TheRedArchive

~ archived since 2018 ~

Justathrowawayoh Archive

View 2 posts and 536 comments by Justathrowawayoh on TheRedPill subreddit and various other subreddits related to The Red Pill community.
Search in:
In subreddits:
More
Filter by year/month:
Upvotes Comment on Subreddit Date (UTC)
1

ur a dishonest, lying idiot
/r/MensRights07/03/22 03:34 AM
1

Oh shit, this guy just discovered the word "some"! And it's incorrectly used here. No, feminism when it started was based on patriarchy theory, it's been about patriarchy theory for the century sense, and it's still about it now as shown by the beliefs of every institutional or academic feminist. None of it goes around preaching that your mother doesn't consider you a human being. a person engaged in a dehumanizing act doesn't mean they don't consider you human being ya goober If early feminists…
/r/MensRights07/03/22 03:34 AM
1

based on your description of others, I have little reason to think this is an accurate description either and even if it was, so what
/r/MensRights07/03/22 03:26 AM
1

See, and now you're insulting my parents. I'm accurately describing what your parents had done to you. You think feminism survives because women spread the message to each other that everyone who loves them is evil? feminism is based on patriarchy theory which necessitates women to think their grandfathers and fathers who love them oppress them for male benefit in a system of oppression so yeah, that's exactly what feminism does It's fine. I wouldn't want it to be any different. your opinion is …
/r/MensRights07/03/22 03:24 AM
1

no you didn't
/r/MensRights07/03/22 03:16 AM
1

Yes, they did. They may not have thought of it that way, but that's what they did. Imagine hacking at your son's genitals and thinking, "I want him to be like me" is a reasonable justification. Wtf. my penis is absolutely fine. you have no frame of reference
/r/MensRights07/03/22 03:13 AM
1

no they don't
/r/MensRights07/03/22 03:08 AM
1

it's not merely that a lot of you were mutilated, it's that it represents how we dehumanize men starting in infancy as they're strapped to a table and a knife is taken to their perfectly healthy body
/r/MensRights07/03/22 03:07 AM
3

Yes. I meant to support your post, which I think is great.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 11:32 PM
5

Incels are the most marginalize group in today's society yet another example of gynocentrism, that a male's value is determined by how women value them
/r/MensRights06/03/22 11:28 PM
4

Listen to your friend. Don't judge him. Don't think you need to correct some statement he made which you find offensive. Trying to smother or gaslight a person in this situation is going to make him seek out more radical groups. Shaming will do the same. Anger is a reasonable emotion to feel about many of the stories and discussions which go on here. Lots of bad things happen to males because they're males. People who come here sometimes get angry about it. They understand how it effects them, t…
/r/MensRights06/03/22 11:19 PM
1

yawn
/r/MensRights06/03/22 10:58 PM
2

it's clumsy wording which reveals true opinions english is not this person's 2nd language, he knows full well his post is insulting this sort of behavior is unacceptable and the best way to deal with it is to correct it immediately
/r/MensRights06/03/22 10:56 PM
4

you know your post was insulting and offensive which is why you included bits about not not trying to criticize the sub and people here while at the same time insinuating something insulting about them "hey yall, I'm not criticizing you, but why does my friend who hates women say he learned to hate women here?" come on bud, stop
/r/MensRights06/03/22 10:53 PM
1

it's sad because young people desperately need and want adult male attention but the pathologizing of men simply stops good men and doesn't stop the bad
/r/MensRights06/03/22 10:42 PM
11

no, you're a boy in highschool with no life experience\ Please do not assume that I am against you guys then don't write the post you wrote this isn't the place where your casual antimale bigotry and passive-aggressive insinuations about people here being incels, encouraging woman hatred, or whatever else will be treated kindly
/r/MensRights06/03/22 10:39 PM
11

pls im not trying to offensive to this subreddit "I'm not trying to be offensive by insinuating you're incels and attract incels" you can't be serious dude don't come to our space, call us woman haters who attract woman haters and turn people into hating women and expect some sort of kind or genuine response fuck off
/r/MensRights06/03/22 10:38 PM
1

intactivism (of baby boys) is an almost universal men's movement position
/r/MensRights06/03/22 09:35 PM
5

I've watched a ton of war footage and I haven't seen a single woman outside an obvious PR campaign. You see a whole lot of boys who look like they should be going to junior prom, but not a single woman. As with almost everything else coming out in English from Ukraine, it's almost certainly bullshit.
/r/MensRights06/03/22 07:25 PM
6

forewarning as someone who uses this; this will cause a new, lesser problem of women trying to make you their gay friend and set you up with dudes and the dreaded, "I'm such a sex kitten, I'll turn you straight!" girls constantly live in a state of wanting a life like a tv show
/r/MensRights01/03/22 01:14 PM
5

The person you rejected lied to your other coworkers about you and that's why they're treating you this way. All the women wouldn't behave this way to someone telling them they do not date coworkers. She made a story to make you look terrible to them and they believe the lie. There is a very good reason for the saying "hell hath no fury like a woman scorned." I would immediately report this to administration before someone else reports the lie.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 01:10 PM
29

They all hate you because they are acting in solidarity with the girl that didn’t get her way. No, the girl lied to them about what happened. I've been in and seen this situation many a time and when something like this happens, it's not merely that you said "no," it's that the woman you said "no" to got her feelings hurt and she told a lie to your other coworkers. No one behaves this way in tandem because you told a girl you don't date coworkers.
/r/MensRights01/03/22 01:07 PM
0

wherever you think has job opportunities for you to make a life and research what you need to do to get there
/r/MensRights01/03/22 12:44 AM
5

I don't think it's a good idea. I would bet the uniform would draw MORE attention and you would be asked where your unit is, why are you not there, etc. Without having experience in the military, I do not think you could convince military people. For me, I would avoid well-traveled roads and travel at night, trying to cross the border on foot in a rural area. If you know of any checkpoints, you could travel on foot around them through the woods or rural area and then meet your mom on the other s…
/r/MensRights28/02/22 11:37 PM
2

no, he's suggesting you put a uniform on pretending you're a soldier and walk away from the conflict hoping your uniform will stop anyone from stopping you and questioning you
/r/MensRights28/02/22 10:40 PM
6

yeah, leave before this happens
/r/MensRights28/02/22 10:37 PM
2

The Therapy Racket by Paul Elam is a great video about this issue.
/r/MensRights28/02/22 09:59 PM
1

btw kyiv post is a pro Western, English only "paper" not known for their objectivity on this topic and its financial backing and those of the people who write for it are Western
/r/MensRights24/02/22 10:45 PM
2

they were allowed in the Soviet Union, they just didn't Yet they were fine with kids and senior men to fight instead. yeah, the world is gynocentric and would rather force children to die than make women fight with the women being pretty content with that situation part of the problem so many here have with it
/r/MensRights24/02/22 09:31 PM
1

you don't have any idea what you're talking about
/r/MensRights24/02/22 09:23 PM
1

while tens of millions men fought and 11,000,000 died, there were 10,000 women "fighting" "literally dozens" is simply accurate
/r/MensRights24/02/22 09:22 PM
2

literally dozens
/r/MensRights24/02/22 09:17 PM
2

Ukrainian moves toward greater European integration is some sort of plot by western powers I mean, there are released documents which proved this was the case, look up victoria nuland there's every reason to believe it was (and remains) the legitimately-held majority desire in Ukraine. uh, no, this is bullshit western propaganda Making up quotes I didn't say is pretty desperate it's not making up a quote, it's communicating to you that you've made various comments which are nonsense and you only…
/r/MensRights24/02/22 07:28 PM
1

your claim is that my entire argument fails re: Putin having understanding reasons to invade Ukraine because you have some conspiracy theories about Yanukovych not being "legitimately elected"? whether he was or not doesn't really matter in the larger argument at all huge popular support for European integration in Ukraine at the time "I saw some stuffs on US media about this being like totally popular and what the people wanted despite just having an election which showed this to not be the pop…
/r/MensRights24/02/22 06:22 PM
4

Russia warns about NATO expansion, notes the explicit promise to not expand NATO passed the Elbe river in Germany NATO expands Putin warns about NATO expansion again NATO expands Putin warns Ukraine is a red line in the sand NATO expands Putin warns Ukraine is a red line in the sand US backs color revolution overthrowing legally elected pro-Russian president in Ukraine in 2014, the coup government immediately cozies up with NATO and the West and discusses joining NATO Eastern part of the country…
/r/MensRights24/02/22 05:07 PM
2

yes, tbf, my experience in England was in mostly London and the bar/club scene while I was there for a semester at LSE couldn't agree more, the best place to meet worthwhile people is just living your best life; they're there and you'll find them On the bright side, always take your shorter pals with you, they sound like great fake people detectors! true!
/r/MensRights24/02/22 03:02 PM
2

my experience with british girls is the opposite; I watched as they treated my short friends like shit I noticed no difference re height to any of the other western places I lived. And they love tall dudes.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 02:24 PM
1

how many psych meds you take? I bet at least an anti anxiety drug like zoloft
/r/MensRights24/02/22 02:00 PM
0

this is a great post exemplifying a typical shitlib redditor you: pay some shitlib to listen to you talk about your struggles me: talk to friends, family, church and community leaders, about my struggles you: "Gosh, the left is just so healthy by go to see therapists to get healthy, unlike 'rightwing people,' aka fox news" fundamentally incapable of empathy while hilariously claiming to be the most empathetic
/r/MensRights24/02/22 01:59 PM
1

this is nonsense, the "right" dislikes therapy because it's chalk full of shitlibs pushing drugs on people do you ever actually talk to people who are rightwing or just circlejerk with other shitlibs who post some rando you're supposed to ridicule together?
/r/MensRights24/02/22 01:51 PM
1

lmao peak redditor comment
/r/MensRights24/02/22 01:48 PM
1

you're a caricature a hateful bigot yet another example of a deranged shitlib who is the exact thing she accuses anyone else of
/r/MensRights24/02/22 01:25 PM
6

it's hard to think of ruling elites who have thrown their populations under the bus for their own benefit more than the West in recent memory
/r/MensRights24/02/22 12:51 PM
0

a government which has the power to stop a private sector which "rape pillage and plunder" will have more than the power to do just that and they do and will and have for all of history so yeah, a society which does the former will do that latter your posts are just communist bullshit and I truly hope you get exactly what you want and hope all the innocents aren't dragged along with you
/r/MensRights24/02/22 12:41 PM
13

The US and NATO has long given up anything resembling a moral high-ground a long time ago. It's fuckin rich seeing these same scumbags whining about the international legal order after what they have done to the international legal order post-WW2. And as always, men will be the primary bearers of the cost of the great game.
/r/MensRights24/02/22 12:38 PM
5

attempting to erase the extreme gendered differences in the military and military conflicts is antimale bigotry "MRA"s like you is the last thing men need
/r/MensRights24/02/22 12:30 PM
22

it should go out to all the men who will die today so the ruling elite can continue to get rich and play their "great game" hopefully, Ukraine will simply lay down their arms; they were lured into this absurd situation by scumbags in morally bankrupt Western foreign policy establishment, primarily the US and the UK
/r/MensRights24/02/22 12:27 PM
3

all soldiers aren't equally valuable nor do they pay equal costs nor do they risk equally that difference in risk and outcomes is extremely gendered and trying to smear it all together to puke feminist garbage is disrespectful to all the men on the losing end of that gendered difference as I said, I'm sure you feel lots of derpy anti-male nonsense
/r/MensRights24/02/22 12:24 PM
7

convenient I think we'd all be better off fighting against conscription for men hasn't worked for 50 years, I guess we'll just double down now repeatedly bludgeoning people to live by their alleged principles has been the best way to push for men's rights
/r/MensRights24/02/22 12:21 PM
4

what's sexist is disrespecting the mountains of men who've died for some bullshit empty words about "sexism" I'm sure you feel lots of derpy anti-male nonsense
/r/MensRights24/02/22 12:17 PM
4

"soldiers" While we are staring down an actual war there will be no war, the US is a weak joke with a population that hates the ruling regime this is extremely disrespectful to those soldiers. no, what's extremely disrespectful is comparing the 95% men who will be doing the fighting and equating them to the secretary staying on base
/r/MensRights24/02/22 12:12 PM
3

easy way to increase birthrates
/r/MensRights24/02/22 12:09 PM
18

"white knights" is the whole saying "knights" is not the same
/r/MensRights24/02/22 12:07 PM
16

you're contemptible and why no one should ever allow anyone not currently practicing their professed principles to their own detriment to bludgeon them about anything
/r/MensRights24/02/22 11:51 AM
4

lol can you imagine risking death for the ruling regime in the US?
/r/MensRights24/02/22 11:51 AM
39

what? people who do this are deserving of hatred: preaching "principles" that benefits them until it doesn't and then switching on a dime no, fuck those people
/r/MensRights24/02/22 11:42 AM
0

trade for the government boot, what an improvement
/r/MensRights24/02/22 08:20 AM
0

you have never seen any "reliable research" which supports the claim that at least 35% of women have been raped in their lifetimes in Europe this is absolute nonsense fuck off bigot
/r/MensRights24/02/22 08:19 AM
51

women treat different men radically differently
/r/MensRights23/02/22 10:01 PM
4

oof this is going to sound mean, but you get treated like this because you allow and encourage this through your behavior and how you select women toronto women are just not worth the effort
/r/MensRights23/02/22 09:55 PM
7

if you try out as the provider, what position you think you're getting? stop simping
/r/MensRights23/02/22 09:48 PM
0

oh, you have a cartoonish understanding of "fascism" and think it just means "authoritarian" So who's the fascist leader? the state Where's the military force that kills any who disagree? they're called cops; you resist and they will kill you, there are currently hundreds of political prisoners being tortured in DC jails right now awaiting show trials
/r/MensRights23/02/22 08:12 PM
0

western capitalism is absolutely fascism, simplistically: a merger of authoritarian state power and private capital the reality of the authoritarian controls over every aspect of life over the last 2 years across western "Democracies" should have made that obvious
/r/MensRights23/02/22 08:06 PM
2

socialism is far worse than the fascist clusterfuck that is western "capitalism" western governments read Marx's critique of "capitalism," a word he created to caricature the free market and were like, "ya know, this is a good idea!"
/r/MensRights23/02/22 08:03 PM
2

it's far worse
/r/MensRights23/02/22 07:57 PM
2

they're fundamentally unserious people and fit the bill for the sort of vulnerable mental illness cases the state loves to use as weapons against their opposition I have a long history in this area and these people are cancer with agendas which have nothing to do with improving real worker's lives in real ways, their advocacy is a performative cope
/r/MensRights23/02/22 07:50 PM
8

you nailed it the anti-work movement is the neon mental illness case who thinks "worker rights" means forcing their coworkers to use preferred pronouns in general, these sorts of people look down upon and are disgusted by the actual working class
/r/MensRights23/02/22 07:41 PM
0

capitalist serfs want daddy government slave masters
/r/MensRights23/02/22 07:40 PM
0

you're the interloper who wants to use it for your "treat workers better" movement anti-work has a long history and it sure as shit was not a "treat workers better" movement
/r/MensRights23/02/22 07:37 PM
2

we certainly are sexist, just in the opposite way they think but in the marketplace of ideas, women's tears win
/r/MensRights23/02/22 07:34 PM
1

so you base this opinion on?
/r/MensRights23/02/22 07:33 PM
1

yeah? you work in the US?
/r/MensRights23/02/22 06:53 PM
1

the funny thing about that whole drama is the reason it doesn't happen in other reddits, including this one at least in earlier years of its existence, is because of strict censorship about moderation complaints and banning complaints and complainers about it the dude you saw on foxnews and then the fallout where it was exposed they're all like that is who founded the antiwork movement and who make up its activists
/r/MensRights23/02/22 06:34 PM
0

no, that's not what the anti-work movement is nor is it why or how it was founded it's not merely about improving working conditions your post is like the semi-ignorant "feminists" who argue feminism is just equality, ignoring what feminism began as, what it's leaders think of it as, and how it really acts
/r/MensRights23/02/22 06:32 PM
1

then why has good working conditions followed every single society which is rich? theoretically, it may not be necessary but in reality it always follows it unionism, on the other hand, is neither sufficient nor necessary for working conditions nor does it precede them
/r/MensRights23/02/22 06:26 PM
1

there is one thing which is common among rich countries and it sure as shit isn't strong unionism unions are not the cause of good working conditions, being rich is the cause of good working conditions no amount of unionism will enable good working conditions when you're starving to death
/r/MensRights23/02/22 05:42 PM
-2

the anti-work movement is mostly mentally ill communist degenerates who don't want engage in productive labor and instead want other people to work to support them they want to accomplish this by stealing other people's stuff and labor at first through an authoritarian state and allegedly, eventually, robotic scarcityless utopia (any day now, just 15 more days before the vast authoritarian state will disappear) inevitably, their "solutions" are authoritarian states forcing capital owners to do t…
/r/MensRights23/02/22 03:48 PM
3

working conditions are good because you're rich, not because you have strong unions
/r/MensRights23/02/22 03:46 PM
7

35% of women are not raped in their lives in Europe Don't puke propaganda. It makes you hateful. you swallowed the propaganda which is why you're a hateful bigot
/r/MensRights23/02/22 01:35 PM
1

if you get any anti-male vibe from the therapist at all, end it immediately and find someone else imo "therapy" is a catchall copout to not give any real advice and the profession is notorious for anti-male bigots
/r/MensRights23/02/22 11:17 AM
1

Setting boundaries is an essential part of healthy relationships. If you acquiesce here to avoid divorce, where and how many other times are you going to acquiesce what you want? I just don't know what to do, how to feel or anything.... help please I think you do know what to do, you're just afraid of the consequences of standing up for what you really want. You both tried many times, it's not happening. What you want matters.
/r/MensRights23/02/22 11:14 AM
1

"Yeah, you're worried about being able to support them and don't want another kid, but the solution is to sacrifice yourself even harder!" tradcon garbage
/r/MensRights23/02/22 11:09 AM
6

Yes, I reread your post and think you were just pointing it out. I apologize and agree. Happy birthday!
/r/MensRights23/02/22 10:49 AM
37

disposability is what being male means to you you didn't choose it, it was thrust upon you and you accepted it and now identify it as your most valued trait, in fact it's what makes you male at all it truly is sad what is done to men and boys thank men who sacrifice, but don't levy your burden onto other men or attempt to morally bludgeon them or shame them or whatever else into being disposable for the benefit of others
/r/MensRights22/02/22 08:55 PM
3

Men do say all those things. You don't get this excuse Ann Widdecombe. This isn't about a lack of talking. The truth is far darker than Widdecombe's copout: society does not give a fuck about male suffering until it significantly affects them. As long as enough men are being fed into the woodchipper of dumb ass wars, mines, and factories, the ruling elite are perfectly happy. When they start to run out of draft horses is when they care. Now is the time when that's happening. Men are simply dropp…
/r/MensRights22/02/22 03:46 PM
3

“men’s greatest weakness is their facade of strength. Women's greatest strength is their facade of weakness" I never heard that 1st saying but it's a good one. It's a quote from Will Farrell's The Myth of Male Power.
/r/MensRights22/02/22 03:39 PM
1

both its misuse and overuse
/r/MensRights22/02/22 12:16 PM
0

peak redditor hottakes
/r/MensRights22/02/22 11:25 AM
4

imagine sacrificing your life for people who hate you tradcon bullshit Josh Hawley didn't even have the fortitude to force a discussion on election certification and he wants to dupe you into risking your life for a society which hates you and replaces you with outsiders.
/r/MensRights22/02/22 11:19 AM
0

Yeah. Feminism is braindead, but feminism (or more accurately, weak men trying to simp to feminism's demands) treated men so poorly it's freed men. You're better able to live your individual life by your individual terms now more than ever. Independence and self-sufficiency is real freedom.
/r/MensRights22/02/22 11:10 AM
0

when Putin gets the war he's so desperately trying to provoke off the ground though lol similarly to how things were improved for the commoner post WWI. LOL
/r/MensRights22/02/22 11:08 AM
0

"socrates was an idiot and socratic reasoning is whataboutism" it's not the word, it's you
/r/MensRights22/02/22 10:55 AM
0

the internet got in every way worse when your average to midwit person learned the sophomoric version of "whataboutism"
/r/MensRights22/02/22 10:11 AM
11

they do it because sports simps put up with it and continue to give them money and eyeballs Nascar has a multiyear campaign telling their fans they hate them and their fans continue to give them money. It's wild, but simps are gonna simp and it harms everyone.
/r/MensRights20/02/22 08:34 PM
2

stop simping
/r/MensRights20/02/22 08:03 PM
1

lol
/r/MensRights22/08/21 11:56 AM
1

Frankly, yes, I do think it's more likely Syrian rebels or some other nonRegime group did this. And like you said, Assad has already committed countless war crimes against the Syrian people. Why would Assad, who has shown to be wholly capable of mass slaughter and war crimes in the past, do the exact thing Western powers told him was the one red line which would cause them to enter the war? He has done similar things with conventional weapons and was winning the war with conventional weapons. Th…
/r/MensRights22/08/21 06:30 AM
3

oh, is that all you wrote? okay
/r/MensRights21/08/21 04:50 PM
8

you're an excellent reason why no one should allow teachers to do this to boys in schools what your behavior will be like in the real world is simply antimale bigotry
/r/MensRights21/08/21 04:16 PM
12

incels should be defended; they don't deserve ridicule and bullying, the deserve empathy and compassion this group of people is likely the most powerless group of people in society you're a bully against the powerless and you think this makes you virtuous it's absolutely shameful
/r/MensRights21/08/21 04:14 PM
6

do not hand your kids over to be taken care of and indoctrinated by people who hate you
/r/MensRights21/08/21 04:12 PM
17

I don't know what happened, but I find it really hard to believe Assad, who was winning the war, just magically decided to do the one thing which the US and western powers said would be the red line. Assad clearly doesn't give a fuck about killing civilians. He'd done it throughout the entire war. He never needed to use chemical weapons to cause mass casualties. Why, when he was winning, would he do this? It doesn't make sense. The OPCW shredded their credibility and shouldn't be trusted. They h…
/r/MensRights21/08/21 04:09 PM
1

it's not, but I guess that's the goalpost you're going to shift to since reading comprehension is an ongoing issue for oyu
/r/MensRights19/08/21 07:43 AM
1

No, the post is about the coverage evidencing anti male bigotry. The subject of the coverage is Taliban action. What the taliban are doing has abosolutely nothing to do with mens rights. Its more about human rights. both men and women. except men and women are treated differently with men being treated far worse while coverage stresses the harm to women that has to do with "men's rights"
/r/MensRights18/08/21 10:25 AM
1

so fly your ass over there and do something about it you chickenshit lil coward
/r/MensRights18/08/21 03:57 AM
2

sure thing, bigot
/r/MensRights18/08/21 03:24 AM
3

"liberal feminism" is the motte to the feminism bailey
/r/MensRights18/08/21 03:18 AM
0

okay, so you're not suiting up and shipping out? bud, you just care so much and other men are evil and monsters for not continuing to send other men, not you of course, to die over there for it gosh, I'm shocked some derpy warhawk on the interwebs is some chickenshit little coward
/r/MensRights17/08/21 05:38 PM
8

I'm sure women who got abducted to be sold as sex slaves would rather have died. almost no women actually kill themselves when they're "sex slaves" and they can always choose deaths the men and boys being killed don't have that option This sub is a joke and so are your moral values. looking at the state of your country, please, do tell me about your "muh moral values" why aren't you back in your country defending women bud? you don't think it's a bit hypocritical to attack men for doing exactly …
/r/MensRights17/08/21 05:31 PM
6

Why? Feminism was always toxic and was always manhating.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 05:16 PM
1

Are you in Afghanistan now fighting the Taliban? The taliban are just crappy people with crappy ideals. Nobody should be forced to marry. Nobody should be left to die. Taliban are shitty people. They are cockroaches. take your own advice
/r/MensRights17/08/21 05:11 PM
0

right right other people should do it you chickenshit little coward fuck off
/r/MensRights17/08/21 04:11 PM
1

this isn't about the US, it's about "muh two evil and cruel monsters" who "stopped fighting" you ever start fighting chickenhawk? suit up bud, you could be on the ground and defending the downtrodden in 36 hours
/r/MensRights17/08/21 03:04 PM
1

Hey chickenhawk, don't you worry. Suit up, get some equipment, and ship out to save them you chickenshit little coward.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 06:04 AM
4

You don't really have a clue who the puppet government and warlords the US has been making filthy rich for the last 20 years are, huh? They have a practice where they sex trade enslaved little boys and fuck them and then kill them. You likely didn't hear about this because no one gives a fuck about little boys or men generally.
/r/MensRights17/08/21 06:03 AM
8

Being raped and kept as essentially as a slave/sexual prisoner can be considered worse than death. a person in this circumstance always has the choice of death and can decide for themselves if this is worse than death the men and boys who are being slaughtered weren't given that choice fuck off with your antimale filth
/r/MensRights17/08/21 06:01 AM
5

lol he did it in front of multiple witnesses why would she abondon his husband if he did not found guilty by court she didn't because he was her key to power and she's a sociopath
/r/MensRights17/08/21 06:00 AM
7

Women in the past were oppressed. no they weren't as long as we're comparing "oppressive" with respect to men
/r/MensRights09/08/21 05:46 PM
1

lol fuck off bigot
/r/MensRights09/08/21 03:54 PM
1

did you watch the video? MGTOW is that the entire subreddit became hateful this is simply dishonest at best History often tries to rewrite itself, it just doesn't make sense to stand by those who have radicalized a good idea. almostselfawarewolves
/r/MensRights09/08/21 03:23 PM
1

All it's about is standing for women's rights, not in the slightest attacking men. Not All Feminists! except what feminism does in the real world is just attacking men with the theory, the leaders, and the history all being anti-male bigotry and male-hatred
/r/MensRights09/08/21 01:37 AM
1

you choose to be this person
/r/MensRights07/08/21 12:48 AM
1

lol
/r/MensRights07/08/21 12:36 AM
1

pigs
/r/MensRights06/08/21 07:34 PM
4

No worries! It needs to be said even if people who aren't ready to admit it about themselves shoots the messenger in the process.
/r/MensRights06/08/21 03:17 PM
2

lol fuck off antimale bigot
/r/MensRights06/08/21 03:14 PM
5

is reading comprehension an ongoing problem for you?
/r/MensRights06/08/21 03:13 PM
2

sure thing bud I'll return your downvotes
/r/MensRights06/08/21 04:45 AM
-3

it wasn't any of the cartoons, the books, the movies, etc., which all blare that message at kids (and boys) it was you who chose to do it and it just magically happened to be exactly what little boys are conditioned to think from birth like I said... uh huh, sure ya did bud
/r/MensRights06/08/21 04:40 AM
-10

uh huh
/r/MensRights06/08/21 04:33 AM
12

because you've been conditioned to believe this is the "right" thing to do we condition BOYS so much that little children who don't understand death or the decision they're making thrust themselves into the breach it's disgusting
/r/MensRights06/08/21 04:25 AM
60

"women live longer, women most affected" you honestly cannot make this shit up anymore
/r/MensRights06/08/21 03:34 AM
2

the difference is you like one and dislike the other despite them being the same thing just in different form
/r/MensRights06/08/21 01:42 AM
38

teaching little boys to sacrifice themselves is disgusting
/r/MensRights06/08/21 12:06 AM
4

you see femininity stripped of its pleasant ornaments and soft edges
/r/MensRights06/08/21 12:01 AM
8

feminism is weaponized femininity it is not separate from "women" it works because men have an outgroup preference and women have an ingroup preference
/r/MensRights05/08/21 11:53 PM
23

if you only play defense, you lose
/r/MensRights05/08/21 08:50 PM
-6

I'm wayyy past the point of ever giving a fuck when bad things happen to pigs.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 05:57 PM
1

agreed and the US should stop propping it up and supporting it with American blood and money
/r/MensRights05/08/21 03:00 PM
1

tradcons are not your friends men's right activists and they sure as shit are not going to be your salvation and anyone who has tried to push men's issues is made aware of that rickytick imagine simping for Ben Shitpiro
/r/MensRights05/08/21 02:59 PM
3

I don't know enough about the AFD or German? politics to really comment on them.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 02:44 AM
6

shitpiro is a traditional conservatarian who is the other side of the gynocentrism coin feminism on one side and traditionalism/"conservatism" on the other; both would have you sacrifice yourself for women and women's needs you're tricked into thinking tradcons are on your side because they don't openly hate you and you get drawn into their bullshit because they pat you on the back as the shove you into the trenches, load you into a plane to be shipped over seas, or be sucked dry at some soulles…
/r/MensRights05/08/21 02:41 AM
16

Oh, no, they're fighting men. Ya see, women don't see most men as people and they don't care about them. What they see is the top 10-20% of men who do, indeed, put an emphasis on higher sexual value and attractive women. When they're complaining about "men," what they're complaining about and to is Ryan Goslings, not you.
/r/MensRights05/08/21 01:52 AM
12

while shoveling those voteless men onto the battlefield and into the mines
/r/MensRights05/08/21 01:48 AM
13

the best at what? being a duplicitous shitweasel? shitpiro is controlled oppo who is used to gatekeep the rightwing in a way which neuters it and makes it lose while complaining and whining and never actually able to exercise political power in a way which benefits their causes but I'm sure he'd be onboard sacrificing millions of American men for Israel's bullshit
/r/MensRights05/08/21 01:44 AM
37

Like even when I assume you’d say society was great and at its best for men an incorrect assumption and no, alimony, child support, divorce, etc., is nowhere near as old as you think It’s not like those things were created in the 80s and 90s lol do you think "feminists"/women were only pandered to in the 80s and 90s? affirmative action and other special privileges to women are a pretty clear "tangible" successes I love feminism. I think it's braindead dumb, but the movement has freed men from th…
/r/MensRights04/08/21 11:34 PM
64

men do not have an ingroup preference Feminists get pandered to a lot more in the media and say in academic institutions in the west compared to anywhere else by miles, but it hasn’t translated to any kind of tangible success or dominance over men, as of yet at least. lol you look at marriage, alimony, child support, etc., and think "ya know there is no tangible success or dominance over men"
/r/MensRights04/08/21 11:16 PM
1

Fair enough.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 11:13 PM
1

no one should want cancerous concern trolling derps like you in "us"
/r/MensRights04/08/21 09:18 PM
1

gorsh, I bet you're just such a genuine guy coming here from subredditdrama in response to a mgtow ban post, spouting antimale bigotry
/r/MensRights04/08/21 09:18 PM
0

you're not "us", concern trolling subredditdrama derp
/r/MensRights04/08/21 08:09 PM
1

No fuck off antimale subredditdrama troll
/r/MensRights04/08/21 07:58 PM
1

Step up bud.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 03:37 PM
3

"patriarchy theory" is indeed a fever dream of antimale bigots hierarchies are indeed real and based on merit which is why they end up being mostly filled with men
/r/MensRights04/08/21 03:34 PM
2

anger is an entirely valid response to the way many men are treated in today's society fuck off with your male-hating bullshit subreddit drama clown garbage
/r/MensRights04/08/21 03:30 PM
1

RP rage refers to "red pill" rage. It's the rage many men validly feel when they realize society for what it really is, how men are treated, etc., and they feel betrayed and angry about how they've been conditioned with lies to get them to behave in a way which harms them to the benefit of others. This experience is called "red pilling." MGTOW spaces are a place for men going through this to vent, be mentored by other men who have gone through that similar (and entirely valid) phase, and for the…
/r/MensRights04/08/21 03:28 PM
1

It doesn't necessarily have to be about being screwed over by a woman. Many MGTOW were not screwed over by women, but they saw the society for what it is, how men are treated, etc., and they feel betrayed and angry about how they've been conditioned with lies to get them to behave in a way which harms them to the benefit of others.
/r/MensRights04/08/21 03:26 PM
3

there are different types of genital mutilation for males and females and the most commonly practiced form of female genital mutilation does not result in the removal of the clitoris
/r/MensRights03/08/21 04:17 PM
8

Eliminate women's sports next. It's discriminatory and bigoted.
/r/MensRights03/08/21 04:10 PM
1

i dont think uncircumcised would be Better in any way. how would you know? hat u circumcise to numb the penis and make you have less of a sex drive male genital cutting is done purposefully to harm male genitalia And then there is the religious one (jewish/islamic) where the aim is to make the penis easier to stay clean. this is not the reason that Jews are cut; Jews are cut to form a blood covenant and mark the Jew to be different from others the cleanliness nonsense wasn't created until thousa…
/r/MensRights29/04/21 12:23 AM
4

Sincere apologies are powerful things.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 12:13 AM
1

https://tubitv.com/movies/567364/american-circumcision
/r/MensRights29/04/21 12:11 AM
3

Make sure you make this a firmly stated belief and on multiple places on hospital documents; it is not uncommon for it to be done "accidentally" in many places for a number of reasons (it's the default some places and doctors make money doing it). Mom wakes up from a pain meds and dad isn't there the whole time and they both find out the baby has already been mutilated.
/r/MensRights29/04/21 12:08 AM
1

which is an admission by you that mens rights is simply not a priority for you
/r/MensRights29/05/20 11:49 AM
1

imagine expecting someone to scan throughout the comments to see if you've commented more before responding
/r/MensRights29/05/20 10:29 AM
1

imagine expecting someone to scan throughout the comments looking for more of yours
/r/MensRights29/05/20 10:17 AM
1

It's hard to think of a politician in the last 30 or so years who has done more to fuck over men than Joe Biden, but the "totally MRAs" who "totally care about men's rights" really show their true colors and what they actually care about.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 06:33 AM
1

Oh, makes sense why you like Joe Biden then.
/r/MensRights29/05/20 06:31 AM
1

imagine hating Trump so much you're fine voting for a dude who did his best to fuck men over
/r/MensRights29/05/20 06:30 AM
1

lot more people than the "Fox News crowd" and "the neocons" would be in prison for supporting the Iraq war it was bipartisan with scumbags at the New York Times drumming up support for it as well
/r/MensRights01/05/20 05:15 AM
6

you know he admits that was dumb and has changed his mind, right? and that he's one of the loudest mainstream voices against war on the right, e.g., against the Iran crap, against the Syrian crap, and an end to the Afghan War? Agreed though. Tons of people deserve special places in hell for supporting the Iraq War. I'm sure you apply that criticism equally, kiddo.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 08:52 PM
1

Where did you hear the claim about the US Constitution "technically" only giving rights to men?
/r/MensRights30/04/20 08:41 PM
1

where did you hear that?
/r/MensRights30/04/20 08:39 PM
1

so "technically and literally" the American Constitution doesn't differentiate, huh?
/r/MensRights30/04/20 08:35 PM
0

I, too, have never actually watched Tucker Carlson or really have a clue what he thinks or believes, but some derpy lefty journalists says he's a bad boy.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 08:34 PM
1

I, too, have never actually watched Tucker Carlson or really have a clue what he thinks or believes, but some derpy lefty journalists says he's fascist so he's fascist.
/r/MensRights30/04/20 08:34 PM
1

How many times in the US Constitution does "men" appear? And no, not technically or literally, does the American Constitution "only give rights to men."
/r/MensRights30/04/20 08:31 PM
1

feminism has the same purpose today as it's always had: hating men and obtaining benefits to women
/r/MensRights30/04/20 08:28 PM
4

no, feminism was always just manhating first wave feminists wanted rights but rejected responsibility and it's what they fought for buttressed by antimale bigotry getting rights without responsibility is in no way trying to be treated equally to men at all
/r/PussyPassDenied30/04/20 08:07 PM
1

See, I can make insults too. but are they accurate? you can admit it; you have shitlib anti-gun political positions pushing for gun control is a men's rights issue. by violating the rights of mostly men! bold move to attack innocent individual men to "protect men," but surely it will attract more men to MRA
/r/MensRights25/04/20 06:48 AM
1

this isn't really about "other people" and "their perceptions" this is about you and a shitlib political position you have you want to know what will turn men away from MRA? if they only talk about shitlib nonsense instead of being willing to talk about any issue which effects men
/r/MensRights25/04/20 06:06 AM
1

most gun owners are men so gun grabber bullshit would mostly effect men most gun grabber bullshit is pushed with antimale crap, too come to think of it, we really should talk more about it!
/r/MensRights24/04/20 04:31 PM
1

first step would be to read the article which links the bill
/r/MensRights24/04/20 10:18 AM
1

you're a dishonest antimale bigot dude whether or not they got paid is irrelevant to whether or not they were forced to fight and die... which they were
/r/MensRights29/03/20 12:10 AM
1

yawn the link he posted is to a book which is sourced you dishonest moron did you even look at it?
/r/MensRights28/03/20 11:43 PM
1

peasants were absolutely forced to fight in wars men and not women were obligated to fight in wars if you don't know what you're talking about, why do you keep making assertions about it?
/r/MensRights28/03/20 11:26 PM
1

they were absolutely forced you don't have a clue what you're talking about
/r/MensRights28/03/20 11:07 PM
1

... because the husband had a legal obligation to support the wife and children that's the reason they had the responsibility of holding "the property"... because they carried all the obligation
/r/MensRights28/03/20 10:05 PM
1

lemme know when you make an argument instead of derpy vapid assertions which you run away from when asked to explain
/r/MensRights26/03/20 05:54 AM
1

you're an idiot
/r/MensRights26/03/20 05:49 AM
1

well hey, you will lose again badly but at least you can pat yourself on the back for your principles or whatever
/r/MensRights26/03/20 05:48 AM
1

when your opponents want supremacy and you beg for equality, you lose
/r/MensRights26/03/20 05:41 AM
1

shouldn't the draft be 100% female to pay for past injustices?
/r/MensRights26/03/20 05:07 AM
1

feminism is manhating
/r/MensRights13/03/20 12:06 PM
0

imagine claiming a person who only does what they're forced to do to avoid jail is the same as a person who volunteers to be the spear of the state what a stupid comment if anyone is being black and white, it's the retard claiming doing anything, no matter how slight, is the same as volunteering to do a lot
/r/MGTOW30/01/20 12:29 AM
0

your comment and argument is shit run along
/r/MGTOW30/01/20 12:18 AM
1

most of your tax dollars go towards welfare so anyone working and paying tax is directly supporting this gynocentric system. if you don't pay taxes, you go to jail if you don't volunteer to be a pig or for the military, you go to jail? enslavement to the government as a tax cow isn't voluntary, but military/pig absolutely is voluntary don't be an idiot
/r/MGTOW29/01/20 02:36 PM
2

sure you will kiddo you'll be the exception to military cucks
/r/MGTOW29/01/20 02:34 PM
2

We were each other’s first everything’s sure I bet the only reason he "knows" this because she told him this. It's always so funny the way people are revealed to be manipulative liars about one of, if not THE, most important thing to men (paternity), and dudes will continue to idolize their romance story.
/r/MGTOW13/01/20 01:08 PM
12

literally the definition of cuckold
/r/MGTOW11/01/20 11:57 AM
1

do you not know what nihilism means? the post you responded to contradicts nihilism because it expresses a positive moral claim
/r/MGTOW10/01/20 04:17 PM
2

Nobody called you an incel or anything else I actually wrote you implied it... because you did: then maybe that explains why you have such a tough time with women. You can dishonestly claim that's not what you were trying to do, but it's right there for everyone to read. Imaging trying to shame a MGTOW by telling them they can't get women. lol lemme guess, you're going to go with the "you're not a real man"? yawn go concern troll somewhere else
/r/MGTOW10/01/20 03:53 PM
3

you're totes mgtow who just so happen to resort to implying actual MGTOW who disagree with you are incels yawn this dude tops off his first post by declaring the post "plays into FDS"... while at the exact same time playing into simp behavior by justifying being a simp and paying for women it's textbook concern trolling and the dude is a blue pill simp who came up with another justification posthoc for his simpery
/r/MGTOW10/01/20 03:05 PM
1

if men stopped worshipping women, they would still be content with little pats on the head as they throw themselves into the fire to benefit others men should stop accepting lip service to sacrifice themselves and praising firemen is just one step in a long process... and yet that's exactly what we do by claiming dudes fighting fires are "heroes" and "role models" no they're not and praising them as such just creates the new crop if you don't believe me, all you have to do is look at the blue pi…
/r/MGTOW10/01/20 08:57 AM
39

Who gives a fuck about the well-being of "financially unstable" men? The real issue with suffering men is how it affects women. There aint no way in hell I will ever defend or support this garbage system or garbage culture. GYOW
/r/MGTOW08/01/20 12:49 PM
2

stop caring about appealing to other people if instead of all the other content, you legitimately think randos calling people "kings" is going to be the feather that breaks the camel's back then you're an idiot some rando guy with a new account and no other submissions except for this concern trolling tone policing? Fuck off dude
/r/MGTOW08/01/20 07:03 AM
4

That's not what the company claimed. You don't know what you're talking about, but please listen to these poor little adult women who were filmed signing their contracts. What they're saying while trying to get paid millions is definitely, for sure, totally honest! All of the fraud claims are contrary to the agreements the women actually signed and they're claiming they were told extracontract things which weren't in the agreements they signed... on film. The only evidence presented are the wome…
/r/MGTOW03/01/20 09:40 PM
7

that's not what the company claimed or what the women agreed to this is yet another example of women pretending to be children when it benefits them and the legal system endorsing that and acting to protect these poor, little adult women who were filmed signing their contracts
/r/MGTOW03/01/20 09:27 PM
5

imagine being a white knight and accusing other men of "cucking" for a company
/r/MGTOW03/01/20 09:27 PM
1

that doesn't change the fundamental point of the post: don't be a sacrificial object to be disposed of for the benefit of others the dog's purpose is to be attacked and attacked to serve the interests of the shepherd similarly, male disposability is about using men as objects for the benefit of women and the others they don't appreciate you for it and will discard you as soon as you're not useful don't be the dog
/r/MGTOW03/01/20 05:12 AM
0

Soldiers have jobs, too, and yet that doesn't mean they're not an example of male disposability. Men are expected and shamed to make themselves into objects to serve others. This is true for randos on the street as well as their families and children. Men are treated as worth less than women and expected to sacrifice their time, bodies, and lives to support and protect them. The dog is used as a disposable object to benefit the sheep and by proxy the shepherd. That's its use. If it didn't do tha…
/r/MGTOW03/01/20 05:10 AM
5

It looks disposable to us Having a use doesn't make something not disposable. Just because a paper towel is appreciated by the person using it doesn't mean it's not disposable. Same goes for K9 dogs they use dogs in many situations because they're easier to replace and worth less than humans That's what people mean when they say "male disposability." The dog is sacrificed to protect and provide value for the sheep and the shepherd. Similarly, males are expected to sacrifice their time, bodies, a…
/r/MGTOW02/01/20 09:57 PM
3

male disposability is directly relevant to this sub
/r/MGTOW02/01/20 09:46 PM
4

weird how statistics work, huh?
/r/MGTOW30/12/19 09:16 AM
2

bye felicia
/r/MGTOW25/12/19 03:47 PM
2

lots of dudes say this and yet the number of men who choose circumcision as adults for non-medical reasons is basically none you didn't have a choice and I'm sorry that was done to you no amount of rationalization about how you would have done it will change that
/r/MGTOW21/12/19 01:33 PM
9

Ignore this dude. They're an anti-MGTOW inceltears clown spewing lying bullshit.
/r/MGTOW21/12/19 07:25 AM
9

saying the man walking away from her and ignoring her pleas is justified, i.e., the man's actual behavior, is not saying the rape is justified you lying retard
/r/MGTOW21/12/19 07:21 AM
7

Gais, I totes am not just an orange man bad meme. I had a conservative family! Now, listen to these dumb talking points. Uh, okay. Glad you started this one off honestly. After 3 years he's STILL failed to repeal and replace the ACA Yep, but at least he neutered it by reducing the penalty to zero. His foreign policy is a disaster Yeah, pulling troops outta endless wars is such a disaster! Getting a win-win trade deal to replace NAFTA is such a disaster! Getting NATO to meet their obligations und…
/r/MGTOW11/12/19 07:48 PM
3

all constitutional rights aren't conditional on citizenship and many states do, in fact, legally recognize the unborn as persons That's the constitution that's what some clownish idiots wrote in an opinion you haven't read decades ago and one which will likely be changed or neutered and when it changes if you don't like it, you can leave
/r/MGTOW11/12/19 07:37 PM
2

concern trolling straight up misogyny lol
/r/PussyPassDenied09/12/19 12:22 AM
-3

rando sensitive girl comes to PPD and wants to whine fuck off
/r/PussyPassDenied09/12/19 12:05 AM
4

you don't get to tell us what we upvote or downvote and you don't get to tell us what is posted or not posted fuck off with your tone policing go whine somewhere else
/r/PussyPassDenied08/12/19 11:20 PM
1

If it wasn't about domination then, why did the women of her mother's generation absolutely refuse to get the responsibility which men had all along? The claim that feminism was fine when it started and now it's morphed into something ridiculous is total nonsense. It was always ridiculous, it was always a female supremacy movement, and it was always about hating men. All you have to do for that proof is to read the foundational documents of the women who started and supported it the entire time.…
/r/MensRights10/11/19 02:35 PM
1

you standing above the fray sure has worked against women framing ya'll to be women haters any day now you sucking the tit of gynocentrism and begging for fair treat will work any day now MGTOW is about walking away from women and walking away from what society demands of us. Criticizing women, which you dishonest call "hate" per usual, is part of the justification for both of those things.
/r/MensRights28/07/19 09:17 PM
1

feminism controls pretty much all institutions of power in western societies if that's "falling apart," I pray for the day men's movements are in the same position until then, all you're doing is neutering men's movements to appeal to people who aren't going to care about you anyway it's dumb tactics
/r/MensRights28/07/19 08:57 PM
1

you want to know what happens when you refuse to use the same tactics your opponents use, especially ones who have far more power than you? you lose but at least you can pat yourself on the back for being such a good person that's why he's calling ya'll puppets of gynocentrism because you neuter men and the men's movement with your moralistic pearl clutching
/r/MensRights28/07/19 05:37 PM
1

I'm an attorney who did a couple years in the trenches in criminal defense. It physically pained me to watch the OP.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 01:25 AM
1

Never talk to the police.
/r/MensRights24/07/19 12:18 AM
1

... ESH means that the man is an asshole, it just also means the woman is the asshole too
/r/MensRights22/07/19 01:31 PM
3

imagine calling a guy an asshole because he is willing to allow the stepdaughter to stay and continue to be supported even though the kid is not his
/r/MensRights22/07/19 01:11 PM
1

that's not mischaracterizing the post any ESH posts are calling the OP an asshole, it's also calling the mother an asshole
/r/MensRights22/07/19 01:11 PM
1

can you even imagine a post doing well which pictured a sobbing woman because they had their child ripped away from them?
/r/MensRights19/07/19 10:50 PM
1

Don't you know? Men being weak or sad is cringy.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 10:43 PM
1

is reading comprehension an ongoing problem for you?
/r/MensRights19/07/19 04:24 PM
1

the baby isn't her body
/r/MensRights19/07/19 11:38 AM
1

There is no child here to father that's convenient and many disagree Its as much wrong to claim to have any rights over a pregnancy as there is for a woman to bully a man into one he didn't want to support.. it's as much wrong to claim a man has any rights, e.g., the right to know he was a father, as it is to enslave men to pay stupid amounts of mommy support for children they didn't want wtf? maybe that sounded good in your head, but it's retarded
/r/MensRights19/07/19 11:37 AM
1

imagine claiming father's rights have nothing to do with men's rights
/r/MensRights19/07/19 10:29 AM
1

Now pushing feminist activism? LOL NPR has been obviously biased as long as I can remember and it should be defunded.
/r/MensRights19/07/19 09:01 AM
1

Don't ask that question, just get married because... well, marriage avoids loneliness which makes you less likely for "premature death"
/r/MensRights18/07/19 04:54 PM
1

What a goofy comment. What benefit does marriage have which I can't get without marriage? The solution isn't to avoid marriage. The solution is to fix the broken marriage laws. I can do one and not do the other. Let me know when those marriage laws are going to get changed, but until they are men should avoid marriage. Also, I can get pretty much all the benefits of marriage without marriage. Loneliness is a major killer divorce is pretty deadly as well, mainly because it results in a man having…
/r/MensRights18/07/19 04:48 PM
1

Wow /u/pm_me_intense_femdom is a piece of shit and that subreddit is absolute garbage imagine being such an unempathetic piece of garbage that they tell someone they don't have a vagina and therefore can't "speak about her issue" and then telling a boy who feels violated that he was mutilated that his feelings are wrong/exaggerated/blah blah the fact this insufferable retard is upvoted is really all you need to know about that subreddit
/r/MensRights16/07/19 10:14 AM
1

the thing I linked you directly addresses that study which you totally read
/r/MensRights16/07/19 02:00 AM
1

... uh, yeah, it was created as a bronze age ritual in place of child sacrifice you obviously didn't read anything I linked and you're not really interested in discussing this beyond repeating your ignorant gut intutions good luck with that
/r/MensRights16/07/19 01:54 AM
1

One, the evidence supporting that actually isn't very good. Two, that's a great argument to be made to a person when they're old enough to consent. Babies aren't having sex. In some african nation hiv rates actually dropped due to circumcision. there actually isn't a correlation between male genital cutting and HIV rates
/r/MensRights16/07/19 01:41 AM
1

I’m glad I won’t have to be cleaning any smega from my foreskin when I’m 80 years old. right, instead your skin will be dry and crack frequently leading to bleeding
/r/MensRights16/07/19 01:38 AM
1

is this the last iteration of this comment or you going to have another few goes after I respond?
/r/MensRights15/07/19 12:16 PM
1

if you vote for Democrats, you sure as shit have not
/r/MensRights15/07/19 12:10 PM
1

Okay, here's the generalization that actually matters: the left with power and influence, i.e., the left that actually matters, is anti-male
/r/MensRights15/07/19 12:03 PM
1

the dear colleague letter and the fiasco over its removal being an easy example
/r/MensRights15/07/19 11:09 AM
1

because for quite a while, "the left" has been what has both attacked men and prevented men from getting any sort of relief from all of our "privilege" like, are you serious? the last 2 years may as well be an advertisement on the left shitting on men
/r/MensRights15/07/19 11:01 AM
1

no matter how much you attempt to talk about the differences between liberalism and "social justice," it's hard to distract from the reality that "liberals" and the "left-wing" are beholden to feminists and anti-male interests who are then pandered to with increasingly explicit anti-male garbage
/r/MensRights15/07/19 10:44 AM
1

gather around kiddies poppa is going to educate MGTOW what MGTOW means
/r/MensRights15/07/19 10:20 AM
1

Here is a good start.
/r/MensRights15/07/19 10:08 AM
1

I'm not claiming my opinion is fact. Please go back and reread my comment.
/r/MensRights14/07/19 02:00 AM
1

... sure they do, just like you and whenever they have power to do anything, they shit on men
/r/MensRights14/07/19 12:55 AM
1

I can't be bothered to actually post any explanation or support for my comments, but please answer this dumb question much ado about nothing seriously?
/r/MensRights14/07/19 12:33 AM
1

except conservatives have done things to support men's rights, e.g., repealing the god awful "Deal Colleague" letter and pushing for better protections for people accused in Title IX kangaroo courts and another example is criminalizing and increasing punishments for people who falsely accuse people of sexual assault/rape and another example of Trump signing actually criminal reform which has freed thousands of men
/r/MensRights14/07/19 12:26 AM
1

your opinion doesn't matter as you had no choice
/r/MensRights13/07/19 09:27 PM
1

"wikipedia tells me they're bad so I believe they're bad and refuse to read for myself"
/r/MensRights13/07/19 09:25 PM
1

you don't support men's rights in any practical way if you support Democrats or socialism because you likely support and vote for people who are the enemies of men and attack men all the time
/r/MensRights13/07/19 09:18 PM
1

this is against sitewide policy another user wrote this and I'm repeating it: I would send those Moderators a reminder that banning people from one subreddit for participation in another, is not allowed, as per Reddit Admins For all Moderators: "we expect you to manage communities as isolated communities and not use a breach of one set of community rules to ban a user from another community" - https://www.reddit.com/help/healthycommunities/#section_management_of_multiple_communities From the Red…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/19 01:27 AM
1

this is against sitewide policy send this to the mod group: I would send those Moderators a reminder that banning people from one subreddit for participation in another, is not allowed, as per Reddit Admins For all Moderators: "we expect you to manage communities as isolated communities and not use a breach of one set of community rules to ban a user from another community" - https://www.reddit.com/help/healthycommunities/#section_management_of_multiple_communities From the Reddit Admins specifi…
/r/PussyPassDenied09/07/19 01:23 AM
1

I have no doubt that if a TON of money was spent marketing the women's world cup more people would watch it, but that doesn't make it a good decision. I would guess most people who would be motivated to watch because of marketing are in a similar boat to you. They turned it on briefly, don't really care about it and certainly won't buy merch or something similar. Most sports fans simply aren't interested in affirmative action sports and that's what women's sports are. Sports takes tens of millio…
/r/MensRights08/07/19 06:47 PM
1

This TED video on shame is really a good one for people to watch about this subject. Men are quiet because the women in their lives shit on them more than anyone when they show vulnerability. The part I'm specifically referring to starts @ 16:00 And here is a great video from Paul Elam about this and how it effects men. Men aren't vulnerable because when they're vulnerable they're committing genetic suicide. They get punished severely for doing it.
/r/MensRights08/07/19 06:33 PM
1

we know it's "worth their time" because they show up to play if it wasn't "worth their time" they wouldn't show up to play
/r/MensRights08/07/19 06:17 PM
1

or there is less marketing because people don't care about women's soccer
/r/MensRights08/07/19 06:12 PM
1

you called him a liar which is what I'm, talking about you don't actually know for certain that is true, you think it's true
/r/MensRights08/07/19 12:51 AM
1

Ford lied about a personal therapist, that she was illegally renting the front of her house, and that she put in a second door because she was just so afraid there was more lying too if what I said isn't evidence, then your claims about Kavanaugh lying sure as shit doesn't meet that burden either and yet you described it as such I'm beginning to think this is more about you and your dislike of Kavanaugh than it is about any sort of principled stance about describing things lacking a conviction. …
/r/MensRights07/07/19 04:34 PM
1

I do have evidence: the accusation itself fails to meet even the basic outlines of a legitimate accusation. Every person who she claims was there denies this happened.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 04:13 PM
1

accusations where the accuser can't get their story straight, can't remember the time, the day, the month, or even the year and avoids any statement of fact which can actually be disproved and any thing they do claim is denied by the available people they named should be treated as false
/r/MensRights07/07/19 04:02 PM
1

It definitely is. I hope to make my society the same way.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 03:48 PM
1

There isn't a current focus on equality, the focus is simply against men.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 02:30 PM
1

and the likelihood one of those legitimate medical complaints would require genital cutting through the removal of the foreskin is even more rare than that.
/r/MensRights07/07/19 01:31 PM
1

I'm not claiming it's some paragon of boring objective journalism. I'm saying that it's fine and on par or better with tons of other crap posted by vox, salon, and various others.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 11:54 AM
1

Nah, it's better than stuff like vox which is spammed all over this site.
/r/MensRights05/07/19 10:43 AM
1

and that's why you'll lose because the people who don't like you and don't give a fuck about your interests will not give you the same benefit of the doubt the result is you lose
/r/MensRights02/07/19 04:11 AM
1

Which historians making what claims? In order to believe men had it better than women, you would have to ignore the giant mountains of male bodies created from wars, conflicts, and the danger of providing for women and children. Women could do that if they wanted. It turns out, some of them did. Most of them didn't because they would prefer to have children and having children meant needing someone to support them and their children. But, you know, women just didn't have agency or something. You…
/r/MensRights30/06/19 07:29 PM
1

Men had it better than women for thousands of years after civilization started. lol, total and utter bullshit
/r/MensRights30/06/19 08:42 AM
1

"slightly larger" 2/3 is not "slightly larger" than 1/3
/r/MensRights26/06/19 03:40 PM
1

No, those are not the only "main" reasons. Some people simply do not see value in college, thinks college is toxic and antimale, and many other reasons why they don't think college is worth it. Because they earned too low a grade there are colleges with open admissions dude Sanders' plan aims to help the second group You mean Sander's other plan? Whereby he gives free college to women, the majority of students? Yeah, that, too, will benefit more women than men and that, too, will be paid for by …
/r/MensRights25/06/19 08:23 PM
1

Um... no, not "countless men." It's included in the OP. It would benefit 1/3rd men and 2/3rd women at the expensive (at least immediately) of taxpayers... which are mostly men. It would benefit mostly women at the expense of mostly men. Also, no, it wouldn't benefit "mostly poor people." Is it your understanding that, on average, people with college loans are "poor people"? lol
/r/MensRights25/06/19 06:14 PM
1

Yes. There have been cases of students across the US suing schools for defunct programs/accreditation. I do not know enough about this subject of the law to give you better information. I would contact a lawyer to get a free consultation.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 05:32 PM
1

Sue the college for fraud.
/r/MensRights25/06/19 04:55 PM
1

which means benefiting mostly women at the cost of mostly men
/r/MensRights25/06/19 04:50 PM
1

You either didn't read the things you're linking or you're an idiot. No honest person, the things you're linking including, has good data on the complication rates for male genital cutting. They're recommending something without knowing the cost of doing it. They're essentially ignoring the costs. Additionally, they posit no value to the foreskin itself. Frankly, those organizations should be ashamed of themselves, they're a bunch of disgusting hacks letting culture and political pressure dictat…
/r/MensRights25/06/19 04:16 PM
1

Are ear piercings mutilation? Cosmetic Labia surgery? Gastric bypass is mutilation of the digestive system? Hyperbole. we're not against circumcision generally if adults want to hack up their bodies, they should be able to do that we're against forcibly doing it a baby boy
/r/MensRights24/06/19 11:15 PM
1

Not really, no. I guess all those doctors are pretty much the same as anti-vaxxers, huh?
/r/MensRights24/06/19 08:41 PM
1

because they're helpless and can't resist? that's disgusting dude
/r/MensRights24/06/19 08:39 PM
1

I didn't say it did you fucking retard
/r/MensRights23/06/19 08:40 PM
1

uncontrolled emotions lol
/r/MensRights23/06/19 08:36 PM
1

I agree with you. I think women generally, even ones who should know quite about this issue like the woman in the video, are so unempathetic and so ignorant when it comes to men and men's experiences. One big criticism I have with the video is the way the speaker at least implies the problem is men and that men need to change to be better. It's not about how therapists, the researchers, etc., need to change to suit their work for men, it's like they imply there is something wrong with men and th…
/r/MensRights23/06/19 07:32 PM
1

You may enjoy this TED talk.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 05:09 PM
1

what a stupid statement I obviously want to change the law you idiot
/r/MensRights23/06/19 04:47 PM
1

they don't follow from the former statement
/r/MensRights23/06/19 04:33 PM
1

What a retarded line of logic. Father's rights are men's rights whether you think mother's shouldn't be allowed to kill the unborn or not.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 03:34 PM
1

of course fathers rights are mensrights which retards are upvoting this idiocy?
/r/MensRights23/06/19 03:32 PM
1

I would force you to donate blood if you caused them to be sick.
/r/MensRights23/06/19 03:28 PM
1

sure I can I can tell you that you should do whatever I like
/r/MensRights22/06/19 07:39 PM
1

Oh, you're just making an "is" description. I am making an "ought" argument. Marriage laws are retarded and anti-male. Don't get married.
/r/MensRights22/06/19 06:46 PM
1

you don't have to be chivalrous no matter what and you shouldn't be chivalrous
/r/MensRights22/06/19 06:36 PM
1

oh, shucks, I've never considered that before it's her body!
/r/MensRights22/06/19 06:27 PM
1

imagine thinking father's rights aren't men's rights
/r/MensRights22/06/19 06:27 PM
1

who cares?
/r/MensRights22/06/19 06:19 PM
1

Yeah, they treat women they're not attracted to like they treat men. No wonder this woman is horrified by that.
/r/MensRights17/06/19 06:50 PM
1

you will never actually address this problem as long as you pedastalizing your girlfriend what you're doing right now is just bottling up your emotions and pushing them down and hiding them and trying to take all the criticism on yourself this isn't healthy and you will not feel better doing thing, at least long term
/r/MensRights16/06/19 04:46 AM
1

Yeah? because after reading all of your posts here, it appears your game of chess is you doing what your girlfriend wants and being what your girlfriend wants and you having little desire of your own look at how you reel when anyone suggests any criticism of your girlfriend "no no no, my girlfriend basically walks on water and I love her to death and blah blah blah" let me guess, she was your first real relationship?
/r/MensRights16/06/19 04:35 AM
1

good luck bud don't link things you didn't read
/r/MensRights10/06/19 05:18 PM
1

Did you read the study? You didn't bother reading my comment so I'm going to guess you didn't read the study at all. I'm not interested in your popsci nonsense kiddo. Show me you managed to read my comment and the "study" you're linking or this will be my last response.
/r/MensRights10/06/19 05:13 PM
1

RAND is a garbage institute, I don't know why anyone would post them like they're some sort of objective analysis of most topics. Just look at their linked analysis. Instead of talking about per soldier cost estimates or deployment issues, they talk about total estimates. The reason is because the per soldier total is significantly higher than non-trans people. Their paper is essentially, "Well, they're such a small group and the effect on the military is small." So what? As soon as you see some…
/r/MensRights10/06/19 05:02 PM
1

her life pursuits being a research assistant at a wall street firm who wanted to marry her boss and then have children? stop robbing women of their own agency dude She's not just an ex employee and to compare her to one is dishonest. that's the point the reason she made $40,000,000,000 isn't about her contribution to Amazon at all, it's about the marriage and yet you want to bicker and moan and be dishonest about her contribution to Amazon you're caught in a circular logic loop and can't get out
/r/MensRights31/05/19 05:28 PM
0

weird no other employees who contributed far more to Amazon made $40,000,000,000... could you name another one? in fact, the only reason Mackenzie made that money is because of marriage actually, her "contribution" is wholly irrelevant and she would still be owed so you attempting to focus on that ignoring it is irrelevant to getting paid due to marriage laws is dishonest garbage
/r/MensRights31/05/19 05:10 PM
1

no she didn't
/r/MensRights31/05/19 12:46 PM
1

No, she didn't. She worked as a research assistant at a wall street firm and married her senior vice president boss. They moved across country and Bezos started Amazon. Shortly thereafter, she got pregnant and was a stay at home mom. Pretending this in any way justifies $40,000,000,000 is absolutely ridiculous. Marriage laws in this country are insane.
/r/MensRights31/05/19 12:45 PM
1

No one cares about circumcision itself, we care about doing it to a newborn baby. Honestly circumcision has health benefits Not really, no. And even if we ignored the issues with those claims, the "benefits" are hilariously small... something on the order of cutting hundreds of babies in order to prevent a single case of UTI... something which is treated by a basic antibiotic.
/r/MensRights30/05/19 07:16 PM
1

feminists and tradcucks are two sides of the same gynocentric coin with men being the slaves I will never believe a word they say until they start voicing their opinions to change family court laws. don't believe them until they eschew marriage altogether because they understand how unfair or it or at the very least sign a pre-nup and post-nup agreement giving up all rights to equitable distribution, alimony, etc.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 08:23 PM
1

morality should never be determined by medical doctors
/r/MensRights27/05/19 06:00 PM
1

Bleh tradcucks Marriage was always a raw deal for men, it's just gotten so bad that men are opting out.
/r/MensRights27/05/19 05:58 PM
1

... like where?
/r/MensRights26/05/19 12:19 PM
1

most MRAs are moderate or even leftist. total nonsense
/r/MensRights26/05/19 03:06 AM
1

I'm an atheist you retard you can't even troll well
/r/MensRights22/05/19 12:26 AM
1

it is when their behavior kills another person it's that simple you writing "durka durka, women's bodies, durka durka" means absolutely nothing to a person who thinks the women are killing a person you're a total moron
/r/MensRights22/05/19 12:12 AM
1

you missed something
/r/MensRights21/05/19 11:51 PM
1

yeah, it's that simple Put that on your tinder profile. Guarantee that won't be a problem for you. is reading comprehension an ongoing problem for you?
/r/MensRights21/05/19 11:45 PM
1

Show me the graves of the people who died at Treblinka! Please tell me you're not this clownishly stupid.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 07:36 PM
1

they quite clearly do
/r/MensRights19/05/19 06:52 PM
1

It's really something in a mensrights sub for the most upvoted comment to be: yeah, it's unfair for men but they should just take it.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 08:10 AM
1

"ultra right" rofl
/r/MensRights19/05/19 08:09 AM
1

so mad
/r/MensRights19/05/19 08:09 AM
1

click the downvote kiddo, I hope it makes you feel better
/r/MensRights19/05/19 08:07 AM
1

it's clear ya'll are incapable of having an honest or genuine discussion about this
/r/MensRights19/05/19 07:50 AM
1

I'm pretty disgusted with how dishonest and cavalier people are when talking about killing babies.
/r/MensRights19/05/19 07:42 AM
1

men and women should be appalled by the accepting of killing babies
/r/MensRights19/05/19 07:12 AM
5

It's more insidious than that. They want to be treated like adults when it benefits them and they wanted to be treated like children when it benefits them. This is a power play and nothing else.
/r/MensRights18/05/19 08:17 PM
29

After watching my mentor get falsely accused of inappropriate conduct after he criticized a fellow summer attorney's crap work, I have always implemented the Billy Graham Rule at work. I am almost never alone with a female coworker and I am never alone with a female subordinate. Door remains open. My admin sits in or listens to any discussions. I am not rare, this phenomena is sweeping professional life and it will harm women. Men only mentor out of the kindness of their hearts. Women have radic…
/r/MensRights18/05/19 08:11 AM
1

Excellent post. "Incels" and the vicious bullying they suffer on the internet and in life is just another example of how little society generally, women, and men care about unsuccessful males: they're worse than worthless. Never turn yourself into a weapon on behalf of man-haters to attack fellow men. No amount of MRAs, TRPs, MGTOWs, etc., also bullying and attacking incels is going to make man-haters or the gynocentric society stop trying to associate you with them or attempt to shame you as th…
/r/MensRights07/05/19 02:26 AM
1

Sure they do! They can get the benefit of it and also use it as an example to justify their victim narrative at the same time.
/r/MensRights22/04/19 09:59 AM
1

you're a clown dude
/r/MensRights21/04/19 06:36 AM
1

Or, what actually happened: I responded after reading the first line of your comment. Was doing something else, read the rest of your comment and realized mine didn't adequately respond to yours and rewrote the comment to one which did before I got the notification you had responded to me.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 06:17 AM
2

Yeah, I apologize for that. I already edited my comment before you responded.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 05:57 AM
1

do you typically feel a burning desire to compliment women when something negative about them is pointed out? Women are followers. If the culture didn't approve of mutilating the genitals of little boys, they would approve of it. But, they do and their word is what doctors use to mutilate their sons.
/r/MensRights21/04/19 05:44 AM
1

most boys are circumcised because their mothers approve of it
/r/MensRights21/04/19 05:18 AM
1

Yes they do. There is a reason a fund is set-up by the government to compensate people who suffer harm because of vaccines.
/r/MensRights13/04/19 09:10 AM
1

the baby is the one who should have the choice
/r/MensRights13/04/19 09:08 AM
1

Almost all of his policies except stopping male genital cutting is anti-male.
/r/MensRights20/03/19 12:43 AM
1

yeah, the status quo is the result of men and men's rights groups "taking the high road" you pat yourself on the back for being more of the same and attempting to shame people who don't care
/r/MensRights15/03/19 06:26 PM
1

Nah, we'll complain about them doing it too.
/r/MensRights15/03/19 05:51 AM
1

The ACLU has turned into a clownish joke of its former self. When I started there, I was promised liberal values. After a while, I realized that was a lie and it's taken over by loony progressives.
/r/MensRights15/03/19 05:25 AM
1

there is something pretty adorable about a naruto anime fan calling others incels fuck off
/r/MensRights13/03/19 03:56 AM
1

If killing the baby wasn't an option, it would necessarily mean that. Someone "choosing" to have a kid doesn't mean "choosing" to pay child support for 18 years. The only reason that's the case in both situations is the state forces it to happen.
/r/MensRights11/03/19 01:02 PM
1

If someone has sex knowing a possible consequence is a baby, then they know the consequence and forcing them to carry the baby to term for 9mo is not slavery. Carrying a baby to term is less time and less effort than 18 years of slavery.
/r/MensRights10/03/19 02:16 PM
1

How does him being forced to labor for 18 years not slavery?
/r/MensRights10/03/19 02:08 PM
1

Why is it not slavery for a man to be forced to care for their children if they wanted them at some point?
/r/MensRights10/03/19 01:36 PM
1

what is being "cherrypicked"? you have a pretty difficult time with word-choice
/r/MensRights07/03/19 06:59 PM
1

Sure. And I'm pointing out you're denying father's choice. Why is it okay for men to combat their lack of choice by denying women their choice? Why is it not okay? You think it's okay for women to combat their own lack of choice by denying men. You are pro-male choice and anti-female choice. I actually didn't express a position at all.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 06:57 PM
1

the fetus is absolutely alive
/r/MensRights07/03/19 05:33 PM
1

Women's unilateral choice necessarily denies the father's choice. The choices necessarily conflict. Why would you try to characterize this as being "anti-choice" when both sides are necessarily anti and pro-choice on the issue? You are anti-male choice and pro-female choice. You dont combat your lack of choice by preventing others from choosing. Why? Women having the choice necessarily removes men's choice. It's odd that doesn't seem to bother you despite it going against this rule of yours. I g…
/r/MensRights07/03/19 05:29 PM
1

to be "medically not alive" or "not alive according to society" (i.e., legally), having no brain function is not enough
/r/MensRights07/03/19 03:42 PM
1

which is why I am trying to get you to talk about personhood instead of "alive"
/r/MensRights07/03/19 03:33 PM
1

You made an assertion that "no brain function = not alive according" to medicine and society. That's not a true statement.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 03:33 PM
1

Then argue about whether it's a person or not, not whether it's "alive" or not. If a person has no brain function, they are considered to not be alive medically and societally. This isn't actually true.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 03:15 PM
1

Which legal claim would there be available against the mother? shouldn't he sue her for her decision anyways? Not the clinic? He "should" sue anyone who has culpability in the wrongful death of his unborn child for which a claim exists. You repeatedly asserting this was a mere "medical procedure to remove a clump of cells" doesn't actually mean anything. If a doctor performed some act which necessarily caused the death of an unborn person, they would be liable to both the mother and the father. …
/r/MensRights07/03/19 03:12 PM
1

I mean, it's absolutely alive. Just because you don't think it's a person doesn't mean it's not alive.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 02:58 PM
1

whose choice? The story is about a father having no choice.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 02:56 PM
1

would harm men men pay the overwhelming majority of the bill and don't use as much of the "services" since it's often men stuck at the bottom of the social ladder even a slight glance at the countries with these policies show men foot the bill and don't get the majority of services Also please, don't embarrass yourself by calling it "euro politics" lol
/r/MensRights07/03/19 10:25 AM
1

then we can still do our best to make the situation better for other men what you're proposing harms men generally for the support of women generally ignored it you mean like when you ignored parts of his comment and went on a rant? Who focuses on a single issue when choosing a party? people who care about that issue don't obviously prioritize other issues Are you sure it's ironic? it's ironic because you're doing the same thing and accusing the guy of being a troll... making it appear you're a …
/r/MensRights07/03/19 10:15 AM
1

Big government comes at the expense of men.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 09:43 AM
1

That's not actually what he said. No, he got convicted because a judge allowed 5 women to accuse him in the same "trial." Typically this isn't done because it is extremely prejudicial and lends no evidence whatsoever to the actual accusations of the case being brought. The first trial, the judge only allowed one woman. There was a hung jury. The second trial, the judge allowed a bunch more. The weight of that prejudice likely caused the conviction.
/r/MensRights07/03/19 09:33 AM
1

It doesn't matter what you would do because your choice doesn't and didn't matter.
/r/MensRights01/03/19 01:24 AM
1

It's sadly irrelevant what you think about something in which you have no choice.
/r/MensRights28/02/19 09:23 AM
1

an effort convince yourself that you must be an elevated mind and that’s why we disagree. I should have written this differently. I guessed you may take this in some idiotic direction and boy did you deliver. What I meant was that you patronizingly talking about things being "confusing" to others is laughable given I have more education than you do and from better school. You're the person trying to talk down to others and attempting to use the cult of "science" to do it. Sorry bud, I didn't rea…
/r/MensRights27/02/19 04:51 AM
1

humans taking part in climate change/global warming I didn't claim it wasn't. here is some more data on why small changes in degrees matter I didn't claim they "don't matter." More dishonest garbage much ado about nothing.
/r/MensRights27/02/19 02:31 AM
0

This is emphatically true. No, it's not. Every single model attempted has radically failed to accurately predict the changing climate and any evidence to the contrary is excused away to protect the narrative. The only value in science is its predictive value and climate science has wholly failed to do that. "Climate change" is the great disprovable theory and the hilariously dumb and deadly proposals environmental extremists have proposed are plainly ridiculous. The actual evidence which shows m…
/r/MensRights27/02/19 12:55 AM
1

What a profoundly stupid rule. Like, we chop their balls off, control their every movement by keeping them in cages, control their food, etc., and chopping of their tails, claws, ears is some sort of bridge too far? lol
/r/MensRights26/02/19 01:48 AM
1

you're a clown
/r/MensRights21/02/19 11:24 PM
1

you claim things "have the feel" because it allows you to avoid while also asserting something you can claim you weren't implying something something negative about the sub based on the OP... and I'll continue to think you're an ignorant clown good luck kiddo
/r/MensRights21/02/19 10:51 PM
1

how ironic
/r/MensRights21/02/19 10:35 PM
1

How would you know? Today is probably the first day you even knew this subreddit existed.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 10:33 PM
1

it really is a shame being anti-feminist means one has to be "far right" but that's because you're a biased clown who has no idea what they're talking about
/r/MensRights21/02/19 10:26 PM
1

which is why feminists opposed default split custody which would significantly reduce or eliminate mommy support, huh? Never listen to what these people say, look at what they do. What they do is attack men, preserve female power, and avoid obligations for anything.
/r/MensRights21/02/19 10:14 PM
1

I didn't write those posts didn't exist, I implied those posts aren't an accurate representation of the subreddit
/r/MensRights21/02/19 10:12 PM
1

yeah, that's an accurate representation of the posts and comments there
/r/MensRights21/02/19 10:08 PM
1

jesus that place is anti-male cancer
/r/MensRights21/02/19 10:07 PM
1

the feminist movement isn't that movement
/r/MensRights21/02/19 09:54 PM
1

I don't need to be a feminist to see what feminists actually do and what they advocate for and against. Instead of talking and vague ideas, I'm going to call myself a feminist and do something which attacks one of the privileges women currently get, e.g., mommy support. Both you and I know I would be viciously attacked for being anti-woman by "fellow" feminists. Feminists are not for the destruction of gender roles. They're for the destruction of obligations and expectations they don't like and …
/r/MensRights21/02/19 09:48 PM
1

no they don't, that's the point of the OP
/r/MensRights21/02/19 09:37 PM
1

shitting on feminists isn't shitting on women you dishonest clown
/r/MensRights21/02/19 09:36 PM
1

because feminists are the main hurdle to getting rights for me
/r/MensRights21/02/19 09:31 PM
1

lol
/r/MensRights06/02/19 06:20 AM
1

Your ignorance of voting systems theory noted. yawn... I didn't even bother reading the rest
/r/MensRights01/02/19 01:38 AM
1

Sure it is, it's just a matter of popularity with whom.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 12:53 AM
1

Not really. "Merit" in the context of a popularity contest would simply mean more popular. If it didn't mean anything, there would be no need for the rule anyway.
/r/MensRights01/02/19 12:23 AM
1

Except that's not what the commercial conveys, they commercial conveys there is something wrong with maleness itself. It's conveys the message that men are defective women instead of that men are their own group. You want to know why this is near the front page? Because anti-male garbage like your post is highly upvoted. Men are not defective women and no amount of your feminist anti-male bullshit will change that.l
/r/MensRights16/01/19 07:00 AM
1

The third most popular post is talking about how great the Gillette commercial is, with the popular comments talking about how great the Gillette commercial is, and anyone expressing disapproval is being attacked and downvoted to oblivion. I already wetshave with a DE safety razor, but that subReddit looks like cancer.
/r/MensRights15/01/19 05:52 PM
1

Wow Gillette. That's a bold move. I will never, ever buy your products again.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 07:51 PM
1

The real problem is not the "slaving away" No, that's the real problem. It's the root of the problem. Men are not disposable play things or workhorses for you and others to extract resources from. The change you want will never happen as long as men see it's their place to slave away for others.
/r/MensRights14/01/19 06:28 PM
1

Fair enough, I apologize for attempting to force you into a square hole. I don't think the goal is or was to oppress men, I think it's to convince them to sacrifice their time, their bodies, and their lives in order to produce so others can suck off their excess productivity. Their "oppression" of being manipulated, coerced, and forced into disposable objects for the benefits of others is coincidental. Likewise, slaves weren't turned into slaves to oppress them, they were turned into slaves to b…
/r/MensRights10/01/19 02:27 PM
1

Do you have any evidence that male suicide rates were lower before we allegedly "lost our way" and "lack purpose"? I see this sort statement claimed quite a bit; that the issues with men is they don't accept their roles as beasts of burden for others and take responsibility/obligation as their reason for living. It's almost always tradcons claiming this and typically enticing men back to the plantation to behave as slaves for others benefits. They reminiscence about these alleged olden times whe…
/r/MensRights10/01/19 01:29 PM
1

You mean the dude she described as "her boyfriend"? You didn't read the case documents, you didn't read the appellate court decision, and you don't know what you're talking about. I'm still waiting on that totally common example of: a 16 year old male tried as an adult, convicted of first degree murder, felony murder, and aggravated robbery in the early 2000s in Tennessee who served 15 years. So, I guess you're not going to do that? The idiots who stumble into her from /r/all really are an embar…
/r/MensRights10/01/19 01:03 PM
1

First, the "sex trafficked as a teen" is unsupported nonsense. Read the case notes or the appellate court decision. Second, go ahead and give me a case of a 16 year old male convicted of first degree murder, felony murder, and aggravated robbery in the early 2000s in Tennessee who served 15 years. Don't worry, I'll wait.
/r/MensRights10/01/19 12:18 PM
1

when you compare this to other similar cases, men do not get this sort of treatment
/r/MensRights10/01/19 09:09 AM
1

Total bullshit. Get a clue dude. Or don't, it's not like having a clue what you're talking about is popular on reddit. You just have to support The Narrative^tm.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 04:24 PM
2

Wow, the media is really running with this one and wholly ignoring any of the facts of the underling murder case. Who can blame them? It's not like anyone expects even the slightest amount of journalism or investigation these days as long as the story fits The Narrative<sup>tm.</sup> The media would have you believe the well-supported facts of the case were that a 16 year old sex-trafficking victim was being pimped out by piece of garbage who had addicted her to drugs and used that to force her …
/r/MensRights09/01/19 02:55 PM
15

A 16 year old with FAS who was basically a drugged sex slave for human garbage who used her to rob people. This is believable as long as you don't look at the underlying facts of the murder case, e.g., that "human garbage" was actually described by Ms. Brown as her "boyfriend," that her boyfriend answered the door when police arrived and Ms. Brown ran out saying, "Cut had nothing to do with this! I’ll tell you all everything!”, and that Ms. Brown did not implicate her boyfriend in any way. Her b…
/r/MensRights09/01/19 02:52 PM
1

No, the girl lied to him about her age.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 02:45 PM
17

It's pretty disgusting how much the dead guy who can't defend himself is being smeared in the media and by people in this thread. They never have actual evidence to support the various smears and speculations to assassinate the character of the murder victim. The woman lied, repeatedly, about this incident and was caught in those lies. Her story is unsupported by anything other than the story she concocted as a defense to her executing someone in premeditated murder. Why anyone would take her wo…
/r/MensRights09/01/19 02:21 PM
4

lol no, no it's not you ignorant retard
/r/MensRights09/01/19 02:16 PM
14

Oh, that's a typo. It should be brought, not bought. Yeah why am I not surprised by this. you've demonstrated you're ignorant, dishonest, and anti-male, the people here should ignore your ignorant anti-male bullshit but it looks like we can't help ourselves good luck with the rest of your anti-male white knighting bullshit
/r/MensRights09/01/19 02:09 PM
1

Did she? Where did she buy it? Who did she buy it from? she admitted it was her gun which she had in her purse when she was picked up you didn't bother reading the underlying details of the murder case, did you? I stopped reading there, you're ignorant and dishonest.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 12:23 PM
1

society being a group of people doesn't mean it's not nameless and faceless Stop trying to present my argument as some wishy washy fluff. I don't need to do anything, that is your argument. It's attempting to diffuse blame in order to quell outrage about a murderous prostitute getting clemency... a situation in which no male would be granted something similar in a similar situation. dishonestly yawn that ends this discussion
/r/MensRights09/01/19 11:49 AM
1

men being victimized through illegal prostitution is not an outlier
/r/MensRights09/01/19 11:47 AM
1

it's not me, it's all of society which is to blame
/r/MensRights09/01/19 11:33 AM
1

no
/r/MensRights09/01/19 11:23 AM
1

Yeah dude, just like that... you know, except for the part that a man being murdered is the driving fact of this story.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 11:21 AM
1

You're trying to diffuse blame on nameless, faceless people in order to distract from the actual agent in this case: the girl who bought a gun to execute someone and rob them. I'm just refocusing these comments.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 11:17 AM
1

She bought a gun to murder this dude and take all his property. You're telling me she was forced into doing this while in the possession of a gun and instead of shooting the person forcing her, she shot some random dude who picked her up on the side of the road? Why it is the bleeding hearts come out of the woodwork to justify this sort of crap for women, but are nowhere to be seen to defend any man in similar situations?
/r/MensRights09/01/19 11:08 AM
1

Just because someone can do something, but didn't doesn't mean they share any part of the blame.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 11:03 AM
1

Be honest. Do you seriously think that this girl would have committed murder at 16 if she had been born without FAS, into a stable 2 parent household, without a meth addiction, and gone to high school instead of being pimped out by a rapist scumbag? Probably not. In this interesting list of implied but for causes, you didn't list the biggest one: Be honest, would this guy have been executed in his sleep if it wasn't for this woman holding a gun to the back of his head and pulling the trigger?
/r/MensRights09/01/19 11:02 AM
1

instead of legalizing it and regulating it to keep the girls safe. After all, who cares about the men it endangers... you know, like the dude who was executed while he slept in this exact story.
/r/MensRights09/01/19 10:58 AM
7

This shit is so pathetic to me, the entire internet bullies incels. Incels are the lowest type of person on the social totem pole, picking on them is just bullying someone who is already down. It's pathetic to try and prove your own social value by shitting on others. Literally no one is going to read this post and think, "Oh, shit, MGTOW aren't incels, look they're shitting on incels too!" They're just turning us into weapons to attack and shame men... by insulting them they cannot get women. I…
/r/MGTOW09/01/19 06:20 AM
1

This "advice" is essentially, "don't be creepy." If the person knew what it was that made them creepy or come off as creepy, they wouldn't do it. Did you bother reading the OP? I've never been called creepy. One, I'm tall and attractive. Two, I dress well and my profession is well-respected. Three, I'm tall and attractive. Want to know how I fuck women? I talk about weird subjects. I comment on their bodies. I get caught looking at them. I approach them. Crazy, I've never been called creepy. "Cr…
/r/MensRights04/01/19 11:43 AM
1

Here, I'm in a good mood so I'll point out a key difference between your comments. “Women will complain until the environment is adapted to suit them” “All men are rapists” I bolded the relevant part. Generalizations when talking on a society sized level is perfectly reasonable and well supported. Did the guy say all women? No, he didn't. He likely thinks in general the average woman does whatever he wrote. Your "analogy" has all; a better one would be "men are rapists." Now, that would still be…
/r/MensRights31/12/18 06:29 AM
1

nah, you're just an idiot
/r/MensRights31/12/18 06:22 AM
1

Retarded anti-male feminist? Sarcastic MRA being ironic? Who knows?!
/r/MensRights31/12/18 06:18 AM
8

feminism is just weaponized femininity
/r/MensRights30/12/18 10:18 PM
2

Oh, okay, sorry I misread you. I just realized you were another user than the person I was responding to and thought you were copping out on me. I agree feminists have used Trump as a way to scream the sky is falling, irrelevant of what is actually being done, and they're having a lot of success doing that. I disagree with your claim about Feminists victory over the Trump election. Feminists have gotten a strong reaction to Trump being elected, but Trump being elected was a shocking defeat of fe…
/r/MensRights30/12/18 03:19 PM
1

Did you actually read that dude? They're using the same bullshit "stats" I just explained to you were bullshit. The BBC is not even remotely unbiased.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 02:05 PM
1

Yeah, it is. The FBI thinks it's 4x the rate for other crimes.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 01:38 PM
1

What does that even mean? A whole lot of women voted for Trump.
/r/MensRights30/12/18 01:37 PM
1

but I am more willing to believe the victim(s) than the perpetrator(s) who is the victim and who is the perpetrator?
/r/MensRights29/12/18 11:30 PM
1

How is Donald Trump throwing men down a deeper hole? By forcing Universities to provide more process for men accused of sexual misconduct? For removing the bullshit "guidelines" to Universities in how to deal with accusations unless they want to risk their funding? Really dude, I'm really interested in how you could claim that Trump is throwing men down a deeper hole.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 11:22 PM
0

That's weird because it's hard to come to any conclusion other than that Democrats are anti-male. So by saying you're a Democrat, you're essentially saying men's rights aren't a priority for you and you prioritize a lot of other things above them. Of course the Republican Party is also garbage on Men's Rights... they aren't, however, constantly and explicitly anti-male.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 11:20 PM
1

except you weren't banned for being married, you were banned for spewing tradcon filth and attacking men Who raped you as a child? lol, you're a sick fuck dude... right at home in the church!
/r/MensRights29/12/18 07:30 PM
1

Here, I'll quote your post: They recently banned me from the sub for being married. Except now you admit you weren't banned for being married. You're a liar... so pretty much par for the course for tradcon garbage.
/r/MensRights29/12/18 04:52 PM
1

nerd, nasty, bossy, manlike, bitch, etc. or the worst of them all: conservative
/r/MensRights28/12/18 03:39 PM
3

mutilating children upsets people who knew?!
/r/MensRights28/12/18 01:20 AM
1

Ah, so you weren't banned for being married at all? Well, since you've already shown to misrepresent the situation, I'm sure your new post is totally accurate. Peddle your tradcon filth somewhere else.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 11:31 PM
1

MRAs, Feminists, and MGTOW all use stereotypes dude... and yet that doesn't mean all stereotypes are equal. If anything, MRAs are far more like feminists than MGTOW. But then again, it's easy to make sniping vague comments about other groups of people. It's disgusting the way so many MRAs in this thread are attacking MGTOW.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 12:35 PM
2

MGTOW is a life preserver to save individual men. Your feminist tactics won't work, society doesn't give a shit about men. They barely care when millions of them are dying in muddy trenches thousands of miles away. When people see women suffering, they care and society at large is motivated to help them. When people see men suffering, they convince themselves they somehow deserve it or turn their nose up at such pathetic things. It's why for decades the "MRAs" talking about men suffering has got…
/r/MensRights27/12/18 12:26 PM
1

I guess it's too much for "mensrights" posters to actually look at and honestly/accurately describe another part of the men's movement. Frankly, I find it hilariously ironic many of you are upset people describe you the same way as you describe MGTOW... with the same shaming language, the same attacks, and the same ignorance.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 10:20 AM
1

Yeah, you didn't get banned for being married. There are many men on there who are married and aren't banned.
/r/MensRights27/12/18 10:10 AM
6

experience working as a contributor and then editor with Wikipedia the same people who pollute wikipedia control the foundation
/r/MensRights24/12/18 02:35 PM
4

This is a total waste of time. The entire hierarchy of editors is biased and anti-male. Years ago a contingent of editors and contributors stopped because they were being drowned out with dishonest, biased actions taken on the part of the editor hierarchy when the founder essentially said he didn't care and would do nothing about it. Don't contribute and don't give them any of your money.
/r/MensRights24/12/18 02:31 PM
2

and all of it is biased and anti-male
/r/MensRights24/12/18 02:29 PM
3

the issue is that editors accept the feminist drivel and reject the anti-feminist edits
/r/MensRights24/12/18 02:28 PM
6

it will be blocked by wiki editors who have a long and demostrated bias in any topic which is even remotely controversial years ago, I was a contributor and editor and quit when many people quit after the founder essentially said he didn't care and was going to do nothing to address it do not give money to wikipedia, ever, they're a dishonest and anti-male organization
/r/MensRights24/12/18 02:26 PM
1

I'm going to genuinely respond even though it's pretty clear you're either functionally retarded or simply dishonest and a partisan troll (and likely some of all three). The first link shows her story about the justification for her "remembering" she was assaulted in a 2012 therapy session is bogus. She didn't talk to a therapist finally remembering this happened to her in 2012 when she was trying to justify the need for the 2nd door to not feel anxiety in enclosed spaces. That's not why she nee…
/r/MensRights22/12/18 03:17 AM
3

it's implying the $1m+ she received from the gofundme was a reason to lie about it
/r/MensRights21/12/18 07:34 AM
1

but there is no reason to disbelieve her either. You mean other than her not remembering any remotely disprovable fact? What about her lying about various parts of her story? What about her changing her story a number of times?
/r/MensRights21/12/18 07:32 AM
12

you don't really have any idea what you're talking about, huh?
/r/MensRights21/12/18 07:25 AM
0

you're a partisan hack, you may as well be anti-male yourself you attack people who speak on men's rights because they're not from your team and you're silent and bitch and moan when people attack your team because they're anti-male
/r/MensRights05/12/18 08:03 AM
1

the dead ambassador didn't really happen, it was just a trumptard conspiracy from 2012... years before Trump was involved in politics at all derp
/r/MensRights05/12/18 07:59 AM
1

Every single one of them was made up for hilary imagine being so partisan you actually think this
/r/MensRights04/12/18 10:43 AM
3

is it really that "inexplicable"? you have Democrats and lefties weaponizing false accusations to try to stop a SCOTUS nomination and you have Democrats and lefties attempting to defend the garbage anti-male Title IX policies as well as a bunch of other examples is it really that "inexplicable" that men would be moving away from those groups?
/r/MensRights04/12/18 10:42 AM
4

Well, that's the point really. We should be "bipartisan" in the support of men's rights. Instead, what we have is partisans who put men's rights on the back burner for a bunch of other priorities and then lamenting when people attack "their team" for pushing anti-male garbage. There is no way around it: the Democrat Party's position on the kangaroo courts is anti-male. They do untold harm to innocent men around the country right now and they have since the Obama admin directed ideologues in the …
/r/MensRights04/12/18 10:36 AM
1

What does being conservative have to do with the Democrat Party having a bunch of anti-male positions?
/r/MensRights04/12/18 10:08 AM
5

Here's is the article. Did you actually read it? I seriously doubt it. Trying to pretend the discussion is only have HRT, SRS, or puberty blockers is dishonest garbage. The author discusses their own experience with a caretaker attempting to manipulate them into being transexual, how the diagnosis and treatment can cause irreparable harm, and how the child in no way shows the signs of gender dismorphia. /u/salmonpants is a /r/menslib cuck who is here to be dishonest and lie to men attempting to …
/r/MGTOW27/11/18 08:52 AM
1

American Academy of Pediatrics should be absolutely embarrassed by their ridiculous policy stance, it's obvious it was biased from the start with authors admitting their purpose was to preserve parental choice the tl;dr: is essentially, "We don't really know about the risks, but we know the benefits outweigh them"
/r/MensRights09/11/18 09:31 AM
1

Except the Democrat Party is actually anti-male. but when push comes to shove if you’re against them on anything else they throw you under the bus. I've never voted for a Republican in my entire life. I’m not even analyzing Democrats behavior I’m analyzing Republicans. and giving the Democrats a pass for the same behavior
/r/MensRights08/11/18 12:26 AM
1

The Democrat Party is anti-male. How is it Republicans are pandering to white men? Because they're not explicitly anti-white and anti-male? No, it was the the lowest form of mudslinging to win an election. Is this a joke or are you totally incapable of objectively analyzing behaviors when a Democrat does them?
/r/MensRights07/11/18 12:38 PM
1

sexual discrimination is sexism
/r/MensRights05/11/18 04:46 AM
3

Presumptions can be rebutted, that's why they're called "presumptions" and not "conclusions." I think OJ Simpson should have been found not guilty at his trial. You realize that OJ lost a wrongful death civil trial where evidence against him was presented and cross-examined? Let's list the differences between the OJ accusation and the Kavanaugh accusation. 1) OJ was actually tried in a criminal trial where attorneys could cross-examine evidence; 2) OJ was actually tried in civil court and lost b…
/r/MensRights04/11/18 05:16 AM
1

sexism is fine as long as it harms men and benefits women
/r/MensRights04/11/18 12:44 AM
26

compulsory public schooling is anti-male, these are all simply symptoms of that
/r/MensRights04/11/18 12:42 AM
2

it really is nuts how these Republican candidates seem to only sexually assault future pussy-hat wearing Democrat activists avert your eyes "men's rights" activists, surely this isn't women weaponizing sexual assault accusations against people they now politically disagree with, no, couldn't be, it's just that those Republicans can't help themselves but to only target future Democrat activists in their younger days
/r/MensRights04/11/18 12:39 AM
2

this pattern of women coming forward to make false claims against Republican candidates is alarming Oh yeah, it really is amazing that Republicans, Kavanaugh especially, are able to only sexually assault pussy-hat wearing Democrat activists. Their target choice is uncanny. There is no other relevant explanation to how Democrat activist women are "remembering" sexual assaults which happened decades ago when those people run for political office for a party they disagree with.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 12:36 AM
9

Ya'll can downvote as much as you want. Ford's a liar. Remember when Ford's story was buttressed by her coming out during couple's therapy in 2012 where she claimed she put in a 2nd front door due to claustrophobia stemming from her sexual assault by Kavanaugh 30+ years earlier? She didn't mention Kavanaugh of course and she refused to produce the notes which allegedly existed about the session. Yeah, well, it turns out the door was put in before 2012 and she actually needed the 2nd door to run …
/r/MensRights04/11/18 12:27 AM
6

and then they publish stuff like this 1 in 4 Americans Think Kavanaugh Was Entirely Truthful No kidding, after a month of running dishonest headlines accuser Kavanaugh of lying, most people think he lied about something during some part of his testimony. Shocking.
/r/MensRights04/11/18 12:14 AM
5

"presumption of innocence" refers to more than a legal concept in a courtroom, it refers to an issue of fundamental fairness culturally we didn't get the idea from the legal system, we put it in the legal system because the ideal existed socially and we understand it is necessary to fairness in justice it is directly related to men's rights, that we should withhold judgment until it's proven otherwise because the burden is rightly place on the accuser; the accuser has the evidence, the accuser k…
/r/MensRights04/11/18 12:07 AM
3

You mean like this? being skeptical about every accusation is human rights you know, the exact first thing I stated in my first response to your comment? lol, you're disingenuous and dishonest good luck, it's sad your partisan anti-male garbage is upvoted here
/r/MensRights03/11/18 10:36 PM
14

even if there isn't any proof to convict "convict"? lol, this wouldn't even satisfy a preponderance standard Ford would have been eviscerated had any person had the opportunity to cross-examine her instead of treating her with kid gloves. "Proof"? The woman's only evidence was her naked vague accusation with literally no corroboration whatsoever. She stated various provable lies as well, e.g., she needed a 2nd front door because she felt unsafe in enclosed areas. No, she needed a 2nd front door …
/r/MensRights03/11/18 09:52 PM
1

who is instantly upvoting your comments within seconds of you posting? is there someone just following you around waiting with bated breath for any of your comments? lol Is there any other option than "true" or "false." What if someone says something and you withhold judgment? Is there comment "true" or "false" while you withhold judgment? The answer is that "not true" doesn't mean it therefore must be false. Anyway, that's all the educating I'm willing to do. Thank you for serving as yet anothe…
/r/MensRights03/11/18 09:39 PM
1

"not true" is not "false"
/r/MensRights03/11/18 09:33 PM
1

Yeah kiddo, not believing something until you're convinced of it is, in fact, skepticism. Who is instantly upvoting this anti-male dude?
/r/MensRights03/11/18 09:31 PM
1

I've never voted for a Republican in my entire life, but believe whatever you like to dismiss the substance of my comment: If you're for men's rights, you must be for the presumption of the innocence of men. you're anti-male garbage pushing Democrat partisan bullshit
/r/MensRights03/11/18 09:30 PM
3

she acted like she was telling the truth. Ford was treated more gently than actual children are treated. Ford's substantive accusation was actual nonsense. Do you even know what it was? "Some time in the summer of 85 84? 82 I was at a party with 3 4 5 7? people blah blah blah." Had she actually been cross-examined, she would have been eviscerated. It was inconsistent garbage which was untested because we treat women like children in these scenarios. You can claim you have "no love for Democrats,…
/r/MensRights03/11/18 09:28 PM
1

I forgot Clarence Thomas exists and think replacing Antonin Scalia is the same as replacing Anthony Kennedy
/r/MensRights03/11/18 09:21 PM
1

being skeptical about every accusation is human rights, it's just that men are the ones who typically suffer most of the consequences of false accusations of this type "assuming" accusations are not true and being convinced they are true is, in fact, the foundation of western systems of "justice" how in the hell is this anti-male crap being upvoted here? Get your R/D partisan bullshit out of mensrights
/r/MensRights03/11/18 09:20 PM
3

"red pill" /r/mensrights by talking about false accusations against men?
/r/MensRights03/11/18 09:16 PM
1

partisan crap yawn, your pushing partisan crap You're partisan crap! lol
/r/MensRights26/10/18 12:54 PM
1

let us know how that works out for you
/r/MensRights26/10/18 01:57 AM
1

and that's why ya'll are losing
/r/MensRights26/10/18 01:56 AM
1

frankly kiddo, I couldn't be more bored with your retarded attempt to inject partisanship into this
/r/MensRights26/10/18 01:36 AM
1

yawn
/r/MensRights26/10/18 01:17 AM
1

Nah, he was fine. I think the only thing which went too far was when he started responded to questions with essentially, " How about you!?" People who say this make me think they've never actually interacted with let alone appeared before federal judges.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 02:49 AM
1

Nah, he responded reasonably for a person who was being accused of disgusting vile conduct by national politicians and being on blast for weeks by the nation's media. He spoke the truth about the partisan hackery.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 02:28 AM
1

Let me yawn a little harder. I know some of the professors on that least, at least 3 of them from my law school signed the petition. Calling them "partisan" would be an understatement. You want to know why you should know it's partisan? Because SCOTUS justices have said partisan things in the past (as recently as 2016) and you didn't see any of these people so concerned with partisan behavior.
/r/MensRights13/10/18 02:20 AM
14

Innocent until proven guilty is a legal matter. No, it is not a legal matter... or at least not only a legal matter. Court systems were developed in order to fairly decide disputes based on underlying principles of our societies. "Innocent until proven guilty" is a fundamental part of fairness and it should be used in all situations, not just if you're sued or are prosecuted. It's exceedingly easy to accuse people of things. It's hard to defend oneself because it's difficult to prove a negative.…
/r/MensRights02/10/18 05:52 PM
52

there is no virtue in sacrificing potentially innocent people over garbage accusations
/r/MensRights02/10/18 05:31 PM
–

lol I guess men being falsely accused and having their reputations destroyed is just fine. You know, as long as it's in the context of a "job interview." The reason why we should expect any accusations, whether in a courtroom or socially be proven with corroborating evidence is because the accuser has the evidence, is the one making the accusation, and it is exceedingly difficult for a defendant to prove a negative. This is about fairness. It's patently unfair for naked, uncorroborated allegatio…
/r/MensRights02/10/18 05:25 PM
3

There was no trying, he actually did ruin their lives.
/r/MensRights25/09/18 04:32 PM
0

No, it's not the same. The "same" as believing them would be to think they're not telling truth. Doubt is withholding judgment, being unconvinced. Having doubt is neutral.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 10:47 PM
13

I may have a heart attack if I ever see these people honestly and genuinely discuss false allegations. It's dishonest, disengenuous garbage on multiple levels. The bait and switch, the mischaracterizations, the logical errors, and more.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 12:55 AM
1

I'm sorry that happened to you. However, in this situations we need some way to differentiate between legitimate accusations and false ones and the best way we've found to do that is to allow the accused to confront the accuser. It's to test their accusation against known and discoverable facts. Everyone should doubt accusations until proven otherwise or else we will be part of the machinations which destroy innocent people's lives.
/r/MensRights23/09/18 12:44 AM
10

"Regardless of gender" is what people use to overlook the fact that it's men who are the ones paying the vast majority of taxes... in addition to being the ones paying for the vast majority of everything. No one forces women to have children, to stay at home to stay with their children, or work less to care for their children. These are things women want to do in general and everyone, mostly men, are forced to subsidize that choice. The state is structured in a way to force everyone to subsidize…
/r/MensRights09/09/18 11:03 PM
1

well, it's nice that the state forces all men to support women's decisions
/r/MensRights09/09/18 06:56 PM
1

I understand you don't want to come to terms with what was done to you. So if someone gets a nose job they "mutilated" their face? Do we do nose jobs on newborns?
/r/MensRights29/08/18 06:10 PM
1

thank you for serving as an excellent example of why we as a society don't really care about male suffering I would hardly consider male circumcision in particular a source of "suffering". watch a video of male genital mutilation and come back and tell me about how it's not suffering interact with a baby who has been mutilated and come back and tell me about how that baby didn't suffer you're too young too even form a memory of the event, and then you would never know the difference unless someo…
/r/MensRights29/08/18 06:07 PM
1

you deserve to be shamed the reason you allowed it to happen is because people, you included, do not care much about male suffering the reason you accepted to perpetrate horrendous suffering on your newborn son was "he should look like his father" you're a living example of how little people care about male suffering, even their own children I’m too busy to continue this lol, you've been spamming your cliche opinion across dozens of comments
/r/MensRights29/08/18 05:05 PM
1

post asking people to stop arguing about Trump upvoted comment trying to start an argument about Trump lol
/r/MensRights29/08/18 04:48 PM
1

good argument kiddo, good luck
/r/MensRights29/08/18 04:42 PM
1

No, it's not. The reason it is tolerated is because society doesn't care about male suffering, certainly not in comparison to female suffering.
/r/MensRights29/08/18 04:40 PM
1

because society does't care about males and treat males as disposable
/r/MensRights29/08/18 04:35 PM
1

I'm not the original person you responded to you moron
/r/MensRights20/08/18 11:36 AM
1

if you're not "blaming men," then why are you bringing up dishonest and misleading facts to make it about men to avoid discussing the negative consequences of more women in the medical field? you're dishonest kiddo, good luck
/r/MensRights20/08/18 09:39 AM
1

I don’t see how that is misleading. because you're claiming the increasing number of feminization isn't the problem by using a stat about doctors aged 55-60 being mostly men... because men make up the overwhelming vast majority of doctors at that age it's just a weasel way to distract from the issue and blame men It is a negative consequence of women becoming the majority of doctors Yep. Stop blaming men and making this about men. It's okay to criticize women, it's okay to discuss the negative e…
/r/MensRights20/08/18 07:11 AM
1

At lot of women go into medicine because it has really good part time prospects (important if you want to have kids) the problem being that women are working part-time instead of full-time meaning there are fewer doctor hours to actually treat people lot of doctors in the 55-60 bracket are dropping out, and they are mostly men. because men make up the vast majority of doctors who are in that age group and worked to 55-60 you're at the very least being misleading regardless of gender except that'…
/r/MensRights19/08/18 09:46 PM
1

Gender rights aren't partisan at all. Progressives, conservatives, Republicans, Democrats, and most others are explicitly anti-male and pro male disposability.
/r/MensRights18/08/18 12:48 PM
1

People can extrapolate the logic of that in regards to criminality on their own. People can speculate about all sorts of things, but the court of appeals did not reach that decision.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 06:28 AM
1

No, they did not rule that way. They ruled the plaintiff had no constitutionally protected property claim in the enforcement of a restraining order. Read the case. The court went on to answer even if Colorado law made the enforcement mandatory, the plaintiff would still have no constitutionally protected property claim. In my jurisdiction a violation of certain restraining orders is explicitly not probable cause for an arrest. If you're claiming your jurisdiction is Colorado, you would be wrong.
/r/MensRights01/08/18 06:18 AM
1

you should vote for people instead of parties
/r/MensRights31/07/18 03:09 PM
1

no they don't
/r/MensRights31/07/18 03:07 PM
1

He's running in the Republican primary and poling pretty well. Poling with him in the general election against Claire McCaskill has him ahead. The primary to decide the Republican candidate will be August 7th.
/r/MensRights31/07/18 03:36 AM
1

read the underlying facts of the case bud
/r/MensRights30/07/18 05:03 PM
1

except the case law you're referring to did not merely hold police are not each individuals own personal security the court held that a cop who was mandated by law to perform an action and negligently failed to do so in the most ridiculous ways could not be held liable when their failure led to someone being murdered
/r/MensRights30/07/18 04:37 PM
1

You're obviously not male. Jokes targeting men, male's sexuality, etc., are extremely common among men and in male spaces. Women demanding there be no "sexist jokes" is them demanding there be special accommodation for them, specifically, and to not be treated like other men.
/r/MensRights12/06/18 12:40 PM
1

uh, no, that's not what I wrote women get special treatment because they're women; when they don't get that special treatment, they feel like like they're being discriminated against
/r/MensRights12/06/18 11:53 AM
1

of course because the women want the workplace to change to accommodate them because they're used to special treatment and not getting it means they're discriminated against
/r/MensRights12/06/18 08:21 AM
13

what utter and total nonsense men who have nothing to lose are, by far, the biggest threat to the state the people who are, by far, the least threat are those that buy into the paradigm of sacrificing themselves for others interests
/r/MGTOW30/05/18 09:37 AM
5

I doubt she's thought about it that much. If asked, my guess is she will simply say she assumed it's what he wanted. The reason why the manosphere refers to "the red pill" is because the vast majority of people are hooked into the matrix. They don't see the walls, they don't think there is another way. She wants grandkids and she wants to be able to talk to her friends about her children getting married and starting families because that is how she gets social proof. I am in no way claiming the …
/r/MGTOW21/05/18 08:29 PM
5

conscription didn't come from the left "the right" would enslave you and sacrifice you, they just dress it up differently by praising you as you jump off the cliff
/r/MGTOW20/05/18 09:03 PM
6

The person who "sacrificed" their time working so they could stay at home was compensated by being fully supported and maintained by their spouse. Additionally, the person is compensated by way of receiving an equitable distribution of assets. Again, why do you seemingly not care whatsoever that the person who continued to work also sacrificed quite a bit to support the entire family? Why is it you only seem to care about what one spouse sacrificed and ignore the other one? This discussion is ab…
/r/MGTOW18/05/18 11:45 PM
5

child support should either be a set, low basic nominal amount or not exist at all the non-custodial parent can give more if they think it's necessary for what they want, but these ridiculous % of income child support awards are really just additional spousal support agreements and create horribly imbalanced power relationships where fathers are barred from seeing their children and are wholly at the mercy of the other spouse
/r/MGTOW18/05/18 09:02 PM
0

people fucked by the state and the default list of "agreements" in state licensed marriages (some of which can be opted out of sometimes and some of which cannot) and turned into slaves deserve our sympathy
/r/MGTOW18/05/18 08:52 PM
4

good point, I should have included inflation
/r/MGTOW18/05/18 08:36 PM
1

then do it
/r/MensRights17/04/18 02:02 PM
1

well, I'm sure she wouldn't mind a paternity test then
/r/MensRights17/04/18 01:38 PM
1

Next time, before you comment, you should read the actual post. Good luck kiddo.
/r/MensRights26/03/18 05:07 PM
1

Do you honestly believe they just let people die of terminal illnesses in their cell? You can't be that naive. No, I honestly believe it's common for people to die in jail cells because they have an immediate medical need and the guards there don't really give a shit. you sound like a Christian citing the bible as evidence for the very claims it espouses. The truth of the actual story is irrelevant to my statement. You made a statement asking if the OP thought he would be given no medical care i…
/r/MensRights26/03/18 03:08 PM
1

can't imagine why anyone would want to avoid that situation
/r/MensRights26/03/18 07:07 AM
1

How much time have you spent in jail?
/r/MensRights26/03/18 06:55 AM
1

No worries, I edited my above response to better reply to your comment. It was different when I first replied. I don't think the above user is attacking you to make himself feel better and I don't think he's going out of his way to attack your religious beliefs. I think he believes Billy Graham's ideas are wrong and harmful to men and this is a post about Billy Graham. I'm not replying to you to make myself feel better, I'm commenting because I think you're mistaken and I care enough about you t…
/r/MGTOW22/02/18 05:48 PM
6

what you quoted is the exact opposite of your original post Women greatly prefer cut men as uncut men cause them pain during sex So for women who aren't lubricating well, they have much less discomfort having sex with a guy who is uncircumcised.
/r/TheRedPill21/02/18 03:44 AM
4

I think it's about a big a deal as you would probably disagree with someone tattooing their kid. It's wrong to unnecessarily permanently alter the physiology of someone else without their consent. There are significant differences between circumcised and uncircumcised dicks. If you're interested, you can put in any remotely neutral google search to see the differences from sensitivity, to proneness to erectile dysfunction, and many other things. Some prefer one to the other, but you have taken t…
/r/TheRedPill21/02/18 03:37 AM
1

I don’t see an issue with it. well you mutilated your son without his consent
/r/TheRedPill20/02/18 06:50 PM
23

They want you to do it so they don't feel bad about what they did to their sons. It's very common for people who do really stupid or shitty things to try to convince others to do it as well. Good on you for bucking their nonsense and not doing that to your son.
/r/TheRedPill20/02/18 06:47 PM
You can kill a man, but you can't kill an idea.

© TheRedArchive 2026. All rights reserved.
created by /u/dream-hunter