussion, it's hardly on the main topic, and people have repeatedly blasted me, before for "derailing" a topic. I'm also aware I'm unlikely to make headway on a firmly committed stance in an internet argument. So while I can engag…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 02:38 PM
2

Well, according to your particular 3-group paradigm, I (an actual person with Aspergers) hover somewhere between "sperg" and "cynic". I try to produce the value that I need to reliably sustain myself, but I'm not out for the corrupt aspects of society. I help others, but I choose who I help selectively. And often, due to the corruption I see all around me, I honestly wonder if I'm making even the smallest dent in anything. I've abandoned the main streams of culture whole-cloth, but am trying to …
/r/AlreadyRed10/03/14 07:52 AM
1

Well one vector to reducing the exposure to this problem is to reduce dumbass laws that send people to prison that don't need to be on the books in the first place. I've already chosen that as my solution vector for this problem, as it solves so many others as well, and is more likely to get a sympathetic ear.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 07:26 AM
–

Regarding Point 2: This sub, and the MRM as a movement are diverse politically. While the movement may not, as a whole, oppose planned parenthood, it is not my understanding that the movement, as a whole, supports it either.
/r/MensRights10/03/14 05:17 AM
2

This is like when people mention the suicide rates among men and suggest that the rate among women should be higher rather than lowering the rate among men. The closest often seen suggestion I can imagine you reading, and twisting around in your head is the idea that if women want to make the same as men, as far as median pay (over all full time workers) goes, then not only should they work as many hours as men do, they should also take the same risks men do, which includes not only running star…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 05:11 AM
11

Well if you dislike feminists, obviously you oppose everything they support. While there is some cross over between MRAs or MGTOW and political movements like the Tea Party, it's relatively rare. The MRA, if anything, leans more toward either libertarianism or progressivism. Now I, for one, disagree with the re-labelling of the killing of unorn children as "reproductive rights", but I'm fairly unusual in that regard, as far as members of this board go. This is particularly evident given how ofte…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 04:58 AM
1

They've taken multiple swings at changing their image, but the fact remains that the vast majority of their services performed, by cost or time of the service, are directly related to abortions. A single visit for an abortion can also generate nearly a dozen other services which are listed separately. I was previously aware that they handed out condoms. Each condom they hand out is counted as a service when they publish materials to distance themselves from their primary revenue and activity str…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 04:37 AM
0

You made claims. I asked for clarification and information. I did not demand them. You repeated claims from marketing materials. When I found out, I said "never mind", thus revoking any request for you to do anything. This means I'm going to let my existing research stand, which says that I can't trust that which is published by Planned Parenthood due to their tendency to lie, exaggerate, or abuse statistics, and that I may do further research on my own in the future. Why on earth are you so ups…
/r/MensRights10/03/14 04:34 AM
-5

Oh, you were just reading the website, instead of talking from experience? Never mind then. Edit: And for your info, reading marketing materials doesn't generally qualify as research.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 04:39 PM
0

Interesting. So what is the format of this "support"?
/r/MensRights09/03/14 04:19 PM
0

feminism is about equality for women The part of your post I must disagree with.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 04:11 PM
0

Okay, that you're going to need to explain for me. What do they do that's so great for men?
/r/MensRights09/03/14 03:53 PM
8

Actually, early feminists read Marx, and many of the programs feminism wants were tried under early soviet communism until Stalin did away with them because they were bankrupting the state. Marxism contains some of the early seeds of feminism, and cultural Marxists in the Frankfurt school further refined the group-warfare to focus on race and sex. Feminism is a form of cultural Marxism, which is the mainstay of the progressive movement. Now, if you talk about classical liberty, and thus classica…
/r/MensRights09/03/14 03:51 PM
15

I didn't even make it to any making fun of the guy, except that the latina was saying she usually went for beefy macho guys. Unless you count referring to himself as a male, instead of a man. As you said, awkward, not funny. The only SNL I've ever enjoyed in any of it's incarnations were specific famous skits I was linked to, and even then, it wasn't as funny as most of the comedy I watch. But this... it was just bad. Wow.
/r/MensRights09/03/14 03:46 PM
1

There's a reason I don't tell my potential employers that I have a recognized disability, and it's not because I'm afraid of discrimination.
/r/MensRights08/03/14 01:56 AM
12

In which case they are legally required to sexually discriminate, but forbidden from appearing to sexually discriminate. Similar to not being able to post a "blacks only" sign, but being required to hire more blacks to make the quota.
/r/MensRights07/03/14 01:51 AM
2

And on top of that, we focus more and more on process (or worse, memorization and repetition), rather than skills, and intuitive understanding of materials. This is worst in poorer communities, which is one of the reasons that boys in poorer communities are under-served. Girls do better with memorization than boys do, boys find it particularly boring. So we're exacerbating the situation on multiple angles. Further, the natural rough-and-tumble that boys enjoy is punished even in playground play …
/r/TheRedPill06/03/14 04:00 AM
2

You're not addressing the underlying reason for my argument, though. It is that not having men able to be able to deal with not having sex is mal-adaptive for a community. If men couldn't deal with not having sex, then many "creepy" men that can't get sex would eventually wind up being the murdering rape-monsters feminism imagines men to be. The societal chaos would lead to the self-destruction of a community, or at the very least prove a drain on the community, allowing other communities to out…
/r/AlreadyRed06/03/14 03:53 AM
2

Well first of all, Darwin's particular theory has been disproven several times over, and evolutionary theory has moved on, just as most Psychologists aren't Freudians. But to reply to your main point, based on current theories on evolution, I'll point to the heroic man who sacrifices himself for his family, whether be it his wife and children, or his brothers and sisters and uncles and aunts. Genes that he has in common with them continue to be passed down. This is how evolutionists (particularl…
/r/AlreadyRed05/03/14 03:00 PM
7

Not to mention that female public school teachers are more likely to diddle boys than the catholic priests are.
/r/AlreadyRed05/03/14 02:47 PM
13

little girls behave by default In part because the behavior that is considered "behaving" has been tailored to fit feminine behavior.
/r/TheRedPill05/03/14 02:32 PM
15

Don't forget swords. Swords are awesome. And if boys that are violent are often rejected, bullied, etc... wouldn't a rejection of their masculine impulses and bullying by teachers make shooting events more likely rather than less?
/r/TheRedPill05/03/14 02:28 PM
6

Many (though perhaps not all) feminist leaders and hardliners are angry Lesbians -- some of whom, I suspect, are reacting to poor rearing, or actual rape in the past. Why would they want men of any kind?
/r/TheRedPill05/03/14 02:26 PM
1

Laws and rights are quite often at odds.
/r/MensRights05/03/14 06:53 AM
1

I don't agree in either scenario. I believe in the individual's right of association, and to set the terms under which that person is willing to associate (which includes conducting business).
/r/MensRights04/03/14 04:58 AM
2

If men are usually the abusive ones in a relationship Already a poor assumption. That's not the case. Approx 50% of domestic partner violence is reciprocal. When it's not, the woman is abusing the man 70% of the time. Mothers are more likely to abuse their children as well. Lesbian households have higher domestic violence rates than heterosexual or gay households. Domestic violence is like suicide. Women are more likely to start something, men are more likely to complete it.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 08:55 AM
0

When used in an uncontrolled or unpredictable fashion, yes. When part of a wide spectrum of punishments, no. And I can think of such a circumstance. If a child too young to reason tries to run into the street after an animal or a toy, a firm swat to the rear or two, to associate pain with the potentially deadly danger can keep the child safe in the long term.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 08:49 AM
1

And people wonder why domestic violence rates are so much higher in police families.
/r/MensRights01/03/14 08:47 AM
2

If they said "black only" it definitely would be, and there's plenty of them with college scholarships.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 03:30 AM
2

So why do those fields want women in particular? Because of "preconceived notions" pushed by feminism. Otherwise they'd be happy to get kids of any sort in.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 02:58 AM
5

The rosy the riveter arm-pumps were pretty blatant.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 02:11 AM
1

Try turning it around, and it'd be called misogynistic. Spreading stuff like this just reinforces the culture.
/r/MensRights28/02/14 02:04 AM
1

Cool cool.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 12:53 PM
–

Ahhh. Got it. Have you considered linking to this article in that thread? If you're a subscriber to that other sub, I mean.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 12:38 PM
–

Actually, inside the article I linked itself it did mention the boys were the ones targeted. Just not in the title, like it usually does for women or girls.
/r/MensRights27/02/14 12:18 PM
6

You just went a long way toward mending fences on the hostility I've felt for this issue for a while now. The ignoring of men and boys being trafficked, and blaming human trafficking for all prostitution by females (and thus justifying penalizing johns but not whores) are huge reasons I've turned a deaf ear to this issue for years now. For a long while now, most of the articles I've seen on this were so obviously bullshit, I assumed most of it was. I'm actually going to look into your sub, and i…
/r/MensRights26/02/14 10:35 AM
1

Teachers have the endorsement of the government as people in charge of their students. They have the ability to punish directly, as well as through grades, and have the ability to affect not only if you are going to serve detention or get suspended, but one's future through those grades.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 10:28 AM
6

The majority of victims and the majority of perpetrators are men. I acknowledge both of these facts. That does not negate the effect that the majority of victims are men. Nor does it negate the fact that the perpetrators are usually a relatively small minority of the people of that culture. Nor is it a part of our western narrative that in wars, women on both sides of the conflict face less danger than the men do. Yet we keep hearing about men being monsters as a sex, and women being victims as …
/r/MensRights26/02/14 06:45 AM
6

I am encouraged that this story mentions the sexes specifically, since it was what the terrorists used to determine who would live or die.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 06:41 AM
–

Yeah, damn those men, and their privilege of getting killed. Or something.
/r/MensRights26/02/14 03:38 AM
2

I find that it's easier to stick with an activity that I enjoy that is exercise, than to do exercise I don't already enjoy that has strain and difficulty. To get him into exercise, it might be good to find out what his interests are, and pick one that is exercise. Get the wife behind him doing this activity, rather than complaining if he tries to follow up on it, and he's more likely to keep going, and enjoy it. An important point here is that it's exercise he wants to do, for a variety of reaso…
/r/TheRedPill25/02/14 07:36 PM
5

it's not at all natural to want a girlfriend who "watches what she eats". ... ... so it's more natural to want someone who stuffs her face full of potatoe chips or something?
/r/TheRedPill25/02/14 07:24 PM
1

After all of those "lost, forlorn" looks with "no one doing anything", I had enough. Not in the "I'm outraged in her situation" way they intended, but at the bad acting and directing.
/r/MensRights25/02/14 06:57 PM
1

I don't either, but sometimes I save a link. Other people save links sometimes too. Not wanting to do probably inconsequential research to look into someone's point, but being interested in doing the reading if the material is available in a format that makes a worth-while outcome more likely is not being lazy. It's having rational time priorities. The name calling isn't even remotely necessary.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/14 06:08 PM
1

If I read articles on debunking, and disagree that it's been debunked, how do I know I've read the stuff you think debunks it? Maybe I missed the right articles. I'm not demanding you do work for me, just asking if you have any links to hand already.
/r/TheRedPill25/02/14 02:09 PM
4

I wish this kind of thinking was rare enough that I could believe this was a parody.
/r/MensRights24/02/14 07:31 AM
1

Any links handy on his study, and it being debunked?
/r/TheRedPill24/02/14 06:20 AM
8

A betting man wouldn't put a cent on a woman being loyal to a man. Depends on the woman, the time period, and the odds offered.
/r/TheRedPill24/02/14 06:15 AM
7

In response to the original video: By nearly every measure, young men are failing to adapt to contemporary life. Ahahahaha. No. Those aren't objective measures for ability to adapt. Those are objective measures of how much young men are performing for the culture at large. Often, opting out of a paradigm is a form of adaption. In general, men tend to perform as well, or as poorly as the women in their lives permit. As far as what society as a whole, or women, want. Not according to what the men …
/r/TheRedPill24/02/14 06:13 AM
0

From an Ethical, Moral, or Legal standpoint? Those are 3 different questions, and depend on the system of laws, the population who's morals you're querying, and the system of ethics. But since none of that was specified by the person I replied to, I answered according to the morals of the group I operate in, the system of ethics to which I ascribe (there's a reason these two are similar), and the written laws in my jurisdiction (though judicial rulings and lawsuit juries muddy the question of le…
/r/MensRights24/02/14 05:03 AM
–

If it's not okay for an out-group to use the phrase, it's not okay for the in-group to use it. If it's okay for an in-group to use it, it's okay for an out-group to use it. So if you're not okay with black folks calling you a honkey or a cracker, don't use the phrase yourself. Same thing with "nigger". As for what's "PC"... why is that even worth a discussion?
/r/MensRights24/02/14 12:13 AM
1

I'm rejecting your mockery.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 06:02 PM
1

Ah. Argument through mockery. How... "nice".
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 05:40 PM
1

I agree that our current situation is untenable, and that it'd be easier to make prostitution legal than fix our society's take on marriage. I think that it is unlikely that we will be able to reverse the clock and return to a period of true monogomy, with sex rolls meeting any traditional set of definitions. I was just bringing up additional consequences. I find it highly likely that we are in the death-throws of the lifecycles of civilizations, particularly at the global level. Just take a loo…
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 05:00 PM
1

While I agree with that statement, you obviously don't. None-the less, if you discard my above statements because I am religious, that is a severe logical fallacy, known as "Ad homonym", where a quality of one of the arguers not relevant to the current discussion is used to discard his statements or viewpoints. Also, note that I didn't say we shouldn't legalize prostitution. I was providing information on additional consequences, and leaving it to you to decide based on the totality of informati…
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 04:52 PM
1

And inflation is where it is in large part due to printing money to pay off debt-based spending. Increasing the minimum wage also increases inflation further, making it an impotent hamster-wheel for politicians to run-on. If you want to nip inflation in the bud, stop unnecessary deficit spending. Don't use military resources when it won't secure the country's safety. Limit your "social programs" to the starving and homeless. Cut any department at the federal level that can be handled by the stat…
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 04:49 PM
1

didn't the President recently have to raise the minimum wage? Have to? No. He chose to sign an executive order, which may well be against the separation of powers, stating that any newly bid government contract must pay no less than $10.10 / hour. Given that there are hardly any contractor employees making minimum wage as it is, this is more of a symbolic gesture than a practical one, and may technically be illegal.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 04:26 PM
0

Lie to yourself if you want to. Just don't expect us to support it.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 04:15 PM
1

Personally, I'd say that pro-gamers would do better in the entertainment or animation industries, experience-wise, than as a programmer or mathematician (unless they have to do loads of calculations themselves to make optimal choices), as far as experience goes. Just take a look at rooster-teeth. Maybe as a cable-runner.
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 04:02 PM
1

Also, since monogamous marriage is acknowledged as a bedrock of civil society, and this further encourages the break-down of monogamous marriage, legal prostitution tends to feature prominently in the death-stage of any mighty civilization. Prostitution would also increase the spread of disease, unless frequent testing was required, and getting an STD got a girl's license revoked. Even in that scenario, given the amount of time it takes between the stage she can re-infect and the stage she will …
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 04:00 PM
1

Save that single women are more likely to get the deduction, which kicks them into the lower bracket, and young professional women still consume health care at a higher rate than young professional men even if they don't get pregnant. Further, younger professionals tend to be in lower tax-brackets already due to having less experience. As a result, given current marriage rates, you're going to have more men without kids paying higher taxes than women without kids, due to who gets assigned kids i…
/r/TheRedPill23/02/14 03:41 PM
7

Male biology may factor in there as well. Keep in mind, some people born with male plumbing have double-x, due to the way hormones worked in the womb, or a mutation. This is an exceedingly rare case, of course.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 03:27 PM
1

Well, if you assume that the man is not included in what he protects, or his family. I'm not married, I don't have kids. But I still provide for myself and protect myself. I also have my parents and siblings to worry about, but to a lesser degree, because they do the same.
/r/MensRights22/02/14 03:24 PM
3

So are you saying that after the advent of artificial wombs, those who are born from them with real human DNA won't be actual humans?
/r/MensRights22/02/14 03:23 PM
2

Ah yes. "Real man" stuff. Again. Quite frankly, any "man" who isn't somehow faking the fact that he's a man (see: Plays by Shakespeare) is a real man. On the other hand, it is worth-while discussing what it means to be a good man, and what it means to be a man who is good at being a man (usually referring to the traditional or natural strengths of men). Some of the contents of this poster speak well to one aspect or another. 2 and #8, for example, speak to both. But then, it also applies to wome…
/r/MensRights22/02/14 03:14 PM
2

Or handing out rebuttal papers to fellow students.
/r/MensRights21/02/14 06:09 AM
0

Given that a large segment of the population is known to very violently disagree, I'd disagree.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 04:07 PM
2

You're welcome. I'm glad you found the post insightful. I hoped people would, and that's why I wrote it. As I said previously, that was abbreviated. There's more that I had to go through, but it wasn't particularly relevant to the point. But yes, I'm in a much better place now. I posted a few of my successes to help give evidence to that fact. Thank you for your concern and sympathy.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/14 04:06 PM
2

Given that other men have hand-size limitations, I highly doubt this is an issue of discrimination based on sex, so much as it is on hand-size, even if we take her account to be true, at least as far as the gun. And I agree that allowing for reasonable variation that does not compromise the safety of others is a laudable goal. It actually increases the pool of applicants so that you can draw better applicants. A woman who fails to clear a 3 foot fence probably isn't one of them, but meh. However…
/r/MensRights20/02/14 10:23 AM
2

Wow, two links, no discussion. That really motivates me to continue discussing things with you. I'll take a look anyway, as I'm curious, and links are good. Specifically looking at the G19/G17. Yep, they've mitigated issues with the size of the grip with customizable grip technology. I'm glad to see the advancements. That'll put a good platform in a wider variety of hands. However, that doesn't negate my point that there are engineering reasons for certain minimum dimensions for a given round. T…
/r/MensRights20/02/14 09:10 AM
1

That would be a point in favor of the idea /u/dolandoes is arguing against. You, likewise, may want to further support the point you've made. Note, I'm not disagreeing. I'm just saying that stating a point and supporting it are different things.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 08:27 AM
1

Other societies have found it useful to punish false witnesses with the same punishment the accused could have faced. Since this is not a legal / societal concept that is as widely panned as slavery (which I personally dislike), you may want to establish your points against it, rather than assuming people will just agree with you that it's a bad idea.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 05:59 AM
-1

This seems like an earnest and honest question asked with a desire to know. As such, I'll attempt to answer. I doubt anger is the correct word for me. I would dislike the term being used, particularly if applied to me. It means he thinks the word is normal to use. It means he's probably a part of the SJW crowd, and probably hates me because of the demographic I'm in. The person using the term is likely an anti-white racists, and an anti-male sexists. In other words, if someone uses the label "ci…
/r/TheRedPill20/02/14 05:38 AM
11

I do (but I got better). Let me explain why. As someone with Aspergers Sydrome, I was quite awkward in my youth (and still am to a degree). I was subjected to a fair amount of bullying, including by some of my female teachers. Society in general told me that my honestly kind, caring, thoughtful nature was wrong in that men weren't ever like that. It told me my anger and aggression and protective instinct were wrong, because it was bad. It said that everything about me was wrong. Meanwhile, girls…
/r/TheRedPill20/02/14 05:27 AM
3

I did. Once. He was all sorts of messed up in the head.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/14 05:09 AM
2

Never mind that some employers would rather take a college dropout than someone with a degree in wymns stoodies.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/14 05:08 AM
6

Or cultural indoctrination. Thought and behaviour patterns have effects on hormones, and the structure of the brain. People who handle weapons and lift weights generate more testosterone, which undoubtedly has an effect on the brain.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/14 05:05 AM
0

Core mechanics and form of an interaction are not the meanings of words.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 04:43 AM
1

Which lets me brag about beating the system, which gives me credit. Or, I could just bring it out when buying drinks.
/r/MensRights20/02/14 04:41 AM
2

If we're talking a semi-automatic, actually, there are several engineering reasons. To start with, any given round will have a specific width and length. Those with larger length or width tend to have more stopping power. To that you must add the thickness of the magazine material, which must be durable. To that, you then add the casing for the magazine well. If not universally a part of the grip, it is near-universally a part of the grip, as this decreases the material needed for the gun, reduc…
/r/MensRights20/02/14 04:39 AM
1

Cops don't just deal with people in public, though. Cops burst into private property and arrest people, or toss everything in order to exicute a search warrant quite often.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 03:05 PM
1

Wow. Bad art, bad lettering, obviously not actual super hero stuff, not even a fig leaf covering it. I couldn't stand to give it more than a glance the quality was so obviously low.
/r/TheRedPill19/02/14 07:34 AM
2

That's a drug abuser for you.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 06:51 AM
1

I'm really very sorry to hear about your experiences as a child, and recently. Mine were not nearly as extreme, but some of the things you mention are very sadly familiar. I hope you've gotten any care you need for those old injuries, and also that you've gotten any health issues caused by the weight under control. I know I've got a lot to work on in the weight area myself. Thank you for sharing your story. I'm sure some people will have learned from it. I also hope it helped you to share it.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 06:44 AM
2

Honestly, when dealing with a corrupt cop, I'm surprised more people don't say "fuck it, if I'm going to get killed for suing him, I might as well take him and some other cops out with a bomb or something." I'm not saying do it. I'm just surprised more people don't.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 06:31 AM
1

I'm pondering the possibility of making those records public as a matter of course. On the one hand, it'd be a great way to let the public see the actions of the cop in such a controversy. On the other, it could well infringe further on the rights of individuals the cops deal with.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 06:29 AM
19

And this is an example of why, even before I found folks that also saw through this BS, I've been actively sceptical about phrases like "sexism", or "victim blaming", or "sexual assault" or "rape". I am similarly sceptical about the phrases "oppression" and "racism". To be sure, rape, and racism both exist. But the idea that a given outcome or action is the result of racism, unless it meets the definition on it's face, is something that I'll need evidence of. Affirmative Action? Sexism/Racism on…
/r/MensRights19/02/14 06:09 AM
1

No, they'd be going through the motions in order to gain or preserve political power, and use different means. The core mechanic and type of manipulation, though, is the same.
/r/MensRights19/02/14 04:21 AM
1

Thank you very much for the thorough explanation, it makes a lot of sense. You're quite welcome. In essence men are stealth taxed And in that it is not an explicit tax on men, yes, men are "stealth" taxed. Further, at least in the US, there tend to be tax deductions for the primary custodial parent of a child. The primary custodial parent tends to be a woman, if the parents aren't married (and thus filing jointly). Again, a further tax on men, based on other circumstances. In ancient Rome, near …
/r/TheRedPill19/02/14 04:20 AM
3

This actually leads to higher failure rates.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 08:52 AM
5

Or ethical.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 08:34 AM
4

I'm not sure it's white American women alone the consensus is about. I've seen a fair number of posts that black American women and native American women tend to have fairly large senses of entitlement as well. I have seen in Redpill/PUA and Mens Rights circles that that the black community acts as the canary in the coal mine as far as negative effects of feminism on the culture. It's a problem with the larger culture as a whole, even if different sub-cultures are sometimes affected differently.
/r/AlreadyRed18/02/14 08:21 AM
1

Actually... replace "desire to bump/grind" with "desire to gain political power / alliances", and I think that's what most princesses were in for... and a fair number of princes too.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 08:08 AM
1

You can't buy a person from them. That's illegal. They sell you an illusion about another person, and services for getting together with that person they sold you an illusion about.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 07:56 AM
0

Why would I have to have a girl, temporary or otherwise? Why can't I spend time with friends who actually value my company no matter who's paying for the activity? That seems like a far healthier source of validation to me.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 07:54 AM
3

The only thing I can think of to say in defence of this man is that if you want a live in girl-friend, the only way many (not all) renting companies will permit that is if you put that person on the lease, in order to make both of you financially liable.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 05:06 AM
4

Strength of frame, and leaderships qualities, the ability to be the head of the pack, are always qualities that can benefit a society, so long as social dominance is not vilified and purposefully ground under by coalitions.
/r/AlreadyRed18/02/14 04:43 AM
3

And the ring isn't even all that traditional, it's barely older than feminism. It was entirely invented by the DeBiers corporation to boost profits in a flagging market.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 03:29 AM
2

While the advice from "the hubster" isn't an absolute in reality (and general statements should not be taken as absolutes), it does make a pretty good rule of thumb. If you want the wife to stay at home and take care of the kids while you work extra hours, you're probably also the kind of guy who will pay for the first date (though not necessarily), and visa versa. Similarly, if you're going to completely reject the 9-to-5 job, and run a family farm, or be an entrepreneur that works out of his h…
/r/MensRights18/02/14 03:25 AM
1

It is, and he hasn't been brought in with a demand to trade sexual favors for continued employment. Yet. That we know of.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 03:07 AM
3

Very rarely any more, particularly in companies that rely heavily on STEM, but still need to meet government hiring quotas.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 03:06 AM
1

Or, to put it another way, just because one person in a fight is crazy or a dumbass, doesn't mean the others in the fight aren't crazy or dumbasses too?
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 02:39 AM
1

To make sure everyone on here knows men are inherently are stronger than women? I'm pretty sure even bluepillers accept that. I'm going to point to the people that say that women are just as capable (if not more so!) in combat situations, and advocate for hiring more women for the special forces... while also lowering physical fitness requirements. The acknowledgement can be quite inconsistent, even within the same person.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 02:37 AM
2

If you make a confession, real or false, you should do it through your lawyer, for the best deal possible, not to the cops.
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 02:33 AM
4

Certainly. First of all, due to social expectations and differences in their sex roles, and priorities, men tend to earn more money than women in general. Thus, unless you are taxed a flat amount rather than a flat percentage (or even worse, a graduated percentage), all tax burdens fall more heavily on men, than on women. Secondly, women consume health care resources at a greater rate than do men. If you require, by law, that men and women pay equal rates for health insurance (prohibiting compan…
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 01:53 AM
3

I'm talking probabilistically here. Presuming you are attcked by a woman out of control of herself, which option is more likely to get your rear thrown in jail waiting arraignment? Option 1: Put someone in a hold, and call for help in controlling the woman that attacked you. Option 2. Laying her out with a single punch that leaves her nose broken, and her face covered in blood before the attention of most witnesses is drawn to the scene?
/r/TheRedPill18/02/14 01:44 AM
0

Given that you aren't even showing comprehension of my most recent post, I see no reason to think that further explanation would have a positive effect. I'll just say that what meaning you choose to inject into another's writing, based on your pre-conceptions, is not the same thing as what that person wrote.
/r/MensRights18/02/14 01:41 AM
6

Socialized medicine does the same thing, only more so, and with more obscurement.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/14 05:39 PM
6

It's better for the economy as a whole (read: less fragile), if you save up your money and buy a smaller house with no debt. But most guys can't afford a house with 3+ bedrooms by the time their first born comes around without debt.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/14 05:38 PM
2

People respond to market signals / personal incentives. In previous generations, it was more self-advantageous to a man to get married and have kids than it is now. If a subgroup shifts it's choices following a shift in incentives, the shift in choices alone cannot be used as evidence of a shift in morality (toward being more selfish). If society as a whole shifted the incentives so that being a husband and father was more attractive of a choice, mainly by removing punishments for being a father…
/r/AlreadyRed17/02/14 04:58 PM
3

Martial arts training, in general, is just a good idea. Men are more likely to get physically assaulted by women. Soft-forms, and forms that involve holds, or pushes, can also be used to physically control a woman assaulting you without injuring her, thus decreasing your chances of being ass-raped in prison for it.
/r/TheRedPill17/02/14 04:21 PM
0

First of all, I said "within a given culture", which already acknowledges that there are different cultures, different lands, etc. I was doing a comparison within a given culture/nation. I will admit that I generalized my observations on correlation to suppose that the difference would operate similarly in other countries, relative to the average of the police in that country. But then, aren't you generalizing your experience in the nations you've lived in to America by assuming that gun ownersh…
/r/MensRights17/02/14 04:06 PM
-1

The point is that an armed sub-populous that protects it's rights of all kinds tends to have more polite cops than an unarmed populous, in any given culture. This is in part due to keeping a watch on the cop and not rolling over on every issue, and in part because the cops know that if they get too out of line, they might be going home in body bags. Then again, base-town cops tend to be complete jerks, due to having a complete inferiority complex, due to being unable to pull the "I'm in charge" …
/r/MensRights17/02/14 06:54 AM
1

So then it's also reasonable for parents of a child with gender dysphoria to send that child to therapy, eh?
/r/MensRights17/02/14 01:51 AM
10

But the truth is that a lot of men would like to dress sharply. I think the marketing companies would like us to "dress sharply". Most of the men I know wince and kvetch if you want them to wear a suit, myself included. Comfort, utility, and ease of maintenance over frills and overly-expensive brand names, thanks, at least for me and the guys I know. On the other hand, If there is one affectation I'd prefer but know I'd get mocked for, it's a neckerchief. The neckerchief/cravat is one of the ear…
/r/MensRights17/02/14 01:44 AM
0

Interesting. Very interesting. Tell me, what are the New Orleans gun laws? I suspect they are highly restrictive.
/r/MensRights17/02/14 01:39 AM
1

Not even remotely. Then again, which would you rather have, a card, or a side of sauted mushrooms and onions?
/r/AlreadyRed17/02/14 01:25 AM
2

Don't forget the cough syrup.
/r/AlreadyRed17/02/14 12:54 AM
2

In response to his question "Why isn’t there an official “fuck your boyfriend like a wild animal” holiday or a list of criteria to meet that’ll make his day special?" ... isn't that what steak and bj day is?
/r/AlreadyRed17/02/14 12:53 AM
3

I'd say that a man who disengages from our presently mainstream rampant materialism, and does non-standard charity work can be quite the force for good, personally.
/r/AlreadyRed17/02/14 12:47 AM
1

One technique I've heard is to decide what you're going to do, then invite a girl you think might enhance the experience along (unless it's a guy's group type thing). And if she accepts, great. If not, you're still doing something great. Either way, you don't loose your time going out to watch a movie you don't want to see, or the like.
/r/AlreadyRed17/02/14 12:41 AM
1

Studies have shown that handling a firearm increases testosterone levels. There are also CQC target shooting courses for real fire arms. While paintball sounds like fun, and something I'd be interested in mixing in to my MA training and hiking, I'd much rather train up my standing accuracy to the point I can do CQC runs and hunt if I have to choose a way to spend that time. Climbing and parkor (sp?) also make the list of physical activites I'd enjoy learning, once my weight drops enough to decre…
/r/AlreadyRed13/02/14 06:55 AM
1

So I could just pay $5, go down the street to get my hair cut, then come back to get some free booze?
/r/MensRights13/02/14 01:11 AM
6

I recall conversations with folks, both men and women who are shocked or "saddened" by the fact that I outright say I never plan to get married. And to a one, they can't give a reason for why I'd want to aside from "needing feminine energy to balance the masculine (out of the women in the USA? Fat chance) from the women. From the men, it's the idea that I can't understand how rewarding it is to be a husband or a father until I am one. And yet I see so many men who claim to be happily married who…
/r/TheRedPill13/02/14 01:01 AM
2

As I've said before, incels "opting" out of having sex holds as much weight as me opting out of high level political decision making. I can opt out of it, but I never had it to begin with, so what value or weight does me opting out hold? I'm pretty sure that rejecting sexual advances counts as a choice with consequences, even if you've never chosen to take someone up on them. Similarly, if you were nominated to chair the RNC, or DNC, even if you've never held political office, rejecting that nom…
/r/AlreadyRed13/02/14 12:17 AM
2

Get a grip. I have one. You, meanwhile, seem to be flying off the handle, and should be taking your own advice.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 11:57 PM
2

And keep in mind, not all provisions of chivalry were about women. In fact, most of them weren't. It was a warrior's code similar to Bushido, or the code you find in modern day special forces like the Seals or the Marines. The "help the women" thing came in stages. Some of it was based on what you owed other gentlemen when around their daughters when they weren't, possibly because they were off to war, while you were guarding the homeland. The rest of it came later, as a part of the romance move…
/r/TheRedPill12/02/14 02:58 AM
5

Just the images used in the article alone made me sick to my stomach. If dressing up like a butler to better be servile to a woman is a part of men striving to be "the best versions of themselves" they can be, I'm pretty sure the species is doomed.
/r/TheRedPill12/02/14 02:53 AM
9

First off, that's not the a figure for the cost of an adult to live. The figure he gave is the additional cost to care for a child above and beyond the costs of said adult. The two are completely different figures. To use an incomplete metaphor to make the point, the cost of buying a moon roof for your car is a different cost than buying the basic package of the car itself. Secondly, "The best" and "survival needs" are leagues apart. You're trying to equate the two, and spread an argument from o…
/r/MensRights12/02/14 02:25 AM
5

As I recall, it's 70% filed, 80% initiated (the 10% difference being covered by the wife convincing the husband to file for her).
/r/MensRights12/02/14 02:13 AM
15

... ... isn't that like asking "Can't Skeletor do anything about all the dastardly and dumb plots of Lockjaw"?
/r/MensRights12/02/14 02:11 AM
3

... ... ... It's as if people have no idea who the money intrinsically belongs to, and who is actually paying who. Here's a hint. The child is not making money. As such, he is never paying for anyone's anything. It's a reduction in the forced cash flow from the parent who earned it, to the child that didn't. You can argue such a flow is a necessity, but at least be honest about the direction of the flow when talking about changes in said flow. Sheesh.
/r/MensRights12/02/14 02:10 AM
1

I think part of the issue is that men think it feels powerful to be in the selector's seat when actually it's draining to be the one turning down people on a non-stop basis. There is such a thing as a situation where two different groups have two different burdens imposed on them, as a cost of entering a marketplace in two different roles. It doesn't mean that either of these burdens is not a burden. In each case, the burden is mostly voluntary, but only in that you don't need to take it on, if …
/r/MensRights12/02/14 01:58 AM
0

From my reading of edtastic's post, and my reading of yours, you look like you've completely missed the point of his post. The vast majority of women don't approach. As a result, a man's goal is to reliably find a partner of any sort (dating, sexual, marital), a man needs to make many many approaches, usually not more than 1 with the same woman. This then results in many individual women getting bombarded with attention from multiple quarters, some of which any individual woman will enjoy gettin…
/r/MensRights11/02/14 08:05 AM
2

"Deal with the fact that she's bombarded by sexual interest." "Which is why so many women feel free to act like total cunts when rejecting people." Or drawing arrows from other posters to the one saying that your feelings are your responsibility.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 07:51 AM
1

Because even if you assess it as probably being false, there is a fair chance it isn't. Similarly, I could be abusive to every person who ever posted claiming he or she had been raped... but if I did that, I'd be acting like a complete duche.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 06:55 AM
1

Well, given only examples of your writing, most people would agree with you.
/r/MensRights11/02/14 06:53 AM
1

I'm no more assuming that the ideas I'm promoting are the truth than are the people who want others to allow them to post their ideas, and avoid being "censored". I agree it's a natural inclination, but it goes both ways just as well.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 10:16 PM
1

The danger of censorship is that truth may be censored. Fair enough. But there are downsides, "dangers" if you will, to using your time and resources to further enable others to spread their ideas that you disagree with and then to debate with them. You have less time and resources to spread your own. And as such, the truth may be drowned out from lack of resources to spread it, and choked out by untruths and lies, to the point that no one can find it. A blog author who moderates comments choosi…
/r/MensRights09/02/14 06:15 PM
1

I am really sorry to hear about your loss.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 05:23 PM
3

You have absolutely no empathy what so ever do you? I mean, you could have asked the same question, and challenged the same assumptions, but been far more gentle and tactful about it. Wow. You've just convinced me more than ever that Feminists are inherently horrible people. I think I'm going to go donate to a men's shelter or something after your post. Just... wow.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 05:21 PM
1

Well, according to some posts I've read over at /r/TheRedPill, generally speaking a woman will tend to feel far more empathy toward her own progeny, which she considers more intrinsically "hers" than she does her husband or father... But this doesn't explain male feminists. Also, honestly, I've seen all sorts of horror stories about what it was like to grow up with feminist parents, be the child male or female, so I'm not so sure it's about who the feminist does or doesn't claim.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 05:19 PM
2

She did come across as intelligent, at least to me. She also came across as spending far more work on this post than most people do.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 05:16 PM
0

In a formal debate, or writing a paper? Sure. On the other hand, there is no formal or inherent burden on someone on the internet writing a post to do even more work than the work they've already done. It'd be nice, but they have no inherent burden or obligation to do so. You may choose to be unconvinced due to the lack of citation, that's your choice, and a perfectly valid one. You don't need to provide evidence to back up your scepticism, you can just choose to be sceptical. It's all good. Att…
/r/MensRights09/02/14 05:11 PM
1

How much are you paying me in the private organization you're creating or, alternatively, what other benefit does your private organization provide to make it worth the change in my behaviour and pattern of speech? I "suit down, shut up, and do what [someone tells me]" every work day, and any time I go to self defense training.
/r/MensRights09/02/14 04:55 PM
2

Shrugs I'm not going to fault people for this position, which can probably be traced back to well before Marx's writing. You seem to be under the impression that the truth, and the best argument inevitably win out, and on a reasonable time scale. However, the skill, force of personality, and prevalence of a message can have a large impact on the acceptance of said statement. Con men, cult leaders, and politicians take advantage of this fact of human nature all the time. A person can have absolut…
/r/MensRights09/02/14 12:36 AM
1

No, that's not the intent of the law. If the intent of the family court system of law was to benefit the children, it would look extremely differently. It's intent is to benefit mothers, and court officers. The stated intent is merely an excuse to make the system more palatable, and play on a natural desire to think that one's society is just and fair, rather than abusive. Now, if you would like to try to prove your statement about the intent of the anti-family court system this truth, you can g…
/r/TheRedPill09/02/14 12:29 AM
1

Yeeeah, that's one of my big problems with "income inequality" and "socialization" commentaries. If the only way to get justice is to buy it, forbidding people from buying it to bring everyone down to the same level just makes everything more horrid. I'd rather some people have decent lives, than everyone's lives are equally horrid. We already have some socialization of the legal (not justice) system, in that we have public defenders. If they cannot do a competent job due to barriers thrown in e…
/r/MensRights09/02/14 12:21 AM
1

Done. That was an error that crept in due to repeated re-wording of my post. Thank you.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 01:42 AM
8

If I and my neighbor would rather use a 3rd party for resolution of our conflict, and agree to this third party arbitration, why does it matter if we agree to go to a rabbi, a priest, or a secular adjudicating agency? The credit card companies require 3rd party adjudication as a condition of their contracts. Why can't citizens get access to the same resources corporations use?
/r/MensRights08/02/14 01:31 AM
1

As an entirely theoretical exercise, I wonder what she'd do if I hired a woman to come forth and claim that this authoress raped her. Would the authoress believe the hired false accuser? I doubt it.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 01:29 AM
8

It's also unjust to disallow a person to rigorously defend himself, using as much or as little of his own resources as he so chooses. They are his resources after all. If anything, this is an indictment of the legal system being overly costly and complex, and a reason to take a machete (or even a chain saw) to the size of the law, to make it easier for the average citizen, or a single lawyer (rather than a huge team of lawyers) to competently defend the defendant. Arranging for a competent defen…
/r/MensRights08/02/14 01:20 AM
1

There is a school of thought that says that if you provide a private platform for a perspective and specifically choose to approve a post or comment for publication, you endorse it to one degree or another, if only in it's legitimacy as a perspective. I can definitely understand the desire not to endorse, or be seen as endorsing, a perspective that you disagree with vehemently.
/r/MensRights08/02/14 01:18 AM
1

It's guidelines are wrong but if a child's parent/carer receives more money the overwhelming majority of cases that child's life will be improved even slightly. Then I ask... "so what?" If the system is wrong, and makes the life of the non-custodial parent worse by impinging on his basic rights, to what net good does the system improve the life of the child slightly?
/r/TheRedPill07/02/14 04:26 AM
1

Drunk calories don't make you feel full, unless dairy/fat is involved. Since much of a person's eating is done based on hunger, simply cutting calorie carrying drinks, but continuing to eat what you want to eat when hungry can make a huge difference. This isn't just coke, but also sobe, Mt. Dew, sweet tea, etc. Snickers or Payday, having protein and physical substance to them, are far more likely to reduce your consumption of other foods than an equivalent amount of coffee with sugar. Of course …
/r/TheRedPill07/02/14 03:23 AM
12

There are many other things that are in the best interests of the child, that the anti-family court system refuses to make standard, because it's against current societal expectations. It's in the best interests of the child to live with both their mother and father in a non-abusive relationship. Failing that, in the case of rare divorce only due to adultery or abuse, it's best for the child to at least stay in the house of the non-abusive parent, rather than the abusive one. But see... that's n…
/r/TheRedPill06/02/14 06:05 AM
0

Well yes, but the things it touches and turn into big steaming piles of fecal matter can still form the basis of new growth, if feminism is removed from the vicinity.
/r/MensRights06/02/14 04:22 AM
5

Oh, I totally agree with that point. I'm just making sure this point gets acknowledged in the discussion. There's a 'reality' show where people spend literally thousands of dollars on a wedding dress they will buy only once, even if the dress is on sale, at a New York Boutique. Then there is all of the Disney Princess crap, and the advertising about weddings that says that it's her day. For many girls, it's a day they dreamed about since they were young, and they're encouraged to do so. It's all…
/r/TheRedPill05/02/14 02:30 AM
3

No thank you. Anything feminism touches turns to a big brown pile of fecal matter. Keep them away from the education of boys as much as possible, not invite them to meddle more.
/r/MensRights05/02/14 02:02 AM
7

The marriage industry is a scam. A waste of tens of thousands of dollars for a one day party. For a lot of them, that's a huge part of the point.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/14 01:58 AM
6

"Guys, walk with your girls until these two cowards are caught. Both armed lowlifes together are too afraid to confront even one unarmed man. — iTHINKoutsideTHEbox" Given that annother guy got shot, I doubt it. And you've just got to love the user name, for the irony.
/r/TheRedPill05/02/14 01:12 AM
1

This is the only way I would ever "date" any more, were I interested in dating in the first place. Also, it's a great way to screen for similar interests. If a girl isn't into any of the things you're into, why hang out?
/r/TheRedPill05/02/14 01:02 AM
2

One of the practical things I have chosen to study is human interaction, and as such, I'm in the midst of 48 laws of power. Edison/Marconi vs Tesla is a specific example of several ways that differences in human attitudes and behaviour tend to lead to differing results. Edison was comparable to Bill Gates and Steve Jobs. They were better managers, manipulators, and marketers than they were with technical skills. They were able to use the talents of others to their own benefits, and spectacularly…
/r/TheRedPill05/02/14 12:43 AM
3

The finger-tapping evil raccoon is often enjoyable. The subreddit would be better if you could screen by meme. I'd immediately get rid of all of the bears, and puffins.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/14 07:12 AM
4

Risk-reward analysis is always a valid way of approaching the decision of whether or not to engage in a given market. I don't buy lotto tickets, or gamble at casinos, because the risk-reward analysis has it as a net loss long-term. Even if I think I've found a way to cheat and have no moral prohibition against cheating, the risk of ending up at the bottom of a river wearing cement shoes is not worth the potential payouts, given the relative probabilities. And humans are individuals with variatio…
/r/TheRedPill03/02/14 06:31 AM
6

Unfortunately, Tesla chose to thumb his nose at money and notoriety, and as a result, most of his inventions were credited to other men like Edison, and Marconi, resulting in it being quite difficult to get investors or sponsors for his further work.
/r/TheRedPill03/02/14 06:26 AM
1

Could also be Libertarian or Constitution Party, though they don't have as many candidates for Senate nation-wide.
/r/MensRights02/02/14 07:56 PM
1

Contrary to popular belief, even among some Church goers (many of them ideologically aligned with feminists) the bible does not shame all sexuality, or sexual desire. Have you read the Song of Solomon?
/r/MensRights02/02/14 07:50 PM
3

It's a 3:40 video, and he also chose to imply that grown men can't be sexually assaulted by only talking about women and "sons"/"a child", just in his opening paragraph. He repeats the 1 in 5. His administration pushed the "dear college" letter, and in this speech he is talking about creating a commission that is going to further enforce that paradigm. "Real men do not hurt women." "Being a man means" ... but no mention of what "being a real woman" means, or saying that real women don't hurt men…
/r/MensRights31/01/14 01:15 PM
5

Wow, you have a really low opinion of the brains and honesty of "most" don't you? 77 cent myth, White House Council on Women and Girls, supporter of VAWA, war on women rhetoric. This guy is actively whipping up hatred of men in support of women to get votes.
/r/MensRights31/01/14 12:39 PM
6

But it's not enough darn it! And the artificial respect gap is starting to fall apart. We have to shore it up! /s
/r/MensRights31/01/14 12:37 PM
1

this fantasy of equality Without defining what kind of equality you're talking about, your comment is meaningless. What's more, it is incorrect.
/r/MensRights30/01/14 01:22 AM
20

My point is that Obama made big public statements about Trayvon, because it was "white hispanic" on black violence, but ignored connected black on white violence, as well as black on black violence, and that the Justice department cleared up a conviction of voter-intimidation for the "New Black Panther Party" members. In his public speaches, he's "ignoring black people who commit crimes", while paying special attention to people that can be construed as white committing violence against blacks. …
/r/MensRights29/01/14 06:08 AM
8

Personally, I think that this is a statism vs liberty issue. There's loads of crappy politicians in both major parties, loads of insane ones in third parties, and occasionally you'll find a decent politican somewhere.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 05:52 AM
-1

When your own mother won't even support your run for president, it's a pretty sure sign you won't get the nomination. Thank God. Edit: For the record, I'm talking about Jeb Bush.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 05:49 AM
3

True, with all of the unecessary extra coverage, the price is going up for some women too.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 05:44 AM
33

"but feminism also fights for mens issues" Any more I just laauuugh and walk away.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 05:39 AM
25

Take a look at the mobs of black folks who assaulted white folks saying it was "justice for Trayvon". Not a peep out of O, despite his comment about his theoretical son looking like Trayvon. Take a look at what Holder did with the New Black Panther voter intimidation case, which had already reached conviction. What about all the hundreds of black folks who got killed by other black folks in inner cities? Do those victims not matter to him? Aparently not.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 05:35 AM
1

Slightly more than half the population in the US thus making men the minority, which would mean that by "minority protection" logic, men should be the protected class.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/14 05:05 AM
1

Arm and grip strength, mobility, general fitness, getting used to a different style of movement. There's better training out there, but if it's swapping in this, or nothing but running around in the desert, I'd definitely add the monkey bars to the training regime.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/14 05:01 AM
4

As a note, it's not just women that risk rape in war. Men are raped in war as well, just as they are in prison.
/r/TheRedPill29/01/14 04:46 AM
2

Yes, they do. That's an accepted point. And medical insurance companies stand to loose more on women than on men, so they charged women more. Which issue of "inequal cost" makes political hay?
/r/MensRights29/01/14 04:34 AM
3

If you decide to do this, you might consider having the results sent to an e-mail address only you can get into, or to a PO box paid in cash.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 02:03 AM
2

Car insurance. Medical insurance. Insurance companies. Different rules for what is "sexist", based on which kind of insurance. Either way, it's still insurance. This is the point, not an oversight.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 01:56 AM
1

Equality is not a concept that exists in a vacuum, but is a part of a comparison metric (way of measuring for the sake of comparison). If we're talking about the strictest measures of equality, then the person who finishes reading this sentence is not equal to the person who started reading it, as neurons have fired, you have moved forward in time, and your distance from the sun has changed due to the rotation of the earth. Two men can be equal in height measured in integer centimeters, but not …
/r/MensRights29/01/14 12:54 AM
5

That's how I came to MGTOW, that and having enough sense and core identity due to having been homeschooled for a while.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 12:29 AM
3

It seems like "half-stupid" might be an under-estimation.
/r/MensRights29/01/14 12:27 AM
4

It seems that you are advocating for a metric of equality that is measured, total, across multiple categories, and allows for inequality within some of those individual categories in order to allow for equality on the whole.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 01:30 AM
1

Which is in and of itself an absolute statement. Yoda also made a large number of absolute statements about the force. "Size matters not!" What, not even a little bit? Not at all? How absolutist! I guess all of Luke's trainers were Sith.
/r/MensRights28/01/14 01:07 AM
2

I've also seen the "war on women" meme used to demonize people for not wanting to pay for the medical services of others, or for opposing expansion of title XI. Basically, if anyone takes a stand against anything beloved by the feminist movement, this stance is framed as being a "war on women", no matter what stance it is that said politician is taking to oppose feminism. The definition is as nebulous as feminism itself, and as feminist defined "equality". As such, I see deflation of the "war on…
/r/MensRights28/01/14 01:01 AM
2

I'd be in that 95%. I see no value in being in the club in the first place.
/r/TheRedPill27/01/14 03:48 AM
3

The needs of the child and the needs of the mother are conflated because for pretty much the entirety of humanities existence they were stuck with the baby and the father was free to fuck off. Actually, in many cultures there was presumed paternal custody, which has now been reversed to presumed maternal custody, according to the "Tender Years Doctrine", and leveraged by women through the "Deluth Model of Domestic Violence". So the imbalance of the sexes in single parents is in and of itself a m…
/r/MensRights27/01/14 03:42 AM
1

So long as your stance on this matter is consistent, that if the woman becomes pregnant, both parents are responsible from that moment, and neither should have the option to abrogate that responsibility, I will not argue further on the subject... particularly since that's my own stance. I will note that most people who come to this board argue that the woman should be able to abort, and give her child up at a safe surrender site, but that the man should not have an option equivalent to either of…
/r/MensRights27/01/14 03:13 AM
2

The "war on women" is political vitriol miss-characterizing the situation at best. What it refers to also constantly changes depending on what the progressives, and their media allys think will make political hay. So having another group and their media allies change the meaning of the meme based on what will advantage them is only just more of the same.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 03:07 AM
0

Disclosure: I am pro-life. Take this into account when reading my post. Both sides of the debate generally agree that the child is metabolizing. Both sides stipulate that his DNA is human, and distinct from that of the mother. Both sides generally agree on heart beat, neurological function, the ability to feel pain, etc, all occur well before the 20 week mark currently in policy and political debate in the US. So the child's species is human, and by nearly any scientific definition, the child is…
/r/MensRights27/01/14 02:56 AM
2

re-frames said advice for women "So? Don't want to carry the child to term, and be responsible for caring for the child? Keep your legs shut." This standard should apply to both sexes, or neither.
/r/MensRights27/01/14 02:41 AM
6

This conflation right here, is one of the biggest points the MRM is fighting on. You segued from talking about the needs of the mother, to presuming that they are also the needs of the child, with no evedence that they are equivalent. People are conflating the needs and interests of the mother with the needs and interests of the child. They then use the supposed needs and interests of the child to abrogate the right to autonomy and free association of the father, but not that of the mother. The …
/r/MensRights27/01/14 02:32 AM
1

This guy is lucky it was just one guy who attacked him and not multiple guys bum rushing him. Such as in How can she slap!?!
/r/TheRedPill25/01/14 04:28 AM
4

And even if she can have those qualities while in a relationship with a man, whether she will or not at least somewhat depends on the man she's with. If he's strong, a leader, capable of keeping his frame, but also a truly good and generous provider and protector on top of that (such as a guy that takes care of his kids, does volunteer work in a leadership role, etc), she may be all of that, and also nurturing, supportive, etc. On the other hand if she's with a guy who doesn't know how to lead w…
/r/TheRedPill25/01/14 04:15 AM
1

In fact, from an account I read written by an ex-lesbian, the masculine/feminine personality dynamic is allowed to be much stronger in these relationships, than in heterosexual ones, because you don't get grabbed by the PC-police every other hour. These days, it's easier to find a butch lesbian, than a man who hasn't had the masculinity beaten out of him.
/r/TheRedPill24/01/14 03:13 AM
1

I usually only ever see ugly girls complain about guys not being nice enough. ... Plus romantic movies and television in the main stream media is usually written by men. I was discussing why an individual guy becomes bitter. As such, this isn't about the experiences of an individual woman who encounters him and what she tells multiple people, but the experiences of that individual man. The point is that he's told, not necessarily by the women he tries to date, but by those he seeks advice from, …
/r/TheRedPill24/01/14 02:20 AM
7

rape is an actual thing that really happens It's finally happened. I actually agree with a feminist on something. Of course, we probably disagree on all of the details, so I'm not sure this agreement is worth anything.
/r/MensRights22/01/14 03:50 AM
1

Racist.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 09:58 AM
1

The average standard of living for those considered "poor" has gone up quite substantially. Compare it to those living 100 years ago, and many of the "poor" of today are living better than all but the richest of that era. We have those living in true poverty with us still. People still freeze or starve to death in the US. We need to help these people, and contribute to the charities that serve them. But we have fewer per capita than before, and these people aren't getting the focus they should d…
/r/MensRights21/01/14 09:55 AM
2

Power companies, computer programming firms, engineering companies. Seriously, if what she say is true, that's a really huge knock against Brittain.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 08:59 AM
24

Don't rationalize the bad stuff that happens to you. Recognize injustice as injustice, and then decide what course to take from there. People rationalizing injustice as justice that just missed is part of why bad laws are so hard to get off the books.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 08:39 AM
4

It's part of an expanded scale based on a broader understanding of pack dynamics, that is more focused on social position than the binary Alpha/Beta model. In this model, the alpha is the head of some kind of social power structure, like the captain of the foot-ball team. Betas are his inner circle, the guys who are most valuable to the Alpha, and who he invests in in return. When the current alpha moves on (say, graduates), the next Alpha will likely be from this inner circle. In the Alpha/Beta…
/r/TheRedPill21/01/14 07:31 AM
6

I know a fellow like this. We're both engineers, and we've discussed social heirarchies and strategies. He's a classic alpha, who is a greater beta when just entering an environment. When a freshman in college, for example, his body language was that of someone who knew he wasn't dominant, but was trying to increase his dominance, and he recognized it. I, on the other hand, usually didn't give 2 fucks about social heierarchies, which was a quality he recognized in me before I did. We got along p…
/r/TheRedPill21/01/14 07:14 AM
12

I'm going to point out that this is what the vast majority of media tells guys to do. You want to have sex with a girl? Be super-duper nice, and she'll obviously appreciate you for the wonderful guy you are, and want to have sex with you!!! ... ... ... yeah right. The bitterness comes in because he keeps being told he's not nice enough, so eventually it becomes flanderized, and still doesn't work. He's following society’s instructions so as not to be a "jerk" or "bad person", and his failures wi…
/r/TheRedPill21/01/14 07:06 AM
1

Over workplace issue, and the recurring tactic of mandating that men fit the social roles mandated for them by women, yes. In particular, in the work place. This is one of the areas where content fits both places. Traditionally, there is some cross-over, particularly in the areas of MGTOW, and anti-feminists, both of which tend to frequent both MRA and Red Pill circles.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 06:47 AM
1

Nice. This increases my desire to donate funds for open-source work.
/r/MensRights21/01/14 06:40 AM
1

This all sounds like a great workout. My problem is I've gotten out of shape enough, I need a warm up before getting anywhere close to that level of work out. Something to ease me in, to get my body used to working out again, before I hit something that full on. I figure starting out with jog/walk, then working up to run/walk, and then sprint/walk on the intervals would be a way to get myself into the first part. For the second, I should be able to increase my reps on various body weight exercis…
/r/TheRedPill21/01/14 06:24 AM
1

Anything you'd recommend for weight loss and increasing my endurance again as a prep to getting back into martial arts, other than reducing my total caloric intake (which is already planned and in the works). Anything that can be done on a tight schedule with minimal equipment would be ideal. I do have some weights though, if that'd help.
/r/TheRedPill20/01/14 08:03 AM
1

But were the women doing the labor and innovation of technique, or was it the men in the matriarchy?
/r/TheRedPill20/01/14 08:01 AM
3

Also, monks in the East -> KUNG FU, bitches! Monks in the west tended to have skilled fighters as well, because many of them used to be knights or other warriors, who were seeing retreat from the world. Some western monestaries had to defend themselves from bandits, or other hostile powers, and did admiral jobs of it. Western arts martial (i.e. martial arts) were quite sophisticated, but got less recording than the eastern ones. What records we do have, however, show very advanced and developed …
/r/TheRedPill20/01/14 07:52 AM
34

I particularly suggest a breakdown of the CDC 12 month "forced to peentrate" numbers for men vs the CDC numbers for women who have been forcibly raped, or similar, and point out that men who haven't been raped can contribute just as much to a conversation on rape as women who haven't been raped. I will likely do so tomorrow.
/r/MensRights20/01/14 06:36 AM
3

I'm making a logical argument. Yes, against a statement that wasn't made in the first place, since you are divorcing a quoted text from the context that helps to define it's meaning. The OP in the linked to post, was making the claim that he was alienated from feminism because he was never allowed to voice or share an opinion without being shouted down. He then makes an edit to say that replies that fit the format of dismissing his opinion exacerbate the problem of his alienation. The quoted per…
/r/MensRights20/01/14 02:07 AM
1

But only because they mandate people take those classes to get unrelated degrees, and this kind of courtse-load inflation is why some students and employers are shifting toward associate and technical degrees. These departments are long-term going to loose them money.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 10:18 PM
3

Skip entirely, watch a sped-up version of the class video later, or get yelled at and then be unable to skip the BS portions of the class for the important stuff... hmmm. Generaly speaking, if a proff has an attendance requirement or grade, I assume the proff is horrible at teaching.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/14 10:03 PM
4

Kind of hard to do when you work with someone. He likely knew she was trying to get him, wasn't interested, and didn't confront due to not wanting to risk loosing his job.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/14 09:50 PM
3

Well, given his less than confident mannersisms, and his vocal fry, he fits multiple stereotypes of the homosexual even before rejeting her. That said, dude could just be metrosexual and not into her.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/14 09:49 PM
3

I think the better path would be to get the wymins studies department closed also.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 09:09 PM
2

If a woman tried this on me, even if I'd been considering her, that'd be the question I'd ask, and I'd openly reject her in part because of the dance mob. That, or I'd just tell her I wasn't interested, and walk off rather than let the shaming continue. And what is with them going on and on and on with how "brave" she is for approach a guy with an entire TV show as backup, because she's a woman? To me, it sounds like they're calling women over-all total cowards. And they keep talking about hones…
/r/TheRedPill19/01/14 08:57 PM
4

Tell them the truth as you see it from day 1. just try to keep the message age appropriate, and understandable. If I ever have kids, I am not telling them lies about santa-clause. They'll get just as many presents, they'll just know who they're coming from.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/14 08:36 PM
2

She runs out bawling and the next day her father's at his door ready to kill him because he broke her little heart. And this is why, if you think the guy at your door might be the dad of such a gal, you answer the door with a shotgun pointed at it.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/14 08:34 PM
2

That is not, however, a case that comes up in the real world. At best with this logic, you should be arguing that exceptions to his argument exist, or that it's too generalized, not that his generalized description is "nonsense".
/r/MensRights19/01/14 08:26 PM
2

Statists that alternatively call themselves liberals, progressives, or even "moderate conservatives", want the state to control everything about people's lives, including mandating compliance with secular ideologies. Libertarians generally want people to be free to choose their own path in life, and have freedom of association. For example, let's say progressives want gays to be able to "marry", with the full blessing of the state, conservatives don't want to be forced to treat these relationshi…
/r/MensRights19/01/14 08:23 PM
2

Over time, I've changed some of my views based on the evidence as I understand it, and logical arguments flowing from those facts. Most of the time, people who try to convince me of something (like the idea that feminism is good), try to rely on false "facts" like the 70 cents on the dolar myth, or faulty logic. When I try to get down to the base assumptions, and actually examine what underlies differences in ideology, people tend to get angry, bored, confused, or otherwise just want to stop. As…
/r/MensRights19/01/14 08:16 PM
1

A. The left/right paradigm is fatally flawed. B. What blogs people do and do not listen to varries by the area of reddit.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 08:08 PM
8

And even if you don't have sex, you can still be pulled through the ringer over an accusation.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 08:07 PM
6

If they don't want to have a courtroom, they shouldn't accuse a guy of a crime, and take away multiple years of his life (those spent already studying).
/r/MensRights19/01/14 08:05 PM
11

It should be addressed by a justic system. At best, we've got a legal system. At worst, we don't even have that.
/r/MensRights19/01/14 07:59 PM
8

I wouldn't even call myself alpha. My point is that giving discounts to a girl "because she's hot" is pathetic, both for the girl trying it, and the guy it works on. The girl that tried it wasn't even hot enough for me to notice her looks, which just makes it that much more pathetic.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/14 10:19 AM
7

So honestly not thinking she was all that cute suddenly makes me a try hard? Whatever.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/14 09:03 AM
7

Oh, I don't doubt it. I didn't work near any of the 'cool' places, or hot spots, so it was pretty rare I got a gal of the propper age to try the trick, but it never worked... possibly part of why it was so rare to get one that tried it.
/r/TheRedPill19/01/14 04:05 AM
59

Reminds me of the girls who would come up to the counter and ask for a discount, while using flirty body language. Me: "Oh, do you have a coupon, or a sales add?" Her, confused: "Nooo..." Me: "Oh. Then why...?" Her: "Um, because?" Me: "Sorry, not authorized to give discounts 'just because'." Her: Stomps off. Male Co-worker: "Dude, I totally would have given her a discount." Me: "Why?" Him: "She was hot!" Me: "And... what, you think giving her a discount will get her to sleep with you? As if. Bes…
/r/TheRedPill18/01/14 11:47 PM
2

It always was. Your noise filter just got stronger.
/r/TheRedPill16/01/14 11:37 PM
1

In the sense that a society does not get the product of the excess labor of all men, and thus cannot or grow to or survive at it's greatest hieghts, because it does not have the backs of men to place it's labor on, perhaps. But I do not see this as a catastrophe, so much as a natural part of the lifecycle of any given society. Creating a global and interconnected society just means the negative effects of the fall of that society will be more wide spread and harder to avoid by moving.
/r/MensRights16/01/14 06:50 AM
3

I mostly agree with this sentiment, with a major caviat. While everyone is an agent (some more than others), everyone is also the object of the actions of others. It's entirely reasonable to point out how someone else vicitmized you. This is the caviat. To expand on your point: It's not reasonable, at this point in history, to expect society to care as much about your issues as those of women, which it won't. Instead, it's better to step back, take a moment to recover, make a plan, then take act…
/r/TheRedPill15/01/14 07:33 AM
5

The US has a tradition of tarring and feathering judges, and running them out of town on a rail. Of course now the FBI and federal marshals work really hard to prevent that kind of thing.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/14 07:21 AM
4

The horrible truth is better to tell than a pretty lie.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/14 07:20 AM
5

It'd only work if it was only the mother involved. Otherwise, they'd let her off light, and punish the father harshly to "send a message". Even if he just knew she was going to do it, he'd get just as long a sentence as her (if noty longer) for "conspiracy", because obviously she did it because of him.
/r/TheRedPill15/01/14 07:19 AM
1

Like American media, Anime has shifted over time. I stopped watching most of the American media, in order to watch foreign material instead, but now more and more that stinks as well. One of the biggest problems is that it's okay to have shows focused on girls, and have the girls as positivly themed characters, but any show targeted to guys, with a mostly male cast absolutely must be mixed cast these days, and yes, so many of the anime feature a personality-lacking guy who is surrounded by womn …
/r/MensRights15/01/14 07:10 AM
1

Active political feminists and academic feminists are "like that". "Good" feminists are much like "good" members of the Nazi party who just wanted Volkswagons, and wanted more Nazism, before it became clear that this would actually lead to Jews dieing. Maybe there will never be a "cleansing" of men. I hope not. I pray not. But I'm not going to just be inactive because of prayer. I have seen evil, and as a watchman, I must speak, and act. Besides which, many of these "good" feminists believe in m…
/r/MensRights14/01/14 03:57 AM
3

I don't hate feminism because feminists hate MRAs. I hate feminism because feminism, as embodied in VAWA, and other laws pushed for by NOW, and other mainstream feminist organizations actively harm men, using the violence of the state. I hate feminism because patriarchy theory, as preached by SJWs teachers in mandatory classes in the public school system and universities belittles, demeans, and blames men for all of the woes of society. I hate feminism because feminism is itself intrinsically ha…
/r/MensRights14/01/14 02:40 AM
3

MLP just stands for "My Little Ponies". "Friendship is Magic" is the appelation for the new serries. It's like distinguishing between Star Trek: TOS and Star Trek: TNG. Both are Star Trek. Also, boxes are awesome. You can make them into castles, or rocket ships. And yes, observing parents, and hanging out with their group of friends are two of the ways children learn and grow. Even among adults, it's said that in a few years you'll grow to be more like the average of your 5 closest friends.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 03:20 AM
12

So by Anti-female you mean "not something most women will choose", not "prejudiced against women"? Alright then, that makes sense. Thanks for the clarification.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 01:59 AM
3

Spike is the baby dragon from both the origional MLP, and MLP: Friendship is Magic. He's one of the few male characters in either show. And kids usually don't have a lot of bariers built up, until others inculcate them. That includes enjoying cross-reality adventures. The kid from Toy Story reminds me of some of my own make-believe as a kid. Seriously, the ponies go on adventures. Most boys like adventures, and steeds. Also, sometimes the best show in the time slot is targeted for gals, but enjo…
/r/MensRights13/01/14 01:58 AM
5

Well obviously it's because the pony's go adventuring, and have fun, and my action hero figures need equine steeds that can talk and go on adventures with them, like how He-Man has Cringer/Battle-cat. Duh. Oh, and I'm gonna build a dragon mecha battle-robot for spike to ride in. No, seriously. I never got why My Little Pony figures came with combs and brushes, when instead I could ride He-man and Man at arms on their talking mounts through a lego village to go rescue the baby dragon that was tra…
/r/MensRights13/01/14 12:36 AM
5

I recall a similar experiment where they put kids in rooms with toys for the opposite sex, and the boys wound up using the girls dolls as soldiers and fighter-planes, and the girls wound up playing house with the soldier dolls.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 12:34 AM
2

If you treat everyone the same while believing that they are different, aren't you acting in a way disconnected with your understanding of reality? How can that be a positive thing? If you have two children (of any combination of sexes), and one is more phyically vulnerable than the other, and more sedate, and you have annother that is more emotionally vulnerable and rambunctious, then you should take those qualities into account when deciding how to best protect and nurture your children.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 12:33 AM
8

The term "tom boy" is not a compliment, especially after girls reach a certain age. That's interesting. I've heard girls and their mothers use that term as a mark of pride, as well as older gals use it to describe their youth with pride. It's usually used as a mark of pride to explain why they fail at traditionally feminine tasks I know how to perform, like cooking and sewing.
/r/MensRights13/01/14 12:27 AM
4

How is having particular hours that aren't flexible anti-female? I'm aware that women generally prefer jobs with shorter, or more flexible hours, but wouldn't that make women anti-bakery-jobs for their choices, rather than the other way around?
/r/MensRights13/01/14 12:19 AM
1

Mansplaining means "shut up, and let the women talk, dear."
/r/MensRights10/01/14 02:32 AM
-1

In my understanding most of the time, you're simply required to keep it shorn, or get it out to fully grown facial hair when you're on vacation. That's not to say there aren't exceptions, or social pressures to be shorn.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 02:22 AM
8

No thanks. I'll continue working against your vile ideology of hatred.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 02:18 AM
2

I disagree entirely. What a person says or does is a distinguishing characteristic they have chosen to take on. It is entirely reasonable to make choices based on your knowledge of those characteristic. I'm going to discriminate in favor of chocolate and against mango. Likewise, I'm going to discriminate in favor of people that add to my surroundings, over those who detract from it. I'm hiring someone to program Java? I'll discriminate in favor of someone who knows java, and against someone who …
/r/MensRights10/01/14 02:12 AM
9

The mortal blow to Chivalry was redefinining it in terms that completely excluded any code that included obligations from men to men, and the warrior heart of the code. "Chivalry" defined in terms of men doing things for women is a collection of items tacked on durring the romance movement. When the core of the code of behavior was removed, the collapse of the non-structural peripheral accessories was inevitable. If you aren't expected to come to physical defence of your feudal lords, take your …
/r/MensRights10/01/14 02:03 AM
1

Thank you. I'll be reading these over and checking them out when I have a bit more time, but even the first few are quite damning.
/r/MensRights10/01/14 01:56 AM
4

That's probably why OP posted the link, so people could contribute.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 08:33 AM
18

"A study of the symbolism of Misogyny in comic books, with special focus on the eye-beams of Cyclops as a metaphor for male gaze."
/r/MensRights09/01/14 08:18 AM
19

Does that mean Cyclops has two vision-based mutant powers with huge drawbacks instead of only one?
/r/MensRights09/01/14 05:45 AM
11

So he should accept the deal, record the reason for it, then argue unequal prosecution for the men.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 03:36 AM
9

As to the sentencing discrepancies, note that the two that got the harsher sentences, in addition to being male, also "admitted" to wrong-doing. The wife, meanwhile, "plead". Sentences tend to be different for those that keep their mouth shut and get a lawyer than those who talk to the cops.
/r/MensRights09/01/14 02:52 AM
0

I would not describe this woman as a lady, as often as she insists on doing so. How boarish would it be if I replaced "man" with "gentleman" every time I refered to myself? I probably would not be considered a gentleman by most readers.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 07:35 AM
5

Your preferences are yours, mine are mine. You posted that some women wouldn't use coed bathrooms due to their preferences, but did not make this allowance for men. I brought up that not all men would use said coed bathrooms either. Generally speaking, if it's a place that would have said bathrooms, I probably wouldn't be a patron in the first place.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 06:26 AM
1

I was adressing annother person's falacy that was predicated on the assumption of the existance of urinals, not positing that said urinals would actually be present.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 06:24 AM
6

This custom may still be observed by some, in some areas, but in my experience, this is as outdated as insisting that a man never offer to shake a woman's hand first, or that he always walk on the street side of the sidewalk. When I hang out with people because I want to hang out with them, we pick an activity we both like, and we both pay for our own arcade tokens or rounds of ammo, or bowling-shoe rentals, or what have you, and that this is how "hanging out" is done seems to the dominant socia…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/14 05:56 AM
20

If they were single-person bathrooms, why not just make both unisex? Way more efficient for use, for the exact reason you gave.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 05:42 AM
8

Who says they'd be standing in line behind you? Urinals are usually between the sinks and the stalls, or on an opposite wall from the sink, so if they exist in a multi-person co-ed bathroom, there will be a lack of privacy, as women walk past the urinals to get to the stalls.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 05:38 AM
11

Some men will use a co-ed bathroom, others won't. If it's not a single-user bathroom, I wouldn't save in an emergency. I'd walk down the street to someplace with a split facility, and I'd have a preference against the restaurant in the future due to the inconvenience.
/r/MensRights08/01/14 05:36 AM
1

As a note, depending on the field there may be different ways to be at, or near the top of your field. In various arts, you have those who have the highest gross or net sales figures. Then you have those who top the popularity charts (often one and the same), then you have those whose music stands the test of time, and are positively received and rewarded for the work of their youth even in their old age. Elvis and Sean Connery are both still well known and remembered figures, with memorable pie…
/r/TheRedPill08/01/14 04:54 AM
2

Then you should frame what you are saying as an opinion, rather than an argument, because that's all it is. Besides which, in many cases bruises form days after the initial blows. Also, visible bruises aren't necessary for potentially deadly brain damage. So even if there were no bruises, it's entirely possible for there to be abuse on the level that necesitates physical action, if the woman involved was creating blows to the head of a child. Also, hair can hide bruising very well, and most peop…
/r/MensRights08/01/14 03:41 AM
8

You seem to be arguing for a lack of bias on the part of the police based on... a belief in a lack of bias on the part of the police.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 01:41 AM
-1

If someone got fired for being straight it would be all over the news There have been news articles about it, just not in the mainstream press, which is a part of the SJW crowd. And, just like we don't hear nearly as much about when men get arrested and sent to jail for having sex with under-aged girls, but we hear about it when it happens to lesbians, we're not going to hear nearly as much when strait folk get fired. All we're going to hear from CNN or Fox is what advantages statist group A, or…
/r/MensRights07/01/14 01:01 AM
-1

Given that homosexuals make up about 2-4% of the US population, I'd guestimate that in the US it's probably about 3-7% of those who are fired for their orientation are heterosexual... which still puts them in the minority of those fired for that reason, but is still disproportionately large, given the number of people in power who are homosexual. Of course I'm making the range of numbers up, but I'm using the made up numbers to illustrate my point.
/r/MensRights07/01/14 12:42 AM
1

In this case, I'd say it depends on the race of the cop, so probably white. Now the other side of it. Consider: You've just been disciplined on the job, and want to get the decision reversed by a government organization. Would you rather be white or a member of a racial minority? You're a competent, accomplished proffesional, looking for a job. Would you rather be white, or a member of a racial minority? Personally, I'd like to get rid of all of those forms of discrimnation. But answering "the g…
/r/MensRights07/01/14 12:38 AM
2

That's interesting. The first time I saw "ladder theory" discussed it was explicitly theory laid down by the game community, and I have yet to hear it discussed save to deride it save inside that community. Naturally, as a result, I thought you were talking about a sub-theory within the game community, particularly since it sounded like a poorly described version of that theory.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 01:49 AM
3

I disagree with your description of this theory. In my understanding, it's generally held by the game community that people have preferences as to behavior, and some preferences are more common than others (and that some preferences are based on biology, and are near-universal, even if suppressed). Second, that by changing behaviors, you can change whether or not you are demed dating material. Third, in my understanding, the game community holds that while women tell themselves they want nice gu…
/r/MensRights06/01/14 01:25 AM
1

No. Common ground with nazis, feminists, and maoists is not good. I disagree with the foundational patriarchy theory, and with all laws and policies that I am aware of that have been put forth and backed as serious proposals by feminist organizations or academic philosophies. We do not need common ground with the enemy. We need to defeat it.
/r/MensRights06/01/14 12:02 AM
6

Generally speaking, there used to be a strong level of social pressure on people not to have sex outside of marriage and, if caught having sex outside of marriage, to get married. This was due to the enormous social costs of illegitimacy on a society. The production of bastard children was recognized as shameful, and could carry stiff penalties (depending on the circumstances) for both the man and the woman. In many cases the negative circumstances for childbirth outside of marriage were born pr…
/r/MensRights05/01/14 11:53 PM
6

To reinforce and clarify the point: Just because someone you know has a gun doesn't mean he's ever going to shoot annother human with it, even in self defense. He might be a hunter who responsibly hunts deer. We're all still at risk for being shot, because there are people out there with guns, and we don't know ahead of time what people will shoot what other people. And if there were no guns, we'd be at risk for being stabbed, because there are sharp things. And if there were no sharp things, we…
/r/MensRights05/01/14 11:45 PM
4

So, now that you've stopped making falacious statements about the statements I've made, do you want to actually ask questions to try to understand my position, rather than leaping off on tangents based on false assumptions?
/r/MensRights05/01/14 11:22 PM
5

x is a variable. That means that it can represent a multitude of different values. x can be 5, or it can be 12, or it can be blue, or it can be a banana daquiri. (Yes, I know how to do set math on fruit and booze). For example, take the polynomial function f(x) = x2 - x + 5. f(5) = 52 - 5 + 5 = 25 f(2) = 22 - 2 + 5 = 7 Seriously, if you don't even understand how variables work because you never got past algebra, you really shouldn't be criticizing a statistician on his mathematics or logic.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 11:10 PM
2

There are different values of "real". In this case, a cultural affectation is neither a physical nor biological reality. It's a manefestation of cultural forces which can be discussed and disected... which may well be the value of "real" you were talking about. Edit: To clarify. I wasn't claiming it wasn't "real". I was claiming that whether it's real or not, it's worthy of derision and mockery, then went about mocking it.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 10:42 PM
4

So you really think that the chances your girlfriend makes you cookies are equivalent to the chances she That is not my assertion. I was talking about whether or not the probability of x happening is logically non-zero ( p(x) != 0 ), given two other statements, and giving examples of the logic holding, some of which were positive, some of which were negative, to show the universality of the logic involved. I made no statement about how large or small the probability of x occuring is. I glanced o…
/r/MensRights05/01/14 10:40 PM
2

I'm sorry, but fashion is a real thing, and people can't just wear whatever they want without judgment. I'm sorry, but fashion is a cultural affectation that makes people ugly, and when people go on about it, I deride them about as firmly as other groups deride neck-beards. puts a salad bowl on my head, hand on hip, other in air in the "I'm a little tea pot" configuration "It's called fashon Demetri. Look it up. Now fetch me my edition of 'pre-teen miss'. I want to see if the flowers I wear to t…
/r/MensRights05/01/14 08:53 PM
1

Actaually, the original reason for heels on mens shoes is the same as for heels on cowboy boots. It was to keep mens feet from slipping forward through styrups, and thus make it easier to stand in the styrups while riding. It was a style choice of the gentry. This is also the origin of pointed shoes (which make it easier to get your foot into the syrup), rather than having shoes actually shaped like feet.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 08:51 PM
9

That's a part of the "sex that isn't just in the missionary position" he's so excited about, so he probably likes that idea.
/r/MensRights05/01/14 08:38 PM
16

Actually, I think that at this point, you would need sources to refute this statement. If some percentage of women who are in a relationship with men they are not married to do x to those men then unless you can tell ahead of time with 100% certainty which women will or will not do x, any man who is in a relationship with a woman he is not married to has a chance of x happening to him. This holds whether x is the woman baking cookies for and giving them to him, cuckolding him, divorcing him, giv…
/r/MensRights05/01/14 08:20 PM
1

Ah. I missed the connection. Thank you for the clarification. The example was unecessary.
/r/MensRights02/01/14 01:25 PM
1

Which would actually result in superior results, because even with men and women both in the draft, women would still wash out at greater rates unless we lower the physical requirements to the point women serve at the same rate... in which case we have a piss-poor fighting force.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 09:57 PM
0

What kind of BS are you talking about? I'm not countering what you are saying, just seeking clarity. Then maybe you shouldn't call it BS.
/r/MensRights01/01/14 09:51 PM
4

Don't you mean equal selective service responsibilities?
/r/MensRights01/01/14 09:47 PM
2

Or, most unfortunately, "he says, she assumes after the fact because she has no memory, he goes to jail anyway". x.x
/r/MensRights01/01/14 04:57 AM
1

I agree but consider actions taken while 'black out' drunk to be just as accountable to the person so long as they have the aforementioned physical capabilities you mentioned. I concur. This does, however, make proof of a lack of consent problematic when drink is involved.
/r/MensRights31/12/13 04:07 AM
3

I agree that this is the line under discussion. I have no knowledge of how incapacitated OP was, as that information seems to be missing. If he was unable to resist, say no, say yes, or otherwise indicate consent or lack there of, then I agree that absent prior consent this was rape. However, he could have had those capabilities at the time even if he could not transfer the memory of said activity from short-term to long-term memory (also commonly known as one form of "blacking out"). Either way…
/r/MensRights30/12/13 10:47 PM
14

If you drank yourself stupid and they had sex with you then by the very definition of rape you were raped, If by stupid he means unable to talk, make effective movements, or otherwise indicate consent or lack there of, then yes. If he means he made a choice while under the influence he later thought of as a stupid choice, then no.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 11:44 AM
-3

I clicked through, only to have adds, headers, and side bars take up the majority of my screen. I'm not going to bother trying to read around the poor page design.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 09:52 AM
2

Also true.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 09:05 AM
1

She may be talking about anal penetration of the raped by the raper. In which case, how can a woman not rape a man? Pegging is a thing. So is anal fingering. So are drugs, hand cuffs, and guns.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 08:52 AM
1

Any form of physical arrousal resulting in elevated blood pressure has the potential to create an errection, not just pleasant physical arousal.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 08:50 AM
3

I don't understand the American justice system anymore. Remove the word justice, and it becomes a lot more understandable.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 08:20 AM
1

I've heard of it before. I recall reading about a grandfather who was shopping for childrens books for his grandchildren being asked to leave the children's book area because his presense was making people nervous. I also recall reports of police being called on a father who was watching his children at a playground. There is a perception that if you're a man (adult male human) and around children, you must be up to something bad.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 08:17 AM
4

If she's over 18, this law doesn't apply to her, if she's under 18, according to most legal standards she's not a woman, she's a girl.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 08:07 AM
3

In my understanding, it's a word for any pest you want to shoot, trap, or poison, which includes many rodents, but can also include some snakes, and coyotes.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 07:50 AM
3

Part of the problem is that society glorifies and pushes divorce, and no man is ever the most successful person out there in every way. As such, while you can reduce your chances of getting frivorced by picking women that meet certain criteria, and being high-status, there is still the risk that your chosen partner will pull the trigger of the gun society is constantly pushing into her hands and urging her to use. If she pulls the trigger, you wind up havng the violence of the state used against…
/r/TheRedPill30/12/13 07:25 AM
1

That's one of the problems. Annother is that a rape investigation itself can be injurous to the innocent, perhaps even more so than a murder investigation. Ideally, every actual example of rape would be punished, and no false investigation of rape would even be investigated, but we live in a fallen world, not an ideal one.
/r/MensRights30/12/13 07:09 AM
2

Nor do men. No one ever accuses other people falsely. So obviously it would be unjust to not assume that an accusation of murder is true! /s
/r/MensRights30/12/13 07:00 AM
1

Possibly. I don't think a stay at home parent is sipping momosas on the beach. I do think that the person got a rare opportunity to take a decades long break from work, and took it. Someone else paid for the stay at home parent to be able to take that opportunity. That, right there, is the exchange. That is the arrangement. "If you stay at home with our kids kids, I'll work hard and pay for it with my job." The stay at home parent had an opportinity, and took it, rather than staying at work. I d…
/r/MensRights29/12/13 10:12 PM
1

Which was itself a derogatory name coined by newspapers, given to more radical follow-ons to the sufferagates.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 10:01 PM
2

Because it works.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 10:00 PM
1

I think it's both. The sad fact is, if we make the point on misogyny, more people listen than if we make the point on misandry.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 09:55 PM
1

Si. NOMAS? No mas.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 09:51 PM
2

In this situation he got the opportunity to, and chose to, take a paid vacation from his work for decades, which he chose to spend on his children. I wish I had the option to get a decades long paid vacation, where at the end of it, I have more assets than I do now, that I can then sell if I choose while I look for a way to support myself.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 09:33 PM
5

Used to be that women were held to an equal standard, and had to work to have a good relationship with their husbands and children, and divorce was supposed to be very very rare. Of course that was "unequal" and "oppressive". o.O;;
/r/MensRights29/12/13 09:32 PM
47

I can just imagine people freaking out about comparisons between women and breeding horses, when "stud" has long been a part of our lexicon. I'm rather amused.
/r/TheRedPill29/12/13 09:27 PM
6

Having a psychotic episode does not make it impossible for someone to be an agressor. Rather, it can be a root cause of being an aggressor.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 09:15 PM
2

Since you are telling people to get out because "equality", please give the metric you use. How do you measure it? NOW fights for "equality", and many feminists fight for "equality" by saying that the "wage gap" should be eliminated.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 09:11 PM
4

That doesn't negate the right of any person to defend himself and others.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 08:54 PM
3

Feminism is a socially transmitted mental disease. While her mental disease may be different one, they do seem to be similar in outward appearance.
/r/MensRights29/12/13 08:53 PM
1

... ... you do realize you've just largely made a portion of my point for me, don't you? If the trouble of providing a service and going through training, etc, to become a doctor means that most doctors are unwilling to take less than $x for service y, and the government won't pay $x through medicare, then most doctors don't treat people that have medicare. And if the doctors' costs go up by z (say, due to more paperwork, or more expensive equipment or insurance, or a new tax on medical devices)…
/r/MensRights28/12/13 03:55 AM
1

I asked for specifics. You say "the damned executive orders". Which? Which parts? How, specifically, does that give him more power than Hitler? Support your case. Argue. Don't just rant and rave. And if someone who aligns with the Tea Party and the Libertarian movements more than any others, and thinks the Paul Ryan budget was a bungle is a "Leftist American", I have no idea what kind of political left/right paradigm you're opperating under.
/r/MensRights28/12/13 03:47 AM
1

I understand the frustration of being a minority voice. I just don't think that tactic will help you make any headway in convincing people (it wouldn't and didn't help convince me).
/r/MensRights28/12/13 03:44 AM
2

Unfortunately this holiday season I have to spend similar efforts elsewhere. I won't specify, due to the doxing that attacks members of these forums. I hope some folks here can help spread some cheer, or at least sooth some pain.
/r/MensRights25/12/13 05:17 AM
1

Yes, there is more to it than that, and Josh as usual, did a great job of supporting his viewpoint. Thank you. I actually have quite a bit more to say on the matter, though a fair amount of those points depend on the axioms one adopts with regard to politics and government action. I held back since I crafted the post as a reply to a request for an explanation, and I did not intend to derail discussion of the original article with what was meant to be a snarky but fun one liner. As such, I'll dec…
/r/MensRights25/12/13 04:57 AM
1

If a individual or company does not cover its costs to opperate (including paying all of their workers and paying off debts), the individual or company cannot continue to opperate. The amount of of money it takes to go to a medical school is steadily incresing, and even before Obamacare, many doctors didn't manage to pay off their debts before they were 40. Some specialties were already seeing doctor shortages because the ability to make a living, after accounting for malpractice insurance and d…
/r/MensRights25/12/13 04:46 AM
1

Read the last few executive orders and weep then, obamaite. I don't like Obama at all. I also don't like people saying that bad person X is worse than an established extremely bad person Y without backing it up, especially when there are multiple peoples who were slaughtered wholesale as a part of the actions of Y. I'd likewise object if you said that one of the recent mass shooters was worse than Mao without backing it up. Oh, and shove your implied threats. What implied threat? There is a mark…
/r/MensRights25/12/13 04:42 AM
1

When the law specifically requires an insurance company to cover additional things, that company is absorbing larger risks. In order to stay solvent, it must cover those risks by raising premiums, or lower it's absorbed risk by instituting higher deductables and co-pays. It's just a basic fact of how insurance works. It works the same if the insurer is the government. It's just that the government raises premiums by raising taxes. The government also has the ability to mandate service and refuse…
/r/MensRights24/12/13 02:49 PM
2

The sad thing is, if I was unaware of the original video, I'd have thought they were totally insane, but serious... much like in the original video.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 02:34 PM
4

And shrink in size by at least a factor of 10.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 02:23 PM
1

Only case I'm personally aware of, and that was an issue of patner violence. Don't get me wrong, abuse is abuse... but if you're above the average male strength already, the number of women with more raw strength than you is going to be infentessimal. Agility? Maybe. Skill? Quite possibly. Raw power? Vanishingly small.
/r/MensRights24/12/13 02:07 PM
7

It seems like more people are catching on to how perverted and outdated the ideal of marriage is. The traditional ideal of marriage (look back at least before the romance movement) is not itself perverted. Nor, where society to actually support it, would it be a bad idea. Unfortunately, our culture is twisted and corrupt when it comes to relations between men and women. As such, it twists and corrupts institutions that were once good if those institutions deal with those relationships.
/r/TheRedPill24/12/13 07:42 AM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter